HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report PC 8.14.02Exhibits for Monument Ridge Preliminary Plan Review (PC) on August 14,2002
A Mail Receiots
B Proof of Publication
C Garfi eld County Zonins. Rezulations
D Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000
E Garfield Countv Subdivision Rezulations
F Staff Memorandum
G Application Materials
H No Exhibit
I No Exhibit
J Memo to Garfield County Planning Department from Garfield County Vegetation
Manager dated JuJy 24,2002
K Letter to Garfield County Planning Department from the Division of Wildlife
dated July 29,2002
L Letter to the Garfield County Planning Department from the Colorado Geologic
Survey dated Julv 24.2002
M Letter to Garfield County Planning Department from the Division of Water
Resources date July 12,2002
N Letter to Garfield County Planning Department from the Garfield County Road
and Bridee Department dated July 17, 2002.
o Letter to Mr. Peter Heineman from the Battlement Mesa Metropolitan District
dated March 8,2001
P Letter to Garfield County Planning Department from the Garfield County Sheriff
dated June25,20O2
a Letter to Garfield County Planning Department from the Garfield County School
District No. 16 dated JuJv 16.2002
R Referral Form from Garfield County Public Nurse to Garfield County Planning
Deparknent dated JuJy 2,2002
S
Letter to Garfield County Planning Department from Resources Engineering
dated Auzust 5.2002
T Latter from Zancanella & Associates to High Country Engineering dated June 12,
2002.
REQUEST:
DATE:
APPLICAI\T:
REPRESENTATIVE:
LOCATION:
SITE i ZONING:
PC 08114102
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFT' COMMENTS
Preliminary Plan review for the Monument Ridge Subdivision
August 14,2002 (Public Hearing)
Footfills Land and Development Incorporated
Roger Neal, High Country Engineering
County Roads 300 and 303 along the southeast limit of Battlernent
Mesa, southeast of Town of Parachute, Colorado
181.9 acres / A/R/RD
I. PROJECT SUMMARY
The Applicant requests preliminary plan review for the Monument Ridge Subdivision. The subject
site contains 181.9 acres to be subdivided into 17 lots ranging from 5.9 to 13.7 acres each. The
properfy is located at the intersection of County Roads 300 and 303 along the southeast limit of
Battlernent Mesa, approximately 2 miles southeast of the Town of Parachute, Colorado. Adjacent
land uses to the property include undeveloped land, partially developed agriculturat / residential land,
public land, and a residential subdivision ftnown as the Tamarisk Subdivision.) Water for the
subdivision would be provided by individual and shared wells and sewage treatrnent would be
-ra=---
provided by Individual Septic Disposal Systems QSDS) for each lot. Access to the majority of lots is
provided directly from CR 300 and CR 300. Lots 10 and L4-17 are accessed from a private cul-de-
sac. The Applicant proposes the lots to be residential lots containing single-family dwellings which
provides for a low density of 10.7 acres per dwelling unit.
IL SITE DESCRIPTION
The 181 .9 acre tract is comprised of gently sloping terrain or undulating topography located in the
Monument Gulch drainage. The site is characterized as montane grassland that includes fescues,
oatgrass, Junegrass, and Mountain muhly. The soils are mostly comprised ofPotts loam, which has
moderate permeability, and available water capacity is high. The only major drainage basin within
the property with an established 100-year floodplain is the Monument Gulch and its tributaries. The
basin flows through the site, from east to northwest and eventually drains into the Colorado River.
More specifically, three smaller drainage channels occur on the northern and central portions of the
property. CR 300 runs in a north-south direction through the center of the property. At present, the
property has been used for cattle and horse grazing and an irrigation ditch to the west of CR 300
provides water to fields on Lots I,3, 5,7,9, arrd 10.
III. PROPERTY LAND USE HISTORY
A portion of the property recently received approval from the BOCC on January 14,2002 for a
Subdivision Exemption. This Exemption effectively created 5 Parcels from a parent Parcel of 280
acres resulting in Parcel t having 6.4 ac, Parcel 2having6 ac, Parcel 3 having 6 ac, Parcel4 having
80 ac, and Parcel 5 having 96 ac.Five parcels were able to be created from the parent parcel because
two county roads (CR 303 and CR 300) bisect the property. Parcels 1-3 were the subject of the
Exemption. Parcels 4 and 5 comprising a total of 176 acres are proposed to be split into l7 lots.
IV. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSTVE PLAN
The subject site is located in Sndy Area 3 of the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. It is also located
within the two-mile sphere of influence of the Town of Parachute. The suggested proposed land use
district by the Comprehensive Plan is designated as "outlying residential." The underlying zoning is
A./R/RD, which allows for a minimum lot size of 2 acres per dwelling unit. The subdivision proposes
an average lot size of 10 acres, which is well above the 2-acre minimum.
V. REFERRAL AGENCIES
Staff refened the Application out to the following referral agencies for comments on the proposed
subdivision.
School District 16: The District provided comments regarding 1) an additional bus route to
serve the development, 2) the impact on already fulI schools, 3) condition of CR 300, and 4)
domestic animal nuisance and safety. (See Exhibit Q)
Colorado Division of Water Resources: The Division stated the water supply should be
physically adequate to supply the proposed uses. The proposed water supply will not cause
material injury to decreed water rights. (See Exhibit ltl)
Colorado Geological Survey: CGS provided a variety of comments regarding the sites
apparent geologic hazards. These are discussed in depth in the body of the memorandum. (See
Exhibit L)
Garfield County Road & Bridge: The Department recommends the developer lower aportion
A.
B.
C.
D.
of CR 300 to include the culvert extensionto extend from inside fence line to inside fence line.
The lowering of CR 300 provides for the visibility needed for Monument Ridge Road. The
culvert extension eliminates the County's liability for the maintenance of the ditch and culvert.
In addition, the Departrnent recommends that the developer deed a 60-foot right-of-way on both
CR 300 and CR 303. It would be the responsibility of the developer to set the fences back to the
right-of-way. A stop sign should be installed at the end of Monument Ridge Road at the
entrance to CR 300 which complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Conhol devices. (See
Exhibit N)
E. Colorado Division of Wildlife: DOW indicated the importance ofthe habitat in the Monument
Gulch area that provides good cover for small mammals, and song birds, but especially for mule
deer. DOW recommended the development incorporate the area of Monument Gulch as open
space to be conserrred and not developed. This potential open space would further compliment
the open space in the Monument Gulch created with the Battlement Mesa PUD . (See Exhibit K)F. Garlield County Vegetation Management: Steve Anthony provided comments which are
included in the weed management section of the memorandrxn below. (See Exhibit.I)G. Garfield County Sheriff, Jim Sears: The County Sheriff indicated l) all access roads have
sufficient width to accommodate fire and EMS equipment; 2) aurty roads that dead-end into a
cul-de-sac should have an ending radius large enough to accommodate fire or EMS equipment
turn around radius; 3) all roads and roadways shall be clearly marked with correct County road
numbers and names; and 4) all street addresses be clearly marked and visible from the County
Roads or access roads. (See Exhibit P)H. Battlement Mesa Metropolitan District: The District indicated to the Applicant the District
has a long-standing policy that no inclusions for water or waste water will be authorized
regarding the request from the developer to tie into the Battlernent Mesa Metropolitan District
water and sewer plant. (See Exhibit O)I. Garlield county Public Nurse: No concerns regarding the proposal.J. Garfield county Emergency Management: No comment at this time.K. Bookcliff Soil conservation District: No comment at this time.L. Town of Parachute: No comment at this time.
M. Grand valley Fire Protection District: No comment at this time.N. US West Communications: No comment at this time.O. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment:No comment at this time.P. Holy Cross Electric: No comment at this time.
YI. STAFF COMMENTS
A. Comprehensive Plan
The subject site is located instudy Area 3 of the Comprehensive Plan of 2000 where the suggested
proposed land use district is "outlying residential" which allows for 2 acre subdivisions and is
consistent with the underlying zoning is A/R/RD, which also allows for a minimum lot size of 2
acres. The subdivision proposes an average lot size of 10 acres, which is well above the 2 acre
minimum and therefore consistent with the density measure of the plan.
Due to the project's location within an area of urban influence, the Applicant is encouraged to
explore opportunities to obtain water and sewer services from the Town ofParachute and Battlement
Mesa Metropolitan District. The Comp Plan recognizes that land use decisions, particularly those
immediately adjacent to municipal boundaries, have created compatibility problems. Since this site
lies within the threshold for urban services, the Applicant was encouraged during the sketch plan
phase to explore the possibility of obtaining water and sewer serices from either the Town of
Parachute, or the Battlernent Mesa Metropolitan District.
The Applicant contacted the Battlement Mesa Metro District regarding the possibility of connecting
to their central water and wastewater system. However, the District indicated they have a long-
standing policy that no inclusions will be authorized regarding the request from the developer to tie
into the Battlernent Mesa Metropolitan District water and sewer plant. In addition, the Applicant
indicated that it would not be practical to tie into the Parachute system since it discharges into the
Battlement Mesa Metro District and is undesirable due to the geographical location. (SeeErft ibit O)
B. Zoning
A single family dwelling is a use by right in the A/R/RD zone district. Accessory uses are allowed if
they are part of a public hearing or meeting on a subdivision. The Applicant should be aware ofthe
zone district standards in the Garfield County ZorungResolution regarding uses and dimensional
requirernents.
C. Water Supply
The Applicant proposes individual and shared wells to serve the 17 lots. Zancanella& Associates
provided a report outlining details of the proposed wells and water seryice agreements with West
Divide Water Conservancy District. Specifically, Lot I I will be served by Well #8. The 16
remaining lots are proposed to share 6 wells, Well #5 and Wells #21 - #25 which are to be covered
under well sharing agreemants. The Applicant states that each lot will have an individual well permit
for elective use by the future homeowner which will allow the future homeowner the flexibility to
explore the iarge lot at their discretion, while still providing a tested water supply for each lot from
the shared wells. (See Exhibit T)
At this time, the Applicant has drilled five wells that have been permitted for the subdivision that
have been tested for quantity and quality. This information is provided in Exhibit 7. The Applicant
contacted the Battlement Mesa Metropolitan District for potential inclusion in their systan.
However, the District indicated that was not possible. Additionally, the Appticant indicates that due
to the minimal density, it is not feasible to construct a cenfral water systern.
The Colorado Division of Water Resources reviewed the proposal and stated the water supply should
be physically adequate to supply the proposed uses. The long-term adequacy of any groundwater
source may be subject to fluctuation due to hydrologic and climatic trends. The proposed water
supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights, so long as the Applicant maintains
valid well permits per the District's Substitute Supply Plan, and is physically adequate. The use of
the irrigation water rights must not result in an expansion or change of use, and approval of a change
of water right application by the water court may be necessary of the place or type of use is changed.
(See Exhibit ltl)
Michael Erion of Resource Engineering recofirmends that individual wells be drilled for each lot. In
addition, the Applicant intends for the fire protection for the project to be left up to the individual
homeowners. Resource Engineering recommends the fire diskict, which will serve the area, be
contacted for specific requirements necessary for them to provide fire protection. If on-site storage is
required, it should be constructed as a central facility and not be left up to the individual
homeowners. This is consistent with approvals for other subdivisions within the County. (See
Exhibit S)
Regarding irrigation water, it appears a large portion of the project site has been historically
irrigated, although in recent years only a small portion of the property has been irrigated. Resource
Engineering suggests that while the covenants atternpt to define how the irrigation water will be used
within the subdivision; it is too general and vague and there is no clear understanding ofhow water
is to be divided among the lots. In order to prevent future problerns among lot owners, a more
specific division of water among the lots should be developed. Staff has made this a condition of
approval.
D. Waste Water
The Applicant proposes sewage treatrnent for all the lots to be handled by Individual Septic Disposal
Systems (ISDS). Similar to the request to connect into the Battlement Mesa Mefropolitan District for
water service, the District policy does not allow inclusion for septic hook up as well. Moreover, the
Town of Parachute's wastewater system discharges into the District's system. The sewage ge,nerated
from the each lot containing a single-family dwelling would be approximately 350 gallons / day
based on a 3.5 a day / resident occupancy rate.
The geologic evaluation conducted by CTL Thompson (a report located in the application) states
they believe ISDS will be appropriate at this site as a result of the existing soil types and percolation
testing conducted at the site. (See page 12 of the report in application.) CTL Thompson
recommended performing additional percolation testing when actual percolation field locations are
known for the ISDS when each lot is being developed. Staff has also made this a condition of
approval.
The Applicant intends for individual lot owners to be responsible for the installation of the ISDS
designed by a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado. Maintenance of each system
will be the responsibility of the individual lot owner and as outlined in the protective covenants of
the subdivision. Individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) are proposed for each lot. Typically,
ISDS must be accompanied by a detailed maintenance plan contained in the covenants. Staffhas also
made this a condition of approval.
E. Floodplain/ Wetlands
Staffreviewed Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) provided by the Federal Emergency Managanent
Agency (FEMA) and determined Monument Gulch, which bisects the middle of the property from
east to west, is a delineated 10O-year floodplain and touches lots 4-9. In addition, a smaller drainage
on the north portion is also delineated as a 100-year floodplain that runs through lot 1 of the
proposed Monument Ridge Subdivision and through lots land 2 createdby the earlier subdivision
exemption. While the Applicant notes the two drainages within the 100-year floodplain, they do not
discuss them in any substantive detail nor suggest the location of building envelopes that show
mitigation by avoidance.
Michael Erion of Resource Engineering reviewed the submittal and commented that the vegetation
report does not identiff the extent of wetlands and waters of the U.S. within the property. This may
be important as it relates to driveway crossings and building envelopes. Staff has required the
Applicant to provide Staffwith a site plan that delineates any wetlands and waters ofthe U.S. within
the property as well as the siting of building envelopes so that it rerrrains clear there will be no
infringernent in those sensitive areas. (See Exhibit S)
F. Soils/Geology
The report conducted by CTL Thompson ultimately concluded that no geologic conditions or
geologic hazards exist to preclude the development of the site for single-family residential use.
Further, the analysis indicates the subsoil conditions are generally favorable for the proposed
residential development. However, there are debris flow hazards on the property that need to be
addressed with respect to development location.
Colorado Geologic Survey (CGS) states building envelopes should be located outside of the hazard
areas shown on CTllThompson's Geologic Hazards Map in the application. While the proposed lots
are large and should accommodate flexibility in the placement of building envelopes, particular
attention should be paid to Lots 1, 5, and 17 due to the significant area of these lots that contains
potential debris flow hazards.
On lots such as these where "mitigation by avoidance" may not be feasible, CGS recommends a
drainage basin hydrologic analysis will need to be preformed to quantifr the debris flow hazard and
to design the appropriate mitigation such as careful site grading to provide channelization and
conveyance of debris i mud flows around and away from buildings. Staffhas required the Applicant
to proposed building envelopes on all lots as well as delineate where geologic hazards are mapped
using the CTllThompson analysis. It is in this way Staff will be able to better determine the hazards
in relation to the proposed building envelopes.
Regarding access to lots ll, 12, and 13, the Drainage Study states that "drainages will not be
changed by the proposed development," but it is unclear whether this statement refers to the drainage
that runs between the southem edge of the CR 300 and proposed lots 1l-13. Driveway access to
these lots should be designed so that this drainage is not blocked.
Due to the expansive and compressible soils, the owner / developer of each lot shall conduct
additional design level geotechnical studies, once building locations are finalized, to characterize soil
and engineering properties beneath each plarured structure. This information is needed to develop a
site-specific designrecommendations and construction criteria. Soil conditions atplanned foundation
depths will dictate whether footings with a minimum load will be needed to counteract expansive
clays. In addition, the developer shall make this CTL /Thompson report available as a reference for
potential lot owners for a reference.
Resource Engineering and Staff recommend that building envelopes be developed on each property
due to the significant issues related to debris flow and unstable slopes on the property. In addition,
because the site contains soils that include expansive clays and compressible soils and proposed
driveways are to cross unstable slopes, the Applicant shall include a plat note on the final plat to
indicate that due to geologic hazard and soil conditions, site-specific geotechnical angineering
studies must be completed for each lot. Lastly, Resource Engineering indicated that the Monument
Ridge Road cul-de-sac is located in the middle of a debris flow area. The submittal should indicate
that appropriate mitigation measures have been designed into the grading and drainage plan. (See
Exhibit S)
G. Road/Access
The property is located at the intersection of County Roads 300 and 303 along the southeast limit of
Battlement Mesa, approximately 2 miles southeast of the Town of Parachute, Colorado. Access to
the majority of lots is provided directly from CR 300 and CR 300. Lots 10 and 14-17 are accessed
from a private cul-de-sac that is 600 feet in length. The Comprehensive Plan defines county Road
300 as a road in "fair" condition.
The Garfield County Road and Bridge reviewed the proposal and requested 1) the Applicant provide
a 30' easernent from the center line of 300 and 303 for future road upgrading,2) the fences on the
property need to be pushed back to the property boundaries at the developer's expense, 3) the area of
the road north of the proposed cul-de-sac will have to be lowered and the culvert extended beyond
the fence lines onto the developer's property. ln addition, the number of driveway access points onto
to CR 300 and 303 should be minimized as much as possible via shared driveway accesses. As a
note of interest, the developer did agree to dedicate a 60' wide easernent to Garfield County during
the Sketch Plan review.
The road(s) servicing parcels must meet the standards in Section 9:30 of the Subdivision
Regulations. The proposed cul-de-sac serving lots I 0 and 14-17 is 600 feet long which meets county
standards for length. The standards to which the roads must be built are based on the number of lots
the road seryes, and the estimated number of vehicle trips generated. For example, a cul-de-sac
serving four (4) (lots such as this proposal) must be built to the "semi-primitive" standard which
calls for a minimum 40' right-of-way, with tvrro 8' wide lanes, and a gravel surface, with a 2-3%
cross slope and a maximum grade of l0%.It appears the proposed road and cul-de-sac meets the
county standards.
Regarding traffic generation, the Applicant has provided an estimated traffic generation analysis
based on a total of 20 primary residences that includes the former exernption parcels. This current
development proposes 17 single-family residences. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6" Edition
uses 9.57 trips per day per residence. At that rate,lT proposed residences produce a total of 163 fips
per day. The proposed subdivision is located in the Garfield County Traffic Study Area I regarding
impact fees. This area calls for an impact feepayment to Garfield County of $280 per average daily
trip (ADT) generated by the subdivision. This results in a total payment of $45,553.00 or $2,679.00
per lot. Staffhas made this paymurt to Garfield County a condition of approval to be paid at the time
of final plat.
Resource Engineering (See Exhibit,S) provided the following comments regarding the proposed
road and access issues on the property:
1. The proposed common driveway access for Lots 3 and 4 appears to be too close to the
intersection of County Road 300 and County Road 303. This should be addressed at final
plat.
2. The proposed grading and drainage at the intersection of County Road 300 and the proposed
Monument Ridge Road should be reworked. The proposed grading provides an adverse
slope for northbound vehicles on County Road 300. The culvert should be lengthened and
moved further away from the intersection of County Road 300 and Monument Ridge Road.
A ditch will need to be constructed on the downstream side of the culvert to convey flows to
the existing natural drainage.
3. There is an existing high spot in County Road 300 approximately 150 feet from the 90
degree bend and proposed intersection with Monument Ridge Road. This high spot should
be flattened out to improve site distance in this area.
4. The proposed common driveway access for Lots 12 and 13 is an existing ranch road with
also traverses Lot 1 l. It is unclear why this road cannot also be used for Lot 1 1 access.
II. Fire Protection
The Applicant proposes language in the covenants for the subdivision that each individual lot shall
be required to install a fire protection system conforming to the NFPA 1231 Standards on Water
Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting. This standard requires residents to provide a quantity
of water based on the cubic feet and type of building constructed on the individual lot. Natural
bodies of water or constructed sources of water may be used as fire protection water. The residents
shall consult the local fire chief for the recommended type of fire protection water systerns to be used
on individual lots. Alternatively, the fire chief may allow in lieu of on site water storage, an
automatic fire sprinkler system conforming to the NFPA 13D in the residence, with the water storage
likely located in the mechanical room in the residence. In addition, irrigation water will also be
available on site and will be delivered via existing irrigation ditches that are located on the property.
The property lies within the Grand Valley Fire Protection District that did not provide comments to
Staff in time to be included in this Memorandum.
The Applicant intends for the fire protection for the project to be left up to the individual
homeowners. Resource Engineering recommends the fire district, which will serve the are4 be
contacted for specific requiranents necessary for them to provide fire protection. If on-site storage is
required, it should be constructed as a central facility and not be left up to the individual
homeowners. This is consistent with approvals for other subdivisions within the County. (See
Exhibit S)
I. Drainage
As noted earlier, there are three drainages running through the property with the most prominent
drainage being Monument Gulch that runs east to west through the middle ofthe property. A smaller
drainage runs east to waste across the northern portion of the property and a third drainage runs east
to west along the southern property line. The application states the development will have minimal
impact on drainages running through the property. In addition, the Applicant states adequately sized
culverts will be installed where needed. Staff and Michael Erion conducted a site visit and examined
the drainages discussed in the application.
The Applicants provide a drainage plan that indicates that storm water run-offwiIl come from sheet
flow on the lots themselves and from the roads which will drain into roadside swales. Runofffrom
the lots will in some cases flow into the existing irrigation ditches. The plan further indicates that
detention will not be necessary due to the large open areas left as pasture lands on the lots. The
Applicant states that the drainages on the property will not be changed by the proposed developmant.
The report from CTl/Thompson indicated that surface drainage will need to control and channelize
surface water down, around, and away from building s and off of roads. Seasonal surface flows
through building footprints need to be re-routed away from buildings. Any areas of ponding water
should be eliminated. CTL / Thompson also recommend a slope of at least 12 inches be used in the
first 10 feet away from all building to decrease the potential of wetting soils near the structure
foundations.
Resource Engineering indicated through their analysis that l) the drainage plan in this submittal
indicates in one paragraph that detention will not be required and in another paragraph indicates that
detention will be required for the additional developed flows. This issue needs to be clarified and the
drainage plan needs to dernonstrate that it is in compliance with the Garfield County Subdivision
Regulations; 2) There is no analysis regarding the adequacy of the existing culverts, especially the
County Road 300 crossing of Monument Gulch; and 3) as recommended in the CTL Thompson
report, the drainage analysis must consider the debris/mud flow and include a40Yoto S}Yobulking
factor.
J. Wildtife
The comments provided by the Colorado Department of Wildlife (DO!y) indicated the most
important wildlife habitat area on the property is the part of Monument Gulch that runs through the
property providing good cover for small mammals, and songbirds, but especially for mule deer.
DOW recommended the development incorporate the area of Monument Gulch as open space to be
conserved and not developed. This potential open space would further compliment the open space in
the Monument Gulch created with the Battlement Mesa PUD. Open space would help preserve the
wildlife value of the property and would help mitigate the cumulative impacts of the proposed
development. The proposed covenants cannot assure that the wildlife habitat would be protected and
that the important values identified in the wildlife plan are preserved or mitigated for.
In addition, DOW recornmends that the fence reshictions include: that the top and bottom wire be
barbless, and the second wire from the top wire be at least 12 inches from the top wire, and the
bottom wire be at least 16 inches offthe ground. The overall height should not be over 42 inches in
height. Restricting dogs and cats to the property will benefit wildlife. (See Exhibir^K) Staffagrees
with these recommendations.
The Applicant provided a wildlife report conducted by Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc
which states the Monument Ridge Subdivision will have very minimal impacts on wildlife due to
large lots, low density, and a high amount of private open space. As a result, wildlife will remain
present on the property. In addition, 11 of the 17 lots are currently very poor habitat due to their
degraded nature from heavy grazing and lack of irrigation. The report concurs with the DOW
findings that the most valuable habitat is Monument Gulch running through the property and most
notably on the westem portion of lot 7.T\e report states "daytime resting areas and security cover
for Mule Deer will not be impacted unless there is a significant human disturbance in the east-west
ravine located on the southern border of lot 7. There are no federal or Colorado threatened,
endangered, or candidate wildlife that will be measurable impacted by the development. The
development will have a local affect on individuals of common spe3cies of birds, amphibians, small
animals, and mule deer, but will not result in a loss of viability in the area or the loss of critical
habitat.
K. Vegetation
The Applicant provided a Vegetation Managernent Plan prepared by Beach Environmental, LLC.
Staff also referred the application to Stave Anthony of the Garfield County Deparbnent of
Vegetation Management. (See Exhibit 4 Mr. Anthony is requesting:
a
o
a
o
o
A weed management plan that will address fall treatrnent of Russian knapweed on theproposed
five lots.
Estimates of amount of surface area disturbed (Monument Ridge Road).
Cost estimates for revegetation work.
Soil managonant plan.
A revegetation bond (may be based on applicant's cost estimates).
Certified weed free hay or straw for check dams.
As mentioned above, the Applicant provided Vegetation Management Plan prepared by Beach
Environmental,LLc which includes an inventory and map showing the location of the identified
weeds. The plan also provides a management plan for weed control on the property including
revegetation planting types, proposed schedules for weed contol, and a variety of weed control
methods.
While the Beach Environmental report includes a plant material list and schedule, the revised
Revegetation Guidelines from the Garfield County Weed Management Plan (adopted on May 7,
2001) also calls for a 1) Planting schedule, 2)map of the areas impactedby soil disturbances (outside
of the building envelopes), and 3) revegetation bond or security at Preliminary Plan and prior to
Final Plat. Staffhas required the Applicant to provide a map or information, prior to final plat that
quantifies the area, in terms of acres, to be disturbed and subsequently reseeded on road cut and
utility disturbances. This information will help determine the amount of security that will held for
revegetation. The revegetation bond amount will be determined by staff after the applicant
provides the aforementioned information.
L. Assessment / Fees
As mentioned above, the proposed subdivision is located in the Garfield County Traffic Study Area
1 regarding impact fees. This area calls for an impact fee payment to Garfield County of $280 per
average daily trip (ADT) generated by the subdivision. This results in a payment of $45,553.00 to
the County or as adjusted by county regulations and policies in effect at the time of final plat.
The Applicant is also responsible for paying the School Land Dedication Impact Fees orpay cash-in-
lieu of that land dedication which will be due at the time of final plat. An estimated fee based on
current fee regulations requiring $200 per each newly created parcel (Section 9:80 ofthe Subdivision
Regulations) would be equal to $3,400. In any event, the Applicant shall be required to pay the
10
appropriate assessments and / or impact fees based on the regulations in effect at the time of final
plat review. This has also been included as a condition of approval.
M. Open Space
The Applicant proposes no dedicated open space as part of the subdivision. The lots are large,
ranging from 5.9 to 13.7 acres and the density is fairly low allowing for private open space on
individual lots. Staff shongly recommends the Applicant place the area within the Monument Gulch
in a conservation easement dedicated to open space so that the onty distinguishable wildlife habitat
in the development may be preserved as well as tie into the gulch as it continues into Battlernent
Mesa.
N. Phasing of the Development
The Applicant provided a phasing plan which only shows that lots located north and east of CR 300
will be included in Phase I and the lots south and west of CR 300 are included in Phase II.
Specifically, the Applicant proposes performing all public improvements and utility installation for
lots 5 and9-17 for Phase I. The public improvements shall include the construction of Monument
Ridge Road, replacement of the existing 15 inch culvert crossing CR 300 just north of the proposed
intersection of CR 300 and Monument Ridge Road, and the installation of the potable water wells
mentioned above. The rernaining utilities and wells for lots 104 and 6-8 would be completed in
Phase II.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
1. That proper posting and public notice was provided, as required, for the hearing before the
Planning Commission;
2. That the meeting before the Planning Commission was extensive and complete, that all
pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at
that hearing;
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed subdivision is in the best interest of
the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of
Garfield County;
4. That the application is in conformance with the 1978 Garfield County ZoningResolution,
as amended;
5. That the application is in conformance with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations
of 1984.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
"I move to recommend APPROVAL to the Board ofthe preliminaryplan review for the Monument
Ridge Subdivision with conditions to the Board of county Commissioners."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staffrecommends that the Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL to the Garfield County
11
2.
J.
4.
Board of County Commissioners for the preliminary plan request for the Monument Ridge
Subdivision with the following conditions:
l. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing
before the Plaruring Commission, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by
the Planning Commission.
The Applicant shall include language in the protective covenants for the subdivision that require
the developers / purchasers of each individual lot to perform additional percolation testing when
actual percolation field locations are known to determine the most appropriate location for ISDS.
The Applicant shall require individual lot owners to be responsible for the installation of the
ISDS designed by a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado. Maintenance of
each systern will be the responsibility of the individual lot owner and as outlined in the
protective covenants of the subdivision. In addition, each ISDS must be accompanied by a
detailed maintenance plan contained in the covenants.
Due to potential debris flow hazards through the property, the Applicant shall designate "no
building areas" on all of the proposed lots. All proposed structures shall be set back at least 20
feet from the top of any drainage outlined in the CTL /Thompson Report as well as the Resource
Engineering Report. In addition, the Applicant shall specifically show where the geologic
hazards are mapped using the CTllThompson analysis in order to specifically determine the "no
build areas." On lots such as these where "mitigation by avoidance" may not be feasible, the
Applicant shall conduct a drainage basin hydrologic analysis to quantifu the debris flow hazard
and to design the mitigation to provide channelization and conveyance of debris / mud flows
around and away from buildings, but the size of channels and diversion structures should be
designed based on a hydrologic analysis. This analysis shall be provided at final plat.
The Applicant shall redesign the driveway access to lots I I - l3 so that drainage is not blocked.
The Applicant shall provide the necessary plan details for this redesign at the time of final plat.
Due to the expansive and compressible soils, the owner / developer of each lot shall conduct
additional design level geotechnical studies once building locations are finalized, to characteize
soil and engineering properties beneath each planned structure. This information is needed to
develop a site-specific design recofirmendations and construction criteria. Soil conditions at
planned foundation depths will dictate whether footings with a minimum load will be needed to
counteract expansive clays. As a result, the developer shall make this CTL /Thompson report
available as a reference for potential lot owners for a reference.
The Applicant shall pay the School Land Dedication Impact Fee or pay cash-in-lieu of that land
dedication which shall be due at the time of final plat. An estimated fee based on current fee
regulations requiring $200 per each newly created parcel (Section 9:80 of the Subdivision
Regulations) would be equal to $3,400. The Applicant shall be required to pay the appropriate
assessments and / or impact fees based on the regulations in effect at the time of final plat
review.
5.
6.
7.
t2
8. The proposed subdivision is located in the Garfield County Traffic Study Area 1. This area calls
for an impact fee payment to Garfield County of $280 per average daily trip (ADT) generated by
the subdivision. The Applicant shall make a payment to Garfield County of $45,553.00. The
Applicant shall make this payrnent to Garfield County or as adjusted by county regulations and
policies in effect at the time of final plat.
