The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 ApplicationJERIS A. DANIELSON State Engineer OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 FAX [303] 866-3589 January 70,7992 Mr. Andrew McGregor, Planner Garfield County Planning Dept. 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Wooderr Deer Subdivrsron Sec. 24 & 25, T7S, R88W, 6TH PM W. Division 5, W. District 38 Dear Mr. McGregor: We have reviewed the sketch plan materials for the above referenced proposal to subdivide a L01..72 acre parcel into 22 lots varying in size fuom 9.29 to 2.0 acres. Each Iot will contain one primary dwelling and one guest house which will not exceed 900 square feet. The irrigated area for each lot will be limited to 2,000 square feet and no cattle or horses will be boarded on the site. The proposed water service is to be from a central water system, supplied by up to 6 wells located on the project site. The combined production from the wells will be limited to 100 gallons per minute and an annual diversion of 15.5 acre feet. The wells will be augmented with water from the Basalt Water Conservancy District. The project is located in area 'A', which indicates that District water can fully augment stream depletions. The applicant has filed an application for the 6 wells and a plan for augmentation with the Division 5 Water Court in Case i.lumber 91CW189. Any wells that will operate under an augmentation or replacement plan must be Iocated at least 600 feet from any existing well. If a well is located within that distance, then the applicant must obtain a waiver from the well owner indicating that they do not object to the new well. Since the proposed water supply depends on operation of an augmentation plan, a homeowners association should be formed to carrSr out administration of the plan and maintenance of water supply system. Mr. Andrew McGregor January 70, 'J.992 Page 2 We have no objection to the proposal at this stage, however we request that prior to final approval, we have the opportunity to comment on the adequacy of the Water Court decreed plan for augmentation. If you have any question, please contact John Schurer of this office. hottam Dass, P.E. Supervising Water Resource Engineer PD,/JS,/woodside cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer Bruce DeBrine John Eckhardt Grand Junction Regional Office 2225.6th Street, Room 232 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2768 Telefax Number: (303) 24&7198 ROY ROMER Governor JOEL KOHN Interim Executive DirectorCOI,ORADO DEPARTMENTOFAHEALTH December 27. i991 Garfield Countr. Plannins DeDa.rtment 109 8th St., Suite 303 Glenwood Sprinqs, CO 81601 Attn: Andrew McGreqor. Planner RE: Wooden Deer Sketch Plan Dear A,ndrew: t{e have the following comments reqarding the sub.ject proposal. The Iot sizes proposed will certainly accommodate septic svstems. }{e would be concerned about the pJ-acement of the drinkinq water wells in relation to the Iocation of the individual leach fields. I{e have been approached by a representative of Aspen Glen Development regarding an apDroximately 800 unit golf course subdivision. ire have requested that the developer perform a 201-like study to identify the -[onq term conprehensive plan tor the area and how that wi. 11 relate to water otralit.v* in the area. The area that this 201-like study might encomDass may include the sub.iect proposed development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. contact me at 248-7L5O, If you have any questions' please Dwain P. Watson West Slope District Technician Water QuaIiLy Contro.l" Division DPW/csk Field Services Section, CDH Fi le ruNnoc cn3tJtftre, 1661 I S.cm @ ninted on ,ec!.l"d eaw, GARFIELD COUNTY REGULATORY OFFICES AND PERSONNEL January 14,1992 Scott Writer, President Carbondale Land Development Corporation Post Office Rox 9705 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Wooden Deer Subdivision Sketch Plan Dear Scott: At their meeting on January 8,1992,the Garflreld County Planning Commission discussecl your subdivision sketch plan. In addition to those comments voiced by staff in the packet, the Planning Commission had the following comments: l. Theapplicant should consider requiring sprinklers foreach single family residence. The hre hazard would be exacerbated by the abundance ol'trees. 2. Concern that restricting outdoor lighting might jeop ardize public safety and enco urage crime. Another commissioner expressed concerns about too much outdoor lighting and suggested that the developer restrict light quantities as a function o[ the restrictive covenants. 3. The applicant should consider the potential inrpacts of the proposal to C.R. 103 and consider making improvements to ollset those impacts. 4. A suggestion was made to consider increasing the size of water lines to six (6) inchcs and add fire hydrants. 109 8TH STREET, SUTTE 303 , 945-82t2/625-557t1285-7972 . GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO S 160I Scott Writer, President Page2 January 14,1992 There is one (l) additional item that has not beeu mentioned that may have some bearing on your project. This is Section 5.04.01 of the Zorung Resolution (see enclosed). This section places limitations on development on lets with slopes in excess of forty (40) percent. This may or may not eflect lots within your proposed development. If you have any questions, give me a call. Sincerely, Andrew C. McGregor Planner ACM/rlb Enclosure Conditional and SPecial Uscs 5.03.13 5.04 s.04.01 5.04.02 5.03. t3 Broactcasting Stuclio and/or Communication Towers: Such hroadcilsting rt,rdi"r ,na6a-comnr,rnication towers shall bc approvetl by the Federal-Co**uni"ation Commission antl the Fedcral Aviation Adrninistration, where appropriate. (A. 84-78) SUPPLEMENTARY LOT AREA RI]GUI.ATIONS I_ot Slope Determinations: In tjetermining .l9t ..tlo.p..t for use in @earequirementsandbuildableitrea,existing and propo"sed lots o[ less than two (2) acres-shall be calcrrlated on an inOiviauit lot basis. Contour intervals'of five (5) feet or less shall bc trsed to make this determination. For lots o[ two (2) or more acres in sizc and tracts of land proposed for other methotis o[ develoPment wherein creation of indivictuat lots within saicl tract is not anticipatecl, t.hj' determination of lot slope shall be marle utilizing available topographic maps. Development Limitations Based on Int- Stope: Land y.lol: original and @ioe*ce.'offoriypercent(,|ovo).shall.notbe credited to*urd lot area in determining whether a lot meets the minimum lot area requirements set tbrth in the ione clistrict regulations, except that ;, i; one-lialt (ltz) of. the requirenrent for open space may be contprised o'f lands in excess'of forty percent $OVo) in slope, and no structures or use- invotving the disturbance of the'lan<i shall be allowed unless lateral rrpp*t is piovicted to any affected adjacent landowners, as clenlonstrated by fhe materials required by this section. In addition to all other requirements of this Resolution and all other County regulations, the foliowing special requirements shall apply -to develo'pmeit tuh"r" slopes are greater than tbrty percent (!9E"),and the required materials listed hereunder shall be submitted with the permtt application: (1) A soil and foundation investigation must be prepared and bertr the ielt of a registered, prot'essional engineer. (2) Foundtrtions must be designecl by and bear the scal ol- a registered, professional cngineer. (3) A topographic survey must tre prepared by a registt:re<l surveyor, *iitr contour intervals o[ not more lhan two (2) feet. (4) Structures must be designed try a licensed architect' (5) A site grading and drainage plan shall be required' (6) A detaile<l plan o[ retaining walls or cuts, and fitls in excess of fivc (5) feet, shall be required. (7) A detailecl revegetation plan shall be required. (A 80-180) 66