The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit.M , GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 No. 7764 Job Address L i /S CR 1 , 1,'L' i-+..21,4_ it 66 J Nature of Work Building Permit Use of Buildiu .ii[-. Owner 64 'k, C4 4:2. Contractor Amount of Permits 2 Date Es,at,„I 2 Y) Clerk tir GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION BLEPHONE: (970) 9454212 GARFIELD COUNTY (G ENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO 3"1-50 / / INSPECTION LINE: (970)011011111 PERMIT NO. /9/40 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. Ce ADDRESS: --(Lear I r LOT NO. BLOCK NO. SIUBDIVISIONMXEMPTION z °"r"nu I A mo i?Dhek,TA A itd ADDR"` 4164R C'k' %2.4 SFS of lf � ""*I' 9fS%o3/9 3 INI"M""""j 41•411.tA/ 04418 C / Gfeeo p OC> ' L 03/, !JC,..: 4 ARoancram-1.4AkpAl(iP, '"°�' • 5uM/+t rOR_ eke Q 04i w -FL OF 0.o c "1 0674 mum 10/ .7 eta. FT. orammo f l{ I 7 el `�' NO. Of FLOORS ^7 6 ,/La WC or IKELDENO friAr�?)P 0 4/20e. e'i/ Making WOC 1P RCN010 Cg IAA (riC.e:. . 4 8 eus$ Orwon. i aNlw eAL email °Mon 9 : MRAQ` { O �l�tl ROOM! CARPORT. 4EDWLE N °o°iJRLL I0 j aDRIVEWAY MUMMUMIQ 0 OON MT =WADE DOt0/AL iW T Ci i1/41O OMIT PLN C yS f-) fy^ V RE VALUATION Of WO.! ADIUNTEDVALUAtrON:I /623 7670 I ( P/ /f i/ f✓^ 1P CELL CONDITION' NCP gip 9 - el 6 A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WORK IS SUSPENDED OR AFTER WORK 15 COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT K .OW THE SAME. TO GOVERNING THIS TYPE HEREIN OR NOT. THE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE • LAW • r " • 101 '' iO �l Allitgi NOTICE PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF NULL A.`'D VOID IF WORT: OR CONSTRUCTION WTTHlht 110 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE OR CANC 1 PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR G r •, +CT1ON OR THE PERFORMANCE OF i4 Date i q‘24,90ZONING: authorized ' read and understood oo ' e aEdve. / �' • �J PLAN CHE•L, .41rr /� .� aJ,� d / PERMIT FET;•: /jf ( I d y So TOTAL FEE:,, DATE PERMIT ISSUED; '�` OCC. GROUP: CONST: T�'PE: 2 r-3 1 V- Af SETBACKS: 5 Owner. Contractor Iianuf vr.. - +''l� MA11J HOME: ISDS N do FEE: ro te �% / 50 " Building Dept. Approval/Date j ►r - Planning Dapt. • De AGREE«NT MILMISS ION 15 HEREBY GRANTED TED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND.'OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE A ?ETAILED ON PLANS A.ND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY TIM BUILDING DEPARTMENT. N CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND AND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED B' .ARFIE D COUNTY PURSUANT TO ALTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.201 CRE AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FILL' `OMPLIED WTTH IN THE LOCATION. ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTLRE. THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FRO' ��- COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL, BECOME wu. AND VOID. nice ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHAH. NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING T} ORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN I' _IOI.►TION OF TIES CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. ral. REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER. DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AN SSPONSIBILTTIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATIC 'IJRING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER BL'II..DER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND N SUPPOR _R THE OWNERS NTEREST. T HEREBY AC$NOWLE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDgRSTAND THE i.MENT ABOVE, 1WTFIAL1 G'tea/0g- , /vim ‘07 `0„ei .2 7 VQ, .5`Ag - 8/ -- /erz9 izz &.:52.-/ckt 5-ss7 5/ g fr The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof', a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy,use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # G `Yfif1/r,v Gt Date S v er SDS re -7.0c) • • • • 1 111111 11111 111111 111111 III 1111111111111 519638 01/27/1998 04:03P B1051 P358 M ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) At a REGULAR meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse, in Glenwood Springs on MONr AY , the 26 of JANTIARY A.D. 19, 98 , there were present: Marian Smith John Martin Larry McCown Don Deford Mildred Alsdorf Chuck Deschenes , Commissioner Chairman , Commissioner , Commissioner , County Attorney , Clerk of the Board , County Administrator when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. 98— 06 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR JAMES MAHAN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, has received application from James Mahan for a Conditional Use permit for a Home Occupation and a Studio for the Conduct of Arts and Crafts, in the Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density Zone District on the following described tract of land: S1/2SW1/4 and NW1/4SW1/4, Section 8, T7S, R89W of the 6th P.M. (in the State of Colorado and the County of Garfield); and WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on the 12th day of January, 1998, upon the question of whether the above-described Conditional Use Permit should be granted or denied, at which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the issuance of said Conditional Use Permit; and 3� 0 • t 4111 111111111111111111 I11,111111111111111111111111111111 519638 01/27/1998 04:03P B1051 P359 M ALSDORF 2 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO WHEREAS, the Board on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determination of fact: 1. That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting; and 2. That the application is in compliance with the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended; and 3. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed use is in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that the Conditional Use Permit be and hereby is authorized permitting the use of the above described tract of land for a Home Occupation and Studio for the Conduct of Arts and Crafts, upon the following specific conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a report from a civil engineer, based upon the engineer performing a percolation test, as to the adequacy of the individual sewage disposal system to meet the sewage disposal needs of the structure, for submittal to the Building Department for a permit, prior to the issuance of the Conditional Use permit. 2. That the applicant provide a stamped set of plans, prepared by a licensed architect or structural engineer, to the Building Department for the issuance of a building permit, prior to the issuance of the Conditional Use permit. 3. That the Conditional Use permit is only valid for the home occupation (office) and arts and crafts studio. Further that the building will not be used as an apartment or extra bedroom as noted in the application. The proposed gym and storage may be allowed subject to the appropriate building permit being issued. 4. All other representations of the applicant made in the application or verbally at the hearing, shall be considered conditions of approval, unless modified by the Board of County Commissioners. 5. The only residential use allowed on the property is the existing single family dwelling and the one (1) accessory dwelling in existence presently. 6. The application will be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners in a public meeting 180 from the date of approval of this Resolution for a determination of compliance with the conditions of approval. • • 4110 111111111111111111 IJIIII 11111111111111 1111 1111 1111 519638 01/27/1998 04:03P 01051 P360 M ALSDORF 3 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Dated this 27 day of January , A.D. 19 98 . ATTEST: GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Clerk of the Board Chairman r-. Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote: CO HATRMAN MARTAN T. SMTTH COMMISSIONER LARRY L. MCCOWN , Aye COMMISSIONER JOHN F. MARTIN , Aye Aye STATE OF COLORADO ) •County of Garfield )ss) I, , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 19 County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners • 1 Garfield County Planning Dept. 109 8th St. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 4° OOD sp , Dear Sirs; 8 May 2000 The purpose of this letter is to verify that the property at 0648 County Road 126 (Black Diamond Road), owned by Mr. Jim Mahan, is under the protection of the Glenwood Springs Rural Fire Protection District. Our current District boundaries cover County Road 117 (Four Mile Road) to the area above Ski Sunlight, Four Mile Park, as well as the areas surrounding 117 Rd. This includes Black Diamond Mine Road. From his address above, Mr. Mahan is able to see our Station #4, located at 4654 117 Rd. This letter is again, to verify that the address above lies within our coverage area. This letter is not to be considered in any way as an approval for any building and/or development plans that may be in the process of consideration by the Planning and Building Department of Garfield County. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 945-4942. Thank you. Sincerely, Carl L. Smith, Acting Battalion Chief Glenwood Springs Fire Department cc: Jim Mahan 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970/945-4942 FAX 970/945-6040 J & M PUMP COMPANY 0241 COUNTY ROAD 167 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (303) 945.6159 May 16, 2000 Jim Mahan 0648 Co Rd 126 Glen. Spgs. Co. 81601 RE: Spring water test Attn: Jim, RICH WED NAY 1 2000 After reviewing the spring water supply for your domestic use, the following results were obtained: Water Flow: 15 GPM Storage: 5000 Gallon Fiberglass Tank I feel this water supply and storage are adequate for three single family dwellings with usage of 350 gallons per day per household. If you have any questions, please call Rick, 945-6159. Thank You. J &ump Co. /14 14i4 Richard A. Holub Lic. No. 1196 .1 , GARFIELD COUNTY Building and Planning Department February 25, 2000 CERTIFIED -RETURN RECEIPT # Z 188696562 Jim Mahan 0648 County Road 126 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Mahan: As a result of a site review and neighbor complaints, it has been determined that there may be a violation on your property at the above address. It appears that there has been no attempt to comply with the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 98-06 of the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners. The Resolution requires that a building permit be acquired for the "barn" and that an engineer prepare a report that defines the adequacy of the individual sewage disposal system for the proposed uses on the property. Additionally, the only residential use allowed on the property is the existing house and the one accessory dwelling. Based on observations by this department and neighbors, it appears that the barn is being used for residential use and one of the other structures is being used residentially. Please be advised that the provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended, Section 9.01.06, allows the Board of County Commissioners to terminate a Conditional Use permit. Specifically Section 9.01.06 states the following: Compliance with Conditions of Permits: Upon being advised of an