HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report PC 01.12.92REQUES'r':
APILICANI'S:
ENGINEERS:
LOCATION:
SITE DATA:
WATER:
SEWER:
ACCESS:
EXISTING ZONING:
ADJACENI ZONING:
PROJE(]I IN ITORMA'I'ION AND S'I'AFF COMME,NI'S
Prince Creek Estates
Sketch Plan
David & Connie flicks
PC Ut2t94
Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc.
Aparcel of land located in aportion
of Soctions 10, ll and 15, T.8S.
R88W; more practically described as
a tract of land located
approximately two (2) miles south
of Carbondale, offof County Roatl
I I l.
The site consists of 121.588 acres.
Shared Wells
I.S.D.S. systems.
County Road lll
A/R/RD
A/R/RT)
Subdivision
L RFLAI-IONSHIP'IO T'IIE COMPRI}IIITNSIYF-EtAI{
The subject property is located in District C - Rura.l Areas Minor Environmental
Constraints as shown on the Garfield County Conrprehensive Plzur Mzmagement
Districts Map.
IL DE,SCRIPTTON OF TTIE PRQPOSAL
A. Sitelercrintion: The property is bound on the west by the Crystat River and
on the east by County Road lll. To the north and south are agriculLural
properties and along a porl.ion olthe southem property line are small 2Lo 5 acre
residential lots. Access to the site is provided via County Road lll, which
accesses State Highway 133 across from the State Fish Hatchery.
The property gently slopes to the Crystal River at approximately 5-10 percent
grade, with the slope decreasing to approximaLely 4 percent as the property
approaches the river. Vegetation includes native grasses in the historic pasture
areas, with coLtonwoods al<lng the banks of the river. T'he regulated floodplain
is contained within the bank system, and does not appear to impact any
potential building sites within the subdivision. T'he only structures on the
property is the main residence and other agricultural buildings.
B. The applicants are proposing to split the 121.588 acre parcel into six (6) parcels
of 2.0 acres in size. The llicks intend on re[aining the 109.588 aore parcel with
the existing structures. All of the new lots would utilize a proposed 60 ft. access
easement off of County Road I I l. Domestic water will be provided by two"
domestic wells approved by State Division of Water Resource permits.
Sewage disposal will be handled by ISDS. The predominate soils on the site
include the Evanston Loam, which only has severe restrictions for ISDS and
dwelling construction for areas with steep slopes. 1'he proposed new lots have
slopes of 8-12%. Percolation tests will be required prior to Preliminary PIan.
m.S.TAI]F COMMEI\TI.S
Soilsfl'onography: The soils noted previously have severe constraints for aref,s
with steep slopes. The 8% Lo l2o/o slopes for the new lots are not considered
steep slopes and as such, should not presen[ a constraint. The areas adjacent to
the swale going tlrrough the small lots is a strong sandy loam, that has severe
limitations for absorption Iields for an ISDS.
Roads/Access: All lots access off of an easement coming offof County Road
I I l. This easement will have to be improved to County road standards, which
would require it to be a publicly dedicated road, with a minimum right-of-way
40 ft. wide, with two (2) eight (8) ft. wide driving lanes and the rest of the
standards for a semi-primitive road as defined in the subdivision regulations.
Additionally, the road must have a cul-de-sac with a 45 ft. radius or a T-shaped
turnaround with a 50 ft. radius.
Fire ProLection: The subject property is within the Carbondale Rural Fire
Protection District. The fire district has not commented on the proposal.
T ot Design: The proposed lots are all designed to have what appears to be a
building envelope 100 ft x 100 ft. If this is intended to provide consistency for
the location of house, we would suggesl" that this issue be dealt with by covenant,
rather than def,rning them on a hnal plat. ln general, there is no real creative
thought given to the layout of these lots.
Additional Agency Comments:
l. nivision of Water Resources: The Division staffhave noted that the well
permits noted previously as the source of water have some limitations. As
permitted, only one.w-ell is legally capable of providing water to three dwellings
(See letler pages Lf( d l.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
2
F.The Sketch Plan process is purel y inlorma tio nal. Completion of the sketch Plan
process does not constitute approval of the proposed plan.
T'he Sketch Plan cornments shall be valid Ibr a period not to ex<red one (l) year
from the date of the Planning Cornrnission review. If a Prelirninary I'>lan for the
proposed subdivision is not presented to the Garl-reld County Plaming
Cormnission within this period, the applicant shall submit an updated Sketch
Plan application to the Planning Division for review and comparison with the
original application.
(ff*""rA -a-zztfrr,-/ ""@ //L bDf+
as //,L ,€,0, ot),
-$ryTur^4*i/; 0,0*0/A-vLL7L 4['**/ M tuL( '
tba,: r-,v. rfrryik-7^1:'*1,,-#5,;r"r/^^ro(- I /-1"/hu- "i/-U .
*g,Ua-cal- (l b't't-l V,ttuZL":il//.T'.#,j -o
irts rtl'fu"'*-2 *:u*(i'io o; I .'KYU /t'L-' L'Y-
J 7/r_c-ca- /-rfrarfrr,z Mrl-aflk-n"fl. u*-' *
WWfr ";;il az/p*-e///,
STArt Ot. eolot(ADo
OTT]CE OT I I IE SIAI E TNGINEIR
Divisit-rrr of Water Res<turces
Depar ltnent o[ Natural llesources
|,l I J Shcrnrarr Streel, Roorrr 8l I
l)enver, Coloraclo 80201
l'horre (l0l) 866-358I
rAX (103) 86(,-15U9 Roy Ronrer
Covernor
Ken Salazar
fxecutive Director
llal t). Sinrpson
State Engineer
I)eccnrber 22, 1993
Mr. Dave Michaelson, Planrrer
Garfield Coultty ISuilding and l,lannirrg
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
t r IUi: Prince Creek Estates Subtlivision
SW l/4, Section l[, T'8 S, R 88 W,6th lr.M.
Water Division 5, Water District j8
Dear Dave:
Tltank you for tlte re[erral for a six lot subdivision. T'lre applicalrts, David atrd Connie
Ilicks, are proposillg to create six single-farnily lots o[ approxinrirtely two acres eacll. T'he proposerl
water supply lbr tlris subdivision is l"o be frorn tlre sharccl use of two tlonrestic wells, pernlit nos.
105764 arrd 174240.
' Pursuattt to Section 30-28-136(h)(l), C.R.S. 1973, the State Errgineer's Office o[[ers the
followirlg opillioll for your consideraLiort regarding nratcrial irrjury to decreccl wrter rights and tlle
adequacy o[ the prnposed watcr supply:
The two tlotuesl"ic well penllits were issued as the only wcll on l)arcels o[ 35 acres or lllore.'flte use of perlnit no. 174240 is lirnited to ordinary household purposes inside tlrree (3) sirrgle falnily
dwellittgs, the irrigatiott of not Ittore than one ftcre oI horrrc Ialrrs nud garderrs, arrd the watering <lI
dornestic anilnals.
Tlteuseo[pernritntl. l05TS4islinritedtoordinaryhouseholdpurposesirrsirleolle(l)sirrgle
fatttily dwelling, the irrigation o[ lrot nurre lhan ons acre o[ fiolre lawrrs ald garderrs, aptl t5e
waterillg of poultry, dolrtesl.ic anituals, ard livestock on a fanll or ranch. 'I'his pertrrit curreutty
canllot serve lllore tltalt otte single-fanrily dwelling. Our present policy on tlorlestic wells lilnits t5e
use to olle sillgle-farnily dwelling unless the a;rplicant specitietl ntore thalt one dwellilrg on the
application fornr. As of Jattuary l, 1994, we will anrerrtl donrestic penrrits issued as the only well
on 35 acres or tttore to indicate they can serve three sirrgle-fanrily drvellings i[ the followilrg
docunrents are sutrntit"ted to this office:
[. A letter, signed by tlre applicant, requcsting anrerrtlrnent of l.he penllil., and specitying the
uses desirecl.
Mr. Dave Michaelson
Decernber 22, 1993
2. If the applicant for the atrtetrdnrerrt is not tlre origilral applicant oI recortl,
for a chatlge itt owlterslrip/address (Fonn No. GWS-l l) and a copy oI a deerl
are tlte owner(s) of the 35* acres tlescribed in the existiltg well flerlnit.
l'age 2
arr aplrlicatiorr
showirrg they
3. A legal dcscription o[ the 3.5*- acre tract, i[ tlrat inf<rrrnation lras not alrearly beerr
subrniil.ed.
Itt order to assure tltat a perlltalrent waLer supl)ly rvill be available on an equitable basis to
Iots, rve reconllllen(l the ftrllowilrg:
l.I'he wells slxruld [re locatetl on an outlot owned in colurnorr by atl property owllers
usilrg tlte wclls. Access to the wells antl the riglrt to establish and ntaintain'pipelines
shall be ;lrovided lry easentents whcre necessary.
I'he wells should be j<rintly orvlretl by the lot owrrers.
Covettaltts attd/or otlter tneclranisnrs should establish a lot owrrers association with
powers to lttake decisions cortcernirrg nratrflgenrerrt arrd o;terati<lrr of the wells. A
j<lint lnaitrtellallce agreetttent is a requirecl part of such an associatign.
Use tlf tlte two dolttestic wells rnay be shared betweerr tlre proposed lots as lorrg as^ ilre
individual ctllttlitiolts oI approval on eaclt perrnit are cclrrrplietl witl arxl tle linritatiols 01 use are
not exceeded. This will reqtrire Llrat pertnit lro. 105764 lle anrended to iltlicate it cap serve tlrree
single-falrrily dwellings. No atlditional well pernrits will be available 01 the two 35* acre parcels
designated by the existirrg well perrniLs without a plan lor augltrelrtatiop approvetl by water iourt.
Under current statutcs antl policies, tlre proposed water supply appears adequal.e, and there
is a presunrptiort of no Ittaterial injury to decreed water rights. Shotiltl yll trave ftirtlrer questions
or colllllleltts regardittg the water supl)ly fur this project, please cogtact tfuis oftice at tlre above
address.
Sincerely,
fin l'rz'*
Je[f Deatherage
Water Resources Elrgineer
Orlyn Bell, Division Errgilteer
Joe Bergquist, Wal.er Corrunissioner
prince.sub
.|
3.
t,,r t, i I,,i i'i:l:,.:l
:.i :,
,,.|
'ir..liii:',i,
i ,i. ''rr:ri i:lr ,i
,:l:,
' :i t. :
:'-.i.,, rlr ,i
t,
:!i