HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitI
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co . 81601
Office:970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470
Inspection Line: 970 -384-5003
Building Permit No. \ \OC\~
-----~~--~-----------------
Parcel No : 2179-052-02-021
Locality : Sun Meadow Estates , Lot 21
Job Address: 0565 North Meadow Dr, Silt
Use of Building : s/f dwelling w/open & cov patios & attached garage ------
Owner: Sun Meadow Estates LLC
Contractor: Caribou Construction
Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,748.86 Septic : $ 173 .00
Bldg Permit: $ 2,690.5 5 Other Fees :
Total Fees: $ 4,612.41
Clerk : ~~\o r Date: -\JD~t I
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING ~RM~~Rl cA~:t~ . q.q 4 Lj
108 8'~ Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax : 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
PermiiNo : ---------
Job Address:
Lot No:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Ga rage :
10
11
12 Specia l Conditions:
NOTICE
A SE PARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
CONST RUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNiNG THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COM PLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
GRANT ING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
TO VIOLA T E OR CANCEL THE PROVIS IONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LO CAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
OF CONSTRU CTION.
ParceVSchedule No:d Cl\-tfj2-02 -()L\
Wk Ph:
Ph: <2>1 (o -S8 0 0 ~1i ~0~00
-;)C)\0
o Alteration
o Move
Carport:
o Site Plan
Lie . No.
os-7 3 '1
No. of Floors :
'
o Remove
o Single
o Double
Adjusted Valuations: $ ~0 «_I 3 , b 'C)
Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee:
/J'f1 , &'~-
Total Fee :
OCC Group:
Zoning:
A j r:.-j r-v
Manu. Home:
AGREEMENT
~G,:'!j@".£~
Dated Permit Issued:
Const. Type:
Setbacks:
ISDS No. & Fee:
I !?3, em*'
L\C\3 q-t-<>
PERMlSSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND /OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CO:"'STRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIF ICAT IONS SUBMITTED TO AND REV IEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUlLDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT
IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCR IIlED
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE CO UNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VO ID .
THE ISSUA NCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPEC IFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM T HEREA FTER
REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS , SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEII'C
CA RRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF TRS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORD INANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION .
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONST ITUTE AN ACCE PTA NCE Of
ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARF IElD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPEN C IES . THE RESPONS IBILITY FOR THE SE IT O IS
A~D IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE
INTENDED TO BE CONSERVAT IVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. ({£
Garfom.003
I HEREBY AC KN OWLED GE THAT I HAV E READ AND UNDERSTA ND THE AG REEME NT AB OV E (INITI AL):'=~~'-'""-'-.:::---· __ ___
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electri ca l Inspector
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where
readily visible from access road;
3 . A finish ed ro o f, a lockable house, co.mplete exterior s iding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a c omplete kitchen with cabinets , a sink with hot & cold running water, non -
ab so rbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and
refrigerator, all necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and .cold rufll1ing
water, non-absorb ent fl oors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails , guard rail s on
balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements ;
6. Out side grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration
of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. ·
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the iss uance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# _______ _
Date
Bpcont082002
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant
Address
Date
Sun Meadow Estates Subdivision ~~~~~~~--------------
0565 North Meadow Dr, Silt Lot/Block ~~~~------~~----------8/25/2008 Contractor ~~~~--------------------
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Total
Basement:
Unfinished
Square Feet
Valuation
Conversion ofUnfinished to Finished
Total
Garage:
Carport:
Total
Crawl Space
Total
Decks/ Patios
Total
Valuation
Valuation
Valuation
Covered
Open
Valuation
Type of Construction:
Occupancy:
Valuation
Total Valuation
2639 sq.ft
sq.ft
2231 sq.ft
sq.ft X $74.68
4870 sq .ft
sq.ftX $41.00
sq.ft X $33.68
922 sq.ftX $18.00
sq .ft X $12.00
95 sq.ft X $9.00
483 sq.ft X $24.00 :-
802 sq .ftX $12.00
Commercial
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
Sun Meadow Estates
Lot 21
Caribou Construction
363,691.60
0 .00
16,596.00
855.00
Jl15'tt ;l . ~ t:t f. a,l{. (Jl)-
21,216.00
0.00
402,358.60
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant ~ Vt 1M e;,-d()v() E 5i . Date ? b /c; l5 --~.~~~~---------
Building
/Engineered Foundation
f'l/lr Driveway Permit
/ Surveyed Site Plan
~/A Septic Permit and Setbacks
/ Gradeffopography 30%
V Attach Residential Plan Review List
/ Minimum Application Questionnaire
~Subdivision Plat Notes
fJ /A Fire Department Review
/ Valuation Determination/Fees
~Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
V' Attach Conditions
~Application Signed
/ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
J Parcel/Schedule No.
JJ/A 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms.
/ Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES :
Planning/Zoning
J Property Line Setbacks
L 3oft Stream Setbacks
J Flood Plain
~Building Height
J Zoning Sign-off
¢Road Impact Fees
_LHOAIDRC Approval
~ Gradeffopography 40%
~Planning Issues
V Subdivision Plat Notes
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
for
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete
information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that
required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit
issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to
provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans
that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after
it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be
helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code".
This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using
a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
1
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at lea st 18"x24" and
drawn to sca le.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line.
A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar ,
anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-
rap, (which is required), siding or any approved buildi ng material.
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square
foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, wind load of 15 pound s
per s quare foot, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirement s must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC .
I. Is a site plan included that identifies the lo cation of the proposed structure or addition an d
distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1
(7.) Any site plan fo r the placement of any portion of a stru cture within 50 ft. of a
property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision
final plat shall be prepared by a lic ensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and
professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope
of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building
envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the
envelope.
Yes X
I
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05 .0 3 in the Garfie ld County Zoning Resolutio n
if the property you are app lying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Yes ~
(
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the lo ca tion of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacentproperties), streams or water courses?
Yes ""---+.~--
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes ';(
I
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes X
'
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes X
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces's and soffits?
Yes X
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7 ,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes_'f.-A----
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes ';A'
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes X
I
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns and beams?
Yes --j'-'-------
12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to
existing (undisturbed) grade contours?
Yes X
13 . Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado PXh se II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes No ---f-.l..-----
3
14. Does the plan include a masonry fir eplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37?
Yes 'f No -------
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other v erificati on that egress/rescue w indows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the U niform
Building Cq9e?
Yes 1 No -------
16 . Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that w indows prov ide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes JC No ______ _
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors ; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes X No -------
18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnace s, boilers and water h ea ters
indicated on the plan?
Yes 'f. No -------
19 . Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covena_n;s?
Yes 't:_ No
I -------
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeo wners as sociation, it is your responsi bility
to obtain written perm'ission from the association, if required by that ass ociation, prior to
submitting an applic ation for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from
the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refund ed should th e
architectural committee deny or reject your building plans?
Yes 'f. No ______ _
21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes X No Ifno-Explain: I -------
22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the applicati on?
Yes X.
'
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft . wide and
20ft . l o~n ?
Yes No -----
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and o ther
construction code requirements?
25 .
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Yes '£ No _____ _
Do your p lans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes X No _____ _
Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes X No
I ------
Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the application of these changes?
Yes j No _____ _
D o you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Pennit Fee" as
well as any ''Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your
building permit?
Yes '£ No_-:-----
Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?
Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and
from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be
called in by 3:30p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for
inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to
384 -500~.
Yes X. No I -------
Are you aware that requesting inspecti ~ns on work that is not ready or not accessible will
re sult in a $47.00 re -inpsection fee? ~reb ,Db -
Yes ,X No ________ _
Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform
Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy and occupancy of the building?
Yes ;( No _________ __
Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the Uniform Building Code?
Yes }(: No _______ _
I
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal issuance of a building permit application you are
required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfi eld
County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road
& Bridge D0 artment at 625-8601. \-e t-\ex" 6\/\ ~ Lu
Yes ~ No ____________ __
I
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person perfonning the work will be
required at time of applicable inspection.
Yes '/ No ____________ _
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will n eed to fill in
the ParceVSchedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submitta l
of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes JQ No ________________ _
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
best of my ability.
s ~~0Jv~ Date S-f?-oi?
Phone : cy::ro -~1 ~ · 5d-d--o (days); ___________________ (evenings)
Project Name: __ -=~"='=="-..:....:...:.._V\,___V\..:.__:_e.::::.....=..c.._'"'"'&:....:=o{0=-=::...__E$........._,_._,k=ct...~...:e:=S=---------
Notes :
If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review pro cess. Delays in issuing
the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is
determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application
and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed
behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until
required information has been provided and the application rotates again to fir st position for review ,
delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
bpminreq
04/2003
6
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING REQUIREMENTS
Codes: 97 UBC, 97IPC, and 97 UMC.
Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the sides (check subdivisions).
Snowload: 40PSF up to 7000ft. ekvatitm.
50PSF 7001 to 8000tt.
75PSF 8001 to 9ooort.
IOOPSF 9001 to lOOOOft.
Seismic: Zone 1
Windshear: 80mph
Wind Exposure: B
Windload: 15PSF.
Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 to lOOOOft.
Insulation: R·ll Floors over unheated areas
R-19 Walls
R-29 Ceilings
If floors over crawlspaees are not insulated. the crawl space
walls must be insulated. Base~nt walls must be insulated to
frost d~th. Common wnJJs garage to honse mnst have R-19
insullul!m. Common ceilinglftoor garage to house must have
R•ll. Take preeautions to protect plumbing in these garage
artas from freezing.
Geotechnical Investigation
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Garfield County, Colorado
Project No. 27-018
February 7, 2007
Prepared for:
Caribou Construction
734 Main Street
Silt, Colorado 81652
Prepared by:
Yeh and Associates, Inc.
170 Mel Ray Road
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-384-1500
Fax: 970-384-1501
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project No. 27-018
PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................ 1
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................................... 1
SITE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................ 1
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 2
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS ................................................................................... 3
EXPANSIVE SOIL RISK ................................................................................................. 3
SITE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................... 4
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 4
Footings with Minimum Deadload ........................................................................ 4
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................ 5
SLABS-ON-GRADE ........................................................................................................ 6
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................ 6
SURFACE DRAINAGE ................................................................................................... 7
LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 7
Figures
Approximate Locations of Exploratory Borings ..................................................... 1A-1 D
Appendices
Appendix A-Test Hole Logs
Appendix B-Laboratory Test Results
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Project No. 27-018
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation and recommendations
for design and construction of the single family residences on Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21 within Sun
Meadow Estates in Garfield County, Colorado. The subsurface investigation was conducted to
provide recommendations for foundation design, subsurface drainage, below grade
construction, and backfilling/compaction procedures for the construction of the residential
structures. The findings of our investigation and recommendations for construction of the
proposed residences on the subject sites are presented in this report.
The site investigation consisted of geologic reconnaissance and exploratory drilling to
investigate subsurface conditions. One test hole was drilled within the proposed building
footprints and one test was drilled near the center of proposed leach fields. A representative of
Yeh and Associates observed drilling of the test holes. The project personnel examined
samples obtained during the field exploration and representative samples were subjected to
laboratory testing to determine the engineering characteristics of materials encountered.
Based on our investigation, Yeh and Associates completed an engineering analysis of
the subsurface conditions. This report summarizes our field investigation, the results of our
analysis, and our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction, site
reconnaissance, subsurface investigation, and results of the laboratory testing.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand the proposed construction on each lot would consist of a one to two-
story residential structure with a full basement. We anticipate the structures would be wood
framed. The residences would likely be supported on footing foundations. Foundation loads
are anticipated to be between 1 ,000 and 3,000 psf. Cuts on the order of 8 to 10 feet below
existing grade are planned to achieve foundation elevation for the residences. We anticipate
minor grading around the buildings to establish drainage and flatwork.
SITE CONDITIONS
The sites are located on Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21 within Sun Meadow Estates in Garfield
County, Colorado (Figures 1 A through 1 D). The proposed building sites are located on a vacant
parcel within a previous agricultural area. The sites are relatively flat and were previously used
for livestock and other farm operations. Vacant land is located around the proposed residences.
1
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Project No. 27-018
A small ephemeral drainage is located along the west side of Lot 5. Lot 21 slopes down to the
east at grades of less than 10 percent towards an ephemeral drainage. The sites are covered
with grass and weeds.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling one exploratory boring near the
center of the proposed building site and one near the center of the proposed leach field at the
approximate locations presented on Figures 1A through 1 D. The test holes were drilled on
January 18, 2007. The test holes were drilled using a Dietrich D-50 to pre-determined depths
where modified California samples were obtained. The results are shown on Appendix A
Modified California samples were collected using a 2-inch I.D. sampler driven into the
subsoils with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the
sampler constitutes the blow count. For example, a value on the log (Appendix A) of 14/12
indicates the sampler was driven 12 inches with 14 blows of the hammer. The blow count can
be used as a relatively measure of material stiffness or density. The collected samples were
transported to our laboratory where they were examined and classified. Laboratory tests
included moisture content, dry density, swell/consolidation, grain size analysis and Atterberg
limit testing.
The subsoils encountered in the test holes consisted of variable amounts of sand, clay,
silt and gravel. The sand was medium dense and the gravel was very dense. The clay and silt
was stiff to very stiff. Bedrock was not encountered in any of the test holes. Sand samples
tested had 24 to 32 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve) and was non-liquid and
non-plastic. Clay and silt samples tested had 50 to 87 percent fines. Atterberg limit test results
indicated the silt and clay had liquid limits of non-liquid to 35 percent and plasticity indices of
non-plastic to 15 percent. One clay sample exhibited low swell of 0.6 percent and two silt
samples exhibited 0. 7 and 2.5 percent compression when wetted under an applied pressure of
1 ,000 psf. The laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B and are summarized in the
Summary of Laboratory Test Results table.
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test holes during drilling or when the
holes were checked several days after drilling, and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist.
Variations in groundwater conditions may occur seasonally. The magnitude of the variation will
2
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Project No. 27-018
be largely dependent upon the amount of spring snowmelt, duration and intensity of
precipitation, local landscape irrigation practices, site grading changes, and the surface and
subsurface drainage characteristics of the surrounding area. The existing pond when filled with
water could be a source of groundwater that could impact the proposed structure depending on
planned elevations. Perched water tables may be present, but were not encountered in any of
the test holes.
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
Percolation testing was performed at the proposed leach field on each lot at the
locations near boring P-1 (Figures 1A-10). A profile boring (P-1) was drilled near the center of
the proposed leach field. Three shallower holes were drilled around the profile boring. The
shallower holes were used for percolation testing. Each hole was presoaked overnight. The
following table presents the average percolation rate for the three holes.
Table 1 -Average Percolation Rates (min/inch)
Lot5 ·.·
c L¢7. ·· · Lot18 · .. Lot 21 ·. ·
• ' . ··... . ..
Hole Hole Hol.e Hole HolE( .Hole Hole Hole Hole Hole; Hole Hole
1 2 -3 1 . 2 .. ·. 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
17 26 19 4 7 8 5 18 14 6 11 7
EXPANSIVE SOIL RISK
Low swelling clay soils were encountered in Lot 21. Generally, non-expansive soils
were encountered on Lots 5, 7 and 18. For Lot 21, potentially expansive soils will require
particular attention in the design and construction. We believe there is a low risk of poor slab-
on-grade and foundation performance due to swelling or collapsible soils. We estimate
movements of basement slabs and exterior flatwork of about 1 inch or less could occur.
Expansive soils are stable at current moisture conditions. Upon wetting these soils increase in
volume and could cause movement of slabs-on-grade. The amount of movement is dependent
on the availability of water due to landscape irrigation and surface drainage and the structural
tolerances to movement.
Slab-on-grade construction for basement or garage areas is considered acceptable
provided the owner accepts the risk of potential slab movement. The expansive soils can be
3
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Project No. 27-018
mitigated by subexcavation. Subexcavation consists of removal of the expansive soils, moisture
conditioning of the soils and placement as a moisture conditioned, controlled fill. If selected, we
recommend subexcavation to a depth of 8 feet below foundation or slab level or to the gravel
soils, whichever is shallower. Subexcavation can also be performed by removing 3 feet of the
expansive clay below improvements and replacing the material with a non-expansive granular
fill. We estimate potential movements of less than 1-inch, if subexcavation is performed.
SITE DEVELOPMENT
We anticipate cuts of about 8 to 1 0 feet from existing grade may be necessary to reach
foundation level. Fill placement should be minor. Areas to receive fill should be stripped of
vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks
larger than 6 inches can be used in fills. Fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 8 inches thick
or less, moisture conditioned to 0 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted
to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698). Granular soils
can be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Placement and
compaction of fill should be observed and tested by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the materials encountered in the test holes and our laboratory test results, we
anticipate foundation soils would consist of low swelling clay soils on Lot 21 and relatively non-
expansive soils were encountered on Lots 5, 7 and 18. We believe there is a low risk of heave
related damage due to expansive soils and therefore a low risk of foundation movement. We
anticipate foundation movements of less than 1-inch. If the owner is not willing to accept the
risk, a deep foundation alternative such as caissons or micropiles should be considered. If the
owner is willing to accept the risk of foundation movement, the structure can be supported on a
footing foundation designed to maintain a minimum deadload. Recommended design and
construction criteria for both foundation alternatives are presented below.
Footings with Minimum Dead/oad
1. Foundations should be constructed on undisturbed, natural soils. Loose,
disturbed soils encountered at foundation level should be removed and replaced
with compacted fill or the foundation should be extended to undisturbed soils.
2. Footing foundations can be designed for a maximum allowable soil pressure of
4
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Project No. 27-018
3,000 psf for Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21. For Lot 21, the footing foundation should be
designed with a minimum deadload pressure of 1,000 psf.
3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches.
Foundation pads for isolated columns should have a minimum dimension of 20
inches by 20 inches.
4. In order to maintain the minimum dead load pressure, it may be necessary to
design and construct a system of grade beams and isolated footing pads. To
maintain the minimum dead load pressure on footings, a minimum 4 inch void
space should be provided beneath the grade beams between footing pads (if
utilized).
5. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footing can be calculated based on a
coefficient of friction of 0.30. Passive pressure against the side of the footing can
also be considered for the sliding resistance if it is properly compacted. Passive
pressure can be estimated based on an equivalent fluid density of 250 pcf for a
level backfill.
6. Grade beams and foundation walls should be reinforced to span undisclosed
loose or soft soil areas. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an
unsupported distance of at least 10 feet.
7. The soils below exterior footings or exterior edges of slabs should be protected
from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at least 3
feet below finished exterior grade or as required by local municipal code.
