Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationFINAL PLAT (1 original, 3 copies) Name:i✓e Check List: Final Plan: X.A9 24x36 mylar, 2" margins r/ Name, date, date of survey, North Arrow, scale, Vicinity Map, legal, Key to map sheet location and certifications, dedications. ✓ Tract boundary lines, streets, easements, lot boundaries etc... t/ Names of streets, and roads V Location of major drainages t7 Survey data tied to contral point, location of t/ Legal description Certifications: Alo Name and addresses of owners and mortagagee 1/ Totals: acreage, lots, acreage devoted to each ✓ Refrence to any protective covenants ✓ Certificate of Dedication and ownership ✓ Title Company on Attorneys Certificate V' Surveyor's Certificate ✓ Planning Commission Certificate ✓ County Commissioners Certificate Np Recorder's Certificate VD,' /4e/ 4q moi- survey monuments use. 1/4 '/ G)/// �LC� Supplemental Requirements: Letter from subdivider stating preliminary plat is valid for final plat, or that revised information will be furnished. /%O Fee '9$•4e2... 3 copies of covenants V Engineering plan cost estimates ,/ Subdividers improvements agreement Comments: a-jGs/) fy AaD& SU,J4,-'1J/-5O/e 2. /3d/ie.- e 3. / ec. /2//4r, ,ie // .-,0 6 / f .Z slit a 'dce-ss es 2. D, - it. 64 s.. ? ' .9i/0i• 71 w 4774 1.-A 46/k/ r74 . aw4.e—ps /-r'.G //M PAS/ !J 60L/ / 74T-/ CQSG �G�1117�_`5 /1•0719--///9i�"D GC! 8 q.D/e- /o• 99'2_ FINAL RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION first filing Garfield County, Colorado January 10,' 1983 RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION First Filing FINAL PLAT INFORMATION Table'of Contents Owner - Developer Letter of Submittal 2 Mortgagee Dedication 3 Adjacent Landowners Mineral Rights Owners Subdivision Summary Form Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Location - General Information Lot Standards Domestic Central Water System Irrigation System Sewage Disposal System Road Systems 14 Construction Phasing 15 EXHIBITS Colorado State Health Department A Colorado State Highway Permits B Ray D. Walker, PE Well Uses C Irrigation water rights D Engineer's Improvements Estimated Cost E Improvements Agreement F ATTACHED BOOKLETS Covenants I Drainage Report II OWNER -DEVELOPER: -1- Ann Catherine (Kay) Robinson 0015 - 251 Road Rifle, Colorado 81650 ph. 625-3663 MORTGAGEE: Rhoda Miller Brewer NAME OF SUBDIVISION: RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION First Filing SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS: Solar Country P.O. Box 163 Silt, Colorado 81652 ph. 876-2222 GEOLOGY - SOILS: Lincoln DeVore 2510 Glen Avenue - P.O. Box 1427 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 -2 - Garfield County Commissioners Garfield County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision First Filing Gentlemen: Ann .C. Robinson 0115, Co,., Road .251 Rifle, CO 81650 ,June 2, 1982 Submitted herewith for the above named subdivision are the preliminary plat and accompanying materials .for Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision First Filing. Each of the lots in the proposed subdivision contains two acres or more in area; this is in keeping with the minimum requirement in the agricul- tural rural residential zone in which this subdivision lies. As stated in the Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions which accompanies this submittal, only single family residential usage shall be permitted within this subdivision. Included within the soil and geological. report are the conclusions and recommendations of the testing laboratory regarding the percolation tests performed on the site. The individual homeowners shall be responsible for obtaining further tests to be used in the design of the sanitary sewage disposal system for each of, the. lots. I request that this plan be considered as expeditiously as possible by' the Board of County Commissioners and the Garfield County Planning Commission. Thank you for your consideration of this plan. Very truly yours, Ann C. Robinson -3- • RATIFICATION AND DEDICATION WHEREAS, prior to the date hereof, ANN C. ROBINSON caused to be filed in the Clerk and Recorder's Office of Garfield County, Colorado, a plat designated -as Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, which plat was recorded, as Document,No. ; and WHEREAS, the undersigned is the ,beneficiary of a deed of trust encumbering the real property being the subject of said plat, which deed of trust is recorded in Book 4.1-3 at Page 2/2 , Garfield County Records; and ,. WHEREAS, the undersigned desires to join in the platting of said real property; NOW T:1EREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the undersigned does hereby ratify in all respects said plat and the statements contained therein and does hereby grant to the County'of Garfield; Colorado, for public use the streets shown thereon including avenues, streets and access r;.ghts of way, the public lands for. their use and the drainage and utility easements for drainage and utility purposes. . IN .WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby affix my signature Rhoda Miller Brewer STATE OF NEBRASKA ) n COUNTY OF.. q ) s s . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged to before me this ' Q . day of April, 1981, by RHODA MILLER BREWER. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires Nota Publ -4 - ADJACENT LANDOWNERS Dorothy E. and Thomas L. Emmer 1471 State Highway 325 Rifle, CO 81650 Carroll Wilson Pierce Mangurian 1980 State Highway 325 Rifle, CO 81650 4 Mile Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 MINERAL RIGHTS, Mineral Search as to Lots 3 & 4, Section 19, Township 5 South, Range 92 West.of the 6th P.M. for Ann C. Robinson . .Ray G. Sykes. and Mary Sykes: l= An undivided 36 interest in and to the mineral rights as reserl in instrument recorded February 11, 1954 in Book 275 -at Page 3-*, Reception No. 134334. Cecil Vernon: Undivided interest in all oil, gas and other minerals, with the right to mine, drill for and otherwise remove the same as reserved in instrument recorded February 27, 1961 in, Book 332 at Page 598, Reception No. 213021. W. F. Scarrow and Myrtle E. Scarrow: An undivided 1/8 interest in and to all oil, gas and other minerals with the right to mine, drill for and remove the same as reserved _a Book 400 at Page 163, Reception No. 242886. Ann C. Robinson: An undivided 1/8 interest in and to oil, gas and other minerals conveyed to her in instrument recorded December 24, 1973 in Book 453 at Page 210, Reception No. 261147. G. Date -5- SUBDIVISION SUMMARY FORM Garfield County June 1, 1982 Subdivision Name: Type of Subdivision Request for Exemption Preliminary Plan Final Plat Filing 1 RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION - First Filing Location of Subdivision TOWNSHIP 5S RANGE 92W SEC. 19 T.O 3&4 Owner(s) NAME ADDRESS Subdivider(s) NAME ADDRESS Designer NAME ADDRESS Ann Catherine (Kay) Robinson 0115 251 Road, Rifle, CO (same) 81650 ph. 625.-3663 Solar' Country P.O. Box 163, Silt, CO 81652 ph. 876-2222 Type of Subdivision Number of Area -% of Dwelling Units (Acres) Total Area Single Family Apartments Condominiums Mobile Home Commercial Industrial 16 N.A. N.A. Dedicated Reserved Dedicated Reserved Street Walkways School Sites School Sites Park Sites Park Sites Private Open Areas Easements (Water System) Other (specify) (Colorado State Highway 325) 1.169 36.608 _ 75.92 5.676 U 77 4.473 0.296 9 75 0j1 ?f�.7 Total 48.227 1nn_nn Estimated Water Requirements Proposed Water Source Wells Estimated Sewage Disposal Requirement ,npn Gallons/day. Proposed Means of Sewage Disposal In ividuaLsent; r rank Qrama 8,000 Gallons/day.(domestic us_ only) ACTION: Planning Commission Recommendation Approval ( ) Remarks Date Disapproval ( ) Board of County Commissioners Approval ( ) Remarks Date , 19 Disapproval ( ) 19 —' A.1 _ • -6- RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION First Filing LOCATION: The Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision is located in Lots 3 and 4 ('WzSW'U) of Section 19, Township 5 South, Range 92' West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, approximately two miles Northerly of the City of Rifle, and less than one mile Southerly of the Rifle.Creek Golf Course, along Rifle Creek. .• ... GENERAL INFORMATION: The• Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, has been designed for the existing Garfield County Zone District A/R/RD with 16 lots, 2 acres or larger, for a single .family development. The development will have its own central water system, with individual septic tank sewage systems. The road systems are residential and mountain road classifications. Electrical and telephone services are within the development. This development abuts the BLM lands and access has been provided for the homeowners and public. This development is adjacent to the Rifle Creek Estates Subdivision. Colorado State Highway No. 325 runs Northerly along and through the development. -7 - LOT STANDARDS All lots in the Rifle Creek .Ranch Subdivision, first filing are designed as 2.00 acres or more. The smallest lot contains 2.00 acres and the largest lot is 3.25 acres; average lot size is 2.29 acres. The present Garfield County Zone Dist ict is A/R/RD and shall remain the. same. BLOCK 1 consists of 31.68 acres with eleven (11) lots having 25.47 acres,.a 1.64 acre Common Area and 4.57 acres for roads. The Common Area'abuts BLM Lands and provides access to the BLM lands. A bridal path is designated through Lot 6 within the Bureau of Reclamation transmission easement right-of-way, along the lot line between Lots 5 and 6, within the rights-of-way of Blue Sage Drive and Cedar Ridge Drive to and through the Common Area and to the BLM Lands. Also a bridal path is designated within the utility -drainage easement between Lots 10 and 11. to the Common Area. All lots have slopes exceeding thirty (30) percent; however, approximately one (1) acre or more of each lot is under a thirty (30) percent, slope, all being adequate for building sites. Envelope Building Blocks have been designated on the final plat for Lots 1, 2 and 10. The existing'BLM_Access road as now being used shall remain as shown through Lot 1 with access from Cedar Ridge Drive. BLOCK 2 consists of 15.37 acres with five (5) lots having 11.14 acres, a 2.83 acre Common Area, and a 0.30 acre Water System utility right-of-way, and 1.10 acres for roads. Rifle Creek wanders in and out of Lots 2, 3 and 4 which are subject to the 100 -year flood plain. Envelope Building Blocks have been designated on the final plat for lots 2, 3, 4 and 5. COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO. 325 runs Northerly along the East side of Block 2 and between Block 1 and 2. That portion of the highway between Blocks 1 and 2 consists of 1.17 acres and is shown as being within this subdivision. ' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS are shown and described on the final plat with approvals by Public Service Company and Mountain Bell Telephone Company. TOTAL LAND USE AREA: Block 1 Block 2 = 31.68 acres = 15.37 acres TOTAL DEVELOPMENT = 47.05 acres US Highway # 325 = 1.17 acres (not owned by developer) TOTAL LAND USE = 48.22 acres, more or less -8— DOMESTIC CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM' GENERAL INFORMATION: The Rifle .Creek Ranch.Subdivision, first filing.; .consists..of .sixteen (16)• single family dwelling lots which shall be served by a central water system. The supply source will be two wells which together average.24 gallons ver minute (GPM). A Plan of Augmentation has been.completed and was submitted -in the Preliminary packet_ along with the well permits, drilling reports, pump tests and. water quality report. This system has been designed to accomodate an'additional•fourteen•(14) lots which may be platted and developed in the future. An additional storage tank would be built and mire wells would be extended to this system when additional lots are added. The total system, when developed, would serve a total of thirty (30) single family dewllings, as outlined in the Plan of. Augmentation,,, The system for filing one is planned to be constructed in—two.(2)*phases.' The first phase would consist of all furnishings with the exception of,the main service„ lines to the lets in Block 1. The wells, chlorinator, Tank No. 1, main 8 inch line to Tank No. 1 with lateral service main, plugged extensions and all mains and services within Block 2 would be installed. The second phase would consist of the service mains and service lines to the lots in Block 1. Phase I would be installed within three years after final plat approval. Phase II would be installed within five years after' final plat approval. The developer shall install the central water system at her cost and guarantee all materials, equipmentand installation of the water system fora period' of one year after final inspection and approval of Phase I and/or Phase II. The developer shall also make any repairs or replacements to correct any defects caused from poor installation or faulty materials or equipment and shall guarantee' -such repai or replacements for a one year period thereafter corrected and approved. In addition, the developer shall guarantee Well No. 1 to produce an average of 10 GPM (over a test period of 12 hours) and repair or replace the pumps and equip— ment within the water system damaged by sand from Well .No. ..1 for.a. period, of three (3) years from the date of the subdivision's final plat as filed with Garfield County. In the event the sand concentration within. the water causes unacceptable. water quality or damages the system and its operation, the developer shall be re— sponsible to rehabilitate or replace Well No..1 within the three (3) year time period. Once the central water system is installed in Phase I and Phase II, approved and accepted by the county and/or State, the system shall be owned, operated and 'maintained by the Homeowner's Association.(more fully described within the Homeowner's Association' and'Protective Covenants for Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision). The developer shall reserve the right to extend water mains, install water storage tank No. 2, install additional wells, and other water facilities required by the County and/or State to And/or from the future additional 14 lots or single family dwellings, if and,when ,such additional lots are created and approved by Garfield County. -9- CALCUALTIONS: As set forth by the Plan of Augmentation, the consumptive uses are: 340.0 30.0 34.5 gal / gal / gal / day / day / day / household use / lot one head of livestock /lot irrigation use / lot Average 414.5 gal / day / total comsumptive use allowed / lot Also based on 500 gal / single family dwelling for fire protection per Garfield County Subdivision Regulations, a peak day demand'of 2.5 days and the 16 lot subdivision, storage demands are as follows: 16 x 414.5 = 6632 gal / day comsumptive use 16 x 500.0 = 8000 gal fire protection storage (16 x 414.5 x 2.5) + 8000 = 24,480 gal storage required WATER LINE VOLUMES: 26,000 gal. 10,000 gal. 36,000 gal. WELLS: 1780 ft. 8" PVC pipe = 4748 gal. 3440 ft, 6" PVC pipe = 5053 gal. 350 ft. 3" PVC pipe = 129 gal. TOTAL PIPE VOLUME = 9830 gal. ._.. buried .steel water storage tank no. 1 -planned average pipe system volume average - systems total volume Well No. 1 ave. = 10 GPM Well No. 2 ave. = 14 GPM TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 24 GPM Due to the low flow rate and use of almost frictionless PVC pipe, friction loss' is minimal and not considered within the calculations. PUMPING TIME: Empty system Daily use Well No. 1 only Well No. 2 only, 36,000 gal. 6,632 gal. 6,632 gal. 6,632 gal. 4. 24 GPM - 60'min. - 25.0 hrs. 24 GPM 60 min. = 4.6 hrs. 10 GPM = 60 min. = 11.0 hrs. 14 GPM 60 min. _ ..7.9, hrs. Tank max. elevation full level = 5,828 ft. Well average pump elevations = 5,640 ft. Elevation difference = 188 ft. PUMPING TIME CONT'D: -10- Max. pressure = 188 2.31 = 79 PSI 40 PSI at elevation 5,730 ft. 20 PSI at elevation 5,776 ft. The following table provided approximate building elevations for each lot and fire hydrant elevations and the static head at tank half full (elev. 5,822), pressure and size of main line at each lot and hydrant. Site Static Elevation Head Pressure Main Size Block 1 Lots. 1 5,760 62 26'.8 6" 2 5,805 (min.) 17 7.4 * 8" 3 5,790 32 13.8 -, 8" 4 5,785 37 16.0 ;; 6" 5 5,770 52 22.5 * 6" 6... .5,710 .. 112 48.5..., 6" 7 5,715 107 46.3 6" 8 5,720 102- 44.2 6" 9 5,725 97 42.0 . 6" 10 5,735 87 37.7 6" 11 5,745 77 33.3 6" (* = 1" service line) Block 2 Lots 1 5,675 147 63.6 6" 2 5,670 152 65.8 6" 3 5,670 152 65.8 6" 4 5,670 152 .65.8 6" 5 5,680 142 61.5 6" Fire Hydrants No. 1 5,790 32 • 13.8 8" 2 5,735 87 37.7° 6" 3 5,730 „ . . . 92 39.8. ... . .. ,.6" 4 5,745 77 33.3 6" 5 5,730 92 39.8 6" 6 5,675 147 63.6 6" 7 5,670 152 65.8 6" Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1 will have one (1) inch service lines and taps from the main. It is recommended that an in-line booster pump be installed during the construction of houses on these lots to boost the pressure for household facilities to a maximum of 50 PSI. The service line behind the booster pump shall be reduced to a 3/4 inch size. It shall be the responsibility, of the lot owner or contractor to install their own in-line pump on said lots. All service lines from the main line to the homes shall be Type "K" copper pipe with copper fittings. • —11— Seven (7) fire 'hydrants are -located within the subdivision -on an average of a 300 foot radius to building sites. Fire hydrants shall be, or meet the standards of, an A-423 Mueller Centurion Fire Hydrant with'a connection for'pumper truck, and shall have threading and connections as per the Rifle Volunteer Fire Department Requirements. WELL INFORMATION: Well No. 1 is located near Rifle Creek and sand was apparent upon commencing the pump test. The pump was lowered gradually to a depth of 23'8" over the first 10 hours, with flows ranging between 9.5 GPM and 12.5 GPM being produced. At the 12th hour, the pump was lowered 12.9 feet more to a depth of 36'5" and over th .4 hour period to the 16th hour.the well reduced its flow to 4.0 GPM and continued reduction to less than 2.0 GPM for the balance of the 24 hour pump test. It appears that upon the 12th hour the rapid lowering of the pump placed it in a sandy area and the pump clogged with -sand. The well was drilled on 8/22/80 and was not used or pumped until the pump test conducted on 4/7/82. During the time between drilling and testing sand was able to gather in the well. The elevation of the water in Rifle Creek is approximately 20 feet below the.top-of We11'No. 1 and it is assumed that sand could enter the well in the saturated area allowing the bottom 15 feet of the well to collect the sand over the period the well was not used. Well No.1 will be pumped to clear the sand and in the event the sand continues, the well will be rehabilitated or replaced prior to connection to -the system or if sand becomes a problem after connection to the system. There appears to be no problem with Well No. .2,.and none is anticipated. Well permits, driller reports, pump tests, water quality reports and Plan of Augmentation are as submitted in the Preliminary Packet.. See Exhibit "A" for data from the Colorado State Health Department. See Exhibit "E" for. Estimated Costs. -12 - IRRIGATION SYSTEMS Irrigation or sprinkling shall be restricted to a maximum area of 1,000 square feet of lawn and garden per lot supplied through the domestic water system as described by the Plan of Augmentation. The developer will dedicate 0.50 cubit feet of water per second supplied by a spring and seepage water within the Common Area of Block 2 diverted to the Robinson Ditch, to the Homeowner's Association. This water can irrigate all of Block 2 independent from the domestic water system.. The Homeowner's• Association may install an irrigation pipe system independent of the domestic water system to provide irrigation water to all lots. This water is decreed conditionally in the Disctict Court in and for Water Division No. 5, Application No. 81CW280 April 15, 1982. The developer reserves the right to construct an irrigation pipe line independent from the domestic water system to any lots created in the future outside the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, first filing from said ditch and may dedicate additional water rights to the Homeowner's Association in the event such irrigation water rights become inadequate. See documents for irrigation rights in Exhibit 'IP. -13 - SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS The Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, first filing, will use individual septic tank and leach field systems for each lot designed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado, and as approved by the Garfield County Environmental Health Department. No evapotranspiration sewage disposal systems shall be permitted under the conditi .s set forth in the present Plan of Augmentation dated January 6, 1982. In addition, each individual sewage system shall be designed to enable future connection to a Central Collection and Treatment System which could be constructed in the Rifle Creek Valley in the near future, eliminating'individual syptic systems in the valley. -14- • ROAD SYSTEMS There are three new roads within this subdivision to be constructed along with Colorado State Highway No. 325 bounding the East side of Block 1 and the West side of Block 2. All rights-of-way, including the State Highway are 60 feet in width. Acceleration and deceleration lanes will be constructed on the State Highway at the entrance of Cedar Ridge Drive serving Block 1. Improvements on the highway for the entrance of Creek Side Drive serving Block 2 will be performed. All improvements made on the highway will he in accordance to the .StateHighway Department Specifica- tions and as shown on the plans for this subdivision. All roads will be constructed with a 26 foot road bed width with a four foot shoulder. ,Sub -base material exists within Block 1 at an old gravel pit site and will be used for the roads within this subdivision. No grade exceeds an 8 percent grade or a side slope of 12'to 1, except'as approved by the C'ounty'Road Superintendant. All roads will be chip and seal, and constructed in accordance to the Garfield Cour,y Road Department Specifications and as shown on the plans for this subdivision. See Exhibit "E" for materials and Estimated Costs. -15 - CONSTRUCTION PHASES PHASE I: 1. Water System: Includes all. water system in Block 2, all piping and installation of facilities to and including water storage tank No. 1, both well -No'. land No. 2, Chlorinator,'and-extenSionS with valves for Phase II. 2. Road System: 'All of Creek Side Drive, highway' entrance improvements; all of Block 2. Excavation of materials for Creek Side Drive off Cedar Ridge Drive, 3. Electrical and Telephone Systems all in Block 2. Phase I is anticipated to be completed within three years of the Final Plat approval. PHASE II: 1. Water System: Includes the balance of water mains and facilities within Block 1. 2. Road System: All roads in Block 1 including reconstruction of detention pond. Highway 325 deceleration and acceleration lanes and is planned to be constructed within the time limits of the permit. 3. Electrical and Telephone Systems all in Block 1. Phase II is anticipated to be completed within five years from date of Final Plat approval, however, due to economic conditions this phase may require additional time. See Exhibit "E" for materials and estimated costs. Name: . Address: City: Where Collected: Collected by: • CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF LABORATORIES CHEMISTRY SECTION Anio\') ‘Aso - c/o 5o1arr C4vyN4ry. PO. (o to 't /0 MG,\r � I , Cc) /(, rF l' Creek QavchWe 11( /oae) C L k - Lab. NO. �( �411-2 ) Date Samples: Date Received: Date ' Reporte Va5 a rrieriw, repo rt - Mandatory Parameters Mandatory Results Limits Non -Mandatory Parameters' Suggested Limits Results Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium • Fluoride Lead Mercury Nitrate plus Nitrite As Nitrogen Selenium, NONE 0.05 mg/1 : DETECTED ,.NONE. :DETECTED 1. mg/1 0.010mg/1 0.05, mg/1 2.4 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 0.002 mg/1 10 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 Sodium Recommended 20 mg/1 Silver 0.05 mg/1 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons. Pesticides Endrin Lindane Methoxychlor Toxaphene Herbicides 2,4 - D 2, 4, 5, , TP Radioactivity Gross Alpha Gross. Beta Radium 226 Radium 228 Uranium 0.0002 0.004 0.1 0.005 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 0.1 mg/1 mg/1 reU\ks -to 4)-e Fr0't kt2615 pCi/1 50 pCi/1 5 pCi/1 pc4/1 0.01 0,00' NONE DETECTED NONE DETECTED 0,011 NONE + FrTFD.. Total Alkalinity Dissolved Solids 'Specific Conductance Iron. Manganese. Copper Zinc mg/1 500 mg/1 .Micromhos 0.3 mg/1. 0.05 mg/1 1.0 mg/1 5.0 mg/1 Molybdenum Total Hardness as CaCO3 Calcium as CaCO3 Magnesium, „ Chloride Sulfate mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 1,25, mg/1 250 mg/1 .250 mg/1 Name: Address: City: Where Collected: Collected by: CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF LABORA1ORIES CHEMISTRY SECTION v11\. C ROYJ►vor. c%O �o Sc-l-oC C V -V ry PO $oie\ )JO Si IA)CO 1�5� R Pk C eek We11 d r{Zip Code) Q • tilt►e Lab. NO. "''(0.r)&1 Date, Samples: pate ,Received :.' j --1 Date Reported:( - JU _ hienrr reppFt Mandatory Parameters ,Mandatory Limits Results Non -Mandatory • Parameters' Suggested Limits" Results Arsenic Barium' Cadmium Chromium Fluoride Lead Mercury Nitrate plus Nitrite As Nitrogen Selenium 0.05 mg/1 1. mg/1 0.010 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 2.4 mg/1 0.05 0.002 10 0.01 Sodium Recommended 20 Silver 0.05 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Pesticides Endrin 4.0002 Lindane 0.004 Methoxychlor 0.1 Toxaphene 0.005, Herbicides 2,4 -,D ' 2, 4, 5, - TP Radioactivity Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 226 Radium 228 Uranium mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1' mg/1 mg/1 mg/I mg/1 mg/1 0.1 mg/1 0.01 Mg/1 be ITC` 15 i'ja1'}c''` 50 pCi/1 NONE DETECTED NOME 'DETECTFD C�J.QUO8' 'NONE j WECTED 0 ,LIQ ► NONE DETECTFn x.0\5, NONE' DETFCTED 5 pCi/1 pCi/l Total Alkalinity Dissolved Solids • Specific Conductance Iron Manganese Copper Zinc Molybdenum Total Hardness as CaCO3 Calcium as'CaCO3' Magnesium chloride . Sulfate. 500 mg/1 mg/1 Micromhos 0.3 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 1.0 mg/1 5.0 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg// 125 mg/1 :250 . mg/ 1 250 mg/1 Name: Address: 2ity: There Collected: 2ollected bv: • CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF LABORATORIES CHEMISTRY SECTION /4/VA/Ca c • Pu br/VSo/✓ C/o 5 L4/' (' Cir'f RV P G ` 1G3 (Y/o /iv sT 1.r Co. (�i6 /2. /1 e r,zep X /QA#/c (!.2 / de) C' Lab. NO. (p r% 0 " Date Date Date Samples: ,c')- 7 -4'1' Received: G Reported: L (% 4andatory ?arameters Results ; Non -Mandatory MCL* Parameters MSL** Arsenic 0.05 mg/1 3arium 1. mg/1 2admiun 0.010 mg/1 2hromiur 0.05 mg/1 2.4 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 •Iercury 0.002 mg/1 Fluoride :ead • Titrate plus Nitrite 10 mg/1• ks Nitrogen 3eleniu.•n 0.01 mg/1 odium Recommended 20 mg/1 Silver 0.05 mg/1 2hlorinated Hydrocarbons 'esticides Endrin 0.0002 Lindane 0.004 Methoxychlor 0.1 Toxaphene 0.005 ierbicides 2,4 - D 0.1 2, 4, 5, - TP 0.01 radioactivity Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 226 Radium 228 Uranium * Maximum contaminate mg/1' mg/ 1, mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 15 pCi/1 50 pCi/1 5.pCi/I pCill Level Total Alkalinity Dissolved Solid' Specific -Conductance Iron Manganese Copper Zinc Molybdenum Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/1 5'00 mg/1 ' Micromhos 0.3 0.05 1.0 5.0 Calcium as CaCO3 Magnesium Chloride Sulfate 125 250 250 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 Results I ** Maximum suggested Level ANN/ . Name: Address: City: ;'here Collected: Collected by: Mandatory Parameters CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF LABORATORIES CHEMISTRY SECTION C R� ,,wso.v C% Sa 40 (cc', v -f-Ry Po P X (G3 R-, o /777/1/4/. /�•��e- CRPCk (L "iZ Conde) ( Ly Lab. NO. 6 1/ o Date Samples: ^ rgA Date Received: C -1-S- " a' •2 - Date Reported: F - / /42 - Mandatory - b'2 - MCL* Results Non -Mandatory Parameters MSL** Arsenic 0.05 Barium' 1. Cadmium 0.010 Chromium 0.05 Fluoride Lead Mercury Nitrate plus Nitrite As Nitrogen Selenium 2.4 0.05 0.002 10 0.01 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 Sodium Recommended 20 mg/1 Silver 0.05 mg/1 Thlorinated Hydrocarbons ?esticides Endrin 0..0002 mg/1 Lindane 0.004 mg/1 Methoxychlor 0.1 mg/1 Toxaphene 0.005 mg/1 ierbicides 2,4 - D 2, 4, 5, - TP ladioactivity Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 226 Radium 228 Uranium 0.1 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 'E Maximum contaminate 15 pCi/1 50 pCi/1 5 pCi/1 pC all Level Total Alkalinity Dissolved Solids Specific Conductance Iron Manganese Copper Zinc Molybdenum :ng/1... 500 mg/1• . Micromhos 0.3 0.05 1-. 0 5.0 Total Hardness as CaCO3 Calcium as CaCO3 Magnesium Chloride Sulfate 125 250 250 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/ 1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1. mg/1 Results ** Maximum suggested Level • o COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Richard D. Lamm a X * Frank A. Traylor, M.D. Governor 18 7 6 Executive Director September 30, 1982 Ann Robinson 115 Road 252 'Rifle, CO 81650 • RE: Additional analyses needed on water from both wells 111 and 112, Rifle Creek Ranch Water System, Garfield County Dear Ms. Robinson: This Department has received the proposed plans and specifications for • the Rifle Creek Ranch Water System. The chemical analyses submitted shows two areas.that need further, attention. First, the sodium content for both wells was analysed to be 305 mg/1 compared with the recommended limit of 20 mg/1. Although this is only a recommended limit, sodium intake needs to be restricted in persons with hypertension or heart problems. Before water of this high sodium content can be delivered to the public, the residences need to be notified of this condition. Secondly, the radiological analyses for both wells showed high alpha and beta counts. In order to subtract the portion due to uranium, additional analyses need to be performed on the waters from both wells to determine the uranium counts. . The mandatory limits for gross alpha is 15 pCi/1. If the adjusted alpha pCi/1 is greater than 15 •pCi/1 *the water would not b'e'allbwed, to'be de- livered to the public. If this water is, used as a source, proper treatment to remove these radiological parameters would have to be constructed.... , These additional analyses need to be usbmitted in order to continue the review of this proposal.. If you have any questions, please call me at 320-8333, extension 3454. Sincerely, Michael Mau Technical Review Engineer Drinking Water Section xcr John Blair, District Engineer Terry Howard, Garfield „County Health MM/db .s. -.•. Ate. err a r+a nnnnn r,, it tIP' /nrsnl �]nr1_ii �i�ri ame: 3dress: ity: here Collected: Dllected by: 1 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF LABORATORIES CHEMISTRY SECTION A.C. Robinson 0115 Rd 251 Rif1e,•GO 81650 Well 1 (Zip Code) Kay Robinson Lab. NO. 82907:. Date Samples: 10/05/82 Date Received: 11/09/82 Date Reported: 12/09/82 andatory Mandatory Results arameters Limits Non -Mandatory Suggested Parameters Limits Results rsenic 0.05 mg/1. Tltal Alkalinity mg/1 arius 1. mg/1 Dissolved Solids . • 500 -•mg/1 admium 0.010 mg/1 Specific Conductance cromhos hromium 0.05 mg/1 Iron 0.3 mg/1 luoride 2.4 mg/1 Manganese 0.05 mg/1 ead 0.05 mg/1 Copper , 1.0 mg/1 ercury 0.002 mg/1 Zinc 5.0 mg/1 itrate plus Nitrite 10 mg/1 Molybdenum mg/1 s Nitrogen elenium• 0.01 mg/1 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/1 odium Recommended 20 mg/1 -Calcium as CaCO3 mg/1 ilver 0.05 mg/1 Magnesium •'125 mg/1 :hloririated Hydrocarbons Chloride 250 mg/1 •_ pesticides Sulfate 250 mg/1 Endrin 0.0002 mg/1 Lindane 0.004 mg/1 Methoxychlor 0.1 mg/1 Toxaphene 0.005 mg/1 1 ferbicides 2,4 - D 0.1 mg/1 2, 4, 5,,= TP 0.01 mg/1 Ladioactivity Gross Alpha 15 pCi/1 10+8 Gross Seta 50 pCi/1 18+10 Radium 226 Radium 228 ' Uranium .5 pCi/1 pCi/1 Name: Address: City: Where Collected: Collected by: Mandatory Parameters Arsenic Barium Cadmium CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER- - COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH *COLORADO OF LABORATORIES CHEMISTRY SECTION A.C. Robinson 0115 Rd 251 Rifle, Colorado 81650 (Zip Code) Well #2 Lab No... 82'079 Date Sampled:10/05/82 Date Received:11/08/82 Date Reported: 1/25/83 MCL* 0.05 mg/1 1. •'mg/1 0.010 mg/1 Results Chromium 0.05 mg/1 Fluoride 2.4 mg/1 Lead 0.05 mg/1 Mercury 0.002 mg/1 Nitrate plus Nitrate 10 mg/1 As Nitrogen Selenium 0.01 mg/1 Sodium 20 mg/1 Silver 0.05 mg/1 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Pesticides Endrin 0.0002 Lindane 0.004 Methoxychlor 0.1 Toxaphene 0.005 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 Herbicides 2,4 - D 0.1 mg/1 2, 4, 5, - TP 0.01 mg/1 Radioactivity Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 226 'Radium 228 Uranium * Maximum 15 pCi/]. 50 pCl/1 5 pCi/1 pCi/1 contaminate Level 25 + 10 17 + 10 0.2 + 0.1 15.6+1.4+ Non -Mandatory' Parameters Total Alkalinity Dissolved Solids Specific Conductance Iron Manganese Copper Zinc Molybdenum Total Hardness as Calcium as CaCO3 Magnesium Chloride • Sulfate MSL** mg/1 .500 mg/1 Micromhos 0.3 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 1.0 mg/1 5.0 mg/1 mg/1 CaCO3 mg/1 mg/1 125 mg/1 250 mg/1 250 mg/1 ** Maximum suggested Level JAY ICAi`WATERTEST,; ASEWATER 8 SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. SOX 5700 j NOWMASS VILLAGE, FO. 11615 Sample Lout * • NAME OF TIM M1 'SUPPLY 't CHLORINE • ;. :w� • ' RESIDUAL ) ROUTINE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SUPPLY Air CHECK SAMPLE ( •' ) PROCESS WATER ,•1) RAW (,r ),GROUND (•• ) SURFACE Yotl SPECIAL' PURPOSE. SAMPLE NOTSUPPLIED,'THE SAMPLE WILL ' MG/L } SAFE 0 W UNSAFE ❑ • .'•''��Y'?:'. UNSUITABLE LT •r . RESULTS. }'+ j R TESTch q: :K Confluent growth, or TNTC, as reported on the accompanying slip, indicates excessive amount of growth, possibly coliform ,bacteria. The water supply should be treated before additional examination. le, so that Please return this slip with your repeat sampwe can better evaluate your water. T.AND1l11D IACTEAIOLOGICAL"WATER TEST SNDWMAtB WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT , • BOX 5700' ,EIIOYMMASS YRIAOE, C0.'1.11815 ..r Sample Location NAME t TIME . 4•SUPPLYFI t .4, it I"4 • f»y'• CHLORINE. RESIDUAL', ~"T�uO/L ROUTIIIE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM,SUPPLY,' , i , ); CHECK,SAMRE (• :. ) PROCESS WATER `. �)�r) AAW;}'(,; a) SROUND ( ) SWAMI, ):'SPECIAL PURPOSE SAMPLE $UPPUEO, THE SAMPLE WILL ' SEE•REiEWSE. • . n ji• ITAtION$ $AMPLI " INSTRUCTIONS AND INITIONS. FE " DIRECT kVERIFIED 'PADJUSTED COUNT; • UNSAFE • RESULT*''':Y. MEMBRANE FILTER 7`11 oct `': COLI►ORM/100 � . LAURYL SULFATE ISOT . 'MPN • • COLMORAl%TODMI+�. �;� AES�UIT� OREATEIA THAN ONE "•ax's; COLIFORM PER. 100 ML 01DICAT r.: NON-COMPLIANCE WITI4 MINIMUU. DRINKING WATER STANDARDS i',Tc MEMBRANE FILTER ` h'. -fn - . : �:«' "5 DIRECT : '7"!V 1 G IVERIFIEO ADJUSTED ip COUNT: .: r '_ • . COLIFORM/ 1'00 ML < <• •LAURYL SULFATE BROTH, -, f Z ‘0.4 :'Y.t'....!� ,.r ..c 'O '': ;. aa '1.F rg ` • : _ ft 24 .. a� ,, • �� , 4B 3 1 • , �. iL• MPN:1,•': ,:!;..."!.:•:,'2,.; COUFDRt 1DOMI' . •: RESULTS GREATER THAN ONE', '..-',•c, •. •Y�• ;4' COLIFORM PER 100 ML INDICATES,a NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM, ;•t y, ''DRINKING WATER' STANDARDS ;'. q: :K Confluent growth, or TNTC, as reported on the accompanying slip, indicates excessive amount of growth, possibly coliform ,bacteria. The water supply should be treated before additional examination. le, so that Please return this slip with your repeat sampwe can better evaluate your water. T.AND1l11D IACTEAIOLOGICAL"WATER TEST SNDWMAtB WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT , • BOX 5700' ,EIIOYMMASS YRIAOE, C0.'1.11815 ..r Sample Location NAME t TIME . 4•SUPPLYFI t .4, it I"4 • f»y'• CHLORINE. RESIDUAL', ~"T�uO/L ROUTIIIE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM,SUPPLY,' , i , ); CHECK,SAMRE (• :. ) PROCESS WATER `. �)�r) AAW;}'(,; a) SROUND ( ) SWAMI, ):'SPECIAL PURPOSE SAMPLE $UPPUEO, THE SAMPLE WILL ' SEE•REiEWSE. • . n ji• ITAtION$ $AMPLI " INSTRUCTIONS AND INITIONS. FE " DIRECT kVERIFIED 'PADJUSTED COUNT; • UNSAFE • RESULT*''':Y. MEMBRANE FILTER 7`11 oct `': COLI►ORM/100 � . LAURYL SULFATE ISOT . 'MPN • • COLMORAl%TODMI+�. �;� AES�UIT� OREATEIA THAN ONE "•ax's; COLIFORM PER. 100 ML 01DICAT r.: NON-COMPLIANCE WITI4 MINIMUU. DRINKING WATER STANDARDS i',Tc Exhibit "B" STATE OF OLORJ DO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS P.O. Box2107 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 - 2107 (303) 242.2862 245-0795 October 6, 1982 Solar Country P. O. Box 163 Silt, CO 81652 Attn: Christine M. Lytle Dear Ms. Lytle: The Division of Highways has no problem with your waiting until next spring to build the"Acceleration/Deceleration'lanes for the Cedar Ridge Drive Access.. The Access Permit allows you one year from the date of the Permit, which was signed by our office August 3, 1982. R. P. MOSTON DISTRICT ENGINEER by Thle-4e1 8r/. Mickey gurke ROW Agent MB:rb cc: Ann Catherine Robinson file DoH torr e 1 Rev. 3 uNs% State HighwaySMP 12,..1Y 325 -T 2 + 1056' �� �� Local Jurisdiction Garfied C'ptmt<r Exhibit- B MICE Section/Patrol 306 i6 DOH Permit No. 6.9g02 Required Permit Fee: Yip .00 'STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PERMIT FOR ACCESS The property owner, /-\:-7-1 U.7I727T•1E ^0137;•?Sn7 to construct an access approach on the FAST (herein calledermit, a is granted of permission feet Snrrrr; ,�,, side of State Highway 325p , a distance of • 1350 ' from milepost - -- also known as U''IQ O ENT purpose of obtaining access to 5 c:1Tr'r'? FA'?TTY n,:,cTTYTTC S The access a• , for the maintained and used in accordance with the State Highway Access Code, the terms andconditions of this permit, sroach shall be ite e requirements noted below, and listed attachments. This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access approach and its use violate any of the terms and conditions of this permit or the State Highway Access Code. The use of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades and flagmen are required at all times during access approach construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the MANUAL 'ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, Part VI. The Department of Highways and its duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action or damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. SITE REQUIREMENTS PEP2.2SSI03 GPATIIED rtSTA L A"I ENTP - ATS ON 'IH EAST SIZE OF SH 325 FOR ACCESS FOR 5 • SINGLE..FA= " ESII7:TC ;S. 7I -IP F2IT ANC,I; '10 BE 24' WIDE AND MUST BE BUILT ik' so 'TILT IS A LVDIUG '10 STOP ON B.7, , I r_Ii'ERLIc 'rte. TtIG.17.Ay. THIS TIJST SLOPE AWAY FPSI4 1E -E HI.1 •,A_ AT 27. T'� IAST 21" OF FILL '10 BE 12" OP6" r�,•, y A,S1xIALT I`J P'•'.CP1'','T7 LINE. ...IF TO /\,�'P'-7AI,'r IS 1, OF CLASS 6 IF AS�iAL?TD 3" OF G'AV�, T.rjTI 'I;!'; Lc;�' Sir 3/4"• � rrr r . PIACI, '>� FILL ?MILL '3;; A �P �1�TJL�'. PIT �Tt1tiG'�'J) T.7I' err, �rJJS'- T _DAA_- BASE. '^TIS AIL TO -BE CCI�PA,v.i) '1) 957 M•�SI'7.m A..__O.1 ?FOITL''r L�i:1T`' ADEOTTATE Si. Cr.tp CULVF:P� WILL BE PLACED L,• 'T} -TF �R� �I'I'C►T. DI?PL:dG ?.'F??: I':T 7�*' �rT,T T.Ttn`TTnT(' (' T 'r�T SIGNS, ,, ',T � �n I..0 Tt^�TI�?'�T 3E J i . DI INC; D n, , 7 _ CONS _ . I ICTIOT T S I ..�..S , FlA'PEPSONS AND B .A PRI GAD7S r'T Tom; , TA1TUAL C .1. TITLF7',Y '?'�! P IC CC.TATPOL ..T�4:VIC7S," �_� EN/ MAY _r+� C,? 3U7' '-'TLST T.?c:�>r' POSTS CU '''�T''1-;;� Cz•� ,-�-� � -.. Mir LT, ... i'E )STS ; , 7r ,T , .. ,..0 r Pfl1 ,,LY, ETD Fi :TC S'r^�T,TCI�:n, I n^^.. ' SPO-TS.T_T U T_TY O.c ' "�T TE7...7.i'11.% IF -F C 7... I. TCi''=�f'T--,�+ `_!O ta1LS',' A '1�7A''7 �T �*.;r 7.iT�r�^;, � TP.P�1'.LC T''T'�..I TSS T;,�r:y0g 'a ' 1�S•ACCEL. 'EC►M LAPES MAY BTs �T ETE ri L -IT; I'.a7.1..' .17 ' 7.7 p--'r.•rr ?S .. A1Y ,ISTURB:7) PT' . /'•�- A •'� j^I`i'T71' . r+r�r OF '1' TTc p*,*r A ',� '1Y? BF r� TTlzz^Tr') ' 0 On,I' 7t:'TLiL COI`TTOI?'? 11_.Tn A -- -..,.,P'T'T'. ' 0 BE ON •TTU J03 DURINCOONSTRUCTIC11. PALS • T) STATE (here the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority, local approval is required prior to approval by the State epartment of Highways. IUNICIPALITY or COUNTY '(X) 'ATE OF COLORADO, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS V. HAASE, CHIEF ENGINEER Date Title 'X) Date Title on the signing of this permit the permittee ar -yes to the terms and conditions and referenced attar-hmcntc ein. A coov of this Herm:• c.,, ,_,`_ Division of Highways DOH Form 101 Rev. August, 1981 • Exhibit "B" State Allay No/MP S.H.32'; - - Local Jurisdiction Garfi 01d ( • • . 1- %, MTCE Section/Patrol (7,74F.n6c,r1.1, DOH Permit No Required Permit Fee 7rnn Paid t3 Stt STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PERMIT FOR ACCESS • • Cathr:Tin0. Robinson The property owner, A;ln (herein called permittee) is granted permission to construct an access approach on the J'!rSt side of State Highway 'FT , a distance f ln feet cr''' • from milepost :1_92 V also known as C: riS ri rnc , for the purpose of obtaining access to 1' r 1 V r^r". AC11C The access approach shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with the State Highway Access Code, the terms and conditions of this permit, site requirements noted below, and listed attachments. This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access approach and its use violate any of the terms and conditions of this permit or the State Highway Access Code. The use of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades and flagmen are required at all times during access approach construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, Part VI. The Department of Highways and its duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action or damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. SITE REQUIREMENTS ".0.1 '17:17T-Lks!(-1..1: 525••0/ CA.? 17‘cl.,A., LF t' 1 /:'c.17) '217T77` 1 T''777.17.S T.7113, 77.07.71717.7 17`..-17 12' 91L.; 3,;,:,CLI: 272.) x -N 1 JT 2 va.:7z r)17 275 ' IT r T..7dil 77. rilkr:57.) r'71;717. 12" (.7'57 (71AzT 1, C51 ' 6 , (07- 1 017 C-77..!1 T.." , IT.;? it) 7 ',37 .'‘.7.1 7T .1 7-7 C.:: 7"i (.2 57. t2-..:71_71-: f;Ti.-..7fit..',7:) 17.7! ': 7:,77.7:7,77- -17 7 •C, 7777, I 3'21 1: TIP L*T... 7. 7. i.:77.• r.:7:1177. t177:1",757. •A- • Ti7-.1; T 1 r .;. • n 77. , ,f .17: 7_7,1 7. 77.7.3• 17.1: 27/ky F27 P. 7.17 E7.7, 71.17-f1U17,17:10 7.F'D71'.1r, 0.1! ?,7. . ; .tCt STP1C*7.171 Where the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority, local approval is required prior to approval by the State Department of, Highways. ' . . MUNICIPALITY or COUNTY By(X) Date Title STATE OF COLORADO, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS E.N. HAASE, CHIEF ENGINEER (1 - ' By(X) • Date - Title •. Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained Exhibit "C" Colorado Water Rights Analyst Registered Profes! nal Engineer Water Well Drilling RAY D. WALKER, P.E. 406 South Hyland Park Drive/ Suite D / Glenwood Springs/ Colorado 81601 Phone 303: 945-9165 or 625-3260 SOLAR COUNTRY Dennis 0. Bradley P.O. Box 163 •Silt, Colorado Dennis, August 28, 1982 Re: Rifle Creek Ranch I have reviewed Hal Simpson's letter of.July 7,.1982.to the Garfield County Planning Department regarding Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision. Well Permits 109310 and 112781 can easily be amended when the wells are actually used and the statements of beneficial use can then be completed. Please let me know when someone begins using the wells so that these forms can be prepared. As Mr. Simpson points out, the augmentation plan does nc contemplate the use of evapotranspiration beds therefore your suggestion that each unit have an engineer design an appropriate system other than ET is proper. At this point I see no reason for me to comment on the flood plain defined by 32,500 cfs. As we agreed, keep me advised of any correspondence regarding water or water rights. cc Kay Robinson cerely, Ray D. Walker P.E. Exhibit "D" Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision 0115 Rd 251 Rifle Co. Attached Documents to confirm absolute water rights of .50 CFS from a spring to the Robinson ditch to irrigate approx. 