HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application•
•
•
•
•
•
P.RE.S.HANA
F A R M
3275 100 Road, Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(303) 963-1885
•
•
•
•
•
•
s
•
•
PRESHANA FARMS
APPLICATION
FOR
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ZONING AMENDMENT
OWNERS
HENRY & LANA TRE1TIN
3275 100 Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
PLANNING
LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, INC.
P.C. Box 517
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
ENGINEFRING
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING
Village Plaza
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Revised
August 23, 1989
•
•
(
land design
partnership
August 3, 1989
Mark Bean, Planning Director
109 8th
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
RE: PRESHANA FARMS PUD
Dear Mark:
Attached, herewith, is the revised PUD Application for Preshana Farms. This
document reflects the recommended conditions of the Planning and Zoning
Commissions approval, as well as a zone district name change. The lodging
district has been retitled Service Residential District . The Land Use
Summary for the project has also been incorporated into your 100 -scale file
copy of the PUD Zone Map.
Your assistance in the processing of this application has been appreciated.
Sincerely,
-�7
Ronald B. Liston
Attachment: Revised PUD Application
P.O. Box 517 • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
918 Cooper Avenue
(303) 945-2246
•
•
•
PRESHANA FARMS
3275 100 Road
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(303) 963-1885
April 7, 1989
Board of County Commissioners of
Garfield County
Garfield County Court House
109 8th
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
RE: Preshana Farm P.U.D. Application
Dear Commissioners:
Attached herewith, please find the plans and information required by the
Garfield County Zoning Regulations, for an application for a zone district
amendment. As owners of Preshana Farm, we are requesting to change the
present zoning from Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density to Planned Unit
Development.
It is our goal to create a high-quality equestrian center in accompaniment
• with a limited number of very unique residential housing opportunities. The
concept of the project will preserve the pastoral open space character of the
farm, while creating a very exciting addition to the housing opportunities in
the mid/lower valley area. The concept is a compatible and logical extension
to the Ranch at Roaring Fork Development.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
Ron Liston, our planning consultant, at 945-2246.
•
Sincerely,
Mr. & Mrs. Henry & Lana Trettin
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PRFSHANA FARM P.U.D
Preshana Farm, previously referred to as Saint Finbarr Farm, is bounded on the
east by County Road 100, on the north by Highway 82, on the west by the Ranch
at Roaring Fork and on the south by what remains of the Saint Finbarr Farm
property. The Catherine Store property is located at the northeast corner of
Preshana Farm and is not part of the farm property. The site is characterized
by extensive equestrian facilities including:
Two indoor riding arenas
Stable barns
Residences and paddocks and,
Pastures and equestrian paddocks.
The site slopes gently (2-4 percent) from the northeast to the southwest. The
majority of the site is characterized by pasture lands and equestrian
facilities. In the southwest portion of the site is a strip of land protected
by private covenant as a Greenbelt. This area contains extensive mature
growth of cottonwood. With the exception of some portions of the Grccnbelt
area, the Preshana Farm site is not within the Roaring Fork River 100 -year
Flood Plan.
The property is presently zoned Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density. The
farm is operated as an Equestrian Riding Center, providing horse boarding and
training services and facilities. Existing dwelling units on the property are
used for employee housing for the Farm Operations.
bo
•
24 i)_
reek
Spr t
+6805
rr I' I
1
II
I tai o
7/. _'j:6922 ;/' 1p/ -2A
i
v I , 1 , ,
b:1 ,77-1-
� I I
L, - I 4�` 1 \� ii
( i •\ If r, /-
-
//
70 r6
- � �/ N.. i \
� 1 .
1
\ X6875/ -
%;i ,ii' i' - f
\ �V���/
9
7009
X 6285
7
(% 29
-9
4i29i u
II
orr• \
H ANAa
.. 4
0
+6289
6400
'li
4
Y
P-
•_•.+4:�:io.
vipiKNN INL I N. / !
- : "--7 : 7-- 7: 7 kAk : SS\ / 1
/L — _ /Mulford F R
—
6284
I
ii
COUNTYac,RD
g%R 32
��:�73 R -
-'67 2_� ( i.
v I i i
:•• r
6895 z
x 6895 \ \ • •\✓
��i / \ , ��` 'i '
`� �% p L )
o0,-
0
e
•F
1
•
•
0
Goa,
6e
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
41
PRESHANA FARM P.U.D
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
Since the acquisition of the farm property, in 1988, the applicant has
undertaken extensive improvements and expansions to the equestrian facilities
at the farm. A major emphasis of the improvements have been, to not only
accommodate the equestrian functions, but to provide a more pleasant facility
for the horse owners, students and their guests.
