Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application & Correspondence#10 ENTERPRISES, LLC 5701 Woodway Drive Houston, TX 77057 September 19, 2005 Fred Jarman Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8`h Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: High Lonesome Lodge Resort Special Use Permit Application Dear Mr. Jarman: This letter will confirm Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, L.L.P., is authorized to act as our agent concerning our special use permit application for a resort for High Lonesome Lodge near Debeyue, Colorado. SURFACE PROPERTY OWNERS: John Lamicq, Jr. 635 19-1/2 Road Grand Junction, CO 81503-9501 The Dougherty Ranch Trust J.V. Dougherty, Jr. 2250 J Road Grand Junction, CO 81505-9328 John V. and Carol F. Cassidy 57100 M.E. Road Collbran, CO 81624 SEVERED MINERAL INTEREST OWNERS: Occidental Oil Shale Attn: Property Tax Dept. P.O. Box 27570 Houston, TX 77227-7570 Karen J. Bosch 3151 F Road Grand Junction, CO 81504-5948 Tilton Trustee Attn: Arch Tilton 1441 Patterson Road, Unit 103 Grand Junction, CO 81506-1906 Thomas W. Woodward HC 30 Box 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-9800 Mitchell Lekas 1015 Bermuda Drive Concord, CA 94518-3916 Marjorie A. and Ernest J. Gerbaz 904 Palmer Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Robert Patricia Siegfried 5350 War Paint Place Colorado Springs, CO 80922 Albertson Ranches Co. Attn: Dale Albertson P.O. Box 420 De Beque, CO 81630 John Richard and Margaret K. Latham Julia Anne & Thomas A. Cox P.O. Box 441 Collbran, CO 81624-0441 David L. Furr P.O. Box 186 De Beque, CO 81630 Harry Turner, et al. 102 Main Avenue, South Office 1 Twin Falls, ID 83301-6266 Jean Hart P.O. Box 1946 Rolla, MO 65402 Marie Young Irrevocable Trust c/o ICG P.O. Box 659 Wichita Falls, TX 76307 William and Archie R. Urquhart 619 Shadow Brook Drive Grand Junction, CO 81504 Paul Etcheverry P.O. Box 371 De Beque, CO 81630-0371 Joe Bob Neal 5716 Irving Blvd. NW Albuquerque, NM 87114-4724 L.W. & C.M. Tilton 828 S. Marvin Avenue Tucson, AZ 85710-4948 DUFFORD WALDECK ,MILBURN & KROHN LLP Attorneys at I_aw etty C. Bechtel Iilliam N.T. Frey lathan A. Keever ichard H. Krohn hristopher G. McAnany' aird T. Milburn lichael C. Santo am D.Starrittt lichael A. Kuzminski* :indy C. Lay ohn R. Pierce+ Villiam G. Waldeck etired lint B. Ogle tfCounsei ). J. Dufford 19191998) also Admitted in Oregon Also Admitted in Utah Also Admitted in Wyoming ERAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 744 Horizon Court Suite 300 Grand Junction Colorado 81506 TEL 970.241.5500 FAX 970.243.7738 MONTROSE. COLORADO TEL 970.249.4500 MOAB. UTAH TEL 435.259.2225 www.dwmk.com dwmk@dwmk.com September 19, 2005 Fred Jarman Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: High Lonesome Lodge Resort Special Use Permit Application Dear Fred: As you know, we have been working for an extended period on completing materials necessary for the County to consider the above application. I am enclosing a number of those documents with this letter. There are still a few more to be obtained, which are also outlined below. The d.or_.uments enclosed are as follows: 1. Floor plan drawings and color photographs of the buildings utilized for the lodge at the office/cookhouse/dining room, Guest House, Mckay Fork cabin, Homestead House cabin, Forshay cabin, and High Ranch cabin. 2. Legal descriptions for each of the properties utilized. 3. Tax parcel numbers and index map of the included townships from the Garfield County Assessor's Office. 4. Area map with map guide to #10 properties utilized in the resort operation and the types of uses made of each property (see further explanation below). Concerning the last item, we have discussed the fact that the properties utilized for High Lonesome Lodge are well in excess of 10,000 acres. This makes it extremely difficult to adequately display the entire property and the various uses made of it in connection with the Lodge operation. I have settled on the enclosed map and guide as the most effective way to do this on a single document. I will understand if you feel that some other or additional description or diagram would be helpful, and we will be happy to provide that to you upon request. Fred Jarman September 19, 2005 Page 2 There is no plan to install fences, landscape materials, lighting or signage to mitigate impacts upon neighboring property because of the lack of neighbors in the vicinity of the improvements utilized for the Lodge and the limited amount of traffic associated with the Lodge and the substantial acreage involved. The documents that I am aware that I have not provided to you are as follows: 1. We are still working on a list of neighboring owners, which is a substantial undertaking because of the recent decision that it would be necessary to include all of the #10 acreage under the umbrella of the Lodge application. I have my paralegal working on this project and hope to have this information to you within approximately a week or two. 2. I need to get to you the signed acknowledgment that we are authorized to act on behalf of the property owner and the application form and agreement to pay form. I have been unable to open the website to which you referred me for the latter two of these documents. I hope it might be possible for someone on your staff to mail copies to my paralegal, Vicki Warren, at our office, so that we can get them signed by our client. I will be out of the office until October 17, 2005. In the interim, my partner, Sam Starritt, will be able to address any issues that must be dealt with prior to my return. Otherwise, please let additional fo._...., and 1 need for application to e me know what 8uui�i51r2ai information materials yon may the .. considered complete, and I will promptly respond to your request upon my return. I appreciate your continuing cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, Richard H. Krohn RHK/saj Enclosures cc: Buzz Cox (High Lonesome Ranch) F:\SYS\Wp\8667 005Varman 2-LTR.wpd b 673_ Li v - rr, cr-3 ' Cr.) ECc, 4- ts- l" e c c. 4 cs. c-7.5 ~sy UJ 4 • /e/ -:t K f J\ p 0, T. \7 L r A 0 G1) 1/4 a, 4 rin cN • 4.40, i?S*1"1,s4t k 410,, 2 r-11 • - 1.\a.,•4 I • ' Ra4Aci.. DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: I09 8� Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 r•- PY %a G • ;incl Filed .�� .` j Ot 1 ii ♦ COURT USE ONLY 4 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF: #10 ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. IN THE COLORADO RIVER, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO John R. Pierce DUFFORD, WALDECK, MILBURN & KROHN, L.L.P. 744 Horizon Court, Suite 300 Grand Junction, CO 81506 Telephone: (970) 241-5500 Fax: (970) 243-7738 E-mail: dwnakedwmk.com Case Number: 02 CW 195 (Consolidated under 01 CW 063) Div.: Cum: Attorney Reg. #: 32365 AMENDED APFLJCeaTION FOR SURFACE RTGITTS- STORAGE PJGHTS UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Applicant, #I0 Enterprises, L.L.C., by and through its counsel, Duf ord, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, L.L.P., states its application as follows: I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name, Address, and Telephone Numbers of Applicant: #10 Enterprises, L.L.C., High Lonesome Lodge P.O. Box 88 • DeBeque, Colorado 81630 (970) 238-9420 AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 2 with copies of all pleadings to: John R. Pierce Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, L.L.P. 744 Horizon Court, Suite 300 Grand Junction, CO 81506 (970) 241-5500 II. APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER RIGHT (High Lonesome Spring Nos. 1 & 2) A. High Lonesome Spring No. 1: 1. Name of structure: High Lonesome Spring No. 1 2. Legal description of point of diversion: S W 14, S W'/a Section 26 T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SW Comer of Section 26 bears S 22'20'4" W, I, 108'. The High Lonesome Spring No. 1 is shown on the map attached as Exhibit A. 3. • Source: Springs and seeps tributary to the North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, Tributary to the Colorado River 4. Information regarding appropriation: a. Date of initiation of appropriation: 1980 b. How appropriation was initiated: By construction of system for collection and conveyance c. Date water applied to beneficial use: 1980 5. Amount claimed: .25 c.f.s., absolute. 6. Use: Domestic, piscatorial, commercial, wildlife, recreation, and for filing and continuous refilling of ponds. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 3 a. If irrigation, describe fully: Water from seeps and springs will be used for lawn and garden irrigation as described in Table 3, attached as Exhibit C, and described in Section V of this Application. b. If non -irrigation, describe purpose fully: Water from seeps and springs will be used to fill and maintain Rearing Pond #1, for domestic and commercial use as described in more detail in Section V(D)(1) of this Application. B. High Lonesome Spring No. 2: 1. Name of structure: High Lonesome Spring No. 2 2. Legal description of point of diversion: S W''/ , NE'/ Section 27 T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the NW Corner of Section 27 bears N 53°51'22" W, 3, 509'. The location of High Lonesome Spring #2 is shown on the map attached as Exhibit A. ?. Source: Springs and seeps tributary to the North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, Tributary to the Colorado River 4. Information regardin ation: a. Date of initiation of appropriation: 1969 b. How appropriation was initiated: By construction of system for collection and conveyance c. Date water applied to beneficial use: 1969 5. Amount claimed: .5 cis, absolute. 6. Use: Piscatorial, commercial, wildlife, recreation, and for filling and continuous refilling of ponds. a. If non -irrigation, describe purpose fully: Water from seeps and springs used to fill and maintain the Loveless Pond. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 4 C. Name and Address of Owner of Land on Which Points of Diversion and Place of Use Are Located: The structures described in this Section II of this Application are located on property owned by the Applicant. III. APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHT A. Name of Structure: Bowen Well No. 1 B. Permit number: 9338-F C. Legal description: The well is located in the SE'/ NW'/ of Section 10, T8S, R98W of the 6'h P.M. at a point whence the East Quarter Corner of said Section 10 bears S 83°07'51" E 3892.81 feet. D. Source and Depth: Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River; 81 feet E. 1. Date of appropriation: .nine 15, 2001 2. How appropriation was initiated: By field visit by Applicant's engineer to investigate use of well for purposes sought in this Application. 3. Date water applied to beneficial use: Upon approval of the Plan for Augmentation set out in this Application F. Amount Claimed: 1.32 c.f.s., absolute for augmentation, filling and refilling of ponds, wildlife, and recreation 1.32 c.f.s., conditional for domestic and commercial G. Proposed use: As an augmentation source, as well as for domestic, commercial, wildlife, recreation, and filling and continuously refilling ponds. Applicant may use the Bowen Well as an augmentation source during the late irrigation season. Applicant proposes to pump water from the Bowen Well, returning it directly to the stream. Due to the lag times discussed in Section V, below, 18% of the water pumped from the Bowen Well will not impact the Dry Fork during the month in which the pumping occurred. That proportion of the water pumped from the Bowen Well will be used for augmentation. Pumping activity will be timed so that the delayed impacts occur after the call is off. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 5 Because water diverted for augmentation under this plan will be immediately returned to the stream, the proposed use will be entirely non -consumptive. Operation of the proposed plan will not injure other vested or decreed water rights. 1-1. Name and address of owner of land on which well is located: The Bowen Well No. 1 is located on property owned by Applicant. IV. APPLICATION FOR STORAGE RIGHTS A. Name, Legal Description, Source, Date of Appropriation: Structure Legal Description Rearing Pond #1 Crossing Pond Loveless Pond LBF Reservoir SW 1/4, NE1/4 Section 6 T 8 S, R 98 vv', 6 P.N. at a point whence the NW Corner of Section 6 bears N 63°17'18" W, 3968' SE1/4, SW1/4 Section 26 T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SW Comer of Section 26 bears S 57°29'25" W, 2242' SW1/4, NE1/4 Section 27 T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the NW Comer of Section 27 bears N 57°54'11" W, 4172' NW1/4, SE1/4 Section 30 T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SE Corner of Section 30 bears S 53°37'55" E, 2426' Source North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River Date of Appropriation June 1, 1982 August 1, Luuz - Augmentation July 1, 1998 - all other uses set out below June 15, 1998 July 15, 1998 Upper Reservoir Pond Group No. 1 Pond Group No. 2 Pond, Group No. 3 AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 6 SE1/4, SE1/4 Section 23 T 7 S, R 100 W at a point whence the SE Corner of Section 23 bears S 76°56'46" E, 1144' The lower terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the NW1/4 NW1/4 Section 27, T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the NE Corner of Section 28 bears N 23°59'11" W, 1335'. The upper terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in SW1/4, NW1/4 Section 28, T 7 S, R 99 Wrr at a point whence the NE Corner of Section 28 bears N 58°40'12" E,5236' The lower terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the NE1/4, SW1/4 Section 29, T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SW Comer of Section 29 bears S50°44'06" W, 3353'. The upper terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the NW1/4, SE1 /4 Section 30, T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SE Comer of Section 30 bears S 52°07'16" E, 2644' The lower terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the SW1/4, SE'/ Section 23, T 7 S, R 100 W at a point whence the SE Corner of Section 23 bears S74° 12'41"W, 1791' . The Upper terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the SW1/4, SE '% Section 23, T 7 S, R 100 W at a point whence the SE corner of Section 23 bears S69° 12'40"E, 2435' North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River North Dry Fork; tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to Luc LUIV14LLV 1V VG1 North Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River June 1, 1996 June 15, 1999 June 15, 1999 June 15, 1999 AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 7 The location of each of the storage structures in Section IV of this Amended Application is illustrated on the map attached as Exhibit A. 13. Amount Claimed Use Surface Area Total Ca ac Amount Surface Total Area Capacity Structure Claimed Use Rearing Pond #1 5.0 Piscatorial, wildlife, 0.5 5.0 recreation Crossing Pond 15.0 Piscatorial, wildlife, 2.3 15.0 recreation, augmentation Loveless Pond 2.5 Piscatorial, wildlife, 0.5 2.5 recreation LBF Reservoir 20.0 Piscatorial, wildlife, 4.1 20.0 recreation Upper Reservoir 6.0 Piscatorial, wiidiife, i.4 6.0 recreation Pond Group No. 1 28.0 Piscatorial, wildlife, 5.6 28.0 recreation Pond Group No. 2 20.0 Piscatorial, wildlife, 4.0 20.00 recreation Pond Group No. 3 2.0 Piscatorial, wildlife, 0.4 2.0 recreation C. Names and Addresses of Owners of Land on Which Structures for the Water Right is Located: The structures described in this section are all located on lands owned by the Applicant. V. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION A. Name of Structures to be Augmented: The structures to be augmented are those structures described in Sections II, III, and IV of this Application, as well as the Furr Ponds when operating under the Plan for Augmentation set out below utilizing water rights from the Reservoir Ditch Priority No. 21. 13. Previous Decree for Water Rights to be Used for Augmentation: AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 8 Previous decree for Purr Ponds: a. Date entered: 95CW134 — March 20, 1995 (conditional) 01CW063 — Pending (absolute) b. Court: District Court, Water Division No. 5 c. Type of water right: Storage d. Each of the ponds is located in Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. The distance of the center of each pond from the south and east section lines of said Section 10 is as follows: Distance From Distance From Pond No. South Section Line East Section Line 1 3030 2150 2 3065 1940 3 2950 1675 4 3170 1780 5 2820 1465 6 2720 1600 7 2810 1290 8 2680 1060 9 2420 850 10 2225 840 11 2220 590 12 1950 840 13 1815 700 14 1980 785 15 1700 520 16 1580 540 17 1465 425 18 1615 290 19 1480 100 e. Source: Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River; AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 9 f. Amount for each pond as previously decreed: (Note: The following surface areas reflect actual as -built pond capacities, These capacities have already been provided in Case No. 01CW063 and are based upon a survey conducted in February, 2002.) Pond No. Surface Area Amount 1 1.1 Acre 2.08 AF 2 0.25 Acre 0.31 AF 3 0.34 Acres 2.1 AF 4 1.22 Acres 3.99 AF 5 1.87 Acre 5.98 AF 6 0.59 Acre 2.75 AF 7 1.23 Acres 1.05 AF 8 0.88 Acre 3.72 AF 9 1.64 Acres 3.83 AF 10 1.12 Acres 2.54 AF 11 1.78 Acres 6.56 AF 12 1.59 Acres 6.11 AF 13 0.71 Acre 3.75 AF 14 0.96 Acre 0.88 AF 15 0.72 Acre 2.08 AF 16 0.23 Acre 0.44 AF 17 0.59 Acre 1.57 AF 18 1.03 Acres 4.09 AF 19 1.15 Acre 4.6 AF g. h. Appropriation: March 1, 1995 Decreed uses: Storage, irrigation, livestock watering, domestic, piscatorial, wet lands creation, wildlife watering, evaporation losses, augmentation and exchange purposes, and fire protection. 2. Previous decree for Bowen Well: a. Date entered: The Bowen Well was originally decreed for irrigation purposes in Case No. W-1231in 1972. Applicant seeks an additional water right for augmentation purposes in Section III of this Application. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 10 b. Case No.: W-1231 c. Court: District Court, Water Division No. 5 d. Type of water right: Underground e. Legal description: The well is located in the SEI/4NW 1/4 of Section 10, T8S, R98W of the 6'h P.M. at a point whence the East Quarter Corner of said Section 10 bears S 8307'51" E 3892.81 feet; f Source: Dry Fork, tributary to Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River g. Amount decreed: 1.32 c.f.s., absolute h. Appropriation: July 12, 1965 i. Decreed use: Irrigation 3. Previous Decree for Crossing Pond: Applicant seeks a storage right for the Crossing Pond in Section IV of this Application. Previous Decree for Reservoir Ditch. Priority No. 21: a. Date entered: May 11, 1889 b. Case No.: W-3102 c. Court: Water Court for what is now Water Division No. 5 d. Type of water right: Surface. e. Legal description of points of diversion: The headgate for the Reservoir Ditch is located on the west bank of Roan Creek at a point about 4 miles above the mouth, on the NE1/4 NE1/4 of Section 18, Township 8 South, Range 97 West of the 6th P.M. Source: Roan Creek, tributary to the Colorado River AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page I I g. Amount: 6.00 c.f.s. h. Appropriation: February 28, 1884 i. Decreed use: Irrigation 5. Previous decree for Wolford Mountain Reservoir: The Colorado River Water Conservation District owns and operates Wolford Mountain Reservoir (f/k/a Gunsight Pass Reservoir) which has the following water rights. a. Case No. 87CW283: November 1 989 i. Decree Date: 20, _ �°� ii. Legal description of place of storage: The dam is located in the SWI/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 25, T. 2 N., R. 8 i W., 6th P.M. The intersection of the dam axis with the right abutment will occur at a point which bears W. 54°5420" E. a distance of 3,716.46 feet from the NW Corner of said Section 25. iii. Source: Muddy Creek and its tributaries iv. Amount: 59,993 acre feet conditional; of this amount, 32,986 acre feet were made absolute for piscatorial and recreational uses by decree entered in Water Court Case No. 95CW251. v. Appropriation Date: December 14, 1987 vi. Use: All beneficial uses, including but not limited to domestic, municipal, agricultural and recreational uses, which uses satisfy the requirements of the Windy Gap Settlement made with the Municipal Subdistrict of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District; use to meet the water requirements of the inhabitants of the River District for all uses, including uses in the Middle Park area; and use to meet the terms of a lease agreement executed March 3, 1987 between the River District and the City and County of Denver. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 12 b. Case No. 95CW281: Decree Date: August 26, 1997 ii. Legal description of place of storage: The dam is located in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 25, T. 2 N., R. 81 W., 6th P.M. The as -built intersection of the dam axis (Sta. D19+35.61) with the West Access Road (Sta. WR50+55.05), as shown on the Colorado River Water Conservation District, Wolford Mountain Project, Ritschard Dam construction drawing "Dimensional Dam Layout" sheet 8 of 94, occurs at a point which bears S. 53°24'56" E. a distance of 3,395.51 feet from the NW Corner of said Section 25; Sta. 19 3c 61 to Sta 0+00 being the bearing of said dam axis from , � .�.�. S. 75° 28' 29" E. iii. Source: Muddy Creek and its tributaries iv. Amount: 6,000 acre feet conditional v. Appropriation Date: January 16, 1995 vi. Use: All beneficial uses by and for the benefit of the inhabitants of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, including but not limited to domestic, municipal, industrial, irrigation, agricultural, piscatorial and recreational; such uses will include environmental mitigation, including environmental mitigation requirements associated with the Wolford Mountain Project; such uses will be made directly or by substitution, augmentation, or exchange. None of the water stored in the exercise of the right will be delivered directly or by exchange, substitution, or otherwise for use outside of Colorado Water Division No. 5. e. Case No. 98CW237: i. Decree Date: July 6, 2000. ii. Legal Description of place of storage: Same as for 95CW281. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 13 iii. Source: Muddy Creek and its tributaries iv. Amount: 30,000 acre feet conditional with 15,895 AF being absolute for recreational and piscatorial and flood control. v. Appropriation Date: November 17, 1998 vi, Use: Certain of the beneficial uses previously adjudicated for Wolford Mountain Reservoir in Case No. 87CW283, District Court for Colorado Water Division No. 5 (November 20, 1989 Judgment and Decree), and Case No. 95CW281, District Court for Colorado Water Division No. 5 (August 26, 1997 Judgment and Decree). vii. 87CW283: The reservoir will be used to satisfy the requirements of the Windy Gap Settlement made with the iviunicipai Subdistrict of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. This will involve all uses, including but not limited to domestic, municipal, agricultural, and recreational uses. The reservoir will also be used to meet the water requirements of the inhabitants of the River District for all uses, including uses in the Middle Park area. viii. 95CW281: All beneficial uses by and for the benefit of the inhabitants of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, including but not limited to domestic, municipal, industrial, irrigation, agricultural, piscatorial and recreational; such uses will include environmental mitigation, including environmental mitigation requirements associated with the Wolford Mountain Reservoir Project; such uses will be made directly or by substitution, augmentation, or exchange. ix. Remarks: The Refill Right described herein will be exercised to provide supply for the Western Slope uses of water from Wolford Mountain Reservoir described above, including flood control, other operational purposes, and environmental mitigation and enhancement for the benefit of uses within the District. The Refill Right will not be used in conjunction with the Reservoir capacity AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 14 (24,000 a.f.) which is allocated for the supply of water to the Denver Board of Water Commissioners under Applicant's contractual relationship with Denver, or the Reservoir capacity (6,000 AF) which is allocated for Colorado River endangered fish releases. C. Historic use: The Furr Ponds have been used for piscatorial purposes. The Bowen Well has been used for irrigation since July 12, 1965. The Reservoir Ditch Priority No. 21 has been used for irrigation since February 28, 1884. D. Statement of Plan for Augmentation: Applicant will divert water from Dry Fork in priority to fill and continuously refill Furr Ponds Nos. 1 - 19 and the Crossing Pond. Water stored in priority in Furr Ponds 1-19 and the Crossing Pond will be held for future of of the Furr Ponds 1 - 19 and release to augment out o� priority- u�Y.�«��,�.The capacity v. the Crossing Pond is sufficient to address augmentation needs, however, Applicant may elect to address late season augmentation needs with water obtained from the Bowen Well as described below. Additionally. as an alternative to the above-described plan for augmentation using the Furr Ponds, the Crossing Pond, and the Bowen Well, Applicant may augment out of priority depletions using 0.5 c.f.s. of water rights in the Reservoir Ditch, Priority No. 21, the senior calling right on Roan Creek. The 0.5 c.f.s. right in the Reservoir Ditch is sufficient to address augmentation needs within the Roan Creek basin. With regard to the Colorado River (Cameo Call), to the extent that depletions exceed the consumptive use credits associated with Applicant's Reservoir Ditch right, Applicant will provide augmentation water from Wolford Mountain Reservoir leased from the Colorado River Water Conservation District. 1. Consumptive uses: a. Domestic and Commercial uses: Water will be diverted for domestic and commercial purposes as set forth on Table 3, attached as Exhibit E. Uses for the single family residences, guesthouse, guide cabin, and hunting cabin are domestic. Uses for the Cookhouse/Office are commercial. In-house water use has been described on an EQR (Equivalent Residential unit) basis to account for the various types of uses. Lawn irrigation, totaling an estimated 16,000 square feet is associated with the structures and is included in Table 3, attached as AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 15 Exhibit E. The annual domestic water system depletion is 1.79 acre feet, of which 1.48 acre feet occurs during the irrigation season. The irrigation consumptive use summarized below was determined using the Blaney-Criddle methodology modified for use with the Pochop turf grass growth stage coefficients and elevation adjustments. The analysis is summarized. in Table 4, attached as Exhibit F. b. Evaporative losses: Applicant will maintain the water levels in the augmented structures described in Section IV of this Application. That practice will result in out -of -priority evaporative depletions from the surface of those ponds during portions of the irrigation season. The surface area for those ponds is set forth in Table 1, attached as Exhibit C. Calculations of annual evaporative depletions are shown in Table 2, attached as Exhibit D. Total evaporative depletions for the augmented ponds during the irrigation season (April - October) equals 104.1 acre-feet. c. Operation of plan: Applicant will store water in priority in the Furr Ponds 1-19 and the Crossing Pond for future release to offset out - of -priority evaporative depletions from the augmented structures described in this Application, as well as domestic and commercial consumption from the structures described in Section II. The total annual depletions from evaporation, domestic use, and commercial use equals 116.4 acre-feet. Total depletions when the Furr Ponds 1-19 and the Crossing Pond are used as augmentation sources equals 47.5 acre feet. The Furr Ponds 1-19 and the Crossing Pond have the capacity to store 73.4 acre-feet of water to be released for augmentation. Thus, releases from the Fun Ponds will fully offset Applicant's depletions from the augmented structures in this Application. Bowen Well. Additionally, Applicant may choose to provide augmentation water from the Bowen Well No. 1. A Glover analysis was used to determine delayed stream impacts from seasonal augmentation pumping from the Bowen Well. The well is a shallow (81 feet) alluvial well located 150 feet from the stream. The aquifer parameters used in the analysis were: AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 16 • Alluvial aquifer type Distance to impervious boundary = 850 feet Distance to stream = 150 feet T = 25,000 d/ft S = 0.2; The analysis indicates that the lag time between pumping and the depletions to the Dry Fork is as follows: Delayed Pumping Impacts Bowen Well No. 1 Month 1 2 3 Stream Impact (as % of month 1 pumping) 82% 16% 3% Diversions from the Bowen Well will be placed directly into the stream. Diversions in excess of the immediate stream depletions will be used as an augmentation supply. To the extent that lagged depletions continue outside the call period, the lagged depletions do not need to be augmented. Because of the lag time, when the well is used it takes up to three months for the impact to be fully felt by the stream. For example, if 10 acre-feet are pumped in September, the stream will receive a net gain of 1.8 acre-feet. In the event that lagged depletions are out of priority longer than anticipated, the well will continue to be pumped to the stream until the call is off. Reservoir Ditch, Priority No. 21. Finally, under this Plan, Applicant may provide 0.5 c.f.s. of augmentation water from the Reservoir Ditch, Priority No. 21. The Reservoir Ditch, Priority No. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 17 21 is the senior water right in the lower Roan Creek basin and the only water right in the basin located downstream of Applicant that is not subject to being called. When there is a call on Roan Creek the amount of water diverted at the Reservoir Ditch under Priority No. 21 will be reduced by an amount equal to Applicant's Dry Fork depletions as shown in Table 5, attached as Exhibit G. The maximum out -of -priority depletion occurs in July, and is 0.36 c.f.s. The foregone diversion amount will then be available to satisfy the calling water right. Colorado Mainstem Augmentation. The Applicant's depletions exceed the consumptive use credit available under the leased Priority No. 21 water right. To make the Colorado River (Cameo Call) whole, the Applicant has leased storage ,. pater in Wolford Mountain Reservoir from the Colorado River Water Conservation District. This will supplement Applicant's Reservoir Ditch consumptive use credit. The Reservoir Ditch consumptive use credit available to Applicant has been determined to be 68.1 acre feet per year distributed monthly as shown in Table 7, attached as Exhibit I. Under the lease of the Reservoir Ditch Priority No. 21, 38 acres historically irrigated under the ditch will be dried up (Figure 2). The 38 acres is illustrated on the map attached as Exhibit B. The historical consumptive use of Priority No. 21 water on this land has been determined based on an SCS TR 21 Blaney-Criddle irrigation consumptive use analysis (Table 6, attached as Exhibit H), with reduction for dry year water availability as presented in Table 7, attached as Exhibit I. The amount of Wolford water available in a given month when there is a mainstem call is equal to the Applicant's monthly depletion minus the Reservoir Ditch consumptive use credit increased by 10% to account for the Division Engineer's assessed transit losses. The projected Wolford releases are shown in Table 8, attached as Exhibit J. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SURFACE RIGHTS, STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION Page 18 Respectfully submitted this 2 7day of December, 2002. DUFFORD, WALDECK, MILBURN & KROHN, L.L.P. : BY Pierce, #32365 ys for Applicant John Att.L STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF MESA VERIFICATION I, John Currier, Engineer for #10 Enterprises, L.L.C., state under oath that I have read this Application and verify its content. Currier Subscribed under oath before me on this My commission expires: day of __aZ/21 Lt1 . 2002. . Nab -3 ,10(2-5- o 12 �F. , 1 LAND UNDER RESERVOIR DITCH TO BE DRIED UP. LOCATED IN THE NW1/4, AND NE1/4 OF SECTION 20 AND THE SW1/4, AND SE1/4 OF SECTION 17 T 8 S, R 97 W OF.THE SIXTH P.M. "38 ACRE PARCEL". .,:.: �'� ,.4..: bye 1 rt "`V ��jpk `F'2J (k"' N 1 gtr, z. VinJp S 1h vh y}.14e9it'4-Lt :mivii : DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2002 JOB NUMBER 848-1 3 " CHECKED BY: JMC SCALE. 1" = 800' "`�°`RESOU INC. Unocal 0 • aMVOs. $761601 • a% OM 1.46-4a7a DRY-UP UNDER RESERVOIR DITCH EXHIBIT ���6® ma Pi “EmNGINEERING. W 97t 94 µE (ppj 0}-S1ll TABLE 1 #10 Enterprises, LLC Fork Ponds to be Augmented Description Surface Volum On Source (if Off -Channel Filling Legal Description Area e (AF) Channel Rate (If (Acres) or Off- Off- Channel channel), (cfs) Bearing Pond # 1 0.5 5.0 Off Seeps and Springs tributary to the N. Dry Fork (High Lonesome Spring No. 1) 0.25 114 6 Section SWS R 98W,P.M.ata point whence the NW Corner of Section 6 bearsN 6317'18'W, 3968' Crossing Pond 2.3 15.0 On SE1/4, SW1/4 Section26 T 7 S, R99 W at a point whence the SW Comer of Section 26 bearsS 57°29'25'W, 2247 Loveless Pond .5 2.5 Off Seeps and Springs tributary to the N. Dry Fork (High Lonesome Spring No. 2) 0.5 S7IS, R 1/4, 1/4 tSection Tntwhence theNVit comer of 99W a Secfion 27 bears N57°54'11' 1'W, 4177 LBF Reservoir 4.1 20.0 On NWI/4, SEI/4 Section 30 T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SE Corner of Section 30 bears S53°3755"E, 2426' Upper Reservoir 1.4 6.0 On SE1/4, SEI/4 Section 23 T 7 S, R 100 W at a point whence the SE Comer of Section 23 bears 576°56'46"E, 1144' Pond Group Nn. t --. 1 5.6 28.0 On The tower terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the NW1/4, NW1/4 Section 27, 7 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the NE Comer of Section 28 bears N23°59'11'W, 1335' The upper terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in SW1/4, NW1/4 Section 28, T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the NE Comer of Section 28 bears N58°4d17E, 5236' Pond Group No. 2 4.0 20.0 On The lower terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the NE1/4, SW114 Section 29, T 7 S, R9 99 W at a point whence the SW Comer of Section 29 bears S50°44'06', 3353' The upper terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the NWI/4, SE1/4 Section 30, T 7 S, R 99 W at a point whence the SE Comer of Section Section 30 bears S57071 6"E, 2644' Pond Group No. 3 .4 2.0 On The lower terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the SW1/4, SE1/4 Section 23, T 7 S, R100 W at a point whence the SE Comer of Section 23 bears S741741"W, 1791' The upper terminus of the pond group is at a point on the N. Dry Fork in the SW1/4, SEI/4 Section 23, T 7 5, R 100 W at a point whence the SE Corner of Section 23 bears 569°12'40"E, 2435' TOTAL 18.8 98.5 EXHIBIT 1 ■ TABLE 2 EVAPORATION FROM #10 ENTERPRISES PONDS Located on the Dry Fork and N.Dry Fork of Roan Creek (3) 4 5 6 MONTH lV GROSS EVAP. RATE (INCHES) ,_ AVERAGE PRECIP. (INCHES) EFFECTIVE PRECIP. (INCHES) NET EVAP. RATE (INCHES) NET EVAP FOR TOTAL POND AREA (AF) NET EVAP AFTER ADJUST - MENT FOR ICE (AF) JANUARY 1.31 0.64 0.45 0.86 2.7 ' 0.00 FEBRUARY 1.44 0.54 0.38 1.06 3.4 0.72 MARCH 2.03 0.75 0.53 1.50 4.8 4.75 APRIL 3.02 0.71 _ 0.50 2.52 8.0 7.97 MAY 4.05 0.76 0.53 3.52 11.1 11.14 JUNE 6.03 0.44 0.31 5.72 18.1 18.12 JULY 7.16 0.47 0.33 6.83 21.6 21.62 AUGUST 6.84 0.91 0.64 6.20 _ 19.6 19.64 SEPTEMBER 5.45 0.70 0.49 4.96 15.7 15.69 OCTOBER 3.74 0.87 0.61 3.13 9.9 9.90 NOVEMBER 2.43 0.63 0.44 1.99 6.3 5.08 DECEMBER 1.53 0.58 0.41 1.12 3.6 0.00 TOTAL 45.00 8.00 5.60 _ 39.40 124.8 114.6 APR -OCT 36.27 4.86 3.40 32.87 104.1 104.1 NOV-APR Flovatinn_ Gross Annual Evaral Evaporation Pond or Lake Suri Surface Area: 18.52 5700 Feet 45 inches 38 Acres (19 acres on N. Dry Fork + 19 acres of Furr Ponds) Column Explanations: Column 1: Gross evaporation determination based on NOAA Technical Report NWS 33, Evaporation Alias For The Contiguous 48 United States using the isopleths of annual shallow lake evaporation for the State of Colorado. The monthly distribution of evaporation is from the General Criteria for Substitute Water Supply Plans and Augmentation Plans for Sand and Gravel Pits Submitted to the State Engineer Pursuant to SB 120 (1989). Column 2: Precipitation data is for Grand Junction Column 3: Effective precipitation = 70% X Column 2. Column 4: Column 1 - Column 3. Column 5: Net evaporation for pond surface area based on the net evaporation rate in column 4. Column 6: The Ponds are assumed frozen from the date the mean temperature reaches 32 degrees in the Fall until the mean temperature warms to 32 degrees in the Spring (Nov 25 - Feb 22). Average monthly temperature data for the weather station GRAND JUNCTION 6ESE for the years 1962 -1999 (elevation: 4620) was used as the basis for the average monthly temperatures on the N. Dry Fork of Roan Creek The Grand Junction data was adjusted downward by 3.6 degrees F. for every 1,000 feet of elevation difference between Grand Junction and the N. Dry Fork. The elevation in the N. Dry Fork is 6,000 feet Therefore the downward adjustment was 4.97 degrees. EXHIBIT 24 -Dec -02 Resource Engineering, Inc. pondevap.gpw TABLE 3 #10 Enterprises Domestic Water System Water Demand (acre feet) Month Total Demand Consumptive Use In-house Lawn Irrigation TOTAL Domestic In-house Lawn Irrigation TOTAL January 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.04 0.00 0.04 February 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.03 0.00 0.03 March 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.08 0.00 0.08 April 0.54 0.09 0.63 0.08 0.08 0.16 May 0.56 0.14 030 0.08 0.11 0.20 June 0.54 0.20 0.74 0.08 0.16 0.24 July 0.56 0.22 0.78 0.08 0.18 0.26 August 0.56 0.17 0.73 0.08 0.14 0.22 September 0.54 0.13 0.67 0.08 0.10 0.18 October 0.56 0.08 0.63 0.08 0.06 0.14 November 0.54 0.00 0.54 0.08 0.00 0.08 December 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.08 0.00 0.08 TOTALS -> 5.98 1.03 7.01 0.90 0.82 1.72 Apr 1 - Oct 30 3.85 1.03 4.87 0.58 0.82 1.40 it of EQR's # personslEQR # gallons/EDP/day % CU for ISDS systems Sq. Ft. of Lawn Irrigated % Lawn Irrig. Efficiency EQR Summary Description Single Family Residence Guest house Cookhouse / Office / Pro Shop Guide Cabin Hunting Cabin Total 7.5 3.5 100 15 16000 80 Unit Count EQR/Unit 4 1 EQR's 4 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 2 0.25 0.5 7.5 24 -Deo -02 Resource Engineering, Inc. EXHIBIT E 1mnslk.wtjS cF OnQ) CO l' -- w �cOp Or ' v Z ..� CO •ct a) IN IA VC C t-- -- 01 w do N� ta� O O[D co `-d -03 CS O UCN o0..-NOO el`Oat•"O C`;x`"'0000 OOOf O. N W d c °:v¢rn oro R... m 'o N N d'O C h- L '5 U c 4n Q' OroOhLt• thh�- N sQ d U C E ... p) /5 o M d' 0040 1`- M O a t U ` y. •nOa) 4.1 2kr:'6000 OO O c4O W Upip_..... N- `- ca. tZ N N+.u) aN p..3 _ �CDdt- .Kw E C 75 ¢ N;ca .N 0.o.ao a) > •'4.0o � � cSh<tvrnr:w.v: wo�"0000000vo EomO - d a) a_ L c- z O w .o N E W o a o tro N O m O. t`6 O to c N N N O i-• O(DM fa OO hr -r MS •C) o O N > "' (`6 ucDi� g W -o whoa ao1. :o.0 o y o c O 0.a) v t+f V7 aJ N (O 'd" M M 0 E c 3 U •.F+ 0 E O CL T O 0 '�Q f� O= N A AG V L a C (n N C to b� `` Ici7¢l co coT$iE 0^m00maWF .an,� U o 0 0 0 o 0 o S W m i....... --,m m U W N -B a) iiiz U- N fs t' L u tJ.l • a) '._ V' V' h tom- h. 7 d' 1- j/)'Gy w O MNM OO N o Y" CD 4j D) E O o O O O O O v_ > ... lila U, OT-rr•<-C-V-o ,lea S L ):ES ' 0 ti E v 15 m v0 O W o of A� N C'O d'C C E VYCr - YOCo L� [O) �'` c �w a C9 c as o N E V o °' a o C ,...it i U C c w L Q ... c 25 N ._ M M ... M O ..._. R U O L .., v Q._ 5 oforNo)N. oi� R 'o(, o J a) o v o D 0 ca •r- 6i .— .,-- i� •o m o a o. o t- 2 o' d r o p z E tn'.- N o ='C a). (, m o o a 0 d N W =0 3.c ti) V O C Y O T 09 0- uor1hr-rMo o�mc �j�ia 0 ao L a) E of O W r0 M d' of a d' c �- ` 2 V N 0 C g 'ttntot-hcoLfl o ami�«a) O w o o z o 3), ow CO c 1- 0 - cts E .« '- o V w c 0[] avvdi Qmmm=e.n0o 7.8 "._ Ua o o WFin c U O N U C w L z 0 C 0 t6 O N V- O N C00MMM MMMVT � N j TABLE 5 #10 Enterprises Total Depletions (acre feet) Month Domestic Pond Evaporation Total (acre-feet) Total (cfs) January 0.04 0.00 . 0.04 0.00 February 0.03 0.72 0.75 0.01 March 0.08 4.75 4.83 0.08 April 0.16 7.97 8.13 0.14 May 0.20 11.14 11.34 0.18 June 0.24 18.12 18.36 0.31 July 0 26 21.62 21.87 0.36 August 0.22 19.64 19.86 0.32 September 0.18 15.69 15.87 0.27 October 0.14 9.90 10.04 0.16 November 0.08 5.08 5.16 0.09 December 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 TOTALS -> 1.72 114.63 116.35 Apr 1 - Oct 30 4 Fn i .Yu 104 09 105 43 I Domestic Depletions from Tahle 3 Pond Evaporation Depletions from Table 2 24 -Dec -02 Resource Engineering, Inc. EXHIBIT 1G ) r r d it T- Z g CD ac r X m La a. fl-.--. 11); N • d 4"E' CO FO U O P O D e O D O +th CO ON SON O O>rr0)tI L0 N O C � r r N N r� o _••OF W o C m O t.,, ter.. N Ell?: 00N CO O) CO N 00 rN SD0'0 tOtO r N SOON OSO « a. N ✓ (O SO CO CO' r NN CO v O s N O 0. 0) v r f6 N 00 Y •tam V•SANO Nm N O. 1= c N rOO Or M rO vC m = W CJ OOOOOO r 0 gy!O O (0 T E O ' r-. - .0 d O w..m.. c a . m N # N O' W t- W m 0. d 10• 00000 O t0 am m@ W ly m 0 W • c Q F '�.0 O O c Cly 2 ✓ (O4NrON (0r V 3-0 U (O E c Nti'� 4t m N00 CO V: �a W O c O O C S O O O O 't o N a 0 w C` tW- C tc6 O SA O O 0 W mt9- 6..--. N - 0) 0) r r.. r m 04 CO N 4?071.0 W 43 Or'C N Tr0 M - C• a) v (V v (o oo t•-:4 ei a°▪ 0 CL Nt`00 Om CO f.r.i y 0 Y I- C T W a cc 0 2 (00)00 CO r (00) g m O r r 0 0) d 6 -r —r0 CU Q (0i 0. m O ^ m CC re 01- 0 a� III a CD goo 6)co. NN VO•'M 0 600 .2m-. N 000)m OO adN = rr m 0 N N ✓ p O m W Nan a CI 0to m r N N 00 N O W N . Nc N G 1 000)00) 00) tO to W,•,,N C N N 00cn O) O d70J h- co T 02-- E-- TD co _ CO W j tiC O c W E E t!) M ti rhM O U t 002 RL.c Oi0)0(OM4CV cr N C I.-. N et t0 (O N N (O to U Q CO O 2h F - v 1— m E 8UU co o �ow(A Q lW6 7 t„.: 0 0 0 W O �c m W » rnCoa.O`'0EU- E O 006w 0 rvd 6a) Na0, 0 ma —c O ror r'Or o • M CO CO f7C)c7 O V' W � m T co `a 3S rn0 o :6 EXHIBIT File: No10 tr21T1.wb3, Job 848-1.3 RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. 0 U W t. Table 7 Historical Consumptive Use Under Reservoir Ditch Priority No. 21 Dry -up 2 3 4 Month Consumptive Irrigation Requirement (C.I.R.) (inches) C.I.R. for dryup acreage (acre-feet) Dry Yr Irrigation Water Available to meet C.I.R. (acre-feet) C.I.R. met by available irrigation water (acre-feet) April 1.58 5.0 11.3 5.0 May 3.57 11.3 11.7 11.3 June 613 19.4 11.3 11.3 July 8.29 26.3 11.7 11.7 August 6.63 21.0 11.7 11.7 September 4.02 12.7 11.3 11.3 October 1.78 5.6 11.7 5.6 Total 32.0 101.4 80.9 68.1 f Dryup Acreage: 38 acres Pdority No. 21 Water Dedicated to Dryup: 0.5 cfs Dry Yr water availability (as % of normal year): 67% Ditch conveyance Ions 5% Maximum Field Application Efficiency: 60% Column Explanations: 1) The net irrigation requirement from column 11, Table 6 (Consumptive Irrigation Requirement. 2) Column 1 X dryup acreage converted to acre-feet. 3) Total monthly diversion based on the face value of the water right dedicated to the plan then adjusted downward by dry year water availability, ditch conveyance loss and maximum field application efficiency. 4) The lesser of the C.I.R. or the water available to meet the C.I.R. This is the consumptive use credit claimed under the water right. 12124t2002 Resource Engineering, Inc. Table 8 Wolford Mountain Reservoir Release Requirement (all values in acre -fee ) 1 2 3 4 5 Month CU credit available from Reservoir Ditch dryup Total Depletions Depletions met from storage Storage Requirement with 10% conveyance loss Release Requirement based on probable Cameo call regime Jan 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 Feb 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.00 Mar 0.00 4.83 4.83 5.31 1.33 Apr 5.01 8.13 3.12 3.43 1.72 May 11.32 11.34 0.02 0.02 . 0.02 Jun 11.34 18.36 7.02 7.72 7.72 Jul 11.72 21.87 10.15 11.16 11.16 Aug 11.72 19.86 8.14 8.95 8.95 Sep 11.34 15.87 4.53 4.98 4.98 Oct 5.65 10.04 4.39 4.83 4.83 Nov 0.00 5.16 5.16 5.68 2.84 Dec 0.00 0,08 0.08 0.09 0.00 Tv ai 68.1 116.1 48.2 53.1 43S Column Explanations: 1) Irrigation Consumptive Use credit available from the dryup under the Reservoir Ditch. Column 4, Table 7. 2) The Applicant's total depletions. From Table 5 3) Column 2 - column 1 4) A 10% conveyance loss is added to the reservoir release requirement to allow for losses between Wolford Mountain Reservoir and DeBeque. 5) Probable release requirement based on a critical dry year call running the last week of March through mid-April and from June 1 through November 15. EXHIBIT 12/24/2002 Resource Engineering, Inc. II Is NERESOURGE S8B8 '3O�J�JO E909 COLOPN A •� D G. INC. (970) 9K-9717 • nix (979) W }12r eiw� #10 ENTERPRISES LLC, HIGH LONESOME LODGE NORTH DRY FORK WATER RIGHTS LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A FIGURE 1 8 101 W 71 R 1001N 150 30' ( diOUGLAS PASS) 72 R 99 W 1 175 1 200 73 R98 W Rf/ ar- 1411,irr�=--- -cr-c-cf 7» cy ' r. 5 1 �.a llINZE�[7IIB� �i l��® mi[� i1- 16'6 }!!t r �� �� ��III'/ ����y�//ry/////p yr �l r i�l�I' /fi •J/� P�� y�/ //fl� 14�/„ t v m /�\/i� ��/ c ,�j tzo rept ®�'g19 ^ ) �� ///p ..tom •i, (i. r 1� j/'��/,�,�l/f u y yy�-��wjj/��': Iv „ in/`A '`� "36�. �-•-� J Imo, /J" J \ / ",/'L� `� P'V •. �= -1.7 Yr-alL17Ri5s ' C \ 1•77-551211680 . �q,J fly (-4 �-' l r /'/� ) f Witsk _11 j ��ii \% i� \t yy \�,`\�`am, 1;1:v47-Ana ../_y 4 tHN \\,,.,-NtSim-i\tv,,,___,,,.,., \It \I lr�, A\\V\ \ it • • `, _ ': l .3 t. . \ /�\` L� \��� ems_ .� �s� i C� I (i CEi {%,ir �Q �� � is,, A '"'"'l %/�//fir �' �� v1 ,v .,\ a., ,a -v C fig, � i7l �1I,/ ` A\AZT' is n:�. .�JJ►//N'/moi✓✓ I�/G as "G� 111 ' ' Ariniglia tirr V� �1 / '�° Y�\� �;J ° tai ��ridtJJG�ul1i z Ara a, r o a h p° i�n m!. �. t4 d 1�! ® t1R .i �. H I / ... `ry�r/ l� eir �f�Vlit7 . 1i/ IC� ^='s�Sde6 l'�J �tir-�; re,ill G@.., mo\IIi{ i ��i%i'M.,� •I AnNL 7 Vl` ,i/ jf! n4 �P/,J,.� `� algal* a �\---y 1��1 1 P25: _� �/ r 11 �� ji 1,vuir'1247-341 \ tI�/N L '� //� 19.' 7 YIL'f/ •' ��I fY!l�l ♦ I � F'/ i 4� \\)f//! —, ( / 6 s I�i___ .�L� SFS �� 'itL. \N ave-- /' A M nay y>_�..,7-1 a S r Tee !�17��� ��n,.r► \Y CA ter r� U vl \•jj1 vr��1 �.s �.I, • ■ ‘,...z)., =,'" ) / N fl/lil Al -2-VIEW204111.. EMI \k /76sie �H'oa � ,//,/�Y .-l/// / n 7 i,t, AA G' RFI ELt_ .O .%1� .lam >. , � _; i . (/// 7/1'5. A-`l::,i 7 -y ,... C � .♦oar. It nES ( B � A� 2 r! "i `--,A, 6cl, �.,/ a, > a. ��0 1 �7 7_I 1. if/ f/ T ,1 - ./_. � 2. •'\.22.,,,,,„:-.,N,.lf"1 U I '-� v r ,lll,o r \, -, t� _[C /7 / d i _�sh '�.-._, '\J,v - �� / Vii`-. , \> / ..:--1 `11l,p rcJt' /' ''_�,.i ;u °'�—� 1) le w1 /, ■ ��„ l� i '� % `�\ �''\ i Ly ,,,., f"- %u / �✓' 206 ✓'V "� ,i�d L �i �' P4.275a a 6aAield ),-" .. ` \ / '2g/ Z� 1, '7 . ,.. �;� 2C-' .-•• �. 2v �/,l �..., 17— 7k, I1� '�+' n_ , /:.win P 2 1 \ 1'>. ,. v „n— ^ �a .�,,...._^ 'il____ ! 1 / (/ fePi >;`V /.,�}� "`'-_Sr) ,.r �rG.'_7 ..=-a-,. 0,/50{78 lgsa -�-' \n `I �.^ / ��—, .� i�J \1 �� ,•r !i vn v / P2`�.V ( / _l t�a}9 �' f 8 � / '9�j', 2 ... / `i ,^j 4 1 I I Ii itit-+ 1 VI l I i I 1 1_11-1i Vl 1:51:1 c9 158 .EYdvoe l :w omt. "08o.„_E2:=u0503C e.: OE ' aYoo0ms.y v p y a' t• o,o oO ..G c ¢0%. CaLaN^vdV NCLE r -w Y N a b'v ficyw aosa- o o 1 o E.,o -E oE ... a o I n3a N .`H rnioF.Ey o o 2 11 Ic EL 2 v oo =cE F. , : o f =H hv 2 E N u 'yz ycE ...va PC a3n,vouC o vw w o.E ,E= a, o 28 .c L L - n s c2'c d S o H € E c-StmLo9vm-P la xornv r..,6_ 7:5 bBcF =` - c v S $ •i v a oo o c C a a H `Co Vo- m uTv a, > o ' o 'eEyv=a Ta Ewav o v ) a3 ao vycao r a >. t 0 E =' `.. s L. c a d..oeo `aoo o 0 _ v7,-ooo oa � Eo = a .e 320 30od- pia .oE"°' a • a sE'�NE , 0 v .o w0o 0 o t r. E o vS E .2 c 2Ts c. oN V h 2 K m 4 m :C 2 ti, A Z 3 d G 3 i .'s p ( m N tEl QN 2 L Hid? U.2 2 0 2 1- N 0) C 0 Z Q J Z 0 Z 0 0 0 0 'O g cc o y m0. ; u. LL � Z CO O`0) • NO C > LL > > C. > m.0 .0 .0 .0 ac O 2.E EC E a«Os •0'.:9'„9 L00 4,S Z? E. 0 N 00 0 C O `y 9 0C 9 3 Y 079 0iE _ 0 N C 0 0 E 0 0 0 E C 0 0 en 0 C 0 2i 0 0 0 0 Q: O 4 C CO C CO 'C 0 0 Edward Boldt, Petitioner 00 ' 0) O' --.. w rnO w to -4o v. rt 0 ID 00 n 01 4- to 0 0 n N• w U! (D 0 m 0 H .rt 'c79 0 rt 0 p co 00 0 0 0 (0 0 S 0 O ID CD v NOTES CI> 0 0 0 NOIldiH S30 0 C 1 AD 00 am z0 00 0� C 7 z 0 0 x z r zm D1 0 0§ 0£ O ET, O W O 0 ti ae -�7 O 0 T 0 0 7 n w rn m a n 0 0 R m OP0- a OP ro Pc H.0 DD 0 0 fr J ▪ D 0 •0 O z 0 D (INV 0 c 0 37 0 G) A .Jpp Z a r 00p0 rn zc 1 0 0oz x z0 OOmU_ oc0r W tOwcc m W Z cc} Qo m 0 r z r"- co O 0 0 Security Features Inoluded. IJ+ Details on back. 0 0 O ACCOUNT HOW PAID_". AMT.OF . ACCOUNT. H . AML 1r x Kir. BALANCE MONEY ' ORDER BY ©2001 REdFORM® 8L806 GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 / www.oarfield-countv.com Special Use Permit STAFF USE ONLY > Doc. No.: Date Submitted: TC Date: > Planner: Hearing Date: GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) / General Location of Property: 0275 222 (Dry Fork) Road > Street Address CO 81630 DeBeque, Legal Description: See attached A Use & Size of Property in acres: Approximately 13,000 A Existing Special Use Requested: Hunting/Fishing Lodge (Resort) Description of ➢ Zone District: R/L > Name of Propertv Owner (Applicant): #10 Enterprises, LLC (dba High Lonesomedge) '222: Telephone: 970 -:98i -942o > Address: PO Rox 88 (0275 Road) A City: DeBeque State: co Zip Code: 8.1630 FAX: 283-5227 A. Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc): Richard H. Krohn, Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, L.L.P. Suite. 300 Telephone: 970-241-5500 D Address: 744 Horizon Court, > City: Junction State: co Zip Code: 81506 FAX: 243-7738 Grand STAFF USE ONLY > Doc. No.: Date Submitted: TC Date: > Planner: Hearing Date: SURFACE PROPERTY OWNERS: John Lamicq, Jr. 635 19-1/2 Road Grand Junction, CO 81503-9501 The Dougherty Ranch Trust J.V. Dougherty, Jr. 2250 J Road Grand Junction, CO 81505-9328 John V. and Carol F. Cassidy 57100 M.E. Road Collbran, CO 81624 SEVERED MINERAL INTEREST OWNERS: Occidental Oil Shale Attn: Property Tax Dept. P.O. Box 27570 Houston, TX 77227-7570 Karen J. Bosch 3151 F Road Grand Junction, CO 81504-5948 Tilton Trustee Attn: Arch Tilton 1441 Patterson Road, Unit 103 Grand Junction, CO 81506-1906 Thomas W. Woodward HC 30 Box 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-9800 Mitchell Lekas 1015 Bermuda Drive Concord, CA 94518-3916 Marjorie A. and Ernest J. Gerbaz 904 Palmer Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Robert Patricia Siegfried 5350 War Paint Place Colorado Springs, CO 80922 Albertson Ranches Co. Attn: Dale Albertson P.O. Box 420 De Beque, CO 81630 John Richard and Margaret K. Latham Julia Anne & Thomas A. Cox P.O. Box 441 Collbran, CO 81624-0441 David L. Furr P.O. Box 186 De Beque, CO 81630 Harry Turner, et al. 102 Main Avenue, South Office 1 Twin Falls, ID 83301-6266 Jean Hart P.O. Box 1946 Rolla, MO 65402 Marie Young Irrevocable Trust c/o ICG P.O. Box 659 Wichita Falls, TX 76307 William and Archie R. Urquhart 619 Shadow Brook Drive Grand Junction, CO 81504 Paul Etcheveny P.O. Box 371 De Beque, CO 81630-0371 Joe Bob Neal 5716 Irving Blvd. NW Albuquerque, NM 87114-4724 L.W. & C.M. Tilton 828 S. Marvin Avenue Tucson, AZ 85710-4948 r 0) 0) R a GARFIELD Name Query Report 07/06/2005 02:02PM N 3 16 R v, aaaaaaaaaalc( aaaaaaaaaaaaaa U<1'043: MNNo0o V of JNN0000CD W Zd0,rrr ter! N oddGamzNNZaY070caNa0• ZUro..iof-Y1 rZrODU UrmVrmm Uo— NMNWrmmmrnF-owWo U6Nw NNavDNw N o o O a o U U o 0. 5,' ZzN Z rQZN Oto 0, cn ..mmm ww w0)rn cc wrOIt-Met Vr NNr. Orrrcr zwr `� "tv0NN W NNa NNaNSU rorty VI'N. jj F W W N N r NhJiYr W.�*Z W 0 0 0 M O Z N Z a ~NNvNNON �aaai I aLL 00WrW"r Naa uz ONWQ06at�ZN VerIa a rN0NNm'S N.61..• ��'NWW a CO W w N N Z o 0 o r o N S N Z QQ I- U U rNU Z V U LLI N U 7, a Y Y Y Y Y O) Z Z Z ✓ x<WW00WwWW>LUzmmmmmzdm 1-F-x00W WNNNNZNNNMNOOr W W Nf-F- wwwww/1 .woomwwwUUF-F1-hh •...UUU W W N w W N N w W W W w W N N U U�(( Q UQ a U UQ o o W WW O o W o o W W o 0 0 0 0 o W w Q a' K R' K W W 0 0 0 o r o r r o o o o 000 CD.-- orFcFFFF-ooOoo o00000m00000000 r r O r r O C) r r r r r r 0 0 0) 0) 0) O O CO 00 0) 0) 0) 44rfr• 9401- t`tr“ I; oo000oo0 TIMCVCV 0(0 r V•'orNOC`10)rNCooo00 MMM r N Cl N r r Cl N M M 11) 0) N M C' CO 0D CO 0) r r r ZZzzzz ZZZZZZzzzzzz ZZ ZZZZZ ZZZ Z ZZZZZgZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ fiEF R - 1 r 1 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1-- ODUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 0 w w w w W w w w w w w W W W W W W W w w W w W w W JWCOMONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN a C 0 0 v E R z 00 N N M N M l0 N eF r 000) 0 r N r N M et N r r 0)00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 r 0000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000 M r e t M r N r e t r e t r V N r et N r r N N r r r* 4 et 0(00) ret 0r N00N O r N N 0)N Mer W W(00)000 0)0)0 r NN Nr r*1040)0)000000000 �}r er}} r 7.-- errD oOrrOvvvvvvavvv'cl' V 4 V'd'44444 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (0ef Nr00 (00 r N O r NMO00'0 O M r rNr M 0004(00000l000N V NNNNet d' NNNONONNNN 0 0 0 0 0 r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r r O r r r er V et 0000000000000000000000000 00000) W 00000000000 030000 0 000 U U U U U U U UO U U U U U U U U U U U U UUUU J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J w W w W w W w W w W w W w w w W w W W W W W w W W NNNNNNwwmco NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN d'KK(Xd'ddCCW W W W WWW W W W17 KKd'CCII aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa L'wW WwW W WWWWWWWW WWWWWUJWW W W W W UJW W W W W W W W w W w W w W W W w W w W w W ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZrrrzrrr WWWWwWWWWWW"ZZWWWWWWWWWWW wwwwwwwwwww^wwwwwwwwwwwww 000000clot, cc crxt r r r Ooooor 0 0r 0 0 0 0 0 r0 `4;.4;xr 4;4; rrirar rr1r4trar4t 0 0 0 0 O N O a 0 r 42 EAGLE CO. c , a Ns t in ur !`; F U z w Vic; h I Cq CD cif Q 0 F U Q cnN U Oce W L.L. Z Era cs 'al (1) a, a. Q3 z La X� Wo 0 z RIO BLANCO O 0 LK COLO. v UTAH to N tm ~ LO 0 JUL 07 '00 00:11RM DUFFL, & WRLDECK EXHIHrT "A" PARCEL A TOWNSHIP 8 Section 4: Section 5: section 9e section 10: sOOTN, RANGE 100 W., 6TM P.H. SW1/4NW1/4, NW1/45W1/4 s1/2N21/4, N1/28E1/4, sE1/4NW1/4, N81/4SW1/4 81/2N1/2, N1/261/2 s1/2Nw1/4, N1/2sW1/4 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 100 W., 6TH SW1/45E1/4, sl/2SW1/4 Lot 4 31/21£1/4, Ni41/4SE1/4, sW1/4NW1/4, N1/2Nw1/4 Seotion 26: section 33: Section 34: Section 35: P.H. N1/2SW1/4, Lots 1 and 2 1 Tract No. 38 according to Independent Ree -survey 04 nt as yl 023£928,owhich icht tractnl of Land was originally described by pa and N1/25W1/4 of Section 22. Tract No. 41 according to Independent Re-SurVey of 28, which tract of land was orginally described by patent of 11 /28E whi SEi/4SE1/4 of Section 22 and NW1/4SW1/4 of section 23. • 1 Tract No. 46 acoording to Independent Re-Survey 1028, which whi/h of tract of land was originally described by patent ea NSection 30- Tract No. 47 according to Independent Re -survey of 1928, which tract of land wan originally described by patent as $1/25E1/4 of section 20, W1/2NW1/4 of.eactian 28, N1/2N1/2 and sw1/4NW1/4 of Section 29, 81/21£1/4, NW1/48E1/4 and £1/20W1/4 of section 30 and 11E1/4NW1/4 of Section 31. T a S ENTRY NO. 01019 in section 31, according to independent Re -Survey of 1928, which tract of land vas sometimes re£erred to as N141/4231/4 of Section 31 And originally denerLbed6by pat nt aan the NF.1/4SE1/4 of Section 36, Tp. EXCEPTING FROH the above all that portion of Tract No. 41 according Tto the racts 42d andn 49,=tTownship e1 Seethe Range y of 1925 g100tW. ofhin htheo 6th P.M. ofries P.U. ALSO EXCEPTING A parcel of land situated in the SE1/4NWZJ4 and the NE1/48W1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 100 west of the 6th P.H., said parcel being more particularly described ae follows: Commencing at the Center of. said Section place, the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence s. 00 degrees 01'37" E. along the North-South said Section 10 1322.43 feet to the Southeast corner a s.L.H. Braun Cap in place; thence.N. 89 degkeeu 59.39" W. along the of said Section 10, 1859.87 feet; thence North 278.84 feetoBatpetentint en n thence continuing along 1) N. 26 degrees 56'41" E. 85.19 feet; 2) N. 17 degrees 36'11" E. 353.33 teet; 3) N. 14 degrees; 36'13" E. 377.75 feet; 4) N. 12 degrees 38'01" E. 218.47 feet; 5) N. 05 degrees 49'59" E. 581.13 feet; 6) N. 07 degreen 05'47' E. 54.48 feet; 7) N. 06 degrease 14'32" E. 264.89 feet; 8) N. 14 degrees 00'31" E. 57.19 feat; thence leaving said fenceline North 422.05 feet to a point on the northerly line of the 31/2NW1/4 of said Section 10; thence N. 89 degrees 54'14" E. along said northerly line 1461.57 feet to the Northeast Corner of said sE/14NW1/4, a S.L.H. Braes cap in place; thence S. 00 degrees 01'57" E. 1323.55 feet to the True Point o Beginning. 10, a 8.L.H. southerly erase cap in centerline of of said NE1/4301/4, line of the N1/23W1/4 an existing fenoalino; the following 8 courses.. PARCEL 8 TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST OP THE 6TH P.H. SECTION 6: Tract No. 40 EXHHIBIT "A" The following real .property Garfield, State of Colorado: Tax Schedule Numbers: 2+N13 -Obi -00-007 211113-091-00- 001 2415-211-00-006$ 21115-202-00-003v 21117-1511-00-005' 2)011-022-00-001 ' TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, BOOK 2125 PAGE 670 situated in the County 2)1113-114-00-003# 2)1)11-062-00-005 2441.-0111-00-003. 211111-031-00-002 21117-15h-00-005 6T11 P.i.. section Section section section section Section section Section Section Section Section 16: 17: 18: 19: 20: 28: 29: 30: 32: 35: 36: Tract 50: Tract 51: Tract 52: Tract 54: Tract 55: Tract 56: ract 59: ract 60: ract 61: of sW1/4S141/4 8E1/48E1/4 swl/48E1/4, NE1/48E1/4 Lot 9, N1/2NE1/4 111/2141/2 Lots 1, 2, 3 and 7 Lot 2, 8E1/4NW1/4, 81/2NE1/4, N1/2SE1/4, SW1/4SW1/4, E1/28W1/ 4 Lots 10, 11 and 13; 8E1[48E1/4 N£1/4N41/4 NE1/48E1/4 and Lots 2 and 5 Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1128W1/4 of Section 26, the NE1/4SE1/4 and SE1/4NE1/4 of Section 27 Being the same land described under the original survey as the S1/2SW1/4 of Section 26, 8E1/48E1/4 of section 27 and the NE1/4NW1/4 of Section 35 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4, E1/2NW1/4, and the NW1/4NW1/4 of Section 27 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/48E1/4 of Section 27, the E1/2 of Section 34, and the NW1/4NW1/4, 81/2NW1/4, and the SW1/4 of Section 35 .(less three (3) acres in Section 35) Being the same land described under the original survey as the 111/281/2 of Section 28 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4, 8E1/4NW1/4 and the N1/28W1/4 of Section 28 Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1/2NE1/4 and the SE1/4NE1/4 of Section 35, and the Sfi1/4NW1/4 of Section 36 Being the same land described under the original survey as the W1/28E1/4 and the N1/28W1/4 of Section 36 Being the same land described under the original survey as the hot 4 in Section 31, Township 7 South, Range 98 West; and the SE1/48E1/4 of Section 36, Township 7 South, Range 99 West TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 100 WEST, 6TH P.M. Section 15: Section 16: N1/28E1/4, NE1/48W1/4, and Lots 1, 2 and 4 Lot 2 Tracts 48G and 48H continued on page 2 PAGE 2 Tract 39: Tract 40: Tract 42: Tract 43: Tract 44: Tract 45: Tract 57: Tract 58: TOWNSHIP 8 Section 6: Section 7: section Section Section Section a: 9: 10: 11: BOOK 2125 PAGE 671 EXHIBIT "A" - Continued Basing the same land described under the original survey as the 81/2NE1/4, SE1/4NW1/4 of Section 25 Bering the same land described under the original survey as the E1/2SW1/4, and W1/28E1/4 of Section 25 Bering the same land described under the original survey as the 81/28W1/4 and SW1/48E1/4 of Section 23, and NW1/4NE1/4 of Section 26 Bering the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NW1/4 and NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 25, and SE1/4NE1/4 and NE1/48E1/4 of Section 26 Bering the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4NE1/4 of Section 26 Bering the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4, NW1/4SE1/4 AND NE1/4SW1/4 of Section 26 Bering the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/413E1/4 of Section 25, Township 7 South, Range 100 West; and Lot 3, the, NE1/4SW1/4 and the NW1/4SE1/4 of Section 30, Township 7 South, Range 99 West Being the same land described under the original survey as the SE1/4SE1/4 of Section 25, Township 7 South, Range 100 West; Lot 4 of Section 30 and Lot 1 of Section 31 in Township 7 South, Range 99 West, and NE1/4NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 7 South, Range 100 West SOUTH RANGE 98 WEST, 6TH. P.H. NW1/48E1/4, NE1/48W1/4, SE1/4NW1/4, SW1/4NE1/4, 81/2:3E1/4, and Lot 4, being the same land described under the original survey as the NW1/4NW1/4 of said Section 6 +~ N1/2NE1/4, EXCEPT a one acre tract as described in deed recorded in Book 181 at Page 317, records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder NW1/4NE1/4, N1/2NW1/4, SW1/4NWI/4 W1/2NE1/4, SE1/4NE1/4 SW:L/4NW1/4, NE1/48W1/4 N1/281/2 TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTHL RANGE 99 WEST, 6TH P.H. Section 1: Section 2: Section 3: Tract 39: Section 6: Ttact 37 being the same land described in survey as the NE1/4NE1/4 of said Section 1 Tract 43, being the same land described in survey as the SW1/4NE1/4 of Section 2 Tract 42, being the same land described in survey as the SE1/4NE1/4 of said Section 3 In Sections 3 and 4, being the same land the original survey as Lot 4 of Section 3 Tract 41, being the same land described original survey as Lot 4 of said Section 6. the continued on page 3 original the original the original described in under the PAGE 3 BOOK 2125 PAGE 67.. EXBIBIT "Am - Continued Together with all water and water rights, ditches and ditch rights appurtenant or belonging to or used in connection with the Property conveyed hereunder and as may be included under the following rights, subject to the limitations hereinafter following: 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Anderson and Hayes Ditch under priority No. 61; 1.5 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Hayes Ditch under priority No. 85; 3.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the DeLaMatyr and Anderson Ditch under priority No. 86; 0.7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Dry Pork Ditch under priority No. 64; 0.5 second -feet: of water allowed to flow in the Dry Fork Ditch 1st Enlargement under priority No. 135; 1.0 second -feet: of water allowed to flow in the Omundsou & Frost Ditch under priority No. 88; • 0.5 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Griswold Enlargement under priority No. 154A; 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Cottonwood Ditch No. 29 under priority No. 36; 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Cottonwood Ditch 1st Enlargement under priority No. 112; 0.8 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Loveless Ditch #73 under priority No. 113; 2.3 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Armstrong Ditch #81 under priority No. 134; 1.7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Boldt Ditch (springs) #73PP under priority No. 114B; and and together with 2.7 acre feet in the Boldt Reservoir No. lA under priority No. 1A. Grantor sells and quitclaims to Grantee any other water, water rights, ditches, or ditch rights owned or controlled by Grantor in Garfield or Mesa Counties, Colorado, including, without limitation, any water or water rights historically used in connection with the Property not specifically. listed above, which may include the following water rights: 1.7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in Boldt Gulch Ditch under Priority No. 114B; 1.0 eft; of water allowed to flow in the Omundson & Frost Ditch under Priority No. 88; 2.3 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Armstrong Ditch #81 under Priority No. 134; .7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Dry Fork Ditch under Priority No. 64; and .5 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Dry Fork Ditch 1st Enlargement under Priority No. 135. continued on page 4 gook 2125 PAGE 679 The following real property situated in the County of Mesa, State of Colorado: Resurvey Tract 49, formerly EM SWM, NW1,( SEM of Section 14, Township 8 South, Range 99 West Resurvey Tract 57, in Sections 26, 27 and 28, Township 8 South, Range 99 West, 6th P.M. Together with all permits and grazing authorities and leases, whether federal or state or both, as related to the lands above described and issued to Grantor with reference to said lands. Grantor does not and will not warrant title or any continuing rights with respect to such permits, leases or grazing authorities and transfer or assignment will be solely in accordance with the conditions and limitations which appear on the face of such authorities and as further limited by applicable rules and regulations of the issuing authorities, and federal and state statutes. Grantee will maintain such permits, leases and authorities in full force and effect so long as Grantor retaina any security interest in the lands to be conveyed as above. Together with all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to oil, gas and other minerals in, on or under the lands conveyed hereunder, to the extent, and only the extent, such interests may be owned by Grantor on the date of execution of this Deed, excepting all oil, gas and other minerals as have been previously excepted, reserved or conveyed by conveyance, patent, or otherwise; and subject to all existing and recorded leases, permits and authorities to enter, explore for and remove such oil, gas and other minerals. i.,; i E: POOR QUALITY DOCUMENT PROVIDED FOR REPRODUCTION BOOK 2125 PAGE 674 EXHIBIT "B" The following exceptions apply to property located in Garfield County, Colorado. 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public records of which Grantee has actual knowledge. 2. Intentionally omitted. 3. Intentionally omitted. 4. Intentionally omitted. 5. Intentionally omitted. 6. Intentionally omitted. 7. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments for tax year 1994 and subsequent years. 8 Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, and a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in the United States Patents. 9. Map and Statement of the Gaff Ditch, filed April 25, 1885 as Reception No. 1507. 10. Map and Statement of the Armstrong Ditch filing June 15, 1888 as Reception No. 7715. 11. All coal, the right to mine and remove the same by Act of June 22, 1910 as reserved in United States Patent recorded February 18, 1892 in Book 112 at Page 370. continued on page 2 PAGE 2 BOOK 2125 PAGE 675 12. Right of way for Anderson and Dela Matyr ditch as contained in statement recorded June 11, 1896 in Book 28 at Page 373. 13. Map and Statement of the L. T. Stewart Reservoir filed July 11, 1902 as Reception No. 26830. 14. Map and Statement of The Boldt Ditch, filed August 16, 1905 as Reception No. 30980. 15. Map and Statement of The Third Enlargement of The Cottonwood Ditch filed June 6, 1910 as Reception No. 39632. 16. All coal and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 19, 1937 in Book 172 at Page 598. 17. All coal and other minerals, the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 9, 1937 in Book 191 at Page 172. 18. A perpetual easement and right of way for an irrigation ditch 7 feet in width across the S1/28E1/4 of Section 6, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. as granted in instrument recorded June 26, 1939 in Book 181.at Pages 318 and 319. and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, remove the same, as reserved in United States Patent November 18, 1939 in Book 194 at Page 596. and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, remove the same as reserved in United States Patent recorded 9, 1943 in Book 201 at Page 519. 19. All coal mine and recorded 20. All coal mine and February 21. Reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to any and all oil and gas lying under and upon said lands with the right of ingress and egress from said lands for the purpose of exploring, mining, drilling, extracting and removing such oil and gas, and in that connection with the right to erect improvements and lay pipelines and do such other necessary and expedient improvements as might be required for the operation of oil and gas production but without interference to the improvements on such lands as reserved by Phillip A. Moore in deed recorded February 17, 1947 in Book 226 at Page 154 and any interests therein or assignments thereof. 22. Undivided 5/10 of 1 percent of the minerals as conveyed to Wayne N. Aspinall by mineral deed recorded Hay 27, 1947 in Book 227 at Page 165. 23. An undivided 1/10 interest of the minerals as conveyed to N. E. Pyeatt by mineral deed recorded December 15, 1948 in Book 239 at Page 630. continued on page 3 BOOK 2125 PAGE 676 PAGE 3 24. An undivided 1/10 interest of the minerals as conveyed to N. E. Pyeatt by mineral deed recorded December 15, 1948 in Book 239 at Page 632. 25. Undivided one-half interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by L. W. Tilton in the deed to A. G. Tilton, recorded March 23, 1950 in Book 249 at Page 197, and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 26. Reservation of all oil, gas and other minerals on, in, or under all of said lands, together with the right of ingress and egress in, on and over said lands for the purpose of mining, drilling, extracting or exploring said land for oil, gas and other minerals and removing the same therefrom; together with the use of the surface of said lands as is necessary or essential to produce, save, transport or remove therefrom such oil, gas and other minerals as reserved by A. G. Tilton in deed recorded October 4, 1950 in Book 254 at Page 278, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof. 27. One-half interest in all remaining oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by A. G. Tilton in the deed to Harry H. Satterfield recorded April 3, 1951 in Book 257 at Page 476, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 28. All oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by O. C. Tidwell in the deed to Charles E. and Dorothy E. Burg, recorded November 26, 1952 in Book 266 at Page 573, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 29. Undivided one -hail interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, which have not been previously reserved by Harry H. Satterfield in the deed to Joseph E. Clarkson and Norma S. Clarkson, recorded July 1, 1960 in Book 328 at Page 82, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 30. Undivided one-half interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by Charles E. Burg aka Chas E. Burg in the deed to W. M. Metzler and Winifred A. Metzler, recorded January 24, 1963 in Book 346 at Page 539, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 31. Undivided one-eighth interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by Norma S. Clarkson in the deed to Richard D. barley, recorded December 7, 1964, in Book 362 at Page 336, and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 32. Terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, and M. Peyton Bucy, as Lessee, recorded :March 13, 1972 in Book 428 at Page 202 and in Book 428 at Pages 180, 200 and 202. 33. Terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, and Koch Industries, Inc., as Lessee, recorded September 4, 1981 in Book 580 at Page 791. continued on page 4 BOOK 2125 PAGE 677 PAGE 4 4. Terms and conditions of Hancock Gulch Unitization Agreement as referred to in Certificate of Unitization recorded February 16, 1979 in Book 522 at Page 959. 5. Right of way agreement between William T. Spear and Clara spear to Dyco Petroleum Corporation recorded August 21, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 671, and as modified by instruments recorded May 31, 1983 in Book 628 at Page 119, and February 22, 1984 in Book 644 at Page 702 and March 21, 1986 in Book 685 at Page 450. 6. Reservations as contained in deed from William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears to Enerwest, Inc. recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 869, and Page 884. .7. A sixty foot easement and right of way for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress on, over and across and through a 60 foot strip of land lying thirty feet on either side of the centerline of County Road No. 200 as conveyed to Enerwest, Inc. in deed recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 891. '8. Terms and conditions of Agreement for the Boldt Springs Pipeline described in instrument recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 918. 9. Right of way easement granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas in instrument recorded January 25, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 449 (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) ;o. Pipeline Easements as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company by Enerwest; Inc., by documents recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 541, and recorded June 25, 1982 in Book 602 at Page 84. ;i. Easement and right of way 50 feet in width for the operation, construction and maintenance to operate a pipeline, or pipelines, and appurtenances thereto as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 553 and as contained in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 344. t2. Easement and right of way for the construction, operation and maintenance of a pipeline or pipelines being 50 feet in width as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 560, and as contained in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 351. i3. Pipeline easement granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 560 and in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 351. (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) L4. Pipeline right of way granted to Getty Trading and Transportation Company in instrument recorded July 5, 1983 in Book 630 at Page 14. (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) continued on page 5 PAGE 5 BOOK 2125 PAGE 67' 5. Terms and conditions of oil and gas lease from William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, to Celsius Energy Company recorded June 2, 1989 in Book 755 at Page 296, and any interests therein or assignments thereof. 6. Terms and conditions of oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee recorded February 7, 1990 in Book 772 at Page 406. 7. Right of way easement granted to Celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded December 31, 1990 in Book 796 at Page 175. (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) 3. Easement granted to Conquest Oil Company in instrument recorded March 1, 1991 in Book 799 rtt Page 726. 7. Right of way and easement granted to LFC GC #1 Cory., A Delaware Corporation in instrument recorded April 29, 1991 in Book 803 at Page 82. 3. Road and wellsite right of way granted to Celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded January 27, 1992 in Book 822 at Page 400. Any interest of Otis C. Coles, Jr. and Susan K. Coles in and to the boundary conflict between Tracts 41 and 42 in Township 7 South, Range 100 West as shown on the independent resurvey accepted by the Department of the Interior General Land Office on January 23, 1928. 2. Lack of a right'cf access from the land to any open public road, street or highway. NOTE: Pertains only to the following lands: • N1/28E1/4, NE1/4SW1/4, and Lots 1, 2, and 4, Section 15, Lot 2, Section 16 and Tracts 48G and 48H all in Township 7 South, Range 100 West. SW1/48W1/4 Section 16, 8E1/48E1/4 Section 17, SW1/48E1/4, NE1/48E1/4 Section 18, Lot 9 and N1/2NE1/4 Section 19, N1/2N1/2 Section 20 all ih Township 7 South, Range 99 West. Tracts 39, 41, 42 and 43, in Township 7 South, Range 99 West. Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West. 3. Easement and right of way for the Dry Fork Ditch No. 44, Omundson Ditch and Frost Ditch No. 62. insofar as they may affect subject property. 4. Rights of way for any County Roads. 5. Any and all mining claims, arising from or on account of recorded Location Certificate, Affidavits of Labor, Assignments and Conveyances of such claims or interests therein. continued on page 6 PAGE 6 3OOK 2125 PAGE 67? :he following exceptions apply to property located in Mesa County, '_oluredo. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public records of which Grantee has actual know.ledae.. Intentionally oinitted. Intentionally omitted. Intentionally omitted. Intentionally omitted. Reservation of right of way for any ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States in U. S. Patent recorded March 31, 1925 in Book 285 at page 63 and in Patent recorded May 4, 1957 in Book 362 at page 199. Excepting and reserving however to the United States, all the coal and other minerals in the lands so entered and patented, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same pursuant to the provisions and limitations of the Act of Dec. 29, 1916 (39 STat 862) as reserved in U. S. Patent recorded May 4, 1937 in Book 362 at page 199, affecting Tract 57. Reserving unto Grantors an undivided 1/2 interest in and to all minerals now owned by grantors lying in and under the lands herein conveyed together with right of ingress and egress for purpose of prospecting for, mining and removing the same subject however to payment to the surface owners of full compensation from Licencess or Lessees of Grantors for any damages occasioned thereby , as reserved by Charles E. Burg aka Chas. E. Burg and Dorothy E. Burd in Deed to W. M. Metews and Winifred A. Metews recorded February 8, 1963 in Book 839 at page 366 and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. l hts med or 3 asserted underts of fany mirece rraland reservration, leaseaorrconveyancedidentiified in items 7 and 8 hereof. o. Right of way between Winifred A. Metzler and W. W. Metzler and State of Colorado recorded August 31, 1966 in Book 900 at page 109 for a roadway as set forth on the sheets attached hereto. continued on page 7 PAGE 7 11. BOOK G 125 PAGE 4480 Grantors reserve a non-exclusive right of way for ditches and canals as constructed and existing from the points of diversion which exist to and for the benefit of the lands described on Exhibit B hereto and all running of the reserved water rights therein and together with a non-exclusive right of way along said ditches and canals for the sole purpose of repairing and maintaining the same, as reserved by William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears in Deed recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 1330 at page 5, as set forth on the sheet attached hereto. 12. Right of way and easement grant recorded June 22, 1992 in Book 1907 at page 171 as set forth on the sheet attached hereto. 13. Lack of a right of access from the land to any open public road, street or highway. NOTE:This exception is necessary because it does not appear from the instruments in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County in which subject property is situate that any right of access exists to an open public roadway. 4 PAGE DOCUMENT Alta. gP 0 (u (F .) 1 11111 3111111111111111 111 IIIIL .1U1111 1111 1111 513195 09/04/1997 01;35P B1032 P532 388 1 of 4 R 21.00 D 13.00 N 0.00 GARFIELD CLERK WARRANTY DEED DAVID L. FURR ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10), sells and conveys to #10 ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. ("Grantee"), a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, Texas 77042, the real property (the "Property") in Garfield County, Colorado described as follows: Parcel A tract of land in the SE'IANW'/s of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said SE'%NW'/a, thence S. 00°05'05" W. rJ 729.80 feet along the East line of said � 9'�$ W peat, ttot theeNorth 150'50"ne ofsaid W. 0 298.34 feet; thence N. 00°04'09" E. r r 5E1/aNW'/; thence N. 89°50'50" E. 298.54 feet along said North line to the point of beginning, and containing 5.00 acres, more or less. (All bearings in O 0 this description are relative to the North line of said Section 10 being called N. 89°58'W., a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner of said Section 10, and a post in a mound of rocks for the Northeast corner of said Section 10.) TOGETHER WITH a 50 foot wide easement for the right of ingress and egress over that certain road from the foregoing described real property to X-5 Road g""s (a/k/a the Dry Fork Road), as said road is in place and being used, said easement being situate in SE'/aNW IA of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. TOGETHER WITH a proportionate interest in and to any and all water and water rights, ditches and ditch rights thereto appertaining, including, but not exclusively limited to, 0.42 c.f.s. from The Bowen Well No. 1, which was an absolute water right for 1.32 cubic feet of water per second of time with an appropriation date of .Tilly 12, 1965, as awarded in Case No. W-1231, November 30, 1972, in Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado. Said Well is located in the SE1/4NW'4 , Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M., at a point 1,840 feet East of the West line and 2,060 feet South of the North line of said Section 10, Garfield County, Colorado. * TOGETHER WITH an easement for maintenance of an existing pipeline from the above described real property to the above-described Well, said easement being situate in the SE'/aNW'/a of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. 11»III HI11/1 li l 513195 09/04/1997 01135P 81032 P533 388 2 of 4 R 21.00 0 13.00 N 0.00 GARFIELD CLERK a cel 2 The SW'/4NE;, SE1/4NW1/4 and N1/2SE1/4, all in Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.; EXCEPTING, HOWEVER, a tract of land in the NE'/4SE'/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said NE' /4SE'/4; thence S. 00°12' 13" W. 1,305.31 feet along the East line of said NE'/4SE'/4 to the Southeast corner of said NE,ASE'/a.; thence S. 89°28'55" W. 1,016.34 feet along the South line of said NE'/4SE'4; thence N. 00°12'08 E. 1,308.49 feet to the North line of said NE'/4SE'/4; thence N. 89°39'40" E. 1,016.34 feet along said North line to the point of beginning, and containing 30.49 acres more or less. (Alt bearings in this description are relative to the North line of said Section 10 being called N. 89°58' W., a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner of said Section 10 and a post in a mound of rocks for the Northeast corner of said Section 10); AND EXCEPTING; that portion of the N1/2SE'/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. not otherwise excepted from this conveyance and lying south and west of X-5 Road (a/k/a the Dry Fork Road), as said road is in place and being used; TOGETHER WITH a proportionate interest in and to any in and nlwater nod { water rights, ditches and ditch rights thereto appertaining, exclusively limited to, 1.022 c.f.s. from The Bowen Well No. 1, which has an (yam absolute water right for 1.32 cubic feet of water per second of time with an appropriation date of July 12, 1965, as awarded in Case No. W-1231, ''0S'/J/ November 30, 1972, in Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado. Said Well is located in the SE'/4NW'/4, Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M., at a point 1,840 feet East of the West line and 2,060 feet South of the North line of said Section 10, Garfield County, Colorado; * t.r- AND TOGETHER WITH a proportionate interest in and to any and all water I rights, ditches and ditch rights thereto appertaining or used in connection therewith, including, but not exclusively limited to, .256 c.f.s. from The Bowen Well No.1, which has an absolute water right for 1.32 cubic feet of water per second of time with an appropriation date of July 12, 1965, as awarded in Case No. W-1231, November 30, 1972, in Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado. Said Well is located in the SEI/<NW 1/4, Section 10, Township 8 South, Range -2- 11II111IIIII 31111iiIi ill Illlil Ilk 111Iiiii 1111 IN 513195 09/04/1997 01:35P B1032 P534 388 3 of 4 R 21.00 D 13.00 N 0.00 GPRFIELD CLERK 98 West of the 6th P.M., at a point 1,840 feet East of the West line and 2,060 feet South of the North line of said Section 10, Garfield County, Colorado.* /- together with all its appurtenances. Grantor warrants tide to the above Property against any person or entity claiming under Grantor, subject to: general property taxes and assessments for 1996 and all subsequent years; and the foowing: *AL1 water, water rights, ditches and ditch rights transferred hereby are quitclaimed, and no warranties are made. 1. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove granted, ane re therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the authority premises othe United nted, as a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by reserved in the United States Patent recorded January 18, 1990 in Book 28 at page 527; 2. A strip of land 60 feet in width for a County Road as deeded to the Board of County Commissioners in Deed recorded October 18, 1918 in Book 110 at page 294; 3. Reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, hydrocarbons by Paul y and all minerals together with the right to enter upon and use so much of the surfaceace as as may development ibe necessary in the exploration and n deed re orded April 12, 1960, iin Bok 325 at Page 207 and any ane all interests therein or assignments thereof; 4. Reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, hydrocarbons surface as may and allc say in ttogether rationwith the right to cnter upon and use and development of the same as somuch by the Vaughan and necessary Davie C. Vaughan in deed recorded October 27, 1976 in Book 489 at page 686; 5. All oil, gas and hydrocarbons as reserved by James R. Brown, Charles R. a Brown, Virginia W. Brown and Shirley A. Brown as described in deed recorded October 27, ate 574 and page 575 and any and all interests therein or assignments 1980 in Book 558page thereof; 6. Pipeline easement granted to Norer Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982, in Book 601 at page 7, Terms and conditions onOias and Gas recordedand between Oc ober 23, 1991, in Book 861 as Lessor, and Celsius Energy Company, at page 103 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; -3- 'raid '3A 11 1211'71" , �� R, a.,a• �lil �� ilii�Ilil it 513195 09/04/1997 01:G5P 81032 P53 388 4 of 4 R 21.00 D 13.00 N 0.00 GARFIELD CLERK 8. Right of way easement granted to Celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded September 4, 1992, in Book 840 at page 9. Easement and right of way for a pipeline as granted to Getty Trading and Transportation Company in instrument recorded August 22, 1984, in Book 655 at page 6; and 10. Deed of Trust recorded May 11, 1995, in Book 940 at page 471, for the benefit of Charles R. Brown securing a PromissoryNote ote in the originto altprincipal amount of $80,000, which Grantee assumes and agrees�reto pay f' a75 dayof "'- 1996. EXECUTED the i./• DAVID L. EURR STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) 1 p Th foregoing; instrument was acknowledged before me this 02O day of 1996, by David L. Furr. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: F:\WKS66TDOCZWARRANTY. WO O Notary Public -4- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED DAVID L. FURR ("Grantor"), whose address is P. O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630 in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042, the real property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Parcel 1 A tract of land in the NE'/4SE'/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6"' P.M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at Northeast corner of said NE%4SE'/4; thence South 00°12'13" West 1305.31 feet along the East line of said NE1/4SE1/4 to the Southeast corner of said NE'/4SE'/4; thence South 89°28'55" West 1016.34 feet along the South line of said NE1/4SE'/4; thence North 00°12'08" East 1308.49 feet to the North line of said NE1/4SE1/4; thence North 89°39'40" East 1016.34 feet along said North line to the POINT OF BEGINNING, (All bearings in this description are relative to the North line of Section 10 being called North 89°58' West, a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner, of said Section 10, and a post in mound of rocks, for the Northeast corner of said Section 10.) Parcel 2 All that part of the N1/4SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 611' P.M. lying southerly and westerly of County Road No. 200 also known as Dry Fork Road also known as X-5 Road and not included in Parcel 1 described above. TOGETHER WITH all its appurtenances, including, without limitation, all rights to any unexpired oil, gas and other mineral leases describing the Property. Grantor warrants title to the Property against any person or entity claiming under Grantor, subject to: general property taxes and assessments for 2002; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an improvement district; right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded January 18, 1900 in Book 28 at Page 527; a strip of land 60 feet in width for a County Road as deeded to the Board of County Commissioners in deed recorded October 18, 1918 in Book 110 at Page 294; reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, hydrocarbons and all minerals together with the right to enter upon and use so much of the surface as may be necessary in the exploration and development of the same as reserved by Paul Etcheverry in deed recorded April 12, 1960 in Book 325 at Page 207 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, hydrocarbons and all minerals together with the right to enter upon and use so much of the surface as may be necessary in the exploration and development of the same as reserved by T. J. Vaughan and Davie C. Vaughan in deed recorded October 27, 1976 in Book 489 at Page 686; all oil, gas and hydrocarbons as reserved by James R. Brown, Charles R. Brown, Virginia W. Brown and Shirley A. Brown as described in deed recorded October 27, 1980 in Book 558 at Page 574 and Page 575 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; pipeline easement granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 530 and as corrected in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 355; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between Charles R. Brown, as Lessor and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee, recorded October 23, 1991 in Book 816 at Page 103 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; easement and right of way for a pipeline as granted to Getty Trading and Transportation Company in instrument recorded August 22, 1984 in Book 655 at Page 6; terms and conditions of Garfield County Resolution No. 82-310 providing for an exemption from Garfield County Subdivision regulations recorded December 13, 1982 in Book 614 at Page 623; right of way for a pipeline as granted to Getty Trading and Transportation in instrument recorded July 9, 1984 in Book 652 at Page 654; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between David L. Furr, as Lessor and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee, recorded February 20, 1992 in Book 823 at Page 990 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof. Signed this day of , 2003. STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. David L. Furr The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2003, by David L. Furr. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: M\Wp\866]\012 David Fwr\Settlement Documents -2\Deeds \WartDecd-Fart to NIO.wpd 2 Notary Public SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED KID CURRY, INC. ("Grantor"), a dissolved Colorado corporation, whose address is P.O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042, the property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Township 7 South, Range 100 West of the 6th P.M. Section 18: SE'/4NE'/4 together with all its appurtenances, including without limitation, all rights to any unexpired oil, gas and other mineral leases describing the Property. Grantor warrants title to the Property against any person or entity claiming under Grantor, subject to: general property taxes and assessments for 2003; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an improvement district; right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 12, 1920 in Book 73 at Page 119; any and all mining or placer claims; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between Leonis P. Chuc and Neva M. Chuc, as Lessor and Chevron Oil Company, as Lessee, recorded July 26, 1972 in Book 433 at Page 391 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; lack of a right of ingress and egress to and from the land. Signed this day of (SEAL) , 2003. KID CURRY, INC, By: David L. Furr, President STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2003, by David L. Furr as President of Kid Curry, Inc. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public M:\Wp\8667\012 David Fun \Settlement Documents- 2\Deeds \WarrDeed-Kid Curry to /DO - 002.wpd 2 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED DAVID L. FURR ("Grantor"), whose address is P. O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630 in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042, the real property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Parcel 1 A tract of land in the NE`LASE'/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6t11 P.M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at Northeast comer of said NE'/SE'/; thence South 00°12'13" West 1305.31 feet along the East line of said NESE%4 to the Southeast comer of said NE''ASE'/; thence South 89°28'55" West 1016.34 feet along the South line of said NE'ASEY; thence North 00°12'08" East 1308.49 feet to the North line of said NE'/QSE`/; thence North 89°39'40" East 1016.34 feet along said North line to the POINT OF BEGINNING, (All bearings in this description are relative to the North line of Section 10 being called North 89°58' West, a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner, of said Section 10, and a post in mound of rocks, for the Northeast corner of said Section 10.) Parcel 2 All that part of the N%2SE'/ of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6`h P.M. lying southerly and westerly of County Road No. 200 also known as Dry Fork Road also known as X-5 Road and not included in Parcel 1 described above. TOGETHER WITH all its appurtenances, including, without limitation, all rights to any unexpired oil, gas and other mineral leases describing the Property. Grantor warrants title to the Property against any person or entity claiming under Grantor, subject to: general property taxes and assessments for 2002; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an improvement district; right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded January 18, 1900 in Book 28 at Page 527; a strip of land 60 feet in width for a County Road as deeded to the Board of County Commissioners in deed recorded October 18, 1918 in Book 110 at Page 294; reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, hydrocarbons and all minerals together with the right to enter upon and use so much of the surface as may be necessary in the exploration and development of the same as reserved by Paul Etcheverry in deed recorded April 12, 1960 in Book 325 at Page 207 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, hydrocarbons and all minerals together with the right to enter upon and use so much of the surface as may be necessary in the exploration and development of the same as reserved by T. J. Vaughan and Davie C. Vaughan in deed recorded October 27, 1976 in Book 489 at Page 686; all oil, gas and hydrocarbons as reserved by James R. Brown, Charles R. Brown, 'Virginia W. Brown and Shirley A. Brown as described in deed recorded October 27, 1980 in Book 558 at Page 574 and Page 575 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; pipeline easement granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 530 and as corrected in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 355, terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between Charles R. Brown, as Lessor and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee, recorded October 23, 1991 in Book 816 at Page 103 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; easement and right of way for a pipeline as granted to Getty Trading and Transportation Company in instrument recorded August 22, 1984 in Book 655 at Page 6; terms and conditions of Garfield County Resolution No. 82-310 providing for an exemption from Garfield County Subdivision regulations recorded December 13, 1982 in Book 614 at Page 623; right of way for a pipeline as granted to Getty Trading and Transportation in instrument recorded July 9, 1984 in Book 652 at Page 654; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between David L. Furr, as Lessor and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee, recorded February 20, 1992 in Book 823 at Page 990 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof. Signed this day of , 2003. STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. David L. Furr The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2003, by David L. Furr. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: M,\Wp\8661\012 David Fun \Settlement Documents - 2\Deeds \WairDeed-Furt to #10.wpd 2 Notary Public EXHIBIT A PROPERTY TRANSFERRED TO #10 ENTERPRISES BY FURR 1. Property commonly referred to as "Kimball Creek": Township 7 South, Range 100 West of the 6th P.M. Section 18: SE1/4NE1/4 County of Garfield State ofColora.do 2. Property commonly referred to as the "Home Site": All that portion of the N1/2SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. lying south and west of X-5 Road (a/k/a the Dry Fork Road), as said road is :in place and being used. County of Garfield State of Colorado 3. Property commonly referred to as the "30 Acres" or the "30 Acre Exception": A Tract of land in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West: of the 6`h P.M. more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast comer of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence S. 00°12'13" W. 1305.31 feet along the East line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4 to the Southeast corner of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence S. 89°28'55" W. 1016.34 feet along the South line of said NE 1/4 Sl: 1/4; thence N.00°12'08" E. 1308.49 feet to the North line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence N. 89°39'40" E.1016.34 feet along said North line to the point of beginning, (all bearings in this description are relative to the North line of Section 10 being called N.89°58'W. a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner, of said Section 10, and a post in mound of rocks, for the Northeast corner of said Section 10.) County of Garfield State of Colorado 30437801 230437201.1 - 20 - Cu J / (Y= ' )t ,411 ,2:,:..1,. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042 ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to DAVID L. FURR, whose address is P.O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630 the property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6'h P.M. Section 12: NE`/4SW'IA AND RESERVING AND RETAINING TO GRANTOR all water rights, decreed or undecreed, if any, be they direct flow, underground, well, storage and certificated and uncertificated water shares, ditches, ditch rights and other easements appurtenant to, belonging to, or currently or historically used in connection with or adjudicated for use on all or any part of the above Property, Grantor warrants title to the Property, subject to: General property taxes and assessments for 2002; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an irnprovement district; reservations and exceptions contained in the United States Patent affecting subject property, a strip of land 60 feet in width granted to the Board of County Commissioners in deed recorded January 19, 1919 in Book 110 at Page 342; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between Z.B. Scott and Celia M. Scott, as Lessor and William C. Garett, as Lessee, recorded January 26, 1972 in Book 426 at Page 528 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; terms and conditions of decree setting forth the ownership of the mineral estate recorded January 13, 1988 in Book 727 at Page 735 and recorded January 12, 1988 in Book 727 at Page 659, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; lack of a right of access to and from the land. Signed this day of , 2002. #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company By: Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr. Its: Authorized Agent STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2002, by Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr., as authorized agent of #10 Enterprises, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 2 EXHIBIT D PROPERTY TRANSFERRED TO FURR BY #10 ENTERPRISES 1. Property commonly referred to as the "40 Acres": Real property conveyed to #10 in connection with Subscription Agreement dated Feb. 1, 1996 between David Furr and #10 Enterprises, LLC: Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. Section 12: NE1/4SW1/4 County of Garfield State of Colorado 2. A certain 120 acre portion of the property referred to as the "Frost Place" Section 11: N'/2S1/2 EXCEPT: Beginning at the south sixteenth corner of said Section 11 and Section 10, a pipe and 3 1/4" aluminum cap marked "HCE INC LS 19598"; thence North 00°36'06" East, a distance of 1304.89 feet to the quarter comer common to said Section 11 and Section 10, a sandstone marked "1/4"; thence along the north line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11 North 88°58'30" East, a distance of 383.98 feet; thence South 01°54'05" East, a distance of 1048.49 feet; thence South 00°36'06" West, a distance of 250.00 feet to the south line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11; thence along said line South 88°09'44" West, a distance of 430.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. County of Garfield State of Colorado 30437801.23.04-3-7,SO4-.4- - 29 - 23..414°,0' 4 -29- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042 ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to DAVID L. FURR, whose address is P.O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630 the real property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. Section 11: N%2S1/2 EXCEPT: Beginning at the south sixteenth comer of said Section 11 and Section 10, a pipe and 3 1/4" aluminum cap marked "HCE INC LS19598"; thence North 00°36'06" East, a distance of 1304.89 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 11 and Section 10, a sandstone marked "1/4"; thence along the north line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11 North 88°58'30" East, a distance of 383.98 feet; thence South O1°54'05" East, a distance of 1048.49 feet; thence South 00°36'06" West, a distance of 250.00 feet to the south line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11; thence along said line South 88°09'44" West, a distance of 430.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; TOGETHER WITH all its appurtenances (except those reserved in this deed), including without limitation, all rights to any unexpired oil, gas and other mineral leases describing the Property. AND RESERVING AND RETAINING TO GRANTOR all water rights, decreed or undecreed, if any, be they direct flow, underground, well, storage and certificated and uncertificated water shares, ditches, ditch rights and other easements appurtenant to, belonging to, or currently or historically used in connection with or adjudicated for use on all or any part of the above Property, Grantor warrants title to the Property, subject to: General property taxes and assessments for 2002; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an improvement district; reservations and exceptions contained in the United States Patent affecting subject property; reservation of one-half of all minerals as reserved in deed recorded January 24, 1963 in Book 346 at Page 539 and any interests therein or assignments thereof; right of way easement granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 25, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 449; easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of a pipeline as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 351; pipeline right of way grant conveyed to Getty Trading and Transportation in instrument recorded July 5, 1983 in Book 630 at Page 14; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessor and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee, recorded February 7, 1990 in Book 772 at Page 406 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; right of way easement conveyed to Celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded December 31, 1990 in Book 796 at Page 175; lack of a right of access to and from the land. Signed this day of , 2002. #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. By: Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr. Its: Authorized Agent The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of by Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr., as authorized agent of #10 Enterprises, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ,2002, Notary Public M \Wp\8667\012 David FurzlSettlement Documents 2\Deeds\WarrDeed1XlO to Furr-Frost Place-04.wpd 2 F ':1/06/04 SAT 10:40 FAX 970 62, 305 COJIMONWEATH TITLE CO'ictChh CYji) 2001 Smommillit Ocm» nI 0 zx LL 7 0 0 a 0 U 0 0. 0. LL RETURN TO: t• rULTED INTERNATIONAL. INC. 2210 HIGHWAY 6 6 50, SUITE 20) GRAND JUNCTION, CO 61508 WARRANTY DEED O0C FEE: 59. 'I) 1 i 155: Gi,RFiEtD St W,0 Ce:. Pee S K. DON HITCHBORN. whose address is P.O. Box 277, Fn,ita, CO 81521. in consideration of the payment of $894,315.03, sells and conveys to I/10 ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.. a Texas limited liability company. whose address is cm Paul R. Vabidiek, Jr., Two Houston Center. 909 Fannin. Houston, TX 77010. the following described real property in Garfield County, Colorado: See attached Schedule A. consisting of one page. initialed by Grantor. which is incorporated by this reference TOGETHER WITH any and all water. water rights, and well rights appurtenant to the property described above. Grantor warrants title to the property described above, subject to: general property taxes and assessments for 1994 and all subsequent years; easements, restrictions, reservations. rights-of-way. and all other documents of record: easements and rights-of- way visible upon inspection of the Property: any rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; building, zoning, and land use rules, regulations. resolutions, restriction, codes, and decisions: and any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies. conflicts. shortages in area, or encroachments); and exclusion of all warranties and representations of every nature relative to the water, water rights and well rights described above as though this were a quitclaim deed. SIGNED the L7 day of July. 1994. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF MESA ) ss. r r. K. DON HITCHBORN Subscribed and sworn to before me this St day of July, 1994. by K. Don Hitchborn. WITNESS my hand and official scat, My commission expires: 0lx1ffiNBOUCOCC\01.0).4N[ Notary Public GARFIELD COUNTY TAX SCHEDULE NOS- 290085.290086.290097,290088,280024 11/06/04 SAT 10:40 FAX 970 6; 005 COMMONMEATH TITLE CO' @Joo2 SCNEOULE A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BC040911 1i:: 279 PARCEL I Tract 40 in Sections 30 and 31. Township 5 south, ftange 100 West, 6th P.M., and in Sections 25 and 36. Township 5 South, Range 101 West, 6th P.M.. according to the resurvey thereof, (The foregoing property formerly has been described aw follows: SE1/4NW1/4; E1/2 SW1/4 and Lot 4 in Section 30; E1/20W1/4. 141/2NE1/4, NE1/4NE1/4. tW1/4SE1/4, El/25111/4, and Lots 3 and 4. Section 31, Township $ South, Range 100 West. Gth P.M,: and Lot 2 in Section 4 and Lot 1 in section 5. Township 6 south, Range 101 Neat. 6th P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OP COLORADO PARCEL It SE1/4, 5E3/4NW1/4 AND E1/25W1/4 oio Section . Township 53ccc1 on south. Range 300 Nest, 6th P.M., N1Town/hp4481/4 Aof D Sect4 2, and Lots 1, ). 3 and 5. and N1/25W1/4, SE// oC.Section 3. Township 6 South, Range 101 Nest. 6th P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL I11 0E1/4, NE1/4N1a1/4, 1(1/2NN1/4 and Wi/2SN1/4 of Section 24; SE1/4NE1/4 and ti/2$E1/4 of Section 21; E1/2NE1/4 of Section 26; and W1/2NW1/4 of. Section 25; Township 6 South, Range 101 West. 6th P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELO STATS OF COL0PSA0 PARCEL IV N1/2 of Section 14: E1/)11Z1/4 of Seecion 1S: SW1/4sE1/4 ?NO $N1/4 O{ Section 3:: TOwnni hP 6 South., Range 101 West. 0th P.N. COUnTY OF GARRIELO STATE OF COLORADO TOGETHER WITH any end all water, Pater rights, and well rights appurtenant to the property described above; d nt of AND rreau of (nodiTH 'analementitates CorralDCanyonrMountain` Allotment game (Grazing Permit No. 00061 i.or 20S AVM Recorded at o'clock Reception No Rec... aer. WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 31st day of January t9 95, between Western Properties, L.P., a Mississippi Limited Partnersh::p of the "County of Lauderdale issb a51DDl of e�r7C rSS'DR and X110 Enterprises, L.L.C. whose legal address is 1050 Wilerest, Houston, Texas of the and State 3OOK 2125 PAG 668 1708032 02;50 P 02/02/9 MONIKA TODD CLK&REC MESH COUNTY C 15.8 15.83 CO Texas #717.042...a- 95 County of and State of CfcH r$8o, grantee(s): WITNESSETH, That the grantork), for and in consideration of the sum of other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has do grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the grantee(x), together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the and State of Colorado, described as follows: See attached Exhibit "A" Ten Dollars ($10.00) and granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents its heirs and assigns forever, all the real property, County of Mesa also known by street and number as: N/A assessor's schedule or parcel number: TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents. issues, and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor(s), either in law or equity. of in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances unto the grantee(. its _ heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor(*), for iLze! f , its heirs, and personal representatives, do covenant.grant, bargain and agree to and with the grantee(s), it s heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents is well seized of the premises above conveyed, ha good. sure. perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and ha good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the sante in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except such exceptions• set forth on Exhibits A and B hereto. tTh Thegrantor(s)shal! and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable EXHIBIT "A" The followings real .property Garfield, State of Colorado: Tax Schedule Numbers: 21113 -Obi -00-007° 211h3-091-00-001° 21115-271-00-0069 21115-202-00-0030 21117-1511-00-0051 2401-022-00-001.` 7 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, 6T11 P.rs. TOWNSHIP OK 2 1 situated in the 2)103-1111-00-003° 2)1)1.1-062-00-005 20)11-0)11-00-003> 24)11-031-00-002• 2111.7-15)1-00-005 m Section section Section Section Section Section Section Section section Section Section 16: 17: 18: 19: 20: 28: 29: 30: 32: 35: 36: Tract 50: Tract 51: Tract 52: Tract 54: Tract 55: Tract 56: Tract 59: Tract 60: Tract 61: TOWNSHIP 7 5 PAGE 670 County of Sw1/48Wi/4 0E1/48E1/4 8wi/4dE1/4, NE1/48E1/4 Lot 9, N1/2NE1/4 111/2)11/2 Lots 1, 2, 3 and 7 Lot 2, 8E1/4NW1/4, 81/2NE1/4, N1/28E1/4, SW1/48W1/4, E1/28W1/4 Lots 10, 11 and 13; SE1/.48E1/4 NE1/4NW1/4 NE1/48E1/4 and Lots 2 and 5 Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1/28W1/4 of Section 26, the NE1/4SE1/4 and SE1/4NE1/4 of Section 27 Being the same land described under the original survey as the 51/28141/4 of Section 26, SE1/4SE1/4 of Section 27 and the NE1/4NW1/4 of Section 35 Being the same land described under the original survey as the 8W1/4NE1/4, E1/2NW1/4, and the NW1/4NW1/4 of Section 27 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/48E1/4 of Section 27, the E1/2 of Section 34, and the NW1/4NW1/4, 81/2NW1/4, and the SW1/4 of Section 35 (less three (3) acres in Section 35) Being the same land described under the original survey as the 111/2111/2 of Section 28 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4, St1/4NW1/4 and the N1/28W1/4 of Section 28 Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1/2NE1/4 and the SE1/4NE1/4 of Section 35, and the S01/4NW1/4 of Section 36 Being the same land described under the original survey as the W1/28t1/4 and the N1/28W1/4 of Section 36 Being the same land described under the original survey as the Lot 4 in Section 31, Township 7 South, Range 98 West; and the 5E1/48E1/4 of Section 36, Township 7 South, Range 99 West SOUTH, RANGE 100 WEST, 6T}} P.M. Section 15: N1/25E1/4, NE1/4SW1/4, and Lots 1, 2 and 4 Section 16: Lot 2 Tracts 48G and 4811 continued on page 2 PAGE 2 Tract 39: Tract 40: Tract 42: Tract 43: Tract 44: Tract 45: Tract 57: Tract 58: TOWNSHIP BOOK 21:25 PAGE 671 EXHIBIT "A" - Continued Being the same land described under the original survey as the 81/2NE1/4, SE1/4NW1/4 of Section 25 Being the same land described under the original survey as the E1/28W1/4, and W1/28E1/4 of Section 25 Being the same land described under the original survey as the 81/25W1/4 and 8W1/48E1/4 of Section 23, and NW1/4NE1/4 of Section 26 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NW1/4 and NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 25, and SES/4NE1/4 and NE1/45E1/4 of Section 26 Being the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4NE1/4 of Section 26 Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4, NW1/4SE1/4 AND NE1/4SW1/4 of Section 26 Being the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 25, Township 7 South, Range 100 West; and Lot 3, the NE1/48W1/4 and the NW1/4SE1/4 of Section 30, Township 7 South, Range 99 West Being the same land described under the original survey as the SE1/4SE1/4 of Section 25, Township 7 South, Range 100 West; Lot 4 of Section 30 and Lot 1 of Section 31 in Township 7 South, Range 99 West, and NE1/4NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 7 South, Range 100 West 8 SOUTH, RANGE 98 WEST, 6TH P.M. NW1/4SE1/4, NE1/48W1/4, SE1/4NW1/4, SW1/4NE1/4, 51/28E1/4, and Lot 4, being the same land described under the original survey as the NW1/4NW1/4 of said section 6 N1/2NE1/4, EXCEPT a one acre tract as described in deed recorded in Book 181 at Page 317, records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder NW1/4NE1/4, N1/2NW1/4, SW1/4NW1/4 w1/2NE1/4, SE1/4NE1/4 SW1/4NW1/4, NE1/48W1/4 N1/281/2 Section 6: Section 7: Section Section Section Section 8: 9: 10: 11: TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, 6TH P.M. Section 1: Section 2: Section 3: Tract 39: Section 6: Ttact 37 being the same land described in the original survey as the NE1/4NE1/4 of said Section 1 Tract 43, being the same land described in the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4 of Section 2 Tract 42, being the same land described in the original survey as the SE1/4NE1/4 of said Section 3 In Sections 3 and 4, being the same land described in the original survey as Lot 4 of Section 3 Tract 41, being the same land described under the original survey as Lot 4 of said Section 6. continued on page 3 PAGE 3 ,V,,.Jv� BOOK 2125 PAGE 671. EXHIBIT "A• - Continued Together with all water and water rights, ditches and ditch rights appurtenant or belonging to or used in connection with the Property conveyed hereunder and as may be included under the following rights, subject to the limitations hereinafter following; 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow Ditch under priority No. 61; 1.5 second -feet of water allowed to priority No. 85; 3.0 second -feet of water allowed to Anderson Ditch under priority No. 86; in the Anderson and Hayes flow in the Hayes Ditch under 0.7 second -feet of water under priority No. 64; 0.5 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Enlargement under priority No. 135; 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to Ditch under priority No. 88; 0.5 second -feet of water allowed Enlargement under priority No. 154A; 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow No. 29 under priority No. 36; 1.0 second -feet of water allowed to flow lst Enlargement under priority No. 112; 0.8 second -feet of water allowed to flow under priority No. 113; 2.3 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Armstrong Ditch under priority No. 134; 1.7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Boldt Ditch (Springs) #73PP under priority No. 1148; and and together with 2.7 acre feet in the Boldt Reservoir No. lA under priority No. 1A. Grantor sells and quitclaims to Grantee any other water, water rights, ditches, or ditch rights owned or controlled by Grantor in Garfield or Mesa Counties, Colorado, including, without limitation, any water or water rights historically used in connection with the Property not specifically listed above, which may include the following water rights: 1.7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in Boldt Gulch Ditch under Priority No. 114B; 1.0 efs of water allowed to flow in the Omundson & Frost Ditch under Priority No. 88; 2.3 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Armstrong Ditch #81 under Priority No. 134; .7 second -feet of water allowed to flow in the Dry Fork Ditch under Priority No. 64; and .5 necoad-feet of water allowed to flow in the Dry Fork Ditch 1st Enlargement under Priority No. 135. flow in the DeLabfatyr and allowed to flow in the Dry Pork Ditch Dry Fork Ditch lst flow in the Omundson & Frost to flow in the Griswold in the Cottonwood Ditch in the Cottonwood Ditch in the Loveless Ditch #73 #81 continued on page 4 3OOK 2125 PAGE 673 The following real property situated in the County of Mesa, State of Colorado: Resurvey Tract 49, formerly E% SW%, NW1,% SE% of Section 14, Township 8 South, Range 99 West Resurvey Tract 57, in Sections 26, 27 and 28, Township 8 South, Range 99 West, 6th P.M. Together with all permits and crazing authorities and leases, whether federal or state or both, as related to the lands above described and issued to Grantor with reference to said lands. Grantor does not and will not warrant title or any continuing rights with respect to such permits, leases or grazing authorities and transfer or assignment will be solely in accordance with the conditions and limitations which appear on the face of such authorities and as further limited by applicable rules and regulations of the issuing authorities, and federal and state statutes. Grantee will maintain such permits, leases and authorities in full force and effect so long as Grantor retains any security interest in the lands to be conveyed as above. Together with all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to oil, gas and other minerals in, on or under the lands conveyed hereunder, to the extent, and only the extent, such interests may be owned by Grantor on the date of execution of this Deed, excepting all oil, gas and other minerals as have been previously excepted, reserved or conveyed by conveyance, patent, or otherwise; and subject to all existing and recorded leases, permits and authorities to enter, explore for and remove such oil, gas and other minerals. riEUC;F 1 E: FOOR QUALITY DOCUMENT PROMDED FOR REPRODUCTION BOOK 2 125 PAGE 674 EXHIBIT "B" The following exceptions apply to property located in Garfield County, Colorado. 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public records of which Grantee has actual knowledge. 2. Intentionally omitted. 3. Intentionally omitted. 4. Intentionally omitted. 5. Intentionally omitted. 6. Intentionally omitted. 7. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments for tax year 1994 and subsequent years. 8. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, and a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in the United States Patents. 9. Map and Statement of the Gaff Ditch, filed April 25, 1885 as Reception No. 1507. 10. Map and Statement of the Armstrong Ditch filing June 15, 1888 as Reception No. 7715. 11. All coal, the right to mine and remove the same by Act of June 22, 1910 as reserved in United States Patent recorded February 18, 1892 in Book 112 at Page 370. continued on page 2 BOOK 2125 PAGE PAGE 2 ch as 12. Right of statementway for recordednJuneon and 11, 18961a inMatyr Book 28tat Page 373. in 13. Map and Statement of the L. T. Stewart Reservoir filed July 11, 1902 as Reception No. 26830. 14. Map and Statement of The Boldt Ditch, filed August 16, 1905 as Reception No. 30980. 15. Map and Statement of The Third Enlargement of The Cottonwood Ditch filed June 6, 1910 as Reception No. 39632. 16. All coal and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 19, 1937 in Book 172 at Page 598. 17. All coal and other minerals, the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 9, 1937 in Book 191 at Page 172. 18. A perpetual easement and right of way for an irrigation ditch 7 feet in width across the S1/28E1/4 of Section 6, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. as granted in instrument recorded June 26, 1939 in Book 181 at Pages 316 and 319. 19. All coal and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same, as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 18, 1939 in Book 194 at Page 596. 20. All coal and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same as reserved in United States Patent recorded February 9, 1943 in Book 201 at Page 519. 21. Reservation of an undivided one-half interest in and to any and all oil and gas lying under and upon said lands with the right of ingress and egress from said lands for the purpose of exploring, mining, drilling, extracting and removing such oil and gas, and in that connection with the right to erect improvements and lay pipelines and do such other necessary and expedient improvements as might be required for the operation of oil and gas production but without interference to the improvements on such lands as reserved by Phillip A. Moore in deed recorded February 17, 1947 in Book 226 at Page 154 and any interests therein or assignments thereof. 22. Undivided 5/10 of 1 percent of the minerals as conveyed to Wayne N. Aspinall by mineral deed recorded May 27, 1947 in Book 227 at Page 165. 23. An undivided 1/10 interest of the minerals as conveyed to N. E. Pyeatt by mineral deed recorded December 15, 1948 in Book 239 at Page 630. continued on page 3 BOOK 2125 PAGE 676 PAGE 3 24. An undivided 1/10 interest of the minerals as conveyed to N. E. Pyeatt by mineral deed recorded December 15, 1948 in Book 239 at Page 632. 25. Undivided one-half interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by L. W. Tilton in the deed to A. G. Tilton, recorded March 23, 1950 in Book 249 at Page 197, and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 26. Reservation of all oil, gas and other minerals on, in, or under all of said lands, together with the right of ingress and egress in, on and over said lands for the purpose of mining, drilling, extracting or exploring said land for oil, gas and other minerals and removing the same therefrom; together with the use of the surface of said lands as is necessary or essential to produce, save, transport or remove therefrom such oil, gas and other minerals as reserved by A. G. Tilton in deed recorded October 4, 1950 in Book 254 at Page 278, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof. 27. one-half interest in all remaining oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by A. G. Tilton in the deed to Harry H. Satterfield recorded April 3, 1951 in Book 257 at Page 476, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 28. All oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by 0. C. Tidwell in the deed to Charles E. and Dorothy E. Burg, recorded November 26, 1952 in Book 266 at Page 573, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 29. Undivided one-half interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, which have not been previously reserved by Harry H. Satterfield in the deed to Joseph E. Clarkson and Norma S. Clarkson, recorded July 1, 1960 in Book 328 at Page 82, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 30. Undivided one-half interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by Charles E. Burg aka Chas E. Burg in the deed to W. M. Metzler and Winifred A. Metzler, recorded January 24, 1963 in Book 346 at Page 539, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests therein. 31. Undivided one-eighth interest in all oil, gas and other mineral rights, as reserved by Norma S. Clarkson in the deed to Richard D. Darley, recorded December 7, 1964, in Book 362 at Page 336, and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 32. Terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, and M. Peyton Bucy, as Lessee, recorded March 13, 1972 in Book 428 at Page 202 and in Book 428 at Pages 180, 200 and 202. 33. Terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, and Koch Industries, Inc., as Lessee, recorded September 4, 1981 in Book 580 at Page 791. continued on page 4 BOCK 2125 PAGE 677 PAGE 4 34. Terms and conditions of Hancock Gulch Unitization Agreement as referred to in Certificate of Unitization recorded February 16, 1979 in Book 522 at Page 959. 35. Right of way agreement between William T. Spear and Clara Spear to Dyco Petroleum Corporation recorded August 21, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 671, and as modified by instruments recorded May 31, 1983 in Book 628 at Page 119, and February 22, 1984 in Book 644 at Page 702 and March 21, 1986 in Book 685 at Page 450. 36. Reservations as contained in deed from William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears to Enerwest, Inc. recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 869, and Page 884. 37. A sixty foot easement and right of way for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress on, over and across and through a 60 foot strip of land lying thirty feet on either side of the centerline of County Road No. 200 as conveyed to Enerwest, Inc. in deed recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 579 at Page 891. 38. Terms and conditions of Agreement for the Boldt Springs Pipeline described in instrument recorded August 25, 1981 1n Book 579 at Page 918. 39. Right of way easement granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas in instrument recorded January 25, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 449 (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) 40. Pipeline Easements as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company by Enerwest, Inc., by documents recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 541, and recorded June 25, 1982 in Book 602 at Page 84. 41. Easement and right of way 50 feet in width for the operation, construction and maintenance to operate a pipeline, or pipelines, and appurtenances thereto as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 553 and as contained in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 344. 42. Easement and right of way for the construction, operation and maintenance of a pipeline or pipelines being 50 feet in width as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 560, and as contained in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 351. 43. Pipeline easement granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 26, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 560 and in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 351. (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) 44. Pipeline right of way granted to Getty Trading and Transportation Company in instrument recorded July 5, 1983 in Book 630 at Page 14. (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) continued on page 5 PAGE 5 BOOK. 2125 PAGE 67 45. Terms and conditions of oil and gas lease from William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, to Celsius Energy Company recorded June 2, 1989 in Book 755 at Page 296, and any interests therein or assignments thereof. 46. Terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessors, and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee recorded February 7, 1990 in Dook 772 at Page 406. 47. Right of way easement granted to Celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded December 31, 1990 in Book 796 at Page 175. (Affects Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M.) 48. Easement granted to Conquest Oil Company in instrument recorded March 1, 1991 in Book 799 at Page 726. 49. Right of way and easement granted to LFC GC #1 Cory., A Delaware Corporation in instrument recorded April 29, 1991 in Book 803 at Page 82 50. Road and wellsite right of way granted to celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded January 27, 1992 in Book 822 at Page 400. 51. Any interest of Otis C. Coles, Jr. and Susan K. Coles in and to the boundary conflict between Tracts 41 and 42 in Township 7 South, Range 100 West as shown on the independent resurvey accepted by the Department of the Interior General Land Office on January 23, 1928. 52. Lack of a right of access from the land to any open public road, street or highway. NOTE: Pertains only to the following lands: N1/26E1/4, NE1/48W1/4, and Lots 1, 2, and 4, Section 15, Lot 2, Section 16 and Tracts 48G and 40H all in Township 7 South, Range 100 West. SW1/48W1/4 Section 16, SEI/4SE1/4 Section 17, SW1/46E1/4, NE1/48E1/4 Section 18, Lot 9 and N1/2NE1/4 Section 19, N1/2N1/2 Section 20 all in Township 7 South, Range 99 West. Tracts 39, 41, 42 and 43, in Township 7 South, Range 99 West. Section 11, Township 8 South, Range 98 West. 53. Easement and right of way for the Dry Fork Ditch No. 44, Omundson Ditch and Frost Ditch No. 62 insofar as they may affect subject property. 54. Rights of way for any County Roads. 55. Any and all mining claims, arising from or on account of recorded Location Certificate, Affidavits of Labor, Assignments and Conveyances of such claims or interests therein. continued on page 6 PAGE 6 BOOK 2125 PAGE 67? The following exceptions apply to property located in Mesa County, Colorado. 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records of which Grantee has actual knowledae.. 2. Intentionally oiuitted. 3. Intentionally omitted. 4. Intentionally omitted. 5. Intentionally omitted. 6. Reservation of right of way for any ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States in U. S. Patent recorded March 31, 1925 in Book 285 at page 63 and in Patent recorded May 4, 1957. in Book 362 at page 199. 7. Excepting and reserving however to the United States, all the coal and other minerals in the lands so entered and patented, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same pursuant to the provisions and limitations of the Act of Dec. 29, 1916 (39 STat 862) as reserved in U. S. Patent recorded May 4, 1937 in Book 362 at page 199, affecting Tract 57. 8. Reserving unto Grantors an undivided 1/2 interest in and to all minerals now owned by grantors lying in and under the lands herein conveyed together with right of ingress and egress for purpose of prospecting for, mining and removing the same subject however to payment to the surface owners of full compensation from Licencess or Lessees of Grantors for any damages occasioned thereby , as reserved by Charles E. Burg aka Chas. E. Burg and Dorothy E. burg in Deed to W. M. Metews and Winifred A. Metews recorded February 8, 1963 in Book 839 at page 366 and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. l hts 9.Rights of asserted underf any minerace alarese nd o`vration. lease lor Iconveyancedidenticlaimed efied orn items 7 and 8 hereof. 10. Right of way between Winifred A. Metzler and W. W. Metzler and State of Colorado recorded August 31, 1966 in Book 900 at page 109 for a roadway, as set forth on the sheets attached hereto. continued on page '1 BOOK 2125 PAGE 680 PAGE 7 11. Grantors reserve a non-exclusive right of way for ditches and canals as constructed and existing from the points of diversion which exist to and for the benefit of the lands described on Exhibit B hereto and all running of the reserved water rights therein and together with a non-exclusive right of way along said ditches and canals for the sole purpose of repairing and maintaining the same, as reserved by William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears in Deed recorded August 25, 1981 in Book 1330 at page 5, as set forth on the sheet attached hereto. 12. Right of way and easement grant recorded June 22, 1992 in Book 1907 at page 177 as set forth on the sheet attached hereto. 13. Latk of a right of access from the land to any open public road, street or highway. NOTE:This exception is necessary because it does not appear from the instruments in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County in which subject property is situate that any right of access exists to an open public roadway. 11/06/04 SAT 10:40 FAX 970 625 05 C0MMONWEATH TITLE CO f]j002 SCHEDULE A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 8000911:,:12 79 PARCEL I Tract 40 in Sections 3o and 31. Township 5 south, Range 100 Hest, 6th P.M.. and in Sections 25 and 16. Toenship 5 South, Range 101 We -t. 6th P.M., according to the roOurecy thereof. (Mc foregoing property formerly has been desBribed as follows: SEL/4NW1/4; E1/2 5W1/4 and Lot 4 in Section 30; £1/2+n41/4. u1/214E1/4, NE1/4NE1/4. NH1/45E1/4, E1/25t41/4, and Lots 3 and 4. Section 31. Township 5 South, 04n9e 100 West, 6th P.M.; and Lot 2 in section 4 and Loc 1 in Section 5. Township 6 South, Range 101 Hent. 6th P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL I1 5E1/4. SE1/4NW1/4 AND E1/25W1/4 Of Section 31, Tounehip 5 South. Range 100 Wert, 6th P.M.; Lot 3 and NN1/45N1/4 of Section 2. and Lots 1, i. 3 and 4. and N1/25441/4, 51:1/4SW1/4 AND SE1/4 of.Scction 3. Tocnship 6 South. Range 101 Hcst. 6Ch P.M. COONTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLOP D0 PARCEL III NE1/4, NE1/40W1/4, W1/2NW1/4 and WS/25W1/4 of Section 24; SE1/4NE1/4 and Ei/2SE1/4 of Section 23; E1/2NEl/4 of Section 26; and N1/214W1/4 of Section 25; Township 6 South. Range L01 West. 6th P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL XV N1/2 of 5ectioa 14; el/1a1/4 of Seddon 15: SW1/15E1/4 AND Su1/4 0: Section 11: Township 6 Souch.. Range 101 Nest. Gth P.N. COUNTY 07 6ARPIELO STATE 07 COL0S.DO TOGETHER WITH Any and all water, Vater rights, and ee11 tights appurtenant to the property described shove; AND TOGETHER i4ITH United Staten Departlannt of the interior, eurcad of Land :lanagenent Corral Canyon Mountain Allotment (Grazing Permit No. 6606) for 708 AUN EXHIBIT A PROPERTY TRANSFERRED TO #I0 ENTERPRISES BY FURR Property commonly referred to as "Kimball Creek": Township 7 South, Range 100 West of the 6`h P.M. Section 18: SE1/4NE1/4 County of Garfield State of Colorado 2. Property commonly referred to as the "Home Site": All that portion of the N1/2SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. lying south and west of X-5 Road (a/k/a the Dry Fork Road), as said road is in place and being used. County of Garfield State of Colorado 3. Property commonly referred to as the "30 Acres" or the "30 Acre Exception": A Tract of land in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6`h P.M. more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence S. 00°12'13" W. 1305.31 feet along the East line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4 to the Southeast corner of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence S. 89°28'55" W. 1016.34 feet along the South line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence N.00°12'08" E. 1308.49 feet to the North line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4; thence N. 89°39'40" E.1016.34 feet along said North line to the point of beginning, (all bearings in this description are relative to the North line of Section 10 being called N.89°58'W. a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner, of said Section 10, and a post in mound of rocks, for the Northeast corner of said Section 10.) County of Garfield State of Colorado 30437801.230137801.1 - 20 - SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042 ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to DAVID L. PURR, whose address is P.O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630 the property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6`" P.M. Section 12: NE'/4SW'/4 AND RESERVING AND RETAINING TO GRANTOR all water rights, decreed or undecreed, if any, be they direct flow, underground, well, storage and certificated and uncertificated water shares, ditches, ditch rights and other easements appurtenant to, belonging to, or currently or historically used in connection with or adjudicated for use on all or any part of the above Property, Grantor warrants title to the Property, subject to: General property taxes and assessments for 2002; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an improvement district; reservations and exceptions contained in the United States Patent affecting subject property; a strip of land 60 feet in width granted to the Board of County Commissioners in deed recorded January 19, 1919 in Book 110 at Page 342; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between Z.B. Scott and Celia M. Scott, as Lessor and William C. Garett, as Lessee, recorded January 26, 1972 in Book 426 at Page 528 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; teems and conditions of decree setting forth the ownership of the mineral estate recorded January 13, 1988 in Book 727 at Page 735 and recorded January 12, 1988 in Book 727 at Page 659, and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; lack of a right of access to and from the land. Signed this day of , 2002. #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company By: Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr. Its: Authorized Agent j STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002, by Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr., as authorized agent of #10 Enterprises, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 2 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, whose address is 1050 Wilcrest, Houston, TX 77042 ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, sells and conveys to DAVID L. FURR, whose address is P.O. Box 88, DeBeque, CO 81630 the real property ("Property") in Garfield County, Colorado, described as follows: Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6"' P.M. Section 11: N1/2S1/2 EXCEPT: Beginning at the south sixteenth corner of said Section 11 and Section 10, a pipe and 3 1/4" aluminum cap marked "HCE INC LS19598"; thence North 00°36'06" East, a distance of 1304.89 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 11 and Section 10, a sandstone marked "1/4"; thence along the north line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11 North 88°58'30" East, a distance of 383.98 feet; thence South 01°54'05" East, a distance of 1048.49 feet; thence South 00°36'06" West, a distance of 250.00 feet to the south line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11; thence along said line South 88°09'44" West, a distance of 430.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; TOGETHER WITH all its appurtenances (except those reserved in this deed), including without limitation, all rights to any unexpired oil, gas and other mineral leases describing the Property. AND RESERVING AND RETAINING TO GRANTOR all water rights, decreed or undecreed, if any, be they direct flow, underground, well, storage and certificated and uncertificated water shares, ditches, ditch rights and other easements appurtenant to, belonging to, or currently or historically used in connection with or adjudicated for use on all or any part of the above Property, Grantor warrants title to the Property, subject to: General property taxes and assessments for 2002; easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records; rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records; any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Property would disclose (for example, discrepancies, conflicts, shortages in area, or encroachments), and which are not shown by the public records; any lien or charge on account of the inclusion of the subject property in an improvement district; reservations and exceptions contained in the United States Patent affecting subject property; reservation of one-half of all minerals as reserved in deed recorded January 24, 1963 in Book 346 at Page 539 and any interests therein or assignments thereof; right of way easement granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded January 25, 1982 in Book 591 at Page 449; easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of a pipeline as granted to Northern Natural Gas Company in instrument recorded June 18, 1982 in Book 601 at Page 351; pipeline right of way grant conveyed to Getty Trading and Transportation in instrument recorded July 5, 1983 in Book 630 at Page 14; terms and conditions of Oil and Gas Lease by and between William T. Spears and Clara A. Spears, as Lessor and Celsius Energy Company, as Lessee, recorded February 7, 1990 in Book 772 at Page 406 and any and all interests therein or assignments thereof; right of way easement conveyed to Celsius Energy Company in instrument recorded December 31, 1990 in Book 796 at Page 175; lack of a right of access to and from the land. Signed this day of , 2002. #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ss. By: Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr. Its: Authorized Agent The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2002, by Paul R. Vahldiek, Jr., as authorized agent of #10 Enterprises, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public M:\Wp\8667\012 David Fors \Settlement Documents - 2\Deeds\WalDeed-#10 to Purr -Frost Place-04.wpd 2 EXHIBIT D PROPERTY TRANSFERRED TO FURR BY WO ENTERPRISES 1. Property commonly referred to as the "40 Acres": Real property conveyed to #10 in connection with Subscription Agreement dated Feb. 1, 1996 between David Furr and #10 Enterprises, LLC: Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. Section 12: NE1/4SW1/4 County of Garfield State of Colorado 2. A certain 120 acre portion of the property referred to as the "Frost Place" Section 11: N1/2S1/2 EXCEPT: Beginning at the south sixteenth corner of said Section 11 and Section 10, a pipe and 3 1/4" aluminum cap marked "HCE INC LS 19598"; thence North 00°36'06" East, a distance of 1304.89 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 11 and Section 10, a sandstone marked "1/4"; thence along the north line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11 North 88058130" East, a distance of 383.98 feet; thence South 01°54'05" East, a distance of 1048.49 feet; thence South 00°36'06" West, a distance of 250.00 feet to the south line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11; thence along said line South 88°09'44" West, a distance of 430.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. County of Garfield State of Colorado 30437801230937801.1 - 29 - • DUFFORD WALDECK MILBURN & KROHN LLP REQ ht+ vE WLAA Attorneys at Law SEP 2 1 2005 Betty C. Bechtel William H.T. Frey Nathan A.Keever Richard H. Krohn Christopher G. McAnany` Laird T. Milburn Michael C. Santo Sam D. Starritt t Michael A. Kuzminski* Cindy C. Lay John R. Pierce+ • William G.Waldeck Retired • Flint B. Ogle Of Counsel D. J. Dufford (1919-1998) • +Also Admitted in Oregon °Also Admitted in Utah t Also Admitted in Wyoming GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 744 Horizon Court Suite 300 Grand Junction Colorado 81506 TEL 970.241.5500 FAX 970.243.7738 MONTROSE, COLORADO TEL 970.249.4500 MOAB, UTAH TEL 435.259,2225 www.dwmk.com dwmk@dwmk.com Gell ;E:t.' 'ry e BUILDING& P Ft NHN September 20, 2005 Fred Jarman Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 811 Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: High Lonesome Lodge Resort Special Use Permit Application Dear Mr. Jarman: Enclosed please find supplemental material for the above -referenced application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give us a call. /saj Enclosure (##10 Authorization) cc: Buzz Cox F:\SYS\ W p\866TOONamwn 3-LTR.wpd Sincerely, Sherri Jack Legal Assistant to Richard H. Krohn VICINITY MAP - BUILDINGS #10 Enterprises, LLC — High Lonesome Ranch LEGEND: 1. Cookhouse 2. Guest House 6 Bedrooms, 4 Bathrooms — 13 Guest Beds 3. Ranch Manager Residence Corral House - Wrangler Residence 5. Homestead House 2 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms — 4 Guest Beds 6. Guide's Cabin 7. Forshay House 2 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms — 4 Guest Beds 8. McKay Fork House 4 Guest Beds 9. McKay Fork Bunkhouse 6 Guest Beds 10. High Ranch Cabins 4 Guest Beds F:\SYS\ Wp\8669\00SVicinity Map Legend.wpd CaA' Lice() 1• O DODueH 1] 11' t 3 N 0 11 ttt REcErvIE JAN 2 4 2.006 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PENNI IIS G .619 Shadowbrook Drive Grand Junction, CO 81504 uary 11, 2006 The Office. of Garfield County Commissioners Garfield County Courthouse 108 gth Street Suite 100 Glenwood Springs,CO 816024069 To Whom It May Concern: I have sent the following letter to the Planning Commission m Garfield County Dufford Waldeck Milburn & Krohn LLP attys. in Grand Junction. To wit "We have received your communication regarding the Special Use Permit application for, a reso entered by #10 Enterprises, LLC. We own undivided one-half interest in oil, gas and other minerals rights to some of the affected property. Obviously we are not anxious to see a resort placed on top of land where some drilling could occur. As you are aware, this area near Rifle is rich with gas wells, and we would like to see the properties developed where we are in involved. I am referring specifically to Township 8 South, Range 99 West, 6 P.M. approximately 5 miles northwest of DeBeque off of County Road 200: We hope that you can see our point of view and deny resort develop income is important to us. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please consider this view on the above matte property. Sincerely yours, Archie R. Urquhart cc to: Dufford Waldeck Milburn & Krohn LLP Attys. at Law 744 HorizonCt. Grand Junction, CO 81506 William H.T. Frey Nathan A. Keever Richard H. Krohn Christopher G. McAnent Laird T. Milburn John R. Pierce+ Sam D.Starrittt William 5.DeFord Michael A. Kuzminski* Cindy C. Lay William G. Waldeck Retired Flint B. Ogle Of Counsel • D. J. Dufford (19194998) +Also Admitted in Oregon 'Also Admitted in Utah t AISo Admitted in Wyoming GRAND )UNCTION, COLORADO 744 Horizon Court Suite 300 Grand Junction Colorado 81506 TEL 970.241.5500 FAX 970.243.7738 MONTROSE, COLORADO TEL 970.249.4500 MOAB, UTAH TEL 435.259.2225 www.dwmk.com dwmk@dwmk.com DUFFORD WALDECK MILBURN & KROHN LLP Attorneys at Law December 12, 2005 Mark L. Bean Garfield County Building & Planing Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Special Use Permit for a Resort for High Lonesome Lodge Dear Mr. Bean: This letter is in response to your letter to me concerning the above matter dated November 29, 2005. Your letter requires that the applicant take four specified actions in anticipation of the public hearing scheduled for January 16, 2006 at 1:15 p.m. 1. I have caused to be published in the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel a copy of the enclosed Public Notice. That Public Notice is exactly as you provided to me with your November 29, 2005 letter, except that I have incorporated into it the legal description of the property in Garfield County, Colorado. The legal description as it was provided to your office as an attachment to my letter to Fred Jarman dated September 19, 2005, was somewhat disjointed. It included legal descriptions from a number of conveyancing documents, which together constitute the full legal description of the property. In preparation for publication, I have consolidated and reformatted that legal description into the form that appears in the Public Notice. Also concerning the Public Notice, you directed that the Daily Sentinel would be the appropriate paper for publication of the Public Notice, even though the hearing is in Glenwood Springs before the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners, because of the proximity of the subject property to Grand Junction and the general circulation of the Daily Sentinel in the area of the property. 2 I have mailed a copy of the Public Notice to all of those landowners named in the list provided to your office under cover of a letter to Fred Mark L. Bean Garfield County Building & Planning Department December 12, 2005 Page 2 Jarman dated September 23, 2005 from my partner, Sam Starritt. I have also mailed the same Notice to the Grand Junction offices of the BLM and Forest Service, as well as to #12 Enterprises, Ltd., which are not shown on that list. 3. The Notice for posting enclosed in your November 29, 2005 letter has been, and will continue to be, posted on the property in accordance with the specifics of your letter. 4. I enclose 14 copies of the completed application. We have discussed by phone that this is a somewhat unusual application because of the nature of the property and the use. Therefore, each copy of the application consists of the following materials: My letter to Fred Jarman dated November 5, 2004, with attachments My letter to Fred Jarman dated February 19, 2005, with attachments Mailing list of surface and mineral interest owners attached to Sam Starritt's letter to Fred Jarman dated September 23, 2005 (I have omitted the cover letter because it does not add any substantive information) Letter from #10 Enterprises, LLC to Fred Jarman dated September 19, 2005 authorizing our firm to act as its agent concerning this application (again I have omitted the cover letter delivering this to Fred Jarman dated September 23, 2005, signed by my assistant, Sherri Jack) The Public Notice described above. Please contact me immediately if you feel I have omitted anything from the application materials or have otherwise failed to comply with the requirements of your November 29, 2005 letter. Thank you for your continuing cooperation and assistance. Best wishes for the holidays. Sir�ly, Richard H. Krohn RHK/saj Enclosures cc: Buzz Cox (High Lonesome Lodge) (w/encls.) Paul Vahldiek, Jr. (#10 Enterprises) (w/encls.) FAS YS\ W p\8667\005\Bean-Cf R.wpd Garfield County Richard H. Krohn Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, LLP 744 Horizon Court, Suite 300 Grand Junction, CO 81630 BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 29, 2005 RE: Special Use Permit for a Resort for High Lonesome Lodge Dear Mr. Krohn, As a result of a potential conflict of interest, Fred Jarman will not be responsible for processing your Special Use Permit application. I will be the County Planning Department staff member handling the application. I am in receipt of the supplemental information you submitted for your Special Use Permit application submitted on behalf of #10 Enterprises, LLC (aka High Lonesome Lodge) for a Resort. After review, your submittal has been deemed technically complete and the Board of County Commissioners has made the decision not to refer the application to the County Planning Commission. Please understand that a determination of technical completeness shall not be viewed as a recommendation of approval, finding of an adequate application, or a finding of general compliance with any goal or objective of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution. This application will be reviewed by Staff and a report will be sent to you. The Board of County Commissioners will discuss and review the application at a public hearing scheduled on January 16, 2006 at 1:15 PM. The meeting- will be held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room in the Garfield County Plaza Building, 108 8th St., Glenwood Springs, CO 81601. As a matter of process, this matter requires a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. As the Applicant, you are solely responsible for the publication, property posting, and mailing of all notices for this hearing. As such, you are required to present proof of the publication and mailing at the hearing. The item cannot be heard if 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 correct noticing requirements have not been met. Notice for the meeting shall be given as follows: 1. Notice by publication, including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot, a description of the proposed subdivision and nature of the meeting, and the date, time and place for the hearing shall be given once in a newspaper of general circulation in that portion of the County in which the subject property is located at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date such hearing, and proof of publication shall be presented at hearing by the applicant. 2. Notice by mail, containing information as described under paragraph (I) above, shall be mailed to all owners of record as shown in the County Assessor's Office of lots within two hundred feet (200') of the subject lot, all owners of mineral interest in the subject property, and all tenants of any structure proposed for conversion to condominiums, at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such hearing time by certified return receipt mail, and receipts shall be presented at the hearing by the applicant. 3. The site shall be posted such that the notice is clearly and conspicuously visible from a public right-of-way, with notice signs provided by the Planning Department. The posting must take place at least thirty (30) but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the hearing date and is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the notice, and ensure that it remains posted until and during the date of the hearing. Enclosed is the appropriate notice and "posting sheet "for the Board of County Commissioners meeting. Note: Please submit 14 copies of the completed application to this office no later than December 16, 2005. If the copies have not been submitted by this date, your public hearing may be jeopardized. Do not hesitate to contact this office in the event you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark L. Bean, Director Garfield County Building & Planning Department PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that #10 Enterprises, LLC has applied to the Board of County Commissioners, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to approve a Special Use Permit for a Resort, in connection with the following described property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado; to -wit: Legal Description: See attached Practical Description: Approximately 5 miles northwest of DeBeque off of County Road 200 Said Special Use Permit is to allow the petitioners operate a Resort for up to 35 guests on the property All persons affected by the proposed Special Use Permit are invited to appear and state their views, support or objections. If you cannot appear personally at this hearing, then you may state your views by letter, as the County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners and others affected by the proposed Special Use Permit. This application may be reviewed at the office of the Planning Department, located at 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Garfield County Courthouse annex, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The public hearing on the application before the County Commissioners has been set for the 16th day of January, 2006, at the hour of 1:15 p.m., at the Office of the County Commissioners, Garfield County Courthouse, Suite 100, 108 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. Planning Department Garfield County NOTICE TAKE NOTICE That OM te£VTeiePalses' LIi has applied to the 4664 RD MC Gociar/ eGsn,Se,o,144C Garfield, County pte opt/ 3 02.03 etc ME 6,F1b away 2oa*t ~720.4., ♦ 4r 4 #S 0 to allow: ,ne. A ge),ers ib gacirSt 6' 35 46,6575 S7 ,64 r? sM,4/..L- 44 fre ,4nv , Aeti on this property. A public Anil? on this pplicati n will be held in the A'i/.S/@�'i? r /00, /08 ,Tintar Glenwood Springs, Colorado on 01 09000, /O f 4C. (date) f� at 0./' '. Imo. (time) Date Notice Was Posted: By: For additional information, contact the at vs ern- , 108 8th St. Suite 20/ , Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 `v Garfield County Richard H. Krohn Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, LLP 744 Horizon Court, Suite 300 Grand Junction, CO 81630 BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 12, 2004 RE: Special Use Permit for a Resort for High Lonesome Lodge Dear Richard, I am in receipt of the Special Use Permit application you submitted on behalf of #10 Enterprises, LLC (aka High Lonesome Lodge) for a Resort. After an initial review, your submittal appears to be deficient in content. As a result, it has been determined to be technically incomplete. Please respond more specifically to the following deficiencies so that this office may continue to review the application: A. The application requires an Applicant to submit, in narrative form, the nature and character of the Special Use requested. Submit plans and supporting information (i.e. letters from responsible agencies). Include specifications for the proposed use including, but not limited to, the hours of operation, the number and type of vehicles accessing the site on a daily, weekly and/or monthly basis, and the size and location of any existing and/or proposed structures that will be used in conjunction with the proposed use, and provisions for electric power service and any other proposed utility improvements. Be specific. Your narrative does not describe the physical nature (size and layout) of the individual structures to be used in conjunction with the resort. Please address this concem. Because the structures are not in one concise compound, photographs may be helpful here. B. Submit a copy of the appropriate portion of a Garfield County Assessor's Map showing all mineral rights owners of the subject property and public and private landowners adjacent to your property (which should be delineated). In additional, 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 Once you have provided a response or submitted the appropriate materials requested in this letter, this office will begin a substantive review of the application and place it on an agenda for a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. I look forward to your next set of submittal materials. Should you have additional questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Fred A. Jarman, AICP, ° nior Planner 970.945.8212 DUFFORD WALDECK 1.,MILBURN & KROHN LLP Attorneys at Law Betty C. Bechtel William N.T. Frey Nathan A. Keever Richard H. Krohn Christopher G. McAnany` Laird T. Milburn Michael C. Santo Sam D.Starrittt Michael A. Kuzminski* John R. Pierce+ William G. Waldeck Retired • Flint B. Ogle Of Counsel • D. J. Dufford (1919-1998) • +Also Admitted in Oregon 'Also Admitted In Utah tAlso Admitted In Wyoming GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 744 Horizon Court Suite 300 Grand Junction Colorado 81506 TEL 970.241.5500 FAX 970.243.7738 MONTROSE, COLORADO TEL 970.249.4500 MOAB, UTAH Moab, Utah TEL 435,259.2225 www.dwmk.com dwmk@dwmk,com TINED NOV TS.,E1 ,- NGV 0 9 2094 November 5, 2004 Fred Jarman 8L,"rf D!i'dG J, i' A Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8°i Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: High Lonesome Lodge Resort Special Use Permit Application Dear Fred: Please consider this letter and its enclosures as the application by #10 Enterprises, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, doing business as High Lonesome Lodge for a resort Special Use Permit application as defined in Section 2.02.448 of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations. There are a number of attachments to this letter which form part of the application, and the contents of this letter constitute the narrative associated with the application. The Garfield County Special Use Permit application form is attached. The subject property consists of approximately 13,000 acres of fee land owned by #10 Enterprises, LLC. The owner is also the holder of BLM grazing permits for approximately 20,000 acres of adjoining or nearby acreage. The property is used for agricultural and guiding—outfitting uses. The approximate area associated with the buildings utilized in connection with the guest ranch functions is 30 to 50 acres. The property is located northwest of DeBeque, Colorado, and surrounded primarily by BLM land in the far western portion of Garfield County, mainly along the north Dry Fork Creek drainage and McKay Fork (south Dry Fork) drainage. The application is for a resort operation under Section 2.02.448 of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations. The purpose of the resort would be to lodge and feed paying guests for big game and small game hunting and for fishing. A site plan of the property is attached showing the general topographical features of the property and surrounding areas. A separate site plan is also attached showing the approximate location of the major buildings utilized in the resort operation. The operation would consist of 35 guest beds. Guests would be housed on a daily or weeklybasis, either arriving at High Lonesome Lodge in their private vehicles or picked up from connecting transportation hubs by employees ofthe ranch. Operation ofthe resort is year-round, but the majority of use will take place during big game hunting seasons from August through November of each year. Staff is on site 24 hours a day when guests are present. The number and type of vehicles accessing the property on a daily basis for resort purposes will be approximately four to eight SUVs and pickups. The property is also a working ranch, so it will Fred Jarman November 5, 2004 Page 2 also be used and occupied year-round by employees for those functions. Those same employees will also provide services associated with the resort uses of the property. Domestic water is provided from springs on the property decreed by Priority No. 114B out of Boldt Ditch dated June 1, 1905. The Augmentation Plan in Case No. 02CW 195 (Water Division No. 5) attached to this application further describing the water rights utilized. Waste water disposal will be handled by a separate ISDS for each building. For all buildings described in this application, domestic water delivery systems and ISDS systems are already in existence as of the date of this application. Dining facilities will be provided by applicant's employees in the existing cook house and dining room on the property. These facilities are also used for ranch purposes. The guest ranch functions associated with this resort Special Use Permit application will be operated in conjunction with the existing Special Use Permit previously granted by Garfield County fora shooting range facility and existing guide—outfitting operations. All of these Special Use Permit activities will occur concurrently with existing agricultural operations currently being undertaken by the applicant on the property and adjoining public land covered by grazing permits held by the applicant. The guest ranch facilities which are the subject of this resort application will be available to fee paying guests. The purpose is for those guests to visit and enjoy the scenic and recreational opportunities of this area of Garfield County, including particularly hunting and fishing activities and the availability of shooting on the associated shooting range facility. Existing ranch and public roads will be utilized in association with the resort uses of the property. No street improvements are contemplated because of the minimal additional traffic generated by this additional use. Our firm's check in the amount of $400.00 for the Special Use Permit application fee is enclosed. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information to process and act on this application. RHK/saj Enclosures cc: Buzz Cox (w/enol.) F:\SYS\ Wp\866TOONarman-LTR.wpd #10 ENTERPRISES, LLC 5701 Woodway Drive Houston, TX 77057 September 19, 2005 Fred Jarman Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: High Lonesome Lodge Resort Special Use Permit Application Dear Mr. Jarman: This letter will confirm Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, L.L.P., is authorized to act as our agent concerning our special use permit application for a resort for High Lonesome Lodge near Debeque, Colorado. E OURDE ENGINEERING I N C Collin Kenny Building Construction and Maintenance Manager #10 Enterprises, LLC PO Box 88 DeBeque, CO 81630 RE: #10 Enterprises, LLC Kennel Water Supply Sufficiency 5/27/2009 Dear Collin: In compliance with Section 7-104 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution adopted January 1, 2009, this letter summarizes the opinion and findings of Resource Engineering, Inc. RESOURCE) regarding the adequacy of the physical and legal water supply for the proposed kennel. Findings and Opinion The well drilled to serve the kennel is adequate in both quantity and quality. The well is capable of reliably and continuously pumping a minimum of 15 gallons per minute (gpm), the maximum pumping rate allowed under a domestic exempt well permit. This is approximately 85 times the estimated demand of the kennel. The minimal groundwater withdrawal will have negligible impact on the regional groundwater resource. Water quality testing for basic Colorado Primary Drinking Water Standards finds that the water quality is high in sodium, magnesium, sulfate, dissolved solids, hardness, and manganese, constituents all common to the ground water of the area. Treatment is strongly recommended. Recommended treatment includes manganese removal and softening of all water pumped from the well and reverse osmosis treatment for drinking water provided for human or animal consumption. The well has been awarded domestic, exempt well permit #280717 by the Colorado Division of Water Resources. The allowed uses include fire protection, ordinary household uses in up to three single family dwellings, the watering of poultry, domestic animals and livestock on a farm or ranch and the irrigation of not more than one acres of gardens and lawns. The permit is appropriate for the intended uses. These conclusions and opinions have been reached on the basis of a 24 hour well pumping test, water quality testing by Grand Junction Laboratories and issuance of the well permit by the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Well Construction The kennel well was constructed in late February, 2009 by Shelton Drilling, Corporation under monitoring and observation well permit No. 279876. The well is 95 feet deep and Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists 909 Colorado Avenue M GI3nwood Springs, CO 91 601 a (970) 945-6777 12 Fax (970)945-1137 Mr. Collin Kenny, 5/27/2009 Building Construction and Maintenance Manager Page 2 of 4 #10 Enterprises, LLC is completed with 7 5/8" steel surface casing and 5 inch PVC production casing. Slotted casing was installed in the producing zone from 75— 95 feet below the top of the surface casing. At the time of drilling the static water level was 56 feet from the top of the well casing (TOC). A two hour pump test was conducted by Samuelson Pump Co. on March 2, 2009 which concluded that the well was capable of 21 gallons per minute (gpm) with total drawdown of 2.8 feet. 24 Hour Pump Test A 24 Hr. pump test was conducted under the direction of Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) on April 17 and18, 2009. The pump was set approximately 68 feet below the top of casing. The initial water level was 54.84 feet below the TOC. The pumping rate was adjusted over the first 10 minutes of the test. After 10 minutes the pumping rate was a constant 15.5 gpm. Drawdown data was collected at 1 minute intervals during pumping and recovery using a pressure transducer and data logger. Hand data was collected for the first 30 minutes using a well sounder. The drawdown in the well during the pumping period is shown in Figures 1 and 2. The maximum drawdown was 1.76 feet (56.60' from TOC) after 573 minutes of pumping. The pump was off from 573 — 599 minutes after which time pumping resumed. The data suggests that the total drawdown at the end of the 24 hour test might have been approximately 1.9 feet had the pump run continuously. The majority of the drawdown occurred in the first 5 minutes of the test; there was only 0.17 feet of drawdown from 5 minutes to the maximum drawdown of 1.76 feet at 573 minutes. At the end of the test approximately 38 feet of water remained in the well This is a large safety margin against the well pumping dry. Over the 24 hour pumping period 22,180 gallons was pumped. This is 85 times the a maximum estimated daily demand of 260 gallons for the kennel (see Demand section below) Figure 3 depicts the water level recovery in the well in the 24 hours after pumping ceased. The well approached, but did not reach complete recovered at T/T' = 2 indicating that, at the time of the test, the well is not completely recharged at a rate equal or greater than the 15.5 gpm pumping rate. This is typical of wells situated in aquifers that are seasonally recharged. The well can be expected to drawdown for most of the year and then recover during snowmelt or rainfall events. The majority of water wells in Western Colorado exhibit this behavior. RESOURCE NGINEIERING INC Mr. Collin Kenny, 5/27/2009 page 3 of 4 Building Construction and Maintenance Manager #10 Enterprises, LLC Water Demand The kennel will house up to 46 dogs. Two caretakers will care for the dogs. There will be sanitary facilities for the caretakers and washdown capability for the kennel. Wastewater will be treated in a septic system. The kennel washdown system will use a water treatment and recovery system so the water is recycled and reused for washdown. Only makeup water is required for the washdown which makes the entire kennel operation very water efficient. The maximum annual kennel demand has been conservatively estimated to be 94,900 gallon per year (260 gallons per day) based on the following assumptions: i. 2 caretakers @ 15 gal/day ii. 46 dogs @ 5 gal/day. The majority of this demand is allocated to washdown with the conservative assumption that there is no recycling system. With the recycling system annual demand is estimated to be approximately 30,000 to 50,000 gallons per year, or an average of 0.6 to 0.1 gallons per minute. This is far below the domestic exempt well permit limitation of 15 gallons per minute. Water Quality A water quality sample was obtained approximately 30 minutes after starting the 24 hour test and submitted to Grand Junction Laboratories for analysis. The water is typical of the groundwater in the area, exhibiting high levels of sodium, magnesium, sulfate, dissolved solids, hardness, and manganese. Turbidity was also high, although this is common in new wells and is expected to decrease over time. Water treatment is strongly recommended. Appropriate treatment is likely to include manganese removal and softening for all water pumped from the well plus reverse osmosis treatment of all water used as potable water for both humans and animals. Summary and Conclusions • The kennel well is an excellent well and more than adequate to reliably supply the amount of water required by the kennel. • The water quality is typical of groundwater in the area and, with common, readily available treatment, is adequate for human and animal consumption. Treatment including manganese removal and softening for all water pumped and reverse osmosis for drinking water is strongly recommended. • The well permit is appropriate for the intended uses. The well has been awarded domestic, exempt well permit #280717 by the Colorado Division of Water RESOURCE NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN INC Mr. Collin Kenny, 5/27/2009 Building Construction and Maintenance Manager Page 4 of 4 #10 Enterprises, LLC Resources. The allowed uses include fire protection, ordinary household uses in up to three single family dwellings, the watering of poultry, domestic animals and livestock on a farm or ranch and the irrigation of not more than one acres of gardens and lawns. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, — ok noo Re'll RESOURCE ENGINESi att s,�11 ,i r -, P%'• 0 • i/ John M. Currier, P.E�t1s� 'OHnt'Er+o\rC Water Resources EngiAar‘\%.-"--- JMC/jmc file:848-1.9 attachments EEEEE E N G I N E E P N G. INC. RESOURCE Pumping Time (minutes) O 0 O N0 (O CO O N V (OO OW O O O O O (;bap) UMOpMBJO 0u Ul W 0 N Pumping Time (minutes) O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 o 4 o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O N CO V' N (.0 r.- (301 '-(001 wo.i;;aa;) UMOpMeJQ O O O 0) z tl u 0) 0 O O O O 0 O O to o to 0 N O O O N N M O O 0 0 0 O (pap UMopM2JQ ienpr e j O M N i _0) tL Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 #10 ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 88 DEBEQUE, CO 81630- EXST WELL PERMIT NUMBER 280717 DIV. 5 WD70 DES. BASIN MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 9 Township 8 S Range 98 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1117 Ft. from North Section Line 2210 Ft. from East Section Line (970) 283-9420 UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone:13 NAD831 CHANGE/EXPANSION OF USE:OF AN EXISTING WELL Easting: Northing: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 37.3 acres (37.93 acres less Garfield County Road 200, Right -of -Way of approximately 0.63 acres) described as that portion of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, Sec. 9, Twp. 8 South, Rng. 98 West, 6th P.M., Garfield County, more particularly described on the attached exhibit A. Well location address being 4400 County Road 200, DeBeque, CO 81630. 4) Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, an existing well, constructed on February 23, 2009, to a depth of 95 feet, under permit no. 279876 (canceled). Issuance of this permit hereby cancel permit no. 279876. 5) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside not more than three (3) single family dwellings, the watering of poultry, domestic animals and livestock on a farm or ranch and the irrigation of not more than one (1) acre of home gardens and lawns. This well is known as Kennel Parcel Well (aka Kennel Location #2 Well). 6) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 8) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2443-091-00-001 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R290151 (totaling 200 acres) APPROVED DMW State En Receipt No. 9503224B %-- 15 . zr B DATE ISSUED 05-21-2009 By DATE JRA JOHN C. KEPHART & CO J JII ARRA' R S 435 NORTH AVENUE ♦ PHONE: (970) 242-7618 4 FAX (970) 243 7235 ♦ GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501 Received from: — ANALYTICAL REPORT — High Lonesome Ranch, #10 Enterprises, Collin PO Box 88 DeBeque, CO 81630 970-283-9420, 812-6731 cell, 970-283-1152 F 8377 Customer No. Laboratory No. Sample Kenney water 4/17/09 5/22/09 Date Received Date Reported Lab number Sample ID Arsenic(As) Barium(Ba) Cadmium(Cd) Chromium(Cr) Fluoride(F) Lead(Pb) Mercury(Hg) Nitrate(N) Selenium(Se) Silver(Ag) Color(Co/Pt unit) pH Conductivity@25 deg. C Sodium(Na) Calcium(Ca) Magnesium(Mg) Potassium(K) Chloride(C1) Sulfate(SO4) Phenol. Alkalinity(CaCO3) Total Alkalinity(CaCO3) Bicarbonate(HCO3) Carbonate(CO3) Dissolved Solids Hardness (CaCO3) Turbidity(NTU) Boron(B) Copper(Cu) Iron(Fe) Manganese(Mn) Molybdenum(Mo) Ammonia(N) Phosphate(P) Zinc(Zn) Total Coliform Bacteria 8377 Limits, Public Supplies, Kennel 4/17/09 by Colo. Dept. Health 12:15, C. Kenney 0.000 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 0.0027 mg/1 0.001 mg/1 0.16 mg/1 0.000 mg/1 0.00000 mg/1 1.90 mg/1 0.010 mg/1 0.0000 mg/1 0 7.30 5260 umhos/cm 670 mg/1 204 mg/1 263 mg/1 8.8 mg/1 14 mg/1 2450 mg/1 0 mg/1 530 mg/1 641 mg/1 0 mg/1 4050 mg/1 1590 mg/i 44 0.26 mg/1 0.012 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 0.204 mg/1 0.032 mg/1 0.17 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 0.024 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 2.0 mg/1 0.005 mg/1 0.1 mg/1 4 mg/1 0.015 mg/1 0.002 mg/1 10.0 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 no official 6.5-8.5 no official 20 mg/1 no official 125 mg/1 no official 250 mg/1 250 mg/1 no official no official no official no official 500 mg/1 200 mg/1 1 no official 1.3 mg/1 0.3 mg/1 0.05 mg/1 no official no official no official 5.0 mg/1 limit acceptable limit limit limit limit limit limit limit limit limit limit limit 0 col/100m1 must be less than See notes on next page. Lab Dir.: Brian S. Bauer 1 JRA JOHN C. KEPHART & CO. J 711 LA 435 NoRTH AVENUE • PHONE: (970) 242-7618 • FAX 243-7235 • GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501 NOTES on sample # 8377 Kennel 4/17/09 12:15, C. Kenney Your water tests show levels outside public water supply limits for Sodium, Magnesium, Sulfate, Dissolved Solids, Hardness, Turbidity and Manganese. The Sodium level may be of concern to those restricting dietary Sodium; for each liter of water, 670 milligrams of Sodium would be consumed. Magnesium is a mineral salt contributing to Hardness and overall salt content. The Sulfate may cause gastro-intestinal problems if much water is consumed. The Dissolved Solids reading indicates the water is higher in overall salt content than recommended for drinking and household use. Hard water can leave mineral deposits and lessen effectiveness of soaps. Turbidity can interfere with disinfection. Manganese is similar to Iron, and can cause stains on surfaces and in laundry. Not all factors which might be harmful were tested, but the analysis performed covers many common problems. The Conductivity indicates that overall salt content is too high for many plants. 6MP'1191HX3 NOI1 AVd b1H\suq Uzi\bMP\ONIddV LK) —go \Ba OZ\sau avov\ 0 W e cn W � W • „ Hi E” p 0 ZWg 0 H r,4H H g Q�� cI PW-,rWQ Q � � pH QCT cr.) O • U� W J U N T'7S, R99W.:1: S4,T7S,R')') FORT COLLINS CONSOLIDATED ROYAL IES, INC. PROJECT SITE PROPOSED PAVILION PROJECT BL1V k 9 civ e SECTION BLM TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH RA ,99 WEST. S10, T7S, R199W LM 0 1500 3000 SCALE (FEET) LEG ND PROPE TY LINE SECTION S OAD EAM KIMBALL CREEK RANCH HEADQUARTERS AERIAL IMAGE AND PROPERTY LINE DATA TAKEN FROM THE GARFIELD COUNTY GIS DATABASE. PROPERTY LINES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE FOR BOUNDARY USES. flL Thr High Lanrsame find EYACTLY 6S WILD AS vat WSMT. X SECTION: 9 TOWNSHIP: 7S RANGE: 99W DESIGNER:RML DRAWN BYRM F-BLM IMRPAVILION PROJECT SITE MAP DeBEQUE, CO FIGURE 2 PROJECT #:08-007.4 DATE: 3/2009 SITE MAP R. 26 E. R. 102 W. R. 101 W. R. 100 W. R. 99 W. R. 98 W. R. 97 W. N 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 1 Scale in miles 1229 North 23rd Street, Suite 201 • Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 (970) 241-6027 • Fax: (970) 256-7992 www.rhinoengineers.com • email: reinc23@gwest.net April 14, 2009 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Individual Sewage Disposal System Kimball Creek Lodge The High Lonesome Ranch To Building and Planning Department: The design for the individual sewage disposal system, located at The High Lonesome Ranch, accessed via Garfield County Road #202, north of Debeque, Colorado, is attached. The site is located about 8 miles from the Roan Creek Road turnoff. The design includes wastewater projections for Ranch guests and staff employees for temporary stays. The design includes a seepage bed design, utilizing native soils where possible. The surface two feet of existing soils shall be excavated prior to the placement of gravels and piping. Existing soils will be used for the "cap" over the system. Perc tests were completed by Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC in February 2009. The soils vary from silty sands with gravels to clayey sands with gravels. Because of the satisfactory pert test results, the geotechnical engineers recommend utilizing native soils. The enclosed wastewater design is based on this recommendation. There is no seasonal water table that affects this 1SDS system. If you have any questions, please call me at 970-241-6027. Sincerely, RHINO ENGINEERING, INC. By: John E. Kornfeld, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures xc: Jason Frey, Mountain Estates Builders File: Wastewater Design/Kimball Creek Lodge at The High Lonesome Ranch Serving Colorado, Utah & Nevada Wastewater Design Data Sheet Kimball Creek Lodge The High Lonesome Ranch Percolation Test Results The report discussing percolation tests that were performed by Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC is dated February 26, 2009. The soils included silty sands with gravels and organics at the surface to silty sands with gravels to clayey sands with gravels in the underlying layers. The surface soils are about one and one-half feet in thickness. Three (3) test pit locations were explored to determine percolation tests. TP -1 had perc results at the surface of 5 minutes/inch; the 3 feet depth had perc results of 22.2 minutes/inch; and the 6 feet depth had perc rates of 11.8 minutes/inch. TP -2 had perc results at the surface of 12.5 minutes/inch; the 3 feet depth (15.1 minutes/inch). TP -3 had perc results at the surface of 2.8 minutes/inch; at the 3 feet depth (13.7 minutes/inch). Pert test results are attached. The soils are not affected by a seasonal water table or groundwater. Groundwater was not encountered during the excavation. Per recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report, the existing soils are suitable for onsite sewage disposal. Design Data According to Table 1 "Quantities and BOD Strength of Sewage for Various Types of Uses" of Garfield County Building and Planning Department, the following are calculations for sewage flow. A total of 8 tents are planned. A maximum of 16 people (guests) or 2 guests per tent are estimated at any given time. Three (3) staff employees are anticipated during the guests stay to maintain operations for the clients. According to Table I, the following are the anticipated demands: A rate of 75 gallons/per/day/person is to be estimated. This includes 19 people per day, or a total of 1,425 gallons per day (19 people x 75 gallon per person). The absorption area should be based on the maximum flow. The maximum flow shall be considered as 150 percent of the average flow. Therefore, 1,425 gpd x 150% = 2,138 gpd. The absorption area formula is: A = [Q x (t)w] / 5, where A is the minimum absorption area in square feet, Q is the design flow of sewage in gpd, and t is the percolation rate in minutes per inch. The proposed design is based on 22 minutes per inch, which is the slowest perc rate encountered in any of the test pits. Using 22 minutes per inch and the above variables, A = [2,138 x (22)1/2] / 5 = 2,006 square feet. In addition, assume a clothes washing machine and garbage disposal are available at the lodge, an additional 60% should be added to the absorption area. Therefore, 2,006 square feet + 60% = 3,210 square feet. Absorption System Seepage Bed System Assume 6 perforated pipes, with a 6' separation from center to center, and 3 feet from the outside pipe to the edge of the seepage bed. Therefore, the width of the seepage bed is 36 feet. If the width is 36 feet, then the minimum length of the seepage bed will be 3,210/36 = 89.2 feet or 90 feet. If a different configuration is required or horizontal space is a consideration, an 8 perforated pipe lateral system could be constructed. Should this be the case, the width of the seepage bed is 48 feet, and the overall length would be 67 linear feet (3,210 minimum length required/48 feet wide). It is imperative that the system is not Tess than 6 laterals as the maximum length of any lateral permitted is less than 100 linear feet. Supplemental Specifications and Construction Requirements The contractor shall comply with the Garfield County Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Regulations, latest edition, with the following supplemental provisions and/or construction requirements: 1. The building sewer to septic tank pipe shall be four (4) inches in diameter. 2. The minimum size of septic tank shall be 1250 gallons. Two septic tanks are shown; one for the lodge and the other for the bathhouse. 3. The minimum distance between the septic tank and the seepage bed shall be 12 feet. 4. Two (2) feet of soil shall be excavated, followed by scarifying the top 6 inches of soil at the two feet depth. (It would also be acceptable to excavate only one foot of soils should the owner desire the finished grade of the seepage bed to be one foot above the adjacent natural soils. By doing so, a "raised bed" would route stormwater runoff away from the seepage bed. The drawback would be the "visible" location of the bed unless the slopes were tapered sufficiently to create a natural condition.) The gravels and piping of the seepage bed will be placed on top. 5. Twelve inches (12") of soil, either native or imported, shall be added after the gravel layer is placed. The top of the soil shall be sloped to allow rainfall to runoff or drain away from the seepage bed. It is recommended that the center of the topsoil is 18 inches thick, and tapered to a 12 inch layer around the edges. Note that the topsoil shall be sloped to match existing elevations at approximately a 3 to 1 slope. 6. The contractor shall notify the Garfield County Inspector and/or the Registered Professional Engineer when the pipe and gravel installation is completed and prior to the soil top dressing is applied. This is to insure the correct dimensions of the seepage and the installation of the distribution box and piping. At least 48 hours notice is required. 7. The Engineer (970-241-6027) and/or the Garfield County Building & Planning Department (970-384-5003) shall be notified for the final inspection. At least 48 hours notice is required. 8. The contractor has the option of replacing the conventional perforated pipe and gravel system with an "infiltrator system". Should this option be exercised, all components must be installed per the manufacturer's recommendations. 9. All setbacks are measured from the toeslope of the topsoil cap — not from the edge of the seepage bed. 0 N 0 N 00 op co N \ \ , \ \N NN ��`v Ao N N V vv Gg \ 9�9 \ \ N % 0 N \\,� \ \ �.\ 9\ N. \ . N \ V N V A_ V A \N. N. A v V A N V \ 9 \ \\ A SRV vq \ N A A \ N N N. \ \ \ N A v. 4::;Av k V N A \ \ \\ \N \N \\ �', �',.�...A �\ \V A\ \ .``\N. \ C \ V A m v v v v N v v N \ V A } N \ \ \ \ \ vV� V \ \(:)(--:_ \ \ \ \ \ $m \ \ ao \ \. \ \ cN \ \ \ A V A 11'S\ :.A V A A V V A A �\ V A A \ \ \ \ \V cv A A ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ A A\ \ \ \ \ \ v \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ i\ co m co H gri �, z • k INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SITE PLAN mat Wo. 28071.02 KIMBALL CREEK LODGE THE HIGH LONESOME RANCH CARFIELD CR #200 RHINO ENGINEERING, INC. 1229 N. 23rd STREET SUITE 201 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 SHEET 3 W W q ocoO V CO• /u�1 CO l W [Ez1[ NF • (-1 ca O u a CD Wc6 i'dvp 00 N°0000 goo00 000 9 o0 0000000 0 1°di'00000 0 0001000 �dpbo0 ido000 prpb hknn o00 hl<I to 0-2 dfc DO h--- INDIVIDUAL ` NO SEASONAL WATER TABLE SEEPAGE BED DETAIL EXISTING SOIL PROFILE INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SOIL REPLACEMENT DETAILS Prat No. 28091.02 KIMBALL CREEK LODGE THE HIGH LONESOME RANCH GARFIELD CR #200 RHINO ENGINEERING, INC. 1229 N. 23rd STREET SUITE 201 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 SHEET 3 SEEPAGE BED DETAILS O rn 0 0 0 0 11-- W > W W O Z w v- O m O 0> aZ J Qa a W 0 WI/16 a LI 0 Z D WidQUO a D al, Olio oz� �OW R 1- .�wp az wE a O ¢ aW p. OOaI-UJ O W JOm O W '��fn0 DOW F U O O W OLI Q a0 Z_W ONO Or j m ZWQ W N V 6foW S W WSZ0 Wwu. -.11--0 Z IS -W(0)0! • O O WI-- Q O J a W 0 S a J N N m0 6�J6 ~ a-a'U' W O ¢z az�m m �w aa�0 aW" amz - o -'azo N.W.. OlWjzP Wm O WOI-F6 fax° O s-.00LE J J Oo aw Pz ....4-------> 00w0 t mO0 o¢wF aOJOm^ONOWZ I - z rZ1a1 F _ razz 6.-{t7) OF06 NF e W W030 J'a, W> O41WSSD-96e0 JWH=wWZ QO a. >~ WD O Q a 0 2 N Y 2 3 0 z O W E E 00.°01 -01 -E O O W a: y200, -00) m O J d 1-0 a N 0 W W 0 0 m SS W 1- W J O O W X Fa:W0<<1-aw<0606O WO 0 W z.NMO N 6 NO 6 a N yj z 0oo 0 0 Z I - 1 O m W Z W <1-0- E >0- O o 00 Z p N Fav az r O 0 TO BUILDING SEWER SEPTIC TAN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SEEPAGE BED DETAILS Prat it,. 28041.02 KIMBALL CREEK LODGE THE HIGH LONESOME RANCH CARFIELD CR #200 RHINO ENGINEERING, INC. 1229 N. 23rd STREET SUITE 201 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 SHEET 3 Construction Requirements for Septic Tank and Absorption Field Section 5.4 Connection to Septic Tanks: Pipe meeting ASTM standards D 3034, properly supported to prevent failure by settling, shall extend from the dwelling to the septic tank and at least 6 feet from the outlet invert of the septic tank. Pipe meeting ASTM standard D 1785, Schedule 40, shall be required to be installed when the building sewer, or any portion of the outlet pipe from the septic tank to the distribution or dispersal area, is located under a driveway or under any other area subject to surface activity. There shall be at least two (2) feet of cover over pipe of ASTM standard D 1785, Schedule 40. Pipe of ASTM standard D 1785, Schedule 40 may also be installed where there is less than two (2) feet of cover provided the pipe is encased within at least a 16 gauge corrugated pipe, or within concrete. Section 5.5 Installation of Septic Tank: A. Tanks are to be installed on a solid base and shall be level. The tank shall be installed with removable covers or access openings extended to within 8 inches of finished grade in order to provide access to the inlet and outlet compartments for cleaning and inspection. Roof drains, foundation drains, area drains, or cistern overflows are not to enter the tank or any part of the individual sewage disposal system. B. The building sewer to septic tank pipe shall be laid with a minimum fall of 1/8 inch per foot. Bends in the building sewer shall be limited to 45 -degree ells or long -sweep quarter -bends. Pipe meeting ASTM standard 3034 or pipe of equal or greater strength is required to be installed from the building to the septic tank. The building sewer installation shall meet all the requirements of the current Uniform Plumbing Code. The building sewer to septic tank pipe shall be at least three (3) inches in diameter but shall be no larger in diameter than the inlet invert as originally cast or formed in the septic tank. The inlet and outlet pipes shall be grouted and sealed to the septic tank with waterproof materials. C. All electrical work, equipment, and material shall comply with requirements of the current National Electrical Code. D. Backfilling around a septic tank shall be accomplished in a manner to prevent settlement and to avoid undue strain on the tank and pipes entering and leaving the tank. E. Abandoned septic tanks and vaults shall be pumped and filled with soil, or they shall be removed and the excavation filled and compacted to the existing grade. F. A cleanout shall be installed, outside of the building and as close to the building as possible, to allow cleaning equipment to be utilized. A cleanout shall be required for each 100 feet of sewer line between the building and the septic tank. G. No compartment of a septic tank may be utilized as a pumping chamber when a pump is required in the system design. Section 5.9 Seepage Beds A. Seepage beds shall be constructed with a length not exceeding 100 feet, a width greater than 3 feet, and a depth not exceeding 3 feet (unless approved by the Health Officer). A 12 inch layer of I inch to 2 '/z inch clean gravel, rock or similar aggregate having individual components of uniform size, shall be distributed evenly over the entire bed, with pipe lines set at a depth to insure at least 6 inches of gravel below and 2 inches of gravel above each line. The bottom of the bed shall be level. A covering of untreated building paper, hay, straw, or similar pervious material, shall be placed on top of the gravel, and after final inspection, backfill shall be placed over the bed to a minimum depth of 12 inches. The terminal ends of lines shall be capped unless looped or air vented. B. The outer-most disposal lines in the bed shall be placed no less than 18 inches and not more than 36 inches from the outside bedwalls. For each 6 feet of width, or part thereof, there shall be one perforated distribution line extending the length of the bed to within 18 inches of the bedwalls at either end. Such pipelines shall be spaced so as to evenly distribute the effluent over the entire bed area, and shall be level. All pipes and lines shall be fitted with tight joints which have been glued, connected with friction couplings, are gasketed or are otherwise permanently connected or attached, and the perforations shall be situated to insure even distribution of effluent throughout the bed. A distribution box or other distribution device may be included as part of the seepage bed system. The bed area shall be protected to prevent damage from surface activity or infusion of water from other sources. Huddleston-Bemr Engineering & 'resting, LLC GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION KIMBALL CREEK LODGE HIGH LONESOME RANCH DEBEQUEI COLORADO PROJECT #008IS-0002 HIGH LONESOIVIE RANCH 0215 222 ROAD DEBEQVE, COLORADO 81630 FEBRIJARY 26, 2009 Ilutidleston-Berry Engineeling and Testing, LLC 640 White Avenue Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Truck Traffic BDLA = 20, Structural NUMMI- — d..,6 ALTERNATIVE PAVEMENT SECTION (inches) Itot-Mix Asphalt Pavement CDOT Class 6 Base Course CDOT Class 3 Subbase Course Rigid Pavement TOTAL Full Depth HMA 8.0 S 8.0 A 3.0 16.0 B 4.0 13.0 17.0 C 3.0 6.0 14.0 23.0 Rigid Pavement 6.0 6.0 12.0 For gravel pavements, a minimal of 12 -inches of gravel is recommended. On -Site Sewage Disposal (p. 6) Percolation testing indicated percolations rates of between approximately 2.8 and 22.2 minutes -per -inch in the native sand soils. Therefore, the native sand soils are generally suitable for on-site sewage disposal. 1.3 Proposed Construction The proposed construction is anticipated to consist of a new lodge, African tent structures, a bathhouse, underground water storage tanks, an Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS), utility installation, and pavements. The proposed structures are anticipated to be constructed over reinforced concrete foundations. Foundation loads on the order of 600 to 2,000 pounds per linear foot wall loads and 8 to 20 kip column loads are expected. 