HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.01 Access PermitMernorandum
'fp; Mike Smith --Colorado i)epartment ofTransportation
Prom: J(% lloi'u . 1).E.
April 12, 2000
t7e: Cet'irA:17an h Highway Access Permit Applications
Hc 1'rcrjM Nor. 99054.01
I:?nclone(.i plc!ns) find a copy Of, the airbill and !racking detail for the referenced project submittal to C1)O'I'. As
you can stye the submittal was, delivered to your office cin January 19, 2000 by UPS. We are in the process of
utak Our submittal for preliminary plan on Cerise Hanel) and the county has requested a copy of the access
permit for the prOjcct. As of this clam, we have, not received any information from your office with retards, to
til.; above referenced Submittal. It is my understanding that if we do not have a response from your office
within (60 days of our submittal 11111 our permit is, granted by default.
My client would rather receive written caufirumtion from C'1)O'1' that his permit has been, granted Please let
rue know if my understanding of the white is correct, and please provide: written confirmation that our permit
leas been approved. if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
'thanks
Joe
923 COOPER AVENUE • (:if .FNWOOU SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
'1'l;t.ITHONE (970) 915-8'76 • FAX (970) 945.2555
11111 1L. VV VI Liv V1 • 1V , lI Il .'Mu vVV11.1 ., ,., ,r'.,,uu,. •.,.n
UPS Next Day Air'
UPS worldwide Express_
it+' F P1nQ Uocluf ,••t?
c:ixl tout+1,14.I1rr15. C,It i•K'N.•k. Call 1 -800 -PICK-UPS (8C0-742'.,.;,877)
for ilk kilt' rarlr'd Icif Cll'inralOn,
',*FfAC INO'NuMBEA
J 021,1 727 660 4
h HWMtU Fa.1koi •
UF'5 Hlf�l'EN No. U" $ 1:11LL!N9 NO.
004:30.
` t r•.I.1t rar,NCE (fuM.',cr1
99054.01
M110Pftr'e
r,tnY
ACQL UNT,
Ntl,
ll
OR
3 Us4
r • 1,EL.F:P ONF
970-945--8676
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING
923 COOP Ei AVL
I.)
CrrYANSrArf; -
. c i.,.t' r1/41wcxalr SP GS
% EXTREM • 1 Y i1RaEM1' CieUV TO
M:l.ke Sz+ttth
•
Ca
zlp Cont
81601:3629
TELEPHONE
CI.I„Ha,NY
Colorado Dept. of Transportation
r%i.LTAG'r1;i. rv,...,
ii0E3. 9th Street
C!Ty A?io >'r n1(t1IC(' CUijllTA/ IF INT,RNATICFIAL)
Grind Junction
co
?IP CGpF,
81501 CI11aa,R;
51VNA1'VRE /t
1111111
IIIIH( 11
(111(1
WLICII
:1.
try[ Of';,,
ytnvIS E:
s
r, T OIM/�(N$IONAL
ENTER "tin' IU' EK. i'
[.)NTIONAI,
'IF r,V1cl'
G A0141,„NAI
HANIICING
CHANGE
1
10TAL
CHAT E5
L T R
ClNEXT DAY
Weal:11C N'this tall A :Orval %N•y —+ Li`ILY
MUM Itkidr lG a NVirrtl.`�T. W NAV
SATURDAY — SATIJHDAV
ELN''�E rlFR1Y
Sn
SHIPPER'S
COPY 71
WORiLOWIPE
EXPNESS
(INTEFINATKC)NAL)
1 DCcLAfiED VALUE
r yam .,.. Et) rmy
1MtNWl1 aa, 00 IMir..wJ
,,, AMOUNT
1111 F.
igM . Mw,a ir/,pMW
vr94:PO cnroyawgA $
AMOUNT
An Adrll!l' *I Ha,dfnO Charon **am lar cartaln
items Soo InolrunIN:hs.
Ll!1 TMIa
a t,
a1 L I FihoNEa PAatt COEDIT
c .q,mlN �N'INI1Cer AS`C•w^•-) C c MuuI f Eapus.
1.
v7sa
tiCa
Omn,1^:b
CHARM!
C,n:w
O
RIC—:EN r TMNU PVfiiY'S Uf'$ • NO, OR wor.a CrtDIT 7740 1), yFdA,'�C J ; ;;
ZIP IJOCE 1 tj'
ri
.1,/
,
iTtY
TE Of ?r 1
:;•
TH1r9D PAf1TY'S COMPANY NAME
SI Ht E'r AOnl:1
C;TY AND S'A"F'
fl..PSY.lM�W. 1,x14
Yvf ••••• I.".••••MM..r. Yom..=�•w.�
010191126948E
UjS) United Parcel Service
Period Ending
January 22, 2000
Shipper 804-3E0
Invoice 00008043E0-040
Page 4 of 5
Waybill,
(CuriiinuCrl)
Air Shipping Document Detail
Bill Shipper
Shipped Tracking No. Zane Count/
Service Silted Weight
01-18 J024 7276 604 102 Letter
Next Day Air
Re(erenc* No.
99054,01
Chargo
Sender Receiver
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEE MIKE SMITH
GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 COLORADO
JUNCTIONT CO
OFTRGRAA
Transportation 11.75
An incentive of $1.50 has been included in the
"Incentives" section of this bill. The net charge
for this shipment is 110.25.
TQ1 1 11.75
Air Shipping Document Detail
WN Shipper
Shipped Tracking N. Zone Count/ Charge
Service Billed Weight
01-13 J024 7276 837 102 1
Next Day Air ,. „ ,..... Letter.,.,.
Reference No.
99765.02
Sender Receiver
JAY AXTELI STAN MATHIS
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEE WIDEFIELD CO 80911
GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 Transportation
An incentive of $1.50 has been included in the
"Incentives" section of this bill, The net charge
For this shipment is $10,25.
11,75
Total
11.75
•d'r:;oking
,
(F..,,(' 1.')
q,'i J ?V 1111114111' 1 i Al :';,1140
TD,1CK 'AN D1.11(.F.i,:',l iI,1.iF:i I:°h
`^I .J J..�I,d iii''"a "J' rl .. •• ;
Ti .1NG N.IN,l1FR 11`;_::.:i:,;r'...
Ilickh id petal
Status:
Delivered on:
Delivered to:
Locatiln):
Shipped to:
ShiA1'led or i3illcd on:
'I•racking Number:
Service •1'Ype
http://wwwapps.ups,comietracking/tracking.cgi
11Y.Y,ir.
Delivered
J:,n 19, 2000 12:38 P,M. •
WILCOX
RECEIVER
GRAND) JUNCTION_ CO. US
Jut 18, 2000
3024 7276 604
NEXT L)AY AIR
„
,tilv; , ,,•Location Activity
Jan 19, 12:38 GRAND JUNCTION, CO, DELIVERY
2()0)0 t',M• IJS
12:38 GRAND JUNCTION, CO, ADVERSE WFA'1II1,R CONDITIONS DLLAY;CONTAC'1,
1",M, US U,P.S. FOR STATUS
GRAND JUNCi'ION, CO, ADVERSE WEA'I'I IER CoNf)iTioNS DELAY ;CONTACT
12:y2
P,M, US U.P.S. TOR S 1 ATUS
12:32 GRAND JUNCTION, CO, DELIVERY
P.M, US
7:51 (IRANI) JUNCTION, CO, DESTINATION SCAN
A,M. US
7:25 GRAN[) JUNCTION, CO, UPDATED ARRIVAL
A.M. US
7:25 GRAND) JUNCTION, CO, ARRIVAL SCAN
A,M. US
7:20 DENVER R IN'T7., CO, US ADVERSE \VENT!1ER CONDITIONS 1)L'.LAY
RIFLE, CO, US D1PAR'1 URi: SCAN
RIFLE, CO, US ARRIVAL SCAN
DENVER 1N1 L, CO, US DEPARTURE SCAN
DIA (i)ENVER), CO, US
A,M,
6:25
A.M.