Consistent with the high quality of the Preshana Farm Equestrian Center, the
applicant proposes to develop a limited number of extremely high quality
residential housing opportunities. It is perceived that the market for these
housing opportunities may be somewhat diverse in their desires for types of
units and property maintenance responsibilities.
Preshana Farm is proposed to be divided into five zoning districts generally
described as follows:
Open Space District:
This district contains the pastures and farmlands of the property.
Fir uestrianCenter District:
Within the Equestrian Center District, are located all the major
structures associated with the farm and equestrian activities, as well
as employee housing facilities. Included in this district are
provisions for a Tack Shop and Veterinary Clinic, which are consistent
with the Equestrian Center functions.
Residential/Single Family District:
Within this district are proposed ,single family lots of 15,000 square
feet or larger. These lots face onto a 100 -foot road right-of-way,
which incorporates extensive landscaping and water features. The rear
of the lots face onto open space tracks of the Polo Field and adiacent
properties of Saint Finbarr Farm. The lots are designed so as to
provide maximum exposure to the landscaped right-of-way, and to open
space. The eastwest orientation of the lots also provides for
excellent solar exposure.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Residential/Cluster Housing District:
The Cluster Housing District is designed to accommodate eleven (11)
patio homes. The patio homes are grouped around a central
courtyard/cul-de-sac and all look out upon open space areas. The patio
homes are intended to meet the requirements of buyers" who desire the
privacy of a single family dwelling unit, with intensely landscaped
outdoor rooms without the responsibility for maintenance of a large
residential lot. These lots provide for zero setbacks on one lot line
to allow for the maximum utilization of the separation space between
structures.
Service Residential District:
Two attached or detached single family residences are provided for in
their district. Most likely these would be occupied by the owner(s)
or manager(s) of the Equestrian facility.
A bed and breakfast inn and restaurant are allowed as a special use
within the District. Given the unique quality of Preshana Farms and
the numerous guests and visitors that will frequent the facility, the
bed and breakfast inn will be a very complimentary use.
The Preshana Farm P.U.D. satisfies a series of sound planning concepts from
the County's standpoints.
1. Convenient vehicular access 1/4 mile from Highway 82 at a
channelized intersection.
2. It places a new development adjacent to existing development with
the potential for joint utilization of utility systems.
3. It preserves the natural character and agricultural uses of the
site. The general public will continue to benefit from the visual
and open space quality of the site much as it does now.
4. The equestrian center is a clean commercial industry which is a
positive economic activity for the area.
5. The character of the project and its location will combine to
provide high tax revenues to the county with the minimum impacts
on county services.
In summary, Preshana Farm P.U.D. will create minimal negative impacts while
preserving the natural character of a unique site to the benefit of the
public.
•
•
•
UTILITY SERVICES
It is the desire of Preshana Farms that domestic water service and
wastewater treatment be provided through ioint agreements with
existing utility systems in the area. Preliminary discussions have
been initiated, but no agreements have been identified. If such
agreements cannot be achieved, Preshana Farms would develop its own
waste water treatment facility and domestic water well and storage
facility. It is anticipated any required water rights would be
purchased from the Basalt Water Conservancy District. The farm
property does have more than adaquate water rights to accommodate the
development if this were determined to be desirable. The engineer's
statement, contained in this application, contains more detailed
information regarding utilities, drainage and water rights.
SCHOOL DEDICATION:
The Preshana Farm property does not contain adaquate acreage or
generate enough school impact to consider the dedication of a school
site. The project will make a cash, in lieu of payment, to the School
District, as provided for by the R.E.1 Board Policy.
COVENANTS:
To further assure the development and continuation of the Preshana Farm P.U.D.
as a high quality residential area, protective covenants will be recorded
along with the final platting of the P.U.D.. Following are topics of
particular importance to be included in the covenants. A preliminary draft of
these covenants will be provided to the County Planning Department with a
preliminary plan submittal.
1. Architectural Committee:
--Building siting
--Site and structural design
--Landscaping
--Fencing restrictions
2. Lot Use Restrictions:
--Residential structure
--Garage/storage structure
--Use of Open Space area
3. Animals
--No horses or livestock on lot
--Dog leashing requirement
•
c/)
•
•
•
•
OOL 4VO1 '03
r
J
OJOV/s}!un 99
—I —I
O O
D D
r r
0
D m
O r-
O
Z c
_Z
() —I
(n
O
O
O
0
Ut
(0
1
1
co
N
O N
N
0)
01 0
-.
