Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application/�Gf/ /`�-OU�VTiQJ- �YG/NEED/NG SILT HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION PREPARED FOR: TERRI PATRICK P.O. BOX 561 RIFLE, CO 81650 (970) 625-2534 PREPARED BY: HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 JUNE 8, 2000 JOB NUMBER 2000023.01 923 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone 970 945-8676 •fax 970 945-2555 14 Inverness Drive East, Ste B-144 Englewood, CO 80112 phone 303 925-0544 • jax 303 925-0547 • • Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plat SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM SUBDIVISION NAME: Silt Heights Subdivision OWNER: Terri Patrick X ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR: High Country Engineering, Inc. LOCATION: Section 27, 28, 34 WATER SOURCE: Individual Wells Township 5S Range 92W SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: County Road 259 EXISTING ZONING: A / R / RD EASEMENTS: Utility N/A Ditch N/A TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residential Number Acres Single Famiy 4 36.44 Duplex Multi -family Mobile Home (2) Commercial Floor Area Acres sq.ft. (3) Industrial sq.ft. (4) Public/Quasi-Public (5) Open Space/Common Area TOTAL: PARKING SPACES: Residential N/A Commercial N/A Industrial N/A. • • WATER SUPPLY Water for this development will be supplied by individual wells on each lot. A well is already in use for the existing house on the northwest corner of the property. SEWAGE DISPOSAL Sewage disposal for this development will be per Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS). There is currently no existing sewer intercept line available to connect the proposed subdivision's sewer system. SCS MAPS AND TABLES See attached. IMPACT ON LAKES, STREAMS, AND TOPOGRAPHY The development will have minimal impact on drainages running through the property. Lots are laid out such that an adequate building envelope is available without impacting the existing drainages. The driveways will follow existing topography as much as acceptable engineering practices allow. Where drainage crossings are required, adequately sized culverts will be installed to convey the historical flows thru the property. There are no lakes within or around the property. RADIATION HAZARD See attached radiation hazard letter, provided by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc. ACCESS All lots on the development will have access to County Road 259. ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF SHALLOW UTILITIES Telephone — U.S. West, CR 259 (underground) Electric — Public Service, CR 259 (overhead) Gas — Public Service, CR 259 Cable TV — N/A • • SOILS CONSERVATION SERVICES MAP On—site Soil Types 41: Kim loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes (deep, well drained, mod. permeability, runoff slow) 56: Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes (deep, well drained, mod. permeability, runoff medium) atIVIRY. ,R.. HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 SCS TERRI PATRICK GARFIELD COUNTY SILT HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION SCS MAP 1"= 500' DES. CRB CK. JDH DR. ORD DATE 6/08/00 FILE NO. 2000023.01 SHEET 1 26 • Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moder- ate. This soil is used mainly for crops, hay, and pasture. Alfalfa, small grains, and grass or grass -legume mixtures are grown. This soil is irrigated by flooding or furrows. Sprinklers are also suitable. Drop structures in ditches control water and prevent excessive ditch erosion. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat - grasses, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves the range. Seeding im- proves range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for seeding. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Cottontail rabbit, ground squirrel, and pheasant find habitat on this soil. Use of this soil for community development and as a source of construction material is limited by low strength. This soil is in capability subclasses Ille, irrigated, and IVc, nonirrigated. '4ir41—Kim loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, moderately sloping to rolling soil is on allu- vial fans and benches. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,000 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from shale and sandstone. The average annual precipitation is about 12 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 48 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 125 days. Typically, the surface layer is yellowish brown or light yellowish brown loam about 17 inches thick. The under- lying material is light brownish gray loam to a depth of 60 inches. In places the underlying material is stratified with fine sandy loam. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Arvada and Potts soils that have slopes of 6 to 12 percent. These areas make up 5 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moder- ate. This soil is used mainly for crops, hay, and pasture. Alfalfa, small grains, and grass or grass -legume mixtures are grown. This soil is irrigated by flooding and furrows. Sprinklers are also suitable. Drop structures in irrigation ditches control water and prevent excessive ditch erosion. Keep- ing the soil in hay or pasture at least three-fourths of the tin0 helps to control erosion. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat- g`a,,s, needleandthread, and sagebrush. • SOIL SURVEY When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves the range. Seeding im- proves range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for seeding. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Cottontail rabbit, ground squirrel, and pheasant find habitat on this soil. Use of this soil for community development and as a source of construction material is limited by low strength and steep slopes. This soil is in capability subclasses IVe, irrigated, and Vle, nonirrigated. 