9. Pursuant to the recommendation by the Garfield County Road and Bridge Departrnent, the
Applicant shall:
a. Push back the fences on the property to the property boundaries at the developer's
expense;
b. There is an existing high spot in County Road 300 approximately 150 feet from the 90
degree bend and proposed intersection with Monument Ridge Road. This high spot will
be flattened out to improve site distance in this area and extend the culvert beyond the
fence lines onto the developer's property. The Applicant shall submit plans of this detail
with the final plat.
c. Provide a 60 foot wide easernent (30' easement from the center line) to Garfield County
for CR 300 and CR 303 for future road upgrading.
10. The Applicant shall provide Staff with a site plan that delineates any wetlands and waters of the
U.S. within the property as well as the siting of building envelopes so that it remains clear there
will be no infringement in those sensitive areas. This shall be submitted to the Planning
Departrnent at the time of final plat.
1 1. The Applicant shall provide a copy of the letter from the Battlernent Mesa Metropolitan Dishict
indicating the District will not serve the proposed project with water and / or wastewater and
should be included for the record at the time of final plat.
12. The covenants provided in the application that discusses irrigation water to serve the lots is very
general and vague and there is no clear understanding of how water is to be divided among the
lots. In order to prevent future problems among lot owners, the Applicant shall provide a more
specific division of water among the lots should be developed at the time of final plat.
13. The Applicant shall provide an improved driveway detail for Lots 3 and 4 due to its current
proposed location which appears to be too close to the intersection of CR300 and CR 303. This
shall be approved by the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department for the proposed access.
In addition, the Applicant shall provide approvals for all proposed access points to any County
Road for any of the lots at the time of final plat.
14. The proposed grading and drainage at the intersection of County Road 300 and the proposed
Monument Ridge Road should be reworked. The proposed grading provides an adverse slope for
northbound vehicles on County Road 300. The culvert should be lengthened and moved further
away from the intersection of County Road 300 and Monument Ridge Road. A ditch will need
to be constructed on the downstream side of the culvert to convey flows to the existing natural
drainage. This shall be submitted at the time of final plat.
13
15. The Applicant shall provide a vegetation bond to be held by Garfield County for the new
Monument Ridge Road at the request of the Garfield County Department of Vegetation
Management. The revegetation bond amount will be determined by staff after the Applicant
provides information requested inExhibit J. The bond amount shall be determined and required
by the Garfield County Weed Management Director at the time of Final Plat. The security shall
be held by Garfield County Vegetation Director until vegetation has been successfully
reestablished according to the attached Reclamation Standards. Once determined by the Director
that successful reclamation has occurred, the security shall be released.
16. Pursuant to the revised Revegetation Guidelines from the Garfield County Weed Management
Plan (adopted on May 7,2007),the Applicant shall provide a Soil Management Plan, related to
outside-the-building envelope activities, such as new road construction, that includes l)
provisions for salvaging on-site topsoil, 2) a timetable for eliminating topsoil and/or aggregate
piles, 3) and a plan that provides for soil cover if any disturbances or stockpiles will sit exposed
for a period of 90 days or more. The Applicant shall present this plan, approved by the Garfield
County Weed Management Deparhnent at the time of final plat.
17. The Applicant shall drill and test wells for each individual lot rather than share wells which
requires considerable piping and pumping in order to reach lots. The Applicant shall submit
approved well permits to the Garfield County Planning Deparhnent and approval from the State
Division of Water resources indicating that the proposed new wells for each individual lot will
not cause material irUury based on the appropriate state statutes. All evidence of these requests
shall be provided to the Planning Department at the time of final plat.
t4
MEMORANDT]M
To: Fred Jarman
From: Steve Anthony
Re: Comments on the Monument Ridge Preliminary Plan
Date: July 24,2002
Thanls for the opportunity to comment on the Monument Ridge Preliminary Plan. My comments are as
follows:
1. Noxious Weeds
A. Inventory and mapping-The applicant has provided a report an inventory and map of
county listed noxious weeds. Five lots are reported to have Russian knapweed
B. Weed Management-The applicant has provided basic information regarding weed
management on the surveyed noxious weeds. The applicant is encouraged to initiate a
fall (mid-September thru mid-October) treatrnent for the Russian knapweed that is
inventoried on the five lots.
Common area weed management-The applicant shall assign weed management
responsibilities for common areas (roads, roadcuts, any common open space areas).
The section in the covenants under "Road Maintenance-Private Road Standards" may be
an appropriate place to address this.
Utility line disturbances and noxious weed invasion-Utility line disturbances continue to
be a significant source of noxious weed invasion throughout Garfield County. On many
occasions after a placement of a utility, subsequent weed invasions are ignored because it
is unclear which party is responsible for the follow-up revegetation and weed
management. The applicant should address this issue prior to the next phase in the
planning process and identify the parties responsible for utility line vegetation
management.
Revegetation
The revised Revegetation Guidelines (available off the county website at www.garfield-
county.com) from the Garfield County Weed Management Plan (adopted on May 7, 2001) calls
for the following:
A. Plant material list.
B. Planting schedule.
C. A map of the areas impacted by soil disturbances (outside of the building envelopes).
D. A revegetation bond or security at Preliminary Plan and prior to Final Plat.
C.
D.
The applicant has provided a revegetation plan that includes A & B.
Please provide a map or information, prior to final plat, that quantifies the area, in terms of acres,
to be disturbed and subsequently reseeded on road cuts and utility disturbances. ffis information
will help determine the amount of security that will held for revegetation.
The applicant may include estimates for the reclamation efforts. The estimates should include
costs for seeding, mulching, and other factors that may aid in plant establishment.
Garfreld County shall hold the security until vegetation has been successfully reestablished
according to the attached Reclamation Standards. The Board of County Commissioners will
designate a member of their staff to evaluate the reclamation prior to the release of the security.
It is the recommendation of staff that the County request a revegetation bond for the new
Monument Ridge Road.
3. Soil Plan
The Revegetation Guidelines also request that the applicant provide a Soil Management Plan that
includes:
Provisions for salvaging on-site topsoil.
A timetable for eliminating topsoil and/or aggregate piles.
A plan that provides for soil cover ifany disturbances or stockpiles will sit exposed for a
period of 90 days or more.
Sedimentation Control
The bales used in the hay check dams shall be certified weed free.
In summary the Vegetation Management Department is requesting:
a
a
a
a
a
A weed management plan that will address fall treatment of Russian knapweed on the proposed
five lots.
Estimates of amount of surface area disturbed (Monument Ridge Road).
Cost estimates for revegetation work.
Soil management plan.
A revegetation bond (may be based on applicant's cost estimates).
Certified weed free hay or straw for check dams.
Please feel free to contact me at 625-3969.
Jul l*Dz ol:53p John Broderick
STATEff COLORADO
Bill CHens' Govemor
OEPNNNTiM OF NATURAL RESOURCE$-olvlsloN oF WILDLIFE
AN fOUAt OPPOEIUNITY ET'PLOYER
RussdCistrtF' [Xiwfr
6ffi0 Brodt^,a,
Dernrs, cddado 80216
T€l€Pnonn (300) 297-1 192
Oarlicld CountY Buildine & Phnning
Attn: I?red Jarman
109 8m Strcst. Suite 301
Glenwood SPrings CO 81601
cc: Yarnashita
970 -285 - SO36
ffifi]flF]IVBD
JUt a e i/0r,2
"ffiE?fr:Hil#"
SincerelY,
John Broderick
District Wildlifc Manager -Parachutc
I;orWildlifi-
For PuPlc
Mr. Jarmm,
I have rcrriewcdthe pr.riminary plan application for the Monrrmcnt Ridge subdMsion arxl offer the
foUowing comnrnts:
The wildlift information arrd a-sscssrnent provided in the wildlife rcport is atrcurate and faetual' I agtee
ttnt thc most imJnrt*t ,rrunr* habitat irthc part of Morrumerr gulch th* runs through thc prttpcrty'
Monument gulch is a major wildlife r*r"rr,tit corridor on BattlJrrnt Mcsa' Thc gulch p'rovides good
scc,rity cowr atrd ha;iffi for many smallmaormal.r and songbirdr; but especially for mule decr'
I-),rring rcview of ttp sketch plan rh* cDow reconurrcmded that thc area of Monum€nr gulch that is uot
devclopablc be conservcd a-c open spffie for the dcvelopmeril' 'ttrc p'rcsrnt application lists n' acres for
opcll sPacc.
Establi.shing op€n spacc in Monument gulch would cotrpliment the existing open spac€ in Monument
Gur.hcrcated withthe Batrrcment Mesa puD. opcn $pace would herp prescrvc thc wildlife valuc ofthc
properry and would hclp mitigate trc -g,1mul51ive
impacts of ttrc PruPosd-devllopmcnt' Thc pmposed
covenants csr'rot a,snrne that thc wildlifn habitat *ouu bc prntocted and tlrat the furcortant vilues
idsilified in the wildlifc plarr are p'reserved or miligatal for'
Th CDOW recommends that thc fencc rs$lricttons includc: thal ttrc top and bottom wire bc barblcss'
that thc second wirc be at rcast re incrrcs uerow the top wirc, and that the bottour wire is at lcast sixtccn
inshes offthc ground. wc agrec that total fence hoffi slrould not exceed forty-two inches'
The coven0nr restricting tlogs eurtl ccts to the ptuperty.b good measuros that will benefit wildlitb' The
cDow is pleascd to ro thc weed conrrol arrd vegetation fllanagefiicDt plan integrated into the
Horneowner association elcrnents of ttrc covenants'
Tharrk you for the opportunity to comment. If I can bc of furttrcr assistarcc' pleasc call'
DEPARTMEHToFHATURALREsoTJRc€s,G]€gE.W#rEf,E)coli,eD-iEctDr-
WLDLFE CotrrleT$Sloi.l. Rht E rslEIll' Chat ' nJJ S-fto""tatJ, VicaSI,l* ' M#nrla R&pouh.E! S€crEtEry
Mgtt*r.'g.rnt6 561[ r Tom Btrilo r PhE Jsrnes ' Erd PhoE ' OIve Vatss
COTORADO GEOTOGICAT SURVEY
Division of Minerals and Ceology
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Street, Room 715
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: (303) 866-2611
FAX: (303) 866-2461
JuJy 24,2002
Fred Jarman
Garfi eld County Planning Department
109 Sth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Legal description:
SEY^SEY" ofSection 18,
E%NE% of Section 19,
and part of the NW% of Section 20,
T7S, R95W of the 6tr'P.M.
STATE OF CO
RECEIVED
JUL 29 2r/0?
CTqRFIELD COUNTY
Bt ILDING & PLJa.NNtNG
Subject:Review of Monument Ridge Subdivision Preliminary Plan
Garfield Countv. COt CGS flnique No- GA-02-0011
Dear Mr. Jarman:
Colorado Geological Survey has completed its site visit and review of the above-referenced subdivision.
I understand that the applicant proposes to create 17 single-family residential lots on this 182-acre parcel.
According to the Letter of Application (High Country Engineering, April 5,2002), the proposed water
service will be by individual or shared groundwater wells, and individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS)
are planned. I visited the site on July 1,2002.
We received the following reports with this referral: Geologic Evaluation and Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation by CTl/Thompson, Inc. (December 13, 2001) and Drainage Study (High Country
Engineering, November 28,2OOl). CTl/Thompson's geotechnical report provides a thorough description
ofexisting conditions, geology and geological hazards present at this site, and includes appropriate
preliminary recommendations for hazard mitigation, grading, building site excavations and fills,
foundation construction, floor systems and retaining structures. I have several comments regarding the
proposed development of this properfy.
1. Geologic hazards
CTl/Thompson identifies debris/mud flows and unstable/potentially unstable slopes as hazards that
will influence the location of building sites or will require mitigation. Risk of damage due to
geologic hazards can be minimized by delineating carefully considered building envelopes, and
incorporating these into the plat. Building envelopes should be located outside oJ the hazard areas
shown on CTl/Thompson's Geologic Hazards Map.
The large proposed lots, ranging in size from approximately 6.1to 12.7 acres, should allow sufficient
flexibility in the siting of building envelopes to avoid thebazard areas identified by CTl/Thompson.
Exceptions to this may be lots 1, 5 and 17. Large portions of these lots contain potential debris flow
hazards. On lots where "mitigation by avoidance" is not feasible, the following recommendations
should be adhered to:
If building envelopes are located within any of the mapped debris flow hazard areas, a drainage basin
hydrologic analysis will need to be performed to quantifl, the debris flowhazard and to design
mitigation. I agree with CTl/Thompson that mitigation can be achieved with careful site grading to
provide channelization and conveyance of debris/mud flows around and away from buildings, but the
size ofchannels and diversion structures should be designed based on a hydrologic analysis.
C:\Culson LURs\Garfield Monment Ridge.doc
07/24/02,4:58PM
DEPARTMENT OFNAIURAL
RESOIJRCES
Bill Owens
Covernor
Creg E. Walcher
Executive Director
Michael B. Long
Division Director
Vicki Cowart
State Ceologist
and Director
--i
F
Fred Jarman
Page2
JtlJy 24,2002
2. Access to lots llrl2 and 13
The Drainage Study states that "drainages will not be changed by the proposed development," but it is
unclear whether this statement refers to the drainage the runs between the southem edge of County
Road 300 and proposed lots 11-13. Driveway access to these lots should be designed so that this
drainage is not blocked.
3. Foundation design. Expansive and compressible soils are a concern in this area. CTLffltompson's
geotechnical report includes swell-consolidation test results for 6 samples, and describes the site's
clayey soils as moderately expansive to moderately compressible. I agree with their recommendation
for additional, designJevel geotechnical studies, once building locations are fnalized,to characteize
soil and rock engineering properties beneath each planned structure. This information is needed to
develop site-specific design recommendations and construction criteria. Soil conditions at planned
foundation depths will dictate whether overexcavation of compressible soils and placement of
structural fill will be needed, or whether footings with a minimum dead load will be needed to
counteract expansive clays.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have questions or need
clarification of issues identified dtring this review, please call me at (303) 894-2173, or e-mail
j ill.carlson@state. co.us.
Sincerely,
XkA6^-{tV
Jill Carlson, C.E.G.
Engineering Geologist
C:\Carlson LURs\Garfield Monument fudge.doc
07124/02,5:01PM
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENCINEER
Division of Water Resources
Department of Natural Resources
1113 Sherman Street, Room 8.18
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone (303) 866-3581
FAX (303) 866-3s89
www.water.state. co. us
STATE OF CO
July 12,2002
t&ffii(1ffi$vffitr)
JUL I I 2002
GAI{-IELD COUNTYt r.Dliil3 & PtAl$lttc
Bill Owens
Covernor
Creg E. Walcher
Executive Director
Hal D. Simpson, PE
State Engineer
Fred Jarman
Garfield County Planning Dept
109 8th St Ste 303
Glenwood Springs CO 81601
Re: Monument Ridge Preliminary Plan
Sections 18, 19 &20, T7S, R95W, 6TH PIM
W. Division 5, W. District 45
Dear Mr. Jarman:
We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide approximately 182 acres
into 17 residential lots. (The 182-acre parcel currently consists of 2 lots created as part of the 5-
lot Monument Ridge Exemption.) The water supply plan includes three remaining lots created as
part of the Monument Ridge Exemption. Water will be provided for a single-family residence,
2500 square feet of lawn irrigation and two livestock units for each lot. Total water demand for the
project is estimated at 12.23 acre-feet, with a consumptive use of 4.45 acre-feet, which increases
to 4.90 acre-feet when transit losses are included. The appli€nt proposes to provide water for the
residential lots through a combination of individual and shared wells pursuant to a contract with
the West Divide Water Conservancy District (the District). A copy of the contract was provided.
The applicant claims an interest in the water rights listed in Exhibit C of the Declaration of
Protective Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for the Monument Ridge Subdivision, which
have been or will be conveyed to the Monument Ridge Homeowners Association for irrigation
purposes. Sewage disposal is proposed to be provided through individual septic systems.
