Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office :970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. I I oef5 ~--------------------------- Parcel No : 2407-191-26-012 Locality: Monument Ridg"-e_S_u_bd_. _Lo_t _12 ______________ _ Job Address: 100 Dry Creek Rd. Parachute Use of Building : detached garage Owner : Wissler, Ed Contractor: Owner Fees: Plan Check: $ 267.44 Septic: Bldg Permit : $ 411 .45 Other Fees: Total Fees: $ 678.89 Clerk: ~ Date: {f~7f-C8 I / GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPL I CA T I ON 108 8 '" Street. Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 9 70-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 1 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 ··. Parce l /Sch ed u l e No J Cfo 7 -/CZ J -J' '"'6 I ~ Penn it No:~----------------- 2 3 4 5 f i 7 Describe Work: 8 Class of Work: ~' ~: 10 0 11 Valuation of Work: ·• CJ Addres5: 0 Singl e D ouble 0 TI-llS PERM IT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRU CTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS. OR. IF COI'/STRUCTI ON OR W ORK I S SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TI ME AFTEH W ORK I S COMMENCED. I HEREBY CEHTIFY THAT I HAVE -READ AND EXAMINED T HIS APJ5L!CATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO B E mUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WI LL BE COMPLETED WITH IN WHETHER SPEC IFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERM IT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TiiE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOC AL LAW REGULATI NG CONSTRUCTI ON OR THE PERFORMANCE OFCON TIO . ..::..._ Ph: 0 AJteration A ddition :J Move On-Site Sewage D i sposal Tota l Zo ning: Manu. Home: Carpor t: :r--Site Plan fs,· J. 3· AGREEMENT Lie . No . Li e. No. No . of F l oors: o Remove 0 !J Sin gle Doubl e Can s t. Type: Setback s: JSDS No . & Fe e: PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO T HE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND/OR T H E AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFI CATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDI NG DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE I SSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. T HE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO CO MPLY WITH ALL BUILDI NG CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY G ARFIELD COUN1Y PU RSUANT TO AUTHORITI' G IVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. TiiE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WlTH IN THE LCOATION. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION. AND USE OF T HE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMI T MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM T H E COUNTY AND T HAT THEN AND 'n-IERE IT SHALL BECOME \'lULL AND VOID. T H E ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFI C ATI ONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT TiiE BUIL D I NG OFFICIAL FROM T H EREAFTER REQU IRING T H E CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPEC IFICAT IONS AND OTH ER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUI LDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN V I OLATION OF T HS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF Tiii S J URISDICTI ON. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATI ONS AND I NSPECTION S CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIB ILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. O MI SSIONS OR DISCREPEN C I ES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND I M PLEMENTATION DURI NG CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WI TH TH E AHTICTECT, DESI GNER. BUILDER. AND OWNER CO MMENTS ARE INTEND ED TO BE CONSERVATNE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST.~d cJ:k-s~gRE;AC17~7 /oT~HAV01 D~~;~~7 DTHEAGREEMENT ABDVEU N•T~~ The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UPTO SBUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# _____ _ Signature Bpapplicationoctober2006 Date PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant_' _lJ--=-/-=5:..o.!;)_L. ........ lU2...=--=,.__- Building J.{!Engineered Foundation -1.1 A. Driveway Permit Aurveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks ~/Topography 30% ~idential Plan Review List __ Minimum Application Questionnaire ~vision Plat Notes 11A . Fire Dep ment Review ~etermination/Fees __ Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~ditions __ Application Signed --~wer To Sign Application ~Schedule No. tJ...A 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms . ~Report GENERAL NOTES: Date----=~==-·_2-_,h!:.,_-_C>g___._._ __ _ Planning/Zoning ............--~erty Line Setbacks M..&_30ft Stream Setbacks .!1l__Flood Plain ~dil)g Height ~ __ Zoning Sign-off ;1./_ ~Road Impact Fees ii ~Approval __ Grade/Topography 40% dLP~ng Issues ~ubdivision Plat Notes VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date Wi ssler Subdivision ~~~----------------------...;;1....;.0..;_0 .;;.D..;.,ry'-C..;_r;.;.e..;.;ek..;_R;;.;;.;;..d.~--------------Lot/Biock 10/4/2007 Contractor ...;;....;.~;.;.....;.~-------------------- Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfin ished Squa re Feet Valuation Convers ion of Unfini shed to Fini shed Total Valuat ion Garage: Valuat ion Craw l Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Va lu ation Total Valuation sf sf sf sf 0 sf sf s f 1s(l1)sr X r<t . co Commercial s f sf sf sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Monument Ridge Sub tP • 12 Owner 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your · project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in yonr design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with I decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawingry Properties with slopes of30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 1 06.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes __. 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes /Zd- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjac~!JroRerties), streams or water courses? Yes ad_ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? 2 Yes __ _::_ __ _ 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes v--- 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes~ 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ,;1# 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces anJI soffits? Yes ,dd 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and win loads? Yes;_..u_~==-- I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? -·-· Yes ~ II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ;.------- 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection ~:II co,n;;nd beams? • 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes ~ · 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including 3 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No ,_...--- Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? . ~ Yes No _______ ~ ______ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from s!jp~in rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes £4___ No . ------------ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light andyp/jation for all habitable rooms? Yes ~ No ____________ __ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and sp~ ?fety glazing for these areas? Yes ~ No ____________ _ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicat~! plan? Yes ~ No _____ __ Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption · process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/orcov~ Yes No _______ _ Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without i~ but you run the risk o{ the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes ~ No __________ __ Will th~ thyonly residential structure on the parcel? Yes .~ No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ Have two (2) c:gmplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes ,....---- 4 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? -------- Yes ~ No ________ __ 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building a.nd other construction co~equirements? Yes ~ No _____ _ 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes r--No ______ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by Jhe Garfield County Building Department? Yes ~ No. _________ _ 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applic<!!iJ:m of these changes 0 Yes ~ No. _________ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building perg1it? Yes r' No. _________ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to . .384-5003. Yes ~ No, _________ --'- 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $5Q..O\}Te-inspection fee? Yes j../""' No. _________ _ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes ____..--No, _____ _ 5 33 . Are you aware that the P em1 it Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party respon sibl e for the proj ect mu st comply with the IRC? Yes y--No ------- 34 . Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to p erform in stalla t ion s and hookups, unless you as th e homeowner are performing the work? The li cens e number of the person performing the wo rk will be requi.red at time o!)l.pp li cable in specti on . Yes ~ No --------- 35. Are you aware, that on the front of th e Building Permi t Application you will need to fill in the Parcel /Schedule Number for th e lot you are app ly ing for this permit on prior to submittal of a building p ermit applicatio n? Your attention in thi s is appreciated. Yes ~ No ---------- 36. Do you know that th e local fire di tri may require you to submit plan s for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with th e building department about t is r equirement) 37. D o you und e rstand that if you arc pl anning on doin g an y excavatin g or grad in g to th e property prior t o is suance of a building p ermit that you will be required to obtain a grading ~eerr;it}1d= 38. Are you aware that if you will be conn ectin g to a pub li c water an d/or sewer system , that the tap fees have t o be paid and th e conn ections in s pected by the servi ce provider prior to the ~~~a~~rtificate of Occupancy? I hereby acknowledge that I have r ea d, understand and answered th ese qu estions to the "~)?t?~ --~ ~/Z-&?7 Signature of Owner Date Notes: If yo u have answered "No " on any of the questions, you may b e r equired to provide this 6 information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes. the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq November2006 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. 7 5PSF 8001 to 9000ft. 1 OOPSF 9001 to 1 OOOOft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 800 I and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-Jayment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. • Basement wall R-values are R-IO bel'ow grade, R -19 above grade. • Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R- 10/36in. • Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below grade and R -19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING and PLANNING Owner's agreement for a permit to build a garage prior to building a residence I, £d ~f.Jer , state that the garage built as authorized by the permit for which I am applying will be used exclusively for storage of automobiles or personnel possessions and not for any residential dwelling or commercial purpose. I also state that a building permit for my home will be applied for and issued within one (1) year of this agreement. Name Date RECEIVED APR 1 6 Z009 GARFI ELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNIN G Garfield County Ed \rJissl e r P .O. Box 4 2 Parachute, Co . 8 1 6 3 .5 Building and Planning Department 1 08 8 th 3treet, S uite #401 Glenwood Spring s , Co . 8 1601 To Whom This May Concern: When we applied for a building permit for a g arage I sig ned an a g reement to build a ~ouse within 1 year. Due to my illn ess , g arag e construction was delayed quite awhi l e . Now when we mi g ht start building the house , the economy and our finances hav e delayed building our house indefinitely . We hope you will u n derstand and work with us . The building permit number is 1100.5 . Thank you, COUNTY OF GARFIELD-BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at /[)6 ~ f!.ueL!et Permit No. 1/oD.s;- ------~-------------------------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~ ~~ ~ ~:zy;:b) ~?Cle....--~ 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /.1--IS"-tY;ij{ 20 ----ri--- Building Inspector iJ4u. ,""~ Phone (970) 945-8212 No 11005 . ----------~~~-----Assessor's Parcel No. 2407-191-26-012 Date 6/2712008 BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address _____ 1uO!J.OuD~ryl.!...!C\!.r!.Se;!;;ee!J,kJR:!Jd!..._M!!l!.!o'!.!n.Yu!!mBernn!.!..t ~RI.l!idl.l1gll.!eiL>2SJJI!ubyd ..J, IL.Jowt:.._1u2..,_, ..cP:....~' c.;.rh.uuutt:.e ----------------------- Owner ________ ___;W.......,is,s'-"le'<-'r-'--'=E""d ______________ Address PO Box 42 P'chute Phone # 970-285-9124 Contractor Owner Address same Phone # ________ _ Setbacks: Front _____ Rear _________ RH1 _________ LH ______ Zoning ____ _ detached garage Soi Is Test -----;r-;~--=--.....-,-t-------.------.nc-- Footing. 3-J:oZ> ~ Rf.IV-- Foundatlon 3. 7-~ Grout ___________________ __ Underground Plumbing __________ _ Rough PI u mbing .-=----,,-,.,-......,,.....,.--- Framing 11--\5'-o3 IWn Insulation --------------- Roofing--------------------- Drywall------------------------ INSPECTIONS Weatherproofing ________________ _ Mechanical _____________________ _ Electrical Rough (State) ~ Electri~al f;.iflal .LState) /1.