Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application• • • \RD 51J3E\J5Io4 1 L CNe NO. 3 A 5ubdivi Sion in por'Hon o -F S cHon5 2 5 4 2G, T wr) i -,i p Jou-t-h, ( an9e, 92 Was+, o. he Co' P.M. P R LI M I N AJ Y PLAT PRET-IQ+.4 Sub rnif+¢d i`o Cinrfiq,d Cour)-1-Y Co on m i 5si o ne -phis 26th d ey of (r '3 -For +hair review and ...Du I .iv0 f. : Char'1 rk,ezy' • • June 26, 1973 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS v) z PRELIMINARY FINAL PLAT I also enclose a tentative final plat layout at 1" = 200'. This tenta- z tive plat includes a vicinity map,a written legal description of 11' the development, and a table of land use showing the 31 single family residential sites on 196.3 acres plus 7.22 acres in roads for a total area of 203.52 acres, resulting in a density of one dwel- ling unit per 6.33 net acres. O o RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS A copy of the protective covenants for Asgard Subdivision 3rd Filing is enclosed. 303-945-8596 COLORADO z BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF GARFIELD Garfield County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Gentlemen: Attached is the preliminary plat for Asgard Subdivision Filing No. 3, containing 203.52 acres. The attached binder includes the de- tailed information required by you, in accordance with applicable Garfield County Subdivision Regulations, for the approval of this preliminary plat. An index of the documents included follows: PRELIMINARY PLAT -- 2 sheets This preliminary plat, at a scale of 1" = 100', depicts the lot layout, road alignment, topography at 5 ft. contour intervals, drain- age easements, and surrounding ownership. The plat also includes the name of the proposed development, name and address of the owner - developer and the name and address of the firm preparing the plat. CONSULTING ENGINEERING COMPANY 818 COLORADO AVENUE UTILITY DEDICATION Easements are reserved 15 feet in width, 7.5 feet on each side of all interior lot lines, and 15 feet in width along the subdivision boundary lines for utility purposes. PRELIMINARY PLAT - UTILITIES • Copies of letter or reports concerning utilities in this subdivision are included in this submittal as follows: 1. Report on the Water Supply System for Asgard Subdivision Third Filing dated 15 June 1973 including a supplemental exhibit "Location and Data on Existing Domestic Wells." 2. Letter from Colorado Department of. Health concerning indi- vidual sewage disposal facilities. 3. Letter from Public Service Company of Colorado concerning availability of electricity to the development. PLAN AND PROFILE OF ROAD - 3 sheets The road grade and center line alignment are indicated on standard plan • REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS • • co DRAINAGE REPORT ON ASGARD SUBDIVISION -•- 3rd Filing L' Date of Report 15 June 1973 There are three major drainage channels which cross the 3rd Filing - Asgard Subdivision. The flood flows computed for these channels are as follows: Drainage Area Flood Fleas (cfs) CD 25 Yr. 100 Yr. CO A 375 821 COLORADO vi CD z 0 cn B 51 64 C 119 145 Channel A is located near the west end of the subdivision and is passed beneath the road by an 8 -foot by 12 -foot box culvert. This culvert and the drainage easement both upstream and downstream from it are adequate to pass a 100 year frequency flood. We do recommend that some rip -rap be placed both at the upper and lower cn O end of the culvert for bank protection and security of the road, cc •z _ Channel B is located in the eastern part of Lot 43 of this filing. The drainage easement is adequate to carry a 100 year flood. We recommend w . that a 42" diameter pipe be installed where this channel crosses the road to carry the 100 year. runoff. CD x Channel. C is located in Filing No 2 and crosses beneath the road which 0 leads to Filing No. 3. We recommend that a 60" diameter culvert be placed in this channel to carry a 100 year frequency flood. O ° The drainage easements proposed in the subdivision should very adequate- ly provide for 100 year flood runoff protection and no individual lot should be endangered by such a storm. CONSULTING z a 0 0 0 cc O z w w z W 0 0 o 818 COLORADO AVENUE Respectfully, • 'Jerome F. Gamba P.E.&L.S. 5933 • • • and profile sheets at a horizontal scale of 1" = 100' and a vertical scale of 1" = 10'. Essentially the road follows the existing topo- graphy. Revised contours are shown where the road departs appreciable from natural ground line and crosses the bo:; culvert which provides for 100 year flood runoff protection. DRAINAGE STUDY The general drainage conditions as well as the impact of both 25 year and 100 year frequency storm runoffs have been investigated anda copy of the resulting Drainage Report dated 15 June. 1973 is attached. SOIL TESTING Chen and Associates of Denver were engaged to do the Geological and Sub -Soil Investigations. A copy of their report is enclosed. SOIL CONSERVATION A copy of the Soil and Water Conservation Plan prepared by the Book - cliff Conservation District is enclosed. WILDLIFE This subdivision could have a marginal impact on wildlife species in the area. Accordingly, the Colorado Division of Wildlife has been alerted to this development and asked to review and comment in accordance with the existing Garfield County Subdivision Regula- tions. This preceding information constitutes what 1 understand you require. I respectfully submit this for your action and approval. Very Truly Yours, Charles J. Becker for Asgard Subdivision Filing No. 3 • e Service (=Rang C©l®mandI® Box 152 Rifle, Co. 81650 June 25, 1973 Mr. Charles Becker Eldorado Engineering Company P 0 Box 669 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Dear Chuck, Eldorado Engineering Company has requested a letter indicating availability of electric service to Asgard Sub. #3• am pleased to inform you that electric service is available in this area with suitable construction contracts and provision for rights-of-way. Yours Truly, �Gs'+ r�l j Miland Dunivent, District Manager Public Service Co. of Co. Box 152 Rifle, Co. 81650 • • REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS 303-945-8596 SPRINGS, COLORADO GLENWOOD LLI rn O 0 CONSULTING r z m 2 0 0 ENGINEERING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR ASGARD SUBDIVISION - THIRD FILING Date of Report: June 15, 1973 It is proposed that Asgard Subdivision - Third Filing be served by individual wells. Proof of available water for such. wells is the history and characteristics of existing wells in the immediate vicin- ity of the subdivision. Examination of the apparent geologic charac- teristics of the area further substantiates ground water availability. The success of domestic water well drilling in the vicinity of. Asgard Subdivision, Third Filing, is very good. Investigation indicates the presence of at least ten successful wells within a one -mile radius of this development. These wells range from 50 to 300 feet deep and have proven production ranging from 7 to 25 gpm. The locations and characteristics of wells on the Asgard Subdivision are,illustrated on the attached plat. The geologic conditions believed to be responsible for the ground water in this area are as follows: The area is underlain by the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Formation. This formation is comprised of a series of interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale horizons. The water encountered in the drilled wells is supplied from the sandstone horizons, which are relatively porous and permeable. The recharge area, (location of water input into the formation), is probably along the southeasterly extention of the formation outcrop which forms that part of the Grand Hogback extending from the Marble area to Stilt. Additional recharge is prob- ably contributed to the formation in the outcrop areas on the south- east rim of the Grand Mesa. As is the case with the majority of western slope aquifers, this aquifer has not been subjected to de- tailed hydrological :investigation because the impact of water extrac- tion has been so slight in comparison to the extent of the formation and potential recharge volume. In the vicinity of the Asgard Subdivision, the sedimentary beds dip southerly. The dip angle varies from a few degrees near Silt to nearly 45° on the hogback. The individual wells are not all draw- ing water from the same sandstone horizon but are tapping several distinct sandstone beds and in some cases are drawing water from the alluvial fan overlaying the Mesaverde suboutcrop. While this alluvial fan is undoubtedly receiving some recharge from surface water in the immediate vicinity, the majority of the recharge is derived from the underlaying Mesaverde Formation. • • • In conclusion, it :is my opinion that considering the geology of the area, that this area will support a substantial number of low pro- duction (5 to 15 gpm.) domestic wells without: resulting in a signifi- cant water table drawdown. Respectfully, Jerome F. Gamba, P.E. & L.S. 5933 64 • ------- • chen and associates, inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SOIL & FOUNDATION 96 S. ZUNI • DENVER. COLORADO 80223 • 303/744-7105 ENGINEERING 1924 EAST FIRST STREET • CASPER, WYOMING 82601 • 307/234-2126 PRELIMINARY GEOLOGICAL AND SUBSOIL INVESTIGATION ASGARD SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 3 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: ELDORADO ENGINEERING COMPANY 803 COLORADO AVENUE GLENW00D SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 • Job No. 9711 June 18, 1973 • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS 1 SCOPE 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 GEOLOGIC SETTING 2 SUBSOILS AND BEDROCK 3 Subsoils 3 Bedrock 3 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS EFFECTING CONSTRUCTION 4 FOUNDATION TYPES 5 CUT AND FILL 5 DRAINAGE 5 MISCELLANEOUS 6 FIG. 1.- VICINITY MAP FIG. 2 - LOCATION OF TEST PITS AND EXPOSURES FIG. 3 - SLOPE MAP FIG. 4 - SURFICIAL GEOLOGY FIG. 5 - LOGS OF TEST PITS AND EXPOSURES FIGS. 6, 7, and 8 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS • • • • • CONCLUSIONS (1) The subdivision is feasible considering the geological and soil conditions. (2) Steep slopes in the north on a small area flood potential are the main gological hazards. (3) Subsoils consist of clayey sands and sandy clays overlying claystone and sandstone bedrock. Spread footing foundations are suitable. SCOPE This report presents the results of a preliminary geological and subsoil investigation for a 200 + acre parcel, known as Asgard Subdivision, Filing No. 3, 21 miles north of Silt, Garfield County, Colorado. The general subsoil conditions, most suitable foundation types, and geological conditions which have an effect on the development are discussed in this report. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development is to consist of 31 single family lots. The lots vary from 2 acres to 19 acres in size. Individual wells and septic systems are planned. SITE CONDITIONS The 200 + acre parcel investigated is about 21 miles northwest of Silt, Garfield County, Colorado as shown on the Vicinity Map, Fig. 1. The property is in portions of Sections 25 and 26, Township 5 South, Range 92 West. The extreme northern part of the area is mountainous with steep to very steep slopes (306 to greater than 50%). The remainder of the property lies • • • • 2 • on a moderately sloping pediment surface. This is a relatively smooth surface which slopes from 8% to 3% down to the southeast. Elevations at the property are from 5900 in the lower southeast corner to 6360 in the mountainous area. Several small ephemeral streams have incised narrow channels into the upper parts of the pediment. These stream channels are close to the pediment surface near the southern boundary of the property. The largest of these streams crosses the center of the property diagonally to the southeast. Large sandstone boulders in the channel of this stream indicate major floods have occured here in the past. The water table was not encountered in any of the test pits and the water table is expected to be quite deep over the entire property. The only construction done at the site at the time of this investigation was the grading of Odin Drive and the construction of concrete box culverts along the road and the drainage way. The Farmers Irrigation Co. Ditch crosses the southeast part of the filing. Scattered juniper and a few pinyon pines with sagebrush grow on the upper slopes. Grass and sagebrush predominate on the lower slopes. Climate of the area is semi -arid with a mean annual precipitation of around 16 inches. January mean maximum and minimum temperatures are 88° F. and 480 F. Intense "cloud burst" rains occasionally occur in the area and cause flooding along major drainage ways. GEOLOGIC SETTING The property is at the lower southern flank of the Grand Hogback. Erosionally resistant sandstones of the Cretaceous age Mesa Verde formation have formed this prominant east -west ridge. The steeply southerly dipping sandstones • 3- • • and interstratlfied claystones at the site have been eroded to a pediment. Only the extreme northern part still stands as mountainous topography. The surface of this pediment is covered by a thick to thin clayey fine sand and sandy clay soil. Some small areas of sandstone bedrock crop out on the pediment surface as shown on Fig. 4. SUBSOILS AND BEDROCK Subsoil and bedrock conditions at the site were investigated by examining exposures in outcrop and in road and stream cuts. In addition, six test pits were excavated with a backhoe. Location of exposures and test pits are shown on Fig. 2. Undisturbed hand drive samples were taken and returned to our laboratory for analysis of engineering properties. Subsoils: The predominant surface which covers most of the site is underlain • by a thin to thick, light brown, medium dense, stratified, very calcareous, clayey, fine sand to medium stiff, sandy clay. The deposit is primarily a clayey fine sand but some strata are fine, sandy silts and clays and some have rounded cobbles and gravel of sandstone. Swell -consolidation tests run on this material indicate that the clayey fine sands will consolidate slightly under wetting and loading. The siltier strata show a moderate consolidation under wetting and loading. Bedrock: Underlying the soils of the pediment and cropping out in the northerr, part of the site are sandstones and claystones of the Mesa Verde formation. On the pediment, the rocks are at the surface in a few places, lie shallow in other places, and exceed a depth of 10 feet elsewhere. The depth to bedrock is erratic and could not precisely be determined for the entire site by this • investigation. Sandstone beds predominate and are interstratlfied with claystone • • • 4- • beds several tens of feet thick. The rock dips steeply to the south which causes the sandstone and claystone to occur as east -west trending band in outcrop and subcrop. The sandstone is a light grey, moderately jointed, strongly cemented, fine grained, quartz sandstone. The claystone is a dark grey, fine blocky, hard, friable claystone. Swell -consolidation tests run on samples of this claystone show only a slight amount of swell when wetted under load (see Figs. 6 and 7). GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS EFFECTING CONSTRUCTION Conditions of a geologic nature which could have an effect on the proposed construction are steep slopes and flood ways. The steep slopes in the mountainous area at the extreme northern part of the property appear to be quite stable under the natural conditions existing at present. These slopes are underlain by competent rocks which are close to the surface. We recommend that construction on slopes greater than 50% be avoided and construction on slopes between 30% and 50% be conducted with care and caution. Of the three lots effected, Lots 24, 25, and 26, there should be many suitable building sites if properly selected. We recommend that building sites not be located on steep slopes adjacent to the incised stream channels at the upper parts of the pediment. If soils on these slopes become saturated, they could slide. These potential slide areas are relatively small in comparison to lot size and should be no problem In avoiding. A potential flood way, as shown on Fig. 3, exists along the primary ephermeral streams. The relative deep channel near the upper part of the site will confine any flood waters in that area but where the channel becomes shallow, at,the • lower part of the property, flood waters could fan out over the pediment surface. • • A hydrologist should investigate this area to determine the extent and frequency of flooding along this stream. There appear to be suitable building sites away from this hazard on the adjacent lots. FOUNDATION TYPES The most suitable foundation for the soil conditions will be spread footings. Maximum soil pressures will range from about 1,000 psf and the loose, fine grained soils to 6,000 psf on the hard bedrock. Foundations placed on the claystone bedrock should be kept narrow to minimize the swell potential of this material. Foundations on steep slopes must be placed well back from the slope and onto firm bearing. If heavy structures are planned, straight -shaft piers drilled into bedrock would be a possible alternative. Specific design criteria would depend on the type and depth of bedrock. CUT AND FILL Cuts and fills should be kept to a minimum. Cut and fill slopes should be less than 11:1. Steeper slopes will ravel and not revegetate easily. Cuts should be carefully considered in the steep terrain. Dip of the rock is parallel to the slope and rock fall can be expected if these beds are undercut. Fills should be keyed into the side slopes. The vegetation and organic soils should be stripped prior to placing fills. DRAINAGE Natural drainage should be maintained. Where roads cross drainages, consideration should be given to culverts and lateral ditches. Final grade • • • around buildings should provide for good drainage away from the buildings in all directions. MISCELLANEOUS This report is preliminary in nature but is in sufficient detail to indicate general conditions. Particular attention has been given to identifying potential problem areas. The report provides information for planning and initial construc- tion. We suggest more detailed investigation for specific design criteria for foundations of large scale earth work. If we can provide additional information or be of further service, please let us know. CHEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RGM/dlr By Reviewed By Ra ph G, Mock, Engineering Geologist Richard C. Hepworth, P. E. • 34 #9711 4 _.135 5 ( 24 • • 25 36 VICIN TY MAP Sca 1 e : 11=2nnn' REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS CC w w z 6 z w CONSULTING 303-945-8596 P. 0. BOX 669 818 COLORADO April 2, 1973 Board 'of County Commissioners Garfield County, Colorado Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Gentlemen: I have been authorized by Charles J. Becker, the sole owner of Asgard Subdivision, Filing No. 3, to write this letter concerning the supplemental information. The supplemental information furnished with the preliminary plat is valid for the Final Plat. Sincerely, Norman H. Hunt LS 10,732 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELDORADO ENGINEERING COMPANY 303-945-6917 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 P. O. BOX 669 803 COLORADO AVENUE • May 31, 1972 Supplement to Water Supply Report, Asgard Subdivision, Third Filing, Dated April 18, 1972 The success of domestic water well drilling in the vicinity of As- gard Subdivision, Third Filing, is very good. Investigation indi- cates the presence of at least ten successful wells within a one - mile radius of this development. These wells range from 50 to 300 feet deep and have proven production ranging from 7 to 25 gpm. The geologic conditions responsible for the ground water in this area is as follows: T'ne area is underlain by the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Formation. This formation is comprised of a series of interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale horizons. The water encountered in the drilled wells is supplied from the sandstone horizons, which are relatively porous and permeable. The recharge area, (location of water input into the formation), is probably along the southeasterly extension of the formation outcrop which forms that part of the Grand Hogback extending from the Marble area to Silt. Additional recharge is prob- ably contributed to the formation in the outcrop areas on the south- east rim of the Grand Mesa. As is the case with the majority of western slope aquifers, this aquifer has not been subjected to de- tailed hydrological investigation because the impact of water extrac- tion has been so slight in comparison to the extent of the formation and potential recharge volume. In the vicinity of the Asgard Subdivision, the sedimentary beds dip southerly. The dip angle varies from a few degrees near Silt to nearly 45° on the Hogback. The individual wells are not all draw- ing water from the same sandstone horizon but are tapping several distinct sandstone beds and in some cases are drawing water from the alluvial fan overlaying the Mesaverde suboutcrop. While this alluvial fan is undoubtedly receiving some recharge from surface water in the immediate vicinity, the majority of the recharge is derived from the underlaying Mesaverde Formation. In conclusion, it is my opinion that considering the geology of the area, that this area will support a substantial number of low pro- duction (10 to 25 gpm) domestic wells without resulting in a signi- ficant water table drawdown. Respectfully, Jerome F. Gamba, eZ & LS 5933 7 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELDORADO ENGINEERING COMPANY 303-945-6917 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 P. O. BOX 669 803 COLORADO AVENUE • • WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR ASGARD SUBDIVISION- THIRD FILING Date of Report 4/18/72 It is proposed that Asgard Subdivision - Third Filing be served by individual wells. Proof of available water for such wells is available from two sources. The first source is a test well drilled by the owner, a copy of the results submitted herewith. The second source is the history and characteristics of existing wells in the immediate vicinity of the subdivision. The test well was drilled in the spring of 1971. Potable water was found at an elevation approximately 200 feet below existing ground line. The well was tested for capacity and found to be 15 gallons per minute. This would be equivalent to 21,600 gallons per day, which would be more than adequate to serve a domestic dwelling as is planned for the lots in this subdivision. As further substantiation of available sub -surface water, it is noted that there are several domestic wells in vicinity of this subdivision. These wells have a production rate of 5 to 10 gallons per minute, and most of them have been in long time usage. From studies of the depths of each well, it is apparent that the aquifer is nearly horizontal and probably in the unconsolidated gravel and boulder horizon,which can be observed in places along the boundary of this subdivision. In as much as there has been a favorable past production of domestic water, it is reasonable to assume that such should continue to be true. Respectfully, Voyir Roger Hocking PE & LS 10049 • • • 9711. • - N \. Scale: •-'/' Bedrock outcrop or thin bouldry residual soil over bedrock. Potential major flood way. Thick to thin pediment sediments. 