HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.04 Application Part 5ru,e_*i !t__g,,ry!,ny sec m en
\nalyst CDR$encyorCompany KHA
)ate Performed 01412006
\nalysis Time Periqd Existinq
rlighway CR-33S;om/To CR-312 to New Casfle l-70 lntlurisdiction Garfeld County
Malysis Year 2006
ffi Cu., I highvay ffi* cu.. lt highway
Tenain ffitevel ffiRoling
Two-way hourly volume 402vehth
Directional split 60 / 40
Peak-hourfacbr, PHF O.ggNo-passingzone 100
% Truckq and Buses , P, S o/o)'
% Recreational vehlcles, p* iyo
Acosss poinwmi 10
3rade adjustnentfactor, fu Gxhlbit 2O.D 1.00
)assenger-car egulvalonts br trucks, ET (Ahbit 2O-g)1.7
,assenger-car equlvalonb lbr RVs, ER (Edibft 20-9)1.0
Heavy-vehicle adjustnent hctor, f* f*=1/ (1+ prGfl)+pF(Ep.i) )0.966
Iwoarayflow rater, v, (pcJtr) vo=V/ (pHF. f6.f6yl 473
rr' hlghest directinnd split prcportion2 (pc/h)2U
Freo-Flovv SDeed from F'ield Measursnent Estmateoffi
Field Measured speed, S* mi/h
Observed volume, V, veh/h
Free-flor speed, FFS FFS=Srr+0.00n6N/ f{v ) 38.3 mi/h
Base tee-florv speed, BFFS*
Adj. for lane width and shoulder widths, fLs (Exhibit 2G,5)
Adj. for access points, fo (Exhibit 20-6)
:reoflonr speed, FFS (FSS=BFFgfrs-fA)
45.1
mil]
4;1
mi/t
2.1
mlll
38.i
mut
Mj. for no-pasling zones, fn, ( mi/h) (ExhiHt 20-1 i )4.3
{verage kavelspeed, ATS ( mi/h) ATS+F$0.00776vod"30.3
3rade Adjustment factor, fb Gxhibft 20€)1.00
,assenger-car equivalents firr kucks, Er (Exhibit 20-10)1.1
Passengercrequlvalenb br RVs, E- (Efilblt 20-10)1.0
{eavy-vehlcle adJustment hctor, f6y f*=l/ (11 p1@r-l)+e.1go-1;;0.995
lwoway flow rater, vo (pc/fr) vp=V/ (pHF. fG . fHv)459
rro' highestdirectiond split proportion2 (pc/h)275
Sase percert fine.spent-fg!@ng, BPTSF(%) BpTSF=100(i-e{.0fl)87evr1 33.2
Mj. fordlrectional distribrnion and no-passing zone, fdh"e6xExh. 20.12)21.8
)ercent 0me.spent-follorlng, pTSF(%) pTSF=BpTSF+f ,."55.0
Level of servlce, LOS (Elhibit 2G3 for Ctass I or 20-{ for Class ll)
y'olume to capaclty rato v/c v/c=Vp/ 3,200 0.15
,eak lfFmh veh*nlles dfravel,VMTr. (veir- mi) WTrs= 0.291_r(V/pHF)114
Two-Way Page 1 of2
'cl-- /rrt-\n^ --!a^-.- ^-J o^*:--^\ ^,.a:^ -^--.^\T ^^^l cr^r+:--^\.r"*-\^ol-r'rnn +*_
402
O I A l^trrra
l&min total travel tme, TT..(veh-h) fi
lf v- >= 3,200 pcy'h, terminate analysi+the LOS is F. 2. lf highest dire"ti*"| .plit rr,= 1,7@ pdh, b-in"H .
Two-Way
HCS20oorM
vehicle-mles of travel. VMT (veh- mi) VMT =V*\
Page 2 ofZ
Version 4.1dCopyrlght @ 2OO0 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
6'''A A'
CDR
KHA
u4t2006 CR-312 to New Casde l-70 lnt
Garfleld County
,I, :$muffir.s(Hl lr____ffi:-.
M Cur" I higtrway ffi cn., il highway
Tenain ffi Levet H* nomng
Two-way hourly volume 426 veVh
Direclional split 60 / 40
Peak+ourfacbr, pHF O.gB
No-passing zme 100
% Trucks and Buses , p, S %
% Recrsational vetrictes, p* S%
Access points/ml i0
adiustment factor, fc Gxhibit 2G4
eguivalents for tucks, E, (Exhibit 20-9)
equivalentS br RVs, ER (E6iblt 2O-9)
adjusfn€nt Actor, fs7 f*=l/ 11 + Pr(Er-1 )+pn(E.-1 ) )
flor ratet, v. (pcJh) v.=V/ (PHF. f^ .
'highest dlrectond split proportion2 (pclh)
Measured speed, S* mi/h
volume, V, veh/h
ree-flor speed, FFS FFS=Srr+0.9gnGN/ tHv ) 38.3 mi/h
for lane width and shoulcter widlh3, to {exniUit ZOS)
for access points, L (Exhibit 20€)
for nepassing zones, fno ( mVh) (ExhiHt 20-l 1)
travel speed, ATS ( milh) ATS=FFS-O.OOZ76V
equivalents for trucks, Er (Exhibit 20-10)
equivalen6 for RVs, ER (Efilbit ZO-IO)
adiustment &ctor, f6, f*=1/ ({ + P1@r-l;+e*1e*-1; ;
floI ot"', vo Oc/h) vo=V/ (PHF * fG . fi{v)
'highest directiond split proportircn2 (pcn)
for direcdonal distribution and no-passing zone, fr,""(%)(Ex h. 20-121
lime.spent-fofiovrring, PTSF(7o) PTSF=BPTSF+f
to capacity ratio vlc vlc=Y^l 3,200
1$mh veh<niles of tavel,VMTno (veh- ml) VMT
Two-Way Page 1 of2
Gl''//n'\n^arrmanfc aarl Qaffincc\nrrr*ic rarrra\T aaor eoffinac\Tamn\slrr??o +ma alAl.rnnA
1$mh total travel tme, TT
tf v^ >= 3,200 pc/h, terminatd analysi+the LOS ls F. 2. lf highest diretti*"t tplilrr'= 1'70 pdh, b-in"t
Two-Way
vehicle-mlesof travel,VMT* (voh- mi) VMT6'
Copyright @ 2000 Univecity of Florida, All Rights Reserved
f,la.//la.\T\anrrmanfs onrl (affincs\arrr{ia rnrrra\T nnol Saffincc\Tanrtn\c?lr??O +rnrt
Page2 of.Z
Version 4.1d
9lal1filrA
Two-Way Page 1 of2
\nalyst CDR\gencyorCompany KHA
)ate Performed U412OO6
Malysis Time Period Backqround olus proimt
Hishway cE-45-Fom/To CR-312 to New Caste l-70 lntJurisdiclion Garfield County
----- -
\ndlysis Year 2oo8
h
-lr:
ffi Cht. I higtrway ffi ch.. il highway
Tenain ffitevet Wnoning
Two.way hourly volume S5g veh/h
Directional split 60 / 40
Peak-hour facbr, PHF 0.Bg
l,lopasshg zons 100
% Trucks and Buses , P, S o/o
% Recreational vetricles, p* S%
Access polntsi/mi 10
Srade adJustnentfactor, fo Gxhiblt 2O-4 1.00
>assongorrar oquivalenb br tucks, E, (Exhibit 20-9)1.2
)asserger+arequlvalenb fur RVs, ER (E<hibit 2O-9)'t.0
{eavy-vehlcle adjustment hctor , tH!1 t*=ll (1+ pr(Er.1)+pn(Ep-l
1 I 0.990
fwo-nray f,ryr ratel, v, (nc/h) vo=V/ (pHF . fo . frv)6110
ro 'highest dirccffond splft proporton2 lpcn;384
Ftee-Flotv speeo rcrm field Measurgnent Farlm.t6.l Fru-Etnl
Field lVleasured speed, Sr" mUh
veh/h)bserved volume, \
sree-flovv speed, FFS FFS=SFM+0.00776N/ tHv ) 38.3 mi/h
Base fee-flor speed, BFFST,45.(
mi/t
4.1
mUt
2.a
mi/t
38.i
mi/fi
Mj.
Adj.
for lane width and shoutder widths, t * {extriOit ZOS)
for acce5s points, fo (Exhibit 20€)
=ree-isn, speed, FFS (FSS=BFF$f.s-fa)
Adj. for no-passing zones, fno ( mi/h) (ExhiHt 2C.i 1)3.7
tverage havel spe€d, ATS ( mi/h) ATS=FFS-0.00776vo-fno 29.6
srade Adjustmentfactor, fo Gxhibit 2G8)1.00
,assenger-car eguivalonts fur trucks, Er (Exhibit 20-lO)1.1
,assenger-carequh€l€nts fur RVs, ER (Elftlbft 2O-iO)1.0
{eavy-vehicle adJustnent bctor, fHv fHV=r/ (1 + p1(E1f ;+e*19*.1 1 1 0.995
Iwo-wayjlow ratel, vo (pc/tr) vo=V/ (pHF * f6 . f1a7)637
/p' hlghost diroctiond split proportion2 lpcfn;3A
Base perceriltlme-spent-fofl@rg, BPT.SF(yo] BpTSF=i00(1-e{.00087ev01 42.9
{<lj. for dlrectioral dletlbu0on and no-passing zone, fr*(%XExh. 20-121 19.5
)ercent tme-spent-follorving, PTSF(o/o) PTSF=BpTSF+f ar..62.4
Class lor
y'olumg to capaclty ratio v/c v/c=V.
,eak 1$'mh veh<nlles of bavel,VMT
3,200 :,c
0.20
159
l$mh total travel tme, TT
1 . lf v^ >= 3,200 pc/h, terminato analysis.the LOS is F. 2. lf highest directional split vo>= 1,700 pc/h, brminated anlysistho LOS is F'
Two-Way
Hcs2oooTM
vehicle-mies of travel, VMT (veh- mi) VMT,
Page2 of 2
Version 4.1dCopyright @ 2000 Unlversity of Florida, All Rights Reserved
6ta,A^^-
APPENDIX G
Proiect Troffic volume lncreose colculotion
Kimley-Horn anil Associates, lnc.
096037N0 -TtuRapids on tlu Colorailo
13=n
Proiect Traffic Volume lncrease Calculation
wB l'70 Ramp it NewcastttntoSlr"l:;o_
_on Railp
AMPeak PMPeak AMPeak PMPeak
2006 Existing Volume
Proiect Traffic Volume
Percent lncrease
EB l-70 Ramp at Newcastle lnterchange
2006 Existing Volume
Proiect Traffic Volume
Percent lncrease
86 527 58 159
165274
18.60/o 9.9% 12.1o/o 2.5o/o
Off Ramp On RamP
AM Peak PM Peak AM P6ak PM Peak
115 102 559 192
284631
1.7o/o 7 .8o/o 8.2o/o 16.10/o
ATTAGHMENT 2
Site Location Application and
Report Addendum
Prepared By Martin / Martin Consulting Engineels
ATTACHMENT 2
Incornorates AII Prior Chanees
Addendum To
SITE LOCATION APPLICATION AND
ENGINEERING REPORT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
TIIE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
Garfield County Colorado
Dated December, 2003
PROJECT NO. I6454.C.01
PREPARED BY:
MARTINA{ARTIN, D',IC.
12499 WEST COI.FAX AVENI.JE
PO BOX 151500, LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215
(303) 431-6100
PREPARED FOR:
TTIE RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
2102 WEST ARAPAHOE DRTVE
LTTTLETON COLORADO 80 120-3008
PRINCIPALIN.CHARGE: ROGER SIVTADES, P.E,
Revised: IvIay 31,2005
ADDENDUM TO SITE LOCATION APPLICATION AND ENGINEERING
REPORT DATED DECEMBER, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Form Application for Site Approval for a New Wastewater Treatnent Plant
I Preliminary Effluent Limits... I
II Location It{ap.. .. 1
m Financial.. I
tV Ownership of Wastewater Treatment Facility... 1
V WQCD Policy - Setback From Residences ... .. . :.. ... I
VI Emergency Storage Basin... I
VItr Silt, Colorado Wastewater Treatnent Opion... 2
D( Consider Extension From Apple Tree to Rapids to Silt... 2
X Easement orRight-of-Way-Rapids, Alongfuverto High School... 2
)(I Cost of Line Extension From Rapids to High School... 3
)flI Cost of 0.045 MGD SBR Plant at Rapids on the Colorado.. 3
)ilV Preliminary Comments - Dwayne Watson, CDPFIE... 3
XV Code of Colorado Regulations - 5CCR 1002-22... 4
XVII Memor.andum of Understanding-'Town ofNew Castte and Applicants 4
Exhibits
Exhibit "A" CDPHE Preliminary Effluent Limits
Exhibit "B' SketchPlanMap -l2l Units
Exhibit "C" Town of Silt - Recommendation to Garfield County
Exhibit "D" Memorandum of Understanding - New castle and Applicants
Exhibit *E' Martin / Martin Record of Dwain Watson, CDplIE, Review
Exhibit *F" Legal Description
Exhibit "G" New Castle Vicinity lvlap
Exhibit "ff' Map - Cactus Valley Ditch Alignment From Rapidsr to High School
Exhibit *I" Site Location Application'Presentation to Garfield County BOCC
WWIF Addendunr . WQQD Final.doc 6nfr,
COLORADO DEPARTMENTOF PUBUC HEALTH AND EITYTRONMENT
tilrter QuaUty Control Divislon
4300 Cherry Creek Drlve South
Denver, Colorrdo 802461530
APPIJCANTI
ADDRESSI
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FIOR CONSTRUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Rroldr Dcvcloomcnt CorDorrtlon (RDO PHoNE! -C0Pll9&1810-
,102 lf,,ar Arrnrhoe l)rlvc
CITY,STATE ZP:
Conruldog Englnccn
f .l}tlr^i l.alarcdn n0tr0-l0nl
Mrrtln / Mertln Inc-Phoae: --Gl0Dl!!dl0[-
Addros l2rl99 Wcst Colfrr Avcnue. PO'Bor 151500
A.
l.
ClO, Strtq Zlp: Lrkc*ood. Colortdo. t0213
Sutnmrrv of lnformrtlon rcp.rdlns ncw wlstcwrtcr trcrtmcnt Dlrnt:
Township 63 Rangc: ll!f- CountY:
l/4, Scction
Garfidd
Tpc and opacity of trotmcnt faciliry pmposcd: Mrjor Proccsscc Uscd Seouencinq BatcLRcactor (SBR).
f)isinfaciion
Hydreutie 45-000 grUday OrSnnic: i!2- lbs. BOD/dry
Prcscnr PE: -0-
Desigr PE:
-jgE!!Q-
% Dome*ic: % tndustrial o
Locrtion ofFrcility:
Auach r mrp of thc arer, wbich includcs thc following:
(r) S-mitc radirs: .lt 3amge bc8tnent plants, lii ctatione, rnd domcstic wrGr supply intakcs.
O) l -rnitc ndirs: hrbitablc buitdings, location of public md priverc potabtc watcr wclle, and rn rppmxirnatc
. indicationof0ctopogrrphy... - M.ps src inctudcd in Appenaix b Jf driireport
Efllucnt dispoml: Surhcc dischrrgc !o untctcout& (namc)
Subsrfrcc dirposat:
-=-
Lrnd Application:
-=-
' Evaporation:
Other (lbt):
Statc.mtcr qrnlity classification of rcceivinS wltcrsoursdr):
Proposcd Efilucnt Umitations dcvetopcd in conjunction wilh thc Wrtcr Quelity Conuot Division:
BODI
-m84
SS
-md
Fccal Coliform
-/100
nl
Totrl Rcsidud Chlorinc
-
mg/l Ammonir- m8/l Othcr
lVill r Statc or Fcdenl grroy'lour bc rought lo fiource rny portion ofthir project?
Prcsent zoning ofsitc rrcr?Arieultunl/?2ridantiaVRural Dcn3itv f ARRD)
Zoning within r l-milc ndiur of sitc?AI ARRfr CG. OS fSac Zonino Mno in AnocndixN)
lVhrt ic thc dirtancc downstrcam from lhc dischargc to lhc ncarest domestic wttcr tuPPty intrkc? --J.!dilE-
Namcof Supply:Town of Silt
Proporcd Locrtion (Lrgal Description):
-SU--
l/4,
Addrcsr ofSupply ifi nmil SIh OOtt6tt
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONS]RUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATN{ENT PIIIIYT
What is the disuncc downsucam fiom thc discbargc o thc ncarcet othcr point ofdivcrsion?
NemcofUscr: CitvofRifle
l3 Milcc
Addros ofUscr: 202 Railroad Avc. PO Box 1908. Riflc. CO. 81650
Whst cntity has lhc rcsponsibility for opcrating 0re prop-oscd hcility?
.
Thc Rrpids on the Colorado Homcowners
Associrtion wilt hirc a Ccrtified oocrator to ooeratc the WWIF whcn it is constructcd.
Who owns orc land upon which tbc facility will bo constructcd?
(Plc8r rthch copier of tbc document crtrting ruthority h orc ryptiorat o corumra the propolcd frcitity rt ftir dc)
t0.Estimatcdprojcctcosu 3616.000
llfho is financially rcsponsible for lhc construction and operation of thc facility? Raoids Develooment Corooration
I l. Namcs rnd addrcsscs of all municipalitics and watcr and/or sanitation disuicts wifiin 5 milcs downstrcam of thc proposcd
wrstcwsrcr trasErcnt facilityritc. TOWN OF SILT
(Ati.cb r scprrrtc rhcct ofpepcr ifncccrs.ry)
t2.ls thc facility in r l0Gpar 0ood plrin or othcr nrtural hazsrd .rcr? No
Ifso, what prccautioru ere bcing trkcn?
Has thc flood pltiin bccn dcsignatcd by thc Colorado Wrtct Corucrvation Board, Dcpanmcnt ofNatural Resourccs or
othcr agcncy?Colorsdo Waicr Conseruation Boerd
(Agcncy Nrmc)
lf ro, what is that dcsigmtion? _
Plcasc identify ury additional factors ttrrt might hclp 0rc Wrar Qurlity Conuol Division makc rn informcd dccision on
yout tpplicrtion for sitc rppmwl. -Tlrc Rapids on the Colorado is a plrncd subdivision with orovisions for ISDS
rystems on each lot
t3.
(Attrch r rcprntc rhoot ofprpcr if noccrnry)
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
lfthc frclllty wlll bc locrtcd on or rdJeccnt to r rttc thrt h owncd or mraegcd by r fcderel or strt. rgency' 3c!d
thc egeocy.e copy ofthtr rppllcrdon for thc egcncyrl rcvlcw tnd rccommcndrdon.
Rccommendrdoo of govcrnmentd .uthorltles:
Plcrsc rddress thc fotlowing ireuc ln lour rccommen&tion dcclrion. Are thc proposcd ficititier consistcnt wirh thc
comprchcrsivc plrn md ury othcr plonr. policics, rndor rcguluionr for tbc ucr, including thc 201 Fecility Plrn c 208
W.tcr Qudity Mrnrgerncnt Phn, u thcy rffcct wrtcr qudity? If you havc rny furthc( oommcnts or questioq plcrrc cell
o03) 692-1500.
Drtc
Rcconmcnd
Approvd
Rccornmcnd
D&uuevd
SiErrnuc of
Rcorcccntitivc
2.
Commant
of Ncw Qs0c (within 3 miles)City or Town (lf ritc ir ind& boudrry)
lacd HcdtAuthmity
Murrgcmcnt Pluniry Agsncy
Gcnc R. Hilton. Prcs. RDC
,.4,
,r'4. 2:
b caclorcd.
./il*/o-*gD.ts / /
-
Si3nrurc of Applicrnt I)rycd Nrnc
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER IREATII{ENT PIIINT
ATTACHMETgT TO SITE APPLICATION
In accordancc wi$ C.RS. l9El, 25-8-702 (2Xa), O), and (c), and 0re "Rcgulations for &c Sitc Application Proccss',
$c Waar Qtulity Conuol Division must dctcrmine that cach sits location is consisGnt with thc long rangg
comprcbensivc plannrlg for thc arca in which it is to bc locato{ that 0rc ptant on the proposcd sitc wilt bi managcd to
minimizc theporcntial advcrse impacts on watcr qusltty, and rnust cncouragc tlrc consolidation ofwastcuatcr
trcatmcnt works ufrcncvcr fessiblc.
In making this detcrminatioq thc Division requircs each applicant fora sitc approvat for a domestic wastcwatcr
Ecatment works to supply u cnginccring report describing thc projca and showing thc applicant's capabitities to
managc and operate thc facilityovcr lhe lifc of 0rc project to dctenninc thc potcntial advcrsc impacts on watcr quality.
Thc rcport shall bc considcred the culmination of thc planning process and as a minimum shalt addrcss thc followinf:
Scrvicc area dsfinition including cxisting and projectcd population, sitc location, staging or phasing
flodloading pojcctions, and rclatiopship to o0rer water and wastewater treatment plaou in Oc arca
Proposcd sitc location, evaluation ofaltcmativc sitcs, and cvaluation oftreatment altcrnatives.
Pro,poscd efllucnt limitations as devcloped in coordination with the Division
Analysis of existing facilitics within the scrvice area(s).
Analpis of opportunities for consolidation of beatmcrrt works in accor&ncc with thc provisions of
22.3(IX4 including those rccomrnended in the watcr quatity managcmcnt plan, unless the approved
watGr guality managcmcnt plan recommends no consoli&tion.
Evidcncc that the proposcd sitc and facility opcratioas wilt not be advenely cffccted by floodplain or
other natural hazards. Wherc such hazards are idcntificd at ttrc selccted sitc,.the rcport stnlt describc
means of mitigating tbc hazard.
Evideooc shall bc prescnted in tbc form ofa rsport, containing soils tcsting results and desigr
rccomrncn&tions ald prepared by a Profcssional Geologist and a Geotcchnical Engineer, or by a
profcssional mccting the qualifications ofboth Professioaal Geologist aod Gcotcchnical Eogineer, wittr
an appropriarc lercl ofexpcricnce invcstigating gcologic hszzrds, stating that tlte sitc witl support thc
proposcd facility.
Dctailcd dcscription of selectcd altematives iucluding lcgat descriptiot.of thc sitc, trcatrncnt qrstcm,
description, desigp capacitics, and opcrational stalfing nceds.
Lega! an-anggments showing conrol of sitc for the projca life or showing ttre ability of 0rc entity ro
rcquirc the sitc and wc it for thc projcct 1;1s. {pprovd by thc Division of an application for sio
approval shall not bc dccmcd to bc a dacrminatioo that thc proposcd tcatment works is ot is not
ncses$ry, that thc proposcd siti is or is not thc bcst or only sitc upon wtristr to locatc such a trcsunent
worls, or that location of a treatnent works on the sitc is or is not a reasonablc public usc justi$ing
condcmaation ofthc site. Approval by thc Dvision shall only bc deemcd to bc a determination ttr* ttrc
sitc application mects thc requiremcnt ofthis regulation 22 (5 CCR lCf,2-22).
tnstitutional anangcments such as contract and/ or covenanl Grms which will bc finatized to pay for
acceptable wastc bcatmenl
Management capabititics for controlling tbc wastewatcr loadings within thc capacity limitations of tfuc
proposcd trcatmenl wlrls, i.e., uscr contsac{s, opcrating agrecmcnts, prctreatment rcquiremcnts and o.r
the managcmcnt capabilitics to cxpand thc fasilities as nccded (subjcct to the appropriate, firturc review
and rpproval proccdures).
Finsncial systcrq which has bccn dcvctoped to providc for nccessary capitat and sontinucd operation,
rnaintcnancc, and rcplaccmcnt through thc life of thc projcct" This would include, for exampic,
anticipatcd fce stnrctue.
Implcmentation plan and schcdulc including estimatcd constrruction timc and cstimatcd strrt up darc.
ADDENDUM TO SITE LOCATION APPLICATION AI{D
ENGINEERTNG REPORT DATED DECEMBER, 2OO3
The Rapids on the Colorado - Garfield County, Colorado
PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM
This Addendum provides the following information:
o Incorporates Preliminary Efluent Limits Provided by the CDPIIE, WQCD for the proposed Rapids on the
Colorado Planned Unit Development
o Recommendation for fuproval by the Board of County Commissioners
o Recommendation for Approval by the Town ofNen, Castle
o Recommendation by Town of Silt that New Castle be responsible
o Modifies computations contained in the December 2003 Engineering Report to reflect a decrease in density
from l94unitsto l2l ruits
o Modifies computations contained in the December 2003 Engineering Report to refloct a doueaso in
proposed plant capacity from .060 MGD units to 0.045 MGPD
o Attaches Jamrary 24, 2Co4 telephone comments by Dwain Watsor! CDPHE, to the lvlartin / I{artin
December, 2003 Engineoing Report
. Addresses the issues noted by Dwain Watson in the telecon noted above
. Mscellaneous - Provides the legal description, maps and cost comparisons of various dtematives
involving Silt, New Castle Apple Tree and The Rapids. Attaches Memorandum ofUnderstanding.
Sction I. - Preliminary Effluent Limits
The Preliminary Effluent Limits - The Rapids on the Colorado WWTF, prepared by the Colorado DePartrnent of
Public Healttr and Environmerig Water Quatity Control Division, are attached as E:dribit A.
Section II. - Location Map - Wastewater Treatment Facility (WW'TF)
A map of The Rapids on the Colorado showing precisely the floodplain boundary and the location of the wastewrter
treatrnent facility is attached as E&iDit-D.
Section III. - Financial
The Rapids Developrnent Corporation will provide evidence of financial ability or z l*tter of Credit upon approval of
the WWTF site application by the County and when suFficient design information and bids are available that a financid
instinrtion couH ti reasonably certain drat the facility could be constructed for the atnount provided in a Lctter of
Credit.
Section [V.- Ovmership of the WaetewaterTreatment Facility
The Rapids Development Corporation will own and operate the WWTF. The operation urd ownership of the
facility coutd orentually be turned over to a Regional Sanitation District or other appropriate district.
Section V. - WOCD Policy Regarding Setback of Facilitlr From Residqnces
The 100-foot setback policy was oonsidered in finalizing the location of the W1VTF site. The faoilities are planned
to be enclosed in buildingg and the nearest residences will be grcater than 100 feet away. Costs for the building are
included in the estimato.
It shoutd be noted that an oristing building on Lot I, located near tlre proposed WWIT site will be-fggyd.
The desigrr of the WWm has not yet begun. State of Colorado Desigr Criteria 5.14.10 and 5.l4.ll will be
considered and complied with upon commen@ment of design. The cost for an emergency storage basin is included
in the concrete cost estimate.
WWIT Addcndun - I1IQCD Finsl.doo 6nfr'
State Design Criteria 1.3.3.9 states that design flow rate should fall between 70 and 100 gallons per person per day(GPCD). Assuming 3.5 p_eople per household, as noted by Dwain Watson of the WQCD, using tbO g8[ons per
person per day yields 350 GPD per tap.
The density of the proposed PUD is limitod by paragraph 4.07.M of the Garfield County ZonngRegulations and by
the attached Memorandum of Understanding between the applicants and the Town of New Csstl;.
Iri! Site @atigtApplication ?rovide Memorandum of
Undostanding with the Town ofNew Castle.
Ge,ne R Hilton (The Rapids) and Russell Talbg{ (Apple Tree) met with Rick Aluise (Silt Town Administrator),
Gary Pace (Public Works Director) and Janet Steinbach (Community Development Director) on January 30,Zoa4.
Mr. Aluise advised Messrs. Hilton and Talbott that the RE-2 School District was o<tending the water and sewer
lines from Silt to the new Coal Ridge High School but that the town limits did not extend to the new school.
Gene R. Hlton asked if The Rapids was within five miles of the town limits of Silt and Town Administrator, public
Worla Director and Community Development Director all confirmed that it rvas not. Subsequent reviews of the
"Stillw&ter" annexation by Silt shows that the'stillwater" boundaries in Sections 12 and 13 are within five miles. A
letter from Janet G. S!.lrU"tt, Community Development Director for the Town of Silq attached as Exhibit 6D",
confirms that Silt is within five miles and adds that "no utilities are in that looation d
location for some time. It would appear that New Castle and these developmonts could moEEsily forml
slmbiotic relationship. "
T.p f"" costs provided in Ms. Steinbach's letter are redected in the Section )O. estimate. tn addition, the distance
for the RE-2 sewer line is revised to reflect the distance ftom the school to the Town boundary as opposed to the
distance from the school to the WWTF
A fifteen-inch sewer line was ortended from Silt to the new Coal Ridge tfigh School. The line was installed along
the access road located on the south side of Interstate 70 (north of the Colorado River) and was bored undi
Interstate 70, the railroad tracks and US 6 to the school site located on the north side of US 6.
Gene R. Hilton proposed extending a line from Apple Tree along the south bank of the Colorado River to the west
end of The Rapids, crossing the river to the Lower Cactus Valley ditch diversion, following the ditch along the river
alignment to its intersection with the line being octended to the new high schoo! a distance of l.ZS miles.
o The Silt staffadvised,Ifilton and Talbott that the school district was paying for the extension of the water
and sewer lines from Silt to the school urd that there was a "costlssgygly" provision in the ortension
agreement requiring an allocation of the cost of installing the line to any future user,
A tap fee within the boundaries of Silt costs $3.500.
A tap fee outside the boundaries of Silt costs ($3.500X3)
Monthly sewer charges within the boundaries of Silt costs $39.22 and will escalate annually.
Monthly sewer charges outside the boundaries of Silt costs ($39.22 x 2) and will escalate annually.
The Town Staffwere approached regarding the possibility of negotiating a less costly tap fee. They noted
that a new ordinanc€ would be needed to permit a fee change and further noted that tho Towd had never
encouraged selling of taps outside the Town limits.
The attached letter ftom the Community Dwelopment Director of Silt notes a concem for maintaining a
sewer line that crosses private property and parallels an irrigation ditch during times when the ditch is wet.
The letter ftom the Town of Silt sumnurizes their position as: "It would appear that New Castle
developments could more easily form a symbiotig relationshio."
a
a
o
a
a
WWTT Adden&rn - WQCDFioal.doc 6ttn5
Section X. - Easements or Rights-of-Way
Prior to the meeting with the Town Stafr Gene R Hlton met with the legal counsel for the ditch company that owns
the Lower Cactus Valley Ditch. He was advised that the Town of Silt owned an interest in the ditch and that the
easements/rights of way for the ditch would not permit construction of a sewer line in the ditch easement/right of
way without the land owners consents.
The issue of easements and rights.oflway along the lower Cactus Valley Ditch were considered in the meeting with
the Silt Toum Staff. The following problems were noted:
. Silt owns part interest in the L.ower Cactus Vall€y Ditch and associued inigation ditch easenrents but the
o,isting easements cannot be used for sewer lines without approval of all property owners.
o The Rapids or Apple Tree cannot condemn the easement. Atry prop€rty owner along the proposed
alignment could stop the proposed se\iler line extension by refusing to give/sell an easement.
Section XI. - Cost of Une Extension From The Rapids to the High School
Estimated cost for The Rapids to connect to the Silt IVWTF system:
Tap Fees
River Ciossing
Pump Station
Crenerator Back-Up
Cost of Easements
l. Headworks2. Sequencfuq Batch Reactor3. Sequencing BuchReactorBasin4. UltravioletDisinfection5. Sludge Holding6. StandbyGemerator7. Outfall Structure
8. Blowors and Building
9. Building Covering Plant
10. Site Work
I l. Yard Piping
12. Electrical / Instnrmentation
13. Oufall Line
14. Contingencies at Eolo
TOTALCOST
$3,500 Per Tap X 3 (Ortside Town Limits) X t2l Units
421Feet X $200 Per Foot
Required Due to Placement ofline Under the River
To Power Pump Station In Emergencies
Not Considered Further Due to High Cost of Alternative
Pipeline to tfigh School Z.S?lvfiles X 5,280 X $35 / Foot Due To Water Iszues
Cost Recovery School 1.50 Mles X 5,280 X $35 / Foot Water Issues X 7u Rapids
$1,27q500
85,000
100,000
465,696
138,600
60,000
Unknown
$zug:t:xTotal Cost ofWastewater Treatment Lines and Taps To Connect to Silt WWTF
Section XII. -Aoole Tree
The meeting with the Town of Silt staff members was attended by Russell Talbott of Talbott Enterprises, the owner
of Apple Tree. The route proposed by Hilton initially appeared to have potential for providing a feasible way for
providing wastew&ter treatment to Apple Tree. Howwer, the costs of taps and monthly senice charges would cost
Apple Tree over Two Mllion Dollars inoluding consideration for sharing cost of lines with The Rapids. A new
mechanical plant at Apple Tree would cost approximately one-half of the amount for a line to Silt. Apple Tree
could upgrade their o<isting system at less cost than that ofa new plant..
The analysis indicated that Apple Tree would benefit from upgrading their
Section XIII. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost of 0.045 MGD SBR Plant
0.04s MGI)$ 28,000
138,000
126,000
26,000
38,000
35,000
6,000
24,400
120,000
1E,000
18,000
32,000
4,500
48.992
$.-66U!92
WWIF Adden&E - W@D Final.doc
Section XIY. - Preliminary Comments Dwain Watson, CDPHE
A .opy of the "SITE LOCATION APPLrcATION AND ENG G REPORT -TREATMENT FACILITY - The Rapids on the Colorado - Garfield County. Colorado" was providea to p*ain
Watsoq CDPHE prior to the submission of the signed copies.
Mr. Watson's preliminary comments were noted in a telephone conversation with Jeremy Montrose on January 23,
2004. A copy of the notes of the discussion is attached as Exhibit E.
Section XV. - Code of Colorado Regulations - 5 CCR lfil2-22
The regulations provide that in the event the proposed faoility is located in the unincorporated area ofa county, the
Code ofRegulations requests, in 5 CCR lwz-n.4Q)(b), the County provide the following:
(b) County ifthe proposed facility is located in the unincorporated area ofa county. The county, through
its commissioners or its designee, is requested to review and comment upon the relationsliip of the
treatment works to the local long-range comprehensive plan for the area as it affectsl. water quality,
2. proposed site location alternatives inoluding the location with respect to the flood plain, and3. capacity to serve the planned development
compliance with the code of colorado Regulations - 5 ccR 1002-22.(2)Cb)
The Applicants have addressed the issues of water quality, flood plain and WWTF capacity in the Site
fuplication as foltows:
l. Thetreatment works will be designed to comply with the water quality requirements of thePreliminarygmuent ur*s as estautisnea (ettached as
Exhibit *A").
2. H'P Geotech conducted a "subsoil Study for Foundation Desigr- Proposed Waste Water Treatment Site.
Lot l, The Rapids on the Colorado, Counlr Road 335, Garfield County, Colorado" in order to test the soils
and establish foundation recommendations for construction ofthe WWTF.
3. The building envelope for the WWTF has been certified by Peter Belau. Enartectl an engineer licensed in
the State of Colorado, as being outside the 100-year flood plain. @eference Appendix *I' of the Site
Location Application.
i
4. ldartin / Martin Consulting Engineers has prepared the Site Location Application and Engineering Report
and wilt design the waste water treatment facility in accordance with the design.criteria provided bf the
Colorado Department ofPublic Health and Environment.
Section XVI
Legol Description of the property proposed to be seryed by the WWTF is provided as Attachment "P'.
Section XYII.
Memorandum of Understanding - Town ofNew Castle and Applicants is attached as Exhibit "D"
Section XVI[.
Site Location Application Presentation to Garfield County BOCC (Exhibit *r')
WWTF Addedum - WQCD Final.doc 6nn5
EXHIBM *A"
STATE OF COLOTUDO
Bill Owens, Governor
Douglas H. Benevento, Executive Director
Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado
43oO Cherry Creek Dr. S, laboratory SeMces Dlvlsion
Denvel Colorado80246.1530 8100 Lowry Blvd.
Phone (303) 692-2000
TDD Une (303) 691.7700
Located ln Glendale, Colorado
http://!vww.cdphe.stato.co. us
Denver, Colorado 80230€928
(303) 6s2-3090 Colorado DeDartment
ofPubtctleakh
andEnvironment
January 12,2004
Gene Hilton
The Rapids Development Corporation
2102 West Arapahoe Drive
Littleton, CO 80120-3008
Re: Preliminary Effluent Limits
The Rapids on the Colorado WWTF
Garfield County
Dear Mr. flilton:
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division,
has completed your request for preliminary eflluent limits (PELs) for the proposed The Rapids
on the Colorado wastewater treatrnent facilily (WWTF). Your current proposal is for a WWTF
with a hydraulic design capacity of 0.060 million gallons per day (MGD).
This proposed facility would discharge into the Colorado River in the SW l/4, Section 4, T6.9,
R91W; latitude 39o 33' 04n North, longitude l07o 34' 11" West; approximately 2 miles west of
New Castle, CO. This portion of the Colorado River is identified as stream segment
COLCLC0I, which means the Lower Colorado River Basin, Lower Colorado River Sub basin,
Stream Segment 01. This sEeam segment is composed of the'Mainstem of Colorado River
from the confluence with the Roaring Fork River to immediately below the confluence with
Parachute Creek." These identifications are found in the Classifications and Numeric Standat'ds
for Lower Colorado River Basin. ,
Effluent limits for specific constituents are based on the t1rye of permit a facility will require after
construction. The Rapids on the Colorado WWTF, with its proposed hydraulic design capacity
of 0.060 MGD, may be covered by a general permit.
The preliminary effluent limitations were developed for The Rapids on the Colorado WWTF
based on effluent limits established in the Regulations for Effluent Limitations for a WWTF
consisting of a mechanical wastewater treatment process, as well as the water quality-based
effluent lirnits necessary for protection of the water quality of the Colorado River. A PELs
evaluation is attached to document the findings and decisions that were used to derive the PELs
in Table 1.
its for to the Colorado River
BODs(me/l)45 (7-day average), 30 (30-dav average)
BOD1(% removal)85 (30-day average)
TSS, mechanical plant (me/l)45 (7-day average), 30 (30-dav average)
ISS, mechanical plant (% removal)85 (30-day average)
Oil and Grease (ms/l)l0 (maximum)
pH (s.u.)6. 5-9. 0 (minimurn-maximum)
Fecal Coliform (#/100 ml)12000 (7 -day average), 6000 (30-dav averase)
Table I
Proposed The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF
Preliniinary Efllu,ent Lin
Note that limitations for ammonia were determined to not be necessary for this facility. Total
Ammonia monitoring may be included in the permit as an indicator of plant operations.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (303) 692-3524.
Sincepely,
Permits Unit, Water Quality Protection Section
Water Quality Conhol Division
cc: Tom Bennett, WQCD
Dwain Watson, WQCD
Roger H. Smades, P.8., MartinArlartin, 12499 West Colfax, Lakewood, CO 80215
LynnKimble, P.E.
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF Preliminary Effluent Limits PEl-Garfield County
Pnnr,n mr.q,Ry EFTLLTENT Lnnrs
rm Cor,oRADo RrYrn
TM RAUDS DEYELOPMENT CONTON TTOX WWTF
Table I
Assessment Su
Name of Facility The Raoids Development Comoration WWTF
CDPS Number CO-PEL
WBID - Stream
Segpent
Iower Colorado River Basiru l.ower Colorado River Sub-basin,
Stream Segment 01: Mainstem of Colorado River from the confluence
with the Roaring Fork fuver to immediately below the confluence
with Parachute Creek.
COLCLCOl
Classifications Cold Water Aquatic Life Class I
Class la Existing Primary Contact Recreation
Agriculture
Water Supolv
Desieuration Undesipnated
I. Introduction
The preliminary effluent limits (PELs) evaluation of the Colorado River near The Rapids
Development Corporation WastewaterTreatrnent Facility(WWTF) was developed forthe Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division (WQCD).
The evaluation was conducted to facilitate issuance of PELs for The Rapids Development
Corporation WWTF for pollutants foirnd to be of concem
Figure I on the following page contains a map of the study area evaluated as part of this PEL.
-o'
The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF will discharge to the Colorado River. The Rapids
Development Corporation is planning a new residential development west of the Town of New
Castle named The Rapids on the Colorado. A mechanical WWTF with a design flow of0.060 MGD
will serve this development.
The ratio of the low flow of the Colorado River to The Rapids Development Corporation WIJ/TF
design flow is 11,247:1. Because of the large flow in the Colorado River, nearby upstream and
downstream facilities would have little if any impact on the assimilative capacities available to The
Rapids Development Corporation WWTF. Analyses thus indicate that assimilative capacities are
very large.
Information used in this assessment includes data gathered from The Rapids Development
Corp6ration, the WQCD, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS), and the U.S. Census Bureau TIGER Mapping Service. The data used in the
assessment consist of the best information available at the time of preparation of this PELs analysis.
Page I of14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF Preliminary Effluent Limits PEl-Garfield County
Figure A-1
Study Area
Town ofNew
wwTF, co-00404't9
lnterstate
Riverbend
Subdivision
W'WTF,
The Rapids
Development
\C:PO:,iONWWTF
LEGEND
-f,sunty
m Hl I ltary Arean LekerPondlocean E Natlonal Park
P
usGS 09085100,
miles upstream
12
-
$f,rggf,
-
fxp;^gsstfBy
I Other ParkI Schoo I
Source: US Census Tiger
Mapping Service
-Highway
l-]C|ty
-
(snnsgt,gp re6unty
E stream .o.o .o.E ^1.0 .1.8 -2.omif:#;":-',:,T::","ffiil1"' t
II. Water Quatity
The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF will discharge to the Water Body Identification
(WBID) stream segment COLCLC01, which means the Lower Colorado River Basin, Lower
Colorado River Sub-basin, Stream Segment 01. This segment is composed of the "Mainstem of
Colorado River from the confluence with the Roaring Fork River io immediately below the
confluence with Parachute Creek." Stream segment COLCLC01. is classified for Cold Water
Aquatic Life Class l, Class la Existing Primary Contact Recreation, Agriculture, and Water Supply.
Numeric standards are developed on a basin-specific basis and are adopted for particular stream
segments by the Water Quality Control Commission. To simplify the listing ofthe segment-specific
standards, many of the aquatic life standards are contained in a table at the beginning of each chapter
of the regulations. The standards in Table 2havebeen assigned to stream segment COLCLC0I in
accordance with the Clasit/ications and Numeric Standids for Lower C\brado River Basin,
Page2 of 14
Table 2
In-stream Standards for Stream Sesment COLCLC01
Fhusicol ord Biolosfcill
Dissolved Oxveen (DO):6 me/L minimum O g1e/|, minimum during spawning)
pH=6.5-9su
Fecal Coliform= 200 colmiedl00 ml
InorytW
Un-ionized ammonia aqrte = TVS
Un-ionized ammo,nia chronic : 0.02 me/l
Chlorine aolte : 0.019 msn
Chlorine chronic = 0.011 m/l
Free Cvanide asute = 0.005 me/l
Sulfide chronic = 0.002 me/l
Boron chronic = 0.75 me/l
Nitrite = 0.05 ms/l
Nitrate: l0 ms/l
Chloride chronic :250 mell
Sulfate chronic : 250 msll
Metols
Total Recoverable Arsenic acute:50 ue/l
Dissolved Cadmium acute for trout and Dissolved Cadmium chronic : TVS
Total Recoverable Trivale,nt Chromium acute = 50 uell
Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium acute and chronic : TVS
Dissolved Coooer acute and chronic: TVS
Dissolved Iron chronic = 300 us/l
Total Recoverable kon chronic: 1000 us/l
Dissolved Lead acute and chronic = TVS
Dissolved Mansanese chronic = 50 ue/l
Dissolved Manganese acrrte: TVS
Total Mercury chronic = 0.01 us/l
Dissolved Nickel acute and chronic = TVS
Dissolved Selenium acute and chronic = TVS
Dissolved Silver acute and Dissolved Silver chronic for trout = TVS
Dissolved Zinc acute and chronic = TVS'
effective January 20,2004. Because this WWTF has not yet been constructed, this soon to be
effective version of the Classifications and Standards document is being followed.
Standards for metals are generally shown in the regulations as Table Value Standards (TVS), and
these often must be derived from equations that depend on the receiving stream hardness or species
of fish present. Ttre Classification and Numeric Standards documents for each basin include a
specification for appropriate hardness values to be used. Specifically, the regulations state that:
The hardness values used in calculating the appropriate metal standard should be based
on the lowerglyoconfidence limit ofthe mean hardness value at the periodic low flow
I criteria as determined from a regression analysis of site-specific data. Where
insufficient site-qpecific data exists to define the meanhardness value at the periodic
low flow criteria, representative regional data shall be used to perform the regression
Page 3 of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF Preliminary Effluent Limits PELGarfield County
analysis. Where a regression analysis is not appropriate, a site-specific method should
be used.
Hardness data for the Colorado River near the proposed point of discharge of The Rapids
Development Corporation WWTF were insufficient to conduct a regression analysis based on the
low flow. Therefore, the WQCD's alternative approach to calculating hardness was used, which
involves computing a mean hardness.
Themeanhardness was computed tobel93 mgll basedonsanrplingdatafromWQCDWaterQuatity
Station 000047 located on the Colorado River upstream of The Rapids Development Corporation
WWTF. This hardness value and the fomrulas contained in the TVS were used to chlculate the in-
stream water quality standards for metals, with the results shown in Table 3.
Table 3
TVS-Based Metals Water Quatity Standards For The Rapids Development Corp WWTF
Based on the Table Value Standards Contained in the Colorado Departne,nt of Public Health
and Environment Water Quality Control Commission Refllation 37
Calculated Using the Following Value for H ardness as CaCO3: 193 ms1
Parameler fn-Stream Water
O.ualitv Standard Fornula Used
Cadmiunr, Dissolved Trout 7.5 ucJl l t 3667{.041 S4ln6srdness)lte
(l' I 28Qn(hardness)>3'828)l
Chronit 3.6 uyJt t.t0l 67{.041 84ln(hardness)l1s
(0'78520ncnrtuess)>2'715I
Hexavalent C-tromiunr,Acute 16 nsll Nurrric strndards providd, formla not applicable
Dissolved Chronic 11 usl Nunsic standards provido( fcrrula not applicable
Copper, Dissolved
' Acute 25 u;EA , (0.%22(ln0uercssll.7408)
Chronic 16 ue/l , (0.85a5Qn0ardness)>1.7 4281
Lead, Dissolved Acute 131 ue/l 11.46203 4.1 4571 2ln0urdrcss)lt,
(l'273(ln(turdness)!l'a6)l
Chronic 5.1 ugll U.46203 4.1 457t ztn(urares)lte ( I'2730n(tnrdncss)H'705)l
Manganese Acute 3717 tusJl , (0.3 3 3 I (ln(harercss)')+6.467 6)
Ctronic 2054 ue/l e (0.333 I (Hhadness)F5.8743)
Nickel, Dissolved Acute 817 usl), (0.8a@nnhoslr2.253)
Chronic 9l wA , @.8a604nr&ess)F0.055a)
Seleniunu Dissolved Acute 18 us/l Nunrric standards mo,id, fcm,rla not arolicable
Chronic 4.6 rus.fr Nunrric strndards providod, fonrula not aDplicablc
Silver, Dissolved Acute 6.3 rue/,y
"(1.720n(hrrew))a.s2l
Trout 0.23 wA , ( l.720n0urdness)Fl 0.5 I )
Zinc,'Dissolved Acute 205 us4 A
(0.84730(hreross))+0.86 I 8)
Chronic 206 us,A e
(0.8473048rdn€ss}I0.8699)
Page 4 of 14
Ambient Water Oualitv
@ient water quality based on a variety of statistical methods as prescribed in
Section 31.8(2XaXD and 31.8(2)OXiXB) of the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment Water euality Conrroil Commission Regulation No. 31. Ambient water quality is
evaluated in this pEG analysis for use in determining assimilative capacities and in completing
antidegradation reviews for pollutants of concem.
To conduct an assessment of the anrbient water quallty upstream of fire Rapids Development
Corporation WWTR data were gathered from WQCD water quahty station 000047 located
uppid*i-"tay 3 miles upsteam from the proposed facility. Data were available for a period of
record from Sctober 199-5 through Dece,nlber 1999. A summary of these data is prese,lrted in Table
4.
Table 4
Ambient Water Quality for thg-Qglo4do River
barameter
Nunber
of
Samples
1sth
Percentile
5Oth
Percentile
8Sth
Percentile Mean
Chroitc
Streom
Standqd Notes
femo (oC)50 1.9 7.7 15 8.2 2A
DO (mp/l)48 9.2 ll 13 ll
oH (su)41 8.2 8:,4 8.6 8.3 6.5-9
Fecal Coliform (#/10O
ml)44 3 23 gt 20 I
Ilardness (mfl
l-af'61\7(t2c 205 240 t93
As. Trec (us/l)IJ 0 c 0 0.02't Nrq 2
Cd- Dis (ue^)49 0 c 0 0 3.6 2
Cu- Dis (ue/l)49 0 (0 0.42 t6 I
Fe. Dis (usll)9 5.0 27 36 29 300
Fe. Trec (ue/l)49 5l r20 726 562 1000
Pb. Dis (ue/l)49 0 0 0 0.073 5.1 2
!vIn. Dis (ue/l)49 6.0 9.0 t4 8.9 50
lle. Trec (ug/l)2Q 0 0 c 0 NA 2
le. Dis (udl)48 0 0 1.0 0.34 4.6 2
A,e. Dis (us/l)34 0 0 0 0 0.23 2
h. Dis (usn)49 0 0 22 9.9 204 2
Julfate (mgll)49 43 92 t20 8?250
NitatelNitrite (meA)49 0 0 0.10 0.039 NA 2
NH, Tot(mg/l)49 0 0 0 0.008(NA 2
!IH. Unionized (mgll)26 0.0030 0.005c 0.010 0.0062 0.02
ISS (men)26 0 0 59 3(NA 2
Notc l : Tlrc calcllated npan is the geurrcric nran. Notc that for sumrnarizatior purpooes, thc valuc of orc was used uficrc tlrcrc wrs no detoclabl
rrDuntbccause 260 cannotbo uscd tocolctlrE thc gorpEic
{"" /, wl-t *,rpta rwults wErc bctow dacction levcls, thc valuc of zao wrs uscd in accodancc with the CO wQCDb stdd.rd rmrooch fo
unrmrization and avcracinr DurDos6.
Page 5 of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF PreliminaryEffluent Limits PELGarfield Couuty
III. Water Quantity
The Colorado Regulations speciff the use of low flow conditions when establishing water quatity
based effluent limitations, specifically the acute and chronic low flows. The acute low flow, referred
to as 1E3, represents the one-day low flow recurring in a three-year interval. The chronic low flow,
30E3, represents the 30-day average low flow recurring in a three-year interval.
Low Flow Analvsis
To determinethelow flows availableto TheRapidsDevelopment CorporationWWTF,USGS gage
statioh 09085100 (Colorado River below Glenwood Springs, CO) was used. This gage rt"tiJ"
provides a conservative analysis ofthe low flows available to The Rapids Development Corporation
WWTF because additional streams add flow to the Colorado River below the location of the gage
station. A conservative anallcis is adequate for this WQA because the process required to adJ the
additional flows to reflect ihe actual low flow available to the facilitywould be resource intensive
and would not change the outcome of this analpis.
Daily flows from the USGS Gage Station 09085 100 (Colorado Riverbelow Glenwood Springs, CO)
werdbbtained and the annual 1E3 and 30E3 low flows were calculated using U.S. Envirormrelrtal
Protection Agency @PA) DFLOW software. The output from DFLOW proviaes calculated acute
and chronic lpw flows for each month. ,,
Flow data from Octob er 1,1992 through September 3},z\O2,were available from the gage station.
The gage station and time frames were deemed the most accurate and representative ofcurrent flows
and were therefore used in this analysis. '
Based on the low flow analysis described previously the upstream low flows available to The Rapids
Development Corporation W'WTF were calculated and are presented in Table 5.
Table 5
Low Flows for the Coloqado River atI[q Rapids Development Corporation WWTF
Low Flow
(cfs)Annual Ian Feb Mar Apr May fun ful Aug sep Oct Nov Dec
rE3
Acute 875 875 879 875 I 109 t75t 1597 l4ll 1250 1081 l02t 875 898
30E3
Chronic 1046 1046 1046 1046 I 109 1870 1597 1467 1250 1250 1347 1050 1050
During the months of April, June, and August, the acute low flow calculated by DFLOW exceeded
the chronic low flow. In accordance with WQCD standard procedures, the acute low flow was thus
set equal to the chronic low flow for these months.
Page 6 of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF PreliminaryEffluent Limits PELGarfield County
fV. Technical Analysis
In-stream background data and low flows evaluated in Sections tr and III are ultimately used to
determine the assimilative capacity ofthe Colorado River near The Rapids Development Corporation
WWTF for pollutants ofconcem. For all parameters except ammonia, it is the WQCD's approach to
conduct a technical analpis of stream assimilation capacity uslng the lowest of the monthly low
flows (referred to as the annual low flow) as calculated in the low flow analysis. For ammonia, it is
the standard proced-ure of the WQCD to determine assimilative capacities for each month using the
monthly low flows calculated in the low flow analysis, as the regulations allow the use of seasonal
flows when establishing assimilative capacities.
I
The WQCD's standard analpis consists of steady-state, mass-balance calculations for most
pollutants and modeling for pollutants such as anrmonia The mass-balance equation is used by the
WQCDto calculate themaximum allowable concentationofpollutantsintheefflue,lrt, andaccormts
for the upsheam conce,lrtration of a pollutant at the existing quality, critical low flow (minimal
dilution), eflluent flow and the water quality standard. The mass-balance equation is expressed as:
{ Mz=ry
Where,
.12.:Average daily effluent flow (design capacity)
' Qt: Downstreaur flow (Or + Qz)
Mr :In-steam background pollutant concentrations at the existing quality
Mz : Calculated maximum allowable effluent pollutant concentration
Mt:Maximum allowable in-stream pollutant concenhation (water qualitystandards)
The upstream backgroundpollutant concentrations usedinthemass-balanceequationwill varybased
on the regulatory definition of existing ambient water quality. For most pollutants, existing quality is
determined to be the 856 percentile. For metals in the total recoverable form, existing quality is
determined to be the 506 perce, rtile. For pathogens such as fecal colifonm, existing quatity is
determined to be the geomeEic mean.
For non-conservative parameters and ammoniq the mass-balance equation is not as applicable and
thus other approaches are considered where appropriate. Note that conservative pollutants are
pollutants that are modeled as if mass is conserved and there is no degradation, whereas non-
conservative pollutants degrade and sometimes are created within a receiving steam depending on
stream conditions. A more detailed discussion of the technical analysis for these parameters is
provided in the pages that follow.
Pollutants of Concern
The Sllowing pollutants were identified by the WQCD as pollutants of concern for this facility:
o BODs
o TSS
o Percent removal
PageT of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF PreliminaryEffluent Limits PEl-Garfield County
o Oil and Grease
opH
oDO
o Fecal Coliform
o Total Residual Chloriner Ammonia.
There are no in-sheam water quality standards forBODs, TSS, percent removal, and oil and grease
for the the Colorado River. Thus, assimilative capacities were not determined for ttrese pararneters
in this section and an antidegradation review for these parameters was not conducted in Section V.
fUe dvatuation ofapplicable limitations forthesepofluLnts canbe foundin Section VI, Regulatory
fuialysis.
Duringassessment ofthe facility, nearbyfacilities, andreceiving streamwaterquality,no additional
parameters were identified as pollutants of concern. It should be noted that cyanide and metals are
not evaluated as part of PELs development because it is the WQCD's approach to ensure control of
cpnide and metals through a prekeafinent program, if necessary, rather than through wastewater
treatnent at the applicant's facility.
ll
Drrring assessme,lrt ofthe facility, nearby facilities, and receiving strearn water quality, no additional
parameters were identified as pollutants of concern :. ...
The Rapids Development Corporatibn WWTF: The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF
willbelocatedinthe SW 1/4, Section4, T65,R91W; Latitude 39" 33' 04"North,longitude lO7" 34,
I 1" Wes! approximately 2 miles west ofNew Castle, CO, in Garfield County. The proposed design
capacity of the facility is 0.060 MGD (0.093 cfs). Wastewater treatment is proposed to be
accomplished using a mechanical wastewater freatnent process. The technical analyaes that follow
include assessments of the assimilative capacity based on this design capacity.
Nearbv Sources
An assessment ofnearby facilities based on EPA's Permit Compliance Sptem (PCS) database found
63 dischargers in the Garfield County area. Several facilities conducted construction-related
operations (e.g., sand and gravel mining or construction dewatering) and thus had nq pollutants of
concem in common with The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF. Other facilities were
located more than twenty miles from The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF and thus were
not considered.
o The Town ofNew Castle WWTF (CO-0040479), which discharges to the Colorado River
approximately2.S miles upsheam from TheRapids Development Corporation WWTF. This
WWTF has a design capacityof 0.20 MGD.
o Talbott Enterprises, Inc. WWTF (CO-0035815), which discharges to the Colorado River
approximately 1.5 miles upstream fromTheRapidsDevelopmeirt CorporationWWTF. This
1 WtilTF has a design capacity of 0.15 MGD.o Riverbend Subdivision WWTF (COG-584006), which discharges to the Colorado River
approximately 3.5 miles upstream from The Rapids Development Corporation W'WTF. This
WWTF has a design capacity of 0.0247 MGD.
Page I of 14
o Town of Silt WWTP (COG584046), which discharges to the Colorado River approxim.ately
6.5 miles downsteam.
The ambient water qualitybackground concentrations used in the mass-balance equation ac,count for
pollutants of concern contributed by these upsheam sources, and thus it was not necessary to model
the upsheam dischargers together with The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF when
deterrrining the available assimilative capacities in the Colorado River. Due to the distance
traveled, the significant dilution ofthe receiving sheam, and the relatively unall contibutions by the
facilities of concem, modeling downstream facilities in conjunction with The Rapids Development
Corporation WWTF was not necessary.
!
Based on available information, there is no indication that non-point sources were a significant
source ofpollutants of conce,m. Thus, non-point sources were not considered in this assessment.
p![1 Th9 pH of a strearn measures the intensityof the acidityor alkalinityof the steam. WhenpH
falls outside of the neutal rangi, it can be harmful to aquatic life. To determine assimilative
capacities ofa stream forpH, thebuffering capacityofthereceiving sheam and its interactionwith
the discharge conhibutions would need to be assessed in a complex evaluation.
s
An evaluation of pH data available for the Colorado River near the proposed The Rapids
Development Corporation WWTF found that the 156 percentile value was well above ttre minimum
in-strearn water quality standard and the 85ft percentile value was well below the maximum in-
stream water quality standard. Because only limited data are available and because arnbient water
quality data indicate ttrat no firther contols are needed to meet in-stearn pH standards, a complex
evaluation.of the assimilative capacity for pH is not warranted for this facility.
DO: The availability of dissolved oxygen in receiving steams is critical for aquatic life.
Decomposition oforganic matterand nitrificationwithin receiving streams are generallythe causes
of the depletion of DO from receiving waters.
For a non-conservative parameter like DO, a simple mass balance cannot be used to deterrrine
assimilative capacity. Instead, background DO, sheaur flow, 5daybiochemical oxygen derrand md .
ammonia loading, sheam dimensions, tenrperature, ffid estimates of effluent DO may be
incorporated into models such as the Steeter-Phelps DO model or STREAIT{DO to simulate the
impact of WWTF discharges.
An evaluation of DO data available for the Colorado River near the proposed The Rapids
Development Corporation WWTF found that the 15ft percentile value was well above the minimum
in-stearn water quality standard. Because only limited data are available and because aurbient water
quality data indicate that no firttrer confrols are needed to meet in-stream standards for DO,
modeling was not conducted as part of this evaluation and no further discussion ofDO is provided.
Chtoiine: The mass-balance equation was used to determine the assimilative capacity for chlorine.
There are no point sources discharging total residual chlorine within one mile of Ttre Rapids
Development Corporation WWTF. Because chlorine is rapidlyoxidized, in-steam levels ofresidual
Page 9 of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF PreliminaryEffluent Limits PELGarfield County
chlorine are detected only for a short distance below a source. Ambient chlorine was therefore
assumed to be zero.
Usingthe mass-balance equationprovided in thebeginningof Section IV, the acute andchronic low
flows set out in Section III, the chlorine background concenfiation ofzero as discussed above, and
the in-sheam standards for chlorine shown in Section II, assimilative capacities for chlorine were
calculated. The data used and the resulting calculations of the allowable discharge concentation,
M2,?ta set forth below.
Parameter Q r Gfs)Q z Gfs)Qt kfs)M 1 (ng/l)M j (mg/l)M 2 (mg/l)
Acutb Chlorine 875 0.093 875.093 0 0.019 179
Chronic Chlorine 1046 0.093 r046.093 0 0.011 124
Fecal Coliform: There are no point sources discharging fecal coliform within one mile of The
Rapids Development Corporation 'WW'TF. Thus, fecal coliionn assimilative capacities'were
evaluated separately.
It is &e standard approach of the WQCD to perform a mass-balance check to determine if fecal
coliltirm standards are exceeded. WQCD procedure specifies that checks are conducted using only
the cbronic low flow as set out in Section Itr. Using the mass-balance equation provided in the
beginning of Section fV, the background concentration contained in Section tr, and the in-stream
standards for fecal coliform shown in Section tr, checks for fecal coliform were conducted. Thedata
used and the resulting calculations of the allowable dischirge concentrati on, Mz,are set forth below.
Parameter Qr (ds)Q z kfs)Qt kfs)M r ft/r00
nl)
M 3 (#/r00
ml)
M 2 ft/100
tnl)
Fecal Coliform t046 0.093 1046.093 20 200 2,024.716
Ammonia: Ammonia is present in the aqueous environment in both ionized and un-ionized forms.
It is the un-ionized form which is toxic and which is addressed by water qualrty standards. The
proportion of total ammonia present in un-ionized form in the receiving skeam is a function of the
combined upstream and effluent ammonia concenfiations, and the pH and teurperature ofthe effluent
and receiving stream, combined.
The Colorado Ammonia Model (CAM) is a softrryare program designed to project the downstream
effects of ammonia and the ammonia assimilative capacities available to each discharger based on
upsfteam waterquality and effluent discharges. To develop data forthe CAM, an in-stream water
qualitystudymustbe conducted ofthe upsfieam receivingwaterconditions, particularlythepH and
corresponding temperature, over a period of at least one year.
There'were no data available for the Colorado River near The Rapids Development Corporation
WWTF that could be used as adequate input data for the CAM. Therefore, the WQCD standard
procedure is to rely on default values for the allowable chronic concentations of in-stream total
l.
Page 10 of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF Preliminary Effluent Limits PEl-Garfield County
ammonia, which are provided in the Colorado Total M*rimum Daily Load and WasteJoad Allocation
Guidance and the CDPS Summary of Rationale General Permitfor Domestic Wastentater Treatment
Facilities that Discharge to Receiving Waters with a Chronic Low Flow: Desigtt Flow Ratio of
I 00: I or Greater. Note that acute values are not provided in these sources and thus are not evaluated
as part of this assessment.
Using the mass-balance equation provided in the beginning of Section IV, the acute and chrcnic low
flows set out in Section Itr, the ammonia existing quality concentration shown in Section tr, and the
in-steam standards found in the Colorado Total Maximum Daily Load and Wasteload Allocation
Cruidonce and the CDPS Summary of Rationale Genqal Permitfor Domestic Wostett)ater Tlqtment
Facillties that Discharge to Receiving Waters with a Chronic Low Flow: Design Flow Ratio of
100:1 or Greater for Mr, assimilative capacities for chronic total anrmonia were calculated. The
data used and the resulting calculations of the allowable discharge concentatiort, M2,are contained
in Table 6.
Based on the analysis, the assimilative capacity of the receiving water is large enough to allocate a
total ammonia effIuent concentration of 30 mg/I.
V. Antidegradation Review
er rrt out in The Basic Standards and Methodologies of Surface Water,Section 31.8(2)(b), an
antidegradation analysis is required except in cases where the receiving water is designated as "[Jse
Protected." Note that "Use Protected" waters are waters "that the Commission has determined do
Table 6
Ammonia Assimilative Capaclffes for the Colorado River
at The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF
rt Desisn of 0.06 MGD (0.09i cfs)
Parameter Qr GIs)Qz GIs)Qt.Gfs)M1 M3 M2
NH3, Tot (mg/l) Jan 104(0.093 1046:093 0.008(0.70 7,784
NH3, Tot (me^) Feb 1046 0.093 1046.093 0-008c 0.60 6,659
NH3, Tot (mgfl) Mar 1046 0.093 1046.093 0.008(0.40 4,409
NH3, Tot (mgfl) Apr I 109 0.093 1109.093 0.008(0.40 4.675
NH3, Tot (men) Mat l87C 0.093 1870.093 0.008(0.30 5,E72
NH3, Tot (men) Jun t591 0.093 1597.093 0.008(0.30 5,015
NH3, Tot (mg$ Iul 1461 0.093 1467.093 0.008(0.30 4,606
NH3, Tot (me[) Aug t25C 0.093 1250.093 0.008(0.30 3.925
NH3, Tot (me/l) S€p t25C 0.093 t250.093 0.008(0.30 3.925
NH3, Tot (mgA) Oct 1341 0.093 134t.093 0.008(0.30 4,230
NH3, Tot (mg4) Nov 1050 0.093 1050.093 0.008c 0.30 3.297
NH3, Tot (mgll) Dec 1050 0.093 1050.093 0.008(0.50 5.555
Page ll of14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF PreliminaryEffluent Limits PELGarfield County
not warrant the special protection provided by the outstanding waters designation or the
antidegradation review process" as set out in Section 31.8(2Xb). The antidegradation section ofthe
regulation became effective in December 2000, and therefore antidegradation considerations are
applicable to this PELs analpis.
According to the Classifications and Numeric Standardsfor Lower Colorado River Basin,stream
segment COLCLC01 is Undesignated. Thus, an antidegradation review maybe conducted for this
segment if new or increased impacts are found to occur. However, the ratio of the flow of the
Colorado River to The Rapids Development Corporation WWTF design flow is 11,247:l at low
flows, Section 3 I .8 (3)(c) qpecifies that the discharge ofpollutants should not be considered to result
in siglrificant degradation of the reviewable waters if the flow rate is greater than 100:1 dilution at
low flow. Thus, condition 31.8(3)(c) of the regulations is met and no firther antidegradation
evaluation is necessary.
VI. Regulatory Analysis
Regulation 62, the Regutations for Efiluent Limitations,includes effluent limitations that apply to all
discharges of wastewater to State waters, with the exception of storm water and agnculturatietum
flow$. These regulations are applicable to the discharge-from the proposed The Rapids Development
Corporation WWTF. Table 7 contains
1
ru1nT*y of these limitations.
1 table 7
Specilic Limitations for the Discharge of Wastes
Parometer 7-Day Averoge 30-Doy Average fnstantaneous
Maximum
BODs 45 mp/l 30 mp/l NA
TSS. mechanical olant 45 ms/l 30 me/l NA
TSS, aerated lagoon 110 me/l 75msll NA
TSS. non-aerated laeoon 160ms/l 105 mell NA
BODs PercentRemoval 8s%
TSS Percent Removal 85%
Total Residual Chlorine 0.5 mefl
pH 6.0-9.0 su ranse
oil and Grease l0 mp/l
Note that the TSS limitations shown above varybased on the t5pe ofwastewatertreatne,lrtprocesses
used at the facility. T\e Regulations for Effluent Limitations waive the 85 percent removal
requirements for TSS where waste stabilization ponds, both aerated and non-aerated, are used as the
principal process for treating domestic wastes.
Section 62.4(l) of the Regulationsfor Effluent Limitationsalso indicates that numeric limitations for
fecal toliform shall be determined. The State has developed the Procedurefor Selection of Fecal .
Colifonn Limitations Permit Conditions that specifies a 30-dayaverage limit of 6,000 colonies per
100 ml and a 7-day average limit of 12,000 colonies per 100 ml when the ratio of the receiving
sheam flow to design flow is greater than ten to one. The Pro cedurefor Selection of Fecal Colifurm
Page 12 of 14
The Rapids Development Corp. WWTF Preliminary EfIluent Limits PELGarfield County
Limitations Permit Conditions also specifies that the 7-day average limit must be calculated as two
times the 30-day average limit.
VII. Preliminary Effluent Limits
The potential PEI^s reflected in Table 8 include the consideration of the following:
r Assimilative capacities as discussed in the technical analysis contained in Section IV
o Effluent limits prescribed by the regulations based on the regulatory analpis provided in
SectionM.
A detbrmination ofwhich PELs ultimately apply will be depe,nde,nt on decisions made by The Rapids
Development Corporation W'WTF.
Table 8
Proposed The Rapids Development Corporation TWYTF
Preliminarv EffIuent Limits for Discharse to the Colorado River
BODs(meA)45 (74av avqaee). 30 (30day average)
BODI(Yo removal)85 (3Gdav averaee)
ISS.| hechanical plant (mp/l)45 (7-dav averagc), 30 (3Gday average)
TSS, mechanical plant (% removal)85 (3Gdayaverage)
Oil and Grease (mp/l)l0 (maximum)
pH (s.u.)6. 5-9.0 (rninirnurn-Ppximurt)
Fecal Coliform (#/1 0O ml)l20{JO 04av average). 60fi) (3Gdav average)
Note that limitations for anrmonia were not necessary for this facility because the assimilative
capacity of the receiving wate,r, as discussed in Section fV, is large enough to establish total
asrmonia eflluent concenhations at 30 mgfi. Because teated sanitary sewage effluent is not
expected to have a total amrnonia concentration greater than 30 mgA, no additional allocations were
determined as per WQCD procedure.
YIIL References
Procedurefor Setection of Fecal Cotiform Limitations Permit Conditions, CDPIIE, WQCD,
April 7,1976.
Colorado Total Macimum Daily Load and Wasteload Allocation Guidance, CDPEIF,, WQCD,
Nove,rnber 1991.
Classifications and Numeric Standards for Lower Colorado River Basin, Regalation No. 37,
CDPHE, WQCC, E{fective January 20,2004.
The basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water, Regulation 3/, CDPtm, WQCC,
Effective October 30, 2001.
Page l3 of14
The Rapids Devblopment Corp. WWTF Preliminary Effluent Limits PEl-Garfield County
CDPS Summary of Rationale General Permitfor Domestic Wastaryater Treatment Facilities that
Discharge to Receiving Waters with a Chronic Low Flow: Design Flow Ratio of 100: I or Greater,
CDPS Permit COG-584000, Statewide, CDPHE, WeCD, September 14,lgg4.
Antidegradation Significance Determinationfor New or Increased Water Quality Impacts,
Procedural Gtidance, CDPHE, WQCD, December 2001.
Memorandum Re: First Update to Guidance Yersion 1.0,CDPEIB, WQCD, April 23,2002.
t
Page 14 of 14
t:t
it
t
t
It
Ir
\
[-
'i lilEryriff$
ca-
Sp
EEIE
i;lg
EII E
SF
eE
:t
uli!!!E
!
T
E
F!
EIx
td
ta
t
Eg
The BAPIDS on the COLOBADO
Planned Unlt Development
6l^/ETarLI 6t A tl
F8, g.ru 3:Z4Pf''l 97?g76,?937 NU. U/41 lJ. L
EXEIBIT'6C"
tEt Na ?tl Etacat / P.O. tos ?O / 8[t, CO Ot6ti2ttouq W&ET&2353 / Pa:: 920-8z{d-l?;gg?
Fobruary 9,2W
Gadeld County Buildine aad Planning- Atta: Mr.l"Ia*Bcan, Dirccor. 1OE 8a Strec& Suic 201
Glcawood Spriugs, CO 81601
DcarMark
Thank you for discrssiag wi& mc thc projcct known as "Ttre Ratrfds", a proposcd
subdivision within GarEeId Comry. I undentaod thu tbe project is platad for thirry-
trec (33) units currently, and *rat the ryplicant" Mr. Gcrrc lilltoo, wishes to inoeue the'dcnsity.
IvIr. Gcac lliltou and [V&, Russell Talboa approached $e Towu rcgardiag potcotial
auactrmeot to thi Towals westcwarer collcaioo ard ucampor systcru, receutly extcoded
by the R+2 School District to thc CoaI Ridgc Ifigh Sctrool, a nile and a half east of Silt,
along State Ifigbway 6. Mr. Hiltou explained ttrat the sewcr Iinc could bc +liened along
thc Iower Caca,ls Vdley Ditch, south of Ilghway6, uutil a point jrw soudr of.the hieh
school propgrty, a dsance of 35 milcs. He claimed &at thcrc wele ev€o grants availibie
fo ttri Torrt to apply foriu assistiag wit this tlpe of cmstnrction of a regooal '
westcwat s s]srern. Itdr- IIiIton also sutcd that tbc &vclopmcats nra wirhiu fivc (5) oilcs
&om dre SiIt Tocrn liuis. Finally, Mr. Ifiltou clatmed that the Apple Tree Mobile llome
Park corild also bo arachcd to rhc scwcliac, and tbc two projccts could pay theToua
upfront for &ar capaciry witria ur systcm 6u StillwauPIJD had nor )Er fulfilled.
Aftcrrcadinglvtr.IIlton's rcport on thc contcor of this uecting, there are someitems
that IvIr. IIiIoa misiatcrpted TtreToua staffinformedlvlr. IfiIton andMr. Talbon ttrat
tho cost of an out-of-towu sewer tap ie $IOJ@ ftiplc tha uorcral.op fec of $31500, rr9r
. adviscd Mr. Iflton and tvfr. Tdboa that &g cunrBnt raf for ia-toual wsstewarcr scrvicr is
tj9.22 permonth, and escalates at a ratc af 6% ou Iaauary l, 2004 and on Iaruary 1,
2005, and tren 3% eachYogrthcreafrcr, Oit-of-tOwn wastcwatsrserrrice is doubie the
in-oum rare,not uipla
" Suff mentioned that there was I cost rtcovlry to the Scbool Disrict for thc pipo thar thc
Discrict is installiag (1"5 railcs, uot 3.5 milcs), and ttru thc cost rccovQry w* based pn
.' .
,
tbc aaouat of capaciry that cach proposed dcvelopment would, uq in tsnos of tbc inpaot
FEG, g,zw 3:zsPt'l E7@76?sI37 ru.U.'4 7.4
of tbc devclopmeotverus the size of the prpe, It is uacloar where }fr. Itrltou asivcd at
drc $35/foor tines 3.5 milos, for a total of $38'a00, siace no frgurc was ever dlscussed.
l"{r. Ifltoo sratcd thar rhc bcst location for iastallatios of a scwer liue would bc thc I,owcr
Cacnu Valley Dirch Easeoe,nt, south of State Inghway 6. Mr. Ifllton states thu t]re dirdr
corrpuly rvould not allow sewcr'lincs iu tht dirch easeme,nt, but the Tourn has oo
knowledgu tbat thc dfich coutd fo$id t]ris alignrncot. Art4 while this may be tbe best
locatim for Mr. IEltqn, it appears fron tlre Town's p4spccdve &ar relativcly few parccls
conld tsp otr, eud thcrcfora would not bc a colt cfficieut vcntrrc for rlre Town, ueaning
that the Torvr wouldbe rcsponsiblc for a lot of scwer lino with reladvely few uscrs to
hclp pay the montlrly mainrcnance bill. This alignmcat could prcscot a Erssy
maintcnancc situaEon for the Town i! hc rurt-off months, as well. Mr. Hilton indicated
that he had no dcsire to nainrain 3.5 miles of collcction main" and Silt citizeas should not
be unduly burdcocd cifier, Addirionally, tbc Towu of Silt would not likely apply for
grarts to install collectioo lincs trat would bcncfit residentisl units, as ths chance for
receiving suclr a graot would bc extrcmcly snall in light of dre current economy. Both
lvIr, Ifilron's ptcel and the Apple Trec Park arc in exccss of fiye (5) miles'ftom thc
Tocm of Silt boundarics, in most develqpcd locatioos, and littlc less than frve (5) milcs
tm ths Stillwucr PUD easrcrn cdge, altltough no utilities arc in that location and are not
proposed ia bat location for some time. t would appear that New Castlc aod these
dcvelopncuB could morc easily fon a. syobiotic relationstrip.
.Philosophicalln &e Town of SiIt iopp*. r rcgioaat wastcwatcr Eeatmcnt systcm, aud
the Torp:r qpprcciarcs the Couary's e,fforts in limiting dc,asity iu County subdivisioas ttrat
may affcct orher Town itrfra8tnrcam, such as rcads, btidges and interchangcs.
S/astcwatcr slstqns arc extremcly cxpcosivq necd rouud-the-clock ruaiutcaance and
rcquire a ccrtified qperator. The Towa of Sih would encourage further coramunicarioa
with thc dcvclo,per and the Counry regarding Ns issue.
llaok you for this oppornmity for thc Tou.n of Sitt to conment oa this projcct. Should
you have anyqucsdons, pleasc do not hcsitateto call Monday &roughFriday, from E
a.E" to5 p.n.
Srnccrely,
@@
Ianet G. Srcinbactr
Community Dcvelopmeot Director
CC: Board of llustccs; Richard J. Aluisc, Town Administrator; file
EXHIBIT O'D"
MrnaonLNDUM or UxonnsrANDrNG
/1 F. MeilaoneNDUM oF UNonnsreNowc, made this / 5r/* day of
; ' . 2005, by and among the TowN on Nrw Casnr, , municipal
corporation with its principal office at 450 West Main Street, New Castle, Colorado
81647 (hereinafter the "Town"), TEE Repnrs Dn,vnroplren-r conponqnoN, and rpr
Repps ON rm Coloneoo HoNmowlmRs AssocmnoN (the "HOA"), both Colorado
corporations having its principal office and place of business at 2102 West Arapahoe
Drive, Littleton, colorado 80 1 20-3008 (hereinafter eollectively "Rapids").
WlEREas, Rapids owns certain real property situate in the County of Garfield,
Colorado, consisting of approximately ninety-seven (97) acres, as well as the right to
acquire an adjoining parcel consisting of approximately hventy-fovr Q4) acres; and
WIEREAS, in September of lgg7, Garfield Counff approved Rapids' plat for a
subdivision comprised of thirty-three (33) single family residential lots to be known as
The Rapids on the Colorado (hereinafter the "Projecf'), which plat is recorded in the
office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado as Reception No. 513353;
and
WltERE.As, in accordance with such approval, Rapids completed the public
improvements for the contemplated subdivision, including roads, water, nafural gas,
telephone, electricity, fire protection and drainage, with sewer service to be provided by
individual sewer disposal systems; and
WtlEnr.e,s, Rapids now desires to file an application for a PUD with Garfield
County in order to replat the Project properly together with the adjoining parcel
consisting of approximately twenty-four (24) acres, or a total of one hundred twenty-one(l2l) acres, as a PUD comprised of one hundred twenty-one (121) single family
residential units; and
Wrmnnls, in order to obtain the approval of Garfield County for a PUD, the
subdivision must be serviced by a central waste water ffeatment system; and
WHEREAS, Rapids has prepared and submitted to the Garfield County Board of
County Commissioners (hereinafter the "BOCC") a site application dated December,
2003 for such a central waste water fieatment service facility (hereinafter the "Facility")
for the Project pursuant to CRS $25-8-502, et seq.; and,
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Page2
WtmnsAS, the site application for the Facility approval was sent to the Tovvn in
its capacity as a referral agency with a sewer system within three (3) miles of the Project;
and
WHEREAS, the Town expressed concerns about the site application density as
originally submitted; and
WHERBAS, Rapids amended its application to the BOCC by amendment dated
lvlarch 29,2004; and
WtunEAS, the Project is within the Town's three (3) mile planning area as set
forth in C.R.S. $31-12-105; and
WtmReAs, Rapids seeks the cooperation of the Town in its site application to the
Colorado Deparfinent of Health and Environment (hereinafter the "CDPFIE") and a
recommendation from the Town to the BOCC that they recommend to the CDPFIE that
the application be approved; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Memorandum of Understanding to
reflect certain agreements and understandings among them.
Now, Tnrnrronr, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
.contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
1. Subject to the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding, the
Town shall consent to and recommend to the BOCC that it recommend approval of the
site application for the Facility.
2. Rapids agrees that the proposal to be submitted to Garfield County for the
replatting of its entire one hundred twenty-one (121) acre parcel as referred to above as a
PUD shall not contain more than one hundred twenty-one (l2l) single family residential
units, and uses for trails, open space, roals, ponds, utility easements, water storage tanls,
waste water treatment facility, pipelines, irrigation ditches, Iines and facilities, water
wells, recreational facilities, community facilities and other uses approved by the HOA
from time to time, and shall conform substantially to the sketch plan map attached hereto
as Exhibit "A." The Town agrees that many elements of such proposed PUD, including
clustering, dedication of open space, presenring the hillside as open space and the like
New Castle-Rapids Agreement 4. I I . 2005. FinalN. C. . doc
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Page 3
are consistent with its Comprehensive Plan, although not in strict compliance with such
Plan as to density. The Town supports the PUD because of its substantial compliance
with its Comprehensive Plan as noted above, the provision for a public trail with river
access, and the provision of a waste water treatment facility with proposed use as
provided herein; provided, however, that any such support is contingent upon compliance
by Rapids with the provisions of this paragraph and, further, so long as the PUD proposal
is consistent with the following conditions:
& Rapids specifically agrees that it shall, as generally depicted on Exhibit A. attached hereto, dedicate to public use a defined trail (the "Trail"), not less than
four access points ("Access Points") between the Trail and a fifteen- foot wide
river tail ("River Trail") to and along the water line of the Colorado River, as it
may seasonally fluctuate, for fishing and other non-commercial and non-hunting
recreational purposes during a time period commencing thirly (30) minutes before
sunrise and ending thirty (30) minutes after sunset, and shalt provide nine (9)
public parking spaces within the Project for such purposes. Maintenance and
repair of the Trail, Access Trail, River Trail and the public parking area shall be
the responsibility of the HOA.
It is specifically agreed that the Trail shall be located a minimum
of ten (10) feet from the rear lot lines of the residential lots in the Project.
Fences, not higher than five (5) feet, may be constructed by the HOA and/or lot
owners along the lot lines abutting the Trail. Fences not in excess of four (a) feet
in height may be constructed outside individual lot lines within the dedicated
open space to protect landscape features, provided that such fences in the open
space do nOt unreasonably impede public access. The Trail shall be not less than
six (6) feet wide, shall be initially composed of four (4) inch compacted road
base, and may be modified by the HOA to provide a hardened surface to
encourage use by the elderly and those who are confined to a wheelchair.
The foregoing Trail, Fishing Trail and Access Points shall be
shown on the final plat with appropriate plat notes.
b. As part of the PUD approval, Rapids specifically agrees that the open
space fract ("Open Space Tract") Iocated south of County Road 335 and west of
County Road 312 shall remain as open space in perpetuity. The Town and Rapids
acknowledge that the following uses shall be allowed on the open space tract:
New Castle-Rapids Agreement 4. I I . 2005.FinalN. C.RevA. doc
Memorandum of Understanding
by and arnong Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Page 4
(1) Leases, agreements, reservations, easements and rights of way of
record.
(2) Additional water well(s) and water storage faoilities and
equipment for Rapids, including access, utilities and W-3262
underground water au$nentation plan pipetine and associated
confiols and equipment.
(3) Existing access roads
Nothing herein shall be deemed to affect the rights of third parties who have
easements or reserved rights concerning the open space tract.
The foregoing Open Space Tract shall be shown on the final plat with appropriate
plat notes.
c. The parties agree that all road impact fees in excess of those already
expended by Rapids shall, unless othenuise directed by the BOCC, be apptied to
additional improvements to County Road 335. It is further agreed that Rapids
shall propose to the BOCC that the balance of the Road Impact Fees to be paid by
Rapids shall be utilized for improvements to CR 335 based upon
recommendations to be made jointly by engineers representing the Rapids, the
Town and Garfield County.
The parties specifically acknowledge that Rapids has previously expended the
sum of One Hundred Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Six Dollars (S118,206.00)
as impact fees, prior to adjustnent for inflation, for the 33 approved existing lots,
which funds were used to reconstruct and pave a one-half mile section of CR 335
adjacent to The Rapids on the Colorado subdivision, and that no traffic impact
fees shall be due for 33 of the proposed 121 lots.
d. The parties acknowledge that the waste water treatment facility site
provided within the Project is suflicient in size to accommodate wastewater
treatment for approximately one hundred (100) acres of privately owned land
adjacent to the Project and Apple Tree Mobile Home Park. Any expansion of the
proposed Facility is dependent upon approval of an application to expand the
facility by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment based
upon various factors, including but not limited to comments from adjacent
New Castle-Rapids Agreement 4. I I .2005.FinalN.C..doc
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
Page 5
municipalities, residents and the recommendation by the Board of County
Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado. In the event such an expansion is
approved by the State of Colorado, a service contract to provide waste water
treatment to properties located south of the Colorado River and outside the
Project would require such properties proposed to be served to provide:
(l) Liability insurance for potential damages caused by offsite pollutants
introduced into the plant system.
(2) An agreement to hold Rapids harmless for all costs or liability
resulting from damages associated with facilities or services for waste
water teatment originating from properties not owned or acquired by
Rapids.
(3) cash payments shall be made in advance for all expansion expenses to
be incurred by Rapids, its successors or assigns, including but not
limited to engineering and legal fees, administrative costs, utility
modifications, modifications to the existing plant necessitated by the
expansion, and expenses of any kind or nature associated with the
expansion. It is specifically acknowledged that the expenses of
expansion to provide service to properties outside the Project shall
include any and all orremrns by subcontractors or consultants;
(4) An agreement that provides that maintenance, repair and replacement
of all collector lines, lateral lines and associated facilities within
adjacent properties or within Apple Tree Mobile Home park shall be
the sole responsibility of the adjacent property owners or of Apple
ffi#;*l;Xlme Park, unless otherwise agreed by Rapids in the
(5) Tap fees and services charges for wastewater treatment provided to
properties outside the Project (Apple Tree, Mountain Shadows and
adjacent properties) shall be at rates acceptable to both parties.
Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, no connection
to the Facility by any third parly shall be permitted without the written
consent of the Town, provided however, that such consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld if the proposed land use is consistent with the
Nerv Castle-Rapids Agreemenl 4. I I . 2005.FinalN. C.. doc
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeov.rners Association
Page 6
Comprehensive Plan for the Town.
4. Noncn. All notices required or appropriate under this Agreement shall be
in writing and shall be hand delivered or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested,
postage prepaid, to the addresses of the parties herein set forth. All notices so given shall
be considered effective swenty-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States lvlail
with the proper address as set forth below. Either party by notice so given may change
the address to which future notices shall be sent.
Notice to the Town:Town ofNewCastle
450 West lvlain Street
New Castle, Colorado 81647
The Rapids Development Corporation
2 102 West Arapahoe Drive
Littleton, Colorado 80 I 20-3008
Notice to Rapids:
Assn.
Notice to the HOA: The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners
2102 West Arapahoe Drive
Littletorl Colorado 80 I 20-3008
5. Fnter Acnrmmur. This Agreement supersedes and controls all prior
written and oral agreements and representations of the parties, and is the total integrated
agreement among the parties.
6. MoomcerroNs. This Agreement shall not be amended or modifie4
except by subsequent written agreement of the parties.
7. ItITERpRBTenoN. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with
the law of the State of Colorado.
8. TrnrvrwnrroN. If the Rapids has not obtained final approval from
Garfield County of the replatting of the proposed one hundred twenty-one (l2l) aires
parcel into at least 121 residential lots as a PUD within two (2) years from the date of this
Memorandum of Understanding, then this Memorandum of Understanding shall
terminate and its provisions be rendered null and void.
New Castle'Rapids Agreement 4. I I .2005.FinalN. C.. doc
Memorandum of Understanding
by and among Town of New Castle,
The Rapids Development Corporation and
The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association
PageT
IN Wrnmss Wlmntrotr', the parties hereto have
Memorandum of understanding on the day and year first above written.
'towN oF NEw Casfl,s
Rapros ON Coroneoo
executed this
TIIBTIft
Gene R. Hilton, President
New Castle-Rapids Agreement 4. I I .2005.FinalN.C..doc
I
I
I
t_
-\
ili FI
IEi i[lri lllrl !
!-i
lEt:!It|<
-iti
l!
Ii
,r
r!
4!
1[
%L'tu-/,
. tt
tl
[t-r l
l-J-r----J I L
[=-
'i lilE
ii'E iiirB
$j'Eu
liilil!
Caq
\sr*:q' RFq
Huo h
Es! H
IEa g
B$I H
ETH E
SFR]Bloot't(o'
ffiE
r!; t!
!:ii
tnx
ts
L
E
IIttThe RAPIDS on the COLORADO
Planned Unlt Developmentcr/rTnl.l rll /itl
MARTIN / MARTIN
OONTULTINB ENBINEER!
Dlscusslon:
Dwain had the following preliminary comments regarding the Site Application submitted to him earlier this week.
l. He fust requested that I send him the PEIs which I had received fiom the Permits Unit this week I faxed
them to him this aftemoon.
2. He requested a drawing which shows the. floodplain boundary clearly dlong with the precise location of the
wasteu/ater teament facil ity.
3. He requested a letter of cnedit certiffing that the Rapids Development Corporation has the necessaq/ funds
to constnrct the facility.
Application
5. Hl-asked how close the nearest residence will be located to the treatnent facility, and reminded me that
. there is a 100' setback requirement assuming that the teatnent facility will be enclosed in a building. If
tbe facility is not enclosed in.a blilding the setback requirement is 1000'.6. Since the setback requirement is so great for a non-enclosed facility, the owner will almost definitely need' to cover the facility. Therefore, the costs associated with these added buildings must be added to the cost
estimates.
7, The cost for a polishing pond, filter (such as Dynasand) or emergency storage basin (as required by design
criteria 5.14.10) mustbe added to the cost estimate.
8. He stated that we should be using 350 pd/tap ratherthan 250 gpd.
9. He informed me that Silt's new borurdary lies within three miles of the Rapids site, and therefore Silt must
provide review comments on the Site Application.
10. He then informed me that full infrastructure and the Silt town boundary have been expanded to within three
miles of the Rapids site. The new Garlield County Higb Schbol to bc ialled Coal Ridge is on the south
side of the south I-70 frontage road and on the north side of the riverat Davis Point which lies at
approximately between sections l0 and I l, That means tbat he would like to see the option of
consolidation with Silt examined rnore thoroughly. The exiiting sewer line at Davis Point is 15", which. will easily accept our flows. Thc design capacity of thc Silt plant is 0.750 MGD, and they are only
operating at approximately 0.160 MGD, so there is ample capacity as wel!. Dwain also gave some new
numbers to be used in this consolidation option, which he feels are much more appropriate cost
informatiou. He stated that the forcc main can be installed for $15-20/foot, and ilrat Silt's tap fees are only
$3000/tap. This dramatically decreases the cost associatid with this consolidation option, but there is the
added cost of constucting the river crossing.
I l. He further stated that wc should work harder to convince Talbott to coordinate with us for the development
of this lift station to tie in to Silt. He stated that they are on a compliance schedule, and the re-lining'of thg
lagoons is likely going to be far rnore expensive than the Talbott's expect. Therefore, they may be morc
amenable to consolidation once they realize the extent of that cost. The lift station on our property would
possibly be ablc to take gavity flow from Talbptt and the tap fees to Silt would probably be bargained
ltc abovc is considercd concct unlcss rrsponsc to 0rc contrary ir rcscivcd within 7 dap from datc rbova
O:\SMN)El\Rrpl&\Wp\Tclcon t{l{a.doc
Call From: Dwain Watson, CDIHE Grand Juncfion
To: JeremylVlontrose
Copy To: Roger Smades
EXIJIBIT.6ED
TELEPIIONE CONVERSATTON RE CORD
Page I of2
Date lanuary 24,2004Rev
Time: 3:a5 [ am ffi pm
hoject No.: 16454.C.01
Project Title: Rapids on the Colorado
Rcvi*dOl/ilt
l?429_wcstcclq o--P.o-Boxri1500 : l*ITrd,colondo80r.,i .:. Tctcphone30343l.6100 .www.martinmartin.com
TELEPHONE C OI'TVERSATI ON REC ORD
Page2
down if;, between both entities, they were offering Silt over 500 taps. Anothel benefit to this option is that
it would take both the Rapids and Apple Tree (Talbott) out of the sewage business completely.
In summary, D-vrrain feels that we have more work to do prior to the Site-Ap being considered complete. So
hopefullylrc c* sit down and
liluss
all these items as soon as possible on Monday
JJM
Rerised I n6104 per the following:
Item lO. The Coal Ridge High School is actually on the north side of Interstate 70, but the 15" intera€Ptor is
located on the south side ofthe south fronage road.
Addition:
The Stillwater pUD, approximately 1500 taps is a development that has been placed on hold, which is partially why
the Town of Silt WWTF is currently operating so far under capacity.
Thc abovc is considcrcd conrct unlcss t€sponsc to thc contrary is roccivotl within 7 days from datc abovc.
C:lStt{ADEt \RDl&\Wp\Tolm l'2a4l.doc Rwtucd02rlt
12499 Wcst Colfax . o p.O. Box 1515CI r ..Lakcwood, Cotorado t02lJ o Tclcphone:303-431-6100 . www.msrtinmutin.com
EXEBp "p"
LEGAT DESCRIPT.ION
L2L,488 ACRE PARCEL
A tract of'Iand situated in the SE1/{SW1/rt and the S[tlltSE1/4 of Section { andthe NW1/{NE1/{ of Section 9 all in Township 5 South, Range 91 !{est of the..66P.M. being descrlbed as follows:
Beithnihg at thd'southwest corner of sald section 4; thence N 00"50'oo".w438.10 feet along the west lLne of said section rt and along the Easterly rine ofthat patcel of land described l.n Book 5?0 at page 2G6 in tfre office ot lne9?:fl9ld County Cl'erk and Reeorderi thence N 75o{3,1g" w 101.89 feet; thence N17o08r{1r' tV 115.59 feet; thence N 53o4?r08r'rf 1?7.75 feet to Lhe center of theColorado River; thence along the center of said rlver N 23o{3'15, E. jig.fO-
feet; thence N 23043'20ll E 310.00 feet; thence N 3500g,15" E ALg.25 feet;thence N 42c56'13" E 4gg;62 feet; thence N 65001r4?,, E 404.40 feet; thence N71"35112'r E 503.50 feet; thence N 84o15r20,' E 2g4.gg feet; thence S g1"33,39,E' 24'4".81'fdet; thence s 59002'{7'r E 266.82 feet; thence s-eadnz,11" E {g0.i1.feet to the wesit line of the Brannan Subdivision Exemption No. 1; thence afong-said West line and departing the center of sald Colorado River S 00"50,S4,, E520.60'feet to the Northeast Corner of that parcel descrl.bed in Book 52T at page
]11 .r Receptl.on No. 293881; thence arong thl boundary of sai- parcer s78"22'10" !'I 328.61 feet; thence s o8'{o;1.5, E {30.9? feet to the southerlyRight of gFay of, County Road No. 335; thence along said Right of way N ?Beg2,15rE' 4-10 feet; thence along a curve to the right with an aic length of 303.67feet, a radl'us of 389.99 feet, a central "nglu of 44o36'{Bi, a ctrora bearing ofs 78039''21'E, a chord tength of 296.05 feei, thence s 56o20'5G, E zgq.gz feet;
!!?n9e along a curve to the left with an arc length of 6?.52 feet,, a radius of191.32 feet, a central angle of 20c13r1S", a ctroid bearing of S 6;.2?,34;-;,-;
thord Iength of"67'.17 feet, thence departJ.ng sald Right oi w.y S 1?o{2,53, E308.48 feet; thence s L2o52r36" E 736.29 fiet; thenie arong i "urr" to therlght with an arc length of 236.48 feet, a radlus of 5118.35 feet, a central.anqrle of Z['oI2'3{,, a chord bearing of S 00c31r19n E, a chord f"i.,git-";-iii.OSfeet, thence s 11o{9'sg" l|' 1{1.56 feet; thence s g9i,30,00" r{ ii6.iz-r.;;;'--thence N 11'30'oo" vr 11so.0o feet; thence N 49.30,00, !f 39s.oo-;;;;r-IiIi." ,700{5."Oo"'I{ s?O.oo feet; thence s 29coo'oo; lt- 414.95 feet; thence s ooe14,42*E 64.14 feet; thence s 89o20'o8, ll 1308.98 feet; to the point of Beginning -
contal.ning L2L.rl88 Acres.
Silt - New Castle VicinitY MaP
fl,
sq,rcEs
li..
Janlt.'r
L{E
ORRS
iortl$t qr'
idRid.
EdFodt
a^sta
rfh4Prc
rilrEs
yOordrl..
r{.rr€Gtd-h
O,l,lCtlsfiPO!g)
drJSub
lla&116
dcrSrlE
$AlE I :53.50a
rlll
1;2!
A
Srrl.bY. F.5.urY t5,zqx f 153 Alr
l!XHr{I
wf--,*o
S
The Rapids on the Colorado
Proposed 121 Unit pUD
Cactus Valley Ditch Alignment From the
Rapids to the High School
Alignment Legend:
107036.000'wLA 107035.000'w
I tiltti-'.*
lrcJmrttr g I{n !$rrfrrxs
M9 ocrlod wilh TOPOTC O2ff12 Nrtbul Gcogrphic (rwrv.mtioarSrognphic.conutopo)
wcca, t o/v2.. ^^n. ltr
wGS84 r07033,00(
lv, Ju.wv ItG i:rrrlY55 tIIr wr1rz,2 srrE Ei:l\
11)rv1A,xJo.w
107034.000' w
z
boov(n
o\(r)
\c g
107037.000'W
4
-oo9
(Y)(n
oqr
ar)
taJX
EEI
Edlrir.i
E
ATTACHMENT 3
Site Location Application and Report
Wastewater Treatment Facility - The
Rapids on the Colorado
Prepared By Martin / Martin Consulting Engineets
ATTACHiIIENT 3
MARTI N / MARTIN
SITE LOCATION APPLICATION AND
ENGINEERING REPORT
WASTEWATE R TREATMENT FACILITY
THE MPIDS ON THE COLOMDO
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
SITE LOCATION APPLICATION AND
ENGINEEMNG REPORT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
DECEMBE& 2003
PROJECTNO. 16454.C.01
PREPARED BY:
N,IARTIN/I\4ARTIN, NC.
12499 WEST COLFN( AVENI.'E
PO BOX 151500
LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 802 15
(303) 431-6100
PREPARED FOR:
TTIE RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
2IO2 WEST ARAPAI{OE DRIVE
LITTLETON, COLORADO 8OI 2O.3OO8
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE: ROGER SI\{ADES, P.E.
EXECUTTVE SI,IMMARY
MARTINATIARTIN has been retained to prepare a "Site Location Application" and "Engineering Report"
for the Rapids Development Corporation for a proposed wastewater treatnent facility located in Garfield
County, Colorado. This new facility is required to provide cental wastewater teatnent for an approved
platted zubdivision as opposed to many individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS). The owner is in the
process of rezoning the property to PUD at two units per acre. The zoning regulations of Garfield
County, Colorado provides for the density to be increased above the underlying zoning.
The subdivision, as proposed, will consist of a total of one hundred ninety four (194) dwelling units being
constructed over a phased market demand build-out schedule. The development will not include any
commercial or industrial users to be connected to the proposed wastewater teatnent facility. The
development will be located in the SW % of Section 4 and the SE % of Section 5, T65, R9lW, 6o P.M.,
Garfi eld County, Colorado.
The Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) is the recommended wastewater teatnent process. It is proposed
that the treatnent facility will include preliminary treatnent (headworks), one SBR unit, post equalization
basur, ultra violet (UV) disinfection, and aerobic sludge holding for a design flow of 0.060 MGD at a
construction cost of approximately $600,000. The annual operating and maintenance (O&M) cost
estimate in 2003 dollars will be approximately $72,740. The generated biosolids will be hauled off-site,
for treatnent, reuse or disposal, by a state licensed contractor.
The Rapids Development Corporation will finance the constnrction ofthe wastewater teatnent facility.
Upon completion of constnrction and certification that thc facility is operating properln Rapids
Development Corporation and The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association will initiate the
formation of a special district to operate the existing Rapids water systems and the proposed wastewater
teatnent facility and will provide the annual O&M moneys required for facility operation. The Rapids
Development Corporation will hire a state certified wastewater treafinent and collection system operator
to op€rate, maintain, and manage the proposed wastewater teatnent facility. The operator will report
directly to the president of the Rapids Development Corporation rurtil the special distict is formed and in
operation.
SITE APPLICATION COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST
Cons0uction of New Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants
Name of Project Rapids on the Colorado
Appricant Name and Addres''
lifl;ii,:ff1""1Hil,:"J,;,:1:::b81i,hTi.,'il' President
consultant **: and Address: |!{il$artin Inc., Roger H. smades, principal
12499 W. Colfax, PO Box 151500, Lakewood, CO 90215
Tpe of Projecf New Wastewater Treatrnent Facility to serve the Rapids on the Colorado
G:\SMADES\RAPIDS\SIIE AP\SITE APP CHECK LIST NEw WWTF.DOC
Page I
Subdivision
Section Elements Addressed on
Submtttal Page
(Applicant)
Complete
@iviston)
22.4(r)Application submitted on proper form with
recommended action by all applicable local authorities
and planning agencies
Appendix K
22.4(t)(b)Adequate engineering report describing the proposed
new domestic wastewater treatnent plani and showing
the applicants capabilities to manage and operate the
facility over the life ofthe project. The engineering
report shall address at a minimum items i through xiii
below.'
Pagesl-8and
Appendices A0
22.4(lXbXD Service area definition including existing and projected
populatior5 site locatior5 staging or phasing
flowfloading projections, and relationship to other water
and wastewater treatnent plants in the area
Report Section
II, Pages I and 2
22.4(lXbxii)Proposed site locatioq evaluation ofalternative sites,
and evaluation of teafinent alternatives
Report Section
VIII, Page 3
22.4(l)Oxiii)Proposed effluent limitations as developed in
coordination with the Division
Report Section
III, Page 2 and
Appendix F
22.4(l)OXiv)Analysis of existing facilities within service area(s)Report Section
XlV, Page 7
22.a(l)(b)(v)Analysis of opportunities for consolidation of treatnent
worls in accordance with the provisions of 22.3(l)(c),
including those recommended in the water quality
management plan, unless the approved water quality
management plan recommends no consolidation.
Report Section
XlV, Page 7
22.4(lXbxvi)Evidence that the proposed site and facility operations
will not be adversely efrected by floodplain or other
natural hazards. Where such hazards are identified at
the selected site. the report shall describe means of
Report Section
lV, Page 2 and
Appendix I
mitigating the hazard.
22.a(lXbXvii)Evidence shall be presented in the forna ofa report
containing soils testing results and desip
recommendations and prepared by a Professional
Geologist and a Geotechnical Engineer, or by a
professional meeting the qualifications of both
Professional Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer, with
an appropriate level of experience investigating geologic
hazards, stating that the site will support the proposcd
facility.
Report Section
VII, Page 3 and
Appendix L
22.a(l)OXviii)Detailed description of selected alternatives including
legal description ofthe site, treatnent system
description, desigrr capacities, and operational staffing
needs.
Report Sections
U, Vm andXll[
Appendix C
22.4(lXbxix)kgal arrangemenb showing control of thc site for the
project life or showing the ability of the entity to acquire
the site and use it for the project life.
Report Section
)fi and
Appendix C
22.a(lXbXx)Institutional arrangements such as confrct and/or
covenant terms which will b€ finalized to pay for
acceptable waste treatment
Sewer tap fees
are outlined in
Report Section
IX, Page 5
22.a(l)OXxi)Management capabilities for controlling the wastewater
loadings within the capacity limitations of the proposed
teatsnent works, i.e., user contracts, operating
agreements, pretreatnent requirements and/or the
management capabilities to expand the facilities as
needed (subject to the appropriate, future review and
approval procedures).
Report Section
)OII, Page 7
22.a(lXbXxii)Financial system which has been developed to providc
for necessary capital and continued operation"
maintenancc, and replacement tbrougb the life of the
project This would include, for examplc, anticipated
fee and rate structure.
Report Section
)0I, Page 7
22.a(lXbXxiii)Implementation plan and schedule including estimated
constnrction time and estimated start-up date.
Report Section
XV, Page 8
22.a[Xc)Where the site application indicates that a discharge to a
ditch or other manmade conveyance structure is
contemplated for the proposed plant, or that an
easemenf right-of-way or other access onto or across
private property ofanother person may be necessary to
constuct the facility or to effectuate the discharge, the
applicant shall furnish to the Division evidence that a
notice of the intent to constnrct a new domestic
wastewater trearnent olant has been orovided to the
N/A
G:\SMADES\RAPIDS\SrIE AP\SITE APP CIIECK LIST NEW WWTF.DOC
Page2
owner ofsuch private property.
22.aQ)@\Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering repgrts by the management agency, if
different from other entities listed below
N/A
22.4(2)(b)Review cornments on the sirc application and associated
engineering reports by the county ifthe proposed facility
is located in the unincorporated area ofa county. The
county, through its cornmissioners or its desigree, is
requested to review and cornnent upon the relationship
of the Eeatment works to the local long-range
comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water
qualrty, proposed site location altenratives including the
location with respect to the flood plain, and capacity to
serve the planned development.
Appendix K
22.aQ)@)Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the city or tou,n if the proposed
facility is to be located within the bormdaries of a city or
town or within three miles of thosc boundaries if the
facility is to be located in an unincorporated area ofthe
county. The city or ton/n, through its mayor, council or
its desipee, is requested to review and comment upon
the relationship of the treatment works to the local
comprehensive plan and/or utility plan for the
community as it affects water quality, proposed site
location alternatives including the location with respect
to the flood plain, and capacity to serve the planned
development.
Appendix K
22.4(2)(d)Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the local health authority is
requested to review and comment on local lssues,
policies and/or regulations related to public health safety
and welfare as affected by the proposal.
N/d County
22.aQ)@)Review comments on the site application and associated
engineering reports by the water quality planning
agency, if designated or if such function has been
delegated by the Starc, with regard to the consistency of
the proposed treatnent plant to the water quality
management plan
N/A
22.4(3)Ifthe proposed facility will be on or adjacent to any
land owned or managed by a state or federal agency, a
copy ofthis application shall be sent to such agency.
Their review cornrnents should be included with the site
application.
N/A
22.4(6)A picture of the public notification sip.AppendixN
G:\SMADES\RAPIDS\SITE AP\SITE APP CHECK LIST NEw WWTF.DOC
Page 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L GENERAL INFORMATION A}.ID PI.]RPOSE ........1
tr. SERVICE AREA Al.lD PROPOSED SITE LOCATION FOR WWTF ..........1
m. PROPOSED EFFLLJENT LMITATIONS................ ...................2
IV. FLOODPLAINNATI.'RAL HAZARDS ...................2
V. WETLA1.1DS................ ................... ........2
vII. GEOTECHMCAL REPORT.............. .......................3
vlu. TREATMENT ALTERNATTVES....... ................................:........3
D( ESTIMATED FACILITY COSTS...... .......................5
X. RECOMMENDED TREATMENT ALTERNATTVE................ .....................6
ru. LAI{D OWNERSHIP OF SITE.......... .......................7
YJ.V. CONSOLIDATION OF WASTEWATERTREATMENT FACILITY ..........7
)W. IMPLEMENTATION PLA}.I AI{D SCTIEDI.'LE ........................8
t"tt""ttt"t"8XVL CONCLUSIONS AI.ID RECOMMENDATIONS .......................
L GENERAL INFORMATION and PURPOSE
MartinA{artin has been retained by the Rapids Development Corporation to compile various
information prepared by others and prepare, submit and process a Site Location Application and
Engineering Report, through the State Water Quality Contol Division, and local governmental
agencies for review and approval.
The purpose of this document is to provide information to all reviewing agencies for the proposed
constnrction of a wastewater teatnent facility located in the SW %, Section 4, Township 6
-
South, Range 9l West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed
development serviced by this wastewater treatnent facility will be fully residential, and will be
called The Rapids on the Colorado.
SERVICE AREA & PROPOSED SITE LOCATION FOR WWIT'
hoposed Service Area
The proposed WWTF will be designed to accommodate full build-out flows for the described
ninety seven (97) acres of planned residential development and will be expandable for a future
sixty four (64) acre parcel located to the southeast ofthe planned developed property. Other
adjoining properfy has been approved by Garfield County for subdivision exlmpions.
At the present time the existing population is zero, with a full projected build-out population of
485 by the year 2010, depending on market driven sales. A planning build-out schedule for
development is as follows:
DwellingUnits Built
30
30
30
40
40
24
194 Units total
Phasing, Siting and Flow hojections
The proposed WWTF will have a design capacity of 0.060 MGD, and will be located on the
southwest open space area ofthe 97 acre parcel ofland that is proposed to be developed by the
Rapids Development Corporation. The property is situated in the SW % of Section + anO ine Sg
% of Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 9l West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield
County, Colorado.
Flow projections for the full build-out of 194 residential units at 250gpd = 48,500gpd average.
Peak Hourly flow at peaking factor of 3 => 145,500 gallons.
Year
20u
2005
2006
2W7
2008
2009
m.
Other wastewater treatment facilities within a five mile radius of the proposed Rapids WWTF
are:
Town of New Castle - Approximat ely 2.5 miles northeast, upstream and across the
Colorado River.
Apple Tree Mobile Home Community- Approximately 1.5 miles northeast andupsteam
along the Colorado River.
There are no other existing wastewater teatment facilities in the proposed development service
area. A brief analysis of the facilities within a five mile radius (including Silt which is greater
than five miles) is included in section XIV, in accordance with 22.3(c) for the purpose of possible
consolidation of facilities.
Water Suoply
Wright Water Engineers has prepared a complete Water Supply Analysis in accordance withthe
proposed rezoning of the Rapids on the Colorado subdivision. The results of this analysis are
in tra"A in eppendix E.
PROPOSED EFFLI,IENT LIMITATIONS
Eflluent parameters have been requested from the permits section of the Water Quality Control
Division's staff. A copy of the letter of request, with attachments, to the Permits Unit of the
WQCD as well as a table showing the anticipated eflluent limits is included in Appendix F. The
response identiffing the preliminary effluent limitations will be forwarded to all appropriate
parties upon receipt.
FLOODPLAIN / NATT'RAL HAZARDS
The majority of the subdivision lies above the 100-year flood plain of both Garfield Creek and the
Colorado piver as defined in the Flood Plain Study prepared for Garfield and Mesa Counties on
Map No. C-I8 dated December 1982, included in Appendix I. Site grading of the existing Rapids
on the Colorado 33-lot subdivision has been certified to eliminate the floodplain from
development areas. There have been no known natural hazards identified on or near the proposed
site.
V. WETLANDS
There are no delineated wetlands on the site proposed for the wastewater treatnent facility.
w.
YI. CLIMATE
, Theproposed Rapids on the colorado residentialdevelopment lies approximately two milessouthwest of the Town of New castle on the ro"tu .iJ" Jrthe coloriio R;;;; an erevation of5500 feet' The area is characterized by modo*" orini"r
"rrd
spring snowfalls, cold wintertemperatures and moderate summerc.- Ygngrtcfimatotogic"ia"t" ro, Gb";Ld;#;;:(*"closest weather station to New castre) i, i"rileJi" A;;endix G.
The geotechnical report forlh; are19f the proposed wastewater teatnent facility was preparedby HP Geotech in March, 2003 and is inctriOea io app"nA*i. "
VIII. TREATIVIENTALTERNATTVES
The site chosen for the constnrction ofthe proposed wwrF is located in the southwest corner ofa tact of land situated in the sw % of section a ana tne sn y. orse"tion iT;s, R9lw, 6r p.M.,containing I acre, more or less. No other sites *"rc
"uruut"d for the unffill""tion, due to thetopography ofthe site and vicinity to residents uv vv vv rr- ^
ffi:;ffiffi::ffiHt":r]tematives were evaluated. Fo[owing are conceptual desoiptions
VII. GEOTECHMCAL REPORT
Alternative l: Sequencing Bath Reactor (SBR)
Alternative 2: Activated Sludge package plant
Alternative 3: Aerated Lagoon System
General descriptions of the three wastewater treatnent alternatives for the Rapids on theColorado are presented below.
processes,systems' or items common to ea.h ofEil"ste*ateiteatn6Jiiternatives include pretiminarytreafinent, IJV disinfection, odor contor, sorids tr"t n nt *Jairpoot, and buldings.
Preliminary Treatment. The preliminary teatnent system is designed to handle peakhourly flows and includes a grinaer, now'measuremen! and influent channels for flowdiversion.
ultra viotet Dlsinfection.. A IJV disinfection system is included for each alternative.The uv system is sized to handle the peak hourly flow. Benefits of uv disinfection
I
I
I
-
4
include operator safety, compact design, environmentally positive (no chemicals)' and
minimal maintenance requirements'
odor control. odor control and ventilation are included in the preliminary teaftrent
,V.i*, secondary processes, and sludge storage areas for all alternatives'
Solids Treatment and Disposal. Biosolids p-roduced-in the wastewater treatment
Drocess will be uautea to a certified disposal'facility. I! is recommended that, due to the
I*"ri ,f* ,r-,i. A.ility, off-tit. teatnent and disposal is a more feasible option'
Hauling, treatment, *a aitpotut costs are included in the annual operation and
maintenance costs presented later'
standby Power. A diesel generator will be included for standby power for each
altemative.
Alternative l: sBR. The SBR systemrepresents a variation of the activated sludge process' The
SBR works by developi.g "
*iri"O ..rtt*" of bacteria, which is effective in removing BOD'
COD, and nutients cJ*tionty found-rn-wlstewater. The SBR has the ability to act as an
;ddd"; basin, urrution Uasin, and clarifier within a single reactor'
An SBR can fieat flows ranging from a few thousand gallons to millions of gallons per day, and
does not allow influent wasiewater to enter the reactor-during the final aeration, settle and decant
ffi;;;iilr.byrr.u,i,rg u ilgr ddi y final eflluent. one of the kev benefits of the sBR svstem
is the reuse Potential.
This system will be based on a peaking factor of 2. However, if flows exceed the maximum daily
f;;;ih;;trtem *iU uJ"an"" ty"f"t iom six cycles to eightcycles per day, which can
;;ffi#;il";;rk h"*lv lio* with a peaking factor of 4'
Principalsofoperation.TheSBRutilizesasimplerepeatedtime-basedsequence'which
incorporates the following sequence:
o Fill - Influent entcrs for completc mix, then aeration for biological reactions'
o React - Influent flow terminate4 while mixing and aeration continues'
o Settle - Settle for sotidsJiquid separation'
Decant - Decantable volume removed by means of subsurface withdrawal'
Completion of these four operation: h ft9 sequence.dest"l* above constitutes a cycle' which is
thenrepeated.Duringtheperiodofacycle,tu"tiq"ialevelinsidethereactorbasinrisesfroma
setbottomwaterlevelinresponsetoavaryinglluentwastewaterflowrate.Aerationceasesat
a predetermin a p"ri-oJ oitn" .y.r. to allolw tf,e biomassjo flocculate and settle under quiescent
conditions. After a;;;";h;;.,iling period, the treatedeffluent supemltaqt-t: *y:d
(decanted), using a niO"i"g weir dJcanter. This operation reh'ns the liquid level in the reactor
D(
basin to the bottom water level. Surplus solids are wastes, as required, to maintain the biomass
mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) at the required level.
Although SBRs include flow equalization, a post flow equalization basin will be proposed to
Alternative 2: Activated Sludee Package Plant. Activated sludge package plants are typically
used for secondary teafrnent of residential domestic sewage. The package plant would consist of
two aeration basins, secondary clarification, sludge holding tank, aerobic digester and chlorine
contact charnber. LIV disinfection may be used in lieu of chlorine disinfection.
Pri,ncipals of Operation. The flow from preliminary treatrnent will enter the aeration
basins. There are two aeration basins for this system since the flows will be fluctuating
due to start-up and development. In early years or during winter months, only one basin
may be in use, which should provide better teatnent of the smaller flows. The flow next
enters the clarifier where solid-liquid separation occurs. The treated wastewater will then
flow to the disinfection system. The waste sludge will be transferred to the aerobic
digester where further aeration will occur. The biosolids will be pumped out of the
digester and hauled to a treaunent and disposal facility.
Alternative 3: Aerated Laeoon System. An aerated lagoon wastewater treatnent system was
reviewed for wastewater treatnent for the Rapids on the Colorado residential development.
However, it was determined that this alternative is not a viable solution for this project. The
aerated lagoon system facility will not be evaluated any further for the following reasons:
Requires larger land area.
Proximity to residential development.
The expected treatnent is tlpically maximum 85-90 BOD removal.
Vizually unacceptable.
ESTIMATED FACILITY COSTS
(SBR is recommended alternative)
A. Construction Costs
The preliminary opinion of probable constnrction costs for a 0.060 MGD sequencing batch
reactor process as previously outlined herein will be:
SBR Treatrnent Facility $61?.700
B. Operation and Maintenance Costs*
The yearly operation and maintenance costs for the wastewater treatnent facility is aszumed to be
in the range of:
Electicity
Materials
$42Slweek
$1,000/yearTesting $350/month
Sludge Hauling $8,000/year
Operator Labor S37,440lyear (at $4O/hour and 936 hours/year)
This provides an annual cost of $72,740 per year based on a flow of 0.060 MGD, which translates
to $3 1.25lmonth/tap. The certified operator hired by the homeowners association will be
responsible for contracting a certified sludge hauler to perform all hauling needs.
)L RECOMMBNDED TREATMENT ALTERNATTVE
The recommended wastewater treatnent facility for the proposed Rapids Development is a
Sequencing Batch Reactor System (SBR). The major components of an SBR af,e as shown
below:
PROCESS
Headworks; Pre-Treatment
o SecondaryTreafrnent
. Post-Equalization Basin
o Disinfection
o Aerobic Digester
DESCRIPTION
o Screening, Grinding, Flow Measurement
o SBR(Aeration & Clarification in single basin
o To level flow pattern from SBR prior to
disinfection
o Either CIa or UV prior to discharge to
receiving steam (Colorado River)
o Sludge Holding Tank (assume ZYo) for hauling
to disposal
The SBR process was selected as the recommended teatnent process based on the following:
o Small land area required
o Low cost - An SBR facility has the lowest capital cost and also can be operated with the
lowest operation and maintenance cost.
o Reliability - The system has the ability to continuously operate for extended periods,
under varying conditions and with minimal downtime due to major maintenance. The
SBR has the ability to produce consistent quality eflluent under varying load conditions.
It includes equipment redundancy to facilitate routine maintenance and capability to
operate during power failure and major maintenance.
o Flexibilrty- The SBR process can be adjusted to meet a wide variety of influent
compositions and effluent requirements. The system offers redundancy, and capabiltty to
handle peaking flows.
o RegulatoryCompliance-The SBRwill meet CDPIIE's design requirements, andwill
achieve a high qualrty effluent.
o Environmental Concems - The SBR alternative has a smaller footprint and the SBR can
be covered more economically. Covering the system mitigates the potential for odor.
xr.
. Expandability - The SBR has the ability to accommodate additional capacity expansions.
LAI\D OWNERSHIP OF SITE
The land where the proposed WWTF is to be constnrcted is currently owned by the Rapids
Development Corporation. Please find the legal description, title commitnent and proof of
ownership of this parcel of land included in Appendix C of this report.
}ilI. FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES
The Rapids Development Corporation will be financially responsible for the constuction and
initial start-up of the WWTF. (Reference Appendix M - Financial and Managerial Certification).
Upon completion of constuction and certification that the facility is operating propedy, Rapids
Development Corporation and The Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Association will initiate
the formation of a special district to operate the existing Rapids water systems and the proposed
wastewater treatnent facility.
)ilU. MANAGEMENT AI\D OPERATION
Upon approval ofthe "Site Location Applicatiorl" the Rapids Development Corporation wilt
constnrct the wastewater treahrent facility. When constnrction is completed, Rapids
Development Corporation will contact with a certified operator to op€rate and maintain the
wastewater teatnent facilities. The operator will report directly to the President of Rapids
Development Corporation until the special distict is formed and in operation.
)trV. CONSOLIDATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
Several scenarios for consolidation for the wastewater teatrnent facility for the Rapids on the
Colorado development were investigated and are discussed as follows.
Connection to Town of Silt. The wastewater teatnent facility for the Town of Silt lies
greater than five miles downstream of the proposed Rapids Development. Therefore, in
accordance with Water Quality Contol Division policy, no further analysis of this
consolidation altemative is required.
Connection to Town of New Castle. The proposed Rapids on the Colorado development
lies approximately two and a half miles downsteam and south of the Colorado River
from New Castle. In discussions with the Town personnel, New Castle will not serve any
consumers that are outside of the planned service area, nor will New Castle make any
future enlargements to the existing senrice area. New Castle is not willing to entertain
. any discussions regarding connection of outside users, and therefore no further analysis
of this consolidation alternative is warranted
o Connection to Apple Tree Mobile Home Park. The proposed Rapids Development lies
approximately one and a half miles downstream of the Apple Tree wastewater treatment
facility. The Apple Tree lagoon system was originally constnrcted for the mobile home
park and does not meet crurent design criteria. The owners have under consideration the
possibility of performing a plant expansion in the future. A recent improvement to the
facility was the constnrction of a new chlorine contact chamber. However, the facility is
privately owned, and the owner has no desire to accept sewage from any outside entity.
o Connection to Proposed Garfield Hish School (Town of Silt system). Discussions with
the Town of New Castle have revealed that a new high school is to be constnrcted
approximately three (3) miles downstream of the proposed Rapids on the Colorado
development. Assuming that it would not be necessary to cross the Colorado River,
preliminary capital costs have been estimated as follo-ws
Line Survey $8,000
Design and Contract $24,000
Force Main (16,000 L.F.) $640,000
Lift Station $235,000
Site Application $15,000Electrical $8,000Generator $65,000Contingencies $50,000
Tap Fees (Assumed 194 @ $4500) $873,000
Total Preliminary Opinion of Cost for this consolidation alternative is
$1,918,000. Based on this high cost, this alternative is cost prohibitive.
As shown and discussed above, it is evident that consolidation is not feasible, therefore a
wastewater treatrnent facility for the Rapids on the Colorado is practical and economically
beneficial.
XY. IMPLEMENTATION PLAI\I AI{D SCIIEDT'LE
The proposed implementation plan, schedule and timing issues for permitting, design and
constnrction are as shown on the table in Appendix O.
XyI. CONCLUSIONSAI\DRECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that a Sequencing Batch Reactor wastewater teatnent facilitybe approved
and constructed forthe Rapids on the Colorado subdivision.
APPENDD( A
SITE MAP
1i,((r11l-
L-^-..-r,4',
l4
t,I
I
ul
"%
WASTEWATER D MENT PLAN
WASTEWATER
INFLUENT
TRUCK TO
APPRO\ED FACILITY AIRr----
TO
DISCHARGE
EFFLUENT
FLOW
MEASUREMENT
BLOWER
BUILDING
MARTTN / MARTIN
ClEtN6ULTIN6 ENE'INEERB
12499 WclT CoLrax AvE.
P.Ct. Box l3r sc,c,
L.Ax,EwC!oc,, ElO BOZ r 5
3Et3..l3r.ail oo
FAX 303..13 I .4024
SBR SCHEMAT1C
a
O
a
a
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TITLE COMMITMENT
OWNERSHIP DEEDS
PROPERTY BOT]NDARY
LEGAL DESGRIPTION
The Rapids of the Golorado
A tract of land situated in the SW1/4 of Section 4 and the SE1/4 of Section 5,
Township 6 South, Range 91 West of the 6th P.M. described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest Comer of said Section 4;
the-nce N1' SO' OO" W 438.10 feet along the West line of said Section 4 and
atong the Easterly line of that parcel of land described in Book 570 at Page 266
in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder;
thence N 75'43' 18" W 101.89 feet;
thence N 17o 08'41" W 115.59 feet;
thence N 53' 47' 08' W 177.75 feet to the center of the Colorado Rivefi
thence along the center of said river N 23" 43' 15" E 339.10 feet;
thence N 23' 43'20" E 310.00 feet;
thence N 35' 08' 15" E 419.25 feet;
thence N 42'56' 13" E 499.62 feet;
thence N 65' 01'47" E 404.40 feet;
thence N 71'35' 12'E 503.50 feet;
thence N 84" 15'20" E 284.99 feet;
thence S 81'33'38" E244.41feet;
thence S 58' 02' 47" E 266.82 feet;
thence S 68' 42' 11" E 476.70 feet:
thence departing the center of said Cotorado River S 0" 29' 34" E 523.50 feet to
the North6ast Comer of that parcel described in Book 527 al Page 743 as
Reception No.293881;
thence along the boundary of said parcel S 78" 22' 10" W 321 .42teel;
thence S 8"10' 15" E 378.29 feet to a point on the Northerly Right-Of-Way of
County Road No. 335;
thence along said Right:Of-Way S 78" 58: 32" W 207.05 feet;
thence 140.i5 feet along a curve to the left, having a radius of 1030.00 feet, a
centralangle ot7" 47' 46"; the chord of which bears S 75" 04'40" W 140.04 feet;
thence S 71' 10' 47" W 396.23 feet;
thence 66.20 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a central angle of 7"
09'25" and a radius of S3O.OO feet; the chord of which bears S 67" 36'05" W
66.16 feet;
thence S 64' 01' 23" W 296.11 feet
thence departing said Right-of-Way S Oo 14' 42" E 653.7S feet to a point on the
South line of said Section 4;
thence s 89. 20' 08" w 1308.98 feet to the PQINT oF BEGINNING;
said described tract containing 97.269 acres, more or less.
Pnn gl ll1 I earl
Exhibit 28
[and Title Guarantee Company
YouB coNTAcrs
Date: 06-13-2003
Our Order Number: GWZ4|S6Z
hoperty Address:
Buyer/Borrower:
TBD
Setler/Owner:
RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION
If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below:For Closing Assistance: For Title Assistance:
Glenwood Springs ,gw[ IJnit
l3t7 Grand Ave#200
Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Phonq n0-945-ZGt0
Fax: n0_94i4it}4
Need a maD or directions for your upcomlng closing? Check out Land Titters web site at www.Itgc.com
-Ior directi6ns to any of ouind omci'loc"iions.
ESTIMATE OF TITTE FEES
TBD Commitment 97e4.00
TOTAT $784.00
THANK YOU FOR YOT'R ORDER!
Commitment to lnsure
ALTA Cornitmeot - 1970 Rev.
()t0 REpugUc l{ATl0l{Al. TIItE INSUBAiICE C(IMPAI{Y, a Minnesora corporalion. he,ein called rhe colpany, lor a
valuable conside6tion, hueby comits to issuc its polhy or policies ol litlc insurance. as identilied in Schedule A, h laYot
0l lhe proposrd h$led nrflrd h Schcdule A, rs owns ol tmngrgee ol the eslale ol intuesl sorcrcd hereby in the l.nd
described or relcled ro in Schedulo A. upon payment ol the preniums and charges lhereloc all stbiect to the provisions ol
Schedule A rnd B and to the Conditions md Stipulstiont hslol.
This Cormitrrnr shall be cllective only whm tha indcntity ol the proposed lnu[ed rnd the rmunl ol the policy or
potrcies comirred lor haye been inscrtsd in Schedule A hereol by $0 Conp.ny, rithet rt ths tim ol thr iss[ms ol thir
Cormitrrnt ot by crbrequeflt sndorssrrnt.
Ihis Cormitnrent is prdiainary to rhe issurnca ol such policy or policies ol tille h$ranco and r[ fsbinY rnd obfig.tbnr
hacunde, dlalt cura and terrinrte sir rrnths rlta tha attsclir. dale hsrrol or whm the policy or poficies comitted tor
shall issue. whichevu lirrt occurs. provided thrt the lsilure to isure such pofi or Policirs is oot the lault ol the Corpooy'
C0ilOlTl0r{S At{0 STlPULATl0l'lS
l. The tem'mltgrgc', whm used haein, drrll hclude dsed ol trust, lrust decd, or otha rlc{rity hltrurrnt.
Z ll the proposrd lnured has or acquh.t .ctud knowhdge ol rny delct, liol. rncurt0me, rdrs$ chin or othel
mrtta allecting the estate or interesl o. mrtgrgo $erson coyered by this Comitrrnr othcr th.n thots shown h Schedule B hueol. and crall lril to disclosa urch lnowhdgc
by lrilure ol the proposrd lnsured to so discloso such knowledge. ll thc proposed hured shrll disclose urh lnowledgc to tho conprny. or il thc corprny othawise_acquires
rcurl lnowledge ol rny ruch dolect, lhn, encurtrrnce, rdverse claim u other maner, tho conrrny !t its opthn m.y armd Schedule B ol thk comilmcnl rccordingly. but
tuch srgldrEnt clal not rsliws the corprny ftom liability previously hcurred pursuant to plagrsph 3 ol thesa conditions and stipuht'ronr"
3. tiability ol the conpany undsr lhis Comilmnt $.ll be only to the nanrd proposcd horcd rnd ruch prrties
hcluded under the delhition ol hsred h the lom ol poficy or policics comiilod lor snd on[ lor actual loss incutred in rdance hereon h undeilaking h good laith lalro
conply with the lequiremnts hueol or &l to elininate ercspfions lhown in schedule B, o, lclto acqule or oeale the eslate o inlerest or m.lg.ge lhg[eon coYred by this
Cormirrunt. h no evErt drr[ such liability erceod rhe amoint stalrd i0 Schodule A lor the policy or policies comilted lor and such liability is srbiect to the horing
prorisions and the C0nditioos rnd Sripulations and ths Erctusions lrom Coyerage 0l lho lorm ol policy or po$cics corlritted. lor in lavor ol the ptogosgd lnsusd which ue
haeby hcorporrted !y reluence and madc e pan ol this Cotmitmsnt ercept as erpresdy modilied hetein.
4. Any acrio[ or rctioDs or righ$ ol rction thst the proposed lnsred may have u rnrl lrhg agrhst tha Corprny
uiring out ol the ststu3 0l ths till. to rhe estate or hlaest or thr ltatus ol the rrngage rhercon covcrad by this cormitrslt rrrsl bo based on rnd ue albiscl to tha
grovisbns ol lhi! Co,mitrutt.
STAiIOARO EXCEPTIOIIS
h rddirion to rhc mnrrs containcd h tha Conditionr rnd Stipuhtions rod Ercbrbns fiom Corsilge rbore
' rct*rrd to, this Connitnsrt b do subicct to the lollowhg:
l. Rights ol cbims ol prnies in porsersion not shown by lho public
'rcords"
2. Easenmr, or claims ol eorclrnts. nor shown by the publh records'
3. oiscrrgrncict conllicrs in bound]y lines, shoilrgc in rter, encroschmnls, rnd rny lrcls which a conecl
slvey and inspection ol the prcniscs would disclose and which are nol shown by the public rccords.
4. Any lien, ol light fo a lien, lor selvices, labor ol metetial thcretolore or haerllu lurni$rd, imoscd bI law
rnd not shown by the Pubh ncords.
5. oelects, liens, cncurtlances, rdyere clainu or other matters, it rny, ucrled. lirst rDpoadng th rho pubfic r0co]d3
this Cormitment.
lll WlTl,lESS WHERE0F. ()ld Regublic llationol Thle lns,rancs Conpany har ctuad hr coryordte n.ltn and seal lo
be haeunto alfired by iis duly ruthorired ollhus on ths dsle shown in Schsduh A. to be yalid when countersrgned by r rrlidathg ollhu or olhn tuthoti4d shn.to.y.
+*+
{q,i* + +*
Arthodred $gorture 4,E*y'
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
ALTA COMMITMENT
Our Order No. GW24IS62
Cust. Ref.:
l.
,,
Schedule A
hoperty Address:
Effective Date:May 16, 2003 at 5:00 P.M.
Policy to be Issued, and hoposed Insured:
"TBD' Cornmitment
Proposed lnsured:
TBD
T...*r" or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simplc
Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION
The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
LOTS I THROUGH 33INCLUSIVE
THE RAPIDS ON THE COLOMDO
ACCORDING TO THE PI-AT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO.
5133s3
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLOMDO
,a
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-1
(Requirements)
The following are the reguirements to be complied with:
Our Order No. GW241562
payment to or for the account of the grantoni or mortgagon of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be
insured.
proper instrumen(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to'wit:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WIIT BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
@xceptions)Our Order No. GW?4t562
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposedof to the satisfaction of the Company:
l. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey andinspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public recoros.
4. Any lien, or right to a.lien, for-services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law andnot shown by the public records.
5' Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse ctaims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records orattaching subsequent to the effective date hereofbut prior to the daie the proposed insurea acquires'ofrecord forvalue the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment.
-
6' Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office.
7. Any unpaid to(es or assessments against said land.
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
9. DEED OF TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 03, I99? FROM RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,A COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THEUSE OF GENE R. HILTON TO SECURE THE SUM OF $3,85O,OOO.OO, AND ANY OTHERAMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 09, 1997, INBOOK IO32 AT PAGE 994.
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDEDJANUARY 28,2003,IN BOOK I43O AT PAGE 873.
IO. DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 27,2N4 FROM RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ACOLORADO CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USEOF FIRST UNITED BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $1,7OO,OOO.OO, AND ANY OTHERAMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED JANUARY 28, 2003, INBOOK I43O AT PAGE 876.
FINANCING STATEMENT WITH FIRST UNITED BANK, THE SECURED PARTY, RECORDEDJANUARY 28,2N3,IN BOOK I43O AT PAGE 882.
THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIREPROTECTION, SOIr:CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANy WATER
ll.
t2.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)Our Order No. GW241562
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptioN to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA.
13. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH 15, 1898, IN BOOK 12 AT
PAGE 481, RECORDED OCTOBER 27, I9O2 IN BOOK 56 AT PAGE 464, RECORDED
OCTOBER 2, I}44IN BOOK ?3 AT PAGE 225, AND RECORDED APRIL 16, 1924 IN
BOOK 73 AT PAGE 180
14. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH 15, 1898'
IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 481, RECORDED OCTOBER 27, TX)}IN BOOK 56 AT PAGE 464'
RECORDED OCTOBER 2,I}44IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 225, RECORDED APRIL 16, 1924
IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE I8O AND RECORDED APRIL 16, L1}4IN BOOK II2 AT PAGE 578
15. ALL COAL RESERVED BY THE UNITED STATES OR TO PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY IT' THE
RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE COAL FROM THE SAME UPON COMPLIANCE
WITH THE CONDITIONS OF AND SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS OF THE ACT OF JUNE
22, tgto (36 STAT. 583) AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED APRIL 16, 1924 IN
BOOK I12 AT PAGE 578.
16. UNDIVIDED ONE HALF INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS' AS'_- neiCnvrp By EDwrN R. srot-t. AND coLDIE s. srot-l- IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED
.AUGUST 8, 1960 IN BOOK 329 AT PAGE 99, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS
THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN.
UPON RECORDATION OF MINERAL DEED BETWEEN LULA M. JEFFRYES AND GENE R'
HILTON AND MARY J. HILTON, H(CEPTION NO. 14 WILL BE DELETED.
UNDIVIDED ONE HALF INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAIJ RESERVED BY
THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF WICHITA IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1943 IN BOOK
ZOS AT PEGE 463, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN'
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR'
RELIGION, SD(, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND
oNLY TO THE EffENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42'
sEcTroN 3607 OF THE UNTTED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES
17.
18.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)Our Order No. GW241562
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the foltowing unless the same are disposedof to the satisfaction of the Company:
NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT
RECORDED NOVEMBER OI,I974,IN BOOK 466 AT PAGE 29.
19. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THE HUDSON AND SULLIVAN DITCH AS DISCLOSED
BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 30, 1888 AS RECEPTION NO. 620I AND RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 8, 1888IN BOOK 19 AT PAGE 204.
20. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THE MOORE DITCH, READ AND HUDSON DITCH ASDISCLOSED IN INSTRUMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1886 AS RECEPTION NO. 3253,REC0RDED JANUARY 30, 1888 As REcEprroN No. 6201 AND REcoRDED DEcEMBER i9,1887IN BOOK 14 AT PAGE 298.
21. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS AS SHOWN IN ROADVIEWER'S REPORTSRECORDED IIJLY 7,1890 AS RECEPTION NO. 10567, RECORDED JULY 25, 1894 AS
RECEPTION NO. 17518 AND BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 24,I}}4IN BOOK 38 ATPAGE I24.
22. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OFCOLORADO IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 1967IN BOOK 382 AT PAGE 187.
23. ANY QUESTION, DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A
-. RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVER BED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTHER TITANNATURAL CAUSES, OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE, NATURAL OR UNNATURAL, OFTHE CENTER T}IREAD, BANK, CHANNEL OR FLOW OF WATERS IN THE COLORADO RIVERRIVER L}.ING WITHIN SUBJECT LAND; AND ANY QUESTION As To THE LocATIoNoF
SUCH CENTERTHREAD, BED, BANK OR CHANNEL AS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MONUMENT
OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING SUBIECT LANDS.
24. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 96.70RECORDED OCTOBER I7,1996IN BOOK 996 AT PAGE 665.
25. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 97-26
RECORDED APRIL 08, 1997 IN BOOK IOI4 AT PAGE 808.
26. THE EFFECT OFTHE RIGHTS OF OTHERS IN AND TO THE LANDS LYING SOUTHERLY OFTHE THREAD OF THE MEANDER LINE OF THE COLORADO RIVER AND THE LANDS LYINGNORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH BANK OF THE THREAD OF THE MEANDER LINE.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)Our Order No. GW241562
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
I 27. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF
I suuECT pRopERTy REcoRDED SEpTEMBER 9, 1997 AS REcEPTION No. 513353.
28. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT AS CONTAINED IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 09, 1997, IN BOOK IO32 AT PAGE 948.
29. RFSTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT COMAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR'
RELIGION, SH(, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND
ONLY TO THE D(TENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42'
SECTION 3607 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES
NOT DISCRIMINATEAGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 09, 1997, IN BOOK IO32 AT PAGE 963.
30. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DEED TO THE RAPIDS ON COLORADO
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 09, 1997 IN BOOK IO32 AT PAGE
961.
3I. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER
9,19N IN BOOK 1033 AT PAGE 8.
TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM OF WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1998 IN BOOK
1064 AT PAGE 699.
ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCY DUE TO THE LOCATION OF FENCE LINES AND THE EFFECT
OF ANY RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST THAT MAY BE CLAIMED DUE TO ANY SAID
DISCREPANCY.
TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT RECORDED
DECEMBER 04, 2OOI IN BOOK I3O8 AT PAGE 554.
TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 04,
20ol IN BOOK 1308 AT PAGE 560 AND QUIT CLAIM DEED ASSOCIATED WITH GRANT OF
EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 2OOI IN BOOK 1308 AT PAGE 564..
32.
33.
34.
35.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)Our Order No. GW241562
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposedof to the satisfaction of the Company:
36. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MINERAL DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 31,2001IN BOOK 1316 AT PAGE 988.
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
DISCLOSI'RE STATEMENTS
Note:htrsuanttoCRSl0-11-l22,noticeisherebygiventhat:
A) The subject real propeny may be located in a special taxing district.
gi e Cenificate of iaxls Due lildng each tadng jurisdiction may be obtained from the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) Thc information regudirig special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from
the Board of County Commissioners, the Counry Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Effecrive September 1, lgg7, cRs 30-10406 requires rhar all documents received for recording or filing
in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin ofat least one inch and a left, rigbt and bottom
margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to rccord or file any document that
does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms
on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Anicte VII re$'ires that "Every
ride entity shall be responsible for all matiers which appear of record prior to the rirne of recording
whenever the tirle entity conducts the closing and is responsiblc for recording or filing of legal
documents resulting from the transaction which was closed'. Provided qtat Land Tille. Guarantee
Company conducts the closing of the insured trusaction ud is rcsponsible for rccording the
legal'documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not apPear on thc Owner's Title
Poliry and the knders Policy when issued'
Nore: Affirmarive mechanic's lien protecrion for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion
of Excepdon no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be
issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A) The land described in Schedule A of this comrnitment must be a single family residence which
includes a condominium or townhouse unit'
B) N"il;; or marerials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of
construcrion on the land described in Schedulc A of this Commitment within the past 6 mooths.
C) The Company musr receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed
mechanic's and material'men's liens'
D) Tbc Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium'
E) If there has been consrrudio;,tirpron.r.ndor major repairs undertaken on fte Properry to be purchased
. -within six months prior to the Date of rhe Commitment, the requirements to obnin coverage
;;;;."oiJ.J liens will include: disclosure of cenain construction information; financial information
as to the scllcr, the builder and or lhe contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully
executed Indernnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements
as may be necessary "ft"r rn examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumsrances for labor or material for which the insured
has contracted for or agreed to Pay'
I
Note: Ptrrsuant to CRS l0-l l-123, notice is hereby given:
A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed fiom rhe surface esrate and thar rhere is a substantial likelihood that a third pany
holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothennal energy in the propenYi and
B) That such mineral esBre may include the righr to enter and use the propeny without the
surface owner's Permission.
This nodce applies ro owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument
exception, or exceplions' in Schedule B, Secdon 2'
Norhing herein conraiireA wiU be deemed to obligate the company to provide ury of the coverages
refened ro herein unless the above conditions are fully sarisfied
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
OF
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPAI.IY AND LAND TITLE INSI.,RANCE coRPoRATIoN AIYDOLD REPLTBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSI RAI.ICE COMpAT\ry
Title V of the Gramm-I*ach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly
or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic pcrsonal information aLout you with a
nonaffrliated third party unless the insdrudon provides you with a notice of its privacy policies
and practices, such as the type of information thar it collects about you urd thciaregorils of
persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, *"-*" providing
you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Uni titte
Guarantee Company and Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic Narional Title Insurance
Company.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
lnformation we receive from you such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others.
Information we receive from a consumer reponing agency.
lnformation that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real
estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Norice, no additional
nonpublic personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our cuslomers or former
customers to our affiliares or to nonaffiliated &ird panies as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to thc following
types of nonaffiliated companies that perform markedng services on our behalf or with whom we
have joint marketing agreemens:
* Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
* Non'financial companies such as envelope sruffers and other fulfillment service providers.
wE Do Nor Dlsclosb ANY NONPUBLIc pERsoNAL TNFoRMATIoN ABour you wITHANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to
know that information in order to provide producrs or services to you. We mainrain physical,
electronig, and prl9d3ral safeguards that comply wirh federal regulations to guard your
nonpublic personal information.
Form PRlV.PoL.OnT
I rc-O5-O3 L2: O3P :.JJ3Z 9ar0t, .ar, .!..J^ J.---o( t of 2 R rr.0o D o.oo x 0.oo GnRFtELo
P -02
CLEiXRccordcd at
Rcccption No.
SPECIAL WARRT'IYTY DEED
rxrs DEED . mate rtusi,t/.a", o&ild/.,
1997. berwccn Gene R. Hilton graruor(rl, and RaPids
Dcvelopment Corporation. a Colorado corPoration
whosc lcgal address is 2LOZ W. Arapahoe.
grantee(s):
WITI{ESSETH, That thc gnntor(s). for and
in coruidcration of the sum of Tcn rnd 00/l@
Thc foregoing instrumcnt was acknowledged bcforc me dris '?d oty of Septer"loer
-,
1997' bY a--.? \{i\,leon
Witncss m1' hrnd and offtcirl scal.
My commission srPitcs: \ -aO-qq
.I\Sr"Ac.CL.kL..Qxr-U,q,".
Doltars (St0.0O) rnd othet good rnd taluablc
"o*ia.."iion.
thc rcccipt and-suffrciency of rvhich is herebl'acknowledgcd. has grrntcd.
iirgiin a. sold and convcycd. and by hcse prcsens does grurt. bargain' scll' convey and.
.oJ,*. unto the grance(s). ils sucscssors and assigru forcvcr. all rhc rcrl Propcny' togcther with'
iip-ior.r.no. ifiny. situarc. lying and being in Urc Counq- of Garficld. Sutc of Colorado as
deicribed as follows: see Exlribir A anached hcrcto and incorPorlted hcrein by this rcfercncc.
also known by srcct and number rs: Vrcanr [:nd
TOGETHER wirh all and sinplar thc hcrcdiumens rnd lPPunenanccs thcreto belonging.
or in anywisc appcnaining. and rheieversion and reversiotu. remrinder and rcmairders. rcnE.
irrrit .na profiS rhcrcof: and all tie csute. righ. riilc. intersst. claim and dcmand t';1139cvcl
;ii;; ;;;"r(s). cirtrcr in l;w or cquiry. of. in rnd to thc rborc'bargrined premiscs. with thc
hcrcdiamcns and aPPuncnanccs:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD 0rc said prcmiscs abore bugriocd and described wi0r hc
apguncn4nccs. unto orc granrcc(s), is successors and rssigns forever. Thc arantor(stt lg i!-.I'
iir-ru...iro6 anO assiglis. docs'covcnent lnd rgree ttrai it sbell and wili WARRANT AND
iOngvgn DEFEND rie above-bargaincd premisis in rtrc quict and pcaccable possession of the
grantcc(s), irs succcssors urd rssigns. agairut all rnd cvcry PersoD or Pcrsons claiming oc whole
i, .ny p"n thcrcof. by. tluough or undcr the granor(s)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. rhc granror(s) has crccutcd rhis decd on thc date set fonh
rbovc.
STATE OF COLORADO
Slltoq.r \.,',ve'
)
) ss.
)
0lru.. rrl.<.. rt
grrk o, Colo..6o'w.tto?n sloP
P.O. Eox 32O
GtmrYood SPrlnS!. CO 8i60z
.ditlt(lrelr.Xll .la- .l' rF rlellF.
Noury hrblic
,..
t
i
EXI{IBIT A
:c--O5-03 12: O3P P-03
t13352 09109/199? t0:l9e 8t032 p9t6 JE6 a2 ot Z R 11.00 D o.oo x o.so-cnhiiiui--cLenx
A tt:cct ol bnd siluotsd_ia.thc_Stft/t--ot.Scctixt 1 ond tn SEt/t olS*H S lxnshb 6 hr!h, Rotryo gt tJcil ot t,'-d,, i.t-'dh.;;a lo&s:
:
ff::t",31 !1"*w,*^;ii,,::1,Jy1#;,,**w H c &'
?.is!lny-ii'ir.t'i,ot -S-or oi wra ieriu h bk t; fr:Y "'in lhc ffitco ol ttro Gor{aH cwnty M ort- Rid thatxr it i-.J' ttr r -rot.Ett _fxt: th.,rco N'ti u'-ti' i-ili'il tool, rttcttct H53 17'8 r rzT.zg bt tD ttr caily ol^thc Ca :A Rfn;-ih;;oP !lc_-c-4o-ol tct*t rinr N 2J q: tf, E JJg.tO-ittL: U;r;"i2t +r' tr q Jraq !*C tt.ta,{ Jt 4,-tf i-ii.ii frifih;;n a? #' _tf E 199.e2 iovlc nonco H 6A- Ot; ti €''&t.to toat r
;btt; thenct S ef {'Jd E Ztt._tt fcct thcna S b-OZ:t7-{- i266.q2 hoL' thaa t 6q 12' fi' E tei.e, io;ll to-in ,cst thi otlho &pmqr Suffitbl trunption tto.. t; tftottcc otori-mii-ii til :tn, ffi*r7. u_n cano ot ioic C*ne #* i A'e; ii7'SrtAfstt to lht tJqttW Col.zv {-qp_t p=tl *s;Ooa i U* -527e'
Pagt .7p ot beilioa b. frJUili thoaa "bng
-th; buna; oi|ilxrat 5.7? 22' tq r'.r2Agt h!; ttrs*,o S i'O;-til''i lfO.i:ZTt
'",,; ffil -fr -'l:ry#furyYi-{,%'i,* {Jf ,Y,.'ii, fu o ont
27J.26 fcet: tbico S 6tr tJ, Ot t ZN.zt -rii t-tr,h-S 6f br,'2y"t296.tt trct: thoncc.deprtinq nF fisl!-olnoy's-a i]r,ii'r'isifla Tcot too fr.t q? try_trnh i*r oi ta Sdt;n - a; i{qtZo S be 2b, 'di'isi&.sa
leet; to uE rcNT oF B€GrtNthc: n*t xsi'ota irrct inunW-gz,2tt-Zres,,frof. OC ta2
.r! - i.l
,,. ..!"r
. i
{.'r i
Ir
.. r 1..,
, '.' .. .:
..J I ..|' '.'.'
ililil1 ilil rilm lllilt llll lllil llllll lll lllll llll llll
513355 09/09/1997 10:37RI ol 2 R 11.00 0 0.00 N
P.04
)c-O5-O3 12: O3P
81032 P96l 319
O.OO GARFIELD CLERK
QUITCLAIilT DEED
This deed, made this 5-/ day of fuaa.ae4 199?, berween the RAPIDS
DEvELOPMENT CORPORATION (Grantor) and THE RAPIDS ON COLOR"ADO
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (Grantee):
WITNESSETIJ, that the gantor for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar and other
good and vatuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. has
Iemised, released, sold, conveycd and quit claimed. urd by these prescnts does remise, release. sell,
convey and quit claim unto grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all right, title, interest. claim
and demand which the Grantor has in and to those parcels of land depicted and described as
..Common Open Space" on the plat file for public record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of
Garfield Co.nty, Colorado as Riceprion No.5/5353- (Hereinafter collectively "Propenies"),
subject to the following conditions and limitations:'
l. The properties shall be used by the members of the Rapids on the Colorado Homeov,ners
Association exclusively, as open space and said usc shall be subject to all the limitations and
conditions conrained and set forth within the plat frled forpublic record in the Officepf the Clerk
and Recorder of Garfield Counry, Colorado as Rcception No.fl5551- (Hereinafter "Final
plat'), Garlield County Board of Commissioner Resolution No. 96-70 and 0re Protective Covenants
for the Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision, filed for public record in the Offrce of thc Clerk and
R..i ra", of O
"rn.
t O C ounty, Col orado at B o oY/OE, P age fufi Re c epti o n N o, 6JBSI
2. Atl costs and expenscs incident to the maintenance and upkeep of thc Properties shall be
the exclusive responsibility of thc Rapids on.the Colorado Homeowners Association.
- 3. The grant herein is subjcct ro all easements and rights of u'ay of record or presently in
place within the properries and/or depicted therein upon the Final Plat and subject to the rights of
ihe b.neficiaries of such easements and rights of way to make use thereof'
It is the purpose hcrein that the terms and conditions hereof shall extend to and be binding
upon thc Propertics and shall be a covenants running with the land.
Quit Claim Deed.lfoter Rights .Poge I
3c-O5-O3 LZzO4P
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
couNTY oF GARFIELD )
of the Rapids Deve
Llltltl ull Irulllilllll illl iltilllt tilil1il[il
2 oi 2 R 11.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 GRRFIELD cLERx
P-Os
IN WITNESS WHEREoF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date tirsr ser forrh above.
Rapids Development Corporaiion
GENER. HILTON, Preside
2102 W. Arapahoe Dr.
Linleton CO 80120
Theforegoingw1.acknowledged.beforemettriqTa.,fu.l997.by
GENER.HILToN'P'sseRapidsDevelopmentCorporationffis..,.i"'y
\MTNESS my
'My commission expir"r' lt;t47
Address:Ett &lOmdfl "ht( .
,.Ulullwfqr$-,C,0
Quit Claim Deed - lYater Rights Poge 2
"-)k l,ij
>-\it-U:Jl..
\, .l' 1'lul:----,r!*
:'i Eoo==rilt/4
i'i
*
o",i, )j,,,.ffi
t:: lffi! \ uoQ-9.9
?,ft
h
=o
{
G(
uJ
E
SITE WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION
Exhibit 9
Wright Water
818 Cohrado^ve.
P.O.8o(219
Glen^,ood Spdng1 Cdorado 8l 602
19701e4t7755 rEL
1970194t92r0 FA(September4,2W3
13031 89]r608 OEI.IVER DRECT UNE
Mr. Gene R- Hilton
P.O. Box 1274
Uttleton,CO 80120
Rc: Rapids on the Colorado Water Supply Analysis
DearMr.Ililton:
Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (W'WE) analped the water supply ryeuiremenls for thc proposed
plarined Unit Development (P.U.D.) rczoning of the Rapids on the Colorado Dcvelopment in
Garfield County, Colorado. The development will have 204 residential units and 52.5 acres of
inigated land, including open space and landscape amenities associated with the residential units.
The potable in-house water supply for the residential units will be provided from two on-site
wells through a cenrral distribution system. No inigation water will be provided by the central
potable ruatlr system. All inigation in the P.U.D. will be by a separate non-potable system that
diverts water from Garfield Creek through the historic Moore Ditch.
The Hilton Augmentation Plan, decreed in Case No. W-3262, establishes the criteria for
determining thJOemand for water by thc residential units. Residential wastewater will be
collected and treated by means of a central wastewater treatment system.
Table I presents the water requirements and stream depletions for the P.U.D. The calculations
are based on criteria defined in Case No. W-3262; sPecifically:
o Average occupancy of 3.5 percons per unit (year-round)
o Average delivery of 100 gallons per day per Person
o Average stream depletion of delivered in-house water treated through a central
wastewater treat{nent system of 3 percent
Annual potable diversions at full build out will equal 80 acre-feet (AF), and annud depletiols
will be i.+O af. The two wells are capable of pumping the full amount of watcr required for
domestic use for the project. The maximum pumping rate from the well system is expected to
bc about 100 gpm, wtrich exceeds morimum demands. The domestic system will be designcd
to have more than 100,000 gallons of storage to meet daily peaking needs.
Because of their junior priorities, the depletions resulting from the domestic use of water
pumped from the wells will need to be replaced to the Garficld Creelc/Colorado Rivcr system
i*irig the irrigation season. This nesd can be met through the operation-of the augmentation
plan Iecreed in Case No. W-3262 by permanently removing 0.8 acre of land lying under the
ivloore Ditch from inigation. This amount of dried up acreage was calculated at the average
consumptive use rate of L.379 AF per acre per year, as recognized in the decree.
DEtwER 1303' 18Or 700 UJM'{GO 19701259-7fl r EOTXDER - 13031 {73-9500
Mr. Gene Hilton
September4,2003
Page2
The amount of land that will be withdrawn from inigation as a result of the construction of
streets and the dwelling units is expected to be about 29.2 acres, which is 28.4 acres more than
what is required to augment the irrigation season domestic use depletions.
The decree recognizes that there is no senior demand for water from the Garfield Creek during
the non-irrigation season, so there is no requirement to replace the P.U.D's depletions durini
that season to that system. Neither is therp iurrently any non-irrigation season senior call fiori
the Colorado River that would call out the P.U.D's junior well rights. Nevertheless, should
such a call materialize, provision has been made through a contract with the West Divide
Conservancy District to deliver of up to I AF of stored water to the Colorado River.
It is otu opinion that theproposed Rapids on the ColoradoP.U.D, as described in.this letter, has
an adeguate physical and legal water.supply to meet its full build out warer demands.
Please sall if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
WRIG}IT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
By
William L. Loratr, P.E.
Senior Consultant
cc: Jack Ross, Esq., Dufford & Brown, PC
D.rwo*\WwEllrgt-99.t?7\Repi<b o rtt Cota.rrq WS.trb
TABLE {
RaPlds on the Golorado
Diverslon and Depletlon Requlrements
GENERAL NOTES:
ut zuEquivalent Residential units (EaR) at 350 gallons per day per EQR in AF/month
iZi Same as (1) except in gallons per minute (gpm)
(3) 37o of column (1)
(4) Same as (3) excePt in gPm
Wrtght Wal* Engln*rs lnc.' Des BY:JSA
Ckd BY: WLL
August 18' 2003
MONTH
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM DEPLENONS
ACRE-FEET
({t
GALLONS PER
MINUTE
(2t'
ACREfEET
(3)
GALLONS PER
MINUTE
(4)
,AilIUARY
FEBRUARY
IIARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY j
AUGUST :,'.:" i.
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
6.79
6.19
6.79
6.57
6.79
6.57
6.79
o7e
6.57
6.79
6.57
6.79
49.6
49.6
49.6
49.6
49.6
49.6
49.6
., 49.6. r.,
49.6
49.6
49.6
49.6
0.20
0.19
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
'0,20
.0:20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.49
1.49
1.49
1.49
1.49
;l;49
':ll'ag
;,i:1r,49
1.49
1-49
1.49
1.49
IOTAL 80.03 2.40
l:lprqFds\ruol08 I {Xi3t000lsa\}lllton(Gv}Depbtions 1of 1
ON-SITE WELLS
T-660 P.03/03 t-396
0Z-15-0a 04:?lPH
Gw$?5..a I
.t
fR0[-0lvlslott ot uAlER RESoURCE].-,,.*r 3038662223
COLOB ) DMSION OF WATER RESOUBCEI.
!10 Ccntonni0l OdO., lsl3 Shcrmaa SL, D.nwt, Cotcnco BUCEI
(3o$ e86sssl
Exhibit I1
APPWA^Ir
RAPIOS OEVELOPMENT CORP
zI@W ARAPAI{OE DR
UTTTETON CO 8OI2}
(sos)7s8-1640
nrpros oN THE coLoRADO
aPPROVEQJV+L LocArloN
CARFIEIO COUNTY
SW 'tl4
Twp 65
sW t/.1 S€ction 4
RANGE 91 W 6th P.M.
Lor Blocl:
DISTANCE6 FROM SECTIOE-ULIES
73r FL lrom SoLtlh Seqion Une
1015 Ft lrom Wea Soction tine
DIV. 5 CNTY. A WO 45 OES. BASIN
-E_-_
MO
PER}ffT TO USE'SI EOSMNG WEI,I
TSSUANCE OF THIS PEF}'Tf OOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
gonoruors orjPpnort
1) Tns woll shall be usgd h sr,,ch F way as to cause no materlal hlury to eristing waler right3 Ths issuance ol th€' p.*rt does n93 assurg rtxi appticarit lhat no hiury wll ocrrrr to anolnor ve9(Bd warer rignt 0t p(eclud0 another
b,fnOf of avaSeO water rigltl ftom Seet<tng relid n a civil coun a61on.
el Tlre consrucrion ot tns well shalt Do n comphanc€ willt th€.W-aBr Well GorrUuction Bules ? CcR 4@'a unEss
iiprgr,"f O a vatancs has ueen grantsd- uV_*: Stae Board of Exarniners bf Waler Well Congrr.rcrlon and Pump
hisrallston Contracrors ln accordance wiln Bule t6'
s) Approveo puGiuar[ ro cRS 37-90-137(2) on mc cOnctitiOn rnEt th6 well be oper4edin acsoroance with the Gene' a i{iton .tlgmemadon p6n approreo d ma DMsion 5 Water Corr( in case n+ w3282 ll the we! is no oPoraoo
in accordanca whhtrc terms ot sald decrs€, lt wilt be sublerl ro actminisration irElucting orders to cease dlwning
rf,atef.
4) Approv6d br $a use ol 8n sxisting well permit oo' 4778of (qPkd]'
5l Tha uga ot ground wfler trom tnis well is limited to a wat€I suPPty fol a.ro hl subdivisbn as clecreed h cese no'
w{284
6l T?re nraximum pumping rae slullnot exceod'120 GPM.
7l Tno snnusl amount of gyound water to bo wilhdrarvn slralt nor qcRecl e0.62 acr&rgol.
8t A rc,tstiztno ltory metB, must b€ lnslallsd on mis well anct mahalnsd in gooo worlting 016€r. Psrmancnl tocofds
Engher uPon reqtrest
9) Thlr wsll shall b€ locaterl not more than 200 leer trom the bcaion specifled on lhis permit, ano nol loss lnan 600
leA trom arU exis$ng well o$rned by ofiers,
t0) The oyrnB, shall mark tlre wellh a conrpicuous place wiih wEll Porml( number(s), n8lno ot th3 aquller, and coun
casa nurnb€<s) ;;pproprfi; rne twner shatt rat e necssaty m€ans ilno Prgcsrliong lo ptxerve thesa
markings. 0D t_b_E
0 ? lsgg
I2
---r-.= ,-<--
Im
l. r,
GWS-I I()0
CHANGE IN OWN ERSHIP/ADDRESS
CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION
the Well Permit Number 0/?6 6 / -F
Mailing Address Z-/ O Z 4)e=r c Dtu.
:y, St. Zip O lzo -3oo
rone (3O3) 779 -./6 y'O
' ,tis fotm is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permitted as referenced above.This filins is made Dursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143.
'ELL LOCATION County G.t<Or:-O Owner's Well Designation &zros 41zz.t til. t
STATE OF COLORA
OFFICE OF THE STA.I E ENGINEER
818 Centennial Btdg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203
(303) 866-3581 Fax (303) 866-3s89 FF(,:EI\'*I;
DEC I. B Znrll
ti^.ii$:fii,."$'
If your well has an absolutc water right, decrccd
by the court and the well is not registered wirh the
State Engincer, cnter the'Water Court Case
Number/ Civil ActionNumber and well number
as decreed.
Signature(s) of the new owner.
5 a.1/7H€ Lol-or?ADO
Date
--/8 Vc<. zoa )
(State)(zip)
5a) tA ot the15&!1/4, Sec. 4 ,rup. Q Cru. or ZIs., Range a / f e. or$w., 6r*p.rrt.
'ance from section Lines 7g / Ft. From I *. orE s., / D/5 Ft. FromEe. o, Ew. Line.
ubdivision Name TPIDS 7//€4,Block
(Address)(city )
Fiti
the above listed owne(s)say(s) that he, she (they) own the well described herein. The existing record is being
mended for the following reasons: p cn"nge in name of owner tr;;;.n. in maiting address
-l
H.3:t*,:l "lJ?:.!ion fo1 exempt wells. permitted prior to May 8, lgt2and non-exempt weils permitted before
,"..iion
"rin. *.[ l";;ti;;.
(we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well described above and that the commencement ofextraction of ground water from this well, laMully made under the well permit, occurred on the date indicated, andrat the statements made herein are true to my (our) knowledge.
,r is.the responsibility of the new owner of this wett to c{npfeViffatigiltrtffi!
original letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt.
res of agents are acceptable if an
For Oflicc Usc Only
ACCEPTED AS A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP
AI{D/OR MAILING ADDRESS.
l8-l?- hatt
-
i'lease print the Signer's Name & Tiile
. No.
iv -25
OFFICE OF THE' \TE ENGINEER
COLORADO DIVISTJN OF WATER RESOUHCES
81E Ccntennlal Bldg., 1313 Sherman SL, Denver. Colorado 80203
(303) 8563s81
, .ICANT
GENE R HILTON
2102 W ARAPAHOE DR
LITTLETON CO 80120.
(303)7s8-1440
IRMTTTO USE AI.I EK|SNNG WELL
Subdiv: RAPIDS ON THE COLORAOO
APPROVED WELL LOCAT1ON
GARFIELD COUNTY
1 095
SW 1/4 Section 4
RANGE 91 W 6th P.M.
Lot Block Filing:
sw 114
Twp 6S
prsrANcES FROM SECnqN UNES
731 Ft. from South Section Line
1015 Ft. from west section Line
,j
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
coNDmoNs oF APPROV L
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material iniury to existing water rights. The issuance of the
permit does not assurg the applicant that no iniury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another
owner ol a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
The construction o, this well shall be in compliance with the water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402'2' unless
approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water well Construction and Pump
lnstallation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuant to cRS 97-90-1g7(2) on the condition that the well be operated in accordance with the Gene
n. if inon Augmentation plan approved'by the Division 5 Water Court ln case no. W€262. lf the well is not operatecl
in accordance with the terms irisalo decree, it will be subiect to administration including orders to cease diverting
water.
The use of ground water lrom this well is limited to a water supply lor a 40 lot subdivision as decreed ln case no.
w-3262.
The ma<imum PUmPing rate shallnot exceed 120 GPM.
The annual amount of ground water to be withdrawn shall not exceed 40.62 acre-feet.
A totalizing llor,+meter must be installed on this well'and malntained in good working order, Permanent records
of a[ diversions must be maintained by the welt owner (recorded at least annually) and submined to the Division
Engineer upon request.
This wellshail be located not more than 200leet from the location specified on this permit, and not less than 600
feet from any existing well owned by others.
The owner shall niark the wellin a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name ol thB aquifer, and coun
case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these
markings.
)) Approved for the lnstailatton of a pump ln, and the'use of, an existing well, constructed on April 1, 1996, to a depth
of 82 feet, under monitoring hole notice MH-2768+A acknowledged March 26, 1996.
&]t t-1-17
,'rii
l*! X.
d\
s)
I
,)
o,
rrtOVED
JO2
:eipt No.
WELL PERMIT NUMBER
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23
o47799 -r -_
MDWD 45 DES. BASIN
o4o23s#o.* DATE rssuioJAN 1 3 1gg7 &r,*r,o* DATE JA[t i 3 i$gg
IY
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT
n.
Onest
i,i;lLL lii; CC
r ICE OF'THE STATE ENGINEER
. WELL PERMIT NUMBER MH-27684-A
er Name(s) : GEne
Mailing Address : oh EO2 Grand Ave. Ste f 325
City. St. Zp:Glenwoo<t Spnngs, Co. 91601Pnone (920) 945-2236,i
GEOLOGIC LOG :
WATER LOCATED : 50.55
REMARKS :
SW 114
APPROVAL, Gr ,s3t.9t{3
wp.ange 91
West
OISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES:
731 ft. ftrom South Sec.line. and
SUBDIVISION:
STREET ADDRESS AT \AELL LOCATION :
A
DATECOMPLETED O4l01/96
101 5
LOT
It. from
BLOCK
Sec. tine. OR
FTLtNG(UNtT)
ILLING
rOTAL OEPTH Ez n.DEPTH COMPLETED E2
Arnt. us€d :
Qprp ro5 Ae* No" I
VIELL TEST DATA : I Check Box lf i
TESTING METHOD: Air Compressor
Slatic Leyet :13 n. Oale/Tlme Measurecl
Pumping Level : Total n. Date/Time Measured
Remarks :
aa.rur, ,lrr taa c.fD anal i E ri-rtlt aa ! cb.a I ir€.ma6.l
^'TNTMCTOR ' Shelron Drilling Corp.
orne / Title (Please or
04.t01196
04/01/96
Produclion Rate :
Test Lengln :
20 gpm.
2 hrs.
r
pth i Type of MateriallSrz{Eot6ffiffi}?j
6idi,'52-1---"i6'sa-Gii-rifr ffi-rio;--
Material :
Size:
lntenral :
Type : Fornalion
Depth : 30
Wayne Shelton / President
Phone : (970)9274182
r]Z-l 5-02 01:Zl PM
vlrea! i
a
IROU.OI\lISIOIT OF HAIER RESOURCES
303S662e23
. i,ULUHAD( VISION OF WA'IER RESOURCES
EtO Cefli{lnlrl Bldg.. l3l3 Shoman 5t. Oowor. Cotorsdo 60e0J
FOel 06&3501
I-560 P.O?,/03 F-396
Exhibit I I
Sw 114 Soclion 1
R $,tGE gl W 61h P.M.
APPLICANT
1095
WELL PEFTTIT NUMBEB o{3660 .E__
MDDtv. 5 CNW. A WD 4s DE8. B SIN
Lot: 8ro3k FlllnO: S{bdrv: RAPIoS oN IHE COLOnAOO
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
OCRFIETD COUNTY
BAPIDS DE1IELOPMENT CORP
2IO2W AFAPAHOE DR
uTnEroN co 8012s
(3fir)79S1&to
sw 1r4
Twp 68
otsTArtgEE FFoM sFsn9N uNEq
560 Fr trom SolJtn secrbn une
664 FL lrom wos Seaion Hne
PERUIT TO t'8E AN EISiTING TIEII
l)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PEBMIT OOES NOT CONFER A WATER SIGHT
CONDMONS OF APPROI/AL
Thts vrertsnall bo useCt in sucn a yray eS to caus6 no m8rstial iniury to uising w8ter rignE The issuance ol na
pefmit do6 not aa$ro tne appllcarn rh3r no gjg-ry wlll-occut to another vosted walel right ot Preclucle Snother
bnner ol a vffiteo wator right kom ooeking relie{ in a Civil coun action.
The construcrion cf thls wel snau bo in comphancc wilh lho walof Wsll Connrudlon nules 2 CCR 402'2' unlss
appro,if ol avanEncB has bsBn grBntod. ry the Stac Boarct ol Examlners of WatorWell Coristruction and Pump
fi*araion Coruracrqs in accordance wlln Bde 18'
Applorcd pursusnt to cRS 97-90.137(2) On fie CondilOn tna tne welt !r operatad in accordane with the oons
i irfnon flgmeildion Plan approved oy tne Division EWaBr Cou,t in casa no. W.3262. tl thewel is not o?ollod
in'accorcanio wlrh $re tBrms if sao dBcrea I will be subiecr ro adfnlni$fiilion lnctuding ordar8 lo c€Elss divening
walef.
ApFOved lof tha r.re ol an s,tglng wetl. permit no. 47781-F (exPircd).
The use of ground wasr trom this well F llmited to s wBrer suppv lor a 40 lct gubdivlslon 8s deqeed in casE no
w€262.
Ths marirnr,m PumPhg rgte shatl not erc€ect 70 GPM.
Thc annuat amoum ol grounct srEtor to bo wihorarrn 8nE[ not o<ceod 24.9 acr8Pte€t
A totatizing flow meler ml.lsr b€ inslatted on l'ris wefi and rnaimahoo ln good *ting otder. Permanent tocor&
ot al oiva;tons mu$ be rllalntalngd by he wsll orrner (recorosd sr loEl! annualty) BnO submltred to Up Dlvbion
Engino€r uPon ?Equosl
g) Thb we[ shalt be locded mt moro man 2OO teet lrorn the location specified on lhh parml& and nol l€ss $an 400
teet ltom arry erlsting well orneo by othera
10) .Ttle O$rner Shall marklhi uell in a consplcuous plac3 whn we[ permi numb€r(s). n8,n€ d the aqulter. and coun
'case nurnber(s) aa appropriare The owner sns[ lat(s n€cessary means and precaUlgns tO PIeS€Ne tnose
rnai<ings
tD q4-n
4)
5)
6-)
7t
8)
7,rrr*g.rffi.rr* -
Beceipt No. 0425932A OATE ISSUED ?*r,*ro* DATEAPR 0 7 lggg
rn
a.a.
GV/S-l l
/00
r^sert the Well Permit Number
P/ ?S ott/ 7t{€C-blor?
CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP/ADDRESS
CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION
04?660-F
,{ss
FrME$ycG=ra /?. 4z-za r,/
Mailing Address -z/ O - cUxf A rztt fnt/oc ZtZ tlr
/
ity, St. 7ip .h
-azo,r',
CO *O /zo - Z oo g
rone ( 3o3) 7? F-/6y'O
' his form is filed by the named individual/entity claiming that they are the owner of the well permitted as referenced above.
This filino is made oursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143.
/ELL LOCATION:County &,."F/E ar Owner's Well Designation &Zg;ilac
-Sut
li
tancefrom section Lines gao Ft. From I N. orE s., b5/ Ft. FromI=. or. Ew. Line.
lubdivision Name 2/1/azatZz?O0 Lot Block
(Address). (city )(State)
114 ot the €311l4, Sec. 4 ,T*p.c Ir'r *ES., Range Qr Ee.*K w., G
(zip)
P.M.
Fili
t lporrection of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8,1g72and non-exempt wells permitted before
^Aay 17. 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding correction of the weil location.
(we) claim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well described above and that the commencement ofextraction of ground water from this well, lawfully made under the well permit, occurred on the date indicated, and
hat the statements made herein are true to my (our) knowledge.
ihe above listed owner(s) say(s) thal he, she (they) own the well described herein. The existing record is being
rmended for the following reasons: Elcn.nge in name of owner E cn"nge in mailing;;5-
.t is the responsibility of the new owner of this well to complete and sign the form. Signatures of agents are acceptable if anoriginal letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt.
For OIIicc Usc Only
ACIEI}TED AS A CHANGE rN OWNERSHTP
AI{D/OR MAILING ADDRESS.
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ,inlclNEER
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203
(303) 866-358'l Fax (303)866-3589
:c Use Only
FFCEIVFTI
DEC 1 8 200i
"dyi[HBHegH'
If your well has an absolute water right, decrecd
by the court and the well is not registered with the
State Engineer, enter the Water Court Case
Number / Civil Action Number and well number
as decreed.
Signature(s) of the new owner.
/, Ds zea(
?tzet?fl7
fr fuE,T l?-tt- tu>l
No.
' ,--25
OFFICE OF THE STP' ENGINEER
COLORADO DtVlSlOt\ OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Centcnnlal Btdg., 13i3 Sherman St. Donver. Colorado 8o203
(3O3) 86e3581
,,I'LICANT
GENE R HILTON
21o2W ARAPSHOE DR
LITTLETON CO 8012&
(303)7s8-1ilo
=RMTTTO
USE AI.I E(ISNNG WETT
.. TROVED
JO2
1)
2)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
coNpmoNs oF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material iniury to existing water rights. The issuance of the
permit does not assure the applicant that no injury wilt occur to another vested water right or preclude another
owner of a vested water rlght from seeking relief in a civil court action
The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water WellConstruction Rules 2 CCR 402'2, unless
approval of a variaRce has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump
lnstallation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuarit to CRS 37-9C137(2) on the condition that the welt be operated in accordance with the Gene
n. kinon nirgmentation Plan approved b-y the Division 5 Water Court in case no. W3262. lf the well ls not operated
ln accordanle with the terms oisald deCree, it will be sublea to admlnistration including orders to cease diverting
water.
The use of ground water from this welt is limited to a water supply for a 40 lot subdivision as decreed in case no.
w€262.
Ttie ma4imum primping rate shall not exceed 70 GPM.
The annual amount of ground water to be withdrawn shall not exceed 24.9 acre-feet.
A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order.. Permanent records
of alt diversions must be maintained by the wellowner (recorded at teast annually) and submitted to the Division
Engineer upon request.
This well shallbe located not more than 2OO leet from the location specified on this permlt, and not less than 600
feet from any existing well owned by others.
The owner shal! niark the wellin a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and courl
case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to PreseNe these
markings.
0) Approved for the tnstaltation ol a pump ln, and tlie use of, an existing well,
depth of 82 feet. urtder monitoring hole notice MH-ZI6€/-IB, acknowledged
,#.i#i;,.irY
1095
DIV. 5 CNTT. 23 WD 45 DES. BASIN
E__
MD
Lot Block Filing:Subdtu: RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SW 114 SW 1/4 Section 4
Twp 6 S RANGE 91 W 6th P.M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
560 Ft. from South Section Line
6il Ft.lrom West Seaion Line
constructed on APril 12, 1996, to a
March 26, 1996.
s)
I
7)
sl.!. arehi,
ceipt No. o402397b DATErssuEJAN 13 1997 &r,*ro* DATEJAI{ 1 3 13gB
!l0!{ tU:!t i.H SIi[! '-'r i i.lLL !]it (i !.qi Ni
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT
slATE_qE qOlOruO, eIElcE oF THE SrArE ENGTNEER
I WELL PEEMTT NUMBER MH-27684_B: Gene Hihon
Mailing Address : 802 Grand Ave. Ste # 325
Ciry, St. Zp:Glenwood Springs. Co. E1601Phone (970) 94S2236
114
DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES:
560 fl. from South Sec. tine. and
SUBOIVISION:
STREET ADDRESS AT \A,ELL LOCATION :
A
DATECOMpLETED O4t1?Jg6
r. GEOLOGIC LOG :
WATER LOCATED : 52 - 56
REMARKS :
654
LOT
TOTAL DEPTH 82
ut12t96
04t12t90
APPROVAL, GV\631-9t{3
p.6 Range. 91W
\lUest Sec. line. OR
FtLING(UNtT)
Air
OEPTH COMPLETED E2
4
ft. from
BLOCK
y9e
flp5,r D9 Vea-u ['(o. ]
eck est Data is
TESTING METHOD: Air Compressor
Slatic Level :18 n. Dale/Time Measured
Pumping Level : Total n. Date/Time.Measured
Remarks :
. r iH roa ha Bn.(a ,BOa rran :,! lffi r gcaD graiGi. ma' J ' galr, . !r. Eia a.!ri ea Uun .h.Dra r a Glg I refcng,l
'.ONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Corp.
.urn€ / Title (Please or Print)
Pro<luaion Rate :
Test Length :
20 gpm.
2 hrs.
Material:
Size :
lntenal:
Type : Formation
Deptn : 30
Wayne Shelton / President
Ula Urrt f a ,!a D
WELLS WITHIN I MILE RADruS
it;:tti;tt,i==')iu.ng',': f ;.,
V ,.(,i't{.,/Aj'*
r -':-\ 1 /-i*.N\- 5t'Naxg
\ -Ei-n_11
w,i/,t
i.'\
D\
(\.;'
REPORT DArB 12111/03
PERI{IT D c|C ONNER INPORIIATION
AqIIVITY STATUS
CD DATE CD DATts
COIORADO nELLS, APPLICATIONS, AND PERMITS
COI,oRADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PAGE
WELL WBIJT IIATER SEC LOCIAT'N TOnN P
yrELD DEPII| LEVEL CEORDTNA1tsS Q([RS SC SHrP RAIIGE !'.!
1ST USED AI|NL'AL ACRES GEOL
tID MD DB USE DATE APROP IRR AOTR
224lr7lfil523IrGNrMARYC/OSIIELTONDRTITIJINGBASAITT'Cp81621
5 23 TILLISOI{ H T
1{189?523EALI'GARYll&sBERRYA39053HIOI{nAI6NE'TCASIIA'C!816{?
OIrEllllD SP(t, Co 81601
119053 A523rlItlLISoNHELIRYTo3{{coBIEIJr,RDGIJElfIlooDSPGS,coSlSol
5 23 ilrLr,ER Tf,EADOR A 39051 HIGIIWAY 6 NEtl cAsfla' co 815'l?
L77184 5 23 IPGAN rilARy EDITH P O BOX 2??1 GIJEIInOOD SPG{i' C! 81502
A523DI'XNPA GRAID irrrllclx, co 81501
5 23 TARRO
'IAIIES
ll8fl CAATLE, @ 816{?
113336 5 23 PRIffTE ctlAnIJEs N & IRBri,E E 6809 c:o nD 214 tIEt. cAaTI.E, cD 815.7.9?85 IOCI EATEE EXE!| TIOI
1510'[3 s 23 BAIBS PATRICK 6809 21' RD IEr CAATLE' C! 816{?
1510{3 A 5 23 HAtEs PATBTCK 5809 21{ RD tlEr cAsrLE' Cp 815{7
232511 5 23 JororSoN BRECK. 0353 rm| sHADotlS DR GI,Etl}looD sPRIMl, c9 81601 I.611I IIAYES ETEMPTION
L37621 523colaYED&IlIllDA6?65cor,lITYnD21.tlBllcAsTr.E,co816.?to|r
5 23 iIOHNSON HorIER C 5511 C! RD 21{ NEtl CASTITE' Ct 815t?toI
19330F 5 23 i,otlNsoN HotrlER c r IonB1ITA A 5611 co RI, 21. tlBtl cAsm.E, co 816.?IfT
10?e7r 5 23 ttrlrRgTlll EIDOI O3{9 APPIJE DR t{En CASTI'B' CO 816{?
25157P s 23 rnX[IES DAVID a, a6O6 15{TH RD GITENnooD SPROS' Co 81601
a599 A 5 23 rrrsBEr DONATJD O 6s33 Cn 214 rEW CASTLE' Ct 816'7 tor
t25L91 5 23 l,PRnIS S iI Gr,EMr@D SP, Ct 81601 I,cxr III'GIIIES I{INOR
175387 523llArlSON{IOHNC&BEVBnIJYV66092IIROADNETCASn'E'C:o816'?IOA 1 HtxlEBS UrtfoR ElrBDrv ExEllPT
rgt 2 BUGHES t'tINOR sT'BDIV EXETIIPT5 23 BOSEIJI MARY AITNE EOX 26 ll@DY CREEK, Cp 81656
3 IITN'IIAS rilINOR SUBDIV ETBISI5 23 BOSBLY IIIARY AllIIE BOX 26 WOODY CREEK, CC' 81655 IOT
1?5390 5 23 BOBELY I[IARY AIuE P O BOx 26 TOoDY CREEK' CO 81656 tgl HUSttEs MuloR
{{15tFB523rarTtsaIottNA5511nD21'NEtfcAsTLE'C:o816'?
REPORT DAtE 12l11/03
PERUTT D CO ONNER INFoR!,TATIoN
COIJORADO WEIJI]S, APP'JICATIONS, AND PERIIITS
COIORADO DIVISION OP WATBR RESOURCES
PAGE
Acrrvrrv srArus 1sr usED AIiINUATJ AcREs cEoL TEIJIT I1ELL SATBR sEc IrocAT,N To,'NcD DATE cD DATE wD llD DB usE DAIE ApRoP rRR AQFR YrELD DEPrH LEVEIJ C@RDTNATES eltRs sc sHrp RAI{GE
lr1415{F 5 23 WHITE JOHN 6611 RD 214 NEw CASTLE, CO 81642
|
I
19s613 s 23 B.SEIJY UARY ANNE Box 26 wooDY cREEK, cp 8165G 16'1 2 HucHEs ur,oR i
I
I
19561{523BowI,EsIolWrE&AIiINPoBox9{6NElfcAsrIJE,.co816{7Ior3HIrcE8silIroR
-l
I
I
I
I
I"l
""* o .r rr* lI11903i A 5 23 CILIJER !,|ARVIN NEn CnSTIrE, CO 816a? I"l
I
I"t
I
I't
L26733 s 23 ,.,URR R i' ,n'r CASTIJB, Cp El64? II
I
REPORT DATE 12l11/03 COLORADO WEIJJS. APPLICATIONS, AiID PERUITS
COIOR.ADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT D CO OIINER INTORIIIATION
AgIMT'l( STATUS 1ST USED ANIUAIJ ACRES GEOL IIELL WELI, WATER SEC I,oCATT]r TOnN P
CD DATE CD DATE tlD MD DB USE DATB APROP IRR AQPR YIELD DEPIH r,EvEIr CIORDIITATES OTRS SC SHIP R.AI|GIE M
65494 A 5 23 PEACH VALLEY PARTIIERS HOGAN IIARILYN & IIARC BRECKEInIDGE, CO 80{2{
Np o9l13/OO {s Grf 1s.00 106 80 1350N,0800w swtm a 5 s 91 rl s
65/19{A 5 23 PEACII vALLgr PARI'IIERS LLC BOX 2607 BRECKEXiIRIDOE, C! 80{24
Np 06111/01 otf 10.00 L21 8? 1350[,0800n stllim 4 6 S 91 W A{5
s4662 5 23 ME L8!{ARD B & PECTGv ir. 39490 Hrnr 5 & 2l NEn CASTIA, C! 816{?
39 D 01/18/81 1.00 GIl 15.00 240 80 1960N,1392f, SrrW { 6 E 91 r I
65,19a 5 23 IIEIJTON ElrAll I}lOffiY I FAIIRLEI{DER ll L P O BOX 395
ND oel2rl12 0C L2l3Ll95 a5 01l3ll7!
CARBONDAT,E, CO 81623
Gr 15,00 115 91 1{90N,0?20W SmtW a 5 S 91 ll S
20285P 5 23 BREIII{AT PROPERTIBS IXC 4039 C! RD 335 NEfl CAATLE,
r[D 1r /2sl?s 39 rD fJ9ll0176
c! 816{?
GW 15 15{?S,2{9{ENrfSB a 5A 91rA
20285p R 5 23 BRENNAIf PROPERTTES llBll CASTITE, CO 815a? Iror 10
i[D 10/20/?5 RC 06130/9? 39 I Glf ?5 1a80s,2{9aEI{W8B { 68 91ra
20285P R 5 23 BRAIittitAt PROPEnTIB8 FO BOX a89 GLEllllq)D SPRII|G, OO 81602
a9 .l9l16l'l2 .s D 3.00 clll 1a80a,2a9tEI|IISE a 5I 9lrS
27683ilH 5 23 SI&TON GBNE R t ETARTECH IIIC Gl.tilD APRI}IG8, CO 81602
5 23 IIrIJTON O R GT,EI|nOOD 8Plt, CO 8160122309F
Ee o.l)q117 15 I Grl tlBsr { 5g 91 rS
1{8028 5 23 PAilrB T.AIIRENCE r 38992 n HrY 5 & 2t NEll CASTLE, C! 816{7
ND oq/1ela? 43 D Oll 15.00 20 2t00s.2300rrNEsr I 56 91rs
1{8028 A 5 23 ALC0RN EAru,El{E K & CLYDE DALE 38992 RIVER FROITTA(IE nD NEll CASTI,E, CO 81647
Np 0sl18/8? OC 08/1219? {5 p cH 15.00 70 , .29 2s008.2300t1 NE{'rl r 6 8 91 r S
47791P 5 23 HIIJTON GBITB R 2102 X ARAPAIIOE DR I.ITTT,ETON, C! 80120' IOI 19 RAPIDS ON THE COIJoN,ADO
r|p o6l1al96 AR L212lJ196 45 I GW 6.00 30 71?214,2419rNESr a 5I 91rI
5 23 RAPIITS DEVBIOPUBTT CORPORATION 2102 ll ARAPNIOE DRII'E LITIITRIIOI, C! 80120 II)T 19 RAPIDS ql THE COIORADO
aP o4l1A/OO AU O5l31/O0 39 I Gr l?218,2a39wNESr a 6I 91trS
2t87 5 23 IIESS ALPRED llBtl CASTIJB, Cp 816{7
19 D 7-21L113t d 5.oo 85 55 NESI a 5A 91rl'
22310F 5 23 HTITON GEIB n BO|X 1008 ('ITENrIOOD SPGS, CO 81601
eD 6.lucl.r., Ee n7laol91 39 r Gtrl 18008.1300If Nrgr I 6 I 91 r S
1?0359 5 23 EAILEY ARITIE B(,X laO lrBll CASTIJE, CO 815a?
ND or/29l90 An Os/28l93 3t Gll 100 3018988,0280nmrSr a 6I 91rS1s.00
5 23 TIIII!O}f GEITE R 2102 Il ARAPAIIOE DR LITILEITOII, C! 80120
rD oe/on/e? ^tt L2tL11s7 .s D oll 15aog,112oll lfflsr { 6 Ll r s
115109 5 23 COI,LrXS TEXNEII R 3839 CItTr RD 335 l{Ell CASILE, C! 815a?
39 D L2110132 1.00 Gn 7.00 150 11908,2aa0wsEgr I 58 91rA
2?68{[H 5 23 BITTON OErA R t E]IAR:IECH INC Cln{llD SPRII{OS, CO 81602
na o1t2L19.. {5 Gtl 2o.oo a2 1!grSf a 6a 91ws
22311F 5 23 HTLTON GErE R BOX 1008 GLEl|rloOD 8PG8, C! 81601
Ep 0al29l77 EP O1l10/9? a5 I crll o?508,0075w SISr I 6 I ?1 r S
171gOP 5 23 AILTO!| clllB R 2102 fl ARAPAIIOE DR LITTITETON. Ct 80120 RAPIDS ON TBE C$IrORADO
Ep o6l1Cl95 Bp 0./06/98 .s Cp oll 20.00 82 13 07318.101sr Sllgr I 6 S 91 r S
1779,,F 5 23 BILTOT GENE R 2102 n ARAPIIIOE DR IJIITLEIpN, OO 80120 nAPIDS OIit lgB CIIpRADO
rD o6t1ete6 ED o.to6tee t5 cD (,lt 20.00 82 18 0560S,055{r SIgr I 6 I 91 r S
a77929 5 23 Hr&!ON GENE R 2rO2 fl ARAPAIIOB DR r,rXrLtION, CO 80120 rgr 1 RAPIDS OI{ rIIE CITORAIXI
ND 6./1tlcr ^p 1rl)nlet .q r Of 10.00 80 12 0590S.0102f AflslI a 6 A 91 tl sl
49660F 5 23 nApIDS Olt 1ts8 CIIORADO BOA C/O CEIIE R BIIfliON LIITLAnOX, Ct t0120-3008 RAPIDA Otl nlE CII{'RADO
Np o2l23l9} OC 12118/01 a5 CD (lrr 5o.oo 82 16 o56og,o65ar 8r8rl r 6 g 91 r S
REPORT DATE LZ|LI/O3
PER!,TIT D CO OVINER INFORMA?ION
ACTIVITY STATUS
CD DATE CD DATE
COI.ORADO WEIJIJS, APPIJICATIONS, AND PERMITS
C!I{'&ADO DIVISION OF }IATER RESOURCES
PAGE
IiIELIJ IIEI,I, VIATER SEC IOCATTN TowN
YIEIJD DEPnI LEVEIJ COORDINATBS QTRSI SC SHIP RAIIGE
1ST USED AIINUAIT ACRES GEOIJ
WD MD DB USE DATE APROP IRR AQFR
49551F 5 23 RAPIDS ON TIIE COLOR.aDO IIOA C/O GENE R BIITTON LITTIJRION, CO 80120-3008 RAPIDS ON TBE COIpRADO
ND 0212t198 0C 12118/01 {5 CD Gt{ 80. o0 e2 15 O??1S.101qw Sw: w a ; e or r
5 23 RAPIDS DEVEIOPI.{ENT C1CRPORATION 2102 II ARAPAIIOE DRIVE LITTI.ETON, Clo 80120 IPA 1 nAPIDS oN TIIE clIoRADo
AP O{/18/OO AU O5/31/OO 39 r 1.OO Grf lo.oo 80 12 o59os.o1o2w Swsw 4 6 s 91 fl
21353 5 23 KIMI r Z NEr CeSTtE, CO 816{7
a5 D 08130164 Gn 2^OO 1?O )e SVlStf { 6S 91lls
1214L2 5 23 SI,TYDER F IJ l{Etl CAATLE, CO 81547
5 23 YORX D GIJEIiIIIOOD SPR, C1c 81601
AP 06105/S4 AU O?/os/S,rt 39 G'w NEIIE s 6 s el u
11159{ A 5 23 CHENOWEIIT irIU & SHAROT{ 6197 2L4 RD NElt CASTIE, CO 816t7
NE LOl2Sl19 r-E OAl23lO2 39 D ?-oo 60 12oON.OBIOENEIitE s 6s e1 rc
112000 5 23 I[loRLEf GARY ,, 6503 CoIrNTlr ROID 21{ NEI{ CASTIA, CE 815{7
NP L2lr3l78 RC O3l2tl03 39 (It{oo8oll.ooaoENENE q as qrE
12{501 5 23 YORX D GIrEr{nD SPG, CO 81501
NP 11/18/S1 AR L2l2tl8t 39 lnmGaaolr
112000 A 5 23 }lrlilE DONAITD aTAMES 6503 ROAD 21a NElt CASTLE, CO 816a7
' NP 02111/85 Rc 03/2 412 59 oo8olr.oo{oE I{ENE 5 G s 91 rrr s
5 23 CHENOnETH JrM rEw CASTIJE, C! 815{7
112000 A 5 23 llll,tlE DONAIJD aIeI{ES 6503 ROAD 214 NEll CASXITB, CO 81647
cA 09/o5l9o eA 0?/31/03 39 Gw t5.oo 1{8 12s 4{oos.oo2oE NEtsB s 6 s 91 $
5 23 RtltERY TttoltASA IODD 6503 ROAD 21{ NEw CASILE, C! 815{?
Ar 01/03/92 Aw 04/02192 39 D G-w 44OOA,OO2oE NENE 5 6 S 91 r e
59959P 5 23 RITUERY TllOtlAS 6503 PEACH VALLEY RD t{En CASTLE, CO 816a7
NP 0,!/10/00 sP 09/02103 39 D 0.00 cm 15.00 1a8 122 44oOS,OO2oE NEttE S 6 S 91 r
t7374 5 23 SMrTn H E NElr CASTIJE, C! 816a?
39 D O9l0tl61 d 12-OO ei El WE4GOIE
19060 5 23 IIELTON EVAli, IJESIJIE & FAIIRITENDER ll l, P O BOX 396 CAnBONDALE. C1C 81623
NP 03l03l54 0C ]-213t/96 39 D 02/0816a g{ 10. oo 5532{0S,0172ENENE S 6S elra
66161 5 23 SIllONSOtl CEARIJES BT 1 EOX 107C lilElf CASIIITE, CO 81547
39 Ds 12l21l?2 ctl 11.00 320 65 oBo6N,1t00E xEiIE s G E 91 r
76083 5 23 DENTSON |{ERnITT L. 5501 RD 154 NErf CASTIJE, C9 816{?
39 02/OS/75 Gr 15.00 150 50 0393n.O3938 NENE S 6 s e1 r
8868?5 23 BOnDEIC IIILIJIN,I A. 6303 COIntTlf RON, 211 XET CASTIJB, CO 81647
39 D 04127177 Gtf 15.00 oo?sx.oo3sEriIENE E 6n Olra
139805 5 23 MELIION E NEr[ CASTIJE, CO 81647
NP 05/25184 AP O5l20lg5 39 GElll?l(ao1 E
2L729 5 23 RIPPr ADAIR NEr CeSrLE, C! 816{7
276811{H 5 23 SIIIIACK STBPIIAII t SllEl,TON DRILLING BASALT, CO 81621
ttE o3l2tl95 39 (,r 15.00 100 llflllB 3 6sl el n-
11159a 5 23 CHElrO9rRIrI Jr!,t & SEARON 5397 2ll RD I{EW C,AATLE, CO 816,17
Np 1ol25l?9 39 D 01/01/65 G.rr 1s.00 150 2loON,2oOOE SmirE 5 5 S 91 W
L17723 5 23 OREBN aTERRY Ir & PATRICIA K 6091 COtllTr RD 233 SIIJT, CO 81501
ND Orl15/8? EP O5lO5/89 39 1900N,21508SmlE 5 6S 91r
6?626 A 5 23 RIr}|(t I|ORBERT 6105 CNTY nD 21a NEI{ CASTIJA, C! 816{7
NP 0sl15/89 Glr 13.00 15145 IXt 9014{0N,16378SI{NE 5 5S 91r-
REPORT DATE 12111/03
PERIqIT D CO OVINER INFORI,IATION
ASTIVITT STATUS
CD DATE CD DATE
COI.OR,ADO WEI,I.S, APPI,ICATIONS, AIID PERI.IITS
COIOR,ADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOI'RCES
PAGE
WELL TIELL WATER SEC I,OqATiN IOIIN P
YIELD . DEPrH LEVEIJ COORDINATES Q4rRS SC SAIP RAIIOB !'r
1ST USED NTNUAIJ ACRES GEOI,
ND MD DB USE DATE APROP IRR AQFR
5 23 SUIITACK STEPHEN 2?55 103 RD CARBONDAIJE, C0 81523
Ap 12110/90 Atf O9l10/92 39 Ds Gtl 2550x,2{508 Enr{B 5 6 I 91 n S
5 23 SIIILACK STtsPHEN 2?55 103 RD CARBOII)ALE, CO 81623
Ap 12110/90 Ar O9l10/92 39 DS Gll 2300N.1?508 smB 5 6 I 91 r I
.16?3F 5 23 STiIIIACK STEPHBN 2?55 CO ND 103 CANAONDAIT, Clo 81523 IOT CD SUIIACK EI(EilPTION
Np 08/03/92 BX O9l29l93 39 D srN 130 33808.1{008 8llNB s 6 I 91 r g
5 23 SITILACK STEPHEN 2?55 103 RD CARBOIIDAIJE, CO 81623
416?{F 5 23 SMIIJACK STEPIIEIiI A 2?55 103 RD CARBONDAIJE' CO 81623 IgI AB SIIIIACK E (EI'IP[IOI{
Np o1l28l91 EX 09/29193 39 pS ctt 200 28r09.20s08 gmIE 5 5 I 91 r S
REPORT DATE 12l11/03
-ERilTT D CO OWNER INFORMA?ION
AqTIVITY STATUS
CD DATE CD DATE
COIORADO WEIJLS, APPITICATIONS, At{D pER!,rrTS
COIORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOI'RCES
PAGE
I'EIJIJ WEI'L IIATER SEC IOCAT'N TOTIN
YTEIJD DEIYN{ IJEVEL C@RDINATES TRS SC SHTP RAIIGE
1ST USED A}INUAIJ ACRES GEOI,
WD It{D DB USE DATE APROP TRR AOFR
'.139?5 5 23 NADON R L GIJ$nt@D Spc, CO 81601
242454 5 23 SCHTTTJTZ G,ARI & GArIr 2859 CR 335 NBr CA8Tr,E, @ 816{?
cA 06/03/02 cl 09/19102 45 cw rs.oo 6g 3e o:olx,zresr MWE g C , ,, , ,
58334F 5 23 SCTUIJTZ GAI!, & GARY 2859 CR 335 NEn CAATITE, @ 8164? IPA 2A RI\IER OAKS
NP 07125102 AR 09/16/02 {5 D o.nn rs lq nn <c ro ^,^.N.16.6.*-- ^ - - ^- -- -
53599F 5 23 CEAIISE RO}TAIJD K P.O. BOX 1083 GLBNT@D SPRING, C! 81602
NP 04/20100 sP 06/19102 4s p eooo.oo glr z,oo trs roo osooN,zooos NnNE a a , ,, ,33211F s 23 SCtflrrJ"Z GAny BOX 11s0 crJENw@D spRrMr, cp 81602
33212F 5 23 SC!flTIJTZ GARY BO:( 1150 GLENIiOOD SpRrNCt, CO 81502
332131 5 23 SOTUT,TZ G SLENI|OOD SPRIMT, CO 81502
36879F 5 23 SCHITI,?Z GARY IJ p O BOX 1150 G!'ENTOOD SPOS, CO 81602
NP 04/o6leo 8A 09/04/92 45 Ds o5/22l90 1.oo Gr ls.oo 3{ 12 o3ooN,26o0w NE}n, 8 6 s 91 w oa0639F 5 23 SCEITLTZ CRArG 2556 C! RD 335 NErl CASTLE. CO 816{? r0r c scHInr"Z EXEMPTTON
cA 01/10/92 CA 10/02101 {s p o1l31/92 cr, L4.oo 56 30 4?OOS.3?OOE nEilW 8 6 S 91 r.'
5609?1 5 23 SCI|I|LTZ CRAIG IJ 2655 335 ROAD NEW CASTIJE, C! 815{? IOT 3(C)
NP o8/20l01 4s DI O9l03/92 GOoO.Oo cm a?oOS.3?OOE NBwt 8 6 s 91 I,r
2O631IIH 5 23 RR TRUST C/O DEITANEY & BAIJCOMB GLENNOOD SPGS, CO 81602
Mll 04/30/93 a5 G'w , rnesg a e S 91 W o
APPEIYDD( F
EFFLUENT REQUIREMENTS
TO BE INSERTED:
PRELIMINARY EFFLUENT LIMITS
FROM WQCD
trH:I:IJX?slr
December 2,2003
Mr. Gary Beers
Permits Unit - Water Qualiry Control Division
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Bldg. B
Denver, Colorado 80246, 1530
RE: The Rapids on the Colorado, Site Location Application
Dear Mr. Beers:
MartinAdartin, lnc. is currently involved in the preparation of a Site Location Application and
Engineering Report for the Rapids Development Corporation. The Rapids Development Corporation is
planning a new residential development w€st of New Castle, Colorado in Garfield County, which will
require a new wasterilater treatment facility.
The purpose of this letter is to request preliminary eflluent limitations for the proposed facility, which
will consist of a mechanical treatment plant discharging to the Colorado River. The flow for which the
site application will be submitted is 0.060 MGD.
Please review the attached location map identiffing the desired discharge point, and the additional basic
information required for development of the preliminary eflluent limitations. Please send the invoice for
the application fee to the owner at the address indicated on the attached documentation. If any additional
information is required, please feel free to contact me at (303) 431-6100, or the owner. Thank you for
your att€ntion to this matter.
Sincerely,
@tt
RogerH. Smades, P.E.
Principal
Encl: PEL Application Form
RIIS.jim
Cc: File
12499WestColfax r P.O.Box151500 o Lakewood,ColoradoS02l5 o Telephone:303-431€100. www.madinmardn.oom
CMt Department Fax 3034314028 . Struclural Department Fax 303-431-6866 . Marketing Department Fax 30&45&9923
The Technical Analysis Section analyzes the pollutants of
ln this section, the assimilative capacity of the steam for each
of the POCs is determined using a mass balance calculation or
the Colorado Ammonia Model (CAM) when appropriate.
The Antidegradation Review section determines the assimilative
capacity of the stream for each of the POCs based on Colorado's
Antidegradation Policy.
Further, the PEL will be consistent with the States's regulations and guidance, including
The Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water (5 CCR 1002-31, October 30,
2001), and Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations (June 30, 2OO2) and/or other
applicable guidance. The PEL will conform to the State's style and formatting practices.
The basic information needed for the start of the process to develop a PEL report is
identifi edinthefollowingtable.@"-gr*1thg_EgetrgggtgleE1.er
tl'!g pollqlanls qf co(rgem*cr.lhilresej-vingssyiraffre.q$"merbe.requ-ir.ed-.t9_q-Eg.-bji:Lgt1e -
.-mr"ntti.it.tionl4will.-bg5gqUesled,fl-\Ur-[gthg."plggqmgggpJocgIS;
BASIC INFORMATION NEEDED FOR PEL
@)ur"oifi ed wastewater Treatment plant Compteted on gur"1 //"/ Crr{ueLl
Name
Street Address
city zIP
County
Contact Name
Contact Phone
circteon.'@
Upgrade of existing facility - WQCD Permit No: CO
Discharge isto: Zazo,ezoo ?rrep WBID:co
MGD, ^ MGD
Circle One:
Lagoon System
tocation Maps include point of discharge and attach
P
Latitude and Longitude of discharge point are LA{. 4'Az'Oq'fu f ppu.l/?o3't' ll t' W
Pollutants of Concern (check all that apPly)
/rss
J/ PH
Oil and Grease
7 f C @ecal coliform bacteria)
_-E. coli (coliform bacteria)
{ "fXC (Total Residual Chlorine)
lJotal Ammonia
_ Metals (lis$
Other
lf upgrade is to an existing facility, was a CAM previously done? Yes No
If yes, include the CAM (electonic and paper versions)
Preparation of PEL : Option I - WQCD and Fees
The applicant can request the WQCD to prepare the PEL. Upon receipt of a request,. the
WQCD will issue an invoice for the preparation of the PEL. When the payment and the
required basic information (see above table) for the new or modified plant are received,
ttre WQCp will start work. The PEL will be completed within 30 days, under normal
workload conditions.
The Fee Categories for PELs, as cited below with introductory text, are from Section 25-
8-502 (b.6xl) of the Water Qualiry Control Act (Act).
In accordance with the provisions of Section25-8-702 of the Act, the Division may
.assess a fee for determination of preliminary eflluent limitations uPo.n a domestic
wastewater Ueagnent works, as defined at 25-8-103(5), pursuant to the site localion
annroval Drocess and all such fees shall be in accordance with the following schedule.
Eq:-.E;-Fffiffii, this schedule shall be increased by an amount equal to75o/o of the
il
{}
LandVoyage - Unlimited Maps and Imagery - Aerial Photos - USGS Topo Maps - Satellit... page I of I
--
- i- -"-': r-...
Ii((,
t
, AIgf A4/'68 .
L++n'//unrnrr latr{rrarraoe nnm/deliverv/deliveru ins download.aso?oid=l&Sid=870535&mi... 121212003
THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO
ANITICIPATED PRELIMINARY EFFLUENT LIMITS
PARAMETER LIMIT CRITERIA
BOD, mg/L 30/45 30dayaverage l7 day average
fSS. mq/L 75/100 30 davaveraoe l7 dav average
Fecal Coliform. #/1 00mo 2000/4000 30dayaveraqe l7 day average
Total Residual Chlorine, mg/L 0.5 Dailv Maximum
PH 6.5-9.0 Minimum - Maximum
Oil& Grease N/A Visual
)D( G
-IATA
EVAPORATION DATA
The annual free water surface evaporation rate for this region is approximately forty (40)
inches per year. This information was obtained from the Evaporation Atlas for the
Contiguous 48 United States, NOAA Technical ReportNWS 33.
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Aunospheric Administration
National Weather Service
NCDC: Locate Weather Station-Select Station
& NCOC t Cliawte-Radqr Data fnventories / Loes_te Station / Search
Page I of2
Station List
t0 station(s)fournd in Garfield Coungt, CO,IISA.
Access Digital ASCII Data For This Group of StationS.
select individual station below to access data for that station.
NCDC May Not Have Received Any Data for some of these Stations.
Station Nams
- C-i-ry, State or_Eroyirrce, Country
Period ofRecord
COOP
WBAN
Call
SisE
/ICS
wMo
Type- Countv ID ID
A[teubern
- CO, United States
- Garfield County
0r Jan 1950 Present 050214
Glenwood Spgs #2
- CO, United States
- Garfield County
0l Jun 1950 Present 0533s9
Glenwood Snrinps
- Glenwood Springs, CO, Unircd
States
- Garfield County
ItO DATA
AVAILAtsLE OH LINE
(cllch lo, .ddltlon.l detrll!l
0533s7
Gleuuoo-dlpringslNW
- Glenwood Springs, CO, Unircd
States
- Garfield County
iIO DATA
A\AILAALE OII LIHE
{cllck ror.ddlflon.l dat tt.l
053366
Glenwood Springs 3.SSE
- Glenwood Springs, CO, United
States
- Garfield County
0l Aug 1948 30 Jun 1950 0s33s9
Graad Yalley '
- CO, United States
- Garfield County
0l May
1965
25 Feb l98l 053508
Parachute
- Parachute, CO, United Sates
- Garlield County
0l Feb l98l 08 Jun 1992 05631 I
BiIIc
- Rifle, CO, United States
- Garfield County
l8 Sep 1945 Present 057031 A
Bifl e Garfipld.eounty Airpo r!
- Rifle, CO, United States
- Garfield County
ll Sep 1969 Present 03016 RIL
/I(RIL
ASOS-
FAA
Shoshone
- CO, United $tates
- Garficld County
0l Aug 1948 Present 057618
http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwDl-SelectStation-USA^CO lltZ4DOO3
Colorado Precipitation Frequency Data -- OUTPUT PAGE Page I ofl
Precipitation Frequency Data Output
NOAA Atlas 2
Colorado 39.55oN 107.57oW
Si te-spec if ic Estimates
t{ap Precipitation
(inctrea)
Precipitation
tntenairy (inlhr)
Z-year
6-hour 0.76 0.13
z-year
2 4 -hour 1 .03 0. 04
1UU-
year 6-
hour
L.'t 6 o-29
1U0-
year
24-hour
2.37 0. 10
lydtctGsologisl D...'ga ltrrdhr Cot 8 - llof /Ltiul tl rttrc &ri'o
1325 t .t-tl.rt !l,thr.I' - ailc tt8iag, E 20910 - (!0ll ?1!-1669
tat' D.e 5 1t:39:1t 2OOl
http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/hdsc/na2.perl?qIae39.55&qlon=-107.57&submiFsubmit 121512003
i..10,8,r,;l
Page I ofl
http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/pcpnfreq/co I 00y24.gif t21512003
GLENWOOD SPRINGS # 2, COLORADO Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary Page I of I
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
36.9 42.6 51.3 61.6 72.1
il.6 t6.6 24.3 3l.l 38.2
t.46 r.28 t.42 t.63 t.M
18.4 r1.6 6.6 1.9 0.3
Max. Temp.:90.5Yo Min. Temp.:90.3%o Precipitation:91.7o/o Snowfall: 87.7% Snow Depth: 41.60/o
Check Station Metadata or Metadata graphics for more detail about data completeness.
Westem Regional Climate Center, wrcc@lri.edu
GLENWOOD SPRTNGS # 2, COLORADO
(0s33se)
Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary
Period of Record z lt 2t1900 to 713112003
Average Max.
Temperature (F)
Average Min.
Temperature (F)
Average Total
Precipitation (in.)
Average Total
SnowFall (in)
AverageSnowDepth 5 3 0 0 0(in.)
Percent of possible observations for period of record.
Jun Jul Aug
82.4 88.5 86.r
44.0 50.6 49.4
l.ll t.27 1.50
0.0 0.0 0.0
000
Sep Oct
78.4 66.4
41.8 31.8
1.58 t.47
0.0 1.2
Nov Dec Annual
49.8 38.1 62.9
22.2 t3.4 31.3
l.15 1.30 16.61
5.4 15.3 60.7
031
h@//www.uncc. dri. edu/cgi -bir/cliRECtM.pl?coglen ta9D003
GLENWOOD SPRINGS # 2, COLORADO Period of Record General Climate Summary... Page I of 2
GLENWOOD SPRINGS # 2, COLORADO
Period of Record General Climate Summary - precipitation
Table updated on Dec 3, 2003
For monthly and annual means, thresholds, and sums:
Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered
Years with I or more missing months are not considered
Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons
Winter: Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring: Mar., Apr., and May
Summer = Jun., Jul., and Aug. Fall = S€p., Oct., and Nov.
Str rtion:(u533 is9) GLENWOO D SPRINGS # 2
From Yearl900 To Year2003
Tota Snowfall
Year
I >--
lo.or
b_l lm
E
I
o,so
lm.lm Hish Year
[l;
Io"r']r,l [;t
lo"v'l E,lItulluL
January t.46 6.01 52 0.0c 103 l.3c t9n952 I 5 ((18.4 s8.J 9(
February 1.28 5.t'1 3(0.06 t1 l.3c 07n961 4 I (I 1.6 43.0 3S
March t.42 [ai,fn lo.o4l
=61
m filre4ol rTl 13 r--ir lol [o.61 I 340-6E-l E IE m @ 921@ f-or/re?81 r [3 r L0l 1.el t2.3 45
[M"y I I r,+{[l_s^s3l t-B l-orol ll E I-ot/2oE [f [3 E f0 E rc n
June I I r.1l ll 4.e21l6e 10.99J (ll3.201| 24ne6el tsl t3t I li l0l I 0.01 L 1.01 76
Julv 1.2'/4.51 s/0.00 I 1.80 281t931 4 I 0.0 0.(I
August I E IE a @1 75 @ [!f3 r [T [q.ql tod l-l
:r L l.5t 5.3t 6l 0.00 I 1.93 04n982 5 I (0.0 3.C 2C
October t.4i 4.21 84 nnn 52 2.00 08n924 6 A I c 1.2 19.0 I
November t.1J 2.89 8(nnn 4 l.l 10t2002 6 A 0 C 5.4 28.0 l9
December 1.3(4.45 5r 0.17 76 t.4i 30/r951 8 A 0 0 15.3 61.(83
Annual 16.6r 26.48 95 8.28 66 t.2c t9690624 86 53 I 60.1 I t9.J 5l
Winter 4.0s1 tt.32 s2l 0.9r 771 r.471 lgsl lx0l islt T4l [-il ral 45.2 ErsJ l- 3el
Sorins 4.49 10.88 78 0.78 I 1.78 19780401 23 t4 I 0 8.8 37.C 29
Summer 3.88 8.61 43 1.18 t02 ,.2C 19690624 20 t2 I 0 0.c l.c 76
Fall 4.relI 8.601 I 701 l0.e4ll I 12.ooll 192410081 lel l3ll 2l 0il 6.611 30.01 l9
http //www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliGCStP.pl?coglen t2t9t2003
GLENWOOD SPRINGS # 2, COLORADO Period of Record General Climate Summary... Page2 of 2
Wes tern Re gi onal Climate C ent er, wr c c @dr i. e du
http://wunv.wrcc.dri. edu/cgi-bin/cliGCSIP.pl?coglen
STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS and WATER QUALIW STANDARDS
REG0i{: ll
B^sil: LOTUER COLORADO RfvER
D.!h Clr.ficdoB Nrn ERrcsT lroARDs TEMPOMRY
MOO|F|CATIOIIS
AND
CII,ALIFIERS
PltYsrcll
rnd
BBOGICAL
INORGANE
m,
METALS
rroi
S'lonsaerncd Dc.crlp0dr
t. /t/bilIElr dcob..(b Ri,r.frfii G. @nfiLlE
./ ulurD. tu rhe Fdt Rlyubttrllrdbbly b.low
' th. aonft.Eraa rl0r Pa.drt5 GaalL
Aq tlr! Cold t
Raolr0on la
w.i!rSuFly
rerhrnm
D.o..c.oq,
O.O.(.pF7Oilen
pl{.t.3-9.0
F.Cd.Dormtl
EColrl2Grlm
NH,(*tsT\rs
t{t{(crt)'o.02
Cl,(!cFo.0reqaciFo.otr
cr@.m5
9.0.002
8.O.75
Nq-0.06
ilOrrl9
Clr250
Scl-.WS
A{lcFn,trrlc'
C{t(rcFWqtl
Cd(drFn S
Cdll(rcFsofir*)
C64!crdrFTVS
aril-HrLtl/S
ra(aFwqqE,
F.(drFt000(Il!c)
Pb(sc/t$FWS
iln(ch)rvYs(d.)
Mn(!d(,iFTVS
|lotcrrFO-Oltbll
N(tGmF r v!
SdtcrcfiFn S
^g(.cFn,sAe(G,lFwqr)
Zn(.crciFn/8
babr, lha driufla Sr PrrachrbcEd( b
llrmdl.brytbotr rroo'fi,it6dfhr
G.nnboo Rhfr.
Raarlrlhn la
Wliu SuFly
Aglartm
o.o..s.omg,l
pH r6.&9O
FCd.UlOlM
ecor.lzcfih
Nq(cnF0.06
O,(*F0.019
Cl2(chF.ol'l
CN-O.ms
BrO.75
ilq'0.05llo"l0
cl.250
SO.'wS
a(eFnlrrs,
Cd(.crdrFWBq[(.cF50(TrE)
Crvl(lcrdFTVS
Crr(*,bhFTVS
F.(drFWqdb)
rqqFrul{ rE,
Pb(ed.rrFT\6
iln(crtF"WqdE)
r*{d.rrFTVS
ngtqrru.srlu,
N{re,tfiFTVS
Sdtc,thFTVS
Ao(rar.rrFTVS
Zn(.crdrFTVS
!bov! lha car{t clE orlr, Gunnbon Rltlrb
lh.Coao.l(bt ih rt t tr..
RaqraUon la
AerlqrlirE
O.O.($F7O nfn
pH. C.S9O
FCol.20ol(ntl
ECot.l2Gllm
Nll.(.riFO.00
ctr(&Fo.o10
Ct2(drp.ol'l
cl{'o.m5
8r0.75
l{Oi'o.05
Cd(.c.rdFWl)
C.lll(tcHrFT\,s
CrrqlcdrFn/s
Cu(rc,urFn,S
Pb(.c,t$FTVS
Mn(rcrdrFn,S
Hc(dr)d).0r(bl)
S.(ecrdrFTVS
A0(.dchFTVS
zr(lcftiFTtB
Cd6..b Rhr.r nom fi.c.nltxrE {0r th.
Ro..frg Fdi Rhra b. Dolri hor.d.idy mu
lh. 6lfirsrrl0r Fdub Crt t.rc.pa fa
0l..p.dc f.eEoh S€[ttnb ab, 6,t 7, A g
t0. lt. - h.f,rd 12.
Rccrralbn 2
wrbrsrmly
Ae,ldrtlr
O.O.(.pFT,ilen
pH'6.$9.0
F.Cd1200lOrl
Eoalifildtm
N}lt(.rrF0.02
Ct(lcF.or9
Cl2{drF.oll
CN.o.m5
830.75
t{q'0.0t
t{O..'10
Ct 25O
SO..wS
cd(rc,uFTr/s
Crll(&F50(fl*,
C'vl(.cdrFn,s
Cu(rc,UtFWS
F.(drFr0o0(f,!c)
Pb(lcrcfiFWS
lln(drFWSId.)
frr(.crdrFn s
xs(ci).O.ot(br)
S.(rclutFWS
^g(.crdlFTVSZn(.ct$FTvS
firodllcaton:
Sa..xbdng mblenl
$,'ltly
Erplra0on dsL of
2f20tos.
Racraalbn la pll't.5€.0
F.Col-200lm
Ecol.l26llqn
N}t(ch]d.00
Ct(rcFo.or9
CqdrFo.orr
crqr.0o5
Cq!c,BrFTvtl
Crfi(rFoff,t)
Cd/l(.c/drtsrvs
CdlefdrFT\6
Pb(erdrFTVB
ilr{.a,t rFfvs
tlg(drFo.or(bl)
s.(.c,UtFTVS
Ae(el$Fn S
Zn(mrdrFTVS
ratrtda. ld(.a ard ,raayoarr uilch rDrlOJn
lh. ldmdrb! d Whlb Br,.r t{.tbnC Forit
m9l k h. rFcfllc f.dlreh S.firrnl 9.
Racrtdon tb
Wr!.r&mly
Art ulin!
O.O.(!DF7Oildr
pll.a.+0.0
F.Coarfilsfl(HECotArJtm
Nlt(drFo.02
C[(.cF0.0te
Cl2(drF.oil
CN.O.005
8.O.75
l0'r0.Oi
NOrrf0
cF2so
8o..wS
cqrcFwqr,
Cd(chFwlt
Crll(!cFflrFrt)
crv{eHrFtvg
Or(&dtFTVS
Fr(drFt(mFllc)
Po(rc,brrFTVII
rrt{ch).Wsil.t3}
lft{*r.rrFwtt
ilc(c,lFo.or(u)
s.(.cdtFnS
At(.cFlvtl
Ae(chFwqr)
zr{.c,tfiFTl/s
liom boud.ryoMfria RhrrNdoml Fo.!!i b
lh. codimx,ilr lh. Glo.ldo Rhf,r.tp
Racrra0on lb
W.t r&rF
AerlorU|!
O.O.(!gF7oilerl
pl{tc.5€.0
F.Cd.ta$(m
ecor€Yl(m
l{f[(.fitso.@
Ct(rcF,.ot9
Cr4drF0.01r
cN{.005
a{.15
,,1O.'0.05ilq'io
ch2!o
SO.'wS
Cd(rcFnqtl
CqchFn,s
Oll(rcFSOGr.c)ql4lcrdrFns
qr(.cErFI\rS
F{.,iFlooo(fltc)
Pb(.crchFWS
llt(ch).ws(ds)
',n(EdrFT\rSlt(chp.or(tr)
S.(rcErFT\rS
MlcFT\rS
Ae(GfiFwqrl
Zr(.olchFT\6
UdAhTI,R
Olr,lda. Br[r, C.dI' and Be.trn Craea
hdudne { !tuH... r.oarb. k tld
,uJrrol1 iotr0l. lcrrdfyo,lh.wtu RlY.f
N.lh rC Fo.tal b tha] ooniuru slit ir
CobrdoRtuu.
Raclta0oa|la
W.icrSl'Dl,
Aertcdrm
Lt .Cd I
O.O.(.PF7Onten
pl{.6.t{.0
F.Cdrz00lffi
EOol.l20tqn
Ntt(.rt).o.oz
CL(.CF.0'19qadrF.ori
cr{r.qr'
H r-hlt S
g4.rt
l$Or'O.Os
S.'10
cr250
80.rry3
cd(eFrvqf,
Cd(.iFnSqil(&F5o(IDCI
C r[EehFnls
Cq.c,6FwS
ldrtwlrl
r{6Frt rr.( rc,
Pb(*&htsTl/s
lh(GhFttS{d.)
lit(*,lrtFwS
]tg(chr.0.0r(bi)
EJAt&iLI
$(EEFlYe
Ag(.cI,T\,|s
Ag(chFwqf)
ZrocrdlFTVS
E#L?VS
mgrlwlEW.reE
rs\rott tom n- arca b lha oarlr.,rc. flrhEdradC.FotdPrdrrac..*.
L kJEftHHlfud*l*
wa
W.lr&!Fl,
Ae,lc*n
u.v{.Prr! mutr
plFG.5-0.0
FCd.zoolonl
EColr.golqH
n6ilnd
mrr16P.u
CU.cFr.o!9
ct2{drFo.otl
ctH.@6
l0l ,-LTlrs
Ery.tt
Nq'0.05
Nq'ro
Cr.60
EO.'w8
Cdm
cd(dlFr\6q0(cFFtc)
C rl(&i,lFTvE
ar(elilFws
MALIA,V?nl
FqqFilElrG,
PD(.crcftFT\rS
lfi{ch}.Yl,S(d.}
It{.ardtFWS
HCohFO.or(b.l
FJdibtOaD,lm!
Ac(lcFWS
AeGfiFwqbl
Zr(.archFnAt
HILTI,S
25t.
pwurqt
Aorlort !e.v.tryr', rur
pt{.O.54.0
f.Cdralo'l@ltl
Ecoltcl0lqH
CLFcF.oro
CE(drHLoll
CN'O.dxl
Nq'0.06 cd(6Fn s
Crll(.ddrFn,8qv'{r/urFn,8
qr(lcrd|FnE
rrl(IfthFwS
tt(cftFo.ol(50
tfllcrdrFws
S.(rcElFn B
REGION: ll
BA]Srl: LOWER COLORADO RNER
D.!lo Clr.rl06ilm NI,MERIC STANOARA9 TEMPORARY
MOOTFTCATTONS
AND
C'I.,ALIFIERSPHYSICAL
,rd
BDLOGICAL
INORGANE METALS
Sb!.lnscgrn .f O..crlplbn
9b. Alllakceendltlfvotrtlbut rybfhoCotor.(b
Rlsr hom lha cil[uaE ol tha Colordo ail,
fia Rocrlie Fdt Rlw b lhcconnu.E ofth.
Colaado Rlrtrard P!r!.hn CG.lq hdudhg
R{bG0 R..fiorrnd HmEyGlp R.!.nok,
dc.pl la |116 and rffillt h !.gm,rb 5.
C. 7. t. 10. lt .-lr erd 12
AqLlbCoE r
Racrtr0on la
WdrSrFly
Aefhfhm
D.O.'6.0 rln
D.O.(!9)-7O trqn
pH'6.$o.0
F.Cd'arolffi
EOoa-i2cfiffi
NHt(rcFTvS
NHt(chF0.02
cl,(rc){r.0r9
Cl2(ctFo.oil
CN'0.0(x1
s{r.(x,l
B-0.75
Nq'o.05
NOt''10
cl3250
SO.'wS
A.(.cF50(fEc)
Cd(scFwqf,
Cd(crrFTvS
c'll(eFso(Trr)
&M(.crciFn,s
Cr{lcdiFTVS
Fa(.fi).llrs(dls)
F{drFr000firrc,
Pb(erdrFn S
M(.rrF!rvs(d.)
lrr{rcrdtFn S
Ho(crrF.o'l(bi)
N(.ddrFTVS
S.(.ddrFTVS
&(.cFTvS
^e(chFwqr,Zn(ecfrtFn S
10. lilalililm ol Rl0. CEct. hchrtng.l ttuEl.l
uauand3. Lba and 'tlanalB. ftomc{rmly
Ro.d 25t b th. 6.dlu.rr. dfh ihc &to[do
Rlvlr.
Aq Ll!! qold I
Rmrlbo'1.
W.|!?&rFly
Ae'lalhm
u.v.E.u nl,r
O.O.(!PF7.orle,l
ptt'G.$9.0
F.Cd',2001m
E.Col{zG/t(H
NrtlsF r vo
N}l'(drFo.02q!(rcF.0r9
Cl2(.hFo.oll
CN.0.o(xt
B{r.75
Nq'o.05
Nq3ro
O.2io
SO..WS
q.erurrE,
Cd(rGFllr'qlrl
Cd(drFn S
Crlll(rFso(TEc)
Crv(rc&hFTVB
Cu(*rdrFT\6
rqutrrrqeE,
F.(drFromG]!c)
Pb(&rdlFWS
Mn(ciFwqdb,
Mn(*/thFT\,S
Hs(dt)-0.0r(br)
S.(.crchFTVS
AS(.cFT\rS
Ao(drFwqr)
a(rofctF?\rS
hcrrdng dl ttirtr.l:q fr". ttr.o*;lT/V;
Fod( F.lbi rrlnsbm., E.d Fod.ol P..!chua.
CG.X thoflt. poani tilmdlrtrly b.low0l. rmutr
orFH Arirr{ O!.t b thc -!t bdrdr.ytna o,s?.rs.Rsw.
Rmldon2
lv.tlt Susly
Ae,hiltur.
O.O.(!pFrO mgrl
p+{lc.S9.0
F.Cd=20@l(xlltl
E.Col{3(I1(H
Nrq(.hF.02
cL(rcFo.or9
Cl2(chFo.orl
cNd.(xrs
8.0.75
Nq'0.05
ilOt.'10
cl'eio
SO.'WS
Cd(.cFTvqrl
Cd(crrFI\,S
Cdl(!cF5O(TrE)
c.VI(lctdrFn/s
Cr(*rdrFTVS
F.(cfiFr0(n(T8)
Pb(rchFIrrS
lwch).ws(ft)
Mn(rcldrFT\rS
Hg(cfiF0.0r(bl)
S{rcrdrFTVS
As(rcFns
A0(chFws(r)
Zn(scdrFTVS
fmm W.rt Fod( Frll!bllra mlt arcauiltlMrrb ol!.k mlm!.n d 0r. l,0ddb Fat
ot P.6ctxrb cfat fumihc nortt borndary &r
o, Sr9, T5S, R95W b ft. corilltrnc rilr Elrt
iilddc Fotdfur:Orr*.
I'P
Racrartbn 2
AtdcullrE
D.O.(!pFT0rE/l
pHr6.5-9.0
F.Col{@l@d
E@t{it0tffi
NOJ.oFIO
)rot(.cFlOO
B.(.rrFrOo(rr.c)
Cd(drFtO(fr.c)
CrlUchF'100(f,!c)
Cu(ciF20o(f,!c)
Pb(.fiFr00fir8)
Mn(chF2ql(Irtc)
S.(.rrF2o(f]!cl
Z{chF2(,(x}frr.c)
Crt llndJdlr!.f ttr ltd- 0,rdtd!s O.rL
Gtldr md ftuEc.), liom lh..qrc.b th.
no,l lol.(lry lr. dSlg,I5g FgtV.
t,P Rac6r0o.r 2
AgrlarttL
O.O.(8PFTO'l[n
ptH.5-9.0
F.CdrZlot(I,rl
E.Col!'d'dlm
t{O,(.cFlO
Nq(rcFr(t(,
B.(chFrm(rr!c)
Cd(.riFro(rr!G)
Crll(chFl00(TrE)
Cr4d|Fzoo(fnc)
Pb(cftFt00(fr!c)
r/h(dlF200(rrt)
S.(chF2o(rrtc)
a(cnF2000(Tr!c)
CG.L. Inctdlto Cl tlbutrrh.. frilt lrt .oura b
lh. @dlu.ncaxllh illdd.Fod( of Plrrdub
Cmlq rlrfrrbfi a, f,0d.t Fori dParachrb
Ctcclrlhonrihc odksrcc rath Erl l$(!lr
Fo* b. @llmmdlrd, rbov. ttr
coriumcadll tha W.d Fortolkedub
Cllrk.
Racraroon 2
Aed.ult !D.O.(eFTo,rterl
pH: C.$OO
F.Cd.20@t@nl
ecol{3olfiH
N4(dF0.02
Ct(acFo.org
Clqchp.olr
cNto.(n5
8r0.75
ffo,'0.05
Cd{!cFWqt}
C.r(.fiFWE
Ctll(tcrd)r5o
CrVl(.crclrFTvg
Cu(&lcfiFTVS
Pb(rc,bhFn,S
Mn(!c,rdrFTVS
He(chFo.01(bt)
N(!c./crtFMl
S.(.cehFT\6
Ae(dlFwqr)
a(rd.hFTVS
Prrdx,b Or.L wl0lln $GilonaZf.20,.rd 29,
T5S.RGW.
TJP Rm.ion2
WrirrSudy
Aellcdtu'.
O.O. (!pF7.0 rngn
pH. C.5-9,
F.Cdradt(n,rc
ecor,Grol(H
Mr,(acFl0
NCrr(acF!q,
Bc(drFrm(rcc)
Cd(cfiFto(l'tc)
Crll(drFrqffrE)
Cu(chF2qr(r]!c)
ry.$Fr00(fr!c)
lrn(drF2m(T.c)
S.(chF2oFrc)
&(chF2000(L!c)
from lh.u.d bond.rf lfir. of s29. T!ts. RSW
b th. oodfrac. uilr lldd. Fod( o, Pildrub
Crtak
R.craa0fi 2
w'trrSuFly
Aerlcillirrt
D.O.(QF7O,ng6
ptl . t.$9O
F.Colt2OqYl(Dfl{
E.Col{Col(m
illL(drF0.o2
Cl,(tc).O.oro
Cl2(drF.0'11
cN{t.@5
B{t.75
l{O'-0.05
ilo'.tO
O.250
SO.'WS
cd(.cFIWt)
Cd(chFn/S
Cdl(tcrt5o0ttc)
Av(tcrchFn S
Ct (ladrFTvs
FdchFr000(rlB)
Pt(lcrdrFTVS
Mdch).ws(&)
r,t{*/6FWS
HC(drr{1.0t(B)
S.(rc,6FnS
Ag(rcFn,s
^e(crrFWqb)Zr(lcrdrFryS
STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS and WATER QUALITY STAI'IDARDS
M,TlERlcSTANOAROS TEMPOR^RY
MOO|FlcATloNs
ANO
OUALIFIERS
REGIOi{: lt
BASIN: L€h,VER COLORADo RN,ER
Oc.lg Cblcio.tol!
PHYSTCAI
.rid
IIOLOGEAL
I]{ORGANE
tun
METALS
t,Ell
Strns.grn dth.ctlPdot
tlC. A,thr0t lcbE lFai PEchrtlcEd(m
0: 6fi !b.ol0ra Eaa Fort Prrdrlrlt Crlat
nDm. Fkf ffihd, b.bt, Fd AnYll Cf!.l
b th. conittltc. dth Pr.6ul C'.dq .[
ttut.ll.. b E rdrrb Crtd( dr th. di.ld.
d Pr.drlJt CEd. fiom. PddlmdL0dY
b.bw0f, Ad Fdt otEr.dxrb Cttd(blha
co.ilhrltc dft fhacolo?rro Rhar: atd tl
tlbrrbrt a b Ot Colora& Rli,rrdl ira lE 0r
rlrt otth. qoilb Rtutr lilmr Pdltr
hmdrbly bdil Oddiloodcn l b 0l
codt itcar{ir Pardnb Clt.k
Aq tlb Cold 2
Racrrdlon 2
A0rLilfr.rt
D.O.. !.O'll! l
O.O.(.pF7rtne/|
pHGc.5{.0
F.Cd1400.,tq,frl
E.col<'lYl(Etl
9.(,. r O.O mItr
D.O.(.pF7o rl9l
pHrG.$0;0
FCdt(lslloril
Ecot{r5fi(m
cN(eFO.Z
NCrr(loFl0
iaq(.cFr0(,
8(chp.75 A{drFrs(llt,
B.(drFr00G.tc)
CqdrFro(lttc)
Crll(cftFr@fit*,
CrVl(drFr(E(Iltc)
Cu(chF200Fncl
PD(.rrFrooFrlc,
itr((,l800fit!cl
'qdrF2(p(rt.G)S.(drFaofirlc)
Z{chFz(,ooFr!c)
Nllrl*F I v!
Nlrt(.hF0.m
Cl(rc)-o.oto
Ct2(drF0.ori
cil.0.mo
8.0.73
Nq'0.03
Nl@FrwlrlE,
cd(rctsWgt,
Cd(drFWS
CrlUlcrchFnAl
Crl(tcfiFwSqr(.c,UrFn t
rc(cnFrurl l @,
Pb(.c/t rFWS
ri{*/chFn S
rt(drFo.0i(br)t{(EdrFlll
S.(lcrdrFn,S
Ae(!cFIvs
Ao(drFwqtl,h(rdrdhhwstlh. MaLldamoa Pa?adrfa Cru.t frtr lha
csriuf,lc. of lh. W..l.id EitFortt b tr
coniurrcc {rh tha ColotdoRhrar.
AqWWZ
Rrc'tcion fb
Aeddtura
B'0.75
l{o'.o.05
NO'.ro&w
Cd(lcFirqt)
Cd(drFn/sqll(EdtFn,8
Crfr(.crdtFtvs
Or(.ddiF7\rS
Pb(.crchFTVll
rfr{.cltiFws
Hs(chF0.0(u)
tq.ardrFWS
s.(.oHrFn/s
Ae(chFrlqo
Zr(.cErFn S
,tq@w I
Racna0on 2
Addoftrlt
O.O.(!?F7Omgi
DH.C-$o!
F.Collzooorrol,lrl
ECor-GrO16
r*r,(chF.aE
Cl(tcFo.ol9
O2(chts0.01t
crH.005
lb rd,r6 ba pohl tn,tdlrblY b.brirl
,iodrdFh^rdCr.*
rdilN. ioot a DdnaMHYb.brlh.
corturE dP.rrtuhO..tb!r
Colqdo^rtlt bodar.E Of b Sr..g.cilc
a.lltga h s.gnuf. fS irorfh fe.
tP R.crrdo.r ll
Aerlafrrt
t+l'G5-eO
F.cd.{a5llOrI
E-6lr205llG
taO.(acFl0
ilq(.cFlO
E (drFrdtGtE)
CqdtFro(fr!c)qlqdrFr@Gt c)
Cn(ciF2(trfir.c)
ft(drFrooFt c)
[r(chF2mGtE)
S.(chF2o[rlE)
a(chF2ooo(Ittc)
r.fbr.h. I'qrt !.Gotrulln { fiC*ra Cl[l
Olvlfrb.t b r pffi ltlild@, b.brs.li
Crtah rrof,igtdd nmth. Gol,!ilttnf
Hghh. C.ml; lh.dt d ffc Clrl No. a
@fi, fl.! D'!h s&aolEr.ld !r
no.fhot Cdondo il.do.rtl tibfirmat
boundf,r..!opl b lcdtc L{ngt h s.eflt il
llc
t,P RGt ibn ta
Aedarnm
pH. G.5€!
F.Cd.aooflqlrreool.!ztllffi
fatt(drF0.6
Cl.(.cFO.or0
CA(drF.otr
CN'O.{105
8.0.75
iro,{.05
cd(.crdrFnl
qf,(.c,drFTVE
C n(.ctltFT\6
qr(c,brtFwS
Pb(.cErFWB
k{.cdtFWS
l{g(drFo.0t(bt)
il{elurFWS
s.(lcrchFwB
A(GrdrFTt,s modftcatbG:
s.(cnts a.0ng
.mblcnt qEllty
bra.d m
unc.fLlnty.
PcBhpw'Shftom
Grrrd Junclbn
dEafirrll io
@niljcE!r{thlhc
Coloodo Rl6; tnd
Uil. Sln wsh fDn
F rrt! dbcrrtlP b
co0lt cm ltth th.
Colo6do Rlv.'b
D.o.. F. Coll.. NH..
Cd, Cu, A& tll, B,
Hs, Nq'cfi6ng
qu.0iY.
E4arldon &!. oa
2nuos.
Rlcrtalqr la
Ae,lorin
pH. C54O
F.cd.zilnlDil
E.ool.l2flffi
l$l(dt).0.0c
cq(.cpor0
CE(dt!.o.fir
ct{tO.Os
B{r.75
irq{.05
Cd(.o,dtFT\rB
Crlll.oftllFn,ls
Ov{ddtFnisq{.cr!hFn,8
Pt(romFnE
rr{ddtFnA
llg(crrFollt(ul
ifidchFn,s
8.(.cEtFWs
Z{.oErFn 8 nldttcalbna:
S.(dtF.i!ilry
Jrdcnl qu*ty,
bar.d on
moartrlnty.
Explr.0dr dtc ol
2nan9.
10
STREAM CLASSIFIGATIONS and WATER euALtw STANDARDS
REGEN: It
BASIN: LOI/UER COLORA@ RNER
MC ChEcltdom NUMERIC STAI{DARDS TEMPORARY
itoolFtcATtoNs
AND
QUALIFIERSPI{YSICAL
!nd
EIOLOGEAL
INORGANE
fio,
MEIALS
tClSbrlm S.gmrnI D..crlp0on
14.. M.h.bm of Ron Clt.f iradfrg * rmOenOg.
' ttuir.ba. hkaa" and r-,rEfr. frun lr rourcab. pohf hi.dlil.ly Oolr. lh. orilulrc.
wl0rCt cctt k
Aq Lffc Cdd r
Rrcrlatlon lb
W.tc. Supply
AOloJt rt
O.O.d.orllrl
O.O.(?F 7.0 ng,l
pH.6.i-9.0
F.Cd.3E$m
ECol:ar5flm
NntlsF r Yu
ts{(cnF0.o2
C[(acFo.0r9
Cl2(ch).o.orl
CN.O.O05
D{.WZ
B-0.75
ilO"O.05
NOr-tO
Cl-250
SO.TWS
qmFso(rEG)
cd(rcFwqo
cd(drFws
Ctlll(!c).6o[frE)
Cdl(rcrdtFTVS
C0(!G/UTFrvS
F{dFroqxTrtc)
Pb(*/ttFwS
ilr{cnFWS{dl!)
lln(!cl(,lFT\ls
ru(ch)'o.or(bt)
S.(!d.fiFn,s
Ao(BFTVA
As(chFwqr)
Z{rcrdrFTvS
fira6rFTw
Sq.ckhFwSi
Ae(*mFTVS
Zd.c,t rFT\6
w q lffi urtor tncfrohg tI tltubll.c.
ryloand!. lts and 't iElr!. frcma polntlilndb0rlybdiln ooaiu.ncarllh CLt
Crrat lo lhamtlr.nca dlh tha Colaado Rlu-
Raorlr0oa tD
WrLr Sudy
Ail,larttrt
pll't.$o.0
F.Col.3rl5/lOrt
e.Ool'20tll([r{
Nn leF r va
Nlt(dtFO.0C
cL(.oF.o19
Ct2(drF.01l
ct{.o.005
8.0.75
NOrr{r.05
tlO,'rO
Cl.25O
SO.=wS
NlqrF rqrl r E,
Cd(rcrchFTvtt
C.ll(erdrFT\6
Cn4(.c,tfiFWS
C{tarchFrvs
F.(drFr000firrc)
Pb(e/t |FWS
lft{6Fll6(dls,
litl(adchFTVS
Hs(chFo.0r(H,
r4rNlrurl.@GEwmlt[
mut! Ladar&, U(c1md lraarvoka.from
nt ror!rca blha coriluanoawl0t tha Oolorr&Rlw-
Racrralbn ta
W.LrSrrply
Aedoitrr.
D.O.(!pF r.0mfrl
pllr6.$9.0
F.Cd.'2001ffi
E.Col.l20lffi
Nn (drFo.O,l
CL(lcFo.oro
Cl2(.rr).O.0lr
CN'O.m5
I'O.76
NO..g.Ot
ltKl''16
Cl'250
SO..wS
q.wrqrtE,
Cd(.cFWqt,
cd(chFn,s
Ctll(rF5o(r!c,
c,vrccrchFi/S
Ct{erchFTVII
! nltrltqvE,
Fc(cfiFlo@(Irtc)
Pb(trdFwS
Mn(ctFWS(ds,
Md.crdFI\rS
rE(.fiFo.0r(btl
S.(rcrchFn/8
Ag(rcFT\6
As(dlFr:t/lqtr)
Zn(lc/btrFT\6
r,leE!.,r!e rrys e-^r nuwnrg ar6hriti.., s0m&. bt . fi, tuGr!rc}|. ltorn[r arta blh. coniuarEarllh lha Oolaldo
Rlvar.
Rccrladon lb
WaLr SuFl,
A0rldrt rr
pfl-t.ffO
F.Cd.axnm
E.Col.r2Olm
Ntt!(chF0.Ol
Cl,(!c1r0.019
Cl2(.tFo.orl
CNr0.lxl5
B{.75
Nq-o.os
Er'lO
Cl.25O
SO..WS
C{r(.cFWqr)
C.r(dlFWS
C.fl(*ts500r.c)
Cd/l(.c,6Fn l
Cr{rc,bhFn,s
Fc(.fiFl,lrs(dL)
Pb(!c,bhFn,s
Mn(.fiFwqft)
iflerchFn S
llg(.fiF0.0t(8,
M(ft&hFwS
AegcFT\6
^e(chFwqt)Zr(.c/tfiFT\rs
9c rrte, nusrry.tr
tbi,t.tfla, 80.nd., bkas rd turEts, ltom
llt aotru b tilrrdfrly b.b, fra corfirrlcarllr ,f.y Pr... Cllak
Racnadon lb
W.LrSuFly
Aedorltm
O.o.(!pFTOnUl
pH. C.SoO
F.Cd.3lYl(H
E.Coar205flm
t{tt(dtF0.@
Cl,(rcF.or0
cl2(cnFl.oll
CN.O.0O5
BrO.75
},(rrd.05rc.'lo
Cl.250
SO,'WS
F.(cnFr000(TItc)
Pb(&tttrFT\6
ri(chFws(dr)
lrn(!c,t rFTVS
ils(drF0.0r(bt,
S.(rcrdFn S
Ag(tctsr\rs
Ae(drFilqr)
Zt(rc/bhFn S
aur rur e p*rmnarimy'6d ;t
cmirriEc ofth. Cda!(b Fvlr.nd peldxrb
Clt.i b th.Coaor.dGt t h bonf.r.
Racrraoon r,
Agdqil&r.
,lFC.6-9.0FCd.al0l(H
E.Col42Anm
N4(cn).0.00
CL(rcFO.oto
Cl2(dr)Eo.olt
CN.0.il15
8.O.75
NOr=O.OS
Cd(.cErFWS
Crll(.o,t rFT\rS
cnn(rc/6FT\A,
C{t(rctiFn6
ry&lchFWSre{.chFTVS
Hg(.rr1.0.0r(u)
N(rcr.ftFWS
Sqm,UtFn S
a(.archFTVS
11
Exhibit 23
ENARTECH tnc. Consutting Engineers and Hydrologists
-\NVZ,Z-
-ZlN-
^ZIB\.
This tener is to provide certification for the placement of fill material in accordance with theGarfield County Floodplain Special Use Permit for the Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision(Resolution 97-26' copy enclosed). I, Peter Belau, a Colorado registered, professional
Engineer, hereby ceni$ the following:
l. The "as-built" etevation of the fill placed on l-ots l, z, 3, 4, s, 6, 7l , g, g,lo, l l, 12,
16, !7, and 18 of the Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision is above ,n, Lrcr.,i;r; il;100-yeir flood, effectively.removing the building envelopes on these lots from the
. I00-year floodplain of the Colorado River.
2' The fill material was placed in accordance with the engineering.speciflrcations for this
type of floodplain development, including the compaction of tl.-nrf -rt.ri.i. t : - -- ---
Please note that the Special Use Permit has a number of additional requirements, including thatthe lowest floor, including basement, of any residence must be at least I foot above the
100-year flood elevation.
Sincerely,
ENARTECH, INC.
December 30, 1998
Mr. Gene R. Hilton
2102 West Arapahoe Drive
Linleron, CO 80120
RE: The Rapids
Peter Belau, P.E.
nf{rw
Enclosure
cc: Mark Bean
E-mail: belau@rof.ner
P4234t DOCS1PJB98\423 Ir c Hihon r23098A
fi2 Eighth Street; suite 325 P.O. Dnier 160', Glenwood springs, colorado 8t@2 (g7o) 945.236 Fax (g7o) g45-2g77
,il,8
rft
trlr
!I
ri
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Project:
Location:
Subject:
Glient:
The Rapids on the Colorado
Garfield Goun$t, Golorado
PRELTMINARY - WWTF Costs
Rapids Development CorPoration
Date:
Job No.:
Prep. By:
Ckd. By:
2-Dec43
16454.C.01
JJM
RHS
MARTIN /MARTIN
C!ONAULIINO ENO]NECRA
Nrt", A"y "ptri."" of price, probable proiecl costs or conslruc{on costs rendered by ti,lARTl}'U[,tARTlN reprcsent
lts best ludgment and ar€ lumished for general guldance. MARTIN/MARTIN makee no watfianty or glarantee'
either expressed or lmplied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bld or actual Gost.
Batch Reactor
run dato: nf21n003 9:19 PM Pagol ofl
Project: The Raplds on the Colorado
Location: Garfield County, Golorado
Subfect: PRELIMINARY - VVWTF Costs
Client: Rapids Development Gorporation
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Date: 9-Dec-03
Job No.: 164S4.C.01
Prep. By: JJM
Ckd. By: RHS
MARTIN/MARTIN
gONAUL?INE ENAINEER8
$
93,924.00
rundats: l?gn0fJ,33:32PM Page I ofl
APPI,ISITONI,gR SIIE APSBOyAL FoR CONsrRUCrroN or:A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER M
APPLICANT: RaoldsDevetoomentCorooratlon(RDC|PHONE: (303) Z9B-t640
ADDRESS: 2102 Wcrt Areorhoe Itrlvc
CITY, STATI ZIP: Llttleron. Cotorrdo. E0120-3tDt
Conrutdng Engtu*r, phorc: _..(!g!).1[!![!D __
Addrer: 12499 Wcsr Colfrx Avenue. pO Bor t5l5lxl
Clty, St.te, Ap: Lrkewood. Colorrdo.80215
A.
t.
Summrrv of lnformrtlotr relrrdlns ncw w.ltcwrtcr trertmcnt plrtrt!
Proposcd Location (IrSal Description): SUI l/4,l/4,Scction 4
Township 65 Ranqc: 9l W County: Garlicld
Typc and capacityoftrcatncnt facilityproposed: Majorpmcesscs Usca Sequencing Batch Rcactor(SBil
Hydraulic: 60.(X)0 gaUday Organic: I 16 lbs. BODy'day
PrcscntPE: 0 DcsignPE: 450-500 7oDomestic: r0o %Indusrial
Location ofFacility:
Attach a mrp of the rrea" wtich includcs thc following:(a) S-milc radius: ell sewegc trcarment plmts, lift sotionq and donrstic wttcr supply irtikcs.O) l-milc radius: habitablc buildings, location of public and privetc pouulc watci wirrs, and an approximatcindication of the to,pography... - Mepc rrc includcd in lppcnOx b i'f tiri,,oorr.
Elllucnt disposel: Surface discharge to w.tcrcourrc (n me) Cttorado Rivcr
Subourficc disporel: -land Application: - Evaporation:
Othcr 0ist):
statc wltct quality clessification of recciving watcrcoursc(s): Aq Lifc cold l. Rccrcation la- Watcr Suogly. Aericula[c_
Proposcd Eftluent Limiutions dcvclopcd in conjunction wirh rhc llrrtcr euality Conrot Division:
BODs
-run
ss
-mdl
Fccal Coliform n00 rnt
Total Rcsidual Chlorine _ mg/l Amnronia _ mg/l Other
will a strtc or Fcdcral gnnt4oan be sought to financc any portion of this projcct? No .
Prcecnt zoning of eitc arca? AsriculamURcaidcntiaURurd Dcnsitv (ARRD,I
Zoning within e l-mile radiuc of sitc? -AI. ARRD. cG. oS (scc Zoninq MFo in ApDcndix N)
What ic thc distsncc dor'nstrcam fiom thc di*chargc to thc ncarcct domcstic watcr supply intakc? ? Milcs
Namc of Supply:
Address ofSupply,
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
Water Quality Control Division
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, Colorado 8024Gf $0
5.
6.
rVQCD-3a (Rcvisd2l0l)Prgc I of4
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Whar is thc distrnce downstrcam from thc dischargc !o thc ncrpst olhcr point ofdivcrsion?ll Miles
Name of Uscr: Ciw of Riflc
Addrcss of Uscr: 202 Railrord Avc. PO Box l9OE- Riflc- CO- 81650
Wh* cntity has thc rcsponsibility for opcrating lhc proposcd ficility? The RaPids on thc Colorrdo Homcowncrs -
Association will hire a Ccrtificd oFcrrtor to oDcnrc thc W'WTF whcn it ir coBtmctcd. . ,
rilho owns thc tand upon which the hcility will bc constructcd? Rapids Dcvcloonrcnt CorPoration -
ic.nt to co{rstsuct drc poporcd ficility rt tbb ria)
10.Bstimatcd prcjoct coct 3617-700
lilho is finencially rcsponsiblc for lhc consuuction and opcntior ofthc frcility?Rroi& Dcvclonrnt CorDoElian
I l. Namcs rnd rddrrsscs ofall municipalitiB rnd witer and/or s.nibtion disrricts witbin 5 milca downstrcam of thc proposcd
wstcratcr trcrtsncnt frcility sitc. NONE-
t2.Is the fecility in a l(X)',pr Aood pteia or olhcr nrhral hazerd rrcr? No
lfro, whet prccantions rrc bcing trkcn?
Has tic flood plain bocn dcsignated by thc Colorrdo rilrtr C,onccrvdion Bo.rd' Dcprrtmcnt of Natunl Rcrourpcr or
othoagency? ColoradoWataConscrvationBoal4
(AgacYNurG)
lf ro, what is thet dcsigmtion?
-13. plcasc idcntify rny additionat frcron drar might hclp thc \llatcr Quatity Control Division mrlcc rn informod dccirion on
your application forsitc approvet. Thc Raoids on Orc Colorado is e Dlettcd subdivisior wilh prcvisions for ISDS
_sJElcnrs on cach loL f'hc owner is in thc orocess of rcouiring rn additionsl 64 lcrcs that .dioim thc suMivision
-d is submininc r rcqucst ro ilrc countv to rczonc the cxistins rubdivision to Plroncd Unit Dcvclqpmcnt (PUD).
-Tic!fircnt of rcsidcnti.l wistcnetcr utilizing thc SBR trcstmcnt plmt with ultrrviolcr dfuinfcctiofl r*Duld Dmvi&
r rcFrilr rhcct of FpGs if nccc$ry)
WQCI}3I (Rcvircd 2/01)Prgc 2 ofl
,'
,.
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Ifthe facility will be located on or adjacent to r site that is owned or managed by a federal or state rgency, sendthe agency a copy of this application for the agency's review and recommendatlon.
Recommendation of governmentat ruthorlties:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with thecomprehensive plan and any other plans, policies, and/or regulations for the area, including the 201 Facility ptan or 20gwater Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any drrther coiments or questi'ons, please call(303) 692-3s00.
Date
Recommend
Aporoval
Recommend
Disaoproval Comment
Signature of
Representative
Mrnagcment Agcncy
Town of New Castle (within 3 miles)City or Town (If sitc is insidc boundary)
County
I cerdfy thrt I sm familiar wlth the requlrcments of the sRegulatlons for the Site Appllcation process,, rnd hwe postedthe slte ln lccordence with the regulations, An engineertng repo$ as described by ihe regulauons, has been prep'ared andis enclosed.
Local Hcslth Authoriry
Gene R. Hilton. Pres- RDC
T12ed Namc
Water Quality Management Planning Agency
wQCD-3a (Revised 701)Pagc 3 of4
ATTACHMENT TO SITE APPLICATION
In accordance with C.R.S. 1981, 25-8:702(2Xa), (b), and (c), rnd thc'Rcgulations for thc Sitc Application Ptoccss',
the Water Quality Contol Division must determine that each sitc location is consistcnt with thc long range,
compreheniive planning for the area in which it is to bc locatcd, that Ore plant on the prqoscd sirc will be rnanaged to
minimizc the potential idverse irpssts on watcr qrulity, and must encouagc the consolidation ofwastewater
treatrnent worlcs whencvcr feasiblc.
In making this determination, thc Division requires cach ap,plicant for a sitc approval for a donrcstic wastswilor
treatrnent-works to supply an engineering rtaort describing the project and showing 0re applicant's capabilitics to
manage and operate tii i".ifity or"r tlre lifJof thc projeot to dc&flrinc the potcntial adversc imrpacte onlratcr_$4ity.
fnc 6ort stratl be consid€r,edthe culmination ofthe planning Prcccss and as a minirmrm shall addrees the following:
Scrvice arca definition including cxisting and pmjected population, site locatioq staging or phasing
floyloading projections, and rclationship to othcr watcr and wastesrater tDeatment planb in the arca
proposcd sitc location, evaluation of altomative siEs, and anluation oftrcatnrot altenratirrcg.
Proposcd elllucnt limitations gs d.velopod in cmrdination with thc Division.
Analysis ofcxisting facilitics within thc scrvicG area(s).
Analysis of oppornrnities for consolidation of trcatment works in accordance with the prorisions of
-
22J(lXc), inciuding thosc recommended in the water quality mmagcrneot plan, rmless thc approved
water qualiry management plan rccommends no consolidation.
Evidence fira the pro,posed site and facility opcrations will not be adverscly cffccted by floodplain u
other natural hazards. Wt crc such hazrrds ars idcntified at the sclccted sitc, the rcport shatl describe
mcans of mitigating thc hazard.
Evidence shall be presented in thc form ofa rcpor! containing soils testing resutts and design
recommendations and prepored by a hofcssional Gcologist and a Geotcchnisal Enginecr, or by a . -
professional mceting the qnalifications ofboth hofessional Geologist mdGegtcchnicd Enginccr, with
an appropriatc lcvel of expericnce invcstigating geologic hazards, stating that thc site will 8tryort thc
propoced facility.
Dctailcd dcscription of sclccted altcmativcs incMing lcgal dcscription of thc sitc, tncatnrcnt qntcm
descripion" desigp capacities, and operational staffrng nccdr.
Legal anangemen6 showing conhol of sitc for thc pojcct lifc or sboving-thc ability of thc cnlrty to
""{uir"
tt "iit" and usc it foi the projoct lifc. Approval by the Division of an rpplication for sitc
approval shall not be deenred to * a dctermination that tlre proposod trca.tr_ncnt_worla is or is not
ne@ssary, that the proposed sitc is or is not the bcst or only site upon which-to locatc such I featrncnt
works, oi that location of a rcatmcnt works on the gitc is or is not a rcasonablc public usc jusri$nlg
condemnation of the sitc. Approvat by the Dvision shall only be dcemed to bc a detennination that thc
site ap,plicstion mects the roquircment ofthis regulation 22 (5 CCR' lW2'22).
Instiotional arrangcmenr such as contract and/ or oovcnant tcntu which will bc finalizcd to pay for
accesable waste treafi ls'nl
Management capabilitics for controlling thc wlstcwltcr loodings within the cryacity limitations of thc
propolo tr€at
"nt
wor*s, i.c., us€f conurcts, operating a8r€flE[ts, prctr?tEtc[lt rcquiremcnu lttdor
it "'.-"g.r*t capabilitics to orpand the facilitics as ncedcd (subjcct to the appropriate, future rwisw
and approval procedurcs).
Financial systcrq which has bccn dwclopcd to provirtc for necesgry cfiul p{ continud opcratioq
maintenancc, and replrcernent through thc lifc of the projcct. This would inchrde, for cxanpte,
anticipatcd fee strusture.
Implementatior plsn ild schedulc including cstimrted construction timc and cstimatcd start'Iry &tc.
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF:
A NEW DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAIIT
IVQ@-3I (Rcviscd 2/()1)Pege 4 of{
Exhibit 20
decrr
HEPWORTH . PAWLAK G EOTECHNICAL
March 31, 2003
Rapids Development Corporation
Attn: Gene Hilton
2102 West Arapaho Drive
Littleton, Colorado 80120-3008
Hepwonh. Parvlak Georechnica
5020 Counry Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
emaiL hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
Job No. 103 198
Subject:Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Waste Water Treatment
Site, Lot 1, The Rapids on the Colorado, Counry Road 335, Garfield
County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Hilton:
As requested, Hepworrh-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for
design of foundations at the-subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with
our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Rapids Development
Corporation dated March 5, 2003. The data obtained and our recomrnendations based
on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in
this report. Hepworth - Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted percolation
testing for the subdivision development.and presented our findings in repors dated May
t2,L995 and August 8, 1996, Job No. L952L7.
Proposed Construction: The proposed treatment plant will be a pre-manufacrured
consete structure approximately 80 feet by 80 feet in size located.in the area of the pits
shown on Figure 1. Cut depths are expected to be up to about 15 feet. Foundation
loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of
the proposed type of construction.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this.report.
Site Conditions: The site was mostly vacant at the time of our field exploration. An
existing abandoned building was located to the south-southwest of the exploratory pits.
Minor overlot grading consisting of shallows cus and fills for subdivision development
rvas observed across the lot. The Colorado River'is located about 110 feet to thc north-
northwest and is approximately 10 feet lorver in elevation than the proposed building
site. The ground surface is relatively flat with gentle slope down to the northwest.
Parker 303.841.7119 . Coloradb Springs ?19-633-5567 . Silvenhome 970'468'1989
Rapids Developmenr Corporation
March 31., 2003
PageZ
There is about 2 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building area.
vegetation consists of sparse grass and rveeds with cottonrvood trees.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by .
excavating nvo exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure L. The
logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1Zz
feet of topsoil (possible old fill in Pit 1) consist of loose, srratified silt and sand of
depths of.5% to 6Y= feet where relatively dense slightly silty sandy gravel and cobbles
with boulders to the bottom pits depths of 7 and 6Vz feet. Resuhs of swell-consolidation
testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of sandy silt presented on
Figure 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture condidons and light
loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under consrant load) when wetted. The
sample showed high compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. No free
water was observed in the iits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist
to moist.
The log of a rvell (Rapids Well No. 4) drilled to the east of the proposed building area
as Part of the subdivision development was provided by Mr. Hilton. The subsurface
conditions observed in the pits are similar to those encountered at the well which was
drilled to a final depth of 80 feet. Bedrock of the Wasatch Formarion was encountered
at a depth of 1.8 feet. The free water level was measured at a depth of 12 feet rvhen
drilled in April 1996.
Foundatiou Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings or a mat foundation placed on the undisturbed natural gravel soil or bedrock
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf for supporr of the proposed
treatment plant. We expect settlenrents to be 1 inch or less and essentiaUy occur during
construction. Footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for conrinuous walls
and2 feet for isolated pads. The topsoil, existing fill and loose and disturbed soils
encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed
and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed gravel soils or bedrock.
Voids created by the removal of large rocks should be backfilled with compacted sand
and gravel or with concrete. Exterior footings, footings beneath unheated areas and
edges of muts should be provided with adequarc cover above rheir bearing elevations for
frost protection. Placemenr of foundations at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is
-2
Job # 103 198
c&&ecrr
Rapids Development Corporation
March 31,2003
Page3 -3-
rypically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and
bottom to sptn local anomalies such as by assuming an unsuPPorted length of at least
10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a
lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of 'at least 50 pcf for
granular backfill such as the on-site sandy gravel. The unit weight given above assumes
a dry bacldill condition. The submerged portion of the foundation should consider
hydrostatic pressure in addition to the lateral earth loading.
Surface Drainage: The follorving drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the treatment plant has been completed:
1) Inundution of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided d uring construction.
Z) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95Vo of, the maxirnum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90Vo of. the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall bacKill should be
capped with about 2f.eet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce
surface water infiltration. .
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
' areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in Pavemenl
and rvalkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance rvith generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in
this report are based upon the.data obtained from the exploratory pis excavated at the
locations indicated on Figure L and to the depths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type
of corisrruction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and
extrapolarion of tbe subsurface conditions identified at the exPloratory pits and
variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is
performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those
Job # 103 198 c5Stecrr
Rapids Developmenr Corporation
March 31, 2003
Page4 -4-
described in this rePort, we should be nodfied at once so re-evaluarion of the
recornmendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not resPonsible for technical interpretadons by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strala and testing of structural fill by a represenrative of the geotechnical.
engineer.
If you have any questions'or if we may be of further assistance, please let us knorv.
Respectfully S ubmitted,
HEPWORTH . PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
I
---,r€ k^AI
Trevor L. Knell
Revierved by:
Jordy Z. Ad
TLI?}srv
attachments igure L -Pits
Figure 2 -ts
tion Test Results
Schrnueser Gordon Meyer - Attn: Bob penningron
ffie.l.ff.g{.s
29707 5ol'/- !,
Job # 103 198
c&Btecrr
\
LOT
3/
/
/
/\..-.J\
/\
/
,/ \ ,-cV}
RAPIDS
VIEW ROAD
BUILDING
EN\ELOPE STAKESIv .-e'
\./^.t\\'r. \ PRoPERTY\ \ zUNE't....Y
'-a\
_....
\
LOT \1\
\_ ./\ .--.^. --/
BUILDING
EN\ELOPE
II
---__s__
, ,r!'ub* ,_ /i:ri.'-/
v?,il*:}
/ -.. -\ -gutt'otNc
/ --\-'/ /
IL,L
[ ,l ,l \ -,.00-
,'I
..-. -l\'I /\
TE - I L --\----'r-L*t-----{PPROXMA
SCAI.E
1'=80'
l
t
I
I
I
I
I
LOT
33I
I
)i
I
I
I
I
l
l
I
\sslo_
\ \couNTY RoAD 33s
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITSHEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.| 103 1s8
I
I
otu
.l.l.
I
E
CLtuo
(,ou-
I
CLoo
PIT 1 PIT 2
t{c37.9
DO-9O
TOPSOllj silt ond sond, scottered cobbles in PIt
Possible old ,ill ln Plt 1.
1, orgonics, moist. dork brown.
SAND (SM): sllghUy silty to silty. looss slighUy moist. light brovrn.
slLT AND sAl'lD (ML-SM); slighuy cloyey, loose. stighily moist. light brown
GRA\ELS, COBBLES AND BOULDERS. (GP-GM);. sondy, stighfly sitty, dense, stighuy moist,light brown, subrounded to rounded river rock. ' ,
2' Diometer hond driven liner somple.F
NOTES:
LEGEND:
a
W
w
ffi
1. Explorotory pits were excovoted on Morch 24, zoos with o bockhoe.
2- Locstions.of explorotory pits wero meosured opproximotety by pocing from feqtures shown on the sitoplon provided.
5- Bevotlons of explorotory pits were not meosured ond logs of explorotory pits ore drown to depth.
4. tt exptorotory pit locottons should be considered occurote onty to the degree implied by the methodused. -'-- ---'
5. The lhes between moteriots shown on the. exptorotory pit logs represent the opproximote boundoriesbetwecn moteriol tlgcs ond tronsitlons moy bo lroduol.-
6. No fee wster wos cncountercd ln the pits of the ttme of excovoting. Fluctuotions in woter tevet moyoccur with tlme.
7. Loborotory Tesitng Resutts:
WC=WoterContenl(%)
DD - Dry Oenstty ( pcf )
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS103 198
Moisture Content = 7.9 percent
Dry Density - 90 Pcf
Somple of Sondy Silt
Frorn: Lot 1. Pit 1 ot 5 1/2 Feel
0
1
,Z
3
N4
cooog5o
Eo()
o
7
'/.g.
10
APPUED PRESSURE - ksf
103 198 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3
FINANC ANd MANAGE ERTIFICA
As evidenced by the signature belor, Rapids Development Corporation, hereby acknodedges and
;;;fr;ih;it# corpoiation is financially and managerially_-qualified to construd and oPerate the
ilipl$5u'*iri;""6itrg"tment facitity to-be tocated in tne swlr4 of Sec'tion 4, Torvnship 6 south,
i{ange 91 West of the 6h P.M., near New Castle, Golorado'
Financial:
rcrn raiian wirt cnma fto lees and loans fiom sharehotders.Funds to finanoe construction will come from cash on hand, tiap I
Management:
Rapids Devetopment Corporation will be responsible for subcontraciling tne q9lpqnq...ry
conitruaion of'the tacirry. Upon completion bf construction and certification that the facility is
;p";;G trop"rty, Rapidi Devfbpment'Corporation.and The Rapids on tle Colorado Homeorners
pEso"i"tiloi, witt iri,iiiate'the formation of a spebial districl to operate the existing Rapids water systems
and the wasterrater treatment facility.
Operation:
'WE; construction is completed, a certified operator will be contraded to operate and maintain the
wasterrater treatment faciti$es.' The operdtor will report directly to the president of Rapids
6ir.fopm"nt Corporation until the special districl is formed and in operation.
Rapids on the Colorado Homeowners Assn.Rapids DeveloPment CorPoration
Sr^rTE RADO
DnpaRrpmNT or
Srarrc
CBnTIFICATE
I, DONETTADAVIDSON, secretary of state of the srate of colorado,
hereby certiff that, according to the records of this ofEce,
RAPIDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
(CoIoTadoCORPORATION )
File# 19nnl823l0
was filed in this of,fice on July 25,19n and has complied with the applicable provisions
of the laws of the State of Colorado and on this date is in good raoairg and authorized and
competent to Eansact business or to conduct its affairs within this state-
Dated: December 5,2003
ForValldailon:
Sra,.TE
DnpANtMENT OF
SrarB
CBNTIFICATE
I, DONETTA DAVIDSON, Secnetary of State of the State of Colorado,
hereby certify that, acco,rding to the records of this offrce'
RAprDs oN TI{E COLORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCLATION (nrE)
(Colorado NOMROFIT CORPORATION)
File # 19971W5478
was filed in this office on June 16,lgn and has complied with the applicable provisions
of the laws of the State of Colorado and on this date is in good standing and authorized and
competent to tmnsact business or to conduct its affairs within this state-
Dued: December 5,2003
FqValldailon:
ZONING IN RMATTON(rocAL@
GARFIELD COT]NTY
ZONING RESOLUTION
oF 1978
BOARD OF COI]NTY COMIIISSIONERS
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
P.O. BOX 640
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
Adopted & Enacted
January 2,1979
Effective
January 2,1979
THIS COPY INCLTIDES ALL AMENDMENTS TIIROUGH:
MARCH,2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Offrcials ofthe County ............ i
Supplementation ................ lt
Resolution No. 79-l
GENERAL PROVISIONS .............
lll
1.00
0l
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
3.00
0l
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
t0ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
4.00
0l
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
l0ll
t2
t4
Purpose
{,utho4!y...
Short Tiile.
Establishment of Disfiicts
Incorporation of Maps ....
ZoneDistrict Boundarries
4pplicati_on of Regulations ..................
Klght to f ann..........
Legend of Zone District Designations.
2.00
0l
02
DEFINITIONS.
Rules of Constuction
Terms Defined
ZONE DISTRICT REGI.'LATIONS.........
{sricultura!&dq'.t'iu!.:.:......:.::......................Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density .
RdsidentiaUlimited/rslburban Density...::.............
BesidentiaUGeneriyuiuan Gnsitl,...L......:::::::::.::::.:::.:.:.:.:::.:::::.:::::::::::::.::.:::::Commercial/Limited.... ..........;........
CommerciaUGeneral ....
ppen/Space ...r..............
Kesource/Lanos.............................
Resjdential-MobileHome/GeneraWrbanDensity.....:::::::::::::::...
flA-rubllc Amrort..
Ufiiing w'aSIb.iiiffiiliibyti:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'
uommerctar Lrnntclng Water Constraint (CDWC)...
Definitions
Purposes ano ou.;eCii;liJ;fD;;6;ffi:::..::::::.::.::::..::.:::.:::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::
lcoP9' : " " " "" ".": "':..'....
Ketauonsnlp ro zomng and_ subdivision ..........
rnrernat .uomPauDrtrty ot PUD
stanoaros and Kequlrements.........
ru Lr.rrocess{lg : :.......
PPYetopment msrages
Maintenance of Common Open Space
Enforcement and Modification of Provisions
oJthp PIan...........
Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelines......:..:..::.::................
3.01.02
3.01.03
3.01.04
3.0r.05
3.01.06
3.01.07
3.01.08
3.02
3.02.01
Kennel, riding stable and veterinary clinic, guiding and outfitting;
il?.-lt;[H:'.y([:;3:itff#$imarv
acoessory uses onlv where it is accessorv to the uses
f,".Tti?#,i#1113fi,H"i;t??J:$ff"t#0"":?Jt:X""ffi il#o'Itr?iB3:ilf ;Hilt'ifl B
standards in Section'5.03.02 -
Uses. conditional: Aircraft landing strip, airport-utility, salvage yard and sanitary landfill;
groupSomtroffie elderly. (A. 97-60)
Home occupation, storage. (A. 8Gl 80;86'09)
ffi ,,?#iiff :.HI&,Hl'#$iifi ffsl.ff m*ffg*LslH'[il.effi bTi
for fabrication of soods from processed natural r€sogrceq; material-landling,
ing facilities, electridal disnilrutirin" warehouse facilitie.s/staging areas, qbT_c^?!t9l
Plant for fabrication of .go9$ tgq. pto."tsed natural
pumpmg laclllues, eleg[noal OlSII'fOUtlOfL warEltuuss laLluij.svltrErrrE d.rc, roer.re.o'rvu
ipeas. stbraee areas. water impoundments, assess routes, utility lines, ufility substatlons'
pipelines; eltractiori, proqessiirg; public gatheringslcoqgnepiaf qgklryq.r:ltlgPl.s.UlP,rtareas, storage areas, wa
pipelines ; extraction, Pn
Ialilities; guest houses;
253:86-09:
ilitv lines, utility subsations,
cia! prk;leqpitio-nat- s1pggrt,arlc recreatlonal suDDort
(A. 80-l 80; 8l-145;'81-
-gi:niiggnz5) Mass Transit Facility (added 2oo2-12')
Accessory dwellins unit meeting ttre sandards in Section 5.03.02 for any lot not clcated
after a public heari-ng or meeting tfter7l9i.
Minimum Lot Area: Two (2) acres. (A. 80- I 80); excep as otherwise approved in a Cluster
6pffi.?0.0-3-TD-
Maximum Residential Lot Coveraee: Fifteen perc€nt (l5o/o). (A. 80-180)
Minimum Setback: (Unless otherwise permitted by special use permit.)
(l) Front vard: (a) arterial streets: seventy-five (75) feet fror4 ceqterline or fiffy(Sg) fect
tnSm lot line. whiihever is sreater; (b) locil streets: fifty (50) feet from street centefllne or
twenty-five (2, feet fromftont lot line, whichever is greater;
(2) Rear yard: Twenty-fivc (25) feet from rear lot line;
(3) Side vard: Ten (10) feet from side lot linc, or one-half(ll2) the building heighg
if,ichevef is greater. (A. 8o-l 80)
ffi
Forty (40) fect. (unlcss othenuise permitted by special usc
Additional Requirenoeu[s: All uses shall bc subject to the provisions of Section
@ons).(A.80'180)
A/R/RD -. AGRICULTI.'RAL/RESIDENTIAI-/RI.'RAL DENSITY
ffi #*#*htrisl'ffi ,l&:l,iflPrHffi ,'f 5f, :Hi,qffi#fJ:?3HEry"ief Llfi"fi:t
cusromary aocessory u5;a fiiuAinc E:ulioiriisfoishelter or eiclosure ofprso.ns, qnimals
oi-;6neril emoloied in any of the abovCuses, retail establishment for sale of goo<ls
prcfuesieahom'raw material-s produced on the lot;
Guiding and outfitting and Park;
3.02.02
3.02.03
3.02.04
3.02.05
3.02.06
3.02.07
3.02.08
3.03
3.03.0r
Single-family dwelling and customary accessory uses. (A. g6-09)
Accessgry dwelling unit approved ps a part ofa public hearing or meetins on a subdivision
Uit"":i:'i,l"S":t:XBl,fi.fi.rr.rthouse special use approve<l after 7/e5and meeting the
Hif"rmlil*tt'fit",?ri'3,ttl?i ?X.titl6t' communitv buudings' dav nursery and
pffr$,lf'ffffAtl:ddidi_'ffi for conduct of arts and crafts, home occupation, water
Ufes. fePci?l: Airport utiligr, feedlot as principal use ofthe lot, crematorium. aericultur€-relarco Duslness. resolts, lcennel, riding stable, and veterinary clinic, sh6oting rangefacility(A.98-108);
Tw.o-family dwelling, g.qfpelparlq ski lift ang.trails; broadcasting studio, communication
iTlTff fiHi+#:trj#,:iff *il,jffi sffi Htr?,r1srhfi?il:iilffi #iff dnr&
Public gatherings;.storage of oil and gas dritling equipment; Site for extraction processins.$oragg or.matenal-ha-ndling of natural r,esounces; utility lines, utilitv -s'ubstationli
ii:t?i',"ti:i}lffiil"i"flffi6ts_i6tifl?Hilftl,;',',80-64;80-r80;80-3r3,8r-r4s:
ffi:Tfl,?y,i:'i*fl;tlfitri'18$:,:%iys in section 5'03'02 ror anv rot not created
Kennel
Minimum Lot Area: Two (2) acres; except as otherwise approved in a ctuster option(zoori7)--
Maximum Lot Coveraee: Fifteen percent (lS%).
Minimum Setback:
(l) {ront y-ard: (a) arterial-streets: seventy-five (75) feet from street centerline or fiftv (50)
::f,"Tf; XlTl*:T,iiii"il,sTil:i'i:f,'?tit,"a,l'*:l,tTtrJ"f P#LPrrom'stiee(
(2) Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet from rear lot line;
[i],!i9: tg9:fe3l1!) feet from side rot rine, or one-hatf(rD) the height ofthe principarDurlotng, wnrchever ls greater.
\4?Tl gr[h, Ee i eh!-o f B [i tdin U Twenty- fi ve (25 ) tu.
reAIIusesshalIbesubjecttotheprovisionsunderSection5(uupprementary Keguhtrons).
R/L/SD .. RESIDENTIAI-/LIMITED/SUBI'RBAN DENSITY
Pseq. b#ieht: Single-family.dw-elling and customary accessory uses, includine buildinssror snelter or enclosure ot animals or property accessory to usebfthe lot for sin-ele-famiTvresidential purposes and fences, hedles, gaidens, walls and simitarlanai;iETdd'J;parK.
ffiffi"#-Sli5Slilitytsfl?oiuilding, dav nurserv and schoor, home occupation,3.03.02
3.03.03
3.03.04
3.03.05
3.03.06
3.03.07
3.03.08
3.03.09
3.04
3.04.01
3.04.02
3.04.03
3.04.04
3.04.05
3.04.06
Uses. soecial: Two-family dwelling, row house, studio for conduct of afis and graq, Y.aJer
mh'$liX.'iTllilt\%eii'r?:t'ryr4tt'rB:Hsicommunrcatronlacr,tv'
Accessory dwelline unit meeting the standards in Section 5.03.021 for any lot not created
after a public hearing or meeting after 7/95.
Mass Transit Facility (added 2002'12)
Minimum Lot Arpa: Twenry thousand (20p00) square feet and as further provided rmder
SpFIemA@-R-egulationi.
Maximum Lot Coverase: Twenty'five percent (25o/o).
Minimum Setback:
f :IHH'#*,{"e,fr lTg,f, fl rs:nEg;,tli(g):l"H*Tffi ;?3b","ffi "f, iP'fg
centertine or twenty-five (25) feet from front lot line, whichever is greater;
(2) Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet from rear lot line;
(3) Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side lot line or one-half (l/2) the height ofthe principal
Ddilaing,'wtrichevei is greater.
Morimum height of Buildings: Twenty-five (25) fe€L
ffi
o.l0o/l.o and as furorer provided under supplementary
All uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section 5
R/LA,ID - RESIDENTIAL/LIMITEDA'RBAN DENSITY
Uses. bv rieht: Sinele-familv dwelling and customary accessory qsps;-including buildings
6r sfielfar;r-encloiure of animals or property accesso[y to use of the lot tor smgle-nmlly
residential purposes and fences, hedges, gardens, walls an<l slmrlar landsc,ape reanlresl
park.
llses^ conditional: Church. community building, day nursery and school; row house; home
o-iiifeiilon; grcup home for the elderly (A97-60)
Uses. soecial: Two-familv dwelling, studio for condust oJ -qts and crafts,- w.ater
Ffffi6-t$lgr'mtig$yrti**ions' communication facilitv' conections racilitv'
Ii[asJ rransit-FaCil i* (adiied .2002:12)
Minimum Lot Area: Seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet and as further
;rofiileifundEiffilementary Regulations.
Maximum Lot Co'idraee: Thirty'fie peroent (35o/o).
Minimum Setback:
(r)rronTardi,g),ffi i,tlL:x,trfi:;lri,ry;[T,lflfJ,f&,*ffi r,ff ?!Tj,fl&"[.xP'fg
centerline or twenty-fivc (25) feet from front lot line, whlcnever 15 grearcr;
(2) Rearyard: Tworty-five (25) fu from rear lot line;
3.06.02
3.04.07
3.04.08
3.04.09
3.05
3.05.01
3.0s.02
3.05.03
3.05.04
3.0s.05
3.05.06
3.05.07
3.05.08
3.05.09
3.06
3.06.01
(3) Sidg.y|rd:Ten(10)feetfromsidelotlineorone-half(l/2)theheightoftheprincipal
building, whichever is greater.
Maximum Height of Buildingq: Twenty-five (25) feet.
ffi 0.25/l.o and as fu+her provided under Supprementary
uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section 5
ffi 0.2511._0 and as $rther provided under Supplementary
R/G/SD -. RESIDENTIAL/GENERAL/SUBURBAN DENSITY
ffi ,HHe;T$is,$ffi lli:,"i,!ffi ,T#rffJ,il:a:.:ff :6Si:60)
ffiffii',illli,,lJ.gEs#;"ti3liii#f; &:?Pi1li;i,l,i?-dr$i*tllg,1BB'f ,"*,
Mass Transit Facility (doaealobz:irt ---"'
ffi thousand (20,000) square feet and as further provided under
Maximum Lot Coverase: Thirty-five peroent (35%).
Minimum Setback:
S,##,'#ll*i$rla$i};*irHn','',fl{i*H:ffi drFffi ",#,s}
(2) Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet fiom rear lot line;
"pJ,3ffirfr!;il"Jtf iSLHl*:rn side lot tine orone-hatf(l/2)the height ofthe principat
Maximum Heieht of Buildines: Twenty-five (25) fi,€t.
ffint,] *"r shall be subject to the provisions under section 5
R/GruD -. RESIDENTIAL/GENERALruRBAN DENSITY
ffipgeffiffiffi!{'f$#.r*ffi {#*r#:,**trffi
Vses.,conditiona!; Row housq; studio for conduct of arts and crafls: home occunation:cnurcn. communfiv building, day nursery and school, group home forihe elderli. ( .ti:60) e' --J ------
Additional Requirements: Allsnp@).
3.06.03
3.06.04
3.06.05
3.06.06
3.06.07
3.06.08
3.06.09
3.07
3.07.01
Uses. soecial: Mobile home park; restaurant or retail establishment accessory to principal
usffiE'fg1 formultiple-fainilyiesidential purposes; communication facility, correction
faciliw. (A.97-60)
Mass Trinsit Facility (added 2002'12)
Water impoundments, utility lines utility substations. (A. 8l-145; 86-09; 99-025)
Minimum Lot Area: Seven thousand five hundred (7,500) sguare feet and as further
ptovji 6SuFFementaryRegulations.
Maximum Lot Coveraee: Fifty percent (50olo).
Minimum Setback:
[:IT8H',trg,La,iil"{*,f; fl rs:iT'SHgig,'t"iH.mlffi:?3b","i#"d*f, t$g
centerline or twenty-five (25) feet from lot line;
(2) Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet from rear lot line;
(3) Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side lot line or one-half (l/2) the height ofthe principal
bdilding,'whichevei is
-greatcr.
Maximum Heieht of Buildines: Twenty-five (25) fe*.
ffi
0.50/1.0 and as furttrer provided under Supplementary
Additional Requireme4ts: All uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section 5
@s).
C/L .. COMMERCIAL/LIMITED
Uses. bv rieht: Sinele-familv, nuo-family and multiple'faqrily dwelling, and crstomary
;itdiloiv ii6es incl[dine building for shelter or enclosure of animals or proPgrty acoesso.ry
toG; oltfiot foi residential fr'urposes and fences, he-dgeq, garde.n9, walls and similar
landscape featurcs; park; boarding and rooming house; hotel, moteL looge;
Church. community building, day nursery and schogrJ; auditoriunr" public building for
adminiitratioru frafemal lod[6, ai gallery, museum' library;
Hospital, clinic, nuning or convalescents home; group home for the elderly. (A. 97-60)
Office for conduct of business or plofession, studio for conduct of arts and crafts, providcd
all activity is conducted within abuilding;
Commercial establishments, as listed below, provided the following requirements are
observed;
(l) All fabrication, service and repair operations are conducted within a building;
(2) All storage of materials shall be within a building or obscured by a fence;
(3) All loading and unloading of vehicles is conducted on private prop€rty;
(a) No dust, noise, glares or vibration is projected bcyond the lot;
Wholesale and retail establishment including sale of food, beverages-, dry goo{sr.fumiture,
appliances, automotive and vehicular equipment, hardware, clothlng, moilrc nomes'
Section 4.00
Planned Unit Developments
Exhibit 29
Density
Housing
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
Definitions
4.01.01 Common Open Space
4.01.02 Plan
4.01.03 Planned Unit DeveloDment
1.gl.gt Commencement of Divelopment
4.01.05 Contiguous
Purposes and Objectives of Development
Scope
4.01.06 Densiw
\.0_1.97_ Fractiirnal Ownership Interest4.01.08 Ownership
4.06
4.07
Consistency With the Master/Comprehansive plan
Relationship to Zoning and Subdivision
4.05.01 Applicabilitv to pUDs
4.05.02 Wajver or niodification of specification
Internal Compatibility of Planned Unit Developments
Standards and Requirernents
4.07.01 Approval of PUD rezonins
4.07.02 OEsfeet parkine soaces -
4.07.03 Site plan criterii" -r----
4.07.04 Ma,rimum heisht of buildinss4.07.05 Lot areas and Setback restriiiions4.97.96 Residential densrty
4.07.07 Minimum aoTease
4.07.08 Uses permitted -
4.07.09 Common oD€n sDace
4.07.10 Time-strare/fracrional
4.07.11 Findings ofthe PUD Development Regulations Section4.07.12 Pumos;
4.07.13 Cederat
4.07.14 Definistions
4.07.15 Requirenrents
407.15.01 Foi Lands Desienated Hish Densiw Residential4.07.15.02 For Lands Wittr anf Land Use Designatio, ottrer Than HighResidential
4.07.15.03 comoutation of Required Affordable Housing units and Mx ofUnits
4.07.15.04 PUD Amendment Requests subject To These Regulations
PUD Processing
4.98.01 Review of applications 4.0g.05 Applicr
]'BS.B3 trH#*#process i:33:33 0X3IH";;;XTJffi*.
4.08.04 Use aira occupancy restrictions
Development in Stages
4.09.01 Time limits
4.09.02 Late application
4.09.03 Failuriio proceed to a subsequent stage
4.08
4.09
4.10
4.1I
4.t2
4.09.04 Nonresidential uses
4.09.05 Developme,nt & Constnrction
Maintenance of Common OPen SPace
Fee
Enforccment and Modification of Provisions ofthe Plan
4.12.01 Common Open Space
4.12.02 Enforcerneni of riovisions
4.12.03 Modifications of provisions
4.12.04 Relnoval ofrighs to eirforce,i.ii:oj malpenOenfo?Outsiae Legal and/or Technical Expertise
Garfield County Affsdable Housing Guidelines4.t4
4.14.01
4.14.02
4.14.03
4.t4.04
4.r4.05
4.14.06
4.14.07
4.14.08
4-14.09 Roommdcs
+.i,i.tO SBeciat Review fs 4 to 6 Bedromr Unis
4.14.11 Gievance Procedures
Rentine. Pgrchasine" or Selling Afforrdable Housing UnitsQtralifications to Reirt c to
Purch#e AtrordabFC HorsingU^ Iis , . , ,! rr_:^drtifirilori to-ncsiae in d etrordaUle HousingUnit
fron" toOualifr for Affordable HousingUnit (Rgntal o-r**.x"S*y,***,1*H}"Ti*hYli,'.Sill*o",["Tiffile9ousineunit*oceaurii for'tnitiat Purchase and fo'r rlou$ng
Execution of Deed Resrictions by ApplicantsIfi;d;for pe"sonJ Disirihg to"puichase m Atrord-able Housing Unit
Mr*fium Vacanw of an Affordable Housing Unit for Re'nt
LJave of Absenccfor Orvners ofan Affordable Housing Unit
4.00
4.01
4.01.01
4.01.02
4.01.03
PLANNED I.JNIT DEVELOPMENTS
DEEINITION
As used in this Planned Unit Development Section (hereafter "section") the followingdefinitions shall apply, unless the contei<t othenvisiiiqiiii;al'-.
fl tri*"i:ffi.Ti."-ffi lmffi::Hlffi ili\TmHuse or entorrrnelrt of residents, occupanls add owners.d'f $€ plsnned Unfi ffii6ii,i"rt.Categonie-s of open space are alfin;a'; iott,olrs'
"-'-- *
tlr*}ffi H,l,H*T.ffi ruT,ffi"T*ffi a'erasesropeor
(2) Bp-creatioPl open spage: .Any opgn space lapf, to be developed into an area or areasror orqanrzeo or unorga+-lzed recreahonal activities, examples would include, but are notlimiteil to: soccer/footf, ali pi4 iC fiiar, p.rrr, -riiiEr;iv;h6;liliil";il, iliffii# iro;
$lrffi .tP',,fxffi :tffi "H*,!:$*;,Hmtmfr:ii8ilimited to: golf co*rses, wat€r ski lakes, hor& riding acilitieq 5i ri-ii., G;;w' usr
('$) I"imi=ted Es=s.gpgg sPgcg, Any land to beretained as opelr space that has an averqge slopegeater thu, 25Yo. (A. 97- 109)
Hgq}r-qr."-"r:lg-9_a:y.lopm:nt of a pranned Unit Deveroprnent which may includqano neeo not De Emrted to easefitents, covenanls and restrictions rblating to usq lo6ation an<i*llg$t$ff;^lj other snuctur6.s, intqnsity oruse oi aeniit;fi8"jfiffi; ffiift;;
Itiflifl fi filii'q'ff ffi ifiy$f,l1:ii*TtriHn,mr,{r*tr"Hf }:?##*ffireferred tri in mis defirxition. <4. gzmgt -
!!qp!d. U.nit Deyelopqrenf (hereinafter a PUD): Shdl mean a sincle parcel of land orcorlFg.umls ParS .9r ldrd of a size suffieient-to accomnnodarc an iriteeraflv ptanned
e,lrvrro4qrcqt, conhou$ty a singlc lamdovmer, or ty a groupofiadowncrsr 6fi'd"i;lop{
9sg u^nifi,ed plan for the nLmbertf dycl[rg uirits, 6offierli+ A;;ffi;A'*ii#ti i"il&
PoJPaI uses, or any combrnahon ol-the tbregotng. The Plan for which doei not corresoond
#Sf;h:Y*T.Em:r"i,:x$nrYart&t l?1tr?-ffi wu'" or ottrer iist icri on ;5 th;
Any.reference to a PUD shall be assumed to include reference to a TpUD as well, whereapplicable, w.hether or not *TPLID"is uniten-
Transit Area Planned Unit Dwelopment: (hereinafter a TPUD) Shall mean a single parcel
oftand or contiguousparcels ofland meeting the above definition ofa "plannedijnit
Developrnelrt" and which also is located within 2000 feet of a planned or developed mass
tramsit terminal or.station which has been approved pursuant to $ 5.1 I of these regulations.lf any portion of a property or parcel contained within a PUD is within ZOOO f."tif "plaaned or developed nuss transit station or terminal the entire proper-ty, parcel or pUD
shallbe tleemed to be included within a TpUD.
A "planned" mass tansitterminal on station, is herein defined as a facility identified in a
bonafide and endorsed conceptual planning process by an agency or auttrtritywith legal
standing to undertake alternatives analysis and conceptual design, and where:tlrat Aciity
has progressed to the prefemed or selected alternative for preliminary design, and where it
4.01.04
4.01.0s
4.01.06
4.01.07
4.01.08
4.02
4.03
4.04
can be reasonably assumed that such facility will be built within 20 years. The 2000 foot
radius, where the facility is not yet in place or desiged, shall be deemed to be from the
center point of a probable location. Where there may be.several probable locations in a
given are4 the Applicant may show such alternatives and accommodate those in the
conceptual design and Skach Plan of a TPLID in consultation with the board and to assist
in review by a Mass Transit Agency. (added 2002-12)
Commencement of Dwelooment: Approval of a Final Plat and commencement of
A@visiori Improvernents Agreernent. (A. 97- 1 09)
Contisuous: Whe,n applied to parcels of lan4 shall mean the lands have a oonrnon border
;rffiffiE=;acn other^on at leeist one commoi propertyboundary, fo,r a minimum of thirty
fggt-d;. F;;-tfD,5D.ses oftnis definition,'a public right-of,way or easement ^shall bb
iodsidered a comrdonbropetty boundary for properties separated only by right-o$w-ay or
mn'ihll;]?,f rE*fl;,H"'ffi,"ffijTH*,lHyP.ffi itffi ,iffi'T#"?
terrrina or station must be within2000 feel. (addcd 2002-12)
Demsiw: The overall averase residential density shall be calculated by summing tte number
Fffi'entiaO*iUinsunitiplannedwithintheboundryofthe PUDdnddividtuigbytlrctotal
gloss area Cxpressedin acris, within the boundary of the PUD. (A. 97-109)
Fractional Ovmership Intcrcs! Any type o{shaed-ownership or leaseback of a structure
iiffi al ociqiaincv that results in ocorlancy shres being allotted fo
a designated period of time. (A. 97-109)
Ownershio: Dernonstration of ownership shall be constituted by current written-pnoofofwho
6, tiw Uoias title to all of the fandG) deprcted on nl, p[at or plan filedrvith &e
ail"h^ *-itn'Ur?mi"i-umproof of ownen*rip cimsisting of a dtle report issued by- a-title
""-"ili" ar-tt orizea to conduct business in thi State of Colorado. Thi title r€po{t stdl be
Issrda"',,tmoiJttrannhe€niiSla"vrpriortothedateofzubmittalofthePUDapplicaiqr. lf
i[imA-ii-o*rea Uv a corp,oratiori oi similar legal entity, that designates-an individtral or
"itit t .ct i" the eomotitior's or similr legaT eirtity behalt, a prbof of agqtcy sball be
;;riirJ a"a-CoSsiofaCo,rporate Resolutio[ or similar legal document, designating the
ilAi"idualor entit to act as'agent _Ih-e .pplryution must 5e signed by m otrgr of the
S:*m*l,Sfe18g-it$;*u* bv fli" Secretary orthe c6rporatioo' or officer ora
PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT
The oumose of a PUD is to D€rmit geat€r design flexibility and" consequently, morclreativc
ffi imsisiri:irffi 3:i:,ilnggr,n#y,t'i'J'|''HH:ffiTf"113,ffi ls
*"fo*riw.-bottl fi iuUJtarce and locatioru with fre goals ard objectives bf thc
oiiJto/cof,prrl"irsi"e pim troogh integrated dwelopment.-(A. 97-109) The purpose of a
TPUD is mbre tully sef out in $5.11. (adiled 2W2'12)
SCOPE
Applications for Planned Unit Devetop,ment zoning may be made for lurd located in my
zonrng dlstnct.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE TVIASTER/COMPREHENSIVE PTAN
No pUD or TPUD shall b€ approved unless it is found by the Cornrty Cqqmissioners to be in
sen€ral confonniw wittr the CounVs Mastcr/Comprehensive plan(s). When appropriatg an
E iiiic"tioo foiillan6Gentto the Garfield County MaserTComfrehensivC Plan may be
tid;;-;rrr of a-FUO application. Any applicrition for Masfer/Comprehensive Plan
ame,ndmeirt muS be approv-eil by the Planning Commissioq prior to rts recoffir€ndafion on
4.05
4.05.01
4.0s.02
4.06
HilH,ffii':ff ",i,.ilu,#?;rf"T,'tq*dfl ETrffi ,ff fl :f iix: j:I,."T"$?*:"t:
establishinelanduse {gqignationi contained in the Master/Compreheniir"f,tan t,t S7:16i(added zod2-tz;TPUD)"
RELATIONSHIP TO ZONING AND SUBDIVISION
The Garfield Count-v.Subdivi^sion Regulations,_ a.s &e same may be from time to timeamendd aqd.$g pr6visions -ofthis.Zo4ing Ri;Aution, usEi-iuiiii'*uv G d:o* ti-e io [*"amended, sh{l b.e. applicable to PUDs insofar as siid negutationi *d dsoiliiil-*.consrstent wrtJr thrs seclion and.with any specific_zoning-or subdivision requirernentsapprovedbythe County_Commissioners attheiime ofzoning-orptattingthePUD-ii-q-uifron.
To the extent that said Regulations- md Resolution re incorEistdnt her;nift, tt &EiUiG U"
1ry,1i:at"h1i!:l*lxi:"t'""itm*"irmt-#)*'"'o""ttorpuDi'iuiffi Jo-trv
It is recogniz:d that-the uniqueness ofeachproposal for a PUD and TPUD requires that the
lpjcrlq+o,ns, standards andrequiremqts for v.ggrgus facilities, including but iot limited to,
l!:,I_d{lg l9r!mg; steets, tdehwavp, alfeys, uFlities, curbs, gutters, side-walkq street lights,pafl(s, ptay-grouncls, school groundg sorm drainage, wat€,r supply and distribution.-and
t_"Iqq9folt_"chon and treatn€n!..may. F :ubj"flJq modificatioi fiom the_specifications,
standards, and requtrements established in the Subdivision Regulations ofGrfirild Countv foiIike uses in other zone districts. The County Commissioners-rnay, at ttre time ofronine'a" uPUQ -+d TPUD, waiv-q or modify the sp6cifications, stu,aardd ;a-;"qri;;;i;" ;ff"hwould be otherunse app-licable, as requested by the applicant. Any waiver or modification ofspeqrcahons, slandards-and requiranentq yill only be approveil if it can be demonstratedtnat me proposed waryg.(s) 1s consrstent_wit!]lgs! engineering practices,' as recommended
by an engrneer retained by the County. (A. 97-109) (amended-2002-12)'
INTERNAL COMPATIBILITY OF PLANNED UNM DEVELOPMENTS
4.07
4.07.01
4.07.02
4.07.03
It is recoenized that certain individual land uses, regardless of their adherence to all the
liJrieriili*riG pro"iU"d for in this sectiort, miglrt not exist -corlrpatiblywith^one atotlter.
Ther'efore, a proircsed PUD or TPUD shall be considered Aom the u)rnt ot'vlew ot'the
r;Uiiffihilina'ro",iitiuit6; ;itt; i"auiauat etements of the Plin' and no PUD.o.r
fpUD-in-it UJ ippioved ritrictr conlqrns incompatible elernents internally or with
neighboring propeity. (amended 2002-12)
STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS
The County Commissioners may approve a pro-pos€d PUD-rezoning upon a finding that it
will imolement the DurDoses ofthis section and wrll meet the stanGnds ano requuEm€,llts
sei fHti in ttis stcdon. A TPUD must also mcet the additional standards and
iii"ii*i"nir i* fortn-in tt e supple,mentuyregulations foundin $5.1t ofthisresolution.
(arhended 2002-12)
The number of off-street parkins spaces for each use in each PUD shall not be le,ss than
til;;ArE#*tJ i;iiit[J"sd -in othq zoning -distrigt$ gxqgpt tr* qrg County
Commissioners may increase or decrcase the required number of ofi:street Pskutg sPaces
in consideration of the following factors:
(l) Estimated nlmber of cals owned by occupants ofdwellings in tte PUD;
(2) Parking needs ofnon-dwelling uses;
(3) Varying time ircriods ofuse wheneverjoint use ofcornrnon parking areas is p,ro,posea
The PUD shall meet the following site plan criteria unless the applicmt cam demonstrde
ti,;t d;(ti;;;d; of them is-not irpplicable o,r trat a pratilcal solution has been
otherrrise achieved:
6) The PUD sfuall harre an ap,propriate relationship.to the surrounding are4 wi&
iriirosooaUti adrerse effects on fole sirnounding areabeing minimized.
(2) The PUD shall orovide an adequate internal street circulation syste,ln design{ forthe
irme of 6afrc cen(iated. saf€tv. siparation fiom living areas, conveni€,[ce and access.
ilri;;; i"t *"t-ttddiil"v u" ri6.ioitt"4 provided thu Ideqqaie access-for police ad. {re
protection is maintained" -Biclcle traffiCshall be provided for when the $te rs used tor
iesidential purposcs.
(3) The PUD shall provide parking- dcas 4"qox. in terms oflocatim, req circulatiom,
safety, conve,lriemce, scparation and screenrng.
(4) The PUD shall provide Common Ope,n Spacc adequate in terms oflocatio& -area ?nd
1"6"';f tt;aor,*do Cri." Sil;: ndin terins ofthiuses permitted in the PUD. The
Ffibit Ai strirJfor opfimuni preiervation of the natural ferinres of the terrain.
(5) The PUD shall provide for variety in housing types and densities, other facilities and
Common Open Space.
(6) The PUD shall provide adequate pnvacy benreen dwelling units.
(D The PUD shalt pnovide pedestrian ways adequate in ternrs of safety, sc'paration,
iohvenience, and acriess to priints of destination and attractiveness.
(8) If centralized water and/or wastewater facilities are proposed witrin the.PUD, they
l['"tt-bi-oio"iOea for i, a separate utility zone distict that strall contain its -ownilcrltr*-rff siarrd-ds. No lan-a wittrin any utility zone di-strict $4! apply towud.any
;ategory of open space calculation or requirement. The PUD shall dernonstrate how
4.07.04
4,07.05
4.07.06
corlmon water and wastewater facilities will be contolled or governed by the futureowners within the PUD. (A. 97-109)
(.9) lqny.disturbance of slopes in excess of407o, shall be the minimum necessary to meetthe deveropment_n_eedq wtth a revegetation and geotechnical plan submitted with the pUD
application. (A. 97-109)
lO)..If community facilities are proposed to be contained or allowed in the pUD. theappllcatlon shall drscuss-w^ho.-oL wh4 entity shall be responsible for the provision of andpayment folthe proposed facilities. The fal:ilities shall a]so be included'titt ii it J"rerifco[rmon tnfrastnrcfire reguirernena ofthe PUD, to includewater, wastewaterandp"rkirg
requirements. (A. 97-109)
The maximum.height of buildings may be increased above the maximum permitted forttl(e burl9Pgg -1n other zone districts in relation to the following charactd.istics of theproposed building:
(l) It's geographical location;
(2) The probable effect on surrounding slopes and mountainous terrain;
({). Urueasonable adverse visual effect on adjacent sites or other areas in the immediatevicinity;
(4) fotentiA problems for adjacent sites caused by shadowg loss ofair circulation or lossof uew;
(5) tnfluence on the general vicinity, with regard to extrerre contrast, vistas md openspace; and
(6) Uses u,ithin the proposed building.
(7) Development supportive of mass tansit operations in a TpUD. (added zooz-lz)
The modmumlot areas and fts minimum setbackrestrictionsmaybe decreased below md
the maximum lot coverage mayh increased above those appli6abie tolike-britdils inother zone disricts to aci6nrm6dae specific 6uitaing types #fi d"iirfifi;r;;il; tf;lot or.relatiorship.betrnqen buildings. The averagh! ortot arCasilaiue -p"dttA 6proude ilqryD+ryIP deslgn and to relate lot si?e to topography, but each lot Shall contain
T T9Pl?Pte builq}g,s-rte. ttte clustering.of developmart with useable coulmon op€n
areas shall be penmtted to cxlcourag€ provision for, aoil access tq conrmon open areas'andto save street and uulity consbuction and maintenance costs. Such clustirine is alsointended to accommodate contemporary buildi"g types which are .oa sdceA-inafrriA.ri;on their own lots but share comiron iiAe wa[5, tbmbined sen ice ficiiitiis ;-;i-i[iachitectural innevslisn5, whether or not providing for separate o, me"strio oa6a;abuildings. Architectural style of buildings'strall noibe a bisis for d;ying-aetr;;J of;PUD application.
The overall residential density shall be no greater than two (2) dv
gcre withi-1the puD; provide'd, horrJver,-tfiar the.counry c*,*tl$H*rH:iHi"flXT
lncrease to a maximum of fifteen ( I 5) dwelling units per iyoss acre in areas wliere public
i'3H"it$E-xr"ff j,T*r"#,'f-r$ffrri'8*$#5}sf,f,*img.;lr'gi*
zonmg classrtrc-auon allowed residential densities greater than two (2) dwelline unit! oergross acre, srch increased densities shall nwerth-eless comply witti ttre maiimum'iot
cov-eragq minimlm -setback, maximum floor area ratio, maifuirum buitains heishi and
Parklng standards_of_such prio,r zoning classification. The overall averagE resiOentiadglslty thall be calculated by summing the number ofresidential dwellinsinits olannedwrthtn the boundary ofthe PUD and ilividing by the total gross area e>rpiessedin acres
4.07.07
4.07.08
4.07.09
4.07.10
4.07.11
within the boundarv of ttre PUD. The density of dwelling units in any particular area may
be ereater thal the maxirnurn Dermitted for a like use in other zone districts. Averaging
ar{trarsfenine of densities'within the PUD shall be allowed-upon a showing-of
;llp,mu:Jit"*f, 3HHfi
"?*ffi
:"$"fl sl',.*il,[sf; ff :tx]isf Hr"3i]:7
97- I 09) (amended 2002-12)
Where ilre application is aTPUD, and showing ofconformance with tlre purpgsgs ofttris-
section is debhed appropriate by the board, limitations set onPre\nousty zonerl denslty ot
under two dwe[ins units oer sross acre may be rernoved and the applicant may propose
hisfu overall deisities'andexceed stanilard building height [iinitations otbenryise-*iE"in"a
ne"ein. oroviaea odv that standards specified in-4.07.04 are considoed- SPegtd
ahention shall 6i given to fire protection a4d eqyPmq! needs triggered by sugf .a
B6tB"*#'#:'"s1,1:XHgiJffi y*xi,",iltT'P**lsxexir'ffi r,til"
aaAtiona aSfoidable housing units (ln Snrdy Area One, qtotal of-ZOVQ with.those units
beine within 2000 fed ofthe oroposed station or terrmnal, ev€'!r ttrough prevrous zonrng
did nlot allow ttrat level of deniityfor those developme,nts within 2000 feet. The intent of
tt is sltffi ofurJi"iolution iito permit both rh'e PUD allowance of increased density
orovided that l|o/oofthe proposed inits are affordable uniS, and an additional increased
'Ae"siW. *[ere increascd deniity is proximate to and supports a transit station or tcrminal,
ild 6iA lisner de"sity *itt in 2qoQ tq" of the transit stitionor termind. .Jhe qpplicanl
ri**x',tm*ml.lffi#ix.sffi g"?r':irs:trf Hux#
109) (amendd700z-12)
The minimum nlrnber of acres thU may comprisc a PUD is nno (2) acrcs.
All uses. which are permitted in the underlying zone district-or consistentwift the lmd use
ak*"tion" in ttE Comprehensive PlfrU-or approved as an amendmeot to the
e-orilprehensive Plan, maybe permitted in PUDs. (4. 95-043' A. 97-109)
The uses which shall be permitted in mv particulr PUD shall be those pemitted by thc
resolutioi zoning the parfrcular area PUDI
Twenty-five percent (ztyt qf the total rea within the boun$arv of any P,lP.$41.flwe,lrw-Ilve Dercent
devotdd to CommonOerJtefu to-Common'ODei Space. Not more thm twenty-five percent (25yt) of Qe-
Common Open Space sfat Ue m ueaofwatgJ.classified ascommerci4.oPfl tr?F:^9-t,if,e)-3"f ;A sp-acJreq"ite,rt€,nt within PUDs, no mofe than 40% of the l5o/o total
G"irc4 sfiAt U6 [miteduse opco qpacc, *ith.tt
"
balancc.being retained gs 911e Ego,preouired- shall be limiteduse opco spacc, with the balancc bemg retatned an o4e'
;fih";nninns oDen space categories, tisted above. Provide( howwcr, ttrat the
Commissioners-_miry reduce such-requirem^ ent ift"y fud that qugh d.ecr-ease is wt
ove. Providd howwcr, that the Cormty
they ftrd that srch d-ecrease is wurantedCommissioners mav reduce such requrreNn€nt tt th€ry tnd mat sucn cecrease lS $'araruGs
UitE Agrig, of, aiA the^amcni&simd feanrres [rcoqp3rated into. the p]gr,:f 1-rl1r1l:;'"eds-oftt ; oCci parts of the PUD for Cmmon Open-Spacc can be met in ihe proposed
PUD. (A. e7-t0e)
If any zone district wittlin the PUD is proposed to-contain time-share or fractional
ot"nlst io ,rn[i. oi ottrer iimitar interest in pioperty, thc provisions for such ownershi- p
shall be those ttiat a.e approved by ttre Board of County Commissioners at the time the
properly is zoned PUD.
Findings of the Planned Unit Developme,lrt Regulations Section: (2001aa)
It is essential and necessary fo,r the preservation and for the maintenance of the healttL
welfare, safety, and quality of life in Garfield County to €nsure the provision of
affordable housing which mitigates the impact ofnew developmeirt. Recognizing that
new development g€nerates additional emplolmr.ent needs, and being consistent with a
4.07.12
4.07.13
4.07.t4
desire to have new development mitigate impacts attributable to such development, the
Countv finds it necessary to require new development to provide affordable housing.
Housing must be affordable to the local labor force in order for the local economy t-o
remain stable and to grow in a healthy manner. (amended 2OOZ-12)
Fur[rose:
The purpose of tris Section is to implement through regulation the Housing Goats,
Objectives, Policieq and Programs of ttre Garfield CountyComprehensive plan fon
Study Area One including the following statEment: To providi alt types ofhousing
that en$res current and future residents equitable housing opportunities which are
designed to provide safe, efficient residential structures drat are compatible with and
that protect the natural environment".
The Garfield County land use review process will consider the housing needs of all
economic segments ofthe cornmunity, and will assrue that the impacts-ofnew
dwelopme,nt will be mitigate( to the extent feasible to assure an-adequate affordable
housing supply in the County. While the County recognizes that atrorOable housing is
most desirable in br adjacent to towns, new developments ttroughout the
unincorporated colmty are creating demands for workers in construction, maintenancq
sei:nices, and retail sales.
Ge,neral:
This Section applies to all Planned Unit Development applications, which include
residential development in the Garfield County Comprehensive,Flan's StuS l\re4 l,
Definitions:
For purposes of this section of tre ZoningResolution regulationq affordable housing is
defined as resideirt-occupied housing units, the sale or rental ofwhich units have bJn
limited to specific segments of the market wittr permane,nt affordability innred dpough
appreciation rates controlled by deed restriction or another legally-binding mechanism
approved by the County Commission.
For the purpose ofthis section of the Zoning Resolutio4 unit is defined as a building
used for residential occupancy w-hich meets crurent Coung Building Codg not
clirssified as a mobile homq and whictr contains one (l) cornplete kitchen, at least one(l) complete bathroorq at least one (l) living are4 and fiom one (l) to six (6) bedrooms
which is to be occupied by a single fanily living independently of any ottrer family.
(t) Eligibility'Affordable housing units will be made available to fult-time residents
and/or employees in Garfield County who have a cumulative net worth, minus qualified
retirement assets, not in otcess of $100,000.00 and who satis$ the inconre criteria set
forth in ttre Gar6eld County Affordable Housing Guidelines. A full time reside,nt is one
who will live at least ten months ayetr in the affordable unit. A full time employee is
4.07.15
4.07.1s.01
4.07.t5.02
one who works or will work at least 32 hours per week for a Garfield County based
employment source. A person who has been recruited to work for a Garfield County
based employurent source must produce evide,nce of an offer of future employment.
Priority will be given to Garfield County employees.
(2) Resale - The resale of affondable housing units will not exceed $e pruchase price
plus the value of capital improvements authorized by dre Housing Authority and the
annual perc€ntage increase in the annual Denver/ Boulder Urban Wage Earners CPI or
37q whichever is less. Affordable housing units will have a deed restriction canried
with tre titlq which will regulate future sales to qualified residents who meet residency
requirements, asset limitationg and appreciation rates'
(3) Management - Ongoing management of the deed restictions will be a&ninistered by
the Garfield County Housing Authority, or another approved housing agency, according
to an agreemqrt brought forward by the applicant and approved by the County
Commission. That agreqn€nt witl also stipul*e the means of determining the allocation
of units, any proposed fees to fund the management agreement, and any other necessary
terms. The agreement will be adopted as Part ofthe final plat. The County will
maintain a liS of ryproved housing agencies in the Planning Directot's office.
Requirernmts:
In order to firlfill the goals ofthe Comprehensive Plan while directing growth into the
areas designated in thatplan" requirements will be based on the Proposed Latd Usc
Disuicts frm the Comprehensive Plan.
For Lands Desienated High Densitv Residential, '
(l) Plarmed Unit Developments - All Planned Unit Development proposalg and
Planned Unit Dwelopnent Amendment requests which results in an increase in density'
must provide that at least 10% of the housing mix re affordable housing uniS.
Providing l0% affo,rdable housing units will not, byitsclfl be sufficient to fulfill the
PUD require,melrt for a variety ofhousing types and dcnsities [Section 4.07.03(5I.
(2) OfFsite - Given that these lands have been planned for nro or less acres per
dwelling uni! these are the locations most srited for affordable housing. OGsite
proposals will only be approved by the County Cormnissioners if the applicant can
dernonstrate circurnstances that would justify an o$sitc option. In amy event, the
applicant must show that affordable housing units meet the requiremeirts ofthese
regulations and the Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelineq and that these
housing units will actually be built in Study Area l. No cash-in-lieu palmre'nt will be
accepted.
For Lands With Anv Land Use DesiCnation Ottrer Than Hieh Density Residential:
(l) Planned Unit Develo,pmcnts - All Planned Unit Development proposals, and Plaucd
Unit Development Amen&nent requests which resrlts in an increase in density, must