HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 04.11 Raptor Survey ReportHIGH MESA 16-INCH DISCHARGE PIPELINE
Raptor Survey Report
Garfield County, Colorado
Cover: Representative view of suitable raptor nesting habitat in the project area.
Prepared for:
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
Prepared by:
WestWater Engineering
2516 Foresight Circle #1
Grand Junction, CO 81505
Apri12011
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
At the request ofEnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. (EnCana), WestWater Engineering
(WWE) conducted a raptor survey update for the proposed High Mesa I 6-inch discharge
pipeline. The proposed alignment is located in Sections 35 and 36 T7S R96W and
Sections 2 and 3 T8S R96W, 6th Principal Meridian. This area is located south of the
Colorado River between the towns of Parachute and De Beque, Colorado (Figurel-
inset).
The proposed alignment generally follows an existing pipeline corridor between Wallace
Creek Road (Garfield County Road 306) and a compressor station on the western edge of
High Mesa. Access to the project area is currently available via Stone Quarry Road
(Garfield County Rd. 300) from U.S. Highway 6. The current primary uses of the area
surrounding the proposed alignment are rural residential sites, pasture and rangeland,
wildlife habitat, and natural resource extraction including natural gas development.
1.2 General Survey Information
Information used in the preparation of this report was gathered by WWE biologists
during 20 II field surveys and previous raptor surveys and observations within the
general area of the proposed pipeline. Raptor survey boundaries evaluated for this report
are shown in Figure I.
The purpose of the surveys was to identify raptor nest locations and occupancy status
within the project area and that could potentially be impacted by project development.
This report provides written documentation that describes survey findings as well as
recommended mitigation measures.
2.0 LANDSCAPE SETTING
2.1 Vegetation and climate
Natural vegetation communities around the project area have been affected by residential
development, agriculture, fire, livestock grazing, and natural gas developments.
Native vegetation in the project area consists of pinyon-juniper woodlands (Pinus edulis
and Juniperus osteosperma) accompanied by big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata),
Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii), and serviceberry (Amalanchier alnifolia). Other
common native plants include broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), Fremont
cottonwood (Populusfremontii), Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides), kingcup
cactus (Echinocereus triglochidiatus), narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia),
prickly pear cactus (Opuntia spp.), yucca (Spanish bayonnet) (Yucca harrimaniae), three-
leaf sumac (Rhus trilobata), wavyleafthistle (Cirsium undulatum), and yellow
rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus). Common non-native plants included dryland
alfalfa (Medicago sativa), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), yellow salsify (Tragopogon
dubius), yellow sweet-clover (Melilotus officina/is), and several introduced grasses
including downy brome (Bromus tecto rum).
The climate for the Colorado River Valley in the project area is considered semi-arid with
a wide range of annual temperatures and precipitation. The average annual precipitation
WestWater Engineering Page I of9 April2011
in the region ranges between 12 and 15 inches, and temperatures range from about 95
degrees F in the summer months to -10 degrees F during the winter months.
2.2 Terrain
The project area lies south of the Colorado River near Una on U.S. Highway 6. Terrain
at the site is moderately sloping to the Colorado River. The proposed alignment is
crossed by three named streams (Wallace Creek, Spring Creek, and Pete and Bill Creek)
and several unnamed drainages that flow to the north. The proposed alignment
terminates on the western edge of High Mesa. Elevation at the site varies from
approximately 5,225 feet above sea level at Wallace Creek, to approximately 6,250 feet
above sea level on High Mesa.
3.0 RAPTOR SURVEYS
3.1 Background Information and Survey Methods
A list of Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) published by the USFWS through a
Memorandum of Understanding with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the
U.S. Forest Service (USFS) was reviewed (USFWS 2008). Western Colorado is included
in Bird Conservation Region (BCR) 16 as mapped by the USFWS. Several BCC raptor
species included in the list for Region 16 occur regularly in Colorado, although some are
present only as seasonal migrants. Avian literature sources such as the "Birds of Western
Colorado Plateau and Mesa Country" (Righter et al. 2004) and the "Colorado Breeding
Bird Atlas" (Kingery 1998) were reviewed to determine the likelihood for species
occurrence within the project area. Bird identification and taxonomic nomenclature are
in accordance with that applied by the Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas Project (Kingery
1998).
