HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application-Part 21.
P.?.
NOV A7 'BE A4 47PN hESI T'1RIN 5TRETT LRLI OFFICES
This Agreement is made this
-
day of November, 2000, by and between George R'
Kitby, Farley S. Kitby, ioint ten6ts, "iir rvri,trr.qilg.fnctr ( hereinafter "K.LBY") and
Roaring Fork pres!'-!.r-r-c, a cotoraao riniitdo tiabitity company (hereinafter "RFP")'
RECITALS
WHEREAS, KILBY is the current owner of certain real property situate in Garfield
County, State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS,RFPisthecurrentownerofcertainrealpropertysituateinGarfieldCounty,
State of Colorado, and said propertfls aO:acent to tt'tb XiUgV property; and
*HEREAS, prior to RFp,s purchase of the property the prior owner granted to KILBY a
non-exclusive road access."".r*n-t or"ittt" litopltty oi RFP from County Road 100
to the KILBY ProPertY; and
WHEREAS, a6 of the date of this Agreement, KILBY has not buitt suctr a road: and
WHEREAS,RFPandK|LBYhavedeterminedthatarelocationoftheroadacoess
"ill-rn*t'rs oesiraurt toi uotn KILBY and RFP; and
WHEREAS,RFPhasagreeg!!ogranttoK|LBYanon.exclusiveroadaccesseasement
o"!i tttJproPertY owned bY RFP; and
*HEREAS, KILBY haS agreed to abandon the non-exclusive road access easement
granted KILBY ov ine pricil owrer "it'" property now owned by RFP'
NOW, THEREFORE, for an! in COnsideration of the mutual promises and agreements
contained herein, the suffici"n.y "nl'iO"q""V of wnicn S nereOy acknowledged' RFP
and KILBY agree as follows:
GRANL,?F R6'AD EASEMENT, RfP hereby g-ants and dsdicates to
KILBYardthetrR,ffi ss-ffiand"*"bPj:L:-":':I3H'*rxHr&r'
fiHl"ffi#fr il;t ;o easemenr Ejrt*rr.rly. -ne;cnii^ed o* EXH,tBrr
.A* to pror*de ".#"'ir"*-Co,rntv
n":J {m airces thre \ande of RFB to
the rhnds of l4lgf wri,t efr" rffi! [o oonstnet, rep'an ar'rC nraintaln a
roagr,ray thereu,o^-;r.dt" insiall, ,"pait, a,td manntain ut\lry servicea
^/
Page 1 of 7
NOV E7 'EE Ae:43rPI7 I'IEST HRIN STREET LHI''I OFFICES P.3
under said roadwaY.
I rishts !! lLq -t9ad^-1^l .^ lf ll EIV hrr;:#;i;;ffiffit J"tciioeo in EXHlBlr *B' ind granted to KILBY bv
2,
a oeeo oat'ea oecemuer 30, 1999 from Dennis Gerbaz as sole acting-
i,,.tee of the NILE GERBAZ CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRUST
and as sote actinglrustee of the DENNIS GERBAZ CHARITABLE
iinAATHOER UN[TRUST, said Trustee boing RFP's immediate
prEa"."".or in title to said property, and sa6 Deed recorded as
freception No. S573SS on Declmber 30, 19-99 in the Offlce of the Clerk
anJ ne"order of Garfield County, State of Colorado'
amendment must be ini written frorrn-and executed in the same manner
as this Agreement.
ATTORNEYS' FEES : CpSrS,. ln the event that litigation is ne@ssary to
reement' the prevalling party shall be -
entiged to reason"ui" "tto.eys;fee,
and cosis of suit actualty incurred in
such litigation.
CoUNTERPARTS.ThisRoadEasementRelocationAgleem.e$'nalry
executed in duplifite original counterparts, each of which shall constitute
an original, but
"fi
oi urf,i[f' shatl constitute one and the seme document'
tN WITNESS WHEREOF, KILBY and RFP have caused this Road Easement
Rerocation Agreement to be executed on tne day and year first above written- Two
separate signature page6 following'
The road easement
?*Hl:s"ytl#,tsJffi ;'i,' ;;i' -n i ii6 " u i no i ns upo n and i n u re !o- !l*:::1*1 Kr L,BY an d
LrlLrlJtglrY qllv gr...,..-v -r--r.
their successors "nO."iigni.
fn" road easement abandoned and
vacated herein shall be dEemed as forever abandoned and vacated and
such action shall be deemed a covenant running with KILBY's land and to
ifre Uenegt of RFP and their successors and assigns.
This Ag reement constiMes4.
;*j"e ; atter nei& n .
-t'r
o f, rom !s9 o r..1nae-[1\yg 13: P:11 11?:: g:H
ildffi ffi ft ;;i;il;s;;iat'*,tl.HI::,_1",-,T,1'*1'S:"hereinffiiffitffi, ;;6i;. eipressty set forth herein' All prior and
;,#liiilH#o.is";Alii;'il;;;t'd'1n0"o1119i1s:.b:S.ltheparties
}e
.Jmffi;d-ffi #ts.d i.to this Asre e ment' lnY .':.9lfi"1lT ::
5.
6.
Page 2 of 7
NQV A7 'EE @?I4?PI1 I^IEST NHIN STREET LRI^I OFFICES
Signature Page One
ROARING FORK PRESERVE, LLG, a Colorado limited liabillty company ("RFP',)
By:
Oavia S. McMorris, Manager
STATE OF COLORADO }) ss:
couNTY OF GARFIELD ) ,
Acknowledged, subscribed and sworn to before me this 93y.ot November' 2000'
by David S. McMonis, as Managet oi iLaring Fork Prese'rve, LLC, a Colorado limited
liabilitY comPanY.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
Nornnv PUBLIo
P.4
Page 3 of 7
.
NOV A7 '@A
.AZZAEIN
HEST HRIN STREET LHI^I OFFICES OE
Signature Page Two
GEORGE R. KILBY AND FARLEY S. KILBY, JOINT TENANTS, AND IIiAYFLY BEND
RANCH ("KLBr)
Fartey S. Kitby George R Kilhy
STATE OF COLORADO )) ss:
couNTY OF GARFIELD )
Acknowledged, subscribed and swom to before me this day of November, 2000,
by George R. Kilby and Farley S. Kilby, Jolnt tenants.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission exPires:
NOTARY PUBLTC
Page4 of 7
t/
NOV E7 'AA. AE"4dPM hEST HAIN STREET LRH OFFICES
lEXHlBlT "A"
A 60.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF I.AND SITUATED IN GOV'T LOT 15' SECTION 36
TOWNSHIP Z SO[fN-, RNNOE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY Of OnniieiO, STATE OF coLORADo; SAID EASEMENT LYING 30'00
FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
CoMMENCINGATTHEWITNESScoRNERToTHESoUTHQUARTERCoRNER
oF sEcTloN 35, TOVrruSHtp 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH
pRrNcrpAL MERrDrAii; rleHcr ruonrH 86 degrees 1s minutes 37 seconds EAST
s114.4g FEET TO A POINT oN THE ltOnrnenlV RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNW
RoAD No. 100, THE PotNT or eEGiltlNlNG; THENCE LEAVING sAlD NoRTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 01 degree 55 minutes 13 seconds wEST ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE 62.67 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALoNG sAlD oENTERLINE
ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 250'OO FEET
AND A CENTRA[6NOLE Of SS O"giees 29 minutes 51 seconds, A DISTANCE OF
242.15 FEET (CHORD BEARS nOdfn 26 degrees 25 minutes 28 seconds EAST
Z3Z3O FEET); rHEruce gONTINUING ALON6 snlO CENTERLINE N9RTH 54
degrees 10 minute" 23.."onos enir e0.62 FEET; THENCE goNTINUING AL9NG
SAID CENTERLINE ALoNG THE nnC Or A cunve To THE LEFT HAVING A
RADtus oF 250.b0 FEET AND A Cir'rrneu ANGLE OF 37 degrees 08 minutes 30
seconds, A DISTANCE or 162.06 rEet iqUg,ng-eEARS NORTH 35 degrees 36
minutes 0B seconJr EnSf $g.24 ieea;;'fprfr't-CE GONTINUING ALONG SAID
CENTERLTNE NORTH 17 degrees 01 frAiUUfE 53 seconds EAST 66'61 FEET;
THENCE coNTtNUING ALoNo sAto CENTERLINE ALoNG THE ARc oF A cURVE
TO THE RtcHT Hevirvb A neOrus Or sOO'oO FEET AND A cENTRAL ANGLE OF
23 degrees 30 minutes OO ""conO"lR
DIST{NqE-OJ 123'05 FEET (CHORD BEARS
N9RTH 28 degreei +o *inrtes 53 """ono" EAsr 122.1a FEET);THENCE
CoNTtNUtNG ALSNG SAID CeNrECUtrue UonrH 40 degrees 3lfilnutes 52
seconds EAST 2 1 5. 98 FEET; TH ENCi Cor'rrr r'rulNc ALo NG SAI D CENTERLINE
ALoNG THE ARC OF A CURVE To THL LEFT HAVING A RADTUS OF 200'00 FEET
AND A gENTRAL ANGLE oF 67 o"gieu" ig minutes 45 seconds' A DISTANCE oF
zgs.ozFEET fcnono aEAns uo-nipr o6 deg-re-es.52 minutes 00 seconds EAST
ZZ1.7t FEET); THENaE CoNTlNUir'rC nr-O1.r[ sntp gENTERLINE NSRTH 26
degrees a7 minuies 53 seconos wEii g!i.r 1 FEET; THEN6E CONTINUING AL9NG
SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RAD|USoF400.00FEETANDncEr.rrnALANGLEoF2ldegrees24minutes54
seconds, A DISTANcE or 149.51 iEif tcHqlqgEARS NoRTH 37 desrees 30
minutes 20 seconds WEST 148.64 FEET); iHerucE C9NTINUING ALSNG SAID
CENTERLINE NORTH 48 degrees ti minutes 47 seoonds WEST 44'04 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAib CiT"ITENUINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE
P.6
Page 5 of 7
, NOV A? 'Aq A2:43PI'1 I{EsT NHIN STREET LHI^I OFFICES P.7
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1OO.OO FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
iA augi""s 1B minutes 08 seconds, A DISTANCE OF 31.94 FEET (CHORD BEARS
NORI:H 39 degrees 03 minutes 43 seconds WEST 31.81 FEET) T9 A iolNT ON THE
r1onrHrRlYEgUNDARY LINE, THE TERMINUS, WHENCE THE WTNESS
COiHen TO THE SOUTH OUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 BEARS
souTH 63 degrees 21 minutes2? seconds WEST 3668.54 FEET.
Page6of 7
P.E
Nov E7 '68 '@?'44P11 I^IEST I'1RIN STREET LHI^I OFFICES
EXHIBIT ..B"
A60.00FooTW|DESTR|PoF!|NDS|TUATEDlNGoVTLoTlS,SEcTloNS6
TOWNSHTe 7 Sd[ii, nnrucq€a_w1si oF tre sxrH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN'
CoUNTY OF GAR}iETO, STNTE-Oi.COLONNDO; SAID EASEMENT LYING 3O.OO
FEET OF THE rOii-OWiMC OESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
BEGINNING AT A PCANT FROMYSHICH THE WITNESS CC'RNER FORTHE SOUTH
6UARTER COnnien 6f SnfO SeCirOu i5Eeens SSUTH 86 degrees 25 minutes
f .3 seconds wEsr, A DtsfAN_C.E9t'iszi.sz FEET; iiEr"ge ruonru o8 degrees 23
rninutes E9 seconds ilSf, f. pfsf f^N-Ci OF lrf g'ZB FEET:' THEI{CE NORTH 0O
deoree or mintrrcJia-"""ono' E{#' ; orsl4ryqE-gr eza'ra FEEr To A PorNr
w*rcn ts r HE TERN,TNU s l*o- rSotlr wtriCn r Hr wri nrss co'RN ER F oR TH E
sourH ouARrEE'bon*En or_9e6iioi,i is sEans sourH 64 desrees 24
minutes +Z seconOs WE,S.[ ' A DISTANCE OF 3808'84 FEET'
PageT of 7
a
Amendments to Application
Submitted to the Garfietd county planning Department
Decemb er 20,2000
The documents in this section were submitted to the Garfield County planning
PtpryT.nt in response to the StaffReport of l118/00. These documents are includedherein for ease of reference by the Board of County Commissioners on July 9, 2001.
Note-l' Sopris Engineering - Mayfly Bend Ranch, Supplemental Engineering Report"date December 19, 2000 (4 pgs) was submitted in response to the statrnepoi of I l/g/00and is found in Appendix H - Engineering Report.
George R KilbY
505 SandY Lane
Anniston, Alabam a 362O1
December 20,2000
Ms. Kit Lyon
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Mayfly Bend Ranch - Preliminary Plan Application
Dear Kit,
Following is our response to the 11i8l00 StaffReport. Pursuant to our recent
discussions we have organiied our response according to the sequence established by that
document. We have atready addressed some of these matters, but we include them so as
to have a complete cataloging of the Staffs areas of concern.
We call attention to your conversation with our engineer, Mark Butler, and to
Section 4:41 of GarCo Subdivision Regs. as it may pertain to Burlstone's comments.
This section states that the PreLiminary Plan should include "stfficient detail... to answer
basic engineering questions...but that. ..detailed construction, engineering and design
plans *it b" deieloped at the time of Final Plat submittal." We observe that Burlstone
'has made u "o-p."h"nsive
engin."rirrg analysis, including considerations that would be
developed at Final Plat. Our engineering firnr, Sopris Engineers, has prepared a
Supplemental Engineering Report that r-sponds to the matters raised by Burlstone. We
undirstand that the Planning Department *ants all issues resolved at Preliminary Plarq
but that final construction details are required at Final Plat submission'
Pase 1. Request:'O*lgn"r of 1l/8/00 amends our application to eliminate request for ADU
approval as part of this subdivision action, We now understand that the request for
"'rrrptoy..
tiving quarters in the barn results in an application for five (5) residential units'
Page 1, Section I., RELATI
We now ptopot" n". 61 A*"ttirrg units ort 40 acres for an average density of one
(1) dwelling unit per 8 acres.
Page 2,Section I., RELATIONSHIP TO Trm COMPREruNSIVE PLAN (continued)
Exhibits + *a g of th" application indicate that the site is in a Low Density
Residential District, and has r"pii" system constraints due to a high water table. Exhibit
9 identifies a floodplain bazari creaied by the Roaring Fork River that runs along the
north boundary of ine site, and exhibit 2 indicates that the site is suited for agricultural
use. This application recognizes these conditions, and since the request for ADU approval
has been withdrawn, we believe that when viewed in
""lp"iiur. with all of the goals and objectives of the
it's totalitY, this Plan is now
1 995 ComPrehensive Plan'
of Water Resources:
we assume that this statement will be revised to change the reference page
number and refer to Mr. Knox's letter oi i ll7l11finding "no material injury to decreed
water rights."
Page 3, Section III'J. Colorado Div.
Page 3, Section III,M. Garfield
Page 4, Section III,, M. Garfield
Page 4, Section III,
County Public Nurse:
Response to this comment is covered in section dealing with use of ISDS'
Environmental's noxious weed survey' and amended
the covenants to include specific r*g*g.-r.g*ding weed management and revegetation
plans.
County Engineer:
Our engineering firrn, Sopris Engingflulg' has frl1ed a comprehensive
response to the Burlstone Inc. comments. This response is attached to and made part of
o* g.r"rul response to the 11/8/00 StaffReport'
Page ,Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS' A' Compreher-rsive Plan:
We call attention to our above t.tp-o*. on itit subject' We trust that the
reduction in density will enable Staffto iira ,f,it proposaf io be consistent with Comp
plan goals. We understand the noted;;;; il U" p"1'*ily related to the density that
would have been occasioned by ADU uppioryf, and trust that Staffwill frnd this
development to be in the best interest oiireatttu safety, and welfare of Garfield County'
Page5,SectionIv,STAFFCOMMENTS.B.Zoning.SqbdivisionandPhasing:
with respect to staffcomments o=-n lot aoigl,, *" have revised the building
envelopes on the two lots mentioned. We ha,re refuoved general note # 4 on Sopris
g"gi"Joi"g drawing, sheet 1 of 4, as suggested'
Page 5, SectionIV, STAFF COMMENTS' C' Water: ..
Whereas the Sketch Plan contemp-lateal inaiviaual wells' we now propose that 5
units be served uy iwo shared wells. since these wells have now been drilled, tested and
2
M. Garheld
found to have excellent quatity and abundant capacity, we proposed to furnish the needs
ofthe suMivision fromthese two shared wells. We call attention, however, to the
covenants: Ms. Caloi4 page 4 of 6, Para. 8. Additional Wells. This provision enables the
buyer to drill a well on their property at their own expense if that is their wish.
We call attention to Zancanella Associates letter of September 6, 2000 with
attachments. This letter precipitated Ndr. Knox's letter ofNovember 7,2000 wherein he
found that the proposed water plan would cause no material injury to decreed water
rights, and is adequate for the proposed subdivision.
Regarding compliance to section 9:53, we have recently been advised by Mr.
Zancanella as to the County's current view of shared wells. We had previously
understood that a shared well did not constitute a o'community water system."
The reference to this section quotes certain design details and the requirement for
design by a qualified engineering source. Please be advised that we have retained the
services of Zancanella Associates and Sopris Engineering, and that both ofthese firms
meet the qualifications described in section 9:53. To date, Sopris has concentrated on
more general engineering objectives, but we have assurance from both of these firms that
the water system design that has been submitted for Preliminary Plan meets the
requirements of 9:53 as will the flral details submitted at Final Plat.
Page 6, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS. C. Water: (continued)
We make the following comments regarding the proposed method of irrigation,
compliance to sectiorffiJ and Commission comments on flood inigation at Sketch
Plan q:tl
The deed from Dennis Gerbaz conveyed 23.5 % of his % interest in the 'oSlough"
Ditch (Water District 5, DitchNo. 139, having priority numbers 274A and 309 for 49.26
CFS as of May 31, 1884). This results in inigation water availability of 2.89 CFS.
Flood irrigation has historically been successfully used on these fields, and our
plan carefully avoids disrupting this method. We recognize the improved effrciency of
sprinkler irrigation and have retained Zancanella Associates to advise us in this area. The
pond proposed for the barn lot is intended to serve as a reservoir that could enable future
development ofthis method, however, we have reached no conclusions as yet and do not
propose any changes to established method of flood irrigation as part of this subdivision
action.
We have already addressed the matter of potable water, and will address fire
protection in a subsequent section ofthis document.
Burlstone comments on Water are addressed by the Sopris Supplemental
Engineering Report.
Page7, SectionIV, STAFF COMMENTS, C. Water: (continued)
The staffcomments on the 10127100 discussion with Mr. Lis regarding ponds,
applicable water rights and well permits were referred to our water attorney, Ms. Caloia,
and certain covenant changes have been made and necessary permits applied for.
Mr. Knox's letter of l0l2l00 has been discussed earlier in this document.
PageT,Section IV, STAFF COI\'flvIE-NTS, D' Fire Pr-otection:
w" u"kno*1ffi-Gffi."f"r"nce to CRFPD comment at SketchPlan: "water
supplies for fire p.ot..ioo will be limitJio water carried on fire apparatus and by tanker
shuttle." In the meantime we have ugr"J io *op"'ute with.the Roaring Fork Preserve in
their plan to provide ,to.ug. of *uter-for fire proiectiorl as this was suggested by Mr'
Zancanellain his .upurity"u. consultant to RFP. Mr' Zancanella's letter of 8/23100
mentions this plan for information purposes, as we have no direct connection to the RFP
subdivision beyond the shared access road. z'ancanellaAssociates is responsible to RFP
for details of this ,to.ug" piut, although we have also retained this firm to advise us on
water related matters.
Page 8, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS, E' Sewer:
As a result of H-p Geotech's coilerrts on *ater table and geologic4.Tai"gt'
we retained Sopris g"gi*oi"g to advise us on design of septic dispo^salfacilities'
The preliminary plat states *ISDS design to L done by a professional engineer
licensed in the state of colorado. ISDS locati;n will be site specific per size and location
oruuitaiogandmeetallGarfieldCountyseparations.',
Mr. yancy Ni.rror, a principal oisopris Engineering, has ,advrge! that there are
several appropriate "engineered" ISDS ,toi..t rorltris fte, and that the best selection
would not only be site specific but also made concurrent with the building plans for each
|ot. His firm furnished a representative general document pertaining to maintenance of
ISDS, however he advises that specific iraintenance instructions must be tailored to the
type of sYstem used.
The covenants have been modified to require the lot owners to follow
maintenance procedures appropriate to their sysrcm, and give the HoA enforcement
procedures and remedies'
Burlstone cornments on ISDS are addressed in the Report prepared by Sopris
Engineering. .r ,1_-^:_ ^r^^-+:^ ,lio^^oar .
we agree with the staffcomment that further analysis of septic disposal is
appropriate and appreciate staffsuggestions. we understand that Staffand Burlstone
comments as to use of ISDS were largely based on the inffeased density created by the
request for ADU approval. We further understand that this concem is alleviated by
elimination of that request. Sopris grrgi"""ti"g has examined other alternatives to ISDS
and due to our pr"j;;i;. and'locatioi, ,ron i.r" found to be feasible alternatives. Site
specific ISDS finai design will be required at the time construction is permitted'
page g, Section IV, SIAFF COMMENTS, F. Radiationlf,oils/Topography.
The staffcomment is correct ttrat trre title of the IIP Geotech engineering
document refers to a "Proposed 4 Lot iubdivision'" The document, however' describes
on page 3 that..Five exploratory pits were excavated at the locations shown on fig' 1 to
evaluate subsurface conditions." Examination of Fig' 1 confrms these five pit locations
are coincident with the four lots and tft" Uu* area idintified on the Preliminary Plan Map
prepared by SoPris Engineering
The staff is also correct that the FIP Geotech report states that "The development
will be serviced Uy irrai',,ia*l wells urJt"pii. disposai systems'" We would like to point
out that this statement is in the introduction of the report and is intended to establish llP',s
4
basic understanding that these 'ttilities" would be developed "on site" vs' furnished from
a municipal or other "offsite" source'
The scope of FIP's contract had only to do with a geological evaluation of the
existing zubsurface conditions, and was noi intended to give advice as to the merits or
disadvintages of an individual well vs' a shared well'
we trust these explanations will resolve the perceived inconsistencies, however if
a letter from FIP is stitt needed we will be glad to obtain it prior to consideration of this
application by the Board of County Commissioners'
We have added plat notes;d covenants to ensure disclosure of potential
geological hazards and/or cost attendant ttrereto'
Page 10, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS, G. Floodplain/-Wetlands:
The 100-year floodplain Uounaary is shown on the Preliminary Plan Map' and the
Royal Coachman Road appea$ to enter ihat area just before it reaches the north property
line of the development parcel. In preparing an application for a GarCo floodplain special
use permit, we found that ttre noodptain it,'1" A"t, to the west ofthis road, and this road
therefore does not enter the floodplain'
we own the adjacent property and plan to extend this road onto that parcel to
serve as a new u"""rr.'*" plan io Uuita on this lot and call attention to a 1996 survey by
Mr. Sam Phelps wherein ne founa the building envelope to be at an elevation above the
1O0-year floodPlain.
In 1998 we reconstructed approximately 1000' of riverbank onthis property
under an Army Cory of Engineers +b+ p"r*it (*tggllSq49, executed on March 3' 1998
and valid until tvlay t, 200I). This permit provided for''river restoration"'excavation
and discharge...in the channel and adjacei wetlands of the Roaring Fork River'" The
cobble that was removed from the rivlrbank was used to construct the current access road
to the above-mentioned lot. This road is also proposed as a secondary, emergency access
for this subdivision. This existing road enters the 100-year floodplain apryg]qlately
200, west ofthis r.rbdiri.ion prof,"tty line, on our adjacent property' In addition to the
Federal and State permits thaf were obtained for this work it appears, that a-GarCo
hooApUin special use permit may have also been required but not obtained'
With respect to this current subdivision application, since this secondary access
road already exists and since Royal Coachman Road does not enter the floodplain within
the boundalies of this suffiivision parcel it appears that, right or wrong in 1998' the
p€rmit matter may now be moot.
We act rowiJg. tlr. staffcomments pertaining to wetland identification, and call
attention to the report irepared by Beach Environmental LLC' We submitted this report
at the public hearing on til8lOO,--d t ort that this requirement is satisfied thereby'
With respect to an adequate letter of determination from the Cotp, we understand
from Mr. Beach that such will be required only if we plan any dredge or filI rlpact to any
wetland area. Mr. Beach has delineated the *Ltt*d areas on our site and has identified a
small area of encroachment by the building envelope on lot *t4. we have subsequently
relocated this building envelope to avoid e-ncroachment, and have been advised by l"Ir'
Beach that this chatg! wouldiliminate the need for any wetland permiting'
We will apprZciate the advice of the Garfield Planning Department on both of
these permit rnatters and will respond accordingly'
Page 10, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS, H' Wildlife:
We acknowledge staffcomments refening to "detail...on the plat
and...covenants" suffrfient to preserve riparian *a *itaff. habitat, and have added this
detail. Reference to the DOW commentssubmitted at Sketch Plan have been included in
the covenants, as has the county regulation regarding dog control.
Page 11, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS, I. Road/Access:- The application from the adjacent property owners for approval to suMivide 90
acres called "Ro*ing Fork Prese*e" lRfP; was based on an understanding that Mayfly
Bend Ranch would trave 5 units, and that is now the case. We understand that the "Rural
Access" standard denotes capacity to serve 1l to 20 units and based on 5 units in Mayfly
Bend and 13 units in RFP we conclude that to be the standard required for the access
road.
We would also like to point out that the name of this access road is the
prerogative of RFP, and "Mayfly Drive" was assigned by Sopris Engineering for
reference only.
We aiknowledge County standard, Section 9:33 that describes requirements for
cul-de-sacs and dead end streets, and have taken steps to see that our internal road design
complies with that Section. We comment here that Green Drake Road is considered a
strarid driveway for lots #1 and #3. It does not dead-end as it appears but would
continue, as a driveway onto Lot #3, and a turn around will be required by covenant at
that point. We acknowledge the staffcomment as to the 600' length restriction of Section
g::3. ahhough our engineiring firm recommends against it, they have made provisions
for a turnaround on this road. We also note that Royal Coachman Road serves only one
subdivision lot.
We acknowledge the staffs concern respecting relocation of the current access
easement to the "r.."nily planned course of this road. We submitted a document entitled
"Road Easement Relocation Agreement" at the hearing on 1l/8/00 that will be the basis
for this action. In the meantirn-e we have met with RFP representatives and they agreed
to furnish the evidence that staffrequested.
We acknowledge the County requirements respecting public dedication of
suMivision streets and mainterumce thereof. Our covenant restriction of certain vehicles
is not intended to affect use of public rights-of-way, but rather trails and private roads
over which the HOA will have control. We have taken steps to eliminate any confusion
in that regard.
Acost sharing agreement with RFP is being drafted that will cover construction
and mainterulnce ofthisiommonly used access road and will be properly incorporated
into the covenants.
Response to the Burlstone transportation comments is included in Sopris
Engineering document.
Page 14, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS, G. Drainage:
The staffcomments preceding those made by Burlstone Inc. accurately describe
the drainage aspects ofthis parcel. Our engineering frm has properly identified and
quantified the only drainage basin that feeds storm runoffonto this parcel in a drainage
study dated 7126100. This study was in response to Staffs finding of "incomplete" on
7l2OlO0. OTAK Rock Creek Studio reported on 8/1/00 that all documents pursuant to the
incomplete finding had been delivered to the Planning Department' we do not find this
document in the final bound application Aaiea 9/1/00]or in the documents submified by
the Planning Department to the Coromirrion on 11/8i00' We have therefore concluded
thatthere was a.i."o***ication witHornK this document was not submitted and
therefore not reviewed by Burlstone. It has been submitted with the Supplemental
Engineering Report prepared by Sopris Engineering'
There is a second drainage U*i" tfrit create-s runoffon ttrc RFP parcel and would
require considerati"" i"1fr. desiln of tn" *".ss road serving these su6ivisions' Most of
the runoffon Ma,fly g."J R"r;h Cftmnl*Uaivision is sheit flow that goes directly into
the Roaring Fork River.
The comments by Burlstone are extensive and some of their "drainage" objectives
may be beyond th";;;; oftnit sugivision process. Response to these comments is
inciuded in the Supplemental Engineering Report'
Page 14, Section IV, STAFF CONAdE-NjfS, K' Qpeq Space:
The staffre;"; h* "r.*tty d.scribed and charactetrzed the 2l-acre coilrmon
use, open space parcet that we seekto create. In addition to these 21 acres'
approximately S acres ofop., space *iiLU" added by virtue of the NDE portions of the
residential lots. The HOA will be responsible for maintenance and administration of
these approximate 29 aqes. All roadi, irrigation dltghes, hayfields, pastures' utility
easements and shared wells will be located on the 2l-acre parcel identified above'
The term ".qrrio" condominium' has been struck from the covenants' as we do
not wish to introduJe the separate subdivision process that would be brought on that
concept. The common *" L* will contain stalls for the use of lot owners' but access
thereto will be uf"tJ.A UV rental or lease provisions administered by the HO+'
Statrcommeni. pr.ruunt to alternative means of accomplishing the suffiivision
objectives for common elements is appreciated, and will be given serious consideration
as we prepare covenants for final adoition. We call attention to treatment of
maintenance responsibilities for the op"n ,pa"e (common areas) as described in the
Covenants: article VI, Para.11. Common Areas and Open Space'
Page15SectionIV,STAFFCOMME-NTS,L'AssessmenfFees:
We were *u**. *tif t.t"ntry of 3ection 9:81 of SuMivision Regulations' as
the copy that we obtained from the ffanning Depart-ment in January 2000 contains
amendments ttrou+ fetruary 19,1997. We read Section 9:81, as applied in RE-1
School District, to require conveyance of land for a school site when such is reasonably
necessary to serve the proposed developmelt, 9r a cash.payment in lieuthereof' We
understand that the Board of County Cimmissioners wiil make that decision at the time
of Final Plat approval, and therefore conclude we have no responsibility to address that
matter at this time.
We are unable to identiff "statements to the effect that some of the required
improvemerr* *ouiJU. installed by individual lot owners." Recent communication with
staffhas clarified the applicant's responsibility under the SIA, and we do not anticipate
any misunderstanding in that area'
o
7
Page 16, Section IV, STAFF COMMENTS. N. Plat Notes and/or Covenants. Etc.:
We acknowledge staffcomments respecting Plat Notes and Covenants and
commit to clarification as needed.
With respect to parking spaces, Land Use Summary on Preliminary Plat (Rev.
08123100) and section 5.01.02, we acknowledge that the County requires the suMivision
plan to provide suflicient parking for its intended use. We are unable to predict the
ultimate size of the dwelling units that will be constructed, but specified four (4) spaces
per lot on Plat rev.08123100. This land use summary has been revised to reflect
elimination of previously requested ADU approval, but we have retained the requirement
of four (4) spaces per residential lot. Since the "barn lot" is a common use parcel, we
will design more parking there at Final Plat.
We have clarified and added plat notes and covenants as suggested by staff,
Page 16, Section V, RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
We trust that the foregoing changes, amendments and clarifications to our
Preliminary Plan application will enable the Staffto make positive findings in all cases
that warranted otherwise at the previous review on 11/8/00.
Page 18, Section VI, STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
We trust that the positive findings suggested above will enable staffto
recommend that ow request for approval of this Preliminary Plan be granted. We
comment specifically on the previous bases for denial as follows:
l. The requirements of section 4:91 have been met as evidenced by Mr. Knox's
letter dated lll7l00.
Although the site constraints still remain, the number of units has been
reduced to five (5), including the common use barn lot. We have committed
to continued investigation of ISDS waste water disposal options in an eff[ort to
implement the best, economically viable alternatives when construction is
permitted.
We have complied with the requirements of section 4:60 in that:
a. Beach Environmental LLC report identified jurisdictional wetland, and
found no encroachment except on lot ll4, and we have relocated this
building envelope accordingly.
b. The 100-year floodplain is located on our map and we have retained
Louis Buettner, a surveyor registered in Colorado, to mark this
boundary on the site. All building envelopes are located out ofthe
floodplain.
c. Wildlife impact is addressed by exhibits 6 and 7. Exhibit 7 indicates
this area to be in the mule deer winter range. Recommendations of
DOW have been adopted, and covenants insure that DOW fencing
2.
3.
8
4.
standards will be met and that all dogs will be kept under the control of
their owners. Improvement and protection of fishing habitat in the
Roaring Fork River, which flowi through the property, is a top priority
of this develoPment.
Pursuant to compliance with section 4:10 requiring evidence that applicant is
i" ah" process of obtaining all necessary permits, we call attention to
information presented ubJr" which indicates that the permits identified by
Staffmay not u. ,.qui..d. we understand our obligation under section 4:10
and suggest that our actions described above could be construed by Staffas
,uch.ildence. Whatever technical outcome of these questions, we assure
staffand the commission that we will provide such documents and proof as
may be required for Board approval.
With respect to the Comprehensive PlarU we believe that our proposal is now
consistent with the goals and objectives of "Water & Sewer Services" and
'T.{atural Environmental." Wittrrespect to recommended densitY, we believe
that although we propose a technical density of one (1) dwelling per eight (8)
u"r.r, our ipplication when considered in ii's totality, is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives pertaining to "Density' and
"Agriculture."
5.
9
Minutes of the Planning Commission Public Hearing
January 10, 2001
These minutes are included herein fbr ease of reference by the Board of County
Commissioners on July 9, 2001.
'-{1::E' \Jnr /o,7oo I
Radiation/Soils/Topography: HP Geotech recommends spread footings, shallow
foundations, and a slab-on-grade lower floor construction. The applicant notes
that plat notes and covenants have been amended to ensure disclosure of potential
geological hazards and"/or costs to individual lot owners. It is recommended that
a hydraulics or hydrological engineer be consulted for the final building footprint
location on lot 3. Both HP Geotech and the Colorado Geological Survey have
made specific recommendations and if they are followed, there does not appear to
be any geology related issues, which would prevent approval of the subdivision
request.
Floodplain/wetlands: The applicant must submit a signed and stamped statement
trom a registered professional engineer that the proposed road lies outside of the
FEMA designated floodplain map dated 1986 to support this statement. A road
was already constructed in 1998 on his adjacent property under a 404 permit but
without a Garfield Count-v special use permit. Lot 4 encroached into
jurisdictional wetland. Identification of wetland areas is necessary on the
preliminary plan.
o Wildlife: 11 recommendations were made by the CDOW. Covenants have been
amended to include these.
Road/Access: The Sheriffs Office commented that the County needs to ensure
all access roads are of sufficient width, and that any dead-end type roads should
have an ending radius large enough to accommodate fire or EMS equipment turn
around ratio. To date, the applicant has submitted an un-executed copy of a
"road easement relocation agreement".
Drainage: Sorpis Engineering anticipates that post development drainage will
have a small effect on the overall parcel due to the limited area being developed.
Open Space: All cortmon areas and open space are restricted to agricultural,
recreational. irrigation, and utility uses. It is unclear as to how the Barn Lot will
be owned and maintained. The covenants do not state whether the Barn Lot is
considered a common element or not. The restricted deeds for the open space lot
and the barn lot must be included as part of any final plat submittal.
AssessmentrFees: Currently, there is no road impact fee established in this area.
Plat Notes and/or Covenants: A number of plat notes are included in the staff
report. (page i3)
Staff is recommending approval of the Mayfly Ranch Subdivision Preliminary Plan with
2l conditions.
Questions or comments fiom P&Zwere taken next. Cheryl Chandler said that on page
l0 from the staff report related to living with wildlife, she would like to see the
recommendation from NRCS is added.
Moved to the applicant next for their presentation. Present tonight are the owner George
Kilby and his son Tom Kilby, John Dresser, writer of the covenants, Dave Michaelson of
OTEK Planner on the project, Yancy Nichols for engineering questions and Sherry
Caloia for questions related to wells.
a
a
Herb Nelson swore in all speakers for tonight's hearing.
Dave Michaelson wants to go over the recommendations and the design. Wanted to keep
properry agricultural in sryle. This is a relatively flat parcel. Issue of agriculnral land
and now residential and who will take care of? Have building and landscape envelopes.
(near 30 acres of the 40 will look like it looks) Management was the next issue.
Go through conditions of approval:
Page 14: items 1 &2 are okay. Item #3, Yancy wants to know what you are talking
about? Is stafflooking at yard landscaping? Mark Bean referredtoP&Z comments;
understood no flood irrigation used.
Ray Schamhl asked if they were going to continue to grow hay? Yes was the response.
Dave Michaelson says it works and will have someone maintain. Cheryl Chandler asked
where does runoffgo? Yancy says it goes on down. Sherry Caloia and George Kilby
spoke about ditch and water. Yancy suggests a plat note for no basements. Mark said
perhaps we could address item #3 before going to BOCC.
Items #4&5 are okay.
#6. Sherry addressed three ponds (l irrigation pond) doesn't intercept ground water. The
other two ponds need well permits and have applied.
Item #'7, bam parcel is a separate parcel. George will hold the deed. George would like
to have an equestrian type neighborhood but they are unsure who will purchase these lots.
George said he would deed restrict the barn parcel so there would never be a home on it.
Wanted to have control of design, etc. of this bam.
The employee unit is another wrinkle. Management could take care of property and
horses. George and Tom would like to build a barn for themselves and possibly lease out
space to others.
David Stover asked how would hayf,relds be maintained if no employee? Issue only the
lot and not the land. Tom Kilby said someone needs to be there on the property to take
care of the property maintenance. This provides an amenity. (potential not automatic)
Mark suggested dealing with this as a fifth lot. (barn lot) Will deed restrict for ag.
structure. Mark said to possibly limit the size.
George said people would have to pay a fee to use the stalls in the stables. Both Mark
and Jim Leuthauser said you might have to do a special use for any commercial uses.
Bam lot will have to become a member of the HOA.
Mark asked if stall usage is for landowners of these lots? George said the homeowners
have hrst dibbs would rent out stalls if vacant.
Tom Kilby said that if landowners don't participate in ag. use. will have to agree to live
with the ag. being done on the property. Stall fees would be paid to the HOA.
#8, both Yancy and Sherry addressed. Yancy suggests drilling 5 wells and get rid of
central water system. George agrees. Sherry disagrees with the staff s interpretation.
Mark said this is a consistent staff position. Sherry referred to the State policy. Mark
said we refer to the County Subdivision Regulations. Sherry said we could get additional
well permits.
Cheryl asked if wells would be for household use only? Sherry said no they would have
irrigation probably too. Prior to approval by the BOCC 5 wells will be in place. Sherry
said covenants would be joined too.
Cheryl asked about number of animals and what type would be allowed per lot? 2 horses
and one dog was reply and any other animals would have to be approved by HOA.
Sherry said we should change this statement about horses because one person may not
want any and the next might want four. Sherry suggests 10 horses for the whole HOA.
This clarifies item #9 as well.
Item #10 is okay. Item #11, Dave wanted a clarification about hydrologist having to
evaluate the potential flooding at the site. Mark said its more of a matter as to how you
are you going to address building in flood locations? Mark said the 1986 map for that
area is probably not accurate but that is what we have to use until a more updated one is
adopted by FEMA. Mark said it has to be a licensed hydrologist to perform inspections.
Yancy said drainage and septic plans should be engineered and part of building permits
process. Mark said some analysis needs to be done now and confirmation can be
presented at final plat. Mike Sylvia brought up that Lot 3 was close to the river and that
was included in the report.
Items 12 & 13 are okay.
Item #14, related to building envelops and minimum setbacks from riparian/wetland
areas, Yancy said that County Engineer says 30' and the DOW says 50'. Applicant is
asking for the 20'. Applicant said 30' would work for them and asks for that
recommendation to change.
Item #15, related to roads, needs some clarification. Do all roads in the subdivision fall
into the Garfield County Subdivision standards? Mark asked if your intent of the road
you are talking about is for emergency access as well as an access easement for George's
properry. George said he has a 12' access road to his lot" which carl serve as an
emergency access. There was a natural surface road built under a 404 permit. Mark said
that road could probably be categorized as a driveway and use as an easement. Will build
a cul-de-sac of some type.
Item #16-21 are all okay. Item 21(e) no commercial is being proposed.
Dave Michaelson they will apply for a SUP for the floodplain crossing. Mark said you
might want to clarifr the covenants to state nothing commercial but agricultural activity.
Mark said that should be a plat note and in the covenants.
Cheryl asked Mark if he is comfortable with all the explanations given. Mark said yes
but he thinks we need to work on the language before a f,rnal decision is made by the
BOCC.
Moved out to the public for comments and questions next.
The first speaker is Larry Gerbaz who is an adjoining properf,v owner. He has one
objection and several concerns. One item is they thought the density should stay as
recorunended so that there would be only for.r units and not five. He does support
George's right to develop his properfy. Other items of concern are the drainage.
