HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application1
1
1
TAMARISK SUBDIVISION
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
FILING2
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
TO
PRELIMINARY PLAN
JANUARY 1981
PREPARED BY:
GINGERY ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
1310 UTE AVENUE
GRANO JUNCTION. COLO.
81501 13031245-0627
1attIement
"'Mesa
incorporated Charles L. Pence • President
759 Horizon Drive, Suite #3 • P.O. Box 308 • Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 • 303/245-1300
February 18, 1981
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Garfield County Planning Dept.
2014 Blake Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
RE: Preliminary plat for Tamarisk Filing #2
Gentlemen:
Submitted herewith is the Preliminary Plat for Tamarisk Filing #2 of
Battlement Mesa PUD. Attached please find the following:
1. Preliminary Plat
2. additional information, Preliminary Plat
3. Subdivision Summary Form
4. Covenent Description (draft)
5. Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan with street grades
6. Utility Plan
7. Cahier's Check for $2,250.00 for Filing Fee
8. Ruling of Referee- In the matter of the Application for Vater
Rights of Battlement Mesa, Inc., in the Colorado River in
Garfield County.
9. Letter dated January 30, 1981, from David J. Love, P.E. of
Wright -McLaughlin stating availability of water supply aria
Wastewater Treatment and projecting the schedule for ultimate
facilities.
The Geologic Report, Soils Report and Vegetation Map were submitted
with the PUD Rezoning Application. These reports plus the letter
dated April 15, 1980, from Mr. Perry D. Olson of.the Colorado Divi -
;,ion of Wildlife to Mr. Ray Baldwin of Garfield County should be used
for necessary reference.
The water and sanitary sewer systems for this subdivision are in ac-
cordance with the Master Plan of Augmentation prepared by Wriyht-
NcLauahlin Engineers, Inc. Initially, the water and wasterwater
treatment plants will be owned, operated and financed by Battlement
Mesa, Inc. These facilities will be in accordance with the Colorado
Department of Health Standards. In the future, a Water and Sanitation
District will be created to own, operate and finance these facilities.
Garfield County Planning Department
Page 2
Should any additional information be needed please contact our office.
Yours truly,
Charles L. Pence
CLP:djf
oncls.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Additional Information
Preliminary Plat
Tamarisk Filing #2
1. Subdivision name: Tamarisk Filing #2
2. Owner: Battlement Mesa, Inc.
P. O. Box 308
Grand Junciton, CO. 81502
3. There are no mortgages on the property.
4. Plat prepared by: Gingery Associates, Inc.
1310 Ute Ave. -
Grand Junction, CO. 81501
5. Battlement Mesa, Inc. owns all land adjacent to the proposed sub-
division.
6. The total area of land being subdivided is 105.9 acres.
7. A breakdown of the land use type is as follows:
a. Mobile Home 69.3 acres
b. Public rights-of-way 26.8 acres
c. Reserve for greenbelt & pathways 9.8 acres
8. Subdivision Summary Form is attached.
9. Public rights-of-way will be dedicated to Garfield County. The re-
serves for greenbelts and paveways will be conveyed in the future to
the Recreation District when it is created.
10. A brief description of the proposed covenants is attached.
11. This subdivision is in compliance with the Garfield County Zoning.
12. There is no nonresidential development in this subdivision.
13. Two off-street parking spaces are provided for each unit.
14. Agreements concerning schools, fire and police will be submitted
with the final plat.
Garfield
,Date
2/18/81
SUBDIVISION SUMMARY FORM
Type of Subdivision Mobile Home
Request for Exemption
Preliminary Plan
Final Plat
Filing
County
"Subdivision Name:
Tamarisk, Filing
#2
7 S 96W
x
13,24
cation of Subdivision TOWNSHIP 7 S RANGE 95W SEC.18,19 1/4
Owner(s) NAME
ADDRESS
ISubdivider(s) NAME
ADDRESS
'Designer NAME
ADDRESS
Battlement Mesa, Inc.
759 Horizon Dr , P. 0. Box 308, Grand Junction, Co 81502
Battlement_ Mesa. Inc.
759 Horizon Dry P. 0. Box 308, Grand Junction. Co $1502
Gin•er A so -s I,
1310 Ute Avenue. Grand Junction, Co 81501
Type of Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
Number of
Dwelling Units
Area % of
(Acres) Total Area
( ) Single Family
( ) Apartments
( ) Condominiums
( ) Mobile Home
( ) Commercial
( ) Industrial
430
Dedicated
Reserved
Dedicated
Reserved
Private Open
Easements
Other (specify)
Street
Walkways
School Sites
School Sites
Park Sites
Park Sites
Areas
Greenbelts
69.3 66%
26.8 250
9.8 9�
Total
105.9 100%
Estimated Water Requirements 140,000
IProposed Water Source Wells and Colorado River Gallons/day.
Estimated Sewage Disposal Requirement 107,500
Proposed Means of Sewage Disposal wastewater treatment by areation
Gallons/day.
1
ACTION:
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval ( )
Remarks
Date
Disapproval ( )
"Board of County Commissioners
Approval ( )
, 19
Disapproval ( )
Remarks
Date , 19
Im
Im E) OI4 COMPANY, U.S.A. A DIVISION OF EXXON CORPORATION
11 r°- Colony Shale Oil Project Agent Account
ENTRAL OFFICC
.o. SOX 1100
HOUSTON, 77001
1
1
INVOICE
DATE
INVOICE
NUMBER
PURCH. ORDER
NUMBER
GROSS
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT
VOUCHER
NUMBER
NET
AMOUNT
ieL)LUaiY iv, £dV+
IF FORM IS TO BE USED AS REOUEST FOR PAYMENT PLEASE ENTER DETAIL IN THIS SPACE'
Preliminary plat fees
Section 1-3 $2250.00
Tamarisk Filing #2
1
1
1
1
TOTAL TO PAT •
AUTHORIZED APPROVAL
SHOULD BE ON PAGE 2
1021
UNT PAYABLE (WRITTEN OUT)
Two thousand two hundred fifty and no/100's
AMOUNT
$2,250.00
NE AND ADDRESS OF PAYEE
1
1
1
r
Garfield County Treasurer
L J
NAME AND ADDRESS FOR DELIVERY TO OT ER THAN PATNA
SPECIAL APPROVAL AUTHORITY REQUIRED)•
-
REMITTANCE ADVICE
•
mi - - m — l I — — Nos e. i I I NEN Elio s4
E)(ON COMPANY, U.S.A.
A DIVISION OF EXXON CORPORATION
GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO--F-bruary 1R , tR81
10
CHECK NUMBER
1021
PAY Two thousand two hundred fifty and no/100's -$ 2,250.00
TO THE • Garfield County Treasurer
ORDER
OF
•
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
i:Lo2L003901: 0011 4L8 3u'
Mortgage Agreements or Statement That None Exist
THERE ARE NO MORTGAGES ON THIS PROPERTY
Proposed Terms of Reservations or Dedications of Public Sites
PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL BE DEDICATED
TO GARFIELD COUNTY. GREENBELTS AND
PAVEWAYS WILL BE CONVEYED IN THE FUTURE
TO A DISTRICT DEVELOPED FOR SUCH PURPOSE.
Proposed Covenants
PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED DOCUMENT
LANDS ARE NOT BEING CONVEYED THERE-
FORE COVENENTS DO NOT APPLY. HOW-
EVER, PLEASE FIND ATTACHED PROPOSED
RULES AND REGULATION FOR THE MOBILE
HOME PARK.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
BATTLEMENT MESA MOBILE HOME PARK
PROPOSED RULES AND REGULATIONS
The following rules and regulations apply to all tenants, their
families and guests:
1. The management has the responsibility to approve or reject
all applications for rental and/or lease space.
2. All tenants must register at the park office prior to moving
into the park. A rental agreement and/or lease contract
must be completed by each tenant. Any change in the data on
this form must be reported to the management immediately.
3. All rent is due on or before the first day of each month.
Payment must be made by check, money order or cash. A receipt
must be obtained from the manager as proof of rental payment
if cash is used. A late charge of
assessed for payment after the 5th
of the return of any check for any
rent for that month and all future
$2.00 per day will be
of the month. In the event
reason whatsoever, the
months must be payable in
certified funds or cash. In addition, a $10 charge will
be assessed for any check returned for insufficient funds.
4. The management should be notified as far in advance as possible
of any intention to vacate. Tenancies are on a month-to-month
basis and Colorado law requires a ten -days notice be given prior
to termination of the tenancy. If the required ten -days notice
is not given, any security deposit may be forfeited.
5. Subletting of any mobile home site and/or mobile home will not
be permitted without the written approval of the management.
6. Transfers of mobile homes from one space to another will be
permitted upon approval by the park management. Any cost
involved in such a move will be the responsibility of the
tenant --including the cost to clean-up the space which they
moved from.
7. The buyer of any mobile home located within the park who
wishes to become a tenant of the park must first get approval
by the management.
P. Neither the park nor its address may be used by any tenant for
*he purpose of advertising. No peddling, soliciting or
distribution of any type of product or services is allowed
within the park without the prior written approval by the
n:+.,_ management.
9. Loo, noises that disturb neighbors are not permitted; neither are
loud speakers, drunkenness, rowdiness, quarrelling, use of
abusive language nor any destruction of park property_ Any of
10.
these actions will be cause
Tenants are
park rules.
responsible for
for immediate eviction.
informing their guests of the _
Tenants are completely responsible for the conduct
of their guests. Any violation of these Rules and Regulations
by a guest is equivalent
tions by the tenant.
to violation of such Rules and Regula-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11. Tenants are required to maintain their premises in good order.
