Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application - Permit
I Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945·8212 Fa x: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line : 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. _)J D2 2 Parcel No : 2407 -053-040-006 Locality : Battlement Creek Village Sec. 1, lot 6, blk. 4 Job Address: 421 Battlement Creek Trail , Parachute --------------------~------~------------------ Use of Building: --------~s/~f d~w~e~lli :_:_,ngL_o::_:_n:_::c_:_:rw~s-'=--p :_::w..:_:_:ith~o::J.:p-=-e _n !:_pa:_:_ti _:_o_:_an___:_d:_::a....:..:tt __ . G-=-a:_:_ra:._~g!...:_e ______ __ Owner: Sorensen, Jory Contractor: Tass Crow (Crow Enterprises) Fees: Plan Check : $ 1,0 24 .50 Sept ic: Bldg Perm it : $ 1,576.15 Other Fees : Total Fees: $ 2,600.65 Clerk: ~I!J{2{5r£> Date : _:)Lll/0~ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Use of Build ing: 9 Des cri be Work: 10 Class of Work: 1 1 Garag e: 12 Dri ve way Permit: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDI NG PERMIT APPLI CATION 10 8 81h St reet , S uite 401 , Glenwood Springs, Co 8 160 1 Ph one : 970 -945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 /Ins pec ti on Li ne: 97 0-384-5003 www.garfi e ld -c ou nty .com e w o Alt erati on o Add itio n Sept ic : Attached o Detac hed o i SDS Owners val u ati o n of Work: $ NOTICE A lt Ph : qr O· ZSO-3 A uthorit)'. Trus a ppti cation for a Building Permit must be sign ed by the Owne r of the property, descri bed above, or an authorized age nt. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate tetter of au thority, si gned by th e Owner, must be provided with thi s Appli cation. Le gal Access. A Bui ldin g Permi t cannot be iss ued without pr oo f of le ga l and adeq uate access to th e propeny for purposes of inspec ti ons by the Bu ilding De panment. Other Permits. Multi ple separate permi ts may be requ ired : (I) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Per mit , (3) another permit required for use on the prope n y id entifi ed above , e.g. State or County Hi ghway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permi t. Vo id PermiL A Buil din g Pe rmit becomes nu ll and void if the work auth orized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of iss uance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days aft er commencement CERT I FICATI ON I hereby certify that I have read thi s Applicati on and that the infor mati on co ntai ned above is true and correct. I und erstand that the Buildin g Depanmem accepts the Ap plication, along with the plans and specifications and othe r data submitted by me or on my be half (submitta ls), ba sed upon my cen ification as to a cc uracy. Ass umin g comple te ness of the submittal s and approval of thi s Appli cation, a Building Permit wi ll be iss ued granting permis sion to me , as Ow ner , to constru ct the stru ctu re(s) and fa cilities detai led on th e submi ttals reviewed by the Buildin g De panme nt. In considerati on of the issuance of the Building Permi t, I agree that ! and my age nts will comply wi th prov isions of any federal, slate or local law re gulati ng the work and the Garfi e ld County Building Code, ISDS regulati ons and appli ca bl e land use regula tio ns (County Regulati on(s)). I acknow ledge that the Buildi ng Permi t ma y be suspended or revok ed , upo n notice fro m the County, if the locati on, constructi on or use of the stru cture(s) and faci li ty(ies), descri bed above, are not in compli ance with Cou nt y Regul ation (s) or any other applicable Jaw. I he reby grant permi ss io n to the Buil ding Depanmentto e nter the propeny, described a bove, to inspect the work. I further ackno wledge that the iss uance of the Buildi ng Permit does not prevent the Bui lding Official from: (I ) req uiring the co rrec tion of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered aft er issuance ; or (2) stoppi ng co nstru cti on or use o f the stru ct ure(s) or fac iti ty(ies) if such is in violati on o f County Regu lation(s) or any oth er applicabl e law. Review of thi s App lication , including sub mittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Depanment do not constitute an acceptance of resp onsibility or li ab ility by the Cou nty of e rrors , omi ssions or discrepa ncies . As the Ow ner, I ackn owledge that responsibili ty for comp li ance with federal, state and loca l laws and County Regulations res t with me and my auth ori zed age nts , in cludi ng wi tho ut limitation my arclli tect des igner, en ginee r and/ or builder. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAV E READ AND UNDERSTAND TH E NOTICE & CERT I FI CAT ION ABOVE : OWNERSlSIGNATURE DATE Jo ' STAFF USE ONLY S pecial Conditions: A dju sted Va lu ation : Pl a n Check F ee: P ermit F e e: M a nu h ome Fee: M is e Fees: 2.03~_565 .. 84 I , oz. <1 . 5o ti s 7b . 15 I S DS ~e;J I/( Tota l Fees: Fees Pa id : B a la n ce Due: BP No & Issue Da te : , 1 ~S No & Issu ed Da t e: 2 6 06'. 0 5 f ODq ,'1 <.f 1,5qo 7/ J lh72. 7 /1? / Setbac ks: O CC G r oup: R3 Co n s~B Zoning: BW G DE PT' ~ p f-N~EPD_ #$ -J ~ ;_tJ/-{J(~ d_~ ~ \' ,...,.,. A PPROVAL DATE AN'~AL l'>ATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN. ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS 1fiGNATURE DATE Bapplicationdecember2007 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant 5oe.et1>e vt Date 6 /i CJ/oB I I Building I Engineered Foundation _· __ Driveway Permit / Surveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setb acks /Grade/Topography 30% / Attach Residential Plan Review List ./'Minimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes __ Fire Department Review /Valuation Determination/Fees V Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker / Attach Conditions / Application Signed / Plan Reviewer To Sign Application /Parcel/Schedule No. / 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms . ___ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES : ~oad Impact Fees fl.A.Hc;flD RC Approval -~_Graaddee/T/Topography 40 % f{~~~ng Issues V subdivision Plat Notes VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date .::S:,::o.:..::re~n.:.::se:.:.:n:...._ ___ ----:-__ ~-----Subdivision ...;4.:;2.:..1 .:;B.:;att:.:.:l;.;;em=en.:..;t...;:C;.;..re.:..::e;.;;;k....;;T.:..ra;;.;i,;_l -----Lot/Block .::6:..:11:..:::9.:..:12:.::0..:.0.:..8 __________ Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valu ation Garage: Valuation Craw l Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valu at ion Cove red Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valu ation Total Valuation 2238 sf sf sf sf X $74.68 2238 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33 .68 681 sf X $18.00 2238 sf X $9.00 sf X $24.00 336 sf X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Battlement Creek Village, Section I Lot 6, Block 4 Crow Enterprises, Tass Crow s 167 ,133 .84 0 .00 12,258 .00 20,142.00 4,032 .00 0 .00 203,565.84 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the fmish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X "5<-<rveJ Co."'f/r?k 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. X Yes -----''------- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes X 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? / Yes )<.. -----''------ 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencies Yes -.,< ..-.. 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes )<.. 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clear:Xuired between wood and earth? Yes --, No ____ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits?"-/ Yes _.?<.__ No ----- 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? ......