25 'ac Water rights to become property of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Homes owners Association, 19 homes sites east of highway 325. Homes owners assoc. will be responsible for construction and maintenence of sprinkling system. Water to be, stored in ponds and pumped to sprinkle 19 homes sites South of water source and East of hwy 325. iC "", . IN THE DISTRICT -COURT IN AND FOR WA'r'JH .DIVISION. NO. 5 ` STATE OF COLORADO Application No. W-2292 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) FOR WATER RIGHTS OF ANN CATHERINE ROBINSON ) IN THE COLORADO RIVER OR ITS TRIBUTARIES ) TRIBUTARY INVOLVED: RIFLE CREEK ) IN GARFIELD COUNTY ) ,FI.I_i_ INi1'ATE. DiV:SiMi t",(,. , , •,/.-;E: QF CO!. r, RULING OF REFEREE ::v rr.-tity y. The above entitled application was filed on April 24, 1974, and was referred to the undersigned as Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, by the Water Judge of said Court on the 1st day of May, 1974, in accordance with Article 21 of Chapter 148, Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, as amended (Chapter 373 S.L. Colo. 1969), known as The Water Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969. And the undersigned Refgree having made such investigations a: are necessary to determine whether or not the statements in the application are true and having become fully advised with respect to the subject matter of the application does hereby make the following determination and ruling as the Referee in this matter, to -wit: . 1. The statements in the application are true. 2. The name of the structure is Robinson Ditch. 3. The name of claimant and address is Ann Catherine Robinson, 1980 State Highway 325, Rifle, Colorado. 4. The source of the water is springs and seepage water tributary to Rifle Creek, tributary to the Colorado River. 5. The point of diversion is located in Section 19, Township 5 S., Range 92 West of the 6th PM, at a point South 89° 51' 35" East 741.48 feet from the West Quarter Corner of said Section 19. 6. The use of the water is'irrigation. 7. The date of initiation of appropriation is April 1, 1974. 8. The amount of water claimed is 0.5 cubic foot of water per second of time. 9. The water has not yet been applied to beneficial use. 10. The,waer will be used to irrigate 25 acres of the applicant's land. Exhibit "D" • The Referee does therefore conclude that the above entitled application should be granted and that 0.5 cubic foot of water per second of time with appropriation date of April 1, 1974, is hereby awarded conditionally to the Robinson Ditch for irrigation use provided always hat said 0.5 cubic foot of water per second of time is on the condition that quantity applied to a beneficial, use within a reasonable said uantit of bea li time; subject, however, to all earlier priority rights of others and to the integrationand tabulation by the Division Engineer of such priorities. and changes of rights in accordance with law. Application for a Quadrennial finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed in August of 1978 and in August of every fourth calander year thereafter so long as claimant desires to maintain this conditional water right or until a determination has been made that this conditional water right has become an absolute water right by reason of the completion of ,the appropriation. It is accordingly ORDERED that this ruling shall., be filed wit the Water Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing, subject to judicial with the appropriate Division Engineer and the State Engineer. review pursuant to Section 148-21-20 CRS 1963 as amended (1971). It is further ORDERED that a copy of this ruling shall be day of Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, )S7 Vo protoOt ,gas filed in thin r..attcr. The foregoing ruling is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgment and Decree of this court. Dated: 1t �+'.tnl thi , v w..n.ww 'iter Judge 1974. BY THE REFEREE: Water .B'iioree'^ Water bivision No. 5 State of Colorado this filed Exhibit "I)" IN THF DISTRICT COURT IN ..AND. FOR OATEN DIVISION NO 5 STATE OF COLORADO Application No. 81CW280 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) FOR WATER RIGHTS OF ) ANN CATHERINE ROBINSON ) IN THE COLORADO RIVER ) OR ITS TRIBUTARIES ) TRIBUTARY INVOLVED: RIFLE CREEK ) IN GARFIELD COUNTY ) FILED lid DiS.I P,iCi COURT 1'!.V =`? C''.VIEiC l 5, COLORADO f.PR 1' 1.9`;? MA E S A I =l, RULING OF REFEREE The above entitled application was filed on October 23, 1981, and was referred to the undersigned as Water Referee for Mater Division No, 5, State of Colorado, by the. Water Judge of said Court - on the 16th day of November, 1981, in accordance with Article 92 of Chapter 37, Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, known as'The Water Right. Determination and Administration Act of.1969,. And the undersigned Referee having 'made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether. or not the statements in the application are true and having become fully advised with -respect 'to the subject matter of the application does hereby make the following determination and ruling as the Referee inthis matter,. to -wit:. 1. The statements in the application are true. 2. The name of the structure is Robinson Ditch. 3. The name of the claimant and address is Ann Catherine Robinson; 0115 County, Road,251; Rifle, Colorado. 4. The source of the water is springs and seepagL water tributary to Rifle Creek,"tribu'tary to the Colorado River. 5. The point of diversion is located in Section 19, T. 5S., R. 92 W. of the 6th P.M. at a point S. 89051'35" E; 741.48 feet from the [West Ouarter Corner of said Section 19_ 6. On 'August 26, 1974, in Case No. t•'-2292, the Pater Referee for dater Division No. 5 awarded to the Robinson`Ditch, a conditional water right for 0.50 cubic foot of water_ per. second o� time,' to be used for irrigation, with appropriation date of April 1, 1974. The claimant was directed to 'file an application for quadrennial finding of reasonable diligence in the development of this conditional water right in August of 1978. This Ruling of the Referee was confirm- ed and made a Decree of the Court on November 11, 1974. 81CW280 Exhibit "D" 7. On June 28, 1979, in Case,No. 11 -2292 -78, -the Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, found that the claimant had exercised'reasonable diligence in the deveolpment of the conditional water right, and that,0.10 cubic foot of water per -second of time had been diverted and applied to beneficial use. The Referee ruled' that said 0.10 cubic foot of water per second of time be made absolute and unconditional, and that the remaining 0.40 cubic foot._ of water per second of time be continued in full force and effect as a conditional water right. This Ruling of Referee was confi?-ed and made a Decree of the Court on August 13, 1979, 8. On October 23, 1981, the claimant filed, in Water Court for Water Division No. 5, an application to make absolute a conditional water right in which it is requested that the 0.40 . cubic foot of water per second remaining as a conditional water right awarded to the Robinson Ditch, be made absolute and unconditional by reason of the completion of the appropriation and application of the water to beneficial 'use in accordance with the original Decree.. In support of this request it is stated by the applicant 'that drainage pipes have been installed to divert the water o the ditch and that an additional .15 acres of land'have been cleared and irrigated with water from the Robinson "Ditch. The Referee does, therefore, conclude that the above entitled application should be granted and that 0.40 cubic foot of water per second of time, date of priority, April 1, 1974, decreed conditionally to the Robinson Ditch for irrigation use be made absolute and unconditional: It is accordingly ORDERED that this ruling shall. be filed with the Water Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing, subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 37-92-304 CRS 1973. Itis further ORDERED that a copy of this ruling shall be filed with the appropriate Division Engineer and the State Engineer. Done at the City of Glenwood Sprin.gs,...Color.ado this /6-7-5—( day of App/Cr ,.1982. No protest was filed in this miter The foregoing ruling Is confirmee and approved, and Is made ;nc Judgment and Dec eeofthis COL' f• Dated: JD BY THE REFEREE r Referee ter Division No. 5 State of Colorado Exhibit "D" 81CW280 7.' On June 28, 1979, in Case No. W-2292-78; the +later' Referee for. Water Division No..,5, found that„the claimant, had exercised reasonable diligence in the deveolpment of the conditional water right, and that 0.10 cubic foot of water per second of time had been diverted and applied to•beneficial'use. The 'Referee ruled • that said 0.10 cubic foot of water per second of time be made absolute and unconditional, and that the remaining 0.40 cubic foot of water per second of time be continued in full force and effect as a conditional water right. This Ruling of Referee was confirmed and made a Decree of the„Court on August 13, 1979. 8. On October 23, 1981, the claimant filed, in Water Courtfor Water Division No. 5, an 'application to make absolute a conditional water right in which it is requested that the 0.40 cubic foot of water per second remaining as a conditional water ight awarded to the Robinson Ditch, bemade absolute and .unconditional by reason of the completion of the appropriation and application of the water to beneficial use in accordance with the original Decree. _In support of this request it is stated by the -applicant that drainagepipes have been installed to:divert the water to the,., ditch and that an additional 15 acres of land have been cleared and irrigated with water from the Robinson Ditch. The Referee does, therefore, conclude that the above entitled application should'be granted and that 0:40''cubic"foot'`of water per second of time, date of priority, April 1, 1974, decreed conditionally to the Robinson Ditch for irrigation use be made absolute and unconditional. It is accordingly ORDERED that this ruling shall be filed with the Water Clerk' and shall become effective upon such -filing, subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 37-92-304 CRS 1973. It is further ORDERED that a copy of this ruling shall be filed with the appropriate Division Engineer and the State Engineer. Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado this i5 day of 44/2iZ/4, , 19,82.,. BY THE REFEREE r Re eree Iter Division No. 5 Exhibit "E" IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE The following cost estimates are based on information gathered in September, 1982 based on the owner being the contractor and installing all improvements except electrical services. Costs include on site materials to be used. These cost estimates are not to be used for bid items and may fluctuate depending upon time elements, economics and on site materials. Refer to page 15 for'Construction Phase Items. PHASE I 1. Water System 2. Road System Creek Side Drive 3. Electrical System 4. Construction Surveys and Engineering $52,000.00 11,000.00 7,500.00 1,000.00 PHASE I ESTIMATED COST $71,500.00 PHASE II 1. Water System. $34,500.00.. 2. Road Systems Blue Sage Drive $20,500.00 Cedar Ridge Drive 45,000.00 Highway Entrance lanes. 12,500.00 Gulch crossing on Cedar Ridge Drive. No. Detention Pond. (with Detention Pond structures add $3,000.00) 7,000.00 TOTAL ROAD SYSTEM 3. -Electrical System 4. Construction Surveys and Engineering 85,000.00 35,000.00 4,000.00 PHASE II ESTIMATED COST $158,500.00 PHASE I & II TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $230,000.00 (Average cost per lot for construction cost $14,375.00) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Project Name //l=GC= O,��Lr1'S/6,(/d/i Project Number /3//"5-25'Z ITEM ITY JCC(.(/—�c ,da A/d 6"IVe J4, 7L i2- UNIT 86,0 d ,o e_ vf-2 w//, GF: �p 6,OT" //A'LP �„//mal %/ r7 / J 15 4 2/, - 1,4euu i --e . IL= 1= !/,QL Vc= �/ ,�.(/Ec. 6-0-0 .- 4 ,GT a i BGG D.(l,I j&767_ anf/J/-27-1nx/5 306/6-75 TANK si p AIL .,4 . C,d L5 ;,4 6-4 Prepared by: Date: Exhibit "E" Page // of UNIT PRICE 1 TOTAL 1 */42 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Project Name Pr. _ 2ct Number /e/5732 Exhibit "E" Page ITEM 1' ANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE 1 TOTAL ,dui , /JJ Z T r4 (/,u - ,G 5� � W,�TE,� 66 re- 7-.1 /wc ;o„mac G5 270 i . *Prepared by: C!--7434 Date: V27/97.-- c _ 'ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Project Name Project Number /6/6282 ITEM 1 QUANTITY --),4i,oSC Z /`-'. .GSE . 7-4L • UNIT Exhibit " Page 3 of 5 UNIT PRICE L TOTAL Prepared Date: WZ//hz- E"(1INEER'S ESTIMATE Project Name Project Number. /25/`5,6 ITEM JcZ h" 1QUANTITY UNIT Exhibit "E" Page / • of UNIT PRICE - 1. TOTAL 1 (8<oCK - 2 dU T /qr,1�/,v (q /-1A �) : �Q,�i � /rF A/Ira-el-4fG 4/10/ 0,04/) • 25,4fC (�/� �Al/1/ ) a91frd7Z To 9'5'% /8 " 01-4 JO a dA/A/4. "CIID <'�ri O. Xeo ; G- 72,-7-AL . �,cl�sC 1 To>,o L ),;) • (DA1 .I45(54n C 44n,yi,; �e e 7_ 7_ 4oAiz.)) YD' T(J .30 LF Prepared by: Dare• (_, I / c- w 1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -Project Name /?1//=-64.: C°,enc Project Number ITEM /3/5v Z 1QUANTITY 1 UNIT 1 -7-;7-At Z�5 Block /) Exhibit "E" Page e of 6 - UNIT PRICE 1 TOTAL . Prepared by: Date: ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Project Name L l :Project Number /8/56Z ITEM QUANTITY cP , : :/40 UNIT J J D /6/ j/D3 47- leiE (F///lA spj(j •i/7-- Ik•d7L---,e/iL. ,2,:fLW_.- ZZ40 /03A/4' E (34# /-4Q),/, d oti, d 7-&- TO 9) o /.A0 C70/e / Z. //2/1 C- 7,� Exhibit "E" Page 3 of 5 UNIT PRICE ! TOTAL Prepared by: C� X20 UNIT /5- ENGINEER'S ESS��TIMATE Project Name ZJFL/P,Q,(Je,(t Project Number /S/�jBZ ITEM o/7), :7-Zel7-4/4e- 1QIANTITY T CO E/P,e4A7- 8t(q"&f/ v��c/��r' Nf e7''l_ iffaz, au. 700 0)% d tiA 7 36" ?/JP 760 • x./7D nG/TG- e-7 /o>,ei 3 " % /6 ie -/o ,af/oxiztG l./ 1/ TD 1/D 7AJ5 G� 3 C -t3 9 Prepared by: Date: Exhibit "E" Page of -7 UNIT PRICE 1 TOTAL 17Z/4 z— ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Project Name �j,CGL ,CE� /4_,4,(iC Projt,:t Number / /'j�j2 ITEM - 23ANTITY 1 UNIT A:55 (I3/ "aisfAdeTe-D '7n- E.Oe ro/2� o T A41,1-5- 7Z- —707—A /1),i4-" r-/-,clre,e,u 7O7 -„i V,,15c= Z 1-i", 4ZornGig Prepare Date: Fxhibit "E" Page 5 of UNIT PRICE TOTAL I July' 29, 1982 'lamQ r t.. Exhibit "E" public Service Compzmj P.O. Box 152 Rifle, Co 816 Kay Robinson 115 Co. Rd. 251 Rifle, Co 81650 Dear Kay: As you requested, we have prepared an estimate to install 120/240 volt, single phase,' underground electric facilities to serve Lots 1 through 11, Block,1 and Lots 1 'through 5, Block '2 in' .Rifle' Creek •Ranch Subdivision. Your cost to have these facilities installed is 02,438.00 payable i ad- vance of construction. Thisrefundable construc.tion_depo5'tis subject to refund in accordance with Company Tariffs on file. In addition to your deposit, there will be a charge to the builders for the underground service laterals from our secondary pedestals to the meter loca- tions. This cost will be billed in accordance with the schedule of prices in effect at the time of installation and is not subject to refund. Installation of service is contingent upon the following: 1. Extra charge if customer builds house more than 250 ft from PSCo. facility. 2. All necessary easements and right of way must be granted. 3. Construction ahead of paving and concrete work. 4. Property pins must be installed. 5. Site must be to grade (plus or minus six inches) 6. Water and sewer must be installed and past our easement. 7. Route of.trenching must be clear of obstructions. Execution and return of the enclosed contracts will release the job for construction. Payment of the above mentioned construction charge is deferred until we notify you 10 days before our crews are scheduled to start actual construction. Please notify'me as soon -as possible if you plan -to continue with t. t project.. This estimate is valid until September 27, '1982. If I can be. of further assistance, please feel free to contact.me. Sincerep%ly Bud Graham Consumer Service Representative BG:lb EXHIBIT "F" SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT DRAFT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of February,, 1983, by and between Ann Catherine Robinson (hereinafter called "Developer") and the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, State of Colorado (hereinafter called "County".) being the parties hereto: WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval of the Final Plat of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, agrees to enter into a Subdivision Improvements Agreement as provided for by Section 30-28-137, C.R.S. 1973, as amended, and Section 3.10.01, Garfield County Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the same authority, Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral. sufficient in the reasonable judgment of the County to make reasonable provision for completion of certain public improvements set forth on Exhibit attached hereto and incorporated herein; and pnt WHEREAS, Developer has agreed to provide collateral to guarantee performance of the terms and " conditions of this Agreement including construction of the above -referenced public improvements by means of a performance mortgage on lots hereinafter designated; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mtatual covenants, terms, conditions, and promises and in consideration of the approval and recording of the final plat of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, Developer and County ,agr.ee as follows: 1. Developer agrees to construct, and install,, at, her own expense, all those public improvements set forth on Exhibit A. 2. The Developer agrees that all of those certain public improvements above referred to contained in Phase I of the development shall be constructed within three (3) years after recording of the final plat herein. Construction of said improvements in Phase II shall be completed within five (5) years after said .recording. Phase I is Block 2 on the Final Plat; Phase II is Block 1 thereon. All such construction shall be in compliance with the following: (a) All final plat and other documents submitted by the Developer and approved by the County at the time of final plat approval. (b) All laws of the United States, State of Colorado, County of Garfield, affected special districts and/or servicing authorities. (c) Garfield County construction standards. (d) State of Colorado Highway Department standards and access improvement criteria. (e) Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, or other matters submitted by Developer to and approved by the; above -stated governmental entities. 3. To guarantee performance by Developer of her obligations as set forth herein, Developer agrees to execute and deliver to County prior to recording of the final plat herein a performance mortgage on the following real property: Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block One, Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing . 4. It is further mutually agreed that pursuant to the provision of Section 30-28-137(2) C.R.S. 1973, as amended, that as improvements are completed, or upon substitution of certificates of deposit or letters of credit for each lot equal to 1/8 of the then estimated cost of .completing all improvements, which substitute sec,urityshall be deposited, with the, county, the Developer may apply to the County for a release of said mortgage on each such lot. Immediately upon inspection and approval of all completed improvements, the County shall release all collateral. If the County determines that any such improvements are not constructed in substantial compliance with above specifications, standards, or requirements, County shall furnish Developer with a list of specific alleged deficiencies and shall be entitl`d to withhold only sufficient collateral to insure such substantial compliance. If the County determines correctly and in good faith that the Developer has not or cannot construct any or all of the improvements in accordance with said specifications, standards, or requirements, the County may proceed to foreclose upon said mortgage and shall apply the proceeds of such foreclosure sale as may be necessary to construct said improvements in accordance with this agreement. 5. It is further mutually agreed that upon the completion of all improvements herein in substantial compliance with the provisions hereof that Developer shall then be entitled to a prompt release of the mortgage or other collateral herein. 6. Developer agrees that title ,to the above_mortgaged. real property. shall . be. me.rchantable in. De.veloper. free and cle r of liens and encumbrances except the deed of trust forthe benefit of. Rhoda Miller recorded in Book 453,at Page .212, Garfield County Records. 7. The County hereby agrees to the approval of the final plat of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, subject only to the terms and conditions hereof. 8. The parties hereto mutually agree that thib agreement may be amended from time to time in writing signed by said parties. 9. This agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the parties hereto. -3- • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first written above. COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF GARFIELD By Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County ATTEST: Deputy Clerk of the County DEVELOPER Ann Catherine Robinson STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing, instrument was -acknowledged before me on this day of February, 1983, by as Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County and , as Deputy Clerk of the County. My commission expires: Notary Public Address The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me or this day of February, 1983, by Ann Catherine Robinson, as Developer. My commission expires: Notary Public Address EXHIBIT A Details of street improvements, water distribution system, electricity, telephone systems, etc., including proposed cost of each component. DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS. By this declaration made this27th day of December , 1982, Ann C. Robinson, hereinaftercalled the "Declarant", who is the owner of the herein described property, more fully described on Exhibit A, known as Rifle -Creek Ranch Subdivision First Filing, subjects Lots 1 through 11 in Block 1. and Lots 1 through 5 in Block 2 of said real property, hereinafter called "the Lots", to the conditions, covenants, and restrictions as set forth hereinafter for the benefit of the property and its purchasers. 1. Limitation on Use. No lots within Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision shall ever be occupied or used for any purpose other than single family dwellings and accessory uses, public and common uses related to single family dwellings. 2. Prohibition of Resubdivision. No lot described on the recorded plat of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision shall ever be resubdivided into smaller tracts or lots nor conveyed or encumbered in any less than the full original dimensions as shown on said recorded plats; provided that conveyances or dedications of easements for utilities may be made for less than all of one lot. 3. Amendment and Termination of Covenants. The covenants contained in this instrument shall be amended or terminated only upon the written consent of all owners of the Lots and the Board of County Commissioners"' of Garfield County, Colorado. ATTACHMENT I 4. Waiver. Failure. to enforce any provisions of these covenants shall not constitute a continuing waiver of the right to enforce any , Provision. 5. . Severability. Should. any.. partor parts .of these covenants be declared invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining covenants. 6. The conditions hereof and those attached hereto as Exhibit B constitute this declaration of conditions, covenants and restrictions. • �CJ Ann C. Robinson, Declarant STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged to before me this27th day of December , 1982, by Ann C. Robinson, Declarant. My commission expires: August 31, 1983 Notary P 1091 Road 300, Parachute, Colorado 81635 -Address EXHIBIT B PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION, FIRST FILING LOCATED IN GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1. Land Use. The property in said Subdivision is intended to be developed for single family residential purposes only in a rural setting and motif and with all structures designed to blend into and compliment the natural'surroundings. Lots"1 through 11 in -Block 1 and Lots 1 through 5 in Block 2 in the RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION, FIRST FILING, shall be used for residential purposes with only one (1) habitable dwelling per lot.: Only two (2) outbuildings shall be at least 400 square feet each on the ground. level and consistent with, the„ architecture, of the main dwelling. No elevated tanks, towers or structures are allowed. No building or structure intended for or adapted to business, commercial or manufacturing purposes, nor any multiple family dwelling, shall be erected, placed, maintained or permitted upon such property. Subject to the other provisions in these covenants, use of any lot for pasture of horses or the'raising of crops when a dwelling shall first have been constructed thereon shall not be construed as being incompatible with residential purposes. 2. Homeowners Association..(a) A non-profit corporation will be organized under thlaws of the State of Colorado, the name of which will be "RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION" (Association). The Association„ will own and be responsible for repair,replacement, maintenance, alterations, and upkeep of: any private"community roads or easements; all common utilities with the subdivision, including the domestic and irrigation water systems; and land and recreation facilities on "Common Area". The Association will also be responsible for the enforcement of these Protective Covenants, and shall have- such• other duties as are prescribed_by its Articles of Incorporation and corporate bylaws. (b) Each individual or entity or ,combination of owners upon acquiring title to a lot in the Subdivision shall automatically become a member of the Association and shall be entitled to one (1) vote in the Association on all matters. There shall be one (1) vote for each lot regardless of the number of individuals or entities owning any lot. (c) The board of directors .of the Association may assess each member a fee at all appropriate times to cover the costs. of maintenance. and improvements to the property and facilities owned by the Association or for which the Association is responsible, and for such other special purposes as determined 9 p so levied by a majorityof ,the votin members. Each assessment shall become a lien on the land and im rovements of each owner in said Subdivision to the extent of the assessment levied. The -1- Board of Directors shall be entitled to maintain an action in the District ,Court of, Garfield .County, Colorado, for the purpose .of recovering any unpaid assessments and for the purpose of foreclosing the lien against the lands and improvements of the defaulting lot owner. Damages may include costs, of said action plus reasonable attorney's fees. (d) Two (2) water supply sources shall be provided for the subdivision in-house domestic system and irrigation system. 1. The in-house domestic system will be supplied by two (2) wells and distributed by a Central Water System. No irrigation water shall be permitted from, the domestic system, except for Lots 1 through 11 in Block 1, which shall be restricted to not more than 1,000 square feet of lawns and gardens per lot. (See Pla- of Augmentation attached hereto.) In-house domestic water use shall be limited to 100 gallons per person per day per lot, and Thirty (30) gallons per day per. one (1) head of livestock per lot. OD SEE PAGE CAVD) 7/on/ ) 2. The irrigation water shall be separate from the central, water system. 0,.50 cubic foot of water per second supplied by a spring and seepage water diverted to the Robinson Ditch as made absolute and unconditional for irrigation of twenty-five (25) acres, is available for Block 2. The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for distribution of the irrigation''water to the lots within -Block 2. e) The adjacent land owned by Ann C. Robinson or her successors shall reserve the right to use and/or add to both the domestic and irrigation systems, and develop the roadway entering onto Creekside Road in Block 2, when that land may be developed as part of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision in the future. 3. Water Augmentation Plan. (a) The Association and each lot owner shall comply with all of the terms and requirements of the Plan of 'Augmentation, decreedin Case No. 81CW56 on February 10, 1982, by the Water Court, Division No. 5, sittin' at Glenwood Springs, Colorado. Said Plan of Augmentation, atta..hed hereto and, made a part of this section, covers the out -of -priority consumptive uses of water drawn from the wells serving this subdivision. (b) In addition to the accounting required to be made to the appropriate officials of the Division ofNatur,al Resources, State of Colorado, the Association shall, have the duty of enforcing the specific water use limitations found in said decree.,. to wit: in-house domestic uses, irrigation of no more than 1,000 square feet of lawns and gardens per lot, andstockwatering of one (1) head of livestock per lot, or as otherwise described herein. (c) Pursuant to the provisions of said decree and a stipulation reached in said case, this section of the protective covenants is specifically made for the benefit of the City of Rifle as well as in favor Of Other lot owners in this subdivision. The City of Rifle .hereby is granted the right to take enforcement action against any individual lot owner/owners whose water Ise exeeds the limitations in the decree. 4. .Architectural Control Committee. (a) The board of directors of the Association will appoint an ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE (ACC) consisting of at least three (3) members, any of whom may be a member of the board. No building or fencing shall be erected, placed, or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the structure of fence have been approved in writing 'by the ACC. • No grading or landscaping shall be undertaken without the prior approval in writing of the ACC. No natural vegetation within Lots 1 through 11 in Block 1 shall be disturbed without approval from ACC after submittal by the lot owner of a plan showing all landscaping and compliance with the above restrictions on irrigation. (b) The ACC shall exercise its best judgment to see that all improvements, construction, landscaping and alterations on the lands within the Subdivision conformand°harmonize with the natural surroundings and with existing structures as to external design, materials, color, setting, height, topography, grade, and finished ground elevation. The ACC shall protect the seclusion of each home site from other home sites insofar ,as possible. Approval shall mot be .unreasonably withheld ,and, shall be ,de ned automatically granted if no action is taken within thirty (30) days from the date a request is made by a lot owner for the approval of a proposal.. Any lot owner whose application has been denied or whose activity has been proscribed may appeal to the board of directors or ultimately to a majority vote of the voting members of the Association. No member of the ACC shall receive any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. (c) The ACC may grant a reasonable variance or adjustment of these .conditions and restrictions, in order to overcome practical difficulties and prevent unnecessary hardships arising by reason of the application of the restrictions contained herein. Such variances or adjustment shall be granted only in case the granting thereof shall not be materially detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements of the neighborhood and shall not defeat the general intent 'and purpose of these restrictions. (d) The ACC shall not be liable in- damages to any person or association submitting any architectural plans for approval, or to any owner or owners of lands by reason of any action, failure to act, approval, disappr.oval,,or failure to approve or disapprove, with regard to such architectural plans. -3- (e) The initial members of the ACC shall be Ann C. Robinson, A r it. majority of the ACC may. designate a rep of lotsrecorded- to act for the At any time the then record owners of the majoriaty dulyfl reinrte Subdivision shall have the power through of instrument to change the.. membership ofd saio aid of any member von . In the t the the death, resignation or inability ACC, the remaining members shall have full authority to designate a successor. 5. Resubdivision. No residential lot in RIFLECunless the RANCH SUBDIVISION shall ever be b i ided,_City of Rite subdivision is annexed to the municipality and thereafter meets the requirements and standards of said City. 6. General Restrictions on Residential Lots. Restrictions in addition to others set forth herein are as follows: (a) The site of all structures of all.kinds on each lot shall be approvedby the ACC using the crit riahe descr be in othese covenants, and shall not be erected above feet at the highest point. No structures of any sort on any lot shall be constructed closer than twenty-five feet '(25')'from any lot line. (c) No fences shall be constructed or maintained on any lot in the subdivision higher than four and fences one-halffeet connection but this restriction shall not apply to p with dwellings. All fences must wo d of maynbe utilized if brown -stained previous boards. Materials other thanthe ACC. permission therefor is given by shall not be allowed on ani lot (d) Wire fencing roads, whether public or boundaries bordering on community private. (e) No structure of a temporary character, trailer, mobile home, .basement, tent, shack, garage, barn -or other outbuilding- shall be Plalddn°nshall beusedasa as residence, new even construction; and no building though new construction, which has been completely prefabricated enants and built elsewhere, it being the naeresidenceof tonssaidv property prohibit the use of mobile homesas This covenant, .however, shall not prohibtr precute'homes which are partially constructed on the monthpropert 1Operiod of trailers durirq for no 'more than'a six (6) construction for storage of tools and materials °or for construction office. -4- (f)Each residential lot, as described in 1 hereof may have only one (1) habitable dwelling constructed thereon. This lin shall have at least 1500 square feet of finished a living area measured by area 9 outside dimensions, excluding carports; garages, attics, unfinished basements, utility and storage areas, porches and entrances. At least1500 square, feet of this area shall constitute rooms with two (2) sides or more above ground. ) fully (g) Each residence shall contain at least one (means of equipped bathroom and all sewage andleachshall fbeld e diorsposed other such system an individual septic tank.He�_th by a professional engineer licensed 6ar£ield theCountys 1of the Sdesignedroved by Departmentee of Colorado anopp thert and/or the Colorado State Health Department or other suchagencies having jurisdiction thereof. Evapotranspiration health shall not be permitted Evapotranspiration sewage disposal systems is unless at such time the Plan of Water Augam d to ionain amend d for such use. Each lot owner shall install e in good operating condition and shall allow the same to ftebe systempqualified persons at least once each y r. inspected by maintenance Copies of the results of each inspection bereportedto in r Health writing or replacement of such systemtwo (2) writing and provided to the ACC and the Garfield ,County Department. If inspections are not made at least every Health yepa -the .ACC or Garfield County years thereafter or if stem prior to the two of operating (2) year limitation oe an inspection findc such the system system inspected and (2) year limitation or find such system is not in good condition, the' lot owner shall have such notice. Upon, corrected within thirty (30) days(30)day failure of the lot owner to so act after them thirty an thecost notice period, the same shall be ' No lot shall be, used in anyyrmaf shall assessed e pu pose that would pollute nearby streams or manner or forany other sources, of, water. rooerty (h) No building shall be placed upon the P rte herein by means of other than new construction; itwb 1 not be dings purpose of this covenant to insureand t laced t old upon buil p perty in said moved from .previous locations Subdivision. the ACC. (i) Exterior lighting must be approved by permitted on any lot which (j) No structures shall be natural feet (30' )` in height from the highest ountation orf exceednthirty adjoining 'finished grade line immediately structure. No radio, short wave or television antenna over five feet (5') above the highest roof, line steal], be permitted unless approved by the ACC. ,(k) Clothes lines, equipment, garbage cans, service yards, wood piles or storage areas shall' be adequately screened by planting or construction to conceal the same from view of neighboring lots and streets. (1) No gas lines, light and power lines, telephone lines or television cables shall be permitted unless said lines are buried underground and at the o er,telephoneexpense. andThe television however, allow overhead light, power, linesif the same the cost of placing thesame ld not detrct oh punderground wouldpropeperty owners an be prohibitive. (m) The owner of any lot in said Subdiwithin visione shall complete construction of any structure thereon after commencement. (n) Every dwelling shall provide off-street parking, excluding garages or carports, for the regular use of at least four (4) vehicles. (o) No structures shall be placed or located on any lot in such a manner that will obstruct, divert'or.otherwise alter thee natural water drainage courses and patterns. Likewise, landscaping or changes to the existing terrain shall be made which shall obstruct, divert or otherwise alter such drainage. shall be graded such -that natural water or irrigation water overflow "is diverted from existing dr.ainage.or along other han existing topography. (p) The roof and exterior finish of all dwellings and outbuildings shall be of a natural color (earth tones only, consistent with the surrounding area. Doors and trim may ay be excluded from the effect of this subparagraph if approved the ACC, (q) No structures or large trees shall be placed or located on any lot in such manner lotthat owners will fo obstruct pu pbse gof ht onto the adjoining or adjacent utilizing the sun for solar energy. 7. Use Restrictions. There shall not be permitted or maintained upon any, that lot orr any part thereof, any trade, business or industry, except owners may rent or lease for residential purposes when not required for the owner's use. No oil, natural gas, mining, quarrying, or other similar development operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in the Subdivision, nor shall derricks, tanks, or other structures pertinent to these operations be permitted in the Subdivision. 8. Community Recreation Facilities. The acres of land designated "Common Area" shall be available for the private use of all Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision homeowners, including any future, residents on the lands adjacent to the Subdivision that may be developed by Ann C. Robinson or her successors, as part of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision. Riding trails, corrals, picnic tables and shelters, and other recreational facilities may be constructed on this, land upon approval of a majority of the residents, as defined above, prior to the time cf construction. 9. Animals. Owners and lessees of residential dwellings may have a reasonable nuMber of ordinary household pets, not kept or bred for commercial purposes, so long as such pets do not cause any annoyance to other owners. Owners and lessees may keep one (1) animal unit per lot owned or leased in the Subdivision. Additional animal units may be kept on their property for short periods of not more than ten (10) days if such animal units have permanent pasture elsewhere. Additionally, FFA or Four-H project livestock limited to one (1) animal unit per lot shall be allowed. The ACC may,.however, require any owner to remove any animals . if, in the opinion of the. ACC, lands are overgrazed or the animals cause annoyance to the owners of neighboring tracts. Family pets, other than dogs and cats, must be kept within an enclosed area which must,be kept clean, sanitary and reasonably free from refuse, insects and waste at all times. All animals must be so maintained that they do not become a nuisance to the neighborhood and do not run at large or endanger or harass other animals, including wildlife upon neighboring lands, and public domain. 10. Nuisances. No noxious or offensive conduct or activity shall be carried on upon any lot or in any structure thereon which may constitute a health hazard, nuisance or annoyance to the neighborhood. 11. Vehicle Registration. Motorcycles and snowmobiles may be utilized'for transportation in and out of'the.subdivision. 12. Signs. No billboards, signs, or other advertising devices of any nature shall be erected, placed, maintained or permitted upon the property in said Subdivision, provided that this restriction shall not be construed toprevent appropriate name and address. signs and signs that advertise. the. property, for sale or lease insofar as it is necessary to promote the sale and development of such property. 13. Private Roads. (a) Individual lot owners are responsible for the construction and maintenance of private roads on their lots. (b) Where any lot owner causes a private road or other structure to cross an existing irrigation system, said owner shall install a steel culvert not less than eighteen inches (18") in diameter in open ditches or a culvert of a.size,and type to match existing culverts. -7- 14. Outside Burning. The outside burning of any ti sh, rubbish or other, materials shall be absolutely prohibited. Standard and approved barbeques and fireplaces shall be allowed for the preparation of foodstuffs only. 15. Maintenance of Residential Lot. . No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish or storage area for junk or unused vehicles. All business-related materials, equipment and supplies shall at all times be kept in an enclosed area. The owner of any lot shall keep the structures thereon in good repair, doing such maintenance as may be required for this purpose. Each dwelling shall be equipped with a garbage disposal unit. Garbage cans must be contained in a covered area at all times. 16. Recreational Equipment and Vehicles. All trailers, detached campers, commerical vehicles or automobiles in disrepair shall not be parkedor maintained on any lot or on any street unless the same is within a covered garage or otherwise screened from view of other lots. Temporary parking of recreational vehicles will be allowed in regular course of use. 17. Wildlife. No hunting, shooting, trapping or otherwise killing or harming of wildlife, except coyotes, skunks, and porcupines, shall bepermitted in the Subdivision, it 'eing the intent hereof to conserve and protect all wildlife to the fullest extent possible. ACC shall set forth reasonable rules governing skunks, porcupines and coyotes. 18. Easements and Rights -of -Way. Easements and rights-of-way in perpetuity are hereby reserved for the erection, construction, maintenance' and operation of wires, cables, pipe, conduits and apparatus for the transmission of electrical current, telephone, television and radio lines and for the furnishing of water, gas, sewer service, or for the furnishing of other utility purposes, together with the right to enter for the .purpose of installing, maintaining and improving said utilities along, across, upon and through the lots within the subdivision being twenty feet (20') along the subdivision boundary lines and alor., Colorado State Highway No. 325, ten feet (10') on each side of the natural drainage courses; and thirty feet (30') on each side of the existing high water line mark along Rifle Creek, other such easements and right-of-ways as noted in„the final plat of the subdivision. Individual lot owners are responsible for the installation and maintenance of all lines from the respective tap points to the points of use. 19. Duration of Covenants. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties -an all persons claiming under them until June 1, 2005, at which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods -8- of twenty-five (25) years, unless by vote reflected by signed documents duly recorded by the majority of the then, owners , it is agreed to change said covenants in whole or in part. 20. Enforcement. Ifany lot owner or persons acting by, through or under him should violate or attempt to violate any of the covenants herein stated, it shall be lawful for the ACC, the Associationor any other person or persons owning—lots—in said Subdivision, to prosecute any suit in law or in equity to restrain and enjoin the violation of such covenants and to recover damages for such violations and to recover all costs" andattorney fees necessary to enforce the provisions of these covenants. 21. Severability. The invalidity ofany. one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. These covenants shall be in addition to, and not in substitution for, all applicable building, zoning and other governmental laws, ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations which shall be strictly followed and. adhered to in all respects. .Ann C. Robinson, Declarant STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged to before me this 27th day of December , 1982, by Ann C. Robinson, Declarant. My commission expires: August 31, 1983 Not)Y,7/4_ C— 2f6 ra y Pub c f 1091 Road 300, Parachute, Colorado 81635 Address "ADDITION TO BE INSERTED AFTER 2(d)1" NOTIFICATION: The domestic water providing water services to the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision contains a high sodium content in excess of the Colorado Department of Health standards; therefore, ,the.,lot owners and residences are hereby notified of the excessive sodium concent in the water system. It is also recomended that eacli' home •install a water conditioner to reduce the sodium content., -10- RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION First Filing FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT by: SOLAR COUNTRY P O. Box 163 Silt, CO 81652 (303) 876-2222 ATTACHMENT II Date: rr'.,e,J / 1982 By: Christine M. Lytle, PE. No. 19530 • • RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION, First Filing FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Table of Contents Introduction Existing Drainage Conditions Proposed Conditions • Methods Used Hydrology Hydraulics • Conclusion Calculations Appendix Bibliography Maps - Charts Exhibits - Correspondence 1 1 2 2 4 - 19 20 21 22 - 33 .34 - 38 RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION, FIRST FILING FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT INTRODUCTION: This report is an analysis of drainage conditions and design of drainage structures for the proposed RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION, First Filing, Garfield County, Colorado. RIFLE CREEK-RANCHSUBDIVISION (see Map Number 1) is• located in -the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, and 'contains 47 acres: The site is about 2.5 miles north of the City of Rifle and is,bordered by State Highway .325 and Rifle Creek on the east, Rifle Creek Estates on the south and west, public (BLM) land on the west, and private property on the north. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS: As mentioned above, Rifle Creek borders the easternmost edge of• the site. Two miles upstream (north) of the site is the Rifle Gap Reservoir and Dam which was designed and built,by the Bureau of Reclamation. The maximum design inflow to the Reservoir is 9,400 c.f.s. which produces a design discharge of 3645 c.f.s.; normal creek flow is 'limited to 325 c.f.s.. The only other significant'draina'geway on the site is a normally -dry creek which enters the property on the west, passes through an existing pond, crosses State Highway 325 by means of a 72 -inch CMC, and enters Rifle Creek near the southeast corner of the site. Incidental drainage includes four small areas which all'fldw in'an easterly direction. PROPOSED CONDITIONS: RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION will be developed as a single-family residential area with sixteen lots of two acres or more. As stated in the Protective Covenants for this subdivision, each lot will be limited to no more than 1,000 square feet of irrigated area and the native vegetation will be maintained beyond those irrigated areas. Three roads will be constructed within the subdivision. The total length of these roads is less than one mile. The surface will be an asphalt chip and seal mat. . 1 2 The existing pond on the site contains a large amount of sediment. The exi, ing embankment at the pond will be removed along with the sediment and vegetation„ within the pond itself. A new dam will be constructed such that the maximum high water depth at flood stage will be less than 10 feet, Due to the size of the lots along with the limitations on development of the lots and the relatively small amount of road to be built, runoff characteristics of the site will be essentially unchanged by development. METHODS USED: HYDROLOGY: Two methods of hydrologic analysis were used. The first, and simpler, of the two is the Rational Method. The Rational Method assumes that conditions throughout the drainage area are uniform. For that reason, it is most appropriately used for small drainage areas with one drainage way and little variation in soil „types or ground cover. This study used the Rational Method to analyze Drainage Areas Number 1A, 1B, 2, 3 and 4. As can be seen on Map Number 2 as well as within the calculations, all of these drainage areas are less than one square mile. The Soil Conservation Service Method of Hydrograph Generation was applied t the'analysis'of the largest drainage basin, Drainage Area'Number 5. -This basin is not only larger than the recommended upper limit for the Rational Method but is also a more complex basin and warrents a more detailed method of analysis. HYDRAULICS: Once the design flows has been determined, culverts were sized for the crossings by the proposed roads using the nomographs of the Bureau of Public Roads. These nomographs were also Used to analyze the existing 72 inch culvert under State Highway 325 and to design the discharge structure for the pond reconstruc- tion. Copies of the nomographs are included in the appendix. The channel relocation was designed using the Manning's Equation. The flood- plain along Rifle Creek was determined using this method also. Routing of the low hazard runoff flood through the proposed pond was done using the Puls Method as published in "Handbook of Applied Hydrology" by Ven Te Chow. 3 CONCLUSION: As shown within the accompanying calculations, all cross -road culverts are designed as 18" CMC. The only exception is the outlet structure for the pond in the Common Area of Block 1. This system will utilize four 36" CMC with headwalls. In designing.the outlet system for the pond,,the primary consideration was the conveyance ofthe total design runoff without exceeding' a'depthof ten feet. At the same time it is desirable to maintain a normal pool depth of four to five feet. Therefore the actual headwater depth to discharge the design flow rate is further limited to five or six feet. These restrictions led to selection of a series of small culverts as -the discharge structure. The flood plain along Rifle Creek does not extend very far beyond the high bank: of the creek. The limits shown on Map Number,3 were developed using a design flow rate of 5540 c.f.s.. .This value was used instead. pfthe 9400 c,f.s. shown in the preliminary analysis after additional research into the design data for Rifle Gap Reservoir was required in order to satisfy the Division of Water Resources regarding the maximum flow rate of Rifle Creek (see Exhibits). As additional protection from potential flooding, it is recommended that homes on those lots adjacent to Rifle Creek be built at an elevation equal to or above the 100 -year water surface. The following table shows the recommended building pad elevations: BLOCK LOT RECOMMENDED MIN. BLDG. PAD ELEVATION 2 2 3 4 5659.0 5664.0 5667.5 Minimum building pads are not considered necessary for Block 1, Lots 1, 2, 10, and 11 because, while these are adjacent to major drainage, all have building envelopes well above the maximum water surface. The drainageway flowing easterly along the south line of Block 2 will be rerouted to follow Creek Side Drive. This will allow for more buildable area on Lot 2 of Block 2, as well as provide more control of the drainage though that lot and decrease, the area flooded by Rifle Creek and the drainageway. aGe.,d 710/(15 .040 c 64 ` 6. �0 4/ 66 /o q¢ 14'4 . sE E ,ad?q ,s7J1 ') - 10...5OYZ,9416op e 0,10 /4! 3 a/6 ---/et" T-2)--5 IC/ Al 5// 7T &-a7 7-/ ) y • • = E -1(4-57--/A/(-7 L ,z2kiedz-12. 02 '7cp- /. Alh/, ( /L-5 • G. 6 - 7 -2.7 0- JZVZL (/ 7) 7' =244 6 Aciq 6,<)''041 11.x.1 /4„0 41 C a 4=2.c1d r i_7:_ _ oOA/Lam.-��/• 9L, 310ate. /J /, 2 O 25,x,3,-) /Akt-L ov 4z2,0 S2- rr � 7 ' - i it_-- _.<c,Li', 1:.,21--,'..,7 6 ,4---),-.., 4/ 1-,--:--z-N-11- -I; 1- - 4 (li hu) J 1 7 D.--- . - - /0 f//,r _Dt..5c A () 4t7(_) -Lo . /,::,_-:: .... . ..,. . . • 0 z z d 1 /2? -7 / _ -4,4-3 . . c.... j _5,4 /, c„, 0,45e„,,, ---..,...--,--, / 6 • (_'" 6-015 /i) /,---- . ' '56, " "8- a• _il, a. ' i• • /, a • 0, 0 67Z3-- • (40,_6,• '''''• ''6,-f '. __e_•;_-3 5. 45 - o-,&.(5 (i 7 :g7_ /,2 • Z 0.6 . - . 7,'4; • . 0, 7 751,1 ..• ,..._ .r_ Ly _-_-_--L i_7 , •oz,c) ,5',(:). c . D , o '2' i9 / 70 •- - i -•••• • ITS ' o •77Z :3.4 5...' __ 7 0 27,40 0,0/8 07.6 .., / i, /' 6 6, ,".,' •6._,_5_.L -ZS, 2 7_2,4 • 03.e ,40 .. . a-__, • --.2 0 6, oo9 0.004- - .. l_t3 Z 0 . • :/ L z_c),__c,__5 , 0, c) /, .5 . .o,'5', .,... __ifg5 -,.-0.. I.• /q�. 7 . . 7-70,2 . . ii.ixi , .,. , . z 0-76-6.5 7.5 / rc JL- -5- • rz: • - • 8 5)4- /7--/ , (Jr-LA.4 (a$ /// .. • . • • 013/___,) KJ---) (.7---) ' / o 7 47z- f ___. 7 / c— Kii /• )•..,.__-.7.) 're -[----;) ' cc .1._---;-5 (--i ,•--.). ' cr('_,,e. '' hi :-/..‘-) / G, -7,5 , ., . , /_7Q,7 _ --3„75 i... . _ . 2 ,?Z''. :-::11 •c(3.Z • • . • ._.-oe. 7' .. 70 /..(--7 .. .. . -70••4* /4 • . D 6„.7. c_2,._ 0 t4,',7 / 7•4(-3 • • . 0 .. . _P .. /6 . .o •4/.. 40 • ____-_-6-e),5- ATT7o / 0 6.71 -75. .• /i5 /1•0,37 c...35 _cf),;-71 L /D ./..q4 z d I • gZ . -2_'_s " /46 / 76 ' OZ -7___ " 54.75 .4_/,„,,6/ -/__02-,D Q. -77 / 0 a.___S 0.'-7'-5 (9..a_i '• 5-02.- o,afi. /-5-70,' 0' Z5,.q I t'l 520 3 , 5 lo <4 0 /Dc /55f, O.. 48 z 63.3 zop ' Ino? . . --j0-1.3--- 1,y " _._.1f .(j.'6,0 j• - , - , (Jr-LA.4 (a$ /// .. • . Ali -::_y__04 : 0 ' / o 7 47z- f ___. 7 / c— Kii /• )•..,.__-.7.) 're -[----;) ' cc .1._---;-5 (--i ,•--.). ' cr('_,,e. '' hi :-/..‘-) / G, -7,5 , ., . , /_7Q,7 _ --3„75 i... . _ . 2 ,?Z''. :-::11 •c(3.Z • • . • ._.-oe. 7' .. 70 /..(--7 .. .. . -70••4* /4 7, A5 •IgG. , . . „ ,, , 4.0 0 / 7. (; . . /0„.5 . „ , __ / . _461,-z••1 _ __, -.. / 76.10, t4,',7 / 7•4(-3 • • -/--2/ 4 -- r 11AL-_‘.a _1--, ---z2 !I -zo s -F- , Kt, - . ' n f----) (cp-- (r_i---;) rc_i ,-) 6 /=---5 ,o5.: _z__7. Lo 5 / (/* .5e, j10.. . 4_54Z2_. .,,,L5„, / / zG_ 7D �1---406n i.5fo. j 7 H 20 .77 ,J1oZ . t-1,_)_2_. 25 4_ 328- ' . 5./0 ___.o -76�o.55 !1 .8 40.8(0 --- - 60:0. e4, . , 20esg i, _fob ___41.7 -7c) •'' -------- --- - --- - -- _-- - � - - 5a0o. 7 ��q --L9-0-- -....`.:) . 6-1-1. '`.:) /Z 3 . ZGH -,-,,5_7(76.._ /7s 7 2 1,73 S _10 v /G 4 7 704. /6- / ,4 _ Jo t= r-__- .11 1 1.1■111 ::1:11:::::::_ ' 11'I1:1111111' ;IIIC111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i• II NMEM IIIIII .s • IV Injp A 4 .41 1 si mplini .1 -r- in1111611 mil cv Mill i iiiiiiiiiiiiiilibillilliiiir ' 41111 III= u pilippormillimiliiiiim - .. .. ... ..17.... . .. ... ::::..i...... .. ... ..... ..... IMAM IL mu us ) --- mum _ _u al til 0 • I MOM MN MN ......t. ... 11111 I. 111111111111111111 111111111111 um No 11 iv n II 11111111 1110 i � � M� III, IllPiIIIiiIIIIflhIIIiiIIliIi!IIIIIIIIIHhIHhIIIIIIIIIOIIII; In IIIIIIiiiiiiiiii iiiigiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii11111111W InnummilmilinlisillukiammillimmilimmillimmilIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIMISINIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIIIIIII""° AIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 1 II Illinnianommissimellimillilli111111111111111 I 11111111111111111111W181111111 1MMIIMMUMMINIM MEM -10. -4 ■ 1,11111 I,fiY IJ% I �■ 1110 III h. 111111111111111 n �a aM N1 11111 1 ■■1■■■■ ■ ■■ ■1111 e1p■■ ■■■ _�_ -} EP.!ilIIJ:iI PP i Eii ■ no mini mom • mum ii !ir'-umm - t n1 •f III■■■ ■■■1 ppm! ImrlmnoPm ■■■■■■� ■■■■■ � �--• :--- -- -; - - ' _1 , � � _!I'1i!111 ■■■ = ! .i-, , IC■ ■ ■Y■■■■1 ■■1■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■'■■C ■ 11 11!1111! ..■11� 1111■■. _.. ... ■■/�� ` 1111■I• SCJ 1111 t■ 1111■ „ • • //,dr, = 6 • g,6 ro-,10,7/.94 /7 _ _LW ze3 /1(3 • • /8 ' ••4' • — 7- , 6 4- /. 5 -PI: • 2/1,1,ZCI T.).2 76.0 AC ) /7) 12 / A (?01/ire4.Z--, (16:40•117/.-4=1 - /25 // 0.-/c. 3 r? o D y_-/Diej-__04/2Ja,"/J Eciv,1 p- F--- yr v�..<-1Q1.62o,e. (CA).)- 7-c¢ _,// <501/ o A%o1-.-- A -/6 /--/ 6/1:4'D__L.: %a cib 5:) • .i /41; /7 i'- b P-- 4%/Tl/DD /e7X-ZI S CE 6 gnat 6-1 . /A144- //.(.1 (A_!) 4ui ()Al) /') -Z/ z3 6. 7 7 /ls 7 a G, 17 o,J7 o.Z-7• . _/ 3 -3 f r. 50 ____ ' 4.6 Eciv,1 p- F--- yr v�..<-1Q1.62o,e. (CA).)- 7-c¢ _,// <501/ o A%o1-.-- A -/6 /--/ 6/1:4'D__L.: %a cib 5:) • a, 38 41 1 77-46- 5-6,250 O. 6 5.,cle5 V z .-fes 6T 'o (0, G.)10,___6. 5') /0 6 Z, --7Yo;-5;) :-:�/ /'7'17 ////:1-\ _..-. (`7i / 4P1-7--(- :I (/-/. x�,F, N i(1 1 �`, /k (/A/ ,: '„�'- -1 �qe(I (Vr;7/1, (iill; 0 -- ),2// — 7 c�.7 -� 7 J _._. c..<4- ! ... ,,, C. Z_ G. . f . o O.O -0. G O.-1 p:s.J -,--- -- - -- / z' —`!e7V ,(2_,Lir 60_ .--._.. _.------- -.,-.LA.-.aZ ---• a, 38 41 1 77-46- 5-6,250 O. 6 5.,cle5 V z .-fes 6T 'o (0, G.)10,___6. 5') /0 6 Z, --7Yo;-5;) :-:�/ /'7'17 14 /id/A/Ei/ � /471/oe6ci.el Ad ad P /4 e 1 Ah( -10,- • • i,6/ Lk/4)/ D,6es/9,ki aid,d4eci 32 ops. 140 �r-5--- = E34 ,G/it &---- 1 41,de" U �1,1T/O� CQ u,erioiti _ %x/,6 ,4 �/3 2 ( r) /.ale: (/,,J) Le_57%-7.- . kaig,ya-,/r�L-/D,&: „,e,40.z/3 C &,cJOp-F 5 /,v / (P —s 4 /Al - (44) ,��,0 i /de) ,tiao 0,e) o. el o. eGooe 3 a o; , - 31 G.o 0.e il- f,_ _ 0- `7-': o-7 / 6 d 0.7'i o a7 /6-/ 4(9/5 0. -tea :o/_ /07 /, 4-o 0. l' " /046 0, A 2(d 2/Z /471/oe6ci.el Ad ad P /4 e 1 Ah( -10,- • • i,6/ Lk/4)/ D,6es/9,ki aid,d4eci 32 ops. 140 �r-5--- = E34 ,G/it &---- 1 41,de" U �1,1T/O� CQ u,erioiti _ %x/,6 ,4 �/3 2 ( r) Le_57%-7.- . Ii( r Le- - r /c9dr d . / / o.oao 0.040 4-'/ /'/ o.O.3o 0.04 9 /6-/ 8,/ 0,045 ;. 0-o4-5 /'5. ,' / ./ 0, o.90 a. e&O fin, 1i 'TD - / .--PP`-- i 7 ado ► 7rtyp`, S79/177 --, r��' /`off ---moi fy,_.L 10 O/ Y- /77177 o oyo, o -- p`/`'-7-7/o l dc- iY, %x r770 7qryq - - /`'70 V _ . of •��� d�d�. `�' �' � (42, VA/09 PI Q-4• . 17/y0 /yo .c/77od/ QD oma..c-/ /r71"/"117`-��'7/7V V -717G o sco ,J --- �o k...47,voP • c' c7r0's,1-1/2'0-2 21.0 CZ, /o/ of 0" -.7,77c• % [YKJ7 'ST � Y OP II t L.1 1I 1 .I 1 1L1IJL 1 LLLL111 Ii_ ,; _;_1_ 1. !__ I_ 1 I d'� rte•,_-r�--t�-TTS-�"` CP 11V1151 • 1 1 r t -_ T- -- la� I mm ■�; i■ NNW II 1 110 1111111111111111111 ■■■ II II N■■■EMUM EH=� 1111111111111111111 1111111111 811111 ■■ mmIII �IIIIIIE ��■_ III■■M■■Ii 17 z/a� 1 dkJi-S -i c77 2, I do q4 2 32 too 3_ -. �t3 6o.3- 66, 3 6I) 4I,iii , .r4 (0a.eA.IA11.5. I/ 0,1e d,�. iA — 12 AI4N Z.E i ,i , dr 330 / 3 a.c g 7 _ 4,11/Ca�r,�.4,Acr- -3. .9/o ' . 8_ a.0¢ _ Yjj j l it ,& IJ7 L i/i� X9_-90 - 870 i/5 /go __ , 2 O.Gr 9? 2 67,0`1 (5.5 �Q z/ .37,E3,1__ ____ Ii o _4...4 - o eoa __6_3_ _coo us_ n ed�- _tea_ -_Q 4 T. oma- _ -_0L4 4d- =04¢ � ea i/,_ iLc0 lig4_, 5067 -- 30& / 22._ =fa.3 7923 - X092 ____.2_ .-44,0 %l29/ _8.79'5_ 4/_70 dkJi-S -i c77 2, I do q4 2 32 too 3_ -. �t3 6o.3- 66, 3 ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■.■■■.■ ■■ •••••• momma ::: mmum:::: '1mmum: •::1■.::41:: umm a mom •:■:r -mamma' . 8 ■■..■..■...■.....■..gym■■■■■.■ I■■■■■■■IAMME■■■MENV.■■.. IIMM.W....■■..� ■.■■■.■■■.■■■■■■.■■■■■■.■■■■■L.../■1■..■■■■■■■■■■■.■..■■■■ A■■.�'.■■■..1 If ■.■■1■■■M■.■■■.■■■.■■■■■.■■■ ■ ■■■.■■■■ ■■■■■■■.■■■.■■.E ■.■ m■■■.u■ ■■...■■■.. ■.■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■..iu.■■■■.■:■■■■M■■.■■■■■■■■■■■.■.■.■■■■M■ LeIi D. ■■..1■ ■■■■■■■■■ 1111■■H■ 0,■■1■■■1■■■■■■■.■■.■■■■!■■■.■■ ••••• 1.1.11 ::::::uiIMII•u••1I:::•u�u�•u.i..0....u..u•u •uugIu....uu.......u..• ::::::•• m::_:�;:-�u..u••••••....EE••••••. •BE:EEm......•••:••■'••■■■.■ •. '.rr .0 .■■■■■■■:■ ; .■.■■.■.■�.�,..■.■O . . ■1111 .uuuuuuuu...•u••u OMEMOMMOMEMMu•uu OMMOMM•uu•u MEMMOMMOI l: EM Ems .■■.■■■■.■.■.■■■■■■■■■■'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■■■■1■ ■■■■■■■■.■■■1■■.■■..uu■■■■.■■. u•..u1: ':1:::E:::a'�, IMMOMM:......::::::.a.... .u... MOMOMOMMOMMO111 ■■1;MM .■.■■■■I.EE■..■■. .S� ■.. M■■■■■■■.1■.■..■■■E .M■■5■■■1■.■..■■■■:MEMO■. ■■.■...■......■.EE:.■ ■■:■E..MM.1■......■■.■.■ ■■■■■■■■..■■■.■.■....■uuu ..■■ ONMEMOMMOOMs.■1>c ■■ ■i •■ ■ ■ ' .■■ ■•m••u ■•.•� ::••••••••• u••':::: a••••••••••u: ••••••••uudiv■u.uu •� ems '::: �OMMum =MOM = ''WOMM M•■. E. rommoquommumEnmwmummummimmum;;;;;mumm■.........■iii■■■.:E•.•■%•■•:EiEEE... . ................. '■■■.■■■■■ 1111■ • ::�.■■ _ ;:::a•.l.u. l.. •l••.u:::'::::i:::::n ' �1 ■ 1111■■■■�■�■ 1111. ■■. •••••.::■■1 ■room EU:: :: ■ :•:::E •■E:E �::E Sl••UU::�:::� ::: �' :u ■■■.■■■■ E■■ ■ I MEMO■■ R...■■■■■_ ■■■■1!■■■111 :■■■ ; III ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■ mum \■■■■■■■■f/ ■■■■■■■■■■.' u■■ �- ■■ MEMEMMO ::1'■■_ �e■■ ■■I Mari 5■■■OMI■■■■.■■■. ■■■■■■■■■.■mom■■■■ .■1 u_ 111 ... -- - ■........... ....■...........'�.. — M■■ ■■■■■■■M■ ■■■■?_t lir ■■OMMMEEMMO MEMO M ME MO w ■1■■■■■. ■ ■■M■■■1■■■M■■■■� u •1I OMMOOM• ammommimummummp mg Ems 1111 •• Y1111111111111114 I.I.U.U..I UU:;:1 1111111111111111145II ■■■■:u ■11 • • :::::1 1■■5■�.■.. ■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■I1 _ ..■ 1111. ..■ 1111.* •:.�■:E;.■.� i:■■.■■■■ •■•■i'■MMOOMM.w•••.MOMO _ ;� ...��.■ ■.■ . ■.. ■uu■ ■.■.■■■■.pq•.E: a 1::■iMl: t■•"•••'•mm:OMOMM ■MOMMMO■MEM �•■■■■■■■ ��EiINIiiEIflLi1.■.■■■■.1.■■■ice■■►���■■■■■■■■.■■■■.1■■ N■.1u■■...11. ■11■M■■■_f.t S■;;_ -';i! 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111VAIMMIIIII1111..1■■■■■.. '�111: :::::UlUI1lU•l1lllU1l:..� 11■ ■■■■EM■�_.i_ 0IMMO= rd M5■ iiI..lm..I.ulu..lU.lI.IIIIi ■■■■■ a•uME mommommummommuommummmum . AN MMEMMEMEMMINOMMEMMEmmimM Mom 1111 1111 ;1U■MM ■■ 11EM :11:M MOM OMEMO•E OMMEMii:" 1111 NM :51 ;M■■ MEM :•■ ■E■ OM :•:: ■1■■ ;M■. ::::1 ::■1■ MOM ■■.■ ■■ 1111 .. IMM IIM MO ■■■■■ MOM MO • 1111' MI 141 IM MEM BEM 11 die OMR PINERIPPI Mr, !IIHIIIIIvg::uiiII I ■ ■ ■O■■■■5■■.■►' 11151111E lIlIlI1■1111 E ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■1■■■■■u._:--� 111E■O■. ■■■.■■■.0 .■■■■■■M :.■M■■5515;■ E- , ``` M■■■■. ■.■■M■MM■■■1■ ■ ='`� ■■■■■:■ ■■■.■■■■■1■■ 111 MIME■■■■■■■■■�� ■■■■■■■ ■■1111■;1 ■ ■■ ■ ■■5•••I ■■■■■■1■■■. M■■ ■■■■■ ■...■■■; ■ ..:■.M ■ 111.1■M ■ 1M=•5111::■•■iii 1111■■: ■■■u ; ■ 1111 ■■■■■■.: ■..■■■1.I%Mu■ ■■■■■■■■w ■■■■.■■■■■'� ■■u■. I■■■■■■■.;■■■..;■■; ■��` f•■a■■■■ 1:::::O MMOMM:E:II IOMMEmm i 1111■■■■■■■■■■■■..■1115■■■M •I••I•IUIUUIU•••UU:::•;; OMM 111111::::::1::::.:P,.MM" ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ru■uu ■■■■■■■■ ■■■.■■■■ +►�� :IUUUUU■'UE1■•51•••:•■iiia' ■•'■'■.•p ■ ■■■■.■ ■■ ■■.■■■■■■■■■■.■ ■.■■■■■■.;;5511■■■■■■.;■1151 1151■■■. •■■■■■■■■■■M ■■■■■ ■■■■■..■ ■■M■■■■■.■.■..■u5 ■■■■■■■ ■E ■■EE■■■■..■ ■■■• :11::::3:11111111: ::::: E 1115■. n■■■■■■■ ■ •■ ■■.■ 1111■■■■;;1111.;..:...:.... .■■■■.■■ ■■■■ ■■.■■ .■■■■■ 1117.11:111t1111711111111: : • ,:r. -- MOM B .! ME MO :' 55 IMO EMOMMOMMM1::U::1MM ■ 1115 i L :• : - ; 1111■ 55■555 ; 111 ■■.■■■■■ ■■■c ■■■■■■■■1■■....■■■■ , L, T = aaaaom EIa■aaa:. aal ommomo aaa :aaaaamom mo mom• U mommo om mommommom m r lAJ ■: = - ■■..■■■■■ ■■■■■■w■■.■■.■■■■.m, ■■■..■■■■■■■■1■■■.! ■■1■■■■.I ■.■■■■m..■. /'� ■N ■■..M...m;■■■■■■g Ent■.0.....*1�,�,r■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■ 4 `i1■■.■t ,1 \■■■■■■■m� 11.- __ 7■■.■■■■ cmoo■■. .' m■■.■■■■s .■ ■..m■.■■■. ■■.1 ' `�■■■■■mqe ■a�l.■■■.1N E _ ! %� • -■■■■■momoroommomo `�■■■■■■■■ILU■a■■■■■■■■■■I■■■■ 'mummo■■o\ ..■■■■■. N� .■■■■...1►'. moor. ■ ■■■■■■ ►q ■■.■■■■■■ ■. L■. I ` .�.■..■. ..■■.■.. am ■ .■.■■■■..,:..■■■ k RAmoom■■aan ommo■■■o■aa■■■1■■■m _ a■■■■■�■■u■■■■■■.■. -:■■ - ■a■■■■■■moa■■■.i� ■ ■■■■■■■■,o■.■■■1■■■■■..■1■.■■ ■■■■■■1mm■s■■m mum mum 1 - _...0■■..■■■■■■.3■aaa ..■.■■■■■■■ ■.■■■ ■■■■1■■■ i■■. ■■.'i�l.■■■1i■■■.m ■■ ■■■.mommmmm■■■■ ■■■ao■■■■.■■■■■a■■■■■ao■■■■o■ r�■. ■1■■S�■■■■o■■■.■ 11.■ _...1...111■. 110..1■■1■!IE.. mom ....I &.....L.uu..u...uI.u.ILiaaiiiuiii■iiaiiii ►: Liiiioi■i •uuiaian■■■i■uu■aa■ ■�� ■■ ■/■■■■E iEiaaiiiaaaMiaa:iaaai■aiislaaiaas a iii■ linaiir� aa■:aE ::aa.::iE.:_ ■.. ■■m ■■■■■ .� ■■■■ i■■■, mmomm ■■■■■■■■■■.■a■■■■■■■■m■.■■ ■■■■■ ■ •■.iola■■■■ moom■■■■■■■■■■N — ■..■ ■■■■ ■11■■■.. momm..■■■ .■■■■■■■■■.■■■. ■■.■■ .■■..m�►l ■■ .■Immo.■ N■■.■■ ■■■■ i■.■ loommoommommommommommommommo ■.■■1 ■■I■■■■■■�.■m ■.■■■■.■a■m■■■■■om ■■■■ =■■■Ir■■■■■■■■■.■.■■■..a■a■■■■■■■■■ ■1■■■m ■ �■■■.■■■R 'IMM■■■m.■■■■■■■■NN- ■.■ ■■■ monam■■■■■■■m■■■■■. .■■■■■■■■ ■■■.■� ■� ■■.■■1■w iamomm■.■.■N!!■■■N■■■ ■w.