Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application- Permit
K Job Address 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 Na. 7786 aR ao LI 1 0 Nature of Work Building Permit Use of Building; owner Kit L- ]! R� y ii Contractor Jj� �t:."_i� Amount of Permit$ Date IC)/ j Joc us,--v.LLip )(-) 50, cao 5o 99S. F7 /050D c t.zoY .e&eue C . r. `-t I -pDrTito4..S MrfC t3D5 GfG 6 9.ao = .-syY.00 R 0.06 = 97 fo(0).oc qKs sogR . Th.) `}45,89 �� .� INF GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (OLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 9454212 �tQ PERMIT NO. —1-7 � �P INSPECTION LINE: (970)384-5003 PARCEUSCHEDULE NO. ti o? IQJ 14p • JOB ADDRESS: t070 0 Cq amu, DE:R(G- 6051(q3o 1 LOT NO. BLOCIC NO. SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION ' I �" Ir , 2a , °""'�j y L. ley/E ADDREmpo CQ_i,- ,T f= 81L,30 4;0-260-/h 970-483-98is: 3 CONTRACTOR sei r ADDRESS m: LIC. NO. 4• "�! A)K £h7 /A/C. AooR..f gal' QLI leo, 6 37' C,c'/v, ,P/Sa 0:M 0$72, tea..3Aa 5 In. PT. OF/=zero 00 .Q. PT. OF LOT ACLS 15 moor / `2 ' NO. OF CLUE- .. 6 taxa aP.uRm+a tikr',r 9a 04 (oi le mµ-- 7 TThrVLLL / . MKS= COS: 1L MI 8 aARf ca Tam >tirw oADonfOH MALTOATION W 1.nRmmY. 9 ,u ( _ viitielk hitt., CARPORT: o 10 XOltIVE*AY PIP UT it"e:pe�, /nom r ' AtIor ono ark•ACIE DISPOSAL comic) UN4 # S I . Sid OF WILLA LA Anil ADAM= VAWAII.tt Q{ Vqj (O(J VVV (� orocia.commda: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. TIQS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID W WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT OOMMENCED WIDEN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS OOVERNTINO TINS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HERRIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTIO . FLAN CHECK FEE: �� PERM F FEE / . 7 c =(5 S. '9 ToTAL FEE; DATE PERMIT ISSUED: r q ( 9 "i J • 0 J + 5) • (s - e OCC: (RtOUP:CONST: TYPE: — ZONING: SETBACKS: BIsadore of , C oair or��a%%nthorimd sent _ ..od . - ... , , .. _ .. r ' ! . : MANU. HOME: Is1]S A FSE: 0 AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY CIRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWN , NTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SI(B4ER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILD/NO CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE PROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN ANDTHERE TT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRD O THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID FLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF TIES CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF MS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RiEBPONSIB1LTTIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. 1 G tfomoo3 I HEREBY ACICNOWLED (INITIAL)THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE ITIAL) •L IL i4q7-Sy The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; S. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # `7 Ei(p . /�� / 9-A9 00 /' SignatGre Date bpcont No. 1�4 Assessor's Parcel No Ir /� BUI DI Q PERMIT CARD Job Addr ss 11 `4 L)bl aO & [Au Owner <YLL Te.Q.Ry Contractor C)LOI3ER Setbacks: Front III M w t1 -i criaps Soils Test Footing Foundation 4i Grout Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing Framing Insulation Roofing Drywall Gas Piping )0-17-ej Address�k 0?) FF el.L Phone ifrcrk)4>W0C512S Address Phone # Rear i1c; Wp � 419/C/ 01— ro/n /01 c d 7/pyo 1 RH LH Zonyig INSPECTIONS f 0 1:) `/ !' 6 / Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final (State) Final /Checklist Completed? Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # -3y Other ?PAM/ Re4e/eaaa, /AA ///16/1 ,‘ c ( ontinue on back) Date Final ori ID 1 Gra ion/ 10 13 • c),K l,ry Sad g� // O GARFIELD APPLICATION F C R 1 1 1 District: II 1 1 Road: 211 1 1 Permit #: 252-00 D 1 1 1 C OUNTY DRIVEWAY PERMIT actsu Application Date 08--10-419 I, TERRY KYLE (herein called "Applicant"), hereby requests permission and authority from the Board of County Commissioners to construct driveway approach(es) on the right-of-way of Garfield County Road Number 211 adjacent to Applicant's property located on the side of the road, a distance of 1.2 mile(s) from CR 211 AND PROPERTY LINE for the purpose of obtaining access to PRIVATE RESIDENCE Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a sketch of the proposed instal- lation showing all necessary specification detail including (1) front- age of lot along road, (2) distance from centerline of road to property line (3) number of driveways requested, (4) width of pro- posed driveway(s) and angle of approach, (5) distance from driveway to road intersection, if any, (6) size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach, and (7) setback distance of building(s) and other structures or improvements, GENERAL PROVISIONS a l FIRST: The Applicant represents all parties in interest, and affirms that the driveway approach(es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing business or servicing vehicles on the road right-of-way. SECOND: The Applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction of the driveway(s) and its appurtenances on the right-of-way. All work shall be completed within 30 days of the Permit date. THIRD: The type of construction shall he as designated and/or approved by the Board of County Commissioners or their representative, and all materials used shall be of satisfactory quality and subject to inspec- tion and approval of the Board of County Commissioners or their representative. FOURTH: The traveling public shall be protected during the instal- lation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board of County Commissioners and their duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the Permit. FIFTH: The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or clearance of snow, ice or sleet upon any portion of the driveway ap- proach(es) even though deposited on the driveway(s) in the course of the County snow removal operations, SIXTH: In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be securely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remain- ing fence, and all posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners, SEVENTH: No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without the written permis- sion of the Board of County Commissioners. EIGHTH: Provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and incorporated herein as conditions hereof. SPECIAL CONDITIONS NO CULVERT REQUIRED,GRAVEL BACK A MIN OF 50",RESPONSIBLE FOR 2 YEARS AFTER COMPLETION,CONTACT KRAIG KUBERRY FOR FINAL INSPECTION In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach(es) described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions and agrees to construct the drive- way(s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Witness: Signed: �/ A (Si nature of Applicant) (Address) (Telephone Number) PERMIT GRANTED THIS DAY OF Avco upsrr O , SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CONDITIONS IPULATED HEREIN. For Board of County i, -loners of Garfield County, Colorado BY1 SPECIFICATIONS 1. A driveway approach is understood to be that portion of the high -- way right-of-way between the pavement edge and the property line which is designed and used for the interchange of traffic between the road- way pavement and the abetting property. 2. At any intersection, a driveway shall be restricted for a suf- ficient distance from the intersection to preserve the norma] and safe movement of traffic. (It is recommended for rural residence entrances that a minimum intersection clearance of 50 feet be provided and for rural commercial entrances a minimum of 100 feet be provided.) 3. All entrances and exits shall be so located and constructed that vehicles approaching or using them will be able to obtain adequate sight distance in both directions along the highway in order to maneuver safely and without interfering with highway traffic. 4, The Applicant shall not be permitted to erect any sign or display material, either fixed or movable, on or extending over any portion of the highway right -of --way. 5, Generally, no more than one approach shall be allowed any parcel or property the frontage of which is less than one hundred (100) feet, Additional entrances or exits for parcels or property having a frontage in excess of one hundred (100) feet shall be permitted only after showing of actual convenience and necessity. 6. All driveways shall be so located that the flared portion adjacent to the traveled way will not encroach upon adjoining property. 7, No commercial driveway shall have a width greater than thirty (30) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii.. No noncommercial driveway shall have a width greater than twenty (20) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii. 8. The axis of an approach to the road may be at a right angle to the centerline of the highway and of any angle between ninety (90) degrees and sixty (60) degrees but shall not be less than sixty (60) degrees, Adjustment will be made according to the type of traffic to be served and other physical conditions. 9. The construction of parking or servicing areas on the highway right-of-way is specifically prohibited. Off -the -road parking facil- ities should be provided by commercial establishments for customers" vehicles. 10. The grade of entrance and exit shall slope downward and away from the road surface at the same rate as the normal shoulder slope and for a distance equal to the width of the shoulder but in no case less than twenty (20) feet from the pavement edge. Approach grades are restricted to not more than 10 percent (107). 11. Alldriveways and approaches shall be so constructed that they shall not interfere with the drainage system of the street or highway. The Applicant will be required to provide, at his own expense, drain- age structures at entrances and exits which will become an integral part of the existing drainage system. The dimensions of all drainage structures must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners or their representative prior to installation. NOTE: This permit shall be made available at the site where and when work is being done. A work sketch or drawing of the proposed driveway(s) must accompany application. No permit will be issued without drawing, blueprint, or sketch, <+> GARFIELD COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT <+> SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR EXCAVATION OF ROAD SURFACE AND INSTALLATION PERMIT #: 252-00 D PERMITTEE: TERRY KYLE. INSPECTOR: SUB -CONTRACTOR: 1) ANY OVERSIZED MATERIAL (LARGER THAN 10 INCHES IN DIAMETER), THAT IS NOT UTILIZED IN BACKFILL WILL BE HAULED OFF BY PERMITTEE, FURTHER, ANY FROZEN MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED FROM SITE BY PERMITTEE. 2) WHEN A PAVED OR CHIPPED SURFACE IS CUT, IT IS TO BE REPLACED WITH A MINIMUM THREE INCH (3") HOTMIX ASPHALT PATCH, A TEMPORARY PATCH WITH COLD MIX ASPHALT WOULD BE ALLOWED, WHICH WOULD BE REPLACED WITH HOTMIX ASPHALT WHEN THE WEATHER OR AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS ALLOWS THE WORK TO BE COMPLETED. AN ASPHALT OR CHIPPED SURFACE CUT WOULD REQUIRE THE ROAD TO RE STRAIGHT CUT AND SQUARED BY MEANS OF A PAVEMENT CUTTER OR SAW. A CHIPPED SURFACE CUT WILL REQUIRE A SEAL COAT OF THE PATCH WHICH WILL BE FULL WIDTH OR HALF WIDTH OF ROADWAY WHEN TRENCHES RUN WITH THE ROAD. FOR TRENCHES ACROSS THE ROAD, THE EDGES OF THE SEAL COAT WILL OVERLAP THE EXISTING EDGE. ALL SEALCOATS WILL OVERLAP EDGES BY A TWO FOOT MINIMUM TO INSURE AN ADEQUATE SEAL OVER THE UNDISTURBED PORTION OF THE ROADWAY IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXCAVATION, ASPHALT HOTMIX OR COLD PATCHES WILL BE COMPLETED IN A MAXIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS, WEATHER PERMITTING. 3) WHEN POSSIBLE ALL INSTALLATIONS SHOULD AVOID THE TOP EDGE OF A FILL SLOPE. 4) INSTALLATIONS IN DRAINAGES SUBJECT TO FLASH FLOODING, WILL HAVE A MINIMUM BURY OF 4 FEET DEEPER THAN NORMAL FLOW LINE AT NEAREST ABUTMENT, WINGWALL, OR CULVERT. 5) INSTALLATIONS AT CULVERT CROSSINGS WILL BE BURIED BENEATH THE CULVERT WITH A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN INSTALLATION AND THE BOTTOM OF THE CULVERT, 6) OPEN TRENCHES ADJACENT TO THE TRAVELED ROADWAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED DAILY TO WITHIN 100` OF THE WORKING AREA OF THE TRENCH, AND SHALL BE BARRICADED WITH WARNING DEVICES AFTER DARK. A 3 FT, HIGH ORANGE PLASTIC FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED DAILY TO KEEP LIVESTOCK OUT OF THE OPEN TRENCH AFTER HOURS. 7) IN AREAS BEING DISTURBED WHERE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED, RESEEDING WITH A MIXTURE EITHER BY BROADCASTING, DRILLING, AND MULCHING WITH SEED MIXTURES SUITABLE TO THE CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OR EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE PERFORMED. USE ONLY CERTIFIED WEED -FREE SEED. NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL WILL BE ONGOING ALONG WITH REVEGETATION, 8) THE PERMITTEE SHOULD CHECK THE R -O -W OF SURROUNDING LANDOWNERS TO SEE IF OTHER PERMITS ARE REQUIRED, I.E„ BLM, FOREST SERVICE. FOR GARFIELD Y BY TE4Y KYLE (PERMITTEE) 10/11/20p0 10:00 , 9702577453 CRONK CONST • CRONK ca+srnuc11oN INCORPORATED PAGE 02 11 -24. Sped • end dwnoeion, 00 411011 270•2411.411177, 270417.74Ua (f.*) FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Date: 1 o (11 ( O To: GAP.F,'E1p Cou irff nuitb PiA u 0 C 7>poa,itiv04, Attention: r O Regarding: ktt 4, R.c(ywt,) �D i 6 3o Number of Pages (Including cover sheet) 10/11/2000 10:00 9702577453 CRONK CONST PAGE 01 CRONK 1121 44. woad CONSTRUCTION • Grand Junction, CO IN 1105 INCORPORATED 970.44 0677, 970467-T451Pax) October 11, 2000 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8* Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-8212 (voice), 970-384-5004 (fax) Attn: Arno Regarding: Structural evaluation of 12131nanufacturecl home fa Ten'y Kyle resident builstiniurama Project Location: 10,800 County Road 204 DeBeque, CO 81630 The premanufactured home of reference was inspected by Tom A. Cronk, Colorado registered professional engineer. Home construction consisted of wooden floor joists spaced 16" o.c. and 2x6 exterior bearing walls with studs spaced 16" o.c. Roof framing consists of wood rafters 24" o.c. with plywood/OSB decking and fiberglass shingles. As shown on the building plans prepared for the project, a structural ridge beam will be added to the living room/kitchen roof span to assure the roof structure will support a 40 lbs live roof load. Finally, the family room and master bedroom/mud room additions shown on the building plans are structurally independent of the adjoining premanufactured home. Please call if you have additional questions concerning this issue. Thank - you. Thomas A. Cro , P.E. 1129 -24- Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 303-245-0577 Report Date: 09/29/2000 03:59PM GARFIELD COUNTY TREASURER Page: 1 STATEMENT OF TAXES DUE 1111111111111111. ASSESSED TO: KYLE, TERRY L. & COLLEEN R. 1755 45 1/2 ROAD DEBEQUE, CO 81630 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-98 TRACT:101 DESC: A PCL IN TR 101 CONT 35.97 AC. BK:755 PG:717 BK:728 PG:271 BK:275 PG:135 BK:1117 PG:27 BK:1156 PG:510 BK:1159 PG:423 PRE:R290629 SITUS ADD: RGE TAX AMOUNT INTEREST FEES PAID TOTAL DUE 1999 TAX 22.96 0.00 0.00 22.96 0.00 TOTAL TAXES 0.00 GRAND TOTAL DUE AS OF 09/29/2000 0.00 ORIGINAL TAX BILLING FOR 1999 TAX DISTRICT 029 - J-49HB Authority Mill Levy Amount Values Actual Assessed GARFIELD COUNTY 8.812 2.82 Land 1,100 320 BLUESTONE WATER CONSERVANCY 0.116 0.04 Exempt 0 0 COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DIST 0.282 0.09 Improve 0 0 GRAND RIVER HOSPITAL DISTRICT 5.597 1.79 SCHOOL JT -49 52.128 16.67 Total 1,100 320 71.778 22.96 - TAXES FOR 1999 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES - 01 -JAN -97, REAL PROPERTY - SEPTEMBER 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHECK. P. O. Box 1069 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602-1069 (970) 945-6382 Terry Kyle Subsurface Soils Exploration, Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., DeBeque, CO August 22, 2000 Page 7 Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. By: Edward Principal Engineer GILD Job # 88143 -GJ SbILS DESCRIPTIONS ME& 10.121 * A1C ••ee see• I 00 0 ♦ 0/ It 1 11 7 •• I°. I • 6�" • e 6 e 0 . r • • : 1 • :• i • - . 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 6 1.1 ESCRIPTIOP4 Topsoil • Organic Man -Made Fill GW Gravel Well -Graded GP Gravel Poorly -Graded GM Silty Gravel GC Clayey Gravel SW Sand WeII-Graded SP Sand Poorly -Graded SM Silty Sand SC Clayey Sand ML Silt Low -Plastic CL Silty Clay Low -Plastic OL Organic Silt & Clay Low -Plastic MH Silt High -Plastic CH Clay High -Plastic OH Organic Clay High -Plastic Pt Peat GW/GM Silty Gravel Well -Graded OW/GC Clayey Gravel Well -Graded GP/GM Silty Gravel Poorly -Graded GP/GC Clayey Gravel Poory-Graded GM/GC Silty Clayey Gravel SW/SM Silty Sand Well -Graded SW/SC Clayey Sand Well -Graded SP/SM Silty Sand Poorly -Graded SPISC Clayey Sand Pooiiy-Graded SM/SC Silty Clayey Sand CLJML Silty Clay -Clayey Silt Low -Plastic ROCK DESCRIPTIONS /YMeo4 Otsc-RIPT1OP4 .0;:f..