alleged violation of any permit issued by or on behalf of the County Commissioners, the County Commissioners may establish a time for consideration of the alleged violation, upon not less than three (3) days' notice to the party engaging in activity under such permit, and to the owner of the property which is the subject of the permit, at which hearing the County Commissioners may consider whether a violation of the conditions of the permit has occurred. If the County Commissioners determine that a violation has occurred, the Board may suspend the permit until such violation can be corrected or until measures can be taken to prevent a recurrence of such violation, or, if the violation is determined to be continuing or likely to recur and to endanger the safety or welfare of the residents or property of residents within the county, the County Commissioners may terminate the subject permit. It is the staff's position that you appear to be in violation of the conditional approval given to you by Resolution No. 98-06 and that the Board should consider terminating the approval. 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/fax 384-5004 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 P ' \ , 1 If there is not any further communication within 10 days of the receipt of this letter, the Building and Planning Department will initiate the hearing process noted previously to have the Board consider termination of the permit. This may result in additional zoning violation citations and possible legal action. Your cooperation in resolving this without having to initiate any proceedings or legal action would be appreciated. Sincerely, Mark L. Bean, Director Building and Planning 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/fax 384-5004 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 r. GARFIELD COUNTY Building and Planning Department February 25, 2000 CERTIFIED -RETURN RECEIPT # Z 188696562 Jim Mahan 0648 County Road 126 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Mahan: As a result of a site review and neighbor complaints, it has been determined that there may be a violation on your property at the above address. It appears that there has been no attempt to comply with the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 98-06 of the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners. The Resolution requires that a building permit be acquired for the "barn" and that an engineer prepare a report that defines the adequacy of the individual sewage disposal system for the proposed uses on the property. Additionally, the only residential use allowed on the property is the existing house and the one accessory dwelling. Based on observations by this department and neighbors, it appears that the barn is being used for residential use and one of the other structures is being used residentially. Please be advised that the provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended, Section 9.01.06, allows the Board of County Commissioners to terminate a Conditional Use permit. Specifically Section 9.01.06 states the following: Compliance withConditions of Permits: Upon being advised of an alleged violation of any permit issued by or on behalf of the County Commissioners, the County Commissioners may establish a time for consideration of the alleged violation, upon not less than three (3) days' notice to the party engaging in activity under such permit, and to the owner of the property which is the subject of the permit, at which hearing the County Commissioners may consider whether a violation of the conditions of the permit has occurred. If the County Commissioners determine that a violation has occurred, the Board may suspend the permit until such violation can be corrected or until measures can be taken to prevent a recurrence of such violation, or, if the violation is determined to be continuing or likely to recur and to endanger the safety or welfare of the residents or property of residents within the county, the County Commissioners may terminate the subject permit. It is the staffs position that you appear to be in violation of the conditional approval given to you by Resolution No. 98-06 and that the Board should consider terminating the approval. 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/fax 384-5004 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 r, , \ , , If there is not any further communication within 10 days of the receipt of this letter, the Building and Planning Department will initiate the hearing process noted previously to have the Board consider termination of the permit. This may result in additional zoning violation citations and possible legal action. Your cooperation in resolving this without having to initiate any proceedings or legal action would be appreciated. Sincerely, Mark L. Bean, Director Building and Planning 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/fax 384-5004 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SANDER N. KARP DAVID g. LEAVENWORTH, IR. GREGORY I. HALL DAVID H. MoCONAUGHY KELLY D. CAVE TOM IQNNEY SUSAN W. LAATSCFI JAMBS S. NEU JULIE C. BBRQUIST LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1011 GRIND AVENUE 1'.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 Telephone: (970) 9454241 Facsimile: (970) 94S-7336 ltiaweisopris.net May 5, 2000 Garfield County Board of County Commissioners 109 Eighth Street, Suite 300 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 DENVER OFFICE:* THE TERRACENTRE BUILDING 1100 STOUT STREET, SUITE 470 DENVER. COLORADO 80204 Telephone: (303) 825.3993 Facsimile: (303) 825-3997 Itlawdenvoranol.00m +(Please direct 011 correspondence to ow Glenwood Springs Offce) Re: APPlln•dnn for CaniylaWLExemIAyhv ]aures Mahan Dear County Commissioners: This firm. represents Sharon Stephenson, Denis Hines and Kathleen Harris, all of whom own property on Black Diamond Mine Road. We offer the lfollowing comments regarding the application of James Mahan for a subdivision exemption in the vicinity of our clients' property. For the reasons stated below, we urge you to deny the application. Chapter 8 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations governs "subdivision exemptions." This letter will outline the reasons why you should deny the application based upon the criteria set forth in the Subdivision Regulations. A. Applicability of Subdivision Exemption Procedure The subdivision extrnption procedure allows property to be divided Into smaller parcels without going through the normal subdivision procedures set forth in the Regulations.. Section 8:10 addresses the general applicability of the procedure: 8:10 The Board of County Commissioners has the discretionary power to exempt a division of land from the definition of subdivision and, thereby, film the procedure in these Regulations, provided that the Board determines that such exemption will not impair or defeat the stated purpose of the Subdivision Regulations nor be detrimental to the general public welfare. . . f TJhe Board may approve, conditionally approve, or deny an exemption request. F, 1:000‘inttevldemeel 4ABAN-Omatydtc-I rope Z d L18 'ON f31S31 '9 HAOMN3AV31 AdLO:b 4002 'AVIN LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. Garfield County Commissioners Page 2 May 5, 2000 The Board's power is "discretionary." This means that. the applicant has no right to approval. It is up to the Board to determine whether the request is in the best interests of the general public. The Board's discretion includes the power to deny the request or to impose conditions upon the granting of the request. Here, conditions are inappropriate because the applicant has a demonstrated history of disregarding land use conditions imposed by Garfield County. In January, 1998, pursuant to Resolution No. 98-06, the Board granted a conditional use permit for a home office / arts and crafts studio to be located in a "barn" structure on the property. This structure and sewage disposal system had been constructed without a building permit in violation of County regulations as well as C.R.S. § 30-28-205. However, the Board decided to gram a conditional use permit after -the -fact, subject to several specific conditions. The conditions set forth in the Resolution included the following: 1. That the applicant provide a report from a civil engineer, based upon the engineer performing a percolation test, as to the adequacy of the individual sewage disposal system (ISDS) to meet the sewage disposal of needs of the structure, for submittal to the Building Department for a permit, prior to the issuance of the Conditional Use permit. 3. ' That the Conditional Use permit is only valid for the home occupation (office) and arts and crafts studio. Further that the building Will not be used as an apartment or extra bedroom as noted in the application... *** 5. The only residential use allowed on the property is the existing single family dwelling and the one (1) accessory dwelling in existence presently. None of these conditions have been met. To the contrary, the Applicant has blatantly violated the conditions by: (1) failing to submit a report that the ISDS was ever tested or that it is adequate; (2) wilf gly and flagrantly using the barn as an additional dwelling unit; and (3) using more than the existing house and accessory dwelling as residential units. Upon information and belief, a "shed" structure is being used as a fourth dwelling unit in addition to the barn. Further, to our lcnowledge, no building permit was ever issued or applied for with respect to the construction or improvement of the barn. E d 118 'ON E1S31 '8 HAOMN3AV31 WdLO:0002 'S 'ASW LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. Garfield County Commissioners Page 3 May 5, 2000 Since the applicant has ignored prior conditions of approval demanded by this Board, there is no reason to expect that the applicant would comply with any new conditions. Accordingly, denial, rather than conditional approval, is appropriate. Further, granting this request would impair or defeat the stated purpose of the Subdivision Regulations. That purpose is stated in Section 1:21, which provides in relevant part: The Subdivision Regulations are designed and enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety and we flare of the present and future inhabitants of Garfield County by encouraging orderly development, in accordance with established County policies and plans. Here, the history of the subdivision shows an intent to evade normal procedures and to create numerous lots without going through such procedures. The history described below is based upon our review of the chain of title as shown in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. This 20 acre parcel was originally part of a 260 acre parcel acquired in 1966 by William Davies, Lue Ellen Davies . Charles Davies, Adeline Cleary, and Alice Kummer (hereinafter the "1966 Owners"). On May 20, 1974, the 1966 Owners conveyed the 260 acre parcel to seven (7) different grantees, all with a common address of 444 White Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado. The deeds were all recorded simultaneously and were subject to a single deed of trust, which means that there was a single promissory note for all seven (7) parcels. Five (5) of the seven (7) conveyances were for 40 acre parcels and were therefor not covered by the County