Currently this is under 3 ownerships and he thinks it will be hard to coordinate efforts to
develop. Who is going to take care of the ditches beyond down the line? Who will be
responsible for weeds? Need to be assured that this is taken care of. Sewage is another
concern. Why should we be the filtration system for all of these other people. The water
table is extremely high in this area. Are the existing utilities going to be buried? That
was not addressed. Boundary fences are mutual maintenance and who will be
responsible.
Mark Bean said the sewage system would be required to be an engineered design. In
terms of whom you would go after in terms of weeds or fence maintenance, the County
requires that the HOA be an incorporated entitv. You would be able to go after the
corporation. Larry asked what if they were to declare bankruptcy? Mark said the
homeowners are members of the corporation and they are the board. Larry Gerbaz thinks
engineered septic systems don't work that weil in his opinion. Dave Michaelson said
they removed the ADU's to address some of the water and sewer issues.
Dave Michaelson said they would incorporate a weed management plan and a plat note
that says HOA to take care of this. HOA is to be incorporated.
The existing power lines will not be buried but all new lines will. No other public
comments so that section of hearing is closed. Move back to P &Z for further comments
or questions.
Ray Schmahl said he was impressed at sketch plan but feels applicants did a lousy job
getting all the details done before preliminary plan. 2l recommendations are
inexcusable. He cannot recommend sending this to the BOCC.
Michelle Foster likes the concept proposed. There are a lot of conditions that need to be
addressed. Not sure if we can incorporate all of these items into a motion.
Cheryl Chandler likes the look of this proposal. She has a problem with not seeing the
.covenants before going to the BOCC. Hard to make a recorrmendation tonight.
Mike Sylvia thinks this is a good project and he likes the rural nature and agricultural
look. Seems like a lot of clarifying is being done tonight and should have been ironed out
before tonight. He still has concems with floodwater irrigation and questioned has it
been looked at thoroughly.
David Stover said this is diffrcult to sort out. It is a good plan and it is almost there.
Herb Nelson said the applicants have a couple of options and that is to ask for a decision
tonight fromP&Z or you can come back at a later time.
Dave Michaelson said he understands the reality of 21 conditions. Eleven of them are
boiler points, which are included in every application; there are 10 real issues. Some of
the issues he thinks have already been cleared up. They are not changing issues,
clarifuing only. Dave would like to move forward and take this to the BOCC.
John Dresser spoke about the covenants and that they had talked to staff. Brought to you
as a board to get input on them. We hear from you that they are good but you want more
clarification of how things will be. Covenants state that George will retain ownership of
lot 5 and that is what they are asking for.
Tom Kilby said we seem to be in basic agreement with each other and don't see why
another meeting is necessary. We feel we have met requirements and we hear what you
are saying but we, the applicants, would like to move forward.
Michelle Foster made a motion to approve the preliminary plan with all conditions listed
in the staff report and the burden to get this done in time period allofted so that staff can
get to the BOCC within their time frame. No second was given on that motion.
Ray Schmahl made a motion to deny this preliminary plan application because there are
too many outstanding issues to be presented to BOCC in a reasonably organized fashion.
David Stover seconded the motion. No further discussion was made on this issue.
Motion passed (4 Y to 2 N)
-The next item on the agenda is a public meeting request is for review of a sketch plan for
the Heuer Subdivision. The property is located off of State Highway 82 and Cattle Creek
Road. The applicant is proposing 5 commercial lots on approximately 193,750 square
feet of land. (95,360 sq. ft. of commercial already exists) The applicant is High Country
Associates.
JeffLaurien presented the staff comments. In relationship to the Comprehensive Plan it
this land is designated general commercial for study area 1. Several issues in the comp.
Plan related to goals and objectives will be used when reviewing this application for
preliminary plan. Jeff identified the areas to the applicant to be aware of.
The properfy is approximately 3.5 miles south of Glenwood Springs. Access is via
CRi 13. A significant portion of this property is within the floodway/floodplain of Cattle
Submittedto,tffiXXil'.',ltt:Xf&'i','#l1l-Department
March 9,2001
The documents in this section were submitted to the Garfield County planning
Department in response to the Staff Report of l/10/01 and the 2l Conditions of approvalcited by the Stafftherein. The Applicant is uncertain as to whether these documents havebecome part of the record. and are included herein fbr consideration by the Board ofCounty Commissioners on July 9, 2001.
George R. Kilby
505 Sandy Lane
Anniston, AL 36207
March 9. 2001
Ms. Kit Lyon
Senior Planner
Building and Planning Department
109 8th Street. Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Mayfly Bend Subdivision Preliminary Plan
Dear
We trust the format of this response is acceptable, and we begin by restating a summary
of our proposal.
Development Proposal Summarv: Our request is to subdivide a 40.61 acre parcel into five (5)
residential lots with the balance being common open space. The proposed subdivision name is
Mayfly Bend Ranch.
This parcel borders the Roaring Fork River and is currently in agricultural use for
Approximately 75o/o of the parcel will continue to be usedlivestock grazing and hay production.
in this fashion. and the covenants will specify as such.
We are requesting approval of five (5) dwelling units. This will result in one
( 1) dwelling unit per 8.12 acres. The fifth Lot may also be used for agricultural structures and is
referred to in the application as the 'ubarn lot". If built. the barn on this lot may be made
available to the other lot owners by covenant and contract.
The access road to this parcel will be about 1800' long, and the entrance will be from
County Road 100 at a point approximately I % miles east of Carbondale. The Garfield County
Road and Bridge Department issued an access permit on l/18/01. The road will culminate in a
loop near the center of the property. Driveways from this road will access all four residential lots
and the barn parcel. A secondary Emergency Vehicle Access fbr the subdivision Aom the loop
east to the Roaring Fork Preserve property is also planned.
The plat will show an easement to access the lots in the Day Subdivision Exemption. Lot
#3 that is adjacent to this parcel.
Individual wells are proposed as the water supply for this subdivision, and well permits
have been obtained for these ponds. Basalt Water Conservation District contract #368 has been
granted for a sufficient quantity of water to cover the needs of the subdivision. The District
Engineer's Office has issued an opinion that the yrroposect rviiter sulrply is aclequate and rvill not
cause uraterial injrrry to existing water rights.
The ternrs of cledication lor the conrnon use parcel are included in the proposetl covettaltt
docunrent sLrbnritted with the alrylication.
All areas that niay iuvolve special precautions have been identifiecl and nrapped, and all
stuclies called lor in the Garfielcl Subdivision Regulations herve been done. 'fhe application
specifies that a prol'essional engineer registerecl in the State of Coloraclo will be recluired to
clesign the ISDS proposed for individual lots.
Prollosed lLesolution of Contlitions InrJroserl orr I'lan b), Stall'lleport ol'l/10/01:
Conclition 1. - Weerl Management Plan. & Condition 2. - Revegetation Plan. Garfield County
docunrents per-taining to Noxious Weecl Manargeurent aucl Revegetation Guidelines were
obtained ll'om Steve Anthony at the Clourrty Extension Service and lorwardecl to Beacli
Envirounrental, I-LC. Beach was coururissionerl to develop a vegetation n.lauragernent lllan fur
Mayfly Bend Ranch subdivision application. This plan is attachecl hereto as Exhibit A.
Condition 3. - Irrigation, Flood Prohibited. l'he applicant explainerl at the Conrmissiou hearing
that the recomnreudation of Mt Sopris Soil Consen,atiou District lespecting use ol'raw vs.
treated water lor irrigatiou would be lollowerl, anrl that the BWCD contract no. 3(r8 provides for
irrigation of 30,000 sq. ft.of lawn area on the four residential lots. This anrount of lawn will be
irrigatecl lrom the wells. The applicant intend to floorl irrigate the pasture/hayfielcls as has
historically been cloue, siuce the sutrclivision ilesign careltrlly ervoids disturbing this nrethod that
has been usecl successfirlly for ntany years.
CoricIitior-r4.-A.."@.I(erlrlyGardtler,GarCoRoadForerrratr,visited
tl**rt" ""1 ,l"trrr-r*t tl@ perrnit. 'l'he pernrit rvas issuecl on l/17l01 and a
copy is attachecl as Exhibit B.
Conclition 5. - Fees & CRITPD Reconrnrendations. 'I'hese lees are clue at Final Plat anrl rvill be
paicl. The CRFPD Reconrrnenclations will be followed.
Condition 6. - Colorado Div. of Water Bglgf{gg! All well pernrits have been obtainecl for
vto'99585wasissuecllorawellot}al1ac1joinirrg
property. See Exhibit C lor hrrther infonnation on well lrenlits ancl or-r rvelllternrit no. 99585.
Conclition 7. - Barn Lot Deecl. Discussion at the Conrnrission hearing clarifiecl tlre applicant's
,-tt",rt.rr-%,".1,,U, tl.ri t,
"ttcl
a subsequent comr-r'runication Ir-onr Mark Bean hrrther clarilying
this issue is attached hereto as Exhibit D. l'he covenants have l;eert revisecl to be consisteltt n,itlr
these clecisions.
Contlition 8a. - Cortrtriue Coverrant Documents. 'fhe applicalrt cxltlained at tltc Coltrurissiou
n,.,,"o*i-,",.AssociatioIls,btttrat1tertlrattrvo
larvyers hatlprepared diflerent parts of the proposed Covenants. 'l'hese clocunrents have beerr
conrbitted. The newly revisecl Declaration of Covenants are attached hereto as Exhibit Ir
Conditiorl 8b. - Resolve "Shared" Water Systenr. This qr:estion was resolvecl at the Cournrissiorr
lwellswottlclbeprovicledlorallfivelotsoI.tIre
sLrbclivision.
Corldition 9 - Stattrs of Well #2. This qLtestion was resolved try resolution olconilition ll8tr.
Condition l0 - ISDS Design by Clolo PE. l'his requirerrent is inclutlecl in current covepapt and
etrgitleerittg clocuntents. Applicant understands tltis to be a contlition of Iriltal Plat.
Conclition I I - FIIP Ceo Recotlrtnettclatiotts. This recluirenrent is includecl in currept covelapt ande,rgi,,eeilnclstlristobeacortditiotiofFiIralPlattvitllres1lectto
btrilcling ott Lot 3 and 4 only. Discussion at Conrnrission hearing regarcling I{p relerence to
"hyclrologist" was clarified liy Yancy Nichol. See attachecl letter fi'onr Dan Ilardin Exhibit E.
Conclition l2 - USGS Recotrtmetrdatiorx. T'his reqLrirenrent is incluclerl in currept covepapt erpcl
erstarrclstlristobeircorlclitiorlofI]irialI)Iat.
.I{oyalCoaclttlratrI{oaclisactuallyadriveway
easetlretlt to lot ll4. Aller Lot 4 it nray be usecl as the access to the Day lot /13. Any Flood Plain
issues lor the Roatl after it accesses Lot 4 will be acldresseclby 1he owrler o[Lot 3 Day
Subdivision iu a separate application lor a Special use pennit.
Conclition I4 - Wetland Setbacl<. Discussiott at Cornnrission lrearing establishecl that tlie Coglty
atttagreerltoirlcltttletIlisonFilralPlat.
Corldition 15 - CarCo Road Desigrt Standards. Applicant unclerstancls that this cosclition altplies
to all sLrbdivisions ttnless the BoCC nrakes art exception. This question arises fi'or1 copsicleratiol
of sectiort 9:33 regarcling ttse of a cul-cle-sac in roacl rlesigri. Altplicant 5as revisecl t5e roacl
clesign, ancl now proposes a loop on Green Drake Itoarr at sta. 5r 00. The Applicant proposes ir
secolldary access fronr this loop east to the Itoaring Fork Preserve ltroperty. Driveway
easetrretlts fi'onr this loop to lots #l ,ll2,lt3 and the barn lot will be graltecl alclwill 1ur ip t5e
oPell spaoe parcel. Tlie disottssion at tlte Comtttission hearipg establisfierl that Royal Coachlrarr
Road will be elinrinated as a subclivision road and be replaced by a th'ivewav easeprept to lot #4
ancl Day lot #3' The applicant ttttderstancls lhat these clecisions will satisly the recluirelrelts ol
sect iotr 9;3 3 irlc ltrtling the tteecl lor an emergency assess as part of the sybclivisiol longer desig,.
Colldition 16 - Relocate Access Easement fi'onr CRl00. 'fhis lnatter is underrliscussion with theacljacerltnouobeforetlrecoutttyIbrsubclivisiolr
allproval. We are cotlrmitted to providing aocess and both of us have agreecl that the locatiop of
the access zrs it crosses the other property wilr not be coutestecl .
Collclitioll l7n - A"""st Rou,l, Public , . Applicant unclerstands t6is to be a colditiop of
. See Conrlition lll5.
Condition 18 - Open Space Deed. Applicant unclerstands this to be a conclitio, of Final plat.
Qondition l9 - All Utilities BLrriecl. This requirement is incluclect in current engineeripgclocurnents. app-i"a,rt ,rra.^tt.r*rc this to be a condition of Final plat.
Conclition 20 - ADUs Prohibitecl In SLrbclivision. Applicant unclerstalc'ls this to be a co.ditio, of
Corldition 21a - Covenant Note re Larvn-.!g[4[g4. Covenants have beep anrepdecl
Conciition 2l b - Covenant Note re No Trespassing. Covenants have beel arnepded.
co.ditio, 2lc - cove,a,t Note re AoI. coverants have bee, anrendecl.
Condition 21d - Renrove ADU Relerence lronr Covenants. Relerence Renrovecl.
. Covenants have been ameuclecl.l'tshttlg access' The applicant ltas proviclecl an easement that all lot ow.ers ca, use toRoarirlg Fork River-for Fishing purposes. See Prelinrinary plat clocunrept.
Attachments:
access the
Exhibit A. vegetation Matragentent Plan lor Mayfly Benil Ranch Subclivisiop, Beac5
Environnrental LLC, January 27,2001. ((r pages)Exlribit B. carfierrr co,rty Roacr Access Per,rit, Jaruiiry li, z.oor . (4 pages)Exlribit C. I,for,atio, o. well perr,it No. 995g5 (r page)
Exhibit D. Cotllt'ttttrlication hom Mark Bean re Barl i-oi Deerl, .lanuary 25,2001 . ( I pg.)Exlribit Il. Letter fi'or,Ilp Geotech, Da. IIardi,, Jaruary 22,2001. (1 fage)
4
VEGETATION MANAGE
MAYFLY BEND RANCH SUBDIVISION
The vegetation management plan for the Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is designed to
establish and maintain a desirable native plant community while controlling noxious
weeds. This management plan is designated for all common areas including roadsides,
open space, the barn area, and utility easements on the Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision.
Ricommended control measures for weedy species will include cultural, mechanical,
chemical, and biological. It is our recommendation that chemical and biological control
be limited to the maximum extent possible and only reserved for large outbreaks of
noxious weeds.
Site Characterization
The Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is located in Carbondale, Colorado and falls within
the Rocky Mountain Region of Colorado. The site can be characterized as a montane
grassland. Mountain grasslands dominant species usually include fescues, oatgrass,
Junegrass, and Mountain muhly. The Mayfly Ranch is no exception, dominant grass
species include: Arizona fescue, Junegrass, and Mountain muhly.
Soil Characterization
Information about the soils were provided by soil surveys from the United States
Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. The primary soil type on the
Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is Redrob loanr, characterized as a poorly drained soil
on alluvial valley floors. Primarily derived from sandstone, this soil is moderately
permeable in the surface layer (-14 inches) and rapid permeability in the layers beneath.
The effective rooting depth ranges from 20-60 inches depending on the water tolerability
of the vegetation. The water table is fairly high and can be found at depths ranging from
l8-48 inches.
Noxious Weed Characterization
During the noxious weed survey, Beach Environmental, LLC, did not note any extensive
outbreaks of weeds. Limited, small communities of Russian Olive, Canada Thistle, and
Plumeless Thistle were found. Due to the aggressive nature of these weeds, the
vegetation management plan has established guidelines to help control the spread of these
species. These guidelines are reproduced from recommendations provided by the Native
Plant Revegetation Guidefor Colorado, a guide published by Colorado Natural Areas
Mayfly Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC - I -
DONIINANI'GT"\N,,III{C)II).S ON'TIII I\'IAYIiLY T}ENI) ITANCII StII}DI\/ISION
Festuca arizonica Arizona Fescue
Koeleria macrantha Prairie Junegrass
Muhlenbergia montana Mountain Muhly
EXHIBIT A pg1
Program, Colorado State Parks, and Colorado Department of Natural Resources and
recommended by Garfield County for planning purposes.
Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)
Description: This aggressive weed forms large dense patches of
prickly plants along the bottoms of intermittent drainages and
other areas with moist soil. This thistle, however, does not do as
well in continually saturated or inundated soils (although, it does
grow in seasonally saturated or inundated sites). It is extremely
difficult to eradicate because it has an extensive root system and
new plants can grow fiom even a small piece of root. One plant
can colonize an area up to six feet (1.8 meters) in diameter in one
or two years. Canada thistle grows to three to five feet ( I - I .5
meters) tall, has spine-tipped leaves, smooth stems, and small
lavender flowering heads.
Management Measures: In addition to prevention, the critical management measure is to
stress the plant by forcing it use stored root nutrients. The rnost effective way to prevent
this species is to revegetate moist bare soil.
Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpful, but not
completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is often necessary after the
thistle has been removed from an area.
Mechanical Control: Mowing can be effective when combined with herbicide
treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow
throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing alone,
without herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over several years.
Late spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant material is available
to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will have to be repeated
annually for several years or at three-year intervals'
Chemical Control: Herbicides can be effective, especially when combined with
mowing, tilling, and competition with other plants. Mow two or three times in the
surruner at monthly intervals (beginning at bolt to early bud-growth stage) and follow
with a fall application.
Biological Control: The larvae of the weevil Ceutorhyncus lilura bores into Canada
thistle, weakening the plant. This weevil alone will not effectively control thistle but it
can be combined with other methods. Urophora cardui is another insect that helps
control this weed. Grazing can be used in the spring and early summer to help control
thistle in riparian areas as well.
Mayfly Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC a
EXHIBIT A pgZ
Russia n -oliv e (E laeag n us ang ust do I ia)
Description: This fbst growing tree has silvery green leaves and
long thorns. The fruit is olive shaped. A European native,
Russian-olive has been widely sold in Colorado as an ornametrtal
shade tree. Along some streams, Russian-olive has completely
replace native woody vegetation such as cottonwoods, thus
reducing the amount and quality of wildlife habitat.
Management Methods: Russian olive trees can be controlled by either cutting the trees
down and treating the stumps with herbicide, or pulling the tree out of the ground when it
is young. The cutting method should be used on trees larger than two inches (5
centimeters) in diameter. Cut the Russian olive trees within fbur inches (10 centimeters)
of the ground. Within five minutes of cutting, treat the stumps with an herbicide.
Appropriate herbicides to use would include Garlon, the premixed product Pathfinder and
Rodeo. Garlon decomposes rapidly after application, in a day or less in sunlit water and
approximately two weeks to two months in soil. Rodeo (glyphosate) is specified for use
in riparian or wetland habitats. Monitor and implement follow-up treatment as needed.
Follow-up treatments are best completed the following June before any possible resprouts
have time to grow. Retreated areas should be monitored every 6 months until complete
mortality is ensured. Care should be taken not to introduce any herbicide into adjoining
waters.
Trees less than about two inches (5 centimeters) in diameter can be wrenched out of the
soil be means of a weed winch. Removal of small Russian olive trees will be easier when
the soil is moist so that the majority of roots can be extracted.
Plumeless Thistle (Carduus ocanthoides L.)
Description: Plumeless thistle is a member oIthe Aster family,
Thistle tribe. It is an introduced winter annual or biennial. This
plant can be distinguished from musk thistle by its smaller flowers
- l12to 1 inch in diameter. The leaves of plumeless thistle lack the
prominent white margin present on musk thistle leaves. The plant
may grow to a height of 5 feet or more. Flowers are reddish-purple
and are either solitary or clustered. -faproots are large anci fleshy.
Mayfly Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC -3-
EXHIBIT A pg3
Plumeless thistle is an extremely prolific seed producer. It is found in pastures, river
valleys, and along roadsides. It is rapidly increasing in this state, particularly in
northwestern Colorado (Pitkin, Garfield,and Eagle Counties).
Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpful,
but not completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is often
necessary after the thistle has been removed fiom an area.
Mechanical Control: Mowing can be effective when combined with herbicide
treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow
throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing
alone, without herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over
several years. Late spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant
material is available to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will
have to be repeated annually for several years or at three-year intervals.
Chemical Control: I{erbicides can be effective, especially when combined with
mowing, tilling, and competition with other plants. Mow two or three times in the
summer at monthly intervals (beginning at bolt to early bud-growth stage) and
follow with a fall application.
Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpftll,
but not completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is o{ten
necessary after the thistle has been removed fiom an area.
Mechanical Control: Moving can be effective when combined with herbicide
treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow
throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing
alone, withor,rt herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over
several years. Late spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant
material is available to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will
have to be repeated annually for several years or at three year intervals.
Biological Control: Unknown.
Weed Surveys
When controlling weeds, the weed manager shall be on the lookout for outbreaks of other
weedy species including but not limited to:
Mayfly Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC
Absinth Wormwood Perennial Perrperweed Yellow Toadflax
Black I-Ienbane Plumeless Thistle Blue Flax
Canada Thistle Posion Ilemlock Chicory
Common Burdock Russian Knapweed Common Tansy
Dahnation Toadflax Russian Olive Dames Rocket
-4-
EXHIBIT A pg4
Diffuse Knapweed Salt Cedar Mediterranean Sage
Dvers Woad Scotch Thistle Oxeye Daisy
Field Bindweed Spotted Knapweed Purple Loosestrife
Hoary Cress (Whitetop)St. Johnswort Scentless Chamomile
Houndstongue Sulfur Cinquefoil African Itue
Jointed Goatgrass Perennial Pepperweed Camelthorn
Leafo Sprrge Plumeless Thistle Rush Skeletonweed
Musk Thistle Volunteer Rye Sericea Lespedeza
Orange Flawkweed Yellow Starthistle
Planting and Weed Control Schedule
The proposed schedule for the Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is mowing of weeds
monthly during the summer months of June, July, and August, and following with a
chemical application during the fall month of September.
This schedule is designed for general weed control and is geared towards the removal of
the most comrnon weeds on-site (thistle). However, some weedy species such as
Russian-Olive require different schedules and techniques for control. It is important that
the weed control schedule remains flexible and is able to accommodate a variety of
weeds. The weed rnnager is responsible for identifuing outbreaks and if necessary,
redesigning the schedule to control that particular weed.
Once weeds are removed, it is important to reintroduce site appropriate native vegetation.
This will help prevent the return of weeds to that area. Revegetation with native seed
materials will occur amually during planting season. Seeds should be planted within two
weeks of shipment. The revegetation site shall be prepared and wetted down prior to
planting. Additionally, supplemental watering shall occur after planting to ensure a high
survival rate of native seeds. This can be accomplished through on-site irrigation.
Plant Material List
Plant materials to be used for revegetation planting will be native grasses either taken on-
site or purchased from a local native plant nursery such as :
Rocky Mountain Native Plants Company
2730 Snowmass Creek Road
Snowmass Colorado 81 654
970 927-0925
Pawnee Buttes Seed lnc.
605 25'h st.
Greeley, Colorado 80632
l-800-782-5947
Proposed species to be used are the dominant granimids already present on-site and may
include a mixture of one or more of the following:
Mayfly Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC -5-
EXHIBIT A pg5
PI,AN'| VIA'TIIRIAI, I-IS'T IIOIT'IIII N,IAYFI,\' I}IiNI) ITANCII SIIIIDI\/ISI()N
Festuca arizonica Arizona Fescue
Koeleria macranlha Prairie Junegrass
Muhlenbergia montana Mountain Muhly
Weed Control Service
Pesticide application will be provided for by a local weed control service company in the
Roaring Fork valley, including but not limited to:
Gallagher Agriculture Services 7348 County Rd 331 Silt 876-2864
Mountain Lawn 3758 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs 945-9333
Roaring Fork Vegetation Managenient CO. El Jebel 963-9723
Western Vegetation Management Aspen 920-9161
The Mayfly Bend Ranch Homeowners association will provide for payment for chemical
application and all other weed control measures.
0273r.01.doc
Mayfly Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC -6-EXHIBIT A pg6
Garfiel,d CottnQ
Road and Bridg,e DePartment
902'I'aughenbaugh BIvd., Ste 305
nifle, CO 81550
l'hone.(970)625{601 Fax- (97 01625'8627
Invoice Number:Invoice Date:y17/01
Bill To:George Kilby
Driveway Permit Number:
$15.00 per DrivewaY Permit-
Driveway Permit Fee: $15.00
Total Due:$1s.00
Thank You!
E@ABEHts
/r/t
EXHIBIT B pgl
Garfield Coun
Application Date : l/1 7/0 I
T ermin at ion D ate : 4/9/0 I
District: I
Apnlication for Drivewav Permit
Permit Number:17
County Road Number: 100
SuEContractor:
Permitee: George KilbY
Inspector: Kenny Gardner
George Kilby hereby requests permission and authority from the Board of County Commissioners to construct a
driveway approach (es) on the right-of-way offof county Road 100, adjacent to Applicant's property located on the
north side bfroad for the purpose ofobtaining access to properfy'
Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of the Board of county commissioners, a sketch of the
,i.i"r* installation showing all the necessary specification detail including:
1. Frontage of lot along road.
2. Distance from centerline of road to properfy line'
3. Number of drivewaYs requested
4. Width of proposed driveways and angle of app-roach
{ 5. Distance fuom driveway to road intersection' if any'
6. Size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach'
7. setback distince of building(s) and other structure improvements.
g. No unloading of equipment on county road, any damage caused to county road will be repaired at subdivision
expensc.g. Responsible for fwo years from the date of completion'
General Provisions
I ) The applicant represents all parties in interest, and aftirms that the driveway approach(es) is to be constructed by
him for the bona fide purpose or r""*ing access to his properfy and not for the purpose of doing business or
servicing vehicles on the road riglrt of way'
2) The applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the
construction of the driveway(s). eii*ort rnuil be ctmpleted within thirty (30) days of the permit date'
3) The type of construction shallbe as designated and/or approved by the Board of county commissioners or their
representive, and all materials used shalibe of satistactory quality and subject to inspection and approval of the
Board of County Commissioners or their representive'
4) The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board
of county commissioners and their duly uppli,t"a agents una ",nitoyle
shall be held harmless against any action
for personal injury or properfy durrrug, srsiained by ury ,.uron of the exercise of the Permit'
5) The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or ciearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portiorr of
thedrivewayapproaclr(es)even,t,",gr'.l"po,it".Ionthedriveway(s)inthecourseoftheCountySnowremoval
oPerations.
EXHIBIT B pg2
1.
Specifications
A driveway approach is understood to be that portion of the county road right-of way befween the pavement edge
and the p.op.rfy line that is desigrred and used for the interchange of traffic befween the roadway and abutting
property.
At any intersectioq a driveway shall be restricted for a sufficient distance from the intersection to preserve the
norril and safe movement of traffic. (It is recommended for rural residence entrances that a minimum
intersection clearance of 50 feet be provided and for rural commercialentrances a minimum of 100 feet be
provided.)
All entrances and exits shall be so located and constructed that vehicles approaching or using them will be able to
obtain adequate sight distance in both dire,ctions along the county road in order to nurneuver safely and without
interfering with county road traffic.
The Applicant shall not be permitted to erect any sign or display material, either fixed or movable, on or
extending over any portion ofthe county road right-of-way'
Generally, no more than one approach shall be allowed any parcel or property the frontage of which is less than
one hundred (100) feet. Additional entrances or exits for parcels having a frontage in excess of one hundred 100)
feet shall be iermitted only after showing of actual convenience and necessity'
All driveways shall be so located that the flared portion adjacent to the traveled way will not encroach upon
adjoining properfY.
No commercial driveway shall have a width greater than thirty (30) feet measured at right angles to the centerline
of the driveway except as increased by permiisible radii. No noncommercial driveway shall have a width greater
than twenty (20) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by
permissible radii.
The axis of an approach to the road may be at a right angle to the centerline of the county road and of any angle
befween ninefy (90) degrees and sixty (60) degreeJbut sfi'all notbe less than sixty (60) degrees. Adjustment will
be made ur.oidi,g to tf,e rype of traffic to be served and other physical conditions'
The construction of parking or servicing areas on the county road right-of-way is specifically prohibited'
Commercial establishments for customer vehicles should provide off-the-road parking facilities'
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. The grade of entrance and exit shall slope downward and away from the road surface at the same rate as the
normal shoulder slope and for a distance equal to the wiiJth of the shoulder but in no case less than twenty (20)
feet Iiom the pavemlnt edge. Approach grrA"t are restrictecl to not more than ten percent (10%)'
I l. AII driveways and approaches shall be so constructed that they shall not interfere with the drainage system of the
street or county ,o"i.in. Applicant will be required to provide, at his own expense, drainage structures at
enfiances and exits, which will become an integial part oltne existing drainage system. The Board of County
Commission"r, o, ih.i, representative, prior to instillation, must appr{f,ve the dimensions of all drainage
structures.
Note: This permit shall be rnade available at the site where antl when work is being done' A work sketch or
drawing of the proposcd driveway(s) must accompany application' No permit will be issued without drawing'
blueprint, or sketch-
EXHIBIT B pg3
l)
Special Provisions for Excavation of Road Surface and Installation
Any oversized material, (larger than 10 inches in diameter), that is not utilized in backfill will be hauled offby
permitee. Further, any frozen material will be retnoved from site by permittee-
When a paved or chipped surface is cut, it is to be replaced with a minimum tkee-inch (3") hot mix asphalt patch.
Temporary patch wiih cold mix asphalt would be allowed, which would be replaced with hot mix asphalt when
the weather or availability of mateiials allow the work to be completed. An asphalt or chipped surfac-e cut would
require the road to be straight cut and squared by mears of a pavement cutter or saw. A chipped surface cut will
require a seal coat of the patch, which will be full width or half width of roadway when trenches run with the
road. For trenches across the road, the edges ofthe seal coat will overlap the existing edge. All seal coats wjll
overlap edges by a two of the roadway inlhe vicinity of the excavation. Asphalt hot mix or cold patches will be
complited in a maximum of five (5) working Days. Weather permitting.
when possible all installations should avoid the top edge of a hll slope.
Installations in drainages subject to flash flooding will have a minimum bury of 4 feet deeper than normal flow
line at nearest abutment, wing wall or culvert.
Installations at culvert crossings will be buried beneath the culvert with a minimum separation of 18 inches
between installation and the bottom of the culvert'
open trenches adjacent to the traveled roadway shall be backfilled daily to within 100 feet of the working area of
the trenctl and shall be barricaded with warning devices after dark. A 3 foot high orange plastic fence will be
installed daily to keep livestock out ofthe open trench after hours.
In areas being disturbed where vegetation is established, reseeding with a mixture either by broadcasting, dril]ing
and mulching with seed mixtures iuitable to the climatic conditions or existing vegetation will be performed' Use
onty certifiej'weed-fiee seed. Noxious weed control will be ongoing along with revege[ation'
The permittee should check the R-O-W of surrounding landowners to see if other permits are required, i'e', BLM,
Forest Service.
Representative Garfield County Road and Bridge
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
2,2.4
George
EXHIBIT B pg4
6)
7)
8)
In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall
be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence, and all posts and wire
,"rnou.i shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners.
No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without written
permission of the Board of County Commissionsrs'
provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Board of County
Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and
incorporated herein as conditions hereof.
Soecial eondi!ions:
2. stop sigrq lS"culvert
3. subdiuitiot entrance shall be asphalt 3" thisk liom cr I00 back to property line'
4- the approach will enter at a g0degree angle to CR 100
.5. ury n"* fences,rocks, scrubs,diri, or other decorative items shall be on property of subdivision not on county
right of way
6. any sigrrs overhead or otherwise shall
obstruct line of sight.
be on subdivision properry, not on county right of way and shall not
7. 3'4" roadbase shall be laid and used until weather is warm enough to permit asphalting, so as not to track mud on
county roadg. esphalt or concrete will be placed as soon as weather permits
g. Driveway will be subject to final inspection when completed
10. Responsible for two years from the date of completion
1 l. Must call Jake Mall at 876'2348 for final inspection'
In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (es)
described herein the Ajplicant signffies that he his read, unrlerstands anrl accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions
IgSUl lugu lrLl vllr ue . rl
and agrees to const.u.t'til;'Gi;,iiU:";f5?[:;h"S:"ffi:r# specincation plan reviewed and approved
Sionerr: \ //-<=.'-"--(44
Address:
Telephone Number:
permit glanted lllil0l. subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein'
For Board of counry commissioners' of Garfielcl county, colorado:
Representative of Garfield County Road and Bridge Signature
EXHIBIT B pg5
. A1i1.B/2681 88:.18 976945b493
a'
Subdivision Driveway Permit
George R. KilbY
MayflY Bend Ranch Subdivision
(970) 947-9733 (Ivan Perrin residence)
(256) 237 -7289 (KitbY Home Phone)
(2s6) 310-2027 (cell)
North side of Cr.l00,
Stop SiSn
15" Culvert
Subdivision entrance shall be asphalt 3" thlck from Cr.100 back to
ProperrY line.
s The approach will enter at a 90 degree angle to Cr. 100.
Any new fences, rocks, scrubs, dirt, or othcr deoorative items shall
be on property of subdivision not on county right-of-u'ay.
Any signs overhead or otherwise shall be on subdivision properfy,
not on county right-of-way, and shall not obstruct line of sight.
)'o" roadbase shall be laid and used until woather is wrrm enough
to permit asphalting, so as not lo track mud on county'road.
No unloading of equiprnent on county road,any damage caused to
county road will be repaired at subdivision expense.
{"nn&fr Q*r,lrr"(
PAGE E:1.
EXHIBIT B pg6
cnloll & Iloupr, I',.C.
A'I'I'OITNtrYS A'I' I,AW
SIIERRY A. CAI-OIA
JEFIIERSON V. IIOTJP'I'
BARBARN P. KOZEI-I<A
MARK E. IIAMII-]'ON
I2O4 GITAND AVENUE
GLENWOOI) SPITINGS, C]OLORADO 8 I60I
(970) 945-6067 - VOICE
(970) 945-6292 - FACSIMILE
Please tlirect cort esltontlence to tlis adrlress
PAIIK AVI]NI-IE PROFI]SSIONAI, BLDG.
I2I NOR'TII PAIIK AVE,., SIJIT'E R
MONl'nOSIi, COLORADO 81402
(970) 252-0180 - voICE
Setrder's ennil: scoloio@sopris.rrel
Ir4ar-clr 8,2001
I(it Lyon
Garfi eld CoLtnty I'latrtrittg Developttleltt
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwoocl Sltrirrgs, CO 81601
Ile:A[a.1,fl;, Rend Ranch &rbdit'ision/lllell l'ertnil No. 99585
Dear I(it:
Encloserl please find a copy of the well pertlit for the rvell listecl above, Tlris well is
curreptly in existence anrl sel'ves tlre llroperty locatetl Nortlr atrd West of the Mayfly Bencl
Property. It is trot on the Mayfly Bend prollerty. It was llernritted to serve a 6 acre piece of
property rvhiclr is clescribecl in tlre pernrit application attaclred ltereto. It is owtrecl by Alain Laval
t5e currelt owuer ol the 6 acre ltal'cel. l'lease fincl the necessary clocttltlents whicli clo establish
1his.
Please call if yott ltave any clttestiolls.
Sittcerely,
CALOIA & }{OUP]', P.C.
.r&/tt,
Sherry R. C(toia
t/ /,t-/r--
SAC:nll
Enclosures
cc: George l(ilby
Kll-llY t-yor-lr 2
r1
r'L^
wn,J-5_-7 5
Application nrust
lre r;onrJrlete wlrere
a1r1-llicable. 1- ype r:r
print in B LACI<
lNl(. No overstrikes
or erasrrres urrless
irr i t ialed.
COLORADO DIVISIONI OF WATEN NESOUNCES.3ffiffill&Hil., -T8ffii Slrt: rran St., Derrver, Colorarlo 802-03
ta,3_
P E R M I r APrllcAIlQl\l FQ r-{!\/!
( )A PEnMIT TO trsE GnOtJl\,t) WATEll( x) A PEnMll TO COr,rS r 11 r.]Cl A \,VEr_r_
FOFI: ( 1) A I'EllMlT'fO INS IAt,l, n ['LlMl'
( ) nEPI.ACEMEt'J f Ft)il rJo( ) or l-rEn
WAT EN CJOUN] CASE I.IO
a^*
rl[cEl\/[t)
JUN ].2'78
I'tAIt-R B[SfrufEr|
s{HtE r}regsttl
AE'l
ASPLIAANT
l\lAN4E
-KATlIAtllN[
L. ll0Bl'lINGSllAit
STREET ROx _1006
CITY T:ARBONDA],E,-_COLOE*{l?
TE t EPI-lol.lE f'lo ----96-l:3242
(2) LO_9AI tAI!_Qf_rnOItQSED wELL
CoLrrrty ---_- .. Jlarf_Le1d_
--]'lE----)6
of the-Sli ____- %, Secrion j5
rwp.--7- --S, Bng --08-- -lL, 6t'h *
ll'l.Sl lE,W)
(3) WAIEE tDEAllp IVELL pAlA
ProJ;osed rrraxirnrrrrr ;trrrnJ;irrr; rate (gpm) __ ___15
Average anrrual anrount of ground waler
to be approJrriatcd (acr e.feet) :
--I-L-
Nurnlrer of acres to l)e irrigated: -____ l-,0-
Proposed lotal clepttr (f eetl:_-...---. _ i5
Acluifer grounrl water is lo be obtained fronr:
-- Gralels_ ___
Oyrner's n,ell <Jesignatio,r --*- -/Vr, /
-G^RouNp*ruAIEB-Lo_ltElLSlS_EQ&
( ) i.lOL,SEllOLD USE ONLY rro irrigarion (0)
roti orFlcE us
lteceilrt l'!" -q-
stDi
E ()NLY: DO
t-^w-
fl() I Wll ll E lN I lllS COLUlvlt'J
(4) DB,L!=LER
Naru e ----XOLI.INS,-DRILIJNG-
Sr, uer DQK 3IS :l 7 5
cri ty _Jtarhqulale___ d,*Jer:ado__ rr.!6'+L_
Q-QNQI]IQNS O F APP IIOVA L
Ilris well slrall lte used ir) sucll a way as to cause
no nraterial irrjtrry to existirrg water rights.'[he
issrrarrce of tlre perrrrit r.loes not assure tlre apJtlicarrt
tlrat rro injtrry will o0our 1o anotlr0r veste(l water
riglrt or pr er;lurle anotller ()wr)er oI a veste(l w.lter
riglrt frorrr seel(inU relicf irr a civil r:ourt actiorr.
APPNOYED TON DOIJIIS'IIC IJs!], I}I(]LUDIIIO TIIOInnrc"l'Ir0f, 0F ]t0T Ovn]R 0lm] ionE 0[, il01{E
G,AIDE'[8 itlD LrlW]tS .
AI',l', L l! a-t I 9N AltP tr_Q v F_!l
Q()l:BqI'tinNll I I'lUl\4llItl r-/-r
DN I E ISS JET' J UN E.L 1978
( x ) DOMEST rc (1)( tLIvESTOCI< (2)( ) COMt\.4EBClAL (4)
( )orllEn (s)
DETAIL TIIE USE ON
)rNDUSTntAt (ri)
)rnntGnlroN (6)
)N4Ur!lCtPAl- (B)
tt/rCK ttrt (1 1)
Teleplrone No. 96ll-2&f2--- Lic. Nri. 611t Z :,t* ul ' ,*'ri,?* - (r()r^rr, ,j]1-
(5) TUE_ t-OCAT ION Of -tllE_[IIOPOSE_D WELL an(l tl,e a,ca o,,
wlrich,tlte wqtpr will be useci must be irrdicated orr llre diagrarn llelow.
tjse thb CENIE[i SECTl()nJ (1 sectiorr, 64(.] acresl for rlre wetl loca(iorr.
(6) IIE WEI.L MUST t]E LOCATED BELOW
by <Iistances from sectiorr lirtes.