2.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION The subsurface investigation consisted of five test pits and one boring. The test pits were excavated on January 6th, 2009 and the boring was drilled on February 196 , 2009. The locations of the test pits and boring are shown on Figure 1 — Site Plan. The test pits and boring were located in the field relative to existing site features. Typed test pit and boring logs are included in Appendix A. Samples of the subsurface soils were collected during Standard Penetration Testing (SPT), using hand driven brass tubes, and using bulk sampling methods at the locations shown on the logs. The test pits were excavated to depths of between 3.0 and 9.0 feet below the existing ground surface. The boring was drilled to a depth of 26.0 feet. As indicated on the logs, the subsurface conditions at the site were slightly variable. The test pits and boring generally encountered 1.5 feet of silty sand with gravel and organics and silty gravel with sand and organics topsoil above tan, dry, medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel, clayey sand with gravel, and silty gravel with sand. The sand and gravel extended to the bottoms of the test pits. However, in the boring, a layer of gray, dry, hard lean clay with sand was encountered between 15.0 and 20.0 feet below grade. Below the clay, silty sand with gravel extended to the bottom of the boring. Groundwater was not encountered in the test pits or boring at the time of the investigation. 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING Selected soil samples collected from the test pits and boring were tested in the Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing LLC geotechnical laboratory for grain size analysis, natural moisture content, Atterberg limits, soluble sulfates content, and swell/consolidation. The laboratory testing results are included in Appendix B. The laboratory testing results indicate that the native sand and gravel soils at the site range from non -plastic to moderately plastic. In addition, these materials were shown to be slightly collapsible with up to approximately 1.6% collapse measured in the laboratory. The native clay soils encountered in B-1 were shown to be moderately plastic. Water soluble sulfates were detected in the site soils in concentrations as high as 130 parts -per -million (ppm). R52008 ALL PROJECTS1.00S IS - High Lonesome Ranch'00SIS-0002 High Lonesome Ranch ID300- Geo200215•0002 Lodge R012909,doc 2 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Geologic Hazards The primary geologic hazard identified at the site is the presence of slightly collapsible sand and gravel soils. However, the collapse potential is fairly low and this should not preclude development of this site. 4.2 Foundations Based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and nature of the proposed construction, shallow foundations are recommended. Spread footing and monolithic (turndown) structural slab foundations are both appropriate alternatives. However, the native sand soils were indicated to be slightly collapsible. Therefore in order to limit the potential for excessive differential settlements, it is recommended that the load bearing portions of the foundations be constructed above a minimum of 24 -inches of structural fill. The native sand and gravel soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable for reuse as structural fill. The native clay soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill. Imported structural fill should consist of a granular, non -expansive, non -free draining material such as pit -run or CDOT Class 6 base course. However, if the native gravel soils or pit -run is used as structural fill below the foundations, a minimum of six inches of Class 6 base course should be placed on top of the native gravel soils or pit -run to prevent large point stresses on the bottoms of the foundations due to large particles in the gravel/pit-run. Prior to placement of structural fill, it is recommended that the bottoms of the foundation excavations be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 -inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density within ±2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. In addition, it is recommended that HBET be provided the opportunity to observe the excavations to verify that the subsurface conditions are consistent with the results of the subsurface investigation. Structural fill should extend laterally beyond the edges of the foundations a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill. Structural 611 should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 8 -inch loose lids, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density for fine grained soils or modified Proctor maximum dry density for coarse grained soils, within ±2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698 or D1557C, respectively. Pit -nm materials used as structural fill should be proofrolled to the Engineer's satisfaction. W?2008 ALL PROJECTS`00815- High Lonesome Ranch\.008t5.0002 High Lonesome Ranch H+200.Oao`00815.0002 Lodge R012909.doc 3 a ., Pa 0 ;; APPENDIX C Percolation Testing Data PERCOLATION TESTING Project Name: High Lonesome Ranch 11 Testing Conducted By: Pit Dimensions: Length Water Level Depth: SOIL PROFILE A. Sigler Location: DeBeque, CO Project No. 00815-0002 Test Pit No. Lodge TP -3 Date: 1)7/2009 Supervising Engineer: ; Width . Berry Not Encountered X ; Depth 8 ft Remarks 0-1.5 Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry Change (in.) 1.5-8 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (se), trace cobbles, tan, dry, medium dense to dense 5 9,8750 7.7500 10 11.7500 1.8750 15 12.8750 1.1250 Test Number: 1 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 16 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 2.1250 5 9,8750 7.7500 10 11.7500 1.8750 15 12.8750 1.1250 20 13.8750 1.0000 25 14.7500 0.8750 30 15.7500 1.0000 35 EMPTY 0.6250 40 9.6875 0.0625 45 10.0000 0.3125 50 10.3750 0.3750 55 10.5000 0.1250 60 10.7500 0.2500 Rate (min/in): 5 Average Percolation Rate (min/in): Test Number: 2 Top of Hole Depth: 3 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 In Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.8750 5 4.5625 2.6875 10 5.8750 1.3125 15 6.6875 0.8125 20 7.6875 1.0000 25 8.3750 0.6875 30 9.0000 0.6250 35 9.6250 0.6250 40 9.6875 0.0625 45 10.0000 0.3125 50 10.3750 0.3750 55 10.5000 0.1250 60 10.7500 0.2500 Rate (min/in): 22.2 Test Number: 3 Top of Hole Depth: 6 ft Diameter of Hole: 5 in Depth of Hole: 15.5 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.1875 5 4.6875 3.5000 10 6.2500 1.5625 15 7.2500 1.0000 20 8.1250 0.8750 25 9.0000 0.8750 30 9.7500 0.7500 35 10.3750 0.6250 40 10.8750 0.5000 45 11.2500 0.3750 50 11.7500 0.5000 55 12.0625 0.3125 60 12.5000 0.4375 Rate (min/in): 11.8 PERCOLATION TESTING Project Name: High Lonesome Ranch 11 Testing Conducted By: Pit Dimensions: Length Water Level Depth: SOIL PROFILE A. Sigler Location: DeSeque, CO Project No. Test Pit No. Date: 1/7/2009 00815-0002 Lodge TP -4 Supervising Engineer: M. Be ry ; Width Not Encountered X ; Depth 3 ft Remarks _- 0-1.5 Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry Change (in.) 1.5-3 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, brown, dry, medium dense 5 4.3750 3.1250 10 5.7500 1.3750 15 6.6250 0.8750 Test Number: 1 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.2500 5 4.3750 3.1250 10 5.7500 1.3750 15 6.6250 0.8750 20 7.6875 1.0625 25 8.5625 0.8750 30 9.2500 0.6875 35 10.0000 0.7500 40 10.4375 0.4375 45 10.8125 0.3750 50 11.1875 0.3750 55 11.5000 0.3125 60 12.0000 0.5000 Rate (min/in): 12.5 Average Percolation Rate (min/in): Test Number: 2 Top of Hole Depth: 3 ft Diameter of Hole: 6 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.5000 5 3.8125 2.3125 10 5.0625 1.2500 15 5.8750 0.8125 20 6.7500 0.8750 25 7.7500 1.0000 30 8.0000 0.2500 35 8.1875 0.1875 40 8.6875 0.5000 45 9.1250 0.4375 50 9.5000 0.3750 55 9.6250 0.1250 60 10.0625 0.4375 Rate (min/in): 15.1 Test Number: Top of Hole Depth: Diameter of Hole: Depth of Hole: Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (In.) Rate (min/in): PERCOLATION TESTING Project Name: High Lonesome Ranch 11 Testing Conducted By: A. Sigler Location: DeSegue, CO Supervising Engineer: M. 8 Pit Dimensions: Length Not Encountered X ; Width Water Level Depth: SOIL PROFILE tion Project No. Test Pit No. Date: 1/7/2009 00815-0002 odge TP -5 ry Depth 3 ft Remarks 0-1.5 Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry Change (in.) 1.5-3 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, brown, dry, medium dense 5 9.1250 6.6250 10 12.2500 3.1250 15 14.3750 2.1250 Test Number: 1 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 16 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 2.5000 5 9.1250 6.6250 10 12.2500 3.1250 15 14.3750 2.1250 20 15.8750 1.5000 25 EMPTY 0.0625 30 10.2500 0.4375 35 10.5625 0.3125 40 11.0000 0.4375 45 11.3750 0.3750 50 11.6250 0.2500 55 12.0000 0.3750 Rate (min/in): 2.8 Average Percolation Rate (min/in): Test Number: 2 Top of Hole Depth: 3 ft Diameter of Hole: 6 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 3.5000 5 6.6250 3.1250 10 7.7500 1.1250 15 8.6250 0.8750 20 9.7500 1.1250 25 9.8125 0.0625 30 10.2500 0.4375 35 10.5625 0.3125 40 11.0000 0.4375 45 11.3750 0.3750 50 11.6250 0.2500 55 12.0000 0.3750 Rate (min/in): 13.7 Test Number: Top of Hole Depth: Diameter of Hole: Depth of Hole: Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (In.) Rate (min/in): Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION KIMBALL CREEK LODGE HIGH LONESOME RANCH DEBEQUE, COLORADO PROJECT #00815-0002 HIGH LONESOME RANCH 0275 222 ROAD DEBEQUE, COLORADO 81630 FEBRUARY 26, 2009 Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC 640 White Avenue Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A geotechnical investigation was conducted for a proposed new lodge facility at The High Lonesome Ranch near DeBeque, Colorado. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site with respect to on-site sewage disposal, geologic hazards, foundation design, pavement design, and earthwork for the proposed construction. This summary has been prepared to include the information required by civil engineers, structural engineers, and contractors involved in the project. Subsurface Conditions (p. 2) The subsurface investigation consisted of five test pits and one boring. The locations of the test pits and boring are shown on Figure 1 — Site Plan. The test pits and boring generally encountered silty sand with gravel, clayey sand with gravel, and silty gravel with sand soils. However, a lean clay with sand layer was encountered in the boring. Groundwater was not encountered in the test pits or boring at the time of the investigation. The native sand and gravel soils were indicated to range from non -plastic to moderately plastic. In addition, these soils were shown to be slightly collapsible. The native clay soils were indicated to be moderately plastic. Summary of Foundation Recommendations • Foundation Type — Spread Footings or Monolithic Structural Slabs (p. 3) • Structural Fill — Minimum of 24 -inches below foundations. The native soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable for reuse as structural fill. Imported structural fill should consist of pit -run, CDOT Class 6 base course, or other granular material approved by the engineer. (p. 3) • Maximum Allowable Bearing Capacity — 1,500 psf. (p. 4) • Subgrade Modulus — 200 pci for native sand and/or gravel soils and 250 pci for pit -run or CDOT Class 6 base course. (p. 4) • Lateral Earth Pressure — 50 pcf (p. 4) Summary of Pavement Recommendations (p. 5) Automobile Traffic EDLA = 5. Structural Number = 2.75 ALTERNATIVE PAVEMENT SECTION (Inches) Hot -Mix Asphalt Pavement CDOT Class 6 Base Course CDOT Class 3 Subbase Course Rigid Pavement TOTAL Full Depth HMA 7.0 7.0 A 3.0 11.0 14.0 B 4.0 7.0 11.0 C 3.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 Rigid Pavement 6.0 5.0 11.0 Truck Traffic EDLA = 20. Structural Number = 3.50 ALTERNATIVE PAVEMENT SECTION Inches) Hot -Mix Asphalt Pavement CDOT Class 6 Base Course CDOT Class 3 Subbase Course Rigid Pavement TOTAL Full Depth HMA 8.0 8.0 A 3.0 16.0 19.0 B 4.0 13.0 17.0 C 3.0 6.0 14.0 23.0 Rigid Pavement 6.0 6.0 12.0 For gravel pavements, a minimum of 12 -inches of gravel is recommended. On -Site Sewage Disposal (p. 6) Percolation testing indicated percolations rates of between approximately 2.8 and 22.2 minutes -per -inch in the native sand soils. Therefore, the native sand soils are generally suitable for on-site sewage disposal. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Site Location and Description 1 1.3 Proposed Construction 2 2.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 2 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING 2 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 4.1 Geologic Hazards 3 4.2 Foundations 3 4.3 Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork 4 4.4 Lateral Earth Pressures 4 4.5 Drainage 4 4.6 Excavations 5 4.7 Pavements 5 4.8 Water Storage Tanks 6 5.0 ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL 6 6.0 GENERAL 7 FIGURES Figure 1 — Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A — Typed Test Pit and Boring Logs Appendix B — Laboratory Testing Results Appendix C — Percolation Testing Data 1.0 INTRODUCTION Huddleston -Berry ed,ioe, rte As part of extensive development in westem Colorado and surrounding areas, The High Lonesome Ranch near DeBeque proposes to construct a new lodge facility. As part of the development process, Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC (HBET) was retained by The High Lonesome Ranch to conduct a geotechnical investigation at the proposed lodge site. The field investigation, laboratory testing, and analyses were designed to identify most of the geologic hazards common to the area including unstable slopes, swelling or collapsible soils and/or bedrock, soluble sulfates, and shallow groundwater. These issues can impact construction and will be discussed if present. 1.1 Scope As discussed above, a geotechnical investigation was conducted for a proposed new lodge facility at The High Lonesome Ranch near DeBeque, Colorado. The scope of the investigation included the following components: • Conducting a subsurface investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site. ■ Collecting soil samples and conducting laboratory testing to determine the engineering properties of the soils at the site. • Providing recommendations for foundation type and subgrade preparation. • Providing recommendations for bearing capacity. • Providing recommendations for lateral earth pressure. ■ Providing recommendations for drainage, grading, and general earthwork. • Providing recommendations for pavement section alternatives. • Evaluating the site soils for on-site sewage disposal. The investigation and report were prepared by a Colorado registered professional engineer in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The High Lonesome Ranch. 1.2 Site Location and Description The site is located along Kimball Creek Road, northwest of DeBeque, Colorado. At the time of the investigation, the site was open and sloped gently down to the south. It appeared that some site grading had been completed and minimal vegetation was observed. The site was bordered to the north by Kimball Creek Road, to the south by Kimball Creek, and to the east and west by open land. W.\2008 ALL PROJECTS \00815 - High Lonesome Ranch100815-0002 High Lonesome Ranch II\200 - Geo \00815.0002 Lodge R012909.doc 1.3 Proposed Construction The proposed construction is anticipated to consist of a new lodge, African tent structures, a bathhouse, underground water storage tanks, an Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS), utility installation, and pavements. The proposed structures are anticipated to be constructed over reinforced concrete foundations. Foundation loads on the order of 600 to 2,000 pounds per linear foot wall loads and 8 to 20 kip column loads are expected. 2.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION The subsurface investigation consisted of five test pits and one boring. The test pits were excavated on January 6th, 2009 and the boring was drilled on February 19`h, 2009. The locations of the test pits and boring are shown on Figure 1 — Site Plan. The test pits and boring were located in the field relative to existing site features. Typed test pit and boring logs are included in Appendix A. Samples of the subsurface soils were collected during Standard Penetration Testing (SPT), using hand driven brass tubes, and using bulk sampling methods at the locations shown on the logs. The test pits were excavated to depths of between 3.0 and 9.0 feet below the existing ground surface. The boring was drilled to a depth of 26.0 feet. As indicated on the logs, the subsurface conditions at the site were slightly variable. The test pits and boring generally encountered 1.5 feet of silty sand with gravel and organics and silty gravel with sand and organics topsoil above tan, dry, medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel, clayey sand with gravel, and silty gravel with sand. The sand and gravel extended to the bottoms of the test pits. However, in the boring, a layer of gray, dry, hard lean clay with sand was encountered between 15.0 and 20.0 feet below grade. Below the clay, silty sand with gravel extended to the bottom of the boring. Groundwater was not encountered in the test pits or boring at the time of the investigation. 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING Selected soil samples collected from the test pits and boring were tested in the Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing LLC geotechnical laboratory for grain size analysis, natural moisture content, Atterberg limits, soluble sulfates content, and swell/consolidation. The laboratory testing results are included in Appendix B. The laboratory testing results indicate that the native sand and gravel soils at the site range from non -plastic to moderately plastic. In addition, these materials were shown to be slightly collapsible with up to approximately 1.6% collapse measured in the laboratory. The native clay soils encountered in B-1 were shown to be moderately plastic. Water soluble sulfates were detected in the site soils in concentrations as high as 130 parts -per -million (ppm). W:\2008 ALL PROJECTS\00815 - High Lonesome Ranch \00815-0002 High Lonesome Ranch 11\200- Geo\00815-0002 Lodge 8012909 doc 2 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Geologic Hazards The primary geologic hazard identified at the site is the presence of slightly collapsible sand and gravel soils. However, the collapse potential is fairly low and this should not preclude development of this site. 4.2 Foundations Based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and nature of the proposed construction, shallow foundations are recommended. Spread footing and monolithic (turndown) structural slab foundations are both appropriate alternatives. However, the native sand soils were indicated to be slightly collapsible. Therefore in order to limit the potential for excessive differential settlements, it is recommended that the load bearing portions of the foundations be constructed above a minimum of 24 -inches of structural fill. The native sand and gravel soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable for reuse as structural fill. The native clay soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill. Imported structural fill should consist of a granular, non -expansive, non -free draining material such as pit -run or CDOT Class 6 base course. However, if the native gravel soils or pit -run is used as structural fill below the foundations, a minimum of six inches of Class 6 base course should be placed on top of the native gravel soils or pit -run to prevent large point stresses on the bottoms of the foundations due to large particles in the gravel/pit-run. Prior to placement of structural fill, it is recommended that the bottoms of the foundation excavations be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 -inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density within ±2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. In addition, it is recommended that HBET be provided the opportunity to observe the excavations to verify that the subsurface conditions are consistent with the results of the subsurface investigation. Structural fill should extend laterally beyond the edges of the foundations a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill. Structural fill should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 8 -inch loose lifts, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density for fine grained soils or modified Proctor maximum dry density for coarse grained soils, within ±2% of the optimum moisture content as dete„uined in accordance with ASTM D698 or D1557C, respectively. Pit -run materials used as structural fill should be proofrolled to the Engineer's satisfaction. W\2008 ALL PROJECTS \00815 - High Lonesome Ranch \00815.0002 High Lonesome Ranch 11\200 - Geo \00815.0002 Lodge R012909,doc 3 For the foundation building pad prepared as recommended with structural fill consisting of the native soils or imported granular materials, a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 psf may be used. In addition, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 pci may be used for structural fill consisting of the native sand and/or gravel soils. A modulus of 250 pci may be used for structural fill consisting of pit -run or CDOT Class 6 base course. Foundations subject to frost should be at least thirty-six inches below the final grade or insulated to limit the potential for frost heave. As discussed previously, water soluble sulfates were detected in the site soils in a concentration as high as 130 ppm. This concentration of water soluble sulfates represents a negligible degree of potential sulfate attack on concrete exposed to these materials. Therefore, sulfate resistant cement may not be required for construction at this site. 4.3 Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork In order to limit the potential for differential movement of slabs -on -grade, it is recommended that floor slabs and exterior flatwork be constructed above subgrade soils, below the topsoil, that have been scarified to a depth of 9 to 12 -inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density within ±2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. Slabs -on -grade should not be tied into or connected to the foundations in any manner. 4.4 Lateral Earth Pressures Any retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. For backfill consisting of the native sand and/or gravel soils, or imported granular, non -free draining, non -expansive material, we recommend that the walls be designed for an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf in areas where no surcharge loads are present. Lateral earth pressures should be increased as necessary to reflect any surcharge loading behind the walls. 4.5 Drainage In order to improve the long-term performance of the foundations and slabs -on - grade, grading around the structures should be designed to carry precipitation and runoff away from the structures. It is recommended that the finished ground surface drop at least twelve inches within the first ten feet away from the structures. Downspouts should empty beyond the backfill zone. In addition, automatic irrigation is not recommended within five feet of the foundations. As discussed previously, shallow groundwater was not encountered during the subsurface investigation. However, a basement is proposed for the new lodge structure. Therefore, a perimeter foundation drain is recommended. In general, the perimeter drain should consist of geotextile filter fabric surrounding free -draining gravel and perforated pipe. The highest point of the drain pipe should be a minimum of 12 -inches below the bottom of the footing. The drain should slope to daylight or to a sump with a minimum W 92008 ALL PROJECTS \00815 - High Lonesome Ranch 00815-0002 High Lonesome Ranch E\200 - Geo\00815-0002 Lodge R012909.doc 4 uddleston-Be slope of 1.5%. In addition, it is recommended that a drain board, geonet, or other drainage material be installed along the basement walls. Additional, more specific drain recommendations can be developed by HBET, as necessary 4.6 Excavations Excavations in the soils at the site may stand for short periods of time but should not be considered to be stable. Trenching and excavations should be sloped back, shored, or shielded for worker protection in accordance with applicable OSHA standards. The site soils generally classify as Type C soil with regard to OSHA's Construction Standards for Excavations. For Type C soils, the maximum allowable slope in temporary cuts is 1.5H:1 V. 4.7 Pavements The proposed construction is may include asphalt and/or gravel pavements. As discussed previously, the pavement subgrade materials consist primarily of sand and gravel soils. However, due to the slight collapse potential of the native soils, the minimum recommended Resilient Modulus of 3,000 psi will be used for the pavement design. Based upon the subgrade conditions and anticipated traffic loading, asphalt pavement section alternatives were developed in accordance with the Guideline for the Design and Use of Asphalt Pavements for Colorado Roadways by the Colorado Asphalt Pavement Association and concrete pavement alternatives were developed in accordance with AASI-ITO design criteria. The following minimum pavement section alternatives are recommended: Automobile Traffic EDLA = 5, Structural Number = 2.75 ALTERNATIVE PAVEMENT SECTION (Inches) Hot -Mix Asphalt Pavement CDOT Class 6 Base Course CDOT Class 3 Subbase Course Rigid Pavement TOTAL Full Depth HMA 7.0 7.0 A 3.0 11.0 14.0 B 4.0 7.0 11.0 C 3.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 Rigid Pavement 6.0 5.0 11.0 Truck Traffic EDLA = 20, Structural Number = 3.50 ALTERNATIVE PAVEMENT SECTION (Inches) Hot -Mix Asphalt Pavement CDOT Class 6 Base Course CDOT Class 3 Subbase Course Rigid Pavement TOTAL Full Depth HMA 8.0 8.0 A 3.0 16.0 19.0 B 4.0 13.0 17.0 C 3.0 6.0 14.0 23.0 Rigid Pavement 6.0 6.0 12.0 W:52008 ALL PROJECTS \00815. High Lonesome Ranch\00815-0002 High Lonesome Ranch tl1200 - Geo \00815.0002 Lodge R012909 doc 5 Gravel pavement design was conducted in accordance with the FHWA Gravel Roads, Maintenance and Design manual. For gravel pavements at the site, a minimum gravel thickness of 12 -inches is recommended. Prior to pavement placement, areas to be paved should be stripped of all topsoil, fill, or other unsuitable materials. It is recommended that the subgrade soils be scarified to a depth of 12 -inches; moisture conditioned, and recompacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density, within ±2% of optimum moisture content as determined by AASHTO T-99. Aggregate base course and subbase course should be placed in maximum 9 -inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% and 93% of the maximum dry density, respectively, at -2% to +3% of optimum moisture content as determined by AASHTO T-180. In addition to density testing, base course should be proofrolled to verify subgrade stability. It is recommended that Hot -Mix Asphaltic (HMA) pavement conform to CDOT grading SX or S specifications and consist of an approved 75 gyration Superpave method mix design. HMA pavement should be compacted to between 92% and 96% of the maximum theoretical density. An end point stress of 50 psi should be used. In addition, pavements should conform to local specifications. Concrete used in pavements should consist of CDOT Class P concrete or alternative approved by the Engineer. The long-term performance of the pavements is dependent on positive drainage away from the pavements. Ditches, culverts, and inlet structures in the vicinity of paved areas must be maintained to prevent ponding of water on the pavement. 4.8 Water Storage Tanks As discussed previously, underground water storage tanks are proposed at the site. Also as discussed previously, the subsurface materials at the site consisted primarily of sand and gravel soils. In general, these soils are suitable for support of the proposed tanks. However, it may be prudent to scarify, moisture condition, and re -compact the subgrade soils below the tanks prior to bedding the tanks. 5.0 ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL As discussed previously, an Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) is proposed for the site. In order to evaluate the suitability of the subsurface materials for on-site sewage disposal, percolation testing was conducted at the site on January 7th 2009. Percolation testing was conducted in the sand soils in TP -3, TP -4, and TP -5. The percolation rates in the native sand soils ranged from 2.8 to 22.2 minutes -per - inch, with an average of approximately 12.0 minutes -per -inch. The percolation testing data are included in Appendix D. W:\2008 ALL PROJECTS \00815 - High Lonesome Ranch\00815-0002 High Lonesome Ranch II\200 - Geo\00815-0002 Lodge R012909.doc 6 Generally, percolation rates of between 5 and 60 minutes -per -inch are acceptable. Although the percolation rates in the soils were variable, on average, the native sand soils are anticipated to be acceptable for on-site sewage disposal. In addition to the percolation rate of the subsurface materials, the seasonal high groundwater elevation is an important factor in determining the suitability of the site for Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. For ISDS suitability, the seasonal high groundwater elevation should be at least four feet below the bottom of the proposed absorption bed. As discussed previously, groundwater was not encountered in the test pits or boring at the time of the investigation. In general, shallow groundwater is not anticipated to impact on-site sewage disposal at this site. With proper design, construction, and maintenance of Individual Sewage Disposal Systems, HBET believes that the effluent produced from the proposed structures at the site is not anticipated to adversely impact surrounding properties. 6.0 GENERAL The recommendations included above are based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and on our local experience. These conclusions and recommendations are valid only for the proposed construction. As discussed previously, the subsurface conditions at the site were slightly variable. However, the precise nature and extent of subsurface variability may not become evident until construction. Therefore, it is recommended that a representative of HBET be retained to provide engineering oversight and construction materials testing services during the foundation, pavement, and earthwork phases of the construction. This is to verify compliance with the recommendations included in this report or permit identification of significant variations in the subsurface conditions which may require modification of the recommendations. Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC is pleased to be of service to your project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this report. Respectfully Submitted: Huddlesto t ,;,ngineering and Testing, LLC Michael A. Berry, Vice President of Engineering W;\2008 ALL PROJECTS\00815 - High Lonesome Ranch \00815-0002 High Lonesome Ranch 10200 - Geo \00815-0002 Lodge R012909 doc 7 FIGURES APPENDIX A Typed Test Pit and Boring Logs Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC BORING NUMBER Lodge B-1 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 PAGE 1 OF 1 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 CLIENT High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME High Lonesome Ranch II PROJECT NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT LOCATION DeBeque CO DATE STARTED 2/19/09 COMPLETED 2/19/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR S. McKracken GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Simco 2000 Truck Rig AT TIME OF DRILLING dry LOGGED BY AS CHECKED BY MAB AT END OF DRILLING dry NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- Lo DEPTH (ft) GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (ROD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (tsf) DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ATTERBERG LIMITS FINES CONTENT (%) LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), tan, dry 9"U d"I F P:.'IVJ: s :© . ° { P; Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (SC), trace cobbles, tan, dry, medium dense SSL Lab Classified 10 $ S y X 1 83 7-12-15 (27) 22 11 46 9 31 19 12 74 % X ZS 78 10(31)16 20 Pla 999% �W / HMO �� AO Moo.. LEAN CLAY with Sand (CL), trace gravel, gray, dry, hard, SS2:dLab Classified .oO d;{O oa0.; Silty SAND with Gravel (sm), trace cobbles, gray to brown, dry, dense SS 3 83 15-18-22 (40) X SS 100 20-20 Bottom of hole at 26.0 feet. 8 0 0 CO5 0 0 W 0 Z 0 0 x 0 0 0 N 0 Z 7 0 0 U m CLIENT PROJECT Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME LOCATION BORING NUMBER Lodge TP -1 PAGE 1 OF 1 High Lonesome Ranch II NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT DeBeque CO DATE DRILLING DRILLING LOGGED NOTES STARTED BY 1/6/09 COMPLETED 1/6/09 GROUND ELEVATION WATER LEVELS: TIME OF DRILLING END OF DRILLING DRILLING HOLE SIZE CONTRACTOR Client GROUND dry METHOD Backhoe AT AS CHECKED BY MAB AT dry AFTER --- p DEPTH ° (ft) GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (ROD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (tsf) F z a� } 0 m MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ATTERBERG LIMITS FINES CONTENT (%) LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX --.0,...?-. vi. Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), tan, dry -3:... 6.::',:Silty ..;;.:::6 .o.:.. 3:.' .,. : .Q SAND with Gravel (SM) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (so), trace cobbles, tan, dry, medium dense to dense G61: Lab Classified MC 1 90 8 - 5.0 GB 6 35 27 8 36 ,e, 28 12 NP NP NP 7,5 or, Bottom of hole at 7.5 feet. 0 2 (9 ((0 0 0 (9 2 0 0 0 0 x CO x 0 /- 0 O W U' Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC BORING NUMBER Lodge TP -2 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 PAGE 1 OF 1 970-255-8005 970-255-6813 CLIENT High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME High Lonesome Ranch II PROJECT NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT LOCATION DeSeque, CO DATE STARTED 1/6/09 COMPLETED 1/6/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Client GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Backhoe AT TIME OF DRILLING dry LOGGED BY AS CHECKED BY MAB AT END OF DRILLING dry NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- GRAPHIC LOG SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (RQD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (tsf) DRY UNIT WT. (Pct) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ATTERBERG LIMITS FINES CONTENT (%) o DEPTH o (ft) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX = i/iO; Silty GRAVEL with Sand and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, moist to dry 9 o. Silty GRAVEL with Sand (GM), trace cobbles and boulders, tan, ( dry, medium dense to dense ) 1` ig MC 1 2.5 C GB1: Lab Classified 0 sot, V GB 1 7 NP NP NP 14 _o10 —0410 5.0 0"C 0 7 0 0t\0 c'-•0< 0 )c-0 0O ( 0 C D C C C 700 _VD - pc' - 7.5 010 )G 1 010 -)C 30 0 1.0 Dot 0C ala C C -010 )0—) 30 )0-0( 00 \01a0 /< c 0 C r Bottom of hole at 9.0 feet. 0 0 0 0 a. U W 0 W 0 0 8 9 m 8 N 2 2 D 2 O U m U w CLIENT PROJECT Huddleston-l3eny Engineering & Testing, LLC 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME LOCATION BORING NUMBER Lodge TP -3 PAGE 1 OF 1 High Lonesome Ranch II NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT DeBeque, CO DATE DRILLING DRILLING LOGGED NOTES STARTED CONTRACTOR METHOD BY 1/6/09 COMPLETED 1/6/09 GROUND ELEVATION WATER LEVELS: TIME OF DRILLING END OF DRILLING DRILLING HOLE SIZE Client GROUND dry Backhoe AT AS CHECKED BY MAB AT dry AFTER -- DEPTH ''. o (ft) '.. 0 E et n: J 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (RQD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (tsf) DRY UNIT WT. (pcf) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ATTERBERG LIMITS FINES CONTENT (%) LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX s:S cry. Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry 2.5 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, tan, dry, medium dense to dense 5.0 jav ;,y p;.: Q.. o. 3:;;'::> a''.' O.'' - Bottom of hole at 8.0 feet. GEOTECH BH COLUMNS 00815-0002 HIGH LONESOME RANCH H.GPJ GINT US LAB_GDT 2/26/09 CLIENT PROJECT Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing ,LLC 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME LOCATION BORING NUMBER Lodge TP -4 PAGE 1 OF 1 High Lonesome Ranch II NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT DeBeque, CO DATE DRILLING DRILLING LOGGED NOTES STARTED CONTRACTOR BY 1/6/09 COMPLETED 1/6/09 GROUND ELEVATION WATER LEVELS: TIME OF DRILLING END OF DRILLING DRILLING HOLE SIZE Client GROUND dry METHOD Backhoe AT AS CHECKED BY MAB AT dry AFTER --- o DEPTH o (h) GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (RQD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (150 DRY UNIT WT. (PCO MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ATTERBERG LIMITS FINES CONTENT (%) LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX ''4.. y' +;; Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry 2.5 °::Y.:.. " 0. 0,;0,;. Suty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, brown, dry, medium dense Bottom of hole at 3.0 feet. US LAB.GDT 2!26/09 GEOTECH 811 COLUMNS 00815-0002 HIGH LONESOME RANCH II.GPJ GI CLIENT PROJECT Huddleston-Berry Engineering &Testing ,LLC 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME LOCATION BORING NUMBER Lodge TP-5 PAGE 1 OF 1 High Lonesome Ranch 0 NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT DeBeque, CO DATE DRILLING DRILLING LOGGED NOTES STARTED CONTRACTOR BY 1/6/09 COMPLETED 1/6/09 GROUND ELEVATION WATER LEVELS: TIME OF DRILLING END OF DRILLING DRILLING HOLE SIZE Client GROUND dry METHOD Backhoe AT AS CHECKED BY MAB AT dry AFTER --- o DEPTH O (ft) 0 a. 0 ''' buy;. o i; i, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % (RQD) BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) POCKET PEN. (tsf) z a 0 (9 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ATTERBERG LIMITS FINES CONTENT (%) LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry - 2.5 S::w;: "��qqyy :. 6,4,: a.� Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, brown, dry, medium dense Bottom of hole at 3.0 feet. APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing Results 0 i 00815-0002 HIGH LONESOME RANCH II.GPJ GINT US LA8.G0T 2126109 0 CLIENT PROJECT Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC ATTE RBERG LIMITS' RESULTS 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand function, CO 81501 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 High Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME High Lonesome Ranch II NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT LOCATION DeBeque, CO 60 CL CH 50 P L A s 40 T I C T 30 N Alll 20 D 10 Ill■■ 44111 III ■■ r ML MH CL -ML 20 40 60 80 100 LIQUID LIMIT Specimen Identification LL PL PI #200 Classification • B-1, SS1 1/6/2009 33 22 11 46 CLAYEY SAND with GRAVEL(SC) 1 B-1, SS2 1/6/2009 31 19 12 74 LEAN CLAY with SAND(CL) s TP -1, GB1 1/6/2009 35 27 8 36 SILTY SAND with GRAVEL(SM) * TP -1, GB2 1/6/2009 NP NP NP O TP -2, GB1 1/6/2009 NP NP NP 14 SILTY GRAVEL with SAND(GM) 0 3 5 0_ C2 ii s z CC w 0 0 10w O z 0 0 0 S z 0 N 0 0 U . Eq 'S z CLIENT High Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC CONSOLIDATION TEST 640 White Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 970-255-8005 970-255-6818 Lonesome Ranch PROJECT NAME Hiqh Lonesome Ranch II PROJECT NUMBER 00815-0002 PROJECT LOCATION DeBeque CO 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 7 0 z 5.0 m 0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 80 100 1,000 10,000 STRESS, psf Specimen Identification Classification 7d MC% • Lodge TP -1 2.0 90 8 APPENDIX C Percolation Testing Data PERCOLATION TESTING Project Name: High Lonesome Ranch 11 Testing Conducted By: Pit Dimensions: Length Water Level Depth: A. Sigler SOIL PROFILE Depth Description Location: DeBeque, CO Supervising Engineer: Width Not Encountered X Project No. Test Pit No. Date: 1/7/2009 00815-0002 Lodge TP -3 M. Be ry ; Depth 8 ft Remarks 0-1.5 Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry 1.5-8 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, tan, dry, medium dense to dense Test Number: 1 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 16 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 2.1250 5 9.8750 7.7500 10 11.7500 1.8750 15 12.8750 1.1250 20 13.8750 1.0000 25 14.7500 0.8750 30 15.7500 1.0000 35 EMPTY 0.6250 40 9.6875 0.0625 45 10.0000 0.3125 50 10.3750 0.3750 55 10,5000 0.1250 60 10.7500 0.2500 Rate (min/in): J 5 Average Percolation Rate (min/in): Test Number: 2 Top of Hole Depth: 3 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.8750 5 4.5625 2.6875 10 5.8750 1.3125 15 6.6875 0.8125 20 7.6875 1.0000 25 8.3750 0.6875 30 9.0000 0.6250 35 9.6250 0.6250 40 9.6875 0.0625 45 10.0000 0.3125 50 10.3750 0.3750 55 10,5000 0.1250 60 10.7500 0.2500 Rate (min/in): 22.2 Test Number: 3 Top of Hole Depth: 6 ft Diameter of Hole: 5 in Depth of Hole: 15.5 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.1875 5 4.6875 3.5000 10 6.2500 1.5625 15 7.2500 1.0000 20 8.1250 0.8750 25 9.0000 0.8750 30 9.7500 0.7500 35 10.3750 0.6250 40 10.8750 0.5000 45 11.2500 0.3750 50 11.7500 0.5000 55 12.0625 0.3125 60 12.5000 0.4375 Rate (min/in): 11.8 PERCOLATION TESTING Project Name: High Lonesome Ranch 11 Testing Conducted By: Pit Dimensions: Length Water Level Depth: A. Sigler SOIL PROFILE Depth Description Location: DeBeque, CO Supervising Engineer: Width Not Encountered X Project No. Test Pit No. Date: 1/7/2009 00815-0002 Lodge TP -4 M.Bery ; Depth 3 ft Remarks 0-1.5 Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry 1.5-3 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, brown, dry, medium dense Test Number: 1 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.2500 5 4.3750 3.1250 10 5.7500 1.3750 15 6.6250 0.8750 20 7.6875 1.0625 25 8.5625 0.8750 30 9.2500 0.6875 35 10.0000 0.7500 40 10.4375 0.4375 45 10.8125 0.3750 50 11.1875 0.3750 55 11.5000 0.3125 60 12.0000 0.5000 Rate (min/in): 12.5 Average Percolation Rate (min/in): Test Number 2 Top of Hole Depth: 3 ft Diameter of Hole: 6 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 1.5000 5 3.8125 2.3125 10 5.0625 1.2500 15 5.8750 0.8125 20 6.7500 0.8750 25 7.7500 1.0000 30 8.0000 0.2500 35 8.1875 0.1875 40 8.6875 0.5000 45 9.1250 0.4375 50 9.5000 0.3750 55 9.6250 0.1250 60 10.0625 0.4375 Rate (min/in): 15.1 Test Number: Top of Hole Depth: Diameter of Hole: Depth of Hole: Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) Rate (min/in) PERCOLATION TESTING Project Name: High Lonesome Ranch II Testing Conducted By: A. Sigler Location: DeBeque, CO Pit Dimensions: Length Water Level Depth: SOIL PROFILE Depth Description Supervising Engineer ; Width Project No. Test Pit No. Date: 1/7/2009 00815-0002 odge TP -5 M. Be ry Not Encountered X ; Depth 3 ft Remarks 0-1.5 Silty SAND with Gravel and Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, dry Change (in.) 1.5-3 Silty SAND with Gravel (sm) to Clayey SAND with Gravel (sc), trace cobbles, brown, dry, medium dense 5 9.1250 6.6250 10 12.2500 3.1250 15 14.3750 2.1250 Test Number 1 Top of Hole Depth: 0 ft Diameter of Hole: 5.5 in Depth of Hole: 16 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 2.5000 5 9.1250 6.6250 10 12.2500 3.1250 15 14.3750 2.1250 20 15.8750 1.5000 25 EMPTY 0.0625 30 10.2500 0.4375 35 10.5625 0.3125 40 11.0000 0.4375 45 11.3750 0.3750 50 11.6250 0.2500 55 12.0000 0.3750 Rate (min/in): 2.8 Average Percolation Rate (min/in): Test Number: 2 Top of Hole Depth: 3 ft Diameter of Hole: 6 in Depth of Hole: 14 in Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) 0 3.5000 5 6.6250 3.1250 10 7.7500 1.1250 15 8.6250 0.8750 20 9.7500 1.1250 25 9.8125 0.0625 30 10.2500 0.4375 35 10.5625 0.3125 40 11.0000 0.4375 45 11.3750 0.3750 50 11.6250 0.2500 55 12.0000 0.3750 Rate (min/in):13.7 Test Number: Top of Hole Depth: Diameter of Hole: Depth of Hole: Time (min.) Water Depth (in.) Change (in.) MISS__ MENEM INMEMNIM SMI _MISS_ MIN SSS Rate (min/in) HINO ENGINEE ING, INC. 11.1/.{t AGE IZH)ORT thr CRERK:P.A.V THE HIGH tiotcrEsomf: Rev,;(1:11, COIIN TY (.:(111...ORADO "DO: cip,.:REDF:11,11) IBIJIL,IDLIA`43 INE:IPAIR:11MIHYNI I (1,71.1)11,(1)R,ft!,11)(11) 81,(,()1 PREP.A.R.i3J) FOR: 'The f.A.N,;:e.soute Debccit.ft:, (70 S16:30 1:1,110,;0 1229 1:,•:;ort.1.1 23"' Suilr Giurni , 1 09 2@f:171,112 1229 North 23rd Street, Suite 201 Grand Junction, CO 81501 (970)241-6027 DRAINAGE REPORT for KIMBALL CREEK PAVILION AT THE HIGH LONESOME RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO SUBMITTED TO: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT 108 8TH STREET GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 PREPARED FOR: The High Lonesome Ranch PO Box 88 Debeque, CO 81630 PREPARED BY: Rhino Engineering, Inc. 1229 North 23r11 Street, Suite 201 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 May 1, 2009 RE Project No. 28071.02 "I hereby certify that this Drainage Report for Kimball Creek Pavilion at the High Lonesome Ranch, located in Section 9, Township 7S, Range 100W of the 6th Principal Meridian in Garfield County, Colorado, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Stormwater Management Manual for the owners thereof. I understand that Garfield County does not and will not assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others." John Emil Kornfeld, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. 33064 iRe rt Prepared By: Je ie E. DeFrank, E I n��� 1-4: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 1 A. Background 1 B. Property Location 1 C. Description of Property 2 D. Previous Investigations 2 2.0 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 2 A. Existing Drainage Conditions 2 B. Offsite Tributary Area 3 C. Proposed Drainage System Description 3 3.0 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA 4 A. Regulations 4 B. Development Criteria 4 C. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Criteria 4 4.0 REFERENCES 4 Appendix A Appendix B Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 NRCS Soils Map Drainage Calculations APPENDICES EXHIBITS Existing Drainage Map (24" x 36" In Map Pocket) Drainage Basin Map (USGS Quadrangle Map) Post -Development Drainage Plan (24" x 36" In Map Pocket) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Background This drainage report for Kimball Creek Pavilion at The High Lonesome Ranch was prepared by Rhino Engineering, Inc. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the impact (or change) to the existing drainages, in relation to the historic drainage pattern and peak runoff, due to the proposed improvements. B. Property Location The site is located south of Garfield County Road 202 (northwest of Debeque) on land owned by The High Lonesome Ranch. The site will be accessed by a gravel road from Garfield County Road 202. Garfield County Road 202 is accessed from Roan Creek Road, north of Debeque. By 1eal description, the site is located in the NE'/ of Section 9, Township 7S, Range 100W of the 6 Principal Meridian in Garfiled County. Refer to Figure 1 — General Location Map. Approximate Location of Site • Figure 1 — General Location Map 1 C. Description of Property The site is presently undeveloped. Proposed improvements will include a lodge, bath house, and tent area. Current vegetation is high desert shrub and sagebrush with fair to good ground cover. Average slope is about 10% to the southeast. Kimball Creek is situated about 400 feet south of the proposed lodge. According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), the soils in this area consist of Happle Very Channery Sandy Loam Complex. This soil complex is considered well drained and is classified as a hydrologic group 'B' soil. Refer to Appendix A for soil map and further information. D. Previous Investigations The project site is not included in any known master drainage plan nor is it located in a FEMA designated floodplain according to FEMA FIRM Panel No. 0802051225B for unincorporated Garfield County. 2.0 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION A. Existing Drainage Conditions The topography across the site is fairly steep with slopes of about 10%. Disturbance footprint area is about 13.0 acres. Runoff sheet flows in a south/southeasterly direction across the site. There are no structures on the site. An existing irrigation ditch with headgate is situated parallel to the north bank of Kimball Creek. There is also an existing 10 -foot wide gravel road connected to County Road 202 and another dirt road parallel to Kimball Creek which provides access to a natural gas well. Refer to Exhibit 1 — Existing Drainage Map. The Rational Method was used to estimate existing runoff rates and volumes. Runoff coefficients for the 25 -year and 100 -year storms based on group `B' soils with 0% imperviousness are 0.25 and 0.35. These coefficients are referenced from Volume 1 of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. The time of concentration for the existing site is: t; =1.8(1.1—K) L05 0 Sr 0.33 = 1.8 0.1— 0.08)@00" t L L 840 ft = 380s = 6.3 min V CVSos 7 x 0.10°3 t, =14.9 + 6.3 = 21.2 min 2 00.33 )=14 9 min EXISTING DRAINAGE (RATIONAL METHOD) STORM PEAK RUNOFF (CFS) RUNOFF VOLUME (CF) 25 -YEAR 8.2 13,800 100 -YEAR 14.3 24,000 B. Offsite Tributary Area The proposed improvements are located in the Kimball Creek watershed. The site is situated on an alluvial fan and is affected by offsite drainage from the north that flows to Kimball Creek. Offsite tributary area is about 56 acres. Refer to Exhibit 2 — USGS Major Basin Map. Runoff from this offsite drainage was estimated using the SCS Curve Number Method since the basin area is larger than 20 acres. A curve number of 72 was used based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service's (NRCS) TR -55 program for a land use defined as "arid and semi -arid rangelands with desert shrub in fair condition on hydrologic group 'B' soils". According to NRCS TR -55, the time of concentration for the offsite basin is about 12 minutes. This relatively short time compared with the basin size is due to the steep topography of the offsite area as can be seen in Exhibit 2. OFFSITE DRAINAGE (SCS METHOD) STORM PEAK RUNOFF (CFS) RUNOFF VOLUME (AF) 25 -YEAR 20 1.7 100 -YEAR 44 3.1 C. Proposed Drainage System Description The construction of the lodge and bathhouse will add approximately 6,800 square feet of impervious area. Additionally, the gravel roads and parking area will cover 27,000 square feet. The overall developed site imperviousness assuming a 40% impervious value for gravel area is: I = 0.16Ac + (0.40 x 0.62Ac) 3% 13Ac Weighted coefficients based on 3% imperviousness are 0.27 and 0.37. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE (RATIONAL METHOD) STORM PEAK RUNOFF (CFS) RUNOFF VOLUME (CF) 25 -YEAR 8.9 14,900 100 -YEAR 15.1 25,400 3 Since the addition of impervious area on the site is small compared with the overall area, and the site is situated next to Kimball Creek, detention is not being proposed with the development. Instead, runoff will sheet flow as it has historically done, into the creek. There will be no concentrated points of flow leaving the site. Due to the fact that the area is situated at the base of Kimball Creek and is subject to a significant amount of offsite flow, finished floor elevations on all permanent structures should be a minimum of two feet above adjacent grade. This should provide adequate protection from shallow sheet flow flooding. The bath house, which is the closest permanent structure to Kimball Creek, will be elevated approximately 24 -feet above the bank of the creek which should provide it sufficient protection from any major flooding. 3.0 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA A. Regulations The drainage criteria used in this report meets guidelines specified in the Garfield County's New Land Use Regulations (effective 1-1-09) for Article VII Standards, Section 7-206 Drainage. 8. Development Criteria There are no drainage constraints placed on the project by major drainage or floodplain studies or adjacent developments. C. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Criteria The 25 and 100 year storms were considered the minor and major storms. Rational method coefficients used to estimate runoff on the site were taken from guidelines from Volume 1 of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. The SCS curve number used to estimated offsite runoff is based on criteria in the NRCS TR -55 guidelines. 4.0 REFERENCES The following manuals, computer programs, and engineering reports were used as references in the preparation of this report. • Garfield County New Land Use Regulations (effective 1-1-09) for Article VII Standards, Section 7-206 Drainage. • Volume 1 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. 2001 • NRCS Technical Release No 55 (TR -55). Version 1.00.08. 2004 4 Magnetic Declination Name: THE SADDLE Date: 5/6/2009 Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Location: 039° 28' 20.67" N 108° 25' 54.51" W NAD 27 Caption: EXHIBIT 2 - MAJOR BASIN MAP Copyright (0)1997, Maptech, Inc. APPENDIX A NRCS SOILS DATA 39° 28 3" 39° 27' 51" Hydrologic Soil Group—Douglas-Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 720000 720040 720200 720240' , 3 97 9"28'3" • N A 720000 720040 720080 720120 720160 720200 720240' Map Scale: 1:1,750 ifprinted on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet Meters O 15 30 60 90 Feet O 50 100 200 300 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.2 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/4/2009 Page 1 of 3 39° 27' 51" Hydrologic Soil Group—Douglas-Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties MAP INFORMATION MAP LEGEND co cc 0 \\\ n !fo {}{ ce k\\ 0 = 0. k\ƒ\ Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 0. f<20 000 \g1El El El to Not rated or not av ce ! ,) • Streams and Canals 28 S) 0 co to to to ca ,\ csih CO \ Hydrologic Soil Group -Douglas -Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group—Summary by Map Unit—Douglas-Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Map unit symbol <. Map unit name Rating Acres in A01 Percent of AOI 44 Happle very channery sandy loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes B 15.0 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 15.0 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, 8, C, and D) and three dual classes (ND, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.2 5/4/2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated)—Douglas-Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. The Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) report displays a generated description of the major soils that occur in a map unit. Descriptions of non -soil (miscellaneous areas) and minor map unit components are not included. This description is generated from the underlying soil attribute data. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other Soil Data Mart reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report—Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Douglas -Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Map Unit: 44—Happle very channery sandy loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes Component: Happle (80%) The Happle component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 3 to 12 percent. This component is on alluvial fans. The parent material consists of green river formation alluvium derived from shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. This component is in the R034XY298C0 Rolling Loam ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 8 percent. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.2 5/4/2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated)—Douglas-Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Douglas -Plateau Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Survey Area Data: Version 5, Feb 1, 2008 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.2 5/4/2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX B DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FDR -APPENDIX C Duration ***** HYDRO ***** (Version 6.0) ***** Date 05-04-** Page No 2 Kimball Creek ColoradoDD 0 0 ❑ 0 0000 IDE Curve for Various Return Periods 10 Yr 2 Yr Intensities (in/h) 5 Yr 25 Yr 50 Yr 100 Yr 5 min 4.233 3.044 3.782 4.814 5.235 5.636 10 min 3.232 2.228 2.846 3.740 4.115 4.475 15 min 2.537 1.660 2.195 2.994 3.336 3.668 30 min 1.683 1.043 1.429 2.029 2.292 2.551 60 min 1.034 .615 .866 1.266 1.445 1.622 120 min .667 .397 .558 .816 .932 1.047 4 h .389 .232 .326 .477 .544 .611 8 h .213 .126 .178 .260 .297 .334 16 h .111 .066 .093 .136 .156 .175 24 h .075 .045 .063 .092 .105 .118 4.23* 3.17* 2.12. KIMBALL CREEK COLORADO 0 0000 0 Intensity Curve for 10 Year Return Period Rainfall Intensity (in/h) versus Duration (h) 1.06. * .00 * .00 6.00 12.00 18.00 24.00 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 Ex Site (25yr) Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Intensity IDF Curve = Rational = 25 yrs = 13.000 ac = 2.524 in/hr = Rifle IDF 25&100only.IDF Monday, May 4 2009, 2:53 PM Peak discharge Time interval Runoff coeff. Tc by User Asc/Rec limb fact = 8.20 cfs = 1 min = 0.25 = 21.00 min = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 Hydrograph Volume = 13,796 tuft Ex Site (25yr) Hyd. No. 1 -- 25 Yr 10 — Hyd No. 1 20 30 40 50 60 Q (cfs) 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 Ex Site (100yr) Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Intensity IDF Curve = Rational = 100 yrs = 13.000 ac = 3.135 in/hr = Rifle IDF 25&100only.IDF Monday, May 4 2009, 2:54 PM Peak discharge Time interval Runoff coeff. Tc by User Asc/Rec limb fact = 14.26 cfs = 1 min = 0.35 = 21.00 min = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 15.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 Hydrograph Volume = 23,992 tuft Ex Site (100yr) Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Yr 0 10 — — Hyd No. 2 20 30 40 50 Q (cfs) 15.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 60 Time (min) Jennie D. Pavillion 0 High Lonesome Garfield County, Colorado Sub -Area Time of Concentration Details Sub -Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) Offsite SHEET SHALLOW SHALLOW 100 2100 1800 0.7000 0.5500 0.1200 0.130 1.08 1.08 0.060 0.049 0.089 Time of Concentration .198 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.08 Page 1 5/4/2009 3:24:21 PM Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 Offsite Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 25 yrs = 56.000 ac = 0.0 % = USER = 2.21 in = 24 hrs Monday, May 4 2009, 3:30 PM Peak discharge = 20.39 cfs Time interval = 5 min Curve number = 72 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.00 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 21.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 Hydrograph Volume = 73,404 cuft Offsite Hyd. No. 4 -- 25 Yr 3 5 8 10 13 15 18 20 -- Hyd No. 4 Q (cfs) 21.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 23 25 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 Offsite Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 56.000 ac = 0.0 % = USER = 2.83 in = 24 hrs Monday, May 4 2009, 3:31 PM Peak discharge = 44.31 cfs Time interval = 5 min Curve number = 72 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.00 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 Hydrograph Volume = 135,097 cuft Offsite Hyd. No. 4 --100 Yr 0 3 5 8 10 13 15 18 20 — Hyd No. 4 Q (cfs) 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 • 0.00 23 25 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 6 Developed Site (25yr) Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Intensity IDF Curve = Rational = 25 yrs = 13.000 ac = 2.524 in/hr = Rifle IDF 25&100onIy.IDF Monday, May 4 2009, 2:56 PM Peak discharge Time interval Runoff coeff. Tc by User Asc/Rec limb fact = 8.86 cfs = 1 min = 0.27 = 21.00 min = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 Hydrograph Volume = 14,899 ouft Developed Site (25yr) Hyd. No. 6 -- 25 Yr 0 10 --- Hyd No. 6 20 30 40 50 Q (cfs) 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 60 Time (min) Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 7 Developed Site (100yr) Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Intensity IDF Curve = Rational = 100 yrs = 13.000 ac = 3.135 in/hr = Rifle IDF 25&100only.IDF Monday, May 4 2009, 3:0 PM Peak discharge Time interval Runoff coeff. Tc by User Asc/Rec limb fact = 15.08 cfs = 1 min = 0.37 = 21.00 min = 1/1.67 Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 Hydrograph Volume = 25,363 cuft Developed Site (100yr) Hyd. No. 7 -- 100 Yr 0 10 — Hyd No. 7 20 30 40 50 Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00 0.00 60 Time (min) N N \ `. APP1 OX. DI TCH LOCA�ON 1 \ riM TOP OF RFS\ EL 6272.97' LAT.= 8927' 54.02084N LONG.= W8'26'32.66392W 17 1 APPROX. DITCH LOCATION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\ 1 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ 1\\\\\ 1 1 1 1 \ \1 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �, \ \ \ \ ��, , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ID \ \ �D \, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , ` \ \ \ \ \6, \ \ \ \ \I \ \I �° ` \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ % . \ \ \ \ \ \ \/ \ . \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6'D \ \ \ \ \\49 \ \ ° \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ �- ` , \ \ \ KIMBALL CREEK NORTHERLY TOP OF BANK \ \. .� ±101 DIRT ROAD TO BE ABANDONED APPROX. DITCH LOCATION IRRIGATION POND 625 \ \\ \ \ \I 60 \ N N N 1 N N 1 1 N MEN i— i i— i i i ■r�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING ±101 WIDE GRAVEL ROAD TO BE IMPROVED AND WIDENED TO 18' FROM CR 202 TO PARKING TURNOFF (8" MIN. GRAVEL THICKNESS). SHEET FLOW AND SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW FROM DRAINAGE AREA OFFSITE BASI N OFFSITE SITE 1/4 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA Q(25) Q(100) 56 20 44 13 6.2 14.3 LEGEND -al 6270 - MAGNL7IC EXISTING DITCH DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY DIRECTION OF RUNOFF CONTOURS 2' EXISTING DRAINAGE & SLOPE GRAPHIC SCALE 50' ❑ 25 50 100 200' IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. 0 co DESCRIPTION w H 0 z 0 0 0 z Q 0 0 z X L] X uJ 0 z Q 0 Er 0 KIIV3ALL CHEEK 0 Li] 0 0 0 CN 0 EL 0 0 0 ry i o� w 0 I� U 0 QJ w L Q 0 41 ;77 cip CZ 0 q (C3\3 fax 970.256.7992 970.241.6027 =p9 RE9!s`" teF I 3'3064 3 �0..99�z. 5-7-09/4 /4_4; sioNA\- REVIEWED BY JEK PREPARED BY JED DATE 5/1/2009 1 ilormakrrodorse SCALE = 50' PROJECT NO 28071.02 SHEET NO 1 A OX, DITCHN, LOION TEM TOP OF P2BAR\ EL= 627Z.97' LAT = 39'27'54.02084N WM.= 108'26'32.55392Y �....�I 11 1 APPROX. DITCH LOCATION -.....,....4 mn Emi non mu \ , \ \ 1 1 1 \��N � 1 \ II \ I \ 1 � N N I I I \ I \ 1 1 \I l 1 I 1 KIMBALL CREEK NORTHERLY TOP OF BANK 11 HOT TUB AREA 1 F HOUSE = FF = 6274.0' 1 1 � � 1 1 PARKING SPACES (10) 10'X20'TV. 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 PAVILION FF = 6286.75' '1 DECK FF = 6286.00' 1 \ 8' WIDE ACCESS 1 1 FIRE PIT I\ \ \FLAT AREA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \, \ \ \ \ s� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,��, \ \ °o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ N \ \ \ \ \� 1 \ \ \ \ \N. \°�9 \ �\ \ \ , \ \ \ / \ �. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / l \ , \ \/ 1� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \, I 1 \ \ \ \\ N \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a \ \ N N \ \ >r N N \ \ `NNN ` \ --__ \ ` \ \ \ \\ \ \_ --, .. \ _ _ `` \ - ±10' []IRT ROAD S6D ` ` \ \ \ TO BE ABANDONED \ • \ -- _ \ \ \ \r \ --- \ ` \i � N. \ \ APPROX. DITCH LOCATION \ IRRIGATION POND _ __ 0250 N N LO I • ME — — — MI �■ — — — .I• EXISTING ±10' WIDE GRAVEL ROAD TO BE IMPROVED AND WIDENED TO 18' FROM CR 202 TO PARKING TURNOFF (8" MIN_ GRAVEL THICKNESS). SHEET FLOW AND SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW FROM OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAINTENANCE BUILDING 12' X 20' FF = 6308.5' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NM .. = r — BIN .. — 50' DEVELOPED DRAINAGE BASIN AREA Q(25) Q(100) OFFSITE 56 20 44 SITE 13 8.9 15.1 LEGEND 6270 MACN 7JC EXISTING DITCH — DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY DIRECTION OF RUNOFF CONTOURS 2' EXISTING DRAINAGE & SLOPE GRAPHIC SCALE ❑ 25' 50' 100' 200' ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. U DESCRIPTION LiJ 1- 0 z 0 05 CD W Z < \ J OJ QQ o f0 O Nr)fl cn L,J z� EZLLJ OZ LLJ xrr 0 w0J0U J 0 LJ =J m LII 0—=L� 1— (n C7 0 a_ fax 974.256.7992 976.247.6927 REVIEWED BY JEK PREPARED BY JED DATE 5/1 /2009 SCALE 1" = 50' PROJECT NO 28071.02 SHEET NO 2