8. All foundation excavations should be observed by an experienced engineering
geologist or geotechnical engineer prior to placement of concrete.
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
Basements are planned for these residences. Foundation walls that extend below grade
should be designed for lateral earth pressure where backfill is not present at about the same
level on both sides of the wall. Walls that can deflect or rotate about 0.5 to 1 percent of the wall
height can be designed for "active" earth pressure conditions. For a very rigid wall where
negligible deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth pressure condition can be used.
Typically, below-grade walls in residences can rotate under normal design loads, and
deflections result in acceptable performance.
If on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of
50 pcf for design of below grade walls for "active" conditions. This value assumes that some
minor cracking is acceptable. If negligible deflections are desired, a higher ("at rest") equivalent
5
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Project No. 27-018
fluid density should be used for design. For "at rest" conditions, an equivalent fluid density of 60
pcf can be used for design. These equivalent fluid densities do not account for sloping backfill,
surcharges or hydrostatic pressure.
SLABS-ON-GRADE
Based on our investigation, garage and driveway slabs will likely be underlain by low
swelling clay soils. We believe there is a low risk of poor slab-on-grade performance due to
swelling or collapsible soils. Slab-on-grade movements of about 1 inch or less could occur if
subgrade soils are saturated. If a finished basement is planned for the residence, given the
engineering characteristics of clays, consideration should be given to use of structural floor
systems in basement areas or ground modification, such as subexcavation and moisture
conditioning, to the depths recommended above. The on-site soils, free of organics and debris,
are suitable to support lightly loaded slabs-on-grade. Slabs should be separated from all load
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints that allow at least 2 inches of vertical
movement. Control joints should be used to reduce damage from shrinkage cracking. All fill
below slabs should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry
density at 0 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content.
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface water typically flows through permeable wall backfill and collects at the backfill
and natural soil interface resulting in saturated foundation soils and/or wet basement conditions.
To reduce water accumulation outside foundation walls and in basement areas, a foundation
drain should be installed around the exterior or interior of the foundation walls.
The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter, perforated pipe encased in free draining
gravel. The gravel should be % to 1.5-inch washed rock with less than 5 percent fines. The
drain should be provided with a gravity discharge such as a sump pit where water can be
removed by pumping or daylighted. The pipe should be sloped at a minimum of 0.5 percent and
be installed 12 to 18 inches away from and parallel to the footing foundation. The bottom of the
pipe should be at least 4 inches below the bottom of footing level at the high point. Crawlspace
areas should also be provided with adequate ventilation.
6
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Project No. 27-018
Surface drainage is crucial to the performance of foundations and flatwork. We
recommend the ground surface surrounding the building be sloped to drain away from the
structure. We recommend a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 10 feet away from the
residence for landscape areas. Paved areas can be sloped at a minimum of 0.5 percent away
from the structure. Backfill around foundations should be moisture conditioned and compacted
as recommended in the SITE DEVELOPMENT section. Roof downspouts and drains should
discharge beyond the backfill area.
LIMITATIONS
The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon our data
obtained from the test holes at the indicated locations, field observations, laboratory testing, our
understanding of the proposed construction and other information discussed in this report. It is
possible that subsurface conditions may vary between or beyond the points explored. The
nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. If variations
appear, we should be contacted immediately so we can review our report in light of the
variations and provide supplemental recommendations as necessary. We should also review
the report if the scope of the proposed construction, including the proposed loads, finished
elevations or structure locations, change from those described in this report. The conclusions
and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Yeh and
Associates reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in
writing.
The scope of services for this project did not include, specifically or by implication, any
environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or
prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions or biological conditions. If the owner
is concerned about the potential for such contamination, conditions or pollution, other studies
should be undertaken.
The report was prepared in substantial accordance with the generally accepted
standards of practice for geotechnical engineering as exist in the site area at the tirne of our
investigation. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. The recommendations
in this report are based on the assumption that Yeh and Associates will conduct an adequate
7
Lots 5, 7, 18 and 21
Sun Meadow Estates
Project No. 27-018
program of construction testing and observation to evaluate compliance with our
recommendations.
Respectfully Submitted,
8
NORTH MEADOW DRIVE
LotS
Legend:
TH-llndicates Approximate Location of Test
• Hole for Building Site
Not to Scale
50 100
SCALEI 1, = 100'
P-1 Indicates Approximate Location of Profile
• Hole for Leach Field Approximate Locations of
Exploratory Borings
Project No. 27-018 Figure 1A
Lot7
w >
0::
Cl
3:
0 .1 Cl
i1i
:2
I
li:
0 z
Legend:
TH-llndicates Approximate Location of Test
• Hole for Building Site
100
Not to Scale
NJL 1r
0 50 100
SCALEI 1' = 100'
P-1 Indicates Approximate Location of Profile
• Hole for Leach Field Approximate Locations of
Exploratory Borings
Project No. 27-018 Figure 18
50 100
SCALE' 1' = 100'
Lot 18
Legend:
TH-llndicates Approximate Location of Test
• Hole for Building Site
Not to Scale
P-1 Indicates Approximate Location of Profile
• Hole for Leach Field Approximate Locations of
Exploratory Borings
Project No. 27-018 Figure 1C
~100~~~~0 50 100
SCALE' 1' = 100'
Lot21
ANTONELLI LANE
l
Legend:
TH-llndicates Approximate Location of Test
• Hole for Building Site
Not to Scale
~1
P-1 Indicates Approximate Location of Profile
• Hole for Leach Field Approximate Locations of
Exploratory Borings
Project No. 27-018 Figure 10
APPENDIX A
TEST HOLE LOGS
l ,jyEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: sun Meadow Estates
• ~ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Project Number: 27-018
Legend for Symbols Used on Borehole Logs
Sample Types
D Modified California Sampler. The symbol16/12 indicates that 16 blows from a 140 pound
hammer falling 30 inches was used to drive 2-inch I. D. sampler 12 inches.
Soil Lithology
[[]] SILT, sandy, occasional gravel, slightly moist, stiff to very stiff, brown, light brown (ML).
~ CLAY, silty to sandy, occasional gravel, slightly moist, very stiff, brown, light brown (CL, CL-ML).
l:::t~lJ SAND, silty to gravelly, slightly moist, medium dense, brown (SM).