Our records indicate that well permit nos. 56566-F,56572-F, 56582-F, 56583-F, 57700-
Fthrough 57705-F were issued forWell Nos.2,8, 18, 19,5 and 21 through 25, respectively.
Review of the files verifies that the permits are valid for the proposed uses. Well tests
completed by Samuelson Pump Company between October 29,2001 and February 27,2002
for Well Nos. 2, 5, 8, 18 & 19 indicate that the production range was from 12.0 gpm to 14.3
gpm during four hour testing periods. lf the additional wells have similar production rates and
adequate storage capacity is provided, the water supply should be physically adequate to
supply the proposed uses. Please note that the long term adequacy of any ground water
source may be subject to fluctuation due to hydrological and climatic trends.
Based on the above, it is our opinion, pursuant to CRS 30-28-136(1Xh)(l), that the
proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights, so long as the
applicant maintains valid well permits per the District's Substitute Supply Plan, and is physically
adequate. Note that use of the irrigation water rights must not result in an expansion or change
of use, and approval of a change of water right application by the water court may be necessary
Garfield County Planning DePt
Monument Ridge Preliminary Plan
if the place or type of use is changed. lf you or the applicant has any questions concerning this
matter, please contact Craig Lis of this office for assistance.
Sincerely,
July 12,2002
Page2
/bD2ry
Kenneth W. Knox
Assistant State Engineer
KruKCMuMonument Ridge.doc
Alan Martellaro, Division Engineer
Robert C. Klenda, Water Commissioner, District 45
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
llil. 1 (i ?"002
3lll::ll,'fi-J?"':.",ffifi lE.88,Xlll,lh
Name of application: Monument Ridge
Sent to: Garfield CountfRoad and Bridge Dept.
Garfield County requests your comment in review ofthis project. Please notifr the
Planning Department in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline. This form
may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as
necessary. Wriuen comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: Fred Jarman
109 8tr" Stree! Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-3470
Phone: 970-945-8212
General comments: I have rwiewed this sftd
driveway locations and the lowering of County Road 300 to include the culvert extension
to extend from inside fence line to inside fence line. The lowering of County Road 300
provides for the visibility needed for Monument Ridge Drive. The culvert extension
eliminates the County's liability for the maintenance of the ditch and culvert.
I would also request that a minimum 60-foot right of way be deeded to the County
on both County Road 300 and County Road 303. It would be the responsibility of the sub
divider to set the fences back to the right of way.
I would recommend that a stop sign be installed on Monument Ridge Drive at the
entrance to County Road 300. The sign would meet the requirements of the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control devices.
I assume that there are no changes from the previous driveway location plan if
there are changes to the driveways I would need to review these changes
Name of review agency: Garfield County Road and Bridge Dept
Bv: Jake B. Mall Date: 711512002
Revised 3l3Ol0O
a
a,1!,
JUL-I7-02 [^IED 07:I7 AI'I HIGI' "IUNTRY ENGINEERING FA}( N0, g7n ^45 2555
...-) t:i (i1 )
I
March 8,2001
: t"
leter Heheman President,
Foothills Larrd & Dirieloptnont, [nc
l'9423 N. Turkey Creek Road, Suits B
. Monison, CO 80465
j.)
Dear Mr. Helnemal:
Thrr* you for yow letrer of March 5,
I
Thc long'standing poUcy of he Bsttlcment Mese MctropoUtan District is tlut no inclusions will
$ authorized. Ahhough the polioy has not bosn rc-visite0.tr ttre lsst sevcrEl years, tlrere ig no
r&asun ro believe th{_tfe poliay has chuged. Ttrs onty Esent dlscusSlon of tUC inituslon policy
t0cused on ability of Distrlot's intastrucuue to seryc i grooter amount of proporry trun cirneirly
committed hr servlce. I teporred t0 the Hoard that I belicved that lhc ssrvige drsa strould not bc
expandcd as thc cost to Incraase water and sewsi plant capaoiries w&r prohlbitlve, and was orre of
s;veral expensive problems to be resolved,.
't
Very truly yotlrs,
*ho"&,i-'R,
Brucc Smith
Distrlst Manager
cq: Board of Dircctors
I
;
:
:
P,O. BOX 6116, BATTT,EMENT MFSA, CO Et636 . (yl3) 2BS40S0
''':,:,'r r ,.'.
P.O. Box
Glenwood
THOMAS P.I}ALESSANDRT
Garfield County Sheriff
Date: June 25,2OOz
Telephone:
'il
SgcElvED JUN 2 7 NV2
I iA^A
l To:BuiHflrym'Ftr*ry ./-\ /
From: Jim Sears, Undersheri urht /)
Re: Monument Ridge Preliminary Plart)r/
The Sheriffs Office has reviewed the attached sketch plan for the Monument Ridge Preliminary
Plan and would like to address the following concerns. 1) The need to ensure all access roads are
of sufficient width to accommodate fire and BMS equipment 2) Any roads that are a dead end or
cul-de-sac type should have an ending radius large enough to accommodate fire or EMS
equipment's turn around ratio, 3) AII roads and roadways shall be clearly marked with correct
County road numbers and names. 4) All street addresses be clearly marked and visible from the
County road or access roads.
Fax: (970)945-6430
G ilrfutil C ounty S cfw o[ Disttilt No.
Dr. Steven A. McKee,
Rose H. Belden. Business
1970) 28s-77s9 FAX:(e70)28s-eg2t
JUL 1g 200?
sffiH8s$n['
July 18,2002
Garfield County Planning Deparhnent
109 8d'Steet, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of Garfield County School Distict No. 16, I would like to address the concerns of the school district pertinent to the
Monument Ridge Subdivision.
Although our school district welcomes the growth and development in our area, a major concern is the impact that such growth
would have on the school distict. The school district is requesting that the county consider imposing impact fees for this
subdivision. Recently, the electors voted on the school district bond to build a new high school and constuct an addition to the
elementary school to address the growth; however, with more and more subdivisions being created, the school district will have
to address overcrowding at the middle and elementary schools. The new high school was built to accommodate future growth.
Also, the school district would need to create an additional bus route, which would cost the district approximately $32,000.00
per year.
In addition, as this new subdivision is being planned and developed, a great consideration should be taken into account for the
condition of the existing roads, as well as, any new roads being constructed. Currently, County Road 300 has a significant
washboard surface, and in inclement weather, a slick muddy surface creates safety concems for our students being tansported
in buses. The school district would propose that County Road 300 be paved as a significant part of the development of the
Monument Ridge Subdivision. In addition, the 600-foot road with the cul-de-sac at the end should be paved to avoid future
problems and safety issues for the school district tansportation system and the community.
Furthermore, the school district has continually experienced diffrculty in the control of domestic animals on school distict
property. Our staff and students are put in danger each and every day at Bea Underwood Elementary with several dog bites
being reported this year. The district feels that appropriate actions on the part of Battlement Mesa and the County are not being
addressed. Thus, the concern rvould be with the proximity of the new subdivision is relation to the L.W. St Jobn Middle
School, which would also create an animal contol issue. This issue needs to be addressed.
Thank you for considering our concerns. If you have any questions, please contact me through the Central Administation
Offices at 970-285-7759, or written correspondence can be sent to P.O. Box 68, Parachute, CO. Also, please feel free to
contract me at my home telephone number at970-285-9034 or cell number at970-216-3816.
Sincerely,
fu/r,,fu,*
Mr. RonaldA. Palmer
Garfield County School District No. l6
Board of Education President
RAP/mmg
ADMINISTRATION OFFICES: 251 North Parachute Avenue, Parachute, Colorado 81635
MAILING ADDRESS: PO. Box 68. Parachute. Colorado 81635
REFERRAL FORM
Garfield County Planning Department
i09 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dal
Return Req
:' RECETVED JUL 0 Z Z00Z
Type of Application(s
StaffPlanner: Fted Jan:mn Phone: (970)945-82L2
Applicant: Foobtrills Land Derael
Contact Person: Pig|1 gqsl frrgineerjng, fnc.Phone: (970)945-8576
Location: CR.300 & cR.303, alcng the southeast lirnit of Battlenrent IEsa: Sl-8, 19, &20, T7S, R95hI
: L7 s/f lots cn L81.918 acres
0) 945-82128ax: (970) 945-7785
The Garfield County Planning Department has received a land use request as referenced above. Your comments
are an important part of the evaluation process. In order to review all appropriate agency comments and
incorporatethemintotheStaffReport,werequestyourresponseby%.
School District
Road & Bridge
Counry Attomey
2,;5$Z -llu,tta 1/lou^n- 7fhr24a,..ah vlrt t,{/, n)r,*^/)^'r ./,rllt,/ -,Uo1'n /iy'./),ra-/\ 7V//"
(1
COLOR,dDO,S.TATE
Water Resources BLM
Geolosical Survev (Fee)
Health Department
Forest Service (Fee)
lLritrilifa r\irrici
SEEvI€EiDJS:trRI€l:lI
U.S. West
Public Service
Holy Cross Electic
G. S./Carbondale Fire District
SiltAlew Castle/Rifl e Fire District
Plannine Commission
BOCC
File Name(s)Proiect Name(s)
Iffirunent Ridge $:bdiv:lsiryr Ivlmrunent Ri.dge Preliminary Plan
Phone:
lii
..:,:,:.,1i:il
I
I
IIIIEIIIITIIIIIIIIIIIII
FIESbUHCE
ENGINEERING INC
AU6 0 7 lr/,rt?
Mr. Fred Jarman
Garfield County Building and Planning Dept
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs CO 81601
RE: Monument Ridge Subdivision - Preliminary Plan Review
Dear Fred:
At the request of Garfield County, Resource Engineering, lnc. (RESOURCE) has reviewed
the preliminary plan submittal for the Monument Ridge Subdivision. The preliminary plan
application submittal is dated December 12,2001and was received by the County on June
21, 2002. We reviewed the technical issues related to water rights and water supply,
wastewater, drainage, geology/soils, wetlands, and roads. We conducted a field review of
August 2,2002. Our comments are presented below.
WATER RIG HTS/WATER SU PPLY
1. The proposed water supply is from shared wells. The submittal indicates that five
successfulwells have been drilled on the property. We recommend that individual
wells be drilled for each lot.
2. The legal water supply is based on a water allotment contract from the West Divide
Water Conservancy District. Contract No. 010531MRHA(a) has been obtained in
the name of Monument Ridge Homeowners Association.
3. The proposed subdivision is immediately adjacent to the Battlement Mesa PUD.
The submittal indicates the Battlement Mesa Metropolitan District (BMMD) will not
serve the proposed project. A copy of the letterfrom the BMMD should be included
for the record.
4. Fire protection for the project has been left up to the individual homeowners. We
recommend that the fire district, which will serve the area, be contacted for specific
requirements necessary for them to prcvide fire protection. lf on-site storage is
required, it should be constructed as a central facility and not be left up to the
individual homeowners. This is consistent with approvals for other subdivisions
within the County.
WASTEWATER
1. ISDS systems are proposed for the subdivision. Soil profile holes and percolation
tests indicate that conventional ISDS systems can be constructed within the
subdivision. The 10 t acre lots within the subdivision are adequate for use of ISDS
systems.
2. Similar to No. 3 above regarding water service by the BMMD, a letter from the
BMMD stating that they will not provide wastewater service to the proposed
subdivision should be submitted for the record.
Consulting Engineens and Hydnologists
9O9 Colonado Avenue I Glenwood Spnings, CO Ell601 a (970)945-6777 I Fax (970)945-1137
effitE?ffiilil.
RE
Mr. Fred Jarman
Garfield County Building and Planning Dept
Page 2
August 5,2002
IRRIGATION
1. A large portion of the project site has been historically irrigated, although in recent
years only a small portion of the property has been irrigated. Paragraph 3.d.1. on
page 6 of the Covenants attempts to define how the irrigation water will be used
within the subdivision. However, this section of the Covenants is very general and
vague and there is no clear understanding of how water is to be divided among the
lots. ln order to prevent future problems among lot owners, a more specific division
of water among the lots should be developed.
DRAINAGE
1. The drainage plan in this submittal indicates in one paragraph that detention will not
be required and in another paragraph indicates that detention will be required for
the additional developed flows. This issue needs to be clarified and the drainage
plan needs to demonstrate that it is in compliance with the Garfield County
Subdivision Regulations.
2. There is no analysis regarding the adequacy of the existing culverts, especially the
County Road 300 crossing of Monument Gulch.
3. As recommended in the CTL Thompson report, the drainage analysis must consider
the debris/mud flow and include a 40o/o to 50% bulking factor.
SOILS/GEOLOGY
1. The project site has several significant issues related to debris flow and unstable
slopes. Therefore, we recommend that building envelopes be developed for each
lot.
2. The site soils include expansive clays and compressible soils. ln addition, several
driveways must cross unstable slopes. A plat should be added to indicate that due
to geologic h:azardand soilconditions, site specificgeotechnicalengineering studies
must be completed for each lot.
3. The Monument Ridge Road cul-de-sac is located in the middle of a debris flow area.
The submittal should indicate that appropriate mitigation measures have been
designed into the grading and drainage plan.
VEGETATION/WETLANDS
The vegetation report does not identify the extent of wetlands and waters of the U.S. within
the property. This may be important as it relates to driveway crossings and building
envelopes.
::ii:FESOUFICEIIIIIrTT'TE N G I N E E B I N G I N C
Mr. Fred Jarman
Garfield County Building and Planning Dept
Page 3
ROADS
August 5,2002
The proposed common driveway access for Lots 3 and 4 appears to be too close
to the intersection of County Road 300 and County Road 303. This should be
addressed at final plat.
The proposed grading and drainage at the intersection of County Road 300 and the
proposed Monument Ridge Road should be reworked. The proposed grading
provides an adverse slope for northbound vehicles on County Road 300. The
culvert should be lengthened and moved further away from the intersection of
County Road 300 and Monument Ridge Road. A ditch will need to be constructed
on the downstream side of the culvert to convey flows to the existing natural
drainage.
There is an existing high spot in County Road 300 approximately 150 feet from the
90 degree bend and proposed intersection with Monument Ridge Road. This high
spot should be flattened out to improve site distance in this area.
The proposed common driveway access for Lots 12 and 13 is an existing ranch
road with also traverses Lot 1 1. lt is unclear why this road cannot also be used for
Lot 1 1 access.
Please call if you have any questions or need additional information.
1.
Sincerely,
RESOURGE NE NG, lNC.
MichaelJ..E.
Water Engineer
MJE/mmm
885-13.0 q monument ridge.EEs.wpd
CC: Roger Neal, High Country Engineering
!:!i:FlESOUFICErlallIIIIIE N G I N E E R I N G I N C
4.
!f- Box 1eo8
' 1Oo5 Cooper Ave.
Glenwood Springs,
co 81602
6rr ofl gERt r{ G (of{ gtLTAttls
June 12,2002
Mr. Scott Stevens
High Country Engineering, lnc.
1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Hand Delivered
RE: Monument Ridge Subdivision Preliminary Plan
Dear Scott:
Attached are the items which address the water supply concerns listed in the June 6,2002
letter from Fred Jarman of the Garfield County Building and Planning Department. The
items include:
1. A copy of our April 10,2002 water supply report for the Monument Ridge
Subdivision Exemption. This report should have been attached to the April 25,
2002 water supply reporl for the Monument Ridge Subdivision. Judging from Mr.
Jarman's concerns, the April 10 letter was apparently omitted from the Preliminary
Plan submittal.
2. A revised copy of Figure 2, the Well Sharing Map, from the April 25, 2002 water
supply report. Mr. Jarman indicated that the text on this figure was too small and
unreadable. I have enlarged the lot number text.