-0%. Sedimentary Rock! .0:4- CONGLOMERATE --ofta SANDSTONE SILTSTONE SHALE xis% X r x CLAYSTONE MUDSTONE COAL LIMESTONE DOLOMITE • 1 MARLSTONE GYPSUM • 1 7177477.1 x our .: Other Sedimentary Rocks N leo / GRANITIC ROCKS DIORITIC ROCKS GABBRO BASALT RHYOLITE T1JFF & ASH FLOWS !:R BRECCIA & Other Volcanics A 7 yY� •�r Other Igneous Rocks .'"7 0 Metamorphic Rocks .1 ✓✓V GNEISS SCHIST PHYLLITE HORNFELS METAQUARTZITE MARBLE `-tiz Other Metamorphic Rocks SYMBOLS & NOTES mem Ongezlical SPT Standard Penetration Drive 09/12 ASTM D-1586 Disturbed Sample Numbers indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 12" Into ground. CS 'California Lined Sampler 09112 Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Numbers indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 1? into ground. D&M 09112 'Dames & Moore Uned Sampler' Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Numbers indicate 9 Wows To drive the Spoon 12" into ground. ST Thin -Walled 'Shelby Tube ASTM D-1588 - 2.625"od 2.5" id 'Relatively Undisturbed Sample' BULK Disturbed, Bulk Sample ASTM D- Disturbed Semple Wx 4 Free Water Table Weathered Rock Formation Test Boring Location Test Pit Location 1--L—.I Seismic or Resistivity Station Standard Penetration Drives are made by drMng a standard 2' od, 1-5/8" Id Split Spoon Sampler Into the ground by dropping a 140 lb. weight 30". No Thinwall Shot Extension and the Samole is Disturbed. Modified Penetration Drives are made by driving a 2-112" od, 1.875" id California Spoon Sampler or a 3" od, 2-3/8" id California Spoon Sampler Into the ground by dropping a 140 Ib. weight 30". No Thinwall Shoe Extension and the Sample is Disturbed, The Boring Logs show subsurface conditions attire dates and locations shown, and It is not warrented that they are representative of subsurface conditions at times and other locations. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS Form No. OJI.DFORM-EXPL Drawn EMM Date 10-15-98 3-D TopeQrads Copyright 01999 Delano Yarmouth, ME 04096 2 suI Scale: 1: 300.000 Detail: 9-4 Datum: WCSS4 SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Kyle Residence, Roan Creek Road 15 Miles North of DeBeque, Colorado Terry Kyle DeBeque, Colorado Date 7-21-2000 Job No. 88143 -GJ Drawn AM J DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 15 SOIL LOG TEST PIT NO. 1 PIT LOCATION IR ELEV.: SOUTH OF PROPOSED RESIDENCE SITE SHEAR Torvans SOIL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf ref o% E �y' I I 1 I I I 1SC-SM ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS FROM ROAN CREEK & HILL to NORTH 95.3 83.3 8.3% 8.2% SANDSTONE, FEW SHALE, SOME CLAYS COLLAPSIBLE SANDS & SLIGHTLY EXPANSIVE CLAYS ST GRAVELS & COBBLES UP TO 4" - MOSTLY No. 4 to 1" SIZE MOST GRAVELS ARE SUBROUNDED to ROUNDED 5 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND LOW DENSITY ST 1 COLLAPSIBLE & VERY COMPRESSIBLE SL MOIST 10 15 otsl uwtn: NO Free Water Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 7-13.2000 DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 SOIL LOG _„- TEST PIT NO. 2 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTH OF PROPOSED RESIDENCE SITE SHEAR Torv+ne SOIL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION p61 pcf °% 1 I ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS FROM ROAN CREEK & HILL to NORTH 80.9 8.1% SANDSTONE, FEW SHALE, SOME CLAYS _ COLLAPSIBLE SANDS & SLIGHTLY EXPANSIVE CLAYS SC -SM SILTY, CLAYEY SAND V. LOW DENSITY ST I COLLAPSIBLE & VERY COMPRESSIBLE SL. MOIST 5 GRAVELS & COBBLES UP TO 4" - MOSTLY No. 4 to 1" SIZE _ __ _- MOST GRAVELS ARE SUBROUNDED to ROUNDED 10 15 15 n t lorai Doptn: Pit Excavated By: NO Free Water Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 7-13.2000 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Kyle Residence, Roan Creek Road 15 Miles North of DeBeque, Colorado Terry Kyle DeBeque, Colorado Date 7-21-2000 Job No. 88143 -GJ Drawn EMM Soil Sample: Silty, Clayey Sand (SC -SM) Geologic Origin: Alluvial Deposits Sample No.: Test by: 1 (TyT1) LRS Natural Water Content (w): In -Place Density (pcf): 8.2% Test Pit: 1 Depth: 83.3 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): GOBBLE to GRAVEL 1 IDD — SAND SILT to CLAI s0 r so 70 e0 50 40 34 20 10 0 1 125 75 50 37.5 25 11. 12.6 9 5 4.75 2 0.65 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.0M Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1i2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 318" 54 510 *20 *40 *100 *200 (mm) 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 iticle Grain Size (mm) % Passing 100 94 94 93 88 75 52 35 20 14.7 14 8 Maglmum Size Allowed By Sampler 2M 5' Effective size Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) Liquid Limit (LL) Ina Plasticity Index (PI) j21 Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio DIRECT SHEAR: CD Uil. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: Cohesion: psf MOISTURE / DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: PAHA Max. Dry Density : psf Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value © 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion 0 300 psi: psf ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): psf Unconfined Compression (qu): psf COLLAPSE of 4.35% UPON SATURATION CONSOLIDATION: 6.33% CD 1921 psf 10.33'& psf at ppm mm Res. D 4718 - 30% Correction pcf FHA Soil Swell: % Swell psf Remolded Sample SULFATE SALTS: GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY Kyle Residence, Roan Creek Road 15 Miles North of DeBeque, Colorado 1 Terry Kyle DeBeque, Colorado Date 7-21-2000 Job No. 88143 -GJ Drawn AM 1 O 0.9 - 0.8 0.7 0.6 11111111111111_•••■■■Illy .1•• ■■!t P�•••■■■■!��••��■■It tea+•■111■■111MINIIIIIIMINII••■■■■ •••■■11■■i�lrlrttar��■ 1•111111111111___..■■■ •111••it•l•■■■■■ �___••..IIwCl�Itlt■•1■■■■■ ��•••■ ■■� nm••I♦■■■!1 _IM11•••1111♦■■ia_iasaiiIV i ___•••■it111111•1111011111l♦•M11♦■1 1111111111MMIIII•••■■■■x•11 M1111♦11■■ 11111111.1•> . - P3 z ■■■��•��•■\�■■ �I• , :r$ , ,,'�71■_____ I61■ ,... ,, ..i■!'�■_1••■►_`\■■ �_•••■■■■��ritl�■tlrarr.3111 �ti_t�t■■■■■�!♦���■■■IA 100 1000 10000 APPLIED TEST LOAD - psf ��••iu111�•u•u1111 ■r■r���.!!1�•uuuilii �•■■BIIIn11111111111u■ II1 �IIII•■II 111\ ! , Ili�.■�...■liw 06, I•I1111111•!'1uinni �_■■�IluI____ ilii �l �•u�H111��•uii111 1000 APPLIED TEST LOAD - psf 10000 1 The Consolidation Test (ASTM D-2435) Was Run By Subjecting The Soil Specimen To A' Seating' Load To Remove Slack From The Apparatus And To Provide An Accurate Point Of Beginning. The Test Begins With The Specimen M Approximate Natural Moisture Content But, The Porous Stones Are Very Moist To Detect Soil Expansion Characteristics At The Light Teat Loads, Prior To Inundation. The Sample Is Loaded To 1025 paf Or Overburden Pressure And Then Inundated With Water. Any Swell Or Collapse Of The Specimen Is Allowed To Occur And The Loading Is Continued. After The Maximum Test Load, The Soil Specimen Is Unloaded To Measure Rebound And Any Swelling Potential Atter Consolidation. LOAD SUMMARY 110 1025 4.35% 0.00% 0.77 16.82 8200 psf SEATING LOAD psf SAMPLE SATURATED SOIL COLLAPSE SOIL EXPANSION /SWELL % SAMPLE REBOUND ■ UNLOAD % MAXIMUM CONSOLIDATION psf MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SOIL #: I SOIL TYPE : SC -SM TEST HOLE #: 1 @ 5' SAMPLE Gs: 2.88 DIAMETER: 2.5" AREA (inches): .03409 SOIL CONSOLIDATION ASTM D-2435 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Kyle Residence, Roan Creek Road 15 Miles North of DeBeque, Colorado Terry Kyle DeBeque, Colorado Date 7-21-2000 Job No. 88143 -GJ Drawn AM INITIAL MAXIMUM LOAD FINAL LOAD SOIL DENSITY (pcf) 85.2 102.4 101.5 SOIL MOISTURE (%) 7.6% 19.8% 20.3% CONSOLIDATION (%) -0- 16.82% 16.05% VOID RATIO (e) 0.963 0.633 0.648 SATURATION (%) 21% 84% 84% psf SEATING LOAD psf SAMPLE SATURATED SOIL COLLAPSE SOIL EXPANSION /SWELL % SAMPLE REBOUND ■ UNLOAD % MAXIMUM CONSOLIDATION psf MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SOIL #: I SOIL TYPE : SC -SM TEST HOLE #: 1 @ 5' SAMPLE Gs: 2.88 DIAMETER: 2.5" AREA (inches): .03409 SOIL CONSOLIDATION ASTM D-2435 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Kyle Residence, Roan Creek Road 15 Miles North of DeBeque, Colorado Terry Kyle DeBeque, Colorado Date 7-21-2000 Job No. 88143 -GJ Drawn AM CRI TICAL LJRAINAGE ZONE roIC£ THE WO TN Of T URIG'NAL Cr' LAVATION LIMIT ( VARIC$ - MINIMUM Or 5 FELT FROM BUIL0INC ) SOIL PREPARED 6' to 8' DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. ROOF DOWNSPOUT USE t0W WATER USC' TYPE PLANTS and/or 'xERtSCAPING" TCCHNrOLIES WTHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING THE NATILV SOILS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE Z0NE' TO BE REWORKED & COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES s---�^— PVC DRAINACC pjPC EXCAVATION LIMIT TILLED for LANDSCAPING riN 1 I SOIL BACKrALL COMPACTED TO WINIMtZC WATER SEEPAGE TO THE FOUNDATION SOILS PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4" did. PVC INSTAL LCD as Per GCOtCCreNICAL ENGINECR SPC CrriCA r10Ns - AS RC WIRED 7 DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAIN CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICC THE WIDTH Or THE ORIGINAL EXCAVAh0N LIMIT ( VARIES - MINIMUM Or 5 FEET FROM BUILDING ) OOT' DOWNSPOUT SOIL PREPARED 6" to 6' DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. VS( !Ow WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS ono/o' IERISCAPING" TCCHNIOU(S WITHIN TH( 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOP( ACROSS LAN05CAPINO DRAIN GUT 1 RAIN PIPE LANDSCAPE FAjS,C 8EN(ATH i GRAVEL/MULCH COVER THE NATIVE SOILS BELOW THE 1 1 SOL BACKFILL 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE , COMPACTED 70 MINIMIZE -----v.- I REWORKED !IC COMPACTED FOR ' WATER SEEPAGE 7O A MINIMUM Or r w[wEs `, THE rouNDArgON soILS r--1 Li t EXCAVATION LIMIT -----10.-11 •�:�.�1, • .4"4 •I 1 05 i d° r1 PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4" dip. PVC INSTALLED a! per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SPECtrICATIONS - AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN— DeVORE, Inc. CEOTECHNICAl. ENGINEERS -GEOLOGISTS EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT sou: NONE DAR: LO r 8-18-98 0—DRAIN 1 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS — GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junction, CO 81505 August 22, 2000 Terry Kyle PO Box 67 DeBeque, CO 81630 TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242-1561 Re: Subsurface Soils Exploration Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., Del3eque, CO As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a geotechnical exploratory program at the above referenced site. Two shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the proposed building pad by the client Exploration pit # 1 was located south ofthe proposed residential site and Exploration pit # 2 was located north ofthe proposed residential site. These exploration pits were excavated to a total dcpth of 6 to 9 feet. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on 7-13-00. The purpose of these pits were to determine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Site Description: The project site is located in the central portion of Section 28, Township 6S, Range 99W ofthe 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. More specifically the site is located on the north side of Roan Creek, between Roan Creek and the Roan Creek Road with Kimball Mountain to the south and the southern most portion of Brush Mountain to the north. The site is approximately 15 miles north, northwest of the town of DeBeque, CO. The topography of the site is that of a small to medium valley bottom. The ground is sloping toward the south, from Roan Creek Road toward Roan Creek. It is our understanding the structure is to be placed approximately 300 to 400 feet north of' Roan Creek and 200 to 250 feet south of Roan Creek Road. This general area is well known for slope stability problems. Several small slope failures arc located a short distance from the building site. A prominent, small slope failure is located on the south side of Roan Creek, immediately south of the building area. Other small slope failures are present along the banks of Roan Creek. Soil Classification: The primary Soil Type encountered in the exploration pits was classified as a silty, clayey sand (SC -SM) under the Unified Classification System. These soils are alluvial and possibly debris fan in origin, originating on the hillsides to the south and possible over bank flood deposits of Roan Creek. These soils arc very stratified, containing fragments of sandstone, siltstone and some shale chips. Most of these fragments are gravel sized but, some are cobble sized, up to 4 inches in maximum dimension. This material is of low to very low plasticity, of moderate to moderately high permeability, and was encountered in a low to occasionally very low density, moist condition. If this soil is found in a relatively dry, medium dense condition, it may undergo slight expansion with the entry of small amounts of moisture, but will undergo collapse/long-term consolidation upon the addition of larger amounts of moisture. This material will consolidate/collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. One Dimensional Consolidation tests using the Consolidation Apparatus, ASTM D-2435, were performed on relatively undisturbed samples ofthe soil. Upon test saturation, collapse of 4.35% was measured, with 6.33% consolidation occurring at an applied load of Terry Kyle Subsurface Soils Exploration, Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., DeBeque, CO August 22, 2000 Page 2 1025 psf. Upon further test loading, 10.3 % consolidation occurred at an applied load of 2050 psf. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this soil, if reworked to a minimum depth of 24 inches below the footings, was found to be 1000 psf, with 200 minimum dead load pressure required. These alluvial/debris fan soils were encountered throughout the entire thickness of the exploration pits, maximum depth 9 feet, and are believed to overlie the Wasatch and Ohio Creek Formations. The Wasatch and Ohio Creek Formations are described as a series of poorly consolidated claystones, mudstones, sandstones and conglomerates. 'hese Formations typically exhibit low to occasionally moderate expansive properties. Man-made Fill: The soils encountered in the exploration pits appear to be native to the site. All building foundations must penetrate any man-made fills which are present at the site at this time, as well as any fills which result from the excavation process. Careful examination of the open excavation will be necessary to determine the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior to the placement of concrete to establish that materials of proper design bearing capacity have been exposed and that no soft spots or debris are present in the foundation area. A 24 hour notice is required for alt field examinations to enable Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide service when needed. Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation of the pits on this site. In our opinion the true free water surface is probably fairly deep in this area, and hence, should not affect construction. Seepage moisture may affect construction if surface drainage is not properly controlled. Due to the assumed proximity of the Wasatch and Ohio Creek Formations and the very stratified nature of soil deposits in the valley bottom area, there exists a possibility ofa perched water table developing in these alluvial soils which overlie the rock formations. This perched water would probably be the result of some increased irrigation due to possible landscaping and roof runoff While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of this exploration the construction process would not be effected by any free-flow waters, it is very possible that several years after development is initiated, a troublesome perched water condition may develop which will provide construction difficulties. In addition, this potential perched water could create some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract. Therefore it is recommended that the future presence ofa perched water table be considered in all design and construction of both the proposed residential structures and any subdivision improvements. Due to the lateral and sometimes upward direction of seepage flow on the site, some areas may be in a near "quick" condition during the runoff months of Spring and early Summer. In this condition, wet areas will lose shear strength and bearing capacity. This must not be allowed to occur on this site. Subsurface drainage is recommended to prevent this condition, in addition to providing proper surface drainage. Positive snow removal and stockpiling provisions will aid by not blocking surface drainage. Foundation Type Recommended: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, underlain by a minimum structural fill thickness of 24 inches, placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated Terry Kyle Subsurface Soils Exploration, Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., DeBeque, CO August 22, 2000 Page 3 spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capac- ity of 1000 psf maximum. A minimum bearing of 200 psf is recommended if the native soils are utilized as structural fill. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within + or - 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single -story, slab -on -grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load phis one half live load, for up to three stories. Structural FiJI/Soil Improvement. Expansive Soils: For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fill is recommended to "mask" the effects of any underlying slightly expansive clays, to allow settlement of collapsible soils and to aid in providing a lesser amount of differential movement of the subgrade soils. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. The existing slightly expansive clays or metastable soils should be removed to a minimum depth of 2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation. The excavation/fill width is to be at least 40" wider than the Footing/Stemwall in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln-DeVore to ensure that an adequate over excavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. At the specific direction ofthe Geotechnical Engineer, it may be appropriate to extensively water soak the over - excavated portion of the site for up to 1 day, prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose ofthis wetting or soaking is to allow some immediate relief from swelling pressures in any slightly expansive soil strata and to aid in compaction and stabilization of metastable strata in theses soils. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and not allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non -expansive, non -free draining man-made structural fill be imported to the site. The upper 6" to 12"(minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (minus 3/4" & GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (minus 3/4" & SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the over excavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of 90% of the soils maximum Modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content + 2%). Very low expansive to non -expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill, if specifically approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils must not be over compacted but, compacted wet of the soils `optimum' moisture content. These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92%ofthe soils maximum modified proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils must Terry Kyle Subsurface Soils Exploration, Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., DeBogue, CO August 22, 2000 Page 4 be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction and be wet of the `optimum' moisture content. These soils must be placed at 'optimum' moisture content or up to 4% over `optimum' moisture content. The structural fill material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2 foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not required to mitigate expansive pressures, but may be used to attain proper balance around the structure. Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 13 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) ofthe soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pef would be appropriate for the native soils. The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. floor Slabs; Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ±2%. Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a `dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Terry Kyle Subsurface Soils Exploration, Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., DeBogue, CO August 22, 2000 Page 5 Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: • Metering the Irrigation water. « Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. ' Encourage efficient landscaping practices. • Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 10 feet of the budding or foundation. • Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping mg irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawispace area. Provided all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required for excavations less than 3 feet below the present ground surface. For fully finished basements or half basement type construction, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems and is therefore strongly recommended. If adequate surface drainage cannot be maintained, or if subsurface seepage is encountered during excavation for foundation construction, a full perimeter drain is recommended for this building. It is recommended that this drain consist of a perforated drain pipe and a gravel collector, the whole being fully wrapped in a geotextilc filter fabric. We recommend that this drain be constructed with a gravity outlet. If sufficient grade docs not exist on the site for a gravity outlet, then a sealed sump and pump is recommended. Under no circumstances