A preliminary review of the project area, using aerial photographs, was conducted to
familiarize personnel with vegetation types and terrain and as an aid to help determine
potential raptor nesting habitat. Field data, including general project location,
boundaries, and reported features, were verified and/or recorded with the aid of a
handheld global positioning system (GPS) receiver utilizing NAD83 map datum, with all
coordinate locations based on the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate
system within Zone 12.
Pedestrian surveys were conducted April 18, 20, and 21, 2011 to identify and locate
raptor nests. Visual searches for raptor and other bird species nests were focused on the
pinyon-juniper woodlands and riparian areas within the survey area. In addition to a
visual search for tree nests, Great Homed Owl calls were broadcast at approximately 200
meter intervals throughout the survey area using FoxPro® NX3 wildlife calls. This call-
playback methodology has been shown to elicit a response from nesting raptors in the
area, particularly members of the Genera Accipiter and Buteo (Kennedy and Stahlecker
1993; Reynolds et.al. 1992). Nest searches and bird identification were aided with the
use of binoculars and call recognition, where needed.
WestWater Engineering Page 2 of9 April2011
4.0 RESULTS OF SURVEY
4.1 Raptors
Several raptor species nest, reside, forage, or pass through the general area of the
proposed pipeline and are included in Table I. Five of these species are included on the
Federal BCC list.
American Falco Coniferous and deciduous forests and open
Kestrel sparverius N terrain with suitable perches. Nests in cavities
in trees, cliffs and buildings.
American Falco High cliffs near pinyon-juniper, ponderosa, or
Peregrine peregrines y spruce-fir forests. Elevations from 4,500 to
Falcon annatum over 9,000 ft.
Nest in mature cottonwoods or large pines
Haliaeetus usually near large rivers or other bod1es of
Bald Eagle leucocephalu y water. Winters m a variety of habitats and
may be far from water feeding on carrion s from road or winter kills. Elevation 4,400 to
8,500 ft. for nesting.
Cooper's Accipiter Cottonwood riparian to spruce/fir forests,
Hawk cooperii N including pifiollljuniper woodlands. Nests
most frequently m pmes and
Grasslands, shrub lands, agricultural areas,
Golden Eagle Aquila y pifion-juniper woodlands, and Ronderosa
chrysaetos forests. Prefers nest sites on c iffs and
sometimes in trees in rugged areas.
Great Horned Bubo Occupies diverse
Owl virginianus N deciduous and
adjacent open
Flammulated Otus jlameolus y montane evergreen forests with available
Owl cavities. Elevations 6,000 to I 0,000 ft.
Long-eared
Occupies mixed shrublands. Nests and roost
Asio otus N in sites in dense cottonwoods, willows, scrub
Owl oak, ;,unipers and dense forest of mixed
coni ers and aspens.
Grassland, shrubland, agricultural areas, and
Northern marshes. Nests in areas with abundant cover
Harrier Circus cyaneus N ( eJ, tall reeds, cattails, grasses) in grasslands
an marshes. Also known to nest in high-
elevation sagebrush.
Glaucidium
Nests in tree cavitites in open coniferous
Northern woodlands in a broad elevation ran8e.
Pygmy Owl gnoma N Requires open areas for hunting an does not
occufJy large expanses of continuous
woo lands.
West Water Engineering Page 3 of9 April2011
Northern Saw-Aegolius Nests in tree cavities in all types of forests,
whet Owl acadicus N includin,g pinyon-juniper woodands. May
also utilize man-made nest boxes.
Nest on cliffs near open habitats such as
Falco grasslands and shrub lands. Year-round
Prairie Falcon mexicanus y resident of Colorado. Elevation generally
below 10,000 feet, but occasionally above
timberline.
Diverse habitats including ~asslands, Jlifion-
Red-tailed Buteo juniper woodlands and dectduous, comferous
Hawk jamaicensis N and riparian forests. Nests in mature trees
(especially cottonwood, aspen, and pines) and
on cliffs and utility poles.
Sharp-shinned
High densi7c young, or even-aged, stands of
Accipiter N coniferous orest and deciduous forests of
Hawk striatus aspen or oak brush with small stands of
conifers.
Swainson's Buteo N Arid grassland, desert, and aficultural areas
Hawk swainsoni with scattered trees and shru s.
Western Otus Nests in cavities in deciduous trees in rrearian
Screech Owl kennecottii N corridors, and open conifer forests to a esser
extent.
Results: No occupied raptor nests were observed in the approximately 712 acres of
raptor nesting habitat that was surveyed. Two raptor nests discovered in 20 I 0 were
revisited to determine their 2011 occupancy status; neither nest was occupied. Six
additional unoccupied potential raptor nests were located during the survey. These nests
are similar in shape and size to nests built by Accipiters (Cooper's Hawk and Sharp-
shinned Hawk), but are difficult to distinguish from nests built by Corvids (specifically
Common Raven and American Crow). Common Ravens were observed nesting within
the survey area. Nest locations are available in Table 2.
UNHA-1 12 751528 4364402 UNHA No sign of occupancy in 20 II.
or Corvid nest.
UNHA-2 12 751587 4363174 UNHA No sign of occupancy in 20 II.
or Corvid nest.
UNHA-3 12 752292 4364009 UNHA No sign of occupancy in 2011.
or Corvid nest.
UNHA-4 12 752635 4364444 UNHA No occupancy 2011.
or Corvid nest.
WestWater Engineering Page 4 of9 April2011
UNHA-5 12 752944 4364130 UNHA
UNHA-6 12 753269 4364295 UNHA
UNHA-7 12 753374 4364101 UNHA
* COHA~ Cooper's Hawk; UNHA~Unknown Hawk Species
American Kestrel, Cooper's Hawk, and Red-tailed Hawk were observed in several
locations along the proposed alignment. Based on behavioral observations of these
individuals, it is unlikely that the birds observed are nesting within the survey area.
4.2 Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) other than rap tors
In addition to the raptors discussed above, WWE biologists documented the presence of
BCC (songbirds) and their habitat. BCC habitat and nesting records, as described in the
Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas (Kingery 1998), Colorado Birds (Andrews and Righter
1992), and Birds of Western Colorado Plateau and Mesa Country (Righter eta!. 2004) in
the vicinity of the project area are summarized in Table 3.
Results: Juniper Titmouse and Pinyon Jays were observed in pinyon-juniper woodlands
between Wallace and Spring Creeks and on High Mesa. No nests were discovered.
There is adequate sagebrush habitat for Brewer's Sparrows in the project area but none
were observed.
In addition to raptors and BCC, the following bird species were observed in or near the
project area: American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila
caerulea), Chipping Sparrow (Spizella passerina), Common Raven (Corvus corax),
Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura), Plumbeous Vireo (Vireo plumbeus), Red-winged
Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), Rock Wren (Salpinctes obsoletus), Spotted Towhee
(Pipilo maculatus), and White-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis).
5.0 EFFECTS TO WILDLIFE
5.1 Wildlife Impact Assessment
Construction of the pipeline will affect on-site native vegetation and wildlife habitat,
although much of the proposed alignment lies within or adjacent to an existing pipeline
corridor that has been previously disturbed and reclaimed. Locating the pipeline within
and adjacent to an existing pipeline lessens the potential effects to wildlife. The primary
WestWater Engineering Page 5 of9 April2011
effects would be habitat alteration and displacement of individuals through disturbances
related to increased development.
5.1.1 Birds
Raptors: o raptor nests are in danger of direct removal. At the time of the raptor
survey no occupied raptor nests were discovered, and therefore there would be no
expected effects to nesting raptors from the project construction. If construction is
delayed it is possible that raptors may still select nest sites within the project area survey
boundaries. These newly established raptor nests may be affected by disturbance
associated with the proposed project and if project completion is delayed, the area should
be resurveyed by qualified biologists.
Passerine Species: The affects to foraging and nesting habitat to a small number of bird
species is expected to be minimal. Vegetation that will be removed from the site is not
unique and loss of habitat will not affect overall passerine populations.
6.0 MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations for mitigation are presented for maintenance and
improvement of wildlife habitat, quality, and prevention of human-caused impacts to
resources.