? 5O0-- fl. frorn _hb,*,,lru*o_i_s-.,c. tirre
- 485 - lt. lrorn
-\*g*;it1 -
sec. lirte
BLOCK ==_--FtLil',lG *
---l-l
I'i-l
I-t---l
l-t-l
Irl
Irl
I
-i_--l
Il-+
I
--r---l
-f- -
. 1 MILE
+
NORTl-I S
I
-t--
I
-f--
I
-l--
I
_t--sc|uTlI s
+
-t"-
_t_
I
l{ --
I
I
t-
I
,l
il
=lolFL-otuJlat
hl3[--
L
I
I
I
t-
+- -l-
I
tl-
I
-l-l
I
rll
I
-l- _- r-
I
l+
If-+
]--l---*l-
-F -I- |
I
EcTlOr'l LINE rT-l.-lL_ _ _t_I'lalrll:$-r-lirI r.plel,l,-f -- l- - l-lrll.rl_
iECTION LINE I
I++-l-tl
+- f---t-
LOr_B_-
SUBI)IVISION
(7) UIACr ON WI-IIQH WEL_L_lMLl_gE
l=OqAIEA owner:K, -I.^_yor-.1 ng6rar
No. of acres 6 -
tlre only well on tltis tract? yac
(Bl PROPOSEp cASltVG PnOGBAnn
Plairr Casing
S- 5 /-[--in. f rorrr -- 0 (r. rc -
22 lr
6 5/B _in. tronr ?2 ft. to___31_rr
['erforated casing
frorn .--=-_-ft. to.'- '
-
ft.
in. from ft to_-=.-- lt
(S ) !--QB-BE!!A! EUEN| WEL LS sive tlis tartce
arrd direction lrorn old well arr<l Jrlarrs for plrrgging
it:
The scale of the diagrarn is 2 inches = 1 rrrile
Eaclr srnall square represenls 40 acres.
WATER EOUIVALENTS TABLE (ttounded Figuresf
Arr acre.toot covers I acro of land I foot dcelr
I cubic foot per second (<:fsl . . . 449 gallorrs per ntirrure (gpnr)
A lanrily of 5 will require approxirnately 1 acre.f oot ol waler per ycar.
I acre loot . . . 43.560 cubic feet . . . 325.900 oallons.
1,O00 gpnr purrrpetl contirrrrously lor one rlay produces 4 42 aqe.lee\.
(10) taNQ_a_N_l ,rltct-t (inouNp wArErl_YVtLL BE [$JED;
Owner(5): *---KATIIA&INE-L,-II0RNINGSIAR . I'lo. of acres: - -.- 6
Logal description:
-Lr:t-tlJec*--35--_Io!urshl-pj=..S.--Itauge-iB
lrl. - --see fu].ljega1-aLLached - --
(11) DETA!LEp-llESCBIII-TI-AN of the trse of grounrl water: tlouselrold rrse arrrl clorrrestic wells nrtrst inrlicate ty1:e of
dispr'rsal systenr to be rtset'' ,lo,,rf1okl, 1ayil,_garden_nn(.1 liye'gqck r.ratpilog-__
---Ias
po s a1--s:7s Lelr-=Jarf leJ.d-l-qrrnty-J.p prcve d-,
Vlill tlris be
NORTl-I SECTIOT.I LINE
( 1 2) SIllEtLWAItre-B lli[-lT$ use<r
Tylle or riglrt
on tlris lancl, inclLrdirrg wells
tJsetl for {purpose)
Give Registration anrl Water Court Case Nuntbers
L)escriptiorr of larrd orr whiclr used
(13) TI.IE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S} TI.IAT T1{E INFORMATION SET FONTl.I IIEREON IS
rRUE ro rHE BE: t ot l!]s !(NowLEDGE.
Use acltlitronal slreets of paper if rrrore space is retltrirecl
.4qs\eYKru tir ctv t
n[cEt\/[b
JUII1 Z'lB
l?ATrR nr8ouBc{t
6I lE Eti0e6B
ffdl,
A tract of lancl situate in Lot t, SeuLj-on 35,'Iownship 7 Sout]r, Ranga
BB l{est of the Sixt}r Principal Meridian described as beginning aL apoint on the Nortlr Line of saicl Lot B, (this point being the point
described in the land described j.n Recept.ion Number 22L153 in Book
348 at Page 437 of the records of :he Clerl< and Recorder of Garfield
Courtty,' Colorado) whence the \^litness Corner f or tlre South QuarterCornoi of saj.d Section 35 .boars S. 23o23'32" W. a distance of 2,856.6S
feet; thence S. 03o52' E. a distant:e of 83. S0 feet; thence S. 58o44 'E. a distance of 280.80 feet; thence S. 04o4I'W. a distance of 620.00
feet; tlrence ll. 73o05'L6 " W, a dls1-ance of- 381., 329 feeL; thence N.
00o36 ' E. a disbance of 739.138 fer:t to tire North line of said Lot Bt
Lhenco S. B9o0l" r43" E. a dlstance of L62,074 feet along ure North lihe
of said Lot B tO the point of beginning, Garfield Countfl Colorado.
Thit policy volid oniy if Scl ,rdulr I ir olloclre d.
tr I
//.,.
a"
ISOURCES
Sr.
lit,/
ftE0Hli,[D
MAY - 9 IOIU
Bqrs mm{nr*
t B*$ Egrc{
,AF Fl DAVIr ffiEL
-
.l 1l
V,IUI"'-' -
,PE OR
rll-r rN Bt Acx lcI.
-OPY OF ACCEPTED
ST A T EME }]T };1A IL E O
ON REQUE5T.
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER R
Bl8 Ccr'terrniol Blcry., l3l3 Slrerrnorr
D..nter, Col rrotlo 80203
sTArE OF COI_ORADO )
)ssCOUiITY OF _____Qar'l.Le1d_________ _ )
-----X-STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL U5E OF GROU}ID Y/ATER
AMEI'IDI,lENT OF EXIS IIIG RECORD
LATE REGISTRATION
",rA
P ERr,llT ).lur/B E R _99585_LOCAI IOIl Of: V/ELL.
f HE AFFIANT(S) _-Kaf her:ine I. _trtornlngs.far Cotary __Gar-.fje1_d_
vrhose moiling
oddress is --,gq1g-I006_-_- - -NE-----,- l, ot rt,c SE---- %. Sectio,, 15
citv.-_---carbondaler-.-oolorudt,^-;; .--816,23-- r*.p. J, --,o.*=, . tr"s. -88--- -,oy-.,.--9,9tr n rt
being duly sworn upon oollt, tleposes o,,d soys tlrot he (tl'ey) ,s (ore) the our,rer( s) of tlre vrell describe,J hereon; the v,ell is
locoled os described obo"e, ot dislorrces of
-?5t10-
feel {ronr,1," ,;$,g,}F\o;;;;r.".tion lirre ond --4B5,- leet [ronr lhe
,*Ti:*;,section line; vroler Irorrr tlris wefl vrc,s Iirst opplied to o beneliciol use Io, tlre purpose( s) described hereirr on llre
-doy o{
-.-Ju'ly
..- 19 .Zg; lhe rnoxirnunr suslrrirred pumping rolc o[ llre vrell is --[!-gollons pcr nrirrulc, llre punrpirtg
rte cloinred hereby is -- 15----- gollorrs per nrirrule; tlre tolol depth of tlre vrell is
-
3 f feel; llre overoge onnuol onrourrl
oI woler lo be diverled is - L, t ocre-feel; Io. *lriclr cloi'r, is I'creby,,,o<le lo, 4omgsti€,-use., ilc|lrdfuig=l-[p {rr-lga-
-E1.o-rr of rlot o\Ler-oo*rr"../of Jl:ilt;'"'i$l'll"'l't"n?\'{,"}3Y,1i%,, o[ rl,e to,rtJ o. *lrictr rtre vrorcr tror. rhis 'uell is 'se<J is
-1s,EB.--Sec. j5,J'ounsirJ-p--2, S. Rarrgp B[ U - - FulJ--l-egal-attacherl .-,--o[ '"l,ich
-ocres
ore irrigoled orrd wlrich is illuslroled on llre nrop orr llre reverse side of llris form; thol llris r'rell rvos cornpleted in
complionce vrith the pJrnrit opproved lhere[or; lhis slotenrenl o{ beneficiol use of ground woler is {iled in contpliorrce rvillr lovr; he
(they) hos (hove) reod tlre stoiernenls nro<.le hereon; krrows l[re conlerrt thereof; orri llrol lhe sonte ore true oI ltis (rheir) knowledge.
(cor,lLLETE RE-YERSE SIDE OF TlllS FORl,1)
s i s n o t u r e (, I ldi Lr*t, u',,,:: -$-\ a=-l ".r*r+S\
Tt-.'
Subscribecj on<J surorl t- l
to be{ore me on rlri , Jt-{- doy ol ->?-'14t4,'' , Wtl?
My Comnrission expir:s
-ZZ)
A-Zr. /, -' 'Y
FOR FILING BY TIIE STATE ENGINEER OF COI.ORADO
TO 1 t-tE FOLt_O\vtNG CONDtTtOl.rS:
FOR oFF ICE USE OIILY
( ou,t Core llo
Prior - l,{o , -.0o1 Y,
ll'ell lrje /
-
? (->'
1t,tr<,)$__ {}or,,,t,{o,, o;l
lSt^! )
ACCEPTET)
PURSI.JA}.IT
/,LX.''*- )--
-'--ii
r . e r t, u. t t<
DAI E I\YsrArE rl]6r|.lEER
Well drilled by -_Coll:l_ns_Drllllng Co.
P ernronerr'l
Pump irrstolletl by -- Co|flns_}alfang 0o" F.liJLrll.lns Lic. l{o
Lic. No.634
l'{e t er
Owner
wo,er
of lond orr whiclr
is being used __K A'r'lr
^
R r NLL
-_t:tQBN l NG$I'AR_
Tlris.diogrorrr represerris nirre (9) secrions Use rlre CEll TER SeUARE(orre seclion) lo irrdic<rte the locotion o{ tlre vrell, iI possible.
I
+-l t {I
-t
I
-l
NORtrr1 5E(
I
t
T loil L r/.rE
I
l-t
I-r
t
.L
rn(/)
--1
U]rIlr)
-:f
Luz. I
J
Z()
I
I
1 rs)
I
t-zrnI
1
FUtua
t-a)
IIJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
TI
I
I
SOUT,tI SEC
i'
--t_
totr L lI{E
I
I
T
I
I
-l
t.
E SCALE OF
+-
T ' 'o!,oo'' ti
*---l Ml
TWO IiICHES E'-t-
ile
-r
]UALS ONE-MI
_ ._l:_
E
_I
1-
WATER EQUIVALEI'lTS TABt-E (Roundtd Fieu.es)
An ocre-foot covers I ocre oI lond I foot deep.
i cubic [ool per second (cts) . . .449 gollons p,,r nrinute (gprn).
I ocre-foor . . 43,560 cubic feet . . 325.900 gollons.
1,000 gprn purrrped conlirruously for one <loy produces 4 4i <:cre.leet
100 gpm punrped conlinuously for one yeor produces .l60 ocre-feet.
TllE LOCATI0N OF TllE WELL l,luST BE StlolYN r.l'lD FOR LARGE CAPACITY lRRlcATloll Y/ELLS TllEAREA oll Wlllctl Tlll: WATER lS USED MUST BE stl\DED oR CRoSS.tiATCilED oN IilE DlAGRAt,l BELoy/.
r'loRTH
/
I
Ig
ffi
T-
+
(V{IIITE A}{D PI}II( COPY TO BE rILED Y/ITII TIIE STATE EI{GII.IEERPIIIK COPY WILL BE RETUR}IIED TO'OWi.IER)
t:
I
-1
__J'._'.-_
I
-l-
I
I
I
l-
I
:l-
I
From To
l1wnr.2o.,z_z ntcEIy[D
rHrs F'BM MUsr BE suBMrrrEt) coLoRADo DlVlSlor\ oF wATER RESOURCES i'
wrr,rN 60 DAys oF coMpLET.loN l0.l colLrnrl;irre E)l<Jg., lB4E Sherrnarr St. ^rv illG - 2,78
oF THE wor,{ DESCRTtsED lr,.nE. Dettver, ()olorado 80203 P .. rrrrro ---oN. rypE oR pRr,'r'r rN BLA'K wELL coMplETroN AND puMp rNsrALLATroN REponr l,/ ffil_ir,fftrrNK' pERMrr NUMBER -9-li-SgS- cuo.
,,/ J ( rS I I
wE L L owN E
^ -K+TLAK 1 p ., l- )Yl orrla7*fr e*-lu tr_ % or rr re _t/L _ L c:t sec, &*_
ADDRESSCLfu+hOruk ut.f*--(e-' r - -! --a--, R -?y- ht ,-h'L ,*/')-
DArE coMpr-ErED -€ - ---1-:e-- ,'rc\/ noLE DTAMETER
:7 ir,. t,,t^t -.C)- ,u -Z l r,.
,-
-
irr. frorn -.., _ to ,--._____ ft.
irr. f ront to __. f t.
){
/as
CASING REpORD: Plain Casing
sir" 6*& kinrl J l!-_ front ()
- to ?* rt.
Size
--*
& kind frorn ___ to -- ft.
Size
-
& kinci __ _,_ f ronr to ==- f t.
si," -|il'a rin,r :;l*:rli,,' et - to -3-s. 1
GROUTING RECOND
Materiat -- Q<*=-,/--
Irrtervals - 14::2c;
PlacernerrtMethocl 42lL--
Type arrd Color of Material
3{'6 H-..s 2t/d9*tL/.
t) -'rToTnL DEPTil €, +
Size
-
& kirrd
Size -- & kind
__ to
--
to
.*-ft.
=__- f t.
G NAVE L
I n terval
PACK: Size
TEST DATA
Date l.estecj
-
7- )--rc'ar
.A'r/
Static Water Level Prior to Tesr *_*/___==_=.-- f t.
Type of Test Purnp --bAJ-
Lerrgtlr of Test
---A-i
nS=-
Srrstainecl Yielcl (Mete r"rll
-?d
6ZA-
WEI.L LOG
Llse additiorral lrages rrecessary to corrrpleto log [:ittal ['Llnlrirrg Water Lcvel
--
/-a-
PuMd rt!srn LLn r roN ItEPorl r
.rrrp Make - Q*r-l-L *
'owered rr, ---r.' ,A ? o / ,, 'f-
)urnp Serial itlo.
Viotor Serial No.
)ate I nstalled
)urnp lntake De1;tlt
ta!- 3-t a-:ft
le marks
WA
fro
1
-TE R
BLE
coilE oF
DEPRE 3 SIOII
VELL TEST DATA WITII PENMANENI'PUMI'
r!
Y
E
;l-
TF(L
It-
o.
tdo
)
t-ot-
)ate Testect -- -1-tel - 7 {
:itatic Water Level to Test b'
rstlr of Test --_'---- A
'justainec.l yielcl (Meter eal- 3€- -
I lour s
GPM
rumping Water Level /)'
R e rnarlcs
CONTNACTORS STATEMEIIT
-fhe undersigrred, being duly sworrr upon oath, deposes and says that lre is tlre contractor of the wellor
pump installatir:rr described lrereorr; that ]re has read the staternent rrrade hereon; krrows llte conterrt
'r1
State crf Colorado, Corrnry o1 0a., /;J-{
-
Sulrscribed anri sworn to beiore me ttrisl-! clay of -* JtLly- , rc 7d/
Licerrse Nr.6,?{
SS
My cornnris,,rn yr,l"r, - -rlr/*q--- , $?-o-
Notary Priblic. KW/Cttt*" _--1_-1-r Q_<J_a +=._-
Wl llTE AND GIIEt:N copi,:s nrust lro tiltd vritlr llre Sr;rre Eogi,rr:rl PtNl( COPY is
copy o, botlr si<los o,',t ,ffia. I
arr<l YEl.lOW COPY is lor llre [)riller
I
1
\\-.-- -\----\\\\ \
thereof, arrrl that tlte
Signatur e
/\liliJl)A\/l'l'
si I'A't'ti ()r Cot.otl.n IJo
cloLJN'l'\' OIr (iA l(FI Ijl_D
I, Cieotge I(ilby state tlrc follorvirrg o['rrry lrersorral krrurvlerlge arrrl r1y fi.ee rvill:
I altt lltc owllel'of tlre Pt'ttpctty rvlriclr is tlrc srrlrjcct oItlrc rvcll pcrrrrit lpplicltisps lirr (lrc
N4alrfly Benrl Ilarrclr I,orrrl Nrs. I irrrrt 2, att^clrctl lreretr.
I t'cvicrvetl tltc locatiorts of existirrg rvells rvitlrirr 6(X) t'cct o['nry proltcrty. Irr,.rticrrl,r
lrct'trrit no'()958fis locittctl olt lrtopct.ty urvncrl by Alzrirr Lar,:rl. lt is actrrllll, Irrcirtc<l irs
slto'"vtt ott llte attaclretl rttay wlriclr is aborr[ 1000 f'cct at tlrc closcsl poirrl lo llrc NIirl,f 11,
Relrrl Ilanclr [)olrrls.
J'lrere al'e Ilo rvells rvitlrirr 600 lcct of tlrc i\,laylly Ilcrrrl I,orrrls I arrrl 2. 'l'lre rreu,rvell
rlrilletl lry thc ILoal'ilrg Irorl< l'tesclvc rrrrrlcrrvcll pcrrrril No.Z29g32 is rrrer.c llyrrr 600 lect
ftorrr tlre erlge of (lre Plolloscrl Mayfly Ilcntl I,orrtls Nos. I anrl 2.
'l'lre I\4ayfly llcrrtl I(anclt I'otttl Nos. I irrrrl 2 (tlrc rvclls) rvlriclr irrc tlre sulricct o[-llrc
irPplicatiorrs I rcviervc<l irre rrot arc rvitlurr 6(X) I'cct oI arry otlrcr cxisting rvcll ilr tlrc ficlrl.
I? tt t I lr cr a [-{i ant s a1,ct lr rrn t.
-t--"./-) -t
-</ . -"
cot_ot{AIx)
( '( ) t II'l'l'\' ( )lr ( iz\ I(lrlLLI )
)
)ss
)
WI'l'NIiSiS
anil srvonl to lrefrrre rrre tlris l2th rlt.'1of Jarnrary, zo)l, by (ieorgc I(ilby
IIry llan(l and of flciirl seal. ivly L-urrrurissiorr cxpires:
Notrrry I'rrtrlic
I(ilby affitlavit
I
').
.. t' .(,
I.)
\ l)
l.)
( )l
( ';. ,, . ,.,,, t tt 1
j
,,i).
.: .' ,l
:"; 'l
'I
1rl,:l: ,.1
,' ll
I
I
I
.li,I
i
I
I
,ti\\ I.
rlt;,',,1 ,., \; . t,,.r ,;?.,\i. ,
"'.:,t lj It (i \
' ,,,1
;rIt I,7; l)).r f; t'l ( ) ''// | j \tlil
t.', \)l,!l:.,1 r l,
t,'i't r' ;t . ,
,,]'
I
i,l
I
,l/
i'
rl
l
'-il
.(r)
. (,1
't
,i
I
-r. ,.1 t:
=t,l l
lirl
l
:I ll
)i;
I 'l
It
)ili1
*i,
'I
I
I
.:?
' )') Jii.' .. - (''\'' '.]' i.' i'..o\i'
:*i ilrl \*,,,I \,' '
I nN
;l
'
,{[
;
I
L
I' ;' -.I '\
lI (, rI r )r
I!;,t. t,,rir
;;
, tllili;itit .,' ," ,,i,,
liilll'"
""
11;,'ll\i.
\r
:l
,l
I
t
I
ilt,
,l,t
)'l!l
,' ,'1,
l"t't')l j :\
:
ll
.)
\,
i
i'
:
I
I
I
I
::
j
t,'i i'
I
I
I
(;l
ii'[;r,i',
l_
I
Date: l/25/Ol 6:,02:25 PM Central- Standard Time<BR>
From: garcoplnGrof.net (Garfield County CO)<BR>
To: EarIeYKlGaol . com(BR)
George :
After talking to the county Attorney, we both agree that there
need to go to the extent proposed in Condition #7 - since this is not
is
a
corunon element for ownership by the HoA, we should just deal with this
fifth lot and not put any unenforceable restrictions on it. It will be
i-mpossible for the County to reatly impose any conditions on what is really a
"fiee market" lot that can be sol-d next year if you chose to do so'
As to the barn and rental of stal1s, if there is no indoor arena
person cannot rent a horse, it 1s just a barn'
The lot woufd be allowed to have a single dwelling, either attached or
detached. The tot wil-I have to have it's own water supply (weII). The use of
t.hepropertywouldbeentirelyuptoyouoranyfutureowner'
You wilf still- need to create the access easement from your adjoining
property and declare it to be an emergency egress easement for al-1 of the Mayfly
Bend lot owners.
I will talk to Kit about this tomorrow, so she is familiar with the
issues.
Mark Bean
no real
true
Iot as a
and
EXHIBIT D
fr
e_-*,
Daniel E. Hardin, P.
DEI{/ksw
January 22,2001
George R. Kilby
505 Sandy Lane
Anniston, Alabama 36201 Job No. 100 412
Subject:Clarification Regarding I{ydrology Recommendation, Preliminary
Geotechnical Study, Mayfly Bend Ranch. East of CarbonrJale, Gartield
County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Kilby:
As requested, we are clariffing a statement in our previous report regarding potential
flooding at the subject site. On page 2 of our report in the Geologir: Conditiorts section,
the third sentence reads " A hydrologist should evaluate the flooding potential at the
site." Our intent was to notiS the client that the property could be impacted by
flooding. While a hydrologist could do this evaluation, it was not our intent to restrict
the work to only a hydrologist. As an alternative, the sentence could have read, " A
civil engineer experienced with surface water hydrology should evaluate the flooding
potential at the site.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTIT - PAWLAK L INC.
I lr:1trt rtt-tlt-l';trr lll. ( icotct ltrlic:rl. I ltc.
5(11(l ('ourr{1 llrrarl l5-l
(ilettrtootl Sgllings. ('okrrrttlo 6l{rtlI
l'ltrrrtc: 97{}.9J5-79lJtl
l,ax: 97()-9J5-ti{5-l
hpge o(t ltltge olt't'lt.t'ottt
i- 144+3 i
A,ffiS
cc: Sopris Engineering - Attn: Yancy Nichol
EXHIBIT E
LAW
ROBERT B
OFFICES
EMERSON PC
.rHIRO STRETI
coLoRAOO e1623
a6 50urH
CARBONCALE
eopp
19701 963 3?oc
FAx (97o) e63 oges
RCE|ERT E EMERSON
\lzrrch 5. 2001
\4r. Mark Bean
Direcror
Garfield Counry Planning Department
109 Eighth Strcct, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Roaring Fork Preserv'e Subdivision/Maytly Bend Ranch Subdtvisron
Dear Mark:
I am rvnting this letter to let you knorv that my client, Roaring Fork Preserve, LLC, ts in
thc proccss-of negotiating a joint road aSreement r*'rth the owners of Mayfly Bcnd Ranch'
The roarl will be .onrt*it"d rn the location shown on the respective plats of these
subdivisions and the old easement will be vacated. The road agreement that we arc
negouaung will include a methodologv for shanng costs of constructton and
muintenunce. i expect that this wili be finalized rn the near future'
If 1'ou have any quesdons, please let me know'
Sinccrclr',
Robcrt B. Emerson
RBE,/r.1.1
Dave McMorris
John Dresser
Ron Liston
ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this
-
day of ,2001, by and between
George R. Kilby, Farley S. Kilby, loint tenants (hereinafter "KILBY"), Mayfly Bend Ranch
(herelnafter "MbR"; and Roaring Fork Preserve, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company (hereinafter "RFP").
RECITALS
1. Mayfly Bend Ranch is a proposed subdivision in Garfield County consisting of five (5)
residential lots. KILBY will retain ownership of one of these Lots, known as the Barn Lot
and KILBy also owns a lot adjacent to Mayfly Bend Ranch known as Day Subdivision
Lot No. 3. KILBY will utilize the contemplated common road to access these Lots
through RFP and Mayfly Bend Ranch from County Road 100'
2. Roaring Fork Preserve is a proposed subdivision in Garfield County consisting of nine
(g) lots *[i"f, will be marketed for construction of single family dwellings and additional
lots or areas within existing lots that will contain Accessory Dwelling Units ("ADU") and
all these lots or areas witl utitize a portion of a common road contemplated by KILBY
and RFP for access to the subdivision from County Road 100.
3. KILBY and RFP have reached the following agreement with respect to sharing the
costs of constructing that portion of the proposed road that is used in common and the
future costs of repair and maintenance of that portion of the proposed access road that
is used in common. Based on Recitals 1 and 2 above, KILBY and RFP have agreed to
share the expense for common use facilities on a ratio of 9/14ths for RFP and 5/14ths
for MBR.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and agreemelE_
contained herein, the sufficiency and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, RFP
and KILBY agree as follows:
1 . ROAD LOCATION. That the section of the access road that will be used in
co@KlLBYisparticularlydescribedinEXHlBlT"A',(hereinafter
"Road") which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Road is
referenced in the subdivision Preliminary Plan Application filed with Garfield
County by KILBY as Mayfly Drive but a final name for said Road is yet to be
determined. RFP has identified this same section of Road in their Preliminary
Plan Application as "Road A" and Mayfly Bend Ranch has identified this section
of road as Mayfly Drive in its Preliminary Plan Application but such identities for
said road are pretiminary only and are not for construction. One flnal construction
document identifying said road is anticipated and both Mayfly Bend Ranch and
RFP anticipate additional roads within each subdivision, but these additional
roads are not part of this Agreement. Only the common section of the access
road from County Road 100 is subject to the terms of this Agreement. This
common section of roadway that will utilized by both MBR and RFP is described
as the portion of Road A in ihe Preliminary Plan Application submitted by RFP to
Garfield County beginning at the intersection of Road A with County Road 100
and continuing for ippro*imately 1300 feet to the intersection of Road A and
Road C in thsPreliminary Plan Application, at such point the roadway is no
longer a common roadway but a roadway that shall be for the exclusive use of
MBR. A map depicting the location of the roadways within RFP is attached and
made a part hereof as EXHIBIT '8".
2. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS. KILBY and RFP agree that each
subdivision shail have a Homeowners Association created to administer and
manage the affairs of each subdivision and that upon the formation of
Homebwners Associations for each subdivision that each such Association shall
be bound by the terms of this Agreement.
3. COST SHARING. KILBY and RFP wish to share the cost of constructing that
portion of ne norO that is used in common according to the following formula:
A) The roadway to be constructed shall be a twenty-two (22) foot wide,
chip and seal surfaced road constructed according to the road standards
contained in the Garfield County Code. lf RFP or MBR determine that it is
desirable to upgrade the roadway surface, they agree to negotiate in good
faith with the other with respect to sharing this increased cost of
constructing the roadwaY.
B) RFP may construct all the roadways within its subdivision under one
contract and in that event MBR will contribute an amount equal to sixteen
and g2t100ths (16.92%) percent of the cost of said contract. RFP shall be
responsible for the balance of the roadway construction contract. This
division of cost is based on finished road surface in an estimate prepared
by sopris Engineering on May 2,2OO1and may be changed by mutual
agreement between RFP and MBR.
C) MBR will construct all the roadways within its subdivision and will also
construct that section of Road A from the intersection of Road A with Road
C to the property boundary of MBR and is not considered a common road.
D) MBR AND RFP recognize that the opportunity to provide road
foundational materials from their respective lands may present itself and
agree that if material such as pit run is provided rom their respective lands
tnlt tne party providing such materials shall be entitled to a credit towards
the reduced expense in constructing the roadway.
E) MBR and RFP understand that utility installation is to occur in
conjunction with the construction of the roadway and agree that RFP may
coniract for the installation of utilities and in that event MBR will contribute
an amount equal to thirteen and 81/100ths (13.81%) percent of the cost of
said contract for all utility installation that is used to supply MBR. This
division of cost is based on trenching lengths for utilities in an estimate
prepared by Sopris Engineering on May 2,2001and may be changed by
mutual agreement of MBR and RFP. MBR calls attention to the fact the
electric, telephone and cable may be supplied from the existing service in
place on MBR property.
F) RFP and MBR have to date incurred engineering and road design
expenses related to the preparation of their respective subdivision
applications and agree that these expenses are not part of the "common
road" expenses and that each party shall bear these expenses
individually. RFP has incurred some additional engineering expenses such
as surveying and marking the centerline of the common roadway and
upon mutual agreement, these expenses shall be included in the
expenses for the "common road".
4. METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ROAD MAINTENANCE COSTS. After the Road
is constructed to the final specifications, the obligation to pay the proportionate
share of the repair and maintenance costs, as allocated above, shall be the
responsibility of and shall be paid by the Homeowners Association for each
subdivision. Once the respective Homeowners Associations are formed a new
Road Maintenance Agreement between the Associations will be executed to
insure the binding effect of the agreement to share costs.
5. METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ROAD CONSTRUCT]ON COSTS. ThE COSTS Of
construction of the anticipated common use road shall be shared according to
the pro rata allocation above. Any construction of a temporary nature will also be
shared by RFP and MBR according to the same pro rata allocation so long as
such construction meets the applicable Garfield County Road Standards and is
incorporated in the flnal construction. Temporary construction costs shall be
properly documented in order to be considered for reimbursement. RFP and
MBR agree to jointly determine the contractor to construct said roadway. Neither
MBR nor RFP can unilaterally contract for road construction. ln the event that the
RFP and MBR can not agree on a contractor, said road construction shall be put
to bid with the lowest bid for construction of a roadway that meets all Garfield
County standards being selected to construct the roadway. All payments shall be
made promptly in the proportions indicated above, when invoiced by the
contractor engaged to construct the Road.
6. MANNER OF ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE MAINTENANCE COSTS. PTiOT tO
Uay St Ouring each year of the term of this Agreement, the Presidents, or such
other representatives as may be designated in writing, of each Homeowners
Association which is a party hereto, shall meet and confer with respect to items
of routine repair and maintenance of the Road which may be expected in the
succeeding twelve (12) months. Upon the agreement of such representatives,
each Homeowners Association shall within twenty (20) days, pay to a joint road
maintenance fund the total amount due from each Association, which shall be
equal in amount to the cumulative amount allocated in accordance with this
Agreement or any succeeding agreement. Upon reaching such an agreement,
the representatives shall designate one of them to negotiate and enter into such
contracts for services with third parties as are appropriate to cause the
anticipated repair and maintenance to be accomplished. The costs for such
services shall then be paid from the sums deposited into the road maintenance
fund by the parties hereto.
ln the event that the representatives of the Associations are unable to reach
agreement with respect to items of repair and maintenance and allocations
therefor, the road maintenance allocation for each subdivision shall remain the
same as said allocation for the preceding year and the amount due from each
Association shall be the same as in the preceding year. ln the event of such a
disagreement, prior to May 3'1 of the following year a quorum of each
Association's Board of Directors shall meet to resolve the disagreement for that
succeeding year. ln the event such a meeting fails to reach agreement the matter
shall be submitted to mediation and the decision of such a mediator shall be
binding. The costs of a mediator shall be borne equally by each Association.
Each Homeowners Association shall have the right to undertake emergency
repair and maintenance and have the authority to contract and pay for
emergency repairs by following the same procedures as those set forth for
routine repair and maintenance.
7. COMPLETE AGREEMENT: AMENDMENT. This Agreement constitutes the
entire and complete agreement of MBR, RFP and KILBY in regard to the subject
matter herein. No promise or undertaking has been made by any party, and no
understanding exists with respect to the transaction herein contemplated, except
By:
as expressly set forth herein. All prior and contemporaneous negotiations and
understandings between the parties are embodied and merged into this
Agreement. Any modification or amendment must be in a written form and
executed in the same manner as this Agreement.
g. ATTORNEYS', FEES. COSTS. ln the event that litigation is necessary to
entorce -any prwisions of ttris Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit actually incurred in such litigation.
g. COUNTERPARTS. This Road Easement Relocation Agreement may be
executed in duplicate original counterparts, each of which shall constitute an
original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document-
10. PARAGRAPH HEADTNGS AND UNDERLINING. The paragraph headings
anO unOertininguithin this instrument are for convenience only and shall not be
construed to be a specific part of the provisions contained herein.
11. SEVERABILITY. Should any part or parts of this Agreement be declared
lnvatid or unentorceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.
12. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Colorado. The parties agree that the proper venue is Garfield County
and the District Court in Garfield County shall be the exclusive venue for any
dispute arising out of the Agreement.
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, KILBY and RFP have caused this Road Easement
Relocation Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written.
Signatures follow.
ROARTNG FORK PRESERVE, LLC, a Colorado Iimited liability company ("RFP")
David S. McMorris, Manager
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
)
)
) ss:
Acknowledged, subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
2001, by Divid S. McMorris, as Manager of Roaring Fork Preserve, LLC, a Colorado
limited liability company.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
My Commission expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC
GEORGE R. KILBY AND FARLEY S. KILBY, joint tenants, and MAYFLY BEND
RANCH ("K|LBY")
Farley S. Kilby George R. Kilby
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
)
)
) ss:
Acknowledged, subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
2001, by George R. Kilby and Farley S. Kilby, joint tenants.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL,
My Commission expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC
ilElEIu"
A60 OO FOOTWIDE STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN GOV'T LOT 15, SECTION 36
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID EASEMENT LYING 3O.OO
FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
COMMENCING AT THE WITNESS CORNER TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, THENCE NORTH 86 degrees 15 minutes 37 seconds EAST
3114.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY
ROAD NO 1OO, THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 01 degree 55 minutes 13 seconds WEST ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE 62.67 FEET, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25O.OO FEET
AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds, A DISTANCE OF
242.15 FEET (CHORD BEARS NORTH 26 degrees 25 minutes 28 seconds EAST
232.80 FEET), THENCE CONTINUTNG ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 54
degrees 10 minutes 23 seconds EAST 30.62 FEET, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG
SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37 degrees 08 minutes 30
seconds, A DISTANCE OF 162.06 FEET (CHORD BEARS NORTH 35 degrees 36
minutes 08 seconds EAST 159.24 FEET), THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE NORTH 17 degrees 01 MINUTE 53 seconds EAST 66.61 FEET,
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 3OO.OO FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
23 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds, A DISTANCE OF 123.05 FEET (CHORD BEARS
NORTH 28 degrees 46 minutes 53 seconds EAST 122.18 FEET), THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 40 degrees 31 minutes 52
seconds EAST 215.98 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2OO.OO FEET
AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67 degrees 19 minutes 45 seconds, A DISTANCE OF
235.02 FEET (CHORD BEARS NORTH 06 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds EAST
221.73 FEET), THENCE CONTTNUTNG ALONG SAtD CENTERLTNE NORTH 26
degrees 47 minutes 53 seconds WEST 332.11 FEET, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG
SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2l degrees 24 minutes 54
seconds, A DISTANCE OF 149.51 FEET (CHORD BEARS NORTH 37 degrees 30
minutes 20 seconds WEST 148 64 FEET), THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE NORTH 48 degrees 12 minutes 47 seconds WEST 44 04 FEET,
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1OO.OO FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
18 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds, A DISTANCE OF 31.94 FEET (CHORD BEARS
NORTH 39 degrees 03 minutes 43 seconds WEST 31.81 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, THE TERMINUS, WHENCE THE WITNESS
CORNER TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 BEARS
SOUTH 63 degrees 21 minutes 22 seconds WEST 3668.54 FEET.
cAl-otl & HouPT, P.C.
A'I'IORNEYS r\'I LAW
SIIERRY A. CALOIA
JEFFERSON V. IIOUP'T
BARBARA P. KOZELKA
MARK E. IIAMIL'TON
I2O4 Gfu\ND AVENUE
CiLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8160I
(970) 945-6067 - VOICE
,!.'70) 945-6292 - FACSIMILE
PLectse direct corresportdertce lo tltis oddress
PARK AVENUE, PROFESSIONAI- BLDG.
I2I NORTI1 PARK AVE., SUITE B
IUON'TROSE, COI-ORADO 8I402
(970) 252-0180 - VolcE
S ende r's ennil : sco loi a @.sop ri s. trct
April 13,2001
I(it Lyon
Garfi eld CounLy PIanr-ring Deveioptnetrt
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Gleurvood Spriugs, CO 81601
Re: t|latlly BerulRunch Subtlit'isiort/Fittal Doctrrttertts
Dear Kit:
Earlier toclay I clelivereci to Kathy of your office 4 sets of drawirlgs to replace the 4 sets
sLrbpritted to you with the prelin-rinary plat amendntent clocutnents. These replacenietlt lnaps
sliow the location of the emergency access onto the Roaring Fork Preserve property' 'l'his
ernergeucy ilccess route r,vas coordinated rvith the Roarirtg Fork Preserve's etrgitreer and we both
ogr.Jn, io rts iocation anct use. I am hopefitl that with this new erxergency access ancl these
replacetrrent tuaps everythirlg is now itr orcler.
I wor-rlcl like to get the first av:rilable date for hearitrg belore the Board of Coutltv
Comurissiouers. Please call my office to let lne ktlow oItliat clate.
Please call if you have atty clLtestiotls
S ittcct'clv.
clALolA & I'lotlP.f. I'.c].
,,)/ t 2..) /// ,,// i r' L ,/l' (' ,'- ( y''7 --/J t t--.- '-2 c('sherry A. ( dl6irr
SACI:nli
Enclosttre s
cc: George Kilby
I(l I-tJ\'-l t rrtt-tt-2
Supplemental Information and Amendments
Submitted to the Garfield County Planning Department
And
Garfield County Board of County Commissioners
September 10,2001
The information contained in this section is pursuant to issues raised at the BoCC hearing
on July 9,2001which was continued to September 10, 2001. The information was
delivered to the Planning Department Staffon August 10, 2001 and August 15, 2001'
The submission on August 1Oft consisted of a letter from the applicants' attorney, Mr.
Jim Larson, suggesting l3 Conditions of Approval with supporting informatioU and the
submission on August l5th was engineering documentation submitted by Sopris
Engineering,LLC responding to the engineering review of 611310l by Assistant County
Engineer, JeffNelson.
Some of these documents were duplicated in the two submissions, and in that event only
one copy is submitted herewith. As directed by Staffall of the new documentation
submitted for the September 10, 2001 BoCC hearing is included under this date tab,
notwithstanding notations to the contrary in the Engineering submission.
Documents submitted on August 10,2001
Compilation Note: The following letter dated August 10, 2001, from James M. Larson,
applicants' Attorney, to Kit Lyon, Senior Planner references attachments, and these notes
direct the reader to their location within this binder.
1. "Analysis of scour potential on MBR Lot 3 by Robert J. O'Brien of AquaTerra
Services, LLC dated August 8, 2001." This document consists of six (6) pages
and is also referenced and included in the submission of August 15ft by Sopris
Engineering LLC. The document is included in this binder with the engineering
documents submitted on 8/15/01.
"Wetlands and setback assessment letter dated August 8, 2001 prepared by Gary
Beach of Beach Environmental LLC" is attached to this letter and submitted
pursuant to proposed Condition of Approval No. 5.
*DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS including more specific
language on vegetation and Revegetation, and who has responsibility therefor."
This document consists oftwenty (20) pages and replaces the Covenants
document submitted on March 9,2001that contained 17 pages. The current
document is found under this date tab, although the previous document remains in
Appendix I, Covenants for reference.
"Memorandum of understanding in the form of two letters regarding joint
construction, easementing and dedication of roadways to serve MBR and the
adjacent Roaring Fork Preserve, dated July I I and 17,2001." The document
delivered on 8/10/01 was preliminary in that it was not executed by the RFP. The
document submitted herewith has been executed by both parties and is attached to
this letter.
"Revegetation labeling of pertinent section from Vegetation Management Plan for
Mayfly Bend Ranch SuMivision previously prepared by Beach Environmental
LLC." This document consists of six (6) pages and is attached to this letter. The
revision to this document is found on page 5 where the heading Revesetation of
Site is added to identiff this section of the plan.
2.
4.
5.
IAITIES M. LARSON
a Professional Corporation
ATTORNEYATI,AW
Telephone : 97 0 -9 45 -9 45 6 P46simirs; 97 0876,- O to 5
P.O. Box 272 . Glenwood Springs, C0 81602
August 1O, 2OO1
KIT LYON, Senior Planner
Garfield county planning department
1og 8'h St, Suite 3o3
Glenwood Spgs CO 81601
COPY
MAYFLY BEND RANCH SUBDIVISION
Dear Ms. Lyon:
Following my letter to you of July 16, 2OO1 the applicant has been
working on the matters needing addressing. We are proposing the
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL set forth on the 2-page enclosure. We
hope you are able to support the BOCC approval of the development
with those CONDITIONS.
The CONDITIONS do not cover matters rruhich at one time \Nere
raised, but urhich have been included in the Covenants or as plat
notes. Some matters are not covered because they are no longer
germane to the development [barn lot deed restrictions, eg].
ln support of the proposed CONDITIONS we are including for your
consideration the following information which has been developed
and updated subsequent to the July 9, 2OO1 BOCC hdaring:
Analysis of scour potential on MBR Lot 3 by RobertJ. O'Brien
of AquaTerra Services, LLC dated August 8, 2OOl
Wetlands and setback assessment letter dated August 9,
2OO1 prepared by Gary Beach Environmental LLC
DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS including
more specific language on vegetation and revegetation,
and urho has responsibility therefor
Memorandum of understanding in the form of two letters
regarding joint construction, easementing and dedication
of roadways to serve MBR and the adjacent Roaring Fork
Preserve, dated July 1 1 and 17, 2OO1
KIT LYON, senior planner - Page 2
August 1O, 2OO1
Revegetation labeling of pertinent section from Vegetation
Management Plan for Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision
previously prepared by Beach Environmental LLC
We also will bring a preliminary plan plat map in process of revision
for our working purposes at our next scheduled meeting on the
project at 1 O am on Friday, August 1O, 2OO1 at the Henry Building in
Rifle.