should a 'dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Terry Kyle Subsurface Soils Exploration, Proposed Kyle Residence, Garfield County 204 Rd., Roan Creek Rd., DeBeque, CO August 22, 2000 Page 6 Backfill; To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content ±2%). Cement Types Type II, Type 1 -II or Type H -V cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type 11, Type 1-1I or Type H -V cement under any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of al I foundation components rest a minimum of 2-1/2 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Senate Bill 13 (CRSS ¢-6.5-101) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. No. g� I• U� /� , IBUI1LLDI Job Addr ss 1L{ l g -�G`t U Owner VYLL- Fig y Contractor C)LC 0E2, Setbacks: Front Rear j1; Fi Uc:'m Fitt cTlo/,->s Assessor's Parcel No X1(07 -3g3--0o aSi �s — ck V� ..Zuut / 1 �VI L 1, ,L 4'✓� L. .1 I ((G' is „ 1 OAC GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945-8212 7 ' INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY N ( 34?n Permit ' %- Assessor's Parcel No. This does not constitute a building or use permit. Owner's Name P\ YLAE f ltkR Y Present Address PT? Phone 0'X System Location c:R3otl L) FRI4) F, CG Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No rNGO— 5`(t t Lam^ I -(o u X15 SYSTEM DESIGN Lf nOw S 0 r- 1 0 Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Date Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer Septic Tank Capacity Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements Other �,t /,'� ,tt�Q�, Date I�' P. op Inspector "`�j "- RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE •CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25. Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine -6 months in jail or both). White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer PropertySearch 1 Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information Parcel Detail 1 Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail 1 Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number Mill Levy 029 R290716 216732300028 35.939 Owner Name and Mailing Address KYLE, TERRY L. & COLLEEN R. P.O. BOX 67 DEBEQUE, CO 81630 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-98 TRACT:101 DESC: A PCL IN TR 101 CONT 35.97 AC. PRE:R290629 BK:755 PG:717 BK:728 PG:271 BK:275 PG:135 BK:1159 PG:423 RECPT:555049 BK:1156 PG:510 RECPT:554103 BK:1117 PG:27 RECPT:541011 Location Physical Address: 11400 204 COUNTY RD DEBEQUE Subdivision: Land Acres: 35.97 Land Sq Ft: 0 Section Township Range 32 6 98 ' FROM :CCI FAX NO. :970-257-7453 Aug. 03 2005 01:01PM P2 CRONK CONSTRUCTION • INCORPORATED 1129 -24. Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 970.243-0577, 970.257.7453 (fax) August 3, 2005 Regarding: Engineered Foundation and Structural Framing For. Terry and Colleen Kyle residence 11400 CR 204 DeBeque, CO 81630 Client: Tory Kyle P.O. Box 67 DeBeque, CO 81630 970-283-5901 The foundation and structural framing at the above referenced project was constructed in accordance with the plans and specification set forth in the engineered foundation and framing plan for the aforementioned project prepared by this office on September 8, 2000. Seal S (24:C Thomas A. Cronk P 1129 -24- Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 970-245-0577 Garfield County J BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Code Compliance Office 3hackett eegarfield-enann'.c9n: Dear Permit Holder, Please refer to your building permit number 71t6, , issued /0 -/3-00 . A routine review of our open building permits indicates that we have not received a request for an inspection on this permit since 7 ,C -0g . Please be advised that building permits expire, per Uniform Building Code, section 106.4.4. "Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work has commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall first be obtained to do so, and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee." Please contact this office at your very earliest convenience, in writing, to advise us about the status of your permitted work. If you have not responded within thirty days from the receipt of this notice the permit will be closed and a permanent notation will be placed in the property records at the County Assessors office that indicates that the work permitted was not inspected, is not approved and that the building or area may not be legally occupied. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, %n ifollday Daae 24sad Building Inspectors 108 8th Street. Suite 201. Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 Page 1 of 1 Andy Schwaller From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:24 AM To: Dave Mead; Tereasa Baker; Cathi Edinger Subject: Kyle Permit# 7786 Mrs. Kyle will be sending us a check for $210.88 to renew their permit as per one of Dave's letters. She said they will be completing the project pending some electrical work being done. Andy Schwaller Building Official, Garfield County aschwaller(dgarfield-county.com 970.945.8212 8/26/2004 ' 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS I BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued . ..QQ jZoned Area Permit No. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use.N»al FF ROME 1,t) /7 (, Address or.Legal Descjjptjan Owner ) <Yt / / r eI Setbacks Front ineal3 'inane Side Contractor ` L _) Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing , Foundation 11 _ t_oz., 4i, Underground Plumbing Insulation 4 -x..03 9 Rough Plumbing 5-/5-0.3 jyv- Drywall 7-9.5-03 Chimney & Vent 3 - / 3 - rv'3 �- Electric Final (by State Inspector) ) % ;