42—Lamphier loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, steep soil is on fans and mountain- sides. Elevation ranges from 7,500 to 10,000 feet. This soil formed in residuum from sandstone and shale. The average annual precipitation is about 21 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 40 degrees F, and the frost -free period is less than 75 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown loam about 30 inches thick. The underlying material is reddish brown and dark reddish brown loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Almy soils and Rock outcrop. The Almy sons are at lower elevations. These areas make up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used mainly for grazing, wildlife habitat, and recreation. The native vegetation is aspen and an understory of bromes, elk sedge, wildrye, wheatgrass, peavine, colum- bine, snowberry, serviceberry, and chokecherry. When the understory vegetation deteriorates, forbs, shrubs, and Kentucky bluegrass increase. Properly man- aging grazing maintains and improves the understory vegetation. This soil is suited to production of quaking aspen. It can produce 4,050 cubic feet of wood per acre or 6,800 board feet of timber from a fully stocked, even -aged stand of 80 -year-old trees. At the present there is no commercial harvest of the aspen. Steep slopes affect harvesting, and special attention is needed to reduce soil loss during harvest. Mule deer, elk, blue grouse, and snowshoe rabbit find habitat on this soil. Septic tank filter fields, community development, and roads are limited by steep slopes. Surface runoff from snowmelt increases the erosion hazard on cuts and fills. Seeding reduces the erosion hazard. Roads can be de- 32 55—Potts loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, moderately sloping soil is on mesas, bench- es, and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 7,000 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt. The average annual precipi- tation is about 14 inches, the average annual air tem- perature is about 46 degrees F, and the average frost - free period is about 120 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is reddish brown clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum is pinkish white loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Olney, Kim, and Ildefonso soils that have slopes of 3 to 6 percent. These areas make up 10 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moder- ate. This soil is used mainly for irrigated crops and hay and for dryland farming (fig. 10). Alfalfa, small grains, and grass -legume hay are grown. Small areas are used for grazing. These soils are usually irrigated by flooding. Drop structures in irrigation ditches, grassed waterways, and minimum tillage prevent serious erosion. Irrigation water should be carefully managed to avoid piping and erosion. Cover crops or stubble mulching also help to limit ero- sion in dryfarmed areas. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat - grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves the range. Seeding im- proves range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for seeding. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Pheasant, mourning dove, cottontail rabbit, some mule deer, and squirrel find habitat on this soil. Community development and recreation are limited by low strength and the shrink -swell potential. Dwellings and roads can be designed to overcome these limita- tions. Community sewage systems will be needed if the population density increases. This soil is in capability subclasses Ille, irrigated, and IVe, nonirrigated. 'Iir56—Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, moderately sloping to rolling soil is on mesas, benches, and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 7,000 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average SOIL SURVEY annual air temperature is about 46 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 120 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is reddish brown clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum is pinkish white loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Kim, Olney, and Ildefonso soils that have slopes of 6 to 12 percent. These areas make up 10 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is severe. This soil is used mainly for grazing, wildlife habitat, and some dryland farming (fig. 10). Wheat, barley, and oats are grown. Minimum contour tillage and stubble mulching help to prevent excessive erosion. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat - grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing improves and maintains range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves range. Seeding improves range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for seed- ing. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Community development and recreation are limited by low strength, shrink -swell potential, and slope. Dwellings and roads can be designed to overcome these limita- tions. Community sewage systems will be needed if the population density increases. This soil is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. 57—Potts-Ildefonso complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes. These gently sloping to rolling soils are on mesas and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,500 feet. The Potts soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt. The Ildefonso soil formed in very strongly calcareous, basaltic alluvium and small amounts of eolian material. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 46 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 120 days. The Potts soil makes up about 60 percent of the map unit, and the Ildefonso soils makes up about 30 percent. The Potts soil is on slightly concave positions, and the Ildefonso soil is on the breaks of steeper slopes. The Potts soil is deep and well drained. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is reddish brown clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum is pinkish white loam that extends to a depth of 60 inches. JUN -12-2000 10:25 •EOTECH Gech June 9, 2000 Tar -i Dotrirk iicpworth•Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970.945.7988 Fax: 970-945.8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com P.02/04 P.O. Box 561 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Job No. 100 442 Subject: Gamma Radiation Survey, Proposed 4 Lot Subdivision, North of County Road 259, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Ms. Patrick: As requested, we have performed a radiation survey at the subject site. The findings and conclusions of our work are presented in this report. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for professional services to you, dated May 18, 2000. Proposed DeveIoptnent: We understand that a 4 lot residential subdivision is proposed on the property. The property covers about 36 acres. SingIe family residences will be constructed on each lot. The structures will likely be one and two story wood frame structures over crawlspaces or basement Ievels. Site Conditions: The area of the proposed development is located at the north end of County Road 259 in Garfield County, Colorado. An jrrigation ditch crosses through the property. The property is dominated by sagebrush with a few cottonwood trees along the ditch. The ground surface is gently rolling with slopes up to about 5%. Existing residences are located in the northwest corner and southern portions of the property. • Radiation Survey: A gamma radiation survey was conducted in the development area on May 30 and 31 and June 3, 2000. Gamma radiation measurements were taken on about 200 foot spacings using a Ludlum Model 3 survey meter and Ludlum Model 44-9 detector. The readings were taken about 21/2 feet above the ground surface. The survey points and readings are summarized on Fig. 1. The 56 readings ranged from 0.015 to 0.03 millirems per hour with an average of about 0.022 millirems per hour. Background readings at the south end of County Road 259 were 0.025 millirems per hour. JUN -12-2000 10:25 •EOTECH Terri Patrick June 9, 2000 Page 2 • P.03/04 Conclusions: The gamma radiation readings taken at the subject site appear to be ` r '_ background levels in the area. No mitigation of the radiation should be required. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., Rev. by: SL? JZA/ksm attachment cc: High Country Engineering - Attn: Dan Dennison H -P GEOTECH JUN -12-2000 10:26 •EOTECH • P.04/04 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 250' DITCH LEGEND PROPERTY EOUNOAR •.025 RADIATION M£ASUREME MILUREMS PER HOUR .100 .02 x.03 25 .025 w.03 .025 02 .02 .025 .02 .02 .02 .02 `.02 x.015 '.02 '.02 015 '.02 .025 '.025 i 1 1 .03 .015 .02 O1b '.02 VT .02 .02 .02 • • .02 EXISTING MODULAR HOME v.015 • • .02 .025 .015 .025 .02 `.02 '.025 .-----, 02 • • 1.02 . .02 .025 .03 �.Q2 .1 .03 ,...--•......_...._ - .02 025 02 02 025 02 02 15 25 .03 .025 COUNTY ROAD 259 100 442 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL., INC. RADIATION SURVEY POINTS Fig. 1 TOTAL P.04 • • June 19,2000 I Terri Patrick agree to allow High Country Engineering to submit an application on my behalf for Silt Heights Subdivision Terri Patrick 1175 CR259 Rifle, Co. 81650 970-625-2534 t)-.0SW c( From: Davis Farrar 970-963-7172 To: Kitt Lyon Date: 7/26/00 Time: 4:02:40 PM Page 1 of 1 • SILT PLANNING STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: KITT LYON FROM: DAVIS FARRAR - SILT PLANNER SUBJECT: SILT HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION DATE: 7:26/00 CC: CRAIG OLSON, SILT PLANNING COMMISSION The proposed Silt Heights Subdivision Sketch Plan lies outside the Silt municipal boundary by approximately 3.14 miles. It also lies outside of the Silt urban growth boundary. Because of these characteristics, the Town of Silt has no jurisdictional review of this project. The Silt staff has no comments on this project at this time. The town appreciates the referral of this application and the opportunity to review the plan. If you have any questions, or request that the town provide specific input on this application even though it lies out of our jurisdictional arena, please contact me. • RECEIVED JUL 2 4 2080 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303) 866-3581 FAX: (303) 866-3589 http://water.state.co.us/default.htm Kit Lyon Garfield County Building and Planning 109 8th St Ste 303 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 July 12, 2000 Re- Silt Heights Subdivision Sketch Plan Sections 27, 28 & 34, T5S, R92W, 6TH PM W. Division 5, W. District 39 Bill Owens Governor Greg E. Walcher Executive Director Hal D. Simpson, P.E. State Engineer Dear Mr. Lyon: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a parcel of 36.44 acres into four single family lots. The applicant proposes to provide water through individual wells on each lot, and states that a well is already in use for an existing house on the property, but no well permit information was provided. Sewage disposal is to be through individual disposal systems. No information was provided concerning the physical adequacy of the water supply. As outlined in the statutes, Section 30-28-133(3)(d), C.R.S., the subdivider is required to submit adequate evidence that a water supply that is sufficient in terms of quality, quantity, and dependability will be available to ensure an adequate supply of water. Adequate evidence is usually provided in the form of a water resource report, prepared by a professional engineer, which addresses the quality, quantity, and dependability issues. A report of this nature was not provided. See the attached Guidelines for Subdivision Water Supply Plan Reports for the necessary information. The source of the proposed water supply would be from, or tributary, to the Colorado River. The Colorado River is overappropriated, therefore an augmentation plan is required to offset depletions caused by the use of water for this development. Due to the lack of a water court approved augmentation plan, the State Engineer finds pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(I), C.R.S., that the proposed water supply mil cause material injury to decreed water rights and is inadequate. If you or the applicant has any questions concerning this matter, please contact Craig Lis of this office for assistance. Sincerely, enneth W. Knox Assistant State Engineer KWK/CML/Silt Heights.doc cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer Joe Berquist, Water Commissioner, District 38 • • GUIDELINES FOR SUBDIVISION WATER SUPPLY REPORTS A Water Supply Report is required for all subdivision proposals. Colorado Revised Statutes, (C.R.S.), 30-28-133(3)(d) describes the basic requirements for water supply reports, while C.R.S. 30-28-136 describes the review process. The statutes may be viewed at the Colorado Statute Manager web