Tenants shall be held liable for any damage to park buildings,
grounds, or property if such damage is due to their conduct or
the conduct of their children, pets or guests.
12. A11 utilities, unless otherwise stated in a lease agreement,
are the responsibility of the tenant with regard to obtainment
and payment thereof.
13. No TV or radio antennas are permitted in the park. Cable TV
is supplied to each space.
14. Telephone messages will not be accepted or delivered by the
park office except in cases of dire emergency. Public
telephones will be provided throughout the park for tenants'
use.
15. If a tenant has a problem concerning a neighbor, an attempt
should be made to resolve the problem with the neighbor before
bringing the matter to the attention of the park management.
16. Tenants should not give instructions to or make requests of
the maintenance man or park contractor. All requests should
be made directly to the management during office hours.
17. No businesses will be permitted to operate within the park.
18. No patio sales or yard sales will be permitted in the park.
19. Tenants are responsible for the behavior of their children
and guests at all times whether or not they are present.
20. In the absence of the parent, children must be under the
personal supervision of a person designated by the parent who
is capable to and who does adequately control the children's
behavior. It is the responsibility of the parents to
designate a person suitable for that obligation. Colorado law
dictates that these persons must be at least 12 years of age
or older.
II 21. Children must play in their own yards or in the childrens
playground area, and must not trespass through the yards of
other tenants.
22 Occupancy of a space shall constitute acknowledgement that
the tenant has inspected the space, has accepted it as is, and
released the Park Owner and its agents from any responsibility
from injuries or damages occurring upon, _or.in=any way connected
with, the premises or nearby streets, and from any claims for
damages that may be caused from the re-entering and taking
possession of the space by the Park Owner and its agents under
the terms and conditions of these Rules and Regulations and
applicable law. Each tenant shall indemnify and hold the
Park Owner and its agents and employees free from any and
all claims for damage or injury for any cause whatsoever,
sustained by the tenant, any member of his family, or guests,
including but not limited to claims for damage or injury to
personal property.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
II
23. All trash receptacles must be approved by management. All
trash must be kept in plastic bags. Any trash, litter or
debris are to be kept picked up by the tenant. Violations
of this section will result in a written violation notice by
management stating the violation and asking that it be cured
within 24 hours following the receipt of such notice. Failure
to do so will result in eviction and termination of the tenancy.
24. The tenant is responsible for any service or repair bill
occurred without prior written approval of the management.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
RULES GOVERNING MOBILE HOME SITES
1. Mobile home sites shall remain under the direct control of
the management. Mobile homes must be parked on each lot in
a uniform manner. Upon arrival in the park, the manager will
instruct the driver as to the proper position for parking the
mobile home. An inspection and move -in permit will be issued
by the Garfield County Building Inspector.
2. Mobile homes brought into the park must be set up according to
park specifications. Sewer, water, and electric lines must
be connected according to Garfield County specifications.
Tenants may not enter existing park utility service facilities
or connections.
Blocking: Only large (B" x 16") cement blocks may be used
in accordance with Garfield County specifications.
Water: Water lines must be copper tubing of at least
diameter. Heat tapes must have thermostats (either built-in
or separate), and must be outside of skirting. Heat tape
shall extend from the trailer inlet to a point twelve (12)
inches below the surface of the soil or to a depth sufficient
to prevent freezing of the water line.
Sewer: Taped sewer fittings must be used to connect mobile
home drains to the park's sewer system. Long sewer lines
must be securely strapped to the frame of the mobile home.
Mobile homes with two widely separated exterior drains must
have rigid (cemented) sewer lines. All exposed sewer lines
must be covered with insulation satisfactory to the manage-
ment.
Any damage caused by improper connection with park facilities
will be the sole responsibility of the tenant. A statement
of charges for such damage will be presented by the management
and assessed with the next month's rent.
3 Mobile homes must be skirted in accordance with Garfield
County regulations. Mobile homes must be skirted within 30
days after entering the park. Exterior skirting panels should'
be of a weather resistant, fire resistant material. Skirting
1"
with a
bright surface such
as
must be painted an appropriate
painted condition. Corrugated
with corrugated ridges running
aluminum or galvanized metal
color and kept in a neatly
skirting panels must be installed
vertically. Skirting panels
must be neatly fitted and vented at the front and rear of
the mobile home. One access door in the skirting at least
4' wide must be in front of the wheels and one behind the
wheels.
4. Steps, porches, etc., must be well constructed, neat,
attractive, and painted an appropriate color, if applicable
5. Each mobile home must be kept clean and neat. Storage of
bottles, cans, boxes, refrigerators, washers, dryers or any
other equipment on the patio or carport is not permitted.
Neither is storage on tops of patios, awnings, storage sheds,
or mobile homes permitted.
6. No storage sheds, awnings, carports, fences or other exterior
structure may be built unless first approved in writing by the
park management; and if so approved, may not be removed with-
out written permission.
7. No hanging of clothes on patios or carports is permitted.
Only clothes lines approved by management will be permitted.
8. Mobile home parks, of necessity, contain extensive underground
facilities. Any digging must be approved by management, and a
sketch of the desired digging area must be submitted.
9. The park will be responsible for the maintenance of lawns,
trees and shrubs on all sites. However, tenants themselves must
maintain their rear spaces and should generally maintain their
entire spaces in a clean and orderly fashion and be prompt with
necessary care. The yard should not be dug up nor disturbed nor
should trees, shrubs or other plant material be removed without
the written permission of the management.
10. The management, with the cooperation of the tenants, assumes
responsibility for the total appearance of the Battlement Mesa
Mobile Home Park. In the event that a tenant repeatedly neglects
his space, he will receive written notice to vacate.
11. Tenants are responsible for the removal of snow on their space
and/or ice on driveways, patios and walks.
12. No tenants will be allowed to store any flammable materials
or house any pets under their respective mobile homes. All
spaces under the mobile homes should be generally kept clear
in case of emergency.
RULES GOVERNING AUTOMOBILES
1. Tenants and their visitors are requested to park cars in their
driveways or in the designated parking areas. Tenants must
insure that guests do not park in a way to block other driveways,
or use a neighbor's onstreet parking area, unless permission
has been received from the neighbor. A maximum of two vehicles
per space shall be allowed. Any additional vehicles owned by
tenants must be housed in adjoining commercial miniwarehouse
space if available. In any case, not in the mobile home park.
2. Vehicles are not to be driven or parked on grassy areas at
any time.
3. Speed limit in the park is 15mph. Extreme caution must be
observed for safety of children.
4. Cars and motorcycles with loud or disturbing exhausts are
prohibited. Unnecessary vehicle horn blowing is prohibited.
Motorcycles are to be used for transportation in and out of
the park only. Joy riding will not be permitted.
5. Cars will not be overhauled or placed on blocks or jacks in
the park. All cars in the park must be in running condition,
with current safety inspection stickers, and proper license
plates. Junk cars are not permitted and will be towed away
at owner's expense. Cars that drip oil or grease excessively
may not remain in the park in such condition.
6. Any acquisition or disposition of an automobile or any other
vehicle by a tenant must be reported to the management at
once. Current license numbers of all vehicles must be reported
to the management immediately.
7. Any trucks and/or vans larger than 3/4 ton may not be parked
at the mobile home site, or driven in the park, except for
business purposes only.
8. Bicycles are not to be ridden in the park after sundown or
within a half hour of sundown and all traffic signs must be
observed by bicycle riders.
9. Mini -bikes and off-road motorcycles are not to be ridden in
the park under any circumstances.
10. In order to assist in the movement of mobile homes onto and
off of spaces within the park, vehicles parked on adjacent
spaces which interfere with such movement must be relocated
to some other designated parking area. Those tenants who
would be affected will received a written notice 24 -hours
prior to any such move. Vehicles being so notified and not
removed will be subject to being towed away at the owner's
expense.
RULES GOVERNING FIREARMS
1. No firearms, BB guns, pellet guns or sling shots ore to
be used within the park under any circumstances. Any
violations will mean the automatic notification to vacate.
RULES GOVERNING ANIMALS AND PETS
1. No pets are allowed in the park without prior written authori-
zation from the management. A maximum of one cat or dog may
be allowed per family. No pet will be allowed which exceeds
fifteen (15) inches in height. An additional charge of $10.00
per month will be charged for any dog or cat permitted by
the management.
2. Pets must be kept on a leash at all times when outside, day
or night. if there are any complaints, repeated violations
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
of these rules, or contamination of yards and playgrounds,
tenants will be asked to remove the pet from the premises
or vacate.
3. Both cats and dogs must wear a collar or harness with an
identification tag and current Rabies tag attached at all
time when outside.
4. Any pet found loose in the park will be considered a stray
and will be impounded. The management may impound the pet
on the park premises or cause the pet to be picked up by
the animal pound, if available. Any subsequent charges
will be charged to the tenant.
5. Cats and dogs must not remain outside at night.
6. No breeding or raising of litters of pets is permitted.
Boarding of pets within the park is prohibited.
7. The pet of a visitor may not be brought into the park without
the prior written permission of the management. Any violation
of this restriction will be grounds for a notice to vacate.
8. Pets must not be penned within the skirting underneath the
mobile home. Pets, when outside, may not be permitted onto
other tenants' yards or common areas of the park.
9. Noisy pets will not be allowed to remain. Pets such as
rabbits, squirrels, raccoons, etc., are not permitted in
the park. Horses are not permitted in the park.
10 All mobile home spaces are to be kept clean from pet litter.
Such litter is to be wrapped and put in garbage cans or in
containers.
REFUSE DISPOSAL
1. Every tenant of the park has an interest in keeping his home
in the park clean and neat at all times. The proper
disposal of refuse and garbage is extremely important.
2. Trash will be picked up times a week.
3. Trash must be placed in the collection containers located
in the park. Trash must not be left in open sacks or boxes
for the wind or stray dogs and cats to scatter. All trash
must be placed in plastic bags prior to discarding in the
collection container.
4. Automobile or truck oil must not be poured or spilled on lawns,
cement, asphalt, gutters, or poured over fences surrounding
the park; but must be placed in a container, securely capped
and placed in collection containers. Used plastic bleach
bottles, thoroughly rinsed out, are excellent for disposing
of used motor oil.
5. Tenants are expected to keep their yards clear of windblown
trash.
6. Candy wrappers, cigarette packages, soft drink and beer cans,
etc., must not be carelessly tossed on lawns, streets,
sidewalks, etc., but must be placed in proper receptacles.
ENFORCEMENT OF BATTLEMENT MESA STANDARDS
A major consideration in selecting tenants for the park is whether
the prospective tenant is agreeable to following the standards of
the park and whether the tenant recognizes the rules and regulations
as being designed to ensure a pleasant, attractive and friendly
community in which to have his home.
Generally, your neighbors will appreciate your bringing to their
attention the violation, unknowingly, of a park rule, rather than
reporting such violations to the management. THEREFORE, IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT TENANTS ENDEAVOR TO ASSIST ONE ANOTHER IN COMPLYING
WITH THE PARK RULES, AND BRING VIOLATIONS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
MANAGEMENT ONLY AS A LAST RESORT.
Enforcement of the Rules and Regulations to maintain the standards
for the advantage of all residents is a major obligation of the
management. If an infraction of these Rules and Regulations occurs,
a notice of termination may be given. Ignorance of a rule cannot be
accepted as an excuse for its violations. The Rules and Regulations
are subject to change, and residents will be notified of any changes
through the mobile home park management.
Tenant hereby acknowledges that he/she has read these Rules and
Regulations and thereby agrees to abide by them and any other rules
posted by the Manager, as well as all Federal, State and Local laws.
It is agreed that violations hereof shall, at the election of the
Manager, terminate any tenancy.
DATE
PARK MANAGER
Geological Report Covering General Conditions and
Potential Problems. (Chen & Associates are providing
the necessary information coincident with plat design.)
PLEASE REFER TO REPORTS SUBMITTED
WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Soils Maps and Tables Based on National Cooperative
Soil Survey, USDA and Soil Conservation Service (a
map recently discovered in Old ARCO files is
believed to be adequate for this requirement.)
PLEASE REFER TO SOILS MAPS SUBMITTED
WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Vegetation Mao (same as for 8.)
PLEASE REFER TO VEGETATION
MAP SUBMITTED WITH P.U.D.
Wildlife Map or Report.
SEE ATTACHED LETTER
IMIIM
•MellMeleirl
.111,111
J i
Richard D. Lamm, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE
IJack R. Griot), Director
6060 Broadway
Denver. Colorado 80216 (825-1192)
I
711 Independent Avenue
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
f r \i
I I,' t 1 7 1980 )i
6tk. —__ SII
it:'itJ;,i ? CO. I r:„rh. ti”
.ct1-t
April 15, 1980
Ray Baldwin
Planning Director, Garfield County
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
RE: Battlement Mesa Planned Unit Development
Dear Mr. Baldwin:
The Colorado Division of Wildlife is responsible for welare of wildlife in
the State of Colorado and as such is opposed to land uses having adverse
impacts on wildlife. Our immediate concern relating to the proposed Bat-
tlement Mesa PUD is the immediate loss of big game winter range and possible
alteration of riparian habitat.
The Battlement Mesa PUD lies within critical deer winter range, (see attached
ii-ap) and receives consistent use as evidenced by our aerial trend counts.
(see attached table) .. In severe winters elk as well as deer depend upon the
vegetation found in the meadows and drainages for survival. The area south-
west of Monument Gulch is an exceptionally high use wintering area for deer
and supports a heavy concentration of these animals during most winters.
This area is also designated to support the highest density of people, i.e.
nobi.].ehame subdivision. Because of this high density this area will most
likely have the greatest impact, directly and indirectly, on the existing
deer and elk herds. The obvious impact will be the direct loss of big game
winter range and subsequent displacement of deer and elk due to the PUD.
Less obvious in the indirect loss of habitat in the area surrounding the
entire development due to increased human activities such as hiking, pic-
nicking, cross-country skiing, snc mobiling and dirt -biking. Dogs running
at large also pose a serious threat to wildlife. If uncontrolled these
activities often force deer, elk, and other wildlife into less desirable
or marginal habitat resulting in decreased populations.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Harris Sherman, Executive Director • WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Sam Caudill, Chairman
Michael Higbee, Vice Chairman • Jay K. Childress, Secretary • Jean K. Tool, Member • Vernon C. Williams, Member
Thomas Farley, Member • Roger Clark, Member • Wilbur Redden, Member
Ray Baldwin
Planning Director, Garfield County
April 15, 1980 •
Page Two
Preserving the integrity of the riparian zone along the Colorado River is a
second major concern. Riparian areas account for only 3 percent of Colorado's
land area but 90 percent of existing wildlife utilize this area at some time
during their life cycle. It is a very important and dynamic ecosystem for
many nongame wildlife species including the Bald Eagle. There is presently
a Bald Eagle communal roost site located along the river in Section 23, ad-
jacent to the proposed development. Upstream 11 miles from Grand Valley is
another communal roost site. (see map). Development or alteration of this
riparian zone could displace all but a few wildlife species indigenous to
this habitat.
Since a PUD the size of Battlement Mesa will have an affect on wildlife popu-
lations now and in the future, we ask that wildlife concerns be addressed.
To lessen the anticipated negative impacts on wildlife we would offer the
following suggestions.
1. Designate all drainages as open/green space. Native vegetation
should be left to provide wildlife habitat and prevent erosion.
2. Purchase or lease deer/elk winter range to offset winter range lost
to the proposed development on an acre for acre basis. Possible
areas could be Northeast of Battlement Mesa or Grand Valley.
3. habitat improvement of existing winter range near Battlement Mesa.
This could be accomplished by fertilization, chaining, brush beating,
etc.
4. Dedication of a conservation easement for the riparian zones north and
south of the Colorado River. A non -consumptive use area could be de-
veloped with assistance from the Division of Wildlife.
5. Fence construction should not exceed 42 inches in height with no more
than one kick wire to allow movement of deer/elk without injury.
Wooden fences are preferred.
6. Use of motorcycles, snow,rnbiles, all -terrain vehicles or other off-road
vehicles should be restricted to the immediate yard, driveway, estab-
lished roads and trails. No trails for motorized vehicles should be
constructed in the drainages or riparian zone. No new roads or trails
off site into deer/elk winter range should be constructed.
Ray Baldwin
Planning Director, Garfield County
April 15, 1980
Page Three
7. Dogs should not be allowed to run at large. Kennels should be used
and a strict leash law enforced. This will be extremely critical
in the mobi]home subdivision.
We feel that these suggestions can aid in reducing human - wildlife conflicts,
and in part compensate for the loss of wildlife habitat and displacement of
existing wildlife populations. Because Battlement Mesa will occupy known
deer/elk winter range, the presence of these animals is erriminent and any
damage resulting from their presence will be disclaimed by the Division
of Wildlife .
It is our desire to be of assistance to Battlement Mesa where wildlife con-
cerns are involved. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment on
this important Planned Unit Development. If we can be of further assistance
please feel free to contact us.
cc: B. Baker
J. Leslie
L. Green
F. Novak
Habitat File
MG:PDD:sw
;Sincerely
i
Z
erry D Olson
NW R-
onal Manager
DEER AND ELK AERIAL TREND COUJTS - BATTLEMENT MESA
*Aerial Trend Counts (Mule Deer) - Battlement Mesa
Year Number of Deer
1979 251
1977 220
1976 157
1975 116
1974 120
*Aerial Trend Counts (Elk) - Battlement Mesa
Year Number of Elk
1980 223
1979 154
1978 65
1977 30
1976 37
*Figures represent animals on the Northside of Battlement Mesa and adjoining
mcadcs•;s. Der counts were done during April and elk counts were done during
January of cited years.
Evidence That the Water Supply is of Sufficient Quality
and Quantity, Including a Master Distribution Plan.
SEE ATTACHED LETTER
COMPLETE ENGINEERING SERVICES
'IN THE SPECIALTY FIELDS OF
WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION
WATER AND SEWAGE TREATMENT
SEWAGE COLLECTION AND REUSE
STORM DRAINAGE
FIRE PROTECTION
IFLOOD CONTROL
OTHER WATER•ORIENTED PROJECTS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
WRIGHT-MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERS
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
2420 ALCOTT STREET
DENVER. COLORADO 90211
1303 ASS -6201
January 30, 1981
Re: Battlement Mesa Development
Garfield County, Colorado
RONALD C MCLAUGHLIN
KENNETH R WRIGHT
HALFORD E ERICKSON
DOUGLAS T SOVERN
WILLIAM C. TAGGART
DAVID J. LOVE
ROBERT L CARLEY
RONALD 9 CLONINGER
JAMES B FLOOD
JOHN T MCLANE
GENE A BURRELL
WILLIAM R KENDALL
MICHAEL E. MERCER
JOHN M. PFLAUM
JIMMIE D WHITFIELD
ROBERT A FERGUSON
J HAROLD ROBERTS
JACK W STEINMEYER
LEANDER L URMY
To whom it may concern:
Water for the Battlement Mesa Development will be supplied initially from a
wellfield with chlorination facilities provided at a booster pump station.
This system design and source has been approved by the State Health Depart-
ment. There will be enough water available April 1, 1981 for 535 lots.
