HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.01 Resolution 99-067STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
John Martin
Larry McCown
Walt Stowe
Don Deford
Mildred Alsdorf
Edward Green
1
Exhibit
B
Page 1 of 8
1►411111:11111IIII 111111 II VIII 1111111 111 11111
54685f 63P 81133 P911 M COUNTYAORF
CO
11111111111111111111111111111111111111 lI VIII tI 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03.49P 81565 P634 M ALSDORF
35 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
)ss
FINAL 6-7-99 BCC
At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado,
held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse, in Glenwood Springs on
Tuesday, the fourth day of Mkt/ A.D. 1999 , there were present:
, Commissioner, Chairman
, Commissioner
, Commissioner
, County Attorney
, Clerk of the Board
, County Administrator
when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit:
RESOLUTION NO. 9 9- 0 6 7
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR THE ROSE RANCH
SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, has received
application from the Roaring Fork Investments for a subdivision and land development plan to
allow for approval of a PUD Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, on Monday and Tuesday, the 20th and 21'
days of July A.D. 1998, approved a Planned Unit Development for the Rose Ranch Subdivision and
Land Development per Resolution 98-80; and
WHEREAS, Roaring Fork Investments is requesting an series of amendments to the Rnse
Ranch Planned Unit Development Resolution; and
WHEREAS, to the extent that the original Planned Unit Development, as approved by
Resolution 98-80, is not modified or altered by the terms of this Resolution, the original resolution
remains in effect; and
L
1 111111 iifl; 1111111111111111111111111111111 11111 11111111
546856'06/08/1999 03:43P B1133 P912 M ALSDORF
2 of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
WHEREAS, Garfield County Planning Commission held a public hearing on 10 February,
1999 and continued said hearing to 17 February, 1999, upon the question of whether the above
described PUD Amendment should be granted or denied, at which hearing the public and interested
persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions concerning the approval or the denial
of said PUD Amendment; and
WHEREAS. The Garfield County Planning Commission reviewed the application and
recommended conditional approval to the Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on 4 Mav, 1999, upon the question of whether
the above described PUD Amendment should be granted or denied, at which hearing the public and
interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the approval or
the denial of said PUD Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board, on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the
aforementioned hearing, has made the following determination of fact as listed below.
1. That proper publication and public notice was provided, as required by law, for the
hearing before the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners.
2. That the hearing before the Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters, and
issues were submitted, and that all interested parties were heard at that hearing.
3. That the Garfield County Planning Commission recommended conditional approval
of the PUD Amendments.
4. That the proposed PUD Amendments is in compliance with the recommendations set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated area of the County.
5. That the application is in compliance with the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
of 1978, as amended.
6. That all data, surveys, analyses, studies, plans, and designs, as required by the State
of Colorado and by Garfield County, have been submitted, reviewed, and found that
said information will meet all sound planning and engineering requirements of the
Garfield County Subdivision Regulations upon compliance with the conditions
contained herein.
7. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed use, upon compliance with all
conditions of approval, will be in the best interest of the health, safety, morals,
convenience, order, prosperity, and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
Page 2 of 8
i 111111 nisi 11111 IlUl im mill 11111 III 11111 1111 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P635 M ALSDORF
36 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
41111 PP111111111111111iii 11111111111111111111 Ilii 1111
146856 06/08/1999 03:43P B1133 P913 M ALSDORF
ti of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
And, WHEREAS the Board has made the following determination of findings as listed
below.
1. The Applicant's application was filed with the Planning Department of Garfield
County and determined to be incomplete on the 24th of November 1998, and later
accepted as complete on the 23r1 of December 1998, and referred to the Planning
Commission on the 14th of December 1998.
2. The Garfield County Planning Commission reviewed the Application and
recommended conditional approval of the Application under certain conditions on
the 17`h of February 1999.
3. The Board of County Commissioners established a date for the public hearing on the
Application for the 20th of April 1999, which was continued to the 4th of May 1999
at 1:30 p,m..
4. Pursuant to evidence produced at the public hearing on this Application, the Board
finds:
a. that the property owners adjacent to the property that is the subject of this
Application received notification of the date, time, and location of the above -
referenced public hearing by certified mail, sent at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the commencement of the hearing;
b. that notification of the public hearing was published in a newspaper of
general circulation at least thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of the
hearing;
c. that the substance of the mailed and published notification substantially
informed interested parties of the subject matter and the location of the
requested subdivision;
d. that the Board of County Commissioners has jurisdiction to conduct the
public hearing on the Application and to render a decision thereon; and
e. that the requested PUD Amendment does not affect in a substantially adverse
manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the
property that is the subject of this Application, or the public interest, and is
not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person.
5. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and
complete; all pertinent facts, matters, and issues were submitted; and all interested
parties were heard at the hearing.
Page 3 of 8
1111111 11111 IIIIII 1111111111111111 IIIII III I111I 1111 X111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P636 M ALSDORF
37 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
I 111111 111111 11111! 111 111111111111111111111111 1111
546856`06/08/1999 03:43P B1133 P914 M ALSDORF
4 of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
6. That all representations of the applicant, either within the application or stated at the
public hearings before the Planning commission and the board of County
Commissioners, shall be considered conditions of approval, unless stated otherwise
by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commission.
7. The PUD Amendment, as conditioned herein and in accordance with §4.04 of the
Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended, and §24-67-105(1), C.R.S.,
as amended, will be in general conformity with the Garfield County Comprehensive
Plan.
8. Pursuant to §4.07.01 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended,
the Board of County Commissioners herein find that, subject to strict compliance
with the conditions set forth herein, the PUD Amendment will meet the standards
and requirements of §4.00, gl q. of that Zoning Resolution.
9. The overall density of the development, under the terms and the conditions set forth
herein and pursuant to the provisions of §4.07.06 of the Garfield County Zoning
Resolution of 1978, as amended, will be no greater than an average density of 0 6
dwelling units per acre.
10. Subject to the conditions set forth below, all uses by right conditional uses
minimum lot areas, minimum lot coverage, minimum set -backs, maximum height
of buildings, and all other use and occupancy restrictions applicable to this PUD
Amendment are hereby approved by the Board of County Commissioners as set forth
in the zone text attached hereto and incorporated herein as Figure 1.
11. The PUD Amendment, subject to the conditions set forth herein, will be designed
with the consideration of the natural environment of the site and the surrounding
area, and will not unreasonably destroy or displace wildlife, natural vegetation, or
unique features of the site.
12. Subject to the provisions of §4.08.06 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of
1978, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners find that no portion of the
PUD Amendment conditionally approved herein may be occupied until appropriate
final plats have been approved by this Board.
13. The PUD Amendment is in conformance, or is compatible with the following:
Garfield County Subdivision Regulations; Garfield County Zoning Resolution;
Garfield County Comprehensive Plan; Garfield County road standards and policies;
Garfield County municipal comprehensive plans and municipal regulations, as
applicable; existing land uses in the surrounding area; and other applicable local,
state, and federal regulations, resolutions, plans, and policies.
Page 4 of 8
111111 11111 111111 111111 1111 111111 11111 111 111 1111 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P637 M ALSDORF
38 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
1111► ����►► iii 11111111111111111111111
546356,06/08/1999 03:43P 81133 P915 M ALSDORF
5 of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Garfield County, Colorado, that the Rose Ranch PUD Amendment is hereby approved subject to
compliance with all of the following specific conditions as listed below:
I. All
representations made by the Applicant at the Public Hearing an in the Application shall
be considered condi ons of a•nroval. unless specified otherwise . - Board inclu in,
not limited to. the following items listed below.
A. Information contained within the application:
See Figure 2 as modified to reflect the verbal representations of the applicant as approved
by the Board through motion.
B. All items indicated in the resolution of PUD conditional approval including the
following items listed below:
1. The design of the first final plat shall conform with the following:
a. grading shall not .be proposed or conducted on slopes greater than
thirty (30%) percent with the exception of the golf cart underpass
below CR 109, the water tank location, within limited areas of the
golf cart board walk, the water tank access road, and specified areas
within the golf course. These specified areas shall be subject to site
specific geotechnical analysis for County review.
b.
a minimum setback shall be established for buildings lots at one
hundred feet (100') from the mean high water mark of the Roaring
Fork River for all lots with the exception of the following seven (7)
lot: Lots 28, 63, 82, 83, 84, 85, and 86 which shall have minimum
setbacks ranging between seventy (70') feet and ninety (90') feet as
indicated in Figure 2.
c. a maximum building shall be set at a height of up to thirty-five (35')
feet in all areas except the following nine (9) Lots 23, 24, 25, 34, 35,
61, 62, 65, and 66 which shall have a building height restriction of
twenty-five (25') feet.
2. The first Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall provide a preliminary
plan for ten percent (10%) of the total housing units proposed as attainable
housing units to be located on the project site. The housing shall be created
to accommodate individuals who earn within 80% of the median income in
this valley with no more than 1/3 rd of their income spent on total housing
Page 5 of 8
111111 11111 1111111111111111111111 11111 111 111111111 111
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P638 M ALSDORF
39 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
ME
TIHIII Mil
546856 06/08/1999 03:43P B1133 P916 M ALSDORF
6 of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
costs. Price restricted lots do not conform with this condition of approval
which clearly states "housing units" which are "to be located on the project
site." The first ten (10) affordable housing units shall be built on site and
during the first plan phase. Ten affordable housing (10) units shall be built
per subsequent phases until all thirty (30) such units are built. Off-site
mitigation or cash -in -lieu may be a possibility for the 20 units, with a
corresponding reduction of the overall density of the PUD, should the
regulations be amended accordingly for affordable housing. No further
agreements shall be executed until such time as the affordable housing units
are constructed as required.
3. The covenant and the plat notes shall require xeriscape landscaping measures
for all proposed homes located on the unirrigated alluvial fan and collapsible
soils within the development as part of the covenants.
II. All items indicated in the staff report including the following items listed below.
A. PUD Deficiencies:
1. At the time of the first final plat, the PUD zone district text shall define
"home offices" and shall include home-based child care as a permitted use
within higher density zone districts. •
2. At the time of the first final plat, the provision that unused garden plot area
could be landscaped shall be removed and instead language shall allow the
placement of native lawn seed for these areas considered to be temporarily
not in use.
3. At the time of the first final plat, the land use breakdown, including total
area, number of lots, number of dwelling units, area of non-residential floor
space, dwelling units, off-street parking, and density shall be transferred to
the final plan sheet [Section 4.50.J].
4. At the time of each final plat submission, the site plan shall show the
location of the appropriate proportion of the affordable housing units per the
number of free market units contained within each phase [Sections 4.50.G
and 9.20].
III. PUD Amendments:
A. The following amendment requests have been granted to the applicant by the
Garfield County Board of Commissioners:
Page 6 of 8
1 inui 11111 111111 111111 uii 111111 11111 iii iini ilii 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P639 M ALSDORF
40 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
lE1il 111111111111 X1111111111111111! 1111111111111
5468E6 06/08/1999 03:43p 81133 P917 M ALSDORF
7 of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
1. Allow grading on slopes above thirty (30%) percent in specified areas which
include the golf cart underpass below CR 109, the water tank location,
f
within limited areas of the golf cart board walk, the water tank access road,
and specified areas within the golf course, for the Rose Ranch Amended
PUD. These specified areas shall be subject to site specific geotechnical
analysis for County review.
2. Allow planting of non-native landscaping in accordance with the Golf Course
Management Plan for the Rose Ranch Amended PUD.