~ GRAVEL, silty to sandy, slightly moist, very dense, brown (GM).
Figure A-1
~
lj;
"' b
"' ci
0:
" "' "' " '3
"' 9 ~ N
~
"' .,
~ w
" iO
"' w
0 z w ~
g
..c: a.
Q)
Cl
LotS
TH-1
I~
LotS
P-1
Lot7
TH-1
Lot 7
P-1
YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
Lot 18
TH-1
Lot 18
P-1
Project Number: 27-018
Lot21
TH-1
Lot 21
P-1
Sun Meadow Estates
Figure A-2
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
2.0
I
I
I I I I Graph 1 I
I
I
i I
i i ~ 0.0 • i I
f I I '
i I
fl'l WATER ADDED
~ -2.0 = :8
I
I ..
"C I
== I " I "' I = " -4.0 u I ' i I I I I
I I I I I I i I I -6.0 I I
0.1 I 10 100
Applied Normal Pressure, ksf
2.0
I
I II I I ! I I ' I I I 1Graph2
ill i
I
I I
' I I !
I i
I
' ! I '
I I I ! I I I I i
1
I t.. 0.0 I
i
! ! I I I I ! I I I
r I . I
I , I WATER ADDED . I
~ i I
I
I ~
I I
I
I I ' I
!
I II ~ I
' I
i
'
fl'l ! I I ! i i I 8 -2.0 '
'
I I
I I I ' = i I i :8 I . i
I I ' I
1 i I
I .. I ! I ' "C !
== ' " ' I ' "' I = -4.0 " i I I u I !
I I
! I I II
I
I , I
i
I I
I -6.0 i I Ill i I I I I ! 1
0.1 I 10 100
Applied Normal Pressure, ksf
Graph Boring Natural Dry Moisture Swell(+) I SWELL/
.... (ftl Couteut Consolidation(·) Soil Description CONSOLIDATION Number Number '(pci) (%) (%) GRAPH
1 LotS 4 104 6.4 -2.5 sandy SILT (ML) By: RDJ
2 Lot 18 9 99 8.2 -0.7 sandy SILT (ML) .~By: RDJ
'Job No: 27-018 Sun Figure B-1
l'Etl & A 'iNUl :IATES, INC
2.0 ,-----r--;-"T".,....,n-rn--"T"--,1-r"'Tn-n-rr----,:--"T"n-,...--
1 jGraphl
I ~ ' I ~----t--+~~~~~~~~~~~==t=~VV~A~T~E~R~AD~D~E~D~--~-+~~~~
0.0 I I!
I I I
-2.0+-----+--+~~-r++++----~--+-+-~~~~--_,--~-r~~~~H
i I -4.0+-----+---~+-~~+++-----~-+--~~~~~H-----4---~+-+-+4~
I ' '
I I I I
I
I I' I ' II !' I i I I I -6.0 .L..----I.-..I-..J......I....J...J...I..U.--...I...---I.---'--L...J...U...:..I--....J_..J.....J......l....U...L..U
0.1 I 10 100
Applied Normal Pressure, ksf
2.o ~---r-~r-r-rl: l'"'!"":rn !! 11~_,.1---,...1 ..,.!..,...,...I.,..,..' 'I"'T"'I-..,..1-,...1, .,.,,I 1..-Gr-.•P l ...... h'· z
I I I I i I I ' ' i i I : ' 1;
0.0+-----~~---~,,-+~-+~:~H-----~1 --~~~~ +-~:+.~ ~~----~--~-+,-+:-+4!~1~
' • ! I
I I
i • i i r I
1
i
-2.0 -t----j---+-+-1--++-+:r+---+-H-+-+-+++l-----+--+-+-+-+-+-++1
I I ' ! I I : I
'
I I i i i' -4.0+-----~1 ---+-+-+-+4-H-~----~-+--~1 ~+-~~----~--4--+-+-+++~ I I I ! I I
I I I I I • : i i I ! I -6.0 .L..-----1--....I-...J......I..."--..U..I.---......L.--.1-..I.... ............. ...I..I. ____ ...~..._.. __ .._L.....l. ...... .U
• i
• I
0.1 I 10 100
Applied Normal Pressure, ksf
Graph Boring D th (ft Natural Dry
Number Number ep Density (pet)
Moisture
Content
(%)
Swell(+) I
Consolidation(-)
(%)
Soil Description
SWELL/
CONSOLIDATION
GRAPH
1 Lot 21 9 105 6.8 0.6 sandy CLAY (CL) Drawn By: RDJ
2 Checked By: RDJ
Job No: 27-018 Project Name: Sun Meadow Estates Figure B-2 YEH & A i~l U 'I A.TES,1Nl.
0
1000
Gravel(%) i
! Sand(%) I
Fines(%) ' '
Sample
Description:
Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis
Sieve Opening in Inches I U.S. Standard Sieves Size of Particles in mm
12" 6" 3" 2"
' '--
100
16 LL NL
60 PL NP
24 PI NP
SAND, silty (SM)
1" 314" 1/Z" 3/8" 4 8 10 16 30 40 50 100 200 Sieve %
Size Passi~
-------I
~---J -
+ I 1 _-:--------,-ih.: ~--=t~ ; __ ~-Lt--t-~---+-
-t; -}EH~"
3" --:-'--!--i---t---
1
'
j
i
-t·t··-~. i J~' . d*· ---+ +---.-1-----j--~ -1-~---~-i W I ·· ·fil'. ~
. ---r]-+ 1-----i--·-+ i ---
·lf.j_ •.. k ... TT:,····· .··e-···
--j-, .;. .. --·"'=-'! .. :., : : I '
---T"H--~_j--'--.. -u..:c.;~:~j L.;.
_ ----+-.... -+--\----I , ~~--l , --r-
• ' ! t ' ~ ~ u·+=:..;.
I ! .. j •I_Tf, '-\o;=-f
-~ --t+ ,_ t-t ' . -rr--+-,_ : · 1-. ., , iT 7-:: ~=--~ -
i ~ t ---~
,----t-~ ---=_±
t---n-t;::' ,.
..... ~ I
-+ l f---+----+-
""-+ Lt{,
--+·""'-i i ~------! -·
:=tt--i---r-•
'
L
·-1--~ +---
10 0.1
Particle Size (mm)
Project Name: Sun Meadow Estates I~
Sample ID: Lot?
Sample 14 Depth (ft.): Drawn By:
Checked By:
....
·-
--
0.01
2%"
2"
1 %"
1"
%"
%"
%'·
#4
#10
#40
#200
Y eh & Associates~ Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Consultants
SIEVE ANALYSIS
-
-
-
-
-
98
96
84
67
52
24
RDJ Project No.: 27-018
RDJ
Figure No.: B-3
Douicorl OA/?7/?00A
·~ YEH &ASSOCIATES, INC
Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Project No· 27-018
Sample Location Moisture Sample
Lot Test Depth Type Content
Hole (ft) (%)
5 TH-1 4 CA 6.4
9 CA 4.8
P-1 4 CA 16.9
7 TH-1 9 CA 7.3
14 CA 6.9
P-1 4 CA 5.1
18 TH-1 4 CA 4.9
9 CA 8.2
P-1 4 CA 8.8
21 TH-1 9 CA 6.8
14 CA 7.7
P-1 4 CA 5.5
CA-Indicates modified California sample
NL -Indicates non-liquid
NP -lnrtir..::ltP.s non-nl~stic
Project Name· Sun Meadow Estates
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Water Dry Gravel Fines Soluble Density >#4 Sand <#200 LL PL PI Sulfate (pcf) (%) (%) (%) (%)
104 58
115 32
99 50 35 20 15
117 66 23 19 4 0.007
16 60 24 NL NP NP
104 77 NL NP NP
93 66 NL NP NP 0.003
99 65
83 83 NL NP NP
105 87
118 54 27 16 11
105 53 23 18 5
0-:">no 1 nf 1
Swell(+) I
Consolidation (-)
under 1000 psf Soil Description
(%)
-2.5 Silt, sandy (ML)
Sand, silty (SM)
Clay, sandy (CL)
Silt, sandy (ML)
Sand, silty (SM)
Silt, sandy (ML)
Silt, sandy (ML)
-0.7 Silt, sandy (ML)
Silt, sandy (ML)
0.6 Clay, sandy (CL)
Clay, sandy (CL)
Clay, silty (CL-ML)
January 2 6, 2009
Mr. Fred Cooke
Caribou Construction
11854 Bradburn Blvd.
Westminster, CO 80031
~rClwn ~n~ineerin~, ttc.
Strnc.t1-1rPvt I.nji.nuri.n' ~ Jnsrec.ti(Jn5
Re: Lot 21 , Sun Meadows Estates
Crown Engineering, llc. Project No . 02-01 -03-04
Gentlemen:
As requested we have been asked about the bolting down of the steel beams in their respective beam
pockets in the concrete walls and to the cap plates over interior supporting steel columns.
Through my years of experience in the field of home construction, I have not required the bolting
down ofthe steel beam to the concrete wall in the ir beam pocket. Requiring the bolting down of the
beam may actually lead to a weakening of the concrete directly beneath the beam because the bolts
would be placed too close to the edge.
The standard loads from a typical home also do not require the bolting of the steel beam to the
column cap plates . Most steel columns used in home construction are shipped to site with a pre-
fabricated clip that clips to each side of the bottom flange of the steel beam . I do require the lateral
support of the steel beam via Simpson straps to keep the bottom flange from rotating and to keep any
eccentricity to a minimum .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 691-4239.
Ma in Office
524 S tover S treet
Fo rt Collins, Colo rado 8052 4
Phone: (9 70) 498-9537
Cell : (970) 691-4239
e-m ail reyess f5 @msn.co m
GA,I
Garner Associates, Inc_
4181 County Road 311
NewCastle, CO 81647
(970) 876-2210
FAX 876-2209
Garner_harry@msn.com
FIELD REPORT #01
PROJECT; SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 21
JOB NUMBER: 0612
DATE: 10-06-08, 8:00AM
WEATHER: Mild and sunny
The following observations were made at the job site on the date and time listed
above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and
methods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are the
sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made
regarding the soils.
1 _ The spread footing forms and reinforcing steel were in place_ The reinforcing
steel appeared to be spaced and sized in accordance with the construction
documents_
2_ The laps in the horizontal steel appeared to be the proper length_
3. The clearance between the forms and the reinforcing steel appeared to be the
proper distance
END OF FIELD REPORT #01
Harry Garner
Garner Associates, Inc.
GA,I
Garner Associates, Inc_
4181 County Road 311
New Castle, CO 81647
(970) 876-221 0
FAX 876-2209
Garner_harry@rnsn.com
FIELD REPORT #02
PROJECT; SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 21
JOB NUMBER: 0612
DATE: 10-16-08, 8:00AM
WEATHER: Mild and overcast
The following observations were made at the job site on the date and time listed
above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and
methods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are the
sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made
regarding the soils.
1. The spread footing had been poured and the forms stripped.
2. The ICF forms were in place at the basement area. The vertical and
horizontal steel appeared to be spaced and sized in accordance with the
construction documents.
3. The laps in the horizontal steel appeared to be the proper length.
4. The clearance between the forms and the reinforcing steel appeared to be the
proper distance.
END OF FIELD REPORT #02
Harry Garner
Garner Associates, Inc.
GA,I
Garner Associates, Inc.
4181 County Road 311
New Castle, CO 81647
(970) 876-2210
FAX 876-2209
Garner_ harry@msn. com
FIELD REPORT #03
PROJECT: SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 21
JOB NUMBER: 0612
DATE: 10-22-08, 8:00AM
WEATHER: windy and overcast
The following observations were made at the job site on the date and time listed
above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and
methods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are the
sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made
regarding the soils.
1. The ICF forms in the basement had been poured.
2. Gravel was being placed in the perimeter drain field.
3. One side of the garage forms had been placed.
4. the ICF forms had been stripped from areas where the garage foundation
walls intersect with the IDC walls. Reinforcing steel had been doweled into the
IDF wall and epoxy grouted.
5. The double horizontal steel at the top, bottom and mid point had been placed
but had not been spaced or secured.
6. the single horizontal centered vertically between the double steel had not
been placed.
7. The laps in the horizontal steel appeared to be the proper length.
8. Another field visit will need to be made prior to concrete pour. Pour to take
place Monday, October 27.
END OF FIELD REPORT #03
Harry Garner
Garner Associates, Inc.
FROM : MTR I C ITY
Inspection Report
FAX NO. :9234730 Apr. 12 2009 08:08PM Pl
Page 1 of 1
COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD
INSPECTION REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE
Date Received: 13-MAR-09 Permit Number:
665465
Contractor/HomeOwner:
Address:
Type of Inspection:
Action:
MTRICITY, LTD
440 equestrian way
Rough In
Accepted
Comments or Corrections: No address posted No permit sign-off
card found No project manager found Rl approved if this is the
correct location for inspection. Service could not be tagged since
breakers have been landed -only circuits for temp. power can be
used.
Inspectors Name: Robert Fuller
Phone Number: 970-947-8902 Date: 13-MAR-09
COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD
DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES
1580 Logan St. Suite 550
Denver, Colorado 80203-1941
Phone: (303) 894-2985
https:/ !www.dora.state.co.uslpls/real!Ep_ Web _Inspection_ GUI.Process_Page 4/12/2009
COUNTY OF GARFIELD-BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at t2.5?,.s-t7/: .d1/£;,ADou~J
Permit No. 1/tl f Z-
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
ffr:~efj!fF-zdft££:UG-
~ ~I for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date Z--/9 20 ·o~/1
Building Inspector ~ ~~
//
Phone (970) 945-8212r....--
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at
Permit No. --'/_,. ~'----=-(:::9----L<y---=z__=------------
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
$50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date / -3' CJ 20 0/
Building Inspector s=z -L W~
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at ---""O-'b.::.___c6:>_s _ __,A'--'-'-;_· _L_dt'-L."-/'c::--"-/(~JJ"-'t:fl"----tJ __ _
Permit No. -----"/,-'-'/-""o'---"'?----"Z-=------------
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
A/lt:-cD A0J/L. tPLA/ICs c/ v/Z-~P?t",e
231crG-£ g ~~ /"LA v& GAS .4-r G-Atlf(
;:::-'i<&/1/'/"' 8-CPI(oofrt .S if&/Z? 71\.qs: .s
Z2;1t!..s -Ei?( c~ r:'LCJo/!:.. Fl..s-r.-
$C:::,e:,Cvl£ GAs .L.!AI~ hlf/C~L.!fc5
B'{.llforRe-lnspection CJ/..( /29 //f)s?(L,. W,4?L>
D $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspectionc::'AI.CY
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection-at 970-384-5003.
Date __ /"------2=--'--7-----,:=.--20 0 7
~ ,..-// ':""'
Building Inspector --/..,4.//<4~<:<!~~-_i.~~:.,--A~~~-~:=:==---
Phone (970) 945-8212 /
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 05"""""?.:>" ..1( /P!CA Do t-J PR.
PermitNo. //07'Z-
'
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
7"1<CI55 C/M ~l'l:P 75 1£ z_..
@AiA ~ s7Atr?. did J#if'r
'[j}. A P P 70 .l>/CA fC/ A/G ,q,S T 8Y
&od-e ...2/c:::'o «-+ C.t)/V'.?'/A/t(£ 7Ci
~ ~A;rr /b.:sz:= §"A71? p-2:-0 /l)A;L. f'<Ari:s vr~ff/Jr 1'7&/f/r ~Oo/"1-J
~II for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970·384-5003.
Date /-Z.O 20 e?Z:
Building'JT:spector p~ ~
Phone {970) 945-8212
..
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 0~6S: ,AL: ML:"ADow PtK:
Permit No. // & 9 z:_
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
{t!_c:;;./Js L/d£ &'Or aA/o-e:.A: &.c::sso{;f;r
@/'(?1,!'7JJ!,NG-WAs'/L -r--..swr'~L.Y /1/Pr
C;l/f/aG£ ~/(fCSJCI/{F.-GA.t{G£ o/11 a!As4
.!3A.O / £,G:r /liEN <:ON£. Q $1 '--IZ.A 7/C: ~ £ r:-c I( -r LAC-IN 0.1'( .V:
'&Jp_l('i!J:'I?_ V&A(I &vt£K: L/z:"NG--771 lf?h£~<_
70 # .S:5-cr'LA ;f) I< 1£ VI IC w .) L;s r.
$}21£;£ P CL:~tV4/V'c~ ,1/UJ(.(/1/D He(£
{iJ;:'/~/C ,€c;c;;C + ,Cqtf<#AC-Il: /-?P£>.
(;?_ . A//1/ c fiA J7Z:.. c:;;:!.A Y L...l' d £ -G/1 1(.--/-.LJ ~
{Z)!A/S4'C:.A7ii:O cf)«cT wo~K To !3.£ /?..-51
~~!"Call for Re-lnspection C?q'..5 )}7~ or $/(/V£LOP£
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384·5003.
Date / _. "Z Cl 20 0 / --'---
Building Inspector __ __.<:z~~-;-~~L.....k:.k.£.,~~d;,:·::;:;-~9~-=:::__-
Phone (970) 945-8212 ~
'
N 11092 0. ----------~~=-----Assessor's Parcel No. 2179-052-02-021
Date 9/8/2008
BUILDING PERMIT CARD
Job Address ----~0~56~5~N~o~rt~h~M~e~a~d~o~w~D~r~·~S~il~t----~l~DT~2~{L_ __________________________________ _
Owner _______ --=S-=u.:.:.n..:.:M:..:..:e:..::a:..::d:..::o..:.:wc..:E=.:s::..:t:::.at::.::e-=.s-=L=L=-=C---Address __ .;_73'--4_M_a-'-'-in_St'--''--S_il_t _______ Ph one # 876-5220
Contractor Caribou Const Address same Phone # _______ __
Setbacks:
s/f dwelling w/open & cov patios & att garage
Soils Test------------------
Footing -------------------
Foundation ______________ _
Grout _________ ~-----~
Underground Plumbing /C"-Z../·-o,rf ~
Rough Plumbing z. .... ~ ~CP?P~
Framing ?:.-~~ "--.:?9 77-;;z::J
Insulation 2-3 -o9
Roofing ~ ,
Drywall Z-Z:f: ·-7' 2{;«--!
