Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAspen Equestrian & Preshana Farms Comp. Plan AMDDev‘i cc, or% iorow4) I ihi. AMENDMENT OF THE EQUESTRIAN LOT ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND THE PRESHANA FARMS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • • • AMEDMENT to the GARFIELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDMENT OF PRESHANA FARM PUD & SKETCH PLAN for RESUBDIVSION of the EQUESTRIAN LOT at ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES SUBDIVISION September, 2005 Revised December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ZONE DISTRICT / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FORM RESOLUTION OF ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC MANAGER'S CERTIFICATE REPRESENTATIVE'S AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT FORM CONSULTANF TEAM TAB # 1 II. LETTER OF APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE GARFIELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP 2 LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP ASPEN EQUSTRIAN ESTATES FINAL PLAT PRESHANA FARM PUD EXISTING ZONE DISTRICTS (map) EQUESTRIAN LOT ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING LETTER — Background Traffic Growth III. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 3 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 4.00 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY ZONING REGULATIONS 4.01 DEFINITIONS 4.02 PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT 4.03 SCOPE 4.04 CONSISTENCY WITH THE MASTER / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4.05 RELATIONSHIP WITH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION 4.06 INTERNAL COMPATIBILITY OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS 4.07 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS 4.07.01 Approval criteria 4.07.02 Variance from parking requirements 4.07.03 Site Plan Criteria (1) Relationship to surrounding area (2) Circulation (3) Parking (4) Common open space (5) Variety of housing 4 (6) Privacy between units (7) Pedestrian ways (8) Zoning for utility facilities (9) Slope (10) Common facilities 4.07.04 Building height 4.07.05 Lot regulations 4.07.06 Density 4.07.07 Minimum acres 4.07.08 Uses allowed 4.07_09 Open Space criteria 4.07.10 Time-share and Fractional Ownership 4.07.11 Findings regarding affordable housing 4.07.12 Purpose 4.07.13 General 4.07.14 Definitions 4.07.15 Requirements — Affordable Housing Proposal 4.08 PUD PROCESSING V"tie `�`'`- f j -t 1 q 1 4.08.01 Processing 4.08.02 Processing prior to subdivision 4.08.03 Location of uses 4.08.04 Use regulations 4.08.05 Simultaneous zoning and subdivision processes 4.08.05 (1) Ownership Statement OWNERSHIP and ENCUMBRACNE REPORT DEED — U. c- 4.08.05 (2) PUD Plan (a) Number of dwelling units (b) Acreage of Common. Open Space (c) Uses and area (d) Circulation (e) School Dedication (f) Commercial / Industrial uses (g) Provision for utility services EQUESTRAIN LOT AMENDED ZONE DISTRICTS EQUESTRIAN LOT MASTER PLAN EQUESTRIAN LOT LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN EQUESTRIAN LOT ZONE DISTRICTS SUMMARY 5 6 (h) Zone Regulations 7 AMENDMENTS TO THE PRESHANA FARMS PUD ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS >r� 1 et,c,sc, ae.) y v o ut.b 11 �l (i) Phasing 8 PHASING PLAN 4.08.05 (3) Regional Map REGIONAL MAP GARFIELD COUNTY ZONE DISTRICTS MAP • 9 • • 4.08.05 (4) Existing Conditions 4.08.05 (5) Existing Topography PRESHANA FARM PUD EXISTING ZONE DISTRICTS (map) EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP 4.08.05 (6) Legal Description 4.08.05 (7) Written Statement (a) PUD Objectives (b) Development Schedule (c) Declaration of Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR N.C. ZONE DISTRICT (draft) PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCATI N STATEMENT DESIGN GUIDLELINES — rtes_, z7 (d) Adjacent Property Owners PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET ✓& 1 J ASSESSORS MAP .—d 1., r 10 11 12 (e) (i) Water Supply 13 (ii) Sewer Service WATER and SEWER REPORT WELL PERMIT SCHEMATICE WATER & SEWER PLAN — AEE/BC System Scenario SCHEMATICE WATER & SEWER PLAN — Commercial Village POA Scenario BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT CONTRACT CARBONDALE FIRE DISTRICT LETTER RANCH at ROARING FORK CAN & WILL SERVE LETTER RANCH at ROARING FORK TAP PURCHASE RECEIPT (iii) Drainage DRAINAGE REPORT (iv) Natural Hazards GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERIG STUDY (f) Access TRAFFIC STUDY 14 15 16 (g) Consideration of Natural Environment V. 17 BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER — SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION School District Fire District 4.08.06 Use Prior to Subdivision 18 • • 4.09 DEVELOPMENT IN STAGES 4.09.01 Development within 1 year 4.09.02 Revocation of PUD 4.09.03 Phasing delay 4.09.04 Non-residential construction 4.09.05 Impact on adjacent property 4.10 MAINTENANCE OF OPEN SPACE 4.11 FEES 4.12 ENFORCEMENT AND MODIFICATION OF PUD 19 IV. SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION 22 SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION FORM COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.00 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 3.10 NOT APPLICABLE 3.20 NOT APPLICABLE 3.30 SKETCH PLAN REQUIREMENTS EQUESTRIAN LOT SKETCH PLAN 3:40 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A. Water Supply - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (i) of the PUD Application B. Sewage Disposal - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (ii) of the PUD Application C. Soil Evaluations - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (iv) of the PUD Application D. Natural Environment - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (g) of the PUD Application E. Radiation Hazard - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (iv) of the PUD Application F. Access - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (0 of the PUD Application G. Public Utilities - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (2) of the PUD Application • 4.08.05 (1) Statement of Ownership (1) A statement of the ownership interest in the property to be included in the PUD and the written consent of all of the owners; An Ownership and Encumbrance Report prepared by Land Title Guarantee Company, elated August 30, 2005, demonstrates that the Equestrian Lot as depicted on the Final Plat for the Aspen Equestrian Estates PUD Subdivision is currently owned by Aspen Equestrian Estates, a Cnlnradn limited liability company. As noted in plat note no. 15 on the final plat of the Aspen Equestrian Estates PUD Subdivision, AEE, LLC is the record owner of the minerals underneath the Equestrian Lot. A Corporate Resolution of AEE, LLC consents to this application for a PUD amendment is included with the Zoning Amendment Application.at the front of this application . OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT DEED • • 19 • GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street. Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile_ 970.3 www_gartield-county_ com RECEIVED SEP 2 7 2005 i�„ 8`t�a� ion DING & -°L.ANNING Zone District 1 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) Name of Property Owner (Applicant): Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, Jay Weinberg Address: P.O. Box 2598 Telephone: (858) 756-3454 City: Rancho Santa Fe State: CA Zip Code: 92067 FAX: (858) 756-7232 Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Planner, Attorney, etc): Ronald Liston Address: 918 Cooper Avenue Telephone: 970-945-2246 City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: 970-945-4066 Street Address / General Location of Property: 3275 CR 100, Carbondale, CO;CR 100 southwest of Hwy 82 intersection. Legal Description: Equestrian Lot, Aspen Equestrian Estates, A Planned Unit Development, According to the Plat Thereof Recorded June 6, 2000 as Reception No. 564578, County of Garfield, State of Colorado. Existing Use & Size of Property (in acres): residential & equestrian Property's Current Zone District Designation: Preshana Farm Planned Unit Development; Open Space and Equestrian Center Proposed Zone District Designation: Preshana Farm PUD; Open Space, R10 -Single Family Residential, Residential/Equestrian, Neighborhood Commercial Property's Current Comprehensive Plan Designation: "Existing Subdivision", the Preshana Farm PUD was originally approved by the BOCC prior to adoption of the 1994 Comprehensive Plan Property's "Study Area" Designation: Study Area STAFF USE ONLY Doc. No.: Date Submitted: TC Date: 11110 Planner: Hearing Date os a 410) I. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any additional information to be submitted with this application: 1. The Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review for rezoning land in the county. The standard used to review a rezoning request depends on whether the proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. If so, the proposed rezoning need only bear a reasonable relationship to the general welfare of the community. If the rezoning would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, the Applicant generally needs to show either 1) that an error was made in establishing the current zoning, or 2) that there has been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood that supports the requested zone change. Depending on the subject property's Comprehensive Plan designation as mentioned above, you will need to appropriately address one of the following standards in a narrative form being as descriptive and specific as possible: A. The proposed rezoning for the subject property is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. As such, the proposed rezoning bears a reasonable relationship to the general welfare of the community. B. If the rezoning would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, the Applicant generally needs to show either 1) that an error was made in establishing the current zoning, or 2) that there has been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood that supports the requested zone change. 2. If the proposed zoning of the subject property conflicts with the current designation as defined on the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Districts Map, an Applicant may wish to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation so that the proposed rezoning does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan Map. If an Applicant requests to amend this Map, they will need to provide a thorough narrative that shows how their proposed Comprehensive Plan designation is better suited than the existing designation by addressing the goals, obiectives, policies, and programs listed for that designation in the Comprehensive Plan. This information can be obtained from the Building and Planning Department upon request. 3. Submit a zoning map showing the current zoning of the subject property and adjacent properties. 4. Submit a vicinity map showing relative location of the property at a scale of 1" = 2000', and extending at least 1/2 mile from all property boundaries. 5. Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all mineral rights owners of the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to the property. 6. Submit a list of all property owners and their addresses adjacent to or within 200 ft. of the site. This information can be obtained from the Assessor's Office. 7. Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property. 8. If you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement from the property owner that you may act in his/her behalf. • 9. Submit payment of the $450.00 Base Fee: Applicant shall sign the "Agreement for Payment" form and provide the fee with the application. 10. Submit 2 copies of this completed application form and all the required submittal materials to the Building and Planning Department. Staff will request additional copies once the application has been deemed technically complete. II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS (A Zone District Map Amendment is considered a two step process because it is first reviewed by the Planning Commission which makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissions. The following steps outline how the Zone District Map Amendment application review process works in Garfield County.) 1. Submit this completed application form (pages 1-4), base fee, and all submittal requirements to the Garfield County Planning Department. It will be received and given to a Staff Planner who will review the application for technical completeness. 2. Once the application is deemed technically complete, the Staff Planner will send you a letter indicating the application is complete. In addition, the letter will indicate the dates and times scheduled for your request to be heard before the Planning Commission during a public meeting (no notice required) and the Board of County Commissioners during a public hearing (notice required). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to be considered during a properly noticed public hearing. Staff will send you the appropriate "Public Notice Form(s)" indicating the time and date of your public hearing and will provide you with a Staff Memorandum regarding your requested Zone District Amendment. (If Staff determines your application to be deficient, a letter will be sent to you indicating that additional information is needed to deem your application complete.) 3. Please note, if an application includes a request to amend the current designation as defined on the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Districts Map, the request may be considered at the same meeting before the Planning Commission. However, the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be considered prior to the request to amend the zoning map. In addition, the Applicant shall be required to provide proper notice (as described below) for the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on the request. Further, the Planning Commission is the final decision maker on the Comprehensive Plan amendment request whereas the Planning Commission will make a recommendation on the rezoning request to the Board of County Commissioners. 4. It is solely the Applicant's responsibility to ensure proper noticing occurs regarding the public hearing before the Planning Commission and / or the Board of County Commissioners. If proper notice has not occurred, the public hearing will not occur. Notice requirements are as follows: a. Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot, a description of the proposed amendment and nature of the hearing, and the date, time and place for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in that portion of the County in which the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of such hearing, and proof of publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant. b. Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (1) above, shall be mailed to all owners of record as shown in the County Assessor's Office of lots within M two hundred feet (200') of the subject lot and to all owners of mineral interest in the subject property at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such hearing time by certified return receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the hearing by the applicant. c. The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and ensure that it remains posted until and during the date of the hearing. 5. The Applicant is required to appear before the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners at the time and date of the public meeting / hearing at which time they will consider the request. In addition, the Applicant shall provide proof at the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners (and Planning Commission for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan) that proper notice was provided. 6. Once the Planning Commission and/ or the Board of County Commissioners make a decision regarding the request(s), Staff will provide the Applicant with a signed resolution memorializing the action taken by either Board. Following the Boards' approval, this office will change the property's zoning designation on the zoning map and the Comprehensive Plan Map (if so decided) if approved. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 9 • ure of appli ant/owner Last Revised: 12/02/2002 Z. Cc Date • • • RESOLUTION OF ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company WHEREAS, that Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (AEE, LLC) is the owner of the 15.209 acre Equestrian Lot within the Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision PUD, Garfield County, Colorado, as depicted on the Amended Final Plat as recorded on December 28, 2001, as Reception No. 594567; and WHEREAS, the Equestrian Lot is subject to the Preshana Farm Planned Unit Development as approved by the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners in Resolution No. 98-11, and as subsequently amended by other resolutions of the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Equestrian Lot property is currently underutilized; and WHEREAS, AEE, LLC desires to amend the Preshana Farm Planned Unit Development and re -subdivide the Equestrian Lot to create a neighborhood commercial village, landscaped open space areas, four single family lots, and a residential/equestrian estate lot. RESOLVED, AEE, LLC hereby consents to and approves the submission of the necessary documents and applications to Garfield County to accomplish the above stated land use goals as they affect the Equestrian Lot. Dated this Z. day of '51) -c IAA b , 2005. ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company l:\2005\Clients\Aspen Equest-I 230\Documents\Resolution - 1.wpd September 7, 2005 Weinberg, Manager op MANAGER'S CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Jay N. Weinberg, hereby certify that I am the duly elected, qualified and acting Manager of Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, a limited liability company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado. I further certify that the foregoing resolution is now in full force and effect, that it has not been revoked, suspended or amended in any way, and that the specimen signature appearing above is the signature of the manager authorized to sign for this limited liability company by virtue of said resolution. Dated this Z(' day o rt --r tAAy ..4 , 2005. 1:\2005\Clients\Aspen Equest-1230\Documents\Resolution - 1.wpd September 7, 2005 einberg, Manager M August 30, 2005 Garfield County Dept. Of Building & Planning 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re. Comprehensive Plan and Zone District Amendment Preshana Farm PUD To Whom It May Concern: With this letter 1 authorize Ron Liston, of the planning firm Land Design Partnership, to act as a representative of Aspen Equestrian Estates LLC in regard to the above referenced land use process. Sincerely, • Jay Weinberg Aspen Equestrian Estates LLC GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT FORM (Shall be submitted with application) GARFIELD COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and Aspen Equestrian Estate LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) agree as follows: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for a Comprehensive Plan And Planned Unit Development Amendment (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type of subdivision or land use review applications, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the PROJECT, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT. APPLICANT agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional COUNTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base cee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, APPLICANT shall pay additional billings to 41100UNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the PROJECT mentioned above. APPLICANT acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the COUNTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. APPLICANT: Date: Aspen Equestrian Estates LLC Jay Weinberg Mailing Address: Aspen Equestrian Estates P.O. Box 2598 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 r PRESHANA FARM PUD AMENDMENT CONSULTANT TEAM Land Planning Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. 945-2246 Fax 945-4066 Legal Counsel Mike Sawyer Leavenworth Kirk PC 1011 Grand Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. 945-2261 Fax 945-7336 Civil Engineering High Country Engineering, Inc. 1715 Blake Ave., Ste. 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. 945-8676 Fax 945-2555 Water Resource & Wastewater Engineering Zancanella & Associates, Inc. 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph_ 945-5700 Fax 945-1253 Geotechnical Consulting Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. 945-7988 Fax 945-8454 • • • 1111111 III1111111111111!1111IIIIII1111111111111III!1111 549268 07/23/1899 10:42R B1141 P429 M ALSDORF 1 of 6 R 30.00 D 368.75 GARFIELD COUNTY CO WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this a -day of June- , 1999, between Henry Trettin and Lana Trettin , Grantors, and Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose legal address is 719 5' Street, Miami Beach, FL 33139, Grantee: oa ^rl WITNESSETH, That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledge, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do hereby grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Garfield, and State of Colorado described as follows: Parcels "A" and "B" as described on Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantors, either in law or equity of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. And the Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, and personal representatives, do covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, they are well seized of the premises above conveyed, have good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and have good rights, full power and lawful authority to grant bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments. encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, subject to and excepting: 1. General real estate taxes for the year 1999 and subsequent years. 2. Existing building, land use and zoning regulations. 3. Those certain conditions, restrictions, easement, conditions and matters enumerated on Exhibit 2 attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Grantors shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. oto 2- 246 (/ /€/l!— 2/.7r e-7— , , z a / . // fr. c -Z 3° �.2_03 ��6// �Jb�. 1111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111 549268 07/23/1999 10:42A 81141 P430 h ALSDORF 2 of 6 R 30.00 D 368.75 GARFIELD COUNTY CO IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have executed this deed on the date set forth above. STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ana Trettin The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this 05' day of ' v (- 1999 1999 by Henry Trettin and Lana Trettin. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: /i/2- /2',o, �. MARGARET R. JOY NOTARY PUBLIC tTATE OF COLORADO q.1; Cn nen.. if t a�,i.�e 1::1,.:112, it I • [•4'NIT.Aflr,,.n WmLeq GWO.p1 • -2- 111111 11111 111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 549268 07/23/1999 10:42A 81141 P433 M ALSDORF 5 of 6 R 30.00 D 368.75 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 1' EXHIBIT �` Our Order No. GW224611-4 FEE SIMPLE AS TO PARCEL A AND EASEMENT INTEREST AS TO PARCEL B THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY I9, 1915, IN BOOK 71 AT PAGE 603, RECORDED AUGUST II, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233 AND RECORDED JUNE 24, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 368 RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED AUGUST ID, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233 AND RECORDED JUNE 24, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 368 EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 1961 IN BOOK 337 AT PAGE 236 AND IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1990 IN BOOK 793 AT PAGE 891, CORRECTED JUNE 12, 1991 IN BOOK 806 AT PAGE 23. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 13. 1972 IN BOOK 433 AT PAGE 111 AND IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1984 IN BOOK 656 AT PAGE 856. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 07, 1969, IN BOOK 401 AT PAGE 28. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 07, 1987. IN • 111111111111HMI 11111111111111111 11111111 11111111 54 of 67g 10:421 81141 P434 M 368.75F GARFIELD COUNTYSCO 6 6 R 36.60 DD EXHIBIT 2- , 2 Our Order No. GW224611-4 BOOK 725 AT PAGE 792. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT, EASEMENT GRANT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 1986 IN BOOK 697 AT PAGE 6L6. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 88-006 RECORDED JANUARY 13, 1988 IN BOOK 727 AT PAGE 676 AND GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 89-121 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 IN BOOK 762 AT PAGE 535 TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MARCH 05, 1993 IN BOOK 856 AT PAGE 143. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1995 IN BOOK 957 AT PAGE 131. RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE UNINTERRUPTED FLOW OF BLUE CREEK. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. NOTE: UPON RECEIPT OF A SURVEY, MEETING THE ALTA MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR CONTENT AND ACCURACY, THE EXCEPTION SHOWN ABOVE WILL BE DELETED. PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADD ANY EXCEPTIONS IT DEEMS NECESSARY FOR MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SMD SURVEY. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION 98-11 RECORDED MARCH 10, 1998 IN BOOK I056 AT PAGE 952. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MEMORANDUM OF WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT RECORDED September 16, 1998 IN BOOK 1088 AT PAGE 800. TERMS. CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MEMORANDUM OP WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT RECORDED August 12, 1998 IN BOOK 1083 AT PAGE 131. • Os LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP 918 Cooper Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-2246 / Fax 970-945-4066 E-mail: rblistc@quixnet.net September 21, 2005 Mark Bean Director of Building & Planning 108 8th Street, Ste. 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: APPLICATION TO AMEND THE GARFIELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF 2000 This letter is offered as an application to modify the "Proposed Land Use Districts, Study Area 1" map (Land Use Map) which is part of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan ` of 2000 (Comprehensive Plan). Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC (AEE LLC) believes that changed circumstances, such as residential development along County Road 100 together with growth on Missouri Heights, has created the need for additional neighborhood commercial opportunities between Carbondale and El Jebel. The purpose of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan proposed herein is to facilitate the development of a neighborhood type commercial area near the intersection of County Road 100 and Highway 82. The proposed changes to the Equestrian Lot and the neighborhood commercial village use are depicted on the Equestrian Lot Illustrative Site Plan. I. The Equestrian Lot and the Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision. The property on which the neighborhood commercial area is proposed is a portion of the Equestrian Lot as depicted on the Final Plat of the Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision PUD (AEE). (See Plat map attached herewith). AEE is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of County Road 100 and Highway 82 behind Catherine Store. Catherine Store is not a part of AEE or the Preshana Farm Planned Unit Development (Preshana Farm PUD). AEE LLC is the owner of the Equestrian Lot. AEE is zoned as the Preshana Farm PUD which was approved by Board of County Commissioner (BOCC) Resolution No. 98-11. The preliminary plan for AEE was approved by BOCC Resolution No. 2000-15 as amended by BOCC Resolution 2000-30. The AEE / Preshana Farm PUD contains four zone districts: R10 — Single Family Residential, R20 — Single Family Residential, OS - Open Space, and EC — Equestrian Center. The two residential zone districts, together with the Subdivision Common Area / Open Space depicted on the Final Plat, make up the Aspen Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association (AEE HOA). The Equestrian Lot is not a part of the AEE HOA. The two Residential Zone Districts and the Open Space District at AEE have been improved with all public facilities and construction has occurred on approximately 410 eighteen residential lots. a The above referenced Equestrian Lot contains two zone districts as described by the Preshana Farm PUD. Five acres of the Equestrian Lot is designated as Open Space with the remainder identified as Equestrian Center District. Currently, the Open Space District can be used as a matter of right for the following uses: open space and greenbelt, park, water storage tank, and livestock pasture. The Equestrian Center District can be used as a matter of right for the following uses: riding stable, equestrian area, tack shop, agriculture (including greenhouse and plat nursery), employee housing, veterinary clinic, park and open space, and public equestrian events. Accompanying this Application is a separate application to amend the Preshana Farm PUD (PUD Amendment Application) to reconfigure the zone districts within the Equestrian Lot to accommodate an approximately three acre neighborhood commercial site, four additional single family residential lots and a large residential estate lot. The reconfiguration will preserve open space acreage at least equivalent to the current open space acreage. Please see the PUD Amendment Application for a more detailed description of the proposed development. Neither the Preshana Farm PUD nor the underlying zoning (Ag/Residential/Rural Density) accommodates the desired neighborhood commercial uses. An approval by Garfield County of the proposed amendment to the Preshana Farm PUD requires a preceding revision to the current "Proposed Land Use Districts" map to show a commercial node at the location of the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District as identified on the Equestrian Lot Amended Zone Map contained in the attached PUD Amendment Application (Section 4.04 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution). II. Legal Basis for Comprehensive Plan Amendment A PUD, or amendment thereto, must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (Section 4.04 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution). An application to amend the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate the goals of a proposed PUD can be submitted together with a PUD application. An application to amend the Comprehensive Plan must include "justification for the amendment based upon criteria for establishing land use designations" as described in the Comprehensive Plan. In adopting the Comprehensive Plan, the BOCC recognized that "the Plan is long-term in nature and will require periodic updating as needs and issues arise." (Comprehensive Plan, I-1). The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically define the standards or situations which justify a Plan amendment. Instead, the Comprehensive Plan sets forth ten policy factors which guide the designation of Land Use Districts which can be used to measure whether an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is warranted. These factors include: General Description Land Use Breakdown Climate Demographics Housing Transportation Commercial / Industrial Land Uses Open Space / Recreation Agricultural Uses Environmental Constraints Further, the Comprehensive Plan sets forth a "suitability analysis" for determining the compatibility and appropriateness of a land use activity for specific areas in the County. (Comprehensive Plan, IV -1). The suitability analysis considers planning factors such as: natural hazards, wastewater treatment, transportation infrastructure, land use (x ), cor patibility and integration with other urban uses. The Planning Commission and the BOCC must consider an analysis of both the relevant policy factors and the relevant suitability criteria when approving an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. di The information and discussion in this application demonstrates the appropriateness of pp _, amending the Land Use Map which would expand the existing "General Commercial" 'V designation on the Catherine Store property to encompass approximately three acres of t e Equestrian Lot at AEE.' In support of the amendment, this application discusses how growth in the area of County Road 100 and anticipated changes in population along the 11. Highway 82 corridor justify a "periodic update" of the Comprehensive Plan. This application examines the requested designated of the neighborhood commercial district in light of the relevant policy factors and the sustainability criteria. The Introduction to the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan includes a description of the comprehensive planning process. The final step of the process discusses ongoing "monitoring and evaluation" of the plan necessity for amendments and adjustments to the plan "due to changing conditions or new information". Change in land use patterns is a gradual process and there are no hard line parameters of "change" that suddenly call out for a revision to the Comprehensive Plan and its Land Use Districts Map. County Planning Staff generally do not have time to consistently monitor the constantly changing population, traffic and market demands throughout Garfield County. Therefore updating the Comprehensive Plan is quite often initiated by property owners who have recognized that the evolution and intensification of land uses in their area together with the expansion of various market demands (many times resulting from changes in other regions of the County or neighboring counties) warrant utilization of their property in a new or different way. M Despite the fact that AEE LLC is asking for the Comprehensive Plan to designate three acres of the Equestrian Lot as "General Commercial", AEE LLC would like to note that the commercial uses proposed in the PUD Amendment Application are far more limited than what potentially could be approved under the "General Commercial" classification. Dj • N Years ago, the area around Catherine Store was largely agricultural with scattered residences and small ranchette properties. The small commercial operation served these scattered residences and the small population residing on Missouri Heights which found the Catherine Store to be a convenient alternative to traveling into Carbondale. Because of easy access, many travelers on Highway 82 also stopped at Catherine Store rather than diverting into Carbondale or relying on the limited services at El Jebel. That said, the commercial services at Catherine Store are limited within the historic structure and fueling islands canopy to gasoline sales, convenience items and a liquor store. The long term potential of this site to provide expanded services is limited by the small size of the parcel (approximately 3/4 of an acre). The limited capacity of the Catherine Store site to provide expanded commercial services will be particularly evident if the property is ever renovated to comply with current development standards (building setbacks and access criteria) and consumer market expectations The development of the Ranch at Roaring Fork was the harbinger of future changes in the area around Catherine Store. However, it was a number of years before Aspen Equestrian Estates (Preshana Farm PUD) and St. Finnbar Farm sprouted on a large acreage of the old T.O. Ranch. During this time there were more residences being built on miscellaneous tracts and "exemption" parcels up and down the valley along Highway 82 and County Road 100. Residential subdivisions in Missouri Heights were also being developed. Most recently, the Blue Creek Ranch PUD was approved and is rapidly being built -out. A good barometer of change in the area around Catherine Store is the growth of traffic on the local roads. An in-depth traffic analysis was prepared in conjunction with the proposed PUD Amendment Application. Attached is a letter from High Country Engineering (dated September 21, 2005) summarizing the growth of traffic on County Road 100 since 2002 and projected out to 2010. From 2002, when the Garfield County last counted traffic on CR 100, to 2004, when High Country Engineering conducted new traffic counts, traffic on County Road 100 north of Highway 82 grew in excess of six percent over the 202 traffic and south of Highway 82 by greater than over 10 percent over the 2002 count. Traffic on County Road 100 south of 82 is projected to be over 6,500 trips per day on the average by 2010, a growth of 52 percent over the 2002 ADT. Additionally, these projected numbers probably don't adequately account for the likely development of currently vacant properties within a mile up valley from County Road 100 on both sides of Highway 82. The growing residential population in the immediate area of the Equestrian Lot site and on Missouri Heights is generating the need for more convenient retail, food service and personal service type neighborhood commercial opportunities. Conveniently located neighborhood commercial services can serve to reduce traffic pressures on Highway 82 and enhance the quality of life for the residents of Garfield County. As traffic grows on Highway 82 and County Road 100 into Carbondale, local residents will find travel on these arterials to be less and less enjoyable and increasingly more time consuming. The quality of life for County residents will be greatly enhanced by the convenient availability of shopping, restaurants and personal services at a location that can reduce • their reliance on traveling Highway 82 or County Road 100. The particular setting of the proposed neighborhood commercial site is ideal for "neighborhood commercial" because it is limited in size by the proposed surrounding landscaped open space and is positioned beside an existing small, but popular, commercial site. The popularity of the Catherine Store operation is also testimony to the growing demand for convenient neighborhood commercial services in this area. Following is a detailed review of how this concept of convenient commercial services is encouraged by the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan of 2000 as relates to the Equestrian Lot site as proposed by the accompanying PUD Amendment Application. Areas of particular relevance to the proposed amendment are discussed on an item by item basis while less relevant sections are addressed more generally. III. Compatibility with Section III, Garfield County Comprehensive Plan; Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs. Generally this discussion encompasses the stated Goals and Objectives for a planning area. Policies and Programs are generally not applicable to a Comprehensive Plan amendment although some Policy discussion may be included in the PUD Amendment Application. Only those Goals and Objective that have specific or related general relevance to the proposed Land Use Map modification are discussed herein. 1.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 2.0 HOUSING The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment does not directly impact the goals stated for this topic. The attached Preshana Farm PUD amendment proposes four single family lots to be added to the existing R10 — Single Family Residential District and the Residential / Equestrian District is proposed to allow one primary residence and one guest dwelling which would place the total dwelling unit count for the amended PUD at fifty-three. These extra units provide additional housing product for the area with minimal additional physical or economic impacts. The current PUD provides for a total of fifty dwelling units. The three dwelling unit increase over the current PUD will subject this amendment to the County's Affordable Housing regulations which would require three tenths (0.3) of a unit built in compliance with the affordable housing criteria. 3.0 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES: The issues identified relative to Highway 82 continue to be relevant today with recent traffic projections emphasizing the potential for traffic to dramatically increase on Highway 82 in future years. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would encourage use of the RFTA Transit system by enhancing the desirability of the Park -N -Ride facility near Catherine Store. The proposed neighborhood commercial site's close proximity to future pedestrian facilities associated with Highway 82 or the RFTA rail corridor will encourage residents in the immediate area to walk or bike to the neighborhood commercial site as well as • provide convenient services to recreational users of these future pedestrian/bike facilities. GOALS: Neighborhood commercial services located cross the street from the Park - N -Ride lot will encourage more people to utilize the lot because they will have the opportunity to make basic purchases, access personal services and enjoy restaurant facilities that they might otherwise serve as a reason to drive to work rather than utilize RFTA services. OBJECTIVES: 3.1 --- Although not a mass transit facility itself, the neighborhood commercial village will stimulate greater usage of the Park -N -Ride and Bus Stop near Catherine Store. 3.2 --- In addition to the above described stimulus, the neighborhood commercial site is located within walking and biking distance from a growing population of residents in the immediate area. Aspen Equestrian Estates, The Ranch at Roaring Fork and Blue Creek Ranch are all within walking distance of the site. A trail connecting to the AEE residential area is proposed in the PUD Amendment Application and a trail system is also proposed at the Blue Creek Ranch PUD to allow residents easy access to Catherine Store area. Potential future pedestrian facilities along the RFTA rail corridor and/or along Highway 82 will also benefit from the services provide by the neighborhood commercial village. 3.3 --- See PUD Amendment Application. 3.4 --- NA 3.5 --- NA 3.6 --- See PUD Amendment Application. 3.7 --- See PUD Amendment Application. 3.8 --- See PUD Amendment Application. 4.0 COMMERCIAL and INDUSTRIAL USES ISSUES: The Equestrian Lot area proposed for a commercial designation provides the opportunity to avoid the issues identified in Section 4.0 of the Comprehensive Plan: strip development, multiple vehicle access, lack of pedestrian access, insufficient infrastructure, lack of compatibility with adjacent use and negative visual impacts. This opportunity is effectively implemented by the plans contained in the PUD Amendment Application. By allowing a neighborhood commercial village on the Equestrian Lot, commercial development will be tightly clustered with the existing Catherine Store commercial area, thereby avoiding strip development. The site is served by only one access located with consideration of the future realignment of Old Highway 82. The PUD Amendment Application also proposes access easements to encourage the Catherine Store site to utilize this new access onto County Road 100 and thus lessen congestion at the County Road 100 intersection with Highway 82. As discussed above, pedestrian access can be provided through the proposed trail connections. The proposed neighborhood commercial area effectively uses existing infrastructure including the -1 sewer plant at the Ranch at Roaring Fork. The proposed neighborhood commercial village is located behind the existing Catherine Store, largely visually removed from Highway 82. The site plans will reduce visual impacts through intense landscape plantings, limitations on signage and design guidelines that have been developed to assure architectural styles compatible with the neighborhood. Land uses to the west and south are buffered by landscaped open space and landscaped berms. A commercial property owners association, which will be formed after development of the neighborhood commercial village, will be responsible to maintain the open space. GOALS: Commercial: Garfield County will encourage the retention and expansion of convenient, viable and compatible commercial development capable of providing a wide variety of goods and services to serve the citizens of the County. The proposed amendment achieves exactly the stated commercial goal of the Comp Plan. The new village will provide goods and services at a convenient location adjacent to an existing small, but popular, commercial facility thereby expanding the exposure for the existing businesses and diversifying the goods and services available. The proposed zone text included in the PUD Amendment Application for the new neighborhood commercial village specifically prohibits "convenience store" and "liquor store" to avoid competitive conflicts with the existing commercial operation. OBJECTIVES: 41. 4.1 --- NA 4.2 --- The proposed neighborhood commercial site will be adjacent to an existing commercial facility and will be buffered by over 5 acres of landscaped open space. The open space buffering varies in width from 73 feet on the south and over 300 feet on the west adjacent to the AEE residential area. 4.3 --- NA 4.4 --- The great attribute of this site is the convenience by which it is accessed by numerous County residents both on the Valley floor (midway between Carbondale and El Jebel) and in the County Road 100 service region on Missouri Heights which also ties in populations served by County Road 103 and 102. 4.5 --- The lighted, channelized intersection at County Road 100 and Highway 82 further support the accessibility of the site as well as the RFTA Park -N -Ride. The traffic study included in the PUD Amendment Application documents the adequacy of County Road 100 to accommodate traffic generated by the new neighborhood commercial village. Much of the traffic that will end up at the new neighborhood commercial village is already passing through the County Road100/Highway 82 intersection. Because of the site's convenient access to a large pool of County residents and its ability to draw upon existing traffic patterns, the new neighborhood commercial village will reduce the number of vehicles relying on Highway 82. As stated before, enhancement of the existing commercial node with greater and more diverse goods and services o • w plus an attractive, inviting shopping environment will encourage the use of the Park -N -Ride as well as entice shoppers to choose not to travel Highway 82 but to satisfy their convenience type shopping requirements at the proposed site. 4.6 --- The small scale convenience quality of the proposed neighborhood commercial village is consistent with the stated basic land use concepts of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site is a classic, tried and true land use planning concept of providing neighborhood type convenience commercial services at logical transportation nodes in the midst of an expanding residential area to reduce traffic pressures on inter -neighborhood arterial roadways and to provide residents with shops and businesses that they relate to as a part of their neighborhood. 4.7 --- Although this objective is directed at a County wide concept, the proposed neighborhood commercial village will be controlled by zoning regulations adopted as a component of the Planned Unit Development. The PUD zone regulations and design guidelines for the proposed neighborhood commercial village are more comprehensive and restrictive than the standard County commercial zone regulations. Further, as part of the PUD amendment process, the zone regulations and design guidelines will be scrutinized by the County. 4.8 -- The proposed neighborhood commercial site is currently and has been for several years used for horse paddocks and does not threaten sensitive environmental areas. Sewage will be treated by an existing central wastewater treatment facility at the Ranch at Roaring Fork and storm water discharge will be controlled to minimize potential pollutants from on site roadways and parking areas. POLICIES: 4.1 --- Wastewater will be discharged to an existing central treatment facility for which taps have already been acquired. Domestic water will be provided by a new on site central system approved by the State or connected to the Aspen Equestrian Estates / Blue Creek Ranch Water Association central water system. 4.2 --- The area of the proposed neighborhood commercial designation is outside of the closest community's area of influence. 4.3 --- Intense landscape planting and open space buffering is proposed in the PUD Amendment Application. 4.4 --- A complete analysis of traffic impacts is included with the PUD amendment application. 4.5 --- Although this policy is addressed as a County -wide topic, the use of the planned unit development zoning procedure to implement the proposed neighborhood commercial village, achieves the intent of the stated policy. 4.6 --- The proposed neighborhood commercial site is across County Road 100 from the existing RFTA Park -N -Ride facility. Provisions have been made for the future expansion of this Park -N -Ride facility which further emphasizes the appropriateness of this site to meet the needs of an expanding County population. Provision for a pedestrian cross -walk on County Road 100 between the Park-N- IP 11P M Ride and the new neighborhood commercial village is included as a requirement of the PUD amendment. PROGRAMS: The recommended zoning programs are basically achieved by this proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan since the site is already a part of an existing planned unit development which will be amended to accommodate the neighborhood commercial village. Use of the planned unit development process achieves the basic intent described in section 4.1 which is to establish more stringent guidelines for commercial development. Section 4.2 is about expanding the local economy which the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would achieve. 5.0 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE: While not necessarily a specific recreation proposal, although some people may count dining and even shopping for convenience goods as recreation, the proposed amendment does offer positive benefits relative to the issue of trails and open space. The neighborhood commercial site will be surrounded by open space which will include a proposed soft surface pedestrian path into the AEE residential area thereby connecting the AEE residents not only to the developed open space but also to the neighborhood commercial village. This trail may also serve as a future link to other trail systems outside of AEE. The proposed open space is currently a part of the Preshana Farm PUD but being used for horse paddocks as allowed by the PUD Zone Regulations. The amended PUD provides for the reconfiguration of the open space and for the landscape development and long term maintenance of the open space by the commercial area property owners association. With this proposal, the open space/park within the neighborhood commercial village becomes accessible to the AEE residents and to the public who frequent the new neighborhood commercial village. The open space parcel also extends out to Highway 82 further buffering one corner of the neighborhood commercial site that will be visible from Highway 82 from a distance in excess of 200 feet. The view from Highway 82 into the core of the open space parcel extends south across the proposed pond for a distance of nearly 700 feet creating a very attractive vista of water, trees and green spaces. Given its relative proximity to the future RFTA rail corridor trail system and the potential for access via the Blue Creek Ranch trail system, the neighborhood commercial village could well become an important relaxation and refreshment node on the RFTA trail system thereby enhancing the recreational experience of the trail system. 6.0 AGRICULTURE At the time of the Preshana Farm PUD approval, the equestrian center component was designed to serve a neighborhood commercial recreation market in the Roaring Fork Valley and secondarily the residents of Aspen Equestrian Estates. Time and experience have shown that the equestrian operation is not a viable commercial undertaking and has proven to be more of a detriment to the adjacent residences than an amenity. The shear numbers of animals necessary to maintain even a marginal business operation results in • • So negative impacts on the neighbors in term of odors and insects. The abandonment of a large scale commercial equine operation at this site is not an affront to the intent of the agriculture section of the Comprehensive Plan which is primarily focused on historic ranching operations. Due to existing space limitations at AEE, the facility has primarily served as an equine boarding facility as opposed to a ranch style riding facility. Under the PUD Amendment Application, the Equestrian Lot will be reduced to a residential estate lot with limitations on the numbers of horses allowed on the site and a maximum limit on the area of horse paddocks and confined pastures. The open space across County Road 100 from the proposed neighborhood commercial site is owned and managed by the Blue Creek Ranch HOA. The proposed neighborhood commercial development will not impact the management of the Blue Creek Ranch Open Space as irrigated hayfields or pasture. 7.0 WATER AND SEWER: Wastewater taps have been acquired from the Ranch at Roaring Fork in adequate capacity to handle all potential commercial uses at the proposed site. The Ranch at Roaring Fork operates a State approved and monitored central wastewater treatment plant. Sewer collection lines will be extended from existing main sewer lines. Domestic water service and fire protection water will be provided from one of two alternatives. A new central water system, which would be owned and maintained by the commercial property owners association, can be constructed to serve the neighborhood commercial site. Alternatively, the neighborhood commercial site may join the AEE/Blue Creek Water Association. Either alternative is capable of providing adequate domestic and fire protection water for the neighborhood commercial development. A raw water irrigation system using irrigation water rights will be constructed to serve the neighborhood commercial area, the open space tract, and the equestrian lot. An existing raw water system already serves the residential areas of AEE. 8.0 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The site proposed for designation as General Commercial land use is currently occupied by horse paddocks. Development of the site will not impact environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed development of the site will utilize storm water management techniques to protect surface water from parking lot sediments and oils. Paddocks and the concentration of horses will be removed from over five acres and replaced with landscaped parklands and pond. The proposed PUD amendment provides for intense landscaping of the neighborhood commercial site along with architectural guidelines that will result in visual character that is compatible with the surrounding new developments. In addition, the five acre park will be available to the neighborhood commercial guests and AEE residents. 9.0 NATURAL RESOURCE EXTRACTION Not Applicable 10.0 URBAN AREA OF INFLUENCE 10 GOALS: The subject site is outside of the Urban Area of Influence for the Town of Carbondale although it may be appropriate to refer this amendment request to the Town for comment. Although the proposed neighborhood commercial uses may impact future sales tax revenues of adjacent municipalities, the consideration for the benefits to County residents in terms of convenient services and reduction of future traffic pressures on area arterials are benefits encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan. The minor reduction in sales tax revenues in the surrounding communities, particularly on a per capita basis, will be partially offset by the reduced impacts on the community transportation systems and may help achieve a more desire experience on these municipalities' streets by customers arriving to make major purchases rather than just minor convenience items. The development of the proposed neighborhood commercial village is not perceived as having any direct influence on the land use patterns of adjacent communities. OBJECTIVES: 10.1. --- NA 10.2 --- The proposed neighborhood commercial, being located adjacent to an existing, developed commercial site will not degrade the rural character of the immediate area. The existing equine operation has not been a particularly compatible neighbor to the adjacent residential area and replacement of the extensive equine paddocks with five acres of developed parkland and a pond and an attractively designed and landscaped neighborhood commercial village will blend compatibly with the AEE development. 10.3 --- NA 1110 10.4 --- NA 10.5 --- Urban services and traffic infrastructure capacity is available to this site. 10.6 --- There are no municipal street patterns applicable to this site but the proposed access to this site has been aligned with the projected future realignment of Old Highway 82. The purpose of the realignment of the old highway is to accommodate a future expansion of the RFTA Park -N -Ride facility. The Blue Creek Ranch PUD developer has already dedicated land for the future realignment. Consistent with the intent of this objective, the proposed neighborhood commercial site will make access easements available to the adjacent Catherine Store property to potentially help reduce traffic congestion at the intersection of County Road 100 and Highway 82 by providing an alternative point of ingress and egress that is further away from Highway 82. When the old highway is realigned, the effectiveness of this alternative will be further enhanced. The Policies and Programs of this Section are not directly applicable to the proposed amendment. IV. Methodology Analysis of Proposed Change to the Land Use Districts Map This application requests that the subject site be designated on the Land Use District Map as "General Commercial" in the form of an overlay to the "Existing Subdivision" designation (Aspen Equestrian Estates) currently portrayed on the map. Section 4.04 of 11 the Garfield County Zoning Resolution states that; "Applications for Comprehensive Plan amendment shall include justification for the amendment based up on criteria for establishing land use designations contained in the Master/Comprehensive Plan". Following is an assessment of the proposed AEE neighborhood commercial site utilizing the ratings for "General Commercial" listed in Table 30 of the Methodology Section of the Comprehensive Plan. It should be noted that the proposed neighborhood commercial uses proposed in the PUD Amendment Application (together with the related design guidelines) are more restrictive than the General Commercial classification that would be applicable under Garfield County zoning. A. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS 1. SLOPE CONSTRAINTS: General Commercial rating: Moderate There are no slope constraints on the proposed site. Some fill will be placed on the site to elevate it to a level functionally consistent with County Road 100 and the adjacent Catherine Store. 2. SOILS CONSTRAINTS: General Commercial rating: Moderate According to a HP Geotechnical report, this site is underlain by river alluvial cobble/gravel with a mantle of varying depth of clayey soils. Gravel fill generated during construction of the proposed pond will provide the required structural fill for the neighborhood commercial site. Much of the high clay content soils will be stripped from the neighborhood commercial site and used in the proposed landscape berm expansion. These soil conditions pose no unusual challenge to the proposed structures and will cerate a sound foundation base. The site soil conditions are therefore consistent with the Moderate rating. 3. ISDS CONSTRAINTS; General Commercial rating: Moderate ISDS is not a constraint because wastewater treatment will be handled by the Ranch at Roaring Fork sewage treatment plant. A service agreement is in place for capacity adequate to serve the neighborhood commercial uses. There are no issues related to ISDS at this site. 4. FLOODPLAIN CONSTRAINTS: General Commercial rating: Moderate Not applicable because there are no floodplain constraints on this site. B. LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS 12 IP • 1. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: General Commercial rating: critical The responses to the Goals and Objectives in Section II of this application discuss at length the compatibility of the proposed neighborhood commercial use with surrounding land uses. As a recap, the site is adjacent to an existing service commercial development that is both zoned and designated in the Comprehensive Plan for commercial use. The site is buffered from adjacent residential uses by five acres of open space that is proposed to be landscaped at the time of development of the neighborhood commercial village and maintained by the commercial property owners association (POA). Across County Road 100 from the site is zoned open space as part of the Blue Creek Ranch PUD. Site specific landscape plans and lighting restrictions for the neighborhood commercial are included in the proposed PUD Amendment Application. Additionally, comprehensive design guidelines have been developed for the neighborhood commercial site and covenants for the area give representatives from the AEE and Blue Creek Ranch HOAs the opportunity to participate as members of the design control committee for the commercial POA. The neighborhood commercial village as proposed will blend comfortably into the area with a strong landscape impact and compatible architectural styles. 2. ROAD CONDITIONS: Recreation rating: Critical Again this topic is discussed at length in Section III. In summary the site is easily accessible from existing road infrastructure. The Equestrian Lot is in close proximity to the channelized intersection on Highway 82 with a traffic light. Detailed traffic analysis shows the County Road 100 is in good condition to accommodate the traffic generated by this small neighborhood commercial site. Although no improvements to County Road 100 are warranted by the proposed use, the developer does propose as part of the PUD Amendment Application to construct a south bound acceleration lane at the time of development. This is offered to assist County in accommodating future growth on County Road 100 and the improvement of County Road 100 is seen by the applicant as being beneficial to the market appeal of the proposed neighborhood commercial village. 3. INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS: General Commercial rating: Moderate The neighborhood commercial uses will be served by a central sewer collection system with wastewater treatment at the Ranch at Roaring Fork's existing sewage treatment plant. Central domestic water will either 13 be provided by a well and new storage tank or by connection into the existing AEE / Blue Creek Ranch Water Users Association. All water rights are in place to accommodate the new neighborhood commercial uses either in an independent community water system or the AEE/Blue Creek Water Association. 4. DISTANCE FROM URBAN USES: General Commercial rating: critical If this were a proposal for a large neighborhood commercial development the relationship to existing urban uses would be of greater concern. However, the proposed neighborhood commercial village is limited in scope with the primary purpose of providing convenience type goods and services that enhance the quality of life of nearby County residents and help relieve pressures on local arterial roadways. Additionally, the site is adjacent to an existing commercial site (urban use) that is accommodated by the County zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. The popularity of the Catherine Store demonstrates that a commercial development near that location will serve the needs of County residents. Expansion of commercial uses at this site to make a well rounded neighborhood commercial village would be an enhancement of the value and service that the existing commercial activity provides. 10111 V. SUMMARY The proposed expansion of the "General Commercial" land use designation at Catherine Store to include a portion of the Equestrian Lot is compatible with the Goals and Objective of the Comprehensive Plan and will result in a positive implementation of the policy factors in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, the proposed "General Commercial" designation is shown to be compatible with the suitability analysis ratings of the Development Constraints and Land Use Considerations identified as the appropriate methodology for establishing land use districts by the Comprehensive Plan. The limited nature of the neighborhood commercial uses proposed in the PUD Amendment Application (which are enhanced by the design guidelines) add compatible, low impact uses to the limited commercial selection already existing at the existing Catherine Store. Based on above analysis, approval of the expansion of the "General Commercial" Land Use District at Catherine Store would be consistent with the purposes and intent of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. Please contact me with questions or request of additional information. Regards, Ronald B. Liston Planning Consultant for Aspen Equestrian Estates LLC 14 • Res den::al -Ugh Density Mess Z a: CL • c• d at: 0. C 'a • z, (1) . ^ a) fa, CD O U -a >, C C4 a O v c.. r (1 I c C d O J 7 YJ d a a n ▪ w d y c k ? x L 75 7.i 75 111 . a .. 4 c c g.^ a 171 1• 71 CD 10 .0 4. a r IY Y r rn rn 1 X • • n _ WN ��-� a A 9€ma T���"r�����€g � �^$� >s� �K �� �g �' ��Fs:ms �� �� ��� �m�� a�"s� ��� �� �����x g �$ x a �� �xma�s'�� � a � ae� 14' a >a^��a� "zg�10 i ii Ha =m 4 gg ll r "n ji 's�' i �� =m �a � 8 > �� � 8 ��;. � F: �_�. FFFF'a'"-g g Q� �yy5' 4 .F 4 �4£"DP-='r NN yo1 s".. i —4 'v�S��N�O9 - A -i2 �E � m O NKN NFA NA � N�NF �i G �� EU 1A!J A+A ' H2m2'A.6. A ..%y 1 i9 011 �t�1 QQ� y $ mI1t -yI2-ir!QM>" 9- 8 «Om°� '2 P-' F ~ Ni�i iQ - O _ > "O Ao: Qy R RR A S°>9�0 "s_ "• R Iiiiii ��R���g'���4A���Pa� N��N�� ��e ���P �Fo$�_y�y }��{ � Fx__ 5$.� ���;�N��9N��R��-��P44N " 0 Sin 4y A-�RSI <- A'>°uiA rDo4 TN ire111.11 ���- _€.,-"i� �� Im g�����-,� �x� �> $����- ����x u� r�m�4a��s�� � � �� it�N=�� �o � ^��� �=N�� I!�m�. =. s � 9 $ _A�r"_a->;��m== � "aIi!N$Alip ���. zeasx�;aa"" _ �o4 aKR"r osr� �aNN--ao�m 4mi. Figipi !!g : "Elikhlliiii i '"h ! ilw! im !! N"oe o��m�o� m �g 4P4113A ���Ai�p�40 ��_��_ g o4 4$ �84�� � S g �x 8: 8� ��: ��x=AxN rs�� rF� N ���"aso !llgl AD�er��� ���a>s-4�-4'�_�=o� � II:Mi.:PI �a� N4:-�sm�->o���">a=� �" x� �€€;«R9 xPs-=€����2mK�11 R � ; 1r� 4 $- m g io ; e ! � L �-i;'- , m !! 7€ :i8R! ;--4,a 1 ; !i s^§-08P=L'' ' A € M14-1 a -. m N1P - -; gm=- . -M -1 Rs � i 9 rm § - u ! g_ � a xm �� 1Nas nR a �s a ��_R $ F F a *m or �.. sK S� b m4 r l Nc� 1u gN 04-o RroF 3N P - i u 8 Ei o '6mE,R4 _1 Sr 4 a� ilAtil4 p->sa s2 �� R o b�� 7. _ ��D € - F" r ` �a � �� m D8� NN!Ag _ss ^xAD N"A g 1�1b bERSN� m4� a�os g 8 m"X-° I �^ r" -g A 7 > mi*n $8-. o � E nii � uiy '> "u"m�N4 nH4�" "4r g4a r�a�r � Q €A. N9N-m8 _ a E 20 =I A 1.711; si memm �g�rz�� �_S ze �m N "� Ngo"e 4 g m -y Ft1$ill r1"lya €�ar�R�R� 78 ag 1ii v�uDm S'io4 4 R >-r4"4'u4a� ra 4m y^� i_;_p'E `D ` q; >� ��0511 u>�oA2� ">;'- _� �P �o Di>l- �"�_� >�£4 z�d"03S1' ��+�$4�J•M % .. A �>1 z x Jm li S �m 7r"" N o9m: *A- i""TN9a Q Q 44E £� F c Ez4"88m4`� eR 710,10 m>"�4 Y �N 82 4sNMR5"p=m xr 4:'1 Mi D c g P RSN% 7F N Si_mbEm �S'D>"mu 0Lrel4rvrNoi74--AEr-A 8 mmm a9M4 a € CC � H 4 �9R M 2Nm_yg; ��:g iry_11 a ! Oi oKm04N '� Z (�I�S N'�-RXS >i � Fo O Vg g.6b1 P °2 Ao 114GF: a 1$ mmP0g = AIPPT!g'gl§ C ir-l P- Lj m s 0411 pll1 !Ili al g z(71 0Z :v 040,52 EN tri rl O 0 1--� 1 A 11 VN 114. 21.9 216 E4 f � 84q A 9 X 59 A 11 5 9 8 1 4 9 5 5 s A 9 AP4 4 0 9 9 F 5 5 RA Pi Oat a ,12 Pm' �K4 DZE §1 Ipo A' 9N R 1 9 5 8 9 M I 5 yy �o w -43. b ijigAVRX R5 5 9"4sa 14140fEI II 411 414 q ng ND > D Z m m 9 8 A MI pr, isvil la 1°'' o ' oven �Emia''8"1-4 494 '111° > 4r' '''iM -r4m-r<4-r-p pl- u - u4 ���r i$'�b '>ti8 "o om >K � S8`-" o->�' o"-5R:a5= , 8""' uo �r�$ o'Fm.� '�' yi°.i; 4'W14$ NE�� ARJ E�gm� V�G 9'�' AID o'�"�' K 74mooA acNR AAN>3�e �- gl laA= .R" x m Ax s iA,_iFI -i K r . g`"t,� P-meo4'z �Q§ r hal:F ' 8oi4'-"E_ AUF41 ,Ngo 4A-;TA:,pogg0�'Atl. A.qi-e9 g o a oz 4 ""i4rm7-2x% "afs r`i. is -4349A -- AD4af$Lig.n§ptiMrAiip3ms`>"p:u"'�m-161a8 a8 o`b-�'L"', '� fl Fa �'r� o it s_i- 80-1014 Zglz"a-A3A"''�"-a y'6-1 RSB'R<NK/T11-(3 L' > =o":4 N > N -1 yN > -i lmmA i2D�g0 - A8 -:' xi 6_7 -441.418919. -es; m o. ,i xsm x P t Ro- sR.i m �" z .eH - _.0211p,..1 .- " , _ fess '1"'-- N,N� 82;<4"9 SDY+ 4,: �u4 o= aN $"7s �f2cmp6 g -1€- -4" 2-r.;/.?„;i6o�o a - o ui9 N22 12444 99 � b ��b 5i> $r 4 -4, 1 K- SCS.- .r. S"r 0 >m1�a� �4"'/1�� 22 � a= 1#1 i�i-sm �Z �$R N_�JE_oR ��K� r�N _ i��r ;,�. �_ 4A " -i 44 2g1 W-1 - C' N yy*{N-i(((��� ltl>mx-.Z-> DO ON[g!W >N♦ Om ■■3[ � �� �Tn O'O�1 qi^-'- « JJ9 V}Q ¢V��E p�jf�i01rX� 9rN _ �4. 9 gitN� - +1�� _ym r K qqqjj in/i° 8� ZF�ta3*I'1 F ( F rg-Q8°i i��'� A@ -g. , a- h. q RZrmyN RR ° 2P>. m NR Me NP" m ~.1 1p� . pp: A: PAm foil a AV g : N lia'0 hiii i R,-: '- s P 1 5V46";'415.41,:' -.4t? R,�_Fr4s> s m Pap lihAlAi" �o ��r��R ;� - " "���� a�a a�o�,�-�u��� agH�;� �F!spm"^ § RoN io i a 41ii!!!!!;:iF ^ E �+ o� zoo �gNki�R��u R In E 30 T LHS Vl H l l U) O C) z H Z O z tem rx d � t1 0> O rri co o0 0 'Nd H19 JHJ cD Ij z z ro • • • 11 phi 111 141 eNVBNNL 'IS m4 J a� a 21 N 00'00'18" E 111:32z m <� . 8' \ \ 185.88' ASPEN M ESIHI ESTATES m V V• D N 1 0 m N00. 7'35'E 1009.48' PERPETUAL EASEMENT A PORTION OF PARCEL "B" REC. NO. 375658 1.496 AC. +/- 155.00' 97.46' — s^ °v9 sI 7v 1013.63' 190.00' 1+ N00'00'18'E 8 123.88' N00'00'18'E 159.14' Z C+1 447 V -A, r,1 N00'00'18"E 163.88' IF 00'00'18'E N00'00'18'E 126.93' 201. _ N W U [� FX ♦ p2m - Vm:9 .W17 8OZ9'"�ftom O9ttyU o._ *8y OOF FIE TR X:2 qmkm 2 - Ado uauo 3 44 FA 7b 4 " 210.00. 8E ts ss $sxsX§sQ1QY111sX 1� II�QQ�{(�QQ�$$}QQ}jj 1QQ1�1""???�QQ�$$jQQj$$jssj���QQ�$$§ssssss�1Q�j14}1 �QQ�55 SNVm�1mUJSAfNO11+u�mmNF060ufJpY�mJ(I�U�Opa+uOtl3�d�� mnmmminmmm QP£E £ L £E QmQ�mEm m � 111111E9E5 o s Paaasgr ggs 3o E 9ixggI JN:PMIgg N m 4ognaf. mm_mfgo� am���m��> TAT NAAAA ANAAAAAAAAbaakhAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAabbaaAal \ \\ \\\\ \\ \ \\\ \\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\ \ EgiiN2npa222N1NNrp1.NNNN 0000000009ppppDLppppppppppp O00 as O o000 aaaaaaaaaaaa�aaaSSUSaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa as m ApppApppPpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppApppppppp y 8 8 03 f 0 at In 309.17' 01002001 ZEE: OELTA MEEME MEE MEESE 11 MEM 4110 • • z �q'S8'37.E cn cn NOISIAIQSlIS .£cu. 4t,t'66Z tP 13 n rn 11 „LZ,Lc•tt. s C) ��ruc' —'W 0-__A ac' L� Z� O✓ Z r CO ' '' t30 -1113a 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 1 8 8 9 5 8 S s 1 a 8 8 E S 8 i 1 8 x i N i ■ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a 14\ v� ^ ott, 101,0 ' oQIO os o 8 EMEMESIESSE MEMZEMEEMEM 3:11:11:21:13111: i :I • HWy 82 -Open Space District -II Propos ,n to the AEE HOA Access Easement Catherine Store tiot LL -.1 w txa 0 rl • RFTA Pork -N -Ride ce s Easement sgn OLD HWY 82 velope 4 t)lvlM 3ec.. "`-OPEN SPACE- ;"i" `` ;TN!U,t. Dedica o Corn ereiol Propert \\ _Expan & Add Y , . uts'A r1 riAssoc ration$ ® (.? 0 410 40 0 4, 4100 UTILITY DISTRICT Proposed Site of Buried Woter Tank for o r - POA Water System Option Existing Ber wing xisting Buildings RESIDENTIAL / EQUESTRIAN Existing Easement tor —�. DISTRICT Potable Woter System Utility Dist ict Parcel Propsed for ication he AEE/BL, Water Ass. of .1 6 toot high Fence with masonry posts and solid wood panels. Lots B12—B15 are proposed LOT B15 > /- additions to R/10 SFR Distri 11,990 s.f. / / LOT B14 / 12,100 s.f. 7 f /1-t11.0 Rt;•SIDEN' IAL DiSTRRJ/ / LOT B13 / V 14180 s.f. I LOT B2 13,770 s.f. USTRIAN Eq - trian Lot as s o —M s 44 =w NEW TRAFFIC TRAFFIC L v) Realignment 6-FTWY 82 ment Envelope O O Slue Creek ranch DUB (Open Space) pu--1 1$ALE 1"= 100 9/16/05 ENDMENT TI PLAN on Final Plat) • b An Employee -Owned Company Ron Liston — Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 Attn: Fred Jarmin SURN/EYING Planning Department: As requested we have prepared a summary of available background traffic information at the intersection of Hwy 82 and CR 100 and projected potential growth of that traffic out to the year 2010. In and attempt to locate problem areas, Garfield County updated their regional traffic numbers county wide in 2002 by compiling Average Daily Traffic (ADT) numbers. The following summarizes the ADT numbers and estimates peak hour volumes. To convert these ADT numbers to peak hour numbers, we have taken 10% of the ADT to create the Peak Hour Vehicles; this conversion is provided in the "Highway Capacity Manual". This is a common Traffic Engineering practice when true peak hour counts are not available. The 2002 Garfield County numbers at CR 100 and SH 82: CR 100 North of Highway 82 = 163 PHV, 1630 ADT CR 100 South of Highway 82 = 430 PHV, 4300 ADT Frontage Road to El Jebel (old 82)= 127 PHV, 1270 ADT In 2004 HCE collected the following ADT numbers: CR 100 North of Highway 82 = 173 PHV, 1730 ADT CR 100 South of Highway 82 = 477 PHV, 4770 ADT Frontage Road to El Jebel (old 82) = 138 PHV, 1380 ADT This gives us an average growth factor for the intersection of: CR 100 North of Highway 82 = 3.07% per year CR 100 South of Highway 82 = 5.45% per year Frontage Road to El Jebel (old 82) = 4.33% per year Using the actual growth factors calculated from the 2002-2004 span and factoring them out to 2010 we have projected PHV and ADT's of: CR 100 North of Highway 82 = 207 PHV, 2070 ADT CR 100 South of Highway 82 = 656 PHV, 6560 ADT Frontage Road to El Jebel (old 82) = 178 PHV, 1780 ADT 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.8676 phone 14 Inverness Drive East, Suite F-120 Englewood, CO 80112 303.925.0544 phone ,n, (VIC nce^i C___ 0 w The average growth factor figured into this region, as provided by Kimley Horn Traffic Engineers, is 1.75%, which is stated in their report dated August 2005 included in this application. We felt that it was appropriate to calculate this intersection based on the available information to get a more accurate depiction of what traffic is really doing at this exact location. The 1.75% is an average growth factor for a regional area, but due to the location of this intersection between two fast growing communities we have shown the higher growth rates for informational purposes. The average generated growth factor for this intersection far exceeds the average for the area. Matthew Langhorst High Country Engineering, Inc OD w w GARFIELD COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OF 1978 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO P.O. BOX 640 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 Adopted & Enacted January 2, 1979 Effective January 2, 1979 THIS COPY INCLUDES ALL AMENDMENTS THROUGH: NOVEMBER, 2004 For the convenience of the reviewing parties, Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC has prepared the body of its application to amend the Preshana Farm PUD by first presenting, in numeric order, each of the subsections contained in Section 4.00 of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations followed by a descriptive or graphic response to the information requested from the Applicant. The responsive text provided by Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC appears in bold twelve point font. M M Section 4.00 Planned Unit Developments 4.01 Definitions 4.01.01 Common Open Space 4.01.02 Plan 4.01.06 Density 4.01.03 Planned Unit Development 4.01.07 Fractional Ownership Interest 4.01.04 Commencement of Development 4.01.08 Ownership 4.01.05 Contiguous 4.02 Purposes and Objectives of Development 4.03 Scope 4.04 Consistency With the Master/Comprehensive Plan 4.05 Relationship to Zoning and Subdivision 4.05.01 Applicability to PUDs 4.05.02 Waiver or modification of specification 4.06 Internal Compatibility of Planned Unit Developments 4.07 Standards and Requirements 4.07.01 Approval of PUD rezoning 4.07.02 Off-street parking spaces 4.07.03 Site plan criteria 4.07.04 Maximum height of buildings 4.07.05 Lot areas and setback restrictions 4.07.06 Residential density 4.07.07 Minimum acreage 4.07.08 Uses permitted 4.07.09 Common open space 4.07.10 Time-share/fractional 4.07.11 Findings of the PUD Development Regulations Section 4.07.12 Purpose 4.07.13 General 4.07.14 Definistions 4.07.15 Requirements 407.15.01 For Lands Designated High Density Residential 4.07.15.02 For Lands With Any Land Use Designation Other Than High Density Residential 4.07.15.03 Computation of Required Affordable Housing Units and Mix of Housing Units 4.07.15.04 PUD Amendment Requests Subject To These Regulations 4.08 PUD Processing 4.08.01 Review of applications 4.08.02 Application process 4.08.03 PUD plan 4.08.04 Use and occupancy restrictions 4.09 Development in Stages 2 4.08.05 Application requirements 4.08.06 Use prior to approval M 4.09.01 Time limits 4.09.02 Late application 4.09.03 Failure to proceed to a subsequent stage 4.09.04 Nonresidential uses 4.09.05 Development & Construction 4.10 Maintenance of Common Open Space 4.11 Fee 4.12 Enforcement and Modification of Provisions of the Plan 4.12.01 Common Open Space 4.12.02 Enforcement of provisions 4.12.03 Modifications of provisions 4.12.04 Removal of rights to enforce 4.12.05 Independent or Outside Legal and/or Technical Expertise 4.14 Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelines 4.14.01 Renting, Purchasing, or Selling Affordable Housing Units -Qualifications to Rent or to Purchase Affordable Housing Units 4.14.02 Qualifications to Reside in an Affordable Housing Unit 4.14.03 How to Qualify for Affordable Housing Unit (Rental or Purchase) 4.14.04 Procedures for Initial Purchase and for Resale of an Affordable Housing Unit 4.14.05 Execution of Deed Restrictions by Applicants 4.14.06 Priorities for Persons Desiring to Purchase an Affordable Housing Unit 4.14.07 Maximum Vacancy of an Affordable Housing Unit for Rent 4.14.08 Leave of Absence for Owners of an Affordable Housing Unit 4.14.09 Roommates 4.14.10 Special Review for 4 to 6 Bedroom Units 4.14.11 Grievance Procedures 3 NGARFIELD COUNTY ZONING REGULATIONS SECTION 4.00: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS • w 4.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS 4.01 DEFINITION As used in this Planned Unit Development Section (hereafter "section") the following definitions shall apply, unless the context otherwise requires: 4.01.01 Common Open Space: A parcel or parcels of land, or a combination of land and water within the site designated for a Planned Unit Development, designed and intended primarily for the use or enjoyment of residents, occupants and owners of the Planned Unit Development. Categories of open space are defined as follows: (1) Useable open space: Any land retained in an open manner having average slope of 25%or less across the entire parcel, or is an existing or proposed agricultural area; (2) (2) Recreational open space: Any open space land to be developed into an area or areas for organized or unorganized recreational activities, examples would include, but are not limited to: soccer/football playing fields, parks, baseball/softball diamonds, or similar uses; (3) Commercial open space: Any open space land that would be developed into an area or areas of land, for which a fee would be charged for use. Examples would include, but not limited to: golf courses, water ski lakes, horse riding facilities, or similar uses; (4) Limited use open space: Any land to be retained as open space that has an average slope greater than 25%. (A. 97-109) 4.01.02 Plan: The provisions for development of a Planned Unit Development which may include, and need not be limited to easements, covenants and restrictions relating to use, location and bulk of buildings and other structures, intensity of use or density of development, utilities, private and public streets, ways, roads, pedestrian areas and parking facilities, Open Space and other public facilities. "Provisions of the plan" means the written and graphic materials referred to in this definition. (A. 97-109) 4.01.03 Planned Unit Development: (hereinafter a PUD): Shall mean a single parcel of land or contiguous parcels ofland of a size sufficient to accommodate an integrally planned environment, controlled by a single landowner, or by a group of landowners, to be developed as a unified plan for the number of dwelling units, commercial, educational, recreational or industrial uses, or any combination of the foregoing. The Plan for which does not correspond in lot size, bulk or type of use, density, lot coverage, open space or other restriction to the existing land use regulations and zone district. (A. 97-109) Any reference to a PUD shall be assumed to include reference to a TPUD as well, where applicable, whether or not "TPUD" is written. Transit Area Planned Unit Development: (hereinafter a TPUD) Shall mean a single parcel of land or contiguous parcels of land meeting the above definition of a "Planned Unit Development" and which also is located within 2000 feet of a planned or developed mass transit terminal or station which has been approved pursuant to § 5.11 of these regulations. If any portion of a property or parcel contained within a PUD is within 2000 feet of a planned or developed mass transit station or terminal the entire property, parcel or PUD shall be deemed to be included within a TPUD. A "planned" mass transit terminal or station, is herein defined as a facility identified in a bonafide and endorsed conceptual planning process by an agency or authority with legal standing to undertake alternatives analysis and conceptual design, and where that facility has progressed to the preferred or selected alternative for preliminary design, and where it can be reasonably assumed that such facility will be built within 20 years. The 2000 foot radius, where the facility is not yet in place or designed, shall be deemed to be from the center point of a probable location. Where there may be several probable locations in a given area, the Applicant may show such alternatives and accommodate those in the conceptual design and Sketch Plan of a TPUD in consultation with the board and to assist in review by a Mass Transit Agency. (added 2002-12) 4.01.04 Commencement of Development: Approval of a Final Plat and commencement of construction as secured by a Subdivision Improvements Agreement. (A. 97-109) 4.01.05 Contiguous: When applied to parcels of land, shall mean the lands have a common border and adjoin each other 4 w on at least one common property boundary_ for a minimum of thirty (30) feet. For the purposes of this definition. a public right-of-way or easement shall be considered a common property boundary for properties separated only by right-oi-way or easement. (A. 97-109) Contiguity. for purposes of creating a TPUD cannot be gained by a common boundary with a fixed guide way alone. A planned or developed mass transit terminal or station must be within 2000 feet. (added 2002-12) 4.01.06 Density: The overall average residential density shall be calculated by summing the number of residential dwelling units planned within the boundary of the PUD and dividing by the total gross area, expressed in acres, within the boundary of the PUD. (A. 97-109) 4.01.07 Fractional Ownership Interest: Any type of shared ownership or leaseback of a structure intended primarily for residential occupancy that results in occupancy shares being allotted for a designated period of time. (A. 97-109) 4.01.08 Ownership: Demonstration of ownership shall be constituted by current written proof of who or what entity holds title to all of the land(s) depicted on any plat or plan tiled with the County. with the minimum proof of ownership consisting of a title report issued by a title company authorized to conduct business in the State of Colorado. The title report shall be issued not more than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of submittal of the PUD application. If the land is owned by a corporation or similar legal entity. that designates an individual or entity to act in the Corporation's or similar legal entity behalf, a proof of agency shall be required and consist of a Corporate Resolution, or similar legal document, designating the individual or entity to act as agent. The application must be signed by an officer of the Corporation or legal entity and certified by the Secretary of the Corporation, or officer of a similar legal entity. (A. 97-109) 4.02 PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT The purpose of a PUD is to permit greater design flexibility and, consequently, more creative and imaginative design for development than generally possible under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations. It is intended that PUDs shall be planned to insure general conformity, both in substance and location, with the goals and objectives of the master/comprehensive plan through integrated development. (A. 97-109) The purposeofa TPUD is more fully set out in §5.11. (added 2002-12) This application is for the purpose of amending the existing Preshana Farm PUD to create four additional single family residential lots, reconfigure existing open space acreage, provide for the landscaped development of the open space and create a new zone district to accommodate a neighborhood type commercial village (as depicted on the Equestrian Lot Master Plan). This amendment will expand the mixed use nature of the Preshana Farm PUD and utilize the planned unit development mechanism to create a set of zone district regulations uniquely tailored to this property. The narrowly defined commercial uses and restrictions proposed in this amendment will be used to create a uniquely aesthetic neighborhood type commercial development ("neighborhood commercial village") as compared to the more expansive development that would be allowed under the standard commercial zone districts contained in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution. 4.03 SCOPE Applications for Planned Unit Development zoning may be made for land located in any zoning district. This PUD amendment application affects only the Equestrian Lot as depicted on the Final Plat of the Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision PUD ("AEE"). The balance of the Preshana Farm PUD, as described in detail below, remains unchanged by this PUD amendment. AEE is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of County Road 100 ("CR 100") and Highway 82 behind Catherine Store. Catherine Store is not a part of AEE or the Preshana Farm Planned Unit Development. The underling zoning for the Preshana Farm PUD is Agriculture/Residential/ Rural Density. Currently, the Equestrian Lot is zoned as part of the Preshana Farm PUD which was approved by Board of County Commissioner ("BOCC") Resolution No. 98-11. The Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision was approved by BOCC Resolution No. 2000-15 as amended by BOCC 5 M a• M Resolution 2000-30. The AEE / Preshana Farm PUD contains four zone districts: R10— Single Family Residential, R20 — Single Family Residential, OS - Open Space, and EC — Equestrian Center. The two residential zone districts, together with the Subdivision Common Area / Open Space depicted on the Final Plat, make up the property subjected to the Aspen Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association ("AEE HOA"). The Equestrian Lot is not a part of the AEE HOA. The two Residential Zone Districts and the Open Space District at AEE have been improved with all public facilities and construction of single family homes has occurred on approximately eighteen residential lots. The Equestrian Lot, which is the subject of this application, contains two zone districts as described by the Preshana Farm PUD. Five acres of the Equestrian Lot is designated as Open Space with the remainder identified as Equestrian Center District. Currently, the Open Space District can be used as a matter of right for the following uses: open space and greenbelt, park, water storage tank, and livestock pasture. The Equestrian Center District can be used as a matter of right for the following uses: riding stable, equestrian area, tack shop, agricultural (including greenhouse and plant nursery), employee housing, veterinary clinic, park and open space, and public equestrian events. 4.04 CONSISTENCY WITH THE MASTER/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN No PUD or TPUD shall be approved unless it is found by the County Commissioners to be in general conformity with the County's Master/Comprehensive plan(s). When appropriate. an application for an amendment to the Garfield County Master/Comprehensive Plan may be made as part of a PUD application. Any application for Master/Comprehensive Plan amendment mustbeapproved by the Planning Commission. prior to its recommendation on the PUD application, and may occur at the same meeting. Applications for Comprehensive Plan amendment shall include justification for the amendment based upon criteria for establishing land use designations contained in the Master/Comprehensive Plan. (A. 97-109) (added 2002-12: TPUD) This application is proceeded by a simultaneous request to amend the Proposed Land Use Districts Map contained in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000. The discussion relative to the proposed PUD amendment's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan has been presented in detail in the application to amend the Comprehensive Ilan and will not be repeated in this application. 4.05 RELATIONSHIP TO ZONING AND SUBDIVISION 4.05.01 The Garfield County Subdivision Regulations, as the same may be from time to time amended, and the provisions of this Zoning Resolution, as the same may be from time to time amended. shall be applicable to PUDs insofar as said Regulations and Resolution are consistent with this section and with any specific zoning or subdivision requirements approved by the County Commissioners at the time of zoning or platting the PUD in question. To the extent that said Regulations and Resolution are inconsistent herewith, they shall not be applicable and the provisions of this section and. with respect to TPUDs, supplementary regulations in §5-12 shall control. (amended 2002-12) No response required. 4.05.02 It is recognized that the uniqueness of each proposal for a PUD and TPUD requires that the specifications, standards and requirements for various facilities, including but not limited to, affordable housing, streets. highways, alleys, utilities, curbs, gutters. sidewalks, street lights, parks. play -grounds, school grounds. storm drainage, water supply and distribution, and sewage collection and treatment, may be subject to modification from the specifications, standards, and requirements established in the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County for like uses in other zone districts. The County Commissioners may, at the time of zoning as a PUD and TPUD, waive or modify the specifications, standards and requirements which would be otherwise applicable, as requested by the applicant. Any waiver or modification of specifications. standards and requirements will only be approved if it can be demonstrated that the proposed waiver(s) is consistent with "best engineering practices," as recommended by an engineer retained by the County. (A. 97-109) (amended 2002-12) 6 • Zoning criteria governing the Equestrian Lot is contained in Section 4.08 (2) (h) of this application including the proposed Amended Zone District Regulations. 4.06 INTERNAL COMPATIBILITY OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS It is recognized that certain individual land uses, regardless of their adherence to all the design elements provided for in this section. might not exist compatibly with one another. Therefore, a proposed PUD or TPUD shall be considered from the point of view of the relationship and compatibility of the individual elements of the Plan. and no PUD or TPUD shall be approved which contains incompatible elements internally or with neighboring property. (amended 2002-12) Internal Compatibility Several years after the construction and initial residential habitation of AEE, the equestrian element of the PUD has proven to be less than an ideally compatible neighbor to the residential area. Even with a large landscaped berm separating the two uses odors noise and insects from the equestrian activities can create conflicts with the residential use. The proposed amendment will dramatically reduce the equestrian component and replace horse paddocks currently occupying the Open Space Zone District with a landscaped park including a large pond and pedestrian trail, as depicted on the Equestrian Lot Master Plan. This five plus acres of landscaped open space will also separate the proposed neighborhood commercial village from the residential uses within the PUD. The separation of the proposed neighborhood commercial village ranges from over 70 feet from the scaled down Residential/Equestrian District lot to over 300 feet from the residential uses within the PUD. The proposed neighborhood commercial village will be further buffered by an increase in the height of the existing berm and the addition of extensive tree and shrub plantings to augment the plantings on the existing berm. A portion of the open space now included in the Equestrian Lot (0.71 acres) will be the location for an expanded berm buffering the residential areas of AEE. The area where the expanded berm will be built will be subdivided from the Equestrian Lot and dedicated to the AEE HOA upon completion of the berm expansion and additional landscaping. This will give the HOA absolute control over the long term preservation of the berm and landscaping buffer. The agreement between the AEE HOA and AEE, LLC ("HOA Agreement") provides for and approves this conveyance. A new zone district (Open Space -II) has been created for the open space areas within the Equestrian Lot. This new district reduced the allowed livestock activities in the Uses By Right section, added language to accommodate the proposed pond and raw water irrigation system and eliminated the "Golf Course and Golf Driving Range" from the Special Uses section. The Amended Zone District Regulations contain additional protections to ensure the compatibility of the neighborhood commercial village with the existing PUD elements. The commercial uses authorized in the Neighborhood Commercial District zone text exclude potentially objectionable uses and encourage amenity commercial uses that will benefit the surrounding residential area (i.e. coffee shop, restaurant, personal service shops and offices). The Amended Zone District Regulations also promote aesthetic commercial signage and limit light pollution that could affect neighboring homes. The proposed addition of four single family residential lots is an obvious and logical expansion of the existing R -10 -Single Family Residential Zone District. These lots were agreed to by the AEE HOA (in the HOA Agreement) to serve as a buffer along the residential entry road (Equestrian Drive) from the Residential / Equestrian Zone District. A six foot wood and masonry screen fence is proposed along the rear lot line of these lots to further enhance the buffering. The existing Equestrian Lot has been reduced to an approximately 5 acre tract with specific limitations on the horse population and the square footage of paddocks or pastures allowed on the lot. The Equestrian Center District is proposed to be replaced with a Residential / Equestrian Zone District which is more conducive to a residential estate than a 7 to • op commercial equestrian facility. This will result in a more compatible use of the Equestrian Lot property than the current large scale commercial equine operation. External Compatibility The proposed Neighborhood Commercial District is located in the northeast corner of the Preshana Farm PUD adjacent to the Catherine Store, an existing commercial site located outside of the PUD but zoned Commercial Limited and designated for "General Commercial" land use by the Comprehensive Plan. Designation of that portion of the Equestrian Lot as a Neighborhood Commercial District is consistent with the commercial designation of the Catherine Store. Both commercial developments are primarily geared to meet the commercial needs of local residents (such as residents at AEE or Blue Creek) and of consumers already traveling along Highway 82 or CR 100. 8 410 4.07 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS 4.07.01 The County Commissioners may approve a proposed PUD rezoning upon a finding that it will implement the purposes of this section and will meet the standards and requirements set forth in this section. A TPUD must also meet the additional standards and requirements set forth in the supplementary regulations found in §5.11 of this resolution. (amended 2002-12) OP 4Ib No response is required. 4.07.02 The number of off-street parking spaces for each use in each PUD shall not be less than the requirements for like uses in other zoning districts, except that the County Commissioners may increase or decrease the required number of off-street parking spaces m consideration of the following factors: (1) Estimated number of cars owned by occupants of dwellings in the PUD; (2) Parking needs of non -dwelling uses; (3) Varying time periods of use whenever joint use of common parking areas is proposed. The Garfield County Zoning Resolution, Section 5.01.02 "Minimum Off -Street Parking" provides very generalized off-street parking criteria for commercial uses. The proposed Amended Zone District Regulations contain parking criteria specifically tailored to the proposed commercial uses. For retail and service uses, the criteria is equivalent to County requirements. Proposed restaurant use will require more parking spaces than contemplated under the County's criteria and the proposed office space and health fitness uses will require slightly less parking than County criteria. The restaurant requirements also include provisions for outdoor seating at restaurants. However, the requirements proposed for these uses are consistent with the parking requirements of the zoning regulations for the City of Glenwood Springs and many other municipalities. This expanded parking criteria will assure adequate off-street parking at the neighborhood commercial village and will help avoid any challenges with interpreting the amount of parking required. No further revisions of the current PUD Off -Street Parking criteria are proposed. 4.07.03 The PUD shall meet the following site plan criteria unless the applicant can demonstrate that one (1) or more of them is not applicable or that a practical solution has been otherwise achieved: (1) The PUD shall have an appropriate relationship to the surrounding area, with unreasonable adverse effects on the surrounding area being minimized. Section 4.06 above describes how the proposed neighborhood commercial village has been located to minimize impacts on adjacent uses within the Preshana Farm PUD including buffering of the residential areas with five acres of landscaped open space. The most affected property is the Catherine Store commercial site immediately adjacent to the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District. Because Catherine Store and the proposed neighborhood commercial village will share the traffic challenges at the intersection of CR 100 and Highway 82, this amendment includes, at the time of the subdivision of the Neighborhood Commercial District (in accordance with the phasing schedule), the creation of vehicular access easements that offer the opportunity for Catherine Store an alternative point of ingress and egress. This should take some pressure off of the congestion at the Highway 82/CR 100 intersection (See the Equestrian Lot Master Plan). This application also proposes to construct an additional traffic lane on the west side of CR 100. This new traffic lane will initially serve as ingress and egress to the new neighborhood commercial areas but in the long term it is one step towards full channelization of CR 100 as it approaches Highway 82. Across CR 100 from the proposed neighborhood commercial village is an open space zone within the Blue Creek Ranch PUD. This open space zone district buffers the residential areas 9 01 N • of that development from Highway 82 and coincidentally from Catherine Store and proposed neighborhood commercial village. The compatibility of the addition of four single family residential lots and the revision of the AEE Equestrian Lot are also discussed in Section 4.06 above. (2) The PUD shall provide an adequate internal street circulation system designed for the type of traffic generated. safety, separation from living areas, convenience and access. Private internal streets may be permitted, provided that adequate access for police and fire protection is maintained. Bicycle traffic shall be provided for when the site is used for residential purposes. Ingress and egress from the neighborhood commercial village is aligned with the proposed future realignment of Old Highway 82. Property needed for this realignment and the expansion of the RFTA Park -N -Ride facility has been provided by the Blue Creek Ranch developer. From this channelized point of access (one lane in and two lanes out) the site plan provides for a looped roadway system retuning back to the main access. The roadway will provide access to the off-street parking spaces serving the neighborhood commercial village and will be overlain with a common use access and parking easement for the benefit of all commercial owners. Additionally, there are two off -shoot drives which serve the new neighborhood commercial uses but also provide access to the Catherine Store site. Access easements through the new neighborhood commercial village will be provided to the benefit of the Catherine Store property at the time of subdivision, although it is at the option of the Catherine Store property to construct connecting internal drives within the Catherine Store site to link with the proposed new parking lot roadways. The site vehicular circulation is consistent with typical parking lot design standards and has been reviewed by the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. (3) The PUD shall provide parking areas adequate in terms of location, area. circulation, safety, convenience. separation and screening. Parking spaces have been distributed uniformly throughout the site with a high emphasis on pedestrian linkage to the neighborhood commercial shops. Design guidelines call for changes in surfacing material and/or colors to help differentiate pedestrian use areas from vehicular use areas. The amendment includes landscape plans both for the neighborhood commercial village and the open space park with specific plant material quantities, size and type. A large landscaped "common" area has been preserved in the center of the parking loop to break up the visual image of parking and roadways and to provide a landscaped continuity across the site. Guidelines are included in the Amended Zone District Regulations which will govern minor revisions to the site plan and landscape plan at the time of subdivision or building permit. These guidelines will preserve the basic pattern of the site plan and intensity of the landscape plan while allowing for flexibility in the future design of commercial buildings. (4) The PUD shall provide Common Open Space adequate in terms of location, area and type of the Common Open Space, and in terms of the uses permitted in the PUD. The PUD shall strive for optimum preservation of the natural features of the terrain. As described above, there is a significant commitment to landscaping on the neighborhood commercial site and to total green space. The Neighborhood Commercial District Landscape Plan shows approximately 73 percent of the site in landscape (green) surface (not counting pedestrian walks or plaza areas). This is significantly greater than most commercial sites which typically may have from 10 to 20 percent of the site in landscaping. In addition, the acreage of the Equestrian Lot currently zoned as open space and currently occupied by horse 10 110, M or paddocks will be reconfigured and developed with a large pond and fully irrigated landscaping. These five acres of parkland will buffer the neighborhood commercial village on two sides and a part of a third side. As discussed in section 4.06, the portion (0.71 acres) of the open space encompassing the expanded berm will be dedicated to the AEE HOA upon completion of the berm expansion and additional landscaping. This gives the HOA absolute control over the long term preservation of the berm and landscaping. Terrain at the site is flat with no unique qualities and will be filled with gravels removed from the pond site to raise the grade to a functional level with CR 100 and Catherine Store. Fill along CR 100 will be a few feet deep but, with application of standard surface gradients for parking lot construction, will be very close to native grades at the west side of the neighborhood commercial village. (5) The PUD shall provide for variety in housing types and densities, other facilities and Common Open Space. The four proposed single family lots are simply an expansion of the current residential development at AEE. The AEE residential area has extensive open space and a developed community center with a community building, children's play equipment, tennis courts, putting green, pool and spa. Additionally, the open space around the neighborhood commercial village will be accessible to the AEE residents. (6) The PUD shall provide adequate privacy between dwelling units. The four proposed single family residential lots are equal to or larger than other lots in this zone district. (7) The PUD shall provide pedestrian ways adequate in terms of safety, separation, convenience, and access to points of destination and attractiveness. As described in Section 4.03 (3), pedestrian circulation within the neighborhood commercial village is well defined. Additionally, at the time of development of the neighborhood commercial village, a pedestrian cross walk will be provided over CR 100 to create a pedestrian link to the RFTA Park -N -Ride and Bus Stop. The internal walks are also designed to provide a convenient pedestrian link to the Catherine Store site. The soft surface pedestrian trail proposed for the open space park will be connected to the neighborhood commercial village walkways and will lead westward to the AEE Community Center. (8) If centralized water and/or wastewater facilities are proposed within the PUD, they shall be provided for in a separate utility zone district that shall contain its own performance standards. No land within any utility zone district shall apply toward any category' of open space calculation or requirement. The PUD shall demonstrate how common water and wastewater facilities will be controlled or governed by the future owners within the PUD. (A. 97-109) No wastewater treatment facilities exist or are proposed in the Preshana Farm PUD. Wastewater treatment will occur at the facility owned by the Ranch at Roaring Fork ("RRF"). AEE LLC has purchased taps sufficient for the neighborhood commercial village demand from RRF. RRF has provided AEE LLC with a commitment to provide service. The existing water storage tank and pump house which serve the residential portion of AEE and the Blue Creek development are located mostly on the current Equestrian Lot in a platted utility easement. This amendment proposes to carve out a parcel of land from the Equestrian Lot, if needed, to encompass the water storage tank and pump house. This parcel will be identified as a separate zone district and dedicated to the AEE Blue Creek Water Association ("Water Association") at the time that the AEE subdivision Plat is amended. As described elsewhere in this application, community water service to the neighborhood commercial village will be provided either by connection to the Water Association facilities or 11 • w by construction of a new buried storage tank, pump house and distribution lines (this decision will be made as part of the subdivision preliminary plan process). Therefore, a small (0.09 acre) Utility Zone District has been identified in the open space park. The required domestic water storage will accommodated by buried storage tanks located in the Utility Zone District. The Utility Zone District will also allow for open space and park land uses. A raw water irrigation system will be installed using the proposed pond as pumping basin for the irrigation system which will be designed to also deliver lire protection water flows to the neighborhood commercial village at volume and pressure levels as required by the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. (9) Any disturbance of slopes in excess of 40%, shall be the minimum necessary to meet the development needs, with a revegetation and geotechnical plan submitted with the PUD application. (A. 97-109) No slopes in excess of 40% exist on the site. The only steep gradient is in the artificial earth berm which will be landscaped and maintained with a raw water irrigation system. 10) If community facilities are proposed to be contained or allowed in the PUD, the application shall discuss who or what entity shall be responsible for the provision of and payment for the proposed facilities. The facilities shall also be included within the overall common infrastructure requirements of the PUD, to include water. wastewater and parking requirements. (A. 97-109) In the event that a new domestic water system is developed to serve the neighborhood commercial village, then the water system would be owned and operated by the commercial property owners association. The park open space parcel will be developed with earthwork, a pond, landscaping and a non - potable irrigation system as an element of the common infrastructure at the time of subdivision. The commercial property owners association will similarly be responsible for the maintenance of the open space and for that portion of the parking and internal roadways over which cross access and parking easements exist. 4.07.04 The maximum height of buildings may be increased above the maximum permitted for like buildings in other zone districts in relation to the following characteristics of the proposed building: (1) It's geographical location; (2) The probable effect on surrounding slopes and mountainous terrain: (3) Unreasonable adverse visual effect on adjacent sites or other areas in the immediate vicinity: (4) Potential problems for adjacent sites caused by shadows, loss of air circulation or loss of view; (5) Influence on the general vicinity, with regard to extreme contrast, vistas and open space; and (6) Uses within the proposed building. (7) Development supportive of mass transit operations in a TPUD. (added 2002-12) Building heights within the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District have been reduced to twenty feet to promote low profile structures. This is five feet below the typical building height for the underlying AG/R/RD zoning and the residential areas of the Preshana Farm PUD. Maximum building heights in the proposed Residential/Equestrian District are the same as in the existing Equestrian Center District. 4.07.05 The maximum lot areas and the minimum setback restrictions may be decreased below and the maximum lot coverage may be increased above those applicable to like buildings in other zone districts to accommodate specific building types with unusual orientation on the lot or relationship between buildings. The averaging of lot areas shall be permitted to provide flexibility in design and to relate lot size to topography, but each lot shall contain an acceptable building site. The clustering of development with useable common open areas shall be permitted to encourage provision for, and access to, common open areas and to save street and utility construction and maintenance costs. Such clustering is also intended to accommodate contemporary building types which are not spaced individually on their own lots but share common side walls, combined service facilities or similar 12 �a Op architectural innovations. whether or not providing for separate ownership of land and buildings. Architectural style of buildings shall not be a basis for denying approval of a PUD application. Lots within the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District are larger than minimum lots sizes in comparable County zone districts. The four proposed single family residential lots are equal to or larger than other lots in the residential portion of the Preshana Farm PUD. 4.07.06 The overall residential density shall be no greater than two (2) dwelling units per gross acre within the PUD; provided, however, that the County Commissioners may allow an increase to a maximum of fifteen (15) dwelling units per gross acre in areas where public water and sewer systems, owned and operated by a municipal government or special district (as defined by Section 32-1-103(20), C.R.S.) are readily available and the prior zoning classification allowed residential densities greater than two (2) dwelling units per gross acre, such increased densities shall nevertheless comply with the maximum lot coverage, minimum setback, maximum floor area ratio, maximum building height and parking standards of such prior zoning classification. The overall average residential density shall be calculated by summing the number of residential dwelling units planned within the boundary of the PUD and dividing by the total gross area expressed in acres within the boundary of the PUD. The density of dwelling units in any particular area may be greater than the maximum permitted for a like use in other zone districts. Averaging and transferring of densities within the PUD shall be allowed upon a showing of conformance with the purposes of this section through appropriate design features within the PUD that will achieve high standards of design and livability. (A. 83-93. A. 96-87. A. 97-109) (amended 2002-12) Where the application is a TPUD, and showing of conformance with the purposes of this section is deemed appropriate by the board, limitations set on previously zoned density of under two dwelling units per gross acre may be removed and the applicant may propose higher overall densities and exceed standard building height limitations otherwise specified herein, provided only that standards specified in 4.07.04 are considered. Special attention shall be given to fire protection and equipment needs triggered by such a proposal. Any proposal requesting a density above 5 dwelling units per gross acre within 2000 feet of a proposed or developed mass transit station or terminal shall provide 10% additional affordable housing units (In Study Area One, a total of 20%) with those units being within 2000 feet of the proposed station or terminal, even though previous zoning did not allow that level of density for those developments within 2000 feet. The intent of this section of the Resolution is to permit both the PUD allowance of increased density provided that 10% of the proposed units are affordable units, and an additional increased density, where increased density is proximate to and supports a transit station or terminal, and that higher density within 2000 feet of the transit station or terminal. The applicant must show a concentration of affordable units equaling 20% of the proposed housing stock where density exceeds five units per acre in Study Area One. (A. 83-93, A. 96-97, A. 97-109) (amended 2002-12) The gross residential density of the proposed amended PUD will be 1.09 units per acre. 4.07.07 The minimum number of acres that may comprise a PUD is two (2) acres. The Preshana Farm PUD is 57.89 acres in size. This PUD amendment only affects the Equestrian Lot, which is 15.209 acres in size. 4.07.08 All uses. which are permitted in the underlying zone district or consistent with the land use designations in the Comprehensive Plan, or approved as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, may be permitted in PUDs. (A. 95-043, A. 97-109) The uses, which shall be permitted in any particular PUD shall be those permitted by the resolution zoning the particular area PUD. The application to amend the Comprehensive Plan, submitted herewith, requests that a portion of the Preshana Farm PUD needed for the proposed neighborhood commercial village be designated as "General Commercial." Once so designated, the amendment to the Preshana Farm PUD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Even though the area for the neighborhood commercial village will be designated as General Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan, the uses that will be allowed under the Amended Zone District Regulations are substantially more limited in scope. 4.07.09 Twenty-five percent (25%) of the total area within the boundary of any PUD shall be devoted to Common Open Space. Not more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Common Open Space shall be an area of water classified as commercial open space. Of the 25% open space requirement within PUDs, no more than 40% of the 25% total required. shall be limited use open space. with the balance being retained as one or more of the remaining open space categories. listed above. Provided, however, that the County Commissioners may reduce such requirement if they find that such decrease is warranted by the design of, and the amenities and features incorporated into the Plan, and that the needs of the occupants of the PUD for Common Open Space can be met in the proposed PUD. (A. 97-109) 13 N M • The current Equestrian Lot contains 5.00 acres of land in the Open Space Zone District. The proposed amended PUD will contain 5.23 acres of Open Space -II Zone District land. The combined Open Space and Open Space -II Zone Districts (all open space zoning within the PUD) represent 39.1percent of the gross PUD acreage. Current Open Space District land will be converted from private equestrian paddocks to landscaped open space accessible to the residents of the PUD and the guests of the neighborhood commercial village. 