HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit-r.
Job Address
No. 67.5
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING SANITATION arm/ PLANNtNGDEPARTMENT
109 8th Street Suitc 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado $1601
(303) 945-8212
Nature of Work / Building Permit
[Tsc of Building SIF
Own . V at rNSI
Contractor
c.rlao,�c�a1��
Amount of Permit $ e J
plan c �c ( Z1
Date CP l 1 9'2
au
„A
Clerk
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Tk LFL I '•INi;:. (970) 945-8212
GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO
INSPECTION LINE: (970) 945-9159
Applicant to complete numbered spaces l . PERMIT NO. PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO.
(r.4I iJ 1 Zen 1
JOB ADDRESS: 0 1 9 ,(,�_. , li �A v 1,���
�� ,$ 16 'l3
1
LC1T NO. r( 6 BLOCK NO. SUBDIVLSIONIEXEMPTION 6;005i Crek ( 0
.
2
OWNER `JA)iV` Si IrIe) Ir1 !f(i_
MP7 Fs4 p5Ui611S, IJ TlSry I+ [�6-i
'fl -(17
5MKP992:1`
16Z.ti
3
"illACTOR-DP\V 1) 'hur cj i tt ldev
Psa L7
ADDR.bx L60al (3/1-6A-(4- g)(07-1
PIL�2�
�7-Li/0c
UO:
N
4
ADDREss (910 0 �i kfuli f J R 5 it 4 4- 1,.- (
PH.
TIC NO:
AT Cfl[LEC[ET OQIEEIT 1 (Ai ..„ p.m 5
5
SQ. ET_ OF BU LD NU 2 7 00
Q. RT: OF W`/VL.
T 5 _��s
IuucMt 3,3 (
NO, DMHADR9
/'
y�
6
QRE Of BUILDING i.luC -
1 e. --S. i_C -4 L
7
�s l'._.
DESCRIBE WORK: CKATY♦ iT C T -t `"{ 5 =
8
ALT'
Did= OF WOREA /�W SAnDmQN PALTEMA11QN WOVE oA@lOVB
99
710
GARAISE: ULE )(ROUBLE CARPORT: oBINCI,E MDOUBLE
D DRIVEWAY PERMIT 4{S&rE SEWAGEDAPOSAL i�11C1 :MITEPIAN
!
VALUATION OP WORK: t / /.} ? � Fe 1% r/
ADJUSTED VALUATION:1110
f `f //1' UX
SPECIAL. coNDmONS:
/9/ ' A 43 /6X11A/at/At, ViogL 4 6,.Xv7`,1L i9�,� ' J
/t- x'�.nJe) J, � P6x d t - ii'I A 1.1 �L
NOTICE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST HE ISSUED
COLORADO.
PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN ISO DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION
SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FORA PERIOD OF IBD DAYS AT ANY
IS COMMENCED.
L HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WUTI WHETHER
HEREIN OR NOT_ THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
AUTHORITY ID VIOLATE, OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY
LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE
CON UCTION.
e ...
r
f�
BY THE STATE OF
AUTHORIZED
OR WORK IS
TIME AFTER WORK
APPLICATION AND
OF LAWS
SPECIFIED
PRESUME TO GIVE
arum STATE OR
PERFORMANCE OF
�
.5) 4.11g
PLAN CHECK FM
!
+ l 7 J /
PERMIT FEE:
_7;, 91
S.'--.THI5
TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED:
KL. 3,(a, 3 , //r,
��( j
OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE:
a 3 4, Li/ /1
V
ZONING:
SETBACKS:
,.11/1..4...4_/1.
Sigwtmn Contractor or aufhotiari having tcrd and
11 a r h. -16-9'
onticc above.
���
O1YLE.
u�
ISDSNO. & FEE:
�Jt1 ��
Building Dept. rova 6 APPew.UDete
P
Com )
PERMISSION I5 HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER ID CONSTRUCT THE STI CWURL AS
DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMLTIED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY
GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT ID AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED_ THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT W THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY
COMPLIED WITH JN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM I'IHE
COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE.
CORRECTION OF ERRORS JN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION
OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBLLffIES
ORLIABILCTB .S BY GARFIELD COUNTY FORERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRI CT1ON
REST'S SPECIFICALLY WIIHTHE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENIJED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN RT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST
Garfoms.no3 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE TI IAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. f INITIALI ��c1aw 1
h fe�3 .96 aciik 15$d
5/J `FM pia,,., ✓
ti
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2. Permanent address assigned by the Garfield County Building Department posted where
readily visible from access road.
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, kitchen
floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary
plumbing.
4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot & cold running, water,
floors and walls finished an a privacy door.
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guardrails on balconies
or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements.
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building.
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e., weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued
until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit #
Signature
prmtcond.lst
AA. lq___ar stitlicv
Date
/ 7
-
047 ci),4; 7, 4r; ,24.5:
41-/#7 / 14(4 G .?" _
ge
7/725`'
'S�
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
April 24, 1998
David and Sigrid Murray
P.O. Box 1995
Basalt, Colorado 81621
5020 Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 970 945-8454
Phone 970 945-7988
Job No. 198 252
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence and Barn, Lot 1B, Goose Creek Subdivision, 183 Blue Heron
Lane, Near Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Murray:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to you dated April 10, 1998. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the
proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame
structure. A barn with an upper level of living area is proposed about 40 feet to the
northwest of the residence. Both structures will have slab -on -grade floors. Cut depths
are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of
construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of
construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located about 40 to 50 feet
southwest of the proposed barn.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant and covered with about 3 inches of snow at the
time of our field work. The ground surface in the building area is relatively flat with a
gentle slope down to the north. An existing pond is located about 100 feet to the north
of the proposed barn. A ditch connects the pond to an existing wetlands south of the
site. The lot is vegetated with grass and weeds. Cattails are present near the pond to
the north.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits (one in each proposed building area) and one profile pit
David and Sigrid Murray
April 24, 1998
Page 2
in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of
the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about one foot of
topsoil and nil to 3 feet of slightly organic silt and sand consist of relatively dense
slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. Results of a gradation analysis
performed on a sample of the gravels (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are
presented on Fig. 3. Groundwater was observed in the pits at the time of excavation at
a depth of about 41/2 feet and the upper soils were moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on the undisturbed natural gravels designed for an allowable soil
bearing pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed residence and garage. Due to
the relatively shallow groundwater, excavation dewatering may be needed for
construction of the footings. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for
continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the
foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing
bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural gravels. Exterior footings
should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is
typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and
bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should be designed to
resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf
for the on-site soil (excluding oversized rock) as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural gravel soils, are suitable to support lightly to moderately
loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with
expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints
should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint
spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on
experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel
should be placed beneath slabs to facilitate drainage and act as a leveling course. This
material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4
sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
H -P GEOTECH
David and Sigrid Murray
April 24, 1998
Page 3
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence and garage have been
completed:
1) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
2) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on April 15, 1998 to evaluate
the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and
three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow
backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in
the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and
consist of about 1 foot of topsoil overlying slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and
boulders. The percolation test results are presented in Table I. The percolation test
result indicate an infiltration rate between 4 and 20 minutes per inch with an average of
about 13 minutes per inch. The percolation rates were based on the last three readings
of the test. Based on the shallow groundwater, a "mounded" system may be needed.
The county may require that the septic disposal system be designed by a civil engineer.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at
the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience
W -P GEOTECH
David and Sigrid Murray
April 24, 1998
Page 4
in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEP . ORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Daniel E. Hardin, P.
JZA/ksm/rso
attachments
H -P GEOTECH
APPROXIMATESCALE
1"= 80'
EXISTING
DITCH -
1
1
ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT
( BLUE HERON LANE )
P 1 P 2
a a
• PROFILE PIT 1
PIT ■
P 3
A PROPOSED 1
BARN 1 1
1 1
1 1
LOT 1B l 1
r 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
PIT 2 ! l
■ 11
rr
PROPOSED 1 1
RESIDENCE ! 1
1,-r
1wl
1(LO
1,1
rr
`s0/C
▪ c1D1
se,,, 1 1
• ` CINE 1
• r
l 1
1 1
EXISTING 1 1
POND 1 1
1 1
LOT 1 A 1 1
I
198 252
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES
Fig. 1
0
5
10
LEGEND:
/-1
NOTES:
PIT 1
- 1 +4=82
— J —200=1
P1T 2
•
PROFILE PIT
TOPSOIL; sandy silt and clay, organic, medium stiff, moist, dark brown.
SAND AND SILT (SM—ML); clayey, slightly organic, medium stiff, reddish brown, porous.
0
5
10
GRAVEL (GP); sandy, with cobbles and boulders, dense, slightly moist to wet below water
levels, brown to reddish brown, subrounded to rounded rock.
2" Diameter hand driven liner sample.
Disturbed bulk sample.
Free water level at the time of excavation.
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 14, 1998 with a backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features an the site
plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree
implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown an the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated.
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
+4 = Percent retained an No. 4 sieve
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
198 252
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHN4CAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Fig. 2
Naionommim
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
24 14R. 7 HR
45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MINAS MIN. 4 MIN.
100
90
60
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
a
.001
SIEVE ANALYSIS
1 MIN.
4200
U.5. STANDARD SERIES
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
POO 450 130 416 fa #4 3/11'1/2'3/4" 1 T/2" r 5'6' 60
1
1-
1
.002 .005 .009 .019 .0.37 .074 .150
CLAY TO SILT
.300 .600
1.16 2.36
4.75
9.512.5 19.0
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
FINE
SANG
198 252
GRAVEL 82 %
MEDRJM (COARSE
GRAVEL
FINE
37.5
COARSE
10
20
30
78.2 152 203
127
COHERES
SAND 17 % SILT AND CLAY 1 %
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX
SAMPLE OF: Sandy Gravel with Cobbles FROM: Pit 1 at 3 to 4 Feet
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
40
Sa
60
70
80
90
100
'C TR . N 1
Fig. 3
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 252
HOLE NO.
P-1
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
34
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER
DEPTH AT
START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER
DEPTH AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN.IINCH)
15
water added
water added
water added
water added
water added
water added
water added
10'/z
41/2
6
10
41/2
572
10
5
5
9'/2
5
41/2
9
51/4
33/4
9'/3
6
3'/Z
9'/2
6
3'/2
9
516
3'/2
4
P-2
381/2
15
12'/2
121/2
12'/2
12'/3
12'/2
121/4
'/4
12'/4
3/4
111/2
11
'/2
11
101/4
3/4
1034
91/2
34
9'/2
8%
P-3
34
15
water added
water added
water added
7
6
3/4
1
20
6
5
1
8
7
1
7
6
1
8
7
1
7
6
1
6
8
5 1
7 1
15
NOTE: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and soaked on April 15, 1998.
The holes were protected from freezing overnight with rigid foam insulation. Percolation tests were
conducted on April 11, 1998. The percolation rate was based on the last three readings of the test.
Apr -03-98 02:03P Stella Archuleta
970-945-7785
P.05
1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to
pc , lines, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements?
Yes . 6 C' _.
2. Does the site plan include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System)
and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties),
beams o water courses?
(Yes�V
3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
sem-+ 5 m , 1-1 (0-0
4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design? ecY r ,�,iuk. SW
Ao-uk 5±A utkikNeal' 41.
5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spats and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Y S
(4.16-'
ivy ria
6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist
pass d soffits?
(Yes
7. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof
snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County), floor loads and
wind loads?
Lc) toe- LM s '1 p +2 u6-`�-r cAc - .512-/
8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof
r,rugtion7
Yes j ,./
9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joist5, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
%U ((L.L. fro tZ 6[c- { 1d c i- .
10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns beams?
Yes' (,U(( L�r {� 2 c ,L .• 5-12,1
2
Apr -03-98 02:05P Stella Archuleta
970-945-7785 P.06
11, Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to
ng grade contours?
12, Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado hase 11 certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes �No1
13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the Uniform Buildin: Codi Chapter 37?
Yes ✓
14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms andior basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building
e? /
Yes +✓
No
15 Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
No
16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface, sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
an specifyjsafety glazing for these areas?
es
No
17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated o the plan?
No
18, Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants?
es
No
19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from
the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the
hitectur committee deny or reject your building plans?
est No
3
Apr -03-98 02:06P Stella Archuleta
970-945-7785
20. Wi11 this be the only residential ctvrF on the parcel?
Yes No ,% If no -Explain:
21. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
lYesi
P.07
22. Is this an application for the placement pf a manufactured home?
Yes w/
If yes, have you specified the size of the unit (min. 20ft, x 20ft.); live roof load (min. 404);
wind design (min. wind speed of 80 mph & 15 lb. wind load); foundation design; method of
anchoring?
Yes
23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
Yecton code requirements?
�f No
24, Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
1 ection y the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes No
25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required grAt
tohe applycation of these changes?
(`yes LJ No
26, Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any
"School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building
No
27. Are you aware that twenty four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?
Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and
from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be
called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00
p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty four (24) hour notice for inspections will
ay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 945-9159.
�LZ No
28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform
Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of
• upaney nd occupancy of the building?
No
4
Apr -03-98 02:08P Stella Archuleta
970-945-7785 P.08
29, Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent
of the Owner', "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for
th rojec omplying with the Uniform Building Code?
No
1 hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best
of my ability.
signatu
Phone:
q2-1 � ( (days);
Project Name:
514 g
date
Project Address: i� P, � (Cn41 e. -c) lot)
Notes
7(everungs)
if you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the
Building Official prior to beginning the pian review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may
not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is
necessary to r:view the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required
information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit
or delay in proceeding with construction.
PerAppO2.95 Effective August 15, 1995
5
n W
• INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issue/40i '15
.Zoned Area Permit No. .Lti, r.i.. .5.!
AGREEM ENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
use W� r
Address or Legal Descriptionfrmniltut
f (0
Owner " vi ti 411" S S. 45r t Nviu ontractor ble1
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing_ 3--- rt cp A R, A/0--
Foundation CF— / J - G� /- P L„\., >- -- ,
Underground Plumbing z-1 t`fL� 5.4r.« -.-Insulation
f r - rC_-9
r
Rough Plumbing I/-/ _ l 1 .tf•
1
Drywall /!_ , _47.ic_✓
Chimney &. Vent /i_ l -�% , .
Electric Final (byState Ins ector
Gas Piping .(-,_ 6 ..f, ;.- /�'z.•, L
Final a--.. i -- 1 /_<;_i_.,L,
Electric Rough (By State Inspector)114.1
Septic Final / / _ p - * v y,_
Framing Pe / 0Icer , 1/_G ' '/ -
(To include Roof in plava'I d Windows
and Doors installed).
_ Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHE'I'HER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
`� 1 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 945_-' 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
?-111.
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date_,
yit 6de r) /sat
IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC