Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No: ---=2=395-014-28-082 Locality: lronbridge PUD, Ph. II, Flg,J~,3, Lot 82 Job Address: 416 River Bank Ln. GWS -------------- Use of Building: ___ s_/f dwelling on crawl space w/ patio & att. Garage Owner: ------~--Embrey, Gayle __ _ Contractor: Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,206,~ Septic: ---~.~ Bldg Permit: $ 1,856.15 RFTA Total Fees: $ 3,812.6~ 750.00 Clerk: __ -.ill(l\or Date: :1~~ I GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garfield~countv com ~· This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authori;~;ed agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner. must be provided with this Application. legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Otbtr Pt:rmig, Multiple separate permit:; may be required: (I) State Electrical Permit, (2) County JSDS Permit. (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement, CERTIFICATION [ hereby certify that l have read this Application and that the information ~ontained above is true an~ con:cct I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf(submlttals), based upon my certtficauon as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application. a Building Pennit will be issued granting permission to me, as Ow1ler, to construct the structu.re(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Departmenl. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, JSDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, ifthe location, construction or use of the strocture(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. 1 hereby grant pennission to the Bu1lding Department to cote: the prope~, de~cribed a_bove, to in spec: the work. i further ~cknowledge .that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (I) requiring the correction of errors m the submittals, 1f any, d1seovered after 1ssuanee; or (2) stoppUlg consrrucnon or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation ofCoWlty Regu!ation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents. including wilhout I I AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: STAFF USE ONLY Plan Check Manu home Fee: = -Dt> The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. 1 understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE Bapplicationdecember2007 DATE VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ..:E;:cm:::b::,r=,.ey,__:::--:-:---------Subdivision 416 River Bank Lane Lot/Block -:6'-".1~0:':.0"'8;.=:-==="'--------Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valnation 2815 sf sf sf sf X $74.68 2815 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 648 sf X $18.00 2815 sf X $9.00 sf X $24.00 492 sf X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X lronbridge phase 2 82 210,224.20 0.00 11,664.00 25,335.00 5,904.00 0.00 253,127.20 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes_..-!'-- 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes r· 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Y es._--L-"--- 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes. __ _t..:.'---- 2 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply 11 / iA/ with the lRC? f'/, lK Yes No >L-, 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes._-"'---- 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes 7', 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes .?"---· No ______ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on 0 the plan? · Yes_~-:..7"_·. __ _ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel ofland created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes_-L~-- 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes :;-1-.. 22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes :?'---No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes /'--. 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes ?< 4 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 I. See phone book for other agencies Yes ,z 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes :/--- 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? / &, 1 • C: Yes No._____ c..<Y-· '1::' t<>---'--€--c.>'-- 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes r No ----- 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 7'- I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes -1---.. 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes r--. 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes )'( 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes. __ _£_"--- 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes r No ______ _ 3 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes'--"--- 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes 7-· 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes T 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes .x. 