1" = 400' A Exposures logged ■ Test Pits T Dip and strike of bedrock. w ; f 0 4 —Z -- E 1/4 corn. Seco 26 R92W, T55 SURF ICIAL GEOLOGY Fig 14 • • 9711 ' \ • •:a.1,`„ i .,• 1,-- ,,, / AI • ,, '.., ir i ' '' ' ir ILfoTh. i \•:-.0r,,,' -,. . ,D1• • ' \ I Nt Sca1a:' •••„,;•••' 416 41/111p. %Two, I I 1" = 400' A Exposures logged • Test Pits, Greater than 50% Between 30% and 50% Less than 30% - E 1/4 corn. Sec. 26 R92W, T55 , j Ity • • r (16 -1 SLOPE MAP Fig. 3 DEPTH - FEET • NOM 0 5 — 10 Test Pit 1 Test Pit 2 /'— WC=12.1 DD=105.7 -200=61 we=8.1 -200=45 J • /. r/ WC=7.8 LL=29.o / P1=13.1 -200=84 // • Test Pit 3 Test Pi; WC=12.8 DD=86.0 WC=5.6 DD=125.2 7 r � /fl we=6.c DD=1 01 .6 fr.; ! LL=24.0 PI=12.5 -200=43 Test Pit 5 Test Pit 6 WC=10.0 DD=107.7 — 15 LEGEND: ( t Sand (SC), clayey to Clay (CL), sandy, medium dense to stiff, brown, moist. Weathered claystone, stiff, grey, moist. Sandstone bedrock, hard to very hard, indurated and jointed, yellcw-brown, moist. 1111 Claystone bedrock, hard, highly jointed, weakly cemented, grey to brown, moist. #9711 Indicates location of hand sample. A NOTES: Exposure 1 WC=11.2 DD=98.8 Exposure 2 Exposure 3 WC=12.8 DD=101.4 LL=32.9 PI=31.5 • wC=14.3 DD=113.9 62 r2 z A/ / (1) Test pits were dug June 7, 1973 with a backhoe. (2) No free water was found in the test pits at the time of this investigation. (3) Location of test pits and exposures shown on Fig. 2 are approximately to scale. (4) WC = Water Content (%); DD = Dry Density (pcf); LL = Liquid Limit (%); PI = Plasticity Index (%); -200 = Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve. 0 5 10 15 LOGS OF TEST PITS AND EXPOSURES Fig. 5 DEPTH - FEET • • ci 4 Compression - 11.2 • . 4 -Additional compression under constant pressure due to wetting. Sample ofvery sandy clay from .Exposure 1 at depth 6' 101.4 Y.,! 12.4 Expansion under constant pressure upon wetting. • Sample of claystone from Exposure 1 at 12' 9711 • • Compression 0 1 2 3 14 11 3. 9 114.3 k - —Additional compression under,con5tagt pressure due to wetting. 1 , , k • ' Sampleof claystone from Exposure 2 at surface. 125.2 r. 5.6 Expansion under constant presuru i r . ; 4 -8 , 1 upon wetting. 1111 Sample of claystone from Test Pit 3 at depth 7' 9711 Fig. 7 • c 0 V) v E 0 L) • • 9711 107.7 10.0 1 5 Additional compression under cons.t4intil pressure due to wetting: - &ample of very sandy clay from Test Pit 5 at depth ro 1 C1 :f► ,tw CHEN AND ASSOCIATES TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS NATURALN.4TURALORYIATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED TEST PITS DEPTH MO; STU RE DENSIT" LOU, 0 IP. ASTICITr r'DMPRESSIVE. AND ( FEET) o yIr I INDEX LSTRENGTH EXPOSURES °i�i _1._1°/01 (P F) iTest Pit 1 4.0 i 12.1 r 105.7 T -- . 9.0 3.1 Test PIt 2 6.o 7 829.0 18.1 84 Sandy Clay 4 -T- JOB NO. •1 1 TRIAX AL SHF AR TESTs4 PERCENT DEVIATOR TCONFININ3 PASSING STRESS PRESSURE NO. 200 (P SF) ! PSF) SIEVE SOIL TYPE 61 Sandy Clay 45 nd Test Pit3- 3.5 12.8 86.0 Clayey Sand 7.0 5.6 12_5.2 Claystone Bedrock -f Test Pit 4: 8.0 6.0 101.6 24.0 - 12.5 43 Clayey Sand _ I !Test Pit 51 3.5 10.0 107.7 Sandy Clay i !Exposure 1 6.0 11.2 98.8 Very Sandy Clay 12.0 12.8 + 101.4 32.9 31.5 Claystone Bedrock 0 1 Exposure 2i Surface 14.3 113.9 Claystone Bedrock -J • • Roads Good motor STANDARD MAP SYMBOLS UNITED STATES DEPARB1ENT OF AGR1CULTURE Soil Conservation Service COLORADO Rock outcrop ✓ ✓V ✓J Fence —x—x— Poor motor or private O; b Gravel o e as Trail Chert fragoaents pt,... Railroads + 1 I Clay spot X' Buildings es el Bedrock escarpment -pp--q r 7 77 School E1 Gumbo or scabby spot 0 Church Li Sand spot Gravel pit, open mine, or quarry Gully Vvutr$-- Farm, ranch, or other Made land operations boundary Blowout Field or land use boundary Lake or Pond Land capability, range, or Permanent Water woodland site boundary �4''` - Intermittent Water Range condition boundary Range condition PC, GC, PC, PC Farmstead H Field number O Field acreage 320 Ac. Special purpose plantings (label) Tent site Trailer site Picnic shelter Small recreation area (label as to type) USSAsC$ PO TLAW. cr:o. .. M-4206 [TENNIS' ;") Wet spot or Pot Hole Marsh area or Spot Spring Dam and reservoir Stock pond, tank or charco Spring development Spring and trough Trough Well (label) Windmill lJ \I/ Closed or tile drain —0- 0 side of ditch, etc. Shelterbelt M x tt Stream bank protection Dike or levee -f'rl i rI F Pipeline ►—�f tr--� Flume or syphon ( CANAL CANAL Canal (label) /1L CA„AL Irrigation ditch Pickup ditch —P —P Diversion Drainage Ditch (open drain) .� Ilam Terrace Vegetative waterway lx—+=__•'=- Division box or turnout.. '�Iy Diversion or spreader r dam � Check dam or gully plug t/ , Drop structure PROTECTIOE COVENANTS FOR ASGARD SIPIVISION, THIRD FILING, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO CHARLES J. BECKER, as the fee owner of Asgard Subdivision, Third Filing, desiring to insure the development and continuity thereof as a rural residential area, hereby delcares to and for the benefit of all persons who may hereafter purchase and from time to time own lots in Asgard Subdivision, Third Filing, that the owner- ship or holding of said lots shall be subject -to the following pro- tective covenants and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to be appurtenant to and run with the land. 1. SCOPE. The covenants, conditions and restrictions herein contained shall apply. to the whole of Asgard Subdivision, Third Filing, as the same appears on plat recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, as Document .No. 2. LAND USE. The rroperty is intended to be developed for single family residential and agricultural purposes only. No more than one detached single family dwelling shall be placed upon any one building site, excepting such appropriate accessory buildings as a guest house, private garage, barn -.nd utility building. Ac- cessory buildings shall blend with and compliment the general prchi- tecturn.1 scheme and design of the family dwelling. No building or structure intended for or adapted to busine s, commercial or manu- facturing purposes, nor any multiple family dwelling shall be erected, placed, maintained or permitted upon such property. 3. RE -SUBDIVISION. No lot shall ever be resubdivided .into smaller lots or tracts, nor be conveyed or encumbered in any size.less than the full original dimension. 4. SET -BACK RESTRICTION. The principal building placed on each lot shall be located no nearer than 25 feet to any lot line. 5. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES. No structure of a tei .porary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn, or any other out -buildings of any description shall be used on any lot as a residence, except on a temporary basis, not exceeding 12 months while construction of the dwelling is in process. All construction shall be completed within 12 months from date of commencement of construction. 6 . . NO COM_-IERCIAL USE. There shall not be permitted or maintained upon any lot or any part thereof any trade, business or industry except that owners may rent or lease for residential pur- poses when not required for the owners` use. 7. STRUCTURES. No structure shall be placed upon any lot which is, or ever has been, or could be made the subject of a specific ownership tax as now defined in Chapter 13 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, 1963. 8. Ml J4UM HOUSE SIZE. The minim living area size of any house, shall not be less than 800 square feet measured on the outside walls, exclusive of open porches, garages, or car -ports. 9. SEWAGE DISPOSAL. Each residence shall contain one fully equipped bathroom and all sewage shall be disposed of by means of a septic tank and leaching field of such types and specifications as shall be approved by the Colorado State Department of Health. 10. ANIMALS. The keeping of animals shall be allowed provided that said animals are well kept and provided for and do not become a health hazard or nuisance to the neighborhood and are fenced and do not run at large. 11. OFFENSIVE CONDUCT. No noxious or offensive conduct or activities shall be carried on upon any lot or in any structure thereon which may constitute a health hazard, nuisance or annoyance to the neighborhood... All lots shall be kept clean and free of rub- bish and trash and the structures thereon shall be kept in good repair. Parking of old automobiles other than those in running condition and currently licensed shall be prohibited. 12. VARIANCES. The Board of Adjustment may grant a reason- able variance or adjustment of these conditions and restrictions in order to overcome practical difficulties and prevent unnecessary hardships arising by reason of the application of the covenants and restrictions contained herein. Such variances or adjustments shall be granted in case the granting thereof shall not be materially detrimental or injurous to other property or improvements of the neighborhood and shall not defeat the general intent and purpose of these protective covenants. (a) The Board of Adjustment shall consist of Charles J. Becker, Patricia J. Becker and , or three other members appointed by them, s•;hich members shall be owners of lots in Asgard Subdivision, Third Filing. (b) Applications for variances shall be in writing, spelling out in detail the variance requested. Action of the Board of Adjustment shall be made within•. 30 days and their decision shall be final and conclusive. Failure to act with- in said 30 day period shall be deemed a denial of the variance request. 13. PERIOD OF COVENANTS. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties and all persons claiming under them until January 1, 1993. Thereafter said covenants shall automatically be exkended for successive periods of five years unless the majority of th'e then owners of the lots in the subdivision vote to change the same in whole or in part. All such changes shall be evidenced by a written document setting forth such changes, shall be signed by a majority of such lot owners and shall be recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. 14. V ,ATIONS. •If any lot owner persons acting by, through or under hi_m shall violate or attempt to violate any of the covenants herein stated, it shall be lawful for other persons owning lots in said subdivision to prosecute any suit in law or in equity to restrain and enjoin the violation of such covenants and to recover damages for such violation and to recover all costs and attorney fees necessary to enforce the provisions of these covenants. 15. INVALIDATION. The invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in nowise affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. Dates this day of , 1973. CHARLES J. DECKER C0-1+2 (Rev. 2) • • • August, 1967 CONSERVATION PLAN MAP and SOIL AND CAPABILITY MAP LEGEND SHEET UNITED STAThS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service Colorado Different kinds of soil, range sites, or woodland sites are separatedon the map by solid black lines. Within each area is an identifying symbol or name. The following symbold are shown on your map: Symbol or Site Name Generalized Descriptions (Detailed descriptions are available in your Soil Conservation Service office.) X21 -F Shallow loam or stony loam, underlain from 5 to 20 inches by sandstone or shale. Sheds water and erodes rapidly. Usually on steep bream. Droughty. Slope ranges from 25 to 65%* 38-C Deep brown clay loam soil. Takes water slowly. Compacts if worked or grazed while wet. Hard to till. 3 to 6% slope. 38-D Like above with 6 to 12% slopes. X38 -D Mixture of deep brown clay loam soil and a stony subsoil type. Both soils have slow water intake rates. High runoff rate. Compacts if tilled or grazed while wet. 6 to 12% slope. 50a -D Deep brown loam soil. Takes and holds water moderately well. Tills easily. 6 to 12% slope. 50E -D Simular to above but subject to flooding. Large rocks present due to past flooding* X50 --D Mixture of soil 50 and a loamy stone filled type. Has moderate water intake rata and holding capacity. Stony spots interfere with tillage. 6 to 12% slope. X64 Shallow brown very stony soil. Moderate water intake rate. Moderate to low holding capacity. Washes and gullies easily. Underlain from 5 to 20 inches by sandstone or shale. Occurs on steep slopes. Droughty. Slopes 25 to 65%* X64 -G Similar to above but with slopes over 65%* X65 -F Mixture of brown shallow and very shallow stony shaly soils, underlain from 5 to 2.0 inches by shale. Ve ry low water intake rate and holding capacity. W shes and gullies easily. High runoff factor* Droughty. 25 to 65% slopes. Becker - 2 • 71-0 Deep brown silt loam soil. Clay loam subsoil„ Moderate water intake rate and good holding capacity. Silt pan may form if tilled while wet. Blows easily if cover is poor. Slope is from 3 to 6%. 71-D Similar to above but with slopes of 6 to 125. 109 -EE • Shallow moderately stony loam. *° s soil underlain from 10 to 20 0' inches by strongly calcareous stony material of mixed origin mainly of sandstone and quartz. Has moderately low water holding capacity and intake rate. Organic matter contefrt is moderately low. High lime content ties up nutrients and causes chlorosis. 12 to 25slopes. WOODLAND SITE Pinyon -Juniper - The pinyon -juniper site is the transition between the grassland and montane forests. At this elevation it consists of almost a pure stand of Utah Juniper. Only a few: scattered pinyons exist on this unit. Understory consists of Indian Picegrass, galleta, cheatgrasa, and three -awn. Shrubs include rabbitbrash and snakeweed. Soils are shallow, rocky, and droughty. Tho site is now in poor condition p`oducing only about 100 pounda of air dry forage per year. This site has some value for harvest of fence posts and fire wood. It is valuable for habitat for deer. Management for this unit should be based on the adjoining dry pastures. • • • CO -42 CAPABILITY GROUPS OF SOILS Capability classification is the grouping of soils to show, in. a general way, their suitability for most kinds of farming,- It is a practical classification based on limitations of the soils, the risk of damage when they are used, and the way they respond to treatment. The soils are classified according to degree and kind of permanent limitation, but without consideration of major and generally expensive landforming that would change the slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils; and without consideration of possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. -_ Roman numerals are used'to show the 8 broad Capability Classes and letters follow the class numeral to indicate the principal problem or hazard. Classes and sub -classes used are as follows: Class I - Few or no limitations that restrict choice of crops or require conservation measures. Class II - Some limitations that reduce the choice of crops or require moderate conservation measures.' Class III - Severe limitations that reduce choice of crops or require special conservat.ion'practices or both. Class IV - Very severe, limitations that restrict the choice of crops, require very careful management, or both. Class V - Not suited for cultivation but has few or nd hazards when used for pasture, range, woodland or wildlife. Class VI - Not suited for cultivation, Severe limitations. Suited for range, pasture, woodland or wildlife with careful management and needed conservation practices. Class VII - Not suited for cultivation. Very severe limitations. Suited for range, woodland or wildlife uses if darefully managed. Usually cannot'apply physical practices such as pitting, furrowing, seeding, etc. Class VIII - Not suited for cultivation, range, pasture or woodland. Suited only for recreation, wildlife, water supply or esthetic purposes. e - Erosion by wind w - s - c -- is or the major problem. Excessive water such as wetness, overflow, or high water table. Major problem is in the soil. It may be too shallow, too heavy, stony, low in fertility, salty, alkaline or have low moisture capacity. Climate is the major hazard. Growing season may be very short, there is a shortage of rainfall or both. water Examples: IIIe - Class III land where erosion is the major hazard. IVc - Class IV land where the climate is the major problem. . • . hy UM'ED STATES DEPARTMENT of AGR!CULTURE * attl. COVATION SERV!CE cooperating with • ..s..1•L•••1,1 0,t 1:."4 %V sramr,2, stusgzo., , 00 /,„t- 04414,4 /OW 04..4°,°1 Cv04LItat INC 47 04°. 9°./RYCY OwNER CA"..4c-ie FArlm No. . . DATE - 70 OPERATOR 777/ii.n." SCALE A -://p / ACRES „ 0 ASPI10% 1 b. C.O." PHOTO NO. 2..)X4/-2-4/ NIMMOI.P.Malmo•PAM20•004:1202:412=41•1100.17.0•M=.11.•....J \ '" • . • • 4. ‘•; • A A, ,.)..., t--, .. '‘, \ •\. ,„•: - 1•`,.....\ ‘s-- ,4,4•'.1'. \'f/i.,.....,\...,,.. .N. .v ,z,.`\ \ ,i' . „ ,,4 \ 4' ,... s .;., .,.. ,,,4.4004041.44...e• ....,L.AR. ,... ....,...10,..416..,,.......t.,Uas ....V.« - ..- \ It • ; 1 -f.54,-;\.•• 71-9 ' • 1 1. \ • • • ."4 f" • r • I • 4,4 4. 4 • r V, ‘,* ' "447,4 '• 140 .7 •4 !Th • ;4. . • • , • i ( • • • 2 -1 -Le_ • - .•;;'?•,\ . • • , • ; '. C. r Il I, ) ... ..., :-...!.....•.?'4.-,,.,.,. \••••,.• : • ..., . i N i LI - : '. '''.!1..r.•;... •-*•-••`.., x) ,,, • I , I .i. f are / -N.\. \-'- '' \.--1 ' \ . ! , i i& 1 i 147 I ' \ \ 1/4•..1„. . •,.... \-____77-7.-......„....._)\,,,, • , 1/4,, •-- ''''.4-s' — , •., ,.........7 -, k - 1,, p i 7/ — 6.' 1 ' 4:0 i\ . 4 •S' t - i 1 (-• ? .4 1I. : • : 1 I Ai' \ 1.,„•) '\7/c, ,• 47 • F. 7.4 1, 4. 1- 71-C :,••1 e• V • ; , s• • _ • • ,„ rra.v• . . t 44 , . 4 ,,t1 --' . .-',..... .-. .. T , t k .,,..„,......... ..– ,. :7i.c-3 •- C . , .„ .,... i , .. 4 , i ,.. t f ,17 ! •.- 1 ; , „,,,, .g 4' ,', , , .4 ° 4 ' 1° 4 7) 1 . \. , - < \ ) ;':: , 1-r. , 1 - 3 474'\44 • • I A /' ' .1 1/4 1 / 3 C 4 • ).k L.. / '• Vib-C\ L.. NA ' ••••• L i• /.47/7 ' • • • r e, ,1•••• , 1 , • tt- 0 it •7; \ frN , ..rt I ef,1,1. • . • zt. °•°;,b • c fltT4_7, • . .11. t rit4 ° •••••!•/ 'a 7 (P • •• •• I / • - ) j\*I C. 5 • „ - p.; P • -- - J•K 1; 11 , \'4 D ; ii• --P1 /41/ -.. r- • r • 30 bbany •--•••••• '4.01 &win. Roads Good motor STANDARD MAP SYMBOLS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service COLORADO Rock outcrop ✓ ✓v, ✓✓ Fence —x—x— Poor motor or private ' ° Go> ravel 1$AIL _ 44 Trail Chert fragments - P74 Railroads Clay spot x Buildings © mi Bedrock escarpmentvv.-TTqrcrv4• School Gumbo or scabby spot 0 Church III Sand spot Gravel pit, open mine, or quarry V Gully Farm, ranch, or other Made land operations boundary Blowout Field or land use boundary -- — — — — Lake or Pond Land capability, range, or.r Permanent Water woodland site boundary Intermittent Water Range condition boundary Range condition EC, GC, FC, PC Farmstead Field number H 0 Field acreage 320 Ac. WILDU$E Special purpose plantings r? (label) S Tent site Trailer. site Picnic shelter Small recreation area .... (label as to type) ufoA ecs•raAn .. ewao. , ns M-4206 TENNIS Wet spot or Pot Hole Marsh area or Spot Spring Dam and reservoir Stock pond, tank or charco Spring development Spring and trough Trough Well (label) Windmill L.l \1/ 0 vrb. O >— 'Q Niarral WELL 0 side of ditch, etc. Shelterbelt M A A Stream hank protection.. saa A Dike or laves. 44+444+4 Pipeline F—SHF-+ Flume or syphon r > > ) CAA'AL -0 Canal (label) CANAL Irrigation ditch Pickup ditch/'— Diversion Drainage Ditch Ditch (open drain) Closed or tile drain 0 r 0 Terrace Vegetative t---r— Vegetative waterway -a—� _• • •' Division box or turnout-y Diversion or spreader dam Check dam or gully plug Drop structure DEED OF DEDICATION WHEREAS, BOB BAGLEY, PAUL BAGLEY, CHARLEEN L. BAGLEY, FERN BAGLEY, CHARLES J. BECKER, MARVIN D. ELLER and SHARON L. ELLER, caused to be filed in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, on the 23rd day of June, 1971, a plat entitled "ASGARD SUBDIVISION, FIRST FILING", Document No. 250130 in Plat Book 3 at Page 76, and WHEREAS, subsequent developments have dictated that there be constructed along the Northerly boundary of Lot 1 of said subdivision a roadway to be used for ingress and egress to properties continguous to said subdivision, and WHEREAS, Charles J. Becker, being the owner of said Lot 1 and of the contiguous properties which could be serviced by said roadway, desires to dedicate the same to the County of Garfield and State of Colorado, and WHEREAS, all parties who own real property or a security interest therein, approved said dedication as is evidenced by the signature of each appended to the within deed of dedication. NOW, THEREFORE, Charles J. Becker hereby sells and quitclaims to the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, the following described real property located in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado, which grant is made for roadway, utility and water drainage purposes, to -wit: A road right-of-way in Lot No. 1, Asgard Subdivision, Filing No. 1, Sections 26 and 35, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly right-of-way of Odin Drive whence the NE corner of said Lot 1 bears N. 00°59'24" W. 32.31 feet; thence N. 69°11'11" W. 168.72 feet; thence N. 79°50'32" W. 197.54 feet; thence S. 83°16'45" W. 88.51 feet; thence N. 36°40'02" W. 70.08 feet; thence N. 65°30'18" W. 82.30 feet; thence S. 24°16'31" W. 65.98 feet; thence S. 75°30'00" E. 5.17 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having an interior angle of 38°49'58" and a radius of 111.91 feet; thence S. 36°40'02" E. 0.90 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the left having an interior angle of 60°03'13" and a radius of 130.00 feat; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having an interior angle of 16°52'43" and a radius of 509.27 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having an interior angle of 10°39'21" and a radius of 805.42 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having an interior angle of 68°11'47" and a radius of 165.45 feet; thence N. 00°59'24" W. 176.63 feet along the Westerly right-of-way of Odin Drive to the point of beginning, containing .956 acres, more or less, as more particularly appears on plat thereof prepared by Eldorado Engineering. Company dated December 20, 1972, and attached hereto as Exhibits A-1 and A-2. CHARLES J. BECKER O ..y • \ \ 1 's.) z\\ 1.,.)s ` _. 1 G,, \ I ` `\:' { S1 _ `, t.➢ 5 - 1» C\ . it l.) - . \I 1til -P' ) ►l1 ) • ti _ Y. (i { '� ‘.S f 1 11 VI, ) )-1. - {c,-..;'` S' -1 y - 11 I i i IVC, IP L‘--'{U� "1 - (.i �_ Ii. trill o Z0 , .. .. 'f) )-, i' > Y Gr. _ 1 —. ,, c. :; f— ,} ti t, ! --1 !,•,, ` ,) { -- T \}, ,,', ,! ! t , j� t� ' 1,-- t>• C_ • _li • : t. �t -6 j u t - • '� p �I (i' t 0 i — t : i,` • 111 \ (% ' •`y. 0 a 041 I, r c•••••--' r r1 , ,:.•,' G ••ter •.l I> .. - r C� 4• - r' 1 0.1- Iv . -1 Z 4\. l}) r4 i o p ► U V.. r " u , __, 0._ _,_, ., 1,:,? _' - r.)fn �' 'r t•_ `, (P ii?;: ;' EXHIBIT A -l. Attached and forming part ii 1`r -rt,, of Deed of Dedication from Charles J. p' / '� ,T,Becker to the Board of County Commissioners L ,' of the County of Garfield, State of .► 0 �f Colorado. 1) ?- ji -,. -J .. i- ! ,R E rl� NN • n r3 L.or- i \ IV / -- Z EXHIBIT A-2. Attached and forming \ a • part of Deed of Dedication from Charles \\ N---" J. Becher to the Board of County v Commissioners of the County of \\ Garfield, State of Colorado. \ \ nN3AV 00`7d0100 £09 Oat/80013 ONi2:133NION3 000MN319 DN I1.irSNOO ('TZ i�► b q)• 10,E • 0 0,,�1 0',j 1p C H •- r, r r1 i✓ rr F• 0 (..r) r r -•r C CC •-3 •1 . r1 1 r y ri :a...• )•-• tJ C. rt S '1 i T r; r • U .r- r7 -. ;D :l r) .1 r� �• ry C !' �J o r. .• O ., i. -' r :j. C •-• :) r-•• r' V r•• cr r rt r •••% C 0",� �• ,7._ 1..... 1-• r4 0 ^l r C C.: rt -' .1 - :.:', r V: :3 '1 • :r. r: r <. U+ . _': •,. 7 r ,•• 'I: r r--. w r to G n 0 r-1 17.1 r • C) .1 < • • r o ;-) rt 01 n :1 r r) ,....0C) r--• Cr % 4:: -CG r4 0 1 r.; H. •1 0 • • 0 O lL O n •-• }.,. Kr I.: ^ r :! r* r •-1 s '1,4 -)r r. 0 r- r+, L) -7 .7 `.0 r • :n F •- • r: : 7 1. r„. r, '•. r7, '-Jl r n I' •r 1-1-. '� r y. ., r;C - - • -r~" r-- 'J. - r.; , - =i 0 .-• .-. v y n• C7 t) •,-. r) { n, rt C') v L "J. 5 0 r- xr w r� r ..) t ( . ;a �- - r ..:� r •.o I • j rh•,• rrR o 7 t„ r • •o :1 -. _ __ 3K. F-• r •_ tr. - : - O . 0 0 '1 �.1 1-�•1 C. i[1rH I. 0 0 v r7 4-1 : r - - r- '-• • L.) r) G, • 1 r:; lir - r : ••n r •-, _ 7: -..- vs,...... -. r' - -• .:. r U r) ., rt r_'s • p •-.) r, rp 71 r-• !. r : 7 J ,c •i L.1 C ^ •-1 r1 Q: N 71 71 r -:- 1 - r. 1 r; .4 — Ci r .-• 0 -:.•T C. C c L-, ti.. -r :s ,.D .•, - ..- PI v7 /: .11• f r. - -7 7.yr n ••1 { .... :.•. r rte, 4, r. •-• 9 ^ rJ :3 4. .r. 0-, r, c-. r•: :•) r) rr: , -• rA : s r- r� ' 5 — :i • 0 0 r' • •qY „R. 3 r+ rO , .^• -rtr. ti ....I lr) •--, CI: ':, wn..•r'wa.ac �: ;✓. a. 'r :. - •• -•i r . _).' ).t :•: ti " 1" n 2' F •J '1) r•. 1--• ;3 .r..� 1 rt c - r •1 *t r. r„ i•-• -: :.A rT . .• .• + fi t-• a. t- .. or- •t n s -1 • ,..: t. FJ r- r r ',L r:• - ... .� 7. r r -{. •1 . A r .771 Lr r* t-) �• 7.:-;-• 't 1. r1 - ,r i.: is ,l) r _ 7. it C•: r1 'r). F., 7 - •- u (.. .. • •••!•••• .1 r... r _.. I..• . -•, l.. ... r•i - L.• }: -� Ir, rC' ,... • zv .) r.• • r •1 :1.M 4-*"... • 3 Ch v CI. •-1 LJl ,... I'. 'n :� r•• :3- ..n. r'. r- �. .•• •�, ;'v .) - IN. -, . r.. r • rt .7 CI. 'r r-. r, : - o ,, r* r. r r 1 - , +� :J ).).. rr Y. ^ ry It,. C.\ -1 ,: •• ^1 f• rt 1. ;3 C. 0 • Qs 'Ar r. r, i.l r-, '.1 ,- r' : 3 F) 1. ' r, ... "J ....a 71 r• .1 . 1 .. r) 1 >; ...J It • • STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged , 1973, by before me this day of CHARLES J. BECKER. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC The undersigned, being all of the owners and holders of security interests in Asgard Subdivision, First Filing, hereby ratify and approve the above conveyance and do further agree that the signature pages of duplicate originals hereof shall, when affixed hereto, constitute one document for recording purposes. STATE OF COUNTY OF ss. D. E. DUNSON The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by D. E. DUNSON. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC • • STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD RONALD L. DIEMOZ SALLY J. DIEMOZ OLIVER DIEMOZ MARIAN E. DIEMOZ The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by RONALD L. DIEMOZ, SALLY J. DIEMOZ, OLIVER DIEMOZ and MARIAN E. DIEMOZ. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COUNTY OF • • SS. CHARLES E. EDDY MARSHA DiANN EDDY The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by CHARLES E. EDDY and MARSHA DiANN EDDY. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COUNTY OF • • SS. RONALD R. JOHNSON JANYCE H. JOHNSON The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by RONALD R. JOHNSON and JANYCE H. JOHNSON. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC MAJESTIC SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION By STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by and of MAJESTIC SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC • • DONALD C. WALLER JUDY M. WALLER STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by DONALD C. WALLER and JUDY M. WALLER. My commission expires: STATE OF COUNTY OF WITNESS my hand and official seal. ss. NOTARY PUBLIC ROBERT L. MEISNER LOIS I. MEISNER The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by ROBERT L. MEISNER and LOIS I. MEISNER. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COUNTY OF • • Ss. GORDON R. SMALE FREDA A. SMALE The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by GORDON R. SMALE and FREDA A. SHALE. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COUNTY OF ss. NOTARY PUBLIC RICHARD G. BRADLEY CHARLENE V. BRADLEY The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by RCHARD G. BRADLEY and CHARLENE V. BRADLEY. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COUNTY OF • • ss. PAUL J. WOLF VIVIAN A. WOLF The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by PAUL J. WOLF and VIVIAN A. WOLF. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COUNTY OF ss. NOTARY PUBLIC GARY L. PALMER NANCY S. PALMER The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by GARY L. PALMER and NANCY S. PALMER. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COUNTY OF • • ss. DOROTHY F. SMITH The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged day of , 1973, by before me this DOROTHY F. SMITH. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COUNTY OF NOTARY PUBLIC DONALD LEE WARD ss. JANICE D. WARD The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by DONALD LEE WARD and JANICE D. WARD. STATE OF COUNTY OF My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC JACK LANNING ) ss. EMMA LOUISE LANNING The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by JACK LANNIN.G and EMMA LOUISE LANNING. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC • • EVA M. ZASTROW STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by EVA M. ZASTROW. My commission expires: STATE OF COUNTY OF WITNESS my hand and official seal. ss. NOTARY PUBLIC ALBERT E. WILKERSON LINA A. WILKERSON The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by ALBERT E. WILKERSON and LINA A. WILKERSON. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC a • NORMAN B. MOSELEY SHIRLEY A. MOSELEY STATE OF ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing Deed of Dedication was acknowledged before me this day of , 1973, by NORMAN B. MOSELEY and SHIRLEY A. MOSELEY. My commission expires: WITNESS my hand and official seal NOTARY PUBLIC C0-'42 (Rev. 2) • CONSERVATION PLAN MAP and SOIL AND CAPABILITY MAP LEGEND SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service Colorado Different kinds of map by solid black name. The followin Symbol or Site Name • August, 1967 soil, range sites, or woodland sites are separated.on the lines. Within each area is an identifying symbol or g symbold are shown on your map: Generalized Descriptions (Detailed descriptions are available in your Soil Conservation Service office.) X21 -F Shallow loam or stony loam, underlain from. 5 to 20 inches by sandstone or shale. Sheds water and erodes rapidly. Usually on steep breaks. Droughty. Slope ranges from 25 to 65%. 38-C Deep brown clay loam soil. Takes water slowly. Compacts if worked or grazed while wet. Hard to till. 3 to 6% slope. 38-0 Like above with 6 to 12% slopes. X38 -D Mixture of deep brown clay loam soil and Both soils have slow water intake rates. Compacts if tilled or grazed while wet. a stony subsoil type. High runoff rate. 6 to 12% slope. • 50-D Deep brown loam soil. Takes and holds water moderately well. Tills easily. 6 to 12% slope. 50E -,D Simular to above but subject to flooding. Large rocks present due to past flooding. X50 --D Mixture of soil 50 and a loamy stone filled type. Has moderate water intake rata and holding capacity. Stony spots intorfere with tillage. 6 to 12% slops. X6? -F Shallow brown very stony soil. Moderate water intake rate. Moderate to low holding capacity. Washes and gullies easily. Underlain from 5 to 20 inches by sandstone or shale. Occurs on steep slopes. Droughty. Slopes 25 to 65%. X64-6 Similar to above but with slopes over 65%. X65 -F Mixture of brown shallow and very shallow stony shaly soils, underlain from 5 to 2:0 inches by shale. Ve ry low water intake rate and holding capacity. Washes and gullies easily. High runoff factor. Droughty. 25 to 655 slopes. • • CO -42 CAPABILITY GROUPS OF SOILS Capability classification is the grouping of soils to show, in.a general way, their suitability for most kinds of farming. It is a practical classification based on limitations of the soils, the risk of damage when they are used, and the way they respond to treatment. The soils are classified according to degree and kind of permanent limitation, but without consideration of major and generally expensive landforming that would change the slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils; and without consideration of possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Roman numerals are used.to show the 3 broad Capability Classes and letters follow the class numeral to indicate the principal problem or hazard. Classes and sub -classes used are as follows: Class I - Few or no limitations that restrict choice of crops or require conservation measures. Class II - Some limitations that reduce the choice of crops or require moderate conservation measures.' Class III - Severe limitations. that reduce choice of crops or require special conservation'practices or both. Class IV - Very severe limitations that restrict the choice of crops, require very careful management, or both. • .1 Class V - Not suited for cultivation but has few or no' hazards when used for pasture, range, woodland or wildlife. Class VI - Not suited for cultivation. Severe limitations. Suited for range, pasture, woodland or wildlife with careful management and needed conservation practices. Class VII - Not suited for cultivation. Very` severe limitations. Suited fin - range, woodland or wildlife uses if carefully managed. Usually cannot'apply physihal practices such as pitting, furrowing, seeding, etc. Class VIII - Not suited for cultivation, range, pasture or woodland. Suited only for recreation, wildlife, water supply or esthetic purposes. e - Erosion by wind or water is the major problem. w - Excessive water such as wetness, overflow, or high water table. s - Major problem is in the soil. It may be too shallow, too heavy, stony, low in fertility, salty, alkaline or have low moisture capacity. c - Climate is the major hazard. Growing season may be very short, there is a shortage of rainfall or both. Examples: IIIe - Class III land where erosion is the major hazard. IVc - Class IV land where the climate is the major problem. • • Becker - 2 71-C Deep brown silt loam soil. Clay loam subsoil, Moderate water intake rate and good holding capacity. Silt pan may form if tilled while wet. Blows easily if cover is poor. Slope is from 3 to 6%. 71,D Similar to above but with slopes of 6 to 12%. 109E Shallow moderately stony loans ? ; soil underlain from 10 to 20 =a inches by strongly calcareous stony material of mixed origin mainly of sandstone and quartz. Has moderately low water holding capacity and intake rate. Organic matter conteirt is moderately low. High lime content ties up nutrients and causes chlorosis. 12 to 25% slopes. WOODLAND SITE Pinyon -Juniper - The pinyon -juniper site is the transition between the grassland and montane forests. At this elevation it consists of almost a pure stand of Utah Juniper. Only a few. scattered pinyons exist on this unit. Understory consists of Indian Ricegrass, galleta, cheatgrasa, and three -awn. Shrubs include rabbitbrush and snaksweed. Soils are shallow, rocky, and droughty. The site is now in poor condition ptoducing only about 100 pound of air dry forage per year. This site has some value for harvest of fence posts and fire wood. It is valuable for habitat for deer. Management for this unit should be based on the adjoining dry pastures. WELL LO From ' To w Type & Color of Material Water Loc. e Use additional paper if necessary to complete log. State of Colorado, County of Subscribed and sworn to before me this My Commission cxpirC3 Jul, 26, 1y7A ss • WELL DATA Type Drilling HOLE DIAffiETER: in. from ft. to ft. in from ft. to ft. in. from ft. to ft. CASING RECORD Plain Casing Size=, kind/' J`' from ft. to ft. Size_, kind from ft. to ft. Size_, kind from ft. to ft Perforated Casing Size_ kind''' from ft. to 'r`)"ft Size—, kind fro Size_, kind ft to ft from ft to ft GROUTING RECORD Materia l'� "� Intervals Placement Method '-"'' `-='"'''''S '' '-- / GRAVEL PACK RECORD Size Interval TEST DATA Date Tested ' / ` Type of Pump Length of Test Sustained Yield (Metered) Drawdown WELL DRILLERS STATEMENT The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says: he is the driller of the well hereon described; he has read the statement made hereon; knows the content thereof, and the same is true of his o„,wri know edge. License No day of My Commission expires , 19 Notary Public WRJ-•S,-69 DIVISION OF WV RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF NATI /L RESOURCES ,� : ('* Srt.rrtr. rtrt,(rt'rt: , Pp•fizmr.c.4,1 1,y 1:Ham STATES DEPARTMET1 of AGRICULTURE * SOIL cooperating with 4.)S.111,1. AND .11SCOCIA.S COOPERATI/4 IN SOIL SURVEY 00 /le e C A/./2e ..826. FARM NO... - OPERATOR _ . SCALE 8 V2272/ ACRES COUNT 1r 0.44 OsZ,K.1 0 0 PHOTO NO.„ X//442,/77S±.51.1 ••••••••ammom....... RVATIOii SERVICE , • • • t. • •I •rt. - 1„ A t ..`"Vrt rt", • e rt - •-• 1 • . (r .1 • , • ' • ' • • • • xbt • •, • ; \ ( • (r 17/-9 - N ci ,-------...,,„ \ .i, ,•,, .. \ , , , I :, are ,,,,' • '",,, „,,,,, \ -4 .,',, '‘...1 '1 . f V ,,: ' -1-:,-k ),- 0 ' / \ .,„,,, ,,,z • . \ ,,,: ( (-- ''', 2:',. if) t P ,., ..„.... -. ',,•';,.•., '''; ?, , I . , .„.., • I II \ >:30 dr v. i (1 \ ,((.tt .7( . *21 • • • Yt,/,'„ • \•-„,,‘ , • `22 • \ • \ 1 rtOrt IL.; rt. ' 1 - I rt rt. 7/-P • i rtt, H 1 1 tt L rt (1( rt A 6 1 si , , '. ''''. ' .,,,,,•,,,,-.. t , , ' ..„./ . • - ' .0.\--A , p ... ,. - ,4. /I_ .= - 1•,,,•: t4 .rt*:, s',, .( A,' ('..1:VT-• e--.. 4,:lf• \ • A .((;(. \ N . 1 .-- . : ' ' . ,V, ,... _. , ..1: ii t ,• ' ' ,..„. ir 3 • . { '9 I A 3 N! , - . 't -N • \- / l• .12,,, 1 • 4 t r l< \ , ,,..,_.... + L.. L. ) 7/C 4. • ke. Jt A • ('(\, , a (.,•;\ • • 7, • - t. i" "(t• -i .rt/ t247'..-; 11 /,-"`" I • \j'•;• ,^•,.,?-m? 1.1- ( 1- 7 ' ' • "'`,.... ,17-, , , '\J --,,l'""-..,:,..•____,'''''''-',.,-- i / ': t - ,•., P- 4 ,,,,i ... 4 t .....*.Z....1,.. t...14 :.;.:S : ......z.,., ...1- rt. .......1.,..1 ' '.:1 . ' \rt ' \ \.2 \ 1 X6 Li- irt4 • ft Li '. t:_':._ - (..\ _.2...((i _L__ ....\ _ . 1 .... . '1 I 4 4, arro • • • STANDARD MAP SYMBOLS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service COLORADO Roads ✓ i✓ Good motor -- Rock outcrop ✓✓ Fence -x—x- Poor motor or private °°:4' o side of ditch, etc. Gravel Trail o b TRAIL fragments PP 4 Shelterbelt Railroads 1 ) I h Clay spot X Stream bank protection.. --K-A-�,- Buildings w sl Bedrock escarpment vv-ci oP Dike or levee-494-fi+$i- SchoolLi Gumbo or scabby spot Pipeline 1--11-1t-i Church 6Sand spot Flume or syphon Gravel pit, open mine, or quarry 5e Gully 'tMfv-4- �_v5 GNAL Canal (label) CAVA; Farm, ranch, or other Made land E operations boundary Irrigation ditch Blowout Field or land use boundary - — -- Lake or Pond Pickup ditch-P-►-P- Land capability, range, orPermanent Water Diversion -D-`•-o- �r_�r woodland site boundary Intermittent Water Mi Drainage Ditch Range condition boundary (open drain) Wet spot or Pot Hole X11 . Closed or tile drain -0-4-0- Range condition EC, GC, FC, PC Marsh area or .41.1[4_ Terrace it-�--r- Farmstead H Spot Spring o-a- l:J Field number O Field acreage 320 Ac. wILOLIlf Special purpose plantings (label) Tent site Trailer site Picnic shelter Small recreation area .... (label as to type) 11IDA•SC$•1Ofl+:1-0. OAIi 1111 M' 4206 ED. TENNIS Dam and reservoir Stock pond, tank or charco Spring development Spring and trough Trough Well (label) Windmill WELL 0 Vegetative waterway7:7=•' ==� Division box or turnout. -*--T Diversion or spreader dam Check dam or gully plug Drop structure