HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report BOCC 11.17.94ExA zle-
ErB sE-
*,1- #;f;Jffiffi""r
REQTIEST:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SITE DATA:
WATER:
SEWER:
ACCESS:
EXISTING/ADJACENT ZONTNG:
BOCC ttnD4
An exemption from the definition of
subdivision.
Kafhy McCreary
A tract of land located in Section 10, T7S,
R92W of the 6th PM, located along the
north side of County Road 113 (Cattle
Creek Road), approximately three (3) miles
east of State Highway 82.
5.23 aqepat#t
Well
ISDS
Cattle Creek Road
A/R/RD
PROJECT TNFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
I.
II.
REI ATIONSHIP TO THIE COMPREHFNSI\rF PI AN
The site is located in District F - Rural Areas Major Environmental Constraints as
designated on the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Management Districts' Map.
site Descrintion: The site is located on the north side of County Road ll3,
approximately three (3) miles from State Highway 82. Theproperty is located
on the north side of the County Road, and includes a portion of the steeper
hillside. An existing home, (white/green 1880's two-story) is lccated on the
western portion of the site. A vicinity map is shown on page t 5 . , apd an
improvement survey showing the proposed lot split is shown on pagf-3 t-.
Proiect Dercrifrtion: The applicant is proposing to split the 5.23 acre parcel into
two (2) tracts of approximately 2.0 and3.23 acres in size.
o r-
A.
B.
III. MAJOR ISSITFS ANN CONCFRNS
Suhdivision Regulations. Section 8.52 of the Garfield County Subdivision
Regulations state that "No more than a total of four (4) lots, parcels, interests
or dwelling units will be created from any parcel, as that parcel was described in
the records of the Garflreld County clerk and Recorder's offrce on January l,
1973, and is not a part of a recorded subdivision; however, any paroel to be
divided by exemption that is split by a public right-of-way (State or Federal
highway, County roadorrailroad) ornatural feature, preventingjoint useofthe
proposed tracts, and thedivision occursalongthepublicright-of-way ornatural
feature, such parcels thereby created may, in the discretion of the Board, not be
considered to have been created by exemrption with regard to the four (4) lot,
parcel, interest or dwelling unit limitation otherwise applicabre;
The 5.23 acre parcel was part of a26.acre tract in 1968 @ook 39g, page g2,
Reception #242190). rn lg76,Georgewhipple created a 5 acreanda2lparoel
by the exemption process. The 2l acre parcel has not been further split.
Therefore, the request is consistent with Section 8.52. Due to theminimurn lot
size of two (2) acres in the A/R/RD zone district, only two (2) parcels can be
created from the five (5) acre tract. One exemption tract can still becreated from
the 2l acre parcel.
- ning- Both exernption parcels are consistent with the required two (2) acr€s
minimum lot size for the A/R/RD zone district.
kgal Access. The parent parcel is accessed direcfly from County Road ll3.
Cattle Creek Road is quite narrow through this section, and tapers to a singte
lane ofapproximately l2fetdirectly adjacent to theexisting house. Thespeed
Iimit through this section has been reduced to 15 miles per hour. Discussions
with King Lloyd indicate that the ability of this section of road to handle
additional traffic will be compromised by fuitheroremptions grantd in the area.
Adjacent property owneni have also voiced concern regar{ing the impact of the
exemption on the County Road (see tetters on pug..k l$.
The current exemption regulations do not specifically address county road
impacts, but staffwould argue that two references in Section 8.0 (Exemptions)
gives the Board the authority to consider access in their review.
Section 8.10 (Applicability) reads as follows:
"The Board of County commissioners has the discretionary power to exempt a
division of land from the deflrnition of a subdivision and, thereby from the
procedure in these regulations, provided that such exemption will not inpair
or ddeat the stated purpose of the subdivision Regulations nor be
detrimental to the general public welfare'(emrphasis added).
section 8.52 (Review criteria) includes the following specific criteria:
"Provision has been made for any required road or storm drainage
improvements."
A.
B.
c.
-2o
D.
It is difficult for staff to determine if the word "required" is referring to
improvements prior to the exemption request, or rather conditions of approval
tied to a specific application. State statute as well as case law requires that any
condition placed on the development must bear an "reasonable" relationship to
the relative impacts ofthe exemption. Due to the inadequate roadway width and
design deficiencies ofthe portion of thecounty road adjacent to theproject, the
cost associated with improving the road to current standards cannot be placed
entirely on Ms.McCleary.
However, staffhas significant concerns regarding the future subdivision of other
parcels in the area to the existing2-acre minimum lot size allowed under the
fuR/RD zone district. The infrastructure deflrciencies present constraints to any
increase in densities in the area, and can only be overcome within significant
investment. Staff is concerned with placing the County in a similarposition as
the Four Mile Corridor, where significant development was allowed to continue
without any long-range capital investment plans to address traffrc, water and
sewer impacts.
Water and Sewer. The applicants intend on serving the additional parcel using
an additional well. The State Engineer's Offrce has not responded to the
application.
SCS soil profiles for the si[e include MorvaUTridell (#87), Earsman (#33) and
Fluvaquents (#42). All three of these soil types areconsidered to have "SeverE'
constraints to both ISDS and residential structures. Staffwould suggest aplat
note requiring engineered septic tanks and leach Frelds.
State and Local Health Standards. No State or Local health standards are
applicable to the application, with the exception of Colorado Deparfinent of
Health ISDS setback standards, which should be verified by an engineer.
rrrainage. No drainage easements appearto be necessary, but should be verified
on the field by the applicant's surveyor.
Fire Protection. The Carbondale & Rural Fire Protwtion Districi has not
responded to the application, and staffwould suggest a letter from the District
be a condition of approval.
Easements. Any required easements (drainage, ac@ss, utilities, etc..) will be
required to be shown on the exernption plat.
School Imfract Fees The applicant will be required to pay the $200.00 impact fee
prior to the approval of the final plat.
Natural Hazards. Staffrefer.nr.l the Lincoln - Devore Laboratories Natural
Hazards Mapping for the site. The proposed exemption is located within an
area identified as having severc constraints for ISDS, major slope constraints,
major soil constraints, and both high ground water and solution of evaporite.
In addition, an active fan and landslide are shown directly south of the proposed
exemption. Staff would suggest that engineered foundations and ISDS be a plat
note.
E.
F.
G.
H.
T.
J.
,3'
TV. STTGGESTEDFTNDTNGS
l. That proper posting and public notice was provided as required for the meeting
before the Board of County Commissioners.
2. That themeeting beforethe Board ofCounty Commissioners wasextensiveand
complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues weresubmitted and that all
interested parties were heard at that meeting.
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption is in the
best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and
welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
V. RFCOMMENDATTON
Due to the current condition of the County Road adjacent to the site, staff has serious
concerns regardingcontinued approval ofexemptions in the area. Staffnotes that the
entire area has been identified for 10+ 1srcs per dwelling unit, due to issues zuch as
compatibility, road conditions, geologic constraints, and distance from urban servioes.
Thegeologic constraints aresevere, and arewell documented bythe Soil Conservation
Service and Lincoln-Devore Natural Hazards Mapping. If the Board finds that the
road is adequate and the physical constraints can be mitigated, stalf would suggest the
following conditions of approval:
That all representations of the applicant, either within the application or stated
at the meeting before the Board olCounty Commissioners, shall be considered
conditions of approval
A Final Exemption Plat shall be submitted, indicating the legal description of the
property, dimension and area of the proposed lot, access to a public right-of-
way, and any proposed easements for setbacks, drainage, irrigation, access or
utilities.
That the applicant shall have 120 days to present a plat to the Commissioners
for signature from the date of approval of the exemption.
That the applicant shall submit $200.00 in School tmpact Fees for the creation
of the exemption parcel.
5. That the following plat note shall appear on the Final Exemption Plat:
"Dueto geologic hazards on the site, engineered foundations and septic systems
will be required at the time of building permit submittal.',
6. control of noxious weeds is th; risponsiuitity of the property owner.
7. The applicant shall submit approval from the Carbondale and Rural firre
Protection District prior to signing an exemption plat.
8. Thatifanadditional drivewaywillbeneededfromtheCountyRoad,adriveway
permit shall be obtained from the Garheld County Road and Bridge priorto the
presentation of a final exernption plat.-
. F-*evt?rroJ aeJraP bvf*)
l.
3.
4.
-Drcc++ -
- Ptt-trfi e-a+<
t-lPrr I so(rtou ,
o1 a