The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.0 Staff ReportTYPE OF REVIEW APPLTCANT (OWNER) ARCH ITECT/REPRESENTATIVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PRACTICAL DESCRIPTION LOT SIZE ZONING File No. FPAA-7805 Director's Determination GH Amended Final Plat Lot S-8 Aspen Glen Filing No. 8 Amended Building Envelope Dave and Sandy Everett Dean Sparaco, Regan Construction Lot S-8 Aspen Glen Filing No. 8, according to the plat thereof recorded as Reception No. 556667. 649 Homestead Dr. Carbondale Colorado. The site is located approximately 4 miles northwest of the Town of Carbondale (Assessor's Parcel Number 2395-134-07-008). 0.278 acres Aspen Glen PUD (% Acre Zone District) PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS !. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL . REQUEST The Applicant is requesting an amended Final Plat to modify the building envelope for Lot S-8 to better accommodate a proposed single family residence. The proposalwill reduce the envelope along the front yard and east side yards and increase the envelope along the west side yard and rear yards. The overall envelope size of the envelope will decrease by 62 sq.ft. from 3,570 sq.ft. to 3,508 sq.ft. The property is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is within the Tq Acre Residential Zone District of the Aspen Glen PUD. No changes to any easements and utility alignments will result from the proposed changes. II. AUTHORITY - APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Amended Final PlatApplication is being processed in accordance with Section 5-305, Amended Final Plat and 4-103, Administrative Review of the Land Use and Development Code. Public notice Director's Decision was completed by the Applicant in accordance with Sections 4-103, 4-101 and Table 5-103. III. STAFF ANALYSIS 1 . The proposed adjustments to the building envelope are consistent with the Ta Acre Zoning and will maintain PUD required setbacks (see attached). The Application is consistent with County Policies related to setbacks and building envelopes within the Aspen Glen PUD and will allow for the construction of a conforming structure. The fact that there will be no net increase in the building envelope size and required setbacks are being maintained supports the Applicant's request. 2. Potential impacts from the request are minimized by the fact that the increase in the envelope is proposed where the adjacent uses/properties are an Open Space Parceland a Golf Course Corridor Easement. Setbacks adjacent to other residential property east of the lot will be maintained or slightly reduced along with reductions in the envelope along the fronUstreet setback. 3. The Applicant has obtained approval from the Aspen Glen Homeowners Association (see attached letter). The County also referred the Application to the Homeowners Association and received addition confirmation that the current proposal is consistent with the previous Association approvals (see attached email). The Association review included notice to adjoining property owners and the Aspen Glen Club which manages the golf course. The Association comments also noted that the purpose of the proposa! is to enable the Applicant to configure the proposed home and garage to conform with the Aspen Glen Design Review Guidelines which discourage garage doors facing the street. 4. No nonconforming conditions will result from the proposal and no changes to easements, utilities, or drainage configurations will result from the proposal. 5. The Application was referred to the County Surveyor and compliance with his technical comments shall be required prior to final execution and recording of the amended plat. 6. Review of the amended plat by the County Attorney's Office will be conducted prior to presentation of the plat for signatures. All concerns of the County Attorney's Office including signature blocks shall be addressed by the Applicant. 7 . The Applicant's submittal waiver request from providing a subdivision improvements agreement was approved and is consistent with the waiver criteria contained in Section 4- 202. A!! improvements and infrastructure to serve the lot are in place and will not be impacted by the proposal. 8. The Applicant has provided copies of proof of mailing of the public notice to the adjacent property owners and owners of minera! rights on the subject property. No public comments were received by the Community Development Department. 9. The Application is in general conformance with the Review Criteria contained in Section 5-305 including no creation of new lots or new/relocated roadways. 2 IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff supports a finding that subject to compliance with conditions of approval the Amended Final Plat Application for Lot S-8 Aspen Glen Filing No. 8 meets the requirements and standards of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code including the Amended Plat Review Criteria contained in Section 5-305. The Application is recommended forAdministrative Approval by the Director of the Community Development Department subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. That all representations of the Applicant contained in the Application submittals shall be conditions of approval unless specifically amended or, modified by the conditions contained herein. 2. All requirements from the County Surveyor shall be met prior to submittal of the plat for final execution. 3. The Plat including signature blocks and plat notes shall be subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney's Office prior to submittal of the plat for final execution. 4. The Plat shall include a plat note indicating the purpose of the amended plat to be an adjustment to the building envelope on Lot S-8. A plat note shall also be required indicating that all previous plat notes set forth on the Final Plat of Aspen Glen Filing No. 8, as recorded as Reception No. 556667 and any amendments thereto shall remain in effect. 5. The Amended Plat shall be subject to compliance with the Aspen Glen Homeowners Association approval letter dated 12119113 to be attached as an exhibit to the Director's Decision. J -frEE \Eri. V/ f \\ \ --+ ,--- *l- /:E \ _J 't-_*--\\ ----l rfll-fr.er EIPEE TCIIX HOMESTEA.EI .* ROAII {!EiJ--4 i t_oTs7 I EEryEE}ETMfEUE**'E-mF-C*-.rE!E EA E.tF EE+ EE'ETEG'MilEIE'TE'ffiNEEIIilfrE34Eflilm*'EEir- a aEsEIEr-BUtSUU Eil=EEqrn6EE-ru GPENIIPACE FARCEL l.*-DfflDd-*ffiE-i =ffi Hlil,sffJIllEffi ?gmtE3giF* @auEmE4ffi EI(GEHT ffi*I DRAT,T fifiEilBED PT.AT 4 Ermalqlr qEE*qxG-4FE Jf rbra H ct rteo w, n er-s .-lssrrcial io n u .1 s p e n G I e n, I n c, Design Rerieu Conlmitree December 19,2013 Mr. Glenn Hartman Garfield County C omm unity Development DeparEnent 108 8'n Steet, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 via email Re: Building Envelope Adjustment Lot 5-8/0649 Saddleback Road Dear Glenn, This letter is to confirm that the Aspen Glen Design Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the proposed plat amendment to adjust the building envelop of Lot S-8 (0649 Saddleback Road) at their meeting December 11, 2013. The adjustment proposes to reduce the building envelop on the north end, the front of the lot and expand the south and west sides which do not encroach into the setbacks. The overall size of the building envelop will remain relatively the same. The purpose of this adjustment is to enable the garage to fit on the front of the property and meet the Aspen Glen Design Review Guidelines. The Guidelines discourage garuge doors facing the street. The west side of the building envelop that is expanding abuts HOA common open space which is a berm that parallels County Road 109; the south side faces the Aspen Glen golf course. Although there are no direct property owners that are impacted by this adjustment, the DRC has noticed adjacent property owners, including the Aspen Glen Club which manages the golf course, of the proposed amendment. Any comments will be forwarded back to the DRC and to you for consideration. The DRC recommends approval to the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners with the following conditions: l. A copy of the recorded amended plat shall be provided to the DRC. 2. The DRC has only approved the building envelop plat amendment. Any further improvements to properfy shall be submitted for DRC review and approval. 3. The reduction and expansion represents a rough net exchange ofsquare footage. The DRC anticipates the opportunity to review the plat amendment application submitted to Garfield County. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Leslie Lamont, Administrator Aspen Glen Design Review Committee Cc: Mr. Dave Everett Mr. Dean Sparaco 0080 BaldEagleWay Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel: (970) 963-3362 Email : le s I ie I arnont@aspe ngl e nho a. c o m I Glenn Hartmann From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Leslie Lamont fiezlamont@gmail.com] Monday, March 03,2014 10:00 AM Glenn Hartmann 'Dean Sparaco'; dave.evereft@reagan.com Aspen Glen amended Plat Lot S-8 Good morning Glenn. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed building envelope adjustment for Lot S-8, 549 Saddleback Road, as proposed by Dave and Sandy Everett. The amended plat submitted with this application is consistent with the draft amended plat that was reviewed by the Design Review Committee at their December Ll,2OL3 meeting. At that meeting the DRC voted to recommend approval of the adjustment to Garfield County. Thank you, Leslie Lamont, Administrator Aspen Glen Design Review Committee 1 Asp* 6lat O PI,D 5. Qno* 835 prteSS? 1/4 ACRE RESIDENTTAL ZONE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS : Single-family detached structures intended for individual lot ownership' o o o (b) (c) (d) \ (a) Permitted Uses Minimum Lot Size Maximum Building Height Minimum Front Yard if Abutting County Road 109 Single-family residential plus accessory uses excePt guest and/or caretaker's qu arters; home occuPation 10,890 sq.ft (")Minimum Front Yard if Abutting Public/Private Street Minimum L,ot Widtht Minimum Lot DePth Maximum Floor Area Ratio Minimum Rear Yard Minimum Each Side Yard Corner Lot Minimum Side Yard Abutting Public/?rivate Street -7- 25 ft. 50 ft. from ROW line 30 ft. from roadwaY easement/ROW 75 ft (at building setback) 120 ft. .35 20 ft. 10 ft. or lD height of principal building whichever is greater 15 ft. from roadwaY easemenUROW (f) (e) (h) (i) CI) (l) Minimum Off Street Parking per DU 4 spaces (k) +cul-de-sac, pie shaped and flag lots may havg a less-than minimum width measured at'building selback, but no lot shall have less than 25 feet of width on public access right-of-way or easement. t- GurJield County SURVEYOR scorT AIBNER, P.L.S To:Frank Harrington - High Country Engineering From: Scott Aibner - Garfield County Surveyor Subject: Plat Review - Amended Final Plat of Lot 8S, Aspen Glen Filing 8 Date 03/20/20t4 Dear Frank, Upon review of the Amended Final Plat of Lot 8S, Aspen Glen Filing 8 Plat, I have prepared a list of comments or corrections to be made prior to approval for survey content and form. 1. The acreage listed in the Certificate of Dedication and Ownership does not apply to this parcel Once this and all final comments from Community Development have been completed, the Mylar may be prepared for recording. The Mylar shall be delivered to the Community Development office with all private party signatures no later than Monday the week prior to the next commissioner meeting day in order to make that meeting. Sincerely, Scott Aibner Garfield County Surveyor cc Glenn Hartmann - Community Development Department 109 8 th Street ,Suite 1008. Glenwood Springs, C081601 , (970)945-1377 , Fm: (970)384-3460. e-mail:saibner@garfield-countycom