Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationRECEIVED MAY 2 4 2001 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO HCE JOB NUMBER: 2000056.01 May 24, 2001 Prepared for: Jim and Paul Luginbuhl PO Box 950 Basalt, CO 81621 Prepared by: High Country Engineering, Inc. 923 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 TABLE OF CONTENTS Application Form Preliminary Plan Requirements Letter of Application Title Policy Mineral Rights Owners Water Supply Plan Engineering Report • Water Report • ISDS Plan • Traffic Report • Drainage Report Vegetation Report Land Design Partnership Land Title Association Land Design Partnership Zancanella & Associates, Inc. High Country Engineering, Inc. Beach Environmental, LLC Geotechnical Report Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Gamma Radiation Survey Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Wildlife Report Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Protective Covenants Land Design Partnership Revised Preliminary Plans High Country Engineering, Inc. knwp 2000'.056 preco+is.wpd Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan )00000( Final Plan SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM SUBDIVISION NAME: NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION OWNER: Jim and Paul Luginbuhl ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR:, Planner - Land Design Part.; Engineer/Surveyor - High Country Eng., Inc LOCATION: Section: 11 & Section 2 Township: 6S Range: 93W WATER SOURCE: Individual wells for each lot protected by West Divide Water Conservation District Contract. SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: Individual on lot disposal system PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: County Road 221 EXISTING ZONING: Agriculture / Residential / Rural Density EASEMENTS: Irrigation ditch , and power line TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residential Single Family D up lex Multi -family Mobile Home 0 (2) Commercial Floor Area Acres Number Acres 11 plus accessory dwellings 65.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3) Industrial 0 0 (4) Public/Quasi-Public (Road ROW) 3.83 (5) Open Space / Common Area 2.41 TOTAL: 65.96 PARKING SPACES: Residential 44 estimated as required for single family residences and accessory dwellings Commercial Industrial GARFIELD COUNTY PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIRMENTS NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION The following outlines each element of the subdivision regulations and notes generally where this information can be found in the application. REGULATION REFERENCE SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION 4.50 4:50 A 4.50 B 4.50 C 4.50 D 4.50 E 4.50 F 4.50 G 4.50 H 4.50 1 4.50 .t 4.50 K 4.50 L 4.50 M 4.50 N 4.50 0 4.60 4.60 A 4.60 B 4.60 C 4.60 D 4.60 E 4.60 F 4.60 G 4.60 H 4.70 4.70 A 4.70 B 4.70 C PRELIMINARY PLAN MAP Name of Subdivision Date etc. Boundary & Legal Names of Owner, Eng E Vicinity Map Adjacent Properties Lot Areas Easements Setbacks Land Use Summary Existing Conditions Common Open Space Public Land Dedication No school site or public lands be paid per county regulations. Street Grades Existing Easements LOCATION SHEET # 1 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 2 tc SHEET # 1 SHEET # 1 &2 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 3 SHEET # 2 SHEET # 2 to be dedicated. School impact fees will SHEET # 4 SHEET # 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Terms of Dedications COVENANTS Phasing N/A Final platting and construction will be done as one phase. Evidence of Access SHEET # 2 Off-street Parking N/A No non single family residential uses proposed. Soil & Topo Hazards HP GEOTECH REPORT Radiation Hazard HP GEOTECH REPORT Title Commitment/Deed TITLE POLICY Sectional Subdivision N/A SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Geology HP GEOTECH REPORT Soils HP GEOTECH REPORT & SCS MAP & TABLES BEACH ENVIR, REPORT Vegetation 4.70 D Wildlife BEATTIE WILDLIFE REPORT 4.80 4.80 A 4.80 B 4.80 C 4.80 D 4.90 4.91 4.91 A 4.91 B 4.91 C 4.91 D 4.91 E 4.92 4.92 A 4.92 B 4.92 C 4.92 D 4.92 E 4.93 4.94 DRAINAGE PLAN Existing Water Courses Tributary Areas Tributary Flows Design of Drainage Fac, UTILITY PLAN Water Supply Rights, Quality & Quantity Central Supply Existing System Individual Supply Augmentation Pian Sanitary Sewer Public Sewer Central Treatment Existing District Individual Sewage Disp, ISDS Management Plan UTILITY & ROAD PLANS OFF-SITE ROAD IMPACT FEE SHEET # 3 DRAINAGE REPORT DRAINAGE REPORT SHEET # 3 WELLS ZANCANELLA LTR. NIA N/A ZANCANELLA LTR. ZANCANELLA LTR. N/A N/A N/A ENG. REPORT ENG. REPORT SHEET # 4 & 5 LETTER OF APPLICATION LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP 918 Cooper Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-22461 Fax 970-945-4066 May 1, 2001 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Dept, 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Native Springs Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application — Original submission - September 2000 Updated Resubmission — May 1, 2001 Dear Mark: Attached herewith is the Preliminary Plan and Supplemental Information as required for preliminary plan review and a check for the application fee of $675 for the above referenced property. Also attached is a check to for the Colorado Geologic Survey review in the amount of $595.The proposed subdivision property is a 65.9 acre tract located on County Roads 221 and 210 Tess than two miles east of the City Rifle. On behalf of the owners Jim and Paul Luginbuhl, I request that this application be reviewed for completeness in accordance with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Th e following is offered as a supplemental introduction to the preliminary plan application. LAND USE SUMMARY: Existing Zoning: Agriculture / Residential / Rural Density Total Development Area: 65.95 acres Total Number of Lots: 11 Total Number of Dwelling Units: Primary Units 11 Accessory Units 11 Total 22 Total Area of Non-residential Floor Space: 0 Total Number of Dwellings per Structure: one Total Number of Off-street Parking Spaces: As required for single family residences and accessory units. Gross Density: 3.0 acres per dwelling unit including all possible accessory dwelling units (0.33 dwellings per acre) 6.0 acres per dwelling with no accessory dwellings (0.17 dwellings per acres) 1 ACCESS The project is accessed from County Road 221 by a, 1,250 foot long cul-de-sac which is in excess of the county design standard of 600 feet. The cul-de-sac has been oversized with a road radius of 60 feet and an 80' radius ROW to accommodate easy movement of emergency vehicles. An alternative configuration would be a through a road connecting CR 221 and 210. This would require a significant earthen fill to achieve an acceptable gradient and alignment leading to CR 210 and result in an objectionable visual impact on the site. A through connection would also result in a "shortcut" between CR 210 and 221 resulting in unnecessary traffic flow through the subdivision. The Garfield County Road & Bridge Department commented during the Sketch Plan that they preferred there not be any access from County Road 210. Each residence is proposed to be equipped with fire sprinkler systems and 30,000 gallons of fire protection water will be provided in buried tanks in the cul-de-sac. The vegetational character of the property now and after build -out is such that there is minimal risk of a wildfire at the site. The Rifle Fire District has indicated to the development team that the on site water storage and over -sized cul-de-sac satisfies their needs for fire protection services and the requirement of residential fire sprinklers offer an extremely effective additional level of fire protection. The fire sprinkler systems will qualify the residences for much lower priced fire insurance. Because of the minimal risk of a wildfire at this site, the low density of the project, the provision of an oversized cul-de-sac combined with the fire protection water storage and residential sprinkler systems, the Fire District did not recommend an emergency access from the cul-de- sac. In consideration of these conditions, the Applicant requests a variance from the allowed Maximum Length of Cul-de-sac. WATER Each lot will be served by a well located on the lot. Attached herewith is a detailed report on the legal and physical water supply. The P&Z requested that a central water system be investigated for the project. Several factors were considered in the analysis of a community water system versa individual wells: 1. Initial cost of construction the individual and community, systems. The cost of the community water system with a water storage tank is approximately 9-10 times more expensive than the combined cost of drilling and equipping all of the individual wells in the project. 2. Adequacy of fire protection. The proposed 30,000 gallons of fire protection water meets the needs of the Fire District for low density rural subdivisions. The requirement for in house fire sprinkler systems offers a level of protection that equals that of a community water system with a large fire protection water storage capacity because the sprinkler systems are so effective at containing residential fires. The sprinkler systems are immediately effective at suppressing a fire where as a central water system has no impact on fire suppression until the fire department arrives at the scene of the fire. By 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 the time the fire department arrives at a rural site, the fire has already caused considerable damage. In-house sprinklers appear to offer better protection than a central water system. Even with the added cost of the in-house fire sprinklers, the on lot wells are far less expensive than the central water system. 3. Implications for water quality. The water quality of wells at the site are adequate for residential use but is of such a quality that many residents may wish to install reverse osmosis systems to enhance the quality of water for personal consumption purposes. A central water system does nothing to enhance the water quality. Installation of reverse osmosis treatment on a central system is much more complex and expensive than are individual residential applications. The relative small amount of discarded water from the individual systems can be discharged in to the on lot sewage treatment systems and returned to the ground water. The large volumes of discard water from a community treatment facility, creates a significant challenge in providing for its disposal. 4. Monitoring of the physical supply and quality over the Ionq term. The home owners association can effectively monitor the water levels and water quality in the individual wells or in a central well. Provisions for such monitoring of the individual wells is included in the protective covenants. Given the dramatic difference in the cost of a central water system compared to a well on each lot and the superior fire protection that can be provided by the proposed in- house sprinklers, a central water system was not proposed for the development. SEWER The Cottonwood Springs Mobile Home Park w. contacted in regard to the potential contracting with them for the treatment of s: age from the Native Springs development. Attached is a letter from t - legal counsel for Cottonwood Springs stating capacity is not available for the ative Springs development. Native Spring is too small of a development to absorb e cost of constructing the 3,000 foot plus length of sewer line needed to connect to ' ottonwood Springs, plus there would be significant additional fees related to the -. . i sion of their treatment plant. These are costs much beyond the financial scope • sidential lots. Just the sewer collection lines within the boundaries of the develo. - nt would be nearly equal to the per lot cost of individual, on lot sewage disposal systems. All lots are five acres or larger. This provides more than adequate room for ISDS facilities and the appropriate separation from the on lot wells. An ISDS management program is included in the attached engineer's report and said management program will be included in the protective covenants. All ISDS facilities are required by plat note to be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. IRRIGATION WATER The attached plans show the distribution of irrigation water by underground pipes to ■ 1 ■ ■ 1 I; r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 each lot. The irrigation water will not be pressurized except by the moderate grade change across the property. Each lot will need to add their own pumping system if they choose to apply irrigation water through a sprinkler system or large spray guns. RELATIONSHIP TO THE GARFIELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following text summarizes how the proposed development is in general conformity with the Goals identified in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan adopted in October of 1984, which was in effect at the time of submission of the Preliminary Plan. AGRICULTURE Goal: Ensure that farm and ranch activities are not forced out of production by non-agricultural uses. The area, at the rear of each lot, restricted from building development serves to buffer the surrounding agricultural uses from the residential activities of the new development. Flow-through irrigation ditches will be preserved and areas not committed to building development will continue to be irrigated with the property's water rights, Even with an accessory dwelling on each lot, the gross project density is lower than that allowed by the existing zone district. HOUSING Goal: Provide for affordable and diverse housing types capable of accommodating the needs of county residents, in all income ranges, without putting a financial burden on existing public services. The Native Springs Subdivision is directed at families desiring a small rural acreage that can accommodate a limited amount of livestock while offering easy access to the primary valley transportation system and local commercial services. Such a product can be offered at this location at a price significantly lower than is possible in Garfield County upriver from Glenwood Springs. INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL Goal: Maintain and support the existing economic base of the county and encourage further diversification, which will broaden employment opportunities and help stabilize the economic future of the region. No commercial uses are proposed by the project. Residents of the project will provide additional consumers for the City of Rifle commercial community. RECREATION / OPEN SPACE Goal: Ensure county residents and visitors have ample recreational opportunities through the development of and maintenance of parks, recreation facilities 4 and passive open space. The gracious size of the proposed lots will serve to satisfy many of the recreational needs of the new residents. Open space preservation is promoted by the clustered design that preserves nearly half of the lot area as visual (passive) open space. Additionally, the 2.4 acres west of CR 210 will be dedicated to the home owners association as permanent open space thereby protecting a piece of a visually sensitive natural terrain feature. TRANSPORTATION Goal: Ensure that the county transportation system is safe and functional for all types of traffic and is compatible with the contours of the land. The on site access road is proposed on very gently sloping land and will be built to the applicable Garfield County Road Design Standards with the exception of a cul-de-sac that exceeds the standards in total length. The cul-de-sac could be designed as a through road but it would be a road built in conflict with the contours of the land and, because of its potential for becoming a short-cut between CR 221 and 210, it would encourage inappropriate traffic through the subdivision. Traffic from the subdivision will have limited impact on the county road system since the project is only about a mile from State Highway 6 & 24 via either CR 221 or 210. The project is within Off-site Road Impact Study Area 4 and will pay the Off-site Road Impact Fees defined by Garfield County Regulations. These fees will be used to help mitigate traffic impacts on the county road system within Study Area 4. WATER and SEWER Goal: Ensure that provision of legal, adequate, dependable, and cost effective sewer and water facilities and to encourage new development to locate in proximity to existing sewer and water facilities. SCS soils mapping indicates that all lots will have access to soils that will support sanitation leach fields that have only moderate limitations due to slower percolation rates. The Targe lot size and the small number of lots is not conducive to the installation of sewer collection or water distribution systems nor to centralized treatment or storage facilities. Shared use of the existing privately owned central water system and central wastewater treatment facility is prohibitive due to the length of lines necessary to access these systems. Connecting points to these existing systems are more than 2,000 feet away. ENVIRONMENT Goal: Encourage a land use pattern which considers the environmental sensitivity of the land, does not overburden the physical capacity of the land and is in 5 the best interest of county residents. The proposed plan protects steep slopes west of CR 210 from disturbance. There are no other environmentally sensitive areas on the site except for some wetlands located in the borrow ditch along CR 221. These wetlands would not be disturbed by the proposed road configuration. COMMUNITY SERVICES Goal: Maintain adequate and dependable levels of community services such as schools, health care, public administration, pollee and fire protection, necessary to support all present and future residents of the county. The relatively close proximity of the development site to the City of Rifle will help minimize the impacts on some community services. The contribution of the residents of the development to the sales tax revenues of the City of Rifle will also help support some community service agencies. The development will pay the standard school impact fee. URBAN AREAS OF INFLUENCE Goal: Insure that development occurring in the county which will affect a municipality is compatible with the future urbanization plans of the appropriate jurisdiction. The site is segregated from the expanding land use patterns of East Rifle by the high rock bluffs west of CR 210. The lower density residential land use proposed by this project should not have an impact on the urbanization of areas immediately east of the City of Rifle. If you have any questions or desire any additional information please call me at the above referenced phone numbers. Ronald B. Liston 6 TITLE POLICY 6d! ■ ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Land Title Guarantee Company Date: April 10, 2000 PAUL B. LUGINBUHL AND JIM E. LUGINBUHL P.O. 130X 950 BASALT, CO 81621 Enclosed please find the title insurance policy for your property located at , RIFLE, CO 81650 Please review this policy in its entirety. In the event that you find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions regarding your anal title policy, you may contact Title Department Phone: 970-945-2610 Fax: 970-945-4784 Please refer to our Order No. GW233358 Should you decide to sell the property described in this policy, or if you are required to purchase a new title commitment for mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance premiums. Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of this policy so we will be able to provide future products and services to you quickly and efficiently. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you. Sincerely. Land Title Guarantee Company 0 Form AO/ORT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LTG Policy No. LTHH233358 Our Order No. GW233358 Schedule A Amount $424,000.04 Property Address: , RIFLE, CO 81650 1. Policy Date: March 27, 2000 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: PAUL 8. LUGINBUHL AND JIM E. LUGINBUHL 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: PAUL B. LUGINBUHL AND JIM E. LUGINBUHL 5. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Tltle Insurance Company LTG Policy No. LTHH233358 ■ Our Order No. GW233358 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 11 AND THE SW1/4SEI/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 93 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, MARKED WITH A 2 112" ALUMINUM CAP, THENCE S 89 DEGREES 29'33" W 667.45 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NE1f4NE1f4NW1f4 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE 5 00 DEGREES 11'16" E 287.89 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NEIf4NEIf4NW 1,4 TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE WIMMER PARCEL AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 367 AT PAGE 458; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 31'32" E 279.44 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WIMMER PARCEL; THENCE S 00 DEGREES 22'28" E 1028.81 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WIMMER PARCEL, ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE1/4NWI14 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 37'45" E 382.26 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NW1/4NE114 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 39'46" E 1315.08 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NW114NE1f4; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 10'59" W 1319.25 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW1f4NEIf4; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 39'37" W 466.37 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SWif4SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE 5 89 DEGREES 34'26" W 1013 04 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 210: THENCE S 36 DEGREES 37'43" W 219.93 FEET ALONG SAID R.O.W.; THENCE 5 35 DEGREES 58'55" W 174.94 FEET ALONG SAID R.O.W.; THENCE S 36 DEGREES 4944" W 102.62 FEET ALONG SAID R.Q. W. TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SWI/45E114 OF SECTION 2; THENCE S 00 DEGREES 57'59" E 67.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO Form AO/ORT Our Order No. GW233358 Schedule B LTG Policy No. s, i rind.)»a This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1 Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments. and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. TAXES FOR 2000 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS ONLY, NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE. 6. DEED OF TRUST DATED MARCH 27, 2000, FROM PAUL B. LUGINBUHL AND JIM E. LUGINBUHL TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF GEORGE D. GREEN AND ARDIS A. GREEN TO SECURE THE SUM OF 5324,000.00 RECORDED MARCH 27, 2000, IN BOOK 1178 AT PAGE 455 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 561131. 7. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. F) RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1917, IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 105 AND RECORDED MARCH 13, 1923 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 147. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1917, IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 105 AND RECORDED MARCH 13, 1923 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 147. 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1962 IN BOOK 345 AT PAGE 195 AND AT PAGE 199. 11. UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO COLORADO -UTE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 06, 1963, IN BOOK 349 AT PAGE 106. 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT CONVEYED TO US 111 Form AO/ORT Our Order No. GW233358 Schedule B LTG Policy Na. LTHH233358 WEST COMMUNICATIONS RECORDED APRIL 27, 1992 IN BOOK 830 AT PAGE 63. GAS S BETWEEN CTEORG D. GREEN AND ARDIREEN AND 'ETT RCES CORPOTION, RECORDE OCTOBER 02, 1995 IN =O K 954 = T PAGE 6 AND ANY AND ALL SSIG► ENTS TH REOF, INTEREST T R 14. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS. STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. acaxSG.o1 Old Republic National Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Our Order No. GW233358-2 Schedule A Cust. Ref.: Property ,address: TBD COUNTY ROAD 221 RIFLE, CO 81650 1. Effective Date: February 18, 2000 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: "ALTA' Owners Policy 10-17-92 S424,000.00 Proposed Insured: PAUL B. LUGINBUHL AND JIM E. LUGINBUHL 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: GEORGE D. GREEN AND ARDIS A. GREEN 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 Our Order No. GW233358-2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTH 112 OF SECTION 11 AND THE SW1:4SE1/4 OF SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 93 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, MARKED WITH A 2 112" ALUMINUM CAP, THENCE 5 89 DEGREES 29'33' W 667.45 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NE1'4NEI'4NW1J4 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE S 00 DEGREES 11'16" E 287.89 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NE1;4NEL:4NW 1.4 TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE WIMMER PARCEL AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 367 AT PAGE 458; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 31'32" E 279.44 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WIMMER PARCEL; THENCE S 00 DEGREES 22'28" E 1028.81 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WIMMER PARCEL, ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE1/4NW114 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 37'45" E 382.26 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH -1 LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NW 114NE114 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 39'46" E 1315.08 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NWI/4NE1/4; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 1059" W 1319 25 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NWII4NEL'4; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 39'37" W 466.37 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SWI/4SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 34'26" W 1013. 04 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 210; THENCE S 36 DEGREES 37'43" W 219.93 FEET ALONG SAID R.O,W.; THENCE 5 35 DEGREES 58'55" W 174.94 FEET ALONG SAID R.O.W., THENCE 5 36 DEGREES 49'44" W 102.62 FEET ALONG SAID R.O. W. TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SW1/4SE1/4 OF SECTION 2; THENCE 500 DEGREES 57'59" E 67.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED APRIL 29, 1939 IN BOOK 188 AT PAGE 349. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-1 (Requirements) The Following are the requirements to be complied with: Our Order No. GW233358-2 Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest (0 be insured. Proper instruments) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: WARRANTY DEED FROM GEORGE D. GREEN AND ARDIS A. GREEN TO PAUL B. LUGINBUHL AND JIM E. LUGINBUHL CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW233358-2 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: L. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 3. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area. encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. 7 Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. ,i. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges. if any. 9. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 10. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1917, IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 105 AND RECORDED MARCH 13, 1923 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 147. 11. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1917, IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 105 AND RECORDED MARCH 13, 1923 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 147. 12. RESERVATION OF ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERALS AS SET FORTH IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1962 IN BOOK 344 AT PAGE 164. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1962 IN BOOK 345 AT PAGE 195 AND AT PAGE 199. 1 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW233358-2 IThe policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: L4. UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO COLORADO -UTE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 06, 1963, IN BOOK 349 AT PAGE 106, 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT CONVEYED TO US WEST COMMUNICATIONS RECORDED APRIL 27, 1992 IN BOOK 830 AT PAGE 63. 16, OIL AND GAS LEASE BETWEEN GEORGE D. GREEN AND ARDIS A. GREEN AND BARRETI` RESOURCES CORPORATION, RECORDED OCTOBER 02, 1995 IN BOOK 954 AT PAGE 634 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. 17, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATE,MMENT Required by C.R.S. 10-11-122 A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B.) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer's authorized agent. C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners. the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at lease one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform. except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior w the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting From the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available(rypical[y by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. MINERAL RIGHTS MINERAL OWNERS Mineral rights for the property are owned by the George D and Ardis A. Green, 0603 County Road 221, Rifle, Colorado 81650. The oil and gas lease listed in Item #13 of the Title Policy exceptions has expired and is no longer in force. WATER SUPPLY PLAN • 'P.0. Box 1908 (970) 945-5700 1005 Cooper Ave. (970) 945-1253 Fax Inwood CO 81602ings, Z4144CANELL4 4140 /- SSS ?CI4TES, if4C. ENGWIEEf 1Nc CO1400414 5 March 12, 2001 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Dept 109 - 8th Street. Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Native Springs Subdivision Water Supply Dear Mark: ' Zancanella and Associates, Inc. has completed the groundwater investigations for the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. Information contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses, a water supply plan, a summary of the well construction details and results of the pump test on Native Springs Well #2. Water Requirements Table 1, attached, presents the estimated diversions and consumptive use for the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. We have assumed that each of the 22 residences will be occupied by 3.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day. Water will be diverted to irrigate up to 500 square feet of lawn at each residence from the domestic system. Additional irrigation water will be supplied from existing raw water sources. Legal Supply As can be seen from Table 1, the subdivision will divert an average 8.94 AF annually, and consumptively use 1.52 AF. The peak month of June would require a continuous average - diversion of 5.9 gpm. The subdivision is located within Area A of the West Divide Water District and is eligible for the District's temporary exchange plan approved by Garfield County and the Colorado Division of Water Resources. A contract from the West Divide District for 9.39 acre feet, including transit losses, has been approved. A copy is attached. Copies are also attached of the well permits for the wells for each of the 11 lots in the proposed subdivision. Physical Supply ' It is our understanding that the Native Springs Subdivision will be served by individual wells for each lot and will be operated as a noncommunity water supply system as defined by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 1 Well Details The Native Springs Well #2 was compieted on November 1, 2000 by Shelton Drilling 1 Corporation. The well is located in the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 11, Township 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M. The well can be platted approximately 800 feet from the north section line and 1790 feet from the east section line. The approximate location of the well and the Native Springs boundary are shown an the attached general location map, Figure 1. The well was drilled to a total depth of 73 feet, through the Pleistocene to Recent alluvial and colluvial cover, to the top of the Tertiary Wasatch Formation. Water was encountered, during drilling at approximately 46 feet. The static water level in the Native Springs Well #2 on November 2, 2000 was 25.92 feet below the top of the well casing. The well was constructed with ten feet of slotted steel well screen set at a depth of 60 - 70 feet. At its current static water level there is approximately 34.1 feet (60 feet - 25.9 feet) of available drawdown. The drawdown represents the available drop from the initial static level. The attached Figure 2 has been prepared to illustrate the well construction details. Also attached is the well construction report from Shelton Drilling. Pump Test A pump test was conducted on November 2 and 3, 2000 by Samuelson Pump Company utilizing an electric submersible pump powered by a portable generator. The pump test was conducted at an initial rate of 15 gallons per minute (gpm) and was held at that rate throughout the test. The well was pumped continuously for a 25 hour period at the 15 gpm rate. The drawdown and time data collected during the test are presented in Table 2. We have plotted the results of the test in a drawdown vs. time curve as shown on the attached Figure 3. The maximum drawdown during the 25 -hour test was approximately 13.75 feet. The water level was declining only slightly near the end of the test. The water level remained well above the pump intake during the entire test. Recovery data for the well following the pump test was collected for a sixty minute period after the pumping stopped and was checked again at two later intervals. The recovery data are also summarized in Table 2. The recovery plotted as residual drawdown is shown in Figure 4. Based on the residual drawdown curve, the well displayed normal recovery characteristics. Water Quality Finally, water samples were collected during the pump test and sent to Grand Junction Labs for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for Nitrates / Nitrites and bacteria, as required by Garfield County. In addition, Phase 11 and V inorganic were performed. Copies of the lab results, on state forms, are attached. All the inorganic elements and the Nitrate / Nitrite results were below the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLS), as established by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. The result of the bacteria test shows that no coliform bacteria were present in the sample. Conclusions It is our opinion that Native Springs Well #2 demonstrates that the well will be able to provide an adequate water supply for Lot #2. Figure 5 shows the topographic map of the area of the proposed subdivision overlain by a portion of the Preliminary Geologic Map of Page 2 the Silt Quadrangle (Shroba, Fairer and Morris, 1994, U. S. G. S. Open File Report 94- 696). It can be seen that, in general, the same geologic formations underlie the entire Native Springs Subdivision. The Tertiary Wasatch Formation (Tw) is the basal unit with the Quaternary alluvial and colluvial deposits (Qac) occurring above. The Qac deposits form the primary aquifer in this environment. There is some influence from the Quaternary sheet wash deposits (Qsw) being shed off the bluff to the northwest of the subdivision, however it is believed that these deposits would not substantially alter the aquifer characteristics. It is reasonable to assume that other wells drilled within the Native Springs Subdivision would have properties similar to Well #2 and that an adequate water supply will be available for the other lots in the proposed subdivision. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. ir1.C1n.+-c�,ll��L Thomas A. Zancanella, P. E. : -- mrd Bradley C. Peek, Geologist Attachments cc: Paul and Jim Luginbuhl N.\20000120722 Native Springs SubBBean-WaterRept.wpd Page 3 O - - ■s ■■■ i M. = ■■O - - ■M■ - = M s - - - 1 Month January February March April May June July August September October November December Table 1 Native Springs Subdivision 11 Lots, 11 ADUs Estimated Water Requirements .1,t. • ',e 4 Pe'llltot# n.!rtrM#� # of Residences 22.0 units # persons/residence 3.5 cap/unit # gallons/person/day 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 15% Lawn Irrigation 500 sq -Mot Application Efficiency 70% Crop irrig reqmnt (CIR) 2.17 ft__� (11 i21 Domestic Commercial OomlComm Pond We. Water Use Inputs # of Commercial Units 0.0 # personslunit 0 0 # gallonslpersonlday 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 15% Lawn Irrigation 0 sq-ft/unit Application Efficiency 70% Crop brig reqmnt (CIR) 2.17 ft Water Use Calculations IFA-K►41+�L_,,;,�Sri:srklll>t,t ;r r 161 17( (31 (41 tsl In-house Inhouse Irrigation 1ac4t) (ac4t( .1oz-rt) 0.73 0.66 0.73 0.71 0.73 0.71 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.73 0.71 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Evap. (ac4q Medi tae -n1 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual 8.62 0.00 __ _0.32 0.00 0.00 Augeg 24, 21We becomes & Dasa., Inc. Weew Reettecsa Escoreara OMmesed $paps. CO Jobe 20723 equao.123 Total (ac nl 073 0.66 0 73 0.72 0 80 0.79 0.81 0.79 0 75 073 0.71 0.73 8.94 Average Flow Wm) 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.8 5.9 5.9 57 57 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.54 is) Domesi lc In-liuusa (ac -fly 011 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 11 0.11 0.11 011 0.11 0.11 _ `i, K}rLfC .r titter Damps,~+s r <�„ ' Pond Surface Area 0 acres "Annual Net Evaporation 2 74 ft Livestock 0 units Livestock Consumption 15 gpud tirrigated Open Space 0 acres IjApplication Efficiency 70% I,Crop Irrig regrrint (CIR) 2.17 ft (6} (101 Commercial In-house la ctil 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dorn(Comum Irrigation lac •II1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1111 Pond Evap. fax t1I 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 }121 Live- stock (ac•tt} 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1131 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.14 0 11 0.11 0.11 (141 Average Flow Igpm} 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.29 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.94 MA Mil MN MIN IMO INN MI INN OM MI MN MIN Days in Month 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 Location: Rifle, Colorado Airport Elevation: 5500 Feet Latitude: 39 Degrees North (1) (2) (3) Mean % of Mon. Temp Daylight Month Days (F) Hours May Ju11e July August September October 14 31 30 31 31 30 16 Totals_ -- ` 183 BLANEY - GRIDDLE CONSUMPTIVE USE CALCULATIONS (4) (5) (6) Cons. Use Coeff. 46.7 ---•--55.4 64.1 Days 70.5 68.5 59.8 48.8 4.16 9.95 10.03 10.14 9.51 0.850 1.124 1.129 --- _..__ 0.971 0.618 0.929 0.790 8.38, 4.0; (1) Total Growing Season (April 15 - October 15) (2) Rifle Weather Stations (3) 39 Degrees Latitude adjusted for (1) (4) Derived from Agricultural Research Services Report "Water Uses by Native Grasses in High Altitude Colorado Meadows." Cons. Use Total Ppl. (in.) 155 6.20 726 6.96 5.33 4.66 1.55 Total Precip. (in.) 0.95 1 06 0 95 1.01 1 05 1 19 1.35 7.56 063 (7) (6) Effective Precip. (in.) 0 67 0.96 0.91 095 0.90 0 98 0.93 6.29 0.52 Excess Precip. (in.) 0 28 8 10 0 04 0 06 0 15 0 21 - -- 042 - f 127 0 11 (9) (10) Cons. Use (in.) 1 37 6 09 722 b 5 18 4 45 1 13 32 33 2 69 Net Irrig. Required (in.) (ft.) 0 70. 5 14 631 5 95 4 28 3 47 0 20 26 03 2 17 006 0 43 0 53 0.50 036 0.29 0.02 26 03 (5) Blaney -Cuddle Consumptive Use, Columns (2)"(3)'(4)1100 (6) Rifle Weather Stations (7) SCS Technical Release #21, September 1970 7 00 Based on a Net Depth of App. (8) Precipitation Unavailable to Vegetation, Columns (6)-(7) (9) Consumptive Use adjusted for Effective Precipitation Columns (5)-(8) (10) Consurnptive Use minus Effective Precipitation, Columns (9)-(7) 217 Monthly ET 2.69% 19.73% 24.23% 22.84% 16.44% 13.31% 0.76% inches reel inches 1 1 1 R93W V -0 •V• G,;•''' tat: "••••••••?-r-.. '\\,) ' - - - ,i : '• • —1 . a ' 'i 1 r 1 '•—•''.11 -,F1 : / .• i . k:—. f • ,,,, • / . e ''''' e'7, • j ' ' _:•• .‘L-,- -5::, -----.. .3.—.°6 - •• ,;•- ' . I •z: _•-• ..: ......, • I- • _ •-• ''......- . 1 . . - ••••„1A ;1 '"C-- -•'----- --1. 7:. :—..'.-','0 . r C . 5;.. v-..-ALLC" 7 , -..,......- • • _, • •, 0 .. — .. ,-.. ,- •.•-- "7.446A3 _.-- f AIM PM' =FR Illia MEIN 1 11 '14 I I '`-• \ 5C,55‘ • Well #2 54 • 7,5524 0 - 1 • W F • 11 ff.( `1•1;1-"A". 0 • 7 12 prraarexler • 5J443 , • ; ' 3. -Pr • " • ... . : ..4......... -.A...., ; t 4, /---;.- .1r— - - ..4"-- 4, 1 >1....'7 • . • • — - • 711./ 539:1;,"-- . \ .2c.attield County Ai rim 45o0 I) 1000 2000 Scabs in Feet T5 S T 6 S PROJECT LOCATION MAP SOUL DAM ecus r $$ 1X0 Dee. 7,1 2000 NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION ZANC4MaL4 AA09 ASSOCIA 7E4' NC DIGNIERAe caysarAm ron wrot meg ?um -; tam come mei* &MOM VralimP. =MCC lien COO 6.4-40,10 FIGURE NO. PROJECT: 20122 • GROUND LEVEL CLAYS, SANDS GRAVELS, SANDS WASATCH FURMATIUN TOTAL DEPTH 73' 10- 0- 20- 20 30- 30- 40- 40- 50- 50- 60- 60 70 70 EMENT 10' TO 24' 0' TO 73' 9' DIA, HOLE STATIC WATER LEVEL 25.92' ON NOVEMBER 2, 2000 —1' TO 60' 7' C.D. PLAIN STEEL 0.240' WALL CSG 60' TO 70' 7' ❑,D, SLOTTED STEEL SCREEN 0.240'- WALL_ THICKNESS_ NATIVE SPRINGS WELL #2 DETAIL ir•Uat mink xokTo &obi Dunmire 7.2000 ..a 1 W H[2' csoIFImorn TAZ TAZ NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION rA4CA/11EZLA AND ,4SSZM1ZS IAC eAtTIl4EENG Meru Tia+VTS Mr WPM NM IOW un worm *our aim= mom. magyar NM Me Orr-var 2 20, 722 REAL TIME Time I minutes) W.L. Measurement (feet} Drawdown (feet) igpml t' (minutest tit' II 200:; 30. t1 11.2:00 11 31 AM 11.100 1 1:32 .AM 11.2.00 I1.34.AM 11;2_00 11::35 AM 11/2100 11:36 AM {l 1 6 11/2/00 11:38 AM 1 1 1 1 I IL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE 2 Pump Test Data Well ID: Native Springs Well =' Job No.: '_0722 Q = 15 Qpm Client: Native SPrtngs r = d Test Bv: Samuelson S.W.L. = 25.92 tt Analysis Bv: BCP b = t1 TimeiDate on: 1 12100 1 1:)O AM M.P. = Time/Date off: 11/3:00 1 05 PM projected Test Length: 25:35:00 total time 11/20'00 11:40 AM 8 10 25.92 SW L. 28.29 2.37 28.77 2.85 20 12.5 29.62 3.70 15 30.58 4.66 15 31.25 5.33 15 11/2,00 11:45 AM 11.02.00 11:50 AM 11.2.00 12:00 PM 11 2 00 i 2:10 PM 11.2.00 12:20 PM 11'2:00 12:30 PM 11;2.00 1:30 PM 1! 2002::30PM 1 1.2_.00 3:30 PM 1 1.2 00 4:00 PM 11/100 11:00 PM 1:3;00 1:05 PM 11.3:00 1:06 PM 11:3 00 1:0' PM 15 20 30 40 50 60 120 180 240 270 690 1535 1536 1537 32.67 33.69 35.92 6.75 7.77 10.00 15 15 15 37.00 37.17 11.08 11.25 15 15 37.17 37.31 11.25 I 11.39 15 15 1 1.3.00 1:08 PM 11/3/00 1:09 PM 11/3/00 1:10 PM 11/3/00 1:13 PM 11/3/00 1:17 PM 11/3/00 1:20 PM 1113/00 1:25 PM 11/3100 1:36 PM 11/3/00 1:45 PM 1113100 1:55 PM 1538 1539 1540 1543 1547 1550 1555 1566 1575 1585 11/3/00 2:05 PM 11/3000 6:30 PM 11/4/00 12:00 PM 1595 1860 2910 37.32 37.38 37.50 37.52 37.55 38.40 39.67 32.23 29.47 28.00 27.15 26.81 26.50 2638 26.32- 26.26 26.19 26.18 26.15 26.10 26.08 26.02 11.40 11.46 11.58 11.60 11.63 12.48 13.75 6.31 3.55 2.08 1.23 0.89 0.58 0.46 0.40 0.34 0.27 0.26 0.23 0.18 0,16 0.10 15 15 15 15 15 15 Stop Pumvin 0 0 0 1536 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 12 15 20 31 769 513 385 308 193 129 103 78 40 50 60 325 1375 51 39 32 27 6 1218/00 Zancanella &Associates. Inc We112!'urapTcst = IMM M N M OM I 10 15 20 25 �• 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 1 10 Figure 3 Native Springs Well #2 25 Hour Pumping Test an 11/2/00 -1113100 100 Time (nein) 1,000 Q = 15 gpm throughout test Welt TD = 70 ft. 10, 000 f Day 1 Day Day 2 Day 5 100,000 Day 10 1,000,000 12500 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Weti2PumpTest M. _ E I — — — — — — — M MI ® — — — — Feet From Static Le 10 20 30 40 0 VI 50 Q 60 70 1 10 Figure 4 Native Springs Well #2 Recovery as Residual Drawdown 100 tit' 1000 10000 100000 12155+00 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. WeII2PumpTest 1 a 1 i I ; ■1 i i 1 ,, k I r I I o I i• • I i I r i , i • I i I i I F • 1 Recovery following pump test 11/2/00 - 11/3/00. [ 1 12155+00 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. WeII2PumpTest GEOLOGIC MAP NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION ISED 7124149 111 1 1 1 Name of Anplscant; C tract #000906PSL(a ) Map #355 Date Activated 09/06/00 WEST DrVIDE WATER. CONSERVANCY DISTRICT t A^_'yR ALLOTMYNT CONTRACT/LEASE Paul 3. Lua nbunl and Jim E. Luginbuh] 1.uanEtY of +ater in Acre =eet: 9.39 Applicant. heresy aDpi i e5 to the west Di vl ae `water Canserlancy District. a political sunai vi si oil of the State t3f Colorado. �r'ganized aursuant to ana existing by virtue of C.R.S. 1973. 5,37-15-131. at :e4.. (hereinafter referral to as ;.he '7i strict';or .an allotment contract/lease -o oenericiaiiy ana ;erpetuaily use water ,r Ater rignts cwnec. ieasea..;r IIhereafter acauired by the district. 3y execution of this contract/lease ana the attached application. Applicant hereoy agrees to the following terms arta conaitions: Water gi©fltt: Applicant shall owneater rignts at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to ci'+err water. wince xi1l :.e sevoiemented and augmented ay ,rater leased herein. tf Applicant intends to divert ereuan a ne l l . e: .oust oe encerst000 oy Applicant that no ri got to of vert exists eel? a va 1 i a well ;emit t !s obtainea item 1 the raloraao Division of pater Resources. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 leant:ee Nater Sopiiee for by tee Applicant ,n tee amount set forth .above shall be viversed 3t Aooiicant's point of diversion frem the District's direct flow water rights. and enen water is unavailable nor civersicn pursuant to administration py the Colaraco State Engineer during periods wren said direct flow water right is not in priority. the District snail release for the use of Applicant up to. said quantity in acre feet per year or storage water owned ar ontroliee ay She District_ :t is unx7erstood that any quantity allottee nram direct flow. storage or otherwise. to the AoDticant ay the District will µe !enited by the priority of the District's decrees ane by tee pnysicaland legal availability of water from District's sources. any cuantity allottee will only se Droviceo so :cog as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the terms and conditions of this contract/lease. The district and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the Colorado River 'dater Conservation District.. and the ability of the _District to allot direct flow ri got Lo the Sop l i cant maybe aepenaent on the consent of the Co i oraap River 'Water Conservat i cn District. if at any time the Applicant determines it requires less water than the amount herein provided. Applicant may so notify the District in writing. and the amount of water allotted under this contract/lease shall be reduced permanently in accordance with such notice. Rates snail be adjusted accordingly in following water years only. 3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial /Ise: Any and all water allotted Applicant by the 3istric: snail to used for the following beneficial use or uses: lunicipal, domestic and relates uses. or ..xmnercial (except to the extent :hat Rueei Reservoir :water may not be available nor c^mmerc:ai as that term is defines an Page 5 of Contract Mo. 2-07- 74_45.47 bece,feen the United States ana the Gest Divide Water Conservancy District). Apoiicant's beneficial use of any and all ',rater allotted shat: be within or trough facilities or upon land awned.. leased. operated. or uncer Applicant's control. a. cecrees and ^el i vert : Exchange releases made by the District out of storage from Ruedi Reserro i r and Green 1ountai n Reservoir. or other works or facilities of the District. or from ocher sources available to the District. snail be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet ;corks of said storage facilities or ac fete decreed point of diversion for said other sources. and release or delivery of water at such outlet ar points shall constitute performance of the District's total ooiigation. Delivery of .rater by the District from Ruedi Reservoir ar Gree» Mountain Reservoir shall be suoject to the District's lease contracts With the United States Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities availanle to L District shall be subject to the contract: 'aws. rules. and regulations governing rel-- es therefrom. Furthermore. the 11 District hereby expressly reserves the right. to stare 'rater and to make exchange releases .ram structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the future. so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement. is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end of each water year (October 13. shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle I :applicant to any refund of payment made for such water. 1 Water service provided by the District shall be Timited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable eater right. and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize he 3istr}ct• s .decrees. lay :311 :n any }reac. r .amount it re'r► Jr alternate points of diversion. The District shall request II_ne ;alorado Division of 'dater Resources to estimate any conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate paint. and .suet estivate 'snail Oe deductea from this amount in eacn case. 11 5. Alternate Dryant 7f `)iverSian and Plan of auomentation: Decrees for alternate points of diversion of the District's water -igats or storage dater may be - iu1red in order far applicant to use the hater service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining sucn decree ;s the axciusive responsibility of Applicant. The District reserves the rignt to review Iand approve any condi tl ons wni a1 nay bee attacned to Judicial approval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to serve ADoiicant's facilities ar lands. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it snail be solely responsible IIfor the ,procedures and legal engineering costs necessary for any cnarlges in 'Mater rigors contemplated herein. and further agrees to indemnify the District from any costs ar losses related thereto, Applicant is solely responsible for providing worts and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver theta to IIApplicant's Intended beneficial use. Irrespective of the amount or water actually transferred to the ApOlicant's paint of diversion, the applicant snail awake annual payments to the District based upon the amount of nater allotted +.oder this contract/Lease. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :n the event the .applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion and to develop an augmentation plan and institute 1 ega i aroc ai ngs for the approval of sucfi augmentation pian to allow the Applicant to 'utilize :he water allotted to Applicant hereunder. the ,applicant snail give the District written notice or such intent. In the event. the Applicant develops arra adjudicates itsn autrtation plan to utilize the water a l l otted hereunder. Applicant snail not be ooligated to pay any amount under Paragraph 19 below. In any event. the District shall have the right to approve or disapprove the Applicant's augmentation plan and the Aopiicant snail provice the District copies of such plan ana of all aieadings and ocher pacers filed with the water court in the adjudication :hereof. 5. Contract/lease 3ayment: Mon -refundable. one time administrative cnarge. 'n the amount determined by the Board of Directors of the District from time to time. shall be submitted with the application for consideration by the District. Annual paynlait for thewater service described herein shall be oetermined by the Board of Directors of the District. The initial annual payment snail be made in full. within thirty (20) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant. among other things. of the eater delivery year to wnlch the initial payment snail apply and the price wisich is applicable to that year. Annual payments for each year thereafter shall be due and payaoie by the applicant on ar before each January 1. if an annual payment is not made by the due date a flat 550 late fee will be assessed. Final written notice prior to cancellation will be sent certified nail. return receipt requested. to the Applicant at sucn address as may be designated by the Applicant in writing ar set farts .n this contract/lease or application. dater use for any part of a water year snail rewire payment for the entire Mater year. clothing nerein shall be construed to as to prevent the District from adjusting the annual rate in its sole discretion for future years only. if payment is not trade within fifteen (15) days after the date of said •written notice. Applicant shall at District's sale potion nave no further rigtat. title or interest under this contract,'lease without further notice. and delivery 2 may De imsed1aeely 6Urt. 11GLi. ueis a ...._..,. - at the discretion of the Board of Director. the District. Upon cancellation of this water allotment contract/lease with the €7istrict. the District ahal1 notify the Division of 'eater Resources offices in Denver and Glenwood Springs_ The Division of Water Resources may then order cessation of 311 'water use. Additional =ees ind '`,fists: applicant agrees to defray any expenses incurred by the District in ccnnecri on 'ei th :he -allotment of water rigncs hereunder. including. but ;lot l i mi ten to. reimeurseeent of legal and engi neerl ng _esee °nc:.r^ea in canner:an with any .Yater eignts and ad;udicaticn necessary Ya allele ,loplicant's use of such allottee water rights. 3_ Asei armieree ?his cantrace lease snail inure to tie Jenefi t of zee heirs, successors or assigns of "awe aarties eerero, Any assignsent of xie ,applicant's rights under :.his contractelease snall be subject ta. and must cone e'en. such ecu rements as the Oistrec: may hereafter edooC regarding aseigr Enc of Contract/lease rights and the assumticn of eantraceelease .loligations ey assignees ina successors. Moaning nex"_''n shaii prevent successors to 3 poreian sf 3pol i cant' s eracert r from applying a :he District for individual ind seoar3te 3 1 l ot.'r nc ontreces/le]seS . No assignment snail :e re ogni zed 7y eee District exceoe even eeroiecien aria filing of arooer forms for range of wiersni D . Moon the sale of the real prooerty to °^ni ch this crxitract/ 1 ease pertains. raDg i i cant has a out/ to make buyer aware of :his =erect:lease and proper farms for change of c ,ersni p must be caleted. 9. steer mules:_ Applicant snail be bound by he provisions of :he eater r nseriancy Act of isiarano: by the rules and regulations of the 3oard of eirec:.:ars of the eiszr'ct: and ill internments tneredt and supoiernents thereto and by all ether aaolicaole ',aw. LO. eper3ti ren anal ea ntefance a4r ent: AppliCaTIE seal' enter `nto an 'Operation and Maintenance Agreement' '.i t2`t the District x aer .eras and c ndi t+ons determined by the board of Directors of the District. if and when. :.'ie Board of said Oistrlct determines in its sole discretion Beat such an agreement is recutrad. Said agreesent nay contain. but snail not. be l i mi ted ea. provisions for additional annual monetary consideration far eetension of Di s ri cr delivery services and for additional aaxinistration. operation. and maintenance costs: ar ror other eases =o the District enic.'i lay arise nrourrn services mace avaiiaoie ea ere zoolkohl_ 11. !;ranee of Ise: The District reserves the exclusive eignt eo review. : eapprove ar aisaporove any pr000sed change in use of the eater allotted heret.noer. Any use other `.pan that set forth herein or any lease or sale of ere water or water ri guts allotted hereunder wi t out tee prior Ori tten approval of the Dist.' • ct snail be teethed to be material breach of this cxntractIlease. 12. ilse and a l ace hf Ilse:. Applicant agrees to use t.''ie water in the manner and on the property described in the documents 5.witted to t'ie District aL :le time this ccntrect/leaSe is executed. ar In any operation -and maintenance agreement provided by Aooi i cant. .xny use other Ian as set `firth t ereart or any lease '7r sale of one -water or water rights lerein. other than as perrittea in saragraoh d above. shall be Ceemed ea ee a material ereacn of this agreement.. 13. Title: *t ; s unoersteod and agreea thac nothing herein snall to inter retell to give ehe Applicant any ecuitaole or legal fee title interest in ar to any 'water ar water Tants referred to herein. 14. Ccnser'vat:on- applicant snail use commonly at vebted conservation aractic s with respect to theater and nater rigft.s herein. and heresy agrees to be bound by any c nservaticn Dian adopted hereafter by the District far use of District owned or controlled 'water or water ri guts . 15. R itr1r'tion$: Applicant snail restrict actual eiverstans to not exC ea the Contract/Lease exeunt. gni Cot provides eater (on the formula of one acre foot per l i i ng) for ardi narf household purposes inside ane single faun l y 3 dweiling. the watering of domestic liveste fire protection. and II Iaree the irrigation of ur -1 b.UUU Square reet ar +awl and Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well permit obtained from II :he Colorado Division of dater Resources. 4atering of livestock shall be restricted to Applicant's domestic animals not to be used far .:cmnercial IIpurposes 7 iless -lopiicantootains approval from the Colorado Division of Water Resources for commercial use/livestock watering at a norse boarding facility, provided that in no event shall actual diversions exceed the amount of water provided Dy inns antract,' Lease `laolation of :his paragraph 15 shalt be deemed to be a nater*.al treacf of :his Contract/Lease. well Qeomi t: If opl i cane intends :o divert thraugn .a well. :sen Applicant must provide to District 3 ctov cf applicant's vaiia hell permit aerare District is obligated to celiver any .rater hereunder. _7 '4,easur"n4 ' ence qr Aeter- Applicant agrees to provide. 3t its own expense. a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously aha accurately measure at 311 times all ,rater diverted pursuant to the term or Applicants grater r. got dna the term of this contract/lease. Applicant agrees tU provide accurate readings from such device or meter to District upon District's request. Applicant acKnooledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result In legal action to terminate applicant's diversion of wester by the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources. By signing this contract. Applicant hereoy soeci fi ca 1 y a 1 l ows District, through its authorized agent, to enter uvon applicant's property during •ordinary business hours for the purposes of determining applicant's actual use ar grater. 18. a r sentatnrns: 3y executing this contract/lease. Applicant agrees that ;t 's not relying cn any legal or engineering advice that ,Applicant may believe has been received rrtxm the District. Applicant further acknowledges :oat it has aotai ned all necessary ; ega l and engineering advice from .Applicant's own sources other than the District. Applicant further acknowledges that the Distr'ct.sraKes no guarantees. warranties. or assurances ..natsoever about the quantity or quality of 'Nater available pursuant to this contract/lease, Should the District ae unaol a to provide the ester contracted far herein. no damages may he assessed against the District. nor may Applicant obtain a refund from the District. 19. oosts of 'pater `Tour' chino and Augmentation anon: Should .he District. in its own discretion. choose to include .Applicant's contractllease herein in a water court filing for alternate point of diversion or plan of augmentation, then Applicant hereby agrees to pay to the District, •,mien assessed. an additional fee rept' senti ng the District's actual and reasonanle costs and fees for applicant's share of the proceedings. Applicant shall be assessed a pro - rata share of the total cost incurred by the District in preoaaring, filing and pursuing to decree the water court case. The pro -rata share shall be calculated by dividing such total cast by the numner of contracteesflessees included in the filing: TO the extent that the District is caused additional costs because of objection filed specifically due to the inclusion of AApplicant"s contract/lease in the filing. such additional costs may be charged specifically to Applicant and not Shared an a pro -rata basis by all contractees/lessees. 20. 8indinq `,grerlent: This agreement shall not be complete nor oinding soon the District unless attached hereto is the form entitled -Application and Data Form to Lease Water From ;rest Divide Water Conservancy District" ally completed by applicant and approved by the District's engineer. Said attachments shall by this reference thereto be incorporated into the terms of this agreement. All correspondence from the District to Applicant referring to or relating to this agreement is by this reference nncorparated into :his agreement as 'urtner terms and conditions of this agreement. 21. aarnnno: [T IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN A VALID WELL PERMIT OR OTHER WATER RIGHT :II ORDER TO DIVERT WATER. [NCLUOIN6 THE WATER ACQUIRED UNDER THIS MNTRACT/LEASE. IT Is THE CONTINUING DUTY OF HE APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THE 'IALIOIT! OF THE WELL PERMIT OR '.TATER RIGHT INCLUDING FILING FOR EXTENSIONS OF PERMITS. FILING WELL C IPLETI0N REPORTS. FILING STATEMENTS OF 3ENEFICIAL USE. OR OTHERWISE LAWFULLY APPLYING THE WATER TO BENEFICIAL USE ON A REGULAR BASIS WITHOUT WASTE. 4. 27. ARIA H. CORTRAGISPEASES. Tr NPR [AMT'S WELL OR OTHER Aria RIGHT OAT i5 THE SUBJECT 1F THIS r1[TRAL'TIr EASE TS LOCAL OUTSIDE 'AREA A' AS DESIGKATED SY THE DIS(RLGI . MEN MIS PARKRAMH APPLIES: THE AUGNITATATIOI WITLR imOvIOEU SY NI_ OisLit(C: until ?HIS WENN:: AT' t)lirl Y PRD'ECT APPLICAWS WATER R1QII a i(14 A GAIT (iii (WE COLORADO kt1VFR AND !NY NOT PROTECT APPLICANT FROM A CJL. FRUN ANY 01}ER SENIOR R1,1141_ ND RLPRESANTATION OTHERWISE IS 4fik 4Y FNF OISTRICr. LF FH15 1S A CONCUR 10 APNt ICANI. IH(S CON1MACTJI CASE MAY 3E RESCINDED Ifwos WRITTEN NUKE LI.LIVMRF11 rr) :ur DISTRICT UT ri APPLICANT WIil4IN THE i3EXT 30 ]An. FOLLOWING TSE AFFIXiNC .5 511 NAIU IS ow I1I15 c..10NTRAc ?1.1ME :4 WHICH WENT . t alts PAID 3Y P !C,A]1T :OR OHS CORTRAC1 /LLASF SHALI r/U E44Ff1TATELY RE!tNE TO API UCANT 11 A (r r LQRADC1 ,'111NTY i•W t',3Ri T ELD At?pllcanC_ `cregoI ng ' nstrunem 'as acznowl edged before de on �.h i s • day or lei _ �� _ J } oy r witness my hand and orflci3l sees. 4y ::marSJrt11 tsuir"S,-"- ona Nor.3n, 1�Ibt :C Atter d nearlrq ay thaw Rnard rsr Directors of the i;ett Civioe Vater :onservancy Di Lr•c:nr the 30Di1:3n. t :s nerrov f1RDERED that :ala aODlicat;ar be granted and this -cntractllease 'rta11 Or and is atcecfrrerl by It".e 1listrrrt kTTEST; Secretary Tss csantrac»'lease includes aCCOmOifiy tris contract/lease. 4ifS( i11VIfDE WATER _'ASI:31 NC( )1SIR( T 3y, 6y Dace dna is subdecc to `he terns anu cvnri1 t i pns .}T tre 1'011 rvLrty woodier' LI yin cr: 'us t !. 'tem ih7wthp 'UL:Jt,iun of point of diversion (uSe mop provided; Z. Apps $cati::r1 ant! Data Fors fully completed and ,iryie 3. 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U-uU tur 4.0U rlrt anLt..tUIr U1ILLii* Uv rx,& rtU. 1UJ..iJ0Ut WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 208670 2. Owner Name(s) : Native Springs Sub. Mailing Address % Zancanella & Assoc. PCB 1908 City, St. Zip Phone Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 (970) 945-5700 r. t Wg.LL LOCATION AS DRILLED: NW 114 NE 114 Sec. 11 Twp. 065 Range 93W DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES. 800 Vit. from North Sec. line. and 1600 ft. from East Sec. line. OR SUBDIVISION : STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION tkOUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary LOT BLOCK FILING(UNIT) DATE COMPLETED 11/01100 TOTAL DEPTH 73 ft. DEPTH COMPLETE© '3 it. 5. GEOLOGIC LOG : riegIth 6. HOLE DIAM. Cm) FROM [rtt Type of Materiai (Size, Cclor. and Type) 9.0 TO (1t 0 1 73 C04:46 04$4370 Clays, Sands Gravels, Sands 70-073 Wasatch Formation 7. PLAIN CASING 00 (in) Kind 7.0 Wail Size From (ft) To On Steel 0.240 60 PERF CASING : Screen Slot. Size 7.0 Steel 240 70 WATER LOCATED : 46 - 70 REMARKS : 11.DISINFECTION : Type : HTH 12. WELL TEST DATA : i ] Check Box tf Test Data is Submitted On Supplemental Foam TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level 24 ft. Date/Time Measured : 11/01/2000 Pumping Level : Total ft Dateflime Measured 11/0112000 r .Remarks foll rl n we mode tweet ant O b aknow oerlor~oaf, and fel they Ito W eel ►olowaduo 1 • �m Airy in Pm ■ocond dupe.Ars/ * P11+10 000 M a crw t mledfrwtSf10r.} $. Fitter P Material Size : Interval 9. Packer Pitmerne Type : Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD cement Amount asks CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drill Corp. OBox1X5C Plf 1T Type Of Print] 1 S' • Weimer Shelton / President '16 gal_ Amt. Used : irrwerai 10-24 Prromment poured Production Rate : Test Length 24.41 I 1 15 9Pm• 2 hrs. (15i } Cid • tflr Plat ry d Woo lostoloonn conrwlnls Phone : (970) 927-4182 i Date 12/05/00 IMO Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Monitoring & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR PHASE ll,V INORGANIC ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES [ 1 or NO [ 1 THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS "" PLEASE SEE INSTRUCTIONS AND EXAMPLES ON THE BACK OF THIS FORM 2222 G5,r- r L c� d t ref-' PWSID #: COUNTY: DATE COLLECTED: / 1 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: SYSTEM ADDRESS: Sprinc'a- Subdivision role Gient ccd borings, CO B1601 Su eet addr*rNPO Bele CITY CONTACT PERSON: r711 STATE PIP PHONE: '7 1 } ' - tir'4 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: -7.„.-74L-r-, - �� ! TIME COLLECTED: r=.r.1 - _ `, am/pm WATER TYPE: RAW tree CNC...0 Of Whet ,reetmMt] { 1 or CHLORINATED [ 1 or OTHER TREATMENT ( 1 SOURCE(S): LOCATIONS): - Address Well #2 County Rd. 221 SAMPLE POINT(S): Wellhead i!£i IACK OF FOFMi DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY ? YES ( 1 or NO (x1 For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line -t, CLIENT NAME or ID# LABORATORY SAMPLE # LABORATORY NAM;• ``r"-' ::c=-aoor-ctr:;r les LAB PHONE # DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY DATE ANALYZED COMMENTS Method re-Fer-encss are SI"1=-Stant ar-d PARAMETER •a,._e see ,zine, 1 1 C Methods., D-rAnnl_ta1 Soto~: of ASTM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM -- CADMIUM CHROMIUM CYANIDE FLUORIDE MERCURY NICKEL SELENIUM SODIUM THALLIUM irng111 RESULT i I. 4,10 _I 0. Jut) 0.L1O 0. 000 0. 001 1 0.000 0.000 1. 16 O. 00 00 0.000 462 0.000 1mg/I) MCL 0.006 0.05 2.0 0.004 0.005 0.1 0.2 4.0 0.002 ww 0.05 44 0.002 EPA METHOD EPA200.9 9 5M7l 14Ei SM11Zd ' EPA200. 9 EF'a200 _9 EPA200. 9 SM45OOE SM45O0C SM71 122 r F' Fi 2 0 0. 4 D33 997A SM71 1 1 E+ EF'A2O0 . 'a BOL - 1rWic•lra Ihae the carnpaa3d rem r4Ny*.d far, INA real b :ow She Lala MOL NT . Noe Tarred fo' Canapevd malt - MIalgrarne par Liver MCL - Maxirtxrn ComrnirseRot L. MOL - Lobo/mg vfy Mee fyq 04+•414.43 L.nxt • Director-, Grand trrlglli Lab MDL 0.001 0777E- 0.02 .eC:'O11 0.0' 0. 001 o. ill:lil^ 0.001 0.00'" 0.01 0.00005 • 0 0 0.1 t i . {:x`11 Date Analyzed: 1/3/01 12/13/00 12/27/00 12/22/00 12/20/00 12/21/00 11/11/00 11/9/00 11/9/00 1/3/01 12/29/00 11/16/00 1/2/01 • - NOT an MCL, "Action Level' • • - NOT an MCL, "Morxtering Requrerner 1 Orgy' H • Molding tun• has berl axce•d•d Jct. Lab Reviewed & Approved by Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment" WQCO-CMDM-B2. 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Oenve,, CO 80246-1530 Revised 12199 - J:IWPLLABEORMS1iNORGAN,FRM 1 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Monitoring & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATEINITRITE as NITROGEN ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES [ ] or NO [ X 1 THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS 1 ***" INSTRUCTIQNSIDEFINITIONS ON BACK OF FORM*"" PWSID # N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED 11/ 2 / 00 1 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Native Spring Subdivision SYSTEM ADDRESS: clo Zancanella & Assoc. 1005 C000er Ave., Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1 Street address/P.O. Box City State Zip CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970) 945-5700 1 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Jeremy Caste TIME COLLECTED: 2:30 sm/pm • WATER TYPE: [ X ] RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) or CHLORINATED [ j or OTHER TREATMENT [ ] I SOURCE(S): I Weil #2 / County Rd. 221 / Wellhead (SEE BACK OF FORM) DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IFor Laboratory Use Only Below This Lane LOCATION(S): - Address SAMPLE POINT(S): =-,=., I LABORATORY SAMPLE #INAME car ID # Grand Jct. Lab or atCLc�riENTes 970 242-7618 LABORATORY NAME LAB PHONE # { ] .T / I.0 below ' DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 11/ / 1 DATE ANALYZED / / MM COMMENTS Cthod from "Annual Book of ASTM Standards." I(mg/L) (mg/LI) - EPA (mg/L1) PARAMETER RESULT MCI METHOD LAB MDL 1 NITRATEINITRITE-N ' 1 -59 10.0 D3867909 U. 01 11 /B/O0 t -} NITRATE -N 1. . 01 01 10.0 D3967909 O, 01 11/9/00 NITRITE -N 1.0 D.3867909 0.01 11./7/00 I P BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDG. -Date...- Analyzed: 1 Director, Grand Jct. Lab Reviewed & Approved by - . Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-CMDM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 NT = Not Tested for compound. mgIL = Milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H = Holding Time has been exceeded 12/ 20/ 00 L BCRATCRY 3 AACIAI1ON SERVICES US MAIL WATER a 10 LOWRY BOULEVARD PO BOX 17123 DENVER. CQ 30220 92s DENVER. CO 90217 BACTERIOLOGY SAMPLE INFORMATION: 0 COMMLIMFTY -NON -COMMUNITY 0 PRNATE 0 ROUTINE `"RAW 0 REPEAT FOR THE MONTH OF PWS 10 JEF5PECIAL PURPOSE 0 FINISHED 47) 4) rtTY COUNTY NAMAE OF SYSTEM iOGRESS CHLORINE PASIDuA. ORDERED BY: {SAMPLE MAY NOT 3E TESTED JF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT PROvtOE.D) FEE STAMP LAB 106 (071971 ?NONE Nov3€1000,I282 DATE TIME BY COLLEC•rED ///v-31/00 JC . � j I 0 Am RECEIVED f 0 Pm RESULTS: SEE REVERSEFOR EXPLANATION TOTAL CONFORM C PRESENT ABSENT MOST PROBABLE NO NAME ADDRESS CITY: STATE/ZIP TEST ORDERED -STD SACT. 0 OTHER 1 10 DENVER ANALYST OUFORM/1COAL GPO JCT. I rm No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER S-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg.. 1313 Sherman St.. Denver. Colorado a0203 (303)366-3581 1 lap! ICANT 1 1 1 PAUL 3 .3, JIM E LUGINBUHL P 0 BOX 950 BASAL'. CO 31521- LlC WELL PERMIT NUMBER DIV. 5 ND 45 DES. BASIN MG F ' Block:;ling: Succor NA'EVE SPRINGS AP0P.O /ED L LOCATION GARFiELD CC;L:N T Y NW 114 NE 1/4 Section 11 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES ,FRCM SECTION LINES 1050 Ft. from North Section Line (970) 927-4585 2050 Ft, from East Section Line ERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well snail be used in such a way as to cause no material iniur, to existing water rignts. The issuance of this permit does not assure the acrolicant that no injury will occur to another vested water nght or preclude another owner of a vested water -fight from seeking reiiet in a civil court action. ' 2) The construction of :ries well snail oe ;n cornoliance with to Water' Neil Construction Rules 2 ::CR 402-2. unless approval of a variance has oeen granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 13. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-1372) for :he construction of a well. acprconating ground water tributary to the Colorado I River, as an alternate coint of diversion to the Avalancne Canai and Siphon. on the condition that the well shall be operated only wnen the West Divide 'Nater Conservancy Cistnct's substitute water supply pian, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or uncer an approved plan 'dr augmentation. WDWCD contract ;.000906F.1L(a). 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two single family dwellings. the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount -of grounds water -to -be -appropriated small -not -exceed 0.35 acre-foot (277.000 gallons). ... . 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case numbers) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be instatled on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at !east annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon 1 1 1 request. t'y'trat623 APPROVED KJW ,Receipt No. 0466045A State Engineer ; DATE ISSUED NOV GHQ EXPIRAT)ON'dATE N u 1' 441 arm No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER•WS-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES S18 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman SL, Denver, Colorado 60203 (303)866-3581 1 Pai_°CANT 1 1 (970) 927—!'585 PAUL 3 & JIM E LUGINBUHL P 0 BOX 950 BASALT. CO 51621 - LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 054.919 F DIV. 5 WD 5 DES. BASIN IMO Lit: 2 Block: FIiirg: S&cciv: NATIVE SP4lNGS .4PPRCVED WELL L CCATICN GARFiELD COUNTY NW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 11 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth. P.M. DISTANCES FROM SEC' -ION LINES 800 Ft. from North 1790 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WFLL ISSUANCE OF THiS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this pen -nit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested mater right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of ,his well snail oe in compliance with me 'Neter :Veil ConstrLic:ion Rules 2 OCR 402-2. unless approval of a variance nes 'peen granted by the State 9oard of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Rump InstalIation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18, ?) ,Approved pursuant :o CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado II River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal ana Sipnon, on the condition that the well shall be operated only wnen the West Civide Water Conservancy Distnct's substitute water supply plan. approved by the State Engineer. is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the 1 release of replacement water from Rued Reservoir is in effect. or uncer an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract 700906PJL(a). A) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary housencid purposes inside two single family dwellings. the II irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water aitotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. II66y The average annuaramaurrrof-ground-watertarbe-acprropriated shall not-exceed.0.85 acre-foot (277,000 gallons); - 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flaw meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. KtA) U/I6f 7 1 1 1 i 1 APPROVED KJW Receipt No. 0466045B za ,4 State Engineer DATE ISSUED M l\I 1 2000 By �. EXPIRATION DATE • crm No. WS -25 1 IFF")1_'C aNT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 313 Centennial Bldg.. 1313 Sherman St.. Denver. Caiorado 30203 (303)366-3581 PAUL S & JIM E LUGINBUHL R 0 BOX 950 BASAL a , CO 81621- (970) 927-4585 PERRAIT T O CONSTRUCT A WELL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER C 54 920 _ F DIV. 5 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 3 Slack: Filing: Su❑aiv' NATIVE SPRINGS AFFgCVED `NEL 1: "_OCAT ICN GARFELD COUNTY NW 1;4 NE 1/4 Section 11 T ownsnlo 6 5 Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 500 F. from North 2050 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the apolicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well snail be ,n cvmoliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 OCR 402-2. unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Weil Construction and Purno Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for :he construction of a well, aporccnaung ground water tributary to the Colorado River. as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the conaition that the well shall be operated only when the West DivraeWater Conservancy District's substitute water suopry plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West (Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Rued Reservoir is in effect. or under an approved plan for augmentation. WOWCD contract ]00906PJL(a). 4) The use of grouna water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two single family dwellings, the irrigation of not mare than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns. and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) --The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.85 acre -foot -(27000 -gallons). 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the Location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flaw meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. ,LAJ'$t'i'� J APPROVED KJW 1 t, eceiot No. 0466045C State Engineer .44.70" DATE ISSUED N C t'! 1 6 2000 E:CP1RATION DATE i +._ f 1 3 2:: MI rm No. OFFICE. OF THE STATE ENGINEER IW5-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 813 Centennial Bldg.. 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 30203 (303) 88a-3581 1 1 1 PAUL 3 & .;IM E L UGINBUHL P 0 BCX 950 BASALT. GG 81621- 1 (97 0) 927--1585 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 054021 F C1V. 5 'ND 45 DES. BASIN MO Block: Filing: Succor NATIVE SPRINGS AP010,C`V— WEL LCCA7CN GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1.2. NE 1/4 Section 11 Townsnio 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES =RCM SECTION LINES 250 =t. from North 2050 Ft. rorty East Section Line Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right rom seexing relief in a civil court action.. The ccrstruc::on of this 'Nell snail be :n cornciiance with the 'Nater Well Construct cn Rules 2 OCR 402.2. unless approval of a vanance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water 'Neil Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 13. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, aoprocnating ground Nater tributary to the Colorado River. as an alternate paint of diversion to :he Avatancne Canal and Siphon, on :he condition that the well shall be operated only wnen tre West Divide Water Conservancy Districr s substitute water supply pian, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the welt owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District far the release or replacement water from Rued Reservoir is in effect, or under an aaproved plan for augmentation. WDINCC contract C0906PJL(a). I a) The use of ground water from this Weil is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two single family dwellings, :he irngauon of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) -The-average annual amount of ground water to be appropriatedishail-notexceed.4.35 acre-fooL(277,000 gallans)� _ . 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 6) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. APPROVED KJ W 74.14 2 State Engineer Receipt No. 04660450 DATE ISSUED NOV 16 2'(300 a y� B EXPIRATION DATE 20 1 Form No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER iG1VS25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Stag., 1313 Sherman St.. Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 366-3581 1 IFI:DLICANT 1 1 PAUL 3 &. JIM E i. UGINBUHL P 0 BOX 950 BASALT. CO 81621- (970) 927-4585 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER C.54322 .. F DIV. 5 WC 4.5 DES. BASIN ,GI❑ _d[: 3 Block: ding: Succiv: NATNE SPRINGS APoRC\IED WELL L^C. r"CN GARFIELD COUNTY SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 2 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SEC70N LINES 225 Ft. from South 1700 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested Hater nght from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 OCR 402-2. unless approval of a variance has been granted by :he State Board cf Examiners of Water `Veil Construction aha Puma Installation Contractors ,n accordance with Rule 18. 3; Approved pursuant to CRS 37-70-137(2) for the construction of a well, a procnating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, as an alternate point of civersion to the Avalancne Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well snail be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect. or under an approved plan for augmentation. WOWCD contract TC00906PJL(a). :) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary Household purposes inside rnro single family dwellings. the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns. and the watenng of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) Theaverage annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.85 acre-foot (277,000 gallons). 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified an this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained ay the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. a 1114/40 APPROVED KJW I`Receipt No. 0466045E ..• State Engineer ga, 4110, DATE ISSUED NOV 1 6 2000 6yEXPIRATION DATE 11`' 1 1 arm No. WS -25 PPUCANT 1 1 1 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 318 Centennial 31dg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver. Colorado 80203 (303)866-3581 PAUL, 3 & JIM E LUCINBUHL P o acx 950 BASALT. CO 31621- (970) 162? - (970) 927-4585 inERMIT TO CONSTaf ICT A WF! 1 LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 054923 F DIV. 5 'AVD 45 DES. BASIN MD _ct: 3 3lcck: = ling: Succov: NATIVE SPRINGS aP1PRC' ED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 2 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 225 Ft. from South 1950 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or prec,ude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a evil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the 'Neter Well Construction Rules 2. COR 102-2, unless approval of a variance has een granted by :he State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pum❑ Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well snail be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy Cistnct's substitute water supply plan, aparoveo by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District far the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract Jfl0906PJL(a). The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount of ground water torbe appropriated shall -not exceed 0.85 -acre-foot (277,000 gallons). 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well ,permit number(s), name or the aquifer, and court case numbers? as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified an this permit. 9) A totalizing flow rneter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Remanent records of all. diversions m st be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. lt/,l �Uv , ((ff e] 7 APPROVED KJW 1 (Receipt No. 644%045F ."4// ! DATE ISSUED NOV 'U 2000 $yEXPIRA N DATE L.{State Engineer "On, ) 1 arm No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER WS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Cantennial &8g., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303)866-33581 ppT 1 1 PAUL 3 & JIM E LUGINBUHL P 0 BOX 950 BASALT. CO 81621- (970) 927-4585 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL UC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 054924 _ F DIV. 5 WO 45 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 7 3Iocx: Ring: Suadiv:. NATIVE SPRINGS APPROVED ,iVE 1 OCATICN GARFIEL D COUNTY SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 2 Township 6 3 Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 225 Ft. from South Section Line 2250 Ft. Pram East Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ©OES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material iniury to existing water nghts, The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no ingury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water night from seeking relies in a civil court action, The construction Of 'his well scall be in Compliance with the Construction Rules 2 ::CR-tQ2-2. unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State 1 Spam of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. A.oproved pursuant to CRS 37-g0-137(2) for the construction of aNell, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado l 3) River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalancne Canal and Sipnon, on the condition that the well snail be operated only wnen the West Divide Water Conservancy Oistnct's substitute water supply plan, aocroved by the State Engineer. is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the well owner Dna the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Rued Reservoir is in affect. or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract rtC40906P.;La}. t} The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary housencid purposes inside MO single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens ane lawns. and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well snail not exceed 15 GPM. 6). The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.85 acre-foot (277,000 gallons). - - - 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer. and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. iI/ii # } 1 /1 / APPROVED :LG 1 `r` KJ W State Engineer `Receipt No, 0466045G DATE ISSUED NO d-rille/40 IV By EXPIRATIOr DATE oft et r -ormNo. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER IWS-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 30203 (303) 866-3581 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P PT PAUL 3 8, JIM E LLGINBUHL P 0 BCX 950 BASALT. CO 81621- (970) 9274585 acD"IT TO CONSTPIJCT A WELI LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 054325 F DIV. 5 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD Lac 3 BIoCK: Filing: Suatliv: NATiVE SPRINGS APPROVED `NELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1;4 NE 1/4 Section 11 Township 6 5 Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 250 Ft. from North 2275 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material inFury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) the construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Weil Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless aoproval of a vanance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water 'Nell Construction and Pump installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18, 3) Approved pursuant :a CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon. an the conaftion that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect. or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCC contract-000906PJL(a). 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary housenold purposes inside Nye) single family dwellings. the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns. and the watenng of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.85 acre-foot (277,000 gallons). - 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed an this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. APPROVED KJW Receipt No. 0466045H Ji State 'enlline'err`` T e �} DATE ISSUED �Q4 1 6 LUU3 ; /:(1/b/ Bycif+ �. EXPIRATIC DATE NU�1 I t] r' J torn No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER It -WS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial 81dg., 1313 Sherman 5t.. Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 1 Pc" ANT 1 1 1 PAUL 3 & JIM E LUG1NBUHL P080X950 BASALT, CO 81621- (970) 927-4585 ERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 054926 - F DIV. 5 WO 45 DES. BASIN MD Lot 9 Blccx: ;ling: ucdty: NATIVE SPRINGS APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 11 Township 8 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 500 Ft. from North 2275 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested I water ngnt from seeking relief in a civil court action.. 1Y) The construction ar :tis well shall be .n =radiance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance nas been granted by the State 3oard or Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. i 3) Approved vursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon. on the condition that the well snail be operated only wnen the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan. approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy Distract for the release of replacement water from RuedReservoir is in effect. or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract 000906r JL(a). 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two single family dwellings. the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and fawns. and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect, 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount -of -ground waterto be -appropriated -shall not exceed 0.05 -acre-foot (277,000 gallons): — — 7) The owner shall marls the wed in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by ttie well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. tyiro/a APPROVED i 1 rl f/ f KJW State EngineerI By I Receiot No. 04660451 i DATE ISSUED NOV iRAT1 DATE .1 4 1 rm Na. OFFICE.OF THE STATE ENGINEER 5-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St.. Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 pl.ICAN T 1 1 1 PAUL 3 & JIM E LUGINBUHL P 0 BOX 950 BASALT. CO 81621- (970) 927-4585 r' RMIT TO CONcTRt tCT A WELL LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER C54927 - F DIV. 5 WD 45 DES. BASIN MD _ct: 'O 31ock Suociv: NATIVE SPRINGS .APC CVPD '4VELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4. NE 1/4 Section 11 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCE'S FROM SEC T ION LINES 800 Ft. from North Section Line Section Line 2275 Ft. from East ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water rignt or preclude another owner of a vested water ngnt from seeking relief in a civil court action. ") The Construction of this well shall be in comoliance with the Water Weil Construction Rules 2 OCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance :gas been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water `Nell Construction and Pump Installation Contractors on accordance with Rule 18. Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well. appropriating ground ^nater tributary to the Colorado River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer. is in effect. and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of reolacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract 000906PJL(a). The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary housenold purposes inside two single family dwellings. the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns. and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. ) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.85 acre-foot (277,000 gallons). - - - - ) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. ? This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. [`1r'((f/�11 PPROVED KJW Receiot No. 0466045J jj 1 State Engineer DATE ISSUED NOV 1 6 MOO EXPIRATION DATE i 1 ,,t 1 arm No. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER WS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 IPPLICANT 1 1 1 PAUL B & JIM E LUGINBUHL P 0 BOX 950 BASALT, CO 81621- (970) 927-4585 rERMiT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER OE4S2S F DIV. 5 WO 45 DES. BASIN MD J Lot: 11 Black: Filing: Sucdiv: NATIVE SPRINGS APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 11 Township 6 S Range 93 W Sixth F.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1050 Ft. from North 2275 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. The constrt:c:ion of this well shall be in comoiiance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless aooroval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of 'Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in acccraance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for :he construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated oniy when the West Divide Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect, and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. W0WCD contract 700906PJL(a). The use of grouna water from this well is limited to ordinary housenold purposes inside two single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns. and the watering of domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well snail not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average -annual amount of ground water to_ be appropriated.shall not exceed 0.85 acre-foot (277,000 gallons). 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shad take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 3) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 9) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in goad working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request..� APPROVED KJW Receipt No. 0466045K 1j aa7A/'' State Engineer NOV 2i100 $y DATE ISSUED EXPIRATI PATE ;' L+' s 1 ENGINEERING REPORT WATER REPORT NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION The Native Springs Subdivision will be served by individual water wells. The individual water demand of the subdivision will be typical of a single-family residential community. Each single- family lot can be expected to demand approximately 420 gallons/day based on a 3.5 persons/residence occupa • + 'th the addit' • -: ory dwelling the demand will increase approximate) 00 gallanslda +ased t 5 persons/AD The total demand for a lot with an ADU would b • - 720 gallon • : -- +ual lot owners will be responsible for well drilling, water treatment and maintenance. Please reference the enclosed Native Springs Subdivision Water Supply letter prepared by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. The option of a central water system was considered as an alternative, and determined to be too expensive to install and maintain. We are proposing in the protective covenants that each individual lot be required to install a fire protection sprinkler system. The sprinkler systems should provide suppression of a fire before emergency vehicles would arrive on the scene. Also, three 10.000 -gallon fire protection water storage tanks are to be located within the center of the proposed cul-de-sac. The tanks would be filled by the irrigation line during irrigation season, and by water hauled by truck during non - irrigation season or if the irrigation line is not useable. The 30,000 -gallon fire storage water could be utilized to help fight a structure or open space tire. Irrigation water shall be delivered via a buried pipe to all individual lots. The existing irrigation ditch that is located on the northwest corner of the property shall supply the proposed irrigation system. ISDS PLAN INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC DISSPOSAL SYSTEM PLAN NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION A letter was received from John Schenk of the Cottonwood Springs Mobile Home Park, located to the southwest of the proposed subdivision. This letter indicated that current capacity of the sewage treatment system at Cottonwood Springs would not allow additional service from the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The letter is attached for reference. The Native Springs Subdivision will be served by Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS). The sewage generated by the subdivision will be typical of a single-family residential community. Each single family lot can be expected to generate approximately 350 gallons/day based on a 3.5 persons/residence occupancy rate. For lots with arLacc.e,ssary.slwelling unit the sewage generated would increas ga ons/ day, based on 2.5 perso Isn AD ndividual lot owners will be responsible for the installation of an ISDS designedy a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado. Maintenance of each system will be the responsibility of the individual lot owner and as outlined in the protective covenants of the subdivision. per'4 ° \"%i 4�G�TEi;'0 'Ji • • rrf 1' OFEsS\� '' OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ISDS A. Responsibility: The owner and the party in possession of real property upon which an individual sewage disposal system is used, shall be jointly and severally responsible for operation and maintenance of the system unless jurisdiction for responsibility has been transferred to a public, quasi -public, or political subdivision. The person denying such responsibility shall bear the burden of proof for such denial upon establishment of ownership or possessory rights in the property served by the system. B. Service Label: For treatment plants utilizing mechanical apparatus or under a service policy, a clearly visible, permanently attached label or plate giving instructions for obtaining service shall be placed at a conspicuous location. C. Maintenance and Cleani : When directed by the local health department, for the purpose of obtaining compliance with rules and regulations, the owner or user of a system shall provide for maintenance and cleaning of an individual sewage disposal system and shall notify the local health department upon completion of any maintenance work and report to said department and submit such evidence of compliance with any maintenance and cleaning schedule in the form and as the department requires. 1. The local board of health may adopt rules and regulations for the scheduling of maintenance and cleaning of systems and practices adequate to insure proper functioning of acceptable systems, and may require proof of proper maintenance and cleaning, pursuant to any such schedules and practices, to be submitted periodically to the local department of health by the owner of the system. D. Monitoring and Sampling: 1. Reasonable periodic collection and testing by the local health department of effluent samples from individual sewage disposal systems for which monitoring of effluent is necessary in order to insure compliance with the provisions of rules and regulations may be performed not more than two times a year, except when required by the health officer in conjunction with an enforcement action. 2. Any owner or occupant of property on which an individual sewage disposal system is located may request the local health department to collect and test an effluent sample from the system. The local health department may perform such collection and testing services. 3. If the local health department collects and tests effluent samples, a fee not to exceed that which is allowed by 25-10-101 et. seq. (as amended) C.R.S. 1973, may be charged for each sample collected and tested. Payment of such charge may be stated in the permit as a condition for its continued use. E. Disposal of Waste Materials: Disposal of waste materials removed from a system in the process of maintenance or leaning shall be accomplished at a site approved by local county officials in a manner which does not create a hazard to the public health, a nuisance or an undue risk of pollution and which complies with state and local rules and regulations. (See Sludge Regulations and Solid Waste Regulations.) F. No Discharge is Permitted Which Does not Comply With Rules and Regulations: No sewage or effluent shall be permitted to be discharged into or upon the surface of the ground or into state waters unless the sewage system and effluent meets the minimum requirements of applicable rules and regulations. G. Termination of Use of System: The contents of a septic tank, vault, or seepage pit, the use of which has been terminated, shall be properly disposed of whereupon the emptied tank, vault, or pit shall be filled with soil or rock, or the health officer may require the tank or vault to be removed and disposed of properly. SCHENK, KERST & deWlNTER, LLP A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOHN R. SCHENK DAN KERST WILLIAM J. dcWINTER,111 C.AROL1 M. STRALTMA.N Ronald B. Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 303 EIGHTH STREET. SUITE 310 GLENV400D SPRINGS, COLORADO 51601 TELEPHONE: 1970) 945-2447 TELECQPIER: 1970)9454767 April 17, 2001 Re: Native Springs Subdivision/Request for Wastewater Treatment Service Dear Mr. Liston: This letter responds to your letter dated March 25, 2001, inquiring on potential wastewater treatment services for the Native Springs Subdivision located on County Road 221. The wastewater system used by Cottonwood Springs Mobile Home Park is now owned and operated by Waste Water Treatment Services. LLC. We represent and can speak for that entity. That wastewater treatment system is fully committed to providing wastewater treatment services to the Cottonwood Springs Mobile Home Park, Rifle Service Park and Powerline Professional Park. The present plant capacity limits wi 1 not allow the inclusion of any additional users. Therefore, no wastewater treatment services are a ailable for your client. If I can provide any further information, please contact me. JRSfclh cc: Tom Triplat (wfenc.) Very JO ly yours, TRAFFIC REPORT ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATION NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION Below are the calculations to determine the average daily traffic volume that can be expected to be generated at build out of the Roaring Fork Preserve: Number of Primary Residences: 11 Number of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU): 11 Number of Vehicles per Day generated by single-family detached residential per ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition: 9.57, Use 10 (11 Primary Residence + 11 ADU) x 10 trips/day/residence = 220 ADT Based on the Capital Improvements Plan as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners the Native Springs Subdivision is located in an impact fee related area, Off- site Road Impact Study Area 4. DRAINAGE REPORT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DRAINAGE STUDY FOR THE NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO HCE JOB NUMBER: 2000056.01 April 27, 2000 Prepared for: Jim and Paul Luginbulil PO Box 950 Basalt, CO 81621 Prepared by: Eric P. Tuin, E.I. Design Engineer . iJ NI•er Dr +.` ► e, II.•I"-Fr ;Principal Enginet ,/11 t 'rrESSV-'�' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 OFF-SITE BASINS 1 HYDROLOGY 1 DRAINAGE PLAN 1 SUMMARY 1 DRAWINGS: Vicinity Map 8-1/2" x 11" S.C.S. Map 8-1/2" x 11" Grading and Drainage Plan 11"x 17" APPENDIX: Calculations for existing and proposed conditions INTRODUCTION The proposed Native Springs Subdivision is located in Garfield County, approximately two miles east of Rifle. The property is north of County Road 221 and south of County Road 210. Undeveloped and partially developed agricultural/ residential land surrounds the site. The proposed 65.96 -acre development consists of 11 residential lots with 11 accessory dwelling units. Please see the enclosed map for the site location. MAJOR OFF-SITE BASINS The major drainage basin near this project with an established 100 -year floodplain is the Colorado River, which flows to the south of the site, south of Highway 6 & 24. The river is approximately one mile to the south of the site and 80' in elevation below the proposed development. The Colorado River's floodplain has not been established by FEMA for this area. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the Soil Conservation Service publication Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado (1980) and TR -55. Peak on-site flows in this area will be derived primarily from rainfall since the site is below 8000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the proposed drainage improvements should be adequate to handle on-site spring snowmelt runoff. DRAINAGE PLAN The storm water runoff from this site will be, in general, unconcentrated sheet flow on the proposed lots and runoff from the road, which will be captured by roadside swales. The 25 and 100 -year flows for the existing and proposed conditions are provided in the Appendix. Runoff from the lots will in some cases tlow to irrigation ditches as it has historically. Detention will not be required on this site because of the small amount of development that will occur on site versus the large open areas that will be left as pasture. The addition of lawns to each of the lots will also offset any impact created by the construction of roofs and driveways. Grading around proposed buildings should provide positive drainage away from the buildings. Please see the drainage and grading plan submitted with the Preliminary Plan application for additional information. There are two ditches that exist on the site. The Lower Cactus Valley Ditch is located just south of County Road 210 and passes through the northwesterly portion of the site. The Grand Valley River Ditch Company Ditch flows along the easterly and southerly boundary of the site and into a culvert that crosses County Road 221. These ditches will not be changed by the proposed development and easements will be established for each of the ditches. There also exists some lateral ditches that cross the site to irrigate the existing pasture. These ditches will be rerouted to provide irrigation to the proposed lots and maintain irrigation to the existing irrigated portion of the site. SUMMARY There will not be an increase in runoff due to the development for the Native Springs site. All the drainage improvements proposed for the subdivision are designed to mitigate the adverse impacts on the site and surrounding areas. APPENDIX 1 1 1 154.3:. ( i rat1ef Paris • 5?4C - 51; - -- --- D —0-}, _ � I 1 COUNTY RD 221 10 51L 1 0 e • RAz)( 323+ ;7:1717: 1411011 COUNTRY ENGINEERING. NC. 923 COOPER AVENUE SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE: (970) 945-8676 FAX: (970) 945-2555 JIM ANO PAUL LUGINBUHL GARFIELD COUNTY, CO NATIVE SPEWS B B MEION VICNTY MAP ti 1" = 1000' ( • ATE 7.0. INS—EPT DES. EPT CK. DR. SLS DATE 03/08/01 FILE NO. 2000056.01 SHEET 1 SOIL TYPES 30: HELDT, CLAY LOAM, (6-127. SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, SLOW PERMEABILITY) 40: KIM, LOAM (3-6% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY) 67: TORRIORTHENTS, ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX (15-70% SLOPE, SHALLOW TO MODERATELY DEEP) HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 COOPER AVENUE NWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PHONE: (970) 945-8876 FAX: (970) 945-2555 JIM AND PAUL LUGINBUHL GARFIELD COUNTY, CO NATIVE SPRINKs4 SUBDIVISION SCS MAP 1" = 1000' INS—EPT DES. EPT CK. DR. SLS DATE 03/08/01 FILE NO. 2000056.01 SHEET EX ALL. txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - EXISTING`, CONDITIONS 25 YEAR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 65.99 as Peak Time 12.4 hrs Peak Flaw 10.9 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea DOS Subareas Area Description (ac) CN TO Tt Rainfall (hrs) (hrs) (in) SITE 65.99 72 0.4 0.0 2.00 Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number TYPE B 48.69 69 TYPE C 17.30 79 Total Area 65.99 72 < Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4 hrs in row <1]. **************************rr************t*******************r******************** TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION -- EXISTING CONDITIONS 100 YEAR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 65.99 ac Peak Time 12.4 hrs Peak Flow 21.9 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) SITE 65.99 72 0.4 0.0 2.40 Subarea Name: SITE, Row: 1 Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number TYPE H 48.69 69 TYPE C 17.30 79 Total Area > 65.99 72 < Weighted CN Messages: Page 1 FR ALL.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 25 YEAR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 66.00 ac Peak Time 12.4 hrs Peak Flow 9.1 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area Description (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (hrs) (hrs) (in) SITE 66.00 71 0.4 0.0 2.00 Support Data: Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number IMPERVIOUS 3.70 98 LAWN 1.01 61 NATURAL 61.29 69 Total Area > 66.00 71 < Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4 hrs in row CI>. TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 100 YEAR Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 66.00 ac Peak Time 12.4 hrs Peak Flow 19.0 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea Description D/S Subareas Area (ac) CN To Tt Rainfall (hrs) (hrs) (in) SITE 66.00 71 0.4 0.0 2.40 Support Data: Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number IMPERVIOUS 3.70 98 LAWN 1.01 61 Page 1 PR ALL . txt NATURAL 61.29 69 Total Area > 66.00 71 < Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4 hrs in row <1>. Page 2 ti f/f -y--r.1--te �1 I� ----Y f— e— r %/ "c /,- — /4/ IV 'V/ f � f�~fir. oY `\mss r w/////,/ /�JJ,`i,. v, f �z ,-, i fj�es4;,�// �[ s /,� ifir//ffr r '/- L i,,f/,-','f' 77/r 7 / 4/ - A / f -',.// ///e ,-- // / ///e / e r� ▪ //// / '.f/// / e /( i J/ .- ei�ef e Aiiii% (kW AtkiNtri :# D �` r r s,,,� \` 17,,E414 DAJAS ¢{4 K CS \ N` \L-:::::4*-:‘,:- `�E\TK,Et `�O oNEC]�ITpf N.rtEwrro wT sTE aeossFrc ` wo erx�nTa LATERAL \ c.asc=NEE N N N \ I/ C1T5+Mt TO, L TER tO f?�her0+dDP,FD INSTALL sED1(FNT CONTROL wax 117, srST,ui 807,1.J.2."+n w -E7 rm [;)C N0 Ea4- ,..rams `\ ss>, GRAPHIC SCALE ( DO FELT 11 @ E t h 106 0. SEE CC 1STT7UC1O11 NOTES ON 51-+EET 5 CT vC 2000056.01 VEGETATION REPORT Native Springs Subdivision Final Report Prepared by: Beach Environmental, LLC Aspen, Colorado 81611 November, 2000 Parcel Description Native Springs Subdivision is a 65.9 acre tract located on County Roads 221 and 210 approximately 2 miles east of Rifle Colorado. The proposed subdivision consists of eleven lots ranging from 5.02 - 6.80 acres. A road, Native Springs Lane, is proposed for the center of the subdivision. The property is primarily irrigated hay fields, including pasture grasses common to this area with some willow and shrubs along ditch courses. Wetlands were identified in two areas of the proposed subdivision on Lots 9 and 11, but these wetlands are not within the proposed area of development. Field Observations South Boundary: The southwest corner of the Native Springs Subdivision supports a wetland area consisting of a prominent cattail and Canary Reed grass population that extends approximately 200 feet along County Road 221 through Lot 11. This area has been disturbed by county mowing activities on the right-of-way (ROW). Continuing eastward along the south boundary, there is an irrigation ditch with a capacity of 4-5 cfs. Vegetation present in this area includes Russian Olive, native pasture grasses, and weeds. East Boundary: The eastern portion of the Native Springs Subdivision does not support any wetland areas. Lots 1,2,3,4, & 5 are primarily irrigated hay fields. A few willow trees were noted, but do not appear to be thriving. A recent addition of a gated irrigation pipe has likely decreased the soil moisture in the area, and thus contribute to the lack of willows in the area. An irrigation ditch lateral runs through Lot 2 and along the eastern boundary, but does not constitute wetland areas. North Boundary: The northern portion of the Native Springs Subdivision does not support any wetland areas. Lots 5, 6, & 7 are primarily irrigated hay fields. A two foot irrigation ditch runs between the Northern boundary and the County roads, but does not constitute a wetland area. Western Boundary: The western portion of the Native Springs Subdivision supports a wetland area consisting of wetland grasses that extends approximately 150 linear feet through Lot 9, immediately adjacent to the irrigation ditch lateral. An old small irrigation ditch located inside the fence line appears to have a small leakage flow from the main ditch along County Road 210 contributing to the wetness in this area. Beach Environmental, LLC Native Springs Subdivision 2 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations Two wetland areas were identified on the Native Springs Subdivision, a cattail population on the Southwest boundary through Lot 1.1 and wetland grasses on the western boundary along the irrigation lateral through Lot 9. Neither of these wetland areas are within the proposed road or building envelopes. The areas have been marked on the enclosed map and avoidance of these areas by all construction activities is recommended. Any development or proposed dredge and fill impact to these areas would require permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Numerous photos of the Native Springs Subdivision were taken using a digital camera and are on file in our office for review. Since the present proposal to develop this property does not encroach upon or require the alteration of any wetland areas, no further assessment of this property for wetland impacts is recommended. Should the site plan be revised on or updated, a new identification or delineation of wetlands should be completed. End of Report. 0257r.01 Beach Environmental, LLC Native Springs Subdivision 3 GEO TECHNICAL REPOR T Gtech Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970.945-3454 hppo@hpgeotech.com PRELIMINARY GEOTECINZCA.L STUDY PROPOSED NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION COUNTY ROAD 221 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 100 460 JANUARY 16, 2001 PREPARED FOR: .JIM AND PAUL LUGINBUBL P.O. BOX 950 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECIiNMCAL, Ii`riC. January 16, 2001 Jur: and Paul Luginbuhl P.O. Box 950 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Job No. 100 460 Subject: Report Transmirtal. Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Proposed Native Springs Subdivision, County Road 221, Garfield County, Colorado. Gentlemen: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical study for the proposed development. The property is suitable for the proposed development based on geologic conditions. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the general proposed building areas, below 11/2 and 2 feet of topsoil, consist of stratified sand, silt and clay. Dense river gravel deposits were encountered at depths of 33 and 45 feet in t%vo of the borings. Groundwater vas typically encountered at a depth of about 10 feet at the time of drilling. The water level could be as shallow as 5 to 7 feet in some areas. Spread footings placed on the upper natural soils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 psf to 1,500 psf appear suitable for building support. The footing bearing level should be kept relatively shallow to avoid groundwater and soft soil impacts. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations suitable for planning and preliminary design. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical, recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Rev. by: DEH SLP/rsofksw pLRi AND s(i TABLE OF CONTENTS PE OF STUDY PR: 1.) IIOPMENT SITE cONDITIONS (iF01.)( ;IC SETTivi HELD EXPLORATION SUBSLRFACE CONDITIONS 4 GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECONINIENDATIONS 6 l'OUNDATIoNS ...... FLOOR SLABS 7 UNDERDRAIN SYSTENI SITE GRADING St:RP:10E DRAINAGE PERCOLATION TESTING LIMITATIONS REFERENCES 10 FIGURE 1 - GEOLOGY MAP AND BORING LOCATIONS FIGURES 2 & 3 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 4 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 5 & 6 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE 11 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed Native Springs Subdivision, County Road 221, Garfield County. Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the geologic and subsurface conditions and their potential impacts on the project. The study- was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Jim and Paul Luginbuhi, dated May 14, 2000. We previously conducted a radiation survey of the property and presented our findings in a report dated June 7, 2000, Job No. 100 460. A field exploration program consisting of a reconnaissance, exploratory borings and percolation testing was conducted to obtain information on the site and subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing. were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The 60 acre parcel will be subdivided into 11 lots between 5 and 7 acres in size and located as shown on Fig. 1. The development will consist of single family homes. The building area will generally be in the front part of each lot. A private road will access the building sites from County Road 221. We assume the residences will be typical of the area and be two to three stories with a partial or full basement., The development will be serviced with individual wells and septic disposal systems. If development plans change significantly from those described, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. -2 SITE CONDITIONS The proposed Nati', Springs Subdivision is located on the north side of the Colorado River about two miles east of Rifle. The 60 acre property covers parts of the northern half of Section 11 and the southern half of Section 2, T. 5 S., R. 93 W. County Road 221 borders the property on the south and County Road 210 borders the property on the northwest. The Colorado River is located about 3,000 feet to the south and about 50 feet lower in elevation than the property. The general topography in the area is shown by the contour lines on Fig. 1. The ground surface over most of the property slopes down to the southwest at about 2%. Moderately sloping, small alluvial fans are present in the northwestern part of the property. The fan slopes are typically betweea 5 `,'c and 207. To the northwest of Road 210 the alluvial fan slopes abruptly transition to a very steep terrace escarpment. Slopes on the escarpment average about S0. Major drainazes do not cross through the property. The drainage basins above the alluvial fans are small and restricted to the 160 foot hi_h terrace escarpment. At the time of our study the property was irrigated pasture. Several irrigation ditches are present on the property. GEOLOGIC SETTING The project is located in the Piceance Basin. This regional geologic structure was formed during the Laramide orogeny about 40 to 70 million years ago. In addition to the main basin structure there are other northwest trending secondary folds in this part of the basin (Shroba and Scott, 1997). The folds have very small amplitudes in this part of the basin and bedding is essentially horizontal. Major faults have not been mapped in the project area. Surficial soil deposits consist of colluvium and alluvium. Formation rock in the area is the Wasatch Formation. FORMATION ROCK Regional geologic mapping shows that formation rock in the project area is the Shire member (Tws) of the Eocene and Paleocene Wasatch Formation (Shroba and Scott, 1997). The rock is covered by surficial soil deposits and outcrops are not present. It is expected that formation rock is relatively shallow on the terrace escarpment to the northwest of County Road 210, but elsewhere rock is expected to lie well below typical residential foundation depths. The Shire member consists of varied colored claystone, mudstone, and siltstone interbedded with less abundant coarse- grained sandstone (Shroba and Scott, 1997). The claystone. mudstone and siltstone are usually firm but non-cemented. The sandstones are usually cemented and hard. Joints are commonly present in the cemented rock. The beds occur as complex lenses with limited horizontal continuity. SURFICIAL SOIL DEPOSITS The project area is located on a low river terrace (Qt l) that is about 5 to 10 feet above the modern Colorado River channel near the river. At the project site relatively deep upland alluvium (Qua) covers the low river terrace alluvium. River alluvium was encountered in Borings 1 and 4 at depths of 33 and 45 feet below the ground surface. The river alluvium is a silty to clayey sand and gravel with cobbles. The low river terrace alluvium is in part late Pinedale glacial outwash and younger Holocene river alluvium (Shroba and Scott, 1997). The overlying upland alluvium (Qua) consists of interstratified silt, clay and silty sand. Small alluvial fans (Qaf) cover the upland alluvium in the northwestern part of the property. To the northwest of County Road 210 the alluvial fans transition to shallow colluvium (Qc) on the high terrace escarpment. Bull Lake and older glacial outwash underlies the terrace surfaces at the top of the high escarpment. k t LD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on August 1, 2000. Six exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a truck -mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. A percolation test hole was drilled next to each boring with a 6 -inch diameter auger. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 4 Samples of the subsoils were taken with 13/4 inch and 2 inch [.D. spoon samplers. The sarnplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency •of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figs. 2 and 3. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown ori Figs. 2 and 3. The subsoils consist of about 11 to 2 feet of topsoil overlying stratified sand, silt and clay. The upper soils are slightly moist to moist and medium dense!stiff to wet and soft generally below 5 to 10 feet depth.. Dense, silty to clayey sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders was encountered in Borings 1 and 4 at depths of 33 and 45 feet, respectively. Drilling in the dense gravel with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, finer than sand size gradation analyses and liquid and plastic limits Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the upper soils, presented on Figs. 5 and 6, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The samples showed minor settlement/heave potential when wetted under a relatively light constant load. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table L Free water was typically encountered in the borings at a depth of about 10 feet at the time of drilling. When checked the next day, the borings were dry and had caved at depths of 5 to 10 feet which could be just above the stabilized groundwater level. Boring 3 was dry to the drilled depth of 20 feet. -5 GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT De.•eIoprrent of the propery as proposed should be feasible based on the geologic conditions with some considerations in the project planning and design. Geologic conditions that should be considered in project planning and design are discussed below. FLOODING AND SURFACE DRAINAGE Large off-site drainage basins are not tributary to the project area. Channels on the alluvial fans in the northwestern pati of the site are poorly defined and the fans could be the site of high sediment concentration sheet flooding associated with intense t understoru:s. The flood potential on these fans should be considered by your hydrologist as part of the storm water management and drainage plan for the development. The potential for irrigation ditch blockage and overflow should be included in the hydrologic evaluations. MOISTURE SENSITIVE SOILS The upland alluvium (Qua) encountered in the exploratory borings was wet and soft below a depth of 5 to 10 feet but the upper soil was stiff and relatively dry. It has been our experience that relatively dry soils similar to the upland alluvium (Qua) and alluvial fans (Qat) at the site can be moisture sensitive and experience relatively large settlements if they become wetted after construction. Consideration for residential foundations are discussed in the Preliminary Design Recammenans section of this report. CONSTRUCTION RELATED SLOPE INSTABILITY Slopes in the proposed building envelopes do not exceed about 15 %. We do not expect problems with construction related slope instability associated with grading typical of most residential construction in the proposed building envelopes. Grading is not recommended on the steep terrace escarpment to the northwest of County Road 210 unless evaluated by a geotechnical engineer. 6 EARTHQUAKES The project site could experience moderately strong earthquake ground shaking of Modified Mercalli Intensit.. VI during a reasonable service life for the development, but the probability for a stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. The occupied structures should be designed to \ ithstand moderately strong ground shaking with little or no damage and not to collapse under stronger ground shaking. The site is located in the Uniform Building Code Seismic Risk Zone 1. Based on our current understanding of the earthquake hazard in this part of Colorado, we see no reason to increase the commonly accepted seismic risk zone of the area. PRELEVIIN RY DESIGN RECONLMEY-DATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, and our experience in the area. The recommendations are suitable for planning and prel a'nar design but site specific studies should be conducted for individual lot development. FOUNDATIONS Bearing conditions will probably vary somewhat due to the stratification of the subsoils and the typical shallow groundwater condition. Based on the nature of the proposed constructioa,,shallow spread footings bean the upper natural soils should be suitable for building support. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,000 psf to 1,500 psf. There could be some potential for additional differential settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. The footing bearing level should be kept relatively shallow to avoid groundwater and soft soil impacts. In general, the footing bearing level should be kept at least 2 feet above the groundwater level. Full basement construction may not be feasible in some areas of the site due to potential shallow groundwater. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. 7 Belmy grade areas and retaining v, alis should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by use of an underdrain system. The footings should have a minimum depth of 36 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS Slab -on -grade cyto su�should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils. There could be some potential for settlementf`heave if the subsoils become wetted. To reduce the effects o i T ? hfial-thovement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. A minimum 4 inch thick layer of free -draining gravel should underlie interior slabs to facilitate drainage. Floor levels should be kept at least 2 feet above the groundwater level. L NDERDRAIN SYSTEM Groundwater vel was encountered in the exploratory borings at relatively shallow depth and irrigation of the surrounding area will tend to keep the water level shallow. Local perched groundwater can also develop during times of heavy, precipitation or seasonal s ral randff.-fin underdrain system should be provided to protect below -grade construction, such as retaining wall and basement areas from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or a sump and pump. Shallow crawlspace areas should not need a perimeter foundation drain provided the backfill is well compacted and has a positive slope away from the building. Below grade levels of the buildings should be kept at least 2 feet above the groundwater level. SITE GRADING Cut depths for the building pads shoal+exceed about 5 to 8 feet depending on the groundwater level. Fills should be limited to about 5 feet deep above existing ground surface. Structural fills should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fi.11 placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 90% of standard Proctor density. The on-site soils excluding veygetation and topsoil should be suitable for use in embankment tills. The deeper soils may be highly moist and require drying before use as backfill material. SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the subdivision shouldider potential runoff from uphill slopes thr ugh the project and at individual sites. \Vater should not be allowed co pond which could impact slope stability and foundations. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should be well com acted and have a positive slope away from the building—for a distance of 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well 'beyond the limits of all backfill anal r , • restr` PERCOLATION TESTING Percolation tests were conducted adjacent to each of the exploratory borings to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal systems at the site. The test holes were drilled with 6 inch diameter auger and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils encountered in the percolation holes are similar to those encountered in the exploratory borings shown on Fig. 2 and consist of stratified sand, silt and clay. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, conventional infiltration septic disposal systems should be feasibl .at -the -site. _Aroounded system could be needed in shallow groundwater areas. A civil engineer should design the infiltration septic disposal system it of each lot development. - LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this 1 t an fs.-h Yr"11 -9 report are based upon the data obtained from the field reconnaissance, review of published geologic reports. the exploratory borings located as shown on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additionalevaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLPlrsolksw cc; Land Design Partners - Attu: Ron Liston - 10 - REFERENCES Shroba, R. R., and Scott, R. B., 1997, Geology Map of the Rifle Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report 97-852. Tweto, O. and Others, 1978. Geologic Map of the Leadville 10 x 2° Quadrangle, Northwestern Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Map 1-999. INN M 1 IIME— NE M MIN = NM Qc/Tws/ Y / QclTws 1 I •'' Qaf -�~ Qua/Qtl iGl7 1 Lot 6 7 'l` 4 /1/ ,/,;-1.11-::-.%\,• `' , 1 • L418 • &2 Qaf r r P Lag Qua/Qt1 10 OE" i r Lot 11 • Lot 4 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 1 County Road 221 L Lot 5 • Qua1Qtl I r� • EXPLANATION: QC - Colluvium Qaf - Alluvial Fan Qua - Upland Alluvium Qtl- Low River Terrace Tws - Wasatch Formation Shire Member - Contact (approx.) - Toe of Steep Slope (approx.) Building Envelope &1• Boring (approx.) 0 300 n. 1 � 1 Scale 1 In. w 300 ft. Contours 5 ft. • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BORING 1 ELEV.-=-5371" 0 5 10 — 15 20 100 460 BORING 2 ELEV.=5378' 20/12 11/12 WC -3.7 00=100 —2002220 4/12 Wea•29.8 00=100 —200=98 LL -31 P113 4/12 5/12 BORING 3 ELEV.-538C 20/12 17/12 WC -.s 00=115 14/12 10/12 7/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 4. HEPWORTH - PAY&AK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 11 , 1 1 1 1 1 0 BORING 4 ELEV.=5389' io 10 15 20 25 30 45 50 100 460 of 101 6/12 w0=6.3 00=106 -200=64 LL=22 P1=7 4/12 6/12 5/12 8/12 CHANGE 1N SOIL TYPE AT 45' BORING 5 ELEV. = 5380' 5/12 WC=20.3 00=104 -200=66 3/12 3/12 5/12 BORING 6 ELEV. =5374' 15/12 6/12 WC=18.2 00=110 1/12 3/12 iil rA 3/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 4. HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45 50 Elevation — Feet Fig. 3 1 GEND: TOPSOIL; organic sand, silt and cloy.. ill 12.p 12 SILT AND CLAY (ML—CL); slightly sandy to sandy, stratified, stiff and slightly with depth, brown, law plasticity. SAND (SM); silty, sandy silt layers, loose to medium dense, slightly moist to medium sand. SAND, GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM—GC); silty, clayey, dense, wet, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. NOTES: IExploratory borings were drilled on August 1. 2000 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. moist to soft and wet moist, brown, fine to Drive sample; standard penetration test ( SPT ), 1 3/8—inch LD. split spoon sample, ASTM D — 1586. Drive sornple blow count; indicates that 6 blows of a 140—pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Ground water level at time of drilling. Caved depth when checked on August 2, 2000. Practical drilling refusal. . Elevations of exploratory borings were estimated from • The exploratory boring locations and elevations should by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory between material types and transitions may be gradua contours on the site plan provided. be considered accurate only to the degree implied boring Togs represent the approximate boundaries Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. No free water was encountered in Boring 3. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (% ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit ( is ) PI = Plasticity index (% ) 100 460 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL., INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 4 100 Fig. 5 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Compression Compression 2 3 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 9.6 percent Dry Density = 115 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Coy From: Boring 3 at 5 Feet irill11111111Mbh: 111111 II 111111 9111 Expansion upon wetting R 0.1 100 460 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH - PAWL.AK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL--CONSOUDA110N TEST RESULTS T - - Moisture Content - 9,0 percent Dry Density = 110 pcf Sample Sandy Silt Clay of: cnd From: Scring 1 of 2 Fee` 1 f ,_ i Compress:or i upon wetting 11p 1 1. • 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 9.6 percent Dry Density = 115 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Coy From: Boring 3 at 5 Feet irill11111111Mbh: 111111 II 111111 9111 Expansion upon wetting R 0.1 100 460 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH - PAWL.AK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL--CONSOUDA110N TEST RESULTS ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 Compression 0 1 2 3 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL --CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 100 Fig. 6 I 11 1 Moisture Content = 18.2 percent Dry Density = 110 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay From: wring 6 at 5 Feet I 1 1 1 1 Compression IIIl upon wetting ao r i , r 1 L { ! 1 ! 1 !! I 1 I 1 1 I 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL --CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 100 Fig. 6 IM NM E MI M M NM MI E 1 N M HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 100 460 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT NATURAL DRY DENSITY WO GRADATION GRAVEL i7kl SAND I%I BORING DEPTH {/till I1nl 110 1 2 9.0 2 5 3.7 100 10 29.8 100 3 5 9.6 115 106 4 5 8.3 5 5 20.3 104 6 5 18.2 110 PERCENT PASSING NO, 200 SIEVE Al IEliUskliLi llMlIS LIOUIL) PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX {yil IA.t U NCON F MED COMPRESSIVE STRENG1 II IPSFI SOIL ON IICOROCK TYPE Sandy silt and ctay 20 98 31 13 Silty sand Silty clay Sandy silty clay 64 22 7 Sandy silt and clay 66 Sandy silt Sandy silt and clay 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 11 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 100 46e PAGE 1 OF 2 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH !INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN} WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN.;INCH) P-1 48 20 37 36 1 36 35 1/2 1/2 35 1/2 35 1/2 40 P-2 P-3 P-4 46 50 51 5 5 10 18 1/2 15 1/2 3 15 112 14 1112 14 12 2 12 10 1/2 1 1/2 10 1/2 8 112 28 27 112 2 1/2 27 1/2 1 27 1/2 27 26 112 1;2 26 112 1 26 30 26 1/2 4 26 1 24 2 24 1 22 2 22 I 20 2 1 20 4 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 10 5 Note: Tests were conducted in 6 -inch diameter auger holes on August 2, 2000. The holes were drilled and soaked on August 1, 2000. The percolation holes were drilled next to the corresponding numbered boring (see Fig. 1). 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 100 460 PAGE 2 OF 2 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-5 46 5 refill 14 112 12 2 112 2 25 21 4 21 17 4 17 13112 3112 P-6 59 20 36112 35112 1 35 112 34 112 1 34 112 33 112 1 20 Note: Tests were conducted in 6 -inch diameter auger holes on August 2, 2000. The holes were drilled and soaked on August 1, 2000. The percoiation holes were drilled next to the corresponding numbered boring (see Fig. 1). GAMMA RADIATION SURVEY Gtech June 7, 2000 Jim and Paul Luginbuhl P.O. Box 950 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Hepworth-Pawiak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No.100 460 Subject: Gamma Radiation Survey, Proposed Native Springs Subdivision, County Road 210, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr and Mrs. Luginbuhl: As requested, we have performed a radiation survey at the subject site. The findings and conclusions of our work are presented in this report. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for professional services to you, dated May 4, 2000. Proposed Development: The 60 acre parcel will be divided into 11 lots between about 5 to 7 acres in size for single family residences. Access will be off County Road 221 with a cul-de-sac street. The back part of each lot will be a restricted no building area. The current use of the site is irrigated pasture. Radiation Survey: A gamma radiation survey was conducted in the development area (excluding the no building area) on June 6, 2000. Gamma radiation measurements were taken on about 200 foot spacings using a Ludlum Model 3 survey meter and Ludlum Model 44-9 detector. The readings were taken about 21/2 feet above the ground surface. A total of 53 survey points were taken and the readings ranged from 0.015 to 0.25 millirems per hour with an average of about 0.021 millirems per hour. Background readings taken approximately 2 mile east of the property were 0.02 millirems per hour. Conclusions: The gamma radiation readings taken at the subject site appear to be typical of natural background Levels in the area. No mitigation of the radiation should be required. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAW AL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P SLP/ksm cc: =Land Design Partn n Liston WILDLIFE REPORT 1 rEATTIE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSULTING, INC. Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. 1546 E. 12th Street Rifle, CO 81650 e-mail: beattie@imageline.com Office: 970-625-0599 Fax: 970-625-0600 Home: 970-625-0598 Cellular: 970-379-1451 WILDLIFE REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION Prepared for Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Jim and Paul Luginbuhl P.O.. Box 950 Basalt, CO 81621 Prepared by Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. 1546 E. 12t1, Street Rifle, CO 81650 September, 2000 MO 1 Wildlife Report for Silt Heights Subdivision Page i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 1 Description of Area 2 Wildlife Field Survey 3 Interview with Don Crane 5 Wildlife Information From NDIS 6 Amphibians 7 Reptiles 9 Mammals 13 Birds 15 Threatened and Endangered Species 16 Dogs and Pet Control 17 Fences 18 Garbage, Trash and Compost Containers 18 Additional Restrictions/Requirements 18 Indemnification 18 Disposal of Animal Carcasses 19 Securing hay 19 Skunk and Raccoon Denning Areas 19 Enforcement of Provisions by HOA 21 Summary of Wildlife Impacts Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Silt Heights Subdivision Pape ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page 24 Literature Cited 25 Tables F1 Figures Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Silt Heights Subdivision Page iii LIST OF TABLES Page 25 Table 1. Species of amphibians for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. 26 Table 2. Species of reptiles for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. 27 Table 3. Species of mammals for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. 29 Table 4. Species of birds for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. 34 Table 5. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern. 36 Table 6. Federal threatened and endangered species reported for Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Silt Heights Subdivision Page iv LIST OF FIGURES Page F1 Figure 1. Vicinity map showing location of the proposed Native Springs Subdivision ( FRI ) in relationship to Silt, Colorado. F2 Figure 2. Lot layout for the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. F3 Figure 3. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the canyon treefrog and New Mexico spadefoot on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F4 Figure 4. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the red -spotted toad on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F5 Figure 5. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the Great Basin spadefoot and northern leopard frog on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F6 Figure 6. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the common kingsnake on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F7 Figure 7. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the midget faded rattlesnake on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F8 Figure 8. Natural Diversity information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for Ord"s kangaroo rat, desert shrew, and dwarf shrew on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F9 Figure 9. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the kit fox on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F10 Figure 10. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the northern pocket gopher on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Silt Heights Subdivision Page v LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Page F11 Figure 11. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for Botta's pocket gopher on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F12 Figure 12. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped overall range for elk on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F13 Figure 13. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped overall range for mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F14 Figure 14. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F15 Figure 15. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped winter activity areas for mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F16 Figure 16. Natural Diversity Information Source (ND1S) mapped activity areas for the mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F17 Figure 17. Colorado Division of Wildlife lynx potential habitat () map. Source: www.ndis.nrel.colostate.edulexcop/images/mapsflynx.jpg. F18 Figure 18. Natural Diversity Information Source {NDIS} mapped suitable habitat for the peregrine falcon, sage grouse, and southwestern willow flycatcher on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F19 Figure 19. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the bald eagle and ferruginous hawk on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right- hand box. F20 Figure 20. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the greater sandhill crane on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Silt Heights Subdivision Page vi LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Page F21 Figure 21. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the Mexican spotted owl on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F22 Figure 22. Natural Diversity Information Source (ND1S) mapped suitable habitat for the whooping crane and mountain plover on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. F23 Figure 23. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the western burrowing owl on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Re • ort for Native S i rin s Subdivision Page 1 INTRODUCTION Jim and Paul Luginbuhl have proposed development of the Native Springs Subdivision to the east of Rifle, Colorado (Fig. 1). The proposed development would allow 11 Tots an 66 acres of land (Fig. 2). Land Design Partnership, on behalf of the developers, requested that I prepare a wildlife report for the proposed subdivision. DESCRIPTION OF AREA The proposed subdivision occurs in a portion of Sections 2 and 11, T6S, R93W, 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. The general location is approximately 2 miles east of Rifle and 5 miles west of Silt. The proposed subdivision property is bound on the south by County Road 221, also known as Green Lane. On the west, County Road 210 creates part of the property boundary but separates a 2.4 acre tract from the rest of the property. The tract west of County Road 210 is very steep along the county road and rises to the west to near vertical rock bluffs. There is a very small area of gently sloping land at the top of the rock bluff. Dominant vegetation in the area south of the rock bluff is sagebrush, greasewood, and rabbitbrush. Below County Road 210, the slope drops 30 to 40 feet to the very gently sloping, irrigated hayfields that comprise the vast majority of the property. A large portion of the irrigation water for the property comes from the Grand River Ditch Company ditch with a lesser quantity from a spring above County Road 210. A buried irrigation pipe along the north boundary of the property and northlsouth centrally in the property provides the main distribution of irrigation water. An irrigation ditch along the east and south boundary of the property carries irrigation water to other downstream users. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision _ Page 2 A small ditch running diagonally across the site to the southwest and down the west property line collects irrigation wastewater from this site and from the property to the north. This water is delivered to a culvert under County Road 221. The elevation of the proposed subdivision is approximately 5,400 feet. Ninety percent or more of the property consists of alfalfa and pasture grass that is irrigated by gated PVC pipes. A barbed wire fence surrounds the entire property and an interior barbed wire fences is oriented east -west near the middle of the property. Evidence of previous grazing by cattle occurs on the site. The proposed subdivision contains very few trees. Scattered Russian olive trees occur along perimeter and interior fences. Several small plains cottonwood trees occur along the northwestern boundary and three large cottonwood trees occur along the northern boundary. Two 5 -foot tall Siberian elm trees occur along the north boundary and abut a hayfield. With the exception of sagebrush, greasewood, and rabbitbrush that occur northwest of County Road 210 (open space) and between the Lower Cactus Valley Ditch and County Road 210, the site essentially contains no shrubland. The only wetland vegetation on the site occurs along irrigation and drainage ditches. The proposed development property does not have existing buildings or outbuildings. WILDLIFE FIELD SURVEY I conducted a wildlife field survey on the 66 -acre property on August 27, 2000. No reptiles or amphibians were observed. The only mammals observed were the yellow -bellied marmot and deer mouse (dead). I did observe sign of raccoons (tracks), skunks (tracks), cottontail rabbits (pellets, browsed pants), and mule deer (tracks, Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 droppings). Raccoon and skunk tracks were located in the sagebrush-greasewood habitat along the Lower Cactus Valley Ditch. Deer tracks and droppings occurred at various places on the proposed development. Birds observed were the western meadowlark, American robin, turkey vulture, red-tailed hawk, kestrel, mourning dove black -billed magpie, red -winged blackbird, killdeer, and northern flicker. INTERVIEW WITH DON CRANE Prior to his recent retirement, Don Crane was a District Wildlife Manager for the Colorado Division of Wildlife and had administrative responsibility for the area encompassing the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. Since 1984, Mr. Crane has lived in a house located approximately 3 miles east-northeast of the proposed subdivision. On May 26, 2000 I interviewed Mr. Crane and asked him questions about wildlife on a proposed 78 -acre development (Mamm's View Subdivision) to the northwest of his residence. Because of the relatively close proximity of the Native Springs Subdivision to the Mamm's View Subdivision (they are 3 miles apart), and the fact that both subdivisions consist primarily of irrigated hayfields, I will discuss some of the interview results as they may generalize to the Native Springs Subdivision. Mr. Crane reported that he had not seen amphibians in wetland areas and drainage areas in this area of Silt Mesa. He has observed various species of snakes (water snake, gopher snake, and garter snake). DWM Crane reported that common birds in the area include the magpie, western meadowlark, western kingbird, American robin, starling, red -winged blackbird, turkey vulture, ring-necked pheasant, pigeon, and crow. Common mammals in the area include the cottontail rabbit, mule deer, red fox, Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 4 striped skunk, raccoon, and various species of small rodents (e.g. house mouse, deer mouse, meadow vole, thirteen -lined ground squirrel). I asked DWM Crane about concerns, primarily wildlife -related, he had about the proposed Mamm's View Subdivision. l believe that his concerns would apply to the Native Springs Subdivision. He had the following suggestions and remarks: 1. Fences installed around lots should not entangle deer. 2. Residents of the subdivision need to be aware that the CDOW does not compensate homeowners who have damage caused by wildlife to landscape plants and gardens. 3. If a homeowner has a horse and stores hay during the winter, the hay should not be accessible to deer. 4. Dogs need to be confined or controlled. 5. Junk vehicles, construction scrap piles, discarded appliances, and similar items should not be allowed since they can draw skunks.. 6. Household trash should be secured to reduce problems with raccoons and skunks. 7. All utilities should be buried. 8. The only horses allowed should be mares and geldings (no stud horses). I will address Mr. Crane's suggestions later in this report. I asked DWM Crane if development would impact any federal or state threatened or endangered wildlife or Colorado species of special concern. In his opinion, the subdivision will not affect any threatened, endangered, or special concern species. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 y y ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 5 WILDLIFE INFORMATION FROM NDIS Databases accessed for preparation of this report included the Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) and the System for Conservation Planning (SCoP) [www.ndis.nrel.colostate.edu]. NDIS and SCoP are a collaborative effort of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, and Colorado State University. SCoP provides maps of activity areas of wildlife species, maps of element occurrences (e.g. species, subspecies, populations, natural communities), maps of conservation sites, and maps of suitable habitat. Habitat suitability maps are created by dividing land in a county into 100 X 100 meter cells and determining if a species has an affinity for the vegetation cover in a cell, if the cell is within the elevation range of the species, and if the cell is sufficiently close to water for species that require access to free water, such as ponds, steams, and lakes. It is important to note that although suitable habitat may exist for a species in a particular area, this habitat may not be occupied by the species. I selected a user -defined area slightly larger than the proposed subdivision and had NDIS generate a list of amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals for which existing or potentially suitable habitat is reported to occur on the proposed subdivision. Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates selected to define the search area were N 4381158 E 263905, N 4380609 E 263905, N 4381158 E 264564, and N 4380609 E 264564. Tables 1-4 list species of amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and birds, respectively, for which suitable habitat is reported to exist on the Native Springs Subdivision. Tables 1-4 do not list all species of wildlife which utilize the proposed subdivision. NDIS generates information about selected species in an area and Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 6 emphasizes endangered, threatened, rare, imperiled and uncommon wildlife. The presence of suitable habitat for a species on the project area does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the species occurs on the site. Amphibians NDIS identified suitable habitat on the proposed subdivision for the following species of amphibians: canyon treefrog (Fig. 3), Great Basin spadefoot (Fig. 5), New Mexico spadefoot (Fig. 3) , northern leopard frog, red -spotted toad (Fig. 4), and boreal toad (Table 1). I did not see or hear any amphibians in or near irrigation ditches on the proposed subdivision. DWM Don Crane has not encountered any of the NDIS-selected species in the general area of the subdivision. NDIS identified suitable habitat for the canyon treefrog on a very small portion of the northern edge of the proposed subdivision (Fig. 3). The canyon treefrog is a state species of special concern. The canyon treefrog occurs along intermittent streams in deep rocky canyons. Scattered cottonwood trees often occur along inhabited stream courses and pinyon -juniper woodland occurs on the canyon slopes. These habitat features do not occur on the proposed development. In addition, the canyon treefrog has not been reported to occur on Silt Mesa (Hammerson 1986:34). This species is known to occur in western Colorado along the south rim of the Colorado River valley west of Grand Junction and in John Brown Canyon (Mesa County). Development of the Native Springs Subdivision will not impact the canyon treefrog. The boreal toad is a high elevation (7,000 feet - 12,900 feet) toad that lives in suitable habitat in lodgepole pine, spruce -fir forests and alpine meadow areas. It has been found in shallow water or among sedges and shrubby willows where the soil is Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 7 damp or wet. The proposed development site does not contain the habitat features required by the boreal toad and is below the lower elevational limits at which the boreal toad is found. Don Crane reported that the boreal toad does not occur on Silt Mesa. The northern leopard frog is a state species of special concern. NDIS mapped suitable habitat for this species on a very small parcel at the northern edge of the proposed Native Springs Subdivision (Fig. 5). The northern leopard frog typically inhabits the banks and shallow portions of marshes, ponds, lakes, reservoirs, beaver ponds, streams and other bodies of permanent water, especially those having rooted aquatic vegetation. it also inhabits irrigation ditches and wet meadows. Development of Native Springs Subdivision will not have a significant impact on the northern leopard frog if the irrigation ditches are left intact and if wetland areas are retained along the return flow ditch on the southern boundary of the property. Reptiles NDIS identified suitable habitat on the proposed subdivision for the following species of reptiles: common kingsnake, eastern fence lizard, many -lined skink, midget - faded rattlesnake, milk snake, racer, short homed lizard, Iongnose leopard lizard, night snake, and southwestern blackhead snake (Table 2). I did not observe any reptiles during my wildlife field survey and, with the exception of the eastern fence lizard, I would not expect the above species to occur on the site. DWM Crane reported having seen garter, water, and gopher snakes in the general area. The eastern fence lizard, garter snake, water snake, milk snake and gopher snake are not considered endangered, threatened, or of special state concern. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 8 The common kingsnake is a state species of special concern. NDIS mapped the entire proposed development as being suitable habitat for this species (Fig. 6). The common kingsnake ranges throughout the southern U.S. and northern Mexico. In Colorado it has been reported only for Montezuma and Otero counties (Hammerson 1986:92). Development of the Native Springs Subdivision will have no impact on the common kingsnake. The midget -faded rattlesnake is a state species of special concern. NDIS mapped approximately 70% of the proposed development as being suitable habitat for this species (Fig. 7). The snake is one of two subspecies of rattlesnakes in Colorado (the other subspecies is the prairie rattlesnake). Rattlesnakes occur in virtually every terrestrial habitat within its broad geographic and elevational range in Colorado. Typical habitats include plains grasslands, sandhills, mountain and semidesert shrublands, sagebrush, riparian vegetation, pinyon juniper woodlands, and open coniferous forests. Don Crane never saw a rattlesnake near the proposed development in the 16 years he lived in the area. Although the Native Springs Subdivision contains habitat suitable for the midget -faded rattlesnake (particularly the sagebrush-greasewood hillside north of County Road 210), in my opinion the species does not inhabit the area and thus will not be affected by development. NDIS identified suitable habitat for the southwestern blackhead snake on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. This reptile is a state species of special concern. It is known to occur along the edge of the Grand Valley in west -central Colorado but has not been reported for Silt Mesa. It has been previously found in the mouths of large canyons in areas dominated by sandy, rock -laden soils and dryland shrubs (e.g. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 9 sagebrush, greasewood, saltbrush). Don Crane did not observe this species in the general area encompassing the proposed subdivision. Although Native Springs Subdivision contains a small acreage of habitat suitable for the southwestern blackhead snake, in my opinion the species does not inhabit the area and thus will not be affected by development. Mammals NDIS identified suitable habitat on Native Springs Subdivision for 33 species of mammals (Table 3). Black bears are rarely sighted in the area and mountain lion occurrences are extremely rate. DWM Crane did not foresee any potential conflicts between residents of the proposed subdivision and bears and lions. Suitable habitat is mapped for Botta's pocket gopher (Fig. 11) and the northern pocket gopher (Fig. 10). I did not observe these species or see evidence of their presence on the proposed subdivision (e.g. complex burrow systems, conspicuous earthen ridges). According to Fitzgerald et al. (1994:203, 206), Botta's pocket gopher does not occur in Garfield County and the northern pocket gopher does not occur in the area encompassing the proposed subdivision. It is not likely that the dwarf shrew occurs on the site (Fig. 8). The dwarf shrew, Colorado's smallest -bodied mammal, is typically found at higher elevations (above 5,500 feet). It is possible that masked, desert and Merriam's shrews occur in the area. None are considered endangered, threatened, or state species of special concern. Suitable habitat on the proposed subdivision was identified for the least chipmunk. Least chipmunks excavate burrows beneath tree roots, fallen logs, or rocks Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 10 and bushes, and also use these areas for feeding platforms and observation posts. Some of these habitat features are present on the Native Springs Subdivision. I did not observe the least chipmunk during my field survey. Although very marginal suitable habitat exists, my opinion is that the least chipmunk does not occur on the site but occurs at higher elevations. NDIS identified suitable habitat for 6 species of bats: spotted bat, Townsend's big -eared bat, Yuma myotis, big free -tailed bat, Brazilian free -tailed bat, and fringed myotis. The spotted bat is restricted to extreme northwestern Colorado, the Yuma myotis occurs west of the proposed subdivision, and Townsend's big -eared bat occupies the western one-half of Colorado. Habitat for the Brazilian free -tailed bat occurs north and south of the Colorado River in Garfield County. The big free -tailed bat has not been reported for Garfield County (Fitzgerald et al. 1994:129). Only five scattered records exist from Mesa, Otero, El Paso, Gunnison, and Weld counties. The fringed myotis has not been reported for the area encompassing the proposed development. Bats use caves, mines, buildings, woodpiles, rockpiles, and trees for day and night roosting sites. The general absence of these features on the site of the proposed subdivision reduces the importance of this area to bats for roosting habitat. DWM Don Crane has observed bats over the years feeding in the general area. They are likely big and little brown bats. Development of Native Springs Subdivision will not have a noticeable impact on bats. Endangered/threatened mammals for which NDIS identified suitable habitat are the northern river otter, kit fox, and lynx. The northern river otter does not occur on the Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Pape 11 property. The kit fox can be found in extreme southwestern Garfield County along the Utah border but does not occur on Silt Mesa. The Canada lynx is a federally threatened and Colorado endangered species. Colorado is on the southern edge of historic lynx range, and before reintroduction in 1999, there had been no confirmed sightings in the state since 1973. Forty-one lynx were released near Pagosa Springs in February 1999 and an additional release was made in the same area this past winter. Some of the male lynx wandered as far as New Mexico, Wyoming, and Nebraska, In the southern Rocky Mountains, lynx are found predominantly above 7,800 feet. Vegetation affinities include aspen, spruce fir, spruce -fir clearcuts, Douglas fir, blue spruce, lodgepole pine clearcuts, limber pine, white fir, bristlecone pine, mixed conifer, mixed forest, and shrub tundra. The proposed Native Springs Subdivision is below the elevation at which lynx occur in Colorado and odes not contain the vegetation types associated with lynx habitat. In addition, the proposed Native Springs Subdivision lies outside of potential lynx habitat identified by the CDOW (Fig. 17). Development of Native Springs Subdivision will have no direct impact on lynx or lynx habitat. It is likely that the house mouse, deer mouse, and meadow vole occur on the proposed subdivision. The deer mouse and meadow vole probably occur near the irrigation ditches. The house mouse, deer mouse, and meadow vole are not considered threatened, endangered, or of special state concern. NDIS identified suitable habitat for the following small mammals of state special concern: silky pocket mouse, western harvest mouse, white-tailed antelope squirrel, and white -throated woodrat. The silky pocket mouse is generally not found in the western one-half of Colorado. Historical range of the western harvest mouse and white-tailed Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 Wildlife 'Re ort for Native S rine, s Subdivision Pa' a 12 antelope squirrel is southwest of the proposed development. The white -throated woodrat is largely confined to southeastern and southwestern Colorado. In my opinion, development of Native Springs Subdivision will have no significant impact on the aforementioned small mammals of state special concern. Mule deer use the site, primarily during the winter. The area is considered deer overall range, deer winter range, and a deer resident population area (Figs. 14, 15, 16). The site for the proposed subdivision does not constitute critical mule deer habitat (Figs. 14, 15, 16). Because of the virtual absence on the property of trees and shrubs, mule deer do not bed down during the day on the site. Daytime resting and hiding areas are on the pinyon -juniper mesas to the north-northwest of the proposed development. In the evening, deer move off the mesas and hillsides, cross County Road 210, and feed on the alfalfa and grass fields on the site. The acreage available for foraging by mule deer will be reduced following development. However, in my opinion, deer in this area are not limited by a lack of food. The rear portion of each lot is protected from development. Mule deer will feed in these areas at night following development. Elk occur in the area very rarely during unusually severe winters. Don Crane did not foresee any impact in the general area of the development on elk. Development of Native Springs Subdivision will not have a significant impact on critical habitat for any mammal species. The area is monotypic (irrigated grasslands and alfalfa) and lacks structural density (e.g. ground layer, shrub layer, subcanopy, canopy, rock outcroppings, downed Togs, different -aged vegetation). It does not support a significant number of mammal species or a large number of individuals. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Re • ort for Native Sarin • s Subdivision Pa "" e 13 Birds NDIS identified suitable habitat on the proposed subdivision for 73 species of birds (Table 4). I will first address species which are classified as federally or state threatened or endangered, or are considered state species of special concern. The bald eagle is a federal and state threatened species (Fig. 11). Bald eagles can commonly be seen flying over the Colorado River and can be seen perched on tall cottonwood trees along the Colorado River during the winter. However, they do not use the proposed subdivision site. Don Crane has occasionally seen bald eagles flying over but not landing in the general area. Barrow's goldeneye is a state species of special concern. It is a rare winter resident and spring and fall migrant in western valleys. In some years it may be locally uncommon along the Colorado River and its tributaries. Barrow's goldeneye prefers reservoirs, rivers, and mountain ponds. The Native Springs Subdivision will have no impact on Barrow's goldeneye. The ferruginous hawk, a state species of special concern, is common in winter in eastern Colorado but is rare or uncommon in other areas and seasons. It may occasionally be seen during migration in Garfield County. Don Crane has not observed the ferruginous hawk near the proposed subdivision. The greater sandhill crane is a state species of special concern. Don Crane has observed sandhill cranes in the area over the years but considers them very uncommon. Migrating sandhill cranes may use the undeveloped grasslands on the rear portion of lots during migration. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 14 NDIS identified suitable habitat for the federally and state threatened Mexican spotted owl on the site (Fig. 8). This species occupies two distinct habitat types in Colorado. The first consists of large, steep canyons with exposed cliffs and dense, old growth mixed coniferous forests. The second consists of canyons in pinyon -juniper areas with small and widely scattered patches of Douglas fir. Summer roosting sites are in a cool microclimate, generally with a closed canopy and/or on a north -facing slope. All known Colorado nesting sites consist of small scrapes in caves or crevices on steep cliff faces. Although ND1S mapped suitable habitat (presumably prey habitat) for the spotted owl on the proposed subdivision, the species does not occur in the area. Don Crane has not observed the Mexican spotted owl in the area. Habitat for the sage grouse, long -billed curlew, and mountain plover, state species of special concern, was identified on the site. None of these species occur in the area as a resident or as a migrant. The southwestern willow flycatcher (SWWF) is a federal and Colorado endangered species (Fig. 9). The SWWF is a riparian obligate, nesting only in dense, mesic riparian habitats, particularly areas dominated by willows. Willows are very scarce on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. I have observed the SWWF along the Colorado River between Rifle and Silt. The absence of dense riparian habitat dominated by willows an the proposed subdivision precludes nesting by the SWWF on the property. ND1S identified suitable habitat for the state -threatened western burrowing owl on the proposed subdivision. The owl is called a "burrowing owl" because it nest and roosts in abandoned burrows dug by mammals, especially prairie dogs. Burrowing owls Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Pa a 15 strongly prefer burrows in active black -tailed prairie dog towns. The burrowing owl is a winter visitor in eastern Colorado and a summer resident in extreme southern Garfield County. It does not occur in the vicinity of the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The whooping crane (Fig. 7) is a federal and Colorado endangered species. It is an uncommon spring and fall migrant in the San Luis Valley and is a casual migrant on the eastern plains. Although Garfield County lies outside of areas of fairly common migrational sightings in Colorado, I observed a single whooping crane 6 years ago in a marsh south of the Colorado River between Silt and Rifle. Don Crane has not observed whooping cranes on Silt Mesa. Development of Native Springs Subdivision will primarily affect bird species associated with grassland habitat (e.g. ring-necked pheasant, western meadowlark). Grassland/hayland is abundant on Silt Mesa and displaced birds can easily find suitable habitat. If natural areas outside of building envelopes, lawns and outbuildings, and driveways on lots in the Native Springs Subdivision are not converted to other vegetative types, bird species currently utilizing the property will utilize these natural areas. THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Colorado endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern are listed in Table 5. Federal threatened and endangered species reported for Colorado are listed in Table 6. After reviewing available information and reports, conducting a wildlife field survey, and interviewing former DWM Don Crane, I do not believe there are any federal or Colorado threatened or endangered vertebrates, or Colorado species of special concern, which would be negatively impacted by the proposed subdivision. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Re ort for Native S u rin s Subdivision Page 16 DOGS AND PET CONTROL Free -roaming dogs can have a substantial impact on deer. Free -roaming dogs include dogs normally around residences and occasionally wandering off and feral dogs (domesticated at one time but now semi -wild or wild). Free -roaming dogs can injure, disable and kill deer. Dog chases can also result in aborted young and a weakened physical condition in deer. It is necessary that dogs be controlled in the subdivision for the safety of residents and to curb harassment and killing of wildlife. I recommend the following control measures for Native Springs Subdivision: A. No dwelling unit should house more than three dogs and offspring up to three months of age. I have previously seen recommendations for subdivisions in Garfield County that limit dogs to one per household. Dogs are an important part of life for many people and l think it is important to allow up to three dogs per household. Properly controlled or confined, dogs will not affect wildlife. B. At no time should dogs be allowed to run freely outside of a dog owner's lot. C. When outside a resident's lot on Native Springs Subdivision, dogs should be leashed (dogs being transported into and out of the subdivision by motor vehicle would obviously not be required to be leashed. D. When outside the residence on an owner's lot, dogs should be controlled by: 1. Confinement in an area bound by an aboveground fence; 2. Confinement in a kennel; 3. Confinement in an area bounded by an invisible electric fence attached to a dwelling unit; 4. A leash; or Beattie Natural ResourcesConsulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 17 5. Attachment by a tether to a fixed, immovable object. The tether length should not allow the dog to trespass on another owner's lot. E. Dogs should not be allowed to chase or molest wildlife or any domestic animals or persons, or destroy or disturb property of another. F. Dogs should not be allowed to bark continuously, which shall be defined as barking for a 15 -minute period, including successive barks or a series of barks which repeat or resume following a brief or temporary cessation. G. All dogs should be licensed as required by law. H. No dog should threaten public safety. 1. The lot owner should be responsible for assuring compliance with dog regulations of another owner's dog occurring on a lot with the permission of the lot owner. J. No dog or other animal should be kept upon a unit which, in the sole discretion and judgment of the Association's Board of Directors, results in an annoyance or is obnoxious to unit owners within the subdivision. K. Homeowners not in compliance with dog regulations should be responsible for any and all costs associated with enforcement of the aforementioned provisions of the Native Springs Subdivision Homeowners Association (HOA). FENCES Fencing on individual lots should be restricted to reduce wildlife mortality and to reduce the potential for separation of doe deer and their offspring. The maximum fence height should be 42 inches. If a rail fence or 3 -strand wire fence is constructed, there Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 18 should be a 112 -inch separation between the top 2 rails/wire. Chain link fencing up to 6 feet high should be allowed for the purpose of kenneling a dog. GARBAGE, TRASH, AND COMPOST CONTAINERS It is important that residents of Native Springs Subdivision store garbage and trash in secure receptacles to reduce problems with skunks and raccoons. No refuse, garbage, trash, grass, shrub, or tree clippings, plant waste, scrap, rubbish, or debris of any kind should be kept, stored, maintained or allowed to accumulate or remain on any lot except temporarily within an enclosed structure within a building envelope. No garbage container, trash cans or receptacles should be maintained in an unsanitary condition. Garbage structures and containers should comply with recommendations which may be made from time to time by the CDOW. ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS/REQUIREMENTS Indemnification The Native Springs Subdivision Homeowner's Association should waive and hold the CDOW harmless from any and all claims for damages to landscaping improvements, fencing, ornamental and native plants, and garden plants resulting from the activities of wildlife. Disposal of Animal Carcasses The HOA and lot owners should be responsible for the removal and disposal of all animal carcasses (e.g. deer, raccoons) located upon the subdivision. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 r 1 �i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 19 Securing Hay Some residents may choose to maintain a horse or cows on their property. To reduce problems with deer, hay stored on a lot should be secured by a tarp, stored in a structure, or fenced. Skunk and Raccoon Denning Areas Residents of Native Springs Subdivision should maintain their Tots in a manner that will not attract denning skunks and raccoons. This can be addressed in the covenants by prohibiting the open storage of junk automobiles, machinery, appliances, junk piles, scrap piles, and other materials which may be used by skunks and raccoons for denning sites. Enforcement of Provisions by HOA Because of the relatively few homeowners who will be residents of the Native Springs Subdivision, 1 would anticipate that most potential conflicts and problems between homeowners would be resolved on an informal basis. However, in the event that conflicts (e.g. dog control, hay storage, fencing) are not resolved by discussion among homeowners, it is important that HOA enforcement provisions be available. The Native Springs Subdivision Homeowner's Association should be empowered to enforce covenants, conditions and restrictions for the subdivision. In the event that there is a violation of the covenants, conditions, and/or restrictions, the following enforcement procedures should be taken by the Association: 1. The owner violating a covenant, condition, and/or restriction should first receive a written warning of the violation. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 11 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 20 2. If a second offense occurs by an owner of the same type of violation or the owner does not correct the initial violation within one (1) calendar day after receiving notice (or such reasonable time as is necessary in order for the owner to correct the violation), then a fine of $100 will be assessed against the owner. 3. Upon the occurrence of a third offense of the same type of violation or the continuation of a violation in excess of two (2) calendar days after the owner receives notice, a fine of $150 will be assessed against the owner. 4. Upon the occurrence of a fourth offense of the same type of violation or the continuance of a violation in excess of four (4) calendar days after the owner receives notice, a fine of $300 will be assessed against the owner. In addition, the Association may take such action as is reasonably necessary to cause the violation to cease, including entry on the property of the owner. In the event of a pet or livestock violation, the animal(s) which is in violation may be removed from the owner's property for disposal if prohibited or for a period of one (1) or more weeks if the animal(s) is permitted but is in violation. Enforcement of animal violations will be made only with respect to the express provisions of the Declaration (or as otherwise set forth in the homeowner documents of the Association). Rules and laws of Garfield County shall be enforced by the County. 5. For each additional recurrence of the same type of violation, or if a violation continues beyond sixty (60) days after an owner receives notice, an additional fine will be assessed in an amount equal to double the amount of the previous Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 21 fine. With respect to a continuing violation, the additional fine will be assessed every four (4) calendar days beyond the sixty (60) day period during which the violation continues. The aggregate amount of fines which may be charged against an owner for the recurrence or continuation of one type of violation shall be $5,000. 6. Each violation of the Declaration, even if based on the same situation or animal, shall be considered a separate offense for the purpose of enforcement. 7. If an owner does not pay a fine which has been assessed due to a violation of the Declaration within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice to pay the fine, then the late payment or nonpayment shall be considered a separate offense for which the owner can be fined on the same terms as set above. 8. The fines collected under this section my be applied to the costs incurred by the Association to administer and enforce the Declaration. SUMMARY OF WILDLIFE IMPACTS Native Springs Subdivision will affect birds and small mammals associated with grasslandfhayland (e.g. western meadowlark, western kingbird, cottontail rabbit, deer mouse, meadow vole) and will affect mule deer. Because of the widespread availability of grasslandlhayland on Silt Mesa, the Native Springs Subdivision will not cause population declines of these birds and mammals. Foraging areas for mule deer will be reduced. However, mule deer will still have access to nearby undeveloped grasslands/haylands and shrublands on Silt Mesa. The prey base for coyotes, foxes, skunks, raccoons, crows, red-tailed hawks and owls will be diminished. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Paqe 22 Many species of wildlife have shown they are adaptable to residential developments, buildings, and human activities. There is experimental evidence to show that wildlife do habituate to humans (Knight and Skagen 1988). Habituation is defined as a waning of a response to a repeated stimulus that is not associated with either a positive or negative reward (Knight and Temple 1995, Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1970). Research suggests that some wildlife species may habituate to predictable events which they learn are not dangerous (Yarmoloy et al. 1988). There are many factors that influence wildlife responses to humans. These factors include characteristics of the disturbance and characteristics of the particular wildlife species. Characteristics of the disturbance that shape wildlife responses include the type of human activity, specific behaviors of a person, predictability, frequency and magnitude, timing, and location. Characteristics of wildlife that affect their response to humans include the type of animal, group size, age, sex, breeding status, and stage of breeding/nesting. The most important factors affecting wildlife response to humans re predictability and perceived threat. When wildlife perceive a disturbance frequent enough to be expected and nonthreatening, they show little overtresponse. If wildlife perceive disturbance as unpredictable and threatening, they react quite differently. anticipate that many of the existing species of wildlife on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision will acclimate to the presence of humans and to changes in habitat. A portion of the subdivision will likely consist of undeveloped areas. In my opinion, although there will be a reduction in the quantity and distribution of wildlife, existing wildlife species should still maintain a presence on the development. Many affected species will relocate to undeveloped areas of the development. Development Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Re ort for Native S •rin s Subdivision Pa e 23 of Native Springs Subdivision will not result in the loss of critical wildlife habitat, nor will it affect wildlife migration corridors. Retaining existing vegetation in those areas outside of building envelopes, lawns, and entrance roads will benefit wildlife. There are no federal or Colorado threatened, endangered, or candidate wildlife, or Colorado species of special concern, which will be significantly impacted by the subdivision. Development of the Native Springs Subdivision will have a local affect on individuals of common species of grassland birds and small mammals, and mule deer, but will not result in a loss of viability in the area, nor cause a trend to federal or state listing or loss of species viability within a wider area, nor cause a trend to federal or state listing or a loss of species viability rangewide. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Pa eg24 LITERATURE CITED Andrews, R. and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado birds. Denver Mus. Nat. History, Denver,. CO. 442pp. Eib1-Eibesfeldt, 1. 1970. Ethology: the study of behavior. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, N.Y. 530pp. Fitzgerald, J. P., C. A. Meaney, and D. M Armstrong. 1994. Mammals of Colorado. Univ. Press Colorado, Niwot, CO. 467pp. Hammerson, G. A. 1986. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Colo. Div. Wildlife, Denver, CO. 131 pp. Knight, R. L, and S. K Skagen. 1988. Effects of recreational disturbance on birds of prey: a review. Pages 355-359 in L. Glinski, ed. Proceedings of the Southwest Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C. , and S. A Temple. 1995. Origin of wildlife responses to recreationists. Pages 81-91 in R. L. Knight and K. J. Gutzwiller, eds. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Yarmoloy, C., M. Bayer, and V. Geist. 1988. Behavior responses and reproduction of mule deer following experimental harassment with an all -terrain vehicle. Canadian Field Naturalist 10:425-429. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision— P Table 1. Species of amphibians for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. Common Name Canyon treefrog Great Basin spadefoot New Mexico spadefoot Northern leopard frog Red -spotted toad Boreal toad Scientific Name Hyla arenicolor Spea intermontana Spea rnultiplicata Rana pipiens Bufo punctatus Bufo boreas boreas Federal Threatened or Endangered State Threatened or Endangered state Species of Special Concern X X X X X X Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 -lifeReport for #ive Springs 5ubdivision i= MI 111111 Table 2. Species of reptiles for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. Common Name Scientific Name Federal Threatened o Endangered Common kingsnake Lampropeltis getula Longnose leopard lizard Eastern fence lizard Midget faded rattlesnake Many -lined skink Milk snake Night snake Racer Short -horned lizard Southwestern blackhead snake Gambelia wislizenii Sceloporus undulatus Crotalus viridis concolor Eumeces multivirgatus Lanpropeltis triangulum Hypsiglena torquata Coluber constrictor Phrynosoma hernandezi Tantilla hobartsmithi r State Threatened or Endangered State Species of Special Concern Status' X S1 X S3 X S3 C2 1 C2 = Listed by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a Category 2 candidate in review. 81 = Listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state critically imperiled. S3 = Listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state rare. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc September, 2000 INE EM pa Wildlife Report for Native Springsrldivision Table 3. Species of mammals for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. Common Name American elk Big free -tailed bat Bighorn sheep Black bear Scientific Name Cervus elaphus Nyctinomops macrotis Ovis canadensis Ursus americanus Botta's pocket gopher Brazilian free -tailed bat Cliff chipmunk Desert shrew Dwarf shrew Fringed myotic Thomomys bottae Tadarida brasiliensis Tamias dorsalis Notiosorex crawfordi Sorex nanus Federal Threatened or Endangered State Threatened or Endangered State Species Status of Special Concern SI C2 51 53 52 53 Golden -mantled ground squirrel Great Basin pocket mouse Myotis thysanodes Spermophilus lateralis Perognathus parvus Kit fox Least chipmunk Lynx Merriam's shrew Moose Mexican vole Mountain lion Mule deer Northern Docket gopher Vulpes macrotis Tamias minimus Lynx Canadensis Sorex merriami Aces alces S3 S3 S2 S2 Threatened Endangered Endangered Microtus mexicanus Fells concolor Odocoileus hemionus Thomomys talpoides SI S2 51 S3 S3 S2 Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 _ 'P�'Ti dlife effort fotir►egsivi 0.1111=Pag Table 3. Species of mammals for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided (continued). Common Name Scientific Name Lutra Canadensis Dipodomys ordii Federal Threatened or Endangered State Threatened or Endangered Endangered State Species of Special Concern Status' 82 Northern river otter Ord's kangaroo rat Pronghorn Antilocapra americana Perognathus flavus sanluisi X S3 Silky pocket mouse Spotted bat Euderma maculatum X 82 C2 Thirteen -lined ground squirrel Spermophilus tridecemlineatus Plecotus townsendii pallascens X 82 C2 Townsend's big -eared bat Western harvest mouse _ Reithrodontomys megalotis megalotis X S2 White-tailed antelope squirrel Ammospermophilus leucurus Odocoileus virginianus _ X 82 White-tailed deer Neotoma albigula brevicauda Myotis yumanensis X S2 White -throated woodrat X 83 C2 Yuma myotis 1 C2 -- -- Listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a Category 2 candidate in review. 81 -- Listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state critically imperiled. S2 -- Listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state imperiled. S3 -- Listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state rare. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting' Inc. September, 2000 NMI 1• NMI MN l 1111. AIM MN parg 1 Wildlife Report for Native bprings buodivision Table 4. Species of birds for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided. Common Name Scientific Name Federal Threatened or Endangered State Threatened or Endangered State Species of Special Concern Status' S2B American peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus anatum American redstart Setophaga S1 B American white pelican Pelecanus eryihrorhynchos - X Si B American wigeon Anas americana Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened _ Threatened S1 B Bald eagle Barrow's golderieye Bucephala islandica X S2B Cypseloides niger S3B Black swift Black -crowned night heron Nycticorax nycticorax S3B Himantopus mexicanus Dendroica - S3B Black -necked stilt Black -throated gray warbler Black -throated sparrow Amphispiza bilenata S3B Blue grosbeak Guiraca caerulea Anas discors Blue -winged teal Bobolink Dolichonyx Aegolius funereus _ S3B Boreal owl Brewer's sparrow Spizella breweri Bufflehead Bucephala albeola Branta canadensis Aythya valisineria _ _ - _ Si B S2B Canada goose Canvasback Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 11♦diw�IT NM NM MI Inn MIN 111 N 11• Pap. 1 sp dIife ort or ativinq Table 4. Species of birds for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided (continued). Common Name Scientific Name Chestnut -collared Iongspur Calcarius omatus Chestnut sided warbler Cinnamon teal Dickcissel D ndroica pensylvanica Anas cyanoptera Spiza Americana Eared grebe Podiceps nigricollis Eastern phoebe Sayornis phoebe Ferruginous hawk Field sparrow Flarnmulated owl Buteo regalis Spizella pusilla Otus flammeolus Forester's tern Sterna forsteri Gadwall Grace's warbler Anas strepera Dendroica greciiae Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum Gray vireo Viroe vicinior Great blue heron Ardea herodias Great egret Greater sandhill crane Grus canadensis tabida Ardea albus Green heron Butarides virescens Green -winged teal Anas crecca Hepatic tanager Piranga flava Horned lark Eremophila alpestris Federal Threatened o Endangered State Threatened or Endangered State Species of Special Concern Status' 1 S1B S2B S3B 53B S3B S3B C2 S1B S2B S3B S2B S3B SIB S2B S3B S1B Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 9I'Llife ort Mafia" ing div i� — N MI I IM M papa N MN Table 4. Species of birds for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided (continued). Common Name Scientific Name Federal Threatened or Endangered State Threatened or Endangered State Species of Special Concern Status' Lark bunting Calamospiza melanocorys Lesser sandhill crane Grus canadensis canadensis Lewis woodpecker Melanerpes X S2B Long -billed curlew Numenius americanus Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Cistothorus palustris - S3B Marsh wren Merlin Falco columbarius Threatened Threatened _ - - Si B Merriam's wild turkey Meleagris gailopavo merriami Strix occidentalis lucida Mexican spotted owl Mountain plover Charadrius montanus X S2B C gentilis Circus cyaneus _ S3B C2 S3B Northern goshawkAccipiter Northern harrier Anas acuta Anas clypeata _ Northern pintail - Northern shoveler Pandion haliaetus Progne subis Vireo olivaceus Melanerpes erythrocephalus S3B Osprey S3B S3B Purple martin Red -eyed vireo S3B Red-headed woodpecker Ring -billed gull Larus delawarensis Phasianus colchicus Bonasa umbellus Ring-necked pheasant Ruffed grouse Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 r ill!lM MI =I MIMI 11=1MI 1111 MO i Pa OM NMI ar Wildlife Report ative prangs u divi Table 4. Species of birds for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided (continued). Common Name Scieni Rufous hummingbird Selasphor Sage grouse Centrocen urophasia+ urophasial Sage sparrow Amphispi2 Scott's oriole Icterus pa, Short -eared owl Asio flamr Snowy egret Egretta th, Southwestern willow flycatcher Empidona Swainson's hawk Buteo wai Three -toed woodpecker Picoides t Western burrowing owl Athene ct, hypugaea White-faced ibis Plegadis c White-tailed ptarmigan Lagopus 1 altipetens White -winged crossbill Loxia lent ific Name s rufus Federal State Threatened or Threatened or Endangered Endangered us us US a belli �sorum State Species of Special Concern X Status S3B eus la S3B S1B S2B S2B x trailii extimus asoni Tdactylus nicularia hihi eucrus Endangered Endangered Threatened optera C2 S2B C2 S1B Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 MO MN Ili NIM MI MO MI 1♦ PIM I= Pain NMI OM Wildlife Report for [Native Springs Subdivision Table 4. Species of birds for which existing or potential suitable habitat exists on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision as reported by the Natural Diversity Information Source. The status of individual species is also provided (continued). Common Name Scientific Name Whooping crane Willet Williamson's sapsucker Grus Americana Catoptrophorus semipalmatus inomatus Sphyrapicus thyroideus Federal Threatened or Endangered Endangered State Threatened or Endangered Endangered State Species of Special Concern Status' SIB 1 C -- Listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a Candidate species. C2 -- Listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a Category 2 candidate in review. SI B — Species listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state critically imperiled during the breeding season. S2B -- Species fisted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state imperiled during the breeding season. S3B -- Species listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program as state rare or threatened during the breeding season. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 34 Table 5. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern. Common Name Fish Bonytail Razorback sucker Humpback chub Colorado pikeminnow Greenback cutthroat trout Rio Grande sucker Lake chub Plains minnow Suckermouth minnow Northern redbelly dace Scientific Name Gilaelegans Xyrauchen texanus Gila cypa Ptychocheilus lucius Oncorhycnhus clarki sotmias Catostomus plebeius Couesius plumbous Hybognathus placitius Phenacobius mirabilis Phoxinus eos Phoxinus erythrogaster Hybognathus hankinsoni Luxilus cornutus Etheostoma cragini Southern redbelly dace Brassy minnow Common shiner Arkansas darter Bluehead sucker Flannelmouth sucker Mountain sucker Plains orangethroat darter Iowa darter Plains topminnow Rio Grande chub Colorado roundtail chub Speckled chub River shiner Stonecat Colorado River cutthroat trout Rio Grande cutthroat trout Flathead chub Amphibians Status' FE, SE FE, SE FE, ST FE, ST FT, ST SE SE SE SE SE Catostomus discobolus Catostomus latipinnis Catostomus platrhynchus Etheostoma spectible Etheostoma exile Fundulus sciadicus Gila pandora Gila robusta Macrhybopsis aestivalis tetranemus Notropis blennius Noturus flavus Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis Platygobio gracilus Bufo boreal boreal Boreal toad Northern cricket frog Great Plains narrowmouth toad Gastrophryne olivacea Acris crepitans SE ST ST ST TSC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SE SC SC Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision - pie 35 Table 5. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern (continued). Common Name Scientific Name Status Amphibians (continued) Canyon treefrog Hyla areicolor SC Northern leopard frog Plains leopard frog Couch's spadefoot Great basin spadefoot New Mexico spadefoot Reptiles Midget faded rattlesnake Longnose leopard lizard Yellow mud turtle Common kingsnake Texas blind snake Texas horned lizard Rana pipiens Rana blairi Scaphiopus courchii Spea intermontana Spea multiplicata Crotalus viridis concolor Gambeliia wislizenii Kinosternon flavenscens Lampropeltis Betula Leptotyphlops dulcis Phrynosoma cornutum SC SC SC SC SC rSC SC SC SC SC SC Desert spiny lizard Massasauga Sceloporus magister Sistrurus catenatus SC SC Birds American • - - # • Whooping crane Least tern Southwestern willow flycatcher Plains sharp -tailed grouse Piping plover Bald eagle Mexican spotted owl Falco peregrinus anatum Grus americana tabida Sterna antillarum athalassos Empidonax fraillli extimus Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesii Charadrius melodus circumcinctus Haliaeetus leucocephalus Western burrowing owl Greater sandhill crane Lesser prairie chicken Barrow's goldeneye Ferruginous hawk Gunnison's sage grouse Northern sage grouse Western snowy plover Mountain plover Long -billed curlew White pelican Strix occidentalis lucida Athene cunicularia Grus canadensis Tympanuchus pallidicinctus Bucephala islandica Buteo regalis Centrocercus urophasianus subspp. Centrocercus urophasianus subspp. Charadrius alexandrinus Chardrius montane Numenius americanus Pelecanus erythrorhynchos SC FE, SE FE, SE FE, SE SE FT, ST FT, ST FT, ST ST SC ST SC SC SC SC SC SC SC SC Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for Native Springs Subdivision Page 36 Table 6. Federal threatened and endangered species reported for Colorado. Status Common Name Scientific Name Grizzly bear Ursus arctos Bonytail chub Humpback chub Gila elegans Gila cypha Threatened Endangered Endangered Whooping crane Bald eagle Grus americana Haliaeetus Jeucocephalus Black -footed ferret Southwestern willow flycatcher Preble's meadow jumping mouse Lynx Mexican spotted owl Mustela nigripes Empidonax traillii extimus Zapus hudsonius preblei Lynx Canadensis Strix occidentalis lucida Piping plover Colorado squawfish Razorback sucker Charadrius melodus Ptychocheilus lucius Xyrauchen texanus Least tern Greenback cutthroat trout Gray wolf Mancos milk -vetch Osterhous milk -vetch Sterna antillarum Endangered Threatnened Endangered Endangered Threatened Threatened Threatened Oncorhynchus clarki stomias Clay -loving wild buckwheat Penland alpine fen mustard Dudley Bluffs bladderpod Knowlton cactus Penland beardtongue North Park phacelia Dudly Bluffs twinpod Unita Basin hookless cactus Mesa Verde cactus Ute ladies' -tresses Canis lupus Astragalus humilllmus Astragalus osterhoutii Threatened Endangered Endangered Endangered Threatened Endangered Endangered Eriogonum pelinophilum Eutrema penlandii Lesquerella congesta Pediocactus knowltonii Penstemon penlandii Endangered Endangered Threatened Threatened Phacelia formosula Physaria obcordata Sclerocactus giaucus Endangered Endangered Endangered Threatened Threatened Sclerocactus mease verdae Sprianthes diluvialis Threatened Threatened Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page El L Proposed Native Springs Subdivision loom u*, Stif Mb *ALI*. oRA0',C, :1 • .. 7 .... a— 1 17 Figure 1. Vicinity map showing location of the proposed Native Springs Subdivision ) in relationship to Silt, Colorado. Vq. a Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F2 RCS -IOU wRCe. - b RuIL0L - ---------- -LGL[ f Rullai tiLL{:vil, 7PC3 1I Figure 2. Lot layout for the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F3 1 1 1 1 1 County occurrence Kn own to d cc u r Lkelyto Occur Suitable H abitat User -Defined Area County Boundaries 1-1 h U a yrs �fM1 \/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 3. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the canyon treefrog and New Mexico spadefoot on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. ,Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F4 County Occurrence FM Known to Occur Lkalyto Occur Suitable H abtat User -Defined Area County Boundaries L H ig him ays Figure 4. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the red -spotted toad on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F5 County Occurrence Mr Known to Occur Lkety to Occur Suitable Habitat User•0efinei Area County Boundaries Highways Figure 5. Natural Diversity information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the Great Basin spadefoot and northern leopard frog on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Re ort for the Native S • rin ■ s Subdivision Pa s e F6 County Occurrence gm Known to Occur Lketyto Occur Suitable Habitat l User•Dfined Area A f,. County Boundaries Figure 6. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the common kingsnake on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F7 County Occurrence Kn own to O cc u r FT Lkefy to Occur Suitable 14abitat User -E efined Area ,f. County Boundaries Highways Figure 7. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the midget faded rattlesnake on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F8 County Occurrence ▪ Known to Occur • t_kety to Occur Suitable H abitat User -Defined Area County Boundaries Highways Figure 8. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for ©rd's kangaroo rat, desert shrew, and dwarf shrew on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F9 County Occurrence *� c r �; r t� -ham, ..5 Kn own to 0 oc u r, Lketyto Occur Suitable Habitat :1^w.;C""iir User -Defined Area County Boundaries Highways n rg�✓yam° • if g '' �hC ��,0 1. �� ,. l�rt��:. ,'Y.�. S �}s :.•t{7.Y (7� / Figure 9. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the kit fox on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F10 County Occurrence ® known to Occur Lkelyto Occur Suitable Habitat User -Defined Area A I County Boundaries Highways Figure 10. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the northern pocket gopher on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 County Occurrence ® Kn own to Occur 1-1 Lketyto Occur Suitable H abstat User -Defined Area r "sr` County Boundaries 11 Highways ti ver Figure 11. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for Botta's pocket gopher on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. 1 Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F12 Overall Activities Overall R ang e User•Defined Area County boundaries highways Figure 12. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped overall range for elk on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F13 Overall Activities a Overall R ange User•Defined Area County Boundaries Highways rr� Figure 13. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped overall range for mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F14 County Occurrence gigm Known to Occur f Lkeyto Occur Suitable Habitat User -Defined Area . r. County Boundaries Figure 14. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F15 Winter Activities ® Severe W inter Range Winter Concentration Area MR Winter Range User -Defined Area County Boundaries Highway Figure 15. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped winter activity areas for the mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F16 Other Activities 1 1 Concentration Areas Highway Crossing um Limited Use Area \.\\` Migration Corridor inin Resident Population Area User -Defined Area County Boundaries L_1 Highways ti r: Figure 16, Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped activity areas for the mule deer on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F17 Figure 17. Colorado Division of Wildlife lynx potential habitat (IM ) map. Source: www.ndis.nrel.colostate.eduiexcop/imagesimapsilynx.jpg. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F18 County Occurrence ® Knouun to 0ccur 71 Lkelyto, Occur Suitable Habitat User -Defined Area County Boundaries Hi9hvuays Figure 18. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the peregrine falcon, sage grouse, and southwestern willow flycatcher on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F19 County Occurrence known to Occur Lketyto Occur Suitable Habitat User -Defined Area ;ter County Boundaries Highways ., Figure 19. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the bald eagle and ferruginous hawk on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F20 County Occurrence Kn own to Occur l—� Lkety to Occur Suitable H abitat User•Def'sned Area County Boundaries Highways / v,r Figure 20. Natural Diversity Information Source (ND1S) mapped suitable habitat for the greater sandhill crane on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F21 County Occurrence ME Known to Occur Lkaty to Occur Suitable Habitat User -Defined Area CV/ County Boundaries L Highways Jh r Figure 21. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the Mexican spotted owl on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F22 County Occurrence Known to O cc u r Lketyto Occur Suitable Habitat User•©efined Area f '+l County Boundaries 1 1 H ig hw a ys /AV Figure 22. Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the whooping crane and mountain plover on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wildlife Report for the Native Springs Subdivision Page F23 County Occurrence ME Known to Occur Lkelyto Occur Suitable Habitat User -Defined Area County Boundaries Highways Figure 23. Natural Diversity information Source (NDIS) mapped suitable habitat for the western burrowing owl on the proposed Native Springs Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is bounded by the right-hand box. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. September, 2000 PROTECTIVE CO VENANTS DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION JAMES LUGENBUHL and PAUL LUGENBUHL, as the fee owners of Native Springs Subdivision (Subdivision), desiring to insure the development and continuity of the Subdivision as a residential subdivision, in accordance with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (C.R.S. 38-33.3--101, ec seq.) for themselves, their successors, legal representatives, assigns and grantees, hereby declare to and for the benefit of all persons who may hereafter purchase and from time to time own lots in the Subdivision that said ownership and holding of said lots shall be subject to the following protective covenants and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to be appurtenant to and run with the land and inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the owners of said lots, their heirs, successors and assigns. ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1. Subdivision. Whenever the term "Subdivision" is used in these covenants, it shall mean all the lands included within Native Springs Subdivision, and as described on the plat filed for record with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder as Reception No. The Subdivision shall commonly be known as "Native Springs Subdivision" and the homeowner's association shall be known by that name. 2. Residence. The term "Residence" as used herein shall mean single family dwellings only and shall exclude apartment houses, condominiums and any dwelling place containing more than one (1) family unit. 3. Residential Purpose. The term "Residential Purpose" as used herein shall be construed and held to include the use of a residence as a home and principal dwelling place by the owner thereof. Rental of said unit shall be permissible if rented by a single family. 4. Family. The term "single family" shall mean a household composed of (i) no more than two (2) principal adults, (ii) the children of one or both of said principal adults, and (iii) no more than two (2) additional family members (adults or children) who are related by blood to said principal adults. For purposes hereof, "related by blood" shall mean the following relationships: grandparents, parents, brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles and nephews and nieces. 5. Association. The term "Association" shall mean the Native Springs Homeowners' Association. The Association shall be a not-for- profit Colorado corporation formed for the purpose of operating the homeowner's association with the Subdivision. 1 6. Board. The term "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Association. 7. Common Area. of property which is Subdivision as common ar the Association as tru Springs Subdivision. The term "Common Area" shall mean a parcel identified on the recorded Plat of the ea. Such area shall be held in ownership by stee for all owners of Lots in the Native ARTICLE 11 MEMBERSHIP IN NATIVE SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION All persons or entities (other than the Association) who own or acquire the title in fee to any of the lands in the Subdivision shall automatically become members of the Association. The owner or owners of each lot shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each lot owned and shall be liable to pay assessments on the basis of ) of all assessments for each lot owned. ARTICLE 111 ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL 8. Plan Submittals. Before anyone shall commence the construction, remodeiirlg, addition to, or alteration of any building, swimming poo , wail, fence or other structure whatsoever, on any lot, there shall be submitted to the Board two (2) complete sets of the plans and specifications for said work, and no such structure or improvement of any kind shall be erected, altered, placed or maintained upon any lot unless and until the final plans, elevations and specifications therefor have received such written approval as herein p=o`T=ded. The plans and specifications sha_ . be submitted to the Board and approval received from the Board prior to application for a building permit from Garfield County or other public entity having jurisdiction thereof. Such plans shall include plot plans showing the location on the lot or property of the wall, fence or other such structure proposed to be constructed, placed, altered or maintained, and elevation of same, together with the proposed color schemes for roofs and exteriors thereof, indicating materials for the same. The Board shall have the right to refuse to approve any such plans or specifications which are not suitable or desirable, in its opinion, based upon these Protective Covenants and the Residential Architectural Design and Minimum Construction Standards for the Subdivision. 9. Method of Approval. The Board shall approve or disapprove the plans and specifications in writing within thirty (30) days from the receipt thereof. One (1) set of said plans and specifications, with the approval or disapproval, shall be retained by the Board for a period of three (3) years. In the event no action is taken to approve or disapprove such plans and specifications within said thirty (30) day period, the provision requiring approval of said plans and specifications shall be deemed to have been waived. 10. Board Not Liable. The Board shall not be responsible to any person or entity in any manner whatsoever for any defect in any 2 plans or specifications submitted or as revised by the Board, nor for any work done pursuant to the requested changes of said plans and specifications. ARTICLE 1V ASSESSMENTS 11. Assessments. Each lot owner shall be obligated to pay any and all assessments duly imposed by the Association in the percentage set forth in Article II above. To the extent the Association is responsible therefor, assessments may be duly levied for purposes necessary to promote the health, safety and welfare of the lot owners and residents of the Subdivision, including, but not limited to, payment of the expenses for maintaining and improving irrigation water; the security system for common facilities; maintenance of common facilities, water detention facilities and open space, including revegetation thereof; taxes, utility charges and insurance premiums applicable to the open space and common facilities; and all other costs of the operation of the Association and the performance of its various functions as set forth herein or required by law. Each owner cf any lot, by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not it is sc expressed in the deed, shall be deemed to covenant and agree with each other and with the Association to pay to the Association annual assessments for the purposes set forth herein and any special assessments for capital improvements or other matters provided for herein. 12. Annual Assessments. The total annual assessments against all lots shall be based upon advance estimates of cash requirements for the Association to provide for the payment of all estimated expenses arising from, or connected with, the functions of the Association as set forth herein and any other expenses or liabilities which may be regularly incurred by the Association for the benefit of the lot owners. 13. Special Assessments. In addition to the annual assessments authorized by this Article, the Association may levy a special assessment, payable over such a period as the Association may determine, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction or reconstruction, unexpected repair or replacement, or for any other expense, including a capital expense, incurred or to be incurred as provided in these Protective Covenants or the Articles or Bylaws of the Association. Any such special assessment shall be paid in the same prorated manner as annual assessments. 14. Adoption of Budget. Within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the annual budget, the Board of the Association shall mail a summary of the budget to all lot owners and shall set a date for a meeting of the lot owners to consider ratification of the budget not less than fourteen (14), nor more than sixty (60), days after mailing of the summary. Unless at the meeting seventy-five percent (75%) of all lot owners reject the budget, the budget shall be ratified. In the event the proposed budget is rejected, the 3 budget last ratified by the lot owners shall be continued until a subsequent budget is proposed and ratified. 15. Notice of Assessments. The Association shall give written notice to each lot owner, sent to that owner's address as it appears on the records of the Association, as to the amount of any annual assessment with respect to his lot on or before twenty (20) days prior to the date upon which that assessment shall be due and payable. Failure of the Association to give timely notice of any assessment as provided herein shall not affect the liability of the lot owner for such assessment, but the date when payment shall become due in such case shall be deferred to a date twenty (20) days after such notice shall have been given. Except as otherwise determined by the Board, notice of special assessments shall be in accordance with the procedures set forth herein for annual assessments or in accordance with such other procedures as may be determined by the Board of Directors. All assessments shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from due date until paid. 16. Enforcement of Assessments. Any delinquent assessment may be enforced or collected in any one or combination of manners set forth in these Protective Covenants. The pursuit of any course of action as a means of collecting or enforcing an assessment shall not be deemed to waive the right of the Association to pursue any other method, either at the same time or subsequently. No owner may exempt himself from liability for his contribution toward any assessment by waiver of the use or enjoyment of any benefit of lot ownership of Association membership or by abandonment of his lot. The Association, and it alone, shall be charged with the responsibility of collecting and enforcing any delinquent assessment and, regardless of the means it employs to do so, the lot owner or other person charged with responsibility for any assessment shall pay the attorney's fees and costs incurred by the Association in collecting and enforcing the assessment. 17. Personal Obligation of Lot Owner and Purchaser. All sums assessed by the Association, together with interest, attorney's fees and costs, shall constitute a lien on the lot assessed, which lien shall be superior and prior to all other liens and encumbrances, excepting only: 1. liens and encumbrances recorded before the recordation of this Declaration; 2. a security interest on the lot which has priority over all other security interests on the lot and which was recorded before the date on which the assessment sought to be enforced became delinquent; provided, however, the lien created by this paragraph shall be prior to such security interest to the extent of the assessments based on the budget of the Association which would have become due, in the absence of any acceleration, during the six (6) months immediately preceding institution by either the Association or any party holding a lien senior to any part of the lien of the Association created under this paragraph of an action or a non -judicial foreclosure either to enforce or to extinguish the lien; 4 r 3. liens for real estate taxes and other governmental assessments or charges against the lot; Recording ,f this Declaration shall constitute record notice and perfection of the lien of the Association. No further recordation of any claim of lien for assessments shall be required. A lien created under this paragraph, however, shall be extinguished unless proceedings to enforce the lien are instituted within six (6) years after the full amount of the assessments become due. Such lien may be enforced by foreclosure of the defaulting owner's lot by the Association in the same manner in which mortgages on real property may be foreclosed in Colorado. The lot owners shall be required to pay the Association any assessments against the lot which become due during the period of foreclosure and these assessments shall be automatically included in the amount of the lien. The Association shall have the power to bid on the lot at the foreclosure sale and to acquire and hold, convey, lease, encumber, use or otherwise deal with the lot. 18. Statement of Unpaid Assessments. The Association shall furnish tc a lot owner or such lot owner's designee, or to a holder of a security interest or its designee, upon: written request delivered personally or by certified mail, first class, postage prepaid, return receipt to the Association's registered agent, a written statement setting forth the amount of unpaid assessments currently levied against such owner's unit. The statement shall be furnished within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the request and is binding on the Association, the Board of Directors and every lot owner. If no statement is furnished to the lot owner or holder of a security interest or their designee, delivered personally or by certified mail, first class, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the inquiring party, then the Association shall have no right to assert a lien upon the lot for unpaid assessments which were due as of the date of the request. ARTICLE V ANIMA.LS 19. Household Pets. 1. Residents may keep no more than one (1) dog and two (2) cats as household pets and any offspring of such household pets not exceeding three (3) months of age so long as such pets are not kept for commercial purposes and do not make objectionable noises or otherwise constitute a nuisance or inconvenience to any of the residents of the Subdivision. 2. Household pets shall be subject to any rules and regulations which may be promulgated by the Board. 3. Pets shall be confined to the lot of the resident by an above -ground fence; invisible electric fence attached to a dwelling unit; kennel; tether attached to a fixed, immovable object, the length of which will not allow the dog to trespass 5 on another resident's lot; or a leash. Areas where a lot owner keeps any pets shall be kept clean and free of refuse, insects and waste at all times. 4. Pets shall be on a leash and under the control of the owner when off the lot and not allowed to run freely outside of the resident's lot. 5. No commercial breeding activities of any kinds shall be permitted within the Subdivision. 6. Pets shall not be allowed to chase or molest wildlife or any domestic animals or persons, destroy or disturb property of another, or threaten public safety. 7. All pets should be licensed as required by law. 8. Dogs shall not be allowed to bark continuously, which shall be defined as barking for a fifteen (15) minute period, including successive barks or a series of barks which repeat or resume following a brief or temporary cessation. 9. Residents of each lot shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the regulations set forth herein of any dog inhabiting their lot with their permission. Residents not in compliance with the regulations set forth herein shall be responsible for any and all costs associated with the enforcement of these regulations. 10. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no pets may be kept within a lot or the residence which, in the good faith judgment of the Board, results in any annoyance or is obnoxious to lot owners within the Subdivision. 20. Livestock. Initially, the only livestock which shall be allowed in the Subdivision shall be horses and cattle. Lot owners shall be entitled to own no more than three (3) such animals per each Lot owned. The Board of Directors may authorize livestock other than horses and cattle and to increase or decrease the allowed number thereof by an amendment to this Declaration to be adopted as provided hereinafter. Any hay stored on a lot shall be secured by a tarp, stored in a structure or fenced. 21. Disposal of Animal Carcasses. The Association shall be responsible for the removal and disposal of all animal carcasses (e.g., deer, raccoons) located in the Subdivision. 22. Colorado Division of Wildlife. The Association, the Board of Directors and all lot owners shall waive and hold the Colorado Division of Wildlife harmless from any and all claims to damages to landscaping improvements, fencing, ornamental and native plants, and garden plants resulting from activities of wildlife. 23. Enforcement. 1. Any owner violating any of the covenants, conditions 6 and/or restrictions set forth in this Article shall receive a written warning of any such violation. 2. If said violation is not corrected or a second violation of the same type occurs within one (1) calendar day after receiving notice (or such reasonable time as is necessary in order for the owner to correct the violation, in the sole discretion of the Board), a fine of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) shall be assessed against the lot owner. 3. Upon the occurrence of a third violation of the same type or the continuation of a violation in excess of two (2) calendar days after receipt of notice, a fine of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) shall be assessed against the owner. 4. Upon the occurrence of a fourth violation of the same type or the continuance of a violation in excess of four (4) calendar days after receipt of notice, a fine of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) will be assessed against the owner. In addition, the Board may take such action as is reasonably necessary to cause the violation to cease, including entry upon the owner's lot. 5. Any animal which is in violation may be removed from the owner's property for disposal if prohibited or for a period of one (1) or more weeks if the animal is permitted but is in violation. Enforcement of animal violations will be made only with respect to the express provisions of this Declaration or any rules and regulations adopted by the Board. 6. For each additional recurrence of the same type of violation, or if a violation continues beyond sixty (60) days after an owner receives notice, an additional fine will be assessed in an amount equal to double the amount of the previous fine. 7. With respect to a continuing violation, the additional fine will be assessed every four (4) calendar days beyond the sixty (60) day period during which the violation continues. The aggregate amount of fines which may be charged against an owner for the recurrence or continuation of one type of violation shall be Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 8. Each violation of this Article or any subsequent rules or regulations adopted by the Board, even if based on the same situation or animal, shall be considered a separate offense for the purpose of enforcement. 9. If an owner does not pay a fine which has been assessed due to a violation of this Articles or any subsequent rules and regulations adopted by the Board within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice to pay the fine, then the late payment or nonpayment shall be considered a separate offence for which the owner can be fined on the same terms as set above. 10. The fines collected under this section may be applied 7 to the costs incurred by the Association to administer and enforce this Declaration or any rules or regulations adopted by the Board. ARTICLE VI GENERAL RESTRICTIONS ON USE 24. Zoning Regulations. No lands within the Subdivision shall ever be occupied or used by or for any structure or purpose or in any manner which is contrary to the applicable zoning regulations of the County of Garfield, Colorado. Accessory Dwelling Units ("ADCs") shall be permitted on any Lot at least four (4) acres in size as long— as ong—as each ADO otherwise complies with the standards applicable to ADUs set forth in the Garfield County zoning Regulation of 1978, as amended. 25. Resubdivision. No lot described in the plat of the Subdivision shall ever be resubdivided into smaller lots or tracts, nor conveyed or encumbered in any less than the full original dimensions as shown an said recorded plat. 26. Business, Commercial or Trade Uses. No lands in the Subdivision shall ever be occupied or used for any commercial, business or trade purpose and nothing shall be done on any of said lands which is a nuisance or might become a nuisance to the owner or owners of said lands, with the exception, however, that the use of a portion of the lands for sale of lots by the Declarant shall be permitted. Use of a residence for a business purpose shall be authorized provided such use is non -observable from other lots, does not generate any vehicular traffic or noise and does not alter the premises in any fashion. 27. Signs. No advertising or signs of any character shall be erected, placed, permitted or maintained on any lot or structure within the Subdivision other than one (1) "For Sale" or "For Rent" sign not to exceed two (2) feet by three (3) feet in size approved by the Board and a name plate and street number of the occupant. 28. Fences. The maximum height of fences shall be forty-two (42) inches. All rail fences and 3 -strand wire fences shall have a twelve (12) inch separation between the top two rails or wires. Catch corral fences enclosing less than five thousand (5,000) square feet of area are exempt from these fencing standards. Chain link fences up.to six (6) feet high will be allowed for the purpose of kenneling a dog. A six (6) feet high privacy fence may be used to enclose a contiguous area of not more than two thousand (2,000) square feet when located immediately adjacent to a residence. Prior to construction of any fence, plans shall be submitted to the Board pursuant to Article IIIA hereof and approved by the Board. 29. Storage and Trash. No above ground oil, gas or water tanks shall be permitted on any lot. No storage of junk automobiles, machinery, appliances, junk piles, scrap piles and other materials shall be permitted on any lot except in an enclosed structure. Garbage and trash shall be secured in receptacles, which receptacles 8 shall be kept in a sanitary condition and comply with recommendations as may be made from time to time by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. No grass, shrub or tree clippings, refuse, garbage, trash, plant waste, scrap, rubbish, or debris of any king shall be kept, stored, maintained or allowed to accumulate or remain on any lot except temporarily within an enclosed structure within the building envelope. 30. Underground Utility Lines. All utility pipes and lines within the limits of the Subdivision must be buried underground and may not be carried on overhead poles nor above the surface of the ground. All such services must be buried underground from the point where said utilities take off from transformers and terminal points supplied by the developer. 31. Construction of Dwelling House. All construction and alteration work shall be prosecuted diligently, and each building, structure or improvement which is commenced on any residential lot shall be completed within nine (9) months from the commencement of construction. No persons may live in or use as a dwelling place a partially constructed building. In the event of a breach of this covenant, the Declarant and/or the Association shall have the right to complete cons=ruction of any uncompleted building, structure and improvement at the cost and expense of the Owner, which cost and expense shall become a lien against the property the same as a lien for assessments and which may be enforced as a lien for assessments_ 32. Temporary Structures. No temporary house, trailer, tent, garage or outbuilding shall be placed or erected upon any part of any lot in the Subdivision; provided, however, that during the actual construction of any improvement on any lot, a necessary temporary building for the storage of materials may be erected and maintained by the person doing the construction. 33. Towers and Antennas. No towers or radio and television antennas shall be erected or permitted to remain on any residential lot within the Subdivision except that television antennas attached to a dwelling house may project up to six (6) feet above the ground. 34. Cleanliness and Unsightly Growth. Each lot shall at all times be kept in a clean, sightly and wholesome condition. No trash, litter, junk, boxes, containers, bottles, cans, implements, machinery, lumber or other building materials shall be permitted to remain exposed on any lot so as to be visible to any neighboring lot or road. 35. Motor Homes, Trailers and Boats. No motor homes, trailers or boats shall be stored or parked in the Subdivision; provided, however, motor homes, trailers or boats may be parked on a lot or adjoining street to ready, load or unload for a period not to exceed seventy-two (72) hours. 36. Fireplaces and Stoves. No open hearth, solid fuel devices will be allowed anywhere within the Subdivision. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning fireplaces or appliances. All dwelling units will be allowed one (1) 9 new woodburning stove as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et. seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 37. ISDS Operation and Maintenance Standards. 1. Responsibility: The owner and the party in possession of real property upon which an individual sewage disposal system is used, shall be jointly and severally responsible for operation and maintenance of the system unless jurisdiction for responsibility has been transferred to a public, quasi -public, or political subdivision. The person denying such responsibility shall bear the burden of proof for such denial upon establishment of ownership or possessory rights in the property served by the system. 2. Service Label: For treatment plants utilizing mechanical apparatus or under a service policy, a clearly visible, permanently attached label or plate giving instructions for obtaining service shall be placed at a conspicuous location. 3. Maintenance and Cleaning: When directed by the local health department, for the purpose of obtaining compliance with rules and regulations, the owner or user of a system shall provide for maintenance and cleaning of an individual sewage disposal system and shall notify the local health department upon completion of any maintenance work and report to said department and submit such evidence of compliance with any maintenance and cleaning schedule in the form and as the department requires. a. The local board of health may adopt rules and regulations for the scheduling of maintenance and cleaning of systems and practices adequate to insure proper functioning of acceptable systems, and may require proof of proper maintenance and cleaning, pursuant to any such schedules and practices, to be submitted periodically to the local department of health by the owner of the system. 4. Monitoring and Sampling: a. Reasonable periodic collection and testing by the local health department of effluent samples from individual sewage disposal systems for which monitoring of effluent is necessary in order to insure compliance with the provisions of rules and regulations may be performed not more than two times a year, except when required by the health officer in conjunction with an enforcement action. b. Any owner or occupant of property on which an individual sewage disposal system is located may request the local health department to collect and test an effluent sample from the system.. The local health department may perform such collection and testing services. c. If the local health department collects and tests effluent samples, a fee not to exceed that which is allowed by 25-10-101 et. seq. (as amended) C.R.S. 1973, may be charged for each sample collected and tested. Payment of such charge may be stated in the permit as a condition for its continued use. 10 5. Disposal of Waste Materials: Disposal of waste materials removed from a system in the process of maintenance or leaning shall be accomplished at a site approved by local county officials in a manner which does not create a hazard to the public health, a nuisance or an undue risk of pollution and which complies with state and local rules and regulations. (See Sludge Regulations and Solid Waste Regulations.) 6. No Discharge is Permitted Which Does not Comply With Rules and Regulations: No sewage or effluent shall be permitted to be discharged into or upon the surface of the ground or into state waters unless the sewage system and effluent meets the minimum requirements of applicable rules and regulations. 7. Termination of Use of System: The contents of a septic tank, vault, or seepage pit, the use of which has been terminated, shall be properly disposed of whereupon the emptied tank, vault, or pit shall be filled with soil or rock, or the health officer may require the tank or vault to be removed and disposed of properly. 38. Weed Control / Vegetation Management Plan. The Association shall implement and follow a program of noxious weed control which may address, the control and elimination of Canadian Thistle and other plant species included on the Garfield County Noxious Weed List. In general, the weed management plan should consists of the following components: 1. Prevention and Control: The quick revegetation of disturbed areas with weed free grass seed and the maintenance of native or introduced vegetation in a healthy, vigorous condition producing optimum vegetative densities will leave noxious weeds little opportunity to establish. The use of hay that is certified as weed free is also recommended. 2. Inventory: Each lot should be inspected to identify any infestations of noxious weeds. An accurate record should be keep of the application and success of weed infestation eradication efforts. 3. Eradication: Elimination of noxious weeds is can be achieved through: a. Mechanical Controls physically remove the entire weed plant or eliminates the plant's ability to produce seed. b. Biological Controls rely on organisms (insects or plant pathogens) to interfere with weed growth. c. Chemical Controls use herbicides to eliminate weeds. Special care must be used with herbicides to avoid damage to desirable plant species and to avoid contamination of ground water. An effective weed management program may involves all three methods of eradication as will as a long term commitment to prevention and control. Assistance in the development and implementation of a weed management program is available through the Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Service and from the Garfield County Office of Vegetation Management. 11 It is the individual lot owner's responsibility, according to the Colorado Noxious Weed Act and Garfield County's Weed Management Plan, to manage any noxious weeds on his or her property. In the event a property owner fails to effectively control noxious weeds on their Lot, the Association shall have the right to enter upon any Lot and conduct a weed control program within the area of such Lot. 4. Vegetation Management Plan. The Association has obtained a Vegetation Management Plan for Native Spring Subdivision, prepared by Beach Environmental, LLC. A copy of this plan is available for inspection at the office of the Association. Said Vegetation Management Plan is incorporated herein as if set forth verbatim. The Association shall implement and follow a program of vegetation management as outlined by said Vegetation Management Plan, as the same now exists of may be amended or supplemented from time to time. 39. Water Quality Monitoring. Each well shall be constructed. in accordance with State of Colorado Water Well Construction rules and regulations. Water quality tests shall be preformed based an applicable Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the Environmental Protection Agency standards for the service level assigned to each well. As a minimum the Association will select one well within the subdivision that will be tested on a semi-annual basis for: bacteria, nitrates, pesticides and herbicides. 40. Fire Suppression Sprinklers Required. Each residential dwelling shall be equipped with fire suppression sprinklers in accordance with the standards of ASPA 13-R. 41. Wildfire Prevention. The guidelines of the Colorado State Forester for wildfire prevention as presently specified in the pamphlet titled "Widlfire Prevention in the Wildland Urban Interface" prepared by the Colorado State Forest Service (C.S.F.S.#143-691) or any successor document shall be followed in the construction of all Improvements. ARTICLE VII EASEMENTS RESERVED Easements and rights of way in perpetuity are hereby reserved for the erection, construction, maintenance and operation of wires, cables, pipes, irrigation structures, conduits and apparatus of the transmission of electrical current, telephone, television and radio lines and for the furnishing of water and gas in the street or for the furnishing of other utility purposes, together with the right of entry for the purpose of installing, maintaining and improving said utilities along, across, upon and through all platted easements in the Subdivision. ARTICLE VIII COMMON AREA The Common Area shall be operated and controlled by the Board of Directors for the benefit of all Lot owners. The Board of Directors 12 shall adopt rules and regulations governing the use of the Common Area and distribute a copy thereof to each. Lot owner at the time they purchase a Lot. The rules and regulations may thereafter be amended to provide for such changes in use and operation as time and experience in operating the Common Area shall dictate. ARTICLE IX ENFORCEMENT 37.Judicial Relief. Any violation of the provisions, conditions or restrictions contained herein shall authorize the Declarant, the Association or any lot owner to apply to any court of law or equity having jurisdiction thereof for an injunction or proper relief in order to enforce the same. No delay on the part of the Declarant or any other person in the exercising of any right, power or remedy contained herein shall be construed as a waiver thereof or an acquiescence therein. Various rights and remedies of all persons hereunder shall be cumulative and the Declarant, the Association or any lot owner may use any or all of said rights without in any way affecting the ability of the Declarant, the Association of any lot owner to use or rely upon or enforce any other right. Any lot owner found by a court to have violated these covenants shall be liable to the prosecuting party for all costs, including attorney fees. 38. Declarant's Right to Remedy Violations. If the owner of any lot shall default in the performance of any covenant or condition hereof or shall violate any of the covenants or rules herein contained, the Declarant or the Association may, after thirty (30) days notice to said owner, or without notice if in the opinion of the Declarant or Association an emergency exists, perform such covenant or condition or remedy such violation for the account and at the expense of the said owner. If the Declarant or Association shall incur any expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees in instituting, prosecuting (including an action against an owner for default or violation), or defending any action or proceeding instituted by reason of any default or violation, said expenses shall be included and added to any judgment made or given to the Declarant or Association. ARTICLE X GENERAL PR©VIS IONS 39. Covenants to Run with Land, All the restrictions and covenants contained herein shall constitute covenants running with the land as to all of the lands within the Subdivision. It shall continue to be binding upon the owners of said lands and in all persons claiming by, through or under said owner for a period of twenty-one (21) years from the date this document is filed for record with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado; provided, however, that the owners of seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots in the Subdivision may release all of the lots hereby restricted from any one or all of these restrictions by executing and acknowledging an appropriate instrument in writing for said purpose and filing the same for record with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, in the manner then required for the recording of land 13 instruments. 40. Benefit of All. The provisions contained herein are for the benefit of and shall be binding upon. the Declarant and the purchasers and subsequent owners of each of said lots. Each purchaser of lots included within this Declaration, by acceptance of a deed to same, shall be subject to each and all of the restrictions, conditions, covenants and agreements contained herein and to the jurisdiction, right and power of the Declarant. By acceptance hereof by each owner, such owner shall for himself, his heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, covenant and agree and consent to and with the grantees and subsequent owners of each of said lots, to keep, observe, comply with and perform said restrictions, covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein. 41. Notices. All notices given hereunder to lot owners affecting the Subdivision shall be given by regular United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each owner at the address as it appears on the records of the Association. 42. Variances. The Declarant hereby reserves the right to grant a reasonable variance or adjustment of these conditions and restrictions in order to overcome practical difficulties and prevent unnecessary hardships arising by reason of the application of the restrictions contained herein. Such variances or adjustments shall be granted only in case the granting thereof shall not be materially detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements of the neighborhood and shall not defeat the general intent and purpose of these restrictions. 43. Amendments. The restrictions and covenants herein contained may be amended by the affirmative vote of the owners of seventy-five percent (75%) of the owners of the lots in the Subdivision and shall be effective upon the recordation of the amendments in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. 44. Compliance with C.C.I.O.A. These Covenants are intended to comply with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, C.R.S. 38- 33.3-101, et seq., and shall be interpreted .in light of the provisions of such act. 45. Severability. In the event any one or more of the provisions, conditions, restrictions or covenants contained herein shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be null and void, all remaining restrictions and covenants herein set forth shall remain in full force and effect. 46. Limited Liability. Neither the Association, nor the Board of Directors of the Association, nor any member, agent or employee of any of the same shall be liable to any party for any action or for any failure to act with respect to any matter if the action taken or failure to act was in good faith and without malice. Dated this 14 day of JAMES LUGENBUHL STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF PAUL LUGENBUHL The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , by James Lugenbuhl and Paul Lugenbuhl. My Commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public 15 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLANS NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO • 7 F'.: 6Di7NTY ROAD 2Y1:' _ 7 7- 1 A' • I1 i • .. -- •- e .1 \ PROJECT LAYOUT SCALE; s.' = 150' '.I Vi Ir: 5EZ0%5 T &I1 rp0b,5r3�5 55,�R�ANGGE4i W. F141N A 7 MAP SC :CC.' SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER TITLE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. COVER SHEET PLAT GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN NATIVE SPRINGS DRIVE PLAN AND PROFILE MASTER UTILITY PLAN DETAIL SHEET OWNERS: JIM AND PAUL LUGINBUHL PO BOX 950 BASALT. COLORADO 81621 PHONE: (970) 923-2408 FAX: (970) 923-2406 ENGINEER: HIGH COUNTRY ENGInE IING, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 923 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-8676 PLANNER: LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP 916 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 61601 PHONE: (970) 945-2246 FAX: (970) 945-4066 1 1 1 1 1 OWES 9. 1545 WIVE, 15 a*5E0 ON ALTA/PCNA 970010 PPEpAREfi Br Per R-110L1NTAM (1991901980 ,w.. DATE° AIL* 14, 199! .400 uPDA1ED 9r A FIELD MONEY PERFORMED 1* 0(C(WBER 1999 AND ,4141*AY AND FE9R*A1111 2390 1140 111Ar 9A1RANFY DEED 9ECOROE° 6 DYE REDDR05 OF 140 WAN AND 000ROE9 FL1R CA RTELO 4,711917, COLORADO O0 MARE* 27° 2000, .9 800! 1176 AT PAGE 453-054 1040 RECEPTION 90. 351130 3 9495 OF FIEAR•NGS FOR 11975 999501 1S A DEAAWG OF TRIS NORTH DEFINED Br GPS OB$RVA1109, 1ELD7G A 9EAWN0 OF S 3977'40` W 40130IR DIE MAIN C4ARTER 0006F(R *4' SECTION 1i A 2-1/2' ALUMINUM CAP L5 *0. 1.0071 AND ME N9RM3E51 CORNER DF SECTION 11 A 3-1/2` COUNTY SURVEYOR 549A55 GAP. 3 THE REAL PROPERTY 0E5C'R16E0 +40009 15 SUMO, TO THE TR/IS. PROVISIONS AN0 30190140 D0 (•) GARFELD C04RY APPROVAL 0CSOL3TION NO. CAPTIONED •A 9(50 017LN GONCLRNED PIN THE APPROVAL OFA PRELANNARY PLAT FOR 1040 9000E 5PF5N05 9390Nsaoi RE(OR0(0 71* BOOS AT PACE AND REM -POOH N0. AND (:) RIE OECL7R01904 1X C01E1AN15 GONDIRON4 9EsIRGI1ON5 A1C EA5EME5r5 FOR ME 5005E 5P1*005 0.9005109 REC0RDE0 44 scot AT PAGE ANO 4ECEp109 NO. (ME905 '0110 •PR0TEC11VE COVE*AN15'). -HAT ALL E7%15E TOR STRUT WA191EMA10E SHALL 9E +'1RW51E0 BY THE NAT11E SPR4C5 5150111505 'ROPER'* OWNERS AS5O04509.:NC. NOT 91 THE COI;NTY aF GARFIELD 5, GRAONG FOR 5ON'E9ANCE OF 510954 *ATEA AWAY FRO. 5F1VC1URE5 5HAL1 0E ^4E 9FSPO498+LITY 7 1401 LOT 0141IER, AL1 O*NER'0 SHALL ALLOW FOR COAEYANCE OF 5108. RATER :111!0401 *1EM -:.01. 1 5 9414.1190 EI.NELOPES ARE AS CALLED NO 09 1105 0141 1 7 11.E 7ND10D3AL Lor 1991(95 9*ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 95.E CON 1445L OF , [f• 1.01°0415 REEDS %- I 0 ORE (N) DOG PILL SE 4LLOMEO FOR EACH 9(90(5000 180* VONT 000 95.E •=3.199919 ARO 14+0 DOC FNAu. BE 9EDJ19ED TO SE CO*1N+ED TATA :.E 114 0.11 5 PROPERTY 90 4.04900. RATA EN0C90(1(91 PRONSCNS ALL0944C FOR 14.E REMO0AL 9F A DOG FROM 'HE 40(0 AS A FINAL REMEDY IN WORST CASES. 11 2008 10 O iSSLIMM OF A 9411.045 PERM% EACH LOT MEL 9E 5(A%EO AND CER11f1(D Br A REGISTERED LA110 SURVE*OR VERIFYING 811LM*0 LOCADON* RM6 APP900(3 ENVELO.E. ACCE55ORY DWELLING NUTS {'ADVS1 SHALL 9E PERMr`ED ON LO05 1-19, EACH AD1 SHALL COMPLY MTH :VIE STANDARDS 4RP9CNEKE 10 404'5 SET F0R14 001110'.D 00M909 070143 1E5104009 OF 19.76, 25 01E50E3, 0E0 (0 OO9E TESSTG D (AN (09,1 1p,+ ¢TEATME9IT 50157(01 1D BE EN> L 7 F99 A 90 99 5000 E1 4,7 1111> [ii_R-.1771 140*TT ^2. SOLS 1(599VIC AVID CEDTECNRICAL REPORI PARD 010 NEPNO1TH-PAW6A6 Ci01E:RA0AL. PIC DATED 24//21110 19, 2001, JOB 90. )00063 13 .NERAL 957405. GEORGE 7. 09(04 A40 ARDS A GREE.'+. 0603 COUNTS ROAD 321. 47FL, CGL9RA043 99650 14, OPEN 16ARP. 524.10-F1EL 10EPLACE5 NALL 9E ALLONEG 4NYNt+ERE 001111*9 `i 0* 9001510*. ONE (N) +0E* SCu3-1'LLEL 949511193 STOVE A5 DEPTTED 101 G9-5- ' 7-401. £T. 5E... AN4 FHE 9EC2LA110195 P90\R14GA1(G 1ME9E455E9° MX BE µL00[0 79 Aar ClaELLWG 1141 A4, 719&0,111° 41NTS Nf1, 00 AL106(4 AN Ld1ES:FPCIE0 11165M 0< 5A149AL OAS 98490 STOVES ANO APPL3AIKE5, R9*0*11DN 01045 4190 01TEH EASEMENTS ARE TO 9E REC002303 AND TAINEs AS *015190 ARO •N PLACE. 24 ME 'y54AL 11AH5E9. 1 ALL EXTERIOR 7101019° .ALL BE THE 914017111 A4A94NT NECESSARY ANO AL. 1(8109 GH141W RILL 5E 3.10:203 MEMO, 0*AR05 'ME .NITRDR R+E 540011510*. EXCEPT C.AE PR0111'50N5 WAY OE WADE FD ALLOW FOR SAFETY Lp01NC THAT COES BE'RND : E 99OP€917 BOU140AR0E5, 11 1 / .90 FL1111009 0149045 991HIN THE 5U90N5101: PILL BE ALIT/WED 1„%0x 00 004 15 A '97011 11 TO *9514` STATE 73854ANT TO C.R.S. 35.-3-101. ET, D. LA1*DOYITFERS. 9ESC6515 ADC 919T0R5 11351 BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT NNE 4('T*DE5 SON9S 504505 AR0 SPELLS OF CARFELD (Q 1105 00840*L1URAL SRA5095 A5 A NORWA,. AMO NECESSARY ASPECT Or 001193.5 A 040910 8014. A STRONG R,R1L 0,ARAC1'(R ARO A HEALTH., *4NC9v00 5EC109 ALL w5T 9E PREPARED 90 E90.0W4YER REAM*. MM. uGHTS 4,40, 0451, 5µ511E LHEWIGAL5. 114[110(4' O*1 PL9L20 0040'5 U905T008 ON R484G ROADS, STORAGE AND 0SPOSAL OF 8AN0.RE, AND THE A4PL*1*RNe BY SPRAIING OR 011.ERM50 OF CHEMICAL F(00.3090. SOL A.C60MENT5 HER9130E5, ANO PE5DODE5 ANY ONE OR 11095E OF 119CI4 WAY NATURALLY OCCUR A5 A PAR, OF A LEGA. 4100 V96P-I(LLGENT AGR1C4t'49µ OP(RAITONS. . ALL OYA+fRS OF TANG. MENU RA9C5 OR RESIDENCE 19191E 14614411044 046304 5141E u. 390 CO0*rT 9EGUA10N5 '1µ114 REGARD TO THE .Aw1ENANCE Of FENCT5 *NO RmGA(ON 07101(5. C091+O33413 ACCTS 4EEP753 4'VE5TOOL ARD 00:5 OER 00R'RO., 4990 PROPERF'F .4 ACCCROA*CE 8014 1010. 450 OTHER ASPECTS OF 1.950 ASD NAIM1A4P50 PROPERTY. 9E540ER'IS AC LA400.4ERS AME ERcGLIRA((D YD 10,889 46941 ',HESE 91°915 4*A} RESRO4518R,TIE5 ASD ACT A5 GOOD NE CHBOVS ANO 0 52095 Of •14 COLN,Y. A GOO .11110WCTORY 5OURGE cOR 540: 1F0ibA1109 5 'A WOE TO 1I.3µ 41Aµ0 1 51.FALL SIGH( 031144011dTE' Por 0311 6T 'NE EO.D4430 STAVE ...WARD, EVERSON arra 'R GARFIELD CO0R90. KNOW ALL WEN 99 0X1(5( 195(5(615. LOT 90 9 10 r1 AREA (AC*) 4.605. 5.173 5.)77 5.191 7.379 6,130 5.6,7 5.099 5,474 +,172 607 LA10 VSE S!. 701 209E A/R/90 A/RA/R/8O A/1/RD 4/1 �v /3o A/R/RD PRELIMINARY PLAT NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTIONS 2 AND 11, T.6S., R.93W, OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF . 89'28'38' w ADDRESS 002 NATIVE SPR NGS OI*VE 004 NA11VE 5PR NGS 7110E 012 NA14VE SPR 905 7110E 014 94110( SPR RCVS WIFE 016 RA1000 SPR 905 MINE 020 +NATIVE SPR RCS DRly( 419 9AT*1E SPR 905 DR710 015 5µ111E SPR NGS BR7vE °43 R 07+40 SPR NCS OR11E 007 14171E SRR NG5 3(710 003 4A/IVs SPAUNDS 09571E ICTAL LO, AREA 59 64A R7040 -01 -TAY AREA 3.738 006419 AREA/ OPEN SPACE 2.405 TONAL ARE4 65.947 E%751190 20197114 - 0/R/90 - PROPOSED 20919G - A/10/00 TOTAL D10(1.09NENT AREA . 65,947 ACRES* T01µ IFIAME9 OF LOTS 111000SED TOTAL NURRE9 OF ENFELL ITT° 1P41 T5 090.05(0 - 05 TOTAL NIABER GF 1IC101044L DRELL ING UN7 T5 PROPOSED F71 EACH STRUCTURE 1, 1 SINGLE PAUL* 0RE1.0115 11 ACCESSORY EAELL I NCS TOTAL *PANDER 00 PROP05(0 DFP -STREET PARKING SPACES: 9 PER LOT - 44 TOTAL CROSS DE95711 PROPOSED. NIAEER 0. OPELL1NG 4,81114 AS A ( 51NG 91170 TO THE "0•AL DEVELDRAENT AREA 0.33 04/AC FENCE 9099195e 490 50.1 CAP 5 (Y PCP Pe .010I 'AVIIVIELLO caLemoo Irma 5 O0'33'04" E 68.60' S 89'27'40' W 863.54' 7595134110* (5411. 00 N 6731 2 i)r V SPA. _ 704,604. SF.e 7.405 401 MONT OF 'RAY TO 9E DEDICATED TO GARFIELD DQ1NT' 4 Q7• 4 '$) \ -g 0770112` VI yA 10543' P90PERTY 3OURDA!Y ' MO 2.06' N 89'25'44- 275-94'F 014090 / !/ ROAD 210 , J J J THAT ME 110DER9GIED JN APO 7AMI LU080LP¢ ARE THE 01114ER(5). OFMAT 9E,66. PR0PE0TY 011,ATE0 TN THE C039TY GF 0A4F03°0° STATE OF COLORADO. AND BE9IC A PART OF THE NAME 5NRING5 5 401N9ON AS 54046 ON THE A000NPAN1NP PLAT. SA/0 REAL PROPERTY 8E640 WORE PARTICULARLY DESOBECD 45 F011O05 A TRACT OF LAND 0114A1ED 6 114E 191/2 OF SECTIO. 2 ANC 11( 5x91/15(1/4 OF SECTION 41. TQNN94. 6 SOUTH.. RANGE 93 REST OF THE 9#14 PRNCP'AL V1 05AM, MORE PAR031LA161' 00ST311BTD AS FOLLOW& 9ECROMVO AT 1140 NORM 1/4 COMER Of SATO SECTION 11, 1149100 N19 A 2 1/2` u1I9NAI CAP LSE 19671, THENCE N 9995040" W 663.54 FEET ALONG THE NORM LINE TO NNE N7RMNE5T CpKR OF THE HE1/4 NE1/4 971/4 Cr 540 SECTION 111 THEME 5 00'12'04' E 29664 FEET ALO.[ ME 0051 L1C (0 SAC 141/4 161/4 N*1/4 10 119E NORM 611E EW 114E 1444BER PAR1V1 AS Da.021901 119 90019 367, PACE 456; MINCE N 89'23'40' E 279.94 FEET ALONG ANE NORM 191E i0 11E ',GNINEAS? °09504(95 OF 544, NMK1 PARCEL, MEHCE 5 00128'16' E 192614 :QT ALONG 14( EAST UNE TO THE SW MEAST COWER Of SAID WAWA PARCEL. ALSO RDOG ENE S01+. LRC 40' 146 9E1/4 N*,/4 OF SMD SECTION 11; DEUCE N 9913'06' E 36057 FEET 66.040 ME 5011 LIRE TO 11( 50 114WE5T CORNER OF 'INE NWT/A 04.1/4 of 5A0 SECTION 11; 19[1ME N 803040' E 1313.16 FEET ALONG 114E SOUTH LPC TO ME SOUMEAST CORNER OF 5A0 NW1/• NE1/4: 11404CE 9 000615' * 1319.09 FEET ALO•° ME EAST LRC Cf SAO 1[61/4 NET/4: THENCE N 00954'57 97 106.91 FEET x050 ME EAST LANE OF 1900 501/1 5(1/4 OF 5416 MCT10* 3; 1195(193( s 697036' R 1015.16 FEET TD D.E (A5TE1LY F•041 -Cf -WAY LIME OF 130n41'r ROAD NO 713 07(NCE 5 36'31'35' W 219.93 FEET 4LOI0 5200 RO.R; 1440911. 5 3353'071 N 174.94 FEET ALONG SA3 14,014.: MENU 5 36'0'62. 9 1.01.62 FEET ALONG 5719 R0.0. 10 ME NUT LM OF SAl1 570/4 5(V/4 Of SECTION 2: 1NEHCE 5 0031104' E 69.60 TELT TO 110E P091 Of 5EGR1490, PARCEL CO4T0950 65.467 ACRES 409E 0R 0(55. MAT SAID ONNER 9A5 CALMED 111E 5A. REAL PROPERTY TO BE LAID CUT AND SLRV0YED AS MAINE SMOGS SIMONSON. A 54011155109 0f A 04A1 OF OA177003 004917, 1:04CRA00, 1NAT SANE DOPIER DOES HEREBY DE50ATE AND SET APA1r ALL OF 144 STREETS AMD ROADS AS 9199141 GN 'HE ACGOYPANSWM PLAT 10 THE USE OF D1E PUBLIC FOREVER, A3C HEREON OEIACA1E 1O 110E PUBLIC UTAMSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAO REAL PROPERTY 1914(31 ARE 1.ABELE0 A5 410.117 EASEMENTS ON ME ACCOIPAN9NC PLAT A5 PERPETUAL EASEMENTS FOR 1,1E 785TALLA1ION AND PNCE Of 4TRJ6E5 1RR1GA1O! 490 04419ACE FA0u0E5 940.4053 041 ICE LAM1ED TO 4NE5. GAS LNES 7ELE)4444a,E uNE0 10GEMER 3014 1,2 99041 TO TRIM WTE9FEMNG OWES AHO BR139U 114 PERPETUAL NICHT Of 1604(55 4110 (MESS FOR 951Ml4Tg9 ADC 9*NTENAIIOE OF SVC. LOCI 9336 EASEMCI1S AND 960115 9141 BE 41+4003 6 A REASONABLE AND PRUDENT 71µT poi. E0E45C FOR STREET PAYING OR 701PR0'AE4EN!0 SHALL BE F411A91(0 90 114E SELLER OR PURCHASER. NOT 9Y THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD 6 WI0E55 HEREOF 5A10 004EA HAS C4USED 915 NAM T4 90 *0303NTO 5l1BSCrfBEA 1435 DAY OF 4.0 STATE OF OM.ORADO ) )y COON, OF (90110LD 110E FORE0000 7EOCAT104 w 5 ACBRONLECCED BEFORE NE DNS AD. 91 µ9 CO WS5O1+ (WWI 49191E55 1111 HARD AND SEAL ROTARY 19.491JC 0*" OF 0.32' /41,[ / 11006911222- 0 W 9(389 1110 CAP LS 719599 t PP09ERTY BOUNDARY mm mom al Mai, 101,2 NE.A. eommo moo 141 a 0* 015 M+/4 GORN(R SEG 1 3-1/2' 4.. CAP LS 814671 P D.B. (••7 '00r ' r♦ PL 568.03 �7N 194 '0* 971*. comm. 1,150 1015,18' •271 5 53957'29.37' 1 260 fi r I II II 1 a1 1 1 71 II I� Tv Yr` * I •7/,y,61/ rii 0 ' T Dor. 4/ s „/8 Go 7 / / 4 1 253.