(i:15
A.M,
5:x19
3:43 LOCATION SCAN
A,M. A
Jab 1:3, r):0i� 1',114. 1)l:1'(1')ENVER), CO, US 1.,(:)(:,'R l ION SCAN
2101, PIt;1:t1P Mr\N11' 1SS`I RECEIVED
1)
(i 1'� 1'•M, GLEN \VIVA) SPRINGS, ORIGIN SCAN
IS
f:,51 l".�I. Cii,[;NVWl()Oi) SPRINGS, PICKUP SCAN
CO, US ,
`rrl.tc:king results provided by UPS: Mar 22, 2000 4:10 P.M. 'Eastern Time (USA)
NO'I.10E t1PS authorizes you to u5c UPS tracking systems solely to track hip nems lei d arerm tbnyn is r for
you to
UPS for delivciy'and for no other purpnsr, Any other' use. of UPS tracking
prohibited.
3/22/00 2:11 P
/7/Gh"
LUNl�I�
•
,Memorandum
To: Mike Smith — Colorado Department of Transportation
From: Eric Tuin, E.I.
Date: January 17, 2000
Re: Cerise Ranch Highway Access Permit Applications
Hce Project No: 99054.01
Enclosed please find two "State Highway Access Permit Applications" for the Cerise Ranch Subdivision. The
development is located just west of Dakota Subdivision and about one mile east of Catherine on the north side
of State Highway 82. The development consists of 67 single family homes, with a potential 67 accessory
dwelling units. We are proposing one main access to the subdivision in the general location of the Cerise's
existing driveway, and an emergency access that will be gated to the east.
Thank you for your time in reviewing these applications. We are requesting that you review the applications by
the 4`s of February if possible. We are submitting the preliminary plan application that day and would like to
have some indication as to the status of the access permit applications. Please also fax or send us a copy of any
correspondence regarding the application. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call Joe Hope or
Eric Tuin.
Thanks
Eric
923 COOPER AVENUE • GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
TELEPHONE (970) 945-8676 • FAX (970) 945-2555
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION
Issuing authority application
acceptance date:
Instructions: - contact the Department of Transportation or your local government to determine your issuing authority.
- contact the issuing authority to determine what plans and other documents are required to be submitted
with your application.
11 - complete this form (some questions may not apply to you) and attach all necessary documents and
submit it to the issuing authority. Submit an application for each access requested.
- if you have any questions contact the issuing authority. Please print or type
1) Property owner (Permittee)
Mumbert Cerise Family Co.
2) Applicant
Art Kleinstein — Wintergreen Homes
street address, city
17072 State Hwy 82 Carbondale
street address, city
P.O. Box 978 Avon
state & zip
Colorado 81623
phone #
state & zip
Colorado 81620
phone #
303-322-4119
3) Address of propety to be served by permit (if known)
17072 Hwy 82
4) Legal description of property:
county subdivision block lot sect on township range
Garfield 1 1 1 33 1 7S 1 87W
5) What state highway are you requesting access from?
Highway 82
6) What side of the highway El N ❑ S ❑ E ❑ W
7) How many feet is the proposed access from the nearest mile post?
1056 feet (circle: N S E0) from: MP 17
How many feet is the proposed access from the nearest cross street?
4665 teat(circle: N S E d )from: Dakota Drive
8) Check here if you are requesting a
❑ new access 0 temporary access 0 improvement to existing access ® change in access use 0 removal of access
9) What is the approximate date you intend to begin construction?
Fall 2000 to Spring 2001
10) Do you have knowledge of any State Highway access permits serving this property, or adjacent properties in which you have a property interest.
® no 0 yes, if yes - what are the permit number(s)?: and/or, permit date:
110 r)oes the property owner own or have any interests in any adjacent property?
® no 0 yes, if yes - please describe:
12) Are there other existing or dedicated public streets, roads, highways or access easements bordering or within the property?
® no 0 yes, if yes - list them on your plans and indicate the proposed and existing access points.
13) If you are requesting commercial or industrial access please indicate the types and number of businesses and provide the floor area square footage of each.
business square footage business square footage
N/A
l
14) If you are requesting agricultural field access - how many acres will the access serve?
N/A
15) If you are requesting residential developement access, what is the type (single family, apartment, townhouse) and number of units?
type number of units type number of units
1
Single Family
i t
Accessory Dwelling Unitas
a`
16) Provide the following vehicle count esti,-
® peak hour volumes •
• at passenger cars and light trucks
99
1
3
o
n
0
a`
id single unit vehicles in excess
0
al j
o
ai
6 —
a
0-to
17) Check
IP
ct3
with theist-
(plans
a
.`
t t-0
co
L N_
...
04/17/2000 10:01 9709274261
LAND STUDIO
PAGE 02
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION date:
COLORADO
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION aowvartoe
Instructions: • contact the Department of ltansportation or your local government to determine your issuing authority.
• contact the Issuing authority to determine what plans and other documents are required to be submitted
with your application.
- complete this form (some questions may not apply to you) and attach all necessary documents and
submit 8 to the issuing authority. Submit an application for each access requested. PNa� print or •
- i1 you have any questions contact the issuing authority. P type
t) Property owner (Plummets)
Humbert Cerise Family Co.
2) Applicant
Art Kleinstein — Wintergreen Homes
sweet address, city
(ivy 82 Clirbondale
skeet address, c ty
P.O. Box 978 Avon
17072 State
stew 1i9 Imine a
Colorado 81623
stale 4 tips
Colorado 81620
303-3 22-4119
3) Ad`—dins— ss popery to ba served by permit to known)
17072 Hwy 82
4) Lego) description o1 property now
MOO, wM••w w pOa awwwsp
Garfield 1 1 1 1.33 1 7S 1 87W
5) What stets highway are you requesting access from/
Highway 82
6) Whet side of the highway MN OS OE Ow
7) How many feet is the prup010d aecats bpm Ina nearest mile posh
1320 Iwo (cede! N SOW )bone HP 17
Now many new Is fee pwpo/.0 axles hon die neuOel Gots 100417
526 f.r(cocle: N 5 E®)son:• pakote Drive
Check nets i) you are requesting a
El new access 0 temporary access 0 Improvement to existing access 0 charge In access use 0 removal o1 access
e) Whal Is fit approximate dere you Intend 10 txtgin conunrcion7
Pall 2000 to Spring 2001
10) Do you harm knowledge o1 any Mew Nlplw ey access permits serving this property. or ad)eunl properties in vriedl you MN • property Interest.
a no 0 yes. jt yes - what are the permit number(s)?.. and/or, permit date:
11) Does the property owner own or have any interest in any .dj.o nI property?
CO no 0 yes, it yes - please describe:
12) Ar. tare 001w.Ylsting or dedicated public straal6. roads, highways or access Ns.rn.n1$ bordaring or within the prop orty?
Ili no 0 yes, it yes -1151 them on your plans and indicate the proposed and existing access points.
is) It you ars ,questing commercial or indirevW access please indicate the typos end number d tarslravea and provide the floor wee sowr.lootage of sent.
business /quare footega business *aware footage
N/A l
1
1
1
44) It you r. ,Wssen4 .gricubufIl 6eb socials - how many taros will n,. .ocean earnm7
N/A
' 5) it you ate requesting r.sid■nrial dev41op.ment aces ea. whet 0 the type (single farcy. ■p.rtmont, kOwnhOU$.) end number of units?
of unit ryp. number of unit.
YP
Inumber
Emergency Access Only 1
1
1
16) Provide the following vehicle count estimates lot vehicles that wig use the access. Leaving the property 11.0 returning is two carrels. Indicate II yowl COUM1 are
0 peak hour volumes or ® average daily volumes.
.• pe.wgry s r 44 taw livor
0Emergency
r d wJ. ‘44 0.414
Vehicles
6 d#r ..r.dw
0
r de..rfr ,oil ..ta,r. a ..e_ r30 a
Emergency Vehicles
'r .1s......i,�r. iti.+..,...w.i
1 0
Tout orient of all vehicles
Emergency Vehicles
17) Check with dile issuing authority to dewrmine which of the following document re required to complete the ',Weird your applicason.
(plana should be no larger then 24- x36')
e) Property map indicating cater =cask, bordering roads and sews.
e) Nighw.y and driveway plan profits. I) Proposed access design
wig.ssenient.
b) Drainage pen showing Impact to to highway right.ol-way. g) Parcel end ownership mope
e) Map end letters detailing witty locations b.lors and after hl Signing and alnpeng plans.
d rmlopmenl in and along the righl•ol-way I) %rile control plan.
d) Subdivlyon. toning, or development pion. )) Proof of liability Insurance,
11 an access permit is issued to you it will state the terms and conditions for its use. Any changes in the use o1 the permitted
access not consistent with the terms and conditions listed on the permit may be considered a violation of the permit.
The applicant declares under penalty of perjury in the second degree, and any other applicable stale or federal
laws, that all information provided on thls form and submitted attachments are to the beet of their knowledge true
and complete.
App., naw,
Data
-13-200o
spilt
aul
application by
the permittee.
is no the owner of the property. we require thIs application also to be signed by the property owner or their
retsentative (or other acceptable written evidence). This signature shall constitute agreement wkh this
all owners -of -Interest unless slated Wt writing. d e permit is authorized, the property ownerw$I be Nsted as
Property own*/ alpn6vro /
A.Pd ..w. _ _1/ C444L.
Date
1 13 - 200o
•
•
•
12/14/1999 15:34 9799274251
Duo- 09-99 04;48P
�'a�c�vcoi
Deo.m ser 9 1999
LAND STUDIO
Mike Smith
C-olorark t of portatice
606 South 9th Street
Grand lunation. CO :1501
LAND STUDIO
Re: Cerise Ranch Acme Permit Application
Dear Mika:
PAGE 02
P. 10
PAM e:
Pkue consider tail letter u aurbotizstioa for
representatives fur the Mwnbert Cerise Fundy Co- i EngineeringPartnership.
nehp. to act at
Cerise owner a the
property, e for the applicant. w nierg een Homes Limited LiabilityCompany.equitable agent
t to du parcdaar meats dated hatauy 23,1997 and
Mry2benveee RimerTen Homes Limited Liability Company aod 1a:Cerise�
Co. Limited Parta,p
Respectfully,
by
Owner
Id to :ben Family Co. Limited Partnership
Kern CcetSC,
Agent kr the Appiicaat
Rietreea }lows debited
cerise' . » c
Book 343
Page 755
Recorded at 10:00
Reception No
51gto1
o'clock
hl. August 4. 14$2 i� 6Cb � 5K�`
Fee $6.00pd
!.111:1
•
a
azik/aini geed
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT
MUMEERT CERISE and LAURINE CERISE
First Party
17072 State Highway 82
P.O. Box or Street Address
Carbondale Colorado
81623
City
State Zip
for and in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable
to
MUMBERT CERISE FAMILY CO.
RKor ,., cC 00(01
a
• 'a individually
Cl single person
❑ a Colorado Corporation
❑ a Partnership
❑ a limited Partnership
consideration, in hand paid, hereby sells and quitclaims
Second Party
17072 State Highway 82
P.O. Box or Street Address
Carhondal e Colorado
81623
City State
Zip
the following described property in the County of
C=arfi"l d
•❑ intlividually
❑ joint tenancy
❑ tenancy in common
❑ a Colorado Corporation
❑ a Partnership
El a limited Partnership
❑ a Trust
TRACT NO. 1
and State of Colorado:
All the following described lots or parcels of land situate,
lying and being in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado, to -
wit:
Lots Two(2), Seven (7), Eight (8), Twenty (20) and Twenty -One
(21), Section Thirty-two (32), and Lots One (1), Three (3) and
Fifteen (15), Section Thirty-three (33), Township Seven (7)
South, Range Eighty-seven (87) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian,
containing two hundred sixty-five and sixty-four one hundredths
(265.64) acres, more or less, together with First Parties' interest
in and to the Blue Creek Ditch, taking water from Blue Creek and
the Harris and Reed Ditch, taking water from the Roaring Fork
River, together with the water and aitch rights belonging thereto.
(continued on back)
with ail its appurtenances.
/.1/ � �o-S ti A D 19 4
SIGNED this day of
g0a
rt Cerise
44'14-,Kt../ei_,I.44
iU
ne Cerise
STATE OF COLORADO
)ss.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
The foregoing instrument wras acknowledged before me this
19Yby Mumbert Cerise and Laurine Cerise.
my hand and official seal.
•;
•
•
t_
-n
m
0
/.U4CtO) a13luUYO
SECOND PARTY AT ADDRESS GIVEN
welels xel •Jnlnl
O
r
3
z
O
3
m
i
7
A
O
s
'0
slyl 03111° Aw (it Wey P103e1
0.
A
5
'OOVUOIOO 30 31V1S
TRACT NO. 2
•
0
z
0
ao.ix 606 ii570
A11 the following described lots or parcels of land, situate,
lying and being in the Counties of Garfield and Eagle and State of
Colorado, to -wit:
Lot 14 and WhShNWhNE:, Section 33, and the SWkSEh of Section 29,
all in Township 7 South, Range 87 West, 6th P.M.
. TRACT NO. 3
All the following described lots or parcels of land, situate,
lying and being in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado, to -wit:
The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36 in Township
6 South and the Lots 5, 6, 10 and 11, the Southeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter, the East half of the Southwest Quarter,
the South Half of the Northeast Quarter and the Southeast Quarter
of Section 1 in Township 7 South, all in Range 87 West of the
Sixth Principal Meridian.
Together with all ditch and water rights, if any, appertaining
to or used in connection with said land.
•
CERISE RANCH
TRAFFIC STUDY
PREPARED FOR:
WINTERGREEN HOMES
P.U. BOX 978
AVON, CO 81620
(970) 322 - 4119
PREPARED BY:
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.
923 COOPER AVENUE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
(970) 945-8676
AUGUST 27, 1999
REVISED DECEMBER 27, 1999
JOB NUMBER 99054.01..
qo' r"r1mO (\frnlI . f_i cnnnffulr? cop1rlf r t fl ril P1901
•
1
•
CERISE RANCH
TRAFFIC STUDY
INTRODUCTION
This traffic study for the Cerise Ranch addresses the capacity, geometric, and traffic control
requirements associated with a proposed residential development located north of State
Highway 82 (SH 82) just west of the Garfield/Eagle County Line, in Garfield County.
Colorado. Please refer to Figure 1 for the vicinity map.
EXISTLNG AND PROPOSED LAND USES
The site is currently vacant and is being used for agricultural uses. The developer is proposing
developing the site into a residential community of 67 units, and 67 accessory dwelling units.
SITE ACCESS
Access is proposed from SH 82. The development proposes two access points onto SH 82,
one being used for Emergency vehicles ONLY, please see Figure 1 for an approximate
location of the residential access point. The existing SH 82 is a four -lane, 65 mph, east/west
roadway. with turning lanes provided at the major intersections.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The surrounding. land uses are as follows. SH 82 borders the project along the entire South
boundary. Dakota Subdivision is adjacent on the east boundary and the remaining boundary is
surrounded by hillside and and open agricultural space.
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation was estimated using Trip Generation, 6th Edition published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1997. Table 1 shows the daily and peak hour trip generation for
this development. A trip is defined as a one way vehicle movement from the origin to
destination. The origin or destination of a generated trip would be within the site area. For
the purpose of this study, the data in Table 1 is grouped into land uses for the project.
•
-1
•
}
RANCH SITE
•
n
Catherine
1 1 '•,
O '71
•r -
w
o pGPOSE ACCESS POI
" __`tip 1 L fit • _1
`.. /Mulford F % -es.
I,_,`_��_ -rte
urs . Cv=R- : ��;
`/f C
saes
•
ogJC �•Z
•
1
- - _ --. / �I a9 //
•
/ .f•1 _ / / - -
lam-%./../ 99//_��
✓` .moi /\ �,,....i.
.1, ..* ' ''' -..... ......-*:;,.....:,-->:_cl,"7 . •
c\-,', ,---7-s-t--,i,
•i�, __..................,...._... -, f? i t 1 ''--.
— 1
r/
•
r
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
HIOH COUNTRY Eta INC.
923 COOPER AVENUE
GL NWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
rn7fl n � flfi7F
WINTERGREEN HOMES
GARFIELD COUNTY
CEREE RANCH
TRAFFIC STUDY
= 2000' '
DES. SCE C�c.
•JOH I FILE NO. I SHEET 1
•
•
•
LAND USE
TOTAL
UNITS
TRIP GENERATION
AM PEAK PM PEAK
AVERAGE TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS
WEEKDAY
TRIPS Ir OUT IN OUT
SINGLE FAMILY 67 641 l3 39 44 34
UNITS
ACCESSORY 67 444 11 27 27 13
DWELLING UNITS
(APARTMENTS)
TOTAL
134 1085 24 66 71 42
TABLE 1
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The overall directional distribution of the site -generated traffic was based upon the existing
travel patterns in the area and in consideration of trip attractions and productions in this area.
