Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationSkeLch BlanPrelrmrnarYFinaI SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM SUBDIVISION NAME: P]NION qEAKS OWNER: CARBONDALE LAND DEVEI.OPMEII]T CORPORIION EN€qFISEsER/P LANN ER/eUerEseR : SCUII LOCATION: Section 2393 Township ZS Range 'YE PIan Plat WATER SOURCE; WELL SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD:ON SITE PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: 7],2 COU}TIY ROAD ExISTING ZONING: A/ilw EASEMENTS: UtiIitY I Di tch (2) TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: ( 1) nesl4Sr,! iel SingIe FamiY Duplex MuIti-famiIY I.4obiIe Home Commercial ( 3 ) rndusq1!1! (4\ PubIic,/Ouasi-PubIic : ( 5 ) oPen SPace,/Common Ar ea TOTAL: PARKING SPACES: Res idential Comme r c iaI Industrial Number 0 0 0 Floor Area Acr es 2L5+ Acres 0 2L* sq. ft. sq. ft. ,{ Scott Writer P.O. Box 9705 AslEn, CO 81612 Jarruarlr 9, I9E9 Board of County Conrnissioners Garfield Cor:nty Glerrwood Springs, Colorado 81601 REF: APPLICATION FOR SUBDilrISI0{ ''PIMION PEAI(S''-GARFTFTN COUI{IT, COI.ORADO C-errtlenen, This application for subdivision is sr:trnitted pursuant to the C.arfield County Subdivlsion Regnrlations, adopted and enacted April 23, L984. Tkre attached nat- erial is for Sketch Plan Ieve1 revisl. trrle request tlnt it be preselted at your regmlarly schedul-ec1 meetinq on Wednes- day feUru.ry A, t9B9 for your consideration according to paragraph 3:20 of the Garfield County SuMivision Regulations. Attached are checks for the reviernr fee. Sincerely, Carbondale Iand Deve!>Unent Corp. Scott writer President ftrclosr:res RStd/stx,'r TABLE OF COI\]'IEI{'IS SECTION TITt,E I II III V I,AP I-I l-2 r-3 t-4 r-5 E(lIBIT Preface G^rner and Subdivider Phys ical Ctnracteris Lics A. Access B. C,eology C. Soils D. Radiation Hazard E. Vegetation F. Drainage G. Wildlife Proposed Inprovorents A. Roads B. Water C. Sexuage D. Construction E. Utilities La.nd Use Breakdovrn TITI,E PAGE I 2 3 1 2 Regional and Vicinity uaps Iand Use Map Cologic and ft-rgineerinq Geology Map Vegetation Map Mjacent Gnmers Map TITLE Disclosure of G,unership General Investigation ald Percolation Tests, Lincoln DeVore Testing laboratory, Inc., dated l4ay 9 , L979 Application For Water Rights, dated Auqn:st 29, l9E0 and Application For Quadernnial Finding Of Reasonable Diligence, dated Augn:st 4, 19BB Garfield County Zoning Ordirnnce NNFc_ 5 7 PINICI.i PEAKS SKHTITI PIAN SI.]BIVIITIAL I. PREF'ACE The enclosed constitutes the Sketch PIan Sulnrittal for Pinion Peaks- pinion Peaks is a tract of land located nortLrsesterly of ttre intersection of County Road I03 and County Road 112. Ttre proposed subdivision consists of 18 single farnily lots averaging roughly 11.5 acres each. In 1979 there was an application for subdivisjon regrarding this orope.rty refer- red to then as "The Comcound". I4arry engineerincl firms were retained at that time by the ova-rer of the property, Carbondale Land Developnent Corporatiol,_ _to rurr-the appropriate stuails and tests reguired for subdivision Ly Garfield County. Because the proS:erty renairrs today as it was in 1979 (with one snal I exception) , I hrave takerr- the lilerty of including the Gerreral Investigation and Percolatj"on Tests by the Lincoln and OeVore festing Iaboratory dated }4ay 9 ,L979 (see Dd:rjJc- LX 2). Ttre one exception to its r:nchanged status is that 35 acres along tJ:Ie northern boundary has been sold. In the text of these studies please read "Ihe Conpound" as Pinion Peaks, and where there is a reference to over 2I5 acres bear in rnind 35 acres has been sold. Also, originally 1,1r. Ted Robinson of Surrdesigrrs was the planner in cLr,arge of putting "the Conpound" subdivision together. IrIr. Robinson is not involved, at tfris Lime,witt the Pinion Peaks suMivision, and where his nane appears that is in inforrnation regarding "fire Conpound". 1rkre following naterial is suhnitted as required by The Subdivision Regn:lations of Garfield -ounty adopted and enacted April 23, 19E4 by Section 4220, Sketch Plan Requirsnerrts. Scott Vfriter -1- III. Physical Ctraracteristics A. Access B<hibit 1 - Disclosure of G^mership j.dentifies County Road rights- of-way under E<hibit A (Iega1 description) and Ebd:j.bit e (orcept- ions, reservations, easefients, rights-of-way and encr-rnbrances) . B. C,eologic (tlaracteristics See B<LribLX 2 - General Investigation and Percolation Trests, dated May 9, 1979, and the related Map 1-3, Geology and Errgineering C,eo- logy Map, dated laay 4, 1979, pretrnred by Lincoln DeVore Testing Iab- oratory, Inc. C. Soils See ExLribLL 2 - General Investigrtion and Percolation TbsLs, dated May 9, L979, and related Map 1-3, Geology and E:gineerin_q Geology l,Iap, dated l4ay 4 , L979, prepared Lryr Lincoln DeVore Testing Labora- tor1r, Inc. D. P,adiation Hazard See D<Lrilcit 2 - Ceneral Investig.rtion arrd Percolation Tests, dated I4ay 9, L979, prepared by Lincoln DeVore Testing Laboratory, Inc. E. Vegetation See it4ap 1-4, Vegetation l4ap F. Drainage The subdivision occupies elevaterl nesa lands and has no najor exter- ior drainage areas contributing storm drainage flow to j.nterior drainage areas. No portion of the subdivision lies within a I00 year flood p1ain. c. Wildlife The southern exlrcsure of portions of the subdivision means that these areas are likely deer habitat as wj-nter range. In addition, there exists the nornal srnalI manrnal and bird populati.on. Thre design of thre prolrcsed subdivision will mitigate the irrpact to the deer population as follows: -3- IV. Pro[rcsed Inprovenents A. Roads (See Iand Use l4ap - It{ap I-5) Access for the subdivision sLra1l be off County Road 112. A11 roads, with the o<ception of approxi:nately 600 feet (along the northern boundaq,, of 1ot 3) are existing and all will be approved by the Countlz Road SuPervisor. Lots 7, B, 9, and 10 will be accessed via "Cains Iane" whrere gen- eral traffic w-i11 dead end at the southern nost junction of lots 9 and 10. Ftom this junction to the west the roughly 800 additional feet of road running to the corner of lots 11, 7 and 5 shal1 be im- proved to the width of 15 feet and maintained year round. The 800 feet of road sha11 be for errErgency use on1y, and not for general traffic. Iots 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and l-B sha11 be acces- sed via the "Cactus Flats Road". Lots I and 17 shal1 be directly accessed via Courrty Foad 112, Lot 17 from the existing driveraay to the Ha1eblain residence, and Lot 1 from a nsd driveaay. Water 1. Water Rights (See E<hrjJcit 3) Water rights, and Augrnentation plan, acquired and processed for "Itre Conpound" will be applied Lo "Pinion Peaks". 2. Donestic and fire control water will be supplied from a well systsn. B<act ntrnber and locations have not been identified at this Line. At tLris wriLing it j.s believed ttr,at final desigrn of the water distribution systern will depend on field location of wells andfield tesling of wel-1 capacities. Sewage On site septic disposal- is protrrcsed ix general conforrnance with the reconurerrdations outlined by Lincoln DeVore Testing Iabora- tory, Inc. , dated llay 9 , 1979 (See ExlejlciL 2). Some variation from these reconrrendations nray result because of the difference in nagrnitude between "Ttre Conqrcund" and "Pjnion Peaks". Construction B. C. D. -5- At this tjrre no definiLive construction specifacations have beendeterrnined. Road, water, and util j-t1z systens wil1 be anaylzed thor- oughly and will neet all Garfield Courrty Regulations. Firrancing of road, water arrd utilitlz systons are to be acconplished Through the use of construction ard long term loarrs in conpliancewith norrnal banJ<ing practJ-ces at the appropriate tines. Anticipa.ted Sor:rce of Utilities At this Lime preliminary crcnversations have been held wittr the fo11- owirrg firms, and their representatives, regrarding this issue: 1. ElectriciQr - Holy Cross Electric Association - Jeff Franl<e 2. Natural C,as - Roclqf r4ountain Natural Gas - Lee Hines 2. Telephone - US West Connrunications - Ray Carperrter -6- -i-+o+3 BABY BEAt.--, SUB:DIV 2393-tl4'OO-O23r.-,l'.i| ui.,,,::,r;;,,,1,, t+ 5l - t5- I za ro ++ ?393 T.7 S.- R. B8 W. 6A -bt I r2.81,S SE E\'M AN ADJACENT OWNERSHIP MAP MAP 1-5 PINION PEAKS 23^!oaoI ai3-l @ r28 ( .2393-ll4' Iv /l( Ref. # 230 083 260 190 234 235 2L7 067 069 066 AD]ACENT IANDCIO{RS Guner Weiss, I(athy D. 1609 Co. Rd. Ll-2 Carbondale, Co 81623 Sutey, John and Anthony 2343 Co. Rd. l'l2 Carbondale, @ 81623 Haleblain, Cherlrl Thomson and G. Ner^rton 2368 Co. Rd. LL2 Carbondale, C0 8L623 Provisor, Janis L. and Davis, Bradley O. 0525 Cactus Flats Rd. Carbondale, CO 8L623 Gamble, l[ia M. and Jorlz L. P.O. Box 3115 Grarrd Canyon, PC, 86023 Johnson, Ed,,rard and Janell L. 0055 Co. Rd. ll2 Carbondale, CO 8L623 Goodrich, John L. and Sar:ndra S. 2098 Co. Rd. l.L2 Carbondale, CIO 8L623 Hood, Davj-d C. and Nanq/ Nr:nnally 1001 }J,:rthwest 39th St. Oklahcrna City, OK 73I1E Fields, Janes and Jacqueline 2083 Co. Rd. LL2 Carbondale, C0 81623-9645 It{ansfield, }4icLr,ae1 L. P.O. Box 1273 Basalt, CO 81623 Hardin, Daniel E. and Carollm J. P.O. Box 2961 Glenvood, CO 81601 TYulove, Nlichael D. and Carol Iee 1268 Co. Rd. LLz Carbondale, @ 81623 068 16E 064 Ref. # 257 063 075 t79 tlp Cattle 002 008 010 003 ADIACE'J.I TANDCX^NrffiS Gnmef Larson, Karl G. and it4adeleine 201- N. I\,fi11 St. Suite 101 Aspen, CO 81611 Cain, Sharon L. and C,alen P. 1264 Co. Rd. l,l-2 Carbondale, CO 81623 Wirrston, Ion and Debra P. 305 Grayling Narberth, PA L9072 Ios Arnigos Ranch Partrrership 141 tr{est Jackson B1vd. Suite 1720 Chicago, 11 60604 Cree]< Subdivision- Adjacent Iandowners C1ose, David S. and Denise D. P.O. Box 765 Basalt, CO 8162I It4eans, Graore D. P.O. Box 4956 Aspen, CO 81612 lEad, Henrlr T. and Rr:chi1le 0073 Roclqr Rd. Carbondale, CO 81623 Hundley, Jonathan B. P.O. Box 5561 Sncxannass Vi11age, C0 Hanner, Paxton It{. c/o Reece l{anner P.O. Box 342 Kansa, IL 61933 and Krlzstal I. 816Is 009 Scott Writer P.O. Box 9705 Aspen, CO 8l-612 January 9, 1989 DIS0,OSURE OF CXIJIIEFiSIIrP I hereby certify as follows: I have ocamined certain title docu'trents relating to the lands descriJred in E<Lribit A including recorded jlforrnation, title clcnrruitnrents and files of the cor;rcration. . From such exarnination it is my opinion tlnt fee sirple title to the lands is vested in Carbondale Land Developrent Corporation (a Col-orado corlrcration), sr:bject to the eassrents, rights-of-way, restrictions, reservations and encurr brances set forth in sxhibit e. STAIE OF COI,ORADO SS. Subscrjjced and sworn before ne ttris li)y of Jamrarlr, I9B9 by Scott vlriter. Witrress my Lr,and and official seal COUNIIY Or L,, ,i , ( tarlz Publrc D{HIBIT I t4y conrnission expires::l:j] flnlniSril:l ir;;iti ['llli,:iy 10, ilj00 a EXIIIDI't'A A parcel of Land in Lot 7 and Lot l, tr2Nl{4 , l.I2NE4 ,7 South, Range 88 West of described as follows: and l-he Str4Sl.l4 of Section 11; and Nl.l4SE4 of Section L4, Township the 6th Principal Meridian, Beginning at t-he Northeast corrrer of the lJ2NEa of said Sechion L4i Lhetrcc Southerly alonq the East Iine of said W2NE4 of Section 14 to bhe Northeasl, corner of a parcel of Land conveyed to James A. Cain and Kay C. Cain by deed recorded August 7, 1969, in llook 403 at page 567 as Recep- t.ion No. 244053; Lhence along the boundaries of said parcel conveyed by deed recorded in Book 403 at page 567, North 40o00r00" West 56.49 feet, more or lessi 93.52 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 428.66 feet, the chord of which bears North 33o45'00" West 93.33 feet; 1L.24 feet atonq the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 14I.45 fecL, the cltord of which bears North 41oI4r52" East 70.56 feet; North 54o59r44" !'lest 96.34 feeE; 88.41 feet along the arc of a curve to the right l-ravinq a raclius of L97 .49 fcet, the chord of which bears Norl-h 42oI0 | 13" West 87.68 feet; I'lort.h 29o20'44" West 182.90 feet;75-20 feet along a 60-fool- road casemeltt and along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of.234.24 feet, the chord of which bears North 20o0B'55" t'Jest 74.88 feet; Nortlr 79"31'00" Wcst 498.05 feet more or less; South I0o40'03" I^lest 732.29 fect; and South 61'19'43" East 1I43.54 feet to Ehe East line of the NW4SE4 of said Section L4; 2. t-hence alonc; saj-d EasL Iine of Soutl'r 0I" I5'04" Uast to a point on the Nort.h line of a parcel of land conveyed to John G. O'Brien ancl llary E. O'Brien by deed recorded December B, L972 in Book 4 38 at page 4 55 as Recel>tiot1 No. 256309 i thence along saict Norbh line I'lorLh 42'I3'55" l'Jest 243.26 feet; NorLh 45o53'34" WesL 59.33 fceL, North 60oI4'24" West 80.67 feet, Nort[ 63o13'27" l{est I09.I0 fcet, Nort-tr 58o33'57" West 2g8.49 fcee, Nortlr 6$o00'4I" l\IcsL 179.06 feet, Nortlt 59oI7'50" Wcst I49.01 feet, Nortl't 52o56'45" l'lest 392.69 feet, Nortir 55o54'51" WesE 233.12 feet, North 48o07'03" l'Jest 935.04 feet, North 40"04'5L" l^lest 295.09 feet, and alonc-J the Southwesterly right of way of a County Roacl, North 42o30'15" West I29'95 feet ho ttte East line of a parcel of land conveyed to llomer E. Chapman by clecc1 rccorded n ugusL 25, 1971 in Ilook 422 aL page I30 as Reccpt.ion No. 250846; Thence along l-[e East, NorL[ apc] l^Jest bounclarics of said parcel conveyed by <1eed recorded in Book 422 ab page I30, North 00o03'30" i.lest 498.47 feet to the Northeast corocfr North 63o39,04"I,Iest 956.36 feet to tire Northwest corner, and South 00o03,30,'East to the sor.rth right of way line of the Count-y Roacl clescribecl in cieecl to Frank Sutey recorded SepEember LJ, t96:, in Book 353 aL pac;c 46 as Ilecel:tion No ' 2221 94; thencc along said south Iine, llorLh 5-7"02' west 179.I3 feet more or Icsi, l.lorth 36'48' l.Jest LBtl .2l fcet., North 6Io02' lJest 135.09 ieet, North BIoI9' tlest 202.07 feet, North 60o32' l^Jest 196.0I feet, and North 43o41 'I,Jest 158.47 feet; thence North 0003'30" i.lest 387.94 f eet to the Northwest corner of Lot I j-n said Section 14; I \i/' l. EXIIIBI'i'B Exceptions, reservations, eascments encumbrances affecting the subject 1. Rights of way for ditches: Dat.e Recorded ilook Page 3IO 5I , rights-of-way and property: Ilcc. No Land Patented 202L7 4June 30, I95B 2. 3. 5. Lot 7, Sec. 1I Lots I, 3, W2NE4, NE4NW4, Sec. 14 April 10, L924 LL2 ALA 86697 SEASWa, Sec. 1I Patent reservations in U.S. Patent recorded in Book 310 at Page 5I. Reservations of L/4 of all minerals in deed recorded in Book 353 at Page 41. (Present owner intends to reserve the balance of the minerals in alI subsequent conveyances.) Right of way for 40-foot County Road across Lot 1 and SE4NW4 of Section 14 as shown on map filed August 6, L926 as Reception No. 95884. Right- of way for a County Roacl, rs sl-town by Road Viewers Report filed February 16, )920 in Road Itecord I at Page 143 as Ileception No. 70022, and by plat f iled March 5, L920 in Road Plats I at. Page 75 as Reception No. 7024L. Right of way and easement for roadway access and utilities over and across. a strip of land in the SE4SI^14 of Section Il and the NE4Ni.l4 and SE4NI^14 of Section L4, Township 7 South, Range BB West, granted to John l,larshall Stirling by instrument recorded February 16, 1972, in Book 427 at Page 249 as Reception No. 252603, a copy of which is attached hereto. Easement to be grernt.ed under Installment Land Contract 1o- cated in Lot I, Section 14 on course to be described by subsequent survey. Rights of way referred to in legal description to the land. 7. B. WATER DIVISION NO. 5, COLORADODISTRICT COURT, Case No. SBCW APPLICATION FOR QUADRENNIAL FINDING OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE CONCERN ING CARBONDALE THE APPLICATION FOR WATER LAND DEVELOPMENT COI'IPANY, RIGHTS OF: in Garfield CountY 1. Name and address of APPIicant: Carbondale Land Development Company 840 South Adams Street Denver, CO 80209 Carbondale Land Development' Company c/o Leavenworth & Lochhead, P.C. P. O. Drawer 2030 Glenwood SPrings, CO 81602 2. Name of struct,ures: CLDC WelI Nos. 2 through 14. 3. Description of conditional water right's: A. DaEe of original decree: August 29, 1980' in Case No' ?9CW96, Watlr Division No. 5. In Case No. 84g:rfi259, Wat,er biuision No. 5, a decree for quadrennial f inding of ruu"onable diligence was awarded to t'he cLDc welI Nos. 2 through 14 on December 1I, 1984' Loca t ion: CLDC Well No. 2 i.s located in Ehe southwest L/4 of the southwesL L/4 af Section 11, Township 7 sor:th, Range BB West of t,he 6th P.t4., dt a point which bears N. 1l "00. 05n East a distance of L t2o0 feet from the SouthwesL Corner of said SecEion I1' CLDC WeIl No. 3 is located in the southeast L/4 of the iorin*"=t L/4 of Section 11, Township 7 South, Range BB west of the 6th P.1"1. , dt a point which bears N. 51o0I'1I. East a distance of 2,000 feet from the SouthwesL Corner of said Section 1l' CLDC WeIl No. 4 is located in the Northwest L/4 of the llorthwest l/4 of section L4, Township 7 south, Range BB west of the 6th P.l',1. , at a point which bears south 51o29'53" East a dist.ance br 580 feet from the Northwest corner of said Section 14' D D{JIBIT 2 CLDC Wel l No . 5 is located in the Nort.heast L/ 4 of the Northwest L/4 of Section 14, Township 7 South, Range BB West of the 6th P.l'1. , dt a point which bears South B6o53t46n East a distance of lrBB0 feet from the Northwest corner of said Section 14. CLDC WetI No. 6 is located in the Northwest I/4 of the Northeast L/4 of Section L4, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6t.h P.l'1. , dt a point wh j-ch bears South 87o53'37u East a distance of 4,200 feet from the Northwest corner of said Sect.ion 14. CLDC WelI No. 7 is located in the Northeast L/4 of the Northwest L/4 of Section L4, Townshlp 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.1"1., dt a point which bears South 50"35 ' 30n East a distance of 2,290 feet from the Northwest 'corner of said Sect ion 14. CLDC WelI No. B is locat.ed in the Southwest L/4 of the Northeast L/4 of Section 14, Township 7 South, Range BB West of t,he 6th P.1"1. r dt a poinE. which bears South 4Bo59t 02" West a distance of 3,540 feet from the Northeast corner of said Sect.ion 14. CLDC WelI No. 9 is Iocated in the southwest L/4 of the Southwest I/4 of Section L4, Township 7 South, Range BB West of the 6th P.t'l., aE a point which bears N. 9o18'03n East a distance of 1r030 feet from the Southwest corner of said SecLion I4. CLDC WelI No. 10 is located in the Southeast l/4 of the Southwest l/4 of Section 14, Township 7 South, Range BB West of the 6th P.l'1. , dt a point wh ich bears N. 64 o0 2t LL" East a distance of 2 ,BLO feet from the Southwest corner of said Section 14. CLDC WeII No. 11 is located in the southwest L/4 of Ehe Southeast L/4 of Section L4, Township 7 South, Range 88 west of the 6th P.M., dt a poinE which bears North B2o12tOg" East a distance of 3r530 feet from the Southwest corner of said Section 14. CLDC Well No. 12 is located in t.he southwest L/4 of the southwest L/4 of section 14, Township 7 South, Range BB West of the 6th P.M., dt a poinL which bears North B5o4 2t 23n East a distance of L,280 feet from the Southwest corner of said Section 14. CLDC WelI No. 13 is located in the Northwest L/4 of the Northeast L/4 of Section 23, Township 7 South, Range 88 west of the 6th P.l'1. , at a point which bears south 51 o05 , 4B " West a distance of ! ,920 feet from the Northeast corner of said Section 23. -2- 4. CLDC Well No. 14 is located in the souLheast L/4 of the Northwest l/4 of Section 23, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.1"1. , dt a point which bears South 48o56 t 53" West a distance of 3 r830 feet from t'he Northeast corner of said Section 23- c. source: water tributary to cat.tle creekr tributary to t,he Roaring Fork River. D. Appropriation DaLe: April 24, L979. Amount: 0 .0 44 c . f. s. , condi tional , for each weII. E. Uses: Domestic, irrigation piscatorial, and fish and wildtife propagation purposes. F. Depth: N/e. Activities and expenditures during the relevant diligence period: The CLDC Well Nos.2 through L4, inclusive, are part of an integrated water supply plan decreed in Case No. 79CW97. During t,he relevant diligence period, the Applicant has been involved in the sale, conveyance and leasing of water rights decreed in Case No.79CW9i, as water in excess of adjudi- cated augmentation water needs for which these wells are points of diversion, and other consult.ing efforts designed Lo provide a legal water supply and distribution system for residential development. The Applicant. has expended money to promote the developmenE and sale of the property to be served by t.hese condi tional water rights but adverse econo- mic conditions have prevented significant development. During the relevant diligence the Applicant has direcEly and indirectty paid attorneys fees incurred in connection with the sale of such excess water and has paid aII Park Ditch and Reservoir Company assessments totaling approximately $800. OO applicable to tf,e f ive shares of stock in said Dit,ch Company underlying the augmentation pIan. During the diligence period the Applicant has expended money for legal fees to protect ifs conditional water rights. -3- STATE OF COLORADO County of SS. T, Loyal E. Leavenworth, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that he has read the foregoing APPLICATION FOR QUADRENNIAL FINDING OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE, knows the contents thereof, and that the same are true to the best. of his infor- mation, knowledge and belief. and 1988. sworn to before WIINESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: lv,*!rL.tL/--'-- me this & day of My C-ollarkrim ExPire hlov' 8, l9B8 elan. Notary -5- ) ) ) I l<t-u'tli\rIlJ I II.I TIIII DISTRICT COI]It'I II.i ANI) rOR I.IATEN DIVISION }IO. 5 STATE OT COLOIIAI)O Application ).lo . 79c\,t97 IN TIIE I'IA'ITDR OF TIIC APPT,ICA'I'ION ITOR i^]ATIiII RTCIITS OIT C.AiTL.IOI'IDIrLIJ LAND T)L]VELOPMtiNT CORPOIlATI OI'I rN TIIIj ITOARIIlG ITOITK ItIViJIT OR TTS ']'RIBUTARIES TRIBUTARY II.IVOLVED: CA,-TTLE CREEI( IN GARFTELD COI.]NTY lltl_hl N c_-_o1 : _!!l.lLQl_l:r i: The above entitled application v/as filed on A;rril 30, i-979, @t an addendum was filed on May 14, 1979, anr.l r,rere refer:recl tct Lhe undersigned as Werter Ref eree f or Water Di.vis j on l.Jo. 5, S L-at-e: of Colorado, by the flater Juclge of said Court- on t:he J.Bt-h cliry of l4ay, 1979, in accordgqce ruith Article 92 of Chapter 37, Col-orado Itevisecl Statutes 1973, known as the !.Jater Ilight Determination Act of 1969. And the undersigned Referee h.rvl-ng macle srrclt investiclat-ions as are necessary to cletermine vrhet.her or not t.hrt stat_ernent-:; j-n Lhe application are true and having become fulIy ad.rised r.zith respect to the subject matter of the application cioes hcrel:y ma}:e the foll.orvirrg deternrination and ruling as the Referee in t:his rn;rtter, Lo-wit: 1. The statoment-s in the appl.ication itre tr:uc. 2. The names of the st.ructures involvecl are: ? Deve lopmen t Cope, P, C. (a) Clark l^lell- No. l, ad'juclicated by tlris Ccurt in Case No. 19C\'i67; (b) Morris Irlell No. 1, adjudicated by Lhis Court in c.rse lrlo. 79CI,l6B;(c) Il/K Ile11 No. l, ad jtrclic.rLecl by this Cour:t in Case No. 7 9CIV6 6; and(d) CLDC IVcll l.lo. I through CLDC h'c1I lto. 14, ad judi- cated by Llris Cortrt j.n Case No. 79CI.J96. The name of tlre claimant and address is Carlronclale Lanrl. Corporati.on; c/o trlusick, I'Ii 11iamson, Schrrrartz, l,eavenworth & , P. O. Drah'er 2030, G1r:nrvr>od S1:rings, CC) U.1.601.. The source of the vrater j.s from rvells tributar:y to Cattle Creektrj-butary to tl-rc Roarinq Por-]: It.ivcr. 5. The 1ega.l dcscripLictns oli t-hr: .locat iorrr; r>f tltc r.,'cl_I:; areas f ollor.rs: (a) CIarI: l'ie11 lio. l- j.:;.l or-'aLcrl irr 1-lrc llllrillllr,; of Ijr-.ct:ion 17, T.7l;., Il .B'/lJ. r>f l_lrt: 6tlr I,.I,l . irt a point_ 2ir0 foot-- I,l;rst f\<r I n ,.rn,O.tt.C,ati"D:i-t.L^J riF,$, t._EDIN \ViYt'jiti ( jOUR,I. l)iviiurr No. 5 .t'. r . .; it.t l3il0 STATE OF COLOI?ADO of tlte I{es t line of s;rid r :: ' li.rre and 2 ,310 f r-.ct: South of the NorthSc.:ction 17. (b) t4orris wcll No. l is locatcrl in the slilswk of section 11,T.7s-, Il .B7tv. of thc 6t-rr I).1"r. .L a 1-roinL 660 foeL NorLhof the Sorrth line antl 2,062 fcot Iiai;t- of tlre t^/c.::;t lineof s;r icl Slec tion 1I. (c) M,/K Itanch t.IcII l.to. I is lo<:aLctI in the IJUril,llik ofScction 17, T.7S., It.B7t.t. of the 6th p.14. aL a 1:oint 300 f eet South oI t-lre IJor t_h 1ine irncl l. ,4OOfcct EasL of the I.JcsL Line of saicl SecLiorr l_7. (d) CLDC Well No. 2 is loc;rtecl in the St'IlSWk ofSection 11, T.7S., R.Bjit,t. of the 6th p.l"t. at apoint which bears I,l .11u00,05', L. a <listance of1r200 feet frorn the Soutlrlest corner: of saidSection 11. (e) CLDC I'1e11 No. 3 is Locai-ccl in the sLlswk ofSection 11, T.75., R.But,,,. of i_he 6th p.I!. .rt a. point r.rhich bears N. 5loOl '.1_1.,, l:t . a distar]cc of2,00_0_ fcet- frorn the Southr.rest Cor.-ner of saidSectiS-n 11. (f ) CLDC tJell No. 4 is toctrt-cd i n t.he l,JtVt:il.tlJra ofSectj.on 14, 't.JS., R.B{lt{. of t:}r<: 6L}r l,,t.l . ;rta poi.nt which bcrars S.li 1.o29,53" [. a clist-arnce of580 feet from tlre lrort.lrr..'cst- c<>rncr.f srrid scctiorr 14. (cJ) CLDC I,]el1 No. 5 is locir t-ccl in the lJitltNlrtk ofSection 14, T.15., R.B,iit. of Lhe 6Lh p.It. ut apoint- r.rlrich bears S. B6oSlr46,, I.l . a clisLance of1,880 fect from the l,lorLlxvest Corner: of s;ri.dScction 14. (h) CLDC I'tel" I No. 6 is Iocc tcd in the Nw%NIil., ofSection 14, ,t'.75., n.gBI,J. of ilrc 6tr)r f .Ll . at apoint. ruhich l:ears S. B 7053 r 37,' tj. a rf ist;rnce of4,200 feet from the Northwest Corner of sai<1Section 14. (i) CLDC I{eI1 tJo. 7 isSection 14, T.7S. ,poinl- rvl.rich br:ars S2,290 fcel- frorn il.rcSection 14 - located in the IrlIt!:;tJt.lt; ofIr.B!ll. of tlrc 6Llr t,.H. at a.50"1it.l0" ).:. a tlist:zrncc'of lJ()r. ttlx./e..it Corrrer oI saicl :!:" ( j ) CLDC tve1l lio. B is locar.erl in the swkil[!; ofSect..ion 14, T.75. , p.. UilH. oF the 6tl) I,.M. at apoinL. lvhj.ch bears S.48"59'02,' 1,. a rlj-stance of3,540 feet from the Norl_hcasL Corrrer of s;rirlSection 14. (k) CLDC I'te11 No. 9 is locat-ed in the Sl.tr:iSt^tk ofSection 14, T.75., R.BB\.1 . of thc 6tli I,.l,l . at apoint r,rhj.ch ]:ears I.t.9oI8'03,, I; . ei rlistance of1,030 f ceL f ronr ttre SouLltv/est. Corncr of :;aiclSection 14. (1) CLDC l'jc11 No. 10 isScctir>n 14, f.7S.,a point t.rhich l;ears2,810 fecl- from thcSection 14. Locute<l in tlre I;tikSI.jt ofR.3Bi{. of t:Jtc 6t}r p.}l . at I,l .64o02rlI', F- t.r clisLance .Sor.rthr,rest Cor:ner oF sairl oll (m) CLDC tle11 No. 1t is locatecl in the SI.tt;SItt ofSection l-4, T.7S., Il .BBt{. of t_hr: 6Llr 1,.M. aLa point vrhich bears I,l . B2ol.2 , 09,Ea distarrce of 3r 530 feet from the Southr.rest. Co'r:neir of saldSection 14. (n) CLDC Welt No. 12 is locat.eri in thc St.JkSI,tk ofSection 14, T.75., n.BBtV^ ot. thc 6tlr It.M. ata point which beras il.85u4?.,23" E. a distance1r280 feeL. Irorn Lhe SorrL.hwc:sL. Cor:ner of :;aiclSection 14. ffrt'!.i ': ]ocatcd in the tJI,tkNEk ofR.Btivi. of the 6th p.1"1 . ats.51o05r48" hJ. a clistanceNortheast Corner of said ]ocated i n the gtrl;NIV| of R. ti8t\t. of the 6th p .It. atS.4uo56'53,' w. a clisLance the tlor:the.est Corner of ::: ir: of of (o) CLDC l',ell, No. 13 isSection 23, T.75.,a point ruhich bcars1,920 fcet frorn theSection 23. (p) CLDC Well No. 14 isSection 23, T.7S. ,a poirrt vrhich bears of 3,830 fcet fronrsaicl Section 23. 6- This is arl .application for approvc-rI of a Plan for Augrnentationand Change of I'iater Riclttrs for the purposc of pr:ovirling rv;1ter t6 s;rtisfysenior vrater righl-s when ttre above-clcscribccl vrr:.1 I r; arr.: prc:rlucing outof priority. ?- statements of opposition rvere timely filec1 by Union oi.rCompany of Calj.fornia and by the Coloraclo llivt.:r l./,-r ter ConservationDisbrict, and as a r.:slrl.t, on JtrIy 31, lg'lg, the Applicai-ion vrtrsre-referrecl by the !J.rter I?eseree to l-hc iiaLer JudgL- for: I.l.rter Divis.ionNo. 5. 8. On October 2, I979, the Stal_enrent of Oppcrsition of theco.!-orado River l^later conservation Distric t r'ras vri thclr:arvn , 9. On August 21, L979, an Dntry of Appearance !./as fi. Ie<1 l:y LhePark Ditch Company, Davicl Sl-roock and Jolrr.r SuLey. 10. On January 29, 1980, the Applicant. ancl t)anieI Stroock,John Sutey, and the Prrr:k Ditcll Conrl>any ti Icil a st..i I)ul.rt-i()n cont:;rini.nqthe foll-owing pertinent provisions: 'A, Stroock, Sutey, and Par): ;rqrccr to r.ri Lhc'lr:rrv thei rappearance in C;rsc tlo. 79C1.197, .rn(l t,o pt:rnri t tlrc: u:;r: of 5shares out of thc B sirarcs c)ttned )ry llrr: a1:lpI.i<;ant- Ln Lhe rnannerproposed by thc-- plan f or augrnen LaL ion . l)ark f ur l_lrcr: agreesinrmediately to mnrl:e aI1 ncccs:;.rly entries; <>n i. t_s corltoratcbooiis and recor:cls to recogniz^ .r;rp1ic;rnt_ ;r:; t'_hc-, orvrror ofB shares of tltc cap.it-aI stocl.. of. L,.rrl:. B. Applicant aqrees, on beh.elf of it_self, its.successorsand assigns, to pcrmit Park to c;{erci:;c sol e ;rcllni.nistrirLirre r:ontrolover the derirzery oI water to Plr:]l or to the Divis;ion Iirlginssr,l{ater Division I.lt. 5 , pursuant to saitl plan f or au<;rncrntaf-ir>n ,and to pay Lo P;rrli any costs of :rdrn j r:is L-r;rt.irrn irrr:prrecl by i,arkby v.irtue of saicl plan for augmenl-irLion, .nppticarrt: a]..;o airreesto continue to pay the normal as!icssnr,'rrts I i:vir.'<l antrually byparJ< f or the r.rsr-ra1 operation and rrrain Lcn:rnr:c of par l:'s iiri.J:rtionsystem. Applicant aqr:ees that irr t lre crrcnL it shoulrl f ail wj-thj.nsixty (60) d.r1,5 1o rcnrit to l';rrli c-rr)! osl:ir-trisrrrcnt-s or otlrercharges propcrly as:;essed to appli(:ant, I,;rr-1.. slt:r1l pr:ovicicnotice of such fai. lure to app1.ie,.rrrt- an<.I l o t-lrc D j vi i; j.on l.ingineer, - 1-- and tllat if such amounts are not p.ei<1 or otherrvisr-.r r:esolvecl' within trinety (90) clays fo11or'ring such noLice thc Divisionr:ngincer may tlrcrcaf ter administer tlre r.,,c.l.l.s as if tlre pJ anfor augmentation clid not exist, urrtil suclr amounts have beenpaid or other:rv i se resolved. park acJrees to adrni pir;t.r:r- theshares or'rnccl by appJ.i.cant- j.n acc()rdirnce vlith t,he r:eclrrirernentsof said i:Ian for augrnenLation as djrcctcil )ry Ltre Div.isionIjngineer. ,C. In orcler to enable park t-c; .seek alrpropriate a'clnecessary approvals of ilre l,Jater Cour:t-, I{at-er tlivisionNo' 5, to pernrit the use of ar1 r.ratr:r rights orvnecl byPark for domestic uses as rvell as t.he exist_i".g acyricilturaluses, applicant agrces to pzry tlre cost of ;rn 6ngineering - *(.study to bc perf ormecl by tveslern Dnc;ineers, Tnc. , in ,-.--^0-.t .'-^accordance with the proposal attactrec.l here|o as Exhibi t A.(ryflcH!"oupon receipt of the r:esults of sai<l study, I)ark ac;rces l_o \/a)TtPuttol,t institute appropria.e proecc<1-ings in saii co,rt; a,plicant:agrees to support such application rvhcn filecJ 11. The Applicanr- ancr union oi1 Cornpany.f cariforniar havereached an agreer{rent in the for:m oI a propt.rse:,1-consc6t trccrge, 11rr:pertinent parts of whi.ch have br:cn i,,.L.pi,, ..,t cd'-in l-]ri:; jtrrl.irrrl 6[Referee. 6.?:.,r 15. On the basis of year-rouncl occuJ).rncy by 3,5lot (252 persons), each uti"lzing 90 gtrllons'of ivaLer perdiversion recllrirement- form the welrs involverl hercin f orwill be approximateJy 25.40 a crc-feet. " 12 ' As a result of the StipuIaLi.orr and tlr<: nroposcrl Cons;entDecree r.rhich have been filed in trris naLtcr, on nlrrir )2, 19g0, theApplicatiorl w.ts aqaj.n referrccl to tlrc l{atrr:r Iir--[c.rcc iry t-5e h]aLorJr-rcl<;e for lrlai-er Divisi.on N(). 5. 13 ' Carbonr'lale L.etrd Developrncnt Corpor:aLrorr is r:rrryaqerl inthe clevelopmenE of appr:o:<j.mat_e1y sixty_ninc (Cli fots Ior s;i.nqle_f amily residential develoPnr,.--nt lo bc loc;rtccl on Dr()perty 6r,rrrr:c1 lryCLDC situatecl on f our ( 4 ) Lracts; of Iand n,,"o,,,pn-u"iit,; airrrrcrxinra Uety476 acres, m()re or ress, rocat--ccr i' ;rarts of sactiorrr, 1'l I r4 , ancl23, Township 7 Sout.h, Itanqe Bfl t{est of t)re 6t.}r I,.11 . (l.rcrcirraitcr:ref erred to as "clDC. Property" ) . GLDC ha:; also cntr:red j-nl-o a(Jreelnentswith others for the inclusion in this plan of an aclcliL.ional three (3)single-f anrily residences to be locatecl on properl-y or.lrcci by them anclsitu.rted within section -1 '/, Township 7 souilr, ^ Illnr;e tJ7 t^Jt::;t of t-he6th P.l'1. (hereinafter refcrrccl to ai "AgrccmonL I,iopertier,;',). .rlrrrs, a total of no mole thln scvenbl/-trro (72i sinr.;re-fanlr.y rcsicrenccs rsi11be included rvithin this pI;rn for: augrnent:ation. 14- Applicant proposed to ut.ilize a total of sixteen (16) we1lsto supply \^rater to the 72 lots. I'hirteen rvclls will scrvice 69 of ilrelots through a central- r.,'atr.rr systcm; t-hc rcrmainingl 3 r,rcl l:; vr.i. 1.;. i;ec1c'mestj-c rvcfls loc.rLecl tt1r,;n an,*'l servicirrcy jn<livirlua,l .l.ot.s. ,1,hr: weIlsinvolved herein are as; clr:scribecl in ))aragr;rpl: 2 al.rovc, ;rt- tle locat.ionsas clescribed in paragraph 5 aLove. persons per c1ay, the annualin-house uses l-6. The waste r,/ater generated f rom Lrre .r.or-.s ruif 1 be rlisposeclof through indiviclual sel.itic tank arrcl rr:irchf j.crlrl clisposar sys;ter,s clc-signed to minimizc evapotr.rnspiration. r,rre "",r.,rrptivc qse c_rf rva Ler:rtsed for in-house purposes is estilnated t" a; lrl c.,f l-he arnount cl iverLeclor a maxj-ntum of 3-05 acr:cfeet per year, l,rre renra j_ndcr oi. Lrrc waterdiverted throuc;h the r.,'ells for'in-horrs€) prrr:po:;.,(; \,./,. I1 bc rct:urne<lto the CatLl-c Creck r,r;rt.ershccl . Of tlre 3. 0,i trr.:r.c_f cct l;t> (:or)sllrn(:(l ,1.52 acre-feet r.ri11 be co,:;rrnred cruri'c1 t_Il; p,,;].;d Nay r-rrrouqrr october,when the Park Ditcrr Irirs l.risLorically been r.ri;<:ci for: ir.::iq.ti.on arcithe vre1ls 'rre not expectccl t:o be pe-'inritLorr to r1 i.vcrt. r.r.rLcr uncrer: il-rejrorvn- clecrecd prioritics. ,t'l-re remai.irilrt l.5J ;r<;rell.,-.ct r+i I .1. l>e cr)'sumc(lduring the perioct Novcnrbe,, ti,i"iiqii -nr,ri i;-";;;; 't_l',,, ,rol ts aro elir)(,rct-L,(tto l.)e per:mittecl Lo <1 i rrcr-t-. water: irnclci tlrcir orvn <lc(:rcr,)cl prior:iL j.cs. "', o t:...i,,. ' 17. Applicant sha1l adopt restrjctive covenants and deedrestrictions binding up()n subsequent pu)-c:hirs;crs ancl currcnL owl)ct:sfor each 1ot or parcel involved herein vrhich wilL limit tlre useof water from the we1Is as forlows: three (3) 1ots, ttre AgreementProperty, shall be permiLted to jrrig;rtc no more than 2,500 scilrarefeet of lawn and gardens each; tEE-emel;ing 69 cJ,I)c lots sharl bepermitted to irrigate no more than 1,000 square-feet of larvns andgardens per 1ot. There wi1I, thus be a total of 1.76 acres ofirrigated lawn and garden area with a cliversion requirerncnt of5.21 acre-feet and a consumptive use of 3.5.L acre-feet, annua11y.I'his 3.51 acre-feet of consumption will occur clu::inq the perioclIllay through october, vrllcn the Park Dit-ch rvat-er rights have his-torically been used for irrigation and the vrr-'f .ls are n()L expect ed tobe permit.tcd to d j-ver t v/ahor uncler thcir own <le<.:reecl prior.it j.es. 18. Applicant further proposes to perrnit residents of 39 1ots1only to maintain no more than two (2) hcrrscs per: Jot; no other livestoc)</..sharl be permittecl . Rased upon 11 q;rlon.s oi-wErerler day each, l^assuming 100t conslrmpt--ion, tlrere rnrilI be ar-r adclitior-r;r1 0.96 .cre-feet Jof rvater consumed each ycar. Of thi s, 0. 4 i] acrc-f eeL rv j 1 1 occrrr rlgr:i.ngthe historic irrigation season anC 0.48 acr:c-feet cltrrinq t[e l.ristor:icnon-irrigation season. 19. The total consumption of \,/at:{rr a!; a resu.l t of Applicant'sdevelopment artd the Lhree (3) aclditional 1ot :; in<:lrrclr:r-l \/ii-lri;t t )r j:; plan is, thereEore, expected to be as fo11o',r:;: Fi+\. \nd+5 In-house Irrigation Equestrian Total. !Bv_:9s_9_ 1.52 51/- lB_ 5l lJo_v-A1rr 1 .53 0 --q-r-lq 2.01 a -9 ,. J. !9!ql, 3.05 3. s]. - 0..9! 7 .52 tract h.ist.or:ica11y as lrcj.nrl in Il.ur(je BB ues; L. 20. Applicant is the otvner of , and shall cause l-o be corrunitteclfor augmentation purposes hereunder, five (5) shares of ttre ca1>italstock of the Park Ditch and Reservoir crornpany. IIistoricaJ. ly, eachshare of stock has entitlerl the ol./ner to an anrlual avcrage yicld ofapproximately 2.4 acre-feet of water in storagc in tlie ConsolidateclReservoir and 3I.44 acre-feet of water urrr.lcr t-he cli-r'ccL florv rv;rterrights adjudicated to ti're Park Ditch. 2L. Applicantrs 5 shares of stock in l-he park Ditch havehistorically been usecl to ir:rigaLe approxirnaLell, t.lrirty-trvo (32)acres of alfalfa and native hay meaclorv. (lncler iirig:rtion pr:acticestypical of the area, the average consumptivc usc pcr acrc lras been1.5 acre-feet per year, or a t-otal of 4B acre-feet for the Appl.icant'sfive (5) shares. 22. The locaLion of the thirty-t.l./o (32) .rcreirrigated as set f<>rtlr above is clenerally des<_.ri.lrecithe Sout-tr IIal.f (S!) of ticcCion 14, Tovrnsirip 7 fiorr [.1r,of thc 6 th P .I'1 . 23. This Plan foq-_A\rC.Tgntation rviIl nrake 4B acr:e-feet of v/atcravailable td eaEEle.creet< eacE'-ve.aF-to r:epiEce-rlegileEions fionr-tlierve11s, thereby permitt.i.ng .a.pplicant to divert- t-hrorrglr tIe r.re11s cllringperiods when the we1ls coulcl not .legarly divcrt rrnclcr t.heir ovrndecreed 1,rior j.ties, rvi thorrt causinr] in jtrry Lc.r ot:her vral-cr r j <15ts.AppricanL vrill- consurnptively use a maxirnurn of -5.5r ac.e-f eet ofwater per year throuqii s.rid wells clurinq the f&iEr f.l;ry t.hroughOctober, when the we11s are expectecl to be trnz-rblc t-o tl ivcr:t- w;rterunder their own decreccl 1r;-i.91-ities, 'I'lrerc: Iorr':, 42.41) ac:r<:.-..1]r:et- ol' -99.nsumPtive us_e__per:-yg.crr-. rvi, I j bc ava i'I,rlr'l c t,o t)iri-71'p).i.c;rnL lry vi.rt-rreof the_! shares for ac.lclitional-tise. t) / -5- :.: , ,,nrr.Al:.: l L 24. The operationaL schedule of this plan for augmentationshall be as foll-orvs: (a) I'later re<luired for auclmcrrt-aLio' pr.lllpos.s herennclr:rwill be divel:ted ttrrolrr-;h the I).rr.-): l)i l:r;)1 j r, ,.,,_-i,-rrdanr:c vrj t.lrthe provisj.ons hereitr. - (bl . During the months Novenber throu<1lr Apr:i1, irrclusive,the Applicanh- is .:xpected to be errr.i r.l r:rl l:o cliicr t suf f i cir:nt-quantities of \,r.rt-er trntlcr tlrc rvcl. 1s ' or,lr ,l 979 1.,'at.er ritlhts,and augrnentation of such diversio.rs shalr not be requiic<i. ,. (c) During the months l{ay through October, i.clusive,Applicant sharl cause to be releasc,cl lhrorr<;tr the I)ar-k Dit-ch5.5r acre-feet of rvater, 3.39 acrc-feet duri,g Lhe nonLhs ofIuay, June, and July by virtue of the AppJ icanL's i nter:esL inthe. vratcr r j.ghLs dccrced to Ll)e I,ar-l: DiLc:h, and 2. r2 ;rcre-f cetduring the morrths of August, .seI)ternber, ;rncl october by virLueof Applicant's inter:est in thc rr;rl_r:r ri<;lrL ilccreeil t_o tlieConsoLidated I{eservoir, throuqh iln irucrmcntat:ion station to beconstruct,ed by Appl-icant lvitir ure approvar of the DivisionEngineer and Objcctor Union OiJ- Cornp.rny, to be operit-t:d l;,ythe Park Ditch conrpany. said releases shal.r be mar<le at sucl-rtimes ancl in such arnrtrrnts ;rs .rre <l ircc tctl by t.he, I)ivi:;ionIingineer. (d) Applicant shall perm.r..r)t1y rem.ve from irrir;ationthe 32 acrosr o I land h j.sl-orir-.a l l1, irr:i11;rt:r_,11 5, LIre 5 :;lrar:c::; ofPark Ditch stock. 25- The Park DiLch ival-er righls may be changecl fr:om irrigrrti.onuse purposes to domesLic, irrigation, au(rrnentation, exchanc;e, anrJ a,1 J-other beneficial purposes for use herein vrit-hout injuric>ur;iy errlecL.incyany ohrller of or person entiLled l-o trsr-. versl:c<l r.tater r:-irtlrt-s or clecreedconditional water rights 26. If the Plan for Augmcntation .is olicratccl arrd ailministereclin accorclance rvitl.r Lhe ;rbovc-clct;rilecl Ccscripii on, it r.r j..1. I huve t.hcef f ect of replacing rv.etar in CattIe (l.rccl-. ancl i t-:; suc:cos!;or streilntsaL the time ancl place atrrl in Lhe arnounts ol'Lltc rlelr.l.crtiotl; causr:<lby the dcvelopnrent's ttsc of tr;rt-or. As a r:csu1t-, tht rrnclcrrr;r'<-ru1cl r/.rterto l:g diverted by the r.re11s set .[ort-lr in I).rrlrJr:ap]r ).4, ;r]rovc, r.rhiclr tvou Id otherwise be cons j.clered ;rs f rr 1 Iy appropi'i ;r i,cd a nrl unava i. l.abl c:for usc, rriIl nor.r be irv.ril;rblc f or ;rlrprolrri.irL-iorr r.r j,t:lrorrL ;r<lvcrsc Lyaffecting any owner of .r: pLrrrion c-ntitlr:rl to r::;o vcsr.r:rr r./nter r-i<;htsor condiL.ionally decreecl v/,rt-er rights on C,1 Ltlc Crcek, j.t-s; t.ribu[;rriesor successor streatns. 27 . A11 current anrl sLlbsequcnt pr.rrclrascrs ol' CLDC anc'l AqreementProperty as hereinabove d<:scriber.l viII lrr: lrorrrrrl b1, Lhc tcrms ol: thr:clccree in this rnatter, anrl t:he decreo shal--l l>c f j l.cr.l of r-ccorcl j,rr Garf ield County ancl t: herel-ry cons Li but-e a c.)vcrr)ant r:unnin<y rv j L-.h tlreIand. The deed restrictions and res;Lrjcl.i.ve covcn.rnts runni.ng vri. l_hthe property involvecl hcreitr s;ha11 a.l..lor.r tlre rrse of watr.lr,r.li.y otset forth in this plan for augnlenta t-iorr ancl slral I pr6iril>iL a'l 1 otheruses. 28. 'IIle Referec fjncls that t:he ilnposit.ion ol thc corr<l itionsset forth herein, wc.[1s l-or: the descri l;e<l 1:lrrposr_.s only m;ry be con-structecl atlcl utilizc:cl vrithor.rt ac.lverscly aftccLirrry arry ve-stect r.raLerrights or dccreecl condi tional rvater rights on caItt.-r- Crec]:, itstributaries, or succcssor: s treams , ancl t:lra L , by the j ns; t-i. t-ut- j.onof the plan for;rrl(lln(,nt;tLj.r>n itncl clritrrr;c r>l- lvltirr rirllrt.:; lrr:re.i rrarpSrrovecl , , (cljl)c, o\../ncrs of t-lre n grcelnolrt I,rr)p(.r-t_y, i_Ir,.-.ir ptrrchasers,stlcccssors or .rssigns; Inay tiectlre pr:rt,.ti t5 f or rr;rr irnrl suclr rvcl I s r:roLhcr structuros r.rith.trt- :rrivcrscrv ;rll't'r:ti.nr1 ;rrry r.,r.rstcd ,,.,;rt:cr righL.sotr Cattle Creek, its t-t.'i.brtt.ar.icrr; ()r:;uccr-':;si()r l;l.r-<:.rrrs anrl r.li.t.-horrt the -t,- ). .. necessity of administcrinq or curtailinq the withdrawar of watertheref rom, so lonq as the conclitior.rs outline<l hercin lrre met. r t--is specifically found tlrat, l_his pltrn fr.lr augrnent;rtion, l-ras;ecl uponthe average historic consttmpti.ve use of 4B ;tcre-fer:t frorn the liveshares of Park Ditch-company stock rvhich j.s the subject. hereof, willprevent injury to othr:r vratcr riqhts as a r.cslllt of the diversionsof ruat.er to supply L.]-re 7 2 l.ots , horvcver no p1;rn f or ag<1mr:nLationfor othcr properties or structures uLilizing the 42.44 acre-feet:of excess hj-storic consumptive use is cltrt.erij-ncd or rlecrer:d Sereby. ' 29. The plan for augrnentation and change of r.ratcr riqhts :;etforth herein is one contenrplated by 1avr. Thc Afipricant is .r.,ii1le,lto a decree approving thc Plan for Au(,'mentation- antl Ohange of l,laL.erIl,j-ghts set forth abover. 30. The change of water rights ancl operatiop of the plan forAugmentation involvecl her:ein will caus;e r,.,opir.op.iirtec1 r.rirLcr to beavailable for the Appl.icanL tt> cliver:t throu'gir lirc watc.r r-i<yhts t9 bcaugmented as set forth hcreinabove; the av;rilabil.it-y of unapl)ropriatedwater to the stream rvi-11 per:rnit <liversr ons tlrrougli .saj.rl striri,tr.riosrvithout injuriousJv arfccting orvners r>f or pcrsons enL-itrled to rrsewater under vest-ed wi-rter rights or rfec::er:cl con<1 i-tionat wirt.er rigllts,includi-ng objecL.ors herein, provided said structures are operaterlitr accordance with the Plan ior Augnrentation;rnc1 Clrange of l{aterRights herein involved. 