_/' Yes L::::::___ --+--'----- I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructi~ Yes_~,-~'--"'---- II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof raft~s o~oists or trusses? Yes __ ~~--=--- 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns :x:::s? Yes - ' 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roo (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mo~ Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No · ' 3 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes ')<( No ______ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ·-r<: 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ~ 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No ______ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes >< 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel ofland created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes )< 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes )< 22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes :><:" No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes X 24. Do you und~d that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Y es. __ ~L..:.==--- 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ·><.. • 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zonedi~ Yes_-F~-----'"'----- 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the ~County Building Department? Yes_~-r-"'-..--- 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application these changes? Y es--..-L--:>.....~- 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes X ' 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes ~ No _____ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes ~ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building?:-:/ Y es_~_z:::::,__,£-..:::::__ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given fot_an_):gent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes. __ _2S..,_<--=--- 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes X 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes X~...---- 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? ~ Yes ~ (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuX a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes · 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certifica~teof upancy? Yes ---+----'---- I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Date Phone:q1o-q Y/S'-0(;;1-/}: (days); 5C\ V'V) e.. (evenings) Project Name: ~re.VI.5e.\e:l ffoMe, Project Address: 4ZI f:rx+Heme..± C,gJ Tro..; f Po tt:\(h !Al-e co '1$Jtf,3s j } 6 Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqDec2007 7 FROM :ST JOHN MIDDLE SCHOOL FRX NO. :9702855714 ~~~ Ocwl·J fVIt~i hf)NI :s Cl J s", ~ 1"1~ L-V") Decemb er 30, 2008 M &N StUCCO 2333 K% Rd. Orand Jw1ctiM, CO . 81505 (970) 640-3093 Garfield County Buildin2 Department To Whom It May Concern : Jan. 06 2009 11:31RM Pl The insulfoam lath product applied on 42 1 Battlement Creek Trail was properly applied . by certified applicato rs, according to product specifica~ions set forth by the engineers at Insulfoam Products manufacturers. M & N Stuc co will warranty the product for 15 years. Sinctlrely, Sean Taber M&N Stucco at+U, TI41Lft f1~~S 1 !>cu7 fttpct 0-[J. :fof/..1' :s,<R ~s~ 1 -Iff-, l.J(4__ ~ s ""{'--LCL<O ~ t.LJ Sti A-~ Hl /19 39'\fd 9NHJ.3.1.S~1d~ REC .EIVED DEC 0 1 2008 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Send to: Attention~ tW-{_ Office location: Kris S. Es s ex r•1~ Fax number: .Jj Jj lj lo -3 I -.:/ )o [] [] Total pages, including cover: 2 Comments: From: Date: 303 431 3739 lnsulfoam 12601 East 33rd Ave. unit #110 Aurora, Co. 80011 Office 303 366 7730 Fax 303 366 7742 /fr,'r E _).);:_A 11/ ,rt/o! Office location: Phone number: / 'j J _j :Jo.3 --777 LJ [] p. 1 Kris S. Essex 303 431 3739 WATER PENETRATION TEST OF AN INSULATION MATERIAL (A-TECH) APPLIED TO A STANDARD STUD WALL CONSTRUCTION Prepared for lnsulfoam LLC, a Carlisle Company. INTRODUCTION: The following report pre&~nts the results of a water penetration test conducted on a wall insulation material (A-Tech*}, manufactured by lnsulfoam U.C. This analysis was completed on June 9, 1998. The purpose of the testing was to determine the performanca of the insulation material relative to water penetration through the material and corresponding joints between the panels. The tesl methodology used was from the proposed revision to the Acceptance Criteria for Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (AC24-R2·0698), Section 6.7 .1. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: The sample tested was comprised of 2' x 4' square edge panels of R·Tech Insulation material attached to an 8' x a• wall section. The test specimen DID NOT LEAK through the material or the taped joints. Section 6.7.1 of the Acceptance Criteria referred above was not followed in every respect as to the construction of the wall system. However, the testing conducted was more extensive as to the performance of the waterproof coating since !iQ exterior materials were applied (i.e. metal lath with stucco). In addition, the normal construction of a wall assembly using R·Tech is with 4' x 8' panel sectlons.ln this case, 2'x 4' panels were examined in order to focus the testing on the seam performance In a more rigorous scenario. One 2' x 4' sample was weighed prior to the testing and weighed 0.828 pounds. and immediately after the test the same sample weighed 0.829 pounds. This indicated that the panel did not absorb water but effectively diverted it away from the surface. SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION: Product Type: A-Tech Insulation (Expanded Polystyrene with polymeric film laminated to each side) Product Description: Z x 4' size panels, 1" thick Type I EPS with polymeric film Wall Construction: TEST METHOD: 8' x 8' SIMdard wood stud wall, S1uds 16" on·oontor. Square edge A-Tech applied to wall and anchored with 6-penny ringshank nails and 15116" diameter plastic washers (every 12" O.C. horizontally and 16" O.C. vertically). Joints between the A-Tech samples were seated with polyethylene tape. The tape was applied by hand and included irregularities such as wrinkles and fish mouths. Other irregularities were due to the tape being applied over the attachment fasteners. The waJI assembly was placed into a chamber equipped to simulate a wind driven rain. A uniform water delivery rate of 5 GPH/te, and test pressure difference of 6.24 psf (equivalent to a so MPH wind) was applied across the entire exterior wall assembly for a period of 75 minutes. Visual observation during the entire test duration was used to verify for water leakage through the panels and/or the seams. Before the application of the A-Tech panels, one 2' x 4' sample was weighGd. After completion of the testing. the "befora" sample was weighed agaln to determine if any moisture was absorbed by the panel. REMARKS: The wall assembly of the A-Tech material, and corresponding taped seams, was effective for diverting water freely down the exterior face. No migration of water was observed through the test specimen or the taped seams. The testing was conducted with an aggressive approach to verily that the A-Tech material, when used in conjunction with exterior construction materialS applied to the face of it. win protect the Interior side by not allowing any water accumulation. The proposed Acceptance Cr1teria approach to this testing was to visually observe the test specimen throughout the duration of the water exposure to confirm that no leakage occurred through the material and/or seams. In this case, the A-Tech was fully exposed as the waterproof coating but also provides insulation properlies to the exterior wall. lnlormatlon am slalroonls in 1his report arc deriVed from malcriaJ, lnklrmallon atld/or spccH~tb~ r~rm'~hcd by lhe Cllen! and ClClcude aJTf expressed or Implied warrantin:s as to the lttlleSS Of the materoa.J tesiOOor an~lylr!d 10~ any panicolar pu1poso or use. This rcp:on is the conllaem.lal properly ol oYr cUont and may root be usOO tor ndvertising purposes. Thls rep:oM shoU ro::.t be mproduccd e:.~ceplo!ull, wHhout written appro~al (If this l~bmalory. TM reoorrln'9 of !alsc, loctHioUl\ nr traudolcnt!UitBml!nl~: or enl001\ on thl:s docomon! may be punished as a telnny unrlcr fooeral Statutos includng Federal UtwT~Ie 18. Chapter 47. p.2 Anchorage,AK I Ken~WA I DllCOn,CA I Chl~o.CA I S31tlakeCrty.UT I Pho~nix,AZ I Aurora. CO I Mead f'I:E I M~liin,TX I Anderson SC I Lak.e~nd.FL (S07) :279-9407 (206) 2~2·94:24 (707)678-6900 (909) 591·7425 (SOt) 401.{1081 (602) 269·227:2 (303) 36S.77W (402) 624.S61t (254) 804.0020 (864) 22.Wsoo (864):224.Q900 4020.05108 As we lead normal lives, we should not have to be concerned whether the buildings where we live, work, or go to school are affecting our health, Unfortunately, there has been increasing interest lately in the potential damaging effects that mold anq milcJew can have in buildings. With 9.efect claims and insUrilm:e costs rising due to mold issue~,. choosing bUilding produqs prov¢n to be MOLD. RESI.STANT is a necessity. For ar~:~itects, contractors, 01 owners of buildinQ<, why ri.sk no,t (rs]ng NIOi.D RESISTANT prOducts? • lfvM ff,IIJfttiJIII·'f£Y:h iumltl/1111/ 2£./.2b£!?0./.6:WOJj The following is an excerpt from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Moisture Control in Schools and Commercial Buildings": ·Molds can IJe found almost anywhere; they can grow on virllt<~lly <~ny organic substance, as long as. moisture and oxyge-n are present. There arc rnolds that can gcow on wood, pHpe:r, C"(11'pet 1 foods, and insulation. When excessive moistUl'e accumulates in buildings or on building materials, rnt>ld growth will often occur, pat·ticularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or unaddressed. It ifi impossible to climl:mtll.:. J::Jll mold and mold spores in the indoor environment. However, mold gmwth c~m be conlrolled indoors by eontndling: Hll)isl.lJn::: indoors. Molds reproduce by making spores. that usually cannot he seen without magnifit:ili(m. Mold spmes waft through the indoor and outdoor air continually. When muld spores land 011 a damp spot indoors. they may beg.in growing mtd digesting whar.cvcr they are growing on in order to survive. Molds gradually destroy the things they grow on. Many types uf rnnld l.":xist. All molds have the polt!ntialto cause health effecls. Molds can produce altcrgcns that can trigger allergic real.! Lion::; or even asthma attacks in people alk;rgic to mold. Other& are known to produce potent toxins and/or it'l'itants. p,,lentitJI health CCHW{~ms are an important reason lo prevent mold growth and to terncditatc/clcan up any cxi~ting lndom· rnolt.J growth. Since mold requires water to grow~ it is importanl.lo prevent moistm-e problems in huilding:s. Moismre prohlcn'lS cun have. many causes, including uncontrolled humidity. Sornc moisture problems in buildings huve been linked to changes in building constmction practiecx du1ing the 1970's, Rtrs, and 90's, Some ofthe<c changes have. resulted in buildings that arc ti~htly sealed, bm may lack adequate ventilation, fxltcntially leading to moisture buildup. Building matel'ials, suc-h as drywall, may not allow moisture-. to escape easily. Moi~ture. problems may includo. roof leaks, landscaping or gutters that direct water inll) or under the building_ and unvcntcd combustion appliances." (U.S. Env'1ronrncntal Protection Agency, Mold RttmC'diation in Schon/.\· t.md Commercial Bulldinf.:·'"-MMch 2001) TESTING M€THODS The tf';,ting wcs p('do1mmJ by Fibi?Tflllimt Analy~h:..l! S·~rvl~(';; 11nd th£> tt:!~t method wa> b,,~cd on il modified Vf"rsion of ASTM ( /39 "fhrel! u..:1 !ifi~!d :;trains of fungi were UK-d w h1CJL'Uia!P tllP-In~ulfoam t'Xp<lnded J)Oiy:;tyrHl£> and th€-contro!'!.. The· thrt't:' stc.:1im teo;tpd werl!' A~~u:rgi!ll!~ niw~r. AspPtfji!lw; v('r~kokll,:.md Slilt~hybotr_v~ charta rum. lhc .Si.11J'\):Jb W(!rc! ht(\JbatecJ fttr )t'Y<~n dt.y~. Al;the elld of thL· Sl'Yt!ll d,1yc..thegrowth was mr!aswcd ;md f{'COTd('!d.•TI1e test w11s p{'r(O!nli!d 3 tlill<:!~ indt!pendr-ntly Thr~ I(•HIIt~ ~uggest thnt thf'-tri'a!Nl fPS ~;,mp!~s wrre-not c~1r11:Judv~ l.ll I mold !Jl't.>wth ,,~no ljrcJWth was :::<>P-n on any of th1~ trl!<:~ll·!d ~nmp!es A NER-631 ~Q\ "-.__:-; .. '\l!J ER-3414 • M~;~.d, Nr.brnlikn e Salt l&~& Ci!y, Ulo:~h OAAI"iviUIQA. Af>W/~ Ill Cl'lino, C:Jiilornia •Col:~mbuA, Clhkl •1./j~EIIMd. norid~ (102! 624-Mll (80!) 956·2!1011 (!l(lr) t~7U-9-1-07 (909) Sil!-742/i (614)4UIHH4 {663) 686·11879 Disclaimers: Nntir.n: Th~r~111l JJ!a~!k; i11~u~lions ;ue ~uriJbu!!libli! and ~hou!rt hn l'rnlr.~!Boj fmn1 HAtll\1 ~rl<lolh111 hut &a~ru-!.. They ~hould l!o in~t;~Uart wilh r.Q(I~ - ¥Co,;11olllbh:, lh~rmAl b~rric"' or ur.OO In approwed oll<>m.,tili<> ""n~tru<~!l(•"~ li'Riulfo.n1n 111•5~ uull>~ ~~hlr,fQr incido'1Uil And oon!aquerrti~l clnmA[lA~ (ilr~t:tly 01 i!\dirc~Uy 01\l'"<IAinQI;III)o' tuly lllll!:i t<.:~U~ed l>y opplic~~on of tha~A QIJOdfJ hOI iu ~I"J'.nrrtnnr.l) wl(h wut~~ll prim!!d prod~ in!lruction or IN Mhnr than fhl\ hl\$1'1.111\1 ~-lnaiJ!lt>e!ll'e iebil!y ill I»V-o-~yirMr.d to rr:plnr.llMMI ('If OO!e<.;ll\l~ uullli11.I\J'Ij r.l~iM *h~ll bi!J <ieamall ~ivod unle~~ mndo in wtitill{f fo lni!!AIOIIl!l w~l1in 30 o,l~~"" tJI o.hwv~•Y· IMUifO~Itl U & dlllls10n ot Pr<;;IJl]or llldustrl.-.& -maclr 111 th~ USA * AurotD. C:nh"Jra(lo •KI!n\1, W;n;hinotnn en~Jton CaliiOtnia * P/v:lc:nlK, Amnn!l • [)!!tiRe. Tl.lu& • Auderoon. Soulh Cotro!in.1 (j03] :Hiro•7730 (206} 242-!1424 (707} 678-MOO (~132) 2M·::!~7::! {800) 228-4412 (884) 224-0!100 www.insultoam.ootn W!PIONEER 3166 Perkins Drive, Grand Junction, Colorado 61504 P.O . B"x 280 ·Clifton, Colorado 81520·0280 (970) 434·8628 - 1 ·800·955 ·2013 FIV< (970) 434·2732 MATERIALS BRANCH OFFICES · WEST SLOPE ~8 ~rl ~~n Ave.· P.O. Box48'1 • Silv &rthome . CO 80 498 • (970) 468·8SOB ·FAX (970) 468·~7 455 Ur.dbergh Ortve ·Gypsum, CO 8fe3 7 • (970) 328·1210-FAX (!170) l28·1223 Mailing Addrtse: P.O. Box 4031 • F.agle, CO 81 63 1 30 22 Elk Rive r Roed. Unit •ll · St,~mboal $piing ,, CO 80487 • (970) 870 -1600 ·FAX (970) 870·8190 Complete Drywall, ln~vlapon, Stucco & Acoustical Supply Service I . FAX COVER SHEET . RECEIVED Nov 11 zoo s GARFI EL BUILDING f COUNTy PLANNING Please deliver the following pages to: _ bur't; t\l. Lou~1 Name: company: From: "Se-u. {\ ~~~~A·~------------------------------- Location: __,.(..._?....:..'~~--__.:_--.---------- Comments : ~~(~ ~-t_ 1v~ f'f\.V~~~ t D t 'Ytvv~ OA '\~~ · ~N\\\t_~\: ( ~~\\. \t~ \ ~r N\, \ ~ \\0 ~~'. 'I ~~v\'to ~tt..~ l-\e.~~ M ~4 ~tJ, ":\ J ~Li. "fu t "'- ~ \~) C.k l) 1\ ~ ~ \\t-~ ..w( (AJ-.A~.' 1)~1\.,___ ___ _ Number of pages transmitted, including cover sheet -~ \ ~~"\D-~Bt.\~ ~ ~l D \-i \ ~~D-~~~-~t~~ ~\ ?f*-. JJ D~~ ~ ~ Description R~Tech is a high-performance nyn.i insulation conaisting of a superior dosed.cell. lightweight and resilient expanded polystyreM (EPS) with advanced polymeric laminate racers. R-Tech ili available with factory adhore:d metallic-reflective facers, white facers or a combination of the two. The core of R-Tech is the same high-quality as our lnsuiFoam• brand insulations and meets or exceeds the requirements of ASTM C578, Type I. Standard Specification for Rigid, CRIIuiRr Pnly- styrono Tllormal/nslllalion. In adoition, R-Tech has excellent dimensional stability, compressive strength and water-resiS- tant propertiAS R-Tech is M Energy Star"' qualified insulation and qu~llfies for LEED po·mts:. Uses R-Tech has been used sur/'.essfully for nurnerous commer- cial. industrial and residential applications. The following are ~xamples of the many R-Tech uses. _.... Basement Walls ""' Covity Walls ..-Crawl Spaces .,... Interior Wall-s • Waterproofing Protection Board Advantilgos 'lilt Radiant-Heated Floors ...-Siding Underlayment • Stucco Underlaymcnt • Concrete Slabs .,. Wall Sheathing ..-Below Grade lnsulalion • Envtronmontal/y Friendly. R-Tach contains no dyes, may contain recycled material and the foam core is 100% recyclable. .., User Friendly R-Tech can be ordered with the lnsui- Snap TN feature which scores the product longitudinally at any pre-ordered ·Interval (commonly 16" or 24" o.c.). The lnsufSnap feature minimizes labor by enabling the installer to cleanly break the product at the desired width while also minimi~ing product breakage and waste. • Insect and Mold Resistant. R-Tech is manufactured with an ineli additive that deters termites and carpenter ants. R-Tech does not sustai11 mold and mildew growth. • Wafer-Resistant. R-Tech facers provide a surface th~t is virtually impervious to moisture. lllllt JobSita Durability. With a polymefio facer on either side ot th13; R-Tech. it is an extn~mely flexible and durable in- sulation tlllllt' StableR-Value. R-TP-ch has no thermal drift. Designers are well served knowing the R-Tech t11ermal properties will remain stable over its entire service life. R· Tech is eligible for an lnsulfoam 20-Year Thermal Performance Warranty - a warranty that's not prorated or limited to a percentage of the published R-Vafue. R-Tech® Insulation • Cost-Effective R-Tech is typically less expensive than other comparable insulation products • Provon Performance. The same fundamental chemistry has been in use since the mid~1950s, so the actual per- formance of the product is well known. • Enhanced R-Values. In certain applications, inP-reased R-Values can be obtained by plactng the metallic reflec- tive side of the R-Tech towards a dead alf space. R-Val- ue gain is depenclenl on the amount of dead air space between the R·Tech and outer surface R-Value gains are based on the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. Se€l the attached Effective R~Value chart. Sizes R-Tech is available in 4' x 8' sheets with thicknesses from 318" to 5" 1n 1/8" increments. R-Tech can also be ordered with the lnsuiSnap feature which allows the end user to cleanly break the 4' x 8' sheets into any desired width. All of the R-Tech insulation products are ~vailable with rnetallic reflective and lnsuiFoam white facers. In addition, Cllstom sizes and densi- ties are available upon request with little or no impact on lead time. Installation Recommendations Please refer to the appropriate R-Tech application sheets for recomm£~nded iMtallat1on procedures. ll'l$vlfoam LLC • 1019 P<1cificAvenue. Suite 1501 • Tacoma. WA 9R4Cl? • US.A • Phone: (253) 572-5111 • Toll Free: (800)2~8 6991i • WIWI.insultoam.cor~ 2£!.2b£b0.1_6:WOJ_oj Typical Physical Properties of R-Toch ASTM C518 .23 "' .24 ASTM C177 .26 ASTM C518 4.35 0< 4.17 ASTM C177 3.85 13 'Pr<:~pc:rtl~• Jtfe bts9d 01\ dalJt. provided by rQfoln manufftC!Uti!I'S, independ~t IQ$1 ~g~ncle~ t~uU li1.,ulfu111n. Effectivo R·Values • (mot311!c-rotlettivt! facer and depd air space) 75~ F 40" F 6.13 75' F 5.89 40' F 717 7f/ F ~.ns 40" F 8.21 75' F 7.81 40~ F 9.28 75~ F 8 78 40" F 10.30 75" F 9.74 .... 40' F 11.34 75' F 10.70 4(f ~ 12.38 75' F 11.56 40~ F 13.43 75' F 12 63 erft')etlv. R-Vii.IU&& d~!tiTilincd uslngln$1JIFo~m 1. HIIJhet den<y hl&uiFa~m productJt. will provide lli!iltlllr R-V~Iuoa. Tile typi! of coll!lh'ucticn ,.ppUc~tlon and 1114 11&p111 of tile air ipecc will alsolmp~ct tho actual Eff~tllv~ R-Value. b Roqulrea O.Ui"-3.50" do11d air 6!)ace and the R-Tttll MR raellt lcw.~~rd, thq dMd air ~f>~~c. 1;;012. 07108 52:L' 8002-v•-noN Oct. 22. 2008 9:01AM Huddleston-Berry En&mecr l u~ & TeS!in.::, LLC FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET No. 0306 P. 1 RECEIVED OCT 2 2 2008 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING PHONE NUMBER; SENDE R'S REFERENCE NYMBEII,; C.ror.u E.tJ!li£p se~s 00578 <Xol RE: :$ A' . l3a: YOUR R'I!PBRENCE N MBER : I ass LflJW-ltd.! tflementfJ.re.ek Ilaf 0 lJROBNT 0 POR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE N.EJ>LY 0 PLEAS E RECYCLE 640 WHITE AV EN UE , UNIT B·, GR AND JU NCTI ON . CO S 1 50 I P}tON E: 97 0·2 5 5·&0 05 t F AX: 9 7 0-255·6 S i 8 Oct. 22. 2008 9:01AM Crow Enterprises 3131 Open Meadows Court Grand Junction, CO 81504 Attention: Subject: Mr. Jeremy Sund I Tass Crow Construction Materials Testing 421 Battlement Creek Trail Battlement Mesa, Colorado Dear Mr. Jeremy Sund I Tass Crow, No. 0306 P. 2 August 5, 2008 Project No. 00578-000 I As requested, a representative of Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC (HBET), tested the soil compaction for the subject project on July 31, 2008. Please find enclosed the soil compaction test results are included as Records I. HBET appreciates the opportunity to offer services to Crow Enterprises. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully Submitted: Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC Jesse Lueras Project Manager e HwldlestOD-Be:ay :et.~e:& 'l't:Fiiq. Ll.C - SOIL COMPACTION TEST REPORT Task: Strucfmal. fill --------~~~=--------ProjectNo.: 0057S 0001 Tested BY" JDC Date: 7/31/08 ProjectNam~: 421 Battlemeot Creek Trail AuthorizedBy:.Client Date: 7131/08 OientName; Crow Eaterpriss; Reviewed B)" JAL Date:::8'-/1::.~:..08=-:---- Contractor Representative: Tass Crow/Crow Enterprises P1ac~eut~n~cmr. ---------------------------------------------- Test Test Location Ek:,-dun(fl)" """ ,., . Ma...Dcy""" OJJfimllllll-Dl')' DCIII!ty ....... ~ ..... ~ ...... Splfldfirationllltcm.arb No. ..... .,_ Moiid•n-e ("/.) ()d) CDllfclli<"•) Clrap •. ("A.) """" 1 north west section of pad 0.0 """""' 110.9 14.5 95.0 2.5 86 N fi<tisbod •ubg<>dc 2 south east section of pad 0.0 ....... 110.9 14.5 .92.3 2.0 83 N firushod~ 3 cente.-of pad 0.0 DB..Q6':211: 110.9 145 92.5 3.6. 83 N limshod ...... - Material Type: ______ _,na,_!i,_·v,e'--------Minimum Density: 95 Within-__1_ and+ __1_ of Optimum Moisture Content GaugeNwnber:· -"1"'8"-50"------------Density Counls: .::29.::3"'0"'.2'-----Moisture Counts: 504.2 Record No.....!..§__ ~ = = = Oct. 22. 2008 9:02AM Crow Enterprises 3131 Open Meadows Court Grand Junction, CO 81504 Attention: Subject: Mr. Jeremy Sund I Tass Crow Construction Materials Testing 421 Battlement Creek Trail Battlement Mesa, Colorado Dear Mr. Jeremy Sund I Tass Crow, No. 0306 P. 4 August 25, 2008 Project No, 00578-0001 As requested, a representative of Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC (HBET), tested the soil compaction for the subject project on August 15, 2008, observed the placement of reinforcing steel on August II, 2008. Please find enclosed the soil compaction test results are included as Record 2S, the placement of reinforcing steel observations are included as Record IR, HBET appreciates the opportunity to offer services to Crow Enterprises. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully Submitted: Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC Jesse Lueras Project Manager SOIL COMPACTION TESYREPORT Task: Structural Fill --------~~~~~------Project No.: Project Name: 00578 0001 Tes!OOBy:-=R=T=---Date: 8/5/08 Authoriud By' Client Date: 8/5/08 421 Battlement Creek Trail Client Name"' -Crow Enterprises Reviewed By· CL Date· 8/11/08 Placement Contractor: Crow Contractor Representative: Tass 0 ~ No. Test Location I Observation Area "'"'"""'",. L&bN•. Mn.D,. _o,om..,_ MWtm-e Rd•ilm:: Mom Remarks Dcltsily (pd) ;;:::~ C""""'(%) Comp.c_-.4) Spe<. Dcfltdioll: I hmping N!Y!ed I Retest for Record I, Line 2 0.() "'""" 110.9 14.5 105.0 12.9 95 y Fmished Subgrade 2 Retest for Record 1, Line 3 0.() .,....,. I 10.9 14.5 107.1 13.0 97 y Finished Subgrade 3 Retest for Reccrd I, Line I 0.0 """"' 110.9 14.5 1()6.9 12.5 96 y Ftatshed Subgrade 4 North East Section of Pad 0.0 """" !l0.9 14.5 105.5 13.0 95 y Finlshod Subgradc Compacbon/ProofEqmpment' _V:..•::h::;ra::t::o::;ry<....::Co=mp=ac=to::rc_ _____________ Remarks=---------------------------- Materiai"Jypeo Nativell'it Run Minimnm Density: _____ 9::_5"--'%'-"'-Within-_2 and + _2% <>f Optimum Moistore Content Gauge Number: _,l:o8:::5.;,0_______ Density Counts: 2995.2 Moistore Counts: 500.2 Reeord No._c-:,:--'2'-=S- = ~ = = = = ) Oct. 22. 2008 9:02AM No. 0306 P. 6 REINFORCING STEEL OBSERVATION REPORT Project No,: 00578 0001 Observed By: CL Date: 8/11/08 Project Name: 421 Battlement Creek Trail Authorized By: Client Date: 8/ll/08 Client Name: Crow Enterprises R~vlewed By: Chris Date: 8/11108 Placement Contractor: ..::C:::ro'-'w'-'E"'n::.:l.:::erp""r""is:.:•:..• ________ Contractor Representative: .::T..::as:.:•----- Location of Placement: House Foundation Observation (checked items a I ) [!] Bar Diameter [!] BarGrade [!] Bar Quantity 0 Other: 0 Imbed Placement [!] Laps and Clearances [!] Bar Clean and Free of Debris Notes/Exceptions: .!.N::!o:::n::.e..:.·--------------------------- Persons Notified: Tass ~~-------------------------------------- Corrective Action: N/A ~~---------------------------------------------- Plans/S ecifications Municipal Agency: Mesa County Building Department Plan Title: 421 Battlement Creek Trail Architect/Engineer: Grand Mesa Engineers Special Notes: Governing Code:.olB::.C::.''-'2:.:0;;.03=------- Plan Sheets: Foundation plan Plan Date: :'-N"'-/ A.:__ __ __ Project/Job Number: .:.N::.:/A_,__ ___ __ 0 Reinspection ltequlred [!) ltelnspection Not Required (CoJTective action, if any, complete.) (EJ With Notes/E)(ceptions reinforcing steel was observed to be placed at the placement locations according to the referenced plans and specifications. Building Permit Number: Record No. I R Oct. 22. 2008 9:02AM Crow Enterprises 3131 Open Meadows Court Grand Junction, CO 81504 Attention: Subject: Mr. Jeremy Sund I Tass Crow Construction Materials Testing 421 Battlement Creek Trail Battlement Mesa, Colorado Dear Mr. Jeremy Sund I Tass Crow, No. 0306 P. 7 September 8, 2008 Project No. 00578-0001 As requested, a representative of Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC (HBET), observed the placement of reinforcing steel on August 20, 2008. Please find enclosed the placement of reinforcing steel observations are included as Record 2R. HBET appreciates the opportunity to offer services to Crow Enterprises. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully Submitted: Huddleston-Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC Jesse Lueras Project Manager Oc\.22. 2008 9:03AM No. 0306 ~. 8 REINFORCING STEEL OBSERVATION REPORT Project No.: 00578 • 0001 Observed By: ;;;;D.;;;.H;;;.. =--Date: 8/20/08 Project Nallle: 421 Battlement Creek Trail Work O•·der No.: 8061 Client Name: Crow Enterprises Authorized By: Client Date: 8/20/08 Placement Contractor: _,C::.:ro::.:w:.;E:;;n::.:l:::erp;:;r:.:;is::.:•::.s ---::------Reviewed By: CL Date: 8128/08 Contractor Representative: Tass Crow Location of Placement: Basement Walls ~~~~------------------------------ Observation checked items a l !Ll Bar Diameter D Imbed Placement D Bn Grade [!] Laps and Clearances D Bar Quantity GJ Bar Cleall aud Free of l>ebris D Other: Notes/Exceptions: (2) # 4's @ top 11nd boUOm in accordance to detail A Persons Notified: Tass Crow Corrective Action: Plons/S ecilications Municipal Agency: Garfield County Building Department Plan Title: 421 Battlement Creek Trail Architect/Engineer: Grand Mesa Engineering Special Note.s: Governing Cod e:.:;IB::.C;:;2:.;0:.::0.:;.3 ____ _ Plan Sheet.!: Fmmdalion Plan Plan Date: .:.N::.:/A.:,_ __ Project/Job Number: .:.N::.:IA.:_ __ _ D Retnspection nequlred [}U Reinspection Not Required (Conective action, if any, complete.) (2U With Notes/Exceptions reinforcing steel was observed to be placed at the placement locations according to the referenced plans and specifications. Building Permit Number: Record No. 2 R ' ~ ~REPORT™ ~ ESR-1788 Issued August 1, 2005 This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www .icc-es.org Buslness.Region Ol'llc::e • 5300 WOOcman Mil Rood, wtitier, Caftanla !0l01 • (562) ~ Regional Office • 900 MontctW Road, Suite A, Bi'Tni1!jlarn, Alabama 35213 • (205) ~9800 Regional Office • 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Colntry CUl Hils, Illinois 60478 • (708) 799-2305 DIVISION : 07-THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION Section: 07210-Bullding Insulation Section: 07280-Water-resistive Barrier REPORT HOLDER: PREMIER INDUSTRIES, INCJdba INSULFOAM 1019 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 1501 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 (800) 248·5995 www.premierindustries.com EVALUATION SUBJECT: INSULFOAM EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE (EPS) AND R- TECHTM INSULATION BOARDS 1.0 EVALUATION SCOPE Compliance with the following codes: • 2003 International Building Co de$ (IBC) • 2003 International Residential Code~ (IRC) • 1997 Uniform Building Code™ (UBC) Properties evaluated: • Surface-burning characteristics • Attic and crawl space installation • Thermal performance • Water-resistive barrier 2 .0 USES lnsulfoam Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) and R-TECHTM insulation boards are EPS foam plastic boards used as nonstructural thermal insulation in wall cavities or ceiling assemblies, door cavities, roofs, or foundations, or on the outside faces of exterior walls of Type V-B (IBC) or Type V-N (UBC) construction, or structures constructed in accordance with the IRC. The insulation boards may be used on walls in attics and crawl spaces with no covering applied to the attic or crawl space side of the foam plast ic, when the boards are installed in accordance with Section 4 .2 . The R-TECH boards may be used as an alternative to th e water-resistive barriers specified in the IBC,IRC and UBC, when installed as set forth in Section 4.3. 3.0 DESCRIPTION 3 .1 EPS Board: EPS board is available with flat faces and square edges in various lengths and widths and in th icknesses up to 6 inches (152 mm). The foam plastic boards are Type I, II, VIII or IX boards complying with ASTM C 578, and having densities and thermal resistance values as shown in Table 1. The foam plastic boards have a flame-spread index not exceeding 75 and a smoke-developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in a ccordance with ASTM E 84 (UBC Standard 8 -1 ). 3.2 EIFS Grade (lEG) EPS Board: lEG board is available with flat faces and square edges in various lengths and widths and in thicknesses up to 4 inches (102 mm). The foam plastic board is a Type I board complying with ASTM C 578. The board has a minimum density of 0 .90 pcf (14.4 kg/m3) and is used as a component of exterior insulation and finish systems (EIFS). The foam plastic board has a flame-spread index not exceeding 75 and a smoke-developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84 (UBC Standard 8-1). The foam plastic lEG board has more restrictive requirements than the EPS board for conditioning, product dimensions, marking and packaging. 3.3 R-TECHT"' Board: R-TECH™ board is available with flat faces and square edges in various lengths and widths, and in thicknesses up to 5 inches (127 mm). The foam plastic boards are Type I, II, VIII or IX boards complying with ASTM C 578. The boards have densities and thermal resistance values as shown in Table 1. The foam plastic board s consist of an EPS core with the faces laminated with polyethylene and polypropylene films . The foam plastic boards are manufactured in a fanfold or standard configuration. An optional reflect ive metalized film facer is also available . The foam plastic boards have a flame- spread index not exceeding 75 and a smoke-developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84 (UBC Standard 8-1 ). 3.4 R-TECHTM One-Coat Stucco Board: R-TECHTM One-Coat Stucco Boards are available with flat faces or with nominally 1/2-inch-wide-by-1/4-inch-deep (12. 7 by 6 .35 mm) channels spaced a maximum of 12 inches (305 mm) on center on the back face of the board, with nominally 1.5-mil-thick (0.38 mm) plastic facers laminated to both sides of the board. The boards are produced in a 1-inch (25.4 mm) thickness and in the following configurations: • Two or4 feet wide by 8 feet long (610 or 1219 mm by 2438 mm) with either 1/2-by-1/2-inch (12 .7 by 12.7 mm) shiplap joints or tongue-and-groove joints on the long edges • Forty-nine inches wide by 8 to 10 feet long (1245 mm by 2438 to 3048 mm) with shiplap joints on the long edges • Four feet wide by 8 to 10 feet long (1219 mm by 2438 to 3048 mm) with square edges See Figure 2 for add itional detail s on the board edges. The foam plastic boards are Type I boards, complying with ASTM C 578 , and have a nominal density of 1 pcf (16 kg/m3). The foam plastic boards have a flame-spread index not e xceed ing f-.¢ REPORTS '" ar e no/to be construed as representing aesthe tics or any other attributes not specifically add ressed, n or are they t o be construed as an <llD endorsemelll of the subject of the report or a recommendation for its use. There is no Kr:trranty by ICC Evaluation &rvice, Inc., express or implied, as to any 1 finding or o ther mal/er in this report, or as to any product covered by the report. Copyright © 2005 Page1 of9 Page 2 of 9 75 and a smoke-developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84 (UBC Standard 8·1). 3.5 R·TECH"' Gable-Guard: R-TECH"' Gable-Guard board is available with flatfaces and square edges in 4-foot (1219 mm) widths and 8-foot (2438 mm), 10-foot (3048 mm)and 12-foot (3658 mm) lengths, and with a nominal thickness of '1, inch (12.7 mm). The foam plastic boards are Type I boards complying with ASTM C 578. The boards have a nominal density of 1 pel (16 kglm3) and a nominal 1.5-mil (0.38 mm) polymeric facer laminated to both sides of the board, and a thermal resistance value as shown in Table 1. The foam plastic boards have a flame-spread index not exceeding 75 and a smoke-developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84 (UBC Standard 8·1 ). 3.6 Poly-Guard 136 Tape: Poly-Guard 136 tape shall be used with the R-TECH"" One- Coat Stucco Board when the board is used as an alternative water-resistive barrier as described in Section 4.3. The tape consists of a polyethylene backing with a rubber-based adhesive, and has a nominal thickness of9.0 mils (0.23 mm) and a width of 2 inches (51 mm). The tape is supplied in 36- yard (32 918 mm) rolls. 4.0 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION 4.1 General: Installation of lnsulfoam EPS"' and R·TECH"" insulation boards shall comply with this report and the manufacturer's published installation instructions. The manufacturer's published installation instructions shall be available at the jobsite at all times during installation. Except as described in Section 4.2, the interior of the building shall be separated from the insulation boards with an approved thermal barrier as required by IBC Section 2603.4, IRC Section R314 or UBC Section 2602.4. The use of the insulation boards in areas of "very heavy" termite infestation probability shall comply with IRC Section R320.4 when boards are used in structures regulated by the IRC. A vapor retarder shall be installed, in accordance with IBC Section 1403.3 or IRC Section R318, as applicable. A vapor barrier may be required by the code official for installations in jurisdictions adopting the UBC. The insulation board may be applied to exterior faces of walls to a maximum thickness of 1'1, inches (38 mm), except insulation board thicknesses greater than 1112 inches (38 mm) may be permitted if such installation is recognized in a current ICC-ES evaluation report on a wall covering. The attachment of finish materials over the insulation board shall allow for a minimum 1-inch (25.4 mm) penetration of the fasteners into wood framing. Sheathing or a wall covering over the insulation shall be structurally adequate to resist horizontal forces perpendicular to the wall. All walls shall be braced in accordance with IBC Section 2308.9.3, IRC Section R602.10.3, or UBC Section 2320.11.3 or 2320.11.4, as applicable. Insulation boards shall not be used as a nailing base for exterior siding materials. All nailing shall be made through the insulation into the wall framing or structural sheathing as required by the siding manufacturer's instructions or the applicable code. Use of insulation boards as roof insulation shall be limited to installations recognized in a current ICC-ES evaluation report for the roof covering system. 4.2 Special Uses: lnsulfoam EPS"" orR-TECH"" insulation boards may be used on walls of crawl spaces and attics without a thermal ESR-1788 barrier being applied to the interior side of the foam plastic, provided all of the following conditions are met: a. Entry to the crawl space is only to service utilities, and heat-producing appliances are not permitted. b. There are no interconnected basement areas. c. Air in the crawl space is not circulated to other parts of the building. d. Attic ventilation is provided that complies with IBC Section 1203.2, IRC Section R806 or UBC Section 1505; and combustion air complying with Sections 701 and 703.1 of the 19971CBO Unifotm Mechanical Code or Sections 701 and 703.1 of the 20031ntemational Mechanical Code•, is provided, as applicable. Under-floor ventilation is provided that complies with IBC Section 1203.3, IRC Section R408.1 or UBC Section 2306.7, as applicable. e. EPS boards having a maximum nominal density of 1 pel (16 kg/m3 ) are permitted to be a maximum of 3 inches (76 mm)thick, and boards having a maximum nominal density of 2 pel (32 kg/m3 ) are permitted to be a maximum of 2 inches (51 mm) thick. f. R· TECH"" boards having a maximum nominal density of 1.0 pcf (16 kg/m3 ) are permitted to be a maximum of 1 inch thick (25.4 mm). 4.3 Water-resistive Barrier: 4.3.1 General: When installed in accordance with this section, the R· TECH"' One-Coat Stucco Boards may be used as an alternative to Type I felt complying with ASTM D 226 or, Grade A, B or C building paper as specified in UBC Standard 14-1. The boards shall be covered with exterior plaster complying with IBC Section 2512, IRC Section R703.6, or UBC Section 2508, or with one ofthe cementitious exterior wall coatings noted in Section 4.4 of this report. The 2· or 4-foot-wide (61 0 and 1219 mm) R· TECH"' boards with tongue-and-groove joints on the long edges shall be oriented horizontally, with the tongues facing upward. The 2· or4-foot-wide (610 and 1219 mm) boards with shiplap joints, and the 48· or 49-inch-wide (1219 mm and 1245 mm) boards with square edges, shall be oriented vertically. Shiplap joints shall occur over framing and shall overlap a minimum of 1/2 inch (12.7 mm). The R·TECH"' One-Coat Stucco Boards shall be installed directly to framing and fastened to exterior framing spaced a maximum of 24 inches (610 mm) on center, except where further limited by the requirements for the wall covering. Fasteners used to attach the boards to framing shall be minimum 6d ring-shank nails and 15/16-inch-diameter (23.8 mm) plastic washers, or equivalent, spaced at 12 inches (305 mm) on center, or 1-inch-wide-crown (25.4 mm), 1314-inch· long (45 mm), No. 16 gage staples spaced at 6 inches (152 mm) on center. Joints between boards, and corners created with the board, shall be taped with Poly-Guard 136 polyethylene tape centered over the joint. R-TECH"" One Coat Stucco Boards shall be installed with a weep screed. See Figure 3 for installation details. R· TECH"' One Coat Stucco Board used as a water-resistive barrier requires the use of self-adhering flashing, complying with the ICC·ES Acceptance Criteria for Flashing Materials (AC148), around penetrations as shown in Figure 4. For exterior plaster complying with IBC Section 2512, IRC Section R703.6 or UBC Section 2508, the length of the fasteners used to attach the lath shall be proportionally increased based on the thickness of the R· TECH,.. One Coat Stucco Board. The increase in fastener length is to maintain penetration into framing that is equivalent to that of fasteners attaching the lath without insulation. Page 3 of 9 4.3.2 Penetrations : Flashing of fl ang e-type window penetrations when R-TECHTM One Co at Stucco Board is used as a water-resistive barrier shall be accompanied by installation of flashing complying with AC148, completely covering the framing sill and extending a minimum of 6 inches (51 mm) up the sides of the opening and approximately 11/2 inches (38 mm) beyond the face of the foam board at the front of the window opening. The flashing shall be flush with the inside edge of the framing membe rs on th e in side of the wall . The flashing extending outside of the R-TECH"" One Coat Stucco Board s hall be folded over the front face of the foam board. The flashing material shall then be cut over the ch a nnels in the foam board and gently pushed down into the channels to allow for drainage. See Figure 4 for details. Flashing of pipe penetrations shall be accomplished by sealing around the pipe with flashing complying with AC148. Flashing of other penetrating items shall be in accordance with the wall covering manufacturer's published installation instructions. 4.4 Cementitlous Exterior Wall Coatings: R-TECH"" One Coat Stucco Board and R-TECHtu Gable- Gard may be used with cementitious exterior wall coatings when installed in a ccordance with this section (Section 4.4). When used with a cementitious exterior wall coating recognized in an ICC-ES evaluation report, the R-TECH"" One Coat Stucco Boards are an alternative to 1-inch-thick (25.4 mm), 1.5 pet density (24 kg/m3 ), EPS foam plastic insulation specified in the ICC-ES evaluation report on the coating . When installed in accordance with Section 4.3 of t his report, the R-TECH"" One-Coat Stucco Boards may be used as an alternative to Type I felt complying with ASTM D 226 or Grade A , B or C building paper as specified in UBC Standard 14-1 . R-TECH"" One Coat Stucco Boards used in conjunction with stucco systems where the R-TECH"" One Coat Stucco Board is not the water-resistive barrier, are not required to be taped . When used with ICC-ES-recognized cementitious exterior wall coating s, the R-TECH"" Gable-Guard installed on attic wall framing is an alternative to 1-inch-thick (25.4 mm), 1.5 pet density (24 kg/m3 ), EPS foam plastic insulation specified in the ICC-ES e valuation report on the coating. The R- TECH"" Gable-Guard shall be installed , with a water-resistive barrier, directly to open framing with blocked in·sulation board joints, or shall be installed over solid sheath ing. Conditions in the evaluation report for the foam plasti c insulation as part of the coating system, such as orientation, tongue-and-groove edges, square edges and taping , shall b e observed . Acceptable coating manufacturers and the ir respective evaluation reports are as follows: El Rey Stucco Company, Inc. lncide Technologies, Inc. E-Z Wall Pre-Mix Co., Inc. Highland Products, Inc. Magna Wall, Inc. Omega Produ cts International, Inc. The QUIKRETE Companies San-Kote, Inc. American Building and Cement Products Superwall Manufacturing, Inc . UltraKote Products, Inc. Western Stucco Products, Co., Inc. ER-5129 ER-4327 ER-5146 ER-3878 ER-4776 ESR-1194 ER-4441 ER-5144 ER-4988 ER-4867 ESR-1471 ER-3899 ESR-1788 Page4of9 6.5 Report containing results of testing performed in accordance with ASTM C 578. 6.6 Report containing results of comparative crawl space fire tests. 6. 7 Report containing results of testing performed in accordance with UL 1715 (UBC Standard 26-3). 6.8 A quality control manual. 7.0 IDENTIFICATION The insulation board packaging shall bear a label with the lnsulfoam name; the manufacturing facility location; the date ESR-1788 of manufacture; the evaluation report number (ESR-1788); the density; the name of the inspection agency (Underwriters Laboratories Inc.); the flame-spread index (75 or less); and the smoke-developed index (450 or less). The Poly-Guard 136 polyethylene tape is identified with the product name and in accordance with the requirements of evaluation report ESR-1788. TABLE 1-DENSITIES AND R-VALUES FOR BOARDS EPSTYPE NOMINAL DENSITY MINIMUM DENSITY MINIMUM R-VALUE FOR (pel) (pel) 1~NCH THICKNESS AT 75'F (11'-hr-'F/Biu) I 1 0.9 3.6 VIII 1.25 1.15 3.6 II 1.5 1.35 4 IX 2 1.6 4.2 --' -' For 51: 1mch-25.4 mm. 1 pel -16.016 kg/m, 1 fl'-hr-F/Btu-0.176 m -KIW. TABLE 2-MANUFACTURING LOCATIONS LOCATIONS OF PREMIER INDUSTRIES, INC./dba INSULFOAM LOCATION NUMBERS FOR PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION lnsulfoam 628 Western Drive 1-62 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 lnsulfoam 3401 West Cocopah Street 1-65 Phoenix, Arizona 85009 lnsulfoam 5635 Schaefer Avenue 1-64 Chino, California 91710 lnsulfoam 1155 Business Park Dr., Bldg. A 1-63 Dixon, California 95620 lnsulfoam 12601 East 33ro Avenue-Unit 114 1-42 Aurora, Colorado 80011 lnsulfoam RR1 Box 101 1-41 Mead, Nebraska 68041 lnsulfoam 4500 South Frontage Road 1-46 Lakeland, Florida 33815 lnsulfoam 1620 South 4370 W 1-43 Salt lake City, Utah 64104 lnsu\foam 19041 80 111 Avenue South 1-61 South Kent, Washington 98032 lnsulfoam 4849 Groveport Road 1-44 Columbus, Ohio 43207 lnsulfoam 109 Service Road 1-49 Anderson, South Carolina 29625 Page 5 of9 PII'SQAAGENCY LONG EDGE OF BQARQ LONG EDGE OF TYPE lEG LONG EDGE OF BOARDS FOR ATTICS OR CRAWb SPACES Pll• PREMER INDUSTRIES INC. I: INSULFOAM -·. SHORT EDGE OF BOARD SEE CERT Pll-1 _ .... -/~ ....... --~ ~-. LONG EDGE OF BOARD '" ESR-111:111 ,., PLANT IDErHIFICATiot' NUIVBERt tSEE TABU! 2) Pll EVALUATION REPORT NUIVIIER .---~ ~~ _,...... ·-----LONG EDGE OF BOARD [---------···------·------·------ lEG Pll 161 ESR·178:8 ____ ....---~---· ----~ LONG EDGE OF BOARD 4-'" ::..~--~~- MANUFAC1\IRED FROM BASF STYROPOR IL OR BI'L, OR NOVA DVLITE M/7 OR M33 EPS FIGURE 1-ARKINGS ESR-1788 Page 6 of9 / J, 112" x 1/4" Channtll 12" o,c. ma~t.. S!uj \~~ SHpop Jo'•t \ ~;I"POLY·GUARO POLYETHYLENE TAPE R·Teth One-Coat Stucw Board 49~ ;>< 96" Vertical or49~x 1os•vertical Shiplap Joint Tong\le and Groove Sill Flashing kllr."TI FIGURE 2-R-TECH EDGE DETAILS -R-Tech One Coat Stucco Board 'lfre ~ oHt · One Coot \~Stucco \__ 1-3/B" "J~ -~~ Weep Screed " I I Anchor So.t 1 ~ Concrele Slob j~ ocrootng FIGURE l-INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR R-TECH ONE COAT STUCCO BOARD INSULATION USED />S A WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER ESR-1788 Page 7 of9 Wood or melol studs -----------..,..A,P w/sl'liplop edge tapo QVer Insulation fasteners 1' oc Sili ptote with bolts os req'd Conc~te -::--::--:--:--:--------k'lj 4' Wide Vertical Sheela _ ... Wood or metal studs -------~L R-Tec;hOne-<:oatS""'~- Boafd 2K8 or .fx8 T&G Butt joint over ------stud. covered with PotrGuard 136 -... Jnsulotion fasteners 1' oc R· Tech Horizontal Pieces _ ... One coot stucco loth Weep Screed . ,. .. FIGURE 3-INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR R-TECH ONE COAT STUCCO BOARD INSULATION USED AS A WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER (Continued) ESR-1788 Page 8 of9 H I I ' 1 ESR-1788 Typical Window Flashing Detail 1: 1:. - ',_,-.. _ STEP 1 LINTEl Window Roughed-In Opemng t"MJN, ----...,. - STEP 3 .. .. "' ~ 8 q ~ -• _co ~ --.. I -.. 1--~ -.. I .. ~ ! .. - ----- El i ' I STEP 4 ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .., .. -.., • TOP VIEW APPROVED FLASHING TAPE Application of approved Hashing tape over window sill and R-TECH Total Watl drainage channels. Cut tape over drainage channel openings and fold cut tape into channel. Fold tape over face of board. STEP2 - ~:;:~~t~~t~;~:f.~~~?i STEP 5 r l .. c .. .. 8 ~ --~ I I I t~ ~-·j l .. ~ .. - - f ' ' .. I '-' ' ' .. -.. .. .. .,.------ FIGURE 4-INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR R-TECH ONE.COAT STUCCO BOARD INSULATION USED AS A WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER Page 9 of 9 Typical Window Flashing AC 148 complying flashing Window attached through flange into Header R-TECH One-coat Stuccoboard R-TECH One-coat Stucco board AC 148 complying t lashing Window anached through flange i nlo 2 x stud Window attached through flange into 2 x stud AC 148 complying flashing Header Detail Jamb Detail • R-TECHTotaiWall ------------If )--------'""" >< ?< \.~ ' •!.., \'l "g 't. .f) FIGURE 4-INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR R·TECH ONE-COAT STUCCO BOARD INSULATION USED AS A WEATHER-RESISTIVE BARRIER (Continued) ESR-1788 COUNTY OF GAKFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at _iL. ""'Z"-I--"'~""""~"""'-~=""'-"'-hd-=:..=.-'7i-='A-=.o..• __ Permit No. 1/0 2-2-- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: f)/!h,1 -t--:tt ~vJdo -Jj::;;;::f:;f:!Efz~~ ~)~al~~ )!(call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date \ -{,a 20 £(j__ Building Inspector __ _.J(~J~&jl!Uj~-hli;-.Ll-"'~'-"'~l=------- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at _L/~U'----'brt"""""'ff14----=t,_J_==..,~r:::::>A.=-·'------ Permit No. J/0 k-"2-- 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /.' 1-f'J 20 1!0 --LL./-'-f~'------7ft'\---.--A--J?~•u !!Q__/J _ Building Inspector __ ,tjJ{,,..,Jt..,·>tu.rJ.t-"..Mt:._'-~~~-"""-------- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945-8212 Job located at __________________________________ __ Permit No. ______________________________________ _ <?F(-/-ULif7"r~~}urrf ~ 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected 11) ad -a;-or;d'..#t~~~--0'&-~ When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ;ft; 6aif/emeJ-flu)_ L J Permit No. ----+-'-/)__,V"-'22-=------------ 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date I~~ 'l_;( ctr -<-:1 20 vZ: Building Inspector lf.i:t{kfj)ll--'4,'---:J~['r----- Phone (970) 945-8212 N 11022 o. ----------~~~-----Assessor's Parcel No. 2407-053-040-06 Date 711712008 BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address ____ _:4!!2'-.!1c..!B~a~tt~l~m~e!!.n!!!.t..!:C~r£ee!<2k!!...!.T!..:r.2P_'c~h~u~t~e-=-~B~t,_,lm ..... t,_C!o!,!..,r.__,Vuiull...,s,..e,.c .... 1 ____________________ __ Owner _____ ___:S::..:o:c:rc::e.:..:n:::se.:.:n:.:;,,_,J::.oo:..:.ry.z._ ______ Ad~ress 7485 CR 233 Silt Contractor _____ T-'a-'s-'-s_C_r-'o-'-w'----------Address 3131 Open meadows Phone # 970~948-0647 Phone # 970-712-1880 Setbacks: Front ______ Rear _______ RH _____ LH ______ Zoning ____ _ slf on crwsp wl open patio & att. Garage INSPECTIONS Soils Test Weatherproofing _____________ _ Footing .£1.11 c., • ~~"" Mechanical tJq;: *Foundation O v·r-v (\ ""~ ;p: QJl Electrical Rough (State) I 0-"Z't.-og --t- Grout ~ Electrical Final (State) --o Underground Plumbing Final /-9~ O'l/Checklist ComRieted?--r~=-<-- Rough Plumqing . f()*o'6J0di Certificate Occupancy# ( Q i53 . Framing II"' tl/-o8lEii.L Date 1 ~El A+=~TJ \.. v·-<-_..'f~f-l Insulation Septic System# ________________ _ Roofing Date-------------- Drywall 1\-(~~~FJM Final ___________ _ G .. asPiping ff-tcf~AJiiL Othe~r ~,. • A/7 -,q .-, . _. · t-r-NOTES -t-. V1C. j~J£;..~'-0 /L-.5 -C8 ~'lt-tf kl !f-tt«v a:/ t'70Y( . ~ .t---#/1 I P-1.11 -~. ; ~ .~-fptz:y ~14-~ 1114hU.-t?G //{.4 } · ~ ~«£ (continue on back) BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNlESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB Date Issued l /IJI DB Permit No._LI/J~D~2c=2::____ __ _ AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. UseSJf dwtUirJS on craw\~£, W/ttrn {n\io ~ a-H-.cpnge Address or Legal Description I.J'l.l ftl:\+\eyrtrd-Crtf.t. l r, 'Rimtrutfl ownerfi>~~~}DYrlti ContractoCrbW ~i8'S Building Permit Type~ -'\d~a J This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection INSPECTION RECORD Footing I Driveway --- Foundation I Grouting Insulation ;/-l7~P8A:hVI '" J /( Underground Plumbing Drywall l)-d.,5-o"6 i6Jtvl Rough Plumbing \l-14-1lt~ ~~ Electric Final (by State lns~ector).f~ 11M-~ ]O-t\-D'b ~ 01'-T6 OCYof1 1'-IW>< J TO S'fS fJ:'d;t!"-.» ....,..,vt..-~l<lFf'~ R:i~ pu-o~--lb't---71~7-oPI ~ ~ ~~ ) • I (PriortoFinal) 1 ·;:, nk' :_y.z:-7 0 d-y Rough Mechanical a Septic Final Jl-d-~Y>·~ Gas Piping JHI-o8/Jw.. FINAL l-t?-c1 ~u} Electric Rough (by State ln~JO-2 2-0~ (You Must Call For Final Inspection) ! ~ . ~1 __ Notes {Prior to Framing) ...._: Framing 1 1 -fL!.os/JrYI [to include Roof in place & Windows & Doors installed & Firestopping in place) THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspection Call970-384-5003 Office 970·945-8212 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD By£ hrn:o.nJ.d 1J C)"l~S' ,.. PROTECT PERMi~M WEATHER DAMAGE . (DO NOT LAMINATE) ~ Parcel Detail Page I of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/TL~:l~llrer_ Pro pert)! SeNch I Assessor Subset QueQ' I Assessor SakLS_ellJ!:h Clerk_& Recorder Re~tion Search Basic Building_Char(lj;Je_ris1ics I TaxJnformation !'arcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Det<i_iJ I R~siden1ial/Co_nunercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photogmp_hs I Mi!LLe_yy_Revenues D~ail I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I 080 II R490352 II 240705304006 II 38.002 I Owner Name and Mailing Address I sORENSEN, JORY & AUTUMN 17485 COUNTY ROAD 233 lsiLT, co 81652 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) ISECT,TWN,RNG:5-7-95 SUB:BATTLEMENT !cREEK VILLAGE SEC I BLK:4 LOT:6 IPRE:R270227 SUC:R490236 AND/THRU:T ITO:R490379 BK:0601 PG:0658 IRECPT:745412 BK:I071 PG:0602 IBK:0885 PG:0566 BK:0769 PG:0518 Location Physical Address: IIBMI Subdivision: I BATTLEMENT CREEK VILLAGE SEC I Land Acres: llo.57 Land Sq Ft: I 0 Section II Township II Range II II http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParceiNumber=240705304006 I I I I I I 6/20/2008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 [I 5 7 II 95 I[ 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: 68,oooll 19,7201 I Improvements: oil 0 I Total: 68,oooll 19,7201 Additional Value Detail Most Recent Sale Sale Date: 113/25/2008 Sale Price: 1189,900 Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Tn~e II Amount I 2007 I Tax Payment: Second Half II ($374.70)1 2007 Tax Payment: First Half II ($374.70)1 2007 Tax Amount $749.401 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($866.20)1 2006 I Tax Amount $866.201 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,126.02)1 2005 Tax Amount $1,126.021 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,299.12)1 2004 Tax Amount $1,299.121 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,384.54)1 2003 II Tax Amount $1,384.541 II II http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=240705304006 6/20/2008 Parcel Detail II 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole ($969.68)1 2002 II Tax Amount $969.681 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($952.24)1 2001 Tax Amount $952.241 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($856.80)1 I 2000 I Tax Amount $856.801 I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole I ($692.54)1 I 1999 II Tax Amount II $692.541 Mill LeY)' Revenues Detail '[op_Qf_page Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database~_Se.ar.chi)pili>_n_s Clerk & Recorder Database Search __ Qptions Oariield County HQ!ne I'age Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Q.ood_T_yms_S..Qft_w_are. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=240705304006 6/20/2008