Traffic distribution was based upon traffic counts taken on SH 82 on October 21, 1997 by
Counter Measures, Inc. and turning movement traffic counts at the intersection of SH 82 and
the Dakota Subdivision access. The counts taken indicate an approximate distribution of 60%
East and 40% West. This distribution was applied to the proposed Cerise Ranch intersection •
with SH 82.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Twenty-four hour traffic counts with AM and PM peaks were taken on SH 82. Count data is
provided in Appendix A. The traffic data is displayed graphically in Figures 2 - 4.
Table 2 shows the level of service analysis results using the twenty-four hour traffic counts,
AM and PM peaks for the proposed Cerise Ranch intersection. The analysis was performed
using the "Highway Capacity Software" which is based on the equations and data contained
within the "Highway Capacity Manual". Printouts of the software analysis results are provided
in the Appendix B. The intersection using today's traffic is operating at a LOS A for the A.M.
peak hour and LOS B for the P.M. peak hour. It will continue to operate at the same level of
service for the 2020 traffic projection. The model used assumed that a left turn deceleration"
lane would be installed on the eastbound lane of SH 82. A left turn acceleration lane would
also be installed for this lane, although the addition of the lane would not affect the levet of
service. Turning lanes were also included for the westbound lane of SH 82 to make for a
better and safer intersection.
•
t
LEVEL OF SERVICE SUNLIVIARY
CERISE RANCH SUBDIVISION
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Level of Intersection Level of
Delay Service Delay Service
(Seconds) (Seconds)
1 Cerise Ranch Existing + 7.8 A 10.8 B
Intersection Site Traffic
2020 ± Site 8.? A 14.0 B
Traffic
TABLE 2
Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. Level of Service classifications
are defined as follows:
Level of Service A - describes primarily free flow operation at average travel speeds usually
about 90 percent of the free flow average speed. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their
ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Stopped delay at intersection is minimal.
Level of Service B - represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds
usually about 70 percent of the free flow speed. The ability to maneuver within the traffic
stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not
generally subjected to appreciable tension.
Level of Service C - represents stable operations. However. ability to maneuver and change
lanes in mid block locations may be more restricted than in LOS B. and longer queues and/or
adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent
of the average free flow speed. Motorists will experience an appreciable tension while driving.
Level of Service D - borders on a range which small increases in flow may cause substantial
increases in approach delay and, hence, decrease in speed. This may be due to adverse signal
progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these.
Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free flow speed.
Level of Service E - is characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds
on one-third free flow speed or lower. Such operations are caused by some combination or
adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical intersections, and
inappropriate signal timing.
Level of Service F - characterizes flow at extremely low speeds below one-third to one-quarter
of the free flow speed: Intersection congestion is likely at critical locations, with high
approach delays resulting. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition..
•
•
Definitions were paraphrased from the "Highway Capacity Manual".
Trip Assignment
Combining the results of the trip distribution and trip generation develops trip assignment.
Due to the nature of the project. only short range trip assignments were performed. It is most
likely that this project will be completely developed prior to the typical long term (20 years)
period. Therefore, the roadways within the project should be developed to handle complete
build out of the project at this time.
Figure 4 shows the fully developed peak hour traffic for the intersection. The traffic
generated by the site combined with the existing traffic determines the total traffic at the
intersection.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
Table 2 shows the level of service for each of the intersections based on a complete build out
of the project. Computer printouts are provided in Appendix B.
RECOMMENDATIONS
This study analyzed the traffic generated by the proposed Cerise Ranch Subdivision and its
impacts on the proposed and existing transportation infrastructure. The internal intersections
within the Cerise Ranch Subdivision will not have enough traffic to require any significant
traffic controls.
As can be seen from Table 2 that the Cerise Ranch / Hwy 82 intersection will be operating at
above acceptable standards as an unsignalized intersection. Signalizing this intersection is not
necessary at this time, unless traffic is significantly increased on SH 82. With the addition of
the left turn acceleration and deceleration lanes the safety of the intersection will be improved
to allow safe turns into and out of the proposed subdivision.
In conclusion, the proposed intersection with SH 82 does not significantly impact the flow of
traffic on SH 82. The most difficult movement from the intersection will be the left turn onto
the eastbound lane of SH 82. The addition of turn lanes will not affect the level of service for
the intersection, but should provide a more safe transition onto SH 82.
•
STATE HIGHWAY 82
DAKOTA SUBDIVISION INTERSECTION
DAILY TRAFFIC
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CI CI)
cO CO
N
DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ENTRANCE
1
(9)
LEGEND
107 a QM. PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC
.;) P.M. PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC
1255
(1,132)
8
(6
STATE HIGHWAY 82
(8)
it
1,123
(484)
N_
cv)
�t
0
00
1
N
CO
2
r�
z
0
U
L
w
cc
1—
>-
Q
0
w
w
w
Q
cc
Lu
FIGURE 2
F�C;f I COU \ITRY Ham, INC.
_ 923 COOPER AVENUE
CLENW000 SPRINGS. CO 81601
WINTERGREEN HOMES
GARFIELD COUNTY
MIME RANCH
CES. SCE ICK- DH TFILE NO.
SHEET 1
•
STATE HIGHWAY 82
CERISE RANCH INTERSECTION
DIRECTIONAL PERCENTAGE
PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC
CERISE RANCH ENTRANCE 14
24 ()
(71)
66 26
(42) (17)
DECaA./I-RAGE
rC ECT TRAF= C
cn
W ^
0
LEGEND
7 A.M. PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC
(3) P.M. PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC
;,ik EXISTING PLUS PROJECT
GENERATED TRAFFIC
.82 A.M. PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC
(1,158) P.M. PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC
STATE HIGHWAY 82
oL
CV
40
(25)
N
t' )
r
FIGURE 3
F IQ1 COUNTRY ENGINEERNG, INC.
923 COOPER AVENUE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
WINTERGREEN HOMES
GARFIELD COUNTY
CEFISE RANCH
TRAFFIC STUDY
OES. SCE Cx. 1OH I F1LE NO. I S EE-
STATE HIGHWAY 82
CERISE RANCH INTERSECTION
2020 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND
PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC
CERISE RANCH ENTRANCE
24
(71)
' 66
26
(42) (17)
NOTE: 2020 2ACKGRCI,N'C
TRAFFIC IS EXISTING TRAFFIC
TIMES A 1.4 GROWTH ACTOR.
co
47
X14
(43)
LEGEND
7 A.M. PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC
(3) P.M. PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC
2020 TRAFFIC PLUS PROJECT j g
GENERATED TRAFFIC
280 A.M. PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC
(1,159) P.M. PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC
STATE HIGHWAY 82
T-RAFTC
—20200
TRAFFIC i
t
0)
FIGURE 4
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.
923 COOPER AVENUE
GLENW000 SPRINGS, CO 81601
(470) e4-1575
WINTERGREEN HOMES
GARFIELD COUNTY
CEREE RANCH
TRAFFIC STUDY
OES. SOE
CK. JOH
FILE NO. SHEET
• rvIc A M
•
APPENDIX A
•
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
t: Eric Tu.n
oeCt:Cn: Cerise Ranch / Highway 32
'cunt Date: 12-2'-33
?er:c.'.: A.M. Peak
.011me lata:
extents.
as: -Nest Xa:cr�:.
5 5 10 12
_.:me. 12 1134 277 14 40 26
=R: 17 1134 277 14 40 26
1.20 1.02 1.02 1.20 1.00 1.20
0.33 .0.35 0.05 0.30 3.00 2.00
?edestrian Volume Data:
lovements:
'_ow:
.ane width:
:alk speed:
Blockage:
,Tedian Type:
TWLTL
vehicles: 3
J. approach Movements:
▪ of vehicles: Northbound 0
• of vehicles: Southbound 2
L ane usage fcr Tcvements 1.213 approach:
`.ane 1 Lane 2
Lane 3
T
Y
N N N Y N N Y V
: hannelized: N
3rade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 4,S&5 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
L T R L T R
L
Lane 3
T R
N Y N N Y N N N Y
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
4110 L T R L T R L T R
N N N N N N N N N
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
ane usage for movements 10,11E.12 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
• Y
.anneliced:
rade:
. 20
ata for _omP :_-.; of ..__3:. :o :'!aj or
Eastpo V.^.d Westbound
^ared ln vo..lme, major _.. ._.._ores. 0 0
tared In volume, major r- v=_..i__as. 0
3t flow r3:e, major th ve^:__es: 1'00 1700
3_ _rod raze, 5.a __ f?^____n _'._ 1703
;tuber of ma:or st:___ _.._ Cg 3:es. _ ..
ength of study period, hrs: 1.00
4orksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation.
:ritical Gap Calculations:
"ovement 1 10 12
: c, base 4.1 7.5 3.9
c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0
: 0.00 0.00. 0.00.
0.2 ].1
0.00 0.00 0.00
It 0.0 0.7 0.0
c,T:
1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 stage 3.00 1.00 0.00
1 stage 4.1 3.3 3.9
2 stage 4.1 5.3 3.9
7o__ow Cb __..._ _3_..._3:_....5.
,ement
t ",base
f,HV
2 by
f
2.2
1.0
0.00
2.2
3.5
1.0
0.00
3.5
3.3
1.0
0.00
3.3
Worksheet 5 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9 12
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
139
891
1.00
891
0.97
11111 2: LT from Major St.
4 1
Co icting Flows 291
Potential Capacity 1282
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00
Movement Capacity 1282
Probability of Queue free St. 0.99
rksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance
TH from Minor St.
First Stage
3 11
n'_1_ct_^g Flows
:...._:3. Ca ac::
-ie3___3n :mpedance a__o_
"- '-sc_c_ die :mpeding
`Cape:-:
a.,
1154 277
274 635
1.]0 1.00
0.99 _ . 3
272 635
_.03 _.00
.__ _ Second _:ag
: __.._:a_ Ca^ac:t.
_mced3nc3 F3__o_
D. Ad; :3c:or due :o Impeding mvmnt
;v>_ment Capacity
291 1154
2 274
_-03 1.00
1.00 0.99
675 272
art 3- Single Stage
pnflicting Flows
tentiai Capacity
descrian Impedance Factor
3p. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Yemen: Capacity
1445
133
1.00
0.99
132
1431
136
1.00
0.99
135
for 2 stage process:
ro.baCLIzy of Queue free St.
0.97
0.26
261
1.00
0.97
4.01
261
1.00
comp`_tat-.,.. 3: t.._ 'Twc-stage gap acceptance
4 . _.- :on :•l1.10_ S:. 1:
_nfli_ting Flows
:tential Capacity
edescri-an Impedance Factor
ao. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
'ovement Capacity
1154
267
1.00
0.99
265
277
751
1.00
1.00
751
art 2- Second Stage
'onfliccing Flows 139 587
otential Capacity 880 524
,edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
:ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99
!ovement Capacity 854 520
?art 3- Single Stage
.cting Flows 1293 864
?o ,ial Capacity 157 297
?edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
laj. L, Min T Impedance factor
laj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
:ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
^.ovement Capacity
0.99 0.99
0.99 0.99
0.97 0.99
152 296
esult for 2 stage process:
•
0.97
0.16
255
0.97
2.03
489
,rksheet 3 Shared ..ane Cal_ lat_ons
hared Lane Caloulat-zrs
'o:ement 3 9 1]
;vph)
^.ovement Caoaci_v
Shared Lane Capacity
II I
1 II
II I
40
439
594
26
831
4orksheet 9 -Computation of effect of flared minor street approaches
Movement
10 12
sep 489 891
7olume 40 26
Delay 13.0 9.2
sep 0.14 0.07
sep +1 1.14 1.07
round (Qsep +1) 1 1
1 1
594
SLS sep 1379
2
.. act 1379
Worksheet 10 delay, queue length. and LOS
Movement 1 4 7 3 9 10
II
II I
I 11 I
v(vph) 10 66
C m(vph) 1232 1379
v/c 0.01 0.05
95% queue length
Control Delay 7.8 7.7
Los a A
Approach Delay 7.7
Approach LOS A
•
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
at: Eric Tuin
__section: Cerise Ranch / Highway 32
_zunt Da:e: 12-27-99
7_me Period: P.M. Peak
-..__-Se:: :.... 0__en:a:ion: Ea5_-Wes: Ma Si.
doiume laza:
.,ove..._..:s: _ 2 5 5 17
10lame: 23 521 1131 43 25 17
=3: 23 521 1131 43 25 17
-•. 1.70 -.00 1.00 1.27 1.70 1.00
2.77 3.05 3.05 3.33 7.73 3.07
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
walk speed:
t Blockage:
Median Type: TWLTL
vehicles: 3
?1. .d approach Movements:
# Cf vehicles: Northbound 0
Y of Vehicles: Southbound
Lane usage f:- movements 1,2a3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
_ 7 R
Lane 3
0
N N
Channelized:
Grade: 0.00
N N Y N
Lane usage for movements 4,S&6 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
N Y N N Y N N N Y
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
N N N N N N N N N
Channelized:
Grade: 0.00
..are usage for movements 10,11E.12 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
L R L T
R
Lane 3
L T R
1110 y N Y N N N N N N
3.33
:ata for CompuzIng _f'__ot of ..__a,/ to Major S: --_t 'ienic_es:
Eastbound westbound
:::armed ln volume, major on v2^_oles. 0 0
ared In volume, major _- /e.^._o_es: 0 0
_a_ _low rate, major on ve^1__es: :70 1700
S3: flow rate, ma -or __ ven1__-S: 1700 .700
,umber Lanes. 2 2
�ength of study period, hrs: 1.00
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation.
_ritical Gap Calculations:
Movement 1 10
12
t c,base
• c,hv
• by
: It
• ,T:
1 stage
2 stage
stage
2 stage
4.1
2.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
7.5
2.0
0.00
0.2
0.00
0.7
3.9
2.0
0.00
0.1
0.00
0.0
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 1.00 0.00
4.1
4.1
6.3 2.9
5.3
Follow Uo 7:71e CaloulazIons:
.ovemen 1 17
•2
• f,base
• f,HV
? by
f
2.2
1.0
0.00
2.2
3.5
1.0
0.00
3.5
3.3
1.0
0.00
3.3
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9 12
_onflicting Flows 591
Potential Capacity 456
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00
Movement Capacity 456
Probability of Queue free St. 0.96
0 2: LT from Major St.
4 1
C .icting Flows 1224
Potential Capacity 577
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00
Movement Capacity 577
Probability of Queue free St. 0.95
40rksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance
TH from Minor St.
- First Stage
8 11
_:n_`-c::'.g -lows
?::e.^.::3. C3p3c::y
'tides --'3.^. :-1p :3.-:_ Facto
2.ac. Ad:. factdr due to impeding mvmnd
Cacadity 3: --__ .5:.
577
505
1.70
7.35
4 3 0
. ; 7
1181
266
1.00
1.00
266
1.00
?3-_ _ Seconal :age
_o..--_c-_r:g Flcw3
_ __..:.3. :'a:_ ac::'%
.2d_0_--3 n impedance Facto=
_3p. Adj. facto: due to impeding iri nn:
': ✓emec.t Capacity
_..24
:54
1.00
1.00
254
577
505
1.00
0.35
480
Parc 3- Single Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Zap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
1901 1758
81 86
1.00 1.00
0.95 0.95
77 82
Result for 2 stage process;
Probability of eue free St.
