HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitI
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Stree~ Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office:970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470
Inspection Line: 970·384-5003
Building Permit No. \ \ oqq_~~-----
Parcel No: 2395-033-00-053
Locality: Pare_~[\ Flood Subdivisi~~-~~~c.:.m:.r::pt::.::io:.:.n ----~-
Job Address: 4339 CR 117 GWS
-------·········~-·--
Use of Building: ---· s/f dwelling w/ op(l_n_ & cov. Patios & at!. Gar~ge
Owner:
Contractor: B&H
-------~··----
Fees: Plan Check: 929.86 Septic: $ 173.00
Bldg Permit: $ 1,~32:_55_ Other Fees:
-~-·,~~""-~
Total Fees: $ -~!533.41
Clerk: ~inJ~--Date: g ·I C2l)er:L I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
!08 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
www.garfield~county.com
Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945-9134)
Sq-t~I2J'g
Use of Building:
(d!.o~
Describe Work:
Class of Work:
New o Alteration o Addition
Gamge: Septic:
Driveway Permit:
i.Q,_
Authority. Titis application for a Building Permit must be signed b t c Owner of the rope , described above, or an authorized agenl If the signature below i.<> not that of the Owner, a separate
letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application.
Legal Access. A Building Pennit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by il1e Building Department.
Other Permits. Multiple separate pennits may be required: (I) State Electrical Pennit, (2) County ISDS Pennit., (3) another pennit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or
County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Pertuit.
Void Permit. A Building Pennit beoomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180
days after commencement.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the il1fonnation contained above is true and correct. 1 understand that the Building Department accept~ the Application, along with the plans
and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy.
Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on
the submittals reviewed by the Building Department
In ooa<>idcration ofthe issuance ofl.he Building Penni!, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and !he Garfield County Building
Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (Coooty Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may he suspended or revoked, upon notice from the Cow1ty, if the location,
construction or use of the structurc(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not ill oompliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable Jaw.
I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to entertl1e property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Pennit docs not prevent the
Building Official from: (1) re<Juiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance: or (2) stopping construction or usc of the strncture{s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation
of County Rcgulation(s) or any other appiicable law.
Review ofthls Application. includin.g submittals, and inspections of the wmk by the Building Departmeut do not coru;titute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the C<mnty of errors, omissions
or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and Cot1nty Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without
!imitation my architect designer ngine and/ or builder.
I HEREBY A N WLE I H EREAD ANDUNDERSTANDTHENOTICE& CERTIFICATION ABOVE:
0
STAFF USE ONLY
Special Conditions:
Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees:
177,609. 2() Cf z_Cj. [3{:; V-1 '3o S:.>
p~r~~}~l Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date:
2;'i37,4 J ({13·'5L\ 15Y1 B7 Tfo4q Ll-4qS
Setbacks: OCCGroup: Const 'I'ype: Zoning:
\4~?-t 7d:T: 6 ~EPT:~
~ ?/?/;%'' / 5/1fs' ~
APPROVAL DATE APPROVAL DAT
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection:
1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the
structore and where readily visible from access road.
3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows
installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all
necessary plumbing.
4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door.
5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks
over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails.
6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building;
7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued conditionally.
8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign offby the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL~ THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED.
OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES
UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit.
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant
Address
Date
Bill & Nancy Flood Subdivision -::2;:;39;::5;;.:C::::R:.:_":'1~17:-:G=w::=s:--..,---,---,-~Lot!Block Flood Exemption
::6:..:12:::3:..:12;:,0:o:0.:::8 ___________ Contractor B&H Construction
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Total
Basement:
Unfinished
Square Feet
Valuation
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Total Valuation
Garage:
Valuation
Crawl Space
Valuation
Decks/ Patios
Valuation
Covered
Open
Type of Construction:
Occupancy:
Valuation
Total Valnation
1490 sf
sf
600 sf
sf X $74.68
2090 sf
sf X $41.00
sf X $33.68
632 sf X $18.00
sf X $9.00
156,081.20
0.00
11,376.00
0.00
180 sf X $24.00 : Lf ~o(o.
486 sf X $12.00 '" S~ ~ ~.
10,152.00
Commercial
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
0.00
177,609.20
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and
it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the
delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall
be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line
for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been
provided to the Building Department.
TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE
SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project
and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design
professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your
project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a
Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing
and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during
design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at
time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn
to scale.
1
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks,
balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and
original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed,
wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your
plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to
the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a liceused surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of
30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the
placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously
surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor
and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be
built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a
copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
IJJi>--
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility
easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the
property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do
apply.
~
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal
System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent
~rties), streams or water courses?
~
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the
~-rt_y_? __ _
2
5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof
of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your
right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept.
of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any
combination. Yon can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 I. See phone book for
other agencies
~ ~
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel
in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
®'------
7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for nuder floor crawl spaces and the
clearances required between wood and earth? • 1 k
Yes No_____ ~
8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and
l!f!js? No. ____ _
9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of
40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind
loads?
~~------
I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
@.----
II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists,
roof rafters or joists or trusses? @' ___ _
12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all
columns and beams?
~----
13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top
of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
iYY'------
14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace plann · stallation including make
and model and Colorado Phase II certifications e I EPA certification
~ No _______ _
3
15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply
with the IRC?
Yes ____ --r-{!!J~------
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from
ing rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and
~~lation for all habitable rooms?
18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing
immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking
surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety
~g for these areas?
~ No ________ __
19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on
~-la_n_? ___ _
20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the
~vision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?
21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting
an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without
it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in
revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans
have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either
~ation or substantial modification of the plans.
22. W~. h" be the only residential structure on the parcel?
~ No Ifno-Explain: __________ _
23. Ha~plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
24. D~if:stand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long?
4
25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code
(!jf/fements?
26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties
zone district?
@--
27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection
~e Garfield County Building Department?
28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the
~ication of these changes?
29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the
time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any
~ad Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?
30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the
requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be
made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in
to 384-5003. t!9--No. _____ _
31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a
~ re-inspection fee?
32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including
approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the
building? @ __ _
33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being
given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC?
~----
5
34. Do you uuderstand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and
Plumber to perform installations and hookups, uuless you as the homeowner are performing the
work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of
~able inspection.
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the
Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a
~ing permit application? Y onr attention in this is appreciated.
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety
issues?
1fJi> (please check with the building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior
to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit?
rY---
38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees
have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy?
Yes ____ _
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of
my abili .
Date
Phone: qz..q.. ·le7'l... '2.'}9J(days); __________ _:(evenings) .
Project Name:_--1Pf'--"(..0""""~'+"''--~{t.,..i2:;a""""'"'"'P~a,j""""'""C£c;..-~-------
Project Address: __ ..ctr.._"S.....,_'j....,_"\.1___,~=-=..o.t-.l.=..t'P_"f-1----'-@2=A1?"--""'=--->(....J.}-.7,._--
6
Notes:
If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not
proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional
information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the
adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates
again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with
construction.
BpminreqDec2007
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant BIll -/Veuc1 Flood Date 6/z-.:;.4 o'
Building
/Engineered Foundation
fo,)M vf.-Driveway Pe~it
__L_surveyed Site Plan
__Lseptic Permit and Setbacks
/ Grade/Topography 30%
LAttach Residential Plan Review List
LMinimum Application Questionnaire
/ Subdivision Plat Notes
~Fire Department Review
/Valuation Determination/Fees
J Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
/ Attach Conditions
_y:'_ Application Signed
Zlan Reviewer To Sign Application
V Parcel/Schedule No.
AJ/A 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms.
_/ __ Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
_{"__property Line Setbacks
/ 30ft Stream Setbacks
f'l/ It Flood Plain
/ Building Height
_Lzoning Sign-off
/Road Impact Fees
t.Jj/1 HOA/DRC Approval
./Grade/Topography 40%
/ Planning Issues
/Subdivision Plat Notes
N 11099 o. ________________ __ Assessor's Parcel No. 2395-033-00-053
Date 9/1 0/2008
BUILDING PERMIT CARD
Job Address ----~4~33~9~C~R~1~17~G~W~S~P~a~r~ce~I~A~F~I~oo~d~S~ub~d~Ex~e~m~p~-----------------------------
Owner Flood, Bill & Nancy Address 4339 CR 117 GWS
Contractor B&H Address 5317 CR 154 #206 GWS
Phone # 928-672-2359
Phone # 970-945-2966 fAK
Setbacks: Front Rear _______ RH, ______ LH ________ Zoning _____ _
s/fwith open & cov. patios & att. garage INSPECTIONS t;./;3-7${!? Z-
Soils Test ---,,--:-;---~=-----------
Footing f-2 '--CB&&Yf
Foundation /,/J-b-& g ,Y:".tU
Grout _______________________ _
Underground Plumbing io-;<-o~
RoughPiumbing 1?-.-;o-og-;t?P?
Framing I z:. ~I z-to 8 -;2td..l_
Insulation /Z..-zz-o9" ~..6:2
Roofing 3 ~~~~d) ~~sw;i1~ing li -i2~f£r-.
f5'CJ, 11S-o.-~ /O-/tf.,-.o'FJ
Other ___________________________ __
NOTES
(continue on back)
I
UIL lNG ERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MA01E UNLESS
if'HIS CARD JS POSTED ON THE JOB
Date Issued __ Of_.L•_)..,Q"'-•-'0'0"'--=-----·----Permit No. _illJ1.,__,_q_._ ______ _
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply With all laws and regulations
related to the zonif'!g, locationj construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is
granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations a1·e not fully complied with in the zoning, location,
erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the
County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
use s If dwel\\1'!9 w/ open '*ro~_i_a+t. fprrAUje
Address or Legal Description Y ~i'?'} CJ?.. 111 __6.._JtW_,__$'--------
Owner ]:1000 1 'I??i\I...VN~. __ contractor_B_d------"\=t'-"'------
Building Permit Type l2 es__.\_,a=e=trhi=_,_,Cl"'..,IL._ ____________________ _
This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing I Driveway
q rJ.fr,-C6 ~\ ·--~-G((
Foundation I Grouting /t'l-(;, . ..-,:/.:}Y:'?C/J .. Insulation / Z. -<-Z O_!j:' y~--v;
Underground Plumbing Drywall I .. :? / -~-, ::~ -12::_ -7 // ....
;CJ-1?--o, ..
Rough Plumbing electric Final (by State Inspect A
/;?. a{;;, l;c L(rr &·
~"' {Prior to in at)
Rough Mechanical 1 2--C. Z> c· 3 fct<:....; Septic Final r-z&!-oil .Jf' :1/JYl,
Gas Piping FINAL ;3 -;-c....-c0:3 ;r-'1/ ..
I;J-;o-og~ ~ Electrk Rough (by State Inspector)
tp,;o,(ozf!/:1~ of-~ (You Must..,.~!! For Finalln5pection)
No~es . c.:f/;;JJA/,C / if:J'? -}("' /J,O£ 17
Framing /Z..-17 t>S' 7"-u--, {)(< 0 .
(to indude Roof in place & Windows & Doors installed & Firestopping in plac.;;j J , _ _J
THIS PERW, -TRANSFERABLE
for Inspection Cali 970-3~4-... t:03 Office 970-945-8212
108 8th S"!reet, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8'1601
DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
APPROVED 1?1 , If\ .f"'IC.:. ~
Date ::..t:J..U.....c~=...,, ____ By -\"-• . r
PROTECT PERMIT OM WEATHER A
(DO NOT LAMINATE)
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 4-;337' c!( 117
Permit No. ,//C? ?9
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
I 5/L:/IC.. /o!'C:~ +-....sw/<:',
2-Hx L../CAK uA/',t:J;e;~ $A.:::Sff/Z sWK.
':5 CA;V'S t2AJ $o/Lc/< 1/AC::v/?: :s, ,
1-. 5£4L ~ A /{f?t.<./A?L-'
s-' ~I q 5££ pool'S,
6 d ~7//C-£. :stYtol{tC pii/?c.JOtZ.
7 VA fi>t<_ /}AI<./(1£1( t/N£l&l< cUf#ouJ :=;;eAr:
8 . 7/£M&£ tV/N!I7ows tAl slli ;l(tJA tl
'1 Gl(/ t L-o;J £ -&71c.t<t o ~ ;::£, gi
£¥/IAKSf NAIS
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384·5003.
Date -:3 -b 20 0 /
Building Inspector F ~~
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 4-3 3 r
Permit No. 1/ t/ ;? 9'
I I
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
,15
/Z AcC
r
0 Call for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date I z ~ .::s I 20 vc!?'
Buildin'g Inspector '77~ . k~
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 1= 137 cl( I I 7
Permit No. // ~ '77
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
r;;e ;c; o70ll7/7& ,A/ fl/~VDS il!V2.sl/
GM ?{ r c:>z&;z: L
0 Call for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re·lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date /"Z... -) 7 20 __5!!_<§'~
Buildinglnspect;,; ~ W~
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at ----'--r:;?_;;. ==-~-'-'-..3-+y __ o:{=.;· '-"'--';'-'-/,--"-/--'7'---------
Permit No. ,t(/ 0 ?;?:
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
$50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correc!ion(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date /CJ-/~ . 20 Oo
Building Inspector _ ___c<;Z7~""""'""~"""";?----"kG4""'. =~~~!!:.~"""-'=""------
Phone (970) 945-8212 ~
222 Main street
carbondale, Colorado
81623:
Phone: 970 704 0243
Fax: 970 704 0243
Fax
To;
Phone:9709458212
Pedersen
Architectural
Services L.L.C.
Date< June 24, 2008
Flood Res. Egress Window Repl""";~.."~-cc;, [Click here and type nam~]
0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply
Dave,
Hore is Egress window replacement Info you requested.
Jess
0 Please Recycle
SV'1-5eYk.,:,t 1V!.J.= filiUs.
14i!
~d W~SC:11 800C tC ·unf £vo0v0L0L6: 'ON X~o Sl?d: WOCJ.::l
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
SUBSOIL STUDY
Hepwonh-Pnv.:lak Gc.·orechnka!, lnc.
5010 Ct1unty Ru<:ld 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8160t
Phone: 970-945-79R8
Fa." 970-945-8454
t:m(li\: hpgeo@hpg;:t)tcch.coin
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
4339 FOUR MILE ROAD
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 107 0772
NOVEMBER 30, 2007
PREPARED FOR:
BILL FLOOD
HC70, BOX8
TONALEA, ARIZONA 86044
P k -,,-1 -~~-· c·-· J -· -~· 6'' ---6 1 "·1 1 9-' 3 68 !98'' ar ~er )l, )-04 -! ""} ~ ,..\llt1r.?\Ui.'l ::,r'nng:'. i l;-1 .)-)) L. ,.. :::>1 rert torne /u--r -1
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at
4339 Four Mile Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure l.
The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design.
The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering
services to you dated October 5, 2007.
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain
information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the
field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification,
compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field
exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for
foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation.
This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions,
design recommendations and. other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the
proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed residence will be one story wood frame construction above a partial
walkout basement and partial craw !space with an attached garage. Basement and garage
floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor
with cut depths between about 2 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation
loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction.
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
Job No. 107 0772
-2-
SITE CONDITIONS
The building area is located inside an existing corral. Vegetation consists of grass and
weeds with stands of scruboak trees outside the corral area. The ground surface slopes
moderately down to the east and the slope steepens to the north of the proposed residence.
Four Mile Creek is located east and below the building area. An existing residence is
located uphill and west of the building area. An existing gravel drive and bridge crossing
provide access to the site.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on October 31,2007. Two
exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the
subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight
augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a
representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I. D. spoon sampler. The sampler was
driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30
inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method
D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or
consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration
resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples
were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2.
The subsoils, below about two feet of topsoil, consist of about 9 feet of very stiff sandy
clay overlying dense basalt cobbles and boulders in a sand and clay matrix. Drilling in
Job No. 107 0772
-3-
the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and
boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content and density. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on
relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figures 4, 5 and 6, indicate low to
moderate compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading with a low
expansion potential when wetted. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I.
No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were
slightly moist to moist.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural soils with some risk of movement. A lower risk
foundation alternative would be to bear on the underlying basalt rock soil.
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system.
I) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an
allowable bearing pressure of2,500 psfwith a minimum dead load
pressure of 1,000 ps£ Based on experience, we expect settlement/heave of
footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about
1 inch or less. Additional movement could occur if the bearing soils
become wet. The amount of movement would be related to the depth and
extent of wetting and the depth of clay soils below the foundation, but
should be less than 1 inch. Footings bearing entirely on the underlying
Job No. I 07 0772 ~tech
-4-
basalt rock materials can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of
2,500 psf with no minimum dead load.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should
also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the
"Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report.
5) All existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed
and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural
granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened
and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should
be dewatered before concrete placement.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be
expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral
earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf
for backfill consisting of the on-site fme-grained soils. Cantilevered retaining structures
which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to
mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth
pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcffor
backfill consisting of the on-site fme-grained soils.
Job No. 107 0772
-5-
All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and
equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward
sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or
retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure
buildup behind walls.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content slightly above optimum. Backfill in
pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum
standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use
large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the
wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the
material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the
backfill.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.35. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of350 pc£ The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads
should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a
moisture content slightly above optimum.
Job No. 107 0772 ~tech
-6-
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-
on-grade construction. Laboratory testing indicates the clay soils have a low expansion
potential when.wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs
should be separated from all bearing walls aod colunros with expansion joints which
allow unrestrained vertical movement. A lower risk alternative is to use structural floors
over a crawlspace. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to
shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4
inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to
facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least
50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can
consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times
of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create
a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls,
crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure
buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent fmish
grade aod sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular
Job No. 107 0772
-7-
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Y, feet deep.
SITE GRADING
The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site appears low provided the
building is located as planned and cut and fill depths are limited. We assume the cut
depths for the basement level will not exceed one level, about 8 to 1 0 feet. Fills should be
limited to about 8 to 10 feet deep. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95%
of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill
placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and
topsoil and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. The fill
should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade.
Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or
flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. The risk of slope
instability will be increased if seepage is encountered in cuts and flatter slopes may be
necessary. If seepage is encountered in permanent cuts, an investigation should be
conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut stability. This office
should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The fo !lowing drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
Job No. 107 0772 ~tech
- 8 -
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface sunounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-
site finer-graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Irrigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy
irrigation such as sod should be located at least I 0 feet from foundation
walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the
potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no wananty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations
indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area.
Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or
other biological contaminants (MOB C) developing in the future. If the client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation ofthe recommendations may be made.
Job No. I 07 0772 ~tech
-9-
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for teclmical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Reviewed by:
LEE!ksw
cc: -Attn: Jess Pederson
Job No. 107 0772 ~tech
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1" =50
--------540.0-------------------------~-'
/
/
+ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ ' '
-----
--~~
~~ -~
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
~
-~~
' /
/
-----4ao.o-/ --------/ /--------/
/
/
/
/
/
+
4Bo.o --
107 0766 ~
He worth-Pawlak Geotechnical
--------/ --___ .,.,
-------
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure I
500
495
490
Q)
(!)
LL
c
0
fd
it 485 UJ
480
475
107 0772
BORING 1
ELEV.= 499'
i9/i2
WC=9.5
DD=i08
27/i2
i9/i2
WC=iB.i
DD=i05
BORING2
ELEV.= 490'
20/i2
23/i2
WC=8.2
DD=i08
24/i2
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
He worth-Pcwlok Geotechnical
500
495
490
m
(!)
LL
c
0
·~
485 UJ
480
475
Figure 2
LEGEND:
TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt and clay, firm, slightly moist to moist, dark brown.
CLAY (CL); sandy, silty, very stiff, slightly moist to moist, mixed light brown and reddish brown, slightly calcareous.
BASALT COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GC); in a sand and clay matrix, dense, slightly moist to moist, reddish
brown.
19/12
T
NOTES:
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample.
Drive sample blow count; indicates that 19 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California sampler 12 inches.
Practical drilling refusal.
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on October 31, 2007 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided
and checked by instrument level.
4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between
material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content(%)
DO = Dry Density (pel)
107 0772 ~
HEPWORTH·P A WLAK GEOTECHNICAL
LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3
Moisture Content = 9.5 percent
Dry Density = 108 pel
1 Sample of: Sandy Clay
~
c :"---..
From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet
0 0 'iii ~~ c --0 r---~---a. "' X 1 w ~ '\
I \ c 2 0
'(;? Expansi n
(f) 1\ Q) upon .... wetting a. 3 E
0
0
4
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
Moisture Content = 18.1 perce nt
* Dry Density = 105 pel
c 1 0 Sample of: Sandy Clay ·u;
c From: Boring 1 at 10 Feet "' Q_
X 0 w
' ~ c ~ 0 ·u; I'-.. (/) 1 2! \ r": Q_
E
0
0 2
Expansi n
upon
wetting
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
107 0772 ~
HeoWorth Powlok Geotechnical
SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4
.
Moisture Content = 8.2 percent
Dry Density = 108 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clay
From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet
"* c 1 0 ·c;;
c I--"' Q.
" ......... w 0
' ~ !'---c r-0 -r-i"Y ·c;;
"' 1 "" ~ ~ I"\ Q.
E
0
0 2
Expansion
upon
3 wetting
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf
107 0772 ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5
HElpworth-Pawlok Geotechnical
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1 Job No. 107 0772
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED
MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORING DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE
(ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (PSF)
1 2 9.5 108 Sandy Clay
10 18.1 105 Sandy Clay
2 5 8.2 108 Sandy Clay
.
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
517938 12/17/1997 02:06P 81046 P815 M ALSDORF
1 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
d-.3'15-033-oo-o5a-
d--?Cfs-o33-oo-o5.:::,
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss
County of Garfield )
At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield
County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse, in Glenwood
Springs on Monday , the 8th of December A.D. 19_21_, there
were present:
___ _!!M.~.<au.rwia.un...!l~. ,.,_SJ.J.mwitwh ______________ , Commissioner Chairman
----"'Jo\l.lh.unLM!YlilaJ.JrtwinJ._ ________________ , Commissioner
___ J.L<l!aiJrr:::.y~MUQcCwrow\lilln ______________ , Commissioner
___ J.Dll.ou:nuDk!.e!;;JFt:JO.l.Ir:l.!d _______________ , County Attorney
___ JJM1liwld;ur:>;:edll..l:Auls:»d~.eo!Lrf;__ _____________ , Clerk of the Board
___ J.C.J:hllJU&,Ck!LLD!!:e~sc;;rhl.eenne~s;__ ____________ , County Administrator
when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-113
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE GARFIELD
COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS FOR WILLIAM & NANCY FLOOD.
WHEREAS, William & Nancy Flood petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield
County, Colorado, for an exemption from the definition of the terms "subdivision" and "subdivided land"
under C.R.S. 1973, 30-28-101 (10) (a)-(d), as amended, and the Subdivision Regulations of Garfidd
County, Colorado, adopted April 23, 1984, Section 8:00 through 8:60, as amended, for the division of
a 6.08 acre tract, as described in Book 493, Page 719, filed in the Offices of the Clerk and Recorder of
Garfield County, Colorado, into two parcels of approximately 4.00 and 2.08 acres each, which proposed
divided parcels are more practically described as follows:
Parcel A:
Parcel B:
See Attached
See Attached
(in the State of Colorado and the County of Garfield); and
would be in excess of 2000 gpd. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the
petitioner demonstrate compliance with the nol/i{tl/~nd that all setbacks can be
met. See additional ISDS information, pages • . Additionally, it would be
required to designate easements for any and all components of the existing septic
system that would be located on the proposed lot.
F. Fire Protection: Two letters by the Glenwood Springs Department of Emergency
Services have been received indicating that the tract to be subdivided by exemption
~i\creat-roblems in the event of an emergency. See letters attached on pages
,....,_,. Staff recommends a plat note concerning wildfire mitigation be
included.
G. Legal Access: Access to CR 117, for the parcel to be created, would be along a
driveway which currently serves the existing residences .and a neighboring parcel,
which crosses over an adjoining piece of property. An easement for access to the
existing residence would be necessary as the driveway would cross the larger parcel
and the adjoining parcel. This easement shall further demonstrate that the easement
has been expanded to include the new lot.
H. Easements: All easements regarding access, utilities, drainage, water supply and any
additional easements would be required to be shown on an exemption plat.
I. School Impact Fees: The applicant would be required to pay the $200 school impact
fee for any new lot that is created, prior to signing of an exemption plat.
IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
I. That proper posting and public notice was provided as required for the meeting before
the Board of County Commissioners.
2. !hat the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and
comp Jete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all
interested parties were heard at that meeting.
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption is in the best
interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of
the citizens of Garfield County.
G) RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the petition, pursuant to the following conditions:
I. That all representations of the applicant, either within the application or stated at the
meeting before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be considered conditions
-L(-
of approval.
2. A Final Exemption Plat shall be submitted, indicating the legal description of the
property, dimension and area of the proposed lot, access to a public right-of-way, and
any proposed easements for setbacks, drainage, irrigation, access or utilities.
3. That the applicant shall have 120 days to present a plat to the Commissioners for
signature from the date of approval of the exemption. The Board inay grant
extensions of up to one ( 1) year from the date of conditional approval, if requested
by the petitioner within the original 120 day period.
4. That the applicant shall submit $200.00 in School Impact Fees for the creation of the
exemption parcel.
5. That the following plat notes shall appear on the Final Exemption Plat:
"The legal water supply for this exemption is subject to curtailment if the contracts
supporting the substitute water supply plan are not renewed."