Mr. Jarman also asked about the status of the well permit applications for the proposed
shared wells. We submitted the applications on April 25,2002. The Office of the State
Engineer requires six weeks to respond to well permit applications. We expect a response
from them within the next few days. We do not anticipate problems with obtaining these
permits.
lf you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
Zancanella & Associates, Inc.
Bradley C. PeeK, Geologist
cc: Peter Heineman
Z:\21000\21802 Monument Ridge Sub\HCE-PrelimPlanAdditions.wpd
Z,lrcaxELLA /ND Asoqar6, r{(.
lOO YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN.
o
oE
E
E,
o
lrjzoFa
#25
#22
lOO YTAR
FL@D PI.AIN.
#23
tc
BASE FROTI HIGI{ COUNIRY ENqNTRING Sccd. In F.ct
WELL SHARING MAP MONUMENT RIDGE SUBDIVISION
RGURE NO.
SCA"E IDATEr' - 5oo, J UARcH 19, 2elli2
SHEEI:10Fl
PGT C't: E IE - IG CUE AVAN.EclErE ltircl ca.il^D n@ (rE) 9.s!rrD
ut(AwN tsY: lcFtKD EX IAPPD BYECP|BCPlrAz DRAUING
Sitr PlonzA.drg r,KUiJEgt:21EOz
ffiffi
#T
#21
B
(97O) 94€r-s70o
(970) 94at-1253 Fax. 'il%33;""'13".Glenwood SPrlngs'
co 81602
April 25, 2002
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Monument Ridge Subdivision
Dear Mark:
As you are aware the owners of the five lot Monument Ridge Subdivision Exemption wish
to subdivide the exemption lots #4 and #5 into at total of 17 additional lots. Figure 1
shows the general location of the property and the approximate locations of Wells #2,#5,
#8, #18, and #19, which have been drilled and tested. These wells were drilled to
demonstrate that an adequate water supply can be developed to serue the proposed
subdivision. The current exemption plan is for Lots #1 -#3 to be served by individualwells.
This method for water service for these three lots will not change.
Lot 1 1 of the new subdivision will be served by Well #8. The 16 remaining lots of the
subdivision are proposed to share six wells, Well #5 and Wells #21+25 will be covered
underwell sharing agreements. Figure 2 represents the lot and well sharing configuration
forthe new subdivision. These systems will be defined as non community bythe Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment, however, they are considered community
systems by Garfield County.
The developer will drill and test the shared wells and provide the required distribution
system piping to each lot. ln addition to the shared well system, each lot will have an
individual well permit for elective use by the future homeowner. The individualwell permit
will allow the future home owner the flexibility to explore the large lot at their discretion,
while still providing a tested water supply for each lot from the shared wells.
Water Requirements
Table 1 , attached, presents the diversions and consumptive use for the proposed 17 lot
subdivision. We have assumed that each EQR will represent 3.5 people using 100 gallons
of water per person per day. We have also included two livestock units per lot in the water
service plan. For our calculation, we have presumed that water will be diverted to irrigate
up to 2500 square feet of lawn or other equivalent outside uses at each lot.
Leqal Supply
As can be seen from Table 1, the 17 lot subdivision will divert an average 10.40 AF
annually, and consumptively use 3.79 AF. The peak month of July would require a
6rr on gEnN6 Cof{slJtTdr{ 15
ZatcaafluT Atro Assoqarg, NC.
*!
continuous average diversion of 9.5 gpm for all seventeen rots. Table 2 represents the
estimated water requirements for the 3 lot subdivision exemption. The exemption will
require diversions of 1.84 AF and will consumptively use 0.67 AF per yeat. Finally, Table
3 presents the total requirements for the combined 3 lot exemption and the 17 lot
subdivision for 20 units.
The propefty is located within Area A of the West Divide Water District and is eligible for
the District's temporary exchange plan approved by Garfield County and the Colorado
Division of Water Resources. A contract from the West Divide District for up to 20 EQRs
for a total of 4.90 acre feet, including transit losses, has been approved by the District.
This contract covers both the 17lot subdivision and the three lot subdivision exemption.
A copy of the West Divide contract is attached. lt is our understanding that the water
contract for both the exemption and the subdivision will be administered by one water or
homeowners association. Copies of thewell permit applications forthe shared wells, Wells
#5, #21, #22, #23 #24 and #25, for the proposed subd ivision are attached.
Physical Supply
We have attached a copy of our April 10,2002 report as evidence of a physical water
supply that will be available for the proposed new subdivision of the exemption lots 4 and
5 as shown on Figure A attached.
lf you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
Zancanella and Associates, lnc.
Attachments
cc: Peter Heineman
Z:\21 000\21 802 Monument Ridge Sub\Bean-Watersupply-All.wpd
2
Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E.
C.,, Geologist
.
T7S
t
Scdo In Fct
PROJECT LOCATION MAP MONUMENT RIDGE SUBDIVISION
EXEMPTION
RGURE NO.
SCAIE I DATE
1' = 20Od I APR|L 24 N2 SIIEET:l0F1
FC'GEEIE- IGMAq.E
alEE m, cEm .lE (ftrl a.r.@
DRAH EY:
BCP
crlxD EY: IAFFO EY:
BCP Ttlz
DRATITG:
l-ocTeodrg *nrles,, 21802
--r^4.
BASE FROI I-{IGII CqJilTRY EI{6NEEHilG Scdr ln Fat
,1OO \EAR
FLOOD PI-AIN.
B
_-/7,4t
o
oE
E,E
lct
lrlz.oFtn
,1OO Y€AR
FLOOD PLAIN.
#23
#21
#25
{#24
#22
WELL SHARING MAP MONUMENT RIDGE SUBDIVISION
RGURE NO.
2
FCITEEIE- tO!!Of flltr
a
E IIJAIE:t' = 50d I uARo{ 19, 2uor,.
$IET:
10F1
)RASI St ICHXD B\t IAPPO m
FI-N tth,fr;z
DRASile
S8ta PlcrZAdrg FROJECT: ,R(t,
Table 1 - Monument Ridge Subdivision
Estimated Water Requirements
Water Use Galculations
0.085
o.o77
0.085
0.082
0.085
0.082
0.085
0.085
0.082
0.085
0.082
0.085
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.30
0.45
0.48
0.41
0.28
0.11
0.00
0.00
2.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.57
0.13
o.12
0.13
0.31
0.44
0.sE
0.61
0.54
o.41
0.24
0.13
0.13
3.79
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.4
3.2
4.4
4.5
4.0
3.1
1.8
1.0
1.0
2.34
Pond Surface Area 0.00 acres
Annual Net Evaporation 2.91 ft
Livestock @ l5gaUday 2.00 units
gallons/daylunit 15.0o gallons
lrrigated Open Space 0.00 acres
Application Efficiency 70%
# of Commercial Units 0.0
# persons/unit 3.5
# gallons/person/daY 100 gPcd
Percent Consumed 15o/o
Lawn lrrigation 2500 sq-fUunit
Application EfficiencY 70o/o
of Residences 17.0 units
persons/residence 3.5 caplunit
gallons/person/daY 100 gPcd
nt Consumed 15o/o
lrrigation 2500 sq-fYunit
Application EfficiencY 70%
(8) (e) (10) (11) l12l (13) (14)
Domestlc Commercial Dom\Comm Open Space Llvestock Average
ln-house ln-house lrrigation lrrlgation Total Flow
(4) (s) (6) (7)
Domestic Gommercial Dom\Gomm Open Space Livestock
ln-house ln-house lrrlgation lrrigation Total Flow
0.566
0.511
0.566
0.548
0.566
0.548
0.566
0.566
0.548
0.566
0.548
0.566
6.664
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.43
0.64
0.68
0.59
0.40
0.15
0.00
0.00
3.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.049
o.o44
0.049
0.o47
0.049
0.o47
0.049
0.049
0 047
0.M9
o.o47
0.049
0.57
0.61
0.56
0.61
0.86
1.05
1.24
1.30
1.20
1.00
0.77
0.59
0.61
10.40
4.5
4.5
4.5
6.5
7.6
9.3
9.5
8.8
7.5
5.6
4.5
4.5
5.M
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
Decembel
Annual
o4t25t02 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES, lnc.Eqrusel 7Lots.123
Table 2 - Monument Ridge Subdivision Exemption
Estimated Water Requirements
Pond Surface Area 0.00 acres
Annual Net Evaporation 2.91 tl
Liveslock @ l5gallday 2.00 units
# gallons/daylunit 15.00 gallons
lrrigated Open Space 0.00 acres
Application Efiiciency 70%
# of Commercial Units 0.0
# persons/unit 3.5
#gallons/persory'day 100 gPcd
Percent Consumed 15o/o
Lawn hrigation 2500 sq-fUunit
Application EfliciencY 70Yo
'io reomnt (ClR) 2.27 ft
# of Residences 3.0 units
# persons/residence 3.5 caP/unit
# gallons/person/day 100 gPcd
Percent Consumed 15Yo
Lawn lrrigation 2500 sq-fUunit
Efliciency 7$o/o
Water Use Calculations
(8) (s) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
Domestlc Commercial Dom\Gomm Open Space Llvestock Average
ln-house ln-house lrrigation lrrigatlon Total Flow
(1t----- (r)' - (3) (41 (s) (6)
Domestic Gommercial Dom\Comm Open Space Liveslock Averag
ln-house ln-house lrrigatlon lrrigation Total Flow
(ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
0.10
009
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
1.18
0.00
000
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.o0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.08
0.1 1
0.12
0.10
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
o.01
0.01
0.10
0.11
0.10
0.11
0.15
0.18
o.22
0.23
0.21
0.18
0.14
0.10
0.11
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.1
1.3
1.6
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.8
1.84 1.14
January
Fcbruary
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
o.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.02
o.o2
o.o2
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.11
0.10
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.67
o.2
o.2
o.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.8
o.7
0.5
0.3
o.2
o.2
0.41
04t25t02 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES, lnc EQRuse-Exemp.123
# of Residences
# persons/residence
# gallons/person/day
Percent Consumed
Lawn lrrigation
Application EfficiencY
20.0 units
3.5 caplunit
100 gpcd
15o/o
2500 sq-fUunit
70%
2.27 ft
Table 3 Monument Ridge Subdivision
Estimated Water Requirements
Water Use
Water Use Calculations
0.100
0.090
0.100
0.097
0.100
0.097
0.100
0.100
0.097
0.'100
0.097
o.100
1.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.22
0.36
0.53
0.56
0.48
0.33
0.13
0.00
0.00
2.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
,0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.67
0.16
o.14
0.16
0.37
0.51
0.68
0.72
0.64
0.48
0.28
0.15
0.16
4.4s
1.1
1.1
1.1
2.8
3.7
5.1
5.3
4.7
3.7
2.1
1.1
1.1
2.7s
Pond Surface Area 0.00 acres
Annual Net Evaporation 2.91 Il
Livestock @ l5gaUday 2.00 units
# gallons/daylunit 15.00 gallons
lrrigated Open Space 0.00 acres
Application Efficiency 70%
lR) 2.21 tt
# of Commercial Units 0.0
# persons/unit 3.5
# gallons/person/daY 100 gpcd
Percent Consumed 15%
Lawn lnigation 2500 sq-fUunit
Application EfliciencY 70%
1a) 19 ttot (11) (12) (13) (14)
Domestlc Commerclal Dom\Comm Open Space Livestock Average
tn-house ln-house lrrigation lrrigation Total Flow
(ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac'ft) (ac-ft)
(6) (7)
Domestac Gommerclal Dom\Comm Open Space Llvestock Aver
ln-house ln-house lrrigation lrrlgation Total Flow
0 666
0.601
0.666
0.644
0.666
0.644
0.666
0.666
0.644
0.666
0.644
0.666
7.840
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.31
051
0.75
0.80
0.69
0.48
0.18
0.00
000
3.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.057
0.052
0.057
0.055
0.057
0.055
0.057
0.057
0.055
0.057
0.055
0.057
0.67
0.72
0.65
0.72
1.01
1.23
1.4s
1.s3
1.41
1.18
0.90
0.70
0.72
5.3
5.3
5.3
7.6
9.0
11.0
11.1
10.3
8.9
6.6
5.3
5.3
7.57
January
February
March
Aprll
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
25-Apr-O2
Zancanella & Assoc., lnc.
Waler Resources Engineers
Glenwood Springs, CO
Jobfl 21802 eqruse west div.wk4
Month
lac-ftl (ac-ft)(ac-ft)(ac-ft)
GOLORADO DIVISION OF WAIET< I<EsOUR,CEs
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOTI-'ES
1313SHERMANST., RM818, DENVI O EO2O3
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) o-r3581
fax (303) 866-3589 http://www.water.state. co. us
Ottlce Use Unly I form GWS4S (1/2OOl)
GENER^AL PURPOSE
Water Well Permit Application
Rcview instructions on revente side prior to completlng form.
The form must be completed in black ink.
1. Applicant lnformation 6. Use Of Wel! (check applicable boxes
Name of applicant
Monument Ridge Homeowners Association
c/o Peter Heineman
Attach a detailed description of uses applied for.
E lndustrial [l Ottrer (describe): Domestic
flMunicipal
! lnigation
fl Commercial
i/tailing address
19423 N. Turkey Creek Rd., Ste. B
City i state i zlp codeMorrison iCO 180465
Telephon€#
(303) 697-0678 Maxirum pumping rat6
15 spm
Annual amunt to be withdrawYr
12.23 Cumulative acre-feet2. Type Of Application (check applicable boxes)
E] Construct new well EI Use existing well
I Replace existing well [l Change or increase use
EI Change source (aquifer) tr Reapplication (expired permit)
E other:
r ouil oePtn
95 feet Wasatch
8. Land On Which Ground Water Will Be Used
Legal Description (may ba provided as an attaclrmentf Sgg AttaChgd
3. Refer To (if applicable)
Well pemit #
56569-F
Water Court casa #
O6ignated Basin Deteminalion #Well nam6 or #
Monument Ridge Well#5
4. Location Of Proposed Well
County
Garfield NE 1/4 orrhe NE 1t4 A, r Acres
200.0
B. orner
Foothills Lanc & DevelopmeSeclion i Tomship N or S1e iz tra
Rangs Eores tra
mnepal Meridian
6th C. List any otherw€lls orwaterdghts used m this land:
9. Proposed Wel! Driller License #(optional
Distance of uell fmm section lines (sedion line. are tyPically not Ptopeny lin$)
620 er.rro,nENES 920 Ft.rromBEEW
For replacemetrt urells only - distancs and direclion from old rell to na!f, wsll
feet direction
10. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Authorized Agent
wdl location address (if applicable)degree, which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S.
24+104 (13Xa). I have read the statements herein, knor the contents
thereof and state that they are true to my knowledge.
signature)
g title
Use6nlyOffice
Optional: GPS well location information in UTM format
Required settings for GPS units aro as follows:
Fod€t rrust be UTM
Zone rrust bo 13
Units rflJst be Mcters
Darum mrst be NAO27 (CONUS)
Unit mrst be sel to true nonh
were points averag"or EYes E r.ro
Northing
Easting
USGS mp natrE OWR rr€p no.elev
5. ParcelOn Which WellWillBe Located
A. Legal Description (nray be provided as an attzrcfiment):
Monument Ridge Subdivision
area only
WE
WR
cwcB
TOPO
MYI.AR
S85
B. #of acres in parcel
200.0
C. owner
Foothills Land & Development
D, will this be the only well on this parcEl? EvgS EIr.rO ru no - list othcr lyells)
E. State Parca lD* (optional):
I
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM 818, DENVER, CO 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) 8' -81
tu* ?303) 866-3589 htb://wwv.water.state.
GENERAL PURPOSE
Water Well Permit Application
Rcview instructions on reverso sido prior to completing form.
