Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitNo. 7041 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 D Job Address 3Z L (14: 40/1(ATO�5 et) 1 Nature of Work Building Pe- Use of Building f �� (/v U S+ ha"q) —f Orr Contractor c (., p / 2) Amount of Permits `-t` . O Date q -lc -t ON\clmdt:) 12-4 ' ©cf pntheZ.15 riti\Fek, 1011)- 24" '.2-°iDD() Wtt Owner Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TELEPH rIE: (970) 945-8212 Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO PERMIT NO. nV i 1 INSPECTION LINE: (970) 945-9159 PARCEIJSCHEDULE NO. 10B ADDRESS: /03 2 cQHnr-Yr Ao///Y, G/�nbJov� S��. GU 1 LOT NO. B�LLOCKNO., rG e / 7 SUBDIVISIOx/ExE2�IPITOx�ts Jot-f-fi...-fker Sl.isa:v rir, 2 own. %m GU+es �`ia ADD E'ap0. 0�x �y6 / 6/.e....,,,0419.S Sys- 7>�'H 9 s- 7�8& C C / %y[e s AD°'�' G !? L4 -ti d J �c ' O y1 n[: • LC NO: 4 AMITE .T/INCINEER. ADDRINs PR UC NO: 5 Ig PT. of ammo /8 / (� `-) /3 r --G ret 1 ` 1Q. Fr. OF LOT 44:2-1/, /O 04-) ( [--� ` •7 J HEIGHT // ry♦ ! C!� Iii. 1/0. OE FLOOR / 6 USE OF BUILDING leC 5/Ch Al e. e_ "V/ ?t-, 7 MOUSE WORM 2E3 X 64. 616. - 0001EjI/a4s/42..r iJo/yt e_._ dh 'rp Llszda-i%0Al CLAIM OF WOLL /maw OADDRION °ALTERATION MOVE ea6lDVE 8 9 GARAGE. MAME °DOUBLE CARPOir, oeW[RE ODOOaLE 10 OD1JVR1PAYFoam FX/.%;4/i1 ` amtI@WADE DEIRORA4cagI PLAN .10,"'1644e.14.0 ,�1y VALUATION OF NOM: $ ADJOS1ED VALDATION.i /J , y / O s- , 6 a !7 L( SPECIAL CONDmONS: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILLBE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER HEREIN OR NOT. THE (RANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE CONSTRUCTION. - /:tee/ s to..2/-/9 BY THE STATE OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OR DAYS AT ANY TIME APPLICATION AND OF LAWS SPECIFIED PRESUME TO GIVE'71 OTHER STATE OR PERFORMANCE OF Y . notioe'abwe. / I% PLAN CHECK FEE: I/ /7/4 . a 9 PERMIT FEE: -,2 2. 6, 71_4" TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED: . Q' l,% �j /,251.g' 77 Y v 1 OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE: (, ' IV ZONING: SETBACKS: Sigaarme of Owner, Con or authorized agent , eDd • , .. ., r i �1 % MANU. HOME: VN`f_] (J 00 ''''����yyy����y�� ISDS NO. FEE: /� '^� r . R - � ApprovaVDare rR , . , !�R' �1I AGREEMENT 3092 - PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WTIH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT ITTEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS IURISDICIION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER. AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Osrfonnoo3 . /t I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL) The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2. A permanent address assigned by the Garfield County Building Department posted where it is readily visible from an access road. 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing. 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot & cold running water, all floors and walls finished and a privacy door. 5. All steps inside or outside over three (3) steps must have handrails. All balconies or decks over 30" high mush have guardrails constructed to meet all 1994 UBC requirements. 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building. 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e., weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ""CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # Signature r c:/cbw/final.wpd -b j ? ?? Date 1 •' a '0('0@ S:b o = lit 4ag' d tr.„,„,‘, -A f 441.2 7S) .IRtAie,wu--21L y._(.,D 7..__. -!i(ent4;44,) 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lines, r buildings, setback easements and utility easements? 46:0 2. Does the site plan include the location of the LS.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water cou es? Yes 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? CY-erS 4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? es 5. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? No 6. W11 this be the only residential structure on the parcel? No If no -Explain: 7. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? 8. For the placement of a manufactured home, have the following been specified? The size of the unit (min. 20ft. x 20ft. ); live roof load (min. 40#); wind design (min. wind speed of 80 mph & 15 lb. wind load); foundation design; method of anchoring? Yes 9. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code re • uirements? No 10. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? No CYes 11. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior, to the application of these changes? Yes No 2 I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. signature date .v ig17 Phon 970)9115-- 7.788 (days) �?7o) 5'YS- 7635-y (evenings) Project Name: 7 42..7,17.---c-� e GC s/Ac /ee/41.4s/C•2 Project Address: l S 3 Cass -,lei/ .E'c.:aor /ft', 6/e`rsvcr , C U Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected Work ntay not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. November 9, 1998 Mr. Thomas J. Westhoff P.O. Box 2464 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 Job No. 198 694 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Westhoff -Baker Ranch, Parcel 7, 1832 County Road 114, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Westhoff: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with your verbal authorization for geotechnical engineering services on October 8, 1998. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a single story double -wide modular home located on the property as shown on Fig. 1. A detached garage with a slab -on -grade floor may be constructed northwest of the residence as a future expansion. Cut depths are expected to range between about 2 to 6 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located southwest of the residence as shown in Fig. 1. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The proposed building site is located in the southwest area of the property. The site was vacant at the time of our field work. The ground surface in the building area slopes moderately down to the south-southwest. The area is vegetated with scattered juniper trees, sagebrush, grass and cactus. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating one exploratory pit in the building area and one profile pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of topsoil, consist of medium dense, light tan silty gravel with sand, subangular basalt boulders and cobbles. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the silty gravel (minus 6 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 3. Undisturbed sampling for compression testing was not practical due to the rock content. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist. Mr. Thomas J. Westhoff November 9, 1998 Page 2 Sinkhole Potential: The subject property is underlain by Pennsylvanian Age Eagle Valley Evaporite bedrock. The evaporite contains gypsum deposits. Dissolution of gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject building site. Based on our present knowledge of the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. In our opinion, the risk of ground subsidence at the building site is low but the owner should be aware of the potential for sinkhole development. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. The matrix soils would likely compress when wetted and loaded which could result in some post -construction foundation settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil, or oversized rock. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of sand and gravel should be placed beneath interior slabs to facilitate drainage and act as a leveling course. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve. H -P GEOTECH ' Mr. Thomas J. Westhoff November 9, 1998 Page 3 All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use of xeriscape to limit potential wetting due to irrigation. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on October 9, 1998 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the profile pit (Pit 2) shown on Fig. 2 and consist of silty gravel with sand, boulders and cobbles. The percolation test results are presented in Table I. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions H -P GEOTECH Mr. Thomas J. Westhoff November 9, 1998 Page 4 may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PA ; ►, e,y�� A, =CHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawl Reviewed by: ,,U4,J c x_e, Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/rso attachments H -P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 4000' BUILDING SITE -----"-j P 2 p 3 1 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 100' PROPOERTY----) BOUNDARIES PIT 1 PIT 2 • P 1 6 iini PROPOSED A A RESIDENCE 1 198 694 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Fig. 1 a 5 .....— 10 LEGEND: T PIT 1 - i +4=41 - J-20Dc32 PIT 2 _J TOPSOIL; medium brown silty sand with grass and sage brush roots, loose to firm, slightly moist, basalt cobbles and boulders on surface. 0 5 10 ._.,._ GRAVEL (GM); silty, sandy, with subangular basalt cobbles and boulders up to 2 feet diameter, slightly moist, medium dense, light brown. Disturbed bulk sample. Practical rig refusal. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on October 8, 1998 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit Togs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Depth — Feet 198 694 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 ;12110121 ai L 24 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN, 100 60 60 70 60 50 40 ao 20 10 0 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MN. 1 MIN. P00 U.S. STANDARD SERIES #100 /50 %30 116 j6 SIEVE ANALYSIS CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 14 3%6'1/2'3/4 1 1/2' 3' 5.6' ao r 1 1 i 1 T .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.16 2.36 4.75 9.512.5 19.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT SAND j FINE T MED#1M JCOARSE 198 694 GRAVEL 41 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND 27 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 37.5 75.2 12752 203 VL FINE ECOARSE SILT AND CLAY 32 % PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF: Sandy Silty Gravel with Cobbles FROM: Pit 1 at 4 thru 5 Feet HEPWORTH - - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL_, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS 100 1�1:�01>I`Mi:�2���U►121�7 Fig_ 3 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 694 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 52 5 Water added 8 6 3/4 1 1/4 6 6 3/4 5 1/2 1 1/4 5 1/2 4 1/2 1 4 1/2 3 112 1 3 1/2 2 1/4 1 1/4 6 1/2 5 1/2 1 5 1/2 4 3/4 3/4 4 3/4 3 3/4 1 P-2 48 5 Water added 6 1/2 5 1/2 1 6 5 1/2 4 3/4 3/4 4 3/4 4 3/4 4 3 1/2 1/2 6 3/4 5 3/4 1 5 3/4 5 3/4 5 4 1 4 3 1/4 3/4 P-3 50 5 Water added 8 1/4 6 3/4 1 1/2 7 6 3/4 5 1/2 1 1/4 5 1/2 4 1/4 1 1/4 4 1/4 3 1 1/4 6 1/2 5 1/2 1 5 1/2 4 1/2 1 4 1/2 3 3/4 3/4 3 3/4 3 3/4 Note: Percolation holes were hand dug in bottom of shallow backhoe pits and sampled on October 8, 1998. The percolation tests were conducted on October 9, 1998. INSPECTIONS WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS MANUFACTURED HOME BUILDING PERMIT GARF. ELD COUNTY, COLORADO dDate Issued. Area Permit NolOtll AGREEMENT 'In consideration of the issuance of this permit the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to zoning, location, construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Official and IMMEDIATELY BECOMES NULL AND VOID. Use rn 1-1 aboiliLdiffilnnr Address or g 1 Desc iption Owner Contractor INSPECTION RECORD Footing 21/4? li 1 �1.0 Foundation or Blocking 2. 'L'L/ ti em /L) .. q , Rough Plumbing Gas Piping 1)-11._q t 11-- \ Electrical Final (by State Inspector) ,1 Septic Final '3 -- 9 - 9 g ^ / /S2 S 2 I3 Final 3._ (q_9 3 -i7 -9q SI1- Notes: THIS1ERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 945-9159 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs,Colorado DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD APPROVED 2.• cri B Y Tt Date (IF PLACED OUTSIDE, COVER WITH CLEAR PL STIC)