Gas Piping Z. -.5--d7 9<:z0.7
·f GA ;<, A TTl c o/ ~#7/LI/7/ c/11
Other_~----------------------
NOTES ~£} r-f~ z:..-z::.-O~
(continue on back)
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
INSPECTION Will NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
Date Issued _Q__,_-\)~t.____,..'" 0"-=~---Permit No._.\_.___,\ ~'---"'~~"=------
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance oft he permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations
related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is
granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location,
erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the
County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use'Sjt \1lj0pm lCOV p!lltQ'S \-Q\\Qt~ed <ylfncjZ,
Address or Legal Description QJ;(tS Nor~ Mena®J t\r I ~Itt-
Owner Sun "'ent)o~ '51~ Contractor Conbov C.o~.
Building Permit Type ReS\tlri\\\ol..
This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Finallnspectior
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing I Driveway
V:?t{ ~(/'-o_v,
Foundation I Grouting J Insulation &r c;'M;f" OL
Z-;5-a't c;?W.
Underground Plumbing /tJ-'2.(-"'3 V&J Drywall -;:_ --2-1---cj? r. w~
Rough Plumbing Z-:5-CJ't -9N Ele~Fin~ p Stat~"(r~ector)
(Pdo"o Flo. I) !7
Rough Mechanical -z. -~ -CJ ( Septic Final
J)-2? -D 8 ~
Gas Piping Z..-~&>77~ FINAL /-j-/3:~~ _
-----~oLt:u--«<.fi . - -. ·-----~ - ------r~~:>ctric Rough (by State Inspector)
,:,:~:,.:,~,~,, ~ o;{:"iA: ""';(!/)? (You Must Call For Final Inspection)
Notes
Framing "Z--;::; -o '1 ,NJ2 ::JOI.S ,.-~~~e:o 47Uit.
(to include Roof in place &Windows & Doors installed & Firestopplng in place)
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Office 970-94S-8212
, , ~ ,~\>? -'<l i Gienwood Springs, Colorado 81601
DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
APPROVED (\ t\,'"r 1"\. '9f' "[""' J-""'r--
Date __ 'f'",.___,\}U"'-=---"'\JQ~ ___ By f' QfW\aY\
PROTECT PERMIT FROM WEATHE
(DO NOT LAMINATE)
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
AsJ>essor/Treasurer Proged:)r Se<!I'~h I AsJ>e_s~Ql"_S_\lbJ>~1_Qu_ef)' I AssessQr_Sa!es_SeaKh
Cll:Lk_&Rec_order_RecJ;gtion_ Sear_c_h
Parcel Detail I Valuei>etill1 I SaleillJ;tail I Reiildentia!LCoil]l11erciaU!!1JlrovementDetail
Land_ Detail I PhotogffillhS I Mill LeY)' Revenues Detail
I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I
I 020 II R041246 II 217905202021 II 46.145 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
lsUN MEADOW ESTATES, LCC
1734 MAIN STREET
!SILT, CO 81652
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
lsECT,TWN,RNG:5-6-92 SUB:SUN MEADOW
!ESTATES LOT:21 PRE:R005381 BK:549
IPG:615 BK:372 PG:115 BK:360 PG:441
IBK:334 PG:415 BK:217 PG:476 BK:214
IPG:201 BK:213 PG:596 BK:207 PG:315
IBK:180 PG:491 BK:1571 PG:651
IBK:1186 PG:328 BK:1175 PG:878
IBK:1159 PG:829 BK:1150 PG:774
IBK:l150 PG:Sll BK:0565 PG:0163
IBK:0549 PG:0615 BK:1610PG:430
IRECPT:657177 BK:1571 PG:803
IRECPT:648969 BK:\571 PG:801
IRECPT:648968 BK:1571 PG:799
IRECPT:648967 BK:1571 PG:797
IRECPT:648966 BK:1571 PG:749
http://www. garcoact. com/assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountN umber= R041246
I
I
I
I
8/1112008
Parcel Detail Page 2 of4
IRECPT:648965 BK:l571 PG:746
IRECPT:648963 BK:1571 PG:744
IRECPT:648962 BK:1571 PG:739
IRECPT:648961 BK:1571 PG:686
IRECPT:648960 BK:1571 PG:686
IRECPT:648959 BK:1571 PG:655
IRECPT:648951 BK:1571 PG:653
IRECPT:648950 BK:1571 PG:651
IRECPT:648949 BK:1571 PG:649 I
IRECPT:648948 BK:1571 PG:648 I
IRECPT:648947 BK:1571 PG:647 I
IRECPT:648946 BK:1401 PG:325 I
IRECPT:613636 BK:1401 PG:323 I
IRECPT:613635 BK:l301 PG:499 I
IRECPT:591549 BK:1199 PG:619-620 I
IRECPT:567070 BK:1150 PG:515 I
IRECPT:552105 BK:1150 PG:513 I
IRECPT:552104 BK:1150 PG:511 I
IRECPT:552103 I
Location
Physical Address: llsrL T I
Subdivision: llsUN MEADOW ESTATES I
Land Acres: 113.527 I
Land Sq Ft: llo
I Section II Township II Range I
5 II 6 II 92 I
2008 Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: 89,01011 25,8101
I Improvements: oil ol
I Total: 89,ot oil 25,8101
Additional Value Detail
Most Recent Sale
http://www. garcoact.corn!assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountN umber= R041246 8111/2008
Parcel Detail
I I~====~S;;;al~e D~a~te~: I I Sale Price: I
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential lo Buildings:
Number ofCommllnd 0 Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year II Transaction T~(!e
2007 I Tax Payment: Whole
2007 Tax Amount
2006 Fee Payment I
2006 Interest Payment
2006 I Interest Charge
2006 Tax Payment: Whole
2006 Fee Charge
2006 Tax Amount
2005 Tax Payment: Whole
2005 Interest Payment
2005 Interest Charge
2005 Tax Amount I
2004 Interest Payment
2004 Interest Charge
2004 Tax Payment: Whole
2004 Tax Amount
IopQLI?ag~
I
Amount I
($1,191.00)1
$1,191.001
($74.10)1
($80.74)1
$80.741
($1,153.36)1
$74.101
$1,153.361
($1,009.36)1
($40.37)1
$40.371
$1,009.361
($2.17)1
$2.171
($36.22)1
$36.221
8-ssessor Database Search OptiQn~ I IJ~~I$!1IS:r Database Search Options
Clerk & Recorder Dambass:_S.~m:ch Options
http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/Parcel. asp? AccountN umber= R041246
Page 3 of4
8/1112008