HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.0 CorrespondenceJOHN L. KEMP
ATTORNEY AT LAW
811 COLORADO AVENUE
P. O. BOX 888
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81801
PHONE 1808) 048.8474
April 29, 1977
Mr. K. T. Johnson
Assistant County Attorney
P. O. Box 1055
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Sievers Land Company
Special Use Permit
to extract gravel
Dear K. T.:
You and I discussed this matter by telephone this morning.
I am enclosing two originals and two copies of the first two
pages of the above client's application for Special Use Permit.
These pages are exactly the same as the those currently on file
with the exception that in the paragraph entitled "Purpose" on
the first page, the reference to the state statute is now
C.R.S. 34-32-110 instead of 34-32-111. On the second page all
references to County Road 108 have been deleted and instead
County Road 109 is referred to since this is the correct road
designation. Both of these matters were apparently typographical
errors by the original attorney who prepared the application.
The only one of any consequence to us is the statutory
reference since, in applying to the state for a state permit
under the Land Reclamation Board I find out that C.R.S. 34-32-110,
under such Board's rules applies to a procedure for an emergency
permit to be issued in ten days for the sale of gravel only to
governmental agencies. Whereas, the reference to C.R.S. 34-32-110
applies to all other such permits which is what is desired by this
client. You will not be able to tell this from reading those
statutes, but it can be easily checked with the Department of
Natural Resources, Land Reclamation Board in Denver whose number
is 8923567.
In any event, it did not appear to me that it would in any
way affect the issuance or non -issuance of the special use permit
from the county.
LARRY E. O'BRIAN
PRESIDENT
May 24, 1979
Helen Bond
5777 South Rapp Street
Littleton, Colorado 80120
Dear Helen:
9989 West 60th Avenue
Arvada, Colorado 80004
PHONE 303-423-7297
The application for the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation permit will include:
1. Baseline statements or studies where necessary on
a. soils
b. vegetation
c. water
d. wildlife
e. climate
2. Mining Plans and Mining Timetable narrative plus: '
a. Map showing legal description boundaries and including touching
surface owners of record, name and location of creeks, roads,
buildings, oil and gas wells and leases, power lines, phone lines,
topography, area of affected land and setbacks.
b. Map showing location of current soils, water resources, principle
vegetation.
c. Map showing stages of mining, post mining contours, stockpiles for
soils, overburden and specification aggregate.
3. Reclamation Plan and Reclamation Timetable narratives including, where
applicable, revegetation, water impoundment, water use, wildlife habitat,
residential plans, regrading and topsoiling, a map showing details of
Reclamation Plan.
4. Reclamation cost on a phase basis.
5. Land uses surrounding affected lands.
6. Traffic routes and trips to be made.
7. County -State -Federal -compliance with regulations regarding water, air
and noise pollution.
After reviewing the requirements of Garfield County, it appears to me that the
requirements of the State of Colorado will most likely meet all County requirements,
Helen Bond
May 24, 1979
2
except perhaps the traffic question. We have included traffic in the application
so that hopefully one complete set of data will do for both entities.
If we can be of further help in this regard, please advise.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENT, INC.
LEO:cm
LArry
O'Brian
SIEVERS RANCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
5777 South Rapp St. 3794 County Road 109
Littleton, Colorado 80120 Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Phone (303) 794-0394 Phone (303) 963-2335
May 29, 1979
Mr. John L. Kemp
611 Colorado Avenue
P.O. Box 698
Glenwood Springs, Colo. 81601
Dear John,
Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Larry O'Brian in
which he lists the data he is compiling for the state app-
lication. The county and state requirements seem„to parallel.
When you find out what the County application requirements are
in detail and what the Planners requests. or suggestions are
please let us know. We can then establish a time table for
accommodating the applications.
Enclosure
HHB/hhb
Very Truly Yours,
Helen Bond, Sec./Treas.
S17lcC(A—C
SIEVERS RANCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
!~777 South Rapp St. 3794 County Road 109
Littleton, Colorado 80120 Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Phone (303) 794-0394 Phone (303) 963-2335
June 6, 1981
Mr. Howard Vagneur
RAM CONSTRUCTION & EXCAVATING, INC.
Box 646
Woody Creek, Colorado 81656
Dear Howard:
Sievers Ranch & Development Co, has been notified by Garfield County
authorities that delivery trucks from Sievers Pit have been using the
Hardwick Bridge on County Road 109., The use of this bridge by delivery
trucks, either loaded or empty, and heavy equipment, which are under
control of or associated with Sievers Lessee, Ram Construction & Exca-
vating, Inc. or' Sub -Lessees Fox Aggregates, Inc., and Fox Concrete, Inc.,
is in violation of Special. Use Permits granted to Sievers Ranch & Develop-
ment Co. for the operations at Sievers Pit. The use of the Hardida
Bridge has occurred without the knowledge of Sievers and will cease
immediately.
As stated in LEASE & AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF GRAVEL dated
May 2, 1980 as amen a aragra h 5'B, page-3i—
"All
aged"All provisions and revisions, amendments, expansions, or modi-
fications to Lessor's permits from Colorado Mined Land Reclama-
tion Board, or Le:mores Special Use Permit in the County of
Garfield, State of Colorado, are incorporated into and become an
integral part of this Agreement. Lessee shall comply with all
applicable Federal„ state and local laws, rules and governmental
agency regulations."
"Any such violations will be promptly corrected by Lessee within
a reasonable amount of time. Failure by Lessee to correct a
violation will constitute a default by Lessee, and, at the option
of Lessor, will terminate this Lease."
We require your immediate attention on this matter.
Sincerely,
4614,
Helen H. Bond
Secretary Treasurer
cc: Fox Aggregates, Inc./Fox Concrete, Inc.
A. Ab.analp, Garfield County Attorney
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SACRAMENTO DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
650 CAPITOL MALL
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF SPKCO-0
Mrs. Helen Bond
Sievers Ranch and Development
5777 South Rapp
Littleton, Colorado 80120
4 September 1979
This is in reference to your inquiry as to the need of a Department of
the Army Permit, in conjunction with a gravel removal operatiOhy ]Ideated
on your property in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 89 West, and
Section 18, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, nearCarbondale, Garfield
County, Colorado.
As a result of a site inspection on 5 July 1979, by Corps of Engineers
personnel from our Grand Junction Office, it has been determined that
a Department of the Army Permit will not be required, for the work as
described at the above mentioned location.
Since your proposed gravel removal will occur above an existing irrigation
ditch which follows an elevation contour at 6000 + feet, there will be no
waterway or wetland affected.
As was pointed out to you on site, any placement of dredged or fill
material into a "waters of the United States" or "adjacent wetland"
would require a Section 404 permit prior to the work.
On the upstream end of the property above the ditch headgate your
contractor should be cautioned during this extraction process not to
push any material over the river bank.
Should you have further questions, you may contact our Grand Junction
Regulatory Office, telephone (303) 243-1199.
Copy furnished:
Ms. Stephany Andreasen
Garfield County Planning Office
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Sincerely,
r \;C L.
t G. W. PROBASCO
Chief, Construction—Operations
Division