-D ~ ' Finalj'~Y,P7 /Checklist Completed? Certificate Occupancy # _________ _ Date _________________ _ Septic System # --------------------- Date ____________________ _ Final ____________________ _ Other _________________________ _ (continue on back) BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB Datelssued_(()j~Ik---PermitNo._/._._/~(){)5=---------- AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. UseJJe:l1rlled----CNJ ......... l1M§el<f""------- Address or Legal Description I 00 'Dn1 Creet. Q.d Para.c.huie, Owner 't/'SSler, E"d Contractor~-------- Building PermitType J2e.e& i dertfiaJ This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway 'b-5-bS J{hvG ~DK Foundation I Grouting ' Insulation '6·7-0 0 ~ Underground Plumbing Drywall Rough Plumbing Electric Final (by State Inspector) ~ (Prior to Final) Rough Mechanical Septic Final ~ Gas Piping FINAL !J _ ;;-if-c1'( /J-11 L--- Electric Rough (by State Inspector) (You Must Call Fot Final Inspection) ~ Notes~ 0, J--Su-,;-e<-(Prior to Framing) Framing j}rr..._ I :L -/,5;:-tJ51 (to include Roof in place & Windows & Doors installed & Firestopping in place) THIS PERMIT IS NOTTRANSFERABLE For Inspection Caii970-384-S003 Office 970-945-8212 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD ~::.ROVEtQ ('dl IOO By,:: L?.rman~ PROTECT PERMrrWOM wEATHERAMAGE (DO NOT LAMINATE) Parcel Detail Page I of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A~sessoriTreA~urex Prop<;rtyScnrc:b I Assessm:_S!lh.st:LQ!lfn' I Assessor Sales _Se;m:h C:lerk ... &Rec:on:lerRec_eptionSe nrch Basic Building Chara_cteristic~ I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 021 II R042712 II 240719126012 II 36.746 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jWISSLER, W EDWARD & WANDA J CO-TRUSTEES jOF THE WISSLER 1992 TRUST IPOBOX42 jPARACHUTE, CO 81635 Legal Description JsECT,TWN,RNG:l9-7-95 SUB:MONUMENT !RIDGE SUB-DIV LOT: 12 PRE:R008688 IAND/THRU:A TO:R008689 BK:0552 JPG:0092 BK:0464 PG:0585 BK:0336 IPG:0272 BK: 1939 PG:0426 I JRECPT:725887 BK: 1781 PG:6 JRECPT:694232 BK: 1753 PG:674 IRECPT:688073 BK:l753 PG:672 JRECPT:688072 BK:1714 PG:360 jRECPT:679636 BK: 1712 PG:903 jRECPT:679338 BK: 1712 PG:873 JRECPT:679337 BK: 1712 PG:872 jRECPT:679336 BK:l712 PG:849 jRECPT:679335 BK: 1426 PG: 132 jRECPT:618487 BK:l426 PG:l28 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber=R042712 9117/2007 Parcel Detail IRECPT:618486 BK:1415 PG:533 I IRECPT:616317 BK:1369 PG:103 I IRECPT:606907 BK:1363 PG:284 IRECPT:605346 BK:1213 PG: 17 IRECPT:570989 BK:1213 PG: 16 IRECPT:570988 BK:1213 PG: 15 IRECPT:270987 BK:0842 PG:0703 IBK:0834 PG:0445 BK:0834 PG:0434 IBK:0744 PG:0510 BK:0672 PG:0007 Location I Physical Address: 11100 DRY CREEK RD PARACHUTE/ I I I I I I I I Subdivision: IIMONUMENT RIDGE SUB-DIY I Land Acres: 118.38 I Land Sq Ft: llo Section II Township II Range I 19 II 7 1/ 95 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I Land: 17011 sol Improvements: oil ol Total: noll sol Sale Date: 11~6/~1=5/=20=0~7========ll Sale Price: 11170,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/Parcel. asp? AccountN umber= R04 2 712 Page 2 of 3 9117/2007 Parcel Detail Tax Year Transaction Type Amount I 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($5.00)1 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($1.84)1 2006 Tax Amount $5.ool I 2006 Tax Amount II $1.841 I 2005 Tax Payment: Whole II ($10.68)1 I 2005 Tax Amount II $10.681 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options !;:J~Li<:_Q::_.Recorder Database Sean:JL OQ!ion~ Garfield County Home Page Page 3 of 3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www. garcoact. com/assessor/Parcel. asp? AccountN umber=R04 2712 9/17/2007 7) ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING BE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT NECESSARY AND SHALL BE DIRECTED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, TOWARDS THE INTERIOR OF THE SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THAT PROVISIONS MAY BE MADE TO ALLOW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING THAT GOES BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. 8) COLORADO IS A ~RIGHT-TD-FARM• STATE PURSUANT TO C.R.S. ~5-3-101, ET SEQ. LANDOWNERS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS MUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT Th'E ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUNDS AND SMELLS OF GARFIELD COUNTY'S AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AS A NORMAL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF LIVING IN A COUNTY WITH A STRONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEALTHY RANCHING SECTOR. THOSE WITH AN URBAN SENSITIVITY MAY PERCEIVE SUCH ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUNDS, AND SMELLS ONLY AS INCONVENIENCE, EYESORE, NOISE AND ODOR. HOWEVER, STATE LAW AND COUNTY POLICY PROVIDE THAT RANCHING, fARMING OR OTHER AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS WITHIN GARFIELD COUNTY SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE NUISANCES SO LONG AS OPERATED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LAW AND IN A NON-NEGLIGENT MANNER. THEREFORE. ALL MUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, MUD, OUST, SMOKE, CHEMICALS, MACHINERY ON PUBLIC ROADS, LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MANURE. AND THE APPLICATION BY SPRAYING OR OTHERWISE OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS, SOIL AMENDMENTS, HERBICIDES. AND PESTICIDES, ANY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NATURALLY OCCUR AS PART OF A LEGAL AND NON- NEGLIGENT AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. 9) IN ADDITION, ALL OWNERS OF LAND, WHETHER RANCH OR RESIDENCE, HAVE OBLIGATIONS UNDER STATE LAW AND COUNTY REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO THE MAINTENANCE OF FENCES AND IRRIGATION DITCHES, CONTROLLING WEEDS, KEEPING LIVESTOCK AND PETS UNDER CONTROL, USING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZONING, AND OTHER ASPECTS OF USING AND MAINTAINING PROPERTY. RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO LEARN ABOUT THESE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACT AS GOOD NEIGHBORS AND CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY. A GOOD INTRODUCTORY SOURCE FOR SUCH INFORMATION IS -A GUIDE TO RURAL LIVING & SMALL SCALE AGRICULTURE-PUT OUT BY THE COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION OFFICE IN GARFIELD COUNTY. ~PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, EACH LOT WILL BE SrAKEO AND ~CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR VERIFYING BUILDING LOC.~TION WITHIN APPROVED ENVELOPE. 11) CRADING FOR CONVEYANCE OF STORM WATER AWAY FROM STRUCTURES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EACH LOT OWNER. ALL OWNERS SHALL ALLOW FOR C~NVEYANCE OF STORM WATER THROUGH THEIR LOT, 12) ALL IRRIGATION DITCHES AND DITCH EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECOGNIZED AND MAINTAINED AS EXISTING AND IN PLACE, IN THE USUAL MANNER, AND INCLUDE A 10-FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT CENTERED ON EACH EXISTING DITCH. 13} ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION DITCHES SHALL INCLUDE A 1D-FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT CENTERED ON EACH EXISTING DITCH. 14) ANY NEW BUILDINGS SHALL AVOID AREAS OF NATURAL DRAINAGE, NATUHAL DRAINAGES SHALL BE PRESERVED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 15) ALL PROPERTY LINES WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHALL HAVE A 15-FOOT UTILITY, WELL. AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT CENTERED ON THE PROPERTY LINE. 16) ALL LOTS SHALL INCLUDE STANDARD LOT SETBACKS DEFINED BY GARFI-~LO COUNTY FOR A/R/RD LAND USE. 17) DEBRIS FLOW, UNSTABLE AND POTENTIALLY UNSTABLE SOILS AND 10D-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AREAS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NON-BUILDABLE AREAS INCLUDING 20' BEYOND THE SHOWN AREAS, EXCEPT FOR THE LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS, UTILITY LINES AND IRRIGATION LINES AS SET FORTH HEREIN. THE DEBRIS FLOW ZONES WfRE DELINEATED WITHIN CTL THOMPSON'S GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NUMBER GS-3515. ~DUE TO THE EXPANSIVE AND COMPRESSIBLE SOtLS, THE OWNER/DEVELOPER OF EACH ~LOT SHALL CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DESIGN LEVEL GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES ONCE BUILDING LOCATIONS ARE FINALIZED, TO CHARACTERIZE SOIL AND ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BENEATH EACH PLANNED STRUCTURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND WHETHER FOOTINGS WITH A MINIMUM LOAD WILL BE NEEDED TO COUNTERACT EXPANSIVE CLAYS. LOT OWNER SHOULD REFERENCE THE REPORT PREPARED BY CTL/THOMPSON, INC ENTITLED, ~GEOLOGIC EVALUATION AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MONUMENT HILLS RANCH SUBDIVISION BATTLEMENT MESA GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO~, A COPY OF WHICH SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICES OF THE MONUMENT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. OBSERVATION YIELDING A BEARING 1.