31' The Park Ditch wat-er rigtrts utilizerl pursualt to this planfor Augmentation sha11 not br: deemec.l airantlonecl I)rlrsuanL Lo tlrc r-orrrtrr itrrrr.ntof selicl shal:es in the Plan for Au<..Jnrr:nLat,iorr i nvllv,r.l Irerli rr. 32. This Ruling of Referee ancl decree constiLute a porti.ol ol:the.law reguired to be et:forcecl by the sLate Ii)n<lineer ;r1<1 Divisi.olEngineer rviilrin the mc--aninq of c.ir.s. 1971, 31 -92-202(2) , 31 -g2-3ot,and 37-92-501(1). rhc.state Enqineer nray lavrfr:l1y be requir:cc1 unclerthe terms of this Rurirrg of lteferee and decrr:e to aclminis.:ter b.hePlan for Augmentation in the rurnner set forth )rc,rein anc not i:.ocurtail diversions, in tirnes of shorLaqe, t-lrrou<;lr sair'l structures,the depletions for which are compensatcd by the .perati<.rn of thePlan for Augnlentation and Ch"rnge of I'/ater itights irer:ein a;rprovecl .'Ihe Division Engineer may 1ar.rfuI1y curtail diver:;ions Lhroirgh si idstrucLures includecl herein if they or ol-irc:r feaLrrrcs oI this pl.an fgrAugmentation are bcirrg operatecl or used in violat.ion of t.he t.crms;rndconditions as outlinecl hercin. The Ref eree cloes therefore conc-1.r.rcle tlra t Llte .rbovc-entit lcd Application for Approval of Plan for Augmentatir-rn anJ Change of !,Jater Riqht should be approvecl . and the structures as clescril;c:d herej-n may be operated in accorclance with this pran for Arrqnrentation, without state administrative curtairment for the benefit of serri_or appro- priations, so long as the terms ancl conclitions herej-n set forth are fu11y adhered to throughout the oireration of this I),1 an for nuqmeltatiol , and that the State Iinqineer: sha11 issue per:nrits for tlre wc1ls, pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, Scctiort 37-90-137, strh jcct- to tht-. con<lj.t.ionl; tlrirl- saicl wel. 1s sh,rl-1. be equil>1rerl wj.t-h t<;ta.].izinc1 f lovr nrptcr-s;sira.1. l. I>e opcr:a tecl only in accordance rvith the l)lan for Arrgnteltatjon as scL forth hcrein, and diversions shalI lrc curt.ailecl tlrrou,r]r sai <l sL-rrrc:t-rrr:t:s i nr--1rr,:lc,cl -'l - 7 herein if t.hey or olher fcatures of Llris l)lan for Augrnentation ar:e being operated or usecl in viol:rtion of Lhe terms as set forth herein. This plan for augmentation shal1 not trecomc effective, and no vreIl permit shall be issued based upon it nor shall" existing wefls be protected by it, until all structures and cleviccs rer;uired as I described herein have been constructecl and are operating. Applicant, its successors and assiqns, sha1.1 be permitted to continue to utilize the subject five sharres of stock in the P.rrk Ditch Company for irrigation in the historic rnanner until such t-ime as r.rell permits for the 72 sinqle fanrily residerrces are appliecl for and Appllcant, its successors or assigns, desires to put to use the 42.49 acre-feet of additional historic consumptive use determinecl Lo be avaifable hereby. Applicant, as the direct.ion of the Divis i.on lingi.neer, wilI terminate the historic irrigation of 32 acres at such tirrres and to., such extent as are nccesr;ary to lirnib the corrsurnpl.:i.on of rvater from the subject five shares for all pllrpos;es j,r"rcludinc; tlie subjcct wel-Is to no more than 48 acrc-feet per year. It is accordit'tgly OIiDETU}D that this rul ing shall be f ilcd vrith the Water Clerk and sha11 l-recome effective upon such filing, subject to Judicial review pursuant to Section 37-92-304, C.R.S. 1973. ft is further ORDIIRI,;D that a c<tpy of this r-uling sha1J. be file<l with the appropriate Divj.sion Engineer and the .State Llngineer. Done at the City of Glenwood SprinqJs, Coloraclo, thi,s -Z? 4 clay of 1QU. rr:J- , ts.B_O_. No proiosl wos f il:d ir: this rr;oil,.r. Tlre IorcAcing rt,lir,C ir 661S1.;,r..,.1 ond opprcved, crn:l is nr:il,-, 1.h.: BY TITIl REFIlREI]: rl:r:r tt: r S t-a tc Divi s ion tJo. 5 ol (lol"orado -B- e3 Lincoln DeVore 1000 West Fillmore St. Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 (303) 632-3s93 Home Ollice Sundesigns 1315,, Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 Attn: Ted Robinson May 9,L979 RC: GENERAL INVESTIGATION & PERCOI,ATION TESTS CATTLE CBEEK SUBDTVISION GARFIELD COUI\TTY, COLORADO Sir: Transmitted herewj-th is a report concerning an on-sitegeologic investigation and percolation tesL for a pro- posed subdivision located at Cattle Creek in Garfield County, Colorado. Respectf uIIy submitted, LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. Professional Geologist ,// -.( --/"/@rnt V A) re,2rau- Reviewdd by Nancy B. Larnm Professional GeologistMTw/vfb LDTL Job No. GS-10I6 PO Box 1882 Grand Junction. Colo 81501 (303) 242-8s68 P.O. Box 1643 Rock Springs, Wyo 82901 (307) 382-2649 Mi6hael fI Weaver 2700 Highway 50 Wesl P O Box 1427 Pueblo, Colo 81003 Qt91.w-oo_d-Sp11nOs. Colo 81601 D*,.BIT 3(303) 54&1 150 (303) 94s-6020 INTRODUCTION At the request of Mr. Ted Robinson of Sundesigns, personnel of Lincon-DeVore conducted an on- site geologic investigatj-on and percolation testing to deLermine geologic constraints that would affect the development of a proposed subdivj-sion on Catt1e Creek. fhj-s site consists of approxi.mately 24O acres, located about 4 miles east from Highway 82 on Cattle Creek in the southern half of Section II, and the north- ern portion of Section L4, Township 7 South, Range BB ialest of the 6th Prj-ncipal Mericlian. The site is an upland mesa with good exposure; drainage appears good with infiltration pre- donrinati-ng over runoff . Vegetation consists mainly of thick large pinyon pine and juniper trees, with sagebrush and cactus. It j-s our understanding that lot size will be approximately 5 acres aud that water availability is being addressed by another engineering firm. On-site septic disposaf is proposed and the results of the preliminary Per- colatj-on tests will be presented later in this report. Land use in,Ehe general vicinity includes dry land farming and residential development -r- GENERAL GEOLOGg The irestern portron of the site con- sist,s of outcrops of the Pennsylvanian-Permian Age Maroon Formation (pqn-See Plate f). The Maroon Formation consists of red to pink, thick to thinly bedded sandstones, si-ltstones, and shales with thin widely spaced grey limestone units. The units have been highly fractured and IocaIIy contorted; units along the northern bounda4r seern to dip to the north with a moderate dip (20o 25o), whereas units along County Road 103 ,r\ west of the site appear to dip slightly to the southwest. Teritiary basalt flows (Ilc) have covered the Maroon Formation units on the eastern portion of the site with small, thin, scabtered caps of basalt on the western portior of the site. This unit is a highly vesicular to massive, dark grey, olivine basalt, which !s highly fractured and prone to chemical weathering. -2- I ENG]NEERING G-1LoGY. Slope stability for the majority of the sj-te is good, with the exception of a very steep slope in the central portion of the site which has been labeled on Plate I as a potential unstable slope and rockfall area. The slopes along the northern boundarlr which drop-off into CatEIe Creek are also included in this classification; a proper set-back, from these steep slopes should be established and maintained for any proposed development. A fairly large Iandslide (Ofs1 has occurred along the steep slol=of Cattle Creek and, although locat,ed off the site, ernphasizes the potential unstable nature of the slope. No evidence of debris flows were en- countered on the site, however, this potential for flows within the gullies along the southern boundary exists and, therefore, no constructj-on should take place in or near these gullies. Some soil creep was noted on the steeper slopes, but proper design techniqrles can mitigate this problem. Soils on the site will be highly variable, from mqderately expansive clays derived from the basalt flows to silts and sands derived from the Iularoon Formation which, in turn, may be prone to hydrocompaction. Corros-ive minerals may also be encount,ered in the soils derived from the basalt Lr;u.l Maroon Formation. Due to the variable soil conditions existing on the site, .a sj-te specific soils investigationf, a-re recommended to determine areas of swelling soils, corrosive soils and soils prone to hydrocompaction. Foundation recomm- endations for proposed structures on problem soils can be ob- tained from such a study -3- Erosion should t low j-n basalt-clay areas but coutd be moderate to severe in soils derived from the Maroon Formation. Drainage should be carefully controlled and efforts should be made to retain natural vegecation as much as possible to prevent erosion in t,he development. No unusual construcEj-on factors should be encountered with the exception that many areas of shallow bedrock wiII be encountered and may requrre blasting for excavatiorr. Groundwater appears to lie fairly deep as it was not encountered in any lOt test borings. No springs, seeps, bogs or wet areas were observed on-site. Further soil testing may estal:Iish the depth to the water tablq but it does not appear that a shallow waEer table would affect the proposed development. neeir the site, No known radiation hazards exist on or ancl no unusual seismic risk is associated with this site. In additionr no potentially extractable mineral resoufCds were observed on this site. -4- SEPTIC DISPO'-T, N PERCOI,ATION RESULTS Nine preliminary percolation test,s were performed on the site (see plate r). Highly variable soil conditions were encountered across the site and equally variable percolation rates were observed. The following table gives rates and special not,es on tests: &.sts # I 2 3 4 5 6 7 I' 9 PercolaLion Rate Minute,s to Drop One Inch 30 4 60 60 3 30 40 60 6 Nol_es. Basalt Bedrock @ 6' Caliche Zone 2'- 4' Caliche Zone 4'- 6' Maroon Bedrock @ 4' Maroon Bedrock @ 7' B.asalt Bedrock @ 9' . " I It would aropear that there are rnany areas where adequate soil cover and suitable percolation rates will bo foundt however, the presence of a sharlow bedrock or a caliche zone in nrany areas may require the construction df eng- ineered fills or elevated sand filters to retain the effulent for effective bactdrial treatment; the construction of an evapo- transpiration system may be a feasible alternaEive. In surunary the site appears suitable for the proposed development vrith the following considerations: I. Development should be restricted in areas desig-nated as potentially unstable slopes and rockfallareas and in the vicinity of the gullies alongthe southern boundary of bhe site. -5- 3.02 3.02.01 3.02.02 3-o?-os I 3.02.O4 3.02.05 3. 02. 06 A/R/RD -- AGRICULTUML/RESTONVUru,/RIIMI DRISIfi Uses, by right: Agricultural including farms, garden, greenEouse, nrlrsery, orchard, ranch, small animal farm for production of poultry, fish, fur-bearing or other small anirnals and custonary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of persons, animals, or property employed in any oE the above uses, retail establishment for sale of goods processed from raw materials produced on the lot; manufactured home as principle use of t.irc 1ot mecting ctandards hr ccctlcu 5.C11.01(2); (A; 86-09) Kennel, riding stable and veterinary clinic, guiding and outfitting, and park, Single-family dwelling and customary accessory uses. Uses, conditional: Aircraft landing strip, church, @s, day nursery and school;,.' .-' I )' ''. - ''-' i :' Studio for conduct of arts and crafts, home occupation, water impoundments. Uses, special: Airport utility, feedlot as principal use of-TE-1ot-rematorium, agriculture-related business, resorts; broadcasting srudio(A'.B:4=78), golf course drivingrange (A.86-84) , commercial recreatlon facilities (Ag7-73 )Two-family dwelling, ---- 1ot, camper park, ski lift and trails; communicatlon towers (4. 84-78)R:blic gatherings; Storage of oil and gas dritling equipmenr (Ag6-I06) Site for extraction, processing, storage or mEterial handling of natural resources; recreational supportfacilities, and guest house. (4. 79-L32; 80-64; 80-180; 80-515; 81-145; 81-265) r Minimum Lot Area: 2 acres. l'{aximum lot Coverage: Minimrrn Setback: 15 percext . (1) Front yard: (a) arterial streets: 75 feet from street centerline or 50 feet from front lot line, rvhichever is greater; (b) local streets: 50 feet from street centerline or 25 feet from front lot line, whichever is greater; D{HIBIT 4 @x affiln\W,/ ROY ROMER Governor JERIS A. DANIELSON State Engineer OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES r;]f,]r1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 February 7, 1989 (iniiriLlU UUUNTY Garf i el d County P1 ann'i ng Dept . Garfield County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, C0 81601 Re: Pi n'ion Peaks Subdi vi s'ion Sketch P1an, Sec. 1l & 14, T7S, R88W Gentl emen: t^le have reviewed the above referenced sketch plan for a proposed 18-unit subdjvjsjon on 240 acres. The water supply is proposed to be a well system wh'ich is bejng augmented by stockin the Park Ditch and Reservojr decreed jn Case No. 79CW97. Some of this water has already been put to use augmentingfor other nearby subdivis'ions. It 'is unclear how much augmentation water remains avajlable under this p1an. The applicant should show proof of ownership of sufficjent Park Ditch and Reservo'ir stock, which is not already committed to other developments, to serve thjs proposal. We would request to see a detailed breakdown of the augmentatjon water from 79CW97 for the amounts commjtted to each development inciuding this proposal . A'lso, diligence was required on th'is conditional watelin 1988. If dil igence was not granted by the court, the augmentation water may no longer be avajlable. No jnformation has been submitted to our office concerning the physical water supply for the proposed wells. We would ask to see a detailed water supply report on the aquifer characteristics, yields, nearby wells, etc. at the preliminary plat stage. Also, no information has been submitted concerning jnstitutional factors. l,Je would not recommend approval of a water supply plan unless water rights are committed to servjng the development and an jnstjtut'ion, in whichthe homeowners have a voice, js formed that will be responsjble for manag'ing the water system. l,lithout such considerations, we would have to quest'ion the reliability and adequacy of the water system. p Jli* [ [ '; I rr 'l9$g STATE OF COLOTUDO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OT HEATTH 222 So. 6th SL, Room 2-]2 Crand Junction, Colorado 81501 February 2, 1989 Roy Romer Covernor Thomas M. Vernon, M.D. €xecutive Director Garfield CounEY Garfield CountY 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs Planning Courthouse co 9r601-3363 Pi nion Peaks SubCivision Sketcir Plan, Garfield CountY Dear Si-rs: I have reviewed the sketch plan for Piniou Peaks Subdivision and have the f ollowing eolnnents: .) I. The design and plans for the water Department Prior Eo construction, thau 25 people or 15 taPS. Lincoln DeVore sumned uP Problems areas of the ProPerty on Page 5 of shallow bedrock and calicire zones the proper filtration of bacteria If you have any questions, please call Sincerely, John R. Blair, P.E District Engineer lJater Quality Control Division JRB/mb systero nust be aPProved bY this if the systen is proposed to serve tnore with installing leach fields in certain their report. TheY indicate that nay require engineered systems to insure from the septic tank effluent. me ar 248-7L50. SanitarianMaria Wareham, Drinking llater File Garfield CountY Unit Ftr,er l???rilr}.: , : 'r Lr;!; ll Ii.u: e le8d lll i l-i l" j i,. -"_,',ui,iTy 2807W sTAfEOh COLORADQ COI-ORADO DEPARTMENT OT HEATTH 222 So.6th SL, Room 232 Crand Junction, Colorado 81501 February 2, L9B9 Garfield CountY Planning Garfield CountY Courthouse 109 8th Street Glenwood SPrings C0 81601-3363 RE: Pinlon Peaks subdivision sketch Plan, Garfield county Dear Sirs: I have reviewed the sketch plan for Plnlon Peaks Subdivision and have the following commentss Roy Romer Covernor Thomas M. Vernon, M.D Ixecutive Director 1989 1. The design and plans for the water Department Prior to construction, than 25 PeoPle or 15 taPs. 2. Lincoln DeVore summed up problems areas of the ProPerty on Page 5 of shallow bedrock and caliche zones I the ProPer flltration of bacteria If you have any questions, please call Slncerely, ^/'11^ {l fr/;.YU ' -'-r/ John R. Blair, P.E District Engineer Water QualitY Control Division JRB/mb system must be aPProved bY this if the system is proposed to serve more with installing leach fields i'n certain their report. TheY lndicate that may require engineered systems to insure from the septic tank effluent. , me at 248-7150. cc: MarLa Wareham, Garfield County Sanitarian Drinking Water Unit File RF,gi Jlt i i-L L-'r r- 2807W Mount So Soil Conservation District P.O. BOX 1302 February GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 816011' le,e Itj?'ry-*T?E'FlItig I i i.r I t9B9 iii ic-) Ll., , .r.-*u u.vurufV-- Garfield County 1O9 Bth Street Glenwood Springs Planning , c0 81501 Dear Sta ff: At the regular monthly meeting of the Mount Sopris Soil Conservation District Board, they ieviewed the plans for the Pinion Peaks subdivision. The Board hasquality of tnleput in p1ace. wildlife popu would be very no ma jor concerns, but tnouf d note that lls needs to be protected from any sept They al-so noted that this particul-ar lation during some times of the year, important. the wateric system that is area has a large and dog control Their only other concern vvas proper reclamation of any road disturbance They feel that well planned reclamation of a disturbed area will a11ow l-ess movement of material and proper placement of material during any excavation will result in reduced cos Disturbed areas will need shaping of and mul-ching, weed control and reappl that have failed for whatever reason. ts on the project. topsoils, seeding PreParationication of any of the stePs Shaping: The area to be recl-aimed needs to have slopes that are as flat ai possible with 3:1 (H:V) beinq the steepest. 0ther things to be considered in shaping include drainage patterns, drainage area, needed conservation pra-tices such as diversions if needed, slope aspect, and soil factors and conditions. Top Soil: For any vegetation to become established suitable plant growth medium must be provided, generally the use of stockpiled iop soil is the souICe of this medium. Any top soil stock pile will need to be seeded to a grass species if it will be more than a fe1nr months before the soil is Ieapplied to an area, to control soil loss from climatic conditions. A minimum of 5 inches of top soil is needed on all- areas to be reseeded and in some instances, top soil may be required to be placed back in proper soil horizon layers. Seeding and Mulching: A firm, rnleedfree seedbed, fertilized if recomm6nded, needs io be made prior to seeding. This may require any number of operations depending on soil conditions, moisture and other climatic factors. Mulching should be done to conserve moisture and for reduction of soil- tempetatute, which helps insure vegetation establishment. Mulch should be grass hay or straw and aoptieO at the rate of 4000 1bs. per acre. The material should be CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT SELF.GOVERNMENT Roaring t"tn., *t*n,,.o'nt*'ut,,,*t-t Boi B?O G lenwood' Spii ngd ;: Cotorad:o"8,1'602-0820 Telephone (303) 945-6558 ' ' DWIGF{T L. HE[M, Superintendent DR. JAMES L. BADER, Assrsfant Superintendent RO BE Rf CO LLETT, Assr'stant S u perintende nt FebruarY !, 1989 Garfield CountY Conmissioners ' l-09 8th Street "i""*""a SPrings ' Co 8l-501 Ref: Pinion Peaks Subdivision Attached,aretwopiecesofinformationapplicabletothis proPosed subdivision' First, due to the conditions of Road \1'' school buses are not permitted to travel "l :li; section--tilf'"t from the north or t.he south so rransportatioi ;;t studentJ";;"id not be available' Arso, we hav"-irro*"d stud'inil' a-n"ii "rr-oi"L-"t school attendance' either at caJUIra"ft , ot -Glenwood Springs ' If attending carbondale, we suggest ti'"l-pitents traisport them to the juncrion of *I"a.-irZ "rra.'iO5l--ir soino io Olenwood' the nearest bus pickup would b;"1;" J;";tioi;; ioaas LL2 and 11"3' (See attachei-'"*t dated L/9/89) Asfortheimpactonschoolsduetot!.increaseinpopulation,- we are asking rhar.a fg: "i-sioo per f;^ii;-unit be charged' and collected at the time trre Luirding o"t*ii-''"-ltsued' The second attachment, a draft of a p;;;;;;;=oiai"t""" we have been workins on, addresse! in" impact ;;;; and is offered for your consideration' Prease k9';;-in-mina' i;-i; a ar"tL' but should sive some idea of our,11iiilr"I ,i"ir,it-*tit*t' It will probablv need, some revision prior l"-"6"=iaeration-iot adoption' and wourd eventually replace o".pti="t't policy dealing with land dedications.,'d*on"yinlieuofland. Iflfr'. r-?rm.