Subdivision Regulations in effect at the time. The other two (2) conveyances were less than 35 acres but did not go through the subdivision regulation or exemption process and were, therefore, illegal subdivisions. Regardless of this illegality, the above transaction demonstrates that the intent was to effectuate a common subdivision scheme. After this conveyance in 1974, some of the parcels were further subdivided through the County subdivision exemption process. Restrictions against resubdivision were included in the deeds each time one of the parcels was further subdivided. These restrictions are substantially identical for all of the various parcels and further indicate that this was a common subdivision scheme. The 20 -acre parcel owned by the Applicant presently at issue was one (1) of three (3) lots created out of one of the 40 -acre parcels, and included a restriction on resubdivision, which the Board of County Commissioners approved on October 20, 1975. RA.2aoou.eUe-uw„oI ARAN•Countr1I1.wpd 'd 118.0N H1bOMN3AV31 WdLO:i OHM'S 'AVIV LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. Garfield County Commissioners Page 4 May 5, 2000 As of this time, at least thirteen (13) lots have been created out of the original 260 -acre parcel, without ever going through a formal subdivision process. Permitting the creation of yet another lot would thwart the intent of the Subdivision Regulations to provide for the orderly and considered development of subdivided land. B. Submittal Requirements Section 8:42 seta forth supplemental submittal information to be filed with an application for a subdivision exemption, Section 8:42(11) requires: It shall be demonstrated that the parcel existed, as described on January 1, 1973, or rhe parcel, as it exists presently, is one (1) of not more than three (3) parcels created from a larger parcel, as it existed on January 1, 1973. The applicant cannot demonstrate this fact as requited. As discussed above, the property was part of a 260 acre parcel as of January 1, 1973. That parcel was divided Into seven (7) smaller parcels. Those seven (7) were later divided into more parcels, including the 20 -acre parcel at -issue here, The subject property is actually one of at least thirteen (13) parcels created out of the original 260 -acre parcel that existed prior to January 1, 1973. Because the applicant cannot make the demonstration required by the code, the land does not qualify for a subdivision exemption. C. Review Criteria Section 8:51 of the County Regulations requires the Board to consider all of the review criteria in Section 8:52, and the Board may also consider the factors listed in Sections 8:60 and 8:10. The factors under Section 8:10 have been addressed above. The mandatory criteria under Section 8:52 include the following: A. No more than a total of four (4) lots, parcels, interests or dwelling units will be created from any parcel, as that parcel was described in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office on January 1, 1973. In order to paid for exemption, the parcel as it existed on January 1, 1973, must have been larger than thirty-five (35) acres in size at that time and not part of a recorded subdivision; however, any parcel to be divided by exemption that split by a public right-of-way (State or Federal Highway, County road or railroad), preventing joint use of the proposed tracts and the division occurs along the public right-of-way, such parcels thereby created may. in the discretion r 'the Board. not be considered to have been created by exemption with regard to the four (4) lot, parcel, interest or dwelling unit limitation otherwise applicable. (Emphasis added). P,1200041.uhut-mmumAAXAtl•CoueY-llrl.Wpd S d 118 '0N f3231. '9 HAOMN3AV31 Wd80:ti 0002 'S 'AVW LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. Garfield County Commissioners Page 5 May 5, 2000 As described above, this 20 acre parcel is actually one of at least thirteen (13) separate parcels that have been carved out of the original 260 acre parcel that existed as of January 1, 1973, Therefore, it does not qualify for exemption unless an exception applies. Here. the applicant is relying on the "county road" exception to justify splitting the 20 acre parcel. However, the applicant has not demonstrated that the county road prevents joint use of the proposed tracts. The zoning for the property allows one single-family dwelling and one accessory dwelling unit per lot. Presently, the single-family dwelling is located on the north side of the county road, and a cottage on the south side serves as the accessory dwelling unit. Thus, the two tracts are already being used "jointly" to obtain the maximum number of dwelling units (1 main dwelling plus 1 accessory unit) on.the 20 acre property. These uses have existed for many years. The Applicant cannot establish that the public right-of-way prevents the joint use of the proposed tracts. Further, while the Board "may" apply the county road exception to permit otherwise illegal subdivision exemptions, it is not required to do so. As demonstrated by the history of conveyances described above, the landowners have taken advantage of every possible exception and procedure to maximize the number of lots without going through the subdivision process. Under these circumstances, it would be inappropriate for the Board to allow a discretionary exception to apply so as to create even more lots, and thereby permit two (2) additional accessory dwelling units per lot under the zoning, without complete review under the normal subdivision procedures. • B. 411 Garfield County zoning requirements will be met. The barn structure is currently being used as a third