Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationGARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 MAR 0 6 2006 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 G4F,,,„ Telephone: www Barfield county $om 212 Facsimile�'i��Pi A QNN Y • RECEIVED Subdivision Application Form GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) ➢ Subdivision Name: Man1c-K.7-Oa..) iV%eoo - s St -k p i sr• ^� ➢ Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types): Sketch Plan Li Preliminary Plan Final Plat D. Name of Property Owner (Applicant): ➢ Address: +110 -12-40 Z13 Telephone: 570.5'64 • 3gisv D. City: &fcw C.ASI L, State: Cc. Zip Code: '6/01 FAX: ➢ Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc): Ta'yNC'r '. ➢ Address: /1 2.- c) AL) E Telephone: qi5. 236/ ➢ City: 6'71-1r-Soks State: C2) Zip Code:` / ► FAX: ➢ Name of Engineer: ➢ Address: Telephone: ➢ City: State: Zip Code: FAX: ➢ Name of Surveyor: 42>i-sio— ➢ Address:2 i c.i - 74-s ._ /x}'1'13 C2 21 Telephone: folo • 5 �7 Y City: S - V State: Co Zip Code: FAX: ➢ Name of Planner: AA voss /1I,u "--re. am..-� s , LA- • Address:Tx.K SE, Telephone: 0837 ➢ City: Sv(-Ls State: Zip Code: `bI602,FAX: GENERAL INFORMATION continued... ➢ Location of Property: Section 35-k 30 Township 4-s Range q( w ➢ Practical Location / Address of Property: q-/(0 Cit 2-1(3 I\jE M.) (A14 )> Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres): S- 3. 9* p(-0-t s ➢ Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision: --/T-4-2t-re: (.3) ➢ Property Current Land Use Designation: 1. Property's Current Zone District: A1-"12-/l2-P 2. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Owri.- .'(N (-, `72e-s( ocw -r-.AL. Proposed Utility Service: ➢ Proposed Water Source: (N 0( vi r , L., We-i-LS > (See "Attachment C" to be completed with the Preliminary Plan Application) )=. Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: / SDS ➢ Proposed Public Access VIA: Co,,/-rrV .-2(,),t, i, 243 ➢ Easements: Utility: As "it-c e-ss4-e--)' Ditch: 1&.s A/t;S s IA- Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below): Total (1) Residential Units / Lots Size (Acres) Parking Provided Single -Family 4 t 6.53//b .%/74.43 As - 4v to c 2 Duplex N /A Multi-Family A.1/4 Mobile Home /k1 /A Total 4/ - 3/S3,c(11.. Floor Area (sa. ft.) Size (Acres) Parking Provided (2) Commercial /A N (3) Industrial `A /j (4) Public / Quasi-Public //it N (5) Open Space / Common Area / Total ➢ Base Fee: Sketch Plan - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200; Plat Review Fee 2 • • I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and 3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following address: http://www.garfield-county.com/buildinq and planning/index.htm A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this application form. 4. Process / Public Meeting The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been 3 • • scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant. At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1 -year from the meeting date before the Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to the Planning Department within the 1 -year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a Preliminary Plan review. B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as well as other state and local referral agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the process that will either approve or deny the application request. 4 • • 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to 4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC which is addressed in Sections 4:20 — 4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations. 4. Process / Public Hearings The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-making entities during public hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC. In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the 5 • • applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant prior to the public hearings. As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is responsible for making a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval, or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final Plat Review. C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during the Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will 6 • • sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County's subdivision process. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the Preliminary Plan review process. 4. Process The Final Plat review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or meeting and therefore does not require public notice.) If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department 7 • • and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat. Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process. Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of the applicant to complete the Final Plat process. Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations or access them on-line at: http://www.garfield-countv.com/buildinq and planninq/index.htm in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review, and Final Plat Review. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which icorrect and accurate to the best of my knowledge. (Signature of applicant/owner) Last Revised: 07/25/2005 8 Date 5 March 2006 Mr. Mark Bean, Director Garfield County Building and Planning 108 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Via: Hand Delivery Eric D. McCafferty, President Compass Mountain Land Use, LLC Post Office Box 86 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 tele: 970.618.0837 fax: 970.945.2274 compass@sopris.net RE: Monckton Meadows Sketch Plan Application Dear Mark, Please accept the attached Sketch Plan application information and supporting documents for Monckton Meadows Subdivision. Also attached is the requisite application review fee. I have included three review copies of the sketch plan application for the use of your staff in their evaluation of completeness. If you or your staff require any additional information for this submittal, please contact me. Upon a finding that the application is technically complete, I will be happy to provide you with as many review copies as are necessary. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at your convenience. Regards, C-ZLC Eric D. McCafferty President ATTACHMENT C Page 11 FORM NO. GWS -76 0212005 Phone - Info Section 30-28-133,(d). sufficient in terms WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION SUMMARY STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1313 Sherman St., Room 818, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3587 Main (303) 856-3581 Fax (303) 866-3589 C.R.S. requires that the applicant submit to the County, "Adequate of quantity, quality, and dependability will be available to ensure an adequate http://www.water.state.co.us evidence that a water supply that In supply of water." 1. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT AS PROPOSED: 2. LAND USE ACTION: 3. NAME OF EXISTING PARCEL AS RECORDED: SUBDIVISION: , FILING (UNIT) , BLOCK LOT 4. TOTAL ACREAGE: , 15. NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED PLAT MAP ENCLOSED? ❑ YES or ❑ NO copies of deeds, plats. or other evidence or documentation. _6. PARCEL HISTORY - Please attach A. Was parcel recorded with county prior to June 1, 1972? 0 YES B. Has the parcel ever been part of a division of land action since If yes, describe the previous action: or ❑ NO June 1, 1972? ■ YES or ■ NO 7. LOCATION OF PARCEL - Include a map delineating the project area and tie to a section corner. 1/4 of the 1/4, Section , Township ■ N or ■ S, Range ■ E or ■ W Easting: Principal Meridian: Optional GPS must be meters, ■Sixth ❑New Mexico ❑Ute ■Costilla Format must be UTM, Units N, ❑ Zone 12 or ■ Zone 13 Location: GPS Unit must use the following settings: Datum must be NAD83, Unit must be set to true Northing: 8. PLAT - Location Surveyor's Plat: of all wells on property must be plotted and permit If not, scaled hand drawn sketch: numbers provided. LJ YES or ■ NO ■ YES or • NO 9. ESTIMATED WATER REQUIREMENTS 10. WATER SUPPLY SOURCE USE WATER REQUIREMENTS [NEW WELLS -❑ HOUSEHOLD USE COMMERCIAL USE IRRIGATION # # of units Gallons per Day Acre -Feel per Year EXISTING • DEVELOPED WELL SPRING WELL PERMIT NUMBERS PROPOSED AQUIFERS- (CHECK ONE/ 0 ALLUVIAL 0 UPPER ARAPAHOE 0 UPPER DAWSON 0 LOWER ARAPAHOE ❑ LOWER DAWSON 0 LARAMIE FOX HILLS ❑ DENVER 0 DAKOTA D OTHER - # of S. F of acres STOCK WATERING OTHER: # of head ❑ MUNICPAL WATER COURT DECREE CASE NUMBERS: • ASSOCIATION ❑ COMPANY 0 DISTRICT NAME TOTAL LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR SERVICE 0 YES or ■ NO 11. WAS AN ENGINEER'S WATER SUPPLY REPORTDEVELOPED?r] (This may be required before our review is completed.) YES or ■ NO IF YES, PLEASE FORWARD WITH THIS FORM. ❑ SEPTIC TANK/LEACH FIELD 0 LAGOON ❑ ENGINEERED SYSTEM (Attach a copy of engineenng design ) O CENTRAL SYSTEM DISTRICT NAME: O VAULT LOCATION SEWAGE HAULED TO: 10 OTHER: • • GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT FORM (Shall be submitted with application) GARFIELD COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and /vm ', G ✓ E J+'f u. --u4 rcz•-/ (hereinafter APPLICANT) agree as follows: ,/ 1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for /46^ -4 -le- -T.,/ // En oo'.--.i (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type of subdivision or land use review applications, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the PROJECT, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT. APPLICANT agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional COUNTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, APPLICANT shall pay additional billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the PROJECT mentioned above. APPLICANT acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the COUNTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. APPLICANT Signature Date: /' /!�'u ,_3 j 2oo,6 i-feA li/14411:- Print 4411 Print Name Mailing Address: 1/2 -el 4z-/&', ?el . , .5 f / /Z,r/ 10/2004 Page 4 • • GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE Garfield County, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners ("Board") Resolution No. 98-09, has established a fee structure ("Base Fee") for the processing of each type of subdivision and land use applications. The Base Fee is an estimate of the average number of hours of staff time devoted to an application, multiplied by an hourly rate for the personnel involved. The Board recognized that the subdivision and land use application processing time will vary and that an applicant should pay for the total cost of the review which may require additional billing. Hourly rates based on the hourly salary, and fringe benefits costs of the respective positions combined with an hourly overhead cost for the office will be used to establish the actual cost of County staff time devoted to the review of a particular project. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the Base Fee. After the Base Fee has been expended, the applicant will be billed based on actual staff hours accrued. Any billing shall be paid in full prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment or subdivision plan. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. Checks, including the appropriate Base Fee set forth below, must be submitted with each land use application, and made payable to the Garfield County Treasurer. Applications will not be accepted without the required application fee. Base Fees are non-refundable in full, unless a written request for withdraw from the applicant is submitted prior the initial review of the application materials. Applications must include an Agreement for Payment Form ("Agreement") set forth below. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. The complete fee schedule for subdivision and land use applications is attached. • • Tom and Evelyn Monckton 4110 County Road 243 New Castle, CO 81647 303-917-3074 Cell 970-984-3950 February 2, 2006 To Whom It May Concern: We have asked Walter E. Brown to act on our behalf and as our council in all matters relative to our property in Garfield County, Colorado. This includes, but is not limited to matters of sub dividing and water rights. We thank you in advance for allowing Mr. Brown to proceed on our behalf. Sincerely: Tom Monckton • • MONCKTON MEADOWS SKETCH PLAN MAIN ELK CREEK, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date of Submittal: March 6, 2006 • General Site and Situation Information Monckton Meadows Subdivision is proposed to be a three lot subdivision along Main Elk Creek, northwest of New Castle. The property is currently unsubdivided and consists of 53.94 acres. The lots would range in size from the smallest lot of 6.53 acres to the largest lot of 36.43 acres. There is an existing single family residence on the site, along with associated agricultural buildings. The property is located approximately 5 miles northwest of New Castle, along County Road 243. The property is bordered on the west by the county road, bordered on the east by Bureau of Land Management lands, and bordered to the north and south by other residential and agricultural lands. Main Elk Creek runs through the center of the property. Topography slopes gently, westerly and easterly, toward the creek, which will not present any significant development issues. Portions of the eastern edge of the property slope more -steeply, and will not be disturbed. The only natural hazard known to affect the property is the floodplain of Main Elk Creek. No development within the floodplain is contemplated. Each subdivision lot would be allowed a single family residential dwelling and attendant, subordinate structures, such as a garage, shed, workshop or other structure allowed by the existing zoning. Lot 3, the larger lot, will be allowed a primary residential structure and a detached accessory dwelling unit, consistent with Garfield County regulations. Access to the property is currently provided by the county road. There are two existing access points, one on the southern boundary of the site, and the other in the central portion of the site. The latter access provides ingress and egress to the existing residential structure. One additional access is proposed. This access would be provided from the county road, approximately 700 feet north of the existing, primary access location. Large lot residential development of the property will not be impeded by any known hazards. The property is not shown on any of the natural hazard maps utilized by the County to assess the likelihood of hazard existence and mitigation. If any hazards are encountered through further study or development, appropriate mitigation will be conducted. Sketch Plan Application Monckton Meadows Subdivision Page 2 of 5 • • Land Use Breakdown Existing Zoning: A/R/RD. There are no proposed zoning changes. Total Development Area: 53.94 acres. Total Number of Proposed Lots: Three. Total Number of Proposed Dwelling Units: Four Total Area of Proposed Non -Residential Floor Space: None Total Number of Individual Dwelling Units Proposed for Each Structure: 1 per structure. Total Number of Proposed Off -Street Parking Spaces: Consistent with residential standards. Total Proposed Density: One residential unit per 13.5 acres. Supplemental Information Water Supply Water for residential purposes is proposed to be provided by three individual wells. Monckton Well No. 1 is an existing well first put to beneficial use in June, 1925. This well has existed for many years and is currently going through adjudication in the District Court, Water Division No. 5. The two additional wells will be adjudicated through the District Court and will be situated on each of the subdivision lots, thereby providing individual water supplies to the individual lots. Included in this Sketch Plan application is a copy of the Application for Water Rights, for changes of water rights, and for approval of plan for augznentation. The wells will all be completed in the alluvium of Main Elk Creek, which will provide an ample physical water supply to each of the lots. The preliminary plan application will contain the requisite materials concerning the legal and physical water supplies. Sewage Treatment and Disposal Sewage treatment and disposal will be accomplished by individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) for each subdivision lot. The existing soil conditions are conducive for such systems, as Sketch Plan Application Monckton Meadows Subdivision Page 3 of 5 • • is more -fully discussed in the next section. All systems will comply with applicable state and county regulations. NRCS Soil Designations There are four principal soil types found on the property. The ISD systems would be located in the Ascalon -Pena complex, identified on the included map as Map Unit 7. For building and wastewater systems, these soils are characterized as "deep and well -drained." Therefore, the use of conventional construction and wastewater systems is contemplated. Impact on Lakes. Streams and Topography It is contemplated that there will be very low impacts to all streams, water bodies and topography on and near the subdivision site. The only known physical hazard is associated with the 100 -year floodplain associated with Main Elk Creek. There is no proposal to disturb the floodplain. All construction work within the subdivision will be conducted to minimize, to the fullest extent possible, impacts to the stream by limiting erosion using all acceptable means. The topography of the site will not be altered to any meaningful extent. Hence, erosion will be minimized, which will maintain stream quality. The steeper slopes on the eastern portion of the site are not proposed to be disturbed. Potential Radiation Hazards No known radiological hazards exist on the site. Consistent with preliminary plan requirements, a geologic study will be completed and submitted with the application. If radiological hazards are found to exist, a mitigation plan will be adopted consistent with the identified hazard. Evidence of Access As mentioned previously, access to the subdivision will be directly from County Road 243. It is anticipated that a driveway permit will be required for the new, proposed access. The applicant will work directly with the county road and bridge department to effectively site this access. If a new driveway permit is required, it will be provided with the preliminary plan application. Utilities To the extent possible, the subdivider will record covenants requiring use of renewable energy sources, such as active or passive solar orientation. Electricity will be provided by Xcel Energy, which currently provides the electrical utility service in the area. Sketch Plan Application Monckton Meadows Subdivision Page 4 of 5 • • There is no natural gas service to this location. It is contemplated that propane could be utilized, should an owner desire such utility. Telephone service is currently provided by Qwest. It is contemplated that Qwest will be able to extend adequate service to the additional lots. Cable television is not currently available to the site. Satellite television service is possible and could be available to the subdivision lots if it is desired by the individual lot owner. Sketch Plan Application Monckton Meadows Subdivision Pane5of5 1. Name, address and telephone number of Applicants: Tom & Evelyn Monckton 4310 County Road 243 New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3950 c/o Mark E. Hamilton, Esq. CALOIA, HOUPT AND HAMILTON, P.C. 1204 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-6067 mhamesooris.net FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: APPLICATION FOR GROUND WATER RIGHTS Name of structure: Monckton Well No. 1 a. Location: NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 35, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M., at a point 1550 ft. from the S. line and 275 ft. from the E. line of said Sec. 35. b. Source: Main Elk Creek alluvium. MONCKTON-Application-1 FN -1 DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5 STATE OF COLORADO 109 Eighth Street, Suite 104 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-5075, 945-8756 fax I, _ 1 i �✓ l __--- 0 1 C COURT USE ONLY -- CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF: TOM AND EVELYN MONCKTON in Garfield County, Colorado. Attorney for Applicants: Mark E. Hamilton, Esq. 24535 CALOIA, HOUPT & HAMILTON, P.C. 1204 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 31601 (970) 945-6067 phone (970) 945-6292 fax e-mail: mhamesooris.net Case No. O5CW APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS, FOR CHANGES OF WATER RIGHTS, AND FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION 1. Name, address and telephone number of Applicants: Tom & Evelyn Monckton 4310 County Road 243 New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3950 c/o Mark E. Hamilton, Esq. CALOIA, HOUPT AND HAMILTON, P.C. 1204 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-6067 mhamesooris.net FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: APPLICATION FOR GROUND WATER RIGHTS Name of structure: Monckton Well No. 1 a. Location: NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 35, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M., at a point 1550 ft. from the S. line and 275 ft. from the E. line of said Sec. 35. b. Source: Main Elk Creek alluvium. MONCKTON-Application-1 FN -1 • • District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncktons Case No. 05CW Paget c. Date of initiation of appropriation: June 1, 1925 d. How appropriation was initiated: construction and use of well Date water applied to beneficial use: June 1, 1925 f. Amount claimed: 0.033 c.f.s. (15 g.p.m.), 1.36 A.F./year, absolute e. • h. Uses: Remarks: 3. Name of structure: a. Location: b. Source: domestic, irrigation, stock water (3 single family homes with 3,000 s.f. of irrigation per home and stock water) This well was in use prior to May 22, 1971 and is therefore entitled to late registration and exemption from the priority system pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 37-92-602(1)(e) and -602(4). Applicants hereby request that this right be administered with a June 1, 1925 priority date instead of the date of filing. A map depicting the locations of all structures identified in this Application is attached as Exhibit A. Monckton Well No. 2 SW1/aNW1/aSec. 36,T.4S.,R.91 W.,6th P.M.,atapoint 3100 ft. from the S. line and 25 ft. from the W. line of said Sec. 36. Main Elk Creek alluvium. c. Date of initiation of appropriation: August I I, 2005 d. How appropriation was initiated: survey of well location e. Date water applied to a beneficial use: N/A f. Amount claimed: 0.033 c.f.s. (15 g.p.m.), 0.37 A.F./year, conditional cr • Proposed uses: domestic, irrigation (2 single family homes with 1500 s.f. irrigation) h. Remarks: Applicant is requesting adjudication of this structure as an exempt well pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 37-92-602(1)(b),-602(3)(b)(II)(A) and - 602(4). 4. Name of structure: Monckton Well No. 3 MONCKTON-Application-1 FN -1 District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncktons Case No. O5CW _ Page 3 a. Location: SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 35, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M., at a point 1000 ft. from the S. line and 300 ft from the E. line of said Sec. 35. b. Source: Main Elk Creek alluvium. c. Date of initiation of appropriation: August 11, 2005 d. How appropriation was initiated: survey of well location e. Date water applied to beneficial use: N/A f. Amount claimed: 0.033 c.f.s. (15 g.p.m.), 0.50 A.F./year, conditional g• Proposed uses: domestic, irrigation and stock watering (one single family home with 1500 s.f. of irrigation and stock water for two horses) h. Remarks: Applicant is simultaneously requesting approval of a plan for augmentation which provides for replacement of all depletions in time and amount so as to alleviate any potential for injury to other vested water rights (see below Fifth Claim) SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF: APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER RIGHTS 5. Name of structure: Monckton Pump and Pipeline a. Location: NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 35, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M., at a point 2150 ft. from the S. line and 150 ft. from the E. line of said Section 35. b. Source: Main Elk Creek c. Date of initiation of appropriation: August 11, 2005 d. How appropriation was initiated: location and survey of point of diversion e. Date water applied to beneficial use: N/A f. Amount claimed: 1.70 c.f.s., conditional. Proposed uses: recreation, fish propagation, aesthetics, irrigation, and to deliver water into Monckton Pond Nos. 1 and 2 for the uses described below for such structures MONC {TON -App lication-1 FN -1 District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncktons Case No. 05CW _ Page 4 h. Remarks: 6. Name of structure: a. Location: b. Source: • this structure will also serve as an alternate point of diversion for the Clinetop Ditch No. 1 pursuant to the chance of water right described below in Applicant's Fourth Claim. Monckton Spring NW'/, SW V4 Sec. 36, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M., at a point 1600 ft. from the S. line and 120 ft. from the W. line of said Sec. 36. Main Elk Creek c. Date of initiation of appropriation: August 11, 2005 d. How appropriation was initiated: location and survey of spring and putting water to beneficial use. e. Date water applied to beneficial use: August 11, 2005 f. Amount claimed: 0.50 c.f.s., absolute g Use: wildlife enhancement THIRD CLALM FOR RELIEF: APPLICATION FOR WATER STORAGE RIGHTS 7. Name of structure: Monckton Pond No. 1 a. Location: NAV 1 SW ',/1 Sec. 36, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M. at a point 2210 ft. from the S. line and 110 ft. from the W. line of said Sec. 36. b. Source: natural inflows and Monckton Pump & Pipeline, which diverts from Main Elk Creek e. Date of initiation of appropriation: August 11, 2005 d. How appropriation was initiated: location and survey of pond site e. Date water applied to beneficial use: N/A f. g• Amount