* ::. uv .. , oo c. "''-"''-'-'• ,.._ .. -.. SECTION 20, A 3" BRASS CAP L.S.#11643 IN PLACE AND THE WEST OUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2D, A 2-3/4" P~1o.IN BRASS CAP IN PLACE. 2) DATE OF SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 13 -30. 2000. 3) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON RECEPnON NO. 439413 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, MONUMENTS FOUND IN PLACE, THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY COMMONWEALTH TITLE COMPANY (FILE NO. 0008062) AND DOCUMENT~ OF RECORD. 4) THE FLOOD ZONE SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON f[MA COMMUNITY PANEL NO. OeQ205 341A, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 15, 1977. 5) THE ORIGIN Of TOPOGRAPHY IS INTERPOLATED FROM 40-FOOT CONTOURS OFF OF THE U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY MAP, PARACHUTE QUADRANQ.E, BASED FROM THE NAnONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929. DATE COUNTY SVRyEYQR'S CERT!f!CATf AND FORM ONLY AND NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS, CALCULATIONS OR C.R.S. 1973, 38-51-101 AND 102 (REVISED). ATTOBNFY'S CFRI!fiCATf ~T~Aot-DRf~~T I fY rH:: T~T~~0~0~6~~~~~EI~~EDI ST~ :~~~~~~~g~~ ~OMP~HI~t WITH THE GARFIELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF 1984, AS AMENDED, AND THAT ALL PI DEDICATIONS SET FORTH HEREIN ARE FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECC EXCEPT: .e.G')e&m c3z;:r: 5'?-'<'.!F-f, t':s-o:s:-9, :s-s-Bo .P-:?5&, ;;u:s-6f?5, :::l't51'8q -?'o:s-S".II}?'?' -?"'e>s-s-::"8 :f'ft5?o.z"f' l'r£on, TS!.:rz;;r fi!"Ai?'?'1 3'S'O$'t:J.Y. •FIPA~~ al/ :Oh~ G<t@~/..-< HuN?~ e./"'<~ .f"&<mc<« t¥!ri~ RNEY "'f/'A/&s-DATE ~~~~~~~~~l \, i --. ,------~~ ' ~ ~~ "' ;~ ~ ~ D I -I L __L______ .. __ _ ' --~ ::r-~ I I I <['<tiC' ------t---------:; & 9 $ ~~iii- I I L~~----~- D 1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED wrrHOUI'THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE COMMITMENT AND DOES NaT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OR BOOKCUFF SURVEY SERVICES, INC. OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP, COMPATIBILlTY WITH ADJOINING PARCELS, OR EASEMENT OR ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORDS AFFECTING THIS PARCEL. 2.) THE PROPOSED BUILDING SITE AND !...EACH FIELD ARE NOT LOCATED WITHJN A 30% SLOPE AREA. 3.) THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY, IMPROVEMENT OR IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTTFICATE SURVEY BY BOOK CLIFF SURVEY SERVICES, INC. OR ANY OF ITS ASSOCIATES. 4.) THE ELEVATION OF THE SITE IS BASED ON A WGS84 ELEVATION OF 5389.4' ON THE NORTIIERLY ANGLE POINT OF LOT 12, A REBAR AND CAP ILLEGIBLE, IN PLACE AND SHOWN HEREON. SITE PLAN Lot 12 Monument Ridge Subdivision Rebar and Cap LSNo. 19598 Lot 12 8.380 Acres± - SCALE: r"'100' Rebar and Cap LS S' ~~~e~~sg:mer f---11 SURVEYOR'S STA1EMENT I, MICHAEL J. LANGHORNE, A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, UCENSED UNDER T LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DO HEREBY SURVEY SHOWN HEREON WAS PREP. 14, 2008 BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT NGTHATTHISMAPISA TRUE REPRE GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS -GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor Street Grand Junction, CO 81505 Mr. Ed Wissler P.O. Box42 Parachute, Colorado 81635 June 6, 2008 Tel: (970) 242-8968 Fax: (970) 242-1561 gjldem@earthlink.net Re: Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, I 00 Dry Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. Dear Mr. Wissler: As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a geotechnical exploratory program at the above-referenced site. Three shallow exploration pits were excavated by the client in the vicinity of the proposed building pads as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were located West and East of the of the assumed residential building envelope and West of the of the assumed shop building envelope. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of 10 to II feet. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on 5-30-2008 . The purpose ofthese pits was to determine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The following laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to determine their relative engineering properties. ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification ASTM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil FHA-701 Expansive Soils, Soil PVC Meter Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration pit logs. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential and a shop foundation, but it is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Excavation Observation: Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. If the Mr. Ed Wissler Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, I 00 Dry Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. June 6, 2008 Page 2 soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable, additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations. Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an alluvial debris fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east/southeast along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt, and silty clay in the fmer portions, to gravelly silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles, and boulders in the coarser portions. Many strata of the finer-grained soils are oflow to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsible) properties. Soil Type No. I was classified as a Sandy Silt (ML) under the Unified Classification System. These soils are typical of the debris fan deposits in this general area. The soils are stratified, with some strata containing gravels of sandstone & siltstone fragments The moisture content varied from 7.6 %to 11.0 %, indicating a slightly damp soil. This material is of very low plasticity to non-plastic and oflow to moderate permeability. If this soil is found in a relatively dry condition, it may undergo slight expansion with the entry of small amounts of moisture, but it will undergo collapsenong-term consolidation upon the addition oflarger amounts of moisture. Expansion tests using the FHA PVC Meter were performed on remolded samples of the soil, and expansive pressures on the order of 491 psf at 1.6 % swell were found to be typical. This material will consolidate/collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. One dimensional consolidation tests using the consolidation apparatus ASTM D-2435 could not be performed due the presence of gravel sized fragments of siltstone and sandstone. If these soils are overexcavated, water soaked, and reworked according to recommendations contained in this report, this slight expansive and suspected slight collapse potential should be mostly mitigated. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this reworked soil has been typically found to be 1800 psf, with 3 50psf minimum dead load pressure required. Soil Type No. Ia was classified as a Sandy Silty Gravel (GM) under the Unified Classification System. These soils are common strata within the debris fan deposits in this general area. The soils are stratified. The moisture content varied from 4.5% to 8.3 %, indicating a slightly damp soil. This material is oflow plastici- ty to non-plastic and oflow to moderate permeability. This material will consolidate/slightly collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. If these soils are overexcavated, water soaked, and reworked according to recommendations contained in this report, this potential collapse potential should be mitigated. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this reworked soil was found to be 2500 psf, with 300 psfminimum dead load pressure required. Soil Type No. II was classified as a Silty Clay(CL-ML) under the Unified Classification System. These soils are typical of the debris fan deposits in this general area. The soils are stratified, with some strata containing gravels of sandstone & siltstone fragments The moisture content was found to be about 7.3 %, indicating a slightly damp soil. This material is oflow plasticity, oflow to moderate permeability, and was encountered in a low to medium density condition. If this soil is found in a relatively dry condition, it may undergo slight expansion with the entry of small amounts of moisture, but it will undergo collapsenong-term consolidation upon the addition oflarger amounts of moisture. Expansion tests using the FHA PVC Meter were performed on remolded samples of the soil, and expansive pressures on the order of 3 86 psf at 1.5 % swell were found to be typical. This material will consolidate/collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. One dimensional consolidation tests using the consolidation apparatus ASTM D-2435 could not be performed due the presence Mr. Ed Wissler Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, 100 Dry Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. June 6, 2008 Page 3 of gravel sized fragments of siltstone and sandstone. If these soils are overexcavated, water soaked, and reworked according to recommendations contained in this report, this suspected collapse potential should be mitigated. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this reworked soil was found to be 2000 psf, with 350 psfminimum dead load pressure required. Man-made Fill: The soils encountered in our test borings appear to be native to the site. All building foundations must penetrate any man-made fills present on the site at this time as well as any fills resulting from the excavation process. Careful examination of the open excavation will be necessary to determine the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior to the placement of concrete to ensure that materials of proper design bearing capacity have been exposed and that no soft spots or debris are present in the foundation area. A 24-hour notice is required for all field examinations to enable Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide service when needed. Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during drilling excavation on this site. In our opinion, the true free water surface is fairly deep in this area and hence should not affect construction. Seepage moisture may affect construction if surface drainage is not properly controlled. Foundation Tvoe Recommended: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, underlain by at least 1 foot of structural fill (may be native, non-plastic soils) and placed in accordance with the recommendations contained in this report, may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capac- ity of 1800 psf maximum and 350 psf minimum. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within ± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story slab-on-grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi-story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one-half live load for up to three stories. Structural Fill/Soil Improvement: For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fill is recommended to replace the upper metastable soils. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. The existing metastable soils should be removed to a minimum depth ofl foot below the proposed bottom footing elevation. The excavation/fill width is to extend at least 20 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore to ensure that an adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. Mr. Ed Wissler Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, I 00 Dty Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. June 6, 2008 Page 4 At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, it may be appropriate to extensively water soak the overexcavated portion ofthe site forat least I day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgrade soils are to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at least 6 inches. Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non free- draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade soils. Non-expansive native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (-3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content ±2%). The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To conftnn the quality ofthe compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2-foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not required for this foundation design. Reinforcing: The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. All foundation stemwalls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 12 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) on the order of 55 pcfwould be appropriate for the native soils. Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs Mr. Ed Wissler Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, I 00 Dry Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. June 6, 2008 Page 5 should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking ofthe slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of2% and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specifically sited by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building, and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not be limited to: • • • • • Metering the irrigation water . Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage . Encourage efficient landscaping practices . Enforcing reasonable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. Incorporating "xeriscaping" landscaping and irrigation techniques . A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Mr. Ed Wissler Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, 100 Dry Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. June 6, 2008 Page 6 Provided that all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2%). Cement Tvoe: Type II, Type I-II, or Type II-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type II, Type I-II, or Type II-V cement under any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of3 feet below fmished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-1 01) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils that do not possess a "significant potential for expansion." We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility to ensure that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage oftime, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable Mr. Ed Wissler Subsurface Soils Exploration, Residence & Shop, 100 Dry Creek Road, Battlement Mesa, CO. June 6, 2008 Page 7 conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering . Respectfully submitted, GJLD Job No. 93514-GJ CR/11CAL DRAINAGE ZONE TI\ICE TN£ WIDTH OF TNt ORIGINAL £>1CAVA1lON LIMIT ( VARIES -MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUilDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOil PREPARED B" to 8" DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. USE 'lOW WA 7ER USE' T'I?E PLANTS and/or "XERISCAPING" 7ECHNIQU£S WITHIN TN£ 'CRtnCAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. ... GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING TN£ NA 11VE SOILS BELOW TN£ 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE REWORKED .t COMPAC7ED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES 1lLLED for LANDSCAPING SOIL BACKFILL COMPAC7ED TO MINIMIZE__....- WA7ER SEEPAGE TO TN£ FOUNOA 1lON SOILS DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAIN CR/11CAL DRAINAGE ZONE TI\ICE TN£ WID TN OF" TNE ORIGINAL EXCAVA 1lON LIMIT ( VARIES -MINIMUM OF" S FEET F"ROM BU/LOJNG ) ROOF" DOWNSPOUT SOil PREPARED B" ta 8" DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. US£ 'LOW WA 7ER USE' T'I?E PLANTS and/or "XERISCAPING" 7ECHNIQU£5 WITHIN TN£ 'CRtnCAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. TNE NA 1lVE SOILS BELOW TNE 'CRtnCAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO B£ REWORKED .t COMPAC7ED FOR A MINIMUM OF" 12 INCHES DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT ' 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT DAlE: 9-16-2005 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS-GEOLOGISTS "'' ..., HONE: D-DRAIN1 SOILS DESCRIPTIONS DESCRIPTION f---.--Topsoil GW Gravel GP GM GC sw SP SM Well-Graded Gravel Poorly-Graded Silty Gravel Clayey Gravel Sand Well-Graded Sand Poorly-Graded Silly Sand SC Clayey Sand ML CL OL MH CH OH Pt GP/GM GP/GC t GM/GC • Silt Low-Plastic Clayey Sand Low-Plastic Organic Slit & Clay Low-Plastic Elastic Silt High-Plastic Clay High-Plastic Organic Clay · High-Plastic Peat Silty Gravel Well-Graded Clayey Gravel Well-Graded Silty Gravel Poorly-Graded Clayey Gravel Poorly-Graded Silty Clayey Gravel • 1 • I • SW/SM Silty Sand • ; ' t Well-Graded • • •• SW/SC ..... .. . . .. 1 I SP/SM 1 I I' I I I SP/SC I I r SMISC Clayey Sand Well-Graded Silty SaM· Poorly-Graded Clayey Sand Poorly-Graded Silty Clayey Sand CL·ML Silty Clay ROCK DESCRIPTIONS DESCRIPTION CONGLOMERATE SANDSTONE CLAYSTONE LIMESTONE DIORITIC ROCKS TUFF & ASH FLOWS METAQUARTZITE MARBLE Olher Metamorphic Rocks GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN· DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado SYMBOLS & NOTES !YU2.I. DESCRIPTION Wx SPT Standard Penetration Drive 09/06 ASTM D-1586 Disturbed Sample cs 09/06 D&M 09/06 ST BULK -- Numbers Indicate 9 Blows To drive the Sampler 'Spoon' 6" Into ground. 'California Lined Sample~ Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D-3550 Disturbed Sample Numbers Indicate 9 Blows To drive the Sampler 'Spoon' 6" into ground. 'Dames & Moore Lined Sampler' Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D-3550 Disturbed Sample Numbers Indicate 9 Blows To drive the Sampler 'Spoon' 6" into ground. Thin-Walled 'Shelby' Tube ASTM D-1587 2·1/2" I.D. 'Relatively Undisturbed Sample' Disturbed, Bulk Sample Disturbed Sample Free Water Table Weathered Rock Formation Test Boring Location· Test Pil Location Seismic or Resistivity Station Standard Penetration Drives are made by driving a standard 2"·od, 1-5/8" ld Split Spoon Sampler into the ground by dropping a 140 lb. weight 30", ASTM D-1586. CME Automatic Hammer used, unless noted • The Drive Shoe is Blunt and the sample is Disturbed. ModWied Penetration Drives are made by driving a 2-1/211 od,.1.875"1d California Spoon Sampler or a 3" od, 2-3/8" ld Dames & Moore Spoon Sampler into the ground by dropping a 140 lb. weight 30", ASTM D-3550. CME Automatic Hammer used, unless noted. The Drive Shoals Blunt and tlie sample is Disturbed. The Boring Logs show subsurface conditions al the dates and locations shown. It is not warranted that these Boring logs are representative of subsurface conditions at other times, or at olher locations near these Borings. EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS Form No. GJLDFORM-EXPL Drawn EMM MAPPING from GARFIELD COUNTY Web Site SKETCH From G .J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado PROJECT 100 DRY CREEK ROAD ~1 ./ ./ SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 D Creek Battlement Mesa Colorado Mr. Ed Wissler Date Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Job No . Drawn 93514-GJ EMM I I MAPPING from GARFIELD COUNTY Web Site SKETCH From G .J .L.D. Fi eld Personnel Notes GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Co nsultants Gr and Juncti on, Co lorado $ L r t ~Q I ...... f ·~ ,____, -,....;&-. --·- LOCATION DIAGRAM RESIDENCE & SHOP STRU CTU RES 10 0 D C r ee k , Battlemen t Mesa, C olo r ado Mr. E d Wiss ler Da te Par achute, Colorad o 6-6-2008 Job No . Drawn 93 514-GJ EMM SITE PLAN Lot 12 Monument Ridge Subdivision Sewer Telephone Manlwle Pedestal -w'"'"' Shut-off No SeAL£ 39.6' -- Rebar and Cap nlegible Site Benchmark Elev=5389.4' N00"17'47"W TP•'J.. 54.9' ~· ..-Propo~ed Slwf ~ · . 5.1.5 X 30.5 68.0' • . LTP·3 Proposed House D= 157'00'59" R=50.00' L=137.02' CB=N 45'17'35" E ...... 20.0' .................. ~ ...... ...... ~-- Rebar and Cap LSNo. 19598 PLAN Adapted From BOOKCLIFF SURVEY SERVICES, Inc. Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 D Creek Battlement Mesa Mr. Ed Wissler Parachute, Colorado Job No. Drawn 93514-GJ EMM Colorado Date 6-6-2008 1 EXPLORA liON PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: WEST SIDE of PROPOSED RESIDENCE Torvane DENSITY WATER (FT.) LO DESCRIPTION psf pcf % CL-ML SILTY CLAY w/SOME ORGANIC -I ML SANDY SILT LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY -I I Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP -, I ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 5-·-I STRATIFIED CARBONATES 5 GRAVEL SIZED FRAGMENTS of SILTSTONE & SANDSTONE -I~ ML SANDY SILT LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY ST 91.9 7.6% _, I I Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP -0 ~ GM SILTY, SANDY GRAVEL SANDSTONE BOULDERS to 12" Bulk 4.5% .-I 0 Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP 10 10_ I Ia I 0 -ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf - - 15-15 Pit Total Depth: 11' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-30-2008 Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, BY CLIENT EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: EAST SIDE of PROPOSED RESIDENCE Torvane DENSITY WATER (FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION psf pcf % CL-ML SILTY CLAY w/SOME ORGANIC -I ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf -' LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY _I • I 5-& I GRAVEL SIZED FRAGMENTS of SILTSTONE & SANDSTONE GM SILTY, SANDY GRAVEL Sl. DAMP 5 -1 0 Ia Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA CARBONATES ST 90.4 8.3% _I STRATIFIED LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY -0 ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf -I GM SILTY, SANDY GRAVEL SANDSTONE BOULDERS to 12" Bulk 5.0% .-• Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP 10 10_ I I 6 Ia • LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY - - - 15-15 Pit Total Depth: 11' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-30-2008 Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, BY CLIENT LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 Dry Creek, Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION Mr. Ed Wissler Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 93514-GJ EMM 2 EXPLORATION PIT NO. 3 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: WEST SIDE of PROPOSED SHOP STRUCTURE Torvane DENSITY WATER (FT.) LC DESCRIPTION jpsf pcf % CL-ML SILTY CLAY w/SOME ORGANIC -II Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP - -1, I ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ' GRAVEL SIZED FRAGMENTS of SILTSTONE & SANDSTONE 5-I SOFT MUDSTONE FRAGMENTS 5 ·- _I CL-ML SANDY SILTY CLAY LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY I II Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP ST 98.7 7.3% -D I 1' SANDSTONE BOULDERS lo 12" -, ML SANDY SILT LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY Bulk 11.0% 10-I b I ·-O I Sl. COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP 10 STRATIFIED - - - 15-15 Pit Total Depth: 10' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-30-2008 Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, BY CLIENT EXPLORATION PIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Torvane DENSITY WATER (FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION psf pcf % - - - 5-·-5 - - - 10-·-10 - - - 15-15 Pit Total Depth: NO Free Water During Observation: Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 Drv Creek, Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION Mr. Ed Wissler Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 93514-GJ EMM Soil Sample: SANDY SILT (ML) Sample No.: I (Typical) 1 Geolo9ic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 7.6% Pit No.: 1 Depth: 7' In-Place Density (pet): 91.9 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTto CLAY 100 ......, "' Effective size 0.003 mm 90 \ Cu 28.3 Cc 9.8 80 70 ~ Plastic Limit (PL) N.P. \ Liquid Limit (LL) 0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) t:!.f, c: ' . $kempton's Activity 0.0 "iii gj 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) c.. . Shrinkage Ratio -§ 40 ~ Q) c.. 30 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD ~ Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 1,11~ 12.5 9.5 4.M 2 o.85 0.425 o.15 o.gj&, o.o2 o.oo5 article Gra Size {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-~98 A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 SizeAIIOW!;!d 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 1.6% Swell 3/4" 19 !!~ Sam11ler Displacement 300 psi: 491 psf 1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): ~sf #20 0.85 97 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 94 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 80 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 53.7 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm 0.02 18 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 12 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @._Q£f SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 Dry Creek, Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION Mr. Ed Wissler Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 93514-GJ EMM Soil Sample: SILTY, SANDY GRAVEL (GM) Sample No.: Ia (fypical) 2 Geolo9ic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b:t LRS Natural Water Content (w): 4.5% Pit No.: 1 Depth: 8' In-Place Density (pcf): Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoCLAY 100 rx. Effective size 0.090 mm 90 \ Cu 144.4 Cc 0.0 80 ~ ' . I . Plastic Limit (PL) N.P. 70 h Liquid Limit (LL) ll !'..... Plasticity Index (PI) N.P. C>60 ......, c: ' Skempton's Activity QJ! 'iii ~50 ~ Shrinkage Limit (SL) a. .. ....... Shrinkage Ratio -5i 40 "" ~ ' Q) a. 30 ~ 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD '\ Peak Res . .... 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 Cohesion: psi 125 75 50 37.5 25 1J/p 12.5 9.5 4.M 2 o.85 o.425 o.15 o.~m,o.o2 o.oo5 article Gra Size {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698A D 4718-0% Rock Correction 3" 75 100 Max. Dry Density : pel pel 2" 50 77 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 77 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 67 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell 3/4" 19 64 B~ Samgling Displacement 300 psi: psi 1/2" 12.5 59 3" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 56 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.75 51 SMALL Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 45 SANDSTONE Unconfined Compression (qu): ~sf #20 0.85 41 UP TO 12" COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psi #40 0.425 37 IN PIT SPOIL CONSOLIDATION: @ psi #100 0.15 29 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi #200 0.075 20.4 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm 0.02 12 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 9 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @.__Qgf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 Dry Creek, Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION Mr. Ed Wissler Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 93514-GJ EMM r-· Soil Sample: SANDY SILTY CLAY (CL-ML) Sample No.: II (Typical) 3 Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 7.3% Pit No.: 3 Depth: 6' In-Place Density (pel): 98.7 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY 100 r'\ Effective size mm ..... 90 r\. Cu Cc 80 70 ~ Plastic Limit (PL) 21 Liquid Limit (LL) ~ 0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) !! c Skempton's Activity 0.1 ·c;; :{l 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) 0.. -Shrinkage Ratio ~ 40 (]) 0.. 30 \ 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD ~ Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 125 75 50 37.5 25 1,\l~ 12.5 9.5 4.