-ml ljl1 rri z,leae iiiliL}-... GARhli:Lij UOUNTY Dwight copy:Mark Bean t GLENWOOD SPBINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL , , P.O. BOX 1580 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 BERNARD D. SELTING Principal HOWABD C. JAY Assislanl Principal Pinion Peaks Subdivision I had the opportunity Lo go up to the proposed -.subdivision toaay. t would stiongly advise not sending a ;p LLz Road. th-is is mainly because of the steepness and narrow curves of the road. bus the AccordingtoDr.BaderrW€donotbringabusupfrom the south for the same reasons. students who currently live up LL2 Road attend schools in Carbondale and the parents provide transportation.to the LLz Road and 103 ROad ,:unct.ion. rt is my understanding that we have allowed these students to attend either Glenwood or Carbondale schools. If we do have any students who wish to attend school in Glenwood, I suggest that we have a bus stop at 113 and LLz Roads and that piients provide transportation to that stoP. e Z dlr RESOLUTION ThisResolutlonlsadoptedbycheBoardofDlrectorsofthe RoaringForkSchoolDlstrictRE.lpremiseduponthefollowing: (1)TheLegislatureoftheStateofColoradorr:andatedthat the Board of county commissioners of the counties of the State make prorision for ihe acquisition of sites for schools or payr'ent ofasumofmoneyequaltochemarketvalueofsuchschoolsites, o, " "orUinatlon -of ihe t*o, (C'R'S' 30-28-133) ' (2) The application of the mandate of the State Legislature applies to counties only and not to cities and towns' (3) The Counties of Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin have implemented the mancate of the state Legislature and the School District is nor^, and has for nanv years Past been the beneficiary of resolutions adopted by said counties requiring the dedication of land for school sites or Payment in lieu thereof r or a combination of such dedication and palnnent ' (4)ItisaPParentthattheimpactonschoolscausedbvner^' development is the same whether or not the develoPment is located wirhin the boundaries of a municipality or in the county' (5)Thecom:nunityofCarbondal'ehasadoptedanordinance sinilar in its application to the subcivision resolutions in effect in the Couoii"s of Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin; houever, the com$unities of Basalt and Glenuood Springs have not adopted such i"!i.f"tion and developrnents occurring within che boundaries of Glenuood springs and Basalt are not obligated to dedicate elrher school sites or pa)'a sum of moneY in lieu thereof' (5)TheSchoollrisrrictisoftheopinionthatitisIair , and equitable that all CeveloPments, whether or not located within 'if," l.-tr.ay or a nunicipalitl', share in the impact r"hich such developnenE imposes upon the Schoc'1 District ' (7) The effect c,f the anplication of the su'ccivis-lcn regulat jons of the counties of Ga:f ie1d, Eag3 e and Piikin ]'as :een beneficial to rhe Sc1ioc1 District; ho'".'ever, ii js inefiic:en: in nanv respects and inpcses a burclen uPon the ceveloper u::hou: a conr-ensurate benef it to the School Dj strict, examples c'f ui''lch are: -(a)Lancscledjcatedforschoolsjtesareusua]1v ScattereC and have not resulted in a usable school site being::'a<ie available to the School District; (h) Dedication of land for school sltes re:ioves:he land frorn the ta): base, does not necessarilv aid the School District and if sold, Puts the School I\istrict i'n a co::pecit:"'e posifion r.'ith the private sector; rt (c) lloney paid in 1leu of dedlcatlol of lschool slte lsbaseduPonthe"l"eofthelandwhichlsnotalrlaysan appropriate'testtodetermlnethelmpactontheSchoolDlstrlct inasmuchassotreofthe,oreexpensivelandcreatesasmaller irPr.. than inexPensive land' (8) The School DlstricE 1s of the oplnlon that ' the most equitable r".noa of "rriralng.tL school Distrlct in the impact imposed uPon it by ''"' a"titf"oPment 1s the contributlon of a set sum of *on"y based uPon a per unit basis' ' Nol{,THEREFoRE,BElTRES0LVEDbytheBoardofDirectorsofthe RoaringForkSchoolDistrlctRE-ltt,atthecommunitiesofGlenwood SpringsandBasa1tbe,"q,""."d.-.oaddressthequeStionofirnposinga schoolirrpactfeeuPonallnewdevelopmentoccurringwithinche boundaries of the comtnunities and that t,he community of Carbondale be requested to coisider amending its ordinance to impose a school impact feeonlyanddereteanyreferencecodedicationofschoolland. BElTFURTHERRESoLVEDthatthecomnunitiesofGlenwoodSprings, BasaltandCarbondaleadopc,,,--*din"n."r^lhichwouldimposeaschool irnpacr f ee of sido. oo per unir uiirr, ,u.t dolLar amount to be adjusted based upon an established crit"rl" ]or Ehe value of a dollar such as the consumer price i;;;" or be ra:"rt"a in conformity wich the school Flnance Act of i988. BEITFURTHERRESoL\,EDthatallfeesbecollecteduponissuanceof abuildingpermit,bepaidal'""tr,totheS.choolDist'rictandbelimited for use within the capital reserve fund of the School District' BElTFURTHERRESoLVEDthatshouldcheconrnunitiesofGlenwood springs, Basali '-;;; carbondale adopr an ordinance such as bv this Resolution ,"qr"*"a, rhe Schiol District Policy FEE be amended to reflect rhe action taken by such communities' : ' BE iT FURTI]ER RESOLVED that ccrpies of thi s Resolution be distributed to.h".o,,n,',nities of Glenr^,ood Springs, Basa]c and Carbondale requesting tt"t-'cie- subject hereof be discussed and actltrn taken t'v the gor,erninAbedlesofsaidccrlrunitiesactheirfirstpessibleconvenience. C:RTI FlCATE Fran Smedra heret'v certifies Resolution r.'as unaninouslv adcpted b1' ;;;;i;;-iork school District RE-r at its that rhe above and foregoing ;;" Board of ltirectors of the regular meecing held cn lrecember I T t T t I t I T I I I T I I I I t I SCHMUESEP (IN MEYEN INC. March'14, 1989 Mr. Scott Writer P.O. Box 9705 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Pinyon Peaks, Garfield Countyfndividual Sewage Disposal Systems Dear Scott: The p:r1nse of this letter is to sunnarize the results of trnrcolation test-ing done previously by Lincoln-DeVore and the feasibility of installing irdividual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) on the above referenced property. The Lincoln-De\lbre retrnrt indicated that percolation rates varied betr+een 3 min/inch and 60 min/inch cver the property. A total of nine holes were constructed and tested. Based r-ipon this information, as well as a visual exanination of the property, it a[T)ears the trnrc.olation tests r^Duld be representative of anticipated percolation rates in the observed soil t1pes. There is rc reason not to assume that similar trnrcolation rates will be found on each of the prognsed 18 lots. It is anticipated that standard septic tank/leach field systems can be constructed for a majority of these 1ots. In the event site specific restraints are found during the construction on a trnrticular lot, it may be necessary to construct an engineered slzstem, either a Wisqcnsin nound sys- tem or an eva[p-transpiration (ET) system. Restraints wlrich may occur v,ouldbe excessive perc,olation rates, inadeguate percrclation rates or bedrockconditions. Idcne of the sites lvould pneclude an engineered system from being cronstructed. Attached hereto is a proposed management plan for fSE's. ff fol1owed, the managsnent plan 'apu1d assure that the septic tanks qere p:mped out on a regular basis, but the p"rrpose of the management plan is rpt to guarantee a trnrticular system against failure or to provide a furding mechanism for repair of failed systems. I will remain available to provide additional information as needed. ThisIetter will serve as an exhibit for the keliminary PIat Subrnission to Garfield Cor:::rty. Respectfully subnitted, SCHMUESER GCRDCN ME)ER, IlC. 2 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 -,enwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-1004 CONSULI'NG E/VG'A'EERS & SUSYEYOBS DET I I T t I I I T I I I t t I T I T I I PII{YON PEAI(S MAI{AGEUMW PLAN FOR INDNIDUAL SEIGGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS A. PurtrDse The purpose of this managernent plan is to provide for regular oper- ation and maintenance of the irdividual sewage disposal systems. Ihe management plan provides a mechanism for regular pumping of septic tanks and for funding the cost thereof. rhis managernent plan is rrct intended to provide for oonrnon ownership of sewage dis- posal facilities, nor to provide a mechanism for funding for, or the actual construction of, replacement of irdividual systems. B. Restrnnsibility of Managenent Plan The management plan shall be the responsibility of the Pinlon Peaks Homeor,,rners Association. The Homeowners Association sha11 make arrangements with a septic tank Ermping comtrnny for the p:mping of septic tanks on a t$,o-year, rotating basis. C. E\rding The Pinlon Peaks Fbmeowners Association will oollect, as part of the Association dues, sufficient funds to pay for the bi-annual punping of septic tanks. The amount of funds oollected shalI be adjusted as necessary to pay for the oost of the managsnent plan. D. frdividual Hcnreo+ner Responsibilities 1. kovide access to the septic tank for purposes of cleaning. required, based on actual2. tr:mp septic tank nxrre frequently, if use. Initially install, arxd subsequently replace, failed leach field sletems as required, all in accordance with applicable Garfield County Health Codes. 3. LEAVENWORTH & LOCHHEAD, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW June 13, 1989LOYAL E LEAVENWORTH JAMES S. LOCHHEAD W. OAVID RIPPY 1011 GRANOAVENUE P.O. DRAWEB 2O3O GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (3O3) 945'2261 Mr. ivlark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 109 Eighth Street, Suite 306 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 GnirFiELD CCUi\iTY Re: Pinon Peaks Subdivision Preliminarv Plan Dear Mark: Enclosed please find two opinion letters concerningr the CLDC WelI No. 5. The new well wai drilled at the decreed location and, according to both engineers, has the capacitl' to provide the Subdivision's water supply requirements without interfering with other well users. ilease ensure that the Planning and Zoning Commission members receive copies of these letters. Also encloied is a letter dated June '7, 1989, from the State Engineer's Office indicating they have no further objections. Very trulY Yours, LEAVENWORTH & LOCIIHEAD, P.C. Leavenworth LEL: r1n Enclosurescc: Scott Writer w/enc.william L. Lorah w/enc. Scott Fifer w/enc. / ENARTECH lnc. Consutting Engineers and Hydrologists June 9, 1989 -=Rw% ZAIS.- Mr. Scott Writer P.O. Box 9708 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: C.L.D.C. Weli No.5, Pump Test Dear Scott: #&N Pursuant to your request, ive have completed a reconnaissance le'''ei analvsis of the rveil-pump tesi data associateri rvith your recentlv compieted C.L.D.C. Weil No. 5. You have askecj for an opinion as to wheti:er or not tl:e data susses:s that a reiiaole phvsical water supply can be de'.'elopec! to se:'"e a oro:oscri se','enieen unit resiientiai ce"'elopment in the vicinit','. It is olrr uicerstanciing that ti:e de',,eiopment rvould include Iinited outsice latvn ir:'isation anci stock ri,atering ancl that total annual diversions rr'ouicl l:c'i e:;ceci i0 to i2 aci'e [eet of water. Ti:e foilorving oroviies a sumnian'of oi:i i:;-.c:ncs. T::e inlormx'Lion provicieC us indicares ihat the pump tesi was cottciuc:erj l;',' Wricht Water Enginee:s o!'er a 2-1 hour period beginning at 10:42 Ar\'1. lIlv ri. r939. ,\ susiained pun:ping rate cf 50 gallons per ririnute (gpn) rvrs ac:iieveci aiter approximateiv 3 hours oi operation. Baseci upon our re'.'ie'."' and anaivsis of the pump data, the follorving obsen'ations are macie. A tinie-drari,cioivn analysis was comple'.ed to ascertain the aqu iier characteristics. The anah'sis reflects that tiie transmissivity of the aquifer is enpro.ximately 800 [t2/cjay. Tiris value is reiatively higir and indicates thai the rvell has very good potentiai for development of a reliable domestic rvater sr.rppiv s!'stem. The observed drawdorvn associated rvith the nearby (800 feet+-) "log-house" rveil rvas negligible. This indicates that the storase capacity (storitivity) of the aquifer is relatively good. 332 ti;nth Streer. Su,re 3:5 P.O. Dre',..'or t60 Giet.voco Sczncs. Cotoraco €i602 (303) 945'2235 2. Ivlr. Scott Writer June 9, 1989 Page -2- 3. The weil recovery data show that the rvell did not fuliy recover to the pre-test Static water level24 hours after the pump test was terminatecl. This inclicates that a continuous discharge of 50 gallons per minute exceeds the aquifer recharge abiiity. However, we understand that the C.L.D.C. Weil No. 5 will have a marimum diversion capacity of 20.0 gpm and an average diversion rate of 7.5 gpm. In summary, based upon our review of the pump test data, it appears that ti:e C.L.D.C. Weil No. 5 can reliably support a residential community oi' aporoxinrately seventeen units. At the contempiated average pumpine iaie of 7.5 _epm and an annuai rvithdrarvai of 10 to 72 acre feet oi rvater. it :s improbable that tl:e y,'ell rviil interfcre vrith neighboring water suppiie.s. If you have any quesrions concerning this letter, please do not I:esitate to call me. S ince reir', E.