The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.0 CorrespondenceP.O. Box 640 GARFIELD COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602-0640 MEMORA}IDW Phone 945-9158 10: Dennis Stranger, Director Departrnent of Developnent fir.'trt.- l/ /i aqj t'FBe B to" Grrrr, ,._ " :Y8,? '\t,.J FRCtvl: Earl G. Rtrodes C,arf ield County Attorney DATE: February 24, 1983 SUBIECT: fron }4ountain Condominium On February 23, 1983, I nret with Dan Kerst ard have re-done the Resolution to ircorporate his suggestions. Ihat Resolution is ercIosed for your review. Please advise ne if you want any changes. In regards to the p1at, I have reviewed the same, and it neets with my approval. f have requested, from Dan Kerst, a cotry of the Condominiun Declarations. I will advise you separately of my review of that matter. /sr Errclosure xc: Dan Kerst ScupNx & KERSr ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 2OI. AI7 COLORADO AVENUE GLEN\T'OOD SPRINGS, COI-ORA-DC) AIsOI (303) 94s-2447 JOHN R. SCHENK DAN KERST WILLIAM J. DEWINTER JOHN D. PHILLIPS ilt February 15, I983 Mr. Earl G. Rhodes Garfield County Attorney County Attorneyrs Office Glenwood Springs, CO. gl60f Re: Iron Mountain Condominiums Dear Earl: 1. Condition No. I on page 2 of thethe septic systen should uore prqperly be a 2. Condition No. 3 on page 2 shouldfollowing suggested language: I have reviewed your draft of Resolution granting the SubdivisionExeuption request of Iron Mountain Investments, Ltd. and would make thefollowing comments: That the utility companies serving the subj ect property havesubmitted written confirmation of the provision of utility servicesto the proposed subdivision. The Resolution otherwise appears acceptable, with former conditions2, 4 and, 5 either satlsfied or in the process of being satisfied.Dennls stranger indicated that he would provide you a copy of therevised Condoroinium Map for the Iron Mountain Condominiums for yourreview of the certificates thereon. I would note in this regard, that Ihave revised the Certification of Ownership and other certificates toreflect the condominium nature of the project. please let me know lfyou have any questions or comments in this regard. Yours very truIy, DK/rc cc: Iron Mountain Investments, Ltd. Dennis Stranger FEB r 7 p83 0np*i2 uir- proposed Resolution regarding finding. also be a finding with the " i-r-* Itr) ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.P.O, BoX 7oO . GLENWOOo SpRtNGS, COLORADO ao6o1 . (3o3) s4s-aG14 September 15, L9g2 r-----=TRl : ,lll SEP30tsge ;il GAIifittJ UJ. rt'uiiriiR Garfield County planner Glenwood Springs, Colorado Gentlemen: Reference the four apartments which make up the quadraplex locatedat 4902, 4904, 4906, and 49oB ' t54 noad wlich is owned by rronMountain rnvestments, Ltd. we are presently serving these fourunits with one service. Each unit Las its lr. g." meter and theoccupants of each unit pay for their individual gas biII. condominiumization of these units will cause us no problems asthere will be no changes in gas service necessary as a result ofthis change in ownership. tn fact, we feel that owner occupantswill provide us with a more stable custom€r as-r.rra"." tend to movemore often than do owners. LELAND F. HINES, Manager Glenwood Springs District Office LFI{/s j Respectfully submitted, ,(2.*/l- ;,L**"-o: HOLY CROSS -Ltr,C-fRIC ASS( ]IATION, INC. 1301 GRAND AVENUE P. O. DRAWER 250 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8I60I September 13, L982 ROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Grangeu,General lvlanager ELG: Is z cc:Duane Van Why Garfield County planner Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Gentlemen: Reference the {9ot apartments which make up the quadraplex located at4902t 4904,4906 and 4908 - 154 Road, which.r" o-*rr"d by rronMountain rnvestments, Ltd. We are presently serving these four unitswith separate services. Each unit -has its ovrn electric meter and theoccupants of each unit pay for their individual electric service. Condominiumization of these units will cause us no problems as therewill be no changes in electrical service necessary as a result ofthis-change in ownership. rn factr w€ feel that 6wner occupants willprovide us with a more stable customer as renters tend to m6ve rmrchmore often than do owners. Respectfully submitted, AREAo3CODE 945 - 549t F*,arr?Tn*rn e45'60s6 , ,i ii c*rynn m **luOd Page 10, P1;,nning Cornrnission Meeting of Scpt. 8, 7982 t(. and Bramelea has no intention of putting a groceny store on the pnoperty. Howefen, l'1r. Brown has an option to purchaser this property and two chains for grocery stores liave expressed interest in putting in a store. No fir"m agneement has been made, due to intenest rates. Mn. Bnown submitted a letten to Mn. Stranger reganding the planning staffrs concenns and addressed them to the staffrs satisfaction. Evelyn McKay moved to r"ecommend appnoval to the Boand of County Commissionersof the West Glenwood Shopping Mal1 sketch plan and modification of the PUD with the following conditions: t. Landscaping anound the new building and parking lot shal-l continue the pattenn existing in the present development. 2. Parking spaces fon handicapped persons using the store will be provided as per the letten of Septemben B, 7982 fnom William F. Bnown, Jr. 3. Bus stop locations wil-1 be modified pen the letten of Septemben 8,7982 fnom Wifliam F. Bror.n, Jn. 4. The lighting plan for the development will continue the existing patter:n. 5. The developen shall receive lette:: sof commitment to serve fnom the waten and sewer: distnicts pr"ior to review of the Preliminary P1an. 6. Hotel- uses shall be eliminated from the second zoning district. 7. Parking spaces will be 5.5 pen 1000 square feet of building area.( 5 par.king spaces pen 1000 squane feet of office area). B. rrTractrr be used to describe the parcels within the subdivision. 9. Tnact G uses shall be fimited to parking lot and l-andscaping. 10. Curbs, guttens and sidewalks wifl be pnovided along the east side of the county road. Al]an Bowles seconded the motion; Motion carnied unanimously. IRON MOUNTAIN ]NVESTMENTS/SKETCH PLAN AND REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM FURTHER SUBDIVISION Dennis Strangen reviewed the request to divide an existing fourplex into four" condominium units located approximately 5% miles south of Gfenwood Springs on the north side of County Road 154. He noted the building meets the UBC requirements, acconding to Bud Milnen, the Building Official. Mr:. Strangen stated the request is also to exempt the developer from going through the fulI subdivision neview basically because the request is to fragment the owner- ship of an existing buiJ-ding. He noted the recommendation from the staff is fon appr"oval of both sketch plan and exemption fnom the full subdivision review with conditions Mr. Kerst, the representative for the project, stated he agreed with all the conditions of appr:oval. He stated he had met with the State Engineen and the attonney for the Basal-t Water Conservancy Distnict and he was almost sure that a wel1 permit Page 10, Pl .rnnjlrg Co:runission Meeting of Scpt. B, 1982,*/i( and Bramelea has no intention of putting a gnocery store on the property. Hovrefer, 1,1r. Bnown has an option to purchaser this property and two chains fon gnocery stores l:ave expressed intenest in putting in a stone. No firm agneement has been made, due to interest rates. Mn. Bnovm submitted a letten to Mr. Stranger reganding the planning staffrs concerns and addressed them to the staffrs satisfaction. Evelyn McKay moved to recommend appnoval to the Boand of County Commissionens of the West Glenwood Shopping MalI sketch plan and modification of the PUD with the following conditions: 7. Landscaping around the new building and panking lot shall continue the pattenn existing in the pnesent development. 2. Parking spaces for handicapped persons using the stone will be provided as per the letter- of September 8, 1982 fnom Wil-liam F. Br:own, Jr. 3. Bus stop locations will be modified per the letten of September 8,7982 from William F. Br.own, Jr:. 4. The }ighting plan fon the development wiIl continue the existing pattern. 5. The developer shall neceive fetten sof commitment to serve from the waten and sewer districts pnior to r'eview of the Preliminary P1an. 6. Hotef uses shall be e.l-iminated from the second zoning district. 7. Parking spaces will be 5.5 per: 1000 squa:re feet of bui.l-ding area.(5 parking spaces pe:r 1000 square feet of office area). 8. rrTractrr be used to descr-ibe the pancels within the subdivision. 9. Tract G uses shall be fimited to parking lot and landscaping. 10. Curbs, guttens and sidewal-ks wil-l- be provided along the east side of the county road. Allan Bowl-es seconded the motion; Motion car::ied unanimously. IRON MOUNTAIN ]NVESTMENTS/SKETCH PLAN AND REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM FURTHER SUBDIVIS]ON REVIEW. Dennis Strangen reviewed the r:equest to divide an existing fourplex into foun condominium units located approximately 5% miles south of Glenwood Springs on the nonth side of County Road 154. He noted the buitding meets the UBC requirements, accor:ding to Bud Milnen, the Building Official-. Mn. Strangen stated the request is also to exempt the developer from going through the full subdivision neview basically because the request is to fragment the owner- ship of an existing building. He noted the recommendation fnom the staff is fon approval of both sketch plan and exemption from the full subdivision review with conditions Mr. Kerst, the nepnesentati.ve for the project, stated he agreed with all the conditions of approval. He stated he had met with the State Engineen and the attorney fon the Basalt VJaten Conservancy Distriet and he was almost sure that a wel-I per"mit wou.Id be issued as soon as the Basalt Water^ Distr"ict submitted a written plan of ser.vice to the state. They wiII also be filing fon a municipal welI. Chairman Mackley felt the parking situation was inadequate for the fourplex. 0n a site inspection, he concluded it was too narnow. Dr. Bowles agreed with this state- ment. Mn. Ker^tst said a panking plan would be submitted, including landscaping. Mn. Albertson objected to the mechanics of going thnough the Basalt Waten Distnict to get watel? out of Ruedi to satisfy a fourplex. The administrative ability to bring water out of Ruedi to satisfy one municipal well 5 miles away didnrt make sense. Mns. Lorah didntt like all the variances involved to get the fourplex where it was today. Dale ALbertson moved to recommend to the Boand of County Commissioners to have the fnon Mountain Investments Company go th::ough the full subdivision process. Mrs. Lorah seconded the motion. A po1I was taken of the voting member:s: A.l-ber"tson: yes; McKay: nol Lorah: yes;, Bowles: yes; Mackley: yes. Motion carnied. Dale Albel"tson moved to ::ecommend appnoval of the fron Mountain fnvestments sketch plan with the following conditions: t. A site plan be prepared at a scale adequate to eval-uate the parking and the scneening of tnash receptacle. 2. The applicant proposes to utilize an existingrntell. Prion to final plat approval, the Division of Waten Resour.ces shoul-d indicate approval of the waten source. 3. The utiltiy companies should submit wnitten appnoval of the pr:ovision of utiltiy se::vices. 4. The county r^oad night-of-way should be shown on the Final PIat. 5. A site plan should be pr.epared as part of the condominium documents. The site plan should address the folfowing elements: a. Landscaping; b. Panking (including delineation of the access points and the etimination of the continuous dr:iven pen the necommendation of the County Road Super:vison); c. The scneening of the trash neceptacle and verification that the neceptacle is 1ocated outside of thb county ::ight-of-way; d. The applicant should investigate an altennate panking area.