dwelling unit on the property in direct violation of the zone regulations and in further violation of the Resolution 98-06. There is also some evidence, which we intend to present at your hearing on May 8, 2000, to suggest that a shod on the property may be used as a fourth dwelling unit. The Applicant continues these infractions despite a series of letters from the County regarding the zoning violations and despite the fact that the construction and use of some of the structures are in violation of zoning regulations and illegal pursuant to C.R.S. ft 30-28-124 and 124.5. Those statutes provide for both civil and criminal penalties, but the Applicant remains undeterred. Due to the Applicant's history of ignoring zoning requirements despite express warnings from the County, there is every reason to expect that zoning requirements will not be met if the application is granted. D. ... a suitable type of sewage disposal to serve each proposed lot. One of the conditions of Resolution 98-06 required the applicant to submit proof that the sewage disposal system attached to the barn had been approved by a certified engineer. The Applicant failed to meet this condition. The failure to meet the condition suggests that either (1) FA2000N.egerstMenoslMA HAi-Caunty-th-I . Wpd 9 'd 118 ON U1S31. I HAOMN3AV31 Wd80:000/ 'S 'AVW LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. Garfield County Commissioners Page 6 May 5, 2000 the Applicant has no regard for such conditions and intends to ignore County regulations or any conditions imposed by this Board; or (2) the Applicant was unable to obtain certification from an engineer because the system is unsafe. Either way, the failure to submit proof that the sewage disposal system is an adequate reason to deny the application. The additional factors under Section 8:60 include the. following: F. Number of lots and/or nuchlpledwelling units created by the proposed exemption. As stated above, granting the request would effectively result in the creation of a total of at least fourteen (14) lots out of the original 260 -acre parcel that existed in 1973, all without formal subdivision review. Additionally, granting the request here would create two (2) new lots, . which would each be entitled to a main house plus an accessory dwelling unit. The balm is currently being used as a dwelling unit despite the current zoning, and a shed is allegedly being used a fourth dwelling unit. Granting the request would essentially sanction these zoning violations and would have dangerous precedential value. The message to property owners would be to build whatever you want and seek approval after the fact. This is antithetical to the concept of land use "planning." A. Additional Considerations As stated above, the Board has broad discretion to grant or deny subdivision exemptions based upon the best interests of the general public. We believe that the Board should consider these additional issues: ViolationsViolationsi Covenan a. The Applicant submitted an identical application for a subdivision exemption in 1989 that was never finalized due to a conflict with covenants on the land that prohibited further subdivision of the property. The covenants at issue,' recorded in Book 477 at Page 469 in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder, clearly states: "Resubdivision. No tract of land may be resubdivided into smaller tracts of land." The Applicant verbally represented to the County that the covenants have been terminated. The Applicant has offered no evidence demonstrating the termination of the covenants and we believe they are still in effect. The covenants state that they shall be binding upon all parties until January 1, 2000, and shall be automatically extended for successive ten (10) year periods unless otherwise changed by a vote of the then majority of tract owners. As discussed above, the subdivision of the original 260 -acre parcel was a common subdivision scheme with substantially identical covenants and restrictions applying to the parcels. Therefore, to change the covenants on January 1, 2000, a majority vote of all the tract owners within the original 260 -acre parcel was necessary. No notice 12,120004-eners-Manor MAHANCoumyltr1.rrpd L. d LL8 'ON X31S31 H1aOMN3AV31 Wd60 ;17 0041 'S '401 LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. Garfield County Commissioners Page 7 Mays, 2000 of a vote was provided to all of the tract owners, therefore the recorded covenants were renewed for another ten (10) year period. This application for a subdivision exemption is in direct conflict with restrictive covenants on the property. The County Resolution that approved the subdivision exemption by which the Applicant's parcel was created stated that "[t]his exemption is granted upon the specific condition that all agreements, covenants, and conditions set forth in the petition be complied with." The covenants quoted above were a condition of approval of the subdivision creating the Applicant's lot. Therefore, as a condition of both the County approval and protective covenants, any resubdivision of this parcel is prohibited. Hillitt.a19411X. Our clients indicate that the physical water supply in this area is extremely limited. As discussed herein, an approval of this application will potentially result in additional dwelling units on each newly created parcel. Therefore, we believe the County should require long-term pump tests on the Applicant's well that are conducted in the dry season to demonstrate an adequate physical water supply. LBL:bsl cc: Sharon Stephenson Denis Hines Kathleen Harris Richard Cummins, Esq. Kenneth Greene James Mahan Kimberly Hazzard Mark Bean Don DeIord, Esq. P 200QteaerpMemos MAHAN.Coun '.1V.1 wpd Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. 