site, http://www.intellinetusa.com/statmgr.htm. This office reviews water supply report for subdivisions only upon referral from the County as required by C.R.S. 30-28-136(h). Note that well permits cannot be issued in areas that are over -appropriated until this office has approved the water supply report and the County has approved the subdivision. Additionally, this office does not provide engineering consultation and legal advice. For this information, please seek private legal counsel and/or an engineering consultant. PART iapplies to proposals to obtain water from individual on -lot wells, central wells, or other water source that is not from a municipality or quasi -municipality. PART 11 applies to proposals to obtain water from a municipality or quasi -municipality. PART 111 applies to proposals to obtain water for land divisions that are to be exempted from County subdivision regulations. PART 1 For those proposals that will obtain water from individual on -lot wells, central wells, or other water source that is not from a municipality or quasi -municipality, the proposal will be evaluated pursuant to C.R.S. 30-28-136(1)(h)(I). Under C.R.S. 1973, 30-28-136(1)(h)(I), Counties are required to submit to the State Engineer all subdivision preliminary plans. The State Engineer is then required to respond to the Board of County Commissioners in writing, with an opinion concerning the potential injury to decreed water rights caused by diversions to supply the subdivision and the adequacy of the proposed water supply. In addition to the requirements specifically listed in statute, the report should address the following: a. The expected water requirements (total demand and consumptive use) of the subdivision at full development for all anticipated water use (residential, lawn irrigation, animal watering, commercial and industrial, etc.). Typically, the analysis of water requirements and the associated consumptive use are presented in gallons per day or acre-feet per year. b. The source of water for the proposed subdivision, and the legal and physical availability and dependability of the source. c. Evidence of ownership or right of use of existing water rights. d. An evaluation of the potential for material injury to all existing and proposed water rights as a result of water use in the subdivision including the cumulative effect of on -lot wells. • • e. A completed Water Supply Information Summary Form listing the proposed uses. f. A 1"= 24,000' (7.5 minute) scaled U.S.G.S. topographic map with the boundaries of the proposed subdivision plotted as described by the metes and bounds description. Water Supply from Tributary Ground Water In over -appropriated stream systems, where the water source for the proposed subdivision is considered tributary, the withdrawal of ground water will cause material injury to other water rights. A court approved plan for augmentation is required to offset the depletions caused by the pumping of the tributary ground water and must be obtained prior to this office granting approval of the proposed water supply. Ground water in most areas outside the Denver Basin would be considered tributary. In areas where water is available for appropriation, a plan for augmentation will generally not be required. However, there are only a few areas on the Western Slope that are not over -appropriated. The Division Engineer should be contacted for this information. Water Supply from Denver Basin Aquifers The Denver Basin contains the Dawson (upper and lower in some areas), Denver, Arapahoe (upper and lower in some areas), and the Laramie -Fox Hills aquifers. Please review Denver Basin Aquifer map to determine if your parcel is within the Denver Basin. Depending on the location within the basin, the ground water can be nontributary or not-nontributary. The Denver Basin Rules and Regulations and the State Wide Nontributary Ground Water Rules should be consulted to determine whether an aquifer may be considered nontributary or not-nontributary. In either case, the amount of water available beneath the subject property must be determined pursuant to Section 37-90-137(4), C.R.S. Information is available from this office that can be used in making this determination. Note, any existing wells on or in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision must be considered in this analysis since they may reduce the amount of water available by virtue of their prior appropriation. This office would need to evaluate each situation on a case by case basis. If the proposed water source is not-nontributary, C.R.S. 37-90-137(9)(c) requires judicial approval for plans for augmentation prior to the use of not-nontributary ground water. The ground water in the Denver Basin aquifers is evaluated under 100 year aquifer life criteria pursuant to the Denver Basin Rules, 2 CCR 402-6, and the Statewide Nontributary Ground Water Rules, 2 CCR 402-7. These Rules may be obtained for a fee from our Records Section at (303) 866-3447. Elbert, Adams, and El Paso Counties generally require • • new subdivisions to have a 300 year water supply. You should contact your particular county for specific requirements. For subdivision proposals located in a Designated Basin, the Ground Water Management District should be consulted. PART 11 In the event that a municipality or quasi -municipality (e.g. water district) is to supply water to the subdivision, C.R.S. 30-28-136(h)(II) sets forth special procedures for proof of availability of water. The municipality or water district must file with the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and the State Engineer a report on the amount of water that can be supplied to the subdivision without causing injury to existing water rights. This office, in turn, must provide the Board with written comments concerning the water supply report. If the water supply report is inadequate, this office must notify the Board and indicate the deficiencies of the report. In addition the requirements specifically listed in statute, the report should address the following: a. A summary of water rights owned or controlled by the municipality or district. b. The firm yield of these rights. c. The present demand on the system and the anticipated demand due to commitments for service entered into by the municipality or district. d. The