~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.9JJi, 0.02 0.005 Cohesion: psf article Gra Size {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pel 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: ~Swell 3/4" 1g Elll Samgl!lr Displacement 300 psi: lli psf 1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): ~sf #20 0.85 93 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 89 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 79 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi #200 0.075 67.1 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm 0.02 32 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 18 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @._Q£f SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 Dry Creek, Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION Mr. Ed Wissler Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 93514-GJ EMM SAMPLE SOIL INITIAL FINAL MOIST. SWELL EXPANSION Initial SAMPLE LOCATION TYPE MOIST. MOIST. CHANGE AMOUNT RING SOIL DRY DENSITY R-Remolded uses % % % % psf/% psf pcf 1 @7' R ML 7.3% 35.3% 28.0% 1.6% 307 491 96.6 3@6'R CL-ML 7.8% 24.7% 16.9% 1.5% 257 386 101.0 TEST REFERENCE -The Character and Identification of Expansive Soils, Soil PVC Meter Federal Housing Administration, Tech. Studies Program, FHA 701, Lambe, T.W. 1960. THE TEST APPARATUS & ORIGINAL PROCEDURE IS DESCRIBED IN PUBLICATION FHA-701. THE PROCEDURE WAS SLIGHTLY MODIFIED BY LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY, pre 1965, TO ALLOW INTACT (NATURAL) SPECIMENS SAMPLED USING 2.5" dia. SHELBY TUBES and ATTEMPTING TO MATCH MORE EXPANSIVE SPECIMENS WITH 'STIFFER' PROVING RINGS. A LATER MODIFICATION ALLOWED A 2.5" dia.SAMPLE FROM A 'DAMES & MOORE' DRIVEN SAMPLER. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE INTERPRETATION of TEST RESULTS THE MODIFIED PROCEDURE RESULTS ARE USUALLY UTILIZED FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION SYSTEMS ASSUMING THAT SOME MOVEMENT OF THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM IS TO BE ALLOWED. FOR DEEP FOUNDATION SYSTEMS (DRILLED PIERS), THE MEASURED EXPANSIVE PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE ABOUT 70% DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, AS NO MOVEMENT OF THE PIERS IS DESIRABLE. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado FHA PVC METER TESTING RESIDENCE & SHOP STRUCTURES 100 D Creek Battlement Mesa Colorado Mr. Ed Wissler Date Parachute, Colorado 6-6-2008 Job No. Drawn 93514-GJ EMM 8130/03 ~c ~ ~7. Building Guide Colorado Chapter of the International Code Council Single Family Residential One Story Detached Garage How to Use this Guide Provide two sets of plans and complete the following: 1 Complete this Building Guide by filling in the blanks on page two and three, and indicating which construction details will be used. 2 Provide 2 Plot Plans (site plan) showing dimensions of your project or addition and its relationship to existing buildings or structures on the property and the distance to existing property lines, drawn to scale. 3 Fill out a building permit application. The majority of permit applications are processed with little delay. The submitted documents will help determine if the project is in compliance with building safety codes, zoning ordinances and other applicable laws. The Colorado Chapter of the International Code Council is a professional organization seeking to promote the public health, safety and welfare to building construction. We appreciate your feedback and suggestions. To obtain a master copy of this building guide, please write to the . Colorado Chapter of the International Code Council, P.O. Box 961, Arvada, CO 80001. This handout was developed by the Colorado Chapter of the International Code Council as a basic plan submittal under the 2003 International Residential Code. It is not intended to cover all circumstances. Check with your Department of Building Safety for additional requirements. 1 8/30/03 Single Family Residential One Story Detached Garage Directions 1. Fill in the blanks on pages 2 and 3 with dimensions and materials whi ch will be u se d to build the structure. Please print legibly . 2. Indicate in the check boxe s on page 3 which d etail from page 4 will b e use d. Note: Heated garages ma y require special provi sions . Floor Plan I-----=======~D~i=m=e=n=si=o~n~.3~£2~·==J Lo cate and detail bracing Indicate rafter or truss direction Show door and window header sizes and location and size of landing in front of door 3'k" minimum concrete slab ) Double 2x4 or 2x6 trimmers each end of overhead door header Garage doo r opening ~ ,I I ={Garage door opening width Fl oor slope ~ }=-I· * 2' 8" minimum, with plywood sheathing on ou tside of entire wall with hold downs . If less than 2' 8", engineering may be required. This handout was developed by the Colo rado Chapter of the International Code Council as a basic plan submittal under the 2003 International Residenti al Code. It is not intended to cover all circumstances. Check with your Department of Building Safety for additional requirements . ·I --------------------------------------------------~2 8130/03 Single Family Residential One Story Detached Garage Note : For roots with slope s less tha n 4:1 2, fo llo w manufacture r's IB"'fruss or 2x _rafte rs spaceda" O.C. (example: Put checkmark in box -or· 2 x 10 Rahers Spaced 24' O.C.) Minimum lx __ ridge board (example: 1 x 12) Building Section Provi de roo f tie downs Solid 2x blocking between rafters th at are 2x12 or greater . . . :J Foundation Detail A ,Jtt Foundation Detai l 8 (see page 4) (example : 11ayer 15K felt) Ceiling Insulation ___ _ (II heated· example: R·38) 2x_ceilin g joists @ _O.C. (example: 2 x 8 @ 24' O.C.) Double 2xd_top plate (example: 2 x 6) Span,aq ' !f" (example: 23' 5') Ce iling height !j"" (exampl e: 87 (II heared ·example: R·19 Fiberglass BaNs) Footing size£x_& (example: 8' x 16') ...._ _____________ ...._~ \ -~ lr~ This handou t was developed by the Colora d o Chapter of the International Code Cou nc il as a basic plan su bmittal under th e 2003 International Residential Code. It is not intended to cover all circumstan ces. Check with your Department of Building Safety for additional requirements. frpp\y 3 8130/03 Single Family Residential One Story Detached Garage Foundation Detail A Foundation Detail B ottom plate sha ll be min. 8" above grade, or be t reated wood or decay resistive wood 3 W' Min imum Concrete Slab a mi nimum of 1" W' x 10" stee l anchor bolts 6'·0" O.C. max., 7" min . penetration max . 12" from corner and 12 " from each end of plate (min. 2 bolts per plate). f Bottom plate shall be min . 8" above grade, or J be treated wood or decay resistive wood Lap siding ove r foundation ~ ~?.-'..;;., Finished grade --....,.---I-:--r-::-.;:-:::-: ~~~::;-~:-1, ; :!:~;;;: :co.::;<: · .. ,·;' .• D .· •;. ''"' 3 ,,. Minimum co ncrete slab Note: Check with local buil din g department for swelli ng soils. Caissons may be requi red. \{hi'• .• ..t ..... ·;::·, ...... \ ~,& ,·::· .. ; ... .. "'-:~;;·~~y::;.: Fiberboard expansion joint ~.: :. :::,...-..:·,::_:-- 'h.~:;·): see ~ t • 5 .;~y.::l:{. IJ 1 ~ a e." , ~ L.\. \ ~ "'''l "' ,. .:3 ~ . :J~j r •• :: ,> ) jLJi. &.1 ~. I R-1 ot-t- __,_____:.::;;.)\~.;:.:-:;-;'::::;:· _1. 3" 7{ tt &v..t flt: ~~ 36"min. ---#4 rebar min . conti nuo us top of stemwall & at footi ng This handout was developed by the Colorado Chapter of t he Internation al Code Council as a basi c plan subm ittal under the 2003 International Residential Code. It is not intended to cover all c ircu mstances. Check with your Department of Building Safety for additional req uirements. ~----------------------------------------------~4