"The augmentation plan supporting the legal water supply for Parcel B, set forth in
Case No. 94CW344, is subject to reconsideration on the question of vested water
rights, after a period of five (5) years, commencing on the date specified in the Order
of Adjudication of Case No. 94CW344."
"Soil conditions on the site may require engineered septic systems and building
foundations. Site specific percolation tests at the time of building permit submittal
shall determine specific ISDS and building needs on the site."
"The minimum defensible space distance shall be 30 feet on level terrain, plus
appropriate modification to recognize the·increased rate of fire spread at sloped sites.
The methodology described in "Determining Safety Zone Dimensions, Wildfire Safety
Guidelines for Rural Homeowners," (Colorado State Forest Service) shall be used to
determine defensible space requirements for the required defensible space within
building envelopes in areas exceeding five (5) percent grade."
6. Final approval will be contingent on receiving a Jetter of approval from the Glenwood
Springs Department of Emergency Services, prior to the signing of an exemption plat.
Furthermore, the applicant will be required to adhere to all recommendations made
by said department.
7. Control of noxious weeds will be the responsibility of the property owner.
8. That, prior to the authorization of an exemption plat, the petitioner shall provide to
the Planning Department a copy of the fully-executed (signed by all parties)
Judgement and Decree in Case No. 94CW344, a copy of a valid well permit for the
-5-
proposed lot (2 acre lot), a copy of a well completion report for the well proposed for
this lot, the results of a four ( 4) hour pump test, and a statement by the individual
conducting the pump test that this well is capable of serving the proposed use.
(?;") The exemption plat shall clearly demonstrate the location of the existing individual D sewage disposal system (ISDS) and the configuration ofboth lots will be done in such
manner as to comply with all required setbacks. This shall be accomplished by the
designation of a building envelope, on Parcel B (the 2 acre lot). The plat shall also
be required to show the actual location of the well on Parcel B and demonstrate that
all required setbacks are met.
10. That the electrical utility be brought onto the two (2) acre lot via the 25 foot wide
strip of land located along the northern portion of the larger, four (4) acre lot.
-l&>-
----
--~
I
I
I
I
,----~L-------·~~~~~~' I =eN-/'"""'' lli\:;~do:w!,tof MU/1/l ~+dl ~
w~ !5 r<!nwed 1 MILE CREEK 1
;A,f-'¥>r.--,,L-f !3eg.n:/ !:he w..W I?'. trus ~yUd be thrrcd
FOUND
REBAR & CAP
wto IOfoot.,rOIIIl~acl'.:layll? fclmt!-e ~· 0=sl%l'l~.
~of2 ()f"~\rees?Tea~.ef()f" arrt:~""e
ra!u-EI Ef'l'<'<r.r«e lf addit~ ~= ~~ tl-em
I TO BE SET
/ REBAR AND CAP
L.S. NO. 26950
wil:hn
""'
Dave Mead
From: Andy Schwaller
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 8:46AM
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Matt Provost; Dave Mead; Jim Wilson
FW: Flood residence 4339 CR 177
image001.jpg
Please note and add to file.
Thanks,
Andy
From: Ron L. Biggers [mailto:rbiggers@ci.glenwood-springs.co.us]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:03PM
To: Andy Schwaller; Kathy A. Eastley
Cc: 'William Flood'
Subject: Flood residence 4339 CR 177
..t;.4': "ao,.,.. "!',;'/}~<!\ ~ .. -~
Andy, Kathy,
The Flood's completed the wildfire hazard fuels mitigation on their property and access driveway to
our satisfaction and are approved to receive a C of 0 for the new structure at 4339 CR 117,
Glenwood Springs, CO. If you have any questions or need more information from me on this matter
please contact me.
;e..., ~. '91M ~. t;. s. '9. 'D.
9?0-3!14-6483
?~~ze s~ s-.4._.
1
Temp Glass
Corey Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Corey A Skahill [cskahill@pellacolorado.com]
Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:30AM
Corey Johnson
RE: Temp Glass
Attachments: B&H Sashes. pdf
Here is the order for the 2 sashes. B&H is listed as the customer but you will not be billed.
Thanks,
Corey Skahill
Pella Windows & Doors
5072 County Rd #154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Cell: (970) 319-1481
Office: (970) 945-2289
Fax: (970) 945-4419
cskahill@pellacolorado.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Corey Johnson [mailto:corey@bhgencon.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 4:50PM
To: Corey A. Skahill
Subject: RE: Temp Glass
Corey,
Page 1 of2
Please drop them off here at our shop and I will have them stained·before they are installed. Let me know if this works
for you. Thanks for the quick response.
Regards,
Corey Johnson
3/10/2009
Temp Glass
B&H General Contractors, Inc.
970-945-0102 office
970-945-0142 fax
970-319-6057 cell
From: Corey A. Skahill [mailto:cskahill@pellacolorado.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:10 PM
To: corey@bhgencon.com
Subject: Temp Glass
Corey,
Page 2 of2
My apologies again for the non tempered units. I have requested for our service dept to order (2) sashes to be
tempered and replaced on the job. Would you prefer for our service tech to install before staining, or dropped off to you
and once stained come and install?
Thanks,
Corey Skahill
Pella Windows & Doors
Cell: (970) 319-1481
cskahill@pellacolorado.com
**ATTENTION**
This email is intended to be a privileged and confidential conununication. If
you have received this email by mistake please delete it and notify the
sender.
**ATTENTION**
This email is intended to be a privileged and confidential communication. If
you have received this email by mistake please delete it and notify the
sender.
3/10/2009
5317 County Rd. 154 Suite 206
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
GARFIELD
Bus. Phone: (970) 945-0102
Bus. Fax: (970) 945-0142
Cellular: ( ) -
Home Phone: ( ) -
Comments:
Proposal
4339 Four Mile Rd
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
GARFIE
Owner: •.
Bus. Phone:
Home Phone:
No.
Alternate No.
Need Date
Sales Rep. Name
Prepared by
Payment Terms
Architect
080709CS1
8
00/00/00
Skabill, Corey A.
Net30Days
~~~~~::Y~~~::::::::~t~~mm:m:mm:m:::mm:m::m::::::~~J,:mm:::m:::::~~fm~~~m:m:mm:mm:m:m::::::mmm:mmmm:m:::mmm:mmmmmmmmmmm:mmmmmmm::mm::m::m:m::mm:::m:m:m:mmm:mm:mmm:mm:::m ..................... it~;;.# IO ................. QtY: i ....... i9-ii4 X 53-ii4 s~~h Fixed, Fra;.;.;;35 ~-59: Architect Series, Casement,
Notes:
Picture
Not
Available
Notes:
Location: Shape 1Z-Rectangle, Hemlock (PRO!l 0), Glazing 5/8" lnsu!Shld Temp HA
IG, Sept 2007 -Current
Item# -IS
Location:
Qty: I Mise Service-Install ASC Sahshes (2)
Proposal-Page 1 of 2
HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
September 30, 2008
Bill Flood
HC 70, Box 8
Tonalea, Arizona 86044
Job No. 107 0772
Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, 4339 Four Mile Road,
Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Flood:
As requested by Corey Johnson with B & H Construction, a representative of Hepworth-
Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on September 18,
2008 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our
observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this repmt.
We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and
presented our findings in a report dated November 30, 2007, Job No. I 07 0772.
The proposed residence will consist of a single story wood frame stmcture over a pa1tial
walkout basement level and partial crawlspace. The attached garage and basement floors
will be slab-on-grade. Spread footings sized for an allowable soil bearing pressure of
2,500 psfwith a minimum dead load pressure of 1,000 psfwere recommended in our
previous report.
At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in two levels
from about 2'h to 11 Yz feet below the adjacent ground surface. Tbe soils exposed in the
bottom of the excavation generally consisted of sandy silty clay with scattered basalt rock
up to boulder size. Topsoil was exposed in the northeastem tooting line. We
recontlllt:ll<led on-site that the topsoil be subexcavated fi·om footing areas. Results of
swell-consolidation testing performed on samples of the clay soils taken from the site are
shown on Figures 1 and 2. One sample showed low compressibility under existing
moisture conditions and light loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under
constant load) when wetted. The sample showed high compressibility upon increased
loading after wetting. The clay sample with gravel showed low to moderate
Bill Flood
September 30, 2008
Page 2
compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. No fi·ee water was encountered
in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist.
The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously
encountered on the site and suitable for suppoti of spread footings designed fbr the
recommended allowable bearing pressure of2,500 psfwith a minimum dead load
pressure of 1,000 psf There could be some differential movement if the bearing soils
become wet. Topsoil and loose disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to
expose the undisturbed natural soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous
repmt which are applicable should also be observed.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils
exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous subsurface exploration at the
site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk
of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the
excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E.
Rev. by: DEl-l
JZNvam
attachments Figures 1 and 2-Swell-Consolidation Test Results
cc: Pederson Architectural Service-Attn: Jess Pederson
-.. ------=---------Job No, l 07 0772
Moisture Content ~ 7.2 percent
Dry Density ~ 93 pel
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Bottom of Excavation at West Corner
0 --r-!-
1 1-
------...--------/ /
2
/
/ Compression
L11pon
3 wetting
4 \
'if' 5 \
c
0 ·u;
<f) 6 l!'
Q.
E
0 \ ()
7
8 \
9 \
10 \
11 \
\
12
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf
107 0772 HE~GEOTE:HNICAL SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1
Moisture Content = 10.4 percent
Dry Density = 108 pcf
-200 = 76 percent
Sample of: Slightly Gravelly Sandy Silty Clay
From: Bottom of Excavation at Northeast Side
0
t-t-----vv
1
*' ~ /
/ No movement
c upon 0 I' ·u; wetting "' 2 " ~ '\ E
""
0
() 3
!\
4
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf
107 0772 ~I SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 2
Parcel Detail Page 1 of4
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Atlliessor/Ireasmer Prop~rty Search I Assessm Subsel_Query I Assessor S.ales Search
Clerk /II; Recorder Re~\ll)tiou Searcl1
ParceU)etail I Val11e Detail I Sales Detail I Residentilll/ColJl!Ilerciall!!JJlroYe.ment Detail
Land Det!!iJ I P..hotogr.anhs
I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I
I 008 II R080085 II 239503300032 II 60.596 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
jFLOOD, WILLIAM L. & NANCY C.
14339 COUNTY ROAD 117
jGLENWOOD SPRlNGS, CO 81601
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
jSECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-89 DESC: TR OF
jLAND IN SWSW LYING W OF W ROW LINE
jOF CO.RD. DESC: & E OF W LINE OF
jSEC. 3 BK:0493 PG:0719 RECPT:742828
IRECPT:742827 BK:l216 PG:3
jRECPT:571797
Location
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Physical Address: 114339 117 COUNTY RD GLENWOOD SPRlNGSI
Subdivision: I
Land Acres: I 6.07
Land Sq Ft: I 0
I Section II Towns hi~ II Range I
3 II 7 II 89 I
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=239503300032 5/28/2008
Parcel Detail Page 2 of4
2008 Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II 23s,oooll 18,7101
I Improvements: II 339,oooll 26,9801
I Total: II S74,oooll 45,6901
II
Sale Date: I
Sale Price: I
Basic Building Characteristics
Number ofResideutial 2 Buildings:
Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings:
Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics I
TOTAL HEATED AREA: 112,576 I
ABSTRACT CODE·IISINGLE F AM.RES-
. IMPROVEMTS I
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: 112-STORY I
I EXTERIOR WALL: IIT-11 SHTNG I
I EXTERIOR WALL: IIWOOD SHNGL I
I ROOF COVER: IICOMP SHNGL I
I ROOF STRUCTURE: IJGABLE I
INTERIOR WALL: IJDRYWALL I
FLOOR: llsHT VINYL I
FLOOR: IJcARPET I
HEATING FUEL: IJELECTRIC I
HEATING TYPE: IIELEC BS BD I
STORIES: STORIES 1.0 I
BATHS: 1.7
ROOMS: 5
UNITS: 1
BEDROOMS: j3
YEAR BUILT: Jl1973 I
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=239503300032 5/28/2008
Parcel Detail
Tax Information
I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I
I 2007 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,768.64)1
I 2007 II Tax Amount II $2,768.641
I 2006 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,244.06)1
I 2006 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,244.06)1
I 2006 II Tax Amount II $2,488.121
I 2005 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,244.96)1
I 2005 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,244.96)1
I 2005 II Tax Amount II $2,489.921
I 2004 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,274.37)1
I 2004 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,274.37)1
I 2004 II Tax Amount II $2,548.741
I 2003 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,124.13)1
I 2003 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,124.13)1
I 2003 II Tax Amount II $2,248.261
I 2002 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,194.14)1
I 2002 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,194.14)1
I 2002 II Tax Amount II $2,388.281
2001 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,201.92)1
2001 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1 ,20 1. 92)1
2001 II Tax Amount II $2,403.841
2000 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,245.66)1
2000 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,245.66)1
2000 II Tax Amount II $2,491.321
1999 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1,148.87)1
I 1999 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($1,148.87)1
I 1999 II Tax Amount II $2,297.74/
TQP~Q(?ag~
Ass~s;>Qr Database ~e.1JJ_ch Op1iQns I Trea_smerJ)_atabase Search.QpJions
Ckr.k.&: RecorderJ2atal:lase S.§.arch OpJions
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239503300032
Page 3 of4
5/28/2008
Parcel Detail Page 1 of3
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Trea@rer Property_Search I Assessor Sub_seLQuezy I Assessor Sales Sean;h
Clerk & RecoLder ReceptiortSearch
Basic Building_Characteristks I Tax Information
ParceLDetail I Yalue Detail I S_ales Delltll I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
_Land Detail I Photographs I Mill Leyy_Revenues Det~>il
I Tax Area II Account Number 1/ Parcel Number 1/ 2007 Mill Levy /
I 008 II R045123 II 239503300053 II 60.596 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
/FLOOD, WILLIAM L. & NANCY C.
/4339 COUNTY ROAD 117
/GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
/SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-89 DESC: A PARCEL
/OF LAND IN THE NWSWNE. PARCEL A -
/FLOOD SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION. DESC:
I& E OF w LINE OF SEC. 3 PRE:R080085
jBK:0493 PG:0719 RECPT:742828
jRECPT:742827 BK:1216 PG:3
jRECPT:571797 BK:1046 PG:815
jRECPT:517938
Location
I Physical Address: /IGLENWOOD SPRINGS
I Subdivision: /
I Land Acres: / 0
I Land Sq Ft: / 0
II II
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239503300053
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9/10/2008
Parcel Detail
11=1 ===S=ec3=tio=n=~ll=l ===T=ow==;=sh~ip==li:[F====R=~n~9g=e =~II
2008 Property Tax Valuation Information
Actual Value
I Land: 0
I Improvements: 0
I Total: 0
Most Recent Sale
I
I=======S=al=e D=a==te==l: I
_I Sale Price: I
II
Additional Sales Detail
Assessed Value
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential 0 Buildings:
Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
No Tax Records Found
Mill Leyy Revenues Detail
T<m.ll.fJ:'age
I
0
0
0
Ass§s.sQrJ2at<lb!'lse .. Se<JJc.hQptions I Dea'l.WS'.rJd.a.mb.<ls§~Se!).LC.h.Qptions
Clerk & Recorder Database Searc.hQptiQns
Page 2 of3
The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=239503300053 9/10/2008