0.97
2.71
214
1.00
0.97
0.46
247
1.00
Nor.<s..eet 7b - Computat:o.. of :he - Two-stage gao acceptance
- from>+._..Cr St. 7 10
?3__ _ First Stage
Conflicting Flows 577 1181
Potential Capacity 530 258
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 1.00
Movement Capacity 505 258
?art 2- Second Stage
Conflicting Flows 591 317
Potential Capacity 522 718
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0:96 0.95
Movement Capacity 503 683
Part 3- Single Stage
•licting Flows 1168 1498
e ntial Capacity 190 115
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 0.95
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 0.96
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.96
Movement Capacity 176 111
Result for 2 stage process:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.97 0.97
1.10 0.26
396 243
4orkshee: 3 Shared Lane C31=u_at_3ns
Shared Lane Calculations
.tovement
3 3 10
11 1
11 1
11 1
vph) 25
movement Capacity 243
Shared Lane Capacity 304
17
456
Worksheet 9 -Computation of effect of flared minor street approaches
Movement
10 12
C sep 243 456
Volume 25 17
Delay 21.2 13.2
Q sep 0.15 0.06
sep +1 1.15 1.06
round (Qsep +1) _ 1
1
Sl , see
C act
304
703
2
703
Worksheet 12 delay queue length, and LCS
Movement 4 3 9 10 11 12
I 11 1
1 11 1
1 11 1
v(vph) 29 42
C m(vph) 577 703
v/c 0.05 0.06
95% queue length
Control Delay 11.6 10.4
LOS B B
Approach Delay 10.4
Approach LOS B
•
HCS: Unsigralized Intersections Release 3.1b
II -
t: Eric Tuin
::ct section: Cerise Ranch / Highway 32
cunt Date: 12-27-93
2e__cd: 2220 AM PEAK
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
..._erne.= ..___..C3=_Jn. 3asz-sties_ oda;__ __.
Volume lata:
..,,emen _5. 2 3 22
:lume: 10 1534 332 _4 40 25
i?R: 12 1534 332 14 40 25
.. 1.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.05 0.05 2.00 0.00
?edestrian Volume Data:
lovements:
?low:
lane widch:
4a1t speed:
Blockage:
40
n Type: TWLTL
vehicles: 3
approach Movements:
rt o_ vehicles: Northbound
= of vehicles: Southbound 2
..an_ usage fp_ movements 1,213 a^, roach :
:ane , _.ane 2 Lane 3
L _ R L 7 ? T R
Y D7
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
N N
Lane usage for moveme.lts 4,5&6 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach:
40 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
N N N N N N N N N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
_ane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L _ R L T ?. L T R
10 Y N Y N N N N N N
:han..e__zed:
.rade. 3.73
`ata - --om_ --'; 7".-- Jf De_av to Major S--”- Ve.._c1es:
Eastbound gyres -bound
_hared lh volume, major th vehicles: 0 0
Shared In volume, major _- vehicles: 0 0
Sat flow rate. major _.. vehicles: 1703 1700
:a_ __ow rate, major _t ._.._--es. 1700 1700
,_.,...__ o_ mato-_ lanes: _ 2
:engch of study period, hrs: 1.00
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation.
_ritical Gap Calhulations:
Movement 1 10
12
c,base
t c,hv
? by
�g.
_ 1..
t c:,T:
1 stage
2 stag=
1 -age
2 stage
4.1
2.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
7.5
2.0
0.00
0.2
0.00
0.7
6.9
2.0
0.00
0.1
0.00
0.0
0.00 3.00 0.00
3.00 1.00 0.00
4.1
4.1
0.3 4.9
5.3 5.9
Follow Ca__.._3__ons:
• _meat 1 10
12
- :,bas=_
• f,HV
P by
• f
2.2
1.0
0.00
2.2
3.5
1.0
0.00
3.5
3.3
1.0
0.00
3.3
Worksheet 5 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9 12
Conflicting Flows 191
Potential Capacity 825
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00
Movement Capacity 825
Probability of Queue free St. 0.97
2: LT from Major St.
4 1
.icting Flows 396
Po..ential Capacity 1174
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00
Movement Capacity 1174
Probability of Queue free St. 0.99
gorksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance
TH from Minor St. 9 11
First Stage
_cnfiicting .lows
-ot_nt_3_ =apat'_
.edes___3:: 'dance F3__.. -
_so. Adj=a::.CL du_ _o :3:;
1C'.eme..= :3Cacit
_obab' ---. o: Queeuee free S_.
1604
166
3.33
1
392
616
1.00
1.20
616
_.00
=art Second Stage
lows
.ot_n_13' Capacity
=...es__-3n L.^' ed3nCe Fact.._
=3p Ad; factor due to Impeding =an:
N.!ovement Capacity
335
6.
1.03
607
1604
165
1.00
3.99
165
?art 3- Single Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cao. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Mo•:ement Capacity
2000 1986
61 62
1.00 1.00
0.99 0.99
60 61
It
for 2 stage process:
411111
t
Probability of Queue free St.
0.97
0.20
159
1.00
0.97
5.36
159
1.00
Computation of,":" ..+_ .wc-stage gap acceptance
0=en 4. IT from M:..o_ S=. _ 0
Part First Stage
Conflic:_ng Flows 1604 382
Potential Capacity 153 665
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 1.00
Movement Capacity 152 665
?art 2- Second Stage
Conflicting Flows 191 812
Potential Capacity 828 402
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0:97 0.99
Movement Capacity 802 399
3- Single Stage
do
licting Flows 1795 1194
1 atial Capacity 73 182
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 0.99
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 0.99
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.99
Movement Capacity 70 181
2esult for 2 stage process:
0.97
0.11
147
0.97
2.23
374
_rks^eet 3 Shared lane =a_:'�'-aticns
,:tared _.ane Ca__...' -a_ -_ns
3 3 10
vph)
'!ovement Capacity
Shared Lane Capacity
40
374
477
325
Worksheet 9 -Computation of effect of flared minor street approaches
Movement
10 12
C sep 374 825
7olume 40 26
Delay 15.8 9.5
sep 0.13 0.07
set) +1 1.13 1.07
round (Qsep +1) 1 1
1 1
111/1 477
SL . sep 1199
2
act 1199
Worksheet 10 de_ay,qu_.._ length, and Lis
Movement
4 7 3 9 10 __ 12
11
11
v(vph) 10 66
C m(vph) 1174 1199
vic 0.01 0.06
951 queue length
Control Delay 8.1 8.2
LOS A A
Approach Delay 3.2
Approach LOS A
•
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
k. ;t: Eric Tuin
_...._rsection: Cerise Ranch / Highway 32
runt Date: 12-27-99
:'_me Period: 2020 PM PEAK
^.-�-5�"-• .. ntal-=n. East-West baa; .. S:.
-..-_-_ Volume Data:
_:ements.
2 5 10 12
..lame: 23 713 1535 43 25 17
=FR: 23 '13 1535 43 25 17
-_. 1.03 1.33 1.00 1.0: 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.00 0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
Blockage:
an Type: TWLTL
vehicles: 3
FL_ 4d approach Movements:
• _f vehicles: Northbound 0
• OL vehicles: SOat.^.bCu.^.d 2
Lane usage for movements 1,2E,3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
R R R
Channelized:
Grade:
0.00
Lane usage for movements 4,5&5 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
T R L R L T R
N Y N N Y N N N Y
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach:
• Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
N N N N N N N N N
Channelized:
Grade:
0.00
_ane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L _ R L T R L T R
4111 Y
:hannelized: N
.rade. 2.00
:ata for Comp t_ . .. - of .relay to ]4a30: J`•-��- •Jn�'•1..-�3.
Eastbound Westbound
;hared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0
Shared In volume, major __ vehicles: 0 0
Sat flow rat_, major th vehicles: 1700 1700
;3t flow raze. major rt vehicles: 1700 1700
of ^3; _ > » .._,^,ugh Lanes: 2 2
.ength of study period, hrs: 1.00
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation.
critical Gap Calculations:
Movement 1 10 12
t ..,base
= c,hv
2 by
leg
t It
t L;,T:
1 stage
2 s=age
stage
2 stage
4.1
2.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
7.5
2.0
0.00
0.2
0.00
0.7
6.9
2.0
0.00
0.1
0.00
0.0
3.00 0.00 0.00
3.00 1.00 0.00
4.1
4.1
5.3 5.9
Follow Up Time :alcula___-s:
7.Tovement 10
t f,base
• f,H'1
P by
t f
2.2
1.0
0.00
2.2
3.5
1.0
0.00
3.5
3.3
1.0
0.00
3.3
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9 12
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
818
323
1.00
323
0.95
ill 2: LT from Major St.
4 1
C icting Flows 1679
2o....ncial Capacity 387
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00
Movement Capacity 387
Probability of Queue free St. 0.93
orksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance
TH from Minor St.
1111 First Stage
8 11
inflicting Flows
=tentia1 Capacity
edestrian ImoeCance Factor
3p. .. facto_ due to :aped'' -ng meant
.,?me.^.= Capacity
_oba .1: o: 2,free St.
774
411
1.00
:.33
331
_.00
1636
17.0
1.00
_.00
150
1.00
art 2- Second 3:age
Flows
:--..tia. C3pac:-
ediS-__3. edan_e c3_ -or
3p. Ad]. factor due to Impeding =runt
ovement Capacity
157.9 774
1 5 3 411
1.30 1.00
1.00 0.93
153 381
arc 3- Single Stage
'onflicting Flows
otential Capacity
edestrian Impedance Factor
'ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnc
ovement Capacit
2453
31
1.00
0.93
29
2410
33
1.00
0.93
31
.es : for 2 Stage process:
C
rooahility of Queue free St.
0.97
3.68
119
1.00
0.97
0.37
151
1.00
iorksneet 'b - 2omputation of tr.e effect of Two-stage gap acceptance
.rep 4 __ from :..c_ St. 13
'art Firs: Stage
:onflicting Flows 774 1635
?otential Capacity 421 147
?edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
:ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 1.00
•tovement Capacity 390 147
?arc 2- Second Stage
:onflicting Flows 818 415
?otential Capacity 399 641
?edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Zap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.93
Movement Capacity 378 594
2 Single Stage
t
C cting Flows 1592 2051
20 pial Capacity 100 49
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.93 0.93
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.94 0.94
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 0.94
Movement Capacity 89 47
zesult for 2 stage process:
•
0.97
1.15
238
0.97
0.18
142
;or.csheet 3 Shared Lane Ca_ou_at:ors
Shared Lane Calculations
3 9 10
12
vp ! 25
'.!cv men: Capacity 142
Shared Lane Capacity 133
17
323
Worksheet 9 -Computation of effect of flared minor street approaches
Kovement
10 12
sep 142 323
Jolume 25 17
Delay 35.8 15.8
sep 0.25 0.08
]
sep +1 1.25 1.08
round (Qsep +1) 1 1
1111/
sep
act
1
1
133
465
2
465
Worksheet 10 de1ay,queue length, and LOS
>!ovemen
4 7 3 3 10 11 12
11 1
1 11 I
v(vph) 29 42
C m(vph) 387 465
v/c 0.07 0.09
95% queue length
Control Delay 15.0 13.5
LOS C S
Approach Delay 13.5
Approach LOS B
•
•
APPENDIX B
•
ite Code : 8
-11111pet: DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
- set: SH -82
Counter Measures
Movements by: Primary
PAGE: 1
FILE: DAKOSH82
DATE: 10/21/97
iie From North From East From South From West Vehicle
egin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total
6:30 2 0 1 1 46 3 0 0 0 0 271 4 328
6:45 0 0 3 4 46 0 0 0 0 0 351 1 405
4R TOTAL 2 0 4 5 92 3 0 0 0 0 622 5 733
7:00 AM 1 0 1 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 278 0 328
7:15 4 0 0 4 80 0 0 0 0 0 253 0 341
7:30 1 0 2 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 241 0 333
7:45 0 0 5 1 102 0 0 0 0 0 256 0 364
iR TOTAL 6 0 8 5 319 0 0 0 0 0 1028 0 1366
8:00 AM 1 0 1 1 94 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 288
8:15 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 215 0 325
Break
4:00 PM 2 0 5 13 223 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 359
4:15 0 0 0 1 268 0 0 0 0 0 104 1 374
4:30 0 0 1 4 279 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 382
0 0 2 2 292 0 0 0 0 0 100 2 398
AL 2 0 8 20 1062 0 0 0 0 0 418 3 1513
JO PM 0 0 2 2 295 0 0 0 0 0 116 3 418
5:15 2 0 2 1 285 0 0 0 0 0 121 2 413
5:30 0 0 1 1 283 0 0 0 0 0 103 2 390
5:45 1 0 3 2 275 0 0 0 0 0 144 2 427
HR TOTAL 3 0 8 6 1138 0 0 0 0 0 484 9 1648
DAY TOTAL 14 0 29 37 2815 3 0 0 0 0 2958 17 5873
Site Code : 8
,
reef: DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
Beet: SH -82
Counter Measures
Moveaents by: Privary
PAGE: 1
FILE: DAKOSH82
DATE: 10/21/97
•
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM
DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ...
FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
Horth 7:00 AM 0.70 6 0 8 14 43 0 57
East 7:30 AM 0.90 2 395 0 397 1 99 0
South 7:30 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West 6:30 AM 0.82 0 1153 5 1158 0 i100 0
Entire Intersection
North 6:45 AM 0.75 6 0 6 12 50 0 50
East 0.76 8 263 0 271 3 97 0
South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West 0.80 0 1123 1 1124 0 5100 0
269
SH -82
1.
DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
1
6
0
L 12
1123 1124
N
W--h—E
S
8
271 263
L
0
0
0
0
DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
ite Code : 8
-S street: DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
et: SH -82
Counter Measures
MoveIents by: Pri.ary
PAGE: 1
FILE: DAK0SH82
DATE: 10/21/97
•
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
OIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ...
FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
North 5:00 PM 0.69 3 0 8 11 27 0 73
East 4:45 PM 0.98 6 1155 0 1161 1 99 0
South 4:45 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West 5:00 PM 0.84 0 484 9 493 0 98 2
North 5:00 PM 0.69
East 0.96
South 0.00
West 0.84
SH -82
9
Entire Intersection
3 0 8 11
6 1138 0 1144
0 0 0 0
0 484 9 493
DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
1
3
0
L 11
484 493
of
•
8
27 0 73
1 99 0
0 0 0
0 98 2
N
Wf{
s
6
1144 1138
0
0
L
0
DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
0
SH -82'
•
Counter Measures
*** Weekly Summary for week of October 19, 1997 *** Page 1
*****************************************************************************
Data File : M1097001.PRN
Station : 000000002019 Lane(s) : 1
Identification : 000000002019 Direction : Westbound
City/Town County : GARFIELD/EAGLE
_ocation : SH -82 W/0 DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
*******************************************************************************
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wkday Daily
Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg.
01:00 31 31 22
02:00 21 21 15
03:00 13 13 9
04:00 19 19 14
05:00 24 24 17
06:00 48 48 34
07:00 154 154 110
08:00 358 358 256
09:00 429 429 306
10:00 415 415 296
11:00 440 440 314
12:00 459 459 328
:00 517 517 369
00 491 491 351
)0 568 568 406
.00 822 822 587
17:00 1153 1153 824
18:00 1161 1161 829
19:00 941 941 672
20:00 324 382 353 252
21:00 163 232 198 141
22:00 160 163 162 115
23:00 103 128 116 83
24:00 70 80 75 54
Totals 820 9049 8967 6405
*******************************************************************************
% Avg Wkday
Avg Day
AM Peak Hr
AM Count
PM Peak Hr
PM Count
9.1 100.9
12.8 141.3
12:00
459
20:00 18:00
324 1161
4******************************************************************************
•
Counter Measures
411 *** Weekly Summary for week of October 19, 1997 *** Page 8
4***************************************************************************
uata File : M1097005.PRN
Station : 000000002010 Lane(s) : 1
Identification : 000000002010 Direction : Eastbound
City/Town County : GARFIELD/EAGLE
Location : SH -82 W/0 DAKOTA SUBDIVISION ACCESS
*******************************************************************************
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wkday Daily
Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg.
01:00 22 22 16
02:00 11 11 8
03:00 12 12 9
04:00 28 28 20
05:00 40 40 29
06:00 233 233 166
07:00 1181 1181 844
08:00 1118 1118 799
09:00 858 858 613
10:00 597 597 426
11:00 502 502 359
12:00 470 470 336
13:00 464 464 331
00 440 440 314
00 465 465 332
00 463 463 331
,7:00 466 519 493 352
18:00 516 595 556 397
19:00 451 445 448 320
20:00 279 342 311 222
21:00 235 224 230 164
22:00 170 203 187 133
23:00 99 113 106 76
24:00 45 58 52 37
Totals 2261 9403 9284 6631
*******************************************************************************
% Avg Wkday
74 Avg Day
AM Peak Hr
AM Count
24.4 101.3
34.1 141.8
07:00
1181
PM Peak Hr 18:00 18:00
PM Count 516 595
*******************************************************************************
•
•
•
•
VANIERCREEN HOMES
CARIIELO CC/UNIV. COLORADO
CERISE RANCH
HIGHWAY ACCESS
PROPOSED MPRovMEN 3
IKiI COLRETRY EMONEERNCL NC
on CDOPFA AVENUE
GLENWOOD E'fi100, CO 91001
P1-11910) 915-9670 FX1920) 945-2555
DL 5
DR. CPI
EPI
NQ
DAIE
CK_ NOE
DAZE 12-7-99
(KC-RD/PLAN
HE NSlON
0Y
99054.01
CERISE RANCH, GARFIELD COUNTY
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
DECEMBER 15, 1999
2391-293-00-081
Stirling, Rebecca R.