3. Allow setbacks on specific buildings lots of between seventy (70') and ninety
(90') feet, as specified in Figure 2, from the mean high water mark of the
Roaring Fork River for the following seven (7) lots: 28, 63, 82, 83, 84, 85,
and 86 for the Rose Ranch Amended PUD.
4. Allow a maximum building height of up to thirty-five (35') feet in all areas
except the following specified nine (9) lots: 23, 24, 25, 34, 35, 61, 62, 65,
and 66, which shall have a building height restriction of twenty-five (25')
feet, for the Rose Ranch Amended PUD.
5. Allow a density increase from 292 units to 322 units with the condition that
the increase in thirty (30) units consist of ten (10) rent restricted rental units
within the newly designated Golf II Clubhouse Apartment Zone District and
twenty (20) deed restricted affordable housing units which are to be located
on the project site. Should the Garfield County Affordable Housing
Regulations be amended, the Board may approve an off-site location of the
the twenty (20) housing units.
Dated this 7th day of June, A.D. 1999 .
ATTEST;
C erk of the Bo id
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISS ! RS, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COL"' -"
Page 7 of 8
1111111 11111 111111 111111 1111 111111 11111 111 11111 1111 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P640 M ALSDORF
41 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
1111111K!II•IIlIII 11111111111111111111111 1111111111111
46856 06/08/1999 03:43P B1133 P918 M ALSDORF
of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
COMMTSSTnNER CHAIRMAN .TnHN F MARTTN
COMMISSIONER LARRY L. MCCOWN
COMMISSIONER WALTER A. STOWE
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss
County of Garfield )
, Aye
, Aye
, Aye
I, , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County
Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and
foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County
Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County,
at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 19
County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
Page 8 of 8
1111111 nisi nail iiiiium mill anuli unit Ilam
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P641 M ALSDORF
42 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
of 1
Land Use Summaryr
P.U.D.
1. RESIDENTIAL
PA1
PA2
PAS
PA4
PAS
PA6
PA7
PAS
PA9
PAID
PAI l
PA12
PAI)
PA14
PAIS
PAl6
PA17
PAIS
PA19
PA20
PA21
Golf II
SUBTOTAL:
2. ROADS
SUBTOTAL:
MIN. LOT SIZE
15,000 S.F.
20,000 S.F.
River Res. 1
20,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
River Res. 1
River Res. 2
15,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
20,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
15,000 S.F.
Duplex Lou
Club Homes
9,000 S.F.
Clubhouse Apartments
PUD Res.
UNITS ACRES % OF TOTAL
6 2.63
9 5.5
13 14.3
8 4.15
8 2.96
14 5.62
9 3.21
8 6.31
17 12.3
4 1.42
7 2.41
6 2.16
16 6.96
2 0.45
10 6.3
3 3.58
13 7.53
4 1.45
74 13.55
67 11.19
4 1.37
10
322 115.88 21.7%
3. COMMON OPEN SPACE
Community Park
Golf Course
Community Open Space
SUBTOTAL:
TOTAL ACREAGE
GROSS DENSITY
COMMERCIAL USE
(11MIAXIMUM)
RESIDENTIAL DATA
PLANNING AREA
PA 3, PA 8
PA9
PA2, PA 4, PAIS
PA 1, PA 5, PA 10, PA l2
PA13, PA17,PAIS
PA6, PA7, PA11, PA14, PA21
PA 19
PA 20
Golf
TOTAL
0.60 DU/AC
25,000 SQUARE FEET
MIN. LOT SIZE
River Res. 1
River Res. 2
20.000 S.F.
15,00 S.F.
9,000 S.F.
Duplex lots
Club Homes
Clubhouse Apartments
UNITS
21
17
27
70
36
74
67
10
322
ACRES % OF TOTAL
26.27 4.9%
ACRES % OF TOTAL
2.14 0.4%
222.18 41.3%
167.0 31.5%
391.35 73.4%
533.5 100.0%
ACRES
21.2
12.3
15.9
23.7
13.1
13.6
11.2
115.88
11"111 11111 111111 111111 1111 111111 111 11 111 111111 111 11 11
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P642 M ALSDORF
43 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Page 1 of 3
modified
Figure 2 PUD Res.
Rose Ranch PUD Amendment No. 1 Application
o Summary of Proposed Changes/Edits
--J
iii
s z 1. Addition of 10% on-site affordable housing (30 units)
- 10 units in the new Golf 11 Zone District
rn- CD
- 20 units in PA 20 (Golf Clubhomes)
ii a o This parcel has been enlarged by approximately 2.0 acres to accommodate the additional units. The
in el w acreage added to this parcel results in an approximate 2.0 acres removed from adjacent open space and golf
course tracts.
leo IIMI °°a The resulting total amount of allowed dwelling units for this amended PUD is 322 units — a density of 0.60
el ( dwelling units/acre.
INV' m
m
MI - m m 2. Changes related to addition of affordable housing units (Plan Exhibit):
i m o (1) edits to the Land Use Summary to include 30 additional units of affordable housing;
=a; m (2) approximately 2.0 acres added to the Clubhomes parcel (Planning Area 20) to allow 20 additional units;
MI 03m (3) reduction in open space and golf course tract acreage (approximately 2.0 acres) adjacent to Planning
1.0m ce
Area20;
— to(4) division of the Golf Course zoned parcel identified for location of the golf clubhouse into two parcels
NM to Golf Course (north) and Golf Course 11 (south - for inclusion of 10 affordable housing units);
-a co o (5) the secondary overlook has been deleted from the trail located west of County Road 109, and
— ▪ mr m (6) correction of the Common Open Space label located in the lower left hand portion of the plan -
_ informerly mislabeled as "Community" Open Space.
3. Changes related to addition of affordable housing units (Land Use Summary):
Updated Land Use Summary replaces the Land Use Summary included in Resolution 98-80. The Land
Use Summary included in Resolution 98-80 is the Land Use Summary for the approved Sketch Plan, not
the original PUD.
4. Changes related to addition of affordable housing units (Text):
Added Golf Course 1I Zone District
Text Edit: Totaling 113.91 115.88 acres, the residential development will be confined to approximately
21.49:i 21.7% of the site. The remainder of the site is designated for roadways (4.9%) and
Common Open Space (73.7'X, 73.4%). Within the Common Open Space Zone District, the
Golf Course comprises 41.8%, the Community Park comprises 0.4% and the Common Open
Space (General) comprises 3 I.5% of the total PUD Open-S,eee acreage.
Text Edit: 7. Club Homes Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership/rental with single family attached or
detached residential structures
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units; non -habitable accessory buildings and
structures; home offices; sales/marketing center; time-share or
fractional ownership units; rental units (20 maximum); public and
private roads; open space; trails; and utility and drainage easements;
community gardens
Text Edit: 8. Common Open Space Zone District
b. .Golf Course II
Intent: To provide an opportunity for recreational golf. To provide rental
residential units.
Permitted Uses: Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse facilities including-but-not.-
4imited-te pro shop, restaurant, lounge; driving range; golf related
activities; golf shelters; community greenhouse; golf course
maintenance and accessory facilities; community facilities; daycare center.
homeowners' association facilities; utilities; utilities access; caretaker's
residence and ren al residence units (10 maximum)
111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III 111111 III 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P643 M ALSDORF
44 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
te 2 ' of 3
aodified
Figure 2 PUD Res.
Text Edit: d. Common Open Space (General)
Permitted Uses: Useable open space; limited open space; community gardens;
community greenhouse; parking; trails; pedestrian linkages; golf cart
o
.. :n 0 paths; ponds; overlooks; drainage and utility easements; utilities:
uma >- utilities access; public fishing easement
u m - Chart Edit: F. Common Open Space Chart Amendment
=N Common open space. totaling 7:3.7'1'a73.4% of the site. will include several
w w a unique amenities. The common open space has been further subdivided into
N. � four categories defined by Garfield County including useable open space.
�� recreational open space. commercial open space and limited use open space.
M m a ( The following table summarizes Common Open Space (C.O.S.) acreages in
=M relation to PUD requirements:
n oam
▪ m m TypeAcres % of Project % of C.O.S.
w m o (533.5 Acres) (393.32 Acres)
� mm
7.
▪ ro Useable ;-8-4.8 77.51 -. -7 9'o =.
14.59-8°� 19.7%
• ■ m Recreational 2.14 0.4% 0.54'0
m Commercial =, -_ 222.2 4-14%41.6% 6. 56.5%
IICO'" Limited Use 89.5 16.39% 22.8%
:III r
goo
1tr re TOTAL 393.32 391.35 73.7% 73.4% 100%
.in qra
>age 3 of 3 not included
Minimum Required Common Open Space
Total Common Open Space Provided
133.38 Acres (25%)
:9€-.-;= 391.35 Acres (74=%
73.4%)
1 111111 11111 11I11111111I 1111 11111111111 111 111111111111
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P644 MAL
SDORF
45 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
11111 111111 11111111111111111111111111111 1111111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P645 M ALSDORF
46 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Applicability
To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations, as
amended, the Ironbridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zone District is divided
into the following zone district classifications:
• River Residential 1 Zone District
• (PA's 3 & 8)
• River Residential 2 Zone District
• (PA 9)
• 20,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA's 2, 4, & 15)
• 15,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
•(PA's 1, 5, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17&18)
• 9,000 Square Foot (Minimum) Residential Zone District
• (PA 6, 7,11,14,19, 21)
• Medium Density Residential Zone District
(PA 19 & 22)
• Club Villas Residential Zone District
• (PA 20)
• Common Open Space Zone District
• Golf Course
• Common Open Space (General)
Zoning Districts
1. River Residential 1 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached residential structures
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units; non -habitable accessory buildings and
structures; home offices; sales/marketing center; public and private roads; Private Open
Space Easements; open space; utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 0.70 acres
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 1
E:\WP Docs \2004\Tim\Gonbridge\Phase 1 Plat\Rose.Ranch.Zone. DistrictAmends.04.06.03.wpd
Exhibit
C
i iniii 11111 111111 111111 iui uiiii 11111 111 iiiiu 111 uii
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P646 M ALSDORF
47 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 175', except for lots which are narrower due to added depth
Minimum lot depth: 175', except for lots which are more shallow due to available depth
between road and wetland/boundary 30' from ordinary high watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front: 40' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 30' for lots less than 200' deep
Rear: 50' for lots that are a minimum of 200' deep; 25' for lots less than 200' deep
Side: 30' for lots 200' minimum width; 25' for lots less than 200' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each primary
residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes varying from the above described setbacks may be finalized
at the time of final subdivision platting.
2. River Residential 2 Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached residential structures.
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units; non -habitable accessory buildings and
structures; home offices; sales/marketing center; public and private roads; Private Open
Space Easements; open space; utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 0.50 acres
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 100'
Minimum lot depth: 175', except for lots which are more shallow due to available depth
between road and wetland/boundary 30' from ordinary high watermark
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front: 35' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots less than 175' deep
Rear: 50' for lots that are a minimum of 175' deep; 25' for lots less than 175' deep
Side: 30' for lots 150' minimum width; 20' for lots less than 150' in width
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each primary
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 2
E.\WP Docs\2004\Tim\Ironbridge\Phase 1 Plat\Rose.Ranch.Zone.District.Amends. 04.06.03. wpd
1 11111 11111 111111 111111 uii iuui iiui iii iuiii 111 uii
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P647 M ALSDORF
48 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes varying from the above described setbacks may be finalized
at the time of final subdivision platting
3. 20,000 Square Foot Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached residential structures.
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units;; non -habitable accessory buildings and
structures; home offices; sales/marketing center; public and private roads; open space;
and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 80', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 150'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front: 30'
Rear: 20'
Side: 10'
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each primary
residential structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
4. 15,000 Square Foot Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached residential structures.
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units;; non -habitable accessory buildings and
structures; home offices; sales/marketing center; public and private roads; open space;
and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 15,000 square feet
Minimum lot width: 80', measured at front building line
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 3
E'.\WP Docs\2004\Tim\Ironbridge\Phase I Plat\Rose.Ranch.Zone.District.Amends.04.06. 03 wpd
uniii 11111 11111 111111 iuunuuinuii 111111 III 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P648 M ALSDORF
49 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Minimum lot depth: 120'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front: 30'
Rear: 20'
Side: 10
Parking: A minimum of 4 off street parking spaces must be provided for each primary
structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
5. 9,000 Square foot Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot ownership with single family detached residential structures and
Affordable For -Sale Residential Dwelling Units.
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units; deed restricted single family residential units
complying with the requirements of the Garfield County Affordable Housing Regulations and
Guidelines. (Sections 4.07.15.01 and 4.14, Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as
amended); non -habitable accessory buildings and structures; home office;
sales/marketing center; public and private roads; open space; and utility and drainage
easements
Minimum lot size: 9,000 square feet
Minimum lot width: 175', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth: 90'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front: 25'
Rear: 20'
Side: 10'
Parking: A minimum of 2 off street parking spaces must be provided for each primary
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 4
E:\WP Docs\2004\Tim\Ironbridge\Phase 1 Plat \Rose.Ranch.Zone.District.Amends.04.06.03.wpd
1111111 11111 111111 1111111111111111111111111111 1111111
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P 61565 P649 M ALSDORF
50 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
structure; this requirement may be satisfied by the garage and/or driveway.
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
6. Medium Density Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with single family/multi-family residential
structures and Affordable For -Sale Residential Dwelling Units.
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units; multi -family residential units; deed
restricted single family residential units complying with the requirements of the Garfield County
Affordable Housing Regulations and Guidelines. (Sections 4.07.15.01 and 4.14, Garfield County
Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended); attached and detached non -habitable accessory
buildings and structures; home office; sales/marketing center; time share or fractional
ownership units; public and private roads; recreational facilities; open space; and utility
and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 4,000 sq. feet for detached units; no minimum lot size for attached
units — common ownership of open areas including parking areas within this zone is
permitted.
Minimum lot width (detached): 35', measured at front building line
Minimum lot depth (detached): 50'
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum setbacks from lot lines:
Single Family
Front: 20'
Rear: 15'
Side: 5'
Multi -Family
Front: 15' from street
Rear: 15'
Side: 0' with 10' minimum between primary structures, excluding attached units
Parking: A minimum of 2 parking spaces must be provided for each primary structure;
this requirement may be satisfied by garage, driveway, on -street parking and/or
common parking area.
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 5
E:\WP Does \2004\TimUronbridge\Phase 1 Plat\Rose.Ranch.Zone. District.Amends.04. 06.03.wpd
1 111111 11111 111111 111111 ilii mill 11111 111 111111 111 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P650 M ALSDORF
51 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Other: Building envelopes shall be finalized at time of subdivision.
7. Club Villas Residential Zone District
Intent: Individual lot and unit ownership with single family residential structures and
Affordable For -Sale Residential Dwelling Units.
Permitted Uses: Single-family residential units attached or detached; deed restricted
single family residential units complying with the requirements of the Garfield County
Affordable Housing Regulations and Guidelines. (Sections 4.07.15.01 and 4.14, Garfield County
Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended); non -habitable accessory buildings and structures;
home offices; sales/marketing center; time-share or fractional ownership units; public
and private roads; open space; trails; and utility and drainage easements
Minimum lot size: 4,000 square feet for detached units; no minimum lots size for
attached units — common ownership of open areas within this zone district is permitted
Maximum Gross Density:8 dwelling units/acre
Minimum Gross Density: 4.0 dwelling units/acre
Maximum building height: 35'
Minimum lot width: 35' for detached units; no minimum lot width for attached units
Minimum lot depth: 50' for detached units; no minimum lot depth for attached units
Minimum primary building setbacks:
Front: 15' from street
Rear: 15'
Side: 0' with 10' minimum between primary structures, excluding attached units
Parking: A minimum of 2 parking spaces must be provided for each primary structure;
this requirement may be satisfied by garage, driveway, on -street parking and/or
common parking area.
8. Common Open Space Zone District
Intent: To provide a hierarchy of privately owned open space, both developed and
undeveloped.
a. Golf Course
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 6
E:\WP Docs\2004\Tim\Ironbridge\Phase 1 Plat \Rose.Ranch.Zone.District.Amends.04.06.03.wpd
11111111111111111111111111I1111111111111111111111
647544 03/02/2004 03.49P B1565 P651 M PLSDORF
52 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Intent: To provide an opportunity for recreational golf.
Permitted Uses: Recreational golf course; golf clubhouse facilities including but not
limited to pro shop, restaurant; lounge; driving range; golf related activities; golf
shelters; golf course maintenance and accessory facilities; tennis; swimming pool; volley
ball; health/fitness center; utilities; utilities access
Maximum structure height: 35' restricted to golf course clubhouse and health/fitness
center building; other structures limited to maximum height of 25'
Maximum structure height (utilities): 35', restricted to water storage tank; other
structures limited to maximum height of 25'
Minimum building setbacks:
To County Road 109: 30'
To any adjacent residential use: 20'
Other: Golf course acreage will be finalized during platting; golf course may be
parcelized / platted for ownership purposes
b. Common Open Space (General)
Intent: To provide open areas for recreation, visual relief; buffering and wildlife habitat
Permitted Uses: Useable open space, limited open space; community gardens; parking;
trails; pedestrian linkages; golf cart paths; ponds; overlooks; drainage and utility
easements; utilities; utilities access; public fishing easement
Maximum structure height (utilities): 35', restricted to water storage tank; other
structures limited to maximum height of 25'
Other: It is anticipated that one community water system storage facility will be built in
the upper valley, West of County Road 109. This facility will be non-detectable from
County Road 109 and accessible by means of a maintenance access path.
deed restricted single family residential units complying with the requirements of the Garfield
County Affordable Housing Regulations and Guidelines. (Sections 4.07.15.01 and 4.14, Garfield
County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended)
Ironbridge PUD Zoning Text
Page 7
E:\WP Docs12004\Tim Uronbridge\Phase 1 Plat\Rose.Ranch.Zone.District.Amends.04.06.03.wpd
i iuui nisi olio iuui iui iuui iim ui iuuii ii uii
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P652 M ALSDORF
53 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
ROSE RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PHASING PLAN
Phase'
1999-2002
2003-2005
2005-2008
2006-2010
Phase 1
Lots 90-171
Golf Course
X
Phase 2
PA's 20, 22 and
7-9
X
Phase 3
PA's l-6 and 21
X
Phase 4
PA 19
X
Exhibit
D
' In order to address market conditions, Applicant reserves the right to reallocate among
future phases the Planning Areas (PA's) hereinabove set forth.
I nal nui mill mill uu IIIlI 11111 II IIIIII a uu
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P 81565 P653 M ALSDORF
54 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Existing PUD Map
Existing Prelim. Plan/Phase
1Final Plat
Revised PUD Map/Prelim.
Plan/Phase 1 Final Plat
Road A
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road B
Blue Heron Way
Silver Mountain Drive
Road C
Bear Grass Road/Blue Heron
Way/Wild Rose Circle
Wild Rose Drive/Wild Rose
Court
Road D
White Peaks Lane
White Peaks Land
Road E
Meadow Sage Road/Gamble
Oak Circle
N/A
Road F
Meadow Sage Road
N/A
Road G
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road H
River Edge Lane
River Bend Way
Road I
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road J
Tamora Drive
Irornbridge Drive
Road K
Big Wing Drive
Meadow Sage Road
Road L
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road M
River Edge Road
River Bend Way
Road N
Red Bluff Circle
Red Bluff Court
Road 0
Long Shadow Lane
Gamble Oak Lane
Exhibit
E
El,
Nce
mi.0 o At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County,
a } Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, in
E z Glenwood Springs on Monday, the 6th day of October, 2003, there were present:
amino
i. a o John Martin , Commissioner Chairman
a w Larry McCown , Commissioner
mTresi Houpt , Commissioner
- n. a Don DeFord , County Attorney
CO111 0 Mildred Alsdorf , Clerk of the Board
0 • •Ed Green , County Manager
011 GEsc
011
IIMI/N m when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit:
•
-Nm
00=1 0
Ce RESOLUTION NO. 2004- 21
(9
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
)ss
1111111 11111 11111 11111 111 111111111111 III 111111►111111
646388 02/11/2004 11:20A 81560 P438 M ALSDORF
1 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
M MEM N
A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN
_
r o FOR IRONBRIDGE (FORMERLY "ROSE RANCH") PUD
ct
�U)
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado,
("Board") received an application for Preliminary Plan ("Application") from LB Rose Ranch
LLC. ("Applicant");
WHEREAS, Preliminary Plan Subdivision approval was previously granted for the
Ironbridge PUD (formerly the Rose Ranch PUD Property and hereinafter the "Property"),
pursuant to Board Resolution No. 99-068 ("Original Preliminary Plan");
WHEREAS, in the course of constructing the public and other improvements within the
Property, Applicant experienced on-site conditions which precluded the construction of said
improvements in strict conformity with Original Preliminary Plan;
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Applicant's application for PUD Amendment,
which the application was approved on date even herewith pursuant to Board Resolution No.
, Applicant made request under the Application for additional changes to the
Original Preliminary Plan to confoini said approval to the physical layout of the Property and
present market conditions;
WHEREAS, on the 7th day of July, 2003, the Application was referred by the Board to
the Garfield County Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") for review;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 13th day of August,
2003, upon the question of whether the Planning Commission should recommend approval or
denial of the Application, at which hearing the public and interested parties were given the
opportunity to express their opinions relative to said recommendation;
Plan\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan
EXHIBIT
=NOM ceIMO�
0
N
— ct 0
U
IMO�
OMNI >-
0)
Z
1-
Sao
0
oto o
=mow
MIN
—m'-.
oma
Nth
MSG
G G WHEREAS, the Board on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the
men N m aforementioned hearing, has made the following determination of facts:
mon G
•
Imo ®� 1. That proper posting and public notice was provided, as required, for the hearing before
co r- the Board;
WHEREAS, following close of the public hearing and on the basis of substantial
evidence introduced therein, the Planning Commission made recommendation to the Board that
the Application be approved;
WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on the 6th day of October, 2003, upon the
question of whether the above described Preliminary Plan should be granted or denied, at which
hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions
relative to said approval or denial;
WHEREAS, the Board closed the public hearing on the 6th day of October, 2003, to
make a final decision; and
2. That the hearing before the Board was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts,
matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at said
hearing;
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed subdivision as set forth within
the Application is in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County;
4. That the proposed subdivision as set forth within the Application is in conformance with
the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended;
5. That the application is in conformance with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations
of 1984, as amended; and
6. That the application is in conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of
2000, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Garfield County, Colorado, that based on determination of facts set forth above, the Application
for Preliminary Plan for Ironbridge PUD be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the Application, and at the public
hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board, shall be conditions of approval, unless
specifically altered by the Board.
2. That all terms, conditions and provisions of Resolution No. 99-068 (Exhibit A) which are
not modified or altered by the conditions of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.
3. That Applicant shall maintain all drainage structures in accordance with the provision and
requirements of the Drainage Report prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc. dated April 3,
Plan\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan 2
1111111 11111 111111111111111111111111111111 1111111 111111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P655 M ALSDORF
56 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
2003.