amount of uncommitted firm supplies the municipality or district has available for future development. e. A completed Water Supply Information Summary Form listing the proposed uses. f. A 1"= 24,000' (7.5 minute) scaled U.S.G.S. topographic map with the boundaries of the proposed subdivision plotted as described by the metes and bounds description. g. A letter of commitment from the municipality or district must be submitted with the subdivision proposal. The letter should include evidence that the municipality or district proposed as the water supplier can and will supply water to the proposed subdivision by stating the amount of water available for use by the proposed subdivision and the feasibility of extending service to the new area. This office maintains files on most municipalities and water districts, and when a particular file is incomplete, this office will request additional information before completing a review. The information on an existing municipality or a water district identified as a source of water for a subdivision must include an evaluation of the legal and physical availability of the water supply. PART III Counties may exempt certain proposals from their full submittal requirements. Since these "County exemptions" are not considered subdivisions, this office does not generally provide review comments. The fact that a property is exempt from subdivision regulations does not alter the duty of the State Engineer to protect senior vested water rights. A thorough review of the permit application must be conducted in accordance with C.R.S. 37-92-602(3)(b) to • • determine the effect of the proposed well upon other vested water rights, including existing wells. Subsection 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) says "there shall be a presumption that there will not be material injury to the vested water rights of others or to any other existing well resulting from such well, which presumption may be rebutted by evidence sufficient to show such material injury". Well permits for the resulting lots of a property split by exemption cannot be obtained prior to the County approval. The County Commissioners must grant the exemption before the applications for new well permits are submitted to this office. Furthermore, if the County grants an exemption and there is an existing well permit for the property, this office may not be able to issue additional well permits. For example, if the original permit was issued as the only well on the tract and then the tract is divided and exempted, then that permit needs to be canceled or amended prior to obtaining well permits on the new lots. Many of the referenced rules herein can be obtained from the Records. Section of this Office at (303) 866-3447. Please see publications to determine the cost involved. Home Organization Groundwater Surface Water Dams Records Phones iNOER SUPPLY INFORMATION SU.RY Section 30-28-133,(d), C.R.S. requires that the applicant submit to the County,"Adequate evidence that a water supply that is sufficient in terms of quantity, quality and dependability will be available to ensure an adequate supply of water. 1. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT AS PROPOSED 2. LAND USE ACTION 3. NAME OF EXISTING PARCEL AS RECORDED SUBDIVISION FILING BLOCK LOT 4. TOTAL ACREAGE 5. NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED PLAT MAP ENCLOSED • YES 6. PARCEL HISTORY - Please attach copies of deeds, plats or other evidence or documentation. A. Was parcel recorded with county prior to Juna 1, 1972? ❑ YES ❑ NO B. Has the parcel ever been part of a division of land action since June 1, 1972? ❑ YES 0 NO If yes, describe the previous action 7. LOCATION OF PARCEL - Include a map deliniatinp the project area and tie to a section corner. 114 OF 1/4 SECTION TOWNSHIP • N 0 S RANGE 0 E 0 W PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN: ■ 6TH • KM. • UTE 0 COSTILLA 8. PLAT - Location of all wells on property must be plotted and permit numbers provided. Surveyors plat 0 Yes • No If not, scaled hand drawn sketch 0 Yes 0 No 9. ESTIMATED WATER REQUIREMENTS - Gallons per Day a Acre hat par Year HOUSEHOLD USE # of units GPD AF 10. WATER SUPPLY SOURCE ❑ EXISTING • DEVELOPED WELLS SPRING WELL PERMIT NUMBERS 0 NEW WELLS - PROPOSED AOUFERS . (CHECK ONE/ ❑ AWAM. ❑ UPPER ARAPAHOE ❑ UPPER OAWSJ ❑ LOWER ARAPAHOE 0 LOWER DAWSON 0 LARAMIE FOX HILLS COMMERCIAL USE # of S.F. GPD AF ❑ DENVER ❑ DAKOTA IRRIGATION # of acres GPD AF 0 OTHER 0 MUNICIPAL STOCK WATERING # of head GPD AF OTHER - GPD AF • ASSOCIATION 0 COMPANY WATER COURT DECREE CASE NO.'S TOTAL GPO AF ❑ DISTRICT NAME LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR SERVICE ■ YES 0 NO 11. ENGINEER'S WATER SUPPLY REPORT • YES 0 NO IF YES, PLEASE FORWARD WITH THIS FORM. (This may be required before our review is completed.) 12. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 0 SEPTIC TANKILEACH FIELD 0 CENTRAL SYSTEM - DISTRICT NAME ❑ LAGOON 0 VAULT - LOCATION SEWAGE HAULED TO 0 ENGINEERED SYSTEM (Attach i copy of engineering design) 0 OTHER gaifie(i County Public 3feaCtk Nyrsing Service Wif[e Office 902 9augfrenbaugk, Suite 104 Rifle, Colorado 81650 (970) 625-5200 DATE: July 25, 2000 MEMO TO: Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 FROM: Mary Meisner Garfield County Public Health Nursing 902 Taughenbaugh Blvd. Suite 104 Rifle, Co 81650 REGARDS: Silt Heights Subdivision Project Review GlenwoodSprings Office 109 8th St.,Room 202 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-6614 After careful review of the subdivision application by Terri Patrick of the 36.40 acre tract of land into 4 single family lots. I have only one concern regarding the subdivision request. • The need for well water analysis on each of the four family lots. Several wells analysis in the drainage basin south of Harvey Gap, east of Rifle, west of Silt and north of the Colorado River on individual or shared wells other than city water were found to have high nitrate levels. The nitrate levels exceed health protective concentrations in ground water. Excessive nitrate levels were found at several individual wells as apart of owner well maintenance. MEMORANDUM To: Kit Lyon From: Steve Anthony Re: Comments on the Silt Heights Subdivision Date: July 26, 2000 Kit, Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the Silt Heights Subdivision. My comments are as follows: 1. Request the applicant to conduct a noxious weed survey for the weeds listed on Garfield County's Noxious Weed List (enclosed). 