Thank you for your attention.
Yours very truly,
Odr,,,,-/|/ V',,-r,-
JAMES,$. **=o*
pcs: George and Farley Kilby
Whit Kilby, project manager
Sherry Caloia, esq.
John Dresser, esq
Sopris Engineering - LLC
Staff recommends Board of County Commissioner approvat of Mayfly Bend
Ranch subdivision (MBR) preliminary plan, with the following 13 condiUons:
1. All representations of the applicant made in the application and
at the hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board of county
commissioners shall be considered conditions of approval, unless approved
otherwise by the Board.
2. The recommendations of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnicat shatt
be followed. Site-specific studies shall be conducted for individual lot
development. On Lot 3, a qualified expert shall be consulted for building
footprint location, foundation design and any scour mitigation that is
warranted. The need for site-specific studies shall be disclosed in the
covenants and on the final plat in the form of a pLAT NorE.
3. Without exception, all proposed roads shall be built to Garfield
county subdivision standards.
4. Prior to final plat approval, applicant will submit documentation
in the form of easements and dedicated public roads, acceptable to the
county attorney, that MBR has provided appropriate, required, public
access from county Road 100 AND appropriate, required, emergency
access seruing MBR.
5. Wetland/riparian areas adjacent to building envelopes shall be
mapped to enable setback determination by Beach Environmental. Prior to
final plat approval, all building envelopes shall be certified by Beach
Environmental as being consistent with the recommendations of Beach
Environmental.
6. The Subdivision Improvemenb Agreement (SIA) shall include a
revegetation provision for the areas disturbed by the improvements for the
subdivision, and a security guarantee that the revegetation has been
successful.
7. Accessory dwelling units are not approved as part of this
subdivision review.
8. Impact fees shall be paid to the C.arbondale and Rural Fire
Protection District prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall adhere to
the recommendations of the CRFPD.
9. Applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the
Colorado Division of Water Resources. Prior to approval of final plat, an
individual well for each lot shall be drilled and meet the following criteria:
a. A well completion report shal! be issued including the
depth of the well, the characteristics of the aquifer and the static water
level.
b. A four (4) hour pump test shall be performed on the well
before use, and the results including pumping rate (in GPM) and
information showing the drawdown and recharge shall be obtained.
c. A written opinion of the testing agency shall be obtained
that the well should be adequate to supply water to the proposed lot based
on an assumption of 3.5 persons per dwelling and an usage of 100 gallons
of water per person, per day.d. Before using the well the water quality shall be tested by
an independent laboratory and shall meet State of Colorado guidelines
concernlng bacteria and nitrates.
10. Individual sewage disposal systems shall be engineered by a
registered professional engineer within the State of Colorado and
maintained adequately.
11. The restricted deed for the Open Space parcel shall be included
in the final plat submittal with the SIA.
LZ. The Articles of Incorporation of Mayfly Bend Ranch HOA shall
be filed at or before the time the final plat is recorded.
13. All utilities to be installed shall be buried.
T0: 976 945 13EB P.ZEE./UEB
rl
Beach Environmental, LLC
August 9,2001
Ceorge Kilby
Mayfly Rsnch
505 Shady Lauc
Anniston, Alabama 16207
Re: Wetlands Delineation
Dear George:
At your rcqucst, I havc re-staked the wetland bouncLries along Mayfly Ranch lots 3 &
4. Shorrly after completion, Sopris Engisssling commensed their survey of thc
deLineated wetlands boundaries and I undcrstsud thc oew mapping will he uvailable
soon. As statcd in prcvious corrcspondence, it is my opinion that proposed building
envelopes forlou 3 and 4 do not impact or cncroach upon any jurisclictional wetland.
Siuce sctbaqks from wetlands are intendcd to providc a vegetutive buft'er and the
vcgctatiou bcnvcen the wetlands aud the building enyelopqs varies I can assist you in
establishing it p,rudent sctback if rcquircd.
Plcase feel free to cull me with uny questions yotl may havc,
Sincerely,
m73br g3
cc: sopris En8.
,t5 w Mdn
Surc 30{
A{xn, COUIOI I
rd crro) 92t.J47t
f,u CZt trTta
ffi
{is-\: i il13592 P
Revision Note: The following revised DECLARATION OF COVENANTS was
submitted to the Planning Staffon 8/10/01 and was edited to include more specific
language referring to the Colorado Noxious Weed Act and Garfield Weed Management
Plan. This revised language was added in Article VI, paragraph I l. Common Areas.
Open Space. Revegetation and Weed Management. The amended language begins at the
bottom of page 12 arrd continues to the end of the paragraph on page 13. This is the only
change to the text of this document, but because it was edited and printed with different
computer software and used a slightly larger font, this document now contains 20 pages
instead of the 17 pages in the previous edit.
In the course of making this text edit, certain other changes were made to correct
improperly numbered or lettered paragraphs. These revisions did not add or delete text,
and are described as follows:
In the previous edit on page 8, Article V, paragraph I l. Fencing had not been numbered
properly, and the correction resulted in a change in the paragraph numbers from that
point to the end of Article V.
In the previous edit on page 10, Article VI, paragraph E. Underground Utility Lines
should have been Paragraph 3. Underground Utility Lines. This change from letters to
numbers is continued to the end of Article VI.
As explained in the previous edit, Exhibits A through F are attached to these Covenants
by reference and are found at other locations in this binder. A sheet directing the reader
to these Exhibits is also attached to these Covenants following page20.
DECLARATION OF PROTEGTIVE COVENANTS FOR
MAYFLY BEND RANCH SUBDIVISION
THIS DECLAMTION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AND COMMON OWNERSHIP
pLAN is made this
-
day of_, 2001 by George R. Kilby and Farley S.
Kilby pursuant to and in accordance with the Colorado Common lnterest Ownership Act.
ARTICLE I
GENERAL PURPOSE OF COVENANTS,
SUBMISSION, DEFINED TERMS, DESCRIPTION
1. Purpose. These Covenants shall govern and be applicable to that certain real
property situated in Garfield County, Colorado known as Mayfly Bend Ranch
Subdivision, (hereinafter Subdivision or Mayfly Bend) as defined and described in the
Final Plat therefor recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County
as Reception No lt is the intention of George R. Kilby and Farley S. Kilby
(hereinafter Declarant) expressed by their execution of this instrument, that the lands
within Mayfly Bend be developed and maintained as a highly desirable scenic
equestrian, fishing and residential area that will continue to be a part of the surrounding
natural landscape. lt is the purpose of these covenants to preserve the open space,
wildlife habitat and the landscape that gives this area its present natural beauty and
preserve the character of the property in addition to the views and setting of the
Subdivision to the greatest extent possible, and the Lots therein shall always be
protected as much as possible with respect to uses, structures, landscaping and
general development as permitted by this instrument
2. Property Submission. Declarant hereby submits the real property described in
Exhibit A, together with all easements, rights of way, and appurtenances thereto and
any buildings, fixtures, and improvements thereon (hereinafter Property) to the
provisions of the Colorado Common lnterest Ownership Act (hereinafter Act) and to this
beclaration. ln the event the Act is repealed, the provisions of the Act on the effective
date of this Declaration shall remain applicable hereto. Declarant further declares that
the Property shall be held, leased, mortgaged or sold and conveyed subject to the
following terms, easements, reservations, restrictions, covenants and conditions.
Declarant further declares that this Declaration shall run with the land and shall be
binding upon all parties having any right, title or interest in the Property or any part
thereoi, their heirs, devisees, legal representatives, successors, and assigns and shall
inure to the benefit of each and every Owner.
3. Defined Terms. Each capitalized term not othenrrise defined in this
Declaration shall have the meaning specified or used in the Act.
4. Name of Common Interest Community. The name of the Common lnterest
Community is Mayfly Bend Ranch.
Page -1-
5. Tvpe of Common lnterest Community. The type of Common lnterest
Community is a planned community.
6. Association Name. The name of the Association is the Mayfly Bend Ranch
Homeowners Association a Colorado non-profit corporation (hereinafter Association or
HOA).
7. Property Location. The Propefi constituting the Common lnterest Community
is located in Garfield County, State of Colorado. Private property rights exist on
bordering properties and Mayfly Bend Lot Owners are cautioned not to trespass
thereon.
8. Property Description. The Property shall consist of five (5) residential Lots,
and one (1) common use open space Lot, all of which are more particularly described
on the Final Plat of Mayfly Bend Ranch. Lots 1 through 5 are designated'for
construction of single family residences according to the terms of this document. All
improvements will be restricted to building and landscape envelopes as shown on the
final plat map.
The common open space parcel will be approximately twenty-one (21) acres
in size and will be owned and maintained by the HOA. Uses of this parcel shall be
restricted to agricultural and other common uses that are described further in Article lll
of this declaration.
Lot 5 is designated as Lot 5 or the barn lot. A common barn facility may be
built on this lot and may be made available to the subdivision lot owners and others by
subsequent document. The Declarant may retain ownership of this lot and may build a
barn and related agricultural facilities which may be used to serve as a central facility for
continued agricultural use of the Barn Lot, the open space parcel and support for the
subdivision. This facility may include a dwelling space that may be used to employ a
residential property manger who will supervise agricultural activities on the open space
parcel and general management functions for the subdivision. The barn may include
other facilities for the Lot Owners use under the HOA provisions to enable the care and
sheltering of Owners horses as well as other common space for the Owners use.
Nothing herein shall restrict use of this lot as a residential lot.
L Lot Description. Lots 1 through 5 on this property are approved for
construction of a single-family dwelling. Lot Owners are advised, however, that any
dwelling structure, beyond a single family dwelling on a lot, must have the approval of
the apfropriate Garfield County authority and the Architectural Committee (AC) of the
Association. The Lot owners are advised that a portion of each lot is designated as
Easement (hereinafter LE) and the remainder of the lot is designated as Non-
Development Easement (hereinafter NDE). All construction and improvement will be
confined to the LE, except that a lot owner may put a water well or portion of a septic
field on the NDE portion of their lot if approved by the AC and Garfield County Authority.
A building Envelope (hereinafter BE) will be designated within the Landscape Envelope
and all dwelling space must be constructed within that area. The Association will
Page -2-
manage the NDE portions of all lots for farming, ranching and permitted common uses.
fne ruOg portion of these lots may be irrigated and fenced by the Association for
livestock control and farming purposes. The Association will be responsible for care
and maintenance of the NDE portions of all lots, and the cost will be borne by the
Association. Owners may also allow a portion of their LE to be fenced as described for
the NDE, and in that event the Association will care for that portion as though it were
NDE. The Association may construct a farming or ranching structure on the NDE
portion of a lot (beyond fencing or irrigation) but that lot owner may object if they
consider their privacy to be invaded by such construction. The provisions of this section
shall not apply to the Lot 5 or barn lot.
10. Recordinq Data. The recording data for all recorded easements and licenses
appurtenant to or included in the Common lnterest Community is set forth in Exhibit
@B@, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. ln addition, the Common
lnterest Community may be subject to the easements or licenses granted or reserved
pursuant to this Declaration.
ARTICLE II
OWNERS. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
1. Membership. All persons or other entities, including Declarant (hereinafter
referred to as Owners), who own or acquire the title in fee to any of the Lots in Mayfly
Bend by whatsoever means acquired shall automatically become members of Mayfly
Bend Ranch Homeowners Association a Colorado nonprofit corporation, in accordance
with the Articles of lncorporation of Mayfly Bend Ranch Homeowners Association, as
may be duly amended from time to time and which Articles and any amendments
theieto shali be filed with the Colorado Secretary of State and recorded in the real
estate records of the Garfield County, Colorado Clerk and Recorder. Any person,
combination of persons, entity or combination of entities and persons who own or
acquire title to any lot in Mayfly Bend shall only be entitled to one vote in the Mayfly
Bend Ranch Homeowners Association per Lot. The Articles of lncorporation shall be
filed at the time of Final Plat.
2. Purpose. The Association, through its Board of Directors, shall be authorized
and empowered to take each and every step necessary or convenient for the
implementation and enforcement of the Covenants contained in this Declaration The
Association shall have the right and responsibility to maintain, preserve, repair, insure
and othenruise protect and promote the interests of the Owners with respect to all
common properties and interests of the Owners and the Association. The Association
shall be governed by its Articles of lncorporation and Bylaws as may be amended from
time to time.
3. Board of Directors. The affairs of the Association shall be governed by a
Board of Directors consisting of three (3) members elected by the Owners.
Page -3-
4. Declarant Control. The Declarant shall have the reserved power, pursuant to
the Act, to appoint and remove officers and directors. This power of Declarant control
terminates no later than the earlier of a) sixty (60) days after conveyance of seventy-five
percent (75Yo) of the Lots to Owners other than the Declarant or b) two (2) years after
the last conveyance of a Lot by the Declarant in the ordinary course of business to an
Owner other than Declarant. The Declarant may voluntarily surrender the right to
appoint and remove officers and directors before one or the other of the above
conditions have been met but in such event Declarant may require
certain specified actions of the Association or Board of Directors as described in a
recorded instrument executed by the Declarant, be approved by the Declarant before
they become effective.
5. lndemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, each officer and director
of the Association shall be and is hereby indemnified by the Owners and the
Association against all expenses and liabilities, including attorneys fees, reasonably
incurred by or imposed upon them in any proceeding to which they may be a pafi, or in
which they may become involved, by reason of being or having been an officer or
director of the Association, or any settlements thereof, whether or not they are an officer
or director of the Association at the time such expenses are incurred, except in such
cases wherein such officer or director is adjudicated guilty of willful misfeasance or
malfeasance in the performance of his or her duties; provided that in the event of a
settlement the indemnification shall apply only when the Board of Directors approves
such settlement and reimbursement as being in the best interests of the Association.
6. Notice to Owners. Notice to an owner of matters affecting Mayfly Bend by the
Association or by another owner shall be sufficiently given if such notice is in writing and
is delivered personally, by courier, or by private service delivery or on the third business
day after deposit in the mails for registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, at
the address of record for real property tax assessment notices with respect to that
Owners Lot.
ARTICLE II!
EASEMENTS AND LICENSES
1. Lot Owners Easements. The purpose of extensive open space and common
elements in Mayfly Bend is to provide a working ranch character. Management of
Mayfly Bend Common Elements by the Association, shall conduct such operations such
as haying, irrigation, fencing, trail management, fishing habitat management and
pasturing of livestock. Any and all such activities are permitted on the Common
Elements of Mayfly Bend and the Non Development Easements (NDE) portions of the
Lots. The conduct of these activities will be at the discretion of the Ranch Manager with
direction from the Board of the Association and an Owners right to exclude such
activities from the NDE portion of their Lot shall not extend to these permitted activities.
Every Owner shall have the right of enjoyment and easement for access to their Lot
through or over the Common Elements, and such easement shall be appurtenant to
and shall pass with the title to every Lot, subject to the following provisions:
Page -4-
A. The right of the Association to promulgate and publish rules and
regulations which each Owner and their guests shall strictly comply.
B. The right of the Association to suspend the voting rights and rights to
use the Common Elements by any Owner for any period during which any assessment
against their Lot remains unpaid and for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days for any
infraction of its rules and regulations.
C. The right of the Association to grant easements, leases, licenses, and
concessions through or over the Common Elements.
D. The right of the Association to convey or subject a Common Element to
a Security lnterest in accordance with and to the extent permitted by the Act.
E. The right of the Association to close or limit the use of the Common
Elements while ranching, farming, maintaining, repairing, or replacing such Common
Elements.
F. Any Owner may delegate their right of enjoyment to the Common
Elements and facilities to the members of their family, their tenants, or guests who
reside on or rent their Lot.
G. The rights of the Association over the Common Elements pertaining to
farming and ranching, as described in this Article, shall also extend to the Non
Development Easement portions of the owner's lots. An owner may further extend to
the Association these rights over a portion of their Landscape Envelope, and in
exchange the Association shall care for this extended area in the same manner as the
Common Elements without cost to the owner. An owner may not prohibit construction
of any fencing required for livestock control on the NDE portion of their Lot.
ARTICLE IV
USE RESTRICTIONS
1. Permitted Uses. Only one (1) single-family dwelling, together with structures
appurtenant thereto, shall be constructed on any Lot in Mayfly Bend. The primary
dwelling must be located within the building envelope shown on the Final Plat.
2. Duplexes/Multi-Family Structures. Duplexes and multi-family structures are
strictly prohibited in Mayfly Bend.
3. Outbuildings. Owners will be permitted to build customary outbuildings on
their lots provided such construction is located within the area designated as landscape
envelope. All such improvements must comply with the Garfield County Zoning
Regulations, must have the required Garfield County permits and must have the
apfroval of the Architectural Committee of the HOA, as provided below. Owners are
reminded that all building, development, and other improvements, including owner
fencing and landscaping must be located within the landscape envelope and all dwelling
Page -5-
space must be within the building envelope designated for each lot. No outbuildings on
these Lots shall exceed 2,200 square feet in building footprint, exclusive of open
overhangs or open shed areas, nor be in excess of 25 feet in height. All building
heights shall be determined by measuring from the finished grade to the midpoint
between the eave and the peak of the roof of said building. Greenhouses shall be
permitted within the Subdivision, provided that they do not exceed 500 square feet.
Auxiliary buildings such as tool sheds, work areas, or auxiliary building shall not exceed
16 feet in height, and the like shall be permitted provided any individual outbuilding does
not exceed 1,000 square feet. No more than two such greenhouses and auxiliary
buildings shall be permitted. The design and location of all outbuildings shall be
approved by the Architectural Committee. The provisions of this section shall not apply
to the Lot 5 (the Barn Lot).
4. Modular/Mobile Homes. No modular, mobile, or manufactured homes shall be
constructed or placed within the Subdivision. This prohibition shall not apply to
construction trailers which shall be permitted for eighteen (18) months from the date of
commencement of construction, or until the issuance of a certificate of occupancy,
whichever first occurs provided, however, construction trailers may only be used for
construction, office, and storage purposes and shall not be occupied as a residence for
any period of time. All other trailer homes shall be prohibited. This restriction shall not
apply to agricultural structures or barns or to Declarant during such time as construction
on the Barn lot is in progress and until at least one of the residential Lots is sold and
occupied by an Owner other than the Declarant.
ARTICLE V
ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE AND REGULATIONS
1. Architectural Committee. The Architectural Committee (AC) shall be
composed of three (3) persons. Prior to Declarants sale of three (3) Lots in the
Subdivision. Declarant may appoint the members of the AC which may include officers
or directors of the Association, in Declarants sole discretion and the Board of Directors
of the Association shall have no authority to remove any member so appointed. Upon
sale of the last Lot in Mayfly Bend, or at an earlier time as determined by Declarant, the
members of the AC shall be appointed by the Board of Directors of the Association. The
persons serving on the AC shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors who
may remove a member of the AC, except a member appointed by Declarant, and
appoint a new member at any time, provided there shall at all times be at least three(3)
oersons servinq on the AC. The members of the Architectural Committee may also be
birectors of the"Association and need not be Owners. The Architectural Committee shall
have and exercise all the powers, duties, and responsibilities set out in this Declaration.
No improvements of any kind, including
but not limited to dwelling units, ca units, garages, barns, corrals, accessory
buildings, swimming pools, ponds, parking areas, fences, walls, driveways,.antennae,
satellite dishes, and-walks shall be constructed, erected, altered, or permitted to remain
within Mayfly Bend, nor shall any excavating, tree cutting, and clearing or landscaping
be done within Mayfly Bend, unldss the complete architectural plans and specifications,
and a site plan shciwing the location and orientation thereof, for such erection or
alteration arid landscaping are approved by the Architectural Committee prior to the
Page -6-
commencement of such work, except as Declarant may be specifically permitted to do
by these Covenants or required to do by any subdivision jmpr.ov_qments agreement
bi:tween the Declarant and'Garfield County. Revegetation of all infills and cuts will be
required. Plans addressing the revegetation of infills and cuts will be submitted to the
Arihitectural Committee piior to any-excavation at least three (3) complete sets of the
architectural and site development plans and specifications shall be submitted to the
Architectural Committee along with a complete list of all exterior materials and colors to
be used. All copies of the complete plans and specifications shall be signed and dated
for identification by the Ownei or the Owner's architect. The Architectural Committee
shall have the right to request whatever additional specification information, plans,
reports, and the- like it dbems necessary to evaluate the development .proposal
thioughout the approval and construction process. ln addition, the Architectural
Committee may adopt rules and regulations which shall specify the information., leports,plans, specific-ations, and the like required to be submitted to the Architectural
bommittee Upon receipt of an application packet, the Architectural Committee shall
have seven (7) days within which to provide the applicant with a written certification
stating whethei the information submitted is complete or incomplete. ln the event the
Architectural Committee fails to take any action within forty-five (45) days after three (3)
copies of the complete architectural and site development plans, specificelio!'t:
miterials, and colord have been submitted to it and the submittal has been certified in
writing by the Architectural Committee as complete, then all of such submitted
architectdral plans shall be deemed to be approved. The Architectural Committee shall
not unreasonably disapprove the architectural plans. The majority vote of the members
of the Architectdral Corhmittee shall be required for approval of plans. ln the event the
Architectural Committee shall disapprove any architectural plans, the person or entity
submitting such architectural plans may appeal the matter to the next annual or speclal
meeting of tne members of the Mayfly Bend Ranch Homeowners Association where a
vote oflhree-fourths of the memberi vbtes entitled to be cast at said members meetings
shall be required to change the decision of the Architectural Committee.
3. Building Permits. An Owner may apply for a building permit from the Garfield
CountyBu1IdingFepaftmentatanytime,provided,howeVer,theplansapprovedbythe
Buildirig Department shall not diffdr in any substantial wayfrom the plans approY.-e! b.y
the Architeitural Committee. lf the plans -approved by the Building Department differ in
any substantial way as determined by the Architectuial Committe-e,lhen all approvals of
the Architectural Committee shall be deemed automatically revoked, and the
Architectural Committee may pursue any and all remedies provided hereunder.
4. Variances. The Architectural Committee may, by an affirmative vote of a
majority of the members of the Architectural Committee, allow reasonable variances as
to iny -restrictions governing architectural control and/or policies or rules..promulgated
by thil Architectural Commi-ttee, on such terms and conditions as it shall require. No
viriance shall he granted which contravenes any provisions of these Covenants or
which violate the Garfield County Land Use and Building Codes. No variance shall be
granted without written notice oithe request for such variance plovidgQ ten ('1.0).days
[rior to the hearing for said variance to all Lot Owners within the Subdivision. Notice to
buch Lot Owners s-hall be deemed complete when placed in the United States Mail, first-
class postage prepaid, to the last knowh address for each Lot Owner as provided to the
Association.
5. General Requirements. The Architectural Committee shall exercise its best
judgment@ents,construction,landscaping,andalterationswithin
Page -7-
Mayfly Bend harmonize to the greatest extent possible with the natural surroundings
and witn other structures as to design, materials, color, sitting, height, grade, finished
ground elevation of neighboring lo[s, and other design features. The Architectural
Lommittee shall strive to- proteci tne view of each Lot Insofar as possible (taking into
account final build out of all Lots in the Subdivision) in the development of Mayfly Bend
pursuant to these Covenants and shall endeavor to protect and preserve the visual
bharacter of the property and preserve and maintain the trees and wildlife in Mayfly
Bend. Each Lot Owners landscaping and building plans must be consistent with the
overall concept of a living within a iesidential ranch and among the natural wildlife
habitat, as described in the Colorado Department of Wildlife Living with Wildlife
brochure provided to each Lot Owner. (Attached hereto as Exhibit B)
6. Soils and Foundation Report. and Grading and Drainage Plan. Lot Owners
are cautioned that due to the high water table adjacent to the Roaring Fork River and
the geological structure underlying the area, a soils and foundation report by ?
professional engineer will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit by-
Garfield County. A Lot Owner shall cause to be prepared and submit to Garfield County
and the Architectural Committee, a soils and foundation report prepared by such a
professional engineer. ln addition, the Lot Owner also shall prepare and submit an
independent sewage disposal system design, and a grading and drainage plan, All
improvements and structures shall be constructed in accordance with the
reiommendations and conditions of such report and plan which are included by Garfield
County as conditions of the building permit or are made requirements or conditions of
the approval of the Architectural Committee.
7. Materials and Landscapinq. ln its review of any proposed development.
actlvity, tneTrChitecturat Committbe shall evaluate. among other things, the materials to
be us6d on the outside of buildings or structures, including exterior colors, location with
respect to topography and finished grade elevations, and harmony of landscqPing with
the natural settlng and native trees and other vegetation within Mayfly Bend. The
Committee shall encourage xeriscape landscaping which emphasizes the use of
indigenous foliage and detreased water consumption. All vegetation and revegetation
shall comply with the attached Vegetation Plan.
access roadways shall be dedicated to public use
responsible forlheir maintenance, repair, snow removal, noxious weed control,
revegetation, and general upkeep of all subdivision roadways.
9. Site Location. ln reviewing the proposed location of any structure to be
placed or built on any Lot, the Architectural Committee shall exercise its judgment s.o.as
io maximize the view plane of each Lot while preserving to the greatest extent possible
the natural characteristics of each Lot and all natural vegetation, including trees and
bushes and the natural setting of each building site. The Architectural Committee must
approve the location of all structures and improvements to be located on the Lot.
responsibildswithintheportionstheydesignatefor.yard.-
are'as along'each building envelope-and within areas of each landscaping enve.lope. lt
10. Yard Size and Maintenance. Each Lot Owner will have the option and
is encouraged that yard Jizes be designed in keeping with the natural surroundings so
Page -8-
Certain
as to allow for free movement of wildlife. The Association will maintain any areas within
any lot owners Landscaping Envelope that is fenced by th.e Associa.tion to allow.grazing
ant keep livestock out df elch Own'ers yard. ln no case shall a landscaped yard area
greater than 7,500 square feet be irrigated without adequate water rights.
1 1 . Fencinq. The Architectural Committee must apppve the type, height and
location of all fending prior to installation. The intent of the Colorado Department of
Wildlife fencing reco-mmendations are to enable wildlife to move freely and witho_ut injury
through the coiridors that are paft of their natural habitat, and the Association will take
thesdrecommendations into ionsideration when approving or disapproving any fencing.
Fencing will be consistent with this intent, recognizing that some fencing is intended to
prevenf movement of wildlife into some areas. Lot Owners must also recognize that it is
their responsibility to fence out livestock within the boundaries of their building and
landscape envelopes if that is their desire. The Association will construct fencing_to
control livestock f6r ranching and agricultural purposes in the open space and NDE
areas as defined on the Final Plat. The Colorado Department of Wildlife
recommendations are attached to these covenants as Exhibit D.
12.Horses and other livestock
non-development easement to prevent such grazing.
13. Hay Storage. Hay storage will be restricted to the barn area in designated
agricultural outbuildings or within 8' high game proof fencing.
14. Lighting. The Architectural Committee shall consider exterior lighting plans
and will recommend tnat all exterior lighting (with possible exceptions for safety) be
directed towards each applicant's propertyand consist solely of down lighting. lt will also
recommend that all Lot Owners make every effort possible to limit the use of exterior
lighting at night. lt shall encourage Owners to build in a fashion that all light sources not
be directly visible from outside of the Owner's property. The intent behind these
considerdtions is to preserve the rural character of the Subdivision by limiting exterior
lighting as much as possible while maintaining a safe atmosphere.
15. Preliminary Approvals. Lot Owners who anticipate constructing improvements
on lands within Mayfly Bend may submit preliminary sketches of such improvements to
the AC for informat and prelimihary approval or disapproval. All prelimilary sketches
should be submitted in at least three (3) sets and should contain sufficient general
information on those matters required'to be in the complete architectural and site
development plans and specifications to allow the AC to grant informed preliminary
approv'al or disapproval. The AC shall never be finally committed or bound by anyapproval or disapproval.AC shall never be finally committed or bound by any
pi6timinary or inf6imal approval or disapproval until such time as complete architectural
bnd site development plans, specifications, materials, and colors are submitted and
approved or dis'approv6d. The'preliminary approval is offered as an accommodation
only, and the AC may set fees for this service.
16. Architectural and Site Development Plans. The AC shall disapprove any
architecturasubmittedtoitwhichdonotcontainsufficient
information for it to exercise the judgment required of it by these Covenants.
17. Architectural Committee Not Liable. The AC shall not be liable for damages
to any person or entity submifting blans for approval, or to any Owner or Owners of land
srazins will FIa rtg_?:,_I1"l:t9:9l91.
ftitt retiin the right to install and needed fencing throughout the common areas and any
Page -9-
within Mayfly Bend, by reason of any action, failure to ac_t, approval, disappro.va.l,...9r
failure to dpirove oi Oi'sapprove with rbgard to such plans. The AC shall have no liability
or responsiOltity for any i6presentations made to any O.ryneL or prospective owner by
third parties. The decidiond of the AC shall_be governed by the-se Covenants and any
rules and regulations duly adopted by the AC pursuant to these Covenants.
18. Written Records. The Architectural Committee shall keep and.safeg_uard for
at least fivel5) years cornplete permanent written records of all approved applications,
including ond (t ) set of the final bpproved architectural and site development.planP, qld
of all acfions oi ipproval or disapSirbval and all other formal actions taken by it under the
provisions of this instrument.
19. Authority to Promulgate Guidelines. Ruleq, and..Rgoulatiols. Thq
Architecturaldadoptdesignguidelines,ruleS,anq
regulations necessary to im[lement these Covenants. These guidelines,. rules, .and
relulations may include submission requirements qoncerning the. type of information,
re6orts, plans and specifications, and other information necessary to make an informed
ddcision'regarding r6quests for development, modifications to buildings, and the like.
1. No Further Subdivision. No Lot described on the recorded Final Plat of
MayflyBenffirsubdividedintosmallerLotsor.conv-ey9dor
eniuirbered in less that the full dimensions as shown on the Final Plat of Mayfly Bend;
provided, however, conveyances or dedications of easements for utilities if approved by
ine RC may be made for-less than all of one (1) Lot. Notwithstanding the foregoing,-.a
Lot line adjustment between a one Lot and another or Common Elements in Mayfly
Bend shali be deemed a permitted subdivision, subject, however, to aly. reviews,
approvals or disapproval's tliat may be required by the Garfield County Land Use Code
and to the prior approval of the AC.
2. Domestic Animals and Livestock. Except as expressly limited herein,
domestica@dwithintheSubdivisionandshallbesubjeclto.?'lY
rules and regulations, which may be promulgated by the Board of Directors or Garfield
County.
A. Garfield County regulations permit one (1) dog for each residential unit and
require that the dog be confined within the owner's property boundaries. Lot Owner
shall be entitled to keep a maximum of one (1) dog on his property. Forthe purposes
of this Article, the definition of Dog or Dog(s) shall not include dogs under the age of six
(6) months. Dogs shall be kept under the control of the owner at all times and shall not
he permitted to run free or to cause a nuisance in the Subdivision. No dogs will be
allowed to roam free. No dogs are permitted on sites during construction phase. No
dogs shall he allowed beyond the boundaries of the Lot owned by the persons where
the dog is housed unless accompanied by a person in full control of such dog Dogs
shall be leashed, chained, fenced, electric fenced, kenneled, or housed at all times.
Location of kennels shall be subject to review of the Architectural Committee.
B. The Homeowners Association shall have the right to assess and enforce
penalties against Owners violating these restrictions applying to dogs as follows;
Page -10-
One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) forthe first violation committed by an Owners
dog, and One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) plus an additional Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for
eacfr subsequent violation, such that the fine increases in Fifty Dollar ($50.00)
increments for each succeeding violation. lf any dog commits four (4) violations or any
dog is caught chasing or molesting deer, elk, or any domestic animals, the Homeowners
Association shall be authorized to prohibit the property Owner from continuing to
maintain the offending animal on the Owner's property.
C. Areas where an Owner keeps any animals shall be kept reasonably clean
and free of refuse, insects, and waste at alttimes.
D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no animal(s) may be kept within a Lot or a
dwelling which, in the good-faith judgment of the Board of Directors, result(s) in any
annoyance to residents in the vicinity or to Lot Owners within Mayfly Bend Except as
expressly limited herein, domestic animals shall be permitted subject to any rules and
regulations which may be promulgated by the Board of Directors. No livestock may be
kept on any Lot without written permission of the Board, unless the Owner has built
facilities for that purpose on the Lot. The restrictions of this section do not apply to the
Lot 5 (the Barn Lot), open space parcel or the NDE portions of lots under control of the
Association, as the expressed purpose for these areas is farming, ranching and care of
livestock. Any Owner maintaining animals shall insure that overgrazing of the Lot does
not occur as determined by the Board of Directors.
3. Underground Utility Lines. With respect to the new construction or extension
of any utilities, all water, sewer, gas, electrical, telephone, cable television, and other
utility pipes or lines within the limits of Mayfly Bend shall be buried underground and not
be carried on overhead poles or above the surface of the ground. Any areas of natural
vegetation or terrain in Mayfly Bend disturbed by the burying of utility lines shall be
revegetated by and at the expense of the Owner or Owners causing the installation of
the utilities no later than the next growing season following installation.
4. Mininq. Drilling. or Ouarrying. Mining, quarrying, tunneling, excavating, or
drilling for any substance within the earth, including oil, gas minerals, gravel, sand, rock,
and earth, shall not be permitted within the limits of Mayfly Bend.
5. Trees. No Owner shall remove any healthy, living trees without first having
obtained the approval of the Architectural Committee. lf possible trees will be topped
rather than removed unless in extreme cases where topping a tree cannot serve as a
remedy to be an undesirable sight, obstacle or obstruction. All construction,
landscaping, and development on any Lot shall seek to minimize the removal of trees
and to preserve the natural trees and vegetation to the greatest extent possible while
bearing in mind wildfire considerations.
6. Shinv Materials. No building or improvements shall contain exterior roofs or
siding materials which are reflective or shiny.
Page -1 1-
l. Number and Location of Buildings. No buildings shall be placed, erected,
altered, or permitted to remain on any Lots except as approved by the Architectural
Committee and consistent with these Covenants.
8. Comoletion of Construction. Any construction activity on any Lot in Mayfly
Bend shall be completed, fully cleaned up, and landscaped within eighteen (18) months
from the issuance of a building permit, unless the Lot Owner shall first obtain a variance
from the Architectural Committee to allow for a longer period of construction upon proof
of due diligence. ln the event a variance is not secured and eighteen (18) months from
issuance of a building permit has passed, the Association may assess penalties in any
amount it deems appropriate.
9. Enclosure of Unsightly Facilities and Equipment. All unsightly structures
facilities, equipment, and other items, including but not limited to those specified below,
shall be enclosed within a solid structure sufficient to screen such things from view from
the common roads and neighboring homes to the greatest extent possible. Any motor
home, trailer, boat, tractor, motorcycle, snow removal or garden equipment, and any
similar item shall be kept at all times, except when in actual use, in an enclosed garage
or outbuilding, provided, however, horse trailers shall not be required to be enclosed.
Any refuse or trash containers, utility meters, propane tanks, fuel storage tanks, or other
facilities, service area, or storage piles shall be enclosed within a structure or
appropriately screened from view by planting or fencing approved by the Architectural
Committee and adequate to conceal the same from neighbors, streets, and private
roads. All trash and garbage containers must be wildlife proof. No lumber, metals, bulk
materials, scrap, refuse, or trash shall be kept, stored, or allowed to accumulate on any
Lot except building materials during the course of construction and only for such
reasonable periods of time as are necessary prior to the collection or disposal thereof.
10. Noxious or Offensive Activity or Sounds. No noxious or offensive activity or
sounds shall be conducted or transmitted upon any portion of Mayfly Bend at any time
nor shall anything be done or permitted which may be or become a nuisance to other
property or to the Owners thereof by sight or sound.
11- Common Areas, Open Soace. Reveqetation and Weed Management. All
common areas and open space within the Subdivision shall be restricted to agricultural,
recreational, irrigation, and utility uses and shall not be used for residential purposes.
The Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of common
areas including the twenty-one (21) acre open space parcel, internal and access roads
and the NDE portions of the Owners Lots and shall require Lot Owners to maintain their
lot in a manner consistent with the nature and character of the Subdivision. Declarant
has had prepared the Vegetation Management Plan for Mayfly Bend Ranch Sttbdivision
which is attached hereto and made a part of these Covenants as Exhibit F. This Plan is
to control noxious weeds within Mayfly Bend -and to provide a Revegetation Plan
according to its terms for the entire subdivision including the revegetation durinq and
affif the suLdivision irylrastructure improvements. lt shall be the
Page -12-
responsibility of the HOA to implement this Plan Noxious
Weed Act and the Garfield Countv Weed Management Plan to manage anv noxious
weeds throughout the subdivision. lt shall be the individual Lot Owners responsibilitv to
r with the Colorado Noxious Weed Act and the Garfield
Cou Weed Plan to noxious weeds on their
12. Unauthorized Vehicles. No snowmobiles or all-terrain vehicles (ATVs)
shall be operated within the Subdivision. No snowmobiles, boats, RVs, or inoperable
motor vehicles shall be stored within the Subdivision unless stored within a permitted
auxiliary building. Horse trailers shall be permitted as set forth above. These restrictions
only apply to areas subject to Association control and nothing herein shall infringe upon
the public nature of the roadways within Mayfly Bend.
13. Satellite Dishes. Satellite dishes shall be allowed within the Subdivision
Location and size of all satellite dishes shall be subject to Association approval. but in
no event shall any satellite dish exceed three (3) feet in diameter, unless said dish is
totally screened from view of any adjacent or contiguous Lot.
14. CommercialActivities. Except as expressly set forth in the Garfield County
Land Use Code, no commercial activities shall be permitted on any Lot in the
Subdivision. The storage of materials, goods, equipment, and other items used or
associated with commercial activities shall not be permitted on any Lot in Mayfly Bend,
provided, however, personal vehicles with a business name placed thereon shall not be
prohibited. Owners shall be permitted to maintain an office within their residences so
long as it does not provide services to the public which result in the public going to and
from such residence on a regular basis.
15. Sewage Disposal Systems. Each individual Lot Owner shall be responsible
for the construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of the individual sewage
disposal system (ISDS) located on the Owner's Lot, and Owner shall be required to
maintain such systems in accordance with all applicable Garfield County regulations.
Should the health, safety, or welfare of any person be affected by the failure of any
Owner to properly construct, operate, maintain, or repair that Lots individual sewage
disposal system, the Association shall have the authority to enter onto such land for the
purposes of maintaining or repairing such system. All costs incurred by such action shall
be borne by the Owner of the system and shall constitute a lien pursuant to Article Vll
on the Owner's property until paid in full by the Owner. Attached hereto and made a part
hereof is Exhibit C which is a typical ISDS maintenance procedure prepared by Sopris
Engineering depicting an example of what will be required of a Lot Owner with regard to
ISDS maintenance. This is only illustrative and informative in nature and the actual
requirements will be site specific for each Lot.
16. General Restriction. All Lots in the Subdivision shall comply with restrictions
contained in any other section of these Protective Covenants.
Page -13-
17. Colorado Department of Wildlife Recommendations. Attached hereto and
made a part of this declaration as Exhibit D is a list of recommendations from the
Colorado Department of Wildlife intended to minimize the impact of this development on
wildlife. These eleven (11) recommendations will be referenced and followed by the
Association in its decisions pertaining to matters affecting wildlife, provided there is no
conflict with other statutes or regulations and are reasonable to the context of the
instant action of the decision before the Association.
ARTICLE VII
WATER SUPPLY
1. Ownership and Use of Wells and Appurtenant Facilities. The Mayfly Bend
Homeowners Association will own the water rights, the well permits and any commonly
used storage tanks for the benefit of the owners of all Lots. The individual lot owners shall
own the well structure, pump, meter and all individual storage tank and pipelines.
2. Operation, Maintenance and Repair Costs. All operation, maintenance,
replacement and repair costs associated with any well, the pump, meter, storage tank and
associated facilities for the withdrawal of water from the wells shall be paid by the Lot
owner and the expenses for facilities that are not shared by all lot owners shall be paid by
the Home Owners Association. All lot owners shall be solely responsible for the costs of
maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement of any facilities used solely by that party,
including individual service lines and storage tanks.
3. Use of Water. The owner of lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and5 shall be entitled to use water as is
consistent with the well permit obtained from the Division of Water Resources for said lot.
Allsuch uses shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the well permit.
Each owner shall be entitled to use so much of the water from the Well as that party needs
so long as diversions from the Well at no time exceeds the maximum allowed by the well
permit.
4. Waste. No owner shallwaste water, and each owner shall exercise prudence and
conservation in the use of water in order to allow for the efficient and beneficial use of the
Well.
5. Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract. A Basalt Water Conservancy
District (BWCD) Contract has been obtained and is in full force and effect providing
augmentation water for the wells and the pond. The Homeowners Association shall pay
all costs of said contract on an annual basis and shall abide by the terms and conditions
of said contract. The contract shall be owned by the Homeowners Association. All
owners shall be required to pay their pro rata share regardless of water use. The Basalt
Page -74-
Water Conservancy District will prepare and file an augmentation plan for the wells for
the benefit of the Homeowners association. Such costs will be charged to the
Homeowners association and the Homeowners association shall pay said costs to
ensure the continued legal viability of the augmentation plan. ln the event that the
BWCD decides that it will no longer file said augmentation plan and that each individual
subdivision or owner shall be responsible to file its own plan the Homeowners
Association shall be responsible to file said plan of augmentation and obtain a final
decree at its own costs.
6. Pond. The Declarant has filed for and obtained a water right for the Mayfly
Bend Ranch Ponds No. 1 ,2 and 3 and the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral, Mayfly
Bend Enlargement in Case No 00CW119 Water Division No. 5. These water rights shall
be conveyed to the Home Owners Association by Quit Claim Deed. The Home Owners
Association shall be responsible for the operation, use, maintenance, repair and
replacement of the ponds at its sole expense.
7. lrrigation Water Rights. The Declarant obtained by quit claim deed an estimated
2.89 c.f.s. of those certain water rights decreed to the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral
decreed in Case No 3017, Garfield County, Colorado. All water rights obtained by
Declarant to the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral with the purchase of the property
shall be quit claimed to the Mayfly Bend Ranch Home Owners Association. The
Homeowners Association shall pay all ditch assessments and shall be responsible to
operate, repair and maintain said ditch for the benefit of itself and the lot owners. The
Homeowners Association shall use said irrigation right for the irrigation of the common
open space. The individual lot owners may also use said rights for the irrigation of their
individual lots in an amount as may be designated by the Homeowners Association on a
year to year basis.
ARTICLE VIII
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS - ENFORCEMENT
1. Assessments. All Lot Owners shall be obligated to pay any assessments
lawfully imposed by the Board of the Association regardless of whether a residential
structure has been constructed. To the extent the Association is responsible therefor,
assessments may he lav,rfully imposed for any items of common expense which may
include, among other things expenses and costs of maintaining, repairing, and plowing
of roads within and accessing the Subdivision expenses for maintaining, improving, and
preserving the Association's common property, expenses of the Architectural
Committee, and insurance, accounting, and legal functions of the Association. Such
assessments shall be deemed general assessments and shall he borne pro rata by all
Owners. Assessments for potable and irrigation water and water-related services shall
be assessed separately based upon the allocation of such services by the Homeowners
Association to the Owners. The Board of Directors may establish contingency and
reserve funds for the maintenance and improvement of the Association's common
property and any other anticipated costs and expenses of the Association to be incurred
in pursuit of its purpose. Contingency and reserve funds shall be in such an amount as
Page -15-
the Board of Directors may deem necessary and appropriate for the aforesaid purposes.
Each Owner shall be required to pay his pro rata portion of these funds. As used herein,
an Owners pro rata portion of common expenses shall mean a fraction formed by the
number of Lots purchased and held by the Lot Owner (numerator) and the number of
Lots in the Subdivision (denominator). The Board of Directors shall have the right during
any calendar year to levy and assess against all of the Owners a special assessment
for such purpose or purposes, in accordance with these Covenants, or the Articles or
Bylaws of the Association, as may be necessary. Such special assessment shall be
paid for in equal portions by the Owners obligated to pay such assessment and shall be
due and payable as determined by the Board.
2. Lien for Non-Payment of Assessments. All sums assessed by the Board,
including without limitation the share of common expense assessments chargeable to
any Lot Owner, any fines which may be levied on a Lot Owner, and unpaid utility fees
and assessments charged to a Lot Owner shall constitute a lien against such Lot
superior (prior) to all other liens and encumbrances, excepting only:
A. Tax and special assessment liens on the Lots in favor of any governmental
assessing unit,
B. All sums unpaid on a first mortgage of record, inctuding any unpaid obligatory
sums as may be provided by encumbrance.
C. Each Owner hereby agrees that the Association's lien on a Lot for
assessments as hereinabove described shall be superior to the Homestead
Exemption provide by Colorado law and each Owner hereby agrees that the
acceptance of the deed or other instrument of conveyance in regard to any Lot in
Mayfly Bend shall signify such grantee's waiver of the homestead right granted.
D. Any recorded lien for non-payment of the common expenses may be released
by recording a release of lien executed by a member of the Board.
lf any assessment shall remain unpaid after thirty (30) days after the due date thereof,
such unpaid sums shall bear interest from and after the due date thereof at the
maximum rate of interest permitted by law, or at such rate as is determined by the
Board, and the Board may impose a late charge on such defaulting Owner as may be
established by the Board. ln addition, the Board shall be entitled to collect reasonable
attorney's fees incurred in connection with any demands for payment and/or collection
of delinquent assessments. To evidence such lien, the Board shall prepare a written
notice setting forth the amount of such unpaid indebtedness, the name of the Owner of
the Lot, and its legal description. Such a notice shall be signed by one (1) member of
the Board of Directors and shall be recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of
the County of Garfield, Colorado. Such lien may be enforced by foreclosure of the
defaulting Owners Lot by the Association in like manner as a mortgage on real property,
upon the recording of a notice of claim thereof. ln any such foreclosure, the Owner shall
be required to pay the costs and expenses of such proceedings, the costs and
Page -16-
expenses for filing the notice or claim of lien, and all reasonable attorneys fees. The
Owner shall also be required to pay to the Association any additional assessments
against the Lot during the period of foreclosure, and the Association shall be entitled to
the appointment of a receiver to collect the same. The Board, for the Association, shall
have the power to bid on the Lot at foreclosure sale and acquile and hold, .
lease, mdrtgage, and convey same. The Association, at its election, and in addition to
any other remedies it may h-ave at law or in equity, may also sue an Owner personally
to collect any monies owed the Association.
3. Enforcement Actions. The Association, acting by and through its Executive
Board,srra@secuteanyactiontoenf6rcetheprovisionsofallof
these Covenants by injunctive ielief, on behalf of itself and all or part of the Owners of
the lands within Mayfly Bend. ln addition, each Owner of land within Mayfly AqE
including the Associaiioh, shall have the right to prosecute any action for injunctive relief
and for damages by reason of any violation of these Covenants. The prevailing party irl
any enforcement iction shall be entitled to an award of its reasonable costs and
att6rney's fees. The Board shall be entitled to assess penalties for late payment.of
assessinents due the Association and to collect interest thereon at rates to be
determined from time to time by the Board but not to exceed '15 perc_ent per month.
After thirty (30) days, written notice to any Owner of a violation of these Covenants, and
the Own6rs failur6 to eliminate or cure said violation, the Association may levy, in
addition to the other remedies set forth herein' a penalty of $25 '00 per day for every
day the violation exists or continues after the expiration of said 30-day period.
4. Limitations on Actions. ln the event any construction or alteration or
landscaping@onanyofthelandsinMayflyBendinviolationof
these Cbvenants and no action is commericed within one ('1) year thereafter to restrain
such violation, then injunctive or equitable relief shall be denied, but an action for
damages shall still be aVailable to any party aggrieved. This one-year limitation shall not
apply to injunctive or equitable relief against other violations of these Covenants.
ARTICLE IX
EASEMENTS
1. Easements Shown on Final Plat. The Association is entitled to use such
easements as are reflected on the Final Plat for the Subdivision. Except by agreement
with a property Owner, the Association shall have no obligation to pay any amount for
the use and enjoyment of such easement. The Association shall pay for the cost of
maintaining and repairing any improvements which it places on any easements.
2. Easements for Access and Repairs. The Association shall be entitled to an
easement across any of the Lots within the Subdivision for the purposes of accessing
any of the Association's.property, protecting-any As.sociation property,,ol fgr nqgqssary
repairs or emergency circumstances. The Association may access all Lots within the
Subdivision at ieas6nable times to determine compliance with the conditions of
approvals of the Subdivision granted by the Garfield County Commissioners and to
determine and enforce compliance with all of the provisions of these Covenants.
Page -17-
ARTICLE X
INSURANCE
1. Types of lnsurance. The Association shall obtain and keep in full force and
effect the following insurance coverage:
A. The Board of Directors, at its discretion, may elect to secure fidelity coverage
against the dishonesty of employees, destruction or disappearance of money or
securities, and forgery. This policy shall also cover persons who serve the
Association without compensation.
B. Coverage for members of the Board and officers of the Association, including
committee members, against libel, slander, false arrest, invasion of privacy,
errors and omission, and other forms of liability generally covered in officers and
directors liabilig policies.
C. General Liability and property insurance.
D. Coverage against such other risks of a similar or dissimilar nature as the Board
deems appropriate.
ARTICLE XI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Covenants to Run. All of the covenants contained in this instrument shall be
a burden on the title to all of the lands in Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision, and the
benefits thereof shall inure to the Owners of the lands in Mayfly Bend Ranch
Subdivision and the benefits, and the burdens of all said covenants shall run with the
title to all of the lands in Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision.
2. Termination of Covenants. ln the event these Covenants have not been
sooner lawfully terminated pursuant to any applicable laws of the State of Colorado and
Garfield County, Colorado, and the provisions herein contained, these Covenants may
be terminated on January 1 of the year 2039 by a vote of seventy-five percent (75o/o) of
the votes entitled to be cast by the members of the Association. lf these Covenants are
not so terminated, then they shall continue to be in full force and effect for successive
twenty-five (25) year periods unless, at the close of a25-year period, the Covenants are
terminated by a vote of seventy-five percent (75o/o) of the votes entitled to be cast by the
members of the Association at a meeting of the members duly held. ln the vent of any
such termination by the members, a properly certified copy of the resolution of
termination shall be placed on record in Garfield County, Colorado, not more than six
(6) months after the meeting at which such a vote is cast.
3. Amendments of Covenants. These Covenants may be amended by a vote of
seventy-five percent (75o/o) of the votes entitled to be cast by the members of the
Association, said vote to be cast at a meeting of the members duly held, provided a
properly certified copy of the resolution of amendment be placed on record in Garfield
County, Colorado no more than six (6) months after said meeting.
Page -18-
4. Severabilitv. Should any part or parts of these Covenants be declared invalid
or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining covenants.
5. Paraqraph Headinos and Underlininq. The paragraph headings and
underlining within this instrument are for convenience only and shall not be construed to
be a specific part of the covenants contained herein.
6. Limited Liability. The Association and the Board shall not be liable to any
party for any action or for any failure to act with respect to any matter if the action taken
or failure to act was in good faith and without malice. The Owners jointly and severally
agree to indemnify the Association and the Board against loss resulting from such
action or failure to act if the Association and the Board acted or failed to act in good faith
and without malice.
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Protective Covenants for Mayfly Bend
Ranch
Subdivision has been executed as of the day and year first written above.
DECIARANT:
George R. Kilby
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
Farley S. Kilby
Acknowledged, subscribed and sworn to before me this
_, 2001, by George R. Kilby and Farley S. Kilby.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
.day of
My Commission expires:
)
)ss:
)
Page -19-
NOTARY PUBLIC
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A - Property description.
Exhibit B - Recording data for subdivision.
Exhibit C -Living with Wildlife brochure.
Exhibit D - 11 DOW recommendations for development impacts for wiHlife.
Exhibit E - Sopris Engineering typical ISDS maintenance plan.
Exhibit F - Vegetation Plan for Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision.
Page -20-
Attachment to Declaration of Protective Covenants following page 20 directing the
rrcader to the location of Exhibits A through F.
Exhibit A - Property Description. See Appendix C - Deed.
Exhibit B - Recording data for subdivision. Will be prepared at time of recording.
Exhibit C - Living with Wildlife Brochures. Included in packet in Appendix [,
Covenants.
Exhibit D - 11 DOW recommendations for minimizing development impact on Wildlife.
See DOW letter March27,2000, copy included in Appendix I, Covenants.
Exhibit E - Sopris Engineering typical ISDS maintenance plan. See appendix H,
Engineering Report.
Exhibit F - Vegetation Plan for Mayfly Bend Ranch SuMivision. See revised document
submitted under Date Tab 09ll0l0l.
tl
FRO]'1 : r:LBY STEEL COI1PRNY
2.
PHONE NO. z 2s/5 831 3A11 Jul. 27 zAAt 11:3546 PAt
LA\^/
ROBERT B.
CA EOUTH
CAFIEONOALE
oFFlcE6
EMERSON. PC.
THIRO ATREET
coLoRADO atres
(gzol ecs-szoo
ROI9ERT B EME51AON
r^x (t7C)) eol,oeac
July 1.1, 2001
Mr. John Dresser, Jr.
Re: Kilby (Mayfly Bend),/Roaring pork presenre
Dear John:
This lener is designed to confirm the general points of agreement reached bentreen our:H:.lllng their meetins todav ieg-arding,il" j;i";;onstruction of roads and orherlmprOvemenB in contrecdon with the ntro suUdivisions referenced above. If I haveaccurately stated the points of agreement in this r.tt.t, ptease have your cliens indicate
trt?Jlr'."ilr,#ill do so as well as discussed, I *iiil;al a copy Jr,r,i, retter di.dy
1.lH,:;:::l:::s,:11", f::.ft: cost orconsuuction of trrat portion or the road in
ff lxi#?y,il?ffi :l?'j,i? j:l:T:9;;;;ffi hi:iH;;J'";j#; jtrl;
DIJI-9/14 Roafing Fork preselve, LLC (RFp). This same cosr sharin, u.,"rrr"r'uy
(*t'J ano
gtll:',::{{:!jl T;ri,i:-,l.iuaing naturar gas and possibrv,.r"rrrl'#s1H"Jr%(
:;#iiffi;iT;lH,ffiT[.9./1 4 P aatirrc EarL D-^^^.-.^ r r ^ /hFhr
.ro,r:.r::il1::."19:gl::::auainr"utu,.rililffi iril;1T;il=#&ffit:
to install rcl :1Tpo",road area,'recognizing ttraf Mg may be able u,
resPonsible for pavment of common expenses associated ;;il irT;"iir?##i ii,li,ijr6,lines.?&e-wk-
H:,:"1.,'j"...",^::1.,::::rj:?Iisj "n\; for fire protection services, MB will pay
I f : :jl: :? : :: :'::: I i:l _y !h d ri I I i rig. a weri f; ; ;il ;;;;;J ffi;i i il;,ilJ lJ#
:lj,l,r:":^:.li::::I^rypiij: ploviaeg"rro;;;;;#rfi;[;;;:;*T[ilt;'.il:iil
;'"1}Tl#il:lj:',:f,:,1":;qf,"o::::Irl,'r,*.' ",i;;;;;;;.is" #i,r,'n the MavnvBend subdivision in lieu of trris cost sharing #.ng"*L"r.
3' The parties will be individually responsible for the cost of consrmctjng all other
* srta uep Re T€c€F l\..1^rrl 4^:c, GuOoTjalc_
FRNN.: K:LBY STEEL CONPRNY
.:
PHONE NO. i 2A5 831 3411 Jul. 27 zAAt 11:36R1'1 PA2
roads in their respective subdivisions and MB h'ill be solely responsible for the cosr of
consffuction of Road A from che end of the common road area to the sourhem Mayfly
Bend Subdivision boundary.
4. The common road area will be surfaced with a three inch asphah mar. The
pardes are free to consffuct other roadways within the respective subdivisions in a
different fashion so long as the roads are consrructed to, and conform with, County
standards. The parties intend that the roads will be constructed in both subdMsions at
the same time as part of one project by the same conractor. The parties wilt jointly hire
Yanry Nichols as an engineer to finalize the road specifications, submit a requesr for bids
and select the contractor to perform the work. Nichols will also be rhe engineer to
cerdfy that consnuction complies with Counry sundards. Nichols'fees will be splir in
the same Propoftion as the cost associated with the common road area. If requested by
either ParW, a deposit of each party's estimated share of engineering expenses will be
deposited in advance in an escrow account.
5. The parties will attempt to negodate a three-parry agreemenr wirh Garf,eld
Gounty whereby each of the parties will deposit their respective share of the cosr of road
consuuction within their projects and the common road area, plus ten percenr. The
agreement would authorize use of the funds to make periodic payments to contractors
based on certification of compledon of work by the project engineer and the County
engineer. Once the respective construction costs for each party have been determined,
the parties will make arrangemenrs ro obtain and depo.sit rhe necessary funds. Both
parties have authorized me to work with the Garfield County Attorney to reach such anaareemenr. Alln1,*,-)€,(,
6. RFP will receive a credit in order to recoufla pordon of High Country Engineering
fees for surveying and engineering segices in connecdon with the common area of the
road. t[e portion of fees to be recodyi'Cd will be split in the same ratio as descrlbed
above. (The same cost sharing ratio shall be applied ro prof'essional fees for drafting
agreemeTr and negotiating with the County. Such professional fees will include ^
aitorney's fees incuired by nfn, which MB will ,gr"" to reimburse upon tnvotceJ
%fff<\F<7. The parties agree to slrare the cost of construction of cenain entryway
improvements, which include the bridge as conceptually planned by RFP, landscaping
and fencing from Counry Road 100 to the bridge, and landscaping and fencing north of
the bridge for a distance to be determined. The parties will make a separate agreement
to outline the specific nature of the improvements and deposit of funds for constnrction
PurPoses.
8. MB will not participate in the cost of construction of the ponds planned at the
entryway by RFP. RFP will receive a credit of $6.00 per yard for roadbase constnrction
material excavated from the pond areas and delivered to and used in the road
consrruction. RFP will retain sole ownership and right of use of all top soil generated ln
connecdon with constn:ction of roadways within RFP.
o
@
- Sae l-efiG.e- @,1<.-*J D
5'{l'
'tlt.1./o,jW
U
rRoN. : .KILBY STEEL CO|4PRNY
.
PHONE NO. i 2A5 831 3811 Jul. 2? ZAAI 11:37RN PA3
The other mafter agreed rc during our meedng relates to vacadon of the existingeasement for the benefi-t of Mayfly Bend Subdivision, granting an emergency accesseasement through Mayfly Bend Subdivision for the beiefit oiRoarint r"orr. p.eservL andgranting a new road easement through Roaring Fork Preserve for the-benefrt of frfaynf
-
Bend Subdivision in the event that Roaring roit Preserve is not developed. Each prli*iudedicate rhe roads for public use and will irea-te emergency access easemen6. However,because the recording of plats may not occur for somc-time and in order ro prorect theinterests of both parries, your clients will sign a quit claim deed in favor of no.ring FoltPreserue to vacatethe existing easement. Your clienrs win also sign a deea of easementto RFP which I will draft granting the right of ingress and.egress Jru, " portion of MayflyBend Subdivision for emergency access purposes. You williupply G leial description-'for this easemenr. These wo deeds will be:igned, notarizeo ind de[ver-ed to m" to holain escrow pending the recording of the- Roaring Fork Preserve subdivision plat, and onceso recorded, I am authorized to immediately record the truo deeds. l1 additir;, R;"ri"gFork Preserve will grant an easement (which I will draft) for access to t tayfly Bend e
Subdivision over the- new road alignment. This easement will also be tretd tn escrow andwill be recorded in the event that the Mayfly Bend Subdivision plar is recorded prior tothe Roaring Fork Pre.serve subdivision plat. In such event, the quit claim deed of rheexisting road easement will also be recorded, along with the new road atignment
easement immediately after the Mayfly Bend Subdivision plat is recordea. fne escrowagreement and appropriate documents for which I am responsible will be prepared andprovided to you in the near future. I understand thar you have made rtre itranges that Ihave requested rc the quit claim deed to vacate the original easement and that thisdocument will be signed in the near future.
I believe that this letter accurately sets forth the points of agreement reached in themeeting' If changes are necessary, please let me know. If not, please have your clients
sign and refttm a copy to me.
Sincerely,4
Roben B. Emerson
APPROVED:
MAYFLY BEND SUBDIVISION
rbrf ot
George Kilby (via email to Gkilbvl@aol.com
Dave McMorris (via facsimile)
,z/r7:ac/ .(rrz QE -->JD ry'z/or .4zaa tuzts aq Pe / 87- aF
Cc:
7V't-s .<rZffi
\*,
KILBY STEEL COMPANY PHONE NO. | 2A5 831 3411 Jul. 2? ZAAL 11:37RN
Gcorge R. KilbY
P.O. Box 1855
Ca rlrondale, Colorsdo 8L623
July I 7,2001
Mr. John Dresser
Aspen, CO
Dear Joltn,
I receivetl Bob Ilmer.son's drafl of 7llVDl via e-mail, and I think he did a good
job of recording the con.sensus of our meeting.
'Ihere are a couple of points that should be clarificd, and if you agrec witlt the
6alance of it I will signit. I had a voice nrail fiom Petcr Dunn at C.I. yesterday, but it
was too latc to return it. IIis mcssage wa-s thst they woulrl likc to get the "road
ugrecment" signcd belirre I leave on'flrursday AM, and I assume he means approval of
Emersort's lcttor.
Ileler to llob's lettcr numtrered paragraph l.: refcrcnce to 'tclephone" should be
..electrical power uul telcphone." Since our mecting I have contacted Qwes and the
phone scruice will most lftely be along Road A. as the existing Iine on our proPerty is not
suflicient for the subdivision nceds. I have also contacted Holy Cross and they are
preparing o contract to serve Mayfly Bend from the existing line on the west end of our
parcct. ihis contract will bc temred "phase one- and will cover scrvirrc to lot # 4 arrd our
bay bt // 3. phase two will tic ou al thc vault serving lot # 4, and run east serving the
other lots. tloly Cross nralcrial is on site and ditching will begin today.
Rcfer to paragraph 6.:'tecoup" of I'Iigh Country lbes is s little fuzzy. Our intent
is tp rccognize that RFP has incurred sorne expcnse from HC that is applicable to the
p"rrrron"ni joirrt vcnture and will be recognizctl as such. By like tokcn MRR has incurred
"*p"rr" foi ilstnllation o{'culverts and roadwork that will become permanent, and thesc
"*p.n.t"r
witl trc treated in the same rnanner. Other HC cxpenses pertain to their GarCcr
applicatiou (as do onrs fiom Sopris) and are not to be shared.
,. ^ . 6 Cpntinuing paragraph 6; "cost sharing" of professional lbes includes draftirrg and
@1\W/ ncgotiating o, ,r.it.rs potuirring 1<l our *^riroo intcrests, antl should include MBR
5sCr,rylr- "*i"r,.". Ib, thc same iu.por". this slmuld bc interpreted narrowly and oould lead to
misunderstandings if it is no1 carcfully documented and controlled'
I will attach this lctter to a1 c-mail to you and will also pa-ste the text in the body
o1the c-rnail. Follutting will probably bc lost in the pastc. I.,et mc hear from you ASAP
and I will follow your dircctions. I will return l'ctet's call today anrl tell him you are
working otrt details with Ernerson.
FRFTI :
@a fl5*fril|
:;::: z*T?4/"/r/,
t f rrf a r
1
4rrrsct /, RBC /,oa
VEGETATION MAI{AGEMENT PLAN FOR
MAYFLY BEND RANCH SUBDIVISION
The vegetation management plan for the Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is designed to
establish and maintain a desirable native plant community while controlling noxious
weeds. This management plan is designated for all common areas including roadsides,
open space, the barn area, and utility easements on the Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision.
Recommended control measures for weedy species will include cultural, mechanical,
chemical, and biological. It is our recommendation that chemical and biological control
be limited to the maximum extent possible and only reserved for large outbreaks of
noxious weeds.
Site Characterization
The Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is located in Carbondale, Colorado and falls within
the Rocky Mountain Region of Colorado. The site can be characterized as a montane
grassland. Mountain glasslands dominant species usually include fescues, oatgrass,
Junegrass, and Mountain muhly. The Mayfly Bend Ranch is no exception, dominant
grass species include: Arizona fescue, Junegrass, and Mountain muhly.
Soil Characterization
Information about the soils were provided by soil surveys from the United States
Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. The primary soil type on the
Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is Redrob loam, characterized as a poorly drained soil
on alluvial valley floors. Primarily derived from sandstone, this soil is moderately
permeable in the surface layer (-14 inches) and rapid permeability in the layers beneath.
The effective rooting depth ranges from 20-60 inches depending on the water tolerability
of the vegetation. The water table is fairly high and can be found at depths ranging from
18-48 inches.
Noxious Weed Characterization
During the noxious weed survey, Beach Environmental, LLC, did not note any extensive
outbreaks of weeds. Limited, small communities of Russian Olive, Canada Thistle, and
Plumeless Thistle were found. Due to the aggressive nature of these weeds, the
vegetation management plan has established guidelines to help control the spread of these
species. These guidelines are reproduced from recommendations provided by the Native
Plant Revegetation Guide for Colorado, a guide published by Colorado Natural Areas
Mayfly Bend Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC - L -
DOMINANT GRAMINOIDS ON THE MAYFLY BEND RAI{CH SUBDIVISION
Festuca arizonica Arizona Fescue
Koeleria macrantha Prairie Junegrass
Muhlenbersia montana Mountain Muhly
Program, Colorado State Parks, and Colorado Department of Natural Resources and
recommended by Garfield County for planning purposes.
Canada Thistle (Cirsium artense)
Description: This aggressive weed forms large dense patches of
prickly plants along the bottoms of intermittent drainages and
other areas with moist soil. This thistle, however, does not do as
well in continually saturated or inundated soils (although, it does
grow in seasonally saturated or inundated sites). It is extremely
difficult to eradicate because it has an extensive root system and
new plants can grow from even a small piece of root. One plant
can colonize an area up to six feet (1.8 meters) in diameter in one
or two years. Canada thistle grows to three to five feet (1-1.5
meters) tall, has spine-tipped leaves, smooth stems, and small
lavender flowering heads.
Management Measures: In addition to prevention, the critical management measure is to
stress the plant by forcing it use stored root nutrients. The most effective way to prevent
this species is to revegetate moist bare soil.
Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpful, but not
completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is often necessary after the
thistle has been removed from an area.
Mechanical Control: Mowing can be effective when combined with herbicide
treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow
throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing alone,
without herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over several years.
[,ate spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant material is available
to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will have to be repeated
annually for several years or at three-year intervals.
Chemical Control: Herbicides can be effective, especially when combined with
mowing, tilling, and competition with other plants. Mow two or three times in the
summer at monthly intervals (beginning at bolt to early bud-growth stage) and follow
with a fall application.
Biological Control: The larvae of the weevil Ceutorhyncus litura bores into Canada
thistle, weakening the plant. This weevil alone will not effectively control thistle but it
can be combined with other methods. Urophora cardui is another insect that helps
control this weed. Grazing can be used in the spring and early summer to help control
thistle in riparian areas as well.
Mayfly Bend Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC - 2 -
Russian-oliv e (E laeagnus angustifolia)
Description: This fast growing tree has silvery green leaves and
Iong thorns. The fruit is olive shaped. A European native,
Russian-olive has been widely sold in Colorado as an ornamental
shade tree. Along some streams, Russian-olive has completely
replace native woody vegetation such as cottonwoods, thus
reducing the amount and quality of wildlife habitat.
Management Methods: Russian olive trees can be controlled by either cutting the trees
down and treating the stumps with herbicide, or pulling the tree out of the ground when it
is young. The cutting method should be used on trees larger than two inches (5
centimeters) in diameter. Cut the Russian olive trees within four inches (10 centimeters)
of the ground. Within five minutes of cutting, treat the stumps with an herbicide.
Appropriate herbicides to use would include Garlon, the premixed product Pathfinder and
Rodeo. Garlon decomposes rapidly after application, in a day or less in sunlit water and
approximately two weeks to two months in soil. Rodeo (glyphosate) is specified for use
in riparian or wetland habitats. Monitor and implement follow-up treatment as needed.
Follow-up treatments are best completed the following June before any possible resprouts
have time to grow. Retreated areas should be monitored every 6 months until complete
mortality is ensured. Care should be taken not to introduce any herbicide into adjoining
waters.
Trees less than about two inches (5 centimeters) in diameter can be wrenched out of the
soil be means of a weed winch. Removal of small Russian olive trees will be easier when
the soil is moist so that the majority of roots can be extracted.
Plumeless Thistle (Carduus acanthoides L)
Description: Plumeless thistle is a member of the Aster family,
Thistle tribe. It is an introduced winter annual or biennial. This
plant can be distinguished from musk thistle by its smaller flowers
- 112 to 1 inch in diameter. The leaves of plumeless thistle lack the
prominent white margin present on musk thistle leaves. The plant
may grow to a height of 5 feet or more. Flowers are reddish-purple
and are either solitary or clustered. Taproots are large and fleshy.
Mayfly Bend Ranch Vegetation Management plan
Beach Environmental, LLC - 3 -
Plumeless thistle is an extremely prolific seed producer. It is found in pastures, river
valleys, and along roadsides. It is rapidly increasing in this state, particularly in
northwestern Colorado (Pitkin, Garfield,and Eagle Counties).
Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpful,
but not completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is often
necessary after the thistle has been removed from an area.
Mechanical Control: Mowing can be effective when combined with herbicide
treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow
throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing
alone, without herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over
several years. Late spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant
material is available to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will
have to be repeated annually for several years or at three-year intervals.
Chemical Control: Herbicides can be effective, especially when combined with
mowing, tilling, and competition with other plants. Mow two or three times in the
summer at monthly intervals (beginning at bolt to early bud-growth stage) and
follow with a fall application.
Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpful,
but not completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is often
necessary after the thistle has been removed from an area.
Mechanical Control: Moving can be effective when combined with herbicide
treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow
throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing
alone, without herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over
several years. Late spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant
material is available to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will
have to be repeated annually for several years or at three year intervals.
Biological Control: Unknown.
Weed Surveys
When controlling weeds, the weed manager shall be on the lookout for outbreaks of other
weedy species including but not limited to:
Mayfly Bend Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC - 4 -
Absinth Wormwood Perennial Pepperweed Yellow Toadflax
Black Henbane Plumeless Thistle Blue Flax
Canada Thistle Posion Hemlock Chicory
Common Burdock Russian Knapweed Common Tansy
Dalmation Toadflax Russian Olive Dames Rocket
Diffuse Knapweed Salt Cedar Mediterranean Sage
Dyers Woad Scotch Thistle Oxeve Daisv
Field Bindweed Spotted Knapweed Pumle l.oosestrife
Hoarv Cress (Whitetop)St. Johnswort Scentless Chamomile
Houndstongue Sulfur Cinquefoil African Rue
Jointed Goatgrass Perennial Pepperweed Camelthorn
Leafy Spurge Plumeless Thistle Rush Skeletonweed
Musk Thistle Volunteer Rye Sericea lrspedeza
Orange Hawkweed Yellow Starthistle
Weed Control Schedule
The proposed schedule for the Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision is mowing of weeds
monthly during the summer months of June, July, and August, and following with a
chemical application during the fall month of September.
This schedule is designed for general weed control and is geared towards the removal of
the most common weeds on-site (thistle). However, some weedy species such as
Russian-Olive require different schedules and techniques for control. It is important that
the weed control schedule remains flexible and is able to accommodate a variety of
weeds. The weed manager is responsible for identifying outbreaks and if necessary,
redesigning the schedule to control that particular weed.
Revegetation of Site
Once weeds are removed, it is important to reintroduce site appropriate native vegetation.
This will help prevent the return of weeds to that area. Revegetation with native seed
materials will occur annually during planting season. Seeds should be planted within two
weeks of shipment. The revegetation site shall be prepared and wetted down prior to
planting. Supplemental watering shall occur after planting to ensure a high survival rate
of native seeds. This can be accomplished through on-site irrigation.
Revegetation Plant Material List
Plant materials to be used for revegetation planting will be native grasses either taken on-
site or purchased from a local native plant nursery such as :
Rocky Mountain Native Plants Company Pawnee Buttes Seed Inc.
2730 Snowmass Creek Road 605 25th St.
Snowmass Colorado 81654 Greeley, Colorado 80632
970 927-0925 L-800-782-5947
Mayfly Bend Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC - 5 -
PI.ANT MATERIAL LIST FOR THE MAYFLY BEND RANCH SUBDIVISION
Festuca arizonica Arizona Fescue
Koeleria macrantha Prairie Juneprass
Muhlenbergia montana Mountain Muhly
Proposed species to be used are the dominant granimids already present on-site and may
include a mixture of one or more of the following:
Weed Control Service
Pesticide application will be provided for by a local weed control service company in the
Roaring Fork valley, including but not limited to:
Gallagher Agriculture Services 7348 County Rd 331 Silt 876-2864
Mountain Lawn 3758 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs 945-9333
Roaring Fork Vegetation Management CO. El Jebel 963-9723
Western Vegetation Management Aspen 920-9L6L
The Mayfly Bend Ranch Homeowners association will provide for payment for chemical
application and all other weed control measures.
0273r.01.doc
revised 8/9/01
Mayfly Bend Ranch Vegetation Management Plan
Beach Environmental, LLC 6-
Documents Submitted on August 15,2001
Compilation Note: The following letter dated August 14,2001, from Mark Butler,
Sopris Engineering LLC to Kit Lyon, Senior Planner with copy to JeffNelson, Asst.
County Engineer declares that certain documents will be submitted in the Appendix
section of this application. At the request of Staffall documents submitted herewith are
located under the 9/10/01 date tab.
3. Appendix E (Geo-technical report)
The reference 3.1 calls attention to a full drainage report dated August 8, 2001, and
states that this report will be submitted in Appendix K, Drainage Report of the
application package. This report consists of eleven ( I 1) pages, including a rnap, a
pipe culvert analysis and two exhibits, and a forty-five (45) page appendix. At the
request of the Planning Staffthis report is not located in Appendix K as noted, but is
found under this 9/10/01 date tab instead. This 8ll4l0l letter also references the
hydrologist report prepared by AquaTerra LLC dated 8/8101evaluating the "scour
potential" on lot 3. This report is a six (6) page document and is also included under
this 9/10/01 date tab.
4. Appendix F (Water Supply Information)
The references 4.1,4.2 arrd 4.3 address the Assistant County Engineer's inability to
locate the well permits, yield analysis and water quality report in the application file.
All of these documents were submitted at an earlier date, but are resubmitted herewith
for reference.
All other references in this response to Engineering Review of 6113/01 are self-
explanatory.
Compilation Note: The following letter dated August 15, 2001, from Mark Butler,
Sopris EngineeringLLC to George R. and Farley S. Kilby comprises a revised
Engineering Report, but is not submitted in Appendix F, Engineering Report, but rather
under the 9/10/01 date tab as requested by Staff.
August 14,2001
Kit Lyon
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
109 8rh Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Mayfly Bend Ranch, Supplemental Engineering Report
SE Job No.20065.01
Dear Kit:
This letter is our response to the Engineering Department Review of the Preliminary Plan Application to Garfield
County submitted May L2,2001. We hope to address any engineering issues noted in the June 13, 200L Staff
Comments. The specific items that we found in reference to engineering issues are addressed below.
1. General review comments:
L.L. The comments on the 24" x36" plan set will be addressed on the plans, Two sheets have been added
to increase clarity, a Preliminary plan sheet at 100 scale and a Master utility sheet at 200 scale to show
utility extensions off site. See Mayfly Bend Ranch Preliminary Plan,24" x 36" Sheets l,-6 with
Revision date 8-13-2001, attached. AIso note the revised Engineering Report dated 8-L3-0L which
reflects updated information corresponding to the changes on drawings.
1,.2. Date correlation will be addressed in the application package.
1.3. All titles will refer to preliminary plan application.2. Page iv of Appendices
2.L. Appendix M includes the response from the Carbondale Fire Deputy Chief dated March 27,2000.
2.2. The on site wetlands were delineated by Beach Environmental as depicted on our plans. The proposed
development is designed not to encroach upon any jurisdictional wetland or the Roaring Fork River
therefore approval from the Army Corp of Engineers is not applicable.3. Appendix E (Geo-technical report)
3.1. A full drainage study prepared for the site dated August 8, 200L is attached and will be submitted in
appendix K of the application package. The drainage study addresses the volume of storm water
drainage pre and post development. A hydrologists report prepared by Robert J. O'Rrien noting his
findings from a site review of the Mayfly Bend Ranch and the adjacent property conducted onJily 24,
2001 is attached. The hydrologists report addresses flooding, erosion and scouring along the Roaring
Fork River and specifically addresses Lot 3 were the building envelope is close to the river and
wetlands.
4. Appendix F (Water Supply Information.)
4.1. Domestic water will be supplied by 5 separate wells (permit numbers 54865F-54869F), one for each
Iot. Two rvell permits (54382-F and 54383-F) rvill be assignerd to augment ground rvater for ponds 1.
and2. The original well that was drilled will be re-permitted under one of the new permits in its
original location to serve as a domestic well. The seven well permits and the existing well test report
are attached. The seven well permit site locations with 200-foot radius were added to the Master
Utility Plan Sheet 2 of the plan set for clarification. lnigation water is to be provided under the
jurisdictional rights to water from the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral. Refer to Appendix F, Water
supply information in the application package for legal documents and agreements for further
clarification.
4.2. The existing well test report summary by Zancenella and Associates is attached.
4.3. The existing well test report summary by Zancenella and Associates is attached.
502 Main Street ' Suite A3 . Carb0ndale, C0 8i623 . (970) 704-0311 . Fax (gZ0) 704-0313
$oPRrs EnGmrrRlltG LLG civil consu ltants
sE. JOB 20065.01
August 14,2001
PageZ
Appendix H (Engineering Report)
5.1. Electric service is on site on the west side of the property near the north edge of Lot 4. Eleckic service
will be extended underground from the overhead line on the west side of I'at 4,through Lot 2 to the
turn around near I-ot 5 within a 15' utility easement. From this point it will be extended to the edge of
Lots 1 and 3 within the access and utility easement. Telephone service will be extended from County
Road 100 right of way to the property within the 60' Right of Way, for Road A to the turn around near
I,ot 5. Telephone will be expended from that point along the same easement as the electric noted
above. The owner has an agreement with Holy cross for power and with Qwest for telephone service.
No cable service has been proposed. Gas service is to be extended by others to the intersection of
Road C on the Roaring Fork Preserve project. No line extension agreement has been ananged for gas
service. See Sheet 3, Master utility Plan for proposed location of utilities.
5.2. Note the 5 separate wells noted above, information attached and in appendix F of the application
package.
Appendix K (Drainage Report)
6.1. A full drainage study prepared for the site dated August 8, 2001 is to be submitted with the application
package. The drainage study addresses the sizing of appurtenances for a L00-year storm.
If you have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call.
Sincerely,
SOPRIS ENGINEERING
frrulfia
Mark Butler, P.E.
Project Engineer
Cc: George Kilby, Owner
Cc: Jeff Nelson, Assistant County Engineer
Au 200r
George R. and Farley S. Kilby
505 Sandy Lane
Anniston, AL 36207
Re: Mayfly Bend Ranch, Preliminary Plan Application
SE Job No.20065.01
Dear George:
This letter comprises our revised Engineering Report for the Preliminary Plan Application to Garfield County with
response to the latest Garfield County Engineering comments dated June 13,200L.
Introduction
The site is approximately 40.61 acres on the south side of the Roaring Fork River. The site is generally comprised
of irrigation pasture. The site has an access easement from County Road 100 that has been rerouted under and
agreement with the Roaring Fork Preserve. The Banning Lateral irrigation ditch conveys water from the southeast
corner of the site across to the northwest at a'l.Vo slope.
Water Supply
Domestic water will be supplied by 5 separate wells (permit numbers 54865F-54869F), one for each lot. Two well
permits (54382-F and 54383-F) will be assigned to augment ground water for ponds 7 and2. The original well that
was drilled will be re-permitted under one of the new permits in its original location to serve as a domestic well.
The seven well permits and the existing well test report are attached. The seven well permit site locations with 200-
foot radius were added to the Master Utility Plan Sheet 2 of the plan set for clarification. Irrigation water is to be
provided under the jurisdictional rights to water from the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral. Zancanella and
Associates, lnc issued the groundwater investigation on September 6, 2000 associated with the pump test and water
quality tests conducted on August 29,2000 by Samuelson Pump Company. In summation the report states that the
well will probably be able to operate at a rate of 28 gpm for an extended period. Water quality tests indicate that
well is within the standards for community water supply as defined by the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment.
Sanitary Sewer Systenr
The proposed residences will be served by individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS). Attached is a report
prepar:ed by Flepworth-Paulak Geotechnical, Inc. dated June 16, 2000, which determinecl the percolation rates for
the on-site soils.
The combination of high groundwater and being mapped within the flood plan reduces the type of ISDS designs.
We would recommend an engineered sand filter or, more specifically, a mounded type system for final discharge
use. Based on the site plan and well location the actual ISDS dimensions and design will vary. Required setbacls
from on-site wells, irrigation ditch, dwelling, and property lines must be maintained. The ISDS site shall be place
on the same lot as the residence but outside of the non-disturbance area defined for the lot.
