Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.00 Application Part 1sfaff C.?t
The Ra rds
On the Colorado
Zone District Amendment Apptication - pUD
and
Subdivision Application - Preliminary plan
104 Singte-Family Residentiat units t'
October 5, 2006
Mark Bean
Director of Building and Planning of Garfield County
108 Eighth Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Application - Zone District Amendment - The Rapids on the Colorado PUD
Application - Preliminary Plan - The Rapids on the Colorado PUD
Dear Mr. Bean
Attached is a check in the amount of S450.00 for processing the attached Apolication
Zone District Amendment and a check in the amount o $675.00 for processing the attached
Subdivision Aoplication - Preltmtnarv Plan.
It is requested that the two applications be processed simultaneously.
As you are aware, paved roads, a public water system, natural gas, telephone,
electricity and fire protection are available in the existing subdivision.
The'pod' cluster design, utilized in the attached applications, addresses issues the
Planning Commission, Staff, review agencies and the public noted in the public hearing on
August 9, 2006. ln addition, the applications comply with the provisions of the Memorandum
of Undelstanding between the Town of New Castle and the applicants. The applications are
also in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan 2000 provisions and map "Land Use.
Districts. &udv Areas 2 & 3. Garfield Countr that designates the property as 'Sg&E[tsion-
Within Two Mile Sphere of lnfluence (New Castlel".
The proposed planned unit development "pod" cluster design provides l(X single'
family lots with 65.60lo open spaoe. A tot lot, basketball court, sports field, fishing pond and
hiking trails are incorporated into the design to encourage neighbofiood youth activities.
The trails will be open for public use during daylight hours.
lf you have questions regarding the applications, please contact Chris Hale at
Mountain Cross Engineering for planning issues (970-945-5!44), l-ss Leavenworth for legal
issues (970-9f5-2261) or Gene R. Hilton (303-79&1O40) for other matterc.
Your assistance and support will be appreciated.
Gene R. Hilton,
Gene R. Hilton, lndividual
Gene R. Hilton, President
Mary J. Hilton, lndividual
RPUD. I 04.B. TrEnsrnittal Lf.doc'-1-
Table of Contents
Section
Paoe
Letter of Transmittal.
Table of Contents """""""""""2r
Erbting Subdivision. """"""""4
Location..... """""4
Sitc Improvements........... """*7
Colorado Revised Stetutes -TnningReview Standards - SuMivision Resolutions...-........""""t
Comprehensive Plan - Urban Area of Influence.....""' """":"""""""""""""'9
Proposed Land Use District$ Study Areas 2 &S,GarIield County Colorado Map"""""""""9b
lMite Area Phn, Town of New castle, Garlield count5r, colorado.... .................9c
Complience Comprehensive Plen Goals, Obiectives, Policies end Progrems""""""""""'-'9-13
Reasonable Relationship to Welfare of the Community""""' """'l+17
Section ll - Zone District Amendment Application
Zone District Amendment Application Form......... ""'1y27
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation. """"""""'20
Town of Ncw Cestle Comprehensive Plrrn-..... """""""'21
Reasonable Relationship To General Welfare of the Community """" """"""21-?3
Previous Determinations of Compliance With The Comprehensive P|en....."""""-"""""""23
Complience - Section 4.fi) - Zoning Regutation """""2&50
Subdivision Aoolication Form - Preliminarv PIan ...5:2-59
Comoliance -Scction 4.U) - Subdivision Regul,rtion..
Compliancc-Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan.."" """"""'tE
Complience - Comprehensive Plan 2000 - Section m.l0' Urban Area of Influence
Goals, Obiectives, Policics And Programs....."""' """"" 8&93
Planned Unit Devetopment Purpose and Design Obiectives" """'9$100
Planned Unit Development Compliance rtith Scction 4.t."""""' """""""101-102
Reasonable Relationship To General Wetfare of Community""""""" """"10$106
Planned Unit Development Compliance With Comprehensive Phn 2m0 PUD""""""""1fi7-10!)
Heelth, Safety and Welfare """11X'
t8
..51
RPUD.104.C RA/..Table of Contents.doc
Exhibits
The Rapids on the Colorado
Proposed Planned Unit Development
Volume L -
$!!bit [-Section IlL Comprehensive Plan 20fi) Areas 2 & 3
@-Pretiminary Plan MaP (lf X 17)
Exhibit 3 -Town of New Castle Memorandum of Understanding
Erhibit 4 - Rnpids on the Colorado Eristing Plat and B(rcC Resolutions 'lN'7O rmdlfil-26
Erhibit 5-Map of 'As Built'Roads and Utilities
Exhibit 6 - Garlield county comprehensive Plan Map Land use Districts
Exhibit 7 - Map - Current Zoning of the Propcrty
E$lbit 8-Vicintty MaP
Exhibit 9 - Assessor's Map & Addresses of Adiacent Owners
Exhibit 10 - Legal Description of Property
Volume 2
Exhibit 1l - I)eeds, Easementg Bill of salg Memorandum of understanding
Erhibit 12 - Deed - Hilton Open Space Tract
Exhibit 13 - Title Insurance Commitment
Exhibit 14 - rilright Water Engineers - Water Supply Analysig Augmentation Plrrn, West Divide
Contract, Permits, Pump Tests, State Approval of Design'
Exhibit 15 - Traflic Anatysis - County Road 335 - (Mountain Cross Engineering)
Exhibit 16 - Drainage Report and PIen (Mountein cross Engineering)
Bilibit 17 -Soils Hazard Map, Soils Type Map and Department of Agriculture Ilcscriptions
Erhibit 18 - Slope Ilezerd MaP
Erhibit 19 - Geologr and Subsurface Soits (Lincoln-Devore)
Exhibit 20 - Maps - Elk and Mule Deer Concentrations
Erhibit 2l - Certitication for placement of Fill In Accordance With Ftoodplain Speciat Use Permit'
Floodptein Special Use Permit, X'toodplain Map C-lt
Erhibit 22 - Protective Covenants
Exhibit 23 - Repids on the Colorado Homeownerc Association Articles of Incorporation and By-Lrws
Exhibit 24 - Sen'ice Letters - Utility Companies
Exhibit 25 - Meps - Roed Plen and Profiles @risting end Additional); Existing and Propmcd Utitity Line
RPUD. I 04.C REV..Table of Contents.doc
Volume 3 - Attachments
Attachment 1. - Traflic Impact Study - The Repids on the Colorado.
Amendment- Traflic Impact Study-The Rapids on the Colorado
Attachment 2 -Site Location Application and Report - Addendum (lVastewater Treatment Feciti$)
Attachment 3 -Site Location Application and Report (Wastewater Treatment Fecility
Attachment 4-Public Watcr System - The Rapids on the Colorado
RPUD.I0.I.Q REV..Tabl€ of Contents.doc 4 tw4t20,}6
The Rapids on the Colorado PUD
sEcTtoN t
Summalv. The attached Zone District Amendment Application requests the
existing g7,26g-acre Rapids on the Colorado subdivision and an adiacent 24.219'
acre tract be rezoned from A/l and A/R/RD to Ptanned Unit Development (PUD). ln
addition, a Subdivision Application - Preliminary Plan is submitted requesting
approval to subdivide the property into 104 single-family lots, one wastewater
treatment site and 79.747 acres of open space and utilities. The proposed PUD
density would be 0.856 dwelling units per acre.
Existins Subdivieion. The Rapids on the Cotorado subdivision is an existing
platted subdivision with paved roads, an existing water system with a 150,000-gallon
storage tank, fire hydrants, underground electricity, telephone and natural gas. The
existing utilities will serve approximately 92 of the proposed 104lots-
Location. The property is located on C. R. 335, in unincorporated Garfield
County, one mile west of Apple Tree Mobile Home Park on the south side of the
Colorado River. The site adioins the Colorado River on the north and GarfeH Cleek
on the east boundary. A vicinity map is shown below.
RPUD. 1 04.D.Sec I Zoning.Subdivision.doc
site lmprovements. The existing Rapids on the colorado subdivision has
paved roads, a public water system including wells, a water treatment facility, a
150,000-gallon water storage tank, water distribution lines to each site and fire
hydrants. ln addition, underground electricity, telephone and natural gas service are
extended to each lot. The Moore Ditch/Pipelines parallels G.R' 335 and will be used
to provide non-potable water for irrigation of lawns, open space and amenity tracts'
Public Wabr Svstem The existing Rapids
public water system includes two wells that produce 105
gallons per minute, a 150,000gallon water storage tank,
water distribution lines, valves, pumps, controls, water
treatment facility; easements for access roads, a site for
the 150,000-storage tank and pipelines.
Capacity of the tank is sufficient to meet maximum
daily in-house and fire protection demands of the PUD'
RAP'DS WELLNO.2
No. 1 Not Shown
WATER SYSIEM
CONIROL PANEL
NON-POTABLE I RRI GAT ION
PIPELINE- MOORE DITCH
Fire protection is provided throughout the existing Rapids
subdivlsion utilizing a 150,000-gallon water storage tank, six-
inch water distribution lines and fire hydrants within 300 feet of
each lot. The Fire Protection District station No. 3 is located
one mile east at Apple Tree. The Buming Mountain Fire
Protection District has approved the water storage require-
ments, fire standpipe and hydrant spacing of the proposed 1o4-
unit PUD.
RFUD. 1 04.D.Sec I Zoning.Subdivision.doc 'tot5t2006 '' *v
Electricitv. The Rapids subdivision is within the service area of Holy Cross Energy.
Holy Cross Energy has installed underground electric conduits, lines and
transformers throughout the subdivision. Additional underground electric line
extensions and transformers may be required to provide service to the proposed
additionat lots located along the road extensions shown on the preliminary plan map.
After aPProval of the final Plat,
Holy Cross Energy will design the line
and transformer locations ne@ssary to
deliver adequate power to and within
the proposed Rapids on the Colorado
Planned Unit DeveloPment.
The photograph on the left shows
one of twelve transformers that are
instalted on the property to provide
electric service to the subdivision.
Telephone. The Rapids on the Colorado suMivision is provided telephone service
by Qwest. Underground telephone lines and service pedestals are
installed in the subdivision and provide telephone service to each
lot.
The proposed increase in the number of housing units on
the property may require installation of an additional large cable to
the PUD with sufficient pairs of lines for telephones, intemet,
security and other residential uses. A large telephone cable and
distribution facility is located within 400 feet of the property
boundary.
The photograph on the right shows one of 20 pedestals that
are installed in the existing subdivision to provide telephone service to each lot.
A tetter is attached from Qwest acknowledging that the property is located within their
service area and that Qwest will provide service.
RPUD. 1 04.D.Sec I Zoning.Subdivbion.doc 10/5r20p6
Natural Gas.. Xcel Energy provides service to the subdivision based on tariffs filed
with and approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission.
In 1997, approximately 1O,OOO feet of natural gas lines were extended from Apple
Tree and along both sides of the roads within the Rapids on the Colorado
subdivision. All natural gas facilities are underground. A photograph of installation is
not available.
Subdivision Roads The Rapids on the Colorado subdivision has three internal
roads that were dedicated to public use when the Rapids on the Colorado
subdivision plat was recorded. The three roads connect to C.R. 335 for access to
lnterstate 70 at New Castle (Exit 105) and at Silt (Exit 97).
The existing subdivision roads were constructed to Garfield County specifications
and were paved with two inches of asphalt. The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners
Association maintain the internal subdivision roads.
RPUD. 1 04.D.Sec I Zoning.Subdivision.doc 1015t2006
Colorado Revised Statutes - Zonins Review Standards. The Colorado
Revised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review for rezoning land in
the County. The standard used for reviewing a rezoning request that is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan is the prooosed rezonino need onlv bear a
reasonable relationshio to the oeneralwelfare of the communitv.
Garfield Countv Zonino and Subdivision Reoulations. Garfteld County has
adopted Zoning Regulations and Subdivision Regulations that guide subdivision and
zoning actions within the County. ln addition, the Gounty has adopted a
Comprehensive Plan 2000 that provides a general statement of direction for land use
planning in unincorporated Garfield County.
Gomprehensive Plan - Urban Area of lnfluence The Gomprehensive Plan
2000 establishes Goals, Obiectives, Policies and Programs regarding land use within
three miles of municipalities. ln compliance with a Comprehensive Program 10.1, the
County prepared a map Prcposed Land Use Districts. Studv Areas 2 & 3. Garfreld
Countv. Colorado. (Attached as Exhibit 6). The Rapids property is classified on the
Comprehensive Plan Map as SubdMsion Within TwoMite Soherc of tnfluence (Town
of New Castlel.
The Comprehensive Plan 2000 also incorporates several municipal maps
including the "
map. The "Three Mile Area Plan" specffies land uses and densities that the Town of
Nal Gastle visualizes for the area.
The Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan map applies a classification of
'Cluster-Low Densitv-Reside l" to the Rapids property. The classification, in other
Torn of New Casfle regulations, re@mmends a densitv of one unit per acre.
RPUD.I O4.D.Soc I Zoning.Subdivision.doc
t. COMPLIANGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2OOO
The proposed Rapids on the Colorado PUD is within three miles of the Town
of New Castle and is therefore considered to be within an Urban Area of lnfluence as
defined in Garfield County's Comorehensive Plan 2000.
The Rapids on the Colorado Application for a Zone District Amendment and
Subdivision Application, because of the location of the property within one mile of
New Castle, is subject to the following Comprehensive Plan 2000 Urban Area of
Influence Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs:
1. GOAL= Prcmote development in and arcund existino communiti*
Responee: The Proposed PUD is an existing subdivision, near New Castle
with four houses constructed and a three-year build-out planned. lncreasing
density within the existing subdivision, as requested in the Applications, is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Goal.
GOAL: Ensure that develooment and overall land use oolicas occqninq
in frte Countv that will aff*t land use of a municipalihr arc ampatible
wiilt the existina zonino and fufitre land use obi*tiv* of the aooropriate
municioalittr.
ResDonse:
Reference Response to Para. 6 below. The Town of New Casfle and the
Applicants have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU) that
complies with the goal stated above. The MOU is attached as Exhibit "6".
3. OBJEGTIVE: Rebin local characbr oufsiiop. of communitv limi6.
Reeponse:
RPUD.I 04.D.S€c I Zoning.SuMivision.doc 913012006
The Cluster Design, used in the proposed PUD, increases open space to
65.6% of the gross area of the PUD and establishes protections that limit use
of the open space. The location and design of the proiect retains the rural
character of the area.
O&IECTIVE: Development that reouires urban seryices will be
encouraqed to locate in arcas where these services aro available.
Response:
The proposed PUD is an existing subdivision with paved roads, public water
system, natural gas, electricity, telephone and amenities in place.
Utilization of the existing infrastructure for additional density complies with the
Comprehensive Plan Objective.
OBJEGTIVES: Development in an Urban Aroa of lnfluence wil! have
street patterns that are compatible with the affected municipalitv.
Response:
The Proposed PUD is an existing subdivision that has a road system
constructed and in place. The road system is compatible with the adjoining
C.R. 335 as to visibility and traffic volume. Street designations will be in
compliance with the area streets.
POLIGIES: Gomorehensive Planninq and Zonino Resolution revisions.
Zone District Amendments and individual proiects within defined Urban
Areas of lnf,uence. will be consistent with Iocal land use oolicies.
Response:
The Application Zone District Amendment and Subdivision Application
Preliminary Plan, submitted for the proposed Rapids on the Colorado PUD,
4.
5.
6.
RPUD.r04.D.Sec I Zonhg.Subdivision.doc 10
are subject to this Gomprehensive Plan Policy. The. Proposed Rapids on the
Colorado PUD is within the Urban Area of lnfluence of the Town of New
Gastle.
The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Policy essentially requires Zone
District Amendments and individual proiects within Urban Areas of lnfluenoe to
complv with the municioalitv's Comprehensive Plan as opposed to the County
Comprehensive Plan.
ln accordance with the Comprehensive Plan 2000 Policy, the Town of Nerr
Gastle and the Applicants have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) in which:
{ Town acknowledges that, based upon the provisions of the MOU, the
PUD is in substantial compliance with the Town's Plan
{ Town of Neur Gastle requests that the BOGC approve the applications.
The attached Memorandum of Aqreement, Exhibit "3", approved by the Toum
Board of the Town of New Castle and the Appticants, specifies in great detail
the requirements the proposed Planned Unlt Development must meet to be in
compliance with the Town of New Gastle Gomprehensive Plan. Based upon
the Memorandum of Understanding, the Town of New Castle and the
Applicants have agreed to the following MOU provisions:
1 ."Subject to the provisions of the Memorandum of
Agreement, the Town shall consent to and recommend to the
BOCC that it recommend approval of the Site ADolication for
the Facilitv."
2. "The Town agrees that many elements of the
proposed PUD, including clustering, dedication of open spaoe,
preseruing the hillside as open spaoe and the like although
not in strict compliance with the Comprehensive Plan as to
density. The Town supports the PUD because of its
RPt D.lO4.D.Soc I Zonlng.Subdivbion.doc 11
substantial compliance with its Comprehensive Plan as noted
above, the provision for a pubtic trailwith river access, and the
provision for a wastewater treatment facility with proposed use
as provided herein, provided however, that any such support
is contingent upon compliance by Rapids with the provisions
of this paragraph, and further, so long as the PUD proposal is
consistent with the following conditions:. - - . . . .'
SUilltlARY - Consistencv With Local Land Use Plans. The Town of New
Casle has acknowledqed that the proposed PUD is in substantial compliance
with the Town of New Castle Comorehensive Plan and supports the PUD
Aoolication and Recommends the BOCC approve the Site Aoolication.
PROGRAMS i h sooperafron with local municioalifres. Arc comon*
hensive land use mao will define an tlrban Arca of lnfluence Jor eglch
iurisdiction. The definition will be based on topootaohv. qlrcvrlh oatbm.
frbnsooilation chancteristics and inoutfrcm the afiorld iurisdiction.
Response:
The County prepared a map that complies with the policy and it refers to the
map as the Prcposed Land llse Disticts. Studv Arcas 2 & 3. Garfield @untv.
Cotondo. (Attached as Exhibit 6), The map establishes a Three-Mile Area
Plan around each municipality with an additionalTwo-Mile Sphere of lnfluence
boundary denoted around each municipality
The Rapids property is located within the two-mile sphere of influence of the
Town of New Castle and is classified on this map as Subdivision Within Two
Mile Soherc of lnfluene (Town of New Castlel
The Applications are in compliance with the Urban Area of lnfluence Land
Distric't Map, Goals, Policies, Plans and Obiec-tives.
RPUD.I O4.D.S€c I Zoning.Subdivirion.doc 12
PLEASE REFERENCE RESPONSE IN PARAGRAPH 6 ABOVE.
Compliance Comprehensive Plan
The Application Zone District Amendment is in Compliance with the Comprehensive
Plan 2000 - Garfield County, Study Areas 2 &3 as noted below.
tn compliance with Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map - Subdivision -Two
Mile Spherg of lnfluence.
ln compliance with the Gomprehensive Plan - Town of Nevrr Castle.
ln compliance with New Castle Town Plan - Memorandum of Agreement -
Town of New Castle. The MOU acknowledges the PUD plan is in general
compliane with the Town's Comprehensive Plan.
ln comoliance with Zonino Resulations of Garfield County
tn compliance with Subdivision Resulations of Garfield County.
The Existino Use of Rapids Subdivision and the adjacent prooerties is Single
Family Residential. The use is compatible.
The Proposed Use of Rapids PUD and the adiacent orooerties is Single
Family Residential. The use is compatible.
Consistent with previous determinations for use as subdivision by BOCC.
Comptiance with Urban Area of lnfluence Goals, Obiectives, Policies and
Programs.
Compliance with Other provisions of the Comprehensive Plan
Bears Reasonable Relationship to GeneralWelfare of the Communitv
Summaru. The Application for a Zone District Amendment is in comoliance with the
Land Use District Maps and the Comprehensive Plans of Garfield Countv and the
Town of New Castle. The proposed use of the property for single-family lots and
open space is consistent with its present use, i,b commercial neiqhbors across the
riveI, Mountrain Shadows subdivision. Aoole Tree Park and that of its neiohbors.
ET
o
EI
o
o
o
o
o
o
RPUD.I 04.D.S€c I Zoning.Subdivision.doc 13
General Welfare. The proposed Planned Unit Development zoning would
permit lots to be clustered in the existing Rapids on the Colorado suMivision. The
cluster design would result in a large amount of open spaoe and trails along the river
for public use. The cluster design provides numerous benefits to the oeneral welfare
of the communitv.
PUD Benefits to the General Welfare of the Communitv
o lncrease Open Space. The PUD design will increase the Gommon
Open Space from 18olo in the existing subdivision to 65.606 in the
proposed Planned Unit Development.
. Public Access To Colorado River. The PUD design provides the
Golorado Rivgr frontaoe.
. &@s, The proposed PUD provides diverse housing types at a time
when a shortaqe of housino is expec'ted in Garfield County due to an
increase in energy develoPment.
. udtsI-slg3!!&, Approval of the PUD application would improve water
qualitv by eliminating 33 septic systems and providing central
wastewater treatment in their place.
o Town of New Cas0e il.O.U .Provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding with the Town of New Castle, provides the following
community benefits:
t Limits densitv to one single-family unit / one acre in conformance
with the Town of Neur Castle Gomprehensive Plan.
/ Habitat Provides protedion to wildlife habitat on the open space
tract located south of C.R. 335 and west of C.R. 312 (Merence
Exhibit "31.
r' Public Parkins and Tr:ails. Provides a parking area and aress
conidors for pubtic use of trails along the colorado River.
RPUD.I04.D.Soc I Zoning.Subdivbion.doc
Desionated Growth Area. The proposed PUD is in compliance with
the Comprehensive Plan 2000 objective to encouraqe qrowth near
existino urban areas.
Traffic lmpact Shrdv. Kimley-Horn and Associates, !nc. prepared a
Traffic lmpact Study that considers the trips generated by the
proposed Rapids projec-t and determined "The addition of Proiecttraffic
to the New Castle lnterchange (lnterchange 105) of lnterctate 70 is
anticipated to be less than 20o/o. Therefore a GDOT Access Permit is
not anticioated to be required for this oroiect."
Town of New Gasfle. The PUD conforms to the Town of New Castle's
Comprehensive Plan.
Existins Subdivision. The property is an existing platted single-family
subdivision with most of the infrastructure in plae. Density increase
would reduce development sprawl by increasing density and
development near existing mnicipalities.
Gluster Development The cluster development design of the
proposed PUD, incorporates many of the soals and obiec'tives of the
Comprehensive Plan 2000 regarding housing, transportation,
recreation, open spa@, trails, agriculture, water servi@, sewer
servi@, natural environment and development within the New Castle
Urban Area of tnfluence.
Public Welfare. Public safety, health and welfare of County residents
has been addressed in the following professional studies:
r' Lincoln-Devorc - Geologic, Sub-Surface Soils and Radioac'tive
Analysis,
/ Wrioht Water Enqineerc Water Study for Support of Augmentation
Plan Apptication: Rapids on the Colorado Water Supply Analysis.
The study states that the existino water svstem is adequate for 2(N
units.
r' District Court - Water Division 5 - Approved a Decree in Case
W-g262 Plan of Augmentation for up to 97OO residential unlb,
RPUD.I O4.D.Ssc I Zoning.Subdivbion.doc 15
inctuding the Rapids on the Golorado property. Reference Wright
Water Engineers above.
Hepworttr-Pawlak - Soils and foundation report for Waste Water
Treatment Facility Site Application; Performed tests to show soils
and reported no groundwater (in wet year).
Enartech. lnc. - Flood Plain Analysis, Site Grading Plan and
Certification that Building Envelopes for specific lots located near
the river are not in 100-year Flood Plain.
Mountain Cross Enoineerins - Prepared Drainage Study and
Drainage Design for proposed Planned Unit Development-
ilountain Crose Enoineerinq - Prepared Trafftc Study of PUD
and existing traffic on C.R. 335. Report indicates C.R. 335 would
be at 7.1o/o erreacfu to the west of the PUD and 35o/o of capacity
east of Apple Tree.
tountain Cross EnEineerino - Designed additional subdivision
roads and prepared road profiles for submittal with the Prcliminary
Plan. Designed water lines and sanitary sewer line locations.
Richard Holsan Survevino - Set Property boundary comeftr for
the platted subdivision and prepared topography maps afier dirt
plaement and compaction authorized by BOCC Resolution 97-26-
Enartech. lnc. - Designed existing water system and supervised
construction
Kimlev-Horn and Associates. lnc. The Traffic lmpac't Study
preparcd by Kimley-Hom recommends traffic signing and striping
within the project and determines traffic impacts on area roadways.
BOCC and Plannino Commission Approval. The Garfield
County Board Of County Gommissioners ("BOCC) and the
Garfield County Planning Commission have previously deternined
that subdivision of the subiect propefi for use as single-family
home sites is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the
proposed use is in the best interests of the health, safety, morals,
RPUD.! 04.D.S€c I Zoniqg.Subdivbion.doc 10
convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of
Garfield County".
Summarv Reasonable Relationship to Welfare of the Gommunitv The
cluster design utilized in the Application - Zone District Amendment and Preliminary
Plan Application provides numerous benefits that contribute to the generalwelfare of
the communtty. The benefits of special importance, include: 1) lncreasing open
spa6 in the subdivision from 18o/o to 65.70/o0/o. 2) Providing housing during a period
when housing shortages exist; 3) lmproving water quality by eliminating septic
systems; 4) Protecting wildlife habitat; 5) Providing public parking and acoess to
2,800 feet of Colorado River frontage; 6) Providing public aooess to trails near the
river, as well as many other benefits noted above that directly benefil the public and
prorride a reasonable relationship to the welfare of the communitv.
Comoliance With Colorado Revised Statutes - Zonine Review Strndardsl As
previously noted, the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review
for rezoning land in the County. The standard used for reviewing arcz.oningrequest that is in
compliance wi& the Comprehensive Ptan is the proposed rezoning need only bear a
reasonable relationship to the general welfare ofthe community.
Reouest For Apnroval. The Application Zone Distict Amendment-PLJD has shown
its compliance with the Comprehensive Plan 2000 - Garfield Countv. the SuMivision
Regulations of Garfield Countv. the Zonine Regulations of Garfield Cormty. the
Comprehensive Plan - Town of New Casfle and that the application bpars a reasonable
relationship 1o the general welfare of the communitv. Consequently. it is respectfrrlly
requested that the Planning Staff. the Plannine Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners aDrprove the Zone District Amendment Application - PUD.
RPUD.I 04.D.S6c I Zoniry.Subdivblon.doc 17 s/30/2006
The Ra ids
On the Colorado
Zone District Amendment Application - PUD
RPUD.I(X.E.Hdr.doc - 18 -
r {:l.
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970. 945. 821 2 Facsim ile: 97 0.384.347 0
www. oa rfield-cou ntv. com
Zone District / Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
GENERAL INFORMATION
: r" Trao
F Address: 2102 West Arapahoe Drive
D City: Littleton, State: Colorado Zip Code: 80120-3008
D Telephone: 303-798-1640 FAX: 303-798-1750
> Olmers of 24.219-Acre Tract & 4 Lots To Be Acquired Bv Rapids Development CorDoration
o Gene R. Hilton and Marv J. Hiltono Address: 2102 West Arapahoe Driveo City: ti@t@, State: Colorado Zip Code: 80120-3008
o Telephone: 303-798-1640 FA)(:303-798-1750
) Name of Owne/s Representative. if anv (Planner. Attorney. etc):
) Attorney: Leavenworth and Karo. PC.
D Attn: Lea Leavenworth
P Address: 201 14 th Street. Suite 200, E-QIArye[.2GlQ
> City: Glenwood Sorinos, State: Cotorado Zip Code: 81602
F Telephone:970-945-2261 FA)C970€45-7336 E-Mail:le!@lklawfirm.com
F General Location of Property: One Mile West of New Castle Town Limit on C.R. 335
D Legal Description: 121.488-Acre Parcel (Reference Exhibit "10' ).
> Property's Current Zone District Designation: A/! and A/R/RD (Reference Exhibit "7" )
P Property's Current Comprehensive Plan Designation: Subdivision Within 2-Mile Sohere of lnfluence of
Town of New Castle (Reference Exhibit "6").
D Prooertv's "Studv Area" Desionation: Studv Area ll - Subdivision Within 2-Mile Sohere of lnfluence )
D Doc. No.:
) Planner:
STAFF USE ONLY
Date Submitted: TC Date:
Hearing Date:
RPUD. l04.F.Zoning Form Appl.doc l9 IORD0iJ6
t.IREME
As a minimum, specifically respond to allthe following items below and attach any additional information to
be submitted with this application:
1. The Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review for rezoning
land in the county. The standard used to review a rezonino request depends on whether
the proposed rezoninq is in comoliance with the ComPrehen?ive Plan., lf ?=o. th9
a reasonable relationshio to the qeneril wj{fare of
ttre communiW. lf the rezoning would be in conflict with the Gomplehensive Plan, the
Appticant generalty needs to show either 1) that an eror was made in establishing the
cunent zoning, or 2) that there has been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood
tftat supports the requested zone change.
Depending on the subiect property's Gomprehensive Plan designation as mentioned
above, you will need to appropriately address one of the following standards in a
narrative form being as descriptive and specific as possible:
A. The orcoosd rvonino lor the subi*t orooqtu is in comoliance wlth {t9
Commullprltsive Plan. As such. the orcopspd rczoninq bgplrc a tasonable
rdetiondfio to the qqqal welfarc olthe ammunitv.
APPLICANT'S RESPONSE
L COMPLANCE -COMPREHENSIYE PI./IN 2OM GARFIELD CO. STUDYAXE,A A
The proposed rezoning of the Rapids on the Colorado zuMivision from
A/I and A/R/RD to Planned Unit Development is in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan 2000, Garfield County.
Comprchensive Plrn Land Use Desisnation. The Comprehensive
Plan 2000 - Land Use District lvlap designates the Rapids property for use as
"subdivisionVithinTwo Mile Sphere of Influence of the Townof New Castle".
A segment of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Map "Prooosed Land
Use Districts. Stu4v Areas 2 & 3. Garfield Countv. Colorado" is attached as
Exhibit"C'.
The proposed zoning as a Planned Unit Development containins l2l sinele-family
lots is in compliance with:
o The Comprehensive Plan 2000 - Land Use Disftict Map (Exhibit'C')
o The Comprehensive Plan- Town ofNew Castle (Exhibit "3')
o Memorandum of Understanding - Town ofNew Castle (Exhibit *3')
o Existing use of the property as single-family subdivisions @xhibit "4')
o Existing use of adjacent properties as single-frmily residential (Exhibits. 8-9)
o Compliance withthe purpose of Section 4.02 of the ZafugRegulations
o Compliance with previous determinations by the BOCC and Planning that
subdivision of the property as single-farnily residential is in compliance with
the Comprehensive Plan.
o Compliance with Garfield County Zrtfug Regulations that would permit
overall density no geaterttmn two dwellinq units per gross acre.
RPUD. I g.F.Zoning Fom Appl.tloc
Existins Subdivision. The Rapids on the Colorado subdivision is an
existing platted subdivision with paved roads, an existing water system with a
150,000 gallon storage tank, fire hydrants, underground electricity, telephone
and natural gas utilities that serve approximately 80% of the proposed lots.
Zonine Resulations. The PUD Application for a Zone District
Amendment for the property is in compliance with the purpose of Section 4.02
of the Zorrrig Regulations that states: "The purpose of a PUD is to permit
greater design flexibility and, consequently, mone creative and imaginative
design for development than generally possible under conventional zoning and
suMivision regulations". The density is in compliance with section 4.07.06 of
the Zoning Regulations that states "The overall residential density shall be no
preater than two (.4 dwelline units per pross acre within the PUD: --"
Town of New Castle - Comorehensive Plrn. The proposed Planned
Unit Development is responsive to the community goals and objectives of The
Town of New Casfle ('Town') as provided in the attached Memorandum of
Understanding ('MOLI') between the Towq Rapids Development Corporation
and The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association. The
Memorandum of Understanding confirms that the proposed cluster
development of l2l units is in general conformance with the Comprehensive
Plan of the Town ofNew Casfle.
The M.O.U. specifies a density of l2l single-family units, provides for
a wastewater treafinent facility on the site, provides for public access points
and tails to the Colorado River, and addresses the sensitivity of the open
space tract south of C.R. 335.
The Memorandum of Understanding also recommends that the BOCC
re*omme,nd approval of a Site Aoplication for a Waste Water Treahent
Facility and, zubject to certain conditions in the MOU, "The Tonm supports
the PUD based on ir zubstantiat compliance with its Comprehensive
Plan......"
Summarv. The Application for a Zone Distict Amendment is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plaos of Garfield Cormtv and the Town
of New Castle. The proposed use of the property for single-farnily lots and
open space is consistent with its present use and that of its neighbors.
ll. ruEASONABLE ruEIATIONSHIP TO aENERAL VELFARE OF COMMUNITY
General Welfane. The proposed Planned Unit Development zoning
would peflnit lots to be clustered in the existing Rapids on the Colorado
subdivision. The cluster design would result in a large amormt of open space
and trails along the river for public use. The cluster design provides ntrmer)us
RPUD. I 04.Fzoniq Fom Appl.doc
benefits to the seneral welfare of the communitv some of which are listed
below:
Benelits to the General Welfare of the Communitv
o The PUD design will increase the Common Open Space from 18% in the
existing subdivision to 65.60/o in the proposed Planned Unit Development.
o The PUD design provides the public with valuable recreational access to
approximately 3.500 feet of river frontage.
o The proposed PUD provides diverse housing types at a time when a shortagle
of housing exists in Garfield County due to an increase in energy
development.
o Approval of the PUD application would improve water quality by eliminating
33 septic systems and utilizing a cenhal wastewater teatnent facility.
r Provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Town of New
Castle, insures the following additional public benefits:{ Limits densitv to one single-famity unit / one acre in confonnance with
the Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan as opposed to two units per
gnoss acre in County regulationsr' Provides protection to witdlife habitat on the open space tract located
south of C.R. 335 and west of C.R. 312 (Reference Exhibit o'3"), and
{ Provides a parking area and access corridors for public use of trails along
the Colorado River.
o The proposed PUD complies with Comprehensive Plan 2000 to encouftue
growth near existine urban areas.
o fhre to the low traffic volune on C.R 335, traffic increases associated with
the PUD would not impact the level of service (currently "B" east and *A"
west) on C.R. 335. Based on 2002 Road and Bridge traffic counts, the
existing naffic ptus the projected Rapids the combined traffic volume would
be34.8o/oof road capacity east of Apple Tree andT.lo/o of road capacity west
of the PUD.
o The PUD conforms to the Town ofNew Castle's Comprehensive Plan.
o The property is an existing ptatted single-fanrily suMivision with most of the
infrastnrcture in place. Dersity increase would reduce development sprawl
by better utilizing an existing subdivision to accommodate growttr.
o The cluster development design, used in the proposed PUD, incorporates
ilrany of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan 2000 regarding
housing, transportation, recreation, open space, tnails, agficulture, wat€tr
sernice, sewer service, natural environment and urban areas of influence.
o Public safetv. health and welfare of Coun8 residents has been addressed in
the following professional studies:r' Lincoln-Devore (Exhibit 19 - Geologic, Sub.surface Soils and Radio-
active Analysis, Tests showed no groundwater.
{ Wright Water Engineers - Prepared a Water Study for Support of
Augmentation Plan Application: Rapids on the Colorado Water Supply
Analysis. The analysis states the existing water system is adequate for
204 units.
RPUD.'I 04.F.Zoning Fom Appl.doc
{ District Court - Water Division V- Approved a Decree in Case W-3262
Plan of Augmentation to provide water for up to 9700 residential trnits,
specifically including the Rapids on the Colorado property.
{ Hepworth-Pawlak - Soils and foundation report for Waste Water
Treatrnent Facility Site Application; Performed tests to evaluate soils and
reported no groundwater (in wet year)./ Enartech. Inc. - Flood Plain Analysis, Site Grading Plan and Certification
that Building Envelopes for specific lots located near the river are nqllin
100-year Flood Plain. Mountain Cross Engineering - Designed proposed
PUD. Prepared Drainage Study and Drainage Design for proposed
Planned Unit Development.{ Mountain Cross Eneineering - Prepared Traffic Study of PUD and its
effect on C.R. 335. Based on Road and Bridge 2002 traffic counts, the
analysis indicates C.R. 335 would b atT.lyo capacity to the west of the
PLJD and 34.8% of capacity east of Apple Tree.r' Mountain Cross Engineerins -Designed additional suMivision roads and
prepared road profiles for submittal with the Preliminary Plan. Prepared
water lines and sanitary sewer line plan./ Richard Holsan Surveyin& - Set Property boundary comers for the
platted subdivision and prepared topography maps after soil placement
and compaction as authoridby BOCC Resolution 97-26.r' Enartectr- tnc. - Designed existing water system and zupervised its
constnrction
Summanv Reasonable Rehtionshio to Welfare of the Communitv.
The cluster '!od" design utilized in the Application - Tarre District
Amendment and Preliminary Plan Application provides numerous benefits, as
noted above, that contribute to the general welfare of the community. The
benefits of special importanoe, include: l) Increasing opeNr space in the
subdivision from 18% ta 65.60/o. 2) Provides housing during a period when
housing shortages exist. 3) Improves water quallty by eliminating septic
systems; 4) Protects wildlife habitat; 5) Provides public parking and access to
3,500 feet of Colorado River frontage; as well as rnany other benefits noted
above that directly provide a reasonable relationship to the welfare of the
community.
lll. BOCC and Planninp Commission Aoorovals
The Garfield County Board Of Cotrnty Commissioners ('BOCC') and
the Garfield County Planning Commission have previously determined that
subdivision of the subject property for use as single-family homesites is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and o'the proposed use is in the best
interests of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and
welfare ofthe citizens of Garfield County''.
Pleose refer a re5joonsgs h Sectiotts I. II. III and IY.of thqe Aoolication*
RPUD.10'l.FZoning Fom Appl.doc
ff the rezonino would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
=the .4Dplicant
senerallv needs to show either 1l that an error was made in stablist i?g AE cufrent
iiiiq. oiT firit there has been a chanoe in the conditions ol the neiohborhood that
supoorts the reou*ted zone chanoe.
APPLICANT'S RESPONSE
The applicant's request to rezone the properly as a Planned Unit
Development is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plans of Garfield
County and the Town of New Castle for the r€asons noted above.
Since the property was platted ten yearc ago, the western part of
Garfield County has experienced a major economic boom due to growth of the
energy industry, the drilling of natural gas wells, pipeline constnrction and
support services companies and associated retail businesses..
The economic growth associated with the energy industry is a
significant community change that wilt require additional housing in the area
The location of the existing suMivision and infrastructure combined with the
goals, objectives, policies and programs stated in the Comprehensive Plan
2000 support the rezoning of an existing subdivision to a Plaoned Unit
DevelopmenL
Please nefer to other nesponses in this Application and in the attached Subdivision
Application - Preliminary Plan
lf the prcposd zoning of the suQj*t propefi conflicts. wltt the cunent d*lgnation as
ffined on frre Comprchensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Disticrs- tap, an Applicail
may wlstt to anend the Comprchensive Plan &signation so that the proposed rczoning
does not conf,ic,t with the Comprehensive Plan ilap. lf an Applicail requests to amqtd
this lilap, hey will need to orovidrc. a thorouql, nafiatiye tmt shows how t eir oroomed
Comorehensive Plan desiqnation is bef/rer suifcd than the exigino #iqnatiq,n 4va&twsina lhe ooals. obidives. wlicies. and oroorams listd for ttat &siqnation in
tte Comordtqpive Plan. This itfiwmation can be obbined fiom the Building and
Planning Dqarfrnent upon reques(-
Resoonse:
The property is identified on the Garfield County map "Proposed l,and Use Districts. Study
Ar s 2 and 3. Garfield County" as "subdivision Within tlrc Two-Mile Area of Inlluerce o!
Nary Costle". Based on the recognition by the Comprehensive Plan that the property is
"subdivision Within tlu Two-Mile Area of In/luerce of New Castle". and that a PUD is
znnng for a subdivision" the proposed Planned Unit Development zoning is in compliance
with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed PUD is also in compliance
withthe Comprehensive Plan-Town ofNew Casfle @eference Exhibit 3).
RPUD. 1 O4.F.Zoning Fom Appl.thc 24
3. Submit a zoninq map showinq the current zoninq of the subiect prooertv and adiacent
prooerties.
Response;
n nnp strowing the cunent zoning of the property and adiacent property is attached as
Exhibit'7". The cunent zoning of the property is A/l and A/R/RD.
4. Submit a vicinitv mao showinq relative location of th.e ProDertv at a scale of l" = 20ql'.
and extendinq at least % mile from all proDertv boundaries.
Response;
n tficlnlty tvtap is attached as Exhibit o8", ? second vicinity map is incorporated into the
Preliminary Plan Map attached as Exhibit "2'.
S. Submit a coov of the appropriate oortion of a Gafield Goq.ntv Aplegiods taD,sh=olrlnf
ndwnerc adiacent to the oropertv lwhich
should be delinqatedl.
Response;
n map prepared from the Garfietd County Assessol's Map is attached as Exhibit "9".
O. Sulmit a tist of all orooertv owners and their addresses adi?cqllto o,!!ri0t=t=!t ?00 ft of
m tne nsses?ois OfEge' We will dso E?ed
erat font owners of the sEligqt prcoertv. ffhat
inforrmation can be found in vour fftle policv under Exceptions to Title).
Response;
A list of the property owners within 200 feet of the property and their addresses is attached
as Exhibit "9'.
n lirt otthe mineral ownerc and their addresses is aftached as Exhibit "9".
One-half of 10006 of the Mineral Rights of the Open Space Tract located South of C.R.335
and East of C.R.312 is leased to Bill Banett Corporation, 1099 18n Street, Suite 2300,
Denver, CO 80202.
7. Submit a coov of the deed and a leoal descriotion of the ?ubiect propertv.
Resoonse;
fne OeeOs by which Rapids Development Corporation and Rapids on the Colorado
Homeowners Association acquired orvnership of the "Rapids propertyP and associated
easements, water rights, Bills of Sale, etc are attached as Exhibit "11'.
A Quit Claim deed, recorded in Book 1033 at Page 319, in wtrich Gene R. Hilton and Mary
J. Hitton merged title to 64.683 acres of land is attactred as Exhibit 12. Rapids
Elevelopment eorporation witt acquire a parcel of the land located west of C.R. 312 and
south of C.R. 335, containlng24.219 acres, at the time of Fina! Plat for dedication as open
space. (Reference Exhabit "12".')
RPUD.l04.F.Zoning Fom Appl.doc ?S l(m/06
9.
lf vou are actinq as an agent for the proDertv owner. vou must attach an
acknowledoement from the propertv owner that vou mav act in his/her behalf.
Response:
The President and Secretary of Rapids Development Corporation are acting for the
corporation. The President of the Rapids on the Colorado Homeownerc Association is
acting on behalf of the HOA. Gene R. Hilton and Mary J. Hilton have agreed to sell or
exchange a 24.219-acre tract to Rapids Development Corporation at the time of Final Plat
of the proposed Rapids on the Colorado Planned Unit Development. All parties signing the
Application are acting on their own behalf.
Submit payment of the $450.00 Base Fee: Applicant shall sion the cAsreement for
Pavmenft form and provide the fee with the application.
A check, number 5010, dated March 16, 2(X)6, payable to the Treasurer of Garfteld County
has been delivered to the Building and Planning Department.
once the aoplication has been deemed technicallv complete.
Two copies of this application along with supporting Exhibits are hereby provided to the
Building and Planning Department.
II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
(A Zone District Map Amendment is considered a two step process because it is firct revierred by
the Planning Commission which makes a re@mmendation to the Board of County Commissions.
The following steps outline hour the Zone District Map Amendment application review process
works in Garfield County.)
1. Submit this compteted application form (pages 14), base fee, and atl submittal requirements to
the Garfield County Planning Department. lt will be received and given to a Std Planner who
will review the application for technical completeness.
2. Once the application is deemed technically complete, the Staff Planner will send you a letter
indicating the application is complete. ln addition, the letter will indicate the dates and times
scfieduled for your request to be heard before the Planning Commission during a public
meeting (no notice required) and the Board of County Commissioners during a public hearing
(notice required). The Planning Commission will forward a re@mmendation to the Board of
County Commissionerc to be considered during a properly noticed public hearing. Statr will
send you the appropriate 'Pubtic Notice Form(s)' inOlcating the time ind date of your public
hearing and will provide you with a Stafi Memorandum regarding your requested Zone Distict
Amendment. (lf Statr determines your application to be deficient, a lefter will be sent to you
indicating that additional information is needed to deem your application complete.)
3. Please note, I an application indudes a request to amend the cunent designation as defined
on the Comprehensive Planrs Proposed Land Use Distrids Map, the request may be
considercd at the same meeting before the Planning Commission. Hourever, the request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be considered prior to the request to amend the zoning
10.
RR O.1O4.F.Zoning Fom Apfl.rbc
4.
map. ln addition, the Applicant shall be required to provide proper notice (as described below)
for the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the Planning Commission to hold a
public hearing on the request. Further, the Planning Commission is the final decision maker on
the Comprehensive Plan amendment request whereas the Planning Commission will make a
recommendation on the rezoning request to the Board of County Commissioners.
It is solely the Applicant's responsibility to ensure proper noticing occurs regarding the public
hearing before the Planning Commission and / or the Board of County Commissioners. lf
proper notice has not o@urred, the public hearino will not occur. Notice requirements are as
follows:
a. Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subiec't lot,
a desoiption of the proposed amendment and nature of the hearing, and the date, time
and ptace for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in
that portion of the County in which the subiec{ property is located at least thirty (30) but
not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of such hearing, and proof of publication
shall be presented at hearing by the applicant.
b. Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (1) above, shall be
mailed to all owners of record as shown in the Gounty Assessol's ffice of lots within
two hundred feet (200') of the subjed lot and to all ovners of mineral interest in the
subjec{ property at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such
hearing time by certified retum receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the
headng by the applicant.
c. The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible ftom a
public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The
posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days pior to the
hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and
ensure that it remains posted until and during the date of the hearing.
The Applicant is required to appear before the Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commiisioners at the time and date of the public meeting / hearing at wtrich time they will
consider the request. !n addition, the Applicant shall provide proof at the hearing beforc the
Board of County Commissioners (and Planning Commission for an Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan) that proper notice was provided.
Once the Ptanning Commission and/ or the Board of County Commissioners make a decision
regarding the request(s), Staff will provide the Applicant with a signed rcsolution memorializing
the action taken by either Board. Folloring the Boards' approval, this office will change the
property's zoning designation on the zoning map and the Comprehensive Plan Map (if so
decided) if approved.
above and have attached wtrich is
best gT my
on the
5.
theread
r and
Develoom
oxe ) 0t
Last Revised: 07 l25l2OO5
RPUD. I O4.F.Zoning Form Appl.doc
Date 10,
27 1(13106
SECTION II
Compliance With Section 4.00 - Zonine Resulations
PLEASE REFERTO RESPONSES IN SECTION Itr ANd IV
APLICATIONS
tte Zo* Oistict Amendment Application requests the existing 97269-ase Rapids on the Colorado
subdivision and an adjacent 24.2l9-aqe hact be rezoned from M and A/R/RD to Planned Unit
Development (PUD). In addition, a Subdivision Application - Pneliminary Plan is submitted rcquesting
approval to subdivide the property into 104 single-family lots, one wast€rf,ater tneam€nt site and 79.747
acres for open space and utilities. The proposed PLJD density would be one unit per acne.
PREVIOUS DETERIT{INATIONS OF COMPLIANCE WTilI COMPREIMNSIVE PLAN.
The Garfield County Board Of County Commissionen ('BOCC) and the Garfield County Planning
Commission previously determined that subdivision of the subject property for use as single-frmily
home sites is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and "the proposed use is in the best interests
of the health, safety, morals, conveniencg order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield
Count5/."
Colorado Revised Statutes - Zoninq Review Standtrds
The Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review for tezoning land in dre
County. The standard used for reviewing 6 p26ning request Orat is in complimce with the
Comprehensive Plan is the proposed rezoning need only bear a reasonable relationship to the general
welfare of the community.
Garfield Countv Zonins and SuHivision Resulations
Garfietd County has adopted Trln,W Regulations and Subdivision Regulations that guide suMivision
and zoning actions within the County. In addition, the County has adopted a Comprehensive Plan 2000
that provides a general state,ment of direction for land use planning in unincorporated Garfield ComU-
Comnrehensive Phn-Urban Area of Influence
The Comprehensive Plan 2000 establishes Goals, Objectives, Policies and Pnograms regArding land use
witrin three miles of municipalities. In compliance with a Compehensive Program 10.1, the Coun$
prepared a map Proposed Iand Use Disticts, Study Areas 2 & 3, Garfield County, Colorado, (Afiached
as Exhibit 6). The Rapids property is classified on the Comprehensive Plan LIap as Subdivision Within
Two-Mile Sphere of lnfluence CIom ofNew Castle).
RPUD.104.G.Sec ll Zone Reg Conpliane.doc 1O'lrrl000
The Comprehensive Plan 2000 also incorporates several municipal maps including the "Three-Mile
Area PlarU Town of New Castle, Garfield County Colorado" map. The "Three Mile Area Plan"
specifies land uses and densities that the Town of New Castle visualizes for the area.
The Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan map applies a classification of "Cluster-Low Density-
Residential to the Rapids property. The classification, in other Torm of New Castle regulations,
rccommends a density of one unit per acre.
TOWN OF NEW CASTLE SITPPORTS PI,JD APPLICATION
The proposed Planned Unit Developme,nl is responsive to the community goals and objectives of The
Town of New Castle ("Town") as provided in the aaached Memorotdam of Understanding (*ldOlJ")
betrreen the TowU Rapids flevelopment Corporation and The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners
Association. The Memorandum of Understandine confirms that the proDosed clust€r development of
l2l units is in general conformance with ttre Comorehensive Plan of the Town of New Castle.
The M.O.U. specifies a density of l2l single-family units, provides for a wastewat€r trreament facillty
on the site, provides for public aqcess points and trails to the Colorado River, and addresses the
sensitivity ofthe open space tract south of C.R 335.
The Memorandum of Understanding also recommends that the BOCC recomme,nd approval of a Site
Application for a Wastewater Treafinent Facility and, subject to certain conditions in the MOU, *Ihg
Torvn suotnrts the PUD based on its substantial compliance with its Comprehensive Plan....."
Comnliance With Zonine Resulations Section 4.00 PIJI)
4.01 Definitions.
Oefinitions of terms used in this Apptication for a Zone District Amendment ane provided in Section
4.01 ofthe Zon@Regulations of GarfieldCounty.
ZONE DISTRICT AMENI'MENT
The attached Zone District Amendment Application requests the existing 97.269-ase Rryidt on lhe
Colorado subdivision and an adjacent 24.219-aere tract be remned from A/I and A/RIRD to Planncd
Unit Development ('PUD'). Garfield County requires compliance with Section 4 - Plmned Unit
Development of Garfield County Zoning Resolution, 19E4, as amended.
RPUD.104.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Cornpliance.doc 29 1U4film6
The following respo6es to Section 4.00 requirements demonstrate the applicanfs compliance with the
Zsnirl.g Regulations.
4.02 Purpose and Obiectives of Planned Unit Development
Response
ilGp-ti"-t" are requesting a Znne Distict Amendment to rezone an existing platted subdivisioU
presently subdivided into thirty-ftree (33) two.acre lots, to PUD. The PLJD zoning will permit a
redesigrr of the subdivision that will incorporate changes trat will provide sipificant benefits to the
general welfare of the commrmitY.
The cluster desrgn utilized in the Application - Zone District Amendment and Preliminary Plaut
Application provides numenorls benefits that contribute to the general welfare of the commrmity. The
benefits of special importance, include: l) Increasing open space in the subdivision from l8% to 65-60/o.
2) providing housing during a period when housing shortages are predicte4 3) tmproving water quality
by eliminating septic systems; 4) Protecting wildlife habitat; 5) Providing public parking and access to
3500 feet of Colorado River frontage; as well as many ofter benefits noted above that directty provide a
reasonable relationship to the welfare ofthe community.
The flexibility of the PUD regulations allows a subdivision desrp that clusters the home sites, increases
the amormt of quality open space, provides higher densities of development within identified urban
areas of influence and provides a variety ofhousing typ€s. As a result, the PUD zoning project desrs
and development would promote the general welfare of the community as provided below:
PIJD Benefits to the General YVelfere of the Communitv
r The PLJD design will increase the Common Open Space from 18% in the existing subdivision
b 65.60/o in the proposed Planned Unit Development.
. The PLJD desip provides the public with valuable recreational access to approximately 3,5fi)
feet of river frontage.
. The proposed PUD provides diverse housing tnes at a tirne whe,n a shortage of housing exists
in Garfield CounU, due to an increase in enerry development.
r Approval of the PLJD application would improve water quallty by eliminding 33 septic
syst€,ms and utilizing a central rvast€water treafirent faciltty.
. The Memorandum of Understanding with the Town of New Castle, provides the following
additional public benefits:
O Limits densrty to one single-family unit / one-acr€ in conformance with the Town of
New Castle ComPrehensive Plan
El provides protection to wildlife habitat on the op€n space tract located south of C.R
335 and west of C.R 312 @eference Exhibit o3'), and
RPUD.104.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Corndiance.doc 30 t0r.g:1006
o Provides a parking area and access corridors for public use of trails along the
Colorado River.
r The proposed PUD complies with Comprehensive Plan 2000 "To promote development in and
around existing communities".
. Needed housing could be provided without affecting the level of service on a Cormty Road.
Due to the low traffic volume on C.R 335, faffic increases associated with the PUD would
not impact the level of service (cunently Level A west and l,evel B east of Apple Tree) on
C.R 335. Based on 2002 Road and Bridge traffic counas, e existing traffic plus the projectod
Rapids traffic would b 32o/o of road capacrty east of Apple Tree Community arf,7o/o of road
capacity west ofthe PUD.
. The PLJD is within the Two-mile sphere of influence of the Town of New Castle and generally
conforms to the Town ofNew Castle's Comprehensive Plan.
. The property is an existing platted single-family subdivision with most of the infrastnrcare in
place. Density increase would rpduce development sp,rawl by betrer stilizing m existing
subdivision to accommodate growth.
r The cluster development desip used in the proposed PuD incorporates goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan 2000 regarding housing transportAion, recreation, open space, trails,
agriculture, water service, sEwetr service, natural environment and urban areas ofinflue, rce.
. Public safety, health and welfare of County residents has been addressed in the following
professional studies:
o Lincoln-I)evore (Exhibit 19 - Geologic, SubSurface Soils and Radio-aclive
Analysis, Tests showed no groundwater.
o lYriqht Water Eneineerc -Prepared Water Study for Support of Augmentation Plan
Application: Prepared Rapids on the Colorado Water Supply funlysis. The analysis
confirms that the existing water syst€m is adequate for 2M rmits.
o District Court - Water Division 5- The Corrt approved a DecrEe in Case W-3262
Plan of Augmentation for up to 9700 residential units, including the Rapids on the
Colorado prop€rty. .
tr Henworth-Pawlak - Soils and foundation rcport for Waste Water Treahent Facility
Site Application; Perforrred soils tests for Site Application and reported no
groundwater (in wet year).
o Bnartech. Inc. - Ftood Plain Analysis, Sit€ Grading Plan and Csrtificafion that
Building Envelopes for specific river frontage lor in the existing suMivision are not
in the 100-year Plood Plain.
tr Mountain Crms Ensineerinq - Pr,epared Drainage Study and Drainage Desip for
the proposed Planned Unit DevelopmenL
RPUD.104.G.S€c Il Zone Reg Conpliance.doc 3l tly'lfiXlo0
Mountain Cross Ensineerins - Prepared Traffic Study of PUD and existing traffic
on C.R 335. Report indicates C.R. 335 would be atT.lyo capaclty to the west of the
PUD and 34.8yoof capacity east of Apple Tree.
Mountain Cross Ensineerins -Desiped additional subdivision roads and prepared
road profiles for submittal with the Preliminary Plan. Prepared water lines and
sanitary sewer line plan.
Richard Holsan Sunevinq - Set Property boundary oonrcn for the platte<t
subdivision and prepared maps after dirt placement and compaction
anthorized by BOCC Resolution 97-26.
tr Enartech. Inc. - Designed existing water system and superrrised constnrction
o Boatd of Countv Gommissioner Garfield County. The Board has
previously acknourledged that the subdivision of the property br use as
single-f-amily residential sites is in general conformance with the
recommendations set brth in the Comprehensive Plan br the unincorporabd
area of Garfield County (Exhibit 4 - Resolution 96-70 and subsequent
resolutions.).
Stmmtru. 'PUD Has Reasonable Relationshio to Welfare of the Communitv'.
The cluster desigg utilized in the Application - Zone District Amendment and SuMivision Application
- Preliminary Plan, provides numerous benefits that contribute to the ge,neral welfare ofthe cornmrmity.
Some important benefits noted above are: l) Increases open space in the suMivision from l*/o to
65.6yo. 2) Provides housing during a period when housing shortages exist. 3) lmproves water quality
by eliminating 33 septic systems; 4) Protects wildlife habitat by adding an open space buffer; 5)
Provides public parking and access to 3,500 feet of Colorado River frontage; 6) Provides public ascess
to trails near the river, and other benefits that directly establish a reasonable relaionship to the welfrre
ofthe community.
4.04 Scooe
Aoolications for Planned Unit Develooment 2oninq mav be made br anv zonino distict.
Raoonse
The property requested to be zoned Planned Unit Development is locar€d within the Agriculhral /
Industrial and Agricultural / Residential / Rural Density (A/R/RD) zoning districts.
/T.04 CONSISTENCY WTH THE TASTER OR COTPREHEITISIVE PI.AN
Rqoonse
RPUD.iO4.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Cornpliance.doc t2 101412006
Consistencv lYith the Comorehensive Plan
The Zone District A.;ffi r"qu"rt"d to be approved to permit the applicants to utilize the
flexibility of the planned Unit Development C'PUD-) desrgn process to cluster develop an existing
single-family subdivision and increase the amount of quality open space from l87o in the existing
subdivision to 65.6% in the proposed PUD.
trn accordance with a goal of the Comprehensive Plan" the PUD would provide growth within the New
Castle Two-Mile Sphere of Influence. The property is classified on the Comprehensive Plan map
entitled ProDosed Land tlse Districts' studv Are6 2 & 3' Gotield cout'tv' co' as "-Mg
SuMivision Wiftin Two-Mile Sphq€ of Influenc€ of Torm of New Castle.D The Town of New
Castle,s Comprehensive Plan spocifies the property should be used for sinsle-frmily cluster at a d€nsity
ofone unit per acre.
The Garfield Counry Comprehensive Plan 2000 Policy l0.l provides "Compreheraive Planning od
Znning R*olutiotts raisions, Tnne District Amendnents, and individual proiects within Urban Areas of
Irdluencq will be consbtent with local municipal land use policies'"
poliry l0.l essentially defers county regfrlations to the municipal regrrlations wtren a property is lttithin
an Urban Area of Influence. Accordingly, the applicants have entered into a Memorandum of
Agreement with the Town of New Castle @xhibit *3') to meet fris requirement of the Comprehensive
Plan 2000.
The Torm of New Castle has recommended the Rapids on the Colorado Pt D be approved because the
plan generally conforms to the Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan's land use and development
densities.
Ihe Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Goal for areas within an Urtran Areas of Influence is to:
*Ensure that development and overall land use policies occuning in &e CourtY that will affect a
The applicants have demonstrated that the application for aZnne District Amendment is consistent with
6e Garfield County Comprehensive Plan- 2000 - Snrdy Area 2 In Sections I, IL III and IV of the
pplications.
The Application for a 7-one District Amendment - Planned Unit Development containing 104 single-
frmily lob is consistent with the following:
mrmicinaliw."
RPUD.1O4.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Gonpliance.doc 3:l r0rar:t006
The Comprehensive Plan 2000 - Land Use District Map (Exhibit "6")
The Comprehensive Plan - Town of New Castle @xhibit *3")
Memorandum of Understanding- Town of New Castle (Exhibit "3")
Existing use of the property as single-family subdivisions (Exhibit'4")
Existing use of adjacent properties as single-ftmily sites @xhibit 8 & 9)
Compliance with the purpose of Section 4.02 of the bnhgRegulations
Compliance with previous determinations by the BOCC and Planning that subdivision of the
property as single-family ruidential is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Compliance with Garfield County PLJD Zoning Regulations p€nnit overall d€nsity no gr€at€r
than two dwelling rmits per gross acre as compared to the one resid€'ntial uit per acre
requested in the Zone District Amendment Application.
RELATIONSIIIP TO ZOIIING ATID SUBDTVISIOI{
The Rapids on the Colorado zubdivision is an existing platted single-family residential suMivision with
paved roads, an existing water syste, with a 150,000 gallon storage tanlq fire hydrants, udergrormd
electicity, telephone ani natural gas utilities that serve approximately 8(P/o of the proposed lots. The
proposed PUD would continue to utilize the infrastructure and would continue to be single-family
detached units.
Zonins Resulations. The Application for a Zane Distict Amendment - Pt D for the property is in
compliance with the purpose of Section 4.02 of the 7lllrfig Regulafions that states: *The purpose of a
PUD is to permit greater designflaibilily and, consequentty, more creative and imaginative daiSrrfo,
darclopment than generally possible wrder corwentional zoning and subdivision regalatiotr{- The
density is in compliance with section 4.07.M of the Tnnmg Regrrlations ftat sAtes "The wetall
residential density shall be no greder than two (2) dwelling units per gross acre within the PUD; -"
4.05 RELATIONSHIP TO ZONING AND SUBDMSION
The applicant is not requesting any significa6 modifications to the rcquine,me,nts contained within the
conventional subdivision regulations for infrastnrcture or dimensional standards
4.06 INTERNAL COTPATIBILITY OF PLANNED UilIT DEI'ELOPUENTS
Desrgr objectives were establistred for the proposed PLrD to insure the goals of the Garficld CounU
comprehensive plan were addressed in detail and that the uniqueness and environmental qualities of fre
property were protected.
Sensitivity to intemal compatibility of the design and to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan 2000 on
issues of, housing hansportation, rrcreation and open space, agriculhrre, water and sewer serYices,
I
a
!
r
I
I
I
RPUD.iO4.G.S€c ll Zom Reg Complianoe.doc l0r'frir006
natural environment and influence of urban areas helped define decisions that resulted in the desigrr of
the proposed planned unit development. Specific considerations were:
Internal Desien Elements and Compatibilitv
1xedggiglofttleproposed Rapids on the Colorado PUD considered elements related to the adjoining
environmental feahres, its neighbors and to the internal desip features of the subdivision. The Rapids
on the Colorado infrastructure, including roads and utilities, is essentially constructed and in place. The
design, therefore, concentrated on enhancing open space utilization for trails and as habitat for open
space adjoining the Colorado River and riparian areas. Special attention was given to the technical
operating considerations of the infrastructre and to the interaction of the suMivision with its
neighbors. Open space buffers were desiped to provide a separation with neighbon. Wat€r
rcclamation facilities are located over two times the distance from existing and proposed residences as
required by WQCD policies.
Open Soace Increase
[ory Phn have been reduced in size from a minimum of two-acres in fre
existing 33-lott plat to an average of 12,000 square feet average for single-family lots in the cluster
desip. The reduction in lot size increases the "open space" available for public use. The Preliminary
Plan desip provides a variety ofhome sites
. @!_b-$lqpg. Running lanes on C.R 335 were constucted for school buses and other
vehicles as a requirement of approval of the existing 33-lot suMivision. The require,ment
insured that school buses could safely load and unload shrdents within the zuMivision and then
safely reenter traffic on C.R 335. The school bus'!ull-outs' are provided in central locations
within the subdivision. All lots are located within rcasonable walking distance of potential
school bus stops, as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan.
. lfiFYear Ftood Plain. The planning and desip criteria for the Preliminary Plan required that
all building envelopes and frcilities be outside the l0Gyear flood plain. The flood plain data
used for desiping the PLJD is based upon Flood Plain Map C-lt pnepared for Grfield and
Mesa Counties. The Preliminary Plan desip incorporates topographic surv€,ys of the poperty
made after the Cormty aoproved the Floodplain Soecial Use Permit and fill material was
moved from the higher portions of the prooerty and placed onto,the river frontage lots.
After material was used to fill areas within the flood plain, a Profcsional Engineer, lic€nsed in
&e State of Colorado, provided an as.built certification that the elevation of specific building
envelopes were above the l0Gyear floodplain. The property was then resurveyed and
topographical maps ofthe property were updated to reflect tte changes
RPUD.1O4.G.Sec II Zone Reg Ccnfliance.doc 35 to4r:2008
Road Imorovements. Roads within the PUD are desiped and will be constmcted to
standards shown on the Preliminary Plan and in the Road Plan and Profiles attached as Exttibit
'25".
Public Water Svstem Extensions (CO 012366E). Extensions of the existing public water
syst€m are to be desiped by an engineer licensed in the State of Colorado; and constructed
and operated according to Stat€ standards.
Housinq. The'HOUSING GOALS', specified in the Comprehensive Plan of 2fiD -Garfield
County, were considered in depth in the planning and desip of &e proposed PLJD.
Pnotcct Bis Game Habitst The suMivision adjoins lands considered to be winrcr range for
big game. The dry steep hillside areas sou0r of C.R 335 have jrmiper and sage on the hillside
and Ganrbel oalq Utah serviceberry, elm, cottonwoo4 rabbitbrush and other planS suiable for
b,rowse gowing in the drainages. The PIJD desip will not disturb vegetation on &e hillside.
Protect Riparian llabitat Areas along the Colorado River and Garfield Creek are habitat for
beaver, ducls, geese and other small wildlife. The PLJD desrp and proposed covenants will
protect these areas by removing the riparian land ownership of twentv individual river frontage
lots and protect the frontage as oommon op€n space. The open space will be dedicaf€d to fte
Homeowners Association with the requirement that invasive plant species, such as Tamarac,
must be controlled" A trail system is proposed to parallel the riparian open space areas along
Garfield Creek and the Colorado River but will be set back away from the banks so the impact
on the riparian habitat and wildlife will be minimized.
Protect Netural Vesetation. The desigr of the PUD leaves the natural vegetation along the
steep hillside and in the riparian areas along Garfield Creek and the Colorado River
undistubed. Provisions in the Protective Cove,nants will require that the Homeoumers
Association must control invasive plant species and noxious weeds. In additiorn, the
Homeowners Association may reduce the risk of wildfire by removing dead tnees and other
fuel from the riparian areas.
Minimize Imoact on Agriculture. *Comply with the goal of the Comprehensive Plan *to
ensure that existing agricultural uses ame not adversely impacted by development-*.
Development should be sensitive to and respect adjacent agricultural uses through poper
buffering. The desip ofthe PUD provides an open space buffer along the 520-foot boundary
RPUD.1O4.G.Sec !l Zone Reg Compliance.doc 36 l0rar2m6
of the PllD and the adjoining AIR/RD Brannon subdivision exemption parcel (Reference
Preliminary Plan Map -Exhibit 2). The PUD and the adjacent property are also separdt€d by -
Garfield Creek, a geologic barrier.
Minimize Imoact On Two Adiacent Pronerties. The suMivision design provides large open
space buffers adjacent to two adjoining subdivision exernption properties. (JACE, LI,C '2.81
acres and Collins - 2.66 acres). .
Imorove Visual Imoact fin the Colorado River Corridor). The desip is sensitive to visual
impacts along fte Colorado River corridor. By using a cluster desip opcn spaoe has be€Nr
increased to 65.60/o ofthe gross area and all home sites have been reduced in size and located
firther from the river. Slopes and ridges are dedicated to the Homeowners Association and
will notbe developed-
Maintain Irrieation The Moore Ditch will continue to be utilized for irrigation. The
Preliminary Plan desip corsiders and provides for continued inigation of amenity and op€n
space areas that have been historically inigated with water from the Moore Ditch. Water
infiltration from inigation would continue to be available to protectwells in the rea
Maintain the Ssme Number of Access Points to County Road 335. The Preliminary Plan
desrp retained Paddlewheel kne and Whit€ Wat€r [,ane as the primary aoserls points to the
subdivision. The historic aocesri road (to Lot l) on the west end ofthe property is also lctained
for limited access to the Open Space tract and the proposed water rcclamation site.
I)evelooment Pattern. The proposed development respects the existing development pafiem
in the area and provides adequate separation by establishing large open spaoe tracts.
. 14g11!ZS, Provide a variety of lot sizes to maximize the availability of home sites for a wider
variety of income levels.
The desip of the Rapids on the Colorado PLJD has modmized open space wiein the suMivision,
clustered home sites along existing noads, provided an open space tract south of the suMivision,
provided a wastewater treatuent facility tocated over twice the distance from odsting and proposed
residences as required by State policy, incorporates a trail syst€m with river frontage access that
compliments adjacent home sites, provides a non-potable water system for inigation and augmentdion
frcilities including the Rapids Pond"
RPUD.104.G.Sec ll Zone Reg Complianoe-doc 3l l0r/fr2000
4.07 STA}IDARDSAIYDREOT]IREMENTS
4.07.01 The Countv Commissioners mav anorove a orooosed PIJD rezonins uDon a lindinq that it
will imolement the purnroses of this section and will mect the standards and reouirements set
forth in this section.
Rqoonse
it," ."ti* applicatioq including Preliminary Plan desigr, water rights strdies, geo-technical shrdies,
flood plain study, wastewater tre66nent study, surveys, mappin& tafEc studieq well permits, West
Divide water contract, drainage plaq Soils Conservation Service rePoft, as-built utilities informatiotl
water quality reports, water augmentation decree, deeds, title commiErcnt, exhibits and supplemental
exhibits, dermonstrate compliance with all applicable standards, goals, policies and objectives of the
Grfield County ZonngResolution of l9E4 as amende{ the Garfield Cormty SuMivision Regulations'
1978 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan - 2000 - Garfield County, Colorado.
4.07.02 The number of off-strect oarkins soaces for etch PIJL shall not be l:Gs:s than the
ffi in other zone districts. except that the Countv ComEls,sioners mav
number of off-street snaces in consideration of the followine
factors:
1. Estimated numfur of carc wtned by wupants of dwellings in tle PUD;
2. Pa*ing needs of nut4welling usr,s;
3. Varying time pedods of use whenever joint u* of mmmwt padcing ateas is gqposed.
Response
frE-conerants will require that all parking associated with all single-family dwelling units bG contained
within individual lots. Parking for two cars will be a minimum requirement for each resi&ntial lot.
The water reclamation site witl require periodic inspections and maintenance but will not be staffed on
a full time basis and will require one driveway for access at the frcility. Sirte€n (16) parking spaces.
will be provided at the west end of the 'tiver traif' for use by residents and the public. No other uses
are proposed which would require additional parking considerations.
4.07.03 The PIJD shall meet the followine site nlan criterie unlcss the eoplicent can demonstrrte
not eoolicable or that a orecticet solution has bcen otherwise
achieved:
Resoonse
fre Oesign of the project is based upon maintaining a rural efieciwithin the suMMsion, minimizino the
imoact uoon adioinino orooerties to the maximum extent possible. The proleci plovides 65.6% of oloes
area of the PUD as ooen soace with ooen soace / oark areas adiacent to almost all adioinino oroDertv
orvnefis. Ooen soaoe arcas also oroteci wildlife and maintain visual onidors akcng the Colorado River
Valley.
RPUD.104.G.SoC !l Zone Reg Conpliance.doc 10r4fi1000
Land uses on oarcels adiacent to the orooosed PUD include commercial businesses north of the
Colorado River, a single.family exemption trac{ on the east end of the PUD, a single'family exemption
traci on the west end of the PUD. South of C.R.335, the 34-acre open spaoe tract adioins public open
space and private lands used for agricultural purposes.
The pUD is designed with large open space buffers between the proposed "Cluster Singl+Family
Residential Districf and the adioining subdivision exemption parcels' '
The proposed 'cluster single-family residential" PUD is consistent with its present use and the adiaoent
single,family residential use of adiacent property ownera.
Rqponse
ffiffig residential street system was designed for the safety of the rsidents. The internal road
syst€m is looped- Proposed internal streets were redesigned based on Staff and Planning Commission
comments to provide internal clusters or pods by utilizing short culde-sac streets. The development
concept €,noourages 'block neighborhoods' and discourages traffic through the neighborhood- The
internal road network will be owned and maintained by the Homeorme/s Association Emergency
aocess will be allowed over all internal roads. The PLJD will have curb, grrtcr and sidewalks along the
intemal streets. Open space trails will be gfaveled. Trails next to the river will not be improved or
excavated- The Preliminary Ptan desip complies with the requirements of this section.
(31 The pUD shalt D|lovide lErldno atBas adeouab ln te]ms of loca6on. anta. citculation. tafett.
conwnience. sepaation and scrceninq.
Resoonse
A=ffi of two (2) off-stneet parking spaces is provided for each residential unit The water
reclamation site will require periodic inspections and maintenance but will not be statred on a full time
basis. Pa*ing will be allowed at the ftcility. Open Space parking (sixteen spaces) will be provided on
the west end of the property for use by residents and the public. No other us€s are proposed n'hich
would require additional parking considerations.
Resoonse
The pUD provides 65.6% ooen soace with trails, a park, tot lot, basketball court, fishing aooess and an
fnlring pond, alt of wtrich are planned for use by varyng age groups.
RPUD.104.G.S€c !l Zone Reg Cornpliance.doc 39 lO.frm06
Provisions in the Protective Covenants will restrict activities in the riparian areas but not limit activrty
totally. Fishing access is perrritted during dayliglt hours. Control of invasive plant and animal species
and removal of fuel for fue control purposes are considered necessary for safety and protection of the
public. Trails are located outside of the riparian areas to reduce impact on small wildlife species. The
Homeowner Association shall control use of the open space and associated parking including the right
to lock the parking lot and trails at sundown.
The open space tract located south of c.R 335 will be maintained ali an open space bufrer to
agricultural and open space lands as provided in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Town of
New Casfle (Exhibit "3').
Resoonse
lIp--niA"a in the SuMivision Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan 2(XX), the proposed Rapids on
tre Colorado PUD provides for single-family residential detached housing on varying size lots. In
addition, the desip ofthe single-family units will include a variation of sizes and price ranges.
Provisions for open space are noted in prior and subsequent sections sf this Zone District Amendment
Application and Subdivision Application - Preliminary Plan.
Gl The PUD shall orcvide adeouate orivacv betrneen dwellino unlta.
Resoonse
ffi n"* been designed so that adequate privacy is provided between single-family home sites.
Trails are located to provide reasonable separation from rear lot lines or residences.
Resoonse
The olat shall contain a Plat Note that will re$ire sidewalks in front of all lots at the time of certificate
of occupancy. Sidewalks in front of open sBace tracts fronting on Rapids View lane, Paddlewheel
I:ne and Whitewater [,ane will bc included within the Subdivision Improvements AgreemenL
The *River Trail" has five access points to the residential streets and sidewalks and will be constnrcted
approximately as shown on Exhibit (2) map. A trail around the Rapids Pond will dso b€ constnrcted.
Both trails will be approximately five feet wide and surfaced with five inches of graveUmaterial. One
of the access points provided to the River Trail is near a parking lot that will contain sixteeir parking
spaces for use by the public or residents of the subdivision. Provisions for closing the trail and the
pa*ing lot at sundoum by the Homeowners Association will be made in order to reduce noise and
protect the rpsidents evening houn.
RPUD.104.G.Soc ll Zona Reg Compliance.doc l0r'112006
The ,'River Trail" open space tract that fronts on the Colorado River is to be used for fishing access,
bicycling and hiking. The river frontage will be retained in its natural state. No commercial activities,
including rafting are to be conducted by the residents or the public on the open space tracts at any time
Response
rt]ffif-o*i"g water and wastewater systems are included within the Utility District for the proposed
Rapids on the Colorado PUD.
Weter Svstem - Potable
The proposed PLJD is served by an existing public water system. (Reference Exhibit l4)- The Rapids
on the Colorado water system derives its supply from two on-site wells drilled into the alluvium of the
Colorado River in locations shown on the PUD ll6liminary Plan map. The water system is oumed by
the HOA. The HOA will be responsible for fre operation and maintenance of the system and the sefting
of fees for water use. The HOA will be responsible for conEacting with a state licensed operation for
operation and maintenance of the system and the setting of fees for water use.
Water Svstem - Non-Potable
rrr=ffi water for eactr Iot and open space tracil shall be fiom a non-potable
pressurized water system utilizing high priority water from the Moore Ditch and Rapids Pond. The
distribution system shall be placed within utility easements, in the open spaoe arGas and in roads.
pumps and controls to pressurize the water will also be located within the utility dght-of-vuay or in the
open space tracts. The system will be wyned by the HOA. The HOA will be responsible for he
operation and maintenance of the system.
Wasteweter Treetment Facilitv (TYIYTF)
A wastewater reament@teo on the west end of the proposed PLJD. The site location
is shorm on the attached Preliminary Plan mao (Exhibit 21.
The Rapids Development Corporation will consfiuct the facility and collection lines and will charge Ap
fees and monttly service charges. After recovery of tte costs of constnrction and operation' Rapids
flevelopment Corporation will transfer the title and operation to the Homeowners Association and the
Homeowners Association will accept the transfer. The HOA will bG responsible for the operation and
maintenance ofthe system and the setting of fees for water use..
RPUD.10,[.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Cornpliance.doc 11 lu1i20im
A Utility Zone Distric! to include the WWTF and the Water System, is provided in the PUD
regulations.
Igl Arv dasturbance of slopes in exc6s of 40 percent shall be the minamum necessaw
6 and qeo-technical olan submitted
with the PUD aoolication.
ResoonseTfffiian does not contemplate any disturbance of slopes in excess of 40%'
Resoonseiiiffiilunity Facitities" to be provided within the subdivlsion include a baeketball couG tot
!ot, sports fietd, trails, sidewalks in fnont of open space tracts, additonal toadt, spinHer ayrbm
and lawn for the Rapids Pond open spaoe tract, potable water system, non'potable wabr sysbm
and the WWTF site and system. The improvemenb will be plovided by Raplds Development
Corporaton and transftrred to fite Rapids on ttre Colorado Homeownep Associaflon atthe fme
of thelr completion, subiectto other p\conditione in this application'
The HOA agpes to accept tiUe to the additional open space and utility trects, eroe9t the WWTF
tract at the ffme the PUD plat is ftled.
Afur Rapids Drevelopment Corporation is rcimburaed for 'rts construction and operating
expenses, the Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Associaton shall accept tde b and shall
operate and malntain the water syebm and the waste wabr coltecfron and tneatnent 9y8bm,
eetablish a fee strtrchrrc to cover elpenses, rcceiw payment for fees and pay operatonal
expens6. The Homeowners Association furtreragrce3 to acceptOde, operafional rceponclbllity
and tiability for the lraibr and sgilBr systems fronr Rapi& Ilevelopment Corpor:a6on- Repie
Dmlopment Corpo:ation agloes to transfertide to the eysbma to the Homeowners Associaton
by Oult Claim Deed and Bitl of Sale.
4.07.04 taximum Heioht of Buildinq
Resoonse
ilffi-mu-m Xeight of Buildings: Thirty-two (32) Feet
rL07 05 taximum LotAreas and tinimum Setback Reetrlctions
Resoonse
Fffiift-Freffminary Ptan map Lot setbacks are2Sfeet on cerbin lots and 50 fuet on certain lots as
spec*6ed on the Prcliminary Plan Map and to be specified on the Fana! Plat.
4.07.06 Resadentia! Densitv. The Garfield Countv Ptannod Unlt Reoulauons Drovld6 that:
RPUD.i04.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Cornpliance.doc 12 lU'U:1006
The overall residentiat densitv shall be no qrcater than two (2) dwellino units per oross
acre within the PUD: orovided. however. that the Countv Commissioners mav allotil an
increase to a maximum of fifteen (15) dwellino units oer qroas acre in ar€as wherG
oublic water and sewer svstems. owned and operated bv a municipal qovemment or
soecial district arc readilv available and the orior zonino classification allowed
reeidential densities orcater than two (21 dwellinq units per orcss acrc.........."
Response
The density within the proposed PUD is less than one unit per acre. Public water and a
wastewater treatment svstem will be construc'ted bv Rapids Develooment Corporation and
eventuallv ooerated bv the Homeowners Association as oreviouslv noted. Denstty
calculations are as follows:
Gross Acres:
Number of Dwelling Units Proposed:
Dwelling Units / Acres Density
Acres / Dwelling Units Density
121.488
104
0.866
-1i108
The proposed clusteled densities arc averaged and fansfened within the PUD as prwided in the
rcgulations and are justified by appropriate design features that actrieve high standards of design and
livability.
4.07.07 PUD Acrcaoe tinimum
Resoonse
The Rapids on the Colorado PUD is comprised of 121.488 acres.
4.07.08 Gonsistencv wlth the Comolehensive Plan
Resoonse
The applicant has demonstrated ompliane with the Comprehensive Plan in Sections M. Please
onsider information provided in Sections l, ll and ll. Of the Application 6r Zone District Amendment and
Subdivision Application - Preliminary Plan.
{.07.09 Ooen Soace Reouirement
Resoonse
The projed provides 79.747 acres of open spae that will be improved with Uails and recreational
iacilities fur the residents. The number of acres that qualifies to be counted as open space is 81.258
acres.
"Quallfred' Ooern Soace Rquircrnqrt 1.O7.(N
Tdal Arca trn PUD
25Yo ot any PUD shall be devoted to Open Space
Umitation of Use and Tvoe of Ooen Soace
Garfield Co. ACTUAL
Reouirement PUD DeshnAcras Acres
lizl-ffi_
_il322_
121-4fi
zgJtz.
RPUD.104.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Comdiance.doc flyar:1000
Limitation for Commercial (Fee for Use) Water - 4OYo ollhe2So/o
Limitation for Average Slope Over 25% Slope - 4Oo/o ol lhe 25o/o
Balance - Other Open Space Categories Listed Above
Total Open Space Requirement al 25Yo
4.07.10 Fractional OrYneshio
- 12.149
12.149
6.074
fr2IU_
0.000
0.mo
79.747
29142
Resoonse
ThJapplicant is not proposing to market any fractional ovnership within the PUD.
4.07.13 Thie gBcton aooliee to all Planned Unit DEvelooment Aoolicatiorrs. wttlch lnclude
r€sidlential development in Garfteld CountY ComDl€hemive Ptan StUdy Afea l.
Resoonse:
The tuoqsed PUD is in StuSlttMiL @
SECTION 4.08 PUD PROCESSING
4.08.01 Amendment to Comprehenslve Plan
Resoonse
ft1g appmnts are not proposing amendments to the Garfield Coufi Comprehensive Plan - 2fiD Study
Ar?a2.
l. Garfield County Compn;hensive Plan Section 10.0 Urban Area of Influence Section l0.l
PROGRAMS: "In coopuation with local manicipalities, the comprehensive latd use map will
define an Urban Area of Influence for each jurisdiction The deJinition will be based on
topograplry, growth patter4 transportation characteristics and input from the afeAed
jwisdiction"
Response:
The County prepared a map that complies with the policy and it refers to the map as the
Proposed Lad uie Disfficts' study Areas 2 & 3' Garfield cou't$'' colorado' (Afiached as
Exhibit 6),
The map establishes a Three-Mile Area Plan around each municipality wih an
additional Twoilite Sphqe of tnfluencedelineated around each municipality.
The Rapids property is located within the fr,rlo Uile Sonere of tnnue of the Tom of
Neur Castle and is classified on this map as SuMivision Within TwvMile Sohere of
lnfluene (Tutn of New Castlel
The Comprehensive Plan 2000 also incorpomtes several municipal maps including
the"Thrc*Mile Area Ptan. Town of New Casile. Garfteld @untv @ol,eldd map. The
RPUD.104.G.S€c l! Zone Reg Cornplisnce.doc lOr'U:m0O
'Three Mile Area Plan" specifies land uses and densities that the Town of New Castle
visualizes for the area.
The Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan map applies a classification of
"Cluster-Low Densitv-Residetntial" to the Rapids property. The classification, in other
Town of New Castle regulations, recommends a densi$ of one unit per acre-
The density of the proposed PUD is less than one unit per acre. The density is equal
b the one unit oer acre visualized in the Neur Castle Comprehensive Plan br
Subdivision Within Two Mile Sphere of lnfluence Torn of Nal Castle
The PIJD will not rcquire a Chanqe to the Comprchensive Plan-
Please Reference Resoonse In Paraeraoh 6 in Section I.\
Resoonse
ftre appi:cants are submitting a Subdivision Aoolication - Preliminarv Plan simultaneously wi$t the
Aoolication Zone Distdct Amendment - PUD and request the applications be proessed simultaneously.
t1.08.03 PUD Tvpe of Uses
fhe aoolicqtion ehall show s'herc wittrin the PUD each tvpe of use shall be located.
Resoonse
The Preliminary Plan Map, attacfred as Bfiibit 13, shors where each type of use wtthin the PUD will be
bcated and indicates the total acreage devoted to each use.
4.08.M PUD Prooosed Uses
Resoonse
Uses allored within the PUD are as follors:
Usee Bv Rioht Single-family drrellings and customary accessory uses induding home
occupations, fen@s, hedges, gardens, ualls and similar landscape features; driveways, siderualks, patio,
inigation system; landscaping, utilityand drainage easements along al! lot lines.
Conditonal Use: Day nursery for no more than four cfrildren, group home for not more than four eHerly
rcsidents over sixty-five years of age.
tlnimum LotArca:
RPUD.1O4.G.S€G ll Zone Reg Cornpliance.doc
7,5fi) sq.fi.
lO'U:1006
Maximum Lot Coverage:(Building Only)
tinimum Lot Line Setback
FRONT - From Front Lot Line (ln Feet)
REAR - From Rear Lot Line (ln Feet)
SIDE - From Side Lot Line (ln Feet)
taximum HeiqhtFeetl:
50%
LOTS r.33 LOTS 34A3
ANp 84{6 LOTS 87-10450 25
t0 t0
55
32 t2
Addifional Reouirements: All uses shall be subfect to the provisions Under Sectlon 5
(Supplementary Regulations) of the Garfleld County Zoning Regulations, ag amended.
Usee Bt Rioht
Open space, urater impoundment, parts and associated rccreational f-acilities; playgound
equipment; basketball oourt sports field; benches: lawns. landscaping; agriodtural crops, home
garden plots: naturat vegetation and wildlife; roads and fails; lnigation system induding
sprinklers, valves, pipelines, controls, measuring devices, vacuum breakers, poiler and all
sprinkler system components as requircd from time to time; fences; diversion facililies from the
Colorado River and Garfield Creek; easements for underground utilities, underground pipelines,
non-potable water system and water augmentation system pipelines, manholes. valves,
ontrols, dMders, pumps, measuring devices, existing Public Service (Xcel) ard Holy Cross
transmission lines;; unrecorded access roads as they exist at the time of plat .Moore
Ditch and pipetine; Hudson€ullivan Ditch and Pipeline; underground utitities
(including telephone, gas, water, non-potable vvater, cable, electricity, scni,er lines, and
manholes); utility access roads; drainage ditches, pipelines, c{lverts, drain boxes and
culverts/bridges; equipment storage for equipment used to maintain the PUD open
spa@, trails, roads, and utilities; electrical inigation ditch generation equipment and
controls and uses reserved by prior o\ryners.
Conditional Use: Use of Open Space tmcb for additional purposes not
provided in "Uses By Righf, shall be approved by 51oh of owners of lots wihin the
Planned Unit DevelopmenL The Conditional Use shall be in accordance with GarfieH
County regulations, as they may exist at the time the Conditional Use is requested.
Soecial Uee: lrlone
ilinimum Lot Arca: 257o of anv PUD shall be devoted to Ooen Soace - 30.372 Ases.
ilinimum Setback Zero (0)
taximum Heioht:25 Feet
Additional Reouiroments: All uses shall be subiect to the provisions under Sedion
(Supplementary Regulations) of the Garfield Gounty Zoning Regulations, as amerded.
RPUD.104.G.Soc ll Zone Reg Cornplianoe.doc {6 luu'im[t
UTILITY DISTRICT
Uses Bv Riqht:
1) Wasterrrrater Treatment Facilitv including office and test laboratory: equipment storage for open
space and facility maintenance equipment and supplies,
2l Water Wells and Pump Sites -. Each Site Ten feet in length by ten feet in width.
3) Water Well and Potable Water Treatment Site - 20 Ft. Width X 5O Feet Dept
4) Water Storage Tank and Well Site - Refierene Preliminary Plan
5) Non-Potable Water Pump House - 20 Ft. Width X 50 Feet Depth
6) PublicTrail, Parking Lot and WWTF Access Road
n Landscaping
8) Fences
9) Underground utitity lines and associated equipment induding transformers, pedestals; valves,
regulators and equipment specifted by the utility provider.
10) Non-Potable Water System pressure pumps and pump houses
11) Water augmentation system facilities.
Gonditional Use: Expansion of WWTF
Soeciat Use: None
tinimum LotArca: 1fi) Square Feet (Waterwell Site)
tinimum Setback WasterraterTreatment Facility Buildings 150 Feetftom Residence.
(State policy is 1fi) Feet from residence)
WaterWell Sites-Zero Lot Line Set Bad<
taximum Heioht: Twenty-Five (25) Feet
Additional Requircments: Alt uses shall be subiect to the ptwisions Under Section 5
lSupplementary Regulations) of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations, as amended.
4.08.05 PUD Submittal Requirements
Wtren a pretiminary plan Rootlcation is induded with a PUD aoolication the SubdMsion Resolution
rcouircments will suoersede the foltowino PUD reouirements where the same information or more
detailed information is required as a part of a subdivision application.
f ) Sbtementof otirners lnbrcBt
Resooase;
neference: (Eglnq) Aoolication - Zone District / Comorehensirre Plan Mao Amendment
2l A PUD Plan includino...a) Minimum number of drrelling units proposed within the overall area.
Resooase:
Reference Preliminary Plan Map - Elfiibit 2.
b) Thq minlmum acreaoe that will be dedicated to Ooen Space.
Resoonse.'
Referenoe Preliminary Plan Map
c) The tvpee of usec prcoeed and acrcaoe devoted to each.
RPUO.104.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Gompliance.doc t0rar:1006
Response.'
Reference Preliminary Plan Map
d) iiaiorintemalcirculationsvstem.
Response:
Refurence Preliminary Plan Map
e) The acreaoe that will be dedicated to school siEs
Resoonse.'
neference preliminary Plan Map - Scfrool Fees have previously been paid on 33 of the l(X
lots.
D The oeneral nafurc of commerciat and indusEial usee. if anv. to lr located ln 0re
PUD.
Resoonse;
ftre pUO ls a single family residential suMMsion wtth water and sewer systems thatwillcharge
tap fees and operating costs to be paid to the Deneloper or Homeorvners Association, as
prcviously noted.
S) Plovision for water. sewer. telephone. electtcltv. oas. and cable blevlelon. if
apolicable.
Resoonse.
Reference Section I of this Application and Exhibits 13 and 25 .
Otlrer rcrertrictions orcooacd bv the aoplicant written in the fom of a zolr distict telG
Resoonse.'
Reterence prctectlve Gorenants and oreceding resoonse to 4.08.O1 PUD Prooosed Uses
h) lf more tran one ohase is orooosed. a ohaclnq plan shatl be included in Ote
aoolication that delineabs the otoooeed ohasino.
Resoonse;
A phasing plan is not requested.
3) A rcoional location mao
Resoonse.'
Reference Preliminary Plan Map and Exhibit 8.
tfl Asite mao
Resoonse;
Reference Preliminary Plan Map - Exhibit 2.
5) Slte Topoqraohic mao
Resoonse.'
Referene Preliminary PIan Map - On+'Foot Contour lnterval Map
6) A Loqal lleecription
Response.'
ReGrence E:dtabit 10
nA@a. Obftrctvee to be achieved by the PUD
RPUD.1O4.G.S6c ll Zone Reg Complhnce.doc 48 t0rar:21t00
Resooase.'
Reference Sections l, ll and lll.
b. A development schedule
Resooase
Construction will be completed within 30 months.
c. Cooies of orotectve covenantg
Response;
Referenoe Exhibit 22
d. A list of owner of orooertv within two hundrcd feet of the PUD boundarieg.
Resoonse:
Reference Exhibit I
Sewaqe - Reference Supplementary Et'ribit A - Site Application for WWTF
Storm Drainaqe - - Reference Bfiibit 16 - Drainage Report
Potential Nafu ral Hazards
i.Avalanche - Reference Exhibit 17 - Linoln Devore Engineering Not Avalanche
area.
ii.Landslide - Reference Eldlibit 17 - Lincoln Devore Engineering Arca to be
developed is not a landslide area.
iii.-Flood-Plgl4-Area - Reference Exfiibit 20 - Enartecfi, lnc. and Mountain Cross
Engineering - Certifications regarding building envelops out of 100 year
Floodplain.
iv.Soile. - Reference Bfiibit 16, 17 and 18. Residential sites adequate soils.
Easements showino rrested leoal acce$ ftom a oublic rcad to the PUD.
Resooase.
Referenoe Bfiibit 4 - Existing Raoids on the Colorado Plat for 33 Lots. County road 335
adjoins the access roads to the proposed PUD.
h. Response.
Referenoe Sedion ll Pages 7-9 and also Sedion lll.
Reference ResJoonses b Sabdivlsion Aoollcstlon - Sedon III.
e.
t.
!t.
lr t.
tv.
RPUD.I&.G.S€c ll Zone Reg Comdiane.doc 40 lu*M
The Ra rds
On the Colorado
Subdivision Apptication - Preliminary
RPUD.104.H.lldr.doc
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
108 8'n Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970. 945. 8212 Facsim ile: 97 0.384.347 0
www. oa rfield-cou ntv. com
Subdivision Application Form
GENEML INFORMATTON
D Subdivision Name: The Rapids on the Colorado
D Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types):
Sketch Plan _ Preliminary Plan )O(XX Final Plat
) Owner (Applicant): Rapids Development Corporation
Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Gene R. Hilton and Mary J. Hilton -24.219 Ac., Lots 7, 8, I & 10
) Address: 2102 West Arapahoe Drive Telephone: 303-798-1640
> City: Littleton State: CO Zip Code: 80120-3008 FAX: 303-798-1750
D Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc):
D Address: 201 14 th Street. Suite 200. P. O. Drawer 2030 Telephone:970-945-226'
) City: Glenwood Sprinqs State: CO Zip Code: 81602 FAX: g70-g45-7336
F Name of Engineer: Mountain Cross Enqineerinq. Attn: Chris Hale
F Address: 825 % Grand Avenue, Telephone: 970-645-5544
D City: Glenwood Sprinqs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FA)(: 970-94S-SS58
D Name of Surveyor: Richard Holsan, PLS
) Address: 4773 Countv Road 314 Telephone:970-876-2947
D City: Silt State: CO Zip Code: 81652 FA)(: 970-876-2947
) Name of Planner: Mountain Cross Enoineerinq. Attn: Chris Hale
) Address: 825 % Grand Avenue. Telephone: 970645-5544
F city: Glenwood sorinos state: co Zip code: 81601 FAX: 970-945-ss58
RPLD.IO4.T. SubDiv Appl Form.doc 52
GENERAL INFORMATION continued...
) Location of Property: Section 4, 5 and 9 Township 6 South Range 91 West, 6th P.M.
Practical Location / Address of Propefi: One Mile West of New Castle on C.R. 335
D Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres): 121.488 Acres.
) Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision:
UlilitLDistrict. and Open Soace Tracts
) Propefi Current Land Use Designation:1. Property's Current Zone District Studv Area 2 - Subdivision -
2. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Existinq Subdivision - 2-Mile Sohere
of lnfluence - Town of New Castle - Cluster -Low Densitv Residential- One
Unit Per Acre.
Proposed Utility Service:) Proposed Water Source: Existi
F (See "Attachment C" to be completed with Preliminarv Plan Application)
) Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: Rapids \MTVTF (Application Recommended)
) Public Access VIA: C.R. 335. Paddle Wheel Ln. Rapids View Ln. White Water Ln.
F Easements: Utility: Qwest. Holv Cross Enerqv. Excel Enerov. Rapids HOA.
Ditch: Moore. Hudson and Sullivan. Read and Sullivan
) Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below):
) Base Fee: Sketch Plan - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200
) Plat Review Fee (see attached fee schedule)
RPLID.I04.T. SubDiv Appl Fornudoc 53
I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS
ln order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use
processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process,2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and
3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide
general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision
approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for
purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following
address: htto://www.garfield+ountv.com/buildino and planninq/index. htm
A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to
propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Deparfrnent and the Garfield
County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with
the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identiff any
issues that nould need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued.
2. Applicabilitv
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield Gounty is required to complete the
Sketch Plan review prooess as the first step in Garfield Countfs SuMivision prooess.
More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the
division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parels or
separate interests, or the use of any paroel of land for condominiums, apartnents or
other multipledwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
ln order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for revievning
Sec'tion 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the
Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the
resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments.
Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations oontain the
specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Departnent in order to
satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this
application form.
4. Process / Public Meetinq
The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1-step process because the
application is reviewed only by the Ptanning Gommission at a public meeting. ln order
to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all
requircd application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning
Eleparfrnent Staff. Once submitted, Stafi will have 15 working days to review the
application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as
required.
lf Statr determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed technically
oomplete." lt is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
RPLJD. 104.'I'. SubDiv Appl Form.doc 54
scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the
applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review.
lf Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the
applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the
Planning Deparfinent to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically
complete. tf the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,
the application will be terminated.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will
conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory
documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the
Comprehensive Plan of 2000. ln addition, Stiaff will also consider refenal omments
provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.
As a result, Staff willwrite a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning
Commission containing the resuJts on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will
also be fumished in advance to the applicant.
At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff
will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to
present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by
the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning
Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Prooess will
be kept on fite in the Planning Elepartment for l-year from the meeting date before the
Planning Commission. lf an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to
the Planning Deparfinent within the l-year timeftame, the Sketch Plan file will be
closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a
Preliminary Plan review.
B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review prooess is to onduc,t a thorough review of
the many aqpects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the
purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most
intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission,
and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough revieuv of all
the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory
requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the maior issues
in the proposed subdivision by using the Countt's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision
Regulations, Comprehensive Pian of 2000, as well as other state and local refenal
agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the
process that will either approve or deny the application request.
RPLJD.104.'I. SubDiv Appl Fonndoc 55
2. Applicabilitv
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield
County's Subdivision pro@ss. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision
as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or
separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or
other multipledwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
ln order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already
compbted the Sketch Plan review pro@ss addressed in Section 3:00 of the
Subdivision Regulations.
An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this
application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to
4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Desiqn and
lmprovement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations.
tn addition to the substiantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision
proiect itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notioe requirements so
that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Gommission and the BOCC
which is addressed in Sections 4:20 -4:31of the Subdivision Regulations.
4. Process / Public Hearinqs
The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2-step process because the
application is ultimably reviewed by two County decision+naking entities during public
hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC.
ln order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and
the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal
requirements mentioned above to the Planning Deparfrnent Staff. Once submitted,
St#will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if allthe required
submittal information has been submitted as required.
!f Statr determines that all the required information has been submitEd, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed technically
oomplete." lt is at this point Statr will also indicate when the application has been
scheduled to be reviewed beforc the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff
will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted.
lf Statr determines that all the required information has not been submitEd, a btter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply wtth the submiftal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be technically
incomplete." The letter wil! also otrtline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the
applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the neoessary information to the
FPLTD.I04.T . SubDiv Appl Fonndoc
Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically
complete. lf the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,
the application will be terminated.
Once the application has been deemed technically eomplete and a date has been
established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application,
Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use
regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and
the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. ln addition, Staffwill also consider refenal comments
provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.
As a result, Staff wil! write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning
Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This
Memorandum will also be fumished in advance to the applicant prior to the public
hearings.
As mentioned above, Staff makes a reoommendation to the Planning Gommission and
the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the anatysis of the proposed subdivision. The
Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Gommission who is
responsible for making a re@mmendation of approval, approval with conditions, or
denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOGC during a
regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the reoommendations ftom the
Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the
applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making enttty
regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or
deny the application.
lf the BOGC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval
shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval,
or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted
by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific
information provided in Sec'tion 4:4 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Folloring the
hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC s'hich memorializes the
action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk
and Reorde/s ffice. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are
required to complete the third and final step in the Gountfs Subdivision Process: Final
Plat Review.
C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Pumose
The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a
mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during
the Preliminary Plan review prooess have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of
the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will
sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approva! granted
by the BOCC. This is the last step in the Count/s subdivision process.
2. Applicabilitv
RPUD. 104.'I'. SubDiv Appl Form.doc 57
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision
process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot,
tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or
the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multipledwelling
units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
ln order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the
Preliminary Plan review prooess addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision
Regulations.
An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form,
alt the required submittal information contained in Section'5:00 of the Subdivision
Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the
Preliminary Plan review process.
4. Process
The Final Plat review pro@ss is considered a 1-step process because the application
is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC
for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittral information to the
satisfaction of the Building and Planning Departpent.
!f Staff determines that all the required infonnation has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." lt is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
scheduled to be presented to the BOCG for signature. (Ihis is not a public hearing or
meeting and therefore does not require public notice.)
lf Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the apptication does not comply with the submitta!
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be technically
incomplete.' The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the
application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information
satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of
approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for
review ahd a signature. ln the event there are additional questions or claffication
issues to be addressed, the County Surueyor will generally contact the applicant to
have the plat adjusted as ne@ssary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all
required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department
and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at
the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to
authorize the Ghairman of the BOCC to sign the plat.
RPLJD.I04.T. SubDiv Appl Form.doc 58
Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Glerk in the Clerk and
Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet
thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final
Plat represents the completion of the Garfield Gounty Subdivision Process.
Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the
Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of
the applicant to complete the Final Plat process.
Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a
gCneral guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield
County. lt is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase
the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations
or access them on-line at:
http://www.qarfield-cou ntv.com/bu i ld i nq and plan ninq/i ndex. htm
in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the
three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review,
and Final PIat Review.
I have read the above and have provided the required attached information
Last Revised : Ol t25l2OOS
RPUD. 104.'I'. SubDiv Appl Form.doc 59
SECTION III
Comoliance With Section 4.00 - Subdivision Resulations
PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
SU BDIW SION REGU LATI ON S
Section 4.00 Submittal Requirements
Response
ffre pretlmlnary Apptication Form, Maps, requircd additionaland supplemental information arc
contained in this application and in the'Volume 2 - Exhibits" and "Volume 3 - Atta,chmentsf
provided to the Building and Ptanning Departmentwith this Preliminary Plan Application.
Section 4.00 Submittal Requirements
Response
Tfte development constraints addressed in this section were previously
considered by the Planning Commission and the BOCC at the time the
97.269-acre Rapids on the Colorado subdivision was platted into thifi-three
(33) two-acre lots and three open spaoe tracts.
The Garfield County Board Of Gounty Commissioners ("BOCC) and the
Garfietd County Planning Commission previously determined that subdivision
of the subject property for use as single-family home sites is in compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use is in the best interests of
the health, safety, morals, convenien@, order, prosperity and ulelfare of the
citizens of Garfield Gounty."
Development constraints for the proposed PUD are addressed in this sec{ion.
Copies of studies, decrees, deeds, maps, permlts, title commitments,
regulations and related documents are included in the attached Volume 2 -
Exhibits".
Section 4.50. Preliminaru Plan tap
Resoonse
RPUD. 1 Ott.J.Sec lll.SubDiy Appl Compliance.doc
The Preliminary Plan Map "The Rapids on the Colomdo - Planned Unit
Developmenf is included as Exhibit - 2 tn Volume 2 - Exhibits attached
hereto and made a part of this Application.
S*tion 4.60. Addiional lnformation
The following information is required by the subdivision regulations of Garfield
Gounty, Cotorado:
a Terms of Reservations.
Proposed terms of rcservation or dedication of sites for public andlor
common facilities or use. if anv. qreenbelt:
Response
The open space and public roads will be dedicated to public use as provided
in other sections of the Zoning and Subdivision Applications. A limitation is
proposed on the use of trails by non-residents for the period between one hour
before sunrise and one hour after sunset. This limitation is in recognition that
the subdivision is primarily for residential use and the limitation may contribute
to an orderly neighborhood.
B. Phasins Plan Description.
D,escriotion of anv prooosed ohasinq plan. if anv.
Response
The applicants do not propose a phasing Plan.
Access.
ilidence that all tots and parcels creaEd will have access to a public
rioht-of-wav as required bv Colorado state law.
Resoonse
Alt lots will have ac@ss to County Road 335 over the following existino public
roads:
'1. Rapids Mew Lane,
2. Paddle Wheel Lane and
3. White Water Lane
4. All new roads will be dedicated to public use.
o. Parkinq Places.
RPUD.I 04.J.S€c lll.SubDtv Appl Compliance.doc
Total number of offstreet parkinq places:
Response
ffi- Street Parkinq
Single-Family 208
Public and lltlWTF {6
Soil and Topooraphical Hazards.
Evidence that all arcas of the subdivision that mav involve soil or
topooraphical conditions presentinq hazards or rcquirinq special
precautions. mav have been identified. and the prososerd use of these
ateas is compatible with such conditions.
Response
Please reference Section 4.70 responses, below, and associated Volume 2 -
Exhibits 16,17,18 and 19.
Radiation Hazard.
Radiation Hazard and land use information.
Response
Lincoln-D,evorc (Exhabit 19) prepared a study of the property entitled
"Enoineeino Geolwy a . The tests showed
no groundwater and a letter noted that the nearest known radiation hazards to
the propefi was at Rifle.
Title Gommitment of the orooertv to be developed.
A ti0e commitment for the propertv to be developed is reouired.
Response
A cunent title commitnent, prepared by Land Title Guarantee, is included as
Exhibit 13 in Volume 2 - Exhibitrs, attached hereto.
Survev.
lf therc is a subdivision of a eection reouircd. a coov of tre final
worksheet shall be provided fior aoproval bv the Gountv Survevor.
F.
RPUD.I04.J.S€c lll.SubDlv Appl Compliane.doc
Response
The survey of 'The Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision" was previously
reviewed by the County Surveyor at the time of Final Plat. This proposed PUD
contains an additional24.219 acres. The property survey will be provided to
the County Surveyor.
S*tion 1.70 Supolemtental lnformation: Geoloov and Soils.
lnformation on the followinq characteristics of the area prgoosed for
subdivision shall be shown oraphicallv and/or bv repoils whenever
aoDroDriate. for a complete description of existino conditions and shall
include:
Geolooic and Flood Plain
Description andlor illustration bv a reqistered profeseional enoineer
sufficient to indicate anv development problems.
Response Geolo_qic
Lincoln-Devore prepared an "Engineeino Geolaoy and pd
subsurface So/s Sfudy' (Exhibit No. 19) on the property. The engineering
report concludes, "ln general, the soils found across the subdivision willform a
reasonably good base for the proposed residential structures."
R*oonse Flood Ptain
A.s previously noted, the existing Rapids on the Colorado subdivision adjoins
the Colorado River and Garfield Creek and is platted into thirty-three
residential lots and three open spaoe tracts. At the time the Preliminary Ptan
for the subdivision was submitted for review in 1996, a request for a Floodplain
Special Use Permit was submitted to Garfield County BOCC requesting a
permit to allow future development within the floodplain, including the
placement of fill materialand construction of residential strucfures.
The Board of County Gommissioners approved the Ftoodplain Special Use
Permit and fill material was subsequently moved from the higher portions of
RPUD. I 04.J.S€c lll.SubDiv Appl Conrpliance.doc 6:]
the propefi and used to elevate the surface of building envetopes above the
1 0O-year floodplain level.
After construction was completed, a Professional Engineer licensed in the
State of Colorado, provided an as-built certification that the specified buitding
envelopes were above the 1O0-year floodptain. The property etevations were
then subsequently resurveyed and topographical maps revised to reflect
elevation changes.
The building envelopes in the proposed 104-lot Zone District Amendment -
PUD are designed farther away from the river than in the present 3$tot
subdivision. The land located nearest the river is proposed to be utilized as
@mmon open space with a "river trail," fishing ac@ss and parking available
for use by the public during daylight hourc.
The "Colomdo River and rributaies prepared for Garfield
and Mesa Counties, Golorado (Map c-18) in 19g2 was the basis of the
Grading Plan elevations used to define the flood plain elevations.
B. Soils.
Provide f,laD and description of soil tvpes and their boundariee based on
Response
The folloring soils information is included in Exhibits 17 and 18 o? llotume - 2 Exhibit{
Exhibit No. ? - "so!!-Hazad Mat rhe soit Hazad Map (Map No. g),
contained in the Garfield County comprehensive ptan, doei not show any
soi! hazard on the property. The GIS information for the site is provided in
this application as Exhibit No. 17.
Exhiblt 1tlo.17 - "u.s. Dept. of Aoriculturc shows the scs soil
types for the site. Soil descriptions and characteristics for each type of soil
are provided in Exhibit 17.
LJncoln=o,ev=oe prepared an 'Ensineerino Geoloov and prcliminaru
Suosurface Sor/s Sfudr/ (Exhibit No. 1g) on the
RPUD. 1 O4.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Compfiane.doc 1U1fr20,m,
report concludes, "ln general, the soils found across the subdivision will
form a reasonably good base for the proposed residential structures
o Exhibit No. 18 - "SIope Hazard illap" The "Slope Hazard Map" contained
in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan, does not show any slope
hazard on the property on which residential lots are proposed. However,
the common open space tract, used as a wildlife buffer, south of County
Road 335 is shown on the map as a slope hazard atea. Development is
not planned on the steep open space area indicated as a slope hazard.
The "Septic System Constraints'(Ep-I!gj) contained in the Garfield County
Comprehensive Plan does not apply to the proposed PUD since a central
Wastewater Treatment Facility is to be constructed.
Veoetation.
Vesetation description and a tap showino location of maior tlee masses
on the propertv.
Response
Vegetation information related to the proposed PUD is included in Exhibits 17.
The vegetation masses are located along the Colorado River, Garfield Creek
and the open space tract located south of C.R. 335. Vegetation located within
the building envelopes is grass, alfalfa and weeds.
D*crtofion of Veaebtion fines.
The vegetation types found on the site vary between the crop grasses and
clumps of allalla found on the platted lots and the native vegetation found in
the riparian area adjacent to Garfield Creek, the riparian area adjaent to the
Colorado River and the dry hillside and drainages south of C.R. 335.
Dominant native vegetation species on the project site include Nanow teaf
cottonwood, box elder, plains cottonwood, Russian otive, Gambel's oak,
chokecherry, Saskatoon seruiceberry, hawthorn, juniper, willow, Siberian elm,
pinyon, rubber rabbltbrush, woods rose, smooth broam grass and cheat grass.
The plants are found growing on the open space tracts and along the banks of
the Colorado River and Garfteld Creek.
RPUD.l04.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Complhnce.doc 65
The riparian area vegetation and small game habitat located adjacent to
Garfield Creek and adjacent to the Colorado River will not be impacted by the
proposed development. The areas are located within the floodway (in which
development is prohibited) and in the floodplain fringe areas (in which
development activities, if any, would be very limited. Fishermen and other
sportsmen have used the areas atong the river for many years. (Reference
Exhibit 2 - Public Access).
The 9.78-acre open space tract rocated south of county Road 33s was
previously deeded to the Homeowne/s Association and will remain as open
space' An additional 24.219-acre tract, presently owned by Gene R. Hilton
and Mary J- Hilton, will be acquired by Rapids Development Corporation for
inclusion as open space. The vegetation and wildlife habitat on the hillsides
and in the drainages will be preserved.
A plan requiring ontrol of noxious weeds and other invasive species, such as
tiamarack, will be included in the protective covenants. ln addition, a
requirement for the Homeowners Association to control fuet levels in the open
space areas will be included in the protective covenants or other appropriate
documents, in order to redue the risk of wildfire damage of propefi.
Wildlife
o+ in=ctEdilo biq saFethe mappino practc
Resoonse
Efiibit 2o of Volurne 2 - Exhibits includes two maps that show mule deer and
elk conentrations. The maps ("Map - Mure Deer wnter h and
"Mao - Elk Wnter Concentntion") were prepared from the Division of Wildtife
GIS information on the Garfield County vveb site.
The maps indicate that the nearest concentrations are tocated approximatety
one-half mile south of the property. Division of Wildlife GtS reports strate that
RPUD.lg.J.Sec il.SubDivAppt Comptiane.doc 66
migration routes for big game are to the east, to the west and to the south of
the property.
Deer and elk frequently come down to graze on the property. provisions for
dog control will be included in the Protective Covenants of the subdivision.
The proposed Rapids on the Colorado PUD design designates a 34.00-acre
tract, located south of c.R. 33s, as common open space. The open space
tract results from apprication of the ctuster deveropment design. The open
space protects the lnterstate 70 visuat corridor and provides a wildlife buffer
between deer and erk habitat south of county Road 33s and the proposed
PUD.
Natural vegetation types in the riparian open space areas and on the steep
hillsides will be protected. Dedicating the land to the Rapids Homeowners
Association, requiring the HOA to control invasive plant species and timiting
construction activities in the flood fringe areas wilt protect wildtife and the open
space riparian areas,
As noted above, big game migration routes for deer and elk go east, west and
south from the Colorado Department of Natural Resources land. There are no
migration routes of big game across the Rapids on the colorado property.
Because populations of deer and elk are near the property, the preliminary
Plan design contains the foltowing features that benefit wildlife:
1. Open spaoe conidors to the river
2. Open space buffer south of C. R. 33S - 34.00 acres
3. Fencing construction compatible with Dow standards for deer and etk,
south of C.R. 33S.
4- Dog controras noted in the deed recorded in Book s76 at page 133
5' Control of invasive plant species in riparian areas by the Homeowners
Association
RPUD.104.J.S€c llt.Suil)ivAppt Compliance.doc 6t
-
1U1t,?0[6,
S*tion 1.80 - Suoplementarv lnformation - Drainaqe plan
A drainaoe olan. at frte same scale as the Preliminaru Plan and oreoarer,
bv an enqinealr rcoistercd in the Sfarte of Colol,ardp.. shatt deoict the
followinq information in qraphic or wrtfien form:
6. Removal of fuel from open space areas to reduce potentia! wildfire
damage
7. Construction will be minimal in flood fringe areas in order to reduce
impact on small wildlife.
1. bristino water cources and lak*
2. Limib of tributaru areas. wherc oractical.
3. Conseauenc* of tribubru flows.
Desion of drainaqe facilities to prevent stotm wafalr in excess of historic
flows ftom enterlnq. damnino. or beino canid bv existinq dlarinaqre
faciliti* and to orcvent maior &maoe of floodinq of ,esidences in l(Nt-
var sbrm. showino:
7. Arca subi*tto inundation
2. Location and size of ptoposed culverh. di0;hes'. bri&es and
channels.
Response
"Rapids on the Colondo PU , prepared by
Mountain Gross Engineering, lnc. is included in votume 2 - Exhibits
(Exhibrt 16 and 25t attached hereto.
The report is based on the 1O4Jot design proposed in the PUD application
and responds to the issues identified above.
The Preliminary Plan application contains a map "Raoids on the Colorado
- Dninaqe Plan" (Exhibit2il. That identifies the facilities that exist, those
that are proposed, the florrvs predicted in a storm event and provides storm
drains and open space areas to accommodate drainage.
RPUD. l(X.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appt Compfiane.doc
section 4.97 - suoolementaru lnformation - lltilitv Plan - water
A w?ter supplv plan. at the same scale as the Preliminarv Plan. shatlprovide the followinq oraphic and or written form:
Resooase
Water Supplv Plan. A water supply plan is attached as Exhibit 25.
Also, please reference Section I of this Application for existino water
supplv svstem photooraphs.
Erioht Water Enoineerc has conducted a study. Rapids on the
Colondo Water Supolv Analvsis that addresses the issues noteO
above. Please Reference Exhibit 14.
A Memorundum of Water
Allotment Contract is attached as Exhibit 14 in Volume lt - Ethibits. ln
addition, Volume 3 - Attachments includes a copy of an Application to
Amend the West Divide Contract for additionalwater.
ln 1!l instancei. evidence that a water supolv. sufEcient in terms of
oEalitv. quantitv ?nd dependabilitv stratt be avi
adequate supplv of water for the oroposed subdivision. lnctude:
1. Evidence,of ownerchip of riqhB or riqht of acquisition existino orprooosed water riohts.
Response olrnerchio of Water Riqthts
The Applicant, Rapids on the Colorado Homeotrmers Association,
OuYns 19.65% of the Moore Ditch water rights included in the Plan of
Augmentation W-3262.
The proposed PUD will require tess than 0.953 CFS of the W-3262
Moore Ditch Priority No. 3 and 14 Water rights for continued inigation of
up to 42.02 acres of meadow land historically inigated from the Moore
Ditch. ln addition, approximately 0.024 CFS of Moore Ditch Priority
No. 3 and No. 14 Moore Ditch Water Rights will be deeded or has
previously been deeded to the Homeowners Association for
replacement of depletions from junior water priorities for Rapids Welts
No. 1 and 2 and for water storage in the Rapids Pond ("reservoif).
RPUD. rO4.J.Sec llt.SubDrv Appl Compliane.doc
The additional water w-3262 Moore Ditch Augmentation Plan water
Rights are owned by the Applicant, Gene R. Hitton-
The west Divide contract for one acre-foot of water annuatly is being
amended to 2.0 acre-feet, (Exhibit 14). The water will be utilized for
replacing non-irrigation season (winter) depletions. The contract has
been assigned to the Homeowners Association.
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS REPORT INCORPORATED:
RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO WATER SI'PPLY ANALYS'D
RPUD.104.J.S€c lll.SubDiv Appl Comptiane.doc
Engineers, lnc.
@
Wright Water
818 Colcrado^'€.
P.O. Bo(219
. Glen^,ood Spdngs. Cobrado 81602
le70l 945-7755 IEL
le70l94$9210 FA\
1303, 893-16@ DEr.rlGR DRECr IJ,\IE
Vh nrst Classltflolt
S€pt€mber4 2003
Revised April T,2006
Mr. GeneR Hihon
P.O. Box 1274
Littleron, cl) 80120
Rc: Rapids on the Cobrado WaterSupply Analysis
DearIUr. Hilton:
Wright Waner Enginccrs, Inc. (WWE) has estirnated the water supply roquirenrnB for the rpvised
Plamed Unit DeveloprrEnt (PuD) rczoning of the Bryids on the Colorado Developnrnt in Garfield
@unty, Oolorado. The dcrdoprrnt is cnrrently planned to have l2l resi&ntial units and 42 acres
of inigated lan4 ircluding opcn ryace and landscape anpnities associatod with ttp rcsidcntial units
Ttrc potablc in-house water supply for thc residential units will be providod from two orsite wells
tluough a central'distribution eyrfrcrn WWE urderstands that no inigation water will be prcvidcd
by tlre central potable watrii syst€m All inigation in thc PIJD will be by a separate rnrrpotable
syrtem thatdiverts watcr frromGarfield Cheek ttnough the historic Moorc Ditch.
thc lfihon Augrrrcrnation Plan" erced in Water Court Case No. W-3252" cstablistrcs thc critcris
br detorrnining tho wator domards basod on rosidontial unit& Rcsidsntial wastcu,ata will bo
colletcd and treated by rrans of a oentral wastcwater treatnDnt s,rstenL
Tabb I prcsents thc waf€r roquircnrcnts ard strcam deplaioru for tho PUD. The calculatlons ue
based on critcria defincd in Case No. 1V-3262; speificalllq
. Average oocuparcy of 3.5 pcrsoru per unit (]ean-round),
r Avorago dclivery of lfl) galbru per day pcr pcrson, ard
o Averqge sscam @letbn of dclivered in;housc water trcatcd ttrough a central wastcwater
tr€at[pnt sy*cm of 3 pcrcent Ihis assurEs a rrcrrlagoon wastcwatcr trcatrDnt systc[r
fuinual potabb divcrsbns at fuU build out will equal 47.4 ar,re-fpet (AF), and annual &pbtbns witl
b 1.42 AF. The existing nro nplls arc capble of punrping the full arDunt of water required for
domsb usc for ttrc prolrt" Thc maximum purnping ratc ftom the well system is cxpetcd o be
about lm gprrt which exoeeds maxinurm &mrnds.
Because of ttrir junior prbrities, thc depletioru resuhing ftom thc donr.stic use of watcr puued
ftom tlp wclls will ncod to bc rcptacod to tho Garfiold ChocldColorado Rivcr slstom during tho
oEr{r/ER l3O3' {s}r 700 a.rM rco l97olz5*71t1 8O-[DER-1303' {73-95@
av lAl'tt' { /*, '
Mr. Gene R. Hilton
Apnl7,20M
Page2
irrigation season We believc this rrced can be nrt ttnough the operation of the augnrntation plan
decr€ed in Case No. W-3262 by permanently drying up to t.O acre of inigated landlying underthe
Moore Ditch.
It is our unddrstanding that the anpunt of land that will be withdrawn from inigation as a result of
the oonstngbn of strceB and the dwelling units is expected to be greater than- fO acrEs, which is
signifcantly rprc than what is required to augrEnt the irrigation r"u.o, donpstic use depietions.
Thc dectee recognizes that tlprc is no senior demrnd for water firom thc Garfietd Cbeek dgring the
rcn-inigation season, sothere is no requirenrent to reptace the PUD's depletions during ttrat sisonto that systenl Neither is thcre cunently any non-irrigation season senior call frrom tfr" Coto.aAo
River that would call out the PUD's junior well rights. Nerrrtheless, should such a call materializp,
provision has been made ttmrgh a contract with ttre West Dividg Conservancy District to deliver
up to I AFof stored waierto the Colorado River.
It is our opinion that the proposed Rapids on the Colorado P[JD, as described in this letter, has an
adequate physical and legal water supply to rrpet its full build out water demands.
Please do not hesitarc to call if you have any questions.
Vcry tnrly )tours,
WRIGIIT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
William L Lorah, P.E.
Senior Consultant
Attachnpnt
cc: Jack Ross, Esq., Dufford & Brown" pC
cLrrroRtswwB03t.05:muilRorc wsA REV.ec
RPtD.l2lJ.Sscl[.&60iyApplGompfane.rfoc Tz
TABLE 1
Raplds on the Colorado - 121 PUD
ln-House Water Diversions and Depletions
(1) 121 EQR at 350 gpd pet EQR in AF per mmth
l2l 121 EOR at 350 gpd per EQH in gpm per month
(3) 3 peroent ol Column 1 in AF'(4) 3 peroent of Column 1 in gprn'
'Assumes a non-lagoon wastowater treatment system
Days f,lonth
Potable Water svstem Ilepletlons
AF
(1)
gpm
el
AF
(3)
gpm
(4)
31 Januanr 4-O29 29.410 0.121 0.882
28 Februarv 3.trIg 29.410 0.109 0.882
31 Marcfr 4.029 29.410 0.121 0.882
30 ADril 3.899 29.410 0.117 0.882
31 May 4.V29 29.414 0.121 0.882
30 June 3.899 29.410 0.117 0.882
31 v 4.029 29.414 0.121 0.882
31 Auoust 4.929 29.410 o.121 0.882
30 Seotember 3.899 29.410 0.117 0.8E2
31 Ociober 4.O29 29.410 0.121 0.882
30 November 3.899 29.410 0.117 0.882
31 D,ecomber 4.@9 29.410 0.121 0.882
365 fotal 47.48ia 1.424
Gegr Hltaon-r c:LwoRt(wwaGr{6irrfi(mr\T8bbt REv wri0t*wal€rEtEarEoG.kE.
PmdByHRK
CldBywll.
POI ln lrl -f -qm ltl -srttitrtiu Annt Carnafianca-dc 73
Historic Use and Estimated Yield of claimed water rioht
Response
The historic use and estimated yield of the Moore ditch, Priority 3 and
14 water rights owned by the applicants, has already been determined
in the District Court, in and for Water Division No. 5, in Case W'3262.
The Court found that Hilton had irrigated 70 acres from the Moore ditch
(Page 9), and the average yield per acre irrigated of 1.38 consumptive
use acre feet (Para. 19, Page 10).
The average yield for the 70 irrigated acres is 96.6 consumptive use
acre-feet. A copy of Decree W-3262 is included as Exhibit 14 in
Wilume 2 - Exhibits.
Availabilitv of existinq risht to chanse in use
Response
A Plan of Augmentation has been approved by the District Court that
decreed a change in use from agriculture to municipal, industrial,
agricultural and other uses. The decree also pennits water storage in
the reservoir (Rapids Pond") for replacement of out of seasoR
depletions. The water rights can be used for domestic or amenity
inigation purposes in the proposed PUD.
Evidence that oublic or orivate water ownerc c.an and will supplv
water to ttre proposeO subaiviiion.
A. The amount of water available for use within the subdivision bv
such providerc
Response
Domestic. The amount of physical water presently available for
domestic use in the subdivision is 105 gallons per minute or 151,200
gatlons per day. The average daily demand for domestic water within
the subdivision is 36,400 gallons per day. (121 Units X 3.5 percons per
unit X 100 gallons per Day). The two wells produce over three times
1)
2)
3)
RPUD.I 0'l.J.S6c lll.SubDiv Appl Complhnce.doc 74 t0r420(b
the amount needed for domestic use, based on 100 gallons per person
per day standard.
Open Space.
Open Space will continue to be inigated with Moore Ditch water rights.
B. Feaeibilitv of existino seruice to the area
Response
The Rapids subdivision is presently served by an existing public
water system owned by the Rapids on the Colorado Homeownerc
Association. As noted in paragraph 6.C., the HOA will provide
service to the proposed PUD.
C. Proof of the leoal dependabilitv of the proposed water supplv
Response
The water rights for Moore Ditch No. 3 and No. 14 are some of the
highest priority water rights in the Colorado River basin and have
never been called out by the main stem of the Golorado. ln addition,
the Distric't Court has approved the water rights for municipal
purposes on the property in a Plan of Augmentation W-3262.
An analysis by Wright Water Engineers, a @py is attached as
Exhibit 14, stiates, 'lt is our opinion that that the Proposed Rapids on
the Colorado PUD, as described in this letter, has an adequate
physical and legal water supply to meet its full build out water
demands."
D. Representation that all necessarv water riohts have been
obtained or will be obtained orior to submission of final plat
Response
RPUD.I 04.J.S€c lll.SubDiv Appl Gompliane.doc 75 1U'[r2m6
The applicants represent that all necessary water rights have been
obtained at the time of filing of this Application.
2. Evadence concernins the potabilitv of the proposed wator suDDlv for
the subdivision.
Response
The water system is an existing public water system approved by the State
of Colorado (PWSID CO 0123668). Laboratory tests of water samples
were reviewed by the State of Colorado prior to design approval- Copies of
the laboratory tests were provided to Building and Planning for review. A
copy is included in"Volume 3- Attachment 4".
3. tf a central water and distribution svstem is to be provided. a oeneral
description of the svstem as desioned bv a Golorado reEistercd
engineer
Response
An existing public water system will provide domestic water to the
subdivision. Mountain Cross Engineering has provided a "Rapids on the
Colorado PUD - Water Supply- Preliminary Plan" map that shows the
location of the two existing water wells, the treatment facility, existing water
line locations and size, fire hydrants, 150,000 water storage tank and
proposed water line and fire hydrant locations and new proposed streets.
Response
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association owns the existing
water system. The expansion will be construc'ted by Rapids Development
Please Note: Photoqraphs and descliptions of the water svstem arc
presented in Section I of this application-
Name of tte leoal entitv thatwill own and operate the svstem
RPUD.IO4.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Complhne.doc 76 1U'[r20Oo
Corporation and transferred to the Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners
Association by Bill of Sale.
B. Proposed method of ftnancins the svstem.
Response
The domestic water system is operational and can, without expansion.
serve aporoximatelv 92 of the proposed 104 units. Distribution lines,
associated vhlves, controls, fire hydrants and a non-potable system will be
financed commercialty. Preliminary construction loan approval has been
obtained from a Denver bank to provide funds for the subdivision
improvements.
C. lf conneation is to be made to an existinq water svstem. a letbr from
an autrorized rcpresentative of such svstem that the proposed
development will be seryed'
Resoonse:
LETTER INSERTED
RPUD.104.J.S€c lll.SubDiv Appl Compliane.doc 1U1raffi
October 3, 2006
To: The Board of County Commissionersi, Garfield County, Colorado
From: The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Subiect Domestic and Non-Potable Water Rights and Service to the
Proposed Rapids on the Colorado PUD - 1(M Single'Family Units
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Please consider this statement as a confirmation by the Rapids
on the Colorado Homeowners Association, the owner of the Rapids
Water System and certain Moore Ditch Water rights, that the
Homeownerc Association presently provides water service to the
Rapids Property located north of C.R. 335 that is proposed for PUD
zoning and subdivision into 104 single-family residentialsites.
Please be advised, the Homeowners Association, as owners of
the Rapids public water system, will orovide domestic and non-potable
water service to the planned unit development, when approved.
A review of water rights by Wriqht Water Enqineerc has
confirmed that the Moore Ditch water rights ".......has an adequate
physical and leoal suoplv to meet its full build out water demands."
Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
By: Gene R. Hilton, President
RPUD.1O4.J.S€c lll.SubDivAppl Compliance.doc 78 1U1t2006
Evidence from the Water Gourt - Water Division V. that the existino water
svsGm possesses adequate leqal water supplv to serve the proposed
development.
Response
The Water Court - Water Division 5, by approval of the Plan of Augmentation,
W-3262, attached as Exhibit 14, has acknowledged that the Moore Ditch water
rights, Priorities No. 3 and 14, are adiudicated and approved for municipal and
other uses on the subject property.
The approval of the Augmentation Plan by the Court removes the uncertainty
of the issues and values regarding uses other than agriculture. The
Augmentation Plan establishes the historic yield and consumptive use values
for domestic in-house use, amenity use, ponds and for continued agricultural
use.
Also reference Wrioht Water Enoineer analvsis and opinion orovided in
Exhibit 14.
D. lndividual Water Svstems.
NOT APPLICABLE. The existinq Rapids public water svstem will orovide
water service to the PUD.
E. lf aoplicable. a plan of ausmentation and a olan for subdivision water
suoplies.
Response
RPUD.1 0,l.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Compliance.doc 79 t&u:xn6
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association will provide potable
water to the proposed PUD from the existing approved public water system
owned by the HOA.
As previous[ Jioted, the District Gourt for Water Division 5 has approved a
Plan of Augmentation that applies to the Moore Ditch lands and More Ditch
water priorities No. 3 and 14, as well as other ditches and rights. The
Augmentation Plan stipulates consumptive use amounts to be used for
each residence for in-house domestic use based on a central W\ rTF
system, and for amenity inigation, ponds and wastewater treatment
options.
Ownership of the public water system was transferred from the Rapids
Development Corporation to the Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners
Association by Bilt of Sale recorded in Book 1308 at Page 569
ln addition, a non-potable water system will be instatled in the proposed
PUD, and will be owned by the HOA. The system will provide pressurized
amenity inigation water to all sites and open space tracG north of County
Road 335.
The existing wells, treatment facility, storage facility, easements and rights
of way are adequate forthe proposed 104-unit PUD. Additionaldistribution
lines and fire protection will be required for approximately 19 units. The
Preliminary Plan includes a "Rapids on the Colorado PUD Water Supply -
Preliminary Plan'map ("Exhibit 25) that shows the existing and proposed
water supply system.
S*tion L92 - Suoolemenbrv - Wlitv Plan - Sanitaru Sewer
A sanitarv sewaoe olan at tre same scale as tre Prcliminaru Plan shall
provide the followino in qraphic orwritten form:
RPUD.I q.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Cornplhne.doc 80 10t1t2@B
Response.
A Sanitary Sewage Plan is attached as Exhibit 25.
lf a public sewaoe svsbm is oroposed. evidence that provision
has been made for adequate sewaqe treatment works for ffie
subdivision:
R*ponse: The olant caoacitrr will be 45.(xx) oallons oer &v and frte
l(M unirs. will qenerate 38.tllN oallons oer dav. The olant will exc*d
the reouircmenb of the PUD.
Site Application Gapacity - GPD
STATE DESIGN GRITERIA - 100 GPD Per Percon
Number of Units
(X) Number of Residents Per Unit
(X) Gallons/ Capita I Day
=Required Plant Capacity I Day - GPD
1M
3.50
100
3g-400
Conclusion: Based on State of Colorado de$
rcauested in the site Aoplication is adeouate for the orooo*d
development
B. If a sewaqe treatsnent works is oroposed. a qeneral description of
the collection svstem and treatnent facilities as desiqned bv a
proftssional enqineer licensed in the State of Colorado.
Respoase
A detailed description of the proposed WWTF is included on page 2 of tre Sfra
Aoolicatbn, induded in "volume 3- Attachment{ as "Attachments 2 and 3'.
RPUD.104.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Comptiance.doc 81 1U*Nts
ln the Site Application, the proposed wastewater treatment facility is
described as a sequencing batch reactor plant that will inctude a
holding unit, preliminary treatment, one sBR Unit, post equalization
basin, UV disinfect ion, aerobic srudge holding for a design flow of
45,000 GPD and will be enclosed in a building. The construction cost is
estimated by Martin / Martin consulting Engineerc to be $661,000
collection lines will provide seruice to 1o4 singte-family sites.
1. copv of completed but unapproved colorado Departnent of
Application
Response
A copy of the "site Application and Engineering Report, wastewater
Treatment Facility, The Rapids on the colorado, Garfield county,
colorado", prepared by Martin/Ivlartin, lnc., an amendment to the
site location application, and a site Location Application
presentation made by the applicant to the Board of county
Commissioners is attached as a supplementalexhibit.
2. Name of the leoal entitv that shall own and operate the sewaqe
treatnent works.
Response
The developer, Rapids Devetopment corporation, wilt construct,
finance and operate the plant and collection system during the
construction phase of the project. Rapids Devetopment Gorporation
will charge a tap fee and monthly service charges to recover its
expenses and finance costs over an estimated three-year buildout
period- upon payout, Rapids on the cotorado Homeoumerc
RPUD.lg.J.S€c ttt.SubDivApptConpthne.doc U 1U4,tllm6
Association will become the owner of the facility and collection lines.
Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association agrees to accept
the facilities and operational requirements.
3. Proposed method of financino the sewaqe trcatmentworks.
Response
Rapids Development Corporation has made preliminary
alrangements for funds to construct the wastewater treatment
tacility and collection system.
c. lf public or private sewaqe facilities are to be provided bv an
existino district or throuqh connection to an existinq sewer
svstem. provide infomation.
Response
Not Applicable. New System.
o. tf ISDS Svstem is proposed provide reEuired information.
Response
Not Applicable. New Gentral System.
E lf ISDS svsbms are proposed. provide a manaoement plan.
Response
Not Applicable. New Central System
S*tion 4.93 - All Road and Utilitv Plans
Road and Utility Plans - Maps, prepared by Mountain Cross Engineering, are
attached to this Preliminary Plan Application as Exhibit 25.
The existing Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision has existing installed water
lines, electric lines, telephone lines, natural gas, paved roads, fire protection
RPUD.I0.l.J.Seclll.SubDlvApplComptiance.doc 8to
hydrants, two water wells, a 1s0,000 gallon water storage tank, access roads,
water pumps and a water-treatment facility.
Mountain Cross Engineering has designed road extensions, utility tocations
and prepared road plan and profites, drainage system ptans, sanitary sewer
collection system location, "as buiff water lines and proposed locations of the
expansion of the water distribution lines, sanitary sewer line Iocations. The
road and utility plans are attached to the Preliminary Plan Apptication as
.Exhibit 25".
Off€ite road impacts shatl be evaluated for subdivisions Uirouqh
A. Traffic lmoact Studv - The Rapids on the Colorado
Kimley-Hom and Associates has prepared a "Traffic lmpact studv - The
Raoids on the Colondo" relating to the impact of 121 units as originally
proposed- An Addendum reflectinq the reduction in lots to 1O4 is also
attached to the studv
Summarv
The analysis by Kimley-Horn and Associates afrirms that the impact on
lntenstate 7O at Exit 105 will not exceed 2}o/o and consequengy will not
aftct the counfi access shtus. tn addition, tree report addrc$es tfie
trafftc within the proiect and on G.R. 335.
completion of a trafric studv identifirino the volume of traffic oenerated
from the derelopm"nt bas"d on trip qeneration rate utilirino the most
rccent lnstitute of Traffic Enqineerc Trip Generation ]ranuat. to establish
fie averaoe dailv trafric (ADTI. The road impact fee shall be established
as a result of enterino the applicable date identified in the Road lmpact
Fse ealculalion wor{<sheet tocated in Appendix A lof flie subdivision
rcoulationsl.
RPUD.i(X.J.S€c llt.SubDivAppt Compliane.doc U 1U4r2006
e.
Reauirements for Monumentation are specified in the subdivision
reoulations.
Response
Monumentation will be provided in the subdivision as required. Boundaries of
the subdivision have previously been surveyed and monuments set.
RPUD. 1 04.J.Sec lll.SubDiv Appl Compthnce.doc 1U412006
The Ra rds
On the Colorado
Compliance Comprehensive Plan 2OO0
Garfield Coun g4 Colorado
RPUD.104.Ktldr-doc -86-
SECTION IV A
The Golorado
Revised Statutes (cRS) establish general strandards of review for rezoning land in
the County' The standard used for reviewing a rezoning request that is in
complianoe with the Comprehensive plan is
Garfietd County has
adopted Zoning Regulations and Subdivision Regulations that guide subdivision and
zoning actions within the county. rn addition, the county has adopted a
comprehensive Plan 2000 that provides a generat statement of direction for land use
planning in unincorporated Garfield County.
The Comprehensive plan
2000 establishes Goals, obiectives, Policies and Programs regarding land use within
three mites of municipalities. tn compliance with a Gomprehensive program 10.1, the
County prepared a map
hunfu' Colotah. (Attached as Exhibit 6). The Rapids property is classified on the
Comprehensive plan Map as
of New Castlet.
The Comprehensive plan 2000 also incorporates
induding the
map' The "Three Mile Area Plan" specifies land uses and densities that the Torn of
New Castle visualizes for the area.
RPUD.1g.L.Sec Vcornp ptan Comptiane.doc g7
municipal maps
-
t(y4l2006
The Town of New Castle Comprehensive Ptan map applies a classification of
"Cluster-Low Densifu-R l to the Rapids property. The ctassification, in other
Town of New Castle regulations, recommends a densitv of one unit per acre.
The proposed Planned Unit Devetopment is responsive to the community
goals and objectives of The Town of New Castte ("Town") as provided in the attached
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU) between the Town, Rapids Development
Corporation and The Rapids on the Cotorado Homeowners Association (Exhibit 3").
The Memorandum of Understanding confirms that the proposed cluster development
of 121 units is in general conformance with the Gomprehensive plan of the Town of
New Gastle.
The MOU specifies a density of 121single-family units for the proposed pUD,
provides for a waste water treatment facility ("UAA/TF") on the site, provides for public
ac@ss points and trails to the Colorado River, and addresses the sensitivity of the
open spaoe tract south of C.R. 335.
The Memorandum of Understanding also recommends that the BeCC
and,
subjec't to certain conditions in the MOU, "The Town suoports the pU,D based on its
......,
. The proposed Rapids on the
Colorado PUD is within three miles of the Torrn of New Gasfle and is therefore
considered to be within an Urban Area of lnfluence as defined in Garfield CounMs
RPUD.lg.LSoctVCornpphnComp$ane.doc 88
-
1U4/2006
ComDrehensive Plan 2000. The PUD is subiect to the fottowino Comprehensive Plan
Urban Area of lnfluence Goals. obiectives. poticies and proorams:
1. GOAL: Promote development in and around existino communities
Response: The Proposed PUD is an existing subdivision tocated one mile
west of New Castle. The Rapids property is classified on the Comprehensive
Plan Map as SubdMsion Wthin TwoMile Soherc of lnfluence (Town of New
Casf/el -.
The Comprehensive Plan 2000 also incorporates severat municipal maps
including the "Three-Mite Arca Plan. T n
Colondo" map. The "Three Mile Area Ptan" specifies tand uses and densities
that the Town of New Castle visualizes for the area.
The Town of New Castle Comorehensive Plan ctassifies the propery as
"Cluster-Low Density-Residential" that contemplates the property to be
subdivided for sinole Familv Residentiar at one unit perAcre.
The Aoplication Zone District Amendment and Subdivision Application
Preliminarv Plan are in compliance with the Gomprehensive Plan Goal.
GOAL: Ensurc frrat develooment and overall land use aolices occunino
in lhe Countu lhat will afrect tand use of a municioatitv arc compatible
with the existina zoninq and fufurc land use obi*tives of frie aporooJiate
municipalitrr.
Response:
The Torn of Neuv Casfle and the
Applicants have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding that
acknonr{edqes that the prooosed PUD is in comolianoe with the
89RPUD.i04.L.S€c !V Cornp Phn Complflane.doc 1U#zffi
Comorehensive Plan for the Town of New Castte. The MOU is attached as
Exhibit "6" and is addressed in para. 6 below.
3. O&JECTIVE:
Response:
The cluster Design, used in the proposed puD, increases open spaoe to
65.6% of the gross area of the PUD and establishes protections that limit use
of the open space. The location and design of the proiect, with large open
space tracts, will retain the rural character of the area.
4. o&lECTlvE: Develooment that requires urban seruices wiil be
Response:
The proposed PUD is an existino subdivision with paved roads, a public water
system, naturalqas, electricitv, teleohone and amenities in olace.
Utilization of the existing infrastructure for additional densitv complies with the
Comprehensive Plan Obiective.
5. O&IECTIVES: tlevelopment in an Urban Alea of lnfluence will have
Response:
The Proposed PUD is an existing subdivision that has a road system
constructed and in place. The road system is compatible with the adjoining
C-R. 335 as to visibility and traffic votume. Street designations will be in
compliance with the area streets.
RPUD.1O4.L.S6c tV Comp plan Compliance.doc
Zone District Amendments and individual proiects within defined Urban
Areas of lnfluence. will be consistent with local land use poticies.
Response:
The Application Zone District Amendment and Subdivision Application
Preliminary Plan, submifted for the proposed Rapids on the Golorado puD,
are subject to this Comprehensive Plan Policy. The proposed Rapids on the
Colorado PUD is within the Urban Area of lnfluence of the Tounr of New
Castle.
The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Policy essentially requires Zone
District Amendments and individual proiects within Urban Areas of lnfluence to
as opposed to the Garfietd
County Gomprehensive plan.
ln accodanoe with the Comorehensive Plan 2000 Policv. the Town of New
Gastle and the Aoolicants have entered into a Memorandum of Understandino
(MOU) in which:
r' Town acknowledges that, based upon the provisions of the MoU, the
PUD is in substantial compliance with the Town of New Casfle
Comprehensive plan.
{ Town of New Castle requests that the BOCC aoprove the applications.
The attached Memorandum of Asreement, Exhibit "3", approved by the Town
Gouncil of the Town of New Gasfle and the Applicants, specifies the
requirements that the proposed Planned Unit Devetopment must meet to be in
substantial complianoe with the Town of New Castle Comprehensive ptan.
Based upon the Memorandum of Understanding, the Torn of New Casge and
the Applicants have agreed to the following Mou provisions:
RPUD.I04.L.S€c M Cqnp ptan @mptiane.doc 9l 1U1t,2ffi
1 "Subject to the provisions of the Memorandum of
Agreement, the Town shall consent to and recommend to the
proposed PUD, including clustering, dedication of open spa@,
preserving the hillside as open space and the like although
not in strict compliance with the comprehensive plan as to
densitf- The Town supports the pUD because of its
as noted
above, the provision for a public trail with river access, and the
provision for a wastewater treatment facility with proposed use
as provided herein, provided however, that any such support
is contingent upon comptiance by Rapids with the provisions
of this paragraph, and further, so long as the puD proposal is
consistent with the following conditions:. . . .. . .,
PRoGRAiis= l, ,ooo"ution *ith lo"rl -uni"io.litio. h.
comorchensive land use mao wilt ffine an llrban Area ol lnfluence for
@ch iurisdiction. The ffinition wilt b fr,sed on booqruohv. qrcwur
pafun. ta nspottetion chancbristics and inout fiom arc affacfrld
iurtsdiction.
the Facilitv."
2. "The Town agrees that many etements of the
iluNlclPAL GOMPREHENSIVE ptaN The Town of New casfle has
acknowledged that the proposed PUD is in substantial compliance with the
Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan and supports the pUD Application
and Recommends the Bocc approve the site Application.
Reponse:
RPUD.t04.L.Soc M Cqnp plan Gompliane.doc 92 1U1[Z0[6,
The County prepared a map that complies with the poticy and it refers to the
map as the Prcposed Land Use Districts. Studv Areas 2 & 3. Garfield Countv.
Colorado. (Aftached as Exhibit 6),
The map establishes a Three-Mile Area Plan around each municipatity with an
additional Two-Mile Sphere of tnfluence boundary denoted around each
municipality.
The Rapids property is located within the "Two-Mile Sohere of lnfluenoe" of the
Town of New Castle and is ctassified on this map as Subdivision Within Two-
Mile Sohere of lnfluence (Town of New Castter
The Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan map applies a classification of
"Cluster-Low Densitv-Reside " to the Rapids property. The classification, in
other Town of New Castle regulations, recommends a densitv of one unit oer
acre.
PLEASE REFERENCE RESPONSE IN PARAGRAPH 6ABOVE.
Garfield Countv reoulations orovide:
Respoase
The flexibility of the PUD design process is used to ctuster home site
locations, to increase the amount of quality open spa@, to provkle higher
densities of development within identified urban areas of influenoe, to provide
a
cnBative and imaqlnative deiqn fior devetooment than qenerallv oossable under
conventional zonino and subdivbion rcqulations. lt is intehded that puDrs shall be
Dlanned to lrcurc oeneral confiormitv. both in substancer and bcauon. wi0r Ur" oo"b
and obhctiYoc of Ore nr*tedconrprulremlve olan Orrcuoh intcorated dweloonrent"
RPUD.l04.L.Sec lV Cqnp plan Conrpliance.doc 1U4/,2006/
a variety of housing types and to provide traits and public access to the
colorado River for the generat wetfare of the community.
Desiqn Obiectives of the Proposed PUD. Design objectives were
established for the proposed PUD to complv with zoninq requlation pumoses and to
and that the uniqueness and environmental qualities of the property were protected.
Sensitivity to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan 2000 (Area 2) on issues of
housing, transportation, recreation and open spa@, agriculture, water and sewer
services, natural environment and influence of urban areas helped define decisions
that resulted in the design of the proposed planned unit devetopment. Specific
objectives were:
1. Protect Bio Game Habitat The subdivision Open Space adjoins lands
considered to be winter range for big game. The dry steep hillside areas south
of C.R. 335 have juniper and sage on the hillside and Gambel oak, Utah
serviceberry, elm, coftonwood, rabbitbrush and other plants suitable for
brourse growing in the drainages. The PUD design increases the buffer
between big game habitat and the residentialsites in the puD.
2. Prctect Riparian Habitat Areas along the Colorado River and Garfield Creek
are habitat for beaver, ducks, geese and other smafl wildlife. The pUD design
and proposed covenants will better protect these areas by establishing the
land as "open Space" and removing it ftom individual ovvnership. The open
spaoe will be dedicated to the Homeowners Association with the requirement
that invasive plant species, such as Tamarac, must be controlled. A trail
system is proposed to parallel the riparian open spaoe areas along Garfietd
Creek and the Colorado River but witl be set bad< away ftom the banks so the
impact on the riparian habitat and wildlife will be minimized. Fishing access
will continue to be permitted.
RPUD.104.L.Sec tV Cornp ptan Comptiane.doc 94 1U4rzJ,J,j
Protect Natural Veoetation. rne design of the PUD leaves the naturat
vegetation along the steep hillside and in the riparian areas along Garfield
Creek and the Golorado River undisturbed. Provisions in the protective
Covenants will require that the Homeowners Association must control invasive
plant species and noxious weeds. ln addition, the Homeowners Association
may reduce the risk of wildfire by removing dead trees and other fuel from the
riparian areas as required.
ilinimize lmpact on Aqriculhrre. rne design objective complies with the goal
of the Comprehensive Ptan "to ensure that existing agricultural uses are not
advercely impacted by development-".. The design of the PUD provides an
open spa@ buffer to the 20-acre +/- A/R/RD Brannon subdivision exemption
parcel that has been used for catfle grazing. The puD and the Brannon
SuMivision exemption paroel are also separated by Garfield Greek, a geologic
banier.
5. iiinimize lmpact On Tlro Adiacent Properties. The design provides open
spaoe buffers between the PUD single-family home sites and the two adjacent
single-family residential subdivision exemption properties. (JACE - 2.O1acres
and Collins - 2.66 acres)
6. lmprove Visual lmpact ln the Colorado Rirer Corridor. The design is
sensitive to visual impacts along the lnterstate 70 / Colorado River conidor.
By using a cluster design, open space has been increased to 670/o of the pUD
arca and all home sites have been reduoed in size and located further aw€ry
from the river. Open Space will be dedicated to the Homeowners Association
and will not be developed.
7' taintain lnioation Use of the toore Dibh. The cluster design considers
and provides for continued inigation of open spa@ and amenity areas that
have been historically inigated with water from the Moore Ditch. Water
RPUD.lg.L.S€c MComp ptan Comfliance.doc 95 1U4t,,0xJ6
infiltration from irigation would continue to be available to protect wells in the
area.
B. fne
PUD design retained Paddle Wheel Lane and Whitewater Lane as the primary
access points to the subdivision. The historic ac@ss road on the west end of
the property is also retained for limited access to the Open Space tract and to
the proposed wastewater treatment facility.
9. f-ot
sizes in the Preliminary Plan have been reduced from a minimum of trp-acres
square feet'in the existino olat to an average of 12,000 square feet for a
single-family residential lot. The reduction in the lot size increases the
"common open space" that can be used by all residents of the community.
The Preliminary Plan design provides quality hom+sites that comply with the
Comprehensive Plan policies to promote a tttnge of lot sizes and diverce types
of housing.
to' School Bus Stops. Running tanes on C.R. 335 were constructed for school
buses and other vehicles as a requirement of approvat of the existing
subdivision- The requirement insured school buses could safely load and
unload students within the subdivision and then safely reenter traffic on C.R.
335- Three bus stop areas have been identified within the subdivision that are
centrally located and are shown on the Preliminary Plan map. The proposed
stops are located within reasonabte walking distanoe of the residences, as
reoommended in the Comprehensive plan.
11' too-Year Flood Plain. The planning and design criteria for the preliminary
Plan requires all building envelopes and facilities to be above the 100-year
flood plain. The flood plain data used for designing the pUD is based upon
Flood Plain Map c-1g preparcd for Garfield and Mesa counties. The
RPUO.1O4.L.Sec MCornp ptan Compliane.doc 96
-
1U4t20o6
Preliminary Plan topographic map incorporates a resurvey of surface
elevations made after the County approved the Floodplain Speciat Use permit
and fill materialwas moved from the higher portions of the property and placed
onto portions of lots that were within the 100-year flood plain.
After fill material was used to raise the etevation of building envetopes
in flood plain areas, a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Cotorado,
provided an as-built certification that the building envelopes for the platted
Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision (3&Lots) were above the 100-year
floodplain elevation (Reference Exhibit "21). A second certffication, by a
Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Cotorado, ertifies regarding
the Preliminary Plan.
tz. Road lmprovements. Ptan and Profile maps of roads within the pUD are
attached as Exhibit 25 in Volume 2 of this application.
The developer is advised that road impact fees may apply.
ts. Wabr Svstem Extensions. Extensions of the existino public water system
are to be designed, constructed and operated according to State standards. A
non-potable system will be installed to each lot to provide pressurized amenity
inigation waterfrom the Moore Ditch.
Mountain Cross Engineering has designed the water line locations for the
additional units. (Reference Exhibit 25).
te. Housins Goals. The "HOUSING GOALS", specified in the Comprehensive
Plan of 2000 - Garfield County, were considered in depth in the planning and
design of the proposed PUD. The goal of the applicant is to provide housing
of diverse types at a wide range of affordabitity.
RPUD.104.L.Sec lV Gornp plan Compliance.doc 97
,ncome.
The Gross Median lncome information for Garfietd County is subject
to significant differences between "up valley" and .down vafley" variances
in wages and housing costs.
The applicants have had analysis prepared that indicate the
appraised prices for the houses will be in the "mid-range" of the local
market. The density of the subdivision is limited to one unit per acre by the
urban sphere of tnfluence that in tum affec.ts density, costs and
marketability.
o Goal: "Desianate oronrffr favorabte zones adiacent tor communitl
limits are encouraoed." The comprehensive plan includes a map
entitled prcmsa Ura Use OtsnAs. g
counfu. co". The map identifies the property, requested to be rezoned, as
Casflel.
The property, proposed for re-rezoning to pUD, is in the zone designated
for grorth and is within he rwo-Mile spherc of hnuen
New castle. . The New casfle comprehensive plan "zones" the property
1. The property is approximately one mile from Nerr casfle, one of the
fastest growing towns in Garfield County.
2- The proposed density of one unit per acre and use for single-family
residential is compatible with the Mountain Shadorvs subdivision
and Aoole Tree Park located one.half mile to the east of the site.
The PUD is proposed for single-family residential use. The
proposed use is compatible with sinqte-famitv use of adjacent
RPUD.l04.L.SecMCornpplanConplhne.doc 98 1U4l2m6
neiqhbors. The preliminary plan design provides a buffer between
the PUD's single.famiry residences and the adjacent properties.
3. The proposed use of the site is for singte-family residences. The
homes will be priced so that peopre in the area can afford them.
The use is compatible with other existing subdivisions in the area
and complies with the comprehensive pran objec.tive that
4' The commerciaUgeneral subdivisions located across the river from
the proposed PUD are compatible with residential use in the pUD
because they are separated by the river, utilize different ac@ss
roads, are not very visibre from one propeo to the other and the
uses do not conflict with each other.
5' The Riverside Park Subdivision, a @mmercial subdivision on C.R.
335, is located 2.2 miles to the east of the pUD, in New casfle. The
subdivision incrudes Mr. T's, Trus-Fab, Aqua-Tec and other suppry
businesses that will benefit from construction and service
requirements of the proposed puD. The service businesses are
compatible in use and location of the proposed puD and will
mutually benefit each other.
o
The mix of housing is ptanned as follorrs:
1. Larger homes are to be constructed on rots near the river.
2- Homes to be located on lots that adjoin open space tracts may be
smaller and less expensive than those with Colorado Riverfrontage.
3.
o
RPUD.1O4.LSec M Corp p[rn Compfnnce.doc
-
99 1U4ttao,F ,
Objectives of the proposed cluster development were established to create
benefits to the general welfare of the community. The benefits arc noted in
Section I of the Apolication.
Goal: To provide all tvpes of housinq that ensures current and future
residents eouitable housino opportunities. which are desioned to
provide safe. efficient residential structurcs that are compatible with
and that protect the nafural environment
Homes to be built in the PUD are a mix of housing types and values, as
recommended in the Comprehensive Plan 2000. The design of the
subdivision was based on many factors including those that relate to the
environment, safety and affordability. (Ref. Sections t, ll and tll of the
Application for Zone District Amendment and Application Subdivision
Preliminary Plan).
ts. Wastewater Tleatment Facility (WWTFI. An onsite Wastewater Treatment
Facility capable of serving the PUD will be designed constructed and operated
according to State standards. The utilization of a wastewater treatrnent facility
witl alleviate thirty-three separate ISDS systems approved in the existing
subd ivision, therebv im proving water o ual itv.
to. Provide Recreational Amenities Within the Develooment Open spaoe
lands (65.67o of the proiect) will be dedicated to the Rapids on the Colorado
Homeownerc Association. An amenity pond has been constructed in the park
area and a tot lof, a sporb field, basketball court and a uriver trail' will be
constructed. Fishing and hiking acoess is availabte to the pubtic.
Ulilitv Zone District. A separate Utility Zone District with its own performance
standards is specified within this application. The standards address the issue of
how the common water and wastewater facilities will be controlled or govemed by the
existing Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association.
RPUD.104.L.Sec M Comp Plan Conrpliane.doc 100 1U4l2000
Proposed Development Plan Reference Sections l, ll and lll. The following table
summarizes the Rapids on the Colorado Planned Unit Development Land Use:
LAND USE SUMIUARY Lots Acres Percentage
Cluster Low Densitv Sinole-Familv
District
Open Space District
Utility Zone District
Waste Water Treatment Facilitv
Tank Site. Pump House & Well
(Pump House 30 Ft Width By 50 Ft Depth)
Rapids No. 2 Well
(Site: 20 Ft Width By 20 Ft Depth)
Future Water Welt Sites - Ten
(Each Site 20 Ft Wide by 2O Ft Depth)
New and Existins Roads
Totat
1O4 28.746 23.6620/o
79.747 65.il2%
1.293 1.0640/o
Acre
1.038
0.051
0.002
0.025
11.702 9.6320/o
]21a9g 100-00%
Proposed Uses
The uses proposed in the Application Zone Distric't Amendment are as follows:
4.08.03 PUD Tvpe of Uses
Uses to be allowed within the PUD are as follows:
1. Gluster Low Densitv Sinqle-Familv District- SECTION ll Page 17
2. Open Space District - SECTION ll Page 18
3. Utilitv District - SECTION ll Page 19
4. Roads -Exhibit 2 - Preliminary Plan Map; Plan and Profiles - Ex. 25
Facilitv Gonstruction and Operation
The applicant will be responsible for construction or installation of the folloring
facilities and the Homeowners Association will be responsible for their ongoing
maintenance and repair as noted:
l0lRPUD.1O4.L.Sec !V Cunp Plan Conpfiance.doc
lmorovement
Existinq lntemal Roads
Additional lntemal Roads
Existinq Water Svstem
Water Line Extension
Non-Potable Water System
lntemalTrails
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Park Facili$/Open Space
Natunal Gas, Telephone, Elect.
Recreational Facilities
Standard
County/PUD Plan
County/PUD Plan
State and Coun$
State and County
Engineer Design
5 Ft Wid€/6' Gravel
State Standard
Engineer Design
Utility Co. Design
Engineer Design
llaintenance
Homeowners Assn
Homeowners Assn
Homeowners Assn
Homeownerc Assn
Homeourners Assn
Homeoumers Assn
Homeowners Assn
Homeorners Assn
Utili$ Company
Homeovners Assn.
lnstallation
Completed
Applicant
Completed
Applicant
40% Complete
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
85% Gomplete
20% Complete
RPUD.104.L.S€c lV Cornp Plan Compftance.doc t02
OF COMMUNITY
General Welfare. The proposed Planned Unit Development zoning alows a
cluster design to be used to retain a rural character in the community. The cluster
design provides a large amount of open space with trails along the river for public
use' The cluster design also provides numerous benefits to the oeneral welfare of flre
communitv some of which are listed below:
o open space. The puD design will increase the common open space
from 18% in the existing subdivision to 65.60lo in the proposed planned
Unit Development.
o Population Growth. The homes to be constructed in the proposed
PUD will herp meet demand for housing to support energy
devetopment in Garfierd county. rt has previousry been detennined
that subdivision of the property would be in the best interest of the
health, safety, morals, convenien@, order, prosperity and wetfare of
the citizens of Garfield County.
o River Frontase Access To public. Approval of the pUD would
provide the public with valuabte recreationat access to approximatelv
o Diverce Housino Tvpes. The proposed pUD provides diverse housing
types at a time when a in Garfield
County due to an increase in energy development.
o water Qualitv. Approvar of the pUD apprication wourd improve water
qualitv by eliminating 33 septic systems and providing cenhal
wastewater treatment in their place.
RPUD.104.L.Soc M Conp ptan @rnptiance.doc 103
New Gastle Gomprehensive Plan. Provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding with the Town of New Castle, provides the following
community benefits:
r' Densitv. Limits density to one single-family unit / one acre in
conformance with the Town of New Castle Comprehensive Plan.
Wildlife Habitat. Provides a buffer to wildlife habitat on the open
space tract located south of C.R. 335 and west of C.R. 312
(Reference Exhibit "31.
Public Access. Provides a parking area and access conidorc for
public use of trails along the Colorado River.
Encouraqe Grourffr. The proposed PUD is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan 2000 objective to encouraqe qrowth near existinq
urban areas.
tlunicipal Gomprehensive Plan. The PUD conforms to the Town of
New Castle's Comprehensive Plan. (Reference Exhibit 6).
Existinq Subdivision. The property is an existinq platted single-family
subdivision with infrastructure in place. Density increase would reduce
develooment sorawl by increasing density within an existing
subdivision near an existing community.
e Cluster Development. The cluster development design, of the
proposed PUD, incorporates ooals and obiectives of the
Gomorehensive Plan 2000 regarding housing, transportation,
recreation, open space, trails, agriculture, water servi@, sewer
servi@, natural environment and urban areas of influence.
o Public Safetv and Welfare. Public safety, health and urelfare of County
residents has been addressed in the following professionalstudies:
{ Lincoln-Devorc - Geologic, Sub-Surface Soils and Radioactive
Analysis,
r' WriohtWater Enoineerc Water Study for Support of Augmentation
Plan Application Raoids on the Colorudo Water Suoplv Analvsis.
RPUD.'I U.L.Sec lV Canp Plan Compliance-doc IM
Analvsis confirms that the existing water system is adequate for the
proposed Planned Unit Development.
/ District Gourt - water Division 5- Approved a Decree in case
w-3262 Plan of Auqmentation for up to 9700 residentiar units,
including the Rapids on the colorado property. Reference wright
Water Engineers above.
r' Kimtev-Horn and Associates - Traffic lmpact study, lnterstate 70
Exit 105, county Road 335 and lntemat Rapids on the Gotorado
Roads.
/ Hepworth-Pawlak - soils and foundation report for waste water
Treatment Facility site Application; Performed tests for the
proposed wastewater treatment facility foundation. And reported no
groundwater (in wet year).
{ Enartech. lnc. - Flood Plain Analysis, site Grading plan and
certification that Building Envelopes for specific lots were
effectively removed from the 10O-year flood plain.
r' Mountain Cross Enqineerino - Prepared Drainage Study and
Drainage Design for proposed Planned Unit Development.
r' tountain Grcss Enoineerinq - Prepared Trafftc Study of pUD
and existing traffic on c.R. 335. Report indicates c.R. 33s woutd
be at 77o capacitv to the west of the PUD and 357o of capacity east
of Apple Tree.
r' tountain cross Enqineerins - Designed additionar subdivision
roads and prepared road profiles for submittal with the preliminary
Plan. Prepared water tine plan and sanitary sewer line plan.
r' Richard Holsan survevino - set Property oomers for the ptafted
subdivision and prepared topography maps after fill pracement and
compaction authorized by BOCG Resolution gT-2O.
r' Enartech. lnc. Designed existing 33-lot subdivision, water
system and supervised construction
RPUD.1O4.L.S6c M Conp Phn Compliance.doc 105 1U1tzm6,
r' BOCG and Planninq commission Aoproval. The Garfield
county Board of county commissioners ("Bocc) and the
Garfield County Planning Commission have previously determined
that subdivision of the subject propefi for use as single-family
home sites is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and "the
proposed use is in the best interests of the health, safety, morals,
convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of
Garfield Countf.
Summaru - Reasonable Relationshio to Wetfare of the Communitv, The
Aoolication - Zone District Amendment and Subdivision Apotication - Pretiminarv plan
provide numerous benefits that contribute to the general welfare of the community
and comply with the Comprehensive Plan goals. Benefits of special importance,
include:
lncreases quality open space in the subdivision from 18% to 65.60lo.
Provides housing to meet an existing housing shortage,;
lmproves water quality by eliminating 33 septic systems;
Protects wildlife habitat;
Provides public parking and Colorado River frontage aocess and trails to
3,500 feet of river frontage;
Provides growth in an area specified for growth as "Cluster Low Densitv
Sinole Familv Residential at One Unit Per Acrd. in compliance with the
o
EI
tr
o
tr
o
ln summarv. the many benefits noted above and in the Aoolications evidence
the proDosed Planned Unit Development has a reasonabte retationship to the urcffare
of the communitv.
RPUD.1O4.LS€c lV Co.np Plan Compliance.doc 106
sEcTtoN tv c
Comoliance With Comorehensive ptan 2000
Garfield Countv. Colorado
Goals. Obiectives. Policies and Proqrams. The Applicant has provided
responses to applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objec,tives, Poticies and
Programs to demonstrate that the proposed Zone District Amendment is in
compliance with the Comprehensive ptan and bears a reasonable retationship to the
welfare of the community.
Cluster Low Densitv Sinsle-Familv Residential The Zone District Amendment
Application requests the existing 97.269-acre Rapids on the Colorado subdivision
and an adjacent 24.219-acre tract be rezoned from A/l and A/R/RD to planned Unit
Development (PUD). ln addition, a Subdivision Application - Preliminary ptan is
submifted requesting approval to subdivide the property into 121 sinqle.famity lots,
one wastewater treatment site and 81.258 acres of open space and utilities. The
proposed PUD density would be one unit per acre.
The
Garfield County Zoning Regulations state: "The overall residential density shal be no
greater than t*o (2) dwellino units per qross acre *ithin the PUD, provided however,
that the County Commissioners may allow an increase to a maximum of fifteen (15)
dwelling units per gross acre.
The proposed pUD is located in an
area one mile west of New Castle that is classified in the Comprehensive Plans for
Garfield County and the Town of New Castle as Urban Area of lnfluence - Two Mile
RPUD.I O4.L.Soc M Comp plan Cornpliane.doc 107 1U4t2W6
Countv and Municipa! Land Use Policies. Section 10.1 Urban Area of
lnfluence, defines the relationship between the County and Municipal land use
policies and a specific policy addresses this issue Section 10.0 Comprehensive
policies.
Plan and policies.
The Town of New Castle adopted the 1996 Communitv Plan Reooft. Nqw Casile for
Futurc Land Use and Growth. The document included a map that was tifled &M/e
Area Plan Town of New Castte and Garfietd Countv. Cotondo that identified
proposed land uses for the area within three miles of the Town. The Comprehensive
Plan 2000- Garfield County then incorporated the map. The Rapids on the Colorado
is labeled as Cluster Low Density Residential (1 du/ac) for the area between the
south river road, C.R. 335, and the Colorado River. The lands owned by the
applicants south of the C.R. 335 were inconectly shown on the County
Comprehensive Plan map as State tand. The Town and the Applicants addressed the
issue in public meetinqs with the New Castle Planning Commission and the Torn
Council. The Town and the Applicants entered into a Memorandum of Agreement
that recognized the benefits of the proposed PUD plan and the Town agreed to 121
single'family residential units, as shown on the Sketch/Preliminary plan Map. ln the
Memorandum of Agreement, the Town aqreed to recommend that the WWTF Site
New Castle. The Applications comply with the density and land use requirements
contained in the Torrn of New Castle Land Use Plan, and with other requirements
Aoolication be aDproved and the Town to support the 121-unit PUD aoplacation.
(Exhibit 3).
. The Application Zone District Amendment
is in comDtiance with the Comprehensive Plans of Garfield Countv and the Town of
RPUD.104.L.Seo M Cqnp Plan Cornpiance.doc 108 1U41,2ffi
contained in the Memorandum of Agreement. The process took sixteen months to
reach the agreement with the Town of New Castte.
The Apolication - Zone District Amendment P|JD has been shown to be in oeneral
Health. Safetv and Welfare. Subdivision of the property has previoustv been
found to be in general comptiance with the recommendations set forth in the
Gomprehensive Plan (Resolution No. 96 -70). Subdivision of the property was
determined to be in the best interest of the health, safetlr, morals, convenience,
order, prospenty and welfare of the citizens of Garfield county.
Plans of Garfield County and the Town of New Casfle
RPUD.i04.L.Sec M Comp ptan Comptiance.doc 109 1Uu,.o/ln
The Ra rds
Table of Contents
Volume 1 - Applications and 10 Exhibits
Volume 2 - Exhibits I 1-25
Volume 3 - Atbchments
On the Colorado
RPUD.1(X.M.l-ldr.doc - t1O-1UM2006
The Rapids on the Colorado
Exhibits
Volume 1-
Bxhibit 1-Section III. Comprehensive plan 20fl) Areas 2 & 3
Eilibit 2 - Preliminary Ptan Map (tf X f 7)
Exhibit 3 -Town of New Castle Memorandum of Understanding
Exhibit 4-Repids on the Colorado Existing Plat and B(rcC Resolutions 9G70 1p1llt7t46
Exhibit 5 - Map of 6As Built, Roads end Utitities
Exhibit 6 - Garfield county comprehensive plan Map Land use Districb
Erhibit 7 - Map - Current Tnningof the property
Erhibit E-Vicinity Map
Erhibit 9 - Ass€ssor's Map & Addresses of Adjacent Owners
Exhibit 10 - Legal Description of Property
Yolume2
Exhibit ll - Deeds, Easements" Bill of Sale, Memorandum of understanding
Erhibit 12 - Ilced - Hilton Open Space Tract
Erhibit 13 - Title Insumnce Commitment
Exhibit 14 - Wright Water Engineers - Water Supply Analysls, Augmentation Phn, tilest Dlvide
Contract, Permits, Pump Tests, State Approval of Design.
Exhibit 15-Traflic Anatysis - county Road 335 - (Mountain cross Engineering)
Exhibit 16 -Drainage Report and plan (Mountain Cross Engineering)
Erhibit 17 -'Soils Hazard Map, Soil s Type Mep and Department of Agriculture Descriptions
Exhibit 18 - Slope Ilazerd Mep
Exhibit 19 - Goolog and Subsurface Soils (Lincotn-Devorc)
Exhibit 20 - Maps - Elk and Mule Dcer Concentrations
Erhibit 2l - Certilication for Phcement of Filt In Accordance With Floodplain Spociat Use pemi!
Floodplain Special Use permig Ftoodptain Map C-lg
Exhibit 22 - Protective Covenants
Exhibit 23 - Rapids on the Colorado Homeownert Associetion Articles of Incorporation end By-Laws
Exhibit 24 - Service Letterc- Utitity Companies
Exhibit 25 - MaPs - Road Plan and Proliles (Eristing and Additionat); Existing and proposed Utility Line
RPUD.'I O4.O.Table of ConbnB.doc tu1t2m6
Volume 3 - Attachments
Attachment 1. - Traflic Impact Study - The Rapids on the Colorado.
Attachment 2 -Site Location Application and Report - Addendum (Wasteweter Treatment Facility)
Attachment 3 -Site Location Application and Report (Wasteweter Treatment Fecility
Attachment 4-Public Water System - The Rapids on tnl Cobrado
RPUD. 1 B.O.Table of Conbnts.doc tot4lLoM
EXHIBIT 1
Gomprehensive Plan of 2000
Garfield Gountlr, Colorado
Section llt - Goa}s, Obiective, policiea, plograms
EXHIBIT 1
Bfilbit I page I
==E5=E- ;
-EstE E=
I:=IEH;;EE
*nEEEEEE
gre
==$*E33:=,
E;iB=EiEEisggrgE=
e lilffiffi[ mffinffimlE
a*-ftr:I
B:
=<)<>\
!.-r{ci=
+i5Ge\f <)
ct)(kIq
=>-al-- -l- )S.C-)
Q_-
==tstPa
Ai trE)o- c/ia..S
iI
ffi
'-E
Li'
Exhibit I Page 2
EEi
H*
E:filbit I Page
9-frlfflle Area Pilar
Tsuam of SJe'tet
Colorado
Wsf,
TVPE
t
L___..-
!
I+
:-;t!
-J
litli/,_i__ \ fli
:"* _*+_I (.!l
N
ii+*i:i+,';i- ;
I ;:1it:,:lr:,li.lii'i.r :: ::j',1...,,
,,, .-':"-;''t .+:
:
of lrf,uence t{.G.
t-] AGRpULTTTRAL RESorrRcE
El BTTREAU oF LAIul ucmr'rr
E| cLUsrER LowDENsrrY REs
T crusrER UED ENsrrY REs
OOI'UERCIAI'NEIGHBR}D OOTiI/
hIDI,SIRIAL
UD(ED I.ISE
OPENSFACE
EEN SPACEAffiI RES
OPEN SPACE RURAL RES
STATEU'II.DI-IFEAREA
3{lePht Boundary
Tour Boudary
o (u5o,5 1@r-EFr1 rlllles
lGT GISrc til.E AREI HTil AOURGE
i.3{frArE Phn lg.llqcartb Lilld lblln\(19).
BISEIAP$UrcE
f . ilcr Ca* U.SLG.S. l2l.@ 75 qndalgb n
2 GaliS Cotaty Rd E tsltp thpettmmrffi
0$q.a eaftts couf Blffip a ffif Dlp{fiEtr(hemq.
L/lld
IlIS.ti.rlDED AlISEr. S IEMDlFGt Ot
eritu 3
Exhibit { Page'
Com[renensiuo Plan o[ 2000
Gartield Gounty, Golorado
$tudU [rea$ l-3
tGarlield County Section III
Garfield Combrehensive Plan Goals. Obiectives. Policies and Prcersms
provido tho bosis fu stbsequcnt Qioctivuc
policr€s and prograos The odcr in ufti& gols
uo statcd docs uot erggcst ay ruk c picity.
Obtcdw
An Qioctivu is a realistic 8nd achicvatilo
statcocot of inteotio. It tA ott ufist is
proposod to bo ampliSod and rdrc to a
psrdculss issro within tho gcl strtomd.' An'
gbjectivc dtho prcviosly **al bolsforg gcl
nigbt bc "to povi&'thc mos to cocunago
houshg thst is mccrecpmsivrtothoncdc of
thc residcatE' Thcsc stEteoeats indicac smd
cdcr stcpcnccdodto ffiy qrtthchorsftrg g6l
wieot going so frr as to spri:ifytho actio.i
ta&co"
PoW
A poticy ffiii thc basfu reo uAicn dcfiilGd
docisiirns rinrst UoEiada Ii ir aprociso strtcmcat'
of an aCio c gui&lino to be follourEd in
crryiry oS 6o gcl c Qiocdrc. Fc cxuplg
tho policy of elimina'' g praotioes that rsict
hosing prodgi,o ruig[t bc ftlfitlcd by
?widing a grcatcr regc ofzming distric8 ud
ld sizcs aedablo by ftmilics of dl inmo
lcyolr.' Ihis policy, nsod cry frr o ormph,
suggcsts spccific artior to bo t"lrcn withot
dfiiliqg tho ."" ry* s&ps inrch,ld.
Prqna
A progro is tho btucgim to bo 6lloncd fu a
ryccifia progru, ptm c prqioct htcodd to
acomplish a particnlar polisy. To carryat
policics, progranr nigbt be nd rfifot
rccmncad chmges in zoohg and lmd ruo
regulsdm& c sct ot rmmcndod dosign c' pcrformaaco staodrds" nogrms rofu mcc
ryccific in thG&' intat ttFn tho smcam d
gcls and objoctiw. ftcyrrycscatttomd
dftect oc6od to €rry o, thc ooprchcasiru
plan elemcnt to uihich 6cypcnain-
AIthorg! timc tancs fu aompliSing tho
. trAred progr@s hsvtbcca *Abli$o4 eo
aEAd implcrnentatim of 6e pnogranr nsy bo
costrainod by tbo followiqg; gv".ilablb sa6ng;
ftmding fu ortsiab asSsmce od, policy
INTRODACTION
lhli Seaim cstatilishcs basis policy dircctio
fa land usc in (hr6dd Comty, lhsd o is$cs
ideatifio<l during carp ptascs of thc
Coprchcosivc Plm Proocss. Issrcs idcatifid
by Colory otrcials, rcsidcots and plaoniog stafi
represeatod the first stagc ofpolicy frroulatio.
After issucs EG idcotifiod, gols *ttc
€stablish€d to addrcss theso issttc$ O@ives
aro prcseqrci to guido tho achisvcmcat of shtcd
gel* fcrllourcd ty propsts to a&isvc 6cso
oqoctivrc. Policios sod Prograns rcprcseat thi
implemcotatim o@p6cst of&c Ph. Ito
cftoctiveaess oftbo policics thu follow ig
dhocty depeadcat o qdating zmiag ad
a$divisio rqulatios cmsisteot witt tho
gcocral dfoocim dcscibod in cach socdo.
Socio Itr is diyidGd irfio ttc ftUowing soctiog
Citizco Involvtmcog IIolsIDg; Transpctado;
Cmnerciat md Indrstrial Dovelopmcqg '
Rscrcatio ad OpGo Spaoci Agri<rlhrral UsB;
Watcr od Scrwr Scrviccq Ndural Envirmmcag
Natural Rcsore Bdracnim; tlbanArca of
Influcaog lho Cmprthcasirc Pla Ifid t so
lvfap; ud thc Eur&oneotal Cosraint lUrp.
FON'{AT
OBI$ otijeairres, poticics aod programs aro
catablishd itr thb soctim as a'hicrurdy of
statcorcots. gacU *lcodiug lsvcl b@mcs
mcospocifio in iotcat Bdd lcss abstract ir
&tcrprctadm. lbc sct ofrukiags to dcscribc
6bhicrrc&yisas&llotr!:l. Ciuls2. ObJdtY*3. Poltcb1 *ogwts
G@ts
A gosl ls c ststc@cot ofvohrcs desir*t bythc
dtizc$ offficld Cotnty. Sine it is
cilpesscd as aa idcal ft b dificolt tri obtaia Fa
cxinplq a gol mielrt bo toprovido adoqruc i
hqrsing fu dl rcaidcG" Ttis vuding is
offcicatly hoad to campess alt sbcetesios
dltaryh it dc not povi& fu thc mcthods to
amptishtho gpat Ttcrcerq aU gcls
Pago t
l
E filblt {
diroctim by tho Bosrd of Conty
Commissimcrs.
1.0 PWLTCPARTICIPATION.
hrblic pcticipdim rtprescots thc lin& bdurcca
tho decisim-making pnocess andthe cmmunity
in nfrich thcc deisios asc mada lilumarors
cmmcots dringtho Summcr Wct$qc of
l99l r€fl€ct€d tho ncil to maiiilain md imporc
thc iotrractim bcfirm lhc lmd uo procss ud
thc pr,iblic. Spocific cocccns idcatified sincofro
ta* Cmprchcady Plan upddo uo as &llwr:
o Aoccssto rhc policy inti'^g proccss must bo
opmdod to'cosro p$lip puticipdim frm
thoso most a&ctoil by laod use docisimAo PtmingOmntssim mdQunty
ommissio nocing ed p$tic.hcaringr fu
majaprqioca shoild ocqrnear lto
poposadproisq "
o ltc uso of Citizca Advisry Cmnitlocs
rc1recots m cffictivptool in dovrlqing
'ooilleorfls aod €nffiiEgthatralurruil iiercs .
arc inchdoil in thc dcisio making'Droccssi;o Smctimca, CotDtycodcs aadrcgulatios ao
dificult to udcrstan4 aod mty limit
involvtacst h thc plaonhg p.o6to All oorutynUcploonlng cfforts mu*bo
reryonsiw to 6c divcrsity auimgarb ucas
iatcCornty.
GOAL
A, ,ntegrol porr or@ily lad usc plonlnfry b
thi oplntanlfilor dtbas to bc lnwlycd h il
phaw ofthcilutnWlnow,
O&IECIIVES
t.l To &vdop ud maintain a citizca
iarlolvc@Got program lhst olcarp dcfines tho
procoarcs by ufiich tho public cao bc
involrrcd in lmd usc md pdioy docisios.
12 To casro did ltcro rrill bc cmtiouity of
citizco inrrtfitcmot
13 To ca$rc thd citizcag haw apccss to
infcrndio Sd coabtcs tho idcatificorim
mdompr6codo ofissrcs.
1.4 To cnsncttd lho citia inrolvrocat
progru mplics rrfib stattory
rcq*cncm.
1.5 The Board of Ccnmty Cmmissioers, tho
Plrnning Cmmissim and Plmning $afr
shaild bc responsirc to issuca raisd in ttc
planningporc.
1.6 To cosnc that all rqios ofthc Comty uo
all,or€d cqual rcpreseotatio md
particfuaio into tho plaoaing pro€s.
l.l A citizco inrmlvcncat program will bo u
mgoittg Poe&ro ftUgu'Ed bY &rfidd
Cqrnty. The citizca involncodfogru
rill inddc d tr minimrmrS
i n Uic ndiricg ofallpropocoAplunhg
activitieq oosistcat with stttry
rcquir€offi;
B. hftlicamtosllFflbdocumcats. ..mdmafiaialsrclaodtoprqcod
ploning Ecdvi6c$
C. hrblicparticipotim wil bo caurragpd
d pnblic mcctingl and hcaringr to
reirp inpt o prqood planning. ..activiticsandisss.
12 lto cstablishmcot of Citizca Adviscy
Comittccs will bo cooragodto
provido reomucaddios od tccbaical. advioto6oContyomattcrsddd
toCoprchcarivoPlao mcodmoB'
anddcComtSmidcfuss lhc
ncobcrshipg purprc eod fuBd oflhc
Citizco Advfury Cmmitts arc ar
bllow*A. Itomcubcr$ipoftbccc t'
Comitta will bo basod o
rmmca&tiogby6o
Pl&nfug omnisdo, Ed
foosotochnical copcrds. odmnrmityrprcccot8fim"B. ThoComtYrhrll6qr6{ls
rmn-cadatims tnsdc by
Citia Adviscy Conifocs.
Bdthcrmmcadatios md- thcrcsporosshallbo
DsintaindhrwiEcofuD d
will bcmc port oflho prHic
. rffid.C. Ttc(hrfiddCodyDlsmhg
CmoissicgclhoBoudd
CorutyConissiocrcwill
initfufiq al s minirnum ofatrry
ft,o(rlrml apililicpoe
E 6lblt I Page 6
.:. .r.
rR(rcnat6
to rcview tho Cmp,rehcnsivt
Plm-
As a rcsult ofthe
Cmpr&eosivePhnrwiew
1noocss, armmcadaio
vitlbonadoto&oCatry
Cmnissimcrs as to tho ned
toqdatolhoPlm.
ltcCmprAcodrcUa
rwicwuillbcm&rdodbya
CidzcaAdvisayCmmitbo
scloctdh mopcn,rrcll-
publicizodnanncr. Cornty
plonfu *afi vilf bo assignod
to assist lho Cmmittoo uhcn
noocssEy.
lntbocmtlhcrwiow
rmm:.cad*ios $rg&$tht
thcCmpttcosiwPln
shoildbcWdd a rwiso4
aod thls.rcqonrcaddioo ig
sdoFfiodbyeo(Mdd
Cody-PlmhgCmisOm, .
aoyrovisios shs[bo
dorclopcd cmsi*a vith tho
Ppbtic Participotio Goab,
Qiecdvc*PolHcgud.
Pqrams oflho ado@d
Cm@casfttoPtm.
1.1 Hanning sbfrvill cdinuo to moitc md
evatudo ltc cffizca inrolvtmcot Gfrrts
using antg,s' pcsoal omtac c dcr
rcasm$lomochmisms.
12 AD cvrMio of6o currtat mfu d
fnrblic hcorine/heaing nciciog shoild bo
initiatat Spcific.acar ofmcera hdu&
tho rcldmSb bcfura narrpqcrs tcd
-65sChendng dcasiii€sintho
Conty. Particulrmocm shdtld ccoicr m
ams to mocting datcs ud tgcodat
thmughout6oCotry.
13 PluningDermA pnoccArrcs rnd
applicatio meids will bc rwic\r.od to
cosrro ffi titizcar cm clcarly udcrstarl
&c pooccs od adrinigtratim d
Acportmcatat fimcilior. Ifnmsuy, a
ps.&ci shcld bc dcndqod that dcscribcs
PUD, $rbdivido udZoo 6e8e
nryuhd,E shitlrl rc$foGocots sud
adninisdvcprom.
Al assessmeat ofpr$lic aoocssibility of
planning materials shmld be om&rtod
regulsrly.
Suggcstod .tmgcs to Cotry odcs c
rqulatios witl bo formalty rprisorl'ud
evailablo fa usobylhoptbtb as quidrlyr
possn[q h afgm thit irrndcrrhdehbb
6opublio..
1.6 A rwisio of currtot ndchg rcqufo€nd
fr spocific tlpcs of applicrtimr ge
Disrid AmoodncaE, SLrP/CUPB. &.) vill
bc m&rctodtyPlro&g etd, SpociE
djoctivts oflhorwisios uc as &[bua:A. EosEolbdaqiaod1ropcrtyo*Er. mdmccraodcitizcosrcgirto .
amplo rychmity to psrticip@ in. lodusdoddmqB. Ensrcthat&epar6clfdmUy
Comtyresidcots oqsnrs 6lyin ec
4plicdioproe.
,EOASING
tr*sl'E8
Issucs ideatificd ttroghqtrtho Cmprchcosirc
Plaa Wclcshopc dir€ctly rdstod to borhg
includotobllwing:
o Afudability ofhosing ls nd curcq(ly
arirailablo in soc perB of&o Colnty, Tritt'
tho rucstcm pctio ofeo Cudy
accomting fu oc dlto afrdablo "nttf
Tho dceigq d.osity Ed sizo dqfidivirics
mu* bc scasftiru to covimrdrl
omshain8 and visral inpoctsuni$rob
cacb pr,ojocq
Ihc poliftratio of afidivisior has ba
daractcrired by tto 6llorvin& 6o uec of
ISD E/stcms mdindivi&nlvdtg dow
build@ md dcsig! mpocote rquled
by individnl dcrctrqcrs as oppooodto
Comtyd€cicim n*cr$
D.
E
1.4
l5
F.
LO
E 6iblt I Page 7
. Sp€cific issues relatod to housing pohcy are
nd universally applicable to the cotire
Cormty due to the diversity behryeea specific
suboreas ofthe regim.
GOAI^g
flouslng thot caai8 no nto?c thoa 30% of glw
aedbn laoru.
Daslgndcenotw.
Mb of houdng tyw wilhln a daclopaco b
enoarqd
Flrudtnsrsc lathcvahc {a honu by
placbg ded rcsu'lr/dotts onthcdlb
Thc chalbryc of 'tocP ofpaW sulryorl N
b oddrwd.
Dcslgndc Srovthtavonble ttaa adJacent b
comaaally llntb uc cncoarugcd.
Toprovile ollrypa othoulng thot cllrrl 6
amcat audfitutc rcrlfulcnu cqallablc houstttg
oplntunillq vhlch on dalgacd a provldc
sqIc, cl@rrt ratdctttlol sntatrcs tha orc
compatlblc*lth ond thol protcct lhe notuml
cnvbontru&
OBJECIIVES
2.1 To coounagcadoquatg.intqratod hosing
at a rcasmablo oostto rcsidcor trouglot
Gar6ddCqlntY.
22 To eosns cmstrrtcti@ of qualityhoriag by
cotinuod co&rment of 6o Comty's
hrildhg oda
23 'Resldcntial dcvelopmcot shoild be designod
and locdd to cosrc ompatibility wi6
cisting aad finre adjamt dcvelopmcat
The Canty Saild coorago ttc
dcvetqmeat of eaeqsl Gfficicat rlesiSF,
inclrdingsdaraoocsE 22
Rcidcodd dwolpeat shoild respoct tho
offnsl &aractcristics ofa partiailar sitc,
inctudng topqgranhy, ragaadm,. wrtcr
ftatrcq goolqgl md vinul rclatimships
wilh arrormding lod uses md vierrsheds.
2.6 Tho Comty shold coadinatc €trorts witr
thc Garfield Cornty Horing Anthority and
respective muicipalities to foctcr regimal
housing gols
POLtrCIF.SI:
2.1 The CoDty, throrgb 6e dcvclqmcot of
rqslstio$ $dl povi& ftr low aad
modcratc inomc hatsing t)1lcs ty Etlwing
fa mirrcd multi-ftmity and siaglefrnity
horhg in apprqrioc uras fuughot 6c
Ccntnty.
22 To inctudc ao osscsmcot oftho inpact of
preseat md finre subdivisios in bd
incorpcated aod uninoorpcatod pctior of
tho Conty &niag tho sttbdivisim rwicwprc.
23 lvlnjc apoess lta},s, toeoefapm ftfiucq
opco spaoc and othcr udcwlopod ludwill
bc uscd to separatoresidcatial uscs A,m
industrial md cmmcrcial ccot r&
2.4 Sotar aieatatio that allor: fubd passivr
and acirc dcsigp wi[ bc strmgly
eoounagod in thc dcsigDrcviewproccss aod
will nd bc rcsricbd'ty protcd'rc
covEoanEB.
2.5 Tho Gar6eld CqmtyZmingRcsdrlio will
ad&cgs tho issuo of potdir[y eof,i!fug
rrsrs witbin cacL.zming dcsignatio tha
allorrr fu rcsidcntial aad no-rcsidcotial
lend us.
PROGRAITXS:
TboComty, thrqr$ thcnso of its
Geognphic Infantio S!Ec6 Ed
ararilablc cnvirmmcotal sardica, sbdl
idcati$ arcas of partiailr caviroomcatalscnsitivitlrcvi$al aod$dl
develop ryocific pcrfcmooc standards to
en$rc high qnlity, tmropristc rcsidatirl
dwclqmcat in thc Comty. Arcas
LI
L4
25
E Olbtt { page E
identified as having sev€re cmstraintsto
dwelopaent shall remain undcvelqed-
2.3 Acmpcito map of *isting s$dirisios
and existlng hrilddt vill bc tlcvol@ md
updated regularty. Thcqdated mrys
strould be inchdd in staff ommcots to thc
Plaming Cmissio md Comty
Cmnissiocts fu infumati@al prpcca"
2.4 Comty shffrvill pursrc tho dcrclpcot of
wood hrning ryutafims as a pct of m
wcrall rwisio of &c n$divisio
rqutatms.
3.0 .TNANSPONTATION
ISST ES
Thc fo[oving issrcslttre idcotifio.l a"AgOo
CmprcUcosi'rc Pto.pocess:
o Evca following lhcproposod inporcmcats
oacnding Am Basalt to Aspcq SH t2 vill
ootinuc to opordc d rmaocoptablc lcvol$ ,
o Evso assumiqg.asigpificaot gti" iD
industrial and ommcrcial cmplqucat
oppctrmiEcs in GarficldConty; lrrgc
numbcrs of Cotntylcsidcoa will omthrrc
to bo emplryod W veUcy, firther afrecdng
&oqridc;
o Develqmcat in uninoorpaated reas of&o. Contyuitl mtinuc toplaoe dcmalrds m
rodnqn hitidty dcsiSpd to carry trafrc
rslatGd to agrioiltrat uses;
o Laodusodocisioshavcplaced
incmpotiblo tafrc mixcs (n Ermo
r@drvalE, dtto to tho appr,oval of pqflcas
placingreddcatial md
ommmiaUindustrial trafrc o tbc suc
transpam,o ocrirtcg rpithot appopriatc
mldgsd,m.
GOILST:
Loo* at opproprlotc nob oad colhcarpohtt
lorpubltc tanslnadon
A ba synaa acndcd bqond GrcM
Spdags should hc htlttdcd.
Non roll rd/ fus unbbdon lalhls
rcglor ottlc Cuay.
Coung shoaldwo*wlth Rtlle a daclop a
PatL-tt-Ritkficfby.
Pruvlde pablb tralaff sqvlcrs ro ser,tolr' yorlth
and rtnorilb.
Ensarc lhot lhc Couatt teqrofidon !,,t,il b
sotqladoael, aprryrfae$ dafgunO .
handle eisdag aadlunm WEc lclels d
lncluda opdonstotthc w otada aha
lheln lhc stnglc-oet@ aflMllz
OBIECITIIEI:
3.1 To. eocorrago tho dovctqmcot of a rqimal
publiotraasit Ertco thd rcspocts eo
ipteractio bchrtco cmcrging land uo
pattcrm aod trawl bdavir in 6o Vdlcy.
.32 Io.cooonage lbp. usc.of modg othctlha
3.3 Prqosod dcnrilopmcats will bc cvatued in
tcrns ofthc abitityofCqntyrm& to
adequatelry handlc thc traffic gcoerdod $lthcpopmt
3.4 Proposod dcvolopmcatr *Ut io"t rO. *oa
designs thdwifl rcduoc advrrss impoctso
adjaocat lmd uscs, rcAGct [strat
tqp%reDhy md minimizo &iving hazrds.
3.5 Prqosod dcvelopmca6 vill prwi& a
minirnunr nrubcr of acpcsg points o
thr$ih strG€as and hig[way ocridm.
.3.6 P.roposd concocial ud.inesEial
develqment will dirtct trafrc to rodur5e
capable ofhmdliag projccted traffc
Soctios.
3.7 Stroet elct€nsios will bcrsquircdto oer in
a logical Baoncr.
ROLICXES:
3.1 Statrwill fqter a oqcrstirc rclsdo$b
with citics, qrdics andtransitpovidcn in
addressing reimal trmspqtadm b$cs.
32 Dwetopmcnts are crrcoragodto interdc
bikqm)6, pcdcsriao circulatio pdcru
and transit ancnitics into proicct dcs'g..
E driblt I Fage 9
3.3 the project rwiew prooess will includc a
preliminary alxlesm€ot of the projecled
trafEc impact associsted lvith.slt
cmmcrcial and induslrial projeas ud
resi&atial projects greatcr fian 50 &rclting
Eits.
3.4 Gar6cld Cototy vi[ participoto and
ooopcrco with rcgioal.ann sccil,ido
tralrspaudmplaoning to casure a6 to
dl availablcmodcs fu Comtyrcaidcats.
3.5 Thc Camty wi[ pursua' throtgh thc uso of
Stxs lfiebulay ed Fderal fimding
mcdmisms' bcdarclopmcat.ofryi@d'
bicyclepoths withqn tho uso oftho
3.6 Derrclopmcat propocals will bo roquilGd to
mitigptc trsffc impacts o Couty rmds
fopcti@sl to.thc dcvclopmcatls
omtrihilio tothcc inpacts" Mtigatio
may inchrdcr hn nd bc linitd to thc
bfloriling;A. PbyslcatrmdwaYimprovemeats;B. IatcrscctimimPrweocots;C. Transit amcoitics;D. Signagorequiicocots;E" Altcmatiwtraficf,ovdcsiens;F. FfmdiagmochanisntoimPlcmcat
neoessarymitigtim-
Conty rod occasios uill bo
omhratodbasod m the foltoving
criuir:
B:dsting lood ttscs adjaceat to
&oPoj'ocqB. fbturclanduscsboscdolAo
Cmraco*ucPlanandtho
Z&bgnryuUfiog
D. Thcpccotiattrafrctobchandldby
ecpropcod crd€osio-
3.8 Stafirwicwofpropcodommcrcial
md in&rsilial dcvdopcot luiU.inch&
r dctcroinatim of tho pdcotial inpods
oftho projet m tho local transpatatim
s!/tilco" Spocifc isstcs tobo ad&cssd
inchdethc frllowiag:A. Trafrcgcocratedbasodm
Instihrtc of.Trsffc rnginain!
GIE)ratoci
B:ristingtraffic 6mts G
adjaocot rcdrra55;
Tho appropriatcoess of
popcodrelofofis
D. Thecmpatibilitywithcxisting. aodfirturetrafrcoothe
atrectedredwErs
PROGRAI}IS:
3.1 Thc Ccnty, with thc use of its CspitBl
Improvcmeots Progfam (CIP) ploning;
shall id€stify oristing rcd ooditios aad
shstl establish road standrrds amnoprioo er
thc prqocad scalo of darc,lopcot
32 A project rervisw frrm will bc dsvelopod to
allorvfrr a sitc speific, Gfficid&d
etrcdirrc.procodrnc.fc.asscssing 6c.impac
of cmmercisl industrirl aad rcsidcotisl
dcvelopmeat m tho rcgioal traosPatatilm
systcm.
3.3 Stafr, with thc ooopcratio oflhc Ptanaing
:Cmmissio, local andrqioal
govcrnmcatal agcacies aod aCitia
Adviscy C@nitoe, sbsll &rclop a
ContyWido Bicyclc Matlr Plaoto sssist in
lmg-rango plmniqg cftrt& Deve[opcrs
$all ansl)zc odsdng trail q/silcms thd
suld.be.liDkd with.pqc,od.trsils within
thcir dcvelopoco(s) md shall incapcatc
thcsc studicswiftin PUD md/c srbdivlsio
prqossls.
3.4 A Capitd tmputencaf Pnqgrtn, basGal o
laod.usc.pattcrns.popcod in thc
Cmprcheosivo Plao, shanld bc dclriolAod. ufiich idcatificsr,oArasn, ufricb pdcatielty
corld ocpcrieae signifimt tra6c incrcascs
in tho firhna mngadm nwyto
addrcss thesc inpacts shctld d$ bc
.summarizott
3.5 A tca (10) f,ear lvlasttr Plaa ofRmdntcy
Improveocotg based m mticipotcd finding
at tho lml, Statc aod Fodcral ls\rcfl sho{d
bc develqd in ooopaatim rvi& 6c Rad
aud kidgeDcparmd.
3.6 Plaoniog staf[ wie gui&ne fr,m thG
Pl,m'ng Cmmissio, will investigetc
mcthods of equitEbty asscssing prqeod
dwclqmcots frr neocssag, r@dutry
inpotmcots
3.? In aoopcradm with local gffiDncilts, tho
Colaado Ocpartneot of Tlaospctcio od
privatc transpctatio fovidcrs, GarEcld
Cornty fill.pnruo.tbc dadptot d.a
3.7
B.
c.
E filblt 1 Pagp 10
Couaty-widc Transit Program to includc &c
followhg cmpqrcatsi
A. Fixcd-bosed.ransit.servicciB. Parlc-aod-Ridchogrm:
C" Pdcotialrail scrvica
3.8 ,{ay dwelqmcot applicatim proposod
wi6in ao rrtu ryhclo of influcaoc
shdl GvaluatG thc'&asihiliry.of
altcrndiw modcs of tmryruion,
spocificalty nass"tramit
1.0 COTMERCALANDINDASTNAL
usEs
ISSITIES
Issrs ialdifiod tbrutghofi lho Cmprtbcasirr
Plan prooess inetrdcd the following:
o Cmmctcialdmrclpohuninoapaatcd
Garficld Cornty ha beco cLractcdzd ty
strip dcwlopmcot l\maioal eleocats
reldod to thcso patcstrs inchdc ft,ml
puking; litlorcgand fu Podcmian aoooss
pafr€rns md a wido vuiay ofnm-
mplcoeatrYuscs;
o Vchiculrdcocss'bascdoastriP
devclopmcat poficrn, has bc€o chafaccrizcd'
Uy multiplc &ivervays acccssiog naia
artcrials c hightu,,8. Ttesc acccss pdcrns
hinfu sooch amcsstqrcss.md cacoragc
mpahg v&iculr aod podcsilrim' mowoeats;
o Cmmqsialdcvclopmcd, in smo
instanocs, hos mrnod with lifilc rqard fu
omplcmcotary rigrsgc c dcsiSp, ufrich has
creatodvisual impacs o adjamt lmd uscs
ud aloinqir rtcaialsi
o Adoquatoinfra*nuncrcqrireoeaEau
oftco ndroquirod pria to prqioct approral
a arc simplynd anilablc at a porticulr
@
o Basodmthcnumbcrandsiaof
mmcrdal rczming in thc Fall of l99l and
ec Spring of 1992, orising zoning policics
ned to bc rwisod to r€flcct cbmgcs in tmd
uso pattcrns md Qfocivcs sinoc tto 19lt
aningnryUd,os.
GOAIS
Create an Economlc.Des,elopment frognn
Develop e qurllty scbool qrtcn frlttltr
retrln'rnd rthrct profcadmrb.
Enrurethet tnnrpontrdm modcl rnd n&
rr:cdtrecdy.fiGd h .wtt. ttc .ffry.Gcoodc
ccn&n
IXrect lDdu!ffid Ocery) develogmentr to itG
rlrportccDEr.
.fuur.q long-rcrm.commcr.dd end lnd@ld
dcvelopment et thc wcstGra rud tntcrclengp
prrtr of thc Conty end Cmmulll*
Commcrchb GrrGGld Coutywlll cDGoEnt!
thc nctelflou rnd cryonrton of urtnhot,
ylahlc rnd conpadblo cmmct&l
dcvelopment capbb of pnwtdlrye rvldo
vrrlety of goodr end rerdcct to rcrru ito
of tLc Couuty.
Industrla} Garfield ComtywltlcnGoungG .
thc dcvelopment.of a .dtverdtrcd hdu.t{.l
bese for the Cmnty nfrte.h rccogneoc ttc
bumra rcr(nrq nrturel rcemrccr rld
phyclcet locetlon-tomrr&ct celnbltrdcr of ttc
communltyr end nfrlch lhrthcr rccogEhG..d
eddrcrscr thc socrd end cnvlronmcntrl
lmpactr of.lndurtrhl lrc*
OB.TE|CTTVDTh
4.1 InwlvingtboEommicDcvdopoft
Program: It must bo rcgimal in its
approcb. Gcatc a celectivepocccs
involving land arca andpospcctirc
hrsinesscs. Geato a Plao with aVisio.
Sell andmartct thcPlao wfthrhc cad
rc$tt bcing jes and br( bosa Now
Digbt be a good timc to approech
baok$ Cosidcr ftsttck apprulal
pro6 and othcr innovatirc
apprcchcs to aommodato in&t!ilry.
4.2 Tocasrnotbatmmcrcialmd
industrial develpcat aro mpetiblc
with adjaocat land uscs and mitig$s
inpscts idcotifid &ring thc plm
revierrprom.
Eocourago thc lutio of in&srid
developmcnt in areas wtae visul
43
Exhiblt I Page ll
noiser air qality and infrastrufirc
impacts arero&rcsd.
4.4 Enccnrragothc locatim of commercial
derrelopneat in appropriate artas that
maximizcs cmvenieoce to Comty
residcot*
4.5 . Ensursthe.ommcrciel.derclopmcat.is
m&rcire to sa& aod e6cient trafrc
flow, reduccs rrchicular movemenB and
eoaoragps altcrnato transportad,m
modes and&ouse ofmass tansit
4.6 . Eosurcthd.6c.tlpg.sizcmd.soqod
in&rsnrial aod commercial dcvelopmcnt
us msiseot wi6 thc lmgtcrm lmd
usc oQiectives oftho Comty.
4.7 EosmothdZ@fognauUtms
addressing Cmmcrcial.and.Industrial. uscsrcflectthechandng landuse
psttesns md deoqgfaphics oflhc
Cdtnty and coonagethe firtler
divcrsificatim of tho Comtf s
momy.
4.t E "* a ommcrcial and industrhl
dorclqmeotpolicyth*is
eaviromeatally sorad aod acccptablc
to Contylesi@ts md policy makers
ROLtrCXES:
4.1 Cmmcroisl dcvelopmeot will bc
caooraged in reasuhcre odsdng
infrastructuro (rvaE and nastcwatcr
&cilities) uo 1n1tlV availabla
42 Conty zming"qutdos rya*ing
hersrhl ud oommercial dwelqmeot will
bc mpffilo ui& laad usc policics of
adjamt jurisdictios
a3 Lmdscrying aod soocohg will be re$ired
to ad&css ryocific vislsl inpacts.of
in&rsrhl ond mmcrcial dcvclopncne
4.4 Thcpnqfloctro,iewpoccss will include &c
idcotific*im and mitiptim of
hansportdio impacts rclstd to mmcrcial
md in&sEial dcvclopaacot
a.5 Zmiog rcguldios and a rwicwp,rooess will
bcdffilqcd md eofrrcodthat rcognizo
thcdiftrcas in sizc, soopg.and tlpoof
cmmercisl and industrial dcrrelopmeof A
hierarchical rwiew proccss will bc
.d€vd@ $,hich r€sp€cts tbc.uique.laod
use issues basod on the size and soopc ofthe
project The Camtywitl rcquirc inpo.t
mitigatim fa thesc projcctg whca
appropriatc.
4.6 Comcrcial aod lrr&$trial.prdccts.eodng
ooto SII &t will be required to providc
tra$it omeaitics (hts trnofrs, transit stes,
ctc") when pcrmancot traosit scrvioe
boomcs available. Tho amcaitics wilt bo
cocdinarod wi&.RFTA ed CDOT.
PROGRAI}ffh
Thc most practical implcmcotatim tool fu ttc
gmls, oQiediw md policics dcscribod abwo is
tho Comt/s ZqingRqulafiims. fhcprogrus
oulined.bclorv.addncss.thc. stcps.md.todniErcs
applicablo to this policy statcmcnt*
4.1 Zonlng Resoludo. A Rcvisod Zming
Rcsolutio fa StudyArca I will bc draftd
and adopted by Jaaury of 1996 to sd&tss
.tho claoging land usc and Gommic.pottcrDg
cmcrging in the Roaring Fclc Vdlcy. Thc
prftnary dirccim ofthe Rccohtrio will bG
basod m the following speific cri&ris:
A. Cmpodbilitywith lml
.politiaq
Cmpotfritity witb adjaocat usos aDd
finue landuscpancmsi
Desiga stoadar& th"t casrrofu
visual md envirumcatal inpacts of
.cmmcrcial aod.indu*rial
dcvelopmcot 66s 6inimirod;
Infrastructuro neods fc speific rs
aro cithor availablcacm bc
providcdto
.scrrc the.intGodGd ns:
Ite rcvisod Codc witl indu& a
rcfincmeot of speificuscs allorGd
within cach cmmcrcial ud
industrial zmfog dcsignatio &rt
cooorago rdcrly, .cop*iblc.od
attractiw dcvolqmeot within ttc
Coroty;
B.
c.
D.
Efilblt I Page t:
F. TherevisodCod€MU
€ocorage conm€rcial
developmcot.to locatc in.areas
cmvenient to ocisting md
firhnc resideotial areas to
€ootrragg shatcr v6icular
trips c altmnate trarsp6tad6
modcs.
The foloving poinB addrcss ryocific additios
est sholdba incltdd in lhcZoing
Besohilim:
Establi*rmenB ofDsdcns" the cmocpt of
Cmncrcial md In&*rial Disticts is
cmceptually introduced in Sectio II-
. Bsckgrcnnd Infuocim. Bricfty s*od, ee
eristiog zming applicablc to ommcrcial
and in&rstrial -o.i"g (C/G, C/I rodA/D is vrry
permissivu and givts lho CamtyBmd of
Cooissimcrs, Ptaoning Cmnissim.aod.safi
litle it my, discraioary orthaity rqarding
spocific propcotl usesr incltding thdr soopct
intcosity, cmpatibility r locatio of thcsc uscs.
'By defaing spocific disricts rolcedtothesc
Lbcq thc Cqmty wutld havc sdditical
arlhcity in tcrms of.thc.ttscs'tmcrmcG,
impstr and ompatibility of ommcrsiEl md
indutial uscs.
. Lurdscaoinc and Scrccoins Roenrlatims.
A landscaping aad smirig policy will bo
dcwlqd by Cdnty.stafr aad will.addrc thc
bUowing:
Spccific land usos thd will bc a&ciod
bytbcprWcottpolicy;
Plat pslctlo mltscnepringguidatincs to
bc cafred oosnstea$ W eG Coety;
A mcthod requiriqg the dcvelpd,
rwierw md inplcmcmrtio of
laodscaping c soocoing roqutcoeots"
Ttis shoild inchdo.6c requinanentsof
sr& a plo md &c t' i"g d
in*slldim rphming
Transoatatio ImM Assmcot Prom.
Apoocss willbo initiatcdto bcludc $aff
rcuiew ofpropw{ of.popcod.mmdeial.md
indusrrial dcvclopncat to dcterminc pdcotisl
inpEca ofthc prdoa o tho chractcristics of
thctranryctatio sJ/st@ Spccific isss tobc
sddr€ssGd includc thc bllowing:
A Traffic geoeratod based m Institro of
Traffic Fngl'.eering (ITE) ntcs;
B. Existingtrafrccqmtsoadjaceot
rudways;
C. Tte appropriatacss ofproposed aoocss
..poiDts;
D. Thc ompatibilityvilh qi*hg rnd fitnc
trafrc o ltc afbctodra&n;ts.
Parkinc Resulatios. Parking rqulatios fu
eeh dstlc.t wilt bc &nclqd thd inchr& m
rpdaic d$o.nrmbcr of.d.sect.p{Ung
requircd, l@ding and uloeding rqulatios,
int€rnal circulatio standards md ryocific
screaring u laodscaping rrqufocms
applicaUo to poddng frcilitic.
Sicn Requlati@. .Sign Codorogulatios will.bc
develqod fu ea& disEict ad&csshg eo sia
cofigrnatim, md loctio of sign. awiod
with ommcrcial aad in&strial uscs. fhcso.
regulatioos shoild be be uadcrmdablobythc
public and cafqqblcbyCotdy Stafr,
{2 Eoonomlc l)cvelopment PL!
An Eammic Denclpcat nogrm Saild bo
institrxd by GarEG[d Coutyto cacoragcod
prmote tho divcrsific*io of thc local ccmmy.
.Specific.actims.thst. should be instifirbd.as.pct
ofthis Gftrt inchdothc 6llwing:
, {c)
Identficatonof oes hrtleCrnotlra .
nrcst ordrctve toMtloml
contnwctal od UAsmal &yebts*
I&dffy twesoy ttfuuswe (nqtq,
w*w, trw8wtd'ton) tnw
tuessalt lo nryrt dewlopat bt
qpopiac@teaa,
Mloptutof.a
Idustrfall@natseblRadnst
PIaa Speific rcos thrt Saildbo
ad&cssod includom Gva&ratim ofl@l
resorrc bascs, ryocific dcnrcIqincot
pdcatid of rypqriAe srbsa+ m
attcos.to.build .msconrs.ryrding
spcific in&xtrics tobo maCod and
thc spocific jd drillc rcqufucd fu
appnqriate infucics.
(A)
(B)
B.
E Glblt I Page i3
(D)
(E)
Errowage tle ossistarce od $pprt
d local leding irctilrrbtu- Arcas of
oooperatim inclu& fte.nood.to fun
low-interest ventne capiAl pols to
compleaeot and extend the inveshcat
fimd$ grana and dhcr sqtrroes.
Develop a l,Iotcttng PIan Folloring
thc idcotificatim.of appopiatc
io&$rial and mmcrcial
geannftics, a log:term, mgofoE
nartaing plao shouldtc cstsblishd
inchrding brochurcs and omtari lists
Area Chambcr ofCmmerco aod City
statrpdcotially cmld.assist.in ltc
cfrrt
S.O. RECREATIONANI'OPFT{SPACE.
tr*ilrul
Prinary issues mooming rccreotio aod opca
qpoce ideotified drning thc Cmprehensivo Plm
proccss includd thc fo[oviog:'
o fhc rural natrne of Garfield Cqrnty, u/hich
has mainainod impcht visud qridors in
mundcrdqod
statc, is trmsitioing to mac intcasivc laod
uscs;
o Visral ccridcs offrticular impctane
neod to bc idcotifiGd aod policies t8il6d to
€sch6rida;
o Comtypolicyrqardingtrail syst€rirshqild
refloct rcgimal gcls andbc cosisteot and
omplcmeatry with othcr juridictioal
cftrts;
o Comtypolicicsnedtobedefinodrcgarding
specific direcim addrcssing rivcr and
publioland accs;
o ?niag,&rbdivisim andPuDrqulatios
mu$ bc cmsistcot wi& geocral Contyqco
spoco and rccreatimal objodivcs.
SOAL
Interconnod tdl systcn though thc otnty
witk connttilb
Efrcnd fi2il ryltcn along rirrcr conridor*
Obtain rishtl-ol-vay and adfucs prtvate lud
issrcs
LooL to thc conmunlrla b b tlc ccrrrattot
commualty acrfr.lg wllh Coanty guldonca
Thc Coantyvllltoo*vilh thc Conmufib u
dcvdop a Colorudo Rtvcr plufor tallt ond
Orcc1do*
Dacndnc thc oppropddc ldm tu rb Fe
Grwn&.
Garttcltt Couruy should ptovlde adcqtu
nseododol oporfrtnilta{o, Coanq.r.cslM,
crrsunc acccrc ro publb landt crinslgcnlvlu
BI"LI/IISfS pofida andpttwrc dW
teecdonol oplnnnlila ard hprrel ilfldorfut*
.OBJEGIWES:
. 5.1 trilsjr oonoems will bc noflsq ped&g. andamiUity.
52 'Conty/ Cmnruity intcractio"
.53 Encouagethclocatioof.activp
rccrcationsl oppctrnidca thc co
amiblo to Couoty resid6t$
5.3 Tho Comty-will srypat and cnoourago
thc crcation of qca spooq ltro4b tc
dcrrclqmcat and implemcotrtim of
zmi,& subdivisim aod Pt D reulxio
designod to $t8in and cnhane odsdng
QCa sparuscs"
5.4 Aosstopubliclmdswi[boogodod
.aad.maintainod.
55 Ra&ingaodfshingamwillbc
strmgly cnoorsgGd &ring ec
dcvelopmcat rwiewproe
5.6 Visud uridcs arcomsidcrod an
impctant phlsrcal attrihrtc of thc
Conty and.policies will rcfloct.ttc
ned to carcfully plan thcsc qras"
PIOLICIES:
5.1 Devclopments rh't propco dcositicr aborc
oc (l) drelling uuit pcr acrc and qocd 50
drclling units will borcquircd toprovido
adeqruto rocrcatianal oppatuitiss to rqrc
Ethiblt I Pege t4
the resideots oftheproject Alternatiycs fu
meeting this requiremeat \dll be d€fin€d in
the Subdivisim Rqgutatims.
52 Inpctaat visnsl ccridm will bG id€otifid
aod appropriate policics dsvclopd to
address thc retainmcat of qco Waoc arcag
that linlr ommunitics in the Comty.
53 If physical&.pmibler.nrbdivisios.md
Pt Ds will bc caoorragc to design qca
spacc ar€as to bome omtiguors wi&
oristing andprqoscd opca spaccs adjamt
to&eprojod
53 Cmsistcnt with.&c manrgerncot.QicCiw
o,f either tho Burcau ofland }lanagcocat c
the U.S. Fccst Scrvioe, derrelopnent Dodto
public lmds vill ba cocorragd hrt not
ryqrriro4 to provide public aooE s cascmcots
withof thc uso of.oodcrnnntim,proocsscE
5.4 ryith &o oooperatim ofrhc Divisio of
Witdli& dcndopracots propoeed h reas
noc to strcauts criqs wi& rafting c
fishing pdcothl Sqdd dodicatc easemeab
fu public amtothesc ceas"
5.5 In adcr to eomragc public acoess to rirrcrq
streoms aad p$lic land* thc Comty wi[ b;
rceptircto inacotivcq omsisteat with aD
overall fogn!tr sppsot ed by the'Bord of
Comty C@missimcrs, fc dcvclopmca8
that prqco prblio.arc.tortec
amcaitics.
PROGRA}III!
5.1 All arccoorrsgedtopnwidc
rccrcatimal ucnitics rvilhin.pqcd
dmlopmcots" The comtyshurld impco
iB rcquir€acot of a dodicatim ofpdl hod
a &ob licu ofascmtaiaed in &i
Snbdivisio nauUd,ms ia odcr to rcserve
ntmcicot prk laod to ammodatc &c
recreatioalnoods.of .tharesiden8.xfr ich-.thc
devclopmdwillhqrsa
52 Comty ptaoniag stafrwill idcntigi and mapimpcffi vi$al amidas in.6o.Counry
aad dadq seperato polides aud prognns
that cocunago tho rctcotio of opca smco
thst linln mmunitfos Dqlulqirs sfidl
dovolop and adop $trcicat stanaaras f:
A- Sctbackstm ridgedmessto
castrrc tfust sky-tining does nd
o@r;
B. Building envelopc designatims that
preserve visnl oaridrs; aud
C. Enviromeatallpsensitivo c
clnstcrcd dcvelqmcal
52 The Subdivisio ed Pt D rqulstios wi[
be refind to inchrdopolicicsthat cooorrago
omtiguors op€o spasuscsb Thcscpolfo:ics
will bo fumulstd st thc timo thc
Subdivisio R4rrldims rc rwisod. Alt
..dw.clopaddcnrilqmcoa.$dl.sostyu
oristing op€a spaces adjsmttofi*r
proposod developmcats, both putilic md
privltq and $all omtiguityorf
thcse spaoes witt prqosod opca ryaoito
bc.c@tainod in.tbc devclopmcnr -
5.3 PlasniEg $aq, i! ooAcradm wi& tto' Planning and Zoaing Cmnissim, vill,f*rq opios rcgarding ftasiblc md lqat
altcraatives to acquirc opca spae aod. rcscdi@alcascoeats. Basdm&o
.optioos idcotifid by StaE thc ptaaninc
. Cmmissio will makc a rocmmcodado to
thc Bord of Comty Cmmissioets
rcgarding pdcotisl altaaatirrcs.
S0(r) OPEN SPACE AI\D TRAIIS
Basd m public rukshops ud thc inidal crut
of&e Garfield Conty Opca Spooo md Tlails
Cmmittcg speific omocnr rqarding Oea
_S_ryfu aod Trails ptanning in fu norfie Fat
Vdlcyarc as follorrc:
o ThUthcreientioofthcnnal lsodsmoof
the Rmring Fort Vellcy is a critical tiro o
resideats aad visitas;
o Thc lcvcl of dcnlcl@cat in tho Va[cy tm
.1991 .to.l.995.hgsrcatltod.io eG
o,f histaicat ogricultral laod
at a rdc deoanding inmcdiatc ado o trcprt oftho Coloty;
r Wildlifchabiuisbcingnqgtivldy
inpactod ele b grurr,tt pcs$rq -
o Anypolicies regtrdiog opco spo6 aodEailg
Dust rcspGct thopopcrtydgh ofled
.olynq:r.in rtc hnty md num Dc tils m
E 6iblt I PagB 15
GOAL
5.1(A)
5AA)
s3(A)
the cmcepts ofjustcompensatim and
mutual b€ncfit fr laudomers, rcsidea8 and
visitos ofthe Rmring Fck Vallcy.
Wildlife Resouce Infamatio SJ *cn
(WRIS) wiU bc requirodto trope
mitigatimal tnealntns
during the srbmittal ofproposod
projcAs I\rlitigotimal mcasncs Sall
inchdcthc foilouing:r) Fcocingmddogrestsicios
cosistcntwith Doft
rcmmcnddios;b) Avoidancc ofcritical pctios
o,ftho propcrt5l, thlough tto
useoftuilding cnvrlqo. restictimsac.lug
devclopment omocptqc) coscrvatimcormffi.
Thc Berd of Conty Cmmlssioers
shall harctho arIhattyto appro\Ea
rqiect proposcd mitigatio-
53(A) Garficld Comf5r, thloryh thc uso ofthc
Opeo Spaoo aad Tfaib CmEi$cG, shsl
darclq a Cmprcheosivc Tbsils phn
for adopim by tho &rficld Cotry
Planning Cmlnissim and ThcBord of. ComtyCmmissimers. Thofrlwing
spocific eleoeots shslt bG a pct ofa
proposod plaaa) Agcacralpolicystatcacat
lnnrmarizing tho orsll' apgnoacU suppatcd bythe
Cotnt5/;b) Aprqeod dcsfign guidclinc
fE trEil dcvelopocat to sssfut
theContyaod6o
dcrrclopmcotmmunityh
intogr*ing trail dwclmcat
into thc lqg-mngc gro\ilt d
thcconty;c) Amcthodotogyfrridcod$hg
trail qridcs in tho Rmring
FortVallcyt
O A scrics offtmdingofliosO
casre that psopcrty mDGJs
aro adoquatcly mpcasdcd
fa taits ds{dopod o privCIo
prAGrtJ/;c) AC.;mprcheosircTrail!1ry,
cmsisilcatwith6o
mcthodolory adqtod to gui&
lmg-rmgo trail dcvclopa
in thc Rmring Fort Vallcy.
5.4(A) Thc Qpsa Spaoe udTlails Cmmitb
shall prescottho Garfiold Ccnnty
Planning Cmoissio aad thc
To cosrno thd aisting agriorltnal uses
arcnd advcrsdy iopoctd by
dcvelqmcat appnuted by Garfield
CqrDty;
To cosrc ftf wildli& hrbiht is a
ampocat of fre rwicw prorc aad
reosmablo nitigcio Erea$r'cs !r'c
impmod m prqioas 6C nqativcey
impsct critical habitrB
That 6e dcvelopmcot ofpassive and
activc trails ia fioComtyshfild bc
dctd@ in a ompreheasfirc fishio,
omsistcot wi6 ctrorb by adBGGotjuridictios;
agriculffial lmds and wildlifc habfiffi .
full r€*oct propcrty right and &c
mocpt ofjust cmpcasatio;
5.5(A) fhat iqng-rangeplmniog fu
aogisitim a dcdicatim ofqco specc
md trails shallnra poraltd to efusto
&vclop ftnding sorGEB fuju$
c@p€osdio.
BOIJCIES:
5;1(A) All prolocs ryovod adjsmtro
adsdng sgriculhral uscs shallbo
rcquird to Eitigstc ary adrrcrso
impaa* Thcscnitigatimal rncasrncs
shsll iuchde s@cc all ofthc
ft|lowing;(e) aperods0cbuftrhgof
buitdingGowlqe &m
cmBG propcrty bom&rics;(b) Thcusc ofopco spseto
provftb additioal Unlrinrg;(o) Dogrcsilictiosrlnclrdiug
limiting tho number of@t
aod rcquiring keana;"g prior
to isEranoo ofa Ccrtificdoof
Omryaocy.
5.4(A) That dl lmg-rmgc plmning fa tho
retcotim ofopca spaoe trail+
Dcrclqcrs p,qoeing prqiccts lodod
ia areos dcfinod as critical habitet bytho
ColcrdoDivisim of
5r(A)
E 6iblt iEsei6-
Boqrd of County C@missimers a
docrmcat srmmarizing optios fu
omparsating private prqpcrty o\rnc$r
fc aoquiring op€o qpace and trails,
cmsisteatrri& lmg-term plmning frr
aoquisitio apndoctio"
5.5(A) fficld Cototy, thrqgh the nsc ofthc
Opco Spooc and Tlails Co0ni6ee, SsU
dwelop a Comprchcasivc Roaring Fort
Vallery Qpcn Sp8oc Plan fc a@im ty
&c Garfidd CcntyPlmning
Cmmissim Dsd Boad of Cornty
Cmmissimcr& Thc fo[owiag spociEc
deocots Satl be a put ofa pqccd
plalr:
a) Agcacmlpolicysmcnm
stmmuizing thc orrerall
ryprocb nryportodbyec
Cdffitt;b) Apnopocodmcftodologyfu
idcafi&hglmdssitablctu
protoaim c aquisitio fu
opco sPaocprdcdio;c) Idcarifi*imofftcRaring,' PctY.allcy areas ryprqriata
fo acquisitim cpdoctim
msi*cotwith adotrd
policics.
6.0 AGNCALTANB
IS$T'ES
Isqrcs idcodfiod thrqtghotr ltc Cmprcheosivc
Plan proccss rclabdto agriculttrsl uses ioohrdc
thofo[ovine;
Ihc rollwcr dsgricultural hd into mcp
intcosouscs i3 socol€rating in theComt5T;
Itrstaical ryrieftral laods aro also theo
lm& vhi& prcscat ttc least developmcot
ooosilraints (goolqgy, topqgrryby, urtct
availabitityl
As thc rud ucas of&o Conty cotinuc to
dcrdq, thc aood'to casu'c mpotibilityb6m thcserrcs md adircagriorlaral
ledswilltuEod{rf
A growing nrmbcr of traditioal agricultrral
lmds m bo oqcctod to intcosity into
agrictrthrat htsincsscs, ueich uay aftct
Couty land usc policics dcsignod &r
taditioal raacbin& grazing and cnop
prodldim-
GOALS|
Considcr lhc usc olTranslcr of Dcvelopncat
Xrgrrs
Jolalormcn and ranchen togdhcc to dewtq
a hnd usc ploalor ogrlcalnrc.
Constdq land frus8 ond ansctrdon
To cnsttrc tha dsttng ogrtatfrml us crlc
allowod to'confrnac la opwdon and
a nryotlbllily &slar ue oddiwdfuru
polcar*lctc.
OB.IECTTVES:
6.1 Eosrro thc cmpatibility ofdcwlpa
prqocalswidl *f18 fums mdrocbcs.
62 En$rcfhd activc agricuhral ulFs a!
htrered frm higfucr-inteosity adjamt uscr.
6.3 Devclopmcats a4iaccatto agricirlhnrlus
sborld bc rwicurod in s manncr 6at allorw
fc flcxibility in rcsolving mpotilrility
mflict3wilh adjamtrs"
PIOLICIES:
6.1 Agricultral land will bc prUoOd fim
infringcocot and assciatod iopo.ts of
highcr-inteosity.lmd uscs lhlorgfu thc
establishmcat ofhftr arcas bdrycca thc
agricultrrsl usc aod thc proposod 1noi!.t'
62 Dcasitics g€dcr lhan thc undcrlying 'dringwill bo dlsoonagod iftho prqoood
dcvelopmcnt wqild a&temcfiy aec eo
adjaccot agricultral qcratios.
6.3 Ctust€rod dcvelopmeat vill bc strmgly
coooragod in arcas that preoot pdcotid
inmpotib[ous"
PROGIRAIIIS:
6.1 TbcZmiag Rcsoluim, $fidivisio od
PIID R4ulatioos will bo ancodod to rcquirc
a spccifically dGfincd buftr zmc bcura
agricrrltrral lands andmqoin&asouc.s. Ir
additim, tbe updatcd Rcgulatios will
addres dqsity bcuscs to coqrrage tto
rtlcntim of opor spooo.
W
62
6.3
6A
Adopt an apprqriateRisittoFum md
Ran& Policv.
Dwelop, distrihtc rndusca Rrnal Livinq
[Iaodbo*:
DcignatG hfiGr zmcs of at l€a$ 300 fG€t
benm fumed/ranched lands md
resid€otial lG ulcss a los$r amamt can'bo
deomsratcd as apractical hrftr.
6.5 Rcquiro dcvelopcrs topcrfrtn a specific
analyds ofpdcofisl inpo.ts to agricuhml
laods and uscs, and to prqose oitigdim
lnOA$rrGS.
6.6 RGquirG dsrctqcrstacvrr@cd to &aft a
specific mitig$im plra to omsidcr and to
adopt Practiccs u'hi6 eli-inrto thc ryread
ofnoriors urccds, naioain odgdng
inigatio ditcbes (wi& ryocificprovisios to
8s$re u,& is nd wastod c ilqpodod) ud
inpco propctio*c oosts of maintcnmcc
&Carcbaoctythc
dcvelqer/dorrcdqmcat thisplan shall bc
requircil ao lCcr lhen d thc srbdivisio
*ags. Thisplan sbs[rGqufoG ipp*/ap,ovrl
bytho afrcdeq cgrariao landown€(s).
6.7 Enoorragpfic darclqct c dorclopmcat to
purchaso a omscrvrtio Gascnt, at fiir
vzluq fim tho adjaocat agriorltrnal intcr,esg
who can usothis buftr zmofrr agriqrlhralpnpe uftca inftasihlc b maiffiin r 3(X)
fodbuffc fr@ ESriculhral land and uscs.
6.t RoquirG lhd ell Fhd Pls cr4r a plat noto
thd ndifics proryoctivr ld orncrs.^h t
Chr6cldCqmtyhls adodcd a Ricfitto
Frm and Rmd Polisv. md thc oqics of
this policy aro arailablc frm local land title
ompeoics,
6.9 Roquirctho idcotificatio and thomappiag
of fcdcrsl hsd grEziag pcrnits @LM aod/r
rrsPs).
7.0 VATENANI' SEYE&. SERWCES
ISSI'ES
Issues ifutifrcd etring lhc C@pr€hensiyc Plmpro6 rdatGd bw and sswtr scrvis ars
as follo*t:
Thcproliferatio of LS.D.S. m indivi&ral
sites shold be carefulty rericurcd in tctms
of soil cmstraints and drainagc
characteristics of cach sita
Ifigb dcosity deudopcag dcfinod as
aceoding mo (l)dwellingrmitpc oc (l)
acra, shoildbe locatcd in r,casnhcrc
ccatral swage trcahcat froililics rc cilhcr
orreatlyavailablc, c fcasiHo in ttc firEG.
GOALS'
Provtdc adcgutc sc*rlcascl s@.fii.
schools otd othcr publlc screr6.
To cnwrc thc prwlston or tct$
dcpcndoWe, N cficdtc and cidnnffily
oand sqct ondvoa scrfrcalot ncv
dctclopncnl
OBJEEIIYE&
t
7.1 I Devetqmcatinarcaswithonodsdng,: mtral w&andswrscrvicouiUbc,. rcqufucd toprovidcadoqrccaod s.S. provisiosfcthescscrviocsbcfiro
i"dGdapporal I
72 Devclopuart locatd a{iamtto
muicipeliticc c smitrtio disils
with availablc capacity in thcfo ocntral
rvCcr/scwtr $6tcos will bc strmgly
cocoragod to tio into thcsc syffit"
Proleas pqcing the usc of Indivi&Dl
Scwagc Diryml $rstclns (tS.D,&)''
wi[ bo rcgircd to assc tto sie rqebilitytomodofuo
siEtcos pria torqaoct ryp8orlt
Devetopmcot witl bc roquircd m
mitig$o thc impoC ofthc propccd
prqioCo Gtristinguaicr aud scwlf
E/StGm$
(ffictd Corntyuill stumgp
discomgc the paoUnrtim ofpitrc
natcr aod sc\rcr s!,tilGm&
Eghdcotity tlcrn{opocot, dGGnGd er
cxccedhg oc (l) durclliag .qit pcr oo(l) acrq will bc rcquirGd to arscss to
pdcotial of omccting hto cxistiqgqtral urc rDdsulr lbdlitics.
73
7.4
7.5
7.6
Exhlblt I Pago 18
7.1
72
7.3
PIOLICXES:
All dcvelopmcnt propcals in rural
areas withortorising oentral water
and/or ssrcr sJrst€ms witl berequircd to
show that legnl, adequdc, dependablc
aod covirmmeotalty somdnater and
sslvagp dispsal frcilities cmbc
providod bcforc projcct approtml
Whcnclogcal lqal and ocmmic
ecdcosim of scrvioc lincs &m u
existing r+atcr anda ssryagc sldco
co ooqr, thc Comty wi[ rcquirc
dovclqpncatadjomttocwi6ina'
reasoablc dfutan&,to eatcr into&o
appropriste agrecmcats to r*ivE
scrvioa Tho hrdca ofproofrcgarding
logrcal lqal and ocmmic oostaints
witt bc m tho darclopcr.
Tho Ooutywill rcquiro developcrs
propcing LS.D.S. to providc dao tha
dcm@strate to the Comty th* thc
propccd sitG car scommodstc lhcsc
sfacms pia topqiec amrot/al
Whcro LS.D.S. is not feasiblq Chrficld
Comtywill rcquire a sellagc disposal
slstcm approvod by thc Statc of
Col6ado.
Itrgh dcnsity dcvelopmcat is msidcrod
rrbm in nahrc and roryircs appropriate
scrvioa ltrogh thc Zming
R€sohtrio, Garfictd Cqmty vill
strogly cooragc higb dcosity
dcvelopmcat to locane in arcas ufrcrc
those scrviocs arc avuilabla
PROGRAIESE
7.1 AEghGnmdrvatcr/Sqticsyc@
Cmstaint ltfap, basod o prwiansty
olloaod b&nical dstr, will bc
dsvclopGd md appliod in ftcpr{cct
revicw proes to easrc tbst rvatcr and
$,rstc\mtcf systcms arc designod in a
saft, cfiectiverDsoncr. Fc aneas ofthe
Cornty lhat hanc nd boca mappd it
shall bcincumbcnt upo thc &vclopcr
to crelustG&G $rb,$r&oc ooditios
and ftcir ability fu a@tut*y trcuhg
rrussrmtcr th* worlld 6e gcocratcd by. thoprqioct
72 Modificatims totho Zming Resohtio
will indudc an asscssmcat oflhc
relationship bct\rrcn oristing catral
nater and scw€r Enfiems and fifirre
zone districtq partiorlrty as it rclatcs to
dcosity definitims.
7.3 In ueas idcotified as having ssv'lsro
msminB to lte use of LS-D.S., thc
&velqcr shdl in$8ll eithcr etraliad
lr"stc\rutcr treatncot hcilitics, c
andher caginecred'lcsi8in approved by
the Statc, 6 shdl leavcrhis lmd
rndcvelopod.
7.4 . A Uratcr Cmstraints lrrap, bescd m tto
oolloctim of geologicdm, willbo
devclqcd md appliod to&cpr{oct
reviow proccss to cosurcthd potablc
watcr Entcms m dcsignod in ahcallty
and sa&mmncr and thst u adogao
&O IUTAML ENYINONMENT
.IsSIIrlI
Is$cs relatod to ths nafrnal coviromcat
idcntifiod .during thc Cmprchcnsivr Plm
proocsscs arcas fflous:
r To[rism isanintqralcmpocatofttc
ccmmy ofGarficld Cormty. Ttcrcfuc, it
is essential that the planning proccss rcspG.i
thc natural coviromcat th* brings rcsirhts
and visitms to thc Contyi
o Theocistinglv{aaagcocntDistridf,Iry, .
dcsigncd to addrcss arcas ofminc,
modcratq aad sevcre cnvinnmcotal
cmstraint* docs nd allow fu spotific
hazards to bG idcotificd od mftiged;
o Protectio ofair aduntcr qustity$oild bo
m cssatial mpmcot ofto
Cmprdensirc Plao and $$ccqrrcot
ameodmeats to the Zming Rcsolrtrio ad
Subdivisio Rcglatios;
Dwelopmcat shqild respoct thc natual
omt(xrrl and &ainagepsttcrns o cact
individual rqiGctsiq
Impctant visual sridcs shqildba
idcotifiGd aad ompanio dcsign guidclincs
rqarding sigpage s€bsd$ htftr areas snd
7.4
7.5
E.l
Iandscaping shqrld bc fcmally adoped aod
enforced by &e ContY.
GOALSI
Thc cnhanemcnt olrlvct conldon
Thc rcclsmdion of tand afia eador
Prutcdon ol votrrrrhc4. orltd fuoQlol*
Conml &alnagc thal lnPoc8 tlc
Cottllrunttb
Ga{tcld Coarty vtll cncoarugc a land t*
pat era lhat rccognka lhc cnvltonncnlel
scnstttvlty of thc lanL doa nd owtbunlcntb
physfcd copacily olthe land and l, ln thc W
,n crcfi of thc heabh, saldy andwcfon of
GarfleldWy.
OBJDIETWES:
Tho Comfyofcdrfidd res€rvcs tho
right to dcay a.prqfuct besed m ssvet!
covirumcnal o@straints ufiich
eodaagcr public health, saft*y c
welfue,
proposod pojccts uill bo requirod to
reoognizc the phfical featrres o,fthe
land md dcsigp prqiocB in a mmncr
thd b cmpatiblc with the phpical
covinmmcat
Garfidd Conty will casne that natrral
Aahags eprotcctcd frm altcratio"
Rivu firmts andriparim afeas uo
ftagib ompmm of thc ec5ntcm
md theso arcas rcquirc car€fuI rwicw in
thoplaoning prorc.
Dovelopmcat poposals will boroquircd'
to ad&Gss soil omstsaints rmiqrroto6o
prqeodsita
Carfidd Curuty will eoslnc 6et
nafirrat smicmd ccologicat rcsqnsss
md cttrcal wildli& habirc aro
pdGctcd.
Dordopmcot will bo cooorraged in
ucas with thc least covhmmcaal
m"stmintsh
ROLICIES:
8.1 Ctarfield Contyshsll dismnags md
rescrvc thc rigfut to dcay dct dq,od in
arcas idcntified as having sevcrrc
eaviromcatal omsaaints srh as active
lmdslide, dcbris floqr' uostBUG
slopeg bcthoc& sliceq majr mud0otvs'
radioactiw tailingp, slqcs ovtr Zi
pcr,mt, riparim areas and urctlmds ud
projcds prAosGd u,llhh thc f(X) frcr
floodplsin
82 GarfioldCorntysbaUdisoorage
developmcot propmls that rcquira
orccssivr rregdtio remwal, qn md.
fill reas c ottcr physical modificatios
thstwill result in visual it4ndatio c
prblio sa&tycmocrns.
83 Neral &ahasppdcrDswlllbo
prcscnrcd so tho cumulgtirc imfct d
public and pirratc hnd uso acivitics
will ad carrc st6m draioagp aod
. floodrvstcrpattcmstoqooodtbc
capacity dnanral a constnrctod
drainegc$ralrc, c to srtfoct other arrcas' toanincreasodpotcatidfadamagc
ducto f,oodio& crcio c
scdimeotatio c reqrlt in pollutio to
strcams, rivcrs c dhcrnaturalbodicc of
rvdcr.
8.4 Thc Comty will raquko dcvolopmcat
with rivcr frmt88p to addrcss thc isslc
thr$gh phyticat dcsilgp in a nry'that
will prcocttagilc vu€ttm& aod sctoic
rcsorroes andprotoct flo@laios tm
caerochmcat
t.5 Thc Comtywi[ disourage
dcvolopncat in arcas uhcrc scrrer,c soil
mstraints cunot bc adoquaidy
Eitigetod-
8.6 fficfd Cdtotywi[ trdocr critical
witdlifthabitatn#bymmd
fodcralty prcocd thrcdcood c
cndangcnod ryocics. Dcttclqma
within thcsc dcsignatios&et cmdbc
desigpc{ co$rudod and om&rcod sri
asto havc aminimum sdvrrs.inpott
rryo such habitst athcscwildlib
speica, Sdl bc AsconagcA howvtr,
it is the inteot ofthis polisy, thet no
82
8.3
8.4
r.5
8.7
E[raHt1F"gleru
prirate landorrner lce the abilityto
dcyelq his/her laod withos frir
cmpcnsatim as a result of orraing
significant wildtife habitar
E.7. GarfictdContywitlroErirc
dwelqmcot on laa& having modcrab
c minc eavirmmcutal cmstraiots to
mitigCe Phf,sical problcos sp6 as
mina rod6[s, l7 to 24 pcrmt slqcq
minc mrdfloun, potrotiat srbcidcaoq
high u,aficr tableg slow peroldio,
radimaivusoils mda urcirc md
opensiwsoflls.
PROGRAI}IS:
l. GarfieldCuntywilloglacofiiosto
intqrato aa cavirmmeatal rcfiorv .
ploocss eat is scasitivpto dimiring
lq,r{s oflstral osnaints thrurghot
tho Comty. Pcrfamaace staodar&
$dild bc darGlAd rtat eonrrc
aAcqudc mifigld,m of idcotifid.mstrairc.
IATAML NESOANCB WTNACNON
ISTI'ES
Primary iswcs omocruing naarral nesnrce
Grdractim id€otifid &ring 6c Copr*cod'rc
Plan proes iacludc thc follwing:
Tho relatioship bcturcco prsyiqsty
approted niniag qertios ud rcsidcatial
dorrclqmoat has rc$ltcd in visul noisc
aad trafrc oopatibility issrry
Thc prqaty righE of trivste prqerty
o$,ncrB must bc balaned witt thc rights of
mincral lcsscc$
Ihc County mrr$ bo proeCiw in reacting to
mrka omditios thst will impact tnc rcrU,
loc*io and scalc ofminqal Gfitnacti@
wilhin thoCarutg
Garfdd Coutyhas signifimt mincral
rcscnrocs thd has, ud will omtinuc to havo,
a omsidcraHc inpaC o &c eommic
hcalrh ofthc CalDty.
GartiewCounty rccognlzs thA anda
Colorado law, thc surlacc aad mlactzl t rtrirrllc
have certaln legal ilghfr andprbll4a,
llcludlng the rlght to cfltad aad d*cbp th*
ln er&. I\rtumorypdvote propaty
ovncnt olso hsvc ccaoln lqol rtthtr .d
pfivllega, tncludtng thc rtgW to hevc thc
mlncrol qtau daclopettn e rcosoaeilc
naanctandto havc advcncland tubry
nt rged.
OBIECTIVETT:
9.1 The Cumtywill roErirc adoq"rro
mitigatim to addrcss impaCs ofnincral
offi.ti@ o ptiran
Iropcrty wDGrB, vihqrt rn&c h[|dco
m tho l€sl rights ofmincrat lcsss.
92 ThcContythrorghthcimplcucotatim
offrc Coprcheositu plm, Zmhg ed
Specid UsePermit policics, will -
sddrc$E funrc oopanibility iEqrcs u,ith
currcat mini.g Acrdimg
93 TheComtywillcosrrothcmincal
ortracim activitics will Dot adrrct$ty
aftct thc nattrral covirmmcat,
. including air gality, v& qrnlity,
wildlife hsbitst c impctant-visd
rrcs(x$oqs.
PIOLICXES:
GarEold Cornty, totho odeot lcgdty
pmible, wi[ r€quilo ddG'I,'-to
to addrcssthc inpocts of
Einccat octractim o adjaocat
landwncrs. Thcso mcasrcs mry
includc 6c fo[owing:
1! I-sodscrphgmdscraingfD. Modifcatioofphasingr
arcatobcEinoeC. Roodnnayinproveocats atrd
signa$tD. Sa&andcfficicatsooEsg
rqG;B. Drainsgoinpro\rGmatsto
prdoct srr&€aod
grundwatcr.
Gar6dd County, in ecdbatim vilL
relcnant spccid district$ aultoritics rod
mmicipaliticg will rcquiro rrrt
dcnclopcrs dcncrgt c mincrel
9.1
GOAL
92
Exhtblt I Paso 2{
ccfiacti@ projects finance the
cm.structim and qcration of any prblic
improremeots urtidt nov a in thc
ftturc, will be required by their
projccts
Clarfield Cornty will require dwelqers
of Eincral ocractim projeas to
fticipdc iD md mtihrtc to rho
fuodhg of fto Comt5ls moitcing d
&c dcmogrsphis &'ngcs 0d'
socioeommic inpacts associatod witt
srce prqiects" Tho Bord ofcornty
Cmnissiocrs sill msccc &o
applicability ofthis policy o a casot5p
casebasi&
Dtlfi, es md fimcs shoildbo
oootainod within thc orractim siic
gcoceating nd cmissios and Sorld
not n€ativGty aftct aoy srnomding
lmdu*,
:.
Any prqosal rqrding nin€ll
G'dractim rhd @nd Eitigab advcGo
impocts may bo dcoied basod o a
finding of inoopatibility, fu tho
6llowingreams:
A- Adversetyafiediagthc
fuirabilig of thc immodito
ncigbborhood a tho cotirc
mmunity;
B. Impairing thc stahilitlrc vahro
of existing aajemt paqertcs;
C. a6tcrso[amcUngthoqualiay
oflift ofodsring adjamt
reddcooeq
D. Showinga lac& ofqualityc
finctiu lnopcratioal
plmiqg and/c dedg$
8.. Goatingap*ilicdogEc
nuisme to surnomding aficas;F. Altcriqgthebosiccbaractcrof
ad&ocot land uscs rtho eatirc
mmtmity.
PROGNA!il$
9.1 ThcffiddContyToningRcsolutim
will bo lcrvisod to rcfloct 6o C6lsr
QicCirtc and Policics rqardhg
riEsqrecrdrrctio. It is strggcctGd
o$divisim 0anlqcrc 6tah dl
s$$rfice dghts (BiDGral riibt)
ass@i8tod lvith thc laod pqposod fu
nrbdivisim prir b finrl Plat approtlal
All mineral leases aad owncrls ofreoad
ofthe plattod propcrty shall bc
ideotified m the Final Ple
PlsDning $afi, with thc coopaatim d
1[9 plrnnirrg Cmmls*,m, will rwisc
the Spocial Use Permit proocss to
rc,flect thc neod to cosrc cmpetibility
of mincral odra.tim activitics wi&
adjamt lmdrscs.
ARBAN ANEA OT INrI,'Um{CE
92
9.3
to0
9.4
9.5
trlslrEs
himary issucs id€otifiGd &ring eo
C@pr€hcnsirc Plm poccss cm bc smmariad
asfrllws:
o Comtyland use dcisios, pertiorlrtytheo
imndiardy adjamt to nunidpel
bqndaricshare, h smccascs, crGatrd
ompatibility prohlcos;
Dtcto thcvidc lraricty oflrscs ByIUgh
wilhinthc Count/s qs6 Zoning'
Rcsohnio, plenning Ofr hrs no
discretimary review arxhcity to prcr/at
inmp*ibility sinratis.r with u adjac6
munioipality.
GOAIS:
An Inlcrgovcrnmcntol Agcctttcnt bapa
Gay'leld Coanty aid thcyorloxis Conmunfr&l,.
Sharc Eoad olCotnty Coauldfuna* ud
Plaaatng Comnlslon nembcrx rtcr lrlrarew CutuylConntnltlt borlnrillrb,.
Allwfor ammcnE on bqncA b
cyaalf utfstdcthcorurus
qhcn oflntbcw.
Pronatc doclopmcnt h ond omurd &conmunltla.
@anQfothabq / ttre ltffitusgctj| prrn
qryrovels.
Eold Planning Cotnmlfun ac-dry btbv6reuadottkcCu*y@.
Ercurc thot dcvclopneat and oyadl lud tu
pollcta oeurtng ln tlc Cung tlAffi efrA
E o|btt 7 pagen
o munlctpaltf a?c.corrq,odble vlth thc clJsdts' unlng andfuturu laad u* obJecfrta of thc
approprlate nanlctpaltty.
OBIBCIIYES:
l0.l Prreseruatio ofairpgt rea fu
ommcrcial md industsial sitcs.
IOA Rctain nral charactc otsidc d
mmuitylinits.
103 Enoryhlaadareawithinmmrmity
limits to aemmodoe grmrtt er tie
noC 2().yus wiftqt .uccotims.
lOJ entytosdusopdicicswillbc
omsisteat wi& local laod usc policics
md QioCiws.
10.5 Devetropmcat eat roqdt€s urtosarie will bo camnagodto locatGin
arcos rryh6 thes garis ur avaihbla
10.6 DarelqmeatinantltonArcaof
Infhrcu,e will barc stnect petterns that
arc ompdiblo with tho a&ctod
muicfuelity.
BOLICIFII:
l0.l Cmpr€hcasircPlandqgandZping
Rcsolutior,crisior, ZmcDi*ict -
Amcadmcots aod itrdividual moiocts
wi&in dcfinGdtlbsaArcas & -
Inftrcnog will bo omsistd wie bcd
municipal lud uso pdirics
to2
transpctatim characteristics and inpr*frm the atrectcd jurisdictim-
The effectod mrmicipality, pria to
adoptim witl bc allou,cd torwicrytho
Cmpreheasirc Plan, L@d Usc Ivhos
and nr@ucat Zoning ncsotrtrios'eid
Snbdivisim rcilisius
t02
Prqioe.proposod adjamt to local
muicipolitics tbd r€Eriro uft@
scrvis uillbo caoonqgcdto mcx
into trc afocodnrisdidh"
103 Develqncat will bo opoclod to dcsigD
a stsect sSctem ttt uill moct 6caedd nunicipalit5rs strlcct standards
fu costructim and right-oGwry wide"
IROGRA}I&
l0.l In oopcratio witL local municipalitica,
tho_m@casivc taad uso mat' will
dcfino ro [frtaa ArGa oflnfluoae fu
cadbjurfudicdo Thodcfiairiowillbc
besod m top%raphy, growft pfficrn,
E fiibtt I Fege Zg
EXHIBIT 2
Preliminary plan Map
EXHIB|T 2
E 6lbit 2 pagp I
---
=
Eliilo uilclllarooE D!ca. m & tmrl'& D ErD l ml GE E@a
oPEr rloN' utllco@ EilE roc!3 tlr[t EouEa clr anll.uulom EG,;r c8E IrE t&ttm clt aIf llElc ErElErctac urt rErd[tr Gtrt an[l @ [t DC nrE Plrtr rt?(ErooEErr rEaf mrilo ollltr. nl[|.l Io [trulqrIrm+tr rla DGrttD 6' rDl.m !0 llr tot tuta ltrD td rDtrtl mplDDtr rEE trrt tuDa lttt rrrG t[! t tt r{c, crIC trrr, IT!tl^tl. Dot rctt
'l|D
tat tD 0' lDllrll !o oElllY rorD uTOEI-O-IIL
Oodqr. ond C'ry Alcolt
WIII NffiTt lAfrE ag, g?l
- Jltu lua ',!fiE{?J tt@rgrwfrulDrgl
. .E!TW UW ag'
6rca* ..L rtg srryrr zur
O.N e
,.@.e
06r.e
dO@ e
O.tC o.
,ott,,.8 e
uru DBCnImd
121.100 AcE PMEa
I tlrct og'Ilnd .ttuat6d tr th. st1r'as1/a lnd th. 511/lsEl/r o! S.ctlon 1 6nd
th. Nll/lNtf/a o! g.ctlon:g l]I h fomshtP 6 South, unq.91 xdsl o! thG 6'i
P.f,. brr.trg d.acrlbEd.s t91trov!:
8.ElhrlD!_!t the gjuLhrast Corne! gf,!!ld s€ctld {, th€nce N 00'90100"-t
ri5.r6 ti.i .ioag !h. x..t Itn. oi ratd sectlm , nd tlon, thd tsast.Ely ilne of
!h!! plrc.l ol l;trd dngcllbcd tn &lc 5?0 at Prge 266 ln the Offlco 6f th.
G.r!1.]6Gu^ty Clart sd n.coideti lh.nc. N 75'13'10" ff 101.09 l.!t, thsnco X
lr'0t'al. r 115,59 ft.t, lhonco [ 5!'l?'08" I t??.?S f€.t to tht c.nt.r ot tb.
Cololrcit RlY.r, S.trc. tlohg th. o.nt.r o, !!1d rlv.r N 2l'{3'15'E 339.10
t..!, tb.nc. ( 23'13'20'E 310.00 t!.!, lh.noe { 35'08'15'e 119.25 f..t;
th6hea r 12'56,13" E 499,62 !.ct, th.dc! ll 65'0lt{?t E .(O{.lO l.et) lhoco N
1t'15tr2. Z !03.50 t..r, thenc. N 8l'15'20' B 281.r9 f€ot, .b.nc! I 8l'!3'38"
D 2tn{r !..ll.th.nc. I s!'O2rl?i I 266.82 t..tr tlterc6 3 6A'a2'11' E 180.81
!!.! to.th. t.!'t lln. o! tho Erunatr g$dtvlllon Sxugtton No 1, th.nc. .fong
t.ld llelli llha ed dEalting th. c.ht.r ol llld coLgtrdo R!vr! I 00'50'51" E
520,60'frat to thc Noitborrt 6rnGt o! ths! iDlcat d.lcibrd ln 8@k 52? at ?a!e
,13 r, iac.ptlon xo, 293601, th.nc. rlonl hatsd.ry of tatd Parc.l s
10'22r1on x 328;6:l !o.1, th.nc. s 08'10r13'8 {30.97 lcot to !h. southlrly
Rtght ot sY o! countv &ia No. 335r tlence afqnq laid etghE ol w'v N ?9'02'15"
E' l,1O !..t, th.nca .3ont e *.te to the tlght s1U, €n .rc langti o, f,03-61
-
lhty Edifi,
Logtot,s -::
lw
I
**'
lJ[ UNB SEttsACrS
IETH-
lMIGIBm rd E
10'
i.
PTBBINCtlt Gt-atrrl
El8EIle tPLtS
oINEBr/APPLICAI{T:
XIPIDS DEVIDONB|I OONPOSIIION,
BrPDS 0!t lEt oouraaDo E0MIIBS
fggrcl,lllol{, Goc & EtrtoD, l lt st J.
Eltoog'IlE f. IBIPIK'E Dil'}ILllllltrolt, oD Solat-stxr8
ENGINEEB:
IOUIIIAIIT CNO88 EltGIIIEtsNTT{q IrC
CbEb Erfr, PB
E8O ll Gmad Arouc
Gflolood SDElEa!, O0 0l60f
Ph! 9171r.9a5.66,i4 l.r: yrlr.9l6.6660
STIRVEYOR:
Alcb.s.l Eolr.q PLg
,l7!rlt Gotnlr Xo.d gt4
$lt, o0 61068P!/Ls! t O#7C.W+1
UINEAAL I,EAIIES on
OPEN SPACE TRACT
SOT'TB OF CR 385:
EIIL BlEBErr OOnpOnAlIONl(m tSth 8tsa.t
Dcatc, O0 tG@-1e08
IIINBRAL OtrNEBS:Go. B. Eltott & Irrt J. Elt.a
2I@ T. IBTPIEOE DIIgErfrrrfirlt, oo E0120-E@E
Itedord LradIlchltr. lgt
!.at, . lrdLu! o! 38r.99 fe6t. s acrtral angln o( l{'36'{8", . chord b€lring ol
3 ?t':r"21'E, r dord !€hgth ol 296.05 lrct, th.nc. d 56'20156'E 201'92 ftot,
thonc. ilono a cud. !o the leli ulth !n.!c lohgth ot 6?.52 !..!, a ltdfut o!
191.32 !.or; I cslrll.&le o! 20'13'15", a chotd b..rlirg o! s 66'2?'la'E, !
chold'teEth o! 67.1, f.ea, th€oc. dagartlng laid Righ! ot x.y S ll'{7'53'I
fO0,(8 l.at, th.nc. a 12"52136'E ?36.29 (r.t, 6.trc. alot ! cu!!. to thc
llcht rSth e.!c liagth of 236'18 f..tr a lrdlut o! 518.39 l.al, r cont..I
.nila of za'lr,3l', . chod boarlng ol 5 00'31'lri E, I ch6!d l.ngth of 231.65
t.air tba;ao 3 1l'19'S0" W' 1{1.56 l.o!, lh.trc. g 09'30rO!. o 3}0,17 loati A.W
t[.nc€ tr L1'30'oo. r 1150.00 ta.!, thoDc. N a9'30r00* H 195.00 t..t, (h.nc.3 O 7f
?o'ls,oo. r !?d.oo t..U thercr 3 z!'oo'ooi ts {ll'95 les!, tionc. 3 00'1{'(2'
E 6{.1,{ i..t, th.tr€ I 8g'20'00i r 1308.90 (..i, to the ?o1nl ot BcAlnoln,
contaxllhg l21.lg0 lo!.r,
THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
1,/4
PI.ANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
sEC. 4, SE 1,/4 iSEC. 5 & NE 1/4 SEC.
T65, R91W OF,THE 6TH P.M.
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
I
?ll m. ololl-llnLl& Ol[ltr EIECIc 0!l lPltrlc Elltrlo MtI-Or-Ill
c lo?lf
totlf &tott trSLI ulllrcr|I. rt!f,t tllmI,r (rprs-Punlc)
D.U,r/.6 DEmy
tCe reP.u. Dll$l
LlDlo . tr
r PlltrtrIlD Ul
EZIEy -B
UEgF(-22
ZEIE
CrgE?frtr]EE2ZE,*
EEEg
OI
Egi
EEE
E==Z
HE=t EUJEEEetrF
a
'lH
OATE
09/26/06
scl|r
Not to Scole
EtGil8
c. HAL-E
Dm ilt
PrePlonl O4Lots
s 423
gGT
1
EXHIBIT 3
New Castle Memo. of
Understanding
EXHIBIT 3
MBrronnxDUM or UxoBRSTANDING
,/l Ttrrs lvlruonerouu oF UNDERsTAI.IDINc, made *is / 5rr alry of
| - .2005, by and among the TowN or Nrw CAsnE, a municipal
corporation with its principal offrce at 450 West lvlain Street, New Castle, Colorado
81647 (hereinafter the "Town"), TI{E RAnIDS DrvrropNrNT ConponenoN, and TI{r
Repnps ON rm Coloneoo HomowNsRs AssocrenoN (the *HOA'), both Colorado
corporations having its principal office and place of business at 2102 West Arapahoe
Drive, Littleton, Colorado 80 1 20-3008 (hereinafter collectively "Rapids").
WmEAs, Rapids owns certain real property situate in the Coun$ of Garfiel4
Colorado, consisting of approximately ninety-seven (97) acres, as well as the right to
acquire an adjoining parcel consisting of approximately twenty-four (24) acres; and
Wurnres, in September of 1997, Garfield County approved Rapids' plat for a
subdivision comprised of thirty-three (33) single family residential lots to be known as
The Rapids on the Colorado (hereinafter the "Project'), which plat is recorded in the
office of the Clerk and Recorder of Crarfield County, Colorado as Reception No. 513353;
and
WI#REAS, in accordance with such approval, Rapids completed the public
improvements for the contemplated suMivision, including roads, water, natural gas,
telephone, electricity, fire protection and drainage, with sewer sgrvice to be provided by
individual sewer disposal systems; and
IVHEREAs, Rapids now desires to file an application for a PUD with Garfield
Coun$ in order to replat the Project property together with the adjoining parcel
consisting of approximately twenty-four (24) acres, or a total of one hundred turcnt5rone
(121) acres, as a PUD comprised of one hundred twenty-one (121) single family
residential units; and
WIGREIs, in order to obtain the approval of Garfield County for a PUD, the
subdivision must be serviced by a central waste water treatment system; and
Wrsnms, Rapids has prepared and submitted to the Garfield Coun$ Board of
County Commissioners (hereinafter the 'BOCC") a site application dated December,
2003 for such a central waste water treafinent service facility (hereinafrer the "Facility")
for the Project pursuant to CRS $25-8-502, et seq.; and
Exhlbtt 3 Pagp 2
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Toum of New Castle,
The Rapids Developme,nt Corporation and
The Rapids onthe Colorado Homeowners Association
Page2
WffiEAs, the site application for the Facility approval was sent to the Toum in
its capacity as a referral agency with a sewer system within tfree (3) miles ofthe Project;
and
WTEREAS, the Town expressed concerns about the site application density as
originally submitted; and
WHEREAS, Rapids amended its application to the BOCC by amendment dated
March 29,2004;and
WrmEns, the Project is within the Town's three (3) mile planning area as set
forth in C.RS. $31-12-105; and
WffineAs, Rapids seeks the cooperation of the Town in its site application to the
Colorado Deparhent of Health and Environrnent (hereinafter tlre *CDPIIE") and a
recornmendation &om the Town to the BOCC that ttrcy recommend to the CDPHE that
the application be approved; and
WHEnEes, the prties desire to enter into this Memorandun of Understanding to
reflect certain agreements and understandings among them.
Now, THrnrronr, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideratioru the partie hereto agree
as follows:
l. Subject to the provisions of this llemorandum of Understanding the
Town $all conselt to and rwommend to the BOCC thst it recommend appoval of the
sirc apflic*ion for thc Facility.
2. Rapids agrees that the proposal to be zubmitted to Garfield Cormty for the
replatting of its entire one hundred twenty4ne (121) acre parcel as refened to above as a
PUD stnll nd outain more than one hundred twenty-orrc (121) single family residential
units, and uses for trails, open spacq roads, ponds, utility easements, water storage tar*s,
$aste water treatment facility, pipelines, irrigation ditches, lires and facilities, water
wells, recreational facilities, community facilities and other uses approved by the HOA
from time to time, and sball conform substantially to the sketch plan map afrachcd hereto
as Exhibit "A" The Town agrees that many elements of such proposed PUD, including
clustering dedication of open spa@, preserving the hillside as open space and the like
Neu, Castle-Rapids Agreement 4. I l.2005.FinalN.C..doc
&hlbit 3 pege 3
Memorandum of Understanding
by and arnong Town ofNew Castle,
The Rapids Developmelrt Corporation and
The Rapids on the Cotorado Homeowners Association
Page 3
are consistent with its Comprehensive Plan, although not in strict compliance with such
Plan as to density. The Town supports the PUD because of its substantial compliance
wittr its Comprehensive Plan as noted above, the provision for a public trail with river
access, and the provision of a waste wa[er treatnent facility with proposed use as
provided herein;provided, however. that any such support is contingent upon compliance
by Rapids with the provisions of this paragraph an4 further, so long as the PUD proposal
is consistent with the following conditions:
& Rapids specifically agrees that it shall, as generally depicted on Exhibit A
attached hereto, dedicate to public use a defined trail (the *Trail"), not less than
four access points ("Access Points") between the Trail and a fifteen- foot wide
river trail ('River Trail") to and along the water line of the Colorado River, as it
may seasionalty fluotuate, for fishing and other non-commercial and non-hurting
recreational purposes druing a time period commencing thirty (30) minutes before
smrise and ending thirty (30) minutes after sunseg and shall provide nine (9)
public parking spaces within the Project for such purposes. Maintenance and
repair of the Trail, Access Trail, River Trail and the public parking area shall be
the responsibility of the HOA.
It is specifically agreed that the Trail shall be located a minimum
of ten (10) feet from the rear lot lines of the residential lots in the Project.
Fences, not higher than five (5) feet, may be constnrcted by thc HOA and/or lot
owners along the lot lines abutting the Trail. Fences not in excess of four (4) feet
in height may be constructed outside individual lot lineS within the dedicated
open space to protect landscape features, provided that such fences in the opcit
space do not unreasonably impede public access. The Trail shall be not less than
six (6) feet wide, shall be initially composed of four (4) inch compacted road
base, and may be modified by the HOA to provide a hardened strrface to
encourage use by the elderly and those who are confined to a wheelchair-
The foregoing Trail, ,Fithi"g Trail and Access Points shall be
shown on the final ptat with appropriate plat notes.
b. As port of the PUD approval, Rapids specifically agrees that the opbn
space tract ('Open Space Tract") located south of County Road 335 and west of
Cormry Road 312 shall remain as open space in perpetuity. The Town and Rapids
acknowledge that the following uses strall be allowed on the open space tract:
New CastleRapids Agreenrcnt 4. I l.2005,FinalN.C.RwA.doc
Elfilbtt 3 Prgo /f
Me,morandum of Undersanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Page 4
Leases, ag€ements, reservatioil;, @sements and rights of ulay of
record.
Additional water well(s) and water storage facilities and
equipment for Rapids, including access, utilities and W-3262
underground water augmentation plan pipeline and associated
contols and equip,rrent
Existing access roads
Nothing herein shall be deemed to affect the rigbfis of third porties who have
easements or reserved rights concerning the open space tract.
The foregoing Open Spce Tract shall be shown on the final plat with appropriate
plat notes.
The parties agree that all road impact fm in cxcess of those alrcady
expended by Rapids shall" unless otherwise dir@ted by the BOCC, be applied to
additional improvements to Countr Road 335. It is furttrer agreed that Rapids
shall propose to the BOCC that the balance of the Road Impaot Fees to be paid by
Rapids shall be utilized for improvements to CR 335 based upon
recommendations to be made joinfly by engineers representing &e Rapids, the
Town and Garfield County.
The parties specificatly acknowledge that Rapids has previously expended the
sum of One Hundred Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Six Dollars ($118,206.00)
as impact fees, prior to adjustment for inflation, for the 33 approved existing lots,
which ftnds were used to reconstnrct and pave a one-half mile section of CR 335
adjarent to The Rapids on the Colorado suMivisiort and that ao traffic impact
fees shall be due for 33 ofthe proposed l2I lots.
d" The parties acknowledge'that the waste water treahent facility site
provided within the Project is sufficient in size to accommodale wastewater
treatne,rt for approximately one hmdred (100) acres of privately owned land
a{iaoent to the Project and Apple Tree Mobile Home Park tuiy expansion of the
proposed Facility is dependent upon approval of an application to expand the
facility by the Colorado Deparfirent of Public Health and Environment based
upon various factors, including but not limited to comments from adjacent
New CasteRapids fureement 4. I l.2OO5.FinalN.C.-doc
(t)
Q)
(3)
E Giblt 3 Page 5
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town ofNew Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation urd
The Rapids on the Colorado llomeowners Association
Page 5
mturicipalities, residents and the recommendation by the Board of County
Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado. In the event such an cxpansion is
approved by the State of Colorado, a service conmct to provide waste water
treatrrent to properties located south of the Colorado River and otrtside the' Project would require such properties proposed to be served to provide:
(l) Liability insurance for potential damages caused by oftite polluunts
introduced into the plant systern
(2) An agreement to hold Rapids hannless for all costs or liability
resulting from damages associated with facilities or services for waste
water treatment originating from properties not owned or acquired by
Rapids.
(3) cash paymene shall be made in advance for all expansion expenses to
be incurred by Rapids, its successors or assigrn, including but not
limited to engineering and legal fces, administrative @sts, utility
modifications, modificatioru to the existing plant necrssitated by the
expansion, and expenses of any kind or nature associatcd with the
expansion It is specifically acknowledged that the experuies of
expansion to provide service to properties outside ttrc Project shall
include any and all ovemrns by subcontractors or consultants;
(4) An agreement that provides that maintenancq, repair and rcplacement
of all collector lines, lateral lines and associated facilities within
adjacrnt properties or within Apple Tree Mobile Home Pa* shall be
the sole responsibilrty of the adjacent property owners or of Apple
Tree Mobile Home Parlg unless otherwise agreed by Rapids in the
service contracq
(5) Tap fees and services c,harges for wastewater treatment provided to
properties outside tre Project (Apple Tree, Mountain Shadows and
adjacent properties) shall be at rates accepable to both parties.
Notrrithstanding anything contained herein to the contrar)/, no connection
to the Facility by any third party shall be permitted without the written
consent of the Town" provided however, that such consent shall not be
urueasonably withheld if the proposed land use is consistent with the
New CasleRapids fureernert 4. I l.2005.FhalN.C..doc
Exhiblt 3 Page 6
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town ofNew Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Page 6
Comprehensive Plan for the Town.
4. Noue. All notices required or appropriate wtderthis Agreement shall be
in writing and shall be hand delivered or sent by certified mail, rctrm receip rqucsted,
postage prepai4 to the addresses of the parties herein set forth. AII notices so given shall
be considered effective seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States Mail
with the proper address as set forth below. Either party by notice so given may change
the address to wtrich future notices shall be sent.
Notice to the Tourn:Town ofNewCastle
450 West }t[ain Street
New Castlg Colorado 81647
The Rapids Development Corporation
2102 West Arapahoe Drive
Littteton, Colorado 80 120-3008
Notice to Rapids:
Notice to the HOA: The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners
Assn.
2102 West Arapahoe Drive
Littleton, Colorado 80120-3008
5. Fnul Acnrmrrm.rr. This Agreement supersedes and controts alt prior
written and oral agreements and representations of the parties, and is the total integrated
agreement among the prties.
6. MopmceuoNs. This Agreement shall not be amended or modifie4
except by subsequent written agreement of the parties.
7. hrrenpnrranoN. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with
the law of the State of Colorado.
8. TEnuuverroN. If the Rapids has not obtained final approval from
Garfield County of the replatting of the proposed one hundred twenty-one (l2l) acres
parcel into at least 121 residential lots as a PUD within two (2) years from the date of this
Memorandtrm of Understanding then this Memorandum of Undersanding shall
terminate and its provisions be rendered null and void
New Castlc-Rapids Agreemcnt 4. I l.2005.FinalN.C..doc
E 6lbit 3 Page Z
Memorandtrm of Understanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Developurent Corporation and
The Rapids onthe Colorado Homeowners Association
PageT
IN Wrrunss WTEREoF, the parties hereto bave executed this
Memorandum of Understanding on the day and year first above written.
.$iilri-r{;2 TowN oFNEw Cesur
Repos ON THE CoLoRADo
:El sEdrI- !fi=n i cou:'irY Jt -:, 1 vvvr'r ' r''-i, *\'n * -.j * S**i,,i;ia;i;iJ
'rffi,1rrr\
-i,,fi"orrl,*ro"t\I:*-'--- "!-i (ri'1 ,-i ir''-
TIfi
Gene R. Hilton, President
New Castlo-Rapids fureernemt 4. I l.2005.FinalN.C..doc
Efitbit3 Page I
,fl --
ffiE'i Iryl{'Eiti'$IufffilE
3
Sg
**H H
Ess H
EEiE
rF
!l'ii'iiitiilii ilr
-'l'li ;'E
t
i
The RAPIDS on the @LORADO
Planned Unlt [hvelopment
SKETCH PLAN
M(xlmruN cRo66
ENONEEruTrc" INCddffiEdttA-dbhliarOfr
re.g*
Erhibit 3 page g
EXHIBIT
Rapids on the Colorado
Existing PIat & BOCC
Resolution 96-70
Resolution 97-26
EXHIBIT
Elfiibit 4 page 2
Qtr
4919,822 8-996 P-665 LOltTlLgsB O4:O3P
I.TILDRED N.SMRF GARFIELD ffiJNTY CLERK
PGl OF7
AI{D PMHDER
Rrc
o.oo
l0T
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield ,
fu a n:gular meoting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County,
CblbradO, lidd'in tlie Commissioners Meedng Roonr" Gar6eH'eomty'eourthurse; in'Glcnwood'Springs on'
the l4th of October A.D. 1996 - there were present:
Merien I Smith Commissioner Chairman
CommissionerArnold I- Maellev
. Elmer (Buckey) Arbaney . Commissioner
f)on f)eFord County Attorney
Mildretl Alsdorf . Clerk of the Board
Chrrc-L f)acr:hanec Coun$ Administrator
when the following proceedingq among others were had and done. to-wit:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-70
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLA}I FOR THE
RAPIDS ON THE COLOR/DO SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, GENE HILTOI{/RAPIDS ON THE COIORADO, L.L.C., tns 6lcd an applicEtion with
theBoard ofC.oumy Commissioners of Garfield Countv for approval of a-Preliminary Plan for Fqpids on the
Colorado Subdivision;
WHEREAS, the Garfield County Planning Commission reviewed the Rapids on the Colorado
application and recommended approval to the Board of County Commissioner$
WHEREAS, hsed on the material submittcd by the applioant, the recommendation of thePlanning
Commission and the corrunents ofthe @rfield County Planning Department this Board finds as follows:
That proper publication and public notice urd posting were provided as required by law for
thc hearing bcforc the Planning Comrnission and Board of County Commissioners.
That the hearings before the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners were
octensive and completg that all pertinent faots, matters and issres were srbmitted and that
all interested parties were hehrd at the hearing.
)
)ss
)
l.
A-g
-Exhibit4 Page 3
4s9822 8-996 P-666 LO/L7/L996 O4:O3P PG 2 OF 7
3. That the proposed subdivision of land is in general complianoe with the recommendations set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated area of the County.
4. That the proposed subdivision of land conforms to the Garfield County Zoning Resolution.
5. That all data" surveys, analyses, studies, plans and designs as are required by the State of
Colorado and Garfield Cornty have been zubmitted and, in addition, have been found to meet
all requirements ofthe Garfield County Subdivision Regulations.
6. That the Garfietd County Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary
Plan.
7. That for the above-stated and other reasons, the proposed subdivision is in tho bcst interest
of the healttu safegr, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of
Garfield County.
8. That, based on the dynamic nature of this particular proposd, thc following modifications to
Planning Commission recommendation are required:
a) Deletion of plat note 9a;
b) Dcletion of condition of approval #22;
c) Deletion of condition of approval #26;
d) Deletion of condition of approval #29;
e) Addition of certain other conditions of approval, as contained herein.
9. That no response was received by the Colorado Department ofHealth regarding the proposed
method ofwaste water treatment. within the time altotted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Preliminary Plan of the Rapids on the Colorado
SuMivision" for the following described unincorporated area of Garfield County be approve{.with the
following conditions:
l. That all representations of the applicant, either within the application or stated at the public
hearings before the Planning Commission shall be considered conditions of approval, unless
stated otherwise by the Planning Commission.
2. Thc Homoowneds Association shal! be incorporated in accordance with Colorado Revised
Statute requirements.
3. The applicant shall prepare and submit a Subdivision Improvements Agreement addressing
all on-site improvements, prior to the submittal of a final plat.
4. The applicants shall submit improvcrnent plans for all roads, bridges, utilities, fire protectiorl
improvements, signage and drainage structttres prior to the submittal of the 6nal plat.
Exhiblt 4 Page 4
4ssa22 8-996 P-66? LO/L7|L*}B 04:03P PG 3 OF 7
8.
9.
a)'
That all utilities shall be placed underground and any propane tanks shall be placed
underground or otherwise obstructed from view.
That dl cut slopes created during construction stnll be revegetated with native grasses, shrubs
and trees with adequate weed oontrol. All revegetation shall be in accordance with the
applicanfs rwegetation plan. Revegetation and landscaping shall be included in the
Subdivision Improvements Agreement. tn addition, adequate security shall remain in place
for a period of two (2) years to guarantee the survival of all plantings.
That the applicant shall demonstrate that procedures are established for the maintenance of
all roadways and bridgeq including $mw removal, ttuough the Homeowneds Association.
That the applicant shall pay $200, per lot, ($6,600 total) in School Impact Fees prior to the
approval of the Final Plat.
That the following plat notes shaU be included on the Final Plat:
'The-minirnum.def-ensible spaae distanoe shall.be.30.feet on.level-terraiq.plus appropriate
modificationto recognizethe increased rate of fire spread at sloped sites. The rnethodolory
described in "Determining Safety Zone Dimensions, Wildfire Safety Guidbliires for Rural-
Homeovmers,n (Colorado State Forest Service) shall be used to determine defensiblc space
requirements for the required defensible space within building envelopes in areas oroeeding
ftve (5) perccnt grade.n
"Prior to issr.rance of a building permit, the owner of each tot shalt prepare and zubmit a soils
and foundation report, an I.S.D.S. design, and a grading and drainage plan prepared and
certified by a professional engineer. All improvernents shall be constructed in accordance
with such measureq which strall be a condition of the building permit.n
uThat all lot owners shall comply with the provisions under which the weU permits for the
subdivision were approved. Except for Lot I and Lot 19, no lot shall iniga{e more than
10,000 squarefeet of land with water from the central, domestic system, and all waste water
disposal systems shall have non-€vaporative leach fields."
"[Jpon adopion of road impact fees by the Board of County Commissionerq the lots created
by this exemption shaU be subject to paying the fees, paid at time of building permit
application, paid by the building permit applicanq unless said fees have becn paid by the
dbvelbper. Tliere shall'be creditgiven tb the developerfurtfte'monetary'amount'spcnton'
providing the required acoeleration and deceleration lanes.'
"lndividuat lot owners dratl be responsible for control of noxious weeds and thc Homeowneds
Association shall control noxious weeds on all Open Space/Parkland portions.'
Thst all well permits be issued prior to final ptat, that sufEcient water provided through the
approved augmentation plan, water rights associated with the wells, together with well
5.
6.
7.
b)
c)
d)
e)
10.
Exhibit 4 Page 5
499822 B-996 P-668 10/1711996 O4:O3P PG 4 OF'7
permits, all physical components ofthe water system and shares from the Moore Ditctt, if any,
strall be tranSerrod by ttre dweloper to a homeowncrls association which shall have the power
and the duty to enforce compliance by lot owners with the terms and conditions of the
augmentation plan. Appropriate Protective Covenants shall further require compliance wirh
the terms and conditibns of'the augmentation plan, the met€ring of waterusagsarthe'
individual lot and provisions for dripirrigation.
That the applicants shatl prepare and submit protective covenants. articles of incorporation
and other HomeowneCs Association documents including byJaws will be submitted for
review by the County Attorney prior to the approval of the Final Plat.
No rczubdivision or Accessory Dwelting Units shall be approved for this subdivision that
would impinge upon or diminish the services provided for the lots approved hcrein.
That dl roadways shall be constnlctd in accordance with the design standards in efflect at the
time ofsrbmittal oftheFinal Plat. Wrth the orception oflot l, in no event sirall an individual
driveway have direct access to County Road 335.
That the static water level in Rapids Well #2 be monitored and if the static water level falls
below 24 feet, a 2rl-hour pump test and appropriate recharge rate calctrlations be performed,
with all results reportd to the Planning Dcpartmcnt. through final plat.
That adequarc easerrcnts for wells, waterlines and other attendant facilities and utilities shall
be provided on the Final Plat.
Thc applicant shatl provide road signage in accordance with the Uniform Manual of Traffic
Control. These should be included in the Subdivision Improvements Agreement.
Prior to the approval of the Final Plat. the applicant slull submit approved plans (by Colorado
Department of Health) for the proposed community water.system.
That access and utility casements to the proposed water tank shall be shown on the final plat
and dedicared to the Homeowner's Association, that the applicant shall receive the necessary
p€nnit from County Road and Bridge regarding the crossing of CR 335 with the water/utility
line(s) and in no case shall the access road to the water tank be in excess of 14% grade.
A finalized'b,oundary line adjusmeff occurbrfirrcFirial'plat appmval'for the'remaining'land'
not being included in this subdivisign.
Open heanh. solid fuel fireplaces shall not be allowed within the subdivision. One (l) new,
solid.fuel' burning- stove as defined. in-e.R.S, ?;5-7401\ et seq. and. the. reguluions
promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be
allowd an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances.
ll.
t2.
13.
t4.
15.
16.
t7.
18.
l9:
20.
Exhibit 4 PagB 6
499822 8-996 P-669 1olt7l1990 0+:0gp pC S oF 7
All provisiors contained in the Burning Mountains Fire Protection District's letter dated July
10, 1996, shall be adhered to and made part of the Final Plat.
All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and shall be directed inward,
towards the interior ofthe s"rbdivisiorl orcept that provisions may be made to allow for safety
lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries.
That the recording fees for the Final Plat and all associated documents be paid to the County
Clerk and Recorder prior to the srgning of the Final Plat by the Board of County
Comnrissioncrs and a copy of the receipt be provided to the Planning Department.
That the Final Plat srbmittal include a copy of a computer disk of the plat data. formatted for
use on the County Assessor's CAD system.
Protective covenants shall speci$ that only one (l) dog is allowcd, per lot.
Protestive covenants shall specify there be no incineration of trash.
That specific building envelopes for the individual sewage disposal systems be designated
away Eom the watercourses of Garfield Creek and the Colorado Nver for dl lots identified
within the respective floodplains.
That dl building envelopes affected by the floodplains of Crarfield Creek and the Colorado
River shall be elevatod above the lcrrcl of the 100-year floodplain, as a requirement of the
Subdivision Improvements Agreement
The developer shall provide specific designs and plans for the development and use of the
open space lan( for review by the Planning Department, as a requirement of the find plat
urbmittal.
Dwelopment within the areas identified within the flood fringe of the Colorado River and/or
Crarfield Creek shall be required toadhere to the conditioni of approval for th6 Hoodplain
Special Use Permit, conditionally approved on October 7,1996.
That uccelematiunartrdweleration'lanes'and'school'bus turnoutsshall-bo provided-at both-
intersections with County Road 335. and shall be developed as part of the Subdivision
Improvements Agreement.
The derrdoper shall takeprudent *eps to control dus generation and migntion from the site,
for the duration of development of the site.
All weight restrictions on Cobrrty'roads shall be observed by the developer and all
subcontractors.
21.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
3t:
32.
33.
Exhibit 4Pagel
499822 8-996 P-670 hO/LT/1996 O4:03P E 6 OF 7
Dated 15is 17thd1y of October
ATTEST:
aD. l9e6_.
GARFIELD COIJNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COLORADO
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Eluer (Buckev) Arbaney
-
Aye
Aye
Aye
Chairman
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
County Clerk and ex-<ifrcio Clerk of the noard of County
Commissioners in and for thc County and State aforesaid do her&y certi$ that the annexed and foregoing
Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Prooeeding of the Board of County Commissioners for
said Garfield County, now in my offioe.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hurd and affixed the seal of said County, at
Glernvood Springr this _ day of A.D. l9_.
County Clerk and ex-offcio Cterk of the Board of County Commissioners
).
)ss
)
ACriUit 4 Page 8
499A22 B-9SG P-671 to/t?/1998 O4:O3p E 7 OF T
I.aCAL DESCP.TPTTONA tract ol land situated in the Strfr/4 ol SecLion 4 and the SEt/4 ot
Seetion 5, TorzsNp 6 South, Eange 9! tfest ol the 6lh P.A. described
as tolto*s:
Begianine at thc Southrest Corner ot said Scctioc 4: thencc N 0e 50'
OA-' f lSA.tO leet aloaz the ffest tine ol said Section 4 and atoag the
Easte:ly llnc of thal paTcat of laad desct'lbed ia Eook 570 al Page 266
ln the- Ollice of the darticld Cowtt Clc*. add Rccorde:: thence N 75c
43'tE'f 1U.89 teet: thonce N tio 08'41'r 1t5.59 tec!: tbeace N
53e 47' 08' tr 1n.75 lcet to the cealcr of tbe Colorado Rieer: tlence
alonz tbc ceoter of said rlrcr N 23o 43' ,5'E 339.10 lcct: thenca N
zse2e' 20' E ?to.oo leet: thcaee N 35o 08' t5' E 419.25 lcc!: thence
N 12s 56' t3'E 499.62 leet; thencc N 65o 0l' 17'E 404.40 lcec:
thcnce N 7le 35' t2' E 50{i.50 lcct; theoce N 84a t5' 20' E 294.99
lect; thcnce S 8!c 33' 38' E Z*t.41 feeE theace S 50o O?' 17' E
266.82 tcet: thence S 68e 42'lt'E 476.7O leet: tbceca dcpariieg the
ccnter of said Coto:ado Rivcr S Oe 29' 34' E 523.50 iect to thc
Northeast Coraer ol Utal parcet describcd ia Sook 527 at Pagc.?f3-qs
Eeceptioa l'lo. ?9388t; lhcacc atoag tlze bo_undary ol said pareet S 7Eo
22' 10' f 321.42 tcet; beace S 8i 40' l5' E 376.29 leel to s poinl oa
the tiorthe:t, Righl-Of-tar ol Couaty RoaC No. 335; theace aloog said
PJght-Of-tay S-7Eo 58'32'f 207.05 leet; theace l4o.l5 leet along a .
cine to tbe to the lett, hariaz a radius ol 1030.0O leet, e cealral :
englc ol 7o 47'46': thc chord-ol vlich bcarc S 75e 04' 40't l4O-O4
leit; theacc S ?te l0' 47' f 996.23 feet: tbeece 66.20 lcat alo4g the
sc ol a curPe to the lclt ban'ag Q ccatrat aagle ol 7c O9' 25'-aad a
radius ol 530.00 fcct. thc ebord-o[ rhich bcan S 67e 36' 05' lf 66-to
lee!: thcnce S 64e 0t'4t'tr 296.11 lect: thcnce ciepartiag scid :
llight-Ol-Vay S. 0o t4' 42' E 6$.7q k1t to a poiaC oa Uc Soutb tine
oi said Scetioa 4: thczcc S d9a ?o' 08' Y leod.g8 lcet: to the Poll{f
Of EECINNINC; said dcscribcd trac! contaiaiag 97.269 acres, aore o?
/ess.
Exhiblt 4 Page 9
N ECE I VED APR
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
At a regular hearing ofthe Board of Couuty Commissioners for Garfield Couaty,
Colorado, held in the Commissioners'Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthousg in Glenwood Spriogs
on - Monda:r . the 7th of April AD. l9l2- there were presert:
Marian I. Smith . Commissioner Cbairuran
Iohn Martin , CommissionerIanryMcCown , Courrrissioner
Don DeFord , County Attorney
lvfildred Alsdorf - CI€rl( ofthe Board
Chuck Deschene.s County Administrator
.when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit:
. RESOLUTIONNO. qz_ze
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A FLOODPLAIN SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO SI'BDTWSION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Crarfield County, Coloradq has received
application from Gene lfilton for a Floodplain Special Use Permit to allow the placement offill materid in
ponions oftheflood fiinge ofthe Colorado River and Garfield Creek onthe following described tract ofland:
See Anached: Exhibit A
Gn the State of Colorado and the County oiGarfield); ana
WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing oo the 7th day of October, 1996, upon the question of
whetlrerthe abovedescdbed Floodplain Special Use Permit should be granted or denied, at which hearing
the pblic and imerested pemoos were giveu the oppornrnity to express their opinions regarding the issuance
of said Special Use Permiq and
WIEREAS, the Board on the basis of substantial comp€tetrt evidence . produced a the
aforemeirtioned hearing has made the following determination of fact:
1. That proper publication md pqblic notice was provided as required by law for the heuiag
before theBoard of County Commissioners.
[ilil l!ill lillll lllll lflll llllllllllllllllll llll llll
)
)ss
)
586?46 Wt0gllgs? 03:35P 81014 Psos 447
1 of 5 R O.W0 O O.@ !l 0.BO GRRFIEID C0UI{TY CN.CR
Exhibit 4 Page {0
2. That the hearirg beforetbe Board of Cormty Commissioners uas ortensive and completg that
all peninent frcts, mfiters and issues were sbmitted and that all interested parties were heard
at that hearing.
3. That the application is in compliance with the Garfield County ZoongResohrtion of 1978,
as amended.
4. For the above stated ard other reasoolt, the proposed use.is in the best imeres of the hcaftb,
safety, moralq @nvenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield Coumy.
' NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Coumy Commissioaers of Garfield
Courry, Coloradq that thi Floodplain Speciat Use Permit. be and hereby is authorized permining the usb of
the above described tract of land for the placement of fill material in portions of the flood fiinge of the
Colorado River and Garfield Creetg upon the following specific conditions:
l. That all repres€ntations ofthe applicarq either within.the application or statcd at the hearing
before the Board of Couty Commisiioners, shall be considered conditions of approval.
2. Tbat ttrc Sp€cid Use Permit shall be issued uften all conditions of appronal are mct and shall' .be subject to adherence to specific conditions to be contained within tlrc Subdivision
Improvements Agreement for the Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision.
3. That dl placement of fill materid shall be in accordance with the engineering spccifications
for this t1rye of floodplain developmeut
4. That the compaction offill material shatl be field verified by the developet's engineer, as it is
being placd and the engineer shall provide individual, 'as-buih" ele\ration certificates, for
each affected lot, upoo completion.
5. That approval of this Special Use Permit shall in no way be consnred as approval of the
Raplds on the Colorado SuMivision, nor shall it obligate the Board of Courny Corrnissioners
to approve said nrbdivision.
6. That approval ofthis Special Use Permit shall preclude thb necessity of compliance with the
following plat note/condition of approval proposed for the Rapids on the Colorado
Subdivision:
She speci6c, building foundations urd indMdual sernage disposal system desigrs
shall be s$ject to individual Floodplain Special Use Permit applications and appronal, prior
to the issuance of a building permit for any construoipn identified within thc 100-year
floodplains of the Colorado kT and/or Crarfield Creek.
Prior to Final Ptat, the developeds engineer strall zubmil site specific engineered plans for
residential dwelopnient within tlre flood fringe of the Colorado River and Garfield Creels-
Furthermore, all dwelopment in these areas'shatl be consistent with these plans and shall be
lllilililt ilillr illlr ilrffifiil llllt ilt il[tfllllt
5E674O UIOE/l*r! 0Il:35P BtOl4 PE0(9 U72 ol 5 R A.@ D O.@ n d-eg, GaPF?Ft n r:rTtNw FJ ED
t
Exhibit a pagC tf
7.
required to furnish as-burtL elevation ceftificates demonstrating that all.construction meets
the provisions of Seaion 6.09 of the Garfield Couuty Zonng Resohrtioo of 1978, as
3mendd prior to the issnnce ofa Certificae of Ocanpancyby the Crarfield Couty luilding
Departrnent.
That the lowest floor, including basemenfi, of any new building designed for residentiat
occupansy shall not be less than one (l) foot above the maxinnrm wat6 elevation ofthe lOG
year flood as daermined by the Garfield Coumy Flood Insurance Sudy.
That orrsite individual sewage diqposal systems shall be located so irll to avoid impairment of
thern or contamination fro them during a lfr)-year flood went.
Ttra priorto issuance of a building permiq, the ovmer of each lot shall pr€pare and zubmit a
soils and foundationreporg anLS-D.S. desig and a gading ard drainage plan prepared and
certified by a professional enginea- All improvemeuts shall be constructed in accordancc
with such measures, wtrich strall be a condition of the building permit.
That the applicant/dweloper shall take prudent measures to control dust generation utd
migration fiom the site, for the duration of development on the site.
8.
9.
10.
Dated*his--Qln- day of
ATTEST:
. AD.19-97_.Aori I
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COLORADO
%r,;JJM-
Chairman
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote:
Commissioner Chairman tlarian I. Smith ,Aye
Commissioner John F. lrlartin ,Aye
, Ayel^ammi ce i anar f-rrrtl T ilal^ar.rn
I lllil lllll llllil m llllll llill lll lll lllll llll lll
soeTio utoarrssz 03:35P 81014 P810 ''147i-;i'a n o.ss D 0.00 !l o-00 GRRFIELD cou$rY cLER
'Exhibit a Page 12
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
I, , County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board ofCounty
Cunmissioners in and for the Coumy and Stare aforesaid do hereby certify that the armexed and foregoing
Resolution is truly copied from the Records ofthe Proceeding ofthe Board of County Commissioners for
said Garfield Coumy, now in my office.
IN WTINESS WHEREOB I have hereuuto set my hand and afrxed the seal of said Couuty, at
Glenwood Springs, this ' dayof aD. l9_.
Coumy Clerk and or-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
Illlilt lllllllllll lllll lllllllllll llllllllilll lllllil
)
)ss
)
506?40 O4l0gltgg? 03:35F 81014 P811 147
4 of 5 R 0.0O O O.wA N 0.Oo GRRFIELO C0LNTY
E rhibit?Efie t3
LEG.AL DESCFIIPTION
The Hapids of the Colorado
LEGAL DESCHIPTION
A tract of land situated in the SW1/4 of Section 4 and the SEl/4 of
Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 91 West ol the 6th P.M. described
as follows:
Beginning at the Soulhwest Corner of said Section 4; thence N 0o 50' 00'
W 438.10 feet along the West line of said Section 4 and along the
Easterly line ol that parcel of land described in Book 570 at Page 256 in
the Office of thi Garfietd County Clerk.and Recorder;
thence N 75".43' '18' W 101.89 feet;
thence N 17" 08' 41' W 115;59 leet;
thence N 53o 47' 08' W 1T1.73 leet to the center of the Colorado River;
thence along the center ol said river N 23o 43'15" E 339.10 feet;
thence N 23" 43' 20" E 310.00 feet;
thence N 35o. 08' 15' E 419.25 feet;
lhence N 42" 56' 13" E 499.62 feet:
thence N 65o 01' 47" E 404.40 teet
thence N 71" 35: 12" E 503.50 feet;
thence N 84o 15' 20" E 284.99 feet;
thence S 81o 33' 38' E 244.41 feet;
thence S 58" 02' 47" E 266.82 feet;
thence S 680 42' 11' E 476.70 feet;
thence departing the center of said Colorado River S 0o 29' 34u E 523.50
leet to the Northeast .Corner of that parcel described in Book 527 al paga
743 as Reception No.293881; Thence along the boundary of said parcel
S 78o 22' 10" !/V 321.42 feet; lhence S 8o 40' 15' E 378.29 feet to a point
on the Northerly Right-Of-Way of County Road No. 335; thence along
said Right-Of-Way S 78" 58; 32' w 2o7.o5 feet; thence 140.15 leet along
a curve to the left, having a radius of'1030,00 feet, a central angle of 7'
47' 46"1 the.chord of rvhich bears S 75" 04' 40" W 140.04 feet; thence S
.71o 10' 47" W 396.23 feet; thence 66.20 feet along the arc of a curve lo
the left having a central angle ol 7a 09' 25" and a radius of 530.00 feet;
the chord of which bears S 57o 36'05c W 66.16 feet; thence S 64o 01'
23" W 296.11 feet; thence departing said Right-Of-Way S 0o 14'42'E
653.78 feet to a point on the South line of said Section 4; thence S 89o
20' 08" W 1308.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; said described tract
containing 97.269 acres, more or less.
tryJxl$',''ll!!ll,[!!$l1iltlll!''L[lHjllll'L
ffi
EXHIBIT 5
Rapids on the Colorado "As Built"
Utilities - Water, Electricity,
Telephone, Natural Gas
EXHIBIT 5
E thibit 5 Page 1
ry&lEr_tw$EwifrA-JJ-noattrt DaNffi
ffiaN&offin,lB,E
M@atuuaagr-EffiTwia'fEffDuSDraoNatu
o'
tr
;
EDo&
to3a-a
f,.cxul
E t:h
$Iffi
hq
O
/ #qHq.bf,r\ t
Eb
HE
68
@o
-o.
tr
UJ
-Il-
dimpf E
JO
i[B Et n
ull 1.cll0 n0, rMlra !,t:
EXHIBIT 6
Map r Garfield County
Land Use Districts
EXHIBIT 6
E Oibit 6 Page ,
==cE=E-
==EEIE E=
=I=;: sE
EE=;===EEE;;EosB
ffiTfiEEEEEEEE
gre
E:EaEa**a E=a= ;
a [Iffiffin ffiffiI[ffi
at-Itri
Bs
=<)(-5x q
lji{oi=
+35sc\f <-)
c-)-<tr-iq
:
>.a
H.C,)
ct)
ts..L)q
tsc-r)+-{a
k1
C-r)
t-)--)
q
=t-lakI
C,1
CSa-{sn<a-
IEar1f.+*d-oor' s
,tIi't
Exhibit 6 Page Z
EXHIBIT 7
Map r Current Zoning of
Rapids
EXHIBIT 7
Exhlbit 7 Page 2
EXHIBIT 8
Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT 8
ErhibitS Page t
.f imffiE-i$*lS
irrr
s r ne "llil
g
5
€s
I
E
T
Exhibit 8 Page 2
EXHIBIT 9
Assessor's Map and
Addresses of Adjacent
Owners
EXHIBIT 9
GARFIELD COU NTY ASSESSOR'S II'IAP
PARCELS AND OWNERS AS OF DECECBER 20, 2OO5
st 1 @l 'l hill'o#l 'l\ z
@ l-- l@H3{ I ll ,-, I -1 ////l/til ?fl*/:SEE MAB
@
*4
rlo
zt*1+32
44-
I
3
@
I
,l
Com
@
Gen
//-
I
@mx
=-g
,lo
!D€
9.
SCHEDULE OF PROPERW OWNERS WTTHIN 2OO FEET OF THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
l{ames and addreeses of owner of rccord of all parcels adjolnlng and within two hundrcd feet
(200) feet of the proposed subdivision, includlng thoee separated only by a public rlght-of-way
The ownership and addrceses werc obtained fiom the offfce of the Gafidd County Assessor on
September 28, 2006
{. Parcel 218{-031{10-15E
JACE, LLC
1444 Louer Rlver Road
Sndmals, CO 81654
2. Parcel 218{{5a{Xr-129
Donald Rayand Sandra L Snyder
Box I
ilw Gasde, Co 81647{X109
3. Parel21814ffi-111
f,urlch, Patlcla L
P.O. Box588
Panecllfr, CO 80.fl{{588
4. Parcel 2{81-091{10{176
Parcel 21 8l {1.0t0{Xl-l 64
Gene R. and tary J. Hllton
2102WeetArapahoe Ddw
Utilebn, CO 80120€qr8
5. Parcel 21E{{t5'l{0-l'O
Flod L and Gharlotb J. Snyder
P.O.Box277
J{ewGas0e, CO81il7.0,2T1
8. Parcel 2181-0'l+flr{l7l
B;annen Prcpertie, lnc
JF&TCo..
P O. Box489
Glenwood Spdngs Colorado 81602
7. Parcel 2181{5'l{X}-25{
Toucan land Go. RLLLP
65 Rlppy Lane
llqrGar0q CO 81647
8. Parcel 2l8l{t54{-208
Paullnc Rlppy
Box 24ii
lkur Casde, CO 81647
9. ParcdzlBl-tnfi-mi
Stab of Colorado
Dtuislon of Wldllfe
6060 Broadray
DenY€r, CO 80216-{029
10. Parcel 2l8l;0'|.?{G{20
Kenneth R. and PegryA Colline
38i!9County Road 3ll5
llew Cac0e, CO 816'07€6al
11. Parcel 2t8l-183{0{t85
Richad end taryJolley Femily, LLLF
1288 Gounty Road 245
NwCasde, CO81647
12. Parcel 21a1{nl1{l}-1Z-
tary Edith Lognn
39492 Rlwr Frontage Rord
Nery Casde, GO 816t17
13. Parcet 2l8l{4:l{Xl-125
Eadene and Clyde Dale Alcom
38992 Rhrcr Frcntrgo Rd
ilewCasde, CO81647
14. Parcet 2t8t{43{r0{16
RlckAnhony Rakich
5'l Rlppy lem
l{ryCas0e, COSlel7
{5. lnbt:teb 70 Rlght of Way
Colorado Departnent of Tranrpolffion
Plans and Sunnyr Sec0on
tl()l East Arlranoar Awnue
Denver, COW222
t6. 2181-x-u-001 thrcugh 033
Rapi6 on the Golorado Rlvor
Homeowmc Arcn. and Repldr
DevolopmentGorponton
2t02WeltArapahoe Dtlve
Litfleton, CO E0120€flr8
17. 218143{17{EE and 007-OlO
Gene R. and taryJ. Halton
21 02 West Arapahoe Drlve
Ll(ileton, COmt20€008
Sdndule of Ropeily otvmts Within 2@ F€6t 9.28.2006.doc
THE RAPIDS ON THE GOLORADO
SCHEDULE OF MINERAL OWNERS
Refierence Legal [)*cription
ihme and addlecsee of, mners of rBcord of minera! dghts rrithln the propoced danned unlt
Oawtopmemt
Federal l-and Bank
Wichita, Kansal
(Onns one-half of
minerals locabd on open
apace lande located
south of CR 335 and west
of GR 3{2).
Gene R. Hilbn and
i[ary J. Hilton
2lO2 West Arapahoe
Drive
Llttleton, GO 80{ 20€008
Elfilbit 9 Page 5
EXHIBIT 10
Legal Description
121 .488 Acres
EXHIBIT {O
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
PLAI\INED I'NIT DEVELOPMENT
121.488 ACRE PARCEL
A tract of land situated in the SEI/4SW114 rnd the SWl/4SEl/4 of Section 4 and the IttWl/4NEl/4
of Section 9 att in Township 6 South, Range 9l West of the 6th P.M. being described as follows:
BEGII{MNG AT the Southwest Corner of said Section 4;
Thence N 00o50'00"W 438.10 feet along the West line of said Section 4 and along the Easterly line
of that parcel of land described in Book 57O rtPage266 in the Ofrice of the Garfield County Clerk
and Recorder;
Thence N 75043'18" W 101.89 feet;
Thence N 17o0E'41" W 115.59 feet;
Thence N 53047'08" W 177.75 feet to the center of the Colorado River;
Thence along the center of said river N 23043'15" E 339.10 feet;
Thence N 23043'20" E 310.fi) feet;
Thence N 35o0E'15, E 419.25 feet;
Thence N 42056'131' E 491.62 fet;
Thence N 65q01'47" E 404.40 feet;
Thence N 71035'12" E 503.50 feet;
Thence N E4"15'20" E 284.99 feet;
Thence S 81o33'38" F.244.4lfeet;
Thence S 58q02'47" L2ffi.82fwt;
Thence S 68042'll" E 4E0.81 feet to the West line of the Brannan Subdivision Exemption No. 1;
Thence along said VYest line and departing the center of said Colonado River S 00050'54'' E 520.60
feet to the Northeast Comer of that parcel described in Book 527 rtPrge743 as Reception No.
2938E1;
Thence along the boundary of said parcel S 78q22f 10" W 328.61 feet;
Thence S 08o40'15u E 430.97 feet to the Southerly Right of Way of County Road No.335;
Thence along said Right of Way N 79002115" E' 4.10 feet;
Thence along r curve to the right with an arc length oI303.67 fee$ a radius of 389.99 feet, e central
angle of tKo36'48"r r chord bearing of S 78039"21" E, a chord length of 296.05 feet;
Thence S 56%0'56t' 8284.92 feet;
Thence along r curve to the left with an rnc length of 67.52 feeg a radius of 19132 feeg a ccntrrl
angle of 20013115", a chord bearing of S 6627'34" f,ra chord length of 67.17 fcrlt;
Thence departing said Right of Way S 17047'53" E 308.48 feet;
Thence S 12052'36" E7Xi.29 feet;
Thence along a curve to the right with an arc length of 236.48 feet, a radius of 54835 feet, a central
angle of 24oA'34", a chord bearing of S fi)o31fl9* E, a chord length of 234.65 feet;
Thence S 11049'58'r W 141.56 feet;
Thence S 890'30'00" W 318.77 twt;
Thence N ll30'00il W 1150.00 feet;
Thence N 49qi0'00" W 395.00 feet;
Thence S 70045'00" W E70.00 feet;
Thence S 29000'00r' W 414.95 feet;
Thence S 0fl4'42tt E64.l4foet;
Thence S 8920'08" W 1308.98 fect to the Point of Beginning containing 121.4EE Acres.
Irgal l2l.doc
s+,# q1
VOLUME 2
Exhibrfs
The Ra rds
104 Sinole-Familv Residential Units
Zone District Amendment
Application
Subdivision Application -
Preliminary Plan
On the Colorado
RPUD.Hdr. Vol 2 Edribils.doc