704 Skipper Lane
Carbondale. CO 81623
2391-294-04-027
2391-294-04-011
2391-294-04-012
2391-294-04-029
Stirling, John M.
704 Skipper Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-294-00-079
Levitt, Molly G.
P.O. Box 414740
Kansas City, MO 641414740
• 2391-283-00-186
Levitt, Thomas W.
P.O. Box 414740
Kansas City, MO 64141-4740
2391-283-00-237
Glen. Stanley Revocable Trust
Agreement
cio Jeffrey Glen Trustee
90 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004-2205
2391-283-00-238
TRM Corporation of Florida
D.B.A. TRM Corporation of Colorado
Drawer 700
Jensen Beach, FL 34958-0700
2391-283-00-239
Yager, David
2809 Boston Street #410
Baltimore, MD 21224
2391-284-074
McMechen, Kenneth D.
P.O. Box B
El Jebel, CO 81628
2391-332-00-027
Public Service Company of Colorado
Attn: Property & Local Taxes
1225 17th Street, Ste. 400
Denver, CO 80202-5534
2391-332-01-011
Thunder River Construction, Inc.
0795 Kings Row Avenue
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-01-012
Haines, Robert S. & Helen J.
21 Dakota Court
Carbondale, CO 81623-1630
2391-332-01-013
Sapp, Christopher W. & Fisher, Carolyn
M. (Jt)
0292 Rabbit Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-01-014
Kriz, Don
120 Virginia Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 816014148
2391-332-01-001
Eppstein, Michael D. & Laurie (Jt)
996 Cottonwood Lane
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
2391-332-00-023
Dakota Meadows Open Space
2391-332-03-006
Klahn, Janice J. & Leslie H., Jr.
0204 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-005
Steppe, Norman, Jr. & Jackson, Linda J.
202 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
Cerise Ranch Adjacent Owners Page 2
• December 15, 1999
99054.01
•
•
2391-332-03-012
Winograd. Felicia & Gerold. Rolando
198 Dakota Meadows Drive, Unit 5-B
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-011
Cakmis. Peter DDS
6080 Alpenrose Avenue
Jacksonville, FL 32256
2391-332-03-020
Matthews, Susan P.
184 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-019
Milkovich, James B. & Marta K. (Jt)
182 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623-1631
2391-332-03-028
Wyman, Christine P. & Kenneth G. (Jt)
166 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623-1631
2391-332-03-027
Formica, Carolyn
164 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623-1631
2391-332-03-026
Biggers, Ronald L. & Pamela G.
Britton
0152 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-025
King, Ida M.
0150 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-024
Ohlrich, Patricia A. & James A.
140 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-023
Belle. Rita Veronica, Trust DTD
3/19/90
7649 East Vista Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85250
2391-332-03-048
Elias. Barbara A. Carbondale, CO 81623
0451 Stagecoach Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-332-03-047
Hurt, Dale S. & Julie K.
0132 Dakota Meadows Drive
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-333-00-033
Arnold. Robert & Gloria H.
2542 Emma Road
Basalt, CO 81621-9118
2391-333-00-005
Alpine Animal Hospital P.C.
17776 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-333-00-030
Zelnick, Stanley J. & Billie L.
17698 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-333-00-031
Howard, Cheryl J.
17696 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-333-00-002
Longstreth, James E.
P.O. Box 28029
El Jebel, CO 81628-8029
2391-333-00-001
Bauldridge, Bruce & Diane E.
17450 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Cerise Ranch Adjacent Owners Page 3
• December 15, 1999
99054.01
2391-321-00-044
Vagneur. Wayne & Louis M.
60 Flying Fish Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-321-00-043
Ilgen, Jack D. & Eloise H.
17352 Highway 82. Apt. C
Carbondale, CO 81623-9560
2391-321-00-016
Balderson, Dylan 1/3 & Spiro,
Jacqueline 2/3
P.O. Box 10639
Aspen, CO 81612
2391-321-01-003
Work, Horace H.
P.O. Box 6929
Snowmass Village, CO 81515-6929
2391-321-01-002
Rudd. Wayne G. & Susan J.
132 Park Avenue
Basalt, CO 81621-9338
2391-321-01-001
McCarthy, Jerry R. & Betty K.
P.O. Box 5133
Snowmass Village, CO 81615-5133
2391-321-00-013
Work, Horace
P.O. Box 6929
Snowmass Village, CO 81615-6929
2391-321-00-029
Palmer, Michael Henry
138 Flying Fish Road
Carbondale, CO 81623-9540
2391-321-00-028
Faber, Bradley A. & Teresa L.
174 Flying Fish Road
Carbondale, CO 81623-9540
2391-321-00-041
Davies. Fredric A. & Francis M.A.
P.O. Box K
Aspen, CO 81612-7412
2391-322-00-032
Obuhanick, Peter H. & Linda H.
P.O. Box 229
Aspen, CO 81612-0229
2391-322-00-008
Englund, Kathleen G.
2205 Shalimar Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80915-1024
2391-322-01-001
Hire, C.J. & Phyllis
345 South Mill
Lexington, OH 44904
2391-322-00-006
Desjarlais, Gerard E.
P.O. Box QQ
Basalt, CO 81621-0680
2391-322-00-046
Cerise, Dennis N. & Patricia E.
16724 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-322-00-025
Ulrych, Julian A.
16704 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623-9570
2391-293-00-082
Carlson, Portia A.
Carlson, Eric B.
Sterrett, Bailey D.
Carson, Leif
26575 Routt County Road 33A
Steamboat Springs, CO 80487
1/2
•
Cerise Ranch Adjacent Owners Page 4
December 15, 1999
99054.01
EAGLE COUNTY
2391-331-00-012
Public Service Company of Colorado
1225 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
2391-331-00-002
Edwards, Joseph E. Jr. & Linda B.
14 Fender Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-331-07-001
Dakota Partners L.L.C.
352A Beaver Dam Circle
Vail, CO 81657
2391-331-05-001
Temmen, Pam
• P.O. Box 1068
Aspen, CO 81621
2391-331-05-002
Hall, Yvonne & Stan
0515 Holland Hills
Basalt. CO 81621
2391-331-05-003
Roos, Benjamin & Elizabeth
5 Dakota Ct.
Carbondale, CO 81623
2391-331-05-004
Hiltner, Jeffrey A.
405 Park Avenue Suite Al
Basalt, CO 81621-9367
•
•
•
•
l'i1 III! fill If" if 1111(f11 �ir1 lrff '1
,lilt 9 i19 1 11141 it �r( ot11 u!il
�� �- �T' X11 t 9j:. • ! I-..
ti f r:Ir4* . I
s b
!ill !III
sr ► II �( �(� (� (I: ill
r j r 11 r ri et tri 0!
!1
133 1O.Y31
r
•- r. c • Fora •
.a
•..r.. co Pas
.iu: 1M
3M. . lu. w 300
«. un
M.•... Cu
afif
IdAt
7•Y
enfl
n
m
m
D
Z
n
2
1:14
)1...212
4 Y M MYY
lwl c.4"101_010
JJ.1 311.410.0.1
141. Ali/) 30)3.33
01
r v (
Cow....CU
j;
1
I t
w'.
111.1 Ws/1.1,W
•
(311111 11'3.0)1111030
3 tqa.v0
ww.0• 1.a •
030 -W -6 N
1-i• w
3.C•,[11. 111» W
i. 1.13 11110.) Y30• 003 r
• m, mike
.11µ41r
•
1c... YJ -N•
lLW mU 111.V341 0341
3.1 1••0.00 1.3.00
1ua-30-.11-.K3
WINTERGREEN HOMES
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
CERISE RANCH
HIGHWAY ACCESS
PROPOSED p.PROVIYEN S
DCS. CPI
OR. EPT
CK. ROE
H0.
DA IE
49
081E 17-7-99
FUE: REVPLAN