4. That Applicant shall include within and dedicate under the first final plat filed in
conformance with this approved Preliminary Plan ("Final Plat") the relocated Regional Trail as
set forth and described within this Preliminary Plan.
5. That prior to the filing of the Final Plat, Applicant shall contact the Colorado Department
of Health and Environment and the Garfield County Vegetation Manager to determine the
oappropriate procedures for the storage of pesticides, fertilizers and other hazardous materials on
site so as not to adversely impact the domestic water wells serving the Westbank Ranch
min a 0 Subdivision.
M >-
GI
Z 6. The Applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the Garfield County Vegetation
1111=1 CL 0 Manager set forth in his correspondence of July 31, 2003, and September 22, 2003, as follows:
MI= co0
MEN m a. The tree inventory of 1997 indicates the presence of hundreds of Russian olives on the
mum m cc roperty. Russian olive has been designated a noxious weed in Garfield County since
`" " 2000. Prior to the filing of the Final Plat, Applicant shall submit a plan that provides for
the control of Russian olive with the Property;
Nb. There have been reports, although not confirmed, that there may be some Tamarisk trees
N m located along the east side of the Property along the Roaring Fork River. Applicant shall
No=m inventory the area within the Property for Tamarisk, and provide a Tamarisk management
.�. r plan if the plant is present. Tamarisk is classified as a noxious weed in Garfield County;
CO
co
NMI C° c. The Russian knapweed, salt cedar, and Russian olive on the Property should be treated by
the fall of 2003. Applicant shall treat these 3 species prior to November and provide the
County with copies of the treatment applications by November 1, 2003. Treatment may
be in the form of application records by a commercial applicator. The remaining weed
species, Canada thistle, Oxeye daisy and Scotch thistle shall be treated in the spring. The
Applicant shall provide a weed management plan for spring treatment of oxeye daisy and
Scotch thistle. The plan shall also provide for a follow-up treatment in 2004 of Russian
knapweed,' Russian olive and salt cedar;
d. Applicant shall remove the tumbleweeds that have established on the road cuts along
County Road 109 either mechanically or manually prior to November 2003;
e. Tall grass between the golf course and private yards shall be mowed and trimmed for a
seamless transition; and
f. Applicant shall provide copies of the records to the Building and Planning Department
and the County Vegetation Management Department of reseeding of the sewer line at
Telfer Springs upon completion.
7. All maintenance vehicles and vehicles associated with the Property and utilizing roads
that are maintained by the West Bank Homeowners Association but which are dedicated to the
County shall be licensed prior to the filing of this Resolution. Applicant shall work with the
Garfield County Sheriffs Department and the Garfield County Clerk and Recorders Office to
determine which vehicles to be licensed.
Plan\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan 3
1 IIII "III 1 11111 11'I'VIII IIII 11111 111 1111111 11 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P656 M ALSDORF
57 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
646388 02/11/2004 11:20A B1560 P441 M ALSDORF
4 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
8. All references contained with subdivision documents, including but not limited to all
plats, protective covenants and deeds shall be changed to Ironbridge PUD. All approvals,
documentations and representations heretofore issued to and made in the name of Rose Ranch
PUD shall pertain to Ironbridge PUD.
9. All conditions heretofore established by the Board under Resolution No. 99-068, shall
remain in full force and effect except to the extent said conditions are modified under the
following conditions of approval, to wit:1 be permitted unless otherwise specified within these
conditions of approval:
a. Preliminary Plan Sheet 1 of 8 - Lot area modifications for Lots 16, 77, 78, 79, 105
and 171 and addition of Lot 79a (under this approval now denominated as Lot 79b)
with corresponding deletion of Lot 62 to maintain the total number of lots at 292;
b. Preliminary Plan Sheet 2 of 8 - Enlargement of the Westbank underpass easement to
allow for grading and revisions to underpass material and orientation; relocation of
sections of the Robertson Ditch easement to straighten the ditch and allow the ditch to
work with golf course grading; lot line adjustment to Golf Parcel adjacent to Block 3
to allow new routing of golf hole; movement of water tank easement up hill to satisfy
Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District elevation requirements; relocation of
Regional Trail; creation of river access corridor (15 foot width) between Lots 15 and
16;
c. Preliminary Plan Sheet 3 of 8 — Additional specifications addressing englargement of
Westbank underpass;
d. Preliminary Plan Sheet 4 of 8 — Additional specifications addressing modifications to
Robertson Ditch and Westbank underpass; termination of Regional Trail at the
intersection of Road M Road;
e. Preliminary Plan Sheet 5 of 8 — Additional specifications addressing addition of Lot
79(a) and 79(b), modifications to Robertson Ditch and Lots 77, 78 and 79 and
property line adjustments to Golf Parcel and Block 3;
f. Preliminary Plan Sheet 6 of 8 — Additional specifications addressing modifications to
Robertson Ditch and Regional Trail;
g.
Preliminary Plan Sheet 7 of 8 — Additional specifications addressing modifications to
Regional Trail and new easement to Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District;
h. Preliminary Plan Sheet 10 of 77 (Grading & Drainage Plan) — additional
specifications addressing water tank and access road relocation, relocation and
construction of Regional Trail and modifications to golf course; modifications to
southernmost underpass increasing width from 10' to 12' and length from 90' to 190'
and modifications to intersection of County Road 109 and River Bend Way
1 All Plan Sheet references are to Preliminary Plan drawings prepared by High Country Engineering as contained
within the Application and filed with the Garfield County Department of Building and Planning
P1an\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan
1111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 11/111/11 1111
647544 03/02/2004 03.49P 81565 P657 M ALSDORF
58 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
4
addressing reduced intersection width;
Preliminary Plan Sheet 11 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing modification
0 of lot areas for Lots 105 and 171; removal of culvert #7 due to relocation of Pond B
(See also item j) and piping of segments of Robertson Ditch;
¢o
N H
"z
d cs0
J•
Preliminary Plan Sheet 12 of 77 — Relocation of culverts crossing County Road 109
in accordance with County Road and Bridge direction; removal of retaining wall and
piping of Robertson Ditch west of Road H; new location of Pond B; elimination of
Pond G and elimination of golf cart underpass at County Road 109 to reflect re-
routing of golf course;
k. Preliminary Plan Sheet 13 of 77 — Additional specifications regarding modifications
to Robertson Ditch;
1. Preliminary Plan Sheet 14 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing piping of
Robertson Ditch, golf course grading, relocation of County Road 109 culvert and
property line revisions to Golf Parcel and Lots 77, 78, 79 (now 79a) and 79a (now
79b); removal of culvert 18a and elimination of pond c; revision of culvert 17;
m. Preliminary Plan Sheet 15 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing modifications
to golf course grading and Robertson Ditch;
n. Preliminary Plan Sheet 16 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing 15' wide
access corridor created between lots 15 & 16, golf course grading, modifications to
Robertson Ditch and Westbank underpass; elimination of Pond D, and modification
of ponds E and H;
o. Preliminary Plan Sheet 17 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing modifications
to water tank site, golf course grading and County Road 109 underpass;
Preliminary Plan Sheet 18 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing removal of
County Road 109 underpass, relocation of County Road 109 culverts and golf course
grading modifications;
P.
q.
Preliminary Plan Sheet 19 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing modifications
to County Road 109 underpass extending from ravine, said changes including grading
changes, orientation to ravine and construction material changes;
r. Preliminary Plan Sheets 20, 21 — Modifications to debris flow structures as further
detailed within Sheet 67 of 77; changes to grading, construction materials and
structure orientation; additional specifications addressing golf course grading;
s. Preliminary Plan Sheet 40 of 77 — Additional specifications addressing relocated
water tank, relocated access road and drain pipe; PRV relocation as required by
Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District;
t. Preliminary Plan Sheet 41 of 77 — PRV location changes and minor utility location
Plan\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan 5
1111111 11111 111111 1111111111 111111 111111111111111111111
647544 03/02/2004 03 49P B1565 P658 M ALSDORF
59 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
111111111111111111 111111 111 1111111 11111 111 11111 1111
646388 02/11/2004 11:20A B1560 P443 M ALSDORF
changes; 6 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
u. Preliminary Plan. Sheet 42-44 of 77 — Relocation of sewer force main from west to
east side of road;
v. Preliminary Plan Sheet 45 and 46 of 77 — Water treatment plant site changes as
required by Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District and the elimination of it on
golf course;
w. Preliminary Plan Sheet 64-65 of 77 - Replaced by Smith and Loveless Inc. drawing of
7-15-99 as required by Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District;
x. Preliminary Plan Sheet 67 of 77 — Debris structure detail changes resulting from
change in construction materials from wood to earth, additional specifications
addressing Regional Trail construction specifications (Change 6" asphalt to 4");
Preliminary Plan Sheet 68 of 77 — PRV detail modifications and sample tap detail
modifications as required by Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District;
y.
z. Preliminary Plan Sheet 68a and 68b — Lift station building modifications;
aa. Preliminary Plan Sheet 69 of 77 — Modifications to Water and Sewer Main Notes and
details as required by Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District;
bb. Preliminary Plan Sheet 75 of 77 —as built golf course grading;
cc. Preliminary Plan Sheet 76 of 77 — Relocation of Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation
District water line to west side of County Road 109;
dd. All matters addressed in the report entitled, DRAINAGE REPORT, ROSE RANCH
P.U.D., prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc. on April 03, 2003 and including
the change from wooden boardwalk cart path to cement path with spanning bridges;
ee. All matters addressed in technical review prepared by Resource Engineering, Inc
(Michael Erion) as set forth in Erion correspondence of August 01, 2003.
10. In accordance with the US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service letter dated
August 7, 2003, the Applicant shall in late 2003 or early winter or spring 2004 provide the Fish
and Wildlife Service documentation regarding the monitoring for the presence and nesting
behavior of the bald eagles. The monitoring shall be carried out in cooperation with the Fish and
Wildlife Service and/or the Colorado Department of Wildlife. Shall the bald eagle return, the
Applicant will enter into a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), and the Service will determine the
adequacy of existing mitigation measures agreed to and implemented by the Applicant, and
determine if other potential measures are appropriate. Prior to the approval of the 2nd Phase of
the Ironbridge PUD, the Applicant shall provide documentation regarding the monitoring of the
bald eagles and the determination of the Fish and Wildlife Service with respect to the HCP.
Plan\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan
1111111 Hill 111111 111111 1111 111111 11111 111 1111111 111111
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P B1565 P659 M ALSDORF
60 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
11. An equipment storage facility shall be completed on the Ironbridge side of County Road
109 to minimize traffic in Westbank. The equipment storage facility shall be completed in
conjunction with the construction of the Athletic Center.
Dated this 9th day of Feb. , A.D. 2003.
• A E:ST:
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COL
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foreg Resp cion was adop -d by the following
vote:
John Martin
Larry McCown
Tresi Houpt
, Aye
, Aye
, Aye
STATE OF COLORADO
)ss
County of Garfield
I, , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of
County Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the
annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the
Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said
County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 2003
County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
1 111111 11111 111111 111111 iiia iuiii iiui 111 iuiiu ii ini
647544 03/02/2004 03:49P 61565 P660 M ALSDORF
61 of 75 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
Plan\Rose Ranch\ironbridge Prelim Plan 7
111111111111111111111111 III 111111111111 III 11111 lilt 1111
646388 02/11/2004 11201 81560 P444 M ALSDORF
7 ..0 T D 01 0101 A /r 011 cnocrL-r nnwry wi.