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes .><... 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes 7-· No. _____ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes_~"---- 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes 1- 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes ..,::.__ 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes. ________ k_~------- 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ?"'-- 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes >L- 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes ~-· I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of myu~ s-/7-08 si!(£t\lre0fowner Date Phone: 9?6 tJ/3 1/f/8' (days); Project Name: ::{for'bdtfy.-tf'Z.- 9 70 '1 1ftd 6?-! ( £ /Vl .hr€A-f les.'JJ. 6 (evenings) Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqDec2007 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant 'f£M4 ~../ /Building _t./_ PEn"gineered Foundation tf~;JYeway Permit _~_S\ar,r··-eyed Site Plan ~-~. JHo>Uv\, Mseptic Permit and Setbacks ~ e/Topography 30% zh Residential Plan Review List ~nimum Application Questionnaire ~bdivision Plat Notes -- ~e Department Review ~ion Determination/Fees _Red~ Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~ch Conditions ~ation Signed ~·-To Sign Applkmoo Parcel/Schedule No . .i:1J._ 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms. ~oils Report GENERAL NOTES: Date fa-(D -\;)~ Planning/Zoning ~operty Line Setbacks ~ft Stream Setbac~c:.q-lu::>( ?"""t' ~Plain/ ~ding Height ~gSign-off ~Impact Fees~~ ALA._HOA/DRC Approval -~Topography 40% ..4#J?lanning Issues ~ivision Plat Notes · Gayle Embrey 414 Elk Circle Basalt, CO 81621 May 13,2008 Garfield County Building and Planning Department; Sirs, let this letter serve as authorization for Rick Koehler, and Northway Construction, to serve as my agent in dealing with all permit and planning requirements with your office. Thank you ~~~/- Gayle Embrey No. ___________ 1L1u0~3~8 __ ___ Assessor's Parcel No. 2395-014-2$-082 Date 4/23/2008 BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address ----~4~16~Rwivuear~B~awn~k~L~awn~e.~G~VVD··~sL-~(I~ro~sw•b~r~jd~g~ewP~UwP~P~h~2~,fwiQ~14,2~&~3~,~l~oat~8-2)~---------------- 0wner Embrey, Gayle Address 414 Elk Circle. Basalt Phone # 927-5455 Contractor.:_· -------"'N~o::!..!rt:!..!li~w~a!Jly~C~o~n~s~tr~u~ct!:!:io~n!.!._ ___ Address 981 cowen Dr, Carbondal.,hone # 948-0211-rick Setbacks: Front _________ Rear ______ RH _________ LH _________ Zoning _______ __ s/f dwelling on crawl space w/patio li llttached garage Soils Test -:--------------------,-- INSPECTIONS ::J CJ<j"-39' # FoQting liP,~7-t;89J?e-~0 lt.. Foundation/a-5 £-:.>--ot5 :>@? Grout _______________________ ___ Underground Plumbing-:----::;:----=----- Rough Plumbing 1;.-z.l-09 ->!4£ C~. 'f'Lt) Framing ~ --z4· ~(5) 9 SZ:..«-.1 Insulation ~-//:_ 0 ?~&.;?. Roofing----------------------- Drywall ------c;;:----=-.,---:-;;,----:--,---- Gas Piping _4-,_·_·-~2=<--l--_~'_v9,_· ~"flA""'·""'~""'-_;_· __ MT1/ ~ 8-11?? cp:c.v; Weatherproofing ___________________ _ Mechanicai _________ -;;--=------==-,------- Eiectri cal Rough (State) --::-:*--.,..,.-'--,.,-'7'"7''--<f-H'-- Eiectric I Fnal State>--~----===--=-+--_.t..a...,.q...,.,.,- . Final · · /Checklist C NOTES Certificate Occupancy # --="""""'"""""----,...,--.,.--,--..,....... Date 5 Septic System # --l:..l..!.(t,I(.,,C..i'..I(J~LL.!<:.!.:f---------­ Date ----------,-":;' .... ----------Final ___________________ _ Other ------------------------------ (continue on back) BUILDING PER GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO INSPECTION Will NOT BE: f\.lliADE UNlESS THIS CARD IS POSTED Ot~ THE JOB Date Issued ].-j..~-{)t,____ __ PermitNo.__,_,l\'---"'-0'38~--- AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully Complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. use $lf dwe\\i~ ()n cvn.W\~ce ~ ptdio ...-oM=__.. ~~trt ..... ~'le""----- AddressorLegaiDescription 1.\\\t tiVU &r\k. \...n. . GW'S owner ZmbrU~-t£UA~\& ___ contractor~!Aij ~t. Building PermitTy:Wdeilii41~------------------------- This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway lrhJ.7'-, ' tfr/'e/«?1:' ~ Foundation I Grouting /C-3&-CJS f/.Lk! Insulation Cr/1-o'T '}Zfil Underground Plumbing Drywall {,~ ?.t/JV9 "l;J/Z Rough Plumbing 01< I r C'o 77oA,!5· fi'7.A p;r; FZI-C> 7' ?"tV Electric Final (by State Inspector) (Prior to Final) '& . '!:>-D'J t:F Rough Mechanical G-//-o7' fZtV Septic Final ---/l?t-- Gas Piping 4-·-2 I 0'1 FINAL q,./3-?ff ftjNl Electric Ro,.gh (by State Inspector) 4--7-6'7' (You Must Cal! For Final Inspection) {Prior to Framing) _,_ Notes £A 17/ .s=s-o9 c;zw Framing h--z 'f -o :>:: _'f"'c.