4.07.10 If any zone district within the PUD is proposed to contain time-share or fractional ownership units, or other similar interest in property, the provisions for such ownership shall be those that are approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the time the property is zoned PUD. No time-share or fractional ownerships are proposed. 4.07.11 Findings of the Planned Unit Development Regulations Section: (2001-44) It is essential and necessary for the preservation and for the maintenance of the health, welfare, safety, and quality of life in Garfield County to ensure the provision of affordable housing, which mitigates the impact of new development. Recognizing that new development generates additional employment needs, and being consistent with a desire to have new development mitigate impacts attributable to such development, the County fords it necessary to require new development to provide affordable housing. Housing must be affordable to the local labor force in order for the local economy to remain stable and to grow in a healthy manner. (amended 2002-12) 4.07.12 Purpose: The purpose of this Section is to implement through regulation the Housing Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan for Study Area One including the following statement: "To provide all types of housing that ensures current and future residents equitable housing opportunities which are designed to provide safe, efficient residential structures that are compatible with and that protect the natural environment". The Garfield County land use review process will consider the housing needs of all economic segments of the community, and will assure that the impacts of new development will be mitigated, to the extent feasible, to assure an adequate affordable housing supply in the County. While the County recognizes that affordable housing is most desirable in or adjacent to towns, new developments throughout the unincorporated county are creating demands for workers in construction, maintenance, services, and retail sales. 4.07.13 General: This Section applies to all Planned Unit Development applications, which include residential development in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan's Study Area, 1. 4.07.14 Definitions: For purposes of this section of the Zoning Resolution regulations, affordable housing is defined as resident - occupied housing units, the sale or rental of which units have been limited to specific segments of the market with permanent affordability insured through appreciation rates controlled by deed restriction or another legally -binding mechanism approved by the County Commission. For the purpose of this section of the Zoning Resolution, unit is defined as a building used for residential occupancy which meets current County Building Code, not classified as a mobile home, and which contains one (1) complete kitchen. at least one (I) complete bathroom, at least one (1) living area, and from one (1) to six (6) bedrooms which is to be occupied by a single family living independently of any other family. 14 OD (10 ft (1) Eligibility - Affordable housing units will be made available to full-time residents and/or employees in Garfield County who have a cumulative net worth, minus qualified retirement assets. not in excess of $100,000.00 and who satisfy the income criteria set forth in the Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelines. A full time resident is one who will live at least ten months a year in the affordable unit. A full time employee is one who works or will work at least 32 hours per week for a Garfield County based employment source. A person who has been recruited to work for a Garfield County based employment source must produce evidence of an offer of future employment. Priority will be given to Garfield County employees. (2) Resale - The resale of affordable housing units will not exceed the purchase price plus the value of capital improvements authorized by the Housing Authority and the annual percentage increase in the annual Denver/ Boulder Urban Wage Eamers CPI or 3%, whichever is less. Affordable housing units will have a deed restriction carred with the title, which will regulate future sales to qualified residents who meet residency requirements, asset limitations, and appreciation rates. (3) Management - Ongoing management of the deed restrictions will be administered by the Garfield County Housing Authority, or another approved housing agency, according to an agreement brought forward by the applicant and approved by the County Commission. That agreement will also stipulate the means of determining the allocation of units, any proposed fees to fund the management agreement, and any other necessary terms. The agreement will be adopted as part of the final plat. The County will maintain a list of approved housing agencies in the Planning Director's office. 4.07.15 Requirements: In order to fulfill the goals of the Comprehensive Plan while directing growth into the areas designated in that plan, requirements will be based on the Proposed Land Use Districts from the Comprehensive Plan. 4.07.15.01 For Lands Designated High Density Residential: (1) Planned Unit Developments - All Planned Unit Development proposals, and Planned Unit Development Amendment requests which results in an increase in density, must provide that at least 10% of the housing mix are affordable housing units. Providing 10% affordable housing units will not, by itself, be sufficient to fulfill the PUD requirement for a variety of housing types and densities [Section 4.07.03(5)]. (2) Off-site - Given that these lands have been planned for two or less acres per dwelling unit, these are the locations most suited for affordable housing. Off-site proposals will only be approved by the County Commissioners if the applicant can demonstrate circumstances that would justify an off-site option. In any event, the applicant must show that affordable housing units meet the requirements of these regulations and the Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelines, and that these housing units will actually be built in Study Area 1. No cash -in -lieu payment will be accepted. 4.07.15.02 For Lands With Any Land Use Designation Other Than High Density Residential: (1) Planned Unit Developments - All Planned Unit Development proposals, and Planned Unit Development Amendment requests which results in an increase in density, must provide that at least 10% of the housing mix are affordable housing units. Providing 10% affordable housing units will not, by itself, be sufficient to fulfill the PUD requirement for a mix of housing. (2) Off-site - Given that these lands have been planned for low density, these are not always the best locations for affordable housing. At the applicant's request, Garfield County will consider off-site affordable housing. The applicant must show that affordable housing meets the requirements of these regulations and the Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelines, and that these housing units will actually be built in Study Area 1. No cash in lieu payment will be accepted. The proposed amendment to the Preshana Farm PUD will result in a net increase in the number of dwelling units by three over the existing PUD. Using the County's Affordable Housing 15 ft 0 w Development formula, the addition of three dwelling units will require the development of three tenths (0.3) of an affordable housing unit. As it is impossible to construct three tenths of an affordable housing unit, AEE, LLC proposes that approval of the PUD amendment be conditioned as follows: (a) in the event that Garfield County enacts a fee in lieu program for Affordable Housing prior to the recordation of the Final Plat for the PUD amendment, AEE, LLC will pay a fee in lieu of the three tenths (0.3) affordable housing requirement; or (b) in the event Garfield County does not enact a fee in lieu program, AEE, LLC shall participate in the construction of an affordable housing unit within Affordable Housing District 1 with another developer that is required to provide a fractional share of an affordable housing unit. Compliance with the affordable housing requirement will be at the time of the recordation of the final plat subdividing the four residential lots. Subsequent paragraphs of section 4.07 are related to criteria for the provision of affordable housing units that is not applicable to PUD amendment and thus are not shown. 16 ipo 4.08 PUD PROCESSING • flo 4.08 01 The approval of a PUD constitutes a Zone District Amendment. An application for subdivision Preliminary Plan may be considered simultaneously with the PUD application; however, the PUD zoning decision shall be made prior to the subdivision Preliminary Plan decision. A PUD is established by rezoning an area in an existing zone district to PUD, pursuant to the provisions of this Zoning Resolution and may include an application to subdivide the property, consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 30, Article 28 and Title 24, Article 67, C.R.S. and Section 3:00 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations of 1984, as amended. The County Commissioners are hereby declared to be the board authorized to review PUD applications pursuant to Section 24-67-104 (1Xc), C.R.S. Each PUD application shall be reviewed and approved, disapproved or conditionally approved by the County Commissioners within one hundred twenty (120) days of its determination of technical compliance by the Planning Department. The approved PUD zoning and the approved PUD Plan are inseparable and a PUD shall not be established without the approval of the related PUD Plan. The approved PUD zoning and the approved PUD Plan together establish the uses permitted in lieu of the zone district regulations which were theretofore applicable. If PUD and Subdivision Preliminary Plan are considered simultaneously. the approved Preliminary Plan must include the entire PUD. Subsequent final plats may be phased, in accordance with the approved phasing plan. (A. 97-109) The above -referenced one hundred twenty (120) day period shall commence when the Planning Department determines the PUD application to be in technical compliance with all information required by applicable rules and regulations. The Planning Department shall review the PUD application for technical compliance with all information required by applicable rules and regulations within thirty (30) working days of submittal. If, due to the scope of the application, the workload imposed by other pending applications or for any other reasonable cause the Planning Department is unable to complete the review within the time stated above, the Planning Department may request an extension of time from the Board of County Commissioners for such review not to exceed an additional thirty (30) working days. If the Planning Department determines the application is not in technical compliance, the Planning Department shall notify the applicant in writing of any additional information needed for technical compliance and the application shall be suspended in the review process until such information is provided. Following receipt of a noncompliance letter, an applicant may request a conference with the Planning Department to review the identified deficiencies. Such conference shall be scheduled at a reasonable time following the date of the noncompliance letter but in any event not later than ten (10) working days after such receipt, unless an extension of time is mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Planning Department. Following the receipt of a noncompliance letter, an applicant may furnish additional information to remedy any identified deficiency. Based on such additional information, the Planning Department then shall determine whether the deficiency in question has been remedied or not. A written notice of such a determination shall be sent to the applicant not later than ten (10) working days after receipt of the additional information, unless an extension of time is mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Planning Department. An applicant may appeal to the Garfield County Zoning Board ofAdjustment for a determination of technical compliance at any time in accordance with Sections 9.0401 and 9.04.02 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution. An applicant shall have six (6) months after the date of the noncompliance letter to remedy any deficiency and, if not provided within such time, the application will be considered terminated. A determination of technical compliance by the Planning Department shall not be deemed a recommendation of approval, a finding of adequacy of the application or a finding of general compliance with any goal or objective of this resolution. The express intention of this section is to process only PUD applications in technical compliance with all information required by applicable rules and regulations; however, the Planning Department reserves the right to request additional, pertinent information throughout the PUD review process. If an amendment to the Master/Comprehensive Plan is proposed as a part of the PUD application, then the Planning Commission shall take action on the proposed amendment to the Master/Comprehensive Plan prior to the PUD 17 41110 application. The Planning Commission's action on an amendment to the Master/Comprehensive Plan shall be after a public hearing, with at least fifteen (15) days notice, in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the County. and may be considered at the same meeting that the PUD application is considered. (A. 97-109 & A. 2000-68) The applicant requests that the 30 day Completeness review be initiated with the submission of this application as dated on the transmittal letter accompanying these documents. An application to amend the Comprehensive Plan has been included with this application and is requested to be processed simultaneously with this PUD application. After approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, the proposed amendments to the Preshana Farm PUD will be in substantial conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan for Study Area One. 4.08.02 An applicant may process their application for PUD zoning under this Zoning Resolution separate from and in advance of their application or applications for subdivision platting under the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. The Applicant requests that a Subdivision Sketch Plan review be processed simultaneously with this application to amend the Preshana Farm PUD. The Sketch Plan Application is included and immediately follows this PUD application and includes only land contained within the Equestrian Lot as created by the Aspen Equestrian Estate Subdivision Final Plat. Most requirements of the Subdivision Sketch Plan submission are met by this PUD application and the reader is referred back to those sections in the PUD application when appropriate. 4.08.03 The plan shall show where within the PUD each type of use will be located and shall indicate the total acreage which will be devoted to each use, where no subdivision of the property is proposed as a part of the PUD. The precise location of each use and the location of lots, blocks or other parcels within each area devoted to each use shall be shown as that area is subdivided and platted in accordance with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. (A. 79-132. A. 97-109) Please refer to Section 4.08.05, (2) - PUD Plan to review the location of the proposed uses; and to Section 4.08.05 (2) a - Land Use Summary for the acreages associated with these uses. 4.08.04 The uses by right, conditional uses, minimum lot area, maximum lot coverage, minimum setbacks, maximum height of buildings, and all other use and occupancy restrictions applicable to any area zoned as PUD shall be those which are approved by the County Commissioners at the time such area is so zoned. Please refer to Section 4.08.05 (2) h — Amended Zone District Regulations for a detailed listing of the criteria governing each type of proposed land use. 4.08.05 Where a Preliminary Plan application is included with a PUD application the Subdivision Regulation requirements will supersede the following PUD requirements where the same information or more detailed information is required as a part ofa subdivision application. The applicant shall include with the written request for PUD zoning which does not include a subdivision Preliminary Plan application the following information: A Preliminary Plan application is not included as a part of this application. The Preliminary Plan will be processed separately from and subsequent to the approval of this PUD application. 18 • • • 4.08.05 (1) Statement of Ownership (1) A statement of the ownership interest in the property to be included in the PUD and the written consent of all of the owners; An Ownership and Encumbrance Report prepared by Land Title Guarantee Company, dated August 30, 2005, demonstrates that the Equestrian Lot as depicted on the Final Plat for the Aspen Equestrian Estates PUD Subdivision is currently owned by Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. As noted in plat note no. 15 on the final plat of the Aspen Equestrian Estates PUD Subdivision, AEE, LLC is the record owner of the minerals underneath the Equestrian Lot. A Corporate Resolution of AEE, LLC consents to this application for a PUD amendment is included with the Zoning Amendment Application at the front of this application . OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT 19 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT Our Order No. GOE247302 This report is based on a search made of documents affecting the record title to the property described hereinafter, searched by legal description and not by the names of grantor or grantee. Consequently, the information as to record owner is taken from the most recent recorded Vesting Deed, and the information as to existing encumbrances reflects only those documents of record which specifically describe the subject property by legal description. Encumbrances not included are those of record which refer to the owner of the property or any other person having an interest therein which are filed by name only and do not include the legal description of the property. No information is furnished relative to easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions. This report does not include the results of any search under the names of the property owner(s) or the general index. Should such a search be desired please contact us for a separate general index report. Liability of Land Title Guarantee Company under this Owner and Encumbrance report is limited to the fee received. This Report is dated: AUGUST 05, 2005 AT 5:00 P.M. Address: Legal Description: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4.1 Record Owner: ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Recorded date of deed in to above owner: JULY 23, 1999 Documentary Fee on above deed: $368.75 We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: NONE By: Authorized Officer or Agent Our Order No: GOE247302 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EQUESTRIAN LOT ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 6, 2000 AS RECEPTION NO. 564578. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO 410 er 4.08.05 (2) PUD Plan (2) A PUD Plan indicating the broad concept of the proposed development. Such Plan shall clearly indicate: (a) The rnaximum number of dwelling units proposed within the overall area: (b) The minimum acreage which will be dedicated to Common Open Space; (c) The type of uses proposed and the acreage devoted to each use: (d) Major internal circulation systems: (e) The acreage, which will be dedicated for school, sites; (f) The general nature and location of commercial and industrial uses, if any, to be located in the PUD; (g) Provision for water, sewer, telephone, electricity, gas and cable television, if applicable; and Please refer to the following Equestrian Lot Zone Map and Equestrian Lot Master Plan (maps) and Land Use Summary for a complete presentation of the information requested in items (a) through (d). For a description of the information requested by Section 4.08.05 (2)(d) refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (1) — Access and traffic circulation. For a detailed discussion and graphic presentation of the central water and wastewater systems information requested by 4.08.05 (2)(g) see Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) — Engineer's Statement. The AEE Equestrian Lot, which is the subject of this application, contains two zone districts as described by the Preshana Farm PUD, the Open Space Zone District and the Equestrian Center District. Exactly five acres of the existing Equestrian Lot is in the Open Space District with the remainder of the 15.2 acre Equestrian Lot identified as Equestrian Center District. The following amendments are proposed for the Preshana Farm PUD Plan as it affects the Equestrian Lot: 1. Reconfigure the Open Space Zone District increasing it in size from 5.00 acres to 5.32 acres. 2. Create a new Neighborhood Commercial Zone District that can accommodate a maximum of 20,000 square feet of retail, personal service, office and food service uses. 3. Shrink the current Equestrian Center Zone District re -naming it Residential/Equestrian District and redefining the district to be more of a residential estate lot with specific limits on equestrian facilities and horse population. 4. Expand the current R-10 Single Family Residential District into the current Equestrian Center District to create four additional single family residential lots fronting on the existing public residential access road. 5. Create two small Utility Zone District tracts. One tract will encompass the Water Association's existing water storage tank and pump house; the other will provide a site for a potential additional water storage tank and pump house. No Preshana Farm PUD property outside of the Equestrian Lot is altered by this proposed amendment. A separate lot comprising of open space occupied by the enlarged berm will be subdivided from the Equestrian Lot. The AEE HOA will receive the open space parcel following recordation of the final plat and completion of the berm improvements. Telephone, electricity, natural gas and cable television will be installed underground within the amended PUD and in accordance with plans designed or specified by the utility companies serving this area. Service for these utilities will be provided by: Qwest Communications — telephone Holy Cross Energy — electricity K&N Energy — natural gas AT&T Cable — cable TV 20 EQUESTRIAN LOT AMENDED ZONE DISTRICTS EQUESTRIAN LOT ZONE DISTRICTS SUMMARY O. EQUESTRIAN LOT MASTER PLAN EQUESTRIAN LOT LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN 8Wy 82 ---------) r-ftl IiRFfA I Park—N—Ride II/ \013 HWY 82 ,...------ ------ Catherine Store { L ,----RRQPSOED LOT UNE -UTILITY DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL/EQUESTRIAN • St. Finnbar Form Subdivision Future// Realignmerf(of OLD HWY 82 Blue Creek Ranch PUD (Open Space) 0 �p 2 (7 0 SCALE 1'= 200. 9/16/05 0 U Lots B12—B15 are proposed addition: td the existing Ft A10SFR District ' farm PUD estrian Lot //DISTRICTS EE p p Z a.. O w O • Z Q cC2 4.1 w W p CC (3 CL W September 16, 2005 0 Z zZ N N W i- ci X W W cno a)o OPEN SPACE DISTRICT r r' EQUESTRIAN CENTER DISTRICT M N CO N M LC) O tri M N r O A -- LO to ti O N 4 O 713 O 46 O H ',-i U ( (3 6 0 H 6 U U L (B c co U D C »� HO )a 0 ND O? EQ U_- QQ J Z . O O zO wa c`a Fa v Q N U as a () c H W o- •(-2_ O a,U iii _� i O E= Em J_ U' E ao< E—UQ w Q O D RESIDENTIAL EQUESTRIAN DISTRICT R/10 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TOTAL EQUESTRIAN LOT U) TOTAL EQUESTRIAN LOT PRESHANA FARM PUD OPEN SPACE SUMMARY 38.7% of Total PUD 39.1% of Total PUD EXISITING PRESHANA FARM PUD OPEN SPACE AMENDED PRESHANA FARM PUD OPEN SPACE 0 CD U) I/ 1 I � Ci) z T 0 0 O2. ti o rri H 1-1 - dz � � o VtVHSJeld Ij z IXHINC \Jviv Qlld DCO -<-001 s D. 3 n Q� K O ) S r > 0 z(/)K C7 CO -0 n rn C o c 0(D -•m O O _ N ---",.-`0 ' Dc Mc Ko -03 -3 0 D -n0 «- ,Yl (b-0, -3 0 -0-•-03 -0- /r/� ,+ 0_ --oO N C 0 3, 3 0 0-, on) W 0< 0 T. -• C co O, co -- p• -. N 0 a.-.0 (D \ V ,00 -33 -0 -CD c 0--a c 2 (>y� o -F (� N co(� co(D -o --0 3 0 3v o 0 304 -• F - 0 C •• Q 3 (D c -o 3 0^ C 0 ,-- (D - (D X 3 X C F '� C O c O c 0 0 ^' N Vim( C N"0 c 3 -•l - 3 -Tl (D CO O (0 O N 0 - N X -.' M N< N 0 N 3 13 3 to C 0 �• D-- 3g N o N O O o. (p /T (D - 0 -- - V) -•- - < 0 (D -, V) DO O 0 `< O C C C 3- N O (n O O -0 O U co O -` '7 Ono F �• m h o m o <0_0-..- c) - O 0 -.. (p N -.1-V) - 3 O c COO H -0 S (D V)- CD 0- 0 -, 0_ -. -t n - (D K S (D 0 0 r- - -0 X C) " (D 0 N d -.(O c 3 ~ -0 -, 0 0- 0' -(D 0 0_ -- cococo0 0 0. (OD 0 rn 3 1 0 -.(D 3 m m (D 0 -• 7 D 0 0 N U— -• (D (D 0_ 0 3 7 3 3 (D -• -o � 3 F F --.CM �•(D ,� a 3 D 3 (0 .-. 0 3 0 N V) ZI o -- (D 3 N 0 << (D 1 3• -- O N N N N 0 C3 O O n co -(D V)3 K SK w 3 \ ,. O co co N (D C -, 0_ (D 3 (D 0 co ' C 0 F NJ _ „J 0 0 -.. 0 c m - - -,`< .-OO < - - 04 3 3 0 a 0 0 (D - (D (0 -- -I V) 0 N -. -. - 0 0 ^ C n 3 Q. F0 0 0 -. - o� Z O (D C C \ 0 0 0 Q 3 - 0 2 o o- 3 0- 4, 0.c - V) r'0 0. 0 0_ co a .y - O < -- 3 - -` (D -1 - • D 0 0 N 3 0< (D -,O• C3 0 (D 3 (D `< -0r< 0 - N ▪ 0 1- N 0- - S C (D 0) -•0 0 -' 3 0 (n -c S0 -•,-O c c 3 O 0 7c 3 C CD 0_ (0 0 (D 0 +7c —0 CO N r. 0 - (D 0- (D N C 0 -• 01 -, 0 13 3 ,0 - 0 CD n • • • FI W Y 82 ( W 0 cia 1,3 pen Space District—II Proposed for edication to the AEE HOA Pond OPEN SPACE -11 DISTRICT Dedicated to Commercial Property Owner's Association I I L_ Access Easement Catherine Store 1 NEIGHBORHQOD COMMERCI +t RFTA Park—N—Ride Access Easement 4 1 Sign OLD HWY 82 Envelope T Future Realignment of umentOLD HWY 82 on Sign Envelope OPEN aPAU — I I DISTRICT Dedicated to Commercial Property Owner's Association 4,000 sf Lot 1 DISTRICT UTILITY DISTRICT Proposed Site of Buried Water Tank for Com. Village POA Water System Option Expand Existing Berm & Add Landscaping RESIDENTIAL / EQUESTRIAN Existing Easement for DISTRICT Potable Water System Utility District Parcel Proposed for Dedication to the AEE/BL Water Ass. UTILITY/ DISTRICT // \ \ LOT B15 % 11,990 s.f. / \ / LOT B14 / 12,100 s.f. /R/10 RESIDEN''IAL DISTRICTS / LOT B13 / 14,180 s.f. 6 foot high Fence with masonry posts and solid wood panels. Lots B12—B15 are proposed additions to R/10 SFR Distri t /LOT B12s.f. Equestrian way Blue Creek Ranch PUD (Open Space) SCALE 1"= 100' 9/16/05 A l ENDMENT STS R PLAN iviion Final Plat) trian Lot as show r M 4.08.05 (2) (h) ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS (h) Other restrictions proposed by the applicant such as building setbacks. height limits. access requirements and grade or slope restrictions to be applied to particular areas, written in the form of a zone district text the same as, or in similar form to. the Garfield County Zoning Resolution; and The amendments to the PUD Zone District Descriptions and Variance from Subdivision Regulations ("Amended Zone District Regulations") shall govern the development of the Equestrian Lot portion of the amended Preshana Farm PUD. AMENDMENTS TO THE PRESHANA FARM PUD ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS 22 M • PRESHANA FARM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT P. U. D. ZONE DISTRICT DESCRIPTIONS and VARIANCE FROM SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS TO ZONE REGULATIONS Contained in: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-30 DATED April 17, 2000 OF The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. September, 2005 I. Amend Section A "ZONE DISTRICTS LISTED" to: Delete: EC Equestrian Center District Add: - O.S.-II Open Space — II District - WE Residential/Equestrian District - N/C Neighborhood Commercial District - U Utility District II. Replace Section C. "E.C. Equestrian Center District" with the following: C. R/E RESIDENTIAL / EQUESTRIAN DISTRICT 1. Uses By Right: a. Single Family residence, accessory uses customary to the residential use and fences, hedges, gardens, walls, water impoundments and similar landscape features. b. Caretaker or Guest dwelling unit, attached or detached from main residence and not exceeding 1,200 square feet. This unit may only be occupied by non-paying guests or persons employed on the property and members of their family. c. Riding Stable and Equestrian Facilities including and limited to; Barns and storage structures ii. Indoor and outdoor riding arenas Up to a cumulative total of 10,000 square feet of outdoor livestock containment areas (fenced paddocks and pastures). iv. No more than 25 head of livestock will be allowed within the District. d. Park and open Space 1 • r 2. Uses, Conditional: Home occupation 3. Uses, Special: None 4. Minimum Lot Area 4 acres 5. Maximum Lot Coverage 50 percent Minimum Setback a. Setback from County Road 100 50 feet b. Setback from all other R/E District Boundaries. 25 feet except for pre-existing structures 7 Maximum Building Height 25 feet, except for pre-existing structures. Existing structures exceeding this height may be maintained, repaired and restored in perpetuity including addition of new roof structures that are designed to break-up the mass scale of the existing roof lines and do not exceed the existing ridge line by more than four (4) feet if they are above the 25 foot building height. III. Add the following Districts: F. O.S. — II Open Space — II District 1. Uses By Right: a. Open Space and Greenbelt b. Park c. Pasturing of livestock . d. Orchard e. Pond, Wells and raw water distribution and pumping facilities 2. Uses, Conditional NONE 2 • w 3. Uses, Special NONE 4. Minimum Lot Area None 5. Maximum Lot Coverage a. Buildings: 5 per cent of net developable land with in District b. All impervious materials: 10 per cent of net developable land within District c. And as further restricted by Supplemental Regulations. 6. Maximum Floor Area NONE 7. Minimum Setbacks a. Setback from Hwy 82 ROW 100 feet b. Setback from Other District Boundaries 25 feet 8. Maximum Building Height 16 feet G. U Utility District 1. Uses By Right: a. Water storage tank, wells, pumping and water treatment facilities b. Open Space and Greenbelt c. Park d. Pasturing of livestock 2. Uses, Conditional NONE 3. Uses, Special NONE 4. Minimum Lot Area None 5. Maximum Lot Coverage a. Buildings and Impervious materials: 80 per cent of net developable land with in District 3 • • 6. Maximum Floor Area NONE 7 Minimum Setbacks Setback from District Boundaries 5 feet 8. Maximum Building Height 16 feet except that a water storage tank or a structure enclosing such tank may be 32 feet to the highest ridgeline of the structure H. N.C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Uses By Right: a. Personal service establishments including bank (with or without drive -up facility), barber and beauty shop, copy and reproduction shop, secretarial and business services, travel agency, real estate sales office, mailbox services and shipping supplies and services, electronics repair, massage therapy, tanning and manicure shop, tailor shop, shoe repair, indoor entertainment, consignment shop, dry-cleaning serving individuals only, and insurance agency. Fitness gym with exercise equipment and rooms for exercise classes; dance studio Small animal veterinary clinic with in-patient holding facilities contained entirely indoors with facilities for odor and sound control d. Delicatessen, cafe, juice bar, coffee shop, restaurant with or without alcoholic beverage service, provided no such individual business establishment shall exceed 4,000 square feet of gross interior floor area. Outdoor food and beverage service facilities with a seating capacity greater than 36 seats shall be allowed only. on the easterly one-half of the District. Drive-through food or beverage service facilities are not allowed within the District. f. Retail sales of clothes and foot ware, gifts, crafts and art products, curios, books and magazines, antiques, photographic supplies, flowers and live plants, tack and equestrian supplies, pets and pet supplies, ranch supplies and pre-packaged livestock feeds, fishing tackle and sports equipment, supplies and accessories, provided, the retail sales display area shall be limited to a maximum of 1,400 square feet within any individual business establishment. g. Business, Professional and Medical Offices. h. Park and open space c. 2. Uses, Conditional: NONE 4 • • • 3. Uses, Special: NONE 4. Minimum Lot Area NONE Maximum District Coverage 30 percent of the total N.C. District, provided that sidewalks, patios and other pedestrian surfaces are not included in the impervious surface total tabulation. 6. Minimum Setback Setback from County Road 100 ROW: 50 feet Setback from other Exterior District Boundaries 10 feet Setback from other Open Space District Boundaries 5 feet Setbacks from Lot Lines within the N.C. District 0 feet 7 Maximum Building Height 20 feet, 8. Maximum Allowed Floor Area 20,000 square feet provided no individual building shall contain more than 5,000 square feet. 9. Off -Street Parking a. Parking Space and Service Drive Setbacks: i. Setback from County Road 100 30 feet ii. Setback from other N.C. District Boundaries 5 feet, provided driveways and parking spaces created for the use and benefit of the adjacent (outside of the PUD Boundary) commercial property, "Catherine Store", shall be exempt from this setback requirement relative to the N.C. District boundary that is contiguous with said commercial property. b. Minimum Parking Space Requirements 10. Off -Street Parking a. Parking Space and Service Drive Setbacks: i. Setback from County Road 100 30 feet ii. Setback from other N.C. District Boundaries 5 feet, provided driveways and parking spaces created for the use and benefit of the adjacent (outside of the PUD Boundary) 5 • • commercial property, "Catherine Store", shall be exempt from this setback requirement relative to the N.C. District boundary that is contiguous with said commercial property. b. Minimum Parking Space Requirements: i. Retail and Service Commercial: one (1) parking space per two hundred (200) square feet of floor area except storage areas. ii. Business, Professional, Medical or Veterinary Office: one (1) parking space per three hundred (300) square feet of floor area designated for office or public use. iii. Fitness gym and dance studio: one (1) parking space per two hundred (200) square feet of floor area. iv. Delicatessen, cafe, juice bar, coffee shop, restaurant: One (1) parking space per one hundred (100) square feet of floor area. Any of these facilities providing outdoor seating shall also provide one (1) parking space per two hundred (200) square feet of outdoor seating area. 11. N.C. DISTRICT SITE PLAN MODIFICATION a. Compliance with N. C. District Site Plan: Parking lot and driveways configurations, building locations and landscape plantings may be modified at the time of building permit provided compliance with the following criteria: i. Compliance with all N.C. District criteria listed in 1 through 9 above. ii. General compliance with the design intent of the N.C. District Landscape Plan with no reduction in the total number of trees ultimately planted within the District provided the number of trees shown on individual lots may be reduced by up to 15% with the eliminated trees relocated to another area within the District. iii. A driveway configuration that is approved by the Carbondale Fire District. iv. Access to the site remains in alignment with the future relocation of the Hwy 82 Frontage Road (Old Hwy 82). b. Changes to Lot Configurations: Lot line re -configurations within the N.C. Zone District that may result from a site plan revision that is consistent with Section "11, a" above and does not create any additional lots shall not require an amendment to the Preshana Farm PUD or PUD Plan. Changes to the lot line configurations shall be reviewed in accordance with Section 6.00 Amended and Corrected Plats of the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, adopted 1974 as amended, provided the following additional information is submitted with the amendment application. 1. Revised Neighborhood Commercial District Site Plan, 6 • • minimum scale 1"= 60'; 2. Revised Neighborhood Commercial District Landscape Plan, minimum scale 1"= 60'. 1V_ Add the following to Section 11. "DESIGN STANDARDS A. Signs" 3. N.C. — Neighborhood Commercial District: a. The following signs are allowed at locations identified by Sign Envelopes on the N. C. District Site Plan. Sign ID & Type Structure Maximum Maximum Sign Type Height Area per Face SIGN A - Business or Joint Identification Freestanding/Pole 30' 100 sq.ft. each face SIGN B — Business or Joint Identification Freestanding/Pole 30' 100 sq.ft. each face SIGN C — Business or Joint Identification Monument 12' 80 sq.ft. each face b. Additionally, each business shall be allowed one building mounted sign conforming to the following requirements: Sign Structure Maximum Maximum Sign Type Type Height Area per Face Business Wall NA 2 sq. ft. per lineal foot of bldg. frontage, not to exceed 60 sq. ft. Projecting NA Same as Above Suspended NA Same as Above Roof Not to exceed Same as Above roof peak V. Add the following to Section 11. "DESIGN STANDARDS B. FENCES" 3. Fences within the Neighborhood Commercial District shall not exceed 48" when located within the required Building Setback from County Road 100 4. Fences within the Residential / Equestrian District shall not exceed 48" when located within 20 feet of the County Road 100 right-of-way. 7 • • VI. Add the following to Section 11. "DESIGN STANDARDS" D. LIGHTING Standards for the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District A. Definitions to aide in application of the lighting guidelines: 1. Fixture Height means the heights of the fixture shall be the vertical distance from the ground directly below the centerline of the fixture to the lowest direct light -emitting part of the fixture. 2. Foot-candle (fc) means a measure of light falling on a given surface or a unit of illumination of a surface that is equal to one (1) lumen per square foot. One (1) foot-candle is equal to the amount of light generated by one (1) candle shining on a square foot surface one (1) foot away. Foot-candles can be measured both horizontally and vertically by a foot-candle or light meter. Foot-candles shall be measured at grade level by a digital light meter, unless otherwise noted in this Article. 3. Full cut-off fixture means a luminaire light distribution where a maximum of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the total lamp lumens may be emitted ninety (90) degrees above the lowest point of a sphere; a maximum of ten percent (10%) of the total lamp lumens may be emitted between eighty (80) and ninety (90) degrees above the lowest point of a sphere; and ninety percent (90%) of the total lamp lumens must fall below eighty (80) degrees of the lowest point of a sphere. 4. Fully shielded light means light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no light rays are directly emitted by the installed fixture at angles above the horizontal plane as certified by a photometric test report. The fixture mus also be properly installed and adjusted to effectively down direct light in order to conform with the definition. Exemptions from this definition may be allowed for aesthetic lighting elements, such as shades with perforated patterns and opaque diffusers. 5. Reflected light means the light that is reflected off surfaces, becoming a secondary light source. 6. Semi cut-off fixture means a luminaire light distribution which allows twenty percent (20%) of the total lamp lumens to shine above eighty (80) degrees and ten percent (10%) above the horizontal ninety (90) degrees. 7. Uniformity ratio means the ratio of average illumination to minimum illumination (unless noted otherwise). 8. Vertical foot-candles means a measurement of illuminance intensity on a vertical surface, such as a wall or billboard. (Ad 51-01 §1) 8 • • B. Parking Lot Lighting 1. Parking lot lighting, when used, shall be designed to provide adequate lighting necessary to ensure vision and comfort in parking areas and so as not to cause glare or unnecessary light trespass on adjacent propertiesor streets. 2. Fixtures: All lighting fixtures serving parking Tots shall be full cut-off fixtures 3. Maximum Fixture Height: 12 feet, provided there will be allowed one 24 foot high fixture for the purpose of illuminating the intersection of the access drive with County Road 100. 4. Time Limits: Exterior lighting shall be extinguished within one (1) hour of the close of business (last operating business within the N.C. District) 10:00 p.m., whichever is later, except for security lighting as outlined in Section F. 5. Light Levels a. Minimum fc at ground level _5 b. Maximum fc at ground level 5 c. Recommended Uniformity Ratio 10:1 (maximum illumination to minimum illumination) C. Walkways 1. Fixtures: All walkway lighting fixtures serving parking lots shall be full cut-off fixtures 2. Light Levels: Walkways within N.C. District Minimum fc at ground level 0.5 Maximum fc at ground level 5.0 D. Signs, Flags, Works of Art and Landscape Lighting Walkways within Open Space District 0.0 2.0 1. Signs, government flags and works of art should not be lighted so as to create glare or unduly illuminate the surrounding area. 2. Signs may be illuminated only during hours that the business being advertised as open and customers are being serviced, or until 10:00 p.m., whichever is later. Up -lighting of works of art and flags is permitted, with a limit of two (2) fixtures per flag or art item with a maximum of nine thousand (9,000) lumens per fixture. The fixtures must be shielded such that the light source is not visible outside a fifteen -foot radius. 3. Sufficient technical and design information shall be submitted to the DC, to demonstrate that the following provisions are met: a. The maximum level of illumination on the vertical surface of the sign, measured at the brightest point, ten (10) feet from the surface of the sign, shall not exceed five (5.0) fc. 9 • • • b. To the extent practicable, fixtures used to illuminate signs shall be top -mounted and directed downward (i.e., below the horizontal), and the light source shall not be directly visible from adjacent properties or CR 100. Monument signs may be up -light but care shall be taken to avoid excessive light spillage outside of the boundaries of the sign panel. 4. Internally illuminated signs: Illumination on the surface of the sign, measured at the brightest point, ten (10) feet from the surface of the sign, shall not exceed five (5.0) fc or equivalent. For boxed, internally lit signs, backgrounds with dark colors and light-colored lettering are encouraged. 5. Landscape Lighting. Plant material and landscape walls may be highlighted with low intensity lighting when excessive Tight spillage beyond the mass of the targeted plant or object is minimized, the plant is generally not illuminated higher than 10 feet above ground level and the light source is concealed from direct view. Final acceptability of lighting levels used to illuminate landscape features will be determined by the DC following installation. 6. Landscape Lighting shall be extinguished within one (1) hour of the close of business or 10:00 p.m., whichever is later. Property owners are encouraged to extinguish lights as soon as possible after their business closes. 7. Outdoor Dining: Lighting of outdoor dining areas shall be achieved with task oriented lighting with full cut-off fixtures mounted not higher than 8 feet above grade. Lighting levels shall not be greater than 14 fc measured 3 feet above the finished grade of the outdoor dining surface. E. Building Facade Lighting 1. Building facades may be illuminated if the illumination is part of and adds to the overall design of the building, adds to the visual quality commercial village and does not produce dangerous or annoying glare or illumination of nearby streets or properties. 2. The maximum level of illumination, reflected from the surface of a building at a distance of ten (10) feet perpendicular to the illuminated surface shall not exceed one and one-half (1.5) foot-candles. 3. Lighting fixtures shall be carefully located, aimed and shielded so that Tight is directed only onto the building facade. Lighting fixtures shall not be directed towards streets or roads, other properties or the sky. 4. Building Facade Lighting shall be extinguished within one (1) hour of the close of business or 10:00 p.m., whichever is later. Property owners are encouraged to extinguish lights as soon as possible after their business closes. 5. Interior Light Spillage: Light spillage from doorways, porch canopies and windows, shall not exceed ten (10) foot-candles. 10 • • F. Security Lighting 1. Applications to the DC for after-hours security lighting shall include a written description of the need for and purposes of the security lighting; a site plan showing the area to be secured; and the location of all security lighting fixtures, specifications of all fixtures, the horizontal and vertical angles in which light will be directed and adequate cross-sections showing how light will be directed only onto the area to be secured. 2. All security lighting fixtures shall be fully shielded and aimed so that illumination is directed only to the designated area. In no case shall lighting be directed above a horizontal plane through the top of the lighting fixture, and the fixture shall include shields that prevent the light source from being visible from adjacent properties and roadways to the fullest extent practical. 3. Security lighting may illuminate ingresses and egresses of buildings up to a level eight (8) feet above grade or eight (8) feet above the bottoms of doorways, windows or entries, whichever is greater. 4. Security lighting for entrances, stairways and service areas shall not exceed five (5) fc at the designated area to be illuminated. 5. Parking lot lighting may be incorporated into a security lighting plan for after- hours security lighting if light levels do not exceed three (3) fc. 6. Examples of acceptable security lighting techniques: a. Recessed lights under a canopy. b. Full cut-off fixtures on parking lot poles. c. Fully shielded wall packs or other fixtures. d. Floodlights which are down -directed, fully shielded, have a maximum height limit of ten (10) feet and are controlled by motion detectors. G. Prohibited Lighting 1. Unshielded Tight sources. 2. Lights which flash, move, revolve, blink, flicker, vary in intensity, change color or use intermittent electrical pulsation are prohibited. 3. Mercury vapor and low-pressure sodium lighting is prohibited. 4. Upward directed lighting that allows spillage into the sky. 11 ip 4.08.05 (2) (i) PHASING (i) If more than one phase is proposed, a phasing plan shall be included in the application that delineates the proposed phasing of the development. (A. 97-109) Phase I The initial phase of development will involve the filing and processing of the preliminary plan for the resubdivision of the Equestrian Lot. The residential portion of the AEE subdivision will not be included in the preliminary plan except as necessary to show how the resubdivision infrastructure and drainage facilities interconnect with existing facilities. Phase II The second phase of development will be initiated by the filing of the amended plat re -subdividing the Equestrian Lot to create the four single family lots and the parcel containing the existing water tank which would be dedicated to the AEE HOA with the Phase H plat. Phase HI Completion of the resubdivision of the Equestrian Lot creating the new residential / equestrian lot, dedication of the additional open space track to the AEE HOA, dedication of the large open space tract to the commercial property owners association, and creation of the neighborhood commercial area lots. PHASING PLAN a 23 • Hwy 82 -- Catherine Store Blue Creek Ranch PUD (Open Space) M ENDMENT G PLAN jFinal Plat) • • • 4.08.05 (3) Regional Map (3) A regional location map showing the relationship of the site to connecting roadways, public facilities, commercial and cultural facilities and surrounding land uses; REGIONAL MAP GARFIELD COUNTY ZONE DISTRICTS MAP 24 PRESHANA FARM PUO EQUSIRIAN LOT C R. 100 MASTER PLAN RANOHi (R®fNl1AL)1 F (REs0o111AL) • RANCH AT 1ROARNG FORK '11.A (RESIDENTIAL) (Ii 1l 8 3}1 134 HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101. GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945-2555 www.hceng.com PRESHANA FARM PUD AMEND GARFIELD COUNTY, CO REGIONAL MAP drawn by: MRL scale 1" = 4000' checked by: REW Project No: 2041030.00 date: 9-2-05 page: 1 file: • Legend • Agric,:tur aOnciusfria; OS Ogen Spate ARRDHgrica.,ltural./Residential/RL,ral Dens;tp c, Commerce Genera! CommercallL;mited CIT`-TO*N LI Light lndustnal Pn Planned Development PUD panned Unit Development RGUD Residential/General/Urban Density RGSD Residentialeneral,Suburban Density RL Resource Lands RLSD Residentialt.imited/Suburban Dens;ty RLUD Residential/Limited/Urban Density RMHGUD Residential Mobile Home/General/Urban Density Garfield County Zone Districts Map M r 4.08.05 (4) & (5) Existing Conditions & Existing Topographic Map (4) A site map illustrating site boundaries, acreage, existing structures and the existing zoning; (5) A site topographic map showing at least five-foot contour intervals, major vegetation elements, streams, rivers, ditches and areas subject to 100 Year flooding; The existing site conditions and existing topography have been combined on one map. Included in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application attached previous to this PUD Amendment Application, are two sheets of the Aspen Equestrian Estates Final Plat to show information relative to the Equestrian Lot. The Equestrian Lot as depicted on the AEE Subdivision Final Plat is the only property within the Preshana Farm PUD subject to any change. Currently, the Equestrian Lot is leased by the owner to a commercial equestrian operation. The entire site is used in association with the equestrian activities. The entire northern half of the Equestrian Lot is currently occupied by equestrian paddocks. Major vegetation is limited to areas around the existing buildings and the site is not impacted by a 100 Year Floodplain. Irrigation wastewater from adjacent properties has been piped to avoid interference with the paddocks. PRESHANA FARM PUD EXISTING ZONE DISTRICTS (map) EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP 25 • • • 0.0EOl40Z 0 0 O GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN EXISTING CONDITION MAP HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. -°MRL 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PFIONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945-2555 checked by: REW dale: 9-6-05 NO. DATE REVISION BY CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 OR 534 . 06700 IN METRO DENVER CALL 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANC BEFOTt YOU 010 GRADE, O0 EXCAVATE FOR m4 MAIMING OF 4.08.05 (6) LEGAL DESCRIPTION flP(6) A legal description of the area that the applicant wishes to include in the PUD: Equestrian Lot, Aspen Equestrian Estates, A Planned Unit Development, According to the Plat Thereof Recorded June 6, 2000 as Reception No. 564578, County of Garfield, State of Colorado. 4.08.05 (7) WRITTEN STATEMENT (7) A written statement containing the following information: (a) An explanation of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD; PUD OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the proposed PUD amendment is to convert a land use provided for in the Preshana Farm PUD to alternative uses that will be more compatible with the residential component of the PUD. The amendment will also provide beneficial services to the surrounding county residents. The following criteria were established early in the reassessment process to guide the redesign of the Equestrian Lot: 1. Preserve or increase the total area zoned as open space within the area currently defined as the Equestrian Lot. 2. Create a mechanism for the long term maintenance and enhancement of the open space land on the Equestrian Lot. 3. Add residential lots on the north side of Equestrian Way to serve as buffer to the uses on the Equestrian Lot. This was requested by current residents of the PUD . 4. Create a neighborhood scale commercial services district adjacent to Catherine Store that is sensitive to the aesthetic qualities of the area, provides effective visual buffering from the residential area of PUD, addresses long term traffic issues on CR 100 and acknowledges the future realignment of the intersection of Old Highway 82 with CR 100. 5. Create specific limitations on the level of equestrian activities on the reconfigured Residential / Equestrian Lot to reduce negative impacts on the existing residential areas of the PUD. Phasing Schedule: (b) A development schedule indicating the approximate dates when construction of the various stages of the PUD can be expected to begin and be completed; See Section 4.08.05 (2)(i) for a detailed description of each phase of development. Phase I: Initiate within one year of approval of the PUD amendment by filing of a preliminary plan for the resubdivision of the Equestrian Lot. Phase II: File final plat for this phase within one year of the approval of the preliminary plan. Phase III: File final plat for the final phase of development within two years of the approval of the plat described in Phase II. 4.08.05 (7) (c) COVENANTS • 26 (c) Copies of any special covenants, conditions and restrictions, which will govern the use or occupancy of the PUD: provided, however, that the applicant may impose additional covenants, conditions and restrictions on any particular area in connection with the platting of such area; DECLARATION OF COVENANTS CONDITIONS & RESTRICTIONS FOR THE NEIGHBORIIOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - DRAFT DESIGN GUIDLINES 27 M DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR ASPEN EQUESTRIAN COMMERCIAL COMMONS (Garfield County, Colorado) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC does hereby declare and adopt the following Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (the "Declaration"), which shall run with the land and be binding upon all parties acquiring any interest therein or thereto. ARTICLE I - Recitals Section 1.1: The Declarant. Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC (the "Declarant") is a limited liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado. Section 1.2: The Property. The real property submitted to this Declaration is owned by the Declarant, is located in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and is described, as follows: [ADD PROPERTY DESCRIPTION] Section 1.3: The Development. The Development is a planned non-residential community with common elements subject to Sections 105, 106, and 107 of the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act ("CCIOA"). C.R.S. §38-33.3-116(2). The Development is not otherwise subject to CCIOA. Section 1.4: The Name. The name of the Development is ASPEN EQUESTRIAN COMMERCIAL COMMONS. Section 1.5: The Plat. By virtue of the Final Amended Plat of Aspen Equestrian Estates (the "Plat"), the Property is subdivided into five (5) separate Lots (Lots 1-5). The Plat was recorded in the public records of Garfield County on the day of, 200_, and any amendments or replats thereof. Section 1.6: The Tracts. This Declaration has no application to the Aspen Equestrian Estates PUD or the resulting Equestrian Lot depicted on the Plat. Section 1.7: The Purpose. The purpose of this Declaration is to further the interests of the Development and to protect and enhance property values. Declarant intends to define the character, rights and obligations of lot ownership within the Development and executes this Declaration for such purpose. IIP • ARTICLE II - Definitions The following terms shall have the following meanings when used herein unless the context otherwise requires: Section 2.1: Association. Association means and refers to ASPEN EQUESTRIAN COMMERCIAL COMMONS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Colorado not-for-profit corporation. Section 2.2: Building Footprint. Building Footprint means those areas of a building structure, together with associated patios, walkways, and private use areas, as designated by the Architectural Control Committee at the time of Architectural Review. Section 2.3: Common Elements. Common Elements means and includes the irrigation water system, open space parcel and associated facilities, parking areas, driveways, landscaped areas and associated amenities (located outside of the building footprint), common signage (excluding any signage affixed to a building) and outdoor lighting associated with the driveways, parking areas, sidewalks and the open space parcel. Facilities located on the Property may be designated as Common Elements as provided for herein. Section 2.4: Common Expenses. Common Expenses means and refers to expenditures made or liabilities incurred by or on behalf of the Association, specifically including but not limited to expenses related to the management of the Association and the maintenance, repair and replacement of the Common Elements, together with any allocations to reserves. Section 2.5: Executive Board. Executive Board means the Executive Board of the Association. Section 2.6: Lot. Lot means and includes any of the lots created and designated as a lot on the Plat. Section 2.7: Mortgage. Mortgage means and refers to any mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument by which a lot or any part thereof is encumbered. Section 2.8: Mortgagee. Mortgagee means and refers to any person or entity named as a mortgagee or beneficiary under any deed of trust or mortgage under which the interest of any owner is encumbered. Section 2.9: Owner. Owner (sometimes referred to as "Lot Owner") means and refers to any person or entity, including the Declarant, at any time owning a lot. Section 2.10: Points. Points are numerical figures assigned to each Lot to fix the proportional voting power of a Lot Owner in the Association and the proportional share of the total assessments levied by the Association to be borne by a Lot Owner. The number of Points IP allocated to a Lot shall be based on the total number of building square feet approved for and/or constructed on the Lot divided by 20,000 (the total number of building square feet permitted by the Plat). The Points allocated to each Lot shall be set forth on Exhibit A hereto, which Exhibit may be amended by the Executive Boardas provided herein. In the event that certain Lot(s) have not been approved for the construction of a defined number of building square feet ("Undefined Lots"), then those Undefined Lot(s) shall be assigned a number of points equal to: 20,000 minus the total number of building square feet approved for and/or constructed on the other Lots divided by the number of Undefined Lots. The number of points allocated to an Undefined Lot shall be fixed and Exhibit A shall be modifeied as soon as an approval for a defined number of building square feet is received by the Lot Owner from Garfield County or the Declarant irrevocably fixes the number of building square feet that can be constructed on the Lot. Section 2.11: Tract. Tract means and includes any of the Tracts created and designated as a Tract on the Plat. ARTICLE III - The Association Section 3.1: The Name. The name of the Association is ASPEN EQUESTRIAN COMMERCIAL COMMONS OWNERS ASSOCIATION. Section 3.2: Membership. Every Owner shall be entitled and required to be a member of the Association. An Owner shall be entitled to vote the total number of Points for each lot owned. Each such membership shall be appurtenant to and inseparable from the Lot upon which it is based, and shall be transferred automatically by the transfer, in whatsoever form, of that Lot. Ownership of a Lot shall be the sole qualification for membership. No person or entity other than an Owner may be a member of the Association. Section 3.3: Voting. Each Lot shall be entitled to vote the total number of Points described on Exhibit A. Owners of more than one (1) Lot shall have the right to vote the aggregate number of Points that the Lots which they own represent. If any Lot is owned by multiple parties, all such parties shall be members; provided, however, that the vote to which such Lot is entitled shall be exercised as the several owners among themselves shall determine, but in no event shall voting a fractional interest of the number of Points allocated to a Lot be allowed. Cumulative voting shall not be permitted. Any Owner in arrears for assessments made pursuant to this Declaration shall not be entitled to vote. Members representing a majority of Points shall constitute a quorum. Section 3.4: Duties of Executive Board. The Executive Board shall have the duties of management, operation, and maintenance of the Common Elements, enforcement of the provisions of this Declaration and Bylaws of the Association, and the rules and regulations adopted hereunder. The Executive Board shall be comprised of three members: a president, vice-president and secretary/treasurer. Members of the Executive Board shall be Lot Owners or, in the event a Lot is owned by an incorporated entity, an officer or director of the Lot Owner. 