HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 PC Staff Report 07.13.2016Planning Commission - July 13, 2016
Exhibits - Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District Service Plan Amendment
Exhibit,
L6tter r
/:,,rt,l./.tl/l://,tt:1t/,.,,,,,L
LKL6IZI':
"1,::,1;:;llt;
A Colorado Revised Statutes
B Application
c Staff Report
D Daft Resolution , -,t
E VfHt*hrt'ttP*ti,twAilw
F ' ,l I
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
EXHBTT
C
REQUEST
PROPERTY OWNER
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCATION
EXISTING ZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission July 13, 2016
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Service Plan Amendment Review and Recommendation
Various
Louis Meyer - SGM Engineering
South of the City of Glenwood Springs between SH 82 and
the Roaring Fork River at CR 154
PUD and Suburban
Urban Growth Area, Residential Medium Density,
Floodplain, City of Glenwood Springs Area of lnfluence
!. BACKGROUND
Special districts are quasi-municipal corporations and political subdivisions that are organized to act for a
particular purpose. The Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District (RFWSD) was approved as water and
sanitation district in 1994 as Aspen Glen Water & Sanitation District. A subsequent name change and
change to a regional service provider has occurred since that time. RFWSD requests an amendment to
their district service boundary in order to provide water and wastewater services to properties north of
lronbridge, including Eastbank.
An amendment to a special district entails obtaining review and approval from the local governmental
jurisdiction. The Garfield County 2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended does not contain
specific provisions related to the review of service plans or amendments therefore the process of
submittal and review of the plans must be in compliance with statutory requirements contained in Title
32 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. Those statutory requirements include submittal of the service plans
to the clerk for the board of county commissioners, referral of the plans to the planning commission for
review and recommendation to the board within thirty (30) days of plan submittal, and a public hearing
with the board to be held not more than thirty (30) days after setting the public hearing date.
II. GENERAT INFORMATION
The Clerk and Recorder (Jean Alberico) received petition for review of a service plan amendment for the
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District on June 20,2OLG and a public meeting was set with the Board
of County Commissioners (the Board) on July 5,2016. At that meeting the Board discussed the review
process for the plan and joined in the referral to the Commission for review and recommendation. The
public hearing required for Board review is to be scheduled at a public meeting to be held at least ten (10)
days after receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation. The public hearing must then occur
within thirty (30) days of that meeting. Should a recommendation be issued by the Planning Commission
on July L3,2OL3, and a resolution to memorialize that recommendation completed, a public meeting will
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission July 13, 2016
scheduled on August 75,20L6 with the Board of County Commissioners with an anticipated public hearing
date on September 6,2016.
PLAN DESCRIPTION
The purpose of amending the service plan is to expand the existing boundaries of the District by
approximately 170 acres. As shown in Figure 1-, above, the current boundary encompasses an area from
lronbridge at the northern end of the district to Coryell Ranch at the south end. East to west the District
ilt.
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission July 13, 2015
encompasses River Edge PUD up to SH 82 and west to the hillside on the west side of CR 109. The District
boundaries do not include Westbank or Westbank Ranch.
RFWSD seeks to expand the boundary to the north of lronbridge along CR L09 to CR 154 and the area
known as Eastbank, including Orrison Distributing and Jammaron property. This expansion is based upon
a pre-inclusion agreement between RFWSD and the Roaring Fork RE-1 School District regarding service to
the Eastbank School site. The red dotted line on the drawing below indicates that area to be included in
the District boundaries.
i{ t
Potable Water - RFWSD has submitted information regarding the District's existing potable water service
infrastructure, including five (5) water wells, treatment facilities, storage tanks, transmission and
distribution lines as well as appurtenant facilities. The water wells have an existing capacity of 1,820
* - , FiE.l htl;?tr
[--*l r:r wsn " f1,su{r Boshitry
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission July 13, 20L6
gallons per minute (GPM) and a full capacity of 3,340 GPM. There are also 4 additional locations within
Aspen Glen for water wells, and 11 additional locations within Coryell Ranch for future water supplies.
RFWSD currently owns and operates four water storage tanks with a total capacity of capacity 1.5 million
gallons of water. Existing capacities appear to be sufficient to provide services to the school facilities.
Wastewater - lnformation has been submitted regarding existing regional wastewater facilities managed
by RFWSD including the wastewater treatment plant located along the Roaring Fork River at Aspen Glen
(below the gravel pit). This plant has a capacity of 0.107 million gallons per day (MCD) with planned
phases allowing for 0.321 MGD per day at build out. Conveyance of wastewater includes numerous lift
stations and force mains necessary to provide adequate flow from areas within the District to the
wastewater treatment plant. Currently five (5) lifts stations exist within the district.
The School District and RFWSD entered into a Pre-lnclusion Agreement for the provision of wastewater
services equaling 70 EQR's. This includes the two proposed school as well as 16 units for possible future
affordable housing at the site. The provision of service to School District expanded service will require
the construction of additional infrastructure including a lift station and force mains along CR 109,
Hardwick Bridge, and CR 154. RFWSD will utilize 80 EQR's for utility sizing criteria for the infrastructure.
Additional properties included in the Expanded Service area include those sites adjacent to the School
District parcel. lt has been determined that potential future development of this area may resulting up
to 285 EQR's.
The expansion area includes those properties
located north and west of the lronbridge PUD as
shown in Figure 3, left. The blue highlighted
parcel is the site of the RE-1 school. Area zoning
is primarily Ruralto the north and west. The SH
82 corridor is to the east. The residential
community of West Bank is to the south and not
proposed to be located in the District boundary.
The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan
designates the Eastbank area and north as Urban
Growth Area for the City of Glenwood Springs.
The FLUM for areas east and west are Residential
Medium Density as shown in Figure 4, below.Figure3-ZoningMap
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission July 13, 2015
Figure 4 - Futilr€ lanel {,.}su Map
Other designations on the FLUM include Greenway Trail (blue dotted line) and Floodplain for the
Roaring Fork River.
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission July 13, 20L6
Plan Element for Water and Sanitation, Section 7:
ir riit r -.1 :, l'r' r::i.t i: llr* i f;.f-ittrIr,r.; :',., r itt
VI. REVIEW CRITERIA
Based upon State Statute, the following section provides the review criteria to be
considered:
32-1-203. Action on service plan - criteria
(1) The board of county commissioners of each county which has territory included
within the proposed special district, other than a proposed special district which is
contained entirely within the boundaries of a municipality, shall constitute the
approving authority under this part 2 and shall review any service plan filed by the
petitioners of any proposed special district. With reference to the review of any
service plan, the board of county commissioners has the following authority:
(a) fo approve without condition or modification the service plan submitted;
(b) To disapprove the service plan submitted;
(c) To conditionally approve the service plan subject to the submission of additional
6
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission JulY 13, 2015
information relating to or the modification of the proposed service plan.
(2) The board of county commissioners shall disapprove the service plan unless
evidence satisfactory to the board of each of the following is presented:
(a) There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to
be serviced by the proposed special district.
Staff Comment: The application has adequately demonstrated that there is sufficient
need for expansion of the District boundary.
(b) The existing service in the area to be served by the proposed special district is
inadequate for present and projected needs.
Staff Comment: There is no water and sanitation service available to the area
proposed to be located within the RFWDS boundary.
(c) The proposed special district is capable of providing economical and sufficient
service to the area within its proposed boundaries.
Staff Comment: The District has sufficiently demonstrated that it is capable of
providing economical and sufficient service to the area.
(d) The area to be included in the proposed special district has, or will have, the
financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis.
Staff Comment: The application included sufficient information related to
indebtedness.
(2.5) The board of county commissioners may disapprove the service plan if
evidence satisfactory to the board of any of the following, at the discretion of the
board, is not presented:
(a) Adequate service is not, or will not be, available to the area through the county
or other existing municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, including existing special
districts, within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis.
(b) The facility and service standards of the proposed special district are compatible
with the facility and service standards of each county within which the proposed
special district is to be located and each municipality which is an interested party
under section 32-l-2O4 (L).
(c) The proposal is in substantial compliance with a master plan adopted pursuant to
section 30-28-106, C.R.S.
(d) The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted county, regional, or state
long-range water quality management plan for the area.
Service Plan Amendment
Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District
Planning Commission JulY 13, 2016
(e) The creation of the proposed special district will be in the best interests of the
area proposed to be served.
(3) The board of county commissioners may conditionally approve the service plan of
a proposed special district upon satisfactory evidence that it does not comply with
one or more of the criteria enumerated in subsection (2) of this section. Final
approval shall be contingent upon modification of the service plan to include such
changes or additional information as shall be specifically stated in the findings of the
board of county commissioners.
(3.5) (a) The board of county commissioners may exclude territory from a proposed
special district prior to approval of the service plan submitted by the petitioners of a
proposed special district. The petitioners shall have the burden of proving that the
exclusion of the property is not in the best interests of the proposed special district.
Any person owning property in the proposed special district who requests that his or
her property be excluded from the special district prior to approval of the service
ptan shall submit the request to the board of county commissioners no later than ten
days prior to the hearing held under section 32-L-2O4, but the board of county
commissioners shall not be limited in its action with respect to exclusion of territory
based upon the request. Any request for exclusion shall be acted upon before final
action of the county commissioners under section 32-t-2O5.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (3.5), if the
service plan submitted by the petitioners of a proposed special district is for a health
service district or health assurance district, the board of county commissioners shall
not accept or act upon the request of a person owning property in the proposed
special district that his or her property be excluded from the special district.
(4) The findings of the board of county commissioners shall be based solely upon the
service plan and evidence presented at the hearing by the petitioners, planning
commission, and any interested party.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed Service Plan Amendment and
authorize the Chair to sign the proposed resolution to forward to the Board of County Commissioners.
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Garfield
At a regular meeting of the Planning Commission for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the
Commissioners'Meeting Room, Garfield County Administration Building, in Glenwood Springs on
Wednesday the 25m day of July A.D. 2012, there were present:
Bob Fullerton , Commission Chairman
Keith Lammey , Commissioner Vice-Chair
Steohen Damm , Commissioner Secretary
Eric Rudd , Commissioner
Greg McKennis , Commissioner
Kasev Nisnel , Commissioner
Michelle Foster , Commissioner
Michael Sullivan , Commissioner
lce Damuth , Associate Commissioner
Matt Langhorst , Associate Commissioner
Steve Kvle , Associate Commissioner
Kellv Cave , Assistant County Attorney
Becky Wheelersburg , Clerk to the Commission
when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 2016-_
A RESOLUTION TO MEMORIALIZE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE
SERVICE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE ROARING FORK WATER AND
SANITATION DISTRICT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PARCEL NO#
Recitals
Garfield County is a legal and political subdivision of the State of Colorado, for which the
Board of County Commissioners is authorized to act.
Pursuant to law, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County (the "Board") has
appointed the Garfield County Planning Commission (the "Commission")'
)
)ss
)
B.
C.On June 20,2016 a service plan amendment for the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation
District was submitted in Garfield County, Colorado to the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield
County, Colorado, ex-officio Clerk to the Garfield Board of County Commissioners, for the
Board's consideration in accordance with the Colorado Revised Statutes, 932-l-20t et. seq.,
the Colorado Special District Act, and the required processing fees were paid at that time;
The Board discussed the review schedule for the service plans at a public meeting held on
July 11,2013, at which time it joined in the Clerk's required referral to the Commission.
Pursuant to C.R.S. *32 -l-204 (2)(a) the county planning commission shall study such
service plan and present its recommendations consistent with this pmt 2 to the board of
county commissioners within thirty days following the filing of the service plan with the
county clerk and recorder.
In accordance with state law, the Planning Commission has adopted a comprehensive plan,
currently the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030, as amended.
The Commission conducted a public meeting on July 13,2016 upon the question of whether
the service plan meets the required and discretionary criteria contained in C.R.S. *32-l-203
and to make a recommendation of approval without condition, disapproval, or conditional
approval subject to the submission of additional information relating to or the modification
of the proposed service plans.
Based upon evidence presented at the public meeting by staff, the applicant, and other
interested parties, including Exhibit B, Staff Report, attached and incorporated herein by this
reference, the service plan submitted for the proposed amendment to the Roaring Fork Water
and Sanitation District has adequately demonstrated the following:
*32-r-203(2):
(a) That there is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service.in the area to be
serviced by the proposed special districts;
(b) The existing service in the area to be served by the proposed special district is adequate
for present and projected needs;
(c) The proposed special district is capable of providing economical and sufficient service to
the area within its boundaries;
(d) The area to be included in the proposed special district has, or will have the financial
ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
RESOLUTION
NOW THERBFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of Garfield County,
Colorado, that:
A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution.
B. The Planning Commission recorlmends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the service plan.
C. The purpose of this Resolution is to memorialize the action taken on July 13,2016.
Dated this 13fr day of July, A.D. 2016.
ATTEST:GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COLORADO
Stephen Damm, Secretary
Garfield County Planning Commission
Bob Fullerton, Chairman
Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the
following vote:
Commission Chairman Bob Fullerton , Aye/I.{ay
Commissioner Vice-Chair Keith Lammev , Aye/I.{ay
Commissioner Secretary Stephen Damm , AyeA.{ay
Commissioner Eric Rudd
Commissioner Gres McKennis
, AyeA.{ay
, Aye/I.{ay
Commissioner Michael Sullivan , Aye/i.{ay
Commissioner Kasev Nisoel AyeA{ay
Associate Commissioner f-ee Damuth , Aye/I.{ay
Associate Commissioner Matt Langhorst , Aye/I.Iay
Associate Commissioner Steve Kyle , AyeA.{ay
Planning Commission Exhibits
Text Amendment TXTP-OS- 1 6-8457
\st-l.
€A,qSr*S
Proof of Publication
Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended
Garfield Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as amended
ication
Staff Memorandum
Statf Presentation
EXF|EF
--
Gurfield Coun$
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION
Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your public
hearing. ln addition, please initial on the blank line next to the statements if they accurately reflect the
described action.
tr My apptication required written/mailed notice to adjacent property owners and mineral
owners.
Mailed notice was completed on the day of 20L6.
All owners of record within a 200 foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as
shown in the Clerk and Recorde/s office at least 15 calendar days prior to sending
notice.
All owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in
theClerkandRecorderorAssessor,orthroughothermeans[list]-
r Please attach proof of certified, return receipt requested mailed notice.
E My application required Published notice.
_/_
Please
Notice was published on the l*a^, ot
attach proof of publication in the Rifle Citizen Telegram.
2o,". (tb- D^j N6K:F
Rfilu(R@)
tr My application required Posting of Notice.
Notice was posted on the day of 20L6.
Notice was posted so that at least one sign faced each adjacent road right of way
generally used by the public.
I testify that the above information is true and accurate.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Take Notice that the Director of Community Development has applied to the Planning
Commission to amend multiple articles of the Land Use and Development Code including
modifications to lot slope in Article 3, clarification of code requirements for process and
procedures in Article 4, and other clarifications and corrections to code provisions in Articles 3, 4,
5,6, and7.
All persons affected by the proposed text amendment are invited to appear and state their views,
protests or support. If you cannot appear personally at such hearing, then you are urged to state
your views by letter, as the Planning Commission will give consideration to all comments received,
in deciding whether to approve, modify or deny the text amendments. The application may be
reviewed online at http://www.garfield-county.com/public-records/county-documents.aspx by
putting the file number TXTP-05-16-8457 into the search box, or at the office of the Community
Development Department located at 108 Sft Street, 4s Floor, Garfield County Administration
Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
A public hearing on this request has been scheduled for the 13ft day of July at 6:00 p.m. in the
County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Administration Building, 108 8m Street,
Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
Fri, Jun 10, 2016
12171722
08:05:42
Ad Ticket #5
ACCI: 10086e3
PhOne. (e70)e45-8212
E-Mail. TALLEN@GARFIELD-COU
Name. Garfield County Building
AddfeSS: 1 08 8th Street - Ste 401
City: Glenwood sPrings
State: CO
CIient:
Callef : Kathy Eastley, AICP
_Receipt Zip: 81601
Ad Name: 121717224
Editions: 8CT/
Start: 06/16/16
Color:
Copyline: ct Amend Land Use and Developm
Original ld: 0
Class: 0990
Stop: 06/16/16
lssue 1
Rgp' Pl Legals
PTEUCNONCE
Take l.lolhe ihd the Dlrec'td d Cdnmunlly DeveF
opment has appll€d to the Plannlng Cornmlsdon lo
amend multlple articles cI' lho Lsnd Use and De-
velopmeni Code lncludlng modltbdlons to ld dope
ln Artlclo 3, clarltbalbn cil code requiremerils rol
process and procedures ln Artlclo 4, and othgr
claritbatbns and corqilions to oode prorldqls ln
&tlcles3,4,5,6, ard 7.
All persns E rected by the prcpos€d lext emend-
menl are lrwlted to eDpear and state thelr vlsw8.menl are lrwlted to appear and state lhelr vlswa,
prclosts or suppon. ll you canrd appear persort.
allv et sLEh hearlno.lhen vou are uoed lo stde
prclosts or suppon. ll you canrd appear pers(
ally at sr^Eh hearlng,lhen you are uoed to str
your vle$,s bv letter, as the Plennlnq Commlsdyour vlorvs by letter-, as the Plennlng eommlsdqr
rylll oive cffsiderallon lo all cornmenls recelved. lnrvlll give cffsiderallon loall commerits recelved,ln
decidlng whether to approve, modily or deny lhe
lext emendmente. The aDollcatlon mev be re-text ariendmente. Th'6 appllcatloir may bb re-
vlewed onllne d
TrPOS-!6€457 inlo the *arEh box, or d tho d-
lbe ol tho Community D€velopmenl Departmenl
localed at 108 8th Street, 4th Floor, Gartleld
Courty Admlnlstralion Bulldlng, Glernivood Springs,
Colorad, belween lhe hours d 8r30 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., tulorday throrgh Frlday.
A pub{b hearing on lhis requesl has been sch€d-
uled lor the 13th day ot July ql 8:00 p.m. ln the
County Commlssloners Meetlng Flrom, Garrleld
County Admlnlstratlon BulHlnE, 108 8lh Street,
Glonwood Spfl ngs, Color*.
Pub,llsh€d ln the Citlzen Telegram ..Une 16,20t6.
(12171722t
Ad shown is not actual print size
Lines: 37
Depth: 3.1
Columns: 1
Discount: 0.00
Commission: 0.00
Net: 0.00
Tax: o.oo
Payment 0.00
TYPE OF REVIEW:
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
Text Amendment to the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code
Various
TXTP-o5-16-M57
Community Development
July 13, 2015
Page 3-5
Page 3-6
Page 3-7
Page 3-15
t'renogr|.rSeHPrxil ,i :.:r,: :,r i:i.t l!:liri::ll: a:i:l.ti.. ,rr-Lr ri:if'ii ! r'rii r,i 5i
ln the course of administering the Land Use Code both planning and legal staff have identified code
sections that could be improved, clarified or restated. These improvements are proposed to code sections
contained in Articles 3, 4,5,6 and 7 of the 2013 Land Use and Development Code, as amended.
ffffircutruilotscffiit ':;,.|],i:'f il!r,i1u1.
Proposed Land Use and Development,Code Amendments
ARTICTE 3 existing proposed
Table 3-
20t
3-302 D.
Table 3-
301
Table 3-
303A
ARTICTE 4
Maximum Floor Area Ratio
General Restrictions and
Measurements - Lot Slope
Floodplain Overlay Use
Restriction Tabte
Airport Overlay Restriction
Table
Common Review Procedures
and Required Notice
Amendments to an Approved
LUCP
MinorTemporary Housing
Facility
CalFup to the BOCC
Rezoning
0.so/1.o
D.1and2
Footnote 4
+tO7 Temp
Housing Facility &
4-113 Rezoning
process and
decision maker
confusing
B.11.language
standard prooess
5O96 in RS, RU, C[ and CG
Delete D.2. - keep D.1.E21
add Gravel PiUExtraction to the
table with a P under "Areas
outside of Floodway..."
add subject to 3-303 8.,7-8IJ,2
and 7-8O3
Temp housing Notice
requiremenu/add process for
zone corrections in 4-113
clarify if minor amendmefi
requires an Administrative
review or if it is iust approved
consistent notice with
Administrative rcview
change fiom'challenged' to
'issued'
add correctbn process to
change the map
Page4-7
Page 4-9
Page 4-10
Page 4-t7
Page4-17
Table 4-
toz
4-106
4-to7
4-Lt2
+tt3
Planning Commission, July 73,20LG
Code Amendments
ARTICTE 5
Table 5-
Page 5-3 103
Page 5-6 5-301
ARTICTE 6
Page 6-8 6-302
ARTICTE 7
PageT-7 7-2OtE.
PageT-7 7-201E.5.
PageT-7 7-2OLE.t.
Page 7-55 7-t20tB.
Common Review Procedures
and Required Notice
Minor Subdivision Review
Description of Submittal
Requirements
Agricultural Land
lrrigation ditch maintenance
easement
lrrigation ditches
Accessory Structure
Final Plat
c.L under review
criteria
5-302 B.
lrrigation Ditches
"...shall
indicated..."
notes on plats and
site plans only
when a ditch exists
Change and to or
and include fence,
etc as examples
add a check in "Referral Agency"
add in "...Code, including
Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7"
Change subsections from a and
b to l and 2; remove "is" from
first line of b.
E.l. remove staff note
"...shall be indicated..."
W$,$$n sur
Section 4-tl4 outlines the procedures and criteria for
request to the LUDC. The criteria for approval of a Land Use Code Text Amendment are as follows:
1. The proposed text amendment is in compliance with any applicable intergovernmental
agreements; and
There are no intergovernmental agreements impacted by the proposed text amendment.
2. The proposed text amendment does not conflict with State law.
The proposed text amendment does not conflict with State law.
'eoil$TDERANON
rl :.r .. . .: : I ,, .:.., ;.::,' :., l.l. t..l:::i:,,iti:l,,r,tll,.,,i.r;ili.i;.ii:: :-:. r 1' : .'
consideration of a Land Use Code Text Amendment
2lPage
Garficld County
AGENDA
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
108 8th Street, Room 100' Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Tuesday, July 5, 2016
8:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL - 8:00 a.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS NOT ON THE AGENDA- 8:05 a.m.
lndividuals may be limited to 5 minutes each.
REGULAR WORK SESSION:
1. Consent Agenda: ltems of a routine nature are placed on the Consent Agenda to
allow the Board of Gounty Commissioners to spend its time and energy on more
important items on a lengthy agenda. Any Commissioner or any member of the
public may request that an item be "REMOVED" from the Consent Agenda and
considered on the Regular Agenda.
a. Approve Bills
b. Approve Changes to Prior Warrant List
c. Request from MML LLC forthe Garfield County Commissioners to veriff that
the Medical Marijuana Optional Premises state license issued to the applicant
is being renewed and the applicant has submitted this renewal application to
the local authority as required by Garfield County Resolution 12-52. - Jean
Alberico
d. Authorize the chair to sign a CDOT Access Permit for the intersection of
County Road 154 and State Highway 82 as applied for by RE-1 School
District and represented by Yancy Nichol of Sopris Engineering, LLC. No
improvements are required as part of this permit - Yancy Nichol and Tamra
Allen
2. County Manager Update: County Manager Kevin Batchelder
a. Public Meetings:
Action ltems:
Presentations and lnformation ltems:i. Update on SPARQ Station in Rifle - Matt Shmigelsky, Garfield Clean
Energy and Keith Gilstrap, Gilco Petroleum
ii. Update on Meeney property - Joshua Williams and Steve Anthony
iii. Update on Eastern Property Cleanup - Joshua Vt/illiams
iv. Update on Cattle Creek Project - Kevin Batchelder and Fred Jarman
v. Update on CNG Shop Upgrade - Deb Fiscus
This agenda is subject to change, including the addition of items up to 24hous in advance or the deletion of items at any time.
All times are approximate. lf special accommodations are necessary per ADA, please contact 945-5004 prior to the meeting.
Prepared by: Vola Mercer, Executive Asslsfanf
Posted on:
b. Public Hearings:
3. County Attorney Update: County Attorney TariWilliams
4. Executive Session:
a. Upon the affirmative vote of twothirds of the Commissioners, the Board will
adjourn to executive session pursuant to C.R.S. SS 24-6402(4)(b) and (e) to
confer with attorneys for the purposes of receiving legal advice on specific
real property matters and determining positions relative to the handling of
each.
a. An executive session may be requested on any item appearing on the
agenda.
LUNCH - Noon
COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS NOT ON THE AGENDA: f :00 p.m.
lndividuals may be limited to 5 minutes each.
REGULAR AGENDA: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ISSUES:
1. County Attorney Update - Land Use lssues:
2. Public Meetings:
a. Consider joining in a referral of a Service Plan Amendment to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation. The Roaring Fork Water and
Sanitation District submitted a Service Plan Amendment to the Clerk and
Recorder on June 20,2016. - Kathy Eastley
b. Consider a request for a third extension to the timeframe for submitting an
Affordable Housing Agreement related to the approval granted for a final plat for
lronbridge Phase lll, Filing 1 on September 21, 2015. The Applicant, Karl Hanlon
on behalf of Blue Heron Properties, LLC, requests an additiona! 60-days to
submit an Affordable Housing Agreement. - Kathy Eastleyc. Consider a request for a one year extension to the Preliminary Plan for Oak
Meadows Ranch PUD Preliminary Plan, Filing 4, Phase 3 approved by the Board
of County Commissioners on July 21, 2008. The current extension for the
timeframe to file a technically complete final plat expires on July 21,20'16. The
Applicants are Terrix Financial Corp., Ethan Jacobson and Emerald lsle Lending
Company. - Kathy Eastley
3. Public Hearings:
COUNTY ATTORNEY UPDATE:
COUNTY MANAGER UPDATE:
COMMTSSIONER ISSUES:
a. Commissioner Reports
b. Commissioner Calendars
c. Approva! of Minutes
d. CommissionerAgenda ltems
ADJOURNMENT
This agenda is subject to change, including the addition of items up lo 24 hours in advance or the deletion of items at any time.
All times are approximate. lf special accommodations are necessary per ADA, please contact 945-5004 prior to the meeting.
Prepared by: Vola Mercer, Executive Assisfanf
Posted on:
Next Meetinqs:
AGENDA
cARFTELD couNry #?[5 3F
"%"r[*
coMMrssroNERs
108 8th Street, Room 100
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Wednesday, July 6, 2016
9:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
1. Human Service Commission Grant Discussion - Martha Fredendall and Julie Olson2. Receive feedbacUdirection regarding implementing a wellness program - Diane
Hayes
GITIZEN COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
108 8t'Street, Room 100
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Monday, July 11, 2016
8:00 a.m.
This agenda is subject to change, including the addition of items up lo 24 hours in advance or the deletion of items at any time.
All times are approximate. lf special accommodations are necessary per ADA, please contact 945-5004 prior to the meeting.
Prepared by: Vola Mercer, Executive Assrsfant
Posted on:
SGM
o(oU'E
=H&p
.>
.?
slaf,JkJ
l0epuno6 rcusto - osrvr:u fJ
uorsnpqt-jlu,--
o(n
slaJJed
{repumg }f,ulslo - osrnJd l:3
saurtadr6 rarnag
qle6 acue{anuoJ urev\l alJol
o(0a=
=Atfrp
.>5?
oa
RFWSD
July 13,2016SGM
RFWSD
July 13,2016SGM
RFWSD
July 13, 2016
.SGM
SGM RFWSD
July 13,2016
ao3
-*"RE-l lndusion
fl nrwso - Disrict Boundary
Parcels
slaf,Jed
[repurn6 putslg - oS/v\JU f:
saurtadr6 :alrag
qled acue{anuloJ ulen aoJol
o(o
9FHP
.>
?
=oa
O ARV
Proposed Water Main
-
Wbter Pipelines
Proposed Force Main
Force Main Conveyance Path
*- Sewer Pipelines
--.RE-1 lnclusion
l-l nrwso - District Boundary
SGM RFWSD
July 13,2016
SGM
O ARV
Proposed Water Main
".- \ hter pipetines
Proposed Force Main
Force Main Conveyance path
** Sewer Pipelines
--,RE-l lnclusion
fl nrwso - District Boundary
RFWSD
July 13,2016