The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 CCI ZA.0 t}M SOD Job Address (2Lc7 Nature of Work Building Perntiit Use of Building S JF- ui- Q VA O'Wner Laie e_Q(ap Contractor &-ivt1.12.6 Amount o ' i IS (-01,2 2 Date 1��. c;S • 4 No. 7803 L1l)t l tr Aoce CALte..LA D� t fi e 111111 Clerk t1-6'. 00 065 Las /fit449o5 DR r 07- f -Ac EL4'vC _CS, 174323. tro 3344. up x,494/. ACA zs 44(;? oat: slam '-(r 66e r C . -sal4i5k cJf i/ 013 :it _ fa GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 9454212 PERMIT NO. g d INSPECTION LINE: (970) 3 8 4-5003 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. 10B ADDRESS: Elk 5 S' S' 0 I I 66015 4�S+ ! 503 .D1�1�(�4 1 LOT NO. [ 2 BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISION : i' I. 1 N ,5 0 .R - i (a o r D4i-w1r1.• Mrs Flwaz, e ADDRESS r" W""` 3 MK Mlinef rie ADDRESS b05. 74f=4 c pi a. .N„......,7142, LC NO: 4 715.± b$1/ -f_e)ADDRESS ti ROG.r.9 los G" i tv,c 42 -~8,p ! -" S � i r `FINi54.4)(pjdunFIO IQ.rr.aewr b5 fie `, 1 WO. row 6 _ f MOCIF aoemiO 1 t.1 • A .A _ 111 ..,c.. L • ' -4-w•e.�r I EeK1l6110.R R -Pc A wevtis -- cru spe-tc e 4- s��b QA 8 . cum OF WORM o�w� DADDMoN OALTEPATMN DRUM DREMOVtt 9 DAMAGE oeeaaE CARPORT: OWN=• opOUBl2' 10 ODRIVEWAY PEPS= INPA DONWEitM.ADOMrw Ss.,1 �V ,AWAI4 QC5a, 12W VALUATION GFWORM i 000' .0.;) 300 INEOGAL 0243.110NIR /.,C/ blt[ o7- 76,-,-,:, 24' 0015/1,4i1)FD/ ive- 13P eb-rZ 4- .100,-i ` 4/lJ,Ce-7p NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT I8 REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WTIIBN Ito DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WHICH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR TILE PERFORMANCE OF FLAN CHECK FEE: 1 Oi 3 R 6 PERMIT FEE: 41/ l b s 2.2 C TOTAL PSE:4 r DATE PERMIT ISSUED: �7 a b .2 . f OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE: ' r ' ` ` f n..---5 V �J ZONING: SETBACKS: CONSTR. N. v- 6.0) Sipetere or1 , Coehector spat ,ase above. ��,� HOME: .,.. r .i fiNllf .. . A n BeiWir<D� ATr PERMISSION IS HEREBY Ci1ANIED TO TIE APPLICANT Al OWNED CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE maxi' OF THE CONTRACTORT�STRUCI TIS S UCW DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUIUMNGDEPARTMENT. {)3i}�� /Fr IN CONSIDERATION OF TIM ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH AIL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUITIORIIY GIVEN DI 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER ACE1EES THAT IF TTE ABOVE SAID ORDDIANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OP THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND MERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. TIM ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT TIRE BUITDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING TIM CORRECTION OF ERRORS 114 SAB) PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR PRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TIES JURISDICTION. T1I8 REVIEW OF THE SUBM IT ED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOr CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY BESPON81B1LII'IES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCITON RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER. BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THRs OWNERS D4TEREST. /,� Guforoloo3 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE A( EEM ENT ABOVE. flNT IAL) `' ! olka br-- 9af° Z33 ,Ll6 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i,e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. * * * *CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # "7$0_3 bpcont /07700 Date �, r Mr. Arno Ehlers Chief Building Inspector Garfield County Building Dept 109 Eight Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 October 17, 2000 Ciw& Arno, Attached you will find a copy of the Soils Report for the McElwee Residence as discussed by phone. You should also find a copy of the survey attached to each set of drawings. I have completed the structural design in house. The soil bearing capacity of 2000 lbs. per square foot was complied with and the roof and all floors were designed to support 40 lbs. per square foot live load. Sorry I failed to stamp the drawings. However, at the time of delivery of this letter I will add my stamp to the drawings. If you have any other questions, please give my a call. Sincerely, Afta6C)4•4•41,-- E R N EBT C D E LTO ARCHITECT 1 5 9 9 R O A D 1 0 9 GL E N W O O❑ SPRINGS. COLORADO 9 1 6 0 1INGS. 9 4 5- 5 9 2 1 Gtech May 31, 2000 Gary McElvee P.O. Box 532 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5021) County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970.945-7988 Fax: 970.945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 100 403 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed McElvee Residence, Lot 32, Filing 5, Los Amigos Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. McElvee: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated May 9, 2000. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be two story wood frame construction with an attached garage. Ground floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively Light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: Lot 32 is located on the south side of Los Amigos Drive. The lot is vegetated with a pinyon and juniper tree forest with a ground cover of grass and weeds. Numerous basalt cobbles and boulders are exposed on the ground surface and a possible sheet flow of basalt rock was observed at the southern part of the building area. The ground surface is gently sloping down the south. Elevation difference across the building site is about 1 to 2 feet. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 11/2 feet of topsoil, consist of basalt cobbles and boulders in a silty sand matrix. Silty sand was observed in Pit 1 at 1 foot through 3 feet. Results of swell -consolidation testing Gary McElvee May 31, 2000 Page 2 performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the silty sand, presented on Fig. 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a low collapse potential when wetted. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. The soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Voids created from boulder removal should be filled with compacted structural fill or concrete. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. H -P GEOTECH Gary McElvee May 31, 2000 Page 3 Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design H -P GEOTECH Gary McElvee May 31, 2000 Page 4 changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis Eller Reviewed by: 700 REG/ tiulli�illtlllilyr Ali p11443 V.G /I 4)k SiONAL � 4 Daniel E. LEE/rso attachments H -P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 50' 1 1 LOS AMIGOS DRIVE UTILITY EASEMENT r PIT 1 ■ L LOT 32 LOT BOUNDARIES LOT 26 BUILDING ENVELOPE 1 1 1 ■ 1 PIT 2 J 1 1 LOT 31 100 403 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 1 Depth — Feet 0 5 ....... 10 LEGEND: PIT 1 WC*.18.7 00-81 WC -17.4 -200-22 LL -54 PI -9 ElTOPSOIL; sandy silt, organic. firm, moist, black. •10 Ar�* �r�rAr ISI PIT 2 WC=15.6 0D-78 SAND (SM); silty, gravelly, loose to medium dense, moist, light brown, calcareous. 0 10 BASALT COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM); in a silty sand matrix. dense, moist, light brown to white, calcareous. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on May 11, 2000 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) LL — Liquid Limit ( % ) DO = Dry Density ( pcf ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Depth — Feet 100 403 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 6\ Compression 6\ c O ToN w L d E O u 0 1 2 3 T Moisture Content = 18.7 percent Dry Density = 81 pcf Sample of: Silty Sand From: Pit 1 at 1 Foot N\ "" Compression upon wetting 0.1 0 1 2 3 4 5 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf 100 Moisture Content = 15.6 percent Dry Density = 78 pcf Sample of: Silty Sand Matrix From: Pit 2 at 4 Feet ______,_ Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 100 403 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. .3 M t• c) d z co 0 It p w g C CO N > +-, V) C CO Cr) T +-• cn x co E C N U} >. V) GRADATION GRAVEL SAND 1%1 {%} r Ara illitte "• N =1.1 . a l l elf a el A. Resolution on The Los Amigos PUD zone district text and PUD P i 96-34. As a condition of approval for the amaxbrients, don was required to dedicate at least the equivalent of 25% of each s ..,.ti Amigos homeowners association. Filings 5A-11 is a total of 1772�7.145nac. theo n � with 970.708 ac. (56%) of Open Space. B. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: The 1995 Garfield County Comprehensive Plan identifies the Los Amigos PUD as an existing subdivision. and the PUD was found to be in general conformity with the Comprehensive Plan when it was amended in 1996. C. Soils/Topography: The applicant's geologic report for this development "did not identify anyorportion of the that would prevent development of thesitefor the ins conditions singpotenle resgeologic idential 8l family residential use. We recommend we perform detailed soils and foundation investigations on a site specific basis to determine subsurface conditions, and provide foundation recommendations." Consistent with this recommendation, the Board of County Commissioners required that the following plat note be placed on all subsequent plats, as a part of the PUD amendment approved: "Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner of eac ' shall pTepare and S. 1111 ►e 11111 C, it, to Gaily g tural D. Road/Access: The proposed subdivision is accessed by Los Amigos Drive, which D ' hi h n is being built to minor collector standards and will handle up to 250 single family dwellings. The applicants have proposed to build Los Amigos Drive as a minor collector with a 60 ft. row and 12 ft. driving lanes, up to Station 143+15.38. The rest of Los Amigos Drive will be built to Secondary Access standard with a 60 ft. ROW, with 11 ft. driving lanes. All other roads will be built to Rural Access standards with a 50 ft. ROW and 11 ft. wide driving lanes. All of the roads will have 'a chip and seal surface. At the end of the loop is an access easement identified as Driveway G, but there are no proposed standards for this road. There will be a minimum of two (2) lots using the driveway and possibly four (4) lots. if the lots having frontages on both Los Amigos Drive and Driveway 0, access off of Driveway G, GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 4 January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.Q.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property," s, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ✓ 4. Dothe plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and jJclearances required between wood and earth? Yes 2 1 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's and soffits? Yes 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes i/ 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes [7- 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes t- 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of all columns apd beams? Yes d/ 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing gra4e contours? Yes �V 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and m,pdel and Colorado Phase 11 certifications or phase n EPA certification? Yes ✓ No 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with tie Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements ofthe Uniform Building Code? v Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ✓ No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes V No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenant!? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural mmittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 20. Will this belie only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 21. Have twj(2) ' complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 22. Do you and and that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 2011.? Yes No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction cede requirements? Yes ;/ No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes i/ No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicatio of these changes? Yes No 4 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes iJ No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay youf inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes v No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy d occupancy of the building? Yes V No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project plying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance ofa building permit you are required to show proofofa driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 31. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applica a inspection. Yes No 32. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building permit?. Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes V No 5 I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. le -47 -Gu signature date Phone: ` ' Y) ( ( (days); (evenings) Project Name: Project Address: Notes: C I(cvPr d L., 04- 31_ 6((Cfer; ivy J5 /Pt -15Us) If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 8/00 ;r -e ar ty\e„-+ /4-1 ,if �S-�c41vY, flcei Sig nv � � rip4asl 1()..1-16) . vd e -v r 1-1L �,, � �ej- +cam W� e. 1 [t S t S S w N'► . tlP v/ .S Q U e v LLC 9. 3 -6 6 z 1 w 2. rg, Fe C ahap 0- v' E a . 4aw O 00 Ca c . o ao = 11 t o 0 4.1 CO 3 .4 u cr ,.: County Road (Note the Road Number and Name) 1994 Building rade Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the }ides Snowload: 40Ibs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. /sq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches --30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowload-imposed by snow) 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING and PLANNING NOTICE OF CLARIFICATION FIRE PROTECTION: It is the interpretation of this department that the provision of UBC Section 302.4, Exception Number 3, also applies to openings for access to attic space above a U occupancy. The access door in the ceiling of a garage must be self closing, tight fitting, solid wood door, 1-318ths inches thick, or have a 20 minute fire protection rating or the one hour fire separation wall between the garage and the dwelling must extend above the ceiling, all the way to the roof. ENERGY CONSERVATION Garfield County is enforcing Resolution 96-05 (Chap. 13 Energy Conservation). ➢ 2" x 4" Exterior walls must be supplemented (i.e. Rigid insulation with taped or sealed joints or other approved ways to comply with minimum county insulation requirements: R-19 — Walls; R-29 -- Roofs; 1* R-11 — Floors over unheated areas 1* Exception: Insulate foundation to frost line and install vapor barrier on ground surface. CU00/ Hepworth•Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Gtech Phone: 970-945-7988 eCounty Ro154ad d Glenwood Springs, s, Colorado 81601 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com May 31, 2000 Gary McElvee P.O. Box 532 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Job No. 100 403 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed McElvee Residence, Lot 32, Filing 5, Los Amigos Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. McElvee: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated May 9, 2000. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be two story wood frame construction with an attached garage. Ground floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: Lot 32 is located on the south side of Los Amigos Drive. The lot is vegetated with a pinyon and juniper tree forest with a ground cover of grass and weeds. Numerous basalt cobbles and boulders are exposed on the ground surface and a possible sheet flow of basalt rock was observed at the southern part of the building area. The ground surface is gently sloping down the south. Elevation difference across the building site is about 1 to 2 feet. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 11/2 feet of topsoil, consist of basalt cobbles and boulders in a silty sand matrix. Silty sand was observed in Pit 1 at 1 foot through 3 feet. Results of swell -consolidation testing Gary McElvee May 31, 2000 Page 2 performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the silty sand, presented on Fig. 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a low collapse potential when wetted. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. The soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Voids created from boulder removal should be filled with compacted structural fill or concrete. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. FIoor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. fi-� GEOTECH Gary McElvee May 31, 2000 Page 3 Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design H -P GEOTECH Gary McElvee May 31, 2000 Page 4 changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. --- Louis Eller Reviewed by: "100 REG/ /if,.. .... le" it. Daniel E. LEE/rso attachments rdi , P 443 ; k G. / /0 �� L H -P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 50' I 1 LOS AMIGOS DRIVE UTILITY EASEMENT BUILDING, ENVELOPE 1 PIT 1 1 ■ 1 1 1 ■ I PIT2 I L LOT 32 LOT BOUNDARIES LOT 26 J 1 I LOT 31 100 403 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 1 0 5 10 LEGEND: WC -18.7 00-81 wc.•f7.4 - 200-22 LL -54 P1-9 0 TOPSOIL; sandy silt, organic, firm, moist, black. PIT 2 SAND (SM); silty, gravelly, loose to medium dense, moist, light brown, calcareous. 0 5 10 BASALT COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM); in a silty sand matrix, dense, moist, light brown to white, calcareous. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on May 11, 2000 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and Togs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The Tines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (% ) LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Depth — Feet 100 403 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 Compression c 0 N E n 0 0 1 2 3 Moisture Content = 18.7 percent Dry Density = 81 pcf Sample of: Silty Sand From: Pit 1 at 1 Foot Compression upon wetting 0.1 0 1 2 3 4 5 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content 15,6 percent Dry Density = 78 pcf Sample of: Silty Sand Matrix From: Pit 2 at 4 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 100 403 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. SWELL --CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 i te 0 . 1 Silty sand Silty sand Silty sand matrix _ t x � V ATTERBERG UMTS UOUIO PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX MI IV . Its ' N t 2 i a 0 -_ w 0 x II SAMPLE LOCATION I E �- M N 1 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MAGE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT ARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.l. 3/ ned Area Permit No......t.,. o sl AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector anq IMMEDIATELY BE , • ME NULL AND VO D. Usg. Add so Owneri % Contractor This Card Must Be Posted So it is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Foundation Underground Plumbing Insulation Rough Plumbing •; z.. - e i Drywall , Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by State Inspector)G{R�a Gas Piping -� , c c.. _�, c Final (r-,S-d,el. Electric Rough (By State Inspector) 4, ',PIG w ' Septic Final 1 Framing :3 -2. r ' „ : (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). ' Notes: 1 illmilimemineorimmeimimeniimi ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND O1 ABOVE GROUND. r1.. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE" Phoneme 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood firprings, Colorado. APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CAR '. Date Byikat201) SJ IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC