HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationGARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470
www.garfield-countv.com
Subdivision Application Form
GENERAL INFORMATION
(To be completed by the applicant.)
Overview
• Subdivision Name:
y Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types):
Sketch Plan X Preliminary Plan Final Plat
Name of Property Owner (Applicant):_kLayy„ Q
➢ Address: 132 Park Ave.
Y City: Basalt
State: co
c6t0
927-9119
Telephone:
Zip Code: 81601 FAX: 9 2 7- 4 0 2 7
v Name of Owner's Repres4ntative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc):
Steve Oger, Rick Oger, Gary Setnes
srac
37.1-001
c/o Rudd Construction132 ParkAve. 927-9119
• Adc� ss: Telephone:
• City: Basalt
State: co Zip Code: 81601 FAX: 927-4027
i' Name of Engineer: Sopris Engineer ing,LLC
v Address: 502 Main - A3 Telephone: 704-0311
City: Carbondale,
State: co
Name of Surveyor: Sexton Survey
Address: 128 W. 3rd.
➢ City: Rifle
Zip Code: 8 1 6 2 3 FAX: 7 0 4- 0 3 13
Telephone: _62 s _11.11
State: C 0 Zip Code: 8 1 6 5 0 FAX: 6 2 5- 3 1 6 0
➢ Name of Planner:
➢ Address: Telephone:
➢ City: State: Zip Code:
JUI vJi004
BUILUiiv(, 0,
GENERAL INFORMATION continued...
➢ Location of Property: Section 35 Township 6S Range 88W
➢ Practical Location / Address of Property: 8 5 7 5 CR 115
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
➢ Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres): 48.520
➢ Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision: 4
➢ Property Current Land Use Designation:
1. Property's Current Zone District:
2. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation:
Proposed Utility Service:
➢ Proposed Water Source:
Well, Permit x/2570297
➢ Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: ISDS
➢ Proposed Public Access VIA: CR 1 1 5, DrJ Le _Fermi t 3�
➢ Easements:
Utility: Kinder Moraan_, Holy Cross, Qwest
Ditch: Thad Neislanik Ditch
➢ Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below):
{1) Residential
Units I Lots
Size (Acres)
Parlung 'Provided
Single Family
3
11.352
12+
Duplex
Multi -Family,
Mobile Home
Total
3
11.352
12+
Floor Area (sci.
Size (Acres)
Parkinq`Provided
(2) Commercial
(3) Industrial
(4) Public 1 Quasi -Public
(5) Open Space f>Common Area
37.168
Total
37.168
➢ Base Fee: Sketch Plan - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200 paid on
➢ Plat Review Fee (see attached fee schedule)
2
• •
I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS
In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use
processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and
3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide
general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision
approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for
purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following
address: http://www.garfield-county.com/building and planning/index.htm
A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to
propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield
County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with
the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any
issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued.
2. Applicability
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process.
More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the
division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or
separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or
other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing
Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the
Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the
resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments.
Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the
specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to
satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this
application form.
4. Process / Public Meeting
The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1 -step process because the
application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order
to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all
required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning
Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the
application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as
required.
If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
3
• •
scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the
applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review.
If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the
applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the
Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically
complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,
the application will be terminated.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will
conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory
documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the
Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments
provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.
As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning
Commission containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will
also be furnished in advance to the applicant.
At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff
will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to
present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by
the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning
Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will
be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1 -year from the meeting date before the
Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to
the Planning Department within the 1 -year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be
closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a
Preliminary Plan review.
B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of
the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the
purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most
intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission,
and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all
the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory
requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues
in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision
Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as well as other state and local referral
agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the
process that will either approve or deny the application request.
4
• •
2. Applicability
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield
County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision
as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more Tots, tracts, parcels or
separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or
other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already
completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3:00 of the
Subdivision Regulations.
An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this
application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to
4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and
Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations.
In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision
project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so
that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC
which is addressed in Sections 4:20 — 4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations.
4. Process / Public Hearings
The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2 -step process because the
application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-making entities during public
hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC.
In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and
the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal
requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted,
Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required
submittal information has been submitted as required.
If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff
will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted.
If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
5
• •
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the
applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the
Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically
complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time,
the application will be terminated.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application,
Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use
regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and
the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments
provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application.
As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning
Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This
Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant prior to the public
hearings.
As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and
the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The
Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is
responsible for making a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or
denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a
regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the
Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the
applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity
regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or
deny the application.
If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval
shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval,
or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted
by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific
information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the
hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the
action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk
and Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are
required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final
Plat Review.
C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations)
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a
mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during
the Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of
the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will
6
• •
sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted
by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County's subdivision process.
2. Applicability
Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the
Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision
process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot,
tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or
the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling
units, as further defined by Colorado state law.
3. Application / Submittal Requirements
In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the
Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision
Regulations.
An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form,
all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of the Subdivision
Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the
Preliminary Plan review process.
4. Process
The Final Plat review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application
is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC
for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the
satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department.
If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be
sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically
complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been
scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or
meeting and therefore does not require public notice.)
If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will
be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal
requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically
incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the
applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted.
Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been
established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the
application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information
satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of
approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for
review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification
issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to
have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all
required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department
7
• •
and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at
the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to
authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat.
Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and
Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet
thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final
Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process.
Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the
Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of
the applicant to complete the Final Plat process.
Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a
general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield
County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase
the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations
or access them on-line at:
http://www.qarfield-county.com/buildinq and planninq/index.htm
in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the
three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review,
and Final Plat Review.
I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information
which is correct and accur,ate to the best of my knowledge.
/
(Sig a re of applicant/owner)
Last Revised: 11/21/2002
8
if 0/ o y
Date
WAYNE RUDD
132 Park Ave.
Basalt, CO 81621
970-927-9119
Fax 927-4027
May 7, 2004
Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
108 8th St.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Overview Subdivision
Dear Mark:
•
Please be advised that I, as property owner, authorize Steve Oger, Rick Oger, and Gary Setnes to
act as my representatives and co -applicants, regarding the subdivision application and related
approval activities of Overview Subdivision.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
WayRudd
Owner, 29 Peaks, Parcel B
• •
Overview Subdivision, Garfield County, CO
The parcel to be subdivided is owned by Wayne Rudd. The three co -applicants Steve Oger,
Rick Oger au .' Gary Setness are long time employees of Rudd Construction. Upon Final f it
approval Wayne Rudd has agreed to sell the three lots at a greatly reduced price, so that these
employees will have the ability to build their own homes. All three of the employees are
renters, and have never owned homes in the Roaring Fork Valley. In all likelihood, this
opportunity would be their only possibility of owning their own homes.
It is anticipated that only one single family home and barn/accessory structure would be buil, on
each lot.
This Subdivision will be served by the following utilities:
Kinder Morgan Gas -
Holy Cross Electric -
Qwest Telephone -
All of these utilities are currently available on the proposed Lot 3. It is not known if cable T1
is available at this time. Utility easements to each lot will be provided on the fmal plat.
The proposed lots will be served by one common drive, and a drive easement will be provided
on the final plat. A driveway permit off of County Road 115 is in place.
The proposed lots will be served by the existing well, and a well sharing agreement will be in
place at the time of final plat.
Sewage disposal will be accomplished with Individual Septic Disposal Systems.
There are no known radiation hazards on the site.
There are no rivers or streams on the site, thus the proposed development will have no impact on
public waters.
Development will occur primarily on the Southernmost part of the parcel, which is less steep
than the topography to the North. Care will be taken to prevent erosion of any excavated areas.
It is proposed that the 3 lot owners will have an undivided 1/3 interest in the
common/agricultural lot.
(Joins sheet 14)
R. 88 W i R. 87
• •
Non -Technical Descriptions
Soil Survey Area: 655 ASPEN -GYPSUM AREA, COLORADO, PARTS OF
'T • !TT T !l • TI TT TTT T • %TT1 nTTTrTIT /l!ST TITTTT[T
Map unit: 95 Showalter-Morval complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Description Category: SOI
This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces, and valley sides. This unit is 45 percent
Showalter very stony loam and 35 percent Morval loam.
The Showalter soil is deep and well -drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly
from basalt. The surface is covered with 10 to 15 percent stones, 5 percent cobble,
and 5 percent gravel. The surface layer is very stony loam 8 inches thick. The upp
er 3 inches of the subsoil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches of the subsoil
is very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is very cobbly clay
loam. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is moderate. Effective
rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is
high to very high.
The Morval soil is deep and well -drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from
basalt. The surface layer is loam 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is
clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inch
es or more is loam. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is moderate.
Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water
erosion is very high.
Monday, July 19, 2004 Page 1 of 1
• •
?,;A111P�3i^J7141ii1d1511ICy3",idif{NV!3+�F:?i3l;F1ill�FdfflfilliG'dliili(SER!lUlIIlkitl;isE:7li�t.itt3fiplRUilHlitlJlfiS;lfBMRflllt;till;i7_'';1i61AIIGiGi;��dlFlG!:I!4g111ifd1lG:;i;i1�!?tiftll:lglif+1111tlldlf'illlli;AH�181d7&dfigi8fh2i51�((��E1t4AEf✓1�!!f@lilil3iiS1ti1E6�Ef
Non- Technical Descriptions
^.fi:l':Ifilli'isIlfitliliiliLyltfi6'r2r�3:Wt:Sn,:l'l;:(i.11[iIiI11111S1ki.;711tCTY!itiifttillrt�ni_a_.^,t61:llifli111ttidlBtlu,i,F.':11))�!IfltiVliui::�+tt;:111t:iI.Ulilltlltl,•::' :'"i!i(11!llft:lnlutBUI:C"il lltllitlilRtlllll',1:1i)S�iltO.`!!?1f176lfbiilln:evt.Zt3:L�:n1;111G1161i31t1{7p(1C91WWtIIWif7tD
Soil Survey Area: 655 ASPEN -GYPSUM AREA, COLO D O, PARTS OF
L�"1 ! a"'iT •- !•i G • t77; -:1T T' 1 AY'i[\ b'\TTTTTAT !-1 !lY YAYrnTT"1P
Map unit: 64 Jerry loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes
Description Category: SOI
This deep, wet -drained soil is on mountainsides. This soil formed in alluvium derived
from sandstone, shale, and basalt. The surface layer is stony loam about 3 Inohes
thick. The subsoil is cobbly clay loam about 37 inches thick. The substratum is cob
bly clay to a depth of 60 Inches. Permeability is slow, and available water capacity Is
moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more, Surface runoff is rapid, and the
erosion hazard Is vary high.
Map unit: 94 Showalter-Morval complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes
Description Category: SOI
This map unit 1s on alluvial fans, high terraces, and valley sides. This unit is 45 percent
Showalter very stony loam and 35 percent Morval loam.
The Showalter soil is deep and well-dralned. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly
from basalt, The surface is covered with 10 t0 15 percent stones. The surface layer is
very stony loam 8 inches thick. The upper 3 Inches of the subsoil is very cobbl
y clay loam. The lower 28 inches Is very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 80
inches or mors Is very cobbiy clay loam. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity
is moderate. Effective rooting depth Is 60 inches or more. Runoff Is rapid,
and the hazard of water erosion is moderate to high.
The Morval Soil is deep and well -drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from
basalt. The surface layer is loam 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is
clay loam. The lower 4 Inches are loam, The substratum to a depth of 60 Inc
hes or more Is loam. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is moderate.
Effective rooting depth Is 60 Inches or more. Runoff is medium to rapid, and the hazard
of water erosion is high to very high.
ti,ifBIHP)iZLIR a!!titE.'SdfadaDial IMIEttR'I1HH!al) 13E1F,11IO2KJI! ii6Eiil7I!iMilffif51711l11c1t911161111i1 tllPill1i:it.,llit; I:1'L'.I"%t11iIMYl:f italllKWtIupturn' tau tuiplAWifttium! tmzit:iunWSifg 11:,;;;;I farm Itioj MittidlCliIM114W
Tuesday, July 20, 2004 Page 1 of 1
v P.O. Box 1908
1005 Cooper Ave.
Glenwood Springs,
CO 81602
• •
Z4NC4NELL4 4110 4SSOCI4TES, INC.
ENGINEERING CONSULT1NTS
June 24, 2004
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
108 Eighth Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Overview Subdivision
Dear Mark:
(970) 945-5700
(970) 945-1253 Fax
This report presents the findings of the water supply investigations performed by
Zancanella and Associates, Inc. for the proposed Overview Subdivision. Information
contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses, legal water supply,
well pump test, and water quality analyses.
Water Requirements
The new subdivision will consist of 3 lots with one dwelling unit each. We have assumed
that each EQR will represent 3.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day.
Water will be diverted to irrigate up to 10,000 square feet of lawn or other equivalent
outside uses for each residence.
Legal Supply
As can be seen from Table 1, the subdivision will divert an average 2.66 AF annually, and
consumptively use 1.37 AF The peak month of June would require a continuous averag,
diversion of 3.63 gpm. The subdivision is to be supplied by a shared exempt domestic we!'
which has been drilled and tested.
The Overview Weil was drilled under permit number 2'x)0297 (copy attached). This is an
exempt domestic pc- mit, intended to serve a maximum of three residences and to be the
only well on the 43.82 acre tract.
Physical Supply
The Overview Well was completed on May 21, 2003 by Shelton Drilling Corporation at a
total depth of 160 feet. The well is located in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35,
Township 6 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.M. The location of the well can be plotted
1511 feet from the south section line and 325 feet from the east section line. The
approximate location of the well and Lhe Overview Subdivision boundary are shown on the
attached general location map. Figure 1. The well was drilled through a 20 foot section of
Tertiary basalt before entering the Pennsylvanian Maroon from 20 feet to the total depth of
• •
the well. A copy of the well construction report and a graphical representation of the well
(Figure 2) are attached.
A 4 hour pump test of the Overview Well was conducted on June 1, 2004 by J & M Pump
Company utilizing the electric submersible pump. The pump test was performed at a rate
of 15 gallons per minute (gpm). The rate was maintained at 15 gpm throughout the 4 hour
test period. The drawdown and time data collected during the test are presented in Table
2. We have plotted the results of the test in a water level vs. time curve as shown on the
attached Figure 3. The maximum drawdown during the 4 hour test was 0.17 feet. The
water level stabilized early in the test and did not vary through the remainder of the test.
Because of the relatively small amount of drawdown, no recovery data were collected. The
test indicates that the well will probably be able to operate for extended periods at a rate of
approximately 15 gpm. This amount, with water storage to handle peak demands, should
be adequate to serve the 3 lots. It is our understanding that 10,000 gallons of shared fire
and peak demand storage will be installed.
Water Quality
Water samples were collected during the pump test and sent to ACZ Laboratories in
Steamboat Springs for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for various
inorganic chemicals, nitrate/nitrite, total dissolved solids (TDS) and some of the physical
properties of the water. A total coliform bacteria sample was collected and sent to the
state lab in Grand Junction for analysis.
The coliform bacteria test indicates that coliform bacteria were absent from the sample.
The result from the bacteria test is attached. Results of the analyses from ACZ Labs are
pending. They will be forwarded to your office as soon as they are received.
If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
Zancanella and Associates, Inc.
( .(-2,4u.Fcv�iV`
Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E.
Bradley C. Pe= , Geologist
Attachments
cc: Wayne Rudd
Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Bean-WaterSupply.doc
2
Table 1
Overview Subdivision - Estimated Water Requirements
Domestic Demands Domestic Demands Other Demands
No. of EQR's Residential 3.0 units
No. of EQRs for ADU s 0.0 units
Pond Surface Area 0 acres
No. persons/residence 3.5 cap/unit
No. persons/unit 3.5 cap/unit
Annual Net Evaporation 2.74 ft
No. gallons/person/day 100 gpcd
No. gallons/person/day 100 gpcd
Percent Consumed 15%
Percent Consumed 15%
Lawn Irrigation 10000 sq-ft/unit
Lawn Irrigation 1500 sq-ft/unit
Irrigated Open Space 0 acres
Application Efficiency 80%
Application Efficiency 80%
Application Efficiency 80%
Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft
Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft
Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft
Water Use Calculations
Diversion Requirements Consumptive Use
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
Domestic ADUs Dom\Comm Open Space Pond Average Domestic ADUs Dom\Comm Open Space Pond Average
Month In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Evap. Total Flow for Dom In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Evap. Total Consumption
(ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm)
January 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11
February 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11
March 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11
April 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11
May 0.10 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.39 2.86 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.81
June 0.10 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.48 3.63 0.01 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.32 2.43
July 0.10 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.46 3.33 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.30 2.19
August 0.10 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.32 2.36 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.19 1.41
September 0.10 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.29 2.17 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.17 1.27
October 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.14 1.01 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.34
November 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11
December 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11
Annual 1.18 0.00 1.49 0.00 0.00 2.66 0.18 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 1.37
24 -Jun -04
Zancanella & Assoc., Inc.
Water Resources Engineers
Glenwood Springs, CO
Job# 97404.08\eqruse.xls
1'
.. � �4'. �•ET
R88W
•..770
7,75
7z
- ?426 •
G
ao
_ �f`.p-.> � � . `�-�..,�,-.,�.. ,...-•,r'.-'°-^"",,.tea
747i
„y✓•
Spi?teg .
•1
1
42a
•
4C
a
(Rana!! 1 0 00
Scale in Feet
T6S
T7S
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
SCALE:
= 2000'
DATE:
MAY 10, 2004
SHEET:
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
BCP
CHKD BY:
BCP
APPD BY:
TAZ
DRAWING:
LocTopo.dwg
OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION
ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A ?Z
ENG/NEER/NC CONSUL TANTS
POST OFFICE BOX 1906 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE
GLENWOOO SPRI N0S, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700
FIGURE NO.
1
PR0JECT-17404.08
GROUND
LEVEL
Tertiary Basalt
Pennsylvanian
Maroon formation
TOTAL DEPTH
160'
0
20-
40-
60-
80-
100-
120-
140-
160-
i
CEMENT 10'-40'
0' T ❑ 40'
9' HOLE DIAMETER
-1' TO 40'
0,240 WALL
7" PLAIN STEEL CSG
40' TO 160'
6.5' HOLE DIAMETER
36' TO 120'
0.250 WALL
5,5' PVC CSG
STATIC WATER LEVEL 107.0'
ON JUNE 1, 2004
120' TO 160'
0,250 WALL
5.5" PVC PERF CSG
OVEKVIEW WELL
WELL DETAIL
SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
DATE
JUNE 22, 2004
SHEET
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
BCP
CHKD BY:
BCP
APPD BY:
TAZ
PLAN NO.
WellDetail.dwg
OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION
ZANCANELLA ANL' ASSOCIATES, INC
ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS
POST CFFICE BOX 1900 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE
GLENw000 SPRINGS, COLORADO 01802 (970) 945-5700
FIGURE NO.
PROJECT: 1 74,04 08
• •
Well ID:
TABLE 2
Pump Test Data
Overview Subdivision Well
Job No.: 17404.08
Client: Wayne Rudd
Test By: J & M Pump
Analysis By: BCP
M.P. = Top of Casing
Q = 15 gpm
r= ft
107.0 ft
b= ft
Time/Date on: 6/1/04 8:30 AM
Time/Date off: 6/1/04 12:30 PM
Test Length: 4:00:00 total time
TIME
Time
(minutes)
W.L. Measurement
Drawdown
(feet)
Q
(gpm)
t'
(minutes)
tit'
(feet)
(inches)
6/1/04 8:30 AM
0
107
0.0
SWL
0
6/1/04 8:31 AM
1
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:32 AM
2
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:33 AM
3
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:34 AM
4
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:35 AM
5
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:36 AM
6
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:37 AM
7
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:38 AM
8
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:39 AM
9
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:40 AM
10
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:42 AM
12
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:44 AM
14
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:46 AM
16
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:50 AM
20
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 8:55 AM
25
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 9:00 AM
30
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 9:10 AM
40
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 9:20 AM
50
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 9:30 AM
60
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 9:45 AM
75
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 10:00 AM
90
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 10:15 AM
105
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 10:30 AM
120
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 11:00 AM
150
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 11:30 AM
180
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 12:00 PM
210
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/1/04 12:30 PM
240
107
2.0
0.17
15
6/23/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well Pump Test.xls
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
m 70
J 80
L.
1.1 90
10(
1
10
Figure 3
Pumping Test - 6/1/04
Overview Subdivision Well
100 Time (min) 1,oco
10,000
100,000
Q = 15 gpm throughout test.
110
120
130
140
150
160
Pump Set at 155 ft.
Total Depth = 160 ft.
6/3/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc.
Static Water Level = 107.0 ft.
Well Pump Test.xls
Ill
Form No. OFFICE OF E ,.,TATE ENGINEER •
GWS-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Deriver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
APPLICANT
RUDD CONSTRUCTION
0132 PARK AVE
BASALT, CO 81621-
(970) 927-9119
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
1095
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297
DIV. 5 WD38 DES. BASIN MD
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 35
Township 6 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
Ft. from
Ft. from
UTM COORDINATES
Northing:
Section Line
Section Line
Easting:
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit
does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested
water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval
of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation
Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 43.82 acres described as that portion
of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4, Sec. 35, Twp. 6 South, Rng. 88 West, 6th P.M., Garfield County, more particularly described on
the attached exhibit A. This well is identified as the Parcel B Well.
4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside not more than
three (3) single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one (1) acre of home gardens and lawns, and the watering
of domestic animals.
5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM.
6) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the
non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located.
7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit.
NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2187-354-00-145
NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R007347
APPROVED
DMW
Receipt No. 0509413C
03
State Engineer By
05-14-2003
DATE ISSUED
EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-2005
Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:52 AM
Wayne 5nelton 9/U-921-tsU1
p. u1
WELL CONSTRUCTIOOAND TEST REPORT
STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
111111 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
APPROVAL # OWS31-91.03
1.
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297
2
Owner Name(s): Rudd Construction
Mailing Address: 0132 Park Ave.
City, State, Zip : Basalt, Co. 81621
Phone # : 970-927-9119
L
WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED
NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec: 35 Twp: 6 5 Range: 88 W
DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES
1511 ft. from South Sec. line and 325 ft. from East Sec. line OR Northing: Easting:
SUBDIVISION: 29 Peaks LOT: B BLOCK: FILING (UNIT):
STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION
4.
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary
DATE COMPLETED: 5/21/2003 TOTAL DEPTH: 160 DEPTH COMPLETION: 160
5.
GEOLOGIC LOG
6. HOLE DIAMETER (in)
PROM (ft)
TO (11)
Depth
Type of Material (Size, Color. and Type)
9.0
0
40
40
160
000-020
Volcanics
6.5
020-160
Maroon Formation
7. PLAIN CASING
OD (in)
Kind
Wall Size
From (ft)
To (ii)
7.0
Steel
0.240
-1
40
5.5
PVC
0.250
36
120
PERF. CASING : Screen Slot Size
5.5
PVC
0.250
120
160
Water Located: 120+
Remarks :
8. Filter Pack
Material :
Size .
Interval :
9. Packer Placement
Type :
Depth .
10. GROUTING RECORD
Material
Amount
Density
Interval
Placement
Cement
5 sks
6 gal/sk
10-40
poured
i 1. D1SINFI✓CTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 3 oz_
12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental
TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor
Static Level : 105 ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Production Rate 15 gpm
Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Test Length : 2 hours
Test Remarks :
13.I have read the st¢tcmcnts made heroin anal Irstow tha eoutants thereof, and that they ets hue to my knowledge. (Pursuant to Section 24-4-1-4 (13)(a) CRS. the making of false statements
cttsl.itutes perjtuy in the eccond do gr�te and is punishable sa a class 1 misdemeanor.)
CONTRACTOR : Sh®lton Drilling Corp. Phone _ (970) 927-4182
Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 81621 Lic, No. 1095
Name / Title (Please Type or Print)
Wayne Shelton / President
Signature
Date
6/26/2003
Colonia o.prtesent
of Public Health
aad Fawaemmc
LABORATORY & RADIATION SERVICES
8100 LOWRY BOULEVARD
DENVER, CO 80230-6928
US MAIL
PO BOX 17123
DENVER, CO 80217
WATER
BACTERIOLOGY
-1-0 Le_ I 11
SAMPLE INFORMATION: 0 COMMUNITY 0 NON -COMMUNITY PRIVATE
0 ROUTINE '®.FLAW 0 REPEAT FOR THE MONTH OF
4/
-SPECIAL PURPOSE 0 FINISHED
iL/��EeI/I Et.)
PWS ID
NAM SYSTEM
&'Ab //-5—
CHLORINE RESIDUAL
MG/L
ADDRESS
CITY COUNTY
ORDERED
ORDERED BY: (SAMPLE MAY NOT BE TESTED IF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED)
FEE STAMP
LAB 106 (07/97)
(97v 9L5 -57 -
PHONE
NAME
/COS 6,) �A;4711/1
ADDRESS
47--5-x/ \[Oob SP,z/A--'GTS, Ci .f'l&e" J
CITY ; STATE i ZIP
TEST ORDERED u STD SACT ❑ OTHER
COLLECTED
// DATE TIME BY
ip/D//O�7A141::
/ ❑ AM
RECEIVED / ` 0 PM
RESULTS: SEE REVERSE FOR ELA ON
TOTAL COLIFORM ❑ PRESENT ABSENT
MOST PROBABLE NO
❑ DENVER
ANALYST
COLIFORM/100ML
AN • LYJ GRD. JCT.
72932214-22
P.O. Box 1908
1005 Cooper Ave.
Glenwood Springs,
CO 81602
RECEI
JUL 0 6 2004
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Z4NC414ELL4 4(111) 4550Cl4TES, Inc.
ENGINEERING CONSULT4NTS
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
108 Eighth Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Overview Subdivision
Dear Mark:
July 2, 2004
(970) 945-5700
(970) 945-1253 Fax
In our letter report of June 24, 2004, we discussed the water supply for the proposed
Overview Subdivision. At that time we had not received the water quality results from the
lab. This report talks about the final water quality results and is to serve as a supplement
to the June 24 report.
Water Quality
Water samples were collected during the pump test of the Overview Well and sent to ACZ
Laboratories in Steamboat Springs for independent analyses. The lab tests included
analyses for various inorganic chemicals, nitrate/nitrite, total dissolved solids (TDS) and
some of the physical properties of the water. A total coliform bacteria sample was
collected and sent to the state lab in Grand Junction for analysis.
The coliform bacteria test indicates that coliform bacteria were absent from the sample.
The result from the bacteria test is attached. Results of the analyses from ACZ Labs are
also attached and are summarized in the table below:
Analyte
Lab Result
Maximum Contam.
Level (MCL)
Units
Arsenic
0.0017
0.05
mg/I
Barium
0.381
2
mg/I
Beryllium
Not Detected
0.004
mg/I
Cadmium
Not Detected
0.005
mg/I
Calcium
43.7
N/A
mg/I
Chromium
Not Detected
0.1
mg/I
Copper
Not Detected
1-3
mg/I
Iron
0.05
0.3
mg/I
Lead
Not Detected
0.015
mg/I
Magnesium
7.5
N/A
mg/I
Manganese
Not Detected
0.05
mg/1
Mercury
Not Detected
0.002
mg/1
t
•
•
Nickel
Not Detected
N/A
mg/I
Potassium
0.8
N/A
mg/I
Selenium
Not Detected
0.05
mg/I
Silver
Not Detected
0.10
mg/I
Sodium
5.2
N/A
mg/I
Thallium
Not Detected
0.002
mg/I
Alkalinity
147
N/A
mg/I
Chloride
2
250
mg/I
Conductivity
249
N/A
/.mhos/cm
Fluoride
0.1
4
mg/I
Hardness
140
N/A
mg/I
Nitrate
0.55
10
mg/I
Nitrite
Not Detected
1
mg/I
pH
7.4
N/A
pH Units
Sulfate
Not Detected
250
mg/I
mg/I
TDS
150
500
Turbidity
0.1
1
Nephelometric Units
ote: Maximum Contaminant Levels are established by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment and the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
As can be seen from the above table, for all of the analytes tested, none were above their
respective MCLs.
If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
Zancanella and Associates, Inc.
Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E.
Bradley C. Pee , Geologist
Attachments
cc: Wayne Rudd
Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Bean-WaterQual.doc
Parameter`
ACZ
Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487(800) 334-5493
Zancanella & Associates
Project ID: RUDD/OVERVIEW
Sample ID: OVERVIEW WELL
Inorganic Analytical'
Results,
ACZ Sample ID:
Date Sampled:
Date Received:
Sample Matrix:
L46086-01
06/01/04 11:40
06/03/04
Drinking Water
Metals Analysis
EPA Method
Result Quat XQ Units
MDL PQL Date
Arsenic, total
recoverable
Barium, total
recoverable
Beryllium, total
recoverable
Cadmium, total
recoverable
Calcium, dissolved
Chromium, total
recoverable
Copper, total
recoverable
Iron, total recoverable
Lead, total recoverable
Magnesium, dissolved
Manganese, total
recoverable
Mercury, total
Nickel, total
recoverable
Potassium, dissolved
Selenium, total
recoverable
Silver, total recoverable
Sodium, dissolved
Thallium, total
recoverable
Metals Prep
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.3 iCP-MS
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M245.1 CVAA
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M200.8 ICP -MS
M200.7 ICP
M200.7 ICP
M200.8 ICP -MS
0.0017
0.381
43.7
0.05
7.5
0.8
5.2
B
u
u
u
B
u
u
u
u
B
u
u
u
mg/L
0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 20:49
mg/L 0.003 0.01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
06/10/04 0:43
0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 20:49
0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 6:40
0.2 1 06/23/04 20:53
0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 6:40
0.003 0.01 06/25/04 6:40
0.01 0.05
0.0005 0.003
0.2 1
0.005 0.03
06/15/04 13:04
06/25/04 6:40
06/23/04 20:53
06/10/04 0:43
Analyst
jb
scp
jb
jb
wfg
jb
jb
scp
jb
wfg
scp
0.0002 0.001 06/21/04 14:54 jjc
0.01 0.05 06/10/04 0:43 scp
0.3 1 06/10/04 11:47 wfg
0.0005 0.003 06/29/04 23:09 jb
0.005 0.03 06/17/04 9:47
0.3 1 06/24/04 15:51
0.0003 0.001 06/25/04 6:40
R� irrt: aiia' xa CTrit L' -f ` • mot t ry
Total Recoverable
Digestion
Total Recoverable
Digestion
M200.2 ICP -MS
M200.2 ICP
06/22/04 15:47
scp
scp
jb
Icj
06/16/04 8:06 wfg
REPIN.01.11.00.01
Please refer to Extended Qualifier Report for detail.
L46086: Page 3 of 9
• •
AZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487(800) 334-5493
Zancaneila & Associates
Project ID: RUDD/OVERVIEW
Sample ID: OVERVIEW WELL
Inorganic Analytical
Results
ACZ Sample ID: L46086-01
Date Sampled: 06/01/04 11:40
Date Received: 06/03/04
Sample Matrix: Drinking Water
Wet Chemistry
Parameter
EPA Method Result Qual. XQ Unites, MDL PQL Date,:
Alkalinity as CaCO3
Bicarbonate as
CaCO3
Carbonate as CaCO3
Hydroxide as CaCO3
Total Alkalinity
Cation -Anion Balance Calculation
Cation -Anion Balance
Sum of Anions
Sum of Cations
SM2320B - Titration
Analyst
147 mg/L 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 bf
U
U
147
mg/L 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 bf
mg/L 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 bf
mg/L 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 bf
0.0 % 07/01/04 0:00
3.0 meq/L 0.1 0.5 07/01/04 0:00
3.0 meq/L 0.1 0.5 07/01/04 0:00
Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric 2 B mg/L 1 5 06/19/04 15:18
Color M110.1 - Colorimetric UH * Co/Pt 5 5 06/04/04 10:07
Conductivity @25C M120.1 - Meter 249 um hos/cm 1 10 06/05/04 12:58
Fluoride SM4500F-C 0.1 B mg/L 0.1 0.5 06/17/04 10:07
Hardness as CaCO3 SM2340B - Calculation 140 mg/L 1 7 07/01/04 0:00
Lab Filtration SM 3030 B 06/04/04 9:40
Lab Filtration & SM 3030 B 06/04/04 13:00
Acidification
Nitrate as N, dissolved Calculation: NO3NO2 minus NO2 0.55 mg/L 0.02 0.1 07/01/04 0:00 calc
Nitrate/Nitrite as N, M353.2 - Automated Cadmium 0.55 H mg/L 0.02 0.1 06/03/04 20:36 jjr
dissolved Reduction
Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automated Cadmium UH * mg/L 0.01 0.05 06/03/04 18:43
Reduction
pH (lab) M150.1 - Electrometric 7.4 H units 0.1 0.1 06/05/04 12:58 bf
Residue, Filterable SM2540C - Gravimetric 180 mg/L 10 20 06/08/04 12:12 mah
(TDS) @180C
Sulfate M375.3 - Gravimetric U * mg/L 10 50 06/17/04 9:24 djb
TDS (calculated) Calculation 150 mg/L 10 50 07/01/04 0:00 calc
TDS (ratio - Calculation 1.20 07/01/04 0:00 calc
measured/calculated)
Turbidity M180.1 - Nephelometric 0.1 BH * NTU 0.1 0.5 06/04/04 10:26 bf
calc
calc
calc
kmc
bf
bf
mah
calc
bd
bd
REPIN.01.11.00.01 " Please refer to Extended Qualifier Report for detail.
L46086: Page 4 of 9
Colorado
of Public' i h t
and Erroroomeot
LABORATORY & RADIATION SERVICES
8100 LOWRY BOULEVARD
DENVER, CO 80230-6928
US MAIL
PO BOX 17123
DENVER, CO 80217
WATER
BACTERIOLOGY
SAMPLE INFORMATION: 0 COMMUNITY 0 NON -COMMUNITY `PRIVATE
❑ ROUTINEAW 0 REPEAT FOR THE MONTH OF
SPECIAL PURPOSE 0 FINISHED
PWS ID
/v,> /o/ aVI & )
NAME,gF SYSTEM CHLORINEAL
MG/L
ADDRESS CITY OUNTY
COLLECTED
DATE TIME J]-� BY
4 Pi/Dy"��oo �PM ss
/ ❑ AM
RECEIVED f / 0 PM
ORDERED BY: (SAMPLE MAY NOT BE TESTED IF ALL INFORMATION iS NOT PROVIDED)
(97 2 )%1-1-5-- 57125
FEE STAMP
LAB 106 (07/97)
PHONE
2470 G' /4-,ci EL -c-.4 i7�S e,
NAME
/COS 6,1) ",-4 4/6
ADDRESS
4ZF hada SP,i,UcTS, eie e
CITY / STATE / ZIP
TEST ORDERED VI -STD BACT. 0 OTHER
RESULTS: SEE REVERSE FOR ELA ON
TOTAL COLIFORM 0 PRESENT ABSENT
MOST PROBABLE NO
0 DENVER
ANALYST
COLIFORM/100ML
AN
GRD. JCT.
• •
Overview Subdivision, Garfield County, CO
The parcel to be subdivided is owned by Wayne Rudd. The three co -applicants Steve Oger,
Rick Oger and Gary Setness are long time employees of Rudd Construction. Upon Final Plat
approval Wayne Rudd has agreed to sell the three lots at a greatly reduced price, so that these
employees will have the ability to build their own homes. All three of the employees are
renters, and have never owned homes in the Roaring Fork Valley. In all likelihood, this
opportunity would be their only possibility of owning their own homes.
It is anticipated that only one single family home and barn/accessory structure would be built on
each. lot.
This Subdivision will be served by the following utilities:
Kinder Morgan Gas -
Holy Cross Electric -
Qwest Telephone -
All of these utilities are currently available on the proposed Lot 3. It is not known if cable TV
is available at this time. Utility easements to each lot will be provided on the final plat.
The proposed lots will be served by one common drive, and a drive easement will be provided
on the final plat.
The proposed lots will be served by the existing well, and a well sharing agreement will be in
place at the time of final plat.
Sewage disposal will be accomplished with Individual Septic Disposal Systems.
There are no rivers or streams on the site, thus the proposed development will have no impact on
public waters.
Development will occur primarily on the Southernmost part of the parcel, which is less steep
than the topography to the North. Care will be taken to prevent erosion of any excavated areas.
It is proposed that the 3 lot owners will have an undivided 1/3 interest in the
common/agricultural lot.
Aug 30 04 01:41p
AUG 3 0 2004
District 1
970-945-1318
•
Garfield County
Road and Bridge, District 1
7300 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-1223 ph, 945-1318 fax
Date: 08-30-04
To: Jim Hardcastle
Building and Planning
From: Bobby Branham
Road and Bridge Dist. 1
Re: 8575 CR 115
Allow for a subdivision sketch plan oVeVV/eh/
With regards to this particular subdivision:
Upon reviewing the above request Road and Bridge does not oppose the usage of
a single driveway as an access for three residences. However, this existing driveway is
only 20 feet wide. This width is inadequate for a three resident access. Road and Bridge
recommends that the driveway be widened to 40 feet in order to accommodate the
increased amount of traffic as compared to a single residence. All other aspect of the
driveway area acceptable.
The applicant states "A driveway permit off CR 115 is in place." This is not a true
statement. A driveway permit was issued on or about April 15`h 2003. Driveway permits
are only valid for a period of 30 days, and this permit in particular was issued under the
pretence that it would be for a single family residence. No other permits have been
issued; therefore, a new permit will be required.
Bobby Branham
Dist. 1 Road and Bridge
p.1