claimed: 3.0 A.F. (all active storage), conditional Surface area: 0.50 acr s MMONCKTON-Application- 1 FN -i District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncictons Case No. 05CW Page 5 h. Dam height: i. Uses: 8. Name of structure: a. Location: b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 5 ft. 1 recreation, fish propagation, aesthetics and augmentation for domestic, irrigation and stockwater Monckton Pond No. 2 NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec. 36, T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M., at a point 2080 ft. from the S. line and 75 ft. from the W. line of said Sec. 36. Source of water to fill reservoir: natural inflows and Monckton Pump & Pipeline, which diverts from Main Elk Creek. Date of initiation of appropriation: August 11, 2005 How appropriation was initiated: location and survey of pond Date water applied to beneficial use: N/A Amount claimed: 3.0 A.F. (all active storage), conditional. Surface area: 0.50 acres Dam height: 5 ft. i. Uses: recreation, fish propagation, aesthetics, and augmentation for domestic, irrigation and stock water uses. FOURTH CLAM FOR RELIEF: APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF WATER RIGHT 9. Decreed name of structure to be chanced: a. Original decree: b. Decreed location: c. Decreed amounts: MONCKTON-App lication-1 FN -1 Clinetop Ditch No. 1 C.A. 1328, Dec. 3, 1903 (Priority 43A) C.A. 3431, Jan. 11, 1943 (Priority 220C) The headgate is at a point which bears S 15° 54' E. 1020.6 ft. from corner No. 7 of H.E.S. 53 in T. 4 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M. 0.90 c.f.s. (Priority 43A) (Applicants claim 0.60 c.f.s.) 1.10 c.f.s. (Priority 220C) (Applicants claim 1.10 c.f.s.) • District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncktons Case No. O5CW Page 6 d. Appropriation dates: May 10, 1335 (Priority 43A) March 4, 1921 (Priority 220C) e. Decreed use: irrigation f. Remarks: diversion records are attached as Exhibit B 10. Description of change sought: Applicant seeks confirmation of an alternate point of diversion for 1.70 c.f.s. decreed to the Clinetop Ditch No. 1 at the location of the Monckton Pump & Pipeline, described above in Second Claim. Since the same lands as have been historically irrigated will continue to be irrigated, no change in place or type of use is contemplated (provided however that Applicants are requesting the right to store historical consumptive use credits associated with the Clinetop Ditch No. 1 and the Clinetop Ditch in the Monckton Pond Nos. 1 and/or 2 for later augmentation releases pursuant to the plan for augmentation described below in Applicants' Fifth Claim). The 1.70 c.f.s. consists of 0.60 c.f.s. of Priority 43A and 1.10 c.f.s. of Priority 220C. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION (includes changes of water rights) 11. Names of structures to be augrnented: a. Monckton Well No. 3 (described above in First Claim) b. Monckton Pond No. 1 (described above in Third Claim) c. Monckton Pond No. 2 (described above in Third Claim) 12. Nnrnes of structures to be changed and/or used for augmentation: a. Clinetop Ditch (1) Original decree: C.A. 1328, Dec. 3, 1908 (Priority 49A) C.A. 3431, Jan. 11, 1943 (Priority 220B) (2) Location: NE 1/4 NW 1/1 SW 1/4 of Sec. 26, T. 4 S., R. 91W., 6t1i P.M., Garfield County (3) Decreed amounts: 2.3 c.f.s. (Priority 49A) (Applicants claim 0.703 c.f.s.) MONCKTON :application -1 FN -1 • • District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Monckton Case No. O5CW Page 7 5.36 c.f.s. (Priority 220B) (Applicants claim 1.484 c.f.s.) (4) Appropriation dates: Oct. 1, 1835 (Priority 49A) March 4, 1921 (Priority 220B) (5) Decreed use: irrigation (6) Remarks: diversion records are attached as Exhibit C b. Clinetop Ditch No. 1 (described above in Fourth Claim) c. Monckton Pond No. 1 (described above in Third Claim) d. Monckton Pond No. 2 (described above in Third Claim) 13. Summary of plan for augmentation_ (includes change of water rights): Total annual depletions from pumping Monckton Well No. 3 for use in one single family residence (including irrigation of 1500 s.f. and watering of two head of livestock) are estimated to be 0.15 A.F. year. This estimate is based upon: (1) an assumed water demand of 350 g.p.d for in-house uses, with 15% depletions; (2) 1500 s.f. or irrigation using. 2.64 A.Fiacre at 80% efficiency (2.11 A.F./acre annual depletions); and (3) 2 head of horses consuming 11 g.p.d. each (100% consumptive). Out -of -priority pond evaporation from up to 1.0 acres of pond surface area will also be augmented. Total annual evaporation is estimated at 3.67 acre-feet/acre using SEO methodology for this elevation (6100 ft.) with no credit for effective precipitation. Estimated total depletions are therefore 3.82 A.F. All out -of -priority depletions will be augmented in time and amount with releases from storage in Monckton Pond Nos. 1 and 2 or the bypass of water legally and physically available for diversion pursuant to the above-described water rights adjudicated to the Clinetop Ditch and/or the Clinetop Ditch No. 1. In particular, Applicants presently anticipate that up to 2.1 acres of historically irrigated lands will occur due to construction of ponds, roads, homes and other improvements upon historically irrigated areas. This dry -up will generate 3.99 A.F./year of consumptive use credit (assuming annual irrigation consumptive use of 1.90 A.F./acre). These consumptive use credits will be used to augment out -of - priority depletions from the Monckton Well No. 3 and evaporation from the Monckton Pond Nos. 1 and 2, totaling 3.82 A.F./year. The C.U. credits will either be used to directly augment these depletions (by bypass of the irrigation rights to the stream) or indirectly (by storage in Monckton Pond Nos. 1 and 2 for later release during the non -irrigation season). Applicant hereby requests approval changes of both the location and the type of use of the water rights decreed to the Clinetop Ditch and the Clinetop Ditch No. 1 to the extent necessary to store consumptive use credits attributable to these two water rights in Monckton Pond Nos. 1 and/or 2 for later release pursuant to this augmentation plan. MONCKTON--app lication-1 FN -1 • 40 District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncktons Case No. O5CW _ Page 8 13. Land ownership information: All structures identified above are located upon Applicants' property in Garfield County except that: (1) the headgate of the Clinetop Ditch is located upon lands owned by Robert C. and Janet L. Olson, 5643 County Road 243, New Castle, CO 31647; and (2) the headgate of the Clinetop Ditch No. 1 is located upon lands owned by Ralph D. and Connie V. Hubbell, 4600 County Rd. 243, New Castle, CO 81647. WHEREFORE, Applicants respectfully request as follows: (a) Confirmation of an absolute groundwater right for the Monckton Well No. 1 in the amount of 0.033 c.f.s. for the uses described above with a priority date of June 1, 1925; (b) Confirmation of conditional groundwater rights for the Monckton Well No. 2 and the Monckton Weil No. 3, each in the amount of 0.033 c.f.s., for the uses desribed above; (c) Confirmation of conditional surface water rights for the Monckton Pump & Pipeline, in the amount of 1.70 c.f.s., and the Monckton Spring, in the amount of 0.50 c.f.s., for the uses described above; (d) Confirmation of conditional water storage rights for the Monckton Pond No. 1 and the Monckton Pond No. 2, each in the amount of 3.0 acre-feet, for the uses described above; (e) Approval of an alternate point of diversion for Applicants' interest in the Clinetop Ditch No. lat the location of the Monckton Pump & Pipeline; (f) Approval of the plan for augmentation described above; and (a) Such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 31st day of August, 2005. CALOIA, HOUPT & HAMILTON, P.C. Attorneys for Applicants Duly authorized signature on file at the law offices of Caloia, Houpt & Hamilton, P.C., Glenwood Springs /s/Mark E. Hamilton, Esq. Mark E. Hamilton, Esq., No. 24585 MO NCKTON- App l icado n-1 FN -1 • District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 Application of Moncktons Case No. 05CW _ Page 9 VERIFICATION I, Paul S. Bussone, P.E., water engineer for Applicants, state under oath that I have read this Application and verify its content. STATE OF COLORXDO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) P.E. Duly authorized signature on file at the law offices of Caloia, Houpt & Hamilton, P.C., Glenwood Springs /s/Paul S. Bussone Paul S. Bussone, P.E. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31St day of Aucz.lst, 2005, by Paul S. Bussone, WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 11/29/05 Duly authorized signature on file at the law offices of Caloia, Houpt & Hamilton, P.C., Glenwood Springs /s/ William Brunworth Notary Public MONCKTON-Application-1 FN -1 1�4 i •1 I is ��"1•-_ �_.... ==ms = ,'�'.� .•,•. 'moi ♦� �'\� �.`' •-.• •:` •;•-••-..,-_.`=• . \�-4.,,,,.... ,,,,i..... \...„....„..._ -••• •:,';„..:„......,,,,,„ 7,:. • • , . ', • ' -• • "N, ‘.„ . •••••;. '-� • • • , • j. 31. , V •a ;: 1,c,\ ';\\�\ �' 1.-7;A( _� r (� ill r;. CS M, ` ) N ?UMP ANO?!' 4c r CUNEi1CP: GHEACGATETCH NC. t -.7-.- ' k C(/‘),(---‘'-i,.• (t � ` S. dONC N I:• _ (..-..t.,,'� 1' ^ / ` t t `JUCNC,`CN .CNC }7 11-, = - '.i l • - • MCNCX-L'N PCNC 02V.:"--":4'— \- 22 `"'RESOURCE aialr 'srlfa sa Var 4saa MNQI N6tcpgfl-4 1 NC. AO aar s.COMMA wt m nil iA MO, -617► 1 AS PAI ai-t177 MONCKTON WATER RIGHTS LOCATION MAP SCALE. 1" = 15.0 IlydroBasc WcI Interface STRUCTURE SUMMARY FOR; CLTNETOP DITCH MO 1 O 4 o �g bi e . W Q O • OUCO.0 014.00 W W � Z.. M V )+ C W U1 4 4F •.\X Q S OV FUwxw :U F O a W q W S .n W n 4 G 4 4: . i X2 U..V4.ca E •. X 41W0 ••X0u_v.0 Dmut- aF O�Ecn CF.7Q 42 4'. W Z W . Q! q X 41 F 420 40400 V1:4C400 2.,.24EW CEU‹ STATUS USES ADJ DATE 0 ALL PRI 43A HON ABSOL W N W 41 S O m � N ('4893 01 W . F • r` N N W C CIO= 000 > O Q Q U 22= O O C_ O 08- 00 W W a 0$m (41:48.4 41412 WWWCC .2(302 4 U U 4 V a Im NNN 4) , 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r1 Io r1 00000.-: m 000. N O N N N M r•1 mM nn . .e 0 a Q U 2 0 0 0 0 00000. 1 1 I l l O Y1 Y1 41 N Y1 (.1 000000 1 1 - N N N N N m m m m m N 4,mm m m e\ 00000.. II r N N N N N 0 100===M 00000. 01 01 01 01 01 01 0%0%010,0141 NNN N N f1 N n NNNNN M IRRIGATED ACRES SUMMARY 0.4.4 00(0 0041 N N 444 V L Y 3 00. . LC 0 0 0 ‘00 .. 41 m N 14 X ✓ u 1. L a C .713 N O m E V OA 9 9 -I C V 1 2 Y C U F a 1 0 4 81 7 n 0 0 4,4 F 14 V N a 4 d V O ti Ilydroflase Wcb Interface E F C 01.0N m'4 'a 0' ON -0 N.+1 v1 r T P T r T — m . • ...0 - r .N010./...01,010.04.01C0 r • N •0.014041010,..C400 N 0 T C0020 0 T 11 V • r m N . r N N .y m'4 m Al 01 10 u1 T T m T Yi N M1 mo N (4 . . . ..r .'1• r N 41 O. 4. r - - T .-. .N.01 41 m N.00 0 41 r 41 N N `0 41 N T 41 0, 0 N h P 41 u, v.01 0 O 4 -O ,..-ry- • •^ T 01 . • . .- 0 .... T 10 01 0 41 r 41 10 N 10 .0 42 42 •� .d Y1 r N r 'O m Y1 IR 10 r T 10 0 Y1 r P u1 0 1n r T 0 • • • N • 1p • 1 O r T P1 - .N.. - r .N.. T n1 T ...i 10 T T a - '0 n .o P .0 .n 01 P o a 11 r o - n1 T 0, 0'4414,(4110 10 T (S41Y10' T'4r m01.. P 01 ON m 0 . a'4 • 01 N 01 MM.. ..1 01 = ' •-•01 as y1- 01 N T - r r h N N 41 T Y1 in 41 r r 41r010 NOre'4r '421 0TO CO • • • P 10•PN • • 1 100 V - N ••• r •N04 -01 P -r 10 r1 10 N P1 in m 10 r0 01 (11 10 in 0.4000 Oro n 'f1 o - .n V1 10 •� 0000,-.000 • 10 Y1 .0 U1 1A J1 1O 10 Y1 u1 0 9 0 Y Y1 ▪ 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 p O C C O 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- r- ... p O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O .Q. O O O O o 0 0 0 C O C 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 Z4:4 A a m O 0 o Oi'1m 00 00 0 O -r 00 0000 000 Oen P .0 m A N.. •• O- N N 10 - N O O O ! O r- N-- 7 7 7 7 • r N N r 10 T N t'i N T- N ry O 00 a L Y L L T '4 tw h 10 '4 O. - O O 0 ^ 0 0. ' .. 10 N T T N r - N '4 '4 r 4'1 10 ^• 0 0 0 001 V 10 T P - t0 1n .. 0 10 - 01 N 41 N 1'1 P r r u1 41 - P r .n r•1 T - r -- O 0 41 11 O N O 0 .0 01 Q 10 O N T ..1 •� - '� C O Nn.'100 PO.NNO.100 rm N -A1N 00-tnrNNO O TNo 0 W y 0n - WWN • 0006010000 0040013)'4101000r-(10(00770041 oroo---- 4.1 ooaoopor--oa000 .Ci TP.N O TX1100 V -O- -O - NONO T1n OP 0 7o =Q O N COO -00 O ...... N-vr N rr0 0 i. W W 4. 4- (.. ..410.441.4 2 10r 0 ••100000M001004141 •0N N H 0 0000.00. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O S O r N M w 010 r'4 T O- N T. 0 W, 01 01 O- N T .. 0 10 r m T r N. a ',n 4 0 0 Y1 T O 41 0 0 0 Y1 10 10 10 10 W W V 10 10 10 r r r r , r r r m a m m m W O1 T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T } P1 0\ 10 r mrloomoowm0o0mo0,0, n....Y1 O N N N 0 0 DNC HAXQ u Y 4 0 u N •0 J 0. IlydroBase Wcb Interface .AMMW410N..NmeNm N m N w w .. N w N N O w N N n N .. m N n N N N N O m W. n'9 w s m *m �'0 m v O m n 0,0 w.'OvnN 0,0.0%0,10 P m N m y . w n w n N m n w • • C • . • . c sn'9 snn sew swnn w .1 0 141 '1 vi.ri-zla ^ O m n .. 0 0 0 m -37g= w O'05.*0.mm 0.0.00 '9 > `,1t §U:i Nww m n N.Ow I^ P'9 CO N r t N *'` ,,. .I'1• 00 C CI Mnw.^ NOO nm O'0w..m N =IA ••O'O O.. t� Nn..m m.nm^.. 31 C --cm '9 w '0 s n n .9 of .. ^ a N 3� w C�1 el.. .. 0 c m..., a; y € A a n 04. V O ' > '� e9 — as : C ai005:0 - u.. — a a Vg CA u q A —CI a .. X. (.1 4 L O q �• W L — C 4= .•.. u. VC Ci a F 0-.000 N O.O O..N*.W (4 MC1WONW w .. ... ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .. J q ` \n w w w w'0•0'A www w w'0w a 00 a 41 a . 00 A w 00000000000000 OU 43) 000041041 w 0 O O w m w g q q 11 ,q P Y O N WI '0 w mm.. a s .• w m r '9 n A 41 01 A M. ... u N 0.;‘,..;...:....c 7 7 7 7 7 • 0 C 0 0 C a 0 L 00,-.0„.......„...00. m h.. 0 0 ^.•y r'9N0 .•OmA m 0 .... A A A a A ! 0' u '0 m'0 -''9'•1 v'.1'.1 n s ...~ C0.7 610 n N.. N 61 01 a s 61 0 V. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ L t. %. Le L \ .: i A mm00mm^m^ mm mm M. 7 7 7 2 7 01.1 q t. 00**0000000000 u lI a., oa O n .O N t9 ...0 0 a N N O m 0 7 7 7 7 7 S a> -• O O 7 .. 0 r N N N r N .. I. 1. t. Li t. N 71 F' 0 \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ N. \ \ ..... L L . J r www 'n A A w w n♦. N A w N N N N N` \ t 414 0000 0000 0 00 000 1 0 a •• >. N 43 r. mm 0.N70. 4'1 LO I+m 710.N. sa m m m a m m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 s J m m m m m m 'T m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >V T 0 a Ilydrollasc Web Interface • • WO -. t 4s 4 v 4 E 4 u 0. W U a 1-.7. w ..4 ... w W 4 1. t0 S X1. 0314' O ca C 0. = y U • i.. 0 Y W .. •o s 06.5 ..1 2 N • 0W W to 4 •• . 4_ W E A .2.. N U E =40 �'1 _4 E •• 4 4 O ' U Um ..�'..sU> Sx1 SS U,0)U 034 Z Z 8..042Z3UU . :04W C2NO a W4U1 4Zz1..404W •W44.41. 434V0h433 3-x.1FWasu4 STATD5 USES 3 E F. 9 .0 EE h 36. ▪ oo 3,... t N 1. F 3 C .=0 5 4 09 2 4 82 - U u- U 4 C 4 N U 6 0» u N u 3. WN !(:21",c13. 2; W W N 00 x W O U4 0. U N S U 4 0 W U 4 O 4.- = 0 4 ..A S 3: ., 0WUN ;vt N . 0 o f N • �. E 0 u OFC - 2 E W '...04 O C E F .1 F N S 40 NSF ,10.04-74 UEO. \0 0• a0 00001.0.0 W 0 4 1- W 4 Y W 3 4 .7_ C F 1. 04 6 4 W 0 0 0 :1 = n 1.4i 4 2 4:003 . W W 41 .1 U J S C= 0 0 • 4 x G W W W 0 W U U 3.451w O T U �. L> 1. S U Sa S hl S fJ 3 fd 3 W G< W: W C W C [.4. S S :+i u u 0. U r1 4 09 4 to (.11.4 U W W C .i :J 2a - Z S 4Z4 v1 0403)131- 3 N 2 W g W 4 0 N CO2240.6.....07 F N z m 4 4 06 C 4 .: o x s 4 G 4 4 4 3=3,333:3333 4 4 4 4.... ... ISFIPSTK U 4 4 4 4¢ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 M000000=0404000 OONmO O NO C 0000 ••0 b I'1 O 0 P '4 0 00 N 0 N •. ^I O 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 O .. O O 0 0 0 A. T m m .= 0- 0 00 n ti 4 m a N M m N 0 `O 0 N N O C N. O N 0 0 C .. .00 m m m m x m x 2 0 02 2 1. 440+.140. ONN U00 U0. UUTAU x A 4NNNr1+ sAUAssAA 000000000.0000 III 1 1 1 1 1( 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 to P .n 1'7 n1 00 l•1 00800000 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NNN 4141 N r` a j.. .. r. m m 01 m 01 m m m m m m 0 N N N N m m m m a m m m m 01 P A A A A c 0 T - 031 n T 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111111111111111 040101040404041'. N 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I it I IIs m m m m m a a m m P I.1 n r1 ..1 .q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ====01========== m a m m m m Y1 Y1 v1 Y1 0440000===0==== 0^ O C 0 0 0 t0 •0 N v 01 0f A A 4004 C41'4034090909 s A r A A ....... N N Y1 Y1 f1 Vt Y1 Y1 P P O P PPP 00M0)==== N N N N N 0404 0. N N NNN N N r7 Iw r1 N 00 Q F F F O ▪ 7 F F C 71 N ta 0 0 G 0 ILI On4n Un -0= 0 m :4 14 W - 0. 2 szza. a1 14 mz= A 0 = u r Si • N N •n N Z 0 14 c.. _ F 4 .1 04 4a10 p2 a F * C.. 4, 79 7 a ah r cc i• e- F•Ui-4 4- .1 cr 04 44.1=1 .-i S> r J V to td m. tJ 4.1 tJ = C.7 G = ci_ .c c. 4 44 t..- O u- v 1J o 0.. a1 v1 :n as u 77 71-44 HydroBasc Web Interface 40 = ====7.--= 1.1 z 5 2 C 4 X r 4 4 4•G J U Ina 10;1 0 00 C- n O O N OO.AO n00 at r - r 4C A - n N 11 r In N 0090900 X s S CO 2 2 UUn UOU •' r 1.14 n N•O0* Ot at 4) a1 = a1 s..N IA .O N 0 0 0- .. N O I I I 1 t I I P10/0 4 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 11 • 91410010 N N N N 41 T O 000100101 a• r r - 0 0 - (n 1 N O O O r r r r t1 -n 10.0 01 0 .0122 01 01 T T 01 Qt 01 01 at •A 00 a1 220!414,0 000 41 T a 001* .A A 41 000 .`1 N N N 0 0 0 .A In 1 01 at .A 41 41 41 V1 N 41 01 221 0* 0 at<Tr ^.41.0 N N N n r n r 911 0 0 IRRIGATED ACHES SUMMARY • uF a W N 4 24 E. s-1 F U m m r. N Q1 m N a 01 .0 9 ^ 91 m 01 •0 0 4 C r .O .n - .T r O OO N T xr m N (1 N. ••. N �• - 0 N .•• s 01 N O 0 O 41 0 0 .• 0.- • N r 0* y 31 .A 01 N O 0* 01 N N-- - N N r . N •••• r • N 0 O - of 10 ^ CO 0 01 01 R 0t - N - r 41 01 1. 01 m .4 01 0 •11 a1- - N 010 •- 0 n .'+N NN 0t -Nr --N r- .+N 0 N 10 10 LD .••1001 armor LA r ••. N N01rt1.n � N s sn •a O In tAm •••.• 1ap r rr • N N N O - N .••• 11 91 - .. to N b- .0 10 . r a r .. al •0 r N 10 CO r N O N •1 N .0 P • • - O . y'1 01 N 01 .a m C a CO a N N N '0 C N (n In 1n N N N N N 01 11 r 01 CO - CO CO 91 - !n fn N N N N N r a CO 0009999 a • 0 • 11 a •A 01 a 9 10 n.10 N N • 91 994 .• 1994 ... NM t'1 N N N In N 1.1 44.4.. l0 - .0 a ••1 10 4* . C.1 v n 10 a 9N.9.9 •019 O N • N N N •-. • N- N N - 01 a- - r - In F G1 L 7 O 4 0.4 a. IF. - ..3 4 4 ,t; S .. F I Cr i.. 0 0 a1 it a 00 c1 c.... L.; N N .. r a. CC 44 m m m 4 Y d •. L 54 ' 4 00. 6 0. - 4 4 m m a :• 4 S Z F 4 •O C O i C C. N C N - O. 1 0. .O. O ✓ 01 Z a m A 4 m a C 4 7 CI o u a m x V N J it N O m m F 1. 4 U •. m 44 q a C a O m r m 0 w U .a u G .0 F 4 4 - C m w 0 4 y Y r u O A a+ N F U in 0 m 7 V 4 - - 4 4 0 0 to m 4101 V m •_. v1 N 9 • r 0 41 •a N �r CO at lA 4110 t1 -a N • N - • r 0 • 01 r N r r n to - N 01 41 r r 0 0 41 - a. .-•000 r.o r Om0 Al In !1100 m. s•a ONN In NN 09 In- -O N.- N.- 4, 4-\\ 4\ 4-\ \ N N. N. N 10 N\ x N'A N r' 01 0 0 0 10 0 r .O 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O C O O O O O O O p11200,0.0000C44v1C0002200 9 9 v. In -. N .a CO t9 r r r r •a . r T 221 to N CO r a 9 0 lO 41 01 CO CO. O N 0/ 9 41 9 0* 01 0 9 9 r CO fl a v a 01 .O n .a 11 r 141 41 - 01 0 0 .. N r 09 94 01 ;•11•• N +171l- 01 In r•`1 to rnl N 00000000000000 .-• 0 00 -122 r 404 -.111 -In r ON N:n 444N 0 0^1000 0 0000-- - 0 0 0 0 0-- 0 •0 - O C -91 n 41 41 N V1 •A .0 .0 !141 r CO 9 0 91 91 n 0 91 101 N 41 N .1 .A N101* .0 10 .0 .0 010 m m 01 01 01 01 01 0t pt T Ot 01 01 01 T CM 01 01 at 8 00 • • 0 0 Ilycioilasc Wcb Intcrfacc m• r M 0 N r 01 r r M M• O M O O M W r W N 0 M• m M W m• r M.O.. W 01 M W O a s M Y1 M O W in M s • m N O T O' O r a• T s M r T W W r M M 0 W m' n O N M r 01 r• 0 N W T 'n M N n 4 T m N u'1 O O v1 a U1 M N M a r r a' M W C a (J r "'� •+ .•+Nr rrr.. r rN N N N NNNM N..rr r N .0 ~• A .0.1 •�. • ^ r N N N 0 n r m r .+ Cr M m r 01 M N 'n N • .11 a N M 0• N r m 'd .m.. IN O r • y1 41 N r 01 N W r W N N M M M N N N W N a Y1 • M O' •0 1 • W N a r MO N O r W M' • r N N .. m M 0 O m n 0 42.C. 43(.1 m r N. . N• • O O r N 10 a s n N N W r M r T m M M 0 r M M M 0. m .. N N .. 01 N Y1 .. .• .. N N N N n M n N n n r• N r M r ..NN N ..r. MM y 9 V O •4 O rO r M W mr a 0 O N a W N M O O a N 0 M 0.NW..00•r••Mn.NOaMraM+ •03 .02 00 W >nVnr.ryNr.MsN•v.1'nYNWNNNM MNNM r.N. N N • W r J1 01 r 10 • W r M N N Y1 O W Q1 O O r W m N 0 O n O W m r M r0 00 N T O. r r 10 u1 a M T 0 n n 1l N N 0 0 4 s m t1 W 01 • 9 '0 r '0 0 0. 0. N a r m .. M Yl M .•1 N M • !1 .t• 'n Y1 41 Y1 Vl 0• .n M N M • N N N M M N .N NN M • 42 W a 0 .r 0.00 •O..ru-1O n r v100 rar O rrM0 mT...+ mM ...DON 0 0 0 0400.4 . '0 O N M o r •= 0 0 • T N r 0101 0 m a 0 N a 0 C U1 N m 0.441 . r 4 N > N N T • 0 M n M N a • 0 4 • W W 0 u1 W M N ti 1 0 N N M M M N 04040404 M 4 a 4 • .140r4 01 rr 040441_ M M OO (40.4004 '0 •• • C O r m • . W • m M '0 m ... N '0 M f1 .. 0 01 C N O' 4.'1%00. T V • 0.m. .. M .. M ... .M.1.4 aY1.(1 4 ... • n N N N N N A r r .MN. 0 ✓ r'0 M M1 r .J A 2 0 41.0 MM NO 0' C y 0' C r 0 O 1 9 W. T 00 r 4 pi O S er 4 0 0 M '0 0 • M N 9U ..$400,... . N• M 01 O N u1 W N r • N O Y1 T• M• M W r r r 0 0 0 .1 0 0.4n.. ... r 0 V 00 NO.+.....0.•.N 00.+0 N... NN.. r,.....00••..+0...+Nr Nr00 r O 017 y X \ ........... \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ............ L. \ \ \ \ \ \14 0 V r r W a 0 N W W N W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 m 0 W 0 0 0 m A W 0 W W W W 0 0 0 WO 4, C 0000000000000000000000000000000.0Z000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U '. 0 C 00O00000O W M 0 000.. W r W T O W O O P O O'nO O C U O N a0 O 0)4 • '04 100 O m 0 0 m• 11 0 01 a W r n N m • .. 0• W QM... ..... NM N 430 W .. L U r•0rr1,04033m003010 O OrO••rO . . . .y •.0 4c 1. 0'414141404041...0404,WO C 0 71 r W V r .0 _ CJ0rM NV On M r r Yr^r W W a s YW n W M1 m m TT m M .Nm ••• tel 9 0Y1°'0a° m .^. 0 rOr0aO,..O a 0CV Cs4 aTrr0rM1 W7 40OMM "4 0 0. =MM M n M M n MMM MM M r N . N- N 101 Z .\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ >4 J 0 0 0 T O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 T a T r n T T m r 0 0 0 0 0 0, 4, rr �' y O 00 000 00 00 01....0...•. .. . 0 2 2 0 > M a N N m • H1 W 0 W m r, 0 T r O O N r .. W O 0 N T O O O 0 0 0 a m N N-r0n00.4N000N.4NN0NONNNr•0.ti0NN..rrr.00..N0 .4 .n \ ............... \ ....... \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 01 \ \ \ \ \ \W N N W N 4n 'n W 11 J1 W W , . 0 aN J1 v1 N n . 41 'n 0:.n O ' a Y1 W4 4 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O W 0 0 0 0 O O 0 u 00-. N m • 0 W r m m 0 .. N M a to W r m T O •. N M• 0 W r m T 0 .. N M • T y -s.W r+ r r r r r r r r m m m m m m a m m m T T T T T T T T T a 0 0 0 Q O O W Y7 T T T T 0% o m T T T T a a a T T "1 T T T T T a m T T a a a m T 00000 > M 0 s C N y 0 0 4 O 0 C 0 a r m Y N O d 0 N r v a a N r ▪ 1 M .+ L ✓ y 2O a .. Soils Map Customer(s): District: Bookcliff Conservation District Date: 6110/2C05 Feld Office: Glenwood Springs Feld Office Agency: Natural Resources Conservation Servi State and County: CO, GARFIELD - ;r =`sib` •II r.>i- raj dr.a ..- F L'4�''.411•.yry� .. t�". zea e"..+ t.onspian Soils Map Rifle Soils 139 65 E 67 7 Image: Garfield County Ortho Mosaic 240 0 240 480 720 960 Feet A • • Non -Technical Descriptions Soil Survey Area: 683 RIFLE AREA, COLORADO, PARTS OF GARFIEL T ♦ \TT \ n,C ♦ !'1 !\ T T\ TTrT e• Map unit: 39 Jerry loam, 12 to 50 percent slopes Description Category: SOI This deep, well -drained soil is on mountainsides. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, and basalt. The surface layer is stony loam about 3 inches thick. The subsoil is cobbly clay loam about 37 inches thick. The substratum is cob bly clay to a depth of 60 inches. Permeability is slow, and available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is very high. Map unit: 65 Torrifluvents, nearly level Description Category: SOI This broadly defined unit consists of deep, well -drained to somewhat poorly drained soils on flood plains. The soils formed in alluvium. These soils are stratified and vary widely it texture and depth. The surface layer ranges from loamy sand and fine s andy loam to silty loam and clay loam. The underlying lavers are generally sandy loam or loam stratified with sand, gravel, and cobbles. The water table fluctuates between depths of 2 and 4 feet and in some years is near the surface during spring runoff. These soils are subject to brief, occasional flooding late in spring and early in summer. Permeability is moderately slow to moderately rapid. Available water capacity is low to high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Map unit: 67 Torriorthents-Rock Outcrop complex, Steep Description Category: SOI This broadly defined unit consists of exposed sandstone and shale bedrock and stony soils that are shallow to moderately deep over sandstone and shale and stony basaltic alluvium. Torriorthents make up about 60 percent of this complex, and Rock outcrop ma kes up about 25 percent. The Torriorthents are on foothills and mountainsides below the Rock outcrop. Torriorthents are very shallow to moderately deep. They are well to somewhat excessively drained. Tney generally are clayey to loamy and contain variable amounts of pebbles, cobbles, and stones. Permeability is slow to moderate, and water holding capaci ty is very low to low. Effective rooting depth is 10 to 40 inches. Runoff is very rapid, and erosion hazard is very high. Rock outcrop is mainly Mesa Verde sandstone and Wasatch Shale. Wednesday, February 08, 2006 Page 1 of 2 • • Map unit: 7 Ascalon -Pena complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: SOI These soils are on sides of valleys and alluvial fans. The soils formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. Ascalon soil makes up about 65 percent of the complex, and Pena sod makes up about 25 percent. The Ascalon is on the less sloping, som ewhat concave parts of the landscape, and the Pena soil is on the steeper, convex parts. The Ascalon soil is deep and well drained. The surface layer is fine sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is sandy clay loam about 30 inches thick. The substratum is sandy clay loam to a depth of 60 inches. Permeability is moderate, and availab le water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches. Runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. The Pena sod is deep and well -drained. The surface layer is about 12 inches thick. The upper part is stony loam, and the lower part is very stony loam. The substratum is very stcny sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches. Permeability is moderate, and avai !able water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moderate. Wednesday, February 08, 2006 Page , or.,