The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7.0 Resolution 80-258STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield l" At a...............,..f.e.91t.I.9,f, ....meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, hcld at the Court Flouse in Glenwood Springs on...............I1onday....... thc.............27.th............day of """"'o'c't'e'hq'" --.----ui.Jnf".'ll;:: iiii:;:::*. commissioner chairman .............L4ffy....VeIaS.q.ue.z................. , commissioner .............8}.ey..9.n...C.er.i.S.g. , commissione! ::::::::::::$5:li}lshtf i-*la315-g.[*:!;I'],T:I"J. wben the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit: -.:, RESOLUTION NO. 80-258 RESOLUIION CONCERIIED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A ZOi'iE DISTRICT A},IENDMENT TO THE GARFIELD COUNTY ZONING P.ESOLUTION REQUESTED BY GENE R. HILTON AND RANCH I\IVESTMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, Gene R. Hilton and Ranch fnvestment Corporationhave filed a petition with the'Board of County Commissionersof Garfield. county requesti-ng a zone district amendment torezone portions of Lots B, 9, L2, SE/4SW/4 of Sect,ion 4,Lot 10 of Section 5 and NI,V/4NE/4 of Section g, Township 6south, Range 91 lilest, in Garfield County, from Agricultural-/Residentj-al,/Rura1 Densit.y and Agricultural/fndustrial ZoneDistricts, !o Plagned_U_nit Developmen! Zqne District and. for -apProval of*9!ae.-.p1an of Wood landlng Planned. Unit Development,hereinafter referred to as the ',development"; and. ' WHEREAS, publichearingswere held by this Board onthe 5th and l8t,h of August, and. the 6th of October, 1980, and the Board has personally visited the site and travelledthe af fected, :iighwa;*s; and WIIEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits,study of the General Plan for the unincorporated area of the County, comments of the Garfield County Planning Department, comments of public cfficj-als and. agencies, comments from allinterested parties and perscnal observations of the Board.,this Board. f i-nds as follows: 1. That proper publication and. public notice wasprovided as required by law for the hearing before the Board; 2. That +-he hearing before the Board. was extensive andcomplete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues weresubmitted and that all interested parties were heard at thathearing; 3. That, during the public hearing process, several t' substantial modifications were made to the p1an, upon whichmodifications the approval of the application d.epends; 4. That the Garfield County Planning Commission has reconimended to this Board that the requested rezoni-ng and.planr dS mod,ified through the 8th of September, 1980, beapproved, provided that certain conditions be compried with; 5. That the proposed l-and use will be compatible withexisting and permitted land uses in all directioni, exceptthat present roaos serving the site are presently inadequateto bear the additional traffic which would be generated bythe proposed development which deficiency may be susceptibleof resolution by negotiation between the appricants and theBoard; 6. That for the above-stated and other reasons,approval of the proposed deve'lopment, the proposed zoningand proposed planr dS modified, is in the best interest ofthe health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield county, if certainconditions contained herein are complied with;. q. ! i I I l i i " 7. That the traffic problerns related to County Road 335 , which is the only highway serring the subject property, are sufficiently serious that, if improvements necessary to provide safe travel are not assured, the Board, in the interests of public safety, would be required to cleny the requested zone. clistrict amendment and to disapprove the subject Planned Unit Development plan; 8. That Garfield County has insufficient funds provide for the required road improvements, that there presently no evidence that additional development will in any location which would contribute significantly to occur the need for the road improvements required by the requested Planned Unit Development plan, and that therefore the requested Planned Unit Development plan aPpears to be soleIy responsible for and associated with the road. improvements which will be necessitated for County Road 335 i 9. That, other than in the foregoing particulars, the requested zone change amendment and plan approval are in general in conformity with the General Plan for Garfield. County, Colorado, and meet all'requj-rements of the Zoning Resotution of Garfield County, and further than the requested Planned Unit Development is suitable and appropriate for the subject property considering the location, conditj-on and circurnstances of said property, and that the proposed amendment i-mplements the purposes and meets the standards and, requirements of the Planned Unit Development provisions of Garfield County Zoninqr Resolution, provided that certain conditicns contained herein be ccmplieC with ryOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado: Section 1. That the peii-.ion of Gene R. Hj-lto- and Ranch Itvestment Corporation for a zone change from Agricu'l- tural/Residential,/Rura1 Density and. Agricultural,/Industrial Zone Districts co Planned Unit Developn,:nt Zone Dj.strict for the foregoing described. unincorporated area of Garfield CountY, and for approval of the Plan of Wood. Landing Planned Unit De- velopment, may be approved only upon the resolution of traffic problems related to County Road 335, presentJ-y serving the subject property, and upon negotiation of an agreement between the applicants and the Board providing for the resolution of such d.ifficulty at no expense to Garfiel-d Countyr on or before the 5th day of January, 1981, upon which occasicn this Board will approve the requested zone district map amendment and Planned Unit Development p1an, uPon the following conditions: €1. Any plat approved. as a part of Wood, Land.ing Planned, Unit Deveiopment (hereinafter the "development") sha1l substan- tially comply with the sketch plan submitted. to the Board on the 6th of October, 1980; b. The phasing of the d.evelopment shalL assure that impact on the neighborhood be limited to the extent thatpublic improvements and servj-ces may properly deal with such impact i c. The applicants shall.provide a fire station site, buiLding space, 3/4 ton tiuck with a "drop-in" unit and other equipment to the Silt-Nerv Castle Fire Protection Dis-trict (estimated cost in 1980 $18,000), which station would provide needed fire protection south of the ColoradoRiver necessitated by the developmenti d. The aPPlicants sha-!-L pror-rrde a- fr-rnrls rn l-ier: ofdedication of lands for schools, in accordance with the pro- visions of the Garfield County Subdivision Resolution; tois \, \ t' ,-d e. The applicants shall provide within the developmenta park, baseball fie1d, basketball facility and playground; f. The development shaIl contain no more than 317residential lots having an average square footage of no morethan 51800 square feet, and no 1ot having less than 4,770 square feetr d.nd two multi-purpose commercial lots of similar size. E. the d"rrelopment shall in all ways comply with representations of the most recently amended plan, unlessotherwise directed by the Board either by this Resolutionor by other lawful action. Section 2. That upon the Boardrs determination thatll,asatisEc-toryreso1utionofthetrafficprobIemhasbeen reached, the Board shall authorize the requested amendment *of -the zgne=-district map affecting the subject property and qp*pJ_oving the Planned Unit Development PIan,.but, if the Board determj-nes that the aforementioned traffic problem may not be resolved without the expendj-ture of public funds,the Board sha11 take appropri-ate action to deny the requested'zone district amendrnent and to disapprove the Planned Unit Development plan Section 3. That the Planned Unit Development shalf '.consistffizoningDistricts,theboundariesofwhichshall be indicated upon the final plat or plats of Wood aLanding, a Planned Unit Development, which districts sha11 Residential Commercial Residential Section 4: That the uses permitted, within saiddistricts, together with the reguJ-ations afrecting the usage of t,he iancis containea therein, shall be as follows: ZONE DISTRICT . R,ESIDENTIAL o pubtic utilities and facilities; schoots; waten storage and playgnounds, and other similan uses- USES - SPECIAL: None MINIMUM LOT AREA: 4 '.77O squane Feet MAXIMUM LOT C)c)yrER qQE: 40 pencent excluding driveway and patio MINIMUM SETBACK: (1)Front Yand: USES BY RIGHT: Stngte-Family detached druetling -r--"r-- -J.-- uses, includi.ng Fences, hedges, gardens, walls and (3) Side Yand: Zeco lot tine on one side where thene clrruelting units. 5 Feet minimurn iF no and customary accessory stmilan lanCscaPe Feabunes; and imPoundments, Parks Locat Stneets ' 16 Feet minimum Fnom habitabte portion oF dwetling unit. 6 feet minimum to garage wall wher^e side entny garage is used' (2) Rear Yard: 1O Feet from nean lot line to building wall is 10 Feet on mone between adjoining zeno lot l[ne. IAAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BL,ILDINGS: 28 FECt lr,,lAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO: Finish ftoo" area nelative to lot anea (exclusive oF garage) .g/1 ADDTTICT\IAL REQUIREMENTS: All uses shatl be subject to ttre pnovisions unAcr Soction 5 (SupplementaqT Regulations) oF the GanField Coun$l Zoning Resolution oF 1978 as amcnded r> ZONE DISTRICT - Commercial/ Restdential USES - gV ntOF{T: Convenience store inctudtng gasotine purnps and underground stlrage tanks fon gasoline; si.ngle-Family detached o\ruelling and cusiomary accessony' uses, includi,ng fences, hedgesrgandens, walls and similan landscape Featunes; p-rblic uti.Iities and facilities; schools; waten storage and tmpoundments, parks and playgrounds' and othen similar uses. Commenci,al uses oF the two lots wi'I[ nequtre an eight Foot S6neen to be prorzided by commerciai pnopert5Z c'\ /nen to sepanate the commercial lot from adjoining nesidential tots' USES - SPECIAL: None MINIMUM LOT AREA: 1O,OOO squarr feet tvlAxIMUM LOT COVERAGE; so%' a.a IIINIMUT\4 SETBACK (1) Fnont- 16 teet Fnom cur{c (2) Side B Feet From lot line (3) Rean - I Feet Fnom ld tine AIAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDINq: 28 feet A AXIMUM FLOOR AP-EA R qTIO : .6/1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS :Atl uses shatt be subject to the pncvisions Regutations) oF the GarField Gount5r Zoning ..... o" t unden Section Resolution oF 3 (Supptementary 1978 as arnended ATTEST: Upoa motion STATE OF COLORADO CountY of Garfield BOARD OF' GARFIELD COUNTY COIO{ISSIONERS couNTY, COLORADO Coanissioaerr l- I,..............-......,CountyCierkandcx.;jll:i:3!::]::|th-.Be:ldo|eortnrvComrnissioners b rnd lor thc county and statc aforesaid rio hereby u€riif/ Jr.rt tir; ar-r,:xcd aii,J loregoing crder is ruly copicd iica the P'eccrcc c! tho hoceedingr of the Board of county comrnissioners for said Garfield county' now in my office' tN WIIlIESS UTHEREOF, I havc hetcunto rct my hand and effixed thc scal of raid County, at Glcnwood SPrin$' A. D. 19..............thlr.,........-.-..CountyCterkrndcx.officioClcrkofthcBoardotcountyCoramlssionrrg