Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit't �y GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 No. 7666 Job Address 7r /' t k (I Nature of Work Use of Buildin Owner Building Permit $ to 3S Contractor Amount of Permits 01.8 .9 Dat fil26.-_,,4_,04--b-c-e-= 6W-71 reA444---k„6,e_e_:-= 87. as Clerk 'GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIEID COUNTY (OLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 9454212 Applicant to complete numbered Ewes only. PERMIT NO. loBADDRESS: /2 W 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LOT No. BLOCK NO. """ :V; C\ \I. GnOCrh vsZ:( C\'<'\ \ ARCPUTICIVINCOMIlla PaDISIMI 766c, INSPECTION L.LNE: (970) 945-9159 PARCEUSCHEDUiLE NO. A -kg c C SUBDIVISIONIEX MPT/ON9O ) v 1‘L. p A R` `cut cormiN7; to �L�4 L/C LICN e)eagallo IMO= WPM: Con ecomo►AYAmer owam swam bloom LS I WM/AIMOf llCaZ: $ • •OC1ALC0CIM' ; aimeu Gera RAN mrALwmea 1/7..C4/ I / / ! Pi 1, NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT 1S REQUIRED AND NMI DE 1SSCAID BT ThE LTATE OF. COLORADO. Tesla plINIATRoot= NULL AND VOID IIT WORK OR CONS7RUCTTONAUI IORZED IS Nor COWEN= WITHIN 1W DAYS, OR IP CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUMMED CRABA? DTORAPERIODOFISODAYSATANYTIME "SJ RS OOI�QsIE,NlCBD. - .: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMNED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME 10 BE TRUE AMID courser. AIL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THE TYPE OF WORK WEL BE corm= WIIHWHEIBEIL TICIIISED MEDI OR NOT. "THE r r CF A PERMIT + • MOM TO SIVE4.1 AUTHORITY TO • t,y, CANCIL • : + • ' ANY O1 L 1 6 shoo. MtOrem yerl 4k- ' 11Mt. A�ov.uDw PDcgt. POC: CROUP: 3 f DATE PERMIT t CONST: TYPIC: -r • -F SETBACKS: i. .+ ,i MANLI. : . ASI EDS NO. A FEW e', 17° cv PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR ANDOR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND BMW/CATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY TILE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED B' GARP/MD COUNTY PURSUANT TO ALRHORTIY GIVEN 1N 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER ACRES/ THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULL' OOMPLIRD WTTH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OP 1H8 ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, TIM PST MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANO, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR P7t0 PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLAT7(Y OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS IURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILTTEis ORLIABLrIIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY wall 11-1E ARCHITECT. DESIGNER BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND 1N �T OF THE OWNERS INTERE OrlaRts vo) I HEREBY ACICNOWL.EDOE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL) The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2. Permanent address assigned by the Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road. 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing. 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot & cold running, water, . . floors and walls finished an a privacy door. 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guardrails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements. 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building. 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e., weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. * * * * CANNOT OCCUPY CR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # '16.6..(o /21/#)4' Signature Date prmtcond.Ist 13`5 4? c c ass f3lSK 01 c4) = 12s555, gODA /8'-(11) ; ?AM, . 4TY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 QQeAR) fekkel RPX.2 PPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for 119( °S)-d°JY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including 1Nr, W CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check list at time of application for a permit. 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check list at time of application for a permit. 1 r, January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom ofthe footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All ofthe above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lines, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes }( 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams r water courses? Yes 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the propert, y,? Yes XJ 4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? 1 Yes L 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clances required between wood and earth? Yes 2 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's and soffits? Yes 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes /\ 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof r ers or joists or trusses? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours? Yes y 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado P ase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code hapter 37? Yes No l - 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes /11 No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and v ntilation for all habitable rooms? Yes . i No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walldng surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated Qn,the plan? Yes No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with an plat notes and/or covenants Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectur committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 20. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 1S No If no -Explain: 21. Have two complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 22. Do you Yes stand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio code requirements? Yes No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspectio the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are requiredprior to the appl tion of these changes? Yes No 4 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the 'Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay yo inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupan d occupancy of the building? Yes No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the prof complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. si Phone: 3((days); Project Name: CJjqL Project Address: date 6-9 (evenings) i t,,,/ (A)ck (Ho Ai* f e.r v;114,4., 5 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 1 /00 6 a 0 \ ‘,::) CCI tl)91 r 3 to E >,- g U at'0 o cS c V e vi •c0 0 00 8 3 County Road (Note the Road Number and Name) n 1994 Building Code Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the aides Snowload: 401bs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. /sq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches -30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowload-imposed by snow) GARFIELD COUNTY Building and Planning Notice of Clarification It is the interpretation of this department that the provisions of UBC Section 302.4, Exception Number 3, also applies to openings for access to attic space above a U occupancy. The access door in the ceiling of a garage must be self closing, tight fitting, solid wood door, 1-3/8ths inches thick, or have a 20 minute fire protection rating or the one hour fire separation wall between the garage and the dwelling must extend above the ceiling, all the way to the roof. Arno Ehlers Chief Building Official 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/235-7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS — GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junction, CO 81505 April 19, 2000 Dustin & Stacey Church PO Box 573 Rifle, CO 81650 Re: Subsurface Soils Exploration 12 Willowview Way, Battlement Mesa, CO TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a geotechnical exploratory program at the above referenced site. Two shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the proposed building pad by the client. Exploration pit # 1 was placed on the east side of the proposed building pad and Exploration pit # 2 was placed in the central portion ofthe building lot. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of 8 to 8 '/s feet below the original ground surface. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on 3-28-00. The purpose of these pits were to determine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an alluvial debris -fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east southeast, along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt and silty day in the finer portions and gravely silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles and boulders in the coarser portions. Many strata of the finer -grained soils arc of low to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsible) properties. The primary soil type encountered on this site was classified as a silty (ML) under the Unified Classification System. Some gravels and boulders were encountered in the lower 1 to 2 feet of both exploration pits. These soils are very stratified, representing several ancient debris flow events. This material is nonplastic, of moderate permeability, and was encountered in a low to medium density, dry to slightly moist condition. This material will consolidate collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. One Dimensional Consolidation tests using the Consolidation Apparatus, ASTM D-2435, were performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the soil. Upon test saturation, collapse of 2.17 was measured, with 5.65% total consolidation occurring at an applied load of 2050 psf. Upon further test loading, 8.58% consolidation occurred at an applied load of 4100 psf. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this soil in the native condition cannot be assigned due to the collapsible characteristics. If these soils are over excavated a minimum of 18 inches, the subgrade soils water conditioned, compacted and the native soils replaced as a water conditioned structural fill in accordance with recommendations contained in this report, a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 1800 psf, with 150 psf minimum dead load pressure may be realized. Man-made Fill., The soils encountered in the exploration pits appear to be native to the site. All building foundations must penetrate any man-made fills which are present at the site at this time, as well as any fills which result from the excavation process. Careful examination of the open excavation will be necessary to determine the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior Dustin & Stacey Church Subsurface Soils Exploration, 12 Willowview Way, Battlement Mesa, CO April 19, 2000 Page 2 to the placement of concrete to establish that materials of proper design bearing capacity have been exposed and that no soft spots or debris are present in the foundation area. A 24 hour notice is required for all field examinations to enable Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide service when needed. Soil Moisture Conditions: The soils at foundation level in the original excavation were found to be dry to damp. No free water was noted in the excavation. Some moisture was added to the soils in the excavation by the contractor in order to obtain proper compaction. Foundation Type Recommended; Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, underlain by a minimum of 18 inches of structural fill, placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1800 psf maximum. A minimum bearing of 150 psf is recommended. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within + or - 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single -story, slab -on -grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one half live load, for up to three stories. A properly designed shallow foundation system of the standard continuous spread footing and stem wall type, placed on a minimum of 18 inches of properly compacted structural fill, based upon the recommendations provided in this report has been prepared by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, a copy of that design is attached. The foundation system must be constructed in strict compliance with our plans and specifications, with no alterations or deviations allowed unless prior approval is first obtained from this office. Structural FilVSoil improvement: For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fill is recommended to replace the Upper Metastable Soils. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. The existing metastable soils should be removed to a depth of 18 inches below the proposed bottom footing elevation. The excavation/fill width is to be at least 30" wider than the Footing/Stemwall in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln-DeVore to ensure that an adequate over excavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. At the specific direction of the Geotechnical Engineer, it may be appropriate to extensively water soak the over - excavated portion of the site for up to 7 days, prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and not allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. Dustin & Stacey Church Subsurface Soils Exploration, 12 Willowview Way, Battlement Mesa, CO April 19, 2000 Page 3 Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non -expansive, non -free draining man-made structural fill be imported to the site. Non -Expansive, native soils may be utilized and are strongly recommended as structural fill. The upper 6" to 12"(minimum) ofthe fill is to be a sandy gravel (minus 3/4" & GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (minus 3/4" & SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the over excavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of 90% of the soils maximum Modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ± 2%). The structural fill material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2 foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not required for this foundation design. Reinforcina: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 14 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) ofthe soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 50 pcf would be appropriate for the native soils. The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. Floor Slabs: Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ±2%. Drainage and Grading;. Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts Dustin & Stacey Church Subsurface Soils Exploration, 12 Willowview Way, Battlement Mesa, CO April 19, 2000 Page 4 be carried at least 10 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 15 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a 'dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no less than 10 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: * Metering the Irrigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping practices. * Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. * Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawispace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use ofa perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. backfill, To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density Dustin & Stacey Church Subsurface Soils Exploration, 12 Willowview Way, Battlement Mesa, CO April 19, 2000 Page 5 ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content ±2%). Cement Type: Type II, Type I-II or Type II -V cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type I1, Type I-II or Type II -V cement under any circumstances. Remarks., We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-101) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations delis report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Dustin & Stacey Church Subsurface Soils Exploration, 12 Willowview Way, Battlement Mesa, CO April 19, 2000 Page 6 Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. 400 R Gist: • 1A. 464 FQ i 30590 EC By: Edward M. Morris PE Principal Engineer GJLD Job # 87966 -GJ 1- SOILS DESCRIPTIONS arum Is *>K 0 0 111 is •100 :1 io 1 ill Iii •♦ •• 1•I e 0 • r • • LIENSIP11211 Topsoil - Organic Man -MEN Fla GW Gravel WeN-Graded GP Gravel Poory-Graded GM Silty Gravel GC Clayey Gravel SW Sand Well -Graded SP Sand Poorly -Graded SM Silty Sand SC Clayey Sand ML Sat Low -Plastic CL Slily Clay Low -Plast o OL Organic Silt & Clay Law -Plastic MH Sat High -Plastic CH Clay High -Plastic OH Organic Clay High -Plastic Pt Peat OW/GM Silty Gravel WW -Graded OW/GC Clayey Gravel Weil -Graded GP/GM Silly Gavel Poorly -Graded GP/GC Clayey Gravel Poory-Graded GMIGC Silty Clayey Gravel SW/SM Silty Sand Well -Graded • SW/SC Clayey Sand • Well -Graded SPISM Silty Sand Poorly -Graded SP/SC Clayey Sand PoortyGraded SM/SC Say Clayey Sand r 1 i `Ji CLIML Silty Clay -Clayey Silt Low -Plastic ROCK DESCRIPTIONS Hem X2911 TIo 1 NI dm r;r %!I//l . Sedimentary Rocks CONGLOMERATE SANDSTONE SILTSTONE SHALE CLAYSTONE MUDSTONE COAL LIMESTONE DOLOMITE MARLSTONE GYPSUM �' "+' Other Sedimentary Rocks _Imam Rocks 41 GRANITIC ROCKS -i. v.. GABBRO BASALT - RHYOLITE ....01,46,` TUFF & ASH FLOWS :'!:M' BRECCIA & Other Volcanics DIORITIC ROCKS N 7 ';4 Other Igneous Rocks •j Metamorphic Rock; 0 i GNEISS SCHIST PHYLLITE HORNFELS METAQUARTZITE MARBLE .-S�i, �� Other Metamorphic Rocks GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado SYMBOLS & NOTES area,. DESCRIPTION SPT Standard Penetration Drive 09112 ASTM D-1586 Disturbed Sample Numbers indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 12" into ground. CS 'California Lined Sampler' 09/12 Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Numbers Indicate 9 Slows To drive the Spoon 12" into ground. D&M 'Dames & Moore Lined Sampler 09112 Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Numbers Indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 12" into ground. ST Thin -Walled 'Shelby Tube ASTM D-1586 - 2.625"od 2.5" id 'Relatively Undisturbed Sample' BULK Wx 4 Disturbed, Bulk Sample ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Free Water Table Weathered Rock Formation Test Boring Location Test Pit Location Seismic or Resistivity Station Standard Penetration Drives are made by driving a standard 2" od, 1-5/8" Id Split Spoon Sampler into the ground by dropping a 140 lb. weight 30". No Thinwall Shoe Extension end the Sample is Disturbed. Modified Penetration Drives are made by driving a 2-1/2" od, 1.875" id California Spoon Sampler or a 3" od, 2-318" id California Spoon Sampler into the ground by dropping a 140 Ib. weight 30". No Thinwall Shoe Extension and the Sample is Disturbed. The Boring Logs show subsurface conditions at the dates and locations shown, and it is not warrented that they are representative of subsurface conditions at times and other locations. EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS Form No. OJI..DFORM-EXPL Drawn EMM Date 10-15-98 ��,' ��.