The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit4 r • GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 No. 7645 Job Address ) CCaek bi . 4I q eroWtViAe L 4U t €L,4& tecix.0-6CaUtit, Nature of Work Bui18ing Permit Use of Building J �`� Owner - Contractor Amount of Permits __hoc. ( a. • 1 eiZA-vit a8 301.1z 96 Date 9j a/M 07/f a‘03`0 Fee,(A4 Clerk 16 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO ,68'4-5003 INSPECTION LINE: (970) IMS TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 PERMIT NO. (° PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. TOB ADDRESS: 1 'i P2 W �-9.Err PK r ?An LE " E 1 i, 1 r�F-i'4 � C //Pi A1 / LOT NO. % BLOCK NO. Eti SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION 'The. KESE423v, F 2 OWNER. f•).0 ?eel-. c..,1 1.-4 "MEM oo 272. tge-IS D2, CARF 71 - P"?aC.1 -4337 WK"': Secnejr 3 CORIIRACTOR Qom.,-. 5 EKt A6. ,goo M: µ LW. NO: i ( 4 MCNTTECTEEA [( /I( ADMEN t1 Pik 1( UC NO: I, 5 sQ. Fr. of ammoien)di.faQ. Pr. of LOT Oere,7% mow ( NO. OF - .lr Ir +^ 6 ME OF BUILDING S c DAN T 1 AL_ F---su-e ,,,,04:4,44.....4 7 °MIME WORK: "5 8R_ , 3 (Z- Pperii act cep -' 2 C14(17-- eesSe--AC,I7 `-e---41-4; ��etk 8 CLAN OF WOOL ffW ' DADDiTION GOVT AnON GNOVE OROMOVE 9 710 °MAO& P/NO[E H[� CAPPORT: =NOM ODOUBIE .AY MAU OON En IFIVACE DI3POSAL (912.I1C) 66 ---FLAN VALUATION OP WORK. $ 3®p / D.e'D ADJUSTED VALUAnON.F d .JC /7 v / OC , OD aPELTAL CONDm,.oNa: r q.� NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED COLORADO, THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED wall WHETHER HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORITY • • IOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY LOCAL EGUTATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE CONSTR ,00 �� r . . .40151%,..0=.�� t.,,r EY THE STATE OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OR DAYS AT ANY TIME APPLICATION AND OF LAWS SPECIFIED PRESUME TO GIVE OTHER STATE OR PERFORMANCE OF 24.Z9/2 y 1 tOod .ice - ' i r PLAN CHECK FF -E: f 1G J.-? t PERMIT FEE: i Q/ 4.1. ZS - TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED: J "l 21� f �(2. , (l fO O OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE: f -.- I�r 11-I U -1 ZA?TL*IG SETBACKS: i Signature of 1 . . COntnga a ,, . 71, : ` J i -' 10 MANU. HOME: ISDS NO. A : Pli Pc. J B Mr .. • P ate V Penang i .. q. P- AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDINGDEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID, THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN EN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTTER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTIT'ITI'E AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE TEEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WTIH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Oufonn.003 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL) pi? -3-;41r. (6 'r The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings; counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use an the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # bpcont Datei\P-42— (19/2.6-6—rp R 12. Serer --iµ G 144. Meadow CyteeK b& Aa,ccA t.L..{{c I'A 4' 1--� r c,p o �- G 0Q %R. 00 [791400.00 Lowe 11-(19 G?.op = I o(., ?oC.o0 C/44-CrOn-A6Z 3 2.6 (Tao S I Sc(2, 0 0 Fou/ -10. yl_Atvc. Boo ci.00 = �100.0O 4 r� ct , s --G f e_00 7 1 013G?? 00 TemlAccboonco G 06. (2.00 - 1 1),14,.00 3 1 l /5-(2.0t QEI�./-ra r rt FES q7, Q S est f 2_.q 6 06/21/00 09:56 FAX 9709234552 STERLING 1• d Homeowner: Home Mailing Address: LL 14 I1-iS� Home Phone: (4'11 10 4 1131 Work Phone (if desired): BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION & CHECKLIST (for New Home Construction projects) r.30,11- 04 raA Project Address: (44 M If#s K PL. Lot: (( Block: Subdivision: (ZEr. LuO Production Homepien Name (if applicable): Homebuiider. Business Mailing Address: Business Phone: - _ Fax (if desired): Submittal Date: I to Estimated Start Date: (0/15121yors Estimated Completion Date: R I zs,a I SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Two copies each of items I., 2 & 4 need to be submitted. (Check -off items attached to the Application. Fill in spaces as indicated.) 1_ Site Plan Drawing (1"8410' or 1"aN20' scale) with the following information shown: Lot, Block & Subdivision name. ✓ . Street Address of Project. l/ Building Setback Lines (also fill-in the shortest distance between property line to the exterior wall • closest to that property line). Please be swore that all Building Setback Lines are taken from your Promo, Lint Pins 1! Your_PTA/Oet1' Line is not he Curb Line !!. Dwelling Unit cogge Front Setback: LL feet J,,, feet Left Side Setback: 20 feet I s feet Right Side Setback: S'o feet feet Rear Setback: 4o feet — feet ✓ Utility Easements. V 55' Clear Site -Line ar Intersection Corner Lots. 1 Site Grading Elevations & Drainage. 11:First (main) Floor Height in relation to top of street curb at front -center of lot _"," Driveways (include width of driveway), Walkways, Patios, etc_ ''—'7' Outbuildings a:lbrnsaac.ap2.draf031698 Page 2 of 5 04 l 06/21/00 09:56 FAX 9709234552 STERLING 2. Architectural Drawings (1/4" - 1' or 118" • 1' scale) with following information shown. Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the following square foot areas). First Floor Finished Living Area: Second Floor Finished Living Area: Lower Floor Finished Living Area: Torsi Finished Living Area: Total Unfinished Living Area: Garage Area: 2 Sc' square feet f pi . square feet r Sia square feet ff34+4.- square feet bSCP square feet 1441, square feet Building EIevations Plans indicating doors, windows, exterior materials, building height. roof pitch, roof -mounted evaporative coolers. etc. (fill-in maximum height below). Maximum building height to highest ridgeline or building structural projection top of street curb elevation at Front -center of your lot ✓ Engineered Foundation Plan. Outbuildings indicating dimensions. elevations and overall height to ridgeline. 3. Exterior ivlateriais (fill-in the selections below): Roofing Material: Color: Primary Siding Material: Color: Accent Siding Material: Color: Trim MMateria1: Color: Masonry Material: Stucco Material: _ Front Door Material: Garage Door Material: A-vl is Color: Color Color. Color. COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE aAbmsaac.ap2.d raf031698 COLOR SAMPLE 7A feet above SLhaiAAJleteCi COLOR SAMPLE Page 3 of 5 003 t COLOR SAMPLE 06/21/00 09:56 FAX 9709234552 STERLING 1j02 4. Landscape/irrigation Plans with the following information: Planting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated lawn. tree placement, shrub beds. groundcover, etc). Plant Material Listing by species of trees and shrubs. Groundcover Material with weed control barrier. Fences. Other Landscape Improvements (decks, site lighting, flag poles, etc.). 5. Application Fee (payable to Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee): The BMSA/AC may require the applicant w pay directly. or CO reimburse the SMSA/AC for payment of any fees of outside consultants or any costs incurred by the BMSAJAC in Its research, review or consideration of this application (per Section 9.6, Amended and Restated Declaration). IfWe hereby acknowledge and understand that our failure to complete Homeplan or Improvement Projects or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints noted in Conditions 2. & 3. on Page 5 of this Application will result in a Notice and opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Conditions at the Hearing will result in a fine to the Owner of not Less than SS00.00 per month for each full month in excess of the allotted completion time frame. [/We hereby acknowledge that Homeplan or Improvement Projects or Landscape Construction features ►vhieh are built itt non-conformance with this full application, including the Conditions of Approval noted on Page 5 of 5 herein, I/We will be cited by the BMVISA/AC in written citation form at the time of discovery. In extenuating circumstances a Variance may be requested from the BMISA/AC, provided such Variance request item is within the purview and approval jurisdiction of the BivISA/AC. If a Variance is not granted by the BMSA/AC and if the Non - Conforming Items are not corrected within 60 days after the date of written citation, I/We will be served Notice and opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Non -Conforming Items at the Hearing will be fined a minimum of S$00 per Non -Conforming item- Failure teuri Failure to pay fines levied as determined at the Hearings may also result in a Lien being placed on our Property or Litigation Process initiated by the BMSA Board of Directors to secure conformance with this full Application and its respective Conditions Of Approval. I/We further acknowledge that any subsequent field changes which Me may desire to the Homeplans or Improvement Projects of this original Application Submittal and the original Conditions of Approval issued by the BMISAIAC will require an additional Revised Application Submittal on our behalf, and that I1We will not proceed with any subsequent field changes until a Revised Conditions of Approval have been issued to us by the BMSA/AC. owner's Signature(s): Builder's Signature: a:lbmsaac.ap2.draft03 /698 t Nome(s): gcbl lir URo Date: 81154 ey Date: Date: SIIAI0�"!i0 stint Name: Page 4of5 06/21/00 09:56 FAX 9709234552 STERLING f�01 This portion of the Application Form to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). c_Qjsi_pj_TIQN.LQZAUJKQy6L No sitework or building construction may proceed an any Lot (including no preliminary site clearing, grubbing, grade alteration, storing of material. foundation excavation, extension of underground utilities, etc) until the Project has received a Project Approval from the Architectural Committee and has been issued a Building Permit (as required by Garfield County for New Home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and site improvements construction for any Project shall be completed and shall have issued a Certificate of Occupancy from the Garfield County Building Dept. no Iatet than one (V year after alta issuance date of thisArchitectural Committee Aoprov 3. The completed landscaping and revegetation of the improved Lot, to specifically include the front, side and rear yard areas, shall be completed no later than six (6) months from the data of Certificate of Occupancy. An additional maximum four (4) month extension may be granted by the Architectural Committee if the Certificate of Occupancy was issued shortly prior to the non -growing winter months such that landscape construction could not diligently proceed: however, in any event, the landscaping construction shall be fully complete no later than ten (10) months from the date of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. 3. 6. 1. 8. 9. Applicatio By: (lniti s oyichiteccura m tree Me Z MEP' Applicn '.n Approve onftruction sub- to the above conditions: By Chairman: �— Date: Application Denied (initials of Architectural Committee Members): By: Application Denied: By Chairman; a:lbmsaac_ap2.draft031698 Page 5 of 5 Date_ - FIEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 6, BLOCK 8, BATTLEMENT CREEK VILLAGE BATTLEMENT MESA, COLORADO ` 14i ItaPop" 14 -me imist`a Fmk-. DEStbQ of fevorsinoN, i ait- 11-4e slEPogZ i C l AoD be R t is A4Ar& A put-' eff Tie cenavrtz-zript4 Pet.omeNTS n/1 D 6/10/ JOB NO. 196 529 OCTOBER 30, 1996 PREPARED FOR: BOB STERLING P.O. BOX 280 WOODY CREEK, COLORADO 81656 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. October 30, 1996 Bob Sterling P.O. Box 280 Woody Creek, Colorado 81656 Job No. 196 529 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 6, Block 8, Battlement Creek Village, Battlement Mesa, Colorado. Dear Mr. Sterling: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed residence at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring drilled in the proposed building area consist of about '/z foot of topsoil and 10 feet of stiff sandy silt overlying basalt fragments in a sandy clay matrix. Groundwater was not encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of. 1,000 psf. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Rev. By: SLP JZA/ro TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 3 FOUNDATIONS 3 FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS 4 FLOOR SLABS 5 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM • 6 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 6, Block 8, Battlement Creek Village, Battlement Mesa, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to you dated October 14, 1996. A field exploration program consisting of an exploratory boring was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a one and two story structure over a basement level. Part of the residence will have a structural floor over a crawlspace. The basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths up to about 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations contained in this report. H -P GEOTECH 2 SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant and vegetated with sagebrush, grasses and weeds at the time of our field work. The site was relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the southwest and about 10 feet of elevation difference across the lot. A cut up to about 3 feet high had been made for construction of the roads along the south and west sides. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on October 22, 1996. One exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch LD. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about th foot of topsoil and 10 feet of sandy silt overlying dense basalt fragments in a sandy clay matrix. Drilling in the basalt H -P GEOTECH 4 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Topsoil and any loose disturbed soils should be removed and the exposed silt and clay subgrade should be moistened and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water H -P GEOTECH 5 behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.3. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS • The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, should be suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The upper silt soils could compress when wetted and the basement slab could be on expansive clay subgrade. To reduce the . effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. H -P GEOTECH 6 Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected. from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: H -P GEo7ECH r t ji 7 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Heavy landscape irrigation (such as for sod) should be kept at least 5 feet from the building to limit potential wetting of the bearing soils. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no other warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. H -P GEOTECH 8 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Reviewed By: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZA/ro H -P GEOTECH e A. W ce 4 2 APPROXIMATE SCALE I" = 30 BENCH MARK GROUND SURFACE AT PROPERTY CORNER ELEV. =100.0`, ASSUMED. FAIRWAY STREET 196 529 HEPWQRTH - PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1 r r I • Elevation - Feet 1 • 4 ► 95 90 85 80 196 529 BORING 1 ELEV. = 94' 24/12 WC -1.9 DD -107 20033 15/12 WC=3.0 DD -99 1113.5/0 WC -6.7 DD=109 -200=88 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING 95 90 85 80 ....r Fig. 2 w U - c 0 v w LEGEND: ti TOPSOIL; sandy silt with roots, medium stiff, moist, dark brown. 24/12 1 T SILT ( ML); sandy, slightly clayey, fine sand layers, stiff to very stiff, dry to slightly moist, Tight brown, calcareous. GRAVEL ( GC }; in a sandy clay matrix with cobbles, possible boulders, dense, slightly moist, light brown, basalt rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 24 blows of a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. Practical rig refusal. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on October 22, 1996 with a flinch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The location of the exploratory boring was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. The elevation of the exploratory boring was measured by hand level and refers to the Bench Mark shown on Fig. 1. 4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. 196 529 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 f A 0 1 0_ 2 0. E 8 3 4 0 .� c co 0 0 I 1 E 8 0.1 .0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf Moisture Content = 3.0 percent Dry Unit Weight = 99 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silt From: Boring 1 at 5 Feet -ea,_ Compression upon weir Expansion upon vetting 0.1 .0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 0.1 196 529 Moisture Content = 6.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 109 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay Matrix From: Boring 1 at 10 5 Feet 100 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf HEPWORTH - PAWLAK 1 SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 100 Fig. 4 Expansion upon vetting 0.1 196 529 Moisture Content = 6.