Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.0 BOCC Staff Report 09.13.2010Exhibits — Combined Preliminary Flan and Final Plat of the Seaton Subdivision — CPPF 6257 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing (9/13/2010) Exhibit Letter (A to Z) Exhibit A Proof of Publication, Posting, and Mailing B Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended C Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as amended D Application E Staff Memorandum F Staff PowerPoint G Email from Dan Roussin, Colorado Department of Transportation, dated May 26, 2010 H Memo from Jake Mall, Garfield County Road and Bridge, dated June 1, 2010 I Email from Jim Rada, Garfield County Public Health, dated June 10, 2010 J Letter from Ron Biggers, Glenwood Springs Fire Department, dated June 14, 2010 K Email from Steve Anthony, Garfield County Weed Management, dated June 15, 2010 L Letter from Garfield County Development Engineer, dated June 15, 2010 M Letter from Karen A. Berry, Colorado Geological Survey, dated June 16, 2010 N Letter from Craig M. Lis, Division of Water Resources, dated June 29, 2010 0 Memo from Scott Aibner, Garfield County Surveyor, dated July7, 2010 P Pump Test and Water Quality Report by Zancanella and Associates, dated July 12, 2010 Q Cover letter from Karp, Neu, Hanlon, dated August 4, 2010 attached to Water Quality Report by Zancanella and Associates, dated July 30, 2010. P, efo{ 0 F Pa;Cot ic. Ni 0 #1'e. Ft CO,i Fi P -C_Lide n C iLt hlrts 7'10 5 /0 I', I6t(e row BOCC September 13, 2010 MOL PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS REQUEST Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat for CPPF 6257 Seaton Subdivision APPLICANT / OWNER Don and Nanette Seaton REPRESENTATIVE/ENGINEER Deric Walter/Boundaries Unlimited, Inc. LOCATION Adjacent and west of CR 117 and north of CR 125 (Dry Park Road) PROPERTY SIZE 13.156 acres WATER Shared Well SEWER Individual Sewage Disposal System ACCESS County Road 117 EXISTING ZONING Rural I. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION This Application, a "Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat", is for a two lot subdivision. The 13.156 acre (13.22 acres in the application and 13.156 on the plat) site is located south of Glenwood Springs on County Road 117 just north of the CR 117/CR 125 intersection shown on the vicinity map below. The property owner proposes to divide his 13.156 acre parcel into two lots with Lot 2 at 4.448 acres and the remainder, Lot 1 containing 8.609 acres. There is an existing single family home on Lot 1 and an approved Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on Lot 2 which would become a primary residence if the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat are approved. Resolution 2003-05 for the approved ADU is attached in the application as Exhibit E. The ADU is adjacent to CR 117 and located in an upper story of a barn. The drive access crosses Four Mile Creek leading to the single family residence on the proposed Lot 1. The application shows an additional "Tract A" as a dedication to Garfield County for CR 149 (Chelyn Road). The applicant proposes a shared well for the water system which is currently in place and operating along with separate and existing Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. 1 _4 %c NNW Glen o dSpri FwirhFkRmfr h 1' l iE 33 / 1 X34 1 � 1 y, i L. / {__,�,.r""---, 1 `Cbeyn Acres -ntrn nd�r Ewe .ipt SrenSkkr View lti. 1 Che}yn w dre nicer .^..... • 'rsN�W 4 SITE r ./� / 3 N r �.,, Cr &gh'tVew4 A-1 )az�yD : ,• pad..4srringridge place 26 Wes -Thank Ra4r.{ .` .ridge t _ WesrbsnA lNesa C •` General Property Description The approximately 13.156 acre property is located 4 miles south of Glenwood Springs and north of the CR 117/CR 125 intersection. The site has Four Mile Creek running through the site boundaries with the centerline of the Creek as the dividing line between proposed Lots 1 and 2. A portion of County Road 149, Chelyn Road, is adjacent to the north. Site topography varies from the flood plain of Four Mile Creek to steep hillside along the western portion of Lot 1. The site is currently developed with an existing residential unit and ADU with accessory structures. Lot 1 would have the main residential structure and out building with access from the shared drive and single lane bridge over Four Mile Creek. Lot 2 would be located adjacent to CR 117 with the ADU contained in the upper floor of an existing "barn" structure. Portions of both proposed lots have development constraints due to the flood plain with the 35 foot setback delineated from Four Mile Creek on the proposed plat. The eastern 1/2 of the entire parcel contains a mix of pasture and floodplain with adequate building envelopes shown on the plat. Both residential structures currently have water provided by a shared well and separate 1SDS system. Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat The Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 allows a combined Preliminary Plan/Final Plat review "... if the proposed subdivision has seven (7) parcels or less and development of 2 the lots does not require extensive engineering." There are no required improvements to public facilities. In this process, the Planning Commission forwards a recommendation on the Preliminary Plan to the Board of County Commissioners and the Board reviews the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat simultaneously. The Final Plat mylar is then approved and signed by the Chairman at a later date on a consent agenda of the Board. The proposed Preliminary Plan, illustrated in the image below, shows the division of a 13.156 acre parcel into two lots. The western lot (Lot 1) is approximately 8.609 acres in area and contains an existing home with outbuildings. A shared driveway provides access and a single lane bridge, located over Four Mile Creek, connects the residence on Lot 1 to the CR 117 access point. Lot 2 is shown at 4.448 acres in area with existing barn and ADU south of the drive and a future building envelope north of the drive. Access to Lot 2 is directly to CR 117 from the shared drive. Equi PM SEATO.R SUBDIVISION nv..rawu �_� ffis �t.R.wus�wi xoY. cow wee Q.,. 'SL,�I.iw32:��...� :kA : =7,: gin L_ ^_'-__� • 'Th 4 7, ",,, _ SFS ='a'.. II. REFERRAL AGENCIES / DEPARTMENTS Staff referred the application to the following State agencies and / or County Departments for their review and comment. Comments received are briefly mentioned below or are more comprehensively incorporated within the appropriate section of this memorandum. Comment letters are attached and labeled as noted. City of Glenwood Springs Glenwood Springs Fire Protection District (Exhibit J) RE -1 School District Colorado Division of Water Resources (Exhibit N) Colorado Geologic Survey (Exhibit M) Colorado Department of Transportation (Exhibit G) Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 3 Colorado State Forest Service County Road and Bridge Department (Exhibit H) County Vegetation Management (Exhibit K) Garfield County Development Engineer (Contract/Exhibit L) Garfield County Health Department, Environmental Division (Exhibit I) Garfield County Surveyor (Exhibit 0) Utility Providers (US West, Holy Cross Electric) Sopris Soil Conservation District III. GENERAL RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is located in Study Area 1 of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and the proposed division of land is not consistent with the density standards for Study Area 1. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site as Residential Low/10 acres or greater per dwelling unit. The density constraint is primarily due to the steep slopes located on the western one half of the site, the location of Four Mile Creek flowing through the center of the remaining portion of the site, and the lack of utility service. This proposal is to subdivide the parcel into two Tots of 8.609 and 4.448 acres for single-family residential uses. While inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed subdivision does not increase the existing density of residential units on the site if conditioned to restrict approval of any future ADU request. The applicant has not requested approval of Accessory Dwelling Units as part of the Subdivision application and a condition has been added restricting ADU's on this site until such time as the Comprehensive Plan may change to allow increased residential density. This parcel contains a properly permitted primary residence and ADU that were inconsistent with the density standards in place at the time of ADU approval in 2003. The current request to divide the parcel to accommodate the two residential units makes a substantial change in the character of this location within Study Area 1 and consideration to the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan density standards should be given and whether the previous approval of an ADU infers some "back door" to density increases over time. IV. APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE RURAL ZONE DISTRICT The following is an analysis of the proposed development with the required zoning regulations of the Rural Zoning District. Proposed Uses The Applicant proposes dividing 13.156 acres into two lots for an existing single family residence on an 8.609 acre lot and an existing Accessory Dwelling Unit (which will be considered a primary residential unit if approved) of 4.448 acres. The single family residence is a "use by right" in the Rural Zoning District and an ADU is permitted with an administrative review and approyal or with approval as part of a Preliminary Plan and Final Plat. 4 Common Dimensional Requirements Building setbacks within the building envelope on the Preliminary Plan would meet or exceed the requirements of the ULUR (2008). The Rural Zoning District dimensional standards are shown below. Minimum Lot Size: 2 acres. Maximum Lot Coverage: 15% Minimum Setback: Front Yard: (Arterial) Front Yard: (Local Street) Rear yard: Side yard: 50 feet 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet or 1/2 building height Maximum Building Height: 25 feet residential, 40 feet non-residential V. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Subdivision applications are required to adequately address topics in Section 4-502(D) Land Suitability Analysis, Section 4-502(E) Impact Analysis, and the general approval standards for Land Use Change Permits discussed in the first four Divisions of Article 7 Standards; Division 1 General Approval Standards for Land Use Change Permits; Division 2 General Resource Protection Standards; Division 3 Site Planning and Development Standards; Division 4 Subdivision Standards and Design Specifications. The following discussion addresses those standards. Section 4-502(E) Land Suitability Analysis: I. Public Access to Site. Show historic public access to or through the site. 2. Access to adjoining Roadways. Identify access to adjoining roads and site distance and intersection constraints. 3. Easements. Show all easements defining, limiting or allowing use types and access. Staff Comment (For items 1-3): The property has public road access via CR 117 with a shared drive/access road for Lot 1. Since the two residences will access off of this existing drive/road this road will need to become a public road and meet County public road standards of "Primitive Residential." This public road will extend to the gate on Lot 2. Discussion by the Planning Commission included some required changes to the right- of-way width to meet the minimum standards for a "Primitive Residential" roadway width and the Final Plat will need to be adjusted from a 20 foot width to a 30 foot width, or an additional 5 feet on either side of the shared roadway. The existing roadway is paved. 4. Topography and Slope. Topography and slope determination. Staff Comment: The property is evenly split between low land and slope area. The western 1/2 contains slopes up to 30% while the eastern portion contains two relatively flat building areas (with existing structures) and the flood plain for Four Mile Creek. Lot 1 5 will absorb the entire significant slope but no additional building area is proposed on the steep slopes. Lot 2 shows two building sites located north and south of the existing access road/drive with the southern building envelope containing an existing barn with ADU. The significant slopes are identified in the Garfield County Geographic System and shown below in a USGS topographic map. 5. Natural Features. Significant natural features on-site and off- site. Staff Response: The property contains significant slope on the west 1/2 of the proposed Lot 1. Four Mile Creek with associated flood plain divides Lot 1 and Lot 2. 6. Drainage Features. Existing drainages and impoundments, natural and manmade. Staff Comment: Lot 1 drains from the west to east and Lot 2 drains to the west and south. The only significant drainage feature is Four Mile Creek and associated flood plain. 7. Water. Historic irrigation, tailwater issues, water demands, adequate water supply plan pursuant to Section 7-104. Staff Comment: The proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat contains and existing primary single family residence and an approved Accessory Dwelling Unit that share a single approved well, located on Lot 1, for residential water demand. No additional demand is anticipated and additional wells are not proposed. There are no historic irrigation water demands identified and no tailwater issues. Well permits are located in Exhibit C of the application. 8. Floodplain. Flood plain and flood fringe delineations. Staff Comment: The Garfield County Geographic Information System does identify the Four Mile Creek flood plain which is delineated on the Plat Map. 9. Soils. Soils determination, percolation constraints, as applicable. Staff Comment: There are two existing and properly permitted on-site ISDS Systems. New ISDS systems are not proposed. 6 10. Hazards. Geologic hazards on-site, and adjacent to site. Staff Comment: Significant slopes are identified in the Garfield County Geographic System on the western 'A of the proposed Lot 1. No additional development is proposed for Lot 1 which contains an existing single family residence and accessory structure. 11. Natural Habitat. Existing flora and fauna habitat, wetlands, migration routes. Staff Comment: A Vegetation and Wildlife Assessment report is contained in Exhibit D of the application. The document details the flora and fauna located on the site including a weed management plan. The report indicates that impacts to both flora and fauna can be minimized with good management of native vegetation (page 25). 12. Resource Areas. Protected or Registered Archaeological, cultural, paleontological and historic resource areas. Staff Comment: The Application contains a letter (application Exhibit D) prepared by Flattops Archaeological Consultants, dated October 9, 2010, which identifies the Jerome Park Branch of the Colorado Midland Railroad Grade as eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The grade is not identified on the plat though it appears to run southerly along the road right-of-way of CR 117 north of the site and along the ridgeline to the west and partially on the site. There is no proposed site development on the steep slopes and it is recommended that the applicant contact the Colorado State Historic Preservation Office if any artifacts are found. A map showing the railroad grade is shown below. }O( rOS( utii(u,- Caritriu opt'llIJsJ Red-.::_ Canyor Greens pur Cardiff Beckers Overland'° Cattle Creek. CAA Soni Pocahontas Spur IFF BRANCH C.l4! Th -MILE SPUR Sunlight - ht coal mine Jct. Crut opris Brick ;* Bryant Yard Station . Spur *". (Sands} „Valle, Crystal ' ' [PADv ith Wheeler River tuci coal mine Grubbs Marion Hooks ..ANrat_c.3� 7 Section 4-502(E) Impact Analysis: The Impact Analysis shall provide a description of the impacts that the proposed land use change may cause, based upon the standards that the proposed use must satisfy. The Impact Analysis shall include a complete description of how the applicant will ensure that impacts will be mitigated and standards will be satisfied. The following information shall be included in the Impact Analysis. Adjacent Property. An address list of real property adjacent to the subject property, and the mailing address for each of the property owners. Staff Comment: The Applicant provided an address list for property owners within 200 feet of the parcel for public notice which is located in Exhibit A of the application. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1500' radius. Staff Comment: The site is located in an area of rural residential, public lands, and suburban residential development. Public lands are located to the west, the Sunlight View and Lazy Diamond developments are east and northeast, and Chelyn Acres is to the north. Land to the south and south east are rural residential acreage tracts. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. Staff Comment: The site of the proposed Combined Preliminary and Final Plat contains two major site features; Four Mile Creek and associated wetlands and steep slopes on the western portions of Lot 1. No new development is proposed and the site is currently developed with two residential units. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site which have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. Staff Comment: Exhibit B of the application includes a soil study of the site and discusses site limitations on page 9. The site is currently developed and new structures are not shown on the proposed plan. Any future development in the additional building envelope of Lot 2 (north of the access drive) would need to address any site engineering constraints at the time of a building permit application. Geology and Hazard. A description of the geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or man-made hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. Staff Comment: The Garfield County GIS maps identify the western portion of Lot 1 as a moderate area of slope hazard. No development is proposed for this portion of Lot 1. The existing residence and accessory buildings have the potential for rock fall damage though the application notes that no rock fall damage had been identified on the developed area of Lot 1. 8 6. Effect on Existing Water Supply and Adequacy of Supply. Evaluation of the effect of the proposed land use on the capacity of the source of water supply to meet existing and future domestic and agricultural requirements and meeting the adequate water supply requirements of Section 7-104. Staff Comment: The proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat contains an existing primary single family residence and an approved Accessory Dwelling Unit that share a single approved well, located on Lot 1, for residential water demand. No additional demand is anticipated and additional wells are not proposed for this two lot subdivision. Well permits and contracts are in the application Exhibit C. The ULUR requires a test for "quality and quantity" when requesting approval of any Land Use Change Permit. A pump test was a typical requirement of approval for an ADU though Resolution 2003-05 does not list it as a condition nor does the file have a copy of a pump or quality test. The applicant argues (see letter from Leavenworth and Karp in Exhibit C of the application) that a 24 hour pump and water quality test are not required due to the approved well permit and West Divide water contract. The Division of Water Resources does note that a final pump installation report has not been submitted for permit no. 68933-F (with request for an updated permit) with expiration of the permit if the final well test report is not submitted by February 8, 2011 (Exhibit N). No pump test or water quality test were included with the application. A 24 hour pump test report was submitted at the Public Hearing and is labeled Exhibit P. A final water quality analysis and the final pump test, with cover letter, were submitted on August 3, 2010 and are attached as Exhibit Q. The results of both tests demonstrated adequate well capacity to serve the two units and water quality meeting the minimum Colorado Standards. A water softener was recommended due to water hardness and additional water storage would be added if required by the Fire District. 7. Effect on Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface runoff, stream flow and groundwater. Staff Comment: The site is currently developed and contains two residential structures serviced by an existing well on Lot 1 and two separate Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. No additional residences have been proposed and no additional impacts to groundwater or aquifer recharge areas are anticipated. 8. Environmental Effects. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development on those conditions, including: a. Determination of the long term and short term effect on flora and fauna. Staff Comment: A Vegetation and Wildlife Assessment report is contained in Exhibit D of the application. The document details the flora and fauna located on the site including a weed management plan. The report indicates that impacts to both flora and fauna can be minimized with good management of native vegetation (page 25). 9 b. Determination of the effect on significant archaeological, cultural, paleontological, historic resources. Staff Comment: The Application contains a letter (application Exhibit D) prepared by Flattops Archaeological Consultants, dated October 9, 2010, which identifies the Jerome Park Branch of the Colorado Midland Railroad Grade as eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The grade is not identified on the plat though it appears to run southerly along the road right-of-way of CR 117 north of the site and along the ridgeline to the west and partially on the site. There is no proposed site development on the steep slopes and it is recommended that the applicant contact the Colorado State Historic Preservation Office if any artifacts are found. c. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife habitat. (1) Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions. Staff Comment: A Vegetation and Wildlife Assessment report is contained in Exhibit D of the application. The document details the flora and fauna located on the site including a weed management plan. The report indicates that impacts to both flora and fauna can be minimized with good management of native vegetation (page 25) which may improve wildlife habitat. d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. Staff Comment: There are no radiation hazards identified for this site. e. Spill Prevention Control and Counter Measures plan, if applicable. Staff Comment: The Application does not include a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan and this standard does not apply to this existing residential use. 9. Traffic. .Assessment of traffic impacts based upon a traffic study prepared in compliance with Section 4-502(J). Staff Comment: The property has public road access via CR 117 with a shared access road/drive for Lot 1 and each residence will generate 9.5 average daily trips per day. Since the two residences will access off of this existing drive/road this road will need to become a public road and meet "Primitive Residential" road standards. This public road will extend to the gate on Lot 2 and require a 30 foot right-of-way. The existing residential uses will not generate additional traffic beyond two single family residential units. No impact fee is required for this subdivision. A dedication of right-of- way is proposed as "Tract A" on the plat for the existing location of CR 149. However, the County does not except road right-of-way dedications and only request that the Applicants provide a road easement. Final public road easement documents will be submitted and reviewed prior to signing of the Final Plat mylar. Conditions requiring removal of "Tract A" from the plat and submitting a public roadway easement document 10 in standard format have been added. The application will be supplied with the standardized roadway easement language. 10. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations. Staff Comment: This site is an existing rural residential lot with one existing primary residence and one approved Accessory Dwelling Unit. No additional impacts for vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare, or vibration are anticipated for the existing residential uses. 11. Reclamation Plan. A reclamation plan consistent with the standards in Section 7- 212 (B). Staff Comment: This section does not apply. The site currently contains two existing residential structures with no additional units proposed. Article 7 Division 1 General Approval Standards for Land Use Change Permits Section 7-101 Compliance with Zone District Use Restrictions Staff Comment: The proposed subdivision complies with the development standards of the Rural Zoning District of the ULUR of 2008 as amended. Setbacks along CR 117 are shown as 50 feet on the combined plat whereas the requirement for a front yard in the Rural Zoning District is 25 feet when located on a local access road. The applicant has indicated that they wish to correct the setback along CR 117 and it will be shown as 25 feet on the final mylar. Section 7-102 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements The property is located in Study Area 1 of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and the proposed division of land is not consistent with the density standards for Study Area 1. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site as Residential Low/10 acres or greater per dwelling unit. The density constraint is primarily due to the steep slopes located on the western one half of the site, the location of Four Mile Creek flowing through the center of the remaining portion of the site, and the lack of utility service. This proposal is to subdivide the parcel into two lots of 8.609 and 4.448 acres for single-family residential uses. While inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed subdivision does not increase the existing density of residential units on the site if conditioned to restrict approval of any future ADU request. The applicant has not requested approval of Accessory Dwelling Units as part of the Subdivision application and a condition has been added restricting ADU's on this site until such time as the Comprehensive Plan may change to allow increased residential density. This parcel contains a properly permitted primary residence and ADU that were inconsistent with the density standards in place at the time of ADU approval in 2003. The current request to divide the parcel to accommodate the two residential units makes a substantial change in the character of this location within Study Area 1 and consideration to the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan density standards should be given and whether the previous approval of an ADU infers some "back door" to density increases over time. 11 Section 7-103 Compatibility Staff Comment: The site is located in an area of rural residential, suburban residential and public lands. The proposed subdivision will cause minimal compatibility impacts. The proposed use meets the requirements of the ULUR of 2008, as amended. Section 7-104 Sufficient Legal and Physical Source of Water Section 7-105 Adequate Water Supply Section 7-106 Adequate Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems Staff Comment: The proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat contains and existing primary single family residence and an approved Accessory Dwelling Unit that share a single approved well, located on Lot 1, for residential water demand. No additional demand is anticipated and additional wells are not proposed for this two lot subdivision. Well permits and contracts are in the application Exhibit C. The ULUR requires a test for "quality and quantity" when requesting approval of any Land Use Change Permit. A three hour pump test was a typical requirement of approval for an ADU though Resolution 2003-05 does not list it as a condition nor does the file have a copy of a pump or quality test. The applicant argues (see letter from Leavenworth and Karp in Exhibit C of the application) that a 24 hour pump and water quality test are not required due to the approved well permit and West Divide water contract. The Division of Water Resources does note that a final pump installation report has not been submitted for permit no. 68933-F (with request for an updated permit) with expiration of the permit if the final well test report is not submitted by February 8, 2011 (Exhibit N). No pump test or water quality test were included with the application. A 24 hour pump test report was submitted at the Public Hearing and is labeled Exhibit P. A final water quality analysis and the final pump test, with cover letter, were submitted on August 3, 2010 and are attached as Exhibit Q. The results of both tests demonstrated adequate well capacity to serve the two units and water quality meeting the minimum Colorado Standards. A water softener was recommended due to water hardness and additional water storage would be added if required by the Fire District. The Application notes that two Individual Sewage Disposal Systems have been installed to service both residential units. Any new residential structure or enlargement of an existing residence must conform to County ISDS regulations. Section 7-107 Adequate Public Utilities Staff Comment: There are no additional public utilities required for the operation of this site. Section 7-108 Access and Roadways Staff Comment: The property has public road access via CR 117 with a shared drive/access road for Lot 1. Since the two residences will access off of this existing drive/road this road will need to become a public road and meet County public road standards of "Primitive Residential." This public road will extend to the gate on Lot 2. Discussion by the Planning Commission included some required changes to the right -of - 12 way width to meet the minimum standards for a "Primitive Residential" roadway width and the Final Plat will need to be adjusted from a 20 foot width to a 30 foot width, or an additional 5 feet on either side of the shared roadway. The existing roadway is paved. Section 7-109 No Significant Risk from Natural Hazards Staff Comment: The Garfield County GIS maps identify the western portion of Lot 1 as a moderate area of slope hazard and no development is proposed for this portion of Lot 1. The existing residence and accessory buildings have the potential for rock fall damage though the application notes that no rock fall damage had been identified on the developed area of Lot 1. Article 7 Division 2 General Resource Protection Standards Section 7-201 Protection of Agricultural Lands Staff Comment: The subdivision of the site will not adversely affect any surrounding agricultural uses. Section 7-202 Protection of Wildlife Habitat Areas Staff Comment: A Vegetation and Wildlife Assessment report is contained in Exhibit D of the application. The document details the flora and fauna located on the site including a weed management plan. The report indicates that impacts to both flora and fauna can be minimized with good management of native vegetation (page 25) which may improve wildlife habitat. Section 7-203 Protection of Wetlands and Waterbodies Staff Comment: The Garfield County Geographic Information System does identify the Four Mile Creek flood plain which is delineated on the Plat Map with portions of the site located within the 100 year floodplain. The building envelopes shown on the plat map are outside of the Floodplain/Floodway. A Floodplain permit was issued for the private bridge over Four Mile Creek and the primary residence on July 6, 1993 in Resolution 93- 056. Section 7-204 Protection of Water Quality from Pollutants Staff Comment: This is a residential development with existing residential structures. No new residences are proposed and there are no impacts to water quality anticipated. Section 7-205 Erosion and Sedimentation Staff Comment: No significant erosion or sedimentation impacts are anticipated from the existing residential development. Section 7-206 Drainage & Section 7-207 Stormwater Run -Off Staff Comment: The site does not appear to affect drainage or stormwater run off patterns. Any small disturbance for a new residential unit or accessory buildings will have minimal impervious surface and any runoff can be contained on-site. Section 7-208 Air Quality 13 Staff Comment: No air emissions or air quality issues are expected for this proposed subdivision. Section 7-209 Areas Subject to Wildfire Hazards Staff Comment: The site is identified as a "Low" to "Moderate" Wildfire Hazard on the Garfield County Wildfire Hazard Map. Section 7-210 Areas Subject to Natural Hazards and Geologic Hazards Staff Comments: The Garfield County GIS maps identify the western portion of Lot 1 as a moderate area of slope hazard. No development is proposed for this portion of Lot 1. The existing residence and accessory buildings have the potential for rock fall damage though the application notes that no rock fall damage had been identified on the developed area of Lot 1. Section 7-211 Areas with Archeological, Paleontological or Historical Importance Staff Comment: The Application contains a letter (application Exhibit D) prepared by Flattops Archaeological Consultants, dated October 9, 2010, which identifies the Jerome Park Branch of the Colorado Midland Railroad Grade as eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The grade is not identified on the plat though it appears to run southerly along the road right-of-way of CR 117 north of the site and along the ridgeline to the west and partially on the site. There is no proposed site development on the steep slopes and it is recommended that the applicant contact the Colorado State Historic Preservation Office if any artifacts are found. Section 7-212 Reclamation Staff Comment: The site is developed and contains two residential structures and out buildings. This section does not apply. Article 7 Division 4 Subdivision Standards and Design Specifications Section 7-401 General Subdivision Standards A. Preservation of Natural Features. B. Extensions for Future Development. C. Maintenance of Common Facilities. D. Domestic Animal Control. E. Fireplaces. Staff Comment: A building envelope outside of the Four Mile Creek floodplain will preserve the existing wetlands natural habitat of the Creek. There are no extensions of the roadways for future development. Draft road and water sharing agreements are included in Exhibit E of the application. A public road easement will be required for the "Tract A" segment, discussed above, and a public road easement for the shared section of the access roadway will be needed at the time of signing and filing of the Final Plat. Standard plat notes will included on the final mylar plat document which includes restrictions on open fireplaces. There is no requirement for domestic animal control. 14 Section 7-402 Subdivision Lots. A. Developable Lots. B. Lots Conform to Code 1. Appropriate for. Location. 2. Appropriate for Use. C. Lots Have Access to Public Roadways. D. Side Lot Line Alignment. E. Lots Configuration - Cul -de -Sacs. F. Lot Division by Boundaries, Roads or Easements Prohibited. G. Nonconforming Lots Prohibited. H. Multiple -Unit Family Development Prohibited on Single Parcel of Land. Staff Comment: The proposed Combined Preliminary and Final Plat, as conditioned, meets the requirements of the ULUR. Section 7-403 Fire Protection A. Adequate Access Lanes B. Fire Lanes C. Water Sources for Fire Protection D. Fire Hydrants E. Installation by Applicant F. Maintenance Staff Comment: The subdivision application was send to the Glenwood Springs Fire District on May 24, 2010 with comments received in Exhibit J. Conditions have been added to address Fire District comments. Section 7-404 Survey Monuments. A. Monuments Located Within Streets. B. Setting by Standard Construction Techniques. Staff Comment: The final mylar will meet all survey requirements prior to signature by the Board and recordation. The County Surveyor had no comments (Exhibit 0) Section 7-405 Standards for Public Sites and Open Space A. Dedication of Public Land. B. Final Plat Requirements. C. Amount of Public Land Dedicated. 1. Road Dedications. 2. Park Dedication. 3. School Dedications. D. Payment In Lieu of Dedication of Public Sites. Staff Comment: The site contains two existing residential structures and there is no required dedication of public lands for roadways, parks, or schools nor is any payment in lieu of dedication required. The applicant does show dedication of land for a portion of CR 149 located on the site and labeled "Tract A". The County does not accept road right-of-way dedications but rather easements, Tract A will be added into the lot area of Lot 2 and replaced ,with a public roadway easement. A final deed for this segment of roadway will be required, 15 reviewed by staff, and recorded with the Final Plat document along with the road and well sharing agreements. VI. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. That proper publication, public notice, and posting was provided as required by law for the hearing before the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. 2. That the public hearing before the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete; all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted; and that all interested parties were heard at those hearings. 3. That the proposed subdivision of land is not in compliance with the recommended residential densities set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated areas of the County however, the site contains two existing residential structures and a condition has been added to restrict any additional residential units until such time and the Comprehensive Plan is changed. 4. As conditioned, the proposed subdivision of land does conform to the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, and does comply with all applicable Development Regulation as long as the conditions of approval are met. 5. The proposed use is in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. VII. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Discussion during the Planning Commission public hearing included additional requirements for the shared portion of the access road, requirements for "Tract A", and the Visual Analysis provided in the application and the associated visual impacts to CR 117. Both the "Tract A" requirements and roadway standards for the shared roadway have been discussed above and conditions have been added to meet the requirements of the ULUR. The visual impacts were discussed at length by the Planning Commission. The Applicant provided a Visual Analysis with the application for the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat in accordance with the requirements of Article V. The analysis provided photos of the site and concluded that proposed Lot 1 is not in the visual corridor of the road with minimal visual impacts and the proposed Lot 2 has some "minor visual impacts" which have been mitigated by existing landscaping. The Planning Commission expressed concern over any future construction on the additional building envelope area of Lot 2. A condition has been added for an administratively reviewed and approved Vegetation Screening Plan for any future construction on the northern building envelope of Lot 2. The Planning Commission recommends the Board of County Commissioners APPROVE the proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat of the Seaton Subdivision with the following conditions: 16 1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application and as testimony in the public hearings before the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Prior to recording the Final Plat the applicant shall integrate "Tract A" into Lot 2. 3. Prior to recording the Final Plat the applicant shall prepare a Deed conveying the proposed road easement of (labeled as "Tract A") of CR 149 (Chelyn Road) to Garfield County. 4. Prior to recording the Final Plat the applicant shall prepare a Deed conveying the proposed shared access roadway to Garfield County. The shared access road shall be widened to a 30 foot width and include a minimum 12 foot access lane width. r ri u ccs a cc et tif.J2d u.e. 0.6 z i A (es. 5. If a driveway access permit has not been issued for this property a driveway access permit shall be applied for and approved prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 6. The Applicant has noted a non -listed, invasive plant on the site and shall implement control and removal of Crown Vetch (Securigeria veria) from the property as part of the Weed Management Plan. The noxious weeds shall be treated as soon as possible this growing season and particular attention shall be given to Oxeye Daisy and Absinth wormwood. The applicant shall verify that weed management is implemented by providing treatment records prior to Final Plat. 7. Prior to the construction of additional structures on either lot, plans shall be submitted to Glenwood Springs Fire Department to conduct a wildfire hazard site and building plans review. 8. All secured gates on the property shall have a Knox key switch or pad lock installed on them so the fire department can easily open them in an emergency to gain access. A Knox box products application is available from the Glenwood Springs Fire Department. 9. The applicant shall provide a conceptual Vegetation Screening Plan for impacts to CR 117 prior to signing of the Final Plat. The plan may be altered administratively upon application for a building permit for Lot 2. Alteration of the plan may be made to accommodate the design and placement of additional structures and shall be reviewed and approved by County Planning staff. 10. The Applicant shall add the following plat notes to the Final Plat. Accessory Dwelling Units are not permitted in conformance with the current Land Use Designation of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan for the subdivision. Future changes to the Comprehensive Plan may permit additional dwelling units. Future construction on Lot 2 shall conform to the screening requirements of the approved Vegetation Screening Plan. This plan may be altered 17 administratively upon application for a building permit for Lot 2. Alteration of the Vegetation Screening Plan shall be made to accommodate the design and placement of additional structures. VIII. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I make a motion to approve the proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat of the Seaton Subdivision with the recommended findings and conditions." 18 Tom Veric From: Roussin, Daniel[Daniel.Roussin@DOT.STATE.CO.US] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 1:18 PM To: Tom Veljic Subject: Seaton Subdivision Tom — I have no comments. Thanks Dan Roussin Region 3 Permit Unit Manager 222 South 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-683-6284 Office 970-683-6291 Fax 1 EXHIBIT GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department Review Agency Form EXHIBIT Date Sent: May 24, 2010 Comments Due: June 14, 2010 Name of application: Seaton Subdivision Sent to: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the Planning Department in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline. This form may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to: Garfield County Building & Planning Staff Contact: Tom Veljic 109 8th Street, Suite 301 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax: 970-384-3470 Phone: 970-945-8212 General Continents: Garfield County has no objections to this application with the followin comments. If a driveway access permit has not been issued for this property a driveway access ermit shall be a lied for. The drivewa access will be acce ted as it is. The traffic volume is not an issue for this application._ Name of review agency: Garfield County Road and Bridge Department By: Jake B. Mall Date _June 1, 2010 Revised 3/30/00 Tom Veljic From: Jim Rada Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:08 PM To: Tom Veljic Subject: CPPF 6257 - Seaton Subdivision Attachments: Jim Rada(jrada@garfield-county.com).vcf, image001.gif Tom, 1 have reviewed the referenced application. One question: EXHIBIT The applicant states that connection to the public water and sewer systems is not economically feasible yet there is no explanation as to what this means. Other communities that I have worked in have policies that require connection to public water and sewer systems if they are available (usually means within 400 feet of the property line). For properties that have existing ISDS, the sewer connection policy would usually take effect when an existing ISDS fails, or would need to be upgraded or, if additional dwelling units are constructed. All three of these situations could arise on these properties, or at least on lot 2. If a home is planned for the northern part of lot 2 building envelope, care would have to be taken to reserve adequate space for an ISDS, if allowed. Connection to the public water system may not be as easy as just connecting, especially if the homes stay on ISDS. Well permits and augmentation plans may be tied to discharge of wastewater back into the same groundwater system from which it is taken. I believe the sewers in 4 -mile take the wastewater some distance away from this area. If the County has no public utility connection policy then my previous statements are moot and I have no other issues with this application. Thanks for the opportunity to participate in the process. Jim Kacla, K 15 Environmental Health Manager Garfield County Public Health 195 W 14th Street Rifle, CO 81650 Phone 970-625-5200 x8113 Cell 970-319-1579 Fax 970-625-8304 Email jrada cr,garfield-county.com Web www.garfteld-county.com 1 EXHIBIT June 14, 2010 To: Thomas Veljic, Garfield County Planner From: Ron Biggers, Deputy Fire Marshal, Glenwood Springs Fire Department Re: Comments on file number CPPF 6257, applicant Don and Nanette Seaton, contact Deric Walters/Boundaries Unlimited, location adjacent and west of CR117 and north of CR125 The sections addressed below come from the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolutions outline that was submitted by the applicant in their application documents. I did not see a published date on these resolutions. Wildfire: Article VII Division 2 -Resource Protection Standards, Section 7-209 Areas Subject to Wildfire Hazard submitted with the application states this property is not in a sever wildfire hazard area. However, according to the Community Wildfire Protection Plan for the Glenwood Springs Fire District completed by Anchor Point Fire Management Group in April 2004, this property is located in an area that has a very high wildfire danger rating. Therefore, prior to the construction of additional structures on either lot, plans shall be submitted to Glenwood Springs Fire Department to conduct a wildfire hazard site and building plans review prior to construction. Fire Protection Requirements: Article VII, Division 1 -General Standards, Section 7-104, number 5 submitted with the application we agree with, with the following addition: According to the 2009 International Residential Code adopted by Garfield County all one and two family home built on the Tots after January 1, 2013, shall have automatic fire sprinklers installed in them. All gates on the property, if secured, shall have a Knox key switch or pad lock installed on them so the fire department can easily open them in an emergency to gain access. A Knox box products application is available from the Glenwood Springs Fire Department. If you, the applicant, or owners have questions on these comments please contact me, Sincerely, Ronald L. Biggers Deputy Fire Marshal Glenwood Springs Fire Department 970-384-6433 101 WEST 8TH STREET GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970-384-6-180 FAX 970-945-8506 EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM To: Thomas Veljic From: Steve Anthony Re: Comments on the Seaton Subdivision Preliminary Plan Date: June 15, 2010 Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Plan. My comments are as follows: Noxious Weeds • Inventory and mapping -The applicant has provided an inventory and report of county and state listed noxious weeds. A non -listed, invasive plant, Crown Vetch, (Securigeria veria) is also mentioned; in fact the report recommends the control and/or removal of this plant from the property. • Weed Management Staff recommends that the noxious weeds mentioned in the inventory be treated as soon as possible this growing season. This would help reduce some of the seed spread into future disturbed areas. Particular attention should be given to Oxeye Daisy and to Absinth wormwood, this plant has been designated for eradication by the State of Colorado in areas in Garfield County west of the Roaring Fork River. The applicant should follow the recommendations in their submittal and treat the Crown Vetch. Staff requests that the applicant verify that weed management is implemented by providing treatment records prior to July 31, 2010. The county does provide a cost -share program that can assist with weed control expenses. If the applicant is interested, they may contact this office at 625-8601. Please send treatment records to: Garfield County Vegetation Management POB 426 Rifle CO 81650 June 15, 2010 Mr. Thomas Veljie Garfield County Planning 108 8`" Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81 601 JUN f 6 2010 GARFI;LU COUNT`• BUILDING & PLANNING MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND DESIGN I EXHIBIT RE: Review of Combined Preliminary and Final Plat for Seaton Subdivision, CPPF 6257 Dear Thomas: This office has performed a review of the documents provided for the combined Preliminary and Final Plat for Seaton Subdivision. The submittal was found to be thorough and well organized. The review generated the following questions, concerns, or comments: 1. Section 7-207 requires that detention be provided for any "new development" within 100 feet of a waterbody and "any other development "creating" 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area. Since the application proposes to keep the existing status quo with no construction proposed, detention appears not to be required. However, if ADUs area constructed or existing buildings are remodeled, then detention would be required. On the Plan Map there are disclosures for future development. Storm water detention requirements should be included within these notes. 2. A 24-hour pump test is a requirement of Section 7-104.A.2.a. It addresses the water usage for full build out; which would include the two residences plus the two allowed ADUs. The Application submitted a three hour test stating that a full 24-hour pump test is cost prohibitive. This does not appear to be allowed within the Code. 3. A water quality analysis congruent with the requirements of Section 7-104.B.2.d needs to be submitted by the Applicant. Feel free to call if any of the above needs clarification or if you have any questions or comments. S incerely, Mountaipi Cross Eng i er ng, l c. s Hale, PE 826 1/2 Grand Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 PH: 970.945.5544 • FAX: 970.945.5558 • www.mountaincross-eng.com STATE OF COLOR EXHIBIT COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY --serving the people of Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 715 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 866-2611 Fax: (303) 866-2461 June 16, 2010 Mr. Thomas Veljic Garfield County Planning 108 8th Street Glenwood, CO 81601 tveljic@garfield-county.com Re: Deaton Preliminary and Final Plat, CGS GA -10-0006_1 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bill Ritter Governor Michael King Executive Director Vincent Matthews Dear Mr. Veljic: Division Director and State Geologist Thank you for the submittal of the above referenced proposal. The proposal is to subdivide approximately 13 acres into two single-family parcels. Parcel 1 has an existing residence and Parcel 2 contains some improvements, including a drive and accessory structures. The western half of the site contains very steep slopes, potentially unstable slopes, and rockfall hazards. Rocks, as large as small cars, can be found near the two parcels. These hazards do not appear to impact Parcel 2. However, if additional development occurs on Parcel 1, a detailed geologic hazards analysis should be conducted. Depending on what is proposed, a slope stability and rockfall modeling may be required. The Roaring Fork Valley is known for hydrocompactive soil, a dry low-density material that has the potential to collapse when loaded and wetted. This is reflected in the soils report that appears to have been done for the residence on Parcel 1. Before building permits are issued, a site-specific soils and foundation investigation should be done for Parcel 2. The foundation should be designed accordingly. Mitigation for collapsing soil may include overexcavation, proper moisture -condition, and recompaction. Management of surface and subsurface drainage is critical to prevent post -construction damage from collapsing soils. Information provided in the soils report indicates that parts of the site may have shallow ground water. Areas near Four Mile Creek are likely to be most impacted by seasonally high ground water. This and the possibility of shallow bedrock may restrict the construction of a basement on Parcel 2. In summary, the site does contain some severe geologic hazards; however, these should not greatly impact Parcel 2. If new roads or buildings are anticipated in Parcel 1, it would be prudent to evaluate potential rockfall and slope stability hazards. Overall, the applicant has avoided severe hazards. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 1 can be reached at 303.866.2018 or by email at karen.berry@state.co.us. state.co.us. Sincerely, Karen A. Berry Geological Engineer, PG, AICP, CPESC-SWQ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES June 29, 2010 Thomas Veljic Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 Dear Thomas: EXHIBIT 1 Ai Bit] Ritter, Jr. Governor Mike King Executive Director Dick Wolfe, t'.E Director/State Engineer Re: Seaton Subdivision Preliminary Plan and Final Plat Section 3, T7S, R89W 61h PM Water Division 5, Water District 38 We have reviewed the above -referenced preliminary plan to subdivide a parcel of approximately 13.156 acres into two residential parcels of approximately 8.609 and 4.448 acres and one tract of approximately 0.099 acres. The applicant proposes to provide water services through one existing well, the Seaton Well, on proposed Lot 1. The well is operated pursuant to West Divide Water Conservancy District (District) Contract No. FM030123DNS(a). Sewage disposal is to be provided through two individual systems. The Seaton well is operated under Permit No. 68933-F, which was issued pursuant to CRS 37-90-137 (2) for expansion of use from Permit No. 173988. This well is permitted to serve indoor household purposes for up to two single-family residences and two additional dwelling units, irrigation of up to 35,000 sq. feet of home gardens and lawns, and watering of up to 6 domestic livestock. The ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 3.823 acre-feet per year. An augmentation plan to offset depletions caused by the pumping of this well has been established through the West Divide Water Conservancy District. Water rights are noted in the land deed; however none are referenced in the subdivision water supply plan. The source of the claimed pumping rate for this well is the Well Completion and Test Report submitted for Permit No. 173988 in 1994. This data does not necessarily reflect the current production rate of the well. Additionally, a Pump Installation and Test Report ha:, not been filed for Permit No. 68933-F. The continuance of Permit No. 68933-F is subject to the submittal of this report no later than February 8, 2011. Submission of the well test required for this report should also be adequate for our review. The applicant should reference 2 CCR 402- 2(12.2) (see attached), Water Well Construction Rules, for requirements pertaining to pump installation and testing. Based on the above, pursuant to CRS 30-28-136(1)(h)(I). the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights. However, due to a lack of information we are unable to comment on the physical adequacy of the water supply. As indicated above, we recommend that adequate well tests be performed on the well to be used for the water supply and the results evaluated before this preliminary plan is approved. If you or the applicant has any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office for assistance. Office of the State Engineer 1313 Sherman Street, Suite 818 • Denver, CO 80203 • Phone: 303-866-3581 • Fax: 303-866-3589 www.water.state.co.us Thomas Veljic Seaton Subdivision Preliminary Plan and Final Plat Sincerely, June 29, 2010 Page 2 Craig M. Lis, P. Water Resources Engineer CMLIKAAISeaton Subdiv. docx cc: Alan Martellaro, Division Engineer Brian Romig, District 38 Water Commissioner Attachment: Water Well Construction Rules, 2 CCR 402-2(122) Water Well Construction Rules Effective Date: January 1, 2005 11.10.1 Pump installations and cisterns supplying irrigation water where fertilizers, insecticides, herbicides or other chemicals are injected into the water shall be equipped to prevent well or aquifer contamination. The installation shall comply with Section 35-11-107, C.R.S. and the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to the Administration and Enforcement of the Colorado Chemigation Act, 8 CCR 1203-8 (1993), promulgated by the Department of Agriculture pursuant to the Colorado Chemigation Act, Article 11 of Title 35, C.R.S. The referenced material incorporated into this Rule does not include later amendments to or editions of the incorporated material. 11.10.2 Cisterns shall be equipped with anti -siphon device to prevent backflow or discharge from the cistern. 11.11 Disinfection - After installing a pump or cistern and prior to leaving the well site, persons authorized to install pumps shall disinfect the well, pump, and accessible water supply system according to the Provisions of Rule 15. Monitoring and observation holes/wells, dewatering wells, and recovery wells are exempt from this standard if it conflicts with the purpose of the well. RULE 12 WELL TESTING 12.1 General - The provisions of this Rule establish minimum standards for the testing of water wells. Every well constructed for the purpose of producing ground water shall be tested to determine: a. a stabilized yield for the well; and b. the production rate of the equipment installed when the well is placed into service. 12.2 Well Yield Test - The yield of a well shall be determined as a stabilized production rate where the withdrawal rate and the drawdown do not change by more than 10% during the last hour of the test. The test shall demonstrate that either: a. the well is capable of producing the permitted pumping rate; or b, that the maximum yield of the well is less than the permitted production rate. 12.3 Responsibility for Well Yield Test - Well construction contractors are responsible for performing the well yield test and submitting the test data to the State Engineer. If the construction contractor also installs the production equipment, the well yield test may be combined with the production equipment test, provided that the test meets the requirements of Rule 12.2. The construction contractor may forego the well yield test if he can show that a licensed pump installer will perform the well yield test with the permanent production equipment within thirty (30) days of completion of construction of the well. If the pump installation contractor performs the well yield test, he/she shall submit the test information on the Pump Installation and Test Report. 12.4 Production Equipment Test - The production equipment installed in wells shall be tested to ensure it is functioning as designed. The test shall demonstrate the production capacity of the 37 To: Steven Smith - Boundaries Unlimited From: Scott Aibner — Garfield County Surveyor Subject: Plat Review— Seaton Subdivision Date: 07/07/2010 Garfield County SURVEYOR SCOTT AIBNER, P.L.S Dear Steven, Upon review of the Seaton Subdivision plat, I have no comments or corrections to be made prior to approval for survey content and form as Follows: Once all final comments from Building and planning have been completed, the Mylar may be prepared for recording. The Mylar shall be delivered to the Building and Planning office with all private party signatures no Iater than Monday the week prior to the next commissioner meeting day in order to make that meeting. Sincerely, Scott Aibner Garfield County Surveyor cc Tom Veljic — Building and Planning Department 109 8 th Street ,Suite 201 • Glenwood Springs, 0081601 ' (970)945-1377 Fax: (970)384-3460 • e-mail: saibner@garfield-countycom P.O. Box 1908 1011 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 z Z414C414ELL4 4ND 455"0041E5,114C. ENGINEERING CON5ULT4N1f� July 12, 2010 Don and Nanette Seaton 4151 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Seaton: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax Zancanella & Associates, Inc. conducted a 24 hour pump test on your well July 7-8, 2010. We have summarized the purnp test data and water quality results below. The well pumped continuously at a rate of 7.95 gpm for a 24 hour period. The well is situated in the NW% of the SW'/4 of Section 3, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 61" P.M. Refer to Figure 4 to see the approximate location of the well. A copy of the well permit no. 68933-F is attached. The permanent well permit is a fee well permit supported by a West Divide Contract. The proposed contract uses were for 4 EQR using 350 gallons per day (gpd), 6 livestock units and the irrigation of up to one acre. Well Drilling The well was constructed June 30, 1974 at a total depth of 45 feet by Collins Drilling. The well was drilled through clays, boulder, sand and gravel. The Seaton Well was drilled with 6 inch steel casing to a total of 45 feet. The perforated well casing that prevents debris from entering the well casing was set from 32 feet to 45 feet and the steel casing pulled back to 35 feet. Pump Test The static water level prior to the pump test was approximately 6 feet below the top of the well casing. The existing pump was set at 40 feet. This set up allowed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 34 feet (40 minus 6). The pump test began at 12:21 on July 7, 2010 and pumping ended at 12:51 on July 8, 2010 to complete the 24 hour pump period. The test was started at a pumping rate of 7.95 gallons per minute (gpm). The well continued to pump at the 7.95 gpm rate until it was shut off at 1470 minutes. A total of 11695 gallons were pumped over the 24 hour test. Before the test began, a pressure transducer was placed in the Seaton Well. The transducer measured the water level in the well every minute for the duration of the test. The well was tested manually using well sounding equipment to verify the electronic data. The water level curve is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. After 24 hours of continuous pumping, the pump was shut off and the well was allowed time to recover. During the recovery period, water levels were monitored by the transducer placed in the well. Therecovery is shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. The plots of the recovery data show that the water level returned to near static levels within 24 hours. Based on these plots, it can be determined that the water level in the well recovered normally. We believe that the long term yield of the well is likely the 7.95 gpm pumped during the 24 hour pumping test. It may be necessary to have some on-site storage to meet peak demands. A storage tank could also be used to meet residential fire sprinkler demands of the proposed two single family residences, if required. We believe that the well is physically adequate for the purposes shown in the water use estimated for the West Divide Contract attached. The peak month of July would divert 0.65 AF or 4.7 gpm. The pump test was conducted simultaneously while supplying the minimal needs of the residences, which represents the short duration anomalies on the pumping curves. Water Quality Water quality samples were collected and sent to ACZ Analytical Laboratory in Steamboat Springs, Colorado on July 6, 2010. The results of the analysis are pending. A copy of the negative (passed) bacteriological test has been included. • If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please contact our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella Attachments z:110800110807 sealon, don\seaton pump test report.docx Form No: GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 50203 (303) 856-3581 EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 68933 -F DIV. 5 WD38 DES. BASIN MD DON & NANETTE SEATON 4151 CR 117 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601- (970) 928-8208 CHANGE/EXPANSION OF USE OF AN EXISTING WELL APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 3 Township 7 S Range 89 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1325 Ft. from South 800 Ft. from West Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13,NAD83) Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 4Q2-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Constructipn and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2), to expand the use of an existing well constructed under permit no. 173988, appropriating groundwater tributary to the Colorado River, on the condition that this well is operated only when the Four Mile Substitute Water Supply Plan is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. This well is accounted for under WDWCD contract ##FM030123DNS(a). 4) The issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 173988. 5) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single family dwellings, two (2) additional dwelling units, the irrigation of not more than 35,000 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of up to 6 livestock. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. This well is known as SEATON WELL. 6) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 3.823 acre-feet. 8) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with the well permit number and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 9) This well must be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 10) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must a maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. APPROVED SG [Receipt No. 3643961 State Engineer By DATE ISSUED 02-08-2010 EXPIRATION DATE 02-08-2011 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL APPLICANT: 1 WATER USE ESTIMATES FOURMILE SERVICE AREA WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Don and Nanette Seaton 2 DWELLING UNITS: IRRIGATED AREA (SQ FT): NO. OF LIVESTOCK: 3 4 4 35,000 6 5 6 Contract Amount w/ 5% Transit Loss = 2.00 acre feet 7 8 9) Transit Loss= 5.0% 10) (12. In House Diversion per Unit (AF) In House C.U. per Unit (AF) Irrigation Diversion (ft) Irrigation C.U. (ft) In House Diversion (AF) In House C.U. (AF) Irrigation Diversion (AF) Irrigation C.U. (AF) Livestock Diversion & C.U. (AF) Total Diversion (AF) Total C.U. (_AF). Total Contract Amount (AF) 0.033 0.005 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.030 0,005 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.033 0.005 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.032 0.005 0.075 0.060 0.13 0.02 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.21 0.07 0.08 0.033 0.005 0.475 0.380 0.13 0.02 0,38 0.31 0.01 0.55 0.33 0.35 0.032 0.005 0.600 0.480 0.13 0.02 0.48 0.39 0.01 0.65 0.41 0.43 0.033 0.005 0,563 0.450 0.13 0.02 0.45 0.36 0.01 0.62 0.39 0.41 0.033 0.005 0.363 0.290 0.13 0.02 0.29 0.23 0.01 0.45 0.26 0.27 0.032 0.005 0.313 0.250 0.13 0.02 0.25 0.20 0,01 0.41 0.23 0.24 0.033 0.005 0.100 0.080 0.13 0.02 0.08 0.06 0.01 0.23 0.09 0.10 0.032 0.005 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.033 0.005 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.392 0.059 2.488 1.990 1.57 0.24 2.00 1.60 0.07 3.823 1.908 2.004 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 350 gaiSans per day per residence 15% consumptive use for ISDS systems 80% irrigation efficiency for sprinkler systems Blaney Criddle assessment with Pochop adjustments Column (1) *number of dwelling units Column (2)* number of dwelling units Column (3) " irrigated area in acres Column (4) * irrigated area in acres Livestock use at 11 gallons per head per day Column (5) + Column (7) + Column (9) plus 5% transit.loss Column (6) + Column (8) + Column (9) Column (11) plus 5% transit loss Confidentiality Notice: This spreadsheet, including all attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in retance on the contents of the information contained in this spreadsheet is strictly prohibited. Thank you. 2008 Fourmile Water Use Estimaies.xls Job No.: Client: Test By: Analysis By: M.P. = Pump Test Data Table 1 10807 Q= 7.95 gpm r= ft Zancanella & Associates, Inc. S.W.L. = 6.302 ft Josh Currier Top of Casing b= ft Time/Date on: 7/7/2010 12:21 Time/Date off: 7/8/2010 12:51 Test Length: 24:30:53 total time TIME Time (min.) W.L. Measurement (feet) Drawdown (feet) Q (gpm) t' (min) t/t' 7/7/2010 12:21 0 6.302 0 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 12:22 1 6.324 0.022 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 12:23 2 6.31 0.008 7.95 - - 7/7/201012:24 3 6.287 -0.015 7.95 - - 7/7/201012:25 4 6.312 0.01 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 12:26 5 6.311 0.009 7.95 - - 7/7/201012:31 10 9.489 3.187 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 12:36 15 9.117 2.815 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 12:51 30 9.201 2.899 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 13:21 60 12.469 6,167 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 14:00 100 9.141 2,839 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 15:40 200 9.198 2.896 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 17:20 300 9.2 2.898 7,95 - - 7/7/2010 19:00 400 9.182 2.88 7.95 - - 7/7/2010 20:40 500 9.124 2.822 7.95 . - - 7/8/2010 0:50 750 9.006 2.704 7.95 - - 7/8/2010 5:00 1000 8.926 2.624 7.95 - - 7/8/2010 9:10 1250 9.161 2.859 7.95 - - 7/8/2010 10:50 1350 8.927 2.625 7.95 - - 7/8/2010 12:30 1450 8.937 2.635 7.95 - - 7/8/2010 12:50 1470 8.931 2.629 7.95 - - 7/8/2010 12:51 1471 8,94 2.638 7.95 0 - 7/8/2010 12:52 1472 8.396 2.094 0 1 1472.0 7/8/2010 12:53 1473 6.957 0.655 0 2 736.5 7/8/2010 12:54 1474 6.91 0.608 0 3 491.3 7/8/2010 12:55 1475 6.876 0.574 0 4 368.8 7/8/2010 12:56 1476 6.857 0.555 0 5 295.2 7/8/2010 13:01 1481 6.801 0.499 0 10 148.1 7/8/2010 13:06 1486 6.774 0.472 0 15 99.1 7/8/2010 13:11 1491 6.725 0.423 0 20 74.6 7/8/2010 13:21 1501 6.7 0.398 0 30 50.0 7/8/2010 13:36 1516 6.633 0.331 0 45 33.7 7/8/2010 13:51 1531 6.613 0.311 0 60 25,5 7/8/2010 14:21 1561 6.572 0.27 0 90 17.3 7/8/2010 14:51 1591 6.569 0.267 0 120 13.3 7/8/2010 15:51 1651 6.551 0.249 0 180 9.2 7/8/2010 16:51 1711 6.513 0.211 0 240 7.1 7/8/2010 17:51 1771 6.498 0.196 0 300 5.9 7/8/2010 18:04 *1784 6.281 -0.021 0 313 5.7 . 10 15 20 Figure 1 Seaton Well Pump Test Water Levels and Pump Rate 1L-17. 25 r m 30 35 40 45 0 -2 O ON 00 00 N'1" \�0,�0 1O 1\O Seaton Well ----Total Depth --- — Pump Rate 7 -8 9 7 • S{ 0 1.0 0 un 0 141 0 un 0 r- r- ' CV N ch M d' [4] lanai JaleM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,- 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 E 22 a m 2.5 3 3.5 4 1 Figure 3 Seaton Pump Test Residual Recovery [Water Level vs. tlt'] 10 100 tI' 1000 10000 • (../ tJ. f ' 1 ./1 n 5.. C`\ r line?STS 4C. [1� t (J AL WELL LOCATION MAP FIGURE NO. .SCALE: 1" r, 2000' DATE: JULY 12, 20t0 SHEET: 1 OF 1 RAWN BY: RVFG CHKD BY; J1 C APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: SEE FOOTER DON SEATON, ZANCANELLA ANO ASSOC/A TES /NC. NC/N %N C'NSUL AN S POST 0R1Cf BOx 1908 — 1011 G11AND AVENUE PROJECT: G1.EN55000 SPRINGS, COLORADO 05602 {920) 913-5200 10807 Customer Zancanella & Associates 1011 Grand Ave Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Mesa County Health Department Regional Laboratory 510 295 Rd, Grand Junction, CO 81504 US Mail: PO Box 20,000, Grand Junction, CO 81502-5033 (970) 248-6999 fax (970) 683-6608 http:/lhealth.mesacounty.us/lab Sample Invoice # 2453-10 Date Time Collected By Collected 07/06/2010 2:00 PM Ryan Gray System Seaton Received 07/07/2010 10:48 AM 4151117 Rd Matrix Drinlzing Water Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Purpose Special Purpose Chlorine Location 4151117 Rd Comments Test Name Total coliforms PA Result ABSENT Coliform/ABSENT E. coli or Tess than one (1), indicates a microbiologically safe sample Invoice for Water Sampling Services Deft -el -116616'6d Payment ;Type ue Amount Paid ,'Balance 07/07/2010 Bill 08/0712010 $0.00 $20.00 :;Customer;. (95) Zancanella & Associates ,A Amour nc` •ie' . MCHD Regional Lab PO Box 20,000 Grand Junction, CO 81502-5033 07/08/2010 7:54:02 AM Detach and mail this portion with payment Invoice,#. 3 10r If paying for multiple samples, write Invoice #'s below: • Chect (Payable to MCHD) (] Credit Card: Visa Mastercard Name on Card: Billing Address: Credit Card #: Expiration Date: Security Code: Ka rp. Neu_FIAaQn IYom August 3, 2010 Via US, Mail Sander N. Karp James S. Neu Karl J. Hanlon Michael J. Sawyer James F. Fosnaught Fred A. Jarman, AICP Garfield County Building and Planning Director 108 8111 Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Seaton Subdivision Dear Fred: Anna S ltcnberg Cassia R. Furman Jennifer M. Smith T. Damien Zunabrennen Jeffrey J. Conklin P.FA 201 lel Street, Suite 200 P. O. Drawer 2030 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Telephone: (970) 945-2261 Facsimile: (970) 945-7336 wivw.mountainl awlirm.com Michael J. Sawyer najs.r mountainlawlinn.coan D IT AUG 0 4 ZeIG .r`,1''1v:. i�111 1 1 represent Don and Nannette Seaton with regard to the subdivision oftheirproperty up Four Mile Road. Previously, with regard to this subdivision, I have submitted information related to the water rights to be used for the two lots. One of the conditions of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission was to provide adequate documentation that the water source (the well) meets water quality standards and produces adequate supply for the proposed subdivision. Attached to this letter are two (2) reports from Zancanel la & Associates dealing with water quality and quantity from the Seaton well. As you will note, the Seaton well meets all of the primary maximum contaminant level requirements scrutinized under the Garfield County Code. As such, the well produces water of a quality that meets Garfield County and State of Colorado standards. Also attached to this letter is a Pump Test Report from Zancanella indicating that the well produces an adequate supply of water to meet the needs of a two -lot subdivision. With the submittal of this information, we request that final approval of the subdivision be recommended absent a condition related to water quality or quantity issues. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Tom Zancanella. Very truly yours, KARP NEU HANLON, RC. clfae`1'J. Sawyer MJS:jac enclosure(s) cc: Don and Nannette Seaton Deric Walter, Boundaries Unlimited Tom Zancanella P.O. Box 1908 1011 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Z4NC4NELL4 4110 4S5OCI4TES, IMC. ENGINEERING CONSULT4Plt5 July 30, 2010 Don and N ette Seaton 4151 Cou ty Road 117 Glenwo Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Seaton: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax Attached are the water quality results received from ACZ Analytical Laboratory that were collected during the pump test. None of the parameters required by the Garfield County Subdivision regulations exceeded the EPA's Primary Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). However, there were three secondary parameters that exceeded the standard; aluminum, iron, and hardness. You may want to consider a water softener. If you have any questions, please contact our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. --Itfel-44644 76444/v/25:140V9 Thomas A. Zancanella P.E. Attachments Jcc: Michael Sawyer z:\10800110807 seaton, donlseaton water quality.docx Zancanelta & Associates, Inc. 2:110800\10807 Seaton, Don\WaterQualitySummary RawDrinkingLongAnalysis 7130/2010 Raw Water Quality Analysis Seaton Well Test No. Analyte Category Classification Regulation Units Detection Level Result Standard Status 1 Aluminum Metal Inorganic Secondary mg/L 0.003 0.48 0.20 N/A 2 Antimony Metal Inorganic Primary mg/L 0.002 Below DL 0.0060 Pass 3 Arsenic Metal Inorganic Primary mgIL 0.004 Below DL 0.010 Pass 4 Barium Metal inorganic Primary mg/L 0.01 0.179 2.0 Pass 5 Beryllium Metal Inorganic Primary mg!L 0.001 Below DL 0.0040 Pass 6 Cadmium Metal Inorganic Primary mgfL 0.0005 Below DL 0.0050 Pass 7 Calcium Metal Inorganic None mg/L 0.41 102 N/A N/A 8 Chromium Metal Inorganic Primary mgfL 0.01 Below DL 0.1000 Pass 9 Copper Metal Inorganic Primary mg/L 0.01 Below DL 1.3000 Pass 10 Iron Metal Inorganic Secondary mglL 0.2 0.93 0.30 N/A 11 Lead Metal Inorganic Primary mg/L 0.0025 0.0005 0.0150 Pass 12 Magnesium Metal Inorganic None mg/L 0.5 26.1 N/A NIA 13 Manganese Metal Inorganic Secondary mg/L 0.005 0.036 0.050 Pass 14 Mercury Metal Inorganic Primary mg/L 0.001 Below DL 0.0020 Pass 15 Nickel Metal Inorganic Informal mg/L 0.01 Below DL 0.10 Pass 16 Silver Metal Inorganic Secondary mg/L 0.0005 Below DL 0.10 Pass 17 Sodium Metal Inorganic None mg/L 2.5 37.1 N/A NIA 18 Thallium Metal Inorganic Primary mg/L 0.001 Below DL 0.0020 Pass 19 Zinc Metal Inorganic Secondary mg/L 0.05 Below DL 5.0 Pass 20 Chloride Nonmetal Inorganic Secondary mg1L 0.5 Below DL 250 Pass 21 Cyanide Nonmetal Inorganic Primary mgfL as CN- 0.005 Below DL 0.20 Pass 22 Fluoride Nonmetal Inorganic Primary mg1L 0.2 Below DL 4.0 Pass 23 Selenium Nonmetal Inorganic Primary mgfL 0.002 0.0019 0.050 Pass 24 Sulfate Nonmetal Inorganic Secondary mgfL 0.5 90 250 Pass 25 Nitrate Oxidized Ammonia Inorganic Primary mgfL as N 0.01 0.69 10.0 (Category Total) Pass 26 Nitrite Oxidized Ammonia Inorganic Primary mg/L as N 0.004 0.69 1.0 Pass 27 Alkalinity, Bicarbonate Wet Chemistry Inorganic None mg/L as CaCO3 5 304 N/A N/A 28 Alkalinity, Total Wet Chemistry Inorganic None mg/L as CaCO3 5 304 N/A N/A 29 Calcium Carbonate Wet Chemistry Inorganic None mg/L 1 Below DL N/A N/A 30 Conductivity, Q 25°C Wet Chemistry Inorganic None HS/cm 1 783 N/A N/A 31 Hardness Wet Chemistry Inorganic Informal rng/L as CaCO3 1 362 300 N/A 32 pH Wet Chemistry Inorganic Secondary Standard Units 0.01 7.8 6.5 < pH < 8.5 Pass 33 Temperature, Test Wet Chemistry Inorganic None °C 0.1 N/A N/A 34 Total Dissolved Solids Wet Chemistry Inorganic Secondary mg/L 10 500 500 Pass 35 Coliforms, Total (MPN) Bacterium Microorganism Primary MPN/100mL 1 <1 0 Pass 36 Escherichia Coli (MPN) Bacterium Microorganism Primary MPN/100mL 1 <1 0 Pass 37 Gross Alpha Activity Particle Radionuclide Primary pCi/L 1.2 4.1 15.0 Pass 38 Gross Beta Activity Particle Radionuclide Primary pCi/L 2.0 6.1 50.0 (Trigger Level) Pass 39 Radium 226 Radium Radionuclide Primary pCi1L 0.1 0.19 5.0 (Category Total) Pass 40 Radium 228 Radium Radionuclide Primary pCi/L 0.7 0.34 5.0 (Category Total) Pass 41 Uranium Uranium Radionuclide Primary mgfL 0.0007 4.6 30.000 Pass Zancanelta & Associates, Inc. 2:110800\10807 Seaton, Don\WaterQualitySummary RawDrinkingLongAnalysis 7130/2010 187B* Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance monitoring requirements? YES Dor NO Is this a check or confirmation sample? ❑ YES 10 NO PWSID COO COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEMS NAME: Don and Nanette Seaton c/o Zancanella & Associates DATE COLLECTED: 07 / 06 / 2010 SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS:1011 Grand Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box CITY STATE CONTACT PERSON: Ryan Gray PHONE: (970 ) 945-5700 ZIP SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:RYan Gray TIME COLLECTED: 2:00 pm am/pm ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLE ❑ SOURCE WATER SAMPLE FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated ❑ Other Treatment ❑ Finished—Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) 12 STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Seaton Well DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES ❑ NO I NOTE: CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: CLIENT NAME or ID# Zancanella & Associates LABORATORY NAME ACZ Laboratories LAB PHONE #: (970 ) 879-6590 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY07 107 / 2010 COMMENTS. The client did not provide information for spaces that were left blank. PARAMETER RESULT in (mg/L) MCL in (mg/L) STANDARD METHOD Lab Report Limit (mg/L) Lab MDL in (mg/L) Date Analyzed Antimony BDL 0.006 M200.8 0.002 7/17/10 Arsenic BDL 0.010 M200.8 0.002 7117/10 Barium 0.179 2 M200.7 0.02 7/15/10 Beryllium BDL 0.004 M200.7 0.01 7/15/10 Cadmium BDL 0.005 M200.7 0.02 7/15/10 Chromium BDL 0.1 M200.7 0.05 7/15/10 Cyanide BDL 0.2 M335.4 0.01 7/12/10 Fluoride BDL 4.0 SM4500F-C 0.5 7/15/10 Mercury BDL 0.002 M245.1 0.001 7/20/10 Nickel BDL ** M200.7 0.05 7/15/10 Selenium 0.0019 0.05 M200.8 0.0003 7/23/10 Sodium 37.1 ** M200.7 2 7/15/10 Thallium BDL 0.002 M200.8 0.0005 7/17/10 ** Monitoring is required, but there is no MCL for this contaminant Codes used: NT = Not tested for compound Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Level Sue W.bnar has r.M wd and oweved Lida repot mg/L = Milligrams per liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. Lab Report Limit = Level of Quantitation (LOQ). Project Manager Reviewed & Approved by Title MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 07 /27 /2010 Date FAX: 303-782-0390 224 of 25 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Section REPORTING FORM FOR RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSIS PWSID COO SYSTEMS NAME: Don and Nanette Seaton c/o Zancanella & Associates SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1011 Grand Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box CITY CONTACT PERSON: Ryan Gray LABORATORY SAMPLE #: L83101-01 Is this a composite sample? STATE ZEP PHONE: (970 ) 945-5700 YES ❑ NO ❑✓ (Only samples composited BY THE LABORATORY may be used for compliance.) DATE COLLECTED: 07 / 06 / 2010 TIME COLLECTED: 2:00 Pm am/pm DATE COLLECTED: / / TIME COLLECTED: am/pm STATE SAMPLING POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Seaton Well • Entry Point to the Distribution System (Finished Water) Sample ❑ • Source Water Sample © (Raw Water samples cannot be used for compliance) LABORATORY NAME ACZ Laboratories, Inc. LAB PHONE #: ( 970 ) 879-6590 CLIENT NAME or ID# Zancanella & Associates DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 07 / 07 / 2010 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Ryan Gray COMMENTS: The client did not provide information for spaces that were left blank, Highlighted rows are for state use onl PARAMETER RESULT UNITS MCL STANDARD METHOD LAB MDL REGULATORY MDL DATE ANALYZED (4000.:; , _ _. . PC1/L. iP µCAL Gross Alpha (4002) 4.1 pCi/L 15 pCi/L M900.0 2.1 pCl/L 3 PCl/l-, 7/12/10 Uranium (4006) 4.6 pg/L 30 µg/L M200.8 0,5 pg /I-. 1 pg /L 7/17/10 Radium 226 (4020) 0.19 pCi/L 5 pCi/L, M903.0 0.17 pCi/L 1 pCi1L 7/22/10 Radium 228 (4030) 0.34 pCi/L 5 pCi/I, M904.0 0.61 pCi/L 1 pCi/L 7/14/10 (4010) pCi/L 5 pCi/L Gross Beta (4100) 6.1 pCi/L 4 mrem/yr M900.0 3.7 pCi/L 4 µCif- 7/14/10 Total Dissolved Solids (1930) 500 mg/L SMCL* = 500 mg/L SM2540C 20 mg/L N/A 7/7/10 Secondarlly,, Maximum Contaminant Level--Non-Enforceable Standard Sue ..1.,1C1 Project Manager 07/27/2010 Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD OR FAX RESULTS TO: 303-758-1398 ATTN: CADM 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 Rad Report Form Version 7 020108 Page 25 of 25 ADZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 Zancanella & Associates Project ID: Sample ID: SEATON WELL ACZ Sample ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sample Matrix: L83101-01 07106110 14:00 07107110 Drinking Water Wet Chemistry tfi ii ;' ` s'' f' iesulk Qua( (C z..s, 'Dat?. , F :,Analysf Alkalinity as CaCO3 Bicarbonate as CaCO3 Carbonate as CaCO3 Hydroxide as CaCO3 Total Alkalinity Chloride Conductivity @25C Corrosivity (calc.) Cyanide, total Fluoride Hardness as CaCO3 Lab Filtration Lab Filtration & Acidification Nitrate as N, dissolved Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved Nitrite as N, dissolved pH (lab) pH pH measured at Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C Sulfate SM232013 - Titration SM4500CI-E SM2510B SM 2330 - CaCO3 SI M335.4 - Colorimetric wl distillation S M4500 F -C SM2340B - Calculation SM 3030 B SM 3030 B Calculation: NO3NO2 minus NO2 M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction SM4500H+ B SM2540C SM4500 SO4-D 304 U 304 U 783 No Temp U U 362 0.69 0.69 7.8 22.0 500 90 mgIL mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L umhoslcm SI Unit * mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mgIL U • mg/L H units C mgIL mg/L 20 07/13/10 0:00 20 07/13/10 0:00 20 07/13/10 0:00 20 07/13/10 0:00 5 07/16/10 13:41 10 07/13/10 18:04 07/27/10 0:00 0.01 0711211015:54 0.5 07/15110 12:15 7 07/27/10 0:00 07/07/10 14:43 07/08/10 8:11 0.1 07/27/10 0:00 0.1 07/07/10 21:30 jlf jlf jlf jlf ami jlf calc itk jjc calc jjc cra calc pjb 0.05 07/07/10 21:30 pjb 0.1 071151100:00 0.1 07/15/10 0:00 20 07/07/10 16:13 jjc jjc tcd 50 07/09/10 12:15 Ihb REPIN.02.06.05.01 * Please refer to Qualifier Reports for details. The RL for this project equals the ACZ PQL. Page 3 of 25 PROOF OF PUBLIC NOTICE AND CERTIFICATE OF MAILING DON AND NANETTE SEATON I HEREBY AFFIRM THAT Public Notice requirements of Garfield County have been met for the Public Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to be held on September 13, 2010. In addition, I hereby affirm that on July 28, 2010, a true copy of the attached Public Notice was mailed, by placing the same postage prepaid in the United State Mail, first class, certified return receipt, at Glenwood Springs, Colorado, addressed to all surrounding property owners within 200 feet of the subject property and owners of mineral interests in the property and as shown on the attached list. Attached are: 1. Certificates of Mailing (green cards and return receipts). 2. Proof of Publication from the Rifle Citizen Telegram for the Public Notice published on July 29, 2010. 3. List of names and mailing addresses of all surrounding property owners within 200 feet of subject project and owners of mineral interests in the property. 4. Pictures of the Public Notice sign that was posted at the property on July 27, 2010. Dated this 714day of , 2010. 1 /2 Aal At t " ael J. r a , e', By: I:1Clients\Seaton, Don-414311)ublic Hearing\Proof of Public Notice & Cert of Mailing 9-13-2010.wpd PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that Don and Nanette Seaton have applied to the Board of County Commissioners, Garfield County, State of Colorado, for a combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat application for the Seaton Subdivision, a property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado; to -wit: Legal Description: (See attached) Practical Description: The 13.22 acre property is Located adjacent and west of County Road 117 and north of County Road 125 (Dry Park Road) in Section 3, Township 7 South, Range 89 West in Garfield County. This Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat application requests approval to subdivide the 13.22 acre parcel into two residential lots of 8.609 acres and 4A48 acres, all within the Rural Zoning District. All persons affected by the proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. If you can not appear personally at such hearing, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Board of County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to grant or deny the request. The application may be reviewed at the office of the Planning Department located at 108 8th Street, Suite 4.01, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A public hearing on the application has been scheduled for the 13th day of September, 2010, at 1:15 P.M. in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, 81601. Planning Department Garfield County PARCEL A: A parcel of land situated in the WY2SW 1/4 of Section 3, Township 7 South. Range 89 Nest of the Sixth Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the Westerly line of said Section 3 and Westerly of the center of Four Mile Creek, said parcel of land is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of said Section 3, whence the Section Corner common to Sections 3,4,9 and 10 in said Township and Range bears: S. 01°01'32" E. 1588.87 feet; thence East 936.78 feet to a point in the center of said Creek; thence S. 17°24'43" W. 53.78 feet along the center of said Creek; thence S. 14°55'37" E. 93.36 feet along the center of said Creek; thence S. 32°18'37" W. 93.14 feet along the center of said Creek; thence S. 01°34'29" W. 33.68 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 89°30'00" W. 280.65 feet; thence S. 00°30'00" W. 152.00 feet; thence N. 89°30'00" W. 604.95 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Section 3; thence N. 01°01'32" N. 398.24 feet along the Westerly line of said Section 3 to the point of beginning. PARCEL B: A parcel of land situated in the W%SW 114 and in the NE1/4SW I/4 of Section 3, Township 7 South. Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of the Four Mile Creek County Road and Southerly of the Southerly line of the Chelyn Acres Subdivision as platted, said parcel of land is described as follows: Beginning at a point, whence the Section Corner common to Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10 in said Township and Range bears: N. 89°30'00" W. 604.95 feet and S. 01°01'32" E. 1190.63 feet; thence N. 00°30'00" E. 152.00 feet; thence S. 89°30'00" E. 280.65 feet to a point in the center of Four Mile Creek; thence N. 013429" E. 33.68 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 32°18'37" E. 93.14 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 14°55'37" W. 93.36 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 17°24'43" E. 53.78 feet along the center of said Creek; thence East 90.60 feet along the Southerly line of said Chelyn Acres Subdivision; thence N. 31°40'48" E. 36.73 feet; thence N. 47°08'54" E. 41.71 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N.13°35'14" N. 52.92 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 37°2126" E. 42.09 feet along the center of said Creek; thence S. 84°43'06" E. 116.64 feet; thence 110.04 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 173.50 feet, the chord of which bears N. 81°37'02" E. 108.21 feet; thence 254.50 feet along the arc of a curve to the Ieft, having a radius of 330.00 feet, the chord of which bears N. 41021'12" E. 24.8.24 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence S. 11°38'50" W. 186.10 feet along the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence S. 31°09'121' W. 465.29 feet along the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence 259.80 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 818.60 feet, the chord of which bears S. 22°03'41'W N. 258.71 feet; thence S. 12°58'10" N. 137.24 feet along the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence N. 52°56'57" W. 318.94 feet; thence N. 89°30100" W. 188.00 feet to a point of beginning. (Exhibit A) A parcel of land situated in the NW1/4SW 114 of Section 3, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, lying Westerly of the center of Four Mile Creek. Said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of said Section 3, also being a point at the Northwest corner of a parcel described as Parcel "A" in a document recorded in Book 717 at Page 774 of the Garfield County records whence a Garfield County surveyor brass cap found in place and properly marked for the Southwest Corner of Section 3 of said Township and Range bears S 01°01132" E, 1604.72 feet; thence along said Parcel "A" N 90°00100" E, 936.78 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Parcel "A" also being a point on a parcel described as Parcel "B" as described in a document recorded in Book 717 at Page 774 of the Garfield County records; thence N 90°00100" E. 90.60 feet to a point in the center of Four Mile Creek. also being a point on a parcel described in document recorded in Book 619 at Page 706 of the Garfield County records; thence continuing along said center of Four Mile Creek and said document recorded in Book 619 at Page 706 of the Garfield County records N 31040'48" E, 17.33 feet; thence leaving said center of Four Mile Creek S 90°00100" W, 1036.75 feet to the Westerly line of said Section 3; thence along the Westerly line of said Section 3 S 01°01132" E. 14.75 feet to the point of beginning. said parcel containing 0.349 acres, more or Tess. County of Garfield, State of Colorado Mark W. Spidell Elizabeth Flood 4339 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 William L. Flood Nancy C. Flood 4337 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Angela Grace Dimercurio Simpson Michael David Simpson 751 Van Dorn Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 John A. Groth Colleen B. Groth 4264 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Kenneth 0. Beckwith Kathy Beckwith 4456 Organ Mesa Loop Las Cruces, NM 88011 Joel D. Halonen Sarah N. Simonson Brent Simonson 2585 Woodbury Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Gregory B. Denney Laura C. Denney 370 Meadow Wood Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Larry Kindall Bernice M. Kindall 1259 County Road 113 Carbondale, CO 81623 C; 1Clienls\Seaton, Don-41431Public Hearing\Property Owner List.wpd Benjamin T. Lunt Nicole G. Lunt 310 Meadow Wood Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Sunlight View 11 Homeowners Association P. O. Bx 2659 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Michael A. Mayer Hildur Y. Troyer 4341 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Black River Royalties, LLC 1645 Court Place, Suite 326 Denver, CO 80202 White River Royalties, LLC 4194 S. Valentia Street Denver, CO 80237 E. R. Axthelm Co., a Partnership 4264 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 C. E. Axthelm Co., a Partnership 4264 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dan C. Wadsworth Margaret Wadsworth P. 0. Box 4173 Sunriver, OR 97702 Bureau of Land Management 50629 Highway 6 & 24 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 5349442 PROOF OF PUBLICATION RIFLE CITIZEN TELEGRAM STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF GARFIELD I, Jenna Weatherred, do solemnly swear that I am a Publisher of The Rifle Citizen Telegram, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7129/2010 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/29/2010 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this 29th day of July 2010. Jenna Weatherred, Pub sher Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this 2911 day of July 2010. Mary E. Bkenhagen, Notary Public My Commission expires: August 27, 2011 Karp Neu Hanlon, PC-(legals & Classified G RY E. BORKENHAGEN Ex ;r 9s 0812712011 TAKE NOTICE that Don and Nanette Seaton have applied to the Board of County Commissioners, Garfield County, State of Colorado, for a combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat application for the Seaton Subdivision, a property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado; to -wit: Legal Description: PARCEL A: A parcel of land situated in the W'ASW14 of Section 3, Township 7 South. Range 89 Nest of the Sixth Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the Westerly line of said Section 3 and Westerly of the center of Four Mile Creek, said parcel of land is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of said Section 3, whence the Section Comer common to Sections 3,4,9 and 10 in said Township and Range bears: S. 01°01'32'1E. 1588.87 feet; thence East 936.78 feet to a point in the center of Said Creek; thence S. 17°24'43" W. 53.78 feet along the center of said Greek; thence S. 14°5527" E. 93.36 feet along the center of said Creek; thence S. 32°18'37" W. 93.14 feel along the center of said Creek; thence S. 01°3429" W. 33.68 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 89°30'00" W. 280.65 feet thence S. 00°30'00" W. 152.00 feet; thence N. 89`30'00" W. 604.95 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Section 3; thence N. 01°01132" N. 398.24 feel along the Westerly line of said Section 3 to the point of beginning. PARCELS: A parcel of land situated in the WYZSW'R and in the - NE36SW O of Section 3, Township 7 South. Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, lying Westerly of the Westerlyright of way line of the Four Mile Creek County oad and Southerly of the Splatted, sai` ine of the Chelyn Acres StbdivIsion s d parcel of and is describ d asfollows: Beginning at a point, whence the Section Comer Common to Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10 in said Town- ship and Range bears: N. 89°30'00" W. 604.95 feet and S. 01°01'32' E. 1190.63 feet; thence N. 00°30'00" E. 152.00 feet; thence S. 89°30'00" E. 260.65 feet to a point in the center of Four Mile Creek; thence N. 01°34'29" E. 33.68 feet along the center of said Creek; thence 14. 32°18'37" E. 93.14 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 14°55'37" W. 93.36 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 17°24'43" E. 53:78 feet along the center of said Creek; thence East 90.60 feet along the Southerly line of said Chelyn Acres Subdivi- sion; thence N. 31°40'48" E. 36.73 feet; thence N. 47°08'54" 5. 41.71 feel along the center of said Creek; thence 14.13°35'14' N. 52.92 feet along the center of said Creek; thence N. 37°21'26" E. 42.09 feet along the center of said Creek; thence S. 84°43'06" E. 116.64 feet; thence 110.04 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 173.50 feet. the chord of which bears N. 81°37102" E. 108.21 feet; thence 254.50 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 330.00 feet, the chord of which bears N. 41°...21'12" E. 248.24 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way lineof said County Road; thence S. 11°38'50' W. 186.10 feet along the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence S. 31"09'12" W. 465.29 feet along the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence 259.80 feet along the arc of a curve to the lett, having a radius of 818.60 feet, the chord of which bears S. 22°03'41'W N. 258.71 feet; thence S. 12°58'10" N. 137.24 feet along the Westerly right of way line of said County Road; thence N. 52°56'57" W. 318.94 feet; thence N. 89°30'00" W. 188.00 feet to a point of beginning. A -parcel of land situated in the NW1i4SW1,14 of Section 3, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, lying Westerly of the center of Four Mile Greek. Said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a ;point on the Westerly line of said Section 3, also being a point at the Northwest corner of a parcel described as Parcel "A' in a document recorded in Book 717 at Page 774 of the . Garfield County records whence a Garfield County surveyor brass cap found in place and properly marked for the Southwest Corner of Section 3 of said: Township and Range bears S 01°01'32" E. 1604.72 feet; thence along said Parcel 'A' N 90°00'00' E, 936.78 leet to the Northeast Corner of said Parcel "A" also being a point on a parcel. described as Parcel 'B' as described in a document recorded in Book 717 at Page 774 of the Garfield County records; thence N 90°00'00" E. 90.60 feet to a point in the center of Four Mile Creek. also being a point 011 a parcel described in document recorded in Book 619 at Page 706 of the Garfield County records; thence continuing along said center of Four Mile Creek and said document recorded in Book 619 at Page 706 of the Garfield County records N 31°40'48' E, 17.33 feet; thence leaving said center of Four Mile Creek S 90°00'00- W, 1036.75 feet to the Westerly line of said Section 3; thence along the Westerly line of said Section 3 S 01°01'32" E. 14.75 feet to the point of beginning. said parcel containing 0.349 acres, more criess. County of Garfield, State of Colorado Practical Description: The 13.22 acre property is located adjacent and west of County Road 1 17and north of County Road 125 (Dry Park Road) in Section 3, Township 7 South, Range 89 West in Garfield County. This Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat application requests approval to subdivide the 13.22 acre parcel into two residential lots of 8.609 acres and 4.448 acres, all within the Rural Zoning District. All persons affected by the proposed Combined Preliminary Plan and Final Plat are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. 11 you can not appear personally at such hearing, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Board of County Commissioners will give con- sideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to grant or deny the request. The application may be reviewed at the office of the Planning 'Department located at 108 8th Street. Suite 401, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colora- do between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,_ Monday through Friday. A public hearing on the application has been scheduled for the 13th day of September, 2010, at 1:15 P.M. in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 8111 Street, Glenwood Springs, Colrado, 81601. oDepartment Garfield County Published in the Citizen Telegram on July 29, 2010. [539442) a L r7 u 7 D M ru co rR 0 D •ru ru rr- C U.5 Postal Service,i CERTIFIED:MAIL,h, RECEIPT (Domestic Mai! Only, Flo Insurance'Coverage Provided) for delivery information visit our website at www;usps.com Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted DetveryFee (Endorsement Required) Total P Michael A. Mayer sent To Hildur Y. Troyer 41,-e7) 4341 County Road 117 °rP°B. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 City. Sfa Postmark JUL 2 e7010 USRc,_ SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY IN Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. a Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Michael A. Mayer Hildur Y. Troyer 4341 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 A. Si X ure ❑ Agent Addressee Date .f D: ery D. Is delivery addresa,differjnt-from Rem 1? ❑ es If YES, entei*every iidreo berow: 0 No 13 6,, 74 9 - O,;) L 3. Sery edified Min---CrExpress Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail 0 G.O.Q. 4. Restricted Delivery/? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transferfrom service label) 7009 2820 0001 8425 0550 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 ', U.S. Postal Service,„ CERTIFIED MAILT,. RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided). For delivery intormation visit our website at www.usps.comak u Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required} Bureau of Land Management 50629 Highway 6 & 24 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 •sSl'JiiBL,IIIRS4l SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. a Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Bureau of Land Management 50629 Highway 6 & 24 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Posy COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Si_ -tura ❑ Agent 0 Addressee B. R eived by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 175aYes if YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Se a Type Certified Mall 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (transfer from service label) 7 0 t1 9 2820 0 0 01 8425 0 5 4 3 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 73 nimfl c y. f C nit rt r7 rn I Lv. _to .- q as Ca 0 Z �.. cr, 0 Fri 0 11.111111 _ �' w az, h cC 0 ta ry ti O ZHIrl w O D< -I o N i=i C `. - 0 P"Z a 01110 % `TIDO) '` O Oil XI Z -,I C DC7 ID DEM I ZUM 0 OM O E F.6 m O a �lr R (fl o �' G` 14 m 1 o I 12) m til Ln ru 143 r-3 1= ru LO ru c� c P- r d U.S, Postal Service 1. CERTIFIED MAILz, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery 1ntprmatibit visit our_Vilebsrte at www.u$ps come Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required). Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Tc' . _ Ser. Dan. C. Wadsworth sri Margaret Wadsworth or n P. 0. Box 4173 Sunriver, OR 97702 m OTftbzfe MI1 1' 01111 SI 999LboZW617a fr ru u1 Irl ru r:13 rR G] RJ ru D— a N U S Postal Service:, CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (pgmestic Mall; Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) • For.delivery information visit our website at www.usp.s.cdmv Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Sent , C. E. Axthelm Co., a Parti Slreet, 4264 County Road 117 or Po Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 c,]y s SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: C. E. Axthelm Co., a Partnership 4264 County. Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signet X ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee C. Date of Delivery 7� r� D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Serv' Type Certified Mail ❑ Registered 0 Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7009 2820 0001 8425 0529 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt - 102595-02-M-1540 8425 0512 ri D Return Receipt Fee CI {Endorsement Required) U.S. PostalServicerr,, CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website atwww.usps.comn OFF S Postage Certified Fee Q 7009 2820 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Tot - Postmark xi 26'0; us? seat E. R. Axthelm Co., a Partnership step 4264 County Road 117 city Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: E. R. Axthelm Co., a Partnership 4264 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 A Signal X ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee B. R��ei by (Print d Na ) C. Date of Delivery g D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Se a Type Certified Mail 0 Registered 0 Insured Mali 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service !abet) 7009 2820 0001 8425 0512 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 U.S Postal Service Tri CEF TIFJED MAILThI RECEIPT {Dairtesfic Mali Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For, delivery information visit our, website at www;usps cams'-- " Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total —Postmark Here L� 26• `I Sent r White River Royalties, LLC P 5 .$ireet, 4194 S. Valentia Street °rp° Denver, CO 80237 City, S SENDER: COMPLETE TI -11S SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTIQD! ON DELIVERY NI Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: White River Royalties, LLC 4194 S. Valentia Street Denver, CO 80237 A. Signature X1 &gent 0 Addressee elved by (Printed Name) Cqate oflivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: QC -ho 3. S Type Certified Mali ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7009 2820 0001 8425 0505 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt /02595-02-M-1540 KARP NEU HANLON, P.C. 201 14th Street, Suite 200 P.O. Drawer 2030 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 RECEIVED AUG 1 0 2010 IREF491,AREMPT REQUESTED -- ,......., ';j 111FFF .h i 1 1 11 1 1 7009 2820 0001 8425 0499 NZXIE 00.2 DE 1 00 0E /09110 RETURN TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMBER UNABLE TO FORWAR0 BC:] 16t�.�'300.0 *1' 79-01510-27-:39 111i1)1I1111111i1111111111111111111111111111111111,111111)1111 7009 2820 0001 8425 Fg n 31 26461 0499 9 ea 3 0 tr 0 3. 049J82047665 Ct.! fC RA y %.1 %.1 - 07/27/2010 9 Mailed From 816011 US POSTAGE RJ r=0 u1 RJ ED r -R Gl O RJ Lt) ru rr 0 U.S. Postal SerVICeTM CERTIFIED MAIL,,, RECEIPT (Domestic. Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our. website at wWWusps•coms Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt.Fe (Endorsement Required) {Endorse ennd t tReq ired) Palnark Here . 1'', c0 CJ Tod Sen Sunlight View 11 HomeOwnerS sirE Association C iy p,0. Box 2659 CO 81601 Glenwood Springs , ... . SENDER: COMPLETE U -IIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Rem 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. e Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Sunlight View 11 Homeowners Association P.O. Box 2659 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 A. Signature X /Dd. ❑ Agent 0 Addressee B, Received by ( Printed Name) C. hate of Delivery Ar. leo r-rCY•6i •( 6 D. Is delyery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes if YS, enter delive address below: 0 No Ufa 6 Jil Q 1' 3. Sery Type Certified Mail ❑ Registered ❑ insured Mail ❑ Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) Cl Yes 2. Article Number {Transfer from service label) 7009 2820 0001 8425 0482 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 10259502-M-1540 u - U.S. Postal ServiceTr., CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (bomestic Mail Dryly; No insurance Coverage: Provided) For delivery /Orinfiationiisit our website at www.Usps.cartin 3FF1C AL US Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Pr Sent To Benjamin T. Lunt Street, Al Nicole G. Lunt orP°Bc 310 Meadow Wood Road City, Stat Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 PS Form �.r C. Postm ,rk Here • ctiohs� ru LI] r-1 U.S. Postal Service,,,, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail: Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) .For delivery information visit our website at-www.usps.eam® • F IAL, SE Postage Certified Fee t� Return Receipt Fee tJ (Endorsement Required) L'7 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) rL coTotal D'.."'^^a. ' @ ru Larry Kindall street Bernice M. Kindall r,-, or PO 1259 County Road 113 Carbondale, CO 81623 PSFo Poste ark Here . SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY a Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Larry Kindall Bernice M. Kindall 1259 County Road 113 Carbondale, CO 81623 -rB'Agent ❑ Addressee C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Sery Type C3 Certified Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Mail ❑ Express Mat ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service la 7009 2820 0001 8425 0468 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 8425 ©451 U.S. Postal Service,,, CERTIFIED MAILrm RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; NO Insurance Coverage Providers) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps:camp Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee C� (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required) ru 0 Total' ru Q' O r SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION $ A, Sent Tc Gregory B. Denney Street . Laura C. Denney "Pat 370 Meadow Wood Road coy, sc Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P$ Far ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. E l Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Gregory B. Denney Laura C. Denney 370 Meadow Wood Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY a. ReBeived by (Printed N l lJr�_ D. Is delivery address d)ff re1}ffrom item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery, dress below; ' ❑_ No gent ❑ Addressee C.;ate Qf Der ry 4.94 3. Se a Type Certified Mail © Registered ❑ Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service Label) 7009 2820 0001 8425 04511 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 S Postal Service. CERTIF1ED:=MAILrr, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery, information visit our website at.Www usps conto, Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Por" J oei U J aionCrl seer To Sarah N. Simonson Street, ap, Brent Simonson or PO boa 2585 Woodberry Drive \r Postmark Here,-� City Slate Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION - ■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Joel D. Halonen Sarah N. Simonson Brent Simonson 2585 Woodberry Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signal X i 7 ❑ Agent t " 2 ❑ Addressee B ecelved bbl ( Printed Name) C. Datq, of Delivery 7/-12-ep D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter deliveaddress below: ❑ No 3. Se a Type Certified Mail ❑ Registered CI Insured Mail 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2, Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7009 2820 0001 8425 0444 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 0 ru .S Postal Servicer CERTIFIED MAIL,, RECEIPT (Domestic 140 Only; No: Insurance: Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit aur )website at www.usps.comn Postage Certified Fee r1 O(Endorsement t Re eturn aired) I1 a ru do ru o— D Restricted Defwery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Po- f(eimeth O. Beckwith ° Kathy Beckwith Sfregw, 4456 Organ Mesa Loop or PO 80J Las Cruces, NM 88011 City, Sfate SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Kenneth O. Beckwith Kathy Beckwith 4456 Organ Mesa Loop Las Cruces, NM 88011 Postmark \ r Here COMPLETE MIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. X eceived by (Printed Name) 0 Agent 0 Addressee B • C. Date of Delivery 7-3l so D. Is delivery address different from item 17 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. SerCeret Type Certified Mail CI Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise D Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number 7009 2820 0001 8425 0420 (7Fansfer from service 1 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 m s1:1 rn to ru ri Q rU ru Er- r- 1 rrt U.S. Postal Servicen, CERTIFIED I1IAILTa.., RECEIPT. (Domestic Mail ;Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided): For`delivery informationvisit our website`at Www.usps;coms` .' Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 12, dr: 1F Total I Mark W Spidell' `j Sent To Elizabeth Flood Street 4339 County Road 117 sr PO Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 City. St • Post Here JUL 1010; 127/2010 USPS Classciairisagi ucttone SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Articre Addressed to: Mark W. Spid_, t Elizabeth Flood 4339 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A 5 ! ature ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee B. Receiv by (Printed C. Date } Delivery Via' I D. Is delivery add sass diffe from Item 1? 1t YES, enterde ryages$ below: • ❑ Yes ❑ No Certified MS ; ❑}cH___Wr=s Mall 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mali 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Fads Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service iabe° 7009 2823 0001 8425 0383 I PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 CI LT) ru Postage ra U.S Postai Service rrr CERTIFIED IVIAIE,Th, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)`;, For` delivery,Inforrnetlon:"visit Or'W bsite at;www.u`sps come Certified Fee rR Return Receipt Fee MI (Endorsement Required) C:I Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required} ru an Tote!r William L. Flood Sent Tc Nancy C. Flood rr o -street;' 4337 County Road 117 r` or O E Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • 'S 1 -'P SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION Postm Here 241'0 COMPLETE TMIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1, 2, and a Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address an the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the rriailpiece, or on the front if space permits. ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee 1. Article Addressed to: Will a�.�L. Flood Nancy C. Flood 4337 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 B. Re eiv by ('• fed ameL of Dell ery D. Is d - livery add ,, - i ifferent from' tem . ? If YES, enter;deliie address belo _) JUL 28 2d1®)Q ❑ Yes 0 No 3. Se ' e Type Certified Mail 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail in Express Mall ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise • ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (fransierfrom service 7009 2820 0001 8425 0390 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 U Postal Service ,CERTIFIED MAILi:. RECEIPT (Domestic Mall: only No insurance Coverage provided)'. For delivery information visit;our•websrte at'www•usps:comr,tl @ F Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Postmark Here jr To Angela Grace Dimercurio Simps." se„ Michael David Simpson Sire 751 Van Dorn Road °'I Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 eti SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. , 1. Article Addressed to: Angela Grace Dimercurio Simpson Michael David Simpson 751 Van Dorn Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Sg at X .(11ent ❑ ddressee B.Re'ceived b -.� kite 4 ed Name} C E Delivery 0. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 If YES enter delivery address below.... ,_0 .• 3. Se a Type IS Certified Mail 0 Express Mail >❑ Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7009 2820 0221 8425 0406 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 Il.l IU I S Postal:ServiceTn, CERTIFIED MAILT.. RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only Na Insurance Coverage Provided) `.. =Far delivery information visit our website at:www usps.com® s� f; Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) OO T John A. Groift Colleen B. Groth 4264 County Road 117 °r Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Se 053ft 06-- P stmark 6Postmark •(:.`i Here r (4.7/27-,421,9-":7: SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. II Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: John A. Groth Colleen B. Groth 4264 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ❑ Agent © Addressee B. eceived by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery D. is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yea If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No F 3. Se a Type Certified Mail ❑ Registered 0 Insured Mali 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service it 7009 2820 0001 8425 0413 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1544