The form must be completed in black ink.
1. Aoolicant lnformation 6. Use Of Well (check applicable boxes
Nafir oa applicant
Monument Ridge Homeowners Association
c/o Peter Heineman
Attach a detailed description of uses applied for.
! lndustrial [l Otner (describe): Domestic
I Municipal
[tlnlgation
E Commercial
irarling addrcas
19423 N. Turkey Creek Rd., Ste. B
r State r Zip code
Morrison CO : 80465
Tdc9lrm. #
(303) 697-0678
Malrrum punprng rate ___ I Ann*,
"rIEUnt
to bc
15 oom I t2.23 Cumulative acre-feet7. Type Of Application (check applicable boxes)
Total de$h I ooru,
200 s""1 I Wasatch
Legal Descnption (rEy bc provided as an atrachm€r!0: Monument Ridge
Subdivision
(lf used for crop inigation, attach a scaled map that shows inigated area.)
A. *Acres lB. omer200.0 I Foothills Land Development
[t Construct new well ! Use existing well
E Replace existing well fl Change or increase use
! Change source (aquifeo D Reapplication (expired permit)
E]ottren
3. Refer To (if applicable)
wdl gefmt #Water Court caso f
oeignateoEasrn Determnatlon *Well nam€ or f
Monument Ridge Well#21
4. Location Of ProPosed Well
County
Garfield SW 1/4of rhe NW it4
-SGm-tomsnlp N or s20 ,7 tra
Range Eorw ; Prinopal Meddian
95 tra i6'n C. Lisr any other wells or ,rrats rights used on this land:
-Oistaocc ot wat trod sldion line3 (s€ction line3 ara h/pically not property lines)
1620 Ft.rromENES 445 Ft.rmmQEEW
For replec€flEnl rclls only - distance and dircclion from old well to nelx well
feet direction
10. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Authorized Agent
The making of false statements herein @nstitutes penury in the second
degree, which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S.
244-104 (13)(a). I have read the statements herein, know the contents
thereof and state that they are true to mv knowledge. .
Sign trere (mrE oa oagrhr, signature) : Oato
zZlal
Office Use Only
-USGSn€9 narrc : OwR r€p no. ; Surface erev.
:i
BA MO
Weil locauon addcss (if applrcable)
Optlonal: GPS well location information in UTM format
Required settings for GPS unats are as follows:
Fofliatrn st be UTM ;
Zonr flrst bc 13 Northing
Units mrst be Meters
OafiJm rrusl be NAOZT (CONUS)
Unri rnr$ be set to lrue north i Eastino
wefc aornts averag.or lves I r'ro
5. Parcel On Which WellWill Be Located
A. Legal Descnption (ngy ba provided as an attachmeni):
Monument Ridge Subdivision
2OO.O I Foothills Land Development
o. will this ba rhc only wcll on thi3 parccl? EYgs EIruo tir no - list oth.f w€lls)
E. s!.to Parcel lt,t(odional):
WE
WR
cwcB
roPo
MYI.AR
SB5 otv WO
OEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM 818, DENVF- ':O 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) 581
fax (303) 866-3589 htb:/li,rww.water.state..-'us
GENERAL PURPOSE
Water Well Permit Application
Review instructions on rsverse side prior to completing form.
The form must be comploted in black ink.
1. Apolicant lnformation 6. Use Of Well (check applicable boxes
Naflr of applicant
Monument Ridge Homeowners Association
c/o Peter Heineman
Attach a detailed clescription of uses applied for.
EI lndustrial EI Otner (describe): Domestic
! Municipal
E lnigation
! Commercial
IllailinE addruss
19423 N. Turkey Creek Rd., Ste. B
City
Morrison
State i ap codeco i 80465
Tdcdrona #
1303t 697-0678 ffi
't E g'm
IJ
{nnu6l arnount to be wthdrawn
12.23 Cumulative acrs.feet2. Type Of Application (check applicable boxes)
[l Consrua neu, well E Use existing well
I Replace existing well I Change or increase use
! Change source (aquife0 tr Reapplication (expired permit)
EIoner:
200 feet
8. Land On Which Ground
Legal Description (nEy be pmuded as a
Wasatch
-;-
Water Will Be Used
'"@
3. Refer To (if applicable)Subdivision
Well pemt *Water Court cas6 r
-EFgnauo Basin oeiermneion *Well na,n6 or #
Monument Ridge Well#22
4. Location Of Proposed Well
County
Garfield SE 1/4 orrhe NE tt4 A. # Acres
200.0
B. omer
I Foothills Land Development
seaion
-,
riimsnio N or s
19 ,7 trE
Range Eorwe5 trtr
Principal M.ndian
^tho
List any othcr we[s or waler rights us€d on this land:
9. Proposed Well Driller License
SBlance of Ell from scdion lines (sadion line3 ara rypically not property lines).1345 Ft.rromfiNtrS 490 Ft.rrmrBEEW
@ce and direction lmm old well to new well
feet direction
10. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Authorized Agent
The making of talse statements herein consftutes periury in the second
wdl locaom address (if apcrcable)clegree, which is punishable as a
24+104 (13)(a). I have read the
lass 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S.
itatements herein, know the contents
r to mv knoa/edqe.
I
Optlonal: GPS well location information in UTM format
Required settings for GPS units ara as follows:
(Must be oa?rh., $gnarure)
FomEt rrust b6 UTM
Zon. ,rust be 13 Northing
UnitJ mJst bo Motc's
oarum mJsr be NAO27 (CONUS)
Unit nilsl be sei to ttuc nonh Easting
were polnc ave69"oz Eves D Ho
=-TL.,.r,ss f* 1 o*-."co,,ae,,tAq ''{[z2loZ
Print name & title
uSGS rmp narne r owR n€p no. ; Surlace elev.tl5. Parcel On Which WellWill Be Located
A. Legal Description (tr€y be prouded as an attadrffir):
Monument Ridge Subdivision
area only
WE
WR
cwcB
TOPO
MYTAR
sBs olv_ wO- BA- MO
-
B. * ol ".r"s
,n pa*d i C. ormer
200.0 i Foothills Land Development
D. will this b6 rh. only w.tl on thi3 parcd? EvgS EIHO tit no - list other w€llr)
E. Starc Parca lo, (oglional):
a
UEI'AI(IMtrNI UT NAI
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM 818, DENVER, CO 80203
ohone - info: (303) 866'3587 main: (303) 81 31
?a* &og) goe-gsgg n$y^,,r,,vw.water.state.,
GENERAL PURPOSE
Water Well Permit APPlication
Review instructlons on reveGie side prior to completing form.
The form must bo completed in black ink.
1. Applicant lnformation 6. Use Of Well (check applicable boxes
Nan€ o, applicant
Monument Ridge Homeowners Association
c/o Peter Heineman
Attach a detailed description of uses applied for.
EI lndustrial El Ottrer (describe): Domestic
E Municipal
fi lnigation
E Commercial
7. Wetl Data (proposed)
Mailing addflss
19423 N. Turkey Creek Rd., Ste. B
Er-- Islate izpcodcMonison lco iao+os
-raaphono "
t3031697-0678
@nual armunt to ba Hthdrawt
15 sem I 12.23 Cumulative acre-feet
t::
Total dePth I Aqulier
2OO ,.., I Wasatch
Legal DescnpUon (rnay be proMded a3 an attachmntl: Monumgnt Ridge
Subdivision
ZJype Of Application (check aPPli
El Construct newwell EI Use exisung well
I Replace existing well E Change or increase use
! Change source (aqutfer) EI Reapplication (expired permit)
E other:
3. Refer To (if apPlicable)
Well permif Water Coud case #
Well namc or #
Monument Ridge Wett #23
4. Location Of Proposed Well that shows inioated area.)
County
Garfield NW 1/4 or the NW 1t,A. fAcres iB. owner
200.0 I Foothills Land Development
ffi---Iffish'p Nors
ZO tT trA
Range EorW i PdnoFElMndian
95 trEl l6'n C. List any other wells or water rights us€d on this land:
TEtancfiiudiffi s€don linen (seaion lines a.r tlDl€lly not prcpeny lin€xr)
960 Ft.rromENES 60 Ft.rrom[EBW 9. Proposed Well Driller License #(optional
@;edion from old well to nu w€lt
feet direction
10. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Authorizeq 4gen!-
degree, which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S.
24+104 (13Xa). I have read the statements herein, know the contents
-Wal locat on address (if apPlicable)
Optional: GPS well location information in UTM format
Required settings for GPS units are as follo,t s: .
Fofl€t mJ$ be UTM
Zona mJst ba 13
Units mrst be McleG
Northing
Datum.rust be NAO27 (CONUS)
I
Unit mlst.be sel to trua nonh Easting
wer6 poinrs averag"or Eves E r'ro
Signherc(Mustb6oagm.rsignature) r uatG
'Tt^",^
^:., + Z---o^ -V\", ltasJoz
Pdni nam & title
5. Parcel On Which WellWill Be Located
A. Legal Descnption (nEy be prouded as an atlachtrent):
Monument Ridge Subdivision
, Receipt area only
WE
WR
OrvCB
TOPO
MYI.AR
s85 0rv WO BA MO
B. rof acres rn parcet i C. omer
2OO.O : Foothills Land DeveloPment
o. wirl this bc thc only mll on thB parcd? Evgs ElHo tit no - list olh.f u€lls)
E. stats Parca lo*(oorimal):
attach a scaled
thereof and state are true to
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM E18, DENVEP 'O 80203
phone - info: (303) 86&3587 main: (303) i81
hx: (303) 866-3589 httpj/ ,vwlq!E!C1,:tate==.i!.
GENERAL PURPOSE
Water Well Permit APP|ication
Review instructions on rovorco side prior to completing form.
The form must be completed in black ink.
Monument Ridge Homeowners Association
c/o Peter Heineman
19423 N. Turkey Creek Rd., Ste. B
Monison iCO i80465
(303) 697-0678
ZfvpeOrAPP|icatio@
[t Consrruct newwell ! Use existing well
! Replace exisUng well ! Change or increase use
! Change source (aquifer) tr Reapplication (expired permit)
3- Refer To (if aPPlicable
I
I
I
I Monument Ridge Well#24
Well---T-
I
iSE
;
i
NorS i Rangatra igs
Eor
tr
I
I
;f $dl from seclion liner ftection lines are typi€lly not Prcporty linc5)
O Ft.rromENBS 50 Ft.rrornEEEW
@irection lrom old w€ll to ne{vwell
feet direcuon
Optional: GPS well location information in UTM format
Required settings for GPS units are as follows:
.Fomt flilst be UTM
ZonrmI$be 13
Units iliJsl be Meiers
oeturn mJsl be NAo27 (coNus) |
Unri mlst be sei to true nonh I Easting
wefe pornts averageor EYgs E r'ro
5. Parcel On Which WellWill Be Located
A. Legal DeSCfiption (n€y be prouded as an altacfin?ni):
Monument Ridge Subdivision
B. *o,acr$rnpatcel :C. omer
2OO.O I Foothills Land Development
D. witt this be th6onlyudl on thisparcel? Evgs ElHo (itno-listothers€lls)
check boxes
Attach a detailed description of uses applied for.
E lndustrial Elother (describe): Domestic
! Municipal
fi tnigation
E Commercial
7. Well Data (proposed)
MarimJm purping rai6 I15 spm
II
12.23 Cumulative acre-feet
Annual aflpunt to bo
depth
200 ,"", i Wasatch
8. Land On Which Ground Water Will Be Used
Legal Description (,nay be provided as an auadrnenrtr Mon ument Rid ge
Subdivision
attach a scaled map that shows
A, #A6es
200.0
; B. ourer
i Foothills Land Development
C. Ust any otherwells or rtaler nghts ussd on lhis land:
9. Pro Wel! Driller License
10. Signature Of t(s) Or Authorized Agent
ftre mifing of false statements herein constitutes pedury in the second
degree, which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S'
244-104 (13Xa). I have read the statements herein, know the contents
thereof and state that they qrq !rve !q
Sign herc (Must be )
al.o A-Z
name & tiu6
Office Use Only
USGS rnap name OWR llrap no.Suriace elev.
I Receipt area only
i
i
:
:
!
otv_ wo_ aA_ i/lD _
I
uErAFrl luElr 1 vr l!^
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM 818, DENVER' CO 80203
ohone - info: (303) 86&3587 main: (303) I 18't
iax 1 gog) 86&3589 http:/4,$,t/w.water.state.ry
GENERAL PURPOSE
Water Well Permit APPlication
Review instructions on revenio side prior to completlng form.
The form must bs comploted in black ink.
1. Applicant lnformation 6. Use Of Well (check ;able boxes)
s applied for.
oe): Domestic
T5fr-of aggticant-
Monument Ridge Homeowners Association
c/o Peter Heineman
Attach a detailed description of user
! lndustrial EI other (descri
I Municipal
[t lnigation
! Commercial
@
Mailing addruss
19423 N. TurkeY Creek Rd., Ste. B
-it- I stale ziP code
Morrison ICO i80465
Ecffrofta#
(303) 697-0678
Marnum pumprng iata
15 spm
{nnual anEunt to ba withdtawr
12.23 Cumulative acre-ieet
ZJype Of Application (check applicable boxes)
ToEr deplh I Aquler
2OO 1""1 | Wasatch
Legal Descnption (nray be troudrd as an atlachnrcnt), Monument Ridge
Subdivision
(lf used for croo irnqation, attach a scaled map that shows inigated area.)
A. *e"t"" I B' omer
200.0 I Foothills Land Developmen
I
[t Construct newwell E Use existing well
E Replace existing well D Cnange or increase use
E Cnange source (aquifer) E Reapplication (expired permit)
EIofrren
3. Refer To (if apPlicable)
Well permt s water Coun case #
Well na.ne or #
Monument Ridge Well#25
4. Location Of ProPosed Wr
County
Garfield SE r/4 or the SE 1t4
il
Sffio.r
--Iown*xp
N or S
18 i7 trE
Ranqe EorW i PnnopalMefidianes trE io*c. List any oth6 \,t6lls or watef righut us€d on this land:
9.Well Driller License #(oPtional
ffion lines arc tygcally not gropetly tine3)
865 Fr.rromENBS 575 Ft.rromEEEW
@a direciion from old well to nerv Y€ll
feet direction
10. Signature Of Applicant(s) Or Aulhortzeo.agent
,
fre mariG-tEfe sutements herein consututes periury in the second
wA loca[m address (rf applicable)degree. which is punlshaDle as a dass I mlsoemeanor pursuant to u'r\'
24+104 (13)(a). I have read the statements herein, know the contents
Optonal: GPS $rell location information in UTM format
Required settings for GPS units are as follows:@) oate
Print narne & title
Office Use OnlY
uSCS-map nam€- ' DwR rnap no. I surlace elev'
Foflrat mlst be UTM ,
Zone rrust bc 13 . f.torthing
unrB nust bc Metors
oatum mrst be NAO27 (CONUS)
Unit rrusl bc set to trua no(rh ; Easting
wefe poinis averaqeoz Evgs E No : -
5. Parcel On Which WellWill Be Located
A. Legal Description (nray be provided as an attachffil):
Monument Ridge Subdivision
B: ilof acres in parcel , C. omer
200.0 Foothills Land DeveloPment
D. Will this be rne only well on this parcel? EvgS ElnO (if no - lisl other w€lls)
WE
WR
cwcB
roPo
MYIJR
s85 wo_ BA_ MO _
area only
E. Statc Parcel lO, (oplional):
that thev are
Date Acrivared OS/31/Ot
r^iEST DIVIDE WAIER CONSER\rA}IC( DISTRICT
IdATER ATLOTT4EI{IT CONTRACT/ LEASE
rlame Dr AoPlicrnc: -USru.Bg.at Ridge. HOmeorsners Assn
a-qn AF
cl,o-Let-er-Eqi-o.e-u.an
.,Juannt'/ or liacer in Acre Feec:consumdtive use
Aoplicant. hereoy appi ies uo Ehe Hest Divide flaEer Conseflrancy 0istrrc:. a politlcal subdiviston of the SLate
:r Coloraoo. organtzed pursuant Eo and ex'istrng by virtue or C.R.S. 1973. 537-45-101. et seo.. (hereinafter referred Eo as
:re .tisi;-lcE") ior an allocnpnt contract/lease to benefioally and perpecually useriater orwater rights owned. leased. or
:lerearter acqulred by the District,. By execuuron oi Lhis contra$/lease and the aEtached application. rtpplicant hereoy agrees
;o ihe iollowing c,arms and condittons:
.
L. itarer t'{johts: ADplicanE shall oran warer crgnts at ihe poinc or diversion herein iawiuily anctcling
..,00t tc3nc io oivert ,raEer.. /rnicn wi ll be suooletented and augflEnf,eo by waEer leased heretn. If Aoplicant inEenos Eo diverE
:rrougn,t ^eil it rnust be unoerstood oy Applicant LhaE, no cignc lo oivert exists unciI a valid'neil permtt is ooEaineo ircm
:ne a.oioraoo Civt sion of l'tarcr Resources.
?. ()uancit.r: l,tauer aoplied for by the loplicanc in the arDunc set iorth above snali be diverred ac
topiicanE's poinr of d'iversion from Ehe oi.str]ct's direcl flow water rignts. ancl ,nnen warcr is unavailable ior diverston
.lursuanE [o aomlnistra['lon oy the Colorado SLate Engineer durtng periodswnen said direct l]owwater rrght is not, in prlorlt'/.
-.lte Utscrrcs snall reiease ior Lhe use of Aoplicant uo to said quanEity in acre feec per year of storage ',.,ater oh,neo ,1r'
:oncroileo oy ;he rJisci.icr. [t is unoerstooo that any quancity ailotted irom direcc flow. storage or ocnertdlse. Eo i:he
.rooi rclnr. oy iIe Disrrtct'irll be iimlteo by the prlorlty or Ehe oisiricE,'s decrees ano oy [he 2nysical ano !egal avatlaol I lt'i
.t. ,vilc€c rrem ;isirrc!'s sources. Any quan[iUy allocteo wilI only be provl6eo so iong as'//aEer is available :no [he AoOlicanc
-'tilv r;cmoii.es ."lr.h .iil ()r ihe r.erms and conoltrons of ihis conEnacE/lease. The Disirlct,'lnd Ehe Aoolicanc reccgnlze chaE
-,ome r-rr ihe Dis[r1cE 5 decrees may be in the narp of Lhe Coloraoo River'iJaEer Conservacion Distrlct. ano lhe ablll[y or :he
jlsir:c: t-.0 aiior direcc f"low r.rghc to the Aoplicanc may De Cecendenc on lhe consenc.Ji ;he Cclorado River l.later Conseri/aL:cn
)tSi.i-:c:. ii ic any r:trne;he Applicanc derermines iE cequrces Iess',aLer Ehan [he arDun[ hereln provided. ..ioplicanc may ;o
.loll i.r '.he i)iscrrcr, in wri clng, ilnd [,he afipunc of ,lacer allotted under ihls conEracE,llease snall be reduceo permanencl'/ :n
.cc?i.ila,lc3 .vri1 sUCil noctce. Races snall oe ro.lusteo accorolngly in iollowtng lracer -rears oniy.
ilenericial ttse anri toeacion of ieneiic:al llse: Any and all r"acer. ailot'"ed Aoplicanc oy i.he i)rscrrc:
:nali te ,iseo -or ihe i0 llo\,.lng oenetictal use or uses: munlclpal. donestic ano celace,J uses. I)r (jotlllErc:al (e.rceoU :o ihe
i;(Cenr. :naL lue.:i i,eservoiilnracer may noE be avai laOle i'or conrrcrcial aS r.haE ierm iS cerjned on Page 5 of CcnCraCl tlo. l-.li-
;'0-yt054i Der-,^€en ihe UnrteC SLaEes ano [he xest, Divioe later Conservancy District,) Aoplicanc's benetic:al use or any ano
tii ,vacer illocieo snail be',.rithrn oc i,hrougn iac:lit,:es or rroon land owned. leased. loeraEeC. or unoer Aooiicanc s conErci.
r. Oecrees and Celiverv: E,rchange releases maoe ily Lhe [)isLtlcE out of storage inom Rueoi Reservorr
-,nd {jr.een Houncaln Reservorr. or oEher'/orKS or lactl it,:es or i,he 0isErlcg. or irorn other sources avat lable lo Lhe Ilistrlc:.
,ndri ,.le uet ryered r.o che AoplicanE ac ihe cruclec ,norxs ot said scorage iact li[tes or a[ Ehe decreeC potnc oi Olverston ior
:at(l ocnef rources. and ce{ease or clelivery of 'rater aE suclt ouclec or polnEs shall constiEuEe oerfornance of E,he 0tscrrc'. :
io[al rollgac]on. Delivery of waEer by Lhe OistricE from Ruedi Resenroir or Green t'lounf,ain Reservoir shall be suo;eci ro
.'.he liistrlcE : lease concracts u.ith lhe Unlted States Bureau of Reclamacton. Releases from or,her faciliEies ,tvatlaole :c
0isLricc hereoy expressly reserves Lne I-rglrt
or conErolled by the gistrict in [he E ',rre. so long as Bhe waEer service to Ehe ^',]licant pursuant Eo Ehis agrcenent. is
rroi imparred by said action. Any qu- y of the Applicant's allocation not del $ io or used by ApplicanE by the end
oi aac!: .,.cer year (october L). shall reverr to Ehe water sr.rpplies of Ehe 0istrict. Such reversion shall noE entitle
,toplicon[ to any refund or payrnent made for sucfl l'/aEer'
,ilacer service provided by the oistrict shall be Iimited to fie arDunt of waEer available in prioriLy aE, the
.trrgrnal pornt of.Jivers.ion of the District s dpplicable water right. and neither uhe 0istricE. nor those entilled co uEi'lize
cne DrsEi.rc! s deci.ees. may call on any greacer afi)unE at ne,{ or alternate points of diversion. Ihe 0istrict. shall requesc
;he colorado Divis:on ol HaEen Resources to estimate any conveyance losses bec"'een Ehe original poinE, and any alternate 9oinE.
:no suc:l ?Sctmace snall 5e deoucted irom Ehts aflEunt in eact case.
5. Alternate point of liversion and Plan of Auorenration: oecrees for alternace points of diversion
cr rne DisEr.lcE's,../aEer rights or storagedaEermay be cequrreo in ordec forApplicant to use thelraEer service concemolateo
xereunoer. obcaining sucn decree is Ehe e,rciusive responsibilrty of lpplicanc. ihe Oistrict reser'/es the right lo re'rie;r
,ino doprov€ any conditrons.,nmich may be attacned uo iudic:al approval of satd alternate poinc or oiversion as conteflplaEeo
i)r necessary Eo serve Aoplicanc's facililies or iands- Aoplicant acknowledges and agrees ihac it shall be solely resoonsible
ior the proceoures and Iegal engrneering cosEs necessary for any changes in'rater cignts conielo-laceo heretn' and furuher
ngrees r.o-indernriy Ehe Distrrcr from any cosEs or losses nelaced thereEo. Applicanc is solely cesoonsible for orovto'ing
^orxs and iactliLtes necessary Eo obEain/divert Bhe wacers aE said alEernaEe potnt of diversion and deliver Ehem Eo
:0oiicanE s rncenoeo benericial use. [rresoeccrve of |,he am]unc of water accually [i'ansierreo il ihe Applicanc's poinc cr
rlrversion. l--he Aoolicanc snall make annual paynents to uhe 0'isEI'ict Daseo upon lhe arDunt, of :'Jauer ailorued under Ehls
concracE/ I ease.
in Ehe evenu Bhe AppljcanE inteflds Lo aoply for an alternate poinc of diversion and to oevelop an
augmenEatron plan and inscituLe legal proceeoings for Ehe approval of sucn augmntaElon plan Eo allortheAoplicanu ['o uE'iljze
;he,raEerallocteoto-Appiicanc,hereunder. uheApplicanEshallgrveEheDistrlct'rrittennociceorsucnintenc. [nE'heevent
:he AopiicanE develoos ano aoJuoicates its olin auglEnEatlon plan Eo uE'llize uhe water ailotteo hereunder' Aoplicanc shall
roc 5e oollgated:o pay any anpunt under paragrapn L9 below. In any evenE. Ehe DisErlcE shall have ihe rtgnB i0 approve or
rllsaporove ine Aoolicanc's duglEntatlon plan ano l,he Aoplicanr shall provioe the Dis[rlc'- cooies of sucn 2lan'mo oi rll
rieaoings ano ocner 2aoers fileO with the'/iaEer C6urt in the adiu6iCatiqn thereor'
- .-r. ,-'onrr.rct/tease pav,renr,: Non-cefunoaole. one:irne aciminisE,ra[jve c,large. ]n:he arDunt uetermlneo
,)v ;ne 3oac0 lrl,-.i,.eerors or Ehe DiS[,riCt ir.cm Einre lo -uirne. snall be suo{nl[iec'dim :he aoplicrcton ior constoeraclon 0y
-.ne i.l I stl': c:.
-.xa L :he
rfllCO ll€
-nnuai paymenc for ihe,,{acer:errrce oesc;.tceo herern snail re oeEeFnlneo by ;he 3oarc cr Dineciors 'i)r ;he
-!1s rniriai rnnuai DaymnE shail ie $aoe in iull. ,,richin mirty (30) days arter i.ne daEe oi roc:ce io ine AgoilcanE
nrc:ai ,.aynenc ls oue. Satd noctcg,rrll ,lclvrse ihe Aopircant. nmong ocher :hlngs. ,:f :he.'iacer ceiiver'1 leac'-c
,nr[iai paymnE snail aOply anO;he Drice'rntcn is aOpiicaOie'"0 lhaE, /ear.
..nnual laymencs ior eacn./ear ihereafter:hall :e cue and payaole cy r.he ioolicrnc cn Dr Jerore ?ac:i
,anuorT i. :i .in;nnuai fayfiEnE is not, maoe cy che oue oaEe a flac 550 iace ;ee'rill be assesseo' iinai ,Jrttten noctce grtoc
-c ,.:ilncz! lar,ron ,i l l be :ent certrfied mai l . re[urn feceipc .eguesteo. io ihe Aopl icant aE such adoress as nay ce oeslgnacec
t)y i.ne -\oolrcJnL 'n tdrittng or se[ iorch rn i:his con[ract,/lease or aooiicacton. i'lacer use for any ,ar[ oi a'"acer .'ear snati
r.ecurre payrrEnc ior ihe encice,/.at,er year. )loEhrng herein snall be conslrued so as io prevenE ;ne 0iscrlcE, rrom ao.lusi:ng
'.he.nnual .ace tn ics Sole Ciscrecton for:uture years oniy.
lf Daynenc is noE made withrn Fifteen (15) rlays after [he rjaLe of salo',ir]lEen nocica. AoplicanE snall ac
r')lscrrc['s sole ooc.lon have no iurther nrghE,. [,'ll,le or rnceresc unoer Ehis concracr/lease'dlthout, iurEher nocice. and ueltver."
J L LIIS u I Jur qs tvi'
upon cancellacion of i,,€cer allotnent concract/lease with u stricL. the 0istrict shall notify rhe
Divrsion or ,Jater Resources offices in 0enver and Glen'rood Springs. The 0ivision o, ,.dEer Resources rmy tfien order cessatlon
Jf .t i I naEer use.
^ rr:Li---r f^^- .^,l lacie. Aaal inrni ;t. AddiLjonal Fees and costs: Aoolicane agrees lo dernay any expenses incurred by the oistricc in
:onnec:.:on xiEh the allocrpnc of '.iacer rignts here,$oer. including. but noE limlted to. reifibursenent of ]egal an<l engineecing
:3S;s tncurreo in conneclion ,riEh any.,iater rignEs an6 adSuoicaC:On necessary co allow AoplicanE's use of SuCn allocEed waEef
,'l gn ts .
g. AssiorurenE: This ccncracE/lease snall inure [o uhe benerit of tlle heirs. suc=sssors or assigns of
:he rarE.les her€Eo. Any assignrEnt of Ehe Aool'icant's rights under this concract/lease shall be sr'roiecr Eo' and musE comoiy
rrEIl. sr,lG1 requirerBncs as the.gistr.rcE, firay hereafter adooc regarding assigmenc of contract/lease nlgnts and Lhe assuloc'ion
.:r:cncraciirease ooriga.ions by assrgnees ano succ3ssors. Noching herern shall preven. successors io a por"lon Jr
.:ooircanc.: prcD€rEy from aoplying to the o'istrlcE, for indivrdual and sepanate allouent contracEs/leases' No assigrurenr
:;:aii :e rcccgnieed ly [he piscrrcg except uoon cosplec]on and iiling or prcper foms for change of ot"nersnio'
uoon the sale of Ehe real prooerty to vflich Lnrs conEractr/lease pertains. AoplicanE has a ouEy Lo maKe Duye!'
irldra ur:hlS cCnE!'aCUleaSe and pmoer fOnnS iOr Cnange Of i'rnerShiO mUSt ie cOnolemd'
.). 0ther Rules: Aoplicant snall be bouno by Ehe prrvisions of Ehe I'laEer conser/ane/ Acf, of coloraoo:
:y :ie ruies ano regulatlons Dr Ene 3oard of oircctors or the District: and all aflEn@nf,s uhereof and suopie'IEnEs EnereEo
.rno :y I i I Dfier aoplicaole law'
lo. Coeratjon and t{ainrenancp Aorcemnr: Applican[ shall encerinto an '0oeracion and Malntenanc3
Agree[EnE. ,rrth Ehe 0i$rict under terflE ano conditlons deEerflnned by the boaro of oirectors of ihe oistrtcc' if an6'^nen'
::.re 30aro or sa.lct Distrrct deEerflrnes in its soie oiscrerion EhaE suc.l an agr€efiElE is required. said agreeflEnE' may ccnE'a]n'
)uc:nail noc be iimi[ed to. prcvislons ior aodit]onal annual imnetary consloeraE'ion iOr extens'ion or DistrtcE celiverr
jer,,,rc3s ;no ior aodlE.lonal aomrnisrraEton. oDeraEion. and matnlenance costs: or for other costs io ihe DisE'rrc'u 'nnicn Inav
ir:se inrcu-qn servlcgs maoe avallaole Lo the Applicanc'
,:L ;hanqe of ltse: Ihe oistrrc reser/es Bhe axclustve rignc io r"evierJ' ieaoorove or oisaoDrove jnY
rcccosec,::.lange in use,or ;he,raEe!. ailoEiec hereuncer. Any use orher -:rran rhaE, ser- iorEh herern i)r any lease or saie:i-
tr9 .ritc3r. 0r. .rdE€f .rlqnE,s ,rllotted here,$oer ,,rithouc ihe ,r:or ',,irttten aporovai or ;he Discl'lc: .'nall tre ceemeo io le i
rac3r':ar :reacn or :hls concracrl lease'
.-2. ilsa ano ptace oi !lsa: Aopiic:nc agregs io rse ihe'iacen rn ;:1e manner an0:n ;ne,cCOerty'jesc::cec
i ::.ie:oc,_r.r.ncs :u'mrLt3o [o cl.le Dl strrcE aC Che ::rTE lnis cSncrac:,r'l ease ]s a,\ecu[eo. or ln anY toet'acion anO inalnEenanc?
jcr=.r=nc ,mvloeo cy AooiiCanc. Any use qgngl than as seE aorth ihereon or any lease or sale of ;ne "{ater 0l. "r?t3r' lrllnE:
:er9,n. )rner llan :s pernicted ln raragraon 3 aoove. snail le oee{IEo ;o De a maf,eclai breacn of :l':ls agregl]enc'
13.
inv :qul caoie ,:.r lerJa I
-itle: [E is unoersiood ano agreeo ihaE noEhrng herein snall be ln[erprete0 [c glve lheiooi!c]nc
:egLlclelnf,eresi,inor:onny'raEe!'ll'rdE'et.cigncsceTerreor-onerein'
!4 ionservacion: Aopiicanc snail use ennnniy acceoEeo conser/aq'lon oracElces xlt'h fesoec: lc ile',ilt3t
tno ^acer {-rgnEs,1e!"?1n. anct hercoy agrees io be bound by any conser/ation Dlan amoEeo hereafter ly lhe oiscrtct ior l,ise
,li Jis;l:cE D'ded or ccncrolled'a'lCef o|dater rlgncs
tS. Restrierions: ApplicanE shall rescrrcr actual divers:ons 'ro noE ?xcee( lhe ConEracli Lease a[x]unc.