•�• ���f����� `tea► 3-D TopoQuadi Copyright 01999Adam Y. rmouih, ME 040% ft Sok: ! : 5O.000 Dctrl: 124 Datum WC884 SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 12 Willowview Way Battlement Mesa, Colorado Stacey Church Rifle, Colorado Date 4-4-2000 Job No. 87966 -GJ Drawn AM DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 15 SOIL LOG _ TEST PIT NO. 1 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: EAST SIDE OF LOT SHEAR Torvane SOIL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION pef pcf % e °• O ° RED SILT, LOW -PLASTIC - "TOPSOIL" MOIST 88.3 87.4 4.1% 6.6% DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS SL. MOIST ST ML SILT, METASTABLE LOW DENSITY 5 COLLAPSIBLE STRATIFIED SULFATES GM SILTS with SANDS, GRAVELS and COBBLES UP TO 10" MOST GRAVELS and COBBLES ARE BASALT SL. MOIST LOW to MED. DENSITY 10 CARBONATES 15 ptn: .5' NO Free Water Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 3-28-2000 DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 15 SOIL LOG _ TEST PIT NO. 2 PIT LOCATION a ELEV.: CENTRAL AREA OF LOT SHEAR Torvana SOL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION pef pcf % { o o o o SILTY CLAY - "TOPSOIL" 86.9 4.7% DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS ML SILT, METASTABLE SL. MOIST ST 1 COLLAPSIBLE LOW DENSITY 5 STRATIFIED, OCC. LOW -PLASTIC SILT STRATA GM SILTS with SANDS, GRAVELS and COBBLES UP TO 3" DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS SL. MOIST LOW to MED. DENSITY 10 15� Plt Total Depth: Pit Excavated By: NO Free Water Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 3.28-2000 LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 12 Willowvlew Way Battlement Mesa, Colorado Stacey Church Rile, Colorado Date 4-4-2000 Job No. 87966 -GJ Drawn AM Soil Sample: Silt (ML) Geologic Origin: Debris Fan Deposits 1 1 Natural Water Content (w): 4.7% In -Place Density (pcf): Sample No.: I (Typical) Test by: LRS Test Pit: 2 Depth: 3' 86.9 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): COBBLE to GRAVEL 100 — I BAND SILT to OLA' 90 s0 1 70 so so 40 30 7 20 10 0 125 75 50 57.5 Sieve (mm) 5" 125 3" 75 25 1J 12.5 Particle Grain % Passing 9 5 4if 2 Size 0.85 (mm) 0.425 MOISTURE ASTM 0.15 Max. 0.9 Method: Dry 0.02 1 DENSIT Density 0.005 : 2" 50 1-112" 37.5 mum Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 1" 25 314" 19 Size gllowed $v Sampler 'R' Value CD 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: 112" 12.5 318" 9.5 2:1.02 Expansion © 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARM *4 4.75 #10 2 Standard Penetration (1 Unconfined Compressii #20 0.85 #40 0.425 100 CONSOLIDATION: Sample at 1 on 4' #100 0.15 #200 0.075 99 89.2 SULFATE SALTS: PERMEABILITY: 0.02 0.005 30 20 K (20 C) Remolded Effective size Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) ite Liquid Limit (LL) Plasticity Index (PI) Nf Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio mm DIRECT SHEAR: CD Ult. Res. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: Cohesion: psf RELATIONSHIP: D498 A D 4716 - 30% Correcdon pcf pcf psf G (net): PT): n (qu): 5.65°%° Q PPm FHA Soil Swell: % Swell psf Remolded Sample psf psf 2Q Q psf i1.Q,Q psf cm/sec act SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY 1 r GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 12 Willowview Way Battlement Mesa, Colorado Stacey Church Date Rifle, Colorado 4-4-2000 Job No. 87966 -GJ Drawn AM r•11111 1101i■■■ ■•111111•_ __■ ■18■ II �__ _.■.■8�_8I•_811 ■■■ll iniu■ ■ ■■IES Iummismo■gii r — moi■ ...•alltl•_■1111■�ts 5 / w ` ■�liiiiiiiiii■_o■i■ai■■a arm 1111111•111E111•1111111E11Eti■■■EII ras .1111111111M1111•E■■■■EIP 11111111111111MINIMINIII■■EI1 —_■MMION----_t11■■=E#1 ■■■■■r�____It■■EE■—�imi�11I■ ■■ immem____■■■■I■I■1�\1M1111=■Mw11■■ � Ellll■E1■E11 1111■■ ■���� ��■■ � � ��� ��■■II�ElllllllllllMi'�■■■EII1 -1♦ ' h a yf.: 111t�Ell�Ellllll��■EllEl ::■..aimal—tlii_�EmE�m u=i E•__ •E1■■ice:, rl■■1 -E1.111111EI1101M t1■ElIE1EI____ :.`,..':;: ...:.',:.'a■■■� ���■■ILEI■�����■IE■� 1 0) 0 0.9 r� 0 0.8 o.7 0.8 0 2 100 1000 APPLIED TEST LOAD - psf 10000 ��■■■■� 1111=11.111111=111111111111 1111111111111111111/11.1.- ■■111111_ =i { 0 111111111111111E14111111�•i111111__111 ��!� II11_•i,11111 •u111111 . ; .. Sh :: lt1I1 x.1111111 muli.:` 1111 1000 APPLIED TEST LOAD - psf 10000 The Consolidation Test (ASTM 0.2435) Was Run By Subjecting The &oil Specimen To A'Seating' Load To Remove Slack From Ths Apparatus And To Provide An Accurate Point Of Beginning. The Test Begins With The Specimen At Approximate Natural Moisture Content But, The Porous Stones Are Very Moist To Detect Soil Expansion Characteristics At The Ught Test Loads. Prior To Inundation. The Sample Is Loaded To 1025 psi Or Overburden Pressure Md Then Inundated With Water. Any Swan Or Collapse Ol The Specimen is Allowed To Occur And The Loading Is Continued, Alter The Maximum Teel Load, The Soil Specimen Is Unloaded To Measure Rebound And Any Swelling Potential Alter Consolidation. LOAD SUMMARY 110 1025 2.17% 0.00% 0.79 11.85 8200 psf SEATING LOAD pal' SAMPLE SATURATED SOIL COLLAPSE SOIL EXPANSION /SWELL % SAMPLE REBOUND ® UNLOAD % MAXIMUM CONSOLIDATION psf MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SOIL #: I SOIL TYPE : ML TEST HOLE #: 1 © 4' SAMPLE Gs: 2.68 DIAMETER: 2.5" AREA (inches): .03409 SOIL CONSOLIDATION ASTM D-2435 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 12 Willowview Way Battlement Mesa, Colorado Stacey Church Rifle, Colorado Date 4-4-2000 Job No. 87966 -GJ Drawn AM INITIAL MAXIMUM LOAD FINAL LOAD SOIL DENSITY (pcf) 87.4 98.9 98.1 SOIL MOISTURE (%) 6.6% 24.5% 25.1% CONSOLIDATION (96) -0-11.65% 10.86% VOID RATIO (e) 0.913 r 0.890 0.705 SATURATION (%) 19% 95% 95% psf SEATING LOAD pal' SAMPLE SATURATED SOIL COLLAPSE SOIL EXPANSION /SWELL % SAMPLE REBOUND ® UNLOAD % MAXIMUM CONSOLIDATION psf MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SOIL #: I SOIL TYPE : ML TEST HOLE #: 1 © 4' SAMPLE Gs: 2.68 DIAMETER: 2.5" AREA (inches): .03409 SOIL CONSOLIDATION ASTM D-2435 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 12 Willowview Way Battlement Mesa, Colorado Stacey Church Rifle, Colorado Date 4-4-2000 Job No. 87966 -GJ Drawn AM CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION OMIT ( VARIES — MINIMUM OF S FEET FROM BUILDING j S0L PREPARED 6" to 5" DEEP 70 LANDSCAPE. ROOF DOWNSPOUT USC 'LOW WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS and/or "XERISCAPING" TEC'HNIQUE5 WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING II 11 /u du TILLED for LANDSCAPING . —I §I FI 0 1 L EXCAVATION LIMIT L_`_ — __ 10:PYfti0/1— �. — —I PERIPHERAL DRAM and 4" dia. PVC ( �1s1 INSTALLED os per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SPECIFICA7)0NS — AS REQUIRED THE NA71VE SOILS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE REWORKED k COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES PVC DRAINAGE PIPE �, SOIL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO MINIMIZE WATER SEEPAGE TO ' THE FOUNDATION SOILS v DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAIN CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES — MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUILDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOIL PREPARED 6" to 8" DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. USE 'LOW WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS and/or "XERISCAPING" TECHNIQUES WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPtNC DRAIN GUTTER DRAIN PIP£ 1 �I ..:0�pi f�9 esu=y O W :O ra .i•op; e..o ."SS.:.. ..:1 1 •. �Or SCAPE -% GRAVEL/MULC NCOVERBENEATH I 4 1 \ SOIL BACKFILL I ti 1 1 COMPACTED 70 MINIMIZE. ----"Pr iWATER SEEPAGE TO THE FOUNDATION SOILS 1 EXCAVATION L+MIT � - -‘ . 1•4•.t%I I ` ,•4.1'• )- — — --I PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4" dio. PVC INSTALLED as per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER v SPECIFICATIONS — AS REQUIRED 7HE NATIVE SONS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' 70 BE REWORKED Cr COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN GRAND JUNCTION EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT DATE: 8-18-9$ LINCOLN—DeVORE, Inc. SCALE: LO FI. f GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS -GEOLOGISTS NONE 0- DRAIN 1 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS (for New Home Construction projects) INSTRUCTIONS: This Application & Checklist is to be used for all project submittals to the Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee (BMSA/AC). This form is intended to assist in ensuring that the application submittal is complete and will help provide a quicker, more thorough review process. It is highly recommended that each Applicant thoroughly review the requirements of the current Architectural Standards, the Amended and Restated Declaration of Covenants and the recorded Final Plat for their respective neighborhood prior to preparing a submittal. Applicants preparing a submittal should compare the information they are about to submit with the requirements of this form and "check off" each required item. If any item is not checked, the Application submittal is not complete and should not be submitted; incomplete Applications will not be processed and will be returned to the Applicant. In addition to the checklist, Applicants should fill in all of the places on the Application Form where information is requested of you. The Architectural Committee will use this information in evaluating your Application, If information is requested but is not applicable to your specific project submittal, write "N/A" in the space provided. If some required information is yet to be determined (such as exterior paint colors you may not have yet selected), please write "TBD" in the space provided, and you will then be required to make a follow-up submittal with these selections at a later date. DO NOT till in any intormation in the "Conditions for Approval" section of this form; this portion of the form is for Architectural Committee use only. When an Application is complete, please mail or deliver it to the following address: Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee Application 73-G Sipprelle Drive P.O. Box 6006 Battlement Mesa, Colorado 81636 The Architectural Committee meets twice monthly on the 1st & 3rd Wednesday, and Applications are due one-week prior to the Scheduled Meeting Dates for prior review by Committee members. Please contact Jane Chapman at (970)-285-9740 to confirm the next Scheduled Meeting Date. We thank you in advance for your cooperation and complying with the Architectural Standards of the Battlement Mesa Service Association. a:\bmsaac.ap2.draft031698 Page 1 of 5 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION & CHECKLIST (for New Houle Construction projects) Homeowner: 1-1� ;'_ � t_ e t '.. C • Home Mailing Address: r' ; _ .....�,_.,_ Home Phone: t., •=.;1(1 Work Phone (if desired): Project Address: ‘-.;,1 '`:r t , N., r . Lot:.-:? ] Block: 1 Subdivision: 10 ; k) , - ; + r Production Homeplan Name (if applicable): Homebuilder: !► ,' .8. Business Mailing Address: Business Phone: Submittal Date: Fax (if desired): �% 0 Estimated Start Date: - fit' Estimated Completion Date: i f ?1 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Two copies each of items 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted. (Check -off items attached to the Application. Fill in spaces as indicated.) 1. Site Plan Drawing (t"=i0' or 1"=20' scale) with the following information shown: Lot, Block & Subdivision name. / Street Address of Project. ✓ Building Setback Lines (also fill-in the shortest distance between property Zine to the exterior wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all Building Setback Lines are taken from your Property Line Pins !! Your Property Line is not the Curb Line !! Dwelling Unit Garage a -7 Front Setback: / feet .feet Left Side Setback: feet - feet Right Side Setback: feet feet Rear Setback: feet feet Utility Easements. 55' Clear Site -Line at Intersection Corner Lots. Site Grading Elevations & Drainage. First (main) Floor Height in relation to top of street curb at front -center of lot. Driveways (include width of driveway), Walkways, Patios, etc. Outbuildings a:lbmsaac.ap2.draft03i698 Page 2 of 5 • 2. Architectural Drawing {I/4" = or 1/8" = 1' scale) with following information shown. Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the following square foot areas). First Floor Finished Living Area: Second Floor Finished Living Area: Lower Floor Finished Living Area: Total Finished Living Area: Total Unfinished Living Area: /47C square feet t= square feet �` square feet square feet square feet Garage Area: 176 C square feet :// Building Elevations Plans indicating doors, windows, exterior materials, building height, roof pitch, roof -mounted evaporative coolers, etc. (fill-in maximum height below). Maximum building height to highest ridgeline or building structural projection 1 j) feet above top of street curb elevation at front -center of your lot. Engineered Foundation Plan. Outbuildings indicating dimensions, elevations and overall height to ridgeline. 3. Exterior Materials (fill-in the selections below): Roofing Material: c\-1 :;�� •�� ri �`' Color: Primary Siding Material: Accent Siding Material: Trim Material: ti ti Color: Color: Color: Masonry Material: 1- \ Color: Stucco Material: Front Door Material: C -r ? -•- -•\ Garage Door Material: C , • :.5 , 1v COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE a:Ibmsaac,ap2.draft031698 Color: ',/- • } , Color: Color: COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE Page 3 of 5 COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE 4. Landscape/Irrigation Plans with the following inforMation: Planting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated lawn, tree placement, shrub beds, groundcover, etc.). Plant Matetial Listing by species of trees and shrubs. Groundcover Material with weed control barrier. Fences. Other Landscape Improvements (decks. site lighting, flag poles, etc.). 3. Application Fee (payable to Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee): The BMSAJAC may require the applicant to pay directly, or to reimburse the BMSA/AC for payment of, any fees of outside consultants or any costs incurred by the BMSA/AC in its research, review or consideration of this application (per Section 9.6, Amended and Restated Declaration). I/We hereby acknowledge and understand that our failure to complete Homeplan or Improvement Projects or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints noted in Conditions 2. & 3. on Page 5 of this Application will result in a Notice and opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Conditions at the Hearing will result in a fine to the Owner of not less than 5500.00 per month for each full month in excess of the allotted completion time frame. I/We hereby acknowledge that Homeplan or Improvement Projects or Landscape Construction features which are built in non-conformance with this full application, including the Conditions of Approval noted on Page 5 of 5 herein, I/We will be cited by the BMSA/AC in written citation form at the time of discovery. In extenuating circumstances a Variance may be requested from the BMSA/AC, provided such Variance request item is within the purview and approval jurisdiction of the BMSA/AC. If a Variance is not granted by the BMSA/AC and if the Non - Conforming Items are not corrected within 60 days after the date of written citation, I/We will be served Notice and opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Non -Conforming Items at the Hearing will be fined a minimum of S500 per Non -Conforming item. Failure to pay fines levied as determined at the Hearings may also result in a Lien being placed on our Property or Litigation Process initiated by the BMSA Board of Directors to secure conformance with this full Application and its respective Conditions Of Approval. I/We further acknowledge that any subsequent field changes which I/We may desire to the Homeplans or Improvement Projects of this original Application Submittal and the original Conditions of Approval issued by the BMSA/AC will require an additional Revised Application Submittal on our behalf, and t t I/We will not proceed with any subsequent field changes until u Revised Conditions of A royal hav,beP issued to us by the BMSA/AC. Owner's Signature(s): Builder's Signature: Print Name(s): (JSj ! .7 C(J2i4'o Date:t j Date: a:lbrnsaac.ap2.draft03 ! 698 Print Name:DL»)7/1 C/ jel (-id Date: ("I: Li', Page 4 of 5 This portion of the Application Form to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. No sitework or building construction may proceed on any Lot (including no preliminary site clearing, grubbing, grade alteration, storing of material, foundation excavation, extension of underground utilities, etc.) until the Project has received a Project Approval from the Architectural Committee and has been issued a Building Permit (as required by Garfield County for New Home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and site improvements construction for any Project shall be completed and shall have issued a Certificate of Occupancy from the Garfield County Building Dept. no later than one (1) year after the issuance date of this Architectural Committee Approval. 3. The completed landscaping and revegetation of the improved Lot, to specifically include the front, side and rear yard areas, shall be completed no later than six (6) months from the date of Certificate of Occupancy. An additional maximum four (4) month extension may be granted by the Architectural Committee if the Certificate of Occupancy was issued shortly prior to the non -growing winter months such that landscape construction could not diligently proceed; however, in any event, the landscaping construction shall be fully complete no later than ten (10) months from the date of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Application ,4• + By:Mow- !!�. val (lnitial;,of Architectuommittee Members): Application Approved forons ruction sabject to the above conditions: By Chairman: Application Denied (Initials of Architectural Committee Members): By: Date: Application Dented: By Chairman: a:lbmsaac,ap2.draft031698 Page 5 of 5 Date: I INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS GARF1ELD.•CO Date Issued. I a Zoned Area RMIT 1111 COLORADO No_.(.XAX■',�w • AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with a laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the prop.:,n structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said latic- are rat f.fly complied with in the ip location, e -::42.4 and construction of abov described structure, the perms .`F y 'en be rev ` A ;.t'-jro :the County Build::, Ins " . ° ryel IMMEDI4TF : ? ", ` ti: _. =. s. , k This Card Must Be Post 1 Rear Street Until Final Inspection. INSIDE RECORD 1 Footing 1 Foundation 1 Underground Plumbing 1 I Insulation Rough Plumbing ��-' [ `�'�; Gf; ' iDrYwall �. X14 A04.kb- Chimney & Vent c ..l � ,, (,(, j) ' lectric Final (by State Inspectorlitri3� 91fl 1 Gas Piping c‘... ;t:� a`' I Final I I-15- oma A --a-. iv 1 Electric Rough (By State Ine'ctor) ""optic Final Framing c.. t 1 It Notes: (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). IALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, .UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. 314/. 6003 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phase 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Coloradg APPROVED DO NOT DESTR9 I Tins CARD Date By IF PLACED OUTSID COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC