The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 Applicationo GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 1OB 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945. 821 2 Facsim i le : 970.384. 347 0 www. oarf ield-countv.com Subdivision Application Form GENERAL INFORMATION Subdivision Name: Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types): Sketch Plan X Preliminary Plan - Final Plat ,@ttli,Wry r Un4 rerephore: ?z 8#6!10,. , city: ll Zip Code: hnn ?f FAxrqZ {32./G/ if , etc): tftcy'eV{oyttno Aidrers, A t rfuc Telephone: 7fi:6655 City:State: G 6uot FAX:1 Co Zip Code: O/@0/ F Nameof Enqineer: R,A barr% 1 KdfVrznzhtn CIu(:? F Address:elephone: ?*f'2il 6 F City:state: G Zip code: 6/bo FAx:74t'2278 ,%ar/ betlbr- furtt EnY'trcet77r tLc Telephone:ae.o)// state: Co Zip code: 6/A z> rnx:76f '0)/ 3 Name of Planner, il/*- Address:Telephone: State: ZiP Code: -- FAX: (To be completed by the applicant.) Address: City: , City: I. THE SUBDIVISION PROGESS ln order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Revis,tr Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and 3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and SubdMision Regulations are located for purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following address: http://raryw.qarfield-countv.com/buildinq andJlanninqiindex.htrn A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Puroose The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfteld County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to cornplete the Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the division of a lot, tract or parcel bf land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple-dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Apptication / Submittal Requirements "r' ln order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to satisff the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this application form. 4. Process / Public Meetinq The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1-step process because the application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. ln order to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. lf Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." lt is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been { scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request theapplicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review. lf Staff determines that all the required inforrnation has not been submitted, a.letter wiltbe sent to the applicant indicating the application doefrit compiy with the submittalrequirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that theapplicant knows what additionat information needs to be submitted. At this poini, tf,"applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to thePlanning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technicallycomplete. lf the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,the application will be terminated. Once. the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has beenestablished as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Statf wittconduct a land use review of the application using the County's land ,r" i"grl"to.ydocuments including the Zoning Resolution, SubOivision Regulations, a"nd theComprehensive Plan of 2000. ln iddition, Staff will also .on"iO"i referral commentsprovided from a-va{ety of state and local agencies who may also review the appllcaiion.As a result, Staff will write a Memorandurn on the proposed subdivision to tilTh;;i;gCommission containing the resutts on the land use analysis. This Memorandum willalso be furnished in advance to the applicant. At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Comrnission, Staffwill present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant-will O. requii"O iopres-ent the proposed subdivision and respond to comments'and questions proriJ"J uvthe Planning Commission. The commenis provided .to the Applicant by $i" Firr.i;gDepartment and the Planning Commission as a result of the b'ketch plin proc"", *iilbe kept on file in the Planning Department for 1-year from the meeting date before thePlanning Commission. tf an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary nlan applical;; i;the Planning Department within the 1-year timeframe, the Sketln plan'ile will beclosed and the Applicant will need to ieapply for a Sketch Ptan review prior to-aPreliminary Plan review. B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Puroose The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review ofthe many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield Cointy for thepurposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is it'," ,ortintensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the planning Commir*ion,and the Board of county Commissioneis (BOCC) wiii conduct a thorougl review of alithe issues asso.ciated with the proposed subdivision against the Couity's regulatoryrequirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the'majoi issues! tfr" proposed subdivision by using the iounty's Zoning Resolution, SubdivisionRegulations, Comprehensive Plan of2000, as well as othlr state and local referralagencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is theprocess that will either approve or deny the ipplication request. 2. Applicabilitu lny.. individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield county is required to complete thePreliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in GarfieldCounty's Subdivision process. More specificatly, Garfield County oennes a subdivisionas the division of a lot, tract or parcel of tand inio two (2) omor" tois, iracts, parcels orseparate interests, or the use of any parcet of land foi condominiums, apartments orother multiple-dwelling units, as furthei defined by colorado state law. 9g:1fAjo _ilpr[j?:.." L,^.],rL?Jj,T T:yi"*: ,an Appricant must have arready- ' - 'rr.''completed the sketch plan review process addressed iin Section 3:00 of theSubdivision Regulations. An .applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this,n "onlrinJJ'i" s".tiJrJ';l;d',;4.f1t ^C 1l-- 6--L-rr .,vvllvt tD .f .-lv tu flii::,kl$:::'::ffs:l1L:1.^?:J"Jl,as address.au "iin" ,ppii."or" pesion andlmprovement Standards in Section g:00 of the Subdivision negutaiions. ln addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivisionproject itself, an applicant is required to cornplete all the puOlil nJtice requirements soth.at legal public hearings can be held beforethe Ptanningre-offi;ssi;n and the BqCCwhich is addressed in Sections 4:20 - 4:31 ofthe Subdiviiion negul"iions. 4 Process / public Hearinos The.. Preliminary. Plgn review process is considered a 2-step process, because theapplication is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-maling'"ntiti"s orring pubfichearings:the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to ine Boii.'-"'." ln order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission andthe BoCC, an applicant will have submitted all requireJ af-ptication submittalrequirements mentioned above to the Ptanning Department Staf. Once rrUritt"J,Staff will have 30 working days to review the app-licatibn to aeieilil; if a1 the ;ilir;submittal information haJbeen submitted as required. If Staff determines.that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will besent to the applicant indicating the apptication has been o""mLJ "t*nri.rjivcomplete." lt is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has beenscheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BoCb. Additionallt, bi;ffwill provide the applicant with the notice formJto be mailed, published, and posted. lf Staff determines that fl t!." required information has not been submitted, a letter willbe sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittalrequirements and therefore has determined the application io be ,.t""nni."irv incomplete'' The letter witl atso outline the applications deficiencies so that the 7 applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, theapplicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to thePlanning Departnrent to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technicilly complete' lf the application has not been deemed technically iomplete within this time,the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has beenestablished as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application,Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County'.'i.nJ ,."regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subd-ivision Regulations, andthe Comprehensive Plan of 2000. ln addition, Staff will also consider referral commentsprovided fom a_variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum -on the proposed subdivision to the planning Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. ThisMemorandum will also be fumished in advance to the applicant prior to ifre puUiic hearings. As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission andthe BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. TheApplicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who isresponsibl" fq laking a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, ordenial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC aurini aggular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from ihePlanning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by theapplicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making Lntityregarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditi-onr, o,.deny the application. lf the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approvalshall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board ,pjror"t,or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is'grantedby the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval.'(See the lpecificinformation provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following thehearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializ"i tn"action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerkand Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they arerequired to complete the third and final step in the County's Su6ivision process: Final Plat Review. c) Final Plat Review (section 5:00 of the subdivision Regulations) 1. Puroose The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required duringthe Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction oithe Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will sign the Final Plat and have it recorded mernorializing the subdivision approval granted by the Bocc. This is the last step in the county's subdivision process. 2. Applicabilitv fny individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete theFinal Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Su'OOivisionprocess. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a [ot,tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, orthe use oj any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple-dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 9! o.$9r to apply for a Final Ptat revie.w, an Applicant must have already completed thePreliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of ine SubdivisionRegulations. {1 applicant reguesting Final Ptat review will be required to submit this application form,all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of tne SuUOivision Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of thePreliminary Plan review process. 4. Process The Final Plat review process is considered a 1-step process because the applicationis ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning'Siaff and presented to the BOCCforth-eir signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to thesatisfaction of the Building and planning Department. lf Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will besent .to !h" applicant indica_ting the application has been deemed "technicallycomplete.' lt is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has Oeenscheduled t9 be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is noi a public hearing -r meeting and therefore does not require public nbtice.; ff Staff determines that all the required inforrnation has not been submitted, a letter willbe sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittalrequirements and therefore has determined the application io be "tecnnicai[i incqmplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that theapplicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has beenestablished as to when the BOCC will review the Finai Plat, Staff will review theapplication / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submiftal informationsatisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions ofapproval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor forreview an! a signature. ln the event there are additional questions or clarificationissues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generalty contact the applic.ni iohave the. plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and allrequired information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Departmeni and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat. Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and Recorder's Office for a fee of $t t for the first sheet and $1 0 for each additional sheet thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process. Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of the applicant to complete the Final Plat process. Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield County. lt is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase the Garfield Gounty Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations or access them on-line at: http://www.qarf ield-cou ntv.com/bu i I d i nq and plan n i nq/i ndex. htm in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review, and Final Plat Review. which is r_ate to the best of my knowledge. 'owner) Last Revise d: 07 lzilzoo|?izrlteA I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information /o December 15,2005 Mr. Fred Jarman, Planner Garfield County Planning and Zoning cc Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Subject: Dear Fred, Panorama Reserve Subdivision TBD Panorama Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 Sketch Plan Submittal The purpose of this application along with the enclosed supporting materials is to request review of the proposed subdivision. The current lot is approximately 46.069 acres and we are requesting we be allowed to subdivide the property into three lots of approximately12.456; t4.i57: and 19.56 acres. Each lot will be provided with the potential for development of private driveways fiom Panorama Drive. The existin g 46-acre parcel has an existing *ill upproved for a maximumof three dwelling units. The three newly created lots would strare ttre existing well. Eachlot would have a building envelope for a residence and a second building env*elope for asingle agricultural outbuilding. Lots I &2 have two potential locationslor the outbuilding and Lot 3 has three potential locations for the outbuilding. The Lot 3 building envelope islarger to allow future development of a pool and a tennis court. Electrical power for the subdivision will be served by the existing Holy Cross pole-mounted transformer located at the South end of the existing easement. Each lot will be providedwith buried LPG storage tanks for heating and cooking needs. Waste treatment will be serviced by conventional in-ground septic tank and leach field disposal systems. Enclosed are fifteen copies of the following materials;- sketch Site Plan, lzll5lo5, llxl7, by Red Mountain Civil, Inc.; and- Subdivision Application Form, l2ll1l05 Call me at 970 379-9239 if you need anyrhing else. Best Regards, Jack Palomino Architect, AIA 05- 1 34S kerchPlanSubmir JP/jp Encl. phnning Re: 8l-5 blake avenue glenwmd springs, colorado gl60l p 97O 945 665 f 9'/0 945 6f,A5 www.palominobarrh.com GARFIELD COT.INTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCIIEDULE Garfield County, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners ("Board") Resolution No. 98-09, has established a fee structure ("Base Fee") for the processing of each type of subdivision and land use applications. The Base Fee is an estimate of the average number of hours of staff time devoted to an application, multiplied by an hourly rate for the personnel involved. The Board recognized that the subdivision and land use application processing time will vary and that an applicant should pay for the total cost of the review which rnay require additional billing. Hourly rates based on the hourly salary, and fringe benefits costs of the respective positions combined with an hourly overhead cost for the office will be used to establish the actual cost of County stafftime devoted to the review of a particular project. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the Base Fee. After the Base Fee has been expended, the applicant will be billed based on actual staff hours accrued. Any billing shall be paid in full prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment or subdivision plan. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. Checks, including the appropriate Base Fee set forth below, must be submitted with each land use application, and made payable to the Garfield Countv Treasurer. Applications will not be accepted without the required application fee. Base Fees are non-refundable in full, unless a written request for withdraw from the applicant is submitted prior the initial review of the application materials. Applications must include an Agreement for payrnent Form ("Agreement,,) set forth below. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. The complete fee schedule for subdivision and land use applications is attached. /z GARFIED COUNTY BUILDTNG AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASE FEES The following Base Fees shall be received by the County at the time of submittal of any procedural application to which such fees relate. Such Base Fees shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board for the consideration of any application or additional Counfy stafftime or axpense not covered by the Base Fee, which have not otherwise beenpaid by the applicant to the County prior to final action upon the application tendered to the County. TYPE OF PROCEDURE Vacating Public Roads & Rights-of-Way Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plat Amended Plat Exemption fromthe Definition of Subdivision (SB-35) Land Use Permits (Special use/Conditional (Jse permits) ' Administrative/no public hearing $250. Board Public Hearing only $400. Planning Commission and Board review & hearing $525 Zonng Amendrnentst Zone District map amendment. Zone District text amendmentt Zone District r.np &text amendment. PUD Zone District & Text Amendment. PUD Zone District Text Amendment Board of Adjustment. Variancer Interpretation Planning Staff Hourly Rate. Planning Director. Senior Planner. Planning TechnicianI Secretary County Surveyor Review Fee (includes reyiew of Amended Plats, Final Plqts, Exemption Plats) Mylar Recording Fee BASE FEE $400 $325 $675 + application agency review fees and outside consultant review fees, as authorized pursuant to the Regulations, such as the Colorado Geologic Survey $200 $100 $300 s450 $300 $s00 $500 $s00 $250 $250 $50.s0 $40.s0 $33.7s $30 Determined by Surveyor$ $11 - 1$ page $10 each additional page /s The following guidelines shall be used for the administration of the fee structure set forth above: 1. AII applications shall be submitted with a signed Agreement for Payment form set forth below. 2. County staff shall keep accurate record of actual time required for the processing of each land use application, zoning amendment, or subdivision application. Any additional billing will occur commensurate with the additional costs incurred by the County as a result of having to take more time that that covered by the base fee. 3. Any biilings shall be paid prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. All additional costs shall be paid to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application. 4. Final Plats, Amended or Corrected Plats, Exemption Plats or Permits will not be recorded or issued until all fees have been paid. 5. In the event that the Board determines that special expertise is needed to assist them in the review of a land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision application, such costs will be borne by the applicant and paid prior to the final consideration of the application. All additional costs shall be paid prior to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application. 6. If an application involves multiple reviews, the Applicant shall be charged the highest Base Fee listed above. 7 . Types of "Procedures" not listed in the above chart will be charged at an hourly rate based on the pertinent planning staff rate listed above. 8. The Planning Director shall establish appropriate guidelines for the collection of Additional Billings as required. 9. This fee structure shall be revised annually as part of the County budget hearing process. /* GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDTNG AND PLANNING DBPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYI\{ENT FORM (Shall be submitted with application) GARFIELD COLINTY (hereinafter CoUNTY> ^ a Ep VW LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) agree as follows: 7. a APPLICANT lras,submitted to COTINTY an application for -?il;;;ffi;iH'ffifficrl 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each tlpe of subdivision or land use review applications, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. APPLICANT and COLINTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the PROJECT, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT. APPLICANT agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional COLINTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, APPLICANT shall pay additional billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNry for the processing of the PROJECT mentioned above. APPLICANT acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the COLINTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. APPLICANT (Or*rrrt fr7rcleu.rh hve) ort". /z/E/ai- I r*, rno,&,- ht &th ; f" cz) M^itins^ddress' f1#!!;f {(Tl ,o @ 8tao1 Print Name /6 FORM NO. GWS-76 0a2005 2. LAND USE 3. NAME OF EXISTING PARCEL AS RECORDED: SUBDIVISION: 5. NUMBER OF LOTS 6. PARCEL HISTORY- Please attach copies of Page 1 1 ATTACHMENT G WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION SUMMARY STATE OF COLOMDO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1313 Sherman St., Room 818, Denver, CO 8OZOS Phone - lnfo (303) 866-3587 Main (303) 856-3581 Fax (303) 866-35s9 htto://www.water.state.co.us Section 30-28-133,(d), C.R.S. requires that the applicant submlt to the County, "Aciequate evidence that a waier supply that issufficient in terms of quantity, qualiiv, and dependability wiil be available tc ensure an adequate suoolv of warer , PROPOSED: Vfi/a* B. Has the parcel ever been part of a division of land action since June 1 , 1g72?NyES or ! NO lf yes, describe the 7. LOCATION OF PARCEL - tnctude a area and tie to a section corner. _1/4 of the _1/4, Section , Township tr n or,,lg S, Range nrorffw Principal Meridian:nsixtn fJruew Mexico DUte ECostitla Optional GPS Location: GPS Unit must use the following settings: Format must be UTM, Units must be meters, Datum must be NAD83, Unit must be setto true N, Z zone 12 or D Zone 13 Nort PLAT- Location of all wells on property must be plotted and permit numbers provided. S Plat: FI YES or D NO lf not, scaled hand drawn sketch: E yES or E ttO 10. WATER SUPPLYSOURCE PROPOSED AOUTFERS _ (cHECK ONE) tr ALLUVIAL E UPPER ARAPAHOE tr UPPER DAWSON E LOWER AMPAHOE E LOWER DAWSON EI LAMMIE FOX HITLS tr DENVER E OTHER: E DAKOTA WATER COURT DECREE CASE NUMBERS: 11.WAS AN ENGINEER'S WATERM YES or NO IF YES, PLEA-SE FORWMhabefore our review is 12. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM A. Was parcel recorded with county prior to June 1 , 1972? n yfS or E NO SEPTIC TANIVLEACH FIELD LAGOON ENGINEEF.trD SYSTEN4 (Attach a rcpy of ensineering desisn.) Easting: T CENTRAL SYSTEM DISTRICT NAME:tr tr VAULT LOCATION SEWAGE HAULED TO: OTHTR: cl'/fh'rtL FILING (UNIT BLOCK PLAT MAP ENCLOSED?YES or NO i,_gr other evidence or 4. TOTAL ACREAGE: 9. ESTIMATED WATER REQUIREMENTS WATER REQUIREMENTS drxrsrtrue D DEVELopED. WELL SPRING WELL PERMIT NUMBERS A HOUSEHOLD USE # 7 of units COMMERCTAL USE # /of S. F IRRIGATION # .Y of acres STOCKWATERING # jlof head OTHER: Gallons per Day Acre-Feet per Y f] N4UNICPAL El ASSOCTATTON T COMPANY fl DrsrRrcr NAME LEfiER OF COMMITMENT FOR SERVICE E YES Or D NO tr :urL. t/. l(]t)),lj t)frv]!i"'#rr' , - yt'|y'-$f,,sr. ra -t ' ' flPilcetirrl rrrf:l . Eo tgrrtnl.t! r*rEraDlratitrl=..lylrt w ffi'.&g.jrf#A- -traErlv d11gstalErrEE - . ' u l(t lu lYALuKUN.vv""l.':.'rGs uolrsTo}{ n '^lufllK! ttErlEERIlE Fett IIO, 9?0. , 2556 ,,,L:.mP,?,l [,L,3X.3lHH*Im._rff"* q;Fr,rrrapplrcAlraN F6Blt . - ,..,kliiEfiffiH,ffiffi#rr ,4iffi NU. uU'' r ' t' @ooz P. 02/rE RECEIYED nyirrr ttAt6t rlene Etrr€ ElelEaT. FOi oFf rry1trrn rii crlY, trr.cr.rio"r! Na. -=..-- et RlcElnr x"- Ft <.{a Z , Ith ----Eht- !5.lou=".,ffi aPEL I trA.r:triN a.FrtAIrEg tEilrrllDrsn Dt6 13"r=O (or,c Nror 9lrcrr tr$- TeqiltEiDNd G1*E-_<rrrq . ur..xq-___6-al llzlp rcrEt_+ r, . r--,d. .S -dSteric w1i67 l*yol Frlo... TvDa ol It* pymp Lrngrh 6I ?el: Flrral FtrlaplrEw€rcr a7;y4 Aa fZ?(r+t-i^t "./ - /(e r;rME_, srneEI 'l*l Foprr.Jrrrr:rrrrrrmealaFilUretrErIril +E N.rrly.r.Gf Lrtap 4c lr. Fruaeoo rsrrl Ceath Otuaincd ylcld lMct=ea! sts a^r\y _""rui.ilr r -Eaatrlrl:cn lgl'i iiHiiffi'*e( r oTrrEfi I , iiul\i;Eii;Z ,iY*g IuF4 ry,E. \r{lq,r lrlrrrtdi .r! lr, .! rE - u{lllErr,q ..h -i3-tLt"'* 05DEC, 17, 20050 3;15PMl,-[r_r:ggr"-S Rtl0 lilALDR0NlgJvrllijlJ:tz5__qossroN, N0, l20u'r t, iu Goos l!91&:gJgt,,u4:lg Pn I!!1" lulti8Y HhlMmlile Fn( [0. s?0 s{b zsss p ne/hnI,g'flffi;'tr-1 +wli, s I - -,,,L_,ij:- :T Yi:T :ril -iif;':*, _ffiis+$r*-*..r.'l', {. + {- {- +. o* + L[ q-tut"m-H-r..6t.:{r- 1 HrL\BBo EEEt --..r1' f 1 z3zo,t - I + + +l- -raffit-nsu' ; .i f .LoT_-BLEqK- . FTLTNB t__tl'----!titrtrK-_FlLlNB.1. -. -l- - I - + - +l 5t'8"*tl9l llrn+.r-I ,*, I IlUa.epp,o Ott nrrldlj lla, al rcrrs cl.rhrresotffi tfe11rrldf uorriJ l [- fl l4,,- ijT ? il :"*oIt*$ffi]-f I-+-.t I '=*-- i-J7 ;' { --'{---,I I + l' l + i..*.'.L i T-i-l- '+ fl#::"*Ero-rao-i.ll #:-, 3zo k"r;_1(o rL!.,i F%-+-1l ffiJ -4EI_LS gre dlsu"c.il6 phr fcrg{ngfing .:rH'.o,19ffi imJru{uqffiH#i#iff;I: tiol rru glH t-vlr'or rigl -__glai+-o]i- .. .uc*{pdea at tard on rfi-ch tl,d t fr. r'lrhra.rrrl rh$I. it nrnt Jl ,r*. _r* it tetsitxl -trE, - /7 N0, 120,,"t P, q eoos {AME(s) :itv.t ut !o1e 1 ?6t-l --.36-L- tr-zr {tt+ of the s3- . 1/-4, sea l3_, lt n _-I . E N. orE}s.. RangE B7 EeorEIw.. rtance rrom Secrio,n Li4E Zlzo . Ft From E U, o, )dMsian Narne Els., Zl?.o . Fb Frurn Ele. o, :::ffi ::*:i::::,=^rd:*l;Tfl=#::,HrEffi *"hffi *tr , {.n.u. Ew. un". /o/o lfinrrrsntltrffi 5c3 y-l.S +119 *r i,,i"iiLio,".c HgffilE,?ffiffi,trYX'""#f u$Eberas dr6cd lE.r .1b{. aFs"^r . aw*qc- lnsart the Wbtt nj/F|)tc. l/. 20057' 3ll6pMI'_{-.r.c0AIES RilD ![]ALDR0N:'r'_.':'jLr.es sesrrv,t N0, i20 p. i E'vy . uEu-uE-tru l{rJ ucruz Ftl nt- uuMrr EilEIlFSlllo FAN Il0. 970 g/' .155 ?, 0v0B il'l'J -, ' ., .f--€.}r,- i . '.>,trF BrcrTruJ+trt'rl r,.Ir,.o [t{u:ffiH'ffi8tr$,'_.,i*o-tl,ii[il,3i',Em.EEsouBcEs 3+cs{-q\ $.tigrEHix,tsio"B#.t := ? -a,,- *.iT]llTlcf'co E0803 r----- l-s i - r.' wrlrdihr$-.q{FaE J/i14;;ffi;6:.,tk-r*>"^t+o i 4, -, eatE,ioun-**'i*l .tp E Hbr.#hrrilE* lfr.rno.t-e-w7 4k- l,rsqota'erlrnuio . , .. lTr | --.-nrrom-: ^- le-rr. .tr I t'r:_tr! [ron_ etA_ tL DHrLuns "en{Ea- <,rt'y_g/ ,_ qAslNC EEESBD: Fl${ Erhi, suolf &Had z.Sa-trsnr--() .o ," ja?rl' Sizs - & &,tnd - lrem -ta -fL . SEg - tl kind - kaEt _ la _lr. l' I ..? . , Prrfaaud clrlq3 EEa E lclnd _- -- kc.,r -ro -i.Tr:&llnd-tlon._ro_ ,t! snoutrRdaEEtRD t,t,rerl., -C-.,* a Cf - ; I : 161gry26..f,j-i?' . .- Pheurrmt ne$* iZ,+ p.. dl t4.ze.teJ3, eRAv€Ltacft 6he lmepal rEST DAfA JT Drfe'Tesred .I.- t.*',lg -fr Strric'Wrtrr Lryd Prlsr !o - /?,':' - ,, ?ype ol Tesi fump LEn$h;ttar. J-/4 TOTALOen]f 22cr',-Srrqninad Ylal4 lMererzd /^{ €fri Flnat FurnplnE tYrtgr L+el_ts Eeingl.ta lag. /7 I ll !Il I ll F ll a llsIi lal* IIlsIt IJ l!loci2 T = aI 02Q 5 6r E Tv ttg o I I B' E I,(r.! -EL(Dt E I)l I I I I ol Eg .A P(E€v) lorL I -l\cl €(! o.s Bo ..,.-l\ln!nlH# nl lI el tHAl arr url,ttj0l :t ,rC^lt 7 .i I .tln ,-^.r^r--c eL^.071 'nil,^nah 0 ',,]' ): I I I II I I I II 2 : I I I : I: I : 0 TABTE 16.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--ConIlnued Flooding High water e I Bedrock N(,lA So11 narne and map symbol 17*,18*,19*: Cochetopa-------- | IAntrobus--------- | I2o---------------- | Coulterg 2l*, 2Z*: ICurecanti-------- I IFuqhesi---------- | I23, 24------------ |Cushool I I25*: ICushool---------- | IRentsac---------- | I26*, 21*, 2g*. IDahlquist-------- I I Southace--------- I I29*, 30*: IDollard---------- | I Rock outcrop. I I37, 32-----*------ | Dot sero 33*: IEarsman---------- | I Rock outcrop- I I34, 35, 35--------l Empedrado Etoe 38, 39, 40, 41----l IFrequency I Duration I I Klnd lMont,hs I rt I Depth I Hard- | | ness In >60 >60 >60 II >60 II >50 I | 20-40 I I Soft 120-40 I soft I j Hard8-20 Hydro- logic group B B B Potential frost actlon Risk of corrosion I lConc.rete I I Uncoated I steel D B B t\N I None-------- ;ll I None--------;lt I None-------- llt I None-------- Itttt I None-------- Jtt I None-------- 1tltt I None-------- 1 >6.0 >5.0 >6- 0 >5.0 >6. 0 >6.0 >6. 0 >6.0 >6,0 >5.0 >60 >60 lHoderate--- lModerate ltow.trl I Moderate--- I Htgh----- I 1.*.ltl I Moderate--- I Hlgh----- | High.ltrrlrrrt I Moderate--- | Moderate I Moderate.llr I Moderate--- lHoderate I Low.tlr I Low-------- | High----- I Moderat.e. I Low-------- I tllgh----- | Moderate. ltl I ModeraLe--- I Hlgh----- | I.ow.ttttlr I Low-------- I High----- I Low.rtt I Low-------- I Hlgh----- I Low.tlttlr I Low-------- | Hiqh----- I Low.trtltltlt I Moderate--- I Hiqh----- I Low.rllrtlttt I Low-------- I High----- 1 1o*.tltttttlt I Moderate--- I Hlgh----- 1 16s.rtltlt I Moderate--- lModerate I Low.ittttt I tovr-------- I High----- I Low.rttllt I I I I None-------- Itlttll I None-------- |tttilt I None-------- | I None--------;tttt I None-------- |tt >6.0 >6.0 >5.0 >5.0 >6.0 >5.0 20-40 I soft >50 I l L0-20 >60 >50 >60 I Hard U)o a)c?6 Evanston None-------- | None-------- None-------- I It--- It--- It--- I I It--- It--- It--- I I It--- It--- tl$l,s 16. --SOIL eND I9AIER FEATURES--Conr:inued Flooding n0Olo'Sol-I name and map symbol llydro- 1ogtrc grouP F.requency I Duration I Jt't6nth6 I I j Pstent.iaL I frost I actlon Risk of corroslon Depth I l(ind lMonrhs lDepthlHard- tt lUncoaLed lConcreteI eleeL l iuater table I 74--------------a: I E I I5e---------------- |RiLgore I I70, 1L, 72t 73----lKsbar I I tt I Occaslonal l'reryltlt I Nona-------- Itltl I None-------- 1tttt I ttone--------;lllt l None-------- 1IItl l None-------- ittll I Nene-------- |ltll I None-------- 1lill I None-------- 1 I None-------- Irl lNone-------- |lttt I None-------- I I Fare-------- 1llrl I None--------; Leavittville l,lll-Ierlake Morval 87*: IMorval----------- | Ilrldel I----*----- | oo*- Moyerson--------- I I Rock outcrop. I I89, 90, g1--------l Hussel B \\r.t B B lrtlttttt- bf,ief IMay'sep| 1.0-3.O IApparent i.ran*teci >60 >6.0 >6.0 >6.0 >6.0 >6.0 >6. O >5.0 >6.0 >,5.0 >6.0 >6..0 >6.0 -5-4,0IApparent I >.5.0 }a n l1 I I loesg lrn ltt--ttl I tllgh------- I Modera-te l r,ow.ttlltt I lor+-------- I H1" gh----- I tli gil.>60 | 40-60 | soft I I >6'0 I --- I I >60 ilard Hard >50 >50 _ I 10-20 I SofE >50 >60 lttltt I Eop--------,1 Hl.qh----- | rorr.tttlit I Moderare=-- | Higb----- | Loe.tltttt I Floderate--- [ tow------ I ModeraLe,ltttll I lloderate--- | High-.--- I Low.ttlrtt I Mod6rats6-;- I Hoderat€ llror,r.lttltr I Hoderate--- [Moderate I ModeraLe.lttltt I Modetate--- | Etr qb--*-- | r-o!.r. I Eoderaie--- | Hl gh----- i Lofl -ltt I Low-------- I Eish----- I Moderate. I Moderatts--- I H19h----- I 1,qe. I Iltl I Moderate--- I Htgh----- I Lor*. I I Jan-Dec >60 >60 I l0-20 | Hard rtt I Lor_-___-__ I }iigh_ -___ l,Lor,r.rltrlt I Lop-*----- I Mod.e:fate I L6rr.tlttlllll I r{oderatG--- I Hlqh----- I Uqdefatrg. ao CI' I >60 76, 11"--- Mlne ts---------r------ |lliracle I I?9, 80, 8x--------lMoen i Is2, 83------------lMonad I I84,85, s6--------l 93*--------------- I Rogert oa* oc*. Non€-------- I 194 Soil Survey TABLE 10.--BUfLDING SfTE DEVELOPMENT--Continued 5oi1 name and map symbol Shallow excavat ions DweIIings withouL basements Dwel I ings with basement.s SmaIl commercial- bui ldings Local roads and streets Lawns and landscaping ltrlrrii 3 4 ---------------- | slight --------- i sright I s l 19ht - -------- l Moderate : I Moderate : l Moderat e :Empedrado I I I lslope. lfrostacElon.lrargesrone6.rttlll35----------------lModerate: iuoderate! lModerate3 lsevere: ltlod.erate: lModerat.e!Ertpedrado I srope' i "i.p". r slope. I slope. I sIope, I large ston€s,I I I I I frostaction- | slope.tllttl36--------- lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lseveae: lsevere:Empedrado lslope. i"fop". lelope. lslope. lslope. lslope,lltttl3?--------- lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: rsevere:Etoe lslope- /slope. lslope- lslope. lslope. lslope.Itrrrlltlt38--------- lsllghr,---------isfrgl,. lsrighr_________lslighr_____-___lstighu lsIighr.Evanstonlllrrr rllttl39, 40, 41--------lsevere: lsevere: iS"r.r", lSevere: lsevere: lsevere:Evanston lslope- lslope. lslope. lslope. lslope. lslope.lltttl42*-------- lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lsevere: lsevere:FLuvaquents I ::::1!" ".r.,i rrooainq, j rtooains, I f100ding, I werness, I vreLness. frost acLionIrtr;---"'-""r""'i43*: I I I I I IForell"e---- l":i:::a", I "olerare: iModerate: I severe, lModerare: lModerare:tslope- rsrope. rslope. rslope. i"il;..=' iT;;;:':;"".",I I I I I I slope.rltttlBro$nsto--- lt:::::,- --._^ lr:g*."a"r iMod.ru."; lsevere: lModerare: lModerare:cutbanks cave. I sLope.s1ope. I slope. I slope. I small stones, I I droughE.y, | | slope. ForerLe---- is"rr".", | ".r".", I ""rr..", l"rr.r", | ".r"r., I "".,... ,I slope. I slope. I s1ope. I s1ope. I slope- | sIope.It),rtllllBrownsto--- l":.:::::, lsur"r", lsevere: lsevere: lSevere: lSevere: i ".i;;": i ":;:;::slope. J 1 I | |ttlttl45--------- lModerate: iModeraue: lModerate: lModerate: lModerate: lsevere:Forsey I large stones. I large stones. I Larg; "ton.". I slope. I fros! acLion, I large stones.I I I I large stones. I largre stones. illtltl46' 41----- lsevere: lsevere: rsevere: rsevere: rsevere: rsevere:Forsey I s).ope. I slope. j slop". I slope. I slope. I large srones,I | | I I I ;i;;..DLUrIsD,tltlrl48--------- lModerate: i s"r".": I severe: I severe: I severe: lModerate:Fughes I Eoo clayey. I shrink-see.l-1. i-;;;t;-swerr. i "t,.ir.,r-"re1l. I shrink-swe1l, I rarge sr,ones.I I I Iow strengrth. Illtr I I slope. I Illtt50--------- lsevere: rsevere: rsevere: rsevere, isevere: lrurr"..,Goslln lslope. lslope. lsLope, lslope. lslope. lslope.lttttt z(' TABLE 10.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT-_CONtiNUEd SoiI name and map symbol Shal.low excavat ions Dwe1l ings without basements Dwe1l ings with ba sement s SmaIl commercial bui ldings Local roads and streets Latrns and Iandscapi-ng I I8?*: ITrldell---- I Severe;I Severe: slope, I Severe : shrink-swe1J., slope - sIope, depLh to rock. I Moderate : I shrink-swelI, I slope, I Severe : s lope . I Severa : depth to rock, s 1 ope, shrink-swefI - I I I Moderate: I slope. I I I Severe: I slope- I I I Severe: I flooding, I lretness. I I Severe: I depth t,o rock, I slope. I I I ModeraEe: I slope, | .Iarge stones. I Severe : slope. I Seve re : shrink-swe II, slope. I I I Severe: I slope. I I I Severe: I slope, I I I Severe: I flooding. I I I Severe: Severe: slop€ - 88t: Moyerson--------- i Rock outcrop, 8 9--------- MusseI 9 0--------- MuB6el 98,99------ Southace cutbanks slope. cave. Seve re : depLh Eo rock, slope, I Severe: I cut,banks cave - I i Severe: I cutbanks cave. I I slighL---------isriqhr, lslighE_________lModerare:lslisht. s I ope, depth to rock. low strength, s 1ope, shrink-swelI. I frost action. Ill I Moderate: s.l-ope, frosl action. I Severe: I slope. I I i Moderate: I wetness, I f1oodLng. I I Severe: depth to rock, slope - I Mode rate : I sIope, frost ac!ion, shrink-swe1f. I Moderate: low strengt.h, sIope, frost action. I Severe: I slope, I I I Severe : I slope, I I Moderate: I large stones. I I Moderate : I slope, I large st,ones. I I Severe: I slope. I I I I I I Severe: I sIope. I I I I severe: I Severe: sIope. Severe: s lope, thin layer I Moderate : slope. Severe: sIope. I Moderate: wetness , Seve!e: smalI stones, slope. Seve re : ).arge stones, I Moderat e : slope. I I Severe: I large stones, I slope. I I Severe: s1ope. I Severe: droughLy. I Severe: droughty. I Severe: droughLy, slope, 91--------- | Severe:ltussel I cutbanks I slope- I92--------- | Severe:Redrob I cutbanks I wetness. I93--------- Rogrert 94*: I Severe: Showalter-- jModerate: I ModeraLe: slope, I Severe: Cave, I slope. I I I Severe: cave, I flooding. I I I Severe: Morval----- lModerate: s Iope. Showalter-- lsevere: I sIoPe. I IMorval----- lsevere:I sIope. I96---------- lModerate: Southace depth to roek, sIope. too clayey, large st.ones, s Iope, I large stones. I I large siones, I slope, I I large stones. Ilt I uoderaEe: sbrink-swe11, slope, I Sevele : I slope. I I I Severe: I s1ope. I I Moderate: I I Moderate: I s1ope, I Severe: I slope, I I lModerat.e: I slope, I shrink-sweLL. I I I I Severe: I s.Iope. I I I Severe: I slope. I I Moderate: I I Moderate: I sIope. I Severe: Severe: s Iope. I Severe: I sIope. I I I Severe: I sIope. i I Moderate: I large stones. I I Severe: slope. Severe: slope. I large stones. I large stones. 97--------- lModerate; Southace I large stones. I large st.ones.II I Severe : s1ope. See footnot.e at. end of tabfe. slope. 2{ 204 Soil Survey TABLE 1]..--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued SoiL name and map symboJ, Sept ic tank absorpg ion fields Sewage lagroon area s Trench sanitary landfill Area sanitary landfil I Daj-Iy cover for landfill 29* , 30*: Rock outcrop. Dot sero 32--------- Dot se ro 33 *: Earsman---- I slope. I I I stisht---- I I I I Severe: I depth to rock, I s1ope. Severe: seepage, slope. I severe: I seepage, I I I severe: depEh to rock, sLope. I I'Severe: seepage. I Severe: seepage _ I Severe : I seepage, slope. I Severe: I slope, I large stones. I I sligbt---- I Severe: I sIope. I I Severe: flooding, seepage, weLness. I Moderate : I sfope. I I l Moderate : s1ope, too sandy Severe: s lope, Severe: slope- I severe: I seepage, I slope. I I Severe: I seepage. I I I Severe: depth to rock, s1ope. I I Severe: I seepage. I I Severe I I seepage. I I I Severe: seepage, sJ-ope, I Severe : s1ope. slighr----- I Severe : I sIope. I I Severe: flooding, seepage, wetness - Moderate I slope. I Moderate: slope. I Severe: slope. I Severe: I slope. I I I Poor: I slope- I I I Pair: sma1l stones. Poor: area reclaim, sma1I stones, slope. lFair: I smaLl stones. I I Fair: smaLl sCones, slope. I Severe: I seepage, I sIope. I I Severe: I seepage. I I I Severe: seePage, depth to slope, rock, Rock ouLcrop. 3 4 --------- Empedrado 35 --- ------ Empedrado 3 5------- -- Empedrado It I Slight---- lsevere: I Moderate : I slope- I I I Severe: I s1ope. I I I Severe: s1ope. 38--------- lModerate ! Evanst on I percs slowly. I I39, A0, 41----------lsevere: Evan ston I s1ope. I Fluvaquent s r?*. Forelle---- lModerate: I percs slowly, I slope. IBrownsLo--- lModerate:I Severe: s1ope. I seepage. I I Severe : I seepage, I slope. I I Severe : I seepage, I slope. I I Severe: I slope. I I lModeraEe: I seepage, I slope- I I Severe: I slope- I I Severe : seepage, f1ooding. I Severe: I slope. I I seepaqe, slope. I Severe: I sIope. I lSevere:I seepage, I slope. I Poor: s1ope. flooding, wet ne ss, poor filter- I Poor: large stones, s lope . Good. I Poor: slope. I Poor: seepage, too sandy, small sEones. Fair: s1ope. lPoor: smaIl stones. I Poor: s1ope. lPoor: smaIl stones, s1ope. /tn*. Forelle---- lsevere: I slope. IBrownsto--- | Severe: I slope, I I ?(s Aspen-Gypsum Area, Golorado TABLE 11,--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued SolL name and map symbol SepLic tank absorption fields Sewage lagoon areaS Trench sanitary Iandfil I Area sanitary 1andfill Daily cover for landfi.II I I80--------- | Severe: Moen I I 8 1--------- | Severe: Moen 82,83----- lsevere: Monad I slope. I Morval I I85,86----- lsevere: Morval I slope. I8?t: IMorval----- I Severe: I slope. I slope- I l88t: lMoyersp6--- | Severe: Rock outcrop. 89--------- lModerate: Mus se I I Severe: I slope. I slope.tt I Severe: I Severe: I slope. Itl I slope. I ll I Severe : I s1ope. I I I Severe : I sLope. s1ope. Severe: sIope. Severe: slope. Severe: Severe: seepage, depth to rock, slope. Severe: s I ope, large stones. I sLope. I I Severe: I slope, I I I I Severe: I slope. I I I Severe: I slope. I I Severe: I slope. I slope. I I I Severe : I slope. I I Severe: seepage, wetness . I Severe : depth to rock, seepage, slope. I Moderate: I s1ope. I I I sIope. I I Poor: I too clayey, I small stones. I I Poor : I slope. l l I Poor: I slope. I I Poor: I slope. I Good. I I I I Fair: I sIope. I I I Poor : I slope. I I Poor: seepage, too sandy, small stones. I Poor; depth to rock, seepage, smalf stones. I Poor : I t I Severe: I depCh tso rock. I depth to rock, I depth to rock. i depth to rock. I area reclaim. I I I Severe : I I I severe: I I I Poor: I I I Poor: I I I severe:I Severe : depth to rock, I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I area recLaim, slope, I percs slowly, I seepage, I slope.I seepage, I slope. 84--------- lModerate: lModerate: lModerat.e: lsllght-----------lFair: I slope- I ll I peres slowIy. I seepage, I too clayey. I lllTrIdeII---- lSevere: lsevere: lsevere:I poor filter, I seepage, I sl.ope. I Severe: I slope. I I I Severe: I slope. I sIope. I I I Severe: I slope. I I Seve re : I Severe: I depth to rock, seepage. s Iope , I Severe: large stones. sIope, large stones- large stones- I Severe:I severe:I Severe :I Poor: I dept.h to rock, I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I depLh t'o rock. I area reclaim, sIope.slope.sIope.s1ope.hard to pack, sIope. Moderate: lSlight---- iSlighL----* seepage, I II percs slowly. I I depth to rock, s1ope. Severe: percs slowly, tlrt lModerate: lModeraLe:MusseI I percs slowly, I slope. I91--------- I severe; Mus se l I slope. I Redrob wetness, poor f J,lter. seepage. I seepage, flooding, I wetness, wet.ness- I too sandy. I Rogert, 94*: Showalter-- -! ^61 ^J !-L1^ a7 smaII sEones. l:\Land Projects 200512005-35\dwg\2005-35-RMC-site.dwg, 36x24, 1211612005 10:12.27 AM, ADOBE-1 l Xl 7.pc3 I EI { *ie . # ei,'i *;! tt.-. \;la; .,t a9'29'so'' r \i.+. \ -zasz.E .T rcarnt NNct cl iaE =*6 :iJ.J^Hf" IJ Ht:tsfi:E 3 "*iii e 9.t-: fir i3 ri Sx N'o s'c z s3 +9 zz rl-ed sE ,'Or"t'416St-\--I'\ iai ' ... ,;.;: 1^;. ..:. 566 u j.1 -4 1' /D! I :Da> /' ./ .;t :- G, PRIL/M/NARY NOT I'OR CONSTRUCT/ON v =o o PANORAMA RESERVE GARFIELD COUNTY, CO OATE 8f SKI,TCH SITE PLAN Red Mountain Civil, Inc, SKETCH PLAN SUEMISSION Ol.^*ood 5pr inq3, CO bl ?hone: 11o4+5-blt Fo* 31F3+5-1a% emoi l: r ickormclvi l.cm,bb, 2fro-Xt HLlznvu hom by flf PANORAMA RESERVE I ft't ' ,i;.{' : ': -":'''.!'1, I '. Ill-;I IIll LI^ 8 STATtr OF'COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SU RVEY Department of Natural Resources '1313 Sherman Street, Room 715 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 866-2611 Fax: (303) 866-2461 Septembet 24,2006 Mr. Mark Bean Legal: E'/",517, T7S, R87W I)EI'AI{TMENT OF NAIURAL RESOURCES Bill Owens Governor Russell George Executive Director Vincent Matthews Division Director and State Geologist RECEI Garfield County Building and Planning Department P.O. Box 0179 Eagle, CO 81631 Re: Panorama Reserve Subdivision CGS Review No. GA-07-0003 Dear Mark: OcT 1 a ruutj ln response to your request and in accordance with Senate Bill 35 (1972),1 visited the site and reviewed the site plan on September 14,2006. The site consists of 0.71acres of undeveloped land slated for residential. This residential lot will have access to water and sewer services. lncluded in the review package were: a Panorama Reserve Subdivision Preliminary Plan Submittal, prepared by Palomino Design-Build P.C. (6126106 revised); and a Geotechnical Site Review, prepared by H.P. Geotech, lnc. (7/31/06). The site is located in moderately sloping topography to the northeast of Carbondale. Bedrock is mapped in the area as Tertiary Basalt flows underlain by the Pennsylvanian Eagle Valley Evaporite. The primary geologic conditions likely to affect the development plan for this property are: surface drainage, erosion, potentially shallow bedrock, sinkhole potential, and slope considerations. Regional conditions such as radon, seismicity, and water availability may also affect development plans. CGS offers the following suggestions to be incorporatecj into the planning process for the proposed development of this property: 1. Due to the underlying evaporite bedrock, sinkhole potential is a consideration on this property. Sinkhole formation can be induced by property development, excavation of overlying soils and re-routing of surlace drainage. All these items should be carefully considered when developing property in sinkhole-prone terrain. As a precaution, surface drainage should be routed away from any proposed structure. Additionally, foundation plans should incorporate perimeter drains to ensure adequate drainage away from permanent foundation elements. It is important to detail in the plan notes that a potential may exist, on the property, for the formation of sinkholes, prior to, during and following construction activities. The plan notes COLORADO E.lUlAIil.I ,rt / e /ae should also requre a professional geologist or civil engineer, experienced with sinkhole mitigation techniques, to oversee and document any sinkhole repairs made on the site. 2. Site grading should be designed with consideration for increased erosion potential due to changes in stormwater runoff and surface flows. 3. A detailed, lot-specific geotechnical engineering study, including geotechnical-boring advancement, should be conducted on the site to provide a basis for foundation design and engineering. Geotechnical boring samples collected on the site should, at a minimum, analyze parameters related to soil bearing capacity, soil and bedrock composition, depth to bedrock, and bedrock shear strength. Other than the issues mentioned above, there are no geologic conditions present at this site that would preclude the proposed development. lf you have further questions about this site, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303-866-3350. Sincerely, -r/r*, F*.a.ral( 'u / Sean P. Gaffney Engineering Geologist Cc: file STAIE Or COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3581 FAX (303) 866-3s89 www.water.state.co. us February 22,2006 Richard Wheeler Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St Ste 401 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Bill Owens Covernor RECEIVED FEB 2 7 2006 GAFtr ,., ,q urr rl ijC f'pri rviri n,, Re: Panorama Reserve Subdivision Sketch Plan Section 17,T75, R87W,6th PM W. Division 5, W. District 38 Dear Richard. We have reviewed the above-referenced proposal to subdivide a parcel of approxim alely 46.07 acres into three lots, with one single-family dwelling and one agricultural outbuilding on each lot. The applicant proposes to supply water through an existing well. Sewage disposal is to be through individual systems. No water use estimates were provided. Permit No. 91058 was approved on June 16, 1977 , pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3xb)(il) as the only well on a tract of 35 acres. The maximum pumping rate of the well is limited to 1S gpm, the average annual amount to be appropriated is 3 AF, and the uses are limited to domestic purposes in one to three dwellings and livestock watering. The Well Completion and Pump lnstallation Report received for this well indicates that on June 16,1979, the well produced 15 gpm in a bailer test, with the static water level prior to the test at 1g0 feet. The final pumping water level was indicated to be unknown. This testing method may not accurately reflect the current production of the well. We recommend the applicant perform a production test on the wellwith the pump installed to determine the current sustained pumping rate. Based on the above, it is our opinion, pursuant to CRS 30-28-136(1)(h)(l), that the proposed v'iater suppiy wiil rr,rt cause iriateriai injury to ciecreeci water rights, so iong as ihe appiicant maintains a valid well permit. However, due to a lack of information, we are unable to comment on the physical adequacy of the water supply. lf you or the applicant has any questions concerning this matter, please contact Cynthia Love at this office for assistance. Craig M. Lis, Water ResoL CML/CJ L/Panorama Reserve. doc cc: Alan Martellaro, Division Engineer, Division 5 Bill Blakeslee, Water Commissioner, District 38 Russell Ceorge Executive Director Hal D. Simpson, PE State Engineer Sincerely, Water Resource Engineer STATE OF COLORADO Bill Owens, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNIry EMPLOYER Bruce McCloskey, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297 -1 1 92 ForWldlife- For People MAR o 1 2006 8fiff'lF&?88H't'IlFebruary 28,2006 Richard Wheeler Garfield County Planning Department 108 8'n Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Panorama Reserve Subdivision-Sketch plan Dear Mr. Wheeler: The Colorado Division of Wildlife staff has reviewed the request to subdivide 46.06g acres into three tracts. This property is adjacent to land tracts that are already subdivided into similar sized parcels. This area contains several important habitat areas for wildlife, including elk, mule deer, mountain lion, bears and numerous bird species. The property has be-en identified as big game winter range by the Division of Wildlife. Mule deer and elk use this area for resting-, foraging and to move between different habitat areas. Studies have shown that habitat loss, conversion and fragmentation are the most serious issues facing wildlife. The Division of Wildlife, local residents, and wildlife are experiencing problems with dogs running at large and harassing wildlife, especially wintering deer and elk. When elk and deer have to flee from dogs, they use energy stored for winter survival. Although a dead elk/deer is not immediately seen, stress and the energy used fleeing from dogs may Lause their death at the end of winter or eariy spring before they can get the nutrition they need. Pet owners needto be responsible and in control of their pets at all times. Civil and ciiminal penalties are available to the Division of Wildlife if dogs are caught harassing wildlife. We would also recommend that the Homeowners Association actively encourage owners to control their pets and enact penalties for those that don't. lf fencing is necessary, the Division would recommend that it be kept to a minimum and built to facilitate wildlife movements, optimize habitat availability, and reduce wildlife mortality. The Division of Wildlife has a pamphlet available "Fencing with Wildlife in Mind", which hjs acceptable fencing designs for wildlife and livestock. DEPARTME NT OF NATU RAL RESOU RCES, Russell George, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Jeftey Cr:aMord, Chair. Tom Buke, Vicebhair. Ken Tones, Secretary Members, Robert Bray. Rlck -Eptrom . Philip James. Claire O,Neal r Richard Ray. psSsd Shoemaier Ex ffido Members, Russell George and Don Ament ffi RECEIVEN Other wildlife comments include: Black bears - although infrequent, black bears may wander into this area and we would recommended that all trash be stored in a bear-proof trash container, in a centralized locking dumpster or inside a garage so as to prevent conflicts with bears and other wildlife such as skunks and raccoons, The Division has a list of companies providing such containers if needed. Bears and other wildlife are also attracted to pet food left outside, hummingbird feeders, BBQ's and compost piles containing food items' Mountain lions - although rarely seen, mountain lions frequent this area. There are preventive measures that residents can take to reduce the potential for conflicts. Brochures with this information are available through the DOW and should be distributed to all residents and visitors. Lastly, if horses are allowed, we recommend storing hay and grain in a manner that minimizes conflict with the local wildlife. Since deer and elk inhabit and move through this area, haystacks should be enclosed or surrounded by an B foot high mesh fence. Grain should be stored in bear-proof containers. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. lf you need additional information, please contact DWM Kelly Wood at 963-6523. Sincerely, Pat Tucker Area Wildlife Manager Cc: DOW - J.Bredehoft, R.Velarde, K.Wood, file .REDg\Mior\,t,,,it:,i:l',',.,:..1..:H:':,:,:,i11\((\ WRECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 GARFIELD COUNTY Februarf Ol[PlNOd P LAN N I N G FIRE.EMS.RESCUE Richard Wheeler Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RX: Panorama Reserve Subdivision, Sketch Plan Dear Richard: I have reviewed the application for the proposed Panorama Reserve Subdivision. The application was reviewed for compliance with the International Fire Code (lFC) 2003 edition, adopted by the County. I would offer the following comments. Access The proposed access off Panorama Drive appears to be adequate for emergency apparatus. The drawings indicate that turnarounds for emergency vehicles will be provided for each driveway. Turnarounds should comply with IFC Appendix D, Section D103.4. Water Supplies for Fire Protection There are no water supplies proposed for fire protection. Water supplies for fire protection would be limited to water supplied by initially responding fire apparatus with additional supplies provided by water shuttle. Wildfire Hazards The proposed subdivision contains areas with slopes of grass, sage, and gamble oak, which present a wildfire hazard. Defensible spaces and/or fire resistant building construction features should be implemented in these areas. Defensible spaces should follow the recommendations of the Colorado State Forest Service. Impact Fees The development is subject to development impact fees adopted by the District. The developer will be required to enter into an agreement with the District for the payment of development impact fees. Execution of the agreement and payment of the fees are due prior to the recording of the final plat. Fees are based upon the impact fees adopted by the District at the time the agreement is executed. The current fee for residential development is $437.00 per unit. Please contact me if you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance. Sincerelv-6/19tu Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District 300 Meadowood Drive . Carbondale, CO 81623 . 970/963-2491 Fax 963-0569 GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department Review Agency Form Date Sent: February 8,2006 Comments Due: March 1,2006 Name of application: Panorama reserve Subdivision Sent to: Garfield County Road & Bridse Deot. Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notifu the Planning Deparhnent in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline. This form may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to: Garfreld County Building & Planning Staff contact: Richard Wheeler 109 8th Street, Suite 301 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax: 970-384-3470 Phone: 970-945-8212 General Comments: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department has no obiection to the subdivision request with the following provisions. The access to Panorama Loop shall have a curent driveway access permit that meets_ curent driveway access standards. A driveway access permit will be issued upon final_ approval b), the BOCC with conditions specific to the driveway access. A stop sign shall be required at the entrance of the driveway to Panorama Loop. The sign and installation shall be as required in the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffrc Control A 3O-foot easement. if needed. will be deeded to the County from the center line of the Countv road the entire length of the propertv that borders any Countv Road. All fences and stnrctures that encumber the new ROW shall be moved back to the new ROW at the_ sub-dividers expense prior to final plat. Name of review agency: Garfield County Road and Bridge Dept By: Jake B. Mall Date _February 27. 2006 Revised 3/30/00 g2/95/2898 g5:85 7949763 r ASPEN A[4 PAGE. 91 RECEtrVEff," COMMITMENT MAR 0 1 2006 Schedule B-2 (Exceptions)Our Order No, GWZ4L967 ffitl?.ff#lftffiffuffiSffi"ro exceptions to the rouowing unress the ssme are dirposed 13' RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS ORANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.BY JAMES SALTER ET AL BY DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 19, I9?7 IN BOOK 50] ATPAGB 802. 14. SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS AND CHARGHS OF THE PANORAMA RANCHES HOMEOWNERSOR WATER USERS ASSOCIATION GOVERNING THE USE OF DOMESTIC WATER AS SETFORTH IN THE DEED TO JAMES SALTER ET AL. RECORDED JUNE 23, I98O IN BOOK550 AT PAGE 483. 15. TERMS. CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ACCESSEASEMENT AS REFERRED TO IN SPBCIAL WARRANTY DBED RECORDED JUNE 26, 1997 INBOOK 1023 AT PAGE 633, AND AT PAGB 638. 16' EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANAI"S,PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. 17. ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCY DUE TO THE LOCATION OF FENCE LINES AND THE EFFECTOF ANY RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST THAT MAY BE CLAIMED DUE TO ANY SAID DISCREPANCY. lo R,'.f,^;J Fr....- [o,,-^ o ({-, S f.. cr, r,^*- + ' I l,* c< p--*f l.c)'r- + k^- ,-L^ f.I^"^ It o)' flr,ir ?'"f.-+)J \e"t 82/9.5/2086 05:05 704876?ASPEN AM PAGE g2 LEGAL DESCITTPTIOiT lJ,'"lI"lYf;Hill,ytff_.fi #1;H.fjlfr,:,,,#ffi.gfi oundrrrrna A prrcol of lrnd sittnrod, ji {ro..f f n of Soction lt, T-oynlhb 7 Sourh. Renge E7I':i!ll,',Hi?#H,? r-l-o* bd"s;H o'rrr,c ruonh-so*rh csnrirri,ro or wry. *id **r;ffi",IhTff;Hffi_Ir, or*.yii"" "i"ffi;ffi rishr or Bcgianing rt r pohr on tI ["i,',t1,ffi *llrurisl"tl,H['i]"fi'#'.'il;1,'H;l:li"il'" drsrcaer j,4orw,;r-r:#iH,-.:"T jl,fi ilJlll'*.1:f :;rir'#j*j,i,T", fiI\:ilT.?:ril,trHr;,.f i,:st*1,r,*t[:1.,1..;utffrighr, hrvi$s i ndiur or cm,ii iii.i""ffia'lr'rlro bcgs; N. 77 ita$*sjtzz" Ett '14 fc..; rhcnco N' sr dG*r:p zsni-E;iii't: ,hcn.. 7t.E7 toor rrons rhc rrc orrHitJllli,XtT#Xlll t{t'"r zro.ci r,", 'r-ri chora "rwniorr,crir: il ir aus,oo,.,ri,"oril?.;iil,]ff H,li-;l#ir',iH:T.Ji:il j.#i,t, ;H,ffi:thcnce N' 78 d*rxr rzlr,r s-oii siffidri. i1 ta foa rrong rhe uc ofr curvc r,rthc right, hryinl r ndiur of ,.ol;i?*, tt"'li".iti*ni" boe',: irt tz degrca 0J.29,E, t75.zt f;at; thansc S, 03 dogrua i;Ui;;Wl#_feotl rDcrrc4j9.t6 fcct atoq3 rhcnrc of r curvo ro rt* ridrt. rt rirg " rJir* oi'iir"ri*,, thc crrord of ,ryhich b*rs: s 3tdEBrcGe 4J'02' w {10.4 t frcri il".ir}b.c{?; .tog ,h. *c of r +urvc ro rhe tcft.hrving e rrdiux 6; tr+.rz rca,_rha *"rl "i*iili'ilo, s, r? dogrc+r {z,ri, w. r6{,etfca; thcnca 133.62 f.il et-rF oro of . clrr" io t,E hrvinS r ^diur of 26i ?t foct.thc chond of wNch baru S. ir ocgrcc. r6,i6,'i. J fr- , + fcci: ahcocc S. 50 degr*r S4,fi),,E' 7' 16 foa; rlrcncc lt o oz.r.a-.r-oq rr,. "i "ii .r*. to rhc right, hrviq r rrdiur ofe74 20 fccr. rhc chord of wtrtuh bari: s l'iiliHlt,oo" E 3o.r.j6 ftf,t; rhcnr:a trJ.0llict rlong the uc of r curvlg-l!!f,, f..raf Iffi* of t006.4o fttr, rhc chord of *$*r+:uil,,H,#rli#.ffi ,fd.f,degrurr lZ'lZ'W. lll.fil ofbcaiunins. contrinins;T*tH::.*' {tTdcgr*r4l'27'w rios ri'rooiiir,"x,int County of Crrfsld. Srrrr of Colorrdo Said Ar:co* urd (Jtility fu::l ir rhiny fccr widc lying fifl".n fccr on erch ridc *f rhcctnttrlinc of ut oxirting drivwry bciru rnorl nrniculrrly dsrcribod u follows: lt!#ryilllill!!#,utflll'$'ll$lr,llrur Erhtblt B-l Gcorgc C- and Kim Gerringer Due Difte.nce for Missosri Heights hoptrt,v Januarj,2?, 199& Page + In paragraph 14 of Schcdule B-2 of the Title Commihent, rcference is urade to the .,Regulations and Charges of the Panorama Ranches Homeowners or \Vatea-Users Association." 'We rveri not provided and have oo1 pviewed any documents related to tle Panorama Ranches' Homeorvners or Water Users Associatiorq but the Associarioru nray encumber the subject properfy. However. since you wi-ll be using a domestic well to serve your lot, we believe you should n<lt be subject to tle regulations and charges of the Panorama Ranches Homeorvners or Watcr Lisers esiociation. Accordingly, Seller should have the Title company deiete paragraph 14 of Schedule B-2 in its entiretY- Access and Iitilit-v Easemcnt Fmm otn review \r'e have determined that you will have a suffisient acces#trtility easement to serve the properry. We exaurined: i) the Special Warra:rty Deed. dated June 24,7997, betrveen Pipc Drearn Enterprises, Grantor, and Pipe Dream Entelprises, Grantee I; 2) the Improvement Survcy, dated January 20., i 998, prepared by Lines in Space Land Surveys: and 3) a survey of "The Reserve" zubdivision, dated AugUst 29,7997,prepared by Lines in Space l-and Surveys' From our examination of these documEn6, copies of rvhich are attached. &ccess and utilit-v ser'ico to your properLy* is provided by a thirfy (30) foot easo:rnent which begins c)n the Westerl;- side of panorama Drive, rarerses Lots 2 and 3 0f "The Resewe" Subdivisiou and provides access at the Northern boundary of the subject properly. The easement is described only as an access easement on the Improvement Survey, bui *as Deeded as ail. access and utility easement irr the Speciai Waranr;,* beed meotion"d ubou". Therefore, an access aad utility- easernent resuits. The easement does not take the most direct route from Panoramal)rive' but rather winds its \lxay across the tfl,o other lots to the subjeot property. construction costs for an access road and to install utilities rvill likety be substantial. At the very least, a Quit Claim Deed should be executed conveying the easementio yo* However, w'e recofiImerid the easemeut be conveyed as part of thE subject properry in the Gener-al Warranty Deed. Locared st Book t0?3 and Page 633, Qarffeld County Cierli strd Rscorder's Office- 3:7L 3 \7t, t Lt ?b OLb lwrt -5.rr ryJ q e,( r) rrwt'a tS. Y., t. t ) q?i\ --- o ).r )[/\rr/ m A$tno:l o'rtlJuut 06'&t 0 e6'31 I e $o € cuo0E'lB W &xzd tE0I€ drriEE 8B6l/@Z/e6 E093lE r[[l flil Bllfrfi lll lffill llllll lflffi elgffi BHllfr& llffi lilffil I - Ar ,4l19roaracp,.0Lg1-q-l1d pftp r.{roa-Fg.i.,trro, O, *r*r Sf,ti#lp;r.1o [ngomq 4aflrrog cqr uo;riftiirJo tuicd cqr ;i .oi.tii'i,rggpg -r;r#i €z s mcq TrFt$Jo ?lq?cn.rcJ tr.tol Jo rntrut tura${ qtipjir-or lrure r;o ariour tuop rcq m'r rf rar qr :pei slii a "iiio dirmp dtil{, :ilj3s'ss !r r6[.parufop-gy g ryro! .prrrf,Jo prorp crtitoqil'gpr io r4ir.r r nry^q"url err or ciln,rJo ur ap tuqr fq, sr-6! corratr :peJ ee 'toi.t.iiii ciiep az i ,o&l :rx, os.6cts .et c mftp 0r,! S!,tos,^so mo,qi i'$liiii p.or cii-"iir; ht , iir "rior rArrurrJo u a0 fo11r r.f Of '6t *,rqr:rql e t,at l.,n.r,aei'er*ci ri;d;,i;:l'q, 05'et rtl.?agt railry}r g rlrq rpgrip prortf or0 .rs, l].8tJo rnlprr r &rpqy"!.ltolcrun rf o!qrAroFrq, tZ.lS.auctll:lrr{,r,fif A,f .iiggaiaCcp g9 Fr,Icq {otrN^rJo prolo eqr .|9cJ rr.gzr.,o rn!ry, c Eurrr{ Ucr *i oi ;il;;i; "r" "ti s,iorlcq, €6'zsl qlrn:ttqr!?'l! rtt .tr,zt t c.rlcp pn uto{ qjgato proqj orp ,nd ru.osJo rnipur tu.t^!q qqr qr or o,r,mr r3o cn'ei1r ni"q r$;.ii ,Iilil,,rq 9t.6?! Al."cc.6troatfipt9Noda_gtllrJ6t.s0t tdl.1s,pgtc*.bl;sN;fi-ffi,rAJop.rortentr'toqr l' tA t Jo to,plr r ftlarg qtp u1l or crunc i l" an nil Auii. *j e i :i6 oruorit :looJE9't6l At F9l.6t ricdrp i9 g fiucqt :rcrU lC.ggt A r61,trtr *roJriop Oi S Bnoq qel{rrr Jo Prorlo cq 'ro3 6t'r?l;o aqpu r 8u[tq U!,t-o,{r nr o^mc rJo 3Js 0q! $uop ee.6 65.901eflR$,JorJ Lg.LU,1 ,Zt,)3 euecp 99 N elrqt:pof fp.tf ,tf .tO,og rcergcp rlg N rr"oq qrytirJo pJo{r^or$'!ooJ rt'il | Jo anlpar u hrlerq iqirr iqr'il'o^r,x, BJo 3r8 aqr&T ,tql t6'tr.oruein :FoJ grrccr ,lr ,ic,ss';..aop pc ij ir*qi',*j ie .ro /rt .$0,62rrarttep o, N rr'oq q5$^rJopJoqr aqi;s.;t'--.r,gJo inlF'l r 'ulrrq 001 gqt ot '^rn? eJo' 'rd rqr Suop rog sz.c6 couirrr :ro$ ie.tsi li .rize oci.irap r i ru'"ioiq i"s{i^a Jo pror,r,,or{s 'loal 6[.r6Jo rqrr ! gqurq rqgp *r ur a,*rru BJs cr6.orlt suolu nq q[.6, | Bcu3qt:!ta.f^00 e9l ,ll.lp,gl er.fiop g9 g {r*roayp &rprpo p*r.,n *gniuco o'ql uuogu a.rucrlr:eeoj {,{,.16o8 ftt 6g1.9Us0a 8sp 63 g uiq-gt uol$ro$ puoJo teuro3 retr{n& rirnos, Brlt rlrlgr ulo{ 0618 ,trcl ts.gc e "gg,g1 roorgap co s .ri"q riana p$ 3o ru;od epunt€oi't' 'q'qrBfl {r |Pr{ffi uory dean-30,lgu raor rcoJ 69 grr.10 u.r13 xaar-J0.irtrsp {1.rortrr616r{r pn6 pand poqxoop , of, oqr3o &epundq;Gi;ra .,,,1; *; c aa gu1uu1gog ;6.rA0lloJ f? peqpcsop {prqnslurd orou Fumq {r^reAgp Surlrrxe uE J(J rulprlras ai{iJ$ apB q$r0 so too.! u?aUB Surtr1 rpuil ra3 Augl sl :uru:as8g ,{r{tttt pur $rernv prg .di*l /qffi"ot^t* ,,9,, lIgIHXl a 02/05/ZOOE 84:52 7g4175a ASPEN AM PAGE 83 I a2/45/2A06 7A4076a READYTO BUILD NOW! 8630,000 Tnp PeNontan DruuB MISSoURI HnrcUrs CtruorrmelE, CoLoMoo I I 623 Tun oanunruL 46 ecno RANCH ptriopfrRly HAS DRop DEAD ytEWS or Mouxr Soprus .qNo THr ELx Moutrnw Ranot rnou SUNUGHT ro Aspfn. ENJoy rHE BEr'tEFrrs oF A t?AyFD couNTy RzAD, wfiu, IN PUCE AND IRRIGATIqN WATER, LAcmTn JI]ST AB?VE THE STRANG ILnNcn )NLY 5,2 MILE| FR1M utcttw,tr 82 MAKas FoRAN E4sy solurloN N ptutNNlfic youRcETAt{Ay. Aspnx Ili ,t l'205 Souru Mu Srnesr ASPEN, CO 816l I 970t920-2o06 (O) 888/5 50-58 37 (T cstt FnEE) e70l925-3531 (Fex) asp6:@RoF.urr 1E-Man.) WWW.ASPENEXPER]'S.COM Rm.tr STATE l.r. CovTPANY ,Y ASPEN AM PAGE 02 :-site.dwg, 36x24,1!9120O6 2:09:31 PM, ADOBE-1 1X17.pc3 () *rrl NcA t5 $Hs =iRIZ qi ox 3E F- ht rG Td\i E'ufr \rdl).l(, {o,l/ I _s iY*N U) i/"iE*o *-l f-" /^\>Yz; Ern ff{&tsxffi.*:t{ C €q i:J '.--t \.:>- oEHtdol,q b' \--:, \).)j> l\. (r ..)':'