.^{,,.,l ,mvro€S.,rilEet (On ihe formula of one aci"e foot, per ou€lling) For ordinary household purposes instde one stngle iam:lv
- ldrcen.
perflit obtained frcm
,JaLering oi livestock shall be restricted Eo Applicant's dorestic animals noL Eo be used for corrnereial
Jur6oses unless ,tpol icant obtains aporoval from Ehe Colorado Division of'Jater Resources for compreial use/l ivestock xacering
.)r.,i nurse Doarolng iacility. provided LhaE in no e,/enc shall accual diversions exceeo lhe a[PUn[ of',vater provloed'by chrs
,.oncracc,t Laase.
Violarlon or Ehis paragraoh 15 shall oe deemd Eo be a macerral breach of this ConEract/Lease.
i . ) AoPlicant shal] also c
He (;ol0rado 0ivtsion of Hater Resources.
i6'
.i i:coy uf roPlicrnc s
wilh all restrricLions and limilations t rth
'itell Pem]t: tf Applican[ intends Eo divert through a,^ell. then ApPlicant musc provide to 0istric:
valid,nell pennit berore Distric! is obligated Eo deliver any lvaler hereunder.
ileasurinq Device or l',teter: Applicanc ,rgrees co provide. at its okn e,\pense. 3 LoEalie'inE ilow rnerer
.,tcn ieflD[e .eaoouE io concinuously and accuiacely ,reasure ]t, al.l ilrnes. all waEer diverEed pursuanE Uo l,he terms of
iopllclnt, j,iarer r:gnE ano [he Eenns of l,his contrac+./iease. Applicant agrees to prcvide accurate ceaoings irom such devtce
)r.nece!-.:c Disil:c'. uoon Districi's request. Applicanc acknorleoges Ehat iallure co comoly xrth Ehis paragraon couid resuic
n ,egal iclon io cerrrnaEe Applicant's divers'ron of water by ihe SEaEe of Cotorado Divrsion of Hater Resources. By signing
:nts concrec!. Aooiicanc hereDy soecirically aliows Distrtct. uhrougn its authorlzeo agent,. to enter uponaoplicanE s proper!-Y
:urrng,)rdinar-v lusiness nours for che purposes of determtning aopiicanc's actual use of waEer.
r8. lleoresentations: By e,recuLing Ehis concract/lease. Applicanc agrees lhat lt is nor, r'elying on iny
iegai or engineenng:advtce.that Applicanc may beiieve has been necetved from Ehe 0istrict. Aoplicant further acrnowleoges
:ha[, rt, has rbcaineo all necessary'legal and engineening advice from AoplicanE's ovrn sources other Ehan the Distrtc:.
.iooiic3nc iurEner acknorleoges Ehat lhe District makes no guarantees. 'rarrantles. or assurances whacsoever a00uE ihe quanEli-Y
,lr tuali[y {)r da[,er avarlaole pursuanf, Lo Ehrs contract/lease. should the 0isEncE be unable Eo provioe [he'i{aEer contraclec
:.)r;le!-eln. no camages rnay be dssessed agalnst Ehe DisErtcE. nor may Aoplicanc ootain a cetund from che 0istrtc:.
-9. iosts of ilacer Courr Filino and,\rrcrBnracion 9lan' Should Ehe OisErrcE,, in its oran 1isc:'elton.
:noose ;o inciuoe;oplicanc s concract/lease herein 'in a xacer court filing ior alternaLe potnc oi,liverston or olan oi
:uqmenceIion.. ;nen;opl]canc nereDy agrees io pay Eo lhe 0istrlcc. wnen assesseo. an,idditional iee i'eoresentlng:l1e
jis;ilcg s ac:uarlano neasonable costs ano iees ior Aoplicant,'s snare of lhe proceeolngs. ApoltcanE snail oe lssesseo d irc-
,.;t[a snare,)r rne:otal cosi incurreo by lhe Distrrct, in preoaring. filing ancl pursutng [o oeci"ee ;he.iaEer courr case. ]i::
ji1.r.3Ei jnar? :iiail :e caiculaceo by divrding sucn toEal cosc ly l,he nunoer oi concracleesi lessees :ncluoeo ln che l'ilino
-.) ::te t,\cenc:naE ihe DisirlcE is causecl aooitional cosrs oec3use cr oo.lecllon iileo soec:fically:ue'.o che incluslon,ii
.uoii(::nc j lcn[iac:.']ease in ;he liling. sucn aodrtional cosis may be cnargeo:oectficall.v;o Aoplicanc ano noc snare4:;n
r t,r'o-r';ittt Jasi: lY ,: I I ;onc,raclees/ lessees.
10.3indino loreemenr: Thrs agreamnE:nail not, ce:cmolete nor linoing uoon che Distrrcc unias:
'j[,iacneo ier.ecc s :ne lorm enrrtled 'Aopiicatton and DaEa Fonn io Le3se rlacer i:r'om iesc Divioe Warer Conservancy Dtst,r:c:'
'r-lrlv r:cmoteseo ly ioplicanc ancl aoproved by'Lhe Discr:c'"'s englneer Sard aEtscnrnen[s snall Dy ihts,'eferenca lheretc:-"
iltcorooratea inco :he [erms oi r-hrs agreefienE. All corresDonoence from [he 0isrrici;o Aoplicanc rererr':ng io or neiaE:nc
:r;.lls igree$enc :s lly ;his rererence incorporaceo inco chis agreemenE as iurther lerms and conott:ons or;his agreealen[
?!. ',Jarninq: tT IS THE S0Lt RESP0NSIBILII'/ 0F iHE APPLICANI I0 OBTAIN A VALIO ',lELL 2ERHIT 0R OTHER iiATEj.
ItGHr :rl |R0ER ,O IIVERI /AIER. INCLU0ING THE'/AIER ACQUIRED UNOER IHIS CONTRACT/LEqSE. IT tS TXE iONlillulNc CuTY 0F hE
iPPl-iC,iNf i0 i'tAINIAtN rHE'/ALIDITY 0F THE',{ELL PERHIT 0R'IAIER RIG{I INCLUOING FILIHG FOR TXTENSIONS 0F PEP}Itis. FILING TEt-,.
(;OHPLEIION :IEPORIS. FILING STATEHENIS OF BENEFICIAL USE. OR OTHERI{ISE IJI{FULLY APPLYING iHE XAIER iO BAIEFICIAL USE {)N i
TIEGULAR ilAStS :tiHoul ',nNTE.
IJONINACT/I.EASE tS LOCAIED OUTSIOE 'AREA A' AS OESIGMTED BY THE OISTRICT. THEN THTS PARAGIAPH APPLIES:AI,GHE.ITAIION I{ATER
pR0vt0E0 BY IHE 0ISTRICT W0ER IIIIS r qCT HAY ONLY PROTEfi APPLICAT{T'S r,lAIER P" 'FR0H A O\LL 0N IHE C0L0RA00 RIVER ANr)
r{Ay NOt PROIECT APPLICANI mOH A CALI- .,r0H ANY OTHER SBIIOR R[GI{I. N0 REPRESB{. -dtl OIHERIIISE tS r{A0E BY TI{E OISdtCi:
iF THIS IS A CONCERN TO APPLTCANT, THIS CONIRACT/LEASE I{AY BE RESCINI)ED UPON I{RITTEN NOTICE OELIVERED IO.IHE DTSTRICI BY THE
IPPLICANI I'IITHIN THE NFII i0 oAYS F0LLoIIING IHE AFFIXING 0F SIG\ATURES 0N THIS CoNTRACI/LE\SE IN
"lHICl'l
Elig\I ALL SWS PAIo
3Y APPLIO1NI FOR IHTS CONTRACT/LEASE SMLL AE IM{EDIAIELY REFIINOED M APPLICANT.
:TATE OF COLORADO
':OUNIY OF GARFIELO
)
) ss.
)
('fr,iLL,,A4 fffih",'*}^)
, ,;f1/
insEiurpnc ,,ias acknowleoged beiore rne on this 14 oay of) , ihe ;oregotng
l/frE,f /'l *ruGl11i^J
KATHLEEN L. BILODEAU
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
My Commission Expires June 12,2004
After a hearlng oy the Boaro of 0irectors
nereey 0RDERED lnaE said aoplication be granted and
ORDER
of the ',,test 0ivrde 'JaLer Conservancy
chis concract/lease shall be ano is
Joo I
/jlrl Rc-#t{ bv
Disrr:cc on che aoplicacrcn.
acceeEed by :he 0iscrrct.
Hitness my hand and oifictai seal.
$y comr ssion exoi res:b-/3-of
.l I i' j i
</=r /u r
0a ce
ihrs conc;.act/lease inciudes and is suojeci:c lne lerms and conoitions cr;he follo',rrng coc'.::ren[s ."nicn nusL
.rccsrnDany ;hl s ionEract/l ease:
It.
1
i4ao showing location of point ot oiversion (use inao provideo)
Aopiicaf,ton and Oaca Form iully caroleceo and signeo
Notar:/ PU#i.
l
,'ri -t--/ -/ ,/
-.L, J rz{a^/Sc?<t-,
,,IEST D IV I DL.IAffiffiTERVANC1,1 I STR t CT
,,
2res I oent
(-l.,.
1
.t1i::i1i.ii ii.iii:i:.l:l,l:iiii, g-"-111i f tli
f ol Residettces
sons/r esidettce
gallor ts/Pe(solVdaY
cettl Colrstrtrted
lrrigation
I ElliciericY
{9q|l,l! (9lE!
oo.,restt"CotntltercialDorlt\Cotlrnr.operrSpaceLlvestock
Irr-ltortso ttt ltortsr': lrt lgalirrrr ll t igallsll
(ac-(t) (ac'lt| (1! {U (": I!)
Talrle 1 Monrttnent Ridge l{omeowl-lers
Estinralecl Water Reqttiretnerrts
Water Use Calculations
Association
ril
ur rils
cap/rrrtil
glrctl
so lUurli
:::,,::
:::,:::;,;
ur ri
cill
91,
s(l
!!
s(l
!!
'Wi
I I iii,i'i iloi'riif ,: g gfrifi
llll ol cciinrnercial t
ll r perso,rsl,,nit
ll# oallorrs4rersorVt
llPerceot Consutrte
llt aurr, lrrigatiorl
ll nppticatiorr Ell-rcie
llglgp ,llig IeetIlI
ater
ifr.o-ilir
U,,ii;'
- ..-inuii"'ii.+ t':'''ilt+i
'lt:i l::il::ili'
O.0O acres
2.91 ll
2 00 urtils
15 00 gaUons
0.00 ac(es
to%
? ?t- tl- .
Us6 lnr
. -.-...+-...=..-.t.:tgii$rti|E
00
35
100
15%
250-0
70%
..-- ..?2t.pl8)
H.qitrLl{rl:,:i':
200
35
100
l5%
2500
lo%
. ?,?t
ll pelsotls/
4 gallorts/1:
Petcetlt Cr
Lawrt lrtigr
Applicaliot
9lge lttig t
Mottllt
JattttarY
February
Marclt
Aprll
May
Jutte
July
Augusl
Seplenlbe,
Oclober
Novetnber
Decctttber
0 666
0 601
0 666
0 6{,1
0 666
0 6{{
0 666
0 666
0 6.1{
0 66ii
0 644
0 6titi
(1:'tll
o 057
0 052
0 057
0 os5
0 057
0 055
0.057
0 057
0 055
o 057
0 055
o 057
Tolal
{1:'lll
o.t2
0.65
o.72
1.01
1.23
1.4s
1.53
1.41
1.18
0.90
0.70
o.72
(7)
Average
Flow
- (gPn,t
53
53
5.3
76
90
110
111
10.3
E9
66
53
5.3
(0)
Domestac
I r-l totr s e
Be lll
0.100
0.090
0 100
0 097
0 100
0 097
0.100
0.100
0 097
0 100
0 097
0.100
006
0.05
0.06
006
006
o06
o06
0.06
. 006
006
0.06
006
0.16
0.14
0.16
0.37
0.s1
0.68
o.t2
0.64
0.48
0.28
0.15
0.16
4.45
000
000
000
o00
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
: i.:
000
000
000
0 3l
0ll
o75
0BO
069
0 .18
018
000
000
1.72
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
0.00
o00
u00
000
000
(e)
Comnterclal
lrt-ltouse
!3e.lll
000
000
000
0.00
000
000
000
ooo
000
000
000
000
( l0)
Dom\Comnr
trrigallolt
!1s'lll
000
000
000
o22
036
053
o56
o.48
0.33
013
000
o00
(1 1)
Open Space
lrrlgallon
F: {l)
0.00
000
0.00
000
000
0.00
000
o.00
000
000,
000
000
(1 2)
l.lvestock
(13) (14)
Average
Total Flow
lac-Itl (spm)
1.1
1.1
l1
28
3.1
51
53
4.1
37
2.1
1.1
1.1
2.152.61
Arurrtal
eoruse west tliv.123r n o n CC/1/-lAl-[:q lr'rn
'', i'r,'lir,i,,;Ojtipi,
Pond Surlace Area
Anrtual ll!l EvaPoralioo
@ lSgal/daY
gallons/daylunil
hrigated OPen SPace
Applicalior I ElliciencY
Croo lrtict reqrnnl (ClR)
gpcd
sq-lUurtit
7.840
05/ 1 0/01
TABLE 3 - r. .tument Ridge Homeowners, ociation
Total Consumptive Use
(l) Total consumptive use ior subdivision.
(2) 10% transit loss.
(3) Subdivision CU + rransit losses.= (1) + (2)
0.14 10%
trarcn :l o.ro ' 10% l[ 0.17
Aonl il 0.37 1oo/o
il 0.51 | 1Oo/o il 0.!q
June :l 0.68 lQYo
July 'i A.72 10o/o i
st ,l O.O+ 10o/o ii O.ZO
s"ot".o"r ;i o.+g 1oo/o .l 0.53
ocrooer .l 0.28 1Oo/o il o.st
No*mo"r ,i o.ts !Q% ----l o.tz
December | 0.16 10o/o il 0.17
'liiAnnual ' , +.+5 rl a.go
ZANCANEI-LA & ASSCCIAIES, lnc.eqruSe'rvest div.123
Month
(1)
CU
(ac-ft)
(z)
Transit Loss
(1'o\
(3)
TotatCU
- Gqt)
January 0.16 1 096 0.17
Feoruary 0.16
0.41
May
0.75
0.79