Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Staff Report Extension Request BOCC 05.19.16Board of County Commissioners - Public Meeting Exhibits Pinyon Mesa Filing 2 - Preliminary Plan Extension Request ApPlicant is RE DeveloPment CorP. May 9, 2016 (File N/A) ./pp"qJ (s ^a) 1 velopme@ 2 OartietO Countv Comprehensive Plan q[]!Q!Q 3 tetter and Supportinq Materials from AppliL 4 Staff Report 5 6 7I I 10 11 12 13 14 REQUEST APPLICANT - PROPERTY OWNER REPRESENTAT!VE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # PROPERTY SIZE LOCATION ACCESS EXISTING ZONING BOCC 51912016 DP Extension of an Expired Preliminary Plan - Pinyon Mesa Subdivision RE Development Corp. Scott Dillard 2393-071-06-001 Pinyon Mesa Subdivision, Filing 2 is 33.798 acres. The impacted area is a 33.798 acres approximately 4.5 miles south City of Glenwood Springs off State Highway 82 and County Road 114 and known as Parcel Number 239307106001. The property is accessed by County Road 114. The property is zoned PUD - High Density Single Family. PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS parcel of the GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant is requesting to resurrect an expired Preliminary Plan for the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision, as approved. The amendment would resurrect the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision Preliminary Plan of the Los Amigos PUD which expired one year from the date of approva!, per the Subdivision Regulations of 1984. As the Preliminary Plan was approved on December 1 1 , 2006, the Preliminary Plan expired on December 1 1 ,2007. The Resolution of Approval for the Preliminary Plan (2007-04) did not grant a longer timeframe then that identified in the Subdivision Regulations of 1984, and no subsequent extensions to the Preliminary Plan were approved by the Board. The Final Plat for Pinyon Mesa Filing 1 was signed by the BOCC on October 8,2007 while Filing 2 has not yet been submitted. No alteration to the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision Preliminary Plan, as approved, or other amendments to the Los Amigos PUD are proposed. The impacted parcels are zoned PUD - High Density Single Family. Phase 3F of the Los Amigos PUD, which includes both Filings 1 and 2 of Pinyon Mesa Subdivision, was approved for 80 high density single family lots in the lower valley area of Los Amigos PUD. Of these 80 lots, 48 lots have been platted as a pafi of Los Amigos, Filing 1. 32 Lots remain to be platted as part of Filing 2. Vicinity Map Location Map of Los Amigos PUD Phase 3F, Pinyon Mesa Filing 2 : r,rr1 i 1r 'ii ,' l .iir]'l'.,i]i]! q ;.1!J15ln50ll:,t]0.!i )t01i.i Proposed Site Plan of Pinyon Mesa Filing 2 ,gmn -El s,IE A6EESS l.* II. STAFF COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS Regarding the expiration of Land Use Change Permits and Divisions of Land approvals, Section 4-101(l)(4) states the following: New Apptication Required. lf an Applicant fails to timely request an ertension as sef forth in section 4-101.1., the approval will be void and the Applicant must submit a new application for the desired Land Use Change or division of tand approval notwithstanding the foregoing, the BOCC may grant an ertension of an otherwise exoired approval upon a finding by the 4OCC that the faiture to file for an ertension was due b ertenuatino circumstances and that it benefits the public interest to grant the extension. The Applicant has submitted a letter stating that the extenuating circumstances lehding to a Final Plat for Filing 2 not being approved prior to the expiration date include the finandal impacts caused by the Great Recession and subsequent foreclosure. The current owner purchased the property on December 11, 2013. tt is Staff's opinion that due to the Preliminary Plan being previously approved as a part of the larger Los Amigos PUD, the lack of any modifications proposed to the Preliminary Plan approval from 2006, and the current need for housing in and around the Roaring Fork Valley, that granting the extension is in the public interest. Should the Board approve the request to extend this Preliminary Plan, then the property owner will be able to move fonruard with submittal of the Final Plat. However, should the Board not approve this extension, then the property owner wil! need to resubmit the Preliminary irian as a new application which will require public hearings with both the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. III. SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. That the failure to request a timely extension was caused by extenuating circumstances and that granting of an extension of the Pinyon Mesa Preliminary Plan is in the best interest of the heafth, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 2. That with the adoption of conditions, the application is in general conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended. g. That with the adoption of the Conditions of Approval the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. V. RECOMMENDATION The following recommended conditions of approval are provided forthe Board of County Commissioners consideration. 1. That a!! representations made by the Applicant in the application shall be conditions of approva!, unless specifically altered by the Planning Commission. 2. That the Preliminary Plan for Pinyon Mesa Subdivision as approved under Resolution 2OO7-04 is extended for a period of 1 year from the date of this Resolution. EXHIBIT '.5 RE Development Corp. 2l County Road 126 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8160lo Ph; 970-355-4080 o E-Mail: scottdillardrealtor@gmail.com tnD Garfield County Board of County Commissioners lO8 8th Sreet, Suite l0l Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Preliminary Plan Re-instatement for Pinyon Mesa Phase 2 Dear Commissioners, This letter is intended to follow what is hopefully a May 9, 2016 BOCC action of approval regarding our Los Amigos PUDAmendment re-quest to extend the timeframe for-completion the project. With that, RE Development Corp respectfully requesfs that the BOCC grant a similar extension to the Pinyon Meia Preliininiry Plan approved uni[er Resolution No. 2AO7-O4. Provisions for this action are contemplated in LUDC section 4-101.I.4. which states: "BOCC may grant an extension of an otherwise expired approval upon a finding by ihe BOCC that failure to file for an extension was due to extenu+irg circuristinces and that it benefits the public interest to grant the extension." RE Development Corp.maintains that the expiration of the PUD was truly due to extenuating criucmstances beyond our control and that completion of Pinyon Mesa Phase 2 will benefit the public interest. If you have driven up the CMC road in the pastyearygu *oqq haveseen the imfressive amount of home construction going 9nin Pinyqq I{"tl. This has noi always been the case. The great recession, which started in 2OO8, had an enormous impact on the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision. Prior to the recession lots were selling a[ $ZZO,O0O, on the contrary, the low-water mark for lot sales went down to $31,000 in 2012. The original developer had a completion date for the subdivision of 12/31/2OlO. Unfortunately, by this date the developer was completely underwater, named in numerous lawsuits, an{ the developrnent was in the process of being foreclosed. By the time the,RE Qeyglgpment Corp. purchased what was remaining, which wisl2/ll/2013, the subdivision was far past its extension granted by Garfield County. Reinstatement of the pre-approved Preliminary Plan for Phase 2 will benefit the citizens of GarfieldCounry by allowing growth to occur in an area where it has been planned for. The ownei is not changing alythr_ng froln the original plan, andhas hired the same engineers who worked on the project previously.-Service agreements and plans with all utility providers are agreed upon and all Iirfl water and sewer tap fees have been pre-paid. Utilities are essentially stubbed to the property !ine. The impact of allowing the 32 units, which were previously approved, is far less than any other current plans on the table to add units to Garfield County. Road impacts will be minimal, as Phase 2 of the development will use the current entrance, which already has a deceleration lane in place. The additional tax proceeds to the County would be seen immediately, as the developer plans to plat, develop, and sell as soon as possible. Homes in this phase of the development would be coming online in conjunction with the new Eastbank School as well, which will immediately add to the enrollment of the new school. This phase is ready to go and there is an immediate need for *ris product in the real estate market. All we need is for the original preliminary plan to be re-instated sq that we can work with the staff to move towards Final Plat. Thank you for yq$r time. Best Dillard, President RE Development Corp. SSGM www.sgm-rnc.com April25,2016 David Pesnichak, Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Pinyon Mesa Phase ll Preliminary Plan Dear David, This letter supports RE Development Corporation's request for the BOCC to grant an extension to the approved Preliminary Plan for the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision. We expect that the BOCC will consider this action if the proposed Los Amigos PUD Amendment for a time extension is approved on May 9,2016. Herewith, we are transmitting the complete Preliminary Plan set from 2006 in PDF format. Please note that this plan set and application underwent extensive review by County Staff and various review agencies. Engineering review was completed by Chris Hale, PE of Mountain Cross Engineering. Ultimately, the BOCC unanimously approved the Preliminary Plan with conditions as described in Resolution No. 2007-04 recorded at Reception #: 716948 (also attached as a PDF). Other applicable documents and reports pertaining to the Preliminary Plan are available on the County's website. This proposed extension of the Preliminary Plan approval seems justified given that the lapse in completion was due to widespread, economic factors that occurred under previous ownership. Allowing development to occur in areas immediately adjacent to existing development where it has been planned will benefit the public interest by minimizing impacts on the environment, other land areas and day to day activities of the residents of Garfield County. Regarding technical issues, please note that SGM was the Engineer-of-Record for all of Los Amigos (aka Elk Springs) as wellas Pinyon Mesa Preliminary Plan and Phase 1 Final Plat. We are proposing no changes to the existing Preliminary Plan as approved. ! have reviewed the plans set and Resolution along with other components of the application. lt all seems to,work and we will be able to submit a Pinyon Mesa Phase 2 Final Plat in stlict conformance with the approved Preliminary Plan. !t is my understanding that County Staff will also seek engineering review of the Final Plat. Given the lapse in time, SGM has contacted the utility providers for Pinyon Mesa Phase 2 including: . Spring Valley Sanitation District o Elk Springs HOA (now water provider (formerly Red Canyon Water Company)) . Holy Cross Energy o Black Hills Energy (formerly Source Gas) o CenturyLink GLENWOOD SPRINGS 118 West Sixth St, Suite 200 | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | 970.945.1004 w\^lw.sgm-rnc.com As evidenced by the attached "will-serve" letters, none of these organizations took exception to the development of Pinyon Mesa Phase 2. Utility providers had previously planned for that to occur indicated the no major upgrades would be required. Service could be provided simply by extending nearby lines into the Pinyon Mesa Phase 2 area. Sufficient water supply, storage and transmission main capacity exists to deliVer potable water to the development. The existing wastewater lift station, which is located on this parcel, and the treatment plant also have built-in capacity for these 32 lots. Development of Phase 2 will allow existing overhead lines to be buried underground. Gas and telephone lines will simply be extended from Pinyon Mesa Phase 1 and CR 114 as envisioned in the Preliminary Plan. lf you have any questions, concerns or additional requirements regarding this request, please contact me at (970) 945-1004 at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, bh David M. Kotz, PE Project Manager cc: Scott Dillard Enclosures GLENWOOD SPRINGS 118 West Sixth St, Suite 200 | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 I 970.945.1004 PINYON MESA PRELIMINARYPLAN - COI'ER SHEE| 1-' PRELIMIMRY PUf OR' OIT-SIIE DRAIMGE I'IASIER PUTI DR2 ON-SI|E I4ASIER DRAIMCE PUN RPO-4 PINYOII TI€54 DRIW PUN Ii PROF1LE RP5-7 PAINIEIRUSH W.4Y PUN .K PRONLE RPA-9 SAGE lLlEANt( RAAC PUN & PROFILE RP'O_'2 CLIFFROSE *AY PIAN Ii PRONLE RP'J JUNIPER HILL UIIE PUN & PROFTLE S'-2 SEWER CONNECTION TO LIFT SANON PUN & PROFILE Uf,_2 i]|ILM IAS|EP PLAN OI,D2 PAER, SEWER, DRAIMGE RAD,UY D€|AILS ,It'LYlfY il4P NOBLE DESICN STUDIO 19351 TTICHTAY 02 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 OWNER / APPL\CANT ELK MESA PNOPENTIES. L.L.C. 2929 COUNTT ROAD 114 GLENtrOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO OI6OI JOHN ELMORE II 253 SILWRLODE .DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO OI6IT PREPARED BY: SCHMUESER GORDON ME/ER INC. I I I W. 6TH STREET, SunE 2OO GLilwooD SPRTNGS, CoLoR^Do E | @ I(970) 945-rOO4 FN( (970) 945-5944 As,a, CeoRADo (9701 925-6727 CREsro BuYtE. CO (97O) 3495355 e ERIGORDONIME/ER ENGTNEERS ISURVEYORS PROJECT ENGINEER: DAN W. CORDON, P,E. 14507 .iii ,"-.y',/ *7 1l1'. );i 1 I 1:I./';) l; )i, i n E F q UI fzt tl !, ii- .i".fi {1.r IItf, .ulI I . GRAPHIC .<(ALT r'!ca) 1\- ffi**n*ffiw@tffi'ii*E^ffiBrer6@ww MGNffi PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EOAD PfuW & PROFILE SEEET I,AYOUT PINYON MESA PRELIMINARY PIA,N PINYON MESA PRELIMINARY PLAN ^-9 Ee!F- EB Ea {r\E ,.N! dBec Ein QE -I T:: !-:). '_\ ,/,/,/. r t-d-f \ I\ tr6wMWM f -MW@N PRELIMINAFV NOT FOR coNSrRUCION uO it a. gq .L\ a$ffi W$Mtu f , wcw@N PRELIMINARY N07 FOR CONSTRUCNON Ess8L* r lit HUN m 16 ir :l H .zEO HuuEE6 \:| ,{ Ilz-_, EE :E $t BE \\j \/ s.\$\J ,l 1 t, i. /' NY'/ '1 .E.,. ----a .. qI / --\..r- /: -r.\f -'>\n. :i_. ': 44 t uNS; FE FS H MMC. tu ilsM' o@ao l# Ns MA NS|AL *V StAW f fr oEtatL d ffir 02 f6M FNE.- fkilbs@; ;-r./..:4E : / GhAPHIC SCALts # ( |l 7tl, , PRELIMINAF|Y, NOTroR CONSTRUCTION ,.fi s x ; t^ l! idIi!r 89r( l^r I .zEO isrEdeE8 Fl ,rl *t: t,i .., ;t !.1 at ili:t 'h+ ! Ea s $ $ ,nk I $ Nq EsE s{ EaEE tElEt EErIi itili ul *El :E H$ IiflHB {. Er EI E9 H.l:'lei llp s' U H .l I H!d t l I art Eet; J !*r $E tliiiilli rN[-iEiiiiE d$ts r 8{ieE!i \ iilii HNE:Eil I= $i$i$EE E: Eid}T Br bE ;E aa Efi rlt., I E,Ifl JE Ei $t EI id tx $I EI Ei iE Ell {x ua rE 5edT sl n d lh cI rE ut E; t. FT E} ii E; Ei EEI (Ar: t._ -cI fj$, sx ll $ji tI H tii $EI EI -c e I E$i* E!EEI u E I !n\\ itrE EE ct Ets $3 I ET EE I E Iq 1... isr l$e *lE 'r8* I I T!tl II t I'I NI FI H $l $l t ilNSi FH _2t&- ffircEWdN -ffiM,IW\Mnn@ M'NWEMLIN-ffidAME@ ffiilffiM&tMS(q@)w* M N4d. frM,R fu*MNUYMNfrMNS *tutr/w.M@f D sftHttu ffi@taaw-@*-** ry|#' @b#fr*DRAIN INLET *:,2'.,'<' I/ALLEY PAI! DAAIL PREL'MINARY NOr FOR CONSIRUCTION IfP. EI4ERGICY ROAD CROSS-SECIION Mrmw tt M *rtaN&qo*@e' ru&.E. rtuCamaEM SECNON A-A SECNON B_B YA?ER, DRAINAGE & EOADYAY DETAILS PINYON MESA PREAMINARY PI.AN ) )ss ) llll i{,t }tl,llil HJl,lt,l,lr4 l+Hfl {fiiltrtiii ff | tl ll I i,"a".,'.?rdfi[i,ffi 9r":,183?E.gp?p.d"38,fi i?"[d.. STATE OF COLORADO County of Carfield At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado. held in tfr" Co*irissioners'Meeting Room, Garfield County PlazaBuilding. in Glenwood Springs on Monday, December 11, 2006, there were present: JohnMmtin-.--,CommissionerChajrman L-.y lt{.C"*g, ' Commissioner frdti norpt .- , Commissioner D"t, D"F*.L ' CountY AttorneY Mtld*,d Al-td"tf - - , Clerk of the Board nO CrJ* - , CountY Manager when the following proceedings, alnong others were had and done, to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. 2go7-04 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WMH THE APPROVAL OF A PRELMINARY PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE PINYON MESA SUBDIVISION IN PHASE 3 OF THELoSAMIGoSRANCHPLANNEDUNITDEVELoPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Courrty Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, received a Preliminary Plan Application from Pinyon Mesa Development' LLC to subdivide a 60.49-acre p.op.rty Giso known as Phase 3 of the l-os Amigos Ranch PUD) in to g0 high-density singfe family residential lots and which prcpefiy is generally located in lower Spring Valle!, approiimately I mile east of the Highway 82 / CR I 14 intersection-in the N /z of Sictions 7 and 8, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth P.M., Garfield CountY; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the High Density Single Family Zone District within Phase 3 of the Los Amigos Ranch Planned Unit Development (PUD)I and WHEREAS, on Ocrober 11,2006, the Garfield County Planning and Zoning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval with conditions to the Board of County Commissioners for the Preliminary Plan; and WHEREAS, on December l l, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners opened a public hearing upon rhe question of whether the Preliminary Plan should tre granted, Branted with condirions, or denied at which hearing the public and interested persons irere given the opportunity to expres$ their opinions regarding the issuance of said Preliminary Plan; and f,q#',,','Heil',q*fl II! j*;il'.iliH"[':'',,' WHEREAS. rhe Board of County Commissioneni closed the public hearing on the December I l, 2006 to make a final decision; and WHEREAS, the Board competent evidence Produced determination of facts: That proper publication, public notice, and posting was provided as require! by law for the hiarings before tt" pl*ning and Zoning Commission and before the Board of County Commissioners. That the public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Cornmission and the Board of Cotrnty Commissioners were extensive and complete; all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted; and thar all interested parties were heard at those hearings. The application is in compliance rvith the standards set forth in Section 4:00 of the Garfield county subdivision Regulations of 1984. as amended. That the proposed subdivision of la,nd is in compliance with the recommendations set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated areas of the County' The proposed subdivision of land c,rnforms to the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of fbZS, as amended and the provisions of the High Density Single Family zone district in the Los Amigos Ranch PUD. 6. The proposed use is in the besr interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of county Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that based on determination of facts set forth above, the Preliminary Plan request is approved with the following conditions: 1.That all representations made by the Applicant in the application and as testimony in the puUiic hearings before the Planning & Trlrung Commission urd Board of County Commissioners shall be conditions of approval. unless specifically alt6r€d by the Board of County Commissioners- All internal roads shall be designed to have a road surface of at least two l2-foot driving lanes with curb and gutter throughout the subdivision with a minimum right of way of 50 feet. Such design of the internal road system shall be consistent witb the design proposed to the IIOCC in the Preliminary Plan. The length of the cul-de-sac represented as Pinyon Mesa Drive shall be allowed to be designed, as shown, to 900 lineir feet and the bulb at the end of the cul-de-sac may remain as designed with a landscaped island in the middle- of County Commissioners on the basis of suhstantial at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following t. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. 3. Ill I il"'J lt':r, llF, llU, lH t lltl, l,l4lHilrl Llil, lf rl lit I I I I I I Recept ions: 716948 02lOAl2OOT 04:38.23 Pl, B:1893 P:0355 Jcen A!berico3 ot 6 Rec Fee,g0,OO Doc Fee, GFRFIELD COUIITY C0 4.The Applicant shall furnish a design and specifications fbr the secondary emergency point at the end of Paintbrush Way that indicates rhe ability to handle Iarge / heavy emergency vehicles and methods of break-away gates or other appropdate mechanism to deter use unless for emergency. This shall be prepared and provided prior to final plat. Applicant shall obtain a driveway access permit for both the main enEance into the projects and for the secondary emergency access point onto CR I 14 these shall be obtained prior to final plat. The Applicant shall install a $top sign at each entrance to CR 114. The signs, posts and location shall be as required by the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices). An intersection sign shall be placed on both sides of the main entrance to the subdivision alerting uphill and downhill tmffic to the entrance. The signs, posts and installation shall be as required in the MIJ"ICD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices). Pursuant to the suggestions by the Road and Bridge Department in Exhibit M, the Applicant may either l) construct a right-hand turn lane should be installed on the uphill lane to the main entrance to the subdivision and be reimbursed by the total amount of Traffic Impact Fees required by the Development (approximately $150,000.00) or 2) choose not t'r construct the improvement a only pay the Traffic Impact Fee. The Applicant shall pay the appropriately calculated Traffic Impact Fee for Study Area lO which results in a fee of approximately $149,292.00. Only half of this fee (approximately $74,646.00) is required to be paid at Final Plat with the remaining half to be amortized by way of individual building permits as the project develops over time. 9. The Applicant shall cause the conveyance of the School Percel by deed to the RE- I School District prior to Final PIat or pay the appropriately calculated School / Land Dedication Fee pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations. 10. All development of this property shall follow tle recommendations of the Colorado Stat€ Forest Service as stated in their letter dated August 28,2006, (attached as Exhibit N to the Staff report) which shall be incorporated into the CCRs as a requiremcnt of the BOCC particularly as they relate to lots l7-2O,36- 48.66-72 and lots 59-65. 11. The Applicant shall pay-in-full the fire impact fee of $437 per dwelling unit to Carbondale Fire Protection District at the time of Final Plat. (This fee shall be $34,960.00) 12. The Applicant shall incorporate the recommendations contained in the "Wildlife 6. 7. 8. _l r,l ;f1l lt?,llllHri Ht[,tl'l, lilHl{tH[ ]lti iu ] ll I Rc cept ionH : 716948 O2|O8!2@O7 04:38:23 Pl'l 8.1893 P:0366 Jean Albeirico4 ot 6 Rec Fee,$0.@0 Doc Fee: GARFIELD COUNIY C0 Analysis / Impact and Mitigation Report' prepaled by Rocky Mountain Ecological Services, [nc. conterined in the Application and shall be included as a component in the ccRs. 13. Prior to Final Plat submittal. the Applicant shall meet with the DOW in order to prepare an Elk Management Plan due to the amount of critical wintering habitat being eliminated with development. (This was not completed.) 14. The Applicant shall cause the open space tracts to be deeded to the Homeowners Association as part of the Final Plat. 15. The Applicant shall provide a security for revegetation in the amount to be determined by the County Vegetation Manager (based on disturbed acreage) for all areas to be disturbed in connection with the final plat and the obligations of said security which security shall be incorporated into the Subdivision Improvements Agreement. The security shall be held by Garfield County until vegetation has been successfully rcestablished according to the Rerlamation Sundards in the Garfield County Vegetation Management Plan. 16. The Applicant shall provide a Soil Management Plan that includes l) provisions for salvaging on-site topsoil, 2) a timetable for eliminating topsoil and/or aggregate piles, and 3) a plan that provides for soil cover if any disturbances or stockpiles will sit exposed for a period of 90 days or more. The Applicant shall prepare this plan to be submitted with the final plat documents so that the County can review prior to finalplat approval. 17. The Applicant shall follow all of the recommendations provided in the geotechnical analysis prepared by HP Geotech (reports in the Application and Exhibit S ro the Staff Report) as well as the follow the recommendations provided by the Colorado Geologic Survey in their letter dated August 30, 2006 also attached as Exhibit J to the staff report). 18. All easements of record shall be shown on the Final Plat. 19. The Applicant shall include the six points provided in the letter from the Bureau of land Management dated August 22,2Cfl6 (and attached to the Staff report as Exhibit P) in the CCRs to place residents in the PUD on notice of these issues. The CCRs shall be provided as part of the Final Plat submittal. 20. The following plat noces shall he placed on the final plat. h. "Control ofnoxiotts weed.s is the respouibility of the property owner." "One (l) dog will be allon'edfor each residential unit and the dog shall be required to be confined w,ithin the owners propert* boundaries." c- "No open hearth solid-fuel .fireplaces will be allow-ed anyn'here within the lll il'rl,J ]t?,|+,tilil ffi ['a,lilfHf[+r.hll[t{ I lllReception$: 7169t18 O2|OA|2OOT 04 38:23 pltl B. rg93 P 0367 Jean ntberrca5 of 5 Rec Fee:$o.Co Doc Fee, GARFIELD C0UNrY C0 subdivision. One (l) neu, solid-fuel burning stove as defied by C.R.S- 25-7- 101, et. seq., and the regulation.s promulgated thereunder, u'ill be ailowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be alloned an unresticted number ofnatural gas burning stoves andappliances". d. Nofunlrcr subdivision shall be allowed of a subdivided lot." e, "All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amoun! necessary and that all exterior lighting be directe:d inward and downward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be made to allow for safery lighting thot goe$ beyond the property hctundaries". f. "Colorado is a "Right-to-Farm" State pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-101, et seq. Inndowners, residents and pisitors mu.tt be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and smells of Gatfield County's agricultural operations as o normal and necessary aspect of living in a County with a strong rural character and a healthy rarrching sector. Those with an urban sensitivity may perceive such activities, sights, sounds and smells only as inconvenience, eyesore, noise and odor- However, State law and County policy provide that ranching, farming or otltcr agricrtltural activities and operations withirt Gaffield County shall not b,e considered to be nuisunces so long as operated in conformance with the ktw and in a non-negligent manntr. Therefore, all must be prepared to errcounter noises, odor, liglfis, ntud, dust, smoke chemicals, machinery on public roads, livestock on public roads, storage arul disposal of manure, and the applic'ation by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides, and pesticides, an)- one or nrore of which may naturally occur as a part of a lagal and non-negligent agricuburul <tperations. g. "All owners of land, whelher ranclt or residence, have obligations under State law and County regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences ard irrigatiott ditches, contrctl[ing weeds, keeping livestock tutd pets under control, using propefi in accordarce with zoning, and other aspects of using and m.aintaining property. Residents and landowners are enc:ouraged to learn about lhese rights and resportsibiliries and act as good neighbors and citizens of the County. A good introductory source for such infonttation is "A Guidt to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture" put ottt by the Colorado State Universitt Extension Ofice in Gafield Couttty." h. "All lots shall require sile specific geotechnical studies before a building pennit will be issued by the County Building Department and all foundatiortsslnll be designed by a profes,sional engineer licensed to prac.tice in Colarado. i. Tttne Disffict Parameters: Zonc Obtrlcl f;ongmomt Urcr' Hmlmum:Lot Arse tutmum Lot ulilmun S.tbabkE uuaflrllm HCoht mIl,llum Floor Area lll tlt'r lll,l*il Htl ll d,htJlHlJlillfflt{'fi lrl'l ll ll I Receotion*: 7t6948oztodtzaoz o4r38:23 Pt't 8,1893 P:0368 Jean Alber^co6 of 6 Rec Fee:50.00 Doc Fee: GARFIELD COUNTY C0 Aat otfelcralr\ "A.D. 2007. COMMISSIONERS, G COUNTY. Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoin the following vote: Johqlvtartin - - 'AYe Er,r,Mcco*n - - - 'AY"Tr6sHrupl - , 'AYe STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield County Clerk and ex-officio Cler.k of the Board or@rs in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby cenify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is Uuly copied from the Records of the proceeding of the Board of County Cornmissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WrrNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this .- day of . A.D.2007 Gorcraae Hign uenstty Slngle FamilY (HDSR Home Occupation 10,000 sq. ft.25c/" Front / Rsar: 25' Sides: 10' 28 teet 3,294 sq. ft. GARFIELD BOARD COUNTY OF ) )ss ) County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners Karp^Neu^H^q.p!gn; James S. Neu i.:"nampuuqrda'Yllursrnr January 11,2016 Scott Dillard sdi I l?rdreal tor{# g:mai Lc,.gm Sander N. Karp* James S. Neu Karl J. Hanlon Michael J. Sawyer James F, Fosnaughl Jefhey J. Conklin Andrew A. Mueller ' rew d*e Lb0clcdLed@yur,t*Fc Matthew L.'l'rinidad Patrick L. Barker Jon T. iloistad Delphine ['. Janey OfCounsel Richard l. Zuber'r Anna S. ltenberg Greg S. Russi Hollie L. Wieland fiFet{behc*tt fp4a, etndmtid L.t,e, Glenwood Sorines Olfice 2or '76ffi;SffiooP.0. Drawer 2030 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Aqten Oflice*r. 323 W. Main Srreet, Suite 301 Aspcn,CO 816ll 'lilephone: (97 O) 9 4 5 -226 I Factimile: (970) 915-7336 t:r:rr.m!!urlc!nt!!B-ti-mlga![ MWt4b Re: Dear Scott: Spring Vallev Sanitation DistricUPinyon Mesa Phase II PUD Amendment- Time Extension As you know, we represent the Spring Valley Sanitation District (the "Distict"). It is my understanding that you own a portion of Elk Springs PUD known as Pinyon Mesa Phase II which is to be developed with thirty-two (32) single family dwellings (the "Property"). The Dishict has the capacity in its wastewater treatment plant and can and will serve the Property with wastewater treatrnent service subject to &e following conditions: A complete set of sewer construction plans axe provided to the Dishict for its review and approval; The approval by the Distict of any Line Extension Agreement or Line Connection Agreemenl that may be required by the Dishict's Rules and Regulations; and Pursuant to the District's Rules and Regulations, the Applicant shall reimburse the District for all costs incurred by the Distict regarding this project, including, but not limited to legal and engineering review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, KARP NEU HANLON, P.C. l. 2. 3. Z L Kelly Mullane es S. Neu ELK SPRINGS HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 2929 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970)94s-6399 February 16,2016 To Whom lt May Concern: The Elk Springs Homeowner's Association (Association) owns and operates the potable water system for the Los Amigos Ranch PUD. The Red Canyon Water Company and the Elk Springs Homeowners Association agreed to deliver to the Lower Valley (Pinyon Mesa), at the Point of Detivery, an amount of water sufficient to serve the reasonable domestic and residential needs of up to eiehty (80) single family homes in a monthly volume measured at the Master Water Meter not to exceed the Monthly Basic Allotment of 1,400,000 gallons of water. Red Canyon the Elk Springs Homeowners Association also committ"a "srppt.rental volumes of water in excess of the Monthly Basic Allotment can be provided if such supplemental water is available to the cornpany after the company fulfils all other water deliver obligations. ,, The Association understands Pinyon Mesa Phase ll will be developed with thirty-two (32) single famity lots which combined with the forty-eight (48) existing platted lots will complete development of the eighty (80) lots envisioned in the Lower Valley. By means of the letter, the Association acknowtedges the obligation to provide potable water to the thirty-two {32} single family tots. R. A. Sweikert fio- President Elk Springs Homeowner's Association 3/22n6 RE: Pinyon Mesa phase II Dear RE Developm.ent Corp. : The above mentioned development is within the certificated senrice area of Holy crosq Energy. Holy cross Energy has-adequate power supply to provide electric power to the dwelopment,subject to the tariffs, rules and regulationstohr".'e"ypo*otinr enlargennents, relocations,and new extensions necessary to deliver adequate po*." to *o *itt io th" d;I,;p-ent will beundertaken by Holy cross Energy rpor, .o-iletion of appropriate conG"t ai udo*** *asubject to necessary govemmeotal approvals. Please advise when you wish to proceed with the development of the electric system for thisproject. Sincerely, HOLY CROSS ENERGY Chris BilbS Engineering Deparhent ---D Mtro-ffi To: March 2L,20!6 From: Matt Raper Black Hills Energy 0095 County Rd. 150 Glenwood Springs, CO 81501 970-928-0407 David M. Kotz, PE, CFM SGM 118 W Sixth St, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-384-9008 I 97 0-37 9 -97 92 RE: Pinyon Mesa Phase ll Dear David, The above mentioned development is within the certificated service area of Black Hills Energy. Black Hills Energy has existing natural gas facilities located on or near the above mentioned project. At this time it appears that these existing facilities have adequate capacity to provide natural gas service to your project, subject to the tariffs, rules, and regulations on file. Any upgrading of our facilities necessary to deliver adequate service to and within the development will be undertaken by Black Hills Energy upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements and subject to necessary governmental approvals. Please contact us with any questions regarding this project, and with a timeline of when you would like to proceed with your project. Sincerely, Matt Raper Construction Coordinator Black Hills Energy {H CenturyLintr- Strprrger Connectsd* 03t2112016 Attn: David M. Kotz SGM 118 W Sixth St, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 RE: Pinyon Mesa Phase ll To whom it may concern: Your request for facilities to Pinyon Mesa Phase ll is within CenturyLink's serving area and will be provided in accordance with al! the rates and tariffs set forth by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Connections to CenturyLink facilities are contingent upon the customer meeting all the requirements of the Utilities tariffs that are in effect for each requested utility service at the time the application for service is made by the customer and formatly accepted by CenturyLink. Connection requirements may include provisions for necessary line extensions and/or other system improvements, and payment of all applicable system development charges, recovery agreement charges and other fees or charges applicable to the requested service. Although CenturyLink diligently seeks to expand its facilities as necessary to meet anticipated growth, CenturyLink services are provided to etigible customers at the time of connection to the facilities on a "first come, first served" basis after acceptance of the customer's application as described above. !n certain instances, our facilities and capacities may be limited. Accordingly, no specific allocations or amounts of CenturyLink facilities or supplies are reserved for service to the subject property, and no commitments are made as to the availability of CenturyLink service at future times. Sincerely, Jason Sharpe Senior Field Engineer 970-328-8290