502 Main Street . Suite A3 . Carbondale, C0 81623 . (970) 704-0311 . Fax (970) 704-0313
SoPRls EnGrltrrnlltG 11G civil consultants
sE. JOB 20065.01
August 13,2001
Page2
Conclusion of my investigation regarding the feasibility of constructing an on-site ISDS indicates the following.
1) An engineered on-site ISDS utilizing a mounded sand filter system meeting all of the appropriate setback
requirements appears feasible for a primary residence and accessory dwelling.
2) On-site soils, as noted in HP Geotech report, indicate average percolation rates between 7 and L5 minutes per
inch and should be suitable for a conventional mounded sand filter system.
ISDS Operation and Maintenance
A properly designed and utilized ISDS system should require minimal maintenance. Several factors influencing the
need for maintenance include; actual wastewater flows versus design flows, the volume of kitchen/domestic waste
(excluding human waste and toilet paper), excessive household chemicals or other toxic liquids and the physical
integrity of the system components. It is recommended that the septic tank, absorption field and dosing tank (if
applicable) should be inspected annually. In general, for a properly designed system, septic tanks should be pumped
every 2 - 4 years. For systems with a dosing and/or distribution pump system it is recommended that the pumps,
valves, siphons, tank, control floats, wires and any other applicable components be visually inspected annually for
wear, damage, leaks, or other potential problems. Absorption fields should be maintained with suitable cover and
kept free of root invasive plants. Positive surface drainage away from the absorption field should be maintained.
Attached is an ISDS operation and maintenance guideline sheet.
Drainage
Refer to the Drainage Study for Mayfly Bend Ranch; Prepared by Sopris Engineering dated August 8, 2001.
Shallow Buried Utilities
Electric service is on site on the west side of the property near the north edge of Iot 4. Electric service will be
extended underground from the overhead line on the west side of Lot 4, through Lot 2 to the turn around near Lot 5
within a 15' utility easement. From this point it will be extended to the edge of Iots 1 and 3 within the access and
utility easement. Telephone service will be extended from County Road L00 right of way to the property within the
60' Right of Way, for Road A to the turn around near Lot 5.'felephone wili be expended from that point along the
same easement as the electric noted above. The owner has an agreement with Holy cross for power and rvith Qwest
for telephone service. No cable service has been proposed. Gas service is to be extended by others to the
intersection of Road C on the Roaring Fork Preserve project. No line extension agreement has been arranged for
gas service.
If you have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call.
SOPRIS ENGINEERING
fuaMzz
Mark Butler, P.E.
Project Engineer
Cc: Kit Lyon, Garfield County Building and Planning Department
Cc: JeffNelson, Assistant County Engineer
ica 6 .f
ililII
!1,.)it
ieLevarrou i
"{,trr.
r.levot I|.' 6220.54 It,ittJlr. I
i.l, "rn.r, Ililtrl'-t1. I+ 627s.7e
Irlil!r 6357.23 itti: 6272.17 iilrllj-]tl;!it
!ii;i!rl:li. IiIillir i
ii
IIATIOIIAL FLOOI! IIISURAIICE PROBRAT
HRt
rLOOD IHSURAIICE RATE iIAP
GARFIELD COUNTY.
COLORADO
(UNTNCORPORATE D AREAS)
PANEL 1880 OF lg(l0
(SEE M,AP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PFINTEO)
G 0H I'lU ilITY-PAll E[ llu[lBER
080205 1880 B
ilAP REYISED:
JAN UAHY 3, 1986
Federal Emergency Management Agency
KEY TO MAP
100-Year Flood Boundary
-
Zone Designations
I 00-Year Flood BoundarY
500.Year Flood BoundarY
-
Basc Flood Elevation Line
With Elevation ln Feettr
Base Flood Elevation in Feet
Where Uniform Wirhin Zone*r
Elr:varion Reference Mark
Zcne D Boundary"--'--
River Mile
Zr)NE
A
AO
*513.-
{EL 987}
. RM71
rM1.5
r*Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
,\H
EXPLANATION
Areas of 100'year floo .; base flood elevations and
frl-"? nil"ii iattott not detcrmined'
lltrf[t***$,',nq'lf,t',"i,'u:i**
Areas of '100'year .shallow flooding- where
-dep^ths
are between one (l) tniinttJ-Biiect; base'flood
elevations are shown, u't-no flood hazard factors
are determined'
A'.-A3O Areas of 10O-year flood; base floqd elevations and
ilood hazard factors determined'
r\eg ' A,"as of 100'vcar flood to * fl:f::tiil f[ltpiotection system under construcllon;
elevations tno'iood'n-"i"'i
-f"ttott not determined'"
fqi**"li,;**+t+uxll',l,.';ll,l:mile; or areas I
ir,'r"iiurn shadinS')
C Areas of minimal flooding' (No shading)
D Areas of undetermined' but possible' flood hazards'
v n,"as.of roory# :,Xf"11LIl"l"iHH.T9:i?tly,X:action); base t
not det'errnined'
vl'v30 l*E,: f *';tTI :':""'.'iL li?i Hr:'T3ll?'l}'ili
determi ned'
NOTES TO USER
Cer tain areas not in the special flood hazard araas (zones A and V)
i.v U" pto*.ted by flood control structur?s'
This map is for flood insurance purposcs ollyi:t- d-o.es nol neces-
sarily show all areas "orlti-i"'iitoJing
in lhe' communitv or
all planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas'
For adioining map panels' see separately printed lndex To Map
Panels.
INITIAL ID ENTI FICATION:
DECEMEEB 15,1977
trI ^NO HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS:
\
\
//'
/
ZONE C
mfl
LIMIT OF
=gI= ":Iit\,'"
ZONE C
ZONE B
LIMIT OF
DETAILED
STUDY ZONE A3
,ss
AND RIO
36 t_tMtT oF
ILED STUDY
.+1ru=G
DETAILED ZONE
6212 \ lozlz &ti
6216 I 6',
LIMIT OF
DETAILED STUDY
ROARING FORKRIYER zoNE BA )or,re c
ZONE C' 62s8
r.7 s. 35
B/\
AquaTerra Se
August 8,2001
Mr. George Kilby
Mayfly Bend Ranch
P.O. Box 1856
Carbondale, CO 81623
Lot 3 Site Report
Dear Mr. Kilby,
As per your request, I conducted a site review of the Mayfly Bend Ranch and the
adj acent property on July 24, 2O0l , and again on August 7 and 8, 200 I . Although I was
already familiar with this reach of the Roaring Fork River valley, this review was
specifically designed to assess the potential for scour and deposition in the vicinity c,f Lot
J.
In sum, there was no evidence of either recent scour or deposition (recent delined
in decades), and no evidence of scour for a longer time period (based on soil bores the
last significant floodplain scour at this location is tentatively dated in hundreds of years).
In addition, the site is topographically high, located away from the active
channeVfloodplain and protected from sheet flow by a vegetated and prominent terrace
re-entrant. More importantly, the site is located in a depositional zone, and given the
trend in river behavior and the reinforcement of this trend by work completed under the
federal river restoration plan, it is likely that this location will remain depositional fcrr
some time to come. As such scour potential is minimal and there is no need for an in-
depth hydrologic analysis of the floodplain in the vicinity of Lot 3. Details of the site
review follow.
The aerial shown on the following page was taken in October of 1999, and
illustrates the position of L,ot 3 relative to the river and adjacent properties. Scale har;
been manipulated to fit this format, but is roughly 1 inch = 500 feet. Note that Lot 3 is
separated from the active channel by a well vegetated riparian area and by 3-4 feet of
elevation rise. These factors combine to provide significant velocity protection during
exceptionally large floods. In this respect, several large flows have been experienced in
this reach during the last 25 years. None of these events produced sheet flow or standing
water on the subject property, and no significant scour or deposition in the river section
adjacent to Lot 3.
Aclrt"rfir. Flablt;tt Constr uction & lmprovenrent n Ranch 6.. Prof)eft.y l?6)(-iaffrati..rn " lliver l?est:ration
.;#fl
t:,1:r,1a(,- r_( Sr-r.i :
f'hcrr-. !'7f ')-li' i_. :
rqLr.:,.,,f rr',i1 i a,rn,
Mr. George Kilby
Lot 3 Report
Page2
Figure l. Aeriol View of Rooring Fork Volley & Subject Property.
In contrast, upstream and downstream of Lot 3, areas within the active channel
and floodplain show clear evidence of recent scour and deposition. Examples of scour
include cantlilevered banks, hanging vegetation, bark stripped from tree trunks, channel
cuts, sheet flow stripping, imbricated splays devoid of vegetation, marked changes in
local sedimentology and micro- and macro-scale entrenchment. Examples of deposition
include wide-spread debris traps, pronounced bars with fining upward sequences, fresh
unconformities, buried soil horizons, buried vegetation, and macro-scale awlsions
associated with increases in width/depth ratios of side channels.
Rather than detail occurrences of these and other examples and their geomorphic
relevance, it is believed that a few photographs will illustrate the marked difference
between Lot 3 and more active areas. Each picture group is representative of three major
zones found at the site, which can be summarized as: 1) active channel, 2) active
floodplain and 3) upland terrace. Each zone will be represented in order on the follc,wing
pages.
=--.- |
l
* .t@
Mr. George Kilby
Lot 3 Report
Page 3
Figure 2. Active chonnel zone', typicol pool/riffle tronsition. View of lhe Rooring Fork
looking upstreom (eosterly). Note diogonolsheor migroting to upstreom point bor r:nd,
degroding tholweg, exposed toe olong riprop, eroding streombonk. ond ovolonche
crest on the distol end of the point dune in bockground.
Figure 3. Active chonnel zone', typicol pool/point bor reoch. View of the Rooring Fcrk
looking downstreom (westerly). Note ripropped bonk, deposiied ond stoble point bor,
degroding tholweg in foreground ond stobilized tholweg in bockground, exposed toe
' ..q.;.:e*ifrIH+,tF
{.a'.
E?;!
George Kilby
3 Report
4
riprop in foreground ond stobilized streombonk in bockground, ond lower
th rotio thon in Figure 2.
Active floodploin zone; typicol scour oreo. Note lock of riporion vegetotion.
left center.relict cobble/boulder substrote in left center ond tenoce cut in
e 5. Active floodploin zone; typicoldepositionol oreo. Note stocked debris,
t vegetotion despite obvious flood mognitude, grovel bor deposited in center
ond generol oggroded comportment of side chonnel.
Mr. George Kilby
Lot 3 Report
Page 5
Figure 6. View of riporion oreo odjocent to Lot 3. Token from uplond ienoce. looking
northwest; note lock of flood debris or evidence of scour.
Figure 7. Uplond terroce zone, Lot 3. Photo token inside building envelope looking west.
Typicol blend of colluviol ond olluviol feotures with better developed soil profiles thcrn in
other zones. ond currently in posture use.
t-
6
George Kilby
3 Report
In sum, l,ot 3 is an acceptable building site and is better protected from flood
than many of the homes on neighboring properties. With some attention to
placement of a proper foundation and other sensible construction techniques,
should be no exposure problems associated with extreme flood events.
If you have any questions regarding this assessment, or require further
ion, please don't hesitate to call.
/A//o&"-
Robert J. O'Brien
Principal
. FROI'I : KILEY STEEL COI'lPAhrY
P.O, Box 19OB
1006 Coopcr Ave.
)lenwootl Eprlngr,
co sicqt
PHONE NO. , ?A5 831 3811
t')
t)
il'tr'
Dec. 73 2E@ @,i?Tt1 P05
(970) ear.tToo
(970) 0.t.1260 FrxZancaxate aND AssocutEr, r,r(.
September 6,2000
Mr. George Kilby
c/o Caloia & Houpt, p.C.
1204 Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Mayfly Bend Well #1
Dear George:
At your request, Zancanella and Associates, lnc. has cornpleted the groundwatorinvestigations associated wlth the Mayfry Bend w.rr*r. in#6;;;;iiiiis stuoywas rodetermine the ability of the wellto t,ipp]t, the anticipated ne;di oiitr" pioposeo MayftyBend subdivision. lnformation contain'e'o in this report covero $re wil punip test report andwaler quality tests.
Ueyllylend.lflpl.El
The Mayfly Bend Wett #1 was completed on August 2g, .2-0q0 by the shetton Driilingcorporatlon' At thetime.of dritlls.tr,tiwellwas reglsteied with Colorado Division of Water
f999u1c-es u.nder permit 054382:F (copy attacheJ). The wefl is tocated in rhe sE% of theNE% of section 35, Township z souilr, hlnge 88 west of the 6th p.M:$proximately 2600feet frorrr lhe nofllr seclion line and g0 feeifrom ihe east section line.'The approximatelocalion of the well qnd-the Mayfly Bend Subdivision boundary are shown on the attachedgeneral location map, Figure 1.
The wellwas drilled to a totaldepth o[42,feel,.througtr the Pleietocene to Recent RoaringFork alluvial material. The static water level in the-Mayflv Bena Welrfi on August 2g,2000 was 6'67 feet.below the top of the well casing. The well was constructed with ten feetof slotted steelwell casing set at a depth of 32 -Zz trlt. At its curreni static water levelthere.is approximately. 25.33 feet (32 feet - 6.67 feet) of available Jiawoown. Thedrawdown represents ttre available drop frorn the initiiistatic level. Thsaitaclred Figure
? h": be.9n prepared to illustrate the well construction detaiis.- At;r ;G;heo is the weltconstructlon reporl from Shelton. Drilling.
Pump fegt Results
A pump test was conducted on August 29, 2ooo by Samuelson pump Company utilizinga 1 % horsepower electric sutrmersibl",.plrq that was powered by a portable generator.The"pump tesl was conducted at an initiat r"t" oi'zd g"[on per minute (gpm). Tho pumpwas hold at the 28 g?.m rate lhroughout the entire 4iour test. The drawdown and timedata collected during the test are prlsented in Table t. we rrav" pil-ttio iil results of the
Enorrgmr{oCof{slrrtar{rs
FROIT : KILBY STEEL COT.{'RI.IY PHONE NO. : M 831 3A11
Attachments
\\Frecl\zAe lobsU0000U07ZE Ktltry, George\punrpTartReptW6lfIr.wpd
Dec. t3 2OA@ B2:23P1'l PEE
test in a drawdown vE. lime curve aE shown on the attached Figure 3. ThE maximumdrawdown following the 4-hour test was approximately 0.875 ieei. The water levelappeared to have stabilized (remained at a fixed level) within the first few minutes of lhetest and stayed at that level until the end of the test.
Recovery.data for the well following the pump test were collected, but since the water levelrecovered to the original static level within ona minute of the cessation of pumping, tG;was insufficient data to construct a recovery graph.
The test indicates that the well will probably be able to operate for extended periods at therate of 28 gpm. This.pumping rate is rn6re than two iimes tne average iear monttrtydemand (7'7 gpm) for the proposed Subdlvlelon, We believe that this rnefiwifl oe aoequai6to serve the subdivision. A second well, Mayfly Bend well#2 which has been dril|ed, butnot tested, can be added later to provlde acidiiional mechanical reliability to the pumpinjsystem.
Wttef Quallty
Finally, water samples were collected during the pump test and sent to Grand JuncilonLaboratories for analysis for Nitrates/Nitritej and io uL cotorao" o"p"rtrent of public
Health and Environment (CDPHE) lab in Grand Junction for a bacteriai"si. Results of thelaboratory tests are attached.
The bacteria analysls from the CDPHE conflrms that bacteria wsre abeent from thesample. TheNitratesNitritesresultsyieldedavalue otO.22miiriJr"r"p"irit"r(mgll). TheCDPHE's Maximum contaminant L6vel (McL) for these compounds is 10 ,g[;o theresull was well below the MCL.
It is pur understanding that this wellwill be ysed as a comrnunity water supply as definedby the colorado Departrnent of pubric Health and Environment.
lf you have any questions, please feel free to contacl our office at g4S-5700.
Very truly yours,
,
Zeneanella and Ascoclatee, lnc.
tu\r
Thomas A. Zancanella, p. E. I
Page 2
Geologist
FROT : KILBY STEEL CBIIPANY PHONE NO. : 285 831 3811 Dec. t3 4W @224n1 PCI?
PROJECT TOCATION IIAP
ALLUVII tit
RDCKS. GRIVEL
KILBY STEEL COFIPFII'IY PHONE NO. z 2a5 831 3611
Hote Dloneter =
Stotlc Vqten Level
6RT]UND
LEVEL
Dec. 73 Ats@ O?:*n P@
9.
6,67'g/?g/00
10'-a0,
+l' to 32'
7, OD PLAIN
O,A4O VALL
STEEL CSG
THICKNESS
3e' to 4?,
7',. I,!., 0,a40, vqttSteel Perf Coilng
WELL
wELL D
#t
ETAI MAYFLY BEND
4?',
RLflLlIMf
'llmc
(ryir.slrrl
LogflImc)rtY,L. Illenrurcorcnt flnwrlonn
(tcrtl o(fitlnl t'
(mhnral
rt'lfctt)(htchct)
E29l(,0 l0:50 nM 6.0u E swr,829/00 t0:51 AM 000 ?.00 7 0.9r
849rc0 10:52 AIr ,0..r0 7,00 6 0.8,28U29lU0 10:.53 A 3 0.4t 7,0,t .87
t/29l00 l0:5tl AM {0.60 7,00 6.5 .t?It29l00 l0:3.r AM s 0.70 7.00 6.3 0.t?I E8rzqoo lo*o au-0 0.?E ?.t 0 6,J 0.t7
010:5E AM f,0.90 7,00 6.S 0.87tA9l00 I l:00 nM lu 1.00 7.00 6.S 0.E?
-
1.9!..?.00 6,S 0.87
t29100 I l:(tS AM ts l.lE 7.00 6.5 0.t7 2tE29/00 I l:10 AI{7,1)I.30 7,00 6.t 0.87 rttt291002l0PM2002.J0 7.6.3 0.t7 2Et/2900 2:50 IM ,t 2.3t 7,6.s 0.t7 Sop frmrpinr8/29/0o.Jt FM-2.rt 6.00 t 0.00 0 I
FROII : KILBY STEEL COI'FRNY PHoNE N0. : 2O5 831 3811
T ALE I
Pump Tett Dstfi
Mrytly Bcnd Wc[ il
Dec. 13 ?9llm OZ:V6fa1 W
Wo[ il):
JnbNo,: 20728
-
(..ticnt: _ (honc KilhY _
Tcst lty: Sauruclron
tutilylls lly: BCI!
Q' 2l l;rrn,G ns.w.r..=:-ei-i
u -]---n
I llrlc/UltC en: 9zOO0 10:10 All
rmyDrro otr: -f iffii- nrohcrad
'l c*t t.ngrh, --dd'F- rrri rime
zaic.riona t nGroctaba. toc,WcrlIl'rnx'tt$
UFg
d
o
3
FBOT4 : KILBY STEEL COI'IPRNY PHONE NO. : 2@5 831 3811
PRR
(U) pnry Jrrr1l
Dec. 13 A@ A2:%Pl1 P10
Eoo
oc)
8
dttEi,c,g
€
t!
oEI
t!N
Id$rI a A8.,r 8E .E-9
$EE E
&8,
EEfBVl-
o
E'(o
o
I
I'-f
I-.t.
I"'l
I
!
!
I't -'---
I
I't*
I
I ,H U,t*I;:
-l
tsFl-.rl4I
llIi
I..t'I
I-t-
t
It'
E
Y
E
I
fr
li
I!llt
Il(
t1rl
,/g
,
BIt
."t
I-'1" -
I
I
I
I
t
- -t'-- "-' .'t- '-
I
I
h*
I
I)
)
,.'..R
lEl
FRO[1 : KILBY STEEL CONPAhIY
'FoIm No.
6ws.25
AUil tCaNT
2A5 831 3411
.cao{t3331
!
Dec. t3 W g?:2?l+1 P11
!... l.Ilrll I laI
,lUU aJ 93 yt ratrrlt. I livlr ,l r t a l11r i t rjra5rr hgayutr1qaalplflf!-ol^rt r s_r|?E EI{GINEER
9,1ffi fr+B9"PJYIfl Plln*.tg$HBiEsouRcEB
I
I
;
oEoRcE i rcuv
'O
CALONT HOUFT FC
r2o. oRA{DAvE
GLENWOOD SFR|NO8, CO 81101.
.t
0r0l r}ooc7
APPIOIFp u,ftl Faq+fi6u
o^RrttlocouNlY
!t rr. NE ln t cthn t, .Tarilhh ? 3 RrnCrttW Sbor p.il,
D9f ' I'lotc FrOl' UtCTqU#itFr
2t0t0 Fr. ilurr Norh t dm Un
.ifi'Lr pmilr ilurtEi
otv, c m !t D!t. BA3m rD
90 Fr.tur E''I trahnunr
-
rSsrJANCE OF THIE FERMTT Does uoi conpen e weten noxr
Eor/Qlfi ortti Q? ^rgrfrr.LI
',
Thh E3ll rtull * 'i1I .turt .. wr, :! l, ctura no mrrrfit iru'ury o oettti, stt r ftShrl Thr tltuncc of rnir 9r,inl6ex nolt'&'t tha tPP{c.rldlriminfurywlfl oErt?lo mctrivirrd urrL, rbtx orpr;loet merp ornrrerr vil;1lwilarrlghtiltn.rafint ntidh e dult oun roaa
Tht EonrrrrE$on ol0$ T,a[ mtll Da h^comrtutg! ,ith thi WrEr Wrlt ecrrjrucUon Ruhr Z CCR rlo!.e. u,ilf0, frrrovd#;j|f 'Jnffi ffi m j""roioaarmd?d;;fi rrco,,anaon,rFu,,,nrdrrron
t'l Approvro lunurns E cRs !7'0&r!7el b? lrr| 6lrrn cl.oa of ! ra[, rpDtDprlfln, grrolno nrr $!u.[, b llrr m]heFott Rtv,' !' Qn 'lE
arE po[n ol oil*liii nr rr"lrr eo"ourr i, i" c.notcn hrh. ril ,t,.r !. oDc,.n! o'il,when hr Br,3[w.nrconrunnayfificfrefir&m-;;;6ir;m,lpDrurd
uy mlur tsrjnrrr,bh drrsmowtrF t wrtrr llhuD''t Fnulsl oruDi iro ur0 anrr ano rra-ili,,[ wer caurnancy obficrhth! rd.1n! dItPlrot'n'm wrLr frsm irno Rrrurur ic rn .arc. * i r,ci'.i ffiic ttao E l.rtmcoorion. lwcD onna ttll.1t Tno rm oi g.unr wr''' tcm at *n r rnL E- grr*y hanrrrota psrpo3.3 rnrtd bur (r, drrn hrnrry ailrrilurr.tholntrtonolnotmorcnul,600rqurnfrcarrom;dfiilil,'r*_,rncr.#Driltgortonofttt, Alurctrtrcwrfi will bt cunalDd unto 0r *rrr incsr* onrt,. 0r a p.,, lor o,gmrnrderr lr h cfre!l lnr muinum pumrdnt ,"E or afr rcr a'!u .cr rrcnrd 16 op,. 't'cr'r','r '' rlr !"ntEL
:l ]f :]}.:f:r rmoum or t.-a ,*, o ;;;;h ,ror .sod 2.r e .o,r.60lt t t nt ormrr lhrtf mrfi fir mtl h t BnDtcuoua plrca uth wd pornh nrr'br(r). rntlrr ot rt rqultlr,,tnd c.urt crrr, ?Hil,H,.#ffi,}13:l[X**:y._; i,.o,ao* p pnrrw rhrr'.,n,r;n r.l, TT lS *lll chlll li ccnnruarc nor mo't hrn i00 lcot lmrn rhr loctrion spcclfioil on g1b Dn m "! m'r-r'r'
3) . A totrtrtn0 0ovinrrr rnun DG lnal|flaa on ub *tU rrU.rnrlrrdncd ln good *o]r[A wlrr. Frnrmrm rocorrr or r[dlvcnlon! mugt bc ficiltlncd ly urr *ur orir? (rrcordad r lersniiurrg m6 auD,n|lud lo hr Dlrtton Engln.'r upontfgull ,i ' 'r 'r,'{
10' Thb irifl 3hdr rri conrutrcrr! t rrrr coo rrtr iom rny ed]hg sdr.
11 | ThE 9ffmil h!6'b"n lpF,ovro b? t'lt rc. ht prr /r t.".! on nreu'!.! ut.. lna caro.r.,oa rmt rttr.tp.oit.Yos tr! norrDl noglc! IT tcu hl* h0 ,fi E lPpst Urc ilrrrrno J t & pc,rmit oy filinc I xi.nrn r.{grl *ih tn,t 06ilillIlffiJ.T',J.?j.ii,1d 'Ary#,riiliii'Iltriitur*iuc pooc,,,ot ecr €rc i*ocn zr4.1o.
tAPPROVED ,I$ro ,,t
FROT,I : KILBY STEEL COf'IPANY
lll.J. JU (rl, ;rl9 t l, Ja Nq
;.
PHOI.IE NO.
Jllll, t Uta llt J L& I ttU vv
: 2@5 831 3611 Dec. L3 m A2:Z3F1,1 Plz
Lr^ ,llr. J r LtJ. / .r\ru l l. I
Cotorado Oepen,I^cjl-t of pu!ilc Healrh and Endronmcntcompilance Monttoring-i:6ilil"r"lrlmmt
unttREP.RTII{. F'RM FoR M@ onoarra,SAMP.EB: PLEA'E FlLt our oNE F'BM 'FoR EacH rNDrvrDuAL sou'cE,pL^-;;;;srE s.rYEs r
'I
or ilo txl THE'E BEsuLTs ARE To BE usED To.FutFrLt st*rr sAr4pL,NG REourREMENTs.... tNSTRUCnoNStDEFtNtTtoNS
ON DACK (tF FOw..t.llAllRrn e.
:ilffi.i* ,,,0,00_SYSIEM'ESTABT'SH'V lewrrvanae, ttuyfry. Bun,I Slbalil".on :...sYsTEi'loootttt'
@,co Br6olc'ilTAgrpensonJta<l Pebti "' q'y .'Ar r.'se*piEF5iti.r. pHsx5,.r .97o , r!5:570ogararLElel)tLECTED BY. Drad PEek" \'NE!.| ' : ' v l'.-'':r r.uuwArER;;;;r'*'*""--" r'Tti,fi::t;mLocATroN(s):_Addr*s rv.(.yr l ,
Miyfry Brnd.irelr *1 . .-^,,-rj, -- -':::-' stlir.tBrowrfi:
-,
r{rrtr Head
Do sAirPtEs ilEED To ae comiijsrreo er.r ^i,.,o^rri.ri t, yE: I , o, no , O
::: :::\,ED'NMr.ABo:1 rgnY ry LAa pHoNE E.1"{
+Ht.2q2-76tg
t'tethoo +.offi,a.rcOMMEt{Ts. ftlethod fre;-ffi,,.r
FROI'I : KILBY STEEL COMPRNY PHONE NO. z 2W 831 3011 Dec. L3 ZqW @?:ryn P15
Datc
Anal yzedr
eLLrP,:t
9/ 7 /OCt
9/ l /QQ
,.. !-'j.
-County Rd. IOO
I.
\ .1,(s(\
j11ffiTemrnr6al
P,ISAOIEEB
NIIBAIt.rV
NNRhE-N
lmg/ltFr-tlrlf
c,j ?2 ._
(,. ??a',q
lmgll
Tnr
to.o
EPAi.rEuoa IHlr*
D-]?J,I?Pr_ .,; . o- oL_
DSE67goB .-,,.ci. olDsB6zeor ;+_10.o
r.o
St-- ffilUi.gp* i.r.a.ryr.d ror. !.r w- brrow rhr L.b MDr.#iiffiflffi-,,-,, :r
'!:tr'. r i.
FIOfI : KILBY STEEL COC1Ptr{Y PHONE NO. : 2A5 831 3811
cout lrltry u xot@uxunrnr B enrverr
E nourr,.re 11lp"rw E mmrronuB M'*'HoG
fl srcoer runaosE O rrmsliro
I
-
olLOBll{E nE$ount
-Afidul{: jiWheo
Dec. 13 ?ggB A2:*t1 PLA
,;"i.;,,' ;::.*,,:
rfro.!*o^ryt!*gltrQ*sEr**s ur*,rf$/'@ I'l fiffi^3L?"'#3;B$:I$, ffi'ffi.]'#'*', BAcrERtotocY DsbyE,qp/ot
"^,.u"ootif,i*bgk
necEv;o ,..1 ,t .
--E;-f,Ett LTt: sc iEvGnas roe ErPlnr rEN
rurArcoLr,o'M E *scw, p *r*t
usrrmtAlLEno.
colrFoirrytonrL
cnY CIUNIY
(grrrrFLE xAY NOI 0E IEETEo tr ar tilt(nt noil tB ltgr PEInDEO'
")tvt"'' i
Form No.
GWS.25
.PPLICANT
OFFICE OF THE STA-TE ENGINEER
99LORADO DlytstQr{ oF wArER RESOUFTCESBl8 Centennial Bldg., l3l3 Slrerman St., Denver, Coloiaao AOiOi
-
(303) 866-3s81
WELL PERMTT NUMBER _ 54S65 _E
1r
)'
DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD
Lot: BARI.J Block:Filing: Subdiv: MAyFLy BEND RANCH
GEORGE R I(ILBY
C/O CALOIA & HOUPT PC
1204 GRAI.JD AVE
GLEI.IWOOD SPRINGS, CO B-1601-
(e70) e45-6067
OF USE ISTING
APPRC)VED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTYNW 114 SW 1t4 Section 36
Township 7 S Range BB W Sixth p.M.
ROM NI
2680 Ft. from
800 Fl. fronr
Section
Sectiorr
Z +zLO/--,//
Nortlr
West
Line
Lin e
r)
Northing: Easling:
ISSUANCE OF TI-IIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER tt|GHT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This viell shall be used in such a way as to cause no nraterial injury to existing vrater rights. The issua,ce ol,this per,ritcloes not asstlre the applicant that no injurywill occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vesteclwater right fronr seeking relief in a civil court aclion.
The construction of this urell sltall be in conrpliance vrilh the water well coni;truclion Rules 2 ccR 402-2, unless approvalof a variance has been qranted by the State Board of Exarniners oiwater well conr;truction and pump lnstallalionContractors in accordance wiUr Rule 1B
ult'rproverl t.lrit;uant to cRS 37-90-137(2) [or the conslruction of a well, appropriatinll glrorrnd vzater trilrtrtary to lhe Ro;:ringFork Ri','er, as an alternate poirlt of rii'rersion to the Basalt ctinduit, on Ure ccnclition lhat ilre lvell shall be operatecl onlywlren tlte Basalt water conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approvecl by the State Engineer, is in effect andwhen a water allotment contract between the vrell owner and the Easalt water conservancy District for 0re release ofreplacenrent water frorn Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or uncer an approved plan for arrgmentation. B!\/cD contract /1368Approved for the change in use ol an exisli^g welr, pernrit no. 543i!3.F (canceled).
The use oI grotrnd vrater frorn this well is limited to orclinary householcJ purposes insirje one (1) single lanrily dwelling andthe uratering of l0 ltorses All use of this well will be curtailed unie:;s the water allotnrent contract oi a plan foraugrnentation is in effect.
The maxinrunr pumping rate of 0ris well shall not excee<j .l 0 Gpl,1
The annual withdrawal of grounct vvater fronr this well shall not exceed 0 56 acre-feet.
The return flow fronr the use of this well must be through arr individual waste water disposal system ol thenon-evapotative type where tlte water is retutned to the same stream system in whiclr lhe well is locatec1.This rvell sltall be located not tnore than 200 leet from lhe location specitiecl on this perrnit.
The orvner shall nrark tlre rvell in a conspicttous place with well pernrit number(s), nanre of the aquifer, and court casenurnber(s) as appropriate The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings.A tolalizing flovr meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. permanent records of all
il::::"
must be marntained try the well owner (recordecJ at least annuaily) arrd subrrritted to the Division Engineer upon
urtu!_cooRptr{ATES
4)
s)
6)
7)
8)
s)
10)
11)
12) This permit lras been approved for a purrtping rate of 1o GP[I ano an annual rliversion of 0.56 acre-feet based on ,rerequested ttses and the calculalion sheet submittec.l for this vrell. You are hereby notif,ed that you have the rig,t to appeal
ff,:'liJ:"^:1fl'.i;lillj,::!;?,,11ffii!:T';:#xff,:liTilllJ:;tj:j*lr;;ts x:;*ti"{fry4"
,ROVED
JD2 t'*1W
By
EXB 162001
l,,ili(]
f.Jo
State Engirreer
TEI SUEDF:IRATI DA
i l-'r
t-)
FEB 16
Forrn No.
GWS.25
,PPLICANT
35['3FfJb' 5',i,El3,l?"''i,fl]Eilhu, o urRC ES u v\, l\l I t"{ i; u u r Y
Bl8 Cenlennial Bldg., 1313 Slrerrnan St., Denver, Colorado80203
(303) 866-3581
GEORGE R I(ILBY
C/O CALOIA & HOUPT PC
1204 GRAND AVE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601.
(e70) e45-6067
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A
4)
s)
6)
7)
8)
e)
10)
11)
1 095
WELL PERMIT hIUMBER SAAOS -F
DIV. 5 VVD 38 DES;. 945;1 MD
Section Lirre
Lot:1 Block:Filing: Sul:Civ: MAYFLY BEND RAI.JCll
APPROVED WELL LOCATTON
GARFIELD COUNTYSW 114 NW 1t4 Sectiorr 36
Towrrslrip 7 S Range BB W Sixth p.M
pr srAl\c ES FRoM SEEnaN_LINES
2150 Ft. frorn l,,lorth Section Line
800 Ft. from West
UTM COORDINATES.
Nor lhlng:
lssuANCE oF TlJls PERMIT DOES Nor coNFE:R A WATER RtcFtr
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) This vrell sltall be used irl sttclt a way as lo cattse no material injury to existing water rights. Tlre issr-1ance of this pernrit
does not assrlre the allplicant llrat no injurywill occur to anotlrer vested water right or preclu<Je arrollrr:r owner of a vested
water right fronr seeking relief in a civil court aclion.
2) The corlstrttction of this vrell shall be in compliance urith the Water Well Constructio,n Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval
of a variance has been granted by lhe State Boarcj of Examiners of Water Well Construction and punrp lnstallation
Conlractors in accordance vyith Rule 18.
Approved pursltant to CRS 37-90-1 37(21 tor tlte construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to lre Roarilg
Fork River, as an alternate point o[ diversion to the Basalt concjuit, on the condition lhat the well sh;rll be opeiated only
when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's subslitute vrater supply plan, approverd by the State Engineer, is in effect anr1
when a vzater allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy District for the release of
replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or unrjer an approved plan for raugmentation. BWCD conlract /1368.'flre use of grorltld water ftortl tlris well is lintited to ordirrary lrouselrold purposes ins,ide orre (1) single fanrily <jwefling andtheirrigatiorrof nottnorethanT,500squarefeet(0.17of anacre) of hornegarcJensandlawns. All useofthisvrell will be
curtailecl unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augrnrli,tation is in effect.
The ma:rinrurrr pumping rate of tlris well slrall not exceed 1O GpM.
Tlre annLtal vvitltdrawal of ground water from lhis well shall not exceecl 0.81 acre-fee.t.
The retttrn flow [ronr tlre use of this well nrust be through an inciivicjual waste r,vater <Jisposal system of the
tton-evaporative type wlrete tlre water is returnecl to Ilre sanre sireant systern in which the urell is locatecl.
This well slrall be construcled not more than 200 feet frorn the location specifiecl on this permit.
Tlle owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well perrnit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court casentlmber(s) as appropriate. Tlte owner slrall take necessary meons and precautions to preserve these markings.
A totalizing flow nteter must be installed on this well and nraintained irr good working order. permanent records of alldiversions ntrtst be maintainetJ by the well owner (recorded at lear;t annually) ancj srrbrnitted to the Division Engineer upon
r eq rrest.
This pernrit has lleen approved for a pumping rate of 10 GPM and an annual diversion of 0.81 acre-f*et based orr therequested uses attrJ tlte calctrlation slteet subrntttecl for llris well. You are hereby notified that you have the rigltt to appealthe issuance of this pernrit, by liling a written request with this office witlrin sixty (60) rlays of the date cf issuance. oursuantto tlre State Adntinistralive Procedures Act. (See Section 24-4-lo4lhrough 106, C.Ft.s14* 24 1-- a ZZZ2o,2 (
Z---'ra-4$'
1bo. 9500377 By
XPIRATI TiI:
,PROVED
DMW
FEtJ
Form.l'lo.
GWS-25
APPLICANT
Ul-l'lULUl- IHESlAlhhhlGll{EER /\lAflrc*p.-
f,Sh:9,$ffi 9.[txtp"lg,I,"P#"w,"a];EnirrsouR.ds/yyl\lhF-l',SCOPy
ul-l-luE ut- IHE S tAt h hl{Gil!EER
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colcrado 80203
(303) 866-3s81
Lot: 2 Block Filing:Subdiv: MAYFLY BEND RANCH
GEORGE R KILBY
C/O CALOIA & HOUPT PC
1204 GRAl.lD AVE
GLEI.JWOOD SPRII.IGS, CO B1601-
(970) S45-6067
APPROVED WELL LOCATION.GARF:IELD
COUNTY
SW 'll4 NW 114 Section 36 -
Town:;hip 7 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M.
DISTI\NCES FROM SECTION LIhIES
2560 Ft. from North Section Lirre
500 Ft. from West Section Lirre
UTM OOORDINATES
Northing: Easting:
WELL PERMII NUMBER 54867 .F
DlV. 5 \'VD 38 DES. BASIN
PERM
4)
5)
6)
7)
B)
e)
10)
11)
STRUCT A WELL
ISSUANCE OF TIIIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in suclt a way as lo cause no nraterial injrrry to existing water rightS. The issuance of this permit
does tlot assure the applicant tlrat no injurywill occur to anothe|rested water light or preclude another owner of a vested
water right front seeking relief in a civil court action.
Tlte constrttction of this well shall be in conrpliance with the Water Well Cohstruction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval
of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construclion and pump lnstallation
Contraclors in accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuattt to CRS 37-90-137(2) [or the construction of a well, appropriating ground water lribrrtary to the Roaring
Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion lo the Basalt Conduit, on the condition that the well shall be operated only
when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by lhe State Engineer, is in effect and
r'rhen a water allotnrent contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy District for llre release of
replacetnent '.nrater frotlt Rtledi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. BWCD contract /1368.-[.lre ttse of ground water front this well is lirililed to r-rrdinary lrolselrolrl J)urposes irrside one (1) sirrgler fanrily clwelling arrdtheirrigationof notmorethanT,500squarefeet(0 lTofanacre) of homegardensanrjlawns. All useof thiswell will be
curtailed unless thewater allottnent contract or a plan for augrnentation ls in effect
The rna:<irrrunr punrping rate of tlris well slrall not exceed 10 GlrM.
Theannual vvithdrawal of groundwaterfronrthiswell shall note>.ceed0.B1 acre-feet.
Tlte return fiow front the use of this well must be tlrrough an indiviclual waste water disposal system of the
non-e'raporative type where the water is returned to the same st'eam syslem in wl:,ich tlre well is located.
This v"ell shall be constructed not more than 200 feet fronr tlre location specified orr this permit
The otryner shall nrark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), narne of the aquifer, and court case
number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary nrealrs ancl precautions to preserve thesr: markings.
A totalizing flow meter must be installed orr thls well and rnaintalrred in good workir,g order. permanent records of all
diversions nlttst be maintained by the well owner (recorded at le:st annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon
reqrrest.
Tltis permit ltas been approved for a pumping rate of 10 GPM and an annual diversion of 0.g1 acre-feet based on therequestedusesandthecalculationsheetsubmittedforthiswell. Youareherebynotifiecithatyouhavetherighttoappeal il ii
theissuanceof thispermit,byfilingawrittenrequestwiththisofficewithinsixty(60) daysof thecjateofissuance,pursuant il :ito the State Administrative Procedures Act. (See Section 24-4-104 ilrrough 106, C.R a.) /y %-"- z-r-- U z-)f Ofi"e
.PPROVED
DMW
1 6 2001
)".
ecet ISSUE XPIRA
,,r'li
'iii:',i tl"l
State Engineer
:il: ); 3[i'f^"Jb' 5',i^:i6^l?E'Wl+Eil h=rou r,.rb-' ti tl i \l r n * ULJI' Y
8lB Centennial Bldg.,
(303) 866-3581
.r']PLlCAl'lT
GEORGE R I(ILBY
C/O CAI-OIA & HOUPT PC
1204 GRAND AVE
GLEI.IWOOD SPRII.IGS, CO 81601-
(e70) 945-6067
1313 Slrerman St., Denver, Colorado 8l)2C3
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 54868
DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN
Lot: 3 Block: Filing: Subdiv: MAYFLY BEl.lD RANCH
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SW 114 NW 114 Section 36
Towrtslrip 7 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M.
DISTAl'ICES FROM SECTION LINES
,,5OFIJffi
1100 Fl. from Wesl Seclion Line
UTM CCORDINATES
North ing: Easting:PERMIT TO CONSTR CT A WELL
ISSUANCE oF T]-llS PERMIT DOES NoT CONFE:R A WATER RIGHT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) Tltisvrell shall beusedittsttchawayastocausenomaterial injurytoexislingwalerrights. Theissuanceofthispernrit
does not assure the applicant tltat no ittjuty will occur to another vested water right or preclude anollterr owner of a vestecl
r,vater right fronr seeking relief in a civil court action.
2) The constructlon of this vrell shall be in compliance wilh tlre Water Well Construcllon Rules 2 CCR .{02-2, unless approval
of a variance lras been granted by tlre State Board of Examiners r:f Water Well iorrstruction and puntp lnstallation
Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
A,pproved pursttant to CRS 37 -90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water iributary to the Roaring
Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit, on the conriition that tlrewell shall be operated only
rvhen tlte Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water iupply plan, approved by tlre State Engineer, is in eftect and
vrhen a water allotmettt contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy Dlstrict lor the release of
replacemenl v"ater front Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for iaugmentation. BWCD contract /1368.
The use of ground vraler fronl this well is lirnited to ordinary household purposes irrsicle one (1) sinOle family dwelling anrJ
theirrigationof nottttorellranT,500squarefeet(0.17of anacre) of lrornegarclensandlawns. All useof thiswell vrill be
curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect.
The maximum pumping rate of this well slrall not exceed 10 GPM.
The annLlal vrithdrawal of ground water frorn this well shail not r:xceed 0.81 acre-fee,t.
The return flow fronr the use of this well ntust be through an indiviclual waste water rjisposal systern of the
non-evaporative type wltere the water is returned to tlre same slream system in which the well is located.
This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit.
The ovrner slrall rnark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit nunrber(s), name of the aquifer, and cotrrt case
number(s) as appropriate. Tlte owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these nrarkings.
A totalizing flo',v meter must be installecl on tlris well and maintai:red in good workingl order. permanent records of all
ciiversions rnust be rnaintained try tlre rvell owner (recordecj at least annUally) and subrnitted to the Dlvision Engineer upon
reqrrest.
This pernlit has been approved for a pumping rate of 10 GPM and an annual diversron of 0.81 acre-feet based on the
requested uses and tlre calculation sheet submitted for tlris well. You are hereby notified that you have the right to appeal
the issuance of this pernrit, by lilirrg a written request with this office within sixty (60) Cays olthe date of issuance, pulsuant
to the State Administrative Procedures Act. (See Section 24-4-104 through 106, C tt.S.) D-l-,,')-- O2-//./ {4Oo (
4)
s)
6)
7)
B)
e)
10)
11)
,)PROVED
DMW
Engineer
FEB 16DF[:B 1 6 2001
l-rlrrrr tJo.
GWS-25
{PPLICANT
B1B Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 90203
GEORGE R KILBY
C/O CALOIA & HOUPT PC
1204 GRAND AVE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-
(s70) e45-6067
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE 114 NE 1t4 Section 35.
Township 7 S Range 88 W Sixth p.M.
DIST/.NCES FROM SECTION LINES
2600 l=t. from North Section Line
90 Ft. from East Section Line
UTM COORDINATES
Northirrg: Easting:
WELL PERMTT NUMBER _ 54869 - I.___
Subdiv: MAYFLY BEND RAl.lCH
CHANGE OF U XISTING
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) Thisurell shall bettsedinsuchawayastocausenontaterial injrrrytoexistingwatr:rrights. Theissu;rnceofthisperrnit
<loes not assure the applicant that no ilrjury will occur to another rresled water righl. or preclude anot5er owner of a vested
water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
2) The construction of this well shall be in cornpliance with tlre Water Well Constructi,cn Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval
of a variance has been granted by the state Board of Examiners of Water Well bonstruction and pump lnstallation
Conlractors in accordance wilh Rule 18.
3) Approved pursuattt to cRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriatirg grou4d water tributary to 6e Roari,gFork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basalt ConcJuit, on the condition that the well shall be operated only' when the Basalt water Conservancy District's subslitute water supply plan, approved by tlre State Engineer, is in effect and
when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy District for the release ofreplacement v/ater from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. BWCD contract #368.4) Approved for [lre clrange o[ use of an existing well, permit no. 54382-F (canceled).
5) Tlre use of ground water from this wetl is limited to ordinary household purposes insi<le one (1)single farnily dwelling andtlreirrigationoIttotmoretlranT,500squarefeet(0.17of anacre)of honregarrJensiancllawns. All useofthiswell will becurtailed unless tlre v.rater allotntent contract or a plan for arrgnreltation is in effect.6) The nraximurn pur,ping rate of this weil shail not exceed 10 GpM.
7) The annual urithdrawal of ground water fronr this well shall rrot exceed 0.81 acre-fe,et.B) The return flow from tlte use of this well must [-re through an incjivldual wasle water disposal system .llhenon-evaporative type where the water is returned to the same streram system in which ure well is localed.9) This well shall be located not nro,e than 200 feel kom tlre locaticn specified on llris pernrit.
10) The ovrtler shall nrark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court casenumber(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary nreans and precautions; to preserve these markings.11) A totalizing flow nteter ntust be installed on this well ancJ maintained in good workinq order. perma.ent records of alldiversions nrust be mainlained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer Uponrequest.
12) This permit has been approved for a pumping rate of 1o GPM arrJ an annual divers.ion of 0.81 acre-feet basecj on therequested uses and the calculation sheet submilted for tlris well. You are hereby notitied that you lrav,e ilre right to appealtheissuanceofthispermit,byfilingawrittenrequestwiththisofflcewithinsixty(60)daysofthedateofissuance,purs1lant
to the State Adnrinistrative Procedures Act. (See Section 24-4-104 rtrrough 106, C.R; ) zP \ t);'ifi'ZZcA/
,PROVED
DMW
By
EXPIecei. 95003
Slale Engineer
TION DA EB 16 20
SEOJLJTR
Form No.
GWS.25
APqLlCAl.lr
DIU 5 TEL:503-945-5665
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
Oct 23 99 0:44 |'lo .002 P .02
LIC
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
8t8 Centenniji Bldg., t313 Shonnan St,. Denver. Colorado 80203
(303) 86C3581
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
NE 114 SE 114 Section 35
Towns;hip 7 S Range 88 W Sixth P.lvl.
DISTIiNCES FROM S-ECTIOI'J Lll),lES
2700 Ft. from North Section Line
GEORGE R I(ILBY
% CALOIA & HOUPT PC
1204 GRAND
GLENWOOD SPRII'IGS, CO 81
(970) 94s.6067
TO EXP
601 -100 Ft. frotn East
UTM COORDINATES
Northirrg:
Sectlort Line
4)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFI:R A WATER RlGl-tT
goNprTroNs oF APPRo
This wcll shall be used lrr such a way as to cause no material lnjury to existing \^/ater rights. The issuance of tltis perrnit
cloes not as-eL,re the appllcant lhat no injury will occur to.another vested weter right or preclude another owner of a vested
water riglrt fronr seoking relief ln a civil court action.
The construction of this well shall be in complianco wilh the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402'2, untess approval
of a variance has been.grantod by Lhe Statc Board of Examlners of Water Well Construclion and Purrrp lrtstallation
Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuant to CRS 37.90-137(2) for the construction of a well/ground water Pond, appropriatino ground water
tributary to ttre Roaring Fork River, as an allcrnate poini of dlversion to the Basalt Conduit, on the condition ihel lhe
well/pond shall be operated only whon the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by
the Sta(e Engineer, is in offect and vrhen a waler allotment contract betwoen the well owncr and the Basalt Water
(lgnsorvancy District lor lhe reloase of replaconlent waler frorn Ruedi Reservoir is in effecl, or under an approved plan lor
augmenlation. BWCO contract rl36E.
The average annual amount of groun<J watsr to be appropriated shall not exceod 0.5 acre-feet with thc total surface area of
the proposed ground waler pond linrited to 0.19 acrgs,
The use of ground vrater is limited to evaporation. No other use o[ water is allor.ved unloss a permit therelor is approverl.
The owner shall mark ttre well/pond in a conspicuous place vrith well permit nurnber(s) and court case nutntrer(s) as
appropriate. The ovrner shall take necessary means and precautions lo presen/o lhese markings.
Tho ownor shall subnrit, aller iniliation of construction, site plan and cross section drawings on 8-112'x 11" paper
showinq the extent of inlended excavation, the maximunr dopth of the pond, anrl lhe initial static 'r31s1 lgvel,
This well/porrcJ shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specifled on this permit, The boundaries of
the pond shall bs nrore than 600 foet lrorn any oxisting well not owned by the applicant.
The well shall bo constructed and maintalned in accordance with variance no.200 1-1itA. granted by the Board o(
Examiners of Water Well Consl,ruction and Pump lnslallalion Contrac(ors on Ferbruary 8, 2001.
This permit has becn approved for a pond strrfaco area of 0.19 acres (surface;rIea was not specilied by the application).
You aro horeby notitied that you have ths risht to appeal the issuance o[ this pormit. by filing a wrilten request witlr this office
vritftin sixty (60) clays of the dato ot issuance. pur.euant to the State Adrninistrative Procedures Act, (Soe Section 24-4-104
through 106, C.R.S.) ^ -l+D 2'le - )''';21
U
s)
6)
7)
B)
s)
10)
\PPROVED
JD2
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 05s351 E-t
DIV. 5 WD 38 DE:J. BASIN MD
1 6 20011No.046 EXPIRATI TE Eu
S E 0- lrlT l?
Form l.lo.
GWS-25
APPLICAI'lT
4)
s)
6)
'i)
8)
e)
10)
DIU -s TEL:305-945-5665UI..I-IUH OI., I HL, :, IAI E LNGINTER
g^O^LOBADO Dtytstolt oF WATER RESOURCES818 Centenniat Btdg., l3t3 Sherman.St., D-n"ar.'6;olordo 80203(303) 866-358 I
tlc t 23 99 0:45 hlo.0tl2 P.01
Appnbveo welt uocnrroN
GARFIELD COUNI'Y
NVl/ 114 SW 114 Section 36
Torvnship 7 S Range 88 W Sixth p.M.
DISTTANCES FROM SECTtor,l Ltr.lES
2900 Ft. frorn North Section Line
25O Ft. from West Section Line
UTI/ COORDINNTES
GEORGE R I(ILBY'
% C^LOIA & I1OUPT PC
1204 GRAt.tD
GLEI'IWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-
(970) 945-6067
PERM TO E WATER II,I A PI Easting:
lssuAl',cE oF THls Pl:RMtr DoES Nor cor\rFER A WATER RIGHT
coNptTtoNs_oI APPROVAL
This vrell slrall be used irt suclt a rvay as lo cause no material injury ro existing water rights, The issuance olrtSis permitdoes not assure tlre applicant tlrat no lrrJury rvlll occur.lo anorher vesterj water riglrt or preclude anourer orvner ol a vesledwater right from sesking f elief in a civil court action.
Tlte construction of tlris well shall ba in corrrpli;rnce with lhe Water well Constructlon Rules 2 ccR 402-2, r-rntoss approvalof a variance has been granted by the Stale Board of Exanriners of Waler wgll Construction and punp lnslallationContractors in accordarrcg with Rule .lg.
Approvod pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for lho construction of a woll/ground vraler pond, appropriatino ground walertributary to the Roaring Forl'. Rlver, as art alternate point ol diversion to the Basalt Conr,ui(, on the condition that thewell/pond slralt bc operated only when tlre Basall waler conservancy Dlstrlct's substitute rvater supply plan. approved bythe Stato Engirteer. ls ln effect 3p6f wlron a water allotnrenl contract between lhe well owner and lhe Basall waterconsBrvartcy c)istrict for llre release ol replacetnent v/arer lrortr Ruedi Rgscrvoir is in effect, or uncror arr approverJ plan foraugmentelion. BWCD corrlract f/388.
The average annual arnount of gror.lnd v/ateilo be appropriated strall not exceod 0.gl acre-feet rvith the total strrlace areao[ (lre proposed ground watcr pond lirrrited to 0.31 acres.
The tlss of ground wa(er is limited to ovaporation, No otlrer use of vrater is allowed unless a perrnit thorofor is approvoct.Tlte o''vrter shall mark the well/ponrJ in a conspicuous place with well porrnit nt,mbcr(s) and court case nunrber(s) asappropri3[s' The owner shatl lako nocessary,noans and precautions to pres€,rve these markings.
Tlre owner strall subtrrit, atter initialion of consiructiorr. site plan and cross sectlon drawlngs on g-112,, x I .1.. papersho"ving the extent of intenrJed excavation, (lro rrraxirnum depth of the pond, arrd the inilial static water level.This r,oll/pond slrall be construc(ed not rttoro lhan 200 feet from tho location speclfled on this permit. The boundarios ofIlto pond shall be ntore [lrart 600 feet fronr any exis(lng well nol owned by tho applicant.
l'he well sltall be conslructed and mairrtained irr accordance wlth variancc no. 2001.17A, grantcd by the Board olExantiners of Wator Wcll Construclion and Purrrp lnstallation Contractors on February g, 200I,This perrnit has beon approved for a porrd surface aree o10.31 acres (sur{ace area was not specified by Ure application).You are hereby ootitierJ that you havo llre riglrt to appoal the issuance of this permit. by filing a wri((en request with this olficerzi(lrirr -sixty (60) days of the date of issuance, pursuant to the State Administralivo procsdures Act. (soe section 244-104(lrreur1, 106, C.R.S.) "'!+T )-tL-?oo10-
WELL PERMIT NUMBER
DIV, 5 WD 3S
o55352
State f6g1n"s1
DATE ISS i ltl
APPROVED
JD?
1)
2)
3)
ggJrJGrTftQlltuat z& lv'tJ yrv Mtu\
STATE OF COLOTUDO
1FFICE OF THE STATE ENGINER
vision of Water Regources
/epartmcnt of Nailral Resources
l3I3 Shermrn Street, Room 818
Deowr, Colorado 80203
Phone: (3031 E66-3561
FAX: (3o:!) 866-3589
hnp/Arater.slat!.co.u{defau lt.htm
Kit Lyon, Senior Planner
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 8th St Ste 303
GlenWood Springs CO 81601
Bill O.lcrr+
Concma
November 7, 2000
Mayfly Bend Ranch SuMivision Prelimanary Ptan
NEy"SE%Sec. 35 & NW%SW% Serc. 36, T7S, RE8W, 6t'P.M.
W. Division 5, W. District 38
Dear Ms. Lyon:
We have reviewed the addltional information regarding the above reftrenced proposal to
subdivide a 40.61-acie parcel into four residential lots of about fr:ur actes each, a 3'03 acre
parcel for a bam, storaje area and employee living quarters, and about 21 ecres of hay fields .
inO p"itur". Afthoughtonflicting informaiion was provided in the submittal, we have assumed
that each of the four residential lots will be include a single family reslden@, an accessory
O*"f fing, and 3,750 square feet of lawns and gardens. Wells to be constructecl under Permit
t*tos. SiiAZ-F and 54383-F, issued pursuant to a contract with the Basalt Water Conservanry
District (the District), are proposed to supply waterfor the development. The wells are to
provide water for aiotat ot eignt single-family dwellings, the emFrloyee living quarters, 15'000
square feet of lawns and gardens, and up to ten livestock units. The District contracl also
iniluoes provisions to proiiOe replacement water for evaporatiorr from a pond or ponds with a
total surface area of 0.S acres. information has been supplied ilrdicating that the applicant
owns 2 cfs of the Slough Ditch and Banning Lateral water rights, whlch will be_ used to oontinue
irrigation of the hayfields and pasture. Sewage will be through irndividual septic syStems-
Well permit nos. 54382-F and 54383-F were issued by this office on.August 22, 2000,
pursuant to contracts with the District. The combined uses of the wetl permits allou for a total of
nine single-family dwellings, 15,000 square feet of lawn and garden, and 20 horses, which ls
aOequai'e for the propose-d uses. Horever, rrrre have not receivedl a Pump lnstallation Report or
siati*ent of Benefidial Use for these wells, tf these doorments are not receive prior to August
22.2OO1, the well permib will expire and be of no effect.
A welt test completed by the Samuelson Pump Company indicates that the wetlwith
permit No. 54382-F produced 28 gallons per minute over a four hour period on August 29,
2000. With adequaie storage capacrty tlris well should provide an adequate supply for the
proposed use.
per review of the well construction information, the ground water table in this area
appears to be within 4 to I feet of the surface. Based on the prroposed depth of 10 feet
pr*iOeO in the First Amended Application for Surface Water Rllhb lnd Water Storage Rights,
itt" p"rAfi) will intercept ground'water. Pursuant to Colonado State Statute the exposure of
-
grorjnO water is considered a wetl, and must be permitted by this office priortoonstruction, An
Ipplication for a pond, in the name of George R. Kilby, was received by this ofiice on November
C,rrg E. Wrlchcr
Exesnive Dirslor
Hal D. Slrnooar, Pl.
$rtc Brginccr
Re:
t;rry gl ew 4v'.ru vav mlu\ lgg\*J 4 g s7 r.(JJa
Garfield County Building and Planning
Mayfly Bend Ranch Subdivision Preliminary Plan
November 7,2O0O
1,2000. Also note that the waterrights application should be amerncted to daim a ground water
right for the pond in place of the storage righl
Our reoords also indicate that the well with Permit No. 99585 may be located within the
proposed development. lf located as such, this well must be re-permitted and included in either
the District's substitute supply plan or an augrnentation plan, or it must be plugged and
abandoned upon approvalof the subdivision.
Based on the above, it is our opinion, pursuant to Sectiorr 30-2&136(1XhXl), that the
proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights, and is adequate,
so long as wel! permits are obtained for the pond(s), valid well permits are maintained for all of
the wells, no expanded use of the applicants interest in the Slough Ditch ancl Banning Lateral
water rights occurt, and the disposition of Permit No, 99585 is resolved as statecl in the
preceding paragraph. lf you or the applicant has any questions oonoeming this matter, please
contaet Craig Lis of this office for assistance.
Sincerely,
Kenneth W. Knox
Assistant State Engineer
KWlVCMUMayfly Bend Ranch iii-doc
cc: Alan Madellaro, Acting Division Engineer
Joe Bergquist, Water Commissioner, District 38
DRAINAGE STWY
FOR
MAYFLY BEND MNC:H
GARFIELD, COLOMDO
PREPARED FOR:
GEORGE R. KILBY
505 SA}.IDY LA}.IE
A}IMSTON, AL 36247
SUBMTTED TO:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNNVG DEPARTMENT
109 8TH STREET, SI.IITE IOO-C
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601-3360
PREPARED BY:
Sopris Engineering, LLC
SE JobNo. 20065.01
August 8,2001
John E. Kornfeld, P.E.Yancy Nichol, P.E.
502 Main Street. Suite A3 . Carbondale, C0 81623 . (970) 704-031 I . Fax (970) 704-0313
$oPRIS EHGI]IEERIlIG 11G civil consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTIi
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PI.]RPOSE
2.0 EXISTTNG DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
Onsite Hydrologic Conditions
Offsite Hydrologic Conditions
Combined Onsit+.Offsite Peak Discharge Rates
3.0 DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN
4.0 ANALYSIS METHODS AND ASSTJMPTIONS
5.0 SUMMARY
VTCINITY MAP
EXHIBIT I - EXISTING DRAINAGE
EXHIBIT 2 - DEYELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN
APPENDIX I EXISTING DRAINAGE CAICULATIONS I\.ND HYDROLOGIC
DATA
APPENDIX U DEVELOPED DRATNAGE CALCULATIOT\IS AND
HYDROLOGIC DATA
APPENDIX III RAINFALL TNTENSITY _ DURATION - FR,EQIjENCY CURVES
Pse
3
3
3
4
5
5
6
7
1.0 INTRODUCTION AI\D PI]RPOSE
The Mayfly Bend Ranch is located in Garfield County, about 1l'z miles east of Carbondale,
Colorado. The proposed development lies north of County Roarl 100.
The planned development consists of five (5) single family lots. The total area of the Mayfly
Bend Ranch is approximately 40.6 acres.
The purpose of the drainage study is three-fold:
o First, to determine the additional runoffrate ttrat may be expected due to
development.
o Secondly, to determine the volume of stormwater detention that may be necessary to
maintain the historical peak runoff and stormwater volume.
. Thirq to meet compliance of approved drainage standards per Land Use Regulations
for Garfreld County.
2.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDMONS AIYD FEATT'RES
Onsite Hydnologic Conditions
The project site consists of 40.6 acres. The parcel consists of undeveloped property with native
vegetation. There are not any improved roads that access this property from County Road 100.
See the attached Vicinity Map.
The land slopes to the northwest. The slopes average I percent. Vegetation consists of pine and
cottonwoodtrees, native shrubs, and grasses.
The site consists of two primary drainage basins, namely lB and 2B. Basin lB drains the
northeastem third of the parcel and Basin 28 drains the remaining area. Refer to Exhibit I -
Existing Drainage.
Several irrigation ditches traverse the properly. The largest irrigation ditctr, named Banning
Lateral, enters the parcel near the southeast corner of the parcel, and drains more-or-less westerly,
exiting the property on the site's west boundary. The Banning Lateral captures most of the
stormwater drainage from Basin 28, and subsequently the offsite Basin 2A.
The smaller interior irrigation ditches also drain in a westerly directiorL north of the Banning
Lateral. The unnamed ditch north of the Banning Lateral intercepts most of the stormwater
drainage from Basin lB.
Runoffcurve number '65' represents the majority of the existing hydrologic conditions. This
curve number represents woodland-grass combination in fair cor:rdition with "B" hydrologic soils.
The time of concentration for the stormwater to travel from the nrost hydraulically remote part of
the drainage area to the point of concentration varies from about 39 to 48 minutes. The time of
concentration consists of sheet flow, shallow conoentrated flows, and channelized flow. Please
3
refsr to Section 4.0 Analysis Methods and Assumptions for the rletails pertaining to the methods
and input parameters.
The peak discharges generated onsite for the 25-yar and 100-ymr design storms are:
Drainage Area 25Yenr -24 Hour 100 Yenr - 24 Hour
Design Storm (cfs) Desig! Storm (cfs)
Hydrologic data calculations for the onsite existing conditions are included in Appendix I.
I 00 -Year Flo odpl ain Affecting Onsite D evelopment
A portion of the north edge of the property is identified as lying within the 100-year floodplain.
The floodplain is shown on the grading plan. This boundary andtthe 100-year liater surface
elevations are from the 1982 Colorado Study for Garfield Counlg. The floodplain delineation and
the base flood elevations correspond well with the 100-year flooiJplain information from the 1986
FEMA maps (sheet 1880 of 1900).
."7!e qradtng planfor the subdivision should consider runofr,through the pojed ond at
individual sita." All structures should be located outside of the 100-year nooaitain. eU
finished floor elevations of structures in the project will be abovo the i0Olear water surface
elevation.
Oft ite Eydrologic Conditions
The site is subject to offsite drainage from the southeast and east. Two drainage areas drain to the
site's east boundary. Area lA drains to Area lB and Area2Adrains to Area iB, *hi.h th"n
drains into the Banning Lateral. A third drainage area, designated 34 and 38, drains to the
southwestern corner of the site, and empties into the Banning Lateral.
Another irrigation ditctr, named Slough Ditcb flows east to wes! and lies between the subject
parcel and County Road 100.
As the existing hydrologic conditions of the offsite drainage are \rery similar to the onsite
conditions, the offsite peak runoffrates are also relativelylow. Thepeak discharges generated
offsite for the 25-yeu and 100-year design storms are:
Drainage Area 25 Ye,ar - 24 Hour 100 Yearr - 24 Hour
Design Storm (cfs) Desien iStorm (cfs)
5
8
IB
2B
2
J
IA
2A
3A
3B
4
I
5
0
2
2
1
13
0
5
5
Hydrologic data calculations for the offsite existing conditions are included in Appendix II.
offsite drainage arca 4 affects the access road from County Road 100 to the parcel. This drainage
is discussed further in the Developed Drainage Section.
Combined OnsiteOffsite Peak Dlscharge Rates
The combined peak runoffrates for the offsite and onsite drainage basins are shown below:
Drainage Area 25 Year - 24 Hour 100 Year-24 Hour
IA
1B
Combined
2A
28
Combined
3A
3B
Combined
Combined
4
2
5
7
l3
8
2t
0
5
6
27
5
I
)
J
5
J
8
0,,
2
l0
0
3.0 FOST DE\MLOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN
A proposed access road-linls the subject site to County Road 100. The new roadway is planned
to be a chipped-and-sealed surfaced. The roadway is ipproximarlely 1700 linear feeito t-he parcel
boundary.
The development consists of 5 lots. Lot sizes range from 3.0 to z[. ] acres. Remaining areas of theparcel include open arqN, wetlands, ponds, and rJadways. Refer to Exhibit 2 - Deve-lopedDrainage Plan.
Due to the size of the lots, much of the surface area within the parcel will remain in the nativestate. Estimated runoff curve number for developed conditions ir; 66. This value is based on thefollowing assumptions :
Impervious Surfaces per Developed LotRoofAreas 3000 square feetDriveway 2500 square feotPatio/Sidewalks/etc. 1000 square feert
Total Impervious per Lot 6500 squarefeet
The access roadways to each lot were also included for the weighted runoffcurve number of 66.All other areas are assumed to remain natural, i.e., curve numbJr 65, or replaced with landscapingwith a curve number of 65 or less, such as turf.
The general drainag6 plan includes establishing a finish floor elevation at least 1.0 feet above the
adjacent high ground of each lot. The overall drainage pattern under developed conditions will
not change.
The combined peak runoffrates for the offsite and onsite drainage basins are shown below:
Drainage Area 25 Year - 24 Hour 100 Y,ear-24 Hour
r Storm (cfs)
2
IB
Combined
2A
2B
Combined
0
5
6
)1
5
2
3
5
4
8
0
.,
2
1l)
3A
3B
5
7
l3
9.ta
LL
Combined
Combined
4
Detention
Based upon the densrty of the proposed developmenl the change in the peak runoffrates above
the existing hydrologic conditions are minimal. In fact, no increase in peak runoffrates occurred,
except for Basin 2B. The overall increase was I cfs.
To compensate for the minor increase, the pond to the farthest erst (which fills with irrigation and
stormwater, will act as the facility providing detention. Some capacity is available between the
normal operating elevation and the overflow elevation to detain stormwater.
Culverts
The minimum culvert size for the grading and drainage plan is an 18" cmp. Based on a minimum
slope of 0.5 percent and one foot of head above the crown of the pipe inlet (inlet control), an l8-
inch cmp will convey l0 cfs. Refer to the attached culvert analysis sheet. This flow rate exceeds
the 1O0-year peak runoffrate above the pipe installation locations.
4.0 ANALYSIS MEIHODS AIID ASSUMPTIONS
TheNRCS TR55 method was used for the time of concentration calculations. The US Army
Corps of Engineer's HEC-I software was used to estimate peak:runoffrates of individual
drainage basins and the combined hydrographs.
The design storms used for this analysis include the 25-year and the 100-year frequency events,
based on the 24-hour duration. The precipitation data is based on the Hydrain-Drainage Design
Systems, of the Federal Highway Administration. A copy of the precipitation data is included in
Appendix tII.
Runoffcurve numbers used to calculate the peak discharges include the following:
Surface Tvpe RunoffCurve Number
Existing Woodland-Grass with Fair Condition, 65
"B" hydrologic soils
Proposed Asphalt & Impervious Surfaces 9g
5.0 ST]MMARY
The resuls from this drainage study suggest that no long-ternL adverse impacts to drainage areanticipated with the development of the Mayfly Bend R-anch subdivision.
-
Although onsite peak discharges will increase stightly with devtdopmen! i.e., increase of I cfs,no detention is proposed with this development.
Since disturbance to the_surface is only proposed in the building envelope area and the accessroadway, the historica!.drainage pattern will be maintained- Colmpliance with Garfield CountyDrainage Standards will be adhered.
.".\\$
aa
lt
t
o
E
l!l.rtt
--\- Po'.o€\ r^3-i=-----
| '..
| ""'... :: i!l--.------*- -1i-
tr.i%,I .-2t(
f ---:1.==="=
_---+r'---:4 |i (p
I
i
I
I
I ' - s\---'i
I
I
- o't'
;!t'.i,t:,it!
. tJ)rl\
(O nAcn V,
q
PIPE CULVERT AI.IATYSIS
COMPI.TIATION OF CULVERT PEREOR.!4ANCE CURVE
August 7, 200t
=========================-==-=========================================:=======
PROGRAM INPU? DATA
DESCRIPTION
Culvert Dianeter (ft)
$fiim, Chart Number.
FHIIA Scale Number (Type of cu]vert Entrance)
Manning's Roughness Coefficient (n-value) ......
Entrance Loss Coefficient of Culvert Openingr.Culvert Length (ft)..
fnvert Elevation at Downstream end of Culvert (ft)
Invert Elevation at Upstream end of Culvert (ft)..
Culvert Slope (tt./tEl
Starting flow Rate (cfs).
fncremental Flow Rate (cfs).
Ending FIow Rate (cfs).
Starting lailwater Depth (ft) ..
Incremental Tailwater Depth (ft1 ..
Ending Tailwater Depth (ft1 ..
1.5
2
3
0.024
0.5
s0.0
100.0
100. 25
0. 005
1.0
L.0
2t.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
-==================================================================-=-=-===
COMPUTATION RESULTS
Elow Tailwater Headwater (ft) Normal Critical Depth at OutletRate Depth rnl.et outret Depth Depth outLet veloci-ty(cfs) (ft) control Control (ft) (fr) (fr) (fps)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.4
8.0
9.0
10.0
11. 0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16. 0
17. 0
18 .0
19. 0
20.0
21.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 .52
0.7'7
0.99
1.19
1.39
1.58
1.78
2.02
2.24
2.58
2.95
3.36
3.8
4.28
4.79
5.34
5.92
6.54
1.2
7.89
I .62
0.59
0. 86
1. 08
1.29
1.5
1.73
1. 85
2.17
2.53)o
3.32
3.7 6
4.23
4.72
5.25
5. 82
6.41
7.05
'7.72
8.41
9. L5
0. 51
0.75
0.97
L.22
1.5
1.5
l_. 5
1.5
1.5
L.5
1.5
L.5
1.5
1E
1.5
1.5
1.5
1E
1.5
1E
1.5
0.37
0.53
0 .66
0.77
0. 86
0. 9s
t.02
1.1
1. 16
1.22
1.27
1 .31
1.35
1.38
1.41
1.42
L .44
1.45
1.46
1.41
t.4't
0. 37
0.53
o .66
0.77
0.86
0.95
t.o2
1.1
1. 1,6
1.22
1".27
1.3r.
1 .35
1. 38
1,.4L
1, .42
I .44
1. 45
7.46
1.4?
t.4'7
,o,
3.55
4 .02
4. 41
4.17
5.11
5.44
5.78
6. L3
6.5
6.89
7.31
7.76
8.23
o 1a
9.23
9. 75
10.29
10. 83
11.38
1r..93
===================================:=:=:=========
TITDROCAIC Hydraulics
Dodson & Associates,
Phone: (28L) 440-3787,All Rights Reserved.
for Windows, Version 1.2a Copyright (c) Lgg6Inc., 5629 lll 1960 West, Suite 3L4, Houston, TX 71069Fax: (281) 440-41 42, Ema1l : software@dodson-hydro. com
,' Pd!l! I
/ 0., Sec*o EhFilct
tm tErn [m
DRAINAGE E/S//V,S
1A
1B
2A
2A
3A
3B
4
7.3 ACRES.14.1 ACRES
40.1 ACRES
26.5 ACRES
1.2 ACRES
18.1 ACRES
16.4 ACRES
OFFSITE BASIN
ONSITE BASIN
OFFSITE BASIN
ONSITE BASIN
OFFSITE BASIN
OFFSITE BASIN
OFFSITE BASIN
Q?rr
P, t'.r
-
DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE
..'"?"r"-"-"''
GRAPHIC SCAIE
EXHIBIT 1
EXISTING DRAINAGE
(rxEiTl
t larh - 200 [
GOY.T U}T 84
covT mT 8s
( "-\
)
.-__)
l\
I''l.'nti
I
rl
R\ -,,>\.
t',
28 ../
z-_---
:---*-}-i1.
'r----------!'.,
---r' ..)--'
T
'-J
\
"r..38
(
\-:
/lIt ' /t./ ,, iI r'-.. -. '\
r--', )i
-.) -_-,./ I
( -,, '.,1
____----/
\
t-'\
\----
Pat'r \
.r' 0., $bdla6 Euil6 !arr
,: -_-_--.''=
EXHIBIT 2
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE
GOY'T IIN E4
GOY,T U)T Eg
REFER TO GRAOING ANO DRAINAGE PLlr{
li
t-\ii>.
,,,'l:. l
.Y-' \ / -)t'-;-'ililltE( ,'?/
W*(o ,\__---_-_-
r.----' \-----1.--
\) -K
i'r:i ..-'-'')
=+--.-- --' _.) '
tA{
^,1 ,,i
_tl
,.1._ .r'
.jn#
rii
K-=- !._ i
'.__-),t;,
-,,1
GRAPHIC SCAI.Ei
(rxtltr)
lluL-E@ft.
APPENDD( I
EXISTING CALCULATIONS AND HYDROLOGIC DATA
TABIII,AR IIYDROGRAPH METHOD
Uz>
Version 2.00
'roject : I'IAYFLY BEND RANCHrnty : GARFIELD
User: iIEKSEate: CO Checked:
Date:
Dat.e:.otiI.le : EXISTING HPRoI.,oGIc coNDITIoNs
Total watershed area: 0.193 sq mi Rainfall Lrce: rI Frequency: 25 years--;-----;;-----;-----;;- subareas -;;- -- --;
Area(sg mi) 0.01* 0.02* o.05* o.04* O.OO* O.03* O.03*Rainfall (in) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2 .3 2.3 2.3 2.3Cunre number 55* 65* 65* 65* 65* G5* 65*Runoff(in) 0.23 a.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23Tc (hrs) O .74* 0 .65* o .79* o .79* o .54* O. g7* o.79*(Used) 0 .7s O .7s O . zs O. 25 0.75 O .75 O .75TimeTooutret 0.00 0.00 0 . oo 0 . oo 0. oo o. oo o. oota/P O .47 O .47 O .47 O .47 O .47 0.47 O.47
Time Total - Subarea ConEribut,ion to Tot,a1 FIow (cfs)(hr) Flow 1A 18 2A 28 3A 38 4
11.0 0 0 0 o o oP O OL1.3 0 0 0 o o o o 01L.6 o 0 0 o o o o o11.9 0 0 0 0 o o o o12.0 0 0 0 o o o o o12.1, 0 0 0 o o 0 0 012.2 0 0 0 o o o o o3000ooooo
L2.4 2 0 0 1 l_ o o o12.5 6 0 1P 2 1 o ].P 1PL2.6 7 0 1 2 2P O l_ Ll-2.7 9P 1P 1 3P 2 o 1 L12.8 9 1 I 3 2 0 1 113.0 8 0 1 3 2 0 1 L13.2 6 0 1 2 1 o 1 l_13.4 6 0 1 2 1 0 1 L
13.6 6 0 1 2 1 o 1 L13.8 4 0 0 1 l_ o 1 L14.0 4 0 0 1 1 o l_ L1_4.3 2 0 0 1 1 o 0 014.5 2 0 o 1 l_ o o 015.0 2 0 0 1 L O O O15.5 2 0 0 1 1 o 0 o16.0 1_ 0 o 1 o o o o
15.5 1 0 o 1 o o o oL1.O 1 0 0 l_ o o o o1-7.5 L 0 o 1 o o o o18.0 L 0 o 1 o 0 o o19.0 0 0 o o o o o o00oooo0oo)0000oooo2o.0 0 0 O O O O O O
P - Peak Flow * - value(s) provided from TR-55 system rouEines
TTME OF CONCENTRATION AND TR.AVEIJ TTME
Project : IvIAYFLY BEND RANCHlnty : GARFIETD St.ate: CO.It,iI1e : EXISTTNG mDRoLoGIc CoNDrTroNs
Subarea #1Flow T)pe 2 year Length Slope Surfacerain (fr) (ftlfE) code
User:
Checked:
- ;;;;--- ;;---;;i;;i;;- ;il;(sq/f t,) (f tr) (f r/sgs) (hr)
Version 2.0A
Dat,e:
Dat,e:
1A
n
Sheet,2.30 100
Shallow Concent'd S00
Open Channel 900
.01
.01
H
U
0.557
0.086
2 .5 0.100Time of ConcenErat,ion = 0.74*
=====
Area wp VelociEy Time(sqlrr) (fr) (f r/sec) (hr)
;;;;-**;' -' ;-;;;;- --;;;;;; - ;r3l:.'3i,13"; ",,rain (fr) (ft/tt) code
Sheet,2 .30 100
Shallow Concent,'d 5OO
.0L5
.0r-
H
u 0.474
0.086
0.089
= 0.65*
Open Channel 800
;,,p; --;-;;;;---il;;;i---'r3I3"'Ei'13";
rain ( f t) (ft/ 2y'1 code
2A-n Area Wp Velocity Time(sq/fr) (fr) (fElsec) (hr)
2.5Time of Concentratsion
Sheet, 2.3 100 .01Shallow Concenttd S0O .01-
Open Channel 1300
H
U
0.557
0.085
0.]-44
= O.'79*
2.5Time of Concentration
;;;;-'r,p;---; ;;;; --;;;il- ;r#:"'Ei,f3"; 28
rain (fr) (frlir) code "---;;;;--- ;;---;;i;;;;- ;il;(sq/fr) (fr) (frlsec) (hr)
Sheet 2 .30 100Shallow Concent'd 500
Open Channel 1300
.01-
.01
H
u
0.557
0.086
0.L44
3:l3l
2.5Time of Concent,ration =
* - Generat,ed for use by TABULAR method
,IEK
TIME OF CONCEMTRATTON AIiID TRAVEL TTME
''oject : II{AYFI,Y BEND RANCHnty : GARFIELD SE.aE,e: CO
-*otiLle : EXISTING IIEROLOGIC CONDITIONS
Subarea #5Flow Type 2 year I-rengt,h Slope Surfacerain (f r) (ftr/ ftr) code
User: iIEK
Checked:
3A-n Area wp Velocity Time(sq/ft) (f r) (f r/sec) (hr)
Version 2.00
Dat,e:
Dat,e:
Sheet 2.30
Shallow ConcenL'd
100
500
.0L
.0r_
H
U
0.557
0.086Time of Concentration = 0.64*
=====
n Area Wp Velocity Time(sq/ft) (fL) (ftlsec) (hr)
;i;; **;-'-;;;;; - ;;;;;;- -;,:s"'Ei.f5.;
rain (ft) (f t/f t,) code
Sheet,2 .30
Shallow Concent td
Open Channel
100
s00
2 000
.0L H.01 U
0.5s7
0.0862.s 0.222Time of Concent.ration = O. 87*
=====
Area Wp Velocity Time(sq/f r) (f r) (f r/sec) (hr)
;-*;;- --; ;;;; --;;;il---;idy"5ii,xl.- n,,
rain (ft) (frlfr) code
Sheet 2 .30
Stra].l-ow Concentr'd
Open Channel
.01
.0L
Codes
F Grass,
G Grass,
H liloods,I Woods,J Range,
100
500
120 0
H
U
o-557
0.086
2 .s 0.133
Time of ConcenEraEion = 0.78*
=====
Sheet Flow SurfaceA Smooth Surface
B Fallow (No Res. )
C Cultivated < 20 t Res.
D Cult.ivated > 20 t Res.
E Grass-Range, Short.
Dense
Burmuda
Light
Dense
Natural
Shallow Coneent,rated
Surface Codes
P Paved
U Unpaved
* - Generated for use by TABITLA,R meEhod.