2. Ask them to submit a written Weed Management Plan provide for the management of any listed weeds located on the property. Irrigation ditches are common sources of weed infestations. Their Weed Management Plan should address weed management along all irrigation ditches. REllilVED JUL 3 1 2000 Garfield County Road & Bridge Memo To: Kit Lyon From: Kraig Kuberry Date: 7/26/00 Re: Silt Heights Subdivision Sketch Plan I have reviewed the sketch plan for Silt Heights Subdivision. The results are as follows: • Need to know where the access road is going to be located. Would like to see one entrance off of the county road. Would like to see the access road be brought up to county standards. • All fences need to be removed or set back to R.O.W line. At this time, plans look good. I will review the access at a later date. • Page 1 JUL-06-2000 THU 12:42 PI"[ GARFIELD SCHOOL DIST RE2 FAX NO. 9706257623 P. 01 • • GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department Review Agency Form Date Sent: Comments Due: /2-4' lav Name of application: Silt Heights Subdivision Sketch Plan Sent to: RE -2 School District Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the staff contact in the event you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be used for your convenience, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments may be mailed or faxed to: Garfield County Building & Planning Staff contact: Kit Lyon 109 8`h Street, Suite 301 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax: 970-384-5004 Phone: 970-945-8212 E-mail: "garcopin@rof.net" General comments: This review agency recommends (circle one): Approval / Denial The following; are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial: t� Name ofreyiew agency: r .!-''• •'. �, ��... _ !:. r = '14::.1 14: By: ,,:=,_... Date: Revised 3/30/00 07/05/00 20:24 FAX 970 625 0859 • Garfield Cty HA 1101 • GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department Review Agency Form Name of application: Silt_Heights S _ ._ Sent to:_ c ~ Garfield County Housing Authority Date Sent: (0%1 oD Comments Due: 7l?__0.1 _ Ian Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the staff contact in the event you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be used for your convenience, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments may be mailed or faxed to: Garfield Co Staff co 109 8Str Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax: 970-384-5004 Phone: 970-945-8212 E-mail: "garcopin(rof.net" : Kit Lyon General cornmPnts: This review agency recommends (circle one): Approval / Denial The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial: Date: Revised 3/39/00 • • STATE OF COLORADO Bill Owens, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER John W. Mumma, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 July 14, 2000 Kit Lyon Garfield County Building & Planning 109 8th Street, Suite 301 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Kit: For Wildlife - For People I have reviewed the sketch plan for the Silt Heights Subdivision between Silt and Rifle. Because the information provided by the applicant is minimal at best and the fact that wildlife impacts are not addressed at all in the sketch plan, I am unable to make comments for the Division of Wildlife until a more concise plan is provided. This Subdivision would be located in deer winter range and there will be impacts on this species as well as many others. For this reason I recommend that the Silt Heights Subdivision sketch plan be denied until such time that the applicant addresses wildlife issues. I also recommend that the applicant hire a competent wildlife consultant to examine and address such items as fence specifications, dogs, covenants, winter range, possible wetlands, and game damage. We look forward to reviewing the preliminary plan. Respectfully, Don Crane District Wildlife Manager cc: Yamashita files DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Greg Walcher, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Bemard L. Black, Jr., Chairman • Rick Enstrom, Vice -Chairman • Philip James, Secretary WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 14th day of July, 1997, between KENNETH L. ELDER and JANEY RUTH ELDER aka J. RUTH ELDER aka RUTH ELDER, of the County of Darfield and State of Colorado, Grantors, and MMES R. HUBBARD and TERRI PATRICK. Tenants in Common, whose legal address is P. 0. Box 561, Rifle, of the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, Grantees: WITNESSETH, That the Grantors for and 'in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars (S1t 00) had other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is by acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do gnat, bargain, sell, convey assignsforer all the and confirm, unto the Grantees, their heirs, seccesors and being in the Coup of Garfietogether with improvements, if any, situate, lying and h ld, State of Colorado described as follows: That real property described on Mbit A attached hereto, subject to a Mi I permanent, non-exclusive aeras and utility easement described as set forth on Exhibit B, which acres" and utility easement is for the benefit of the V a properties e� odescribede os Exhibit A, as well as Exhibit C, D and E attached �r attached hereto are incorporated herein by reference. NI; subject to easements in location to be determined as necessary and I= sufficient for the construction, operation and maintenance of pumps and . i buried pipelines from the Farmers Irrigation Ditch to the parcels described = as Exhibits D and E attached to this deed. El=R By accepting delivery of the within deed, Grantees covenant and agree not to o place, at any time, a gate or other obstruction across the easement described tI W = on Exhibit B attached to this deed, unless Grantees have obtained, the permission of W in writing. �_ � property owners who have a lawful right to use said easement. This covenant shall run with the land, shall be perpetual, and shall be binding upon Grantees' co-owners and successors. 