■ M■w■Iu 1t`w/.aU■■■ww■■www■■MIIMMw■w■■■w■■ w■■■•U ■ I■■w■■w■1 w\Sw■■ww■1EMI1■■■N1■ INIMMOI 11 1110•1111•100 ME ilii =aiillllt mmumm"Si■OMIMI a..PI ..U.I. ••l..0 •l•• aaaaal ^f aaaa� aa11 i&Ell Nam ,o■■A n ■- moosmo I�antIM■.6..a s ■■■■■1 �y ■■■■■■■■.■ AU L•1■■■NN■■■a=■- MIME=lingll:E:'s u Rra 11111 EE EEEE■a:■■:. IU•IUI Ua:a: 20 • ___42r2�I5 -Zoz5,461- �/4�4�� �r-.� /6:0/A/7-- .1/4 /7) Low/ L ,earl© = /-95- 23-) -9523-) .7ui-t"D Av.-1.//v G� zoo 20 gam/ /. > /6"a • l — St -a s "i77.0 Tv 9,..1,514 i • 3 a/A/ o _ moo_ 9 - -=-x.85 �� 1_-���r2 E gl) c 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY Handbook of Applied Hydrology, Ven Te Chow, McGraw-Hill, 1964 Design of Small Dams, U.S. Department of. the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation,, 1974. Hydraulic Design of Improved Inlets for Culverts, U.S. Department of Transpr-ta- tion, Federal Highway Administration, 1972. 50 Ip• 4 r• 4 6 ro nr 1 5 6 uY 22 DESIGN OF SMALL DAMS ...1111 �� rovempar4teramm liketaYoriEwomil %drat -CA _Bur w,:• ---,'"1--s410 ipiblifb Pordialiptiop ratIrrir 149.011 kibailiiiii N.A.T111,17A. 111 M41-1-bik bell ititianggr %%11 anntallEABWri pa* isito,v 411 ;pall 40 1 1 triliSI ZONE 8 114drillTe- � 111 ` IIJ2w `, MIg iniri �����11111rarialiallir* / willWA trlut IIMAIIIILak �� 1' __ _ .moo. ill) liti--wmilei 41041110 .:., A:Maul§ --1-4--•%..- •Idommuinth .„. ompratt ...... hiair, ,�� 1 �■im Y V figure 17. Probable maximum 6 -hour point values In inches for general -type storms west of'Ih• 105' meridian. 288—D-2756, 288—D -27S7 '99LZ0-88Z '59LL-0-88Z 'V644Z—(1-88Z 'uolpiiaw ,SOI to ;soM ODA Joh )goid turiwptota uoy; ssol poo u6lsap mogul 8uundwo3 /o) algo)liddo 1oploJ adAi-loioua8 moy-q BululwJolap Jo; ollod •gL unfid Jagwnu pajooipui Aq sanion wJo4s ad4. IoJaua6 wnwixow a1gogoJd apinio :aloN 0021 0501 0011 iz Flood Studies 24 4. y; I w lip ore "ii .. c ,4;‘,ir A 4r 1110161111.4* IA 111 /•,t !� ayeipliwalli . ,>�AN111,1110111111• 1"4074111414111 110 ,/1 i► . I', ONE �0A. INC • SIDE OF INCH IS• �� �' � AtAPEPARbeetiritusi;i .4)4014, p„...a.......val Ilp s. t 'low Admanizeugwvo ,..,ikva Airiamwootea 4011ftiratiostil -- :%rspiplivAi...i. J awswhilli r : -- .-e TIMIPPIPOIVASSA .% 141:111.1 __1171116111111011MM WILI r,„ ms, moidridln w114 1111.111 .,0 figure 20. Proboble maximum ,hunderelorm 1•hour rainfall (point values In Inches for area west of 105• meridian. 288—D-2760, 288—D-2761. 58 IP ,q... IVO neo• . 5 / ' '' itormitytikist II •. I mairovAl..w-itimitemt,i IrrJi, r, _In • �x.11 1 ti, Er, f411119 14111iw*ili I L p, • ,4 /Ammo mity mg ,.....mailinik , , "144," mikkomirop-vial .4 fonii„., h ,, .. AI low mi miniftlion NIP" IIIRIMin irrin il all ' v - 'RYAN ailiwilliMil imitin • „ _ 10 IT nrillip lk vorti*A •1010Al eaPitip Wavirepre*ZIL I 4 IP�' �►�riimasp siouL. sii Mffermiftlibtaii MlarafrilmilrgMall r e''',7--; ____Mffillielligt .rr��l e tt/� 1 ' //AMIN 111, WEI 162141/.11111 NOTE DIVIDE PROBABLE MAXIMUM THUNDERSTOR4411 � iiPIWO" VALUES BY INDICATED NUMBERIM. in• iia. 25 DESIGN OF SMALL DAM ,0• ,,.»,"'. Of 10.4.1111 1.1. oa• Figure 24. , Ratio for determining 1•hour thunderstorm rainfall applicable for computing inflow design flood loss than maximum Kabob for area west of 105' meridian. 288—D-2767, 288—D-2768. RATIOAREA RAINFALL / POINT RAINFALL 1.00• .96 .92 .88 .84 .80 76 72 .68 .64 .60 56 1 ?6 Z ON E C ZO4E B ZONE A 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 AREA IN SQUARE MILES Figure 19. General storm: ,conversion ratio from 6 -hour point rainfall to 6 -hour area rainfall for area west of 105' ! idian. 288—D-2759. 700 B00 900 1000 54 1.00 .11 ,.2 ... J ..♦ l 2 a ..0 .14 J .72 a a .64 a 0 i7 .40 a .16 ..2 .4. DESIGN OF SMALL DAMS ^ O N CP AREA LIMIT ZONE II ZONE AREA LIMIT ZONE I .4° L 0 50 100 150 200 250 500 330 AREA IN SOUARE MILES figure 21. Thunderstorm! conversion ratio from 1 -hour point rainfall to 1 -hour area rainfall for area west of 105° meridian. 288—D-2762. •So i 52 TABLE 1. -Constants for extending 6 -hour general -type design storm values west of 105° meridian to longer duration periods 1 Duration (hours) 2 Constants Zone A Zone B Zone C 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 30 36 42 48 GO 72 1.20 1.39 1.58 1.76 1.93 2.10 2.26 2.42 2.57 2.95 3.26 3.55 3.79 4.14 4.34 27 DESIGN OF SMALL DAMS TABLE 2. Probable maximum thunderstorm point rain- fall in inches for various durations based on percent- age of 1 -hour rainfall values from figure 20 Duration (minutes) Zones I and III (percent of 1 -hour value) Zone II ' (percent of 1 -hour value) 15 1.18 1.14 30 1.36 1.26 45 1.53 1.36 60 1.66 1.43 75 1.77 1.50 90 1.87 1.57 105 1.95 1.64 120 2.03 1.71 135 2.10 1.78 150 2.28 1.97 165 2.38 2.15 180 2,,40 2.25 2.41 2.28 1 Multiply 6 -hour point rainfall from figure 17 by indicated constant. r For durations shorter than 6 hours, the time distribution of storm values can be obtained from the appropriate curve presented on figure 18. TABLE A -8. -Design thunderstorm precipitation time - sequence in 15 -minute intervals Time, hour Order of magnitude Zones I and III Zone I1 0.0 0.25 50 .75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 0 4 3 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 '12 0 3 2 1 '4 ' Duration limit of sone rainfall. 48 71 88 100 110 117 122 126 129 . 131.5 133 "134 48 71 88 100 1 Zones are outlined on figure 20. 544 TABLE A-9.—Design thunderstorm precipitation direct runoff curve number Thunderstorm cover index CN for sone and type flood Cover type Tree, including understory Cover density et ground surface, percent More than 50 50 or less Zone I Zone II Zone III Type of flood Type of flood IDF A B ss IDF A B 4 1 4 Type of flood IDF A B 4 s s 70 78 85 70 78 85 70 78 85 75 89 91 75 82 88 75 83 91 Brush, sage, grass or combinations More than 50 50 or lees 75 82 88 80 88 91 70 79 88 80 88 91 85 90 94 75 85 94 t IDF—inflow design flood, probable maximum thunderstorm ralnfalL t A thunderstorm—Flood for assumption A. a B thunderstorm—Flood .for assumption B, ' Underntory can be defined as a layer of foliage. in a forest, below the level of the main canopy; or the trees forming such a layer. 28 DESIGN, OF SMALL DAMS TABLE A -10. --Minimum 15 -minute retention lois rays Hydrologic A B C D Minimum los rate, inch per 15 mints -. 0.10 0.06 0.0{. asa s. 404 ■■ ■ ni WN■■•3 ' OE nYV:N so3■• Rainfall (P)uu ■3■ uuas"nuasN• u•■N l. - UM: 1/411••••111!WO: IRunoff (Q)i'"n"'3 � Y•nn u3■u.N■..... 1 mm man ■A 6 3NNa3■iNu::NW Y'n33 a .6..WOO .......,'.11 •1111._ ' NP ......-4-... ..r.■Y 3.3. NYN.....a ..Y• riimmara ..•VI■■YYINY■.r. _-- Rats - �� % i' NN • •N r• pP_I■•.••IN.•o9 .a r:..■ Infiltration curve ••■■■3■ a ■vena N•I• ; WWII WOW �p • .• r •n••I • WA nrA•n•nr. :.. . • ' L•a.■ SC •Y■zmumuur ■ •v"u3 •lm NnN•.NN '• • •/•■•NNrn■ 333:: nni ..n...:' ■••P.Y::r.:Y•33a33.a1:3 intiC: nte•M aA"MILI:' C: o 6 Initials _H .... as■•■•Y NNN •s!•■■vYYPI■n / Y■•m"vI A■•■o'.■■■Y m a ;abstraction I, se Time,„vireo Nese 3' ■ ■ Al 'y” /�•N■�i'•� ,uiii""'"ii33■"■3■i' W •nem i - Y ■ LL•" ..■.■3.■■n■ne ■3• aim on •• •A'•."IIO ■I.•N•/Alt JN•••IA•r•■■I iiiii. :•••n•/.n Mn.NVIM• AWMUMWAUNII V , •••Y•••• ••N•3 ■■e■ 11E11111U :1111■r:11111:111111 11111 �■■n���i1■■VA••■■■Y 111111 S = �P_, I e:len3:11n1:i11n1:111nIJ1n�U.WH1111rd11n111 Q. P -40+S 111111111111111111/11rOPAIMINIMMINNIIIIIlii!!!!lilllNliNIIill 1111111hi! With P 2Iai S 2Ia+Gi •.�.�...!��c!��v•■r P•.n ■ ..ii■•••Yr.■■■n■•■ s n.i•ai'ii'iL' •1P ■ s33 as'.u"u. ■p1■as■sn•■ .. i; and G • P-10 -Q. -•Nr r m ■/InMWrd. •N•.N•Nn"r. ■Y ■ er.:N•r,•••YA••V.In ••■IA••■■■Y•KI• ► 4 ■ V ■ ■I' rrar'. A Y/I■.■■■YL:■ ■I■Y•.■YN■N•/�N■ : Curves on this ■�■ n i • :i vA 1 ■■■••, pr`■ !,, ! ....• ,! ! A■Y It T sheet ore for the case, i � l sItlD�ilil�' 1iR di11�3fl�Mlrii,n!/in:n�l:::i .. •mn•v iiGv ■r i• in PPa .•mr u n••s •a"NNN :. ••"NN 2 ^lo• 0.25, so flat 'N••• N• u..r r.N n •N•••• • •Y' •: ■33Nr NA rn• ni ,. ••'ii° ■ AI. I mN•Y rI:•u.■ g i 3 •I••Y•u••ir� tl 4NY'I■W■.a•Y••rd•••.'.t7..i•••N•rA"•■■■M/i■Y"Y�/i••• ••••%/511 .•I■W.rpY•"••i .n WAS "•••Im•OM Al •.Y JY•■N••N:■•••■ I. 3 ▪ ... QZ(P-0.2S) 33riY"I.■.i.■■�/'/Ir ■■��/•■•�Y Y••■I�Y'3rq�3 ••1�P•�N■lq♦)'r:1 LN■■N■O■N:•FA••••• tJ P+0.85 ■r..■■33:■ •.r .•. •e i.■•■r:. ■ .11. • �.■•■■t•C/.Ii . •••■• ....1• a -- 1 :• ' 33333::MIC,:Y•�i':. I/ `•G3..■../H :;: %MI33.::9•C9'/.3Y 3' : 3Y■ :_'.::.3 O - 1► La11•• r ■ 1 • A•••3�►.In ■ .• ■ Y s N••NNN p�■■■agaa�■•■aa■a.YYas■aannY��rtVV�■••■■�aa�V■■Y/1•a• N/ A . ,'I. • •Ja•N ■��■IY■•a•/.tBr ,■•■■••/•I■"•"/■■W■-nt.N■■N■•N•n■!.• }�YYN■■■O■••YY� .fpr •p�ry'-�:�W_I �.AY•••■•■el■■/�. 1►,.•■•Y■NPJN■■■YfWif•••■•N F�.�.' MN /■■•MI•M►MOS WMM.••N■fir ••,•R :YY ■■Y N •M•••••Y r � - a�- O.W31.g.i3NSI/:■:•••■■I--.:nN ■��U.... ■: AM" - r• .•.3.■ S' I:OY•r .. n.. :::' .... APPr '� naG ■ .rrlN . r• }T a .N • �Vi�i�■ a •' Y. •■••■/ .'•/ .. •• on MMMMM WOW riFir�► P' I I" e' e W 3 !� e' 1 IC Ow y. .-. . •.p .•.. .•••-:■•■• Ow- 2- am enns.snan It 1 ■'� sl�r.-■ ■■IY i! • ■•ad:■ • /per � Ems■-.-'a::.'ri:a'�" 2 3 4 5 6 7 RAINFALL (P) IN INCHES 1;3 '::ill: ■i'■.N•em:•niiN•■ sNN•No__�.oiii 8 9 10 11 12 P'0 to 12 inches n.n •e 9 inrh.a Figure A-1.IP-0.2S)t Solution of runoff equation, 0= (Sheet 1 of 2.) (U.S. Soil Conservation Service.) 288-D-2549. P+0.85 Chart 12 DIAMETER OF CULVERT (D) IN INCHES STANDARD C.M. 180 168 156 144 132 120 108 96 84 72 60 54 48 42 / 0 STRUCTURAL 10,000 8,000 EXAMPLE 6,000 D• 36 Inches (3,0 feat) 5,000 0/14• 66 cfs 4,000 H f 3,000 (feet) (1) 1.8 5.4 (2) 2.1 6.3 (3) 2.2 6.6 e0 In feet 2,000 1,000 800 600 500 400 (1) 0 300 u.r- U / _ 3 200 Q��� N reZ ./ w / a w w 100 / 4 ix 310 0 a _-•60 N 50 1-- a 40 w 0 30 IAf SCALE ENTRANCE w D TYPE t -- a 20(1) Headwall 3 0 (2) Mitered to conform W to slope = 10 (3) Projecting 36 33 30 27 -r -n 24 21 18 15 12 8 6 5 To use stole (2) or (3) project 4 horizontally to scale (1), then uss straight inclined line through 3 0 and 0 scales, or rerrrrr os illustrated., 2 1.0 FEDERAL HIGHWAY 'rThNISTRATION ? nY t!? 13-76 — 4. r— 3. — 1.5 — 1.0 1.5 — 1.0 — .7 — .6 — .7 — .6 .5 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR C. M. PIPE CULVEL.TS WITH INLET CONTROL - 2000 0 2 a Q 0 N O 0 2 — 1000 CC 1- -800 - 600 -- 500 - 400 -300 - 200 7100 80 - 60 - 50 f/f W x 0 z z 0 40 re 0.3 5 W 1— W 4 - 30 - 20 I'0 -8 -6 -5 - 4 -3 2 0 -120 • -108 -96 - 84 -72 -66 - 60 - 54 -48. -42 -36 - 33 - 3 0/ Z.1 27 -24 — 21 - 18 -15 -I2 BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS JAN. IM z3 HW Chart 3 H hp \�oT \\N - Slope Sp �/l�[711 SUBMERGED OUTLET CULVERT FLAWING FULL HWo H + h0 + El. Outlet Invert 0•4) J 0 'J 0• 9 \00 C>. w / LL l `,O '� Z \00 F� x x•`20 0O O X -.4 EXAMPLE 1 - f, 7 0 500 .300 N.7.5 400 -.5 -.6 —.8 - LO - 2 3 -4 - 5 -6 500 8 -10 - 20 HEAD FOR STANDARD C. M. PIPE CULVERTS FLOWING FULL n=0.024 30 13 19 r %1 23 .. • - 30 .29 \26 V ITp1� l EM II 16337 /I 31� I �Z2HOG2ACK % iA616 r ,• , 1 /? I \ Cool 6 ` 4 Minesiti L-.. ei) 2 31 e 45 %r •I 2 JIM 593 ti CORRAL r 913E 1 24/:".. Is` 1 Goodrl �, _•,� = ark + f �4a 20 21 Is rats )Valley 17 .�' R nal,'I ' c% I 4 �2 —i 1_ r . 1 R0. dio / 1 1' != l Minn t7.71 ifs 20 Its . 14 40 . Hubbard Park 1 Ae�J� S--',==1.-.11 �--�_ 0 �� .-ae 0 - 2`) \ 5 .rsMurPhtl + v Is ^+yup I1 #04. Dev 36 'S6 • 31: f��`Iide ch L 1 -• W 1•. • (33 6 J10 ks 7//) '''-Webster ▪ n••n! Siolioi, \Mesa ,Park : 2W a bste I2 —Fraverl w��t Res/ =� s9 Prefont lrle Mesa 4 t•/ • 6146 35 1 26 I 49,4M A �.� Tepee Cr6? '2! 1' NO. 1 1 1 11 .' 6 • • U .i Ct N MaF - , 1 I' 2_613,(2.)5 Rift, Gap Reservoir 5960 ) 6884 _....assn===e6,_ 0 + 2 574. secv X10.2 D'RQ, Rifle Creek t RICHARD D. LAMM Governor OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street -Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 July 7, 1982 Mr. Paul Mannino Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • Z/{ JERIS A. DANIELS"ON State Engineer rcril dik it )982 -149 L.J. Re: Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Dear Mr. Mannino: We have receivedthe above referenced proposal for a 16 -lot subdivision. Water would be supplied by two wells which are augmented under a plan for aug- mentation in Water Court Case No. 81CW56. The plan for augmentation allows for 30 residential units with lawn and garden irrigation, limited to 1000. square feet, through the doinestic water system. Covenants also restrictlawnand garden irrigation to 1000 square feet per lot. A separate irrigation s• ;tem may supply some of the lots, although details of this system are not presented and have not been reviewed. The water system is to be supplied by two wells which were originally constructed as exempt domestic wells (permit nos..109310 and 112781). Pump tests for the wells are included in the information submitted. The pump test for the east well is inconclusive since the drawdown did not stabilize. The east well supplied somewhat over 10 gpm for 12 hours until sand problems occurred. It would 'appear the sand problem may be related to the construction of the well. The westwell produced around 13 gpm during a stable' period towards the end of the well test. From the material presented, it appears the wells are in an alluvial material. Since a plan for augmentation exists, replacement wells or additi_.ra1. wells as alternate points of diversion should be available if required. If a problem exists with the wells at this point in time, it may be necessary to identify who will be responsible for their replacement or rehabilitation within a pre -determined period.... Ownership of the water system is unclear from the information submitted. Also, operation and maintenance responsibilities are somewhat te�ncclearoae lthough- they may be covered by paragraph 2(c) in the covenants. We fication of these issues may be appropriate. EXHIBIT 1 Mr. Paul Mannino July 7, 1982 35 Page 2 The soils investigation submitted with'the proposal indicates certain areas have slow percolation and high ground water and suggests evapotranspira- tion beds may be used. We would like to point out that evapotranspiration bedr could not be used as they are not authorized by the augmentation plan.- Unless alternative-methods(non-evapotranspiration) •of treating.sewage are. available for the problem lots consistent with county regulations, we could not recommend platting of the lots'. The drainage report indicates the site is two miles below the Rifle bap Reservoir, a Bureau of Reclamation project. The building of a subdivision below this dam will not alter the hazard rating of the dam. The drainage report is developed on the basis of a 9,400 cfs discharge from the dam during flood stage. We do not know what the 9,400 cfs figure represents, but we suspect that it may be.a 100year flood. Our records indicate the spillway capacity of this dam to be 32.500 cfs. and we believe this figure represents the probable maximum flood. •' Based on the above information, we would have no objection tothis, proposal provided evapotranspiration systems are prohibited. Also, we would ask the applicants to amend•their well permits so that our records will show their current use. Please let us know if you have any questions. HDS/KCK:mvf cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng. Reiner Haubold Stephen Spann Sincerely, IJZ).%P - Hal D. Simpson, •P.E.- • Assistant State Engineer EXHIBIT 1 (cont'd) 4IPolaY Country ,0. I) . 163 170310762222, ti••is S.u,COO. dld62 August 27, 1982 Office of the State. Engineer Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 818 Denver, CO 80203 ATTN: Keith Kepler RE: Rifle. Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing Solar Country Project No.: 181582 Dear Keith, In our platting of the above-named subdivision,. we have encountered a significant discrepancy, between the flow rate we used in analyzing the floodplain of Rifle Creek adjacent to the site and the flow rate your office terms "the probable maximum flood". Rifle Creek'Tanch Subdivision, First Filing, is bordered along its eastern limits by Rifle Creek. Approximately two miles upstream (north) of the site is the Rifle Gap Dam and Reservoir which was designed and built by the Bureau of Reclamation. A copy of the design plans were' obtained from Boyd Holt bf..the Grand Junction office of the Bureau of Reclamation. From these plans, a copy of which is enclosed, the following information is found. Maximum River Outlet Rate 325. c.f.s. Flow.Line_of Spillway 5960.0 Inflow Design Flood Peak Flow Rate Three -Day" Inflow Volume Maximum Water Surface Spillway Discharge Storage (above 5960.0) 9400 c.f.s. 9000 Ac -ft 5971.8 3645 c.f.s. 4625 Ac -ft Crest of Dam 5978.0 Projected values with water surface, at crest) Spillway Discharge 6000 c.f.s. Storage (above 5960.0) 6400 Ac -ft Converstion with Lonnie Lewis with the Engineering Services department of the Denver office of the Bureau of Reclamation indicated that the EXHIBIT 2 -2- 3.7 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Inflow Storm Peak Rate is 9400 c.f.s. Therefore the Design Inlow used by the Bureau of Reclamation in the design of Rifle Gap Dam is the PMP Storm and the Design Outflow of 3645 c.f.s. is the Probable Maximum Flood of Rifle Creek immediately downstream of Rifle Gap Dam. Enclosed are calculations'determining the floodplains for the•100-year Storm with 325 c.f.s. discharge from Rifle Gap (Total Flow = 5540 c.f.s.), for the PMP Storm with no detention in Rifle Gap Reservoir (Flow = 9400 c.f.s.), and for a flow of 32,500 c.f.s..(the quantity your office calls the probable maximum flood). Also enclosed are cross-sections of Rifle Creek adjacent' to the site and a plan viewshowing the floodplains of the three flow rates analyzed. Hal Simpson of your office stated that it is the policy of the -Division of Water Resources to recommend against development in the floodplain created by the maximum discharge of an upstream reservoir. The floodpl, n labelled "100 -year (Q=5540) Floodplain" fulfills this recommendation as it exceeds the floodplain that would be generated by a flow of 3645 c.f.s., the Probable Maximum Discharge of Rifle Gap Dam. Furthermore, the floodplain for a flow rate of 9400 c.f.s. exceeds that which would result"during maximum discharge from Rifle Gap with a 100 -year Storm coincidentally occuring on the area downstream.of the dam (Total Flow= 3645 + 5215 = 8860 c.f.s.). This is the flow rate used in the.preliminary Drainage Report for Rifle Creek Subdivision. In conclusion, we, request that your office review your previous. recommendations concerning our Drainage Report for Rifle Creek Subdivision, First.Filing, in consideration of the additional information and exhibits herewith enclosed. Thank you for your attention to. this project. Should you have any . questions or require more information, please.contact the undersigned.. Cordially, Christine M. Lytle, P.E Solar Country Enc. cc: Dennis Stranger, Garfield County Planning Department Kay Robinson EXHIBIT 2 (cont'd) v. ,��; CY c c?•4.6. RICHARD D. LAMM f-. 1$ Governor cn *`� �' fir,, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER. DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street -Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 September 24, 1982 Mr. Dennis Stranger• Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Rifle Creek Ranch 38 JERIS A DANIELSON . State Engineer Dear Mr. Stranger: We have reviewed our information concerning the Rifle Gap, Reservoir at the request of Christine Lytle of Solar Country. It appears our previous concerns regarding the proposed Rifle Creek Ranch subdivision and the flood- plain below the spillway of Rifle Gap Reservoir were the result of an error in our dam roster. We, therefore, withdraw our previously stated concern. We recommend approval of this proposal consistent with the water supply recommendation stated in our letter of July 7, 1982. - HDS/KCK:ma cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng. Reiner Haubold Steve Spann Christine Lytle, Solar Country Sincerely, 4. Hal D. Simplon, P.E. Assistant State Engineer EXHIBIT 3 hI Imo. COLORADO DE -PART ' OF HEALTH JitiL NUt" %� Richard D. Lamm * Governor /876 April 11, 1983 Garfield County Department of Development 2014 Lake Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Frank A Traylor M Executive Director ATTN: Mark L. Bean Re: State approval of the Solar Country Water System, Garfield County Dear Mr. _ Bean: By the request of Mr. Dennis Bradley, partner of the Solar Country Development, I am writing you to provide certain information perti- nent to your meetings with the developers of Solar Country. Since this development had not yet received formal State approval for its water system, Mr. Bradley requested me to inform you of the status of review. The Solar Country Water System has received a conditional approval based on compliance to a proposal worked out by Mr. Bradley and my- self. This proposal is described in the enclosed letter Mr. Bradley submitted to me. According to the procedure described in this pro- posal the Solar Country water system will provide water under the radioactivity limit w:»ether treated or not - therefore, the conditional approval is granted pending compliance to this proposal. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 320-8333, extension 3454. Sincerely, Palk Mike Mau Technical Review Engineer Drinking Water Section MM/db xc: John Blair, District Engineer "Garfield County Health Mr. Dennis Bradley 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER,COLORADO 80220 PHONE (303) 320-6137 S0c1�CJ WPI '! I 7 April 5, 1983 Michael Mau Colorado Department of health Drinking Water Section 4210 East llth Avenue Denver, CO 80220 Re: Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Proposed Water System Dear Mr. Mau: In regards to our telephone conversation on 'Tuesday 4/5/83, the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision is in final proceedures through the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations with the Planning and Zoning hearing scheduled fcr Wednesday 4/13/83 and the final hearing scheduled for April 18, 1983. To our knowledge, everything through the County Planning Department has been verbally approved with exception to the water system, which must be approved by your office. It is also our understanding that you have verbally approved the water system with exception to filtering radioactive particles out. With our pump test on both wells, a sand problem must be resolved before being put into use. Well No. 1 indicates excessive sand and that has been addressed within our water system report. Well No. 2 indicates some sand, but it is assumed that it will clear itself after bring pumped for a period of time. Water samples for tie first test in your lab were gathered after a short pumping time. This test indicated excessive radioactive limits and was not filtered -by your lab. The water samples for the second test were gathered after the water was clear. This water was filtered in your lab before testing and indicated that the radioactivity limits were met. Other wells are within the immediate drainage and no such radioactivity is known to us. An approved subdivision with a similar type of system is adjacent to this subdivision and such radioactivity is unknown. We feel that such radioactive particles have gathered in these two wells with stagnate water by not pumping the wells. It is our belief that once the sand problem is resolved, and the wells are pumped, the radioactive limits will be met. With the present appearance of this system the water must be filtered to meet the radioactive limits of the state. Additional designs and costs for such a filter system may be unnecessary if the sand problem is related to the radioactivity limits, or if the wells are reconditioned or relocated. We are also assuming that additional tests will be required after the system is constructed and before it can be put to use in this development. -2 -- In order to eliminate additional costs that may be unnecessary an_i to allow approval of this subdivision we propose the following steps outlining services to be performed to meet the state requirements. Step 1: Extend electric services to the wells and install well pumps to pump the sand out of and clear up the wells. Step 2: If Step 1 is not accomplished in one or both wells, recondition the wells or relocate the wells. Install adequate screening as may be required. Step 3: When one or both wells or relocated wells appear to be adequate, gather water samples and perform independent lab :.ests without being filtered and with filters to determine size of filter if required. Step 4: If lab tests still indicate that filters are required, a filter system will be designed for the water system, and approved by the State. Step 3 may be perfurme.i after Steps 1 or 2 and if a filter system is not required the system may be installed as now designed. If a filter system is required, the filter system will be designed to be incorporated within the present designed system. If wells are relocated, the piping system will be designed to be incorporated with the present designed system and approved by the State. In addition to the above, we have put a notice in t1;: Protective Covenants notifying the public, lot owners and residents of the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision that the domestic water contains a high sodoum content in excess of the Colorado Department of Health standards. Also, such notice will be added to tine Protective Covenants concerning the radioactive limits if such limits exceed the State requirements upon final testing of the water. At such time the Protective Covenants will be amended. We hope the information provided herein will be sufficient for your approval of this water system. We also would appreciate it if you could Lct the letter of approval to us by April 13, 1983 so we can submit it to the County Planning and Zoning meeting that evening. If you have any questions, co:^ments or recomendations, please contact us. Sincerely, ( / i Dennis 0. Bradley, partner Solar Country 1)OB/kkm cc. Robinson Munro II! 411 public Service Company CC©llorraacia P. 0. Box 152, Rifle, Co. 81650 Garfield County Planning Dept. 2014 Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Re: Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing We have reviewed the Plat for Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, submitted 3-15-83 by Solar Country for Ann Catherine Robinson. We find no objection to this Plat. RAM:dl Thank you. Sincerely, 42,4,Aj" Robert Murdock Engineering Dept. • �i tv r Rrc, 0 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH R«. 42,/S) Richard D. Lamm Governor March 8, 1983 Solar Country P.O. Box 163 Silt, Colorado 81650 Attention: Dennis Bradley Re: Proposed Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Water System Dear Mr. Bradley: Frank A. Traylor, M.D. Executive Director Along with the proposal for the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Water System, this Department received radioactivity analyses of your source waters (well #/1 and well #2) exceeding the radioactivity maximum contaminant levels. On September 30, 1982, I wrote a letter to Ann Robinson requesting additional analyses of these waters so that the gross alpha result could be adjusted by subtraction of the radioactivity due to water particulate sources. More recent analyses completed in December, 1982 showed that the waters did not exceed the radioactivity MCL's. Howard Olson of the state lab explained to me that unlike the first analyses these more recent analyses were filtered through a 0.45 micron filter. This filtering removed the effect of particulate source radioactivity. The quality of the water delivered to the consumer must conform with the maximum contaminant levels. What this means for the Rifle Creek Ranch. Subdivision is that: 1. Adequate treatment must be provided to ensure that water quality will conform with the mandatory MCL's (the present proposal of treating only with chlorination will not remove the radioactivity). 2. Or a new water source with water quality conforming with the MCL's needs to be developed. Please keep me abreast of your activity on this proposal. If you have any questions, contact me at 320-8333, extension 3454. Sincerely, WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION n Michael Mau Technical Review Engineer Drinking Water Section MM/j1 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE D .NVER,COLORADO 80220 PHONE (303) 320-8333 ADDENDUM "ENGINEERS IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COSTS" This addendum pertains •to the most extreme estimated costs. possible .to, meet the water quality requirements for the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision water system, in regards to the Colorado Department of Health test findings of radioactive particles in the water. 1. Relocate and redrill the two wells with a cable tool drilling rig, .install casing and perforated casing., Pump well for a 24 hour period and send water samples to the state for water quality tests. (Well depth approximately 75 feet) 2. Install a filter system designed for this water system and approved, by the state to remove radioactive particles. Filtraticn is based on two- Katadyn Filters Type MF -7R. Additional Estimated Costs $ 11,000.'00' Total Phase I Estimated Cost Total Phase II Estimated Cost $ 82,500.00 158,500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENTS COST $241, 000.00 (Average cost per lot for construction $15,000.00) DEPARTMENT OI I1L AYS �. STATE OF COLO DIVISION OF HIG R,AYS DOH Form 101 k, AY2 2' 1984 Rev. November, 1- hltom' STATE -DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS GA RFiEI D co, PLAT ``ri ACCESS PERMIT SH No/MP/Side Local Jurisdiction Dist/Section/Patrol DOH Permit No Permit Fee Date of Transmittal Ann Cf: i..herinr:: Robinson (herein called permittee) is granted permission to construct an access approach on the side of State Highway , a distance of feet from milepost also known as , for the purpose of obtaining access to The access approach shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with the State Highway Access Code, the terms and conditions of this permit, site requirements noted below, this paragraph, and listed attachments. This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access approach and its use violate any of the terms and conditions of this permit or the State Highway Access Code. The use of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades and flagmen are required at all times during access approach construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, Part VI. The Department of Highways, its employees and agents shall be indemnified and held harmless against any action or damage to property or persons sustained by reason of the exercise and use of this permit. SITE REQUIREMENTS riveway shall be constructed 24 feet wide with 30 foot radii. The first 20 feet beyond the closesthighway lane, shall slope down and away from the tih highway at a i% grade. 1. The last 21" of fill to be 12" of Class 1, 6" of Class f if asphalt 3'j of asphalt to property line. If no asphalt is placed, the fill he a good grade Pit run gravel with the last 6" of 3/4" crushes' roac. base. This all to be compacted to ! 5% PASHTO Standard Compaction Requirements. 4. 24" CMP culvert will be placed in the irrigation stitch. 5. During work in the right of way of the highway, warning constructical signs, flagpersons a,:,d barricades will be used as stated in the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices." 6. The fence may be cut, but must have posts on either side, braced ,ro-::�r3 anti fence stretched. 7. If gate is required, this will be responsibility of the permittee. 8. If traffic from this development increases to cause a hazard on thy, highway, a<ccel/decel lanes may be needed in the future, at the per:uit. ex?aense. Any disturk,ed area to be returned to original contour and condition. NOTE: This permit replaces Permit No. 682026 which expired. Where the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority, local approval is required MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY By (X) Date Title Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall bo finished within 45 days from initiation. The permitted access approach shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to being used. The permittee shall notify with the Colorado Department of Highways in at at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access. Permittee (X) Date This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the State Department of Highways. STATE OF COLORADO, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS E.N. HAASE, CHIEF ENGINEER By(X) Date Title COPY DISTRIBUTION White, MTCE Section Pink, Applicant Canary, Local Jurisdictionk- White, Staff ROW Pink, MTCE Patrol File Canary, Inspector Blue, Traffic Eng. r, ► �t The following paragraphs are standard terms and conditions of the permit. A copy of the State Highway Access Code is available for your review at your issuing authority or the State Department of Highways. 1. The permitted access approach shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to being used. In accepting the permit, the applicant agrees to all terms and conditions of the permit. If the applicant does not agree to alt the terms and conditions of the permit, the permit shall be deemed denied. 2. Should the permittee or applicant object to any of the terms or conditions of the permit placed therein by the Department, he must do so within 60 days of transmittal of the permit for his signature. He may, 1) make his objections known to the issuing office of the Department and request reconsideration of the Department's action, and 2) he may appeal the Department's action to a hearing before the Colorado Highway Commission or before a hearing officer, at the discretion to the Commission. 3 Any appeal by the applicant or permittee of action by the issuing authority when it is the local government of jurisdiction under Code Section 2.4, shall be to the local government and be consistent with the standard appeal procedures of the local government. 4. The permittee or applicant wishing to appeal to the Colorado Highway Commission shall make his request for the hearing in writing and submit it to the Colorado Highway Commission, 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222. The request shall include reasons the permittee or applicant is appealing the action and may include recommendations by the permittee or applicant that would be acceptable to him. 5. The Department may consider any objections and requested revisions at the request of the applicant or permittee. If agreement is reached, the Department, with the approval of the local issuing authority (if applicable), may revise the permit accordingly. issue a new permit, or require the applicant to reapply for reconsideration. Changes in the original application or proposed design will normally require submittal of a new application. 6. Regardless of any communications, meetings, or negotiations with the Department regarding revisions and objections to the permit or a denial, if the permittee or applicant wishes to appeal the Department's decision to a hearing before the Colorado Highway Commission. he must do so within 60 days of transmittal of the notice of denial or transmittal of the permit. 7. The permit shall be deemed null and void if the access approach is not under construction within one year of the permit issue date or before the expiration of any authorized extension. A time extension, not to exceed one year for each extension. may be requested of the issuing authority in writing by the applicant prior to expiration of the permit. Denial of an extension may occur only when the issuing authority assertains and documents that unforeseen and significant changes in highway traffic operations or proposed access approach operation, have or will occur that were not accounted for in the issuing of the permit. 8. The applicant shall notify the individual or the office specified on his permit of the pending construction at least 48 hours prior to construction in State Highway rights-of-way. The access approach shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation of construction within the right-of-way. A construction time extension not to exceed 30 working days may be requested from the individual or office specified on the permit. 9. The construction of the access approach and its appurtenances as required by the terms and conditions of the permit shall be completed at the expense of the applicant except as provided below. 10. It is the responsibility of the owner of the property to ensure the use of the access approach to the property is not in violation of the code, permit terms and conditions, or the Act. The terms and conditions of the permit are binding upon all assigns. successors -in -interests and heirs. 11. When a permitted driveway is constructed or used in violation of the code, permit terms and conditions, or the Act, either the issuing authority or the Department or both may obtain a court order enjoining violation of the access code, permit terms and conditions, or the Act. Such access permits may be revoked by the issuing authority if, at any time, the permitted driveway and its use fail to meet the requirements of the Act, the access code, or the terms and conditions of the permit. 12. Reconstruction, relocation, or conformance with this code of any driveway, whether constructed before, on or after June 30. 1979, may be required by the Department with written concurrence of the appropriate local authority either at the property owner's expense if the reconstruction or relocation is necessitated by a change in the use of the property or a change in the type of driveway operation or at the expense of the Department if the reconstruction or relocation is necessitated by changes in road or traffic conditions. The necessity for the relocation or reconstruction shall be determined by reference to the standards set forth in the code. 13. The property owner or representative serviced by a lawful access approach may make a physical improvements to the access approach with the permission of the issuing authority. The applicant shall make his request on standard permit application forms and specify that his request is for improvements per this subsection. Denial of the application for improvements does not constitute revoking the existing access approach authorization. 14. Parking on state highway right of way is prohibited except where posted. 15. After sight distance requirements are met and an access permit issued, a sign structure or parked vehicle shall not be permitted where it will obstruct the required sight distance. 16. In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be securely braced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. All posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the engineering district representative of the Department. 17. Where necessary to remove or relocate a state highway traffic control device for the construction of a permitted access approach. such relocation or removal shall be accomplished by the applicant at his expense and at the direction of the Department. Any damage to the state highway beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. 18. A copy of the permit shall be available for review at the construction site. If necessary, minor changes and additions in construction may be ordered by the Department field inspector to meet unanticipated site conditions. 19. The permit may require the contractor to notify the individual or office specified on the permit at certain phases in construction to allow the field inspector to inspect various aspects of construction such as concrete forms, subbase, and base course compaction. 20. The occupant and the property owner of the property serviced by the access approach shall be responsible for (1) meeting the terms and conditions of the permit and, (2) the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon the access approach(es) even though deposited on the access in the course of the Department highway snow removal operations. The Department shall maintain in unincorporated areas the highway drainage system, including those culverts under the access approach which are part of that system within the right-of-way. NOTE: "Act" means the highway access statute, CRS 1973, 43-2-147 as amended. "Code" means the State Highway Access Code as adopted and amended by the Colorado Highway Commission. "Department" means the State Department of Highways. PHASE II EXHIBIT "B" Cont. Construction Cost Estimate for Improvements of Block 1, Lots 1-11 1. Water PVC Pipe 640 LF - 8" 2760 LF - 6" Gate Valve and Boxes 6" 7 units Fittings Fire Hydrants 5 units 2' Manhole 2 units Service Connections 11 units TOTAL 2. Roads Blue Sage Drive Cut and Fill Pit Run and Base Chip and Seal 1280 LF 18" CMP 140 LF TOTAL Cedar Ridge Drive Cut and Fill Pit and Run and Base Chip and Seal 2110 LF 18" CMP 120 LF TOTAL Entrance Asphalt 3" 900 yd 2 Pit and Run and Base TOTAL $4,600 18, 200 2,450 1,000 5,000 1,600 1,650 $11,550 1,475 5,725 1,750 $31,125 2,475 9,900 1,500 $10,800 1,700 • C. $20,500 $45,000 $12, 500 3. Pond and Outlet Structure Cut $ 1,900 Riprip (At run and Base) 300 36" CMP 260 LF 6,500 Concrete and Steel 1,300 TOTAL $10,000 4. Electrical TOTAL $35,000 Construction Surveys and Engineering TOTAL $ 4,000 TOTAL PHASE II $161,500 rK Ferris &Co. REAL ESTATE April 18, 1983 TO: GARFIELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RE: RIFLE CREEK RANCH SUBDIVISION FINAL APPROVAL At this particular time, it is difficult to arrive at an accurate appraisal of home sites. Sales are sparce due to the unstable economy, so the only comparisons are listings and sales within the last 1 1/2 years. SALES 28 Acres plus Home: $285,000.00 Home plus 3 acres valued at: $150,000.00 Remaining 25 acres: 135,000.00 ($5,400/acre) 43 Acres plus Cabin: $200,000.00 Rifle Creek Estates Subdivision: Last lot sold — 2 acres all improved: $40,000 LISTINGS IN AREA 25 Acres unimproved: 2 Acres plus older home: 2 Acres plus home: 3 improved lots plus additional 18 acres partially improved lots: $168,000.00 88,000.00 87,000.00 300,000.00 It is our opinion that a reasonable sale price should be between $30,000.00 and $40,000.00 value per home site. Sincerely, ohn P. Ferris e`- Broker Connie J. Carlstrom Associate Broker KR:kls cc: Files J 201 West Third St., Suite 101 Box 432 Rifle, Colorado 81650 (303) 625-4242 • • FIRST NATIONAL BANK IF TE, BOX 1360 • RIFLE, COLO. 81650 Board of County Commissioners Garfield County Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: KAY ROBINSON Gentlemen: April 20, 1983 (303) 625-1310 Mrs. Robinson has requested a letter of credit in the amount of $250,000 (plus or minus) to satisfy a requirement on Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision. Mrs. Robinson has spent at least two years and $25,000 to reach the state she is at currently. The cost of obtaining a letter of credit will have to be passed on to the eventual purchaser. As you know, due to the unfortunate incident which occurred on May 2, 1982, the demand for this type of unit has certainly diminished. It therefore seems foolish to me that Mrs. Robinson is being asked to put up a performance bond on this project, as there is no reason for her continuing until there is a demand for the lots. It would certainly seem to me to be more sensible for the Commissioners to allow her to put the project "on the back burner" until such a time as the demand for this type of unit is here. I would appreciate any consideration that you might give this matter at this time. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely yours, Allen R. Koeneke President ARK/dr • • SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMI ITS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of April, 1983, between Ann Catherine Robinson, hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, hereinafter referred to as the "County", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property located in Garfield County, Colorado, more particularly described on the final plat for Rifle Creek Ranch, which is filed on even date herewith, which real property is now known as "Rifle Creek Ranch", hereinafter referred to as the "Development"; and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the final plat (herjeinafter referred to as the "Plat") for the Development, Developer wishes to enter into this Subdivision Improvements Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") with the County; and WHEREAS, the County has required and Developer has agreed to provide security or collateral sufficient in the judgment of the County to make reasonable provision for completion of certain public improvements as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Developer has agreed to execute and deliver a letter of credit to the County to secure and guarantee its performance of this Agreement and has agreed to certain restrictions regarding the issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy within the subdivision, all as more fully set forth hereinafter; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the following mutual covenants and agreements, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Developer's Performance. On or before Nay 1, 1985, Developer agrees to construct and install, or to cause to be constructed and installed, at its sole expense, those public improvements set forth as items 1. through on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Developer agrees that all of the public improvements to be completed as identified on Exhibit "B" attached hereto shall be constructed in compliance with the following: a) All final plat documents submitted prior to or at the time of final plat approval. b) All laws of the United States, State of Colorado, and its various agencies, affected special districts, and/or municipalities providing utility services. c) Such other designs, drawings, reaps, specifications, sketches and other matter submitted to and approved by any of the above stated governmental entities. The County agrees that provided such improvements are installed in accordance with this paragraph one, then Developer shall be deemed to have satisfied all terms and conditions of the zoning and subdivision laws, resolutions and regulations of Garfield County, Colorado including, but not limited to, Resolution No. 82-84 adopted by the County on April 12, 1982, and Resolution No. 82-225 adopted by the County on August 23, 1982. /21W 2. Cost of Improvements. It is understood, for purposes of this i agreement, �� that the cost of all sof said public improvements is 012 a $= (Total Construction Costs"), based upon the engineering cost estimates set forth on Exhibit "B", which amount the County finds reasonable and hereby approves and accepts. Developer shall provide, on request of the County, written confirmation of such estimates by Developer's engineering cij "R' •• consultants and the public utilities furnishing such improvements. t . , t t t...-1. '�,, t-,-_ ; -.}n .f - ,,i 3. Security for Improvements. On or before June 1, 1983, Developer shall deliver a letter of credit issued by a state or national banking institution which is licensed to do business in the State of Colorado, in a form acceptable to the County, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld. The amount of said letter of credit shall be equal to the "Total Construction Costs" of $- , plus an inflation factor, as provided for in Paragraph 4 below. In the event Developer fails to deliver said letter of credit by June 1, 1983, then the Plat may be vacated by the County and in such event all approvals of the Subdivision by the County shall be deemed to have been withdrawn and rendered null and void by such vacation and all parties shall be released from any further obligation hereunder. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, Developer has delivered its written consent to said vacation in the event an acceptable letter of credit is not delivered within the time provided; and this consent is binding upon its successors and assigns. UponDeveloperdelivering to the County said letter of credit, Developer shall be entitled to enter into pre -sales agreements for the sale of lots. However, no title to lots shall be conveyed nor building permits issued until the County has accepted the completed improvements. Upon delivery to the County of said letter of credit, the County shall issue written approval in a form recordable in the office of the Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, stating that said letter of credit has been provided pursuant to this Agreement and that pre -sales agreements may be made. However, the County shall not be required to issue building permits for any buildings constructed within the PUD until such time as all improvements have been accepted by the County, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided that in the event weather or other factors beyond the reasonable control of Developer delay the installation of dewalk-,----=curb- and-gu.tteP or surface paving, such delay shall not prevent the issuance of building permits so long as the letter of credit remains in full force and effect. Upon receipt from Developer of its certification that the public improvements set forth on Exhibit "B" have been completed and paid for, the County shall return to Developer the letter of credit marked "satisfied in full" and shall acknowledge that all improvements have been completed in a satisfactory manner and shall otherwise release the aforesaid letter of credit, in recordable form if requested by Developer. The County may, at its option, permit Developer to substitute other collateral acceptable to the County for the collateral origianally given by Developer to secure the completion of the improvements as hereinabove \ provided. 4. Inflation Adjustment. As provided in paragrpagh 3 above, the amount of collateral shall be adjusted on an annual basis for inflation based upon the Consumer Price Index, Denver -All Urban Consumers Index, All Items, 1967 equals 100, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Each year during the term of this agreement, commencing on the first day of of each year, the base amount of the collateral shall be adjusted by computing the increase, if any, in the cost of living for the preceding year period and adding the same to the base amount of the collateral. The base index number shall be the CPI number for 1982 of , and the corresponding CPI number for the months of each succeeding year shall be the current index number. The increase, if any, betweeen the base index number and the current number (expressed as a percentage) shall be multiplied by the base amount of the collateral and any resulting positive product shall be added to the base amount of the collateral and the total thereof shalll be the adjusted amount of collateral. The parties hereby agree that a new letter of credit will be issued which will equal the amount of the adjusted amount of collateral. If at any time during the term or any extension hereof said Consumer Price Index is no longer published, the parties shall use such other index as is generally recognized or accepted for the purpose of making similar determinatioins of purchasing power. 2 • • 5. Notice of Deficiencies,. If the County determines that the improvements within any phase are not constructed in compliance with the specifications therefor, it shall furnish a written list of specific deficiencies to Developer. If the deficiencies have not been corrected, or if satisfactory arrangements have not been made to correct such deficiencies, within thirty (30) days after the list is furnished, the County may draw on the letter of credit such funds as may be necessary to complete the construction of the improvements in accordance with such specifications. 6. Improvement Sequence. Paving of the street improvements required to be completed by Developer shall not be done until all utility lines to be placed in or under the streets have been completely installed. 7. Enforcement. In addition to any rights which may be provided by Colorado statute, it is mutually agreed that the County or any purchaser of a lot or unit within the subdivision shall have the authority to bring an action in the District Court of Garfield County, Colorado, to compel the enforcement of this Agreement. Such authority shall include the right to compel rescission of any sale, conveyance, or transfer of any lot or unit contrary to the provisions of this Agreement, or as set forth on the Plat of the subdivision, or in any separate recorded instrument. Any such action shall be commenced prior to the issuance of a building permit by the County for such lot or unit; and in the event no such action is so commenced, then the County and any purchaser shall be deemed to have waived their rights and authority herein provided. 8. Approval of Plat. The County agrees to approval of the Plat subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 9. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended from time to time, provided that such amendment be in writing and signed by the parties hereto. 10. Binding effect. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the title to each lot or unit within the subdivision and the rights and obligations as contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Developer, its successors and assigns. A1'1'EST : Deputy Clerk to the Board A'1'11ST : Secretary 3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIEL,D COUNTY, COLORADO Chairman DEVELOPER: Ann Catherine Robinson • • CONSENT TO VACATION OF PLAT Ann Catherine Robinson, as owner of certain real property located in Garfield County, Colorado, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and pursuant to the Subdivision Improvements Agreement, dated the day 1983, between Ann Catherine Robinson, self, and the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, which Agreement, provided inter alia, that if a Letter of Credit issued by a National Banking Institution for the construction of subdivision improvements in a form acceptable to Garifled County has not been delivered on or before the 1st day of June, 1983, the subdivision plat of Rifle Creek Ranch shall be vacated in its entirety. By this instrument delivered to the County of Garfield by the aforesaid Ann Catherine Robinson, the consent of the undersigned is hereby given to the filing of such instruments of vacation that the County may deem proper or advisable. DATED this day of , 1983. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Chairman Deputy Clerk to the Board DEVELOPER: Ann Catherine Robinson A'1'1'EST : Secretary EXHIBIT tIF I SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT DRAB THIS AGREEMENT,• made and entered into this day of February, 1983, by and between Ann Catherine Robinson (hereinafter called "Developer") and the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, State of Colorado (hereinafter called "County") being the parties hereto: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval of the Final Plat of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, agrees to enter into a Subdivision Improvements Agreement as provided for by Section 30-28-137, C.R.S. 1973, as amender' and Section 3.10.01, Garfield County Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the same authority, Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the reasonable judgment of the County to make reasonable provision for completion of certain public improvements set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, Developer has agreed to provide collateral to guarantee performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement including construction of the above- referenced public improvements by means of a performance mortgage on lots hereinafter designated;' NOW• THEREFORE, in consideration of the •following mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and promises and in considerat5ln of the approval and recording of the final plat of Rrf:e Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, Developer and County agree as follows: 1. Developer agrees to construct and install, at her own expense, all those public improvements set forth on Exhibit A. V( ,) Oli• 43 N kt d 2. The Developer agrees that all of those certain ils•••t public improvements above referred to contai ed in Phase I of the -‘t cdo `, \ development shall be constructed within ) years after kl recording of the final plat herein. Construction of said 3. improvements in Phase II shall be completed within five (5) years V4Z after said recording. Phase I is Block 2 on the Final Plat; Phase N NOII is Block l thereon. All such construction shall be in Fi O compliance with the following: V k4)1o � ` (a) All final plat and other documents v1 i submitted by the Developer and approved by the County at the time of final plat approval. 4 (b) All laws of the United States, State of v , Colorado, County of Garfield, affected special•districts or and/or servicing authorities. lit. -,t) (c) Garfield County construction standards. (d) State of Colorado Highway Department v standards pnc� access improvement criteria. Q •_ Such other designs, drawings, maps, cl� specifications, sketches, or other matters submitted by 0'Developer to and approved by the above -stated governmental entities. 3. To guarantee performance by Developer of her obligations as set forth herein, Developer agrees to execute and deliver to County prior to *recording of the final plat herein a performancemortgage on the following real property: Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block One, Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing . 4. It is further mutually agreed that pursuant to the provision of Section 30-28-137(2) C.R.S. 1973, as amended, that as improvements are completed, or upon substitution of certificates of deposit or lettersof.. credit for each lot equal to 1/8 of the then estimated cost of completing all improvements, which substitute security shall be deposited with the county, the Developer'may apply to the County for a release of said mortgage on each such lot. Immediately upon inspection and approval of all completed improvements, the County shall release all colla eral. If the County determines that any such improvements are not constructed in substantial compliance with above specifications, standards, or requirements, County shall furnish Developer with a list of specific alleged deficiencies and shall be entitled to withhold only sufficient collateral to insure such substantial compliance. If the County determines correctly and in good faith that the Developer has not or cannot construct any or all of the improvements in accordance with said specifications, standards, or requirements, the County may proceed to foreclose upon sa " mortgage and shall apply the proceeds of such foreclosure sale as may be necessary to construct said improvements in accordance with this agreement. 5. It is further mutually agreed that upon the completion of all improvements herein. in substantial compliance with th e,.provisions hereof that Developer shall then be en itled to a prompt release of the mortgage or other collateral herein. 6. Developer agrees that title to the above mortgaged real property shall be merchantable in Developer free and clear of liens and encumbrances except the deed of trust for the benefit of Rhoda Miller recorded in Book 453 at Page 212, Garfield County Records. 7. The County hereby agrees to the approval of th final plat of Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision, First Filing, subject only to the terms and conditions hereof. 8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this agreement may be amended from time to time in writing signed by said parties. 9. This agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the parties hereto. -3- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first written above. COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF GARFIELD By Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County ATTEST: Deputy Clerk of the County DEVELOPER Ann Catherine Robinson STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of February, 1983, by as Chairman, Board of ,County Commissioners of Garfield County and as Deputy Clerk of the County. My commission expires: Notary Public Address The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of February, 1983, by Ann Catherine Robinson, as Developer. My commission expires: Notary Public Address Exhibit '4" IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE The following cost estimates are based on information gathered in September, 1982 based on the owner being the contractor and installing all improvements except electrical services. Costs include on site materials to be used. These cost estimates are not to be used forbid items and may fluctuate depending upon time elements, economics and on site"Materials. Refer to page 15 for Construction Phase Items. PHASE I 1. Water System 2. Road System 9 Creek Side Drive iy /IP 3. Electrical System 4. Construction Surveys and Engineering C.31 ao oo.. 4 Y52,000.00 11,000.00 7,500.00 1,000.00 PHASE I ESTIMATED COST 71, 0 00 ..PHASE II 1. Water System $34,500.00 2. Road Systems Blue Sage Drive�� $20, 500.0 /2$O L/ Cedar Ridge Drive '5/1".- 45,000.00 2/i0 L F Highway Entrance lanes - 12,500.00 Gulch crossing on Cedar Ridge Drive. No. Detention Pond. (with Detention Pond structures add $3,000.00), 7,000.00 TOTAL ROAD SYSTEM 85,000.00 3., Electrical System 35,000.00 4. Construction Surveys and Engineering 4,000.00 PHASE II ESTIMATED COST PHASE I & II TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $158,500.00 $230,000.00 (Average cost per lot for construction cost $14,375.00) /� GS, / .� 46e.e sSeley QCL?p P?�,1� . Me. e0.41 eteo eQ p7 7407-470.0 : 7$ fi cat, (2 )r7 a. f c.N o "E" C10r T r !J.• t; -t April 5, 1983 Michael Mau Colorado Department of Health Drinking Water Section 4210 Fast l l th Avenue Denver, CO S0220 Re: Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision Proposed Water System Dear Mr. Mau: In regards to our telephone conversation on Tuesday 4/5/83, the Rifle Creek Ranch Subdivision is in final proceedures through the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations with the Planning and Zoning hearing scheduled fcr Wednesday 4/13/83 and the final hearing scheduled for April 18, 1983. To our knowledge, everything through the County Planning Department Las been verbally approved with e=xception to the water system, which must be approved by your office. It is also our understanding that you have verbally approved the water system with e=:cepticn to filtering radioactive particles nut. With our pump test on both wells, a sand problem oust be resolved before being put into use. Well No. 1 indicates excessive sand and that has been addressed within our water system report. Well No. 2 indicates some sand, but it is assumed that it will clear itself after bring pumped for a period of tine. Water samples for the first test in your lab were gathered after a sort pumping time. This test indicated excessive radioactive limits and was not filtered by your lab. The water samples for the second test were gathered after the water was clear. This water was filtered in your lab before testing and indicated that the radioactivity limits were met. Other wells are within the immediate drainage and no such radioactivity is known to us. An approved subdivision with a similar type of system is adiacent to this subdivision and such radioactivity is unknown. We feel that such radioactive particles have gathered in these two wells with stagnate water by not pumping the wells. It is our belief that once the sand problem is resolved, and the wells are pumped, the radioactive limits will be met. With the present appearance of this system the water must be filtered to meet the radioactive limits of the state. Additional designs and costs for such a filter system may be unnecessary if the sand problem is related to the radioactivity limits, or if the wells are reconditioned or relocated. We are also assuming that additional tests will be required after the system is constructed and before it can be put to use in this development. .s -2- In order to eliminate additional costs that may be unnecessary ani to allow approval of this subdivision we propose the following steps outlining services to be performed to meet the state requirements. Step 1: Extend electric services to the wells and install well pumps to pump the sand out of and clear up the wells. Step 2: if Step 1 is not accomplished in one or both wells, recondition the wells or relocate the wells. Install adequate screening as may be required. Step 3: When one or both wells or relocated wells appear to be adequate, gather water samples and perform independent lob ests without being filtered and with filters to determine siee of filter if required. Step 4: If lab tests still indicate that filters are re;uired, a filter system will be designed for the water system, and approved by the State. Step 3 may be perfume.: after Steps 1 or 2 and if a filter system is not required the system may be installed as now designed. If a filter system is required, the filter system will.be designed to be incorporated within the present designed system. If wells are relocated, the p ipi,.g system will be de=signed to be incorporated with the present designed system and approved by the State. In addition to the above, we have put a notice in the Protective Covenants notifying the public, lot owners and residents of the Rifle Creek, Ranch Subdivision that the domestic water contains a high sodoum content in excess of the Colorado Department of Health standards. Also, such notice will be added to ti:e Protective Covenants concerning the radioactive limits if such limits eceed the State requirements upon final testing of the water. At such time the Protective Covenants will be amended. '.:e hope the information provided herein will he sufficient for your approval of this water system. \e also would appreciate it if you could `..t the letter of approval to us by April 13, 1y83 so we can submit it to tie County Planning and Zoning meeting that evening. If you have any questions, co-,e-Ients or recomendations, please contact us. Sincerely, Dennis 0. Bradley, partner Solar Country DOB/kk:n cc. Robinson ;.?unro