\{ARTEC:J, IAIC RSF/bea 25S-01 cc: Lee Leaven',/ror-J1 \Vright Water Engineers, lnc. DENVER OIFICE :490 lvest 25th Ave.,5uite 100 A Denver, Colorado 80211 {303) 480-1700 TULsA OFFICE 201 West 5th 5t., Suite '130 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103 (918) s84-7135 GLENIVOOD SPRINGS OFFICE 818 Colorado Avenue P. O. 8ox 219 Clenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 (303) 94s-7s5 Denver Direct Line: 893-1608 June L3, 1989 Scott Writer Pinyon Peaks Development P.O. Box 9705 Aspen, CO 81612 Re: Pinyon Peaks Developnent Dear Scott: ?er our contracr Droposal of ilay 5, L9E9 we have ccmpleted explorat:on anci tesiing of CLDC'rieIl *5. The well was drrlLeci at its decreed lccacion in the NE1,z4 of the lrli^r-1l4 of Seccion 14, Tc'*nship 7 South, Range 88 i'iesc of the 6th P.M., at a point which bears SE6o53'46"8 a ciistance of 18E0 feet frcm the northwest corner of saici Sec:lcn 14. The well location'"'as f:eld stakeci cv Schmueser, Gc:don, ilever, Inc. -..= uu'\--Ju / LL --1= o'L=: L-.::a)\ sicne ani basal-: tal-us underlain bv ilarccn iormaticn bedrcck. Th= iiar:cn icrmacion consisis of redclisn ar!:cs:c sanostone with inter^:is cf. s:l-tsr:ne, cla',,'sECne, and scrne ccnci::r=rata and 1i:ilestcne. T:.= ""'a:=r^:arinq ;onss in che i.'iarc.n Fcr=a::cn lre generaiJ-y lccated in f :ac'-:jr:', :-i,t!- --.i ,,^-i..l,/ ,-cmcr-:ri qpr-ijr.n:ir:_r l-cr!q- Chalt-n:r Dril_l jnO CC:.:af:.,- :f-3*.1.,1-LJ C'l.L.l nE:a.".-v L=:.:=:.-=u )c'--.:l=ll!a:-- L=JJ. Jll=:u--r !r!--:rr\- l=<Al.- Collr:d^ lrr:li-.ri: qro^;^:ir -^r:r'r riC tO CCnS-,-fUC: CLDC,';=il =].-..iqr-, !JrvLqu- L.lL-:--='i a >L==-.Jui: -'-:31 / i- _l:'le ccr:s:ruc::cn iiagr= and general- c?cicgic icg of CLDC Well- *5 :s si.:".n rn fi.gure 1. Frcm figure I it can be seen that 61 feet of 7 inc: sur:ace casing',.;as used and 350 feet of 5li2 inch steeJ- casing was instaliei. rhe 5l/2 inch steei casii:tr.,,/as perforac=i:n the l'larccn Fornaticn 1=r'-::e i.ncervaf ircm 280 tc tl00 feer. On l'lay 31, L989 a 24 hour pumping losi vaS performed cn CLDC rdeLL =1. The c'-mp1ng :ace of '-he weil- began at l-7.3 -n ar:d.+as inc:=a"ed rvhen i-- 3ec:jre apparen-- thar the 1o,...'er prccuc-,ion rat3:,;cu.l-c not signrficanti-y sc:=ss:hei;aiL. if'"=r 150 minuces of pumping '.',at=r produc;-icn f rom the x=il ',rES increasad tc 50 gpn. Fricy gallcns per ninuie'ras the maximum pulng:ig rate oi the test pump;vhich had been inscaLlec:n the weII. The weilr*?S gu:.=ed ac 50 c:a for the renainoer of the 24 hcur cest. A tocal of 70,300 Sailcns were pur.peci during the test pericci. The ma.xinrum drawdoryn during the pumping test was 3 . 58 feet. Eigrrre 2 presents a plot of the time versus dralrdown of the pumped weIl. The wel-I e.xhibited continuous drarudown with time over the punPing period. Water sa.:nples for q:ality analysis were taken 19 hours into the pumping test. D.rring the pumping test basic water guality parameters were moni- tored. The tenperature of the gror:nd'.vater was 59oF, the conduc:j.vity averageC 475 unrhos/cm, and the pH averageC 7.1. '![drE TALUS /oue*SuRDEN O--GRoUND SURFACE L r'v ?-- i: -7 ;-..ch o.O. Surface casinq cerneoieol- in ploce v' IlARCON FORMATION - Red.JisJ" ackasic :lc arJstone wi*h inlerb4.s of s;/t- S*ane , cloysior',e, tlo^d. 1afr1e Csn, liOrzre.o:e a..J t;,',e\lon€. ?.ccts aere.rollt cat.c..e)rs / __l S'/r. incl- o,c.Sleel .rsi^1 I,.1 I Ivl .-L /=, /r= le ,ci : ltia.l\ 3 ;c * i6.-nes br.o -/' ? ;^.'nit feei *ol.i - l./ r -5rZ inc!^, O.3. Sle<l e,e!tact 5lci e,-ic.r-a-e* !,-cr,t "=;;'lo +ac f t. (s lo l-= o.:pr-c.x. I I.!c =f n TIGUIi'f CLDC WELL NO. 5 Gaue.RALl z =D CoN5TRUcrroN DIr:-.n,A,t.l ,A.ND - +30 ,l <- /) { +M a= tr-ro trCn:a*0- 't _-u ,\)-! I-8q -..-5 { rc) x ! c n --\ lil -., I c - , i )-,/i "-l -r-V1.1. !-:-:-- --9 5 a --- -9 ----9 ----L --- -8 ----5 ----oI Scott l.iriter June 13, 1989 Page 4 The recovery curve of the weII, plotted as residual drawdown, is shown onfignrre 3. A projection of the residual drawdown c'Llrve shows that the draw-down will not be zero when t/t' becomes r:nity. This would indicate thatrecharge to the- well .durlng the test was leis than 50 gpm pumping rate.The field data for both the pumping and recovery tests ar5-at€aclied.- In addition, two obserrration wells were monitored, one well was located 700feet from !h.e eumeed we11, the second was located 3000 feet from the pumpedweI1. Neither of the observation wel1s showed any measurable arivAiwn beyond barometric effects The-average annual water diversion reolirement for the propcsed subdivi.sionwi]1 be approximately 7-9 gpm. rt is our opinion that -cr,ol wett *5 is ca| e$: gf providing this modest amount of grbund',rater for the proposed sub-divisicn without adverseJ-y impaccrng other existing water weLl users. It is cur opinion ihat the annual averaoe recharge (natural precipitat:on)tc the 200 acres of Pinizon Peaks propercy will exceeci the 14.5 acre-feecwhich is proposed to be withcira',rn by'the s'.rtriivision. The net effecr tothe aq:i.fer will be demininn:s. h'e wilL inform you of the ',;ater qual.ity of the groundwater once we receivethe labcratory results. The preliminar'; field test wouLd indicate that thesource is accectable. If ycu iiave anv cuestrcns please feel free to call_. !?rrr truly yours, iF.JGiiT IIATEF. B]CI}IEFF.S, I}IC. BY -Ih^--^. I 7a^^"t^, ql lrq Thomas A. Zancaneila, P.E. \ I ,-. izy L.tlL rr.i,,^ L Lt.iil[, t lZL,l.-Wri-liam L. Lorah, -D.E. I Vice Presicienc I TPZttriLL,Lcnt 89r--04e. c00 (..-.'(.,.U r sENll-LoGn lll I llt'llc 4 r-\ LL-Ls x ill t)lvll:l( )l I i floE xeurreL & EssEn co. x*r rd us^. F IGDBE ifl 'li, RES t Ct.u AL | ,u 9,!F,-r 46 UUI:i yELL xaye, l)R trep No. S sTATlc yATER SEygy, ?*L,l* //. TYPE CF TEST: PUMP SETTING: OBSERVATION WELLS , ,tnn--,.*=! ,^roll l^A*) CLN, r{o. 4- lzu;--,-1 r.22_ | - /-Duz - fi-:c=,: .-)l::} n/ l-.f-e -ii. ./ | -|,;ot, d 1a "n- ,r/ tri) .,o rrl t /t-t s ll WE L L DATA ITEASURIHG POINT: !"0 aY -,1'L- - #. rr,o.a TorAL oEprH , ,f =o l/. 't TOP OF SCREEN:- 0 PUMP TIAKE: HOOEL: BOWL DIAHETEi'_ H.p oroi et7F.VOLTS: AMPS: o^rE I ,,r. I ,,*u*. I ,orr, I o^r, I r^re. II | ('t I I ILEYELI ,'lrl;l*-,1 COI HEITS [,,,,, 'rnrt i.p 23 a r... ;^ - I ',1 zt, t t: i=' o1'^. I I I I iz--.i:r ---= I I I 5'i /'v'7 \: .= at 1 I -.| /z/ <t I /zzzi tcr: I lzui:-l t.c3 | t lz+-t.zoi t.cG I ;rj'{r /?(J . I ICA /-B=l i.6i ! | | I ; l i: iD i- (_Ili-t-r * ,'Za'-l l/ z'izt / 2 \t3 izi ', z '., ln= t- : -t I l--lr . I -- Irll ,.- -l - - | -l -I | --1 !'l-', l' :-:-i -'.a: i I' r-' -/,r'rt,t-?Lll.a=; -.ar I i t. --, -,| , - ' t r '.it Jrt t", | , .-'r -. lr_t- I .-.-..' .:- -aot l^liI - e- '' I I -l I l'{0DEL' TYPE:- ra lr-t/zl l-ltlll il t t-.ll.- t , -t I I yELL NAr,rE: h)n ;rr a No , 1 STATIC WATER LEYZL. ?*6, l'! PUMP SETTING I OBSERVATION Yi E!.LS: C t oc il)."q BOWL DIAM ol0i et7r. PUMP r?= 3. t{. PI MOTOR ITIAKE: MOOEL: VOLTS: A MP S: cc ! rElrTs f ,*,r,^.j *^; L /.,- I rarER I LEYEL I oRlw- oor x !, ci l.l,, lrlJii:",| olIrIt lltlrllrti Z?Z +r.e I TIEASUR ING POINT: TOTAL OEPTH: ToP oF SIREEN, ?&11* oarE I r,".I .,i,,1*,lrorr'Io^r, I a p,1 'il, rf I <': t^,,-I / r' IZ, ,u I z.z. I lz+e-czt t.?* i lz"l.z,- I z- lzuq .zc I z. I zvg.ot I l3l.2 ?'al_- .,1: WE L L DATA I{AKE: MCDEI-' TYP:TYPE: - 44 !,/I lu c. --,9 -a'l l,rs/ ^=I I ltL"i\ -l ^ --.. I i^ -i *^f-:-'::l lo.: i Zeo, ) =ry ,lS c,: /qoc- \ | )-t I !ta',? /r' ,r I l--^ , ,1 r' .=.-:.,-..':.- a:- -- l:=-= ''-i- i I l.X','1 .,)I I - l:u.- i I 1 i i -:^l ->: i I l-l'r..-_r_.-i t-i ir i-..:l - - l--o r.r I Il(:i ,=,, i t,t='=l rcZf i .; ias,+l t- : ;'--- I I l;.ir:.zl .f ai?'- Z'-to.-:l=.<'), i' I I I | ,t.e i ':-: I ,:,- ' i l: tr:-t I t::-z I I C,.i .-. I I l;-te..-t Z.:= I I = lt.'=l llrli-i ) :i -,'- i I lr--r.,^?t 2.-i I - E:-.li I :i,.- i I l?,-3-=. 12.-= I I^l:--,:l r^l i .'a I,i-J I t -rl - Il:)z) l'-') 1 I,;::ltc-c/ | J',-., ,t 1't72417 c\t 1 .-.c..J I /;- -05ip ;1m{ avr'9'r,l uc/ct/S_ ( It---_ {9Efs ' t u.F)sd -r,I hz rt-S -'{- ----'');vi- (*" (t^ri :8';;; t- -'E t*:" -:l ,l '-" "'7', .., ,Zl'Aq) h€ol ozol (,.u si 6 txz)+l a '"'-i , 5b'-1 : zi' zo' 'ou / ) I'l'n* LC: CI70 ,8'.^, - \, ,^r, ulr)p - a; -r-.ir,6\- l.g t,,t.p/ D or", 'rit o ) O of.' Yj:) \, //.'(4 -1 L ,eL(- l7(1 )ovL4. L I b a 'lt {" I I 'L7 ,t r.i..,;)rli ;i,:,1r,,,". ROY ROMER Govemor OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3s81 June 7, 1989 JERIS A. DANIELSON State Engineer B 4rdr4fi\flF tIJUN 12 i9B9 tIAVfiit?sFIH & I-0ffiif,q Ps. l'1r. Mark Bean Garfiejd County P1anning Dept. Garfield County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, C0 81601 Re: Pinyon Peaks Subdivision Prel'imi nary Pl an Sec. 11 & 14, T7S, R88tl Dear Mr. Bean: l,le have received adcjjtiona'l informa*,'ion concerning the above referenced orel'iminary plan from Lee Leavenwor:h, iegai counc'il for the projeci prcoonents. Incl uded was a I j st of the augmentati on water from Case No. 79CNg7 cor,nni'uted to other developments and a copy of the shares of the Park D:-"ch owned by the Carbondale Land Development Corporation. Hr. Leavenworth al so states that the wel I s to be constructed for thi s devel opment wi 1 1 be wi'"hi n 200 feet of thei r ciecreed I ocations. Thi s j nformati on addresses the concerns we expressed i n our I ast letter: to the county dated Hay 2, 1989. As long as the conditions d'iscussed 'in Mr. Leavenworth's jetter to the county are compl ied with, we have no fur;her objec'uicns to this proposa'l . Lle would point out, however, that t,he consumpt'ive use anaiysis by Mr. Zancanella d'id not jnclude water for I jvestock as per Case No. 79tH97. It appears thai, adequate water w'il'l be avai'lable for the livestock allowed by the ciecree. S r ncerei y, h**#%// Qrr i^l D. S'impson, P.E.r Deruty State [ngineer HDS/JCM:2957I Oriyn Be'll, Divis'ion Engineer Steve Lautenschi ager Lee Leavenworth " I -."*"**-'-J