'lice covenant shall not 11!; prevent construction of a cattle guard on said easement. TOGETHER with any wells, weq water and water rights used in, on or in connection with said property, including five (5) shares of Farmers Irrigation Ditch s easements and ditches in place and in use sufficient to divert,and' use uid with on the property described is Exhibit A. transport and use said water TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reve remainders, rents. issues and profits thereof, and ati the estate right,rshona, remainder c and and demand whatsoever of the Grantor,, either in law or equity, oin title,n interest, claim bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. °� in and to the above- p �� pphrrtenances. 4 . +utr a Ge. ro4t p.C. 9.0. 1 , C'o Fs1lc so TO RAVE AND TO HOLD the aid premises above -bargained sad described, with the appunye% unto tie tkaateee, their rein, successors and assigns brevet. And the Orman, fur thaawlven, their heirs, srooenon and :aims, do covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Orzatees, their heirs, successors or assigns, that at the time of the emerging and delivery of these presents, are well seised of the premises above conveyed, have good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, is fee simple, and have good tight, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same is manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except subject to the 1997 general property taxes, patent reservations, prior mineral reservations, restrictions, easements of record and in place and in use, mineral reservations and leases thereof! The Granton shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND tbe above. bad premises is the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantees, their heirs, ages, against all and every person or persons !awfully daiming tbe whole or any part thereof. The singular number include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor bas executed this deed on the date set forth r .jutbHra Kenneth L der� STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFTELD )a ) The by JANET RUT'H�EIDE aka a J RZTIH ELDisstrunient was ER aka RUTH ELDER andre me this 16th day KENNETH July, 1997, L ELDER. Witness ary bead and official seal. My Commission Expires: ca -ill 4taly"Pu4S 01.31,1VIVILRAVEN se 1111111.1M 19.119 LIS 41111WIIK9 CUM EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NE% NE% AND WE SE% NE% OF SECTION 28, THE NW% SW1 AND 'THE SW% SW% OF SECTION 27 AND THE NW% NW%4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS 'FOLLOWS: (ALL BEARINGS IN THIS DESCRIPTION A RE RELATIVE TO THE WEST UNE OF THE SW% OF SAID SECTION 27 AS BEARING N. 00.12'00" W.) BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, SAID SOLS CORNER BEING A BRASS CAP AND STANDARD MONUMENT P.L.S. #10732; THEN S. 00205'33" E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW% NWV. OF SAID SECTION 34 A DISTANCE OF 69.92 FEET; THEN DEPARTING SAID WEST UNE 11939 FEET ALONG} THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 66.79 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 102'35'11" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS N. 51'4'22" E. 104.24 FEET; THEN S. 77'37'58" E. 20.94 FEET; THEN 107.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07241'54" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS S. 81928'55" E. 107.41 FEET; THEN S. 85*19'52" E. 150.72 FEET; THEN N. 02'44'07" E. 906.33 FEET; THEN N. 02'08'39" E 906.62 FEET; THEN N. 84920'59" W. 443.78 FEET; THEN S. 81*10'08" W. 582.74 FEET; THEN S. 01'06'08" E. 443.92 FEET; THEN S. 06*15'25" E. 760.77 FEET; THEN 35.11 FEET ALONG THE ARC SOF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 160.00 FEET, A CENTRAL 'ANGLg OF 12934'23' AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS S. 12'32'39" E. 35.04 FEET; 11' THEN S. 18'49'52" E. 203.24 FEET; THEN 94.65 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13'33'28" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS S. 25936'37" E. 94.43 FEET; THEN S. 61'22'12" E. 236.68 FEET; THEN S. 64202'26" E. 187.83 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SE'/. NE', THEN ALONG SAID EAST UNE S. 00912'00" EAST 21.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 36.44 ACRES AS DESCRIBED. •,110!!!!.. i!1■ 3of7RM•.M•31.69NCUM t4 UMW AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTT..TflES, MID EASEMENT BEING THIRTY FEET moor) m WIDTH, SAID EASEMENT ENCOMPASSING THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED ARE ► BEING SITUATED IN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6Th P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID EASEMENT BEING MORE PARTICULAItL.y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (ALL BEARINGS IN THIS DESCRIPTION ARE RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SWK OF SAID SECTION 27 AS BEARING N. 00'12'00" W.) BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH THE WEST Y4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 BEARS N. 25175'02' W. 960.08 FEET, SAID WEST 1 CORNER BEING A BLM STANDARD MONUMENT; THEN S. 02'08'39" W. 908.31 FEET; THEN S. 02'44'07" W. 905.16 FEET; THEN S. 85919'53" E. 30.02 FEET; THEN N. 0244'07" E. 906.33 FEET; THEN N. 021108'39" E. 906.62 FEET; THEN N. 84'20'59" W. *05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EIVIIII 4et7tse.At».AIIOASemu KM EXHIBIT C A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN rim NW% SW1 AND THE SWV4 SW'/• OP SECTION 27 AND IN THE NW% NWv OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6111 P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (ALL BEARINGS IN THIS DESCRIPTION ARE RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SW1 OF SAID SECTION 27 AS BEARING N. 00'12'00" W.) BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH THE WEST y CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 BEARS S. 84'20'59" W. 443.78 FEET AND N. 00'12'00" W. 825.23 FEET; THEN S. 02208'39" W. 906.62 FEET; THEN S. 02'44'07" W. 906.33 FEET; THEN 100.13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09233'41" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS N. 89253'18' E 100.01 FEET; THEN N. 8906'28" E. 50.78 FEET; THEN S. 86233'12" E. 48.76 FEET; THEN S. 84'38'31' E. 90.46 FEET; THEN 124.16 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO 713E LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 161.89 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43256'39" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS N. 73223'09" E. 121.14 FEET; THEN N. 51224'50" E. 131.89 FEET; THEN 276.29 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1109.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14216'2" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS N. 58233'04" E. 275.57 FEET; THEN N. 6541'17" 1s. 255.46 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SW1/4 SW+ THFN N. 00213'24" W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE 875.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW1 SW1; THEN N. 00'15'24" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW'h SWY/ 488.85 FEET; THFN DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE N. 84220'59" W. 898.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF J—GINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 35.0? ACI..ES AS DESCRIBED. III 11111111111 911000 07/17/1097 MINN NM 412 sof 7 136.09 0 10.911 M 9.611 1111,10L0 CLINK UMW D 11 TRACT OR LAND SITUATED IN THE NW% SW% AND THE SW%, NW% OP $8CflON T, Tomato? S SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST C' THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID TRAC,' OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (ALL BEARINGS IN THIS DESCRIPTION ARE RELATIVE TO THE WEST UNE OF THE SW% OF SAID SECTION 27 AS BEARING N. 00912'00" W. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW%4 NW%, SAID NOI.TNEA.ST CORNER BEING A Al REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAP, PLS. 027413; THEN N. 84907'32" W. ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SA /3 SW% NW% 707.33 FEET; THEN DEPARTING SAID NORTH UNE S. 00'00'00" E. 1306.98 FEET: THEN S. 12'38'49" W. 627.09 FEET; THEN S. 84'20'59" E. 828.29 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW% SWI; THEN N. 00113'24" W. ALONG SAID LAST LINE 825.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NW% SW%; 'THEN N. 00'1551" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SW% NW% 1304.81 FEET TO THE row OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 36.36 ACMES AS DESCRIBED. •611.1.100 Sal 11ILO MMil II INIM OMR EXHIBIT E A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE E' NE% NE% OF SECTION 28, THE NW% NW% AND THE SW%4 NW% AND THE NW'/. SW% OF SECTION 27, THE VA SE% SEV OF SECTION 21 AND THE SW% SW% OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6Th P.M.., COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID TRACT OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (ALL BEARINGS IN THIS DESCRIPTION ARE RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SW% OF SAID SECTION 27 AS BEARING N. 00'12'00" W.) BEGINNING AT THE WEST Y CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, SAID WEST 1/4 CORNER BEING A BLM STANDARD MONUMENT; THEN S. 00212'00" E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW'/. SW1 825.23 FEET; THEN DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE S. 84'20'59" E. 443.78 FEET; THEN N. 12438'49" E. 827.09 FEET; THEN N. 00200'00" W. 1306.98 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SW+/4 NW+/s; THEN S. 8440T32" E. ALONG SAID NORTH UNE 707.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW'/. NW'/ THEN N. 00215'31" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW'/4 NWS/. 1304.5d FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NWS/. NW'/.; THEN N. 00414'34" W. ALONG IHE EAST LINE OF SAID SW+/. SW1 1313.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SW1 SW1/4; THEN N. 83'3T05" W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SW% SW' 1349.25 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID E%4 SE% SES/.; THEN S. 87214'14" W. ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID E'/, SE% SE% 656.82 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EK SE% SEY; THEN S. 00423'28" E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID E' SES SE'/4 1292.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID Elh SE'/% SES; THEN S. 00413'11" E. ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID EV NE% NE'/4 1340.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID E' NE'/. NE'/.; THEN ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EL NE'/• NE/ N. 87406'22" E. 660.42 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID E' NE'/. NE* THEN S. 00'15'12" E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SW'/4 NW'/. 1310.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 149.24 ACRES, AS DESCRIBED. 1111111111111111111111111111111111 611R0O 7/17/18117 MAW BIM 10344 432 7 of 7 R 34.40 D 111.N M •.N Mw'IOJ1 CLINK ijakAl► 1,00, GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department Review Agency Form RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2000 Date Sent: Comments Due: Name of application: Silt Heights Subdivision Sketch Plan Sent to: Bookcliff Soil Conservation District Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the staff contact in the event you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be used for your convenience, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments may be mailed or faxed to: Garfield County Building & Planning Staff contact: Kit Lyon 109 8th Street, Suite 301 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax: 970-384-5004 Phone: 970-945-8212 E-mail: "garcopin(rof net" Ge.eral co uuents: V'..� f*. " lb/ i 1 a 1' u r r /a. yam, ' . _•-rrm S lit This review agency recommends (circle o: Appro / Denial The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial: a0/TO 39Vd A1Nf100 Q13T4dV9 t1aSf1 Date: nD Revised 3/30/00 L£80St60L6 CS :ST 000Z/60/80 THOMAS P. DALESSANDRI Sheriff of Garfield County Date: August 3, 2000 To: Garfield County Building and Planning From: James H. Sears, Undersheriff Re: Silt Heights Subdivision Sketch Plan. GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. P.O. Box 249 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (970)945-0453 Fax (970)945-7651 RECEIVED ,AUG o 3 SO The Sheriffs Office has received the above referenced Sketch plan. There is not enough information presented (location and dimensions of access roads, locations of dwellings, access onto county roads, etc.) to make comments at this time.