W O O O
.a) Zo cr)
Cn
rn CO v ry
N co
CC)
W N CTS
0
n
c
(n
D
0
rn
0
C
XHVININIlls
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4. Underground Utilities Required:
5. Vehicle Control:
--Limitations on recreational vehicle storage
6. General Site Maintenance:
7. Noxious Activities:
8. Easements:
9. Signs:
10. Temporary Structures:
b:pfpud2
Revised 8-2-89
i
. `
,/ AfA, , - --- 1
1 c J' / pir�aot .e..n�n,e / \ / / 1 /
// 1 • • • 1 • • • / / 1/
/I
/,1/ 1 1 /•
? ; 1/ r / i
1 / 1
81 1Cfl / / / ' // / .l1 1
\ - 7 IY /
_,/.� \ 1
— %.•/ / 7
\ 11 • / / 1/
11 / / �,
111 / /• / ,II/
1
1 ./ / 1 , 1
ill 1•4./ /' / / / /
,'.j �
/
I11 1. , F,A-
, // / /
/ g // / � i II !
. / ► / - / / i� r
/ / � 1 1
►— / , 1
111 / (� /� /� // 1 / L/.
/ '• /yyJ� ��' / / / /
/' •I•- / / / / / / /' �t // —I 7
/•• . // // / /
/, •/l 1i
1 I t
1 / / / /! '
1 �'� // / / 1 // • 1
1 11•
// / / / ;
i
1 / I
/
/ / 1 i
�� 1 \ '' 1 1 •I1
I
/ / 1 1 .111
CD / 1 1 ,•
1 I. /
, l I
t7�� 1 7, :.,, ,/
tv/
oot odoa •oo
/
OO L avow '00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PRESHANA FARM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
LAND USE SUMMARY Revised 8-02-89
DWELLING ACRES % OF
UNITS PUD
Open Space District 30.6 52.85
EQUESTRIAN CENTER DIST.(Employee Housing) 10 10.2 17.62
SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT 15 10.9 18.83
CLUSTER HOUSING DISTRICT 11 3.6 6.22
SERVTCE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DWELLTNG UNITS 2 2.6 4.49
LODGING UNITS 10
(by Special Use Review)
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS
TOTAL LODGING UNITS .
GROSS DENSITY(Dwelling Units) .66 Units/Acre
38 57.9
10
100.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PRESHANA FARM PUD
ZONE REGULATIONS
8-23-89
SECTION I.
A. To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zoning
Resolution, Garfield County, Colorado and particularly, Section 4.00
of that title, as amended, the Preshana Farm Planned Unit Development
Zoning District is further divided into the following Zone District
Classifications:
- Open Space District
- Equestrian Center District
- Single Family District
- Cluster Housing District
- Service Residential District
B. The boundaries of these districts shall be located as shown on the
Preshana Farm P.U.D. Plan,
Section II. Open Space District
A. Uses, by Right:
Agricultural use including farm, garden, nursery, orchards, ranch and
customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure
.of animals or property employeed in any of the above uses.
Open Space
Equestrian activities including public equestrian events addended by
less than 300 spectators.
Water impoundments.
B. Uses, Conditional:
None
C. Uses, Special:
Public Events - Greater than 300 spectators.
•
•
•
Page 2
Preshana Farm PUD
Zone Regulations
Domestic Water Storage Structure
Wastewater Treatment Facility.
D. Minimum Lot Area:
None
E. Maximum Lot Coverage:
None
F. Minimum Setback:
Front Yard 20 Feet
Rear Yard 20 Feet
Side Yard 20 Feet
G. Maximum Building Height:
• 25 foot
Section III. Equestrian Center District
A. Uses, By Right:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Agricultural used including farm, garden, nursery, orchards, ranch and
customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure
of persons, animals or property employed in any of the above uses.
Single family, two-family, multi -family dwelling, for persons employed
on the premises.
Riding Stable
Tack Shop
Veterinary Clinic
Kennel
Day Nursery, Camp, and School.
B. Uses, Conditional:
None
C. Uses, Special:
Domestic Water Storage Structure.
Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Page 3
Preshana Farm PUD
Zone Regulations
D. Minimum Lot Area:
None
E. Maximum Lot Coverage:
None
F. Minimum Setback:
Front yard 25 Feet
Rear Yard 25 Feet
Side Yard 25 Feet
G. Maximum Building Height:
25 Feet
H. Off -Street Parking:
Single Family Dwelling - 2 parking spaces.