Future wells will be added as necessary to bring the capacity up to 1450
lots.
Construction of the final Water Treatment Plant will start about April 1,
1981. This plant is designed with an ultimate capacity of 13 MGD which will
serve the entire Development of 7100 dwelling units. The first phase of the
plant will be 6.5 MGD. The plant should be on line for operation by Spring
of 1982.
Sewage treatment will be provided by an Interim Sewage Treatment Plant which
will be completed by mid-February 1981. The initial capacity is for 2000
population equivalent (approximately 715 equivalent lots). This system has
been approved by the State and the required permits have been obtained.
On June 1, 1981 bids will be received for the final Sewage Treatment Plant.
Within six months after the start of construction, the final Plant will be
able to supplement the Interim Plant to give the system increased capacity.
Six months later, when construction of the final Sewage Treatment Plant is
completed, it will handle the 7100 units planned for the Development (approxi-
mately 20,000 population) plus excess capacity so that it can be used as a
Regional Plant to serve a total population of 48,000 people.
If you require any additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
DJL:mee
BRANCH OFFICES
ASPEN
0139 VENTNOR AVENUE
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
DILLON LAKE
DRAWER 8
FRISCO. COLORADO 80443
WRIGHT-McLAUGHLIN ENGINEERS
GLENWOOD SPRINGS
P. 0 BOX 219
GLENWOOD SPRINGS.
COLORADO 81601
STEAMBOAT SPRINGS
P. 0 BOX 5220
STEAMBOAT VILLAGE.
COLORADO 80499
CHEYENNE
3130 HENDERSON DRIVE
CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82001
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 5
STATE OF COLORADO
Application No. 79CW350, an
79CW351
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
FOR WATER RIGHTS OF
BATTLEMENT MESA, INC., )
IN THE COLORADO RIVER
IN GARFIELD COUNTY
1. An Application for Change of Water Rights was filed by
Battlement Mesa, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( hereinafter
"Applicant"), on December 28, 1979. This Application is denominated
Case No. 79CW350.
2. An Amendment to this Application was filed on February 29,
FILED
IN WATER COURT
Diviaion No. 5
ry X311981
STATE DF. -COLORADO
r./ /){.WATE11 CLERK
eT DE►U7�
RULING OF REFEREE
1980.
3. Timely and adequate notice of the pendency of Case No.
79CW350, as amended, has been given in the manner required by law.
4. Timely Statements of Opposition were filed in Case No.
79CW350 by the City and County of Denver acting by and through its
Board of Water Commissioners ("Denver") and the Town of Grand Valley
(which since that filing has chggged its name to the Town of
Parachute). Denver and Parachute have consented to entry of this
Decree as evidenced by stipulation of their counse1.4210100a.
5. The period for filing Statements of Opposition in Case No.
79CW350, as amended, expired on April 30, 1980. There have been no
other entries of appearance filed in Case No. 79CW350.
6. An Application for Approval of Plan for Augmentation was
filed by the Applicant on December 28, 1979. This Application is
denominated Case No. 79CW351. An Amendment thereto was filed on
February 29, 1980.
7. Timely and adequate notice of the pendency of Case No.
79CW351, as amended, has been given in the manner required by law.
8. Timely Statements of Opposition in Case No. 79CW351 were
filed by Denver and Parachute. Denver and Parachute have consented
-1-
79CW350, and
79CW351
to entry of this Decree as evidenced by signature of their counsel.
OOMENEW
9. The time for filing Statements of Opposition in Case No.
79CW351 as amended expired on April 30, 1980. There have been no
other entries of appearance filed in Case No. 79CW351.
10. Upon motion of Applicant made at the pre-trial conference
held herein on May 26, 1980, Case No. 79CW350 and 79CW351 were
consolidated for all purposes by order of the Court.
A. Change of Conditional Water Right.
11. Applicant has acquired twenty (20) c.f.s. of the water
right decreed to the Dow Pumping Plant and Pipeline. By decree dated
November 10, 1966, the District Court in and for Garfield County, in
Civil Action No. 4914, for Former Water District 39, conditionally
awarded said Dow Pumping Plant and Pipeline priority number 319 in
said water district 39 for the following puposes: industrial, mining,
retorting, refining, power, domestic, and all other uses necessary
and related to the production of shale oil and its by-products.
Said priority was conditionally decreed with an appropriation
date of January 24, 1955, for 178 c.f.s. of water.
The point of diversion as originally decreed is on the
Northerly bank of the Colorado River at a point whence the East
quarter corner of Section 6, Township 7 South, Range 95 West, of
the 6th P.M. bears North 13017' East 753 feet.
By decree dated January 27, 1977, in Case No. W-2786, the
District Court in and for Water Division No. 5, authorized a change
in conditional water right to an alternate point of diversion located
"In the Northerly Bank of the Colorado River at a point whence the
P.ast quarter corner of Section 6, Township 7 South, Range 95 West, of
the 6th P.M. bears North 35°00' East 1880 feet.
12. By this application Battlement Mesa, Inc. seeks the
following changes with respect to the subject 20 c.f.s.:
(a) A further alternate point of diversion for 20 c.f.s.
at a point in the channel of the Colorado River whence the Northwest
-2-
79CW350, and
79CW351
Corner of Section 7, Township 7 South, Range 95 West of the 6th P.M.,
bears North 460 West a distance of 3300 feet.
(b) A further alternate point of diversion for said
20 c.f.s. at a point in the main channel of the Colorado River in
Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 96 West, of the 6th P.M., as
follows: The point of diversion lies within a 100 foot radius whose
center bears North 8036' West 861 feet from the Brass Cap Monument
corner of the Northeast quarter MMOIng
of said
marking the Southeast
Section 13. The East line of said Northeast 1/4 is assumed to bear
North 0000' East.
(c) A confirmation by decree of a change of use of a
water right whereby the water the subject of this
may be used for municipal, domestic, industrial,
irrigation, sewage treatment and other beneficial uses
conditional
application
commercial,
in connection with the new community to be constructed on lands
generally within the Battlement Mesa Planned Unit Development. Said
lands are located in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18, and 19,
Township 7 South, Range 95 West, and Sections 13 and 24, Township
7 South, Range 96 West, of the 6th P.M., County of Garfield.
13. The source of supply for the subject water right is the
Colorado River.
14. By terms of the instrument whereby Battlement Mesa, Inc.
derives title to the subject 20 c.f.s. of the Dow Pumping Plant and
Pipeline, Battelment Mesa, Inc.'s interest therein is subordinate in
178 c.f.s. decreed to said structure.
,)riority to the balance of the
The effect of this conveyence was to sever into two distinct
priorities the Dow Pumping Plant and Pipeline. The subject matter
of this application is the subordinate, or most junior 20 c.f.s.
decreed to said structure. Nothing herein affects the 158 c.f.s.
not the subject of this conveyance.
15. The changes in water rights requested are essentially
movement of points
of diversion realtively short distances downstream,
and while additional purposes are sought, the nature of use of the wate
right as originally decreed in Civil Action 4914 and as decreed in
-3-
79CW350, and
79CW351
Case W-2786 contemplate a level of consumptive use that preclude
any notion that any greater draft on the stream will occur by reason
of the change, or that returns to the stream, if any, at the points
previously decreed would have satisfied intervening headgates of
other appropriators, if any. Accordingly, injury to the rights
of other appropriators will not be present under the requested
changes in water rights.
B. Augmentation Plan.
16. In its augmentation plan, Applicant seeks the right to make
otherwise out -of -priority diversions in an amount up to 6 c.f.s. at
the three alternate points of diversion described in paragraphs 11 and
12 above, hereafter referred to as•the "Intake Facilities", provided
that it crakes contemporaneous replacement of depletions from the
water so diverted out -of -priority from the following sources of
supply:
(a) Up to 200 acre feet of water annually from Wildcat
Reservoir, as conditionally decreed by the District Court in and for
Water Division 5, by decree of May 27, 1971, with appropriation date
of September 28, 1968. Applicant has leased said water right, and
the entitlement to its use is limited by the term of the lease therefor.
(b) Water released from Ruedi Reservoir pursuant to a contract
being sought from the United States Water and Pober Service and/or
its delegate. Ruedi Reservoir is located in Eagle and Pitkin Counties,
Colorado and derives its water supply from the Fryingpan River.
conditional decree dated June 20, 1958, in Civil Action No. 4613,
the District Court in and for Garfield County awarded said reservoir
Priority No. 718, with appropriation date of July 29, 1957. By
subsequent order of the District Court in and for Water Division
By
No: 5 in Case W-789-76 that reservoir's conditional decree has been
fixed at 102,369
(c) Water
a contract being
a.f.
released from Green Mountain Reservoir, pursuant to
sought from the United States Water and Power Service
and/or its delegate. Green Mountain Reservoir is located in Summit
County, Colorado, and derives its water supply from the Blue River.
-4-
79CW350, and
79CW351
By decree dated October 12, 1955, in Consolidated Cases (Civil)
Nos. 2782, 5016, and 5017, the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado awarded said reservoir a priority for 154,645
a.f., with a right to refill of 6,316 a.f., with appropriation date
of August 1, 1935.
(d) Mesa Lakes No.s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, as applied for
in Case No. 79CW349, as decreed by District Court in and for Water
Division No. 5. Said application awards conditional water rights for
storage of a total of 103.7 a.f. of water for the eight lakes. These
structures have not yet been constructed.
(e) Monument Reservoir No. 3, as conditionally decreed by the
District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 in Case No. W-2013 by
decree dated March 15, 1974, with appropriation date of July 24, 1973.
Said decree awarded Monument Reservoir No. 3 a conditional water
right for 500 acre feet of water. Said reservoir is entitled to be
supplied from Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch. It is also entitled
to be supplied from the Huntley Ditch -Monument Reservoir Enlargement,
as conditionally decreed by the District Court in and for Water
Division No. 5 by decree in Case No. W-2012, dated March 15, 1974,
with appropriation date of July 24, 1973. The Huntley Ditch -
Monument Reservoir Enlargement derives its dupply fromBattlement
Creek. This structure has not yet been constructed.
(f) Deep Creek Reservoir, as conditionally decreed by the
District Court in and for Water Division No. 5 in Case No. W-322 by
decree dated August 23, 1972, with appropriation date of December 12,
1966. Said decree awards Deep Creek Reservoir a conditional water
right for 14,557 a.f. of water, supplied by Deep Creek, a tributary
of the Colorado River. This structure has not yet been constructed.
(g) Thompson Creek Reservoir, as conditionally decreed by the
District Court in and for Garfield County in Civil Action No. 5884,
by decree dated November 5, 1971, with appropriation date of December
17, 1966. Said decree awards Thompson Creek Reservoir a conditional
water right for 23,893 a.f. of water. This structure has not yet been.
constructed.
79CW350, and
79CW351
17. With respect to utilization of water from any of the
facilities identified in paragraph 16(d), (e), (f) and (g) and (g)
the operation of this plan for augmentation is dependent upon actual
construction of said facilities. With respect to utilization of water
from any of the facilities identified in paragraph 16(b) and (c), the
operation of this plan for augmentation is dependent upon perfection
of Applicant's right, by contract or otherwise, to make use of such
water.
18. Battlement Mesa, Inc. is engaged in the development of the
new community of Battlement Mesa, to be located on the South side of
the Colorado River near the Town of Parachute. The lands to be
developed for the community include generally those lands within the
Battlement Mesa Planned Unit Development approved by the Board of
Commissioners of Garfield County. Said lands are located in Sections
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18, and 19, Township 7 South, Range 95 West,
and Sections 13 and 24, Township 7 South, Range 96 West, of the 6th
P.M., County of Garfield, State of Colorado.
19. The community will be provided with a centralized water and
sewer system. Upon formation of a municipal or quasi -municipal
corporation to provide such services, the rights and obligations
accruing under this plan may pass to such an entity. Notice of any
transfer or assignment shall be afforded to Denver and Parachute.
20. By diversions through the Intake Facilities under the priority
Tor the Dow Pumping Plant and Pipeline, the water requirements for the
community will be satisfied. At such times as the Applicant's water
requirements cannot be filled under that priority, Battlement Mesa,
Inc. will make out -of -priority diversions up to the amount of
6 c•.f.s. via the Intake Facilities only when and only to the extent
that a supply of augmentation water is furnished to the Colorado
River in satisfaction of senior priorities. The supply will replace
depeletions to the Colorado River occasioned by Battlement Mesa, Inc.'
use of water out -of -priority.
-6-
79CW350, and
79CW351
21. Depletions resulting from diversions and use of water in
the community consist of the water actually consumed in the course
of operating the centralized water and sewer system for municipal,
domestic, industrial, commercial, irrigation, sewage treatment, and
all other beneficial uses occurring under the system. This depletion
will be measured as the difference between raw water diversions from
the Colorado River via the Intake Facilities and return flows
discharged to the Colorado River after community use. Return flows
shall include metered discharges of the community's treated wastewater
facility, or a facility which by contract provides such treatment
and metering of discharges, and irrigation return flows from lawn,
gardens, parklands, and golf courses.
22. In calculating required replacements of depletions, under
this plan for augmentation the following formula shall be used:
D=Q-P-.2(Qm-1-HUm-1)
Where:
D equals depletion of water to Colorado River on any
given day
Q equals rate of diversion in acre feet per day at intake
facilities
P equals discharge in acre feet per day from the wastewater
treatment plant
HU equals the acre-feet of water delivered to residences,
office buildings, schools, and other structures for internal
domestic and sanitary purposes, which, for purposes of this
plan, is calculated as equalling measured discharge of the
waste water treatment plant divided by 0.95.
Qm-1 equals the average daily rate of diversion in acre
feet per day at the Intake Facilities one month prior to
the datefor which the formula is being applied. Imposition
of this delay factor is designed to account for the lag time
from application of water until its return to the stream.
HUm -1 equals the average daily delivery of water, in acre
-7-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
79CW350, and
79CW351
feet, of water delivered to residences, offices, buildings,
schools, and other structures for internal domestic and
sanitary purposes which is calculated in the same way as
provided above for HU but for one month prior to the date
for which the formula is being applied.
0.20 equals the increment of applied irrigation water which
returns to the Colorado River by ground water percolation or
tailwater. It represents the application of irrigation
water over and above evapo-transpiration.
23. The Plan for Augmentation herrn decreed shall entitle
Applicant to no more than instantaneous rate of flow of six c.f.s.
at such times as Applicant makes out -of -priority diversions replaced
from the sources of supply above identified.
24. Since the operation of the plan depends on a contemporaneous
replacement of water to satisfy the actual depletions occasioned by
any out -of -priority diversion, the Court finds that the Colorado
River will be made whole at every phase of develpment of the community,
and that no injury to the water rights of others will be caused by
operation of the plan in accordance with this decree, provided,
however, that this finding shall not limit the Court in making any
subsequent revisions pursuant to paragraphs 28 and 29 below.
25. On any day that a valid call upon Applicant's interest in
the Dow Pumping Plant and Pipeline exists on the Colorado River, as
determined by the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5, the
Applicant as a condition of this Decree shall cause there to be made
available to the Colorado River a full replacement of depletions
,,ssociated with any out -of -priority diversions for the community's
,icipal water system. Applicant shall be entitled to make such
out -of -priority diversions only when the sources of augmentation
water identified above are released to the Colorado River system in
satisfaction of depletions determined in accordance with this plan.
26. Releases of reservoir water for augmentation purposes
shall be measured and subject to the appropriate stream carriage
charges which the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 5 may be
required by law to establish from time to time. The augmentation
-8-
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
79CW350, and
79CW351
water shall be released at the direction of the Division Engineer
for Water Division No. 5 so that such releases can be effected in
the most practicable way to fulfill the purposes of this plan.
27. In order to assure that the vested rights of others are
protected from injury and to assure proper administration of this
decree, Applicant shall, at a minimum, provide the following
information to the Division Engineer by a weekly accounting:
(i) the daily amount of water diverted at the alternate
points of deversion for direct use by Applicant;
(ii) a
paragraph 22
(iii)
daily calculation of depletions
above;
the daily
amount
of
water
in accordance
with
released from reservoirs to
replace depletions.
Applicant, upon written request, will provide Objectors with copies
thereof, provided that the requesting Objector shall reimburse
Appliant for any copying and mailing costs reasonably incurred.
28. In order to assure that the vested rights of others are not
injured by implementation of this plan for augmentation, the Court
retains jurisdiction in this matter and upon proper petition by a
party hereto, the Court will reconsider its approval of the plan for
augmentation. In the event the Applicant or any Objector petitions the
Court for reconsideration on any of the elements of the plan, the
Court shall order appropriate notice to be given to all the parties
hereto. Such petition shall be made in good faith, under oath, and
shall set forth with particularity the factual basis upon which the
requested reconsideration is premised, together with proposed decretal
1 ^guage to effect the petition. The party lodging the petition shall
have the burden of going forward to establish the prima facie facts
alleged in the petition. If the Court finds those facts to be
established, the Applicant shall therupon bear the burden of proof to
show (a) that any modification sought by Applicant will avoid injury to
other appropriators, or (b) that modification sought by Objectors is
not required to avoid injury to other appropriators, or (c) that any
term or condition proposed by Applicant in response to the petition doef
-9-
79CW350, and
7907351
avoid injury to other appropriators.
29. The Court determines that a period of three years operating
experience under the plan will suffice to determine whether injury is
in fact precluded or needs to be further remedied. The three-year
period of retained jurisdiction shall begin to run on the date of the
first utilization by Applicant of replacement waters to augment the
stream for depletions caused by otherwise out -of -priority diversions.
Written notice of the commencement of the three-year
timely be provided by Applicant to the Court and the Objectors.
no petition for reconsideration is filed within three years from the
date of such notice, the retention of jurisdiction for this purpose
shall automatically expire.
29. This decree shall not be construed
period shall
If
to allow reuse, recycling,
or successive use of water diverted under the priority for the
20 c.f.s. of the pow Pumping Plant and Pipeline, which is the subject
of Case 79CW350 for the purposes allowed herein.
The Referee does therefore conclude that the above entitled
application for change of water right (79CW350), and application for
approval of plan for augmentation (79CW351), should be and hereby are
approved, and the Intake Facilities may be operated in accordance
with this Decree, without curtailment for the benefit of more senior
priorities, so long as this plan for augmentation is being operated
in accordance with this decree.
It is accordingly ORDERED that this ruling shall be filed with
the Water Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing, subject
to Judicial review pursuant to Section 37-92-304 C.R.S. 1973.
It is further ORDERED that a copy of this ruling shall be filed
with the appropriate Division Engineer and the State Engineer.
-10-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
79CW350, and
79CW351
Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, this
.3/3t day of / =zerA-re .,e , 1914").
HY THE REFEREE:
W` Referee
Wa er Division No. 5
State of Colorado
No protest was filed in this matter, and accordingly the foregoing
ruling is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgement and
Decree of this court; provided, however, that the approval of this
plan for augmentation shall be subject to reconsideration by the
Water Judge on the question of injury to the vested rights of others
in accordance with paragraphs 28 and 29 above.
1,1,7 E: To b< S,1✓,d .�.�7z
onJ fL ' 2.o�19t�� �.« w„7�ICC/cA.Ar
Dated
-11-
Water Judge
Describe the Legal Entity that Will Own and Operate
the Water System Including Method of Financing.
THE SYSTEM WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND FINANCED
BY BATTLEMENT MESA, INCORPORATED
Evidence of Adequate Sewer Facilities
SEE ATTACHED LETTER
CO��LIT( [NGiN((RiNG S(RVICES
IN THE SPECIALTY FIELDS Of
SU►►LT AND DISTRIBUTIONATER AND SE w*OE TREATMENT
'ATE*
wAGE COLLECTION AND REUSE
TO*M DRAINAGE
FIRE PROTECTION
FLOOD CONTROL
'THIN WATER•ORIENTEO PROJECTS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I�Iv l I I I L/\l h tL11V tiv Ilr LtttJ
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
3230 ALCOTT STREET
DENVER COLORADO 00311
1303, ASS-S2O1
Re: Battlement Mesa Development
Garfield County, Colorado
January 30, 1981
RONALD c H<LALGHLIN
KENNETH R WRIGHT
HALFORD E ERICKSON
DOUGLAS T SOVERN
WILLIAM C TAGGART
DAVID J LOVE
ROSERT L CAPLET
RONALD • CLONINGER
JAMES • FLOOD
JOHN T MCLANE
GENE A •URRELL
WILLIAM R KENDALL
MICHAEL E. MERCER
JOHN M. PFLAUM
JIMMIE D WHITFIELD
ROBERT A FEROUSON
J HAROLD ROBE.RTI
JACK W STEINMEYER
LEANDLR L URNY
To whom it may concern:
Water for the Battlement Mesa Development will be supplied initially from a
wellfield with chlorination facilities provided at a booster pump station.
This system design and source has been approved by the State Health Depart-
ment. There will be enough water available April 1, 1981 for 535 lots.
Future wells will be added as necessary to bring the capacity up to 1450
lots.
Construction of the final Water Treatment Plant will start about April 1,
1981. This plant is designed with an ultimate capacity of 13 MGD which will
serve the entire Development of 7100 dwelling units. The first phase of the
plant will be 6.5 MGD. The plant should be on line for operation by Spring
of 1982.
Sewage treatment will be provided by an Interim Sewage Treatment Plant which
will be completed by mid-February 1981. The initial capacity is for 2000
population equivalent (approximately 715 equivalent lots). This system has
been approved by the State and the required permits have been obtained.
On June 1, 1981 bids will be received for the final Sewage Treatment Plant.
Within six months after the start of construction, the final Plant will be
able to supplement the Interim Plant to give the system increased capacity.
Six months later, when construction of the final Sewage Treatment Plant is
completed, it will handle the 7100 units planned for the Development (approxi-
mately 20,000 population) plus excess capacity so that it can be used as a
Regional Plant to serve a total population of 48,000 people.
If you require any additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
WRIGHT-McLAUGHLIN ENGINEERS
DJL:mee
OFIANCH OFFICES GLENWOOD SPRINGS STEAMBOAT SPRINGS
ASPEN DILLON LAKE P 0 BOX 219 P 0 BOX 5220 CHEYENNE
0139 VENTNOR AVENUE DRAWER B GLENWOOD SPRINGS, STEAMBOAT VILLAGE. 3130 HENDERSON DRIVE
N. COLORADO 81611 PRISCO. COLORADO 80443 COLORADO 81601 COLORADO 80499 CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82001
Committment By the Electrical Power Distributor
SEE ATTACHED MASTER PLAN
Committment By the Gas Company
SEE ATTACHED LETTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ublic Service Company °I? CORDMORED
P.O. Box 152 Rifle, Co 81650
January 28, 1981 U
Battlement Mesa, Inc.
Box 308
Grand Junction , Co 81502
Attn: Mr. Stewart Gibbons
Operations Manager
Dear Mr. Gibbons:
JigIEW
/ N 3 0 1381
B M I.
This letter is to inform all those concerned Public Service Co.
of Colorado will provide natural gas service to Battlement
Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado.
Service will be provided in accordance with the extension policy
currently on file with the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of Colorado.
If I may be of further assistance, please contact me.
DLC:lu
Cor.'.11y,
Donald L. Currie
Sr. Consumer Service Rep.
Archaeology Clearance
SEE REPORT SUBMITTED
LABORATORY OF PUBLIC ARCHAEOLOGY
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
DR. CALVIN JENNINGS
DECEMBER, 1974
Radiological Report.
NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS SUBDIVISION
RE: GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
School District Agreement
TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL PLAT
Fire District Agreement
TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL PLAT
Police (or Sherrif) Agreement
TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL PLAT
DRAINAGE STUDY
MOBILE HOME PARK
FILING #2
BATTLEMENT MESA, INC.
GAI #1631.040
February 1981
Prepared for
Battlement Mesa, Inc.
Prepared by
Gingery Associates, Inc.
1310 Ute Avenue
Grand Junction, CO. 81501
BATTLEMENT MESA DEVELOPMENT
DRAINAGE STUDY
Introduction
The Battlement Mesa Development project area is located southeast
of Parachute, Colorado on a plateau situated easterly of the Colo-
rado River. This study is prepared to identify possible drainage
problems along proposed Stone Quarry Road and Tamarisk Trail and
for the proposed development in the area. These areas are identi-
fied on Sheet #1.
The Battlement Mesa study area is skirted by the Colorado River
on the west, Battlement Creek on the east and Dry Gulch on the
south. Monument Gulch flows through the area near the south end.
The entire site is drained by numerous small, indefinite drainage -
ways across the majority of the plateau area.
Gingery Assoiciates, Inc. completed the Battlement Mesa Storm
Drainage Analysis study in March, 1975 (Reference 1). Where
applicable, the information generated during that study has been
used in this report.
1
ILI. Drainage Crossing Stone Quarry Road and Tamarisk Trail
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Current drainage planning associated with Stone Quarry Road and
Tamarisk Trail calls for the preliminary design of culverts
needed to pass through the 100 -year frequency flood flows gener-
ated under the developed watershed conditions. These discharges
were developed in an earlier study cited in Reference 1. ,Several
reservoirs proposed as
a part of the drainage plan in the original
study are not included here.
to elimination of reservoirs
discharges.
The increase in flows resulting due
is reflected in the newly calculated
The hydrologic method used for the
graph Procedure (CUHP) as outlined
Criteria Manual (Reference 2).
study is Colorado Unit Hydro -
in the Urban Storm Drainage
The rainfall intensity duration
frequency charts used in Reference
for easy reference. Analysis used
1 are reproduced in Figure 1
an infiltration rate of 0.5"
per hour and a previous area retention depth of 0.5".
The basin outlines, drainage area
flood flows are shown on Sheet 1.
and drainageway locations should
future platting
process.
and the 100 -year frequency
These drainage basin boundaries
become an integral part of the
1
1
1
1
1
Culvert sizes shown on the Preliminary Drainage Study map (Sheet
1) are approximate and should be verified at the time of final
design. The sizes have been estimated for passing the 100 -year
flood with a ratio of the headwater depth to culvert size of
1.0 to 1.5.
�I. Drainage Design for Platted Areas
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
The preliminary drainage design of the platted area is also covered
in this study. The general location of this area is shown on Sheet
1. The necessary drainage features related to this area is also
given on Sheet 1.
In general, the drainage criteria used in the Regional Council
of Governments' "Urban Drainage and Flood Control Manual for
Denver, Colorado" (Reference 2) were followed with such modifi-
cations as were deemed necessary and appropriate. Since this
study area is small, the Rational Formula was used to calculate
all flows. Intensity -duration -frequency curves, as shown in the
Appendix (Figure 1) were used from Reference 1. "C" factors
used range from 0.40 to 0.50 depending on the proposed land use
in each sub -basin. The "C" factors for sub -basins with multiple
land uses were adjusted according to the percent of each type as
follows:
Land Use
Open Space
Mobile Home Park
Pavement
"C" Factor
0.20
0.45 to 0.5
0.80
The runoff capacity for the streets is based upon the curve
given in Figure 2 marked as "4 -inches curb -local street"., To
check against
streets based
street" given
is calculated
flow velocity.
the 100 -year flood flow carrying capacity of the
upon the FHA criteria, the curve for "local
in Figure 3 is used. The time of concentration
based upon the length of flow path divided by the
The drainage system
for the mobile home development
to handle 5 -year frequency flood flows.
Conclusions
is designed
This report and the attached calculations, charts and drawings
show the drainage situation and the solution to the drainage pro-
blems as encountered for Stone
the proposed subdivision.
Quarry Road and Tamarisk
The drainageways under Stone
Trail and
Quarry
Road and Tamarisk Trail are designed to pass the 100 -year flood
flows that will be generated from the developed watershed.. The
Mobile Home Park is designed to conveniently drain the area for
the 5 -year flood flows.
It is expected that during final design, modifications of many
of these proposed facilities will be necessary due to the final
layouts being established at that time. However, the general
plan presented here will be followed.
A. L. Robinson P. E. #6827
Cheif Engineer
References
1. Gingery Associates, Inc., Battlement Mesa Development Storm
Drainage and Flood Plain Study", March, 1975.
2. Denver Regional Council of Governments, "Urban Storm Drain-
age Criteria Manual", March, 1969.
4
1
BATTLEMENT MESA
RAINFALL
INTENSITY- DURATION - FREQUENCY
2 r,
FIGURE:. /
4"
5r)
Fn
I M N M N 111111 111111 11111 E EN MO N OM E 1111 1 MI
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN DATA
Location
of
Design Point
9
N
`
N
m
Length
f t. 11
o
E
►-
—
er G
.6 E
Flow Time
Time of
Concentration
min.
Coef ficient
c`
N`5 2—
_
c-
.
o o
m'
.4 a
Direct
Runof f
c f s
_
.- o
L C M
D cc o
Summation
Runoff cfs
Street
Pipe
Street
Pipe
-
I^ •'•.- Storvw
Remarks
Street
min.
m
d •_G
0 E
• m
0
o
Allowable
Capacity
cfs
m
O
cn o
N
co .0
Capacity
c fs 1
N N
O o
«
O N
> .a.
'P M
p o
D••
O«
-,.°
>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
A
/
/zoo
90•
7. f,,,
a
o f
• �,,_
// S
/,S
3,
/4
Z-
_.
'.J
4
l.a1
3 •,
2
J.,/
A
3
V75
..:./
V
•
2.S v,
^.S
.-o.-.1
a
,
YSo
v
Z,;.
..`:.1��
IS
s
300
/
.,t
)..z
3
yQ
V.,
(...
5.To
u
u
7.1
3
4., 4/
SSU,
_.
S, S
IS14.,
3
,?
7.5 o
_.
v
.7
S. 9
7
vv
-•J
v '
_, 4
S.3
/•S
. ,
/'-
:., 2 5
tJ. s
.'
r
9.1
_
/ J U
-
//
c',-,,
S.,'
11
.,,V
7•'i
•
u .'
/3
YS?..)
3.5
u
?•,\ 1
:.v
T-,
/t/
•7uo
5.0
4
-.
,/
-
_,3
»`,
1Zoo
?.1
-.V
14'J
.. ,
//./
Z
= /
•
..so
`7.v
v
).l,-
9,Z
3
_:/
_J
',34)
S0
n.Y
u.o-'.,
L7
I.5
3o
'//.
r/
...0
7.7_
,.V
1,-7
.
n.V
s
F
'"
5,7
,.v
-,,75
/ •.3
1..
3v
'',/.`/
/`l
/VI 4: dodthie
Location
of
Design Point
N
`-
°
m
•«
o
Y
J
Inlet Time
min.
Flow Time
Time of
Concentration
min.
Coef ficient
TL
_
`
N[,`
C!
-
A reo
A acre
Direct
Runof f
cfs
o o
s C N
occu
o u
o w
E a
E c
v) cc
Street
Pipe
Street
Pipe
Spr :,tor'_,
Remarks
o
^ 0
E
o •
o. o
a E
m
o
�"
a —
°
_ 0. N
a8;
m
O
rn o
N
.,7) .6
_
p N
U u
o
TN N
€ i>
o.
>w
0.
•,T., M
p u
Velocity
f ps
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
/
/.
7.1"
,/
1, ,.
•
;'
7.3
.,
2.'1
4,i
' ..-1
{
?.5
-
1•,I
,.._1
3.,
...
2
L
y .
L
u•7:
3.q
i
,.c
.3
3
,
3,p,
• '7:
3
3 S
1.c8
3 f 5
U T
' J
5
3
S,e
`-
..T
7_-rl
7 o
,C
(.?.
u-4
S.3
3.13
,,.
t =
c
r.
.-.
z
'
"
5.'-1
.),L/
3.S
3. t.14
",)
--
J .}1
>
.',1-f
. , S
� -1
! s u
5 L,
, . if
...
... C:
,� .
r
-
..l
-,
2-
2y
,'/2u,.
:• I
1 ,
2:5 .
s.v
c
.s
, .
z
f
)9
F,; .
<•,
,,y
.
4,,,2.
'.,
3
r
74)
1;L
".J
0,y
S!-
..• c
3Y
-
loon
7.2
0.,/
3.Z
9.27
n ,�
3•
2-1....
9,,-,
f".7
1y
',y
C:;, Y
z,
> Y
- 13
/7.3
7/s
/5
/r
-
r
�
3L
• •
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
AND
SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
MOBILE HOME PARK NO. 2
FOR
BATTLEMENT MESA, INCORPORATED
AT
BATTLEMENT MESA
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PREPARED BY
GINGERY ASSOCIATES, INC.
1310 UTE AVE.
GRAND JUNCTION, CO. 81501
245-0627
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE A
STREETS AND DRAINAGE
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1.. Clear and Grub $ Four
Thousand Dollars Lump Sum
LS
2. Top Soil Removal $ Twenty-one
Cents per Square Yard
4,000.00 4,000.00
113,000 SY 0.21 23,730.00
3. Top Soil Replacement $Twenty
Seven Cents per Square Yard
42,280 SY 0.27 11,415.60
4. Roadway Excavation $ One Dol-
lar and Fifty Cents per Cubic
Yard 60.000 CY 1.50 90,000.00
5. Embankment $ Thirty -One Cents
per Cubic Yard
6. Subgrade Preparation $ Sixty
Cents per Square Yard
7. Aggregate Base Course $ Two
Dollars and Eighty -Five Cents
per Square Yard
45,000 CY 0.31 13,950.00
75,000 SY 0,60 45,000.00
75,000 SY 2.85 213,750.00
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE A
STREETS AND DRAINAGE
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
8. 2" Asphaltic Surface $ Three
Dollars and Sixty -Five Cents
per Square Yard
9. 4" Roll Curb and Gutter $ Six
Dollars and Ten Cents per
Linear Foot
68,000 SY 3.65 248,200.00
44,000 LF 6.10 268,400.00
10. Asphalt Parking Pads $ Five
Dollars and Eighty Cents per
Square Yard 17,200 SY 5:80 99,760.00
11. Surface Drainage Structure $_
Eighteen Dollars and Fifty
Cents per Square Yard
12. Connections to Existing Pave-
ment $ One Hundred Dollars
75 SY 18,50 1,387.00
per Unit 6 EA 100.00 600.00
13. Single Drop Inlet $ Seven
Hundred and Seventy Dollars
per Unit
14. Double Drop Inlet $ One Thou-
sand, Five Hundred Dollars
per Unit
1
EA 770,00 770.00
4 EA 1,500,00 6,000.00
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE A
STREETS AND DRAINAGE
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
15. 36 RCP Storm Drain _$ Sixty -
Eight Dollars per Linear Foot
350 LF 68.00 23,800.00
16. 24 RCP Storm Drain $ Thirty -
Six Dollars per Linear Foot
410 LF 36.00 14,760.00
17. Triple Pipe Inlet Structure $
Five Thousand Dollars per
Unit 1 EA 520QQ,Q0 52000.00
18. Triple Pipe Outlet Structure
$ Four Thousand Dollars per
Unit
1
EA 41000.00 4,000.00
19. Single Pipe Outlet Structure
$ Three Thousand Dollars per
Unit 4 EA 3,000.00 12,000,00
20. Drainage Structures (Swale) $
Four Dollars and 40 Cents per
Linear Foot 4020 LF 4.40 17,688.00
21. Adjust •Manholes to Grade Up
$ Two Hundred and Fifty Dol-
lars per Unit 13 EA 250.00 3,250.00
22. Adjust Manholes to Grade
Down $ Three Hundred and
Fifty Dollars per Unit
12 EA 350.00 4,200.00
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE A
STREETS AND DRAINAGE
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
23. Specific Site Grading & Two
Hundred and Twenty -Five Dol-
lars per Unit. 200 EA 225.00 45,000.00
24. Patio Pads $ Fifteen Dollars
and Eighty -Five Cents per
Square Yard 14,333 SY 15,85 227,178.05
25. Utility Pads $ Fifteen Dollars
and Eighty -F'i've Centsper
Square Yard 3,825 SY 15.85 60,626.25
26. Sidewalks $ Fifteen Dollars
and E'i ghtsy-Five Cents per
Square Yard 860 SY15,85 13,631,00
1,458,145.90
TOTAL
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE B
WATER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1. 12" Diameter Water Pipe $
Twenty -One Dollars per Unit
2. 8" Diameter Water Pipe $
Twelve Dollars and Eighty
Cents per Linear Foot
3. 6" Diameter Water Pipe $ Ten
Dollars and Fifty Cents per
Linear Foot
4. 4" Diameter Water Pipe $Ten
Dollars per Linear Foot
5. 3/4" Water Service Pipe $
Four Dollars and Sixty Cents
per Linear Foot
6. 12" Gate Valve n/Box $Eight -
Hundred and Fifty Dollars
175 LF 21.00 3,675.00
7,945 LF 12.80 101,696.00
14,005 LF 10.50 147,052.50
250 LF 10.00 2,500.00
30,000 LF 4,60 138,000.00
per Unit 1 EA 850.00 850.00
7. 8" Gate Valve w/Box $ Four
Hundred and Seventy Five Dol -
Lars per Unit
8. 6" Gate Valve w/Box $ Three
Hundred and Fifty -Five Dollars
per Unit
15 EA 475.00 7,125.00
40 EA 355.00 14,200.00
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEfULE B
WATER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
9. 12 X 8 Tee $ Three Hundred
Dollars per Unit
2
10. 12 X 6 Tee $ Three Hundred
Dollars per Unit
2
11. 12" 45° Bend $ Two Hundred
EA 300.00 600.00
EA 300.00 600.00
and Twenty -Five Dollars per
Unit 2 EA 225.00 450.00
12. 12" 222° Bend $ Two Hundred
and Twenty -Five Dollars per
Unit
13. 8" X 8" Cross $ Two Hundred
and Fifty Dollars per Unit
14. 8" X 6" Cross $ Two Hundred
and Twenty -Five Dollars per
Unit
15. 12" X 8" Reducer $ One Hund -
2
3
3
EA 225.00 450.00
EA 250.00 750.00
EA 225.00 675.00
red and Eighty Dollars per
Unit 2 EA 180.00 360.00
16. 8" X 8" Tee $ Two Hundred
Dollars per Unit
3 EA 200.00 600.00
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE B
WATER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
17. 8" X 6" Tee $ Two Hundred
Dollars per Unit
33
18. 8" X 4" Tee $ Two Hundred
Dollars per Unit
1
19. 8" 45° Bend $ One Hundred and
Fifty Dollars per Unit
11
20. 8" 222° Bend $ One Hundred
and Fifty Dollars per Unit
10
21. 8" 114°Bend $ One Hundred
and Fifty Dollars per Unit
10
22. 8" X 6" Reducer $ One Hundred
and Fifty Dollars per Unit
3
23. 8" Couplings $ One Hundred
and Fourty Dollars per Unit
1
24. 6" X 6" Cross $ Two Hundred
Dollars per Unit
EA 200.00 6,600.00
EA 200.00 200.00
EA 150.00 1,650.00
EA 150.00 1,500.00
EA 150.00 1,500.00
EA 150.00 450.00
EA 140.00 140.00
1 EA 200.00 200.00
s •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE B
WATER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
25. 6" X 6" Tee $ One Hundred
and Seventy Dollars per Unit
26. 6" Plug $ Fourty Dollars per
Unit
27. 6" 45° Bend $ One Hundred
Dollars per Unit
28. 6" 222° Bend $ One Hundred
Dollars per Unit
29. 6" 114° Bend $ One Hundred
Dollars per Unit
30. 12" Wet Connection $ Two
Thousand, Two Hundred per
40 EA 170.00 6,800.00
3 EA 40.00 120.00
30 EA 100.00 3,000.00
30 EA 100.00 3,000.00
15 EA 100.00 1,500.00
Unit 1 EA 2,200.00 2,200.00
31. 8" Wet Connection $ One
Dollars per Unit 2 EA 1,600.00 3,200.00
32. Fire Hydrant Assembly $ One
Dollars per Unit 42 EA 1.075.00 45,150.00
Thousand and Three Hundred
Thousand and Seventy -Five
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE B
WATER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
33. 3/4" Tap to 8" on Larger Pipe
no Saddles $ Thirty - Five
Dollars per Unit
34. 3/4" Tap w/Saddle $ Eighty -
Five Dollars per Unit
35. 3/4"Curb Stop $
Fifty -Five Dollars per Unit
36. 5' Bury Frostless Thermaline
Riser $ One Hundred and
Fifty Dollars per Unit
155 EA 35.00 5,425.00
275 EA 85.00 23,375.00
430 EA 55.00 23,650.00
430 EA 150.00 64,500.00
37. 10" Pressure Reducing Station
$ Twenty Thousand Dollars in
Lump Sum 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00
38. 8" Pressure Reducing Station
$ Seventeen Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars in Lump Sum 1 LS 17,500.00 17,500.00
39. Rock Excavation (Boulder) $
Seventeen Dollars and 50 Cents
per Cubic Yard 350 CY 17.50 6,125.00
40. Rock Excavation (Blasting) $
Twenty -Seven Dollars and
Fifty Cents
150 CY -27.50 4,125.00
• !
PROPOSAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
41. 6" Wet Connection $ One
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars
per Unit 3 EA 1,500.00 4,500.00
TOTAL 665,993.50
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE C
SEWER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1.
2.
8" Diameter Sewer Pipe $
Thirteen Dollars and Fifty
Cents per Linear Foot
Sewer Service Taps $ Fourty
Dollars per Unit
3. Manholes 4' Diameter 0-14 $
One Thousand One Hundred
20,786 LF 13.50 280,611.00
430 EA 40.00 17,200.00
Dollars per Unit 106 EA 1,100.00 116,600.00
4. Manholes 4' Diameter 14' Plus
$ One Thousand Four Hundred
per Unit 4 EA 1,400.00 5,600.00
5. Sewer Rise w/Plug $ Fifty
430 EA 50.00 21,500.00
6. Connections to Existing MHS
Unit .5 EA 500.00 2.500.00
Dollars per Unit
Five Hundred Dollars per
7. 4" PVC Sewer Service Pipe $
Seven Dollars and Fifty Cents
per Linear Foot
25,800 LF 7.50 193,500.00
• •
PROPOSAL
SCHEDULE C
SEWER SYSTEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE IN ESTIMATED UNIT
NO. WRITING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
8. Rock Excavation (Boulder) $
Seventeen Dollars and Fifty
Cents per Cubic Yard 350 CY -17.50 6,125.00
9. Rock Excavation (Blasting) $_
Twenty Seven Dollars and Fifty
Cents per Cubic Yard 150 CY 27.50 4,125.00
10. Concrete Encasement $ Twenty
Dollars per Linear Foot
TOTAL
100 LF 20.00 2000.00
649,761.00
• •
SUMMARY
TOTAL SCHEDULE A
TOTAL SCHEDULE B
TOTAL SCHEDULE C
$
$
1,458,145.90
665,993.50
649,761.00
2,773,900.40
RICHARD D. LAMM
Governor
•
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Street - Room 818
Denver, Colorado 80203
Administration (303) 839-3581
Ground Water (303) 839-3587
March 6, 1981
Ray Baldwin, Energy Impact Coordinator
Garfield County Planning Dept.
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mr. Baldwin:
J. A. DANIELSON
State Engineer
Re: Monument Creek Village
Sections 2 & 2; Battlement
Creek Village Section 1;
and Tamarisk Subdivision No. 2
In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the preliminary
plans for the above referenced subdivisions. We have also reviewed
the proposed decree for a plan for augmentation (Case No. 79CW350 and
79CW351). Although the decree is yet to be signed, it appears that
it will be finalized within the next month.
This office has several concerns which the county may choose to
consider in reviewing this and future subdivisions falling under this plan
for augmentation. These concerns are as follows:
1. The equation for determing depletions (as a function of the
difference between diversion and wastewater treatment plant
discharges) will in effect allow infiltration to the sewage
collection system to be considered as a credit. If infiltration
is significant, this situation could cause injury to other water
users and could result in a challenge to the decree. This
decree does allow for a three year period of sustained juris-
diction by the Court.
2. Water rights committed to augmentation when the water right
is out of priority include 200 acre-feet (leased) from Wildcat
Reservoir. This appears to be sufficient to meet the depletion
caused by consumptive use in the above referenced subdivisions.
Concern arises from the fact that the Wildcat Reservoir water is
leased and limited by the terms of the lease. This concern has
three elements: The lease can expire requiring renegotiation,
0 _f -1)1V7? ---7
MAR 9 1981 _J ,1
GARFIELD CO. NLANPiER
• •
Pay Baldwin
March 6, 1981 Page 2
there appears to be no mechanism to assure smooth transfer
to the residents of the community, and there exists no muni-
cipality or special district to represent the community in
future negetiations, and maintain legal responsibility.
3. All other sources of augmentation water are based on contracts
being sought or reservoirs not yet constructed. The status of
contracts or construction should be ascertained prior to future
subdivision.
4. These proposals are for a total of 848 lots. Current proposed
facilities for water and sewer have a capacity of 535 lots and
715 lots respectively. Detailed plans for expansion should be
required so that water and sewer facilities will become avail-
able as new filings are approved.
It appears that the proposed plan for augmentation will be adequate
if all the conditions and provisions are met. However, due to the number of
uncertainties present in the plan at this time, we could not recommend
approval which would lead to the sale of lots to individuals. We would
also like to review the details of the water leases prior to giving a final
recommendation.
We regret that we will not be able to attend the County Work Session
on March 19. We would be most happy to review additional material and to
provide comments as the planning progresses.
Very truly yours,
k ,I,,,,,,
Hal D. Simpson, P.E.
Assistant State Engineer
HDS/KCK:pkr
cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng.
Ralph Stallman
Land Use Commission
nttlement •
esa
[incorporated
Charles L. Pence • President
759 Horizon Drive, Suite #3 • P.O. Box 308 • Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 • 303/245-1300
May 29, 1981
Garfield County Planning Department
204 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Final Plat for Tamarisk Filing #2
Battlement Mesa
Gentlemen:
Submitted herewith is the Final Plat for Tamarisk Filing #2
of Battlement Mesa PUD. Attached please find the following:
1. Final Plat
2. Construction Drawings
3. Specifications
4. Negotiated Pay Schedule
5. Check for $480.00 Filing Fee
6. Copy of "Battlement Mesa Mobile Home Park Rules and
Regulations"
7. Letter agreeing to furnish, house and maintain a
snowplow for the use of the Garfield Road Maintenance
Department
8. Subdivision Improvements Agreement
Battlement Mesa has signed a contract with Ruedi Reservoir for
1,250 acre feet of water per year with an option for an additional
1,000 acre feet per year. This contract has been sent to Ruedi
for signature and execution is expected within two weeks.
The following supplemental data previously filed with the Planning
Plat dated February 18, 1981 are unchanged.
1. "Additional Information, Preliminary Plat"
2. Subdivision Summary Form
3. Ruling of Referee - In the Matter of the Application for
Water Rights of Battlement Mesa Inc. in the Colorado
River in Garfield County
1 •
Garfield County Planning Dept. -2- May 29, 1981
4. Letter dated January 30, 1981, from David J. Love, P.E.
of Wright -McLaughlin stating availability of water
supply and waste water treatment and projecting the
schedule for ultimate facilities
5. The letter. dated April 15, 1980, from Mr. Perry D. Olson
of the Colorado Division of Wildlife to Mr. Ray Baldwin
6. Information regarding the Water and Sanitary Sewer
Systems planning and operation
Should any additional information be needed please contact our
office.
Very truly your
Charles L. Pence
CLP/brs