HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application•
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
•
'RECEIVED
91 2003
Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 RFIELD COUNTY
www.garfield-county.com 41 9''DING P; ANN!N(
Zone District / Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
GENERAL INFORMATION
(To be completed by the applicant.)
• Name of Property Owner: LB Rose Ranch LLC
➢ Address: 1007 Westbank Road Telephone: (970)384-0169
• City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970)384-0170
• Name of Applicant (if other than owner): N/A
➢ Address: Telephone:
➢ City: State: Zip Code: FAX:
• Street Address / General Location of Property: 1007 Westbank Road, Glenwood
Springs, CO 81601
➢ Legal Description: (Attached)
➢ Existing Use & Size of Property (in acres): Residential Subdivision (PUD) — 534 acre:
more or less
• Property's Current Zone District Designation: Planned Unit Development
➢ Proposed Zone District Designation: Amendment to Existing Planned Unit
Development Zoning
➢ Property's Current Comprehensive Plan Designation: High Density Residential
• Doc. No.:
➢ Planner:
STAFF USE ONLY
Date Submitted: TC Date:
Hearing Date:
• •
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any additional information to
be submitted with this application:
1. The Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review for rezoning land
in the county. The standard used to review a rezoning request depends on whether the
proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. If so, the proposed rezoning
need only bear a reasonable relationship to the general welfare of the community. If the
rezoning would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, the Applicant generally needs to
show either 1) that an error was made in establishing the current zoning, or 2) that there has
been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood that supports the requested zone change.
Depending on the subject property's Comprehensive Plan designation as mentioned above,
you will need to appropriately address one of the following standards in a narrative form being
as descriptive and specific as possible:
A. The proposed rezoning for the subject property is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan. As such, the proposed rezoning bears a reasonable
relationship to the general welfare of the community.
B. If the rezoning would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, the Applicant
generally needs to show either 1) that an error was made in establishing the current
zoning, or 2) that there has been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood that
supports the requested zone change.
2. If the proposed zoning of the subject property conflicts with the current designation as defined
on the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Districts Map, an Applicant may wish to
amend the Comprehensive Plan designation so that the proposed rezoning does not conflict
with the Comprehensive Plan Map. If an Applicant requests to amend this Map, they will need
to provide a thorough narrative that shows how their proposed Comprehensive Plan
designation is better suited than the existing designation by addressing the goals, objectives,
policies, and programs listed for that designation in the Comprehensive Plan. This information
can be obtained from the Building and Planning Department upon request.
3. Submit a zoning map showing the current zoning of the subject property and adjacent
properties.
4. Submit a vicinity map showing relative location of the property at a scale of 1" = 2000', and
extending at least 1/2 mile from all property boundaries.
5. Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all
mineral rights owners of the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to the
property.
6. Submit a list of all property owners and their addresses adjacent to or within 200 ft. of the site.
This information can be obtained from the Assessor's Office.
7. Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property.
8. If you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement
from the property owner that you may act in his/her behalf.
• •
9. Submit payment of the $450.00 Base Fee: Applicant shall sign the "Agreement for Payment"
form and provide the fee with the application.
10. Submit 2 copies of this completed application form and all the required submittal materials to
the Building and Planning Department. Staff will request additional copies once the application
has been deemed technically complete.
II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
(A Zone District Map Amendment is considered a two step process because it is first reviewed by
the Planning Commission which makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissions.
The following steps outline how the Zone District Map Amendment application review process
works in Garfield County.)
1. Submit this completed application form (pages 1-4), base fee, and all submittal requirements to
the Garfield County Planning Department. It will be received and given to a Staff Planner who
will review the application for technical completeness.
2. Once the application is deemed technically complete, the Staff Planner will send you a letter
indicating the application is complete. In addition, the letter will indicate the dates and times
scheduled for your request to be heard before the Planning Commission during a public
meeting (no notice required) and the Board of County Commissioners during a public hearing
(notice required). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation to the Board of
County Commissioners to be considered during a properly noticed public hearing. Staff will
send you the appropriate "Public Notice Form(s)" indicating the time and date of your public
hearing and will provide you with a Staff Memorandum regarding your requested Zone District
Amendment. (If Staff determines your application to be deficient, a letter will be sent to you
indicating that additional information is needed to deem your application complete.)
3. Please note, if an application includes a request to amend the current designation as defined
on the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Districts Map, the request may be
considered at the same meeting before the Planning Commission. However, the request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be considered prior to the request to amend the zoning
map. In addition, the Applicant shall be required to provide proper notice (as described below)
for the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the Planning Commission to hold a
public hearing on the request. Further, the Planning Commission is the final decision maker on
the Comprehensive Plan amendment request whereas the Planning Commission will make a
recommendation on the rezoning request to the Board of County Commissioners.
4. It is solely the Applicant's responsibility to ensure proper noticing occurs regarding the public
hearing before the Planning Commission and / or the Board of County Commissioners. If
proper notice has not occurred, the public hearing will not occur. Notice requirements are as
follows:
a. Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot,
a description of the proposed amendment and nature of the hearing, and the date, time
and place for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in
that portion of the County in which the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but
not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of such hearing, and proof of
publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant.
b. Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (1) above, shall be
mailed to all owners of record as shown in the County Assessor's Office of lots within
• •
two hundred feet (200') of the subject lot and to all owners of mineral interest in the
subject property at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such
hearing time by certified return receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the
hearing by the applicant.
c. The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a
public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The
posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the
hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and
ensure that it remains posted until and during the date of the hearing.
5. The Applicant is required to appear before the Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners at the time and date of the public meeting / hearing at which time they will
consider the request. In addition, the Applicant shall provide proof at the hearing before the
Board of County Commissioners (and Planning Commission for an Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan) that proper notice was provided.
6. Once the Planning Commission and/ or the Board of County Commissioners make a decision
regarding the request(s), Staff will provide the Applicant with a signed resolution memorializing
the action taken by either Board. Following the Boards' approval, this office will change the
property's zoning designation on the zoning map and the Comprehensive Plan Map (if so
decided) if approved.
I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is
accurate to the best of my knowledge.
(Signature of applican owner)
Last Revised: 12/02/2002
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470
www.garfield-county.com
Subdivision Application Form
GENERAL INFORMATION
(To be completed by the applicant.)
➢ Subdivision Name: IronBridge PUD (formerly Rose Ranch PUD)
• Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types):
Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan '1 Final Plat
➢ Name of Property Owner: LB Rose Ranch LLC
➢ Address: 1007 Westbank Road Telephone: (970)384-0169
➢ City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970)384-0170
• Name of Applicant (if other than owner): N/A
• Address: Telephone:
➢ City: State: Zip Code: FAX:
➢ Name of Engineer: High Country Engineering, Inc
• Address: 1517 Blake Avenue Telephone: (970)945-8676
➢ City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970)945-2555
➢ Name of Surveyor: High Country Engineering, Inc.
➢ Address: 1517 Blake Ave Telephone: (970)945-8676
➢ City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970)945-2555
Name of Planner: Mike Staheli, LB Rose Ranch LLC
➢ Address: 1007 Westbank Road Telephone: (970)384-0169
➢ City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 FAX: (970)384-0170
GENERAL INFORMATION continued...
➢ Location of Property: Section 11 and 12 Township 7 South Range 89 West
➢ Practical Location / Address of Property: 1007 Westbank Road, Glenwood Springs,
CO 81601
➢ Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres): 534 acres, more or less
➢ Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision: 322
➢ Property Current Land Use Designation:
1. Property's Current Zone District: Planned Unit Development
2. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: High Density Residential
Proposed Utility Service:
➢ Proposed Water Source: Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
➢ Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: Roaring Fork Water and Santitation District
➢ Proposed Public Access VIA: County Road 109
➢ Easements: Utility: County Road 109
Ditch: Robertson Ditch
➢ Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below):
➢ See PUD and Preliminary Plan Maps provided herewith
1) Residential
Units / Lots
Size (Acres)
Parking Provided
Single -Family
Duplex
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
Totz
Floor Area (sq. ft.)
Size (Acres)
Parking Provided
2) Commercial
3) Industrial
I) Public / Quasi-Public
5) Open Space / Common Area
Tote
➢ Base Fee of $200 paid on
➢ Plat Review Fee of $50 paid on
2
• •
I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS
In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use
processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and
3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide
general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision
approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for
purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following
address: http://www.garfield-county.com/building and planning/index.htm
A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to
propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield
County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with
the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any
issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued.
2. Applicability
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process.
More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the
division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or
separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or
other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing
Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the
Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the
resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments.
Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the
specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to
satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this
application form.
4. Process / Public Meeting
The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1 -step process because the
application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order
to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all
required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning
Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the
application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as
required.
If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
3
• •
scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the
applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review.
If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the
applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the
Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically
complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,
the application will be terminated.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will
conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory
documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the
Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments
provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.
As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning
Commission containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will
also be furnished in advance to the applicant.
At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff
will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to
present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by
the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning
Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will
be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1 -year from the meeting date before the
Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to
the Planning Department within the 1 -year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be
closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a
Preliminary Plan review.
B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of
the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the
purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most
intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission,
and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all
the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory
requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues
in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision
Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as well as other state and local referral
agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the
process that will either approve or deny the application request.
4
• •
2. Applicability
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield
County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision
as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or
separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or
other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already
completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3:00 of the
Subdivision Regulations.
An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this
application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to
4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and
Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations.
In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision
project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so
that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC
which is addressed in Sections 4:20 — 4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations.
4. Process / Public Hearings
The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2 -step process because the
application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-making entities during public
hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC.
In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and
the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal
requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted,
Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required
submittal information has been submitted as required.
If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff
will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted.
If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
5
• •
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the
applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the
Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically
complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,
the application will be terminated.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application,
Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use
regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and
the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments
provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.
As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning
Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This
Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant prior to the public
hearings.
As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and
the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The
Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is
responsible for making a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or
denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a
regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the
Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the
applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity
regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or
deny the application.
If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval
shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval,
or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted
by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific
information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the
hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the
action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk
and Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are
required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final
Plat Review.
C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a
mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during
the Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of
the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will
6
• •
sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted
by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County's subdivision process.
2. Applicability
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision
process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot,
tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or
the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling
units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the
Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision
Regulations.
An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form,
all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of the Subdivision
Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the
Preliminary Plan review process.
4. Process
The Final Plat review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application
is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC
for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the
satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department.
If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or
meeting and therefore does not require public notice.)
If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the
application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information
satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of
approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for
review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification
issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to
have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all
required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department
7
• •
and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at
the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to
authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat.
Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and
Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet
thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final
Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process.
Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the
Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of
the applicant to complete the Final Plat process.
Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a
general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield
County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase
the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations
or access them on-line at:
http://www.garfield-county.com/buildinQ.and planning/index.htm
in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the
three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review,
and Final Plat Review.
I have re. • the statements above and have provided the required attached information
w '•r s,iorrect and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
AO'
(Signature of applicant/owner)
Last Revised: 11/21/2002
8
ate
ate
• •
I RONBRID GE
January 9, 2003
Mark Bean
Garfield County Building & Planning Department
109 8t' Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Rose Ranch PUD & Preliminary Plan Modifications
Dear Mark,
RECEIVED
JAN 0 q 2003
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
LB Rose Ranch LLC, developer of Rose Ranch PUD, requests that the County approve a
number of modifications to the Rose Ranch PUD, Preliminary Plan and Phase 1 Final
Plat approvals that were received by Roaring Fork Investments L.L.C. in 1998 and 1999.
As you are aware, the PUD, Preliminary Plan and Final Plat overlap in many areas. As
such, some of the requested modifications will pertain to more than one of these
approvals. We therefore wish to pursue amendments to the PUD, Preliminary Plan and
Phase 1 Final Plat simultaneously.
The requested modifications may be summarized into five general categories.
1. Changes to the Preliminary Plan Construction Documents resulting from field
conditions and design inefficiencies identified during the construction process.
2. PUD Map Changes
3. Zoning text modifications.
4. Affordable Housing Requirements.
5. Miscellaneous
In that we have some uncertainty as to which modifications may be approved
administratively and which must go through the public hearing process, we are
submitting all issues in a single document to allow County staff to view the package in its
entirety. We are prepared to split these issues into two proposals if requested to do so.
As an aside, LB Rose Ranch has decided to market the Rose Ranch PUD under the name
of Ironbridge. All homeowners association documents will be restated during the next
few weeks to identify the new name of the community. Where appropriate we want to
incorporate the name change into the amended approvals with the County.
The following paragraphs describe the necessary modifications required to the PUD,
Preliminary Plan and Final Plat approvals.
PUD Amendment Proposa•
January 9, 2003
Page 2 of 8
1. Modifications to the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat Construction Documents
During the construction of improvements depicted in the Preliminary Plan
Construction Documents, the Developer, its contractors and High Country
Engineering identified a number of changes that were required to (i) address field
conditions, (ii) satisfy Roaring Fork Water & Sanitary District requirements, (iii)
respond to neighboring property owner issues, and (iv) solve conflicts between
golf course and residential uses identified during construction.
Many of these issues have already been discussed and resolved with County and
District staff in an informal way. During the construction of improvements
during the past 2 years, Richard Nash and other Rose Ranch contractors and
consultants have met numerous times with Garfield County Road & Bridge
Department staff members and RF Water & Sanitation District staff members to
resolve conflicts and discrepancies between designs and field conditions that were
discovered in the field. This request is an attempt to obtain final approval on all
need modifications to the Construction Documents that were integral to our
Preliminary Plan approval.
All of our requested modifications to construction documents have been
incorporated into a set of Amended Construction Documents by High Country
Engineering and summarized in Exhibit A. The Amended Construction
Documents are being supplied to you under a separate cover letter coincident with
this application.
2. Modification to Rose Ranch PUD Map
Enclosed hereto as Exhibit B is a Rose Ranch PUD Map that depicts a number of
proposed revisions to the Rose Ranch PUD Map (Amendment No. 1) recorded on
Sept. 11, 2000. These revisions include the relocation of the Regional Trail which
runs along CR 109; the modification of boundaries for zone districts; the
elimination of certain zone districts; the elimination of potential overlooks and the
re -alignment of an interior path system.
Regional Trail. It is proposed that Rose Ranch be allowed to construct the
Regional Trail along the east side of CR109 from the southern most boundary of
Rose Ranch to a termination point at the intersection opposite the Westbank
Ranch subdivision entryway. We believe this will eliminate any conflicts that
may have otherwise occurred between pedestrians, bicycles and golf carts where
the cart path and the regional path were to co -exist. If this relocation is approved
by the County, the County will need to vacate the previously dedicated trail
easement and accept the dedication of a new easement coincident with the filing
of the amended plat.
PUD Amendment Propos•
January 9, 2003
Page 3 of 8
Golf11 Elimination. We propose that the Golf II zone district be eliminated and
that the Golf Course Zone District be expanded to include the area previously
designated as Golf II. The primary distinction between Golf Course and Golf II
was the allowance in Golf II of an affordable apartment complex. We would like
to satisfy the Affordable Housing requirements with 10 on-site owner occupied
single family homes and 20 on-site accessory dwelling units (see Section 4,
below). We therefore would not need the Golf II zone district and propose to
eliminate it.
Community Park Elimination. We propose that the 2.14 acre Community Park
area be eliminated and that the fitness/pool/tennis complex located in this area be
alternatively located within the Golf Zone District and be owned and operated by
the Club at Ironbridge. Under this alternative, a sports membership will be
included in the sale of each lot or residence at Ironbridge, giving all Ironbridge
residents the opportunity to use the fitness/pool/tennis complex if they so desire.
Residents would have the option of activating their sports membership if they so
desired by the payment of monthly club dues.
We believe there are several good reasons to have the fitness/pool/tennis complex
belong to the Club rather than the Ironbridge Property Owners Association.
a) The number of families using this facility will expand beyond the number
owning property at Ironbridge (previously Rose Ranch).
b) The cost to operate and maintain the fitness complex would be shared by
all of the golf members (totaling 450), plus those Ironbridge (Rose Ranch)
residents who only want to have a sports membership. We anticipate that
the annual operating costs of this facility will approach $500,000 during
the initial years. If only the 300 property owners were maintaining this
facility, the cost to them would be approximately $140/month. If the
complex is a part of the golf club, the number of users increases to
approximately 650 and the cost per month to the property owners who do
not wish to join the golf club drops to $65/month.
c) Because the developer will include the initiation fee for a sports
membership in the sale price of each lot, all residents of Ironbridge will
have the option of being a member of the fitness/pool/tennis complex, but
not the obligation. Residents who do not want to expend $65/month can
decline the opportunity to have a sports membership in the club.
d) Shifting the ownership and management of fitness complex from the
property owners association to the club eliminates the substantial
administrative responsibilities of the association. The oversight and
PUD Amendment Propos,/
January 9, 2003
Page 4 of 8
management of the association is limited to landscape maintenance, thus
dramatically simplifying the association's operating practices.
Creation of PA 22. We propose that planning area 22 (PA 22) be created in the
area located immediately east of the Golf Course driving range and south of the
overhead transmission lines. This area would be approximate 2.5 acres in size,
zoned Medium Density Residential (see Zoning Text changes, below) and
accommodate 10 deed -restricted single family homes that would comply with the
affordable housing guidelines of Garfield County. (See Section 4. Affordable
Housing, below, for additional information.)
Interior Paths & Overlooks. On the revised Rose Ranch PUD map, we would
like to modify the interior path locations and remove references to overlooks. The
new path plan envisions a paved Bike Path that facilitates bike and pedestrian
traffic through the interior of the community with connection points to the
Regional Trail along CR 109. It also envisions a path that is meant to organize
pedestrian activities through the Roaring Fork River corridor to a single, unpaved
trail (Roaring Fork Trail). The Roaring Fork Trail would be accessible in
approximately four locations via access points from the interior Bike Path. We
would like approval to modify the restrictions within the blue heron protection
area and the related screening requirements in a way that allows a 10 foot strip of
land behind Phase 1 lots 95 and 96 to allow the southern most end of the Roaring
Fork Trail to terminate at the Bike Path within Phase 1, between lots 96 and 106.
We met with Division of Wildlife representative Justin Martins to discuss this
possibility. He was willing to consider it if the screening was installed on the
south side of the path, if the path was not paved and if people were required to
leash their dogs.
3. Zoning Text Modifications
Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a revised "Land Use Summary Table and
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text" that would replace the table and text included in
Resolution 98-80, and so modified by Resolution 99-067. The following is a
summary of the proposed modifications to the Land Use Summary:
a) Change Duplex Lots designation to Medium Density Residential.
b) Change Club Homes designation to Club Villas and reduce the number of
approved units from 67 to 47.
c) Eliminate reference to Golf II, Clubhouse Apartments.
d) Create PA 22, Medium Density Residential with 10 units in approx. 2.5
acres.
PUD Amendment Propos.
January 9, 2003
Page 5 of 8
e) Adjust the Subtotal Units from 322 to 302, with the ability to allocate a
total of 20 accessory dwelling units to planning areas zoned "20,000 s.f.",
"15,000 s.f.", and "9,000 s.f.".
f) Eliminate Community Park use under Common Open Space.
Precise acreage calculations and "% of Total" calculations shall be completed for
the Land Use Summary tables prior to final County approval.
The Zoning Text changes are highlighted in a redline version included in Exhibit
C, comparing the approved Zoning Text with the proposed "Revised" Zoning
Text. In general an attempt was made to make the zoning definitions more
flexible in the "Duplex Residential" and "Club Homes" zones to allow future
planning to respond to market demands. Also, the definition of Golf Course was
modified to allow for the inclusion of the fitness/pool/tennis complex.
4. Affordable Housing Requirements
Under the Rose Ranch PUD Subdivision Improvements Agreement,
• 10 affordable housing units shall be constructed within a single structure
located within Golf Course Parcel 6;
• construction shall be completed and the units shall be made available for
rent prior to time that the County has issued more than 50% of the Phase 1
building permits;
• the golf course cannot be operated unless satisfactory security is provided
for the completion of the 10 affordable housing units;
• no additional phases or subdivision may be pursued until the 10 units are
provided;
• the 10 affordable housing units shall be deemed acceptable to the County
prior to the expiration of the SIA.
We would like to make the following proposal which, we believe, will enhance
the quality of life for residence of the affordable housing units and will improve
the integration of the affordable housing units with other community elements.
1. The 10 affordable rental units required for Phase 1 shall be constructed as
accessory dwelling units to 10 of the 66 houses constructed on interior lots
located within planning areas 10 — 13 and 15 — 18 within Phase 1. These
ADUs will be owned and maintained by the individual property owners on
whose lots these ADUs reside. The lots will be deed restricted in a
manner acceptable to the County and the Garfield County Affordable
PUD Amendment Propose
January 9, 2003
Page 6 of 8
Housing Authority. The 10 units will have 1 bedroom and range in size
from 400 to 600 s.f.
2. 10 affordable units will be located in a newly -created planning area (PA
22) situated immediately east of the golf driving range and south of the
overhead transmission lines. These 10 units will be owner -occupied
single family homes with 3 to 4 bedrooms. The single family lots will be
deed restricted in a manner acceptable to the County and the Garfield
County Affordable Housing Authority.
3. 10 additional affordable housing units will be constructed as 1 bedroom
ADUs in subsequent phases of Ironbridge in the following zone districts:
20,000 SF Residential, 15,000 SF Residential and 9,000 SF Residential.
For each additional ADU that is constructed within Phase 1 beyond the
required 10 units, the number of ADUs to be situated in subsequent phases
shall be reduced by one.
4. The obligation to provide 10 affordable housing units within Phase 1 shall
be secured by the following instruments:
a) a deed of trust recorded on PA 22 in favor of the County of Garfield in
the amount of $500,000
b) a deed restriction recorded on PA 22 which stipulates the land use as
10 owner -occupied, single family affordable housing units.
5. In an effort to acknowledge that it will take several years to fully build out
the Phase 1 neighborhood, the County will require that at least 15% of the
housing constructed on the 66 Phase 1 interior lots shall contain deed -
restricted accessory dwelling units until such time as all 10 units are
constructed and made available for rent. In the event that 2 of the first 12
units constructed on the interior Phase 1 lots do not contain ADUs, or if
after the first 12 homes the number of percentage of units with ADUs falls
below 15%, then the Owner shall place $100,000 for each deficient ADU
into an escrow account, which funds shall be used for the construction of
an ADU in Phase 1 or subsequent phases.
We believe that the provision of affordable housing in the manner described
above will result in units that are well-maintained. We feel that the dispersion of
20 ADU units through out the community will result in a higher quality of life for
the tenants than if the units were assembled within one apartment complex.
Based upon our experience with ADUs in the valley, we anticipate the owners of
houses with ADUs will substantially rely upon the additional rental income
coming from the ADUs to help them pay the mortgage payments on their homes
and will have an incentive to keep them occupied. We are aware that the deed
restriction on the ADUs will have to clarify the responsibility of the owner to
PUD Amendment Propos*
January 9, 2003
Page 7 of 8
keep them occupied within the rental parameters published by the Garfield
County Affordable Housing Authority. Finally, under the existing requirements
stipulated in the PUD approvals, the developer would have an incentive to look
offsite at older housing stock to fulfill its obligations for 20 additional units.
Under this proposal, the affordable housing is kept on site and physical condition
of these 30 units is new.
5. Miscellaneous Items
Construction Activities adjacent to Blue Heron Conservation Area. By way of
clarification, Paragraph B.1.m of Resolution 98-80 states that the construction of homes
shall not occur on lots 94 — 96 and 108 - 118 from February 15 through May 31. We are
under the presumption that this is a restriction against any construction activities on the
exterior of the house between these dates and that work can proceed on the interior where
is does not impact the activities of the Blue Heron.
Street Name Changes. In November, we forwarded a list of street names to the County
that we desire to use in the Ironbridge community for Phase 1 as well as future phases.
We received confirmation that the suggested names were acceptable. We want to include
the modification of street names to be included in this formal amendment process and
have changed the names of streets within the proposed Amended Final Plat for Phase 1.
The changes can be summarized as follows:
Old Name
Tamora Drive
River Edge Road
Bear Grass Road
Blue Heron Way
White Peaks Lane
New Name
Ironbridge Drive
River Bend Way
Elk Valley Drive
Silver Mountain Drive
Winding Meadow Way
Please refer to the Amended Final Plat for locations of these streets.
Modification to Lot Locations. After reviewing the as -built location of the golf course,
there appears to be enough land next to Loti9 to add an additional lot. We propose that
a new lot be created in this location on the Preliminary Plan, called Lot 19A. In order to
keep the total number of lots unchanged, we would eliminate Lot 62 from the Preliminary
Plan in exchange for the create of Loti 9A.
We look forward to discussing these proposed modifications in greater detail with
Garfield County staff and the Board of Commissioners during the coming weeks. The
following individuals are available at your request to provide additional information in
the interim:
PUD Amendment Propos,/
January 9, 2003
Page 8 of 8
Michael Staheli, General Manager, Ironbridge
Richard Nash, Construction Manager, Ironbridge
Tim Thulson, Attorney, Balcomb & Green
Eric Tuin, Engineer, High Country Engineering
Sincerely,
LB ROSE RANCH LLC
Michael L. Staheli
General Manager, Ironbridge
cc: Tim Thulson, Balcomb & Green
Tom Schmidt
Eric Tunin, High Country Engineering
(970) 384-0169
(970) 384-0169
(970) 945-6546
(303) 925-0544
river path access corridor between Tots 15 and 16; and (iii) the elimination of lot 62.
• •
Exhibit "A"
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO PRELIMINARY PLAN
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS for Phase 1 Rose Ranch PUD dated 6/18/99
The following is an itemized list of requested revisions to the Preliminary Plan
Construction Documents. An amended set of Preliminary Plan Construction Documents
will be submitted to the County under a separate cover letter. The requested
modifications listed below that apply to both the Preliminary Plan and the Final Plat are
designated with an asterisks ( *) Each of the following items references the pertinent
sheet from the approved Preliminary Plan Construction Documents.
1. Cover Sheet — Titles on this sheet shall be changed to read: "Amended Construction
Documents", "Revised Preliminary Plan 12/31/02", "Only sheets included in set have
been revised, all others remain the same"
2. *Plat Sheet 1 of 8 — The lot area (S.F.) for lots 16, 77, 78, 79, 105 and 171 have
been modified and Lot 79a has been added. We are deleting Lot 62 to maintain
the total number of lots at 292. As a result of these changes, the lot acreage
total will change from to of 534.189 ac. Total
3. *Plat Sheet 2 of 8 — The Westbank underpass easement was enlarged to allow
for grading and revisions to underpass material and orientation. Also, sections of
the Robertson Ditch easement were relocated to straighten the ditch and allow
the ditch to work with golf course grading. Separately, a proposed lot line
adjustment occurred to the Golf parcel adjacent to Block 3 to allow the new
routing of the golf hole. In addition, the water tank easement was moved up the
hill to satisfy elevation requirements of the RF Water & Sanitation District.
Finally, the revised sheet shows the new location of regional trail and the
changes to lots 77, 78, 79, 105 and 171 and addition of lot 79a (described on
Item #2, above). It also shows a 15' wide, newly -created river access corridor
between Lots 15 and 16.
4. *Plat Sheet 3 of 8 — Westbank underpass easement enlarged as described in Item
#3, above.
5. *Plat Sheet 4 of 8 — Modifications to Robertson Ditch easement and Westbank
underpass, as described above in Items #3 and #4. Separately, the sheet shows (i)
a proposed termination of the regional trail at the intersection of Road M Road; (ii) a
6. *Plat Sheet 5 of 8 — Shows modifications to Robertson Ditch easement and property
line adjustments for Golf parcel, Block 3, and lots 77, 78, and 79. Also, shows the
addition of lot 79a.
Exhibit A 1 •
Proposed Amendments to Preliminary Plan Construction Documents
January 9, 2003
Page 2 of 4
7. *Plat Sheet 6 — Modifications entail the above-described changes to Robertson Ditch
easement and Regional Trail easement.
8. *Plat Sheet 7 — Shows the above described Regional Trail easement relocation and
a newly -created easement benefiting the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District.
9. *Sheet 10 of 77 — (Grading & Drainage Plan) — Sheet reflections modifications to
Water tank location, water tank access road, Regional Trail, and golf grading. In
addition, the dimension of the underpass is modified to increase width from 10' to 12'
and underpass length from 90' to 190'. This sheet also shows modifications to the
intersection located at County Road 109 and River Edge Road, where site conditions
required a narrower intersection width.
10. Sheet 11 of 77 — Sheet shows the removal of culvert #7 due to the relocation of Pond
B (see Item #11) and the piping of the Robertson Ditch. It also reflects the lot line
adjustments for Lots 105 and 171.
11. Sheet 12 of 77 — The sheet shows the relocation of culverts crossing County Road
109, in accordance with County Road and Bridge Department direction. Also, in that
the Robertson Ditch is being piped west of "Road H", the retaining wall previously
shown on this sheet has been removed. This sheet also shows the new location of
Pond B. Pond G has been eliminated. In addition, the golf cart underpass that
crosses CR 109 has been omitted as a result of a revision in the routing of the golf
course.
12. Sheet 13 of 77 — The sheet shows revisions to the Robertson Ditch, as described
above.
13. Sheet 14 of 77 — The sheet reflects the piping of the Robertson Ditch, as -built grading
on the golf course and the removal of culvert 18A and Pond C. It also shows a
revision to Culvert 17 and lot line revisions to Golf parcel, and lots 77, 78, 79, and
79a. Also, this sheet shows the relocation of one CR109 culvert, as described above
in Item #11.
14. Sheet 15 of 77 — This sheet shows as -built golf course grading and the piping of the
Robertson Ditch.
15. Sheet 16 of 77 — This sheet shows the as -built golf course grading, modifications to
ponds H and E and the elimination of Pond D. This sheet also shows changes to
the Robertson Ditch and Westbank underpass (as noted above). Also shown is the
15' wide access corridor created between Lots 15 & 16.
16. *Sheet 17 of 77 — Modifications to the water tank site as described above on Sheets
2 and 10 above. The sheet also shows the as -built golf course grading and
modifications to the CR109 underpass as described in Item #9.
Exhibit A • •
Proposed Amendments to Preliminary Plan Construction Documents
January 9, 2003
Page 3 of 4
17. *Sheet 18 of 77 — Modifications to sheet show (i) the removal of CR109
underpass, (ii) the reflection of as -built golf course grading and (iii) the relocation
of CR 109 culverts.
18. Sheet 19 of 77 — The sheet shows modifications required on CR109 underpass
coming from the ravine which were the result of site conditions and existing utility
locations. Modifications to the original designs include grading changes, orientation
to the ravine, and construction materials.
19. Sheet 20 and 21 of 77 — The sheet reflects the following necessary changes to the
debris flow structure as further detailed on Sheet 67 of 77: grading, construction
materials and structure orientation. The sheet also reflects the as -built golf course
grading. Note: All Debris Flow Structure changes were engineered by High
Country Engineering to meet government standards.
20. *Sheet 40 of 77 — As described above, this sheet reflects additional changes to the
water tank site as required by the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District. PRV
location also changed due at the direction of the District. New water tank access
road location and water tank drain routing are reflected herein.
21. *Sheet 41 of 77 — The sheet shows PRV location changes and minor utility location
changes.
22. *Sheet 42 - 44 of 77 — The sheet shows relocation of sewer force main from west to
east side of Road M.
23. Sheet 45 and 46 of 77 — The sheet reflects Water Treatment Plant site changes as
required by the District and the elimination of on golf course.
24. Sheet 64 - 65 of 77 — Sheet 64 and 65 are being omitted and replaced by Sheet 1 of
1 by Smith and Loveless Inc. drawing dated 7-15-1999, as per the Districts direction.
25. Sheet 67 of 77 - Debris structure detail changes resulting from a change in
construction materials from wood to earth, as engineered by High Country
Engineering. Also, modifications to Regional Trail sections and specifications.
(Change 6" asphalt to 4")
26. Sheet 68 of 77 — Shows PRV detail revisions and sample tap detail revisions, as per
RF Water & San District.
27. Sheet 68a and 68b of 77 — New Sheet. Shows lift station building modifications.
New drawing required.
28. Sheet 69 of 77 — Sheet shows modifications to Water & Sewer Main Notes and
Details as per District requirements.
Exhibit A 0 •
Proposed Amendments to Preliminary Plan Construction Documents
January 9, 2003
Page 4 of 4
29. Sheet 75 of 77 — Sheet reflects as -built golf course grading.
30. Sheet 76 of 77 — Sheet shows relocation of District's water main to west side of CR
109 due to Right of Way issues.
• •
Figure 1
Land Use Summary
P.U.D.
1. RESIDENTIAL MIN. LOT SIZE
PA1
PA2
PA3
PA4
PA5
PA6
PA7
PA8
PA9
PA10
PA11
PA12
PA13
PA14
PA15
PA16
PA17
PA18
PA19
PA20
PA21
Golf II
SUBTOTAL:
2. ROADS
SUBTOTAL:
15,000 S.F.
20,000 S.F.
River Res. 1
20,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
River Res. 1
River Res. 1
15,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
20,1000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
Duplex Lots
Club Homes
9,000 S.F.
Clubhouse Apartments
UNITS ACRES
6 2.63
9 5.5
13 14.3
8 4.15
8 2.96
14 5.62
9 3.21
8 6.31
17 12.3
4 1.42
7 2.41
6 2.16
16 6.96
2 0.45
10 6.3
8 3.58
18 7.55
4 1.45
74 13.55
67 11.19
4 1.37
10
322 115.88
3. COMMON OPEN SPACE
Community Park
Golf Course
Community Open Space
SUBTOTAL:
TOTAL ACREAGE
GROSS DENSITY
COMMERCIAL USE
(MAXIMUM)
RESIDENTIAL DATA
PLANNING AREA
0.60 DU/AC
25,000 SQUARE FEET
MIN. LOT SIZE
PUD Res.
OF TOTAL
ACRES
26.27
ACRES
2.14
222.18
167.0
391.35
533.5
UNITS
21.7%a
% OF TOTAL
4.9%
% OF TOTAL
0.4%
41.8%
31.5%
73.4%
ACRES
100.0%
PA 3, PA 8
PA 9
PA2, PA4,PA15
PA 1, PA 5, PA 10, PA 12
PA13,PA17,PA18
PA 6, PA 7, PA 11, PA 14, PA 21
PA 19
PA 20
Golf
River Res. 1,
River Res. 2
20,000 S.F.
15,00 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
Duplex Lots
Club Homes
Clubhouse Apartments
TOTAL:
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 1
21
17
27
70
36
74
67
10
722
Exhibit
C
21.2
12.3
15.9
28.7
13.1
13.6
11.2
115.88%
A. Applicability
To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zoning
Regulations, as amended, the Rose Ranch Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Zone District is divided into the following zone district classifications:
• River Residential 1 Zone District
• (PA's 3 & 8)
• River Residential 2 Zone District
• (PA 9)
• 20,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 2, 4, & 15)
• 15,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 1, 5, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17 & 18)
• 9,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA 19)
• Duplex Residential Zone District
(PA 19)
• Club Homes Residential Zone District
• (PA 20)
• Common Open Space Zone District
• Golf Course
• Golf II
• Community Park
• Common Open Space (General)
In addition to the zone district entitled Golf II, the PUD plan identifies twenty-
one (21) distinct Planning Areas (PA's) in which residential development may
occur. Totaling 115.88 acres, the residential development will be confined to
approximately 21.7% of the site. The remainder of the site is designated for
roadways (4.9%) and Common Open Space (73.4%). Within the Common Open
Space Zone District, the Golf Course comprises 41.8%, the Community Park
comprises 0.4% and the Common Open Space (General) comprises 31.5% of the
total PUD acreage. The land use summary on the PUD and within this document
delineates the overall land use and density proposed for the Rose Ranch PUD by
Planning Area.
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 2
• •
D. Zoning Districts
1. River Residential 1 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads;
Private Open Space Easements; open space; utility
and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 0.70 acres
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 175', except for lots which are narrower due to
added depth
Minimum lot depth:
175', except for lots which are more shallow
due to available depth between road and
wetland/boundary 30' from ordinary high
watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
40' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 30' for lots
less than 200' deep
50' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 25' for lots
less than 200' deep
30' for lots 200' minimum width; 25' for lots less than
200' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by
the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be established that are generally more
restrictive than those established by standard setbacks. These may
be the result of natural constraints on a lot. All building envelopes
shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 3
• •
2. River Residential 2 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads;
Private Open Space Easements; open space; utility
and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 0.50 acres
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 100'
Minimum lot depth: 175', except for lots which are more shallow
due to available depth between road and
wetland/boundary 30' from ordinary high
watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
35' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots
less than 175' deep
50' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots
less than 175' deep
30' for lots 150' minimum width; 20' for lots less than
150' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by
the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be established that are generally more
restrictive than those established by standard setbacks. These may
be the result of natural constraints on a lot. All building envelopes
shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 4
3. 20,000 Square Foot Residential Zone District
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Maximum building height:
Minimum lot width:
Minimum lot depth:
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads; open
space; and utility and drainage easements
20,000 square feet
35'
80', measured at front building line
150'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
Side/corner
30'
20'
10' or 1/2 height of principal building, whichever is
greater
20'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by
the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be established that are more restrictive
than those established by standard setbacks. These may be the
result of natural constraints on a lot. All building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
4. 15,000 Square Foot Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 5
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads; open
• •
Minimum lot size:
Minimum lot width:
Minimum lot depth:
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
space; and utility and drainage easements
15,000 square feet
80', measured at front building line
120'
Front
Rear
Side
Side/corner
30'
20'
10 or %2 height of principal building, whichever is
greater
20'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage
and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be established that are more restrictive
than those established by standard setbacks. These may be the
result of natural constraints on a lot. All building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
5. 9,000 Square foot Residential Zone District
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Minimum lot width:
Minimum lot depth:
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 6
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home office;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads; open
space; and utility and drainage easements
9,000 square feet
75', measured at front building line
90'
• •
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 25'
Rear 20'
Side 10'
Side/corner 15'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage
and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be established that are more restrictive
than those established by standard setbacks. These may be the
result of natural constraints on a lot. All building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
6. Duplex Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with two- family
attached residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; two-family residential
units; non -habitable accessory buildings and
structures; home office; sales/marketing center; time
share or fractional ownership units; public and private
roads; open space; and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size:
Duplex 8,000 square feet (2 units/double lot)
Single Family
Detached 8,000
Minimum (double) lot width: 75', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 90'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum setbacks:
Front
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 7
20'
• •
Rear 15'
Side/non-adjoining 10'
Side/corner 15'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage
and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be established that are more restrictive
than those established by standard setbacks. These may be the
result of natural constraints on a lot. All building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
7. Club Homes Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with single family
attached or detached residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; time-share or fractional
ownership units; public and private roads; open
space; trails; and utility and drainage easements;
community gardens
5,000 square feet for detached units; no minimum lots
size for attached units — common ownership of open
areas within this zone district is permitted
Maximum Gross Density: 6 dwelling units/acre
Minimum Gross Density: 4.5 dwelling units/acre
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 45' for detached units; no minimum lot width
for attached units
Minimum lot depth: 80' for detached units; no minimum lot depth
for attached units
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 8
• •
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 15' from street or driveway
Rear 15'
Side 0' with 15' minimum between primary sturctures,
excluding attached units
Side/corner 15'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential detached structure or 2 off street parking spaces
for attached residential structures; this requirement may be satisfied
by the garage and/or driveway.
8. Common Open Space Zone District
Intent: To provide a hierarchy of privately owned open
space, both developed and undeveloped.
a. Golf Course
Intent: To provide an opportunity for recreational golf.
Permitted Uses: Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse
facilities including but not limited to pro shop,
restaurant; lounge; driving range; golf related
activities; golf shelters; community greenhouse;
golf course maintenance and accessory
facilities; community facilities; homeowner's
association facilities; utilities; utilities access
Maximum structure height::
35' restricted to golf course clubhouse;
other structures limited to maximum
height of 25'
Maximum structure height (utilities)::
Minimum building setbacks:
35', restricted to water storage
tank; other structures limited to
maximum height of 25'
To County Road 109 30'
To any adjacent residential use 20'
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 9
• •
Other:
b. Golf Course II
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
c. Community Park
Golf course acreage will be finalized
during platting; golf course may be
parcelized / platted for ownership
purposes
To provide an opportunity for recreational golf.
To provide rental residential units
Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse
facilities including pro shop, restaurant,
lounge; driving range; golf related activities;
golf shelters; community greenhouse; golf
course maintenance and accessory facilities;
community facilities; daycare center;
homeowners association facilities; utilities;
utilities access; caretaker's residence and rental
residence units (10 maximum)
Intent: To provide an opportunity for recreational
activities for residents of Rose Ranch.
Permitted Uses:
Active recreation including but not limited to
tennis; swimming pool; volleyball; daycare
facilities; homeowners' association facilities; tot
lot; horseshoes; trails; open space; picnic
facilities; utilities
Maximum structure height:: 25'
Other: Ownership and maintenance will be under the
control of the HOA
d. Common Open Space (General)
Intent: To provide open areas for recreation, visual
relief; buffering and wildlife habitat
Permitted Uses: Useable open space, limited open space;
community gardens; community greenhouse;
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 10
• •
parking; trails; pedestrian linkages; golf cart
paths; ponds; overlooks; drainage and utility
easements; utilities; utilities access; public
fishing easement
Maximum structure height (utilities):
Other:
Rose Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 11
35', restricted to water storage
tank; other structures limited to
maximum height of 25'
It is anticipated that one community water
system storage facility will be built in the upper
valley, West of County Road 109. This facility
will be non-detectable from County Road 109
and accessible by means of a maintenance
access path.
• •
WordPerfect Document Compare Summary
Original document: E:\WP Docs\Donna\Tim\Rose Ranch\Rose Ranch Zoning Districts II
12.17.02.wpd
Revised document: E:\WP Docs\Donna\Tim\Rose Ranch\Iron Bridge Zoning Districts II revised
12.24.02.wpd
Deletions are shown with the following attributes and color:
Bold, Strikeout, (No color code).
Deleted text is shown as full text.
Insertions are shown with the following attributes and color:
Bold, Double Underline, (No color code).
The document was marked with 73 Deletions, 71 Insertions, 0 Moves.
• •
Land Use Summary
P.U.D.
1. RESIDENTIAL
PA1
PA2
PA3
PA4
PA5
PA6
PA7
PA8
PA9
PA10
PA11
PA12
PA13
PA14
PA15
PA16
PA17
PA18
PA19
PA20
PA21
Golf II
Figure 1
PUD Res.
MIN. LOT SIZE UNITS ACRES % OF TOTAL
15,000 S.F. 6 2.63
20,000 S.F. 9 5.5
River Res. 1 13 14.3
20,000 S.F. 8 4.15
15,000 S.F. 8 2.96
9,000 S.F. 14 5.62
9,000 S.F. 9 3.21
River Res. 1 8 6.31
River Res. 1 17 12.3
15,000 S.F. 4 1.42
9,000 S.F. 7 2.41
15,000 S.F. 6 2.16
15,000 S.F. 16 6.96
9,000 S.F. 2 0.45
20,1000 S.F. 10 6.3
15,000 S.F. 8 3.58
15,000 S.F. 18 7.55
15,000 S.F. 4 1.45
Duplex Lots 74 13.55
Club fiemesVillas 6747 11.19
9,000 S.F. 4 1.37
Clubhouse Apartments 10
SUBTOTAL: 3222921 115.88 21.7%
2. ROADS
SUBTOTAL:
ACRES % OF TOTAL
26.27 4.9%
3. COMMON OPEN SPACE ACRES % OF TOTAL
Community Park 2.14 0.4%
Golf Course 222.18224.32 4442.896
20
Community Open Space 167.0 31.5%
SUBTOTAL: 391.35 73.4%
TOTAL ACREAGE
GROSS DENSITY
COMMERCIAL USE
(MAXIMUM)
RESIDENTIAL DATA
0.60 DU/AC
25,000 SQUARE FEET
533.5 100.0%
PLANNING AREA MIN. LOT SIZE UNITS ACRES
PA 3, PA 8 _River Res. 1 21 21.2
PA 9 _River Res. 2 17 12.3
PA 2, PA 4, PA 15 -20,000 S.F.* 27 15.9
PA 1, PA 5, PA 10, PA 12 -15,00 S.FF*. 70 28.7
PA 13, PA 17, PA 18
PA 6, PA 7, PA 11, PA 14, PA 21 -9,000 S.FF*. 36 13.1
PA 19 Duplex Lots Medium Density Residential 7413.6
PA 20 Club IlomesVillas 6747 11.2
Golf Clubhouse Apartments 10 .PA 22
Medium Density
1. Unit total will be increased to 322 if all affordable dwelling units are located on site within Ironbridge PUD
*Allowed additional (20) units/affordable dwelling units
TOTAL:
Me Rtine YUU Loithig icat
age
1
Residentiall0 2.5
322302 115.88%88
• •
A. Applicability
To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zoning
Regulations, as amended, the Ironbridge Planned Unit Development
(PUD) Zone District is divided into the following zone district classifications:
• River Residential 1 Zone District
• (PA's 3 & 8)
• River Residential 2 Zone District
• (PA 9)
• 20,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 2, 4, & 15)
• 15,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 1, 5, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17 & 18)
• 9,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA 19)
• DuplexMedium Density Residential Zone District
(PA 19 & 22))
Club IlamesVillas Residential Zone District
(PA 20)
• Common Open Space Zone District
• Golf Course
• Golf II
• Community Park
• Common Open Space (General)
The PUD plan identifies
twenty-one (222) distinct Planning Areas (PA's) in which residential
development may occur. Totaling 15118.8834 acres, the residential development
will be confined to approximately 21.7% of the site. The remainder of the site is
designated for roadways (4.9%) and Common Open Space (73.4%). Within the
Common Open Space Zone District, the Golf Course comprises 41.8%, -the
and the Common Open Space (General)
comprises 31.5% of the total PUD acreage. The land use summary on the PUD
and within this document delineates the overall land use and density proposed
for the Rose Ranch PUD by Planning Area.
RsIronbridge Rnneh PUD Zoning Text
Page 4
II,
D. Zoning Districts
1.
Intent:
River Residential 1 Zone District
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Maximum building height:
Minimum lot width:
Minimum lot depth:
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads;
Private Open Space Easements; open space; utility
and drainage easements
0.70 acres
35'
175', except for lots which are narrower due to
added depth
175', except for lots which are more shallow
due to available depth between road and
wetland/boundary 30' from ordinary high
watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
40' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 30' for lots
less than 200' deep
50' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 25' for lots
less than 200' deep
30' for lots 200' minimum width; 25' for lots less than
200' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by
the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be
Roslronbridge-Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 5
1 •
finalized at time of subdivision.
2. River Residential 2 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures.
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; non -habitable
accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads;
Private Open Space Easements; open space; utility
and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 0.50 acres
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 100'
Minimum lot depth: 175', except for lots which are more shallow
due to available depth between road and
wetland/boundary 30' from ordinary high
watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
35' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots
less than 175' deep
50' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots
less than 175' deep
30' for lots 150' minimum width; 20' for lots less than
150' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by
the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
IZrislronbridge Ranh PUD Zoning Text
Page 6
• 1
3. 20,000 Square Foot Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures and affordable Accessory
Dwelling Units.
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; deed restricted
attached or detached Accessory Dwelling Units
complying with the requirements of the Garfield
County Zoning Regulations governing Affordable
Housing for Rent (Section 5.09.05.03 (3)(1999)); non -
habitable accessory buildings and structures; home
offices; sales/marketing center; public and private
roads; open space; and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 80', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 150'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 30'
Rear 20'
Side 10'
greaterSide/corner 20
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by
the garage and/or driveway.
Other:
The gross floor
area for residential use occupancy within any Accessory Dwelling
Unit shall not exceed 1500 sq. feet. Building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
ifeslronbridge Rr..1L/r PUD Zoning Text
Page 7
• •
4. 15,000 Square Foot Zone District
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures and affordable Accessory
Dwelling Units.
Single-family residential units; deed restricted
attached or detached Accessory Dwelling Units
complying with the requirements of the Garfield
County Zoning Regulations governing Affordable
Housing for Rent (Section 5.09.05.03 (3)(1999)); non -
habitable accessory buildings and structures; home
offices; sales/marketing center; public and private
roads; open space; and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 15,000 square feet
Minimum lot width: 80', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 120'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 30'
Rear 20'
Side 10
Side/corner 20'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage
and/or driveway.
Other:
The gross floor
area for residential use occupancy within any Accessory Dwelling
Unit shall not exceed 1500 sq. feet. Building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
5. 9,000 Square foot Residential Zone District
R Ironbridge-Rmreh PUD Zoning Text
Page 8
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
• •
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures and affordable Accessory
Dwelling Units.
Single-family residential units; deed restricted
attached or detached Accessory Dwelling Units
complying with the requirements of the Garfield
County Zoning Regulations governing Affordable
Housing for Rent (Section 5.09.05.03 (3)(1999)); non -
habitable accessory buildings and structures; home
office; sales/marketing center; public and private
roads; open space; and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 9,000 square feet
Minimum lot width: 75', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 90'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 25'
Rear 20'
Side 10'
Side/corner 15'
Parking: A minimum of 43 off street parking spaces must be provided for
each primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the
garage and/or driveway.
Other:
The gross floor
area for residential use occupancy within any Accessory Dwelling
Unit shall not exceed 1500 sq. feet. Building envelopes shall be
finalized at time of subdivision.
6. Medium Density Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with
attachedsingle family/multi-family residential
RasIronbridge-Rane/r PUD Zoning Text
Page 9
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Duplex
Single Family
Detached
structures
Single-family residential units; two-familymulti-
family residential units; attached and detached non -
habitable accessory buildings and structures; home
office; sales/marketing center; time share or fractional
ownership units; public and private roads; open
space; and utility and drainage easements
84,000 sgquares�c .. feet
8,000
75'for detached units; no minimum lot size for
Minimum (double) lot width:
attached units — common ownership of open
areas including parking areas within this
zone is permitted.
Minimum lot width (detached): 35', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth (detached): 90'50'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum setbacks from lot lines:
Single Family
Front
Rear
Side/corner 15'
Multi -Family
Front
Rear
Side
20'
15'
Side 5'
15' from street
15'
0' with 10' minimum between primary structures,
excluding attached units
Parking: A minimum of 4-aff-street2 parking spaces must be provided for
each primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the
Roslronbridge Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 10
driveway, on -street parking and/or common parking area.
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
7. Club Homes Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with single family
residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Single-family residential units attached or detached;
non -habitable accessory buildings and structures;
home offices; sales/marketing center; time-share or
fractional ownership units; public and private roads;
open space; trails; and utility and drainage easements;
community gardens
51,000 square feet for detached units; no minimum
lots size for attached units — common ownership of
open areas within this zone district is permitted
Maximum Gross Density: 68 dwelling units/acre
Minimum Gross Density: 4.50 dwelling units/acre
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 45=35' for detached units; no minimum lot
width for attached units
Minimum lot depth: 80'50' for detached units; no minimum lot
depth for attached units
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 15' from street
Rear 15'
Side 0' with 1-5110' minimum between primary
sturettrresstructures, excluding attached units
Side/corner 15'
Iteslronbridge Ranch PUD Zoning Text
Page 11
• •
Parking: A minimum of " of�vfff street2 parking spaces must be provided for
each primary structure
, this requirement may be
satisfied by the-garage_artd/orL driveway, on -street parking and/or
common parking area.
8. Common Open Space Zone District
Intent: To provide a hierarchy of privately owned open
space, both developed and undeveloped.
a. Golf Course
Intent: To provide an opportunity for recreational golf.
Permitted Uses: Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse
facilities including but not limited to pro shop,
restaurant; lounge; driving range; golf related
activities; golf shelters; community
golf course maintenance and
accessory facilities; eommunitr fareilitiestennis•
swimming
pool; volley ball; health/fitness center; utilities;
utilities access
Maximum structure height::
35' restricted to golf course clubhouse
and health/fitness center building;
other structures limited to maximum
height of 25'
Maximum structure height (utilities)::
Minimum building setbacks:
Other:
35', restricted to water storage
tank; other structures limited to
maximum height of 25'
To County Road 109 30'
To any adjacent residential use 20'
Roslronbridge Ranh PUD Zoning Text
Page 12
Golf course acreage will be finalized
during platting; golf course may be
parcelized / platted for ownership
1
b. Golf Course II
purposes
prov
pportunity
Permitted Uses: Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse
c. Community Park
P
pportunity
Permitted Uses: Active recreation including but not limited to
Maximum structure height:: 25'
P
db. Common Open Space (General)
r
Intent: To provide open areas for recreation, visual
relief; buffering and wildlife habitat
Permitted Uses:
Reslrortbridge-Raireh PUD Zoning Text
Page 13
Useable open space, limited open space;
community gardens; community greenhouse;
parking; trails; pedestrian linkages; golf cart
paths; ponds; overlooks; drainage and utility
easements; utilities; utilities access; public
fishing easement
• •
Maximum structure height (utilities):
Other:
Reslronbridge R1n,ePUD Zoning Text
Page 14
35', restricted to water storage
tank; other structures limited to
maximum height of 25'
It is anticipated that one community water
system storage facility will be built in the upper
valley, West of County Road 109. This facility
will be non-detectable from County Road 109
and accessible by means of a maintenance
access path.
IRONBRIDGE PUD DEVELOPMENT
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF PERIMETER BOUNDARY
Duane Ray Allbaugh
Joyce Louise Allbaugh
243 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Arthur C. Armijo
LaPriel McPherson Armijo
475 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Thomas S. Ball
Joyce D. Ball
702 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Steven M. Beattie
Sharon R. Beattie
74 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Richard W. Becvarik
Cynthia L. Becvarik
4802 County Road 113
Carbondale, CO 81623
Henry Birk
Ella Birk
243 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Walter F. Brannan as Trustee under that certain
amended & restated Brannan Family Trust
Agreement Dated April 29, 1982
180 County Road 109
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Marlin W. Brown
Patricia A. Brown
85 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
William Edward Alley
Nancy Corrin Alley
896 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Glenn M. Ault
Dorothy L. Ault
P.O. Box 127
Basalt, CO 81621
Richard D. Bass
4516 Lovers Lane, #283
Dallas, TX 75225
Mark B. Becker
Nancy L. Becker
316 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Michael A. Bennett
Janice E. Bennett
4939 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Milton E. Branine
Virginia L. Branine
396 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
James L. Brown
Shirley A. Brown
P.O. Box 457
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Roger J. Brown
Lorrie S. Brown
241 Dolores Circle
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 1 of 10
J. Robert Browning
Mary S. Browning
122 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Bureau of Land Management
P.O. Box 1009
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Paul Nelson Cain
Debbie L. Cain
1330 Barber Drive
Carbondale, CO 81601
Kirk E. Carlson
Lyndee K. Carlson
1154 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Milton E. Cass
Mary L. Moscon
644 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Ho Jin Chee
Carmen J. Chee
504 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
F.E. Collins
Virginia Collins
200 Ponderosa Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John W. Cooper
Constance M. Cooper
29 Oak Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John R. Crump
Elaine L. Crump
368 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Scott N. Bundy
Kirstin E. Bundy
P.O. Box 4082
Aspen, CO 81612
Edgar R. Burkland
Dianne M. Burkland
1091 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Alan J. Cappo
Cheri A. Cappo
252 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Jeffrey B. Carlson
Nancy J. Carlson
507 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert F. Chaffin
Joan Chaffin
P.O. Box 698
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Bill Collins
Josh Goodsell
6702 Highway 82
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Colorado Department of Transportation
202 Centennial
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Mark L. Courtney
20 Pine Street
Carbondale, CO 81623
Suzanne Dameron
383 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 2 of 10
Craig Dance
224 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Ernest C. Delto
Carol E. Delto
1599 County Road 109
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Double R Properties, LLC
100 Home Place
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dennis W. Drake
Terrie R. Drake
377 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Roger D. Duroux
Abbie L. Duroux
731 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Ehlen Family Trust
P.O. Box 3580
Winter Park, CO 80482
Timothy F. Fautsko
Marianne O'Carroll
29 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Jerel P. Ferguson
Linda S. Ferguson
DEA Justic American
APO
AE 09213
John Fit
Jozefa Fit
141 W. 6th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Deer Park Properties
13112 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Robert L. Deroeck
Glennyce R. Deroeck
1602 Lincolnwood Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert Bryson Dover
Meredith B. Kreske
4606 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Daniel D. Duroux
Susan F. Duroux
708 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Thomas P. Dykema
Joan E. Dykema
267 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Richard N. Eide
Nancy T. Eide
831 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Gary H. Fender
Linda L. Fender
416 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Kathryn L. Fisher, Trustee
P.O. Box 8000-252
Mesquite, NV 89024
Darrell R. Fitzwater
Eva Fitzwater
4792 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 3 of 10
Mary Lynn Fuller
575 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Natalie J. Gardner Trustee Under Trust
Declaration Dated 8/19/96
405 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Theodore R. Gaugler
Ellen J. Gaugler
Robert H. Gaugler
P.O. Box 71
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Glenwood Land Company, LLC
525 E. Cooper Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Stanley Goldman
Evelyn Goldman
763 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO
Mark C. Gould
Mary Ann Gould
41 Oak Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO
Edward E. Gantner
Lana Rae Gantner
279 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Herbert L. Gardner
Natalie J. Gardner
405 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Kathleen M. Gilmer
4698 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Golden Buff Enterprises
P.O. Box 2104
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Nicholas Goluba Jr.
June E. Goluba
485 County Road 167
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John S. Haines
Janet L. Haines
28 Fairway Lane
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
David E. Harris
Patricia D. Harris
4829 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Gary L. Heisel
Linda J. Heisel
187 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Richard John Hess
Gertrude Johanna Hess
194 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John W. Hazen II
Renee Dawn Hazen
1141 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert Rolland Hendee
Donna Lee Hendee
387 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert L. Hinkey Trust
532 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 4 of 10
Leonard D. Hodera
Sue A. Hodera
794 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Myles J. Holub
Virginia Holub
255 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Rudi Idzojtic
Susan E. Idzojtic
177 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Iron Mountain Condo Association
Suite C 1A Village Plz
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
J & M Investment Co.
Attn: George McGill
190 Del Mar Shores Ter., Apt. 75
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Ross D. Jeffrey
P.O. Box 1693
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Jack Katz as Trustee for Kristiana M. Katz
4501 SW 34th Street
Orlando, FL 32811
Douglas A. Kelch
Bronwyn F. Kelch
543 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Analee Kirkham
4602 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO
Sebrina J. Hoffmeister
439 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John Huebinger Jr.
Dolores J. Huebinger
235 Oak Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
William J. Inverso
409 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Ritsuo Itao
Rita M. Itao
359 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Joe Jammaron
Geraldine Rae Jammaron
P.O. Box 1631
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Ralph Tucker Jones
Marguerite Traut Jones
479 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Jack Katz as Trustee for Jack Katz II
4501 SW 34th Street
Orlando, FL 32811
Courtlandt Blaine Kirk
2459 Tremont Road
Columbus, OH 43221
KN Energy, Inc.
P.O. Box 670
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Edwin S. Kornasiewicz
Nelda L. Kornasiewicz
Edmund A. Kornasiewicz
89 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Ken Kriz
483 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 5 of 10
Kenneth J. Kulwiec
Elizabeth L. Kulwiec
352 Westbank Drive
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Michael LaMontagne
Bonnie Ralene LaMontagne
4412 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
David M. Leety
Rosella T. Leety
1070 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert J. Loewecke
14141 Southeast Fwy.
Sugar Land, TX 77478
Erik John Martin
Judith Ann Martin
570 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert A. Miller
Susan M. Laws
170 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO
Wayne Kurth
Lori S. Kurth
6766 Timbers Drive
Evergreen, CO 80439
Kenneth Larson
Monika Larson
P.O. Box 2462
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Richard D. Lincoln
Karen K. Lincoln
15357 Hwy. 145
Dolores, CO 81323
Maria E. Maniscalchi
5157 County Road 157
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
David S. McAllister
Joy Anne McAllister
676 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
J. Douglas Miller
Teresa J. Miller
303 N. Kansas Avenue, Apt. 201
81601 Liberal, KS 67901
D. Kjell Mitchell
Sandra L. Mitchell
215 Dolores Circle
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Lydia P. Morgan Trustee
of the Lydia P. Morgan Trust
114 Westbank Raod
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert D. Murray
Barbara J. Murray
1034 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO
Richard A. Nash
965 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO
Richard T. Moolick
5109 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Patricia Virginia Moss
4696 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
James M. Nadon
Ann K. Nadon
215 Meadow Lane
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Cora Lousise Natal
1098 Westbank Road
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 6 of 10
A.J. Nemoff
E.H. Nemoff
P.O. Box 11862
Aspen, CO 81612
John M. Nolle
Marie Nolle
30 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert T. O'Donnell
Marie C. O'Donnell
99 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO
Richard H. Neville
Diane Neville
105 Oak Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Richard Mark Norris
Donna R. Norris
161 Oak Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Orthopaedic Associates of Aspen & Glenwood
Springs, P.C. Retirement Funds,
FBO Robert S. Derkash
81601 622 19th Street, Ste. 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Bradley J. Osborn
Linda C.O. Osborn
8240 County Road 115, Apt. 4
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Chris Overacker
Christene M. Overacker
1855 County Road 109
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Linda S. Pineda
P.O. Box 278
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Rodney E. Poland
Donna M. Poland
1752 County Road 109
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
William E Prehm
Edmund A. Prehm
Isabelle Prehm
916 Bennett Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
PS Warden Family LLLP
125 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert C. Oswald
Mary Sinnott Oswald
585 E. 31st St.
Durango, CO 81301
Hayden Phillips
Mary Ann Phillips
298 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Lamar Podbevsek
Joan Podbevsek
1132 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John Praetorius
190 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Leo T. Prinster
L. Carolyn Prinster
P.O. Box 3527
Grand Jucntion, CO 81502
Ronald F. Radtke
Bonnie A Radtke
345 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 7 of 10
J. Steven Randol
Betty A. Randol
P.O. Box 2018
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
River Ridge Partners, LLP
P.O. Box 276
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Philip E. Robbins
P.O. Box 513
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
James L. Rose
P.O. Box 1240
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Rick D. Rossow
Melanie G. Rossow
25 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO
Richard W. Ryman
Cynthia Jane Ryman
4728 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO
Hayes Karal Schlundt
497 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO
Gregory R. Richards
Gale R. Richards
2208 Bookcliff Avenue
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority
P.O. Box 1270
Carbondale, CO 81623
Brook J. Robison
Marilynn M. Robison
931 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
James L. Rose
P.O. Box 432
Rifle, CO 81650
Fred M. Rowland
Velma F. Rowland
150 Oak Lane
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Sandro Sabbatini
Thelma Sabbatini
515 County Road 167
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Shane & Bruce's Ltd. Liability Co.
170 Piedmont Road
81601 Glenwood Springs, CO
Peter K. Sharpe
Sue K. Sharpe
283 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Charles C. Smith
Barbara A. Smith
1949 Wallenberg Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80526
Ronald K. Sobieck
Jean L Sobieck
102 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
81601
Michael Shobe
795 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Royal A. Smith
Deborah A. Smith
29 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Robert H. Spuhler
Jacilyn E. Spuhler
224 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 8 of 10
Jamie St. Ives
P.O. Box 1333
Carbondale, CO 81623
Walter A. Stowe
M. Karen Stowe
P.O. Box 276
Glenwood Springs, CO
William E. Steele
Viola M. Steele
P.O. Box 1507
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Kenneth A. Strong
Laura M. Strong
366 Mountain Shadow Drive
81602 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Shannon P. Sweeney
Pamela M. Sweeney
427 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Michael A. Sylvia
Therese A. Sylvia
131 Fairway Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Teller Springs Homeowners Association
720 E. Durant Avenue
Aspen, CO 81611
Theoro, Inc.
P.O. Box 2261
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Suzanne Titus
P.O. Box 31
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Glenn Bartyn Victor II
607 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phil K. Walter
Joan L. Walter
139 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Richard B. Weinberg
Suzanne B. Weinberg
86 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Jack L. Sylman
Jennifer L. Sylman
14459 W. Exposition Drive
Lakewood, CO 80228
Cheryl Lynn Tassos
183 County Road 167
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John R. Tesmer
Dorris F. Tesmer
286 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Steven G. Thompson
Barbara M. Thompson
P.O. Box 1871
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Roger R. Trout
880 Nile Street
Aurora, CO 80010
Rodney D. Vogt
Gladys M. Vogt
1857 County Road 109
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Richard G. Waltsak
4843 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Westbank Ranch #1 Ltd.
235 Oak Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 9 of 10
Westbank Mesa Homeowners Association, Inc.
199 Dolores Circle
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Helen O. Wheeler Revocable Trust
262 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Edna H. White
88 Meadow Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Roger Willbanks
P.O. Box 5793
Denver, CO 80217
Kenneth G. Woods
Jacquelynn H. Woods
1111 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Warren L. Wright
Ada B. Wright
203 Westbank Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Westbank Homeowners Association
P.O. Box 2703
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
George I. White
Linda K. White
4812 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Kurt J. Wigger
Elsbeth R. Wigger
P.O. Box 1985
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
John E. Wood
Jean O. Wood
P.O. Box 1096
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Kenneth G. Woods
Jacquelynn H. Woods
Attn: GMAC Mortgage Corporation of PA
8360 Old York Road
Elkins Park, PA 19027
Robert J. Young
Beatrice E. Young
311 Coryell Ridge Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
IronBridge PUD Development Neighboring Property Owners Page 10 of 10
z
0
ri,
ul
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 lan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 1 of 20
Date: 01-14-2003
Property Address:
BALCOMB & GREEN
PO DRAWER 790
818 COLORADO AVE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
A ttn: TIM THULSON
Phone: 970-945-6546
Fax: 970-945-9769
Copies: 1
Sent Via US Postal Service
Fan
Land Title C arantee Q Bunn xuiy
CUSTOMER asrw
Our Order Number: GW240393
1601
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
Page 2 of 20
Land Title Guarantee arrpany
YOUR OC HT/ CTS
Date: 01-14-2003
Our Order Number: GW240393
Property Address:
Buyer/Borrower:
TBD
Seller/Owner:
LB ROSE RANCH LLC, A DELAWARE LIMTI'FD LIABILITY COMPANY
If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below:
For Closing Assistance: For Title Assistance:
Glenwood Springs "GW" Unit
1317 GRAND AVE #200
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO
Phone: 970-945-2610
Fax: 970-945-4784
Need a 'nap or directions for your upcoming closing? Check out Land Title's web site at www.ltgc.com
for directions to any of our 40 office locations.
ESTI MATEOFT1TUE FEES
TBD Coininihnent $184 . 00
TOTAL
$184.00
Form CONTACT
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER!
From Land title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 3 of 20
• •
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
ALTA COMMITMENT
Our Order No. GW240393
Schedule A Cust. Ref.:
Property Address:
l . Effective Date: December 27, 2002 at 5:00 P. M.
2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured:
"TBD" Coin nitrent
Proposed Insured:
TBD
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
LB ROSE RANCH LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 4 of 20
LirAL DESCI1 PTl (N
PARCEL A
Our Order No. GW240393
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24,
28, 29, 30, AND 34 OF SECTION 1 AND LOTS 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16 OF
SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1, A 1958 BLM BRASS CAP IN
PLACE;
THENCE S 56 DEGREES 22'41" E 518.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 590 AT PAGE 955 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK
A ND RECORDER'S OFFICE, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 59 DEGREES 20'23" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 590 AT PAGE
955, A DISTANCE OF 208.21 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE S 63 DEGREES 47'19" E 60.78 FEET TO
A REBAR AND CAP L. S. #17488 IN PLACE;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE S 63 DEGREES 47'23" E 334.00 FEET
TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #17488 IN PLACE;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE S 63 DEGREES 47'20" E 334.00 PEET
TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BOOK 590 AT PAGE 955, A REBAR AND CAP L.S.
#17488 IN PLACE;
THENCE N 37 DEGREES 11'37" E ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 590 AT PAGE
955, 298.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIVER
1. S 64 DEGREES 20'33" E 539.13 FEET
2. S 69 DEGREES 24'54" E 523.30 FEET
3. S 61 DEGREES 41'54" E 147.51 FEET
4. S 34 DEGREES 19'54" E 646.80 FEET
5. S 29 DEGREES 54'54" E 516.97 P'EET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 17
OF SAID SECTION 1;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE S 00 DEGREES 42'38" E ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
LOTS 17, 22 AND 29 A DISTANCE OF 2140.70 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE N 89 DEGREES 15'45" E 43.14 PEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 511 AT PAGE 103 OF THE
GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PROPERTY:
1. S 41 DEGREES 07'10" E 559.76 FEET
2. S 47 DEGREES 56'39" E 519.80 FEET
3. 5 47 DEGREES 16'43" E 466.70 FEET
4. S 34 DEGREES 28'09" E 123.72 FEET
5. S 04 DEGREES 45'38" E 390.41 FEET
6. S 08 DEGREES 01'51" W 130.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY;
THENCE N 67 DEGREES 25'06" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY 211.00
FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 9 OF SAID SECTION 12;
THENCE S 00 DEGREES 22'11" E ALONG SAID EASIERLY LINE 606.90 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, A REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAP, LS # 22580, IN
PLACE;
THENCE S 03 DEGREES 11' 58" W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 12 OF SAID SECTION
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 5 of 20
• •
Our Order No. GW240393
L .DESCI1 PTI CN
12, 741.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 12, A REBAR AND ALUMINUM
CAP IN PLACE;
THENCE S 00 DEGREES 06'02" E ALONG THE EAS I'ERLY LINE OF LOT 16 OF SAID SECTION
12, 555.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16, A REBAR AND ALUMINUM
CAP IN PLACE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TELLER SPRINGS
SUBDIVLSION;
THENCE S 89 DEGREES 59'08" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TELLER SPRINGS
SUBDIVISION 220.61 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL C OF RECEPTION NO.
444311 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE N 12 DEGREES 57'48" W ALONG THE EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID RECEPTION NO. 444311, 169.14 FEET;
THENCE N 87 DEGREES 58'25" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL C 324.74
P'EET;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL C ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE
RIGHT HAVINGA RADIUS OF 582.29 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 52'51",
A DISTANCE OF 181.72 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 13 DEGREES 29'05" E 180.98 FEET) TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TELLER SPRINGS SUBDIVISION;
THENCE S 89 DEGREES 52'26" W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 174.01 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE TELLER SPRINGS OPEN SPACE;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE S 21 DEGREES 55'10" W ALONG THE WESTERLY
LINE OF SAID OPEN SPACE 53.97 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 OF SAID
FELLER SPRINGS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN ON THE AMENDED PLAT THEREOF;
THENCE S 89 DEGREES 59'08" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5, 165.35
FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE N 45 DEGREES 01'42" W 28.27 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE N 89 DEGREES 59'08" W 855.53 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 109;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY-THREE (23) COURSES ALONG SAID EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY:
1. N 13 DEGREES 15'08" E 30.84 FEET
2. N 13 DEGREES 40'41" E 86.97 FEET
3. N 14 DEGREES 26'34" E 8.37 FEET
4. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 263.67 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 DEGREES 42'13", A DISTANCE OF 104.48 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 03
DEGREES 05'28" E 103.80 FEET)
5. N 08 DEGREES 15'39" W 721.97 PEET
6. N 09 DEGREES 17'30" W 215.26 FEET
7. N 09 DEGREES 32' 11" W 716.14 FEET
8. N 09 DEGREES 24'35" W 1739.93 PEET
9. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1870.00 1+'EET ANI) A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05 DEGREES 38'57", A DISTANCE OF 184.38 P'EET (CHORD BEARS N 06
DEGREES 35'06" W 184.30 FEET)
10. N 03 DEGREES 45'38" W 70.62 P'EET
11. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1155.00 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08 DEGREES 59'23", A DLSTANCE OF 181.22 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 08
DEGREES 15'19" W 181. 03 FEET)
12. N 12 DEGREES 45'01" W 250.30 PEET
13. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 518.09 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35 DEGREES 11'37", A DISTANCE OF 318.23 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 6 of 20
Our Order No. GW240393
LEGAL DESCRI PTl CN
30 DEGREES 20'49" W 313.26 FEET)
14. N 47 DEGREES 56'38" W 239.80 FEET
15. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1520.00 rEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEGREES 05'17", A DISTANCE OF 373.74 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 40
DEGREES 53'59" W 372.80 I'EET)16. N 33 DEGREES 51'20" W 485.97 FLET
17. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 620.00 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEGREES 38'05", A DISTANCE OF 212.47 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 43
DEGREES 40'23" W 211.43 FEET)
18. N 53 DEGREES 29'25" W 511.09 FEET
19. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 470.00 NEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34 DEGREES 45'42", A DISTANCE OF 285.15 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 36
DEGREES 06'34" W 280.80 FEET)
20. N 18 DEGREES 43'43" W 773.97 FEET
21. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 620.00 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30 DEGREES 05' 19", A DISTANCE OF 325.59 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 03
DEGREES 41' 04" W 321.86 FEET)
22. N 11 DEGREES 21'36" E 171.27 FEET
23. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET, A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 DEGREES 00'46" AND A DISTANCE OF 13.35 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
10 DEGREES 21'13" E 13.35 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIVER RIDGE
P. U.D.;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 19 DEGREES 24'30" E ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE 83.25 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE S 65 DEGREES 25'04" E 20.16 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL B
TOGETHER WITH A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 23 AND 28 OF SECTION 1 AND LOTS
4, 5, 6, 7, 14, THE NW1/4NW1/4 AND THE SW114NW1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7
SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD,
STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1, A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE,
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 88 DEGREES 08'24" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NW1/4NW1/4 AND LOT
5 OF SAID SECTION 12, 1925.15 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE S 01 DEGREES 19'06" W 100.00 FEET;
THENCE S 88 DEGREES 08'24" E 150.00 FEET;
THENCE N 00 DEGREES 03'38" E 200.10 FEET;
THENCE N 88 DEGREES 08'24" W 100.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT
28 OF SAID SECTION 1;
THENCE N 01 DEGREES 16'57" W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 28 AND 23 OF SAID
SECTION 1, 1061.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY ROAD
109;
THENCE LEAVING THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 23 THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES
ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID COUNTY ROAD 109:
1. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 458.09 r'ELT AND
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36 DEGREES 07'56", A DISTANCE OF 288.88 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 30
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 7 of 20
Our Order No. GW240393
LCL DESUI Pll CN
DEGREES 48'59" E 284.12 FEET)
2. S 12 DEGREES 45'01" E 247.15 FEET
3. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1095.00 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08 DEGREES 59'23", A DISTANCE OF 171.80 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 08
DEGREES 15'19" E 171.63 FEET)
4. S 03 DEGREES 45'38" E 70.62 FEET
5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1930.00 FEET AND A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05 DEGREES 38'57", A DLSTANCE OF 190.29 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 06
DEGREES 35'06" E 190. 21 FEET)
6. S 09 DEGREES 24'35" E 1739.96 BEET
7. S 09 DEGREES 32'11" E 545.09 FEET (TO A POINT WHENCE AN ONE INCH IRON PIPE
BEARS S 80 DEGREES 39'46" W 15.01 FEET)
THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY S 80 DEGREES 39'46" W ALONG THE
NORTHERLY LINE EXTENDED AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RECEPTION NO. 402764, 156.56
N'EE1 TO AN ONE INCH IRON PIPE IN PLACE;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE S 46 DEGREES 49'46" W 319.59 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID RECEPTION NO. 402764, A REBAR AND CAP IN
PLACE;
THENCE S 08 DEGREES 30'14" E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID RECEPTION NO.
402764 AND RECEPTION NO. 418590, 302.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
RECEIPTION NO. 418590;
THENCE S 80 DEGREES 45'44" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RECEPTION NO. 397182,
177.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID RECEPTION NO. 397182;
THENCE S 17 DEGREES 25' 15" W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF RECEPTION NO. 397182
AND RECEPTION NO. 411767, 741.91 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 21 OF SAID
SECTION 12, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TELLER SPRINGS SUBDIVISION;
THENCE S 00 DEGREES 00'34" W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TELLER SPRINGS
SUBDIVISION AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 14 OF SAID SECTION 12, 768.25 FEET TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14;
THENCE LEAVING THE WESTERLY LINE OF TELLER SPRINGS SUBDIVISION S 89 DEGREES
00'59" W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14, 468.99 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID LOT 14;
THENCE N 00 DEGREES 22'13" E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14, 1378.08
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT' 14;
THENCE N 89 DEGREES 07'53" W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SW1/4NWU4 OF SAID
SECTION 12, 1347.91 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12, AN
ALUMINUM CAP IN PLACE;
TI-IENCE N 00 DEGREES 33'14" W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 12,
2728.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL C
TOGETHER WITH A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89
WEST AND SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST, ALL IN THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID 'TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE COMMON CORNER OF SECTIONS 1 AND 2, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89
WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING COMMON TO SECTIONS
35 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 8 of 20
• •
Our Order No. GW240393
LMAL [)ESCRI PT1 CN
THENCE N 76 DEGREES 04'29" W 4185.64 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 21,
WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION, FILING 1, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY FIVE (25) COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EAS 1ERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID WESTBANK RANCH, FILING 1:
1. S 09 DEGREES 00'22" W 226.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
2. S 69 DEGREES 53'22" W 82.00 FEET TOA REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
3. S 06 DEGREES 59'38" E 79.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
4. S 55 DEGREES 29'38" E 95.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
5. S 75 DEGREES 13'38" E 215.00 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
6. N 88 DEGREES 58'22" E 451.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
7. N 82 DEGREES 55'22" E 240.00 FEET TO A :REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
8. S 20 DEGREES 35'18" E 185.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
9. N 69 DEGREES 24'42" E 210.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
10. N 07 DEGREES 18'26" W 251.73 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
11. N 71 DEGREES 15'22" E 272.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
12. N 41 DEGREES 00'22" E 372.54 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
13. S 65 DEGREES 59'38" E 435.00 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
14. S 19 DEGREES 59'38" E 210.00 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
15. S 60 DEGREES 00'22" W 398.80 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
16. S 48 DEGREES 16'51" W 235.20 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
17. S 50 DEGREES 30'22" W 210.22 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
18. S 69 DEGREES 24'42" W 180.00 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
19. N 20 DEGREES 35' 18" W 260.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
20. S 69 DEGREES 24'42" W 230.27 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
21. S 20 DEGREES 35' 18" E 266.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
22. S 66 DEGREES 09'07" W 96.57 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
23. S 01 DEGREES 23'54" W 109.60 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 7168
24. S 28 DEGREES 05'38" E 250.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
25. S 67 DEGREES 07'27" E 149.99 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE), THE COMMON
CORNER OF WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION FILING 1 AND THE WESTBANK RANCH
SUBDIVISION FILING 2, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 23 OF
SAID FILING 2;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING SEVEN PEEN (17) COURSES ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION FILING 2:
1. S 69 DEGREES 05'38" E 633.53 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
2. N 78 DEGREES 31'22" E 318.16 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
3. S 62 DEGREES 19'08" E 376.50 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
4. S 84 DEGREES 58'08" E 192.70 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 585.00 FEET, A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 55'13" AND A DISTANCE OF 40.03 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
03 DEGREES 04'17" E 40.02 FEET) TO A NO. 5 REBAR
6. N 84 DEGREES 58'08" W 183.32 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
7. N 62 DEGREES 19'08" W 133.53 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
8. N 10 DEGREES 46'22" E 65.11 FEET TO A 1 INCH S PEEL PIPE
9. N 30 DEGREES 36'38" W 476.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L. S. NO. 9184
10. N 39 DEGREES 08'22" E 306.48 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
11. N 77 DEGREES 24'22" E 264.88 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
12. S 33 DEGREES 46'38" E 544.01 FEET
13. S 18 DEGREES 29'38" E 217.00 N'EET
14. S 06 DEGREES 49'38" E 218.79 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
Page 9 of 20
Our Order No. GW240393
LEGAL DBI P11 CN
15. N 84 DEGREES 58'08" W 259.29 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
16. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 645.00 FEET, A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 33'20" AND A DISTANCE OF 40.03 FEET (CHORD BEARS S
03 DEGREES 15'14" W 40.02 FEET) TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
17. S 84 DEGREES 58'08" E 334.45 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR, THE COMMON CORNER OF
WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION FILING 2 AND WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION FILING 3,
SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14 OF SAID FILING 3;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIXTHEEN (16) COURSES ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SA II )
WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION FILING 3:
1. N 81 DEGREES 07'37" E 357.91 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L. S. NO. 9184
2. N 89 DEGREES 54'22" E 200.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 19598
3. S 78 DEGREES 32'08" E 216.49 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
4. S 74 DEGREES 29'38" E 173.39 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
5. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET, A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 DEGREES 56'03" AND A DISTANCE OF 52.02 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
00 DEGREES 36'54" E 51.95 FEET) TO A REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAP, L.S. NO. 11204
6. N 74 DEGREES 29'38" W 319.84 FEET TO A REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAP, L.S. NO.
11204
7. N 33 DEGREES 34'38" W 232.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
8. N 22 DEGREES 2738" W 382.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 9184
9. N 20 DEGREES 22'38" W 328.18 FEET TO A NO. 5 REBAR
10. N 35 DEGREES 29'38" W 119.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 9184
11. N 52 DEGREES 29'38" W 175.00 FEET TOA REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 9184
12. N 52 DEGREES 29'38" W 215.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L. S. NO. 9184
13. N 16 DEGREES 18'38" W 321.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
14. N 33 DEGREES 56'22" E 228.90 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 9184
15. S 69 DEGREES 27'38" E 475.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 9184
16. S 50 DEGREES 45'38" E 395.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP, L.S. NO. 9184, SAID
POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT' 23 OF SAID WESTBANK RANCH
SUBDIVISION FILING 3;
THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY N 42 DEGREES 04'22" E 160.00 PEET TO A POINT IN
THE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER;
THENCE THE TWELVE (12) FOLLOWING COURSES ALONG SAID CENTERLINE:
1. N 51 DEGREES 47'38" W 124.10 FEET
2. N 45 DEGREES 56'38" W 239.80 FEET
3. N 64 DEGREES 3738" W 507.80 FEET
4. N 84 DEGREES 51'38" W 169.60 FEET
5. N 79 DEGREES 36'38" W 203.00 FEET
6. N 72 DEGREES 34'38" W 879.00 FEET
7. S 87 DEGREES 46'22" W 342.00 FEET
8. S 85 DEGREES 12'22" W 231.00 FEET
9. S 65 DEGREES 57'22" W 517.00 FEET
10. S 48 DEGREES 42'22" W 332.00 DEET
11. S 69 DEGREES 44'22" W 363.00 FEET
12. N 80 DEGREES 02'30" W 181.97 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL D
TOGETHER WITH A 30.00 FOOT WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXTENDING FROM
MEADOW LANE TO COUNTY ROAD NO. 109 AND BEING THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF LOT
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 10 of 20
Our Order No. GW240393
L AI.- DESCR P11 CN
15, WESTBANK SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 3, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED
IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE.
PARCEL E
TOGETHER WITH A TEMPORARY NONEXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH WEST BANK OPEN
SPACE BEING A 50.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN LOT 24, SECTION 1,
'TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF
GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING 25.00 FEET TO EACH SIDE
OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1, A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE;
THENCE N 61 DEGREES 13'24" E 2223.28 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 24, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON SAID CEN I'ERLINE, THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE N 48 DEGREES 52'57" W ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
236. 91 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1404.75 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 55'42", A
DISTANCE OF 267.94 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 43 DEGREES 25'05" W 267.53 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE N 69 DEGREES 16'39" E 20.95 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 109;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 69
DEGREES 16'39" W 30.18 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42 DEGREES 43'58", A
DISTANCE OF 18.65 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 89 DEGREES 21'22" W 18.22 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE N 67 DEGREES 59'23" W 56.79 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 N'EET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 64 DEGREES 44'47", A
DLSTANCE OF 28.25 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 79 DEGREES 38'13" W 26.77 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 47 DEGREES 15'50" W 58.23 NEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05 DEGREES 28'45", A
DISTANCE OF 119.54 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 44 DEGREES 31'27" W 119.49 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 41 DEGREES 47'05" W 96.44 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEGREES 48'32", A
DISTANCE OF 32.83 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 51 DEGREES 11'21" W 32.68 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 60 DEGREES 35'37" W 46.99 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 49'45", A
DISTANCE OF 29.37 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 69 DEGREES 00'29" W 29.27 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 77 DEGREES 25'22" W 39.30 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CEN 1'RAL ANGLE OF 33 DEGREES 15'59", A
DLSTANCE OF 14.52 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 60 DEGREES 47'22" W 14.31 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 44 DEGREES 09'23" W 33.76 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CEN TRAL ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 35'03", A
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 11 of 20
•
Our Order No. GW240393
LIEGAL DESCRI PTI CN
DISTANCE OF 25.82 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 29 DEGREES 21'52" W 25.53 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 14 DEGREES 34'20" W 21.94 1+EET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CEN IRA L ANGLE OF 25 DEGREES 18'20", A
DISTANCE OF 22.08 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 01 DEGREES 55'10" W 21.90 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 10 DEGREES 44'00" E 127.50 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CEN I'RAL ANGLE OF 71 DEGREES 09'00", A
DISTANCE OF 31.05 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 24 DEGREES 50'30" W 29.09 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 60 DEGREES 25'00" W 83.15 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CEN ORAL ANGLE OF 68 DEGREES 29'58", A
DISTANCE OF 29.89 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 26 DEGREES 10'01" W 28.14 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 08 DEGREES 04'58" E 10.67 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 24 OF SAID SECTION 1, THE TERMINUS;
WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 BEARS S 50 DEGREES 30'32" W
1335.39 FEET.
PARCEL F
TOGETHER WITH A LIMITED ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH ROGER TROUT PROPERTY BEING A
40.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN LOT 26 AND 27, SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 7
SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE
OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING 20.00 FEET TO EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1, A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE;
THENCE N 50 DEGREES 30'32" E 1335.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 26, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON SAID CENTERLINE, THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE S 08 DEGREES 04'58" W ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
38.58 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79 DEGREES 39'45", A
DISTANCE OF 34.76 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 31 DEGREES 44'55" W 32.03 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 71 DEGREES 34'47" W 11.95 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CEN I'RAL ANGLE OF 21 DEGREES 47'02", A
DISTANCE OF 19.01 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 82 DEGREES 28'18" W 18.90 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE N 81 DEGREES 44'27" W 16.83 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CEN URAL ANGLE OF 95 DEGREES 09'44", A
DISTANCE OF 41.52 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 50 DEGREES 40'40" W 36.91 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 01 DEGREES 01'23" W 29.68 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CEN IRAL ANGLE OF 31 DEGREES 40'51", A
DISTANCE OF 27.65 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 16 DEGREES 51'49" W 27.30 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 32 DEGREES 42' 14" W 88.36 rEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 01'54", A
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 12 of 20
LCL DESal FT1�
Our Order No. GW240393
I)(STANCE OF 22.72 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 19 DEGREES 41'17" W 22.52 FEET);
:HENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 06 DEGREES 40'20" W 19.05 PEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60 DEGREES 30'09", A
DISTANCE OF 26.40 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 23 DEGREES 34'44" E 25.19 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 53 DEGREES 49'49" E 8.59 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CEN I'RAL ANGLE OF 28 DEGREES 56'52", A
DISTANCE OF 12.63 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 39 DEGREES 21'22" E 12.50 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 24 DEGREES 52'56" E 10.28 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CEN I'ERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42 DEGREES 02'11", A
DISTANCE OF 18.34 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 03 DEGREES 51'51" E 17.93 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 17 DEGREES 09'15" W 46.43 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 32'50", A
DISTANCE OF 18.41 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 22 DEGREES 25'40" W 18.38 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 27 DEGREES 42'05" W 49.78 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46 DEGREES 09'03", A
DISTANCE OF 40.27 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 04 DEGREES 3T33" W 39.19 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 18 DEGREES 26'59" E 9.34 P'EET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41 DEGREES 51'43", A
DISTANCE OF 36.53 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 02 DEGREES 28'53" W 35.72 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 23 DEGREES 24'44" W 52.26 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENIRAL ANGLE OF 39 DEGREES 55'48", A
DISTANCE OF 34.85 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 03 DEGREES 26'50" W 34.14 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 16 DEGREES 31'04" E 8.35 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48 DEGREES 53'14", A
DISTANCE OF 42.66 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 07 DEGREES 55'33" W 41.38 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 32 DEGREES 22'11" W 27.64 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 24'43", A
DISTANCE OF 23.05 FELT (CHORD BEARS S 19 DEGREES 09'49" W 22.85 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 05 DEGREES 57'27" W 107.09 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05 DEGREES 31'35", A
DISTANCE OF 9.65 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 03 DEGREES 11'40" W 9.64 FEET);
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S 00 DEGREES 25'52" W 48.93 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 DEGREES 55'00", A
DISTANCE OF 17.31 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 05 DEGREES 23'22" W 17.29 FEET) TO A
POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 26 OF SAID SECTION 1, THE I'ERiVIINUS; WHENCE
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 BEARS N 88 DEGREES 08'24" W 801.05 FEET.
From Land Title Guarantee
•
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 13 of 20
PARCEL G
LOT 15
WESTBANK SUBDIVISION
FILING NO. 3
COUNTY OF GARFIELI),
STATE OF COLORADO
Lir-ALDESCI1 FT1cN
Our Order No. GW240393
Amsimumml
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 14 of 20
•
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-1
(Requirements)
The Following are the requirements to be complied with:
Our Order No. GW240393
Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be
insured.
Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit:
TFIIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 15 of 20
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)
Our Order No. GW240393
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
t. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and
inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, unposed by law and
not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, lien, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for
value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment
6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office.
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land.
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
9. DEED OF TRUST DATED .JULY 29, 1997 FROM ROARING FORK INVESTMENTS, LLC TO THE
PUBLIC TRUSTEE. OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS,
INC., DOING BUSINESS AS LEHMAN CAPITAL, A DIVISION OF LEHMAN BROTHERS
HOLDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $3,150,000.00,
AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED AUGUST 04,
1997, IN BOOK 1028 AT PAGE 776.
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
DECEMBER 23, 1997, IN BOOK 1047 AT PAGE 569.
10. FINANCING STATEMENT WITH LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., THE SECURED PARTY,
RECORDED AUGUST 04, 1997, IN BOOK 1028 AT PAGE 846.
11. FINANCING STATEMENT WITH LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., THE SECURED PARTY,
RECORDED APRIL 20, 1998, IN BOOK 1063 AT PAGE 588.
12. DEED OF TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 27, 1997 FROM ROARING FORK INVESTMENTS, LLC TO
THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF LEHMAN BROTHERS
HOLDINGS, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS LEHMAN CAPITAL, A DIVISION OF LEHMAN
BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 16 of 20
• •
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)
Our Order No. GW240393
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
$1,030,487.50, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF,
RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1997, IN BOOK 1044 AT PAGE 30.
13. FINANCING STATEMENT WITH LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., THE SECURED PARTY,
RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1997, IN BOOK 1044 AT PAGE 62.
14. DEED OF TRUST DATED APRIL 29, 1999 FROM ROARING FORK INVESTMENTS, LLC TO
TI -IE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF LEHMAN BROTHERS
HOLDINGS, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS LEHMAN CAPITAL, A DIVISION OF LEHMAN
BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF
$13,308,337.50, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF,
RECORDED APRIL 30, 1999, IN BOOK 1127 AT PAGE 364.
15. FINANCING STATEMENT WITH LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., THE SECURED PARTY,
RECORDED APRIL 30, 1999, IN BOOK 1127 AT PAGE 404.
16. RESERVATIONS AS CONTAINED IN PATENT RECORDED JUNE 3, 1953 IN BOOK 269 AT
PAGE 307.
17. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 09, 1979 IN
BOOK 521 AT PAGE 468.
18. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 12, 1997 IN
BOOK 1029 AT PAGE 729.
19. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-80 RECORDED SEPTEMBER
09, 1998 IN BOOK 1087 AT PAGE 862.
20. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 07, 1998 IN
BOOK 1102 AT PAGE 643.
21. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 99-067 RECORDED JUNE 08,
1999 IN BOOK 1133 AT PAGE 911.
22. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 99-068 RECORDED .JUNE 08,
From Land Title Guarantee
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST Page 17 ofi 20
•
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)
Our Order No. GW240393
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
1999 IN BOOK 1133 AT PAGE 922.
23. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN MINERAL DEED RECORDED MAY
15, 1964 IN BOOK 358 AT PAGE 63.
24. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AS CONTAINED IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 18, 1971 IN BOOK 420 AT PAGE 88.
25. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION RECORDED JULY 11,
2000 IN BOOK 1196 AT PAGE 856.
26. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SECOND EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAN
RECORDED JULY 11, 2000 IN BOOK 1196 AT PAGE 869.
27. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 11, 2000, IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 629 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT
RECORDED SEP IEMBER 11, 2000, IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 637, AND AMENDED IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 2000 IN BOOK 1217 AT PAGE 266, AND
AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 20, 2002 IN BOOK 1330 AT PAGE 418
AND AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 1, 2002 IN BOOK 1333 AT PAGE
855..
28. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF PRE -INCLUSION AGREEMENT RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 640.
29. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR,
RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND
ONLY TO THE EX TENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42,
SECTION 3607 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES
NOT DISCREVIINA FE AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 2000, IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 662.
30. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION OF GOLF FACILITIES RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 734.
From Land Title Guarantee
1
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 18 of 20
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B-2
(Exceptions)
Our Order .No. GW240393
The policy or policies to he issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
31. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 748.
32. PERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT RECORDED
SEP I EMBER 11, 2000 IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 768.
33. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED
SEP 1'EMBER 11, 2000 IN BOOK 1206 AT PAGE 780.
34. PERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF LETTER RECORDED OCTOBER 04, 2000 IN
BOOK 1210 AT PAGE 883.
35. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ASSIGNMENT OF SUBDIVISION RIGHTS AND
APPROVALS RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2000 IN BOOK 1221 AT PAGE 745.
36. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 17, 2002 IN
BOOK 1396 AT PAGE 980.
37. PERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY GRANT RECORDED NOVEMBER
25, 2002 IN BOOK 1410 AT PAGE 781.
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
i
Page 19 of 20
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.
B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from
the Board of County Cornmissionets, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing
in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom
margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that
does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to docurnents using forms
on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every
title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the tune of recording
whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal
documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee
Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the
legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title
Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanics lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be
issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which
includes a condominium or townhouse unit.
B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of
construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against mrfiled
mechanic's and material -men's liens.
D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage
for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information
as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premiunn fully
executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements
as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured
has contracted for or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party
holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission
This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instnnnent
exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2.
Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages
referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied.
Form DISCLOSURE 9/02/ ver 4.0
From Land Title Guarantee
•
Tue 14 Jan 2003 10:37:19 AM MST
•
Page 20 of 20
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
OF
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY AND LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Title V of the Gramm -Leach -Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly
or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a
nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies
and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of
persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing
you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Land Title
Guarantee Company and Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others.
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real
estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional
nonpublic personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former
customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as pennitted by law:
We also rimy disclose this information about our customers or fonner customers to the following
types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we
have joint marketing agreements:
* Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
* Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH
ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to
know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical,
electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your
nonpublic personal information.
Foam PRIV.POL.ORT
rieCe,t Ute{
• 1 (41003
The following application for amendment of planned unit development (PUD) is submitted by
LB Rose Ranch LLC ("Applicant") in accordance with the terms and provisions of Sections
4.12.03 and 10.00 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended.
Modification to Rose Ranch PUD Map
Enclosed hereto as Exhibit A is a Rose Ranch PUD Map that depicts a number of
proposed revisions to the Rose Ranch PUD Map (Amendment No. 1) recorded on Sept.
11, 2000. These revisions include the relocation of the Regional Trail which runs along
CR 109; the modification of boundaries for zone districts; the elimination of certain zone
districts and the elimination of potential overlooks.
Regional Trail. It is proposed that Applicant be allowed to construct the Regional Trail
along the east side of CR109 from the southern most boundary of Rose Ranch to a
termination point at the intersection opposite the Westbank Ranch subdivision entryway.
Applicant believes this will eliminate any conflicts that may have otherwise occurred
between pedestrians, bicycles and golf carts where the cart path and the regional path
were to co -exist. If this relocation is approved by the County, the County will need to
vacate the previously dedicated trail easement and accept the dedication of a new
easement coincident with the filing of the amended plat.
Golf II Elimination. Applicant proposes that the Golf II zone district be eliminated and
that the Golf Course Zone District be expanded to include the area previously designated
as Golf II. The primary distinction between Golf Course and Golf II was the allowance
in Golf II of an affordable apartment complex. Applicant would like to satisfy the
Affordable Housing requirements with 10 on-site owner occupied single family homes
and 20 on-site accessory dwelling units (see Section 4, below). Applicant therefore
would not need the Golf II zone district and proposes to eliminate it.
Community Park Elimination. Applicant proposes that the 2.14 acre Community Park
area be eliminated and that the fitness/pool/tennis complex located in this area be
alternatively located within the Golf Zone District and be owned and operated by the
Club at Ironbridge. Under this alternative, a sports membership will be included in the
sale of each lot or residence at Ironbridge, giving all Ironbridge residents the opportunity
to use the fitness/pool/tennis complex if they so desire. Residents would have the option
of activating their sports membership if they so desired by the payment of monthly club
dues.
Applicant believes there are several good reasons to have the fitness/pool/tennis complex
belong to the Club rather than the Ironbridge Property Owners Association.
a) The number of families using this facility will expand beyond the number owning
property at Ironbridge (previously Rose Ranch).
Iron Bridge (formerly Rose Ranch)
Zone District Text
Page 1
• •
b) The cost to operate and maintain the fitness complex would be shared by all of the
golf members (totaling 450), plus those Ironbridge (Rose Ranch) residents who
only want to have a sports membership. We anticipate that the annual operating
costs of this facility will approach $500,000 during the initial years. If only the
300 property owners were maintaining this facility, the cost to them would be
approximately $140/month. If the complex is a part of the golf club, the number
of users increases to approximately 650 and the cost per month to the property
owners who do not wish to join the golf club drops to $65/month.
c) Because the developer will include the initiation fee for a sports membership in
the sale price of each lot, all residents of Ironbridge will have the option of being
a member of the fitness/pool/tennis complex, but not the obligation. Residents
who do not want to expend $65/month can decline the opportunity to have a
sports membership in the club.
d) Shifting the ownership and management of fitness complex from the property
owners association to the club eliminates the substantial administrative
responsibilities of the association. The oversight and management of the
association is limited to landscape maintenance, thus dramatically simplifying the
association's operating practices.
Creation of PA 22. Applicant proposes that planning area 22 (PA 22) be created in the
area located immediately east of the Golf Course driving range and south of the overhead
transmission lines. This area would be approximate 2.2 acres in size, zoned Medium
Density Residential (see Zoning Text changes, below) and accommodate a minimum of
10 deed -restricted owner occupied units that would comply with the affordable housing
guidelines of Garfield County. (See Section 4. Affordable Housing, below, for additional
information.)
Interior Paths & Overlooks. On the revised Rose Ranch PUD map, Applicant would like
to remove references to overlooks.
Zoning Text Modifications
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a revised "Land Use Summary Table and Ironbridge PUD
Zoning Text" that would replace the table and text included in Resolution 98-80, and so
modified by Resolution 99-067. The following is a summary of the proposed
modifications to the Land Use Summary:
a) Change Duplex Lots designation to Medium Density Residential.
b) Change Club Homes designation to Club Villas and reduce the number of
approved units from 67 to 47.
c) Eliminate reference to Golf II, Clubhouse Apartments.
Iron Bridge (formerly Rose Ranch)
Zone District Text
Page 2
• •
d) Create PA 22, Medium Density Residential with 10 units in approx. 2.5 acres.
e) Adjust the Subtotal Units from 322 to 302, with the ability to allocate a total of 20
accessory dwelling units to planning areas zoned "20,000 s.f.", "15,000 s.f.", and
"9,000 s.f.".
f) Eliminate Community Park use under Common Open Space.
Precise acreage calculations and "% of Total" calculations shall be completed for the
Land Use Summary tables prior to final County approval.
In general an attempt was made to make the zoning definitions more flexible in the
"Duplex Residential" and "Club Homes" zones to allow future planning to respond to
market demands. Also, the definition of Golf Course was modified to allow for the
inclusion of the fitness/pool/tennis complex.
Affordable Housing Requirements
Under the Rose Ranch PUD Subdivision Improvements Agreement,
• 10 affordable housing units shall be constructed within a single structure located
within Golf Course Parcel 6;
• construction shall be completed and the units shall be made available for rent
prior to time that the County has issued more than 50% of the Phase 1 building
permits;
• the golf course cannot be operated unless satisfactory security is provided for the
completion of the 10 affordable housing units;
• no additional phases or subdivision may be pursued until the 10 units are
provided;
• the 10 affordable housing units shall be deemed acceptable to the County prior to
the expiration of the SIA.
Applicant would like to make the following proposal which, it believes, will enhance the
quality of life for residence of the affordable housing units and will improve the
integration of the affordable housing units with other community elements.
1. The 10 affordable rental units required for Phase 1 shall be constructed as
accessory dwelling units to 10 of the 66 houses constructed on interior lots located
within planning areas 10 — 13 and 15 — 18 within Phase 1. These ADUs will be
owned and maintained by the individual property owners on whose lots these
Iron Bridge (formerly Rose Ranch)
Zone District Text
Page 3
• •
ADUs reside. The lots will be deed restricted in a manner acceptable to the
County and the Garfield County Affordable Housing Authority. The 10 units will
have 1 bedroom and range in size from 400 to 600 s.f.
2. 10 affordable units will be located in a newly -created planning area (PA 22)
situated immediately east of the golf driving range and south of the overhead
transmission lines. These 10 units will be owner -occupied single family homes
with 3 to 4 bedrooms. The single family lots will be deed restricted in a manner
acceptable to the County and the Garfield County Affordable Housing Authority.
3. 10 additional affordable housing units will be constructed as 1 bedroom ADUs in
subsequent phases of Ironbridge in the following zone districts: 20,000 SF
Residential, 15,000 SF Residential and 9,000 SF Residential. For each additional
ADU that is constructed within Phase 1 beyond the required 10 units, the number
of ADUs to be situated in subsequent phases shall be reduced by one.
4. The obligation to provide 10 affordable housing units within Phase 1 shall be
secured by the following instruments:
a) a deed of trust recorded on PA 22 in favor of the County of Garfield in the
amount of $500,000
b) a deed restriction recorded on PA 22 which stipulates the land use as 10
owner -occupied, single family affordable housing units.
5. In an effort to acknowledge that it will take several years to fully build out the
Phase 1 neighborhood, the County will require that at least 15% of the housing
constructed on the 66 Phase 1 interior lots shall contain deed -restricted accessory
dwelling units until such time as all 10 units are constructed and made available
for rent. In the event that 2 of the first 12 units constructed on the interior Phase 1
lots do not contain ADUs, or if after the first 12 homes the number of percentage
of units with ADUs falls below 15%, then the Owner shall place $100,000 for
each deficient ADU into an escrow account, which funds shall be used for the
construction of an ADU in Phase 1 or subsequent phases.
Applicant believes that the provision of affordable housing in the manner described above
will result in units that are well-maintained. Applicant feels that the dispersion of 20
ADU units through out the community will result in a higher quality of life for the tenants
than if the units were assembled within one apartment complex. Based upon Applicant's
experience with ADUs in the valley, Applicant anticipates the owners of houses with
ADUs will substantially rely upon the additional rental income coming from the ADUs to
help them pay the mortgage payments on their homes and will have an incentive to keep
them occupied. Applicant is aware that the deed restriction on the ADUs will have to
clarify the responsibility of the owner to keep them occupied within the rental parameters
Iron Bridge (formerly Rose Ranch)
Zone District Text
Page 4
• •
published by the Garfield County Affordable Housing Authority. Finally, under the
existing requirements stipulated in the PUD approvals, the developer would have an
incentive to look offsite at older housing stock to fulfill its obligations for 20 additional
units. Under this proposal, the affordable housing is kept on site and physical condition
of these 30 units is new.
Miscellaneous Items
Construction Activities adjacent to Blue Heron Conservation Area. By way of clarification,
Paragraph B.1.m of Resolution 98-80 states that the construction of homes shall not occur on lots
94 — 96 and 108 - 118 from February 15 through May 31. Applicant is under the presumption
that this is a restriction against any construction activities on the exterior of the house between
these dates and that work can proceed on the interior where is does not impact the activities of
the Blue Heron.
Street Name Changes. In November, Applicant forwarded a list of street names to the County
that it desired to use in the Ironbridge community for Phase 1 as well as future phases. Applicant
received confirmation that the suggested names were acceptable. Applicant wants to include the
modification of street names to be included in this formal amendment process. The changes can
be summarized as follows:
Existing PUD Map
Existing Prelim. Plan/Phase
1Final Plat
Revised PUD Map/Prelim.
Plan/Phase 1 Final Plat
Road A
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road B
Blue Heron Way
Silver Mountain Drive
Road C
Bear Grass Road/Blue Heron
Way/Wild Rose Circle
Wild Rose Drive/Wild Rose
Court
Road D
White Peaks Lane
White Peaks Land
Road E
Meadow Sage Road/Gamble
Oak Circle
N/A
Road F
Meadow Sage Road
N/A
Road G
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road H
River Edge Lane
River Bend Way
Road I
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road J
Tamora Drive
Irornbridge Drive
Iron Bridge (formerly Rose Ranch)
Zone District Text
Page 5
Road K
Big Wing Drive
Meadow Sage Road
Road L
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road M
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road N
Red Bluff Circle
Red Bluff Court
Road 0
Long Shadow Lane
Gamble Oak Lane
Please refer to the Preliminary Plan map for locations of these streets.
Modification to Lot Locations. After reviewing the as -built location of the golf course, there
appears to be enough land next to Lot 19 to add an additional lot. Applicant proposes that a new
lot be created in this location on the Preliminary Plan, called Lot 19A. In order to keep the total
number of lots unchanged, Applicant would eliminate Lot 62 from the Preliminary Plan in
exchange for the create of Lot 19A.
Applicant and its representatives look forward to discussing these proposed
modifications in greater detail with Garfield County staff and the Board of Commissioners
during the coming weeks. The following individuals are available at your request to provide
additional information in the interim:
Michael Staheli, General Manager, Ironbridge
Richard Nash, Construction Manager, Ironbridge
Tim Thulson, Attorney, Balcomb & Green
Eric Tuin, Engineer, High Country Engineering
Iron Bridge (formerly Rose Ranch)
Zone District Text
Page 6
(970) 384-0169
(970) 384-0169
(970) 945-6546
(303) 925-0544
• .
Land Use Summary
P.U.D.
1. RESIDENTIAL MIN. LOT SIZE UNITS ACRES %/Total
PA1 15,000 S.F. 6
PA2 20,000 S.F. 9
PA3 River Res. 1 13
PA4 20,000 S.F. 8
PA5 15,000 S.F. 8
PA6 9,000 S.F. 14
PA7 9,000 S.F. 9
PA8 River Res. 1 8
PA9 River Res. 2 17
PA10 15,000 S.F. 4
PA11 9,000 S.F. 7
PA12 15,000 S.F. 6
PA13 15,000 S.F. 16
PA14 9,000 S.F. 2
PA15 20,1000 S.F. 10
PA16 15,000 S.F. 8
PA17 15,000 S.F. 18
PA18 15,000 S.F. 4
PA19 Med. Den. Res. 74
PA20 Club Villas 47
PA21 9,000 S.F. 4
PA22 Med. Den. Res'. 10
SUBTOTAL: 3022 115.34 21.6
2. ROADS 22.027 4.2
3. Golf Course 233.514 43.7
4. Community Open Space 162.308 30.5
TOTAL ACREAGE 534.189 100.0
GROSS DENSITY
COMMERCIAL USE
(MAXIMUM)
0.60 DU/AC
25,000 SQUARE FEET
PA 22 will accomodate a minimum of (10) owner -occupied affordable dwelling units
2. Unit total will be increased to 322 if all affordable dwelling units are located on site within Ironbridge PUD
• •
A. Applicability
To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations,
as amended, the Ironbridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zone District is divided
into the following zone district classifications:
• River Residential 1 Zone District
• (PA's 3 & 8)
• River Residential 2 Zone District
• (PA 9)
• 20,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 2, 4, & 15)
• 15,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 1, 5, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17 & 18)
• 9,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA 6, 7, 11, 14, 19, 21)
• Medium Density Residential Zone District
(PA 19 & 22))
• Club Villas Residential Zone District
• (PA 20)
• Common Open Space Zone District
• Golf Course
• Common Open Space (General)
The PUD plan identifies twenty-one (22) distinct Planning Areas (PA's) in which
residential development may occur. Totaling 118.34 acres, the residential development
will be confined to approximately 21.7% of the site. The remainder of the site is
designated for roadways (4.9%) and Common Open Space (73.4%). Within the
Common Open Space Zone District, the Golf Course comprises 41.8%, and the
Common Open Space (General) comprises 31.5% of the total PUD acreage. The land
use summary on the PUD and within this document delineates the overall land use and
density proposed for the Rose Ranch PUD by Planning Area.
D. Zoning Districts
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 2
• •
1. River Residential 1 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; non -habitable accessory
buildings and structures; home offices; sales/marketing
center; public and private roads; Private Open Space
Easements; open space; utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 0.70 acres
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 175', except for lots which are narrower due to added
depth
Minimum lot depth:
175', except for lots which are more shallow due to
available depth between road and wetland/boundary 30'
from ordinary high watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
40' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 30' for lots
less than 200' deep
50' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 25' for lots
less than 200' deep
30' for lots 200' minimum width; 25' for lots less than
200' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the
garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
2. River Residential 2 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures.
Permitted Uses:
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 3
Single-family residential units; non -habitable accessory
buildings and structures; home offices; sales/marketing
center; public and private roads; Private Open Space
Minimum lot size:
Maximum building height:
Minimum lot width:
Minimum lot depth:
Easements; open space; utility and drainage easements
0.50 acres
35'
100'
175', except for lots which are more shallow due to
available depth between road and wetland/boundary 30'
from ordinary high watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side
35' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots
less than 175' deep
50' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots
less than 175' deep
30' for lots 150' minimum width; 20' for lots less than
150' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the
garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
3. 20,000 Square Foot Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures and affordable Accessory Dwelling
Units.
Permitted Uses:
Single-family residential units; deed restricted attached or
detached Accessory Dwelling Units complying with the
requirements of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations
governing Affordable Housing for Rent (Section
5.09.05.03 (3)(1999)); non -habitable accessory buildings
and structures; home offices; sales/marketing center;
public and private roads; open space; and utility and
drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 4
• •
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 80', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 150'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 30'
Rear 20'
Side 10'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the
garage and/or driveway.
Other:
The gross floor area for residential use occupancy within any Accessory
Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1500 sq. feet. Building envelopes shall
be finalized at time of subdivision.
4. 15,000 Square Foot Zone District
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures and affordable Accessory Dwelling
Units.
Single-family residential units; deed restricted attached or
detached Accessory Dwelling Units complying with the
requirements of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations
governing Affordable Housing for Rent (Section
5.09.05.03 (3)(1999)); non -habitable accessory buildings
and structures; home offices; sales/marketing center;
public and private roads; open space; and utility and
drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 15,000 square feet
Minimum lot width: 80', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 120'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 5
• •
Front 30'
Rear 20'
Side 10
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage
and/or driveway.
Other:
The gross floor area for residential use occupancy within any Accessory
Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1500 sq. feet. Building envelopes shall
be finalized at time of subdivision.
5. 9,000 Square foot Residential Zone District
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
Individual lot ownership with single family detached
residential structures and affordable Accessory Dwelling
Units.
Single-family residential units; deed restricted attached or
detached Accessory Dwelling Units complying with the
requirements of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations
governing Affordable Housing for Rent (Section
5.09.05.03 (3)(1999)); non -habitable accessory buildings
and structures; home office; sales/marketing center;
public and private roads; open space; and utility and
drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 9,000 square feet
Minimum lot width: /.175', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 90'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 25'
Rear 20'
Side 10'
Parking: A minimum of 2 off street parking spaces must be provided for each
primary structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 6
Other:
• •
and/or driveway.
The gross floor area for residential use occupancy within any Accessory
Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1500 sq. feet. Building envelopes shall
be finalized at time of subdivision.
6. Medium Density Zone District
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Individual lot and unit ownership with single
family/multi-family residential structures
Single-family residential units; multi -family residential
units; attached and detached non -habitable accessory
buildings and structures; home office; sales/marketing
center; time share or fractional ownership units; public
and private roads; open space; and utility and drainage
easements
4,000 sq. feet for detached units; no minimum lot size for
attached units — common ownership of open areas
including parking areas within this zone is permitted.
Minimum lot width (detached): 35', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth (detached): 50'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum setbacks from lot lines:
Single Family
Front 20'
Rear 15'
Side 5'
Multi -Family
Front 15' from street
Rear 15'
Side 0' with 10' minimum between primary structures,
excluding attached units
Parking: A minimum of 2 parking spaces must be provided for each primary
structure; this requirement may be satisfied by garage, driveway, on -
street parking and/or common parking area.
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 7
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
7. Club Villas Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with single family
residential structures
Permitted Uses:
Minimum lot size:
Single-family residential units attached or detached; non -
habitable accessory buildings and structures; home offices;
sales/marketing center; time-share or fractional
ownership units; public and private roads; open space;
trails; and utility and drainage easements; community
gardens
4,000 square feet for detached units; no minimum lots size
for attached units — common ownership of open areas
within this zone district is permitted
Maximum Gross Density: 8 dwelling units/acre
Minimum Gross Density: 4.0 dwelling units/acre
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 35' for detached units; no minimum lot width for
attached units
Minimum lot depth: 50' for detached units; no minimum lot depth for
attached units
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front 15' from street
Rear 15'
Side 0' with 10' minimum between primary structures,
excluding attached units
Parking: A minimum of 2 parking spaces must be provided for each primary
structure; this requirement may be satisfied by garage, driveway, on -
street parking and/or common parking area.
8. Common Open Space Zone District
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 8
•
Intent: To provide a hierarchy of privately owned open space,
both developed and undeveloped.
a. Golf Course
Intent:
Permitted Uses:
To provide an opportunity for recreational golf.
Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse facilities
including but not limited to pro shop, restaurant;
lounge; driving range; golf related activities; golf
shelters; golf course maintenance and accessory
facilities; tennis; swimming pool; volley ball;
health/fitness center; utilities; utilities access
Maximum structure height:: 35' restricted to golf course clubhouse and
health/fitness center building; other structures
limited to maximum height of 25'
Maximum structure height (utilities)::
Minimum building setbacks:
Other:
35', restricted to water storage tank;
other structures limited to
maximum height of 25'
To County Road 109 30'
To any adjacent residential use 20'
b. Common Open Space (General)
Golf course acreage will be finalized during
platting; golf course may be parcelized /
platted for ownership purposes
Intent: To provide open areas for recreation, visual relief;
buffering and wildlife habitat
Permitted Uses:
Useable open space, limited open space;
community gardens; community greenhouse;
parking; trails; pedestrian linkages; golf cart paths;
ponds; overlooks; drainage and utility easements;
utilities; utilities access; public fishing easement
Maximum structure height (utilities):
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 9
35', restricted to water storage tank;
other structures limited to
maximum height of 25'