Two -Family & Multi -Family Dwelling - 1-1/2 parking spaces.
Section IV. Single Family District
A. Uses, y Ric ht:
Single family dwelling and customary accessory uses including
buildings for the enclosure of property accessory to the use of the
lot for residential purposes and fences, hedges, gardens, and walls
and similar landscape features. No animals shall be kept on a lot
except for dogs and cats, which may be kept for non-commercial
purposes.
Park, open space
Water impoundments
Live-in maids and caretakers quarters when attached to the primary
residence on the lot and not exceeding 650 square feet in floor area
Community Recreation Facilities for use of Preshana Farm PUD residents
and guests.
B. Uses, Conditional:
None
C. Uses, Special:
Wastewater Treatment Facility
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Page 4
Preshana Farm PUD
Zone Regulations
D. Minimum Lot Area:
14,000 square feet
E. Maximum Lot Coverage:
60%
F. Minimum Setbacks:
Front Yard 20 Feet
Rear Yard 20 Feet
Side Yard 20 Feet
G. Maximum Height of Buildings:
27 feet
H. Off -Street Parking:
Four parking spaces per single family dwelling unit.
One parking space per caretaker unit.
The Community Recreation Facility shall provide a minimum of six
parking spaces.
Section V. Cluster Housing District
A. Uses, By Right:
Single family and two family dwellings and customary accessory uses
including buildings for the enclosure of property accessory to the use
of the lot for residential purposes and fences, hedges, gardens; and
walls and similar landscape features. No animals shall be kept on a
lot except for dogs and cats, which may be kept for non-commercial
purposes.
Park, open space
Water impoundments
B. Uses, Conditional:
None
C. Uses, Special:
None
D. Minimum Lot Area:
5,000 square feet
•
•
•
•
•
s
•
•
Page 5
Preshana Farm PUD
Zone Regulations
E. Maximum Lot Coverage:
60%
F. Minimum Setbacks:
As shown on the Preshana Farm Final Plat
G. Maximum Height of Buildings:
27 feet
H. Off -Street Parking:
Two Parking Spaces/Dwelling Unit
Section VI. Service Residential District
A. Uses, By Right:
Single family and two family dwellings and customary accessory uses
including buildings for the enclosure of property accessory to the use
of the lot for residential purposes and fences, hedges, gardens, and
walls and similar landscape features. No animals shall be kept on a
lot except for dogs and cats, which may be kept for non-commercial
purposes.
B. Uses, Conditional:
None
C. Uses, Spcial:
Bed and Breakfast Inn - (Maximum 10 rooms)
Restaurant (Maximum Seating: 80)
D. Minimum Lot Area:
15,000 square feet
E. Maximum Lot Coverag:
60%
F. Minimum Setbacks Frcrn Lodging District Boundaries:
Front Yard 20 Feet
Rear Yard 20 Feet
Side Yard 20 Feet
• Page 6
Preshana Farm PUD
Zone Regulations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
G. Maximum Height of Buildings:
25 feet
H. Off -Street Parking:
Lodging Unit - 1
Restaurant - 1
Single Family Dwelling - 2
Two Family Dwelling - 1
Revised 08-23-89
b:pfzr8-23
parking space/unit
space/4 seats
parking spaces
1/2 parking spaces.
•
•
•
•
April 7, 1989
Board of County Commissioners
Garfield County, Colorado
P.O. Box 640
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Preshana Farm Proposed Development
HCE Job No. 9010.001
Dear Commissioners:
The following information is meant to provide some of the
• information required for the Sketch Plan Submittal for the above
referenced project.
There does not appear to be any natural hazards affecting the area
proposed to be developed. The floodplains of the Roaring Fork
River and Blue Creek lie southerly of the development, the
• floodplain infringes slightly onto the southern edge of the
property in the area marked "greenbelt," however, it does not
affect any of the area proposed to be developed.
Water service shall be provided by a central system, and service
is anticipated to be provided by the existing system at the Ranch
• at Roaring Fork, which is adjacent to this development. Per
information from their engineer, the Ranch at Roaring Fork has
sufficient physical supply to serve both itself and Preshana
Farm. The existing storage tank is also adequately sized to serve
both. Note that no agreement is currently in place for the Ranch
at Roaring Fork to provide any service, even though this is the
• preferred alternative. However, if no reasonable agreement can be
reached, Preshana Farm is prepared to develop their own well based
system using water purchased from the Basalt Water Conservancy
District.
•
• Suite 205, Village Plaza • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Telephone 303-945-8676
•
•
•
•
•
•
Board of County Commissioners
Page 2
April 7, 1989
The preferred alternative for sewage treatment is also to make use
of the existing waste water treatment plant at the Ranch at
Roaring Fork. However, modifications and additions will be
necessary to the existing treatment system to accommodate the
additional load. Therefore, again, an agreement would need to be
reached on the necessary improvements and their associated cost.
If a reasonable agreement cannot be reached, Preshana Farm is
prepared to construct their own small sewage treatment plant.
Other utilities anticipated to serve this project are as follows:
Holy Cross Electric Association
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
U.S. West Direct (telephone)
A copy of a soils report, which was completed for a previously
proposed development on this same property, is included in the
material submitted with this package.
Sincerely yours,
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.
Tim thy P. Beck, P.E.
Pro] ; ct Manager
• TPB:rjm
Enclosure
•
•
•
•
•
•
Lincoln DeVore
1000 West Fillmore St.
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907
(303) 632-3593
Home Office
Land Design
Village Plaza, Suite 208
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Ron Liston
Re:
Gentlemen:
April 4, 1979
GENERAL & ENGINEERING
GEOLOGY & SOILS
ST. FINBAR PROPERTY
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Transmitted herewith is a report concerning the general and
engineering geology and soils of the proposed development
• located at the St. Finbar Property, in Garfield County, Colorado.
•
•
Respectfully submitted,
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY, INC
By:
Robert L. Bass
Civil Engineer
By: 11/
Mael T. Weaver
Professional Geologist
RLB & MTW/vfb
LDTL Job No. GS -987
`2700 Highway 50 West
Pueblo, Colo 81003
'303) 546.1150
•
P.O. Box 1427
Glenwood Springs, Colo 81601
(303) 945-6020
109 Rosemont Plaza
Montrose, Colo 81401
(303) 249-7838
Reviewed y George D. Morris
Professional Engineer
P.O. Box 1882
Grand Junction, Colo 81501
(303) 242-8968
P.O. Box 1643
Rock Springs, Wyo 82901
(307) 382-2649
INTRODUCTION
The content of this report is a
geological site evaluation and subsurface soils investigation
with engineering recommendations for a 142 acre parcel of
• land located in the west half of Section 31, Township 7
South, Range 87 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Gar-
field County, Colorado. The site lies between Higha:ay 82
• and the Roaring Fork River, just south of the Catherine
Store. A 52 acre tract along Highway 82 is proposed to be
left as meadow and pastureland and the remainder of the site
to be subdivided into single and/or multiple family dwellings.
It is our understanding that central water supply and
septic disposal are to be supplied to the property by an ex-
tension of the system at the Ranch at the Roaring Fork.
Vegetation consists of large
cottonwoods along braided stream drainages with many willows,
• elms and oak. Mountain grasses, shrubs and other low herbals
are abundant. The site is predominately level and con-
sists of terrace and river alluvial deposits of the Roar-
• ing Fork River. Several drainages and irrigation ditches
cross the site in a westerly direction.
•
•
Cu 1CLUSTO1\1 ::171) RECOMNDTAf2pr
41 Since the magnitude and nature
of the proposed foundation loads are not precisely known
to the Laboratory at this time the recommendations contained
herein must be quite general in nature. Any special loads
or unusual design conditions should be reported to the Lab-
oratory so that changes in these recommendations may be made
41 if necessary. However based upon our analysis of the soil
conditions and project characteristics previously outlined
the following recommendations are made.
a It is our recommendation that
shallow foundation systemsconsisting of continuous-foundations
beneath bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath
• columns and other points of concentrated load be used to
carry the weight of the proposed structures. The presence of
shallow ground water will necessitate special consideration
41 in foundation design and this will be discussed in this
section. Foundations which rest on the alluvial gravels of
Soil Type No. 2 may be proportioned on basis of a maximum
41 allowable bearing capacity of 3000 psf with no minimum dead-
load pressure required. The bottoms of foundations should be
located a minimum of 3.5 feet below finished grade or greater
4 if dicated by local building codes, for frost protection.
Obviously the presence of ground
water at a relatively shallow depth will create difficulties
• in the installation and performance of basement type found-
ation systems. Therefore, basements are not recommended for
this site. A crawl space type frame floor or a slab on grade
could be used on this site providing special precautions
axe taken. If :i ci „w1',pace type foundat:i on i used it in
• recommended that_ the interior of the crawl space be backfilled
to an elevation equal to or greater than the finished exterior
grade in order to minimize the possibility for standing water
• in the crawl space. It would then be necessary of course, to
construct the floor a sufficient distance above this backfill
to provide access if required, and to satisfy any building
• codes requirements.
If a slab on grade type of foundation
is used the floor slabs should be placed above a capillary
• break consisting of a clean compacted gravel laver of approx-
imately 6 inches in thickness. It is recommended that the
bottom of this capillary break layer be located at or above
• the finished exterior grade elevation. The capillary break
should be provided with a free drainage outlet to the exter-
ior so as not to serve as a water trap beneath the floor
• slabs. A vapor barrier is recommended beneath all floor
slabs between the slab and the capillary break.
Floor slabs shoul:l be constructed
• in such a manner that they act independently of columns and
bearing walls. Additionally, concrete floor slabs on grade
should be placed in sections no greater than 25 feet on a
• side. Deep construction or contraction joints could be
placed at these lines to facilitate even breakage. This will
help reduce any unsightly cracking which could be caused
• from differential movement of slabs. It is recommended that
any topsoil material and any of the soft, silty clays of Soil
Type No. 1 which are located in the slab area be completely
• removed and replaced with a suitable backfill compacted to
•
at least 9j% of the maximum stLind:frd iroctc,r dry Oensity,
• ASTM D-698.
11: is r-ecoirtnc.nded that the pro-
posed foundation systems be well balanced. Exterior bearing
• wall pressures should be balanced to within + 500 psf around
the entire structure. Isolated interior footings should be
designed for unit loads of about 200 psf less than the
• average of those selected for the exterior walls. The cri-
teria for..this balance will depend somewhat upon the nature
of the structure. Single -story slab on grade structures may
• be balanced on the basis of deadload only. Other types of
structures should be blanced on the basis of deadload
plus approximately one-half the live load.
• Any stemwalls for continuous
footings should be designed as grade beams capable of sf an-
ning at least 12 feet. The horizontal reinforcement requir-
• ed for this design should be placed continuously around
the building with no gaps or b.rea .s in the reinforcingg ._ teel
J
unless specially deignad. Beans should a reinforced at
both top and bottom with the majority of the reinforcement
being located at the bottom of the beam. Where stemwalls
are placed beneath interior foundation loads they should of
course, be designed according to the criteria given above
and should be rigidly interconnected with the exterior
foundation walls.
•
•
t
Adequate drainage must be pro-
vided in the foundation area both during and after con-
struction to prevent the ponding of water. The ground
surface around the building should be graded such that
surface water will be crried quick.1, a:.1y from the structure.
• Minimum gradient within 10 feet of ..-iy structure will depend
upor, surface landscaping. Bare or paved teas should have
a minimum gradient of 2%, while landscaped areas should have
• a minimum gradient of 5%. Roof drains, if used, should be
carried across all backfilled areas and dischargee3 well
away from the structure. The overall drainage pattern should
• be such that water directed away from one structure is not
directed against an adjacent structure.
The presence of ground water
at shallow depth may create some difficulties in the in-
stallation of foundations and dewatering techniques inay
be necessary. Typical dewatering techniques would include
• well points, drainage ditches, sump pits with pumps, and
deep wells. Probably the most practical dewatering system
for this particular site would be the use of sump pits
• with pumps. Basically this would involve placing several
pits or low areas in the foun.c9;; Bio: e •inn and eremoving
water from these pits by pu:pping. The nuiTb_f and size of
• sump pits required for any given structure and the necessary
capacity for pumps are dependent upon many factors and are
beyond the scope of this report. Regardless of the type of
• dewatering system used, it will be necessary to remove the
water from the excavation for sufficient periods of time to
permit proper grading of the fooundation soil, placement of
concrete and placement of backfill around foundations.
Backfill around the proposed stru-
cture and in utility trenches leading to the structure should
be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor
dry density, ASTM D-698. Backfill on the interior of the
•
Sl.LU4l,l1LE'. W1111.:11 :.111 i)C1'0CaLea U(_nC atn ZJ.00r Slabs Should
be compacted to at least 95% of the lt•a::] It t1Ii, Proctol dry
density. The native :-oils on this site will be suitable
for this backfill, with the exception of any topsoil
• materials or debris. Backfill should be placed in lifts
not to exceed 6 inches compacted thickness and at a mois-
ture content of approximately equal to the Proctor optimum
moisture content + 2%. All material in excess of 6 inches
40
diameter should be removed from backfill prior to place-
ment. Backfill should be compacted to the required density
by mechanical means. No water flooding techniques of any
type should be used in the placement of fill on this site.
Any topsoil or debris should be
removed from the construction area prior to beginning of
construction of foundations. Additionally, should any poc-
kets of debris, organic material or otherwise unsuitable mat-
erial encountered at foundation level, these materials should
•
be removed and replaced with backfill co;r:_,acted to 95% of the
:r&a_rimum Proctor clry density, usin=: the procedures previously
outlined.
•
The open foundaton excavation should
be inspected prior to the construction of forms or placement
• of concrete to establish that proper design bearing material
has been reached and that no debris, soft spots or other
unsuitable materials are located within the foundation area.
• The silty clay of Soil Type No.1
was noted to contain sulfates in detrimental quantities.
Additionally, ground water in this area can be expected to
carry significant quantities of sulfates. For these reasons
a sulfate resistant cement, such as Type II Cement is re-
commended for all concrete which will be in contact with
•
•
•
•
the :;oi] . Under no circumstances hculd
ever be added to a Type II Current, in the event that Type
II Cement is difficult to obtain a Type I Cement may be
used providing the concrete is separated from the soil by
water resistant membranes.
It is believed that all pertinent
points concerning the subsurface soils on this site have
been covered in this report. If soil types and conditions
other than those outlined herein are noted during construc-
tion on this site, these should be reported to the Laboratory
so that changes and recommendations may be made if necessary.
Should questions arise or further information be desired
please feel free to contact the Laboratory.
•
7-•'•^-•-•
? e
.f♦ iJ '( .• >~ ✓` .�'L �-� � yam. ✓-•,.Y"-^r.'. �•-ri-r •'1^ Y' Yom.. N.. ✓' r it- Y � v:x�v��yr:.»"1.r3:�. j[T�:
•.....5�''b-'� ''r„�s•ti;..-.�.. •-,•tea-Lrr2.`.- .� •r .f'e �`�-'„•', '�'-^. •'.-.. ^�.w �'•,.. �''�•- f- _..-.�-,x .., .5"L'i•,--A :y \S:�ji���
•
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY
r•: fir. +,
• •
-7)/Y7\4_ ir4-1 TITIF
GUARANTY COMPANY
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM•COVERAGE CONTAINED IN
SCHEDULE. B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas
corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not
exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unrnarketability of the title;
4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land.
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only
to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its
duly authorized officers as of the Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
Chairman of the
Countersigned:
.4,a,T ,1,I 1 E3"
GUARANTY c.ir.rt•:tN5•
•
t'1Of 18
gv�'e`rt'"ltft of Glenw i Springs, Inc.
CompaittOX 430, Glenwood Springs, CO 81502
•• •
•
•
• I•
t •
City, State
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters cre expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pa;• loss or dcmaae, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restr.cHg,
.coloring, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or
hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or o change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
s_-cn; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these lawns, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a
ncr:e of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation cr alleged violation affecting the land has been
recorded in the public records et Dote of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or o notice of a defect, hen
cr encumbrance resulting from o violction or alleged violation effecting the lard has been record'd in the public records Dote of Policy,
Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
.cv: • ce any taking which hes c,curred prior to Date of Policy ,,,hich would be binding on the rights ci o purchaser for value without knowledge.
cts, rens, encu :brance-s. adverse claims cr other matters:
.r oted, suffered, css:mid or agreed to ^i the insured ci:::ina, t
rot known to the Compony, not recorded n the pebt, r_ccrds at Dote of ?c!icy, but known to the insured claimant end not disciosed in writing to
..rarar•y by the insured claimant prior tc the dote the in:urnd claimant beta,' an insured under this policy;
rsu!ting in no !os: or c..... tc to the in:cred cloi:r,cnt;
or u. c ed s.,,-..:1uent to Cat; of Policy; cr
resui' .'c in les :.r der, viiich w: c,:ld not he':e been sutoin .:! if rho ;• . .: ,i c!cimcrni !sod !.o :; vo!ue for the estate or interest insured by his
•
i'
•
•
•
rt.
. r)
• �i
RLH/RM
SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 15577-G Policy No.: 0-9941-37587
Date of Policy:
September 03, 1988 At 4:18 P. M Amount of Insurance: $ 8 7 5 , 000.00
• 1. Name of Insured:
LANA TRETTIN AND HENRY TETT zr, AS JOINT TENANTS
•
•
2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is:
FEE SIMPLE
Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in:
LANA rr TT 1`AND HENRY TRETm ! _S JOTNT TE dAT8.�
4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
SET 72,G75 2..
•
II•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PRESHANA FARMS, DA'Z'ED JULY, 17, 1989
Russell C. & Clare C. Cutter
P.O. Box 3563
Grand Junction, CO 81502
Jupiter Enterprises
c/o Peter VanDomelen
315 East Hyman Ave.
Aspen, CO 81611
Glenwood Industrial Bank
c/o John A. & Susan K. Tindall
P.O. Box 2014
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
William J. & Jayne M. Gilligan
3222 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
Kmoco Oil Co.
c/o Lael E. & Eddie V. Hughes
3844 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
Mary Ann Hyde
P.O. Box 1557
Aspen, CO 81612
Stanley Lyle & Sarah K. Oliver
15524 Hwy 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Duanne E. & Martha Shilling
15452 Hwy. 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Trude Peet
ATTN: G.L. Peet Revocable Trust #26704-1
First Trust Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 64704
St. Paul, Minn. 55164-0704
Ranch At Roaring Fork
0395 Stagecoach Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
Leonard A & Jean A. Barnes
0900 El Jebel Road
El Jebel, CO 81628
Michael T. & Luanne D. Costanzo
0477 Stagecoach Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
•
•
•
cS2Q7/ OCAT and q/VarkE7, LlnC.
Reg. Land Surveyors and Engineers
811 Colorado Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(303) 945-8664
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situated in a portion of Lots 3, 4, 6, 17, 18 and 19 of
Section 31, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian,
County of Garfield, State of Colorado, said parcel being more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the Witness Corner to the Northeast Corner of said Section 31, a
stone in place; thence S.60°01'05"W. 2350.39 feet to the Southeast Corner of
Reception No. 279416, also being a point on the westerly right-of-way of County
• Road No. 100, a rebar and cap L.S. No. 10732 in place, the True Point of
Beginning; thence S.00°11'29"W. along said westerly right-of-way 827.14 feet to
a rebar and cap L.S. No. 10732 in place; thence continuing along said westerly
right-of-way S.03°56'29"W. 117.74 feet to a rebar and cap L. S. No. 10732 in
place; thence continuing along said westerly right-of-way S.11°37'27"W. 299.44
feet; thence leaving said westerly right-of-way N.72°41'32"W. along a line
being northerly of Blue Creek 136.34 feet; thence continuing along a line being
northerly of Blue Creek N.77°44'52"W. 317.09 feet; thence continuing along a
line being northerly of Blue Creek N.62°48'46"W. 375.98 feet; thence continuing
along a line being northerly of Blue Creek N.41°30'29"W. 89.74 feet; thence
continuing along a line being northerly of Blue Creek N.81°01'17"W. 285.92
feet; thence N.13°12'20"E. 120.00 feet to a point in an existing fence; thence
N.76°47'40"W. along said existing fence 1038.73 feet to a point on the easterly
line of Parcel B of Reception No. 375658 (from whence rebar and cap L.S. No.
10732 bears S.00°00'18"W. 263.28 feet); thence N.00°00'18"E. along said
easterly line 1013.61 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way of Colorado
State Highway No. 82 as evidenced by existing right-of-way monuments and the
existing centerline (whence a rebar and cap L.S. No. 3317 bears S.00°00'18"W.
3.99 feet); thence S.79°56'55"E. along said southerly right-of-way 1982.77
feet; thence S.10°30'58"W. along the easterly line of said Reception No. 279416
133.47 feet to a rebar and cap L.S. No. 10732 in place; thence S.79°44'32"E.
along the southerly line of said Reception No. 279416 247.29 feet to the True
Point of Beginning; said parcel containing 57.889 acres, more or less.
Together with a perpetual easement being a portion of Parcel "B" shown in
Reception No. 375658 situated in a portion of Lot 17 of Section 31, Township 7
South, Range 87 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State
of Colorado; said easment being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Witness Corner to the Northeast Corner of said Section 31, a
stone in place; thence S.81°10'28"W. 4257.59 feet to a point on the southerly
right-of-way of State Highway No. 82, the True Point of Beginning; thence
S.00°00'18"W. along the easterly line of said Parcel "B" 1013.61 feet to a
point on an existing fence; thence N.76°47'40"W. along said fence 67.27 feet to
a point on the westerly line of said Parcel "B"; thence N.00°07'35"E. along
said westerly line 1009.48 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way of
said State Highway No. 82; thence S.79°56'55"E. along said southerly right-of-
way 64.35 feet to the True Point of Beginning; said easement containing 1.496
acres, more or less.
December 2, 1987