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 109 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay Matrix From: Boring 1 at 10 5 Feet 100 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf HEPWORTH - PAWLAK 1 SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 100 Fig. 4 1 _r i p. • . 4 • 0) N LO (0 a) O z m 0 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. w —J Co Q 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS d o g N% U) A U) Sandy clay matrix 1 UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IPSF) ATTER8ERG LIMITS j ce x z o t . d g ii pp U N N p 2 Qz Y ii y aW J a V l L.OI Ute} AJ.ISN3G ARO • 1VU(UUVN • O SAMPLE LOCATION BORING DEPTH CV LO o r GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check list at time of application for a permit. 1 January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lipes, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes V 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the prope Yes 4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? ty Yes 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clear_ �rrces required between wood and earth? Yes V 2 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's andoffits? Yes L 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wand loads? Yes 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof constructiop?/ Yes V 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof r or joists or trusses? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns nd beams? Yes ►/ 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grad ontours? Yes V 12. Does the plan incl de any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and ►r�.►' and Colorado Pse II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes 6 • No 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and venti tion for all habitable rooms? Yes No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safazing for these areas? Yes No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated o the plan? Yes No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architecturalV mmittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 20. Will this bonly residential structure on the parcel? Yes et No If no -Explain: 21. Have two (complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes I. 22. Do you and rr,9taand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes VV No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio e requirements? Yes V No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by #k Garfield County Building Department? Yes V No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicjion of these changes? Yes VV No 4 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? (V / Yes No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your spection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy ardoccupancy of the building? Yes 1/ No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", " eral Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project co ging with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. / Yes �/ No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. signa re Phone: 10 V r (3 37 Project Name: Project Address: r r 2 e)c)a date /CP/ (days); CsY'1E T�P-:L iS PF -NTE L4 `-f M 'EA -p ° C{ze k 'A -r -M -m- 1 e-01- 5 (evenings) Notes: If you have answered No. on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 1/00 6 4 ci cn • co o .= 6 O • a re 0• .3 V h 0 3 .0 '3 � • = ro 00 0 Comc rg -0 o0 L' 0v O bE�o Lam• . a U E cs" oh -2 "a 0 • 0▪ 0 1▪ 3 c 3 s 0 0 0gets- ctl c...4 4,4 z County Road (Note the Road Number and Name) p. 6 ri 1994 Building rade Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the *ides Snowload: 401bs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. /sq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches -30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowioad-imposed by snow) • 1 t . A GARFIELD COUNTY Building and Planning Notice of Clarification It is the interpretation of this department that the provisions of UBC Section 302.4, Exception Number 3, also applies to openings for access to attic space above a U occupancy. The access door in the ceiling of a garage must be self closing, tight fitting, solid wood door, 1-3/8ths inches thick, or have a 20 minute fire protection rating or the one hour fire separation wall between the garage and the dwelling must extend above the ceiling, all the way to the roof. Arlo Ehlers Chief Building Official 109 8th Street, Suite 303 945-8212/285-7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 ti. INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS.I THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB � �sP pro _..! 24 HOURS NOTICE REQIIIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date ;sstiek Zoned Area Permit No n GLIS AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all Laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspec r d IMMEDIATELY B COME N LL AND V ID. Use 1),,A)Mt COA1 , cio\t,o CaeeK 1ft P(\cka Contractor 0 Address or Legal Description Owne6� .�ok.2 Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Vainly Visible F[ rom The Street Until Final inspection. v._1- °� �* g- ft, ll'_iiNzcb INSPECTION RECORD i Footing ?., / _ ('jam ,t r Foundation _ «v 1 ; 0/'/irti Underground Plumbing cp..z _ ;' Insulation P4 - q Rough Plumbing , _ 7_.0 i Drywall 1 , L1 _ I A't.`S Chimney & Vent 2 _ 26, _ci_m Electric Final (by State Inspector) --of- of Gas Piping y _. 7 _ C%1 �� Final 6 _22_ f A �� I Electric Rough (By State I ector)Sah Si, Septic Final Framing x_26_0 (To include Roof in place and Bows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. • 5o03 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone AIi 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date I By V(- `k IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC