HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application FormGARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning DePartment
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood SPrings, Colorado 81601
Te leph o ne : gZ O.-geS. g 21 2 F acsimi le : 970' 38 4'347 0
www.qarfield-cou ntv.com
h*l:EI\ar;U
zone District / comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
GENERAL INFORMATION
(to be comPleted bY $le aPplicant')
) Name of Propertv Owner (Aoplicant)l LB Rose Raneh
Address:4l0 rronbridse Drive Telephone: (970) 947-9800
CitY:@State: Co ZipCode: 81601 FAX:(.9].0) gz8-88
) Name of Ownerrs Representative. if anv (Planner. Attornev' etc)'
>> Addresst 410 Ironbridse Drive Telephone: (970) 947-9800
> City:cr"*ooa sptiog" State: co Zip Code: 81601 FAx:@gJ
Street Address / General Location of Property; 41o rronbridge rlrive
G'l enurnnd SFr{ ngs CO R1 6Ol
Legal Description: See attached Exhibl-ts
Existing Use & Size of Property (in acres): 73.5e8
Property's Current Zone District Designation PUD
Proposed Zone District Designation:PUD
Proper$'s current comprehensive Plan Designation: subdlvlslon
Property's'StudyArea" Designation: 1
STAFF USE ONLY
Date Submitted:- TC Date:
2.
I. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any aadtional information to
be submitted with this application:
1. The Colorado Relised Statutes (CRS) establish general standards of review for rezoning land
in the county. The standard used to review a rezoning request depends on whether the
proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. lf so, the proposed rezoning
need only bear a reasonable relationship to the general welfare of the community. If tha
rezoning would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, the Applicant generally needs to
show either 1) that an error was made in establishing the current zoning, or 2) thai there has
been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood that supports the requested zone change.
Depending on the subject property's Comprehensive Plan designation as mentioned above,
you will need to appropriately address one of the following standards in a narrative form being
as descriptive and specific as possible:
A. The proposed rezoning for the subject propefi is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan. As such, the proposed rezoning Deals a reasonable
relationship to the general welfare of the community.
B. lf the rezoning would be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, the Applicantgenerally needs to show either 1) that an effor was made in establishing thi iunent
zoning, or 2) that there has been a change in the conditions of the neighborhood that
supports the requested zone change.
lf the proposed zoning of the subject property conflicts with the curent designation as defined
on the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Districts Map, an Applicant may wish to
amend the Comprehensive Plan designation so that the proposed rezoning does not conflict
with the Comprehensive Plan Map. lf an Applicant requests to amend this Map, they will needto Provide a thorouqh narrative that shows how their prooosed Comorehensive plan
desisnation is better suited than the existino desiqnation bv addressinq the ooals. objective$policies. and oroorams listed for that desionation in the Comprehensivffi
can be obtained from the Building and Planning Department upon request.
Submit a zoning map showing the curent zoning of the subject property and adjacent
properties.
Submit a vicinity map showing relative location of the property at a scale of 1" = 2000,, and
extending at least Yzmile from allproperty boundaries.
Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all
mineral rights owners of the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to-tne
property.
S.ubmit a list of all property owners and their addresses adjacent to or within 200 ft. of the site.This information can be obtained from the Assessol,s Office.
submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property.
lf you are acting as an agent for the propgrty owner, you must attach an acknowtedgement
from the property owner that you may act in his/her Oenif.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
9. Submit payment of the $450.00 Base Fee: Applicant shall sign the "Agreement for Payment"
form and provide the fee with the application.
10. Submit 2 copies of this completed application form and all the required submittal materials to
the Building and Planning Department. Staff wil! request additional copies once the application
has been deemed technically complete.
II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
(A Zone District Map Amendment is considered a two step process because it is first reviewed by
the Planning Commission which makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissions.
The following steps outline how the Zone District Map Amendment application review process
works in Garfield County.)
Submit this completed application form (pages 1-4), base fee, and all submitta! requirements to
the Garfield County Planning Department. lt will be received and given to a Staff Planner who
will review the application for technical completeness.
Once the application is deemed technically complete, the Staff Planner will send you a letter
indicating the application is complete. ln addition, the letter w!!! indicate the dates and times
scheduled for your request to be heard before the Planning Commission during a public
meeting (no notice required) and the Board of County Commissioners during a public hearing
(notice required). The Planning Commission will forward a recommendation to the Board of
County Commissioners to be considered during a properly noticed public hearing. Staff will
send you the appropriate "Public Notice Form(s)" indicating the time and date of your public
hearing and will provide you with a Staff Memorandum regarding your requested Zone District
Amendment. (lf Statr determines your application to be deficient, a letter will be sent to you
indicating that additiona! information is needed to deem your application cqmplete.)
Please note, if an application inctudes a request to amend the current designation as defined
on the Comprehensive Plan's Proposed Land Use Districts Map, the request may be
considered at the same meeting before the Planning Commission. However, the request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be considered prior to the request to amend the zoning
map. ln addition, the Applicant shall be required to provide proper notice (as described below)
for the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the Planning Commission to hold a
public hearing on the request. Further, the Planning Commission is the fina! decision maker on
the Comprehensive Plan amendment request whereas the Planning Commission will make a
recommendation on the rezoning request to the Board of County Commissioners.
It is solely the Applicant's responsibility to ensure proper noticing occurs regarding the public
hearing before the Planning Commission and / or the Board of County Commissioners. tf
proper notice has not occurred, the oublic hearino will not occur. Notice requirements are as
follows:
4.
Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot,
a description of the proposed amendment and nature of the hearing, and the date, time
and place for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in
that portion of the County in which the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but
no! mory than sixty (60) days prior to the date of such hearing, and proof of
publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant.
Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (1) above, shalt be
mailed to all owners of record as shown in the County Assesior's Office of lots within
two hundred feet (200') of the subject lot and to all owners of mineral interest in the
subject property at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such
hearing time by certified return receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the
hearing by the applicant.
c. The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a
public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The
posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the
hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to lpost the notice, and
ensure that it remains posted until and during the date of the hearifrg.
The Applicant is required to appear before the Planning Commission an( the Board of County
Commissioners at the time and date of the public meeting / hearing atlwhich time they will
consider the request. ln addition, the Applicant shall provide proof at the hearing before the
Board of County Commissioners (and Planning Commission for an Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan) that proper notice was provided.
6. Once the Planning Commission and/ or the Board of County Commissiorhers make a decision
regarding the request(s), Staff will provide the Applicant with a signed resolution memorializing
the action taken by either Board. Following the Boards' approva!, this dffice will change the
property's zoning designation on the zoning map and the Comprehen$ive Plan Map (if so
decided) if approved.
I have read the above and provided the required attached information which is
my
7/Zz t/
DatE
Last Revised : 12lO2l2OO2
EDwAnD MULHALL. JT.
Scorr EaLcoMc
LarlvRENcE R. GnEEN
TrMorHY A, TlruLlox
Oavro C, HaLLFgRo
C}rRTSToPHEF L, CoYLE
THoMAg J. HaRTeit
CHRrlToFH€e L. GEloER
AxxE MARIa McPHeC
SaFA M. Our{x
OaNTEL C. WEi.l{ooLE
Scorr GRogscuP
OF CouxsEL;
KENNS|H BALCOT.E
rJOHX A. THULSON
SPEGnL Cou[!EL:
WAL"ER D. LOWNY
BALCoMB & GREEN, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT I/Aw
P.C). DRAI^.En 79()
818 Cor.oRADo AvENrrr
Gr,ENwooD SpBrNcs, CoLoRADo 8t6op
Tat ePrIoNE: 97().e45.6546
F^oarurr.E: 97O.S45.89O2
www.balcombgreen.com
September 27,?fi05
VIA: T{AND DELIVERY
Richard Wheeler, Senior Planner
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
108 8d' Street, Ste. 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: ApplicationforPUDAmendment/PreliminaryPlanflronbridge
Planned Unit Development
Dear Richard:
I provide herewith for filing in your office five copies of the revised Narative
Statement,ApplicationforAmendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopment("PUD"),Ironbridge
PUD. This Narrative Statement replaces and supplants in its entirety the previous
Nar:ative Statement filed with your office on August 26,2005.
The sole differencebetween this revised Narrative Statement and its predecessor is
set forth in Subparagraph I hereof and addresses the addition of detached bedroom units
identified as "Casita Lrnits". As proposed, a Casita Unit does not constitute a dwelling unit
given that it is limited simply to a bedroom and bathroom, does not contain kitchen
facilities and as such, cannot be used independently for residential occupancy.
It is my understanding that this submission is timely given that Planning Staffs
completeness review of lronbridge's earlier submission is currently ongoing.
Ihavealsoincluded herewith theMylarfortheAmended FinalPlatLots 139and 140
which has been signed by all parties except the County Surueyor. It is my understanding
that Scott Aibner has previously reviewed this Plat and that the same is acceptable to him.
Accordingly I would ask that you deliver the Mylar to Mr. Aibner for his signahrre and that
once signed, schedule this matter before the Board of County Commissioners for execution
by the Chairman.
Bar.coMB & GREEN, P.C.
A1DII()RNEYS AT I/AIil
Mr. Richard Wheeler September W,?fr05
Page2
Should you have any questions or concerrui regarding any of the above, please feel
freetocontactmyself attheabovetelephonenumberorMkeWoelkeatlronbridgeHomes,
LLC. Mike's telephone number is (970) 40Lfi45.
Enclosures
cc: Mike Woelke
DirkGosda
Very tnrly yours,
Narrative Statement
Application for Amendment to Planned Unit Development (65PUD")
(Ironbridge PUD)
This application for Planned Unit Development amendment is submitted by and on
behalf of LB Rose Ranch LLC ('Applicant") pursuant to Sections 4.12.03 and 10.00 of the
Garfield County /,sning Resolution of 1978, as amended, and addresses the Planning Areas
("PA's") hereinbelow identified as contained within the Ironbridge Planned Unit Development
heretofore approved by the Board of County Commissioners. for Garfield County, Colorado
under ResolutionNo. 2004-20. The amendments sought hereunder axe as follows:
I. PA's 3 and 8 (River Residential l Tnne District), PA 9 (River Residential2 7.one
Distri@, PA's 2, 4, and 15 (201000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential T,one District),
PA's 1, 5, 10, l2r 13,16,l7 &18 (15,000 Square Foot (Minimum) ResidentialZ.one District)
and PA's 6,7r1\14r19 and,Zl (9,000 Square Foot (Minimum) ResidentialZane District)
ZorcDistrrct Text Amendment allowing one (l) accessory detached habitable structure
consisting of either one bedroorn, studio or work shop togther with one bathroonl the gross floor
area of which shall not exceed three hundred (300) square feet ("Casita Unit"). Each Casita Unit
shall be used and/or occupied exclusively by the Owner(s) or the family members and guest(s) of
the Owner(s) of the subject Lot, shall not contain any kitchen facilities and shall not be leased.
II. PA 19 (Medtum Density Residential Zone District)
A. ZoreTextAmendment reducing the front yard setback to ten feet (10'). Under
present zoning the front yard setback is established at twenty feet (20) for single family
residences and at fifteen feet (15') for multi-family residences. This amendment is sought for the
following reasons:
I . As originally planned, P A 22 was to be drained pursuant to a series of drainage
ditches and swales, the construction of which in large measure required the presently
established setbacks. Applicant now proposes to effect drainage pursuant to a storm. water drain systern (gutters and drains) which in turn, may adequately be located within
the reduced setback. Applicant believes a storm drain system as opposed to the
previous$ proposed ditch and swale systern, better addresses the geotechnical issues
presented by the soils in this area. This modification to the drainage is more fully
discussed within the application for Preliminary Plan for this are (Phase tV, Block 4)
submitted simultaneous herewith; I and
LPursuant to Section 4.08.01, Appticant has combined this appticationfor PL1D amendment together with
its applicationfor Preliminary Planfor the re-subdivision of Phase IV, Block 4(PA 19), Phase II, Block 1(PA 22)
and Golf Parcel6, Phase I
Application for Armdment ofPlrnned Unit Developrnent @A's 19 aad 22)
Irorbridge Planaed Unit Development Page I
2. Reduction of the front yard setback will reduce the extent and de$ee of overlot
grading that will be required for the location and construction of the proposed residential
dwelling structures.
B. ZoneTertAmendment increasing the total rssidsn.tial density from seventy-four
Q\ to seventy-eight (78) units to allow for the siting of an additional adding four (a) affordable
dwelling units.2
m. PA 22 (Medium Density Residential Tnne Dtstrict)
A. ZoneTextAmendment increasing the total residential densrty fromten (10) to
twenty (20) to allow for the siting of ten (10) additional affordable dwelling units.
B. ZoneTertAmendment reducing the right-of-way accessing this area from forty
feet (a0) to twenty-sxfeet(26'\.
C. Zone District Amendment expanding the district boundaries forPA22to
acconrnodate the increase in affordable dwelling units above stated. By Implication, this
amendment correspondingly reduces the adjacent parcel zoned Golf Course (Phase I, Golf
Course Parcel 6). A map highlighting the district boundary amendments sought in this mea in
relation to existing district boundaries is attached hereto as E>rhibit l. A revised PUD map of the
Ironbridge PUD in its entirety and including these amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
z(Jnder Resolution No. 2004- 20, Applicant was allowed the flexibility to site up to an additionat wenty (20)
affordable dwelling units within either the Medium Residential or Club Villas zone districts ($g Paragraph 38.2))
Application for Armeadnrat ofPlanned Uait Developrnert @A's 19 and 22)
Imnbridge Planaed Unit Developnmt Page 2
Narrative Statement
Application for Amendment to Planned Unit Development (66PUD")
(Ironbridge PUD)
This application for Planned Unit Development amendment is submitted by and on
behalf of LB Rose Ranch LLC ('Applicant") pursuant to Sections 4.12.03 and 10.00 of the
Garfield County ZonngResolution of 1978, as amended, and addresses Planning Areas
("PA's") l9 and 22 of the Ironbridge Planned Unit Development heretofore approved by the
Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado under Resolution No. 2004-20.
The amendments sought hereunder are as follows:
PA 19 (Medium Density Residential7,one District)
1. Zone Text Amendment reducing the front yard setback to ten feet (10'). Under
present zonrngthe front yard setback is established at twenty feet (20') for single family
residences and at fifteen feet (15') for multi-family residences. This amendment is sought for the
following reasons:
A. As originatly planned, PA 19 was to be drained pursuant to a series of drainage
ditches and swales, the construction of which in large measure required the presently
established setbacks. Applicant now proposes to effect drainage pursuant to a storm
water drain system (gutters and drains) which in turn, may adequately be located within
the reduced setback. Applicant believes a storm drain system as opposed to the
previously proposed ditch and swale systern, better addresses the geotechnical issues
presented by the soils in this area. This modification to the drainage is more fully
discussed within the application for Preliminary Plan for this are (Phase IV, Block 4)
submitted simultaneous herewith; I and
B. Reduction of the front yard setback will reduce the extent and degree of overlot
grading that will be required for the location and construction of the proposed residential
dwelling structures.
2. ZoneTertAmendment increasing the total residential density from seventy-four
Q\ to seventy-eight (78) units to allow for the siting of an additional adding four (a) affordable
dwelling units.2
LPursuant to Section 4.05.01, Applicant has combined this applicationfor PUD amendment togetherwith
its applicationfor Preliminary Planfor parcels inclusive of these Planning Areas.
z(Jnder Resolution No. 2004-20, Applicant was allowed the flexibility to site up to an additional twenty (20)
affordable dwelling unitswithin either the Medium Residential or Club Villas zone districts ($g Paragraph 38.2)
Application for Amenclment of Planned Unit Development (PA's 19 ard22)
Ironbridge Plarned Unit Development Page I
P A 22 (Medium D ensity Residential Zone District)
1 . Zone T ext Amendment increasing the total residential density from ten ( I 0) to
twenty (20) to allow for the siting of ten (10) additional affordable dwelling units.
2. ZoneTertAmendment reducing the right-of-way accessing this area from forty
feet (40') to twenty-six feet (26').
3. Zone District Amendment expanding the district boundaries for PA22 to
accomrnodate the increase in aflordable dwelling units above stated. By Implication, this
amendment correspondingly reduces the adjacent parcel zoned Golf Course (Phase I, Golf
Course Parcel6). A map highlighting the district boundary amendments sought in this area in
relation to existing district boundaries is attached hereto as Extribit 1. A revised PUD map of the
Ironbridge PUD in its entirety and including these amendment is attached hereto as E>rhibit 2.
Application forAmeadment ofPlannedUnit Development (PA's 19 aad 22)
Ironbridse Plamed Unit Development
Eowario MULHALL; Ji.
Scotr BALcor.E
LAwRExcE R. 6REEN
NMoTHv A. THULIO}.I
OavlD C. HALLToRo
CHrtr3"oPHEF L. CoYLE
THoMAs.J. HAFTEff
CHRI.ToFHER L. GCK,ER
AxrE MaRrE McPHEe
SaRA M. Dur.x
L)ANIEL C. WExxooLE
scorr GnosscuP
VIA: HAI,ID DELIVERY
Bar,coMB & GREEN, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT IfA\^/
P.O. DRA\A/ER' ?EO
818 COLORA.D() A\rENT'E
(ir,ENwooD spBrNcs, Cor.oRADo a16o2
'TELEPrronrE: 9?O.945.654O
FAcarurr.E: e7O.e,{5.ClgO2
www.balcombgreen.com
September 27,2005
OF CouxsEL:
KExilgrH Balcotia
JoH,T A. THUL3OX
SP€clAL Coux3sL:
WALTEN O. LOWFY
Richard Wheeler, Senior Planner
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
108 8th Street, Ste. 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81501
Rs ApplicationforPUDAmendmentlPreliminaryPlanfironbridge
Planned Unit Development
Dear Richard:
I provide herewith for filing in your office five copies of the revised Narative
Statement,ApplicationforAmendmenttoPlannedUnitDevelopment("PLID'),lronbridge
PUD. This Narrative Statement replaces and supplants in its entirety the previous
Narrative Statement filed with your office on August 26,?.005.
The sole difference.between this revised Narrative Statement and its predecessor is
set forth in Subparagraph I hereof and addresses the addition of detached bedroom units
identified as "Casita Units". As proposed, a Casita Unit does not constitute a dwelling unit
glven that it is limited simply to a bedroom and bathroom, does not contain kitchen
facilities and as such, cannot be used independently for residential occupancy.
It is my understanding that this submission is timely glven that Planning Staffs
completeness review of Ironbridge's earlier submission is currently ongoing.
Ihavealsoincluded herewith theMylarfortheAmendedFinalPlatLots 139 and 140
which has been signed by ull parties except the County Surveyor. It is my understanding
that Scott Aibner has previously reviewed this Plat and that the same is acceptable to him.
Accordingly I would ask that you deliver the Mylar to Mr. Aibner for his signature and that
once signed, schedule this matterbefore the Board of County Commissioners forexecution
by the Chairman.
BAf,coMB & GREEN, P.C.
AIITORNTYS AT IAlr,
Mr. Richard Wheeler September 27,?fr05
PageZ
Shoutd you have any questions or concems regarding any of the above, please feel
free to contact myself at the above telephone number or Mike Woelke at Ironbridge Homes,
LLC. Mike's telephone numberis (970) 444.7045.
Enclosures
cc: Mike Woelke
Dirk Gosda
Very tmly yours,
Narrative Statement
Apptication for Amendment to Planned Unit Development (66PUD")
(Ironbridge PUD)
This application for Planned Unit Development amendment is submitted by and on
behatf of LB ftose Ranch LLC ('Applicant") pursuant to Sections 4.12.03 and 10'00 of the
Garfield County ZotngResolution of 1978, as amended, and addresses the Planning Areas
(.,pA's") hereinbelow identified as contained within the Ironbridge Planned Unit Development
heretofore approved by the Board of County Commissioners. for Garfield County, Colorado
under ResolutionNo. 2004-20. The amendments sought hereunder are as follows:
I. PA's 3 and 8 (River Residential l T,oneDistrict), PA 9 (River Residential 2 7'one
District), PA,s 2, 4, anil1s (20,000 Square Foot (Minimum) ResidentialZ,one District)'
pA's 1, 5, LOr12,13,L6,17 &1S (15,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential 7,one District)
and PA,s 617rll)14,lg and 21 (9,000 Square Foot (Mfuimum) ResidentlalZ.one District)
Zone District Text Amendment allowing one (l) accessory detached habitable structure
consisting of either one bedroorn, studio or work shop togther with one bathroorn, the gross floor
area of which shall not exceed three hun&ed (300) square feet ("Casita Unit"). Each Casita Unit
shall be used and/or occupied exclusively by the Owner(s) or the family members and guest(s) of
the Owner(s) of the subject Lot, shall not contain any kitchen facilities and shall not be leased.
tr. PA 19 (Medium Density Residential Zone District)
A. ZoneTextAmendment reducing the front yard setback to ten feet (10'). Under
present zoning the front yard setback is established at twenty feet (20') for single family
iesidences and at fifteen
-feet
(15') for multi-family residences. This amendment is sought for the
following reasons:
l. As originally planned, PA22 was to be drained pursuant to a series of drainage
ditches and swales,,tfie construction of which in large measure required the presently
established setbacks. Applicant now proposes to effect drainage pursuant to a storm
water drain system (gutiers and drains) which in turn, may adequately be located within
the reduced setback. Applicant believes a storm drain system as opposed to the
previously proposed ditch and swale system, better addresses the geotechnical issues
presented by the soils in this area. This modification to the drainage is more fully
discussed within the application for Preliminary Plan for this are (Phase IV, Block 4)
submitted simultaneous herewithr and
rPursuant to Section 4.08.01, Appticant has combined this appticationfor PUD amendment together with
its appticationfor Preliminary Ptan for iie re-subdivision of Phase IY, Block 4(PA 19), Phase II, Block 1(PA 22)
and Golf Parcel6, Phase I
Application for Anrndmert ofPtanned Urit Developnrnt @A's 19 aad 22)
Imabridge Plaoned UlitDevelo,Pmeat Page I
Z. Reduction of the front yard setback will reduce the extent and degree of overlot
grading that will be required for the location and construction of the proposed residential
dwelling structures.
B. Zone Text Amendment increasing the total residential density from seventy-four
(74) to seventy-eight (78) units to allow for the siting of an additional adding four (a) affordable
dwelling units.2
In. PA 22 (Medium Density Residential 7,ote Dlstrict)
A. ZoneTextAmendment increasing the total residential density fromten (10) to
twenty (20) to allow for the siting of ten (10) additional affordable dwelling units.
B. Zone Text Amendment reducing the right-of-way accessing this area from forty
feet (40') to twenty-six feet (26').
C. Zone District Amendment expanding the district boundaries forPA22to
accorrunodate the increase in affordable dwelling units above stated. By Implication, this
amendment correspondingly reduces the adjacent parcel zoned Golf Course (Phase I, Golf
Course Parcel6). A map highlighting the district boundary amendments sought in this area in
relation to existing district boundaries is attached hereto as El&ibit 1. A revised PUD map of the
Ironbridge PUD in its entirety and including these amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
2tJnder Resolution No. 2004-20, Applicant was allowed thellexibility to site up to an additional twenty (20)
affordabte fuinlling units within either the Medium Residential or Club Villas zone districts ($g Paragraph 38.2))
Applicction forAmndrreat ofPla,nnedUait Developnrent @A's 19 ad 22)
Imnbridge Phaoed Unit Developmnt Page 2