- 'cjecE
mEy
DubEit,Ie
Subarea
MA,YFLY BEND RANCH
GARFTEI,D STaTe: CO
EXISTING ITDROLOGIC COIIDITIONS
1A
RUNOFF CURVE NT]MBER COMPI'TATION Version 2.00
ED CURVE NUMBER: 65
COVER DESCRTPTION
OTHER AGRICULfi'RAL IJANDS
Woods - grass combinat,ion fair 7.3
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 7.3 AcTes
User: itEK
Checked:
7.3
Dat,e:
DaEC:
RUNOFF CURVE NT'MBER
- -oject : MAYFLY BEND RANCHmty : GARFIELD SEate: CO
-*ot,itIe: EXTSTING IIrcROLOGIC CONDITTONS
Subarea : 3A
COVER DESCRIPTION
COMPUTATION Version 2.00
Date:
Date:
HydroI
B
c Soil Group
C
(cN)
OTHER AGRICULTT]RAI, I,ATIDS
Woods - grass combinat,ion fair
Tot,a1 Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 1..2 AcTes
1.2
CIIRVE NUMBER: 65
t -2 (65
RI'NOFF CURVE NT'MBER COMPUTAT]ON
nroject : i'IAYFLY BEND RANCH,unty : GARFIETD State: CO&E,itle : EXISTING IIIDROLOGIC CONDITTONSSubarea : 38
Version 2.00
Dat.e:
Dat,e:
CO\IER DESCRIPTION ic Soil GroupCDs (CN)
OTHER AGRICULTT'RAL I,JANDS
Woods - grass combinaEion fair
Total Area (by UyArologic SoiI Group)
- 18.1(e
18.l_
SUBAREA: 38 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 18.1 Acres WEIGHTED CtRvE NUMBER: 65
User:
Checked:
RUNOFF CTIRVE NI'MBER COMPTTTATION Version 2.00
-'cjecE : IIAYFLY BEND RANCH User: JEK DaEe:mty : GARFIELD SLate: CO Checked: _ DaEe:
>urbtitle : EXISTING IIYDROTOGIC CONDITfONS
Subarea : 4
COVER DESCRIPTION
Hydrologic Soil GroupABCDAcres (CN)
OTHER AGRICT'LTTIRAL IJANDS
Woods - grass combinauion fair
Total Area (by uydrologic Soil Group)
- 16.4 (65) -
L6.4
SIJBAREA: 4 TOTAI DRAINAGE AREA: 16.4 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 65
rn FB
*****************************************
f, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ** HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER ** 609 SECOND STREET ** DAVTS, CALIFORNIA 95616 ** (9161 750-1104 ***
f, t***************t*********************
PAGE 1
5
lt**************t*******************t*******
* FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-1) *
* SEPTEMBER 1990* VERSION 4. O
* RUN DATE 08/06/2007 TIME*
*
*
*
11:38:39 *
*
******************************+**********
LINE
ID
ID
ID
ID
*D]AGRAM
IT
IO
xxxx
xxxxxxx
x
x
xxxx
x
x
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
x
x
xx
xxxxx
x
xx
xxxxxx x
x
x
xxx
x
x
x
THIS PROGRAM REPLACES Al,L PREVIOUS VERSTONS OF HEC-I KNOWN AS HEC1 (JAN 73), HECIGS, HECIDB, AND HECIKW.
THE DEFTNITTONS OE VARIABLES -RTIMP- AND -RTIOR- HAVE C}TANGED FROM THOSE USED WITH THE 1g?3-STYI,E TNPUT STRUCTURE.THE DEFINITION OF -AMSKK- ON RM-CARD WAS CHANGED WTTH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE TORTRANTT VERSIONNEW OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTELOW SUBMERGENCE , SINGLE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION| DSS:WRTTE STAGE EREQUENCY,DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESTRED CA],CULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATIoN
KINEMATIC WAVE: NEW EINITE DIEEERENCE ALGORITHM
5
6
1
3
4
"l
I
9
10
11
MAYFLY BEND RANCH
EXISTING HYDROLOGIC COND]TIONS
25 YEAR - 24 HOUR DESIGN STORM
5
E
4AUGO1 1200 300
KK 1A
BA .011
PH
LS
uD 0.444
L2
13
l4
KK
BA
LS
1B
. o22
65
55
0. 41 o.77 t.32 1.70 1 - 84 2.O8 2.22 2 -30
15
16
L7
18
19
20
2L
22
23
24
25
26
21
2A
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
LINE
40
41
12
43
44
UD
KK
HC
KK
BA
LS
UD
KK
BA
ts
UD
KK
HC
0.390
COMBINE DRAINAGE AREA I
2
2A
.063
o.4"7 4
2B
. 041
o.4'7 4
65
KK
BA
LS
UD
KK
BA
LS
UD
KK
HC
KK
HC
COI,IBINE DRAINAGE AREA 2
2
3A
.002
65
0. 384
3B
.028
65
o.522
COMBTNE DRATNAGE AREA 3
2
CO}4BINE DRAINAGE AREAS 2 AND 3
2
HEC-1 INPUT
(-.->} DIVERSION OR PUMP FLO9V
(<---, RETURN OF DIVERTED OR PTJ],4EED ELOW
PAGE 2
KK4BA .026
LSuD 0.468
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF STREAM NETWORK
65
rNPUT
LINE
NO.
1
L2
(VI ROUTING
(. ) CONNECTOR
'1
.18
40
(***) RUNOEE ALSO COMPUTED AT THIS LOCATION
1**************+***********************l****
* ELOOD HYDROGRAPH PACI(AGE (HEC-l} "* SEPTEMBER 1990 *
* VERSION 4.0 **** RUN DATE OB/06/2001 TrME 11:38:39 ***
*****************************************
* U.S. AR},{Y CORPS OF ENGINEERS *
* HYDROLOG]C ENGINEERING CENTER *
* 609 SECOND STREET *
* DAVTS, CALIFORNTA 95515 *
' (9161 756-1104 ***
* ** * *** * * * t* * * * * * * * * * * I ** * * ** * * * * * i * + t** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * I i ** * * * * *** ** * * ** *
MAYFLY BEND RANCH
EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
25 YEAR - 24 HOUR DESIGN STORM
6 IO OUTPUT CONTROL VARTABLES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL
IPLOT O PLOT CONTROT
OSCAL O, HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
HYDROGMPH TIME DATA
NMIN 5 MINUTES IN COMPUTATION INTERVAI.
rDATE 4AUG 1 STARTING DATE
IT
16 COMBTN.
18 '. 2A
?B.),
26
28
32
36
38
.38
EOMBIN.
rTTME 12OO STARTING TIMENO 3OO NUMBER OE HYDROGRAPH ORDINATESNDDATE sAUG 1 ENDING DATE
NDTIME 1255 ENDING TIMEICENT 19 CENTURY MARK
COMPUTATION INTERVAI .08 HOURS
TOTAL TIME BASE 24.92 HOURS
ENGLISH UNITS
DRAINAGE AREA SQUARE MILES
PRECIPITATION DEPTH INCHES
LENGTH, ELEVATION EEET
FLOW CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
STORAGE VOLUME ACRE-FEET
SURFACE AREA ACRES
TEMPERATURE DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
RI.JNOFE SI,,IMMARY
FLOW IN CUBIC EEET PER SECOND
TIME IN HOURS, AREA IN SOUARE MILES
PEAK TIME OF AVERAGE FLOW EOR I.IAXTMUM PERIOD BASIN MAXII.{I,IM TIME OFoPERATION STATION F-LOtit PEAK AREA STAGE MAX STAGE6-HOUR 24-HOUR 72-HOUR
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COMBINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COI4BINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGMPH AT
2 COMBINED AT
2 COMBINED AT
1A 1. t2.75
1B 2. 12.67
coMBIN 3. t2.61
2A 5. 12.83
28 3. 12. 83
coMBIN 8. 12.83
3A 0. 12.61
38 2. 12.83
coMBlN 2. t2.e3
coMBIN 10. t2.83
l.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.
1.
2.
0.
1.
1.
0. .01
0. .o2
0. .03
0. .06
0. .04
1. . L0
0. -00
0. .03
0. .03
1. .133.1.
HYDROGRAPH AT
*** NORMAL END OE HEC-1
4 2. L2-75 1. 0. o. .03
TABI'LAR ITYDROGRAPH METHOD
EY/Oo
Version 2.00
^roject : IIAYFLY BEIID RANCHrnLY : GARFIELD SEaUe: CO
2B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
User: JEK
Checked:
3A 38
Date:
Dat,e:
-*btitle: EXTSTING HIIDROLOGIC COIIDITIONS
Total waEershed area:0.193 sq mi Rainfall tl4)e: II Frequency:1-00 years
Subareas1A182A283A384
Area(sq mi) 0.01* 0.02* 0.06* 0.04* 0.00* O.03* O.03*Rainfall (in) 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3 .0 3.0 3.0 3. O
Curve number 55* 65* 65* 65* 65* G5* G5*
Runof f (in) 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48Tc (hrs) 0 .58* 0 .59* 0 -72* 0 .72* 0 .59* o. g0* 0.71*(Used) 0.7s 0.50 0.75 0.?5 0.50 O.7S O.zsTimeToOut,let 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.OO O.OO O.OO O.OOta/P 0 .37 0 .37 O .37 O .37 O .37 O.3z O .32
Time Tot,al - Subarea Contribution to Total Flow (cfs)(hr) Flow
1r_.0
11.3
11.6
11.9
]-2.0
t2.L
1) )
3
:l-2.4
]-2.5
]-2.6
t2.7
12.8
13 .0
L3.2
13 .4
13 .6
13 .8
r-4.0
t4.3
1,4 .6
15 .0
r-5 .5
15.0
16 .5
t7 .o
17 .5
18 .0
19.0
0
0
26.O
0
0
0
0
0
0
2I
1A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L6 l-2L125L28P 2P26220 l-L4 l_r_3 L
1B
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
4P
4
4
3
2
2
l"
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
3
4P
3
3
2
2
1
L
1
1
1
L
1
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
4P
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1-
t-
1
1
OP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
5
6P
6
4
3
3
2
2
2
1,
l-
1
L
L
2A
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
4
6I
9P
9
7
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
r-0
9
7
6
6
6
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
0
L
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1_
1
1
L
1-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
L
1
1
1
L
0
1
L
L
L
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P - Peak Flow * - value (s) provided from fR-55 syst,em routines
,rlrTeu
1* * * * * * * t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * +* *****
* FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-l) * * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENG]NEERS *
* SEPTEMBER 1990 * * HYDROLOGfC ENGINEERING CENTER *
* VERSTON 4.0 * * 609 SECOND STREET *
* \ * * DAVIS, CALTFORNIA 95616 *
* RUN DATE 18/O6/2OOL TIME 13:36:18 * * (916) 756-1104 *
t+**
** ***** *** * ** **** ***** ** *** ********* * * * * * **** * ** * *** **** ** * * **** i****** * *** * * t* t
x x xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx xx x x
xxxxxxx xxxx x xxxxx xx xx x xx xx x x xx x xxxxxxx xxxxx xxx
THIS PROGRAM REPI,ACES AtL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-I KNOWN AS HEC1 (JAN ?3), HECIGS, HECIDB, AND HECIK?T.
THE DEFINTTIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP. AND .RTIOR- HAVE CHANGED TROM THOSE USED WITH THE 1973-STYLE INPUT STRUCTURE.
THE DEFINITION OF -AJ',ISKK. ON RM-CARD WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE FORTRA}I?7 VERSTON
NEW OPTfONS: DAI"IBREAK OUTELOW SUBMERGENCE , SII'IGLE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION, DSS:9IRITE STAGE FREQUENCY,
DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN Al.lD Al.tPT INFILTRATION
KINEMATIC WAVE: NEW EINITE DIEFERENCE AIGORITHM
HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 1
LINE
I ID MAYFLY BEND RANCH
2 TD EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
3 ID lOO YEAR - 24 HOUR DESIGN STORM
4ID
*DIAGRAM
5 rr 5 4AUG01 1200 300
6IO5
'7
8I
10
11
KK 1A
BA .011
PH
LS 65
uD o.444
L2 KK 18
13 BA .O22
0.48 0.95 L.69 2.18 2.36 2.66 2.84 2.95
uD 0.354
KK COMBINE DRATNAGE AREA 1
HC2
KK 2A
BA . 063
LS 65
uD o.432
KK 2BBA .041
LSuD o.432
26 KK CO|'IBINE DRAINAGE AREA 22't HC 2
28 KK 3A
29 BA .OO2
30 LS 6531 uD 0.348
32 KK 38
33 BA .O28
34 LS 6535 uD 0.480
36 KK CO'BINE DRATNAGE AREA 337HC2
38 KK COMBINE DRAINAGE AREAS 2 AND 339HC2
HEC-1 TNPUT PAGE 2
LrNE ID.......1.......2. 3.-.....4-......5...,...6.......? .8.......9......10
40 KK 447 BA .02642 LSd3 uD 0.42644 zz
65
65
LSl4
15
16
18
19
20
2L
22
23
24
25
65
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF STREAM NETWORK
INPUT
LINE (V) ROUTTNG (--->) DIVERSION OR PUMP FLOI{
NO. (.) CONNECTOR (<---) RETURN OE DIVERTED OR PI,.IMPED FLOW
1A
to
28
ai
36
38
40
,:
. coMBrN,...
cot'tBIN.
(***) RUNOEF ALSO CO|.',PUTED AT THIS LOCATION
1**************t************************** *********r**************i******************
* FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-l} *
* SEPTEMBER 1990 *
* VERSION 4.0
* U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ** HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER ** 609 SECOND STREEI ** DAVIS, CALIEORNIA 95615 ** ( 916! 756-1104 ***
********t*************t********t*******
* RUN DATE 08/06/2001 TIME 13:36:L8 ***
******************************+**********
MAYFLY BEND RANCI{
EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
1OO YEAR - 24 HOUR DESIGN STORM
6 IO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROLIPLOT O PLOT CONTROL
OSCAL O. HYDROGMPH PLOT SCALE
L2
16
l8
22
COI4BIN.
t:
cot"tBIN.
IT HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA
NMIN 5 MTNUTES TN COMPUTATION INTERVA],rDATE 4AUG 1 STARTING DATE
ITIME LZOO STARTING TIME
NQ 3OO NLIMBER OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES. NDDATE SAUG 1 ENDING DATE
ND{IIME 1255 ENDING TIMEICENT 19 CENTURY MARK
COMPUTATION INTERVAL .08 HOURS
TOTAL TIME BASE 24.92 HOURS
ENGLISH UNITS
DRAINAGE AREA SQUARE MILES
PRECIPITATION DEPTH INCHES
IENGTH, ELEVATION FEET
FLOW CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
STORAGE VOLUME ACRE-FEET
SURPACE AREA ACRES
TEMPERATURE DEGREES TAHRENHEIT
RUNOFE SUMHARY
FLOW fN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
TIME IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES
PEAK TIME OF AVERAGE EIOW EOR MAXIMUM PERTOD BASTN MAKIMIJM TIME OFOPERATION STATION ELOW PEAK AREA STAGE MAX STAGE6-HOUR 24-HOUR ?2.HOUR
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COMBINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COI{BTNED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COT"IBINED AT
1A 2. 12.67
18 5. 12.s0
coMBrN '7 . 12.58
2A 13. L2.61
28 8. L2.67
col"fBIN 2L . 12 .67
3A 0. 12.50
38 5. L2.15
n
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
,
2
0. .01
0. .o2
0. .03
1. .06
1. .04
1. .10
0. .00
0. .03
0.
z.
1.
0.
1.0.
o
2 COMBINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
*** NORMAL END OE HEC-1 ***
+
+
coMBIN 6. L2.6-t 1. 0. o- .03
coMBIN 27. t2.67 7, 2. 2. .13
4 5. 72.6"7 1. 0. 0. .03
YJYO CI9OTOAOT.H ONY SNOIJYTNCTYC 4OYNIYVCI OfldOTgIgO
tr )flcNilddv
TABI]I,AR IIDROGRAPH METIIOD
O&V 25
Version 2.00
* rj ecE : TIAYFI-rY BEND RANCH:'ty : GARFIELD
Runoff (in)
Tc (hrs)
(Used)
(hr) Flow
11.0
11.3
11.5
11.9
L2.0
L2 .L
2
L2.4
L2.5
L2.6
L2.7
1,2.8
13 .0
t3.2
L3.4
r-3 .6
r-3 .8
14 .0
l_4 .3
L4.5
15.0
15 .5
16.0
16 .5
17 .0
L7 .5
18.0lo.0.\
26.4
6
5
4
2
2
2
z
2
l_
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
State: CO
User: JEK
Checked:
2.3
65*
DaEe:
Date:
u*,.rLiL1e : DEVELOPED HY]DROLOGIC COI.IDITIONS
ToEaI watershed area: 0.193 sq mi Rainfall Elpe: II
4
Area(sq mi) 0.01* 0.02* 0.05* 0.04* 0.00* 0.03* 0.03*
Frequency: 25 years
Subareas
2A 28 3A 3B1Bl_A
Rainfall (in) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
curve number 55* 56* 55* 56*
2.3
65*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.3
65*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TimeToOuElet. 0.00 0. 00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ia/ P o .47 0.45 0 .47 0.45 0 .47 0 .47 0 .47
Time ToE,aI - Subarea ConEribution to Tot,al Flow (cfs)
o .23 0 .2s o .23 0 .2s 0 .23 0 .23 0 .23
o .74* 0.55* 0 .79* 0 .79* 0 .64* 0 .97* 0 .79*
0 .75 0 -75 0 .75 0 .75 0 .75 0.75 0 .75
1A 18 2B 3A 3B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1P
L
L
1
L
L
l-
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1P
1
1
L
1
l-
1
OP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2P)
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
2
2
3P
3
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1P
1
1
l_
1
1-
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
1P
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
7
9P
9
8
7
6
L
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
L
1
t_
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
l_
1
l_
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
L
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P - Peak Flow * - value (s) provided from TR-55 syst,em rout,ines
RT]NOFF C'URVE NT'MBER COMPIITATION Version 2.00
ojecU, : I"IAYFLY BEND RANCH User: JEK Date:
Date:mty : GARFIELD St,at,e: CO Checked:
-.JOEit,IE : DEVELOPED ITYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
Subarea : LA
COVER DESCRIPTION
Hydrologic Soil GroupABCDAcres (C5{)
OTHER AGRICT LTT RAL LAI'IDS
Woods - grass combination fair
ToEal Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)7.3
SIIBAREA: 1A TOTAI DRAINAGE AREA: .7.3 ACTES WEfGETED CTJRI/E NT,MBER: 65
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPTITATION Version 2.00
- -cject : I|IAYFLY BEIID RANCH user: itEK. Dar.e:mEy : GARFIEI,D St,ate: CO Checked: _ Dat,e:oubEitle : DEVELOPED I{YDROLOGIC CONDfTfONS
Subarea : 18
COVER DESCRIPTION
Hydrologic Soil GroupABCD
Acres (CN)
FT LLY DEVELOPED ITRBAN AREAS (veg Estrab. )Impenzious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways - 0.52(99)
OTHER AGRICUIJTURATJ I.,AIVDS
Woods - grass combinat,ion fair - 13.6(65) -
Total Area (by UyOrologic Soil Group)L4.1
SITBAREA: 18 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: L4-t2 Acres WEIGHTED CURVE NTMBER: 66
RUNOFF CUR\IE NT]MBER COMPI'TATION Version 2.00
- -oj ecE
mty
oubEitle
Subarea
MAYFLY BEND RANCH
GARF]EIJD SIaLe: CO
DEVELOPED HMROI-,OGIC CONDITIONS
2A
User: iIEK
Checked:
Date:
DaEe:
COVER DESCRIPTION A
Hydrologic Soil GroupBCDAcres (CI{)
OTI{ER AGRICULTUR.LL I,ANDS
Woods - grass combinat,ion fair
Tot,a1 Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
- 40.1 (55)
40.1
SIIBAREA z 2A TOTAL DRAINAGE ARE.A,: 40.1 AcTes WEIGHTED CURVE NTMBER: 65
RI]NOFF CI'RVE NTIMBER COMPI'TATION Version 2.OO
- 'cj ect,
mty
or.r-btitle
Subarea
MAYFIJY BEND RANCH
GARFIELD State: CO
DEVELOPED HY:DROLOGTC CONDITTONS
28
User: JEK
Checked:
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION A
Hydrologic Soil GroupBCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED I'RBA}I
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots,
(veg EsE,ab. )
driveways - L.04 (98)
- 2s.s (5s)
26.s
AREAS
roofs,
OTTIER AGRICI]LTT]RAL I,ANDS
woods - grass combination fair
Tot,al Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
TOTAL DRAINAGE 26.54 Acres WETGHTED CUR\E NT'MBER: 66
^-oject :
rnEY :
_*.bt,it,Ie:
Subarea :
RI,NOFF CURVE NT,},IBER
MAYFLY BEND RANCHGARFIELD ST,at,e: Co
DEIruLOPED ITYDROLOGIC CO}ilDITIONS
3A
COMPI'TATION
User:
Checked:
Version 2.00
.JEK Dat,e:
Dat,e:
COVER DESCRIPTION A
Hydrologic Soil GroupBCD
Acres (CN)
OTHER AGRICULTTJRAL I,ANDS
Woods - grass combination fair 1.2 (5s)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)t.2
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: 1..2 AcTes WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER: 65
RI]NOFF CUR\/E NT'MBER COMPI]TATION Version 2.00
--oject : I'IAYFLY BEIID RANCH User: JEK Dat,e:nly : GARFIELD State: CO Checked: _ Dat,e:
--*rI,iT,Ie : DE\IEI,OPED ITTROLOGrC coNDITIoNS
Subarea : 3El
CO\IER DESCRTPTTON
Hydrologic Soil Group.A,BCD
Acres (eN)
OTHER AGRICIJLTT'RAI I,ANDS
Woods - grass combinat,ion fair
Tot,al Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
- 18 .1 (5s) -
18 .1
SIIBAREAi 38 TOTAL DRATNAGE AREA: 18.1 Acres pEIGIITED CURVE NITMBER: 65
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION Version 2.00
-'ojecE : IyIAYFLY BEND RANCH User: JEK Dat,e:rnty : GARFIETD SEate: CO Checked: _ Date:
or.rbEiEle : DEVELOPED IIY:DROLOGIC CONDITIONS
Su-barea : 4
COVER DESCRIPTION
Hydrologic Soil GroupABCD
Acres (Ct{)
OTIIER AGRICULTT'RAL I.ATIDS
Woods - grass combinat,ion fair
Tot,a1 Area (by llydrologic Soil Group)
- 16.4 (6s) -
1"6 .4
SIIBAREA: 4 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: ]-6.4 Acres WEIGHTED CT RVE NUMBER: 65
l*****t********************+**********i*****
* FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACIGGE (HEC-l} ** . SEPTEMBER 1990 ** VERSION 4.0 ***
* RUN DATE 08/06/200L TrME 14:23:06 **+
***************************+*************
.71t E.O ?.)
*********************r*******************
* U.S. ARMY CORPS OE ENGTNEERS ** HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER ** 609 SECOND STREET ** DAVTS, CALIEORNIA 95616 ** ( 916) 756-1104 ******************************************
xxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx xxxyJ xxxxxxxxx)ofix x xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxto{ xxxxx xxx
x
x
THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVTOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KNOWN AS HEC1 (JAN 73}, HECIGS, HECIDB, AND HECIKW.
THE DEFINTTIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP- AND -RTIOR- HAVE CHANGED EROM THOSE USED WITH THE 19?3-STYLE INPUT STRUCTURE.THE DEFTNITION OE -AMSKK- ON RM-CARD WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE FORTRANTT VERSTONNEW OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTELO,{ SUBMERGENCE , SINGTE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION, DSS:!{RITE STAGE FREQUENCY,DSS:READ TTME SERTES AT DESIRED CALCUI,ATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFIL?RATIoNKINEMATIC WAVE: NEW FINITE DTEFERENCE AIGORTTHM
PAGE 1
x
x
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
1I
9
10
11
t2
1:
ID MAYELY BEND RANCH
ID DEVELOPED HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONSID 25 YEAR - 24 HOUR DESIGN STORM
ID
*DIAGRAM
rT 5 4AUGO1ro5
KK 1ABA .011
PHLS 65uD o.444
1B
.o22
1200 300
KK
9t
0.41 0.17 1.32 1.70 1.84 2.O8 2.22 2 .30
15 uD 0.390
16 KK COMBTNE DRAINAGE AREA 117HC2
18 KK 2A19 BA .05320 LS 652L uD 0.47 4
22 KK 2823 BA .04124 LS 6625 uD o.41 4
26 KK COMBTNE DRAINAGE AREA 221HC2
28 KK 3A29 BA .OO230 LS 5531 uD 0.384
32 KK 3833 BA .02834 LS 6535 uD 0-522
36 KK CO}4BINE DMINAGE AREA 337HC2
38 KK COI"IBINE DRAINAGE AREAS 2 AND 339HC2
HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 2
LTNE
40 KK 441 BA .02642 LS43 uD 0.46844 ZZ
SCHEMATTC DIAGMM OF STREA}"I NETWORK
INPUT
LINE (V) ROUTING (--->' DIVERSION OR PUMP FLOW
NO. (. } CONNECTOR (<---) RETURN OF DTVERTED OR PT'MPED Ef,OW
1A
.r"
65
t2
15
18
28
32
36
COMBIN.
.24
COMBIN.
28
a:
. COMBIN....
COMBIN.
HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA
NMIN 5 MINUTES TN COMPUTATION INTERYALIDATE 4AUG 1 STARTING DATE
38
40
(***} RUNOFF AI,SO COMPUTED AT THIS LOCATTON1*******************************************
* TTOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-l} ** SEPTEMBER 1990 *
* VERSION 4,O **** RUN DATE 08/06/2001 TIME 14:23:05 ********************************************
MAYELY BEND RANCH
DEVELOPED HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
25 YEAR - 2{ HOUR DESIGN STORM
6 IO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONIROL
IPLOT O PLOT CONTROL
QSCAL O. HYDROGRAPH PLOtr SCALE
*****t**************r***************t****
* U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ** HYDROLOGIC ENGTNEERTNG CENTER ** 609 SECOND STREET ** DAVTS, CALIFORNIA 95616 ** (9!.6) 756-1104 ***
******************i**t********t********
IT
ITIME I2OO STARTING TIME
NQ 3OO NUMBER OE HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES
NDDATE SAUG 1 ENDING DATE
NDTIME 1255 ENDING TTME
rCENT 19 CENTURY MARK
COMPUTATION INTERVAL .08 HOURS
TOTAL TIME BASE 24.92 HOURS
ENGLISH UNITS
DRAINAGE AREA SQUARE MTLES
PRECTPITATION DEPTH INCHES
LENGTH, ELEVATION FEET
FLOW CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
STORAGE VOLUME ACRE-EEET
SUREACE AREA ACRES
TEMPERATURE DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
RUNOFE STJMMARY
FLOW IN CUBIC EEE? PER SECOND
TTME TN HOURS, AREA IN SOUARE MILES
PEAK TIME OE AVERAGE FLOfl FOR MTTXIMUM PERIOD BASIN MAXIMUM TIME OEoPERATfON STATIoN FI.OW PEAK AREA STAGE MAX STAGE6-HOUR 24-HOUR ?z-HOUR
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH A1
2 CO.,IBINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COMBINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COMBINED AT
2 COI"IBINED AT
1A 1. 12.75
18 2. 12.67
COMBIN 3. L2.61
2A 5. 12.83
28 4. L2.15
cor,fBIN 8. t2.75
3A 0. t2.67
3B 2. 12.83
co{BIN 2. 12.83
cot"tBrN 11. 12.83
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0-
0.
0.
1.
2.
0.
1.
1.
0. .01
0, .o2
0. .03
0. .06
0. .04
r.. .10
0. .00
0. .03
0. .03
1. .133.1.
HYDROGRAPH AT
*** NORM,qL END OE HEC-1 ***
4 2. 12.75 1. 0. o. . 03
--ojecE : r'IAYFLY BEIID RANCHrnty : GARFIELD
1A
Area(sq mi) 0.01*Rainfall (in) 3.0
Cunre number 65*
Runoff (in) 0.48Tc (hrs) 0.68*(Used) 0,75
TimeToOuE,let 0.00ra/p 0.37
TABI'I,AR II}'DROGRAPH METHOD
sEate: co
User: JEK
Cheeked:
283A3840.04* 0.00* 0.03* 0 - 03*3.0 3.0 3.0 3.066* 65* 65* 65*
o .s2 0 .48 0 .48 0.48
o .72* 0 .58* 0.90* 0 .71*0.7s 0 .50 0.75 0.750.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.35 0.37 0.37 0.37
Or1,/ t oo
Version 2.00
Date:
Date:
-dbt,itle : DEVELOPED }TYDROLOGIC COIIDITIONS
rotal warersheS_:::::_-!:i?l_::_Ti__ii:"5iil,:IB.:_11___-:::T:i:I:_i::_I:1'"
Time ToEal - subarea contribution to Totar Frow (cfs)(hr) Flow 1A 18 2A 28 3A 38 4
18 2A0.02* 0.06*3.0 3.066* 65*
0 .s2 0 .480.59* 0 .72*0.50 0 .7s0.00 0.000.3s 0.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
L
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
L
1
1
1-
0
11.0
11.3
1r-.6
11.9
L2.0
1,2.L
1) )
3
L2.4
t2.5
1,2 .6
1,2.7
1,2.8
13 .0
1,3.2
13 .4
13 .5
L3 .8
r_4 .0
14 .3
1,4 .6
r.5 .0
r-5 .5
r.6.0
15.5
17.0
1_7.5
18.0
19.0
0
0
26.O
0
0
0
0
0
0
2I
r-5
22
26
29P
27
2L
t-5
13
l_0
9
7
5
6
6
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
3
4P
3
3
2
2
L
l_
1
l-
1
l_
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
2
3
4P
4
4
3
2
2
2
1_
1
1
l_
1
1
1
OP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
3
5
5
7P
6
5
4
3
2
2
2
l-
1
1
1
1
1
1-
L
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
4
6
8
9PI
7
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
4P
4
4
3
3
2
1_
1_
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
L
1
2P)
1,
1
L
1
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P - Peak Flow * - value (s) provided from TR-55 syst,em routines
TTME OF CONCE}flTRATION AIiID fRAVEL TIME
"ojecE : IvIAYFLY BEIID RANCHrnty : GARFIELD State: CO
-*otitle : DE\ELOPED ITYDROLOGIC COIIDITTONS
Subarea #1Flow fype 2 year Length Slope Surfacerain (f tr) (f r/f r,) code
User:
Checked:
---;;;;- - ;; --;;i;;;;;--;i;;
(sqlfr,) (fr) (fElsec) (hr)
Version 2.00
Date:
Dat.e:
1_A
n
SheeE 2.95 r-00 .01 H.01 uShallow Concent'd 500
Open Channel 900
;i;;-,yp;- - -; -;;;;- - -;;;il- - -;r:s"'3i,t3";
rain (fE) (fE/fE) code
0.492
0.0852.5 0.100
Time of Concentrat.ion = 0.68*
=====
1Bn Area Wp Velocity Time(sq/fu) (fL) (frlsec) (hr)
Sheet 2.95
Shallow Concenttd
Open Channel
100
500
800
.0r-5
.01-
H
U
0 .418
0.086
0.089
= 0.59t
2.5
Time of ConcenE,ration
.;-.*;- --; -;;;;- --;;;;;;- - -;':S"'3i'13.;
rain (fL) (fL/ft ) code
---;;;;- ;; --;;i;;i;;--;il;
(sq/f u) (f tr) (tr,/sec) (hr)
2A
n
Sheet 2.95 100
Shallow Concent'd 500
Open Channel 13 00
.01_ H.01 u
o.492
0.085
2 .5 0. r.44
Time of ConcentraLion = 0.72*
=====
n Area vlp Velocity Time(sq/fr,) (fL) (frlsec1 (hr)
;i;;-*rr;'- -;-;;;;- - -;;;il- - -;,#:"8i.f3". 28
rain (f r ) (ft/ ft ) code
Sheet 2.95 L00
Shallow Concent'd 500
Open Channel 13 00
* - GeneraE,ed for use
.01" H.0r- u
0.492
0.0862.5 0.t44
Time of Concentration = 0.72*
=====
by TABIILAR method
JEK
TIME OF CONCENTRATION A}ID TRAVEL TTME
^-ojecE : I"IAYFLY BEIID RANCHmty : GARFIELD St,ate: CO
-.bEiI,IE : DEVELOPED ITYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
Subarea #5Flow T:4>e 2 year Length Slope Surfacerain (f E) (ftr/fE) code
User:
Checked:
.TEK
3A-n Area Wp Velociey Time(sq/f r) (f r) (f r/sec) (hr)
Version 2.00
Date:
Date:
Sheet 2.95
Shallow Concent'd
;i;;-*,e ;-' - ;-;;;- - -;;;il- - - ;,:H"=Ei,l5";rain (f E) (f r,/f r) code
0.492
0 .086Time of ConcenLrat,ion = 0.58*
=====
38 ----n Area Wp VelociEy Time(sq/fr) (fr) (frlsec) (hr)
H
U
100
500
.01
.01
Sheet,2.95
Shallow ConcenE'd
Open Channel
;,,rc;---;-;;;;---i;il;---;idy"5il,33"- n
rain ( ftr) (ftr/ ft-) code
0 .492
0.0862.5 0.222Time of Concent,ration = O.8O*
=====
n Area Wp Velocity Time(sq/ft,) (ftr) (frlsec) (hr)
100
s00
2 000
.01 H.0r. u
SheeE 2.95
Shallow Concenttd
Open Channel
100
500
]-200
.01
.01
H
U
0.492
0 .085
2 .5 0 .133
Time of Coneentration = 0.71*
=====
Sheet Flow Surfaee CodesA Smoot.h Surface F Grass,B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass,
C Cult,ivated < 20 ? Res. H Woods,D Cultivated > 20 ? Res. I Vfoods,
E Grass-Range, Short, J Range,
* - Generated for use by TABULAR met,hod
ShaIlow Concent.rat,ed
Surface Codes
P Paved
U Unpaved
Dense
Burmuda
Light
Dense
Natural
1*******************************************
* FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACTGGE (HEC-I) *
* SEPTEMBER 1990 *
* VERSION 4.0 *
*r** RUN DATE 08/06/2007 TIME 14:32:l-l- ***
******************************+**********
arr-'- i- .
************r***t**********************
*a
* U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ** HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER ** 609 SECOND STREET ** DAVIS. CALTFORNIA 95616 ** (916) 755-11,04 *
*1
*********************************t*****
x
x
x
xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxx
xxxxxxx
THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PRE\IOUS VERSTONS OF HEC.1 KI.IOfiIN AS HEC1 (JAN ?3}, HECIGS, HECIDB, AND HECIKW.
THE DEFINITTONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP- AND -RTIOR- HAVE CHANGED FROM THOSE USED WITH THE ].973-STYLE INPUT STRUCTURE.THE DEFINITION OF -AMSKK- ON RM-CARD WAS CHANGED WITH REVISTONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS ]S THE FORTRANT? VERSTON
NEW OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTFLOW SUBMERGENCE , SINGLE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION, DSS:WRITE STAGE FREQUENCY,
DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS PATE:GREEN AND AMPT INEILTRATIoN
KINEMATIC WAVE: NEr'I FINITE DIEEERENCE ALGORI?TM
HEC-1 fNPUT PAGE 1
x
xx
I,INE
1
2
3
4
5
6
fD
ID
TD
ID
*DIAGRAM
IT
IO
MAYTLY BEND RANCH
EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS
1OO YEAR - 24 HOUR DESTGN STORM
4AUG01 1200 300
E
7
I
9
10
11
KK
BA
PH
LS
UD
1A
.011
o.444
LB
. o22
t2
13
KK
BA
65
0.48 0- 95 1.59 2.L8 2 .36 2 .66 2.84 2.95
14 LS 6615 UD 0.354
16 KK COMBINE DRAINAGE AREA 1L1HC2
18 KK 2A19 BA .06320 LS 6521 UD 0.432
22 KK 2B23 BA - 04124 LS 6625 uD 0.432
26 KK COMBINE DRAINAGE AREA 221HC2
28 KK 3A29 BA -OO230 LS 6531 UD 0.348
32 KK 3833 BA .O2A34 LS 6535 uD 0. {80
36 KK COMBINE DRATNAGE AREA 337HC2
38 KK COMBINE DMTNAGE AREAS 2 AND 339HC2
HEC-I INPUT PAGE 2
LINE rD.......1.. -....2.......3, 4.......5.......6.......7 .8......-9...--.10
40 KK 44l BA .02642 LS43 UD 0.42644 ZZ
65
SCHEMATIC DTAGRAM OF STREAM NETWORK
rNPUT
LINE (V} ROUTING (--->} DIVERSION OR PUMP FLO$T
NO. (-} CONNECTOR (<---) RETURN OE DIVERTED OR PI.,,UPED FLOH
1A
l2
t6
1B
22
lo
ZO
32
36
40
COMBIN.
t:
2A
COMBIN.
,?
.3A
.4
.38
cor,lBIN.
COMBIN.
(***) RUNOFF ALSO COMPUTED AT THIS LOCATION
1*******************************************
* ELOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-l) *
* SEPTEMBER 1990 *
* VERSTON 4.0 **** RUN DATE 08/06/2OOL TIME Lrl:32:11 *
*i
****t*t**********************************
I PRNT
I PLOT
OSCAI,
****************+***+********************
* U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ** HYDROLOGIC ENGTNEERING CENTER ** 609 SECOND STREET ** DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 ** (9161 756-1104 ***
**r********t****************t**********
MAYFLY BEND RANCH
EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDTTIONS
1OO YEAR - 24 HOUR DESIGN STORM
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
5 PRINT CONTROL
O PLOT CONTROL
O. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
6ro
IT HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA
NMIN 5 MINUTES IN COMPUTATION INTERVAL
IDATE AAUG ]. STARTING DATE
IT]ME 12OO STARTING TIME
NO 3OO NUMBER OF HYDROGMPH ORDINATESNDDATE SAUG 1 ENDING DATE
NDTIME 7255 ENDING TIME
ICENT 19 CENTURY MARK
COMPUTATION INTERVAL .08 HOURS
TOTAL TIME BASE 24.92 HOURS
ENGLISH UNITS
DRAINAGE AREA SQUARE MILES
PRECTPITATION DEPTH INCHES
LENGTH, ELEVATION PEET
ELOW CUBTC EEET PER SECOND
STORAGE VOLUME ACRE-EEET
SURFACE AREA ACRES
TEMPERATURE DEGREES EAHRENHEIT
RUNOFF SUMMARY
ELOW IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
TIME IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES
PEAK fIME OF AVERAGE FLOW FOR MAXTMUM PERIOD BASTN MAX]MUM T]ME OFOPERATION STATION FLOW PEAK AREA STAGE MAX STAGE6-HOUR 24-HOUR ?2-HOUR
HYDROGRAPH AT 1A 2. 12.6't
18 5. 12 .50
coMBIN 7. 12.58
2A 13. L2.6't
2B 9. 12.67
coI4BIN 22. 12.67
3A O. 12.50
38 5. L2.75
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COMBTNED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COMBINED AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
HYDROGRAPH AT
2 COI{BTNED AT
0. . 01
0. .o2
0. .03
1. .06
1. .04
1. .10
0. ..00
0. .03
0.
0.
0.
L.
3.
,
0.
1.
1,.
I
1.
0.
1.0.
2 COMBINED AT
. HYDROGRAPH AT
*** NORM]qL END OE HEC-1 *t*
COI.{BrN 6. 72.6't 1 . 0. O. . 03
CoMBIN 21 . 12.67 7 . 2. Z. .13
4 5. 12.67 1. 0. o. .03
APPENDD( M
RAINFALL INTENSITY _ DI]RATION _ FREQUENCY CURTES
***** HYDRO *****(version 5.0) *****
IDE CURVE
IDF Curve for Various Return periods
Date 08-01-**
Page No 2
Duration 25 tr
Intensities (inlh)
2Yx 5Yr 10Yr 50 Yr 100 Yr
5 nin
10 min
15 min
30 min
60 min
120 min4h8h
16h24h
4.944
3. 856
3.099
2.t]-0
1.320
.852
.497
.2"72
.L42
.096
3. 166
2.328
1.146
1. 104
.654
.422
.246
.135
.071
.048
3. 904
2.950
2.287
1- .491
.910
.587
.343
.187
.098
.066
4.357
3.340
2.634
1,.756
1.082
. 698
.408
aaa
.117
.0'7 9
5.371
4.236
3 .44"1
2.379
1.504
.97 0
.56'1
.309
.162
.110
5.'1'17
4 .602
3.786
2.544
1.687
1.088
.636
.347
.782
.L23
NEAR CARBONDAIE COLORADOIntensity Curve for 25 year Return period
Rainfall fntensity (inlh) versus Duratj.on (h)
4 .94*
3. 71*
2.41 .
1.24 .
.00.
.00
24.00
6.00 l-2. 00 18.00
***** HYDRO ***** (VersiOn 5.0) ***** Date 08-01-**
Page No 3
IDT CURVE
=: File Created on Intermediate Directory: CARBONDA.IDF
*** END OE RtN
*************** HYDRO _ Vgrsion 6.0 **************** HEC19 / Design Event vs Return period program *
Date of Run: 08-01-**
Page No 1
IDT CURYE
--- Input FiIe: C: \HYDRO\CARBONDA.HDO
IDF NEAR CARBONDAIE COTORADO
::: IDEI CURVE Option Selected ...
LOC 39 24 L07 LL
--- The Latitude is 39 degrees, 24--- The Longitude is 107 degrees,
RPD 25
--- The Selected Return Period is
*** End of Command File
minutes.
11 mi-nutes.
25 years.