410. If appointed by the Declarant, the members of the Executive Board shall be required to exercise the care required of fiduciaries of the Lot Owners. M • If not appointed by Declarant, no member of the Executive Board shall be liable for actions taken or omissions made in the performance of such member's duties except for wanton and willful acts and omissions. Unless stated otherwise herein, the Executive Board shall act by majority vote. Each member of the Executive Board shall have one vote of equal weight. Section 3.5: Election of the Executive Board. The Executive Board shall be elected at an annual meeting of the Lot Owners which shall be held in the months of June or July. Initially, the Declarant shall appoint all members of the Executive Board. Not later than sixty (60) days after conveyance of Lots representing twenty-five percent (25%) of the total Points, at least one member of the Executive Board shall be elected by the non -Declarant Lot Owners. Not later than sixty (60) days after conveyance of Lots representing fifty percent (50%) of the total Points, at least two members of the Executive Board shall be elected by the non -Declarant Lot Owners. Not later than sixty (60) days after conveyance of Lots representing seventy-five percent (75%) of the total Points, all of the members of the Executive Board shall be elected by the non - Declarant Lot Owners. Section 3.6: Removal of Executive Board Member. The Lot Owners may remove a member of the Executive Board, other than a member appointed by the Declarant, with or without cause, by a vote of the Lot Owners representing at least two-thirds (66.6%) of the Points eligible to be voted. Section 3.7: Exercise of Powers. The Association shall have the responsibilities assigned to it by this Declaration and the Bylaws. The Association may also undertake the performance of such functions in the nature of community services that the Executive Board deems to be in the interest or for the benefit of the Owners and occupants of the Property or calculated to protect or enhance property values or advance the interests of the Development. The Association, acting through the Executive Board, shall have the right to borrow money to temporarily cover current operating expenses and for other purposes related to the exercise of its powers and duties or the performance of its functions. The Association shall have every right, privilege or power given, permitted or reasonably to be implied from this Declaration and the Bylaws and as otherwise permitted by law. Section 3.8: Rules and Regulations. The Association, acting through the Executive Board, may promulgate, supplement and amend, from time to time, reasonable rules and regulations governing the use of the Lots, which rules and regulations shall be consistent with the rights and duties established in this Declaration. Section 3.9: Assessments. The Association shall have the right to levy and make assessments, and the Lot Owners shall be obligated to pay assessments, in accordance with its Bylaws and this Declaration, for the following purposes: M To promote the recreation, health, safety, and welfare of the Owners, tenants and occupants of the Property; To pay taxes and special assessments levied against any property of the Association; To maintain the Common Elements; To enforce and administer the covenants, conditions and restrictions herein contained and to perform the functions contemplated, required or permitted hereunder; To pay expenses associated with the maintenance of architectural integrity and design control within the Development; To pay expenses associated with coordinating community events and providing information to the members, businesses and occupants of the Development, through advertising, news letters and brochures; To sponsor or advance community interest programs or events; To perform or provide other proper functions in the nature of community services; (i) To pay costs associated with community cleanup and improvement activities or similar projects; (j) To provide and maintain appropriate signage identifying the Development; (k) To pay wages for Association employees, Association management expenses, legal and accounting fees; (1) To pay any deficit remaining from any previous assessment period; (m) To create a reasonable contingency reserve, surplus and/or sinking fund; (n) To pay any other expenses and liabilities which may be incurred by the Association for the benefit of the Owners under or by reason of this Declaration, its Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, or as otherwise permitted by law. Section 3.10: Periodic Assessments. Until the Association makes a Common Expense Assessment, the Declarant shall pay all common expenses. After any assessment has been made by the Association, assessments shall thereafter be made no less frequently than annually and 5 EP 410 shall be based on a budget adopted by the Association no less frequently than annually. Section 3.11: Liability for Common Expenses. Each Lot's liability for Common Expenses is based upon the number of Points allocated to the Lot. In the event that a Common Element is being unduly burdened by the use of a specific Lot Owner or Lot Owners, the Executive Board may reallocate assessments related to such Common Element to reflect the actual use. Reallocation of assessments for a specific Common Element must be approved by seventy-five (75) percent of the total number of Points eligible to be voted. Section 3.12: Payment of Assessments. Each Owner is liable for assessments made against such Owner's Lot during the period of his ownership of that Lot. No Owner shall be exempt from liability for the payment of assessments by reason of the abandonment of the Lot against which the assessments are made or otherwise. Each Owner shall pay to the Association, in accordance with its Bylaws, such assessments as may be periodically made by the Association, without counterclaim, deduction or set off. Section 3.13: Added Charges. The Association may impose charges for late payment of assessments, levy fines for violations of the Declaration, the Bylaws or the Rules and Regulations of the Association and recover reasonable attorney's fees and other costs of collection. All such charges shall be enforceable as assessments. Any past due Common Expense Assessment or installment shall bare interest at the rate established by the Association, but not less than twelve percent (12%) per annum nor more than twenty-one percent (21 %) per annum. Section 3.14: Collection of Assessments. Assessments shall be due and payable after the date the same are levied within such reasonable time period as the Association may specify. If not paid within that time, the same shall be considered delinquent. All delinquent assessments shall bear interest at the rate established by the Association from time to time, but in no event less than twelve percent (12%) per annum. The Association may further assess a late charge for each month the delinquency continues. The Association shall have the right to bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay any delinquent assessment. In addition, the Association may record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, a Statement of Lien setting forth the name of the Owner, the legal description of the Lot, the name of the Association, and the amount of the delinquent assessment, which Statement shall be signed and acknowledged by an executive officer of the Association, and served upon the Owner of the Lot by ordinary mail, mailed to the address of the Lot, or to such other address the Association may have in its records for the Owner of the Lot. Upon the expiration of not less than ten (10) days after the mailing of such notice, the Association may proceed to foreclose the Statement of Lien in the same manner as provided for the foreclosure of mortgages on real property. The Association shall be entitled to recover in any action (whether a foreclosure action or a personal action) the full amount of all delinquent assessments, together with interest, late charges, costs, and expenses of suit, including without limitation, its reasonable attorney's fees incurred. Section 3.15: Assessment Liens. All sums assessed to any Lot by the Association shall M be secured by a lien on such Lot in favor of the Association. Such lien shall be subordinate to any valid tax and special assessment lien on the Lot in favor of any governmental assessing authority, but shall be superior to all other liens and encumbrances on such Lot. No Owner may exempt himself or his Lot from liability for any assessment or assessment lien by waiving any benefits or by abandonment of his Lot. A transfer (by whatever method) of any Lot shall not affect the assessment lien. The sale or transfer of a Lot shall not relieve the Owner from personal liability for any assessment made prior to such transfer, and the party acquiring any Lot for which any assessment remains unpaid shall be deemed to have personally assumed such liability. Section 3.16: Budgets. It shall be the duty of the Executive Board to formulate and propose a budget of expenses, not less frequently than annually. Within thirty (30) days after adoption of any proposed budget for the Property, the Executive Board shall mail, by ordinary first-class mail, or otherwise deliver a summary of the budget to all the members and shall set a date for a meeting of the members to consider ratification of the budget not less than fourteen (14) nor more than sixty (60) days after mailing or other delivery of the summary. Unless at that meeting members representing a majority of all Lots reject the budget, the budget is ratified, whether or not a quorum is present. In the event that the proposed budget is rejected, the periodic budget last ratified by the members shall be continued and deemed effective for the ensuing period until such time as the members ratify a subsequent budget proposed by the Board. Section 3.17: Points. The Executive Board may approve a modification, in accordance with Section 2.10, the allocation of Points described on Exhibit A to reflect the actual number of building square feet approved for each Lot. Section 3.18: Designation of Common Elements. In the event a dispute arises regarding whether a specific item or facility is a Common Element as defined in Section 2.10, or whether the specific item or facility is the responsibility of a Lot Owner, the Executive Board is authorized to hear evidence and resolve the dispute. Resolution shall be by a vote of the majority of the Points eligible to be voted. ARTICLE IV - Architectural Control Committee Section 4.1: Architectural Committee. The Architectural Committee shall be composed of five (5) natural persons; three of whom shall be appointed by the Executive Board; one of whom shall be appointed by the Board of Directors of the Aspen Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association ("AEEHOA"); and one of whom shall be appointed by the Board of Directors of the Blue Creek Homeowners Association ("BCHOA"). The members appointed by the AEEHOA and the BCHOA shall, at the same time, be members of their respective Homeowners Association Boards of Directors. The Architectural Committee shall provide notice to AEEHOA and BCHOA in the event of a vacancy of their respective position on the Architectural Committee. The Boards of Directors for AEEHOA and/or BCHOA shall have fifteen (15) days to appoint a new member to the Architectural Committee. In the event that AEEHOA and/or BCHOA fails to appoint a new member within fifteen (15) days, the Architectural Committee shall be entitled to meet and grant approvals. • 41i The three persons representing the Association on the Architectural Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Executive Board who may remove a member of the Architectural Committee and appoint a new member at any time, provided there shall at all times be five (5) persons serving on the Architectural Committee. The members of the Architectural Committee may also be members of the Executive Board and need not be Owners. The Architectural Committee shall have and exercise the powers, duties, and responsibilities set out in this instrument. The Architectural Committee shall not be obligated to have regular meetings, but shall meet as necessary to conduct the business of the Committee. All members of the Committee shall be provided at least ten (10) days advance notice of all Committee meetings. Section 4.2: Approval by Architectural Committee. No improvements of any kind shall be constructed, erected, altered, or permitted to remain within the Development, nor shall any excavating, grading or landscaping be done within the Development, unless the complete architectural and site development plans and specifications (and such other items as are included in the "Plans" defined below) for such construction, alteration, excavation, grading or landscaping are approved by the Architectural Committee prior to the commencement of such work, except as Declarant may be specifically permitted to do by this Declaration or required to do by any subdivision improvements agreement between the Declarant and the County. At least three (3) complete sets of the architectural and site development plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Architectural Committee along with a grading and drainage plan, a soils and foundation report prepared and certified by a professional engineer, and a complete list of all finished exterior materials and colors to be used (collectively referred to herein as the "Plans"). All copies of the Plans shall be signed and dated for identification by the Owner or his architect. The Architectural Committee shall have the right to request whatever additional specification information, plans, specifications, reports and the like it deems necessary to evaluate the development proposal throughout the approval and construction process. In addition, the Architectural Committee may adopt rules and regulations which shall specify additional information, reports, plans, specifications and the like required to be submitted to the Architectural Committee and to be deemed part of the Plans for all purposes hereunder. In the event the Architectural Committee fails to take any action within sixty (60) days after three (3) copies of the Plans have been submitted to it and the submittal has been certified in writing by the Architectural Committee as complete, then all of such submitted architectural plans shall be deemed to be approved. The Architectural Committee shall not unreasonably disapprove any Plans. The majority vote of the full number of members of the Architectural Committee then in office shall be required for any approvals described herein. Section 4.3: Improvements — Site Location. All structures or improvements shall be constructed within the approved building envelopes depicted on the Final Plat. Section 4.4: Building Permit. An Owner may apply for a building permit from the IP Garfield County Building and Planning Department at any time; provided, however, that the Plans approved by the Building and Planning Department shall not differ in any substantial way from the Plans approved by the Architectural Committee. if the plans approved by the Building and Planning Department differ in any substantial way as determined by the Architectural Committee, then all approvals of the Architectural Committee shall be deemed automatically revoked. Section 4.5: Variances. Unless specifically prohibited by a provision of this Declaration, the Plat, or PUD approval of the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners, the Architectural Committee may, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the full numbers of members of the Architectural Committee then in office, allow reasonable variances as to any of the covenants and restrictions governing architectural control contained in this Declaration and/or policies or rules promulgated by the Architectural Committee, on such terms and conditions as it shall require. No variance shall be granted which contravenes any provision of this Declaration, the Plat, the PUD approval(s) obtained by Declarant from the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners, or the Garfield County Land Use and Building Codes. The Architectural Committee shall not change any requirement contained in this Declaration, the Final Plat, or any resolution or ordinance of Garfield County pertaining to the Aspen Equestrian Commercial Commons. No variance shall be granted without written notice of the request for such variance provided ten (10) days prior to the hearing for said variance to all Owners. Notice to such Owners shall be deemed effective when placed in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, certified with return receipt requested, and addressed to the last known address for each Owner as provided to the Association. Section 4.6: General Requirements. The Architectural Committee shall exercise its best judgment to see that all improvements, construction, alterations, excavating, grading and landscaping conform to the architectural and landscaping design standards as may be approved by the Architectural Committee and that the same harmonize (to the greatest extent possible) with the natural surroundings within the Development and with other structures and improvements within the Development as to design, materials, color, siting, height, grade, fmished ground elevation of neighboring Lots and other design features. In the event the Association or Architectural Committee fails to properly implement and enforce the design and performance standards forth within this provision, the County, through its duly authorized representatives and agents, shall have all the right to enter upon the Property and implement and enforce such standards at the expense of the Association or exercise any other right or power afforded under this Declaration, including, but not limited to, the initiation of appropriate proceedings in the District Court for Garfield County, Colorado to compel enforcement of the same. The provisions of this paragraph shall not be amended or repealed by the Declarant, Association or Owners without the written consent of Garfield County. Section 4.7: Preliminary Approvals. Owners who anticipate constructing or modifying M • • structures or improvements on a Lot or excavating, grading or landscaping on a Lot may submit preliminary sketches or plans thereof to the Architectural Committee for informal and preliminary approval or disapproval. All preliminary sketches should be submitted in at least three (3) sets and should contain sufficient general information on those matters required to be in the complete Plans to allow the Architectural Committee to act intelligently in giving an informed preliminary approval or disapproval. The Architectural Committee shall never be committed or bound by any preliminary or informal approval or disapproval. The preliminary approval process is offered as an accommodation only, and the Architectural Committee may set fees for this service. Section 4.8: Architectural and Site Development Plans. The Architectural Committee shall disapprove any Plans submitted to it which do not contain sufficient information for it to exercise the judgment required of it by this Declaration. Section 4.9: Architectural Committee Not Liable. Neither the Architectural Committee nor any member thereof shall be liable for damages to any person or entity submitting any Plans for approval, or to any Owner or Owners, by reason of any action, failure to act, approval, disapproval or failure to approve or disapprove with regard to such Plans. Neither the Architectural Committee nor any member thereof shall have any liability or responsibility for any representations made to any Owner or prospective Owner by any third parties. The decisions of the Architectural Committee shall be governed by this Declaration and any roles or regulations duly adopted by the Architectural Committee pursuant to this Declaration. Section 4.10: Alterations. No alteration of the exterior appearance of any improvement (including color or texture), fence, utility facilities or other structures, shall be made without the approval of the Architectural Committee in like manner. Section 4.11: Landscaping. A landscape plan, consistent with any landscaping requirements approved by Garfield County, shall be required as a part of the approval process required for the construction of improvements on any Lot. No landscaping plan shall be implemented until approval by the Architectural Committee has been obtained. No approval for the construction of a building or other improvements upon any Lot shall be granted, except in conjunction with approval by the Architectural Committee of an appropriate landscaping plan. Section 4.12: No Landscape Alterations. The landscape plan approved for any Lot may not be altered without first submitting a revised plan to the Architectural Committee for approval. Section 4.13: Design Standards. In addition to design controls and development guidelines imposed by Design Standards as may be adopted by the Architectural Committee, the Architectural Committee may revise or prescribe additional standards and prescribe, revise and from time to time amend the procedures to be followed, the materials to be submitted, the review fees to be paid and the factors which will be taken into consideration in connection with the approval of any proposed improvement or landscaping. 10 • Section 4.14: Signs. A plan and description for all signs shall be submitted to the Architectural Committee in such detail as it may prescribe. Any such sign must be approved by the Architectural Committee before it may be erected upon any part of the Property. Signage within the Development shall comply with the requirements and limitations contained in the Design Standards approved by the Architectural Committee and the provisions of the Garfield County Sign Code, Land Use Code, or resolution of the Garfield County Board of Commissioners authorizing the Aspen Equestrian Commercial Commons. Section 4.15: Failure to Act. Unless otherwise noted, any decision of the Architectural Committee shall be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of all materials required, unless such time period is extended by mutual agreement. The decision shall be in writing, and if the decision does not approve the application, the reasons shall be stated. The decision shall be promptly transmitted to the applicant at the address furnished by the applicant. Any request for approval shall be deemed approved, unless disapproval or a request for additional information is transmitted to the applicant by the Architectural Committee within thirty (30) days after the date the application and all information and materials required, have been submitted. Section 4.16: Diligence in Completing the Work. Following approval of any proposed improvement, the Owner shall secure the requisite building permit from Garfield County and the improvement shall be completed by the Owner as promptly and diligently as practicable in substantial conformance with the submittals made, and in accordance with all conditions imposed by the Architectural Committee. All such improvements shall be completed within twelve (12) months of the date of approval. The landscaping approved in connection with the construction of the initial improvements shall be completed within six (6) months after a the Architectural Committee approves a landscape plan. In all other cases, such landscaping shall be completed within six (6) months of the date of approval. The Architectural Committee may grant extensions for excusable delays due to weather. Section 4.17: Notice of Completion. Prior to the application for the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy from Garfield County, the Architectural Committee must first issue a Notice of Satisfactory Completion or Conditional Notice of Satisfactory Completion. Failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph shall subject the Owner to the imposition of fines, penalties and such other rights and remedies as may be available to the Association. Such failure to comply will also serve as a basis for denying the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy by Garfield County and/or the basis for revoking any Certificate of Occupancy obtained without compliance with the provisions of this paragraph. Section 4.18: Notice Upon Completion of Work. Upon completion of the improvements and all other installations and work besides landscaping, the applicant shall give written notice to the Architectural Committee. Notice will not be deemed given until received by the Architectural Committee. Section 4.19: Inspection. The Architectural Committee, or its representative, shall have 11 tiP op the right to inspect the Lot and the work prior, during and after completion. ARTICLE V - Maintenance and Repairs Section 5.1: Owner's Duties. Each Owner shall, at all times, keep and maintain in good condition and repair, all improvements and non -Common Element landscaping within his Lot. Each Owner shall be responsible for and keep and maintain in good repair all sewer lines, individual water lines and other utility lines located within his Lot from the point of connection with the main trunk lines. Section 5.2: Association's Duties -Common Elements. The Association shall be responsible far the maintenance and repair of the Common Elements, all drainage facilities contained therein and all common signage. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Association shall provide lawn, grounds and landscaping care and shall keep and maintain the Common Elements free of debris and in an attractive condition. ARTICLE VI - Use Restrictions Section 6.1: Permitted Uses. Any Lot may be used for any purpose permitted by the Planned Unit Development for the Aspen Equestrian Commercial Commons as approved by the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, as recorded in the public records of Garfield County on day of , 200 at Reception No. Provided, however, that no lot shall be used for a fast food restaurant with a drive up window, nightclub or outlet for adult entertainment. Commercial condominiums or cooperatives may be developed on any Lotto the extent permitted by local ordinance, zoning and land use regulations and the laws of the State of Colorado. For purposes of this Declaration, any property owners association established in connection with any condominiums or cooperative developed upon a Lot, shall be considered and treated as the Owner of that Lot for purposes of assessments and other purposes deemed convenient by the Association. Section 6.2: No Further Subdivision. Except as reserved to Declarant pursuant to Article XI herein below, no Lot shall ever be further subdivided into smaller lots or conveyed or encumbered in less than the full dimensions as shown on the recorded Final Plat; provided, however, that conveyances or dedications of easements, if approved by the Architectural Committee, may be made for less than the full dimensions of a Lot. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a lot line adjustment between two (2) Lots shall be allowed, subject, however, to any reviews or approvals that may be required by the Garfield County Land Use Code and the prior approval of the Architectural Committee. Further notwithstanding the foregoing, Owners have the right to create condominiums in a building located on a Lot. Section 63 Underground Utility Lines. All water, sewer, gas, electrical, telephone, cable television, and other utility pipes or lines within the limits of the Development shall be buried underground and not be carried on overhead poles or above the surface of the ground. Any areas of natural vegetation or terrain in the Development disturbed by the burying of utility lines shall be revegetated by and at the expense of the respective Owners causing the installation 12 r • of the utilities no later than the next growing season following installation. Section 6.4: Service Yards and Trash. Equipment, service yards or storage piles on any Lots may be permitted during construction if they receive Architectural Committee review approval. Otherwise, no lumber, metals, equipment or bulk materials shall be kept, stored or allowed to accumulate outside on any Lot. All scraps, refuse and trash shall be removed from all Lots, shall not be allowed to accumulate and shall not be burned thereon. Section 6.5: No Mining, Drilling or Quarrying. Mining, quarrying, tunneling, excavating or drilling for any other substances within the earth, including oil, gas, minerals, gravel, sand, rock and earth, shall not be permitted within the limits of the. Development. Section 6.6: Irrigation Water. Non -potable irrigation water shall be supplied to each Lot through a ditch and piped system which shall be owned, operated, and maintained by the Association. The Association shall be responsible for setting all rates, fees or charges for the provision of irrigation water through said system, which rates, fees and charges will be sufficient pay for all costs incurred in providing the same and in maintaining a sufficient operating reserve. Each Owner shall pay to the Association the rates, fees or charges applicable to his respective Lot The obligation of Owners to pay the Association for such water service shall be a personal obligation of the Owner which the Association shall have the power and duty to enforce. The Association shall also be obligated to provide the Equestrian Lot, as depicted on the Final Plat, with non -potable irrigation water. The owner of the Equestrian Lot shall be obligated to pay all rates, fees or charges for the provision of irrigation water through said system, which rates, fees and charges will be proportional to the amount of irrigation water consumed. Section 6.7: Trash Containers. Trash may only be stored in a location approved by the Executive Board. Section 6.8: Antennas and Satellite Dishes. Television antennas, radio antennas, satellite dishes and the like shall be permitted only with the prior written approval of the Architectural Committee, which may impose appropriate screening requirements. Section 6.9: Rules and Regulations. The Executive Board is expressly empowered to adopt and promulgate such Rules and Regulations as it may from time to time deem necessary or desirable to regulate the use and activities upon the Property in a manner consistent with the purposes of this Declaration and may impose appropriate penalties and fines for the violation of the same. All such Rules and Regulations shall be applied uniformly in a non-discriminatory manner The Executive Board may establish and enforce penalties and fines for the infraction of any rule or regulation, which fines shall be collectable as assessments in the manner provided above. Section 6.10: Sewer Regulations. Sewer service is provided to the Property by the Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Association ("RRFHOA") pursuant to a Sewer Service Agreement between RRFHOA and Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, recorded in the public 13 • records of Garfield County on October 20, 1999, at Reception No. 554013 ("Sewer Agreement") and a First Amendment to the Sewer Service Agreement between the RRFHOA and Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, recorded in the public records of Garfield County on the day of , 200, at Reception No. ("First Amendment"). RRFHOA is a private homeowners association entitled to establish rules and regulations for the provision of sewer service and is not subject to laws affecting public utilities. The Association and all Lot Owners are required to accept, without vote or any other approval, an assignment of the Sewer Agreement and First Amendment and assumption by the Association of each and all of Declarant's obligations and rights under said agreements, except such rights and obligations in the Sewer Agreement and First Amendment regarding the Equestrian Lot or as may be reserved by the Declarant in the assignment. The Association and all Lot Owners shall comply with the terms of the Sewer Agreement, the First Amendment and the Sewer System Rules and Regulations, then in place, as adopted by the RRFHOA. Compliance with the terms of the foregoing documents shall be enforceable either by the Association or by the RRFHOA. Prior to enforcement under this Declaration, the offending sewer user shall be provided with a notice of violation and be given a sixty (60) day right to cure. In the event that enforcement is necessary, the Association and/or the RRFHAO shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs in connection with such enforcement action under this Declaration_ The assessment powers of the Association shall include the right to levy assessments on the Lots as necessary to meet the Association's obligations under the Sewer Agreement and First Amendment. Any such levies for purposes of satisfying the obligations under the Sewer Agreement and First Amendment shall not require any Lot Owner approvals. Each lot may be subject to a lien for sewer charges as provided for in section 12c of the Sewer Agreement. Section 6.11: Potable Water Service. [Provisions related to the potable water service in the Declaration of Covenants will be drafted as part of the Preliminary Subdivision Plan proecess) Section 6.12: Maintain Appearance. No improvements constructed upon any Lot shall be permitted to fall into disrepair, and each and every such improvement shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair and adequately painted, stained, or otherwise finished and maintained by the Owner thereof. Section 6.12: Prohibitions. Unless required and approved by the Colorado Division of Wildlife to further necessary wildlife management goals, no firearms shall be discharged within the boundaries of the Property. No noxious or offensive activity of any type shall be carried on or upon the Property, nor shall anything be done or permitted which may be or become a nuisance of danger to the Owners or occupants of other property. 14 eft • Section 6.13: No Hazardous Activities. No activities shall be conducted on the Property which are unsafe or hazardous or constitute a potential danger to any person or property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no open fires shall be lighted or permitted upon any Lot. Section 6.14: No Temporary Structures. No tent or shack or other temporary building, improvement, or structure shall be placed upon the Property, except that temporary structures necessary for the storage of tools and equipment and for office space for architects, builders and foremen during actual construction, may be maintained with the prior approval of the Architectural Committee, which shall have the authority to limit and prescribe the nature, size and location of such temporary structures, except in respect to the activities of the Declarant. Section 6.15: Enforcement. The failure of any Owner to comply with the provisions of this Article shall give rise to a cause of action in favor of the Association, Garfield County, the Declarant or any aggrieved Lot Owner, for the recovery of damages or for injunctive relief, or both. Failure to enforce any such right shall in no event be deemed a waiver of any right to do so in the future_ Section 6.16: Outside Storage. All outdoor storage of materials shall be enclosed bya sight obscuring fence approved by the Architectural Committee. ARTICLE VII - Insurance Section 7.1: Association to Maintain Insurance. Commencing not later than the time of the first conveyance of a Lot to a person other than the Declarant, the Association shall maintain, to the extent reasonably available, the kinds and types of insurance specified in this Article. Section 7.2: Liability Coverage. The Association shall keep and maintain commercial general liability insurance against claims and liabilities arising in connection with the operation and management of the business and affairs of the Association, as deemed sufficient in the judgment of the Executive Board, but in no event, less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate, insuring the Executive Board, the Association, the management agent, if any, and their respective employees and agents. Section 7.3: Fidelity Bonds and Insurance. The Association shall obtain adequate fidelity bonds or insurance coverage to protect against dishonest acts of all Executive Board members, officers, employees and managers of the Association handling or responsible for Association funds. Fidelity insurance coverage shall not be less than the aggregate amount of one (1) year's current assessments for the entire Development, plus reserves as calculated from the current budget of the Association, or $50,000, whichever is greater. The Association may carry fidelity insurance in a greater amount. Section 7.4: Officers and Directors. The Association shall keep and maintain Officers 15 M 1/P M and Directors errors and omissions and personal liability coverage, with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate, to protect the officers and directors from personal liability in relation to or arising out of their duties on behalf of the Association. Section 7.5: Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance. The Association shall obtain worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance and all other similar insurance with respect to its employees in such amounts and form as may now or hereafter be required by law. Section 7.6: Other Insurance. The Association may also obtain insurance coverage against any such other risks of a similar or dissimilar nature, as deemed appropriate. Section 7.7: Insurance Expense. The cost of all insurance which the Association is required or permitted to maintain, shall be assessed to the Lot Owners as a common expense. Section 7.8: Structures Not Insured. The Association shall not maintain insurance on any structure on a Lot. ARTICLE VIII - Assessment Certificates and Notices Section 8.1: Assessment Certificates. Upon request, the Association shall provide any Owner, prospective purchaser, mortgagee or prospective mortgagee, of any Lot in the Development a certificate in writing signed by an officer of the Association setting forth the amount of any assessments, interest or late charges due in connection with any specified Lot. A reasonable charge may be made by the Association for the issuance of such certificates. Section 8.2: Notice of Assessment Liens. The Association shall furnish to a Lot Owner or his designee, or to a holder of security interest, mortgage or deed of trust or its designees, upon written request delivered personally or by certified mail, first-class postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the Association's registered agent, a written statement setting forth the amount of unpaid assessments currently levied against such Owner's Lot. This statement shall be furnished within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the request and is binding on the Association, the Executive Board and every Owner. If no statement is furnished to the Lot Owner or holder of the security interest, mortgage or deed of trust, or to his designee, delivered personally or by certified mail, first-class postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the inquiring party, then the Association shall have no right to assert a lien upon the Lot for unpaid assessments which were due as of the date of the request. ARTICLE IX - Common Signage and Entertainment Easement Section 9.1: Common Signage. Subject to the approval of Garfield County and consistent with the Aspen Equestrian Commercial Commons Planned Unit Development approvals, the Association shall establish and maintain monument signs for the Development 16 so 101 within the Common Elements. One monument sign will be established near the intersection of County Road 100 and State Highway 82 and the other near the intersection of County Road 100 and Aspen Equestrian Drive. Said monument signs shall be two-sided signs and shall be limited to seven (7) feet in height and an area of seventy-five (75) square feet per side. The signs shall be subject to the prior approval of the Architectural Committee and shall be consistent and in keeping with the Design Standards approved by the Architectural Committee for this Development. The costs of establishing and maintaining appropriate monument signage and any other signs for the common benefit of the Development which are approved and funded by the Association shall be assessed to the Owners as a Common Expense. ARTICLE X - Reserved Easements Section 10.1: Easements Shown on Final Plat. The Association is entitled to use such easements as are reflected on the Final Plat for the Development. The Association shall have no obligation to pay any amount for the use and enjoyment of such easements. The Association shall pay for the cost of maintaining and repairing any improvements which it places on any easements. Section 10.2: Easements for Utilities, Access and Repairs. There are hereby reserved unto Declarant (so long as the Declarant owns a Lot within the Developement), the Association, and the designees of each (which may include, without limitation, Garfield County, Colorado and any utility company) easements upon, across, over and under all of the Lots, with the exception of the building envelope, to the extent reasonably necessary for the purpose of installing, replacing, repairing, and maintaining cable television systems, master television antenna systems, security and similar systems, roads, walkways, bicycle pathways, lakes, ponds, wetlands, drainage systems, irrigation systems, street lights, signage, and all utilities, including, but not limited to, meter boxes, telephone, gas and electricity. The foregoing easements may traverse the private property of any Owner; provided, however, an easement shall not entitle the holders to construct or install any of the foregoing systems, facilities, or utilities over, under or through any existing dwelling on a Lot or building envelope as shown on the Plat, and any damage to a Lot resulting from the exercise of an easement shall be reasonably repaired by, and at the expense of, the Person exercising the easement. The exercise of an easement shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of any Lot and, except in any emergency, entry onto any Lot shall be made only after reasonable notice to the Owner or occupant. Declarant specifically reserves the right to convey to the electric company, natural gas supplier and cable television or communications systems supplier and any other utility supplier an easement across any portion of the Development for ingress, egress, installation, reading, replacing, repairing and maintaining utility meters and boxes. However, the exercise of this easement shall not extend to permitting entry into the dwelling on the Lot, nor shall any utilities be installed or relocated on any Lot, except as approved by the Association or Declarant. Should any entity furnishing a service covered by the general easement herein provided 17 4p) request a specific easement by separate recordable document, the Association or Declarant shall have the right to grant such specific, descriptive easement over the Development without conflicting with the terms hereof The easements provided for in this Article shall in no way adversely affect any other recorded easement on the Property. The Owner of a Lot subject to such easement shall cooperate with Declarant and the Association and take all actions, including, without limitation, executing any documents evidencing such descriptive easement as reasonably requested by the Association or Declarant. Section 10.3: Reserved Easements for Common Elements. There are hereby reserved to the Association such easements as may be necessary for the siting and location of the Common Elements described in Section 2.3. Also reserved are such easements as may be necessary for the operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Common Elements. With regard to the parking Common Element, each Lot shall be entitled to reserve up to four (4) parking spaces for the designated use of the Lot. The selection of the four (4) designated parking spaces shall be approved by the Executive Board. ARTICLE XI - General Provisions Section 11.1: Notices to Owners. Notice to an Owner of matters effecting the Property by the Association or by another Owner, shall be sufficiently given if such notice is in writing and is delivered personally, by courier or private service delivery, or by deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to such Owner at the registered mailing address furnished by the Owner to the Association in accordance with the Bylaws. Such mailing shall be deemed adequate, whether mailed ordinary mail, certified mail or registered mail. Section 11.2: Covenants to Run with the Land. This Declaration shall run with the land and be a burden on and benefit to the Lots within the Development. Section 11.3: Termination of Declaration. This Declaration shall not be terminated except upon the written agreement of Owners representing not less than sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Lots located within the Development and must be evidenced by a Termination Agreement or the ratification thereof, in the same manner as a deed, by the requisite number of Owners_ Any Termination Agreement must specify a date after which the agreement will be void, unless it is recorded. The Termination Agreement, and all ratifications thereof, must be recorded in Garfield County, Colorado, and shall be effective only upon recordation. Notwithstanding the provisions hereof, this Declaration shall not be terminated without the prior written consent of the Declarant, so long as the Declarant retains ownership of any Lot within the Development. Section 11.4: Enforcement. The failure of any Owner to comply with the provisions of this Declaration or with the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Association, shall give rise to a cause of action in the Association, as well as any aggrieved Lot Owner for the recovery of damages or injunctive relief, or both. The failure of the Association or any Owner to enforce 18 IP fia any such rights, shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so in the future. The Aspen Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association, a Colorado non-profit corporation, shall be deemed a third party beneficiary of these protective covenants with the right of enforcement thereof. Section 11.5: Amendments. This Declaration may be amended by the vote or agreement of Lot Owners representing at least sixty-seven percent (67 %) of the Lots within the Development, evidenced by a certified copy of the Resolution of Amendment, signed and acknowledged by the President and Secretary of the Association and recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Section 11.6: Duration. This Declaration shall continue in effect until revoked or terminated in the manner provided above. Section 11.7: Paragraph Headings. The paragraph headings within this Declaration are for convenience only and shall not be construed as a specific part of the terms hereof Section 11.8: Severability. If any clause or provision of this Declaration is determined to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws, all other terms and provisions hereof shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect. Section 11.9: Successor Declarant. The Declarant may, without terminating the period of Declarant control, engage in a bulk sale of all of Declarant's interest in the Property to a third party. In the event of such a bulk sale, the successor third party shall assume all of Declarant's rights and obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions has been executed this _ day of , 2005. 19 DECLARANT: ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2005 by as of ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 110 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT • • DESIGN GUIDELINES April 12, 2005 L Statement of Purpose The concept of the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zone District development plan is to create a pedestrian scale shopping village oriented around an internal parking plaza and village green that accommodates convenient vehicular access, safe and direct pedestrian circulation and intimately scaled pedestrian spaces complimented by extensive landscape plantings. The commercial structures shall be generally organized around and oriented toward a parking plaza highlighted by a central "village green", an oversized landscape island in the center of the parking plaza, all served by convenient pedestrian walkways and congregation spaces. A reduced architectural scale combined with extensive landscape plantings around numerous pedestrian spaces should create a casual and inviting shopping experience. Landscape plantings will be a critical element of the overall commercial village character with plant material being of character, density of planting and size at maturity to visually dominate the site and minimize the mass appearance of the commercial structures. An underlying goal of architectural design for the Neighborhood Commercial development is for buildings to convey a sense of the history and heritage found in the ranching context of Garfield County and the western slope of Colorado. Historically, these regions included a fairly wide variety of building styles and forms. In most cases, buildings have consisted of fairly simple, understated forms constructed of a relatively limited number of building materials. Generally, function was expressed over form and the emphasis of structural supports such as roof brackets become elements of detail and articulation that add interest. It is not the intention of these guidelines to require buildings be designed to duplicate buildings of the past. It is, however, the intention of these guidelines that buildings take their cues from design features and elements found in such buildings. Emphasis of architectural design should be on the entry of each individual building and not the building as a whole while the building as a whole should reflected the design character consistent with the ranching context discussed above. While it is the intention of these Guidelines that all buildings share a common design vocabulary, it is not the intention of these Guidelines that all buildings look alike. Each building within the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District will have the design flexibility necessary to meet its programmatic needs within the parameters established by these Guidelines. An architectural elevation reflecting the desired architectural vocabulary for the commercial structures has been included at the end of this document. The elevation and sketch are offered as an example of the structural elements, materials, colors and fenestration that are representative of the intent of these Guidelines. 1 41, II. Site Plan A. Vehicular Facilities 1. Internal vehicular circulation shall loop around the central village green providing for continuous two-way traffic flow. 2. Perpendicular parking shall be provided along this looping drive. Secondary access drives and parking bays may project from the central drive. 3. The vehicular circulation plan shall acknowledge and integrate the potential future use of the permanent access easements created for the benefit the adjacent "Catherine Store" property. 4. Landscape islands shall be used to terminate all parking bays, interrupt very Targe bays of parking and to define vehicular circulation routes. Typically, landscape islands should have a minimum width of 4 feet occupied by vegetative material with any required walks representing additional width. 5. Snow storage areas equivalent to 20% of the total square footage of parking and driveways within the N.C. District shall be provided, however, up to 10%-ef the total number of required parking spaces may be used to partially satisfy the snow storage requirement. Parking space beyond the required number of spaces may also be used for snow storage. 6. Drives and parking bays shall be paved with asphalt, concrete or high density pavers. Parking bays are encouraged to be surfaced in a material, color or texture that differs from the access drives to emphasize the pedestrian functions that occur within the parking bays. 7. All loading, dumpsters and other delivery/service facilities should be screened from view from the front sides of buildings, the village green, common and open space areas and from County Road 100. Appropriate methods of screening include landscaping, fencing and walls and, where space allows, berms combined with landscaping. When fencing and walls are used, they should be constructed of materials compatible with the building and preferably designed as an extension of the building. B. Utilities 1. The location of pedestals, transformer boxes and other utility facilities should be coordinated with local utility companies to minimize their visual impact on the public side of buildings and from pedestrian ways. 2. All new utility distribution/service lines shall be located underground. C. Pedestrian Facilities 1. Paved pedestrian surfaces shall be located to provide convenient and efficient pedestrian movement between parking bays and the commercial structures including Catherine Store. 2. Colored and/or textured surfaces contrasting with the access drives surfaces shall be required wherever pedestrian routes cross vehicular circulation lanes. 3. The introduction of gathering spaces, bollards, kiosks, seating areas and similar improvements can add interest and variety to the pedestrian experience. When feasible, the introduction of these types of features should be considered into the design of walkways. 2 • • • 4. The width of pedestrian walkways should be determined based on the level of pedestrian traffic anticipated for the project. In most cases through walkways should be no less than six (6') feet in width. III. ARCHITECTURE A. Building Orientation 1 Primary building entries should be oriented towards the village green and the primary pedestrian walkways. 2. Secondary accesses and windows should acknowledge the presence of the surrounding open space park by providing, where possible, opening to outdoor pedestrian circulation and activity areas and ample windows on the open space park side of the commercial structures. 3. Facade treatments on the back or park side of the commercial structures should be consistent with the front facades in the use of architectural detailing and materials. B. Building Form and Massing 1. Building forms should be simple in nature and when feasible, buildings should be designed as smaller additive forms as opposed to single large elements. 2. Building off -sets, balconies and overhangs, changes in wall materials and textures or changes in colors should be used to reinforce a pedestrian -oriented building scale. 3. While acknowledging the functional requirements of a building, large expanses of unbroken wall planes should be avoided. 4. Structure shall be primarily one story. Limited second floor square footage may be allowed when the second level is contained within the roof line of the structure C. Roofs 1. Buildings should consist of either sloping or flat roofs. Mansard, dome, barrel and gambrel roofs are not permitted. A maximum of 20 percent of the building footprf4srt may be covered with a flat roof. 2. Sloping roofs on may range from 4:12 to 12:12. 3. Parapets and architectural screens should be used on buildings with flat roofs in order to screen rooftop appurtenances such as pipes, vents and mechanical equipment. 4. Large continuous roof ridges and large unbroken roof planes should be avoided. Varied roof heights should be considered in order to reduce the perception of bulk and building mass and to provide variety and interest to roof forms. 5. The introduction of varied roof pitches, dormers, porches and clearstories can add interest and variety to roof forms and should be considered. Additionally, extended overhangs at gable and rake conditions should be provided for protection of pedestrian areas below and visual interest. Fascia thickness should be designed to provide detail interest and balance of the roof design. 6. Roofs should be designed to avoid snow -shedding onto pedestrian areas. 3 • eh 4to D. Building Materials 1. The use of building materials and treatments should be consistent on all sides of a building. While multiple building materials and colors may be used on a single building, there should be no perceived front or back side of a building except as reflected by the emphasis on pedestrian entries. 2. Walls are a major structural element of a building and as such, the type and composition of wall materials should convey an authentic expression of structural integrity. For example, a stone or masonry wall should be at the base of a building and wood siding on upper levels. 3. Generally, acceptable wall materials include: stucco, wood siding, stone, metal siding, and brick. 4. When used, wood siding may be applied in shiplap, tongue and groove or board and batt with dimensions ranging from 4" to 12". 5. A variety of imitation materials may be acceptable subject to approval of the DRC. Examples of these include synthetic stucco, cultured stone and simulated wood products such as Hardy Panel, Cemplank, Masonite Panel. 6. The introduction of accent elements such as timbers, log or steel is encouraged. 7. Generally, acceptable roof materials include: metal (galvanized or painted), architectural gauge asphalt shingles, wood shake or simulated wood shake. When used, metal roofs should be standing seam and be non -reflective or become non -reflective through the weathering/aging process. 8. The use of metal roofs in conjunction with other roofing material is acceptable provided the use of metal is consistent throughout the building. 9. Roof colors should be selected in concert with building colors. 10. Metal may be considered in limited applications as a siding or trim material if non - reflective or become non -reflective through the weathering/aging process. 11. Large uninterrupted masses of window glazing will not be allowed. 12. Masonry materials such as natural stone and brick are encouraged as an architectural element but should not be the dominating material on all structures. As a general guide, buildings should not allow more than 60 percent of their total non -glazed facade area to be of a masonry material. No individual side of a building should commit more than 80 percent of its non -glazed facade area to a masonry material. E. Color 1. Building colors should be selected to blend a building to its site and the surrounding area. 2. Colors approaching the primary range (blue, red and yellow), are not permitted. 3. Multiple colors on a single building may be used, provided that the palette of colors used are complementary and that color changes are done in a logical, coordinated and comprehensive manner. 4. Brighter accent colors may be used to highlight elements of a building such as window or door trim, mullions, railings, etc., but in no case will accent colors that call undue attention to a building be permitted. 5. Color is encouraged as a defining architectural characteristic of the commercial village. Large blocks of color shall be in harmony with subdued earthy tones. 4 • it) F. Fenestration/ Building Entries 1. Building entries should be oriented to the village green and primary pedestrian walkways. 2. Building entries provide an opportunity to reinforce the overall architectural style of a building and to also reinforce a human -scale -on larger buildings. Roofed entries designed with wood timbers, steel columns, stone, or exposed structural elements such as trusses, braces, etc. should be considered. 3. While window sizes on a building may vary in response to functional requirements, the overall proportions and patterns of window treatments should be uniform throughout a building. 4. The size of windows should be designed in relation to the overall scale of the building. Window walls and larger windows should be broken up with mullions to create the appearance of smaller window panes. 5. Arched or triangular shaped windows may be used, but are generally only appropriate in the context of the building design, such as at gable end. 6. The use of mirrored or reflective glass is not permitted. Tinted windows may be used, but should be limited to a gray -tint only. G. Architectural Details 1. When used, architectural details should be consistent throughout a building ancl, express a cohesive architectural style. 2. The introduction of exposed structure elements, brackets/braces, etc. is encouraged. 3. The use of decorative elements (such as lighting fixtures, handrails, railings, trellis work, etc.) that convey a sense of ranching history and heritage are encouraged. IV. Landscaping A. Upon maturity of the landscape plantings, the visual mass of architectural structures should be largely minimized by the landscape plant material. B. As viewed from CR 100 and from the internal drives, plant material should guide the eye to specific architectural features and signage while boldly interrupting the broad facade of the commercial structures. C. The framework for tree massing and the general character for landscape plantings shall be as conceptually portrayed by the Neighborhood Commercial District Landscape Plan. D. The quantity of plant material units associated with an individual building may vary but the total number of plant material units specified on the Master Plant List shall be achieved within the NC Zone District. The total number of units of the different types of plant material (evergreen tree, deciduous shade tree, under -story accent tree) may vary by not more than 30 percent from the numbers specified on the Master Plant List. E. Landscape designs should establish continuity between adjoining sites and with the surrounding open space park. Boundaries between properties should not be evident -by the manner in which they are landscaped. F. Earth forms, mass shrub plantings, landscape walls and elevated planters are encouraged throughout the site development to direct pedestrian traffic, add color and visual diversity, define and enclose outdoor use areas and screen utility areas. 5 ob • • Appropriate retaining wall materials include boulder walls, stone veneer or drystack stone. The use of modular concrete block walls and wood retaining walls is discouraged. G. The use of mass plantings of perennial and annual flowers is encouraged. H. Materials on fences, wall or retaining walls that are extensions of buildings should mimic the exterior walls of the building. I. The use of small to moderate scale water features near pedestrian and outdoor dining areas is encouraged to screen traffic noise from Hwy 82 and CR 100. J. The use of chain link fencing is not allowed. K. All landscaped areas in the N.C. District shall be installed with underground irrigation systems that utilize the raw water system provided to the NC District. L. All drainage shall comply with the overall drainage plan established for the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District. M. Individual building construction sites shall utilize silt fencing to protect adjacent sites and the open space park from undue sedimentation. V. Exterior Lighting A. Definitions to aide in application of the lighting guidelines: 1. Fixture Height means the heights of the fixture shall be the vertical distance from the ground directly below the centerline of the fixture to the lowest direct light - emitting part of the fixture. 2. Foot-candle (fc) means a measure of light falling on a given surface or a unit of illumination of a surface that is equal to one (1) lumen per square foot. One (1) foot-candle is equal to the amount of light generated by one (1) candle shining on a square foot surface one (1) foot away. Foot-candles can be measured both horizontally and vertically by a foot-candle or light meter. Foot-candles shall be measured at grade level by a digital light meter, unless otherwise noted in this Article. 3_ Full cut-off fixture means a luminaire light distribution where a maximum of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the total lamp lumens may be emitted ninety (90) degrees above the lowest point of a sphere; a maximum of ten percent (10%) of the total lamp lumens may be emitted between eighty (80) and ninety (90) degrees above the lowest point of a sphere; and ninety percent (90%) of the total lamp lumens must fall below eighty (80) degrees of the lowest point of a sphere. 4. Fully shielded light means light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no light rays are directly emitted by the installed fixture at angles above the horizontal plane as certified by a photometric test report. The fixture must also be properly installed and adjusted to effectively down direct light in order to conform with the definition. Exemptions from this definition may be allowed for aesthetic lighting elements, such as shades with perforated patterns and opaque diffusers. 5. Reflected light means the light that is reflected off surfaces, becoming a secondary light source. 6. Semi cut-off fixture means a luminaire light distribution which allows twenty percent (20%) of the total lamp lumens to shine above eighty (80) degrees and ten percent (10%) above the horizontal ninety (90) degrees. 7. Uniformity ratio means the ratio of average illumination to minimum illumination (unless noted otherwise). 6 • B. 8. Vertical foot-candles means a measurement of illuminance intensity on a vertical surface, such as a wall or billboard. (Ad 51-01 §1) Parking Lot Lighting 1. Parking lot lighting, when used, shall be designed to provide adequate lighting necessary to ensure vision and comfort in parking areas and so as not to cause glare or unnecessary light trespass on adjacent properties or streets. 2. Fixtures: All lighting fixtures serving parking lots shall be full cut-off fixtures 3. Maximum Fixture Height: 12 feet, provided there will be allowed one 24 foot high fixture for the purpose of illuminating the intersection of the access drive with County Road 100. 4. Time Limits: Exterior lighting shall be extinguished within one (1) hour of the close of business (last operating business within the N.C. District) 10:00 p.m., whichever is later, except for security lighting as outlined in Section F. 5. Light Levels a. Minimum fc at ground level .5 b. Maximum fc at ground level 5 c. Recommended Uniformity Ratio 10:1 (maximum illumination to minimum illumination) C. Walkways 1. Fixtures: All walkway lighting fixtures serving parking lots shall be full cut-off fixtures 2. Light Levels: Minimum fc at ground level Maximum fc at ground level Walkways within N.C. District 0.5 5.0 Walkways within Open Space District 0.0 2.0 D. Signs, Flags, Works of Art and Landscape Lighting 1. Signs, government flags and works of art should not be lighted so as to create glare or unduly illuminate the surrounding area. 2. Signs may be illuminated only during hours that the business being advertised -es open and customers are being serviced, or until 10:00 p.m., whichever is later. Up -lighting of works of art and flags is permitted, with a limit of two (2) fixtures per flag or art item with a maximum of nine thousand (9,000) lumens per fixture. The fixtures must be shielded such that the light source is not visible outside a fifteen - foot radius. 3. Sufficient technical and design information shall be submitted to the DC, to demonstrate that the following provisions are met: 7 itb • a. The maximum level of illumination on the vertical surface of the sign, measured at the brightest point, ten (10) feet from the surface of the sign, shall not exceed five (5.0) fc. b. To the extent practicable, fixtures used to illuminate signs shall be top - mounted and directed downward (i.e., below the horizontal), and the Tight source shall not be directly visible from adjacent properties or CR 100. Monument signs may be up -light but care shall be taken to avoid excessive light spillage outside of the boundaries of the sign panel. 4. Internally illuminated signs: Illumination on the surface of the sign, measured at the brightest point, ten (10) feet from the surface of the sign, shall not exceed five (5.0) fc or equivalent. For boxed, internally lit signs, backgrounds with dark colors and light-colored lettering are encouraged. 5. Landscape Lighting. Plant material and landscape walls may be highlighted with low intensity lighting when excessive light spillage beyond the mass of the targeted plant or object is minimized, the plant is generally not illuminated higher than 10 feet above ground level and the Tight source is concealed from direct view. Final acceptability of lighting levels used to illuminate landscape features will be determined by the DC following installation. 6. Landscape Lighting shall be extinguished within one (1) hour of the close of business or 10:00 p.m., whichever is later. Property owners are encouraged to extinguish lights as soon as possible after their business closes. 7. Outdoor Dining: Lighting of outdoor dining areas shall be achieved with task oriented lighting with full cut-off fixtures mounted not higher than 8 feet above grade. Lighting levels shall not be greater than 14 fc measured 3 feet above the finished grade of the outdoor dining surface. E. Building Facade Lighting 1. Building facades may be illuminated if the illumination is part of and adds to the overall design of the building, adds to the visual quality commercial village and does not produce dangerous or annoying glare or illumination of nearby .streets or properties. 2. The maximum level of illumination, reflected from the surface of a building at a distance of ten (10) feet perpendicular to the illuminated surface shall not exceed one and one-half (1.5) foot-candles. 3. Lighting fixtures shall be carefully located, aimed and shielded so that light is directed only onto the building facade. Lighting fixtures shall not be directed towards streets or roads, other properties or the sky. 4. Building Facade Lighting shall be extinguished within one (1) hour of the close Df business or 10:00 p.m., whichever is later. Property owners are encouraged to extinguish lights as soon as possible after their business closes. 5. Interior Light Spillage: Light spillage from doorways, porch canopies and windows, shall not exceed ten (10) foot-candles. 8 • • F. Security Lighting 1 _ All security lighting fixtures shall be fully shielded and aimed so that illumination is directed only to the designated area. In no case shall lighting be directed above a horizontal plane through the top of the lighting fixture, and the fixture shall include shields that prevent the light source from being visible from adjacent properties and roadways to the fullest extent practical. 2. Security lighting may illuminate ingresses and egresses of buildings up to a level eight (8) feet above grade or eight (8) feet above the bottoms of doorways, windows or entries, whichever is greater. 3. Security lighting for entrances, stairways and service areas shall not exceed five (5) fc at the designated area to be illuminated. 4. Parking lot lighting may be incorporated into a security lighting plan for after-hours security lighting if light levels do not exceed three (3) fc. 5. Examples of acceptable security lighting techniques: a. Recessed lights under a canopy. b. Full cut-off fixtures on parking lot poles. c. Fully shielded wall packs or other fixtures. d. Floodlights which are down -directed, fully shielded, have a maximum height limit of ten (10) feet and are controlled by motion detectors. G. Prohibited Lighting 1. Unshielded Tight sources. 2. Lights which flash, move, revolve, blink, flicker, vary in intensity, change color or use intermittent electrical pulsation are prohibited. 3. Mercury vapor and low-pressure sodium lighting is prohibited. 4. Upward directed lighting that allows spillage into the sky. 9 • ac. PA Arch tectura Grou Co•yri•ht Dou•las R. Porterfield Architect P.C. 200 0 0 • • y%20Documents\LDP-DOCS\98\9815.3\Application%2005\view2color l 00.j pg • 4.08.05 (7) (d) PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET (d) A list of the owners of properties located within two hundred (200) feet of the boundaries of the PUD Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal Rocky Enterprises, Inc. 8501 Candelaria NE, Suite Fl Albuquerque, NM 87112 239131217001 Lot B1, AEE Sherlon Investments Corp. c/o Krabacher & Sanders PC 201 N. Mill Street, Suite 201 Aspen, CO 81611 239131217002 Lot B2, AEE Suzan M. Halevy 46 Equestrian Way Carbondale, CO 81623 239131217003 Lot B3, AEE Rocky Enterprises, Inc. 8501 Candelaria NE, Suite Fl Albuquerque, NM 87112 239131217004 Lot B4, AEE Rocky Enterprises, Inc. 8501 Candelaria NE, Suite Fl Albuquerque, NM 87112 239131217005 Lot B5, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217006 Lot B6, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217007 Lot B7, AEE Thomas and Suzanne Young 2202 Bennett Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239131217008 Lot B8, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217009 Lot B9, AEE Lorrie Wright 601 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 239131217010 Lot B10, AEE 28 • • Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal Lorrie Wright 601 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 239131217011 Lot B11, AEE William and Laurie Delano 554 Sugarfoot Street Castle Rock, CO 80104 239131217012 Lot Cl, AEE The Investment Group, PC c/o Krabacher & Sanders PC 201 N. Mill Street, Suite 201 Aspen, CO 81611 239131217013 Lot C2, AEE Donald and Karen Maloney P. O. Box 1309 Whitney, TX 76692 239131217014 Lot C3, AEE Kenneth D. Noel 105 Montry Heights Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501 239131217015 Lot C4, AEE , Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217016 Lot C5, AEE Rhonda Black 0076 Corral Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 239131217017 Lot C6, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217018 Lot C7, AEE Valdonna Greenlaw John D. Watson 4500 West Hinsdale Littleton, CO 80128 239131217019 Lot C8, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217020 Lot C9, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217021 Lot C10, AEE 29 • • Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal California Bank and Trust 1900 Main Street, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 239131217022 Lot C11, AEE Lot C12 AEQ, LLC c/o Aspen Equestrian Estates 3275 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131217023 Lot C12, AEE _ Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217024 Lot C13, AEE J Dean A. Bramlet 5920 Seabird Drive South Gulfport, FL 33707 239131217025 Lot C14, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217026 Lot C15, AEE Gurmeet Singh David Delano 2700 Cherry Creek South Drive Apartment 314 Denver, CO 80209 239131217027 Lot C16, AEE Betty and Dorothy Mae Gerstley 42.54% 0260 Equestrian Way Carbondale, CO 81623 239131217028 Lot E 1, AEE Capital Construction LLC 0241 County Road 167 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239131217029 Lot E2, AEE Dean A. Bramlet 5920 Seabird Drive South Gulfport, FL 33707 239131217030 Lot E3, AEE Dean A. Bramlet 5920 Seabird Drive South Gulfport, FL 33707 239131217031 Lot E4, AEE 30 • Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal Greg Agee Construction, Inc. P. O. Box 8893 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 239131217032 Lot E5, AEE Greg Agee Construction, Inc. P. O. Box 8893 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 239131217033 Lot E6, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217034 Lot E7, AEE _ Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217035 Lot E8, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217036 Lot E9, AEE _ Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217037 Lot E 10, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217038 Lot Ell, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217039 Lot E12, AEE . Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217040 Lot E13, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217041 Lot E14, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217042 Lot EIS, AEE 31 • Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217043 Lot E16, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217044 Lot E17, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217045 Lot E18, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217046 Lot E19, AEE Local Service Corp. 4500 W. Hindale Avenue Littleton, CO 80128 239131217047 Lot E20, AEE Aspen Equestrian Estates 3275 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131217048 Equestrian Lot, AEE Aspen Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association c/o Aspen Equestrian Estates P. O. Box 4788 Aspen, CO 81612 239131217049 Open Space Clubhouse, AEE Aspen Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association c/o Aspen Equestrian Estates P. O. Box 4788 Aspen, CO 81612 239131217050 Open Space & Commons Area, AEE Catherine Store Ventures, LLC 15783 Highway 82 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131200009 Catherine Store Terry and Pamela Thompson 0233 Vaquero Road Carbondale, CO 81623 239131218001 Lot 1, St. Finnbar 32 • • Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal Judith L. Niro 1005 North Arlington Heights Way Arlington Heights, IL 60004 239131218002 Lot 2, St. Finnbar - Roaring Fork Farms, LLC c/o Jim Mindling 32 Buttonball Lane Weston, CT 06883 239131218003 Lot 3, St. Finnbar Roaring Fork Farms, LLC c/o Jim Mindling 32 Buttonball Lane Weston, CT 06883 239131218005 Lot 5, St. Finnbar _ Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Association 14913 Highway 82 Carbondale, CO 81623 239336100005 239336100001 Phase III Common Area, Ranch @ RF Residential Condos, Common Area, Golf Course, Ranch @ RF Carol J. Pucak 0295 Escalante El Jebel, CO 81623 239131216011 Lot 11, Ranch @ RF Marta J. Sundberg 218 East Valley Road, Suite 104-282 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131216012 Lot 12, Ranch @ RF Vicki and Jerry Garwood 481 Stagecoach Lane Carbondale, CO 81623 239131216013 Lot 13, Ranch @ RF Patricia L. Stites 14042 E. Maplewood Place Centennial, CO 80111 239131216014 Lot 14, Ranch @ RF John and Susan Tindall P. O. Box 2014 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239131216015 Lot 15, Ranch @ RF Richard and Mary Stuckey 2022 East 4th Avenue Denver, CO 80206 239131216016 Lot 16, Ranch @ RF 33 • • Name Assessor Parcel Number Legal Blue Creek Ranch Homeowners Association 3220 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131120050 Utilities & Parking, Blue Creek Ranch _ State of Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 E. Arkansas Avenue Denver, CO 80222 239131120049 Utilities & Parking, Blue Creek Ranch Blue Creek Ranch Homeowners Association 3220 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131120051 Common Open Space, Blue Creek Ranch _ Blue Creek Ranch Homeowners Association 3220 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131120052 Common Open Space, Blue Creek Ranch - James and Mary Stokes 3220 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131120001 Lot 1, Blue Creek Ranch JRP, LLC 485 County Road 112 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131219001 Lot 1, T.O. Ranch JRP, LLC 485 County Road 112 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131219002 Lot 2, T.O. Ranch Robinson Urban Farm, LLC 912 County Road 113 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131200021 15524 Highway 82 Nancy and Joseph Maison 15452 Highway 82 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131200020 15452 Highway 82 Robinson Urban Farm, LLC 912 County Road 113 Carbondale, CO 81623 239131200007 Highway 82 - 34 25 30 36 Adjoining 2391 es • GRA N O E „ v.v n�NG Fv• +� ESTERA RAIL ROAD Aspen Equestrian Estates HOA Open Space Adjoining Property Owners within 200 feet R. 0- W. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS EXHIBIT M M 4.08.05 (7) (e)(i & ii) WATER SUPPLY (e) A statement by a licensed engineer, with supporting calculations and documentation, which shall provide evidence of the following: (A. 97-109) (i) The proposed water source legally & physically adequate to service the PUD; (ii) The proposed method of sewage treatment legally and physically adequate to service the PUD. If the PUD application proposes to utilize existing, central facilities, the application shall contain a letter from the district or provider that adequate excess capacity currently exists and will be devoted to accommodating the development, or that the capacity will be expanded to adequately accommodate the development; (A. 97-109) A Utility Services Report, dated September 12, 2005, prepared by Zancanella & Associates. A Utility Systems Schematic Plan, dated September 12, 2005. As discussed in Section 4.07.03(8), community water service to the neighborhood commercial village will be provided either by connection to the facilities of the Water Association or by construction of a new storage tank, pump house and distribution lines which would be owned and maintained by the commercial property owners association. The decision of which alternative will be used to provide community water service to the neighborhood commercial village will be made as part of the subdivision preliminary plan process. AEE, LLC has submitted an application to obtain a contract with the Basalt Water Conservancy District ("BWCD") to augment the consumptive uses associated with the neighborhood commercial village and the four additional residential lots. Water under the BWCD contract will be diverted through the Pinto Well — a well located on the Equestrian Lot and owned by AEE, LLC. In the event that the neighborhood commercial villagers served by the Water Association, the BWCD contract will be assigned to the Water Association for use in the Association's facilities and the Pinto Well will be dedicated to the Water Association and connected to the Water Association's system as a back-up well. WATER AND SEWER REPORT — Zancanella & Associates, September 12, 2005 SCHEMATIC WATER & SEWER PLAN — AEE/BC SYSTEM SCENARIO SCHEMATIC WARER & SEWER PLAN — COMMERCIAL VILLAGE POA SCENARIO WELL PERMITS BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT CONTRACT CARBONDALE & RURAL FIRE DISTRICT LETTER RANCH AT ROARING FORK CAN & WILL SERVE LETTER RANCH AT ROARING FORK TAP PURCHASE RECEIPT 36 P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, SOO 81602 • / Z4NC4NELL4 4141) 4530041E5, INC. • ENGINEERING CONSULT4NTS September 12, 2005 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Preshana Farm PUD, Equestrian Lot Amendment — Water and Sewer Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax This report presents the findings of the water supply investigations performed by Zancaneila and Associates, Inc. for the proposed neighborhood commercial village addition to the Equestrian Lot contained within the Preshana Farm PUD. Information contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses, legal water supply, well pump test, and water quality analyses. • This report will discuss two water supply alternatives. Scenario one, which will be referred to as the "AEE/BC" scenario, involves the connection of the proposed neighborhood commercial village to the existing Aspen Equestrian / Blue Creek water system (AEE/BC system). The AEE/BC system is currently in operation, serving the residential developments at the Aspen Equestrian Estates and the Blue Creek subdivisions. It is a community water system regulated by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), under PWSID # C00123152. The domestic water system consists of a 200,000 gallon storage tank, two wells, chlorination system, fire -flow pumps, and distribution system. A schematic of this scenario is represented in Figure 1. The second scenario, to be referred to as the "Commercial Village POA (Property Owners Association) scenario", involves the construction of domestic and raw water sy$t'ems, separate from the AEE/BC system. The Commercial Village POA system would consist of the existing Pinto Well, a proposed backup well, a treatment building, and a 30,000 gallon domestic storage tank. The Commercial Village POA system would utilize raw water irrigation and a 2500 gpm raw water (from the pond) pump station for fire flow requirements. Figure 2 shows a schematic drawing of the Commercial Village POA scenario. Prior to the filing of the subdivision preliminary plan for the re -platting of the Equestrian Lot, one of these options will be selected and detailed engineering designs will be provided at that time in compliance with Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Water Requirements The new neighborhood commercial village will consist of 20,000 square feet of commercial space. Additionally, four single family residential lots will be added to an existing residential district in the Preshana Farm PUD. For our water requirement estimate, we have assumed that each EQR will represent 3.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day. Water will be diverted to irrigate up to 2500 square feet of lawn or other equivalent outside uses for each residence. Water requirements for each residence have been increased to 1.8 EQR per residence, based on actual usage measurements for the PUD. Uses at the existing Equestrian Lot are accommodated by the existing AEE/BC system. Legal Supply Application has been made to revise the Basalt Water Conservancy District contract to cover the additional out -of -priority water use anticipated by the construction of the commercial center. The contract is attached. Table 1 attached to the BWCD contract application shows the water demand and consumptive use for the neighborhood commercial village. The proposed plan will serve and estimated 30.15 EQRs. It will divert an average 19.88 AF annually, and consumptively use 7.79 AF. The peak month of June would require a continuous average diversion of 15.08 gpm. Under the Commercial Village POA scenario, the neighborhood commercial village would be served by the existing Pinto Well and a proposed well, the Bay Well. The Pinto Well was completed on October 10, 1999 by Shelton Drilling Corporation at a total depth of 47 feet. The well was drilled as a monitoring hole under permit number MH -36529B. It was later converted to a fee well under permit number 53232-F. A call to the State Engineer's Office, Groundwater Information Desk on July 1, 2005 confirmed that a well construction report for the Pinto Well was filed in 1999 and a pump installation report was filed in 2000. The well permit is in good standing with the State Engineer's Office and is attached. With the AEE/BC option, the Pinto well will be connected to the AEE/BC system as a back-up well. Sewer Treatment Wastewater from the proposed neighborhood commercial village and the additional single family Tots will be treated through a contract with the Ranch at Roaring Fork wastewater treatment facility. Prepaid taps for this project have been purchased (see Figure 3). A "Can and Will Serve" letter from the Ranch at Roaring Fork is attached. Physical Supply The Pinto Well is located in the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 31, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6th P.M. The location of the well can be plotted 1603 feet from the north section line and 2220 feet from the west section line. The approximate location of the well and the neighborhood commercial village boundary are shown on the attached general location map, Figure 3. The well was developed in the Roaring Fork River alluvium. A copy of the well construction report and a graphical representation of the well (Figure 4) are attached. A 25 hour pump test of the Pinto Well was conducted on May 17, 2005 by Samuelson Pump Company. The pump test was performed at an initial rate of 50 gallons per minute (gpm). The rate was increased to 75 gpm at 280 minutes into the test period. The drawdown and time data collected during the test are presented in Table 2. We have plotted the results of the test in a water level vs. time curve as shown on the attached r Figure 5. The maximum drawdown during the 25 hour test was 2.13 feet. The water level stabilized and even began to recover slightly toward the end of the test. Recovery data were collected for a period of one hour after pumping stopped, although the water level recovered to a point above the measured static water level within one minute after the pump was stopped. A plot of the recovery data shown as residual drawdown is attached as Figure 6. The test indicates that the well will be able to operate for extended periods at a rate of approximately 75 gpm. This amount, with water storage to handle peak demands, should be adequate to serve the neighborhood commercial village demands. If the AEE Commercial Center scenario is adopted, a second well is planned, to provide mechanical redundancy to the system. Water Quality Water quality samples were collected during the pump test and sent to Evergreen Analytical Laboratories in Wheat Ridge for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs), volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), inorganic chemicals (IOCs), nitrate/nitrite, radiological properties, coliform bacteria and some of the physical properties of the water. Results of the lab tests, on CDPHE forms, are attached. The coliform bacteria test indicates that coliform bacteria were absent from the sample. Results from all the other lab testing showed that the samples were below the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) as established by the CDPHE and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. We believe that either of the two water supply options described in this report can provide a reliable physical and legal water supply for the proposed neighborhood commercial village. A review by the Carbondale Fire Protection District concurring that 2500 gpm for two hours would be adequate for this development is attached. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. QtArKIJ A 31..4 awIA Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. r t‘ Bradley C. Peek, Geologis Attachments cc: Ron Liston Z:\97000's\97420 Aspen Equestrian Estates\97420.1 AEE Commercial Center\ZA Bean-WaterSupplyRL2.doc 3 M Table 1 Commercial Village Water Demand and Consumptive Use Summary Water Demands - Commercial No. of Residential EQR's No. of Commercial EQR's Total Number ofEQR's No. of persons/residence No. gallons/ person /day Percent Consumed Lawn Area's Application Efficiency Pond Area Annual Lawn Gnus Irrigation Requirement Potabk Water - Residential Lawn Area (total) Patabk Water - Commercial Lawn Area (total) Potable Water - Total Lawn Area (total) 12.2 EQRS 18.0 EQRS 30.15 EQRo 3.5 cap /Egret 100.0 gym' 5% 2,500 sq -J1/ 80% 1.0 mer (.99p 0.7 acres 1.03 1.7 acres () (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) CO (8) (9) (10) ( ) (12) ( u) 14) January February March April May June July August September October November December Diversion Requirements Commercial In -House Outside (a00 (a*JO Residential Pond Total In -House Outside Evaporation ( P) (ac/0 (ac -ft) (acre-feet) Pumping (Fpm) Commercial In -House Outside Consumptive Use Residential Pond In -House Outside Evaporation (mf) (ao-JO (4e -ft) (ac -J1) (a00 Total Plus 5% (acrc-jm) (acre- t) 0.60 0.54 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.49 0.62 0.58 0.38 0.32 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.37 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.39 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.33 0.42 0.40 0.26 0.22 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.13 0.21 0.34 0.45 0.54 0.56 0.51 0.38 0.26 0.15 0.11 1.12 1.04 1.21 1.44 2.27 2.55 2.55 2.15 1.89 1.44 1.12 1.12 8.15 8.39 8.83 10.89 16.57 19.22 18.59 15.67 14.22 (0.50 8.46 8.15 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.39 0.49 0.47 0.30 0.26 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.26 0.33 0.32 0.21 0.17 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.13 0.21 0.34 0.45 0.54 0.56 0.51 0.38 0.26 0.15 0.11 0.16 0.18 0.26 0.49 1.15 1.42 1.40 1.07 0.85 0.45 0.20 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.27 0.52 1.21 1.49 1.47 1.12 0.90 0.47 0.21 0.17 Total 7.04 2.57 4.78 1.75 3.75 19.88 0.35 2.05 0.24 1.40 3.75 7.79 8.18 r (1) Equals No. ofCommaeial EQRS times No. of Person / EQR times No. Gallons/Person/Day times Number of Days in Month (2) Equals Potable Water • Commercial [awn Area tines Monthly CO2 divided by Application Efficiency. (3) Equals No. of Residential EQRS tum No. of Person / 800 times No. Cellons/Persa✓Day tines Number of Days in Month (4) Equals Potable Water - Residential fawn Area toms Monthly CO2 divided by Application Efficiency. (5) Equals Pond Evaporation Rate times Pond Area (6) Equals the sum ofColmms (1 Riau 5 ). (7) Equals Column (7) titin 325851 divided by No. of Minutes in Month. 110 (8) Equals Column (1) toms Percent Canamd. (9) Equals Column (2) tom Irrigating. Efficiency. (10) Equals Colurmm (3) toms Percent Consumed. (1 I) Equals Column (4) tmles Nigaion Efficiency. (12) Equals Column (5). (13) Equals the sum ofColmres (8 thru 12 ). (14) Equals the Column (13) tum (1 plus presented percentage) Type of Use Single Family Units Equestrian Facilities Single Family Unit Caretaker Unit Barns (livestock. riding arena) Commercial Restaurant (7.000r0) Seats Commercial / Retail (8,000rq.J2) Toilets Sinks Medical Center/ Retail (S,000sq.J).1 Toilets Sinks Showers Wash Machines Units EQR Total per EQR Unit (0QR) 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.2 2.0 1.0 2.0 190 0.065 12.35 4.0 0.50 2.0 6.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.20 0.50 0.20 0.30 0.30 1.2 1.00 0.80 0.30 0.30 Total n/a n/a 30.15 EQRS brad on Mid•Valley District EQR Policy. Zanund4 Arasciarr UK, 9/1:/2005 Z./970000197420 Aspen Equestrian Estates/97420.1 AEE Commercial CentOTWata Usage basalt contract Domestic CIR jcer) Days in Month Lake Evaporation ob.) January 0.00 31 0.11 February 0.00 28 0.13 March 0.00 31 0.2 ) April 0.06 30 0.34 May 0.38 31 0.45 June 0.48 30 0.54 July 0.45 31 0.56 August 0.29 31 0.51 September 0.25 30 0.38 October 0.08 31 0.26 November 0.00 30 0.15 December 0.00 31 0.11 Total 1.99 365 3.75 110 (8) Equals Column (1) toms Percent Canamd. (9) Equals Column (2) tom Irrigating. Efficiency. (10) Equals Colurmm (3) toms Percent Consumed. (1 I) Equals Column (4) tmles Nigaion Efficiency. (12) Equals Column (5). (13) Equals the sum ofColmres (8 thru 12 ). (14) Equals the Column (13) tum (1 plus presented percentage) Type of Use Single Family Units Equestrian Facilities Single Family Unit Caretaker Unit Barns (livestock. riding arena) Commercial Restaurant (7.000r0) Seats Commercial / Retail (8,000rq.J2) Toilets Sinks Medical Center/ Retail (S,000sq.J).1 Toilets Sinks Showers Wash Machines Units EQR Total per EQR Unit (0QR) 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.2 2.0 1.0 2.0 190 0.065 12.35 4.0 0.50 2.0 6.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.20 0.50 0.20 0.30 0.30 1.2 1.00 0.80 0.30 0.30 Total n/a n/a 30.15 EQRS brad on Mid•Valley District EQR Policy. Zanund4 Arasciarr UK, 9/1:/2005 Z./970000197420 Aspen Equestrian Estates/97420.1 AEE Commercial CentOTWata Usage basalt contract 50 0 5 00 1500 Scale In Feet T7S ijE.NTO WELL LOCATION DATE SHEET SCALE = 1000' MAY 19, 2005 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: BCA CHKD BY: TAZ APPD BY: TAZ PLAN NO. acTopo-2005Rev. ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES ZANC4NEL L A ANTI ASSOCIATES, INC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS POST OFFKE BOX 1906 - 1006 COOPER AVOWS QD111000 SPRMOS, COLORADO 81e02 (970) 918-5700 FIGURE N0. PROJECT: 97420 ALLUVIAL BOULDERS AND GRAVEL ALLUVIAL SAND AND GRAVEL SHALE TOTAL DEPTH 47' 10- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 0' TO 47' HOLE DIAMETER = 6.5' 5' - 15' CEMENT GROUT STATIC WATER LEVEL = 11,63' ON MAY 17, 2005 -1' TO 36' 5.5' PLAIN STEEL CASING 0.188' WALL THICKNESS 36' TO 41' 5.5' STEEL PERF CASING 41' TO 47' 5.5' PLAIN STEEL CASING 0.188' WALL THICKNESS PINTO WELL DETAIL DATE 0 SCALE MAY 19. 2005 DRAWN BY: CH KD BY: APPD BY: BCP BCP TAZ SHEET: 1 OF 1 DRAWING: Pin toiletal.dwg ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES ZANCANELLA ANP ASSOCIATES, INC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS POST am= BOX 1906 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE GDD/11OOD SPRMGS. COLORADO 54902 (970) 946-5700 FIGURE NO. PROJECT: 17420 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OH ICE ()FINE - E STATE. ENGINEER WELL P.ERMIT NUMBER MH -36529-B Owner Naine(s): Pcrsha.na Farms Mailing Address: % Zaneanella & Assoc. PO Box 1908 City, State. Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Pbone It : (970) 945-5700 F(....)rriCY 1.1sr. ONLY APPROVAL 11 C wS31-91-113 W1=T.1. i,()CATION AS DR11.I.f U SF. 1/4 NW I/4 Sec: 31 Twp: 7 S King: 87 W DISTANCES FROM SF.C. LINES 11. from See. line and ft_ from Sec. line OR Northing: Fasting: SUBUIVTSION: LOT: BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION GROUND SURFACE i;1.FVATiON 11. DRILLING ME'1TTOD Cabletool DAJ'F COMPLETED: 10/10/1999 TOTAL DEPTH: 47 DEPTTT COMPI.F.TION: 47 5. GF.0I.0GIC (..OG Doth Typo of Material (Size, C:otor, and Type) 000-030 Boulders, Rocks, Gravels 030-043 Sand, Cravelc 043-047 Shale ti. HOLL DIAMI TLKlin) 6.5 Rom (It) 0 47 7. PLAIN CASING O1) (in) 5.5 5.5 Kind Steel Steel TO (11) 17 Wall Size) 0.188 0.138 From (ft) 41 PERF. CASING : Screen Slot .Size Water Located: 10 - 43 Remarks 5.5 8. Filter Pack Material . Size : Interval : 36 to (Q) 3(i /17 41 9. Packer Placement Typo : Depth : 10. C1201T1'1NG RF.CORL) Malttial Amount Delsiry InlG1•al cement 3 sks 16 gal -15 Plammcn t J poured 11. DISINI'LCT1ON : Typo : iTTH Amt. Used : UZ. 12. WL:I.1. TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data is Submitted On Supplemental TLSTiN(. MI. TiTOD : Bailer Static Level : 10 ft. Pumping Level : Total ft. Test Remarks : Date/1'i(ne Measured 10/10/1999 Production Rate 10 gpm Date/Time Measured 10/10/1999 Test i.cngth : 2 13. I.3.c read thn a +I6mte lt! flet au male I.god know II. contents II . r o(. 304 that (hey (ru�; c to my ,xnvledgc. (P..fs,a..1to S4YIun, 21-1 -1-4 (11)(:,) CRS. the mn►n.� „f false sr,. m,,,enbt anu/dutes perlory n file !Ceded ,ley,u: and is A,m,<I. thi. at a CIa .. 1 niisdCalC.lni)r ) C:ONTRAC OR : Shelton Drilling Corp. Phone : (970)927-4182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 8162 I Lie. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) ayne Shelton / President Signature Date 9/14/1999 tip • TABLE 2 Pump Test Data Well ID: Pinto Well Job No.: 17420 Q = 75 gpm Client: Aspen Equestrian Estates r = ft Test By: Samuelson Pump Co. S.W.L. = 11.63 ft Analysis By: BCP b = ft M.P. = Top of Casing Time/Date on: 5/17/05 10:10 AM Time/Date off: 5/18/05 11:15 AM Test Length: 25:05:00 total time TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement Drawdown Q (gpm) t' (minutes) t/t' (feet) (inches) (feet) 5/17/05 10:10 AM 0 11 7.50 SWL 50 5/17/05 10:11 AM 1 12 7.75 1.02 50 5/17/05 10:12 AM 2 12 10.50 1.25 50 5/17/05 10:13 AM 3 12 11.00 1.29 50 5/17/05 10:14 AM 4 12 11.00 1.29 50 5/17/05 10:15 AM 5 12 11.00 1.29 50 5/17/05 10:16 AM 6 12 11.00 1.29 50 5/17/05 10:18 AM 8 12 10.50 1.25 50 5/17/05 10:20 AM 10 12 10.50 1.25 50 5/17/05 10:22 AM 12 12 10.50 1.25 50 5/17/05 10:25 AM 15 12 10.50 1.25 50 5/17/05 10:30 AM 20 12 10.50 1.25 50 5/17/05 10:40 AM 30 12 10.75 1.27 50 5/17/05 10:50 AM 40 12 11.00 1.29 50 5/17/05 11:00 AM 50 12 11.00 1.29 50 5/17/05 11:10 AM 60 12 11.25 1.31 50 5/17/05 11:40 AM 90 12 11.50 1.33 50 5/17/05 12:10 PM 120 12 11.50 1.33 50 5/17/05 2:10 PM 240 12 11.75 1.35 50 5/17/05 2:50 PM 280 12 11.25 1.31 50 5/17/05 2:51 PM 281 13 6.50 1.92 75 5/17/05 2:52 PM 282 13 6.50 1.92 75 5/17/05 2:53 PM 283 13 6.75 1.94 75 5/17/05 2:54 PM 284 13 6.25 1.90 75 5/17/05 2:55 PM 285 13 6.00 1.88 75 5/17/05 2:56 PM 286 13 7.00 1.96 75 5/17/05 3:00 PM 290 13 7.50 2.00 75 5/17/05 3:02 PM 292 13 7.50 2.00 75 5/17/05 3:05 PM 295 13 8.50 2.08 75 5/17/05 3:10 PM 300 13 8.50 2.08 75 5/17/05 3:20 PM 310 13 9.00 2.13 75 5/17/05 3:30 PM 320 13 8.75 2.10 75 5/17/05 3:40 PM 330 13 8.75 2.10 75 5/17/05 3:50 PM 340 13 9.00 2.13 75 5/17/05 4:20 PM 370 13 9.00 2.13 75 5/17/05 4:50 PM 400 13 9.00 2.13 75 5/17/05 9:45 PM 695 13 8.50 2.08 75 5/18/05 7:00 AM 1250 13 6.75 1.94 75 5/18/05 11:15 AM 1505 13 5.75 1.85 75 5/18/05 11:16 AM 1506 11 5.75 -0.15 Stopped Pumping 1 1506 5/18/05 11:17 AM 1507 11 5.75 -0.15 0 2 754 5/18/05 11:18 AM 1508 11 5.75 -0.15 0 3 503 5/18/05 11:19 AM 1509 11 5.50 -0.17 0 4 377 5/18/05 11:20 AM 1510 11 5.50 -0.17 0 5 302 5/18/05 11:21 AM 1511 11 5.25 -0.19 0 6 252 5/18/05 11:23 AM 1513 11 5.50 -0.17 0 8 189 5/18/05 11:25 AM 1515 11 5.25 -0.19 0 10 152 5/18/05 11:27 AM 1517 11 5.25 -0.19 0 12 126 5/18/05 11:30 AM 1520 11 5.00 -0.21 0 15 101 5/18/05 11:35 AM 1525 11 4.75 -0.23 0 20 76 5/18/05 11:45 AM 1535 11 4.50 -0.25 0 30 51 5/18/05 11:55 AM 1545 11 4.50 -0.25 0 40 39 5/18/05 12:05 PM 1555 11 4.25 -0.27 0 50 31 5/18/05 12:15 PM 1565 11 4.25 -0.27 0 60 26 8/12/2005 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Pinto Well Pump Test.xls 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O a) LE a O O N d c0 CO - N d CO 00 O N ct CO CO O N co CO O N et CO NNNNN Cr) M CO M M ":t 't st d' ( ) 13A37 .ialeM Pinto Well Pump Test xis Zancanella & Associates, Inc. HStatic Water Level = 11.63 ft. — — --- -- --- I 1 I I - _ a O N 11 a g - I Io I 1 I I I 0 W 2 0 CO N I I I I I I I I I 1 I (e CO -- 155 a 7 a N d c0 CO - N d CO 00 O N ct CO CO O N co CO O N et CO NNNNN Cr) M CO M M ":t 't st d' ( ) 13A37 .ialeM Pinto Well Pump Test xis Zancanella & Associates, Inc. 0 0 0 0 - 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 c) (lanai °i;e;S wo.0 wad) uMopMeJa 0 0 0 0 1) Pinto Well Pump Test.xls Zancanella & Associates, Inc. r7 • o--3y1Z-o/A/ VSAMPLER. PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT Of COMPOSITE SET YES ❑ or NO EidESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 5/17/05 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates SYSTEM ADDRESS: 3275 County Road 100 City: Carbondale State: CO Zip: 81623 CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury PHONE: 970 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wallace Canterbury TIME COLLECTED: 3:15 pm WATER TYPE: RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) >Eir CHLORINATED ®OTHER TREATMENT ❑ SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): - Address/Area SAMPLE POINT(S): Pinto Well I County Road 100 I Well Head For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: C6 ?IEQL) CLIENT NAME or ID#• --\11(c-0 1030RATORY NAME: Industrial Lai2S LAB PHONE #• Z 3'-2.e%Gb) DATE/TIME RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: (951IS 051e1o5 c;' DATE/TIME ANALYZED: COMMENTS: (# 110omI) (# 1100mI) PARAMETER RESULT MCL Coliform, Total (.YL� Rev IIIIRESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. WQCO-DW-B2. 4300 Cherry Crook Drive South. Denver, CO 80222-1530 p1•1111PIK . . SM (#/ 100mI) METHOD LAB MDL Y �rlola-�3P� --92228' C.CC)-71Z72J5/a% Title Date Laboratory: Call drinking water section of CDPHE immediately with any results other than < 1 or absent. (303) 692-3547 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Corrosivity analyses YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 5/17/05 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates. c/o Zancanella & Assoc. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave Glenwood Springs SQ 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury PHONE: (970) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wallace Canterbury TIME COLLECTED: 3:15 pm WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): Pinto Wel( County Road 100 Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 05-3412-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 5/18/05 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: PINTO WELL LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 5/18/05-6/1/05 NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. *** = If Langelier Index is a negative number, water is corrosive. If Langelier Index is zero, water is balanced. If Langelier Index is a positive number, water is scale forming. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. N/A = Not applicable. 4110 Technical Director �, Reviewed and approved by Title Dat MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) LANGELIER INDEX +0.20 *** SM 2330B N/A CALCIUM CARBONATE 300 N/A 200.8 0.34 7PARAMETER DISSOLVED SOLIDS 514 N/A SM 2540C 10.0 pH 7.32 N/A 150.1 N/A TOTAL ALKALINITY 194 N/A SM 2320B 5.0 TEMPERATURE 20 °C N/A NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. *** = If Langelier Index is a negative number, water is corrosive. If Langelier Index is zero, water is balanced. If Langelier Index is a positive number, water is scale forming. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. N/A = Not applicable. 4110 Technical Director �, Reviewed and approved by Title Dat MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 ".tJ. C:ulurakk 1)cpartnznt of Ptah& Health and 1•m iton ntcnt Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YES NO x Is this a check or confirmation sample? YESE NOD PWSID: , - ; ., COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 5/17/2005 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates, c/o Zancanella & Assoc. SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box City State Zip CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury PHONE: (970) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wallace Canterbury TIME COLLECTED: 3:15 pm ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE XE FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated Other Treatment D Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) OTHER DESCRIPTION: County Road 100 STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP Well Head SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Pinto Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YESE NOa CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LLABORATORY SAMPLE #: 05-3412-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: PINTO WELL ABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 5/18/05 DATE ANALYZED: 5/19/2005 - 5/25/2005 COMMENTS: PARAMETER RESULT in (mg/L) MCL in (mg/L) STANDARD METHOD LAB MDL in (mg/L) ANTIMONY BDL 0.006 200.8 0.002 ARSENIC BDL 0.05/0.010* 200.8 0.002 BARIUM 0.037 2.0 200.8 0.01 BERYLLIUM BDL 0.004 200.8 0.001 CADMIUM BDL 0.005 200.8 0.0005 CHROMIUM BDL 0.1 200.8 0.006 CYANIDE BDL 0.2 SM4500-CN E 0.01 FLUORIDE BDL 4.0 SM4500-F C 0.4 MERCURY BDL 0.002 245.1 0.0001 NICKEL BDL ** 200.8 0.01 SELENIUM 0.0025 0.05 200.8 0.002 SODIUM 6.6 ** 200.8 0.16 THALLIUM BDL 0.002 200.8 0.001 BDL Indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. NT = Not Tested for Compound. mg/L = Milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. H = Holding time has been exceeded.' • = MCL=0.010 mg/L is effective January 23, 2006. •• = NOT an MCL, "Monitoring Requirement Only-. Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. Technical Director Reviewed & Approved by Title date MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 51_-r;, e:s' Pt C,iut-a.ju of 1\14)1.x. lirslth and Imirunmcnt Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YESu NO❑X Is this a check or confirmation sample? YES NOQ PWSID: , COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 5/17/2005 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates, c/o Zancanella & Assoc. SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave Street address/PO Box CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury Glenwood Springs CO 81601 City State Zip PHONE: (970) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECT i ED BY: Wallace Canterbury TIME COLLECTED: 3:15 pm ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE XD FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated Ei Other Treatment D Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) ❑X OTHER DESCRIPTION: County Road 100 STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP Well Head SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Pinto Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YESLj NO X❑ CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LLABORATORY SAMPLE #: 05-3412-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: PINTO WELL ABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 5/18/05 DATE ANALYZED: 5/18/2005 02:55 PM COMMENTS: PARAMETER RESULT in (mg/L) MCL in (mg/L) STANDARD METHOD LAB MDL in (mg/L) NITRATE -N 0.38 10.0 E300 0.056 NITRITE -N BDL 1.0 E300 0.076 NITRATE+NITRITE-N 0.38 10.0 E300 0.076 BDL - indicates that the copund was analyzed for. but was below the Lab MDL. NT - Not Tatted for Compound. mg/L - Milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. H - Holding time has been exceeded. Lab MDL - Laboratory Method Detection Limit. 411111 (4„_X t Technical Director 6/2/c Reviewed & Approved by Title / MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-132, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 l.i,101AJU 1;t721t11xr1t M Health nd F.n trDnmcnr Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YESDor NOE Is this a check or confirmation sample? YES❑ NOD PWSID: _ _ COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates, c/o Zancanella & Assoc. DATE COLLECTED: 5/17/2005 SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave Street address/PO Box CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury Glenwood Springs CO 81601 City State Zip PHONE: (970) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wallace Canterbury TIME COLLECTED: 3:15 pm ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE ❑X FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated El Other Treatment Erl Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) ❑X STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EPWeII Head SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Pinto Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES❑ NO X❑ NOTE: CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 05-3412-01 •ABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 5/18/05 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME or ID #: PINTO WELL LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 5/20/2005 - 5/26/2005 • 1 of 5 LABORATORY NUMBER: 05-3412-01 PWSID -27 GI,'T 4,1 .D .1)}:f SII 1 11 Y� �.'1'� t�1 1?' .�.ai '../ : �.-.LJ - ?V C.C3 UNITS MUST BE REPORTED IN µg/L BOL = Indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. B - The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. NT = Not Tested for Compound. µ g/l. =Micrograms per Liter. MCL M Maximum Contaminant Level. Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. = Indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limit and greater than the Lab MDL. (Above the Lab MDL but below the PQL). 41) 2 of 5 CONTAMINANT CAS# RESULT J -L g/L MCL µ g/L STANDARD METHOD PQL µg/L Lab MDL g/L BLANK RESULT 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 BDL 7 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 71-55-6 BDL 200 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 79-00-5 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 BDL 70 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Benzene 71-43-2 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 BDL 70 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Dichloromethane 75-09-2 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 BDL 700 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Monochlorobenzene 108-90-7 BDL 100 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL o -Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 BDL 600 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL para -Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 BDL 75 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Styrene 100-42-5 BDL 100 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Toluene 108-88-3 BDL 1,000 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Vrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 BDL 100 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 BDL 5 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 BDL 2 E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Xylenes (total) 1330-20-7 BDL 12,000 E524.2 0 5 n 5 PTV BOL = Indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. B - The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. NT = Not Tested for Compound. µ g/l. =Micrograms per Liter. MCL M Maximum Contaminant Level. Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. = Indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limit and greater than the Lab MDL. (Above the Lab MDL but below the PQL). 41) 2 of 5 LABORATORY NUMBER: 05-3412-01. PWSID • UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS - VOCs UNITS MUST BE REPORTED IN µg/L CONTAMINANT 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane CAS# 630-20-6 RESULT µ MCL µa STANDARD METHOD PQLgg/L BDL E524.2 0.5 Lab MDL µ g/L 0.5 BLANK RESULT BDL Bromomethane 74-83-9 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Dibromomethane 74-95-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Bromobenzene 108-86-1 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Chloroethane 75-00-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL p-Chlortoluene 106-43-4 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL o-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 2,2-Dichloropropane 590-20-7 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Chloromethane 74-87-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 95-63-6 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 75-34-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 79-34-5 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 541-73-1 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Fluorotrichloromethane 75-69-4 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Naphthalene 91-20-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL THMs E524.2 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Bromoform Chlorodibromomethane 75-25-2 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL 124-48-1 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL Chloroform 67-66-3 BDL E524.2 0.5 0.5 BDL BDL. = Indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. 8 = The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. NT = Noe Tested for Compound. µ g/L = Micrograms per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. J.. Indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limit and greater than the Lab MDL. �bove the Lab MDL but below the PQL). 3 of 5 .LABORATORY NUMBER: 05-3412-01 PWSID REGULATED PHASE I, II, V ORGANIC CHEMICALS - SOCs UNITS MUST BE REPORTED IN .tg/L CONTAMINANT Dioxin 2,4-D CAS# RESULT MCL tilm STANDARD METHOD PQL g/L 1746-01-6 NT 0.00003 Lab MDL µ g/L BLANK RESULT 2,4,5 -TP 94-75-7 BDL 70 E515.4 0.1 0.1 Alachlor Atrazine 93-72-1 BDL 20 E515.4 0.2 0.2 15972-60-8 BDL 2 E525.2 0.25 0.2 Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Chlordane Dalapon 1912-24-9 BDL 3 E525.2 0.25 0.1 50-32-8 BDL 0.2 E525.2 0.2 0.02 1563-66-2 BDL 40 E531.1 0.5 0.9 57-74-9 BDL 2 E508 0.2 0.2 Dibromochloropropane Dinoseb Diquat 75-99-0 BDL 200 E515.4 1 1.0 NT BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 96-12-8 BDL 0.2 E504.1 0.02 0.02 BDL 85-85-7 BDL 7 E515.4 0.2 0.2 Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 85-00-7 BDL 20 E549.2 0.4 0.4 BDL BDL Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Endothall Endrin 103-23-1 BDL 400 E525.2 0.5 0.6 117-87-7 BDL 6 E525.2 BDL 1 145-73-3 BDL 100 E548.1 0.6 BDL 40 9.0 BDL Ethylene Dibromide lyphosate Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Hexachlorobenzene 72-20-8 BDL 2 E508 0.01 0.01 BDL 106-93-4 1071-83-6 76-44-8 BDL NT BDL 0.05 700 0.4 E504.1 E547 E508 0.01 0.01 BDL NT 0.01 0.04 BDL 1024-57-3 BDL 0.2 E508 0.01 0.02 BDL Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Lindane 118-74-1 BDL 1 E508 0.012 0.1 BDL 77-47-4 BDL 50 E508 0.05 Methoxychlor Oxamyl 58-89-9 BDL 0.2 E508 0.1 BDL 0.01 0.02 BDL 72-43-5 23135-22-0 BDL 40 E508 0.05 0.1 BDL Pentachlorophenol Picloram 87-86-5 BDL 200 E531.1 0.5 2.0 BDL 1918-02-1 BDL 1 E515.4 0.04 0.04 BDL Polychlorinated Biphenyls S imazine BDL 500 E515.4 0.1 0.1 BDL 1336-36-3 BDL 0.5 E508 0.25 0.1 BDL Toxaphene 122-34-9 8001-35-2 BDL 4 E525.2 0.25 0.07 BDL BDL - Indicates that the copund was analyzed for. but was below the Lab MDL. NT ..Not Tested for Compound. B - The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. µ g/L - Micrograms per Liter. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level. 1 - Indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limit and greatte rthan the LabboMDL Method Detection Limit. (Above the Lab MDL but below the PQL). BDL 3 E508 0.5 1.0 BDL • 4 of 5 LABORATORY NUMBER: 05-3412-01 PWSID UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS - SOCs UNITS MUST BE REPORTED IN lag/L r CONTAMINANT CAS# RESULT Ag/L MCL tg/L STANDARD METHOD PQLAg/L Lab MDL µg/L BLANK RESULT Aldicarb sulfoxide 1646-87-3 BDL - E531.1 0.5 0.5 BDL Propachlor 1918-16-7 NT - E525.2 - - NT Metribuzin 21087-64-9 NT - E525.2 - - NT Metolachlor 51218-45-2 NT - E525.2 - - NT Methomyl 16752-77-5 BDL - E531.1 0.5 0.5 BDL 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 16655-82-6 BDL - E531.1 0.5 0.5 BDL Aldicarb sulfone 1646-88-4 BDL - E531.1 0.5 0.5 BDL Dieldrin 60-57-1 BDL - E508 0.01 0.01 BDL Aldrin 309-00-2 BDL - E508 0.01 0.01 BDL Butachlor 23184-66-9 NT - E525.2 - - NT Carbaryl 63-25-2 BDL - E531.1 0.5 0.5 BDL Dicamba 1918-00-9 BDL - E515.4 0.3 0.3 BDL Aldicarb 116-06-3 BDL - E531.1 0.5 0.5 BDI. BDL - Indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL B - The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. NT - Not Tested for Compound. µ g/L -Micrograms per Liter. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level. Lab MDL - Laboratory Method Detection Limit. 1 - Indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitanon limit and greater than the Lab MDL. (Above the Lab MDL but below the PQL). Q 721- -j Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 • Technical Director Title FAX: 303-758-1398 672/0 Date 5 of 5 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment JUN 2 4 2005 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSIS Sampler: Please Complete a Separate Form for Each Sample Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance monitoring requirements? YES ❑or NO ❑ Is this a check or confirmation sample? ❑ YES ❑ NO PWSID: COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates DATE COLLECTED: 05 / 17 / 2005 SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: c/o Zancanella & Assts., 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box CITY CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wallace Canterbury STATE ZIP PHONE: ( 970 ) 945 5700 TIME COLLECTED: 1515 am/pm ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLE ❑ SOURCE WATER (Raw Water) SAMPLE FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated ❑ Other Treatment ❑ Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) ❑ STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Pinto Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES ❑ NO El For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE # E233/05-1 CLIENT NAME or ID# Evergreen Analytical. Inc. LABORATORY NAME: Hazen Research. Inc. ipo,B PHONE # ( 303 ) 279 4501 COMMENTS: DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 05 / 19 / 2005 PARAMETER RESULT UNITS MCC . - STANDARD METHOD LAB MDL REGULATORY MDL DATE ANALYZED Gross Alpha 5.7±3.3 pCi/L 15 pCi/L EPA 900.0 1.7 pCi/L 3 pCi/L 06 / 13 / 2005 Radium 226 0.1±0.2 pCi/L Ra -226+228= 5 pCi/L SM 7500 -Ra B 0.1 pCi/L 1 pCi/L 06 / 07 / 2005 Radium 228 0.5±0.5 pCi/L Ra -226+228= 5 pCi/L EPA Ra -05 0.5 pCi/L 1 pCi/L 06 / 09 / 2005 Uranium .tg/L 30 µg/L ASTM D2907-97 µg/L 1 ;AWL Screening Gross Beta '3.0±2.3 pCi/L Trigger level = 50 pCi/L EPA 900.0 2.0 pCi/L 4 pCi/L 06 / 13 / 2005 Total Solids 497 mg/L m1L* = 500 EPA 160.3 10 mg/L N/A 05 / 23 / 2005 Radon 800±40 pCi/L SM 7500 -Rn B 16 pCi/L 05 / 19 / 2005 econ um on na t Level - Non-entorceable Standard Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by MAIL RESULTS TO: Compliance Alpha Combined Radium -226+228 Uranium Robert Rostad CDPHE, WQCD-CADM 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 Laboratory Mana er Title For State Use ONLY FAX: 303-782-0390 06 / 22 / 2005 Date r is Colorado Dcpattrton 0 ofd(sPublic kraltl: an+imnmcnr Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements Is this a check or confirmation sample? YES❑ NOEI PWSID: _ COUNTY: Garfield YES❑ NOQX DATE COLLECTED: 5/17/2005 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Aspen Equestrian Estates, c/o Zancanella & Assoc. SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave Street address/PO Box CONTACT PERSON: Wallace Canterbury SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wallace Canterbury Glenwood Springs CO 81601 City State Zip PHONE: (970) 945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 3:15 pm ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLE SOURCE WATER SAMPLE X❑ FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated Other Treatment Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment)X❑ OTHER DESCRIPTION: County Road 100 STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: Well Head SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Pinto Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES❑ NO❑X CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line .ABORATORY SAMPLE #: 05-3412-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: PINTO WELL ABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 5/18/05 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 5/25/2005 COMMENTS: PARAMETER RESULT UNITS MCL STANDARD METHOD LAB MDL REGULATORY MDL Gross Alpha NT - -- _ - Screening Gross Beta NT -- - TOTAL SOLIDS NT - -- - - Radium 226 NT - -- - - Radium 228 NT - -- - - Uranium 3.5 ug/L, 30 pg/L4 200.8 1 pg/L 1 pg/L BDL = Indicates that the contaminant was analyzed for. but was below the Lab MDL. Lab MDL - Laboratory Method Detection Limit. pCVL - Picocuria per Liter. µg/L - Micrograms per Liter. mg/L - Milligrams per Liter. MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level. NT - Not Tested for Compound. I - The MCL for beta panicle and photon activity is 4 millirem per year. 2 = The Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level is a recommendation only and not enforceable. 3 - MCL of 5 pCi/L is for COMBINED Radium 226 and 228. 4 - 30 Fg/L (equivalent to 20 pCi/L). N/A = Not applicable. MDL = Method Detection Limit (the laboratory MDL must be equal to or less than the regulatory minimum detection level). Reviewed & Approved by Technical Director Title 6,�r Dat e MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 Q- Irrigation Pump Station • 0 -I�Q4V_ Dry Hydr (from pond) = 5 n ,s CA—4 9- -5 C NFA Basin Ditch Raw Water Supply 4.,Zs Lot 5 aLA' —g - C Po Po d Overflo ' I I I I J I I I`�%'r ef-1Q FH A Eque trian Lot aw ater I,hrig tion to ion Pinto ell cLAD $ soOs Domestic Water System Plant (exi-stiri g) J1 Fire Hydrant zisting Buildings Existing Domestic Water Main w/ Proposed Services along 44qul Way Equestrian Way / • : • RAFTA Park—N—Ride —OLd Hwy_ #82 —a— Future Future Old Hwy #82 Realignment TO BLUE 21. CREEK RANCH 5 0 5 1 0 Scale in Feet REV. NO. DATE REVISION MADE BY CHKD BY APPD BY WATER & SEWER SCHEMATIC AEE/BC SYSTEM SCENARIO SCALE: DATE: SHEET: 1" = 100' 12 AUGUST 2005 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: TPB CHKD BY: BCP APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: WATER PLANS -2 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES PROPOSED P.U.D. AMENDMENT ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A/ZS, INC ENGYNEER/NC CONSUL TANTS GL.FN WOOD SPRPIGOFFICE S,S,XCOLOORAD06 -O 81602 COOPER ) ws�s700 FIGURE NO. PROJECT: 17420 • r Magma 0 0 Irrigation Pump Station Dry Hy.dint- (from pond) Basin Ditch Raw Water Supply HWY 82 Po Overflo Domestic Pump St 00 Gallons storage IR will 11111 f` 11 �Pinto`Well * *0 CD* * *00* FH E q u e aw I r i g to Domestic Water System Plant (ex+tines) trian Lot ater tion Ion xisting Building Fire Hydrant 0 00 Existing Domestic Water Main w/ Proposed 1 Services along Equestrian Way Equestrian Way • 1 RAFTA Park—N—Ride S�Id Hwy #82 Future Old Hwy #82 Realignmej- TO BLUE CREEK RANCH 0 5 150 Scale in Feet REV. N0. DATE REVISION MADE BY CHKD BY APPD BY WATER & SEWER SCHEMATIC COMM. VLG. POA SCENARIO SCALE: 1"=100' DATE: 12 AUGUST 2005 SHE,T:OF 1 DRAWN BY: CHKD BY: TPB BCP APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: WATER PLANS -2 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES PROPOSED P.U.D. AMENDMENT ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A7ES, /NC. ENC/NEER/NC CONSUL TANTS POST O'AC BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AMENIIE ammo sewn COLORADO 81802 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. PROJECT: 17420 ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action, 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402.2. unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the use of an existing well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Roaring Fork River, as an aitemate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit. on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan. approved by the State Engineer, is in effect and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. BWCD contract The use of ground water from this weft is limited to ordinary household purposes inside 47 single family dwellings and three employee dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 3.4 acres of gardens and lawns, the watering of livestock, and commercial uses associated with an equestrian facility. All use of this weal will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a pian for augmentation is in effect The simultaneous maximum pumping rate of this weil and any other well operating under BWCO contract #.343 shall not exceed 100 GPM. The combined annual amount of ground water to be appropriated by this well and any other well operating under BWCO contract #343 shall not exceed 36.4 acre-feet. This well is known as the Pinto Well. The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit and not less than 600 feet from any existing well, not owned by the applicant. A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on October 10, 1999. under monitoring hole notice MN -36529-8.61.z 3 -os*� 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) =orm No. OFFICE OF TH. ;TATE ENGINEER GWS -25 COLORADO Dh dSION OF WATER RESOL►RCE 31a Cantenroai SIdg., 1313 Sherman St., Cenver, CaIcrdo 80203 (3C3: 333-21.-31 Pt ,MMT NUMSER 53232 -F APPLICANT DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD WC eiocx: Fong: Suociv: ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 31 3275 CO RD 100 Township 7 S Range 87 W Sixth P.M. CARBONDALE, CO 81623- (970) 963-9397 PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL (AMENDED) DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1603 Ft. from North Section Line 2220 Ft. from West Section Line PPRCVED State Engineer FEBLaNo. 0453792A DATE ISSUED B 1 7 2000 By`J ��8 i 7 EXPIRATION DATE TOTAL P.35 • • • BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT NO. 472 Pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 37-45-131 Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC (hereinafter "Applicant") has applied to the Basalt Water Conservancy District (hereinafter the "District"), a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 37-45-101, et seq., for an allotment Contract for beneficial use of water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution of this Contract, Applicant agrees to the following terms and conditions and those certain terms and conditions set forth in the attached Order, which is fully incorporated as a part of this Contract: 1. QUANTITY: In consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained, Applicant shall be entitled to receive and apply to beneficial use 0.056 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and 8.2 acre feet per year of storage or other augmentation water owned or controlled by the District. Applicant shall restrict actual diversions and consumptive use under this Contract to these amounts. The Contract amount is based on the water requirements table attached hereto as Exhibit B. Any increase or change in the water requirements to be served by the District will require an amendment to the subject Contract. 2. SOURCE OF ALLOTTED WATER: Water rights allotted pursuant to this Contract shall be from the District's water rights decreed to the Basalt Conduit, Landis Canal, Stockman's Ditch Extension, Troy and Edith Ditch, Robinson Ditch, or other water rights hereafter acquired by the District, including the District's right to receive storage water from Ruedi Reservoir and Green Mountain Reservoir. The District shall have the right to designate the water right or Decree of the District from which the Applicant's allotted rights shall be obtained. The Applicant's use of any of the District's water rights shall be subject to any and all terms and conditions imposed by the Water Court on the use of the District's said rights. Exchange or augmentation releases made from the District's storage rights in Ruedi or Green Mountain Reservoirs or other works and facilities of the District shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facility and release of water at such outlet works shall constitute full performance of the District's delivery obligation. Delivery of water from the District's storage rights in Ruedi or Green Mountain Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and any rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. Releases from other facilities available to the District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby expressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement is not impaired by said action. 0( \ WP.Cares \Kim BWCETCLIENTS K472 Aspen Equestnen Butes (Equestrian LoiN4 <R0913.05.h 1 • • • 3. PURPOSE AND LOCATION OF USE: Applicant will use the water rights allotted pursuant to this Contract for beneficial purposes by diversion at Applicant's point of diversion under the District's direct flow water rights and/or for use by augmentation or exchange. Applicant will use the water allotted by the District within or through facilities or upon lands owned, operated, or served by Applicant, which lands are described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto; provided that the location and purpose of Applicant's use of said water shall be legally recognized and permitted by the applicable governmental authority having jurisdiction over the property served. Applicant's contemplated usage for the water allotted hereunder is for the following use or uses: X Domestic/Municipal _ Industrial X Commercial Agricultural Other It is acknowledged that certain locations within the District may not be susceptible to service solely by the District's water rights allotted hereunder or the District's said water rights may not satisfy Applicant's needs and purposes. To the extent that service cannot be achieved by use of the District's allotted water rights, or in the event said service is inadequate, Applicant may utilize such other water rights, by way of supplementing the District's water rights, or otherwise, as is necessary to assure water service sufficiently reliable for Applicant's intended purpose or purposes. All lands, facilities and areas served by water rights allotted hereunder shall be situated within the boundaries of the District. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end of each water year, shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water. Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado State Engineer to estimate any conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate point and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case. The District, or anyone using the District's decrees, may call on any additional sources of supply that may be available at an alternate point of diversion, but not at the original point of diversion, only as against water rights which are junior to the date of application for the alternate point of diversion. In the event the Applicant intends to institute any legal proceedings for the approval of an augmentation plan and/or any change to an alternate point of diversion of the District's water right to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted hereunder, the Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates an alternate point of diversion and/or an augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to bear or defray any O\WP-Docswm\BWCO,CUENPVC 472 Aspen Equestrian Escorts (Equ.slnan LAO( a72.09.13.05.Ino 2 • • • legal or engineering expense of the District incurred by the District for the purpose of developing and adjudicating a plan of augmentation for the District. In any event, the District shall have the right to approve the Applicant's application for change of water right, and/or augmentation plan or other water supply plan involving the District's rights, and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such application and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the Water Court in the adjudication thereof. The District reserves the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judicial approval of Applicant's use of the District's water rights allotted hereunder. Applicant agrees to defray any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the District in connection with the allotment of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and engineering costs incurred in connection with any water rights adjudication necessary to allow Applicant's use of such allotted water rights; provided, however, in the event any such adjudication involves more of the District's water rights than are allotted pursuant to this Contract, Applicant shall bear only a pro -rata portion of such expenses. Applicant shall be solely responsible for providing the structures, works and facilities, if any, necessary to utilize the District's water rights allotted hereunder for Applicant's beneficial use. 4. PAYMENT: Applicant shall pay annually for the water service described herein at a price to be fixed annually by the Board of Directors of the District for such service. Payment of the annual fee shall be made, in full, within fifteen (15) days after the date of a notice from the District that the payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of the water delivery year to which the payment shall apply and the price which is applicable to that year. If a payment is not made by the due date, a late fee of $50 (or such other amount as the Board may set from time to time) will be assessed and final written notice of the delinquent account and late fee assessment will be sent by the District to the Applicant at Applicant's address set forth below. If payment is not made within thirty (30) days after said final written notice, the District may, at its option, elect to terminate all of the Applicant's right, title, or interest under this Contract, in which event the water right allotted hereunder may be transferred, leased or otherwise disposed of by the District at the discretion of its Board of Directors. In the event water deliveries hereunder are made by or pursuant to agreement with some other person, corporation, quasi -municipal entity, or governmental entity, and in the event the Applicant fails to make payments as required hereunder, the District may, at its sole option and request, authorize said person or entity to curtail the Applicant's water service pursuant to this Contract, and in such event neither the District nor such persons or entity shall be liable for such curtailment. 5. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS: The Applicant agrees that so long as this Contract is valid and in force, Applicant will budget and appropriate from such sources of revenues as may be legally available to the Applicant the funds necessary to make the annual payments in advance of water delivery pursuant to this Contract. The Applicant O:\Wr-Doc.V4mr13wCOCLI EMSV'. 472 Aspen Equestrian Estates (Equestrian InilVC 472 09.13.05.1,. 3 • • • will hold harmless the District and any person or entity involved in the delivery of water pursuant to this Contract, for discontinuance in service due to the failure of Applicant to maintain the payments herein required on a current basis. 6. BENEFIT OF CONTRACT: The water right allotted hereunder shall be beneficially used for the purposes and in the manner specified herein and this Contract is for the exclusive benefit of the Applicant and shall not inure to the benefit of any successor, assign, or lessee of said Applicant without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors of the District. Upon the sale of the real property to which this Contract pertains, Applicant has a duty to make the buyer aware of this Contract and the need to assign the Contract to the buyer. However, prior written approval of the Board of Directors of the District is required before the assignment is effective. Payment of an assignment fee in an amount determined by the Board shall be required as a prerequisite to approval of the assignment. In the event the water right allotted hereunder is to be used for the benefit of land which is now or will hereafter be subdivided or otherwise held or owned in separate ownership interest, the Applicant may assign the Applicant's rights hereunder only to a homeowners association, water district, water and sanitation district or other special district, or other entity properly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado, and then only if such association, entity or special district establishes to the satisfaction of the Basalt Water Conservancy District that it has the ability and authority to assure its performance of the Applicant's obligations under this Contract. In no event shall the owner of a portion, but less than all, of the Applicant's property to be served under this Contract have any rights hereunder, except as such rights may exist through a homeowners association or special district as above provided. Any assignment of the Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to and must comply with such requirements as the District has adopted or may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of Contract rights and the assumption of Contract obligations by assignees and successors, provided that such requirements shall uniformly apply to all allot - tees receiving District service. The restrictions on assignment as herein contained shall not preclude the District from holding the Applicant, or any successor to the Applicant, responsible for the performance of all or any part of the Applicant's covenants and agreements herein contained. 7. OTHER RULES: Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to the Water Service Plan as adopted by the District and amended from time to time; provided that such Water Service Plan shall apply uniformly throughout the District among water users receiving the same service from the District. Applicant shall also be bound by all applicable law, including, for example, the provisions of the Water Conservancy Act of the State of Colorado, the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Directors of the District, the plumbing advisory, water conservation, and staged curtailment regulations, if any, O:\WP-Doni4mHWCCACU ENTSK 472 Aspen Equestrian Ewan (Equestrian U'O'X 472. 09.13M5.km 4 • • • applicable within the County in which the water allotted hereunder is to be used, together with all amendments of and supplements to any of the foregoing. 8. CURTAILMENT OF USE: The water service provided hereunder is expressly subject to the provisions of that certain Stipulation in Case No. 81CW253 on file in the District Court in Water Division 5 of the State of Colorado, which Stipulation provides, in part, for the possible curtailment of out -of -house municipal and domestic water demands upon the occurrence of certain events and upon the District giving notice of such curtailment, all as more fully set forth in said Stipulation. 9. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Applicant shall enter into an "Operation and Maintenance Agreement" with the District if and when the Board of Directors finds and determines that such an agreement is required by reason of additional or special services requested by the Applicant and provided by the District or by reason of the delivery or use of water by the Applicant for more than one of the classes of service which are defined in the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Directors of said District. Said agreement may contain, but not be limited to, provision for water delivery at times or by means not provided within the terms of standard allotment contracts of the District and additional annual monetary consideration for extension of District services and for additional administration, operation and maintenance costs, or for other costs to the District which may arise through services made available to the Applicant. 10. CHANGE OF USE: The District reserves the exclusive right to review and approve or disapprove any proposed change in use of the water right allotted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotted hereunder without the prior written approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract. 11. PRIOR RESOLUTION: The water service provided hereunder is expressly subject to that certain Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the District on September 25, 1979, and all amendments thereto, as the same exists upon the date of this application and allotment Contract. 12. NO FEE TITLE: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall give the Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest or ownership in or to any of the water or water rights of the District, but that Applicant is entitled to the right to use the water right allotted hereunder, subject to the limitations, obligations and conditions of this Contract. 13. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. Applicant shall comply with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and consult with the Army Corps of Engineers to complete any Section 404 compliance that may be required as a result of the construction of any facilities necessary to use contract water. O:\WP-WoV4m\BWCP.CLtENTS\K 072 Aspen Equestrian Estates (Equestrian lotNK 472 09.13.05.1tm 5 • • • 14. CONSERVATION PRACTICES: Applicant shall implement and use com- monly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water rights allotted hereunder and shall be bound by any conservation plan hereafter adopted by the District, as the same may be amended from time to time. 15. WELL PERMIT: If Applicant intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit before the District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder, and it is the Applicant's continuous duty to maintain a valid well permit. Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well permit obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Applicant must comply with the well -spacing requirements set forth in C.R.S. §37-90-137, as amended, if applicable. Compliance with said statutory well -spacing criteria shall be an express condition of the extension of service hereunder, and the District shall in no way be liable for an Applicant's failure to comply. Applicant agrees to mark the well in a conspicuous place with the permit number. 16. MEASURING DEVICE OR METER: Applicant agrees to provide, at its own expense, a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously and accurately measure at all times all water diverted pursuant to the terms of Applicant's water right and the terms of this Contract. On or before November 15 of each year, will provide accurate readings from such device or meter (recorded on a monthly basis for the period November 1 through October 30 of each year) to District, the Division Engineer and Water Commissioner. Applicant acknowledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result in legal action to terminate Applicant's diversion of water by the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources. By signing this Contract, Applicant hereby specifically allows District, through its authorized agent, to enter upon Applicant's property during ordinary business hours for the purposes of determining Applicant's actual use of water. 17. CONTRACT TERMINATION: A. Termination by District: 1. The District may terminate this Contract for any violation or breach of the terms of this Contract by Applicant. 2. The District may terminate this Contract if, in its discretion, any judicial or administrative proceedings initiated by Applicant threaten the District's authority to contract for delivery or use of the District's water rights, or threaten the District's permits, water rights, or other interests of the District. B. Termination by Applicant: O:\WP.Do \ Kim \BWCUCLIENTS% 472 Aspen Equesmn bbbs(Equeslri.n LN(VC 4R 09.13.05.fnn 6 • • 1. Applicant may terminate this Contract in its entirety for any reason by notifying the District in writing of the termination on or before April 1. Notice by said date will prevent the Applicant's liability for the next annual contract charge. 18. RECORDING OF MEMORANDUM: In lieu of recording this Water Allotment Contract, a Memorandum of Water Allotment Contract will be recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office. The costs of recording the Memorandum shall be paid by Applicant. ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC, Applicant: Applicant's Mailing Address: Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC c/o Jay N. Weinberg, Manager 3275 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 Telephone: (970) 963-9397 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) y Weinberg, Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this f day of September, 2005, by Jay N. Weinberg as Manger on behalf of Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 40 My Commission Expires 0110512009 U\Wp-EbaVKim \BWCGCUENIS K 472 Aspen Equestrian Evert. (Equestnan LotpK 472.09.13A5.hm 7 1111111 IIIII'II1IlI 1 11111 1111 131 11111 III 111 Il `1111 549289 07/23/1999 10:47A 01141 P437 11 ALSDORF 3 of 4 R 20.08 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO • EXHIBIT . A 'ARCEL A: ► PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN A I't:R'I'LOU OF LOTS 3, 4, 6, 17, 18, AND 19 OF ;IECrION 31 TOWNSHIP 7 SOU'1'1I, RAIN;I' 07 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, 'OUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF C()I t)l'AIIU, SMD PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY )ESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ;OMMENCING AT THE WITNESS CORNER TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, A STONE IN PLACE, THENCE S AO DEGREES 01' 05" W 2350.39 FEET TO 171E ;OUTI[EAST CORNER OF RECEPTION No. 279416, ALSO BRING A POINT ON THE JESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY UoAD NO. 100, A REBAR AND CAP ..S. NO. 10732 IN PLACE, THE TRUE POINT OF )3EGINNING; THENCE S 00 DEGREES 1.1' 29" W ALONG SAID WESTERLY R.IU11I'-OF-WAY 027.14 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP J.S. NO. 10732 IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGA' -OF -WAY i 03 DEGREES 56' 29" W 117.74 FIRST '11) A RIM/1R AND CAP L.S. NO.10732 IN 'LACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG f;AII) WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY S 11 DEGREES 37' !7" W 299.44 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 72 DEGREES 11' 32" W ALONG A LINE BEING NOU'fIIERI.Y OF BLUE CREEK 136.34 FEET; THENCE .ONTINUING ALONG A LINE BEING NORTHERLY OF ULUE CREEK N 77 DEGREES 44' 52" i 317.09 FEET; THENCE CONTINUItNG; AI..uNG A LINE BEING NORTHERLY OF BLUE CREEK 4 62 DEGREES 48' 46" W 375.98 FRET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG A LINE BEING IORTIIERLY OF BLUE CREEK N 41 DEGREES 30' 29" W 89.74 FEET; THENCE :ON'1'INUING ALONG A LINE BEING NORTHERLY OF BLUE CREEK N 81 DEGREES 01' 17" 1. 285.92 FEET; THENCE N 13 DEGREES 12' 20" 8 120.00 FEET TO A POINT IN AN EXISTING FENCE; THENCE N 76 DEGREES 47' 40" W ALONG SAID EXISTING FENCE L 73 FEET TO A POINT ON TEE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "8" OF RECEPTION 5658 (FROM WHENCE REBAR'ALO) (.'AP L.S. NO. 10732 BEARS S 00 DEGREES 00' L 263.20 FEET) : THENCE N 1111 DEGREES 00' 18" E ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE L013.61 FEET TO A POINT ON 'I'l1E st)IJ'1'IIIERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE IIGIIWAY NO. 82 AS EVIDENCED BY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS AND THE :EXISTING CENTERLINE (WHENCE A 11RIIAI1 AND CAP L.S. N0. 3317 BEARS S 00 )RGI1EES 00' 18" W 3.99 FEET) ; 'J'IIIRII"R S 79 DEGREES 56' 55" 8 ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 1982.77 FEET; THENCE S 10 DEGREES 30' 58" W ALONG 171E EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RECEPTION 1N0. 279416 133.47 FEET TO A REBAR AND 2AP L.S. NO. 10732 IN PLACE; TIIl1It'IR S 79 DEGREES 44' 32" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID RECEPTIUII 111). 279416 247.29 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT DF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL B: 1 R 20 FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMIRII'I' t)VI:R, UIIOHR, AND ACROSS THE bOU'r1IWESTERLY • !49l09A011191919111 /121/1111919191104T111511411111 4I35 I N of Af I_SIi IOIOtRiFl iii l 4 R 28.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO AND WESTERLY 20 FEET OF LOT 12, AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 RANCH AT ROARING FORK, PHASE V, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT THEREOF. THE EASEMENT CENTERLINE IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 12, AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 RANCH AT ROARING FORK, PHASE V: THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 07' 35" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 12 A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO 'I'IIE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO AND 10 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLE TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 A DISTANCE OF 94.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 39' 41" WEST PARALLEL TO AND 10 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLE TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 12 A DISTANCE OF 145.87 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE CURVED NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 12, THE CENTERLINE TERMINUS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO • GE 3 • 1 EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 OF 2 • • • u) 0 0 N r U)sa E 0) CD 0 u) N N 3 0) (0 0(0 (1) a Source Series: Maximum Demand 0 lL U a 0 (13) Source of Aug/Replace wwwwwwwwwwww CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC Consumptive Use (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)' Comm. Pond Lawn Crop In-house Evap. Irrigation Irrigation Livestock TOTAL r` u) N (0 (D 0 r` (D a0 O O ;- TrOO cr N V W T'. 0 0 OD ( l OD CD OD T- O O O O O r.- 0 0 0 0 0 I...- `V up (O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0N f0 ,f ,r (0 O O O 000(0O0)(OOu) W OO 0 0 0 0 (l C ,r M N 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O C0 u) O N O M O O (O OV CD O 00 0 0 0 N cc) u) u) u) (h N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.750 O r- o o) 0 0) 0 0 0) 0 0) O (h N M N O7 N M M N M N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) u) Ch 0 Total Demand (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)' Commercial Pond Lawn Crop In-house Evap. Irrigation Irrigation Livestock TOTAL (O 7 O r N- r- u) v a0 r- (D O u) u)N N 0 V O (O R r r` a0 0 (0 00 0 u) C) O r- r - CD 0 0 o o 14.049 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o o 0 O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O) N 0 a0 N o 0 O O o O O,t OO u) V) r) - 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O r - (A N 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O M,- V N C OO 0 (D u) N M V 0 u) u) C) N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 O 0 0 0 0 O u) 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.060 Month N N N L a t y aEi a E E c ->• c >, 0) Q. O> 0 C (0 `n (0 C > 0) 0 0 0) �(i2a2��¢(n0z❑ TOTALS --> i EXHIBIT 13 PAGE 1 OF 2 i BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER REQUIREMENTS z 0 N • OL w o Ea Uco ❑ N W 2 0 0 0 J -J N d N w c N LT w 811 N : Q 0 0 Csi N d E N CL cn Q 0 LO Water User m Q N 0 Source Series: Maximum Demand: a 0 8 D m 0 a a Cr ( Q W w W W W w W W W W W W CCW W CtrYCYCLCCCLCLCYCL Consumptive Use (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)' Domestic Commercial Lawn Crop In-house or Other Irrigation Irrigation Livestock TOTAL N D) N N (.7) M CO 0 (n 0 0 N N N O O) f• O V 0 CO N N O O O O N C7 M N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N- •- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 o o o o V' (o 0 CO (D (D 0 O O O 0 gq�}} (D C') N O- u') O 0 O O O O N (7 C7 N 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V' o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0.000 N N N N O N N N N N N N 000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V N O Total Demand (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)* Domestic Pond Lawn Crop In-house Evap. Irrigation Irrigation Livestock TOTAL c+) CO ( ) (D N- (0 N 0 V 0 O^ M V() cr C I- CO CO 1- c0 0 V V o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.878 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O O O (A co N 0 (D N fN O 0 O O O 0 (`i C N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n N- .- O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O o o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-- .- Q) r 0) N- .- O) - Q) •- C CO V' CO 7 CO d' •T co co V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.800 Month 6) cii .o L 2 L 7 N d N N D ,p 1U�0 _ 10 c a j -> 0 coci�Q2,-)acn0z❑ TOTALS --> to • • ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ALLOTMENT CONTRACT ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC CONTRACT NO. 472 Application having been made by or on behalf of Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC and hearing on said Application having been duly held, it is hereby ordered that said Application be granted and that the attached Water Allotment Contract for 0.056 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and 8.2 acre feet per year of storage/augmentation water owned or controlled by the District is hereby approved and executed by and on behalf of the Basalt Water Conservancy District, for the beneficial use of the water allotted in the attached Contract, upon the terms, conditions and manner of payment as therein specified and subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The Applicant has acknowledged that the land to be benefitted by the attached Contract is described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. In the event of the division of the property served by this Contract into two or more parcels owned by different persons, the Applicant shall establish a Homeowners Association or other entity acceptable to the District for the ongoing payment of charges due under the approved Contract following subdivision of the property. The Applicant shall give notice to purchasers of all or any part of the subject property of the obligation of this Contract, and shall record such notice in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Applicant and his successors and assigns shall comply with all rules and regulations now existing or hereafter adopted by the District, including to enforce payment of charges due under the approved Contract by present and future owners of all or any part of the real property served under this Contract. 3. Any allotment of less than 1.0 acre foot of storage water in Paragraph 1 of the attached Contract shall be deemed 1.0 acre foot for purposes of establishing the annual water service charge for such water allotment. 4. Applicant has represented to the District that the proposed use of the land to be benefitted by the water allotted hereunder has been approved by the applicable governmental authorities having jurisdiction over such land use and by executing the attached water allotment contract warrants to the District that the lot or parcel to be benefitted hereunder is legally subdivided. 5. Any well permits issued on the basis of this Allotment Contract shall be applied for and issued in the name of the Applicant. O:1WP.Docs1Kim18WCD2CLIENTS'K 472 Aspen Equestrian Eames IEquovun LmllOnfer K 42. 09.13.01.frm -1- • • • 6. By acceptance of this Contract, Applicant acknowledges that within two years of the date hereof or such later date as the District may approve, the Applicant shall file with the Water Court of Water Division No. 5 a water rights plan of augmentation for utilization of water allotted hereunder at the location and for the purposes hereinabove set forth, or the Applicant's water allotment as provided in this Contract may be included in a water rights plan of augmentation to be filed by the District with the expenses thereof to be shared prorata by the Contract holders included in such plan; provided that inclusion of the Applicant's water allotment in the District's plan of augmentation shall be at the District's sole discretion. In the event the District includes the Applicant's water allotment in the District's Application for a plan of augmentation, the Applicant acknowledges that execution of the subject contract constitutes waiver of any notice of the application for the plan for augmentation by the Water Referee or the Water Clerk under C.R.S. § 37-92-302(3)(c)(I). Applicant will provide such information and assistance, including testimony, as may be needed for judicial approval of the plan. The District makes no warranty that it will secure approval of the plan. The District may establish an augmentation plan fee to be paid by the holder of any Contract or amended Contract to be included within a plan of augmentation to be filed by the District, which fee shall be payable in advance of the inclusion of such Contract in a District plan of augmentation and may be based on the District's good faith estimate of the anticipated expense of such plan of augmentation. If such augmentation plan fee paid by a Contract holder exceeds the Contract holder's prorata portion of the actual expenses incurred by the District in completing said plan of augmentation, the District shall refund such excess to the Contract holder. Conversely, if such augmentation plan fee paid by the Contract holder does not cover the Contract holder's prorata portion of the actual expenses incurred by the District in completing said plan of augmentation, then Applicant shall pay the remaining balance of its portion of the actual expenses upon the District's providing the holder with a statement for the same. To the extent that the District is caused additional costs because of objections filed specifically due to the inclusion of Applicant's Contract in the filing, such additional costs may be charged specifically to Applicant and not shared on a prorata basis by all Contractees. However, by acceptance of this Contract, Applicant acknowledges that it shall be responsible for any adjudication of the water right associated with the Applicant's pond. The Contract allots storage/augmentation water of the District to augment evaporative losses from the surface area of the pond, but the Applicant acknowledges that the District will not be responsible for adjudicating a water right or priority date for the pond in any future water rights plan of augmentation filed by the District. In its sole discretion, the District may include the augmentation of the evaporative losses from the pond in a future augmentation plan filing (as above described), but only after the Applicant provides the District with a decree of court which adjudicates the water right and priority associated with the pond. In the event that the District includes the augmentation of the evaporative 0:1W P-DIC.\Kim\BWCD\CLIENTS1K 472 Aspen E9unvian Esuva IEQucsvun Lo0NOrder K 472. 09.17.03.12m -2- losses in a future augmentation plan filing, the Applicant shall pay the District's costs • associated with the plan (as above described). • • 7. Any and all conditions imposed upon the release and diversion of water allotted hereunder in any water rights plan of augmentation or other water rights decree of the Water Court for Water Division No. 5 shall be incorporated herein as a condition of approval of this contract. Granting of this allotment contract does not constitute the District's representation that the Applicant will receive a well permit or water rights decree for the land to be benefitted hereby. 8. If Applicant intends to divert water through a well or wells, Applicant shall provide the District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit for each such well before the District is obligated to deliver water for the benefit of Applicant hereunder. Applicant must comply with the well -spacing requirements set forth in C.R.S. §37-90-137, as amended, if applicable. Compliance with said statutory well -spacing criteria shall be an express condition of the extension of service hereunder, and the District shall in no way be liable for an Applicant's failure to comply. Approved this 13th day of September, 2005. Attest: Barbara Mick, Secretary 0:1WP-D(rstKlmtBWEEKL1EM3\K 172 Aspen Equestrian Estates I Equnnun IIIbrtler K 472. 03.12.05.fim BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT -3- K. Cerise, President September 9, 2005 Mr. Tom Zancanella Zancanella & Associates, Inc. 1011 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 FIRE • EMS • RESCUE Re: Aspen Equestrian Estates Commercial Center Dear Tom: As per your request in your December 3, 2004 letter, the Carbondale Rural Fire Department has reviewed the proposed plans dated November 30, 2004 for the Aspen Equestrian Estates neighborhood commercial district. The additional residential and existing equestrian center are served by the Aspen Equestrian Estates/Blue Creek Water System, which has been tested at a rate of 1500 gpm. A fire protection system of at least 2500 gpm served by the pond or in combination with the existing system with a usable pond storage volume of at least 300,000 gallons should be adequate to protect commercial buildings up to 4000 square feet as indicated on the plans. This assumes that 2500 gpm fire flow would be provided for a minimum of two hours. Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District 300 Meadowood Drive • Carbondale, CO 81623 • 970/963-2491 Fax 963-0569 Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 July 15, 2005 Reference: Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC Dear Ron, This letter will confirm that the Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Association, Inc., has agreed to provide sewer treatment services to Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, for up to 70 EQRs pursuant to the terms and conditions of an agreement between the parties with an effective date of May 13, 2005. Sincerely, Grge ' D • " Doxey R. Manager 14913 Highway 82 • Carbondale, Colorado 81623 • (970) 963-3500 AT ROARING FORK M M Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Reference: Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC July 12, 2005 Dear Ron, Thank you for your assistance in assisting the Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC and the Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Association amending the Sewer Service Agreement. As of this date July 12, 2005 the Ranch at Roaring Fork Homeowners Association has agreed to provide 64 additional EQRs for use in residential and commercial applications as defined in the First Amendment to the Sewer Service Agreement. Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC has paid for these 64 additional in full for the amount of $480.000. Cordially, orge "Doc" Doxey Ranch Manager 14913 Highway 82 • Carbondale. Colorado 81623 • (970) 963-3500 IP op 411) 4.08.05 (7) (e)(iii) DRAINAGE (iii) The proposed method in which storm drainage will be handled, demonstrating that adjoining property owners would not be damaged by the development; and (A97-109) DRAINAGE REPORT — High Country Engineering, Inc., September 23, 2005 37 to • • SKETCH PLAN DRAINAGE REPORT FOR ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES: COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR: Aspen Equestrian Estates 3275 County Road 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 PREPARED BY: High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 HCE JOB NO. 2041030.00 x 0417 September 23, 2005 Deron Dircksen, E.I. Design Engineer Reviewed by: Roger D. Neal, P.E. Principal Colorado Registered Professional Engineer No. 29975 11, TABLE OF CONTENTS • I. Purpose 2 II. Introduction 2 III. Hydrology 2 IV. Drainage Plan 3 V. Summary 3 V. References 4 Figures: 1) Vicinity Map (81/2" x 11") 2) Portion of FEMA Floodway Map for the Development (81/2" x 11") 3) SCS Soils Map (81/2" x 11") 4) Existing Drainage Plan (11" x 17") 5) Proposed Drainage Plan (11" x 17") 6) NOAA-2YR (8%2" x 11") 7) NOAA — 25YR (81/2" x 11") 8) NOAA — 100YR (81/2" x 11") 9) Offsite Drainage Map (81/2" x 11") APPENDIX: Hydrology Calculations Additional Information 1 k:/wp/file/204/ I 030/drainage study-sketch_doc 4101 I. PURPOSE r • This Sketch Plan Drainage Report has been prepared to conform to the Garfield County Drainage Criteria. The specific scope of work of this study includes the following: 1. Refine the conceptual drainage system and identify in greater detail the impacts which may occur both on-site and off-site as a result of the proposed development. 2. Calculate projected developed storm water runoff for the minor 25 -year and major 100 -year storm events from the development. 3. Present design criteria and calculations for the storm drain system to handle these events. 4. Determine the downstream effects of this storm water runoff. II. INTRODUCTION Preshana Farm P.U.D. Equestrian Lot \ Commercial Development is located on the southerly portion of the original Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision P.U.D. plat dated August 30, 2000. The Preshana Farm P.U.D. encompasses 15.21 acres and the Commercial Development is 3.31 acres of this P.U.D. The proposed property is bounded by Catherine's store and Colorado State Highway 82 on the north, County Road 100 on the east, and Aspen Equestrian Estates on the south and west. Please see the enclosed Vicinity Map for the site location. The proposed subdivision is not located in the Roaring Fork River floodplain. The FEMA map can be seen in figure 2. III. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the Soil Conservation Service publication "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado" (1980) and the Soil Conservation Service's TR -55. There are currently two (2) houses, (2) barns, and (2) equestrian arenas on site. The existing vegetation consists of fallow soil and good open space with more than 75% coverage. The developed condition will have additional impervious and semi -impervious areas such as roofs, sidewalks, and driveways as well as more landscaped areas. The proposed development consists of 5 commercial buildings, each having approximately 4,000 s.f. of floor area, four proposed lots, and a pond with landscaping around it. The curve numbers have been provided in the Appendix. Peak on-site flows for this site will be primarily rainfall derived since the entire development is below 8,000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the storm drainage system should be more than adequate to handle on-site spring snowmelt runoff. 2 k:/wp/file/204/ 1 030/drainage study -sketch .doc Op IV. DRAINAGE PLAN SD • Basin EX -1 (3.31 acres) The historic runoff pattern is mostly to the west and contributes Q25 = 2.83 cfs and Qioo = 3.91 cfs. Basin EX -2 (11.90 acres) The historic runoff pattern is mostly to the west and contributes Q25 = 3.99 cfs and Q100= 5.86 cfs. Basin PR -1 (3.31 acres) The proposed runoff pattern will be similar to the historic pattern. The proposed runoff will sheet flow west to the proposed parking area, and then be conveyed west by curb and gutter. The curb and gutter will convey the stormwater to the proposed pond. This pond will help with water quality before being released into the Roaring Fork River. The proposed conditions contribute Q25 = 2.15 cfs and Qioo = 3.05 cfs. Basin PR -2 (11.90 acres) The proposed runoff pattern will be similar to the historic pattern. The runoff will be routed either to the proposed pond, to it's historic location or to Equestrian Way. The proposed basin will remove existing structures so that four proposed houses can be built. The pond and landscaped area adjacent to the pond are also within this basin. The proposed conditions contribute Q25 = 2.66 cfs and Qioo = 4.63 cfs No detention is proposed for this development because the release rate for proposed conditions is lower that historic rates. Other minor offsite basins that affect this property are located along the north side of Highway 82. Multiple culverts convey flow under Highway 82 to the proposed development. These historic stormwater flows and the irrigation tail -water will be conveyed around the property and will be released at existing conditions. The offsite basin will be analyzed further during the preliminary drainage report. The offsite basin can be seen on Figure 9 — Offsite Drainage Map. V. SUMMARY The proposed Commercial Development at Aspen Equestrian Estates is located in Garfield County, CO. The proposed conditions will have runoff rates less than historic rates, so no detention is required. The proposed development will have a landscape pond, which will be used as a water quality feature. 3 k:/wp/fiIe/2O4/ 1 030/dratnage study -sketch .doc se • is VI. REFERENCES National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Precipitation -Frequency Atlas of the Western United States, Volume III -Colorado. Silver Springs, MD 1973. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service: Soil Survey of Aspen - Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties, May 1992. 4 k:/wp/file/204/ 1 030/drainage study-sketch.doc HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 9250547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, C0 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8678 FAX (970) 945-2555 W W W.HCENG.COM PRESHANA FARM PUD AMEND GARFIELD COUNTY. CO REGIONAL MAP DRAWN BY: MRL SCALE: 1" = 4000' CHECKED BY: REW PROJECT No: 2041030.00 DATE: 9-2-05 PAGE 1 FILE: VICINITY 26 r-, 25 lig 30 LIMIT OF DETAILED STUDY LIMIT OF DETAILED STUDY nY _ e SUB• PRI)P RTY LIMIT OF DETAILED STUDY RM3S 35 36 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 1000 0 1000 HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 9250544 FAX (303) 9250547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLEN WOOD SPRINGS, CO 81801 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 9452555 W W W.HCENG.COM NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOODWAY FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) PANEL 1880 OF 1900 MEE MAP IarOEX FOR PAM ELS NOT .Rua MS1 COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 080205 1880 MAP REVISED: JANUARY 3, 1986 Federal Emergency Management Agency ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY. CO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN FEMA MAP FIGURE 2 DRAWN BY: DJD KEY TO MAP SOO-Year Flood Boundary I00.Year Flood Boundary FLOODWAY FRINGE 100.Year Flood Boundary 100.Y.a1 Flood Boundary AWOXWEt 100.Year FMad Boundary Cross Sullen Line C F Eh ration Reference Mart RM7X R,rer Mne .41.5 NOTES TO USER Bounties of the f oodwaya were mmputed , and Mtere pnlatod bmwn c sections. The Roadways were hydraulicbated on coroideratiom with reoard b repu wiremen M the Federal Emergency Manapemonr RS.", This map was propend w fatllltate flood plain management mtivinas only; it ail special flood hazard u M the community Or W+nim vie futures outside of an nese Main. R r efhlM Flood Insurance Rate Map for any additional areas of 'Rectal flood hazard. Floodway widren in some arm may ler too narrow to show to scala Refer to Fl*edway Data Table Mere nood.ay width is ...on M WO inch. For adjoining map panels, me separauly print. Index To Map O wwWW Eny nava been .se ,*to m. se en d. nery taro, For try eerier a rree P.n oma num owns... FEW FlRriaw SW Ew a'.W �E SCALE: 111=2000' CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: REW 2041030.00 DATE: PAGE: 1 1-30-04 2 FILE: J:/SDSKPROJ/204/1030/DWG/FEMA.Dwc SOIL MAP SYMBOL: 13 SOIL NAME: ATENCIO-AZELTINE COMPLEX, 3 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES. HYDROLOGIC GROUP: B DEEP AND WELL DRAINED, PERMEABILITY IS IS MODERATE TO RAPID. HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945.2555 W W W.HCENG.COM ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY. CO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN SOILS MAP FIGURE 3 DRAWN BY: DJD SCALE: 1 " = 2000' CHECKED BY: REW PROJECT NO: 2041030.00 DATE: PAGE: 11-30-04 3 FILE. J:/SDSKPROJ/204/1030/DWG/SCS.DWG 3/44(LW3 4:1o:33 Hirt • 1 1 I I r t � 1 ,,poesieellf.r■ 6Biro®s�iffmosii11®e i��a� f - c. 1 L 11 X A 0 A p p A m V O Z ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES ,�Ce�ti, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING INC. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO �V, �� 1 r. - �1�, '�• ASPEN EQUESTRIAN•COMMERCIAL' 14INVERNPHONE(ESS 03)925E EAST, STEF•120,ENGLEWOOD,coeo112 C PHONE (303) 82508d4 FAX (303) D250847 `L EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN ° L11', Gf 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, 0081801 L(/R FIGURE4 C�NF_F_R�r PHONE fD701 WWW.HCe 6AG0(M 70I D452S58 °R" °r DJD NO. DATE REVISION BY CALL UflLfiY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 OR 534 -Ofi7OO IN METRO DENVER CALL2-BUSINEUSDAYSIAOEORCE EXCAVATE FOR TDFO�MAAROKINGOF UNDERGROUND FOR THARKING OF CHECKED Sr. REW DATE. 9.22-05 FILE. EXDR N ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN -COMMERCIAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN FIGURE 5 AOM. 0 U1 n H COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F•120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 8 PHONE (303) 520844 FAX (303) 5280847 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81801 PHONE (970) 9488878 FAX (970) 948.2555 DRAWN EPC DJD NO. DATE REVISION BY CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 OR 534.06700 IN METRO DENVER CALL 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DH,GRADGEBVEONOFWWW.HCCNG.COM UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTLlTIES CHECKED R6 30,5: 9-22-05 PRDR GRAPHIC SCALE 20000 0 10003 20000 b- IaFEET > 1 inch-40000ft ISOPLUVIALS OF 2 -YR 24 -HR PRECIPITATION IN Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture, TENTHS OF AN INCH Soil •Conservation Service, Engineering Division NOAH ATLAS 2, Volume ill Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY, CO 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLEN WOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945-2555 W W W.HCENG-COM ASPEN EQUESTRIAN EXHIBIT #6 NOAA - 2YEAR DRAWN BY: DJD SCALE. ("=40000' CHECKED BY: REW PROJECT No. 2041 030.00 DATE: 9-15-05 PAGE: 6 FILE: J:/505KPROJ/204/ 1030/ DWG/NOAA-2YR.DWG b Eta sig HIC SCALE En r 1 =CO NOAA'ATLAS 2, Volume 111 (> Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce 1 tach-40000rr- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service, Mice a of Hydrology ISOPLUVIALS OF 25 -YR 24 HR PRECIPITATION Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sail Conservation Service En:lneerin Division IN TENTHS OF AN INCH HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 9250547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945.2555 W W W.HCENG.COM SPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY. CO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN EXHIBIT #7 NOAA - 25YEAR DRAWN BY: DJD SCALE: 1' = 40000' CHECKED 8Y: PEW PROJECT NO: 2041030.00 DATE: PAGE: 9-1505 7 FILE: J:/sosKFRo.I/204/ 1030/DWG/NOAA-25YR-DWG .000 GRAPHIC SCALE 40300 ( IN FET) 1 inch _ 400001L NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume i11 Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administratioi ISt�PLUVIAI.S OF 100 -YR 24 -HR PRECIPITATIONNationalWeather Service, lice ofl-iy�trolc�g�,r IN TENTHS OF AN INCH Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 801 12 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 9250547 1 SI 7 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLEN WOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945-2555 W W W.HCENG.COM SPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY, CO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN EXHIBIT #8 NOAA -100YEAR DRAWN BY: DJD SCALE: 1 " = 40000' CHECKED BY: PROJECT No: REW 2041030.00 DATE: PAGE: 9-15-05 8 FILE: J: /SDSKPROJ /204/) 030/DWG/NOAA- I OOYR.D W G F2P.SHANA 'FARM 'AUSTRIAN-.L;OT~ MASTER_PLAN HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 801 12 PHONE (303) 9250544 FAX (303) 9250547 15 I BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLEN WOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945-2555 W W W.HCENG.COM ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES GARFIELD COUNTY. CO PRESHANA FARM PUD FIGURE 9 OFFSITE BASIN MAP DRAWN BY: DJD SCALE: I" = 3000' CHECKED BY: RDN PROJECT NO: 2041030.00 DATE: 9-23-05 PAGE: 9 FILE: J:/SDSKPROJ/204/1030/DWG/BASINOFF.DWG et • • HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS sr Q,ex-1,25yr.txt ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description EX -1, 25YR Rainfall Distribution Type 11 Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 3.3100 ac Peak Time 738.0000 min Peak Flow 2.8326 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ex -1 Support Data: Subarea Name: ex -1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 3.3100 84 19.3879 0.0000 2.2000 Description Manning's n 0.0500 Flow Length 228.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land slope 0.0110 ft/ft Computed sheet flow time > 16.3164 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 18.0000 min in row <1>. shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface Unpaved Flow Length 323.0000 ft watercourse slope 0.0118 ft/ft velocity 1.7527 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 3.0715 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 18.0000 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 19.3879 min Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number FALLOW 2.9800 86 GRASS 0.3300 61 Total Area > 3.3100 84 < weighted CN Page 1 • • Q,ex-1,25yr.txt Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 18.0000 min in row <1>. Page 2 • r Q,ex-1,100yr.txt ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description EX -1, 100YR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 3.3100 ac Peak Time 738.0000 min Peak Flow 3.9074 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ex -1 Support Data: Subarea Name: ex -1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 3.3100 84 19.3879 0.0000 2.6000 Description Manning's n 0.0500 Flow Length 228.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0110 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 16.3164 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 18.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface Unpaved Flow Length 323.0000 ft watercourse Slope 0.0118 ft/ft velocity 1.7527 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 3.0715 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 18.0000 min in row <1>. *J. Total Time of Concentration > 19.3879 min Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number FALLOW 2.9800 86 GRASS 0.3300 61 Total Area > 3.3100 84 < Page 1 weighted CN Q,ex-1,100yr.txt 4110pMessages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 18.0000 min in row <1>. • • Page 2 41101ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW • • Q,EX-2,25yr.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description EX -2, 25YR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 11.9000 ac Peak Time 756.0000 min Peak Flow 3.9899 cfs Given Input Data: subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) EX -2 Support Data: Subarea Name: EX -2, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 11.9000 76 38.4496 0.0000 2.2000 Description Manning's n 0.1000 Flow Length 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0117 ft/ft Computed sheet flow time > 34.5208 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface Unpaved Flow Length 386.0000 ft Watercourse Slope 0.0103 ft/ft velocity 1.6375 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 3.9288 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 38.4496 min Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description FALLOW Area (ac) Curve Number 5.3800 86 Page 1 a• • w Q,Ex-2,25yr.txt GRASS 5.3800 61 ROOFS 1.1400 98 Total Area > 11.9000 76 < weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Page 2 4Ib Q,EX-2,100yr.txt ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description EX -2, 100YR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 11.9000 ac Peak Time 756.0000 min Peak Flow 5.8599 cfs Given Input Data: subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) EX -2 Support Data: Subarea Name: EX -2, Row: 1 sheet Flow 11.9000 76 38.4496 0.0000 2.6000 Description Manning's n 0.1000 Flow Length 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0117 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 34.5208 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface unpaved Flow Length 386.0000 ft watercourse Slope 0.0103 ft/ft velocity 1.6375 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 3.9288 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. AAJAAAAJ.A.H....J.J....A1....*... J.A i.J. J.. ... AA Total Time of Concentration > 38.4496 min * A A AA A A AA A A AA AA A A AA A A A AAA... A A Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description FALLOW Area (ac) Curve Number 5.3800 86 Page 1 • • • Q,EX-2,100yr.txt GRASS 5.3800 61 ROOFS 1.1400 98 Total Area > 11.9000 76 < weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Page 2 411011ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW • • Q,pr-1,25yr.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description PR -1, 25YR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation on Total Area 3.3200 ac Peak Time 738.0000 min Peak Flow 2.1535 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) pr -1 Support Data: Subarea Name: pr -1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 3.3200 82 23.0885 0.0000 2.2000 Description Manning's n 0.2400 Flow Length 60.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0120 ft/ft Computed sheet flow time > 18.9966 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 24.0000 min in row <1>. shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface Paved Flow Length 558.0000 ft Watercourse Slope 0.0125 ft/ft velocity 2.2728 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 4.0919 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 24.0000 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 23.0885 min Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number landscape 1.4500 61 asphalt, building 1.8700 98 Total Area > 3.3200 82 < Page 1 weighted CN Q,pr-1,25yr.txt IIIIIIMessages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 24.0000 min in row <1>. • Page 2 illiASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW 411 Q,pr-1,100yr.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description PR -1, 100YR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 3.3200 ac Peak Time 738.0000 min Peak Flow 3.0452 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) pr -1 Support Data: Subarea Name: pr -1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 3.3200 82 23.0885 0.0000 2.6000 Description Manning's n 0.2400 Flow Length 60.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0120 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 18.9966 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 24.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface Paved Flow Length 558.0000 ft Watercourse slope 0.0125 ft/ft Velocity 2.2728 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 4.0919 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 24.0000 min in row <1>. ***.....a.*.A..AA..A.....a. Total Time of Concentration > 23.0885 min Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number landscape 1.4500 61 asphalt, building 1.8700 98 Total Area > 3.3200 82 < Page 1 weighted CN Q,pr-1,100yr.txt 4110Iressages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 24.0000 min in row <1>. • It Page 2 • • Q,PR-2,25yr.txt ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description PR -2, 25YR Rainfall Distribution Type 11 Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 11.9000 ac Peak Time 756.0000 min Peak Flow 2.6638 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) PR -2 Support Data: Subarea Name: PR -2, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 11.9000 72 37.6391 0.0000 2.2000 Description Manning's n 0.1000 Flow Length 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0117 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 34.5208 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. shallow concentrated Flow Description Surface Paved Flow Length 386.0000 ft Watercourse Slope 0.0103 ft/ft velocity 2.0631 fps Computed shallow flow time > 3.1183 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. AAAAAAAAA *A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Total Time of Concentration > 37.6391 min AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA J*.Ii..1. 4...JL.IL A AA A A AA Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number landscape 7.7500 61 asphalt, building 2.6700 98 Page 1 • r • Q,PR-2,25yr.txt FALLOW 1.4800 86 Total Area > 11.9000 72 < weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Page 2 /*ASPEN EQUESTRIAN 2041030.00 SKETCH DRAINAGE STUDY BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW • lb Q,PR-2,100yr.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description PR -2, 100YR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 11.9000 ac Peak Time 756.0000 min Peak Flow 4.6333 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) PR -2 Support Data: Subarea Name: PR -2, Row: 1 Sheet Flow 11.9000 72 37.6391 0.0000 2.6000 Description Manning's n 0.1000 Flow Length 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.0117 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 34.5208 min Messages: Info: Time of concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow concentrated Flow Description surface Paved Flow Length 386.0000 ft Watercourse slope 0.0103 ft/ft velocity 2.0631 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 3.1183 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 37.6391 min AA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description landscape Area (ac) Curve Number 7.7500 61 Page 1 • Q,PR-2,100yr.txt asphalt, building 2.6700 98 FALLOW 1.4800 86 Total Area > 11.9000 72 < weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.0000 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. M • ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT flP2041030.00 x0417 11/30/04 BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL AREA (s.f.) = TOTAL AREA (acre) = CONTRIBUTING AREA EX -1 Open Space Fallow Bare Soil 662,385.63 15.21 0.33 2.98 3.31 EX -2 Roofs 1.14 Open Space 5.38 Fallow Bare Soil 5.38 11.90 Time of Concentration EX -1 sheet flow: 228' @ 1.10% shallow flow: 323' @ 1.18% ft) EX -2 sheet flow: shallow flow: Soil Type B 300' @ 1.17% 386' @ 1.03% RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER Open Space - Good (>75% grass) = 61 Fallow Bare Soil: Curve Number = 86 Roofs = 98 Rainfall 2 -year, 24-hour: 1.2 inches 25 -year, 24-hour: 2.2 inches 100 -year, 24-hour: 2.6 inches ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 0 2041030.00 x0417 October 11, 2004 BY: DJD CHECKED BY: REW PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOTAL AREA (s.f.) = TOTAL AREA (acre) = CONTRIBUTING AREA PR -1 LANDSCAPE ASPHALT/BUILDING/ETC. 662,385.63 15.21 1.44 1.87 PR -2 ASPHALT/BUILDING/POND 2.67 LANDSCAPE 7.75 Fallow Bare Soil 1.48 11.9 Time of Concentration PR -1 sheet flow: 60' @ 1.20% shallow flow: 558' @ 1.25% SD PR -2 sheet flow: shallow flow: sp Soil Type B 300' @ 1.17% 386' @ 1.03% RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER LANDSCAPE (OPEN SPACE -GOOD, GREATER THAN 75% GRASS) 61 ASPHALT/BUILDING/ETC. (PAVED LOTS ROOFS AND DRIVEWAYS) 98 FALLOW BARE SOIL: 86 Rainfall 2 -year, 24-hour: 1.2 inches 25 -year, 24-hour: 2.2 inches 100 -year, 24-hour: 2.6 inches M 4.08.05 (7) (e)(iv) NATRUAL HAZARDS (iv) The proposed method in which provision will be made for any potential natural hazards in the area such as avalanche areas, landslide areas, flood plain areas. and unstable soils, and the extent and mitigation of such hazard(s); (A. 97-109) The portion of the PUD subject to this amendment is not impacted by any natural hazard as was documented at the time of the original PUD approval. The attached report discusses soil conditions at the site. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY — HP Geotechnical, Inc., November 30, 2004 38 Flpit ech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AREA PRESHANA FARMS P.U.D. (ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES) STATE HIGHWAY 82 AND COUNTY ROAD 100 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 739 NOVEMBER 30, 2004 PREPARED FOR: ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC ATTN: JAY WEINBERG 3275 COUNTY ROAD 100 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 r TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING - 2 FIELD EXPLORATION - 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT - 4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 5 - FOUNDATIONS - 5 FLOOR SLABS - 6 _ - SURFACE DRAINAGE - POND AND SITE GRADING - 7 - LIMITATIONS - 8 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURES 5 and 6 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a geotechnical engineering study for a proposed neighborhood commercial area in the northeast part of the Preshana Fanns P.U.D. (Aspen Equestrian Estates), southwest corner of County Road 100 and Highway 82, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the preliminary foundation and grading designs. The study was conducted in general accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC dated October 11, 2004, Proposal No. 151-04. We previously performed a preliminary geotechnical study for the Preshana Farms P.U.D. and presented our findings in a report dated August 31, 1998, Job No. 198 501. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for preliminary foundation and site grading designs. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed development and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed commercial area will be about 3 to 4 acres in size consisting of 5 lots as shown on Figure 1. We assume the proposed buildings will be one and two story structures with slab -on -grade ground floors. Grading for the structures is expected to be relatively minor with cut and fill depths up to about 3 to 4 feet. We assume relatively light to moderate foundation loadings, typical of the assumed type of construction. Job No. 104 739 HPtech r • • -2- Overlot filling will be performed to elevate the east portion of the site up to the elevation of County Road 100. Material derived from the proposed pond excavation west of the commercial area is planned to be used as structural fill materials within building and pavement areas. If development plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site is mostly occupied by corrals used for equestrian boarding, apparently part of the equestrian district currently located south of the project. Seasonal irrigation ditches are located along the north and east sides of the site. Minor overlot grading consisting mostly of shallow fills was observed in the corral area. The ground surface is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the south. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds outside of the corral area and cottonwood trees adjacent to the Catherine Store property. Eagle Valley Evaporite outcrops are exposed on the hillsides north and south of the project area. The Roaring Fork River is located about I/2 mile south of the project site. GEOLOGIC SETTING Regional geologic mapping shows that formation rock in the project area is the Pennsylvania -age Eagle Valley Evaporite (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). Outcrops are not present on the valley floor in the project area, but outcrops are present on the valley sides to the north and south. The Eagle Valley Evaporite is made up of gray and tan gypsum, anhydrite and halite with interbedded siltstone, claystone, shale, and dolomite. The gypsum, anhydrite and halite are soluble in fresh water. The bedding structure in most places is convoluted because of flow deformation in the plastic gypsum, anhydrite, and halite. Subsurface voids and related sinkholes are sometimes present in areas underlain by the Eagle Valley Evaporite because of the solubility of the gypsum, anhydrite, and halite. Evidence of sinkholes was not observed in the project area. Job No. 104 739 Gtech • • Late Pleistocene -age Roaring Fork River alluvium is present below the project area. The exploratory borings show that the river alluvium extends down to the maximum explored depth of 16 feet. The alluvium generally consists of a stratified deposit of rounded gravel, cobbles and boulders in a silty sand matrix. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 4, 2004. Five exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a track -mounted CME 45 drill rig. The borings were backfilled following drilling as requested by the on-site property manager and slotted PVC pipe could not be installed to monitor groundwater levels as originally proposed. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1 inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about 2 feet of fill (Boring 1 through 4) or 1 foot of topsoil (Boring 5), generally consist of up to 31/2 feet of relatively stiff, sandy silty clay overlying dense gravel alluvium containing cobbles and boulders down to the maximum explored depth of Job No. 104 739 C�leStech • • -4- 16 feet. The fill generally consists of mixed silty sand corral bedding and granular materials. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in Borings 2, 3 and 4 between depths of 6 and 8 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the upper clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate moderate compressibility under conditions of relatively light loading and wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1'/2 inch fraction) of the gravel alluvium are shown on Figures 5 and 6. The laboratory testing is sura narized in Table 1. Free water was encountered in Borings 1 and 5 at depths of 7 and 8 feet at the time of drilling. The subsoils were slightly moist to moist above the groundwater level. GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT Geologic factors that should be considered in project planning and development are the potential for sinkholes and earthquake related ground shaking. The probability of encountering sinkhole related problems throughout the life of the project is considered to be low, but the developer should be aware that the project area cannot be considered totally sinkhole risk free since it is underlain by the Eagle Valley Evaporite. Engineered mitigation that can sometimes be used to mitigate sinkhole related problems include: • Void stabilization by grouting or excavation and backfilling • Deep foundation systems • Structural bridging • Mat foundations or other rigid foundation systems Job No. 104 739 }6&ech EP r • -5- The site could experience moderately strong earthquake related ground shaking. Modified Mercalli Intensity VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable service life for the residences, but the probability for stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. All occupied structures should be designed to withstand moderately strong ground shaking with little or no damage, and not to collapse under stronger ground shaking. The region is in the Uniform Building Code, Seismic Risk Zone 1. Based on our current understanding of the earthquake hazard in this part of Colorado, we see no reason to increase the commonly accepted seismic risk for the area. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the buildings be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular subsoils or compacted structural fill. The recommendations presented below are suitable for planning and preliminary design but site specific studies should be conducted at individual building sites. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the natural granular subsoils or compacted structural fill should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Footings which bear entirely on the natural dense gravel alluvium can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. Job No. 104 739 Gtech • • -6- 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on-site granular soils used as backfill. 5) The existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural granular soils. Suitability of clay soils exposed at design bearing level to support footings should be evaluated at the time of excavation. Structural fill placed below footing bearing levels should be compacted to at least 100% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil and existing fill, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The upper clay soils are compressible and slab distress could occur under loading. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of sand and gravel (such as road base) should be placed beneath interior slabs for subgrade support. This material should consist of minus Job No. 104 739 Gtech • • -7- 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil, debris and oversized rock. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the buildings have been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. POND AND SITE GRADING Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in Borings 4 and 5 drilled in the proposed pond area, it appears that the excavated clay and gravel materials will be suitable for use as fill materials at the project site. Topsoil and oversized rock should be excluded from structural fills. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 7 feet below Job No. 104 739 Gtech IP 410 r -8- the ground surface in Boring 5, but we expect the groundwater level to rise during spring runoff and regional irrigation. The gravel alluvium is permeable and we assume an impervious membrane will be used to line the pond. Pond slopes, both interior and exterior, should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical, or flatter. Fill used to elevate the site should consist of the granular materials devoid of topsoil, vegetation or rock larger than about 8 inches. Prior to placing new fill, the topsoil and any contaminated fill soils (in the corral area) should be removed and the subgrade compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. The depth of clay soils overlying the alluvium at the site is variable which could result in some post -construction differential settlement potential below the buildings. Removal of the clay to expose the gravel alluvium prior to filling should limit potential settlements. Fill placed in non -building areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Fill placement should be monitored and tested for density on a full-time basis to evaluate compliance with the project specifications. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is perforn-ied. If conditions Job No. 104 739 Gtech • r -9- encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the reconunendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on- site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. till*; 1 5 2 2 2 TLK/djb cc: Land Design Partnership ' - iston Job No. 104 739 Gtech EQUESTRIAN DISTRICT APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 100' OPEN SPACE LOT 3 — BORING 3 J ri LOT 2 PROPOSED BUILDINGS (TYPICAL) LOT 1 BORING 2 LOT 5 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY 1 EXISTING 1 CATHERINE STORE PROPERTY COUNTY ROAD 100 1 1 N 0 cn 104 739 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS I Figure 1 I a> La I BORING 1 0 5 10 15 20 17/12 7/12 WC=20.7 DD=106 —200=62 21/6,10/0 +4=49 —200=13 BORING 2 17/12 37/9,10/0 WC=3.7 +4=51 —200=12 BORING 3 COMMERCIAL AREA 8/6,42/6 50/6,10/0 BORING 4 50/4 67/12 WC=3.6 +4=57 —200=13 BORING 5 0 6/12 WC=20.4 DD=107 —200=76 25/6,20/0 5 50/5 +4=58 —200=8 POND AREA Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 10 15 20 Depth — Feet 104 739 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 • LEGEND: FILL; silty sand and sandy gravel with cobbles, overlain by about 6 inches of corral bedding material (silty sand) at Borings 1 and 2. °V; s• 7/12 TOPSOIL; sandy silt and clay, organics, firm, moist, black, Boring 5 only. CLAY (CL); sandy to very sandy, silty, medium stiff to very stiff, moist, brown, low plasticity. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GP—GM); sandy, silty to slightly silty, scattered boulders, dense, slightly moist to wet below groundwater level, brown, round and subround rocks. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch l.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 7 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Free water level in boring at time of drilling. Borings were backfilled following drilling. TPractical drilling refusal on a boulder. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 4, 2004 with 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were not measured and the logs of exploratory borings are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the Togs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 104 739 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I 104 739 • Compression Compression 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 20.7 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Silty Clay Moisture Content = 20.4 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Clay Sample of: Very Sandy From: Boring 1 at 5 Feet Sample of: Sandy Silty From: Boring 5 at 2 Feet No movement No movement upon wetting —'—`'— upon wetting • 0 • • • 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 H EP WORTH — PA WLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Figure 4 Moisture Content = 20.4 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Clay Sample of: Sandy Silty From: Boring 5 at 2 Feet No movement • —'—`'— upon wetting 0 • 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 H EP WORTH — PA WLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Figure 4 24 HR. 7HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 6OMIN. 19MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. /200 #100 U.S. STANDARD SERIES #50 #30 #16 le ►4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/8" 3/4' 1 1/2 3' 5'6- 8' 100 4 1 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.512.5 19.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 49 % LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF: Silty Sand and FINE SAND 38 Gravel 90 80 70 60 37.5 76.2 152 203 127 SAND GRAVEL MEDIUM (COARSE I FINE 1 COARSE SILT AND CLAY 13 % PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Boring 1 at 15 Feet COBBLES HYDROMLItH ANALYSIS If TIME READINGS 24 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60MIN. 191.1IN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. 0 'ERCENT RETAINEI SWIMIRMAnUIIL- SIEVE ANALYSIS STANDARD SERIES #50 #30 #16 #8 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS #200 #100 50 40 30 20 10 0 }4 3/8' 3/4. 1 1/2' 3 5'6' 8.100 CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 51 % LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF: Very Sandy Silty Gravel SAND FINE 104 000 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. H 1 90 80 70 60 9.512.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 MEDIUM I COARSE I FINE 1 COARSE SAND GRAVEL 37 % SILT AND CLAY 12 % PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Boring 3 at 3 Feet GRADATION TEST RESULTS 127 COBBLES 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 5 • RCENT RE A IF wasinnwanumat 24 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 601.119. 19MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. 1200 /100 SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD SERIES _ /16 lB H 3/8. 3/4. 1 1/2' 3 5"6' 8' 100 CLEAR SQU ARE OPENINGS P50 130 001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 57 % LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel 1.18 2.36 4.75 MILLIMETERS SAND FINE I MEDIUM (COARSE SAND HYDROMLILR ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 24 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60MIN. 19MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 -300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS { 1200 30 9.512.5 19.0 GRAVEL FINE 90 37.5 76.2 152 203 127 COARSE SILT AND CLAY 13 % PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Boring 4 at 4 Feet SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD SERIES 1100 /50 130 j16 18 14 COBBLES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/8" 3/4- 1 1/2' 3' S"6' CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 58 % LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sandy Clay SAND FINE SAND MEDIUM 1COARSE { 9.512.5 19.0 FINE GRAVEL 34 % SILT AND CLAY PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Boring 5 at 9 Feet 37.5 COARSE 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 60 76.2 152 203 127 8 % COBBLES 50 40 30 20 10 0 104 739 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 Job No. 104 739 • U _ Z J J < w U_ E" 2 o w w ~ ›- o O Lu O CD w J m O m Q F- J o w = O CC CC O < 2 a 2 w = cn J W Oa Nr H Very sandy silty clay Silty sand and gravel Very sandy silty gravel II Silty sandy gravel II Sandy silty clay Slightly silty sandy gravel II UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) LIQUID LIMIT (%) PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE N VD crl 12 1 t"-- 00 SAND (%) DO m N cn o crl 34 IS LS 00 lin o. ,--4 LOT NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) h o N m m 20.4 SI m d N 0\ M d - A II r 4.08.05 (7) (f) ACCESS (f) Easements showing vested legal access for ingress and egress from a public road to the PUD and/or documentation demonstrating access shall be acquired across a public right-of-way or easement within two (2) years of any PUD approval and said access shall be vested prior to final platting of any property subject to the easement across the right-of-way; (A. 97-109) and The Equestrian Lot has direct access to CR 100 and the proposed four single family lots front on Equestrian Way, a road dedicated by the Aspen Equestrian Estates Final Plat to the public. The attached traffic report, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates and dated August, 2005, shows the minimal impact on CR 100 resulting from the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District. Although no improvements to CR 100 are warranted as a result of the proposed PUD amendment, the Applicant proposes, at the time of the subdivision of the neighborhood commercial zone district (in accordance with the phasing schedule), to construct a south bound acceleration lane from the proposed new access to the neighborhood commercial area. A short deceleration lane will also be constructed beginning at the northeast corner of the Neighborhood Commercial Zone District and ending at the proposed entry to the commercial village. At some point in the future, general traffic growth on CR 100 will require additional channelization as CR 100 approaches Highway 82. The proposed acceleration lane is intended to represent an initial contribution towards these eventually required improvements. TRAFFIC STUDY — Kimley — Horn and Associates, Inc., August 2005 39 T R AFF IC IMP A CT S T UD Y Aspen Equestrian Estates Garfield County, Colorado Prepared for: High Country Engineering 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 950 Seventeenth Street Suite 1050 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 228-2300 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. © August 2005 067871.004 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES LIST OF TABLES i i LIST OF FIGURES i i 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 5 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network 5 3.2 Existing Study Area 7 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes 7 3.4 Unspecified Development Traffic Growth 7 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 11 4.1 Trip Generation 11 4.2 Trip Distribution 12 4.3 Traffic Assignment 12 4.4 Total Background Plus Project Traffic 12 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 17 5.1 Analysis Methodology 17 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis 18 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21 APPENDICES Appendix A - Conceptual Site Plan Appendix B - Intersection Count Sheets Appendix C - CDOT Traffic Information for Highway 82 Appendix D - Trip Generation Worksheets Appendix E - Intersection Analysis Worksheets Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page i LIST OF TABLES Table 1- Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Traffic Generation 12 Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions 17 Table 3 - State Highway 82 (SH-82)/CR 100 LOS Results 18 Table 4 - CR 100/Frontage Road (Catherine Store Driveway) LOS Results 19 Table 5 - CR 100/Proposed Access Driveway LOS Results 20 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1- Vicinity Map 4 Figure 2 - Existing Laneage and Control 6 Figure 3 - Existing Traffic Volumes 8 Figure 4 - 2006 Background Traffic Volumes 9 Figure 5 - 2010 Background Traffic Volumes 10 Figure 6 - Project Trip Distribution 13 Figure 7 - Project Traffic Assignment 14 Figure 8 - 2006 Total Traffic Volumes 15 Figure 9 - 2010 Total Traffic Volumes 16 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page ii 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A commercial development is proposed to be located along the west side of County Road 100 (CR 100), just south of State Highway 82 (SH -82) in Garfield County, Colorado. The development is proposed between the existing Catherine Store, located on the southwest corner of the SH-82/CR 100 intersection, and the Equestrian Center, located further south along the west side of CR 100. The entire project is anticipated to include 20,000 square feet of commercial use space. It is expected that the development would be completed in the year 2006. Analysis was completed for the buildout 2006 short term horizon as well as a 2010 horizon per Garfield County requirements. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. There are two key intersections that have been evaluated in this study. These include the existing intersections of CR 100 & SH -82 and CR 100 & Frontage Road/Catherine Store driveway. Regional access to the development will be provided via SH -82 and CR 100. Direct access to the project is proposed along CR 100 via a single access driveway that is anticipated to allow full turning movements to and from the project. The entire development is expected to generate approximately 15 AM peak hour and 54 PM peak hour driveway vehicle trips. Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the proposed access system for the project. Assignment of the project traffic was based upon the trip generation described previously and the distribution developed. It was found that the proposed project can be accommodated on the existing street network without any proposed improvements at the key intersections. Likewise, this project adds less Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Pagr 1 than 20 percent of traffic on the south leg to SH -82. Therefore, based upon our analysis, we recommend the following: • At the proposed access street intersection along CR 100 Road, stop signs are recommended for installation on the minor approach. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County standards and guidelines, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2003 (MUTCD). Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) has prepared this report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with the proposed Aspen Equestrian Estates commercial development. The project is proposed to be located along the west side of County Road 100 (CR 100), just south of State Highway 82 (SH -82) in Garfield County, Colorado. The vicinity map illustrating the project location is shown in Figure 1. The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, identify potential traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. There are two key intersections that have been evaluated within this study. These include the existing intersections of CR 100 & SH -82 and CR 100 & Frontage Road/ Catherine Store driveway. The project is anticipated to include 20,000 square feet of commercial land use. The development is expected to be completed in the year 2006. Analysis has been completed for the 2006 buildout short term horizon as well as the 2010 horizon for the AM and PM peak hours. The current site plan illustrating the development and access locations is shown in Appendix A. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 3 1 NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES SITE LOCATION FIGURE 1 ❑ and A -Hom and nAssociates. Inc. 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing and Future Roadway Network The proposed project is located along the west side of CR 100, just south of SH -82 in Garfield County, Colorado. In the site vicinity, SH -82 is a category E -X roadway according to the CDOT State Highway Access Category Assignment Schedule. The speed limit along SH -82 approaching the intersection with CR 100 is 55 miles per hour. SH -82 is a divided highway, carrying two lanes of travel in each direction adjacent to the project site. The intersection of SH - 82 with CR 100 is signalized. CR 100 is an undivided two-lane roadway with a 35 mile per hour posted speed limit northbound and 30 mile per hour posted speed limit southbound. The intersection of CR 100 with the Frontage Road currently operates with two-way stop control along the Frontage Road approach. The Frontage Road along the west side of CR 100 aligns with an access driveway for the Catherine Store and adjacent gasoline service station. The speed limit along the Frontage Road is posted at 45 miles per hour eastbound and 35 miles per hour westbound. The existing laneage and control at the intersections is shown in Figure 2. Based upon review of the existing street network, a few observations were identified that may warrant further review by the County. Parking spaces exist along the west side of CR 100, south of SH -82 adjacent to the Catherine Store. It was observed that vehicles backing out of these parking spaces, back onto CR 100 when leaving the store. Likewise, it was observed that vehicles exiting the north driveway of the Catherine Store have a difficult time exiting left. This is due to the close proximity of the northern access driveway to the SH -82/ CR 100 intersection. Again, these observations are provided for informational purposes. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 to 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 el" 1 NORTH NTS 067871.004 1 t ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES EXISTING LANEAGE AND CONTROL • LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection Signalized Intersection Stop Controlled Approach Roadway Speed Limit FIGURE 2 ❑-❑ Kimland Asey Hom1 - . . i. sociates, Inc. 3.2 Existing Study Area The existing site is comprised of an existing equestrian center and horse stables, which are to be partially relocated with the development of the project. The Catherine Store and adjacent gasoline service station exist directly north of the site. To the south and west of the equestrian center, the land use consists of primarily residential areas. Residential areas exist to the south and west of the proposed development and equestrian center. 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the existing study intersections of SH -82 & CR 100 and CR 100 & Frontage Road/ Catherine Store access driveway on Tuesday, December 14, 2004. The weekday counts were conducted during the AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic in 15 -minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. These turning movement counts are shown in Figure 3 with count sheets provided in Appendix B. 3.4 Unspecified Development Traffic Growth The 2006 and 2010 background traffic volumes were obtained by growing the existing peak hour turning movement counts by a 2.1 percent annual growth rate. This growth rate was calculated using the 20 year growth factor of 1.52 as provided on the Colorado Department of Transportation website along SH -82 in the site vicinity (CDOT traffic information provided in Appendix C). Background traffic volumes for the 2006 and 2010 horizon years are shown in Figures 4 and 5. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 7 1 NORTH NTS 067871.004 Tuesday, December 14, 2004 AM Peak 7:45 - 8:45; PM Peak 4:30 - 5:30 COMMERCIAL iCIAL DISTRICT ce ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES EXISTING WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Thursday, October 14, 2004 AM Peak 7:45 - 8:45; PM Peak 5:00 - 6:00 LEGEND • Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 3 l❑" aKnd Associates. Inc...s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES 2006 WEEKDAY BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES f ❑-n and A -Hom and Associates, Inc. O C`] N � CVa .1 24(32) --"/ 4(10) —5 9(25) — 36(27) E— 6(9) �— 25(44) LEGEND • Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 4 NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES 2010 WEEKDAY BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND • Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 5 rima Kimley-Homand Associates, Inc.1—J 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Trip Generation Site -generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates is the Trip Generation Reports published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. For this study, Kimley- Horn used the ITE Trip Generation Report average trip rates that apply to Specialty Retail (ITE Land Use Code 814) for traffic associated with the development, as this land use is expected to be the closest matching use to the proposed project. The ITE Land Use Code 814 - Specialty Retail does not provide rates or equations for this land use for the AM peak hour. Since this land use is believed to be the most accurate representation of the proposed project, the ITE Land Use Code 820 - Shopping Center was used to develop an AM rate for Specialty Retail. It was assumed that the AM and PM peak hour rates for the Specialty Retail land use would be proportional to those for the Shopping Center land use. The rates and equations used are included within Appendix D. In result, the development is expected to generate approximately 15 AM peak hour, 54 PM peak hour, and 886 daily driveway vehicle trips. Since this project is a commercial development, a certain percentage of the trips are expected to be pass -by trips. Pass -by trips are those vehicles already on the street network, passing by the site. Pass -by reductions have not been recognized within this study in order to provide a conservative analysis. 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Seventh Edition, Washington DC, 2003. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield Counhij, CO Page 11 1 'iv 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 1 summarizes the estimated driveway traffic generation for the development. The trip generation worksheets are included in Appendix D. These calculations illustrate the equations used, directional distribution of trips, and number of daily trips. Table 1- Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Traffic Generation 4.2 Trip Distribution Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the proposed access system for the project. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site -generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site in the same direction. Figure 6 illustrates the expected project trip distribution for the site. 4.3 Traffic Assignment Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the distributions to the estimated traffic generation of the development. Traffic assignment is shown in Figure 7. 4.4 Total Background Plus Project Traffic Site traffic volumes were added to the background volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for the short term 2006 and long term 2010 horizon years. Total traffic volumes are illustrated for the 2006 and 2010 horizon years in Figure 8 and 9, respectively. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 12 Size Vehicles Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Specialty Retail 20,000 sq. ft. 9 6 15 24 30 54 4.2 Trip Distribution Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the proposed access system for the project. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site -generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site in the same direction. Figure 6 illustrates the expected project trip distribution for the site. 4.3 Traffic Assignment Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the distributions to the estimated traffic generation of the development. Traffic assignment is shown in Figure 7. 4.4 Total Background Plus Project Traffic Site traffic volumes were added to the background volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for the short term 2006 and long term 2010 horizon years. Total traffic volumes are illustrated for the 2006 and 2010 horizon years in Figure 8 and 9, respectively. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 12 1 NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (95%) -' (5%) --y LEGEND • Study Area Key Intersection XX%(XX%) Entering (Exiting) Trip Distribution FIGURE 6 It ❑m❑ andA socia1-i and Associates, Inc. NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT c) N /Id7 , 6(28) 0(2) LEGEND • Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 7 1 ❑. r1 Knd As Hornsociates. Inc. fi and As NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES 2006 WEEKDAY BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6(28) — 0(2) 71 LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 8 ❑mn Kimley-Homand Associates. Inc. NORTH NTS 067871.004 ASPEN EQUESTRIAN ESTATES 2010 WEEKDAY BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ROMP rn r O N N N � R C � l y 39(29) 6(9) 28(52) 24(32)--"1 4(10) —3 9(25) — Iif N r N N V N r N O 1- M r 6(28) — 0(2) — T N LEGEND • Study Area Key Intersection XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes FIGURE 9 ❑imil :T= Hom and Associates, Inc. • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Kimley-Horn's analysis of traffic operations in the site vicinity was conducted to determine potential capacity deficiencies in the 2006 and 2010 development horizons at the identified key intersections. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual2. 5.1 Analysis Methodology Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, Kimley-Horn recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations. Table 2 shows the definition of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Signalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec/veh) Unsignalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <_10 <_10 B >10 and 5 20 >l0 and <_ 15 C >20 and <_ 35 >15 and 25 D >35and <_55 >25and <_35 E >55 and <_ 80 >35 and <_ 50 F >80 >50 Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Study area intersections were analyzed based on average total delay analysis for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a 2 Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Washington DC, 2000. Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 17 1 1e) 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 :op 1 two-way stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop -controlled intersection is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Level of service for a signalized and four-way stop controlled intersection is defined for each approach and for the intersection. 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the level of service at the key intersections identified for study are provided in Appendix E and grouped by individual intersection. The analysis is based on the lane geometry and intersection control shown in Figure 2. State Highway 82 (SH-82)/CR 100 This signalized intersection was found to operate at LOS B and C for existing AM and PM peak hours, respectively. In 2006, this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS B and C during the AM and PM peak hours, with and without the addition of project traffic. In 2010, this intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during the AM peak hour and LOS C during the PM peak hour prior to the addition of project traffic. With addition of project traffic, the intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C during both peak hours. Table 3 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. Table 3 - State Highway 82 (SH-82)/CR 100 LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Existing 17.4 B 21.5 C 2006 Background 18.7 B 24.6 C 2006 Total 19.1 B 25.8 C 2010 Background 19.8 B 26.6 C 2010 Total 20.2 C 28.5 C Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 18 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 CR 100/Frontage Road (Catherine Store Driveway) All movements at this existing two-way stop controlled intersection currently operate with acceptable level of service during both AM and PM peak hours. All movements at this intersection are anticipated to continue to operate acceptably with and without the additional of project traffic throughout the 2010 horizon year. Table 4 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. Table 4 - CR 100/Frontage Road (Catherine Store Driveway) LOS Results Scenario Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Existing Northbound Approach 7.4 A 8.0 A Southbound Approach 7.6 A 7.7 A Westbound Approach 10.7 B 14.2 B Eastbound Approach 11.4 B 13.8 B 2006 Background Northbound Approach 7.5 A 8.0 A Southbound Approach 7.7 A 7.7 A Westbound Approach 10.9 B 14.5 B Eastbound Approach 11.7 B 14.0 B 2006 Total Northbound Approach 7.5 A 8.0 A Southbound Approach 7.7 A 7.8 A Westbound Approach 11.0 B 15.7 C Eastbound Approach 11.9 B 14.8 B 2010 Background Northbound Approach 7.5 A 8.1 A Southbound Approach 7.7 A 7.7 A Westbound Approach 11.2 B 16.2 C Eastbound Approach 12.0 B 15.5 C 2010 Total Northbound Approach 7.5 A 8.1 A Southbound Approach 7.7 A 7.8 A Westbound Approach 11.3 B 17.5 C Eastbound Approach 12.2 B 16.4 C Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 19 1 111 1 1 1 kir 1 1 1 1 1 1 1eb 1 CR 100/Proposed Access Driveway All movements at this proposed two-way stop controlled intersection providing access to the project are expected to operate with acceptable level of service during both AM and PM peak hours throughout the 2010 long term horizon year. Table 5 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. Table 5 - CR 100/Proposed Access Driveway LOS Results Scenario Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2006 Total Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach 7.5 10.7 A B 8.1 13.7 A B 2010 Total Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach 7.6 10.9 A B 8.2 14.4 A C KimIey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 20 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It was found that the proposed project can be accommodated on the existing street network without any proposed improvements at the key intersections. Likewise, this project adds less than 20 percent of traffic on the south leg to SH -82. Therefore, based upon our analysis, we recommend the following: • At the proposed access street intersection along CR 100 Road, stop signs are recommended for installation on the minor approach. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County standards and guidelines, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2003 (MUTCD). Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO Page 21 APPENDICES Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO APPENDIX A Conceptual Site Plan Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/ Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO 1 :\SDSKPRO3\204\1030\dIT-KH-TRAFFIC.dwg, 11/30/200412:17:56 PM, Adobe PDF 11113 • M%9 CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 OR 534-06700 IN METRO DENVEF CALL 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANC BEFORE YOU DIG. GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UfILITIE' Iv O A 4) 0 (11 O oO -0 In H Z ° ASPEN EQUESTRIAN GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ASPEN EQUESTRIAN EXHIBIT LAYOUT 1, c°114, r`�'PL — HOE — m �.O�• �Y '� c�NE-E.ft % HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 9452555 WWW.HCENG.COM DRAWNBY. NO. DATE REVISION BY cRec�c°e.. DATE FILE CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 OR 534-06700 IN METRO DENVEF CALL 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANC BEFORE YOU DIG. GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UfILITIE' APPENDIX B Intersection Count Sheets Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO is) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1M 1 1 1 1 1 1 O @ I H O H .0 a N L tT 0 O N J 0 C 0 co 0 W D▪ I m 0 O O J 0 C 0 L L_ 0 CO m O G) J ZT O H O J a) H 0) 0 S (0 C6 N a N CO CO o) Ln 0▪ ) (00)0)0)0) CO CO CO CO Lo O) N LO Lo Ln CO r r O N- rM V' V' 7 d' V' V' V' N7 0 CO O N r 0) 7 LO co00)) 000 rO N M) 0 OCO CO CO N .- O r N LO Lf) CO N 0 N NMNNN '1' N CO 0 (0 N r CO 0) N- CO M CO '7 CO N- (A CO 00 LO CO N 10 ▪ LO M 1- C") - M 0 0V co r to ✓ N V' 00 CO M Lo ▪ V -M V -N V MM • C N 01 0 V' N 01 0 rn r co V' CO Lo (0 00 0) M N LO t -- CD CO V N ((0 • N 00 0 LO CO CO CO N N 00 0 CO CO 4- N < < < < < < < < @ S < O0-MAtO - H coto 0� .6'Cr rN N- 66 0)0) ar 0 S (0 co O 0- N V 0 CO r -- N- r CO CO CO CO CO N CO CO M O N N N N N _ 1—• TO CO r CO CO N (O 0 04 MN (0 CO Lo N Q) F, Ln to to Lo CO (O V Lo L ca co rco• _ E ° co0o in to to co L CD O 0 0 N A- 10 0 Ln CO 0 ▪ 0 Lco co co co co co co N M 0 N F- t a) to Nr0N0 J V M Ln CO CO CO V' r V' • N 'D 0 0 .0 0) CO W 0)cs.1 0o co 4 • co L j) 0 0 LO N r V• r 0 N L 1— 17 0 C 0 O 4 L O 0 LO r CO r M r CO CO co • N CO .0 m▪ LC) CO V'r 0tn0 'ct N L 0) p V 0) co to V CO CO CO L J CO OCl V V' Lo M Lo 0 0 0 O 0 L O Z Lo Ln 7 1' 0) (O CO CO �e-N N N L 0) ptoNrMCO C3 L H O OO .M- A N J r N - CO CO A- M CO LO - N 0 O Lo 0 iz 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ T13=a "0 10 0 Ln 0 10 0 Lo O Y 0 O CO O CO 't H CO CO 7 O 2 0 (0 f- 0 C 7 0 d (0 0) L 0) L m O L 1- 0) J L 0) L 0) 7 0 L 0) J C 0 L 7 0 U) L O) L 0) O L H N -J 7 7 0O Z L 0) L 0) O L a) J a) E co 0 O 2 (0 0) Q) d COM00)) V 7 0 v co co V V- V `-M CI' OO O) 00 r r 000 0 CO 4- co (0 (0 co LO In CO 0 . N c- N t- O CO (O N c- (n co 00 (O M M c -NN V'MON 0) 0 0 0 CO 0 0 V CO r CO 60 (O CO (O N N A- 0 A- (0 0 (0 0) 0 0) 01 0) (V 0) CO N N N " r co N O) (n (n r 0o 4— r v 4- V' CO 0) 00 ct N r V N N ct M ct NCV CO 'Cr N O r N 'V (f) t - V N 0) V CO CO 0 co c0 c LO N CO N Lo o O,- o 4- 00 co o v 1- co V r: (: rZ-: r Oci ao Ca ao (z..: 0)coO0M O r CO "ZrL0 CO r 0 11- 740 Peak Hour (0 O) r co co O) N CO O Lo N CO (O (O N O r 000) CO V 0 U) CO 0 6) L 0) pCO 0 7 N (n .- .- N0) L 1- N(0 (f)M r' 0)CO co C' 7 7 0 17)a 03 W N- (O O CO (n (O t N Q' L p-0 -0 d'. -MN O .0 1- C 0 L L_ 0 O 0) (arm(nCsiCOr rNi L 01 N M N (O r co (O (h NO L O) CO r CO r CO 7 M CO O U)M(n rr(O co (f7 co F- JN 0 0 (O 0 CO CO MCO LCO CD Q) r c- (n O) N U) d' (O L m 00 N co co co O (O 0) N O 2 N c- CO CO ct <t .1' N H N N N 60 (n (O (O M (V J N N 7 iL-n.aaaaaaa �o 1 C N 00 (f) oV 0� oa hO (000 co� vv(ri(iiiri(ri o6 le 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 1 7 0 1— O N L O) L 0) 7 O L 1- O J L 0) L 0) 0 O L 1- 0) m J L 0) L 0) O L 1- 0) O J a c ID O Z L 0) L 0) 0 O L H -J a) E 0, CF C r O � N M N (D r N (D N (0 (0 co co co N 7 0 0 0 O N N N M V 7 (0 COOO r N 7 0 r M r T- C, O r N r N O O 7- 7r 7' CO (0 (0 O) (O N (n ✓ N r r O N r r (0 O N- CD N- N CD ✓ N N M M to co O co N U) (O - N 0) CO N. (1') • N CD 7 O CO O CO O (0 a) N ^ CO M CO r 7CD CO r 7 10 co N.- 0) CO 0) 00 (O 00 CO 7 co 7 M co co N N CO r CO r CO 7 CO 7 O CO CO N N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q To Q o O COV O cam- 01 V 0 ((0 01 ed eo (b co a O 2 a) a U7 U0 LO CD 00 71" O (0 = f- (0 OM In M N -LO 7 ON) co (O co L 0)O (0 CD 7 00 0) (D L 0) 0 N O 00 st L 1- JOD V (0 O) O0 M O) U0 M CD,- (!) f- co CA co (0 CD 00 � N L 0) 0 0 0 0 N M M'f N OO L 1- 15 N (O (n 7 Or M n r J L O) r (O (!7 r (() N- EE E L 0) O to L 1- N O) 7' O (0 O N (O (0 (D (0 V at a) (0 M CD (O M (D r M J L 0)h O 7 M (O 10 V N L 0) = CO 0 (0 O) V (!) (0 CO 2 co N N N 't N M N L 1 - at at J M N (0 (0 CD M 7 M (D N N CV (0 N CV M NO CO M M O CO CV N 7- 0 00 M Faaaaaaaa 75 =a ...... OUPO(DOUPO(0 0 YO m 0 M 7 0 M 7 I-- CLS M (n 4 4 4 t ((i i0i 610 a 4 O W F CC W O0 ' Z Z Q W Z Z E W W Y 2 O I— Q Q m U O 0 O O N N LO 0 O 0 N O O LO O N O O O O 0 W 0 O N V CO CO CO 0 0 M M 0 aa N 0, m O N CO 0 O O 0 co 0 CO N .a• N (7 0 0 LO O CO 0 N 0 N 0 (`7 0, 0 co M CO N N N r) N M N N 0 0 M (0 0) 0 N O N r— (‚4 N. N M rn 0, O o (n M 71- c.c.; � (0 (0 N 0 o 0 n m O 0) M 0 06 06 O 0 W W z z 0 u_ LL O O N O O 7 N O 0) d 0 CO 0) O M ti V (0) m O Lo O N O 0 N 0) (`) V N O N V 0) (0 a 0) r co 0 O N CO t0 (0) 7 (o N O (•) (+) CO CO O O CO (0 7 O m O N 0) 7 O O V (0 m O M O N N O M O N 00 N m N V V LO N co CO co N LO O 00 O 7 O O N O L N V O O ' O O N O d N V 0 V C) O 0 'V O CO V 0 O (f) (0 0 O O u) O O M O p W H W OH U I- Z uJ W H Z Z W W Y = U H Q m O O O N O 0 O O CO 0 0 O O O 0 O CO N N C) O N N N O O O CO O O 03 N N N 0 N N C) N O N V m O CO O N N r O CO N O O CO N O CO O CO 03 O 0) CO CO O O N N O O O O C) N N C) n C) 04 C) CO N C) N co 0) C C) N V r N V N N N C) N O m v 04 v v d N O O O 04 O CO C) O C) C) N N N C) N 0 O 60 O 0 .66 to V 0) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w W 0 U U) Z W — Z Z WH Y = Q Q CO cc N 0 N O .V' N to c- .- N C) 0 C) 0 0 N- 0 0 N 0 r O) 0 N- r CO 0 0 L 0 O 7 co (» o 0 o V C) N C) O CO 7 N V CO N 0) 0- M 1f) c() V r.. r C) ,- N N ,- 0 0 (D cD C) 0) C) CO V N 0) (() (D (D C) 00 h- N 0) N CO CO V d' CO 0) CO (O Cr) 0- .1- 'V 'V 0) V CO (n CO N N- d' N O) (D VD CO N C) N N N (D N O 0) co 0 (o (D '7 O) (0 N V co N Q) N N '7 V I- ,- (D O) N (D V (0 Y CO v 0 v (n m m r (n C) r- N- (o r . - (o V0) CO (D `3 0) ui ((0 (i (d (D (0 le 1 1 1 1 1 1 cD V V (0 a co V co oO co r- N v- N N 0 V N- 0 N V V 1 car, 1 truck CO CD CO 7 car, 1 truck O) .- N s- 23 car, 1 truck 14 car, 1 truck 12 car, 1 truck 8 car, 1 truck (N O COo 279/12 N m N NZZ M N 238/10 co N O N 227/22 CO 0 CO N 6 car, 1 truck 2 car, 1 truck 00 C.- �M 4%4121 2 car, 1 truck CO V CO r 0) CO 7 car, 1 truck in (n CO 1 car, 1 truck (n u) CO '- v' o m v CO r- in M N 0 CO M N V T- (n N V r7: -O — f- CO c- Q) (() M N N co V ,- ,-W.- r (O co O) 1— N 1 M m c -O (0.... R (j 0.7 N h (O U) V Imo- ) co O O 0:) N V ! 0) 0 O O M co to (4) V (0 O M 0 0 6 V) V' Trucks include concrete trucks, box trucks, semi -trucks, and buses. First Number is passenger cars, second number is trucks. N 12 cars, 2 truck CO co co n) M O a) co N N r 0) CO U 7 et 0) co 0) O 0 N O N 0) 0 N N N O )n CO M M co 10 cars, 1 truck CO (D m M M M CO m 2 car, 1 truck 0 r w co Lc" 0) (C) tD N 0 co 0) N M_ M a) co M v N CO N m m a 0)) O Trucks include concrete trucks, box trucks, semi -trucks, and buses. First Number is passenger cars, second number is trucks. APPENDIX C CDOT Traffic Information for SH -82 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO 1 End Route . Ref Ref Pomt Point Traffic Information for Highway 0 From RefPoint 10 To RefPoint 20 Annual Start Point Average AADT AADT Description Daily Year Derivation Traffic I 082A 11.699 13.553 ON SH 82 0 3 MI E/O 16,256 2003 SH 133 082A 13.553 19.068 ON SH 82 W/O CR 17,548 2003 1 13, EL JEBEL 082A 19.068 20.954 ON SH 82 NW/O SH 18,669 2003 82 BASALT BUS RT, CR 3 ilAve rrotal 17,491 Actual Factor Factor AADT Single Trucks AADT Comb. Trucks 594 216 Design . Daily 20 Hour Percent Vehicle Year Vol Trucks Miles Factor (% of Traveled AADT) 5.00% 1.60 11 29,716 571 208 4.40% 1.52 11 95,286 448 164 3.30% 1.56 11 36,106 161,107 APPENDIX D Trip Generation Kimnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO -1=1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Project Aspen Equestrian Subject Trip Generation Designed by EAG Checked by Date December 10, 2004 Job No. 067871004 Date Sheet No. 2 of 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual7th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Specialty Retail Center (814) Independant Variable - 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area (X) X = 20.000 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. *rates are not provided for AM peak hour for this land use, so rate was developed by comparison of AM rate to PM rate for shopping center and this proportion (AM peak hour rate/PM peak hour rate) was applied to the specialty retail land use (directional distribution for AM peak hour from shoppping center was used) AM Rate for ITE 820 _ AM Rate for ITE 814 PM Rate for ITE 820 PM Rate for ITE 814 AM Rate for ITE = (1.03*2.71)/3.75 = 0.74 (T) = 0.74 (X) (T) = 0.74 * (20.0) therefore 1.03 = AM Rate for ITE 815 3.75 2.71 Directional Distribution: 61% ent. 39% exit. T = 15 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 9 entering 6 exiting 9 + 6 = 15 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (page 1339) (T) = 2.71 (X) (T) = 2.71 * (20.0) Weekday (page 1338) Daily Weekday (T) = 44.32 (X) (T) = 44.32 * Directional Distribution: 44% ent. 56% exit. T = 54 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 24 entering 30 exiting 24 + 30 = 54 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T = 886 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (20.0) 443 entering 443 exiting 443 + 443 = 886 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX E Intersection Analysis Worksheets Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067871.004/Aspen Equestrian Estates, Garfield County, CO 000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 1 Version 4.1e SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information IAnalyst lillincy ITime EAG or Co. Kimley-Horn Performed 12/15/2004 Period AM Existing Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2004 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB ILT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ILane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 20 981 67 75 417 67 24 8 154 25 26 27 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H F a90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 IP Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IPed/Bike/RTOR Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N IParking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 sing Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 62.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 L ne group Capacity Control Delay;°and LOS Determination , n .` :. ,. EB WB NB SB IAdj. flow rate 22 1090 74 83 463 74 207 87 Lane group cap. 126 2243 1001 126 2243 1001 323 303 Iv/c ratio 0.17 0 • 0.07 0.66 0.21 0.07 0.64 0.29 Green ratio 0.07 0 • 0.62 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.20 0.20 I Unif. delay di 43.8 10.3 7.6 45.3 8.3 7.6 36.7 33.9 II Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 3.0 0.8 0.1 23.9 0.2 0.1 9.4 2.4 IPF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 46.8 11.1 7.7 69.2 8.5 7.7 46.1 36.3 ILane group LOS D B A E A A D D Apprch. delay 11 5 16.5 46.1 36.3 LOS B B D D IApproach I tersec. delay 17.4 Intersection LOS B 000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 1 Version 4.1e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst EAG ncy or Co. Kimley-Horn Performed 12/15/2004 Time Period PM Existing Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2004 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 25 502 38 260 1308 31 55 23 83 17 18 20 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Dosing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= 370 G= G= 24.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity,' Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 28 558 42 289 1453 34 179 61 Lane group cap. 90 1339 598 505 2171 969 374 389 v/c ratio 0.31 0.42 0.07 0.57 0.67 0.04 0.48 0.16 Green ratio 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.28 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.24 Unif. delay di 45.8 23.5 20.4 30.9 13.4 8.2 32.6 30.0 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 8.8 1.0 0.2 4.7 1.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 54.6 24.4 20.6 35.5 15.0 8.2 37.0 30.9 Lane group LOS D C C D B A D C Apprch. delay 25.5 18.2 37.0 30.9 Approach LOS C B D C Intersec. delay 21.5 Intersection LOS C 1 000TM 1 Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHORT REPORT 'v/c 'Approach General Information Site Information Analyst EAG ncy or Co. Kimley Horn Performed 12/15/2004 Time Period AM Background Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 21 1022 70 78 434 70 28 9 180 26 27 28 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 "sing Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 62.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 ycle Length C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay; and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 23 1136 78 87 482 78 241 90 Lane group cap. 126 2243 1001 126 2243 1001 322 284 ratio 0.18 0.51 0.08 0.69 0.21 0.08 0.75 0.32 Green ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.20 0.20 Unif. delay di 43.8 10.5 7.6 45.4 8.3 7.6 37.6 34.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 3.2 0.8 0.2 26.7 0.2 0.2 14.7 2.9 IPF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 47.0 11.3 7.7 72.2 8.5 7.7 52.4 37.1 Lane group LOS D B A E A A D D 1 Apprch. delay 11.8 17.0 52.4 37.1 LOS B B D D delay 18.7 Intersection LOS 8 Intersec. 1 000TM 1 Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved ersion 4.le 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst EAG ncy or Co. Kimley Horn Performed 12/15/2004 ime Period PM Background Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 26 523 45 308 1363 32 90 38 136 18 22 21 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 IllSsing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 !ming G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= 370 G= G= 24.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 p C2tpa+city,Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 29 581 50 342 1514 36 293 67 Lane group cap. 90 1339 598 505 2171 969 370 379 v/c ratio 0.32 0.43 0.08 0.68 0.70 0.04 0.79 0.18 Green ratio 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.28 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.24 Unif. delay di 45.9 23.6 20.5 32.0 13.8 8.2 35.7 30.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 9.2 1.0 0.3 7.1 1.9 0.1 15.8 1.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 55.1 24.7 20.8 39.1 15.6 8.3 51.5 31.2 Lane group LOS E C C D B A D C Apprch. delay 25.7 19.7 51.5 31.2 Approach LOS C B D C Intersec. delay 24.6 Intersection LOS C 00TM 1 Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst EAG ncy or Co. Kimley-Horn Performed 12/15/2004 Ime Period AM Total Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 21 1022 74 81 434 70 30 10 182 26 27 28 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Psing G= 7.0 G= 62.0 G= G= G= 20.0 G= G= Ging Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 Lanp,Group Capacity,-Control;Delay, anld �y � , 1S Determina l n ,.... �.� f� � -: £., WB NB SB EB Adj. flow rate 23 1136 82 90 482 78 246 90 Lane group cap. 126 2243 1001 126 2243 1001 321 282 v/c ratio 0.18 0.51 0.08 0.71 0.21 0.08 0.77 0.32 Green ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.20 0.20 Unif. delay di 43.8 10.5 7.6 45.5 8.3 7.6 37.8 34.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 3.2 0.8 0.2 29.1 0.2 0.2 16.0 3.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 47.0 11.3 7.8 74.6 8.5 7.7 53.8 37.1 Lane group LOS D B A E A A D D Apprch. delay 11.8 17.6 53.8 37.1 Approach LOS B B D D Intersec. delay 19.1 Intersection LOS 8 •000TH 1 Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHORT REPORT General information Site Information Analyst EAG igincy or Co. Kimley-Horn Performed 12/15/2004 lme Period PM Total Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Volum ad'iming Input' .. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 26 523 55 316 1363 32 102 40 146 18 23 21 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) p p P p p p P p P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 sing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Iming G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= 370 G= G= 24.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 eisrou C aci Control Delay, anld LOS Determinaticirty��� NB ..,. SB EB WB Adj. flow rate 29 581 61 351 1514 36 319 69 Lane group cap. 90 1339 598 505 2171 969 368 376 v/c ratio 0.32 0.43 0.10 0.70 0.70 0.04 0.87 0.18 Green ratio 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.28 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.24 Unif. delay di 45.9 23.6 20.6 32.2 13.8 8.2 36.5 30.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 9.2 1.0 0.3 7.7 1.9 0.1 23.0 1.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 55.1 24.7 21.0 39.9 15.6 8.3 59.5 31.3 Lane group LOS E C C D B A E C Apprch. delay 25.6 20.0 59.5 31.3 Approach LOS C B E C Intersec. delay 25.8 Intersection LOS C TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1gib 1 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information'.; :"' Site Information Analyst EAG Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Time Period AM Background Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Volume anlTimingInput EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 23 1110 76 85 472 76 30 10 196 28 29 30 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 7.0 G= 61.0 G= G= G= 21.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control belay, nd � Y '�.i �'�A and LOS Determination , ..'. EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 26 1233 84 94 524 84 262 96 Lane group cap. 126 2207 985 126 2207 985 338 292 v/c ratio 0.21 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.24 0.09 0.78 0.33 Green ratio 0.07 0.61 0.61 0.07 0.61 0.61 0.21 0.21 Unif. delay di 43.9 11.5 8.0 45.6 8.9 8.0 37.3 33.5 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 3.7 1.0 0.2 32.6 0.3 0.2 15.9 3.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 47.6 12.6 8.2 78.3 9.1 8.2 53.1 36.5 Lane group LOS D B A E A A D D Apprch. delay 13.0 18.3 53.1 36.5 Approach LOS B B D D Intersec. delay 19.8 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e f:lo•//(`•�Tlnn„mPntc°/7(lonri°/7(1Catttnoc\rnrttc rnwe\T.nral°/7nsettine \Temp\.c7k/6A tmn R/R/7005 le 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst EAG Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Time Period PM Background Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 °Volume,andTiming Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 28 568 49 335 1481 35 98 41 148 20 24 23 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= 37.0 G= G= 24.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 .ane roup Capacity, Control _Delay, end LOS Determtnatiofn, EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 31 631 54 372 1646 39 319 75 Lane group cap. 90 1339 598 505 2171 969 369 370 v/c ratio 0.34 0.47 0.09 0.74 0.76 0.04 0.86 0.20 Green ratio 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.28 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.24 Unif. delay d1 45.9 24.0 20.5 32.7 14.7 8.2 36.4 30.4 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 10.2 1.2 0.3 9.2 2.5 0.1 22.7 1.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 56.1 25.2 20.8 41.9 17.2 8.3 59.1 31.6 Lane group LOS E C C D B A E C Apprch. delay 26.2 21.5 59.1 31.6 Approach LOS C C E C Intersec. delay 26.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000T M Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e r1...I/r .\ nn110�711CP4t1„rre\TPni„\e')lr'2752 tnir R/R/78(15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information .... .. .. Site Information Analyst EAG Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Time Period AM Total Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Volume, and Timing' input ... EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 23 1110 80 88 472 76 32 11 198 28 29 30 Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startu. lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left Thru & RT 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 8.0 G= 59.0 G= G= G= 22.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 Lane Croup Capacity;'Control Dey,zand LOS, Deterrnination�,`, .., EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 26 1233 89 98 524 84 268 96 Lane group cap. 144 2135 953 144 2135 953 353 312 v/c ratio 0.18 0.58 0.09 0.68 0.25 0.09 0.76 0.31 Green ratio 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.22 0.22 Unif. delay di 42.9 12.7 8.9 44.8 9.8 8.9 36.5 32.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 2.7 1.1 0.2 23.0 0.3 0.2 14.2 2.5 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 45.7 13.9 9.1 67.7 10.1 9.0 50.7 35.2 Lane group LOS D B A E B A D D Apprch. delay 14.2 18.0 50.7 35.2 Approach LOS B B D D Intersec. delay 20.2 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le c')1,11ZA 2/Q/7nnc le 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information ' Site Information Analyst EAG Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Time Period PM Total Intersection SH-82/CR 100 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Votume.and TimingInput -' s .F. . SB EB WB NB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L T R L T R LTR LTR Volume (vph) 28 568 59 343 1481 35 110 43 158 20 25 23 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= 37.0 G= G= 24.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 Lake Group Gapaci ; Control ela an LDSDeterminatia EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 31 631 66 381 1646 39 346 76 Lane group cap. 90 1339 598 505 2171 969 366 366 v/c ratio 0.34 0.47 0.11 0.75 0.76 0.04 0.95 0.21 Green ratio 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.28 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.24 Unif. delay di 45.9 24.0 20.7 32.9 14.7 8.2 37.4 30.4 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 10.2 1.2 0.4 10.0 2.5 0.1 35.1 1.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 56.1 25.2 21.1 42.9 17.2 8.3 72.4 31.7 Lane group LOS E C C D B A E C Apprch. delay 26.2 21.8 72.4 31.7 Approach LOS C C E C Intersec. delay 28.5 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright Chi 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e TYIP'III '\1 I! rrti?l PvfcO/:/(19Y1110� /I ICP1tirirrc\(`11Yt1v rrvuurAT nral0/7(1Cettinac\TPn,n\c7ki7R tmn R/R/70n5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst EAG cy/Co. Kimley-Horn e Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Intersection Frontage Road/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2004 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 151 27 42 108 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 151 27 42 108 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized ( 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 24 6 35 24 4 9 k -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 urly Flow Rate, HFR 24 6 35 24 4 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service', Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 11 42 65 37 C (m) (vph) 1499 1410 697 599 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.06 95% queue length 0.02 0.09 0.31 0.20 Control Delay 7.4 7.6 10.7 11.4 LOS A A B B Approach Delay -- -- 10.7 11.4 Approach LOS -- -- B B � Its Reserved CS2 000TM Version 4.1d 1 Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information " Analyst EAG NE ncy/Co. Kimley-Horn Irre Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Intersection Frontage Road/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2004 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 197 16 23 318 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 197 16 23 318 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 42 9 26 32 10 25 Factor, PHF1.001.001.001.001.001.00 IPEk-Hour rly Flow Rate, HFR 42 9 26 32 10 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,;Queue Length, and Level of Service ";°;..... ::;,..x.,..:' ., _, . u..., :'f..., Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 22 23 77 67 C(m)(vph) 1241 1369 470 476 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.14 95% queue length 0.05 0.05 0.58 0.49 Control Delay 8.0 7.7 14.2 13.8 LOS A A 8 B Approach Delay -- -- 14.2 13.8 Approach LOS -- -- B B ts Reserved 2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' General;Information enalyst ncy/Co. 'e Performed Analysis Time Period Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road Intersection Orientation: North-South EAG Kimley-Horn 12/15/2004 AM EBackground i 1 1 1 1 1 Site Information Frontage Road/CR 100 CDOT 2006 North/South Street: CR 100 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 tohi+cle,Volurnes and Adjustnien Major Street Movement Northbound Southbound Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type 3 RT Channelized Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement L 11 1.00 11 0 T R 157 29 1.00 1.00 L 44 1.00 T 127 1.00 R 4 1.00 157 29 44 127 4 0 Undivided 0 0 0 1 0 LTR 0 LTR 1 0 0 1 Westbound Eastbound Volume k111111 -Hour Factor, PHF rly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 25 6 36 24 4 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 1.00 25 0 1.00 6 0 1.00 36 0 0 N 1.00 24 0 1.00 1.00 4 9 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 Lanes Configuration 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Dejay;`;Queue Approach Movement Length, and Level'of Service, NB SB 1 4 Westbound 7 8 Eastbound 9 10 Lane Configuration LTR v (vph) 11 C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length 1475 0.01 0.02 Control Delay LOS Approach Delay 7.5 A LTR 44 1401 0.03 0.10 7.7 A LTR 67 675 0.10 0.33 10.9 Approach LOS is Reserved '2000T M Version 4.1d B 11 LTR 37 572 0.06 0.21 11.7 8 12 10.9 8 Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 11.7 8 Version 4.1d Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst EAG ncy/Co. Kimley-Horn e Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Background Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Frontage Road/CR 100 CDOT 2006 North/South Street: CR 100 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes'and Adjustments Major Street Movement Northbound Southbound 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 205 18 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 205 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes Configuration 0 24 1.00 24 0 331 20 1.00 331 20 Undivided 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Movement Volume k -Hour Factor, PHF Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 L T R 44 9 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 L 32 1.00 11 T 10 1.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 urly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 44 9 27 32 10 0 0 0 0 0 12 R 25 1.00 25 0 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized Lanes Configuration 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delayy's.Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration v (vph) C (m) (vph) LTR 22 1231 LTR 24 1358 v/c 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.05 0.05 Westbound 7 8 LTR 80 459 0.17 0.63 9 Eastbound 10 11 LTR 12 67 467 0.14 0.50 Control Delay 8.0 7.7 LOS Approach Delay A Approach LOS A 14.5 8 14.5 14.0 8 8 14.0 8 000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst EAG ncy/Co. Kimley-Horn e Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period AM Total Intersection Frontage Road/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 162 30 44 134 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 162 30 44 134 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 I 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 26 6 36 24 4 9 k-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IlrurlyFlow Rate, HFR 26 6 36 24 4 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 11 44 68 37 C (m) (vph) 1467 1394 663 561 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.07 95% queue length 0.02 0.10 0.34 0.21 Control Delay 7.5 7.7 11.0 11.9 LOS A A B B Approach Delay -- -- 11.0 11.9 Approach LOS -- -- 8 B S2000TM Reserved S2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. Id Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General. Information nalyst EAG ncy/Co. Kimley-Horn e Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Total Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road Site Information Intersection Frontage Road/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Intersection Orientation: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment: Major Street Movement North/South Street: CR 100 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Northbound Southbound Volume 2 3 4 L T R 22 229 22 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 229 22 L 24 1.00 24 5 T 350 1.00 350 6 R 20 1.00 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized 0 -- 0 Undivided 0 0 Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal 0 1 0 LTR 0 LTR 1 0 Minor Street Movement Volume 0 Westbound 7 8 9 1 Eastbound 10 11 L T R L T 48 9 27 32 10 k -Hour Factor, PHF rly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 1.00 48 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 27 32 10 0 0 N 0 12 R 25 1.00 25 0 0 N 0 0 Lanes Configuration 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay; 2Queue Length, ani Approach Movement Lane Configuration v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c evel:of>Sennce, NB SB 1 LTR 22 1209 4 Westbound 7 8 9 Eastbound 10 11 12 LTR LTR LTR 24 84 67 1326 420 434 0.02 95% queue length Control Delay 0.06 8.0 0.02 0.06 7.8 0.20 0.15 0.74 0.54 15.7 14.8 LOS A A Approach Delay Approach LOS 00TM C 15.7 C B 14.8 Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, Alt Rights Reserved Version 4.1d le 1 1 1 1 1 1110 1 1 1 1 i 1• 1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY enera Information Site Information Analyst EAG Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period AM Background Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Frontage Road/CR 100 CDOT 2010 Pro•ect Descri.tion 067871004 -As.en E.uestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 e hlce Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Movement Northbound Southbound 5 Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type 1.00 171 29 1.00 29 1.00 44 1.00 4 1.00 4 RT Channelized Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement Volume Westbound Undivided 0 LTR 10 Eastbound Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes Configuration 39 1.00 39 LTR Approach NB Movement Lane Configuration v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c Westbound Eastbound 8 LTR 72 657 12 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0.01 0.02 7.5 0.10 7.7 0.11 0.37 A A 0.07 0.22 12.0 B 12.0 B Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id fila•//CATlnrnmantc0/,? lanrl°/7(l.Cettinac\rnrtic rnwe\T .oral°/90Settincrc\Tema\n2k17F, tmn 8/R/2005 le 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d f;1P•//(`•\rinrt,mantc0/-')(lanr10/i(Kettinoc\rnrtic rnwe\T.nasal%7tl.Settinoc\Temn\tt7k17P tmn 8/R/2005 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information - Site Information Analyst EAG Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Background Intersection Frontage Road/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustmerits�°� Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 223 18 24 360 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 223 18 24 360 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized I 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR 1 LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 48 9 29 32 10 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 48 9 29 32 10 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR b ay, { ue ie'' Length, and Level of:Servic .. w ,x .. ,. _ k„ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 22 24 86 67 C (m) (vph) 1188 1337 408 408 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.16 95% queue length 0.06 0.05 0.79 0.58 Control Delay 8.1 7.7 16.2 15.5 LOS A A C C Approach Delay -- -- 16.2 15.5 Approach LOS -- -- C C Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d f;1P•//(`•\rinrt,mantc0/-')(lanr10/i(Kettinoc\rnrtic rnwe\T.nasal%7tl.Settinoc\Temn\tt7k17P tmn 8/R/2005 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i • 1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General_Information; Site Information Analyst EAG Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period AM Total Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Frontage Road/CR 100 CDOT Year 2010 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and„ Adjustments, Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 176 30 44 145 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 176 30 44 145 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 28 6 39 24 4 9 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 6 39 24 4 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,; Queue Length, and: Level of Service K ,.. �__.....n fin. _ .,s7, h ._.. , * A. Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 11 44 73 37 C (m) (vph) 1452 1377 644 539 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.07 95% queue length 0.02 0.10 0.38 0.22 Control Delay 7.5 7.7 11.3 12.2 LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay -- -- 11.3 12.2 Approach LOS -- -- 8 8 Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file•HCATlnrnmente/,'Mand°/?(Nettinac\nnrtic rnwe\T.nral%7OCettinag\Temn\n7k1R1 tmn R/R/2(105 1 1 1 1 1 1 NIP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.• 1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information . Site Information - ,.. Analyst EAG Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/15/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Total Intersection Frontage Road/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Frontage Road North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 247 22 24 379 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 247 22 24 379 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 52 9 29 32 10 25 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 9 29 32 10 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,':LiueuoLength, and Level of Service Eastbound Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 22 24 90 67 C (m) (vph) 1168 1306 378 383 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.17 95% queue length 0.06 0.06 0.91 0.63 Control Delay 8.1 7.8 17.5 16.4 LOS A A C C Approach Delay -- -- 17.5 16.4 Approach LOS -- -- C C Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 1:1,.. //r.\T ,,,.,,to/ Inco*t:..nn\Tom+-+\n71r2'7T f /2 nn 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst EAG ncy/Co. Kimley-Horn e Performed 12/16/2004 Analysis Time Period AM Total Intersection Access Driveway/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Access Driveway North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 197 0 0 161 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 197 0 0 161 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 I 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 6 0 0 -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rly Flow Rate, HFR litk 0 0 0 6 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue,Lengt ,rand Level of.Serv3,2".:. Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 1 6 C (m) (vph) 1421 639 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 7.5 10.7 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.7 Approach LOS -- -- B is Reserved 2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Intersection Access Driveway/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2006 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I General Information Analyst EAG IIPncy/Co. Kimley-Horn e Performed 12/16/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Total Site Information Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Access Driveway IIntersection Orientation: North-South North/South Street: CR 100 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Ve 101e Volumes and Adjustments IMovement Major Street Northbound 1 1 1 2 3 Southbound 4 5 6 L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1 245 0 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 245 0 0 L 0 1.00 0 0 T 400 1.00 400 R 23 1.00 RT Channelized Lanes IConfiguration Iln i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 Undivided 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 28 0 2 k -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - rly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 28 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and, Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 1 30 C (m) (vph) 1147 442 v/c 0.00 0.07 95% queue length 0.00 0.22 Control Delay 8.1 13.7 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 13.7 Approach LOS -- -- B is Reserved IooTm Version 4.1d 1 Copyright © 2003 university of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d le 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1is 1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information,.. Intersection Access Driveway/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Analyst EAG Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/16/2004 Analysis Time Period AM Total Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Access Driveway North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehlcle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 211 0 0 174 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 211 0 0 174 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 6 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 6 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR belay; Queue- ength, -and'Levei of Sera lloe^ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 1 6 C (m) (vph) 1405 617 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 7.6 10.9 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 10.9 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d C1,..//C`.\ .a.,10/7fQattin (-To \Temrs\,i71r/RF, tmrt R/R/')MS le 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General 1 formation Site Information Analyst EAG Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 12/16/2004 Analysis Time Period PM Total Intersection Access Driveway/CR 100 Jurisdiction CDOT Analysis Year 2010 Project Description 067871004 - Aspen Equestrian East/West Street: Access Driveway North/South Street: CR 100 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes; and Ad'ust-Men ts Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 263 0 0 433 23 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 263 0 0 433 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U•stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 28 0 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 28 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela ""'kQueue Len • th and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound bound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 1 30 C (m) (vph) 1115 414 v/c 0.00 0.07 95% queue length 0.00 0.23 Control Delay 8.2 14.4 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 14.4 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id r _ ...,..10/'Ino ,E: f; .-....,o\T 10/-7nQattin tc\TPmr1\ii2 r1RQ tmn R/R/7nn5 • • 4.08.05 ) -(g) CONSIDERATION OF NATURAi. ENVIRONMENT (g) Evidence that the PUD has been designed with consideration of the natural environment (Attie site and the surrounding area and does not unreasonably destroy or displace wildlife, natural vegetation or unique natural or historical features. The applicant may submit any other information or exhibits, which she/he deems pertinent in evaluating his proposed PUD. (A. 79-132) The entire area of the Equestrian Lot is intensely used for activities related to the commercial equestrian operation currently occupying thesite. The proposed development will not destroy any unique vegetation or wildlife habitat nor displace any significant wildlife population. BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER • 40 Beach Environmental, LLC Ron Liston The Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Re: Preshana Farms Dear Mr. Liston: November 21, 2005 At your request, I have completed a site reconnaissance of the property on the north edge of the Preshana Farms, adjacent to the Catharine's Store. This area, between the Catharine's Store parking lot and the horse paddocks, does contain a small amount of hydrophytic vegetation, including grasses that are typical to wetland areas. However, since these grasses thrive in conditions where water is available for at least 5 percent of the growing season, these grasses can exist in areas that are not jurisdictional wetlands. It is clear that the ditch is unlined and, therefore, is likely to seep water during normal operations, and, grasses and other hydrophytic vegetation are normal in an environment where water in abundance. A sampling of the soils along the ditch did not reveal any mineral reduction occurring and there was no indication of hydric conditions Consequently, based on the lack of hydric soils and the nature of these plants, this ditch would not be considered jurisdictional wetlands under the U.S Army Corps of Engineers' definition of jurisdictional waters of the United States. Other existing vegetation along the ditch include elm and alder trees, as well as serviceberry, Woods Rose, and plumeless thistle. Should you have any questions regarding the wetland evaluation of this property, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, By 517 E. Hopkins Avenue Suite 100 Aspen. CO 81611 Tel (970) 925-3475 Fax QZ5-4754 0004.LLC\BE Correspondence • • • SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE At the time of final subdivision platting (in accordance with the phasing schedule), the owner of the four proposed single family lots will pay standard cash in lieu impact fees as specified by County Subdivision Regulations. FIRE DISTRICT IMPACT FEES At the time of final subdivision platting (in accordance with the phasing schedule), the owner of the property will pay the standard Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District impact fees for the four single family lots and the proposed neighborhood commercial development. 4.08.06 Notwithstanding the rezoning of an overall area as PUD, no portion thereof shall be used or developed until a signed subdivision plat for said portion shall have been approved by the County Commissioners as if required by the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. (amended 2002-12) 41 4.09 DEVELOPMENT IN STAGES 4.09.01 The applicant must begin development of the PUD within one (1) year from the time of its final zone change approval; provided, however, that the PUD may be developed in stages and the Board may approve the commencement of development activity beyond one (1) year. The applicant must complete the development ofeach stage and of the PUD as a whole in substantial compliance with the development schedule approved by the County Commissioners. (A. 97-109) The applicant requests that the conditions of this section be satisfied by the submission of a Preliminary Plan application for the entire Equestrian Lot within one (1) year of the date of the approval of this amendment, a construction phasing schedule will be incorporated into the Preliminary Plan for approval by the County. 4.09.02 If the applicant does not comply with the time limits imposed by the preceding subsection, the County Commissioners shall review the PUD in a public hearing noticed as required m Section 10.04.01, and may revoke approval for the uncompleted portion of the PUD, or require that the PUD be amended, or extend the time for completion of the PUD one (1) time. for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the expiration of the original time limit. (A. 97-109) No response required 4.09.03 Each stage within a PUD shall by so planned and so related to existing surrounding and available facilities and services that failure to proceed to a subsequent stage will not have a substantial adverse impact on the PUD or its surroundings. The construction phasing schedule described herein is a logical sequencing of utilities and roads such that if subsequent phases are not developed for some time, the completed areas of the development will function efficiently. 4.09.04 If a PUD contains nonresidential uses, they may by constructed in advance of residential uses if the County Commissioners find that such phasing is consistent with sound principles of ordered development and will have no substantial adverse effect on the quality or character of the PUD. The neighborhood commercial area is proposed as the final stage of development of the PUD. 4.09.05 The development and construction of and within all PUDs shall be done in such manner and fashion that minimizes disturbance to adjacent land uses and owners. Access for all construction equipment shall be designated within the PUD proposal and shall bear a logical relationship to any proposed phasing of the development. Minimal construction will be required for the creation of the proposed single family lots since no new road construction is required. Construction access to the neighborhood commercial village will initially be through the current access to the Equestrian Lot; subsequent to the completion of the new access to the neighborhood commercial village, access will be directly from CR 100. 42 4.10 MAINTENANCE OF COMMON OPEN SPACE The Common Open Space of a PUD may be owned and maintained by the property owners within the PUD or by an organization chosen therefrom or thereby. In the event that the organization established to own and maintain Common Open Space, or any successor organization. shall at any time after establishment of the PUD fail to maintain the Common Open Space in reasonable order and condition in accordance with the Plan, the County Commissioners may serve written notice upon such organization or upon the residents of the PUD setting forth the manner in which the organization has failed to maintain the Common Open Space in reasonable condition, and said notice shall include a demand that such deficiencies of maintenance be cured within 30 days thereof and shall state the date and place of a hearing thereon which shall be held within 14 days of notice. At such hearing the County Commissioners may modify the terms of the original notice as to deficiencies and may give an extension of time within which they shall be cured. If the deficiencies set forth in the original notice or in the modifications thereof are not cured within said 30 days or any extension granted, the County Commissioners, in order to preserve the taxable values of the properties within the PUD and to prevent the Common Open Space from becoming a public nuisance, may enter upon said Common Open Space and maintain the same for a pend of one year. Said entry and maintenance shall not vest in the public any rights to use the Common Open Space except when the same has been voluntarily dedicated to the public by the owners. Before the expiration of said year, the County Commissioners shall, upon their initiative or upon the written request of the organization theretofore responsible for the maintenance of the Common Open Space, call a public hearing upon notice to such organization, or to the residents of the PUD, to be held by the County Commissioners, at which hearing such organization or the residents of the PUD shall show cause why such maintenance by the County Commissioners shall not, at the election of the County Commissioners, continue for a succeeding year. If the County Commissioners shall determine that such organization is ready and able to maintain said Common Open Space in reasonable condition, the County Commissioners shall cease to maintain such Common Open Space at the end of said year. If the County Commissioners shall determine such organization is not ready and able to maintain said Common Open Space in a reasonable condition, the County Commissioners may, in their discretion, continue to maintain said Common Open Space during the next succeeding year, and subject to a similar hearing and determination, in each year thereafter. The cost of such maintenance by the County Commissioners shall be assessed to and paid by the owners of properties within the PUD that have a right of enjoyment of the Common Open Space. and any unpaid assessments shall become a tax lien on said properties. The County Commissioners shall file a notice of such lien in the office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder upon the properties affected by such lien within the PUD and shall certify such unpaid assessments for collection, enforcement, and remittance in the manner provided by law for the collection, enforcement, and remittance of general property taxes. In the event that a new domestic water system is developed to serve the neighborhood commercial village, then the water system would be owned and operated by the commercial property owners association. The park open space parcel will be developed with earthwork, a pond, landscaping and a non - potable irrigation system as an element of the common infrastructure at the time of subdivision. The commercial property owners association will be responsible for the maintenance of the open space and for that portion of the parking and internal roadways over which cross access and parking easements exist. The open space parcels to be dedicated to the AEE HOA will be maintained by that existing incorporated association. 4.11 FEE The County Commissioners may establish a fee schedule for PUD applications to cover the costs of processing and review in addition or the fee required for processing other Zone Distnct Amendments. According to the Resolution adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on February 18, 1998, the base application fee for a PUD rezoning is $500. A check for this amount has been included with this application. 4.12 ENFORCEMENT AND MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE PLAN 4.12.01 The provisions of the Plan relating to the use of land and the location of Common Open Space shall run in favor of the County and shall be enforceable in law or in equity by the County without limitation on any powers or regulation otherwise granted by law. 4.12.02 All provisions of the Plan shall run in favor of the residents, occupants and owners of the PUD, but only to the extent expressly provided in the Plan and in accordance with the terms of the Plan, and, to that extent, said provisions. whether recorded by plat, covenant, easement or otherwise, may be enforced at law or in equity by such residents. occupants or owners acting individually, jointly or through an organization designated in the Plan to act on their behalf. 43 4.12.03 All those provisions of the Plan authorized to be enforced by the County may be modified, removed or released by the County, subject to the following: (1) No modification, removal or release of the provisions of the Plan by the County shall affect the rights of the residents, occupants and owners of the PUD to maintain and enforce those provisions at law or in equity, and (2) No substantial modifications, removal or release of the provisions of the Plan by the County shall be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public heanng called and held in accordance with the provisions of Section 24-67-104. C.R.S., that the preservation of the entire PUD does not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the PUD, or the public interest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. (3) If time-share or fractional ownership units or other similar interest in property are proposed after PUD zoning is granted by the Board of County Commissioners, an application for such designation shall contain unanimous approval of all owners of real property within the PUD. (A. 97-109) (4) No modification removal or release of a TPUD plan shall be permitted which would cause any conflict with the operation or utilization of the adjacent Mass Transit Facility or with any of the standards contained in Section 5.11 et seq. of this zoning resolution. (added 2002-12) 4.12.04 Residents and owners of the PUD may, to the extent and in the manner expressly authorized by the provisions of the Plan, modify, remove or release their rights to enforce the provisions of the Plan, but no such action shall affect the right of the County to enforce the provisions of the Plan. 4.12.05 PROVISION FOR INDEPENDENT OR OUTSIDE LEGAL AND/OR TECHNICAL EXPERTISE The County Commissioners acknowledge and find that, from time to time, the County may be required to obtain independent or outside legal and technical counsel and/or opinions concerning PUD or TPUD proposals. The County Commissioners shall have the authority to retain these experts or expertise at the sole cost of the PUD or TPUD applicant(s). After referral, the Board may retain assistance if requested by the Planning Commission, or to address any unforeseen technical or legal issue, not previously foreseen. At such time of retention of outside expertise, the PUD or TPUD applicant shall be advised of the nature of the outside expert review and a payment schedule shall be established. (A. 97-109) (amended 2002-12) 4.14 AFFORDABLE HOUSING GUIDELINES - No additional information is required by this section and therefore the text of this section is not shown. 44 0 IV. SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION FORM COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3.00 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS w 3.10 NOT APPLICABLE 3.20 NOT APPLICABLE 3.30 SKETCH PLAN REQUIREMENTS EQUESTRIAN LOT SKETCH PLAN 3:40 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A. Water Supply - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (i) of the PUD Application B. Sewage Disposal - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (ii) of the PUD Application C. Soil Evaluations - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (iv) of the PUD Application D. Natural Environment - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (g) of the PUD Application E. Radiation Hazard - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (e) (iv) of the PUD Application F. Access - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (7) (f) of the PUD Application G. Public Utilities - Refer to Section 4.08.05 (2) of the PUD Application 45 • Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.945.3470 www.garfield-county.com Subdivision Application Form GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) • Subdivision Name: Aspen Equestrian Estates Subdivision P.U.D. y Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types): Sketch Plan _XXX_ Preliminary Plan Final Plat - Name of Property Owner (Applicant): Aspen Equestrian Estates, LLC, Jay Weinberg • Address: P.O. Box 2598 Telephone: (858) 756-3454 City: Rancho Santa Fe State: CA Zip Code: 92067 FAX: (858) 756-7232 Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc): Ronald Liston y Address: 918 Cooper Avenue Telephone: (970) 945-2246 • City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970) 945-4066 • Name of Engineer: Address: High Country Engineering, Inc. Telephone: (970) 945-8676 City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970) 945-2525 Name of Surveyor: • Address: Same as Engineer ➢ City: State: Telephone: Zip Code: FAX: • Name of Planner: Address: Same as Owner's RepresentativeTelephone: City: State: Zip Code: FAX: Property Current Land Use Designation: Location of Property: Section 31 • • Township 7 South Range 87 West ➢ Practical Location / Address of Property: 3275 CR 100, Carbondale, CO 81623; CR 100 southwest of Hwy 82 intersection ➢ Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres): 15.2 acres ➢ Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision: 13 o Property's Current Zone District: Preshana Farm PUD, Equestrian Center District and Open Space District o Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Existing Subdivision Proposed Utility Service: ➢ Proposed Water Source: Central Community Water System or AEE/BC Water Assoc. ➢ Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: Ranch at Roaring Fork Central Treatment ➢ Proposed Public Access VIA: County Road 100 and Equestrian Way ➢ Easements: Utility: Utility and access Ditch: NA Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below): ➢ Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below): (1) Residential Floor Area (sq. ft.) Units/Lots Size (Acres) Parking Provided (2) Commercial 20,000 Single -Family 110+/- 5 3.37 6 per lot Duplex (4) Public /Quasi -Public Multi -Family (5) Open Space / Common Area Mobile Home Total Total Base Fee: Sketch Pian - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200 paid on Floor Area (sq. ft.) Size (Acres) Parking Provided (2) Commercial 20,000 3.31 110+/- (3) Industrial (4) Public /Quasi -Public .30 (5) Open Space / Common Area 5.23 Total Base Fee: Sketch Pian - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200 paid on r I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and 3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following address: http://www.garfield-countv.com/building and planninq/index.htm A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this application form. 4. Process / Public Meeting The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review. • If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant. At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1 -year from the meeting date before the Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to the Planning Department within the 1 -year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a Preliminary Plan review. B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as well as other state and local referral agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the process that will either approve or deny the application request. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to 4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC which is addressed in Sections 4:20 — 4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations. 4. Process / Public Hearings The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-making entities during public hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC. In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at 111, this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be fumished in advance to the applicant prior to the public hearings. As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The • Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is responsible for making a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval, or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final Plat Review. C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during the Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County's subdivision process. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the Preliminary Plan review process. 4. Process The Final Plat review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or meeting and therefore does not require public notice.) If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department ilb Op and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat. Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process. Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of the applicant to complete the Final Plat process. Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations or access them on-line at: O i artiei£ COt!nC' , ,3t i bu l ina and k i n n it 'tcie; .ntrn in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review, and Final Plat Review. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. -1 of applicant/owner) Date .r� Last Revised: 11/21/2002 8 • • N10°03'0$, 00 iI S00°1 806 FIDS 3IHdV21J 0 z 0 0 1 to 5 4 E n �y ▪ rG. row C7 b ng gh>1a 8 0 0 e Q • d Da CR #100 z C C) z =m 0m o 7323 rnW o 70 C) ro p p (n n a 2 Z m rn 5 x�Zx r Q 0 0s C z rn z nwoz o - -4 0 n 341 ell � t0'0>r z N0r7tr, 0x z 6 rm> z x<�ro 0 $ No z z z 00'0£0140Z 'ON 103rO d GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PRESHANA FARM PUD EQUESTRIAN LOT SKETCH PLAN HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE HONE (970)) 945-8676 STE 101, N FAX (SPRINGS,0601 www.hceng.com awn by MRL 11-25- s: SP -01 NO. DATE REVISION 8Y CALLLATER OOF COLOROA00O 1-800-922-1987 OR 534 - 06700 IN METRO DENVER CALL E2 -BUSINESS ' BBEU INOEUSSp�04 5 IN ADVANCE EXCAVATE FOR 7HE MARKIN0 OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UI1U11ES • • /Y.57- • GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PRESHANA FARM PUD EQUESTRIAN LOT HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. -by- MRL 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE F-120, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 PHONE (303) 925-0544 FAX (303) 925-0547 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE (970) 945-8676 FAX (970) 945-2555 chocked by. REW dale. 9-6-05 Ia NO. DATE REVISION BY CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 OR 534 - 06700 1N METRO DENVER CALL 2 -BUSINESS GAYS IN ADVANC BEFORE 701101 GRADE. OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF 1-r-) Vi 1.7 ' i ,,..., 0-4 i.-!.(rq PI e'l ▪ 1-- • r''.. i-- 1— , i.... ..., , ,- \--) 1-0 ••+.• )1, • it......1 ittat r -D V, ril 1--, 1-, ("") P--. ,--1.- ,--i r r'D - r -dr I-... n 1,-,z, ,•••+ -1- r-- • ,,..0„.„,. r -t 1— 0- • • ItIt l' 0 1.' ttl,t CO IA %....1 r•rq • n t••••+- 1—at• l' Cr q 1.` q" ' 4 r's, •r0 -- i f, el I --, J • am.J. , it.....th I....6' .2 1....":"....., ,..L 1— it.,r'l (j) i...t. *to, ....," i''' 1.' rD rjral ....I.' r't 1.....)e, nt' t,st 1—, ,--, ,,z, ,-+ ,--i- LI, i 0 t") , -.;. p—a • ..., rt• r', (....4 0 \-/ i i 1.- . t••-1. 'Z• "Th ki-- r•—tft• .t...t ' 1- n I.—I t—t- , It—, ^ 7--Z+ 111 i.. i..'d 1 i....' fl L) ori i-.. Crq I-, ..-1- 1-... i -' n r- ,-.-i 0, — o.,., I.- 1.-.' ).- i-.. ,....' ,.....i. i -t 'f .-1,.. el 0" Ci 1 - - ) ▪ ) frt • i•••••' "ttt:t• 1 1 1 1 1 CO. ROAD 100 • PUD MASTER PLAN SITE PLANNING: PRESHANA • CO. ROAD 100 • 0 • • PRESHANA FARM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LAND USE SUMMARY Revised 8-02-89 DWELLING ACRES % OF UNITS PUD Open Space District 30.6 52.85 EQUESTRIAN CENTER DIST.(Employee Housing) 10 10.2 17.62 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT 15 10.9 18.83 CLUSTER HOUSING DISTRICT 11 3.6 6.22 SERVICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DWELLING UNITS 2 2.6 4.49 LODGING UNITS 10 (by Special Use Review) TOTAL DWFLTJNG UNITS 38 57.9 TOTAL LODGING UNITS . 10 100.00 GROSS DENSITY(Dwelling Units) .66 Units/Acre CO. ROAD 100 1 t PRESHANA FARM PUD LAND USE SUMMARY 7/24/97 • • Dwelling Units Acres % of PUD Open Space District Equestrain Center District R20 - Single Family Residential District R10 - Single Family Residential District Road Right -of -Way 4 20 30 22.4 9.2 12.2 8.9 5.2 39% 16% 21% 15% 9% TOTAL PUD 54 57.9 Gross Density of Total PUD 0.9 UNITS/ACRE 1.1 ACRES/UNIT Net Density of Residential Districts 2.4 UNITS/ACRE 100% • 1 � ^ / J r / /r / i.I , / I ;.\ r I ', \ 1 r r 1 1 / rF . 1 1'' I r.' 1 II r i•, 1•. / •, I 'I r / 1 1 I ,.1 I 1 / 1 1, I CO. ROAD 100 / / / / / v) / 1 /0 1 /i / / / ' f / 11 / / ,,.......• ,s,y.s..Q III 111, 1111 ••,e�. ///' //r / / 1 8 n 01 01 00 CO C \ .o m