-v, ?;C/JO;fi)& £<-tr:C, ;/lb"f? (to include Roof in place & Windows & Doors Installed & Flrestopplng in place) APPROVED Date THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspection Call 970-384-5003 Office 97()-945-8212. 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD u +-~~K By 1::.. nnroo ' :n tl-1\or PROTECT PER~ WEATHER DJfMAGE (DO NOT LAMINATE) COUNTY OF GARFIELD ·BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 1:/G X 11/tC I( QAd;<_ Permit No. _ _1.._/ /.~tfJ___,:?;::::__::g"'------~----- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Building Inspector ~-~~t2__{d.~~~~~,.,_-__ Phone (970) 945-821 COUNTY OF GARFIELD • BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at -f-,1:--t-/_,{;=---+.&-"-'/'--'I/'-L;=C,-'---j(=---'--lh--'--W__,_,_,/V'-'-K-"'1 ~- Permit No. (/d S 2 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 4-----7/ 20 C5z Building Inspector--------------- Phone (970) 945-8212 Aug 13 2009 3:00PM Northwa~ Construction 970 963 4419 OS-05-09;10:22 ;AVALANCHE 19709634419 -............. _,.. ....... 0 ........ __ ...... .. Division of Registrations Electrlc:el and Plumbing Permits Online View Inspection for Permit 673266 • lndlca!N l'lequimd FIGid Inspect lOll Permit 11: 6732118 trospeclad Date: 08103/2009 Permit Holder. AVALANCHf. CREEK ENTERPRISES l.LC Slta Adclr....,: 416 River Bank Ln Cily: GlanwoDd SJYing~ Stole: co Zip: 81601 tnspeo:tion Type: Final $tal\lo1Action: Acceple<! Relnspadlon Fee Paid S: Commente: COITIIIlllons: Inspector's Name: RCibert Fuller I ' -·-·-··---·-----------""-;::on:e~:~9~7H:;::4~7;·890:;::2=~·---·---·--·-···-----·~· l J':rlnl f<!r. Display H o~ . I I • Questions? Ch&Ck OU\ the De,niUona PfiW! or Fmqtu)nlbt Aslt!d OuutJgns CFAQl. • Please toke our J!II!X!lt to tel us .oboul yout experience with the onllru> petmlts sit&. PriY acv Stl!!ement 1 Dlsc!almqr Tetzbnfntl Ap•§"'!FS!" Eomdtitmmns!f!nl'nl!!a!t!mr~ Federal Homo Paaa llllate Home Page II Tgpq!P'!Q! (lTV :I ' I .! I # 1/ https:llwww .don~.~~tate.co. usJplslrealiBP WEB _lnap~on,_ GUT.Show •• Page'/p user ~-·,.. Y/512009 il p.2 19703843470 # 1 I 04-24-09; 13:54 ;AVALANCHE rtlgt: I Ul 1 Colorado The omclal state Web Portal ""'~~ D .o.'Z'.· ~ ~:~>1·· ·v -~a ~~~~~. • lfl",u • Division of Registrations Departmcmt ofRegulatoJY Agendas Electrical and Plumbing Permits Online View Inspection for Permit 649963 • /ndlcetes Required Field Inspection Permit #: 649963 Inspected Date: 04/07/2009 Permit Holder: AVALANCHE: CREEK E:NTERPRISES LLC Site Address: 82 Riverbank ln. City: Glenwood Springs State: co Zip: 81601 lnspecf1on Type·. Rough In Status/Action: Accepted Relnspoction Fee Paid $: Comments: Corrections: Meter reJ enRe ·~ OK No building permi.t card aveilabl~ Inspector's Name: Robert Fuller Phone: 970-947-8902 ..... --------------------.... -------------........ ---------------------------" ----------------------------, . -----------------· . -------------- Request inspection J [ Print for Display J/ OK • Questions'/ Check out the lli!Jinitions Page or frequently Aske_d Questions (i=AQ)_ • Please take our !.>JJrY!ll!. to tell us about your experience with the online permits site. Generate<.~: 04124/2009 01 :30 p.m. Privacy StatemeJJ! ! Disclaimer lf!j;hnlcal .. f.!islst.aoct;; E:tuaillnfqrmat!on TeCilrroloqM,.;:3acliQ.!l Feder~! Home Page JI_State !:lome P,age II Oepartmel]t Home_ PagQ D;>p of page --- !;-.Mail the !1l~lslol1 of Registrations 1560 Broadway, Suite 1500 Denver, GO 80202 (303) 891~~!Hl5 · Phone (ao;;) 1394 .. 2310-Fsx Relay Cp!orado \HY (English & Srlr)llil>h), Voice, VCO, ASCH, STS Ae.srs!flnC:t~ Numbers) https://www.dora.statc.co.us/pls/real/EP WEB Inspection GULShow Page'lp user _ _type... 4/24/2009 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Hepworrh-T\.twlak f)~'Ot(~chnic;ll, lnc. 5020 County RowJ 154 G!enwond Si.n·inl:;;;. Colorad() Sl60'i Phon..:: 970-945~ 7988 Fm~.: 970-9·15~ti4.54 em;-1ii: hpg¢o@hpgeott:·<h.onn FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 82, IRONBRIDGE PHASE 2, FILING 2, RIVER BANK LANE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 108 USA APRIL 14, 2008 PREPARED FOR: NORTHWAY CONSTRUCTION ATTN: RICK KOEHLER 981 COWEN DRIVE, UNIT D CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 Parker 303-841-71 I 9 o Colorndo Springs 719-633-5562 • Silvenhorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. - I - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2- SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ..................................................................................... - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -3- FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... -4- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -4- FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -4- FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... - 5 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... -6- SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -6- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... - 7 - FIGURE 1-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 AND 5-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6-GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at Lot 82, Ironbridge, Phase 2, Filing 2, River Bank Lane, Garfield County, Colorado, The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Northway Construction dated March 24, 2008. HepworthcPawlak Geoteclmical previously conducted geoteclmical engineering studies for the subdivision development and presented their findings in rep01ts dated October 29, 1997 and February 12, 1998, Job No. 197 327. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a tall one story shed roof structure with an attached garage above a partial crawlspace and partial slab-on-grade floors. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 2 to 5 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Ifbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this rep01t. Job No. 108 !!SA -2- SITE CONDITIONS The site is located on the notth end ofRiver Bank Lane near the intersection ofRiver Bend Way. The site was vacant of structures and clear of snow cover at the time of our exploration. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with scattered bmsh. The ground surfuce slopes down to the east at a grade of about 4 to 5 percent in the building area The Roaring Fork river borders the rear (east) side of the property. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Ironbridge Development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous studies for the subdivision development, several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Ironbridge Development. These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in ru·eas of the Roaring Fork River valley. The closest mapped sinkhole is located roughly below the intersection ofRiver Bank Lane and River Bend Way about 80 feet to the northwest. Another sinkhole is located to the southwest in the 16th fairway. The subsidence evaluation for remediation of this sinkhole was presented in our report dated July 7, 2006, Job No. 105 115-4. Both of these sinkholes appear to be associated with the underlying bedrock condition. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it crumot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 82 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low and similru· to other lots in the area; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for Job No. 108 liSA -3- sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 2, 2008. Four exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure I to evaluate the subsurfuce conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative ofHepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I. D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were retumed to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurfuce conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils below about 6 inches to 18 inches of topsoil consist of3\lz to 6\lz feet of silt and sand overlying relatively dense slightly silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders. About 2\lz feet of sandy silty clay was encountered over the silt and sand in Boring 4. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing perfom1ed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing Job No. 108 I! SA -4- perfom1ed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the silt and sand, presented on Figures 4 and 5, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading with a high compression potential after wetting and under additional loading. Results of gradation analyses performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 1 Y, inch fraction) ofthe coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 6. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. Free water was encountered in Boring 1 at a depth of 8 feet at time of drilling and 7 Y, feet the following day. No free water was encountered in Borings 2, 3 and 4 at the time of drilling or when checked 1 day later and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The soils expected at the relatively shallow cut depths proposed consist mainly ofloose silt and sand suitable for support of shallow spread footings with a moderate settlement potential. The silt and sand soils encountered above the natural granular soils are compressible after wetting and under loading and there will be a risk of settlement. Extending the bearing level down to the dense gravel (about 3 to 4 feet below the assumed footing grade) would reduce the settlement potential and risk ofbuilding distress. An altemative with a low risk of settlement would be to excavate down to the sandy gravel soils and re-establish design bearing level with compacted structural fill. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. I) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils or compacted structural fill should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of Job No. I 08 liSA -5- 3,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement offootings designed and constructed as discussed in. this section will be about I inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches fur continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement offoundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf. 5) Any existing fill, topsoil, silt and sand soils and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing areas should be moisture adjusted to near optimum and compacted prior to constructing footings or placing fill. Structural fill used to re-establish design bearing level should consist of a granular soil similar to the on-site gravel soils and be compacted to at least I 00% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. There is some risk of differential settlement if the underslab soils become wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to sln·inkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab Job No. 108 liSA ~tech -6- reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAlN SYSTEM Although free water was encountered below expected excavation depths during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that the ground water can rise during spring runoff and local perched groundwater can develop during times ofheavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoffcan create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill sunounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Y, feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: Job No. !08 liSA -7- 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor denSity in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of12 inches in the first I 0 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the fust 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation \Valls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential :fbr wetting of soils below the building caused by ilTigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsw-fuce conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface Job No. 108 l l 5A ~tech -8- conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during qonstruction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared tor the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verif'y that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC ·Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. LEE/vad Job No. I 08 115A APPROXIMATE SCALE 111 = 30 1 --- LOT 83 I L (' " I " I ', r\ I '-J -, I I I I I I ----~------------~ -I 5935------- "' / / / \ ----..__ ----' li'OA/i'#VG FORK li'IVE/i' ', 5930 108115A c:ol£iech LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS H worth-Powlak GeotfJChnlcot _.-5950 ~ 5945 - --5940 LOT81 --- Figure 1 5940 5935 Q) (j) lL 5930 c: :§ 0 ili iii - 5925 5920 108115A BORING1 ELEV.=5936' BORING2 ELEV. = 5937' RNISH FLOOR ~ 5938' 9/12 WC=5.2 DD~76 7/12 -200~59 wc~3.8 10/i2 DD~91 9/12 T 37/6,50/9 BORING3 ELEV.= 5938' 14/12 7/12 WC~4.3 DD~79 -200~63 40/6 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. BORING4 ELEV.=5939' 13/12 6/12 wc~6.3 DD=84 50/12 WC=2.7 +4=44 -200~11 ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS He worth-Powlak Geotechnical 5940 5935 1il 5930 (j) LL ' c: 0 ~ r1j 5925 5920 Figure 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt and clay, moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, stiff, moist, brown. SILT AND SAND (ML-SM); stratified, loose, slightly moist, light brown. GRAVEL (GM-GP); with cobbles and boulders, sandy, slightly silty, dense, moist to wet with depth, light brown, rounded rock. 7/12 ..2i!. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPl), 1 3/8 inch !.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 7 blows of a i 40 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches . Free water level in boring and number of days after drilling measurement was made. Depth at which boring caved. T Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates that multiple attempts were made to to advance the boring. · NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on April 2, 2008 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DO = Dry Density (pet) +4 = Percent retained on the No.4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve . ~ HepWorth-Pow!ak Geotechnical 108115A LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Moisture Content = 3.8 percent Dry Density = 91 pet Sample of: Silt and Sand From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet 0 -,...... 1--t-- 1 #. 2 c Compression 0 upon ·o; <f) 3 wettina !'! a. E 0 0 4 5 6 \ 7 \ \ 8 9 \ \ 10 \ \ 11 \ 12 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf 108115A G~tMech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HopWorth-Powlak G&Otochnlcol Moisture Content = 6.3 percent Dry Density = 84 pcf Sample of: Silt and Sand From: Boring 4 at 4 Feet 0 -;-1"--.... 2 * 4 c: Compression 0 upon ·c;; wetting "' 6 ~ 0. E 0 () 8 10 1\ 12 \ 14 \ \ 16 \ 18 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-kst 108 115A ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 HeoWorth-Paw!ak Geotechnical HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I _I. A HR TIME READINGS I 24H. 7 0 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8' 3/4" 11/2' 3" 5"6" 8" 100 10 20 30 0 ~ 40 ~ w "' I-50 ~ ffi a.. 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 ,300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS ClAYTOSILT FIN€ S>NO MEDlUM 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 76.2 152 203 127 ANE COARSE C089LES GRAVEL 44 % SAND 45% SILTANDCLAY 11 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Boring 4 at 9 Feet 108 115A ~ HepWorth-Pawlak Geotechnical GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 108 llSA SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORING DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (PSF) 1 2 3.8 91 Silt and Sand 2 2 5.2 76 59 Silt and Sand 3 4 4.3 79 63 Silt and Sand 4 4 6.3 84 Silt and Sand 9 2.7 44 45 11 Shghtly Silty Sand and Gravel Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information AssessQrlireasurer PropertyJ3earch I Assessor_SubsetQYm I As1>~sor S<!les_Search Cterk & Recor~er Rec§ption Search ParceJ Detail I Valu_eJ)etail I Siiles D..etflil I ResidentialLCsHnmen;_iaLinmrovement Detail Lan~d_Detail I I'.hotogmphs I Mill Leyy Revenues Detail I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I 090 II R043402 II 239501428082 II 64.976 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jEMBREY, GAYLE j414 ELK CIRCLE jBASALT, CO 81621 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) lsECT,TWN,RNG:1-7-89 SUB:IRONBRIDGE jPUD, PHASE II, FILING 1, 2 & 3 jLOT:82 PRE:R041512 BK:1596 PG:871 jBK:1565 PG:600 BK:1560 PG:438 IBK:1560 PG:431 BK:1057 PG:0745 IBK:1028 PG:768 BK:1028 PG:597 jBK:1006 PG:743 BK:1951 PG:734 /RECPT:728310 BK:1822 PG:287 jRECPT:702424 BK:1822 PG:283 IRECPT:702422 BK:1822 PG:250 jRECPT:702421 BK:1782 PG:269 jRECPT:694479 BK:1782 PG:264 jRECPT:694478 BK:1747 PG:1 IRECPT:686745 BK:1218 PG:738 IRECPT:572583 BK:1218 PG:715 http ://www.garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23 9 50 14 28082 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6110/2008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 jRECPT:572582 BK:1217 PG:266 I jRECPT:572131 BK:1206 PG:852 I jRECPT:569200 BK:l206 PG:780 I jRECPT:569199 BK:1206 PG:768 I /RECPT:569197 BK:1206 PG:734 I jRECPT:569195 BK:1206 PG:662 I /RECPT:569194 BK:1206 PG:637 I jRECPT:569192 BK:1206 PG:629 I /RECPT:569191 BK:1206 PG:574 I IRECPT:569190 BK:1063 PG:0578 I IBK:1063 PG:0571 I Location I Physical Address: 11416 RIVER BANK LN GLENWOOD SPRINGSj I Subdivision: j/IRONBRIDGE PUD, PHASE II, FILING 1, 2 & j I Land Acres: jlo I Land Sq Ft: jj32,021 I I Section II Township II Range I 1 II 7 II 89 I 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 356,78011 103,4701 I lm(!rovements: II oil 0 I Total: II 356,78011 103,4701 Most Recent Sale Sale Date: 117/13/2007 Sale Price: 11450,000 Additional Sllles Detail Basic Building Characteristics II Number ofResidentialllo http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelN umber=23 9 5014 28082 6/10/2008 Parcel Detail I I I I I I Buildings: J Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type 2007 II Tax Payment: First Half 2007 II Tax Amount 2006 II Tax Payment: Second Half 2006 II Tax Payment: First Half 2006 II Tax Amount Mill LeyyJ3.evenues Detail fuof£age II Amount I II ($3,089.60)1 II $6,179.201 II ($289.40)1 II ($289.40)1 II $578.801 Assessor D;~tabase Search_QJ>tions I In~flsurer Datahall.e Search OptiQ.!ls Clerk & Egcorder Datab.as.e Search Opti.9IJ.Jl Garfield Coun.tr Home Page Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Jums Software. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Nurnber=239501428082 6/10/2008