HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 01.16.2006Exhibits for High Lonesome Lodge Public Hearing held on January 16, 2006.
Exhibit
Letter (A to
Z)'.
Exhibit
A
Mail Return -Receipts
B
Proof of Publication
C
Garfield County Zoning Regulations of 1978, as amended.
D
Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000
E
Project Information and Staff Comments
F
Memo from Jake Mall, Road & Bridge Department, dated 12/27/05
G
Email from Jim Sears, Sheriff's Department, dated 1/3/06
H
Letter Dated 1-11-06 from Archie Uruquhart
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
X
Y
Z
AA
13B
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HII
II
JJ
KK
LL
MM
NN
00
BOCC 01/16/06
MB
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REQUEST: Special Use Permit request for a "Resort"
APPLICANT (OWNER): #10 Enterprises, LLC aka High Lonesome Lodge
REPRESENTATIVE: Richard H. Krohn
LOCATION: Northwest of DeBeque, CO
SUBJECT SITE DATA: Approximately 30 to 50 acres of a 13,000 acre ranch
ACCESS: County Road 200 (North Dry Fork Road)
EXISTING ZONING: Resource Lands (R/L): Gentle Slopes and Lower
Valley Floor
SURROUNDING ZONING: R/L and Public Lands (BLM)
L DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a special use permit for a resort on the property known as the
High Lonesome Lodge. Previously, the Board approved an outdoor shooting range on approximately
1.5 acres of the ranch. The proposed resort would include six (6) cabins to house up to 35 guests for
hunting and fishing activities on the property and adjoining public lands.
Location of the Ranch / Proposed Range Site
The subject property, known as High Lonesome Lodge consists of approximately 13,000 acres and is
located northwest of DeBeque, Colorado on North Dry Fork Road and surrounded primarily by BLM
land in the far western portion of the county along the North Dry Fork Creek drainage. The proposed
resort activities would occur on approximately 30 to 50 acres of the ranch accessed by County Road
200 (North Dry Fork Road) which winds through portions of the ranch and BLM to dead-end in the
ranch.
Elements of the Proposed Resort
The proposed resort activities will utilize six (6) cabins located on the property that will
accommodate between 4 and 13 guests, with a total of 35 guest beds available. In addition to the
cabins, there is a residence for the ranch manager, a guide's cabin and a cookhouse. The resort will
offer hunting and fishing activities to guests that will occur on the ranch and the adjoining public
lands. Guests will also be allowed to use the previously approved shooting range for practice or
warm up to a hunting activity. The cookhouse will provide meals to the guests and ranch
employees.
Domestic water is provided three springs on the property adjudicated in Augmentation Plan in Case
No. 02CW195 in Water Division No. 5. All buildings have existing individual sewage disposal
systems in place. Access to the site is via County Road 200, which follows along the valley floor
through a portion of the property and dead ends on the property.
II. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The property is located in Study Area 5. This study area does not specifically provide for land use
designations as in Study Areas 1, 2, and 3 as much of this area is public lands. The Recreation / Open
Space element of the Comprehensive Plan does provide policy guidance to the proposal as stated the
following goal of Section 5.0:
"Garfield County should provide adequate opportunities for County residents, ensure access to
public lands consistent with BLM / USFS policies, and preserve existing recreational
opportunities and important visual corridors."
Staff finds the proposal provides a recreational opportunity for County residents as well as attracting
new and returning visitors to the County, does not conflict with the policies of the neighboring BLM
regarding access to public lands, and is not located in nor interferes with any designated visual
corridors.
III.APPLICABLE REGULATIONS IN THE ZONING RESOLUTION
A Resort is a special use in the R/L zone district which may be granted if the Board fmds the request
meets the following applicable definitions, criteria, and standards provided in the regulations.
A. Definition of a Resort
The Zoning Resolution defines a Resort as a "Dude ranch or guest ranch; hunting or
fishing camp, cross-country or trail skiing lodge (any of which shall not exceed twelve
(12) dwelling units or forty-eight (48) beds or visitor capacity), land used for the purpose
of recreation, which provides lodging, recreational activities, dining facilities,
commissary and other needs operated on the site for guests or members."
Staff Finding
The proposed resort will serve a maximum of 35 guests and is to provide hunting and fishing
activities for the guests. As proposed, the application meets the criteria for a resort.
B. Review Criteria and Requirements for a Resort
An application for a Resort must address the following standards and criteria in order to be
approved by the Board. The requirements / standards are listed below in bold italics followed
by a Staff response:
General Special Use Permit Requirements (Section 5.03)
I) Utilities adequate to provide water and sanitation service based on accepted
2
engineering standards and approved by the Board of County Commissioners shall
either be in place or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use.
Staff Finding
The applicant has provided a copy of Water Division No. 5 decree of Augmentation Case
No. 02C W 195, which provides augmentation for three springs on the property and water
storage rights for a number of ponds and reservoirs on the property. The agumentation
plan provides 0.75 cfs absolute for domestic and commercial purposes and 1.32 cfs
conditional for domestic and commercial purposes. The applicants are allowed to use
the water for domestic, commercial, recreational, pisccatoral and wildlife purposes.
Each of the proposed buildings on the property are existing and have approved ISD
systems.
Staff Finding
The water rights associated with the property are more than adequate to meet the legal
and physical needs of the proposed resort. The ISD systems meet the State and County
requirements for ISDS.
2) Street improvements adequate to accommodate traffic volume generated by the
proposed use and to provide safe, convenient access to the use shall either be in place
or shall be constructed in conjunction with the proposed use;
Staff Finding
As noted previously the property is accessed by County Road 200 (North Dry Fork
Road). The applicantion states that the number of vehicles accessing the site on a daily
basis for the resort activities will vary 4 to 8 vehicles. In addition to the resort activities,
there will be agricultural vehicles accessing the site associated with the agricultural
activities on the property. The same employees will work on the ranch and provide
services to the guests of the resort..
The county road dead -ends into a private road which serves the ranch. At the fork, where
CR 200 departs CR 222, the only property it serves is the High Lonesome Lodge. There
is very little traffic on this road. The traffic counts collected during the summer of 2002
indicated there were a total of 49 average daily trips. The County Road and Bridge
Department previously noted that the road surface consists of oil -shale and is in fair
condition and should not present any issue with respect to the proposed resort. Road &
Bridge saw no problems with the application, provided they comply with the following
conditions of approval:
1. A stop sign shall be placed at any and all entrances to Garfield County Roads that
are being used for commercial purposes.
2. All signs and installations shall be as required by the MUTCD, (Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices).
3. All accesses should have access permits on file with Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department or access permits should be issued to meet Road and Bridge
standards
3
4. No extra maintenance or snow plowing will be provided for other than what is
normally provided at this time as a result of the approval of this SUP.
3) Design of the proposed use is organized to minimize impact on and from adjacent uses
of land through installation of screen fences or landscape materials on the periphery
of the lot and by location of intensively utilized areas, access points, lighting and signs
in such a manner as to protect established neighborhood character;
Staff Finding
The proposed resort is located on property that is bordered by BLM to the north and east
and along County Road 200 to the south and west and is approximately 13,000 acres in
size. Given that the property is very large in size and is surrounded by public lands and
the County road dead ends on the property, there is no screening or landscaping
necessary to minimize the impact on adjacent properties.
Regarding lighting, the applicant intends to serve the site with electricity. Any lighting
shall be required to be directed downward and inward. This has been made a condition of
approval.
IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board
of County Commissioners.
2. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and
complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all
interested parties at the hearing were heard at that meeting.
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed special use permit is in the
best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare
of the citizens of Garfield County.
4. That the application is in conformance with the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
of 1978, as amended.
V. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners Approve the special use permit request for a
Resort on the property known as the High Lonesome Lodge with the following conditions:
1) The maximum number of guests staying at the resort shall be 35. Any occupancy greater than
35 shall require a new land use permit..
2) Any lighting installed at the resort shall be directed downward and inward.
3) A stop sign shall be placed at any and all entrances to Garfield County Roads that are
being used for commercial purposes.
4) All signs and installations shall be as required by the MUTCD, (Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices).
5) All accesses will have access permits on file with Garfield County Road & Bridge
Department or access permits should be issued to meet Road and Bridge standards
6) No extra maintenance or snow plowing will be provided for other than what is normally
provided at this time as a result of the approval of this SUP.
VL RECOMMENDED MOTION (always stated in the affirmative)
"I move to approve the Special Use Permit request for a "Resort for up to 35 Guests" for the High
Lonesome Lodge owned by #10 Enterprises, LLC on County Road 200, DeBeque, CO with
conditions."
5
Z
ex/P/8/r4
Legal Description:
Tract 40: in Sections 30 and 31 and in Sections 25 and 36, Township 5 South, Range 101 West, 6th P.M.,
according to the resurvey thereof, (The foregoing property formerly has been described as follows:
SE1/4NW1/4; E1/2 SW1/4 and Lot 4 in Section 30; E1/2NW1/4, W1/2NE1/4, NE1/4NEI/4, NW1/4SEI/4,
EI/2SWl/4, and Lots 3 and 4, Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 100 West, 6h P.M.; and Lot 2 in
Section 4 and Lot 1 in Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 101 West, 6'h P.M.
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 100 WEST, 6th P.M.
Section 31: SEI/4, SE1/4NW 1/4 and E1/2SW 1/4
TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 101 WEST, 6`h P.M.
Section 2: Lot 3 and NW 1/4SW 1/4
Section 3: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, N1/2SW 1/4, SE1/4SW1/4 and SE t/4
Section I I: SW1/4SE1/4 and SW 1/4
Section 14: N1/2
Section 15: E1/2NE1/4
Section 23: SEI/4NEI/4 and E1/2SE1/4
Section 24: NE1/4, NE1/4NW1/4, W1/2 /4 and W1/2SW1/4
Section 25: W 1/2NW 1 /4
Section 26: E1/2NE1/4
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, CH P.M.
Section 16: SW 1/4SW 1/4
Section 17: SE1/4SEI/4
Section 18: SWI/4SEI/4, NE1/4SE1/4
Section 19: Lot 9, NI/2NE1/4
Section 20: N1/2N1/2
Section 28: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 7
Section 29: Lot 2, SE1/4NW 1/4, 51/2NE1/4, N1/2SEI/4, SW 1/4SW 1/4, E1/2SW 1/4
Section 30: Lots 10, 11 and 13; SE1/4SEI/4
Section 32: NEI/4NW1/4
Section 35: NEI/4SEI/4 and Lots 2 and 5
Section 36: Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10
Tract 50: Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1/2SW 1/4 of Section 26,
the NEL/4SE1/4 and SEI/4NEI/4 of Section 27
Tract 51: Being the same land described under the original survey as the S1/2SW 1/4 of Section 26,
SEI/4SE1/4 of Section 27 and the NEI/4NW I/4 of Section 35
Tract 52: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4,
E1/2NW 1/4, and the NW 1/4NW 1/4 of Section 27
Tract 54: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW 1/4SEI/4 of Section
27, the E1/2 of Section 34, and the NWI/4NW1/4, S1/2NW1/4, and the SW1/4 of
Section 35 (less three (3) acres in Section 35)
Tract 55: Being the same land described under the original survey as the NI/2N1/2 of Section 28
Tract 56: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NEI/4,
SE1/4NW1/4 and the N 1/2SW 1/4 of Section 28
Tract 59: Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1/2NE1/4 and the
SE1/4NEI/4 of Section 35, and the SW 1/4NW 1/4 of Section 36
Tract 60: Being the same land described under the original survey as the W1/2SE1/4 and the
N1/2SW1/4 of Section 36
Tract 61: Being the same land described under the original survey as the Lot 4 in Section 31,
Township 7 South, Range 98 West; and the SEI/4SE1/4 of Section 36, Township 7
South, Range 99 West
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 100 WEST, 6TH P.M.
Section 15: N1/2SE1/4, NEI/4SW 1/4, and Lots 1, 2 and 4
Section 16: Lot 2
Section 18: SE1/4NE1/4
Tracts 48G and 48H
Tract 39: Being the same land described under the original survey as the S1/2NEI/4, SEI/4NW1/4
of Section 25
Tract 40: Being the same land described under the original survey as the E1/2SW1/4, and
W 1/2SE1/4 of Section 25
Tract42: Being the same land described under the original survey as the S1/2SW1/4 and
SW 1/4SEI/4 of Section 23, and NWI/4NE1/4 of Section 26
Tract 43: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NW1/4 and
NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 25, and SE1/4NE1/4 and NE1/4SE1/4 of Section 26
Tract 44: Being the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4NE1/4 of Section
26
Tract45: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4,
NW 1/4SE1/4 and NE1/4SW1/4 of Section26
Tract 57: Being the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4SE1/4 of Section
25, Township 7 South, Range 100 West; and Lot 3, the NE1/4SW1/4 and the
NW 1/4SEI/4 of Section 30, Township 7 South, Range 99 West
Tract 58: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SE1/4SE1/4 of Section
25, Township 7 South, Range 100 West; Lot 4 of Section 30 and Lot 1 of Section 31 in
Township 7 South, Range 99 West, and NEI/4NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 7 South,
Range 100 West
TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH RANGE 98 WEST, 6TH P.M.
Section 6:
Section 7:
Section 8:
Section 9:
Section 10:
Section 11:
NW1/4SEI/4, NE1/4SW1/4, SE1/4NW1/4, SW1/4NE1/4, S1/2SE1/4, and Lot 4, being
the same land described under the original survey as the NW 1/4NW 1/4 of said Section 6
N1/2NE1/4, EXCEPT a one acre tract as described in deed recorded in Book 181 at Page
317, records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder
NW1/4NE1/4, N1/2NW 1/4, SW1/4NWI/4
W1/2NE1/4, SE1/4NE1/4
SW 1/4NW 1/4, NEI/4SW 1/4, SW 1/4NE1/4, SE1/4NW 1/4 and N1/2SE1/4
Beginning at the south sixteenth corner of said Section 11 and Section 10, a pipe and 31/4"
aluminum cap marked "HCE INC LS 19598"; thence North 00°36'06" East, a distance of
1304.89 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 11 and Section 10, a sandstone
marked "1/4"; thence along the north line of the north half of the south half of said
Section 11 North 88°58'30" East, a distance of 383.98 feet; thence South 01°54'05" East,
a distance of 1048.49 feet; thence South 00°36'06" West, a distance of 250.00 feet to the
south line of the north half of the south half of said Section 11; thence along said line
South 88°09'44" West, a distance of 430.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, 6TH P.M.
Section 1: Tract 37 being the same land described in the original survey as the NE1/4NEI/4 of said
Section 1
Section 2: Tract 43, being the same land described in the original survey as the SW1/4NE1/4 of
Section 2
Section 3: Tract42, being the same land described in the original survey as the SEI/4NE1/4 of said
Section 3
Tract 39: In Sections 3 and 4, being the same land described in the original survey as Lot 4 of
Section 3
Section 6: Tract 41, being the same land described under the original survey as Lot 4 of said Section
6.
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
Date Sent: 12/27/2005
Comments Due: 1/10/2006
Name of application: High Lonesome Lodge (SUP)
Sent to: Garfield County Road & Bridge Dept.
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the
Planning Department in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline. This form
may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as
necessary. Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: Mark Bean
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-3470
Phone: 970-945-8212
General Comments: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department has no problem with
this SUP with the following conditions and recommendations.
A stop sign shall be placed at any and all entrances to Garfield County Roads that are
being used for commercial purposes.
All signs and installations shall be as required by the MUTCD, (Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices). _
All accesses should have access permits on file with Garfield County Road & Bridge
Department or access permits should be issued to meet Road and Bridge standards.
No extra maintenance or snow lo .11 will be .rovided for other than what is normal)
provided at this time as a result of the approval of this SUP.
Name of review agency: Garfield County Road and Bridge Dept
By: Jake B. Mall
Date 1/03/2006
Revised 3/30/00
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
Date Sent: 12/27/2005
Comments Due: 1/10/2006
Name of application: High Lonesome Lodge (SUP)
Sent to: Garfield County Road & Bridge Dept.
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the
Planning Department in the event you are unable to respond by the deadline. This form
may be used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as
necessary. Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: Mark Bean
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-3470
Phone: 970-945-8212
General Comments: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department has no problem with
this SUP with the following conditions and recommendations.
A stop sign shall be placed at any and all entrances to Garfield County Roads that are
being used for commercial purposes.
All signs and installations shall be as required by the MUTCD, (Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices).
All accesses should have access permits on file with Garfield County Road & Bridge
Department or access permits should be issued to meet Road and Bridge standards.
No extra maintenance or snow plowing will be provided for other than what is normally
provided at this time as a result of the approval of this SUP.
Name of review agency: Garfield County Road and Bridge Dept
By: Jake B. Mall Date 1/03/2006
Revised 3/30/00
Mark Bean
From: Jim Sears
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:17'AM
To: Mark Bean
Subject: High Lonesome Lodge Special Use Permit
Mark: After review of the application for the High Lonesome Lodge Special Use Permit, the Sheriff's Office does not have
any comments/concerns on the application. It is recommended that the application be forwarded to the DeBeque Fire
Department for their review, as this location is in their fire district.
James H. Sears
Emergency Operations Commander
Garfield County Sheriff's Office
RECEIVE
JAN 1 3 2006
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
619 Shadowbrook Drive
Grand Junction, CO 81504
January 11, 2006'
Planning Dept.
.108 8th Street Suite 201
Garfield County Courthouse annex
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602-1069
To Whom It May Concern:
We have received your communication regarding the Special Use Permit application for a
resort entered by #10 Enterprises, LLC. We own undivided one-half interest in oil, gas
and other minerals rights to some of the affected property. Obviously we are not anxious
to see a resort placed on top of land where some drilling could occur. As you are aware,
this area near Rifle is rich with gas wells, and we would like to see the properties
developed where we are in involved: I am referring specifically to Township 8 South,
Range 99 West, 6 P.M. approximately 5 miles northwest of DeBeque off of County Road
200.
We hope that you can see our point of vie
retirees, any income is important to us.
and deny resort development here. As
Thank you for your attention to this matter..
Sincerely yours
Archie R. Urquhart
cc to: Dufford Waldeck Milburn & Krohn LLP
Attys. at Law
744 Horizon Ct.
Grand Junction, CO 81506
PUBLIC NOTICE
TAKE NOTICE that #10 Enterprises, LLC has applied to the Board of County Commissioners, Garfield
County, State of Colorado, to approve a Special Use Permit for a Resort, in connection with the following
described property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to -wit:
Legal Description:
Tract 40: in Sections 30 and 31 and in Sections 25 and 36, Township 5 South, Range 101 West, 601 P.M.,
according to the resurvey thereof, (The foregoing property formerly has been described as follows:
SE1/4NW1/4; E'/ SW'/a and Lot 4 in Section 30; E'/ANW'/, W1/4NE1/4, NE'/NE1/4, NW'/SE%, E'/:SW%, and
Lots 3 and 4, Section 31, Township 5 South, Rate 100 West, 6`h PM.; and Lot 2 in Section 4 and Lot 1 in
Section 5, Township 6 South, Range 101 West, 6" P.M.
TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 100 WEST, 6'h P.M.
Section 31: SE'/4, SE'/NW'/ and E'/SW'/
TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 101 WEST, 6'h P.M.
Section 2: Lot 3 and NW'/SW'/4
Section 3: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, N1/4SW'/4, SE'/SW1/4 and SE'/4
Section I I: SW%SE1/4 and SW'/
Section 14: N'h
Section 15: E1/4NE'/4
Section 23: SE'/4NE'/4 and E1/4SE1/4
Section 24: NE'/4, NE'/4NW'/4, W1/4NWV4 and W1/4SW'/4
Section 25: W1/4NW1/4
Section 26: E1/4NE''/4
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, 6TH P.M.
Section 16: SW'/4SW'/4
Section 17: SE'/SE'/4
Section 18: SW'/SE1/4, NE'/4SE'/4
Section 19: Lot 9, N1/4NE'/4
Section 20: N''N'/
Section 28: Lots I, 2, 3 and 7
Section 29: Lot 2, SE'/4NW'/4, S1/4NE'/4, N1/4SE1/4, SW'/4SW'/4, E1/4SW1/4
Section 30: Lots 10, 11 and 13; SE'/4SE'/4
Section 32: NE1/4NW'/4
Section 35: NE1/4SE1/4 and Lots 2 and 5
Section 36: Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10
Tract 50: Being the same land described under the original survey as the N1/4SW1/4 of Section 26,
the NEY SE'/4 and SE'/NE1/4 of Section 27
Tract 51: Being the same land described under the original survey as the S1/4SW''/4 of Section 26,
SE'/ SE'/4 of Section 27 and the NE'/4NW 1/4 of Section 35
Tract 52: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW'/NEY, E1/4NW'/4, and
the NW''hNW1/4 of Section 27
Tract 54: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW'/<SE'/ of Section 27,
the E% of Section 34, and the NW'/4NW1/4, S%:NW'/o, and the SW'/ of Section 35 (less
three (3) acres in Section 35)
Tract 55: Being the same land described under the original survey as the N''/,N'/, of Section 28
Tract 56: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW'/,NE'/<, SE'/<NW'/<
and the N'/,SW'/ of Section 28
Tract 59: Being the same land described under the original survey as the N%,NE'/, and the
SE''%NE'/4 of Section 35, and the SW'/<NW'/4 of Section 36
Tract 60: Being the same land described under the original survey as the W1/4SE'/4 and the
N'/2SW1/4 of Section 36
Tract 61: Being the same land described under the original survey as the Lot 4 in Section 31,
Township 7 South, Range 98 West; and the SE''%SEY of Section 36, Township 7 South,
Range 99 West
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 100 WEST, 6TR P.M.
Section 15: N1/4SE1/4, NE'/SW1/4, and Lots 1, 2 and 4
Section 16: Lot 2
Section 18: SE'/ NE'',4
Tracts 48G and 48H
Tract 39: Being the same land described under the original survey as the S'/2NE'/4, SE1/4NW'/4 of
Section 25
Tract 40: Being the same land described under the original survey as the E1/4SW'/4, and W'/2SE1/4 of
Section 25
Tract 42: Being the same land described under the original survey as the S1/2SW1/4 and SW'/4SE1/4
of Section 23, and NW1/4NE1/4 of Section 26
Tract 43: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW'/4NW1/4 and
NW' SW'/4 of Section 25, and SE1/4NE1/4 and NESE'/4 of Section 26
Tract 44: Being the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4NE1/4 of Section 26
Tract 45: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SW'/4NE'/4, NW1/4SE'/4
and NE'/4SW'/4 of Section26
Tract 57: Being the same land described under the original survey as the NE1/4SE'/4 of Section 25,
Township 7 South, Range 100 West; and Lot 3, the NE1/4SW'/4 and the NW'/4SE'/4 of
Section 30, Township 7 South, Range 99 West
Tract 58: Being the same land described under the original survey as the SE1/4SE'/4 of Section 25,
Township 7 South, Range 100 West; Lot 4 of Section 30 and Lot 1 of Section 31 in
Township 7 South, Range 99 West, and NE'/4NE'/4 of Section 36, Township 7 South,
Range 100 West
TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 98 WEST, 6TH P.M.
Section 6: NW1/4SE'/4, NE'/SW1/4, SE1/4NW'/4, SW1/4NE'/4, S1/4SE'/4, and Lot 4, being the same land
described under the original survey as the NW1/4NW'/4 of said Section 6
Section 7: N'VNE'/4, EXCEPT a one acre tract as described in deed recorded in Book 181 at Page
317, records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder
Section 8: NW1/4NE1/4, N1/4NW1/4, SW'/qNW'/<
Section 9: W''NE1/4, SE1/4NE1/4
Section 10: SW1/4NW'/4, NE1/4SW'/4, SW1/4NE1/4, SE'/NW'/4 and N'/2SE%
A tract of land in the SE1/4NW1/4 of Section 10, Township 8 South, Range 98 West of the 66 P.M., more
particularly described as follows:
2
Beginning at the Northeast comer of said SE'/,NW'/<, thence S. 00°05'05" W. 729.80 feet along the East
line of said SE''ANW%; thence S. 89°50'50" W. 298.34 feet; thence N. 00°04'09" E. 729.80 feet to the
North line of said SE'NW'/<; thence N. 89°50'50" E. 298.54 feet along said North line to the point of
beginning, and containing 5.00 acres, more or less. (All bearings in this description are relative to the
North line of said Section 10 being called N. 89°58'W., a brass cap in place for the Northwest corner of
said Section 10, and a post in a mound of rocks for the Northeast corner of said Section 10.)
Section 11: N'AS'A
Section 12: NE'/SW'/
TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 99 WEST, 6TH P.M.
Section 1: Tract 37 being the same land described in the original survey as the NE''ANE'/4 of said
Section 1
Section 2: Tract: 43, being the same land described in the original survey as the SW''ANE'/4 of
Section 2
Section 3: Tract 42, being the same land described in the original survey as the SE'/QNE'/4 of said
Section 3
Tract 39: In Sections 3 and 4, being the same land described in the original survey as Lot 4 of
Section 3
Section 6: Tract 41, being the same land described under the original survey as Lot 4 of said Section
6.
Practical Description: Approximately 5 miles northwest of DeBeque off of County Road 200
Said Special Use Permit is to allow the petitioners to operate a Resort for up to 35 guests on the
property
All persons affected by the proposed Special Use Permit are invited to appear and state their views, support
or objections. If you cannot appear personally at this hearing, then you may state your views by letter, as
the County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of surrounding,property owners and
others affected by the proposed Special Use Permit. This application may be reviewed at the office of the
Planning Depaituient, located at 108 8111 Street, Suite 201, Garfield County Courthouse annex, Glenwood
Springs, Colorado, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The public hearing on the application before the County Commissioners has been set for the 16°i day of
January, 2006, at the hour of 1:15 p.m., at the Office of the County Commissioners, Garfield County
Courthouse, Suite 100, 108 811' Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
Planning Department
Garfield County
3