%99 . SF.t 5.917 ACS I= / SI I 140 S 744.30' 9 39'34'41 1 6 4 01 y6 7 221.712 SFt 5.089 041 1641 T 360.00' (0016) L 69'3441' E C5 10 2 [E/15550 FENCE LcjIA 520.3611. SF.c 5.174 AC* 91970 r 20. DG Ti L J N 89.74'4x• E 2�3L 21 26 .* 5.172 AG} elf 4/0 r L_ 9 812'34.41` E. 9450100 ER5E/ 4 (r7PICAI) J- 1011 r1 200,720. 5.1,0 4.907 *10± DEOCAIED TO (WELD COUNTY R 1913.1"0-01-E 649,24' I DEBAR AND CAP LS #19599 L 150' 471,190 ANO N65GA11 ti E9NT. N 963441 1 0 22. N 09 - r 8 E9.ST0*G FENCE 2 394 33 2e1 L41_6 Q 3 1.5 9.430 A02 70,00 k R 09'34'4 E 34494' CT 565' N 69 34'41' 30' LOUT, A40 RR4G*r1DN EMT EYNSNIC FENCE 321,454. IF 2 7.379 ACt T 9094.11 `AP REPLAE N.M 3-1/4 • µ11N. CAP LS 61939 ON 3/e 130' AL BAR 356.111 621.12' 360.00' ('''0) LOLA 725 -S 546: AGF 30.90 P. 1 L N 4934'901 E 150' 411U°' 440 .1104,11014 ESM' r 620.06' -1 J N 39•3414+' E 220.520. 00.4 5.177 A0* 914.76- r_ _L 225�2F! 3,173 AGt J N 69.34'19' E 2 619.10' 1 1 LOO i 200,607. 5F t 6,805 ACI: J n 69'37 19 r- 5300' DEBAR 4190 GN LS /19595 45.0 0TIL1TY Are ARCADE.. (SWT. I C319*, 9640 224 436.74 70' 5701 iG 9E OEDC.41E0 TO GART1ELD Mowry 47 MP/ 0 IB V 0> 10 a p OI (4 (7 ail N 89'33'08- E 382..27' S CT/16 COR SED, 1x ' PIF x46 19 RACE' x,C OMAR119 AND LAND CAP #19]96 W 0027'11• E 30.60 7171. a4ePP AMP, ppLIMPIA SOP No7 m1.. PAM A6LE COMAE RAD OS O(LTA LE90114 TANGERT CNEND 8EA1l4G 01019E 01 6900 6606.46` 63.19 54.011 5_13OY311 R 66.60 02 8300 069}99'S • Y 125.47 79.91 5 65.29'25' ( 11100 0.3 80-00'57,8'32 220.38 411.10 9 101615' E 757.05 GA 171431 19.34.15' 314.52 160.22 5 4876134' W !19.06' 07 1°131 496'25' 124.16 37-11 5 54'09'24' N 124.14 06 165131 1376'40' 374.65 196.13 5 41836.151 I 37336 P. MI{ .. b +i M11w18soe SOW, AM APIPA EMSRI FENCE N 89'34'41' E HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, I INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 923 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81801 (970) 945- 8676 1315.16' GPIPPIPA P. MP... PLM 11E1,F16 309 SEC 41 46 664 N PLACE 9..0 ALM. GDP LS 648566 669534'46' 11000' SECTIONS B 4 11. 15.9301P 6 5. KANDE 9] 4, 6104 VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1• - 7000 GRAPHIC SCALE ( 14* FEET ) 1 Inch - 100 IL 009' TR Y S5 ffE E,1V040 71 FRAM! N .ARR!NG'ON, 30 ^(9(51 STATE THD- AM A 9EGS1ERE0 LANG SuRV[0DR LaN9C.3 UNDER 191E *.6*5 (0 111E 5141E DF COLORADO. THAT 1445 PLAT 15 4 TRUE. CORRECT MIO COMPLETE PLAT Of THE 100OVE SPRNK:S A73ON1O8 AS 1249 DVC PLATTED, DEDICATED AMG MORN 'ER(ON, MAT 9104 PLAT WAS 4AOE ;RCM AN AC04RATE S464EY AF 54/0 PRCPEBTY 97 NE AND LACER 11 541ERN570* 460 CORREE1'L1 9-Osr' ME L0CA91Lw ANO 14I119O95 OF ME LOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS OF SAD 5491}0(1919 AS TIME SAME ARE STANED 4009 THE °9513110.0 71* COMPLIANCE MM 0007,20,9B1 14(041*1085 300(091190 114E 5719011900 OF 4,1445. 13'11355 WHEREOF I HAVE SET MY HANG AND 5E44. DNS _ DAY OF FRA41! R_ HAR911400 S, :5 •19599 A0 24 (040170 SUR,1213C5 00011 CAIS APPROVED FOR 30951[04? AND SOMA ONLY ANO 801 THE 4CC4RAC1 OF 549VE15, CALCL1AT10+5 AND DRAFTING PLASuARf TO CR.5., 33-51-101 4950 107 (R9"A5(D4. 042011(LD CO1NTY SLFR (TDR DATE 410049Y5 00918010410 AM *15041ER LICENSED TO PRACTI E LA* IN ME STATE a (0.0.9000, DO 4095(891 CERTIFY MAT ALL DEDICATIONS TO THE 01.16.1C. .15 DESCRIBED CN MK FINAL PLAT ARE FREE AND CLEAR OF ANY LIENS. CAMS OR (5C411BRANCES Cr MOORE/ AND F1R6f11 TWAT THIS 51I1204154D4 4S 14 SUBSTANTIAL _� !NCE RN ME GAMED Cowry SGB0N0ON REOWA15O10 OF 1084. Ar100NEr 041E 90ARO O7 (O11NTT C0N65401FR9 10910CATF 10415 PLAT. APPROVED 41 ME BOARD OF COUNTY COIN590RER5 OF GARFIELD COM4Tv, COLORADO' TUTS DAY a AO FOR BUNG VAN THE CLLR! ABC RECGRDER 9F GARF9,0 O191NTY ATC FOR CGRRE0PO4CE 10 ME 004971 DF ME FNB*[ 0E0C*TINS 94080* HEREON: 9U6.ECT TO 114E 9510199419 MAT APPROVAL 114 N0 *AY OBLIGATES GARFIELD MINTY FOR 111E 079140190 0R CON51RLIGN G OF 40ROVEMEVTS ON LANDS. DUBUC PROIDA5 OR EA574AEN15 OED0A0 9* TO THE R0BL1C E5TFP1 15 5PE1MALLSS AOP{(0 7O 91 ME PARD 51' COUNTY CONIRSSONERS AND FLAMER THAT SAID APPROVAL 9(µL 4I 110 *AY 094GATE GARFIELD COMM FOR IN( (0N5TR40TMN. 9EPA4T OR 9AR7E54NCE OF Pu040 1901*455, BOARD OF COUNTY COH1R590*EH5 OF GARFIELD COWAN. 03LCRA00 BT CHAIRMAN WITNESS 4P HANG 400 ME SEAL OF 141E (1!11400 Cr GARFIELD ATTEST: COUNTY 0,340 I 90 •nLFM OTAERA6 0410 1'4' 0_4y(1 901797708,91 04111910011' 145 PLAT WAS TAE0 100 RECORD Ar 144E 05405E OF 'RDE CLERK AAO RECORDER Of GARFIELD C 41010 AT CACLOC9 -N. 04 THE DAY OF AD, 20.__ man 15 DAY RECORDED 114 9006 PADS RESP TION NO. AnE51• CUSP ARO 9ECCR0(0 601 8 IMAIMItoWoiliitoi. TM' 01111Ir4 RIM \\\ NO S310N NOLOrMLISNOO 335 _g 31V3S 31HdV2i� JIA1 AND PAUL LUCIINOUHL GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO NATVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION DRAM°, DRAINAGE AND EFFOSKNJ OONTROL PLAN COUNTRY ENGINEEFINO, INC. 92:1 COOPEF AVENUt- CL.EN4YOOE1 cocoas. CO 81601 11H(970) 945-6675 FK[970i 40.5-255$ 0E5 EPT OR. EPT CK. DATE 9-7-00 EJLE CR -01 W000 111115 T Ali0 11111115: MI 1 MI MN NENE INN NMI 1 gEIOE , OE az ow UN= \r„ • x ae• • .. . - M1 a \,. „N. 6111 !i!! 6 Y \ .00 00 ,1:1011 10r11 00•5 .00000 - 0 r CC M8 0 0 - 61 CJ 5370.6 •C L.' ,L1, ...,' Sif -- U25'7026i--‘- 5371 2 ,- a. — '111 ril r" pig ii 037130 53719 2.00 i 0 30E3 17 ., 5372 5 0 0 1 2'a —337116 i 11 1 1 472,3 5313.1 53013 5312-65 5373'3 ..,-.. .. . .00 5373J1 53 73 5 —33711-6—. 5373.8 q iNa-- `"JT iR 5Q 7 4.4 -•*----------' [KC _58320 . • 531070 (If& 0.75 1 53751 i War 6170.90 ---.'i —OW I 53 76 1 RI Aria —MUT- 11 (KS. 7.75 1 0C,E 507503 -475764. 2 5377P 1 —531W-60 53 7 7 6 1 a —6311- S3/9 0 —5376-10 53788 —3319C63— 53795 — -- -... 5370.00 1)9504_ Z33 EA80 ic a iT @ — ---....... ---..... 1 r 10 4.--- -- 11 sg 0*05 2.00 0 30E3 17 0 0 2'a i 1 53013 --5372-51 E0C5 .00 [KC _58320 3717 111 RI Aria sn 3 1VZS 31HdYED 28c2 2 6 .A0 ANC PAUL LUGINBUHL GARFIELD ULM TY. COLORADO NATIVE SPRINGS SUMMON ROAD PLAN MD PROFILES NCH COWRY ENIWERNQ 0C. S123 CCOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD FININGS CO 61601 PROM 045-11676. FX -19701 94$-2555 OESLPT 9(1 EPI CK. OA IE OA TE 9 - 7 - 00 FILE: PP -01 a I EASI10 DAL'. 1KlH SWTOFF YAL.WS OoSP( Ow -Am. PTO. i- R5 RON WHAT 1 I I PRpPR,SEO 10-IC22(1 FI H CY0RIGA.TR9N PPE - L01 7 r 107 5 // // T r / L01 I / P r UTUTY SERWCES LOTS 6 ! R L INSTALL A SLFNtt C:MKCTIp1 11/ GATE AO( MON PROPOSED (MAIM OK ID AyRTU) TANKS FOR FRE HATER SUPPLY PROPOSED FIRE HATER TANRS. 3 - 10.000 GALLON 910110 MCH DRAF{ HYDRANT APPRO+EO RY POE DEPT. r RS LOT 4 — Ys- LOT S L / k / k 1 1. I L LOT 0 r 7 RS I 1 1 � I 1 LO0 10 I I UTU 1Y WINCES LOTS 10 RH L r L LOT 11 -- ERS l---AIWA:MN (051100 PPE ACROSS PROP0;E0 ROAD I 4j/ I 1 LOT S 1 I I tti LOT 2 LOT 1 TIE 1110 0001040 OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 090 VAXAGROUNO TID-FPRONE • I II t 116 23231T1 ROAD 70r GRAPHIC SCALE ( 01 FEET 1005. 900 11,- I. L 1. POTABLE WATER TO BE PROVIDED, BY INDIVIDUAL WELL. 2. SEWER TO BE 1505. • SEE CCrrSTRUCT100 NOTES ON SHEET 5 LEGEND PROPOSED OAP R SEAL PROPOSED pTAYEL S.:FADER (051100 ROAD 0051100 PTC. CENTEJJNE -�x 0 E05TIN0 O'1ERHEAO ELECTRIC E05TPW ONDERCROUNO TELEPHONE Ex.51N.0 FENCE -MPA ----o0 - PROPOSED EIEC/TELE/GOAL/CAS �,. H PROPOSED PRICA1ON 14.4E PROPOSED 81010000 ENVELOPE PROPOSED LOT 4000 E0511N4 PROPERTY SOvROAR' 2 €050000 0(100.04( PEDESTAL •O. E05Tw0 PO1KR P1l0 IRS P2OPOS(0 OHM". 00 SERmCE WA COYER FINi91 0000E 1111 COVER SAME AS YMN 100.0x7-04004 0200 PORC41101 PPC TEE vm REND MPROp11A1ELY 1/A Cr OP -1n' SOKE04D ROO9 FOR ORARIAOE I -i Ha. 0200 APCA TCP 5(RM0E PPE IRRIGATION SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL N.T,S, PR0.2Cr No 2000056.01 KPl WO WD J..J X. AMU Mil NM Miin MI w I■■■ iNi■■� i P v .. y + M M vy y-. g q ia aa2 'XAfl "4 4002 r ilk$ gat 6?Li E Xi m i it wig 4 id g 6§ � � �L Rm i 4 Al R+P rEgA tArY fgig z C7 S E!) (f) m - 1 0 O z 3 • rz ! glao pig? Aat V LI! ;• i 7 F A M s" p 7 ggg R - 0 - oda z-1 xi C — U7 R rl El in oi IIP OA C) - c 14 d 22 tfl �pA nQN T 0 ,M).1 AHO PAUL LUDN8Ur11 GARTLELO COUNTY. COI.UHAUO NATIVE SPF NaS SUBDIVISION MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 1101 COUNTRY ENOMEERNQ INC Gia COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD OPRICEI, CO 81001 PI -11970) 945-71676 FX(970) 415-2556 HCK S ORC . EPT . TE 9-7-00 E. Of1 DATE RF VISION FROM : Liston House FAX NO. : 9709454066 Sep. 05 2001 09:21AM P2 FROM : N=THE .<1ES P-UIJE N1-. Fcrrn Nv, G WS -25 APPLICANT Sp. 05 2021 43.: 4,7R1 P1 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER RECEIVED COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennlat adg ,11As Shermein Qt., Utiw r, Co+orsdo 3t)3 (363) 866-3561 PAUL B & JIM E 'LUGINBUHL POBOX 950 BASALT, CO 81621 - SEP 0 6 2001 RE-c4. f1 r ,. WELL. PERMIT NUMBER 235'794 p 2 5 � DIV. 5 W[ 39 DES. BASIN MC ��a AEEROVED WFLL1.0OAIIOAC GARFIELD COUNTY NW 114 NE 114 Sac;ion 11 Township 0 S Raffle 93 W Sixth P.M. ULU13C F:. from Borth Section Line 218S Ft. from East Section Line (970) 827-45136 Und COO1 D NATE3 PERMfT TO QONLTRUCT A WE L Northing:E ting: iSSUANC -OF TiiiS"PERMIT DOES NOT CCNFEFtAWATER -RIGHT g_Qjy iTIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This *ell shall be used in suzi-i a way se to cause no material injury to existing water -fights_ The issuance of ■his permit doss not aur hey applicant that no injury will scour to another veeted water right nr preclude another owner of a vested water right from saeklrv; reilef In a dun court action. The construction of this well shall be In compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2. unless approval ❑f a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump inetaitation Contractors in accordance with Rule 19. Approved pursuant to CRS 37.92-B02(S)(h)(I) for this use as described In CRS 37.92.502(1)(d). The use of groundwater from this welt is limited to tire protection. 'this well shall be capped and locket and ha available for use only in fighting Fres. The rrexintum Dumping rata of this wail shalt not exceed 15 GPM. The average annual amount of ermund water to be appropriated shall not excte6 1 zere-foot. The Division Engineer shall be noriftad within 72 hnure whwrupunr this wet! is pumped. This welt shall be constructed not more then 200 feat from the lceation specified on this permit 84 r 2) 4) 5) e) 7) 6) APPROVE! JSG Stets En;inane ,FLdCe?iQ! NO. 0480917 DATE ISSUED COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SI+ RMAN ST., R.M. 818, DENVER CO 80203 phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303)866-3581 GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application (Please note: other forms are available For specific uses including - residential, livestock, monitoringiobserv., gravel pits, registration of old wells) Re'viww instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black ink or typed 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION 6. USE OF WELL (please attach detailed description) Name of applicant Paul B. Luginbuhl and Jim E. Luginbuhl Mailing Address R O. Box 950 ❑ INDUSTRIAL I OTHER: Fire Protection O COMMERCIAL O MUNICIPAL ❑ IRRIGATION ❑ FEED LOT -- number of head: 7. WELL DATA City Basalt State Zip Code CO 81621 maximum pumping rate 15 gpm Annual amount 1.0AF Telephone number )include area Code) (970) 927-4585 `otal depth 100 ft. Aquifer Colorado R. AlluviumfWasatch 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION tcheck appiicabie box(es)) ® Construct new well ❑ Replace existing well Change (source) Aquifer ▪ Other: 3. REFER TO (if applicable): O Use existing well Q Change or Increase Use O Reapplication (expired permit) Water court case # West Divide Contract 4 355 Permit # A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,r -'ay be provided as aro aracnnrent): See attached. iif used for crop irrigation, attachscaled map that shows irrigated area.) B. 4 acres 65.96 C. owner Paul B. & Jim E. Luginbuhl Emergency Verbal # -VE- Monitoring hole acknowledgment Weil name or # Monitoring hole acknowledgment Fire Well D. List any other welts or water rights used on this land: Each lot will have only one well. The fire well is to be centrally located in the cul de sac 9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER (optional) 4. LOCATION OF WELL Name Shelton Drilling Corporation Licanse number 1095 County Garfield Quarter/quarter NW 1f4 Quarter NE1/4 10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent Section 11 Township N or S 6 ❑ El Range E or W 93 ❑ 0 Principal Meridian 6th Distance of well from section lines 130 ft from ®N❑s 2165 ft from i] E 0 w The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis- demeanor pursuant to O.R.S. 24-4-104(13)(a). 1 have read the statements herein, know the contents thereof, and state that they are true to my knowledge. wen location address. if different from applicant address (it applicable( County Road 221 For replacement wells only - distance and direction from old well to new well feet direction 5. TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (may be provided as an attachment): See attached. Must be original signature l Title Date eifT, t2OEJ OPTIOAL INFORMATION USGS map name PWR map no. Surtace elev. B. STATE PARCEL IU# (optional): C. # acres in tract 65.96 O. Owner Paul B. Luginbuhl and Jim E. Luginbuhl E. Will this be the only well on this tract? YES NO (if other wells are on this tract. see instructions) Office Use Only USE(S) DN CO WD BA MD Form GWS -45 (12/95) SENT BY: RPPD; 9786252983; APR -8-82 11:40AM; PAGE 111 RIFLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT April 3, 2002 Kit Lyons Garfield County Building and Planning 109 8 Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Reference: Native Springs Subdivision Kit, RECEIVED APR 0 9, 2002 The Rifle Fire Protection District has reviewed the proposed Native Springs Subdivision and approves the concept of a 30,000 gallon central water supply and individual automatic fire sprinkler systems in the future residences. Sincerely, Mike Morgan District Chief Telephone (970) 625-1243 • Fax (970) 625-2963 1850 flailroad Avenue • P Cl, Box 1133 • Rifle, Co',orado 81650 Garfield County Planning Department Memo To: Planning Commission From: Kit Lyon, Senior Planner CC: Ron Liston, Land Design Partnership, Mr. Bob Regulski Date: 08110101 Re: Additional Condition of Approval for Native Springs Today I received a phone call from an adjacent property owner, Mr, Bob Regulski, who owns commercial property to the south of the Native Springs Subdivision. He generally supports the subdivision request but does have a concern that future residential lot owners may have a conflict with the adjacent commercial zoning. Staff suggests an additional condition of approval be added as follows: The covenants shall be amended to dearly state that property adjacent to the subdivision is zoned commercially. The adjacent commercial zoning shall be disclosed to potential lot purchasers at the time of closing, who should be fully prepared to accept any impacts the commercial zoning may present. • Page 1 GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: Craig Lis FROM: Kit Lyon COMPANY. State Engineer's office DATE: 07/30/01 FAX NUMBER: 303-866-3589 TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 5 4`1 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: 303-866-3581 RE: Native Springs Subdivision YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER. 0 URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT X PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE Craig, Here is the information you requested. Ron Liston, the Planner, speaks of storing water for fire protection, as well as the use of irrigation water. Joe Hope, an Engineer, also proposes filling underground tanks for fire protection purposes, as well as purchasing bulk water for this purpose. [CLICK HERE AND TYPE RETURN ADDRF.SSI i 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 11 WATER REPORT NATIVE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION The Native Springs Subdivision will be served by individual water wells. The individual water demand of the subdivision will be typical of a single-family residential community. Each single- family lot can be expected to demand approximately 420 gallons/day based on a 3.5 persons/residence occupancy rate. With the addition of an accessory dwelling the demand will increase approximately 300 gallons, day based on 2.5 persons/AM.:. The total demand for a lot with an ADL; would be approximately 720 gallons' day. Individual lot owners will be responsible for well drilling. water treatment and maintenance. Please reference the enclosed Native Springs Subdivision Water Supply letter prepared by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. The option of a central water system was considered as an alternative, and determined to be too expensive to install and maintain. We are proposing in the protective covenants that each individual lot be required to install a fire protection sprinkler system. The sprinkler systems should provide suppression of a tire before emergency vehicles would arrive on the scene. Also. three 10,000 -gallon tire protection water storage tanks are to be located within the center of the proposed cul-de-sac. The tanks would be tilled by the irrigation line during irrigation season. and by water hauled by truck during. non - irrigation season or if the irrigation line is not useable. The 30,000 -gallon tire storage water could be utilized to help tight a structure or open space tire. Irrigation water shall be delivered via a buried pipe to all individual lots. The existing irrigation ditch that is located on the northwest corner of the property shall supply the proposed irrigation system. LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP 918 Cooper Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-2246 1 Fax 970-945-4066 May 1, 2001 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Dept. 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Native Springs Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application — Original submission - September 2000 Updated Resubmission — May 1, 2001 Dear Mark: Attached herewith is the Preliminary Plan and Supplemental Information as required for preliminary plan review and a check for the application fee of $675 for the above referenced property. Also attached is a check to for the Colorado Geologic Survey review in the amount of $595.The proposed subdivision property is a 65.9 acre tract located on County Roads 221 and 210 less than two miles east of the City Rifle. On behalf of the owners Jim and Paul Luginbuhl, I request that this application be reviewed for completeness in accordance with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Th e following is offered as a supplemental introduction to the preliminary plan application. LAND USE SUMMARY: Existing Zoning: Agriculture / Residential / Rural Density Total Development Area: 65.95 acres Total Number of Lots: 11 Total Number of Dwelling Units: Primary Units 11 Accessory Units 11 Total 22 Total Area of Non-residential Floor Space: 0 Total Number of Dwellings per Structure: one Total Number of Off-street Parking Spaces: As required for single family residences and accessory units. Gross Density: 3.0 acres per dwelling unit including all possible accessory dwelling units (0.33 dwellings per acre) 6.0 acres per dwelling with no accessory dwellings (0.17 dwellings per acres) 1 1 1 1 ACCESS The project is accessed from County Road 221 by a, 1,250 foot long cut -de -sac which is in excess of the county design standard of 600 feet. The cul-de-sac has been oversized with a road radius of 60 feet and an 80' radius ROW to accommodate easy movement of emergency vehicles. An alternative configuration would be a through a road connecting CR 221 and 210. This would require a significant earthen fill to achieve an acceptable gradient and alignment leading to CR 210 and result in an objectionable visual impact on the site. A through connection would also result in a "shortcut" between CR 210 and 221 resulting in unnecessary traffic flow through the subdivision. The Garfield County Road & Bridge Department commented during the Sketch Plan that they preferred there not be any access from County Road 210. Each residence is proposed to be equipped with fire sprinkler systems and 30,000 gallons of fire protection water will be provided in buried tanks in the cul-de-sac. The vegetational character of the property now and after build -out is such that there is minimal risk of a wildfire at the site. The Rifle Fire District has indicated to the development team that the on site water storage and over -sized cul-de-sac satisfies their needs for fire protection services and the requirement of residential fire sprinklers offer an extremely effective additional level of fire protection. The fire sprinkler systems will qualify the residences for much lower priced fire insurance. Because of the minimal risk of a wildfire at this site, the low density of the project, the provision of an oversized cul-de-sac combined with the fire protection water storage and residential sprinkler systems, the Fire District did not recommend an emergency access from the cul-de- sac. In consideration of these conditions, the Applicant requests a variance from the allowed Maximum Length of Cul-de-sac. WATER Each lot will be served by a well located on the lot. Attached herewith is a detailed report on the legal and physical water supply. The P&Z requested that a central water system be investigated for the project. Several factors were considered in the analysis of a community water system versa individual wells: 1. Initial cost of construction the individual and community systems. The cost of the community water system with a water storage tank is approximately 9-10 times more expensive than the combined cost of drilling and equipping all of the individual wells in the project. 2. Adequacy of fire protection. The proposed 30,000 gallons of fire protection water meets the needs of the Fire District for low density rural subdivisions. The requirement for in house fire sprinkler systems offers a level of protection that equals that of a community water system with a Targe fire protection water storage capacity because the sprinkler systems are so effective at containing residential fires. The sprinkler systems are immediately effective at suppressing a fire where as a central water system has no impact on fire suppression until the fire department arrives at the scene of the fire. By the time the fire department arrives at a rural site, the fire has already caused considerable damage. In-house sprinklers appear to offer better protection than a central water system. Even with the added cost of the in-house fire sprinklers, the on lot wells are far less expensive than the central water system. 3. Implications for water quality. The water quality of wells at the site are adequate for residential use but is of such a quality that many residents may wish to install reverse osmosis systems to enhance the quality of water for personal consumption purposes. A central water system does nothing to enhance the water quality. Installation of reverse osmosis treatment on a central system is much more complex and expensive than are individual residential applications. The relative small amount of discarded water from the individual systems can be discharged in to the on lot sewage treatment systems and returned to the ground water. The large volumes of discard water from a community treatment facility, creates a significant challenge in providing for its disposal. 4. Moni of the physical supply and quality over the long term. The home owners association can effectively monitor the water levels and water quality in the individual wells or in a central well. Provisions for such monitoring of the individual wells is included in the protective covenants. Given the dramatic difference in the cost of a central water system compared to a well on each lot and the superior fire protection that can be provided by the proposed in- house sprinklers, a central water system was not proposed for the development. SEWER The Cottonwood Springs Mobile Home Park was contacted in regard to the potential contracting with them for the treatment of sewage from the Native Springs development. Attached is a letter from the legal counsel for Cotttonwood Springs stating capacity is not available for the Native Springs development. Native Spring is too small of a development to absorb the cost of constructing the 3,000 foot plus length of sewer line needed to connect to Cottonwood Springs, plus there would be significant additional fees related to the expansion of their treatment plant. These are costs much beyond the financial scope of 11 residential lots. Just the sewer collection lines within the boundaries of the development would be nearly equal to the per lot cost of individual, on lot sewage disposal systems_ All lots are five acres or larger. This provides more than adequate room for 1SDS facilities and the appropriate separation from the on lot wells. An ISDS management program is included in the attached engineer's report and said management program will be included in the protective covenants. All ISDS facilities are required by plat note to be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. RIGATION WATER The attached plans show the distribution of irrigation water by underground pipes to 3 i•. 0except • bythe moderate grade each lot. The irrigation water will not be pressurized change across the property. Each lot will need to add their own pumping system if they choose to apply irrigation water through a sprinkler system or large spray guns. li RELATIONSHIP TO THE GARFiELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following text summarizes how the proposed development is in general conformity il with the Goals identified in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan adopted in October of 1984, which was in effect at the time of submission of the Preliminary Plan. 1 AGRICULTURE Goal: Ensure that farm and ranch activities are not forced out of production by non-agricultural uses. 111 The area, at the rear of each lot, restricted from building development serves to ill buffer the surrounding agricultural uses from the residential activities of the new development. Flow-through irrigation ditches will be preserved and areas not committed to building development will continue to be irrigated with the property's water I rights. Even with an accessory dwelling on each lot, the gross project density is lower than that allowed by the existing zone district. II HOUSING Goal: Provide for affordable and diverse housing types capable of accommodating the needs of county residents, in all income ranges, without putting a 111 financial burden on existing public services. The Native Springs Subdivision is directed at families desiring a small rural acreage II that can accommodate a limited amount of livestock while offering easy access to the primary valley transportation system and local commercial services. Such a product can be offered at this location at a price significantly lower than is possible in Garfield 111 County upriver from Glenwood Springs. INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL 1 Goal: Maintain and support the existing economic base of the county and encourage further diversification, which will broaden employment opportunities and help III stabilize the economic future of the region. uses are proposed bythe project. Residents of the project will provide No commercialp p 1 additional consumers for the City of Rifle commercial community. RECREATION / OPEN SPACE IIIGoal: Ensure county residents and visitors have ample recreational opportunities through the development of and maintenance of parks, recreation facilities 4 Message. Read Folder: box • • Page 1 of 1 Message 2 of 12 (NEW) Delete Forward I Reply 1 Reply All Move To: 1 Received Date: Sun, 29 Jul 01 13:50PM MDT From: Daryl Meisner <djrniz@rifle.net> To: kitlyon@usa.net Subject: Native Springs Subdivision Add To Address Book More Details Print Preview After careful review of the Native Springs Subdivision I have the following comments: 1. The applications seems to be well done and complete 2. The tests of the well #2 appear to be within acceptable ranges. 3. I would hope that all wells will be tested when comlete. Eventhough this well tested ok, I'm not sure it is safe to assume that they all will. 4. I noted that there was little mention of trash/solid waste storage and removal. The covenants address it briefly but it seems weak. Shouldn't there be some stronger language to address trash? 5. It is noted that there is likely to be conflicts with wildlife in this area. In any area of urban -rural interface wildlife conflict is inevidable. I hope that building will occure to minimize the conflits. Addressing trash for example will reduce the skunk population and conflict. Respectfully submitted: Mary L. Meisner, Garfield County Public Health Nursing Director Delete Forward 1 Reply Reply All Move To: Received -i 1998-2001 USA.NET°, Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Patent # 5,937,161. Users of this site agree to be bound by Net@ddress Messaging Center http-//k2.netaddress.com/tpl/Message/214L1YOFMF/Read 07/30/2001 • 1 MEMORANDUM To: Kit Lyon From: Steve Anthony Re: Comments on the Native Springs Subdivision Date: July 19, 2001 Kit, Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the Native Springs Subdivision. My comments are as follows; 1, After reviewing the weed inventory, I will be contacting the applicant regarding the infestation of sulfur cinquefoil so I can confirm the location of this plant as it is not known to be in the County. 2. The submitted weed management plan is acceptable. The County expects the applicant to follow the weed plan in a timely manner. In particular we emphasize the need to manage Russian Olive as a noxious weed. The inventory has listed ten Russian Olive trees on the property, we would like to emphasize the importance of managing weeds such as Russian Olive when they are in relatively small quantities on the property. 3. The applicant has submitted a written Revegetation Plan. While the Plan has specific details on revegetation, it does not assign responsibility for the reclamation work to be done on new road cuts, utility line placements (water line and common trench), culverts, and various valves and hydrants. In particular, revegetation for utility line disturbances seem to a "gray area", and the applicant should state which party (either the Homeowner's Association or another party) is responsible for the revegetation work. Message. Read Folder: • • Page 1 of 1 Message 1 of 8 (NEW) > l Delete I Forward I Reply Reply All 1 Move To: IIReceivedjJ Date: Tue, 24 Jul 01 15:24PM MDT From: "sieve anthony"<santhony@coop.ext.colostate.edu> Add To Address Book To: Kit Lyon <kitlyon@usa.net> Subject: Native Springs More Details I Print Preview Kit, here's the comments on Native Springs....I did not ask for a reveg bond for a couple of reasons, 1. the project was in the pipeline piror to May 7 deadline (when the BOCC adopted the new reveg guidelines) 2. At the Sketch Plan I had about 6 concerns.... they addressed those, sol was reluctant to add anything that was beyond the scope of those concerns. sorry for the slow response time Steve Anthony Garfield County Vegetation Management Director PO Box 1112 Rifle CO 81650 Phone 970-625-3969 cellular phone 970-379-4456 fax 970-625-3917 e-mail: The following section of this message contains a file attachment prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME -compliant system, you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer. If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance. File information - ---- ---- File: MEMO Native Springs.doc Date: 24 Jul 2001, 15:33 Size: 22016 bytes. Type: Unknown (22K) Delete I Forward I Reply Reply All I Move To: [Received -1 1998-21301 USA.NET6', Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Patent # 5,937,181. Users of this site agree to be bound by Net ddress Messaging Center http://k2. netaddress. com/tpl/Message/31411GCSLCfRead 07/24/2001 .1, RECEIVED JUL'2 2081 • STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1 313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 802°3 Phone; 1303) 866-3581 FAX: (3031866-3589 http://water.state.co.usidefault.htrn July 6, 2001 Kit Lyon, Senior Planner Garfield County Building and Planning 109 8th St Ste 303 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Re: Native Springs Subdivision Preliminary Plan Sections 2 & 11, T6S, R93W, 6th RM. W. Division 5, W. District 39 BILI C)wens Governor Greg E. Walcher Executive Director i-ial D. Simpson, P.E. State Engineer Dear Ms. Lyon: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a parcel of approximately 66 acres into eleven residential lots. Each lot will be allowed one single-family dwelling and one accessory dwelling. Water for the dwellings and 500 square feet of lawn and garden per lot is to be provided by individual on lot wells constructed under permit nos. 54918-F through 54928- F. These permits were issued on November 16, 2000.pursuant to a contract with the Basalt Water Conservancy District (the District). Well water use is estimated by Zancanella and Associates, Inc., as 8.94 acre-feet of diversions and 1.52 acre-feet of consumptive use. Additional irrigation use to occur via unspecified ditch water rights was not estimated. Sewage will be through individual septic systems. Each of the permits is limited to use in two single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than 500 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals, which is adequate for the proposed uses. However, we have not received a Well Construction and Test Report, a Pump Installation and Test Report or a Statement of Beneficial Use for these wells. If these documents are not receive prior to November 16, 2002, the well permits will expire and be of no effect. The report by Zancanella and Associates, Inc., indicates that Native Springs Well #2 (permit no. 54919-F) was completed on November 1, 200 by Shelton Drilling Corporation. A pump test conducted November 2 and 3, 2000 by the Samuelson Pump Company indicates that the well produced at least 15 gallons per minute over a twenty-five hour period, and that the well recovered to within 0.10 feet of the static water level within eleven hours after pumping ceased. With adequate storage capacity this well should provide an adequate supply for the proposed use. The additional wells should also provide an adequate water supply if they have similar production rates. Our records also indicate the well with Permit No. 208670 was issued for and constructed on the existing parcel. Note that Section 37-92-602(3)(b)(III), C.R.S., requires that the cumulative effect of all wells in subdivision be considered when evaluating material injury to decreed water rights. Therefore, the existing exempt well must be included in either the District's substitute supply plan or an augmentation plan, or must be plugged and abandoned, since the provisions of C.R.S. 37-92-602 which allowed for issuance of this well permit will no longer apply. • • Garfield County Building and Planning July 6, 2001 Native Springs Subdivision Preliminary Plan Based on the above, it is our opinion, pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(1), that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights, and is adequate, so long as valid well permits are maintained for all of the wells, no expanded use of the unspecified irrigation water rights occurs, and the disposition of Permit No. 208670 is resolved as stated in the preceding paragraph. If you or the applicant has any questions concerning this matter, please contact Craig Lis of this office for assistance. Sincerely, Kenneth W. Knox Assistant State Engineer KWKJCMLJNative Springs.doc cc: Alan Martellaro, Acting Division Engineer James R. Lemon, Water Commissioner, District 39