6.1 Maintenance and Restoration of Habitat
Reclamation plans should include efforts to restore the native vegetation communities
once construction is complete in the project area. Reclamation recommendations are
found in the "Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Plan (IVNWMP),
High Mesa 16-Inch Discharge Pipeline" (WWE 201 0) which contains a recommended
seed mixture for reclamation of the disturbed areas. If properly applied, this seed mixture
will benefit all wildlife populations in the area . The IVNWMP also recommends ongoing
control of noxious weeds which will aid the establishment of desired vegetation in the
reclaimed area benefiting all wildlife species in the area.
6.2 Planning for Sensitive Time Periods and Areas
6.2.1 Raptors
Pipeline construction activities within the project area are unlikely to affect rap tor
population . If construction is delayed the area should be resurveyed to ensure no new
raptor nests have been built that may be affected by the project. If occupied nests are
then discovered, the potential for possible effects to raptors could be reduced by
scheduling construction activities so there is no interference with breeding, nesting, and
brood rearing activities of the species occupying the new nest sites.
If occupied nests are discovered during subsequent surveys, WWE recommends temporal
and spatial restriction guidelines for construction activities near active nests based on
BLM stipulations (BLM 1987), Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW)
recommendations (Craig 2002 and Klute 2008) and literature review of nesting season
timing for raptors in the Roan Plateau region (Andrews and Righter 1992, Kingery 1998).
These recommendations are summarized in Table 4 .
WestWater Engineering Page 6 of9 April2011
*Great
6.2.2 Migratory Birds
In order to comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act by showing a good faith effort to
reduce potential impacts on nesting birds, any brush/tree clearing at the project site
should take place outside of the nesting season. Nesting season for migratory birds is
generally considered to occur between May 15 and July 31 in this area for most species.
June I to July 15 is the peak period when most incubation and brood rearing takes place.
If brush/tree clearing can occur prior to nesting, most affected birds will relocate to
alternate nesting sites. After mid-to-late July, most fledging has occurred and brush/tree
clearing impacts would be minimized.
WestWater Engineering Page 7 of9 April2011
season.
7.0 REFERENCES
Andrews, R., and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado Birds: A Reference to Their Distribution
and Habitat. Denver Museum of Natural History, Colorado.
BLM. 1987. Grand Junction Resource Area Resource Management Plan and Record of
Decision. Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Grand
Junction.
Craig, Gerald R. 2002. Recommended Buffer Zones and Seasonal Restrictions for
Colorado Raptors. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver.
Kennedy, P. L., and D. W. Stahlecker.l993. Responsiveness of nesting northern
goshawks to taped broadcasts of3 conspecific calls. Journal of Wildlife
Management, 57:249-257.
Kingery, H. E. 1998. Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership,
Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver.
Klute, D. 2008. Recommended Buffer Zones and Seasonal Restrictions for Colorado
Raptors. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver.
Reynolds, R. T., R. T. Graham, M. H. Reiser, R. L. Bassett, P. L. Kennedy, D. A. Boyce
Jr., G. Goodwin, R. Smith and E. L Fisher. 1992. Management recommendations
for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. General Technical
Report RM-GTR-217, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Righter, R., R. Levad, C. Dexter, and K. Potter. 2004. Birds of Western Colorado Plateau
and Mesa Country. Grand Valley Audubon Society, Grand Junction, Colorado.
USFWS. 2008. Birds of Conservation Concern 2008. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Division of Migratory Bird Management, Arlington, Virginia.
WWE. 2010. WestWater Engineering. Integrated Vegetation and Noxious Weed
Management Plan. High Mesa 16-inch Discharge Pipeline, Garfield County,
Colorado. June, 2010.
WestWater Engineering Page 8 of9 April2011
* Unoccupied Rap tor Nests
-High Mesa 16" Discharge
D 1/4 Mile Raptor Survey Buffer
L]BLM
High Mesa 16ia Discharge Pipeliae
Biologkal Sarvey
Locatio• aad Raptors
.n '\Nest Water Engineering
-:;;; Comulling Eng~rs & Scientist>
0 1,000
Feet
April 2011
2,000
...