8 'd 1L8 'ON 131831 '8 HAOMN3AV31 Wd60:17 OOOZ '5 'OA Iic.nrd::d al _ 7 3S' o'clock . Y �- �r,_. UM' 091981 4.444.,,e. QUIT CLAIM DEED TI -IIS 1)1?E(), Made tills 9th flay of October 1.1 86 . El.va L. CLAYCOMB and LINDA L. CLAYCOMB the 'Comity of Gar" fi E' 1 d and Slate of (. 1, r a, lo, grantor( 0, told JAMES P. MAHAN, ROBERTA KA; Z MAHAN and JEFFREY R. FITZSIMMONS .•! (,.i' il a,Ilrch,s Ii, 4779 117 Road Glenwood Spr;ngs, CO 81601 County of Garf i el d t:1.: 'wider. Bocx 696 mE7883 *FAD 91986 State Voc. l'ea L and State of Colorado. cran:ee(s), \1'I 1 \I',SSEI II, 1 hat rhe gl,intoas), f1;'' and in <:rnnside• atior, of the su!n of other good and valuable consideration and TEN-- ..-__-.___. . _ - ...__►)OI.i,A1. u,„ 1 rc•,pt ar;d sill tic itncy of which is herei_,yacl.nowtedped, ha VC remised, released, sold, conveyed and QUI I' C'I_AI'V4F'.1), and by El ,..•,,- I rescnt:.;. 1.10 1•1:11,1W, release. sell, convey and Qt.'1'IC'L,-\IM unto the grantec(s), thej r heirs, successors and ass; ns. '• 1,.1r...'r. all ih.` right. lite, ;,twist, claim Anel ,.+,-iii;;;x,i uh'ch 01,7 grantnr(s) ha VC' it; and 10 ihrt real nropctty, together with iI,+J,h rl.an; ni5. if any, ciltlate. lying being in t1'cCounty of Garfield nn.! Stals of i', 7i.,.-:1',.. «!. c;i':d to, f,rllows', The Davies Well located in the SWINE}, ()f Section 9, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M., at a point whence the West Quarter Corner of said Section 9 bears South 801'37'35' West 2912.28 feet.; claiming 0.033 cubic feet per second of time for doi,,,estic lawn and r,arden irrigation of not wore than one acre as approved by Ruling of Water P.eferee on January 12, 1976 aid by the Writer Judge on April; 26, 19)6. ,; . 1. 1,..Ii t:r ••!I,:1 : 1;..1 n;tnlhc :,. 4179 117 Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81661 e 111:A\ f ANI) lir Ili+I !)111.1.: s<Ints, l':�;,ctla;r vEitlr X1:1 :��I•: ;'i �1.r tFr:alillll'c`I,;,:,�•I:ri.a?,;''rc ti:;riur;'.'` .. I}r' 11 r.:. FI! ., a1 iw; rialn,; .1.1 al ilr' :, C ` I tc', r15 ",S - l.11ti lflf- r - i „',.', .',l a lr, l ,n..ci,' , r,i nt rf! 1 . rt Ir...,, �rr on;:, , hr ;Ind heilo.4 ai 111:.• I he grarltotr.' 1t the : +.cru!ci 1Li r, t,t ,, : ti,c (Gat. <=a 1,0n11 a;.1.1%.• • £1r,1(..r 1. Claycorrlb S iil'1l: i) Cl)i.OF• i)t 1. K. ,• l.1 r da L. C1 avco'i:h 1s; (.. •1tl!:ty 01 Gar i el d l 11„',rc)'. t1:) intil�.u�1Cr,li�tl.ntntlr..`- t;tlrci;t•.fr;r:n. ti, 1., 9th .i,r_ of 1.'. f.:l;fltsr I.. Clayccnb &nd `.melt.; L. Clayc,olrh. August 16 • 1. r I) 1 ' it'(:i1 :111:1' ')1,4, Nr..:. 1-85. &11 it rr AIM! i1t.rl, j Oc. t.obi'r I' Ri �4 R#:Cf:1V£'i) Fi O ANALY7tCAL RtP0i1I 5E.>'t' : 1:1'q -017'r`01.',1/1$'.4, faCf Data Ftec1lved _. 11:7, rr�•'r i? g 5k•`r��r)f �� tyr,• «._... r, ) j} ar 3 `• +. �` 'fir 1r)S1. • GI:l1WPt?d Sp;ing; Wastewater Facility l.aLmratory 401 W. 7th Glenwood Springs, Co $T601 Phone 0452256 r , 11.1,11-12 1 Wn 5r. f,"! • A( 117 • Sarripl 1?_ i tie i;',.. ! +LA:2414 - t, to Clete Fceport . 17C1 $3.-1.:z c 7 i tl i E''fY s,.yti �.- .. ,.,y• �. It err •SJATEME?fl 4i rS is ,Pt Y { t3 • "R (1)nu„; p e i l • SS 1 t. 'f !` , fa( f • y ' - 1';r°r,t t a� [7 fir;' t y ?i {r? 'ri, Citv' car , ±r1.e;r k�l yl 4-1-1-11P•1 •r,r, f ?; • 'MS f pEi . w,r[ show 1M1 Ihrvr ECAIerR C e mo wA 6 A Req PE, AND 14T ket. &lac c 'fNe m rNal 040/. Nit*/ ,� 6 Cyt "Ike- t rAD EWA) wAs DO flora- GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code", This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check list at time of application for a permit. 1 January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. l . Is a site plan in . , ed that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lin :, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the dist s to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or ater courses? Yes 3. Does the site pl indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 1 4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? 1/0 'Me 8ARA) kffi 5 V , L D Oy if lotar4 C 1, yeem e 0 �' Yes diAyAgog Tr/JGtIJ ee4l .)lr Res. 1 -111;4 4145 giE CAj;b4 3S gARtJ, MR dikyam8 40s0 A sfizocrou L94109x+2. 6e6 brivigt put--) 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of vent'( ent' ation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes WO (. 11.0j, 6pAc C 4VCo'i EM.tni&le 1NG. Aso' ST - s 7.7 N 6o/re 7_orl thi l Z4E 118 cue s -r- 411Y sr. 2 61615100oD RiN4Si Co 8(60/ .- &lstae �x . 5iitr p((of w,*TR .}iea of NR ailyeAsit 8 5 �perNG. 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's and soffits? Yes 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 p nds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wi oads? Yes 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction?, Yes V 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafj s or joists or trusses? Yes 10. Does the buildin section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columnsnd beams? Yes 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing gra contours? Yes 12. Does the plan include any stove or make and model and Colorado Pyr Yes No l/ �r6 clearance fireplace planned for installation including se II certifications or phase II EPA certification? 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace in uding a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code apter 37? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply wji th the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable room Yes No Y 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed gta§s panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petro um gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No 18. Do you underst d that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the bdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the , architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No I�0 �OMbs d3S�1�`rD� 20. Will this be the only residential structure osv lie parcel? ' J I toy ►1 be home. (cork ova "gm. {bwaw+ AS Yes No ✓ If no -Explain: vte -r- 21. Have two complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 22. Do you un stand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes No 23. Have you de ned or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio code requirements? Yes No 24. Does the pl ccurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 25. Do you underst d that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the appli ton of these changes? Yes No 4 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of ap lication and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Imp: " or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day b ore. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your ' spection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes t No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Cod including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy d occupancy of the building? Yes No 29. Are you aware that he person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", " eral Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project plying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access ' ermit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department sta ' g one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Phone: 'j, a 9 (days); Project Name: kt•te)d.LG r Project Address: ®K CR. Cay �o date 76; 03jc (evenings) 5 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Oficial prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 1/00 6 Nla /1 fs. 11+ 1 J O t r I O, y t N .= 8 1 i o 9 0 ISV 0 L w 3'" d � o op v' c cd H .0 c v., 0 h a? w �; c U 0a h r,r)o'4 0 71 6:4 3 � c IA NJ; Z County Road (Note the Road Number and Nam 1994 Building Cede Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the sides Snowload: 401bs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. /sq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches -30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowload-imposed by snow) GARFIELD COUNTY Building and Planning Notice of Clarification It is the interpretation of this department that the provisions of UBC Section 302.4, Exception Number 3, also applies to openings for access to attic space above a U occupancy. The access door in the ceiling of a garage must be self closing, tight fitting, solid wood door, 1-3/8ths inches thick, or have a 20 minute fire protection rating or the one hour fire separation wall between the garage and the dwelling must extend above the ceiling, all the way to the roof. 0/vL Arno Ehlers Chief Building Official 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/285-7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Lance D. AIIee,Architect 0024 Sunlight Drive Carbondale, CO. 81623 970-704-0676PH/FX 6/1/2000 Steve Hackett Garfield County Building & Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear Mr. Hackett, RECEIVED JUN 1 4 2000 I made a site visit on May 31, 2000 to the Mahan Residence at 0648 126 Road Garfield County, Colorado outside Glenwood Springs. Using the checklist you faxed to me, I reviewed the Residence and found it to be in substantial compliance with the 1994 UBC. The building was built originally by Elmer Claycomb, a registered Structural Engineer in Colorado. The roof rafters are 2x12's and the floor joists are 2x8's The building appears to be structurally sound and in good condition. Thank You, Lance D. AIIee, Architect CHARLES H. WILLMAN, P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW September 5, 2000 Steve Hackett Garfield County Building and Planning Dept. 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Hackett: RECEIVED SEP D 7 2001 Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Lance D. Atlee, Architect's, letter of June 1, 2000 which has his seal on it as you requested. I am not sure if he sent you a copy of this; therefore, I am providing the original of this to you for your records. Mr. Mahan will be back at the end of this week or early next week and will have the engineering report completed concerning the adequacy of the septic and leech field system. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, CHARLES H. WILLMAN, P.C. Charles H. Willman CHW/jh Enclosure xc: James Mahan, Jr. 811 Blake Avenue • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 e-mail: chwpc@juno.com • (970) 945 -8571 • FAX (970) 945-49B1 • 7-- INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILD ING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued. Zoned Area Permit No 9 1‘) AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIA ELY BECOME N LL AND VOID. Us D oma, +46Ck/44")* Address Leg Description 0 { s 1 4,0, ',tractor 0 CAW Kim Owner ll I This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD/ Footing Foundation Underground Plumbing Insulation Rough Plumbing Drywall Chimney & Vent Z Electric Final (by State Inspector) Gas Piping l Final /<pyne6(gAi An Electric Rough $y State Inspector) Septic Final 04,4b y:/wery i Framing (To include o f i n place and Windows and Doors ed). Notes: 1 ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. 38'4 -Mu THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE PhoneilMINIP 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD APPROVED Date d 1 ' By )161t4 IF PLACED OUTSIDE - CO WITH CLEAR PLASTIC 2