Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationRECEIVED SEP 2 4 2002 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Prepared for: Aspen Valley Land Trust Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application Date: September 2002 Submitted to Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Prepared by: TG Malloy Consulting, LLC 181 Orchard Lane Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Property Owner: Snowmass Land Company 0021 Burnt Mountain Circle Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Project Team Owners: Snowmass Land Company P.O. Box 6119 Phone: (970) 923-2880 Applicant: Aspen Valley Land Trust 320 Main Street, Suite 204 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Phone: (970) 963-8440 Planner: TG Malloy Consulting, LLC 181 Orchard Lane Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: (970) 945-0832 Engineer: Sopris Engineering Contact Person: Yancy Nichol 502 Main Street, Suite A3 Carbondale, CO 81623 Phone: (970) 704-0311 Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application List of Figures 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site Survey/Existing Conditions Map 3 Sketch Plan (11" by 17") 4 Land Use Map 5 Mule Deer Habitat (WRIS Map) 6 Elk Habitat (WRIS Map) List of Attachments 1 Proof of Ownership 2 Authorization Letter 3 List of Adjacent Property Owners 4 Deed of Conservation Easement 5 Preliminary Engineering Report and Attachments 6 Proof of Physical Water Supply/Documentation for Off -Site Wells 7 Proof of Physical Water Supply/Documentation for On -Site Wells 8 Augmentation Plan 9 USDA — RCS Soil Designations and Tables 10 Fire District Petition for Inclusion 11 Outline of Conservation Easement Guidelines 12 Outline of Architectural Guidelines 13 Noxious Weed Control Letter 14 Site Plan and Road Design Drawing Set (See separate 24" by 36" drawing set) Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application Purpose The purpose of this application is to provide the necessary information for "sketch plan" review, as outlined in Section 3.00 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations, for a proposed 26 -lot subdivision located west of the intersection of County Road 115 and Cattle Creek Road on Missouri Heights. The subject property is known as the Lower Laurence Ranch and contains approximately 480 acres. Background The subject property is one of two parcels that together have been known as the Laurence Ranch, which has been an ongoing agricultural operation for over 100 years. Until recently, the ranch had been operated by Roger Laurence, who put the property up for auction in 2000, in part to satisfy estate taxes due as a result of the death of his father some years earlier. The Ranch was comprised of two large, non- contiguous parcels (see Figure 1). The North Parcel consists of approximately 1,300 acres and is located just east of the Consolidated Reservoir. The South Parcel, which is the subject of this application, contains 478.7 acres. The North parcel is undeveloped while the South Parcel has been improved with several buildings and fences and has been used as the ranch homestead. Both parcels contain valuable wildlife habitat, open space and agricultural uses. After a deal with the highest bidder from the auction fell through, the Aspen Valley Land Trust (AVLT) purchased the South Parcel. The Laurence Ranch was offered for auction as separate parcels ranging in size from 35 to 200 acres. Bids were offered on all of the separate parcels during the auction. The winning bid was submitted by someone wanting to purchase the property in total and whose bid exceeded the cumulative bids on the separate parcels. Given the fact that there were offers on all of the separate parcels at the auction, AVLT recognized the imminent threat that the property would be divided and sold, thus destroying its wildlife, open space and agricultural values. AVLT hopes to find a conservation buyer willing to purchase the North Parcel and keep the 1,300 -acre property essentially in its current state with the right to construct a single home site. The South Parcel is proposed to be subdivided under a limited development scheme preserving a majority of the property for its historic uses. With this strategy in mind, AVLT solicited proposals from land development companies and entered into an agreement to sell the South Parcel to and entity owned by the Snowmass Land Company provided they would develop the property under a cluster approach with a small number (22-26) of residential lots and to place a conservation easement over the balance of the property. The conservation easement has been executed and a copy of this document is included with this application. Under this agreement, AVLT retained responsibility to process the necessary development application through the County. This is a unique partnership for the Roaring Fork Valley and, if successful, could become a valuable model for the preservation of important agricultural lands and open space in the region. Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 1 Property Description The subject property contains 478.7 acres and is located in the Missouri Heights area approximately 5 miles northeast of Carbondale (see Vicinity Map/Figure 1). The property is located to the north and west of County Road 113. County Road 115 runs along the north side of the site. The property is approximately 3 Y4 miles north of Highway 82 along Catherine Store Road (County Road 100) just past the intersection with Cattle Creek Road. The property abuts BLM land to the west and south as shown on Figure 1. A portion of the BLM land is designated as the Fisher Creek Special Management Area. This area is open for limited public use and includes a parking area and several trails. One of these trails runs along the west property line of the Ranch. The privately owned lands that abut the property on the north and east are currently utilized for agricultural purposes. Uses in the surrounding area are primarily agricultural though there are other residential subdivisions nearby including the Panorama Ranch and High Aspen Ranch subdivisions. Figure 2 is a survey map showing the existing conditions on the property. Existing development on the property consists of the ranch homestead, which was comprised of two farmhouses, a barn and an historic 1800's log house. The westernmost ranch house, which had been vacant for years and was in poor and potentially dangerous condition, was removed in July of this year. The other main house remains and is O{i currently occupied. The historic house is currently vacant. There are also four decreed ponds on the property that are used for irrigation. These ponds contain water, as available, out of the Consolidated Reservoir. There are also numerous ranch roads and fences on the property. The terrain of the property is rolling and includes one large knoll located on the south end of the Ranch. There is also a steep cliff along the southwest edge of the property, which forms a natural boundary between the Ranch and BLM land to the southwest. Vegetation on the property is primarily field grass interspersed with areas of sage and sparse scrub oak and pinion juniper stands. The south side of the knoll is covered with a moderately dense pinion juniper stand. The current owner resumed haying operations this season and one cutting of hay was produced this summer. Prior to the current owner purchasing property, the Ranch had not been hayed for the last two or three seasons. Project Description Figure 3 is a reduced copy of the Sketch Plan Map and shows the development scheme for the property. The plan includes a total of 26 new lots covering approximately 155.6 acres. The rest of the ranch will be common open space for the use of the lot owners. The common open space will continue to be ranched. A homeowners association will be established to maintain the open space, roads and other common facilities of the subdivision. Figure 4 is as map illustrating the breakdown of the lots, roads and common open space. Table 1 shows the unit and acreage breakdown for the project. Table 1 Unit and Acreage Breakdown Units Acreage Proposed Lots 26 155.58 Common Open Space 1* 305.25 Roads N/A 17.87 Total 27 478.70 * Represents the existing house to remain as ranch manager's unit. Ranch at Coulter Creek 2 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application The gross density of the project (not including the existing house which will be used as a ranch manager's unit) is approximately one unit per 18.4 acres, which is significantly below that allowed under the County's Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. The subject property is zoned Agricultural Residential Rural Density (A/R/RD). This zone district allows one unit per two acres or approximately 239 units, given the acreage of the property. The proposed density is approximately one -ninth the allowed density in the zone district. The subject property is designated on the Future Land Use Map in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan for low-density residential use. The recommended density in this land use category is ten acres or more per dwelling unit. Using this standard, the property could accommodate approximately 48 dwelling units, nearly twice the proposed number of units. The proposed lots have been located to minimize visibility from the surrounding area while also minimizing encroachment into historically irrigated areas. To accomplish this, the lots are arranged in several clusters as shown on the Site Plan. In general terms, the lots could be described as being located around the perimeter of the agricultural areas of the property. The Site Plan includes a table itemizing the acreage of each proposed lot. The lots range in size from just over four acres to just over eleven acres. Most of the lots are located in relatively open areas with little vegetation. The one exception to this is Lot 19, which is located in an area of moderately dense trees. Lots 18 through 22 are located around the top of the knoll in the southern portion of the property. Of these lots, only 20, 21 and 22 are very visible. Lots 18 and 19 are located in a draw and out of view from most locations. To reduce the visibility of Lots 20 thro g 2 , the building envelopes are set back from the edge of the slope. This leaves ample room to install additional landscaping, if necessary, to further screen the houses from the north and/or east. Lots 1 thous 17 ,have been located along the edge of the cliff that overlooks Cattle Creek Road and the BLM land to the south. The building envelopes on these lots have been set back from the ridge so that a structure meeting the County's height restriction (25 feet) would not be visible from Cattle Creek Road. This setback was verified in the field and is labeled on the Site Plan as "Cattle Creek Road Viewshed Setback Line." Lots 6 through 10 are located in the interior of the property and will not be visible from off-site locations. Similarly, Lots 23 throuuh 26 are located in a draw and are well screened from most off-site locations. Lots 4 and 5 will be visible from County Road 115 as it turns to the north. However, there is existing vegetation in this area that will help screen the homes on these lots. The natural grade also provides some screening for these lots. Landscaping could also be added to provide further screening from County Road 115. Lots 1 through 3, contain the most visible building sites. These sites will be visible from County Roads 115 and 121 to the north. The view of these sites from County Road 115 is confined to a relatively short segment of the Road at a distance of over 2000 feet. Visibility of these sites from County Road 121 is from a distance of a mile or more. The building envelope on Lot 3 has been located in a depression behind an existing natural berm. This should screen all but the top 6 to 10 feet of a structure on this lot. The Lot 2 building envelope is located on an east -facing slope. This location was selected for the existing mature scrub oak vegetation located on the north side of the envelope. This vegetation will provide some screening from the north during the summer months and could be augmented to reduce the visibility of a residence. Similarly, the building envelope for Lot lis located behind an existing stand of scrub oaks that will provide screening during summer months. The proposed road system includes a loop road that utilizes two existing ranch road access drives onto County 115. The entries into the development are planned to be improved with simple fencing and landscaping. The entry area near the existing ranch homestead may be modified somewhat to Ranch at Coulter Creek 3 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application accommodate the entry landscaping. Some of the existing ranch structures will be removed, though the current plan calls for the historic structures; barn and the existing occupied ranch house to remain. A trail system is also planned for the common open space parcel though the final alignment of the trails has not yet been established. There are no plans at this point to construct any other common facilities on the property. The roads have been designed to comply with County road standards as identified in Section 9.3 of the Subdivision Regulations. Based on the anticipated trip generation and assuming traffic will be distributed in both directions on Cattle Creek Ridge Road, the estimated traffic on this road will be roughly 156 ADT. Given these assumptions, the proposed roads qualify under the "Rural Access" category in the County's Road Standards. The proposed roads have been designed with 11 -foot drive lanes and 2 -foot shoulders either side of the drive lanes. The drive lanes for the main roads are intended to have a chip & seal surface. The extended driveways that serve lots 3, 8, 24, 25, and 26 are proposed to have two 7 -foot - wide drive lanes for a total width of 14 feet. These access drives may have a gravel surface. Review Criteria Section 3.23 of the Subdivision Regulations requires compliance with Garfield County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Road Standards and Comprehensive Plan as well as other applicable state and federal regulations and policies. In the following paragraphs we discuss the project's compliance with the policies and standards contained in these documents. Where appropriate, we have included the actual language from the pertinent document for reference. This language is highlighted in bold and italic. Zoning Regulations Compliance The proposed project complies with all requirements of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution. The subject property is located in the ARRD zone district. The minimum lot area allowed in this zone district is two (2) acres. The lots proposed for the subject property are all greater than two acres in size. The acreage of all of the proposed lots is shown on the Sketch Plan (see 24" by 36" Sketch Plan drawing set). The zoning regulations also require minimum setbacks as follows: Front Yard (local streets): Rear Yard: Side Yard: 25 feet from front lot line 25 feet 10 feet or half the height of the principal building The Sketch Plan depicts building envelopes within which all residential structures and landscaping will1;4e confined. The building envelopes have been designed to comply with these setbacks. The building envelops for Lots 11 through 16 have also been located so that a 25 -foot -high building located within the envelope cannot be seen from Cattle Creek Road. The building envelopes on these lots were set back from the edge of the ridge specifically to accomplish this. In all cases, the proposed setbacks meet or exceed those required pursuant to the Zoning Resolution. The Deed of Conservation Easement executed between Aspen Valley Land Trust and the Snowmass Land Company also includes a clause requiring compliance with all development approvals granted for this property. Therefore, all conditions established by the County in connection with the subdivision approvals requested in this application will be granted the additional force of the conservation agreement. This will provide another layer of Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 4 oversight with respect to development on the property. A copy of the Deed of Conservation Easement is included as Attachment 4. The ARRD zone district also limits the height of all buildings to 25 feet. Since no buildings are proposed with this application, we believe this issue should be left to the control of the County. In exercising its authority to control the development of structures through the review and issuance of building permits, the County will require compliance with the appropriate height restriction in place at the time building permits are reviewed for each of the proposed lots. Similarly, the Zoning Resolution limits lot coverage within the ARRD zone district to 15 percent. This limitation should be enforced at the time building permits are reviewed. The Applicant is willing to accept compliance with all applicable zoning requirements as a condition of approval. Subdivision Regulations Compliance Section 3.30 and 3.40 of the Subdivision Regulations identify the sketch plan "requirements" and "supplemental information" to be considered during sketch plan review. In addition, the subdivision regulations include several broad categories of standards and criteria for which compliance must be considered. The categories include General Standards, Lot and Block Design, Streets and Roadways, Drainage, Water Supply, Sanitary Sewage Disposal, Fire Protection and Public Site and Open Spaces. Compliance with the required standards and criteria is described in the following paragraphs. Sketch Plan Requirements (Section 330) Figure 3 is the Sketch Plan map showing the existing site features and topography including existing ranch roads, irrigations ditches, water courses, ponds and structures. The topography shown on the Sketch Plan was surveyed earlier this year and shows contours at two -foot intervals. The Sketch Plan also depicts all elements of the proposed project including the location and dimensions of all proposed lots, building envelopes, road rights-of-way and easements. The Sketch Plan also shows the location of the well field and other elements of the proposed central water system. A land use break down for the project is provided in Table labove. Supplemental Information (Section 3.40) A) Source and Amount of Water Supply; Domestic water for the proposed lots is intended to be provided via a central water system, which is being designed by Sopris Engineering. Attachment 5 is a report from Yancy Nichol providing a brief description of the proposed system and the assumptions used in the design of the system. Since the proposed system will utilize an on-site well field as the source of raw water, we have provided documentation regarding wells located on the subject property and within 'A mile of the property as proof of adequate physical supply. The two off-site wells have a documented pumping rate of 15 gpm (see Attachment 6). The on-site wells were drilled with test well permits and have been tested for production and water quality. The pump test and water quality reports for these wells are provided in Attachment 7. An application for underground water rights with an augmentation plan has been filed with Water Division 5 of the District Court. A copy of the application and augmentation plan is included as Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 5 Attachment 8. We acknowledge that approval of the water rights application and a final decree of water rights will be required prior to final plat approval. B) Proposed Type of Sewage Disposal; We anticipate serving the proposed residential lots with on-site sewage treatment systems, which will require approval pursuant to the County's Independent Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. However, it is appropriate at this stage in the development review process to consider whether the subject property presents any significant or unique limitations that raise concerns about the viability of handling the waste from the proposed residential lots with on-site wastewater treatment systems. As a first step in this analysis the Septic System Constraints Map contained in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan was examined to determine if the soils in the area might be prone to complications associated with on-site wastewater disposal. The information on this map was taken from the "Geologic Hazards Identification Study" conducted by Lincoln-Devore Testing Laboratory in 1975-76 and identifies soils constraints including slow percolation, high water table and soils with high evaporite minerals. No constraints relative to septic system functioning are identified for the subject property on this map. The USDA Resource Conservation Service soil designations and interpretation tables are also provided with this application as Attachment 9. On-site wastewater treatment is also discussed in the letter of opinion prepared by Yancy Nichol of Sopris Engineering (see Attachment 5). In his letter, Mr. Nichols indicates that the type, dimension and design of on-site wastewater treatment systems (OWS) will vary based on specific conditions at each building site. Mr. Nichol also notes that he expects that most of the lots will be suitable for conventional systems and/or modified engineered systems, though a few lots may require advanced treatment components be incorporated in the design of the OWS if certain constraints are encountered. A more detailed analysis of the soils and the design for the individual system for each lot will be provided, as required, with the Building/ISDS permit application. C) U.S.D.A Soil Conservation Service soil designations, with interpretation tables attached; See Attachment 9. D) Statement assessing the impact of the proposed subdivision on the lakes, streams and topography of the site; Great care has been taken in locating the proposed lots, roads and building envelopes to accomplish a variety of objectives for this project. Among these objectives is the desire to preserve as much of the irrigated land as possible for agricultural use. Care was also taken to minimize the visibility of building sites from nearby roads and developed areas. Attempts were also made to work with existing ranch roads and landforms to accommodate the proposed roads and building sites. These factors, together with the desire to take advantage of the site's views and to provide reasonable separation between the proposed building sites, guided the development of the site plan. There are no lakes or streams located on the site. Coulter Creek is located to the east of the subject property. The proposed residential lots are not located near the Creek and no adverse impacts to Coulter Creek are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. While there are situations where a proposed lot traverses steep slopes, all new residential structures and site work will be confined to the building envelops shown on the Sketch Plan. The building envelopes Ranch at Coulter Creek 6 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application constitute approximately 50.6 acres or less than 11 percent of the total acreage of the site. The plan also includes a "ranch compound amenity area." This 8.2 -acre area is part of the common open space area but includes the existing ranch structures and the landscaping for the main entry to the subdivision. Most of the building envelopes are located on relatively flat terrain, in areas with little or no overstory vegetation and avoid steep slopes. There is one area where a proposed road traverses a small section of steep slopes. This is the section of road providing access to the knoll area at the south end of the property. The access road has been designed to comply with the County's road standards and in no case does the road exceed 12 percent in grade. The maximum grade of the road is 9.83 percent. The portion of the road that traverses steeper terrain is located in a draw on the northwest side of the knoll. As a result, the road itself is well hidden in the landscape and only portions of it are visible from the north and northwest. E) Statement assessing potential radiation hazards to the site; The applicant is unaware of any radiation on or near the subject property, nor is there any reason to suspect that radiation would be present on the property. To our knowledge, the site has not been mined at any point in the past and there do not appear to be any mine tailings present on the site. Nor is the site located in an area where any nuclear testing is known to have occurred in the past. F) Evidence that all lots and parcels created by the subdivision will have access to a public right-of- way, in conformance with the Colorado State Highway Access Code and applicable County Regulations; The subject property has access directly onto County Road 115, which abuts the property at several points along its northern boundary. The proposed subdivision road system accesses County Road 115 at two locations as shown on the Site Plan. One of these access points is the existing ranch homestead driveway. The second point is an existing ranch road access drive. Since portions of the subdivision roads traverse the common open space easements granting access for the benefit of all of the lots will be established over the proposed roads. The access easements will be referenced on the deeds for all of the lots and will be identified on the Final Plat, which will be recorded with the County. G) Anticipated source of electricity, natural gas, telephone and cable television services; Electricity and telephone service is available in the right-of-way for County Road 115. Holy Cross Energy will provide electric service and telephone service will be provided by Quest. Both Holy Cross and Quest have provided letters indicating their willing to provide service. These letters are included with the engineering report provided by Sopris Engineering (see Attachment 5). Natural gas and cable television service are not available in this area. Streets and Roadways (Section 9.30) The proposed roads fall into the Rural Access designation in the County's Road Standards, based on the anticipated trip generation (see Attachment 5). The proposed roads have been designed to comply with the Garfield County Road Standards as outlined in Section 9.35 of the Subdivision Regulations. Most of the proposed road system length is comprised of a main loop road. However, there are several spur roads with cul-de-sacs that provide access to residential lots. The design of these cul-de-sacs is discussed later in this section. The main roads will be paved with a chip -seal surface, which meets the minimum requirement of the road standards. The roads are designed with no curb or gutter. No segment of the proposed roads exceeds 10 percent in grade. Though the roads are intended to be private and will be Ranch at Coulter Creek 7 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application maintained by the homeowner's association, a fifty foot R.O.W. has been provided. This has been done to match the County Road Standards in the event the subdivision roads are ever turned over to the County. Streets and roads shall be designed so that alignments will join in a logical manner, such that adjacent road systems can be combined to form a continuous route from one area to another; The locations where the proposed subdivision roads intersect with County Road 115 are existing ranch road access points and have been chosen primarily because they are logical points to serve the proposed development scheme on the subject property. The subject property is surrounded by public lands and other agricultural uses and there are currently no roads on any of the adjacent properties with which to connect. Further, due to the ownership patterns and terrain of the lands to the west, south and east it is unlikely that there will ever be a scenario where road connections with the adjacent properties in these areas will be logical. The subject property is bordered on the south and west by BLM land and there are cliffs and steep slopes along most of this boundary. Similarly, it is unlikely that development scenarios for lands to the east of the subject property will create access roads that would be conducive to making connections with roads on the subject property. Coulter Creek and County Road 113 are located immediately to the east of the property in a relatively deep valley. There are steep slopes on either side of this valley that would make it impractical to construct access roads from the adjacent properties on either side of County Road 113. In addition, there is a narrow strip of land located between the subject property and County 113, which is owned by an adjoining property owner. This strip of land is not wide enough to accommodate development and separates the subject property from the County Road. The land to the north of the subject property could accommodate development that would have access roads intersecting with County 115 from the north. The access roads proposed for the Laurence Ranch intersect County Road 115 at locations that would allow for connections to these lands. However, since the roads on the Laurence Ranch property will not connect to any other through roads there is no benefit to making such a connection. Streets shall have the names of existing streets in the same alignment; otherwise there shall be no duplication of street names in the County; There are no streets or roads in the area of the subject property that share the same alignment as the proposed roads. The Sketch Plan Map shows the proposed road names. The applicant is not aware of any duplication with any other road names in the County. Cul-de-sac design; Due to the physical characteristics of the subject property and the conservation objectives of the project, cul-de-sacs are utilized in the road design. The Streets and Roadways standards found in the Subdivision Regulations provide specific guidelines for the design of cul-de-sacs. The code limits the length of cul- de-sacs to no more than 600 feet. However, the Code also stipulates that the County can allow longer cul- de-sacs for topographical reasons provided it can be shown that fire protection and emergency access can be accommodated as part of the longer design. The proposed road plans include two cul-de-sacs that are longer than 600 feet. One of these in referred to as Fisher Creek Lane and is located in the west end of the property and the other is called Saddle Drive and provides access to the knoll at the south end of the property. Fisher Creek lane is roughly 925 feet in length and provides access for three lots. The access for one of Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 8 these lots (Lot 8) utilizes a private driveway that extends roughly 980 feet beyond the end of the cul-de- sac. Fisher Creek Lane and the private drive extension were designed to accomplish two objectives. The first objective was to minimize the amount of irrigated land lost to road construction and the other was to minimize disturbance to steep slopes in the area on the west side of Lots 8 and 9. The proposed road and private drive follow the alignment of an existing irrigation ditch and loop around an irrigated meadow, thereby limiting encroachment into the meadow. The cul-de-sac has been designed in accordance with the County's road standards. In the event that multiple emergency vehicles were dispatched for an emergency situation on Lots 6 or 7, the terrain along the proposed access road and driveway extension would allow emergency vehicles to maneuver during times when there was no snow. Saddle Drive includes two cul-de-sacs and a private drive and provides access for a total of five lots. This road has been designed to meet County Road Standards except that the length of the road exceeds 600 feet. The area served by this road is a large knoll with few options in terms of access road alignments. The proposed road has been located in a draw that offers the least impactive route to the proposed lots. Due to the orientation of this draw, only portions of this road will be visible and from very few locations. The road has been designed with the most shallow grade possible given the terrain. In no case does the road grade exceed 10 percent. The cul-de-sacs at the end of Saddle Drive have been designed to meet or exceed County Road Standards. Drainage (Section 9.40) Drainage is addressed in the engineering report provided by Sopris Engineering (see Attachment 5). Drainage for the project will be designed in accordance with the criteria and standards included in Section 9.40 of the Subdivision Regulations. According to the engineering report the historic drainage flows and patterns on the property will not be significantly altered as a result of the proposed development scheme. As a result, no detention is required. Several culverts are planned where roadways cross natural watercourses. The location of these culverts is identified on the Sketch Plan. Fire Protection (9.70) Each of the proposed homes in the subdivision will be equipped with a sprinkler system for fire suppression. In addition, each lot will have a minimum 5,000 -gallon water storage tank. This tank will provide storage for domestic water and will also be fitted with a dry hydrant for fire fighting. Individual lot owners may opt to install a larger storage tank for firefighting and irrigation purposes. The storage tanks and dry hydrants will be designed to comply with the specifications required by the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. The subject property is located partially within the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District boundaries. The Applicant has submitted a petition to expand the District boundaries to include the balance of the property (Attachment 10). Figure 1 of the petition shows the current District boundaries as they relate to the proposed development on the property. The Fire District Board met to discuss this project on August 21s`. At that meeting, the Board directed the Applicant to work with the Fire District Staff on a number of issues and incentives before the Board can make a final decision regarding the annexation petition. As part of this process, the Applicant is considering installing a water storage tank on the subject property for Fire District use when fighting structure or wildfires in the surrounding area. In addition, a site has been identified on the subject property for a repeater antenna to be used by the Fire District to improve emergency radio communication in the region. At the time this application was prepared, the Applicant was still working with the Fire District Staff on these and other issues. More Ranch at Coulter Creek 9 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application information will be provided on this issue as it becomes available. Public Sites and Open Spaces (Section 9.80) The subdivision regulations allow the Board of County Commissioners to consider whether to seek land or cash -in -lieu of land for parks and/or schools during the subdivision review process based on several factors including the future requirements of the subdivision and its inhabitants. The proposed subdivision creates a relatively small number of lots and will result in the permanent preservation of approximately 305 acres of agricultural land and open space identified as "Common Open Space" on the Sketch Plan. This represents roughly 64 percent of the gross acreage of the property. Further, all development and landscaping on the proposed lots will be limited to the building envelopes shown on the Sketch Plan. Since the building envelopes contain approximately 50 acres, the remaining 104 acres contained in the proposed lots will remain in essentially their current state. This will have the effect of preserving nearly 420 acres of open space. This is equivalent to 87.7 percent of the total acreage. The property is located immediately adjacent to a large area of public lands owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The Fisher Creek Special Management Area, which is part of the BLM lands, abuts the subject property on the west and includes trails open for public use. The property owner will also pay the required School Site Acquisition Fee, which is due at final plat. We have calculated the School Site Acquisition Fee based on the formula in Section 9.81 of the Subdivision Regulations, since the subject property is located within the RE -1 School District. The fee calculation is based on the unimproved market value of an amount of land determined by the County and identified as the "land dedication standard." The land dedication standard for single-family residential development, as identified in the Subdivision Regulations, is 870 square feet per residential unit proposed. The fee calculation for the proposed project is as follows: Proposed residential units x 870 = Land dedication basis x unimproved market value = Cash - in -lieu fee. or 26 x 870 = 22,620 sf (.52 acres) x $9,922.71/acre = $5,159.81 Notes: 1) The unimproved market value is based on the total purchase price divided by the total acreage. Comprehensive Plan Compliance The subject property is located in Study Area 1 of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan, which was adopted in September of 1995. When this plan was adopted, the County was struggling with the impacts of an historic development pattern that was driven by the predominant two -acre zoning that covers much of the private land in the County. As a result, the Comprehensive Plan includes a number of policies aimed at reducing density in future developments and preserving open space and agricultural uses. This is most directly illustrated in Objective 5.2 for Recreation and Open Space, which reads: "The County will support and encourage the creation of open space through the development and implementation of zoning, subdivision and PUD regulations designed to retain and enhance existing open space uses." Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 10 This idea is also contained in the agricultural goal statement in the Plan, which states: "To ensure that existing agricultural uses are allowed to continue in operation and compatibility issues are addressed during project review." The proposed development scheme has been designed to preserve a vast majority of the irrigated meadows as well as the irrigation ditches and other agricultural improvements on the property in order to allow continued agricultural use. Over 63 percent of the properties total acreage has been preserved in common open space and will remain in agricultural operation. Another 104 acres, contained within the proposed lots, will be restricted against the development of any structures or landscaping under the covenants that will be established for the project. A conservation easement deed has been executed for the property which states, "Easement Area will remain forever predominantly in its agricultural, scenic, natural and open space condition subject to the uses of the Easement Area permitted under the ("Permitted Uses")." The "permitted uses" referred to in this clause includes the proposed development as described in this application (subject to approval and conditions required by Garfield County) and those other uses necessary to manage the property for agricultural purposes, including ditch maintenance, erosion control, fence repair and maintenance, relocation of the existing barn and homestead and demolition of any non -historic structures, etc. The property has also been carefully planned to minimize visibility of the proposed residential development. Lots have been carefully sited to prevent structures from breaking a ridgeline as viewed form Cattle Creek Road. Many of the residential units will not be visible from the County roads in the area. The intent is to preserve the open space character of the subject property and surrounding area to the greatest extent possible. The Proposed Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property as appropriate for "low density residential" use. The recommended density is one unit per 10 acres or less. The gross density of the project is approximately one unit per 18 acres, which is just over half that recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. We believe the project clearly conforms to the policies and recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Compatibility of the proposed subdivision with existing land uses in the surrounding area The subject property is ideally suited for low-density residential development both from the standpoint of the views and privacy created for the proposed residential lots and the ability to develop the property with minimal impact to the surrounding area. There are several reasons for this, including the fact that the property is bordered on the west and south by BLM land. The property also contains rolling terrain that provides screening for many of the proposed lots. Portions of the property are also higher in elevation than much of the surrounding area, which allows development to be screened by locating building envelopes back from the edge of ridges. Further, most of the adjacent privately owned lands remain undeveloped. There are other developments in the surrounding area but these are relatively distant from the subject property. Similarly, traffic from the project will have minimal impact on the surrounding area. The project will Ranch at Coulter Creek 11 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application generate roughly 247 new trips on local roads. Most of these trips will proceed east on County Road 115 to the intersection with County Road 113 and from there, south towards Carbondale and Highway 82, utilizing County Road 100 or west towards Glenwood Springs on Cattle Creek Road (CR 113). According to the County's Road and Bridge Department, counts have not been done on these roads in some time. The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan shows counts on segments of County Roads 115, 113 and 100. While these counts are old (1993) they are provided for historic reference. The counts are ✓KP -0 AGI as follows: CR 115 (west of the property): CR 113 (west of intersection w/CR100): CR 113 (west of CR 112): CR 100 (south of CR 103): Off-street parking 25 ADT 75 ADT 700 ADT 300 ADT The Zoning Code requires that each lot incorporate one off-street parking space for each 600 square feet of building floor area. While this standard is best considered during the building permit review stage when the size of a particular dwelling unit is known, we offer the following information for discussion purposes at this stage in the review process. Though the County does not limit the size of residential structures, the Applicant is willing to limit house size on the property to 8,000 square feet on lots 3 through 26 and 12,000 square feet on Lots 1 and 2. Given the parking standard identified above, an 8,000 square -foot structure would be required to provide 13 off-street parking spaces. While there is ample room on the proposed lots to accommodate this many spaces, this standard seems excessive. We would ask the County to consider allowing a reduced standard if, at building permit application, an owner can provide an acceptable rationale for a reduction in the number of off-street parking spaces. Conservation, Wildlife Habitat Enhancement and Architectural Guidelines The Colorado Division of Wildlife has identified the subject property as "winter range" for both Elk and Mule Deer and "severe winter range" for Elk (see Figures 5 and 6). The proposed project has been designed to retain corridors in several locations throughout the property for animal movement. In addition, the bulk of the property has been preserved as common open space to retain the property's wildlife habitat value. In addition, the landowner intends to establish a set of conservation guidelines, which will be communicated to all property owners within the development and will be administered by the homeowner's association. An outline of these guidelines has been prepared and is included as Attachment 11 of this application. The guidelines will address dog control; landscape plantings, wildlife habitat enhancement, fencing and site design as well as other issues associated with the development, use and long-term maintenance needs of the property. Historically, elk and mule deer have utilized the property for grazing and have moved through the property from the BLM lands to the south and west to the adjacent ranchlands to the north of the subject property. To allow animal movement through the property several movement corridors have been established as part of the site design. One of these is located between the building envelopes on Lots 7 and 8 along the west side of the property, where the subject property abuts the adjacent BLM land (Fisher Creek Special Management Area). A second corridor is located between the building envelopes on Lots 17 and 18. A third corridor is located to the south of Lots 23 through 26. This last corridor allows animals to move to and from Coulter Creek, which is located to the east of the subject property. Other smaller corridors such as the area between the building Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 12 envelopes on Lots 10 and 11 have also been retained. These corridors, together with the large common open space area and planned wildlife enhancements, will help preserve the property's high quality wildlife habitat. Architectural guidelines are also being developed to address the appearance and function of structures on the property. The guidelines will also include recommendations for sustainable "green" architecture. A draft outline of these guidelines is included as Attachment 12. There are no plans to install street lighting of any kind on the ranch. Landscape lighting for individual residences will be addressed in the architectural guidelines and in the covenants. Noxious Weed Control The Laurence ranch has not been worked for the past several years and, as a result, there are areas on the property with significant infestation of common thistle and other noxious weeds. This condition predates the current owner's purchase of the property. Measures have already been taken to improve the condition of the property including making arrangements with a local rancher to put the property back into agricultural operation. This will help prevent further spread of noxious weeds on the ranch. A weed control expert has also been contracted to begin the process of treating the existing noxious weeds. Attachment 13 is a letter from Matt Johnson, owner of Roaring Fork Vegetation Management Company, who has been retained to implement a noxious weed control program. Funds for the long-range control of noxious weeds will be provided through the homeowners association. b 1 Wildfire Most of the proposed lots are located in open areas where native grasses are the predominant form of vegetation. Lots 18 and 19 are the only sites located in an area where there is significant overstory vegetation and slopes. The proposed building envelope on Lot 19 is located in a stand of mature scrub oaks and pinion juniper. There is also significant vegetation down slope of this site. However, the trees in this area are relatively widely dispersed. As a result, thinning to accommodate wildfire mitigation could be accomplished without losing too many trees. We would note that there is no building site on Lot 16 that is significantly better in terms of its exposure to wildfire. There are small areas within this lot that have fewer trees but the slope and soil in these areas are not conducive to development (steep slopes, rocky soils). The applicant is committed to complying with the necessary mitigation measures to protect the proposed building sites from wildfire hazard. However, we would like to accomplish this with the minimum loss of vegetation. We would suggest that a strategy that includes structural measures as well as minimum thinning be considered. We would like to work with the Colorado State Forest Service to resolve this issue prior to Preliminary Plat review. Summary We believe we have demonstrated compliance with all applicable standards and criteria required for approval of Subdivision Sketch Plan pursuant to Section 3.00 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. We, therefore, request Sketch Plan approval so that a Preliminary Plat application can be prepared to address this project in greater detail. Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 13 FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map _e Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 White River National Forest_ Subject Property/ BL M South Parcel1.1 BLM r I Cattily Ces.kd. tlt:l I , 2 --- t \ LI- 1 ill:4 e- \ xI i k 1 1 s 1 / i r` .., - ! Y j L. i 3�_ � j.r.1 I / ��•' � Carbondale,Sale: 1 "=1_�Miie �- u- Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application VicinityM a p Figure 1 Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application FIGURE 2 Site Survey/Existing Conditions M a p September 2002 BLM BLM A PARC TOWNSHII & SECTION 1, TC COUN 11104 CTY. RD. NO ADDRESS APPARENT FOUND #5 REBAR NO CAP UPGRADE P.LS. 31944 FOUND #5 REBAR NO CAP UPGRADE P.L.S. 31944 STEEP SLOPED AREA NOM& - MUM DELATED TROY TANTE A OP ALTA Ri UZ1N .'TD rale CLIO? 1. KA)s(3) 9.&17. - ADDITIONAL I3 ORMur1RUN PEON ELDORADO EN OIC & MRIs COMET 1NCJNNERS SUAVE= - 8!R►ET ORIERTATMN 11 TIM SI & e!►/M OP SIC 1 AS SHIN: - EASINIIM'S EIA ARE PROM LAND Ma CpARARrss DO. EOM ETENr ONMER NO. IMESTOata - MIS DOM NOT REPRESENT I TITLE SW= N7 TMS T= OR SURVEYOR - ND PLOOD ZONE 1WIE NAr10N 111701MATION 11 AVAILABLE ON TNS ~MKT T - ALL MIN=OR TM= Ayr STIOM • - ZN JCATZE IW MDINIMeN7 PEE IONS MILSId OrPalslls Norco A - =CAM CUM= PONT O - INDICATES SIT =BAR & PLASTIC CAP SSC P.LR 81111 - 1N'DICATID CLDM11 OP TRW O - RYDeCATR4 mos OR RAMOS OP TIME =KM —t- - 1MIlCATIS UNDERIM ND PROM LINZ Cao—oh- - 1MUCAros OTWTT POLE WRIT OVERHEAD MIS - INTIMATES Tsar LINE PRICK •�• - JAAICATEI cPo O - INDICATES PERS. INDICATES TELL - INDICATES MIND STANDARD ILA CAP UNLESS Om w wE NOTED BLM STEEF SLOPE AREA N NOTICE: ACCORDING 10 COLORADO LAW YOU DUST COM IENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT N THUS SURVEY WITHIN TREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVERED 51)01 DEFECT N NO EMIT. NAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT N THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE DM TEN HEARS FROM 1IE DATE OF VIE CERIFICA1ION SHOWN IMDIEa . A.L. T.A./A.C.S. M. LAND TITLE SURVEY A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 6 & 7 WNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. N 1, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO. PARENT S89' CENTERUNE COUNTY BAR LAZY Y, LTD. CENTERUNE COUNTY ROAD ROAD 115 1363.84' BLM pod . w N 0 11 MILE POST 0 0 N 0 N cn P1 • 0 0 J 0 0 115 FOUND REBAR & CAP IW. BENT UPGRADE P.L.S. 31944 FL DITCH 0 0 N j Il'�1 ir n, ►� �ti! ` 50.04. FOUND t ts c g REBAR & CAP FOUND P.LS. 19598 NAILS O. m 7090 N O C 0 0 0 N • WINSTON J. WIWAMS 89' 9'27'W 1333.97' VAN* COULTER VALLEY R, CL 60' ACCESS ESM T. N0413'42"E 189.8' TIE S1822'13"E 1351.75 BK502PG213 N00'52'56'M 4$ 9h4' POND U x 887•28111T FOUND 581.47' REBAR & CAP CL 60' P.LS. 19598 UTIL R.O.W. N1817'40"E 200' 11E S19'01' 48"E 1304.35' BK874PG784 FOUND STONE 5 FOUND REBAR & CAP s E S. 15710 STEEP SLOPED AREA N8 C1r COMIDICE ME SW SUCH DEFECT.DEFECT IN THE SEXTON SURVEY COMPANY 128 WEST 8RD STREET RIPL; COLORADO 81850 970-826-8711 OR 945-4700 BLM 1 47.6 CATTLE CREEK, LTD. FOUND REBAR & CAP P.L.S. 12870 z r R)• CA) • W • A$ SK 7020 • "36'CL 4C 7040 ACCES FOUND REBAR & CAP P.L.S. 15710 8 FOUND 8 STONE LAURENCEA. L. T. A. A. C. S. M. LAND TITLE SURVEY (LOWER RANCH) A PARCEL T.7: DEMON courrr c r 'CTION 6 & 7 IF THE 6TH P.M WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. 'OLORADO. BAR LAZY Y, LTD. CENTERLINE COUNTY ROAD 1MILE POST J -4 J 0 0 115 FOUND REBAR & CAP IW. BENT UPGRADE P.L.S. 31944 FL DITCH N 0 co COULTER CREEK VALLEY RANCH, LTD. CL 60' ACCESS ESM T. N04'33'42"E 189.8' TIE S18'22'13"E 1351.798' BK502PG213 89.45'48' rt 416.15' riFi.....(.tl(tl((11111 <) tl`:'C{:,al,rlimpq'Iem• w'P, J J J J FOUND REBAR & CAP FOUND P.LS. 19598 NAILS 0 0 0 fU • WINSTON J. WIWAMS N00'52'56'W 148.02' N44'24'33'V 60.73' N87927'33'11 52.00' FOUND REBAR & CAP'S P.LS. 15710 1489''445'448'E° 4POPO xS87.28'li'E FOUND 581.47' REBAR & CAP P.LS. 19598 CL 60' UTIL R.O.W. N18'37'40"E 200' 11E S19'01'48"E 1304.35' BK874PG784 FOUND STONE 5 8 clUktil: z 0 —0 N • W FOUND REBAR & CAP aei*S. 15710 BLM 1 4 .67' CATTLE CREEK, LTD. FOUND REBAR & CAP P.LS. 12870 7020 N00'02'331E 180A0' RIGHT OF WAY BK. 61 PG. 553 APPROX. CL CREEK ASPEN BLUE SKY HOLDINGS, LLC. 3 6' CL 40' WIDE 7040 ACCESS EASEMENT FOUND REBAR & CAP P.L.S. 15710 7 8 FOUND 7'8 STONE LAURENCEA. L. T. A. A. C. S. M. LAND TITLE SURVEY (LOWER RANCH) JO. NO.: 99134T02 DATA 12/17/ )1 DWG. BY: BAS REV: REV: L PARCEL OP LAND SJTDITID IX SECTION B ! 7, 2 T. 7 S.. R 87 I OP THE 6TH P.M D SECTION 1, T. 7 S.. R. 88 I OF Tor era P.Y Q COUM7' OP GARFIEL.D, STATE OF COLORADO 2 FIGURE 3 Sketch Plan (11" by 17") Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 um me on di ma me on 'NI on me gm me me um on um on me am rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-rrrrrr-rrr- 0000000000000000000000000 -I-I-I-1-1-I-I-I-I-I-4-I-1-I-1-I-I-i-.I-1-1-1-I-I-1 UNi.p. 60OD�10f014.CA -•OtDODVO�UIWN� °nig 2ONODt i PO� 1►QDNWt,�t► F►'`8ZA" ++ Nal-'(Ji00 OVVWOOO�POVNWVOVOV�� >>>>>>>»>>»>>>>>>>>>>>> ,OI'OSEI VzgLAT III an um on um No s on me me on In am as on me as um am mu ,911261 ,2L'22BT 3,ST,6C.TOS .�LJ,��►�/-�II►,1 jr,)I l • ., `// 1. /fti4/ / 1•�n\\\fir / vi �/ J r DH VA / / t/ J / //' /// .�— ce^ 1111\� �� 111/7 \��=----t ___-- ---------:=___ //%7_'2k›---,---_,/ I -N\ .,- '-',, J. _ ir( , / _2___ _____._-:::' ------"---/-%„-------------17///,--,\ _->..____, "----__. 2 -z ---,-r___‘, //././-• --y.-- \\:_-_-_-----,,,_:--1,) \ /1 fi % _ % / /// // J/// I,/ // j'�////i-/ 11/�//� /// /,1I/ , IIIII '/ / ,_.III(I 1)3 5 / ,``.-1 =/�\�_,, ,Jill, //)// A ---. ., /-; _ -2-:_, \ \ \, ,\_--->h Itilj-=-\\\ -// -\ \\/ -lllljJ/1r it- //// I IfI II j \\7- - /7 : \\\\\ ' 7,4, Till .11 II '1 ''' ,// \\\\✓/ x�\\\\Yj // M.2O,tbbo0 WINSTON J. WILLIAMS 0 0 • i \\\ • • ,9V8021 3,92,617e00S 0 Z DM �r- cn Z m O c z -1 Ql1 Om oZ Dz — - r ulZ m n 0 z FIGURE 4 Land Use Map Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 Prepared By: TG Malloy Consulting, LLC FN.+. rD n ro ro z 0 x En NM EN N N N M r In ,OT'b2£T 0 3.Q2,OZ.00S ZcoOD b a • O�!.'... 0 1i4,24.00S s,fghtaniaa pug spuog sadoianua uipiing ,9T'LZET '— r (adoianua ammo) eaay 3oq aauds uadp uowwo3 r MN E M i11111 ro rD lad 70 b 0.4 ,ZL'ZZ£T 3.S1,6£.1OS At1 o fi IP" 3,2C,SO.TOS 3.vO,LC.68S cn 0 N ceras cnvac 3.L6,4S.68N w Ln 56.5 • • rD ,L8'E621 M,T£,6£.00N 00 U ,28'ST£t M,20,44.00N . z 0 0 0. I z 0o 0. cip .00'081 3.EE.20.00N ,94'8 02I ,94'8601 3,92,64.00S FIGURE 5 Mule Deer Habitat (WR1S Map) Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 1 1 111 • ja ,r)r � ij !1?�i ra • - k.• yii ryfrr �4 !__ t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Transportation BLM •CNT / FOR A/ INT A/ OTH Ai STA A/ UNK Ai USA Gsforby �i Deer Winter Range A Deer Winter Conc Area TT-_ Deer Severe Winter Range Surface BLM BOR DOE 1 FOR 1 PRI 11 STA Prepared by Dawn Keating, March 2002 Wildlife Consultant Based on CDOW WRIS data Lower Laurence Ranch Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application Mule Deer Habitat Map Figure 5 FIGURE 6 Elk Habitat (WR1S Map) Ranch at Coulter Creek September 2002 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A-V•L•T� 4 0 4 Prepared by Dawn Keating, March 2002 'F"lrilife Consultant Based on CDOW WRIS data Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application Transportation / BLM FOR "/ INT OTH N STA UNK USA Gsforby r.1.-7,1 EIk Winter Range I1TI 1111 EIk Severe Winter Ran Surface �BLM L___ BOR DOE IFOR PRI ^1 STA 8 Miles ElkHabitat Map Figure 6 Attachment 1 Proof of Ownership Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JUN- 6-02 THU 10:38 P.M AVLT FAX NO. 9709638441 9 P. 1 Land Title Guarantee Company Date: June 04, 2002 Verizunl'IC LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 9i. GARFIELD & HECT, P.C, 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Enclosed please fico] the title insurance policy for your property lucxLed at The following endorsements are included in this policy: Endorsement 100.32 Elidorsetnettt 103.1 Deletion of Standard Exception() Endo tgenie ctt 116.1 Please review this policy in its entirety. In the event that you find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions regutding your final title policy, you truly contact Title De'artment Phone: 970.945-2610 Fax: 970945-4784 Please refer to our Order No. GW237632 Should you decide to sell die property described in this policy, or if you are required to purchase a new title conunitmeut for mortgage purposes. you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance premiums. Laird Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of this policy so we will be able to provide future products and services to you quickly and efficiently., Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you, Sincerely, Land Tithe Guarantee Company 5-02 THU 10:38 AM AVLT FAX ND. 9709838441 9 P. 2 LTG Policy No. LTHi1237632 Form AO/ORT Our Order No. (W237632 Property Address: poMi Schedule A A:Itount $4,000,000.00 I. Policy Date: January 17, 2002 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: verizon?IC LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A Fre Siruplu 4 Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: VerizoiPlC LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows! LOT 5 OF SECTION 1, IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANCOE 88 W OF THE GTH P.M., W1/2SE1/4, E1/2SW1/4 AND LOTS 6, 7 AND 8 OF SECTION 6; NII2NEI/4, SW1/4NE1t4 AND NE1/4NW 1/4, ALL iN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 W OF THE 6TH P. M. COUNTY OF G.AP.EIELD STATE OF COLORADO This Policy valid only if Schedule 13 is attached. Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company JUN- 6-02 THU 10:39 AM AVLT FAX Na 9709338441 P. 3 LTG Policy No. LTHH237632 Form AO/ORT Our Order No. 0W237632 • Schedule B This policy dues ilot insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: I . Rights or claims of parties to possession not Shown by the public records. 2. Easel/wilts, or claims oreasetnents, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortayic in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which arc not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5, GENERAL OR SPECIAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS RF-QUIRFD TO BE PAID IN THE YEAR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 15, 2002, FROM VERIZONPIC LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2,150,000.00 RECORDED JANUARY 17, 2002. IN BOOK 1321 AT PAGE 707 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 595827. 7. WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. 8, RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JANUARY 18, 1919. IN BOOK 112 AT PAGE 501; NOVEMBER 18, 1919 IN 1300K 112 AT PAGE 518: MARCH 25, 1915 IN BOOK 92 AT PAGE 342; FEBRUARY 21, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 377. 9. RIGH'i OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM. SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 377 AS RECEPTION NO. 18580. 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PpGB PROVISIONS 3 AND RECORDED DIr WATERING CEMBER�s 1962 NN BOOK RECORDEDT 6 JULY 16, 1904 IN 61 AT PAGE 42. S OwN ON SURVEY i l . EASEMENTS SEXTON SURVEY COMPANY DATED DECEMBER 17,2001 ASJOB NO.O9913 T01tEPARED BYTEE 1 JUN- b -U-! Ttili l U by AM AVLT Ir Form AO/OR1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Our Order No. GW237632 ?AX 7Ub.a441 y Y. 4 LTG Policy No. LTKf1237632 Schedule 0 12. TERMS, AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF GRANT OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR UTILITIES RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 IN BOOK 874 AT PAGE 784 AS RECEPTION NO. 452173. 13. AE�EAGREEMENTS, CED DECEMBER C10, 1999IONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF IN BOOK 1164 AT PAGE 38S EASEMENT TION AGREE NO. 556556. 14. 'PERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF STOCK WATERING EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1977 IN BOOK 502 AT PAGE 211. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GRANT OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROADWAY RECORDED OCTOBER 2S, 1977 IN BOOK 502 AT PAGE 213. 16. EASEMENTS NURVLY CIUMPANY DATED DECEMBER 17, 2001 AS ONGHTS OF WAY FOR DITCHES AS SHOWN PREPARED BY THE SEX'IIO SJOB NO 99134 pP TILI t?. PREAND EISEXTONF SURVEY COMPANY DATED DE SHWAY FOR OVEEADOWN PREPARED ON SURVEY 2001 AS 011 NO. 99134T02. 18 POSSESSORY RIGHTS OUTSIDE OP FENCELINE AND ENCROACHMENT OF FENCE ONTO ADJOINING PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY PREPARED BY THE SEXTION SURVEY COMPANY DATED DECEMBER 17, 2001 AS JOB NO. 99134T02. JUN- 6-02 THU 10 40 AM AVLT Case GW237632 Policy LT1 8237632 Loan # FAX NO. 9709638441 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY 9 P. 5 ENDORSEzc NT 100.32 Property Address Owner V9riaonPIC LLC, A ARLAWARE LXMITED LIABILIDY COMPANY They Company .insures the insured against loss which the insured shall sustain by reason of damage to existing and future improvements, including lauds, shrubbery or trees resulting from the exercise of any right to use the surface of the lend for the extraction or development of the m.ineralra excepted from the descrspticn of the land or shown as a reservation in Schedule B. rhi..a endorsement i5 made a part of the policy And is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto.. Except to the extent expressly stared, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof - Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company JUN- b-UZ TiIU 1U:41 AM AVL'l' Cage GW237632 Policy LT5N237632 Loan y'(U`'b 4441 y ?. b LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY ENDORSEMENT 103.1 Property Address Owner VexizonplC LAC, A DELAWARE LI1tZTED Z,SABILTTY COMPANY Y'he r° Pany hereby insures against loss or damage which the Insured shall ,sustain as a result of any exercise of the right of use or maintenance of the easement referred to in paragraph(s) SEVEN of Schedule B or through said land. The total liability of the Company under said policy and any endorsements therein shall not exceed, in the aggregate, the face amount of said policy and :oats which the Company is obligated under the Conditions and Stipulations thereof to pay. This endorsement is made a parc of said policy and it subject to the Schedules, conditions and Stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company JUN- 6-02 THU 10:41 AM AVLT Case OW237632 Policy LTEH237632 Loan 0 Property Address Owner FAX N0. 9709638441 9 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY gNDORSEMENr 116.1 verizonPlC LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LXMILITr COMPANY Tne Company hereby insures that said land is the same as that delineated on the pls of a survey made by SEXTION SURVEY COMPANY on DEceMBER 17, 2001 designated Job No. 99134T02 Tho Ccm pany hereby insures against loss or damage which said Assured shall suotain in e2:c event that the assurance herein shall prove to be incorrect. The total liabil.tty of the Company under said policy and any endorsements thexe.en rha27 not oxr_eed, in the aggregate, the face amount of said policy and costs which rhe Company is obligated under the conditions and stipulations rhereof to pay. This endorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions, and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company JUI' D -UL In 1U 4L t1D1 AYLI Case GW237632 Polioy LTNU276i2 Loan # Property Address Owner CM 11U. O f UnJO'Y±1 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY ENDORSEMENT 110.3 VerizonPTC LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY THE NAME OF THE INSURED IS HEREIN CHANGED TO SLC-LAURENCE, LLC. r. c This endorsement is made a part of the policy or commitment and is subject to all the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto. Except co the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy or commitment and prior endorsemenCe,if any, por rts or ies t exteedttee effective date of the policy or commitment and prior face amount thereof. Countersigned= Authorised Officer or Agent Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Attachment 2 Authorization Letter Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September2002 SLC Snowmass Land Company March 11, 2002 Garfield County Planning Department 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Authorization to Represent To Whom It May Concern: By this letter, Snowmass Land Company hereby authorizes TG Malloy Consulting, LLC to represent us in matters related to the land use application for the Laurence Ranch property located in Garfield County. This includes the preparation and submission of documents associated with the land use application and representation of this application before the applicable appointed and elected boards. We are seeking Subdivision Exemption and Rural Land Development Exemption Option approval from Garfield County for this property. Sincerely, SLC -Laurence, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Sno ass Land Company, a Delaware limited liability company, its Manager By: Jo G. Sarpa, Director of Development cc: Tim Malloy Reid Haughey, AVLT Post Office Box 6119 % Snowmass Village, Colorado 81615 % Telephone: 970-923-2880 % FAX 970-923-4305 Attachment 3 List of Adjacent Property Owners Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September2002 Ranch at Coulter Creek Adjacent Property Owner List Aspen Blue Sky Holdings, LLC P.O. Box 8238 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Bar Lazy Y, Ltd. P.O. Box 20052 Oakland, California 94620-0052 United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Glenwood Springs Resource Area P.O. Box 1009 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602-1009 Harriet McNight Crosby Trustee of the Harriet McNight Crosby Revocable Trust 6515 79th Place Cabin John, Maryland 20818-1223 Coulter Creek Valley Ranch, Ltd. P.O. Box 1714 Aspen, Colorado 81612-1714 Winston J. Williams 1208 Waterstone Boulevard Franklin, Tennessee 37069 Attachment 4 Deed of Conservation Easement Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September2002 MAR -14-02 THU 11:03 AM AVLT FAX 1(4. 9709638441 9 P. 2 DEED OF CONSERVATION EASiT'.MENT TIIIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Epernent") is granted this _ day of 200_, by VER1ZONPIC, l.I.C, a Delaware limited liability company ("Grantor"), whose address is to and for the benefit of ASPEN VALLEY LAND) 'TRUST, a Colorado not-for-profit corporation (the Trust"), whose address is P.O. Box 940, Aspen, Colorado 8612, for the purpose of preserving certain agricultural, open space and wildlife values of certain real property in Garfield County, Colorado in acconlance with this Easement. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Grantor is the sole owner in fee simple of certain real property in Garfield County, Colorado known as the Lower Parcel of the Laurence Ranch, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property possesses agricultural, open space historic and wildlife values (coliectively, "Conservation Values") of importance to the Trust, the people of Garfield County, and the people of the State of Colorado, which are worthy of preservation; and WHEREAS, in particular, the Properly includes irrigated pastures, a hast and nineteenth century Homestead residence of historic value, and is completely encompassed by the Wildlife Resource inventory Maps of the Colorado Division of Wildlife as Critical Elk Winter Range; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Garfield County Resolution Grantor has obtained approvals from Garfield County, Colorado (the "Development Approvals") to develop the Property into __ single family lots in accordance with the site [flan attached hereto as Exhibit "Tr, anti WIII:RI:AS, Grantor acknowledges that this Easement is intended to satisfy in part the requirements of that certain Contract to Buy and Sell (teal Estate between Aspen Valley i.and Trust, as Seller and the Snowmass Land Company, as Buyer dated December 20, 2001, which contract was assigned by Snowmass Land Company to Grantor; and WHEREAS, Grantor intends that the development of the Property occur in a manner intended to reasonably preserve and maintain the Conservation Values of the Property by the continuation of certain land use patterns, including, without limitation, those relating to continued irrigation of the historically irrigated meadows, the preservation of the exteriors of the two historic structures (the barn and the homestead) existing as of the date hereof, which the 'frust acknowledges and agrees do not significantly impair or interfere with those values; and WI i E It EAS, Grantor further intends, as owner of the Property, to convey to the Trust the right to preserve and protect the Conservation Values of the Property in perpetuity; and WHEREAS, the Trust agrees by accepting this Easement to honor the intentions of Grantor stated herein and to preserve and protect m perpetuity the Conservation Values of the Property for the benefit of this generation and the generations to come. MAR-14-UZ THU 11:U4 AM AVL'!' rAK IiU. TtUHbHd441 y r• 3 W1 t EREAS, the Trust is a charitable organization as described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and is a publicly supported organization as described in Section 170(b)(1)(A) of the Code whose primary purpose is to preserve and protect the natural, scenic, agricultural, historical, and open space resources of the Roaring Fork Valley area, including the area in which the Property is located, by assisting landowners who wish to protect their land in perpetuity, and is a "qualified organization" to do so within the meaning of Section 170(h)(3) of the Code. WHEREAS, the State of Colorado has recognized the importance of private efforts toward the preservation of natural systems in the State by the enactment of C.R.S. 38-30.5-101 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Trust has duly adopted a resolution approving the Trust's execution and acceptance of Grantor's gift of this Easement. NOW, TFI13Rr FORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions contained herein, and pursuant to the lawa of the State of Colorado, and in particular C.R.S. 38-30.5-101 eCt.seei., Grantor hereby voluntarily grants and conveys to the Trust, its successors and assigns, a Conservation Easement in perpetuity, consisting of the rights and restrictions enumerated herein, over and across the portion of the Property identified on Exhibit "C" attached hereto (the "Easement Area"). It is expressly understood and agreed that the portion of the Property not included within the Easement Area is not subject to or encumbered by the terms of this Easement. 1. Purpose. it is the purpose of this Easement to assure that the Easement Area will remain forever predominantly in its agrieultural, scenic, natural and open space condition, subject to the users of the Easement Area permitted hereunder ("Permitted Uses"), and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with the Conservation Values of the Casement Area and, in the event of their degradation or destruction, to restore such Conservation Values of the Easement Area. Grantor intends that this Easement will confine the use of the Easement Area to such activities, including, without limitation, those involving ranching, farming, recreation, conservation, and general conservation purposes, as are consistent with the purpose of this Easement. Pursuant to the terms of C.R.S. 3B-30.5-101 et seq., the Basement Arca preserved hereby may not be converted or directed to any ether uses other than those provided herein. 2. (tights of Trust. To accomplish the purpose of this Easement, but subject at all times to all Permitted Uses, Grantor conveys the following rights to the Trust by this Easement: 2.1 The right to preserve and protect the Conservation Values of the Easement Area; and 2.2 The right to enter upon the Easement Area at reasonable times, to inspect the Easement Area thoroughly, to inonitor Grantor's compliance with and otherwise enforce the terms of this Easement; provided that such entry shall be upon 4 least twenty-four hours' prior written notice to Grantor. The Trust shall not interfere with Grantor's use and quiet enjoyment 2 MAR -14-02 THU 11 05 AM AVLT FAX NO. 9709538441 9 P. 4 of the Eeserent Area; and 2.3 The right to seek appropriate remedies to prevent any activity on or use of the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement, and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Area that are materially damaged by any inconsistent activity or use; and 2.4 Any other rights which the parties may negotiate consistent with the purpose of this Easement. 3. Permitted Uses. The following uses, though not an exhaustive recital, are consistent with this Easement and may he conducted within the Easement Area! (A) Installation, repair and maintenance of water wells, underground water lines, water storage tanks, irrigation systems, ponds, streams and irrigation ditches. 03) Taking of such reasonable steps as Grantor deems necessary to control erosion and to prevent sedimentation of streams or ponds. (C) Installation, repair and maintenance of fencing consistent in height and type of construction with Colorado Division of Wildlife standards designed to prevent interference with wildlife. (D) Such cutting and removal of dead, dying or diseased timber or brush as may be reasonably necessary lbr lire protection or disease prevention purposes, however, Grantor is encouraged to leave standing dead timber for habitat purposes to the extent such dead timber does not pose a danger. (E) Pasturing, grazing, feeling and care of domestic animals that do not comprise a coanntercial feedlot. (F) Passive, non -motorized, non-commercial uses, including but not limited to hiking, horseback riding, hunting, shooting and archery, fishing and cross-country skiing, all in accordance with standards intended to assure non-intorterence with the critical wildlife; and including development ofnew trails. (G) Continuation of historic fanning and ranching (including the cultivation of alfullh rind other grasses customarily planted in the area); including: the use of pesticides so long as used in accordance with Colorado State University's Dost Management Practices and in accordance with labels; plowing and reseeding in accordance. with good farming practices and the use of agricultural, motorized vehicles. (H) Pertbrmance of' any restoration or improvement measures for the habitat or natural features of the Conservation Arca as recommended and/or approved by the Trust. (l) Construction, maintenance, repair and development of amenities, roads, utilities 3 MAK -14 -UL ftU 11:UU AM AVLT PAI NU, y.1UbJti441 and infrastructure (including customary signage), but only to the extent permitted by and consistent with the Development Approvals. (J) Relocation of the existing historic barn and homestead. (K) Demolition of the non -historic residence and any structures other than the historic ham and homestead. 4. Prohibited Uses. Any activity on or use of the Easement Area inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement is prohibited. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly prohibited: mining; billboards; trash storage; storage of hazardous materials; retail, commercial or industrial activity; introduction of non-native species; oft -road vehicle use; and exterior lighting. 5. Reserved Rights. Grantor reserves to itself and to its successors, and assigns, all rights accruing from its ownership of the Easement Area, including the right to engage in all uses of the Easement Area that are not expressly prohibited herein and are not inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement, 6. Trust's Remedies; Enforcement. 0.1 No/ice of Violation: Corrective Action. if the Trust reasonably detetnnines that a violation of the teams of this Easement has occurred or is threatened, the Trust shall give written notice to Grantor of such violation and demand corrective action sufficient to cure the violation. Where the violation involves injury to the Easement Area resulting from any use or activity inconsistent with the purpose of this Easement, the Tnist's notice shall include a demand to restore the portion of the Easement Area so injured to its prior condition in accordance with a plan reasonably approved by the Mist. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Grantor reasonably disagrees witit the 'frost's determination that a violation of the terms of this Easement has occurred or is threatened, Grantor shall notify the Trust in writing within twenty (20) days of Grantor's receipt of the Trust's written notice and the parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve the matter. l f the parties are not able to resolve the matter within thirty (30) days, the matter shall be submitted to binding arbitration in Garfield County, Colorado. Each party shall bear its own costs and expenses in connection with such arbitration. 6.2 Injunctive Relied If Grantor fails to cure a violation within sixty (60) days after receipt of notic:e thereof from the Trust or after conclusion of arbitration, as the case may bc, or under circumstances where the violation cannot reasonably he cured within a sixty (60) day period, fails to basin curing such violation within the sixty (60) (hy period, or fails to continue diligently to cure such violation until finally cured, the Trost may bring an action at law or in equity in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Easement, to enjoin the violation, ex Bane as necessary, by temporary or permanent injunction, and to require the restoration of the Easement Area to the condition that existed prior to any such injury. 6.3 DamaRes. 'flee Tnist shall be entitled to recover damages for violation of the terms of this Easement or injury to any Conservation Values protected by this Easement; provided, however, that the amount of such damages shall not exceed the cost of undertaking appropriate 4 MAR -14-02 THU 11:06 AM AVLT FAX NO, 9709638441 9 P. 6 corrective ,action on the Easement Area and any and all damages recovered shall he applied by the trust to undertake appropriate corrective action on the Easement Area. 6.4 Scope of Relief. Grantor agrees that the Trust's remedies at law for any violation of the terns of this Easement are inadequate and that the Trust shall be entitled to the injunctive relief described in Section 6.2, both prohibitive and mandatory, in addition to such other relief to which the Trust may be entitled, including specific performance of the terms of this Easement, without the necessity of proving either actual damages or the inadequacy of otherwise available legal remedies. The Trust's remedies described in this section 6 shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to all remedies now or hereafter existing at law or m equity. 6.5 Costs of Enforcement. All reasonable costs incurred by the Trust in enforcing the teens of this Easement against Grantor, including, without limitation, costs and expenses of suit anti reasonable attorney's fees, and any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's violation of the terms of this Easement shall be borne by Grantor; provided, however, that if Grantor ultimately prevails in a judicial enforcement action, the Trust shall pay for all of Grantor's costs. 6.6 The Tru t'S ,Q,iscd-el,;otf. Enforcement of the tens of this Easement shall be al the sole discretion of the Trust, and any forbearance by the Trust to exercise its rights under this Easement in the event of any breach of any term of this Easement by Grantor shall not be deemed or consented to be a waiver by the Trust of such terra or any subsequent breach of the sarrle or any other term o1' this Easement or of'any or the Trust's rights under this Easement. No delay or omission by the Trust in the exercise of any right or remedy upon any breach by Grantor shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. 6.7 Waiver of Certain Defenses. No action shall be commenced or maintained to enforce the terms of any building restriction described in this Easement, or to compel the removal of any building or improvement, unless said action is commenced within the period describer) in CR.S. Section 3841-119. (a .8 Ae eyond Grantor's Control, Nothing contained in this Easement shall be construed to entitle the 'frust to bring any action against Grantor for any injury to or change in the Easement Area resulting from causes beyond Grantor's control, including, without limitation, lire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken by Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to the Easement Arca resulting from such causes. 7, Access; Use. Nothing contained herein shall be consulted as affording the public access to any portion of the Property (including the Easement Area). Grantor has the right to determine who may have access to the Property on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, in its sole and absolute discretion, provided that such access is consistent with the terms of this Easement. 8. Costs, Liabilities, Taxes and Environmental Compliance. 8.1 Costs, Legal Req g;e,lits.and Liabilities. Grantor retains all responsibilities and 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MAX -14-1_1Z THU 11:U7 AM AVLT FAX NO. 9709639441 9 P. 7 shall hear all costs arid liabilities of any kind related to the ownership, operation, upkeep, and maintenance of the Easement Area, including the maintenance of adequate liability insurance coverage. Grantor remains solely responsible for obtaining any applicable governmental permits and approvals for any construction or other activity or use permitted by this Easement, and all such construction or other activity or use shall be undertaken in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and requirements. 8.2 Taxes. tJitless Grantor is contesting thein in good faith, Grantor shall pay before delinquency all taxes, assessments, fees, and charges of whatever description levied on or assessed against the Property by competent authority (collectively "Taxes'), including any Taxes imposed upon, or incurred as a result of, this Easement, and shall furnish the Trust with satisfactory Evidence of payment upon the Trust's written request. 8.3 Remediation, if, at any time, there occurs, or has occurred, a release in, on, or about the F.asement Area of any substance now or hereafter defined, listed, or otherwise classified pursuant to any federal, state, or local law, regulation, or requirement as hazardous, toxic, polluting, or otherwise contaminating to the air, water, or soil, or in any way hannfiil or threatening to human health or the environment, Grantor agrees to take all reasonable steps necessary to assure its containment and remediation, including any cleanup that may be required, unless the release was caused by the Trtist, in which case the Trust shall be responsible therefor. 8.4 Control. Nothing in this Grant shall be construed as giving rise, in the absence of a judicial decree, to any right or ability in the Trust to exercise physical or managerial control over the day.to-day operations of the Easement Area, or any of Grantor's activities on the Easement Area, or otherwise to become an operator with respect to the Easement Area within the meaning of The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"), and any Colorado state law counterpart. 9. Extinguishment and Condemnation. 9.1 Extinguishment. If circumstances arise in the fixture which render the purpose of this Easement impossible to accomplish, this Easement can only be terminated or extinguished, whether in whule or in part, by judicial proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction. Bach Party shall promptly notify the other when it first learns of such circumstances. The amount of the proceeds to which the frust shall be entitled, after the satisfaction of prior claims, from any sale, exchange, or involuntary conversion of all or any portion of the Easement Arca subsequent to such termination or extinguishment, shall be determined, Curless otherwise provided by C.'olorado law at the time, in accordance with the Proceeds paragraph, below. T1ie Trust shall use all such proceeds in a manner consistent with the conservation purposes (Willis Easement. 9.2 Nruceedi. This Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately vested in the Trust, which the parties stipulate 10 have a fair market value determined by multiplying the fair market value of the Property unencumbered by this Easement (minus any increase in value after the date of this grant attributable solely to improvements which are allowed by this Easement) by the ratio of the value of this Easement at the time of this grant to the value of the Propeily, without deduction for tltc value of this Easement, at the time of this grant. The values at the time of this sant shall be those values used to calculate the deduction for federal income 6 MAR -14-02 THU 11:08 AM AVLT FAX NO. 9709338441 9 F 8 tax purposes allowable by reason of this grant, pursuant to Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. For the purposes of this paragraph, the ratio of the value of this 'Easement to the value of the Easement Area unencumbered by this Easement shall remain constant. 9..1 C.Qns.tamatiou. If 1111 or any part of the Easement Arca is taken by exercise of the power of eminent domain or acquired by purchase hi lieu of condemnation, whether by public, corporate, or other authority, so as to terminate this Casement, in whole or in part, Grantor and the Trust shall act jointly to recover the full value of the interests in the Easement Area subject to the taking or in lieu purchase and alt direct or incidental damages resulting therefrom. AH expenses reasonably incurred by Grantor and the Trust in connection with the laking or in lieu purchase shall be paid out of the amount recovered. The Trust's share of the balance of the amount recovered shall be determined by multiplying that balance by the ratio set forth in section 9.3. 9.4 Ap 1p icattion of Proceeds. The Trust shall use any proceeds received under tate circumstances described in this section 9 in a manner consistent with its conservation purposes, which arc exemplified by this Easement. 10. Assignment. This Casement is transferable, but the Trust may assign its rights and obligations lander this Easement only to an organization that is (a) ai qualified organization at the time of transfer under Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or any successor provision then applicable), and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder, and (b) authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under Colorado law. As a condition of such transfer, the Trust shall require the transferee to expressly agree, in writing, to carry out and uphold the conservation purposes of this Easement and otherwise assume all of the obligations and liabilities of the Trust set forth herein or created hereby. Atter such transfer, the Trusi shall have no further obligation or liability under this Easement. The Trust agrees to give written notice to Grantor of an assignment at least 60 days prior to the date of such assignment. The failure of the Trust to give such notice shall not affect the validity of such assignment nor shall it impair the validity of this Easement or limit its enforceability in any way. 11. Subsequent Transfers. Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Easement in any deed or other legal instrument by which it divests itself of any interest in the Easement Area, including, without limitation, a leasehold interest. Grantor shall give the Trust written notice in advance of any such transfer; however, the failure of (Grantor to do so shall not ctmstilutc a material breach or this Easement, impair the validity or this Easement or limit its enforccahilily. 12. Estoppel Certificates. Upon request by Grantor, the Trust shall within 30 days execute and deliver to Grantor, or to any party designated by Grantor, any document, including an estoppel certificate, which certifies, to the best of the Trust's knowledge, Grantor's compliance with any obligation of Grantor contained in this Easement or otherwise evidences the status of this Easement. in the event that weather, or other circumstances outside of the Trust's control, prevent the Trust from conducting an inspection within 30 days of receipt of Grantor's written request, the '1'nast shall conduct such inspection within a timely manner once such weather or circumstances which prevent the inspection no longer exist. 7 MAK -14 -UL T11U 1 I : Ua AM AYLT ?AX NU, y'IUybJc441 13. Notices. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by first class mail or overnight courier, postage prepaid, addressed as follows or to such other address as either party front tirne to time shall designate by written notice to the other: To Grantor: With a copy to: VERIZONPIC, LLC c/o Snowmass Land Company P.O. Box 6119 0021 Burnt Mountain Circle Snowiness Village, Colorado 81615 Attn: John Sarpa Chris LaCroix, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 With another copy to; Stephen Perlmutter 1849 Green Bay Road Fourth Floor Highland Park, Illinois 60035 To the Trust: Aspen Valley Land Trust 320 Main Street, Suite 204 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Attn: Director 14. Recordation. The Trust shall record this instrument in timely fashion in the official records of Garfield County, Colorado, and may re-record it at any time as may be required to preserve its rights in this Easement. 15. Amendment. If the circumstances arise under which an amendment to or modification of this instrument would be appropriate to promote the purpose of this Easement and the protection of the Conservation Values of the Casement Area, Grantor and the Trust are free to jointly amend this instrument. However, neither party is under any obligation to amend this instrument, and either party may decline to amend this instrument in its sole and exclusive judgment.. Any amendment must he in writing, and signed by both parties, and recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. 8 MAt{-14-UZ THU 11:Uy AM AVLT laAX 1tW. y (Uyb 4441 y Y. 1U 16. Subordination. At the time of conveyance of this Easement, the Easement Area is subject to a deed of trust, the holder of which has agreed by separate instrument, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D", to subordinate its rights in the Easement Area to the extent necessary to permit the Trust to enforce the purpose of this Easement in perpetuity and to prevent any modification or extinguislunent of this Easement by the exercise of any rights of the deed of trust holder. 17. General Provisions. 17.1 Controlling Law. The interpretation and performance of this Easement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. 17.2 Liberal Construction. Any general rule of construction to the contrary notwithstanding, this Easement shall be liberally construed in favor of the grant to effect the purpose of (his Easement and the policy and purpose of C.R.S. 38.30.5-101 et seq. If any provision in this instrument is found to be ambiguous, an interpretation consistent with the purpose of this Easement that would render the provision valid shall he favored over any interpretation that would render it invalid. 17.3 S. verability. If any provision of this Easement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Easement, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, as the case may be, shall not be affected thereby. 17.4 Entire Agreement. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to this Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings, or agreements relating to this Easement, all of which are merged herein. 17.5 Lialnifeinn. Nothing contained herein will result in a forfeiture or reversion of Grantor's title in any respect. 17.6 S.41cceisors. The covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions of this Easement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Easement Area. 17.7 Termination of Rights and Qb1iggit t. A party's rights and obligations under this 1asement terminate upon transfer of the party's interest in this Easement or the Easement Area, except that liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to transfer shall survive transfer. 17.8 CuLtions. The captions in this instrument have hoen inserted solely for convenience of reference and are nut a part al' this instrument and shall have no effect upon construction or interpretation. 17.9 t:: ountcrpartsfFacsirnile. The parties may execute this instrument in two or more counterparts, which shall, in the aggregate, he signed by both parties; each counterpart shall be 9 liAR-14-02 THU 11:10 AM AVLT FAX K0, 9709638441 9 P.11 deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. In the event of any disparity between the counterparts produced, the recorded counterpart shall be controlling. Facsimile signatures shall be binding. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto the Trust, its successor sand assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Grantor and the Trust have executed this .Deed of Conservation Easement on this day of 200-. CiRANTOR: VRRTZONPIC .LC, a D. lawe limited liability company Print N < e i•hn !7. 'rvpct Title: AI-Vureui to .64A 500'1- PtAmm , 614 C)ct ru il+& The TRUST: ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST, a Colorado not-for-profit corporation 13y: .1� Print Name: Executive Director STATE OF I� 414 -. ) COUNTY OF 10W The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this i'511 day of 200 7,-, by "X;11, G. Sire' j A vlr+ut t. 4.1 44, as Notit + of VERIZONPIC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Grantor. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: t [SEAL] .7"( tt Not ublic [Acknowledgment of trust on Following Page] JANICE L. 1OHNbON NOTARY f7UBL.IC STATE OF l.'-aLOI000 My Con . e A(,;il�,21.1u. I0 MAK—I4—UL ThU 11:1U ALt AVL FAA SIU, ys(Uyb,jti441 y 1/.1./ EXHIBIT "A" [Attach Legal Description of Entire Property] EXHIBIT "B" [Attach Approved Site Plan] EXHIBIT "C" [Attach Legal Description of Easement Area] EX,BIT "D" (Attach Lender's Subordination} MAkt-14.'UL 111U 11 11 AM AVL1 46 STATE OF (..L iev pit' COUNTY OF ' r The foregoing instrument w ,200,by Director of ASPEN VALLEY LAND T'1tUS. PAX r. 1.i a knowledgeyl d d 1', a Co1fad� WITNESS my hand and offici I? �1. My commission expires: ' [SEAL] hll_i'i',\ kY •'!.1I;I..IC Pviy col., G/ Notary iblic ✓� 11 before me this day of as Executive of -for-profit corporation. Attachment 5 Preliminary Engineering Report and Attachments Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September2002 SEPTEMBER 13, 2002 Joe Enzer Snowmass Land Company P.O. Box 6119 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Re: Ranch at Coulter Creek, Recommendations for Onsite Water Systems, Wastewater Systems, Drainage, Utilities and Vehicle Trip Generation. SE Job No. 21185.01 Dear Joe: This letter presents our recommendations for On-site Water Systems, Wastewater Systems (OWS) for individual lots in the proposed Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision. The following information is for use in clarifying requirements and responsibilities, regarding Onsite Wastewater Systems, between individual lot owners and Garfield County. In addition the Drainage, Water, Electrical, Cable and Telephone Services are addressed and the road classification is summarized. Introduction The site comprises approximately 478 acres on mesa within the Coulter Creek drainage east of SpringValley. The site is generally comprised of irrigated agricultural lands and native sagebrush, cedar and pinon rangeland. The site is accessed from County Road 115. The proposed subdivision will consist of 26 lots approximately 4-12 acres each. The proposed residences will be served by a community onsite water system and individual wastewater systems designed pursuant to existing individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) regulations. Onsite Water System Onsite Water will be supplied by a well field located within the property bounds at approximately the area shown on the sketch plan. The maximum flow rate from the wells will be adequate to supply the 92,325 gallons/day necessary during the peak consumption month of June. The water will be chlorinated at a central chlorination facility and pumped into the on site piping system to deliver it to each lot. Each lot will have a service line and a storage tank installed to store water required for the fire protection sprinkler system that will be installed in each residence. Domestic usage per lot is expected to be 1 EQR. The Ranch amenity area will also have a storage tank to store the water required by the barn and livestock. During seasons when the consumption is less than peak the water may be diverted to the storage ponds located on site that have a total capacity of 47.1 Acre Feet (2,051,676 cu ft) of water. Onsite Wastewater Systems We recommend that, at the time of application for building permit, each lot be required to have an engineered OWS plan, designed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. Based on the existing conditions at the site the actual type, dimensions and design of each OWS will vary. Required setbacks from on-site wells, irrigation ditch, dwelling, and property lines must be maintained. Each OWS will be designed site specific based on individual geo-technical evaluations performed by a qualified geo-technical engineer. We would recommend that each component of the OWS be placed on the same lot as the residence but outside of any non -disturbance areas defined for the lot. If lots are to have accessory dwelling units separate or combined systems may be used. However we recommend that each dwelling have its own septic tank. We assume based on the lot size and previous land use that most of the lots on the site are suitable for conventional systems and/or modified engineered systems, however a few of the lots may need advanced treatment components incorporated into their OWS design if certain physical 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Joe Enzer SE. JOB 21185.01 September 13, 2002 Page 2 constraints are encountered. The existing soils vary across the site therefore each lot will need a site specific soil evaluation. We would recommend that a note be placed on the plat similar to the following note: EACH LOT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN ON-SITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN (OWS) TO THE COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND PERMIT. THE INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A STATE OF COLORADO REGISTERED ENGINEER TO RECEIVE AN APPROVED INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY. THE TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL OWS WILL BE SITE SPECIFIC BASED ON EXISTING GARFIELD COUNTY AND STATE ISDS DESIGN CRITERIA AND REQUIRED SITE SPECIFIC GEO-TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS. THE SOIL ABSORPTION/DISPERSAL SYSTEMS ARE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE LOT BOUNDARIES AND OUTSIDE OF ANY NON- DISTURBANCE AREAS DEFINED ON THE LOT. ISDS Operation and Maintenance ,..�.. A properly designed and utilized ISDS system should require minimal maintenance. Several factors influencing the need for maintenance include; actual wastewater flows versus design flows, the volume of kitchen/domestic waste (excluding human waste and toilet paper), excessive household chemicals or other toxic liquids and the physical integrity of the system components. It is recommended that the septic tank, absorption field and dosing tank (if applicable) should be inspected bi-annually. In general, for a properly designed system, septic tanks should be pumped every 2 - 4 years. For systems with a dosing and/or distribution pump system it is recommended that the pumps, valves, siphons, tank, control floats, wires and any other applicable components be visually inspected bi- annually for wear, damage, leaks, or other potential problems. Absorption fields should be maintained with suitable cover and kept free of root invasive plants. Positive surface drainage away from the absorption field should be maintained. Utilities Holly Cross Energy and Q -West have indicated that they will provide electric and telephone services to the project from County Road 115. These services will be buried within the roads and driveways to each of the 26 residences planned for the subdivision. See the attached will serve letters. Drainage Runoff across this site consists of a combination of sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow, and channelized flow. As sheet flow becomes concentrated, surface runoff generally drains toward Coulter Creek. Due to the position of this site on the landscape, the site is not subject to offsite drainage. The ridge that traverses the site near the south and west boundaries is the high point and runoff drains either to the north (Coulter Creek watershed) or to the southwest (Cattle Creek watershed). The Ranch at Coulter Creek development consists of a low density residential community. Twenty six single family residential lots are proposed with several roadways to access these lots. Approximately 64% (305 Ac) of the total area will remain as open space. The 26 lots will occupy (155 Ac) of the total area. Runoff will not significantly increase with development, it is estimated that each lot will contribute a maximum of 4400 square feet of surface that is impervious. The lots and roads will increase the impervious area to a total of 21.7 acre which is less than 5% of the site. The existing drainage will remain substantially unchanged. To maintain the existing natural flow, culverts will be installed in the locations where roadways cross the natural water courses. Culverts will be sized to accommodate the peak runoff caused by a 25 year storm. Culverts are shown of the sketch plan. Joe Enzer SE. JOB 21185.01 September 13, 2002 Page 3 Vehicle Trip Generation The roads within this subdivision will be classified as Rural Access based on the number of vehicle trips per day from each residence. From the publication by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 6th Edition for a single family detached housing an average of 9.5 vehicle trips per day (ADT) is expected. The layout of the subdivision suggests that traffic flow will follow logical routes. We are assuming that traffic from lots 1-15 and Ranch Parcel will use the west entrance 100% of the time. Traffic from lots 16 — 22 will use the west entrance 50% of the time and the east entrance 50% of the time. And traffic from lots 23 — 26 will use the east entrance 100% of the time. The number trips per day on Cattle Creek Ridge Road, therefore will be the average number of lots fronting the road in the subdivision, times the average ADT (9.5) equals 156 ADT classifying the main road (Cattle Creek Ridge Road) per Garfield County regulations as Rural Access and all other cul-de-sacs as Secondary Access. All the roads and cul-de-sacs will have two driving lanes each that are 11 feet wide with 2 foot shoulders on each side for a total width of 26 feet within a 50 foot right-of-way. The extended driveways shown to access lots not on main roads will have two 7 foot wide driving lanes on each side for a total width of 14 feet within a 25 foot right-of- way from a main road or cul-de-sac up to the property line. If you have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call. Mrm. c4. cuuc lc...J-.rI"I nVL I l-MVD.7 LI1LRV I 1 01,0Ss t. N v F.p Z < 3799 HIGHWAY 82 • PO. DRAWER 2150 1 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5491 • FAX (970) 945-4081 N� ss coo 1 April 24, 2002 I ry . O,J4 r . c ' Mr. Roger Madsen 502 Main Street, Suite A3 Carbondale, CO 81623 RE: Lawrence Ranch 'Dear Mr. Madsen: The above mentioned development is within the certificated service area of Holy Cross Energy. Holy Cross Energy has adequate resources to provide electric power to the development, subject to the tariffs, rules and regulations on file. Any power line 1 enlargements, relocations, and new extensions necessary to deliver adequate power to and within the development will be undertaken by Holy Cross Energy upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements. 1 Please advise when you wish to proceed with the development of the electric system for this project. 1 Sincerely, HOLY CROSS ENERGY ' Buzz Quaco, Staking Engineer ' BQ:vw ' Location #66-07 1 1 Qwest: 04/24/2002 To: Yancy Nichol Re: Laurance Ranch Project QWEST will provide telephone facilities to your development as defined in the current PUC Tariffs. Gary Gibson Senior Design Engineer 970-384-0255 Attachment 6 Documentation for Off -Site Wells Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 LEAVENWORTH & KARP, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH SANDER N. KARP DAVID C. HALLFORD DAVID H. McCONAUGHY SUSAN W. LAATSCH JAMES S. NEU JULIE C. BERQUIST NICOLE D. GARRIMONE ANNA S. ITENBERG JOSLYN V. WOOD* *Of Counsel Tim Malloy T.G. Malloy Consulting 181 Orchard Lane Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1011 GRAND AVENUE P. O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO Telephone: (970) 945-2261 Facsimile: (970) 945-7336 ndg@lklawfirm.com May 10, 2002 Re: Laurence Ranch - Proof of Physical Supply Dear Tim: DENVER OFFICE:* WAZEE EXCHANGE BUILDING 81602 1900 WAZEE STREET, STE. 203 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 Telephone: (303) 825-3995 Facsimile: (303) 825-3997 *(Please direct all correspondence to our Glenwood Springs Office) Enclosed are documents from the State Division of Water Resources regarding two existing wells that are located within 1/4 mile of the Laurence Ranch property. The two wells are the Ackerman well (Well Permit No. 171680) and the Grumley well (Well Permit No. 157300). The wells, which are both located east of the Laurence Ranch Property, have a documented pumping rate of 15 g.p.m. Therefore, these wells may provide better information than the test wells that have been drilled on the property. You should note, however, that it is beyond our capability to comment on the adequacy of physical water supply to serve the planned cluster development. Therefore, in addition to the well information included herein, you should obtain an opinion letter from Tom Zancanella, P.E., commenting on the adequacy of physical water supply to serve the property before submitting any information to the Garfield County Planning Department. Please feel free to contact me if you need more information, or if you have any questions or concerns. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & KARP, P.C. L Enclosures cc: Jen Seal-Uncapher (w/ enc.) Scott Miller, Esq. (w/ enc.) Tom Zancanella, P.E. (w/ enc.) 1:12002\Clients\A V LT\Letters\Malloy- I .wpd C 6, . e:41/6 Ahk Nicole D. Garrimone I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REPORT DATE 04/24/02 COLORADO WELL APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS PAGE 4 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES RECEIPT APP DATE STAT DATE NP DATE WELL -X -REFER TRANS ACTIV STAT 356349 06/29/93 / / 08/09/93 000000 CD RC CD NP CD DIV CO FILE NUMBER WD BAS MD NAME 5 23 171680 38 00 00 ACKERMAN ARTHUR III ADDRESS ADDRESS2 CITY ST P 0 BOX 1162 CARBONDALE CO ZIP - EXT PHONE Q10 040 Q160 SEC TWNSHP RANGE PM 81623 0000 ( 303)963-0119 SE SE 6 7 S 87 W S I CASE NUM USES DRLR PUMP 1NST COORDINATES LOT BLK FLG 8 L 1095 N/S 800 S E/W 430 E SUBDIVISION REPT -- WELL -- COMP REPT -- PUMP -- COMP 07/13/93 DATE 06/24/93 / / DATE / / COMMENTS ENG USER 3 SF, 1 AC IRR, DOM ANIMALS, ONLY WELL ON 40 AC, DESC AS SE/4, SE/4 JD2 RAB NWC RECD NBU RECD SBU RECD BENEF USE AMENDED RECD -ABAND-- COMP --DATE --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ACRE -FT TOP/PERF/BOT DEPTH YIELD LEVEL ELEV METER LOG ABAND REQD 105 160 160 15.00 95 EXPIRE DATE STATUTE ID ACRE IR QUAL AQUIFER (S) OWNER DESIGNEE 08/09/95 (6023) 00000 (1) GW (2) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 05-03-02 02:29PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-558 P.17/23 F-634 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v • icarC LL 1=44VJ I'1 .-C t1111i1 h4111al tt<?t MINIG4Mt STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 4 RECEIVED �z WELL PERMIT NUMBER egg /7 / 6,50 Jl1L 13'93 ! OWNERS NAME(S) Arthur Ackerman Mailing Address P . 0 . Boz 1162 City. St. Zip f� Carbondale. Co. 81623 Phon. (30a) 963-0119 y wKttmgainuitco MWITANNWMI Act io c�Ns$t-o1 1. WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED : SE 1/4 SE 114 Sec. 6 TNdp. 7S . Range 67V DISTANCE FROM SEC. LINES : Ft From Sec Line. And Ft. From Sac. Line- Or SUBDIVISION: LOT BLOCK FLUNG (UNrr STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION : — 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD : kir Rotary DATE COMPLETED 06/24/93 . TOTAL DEPTH 160 ft COMPLETED DEPTH 160 ft. LOG n 5. GEOLOGIC : oevo+ Type a ramie§ Mom Cour. Typo Ina .weer imam) 9.0 _ 0.0 4 4 000-100 Volcanic Cla-= 6.5 44 160 100-160 15olcanic Clays, Rocks. Cinders i 7. PLAIN CASING 00(in) Kind Wall Size From Pt) To (h) 7 0 St •_-1 0 .._ 1 0.0 5.5 PVC 0.250 42 105 PE©F CASING as n UT S' 5.5 PVC Il . _z50 105 160 WATER LOCATED : 100-130 8. Filter Pack Material Sire 9. Packer Placement "Nps Depth REMARKS __interval 10. GROUTING RECORD: www Miosis Prwrrrri : mewl t 3 talcs 4t001w 6 gal/ 0-30 ,poured 11 DI FEy O : ., 31;. ...ill. ,A._.. - - 12. WELL TEST DATA : [ j Check Box I1 Test Data is Submttled On Supplemental Form. TESTING METHOD : Static Level : 95 tr. Date/Tlme Measured 06/24/93 Production Rage 15 gpm Pumping Level : Total It. Date/Time Measured 06/24/93 Test Length (his) 2 Remarks : 1.7==.7;;;• cc" and ills r */ e. rue 10 "0704414390- Okril+ia' to 6.02ion 24+1 w MU C71S• me matey dia. axiom* hew 1 r.j ccrsinumg per fry in tN sexna wpm m ar4 R p.rerraM as o nae mKdMv CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Co. Bane: 303-927-4182 Lic. No. 1095 Mailing Address : 90 Hos 4059 Basalt, Co. :.621 Name IT1 (Pews lype a PrP Vayne Shelton / Owner •� l / -.0"40, 4iw Des D6/2 4/93 05-03-02 02:30PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-558 P:21/23 F-634 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver. Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3S81 FAX (3031866-3589 Mr. Wayne Shelton Shelton Drilling Company P. O. Box 1059 Basalt, CO 81621 RE: Monitoring and Observation Hotels) File No. MH- 20898 Owner: Robert Chimento ENGINEER ria con June 21, 1993 Roy Romer Cworttor Ken Salazar Ezecutivt Director Mal D. 54npson Sae Engineer Lic. Na 2� 3 I.D. County -2:5 Basin........__ M.D. SE 1/4 Township 7S Section 6 Range 87W Dear Mr. Shelton: Thank you for your letter of June 17, 1993, notifying this office of your intent to construct the subject monitorint and observation hole(s). The construction of the hole(s) must be completed within three (31 months of the date of thi acknowledgement. Testing and/or pumping shall not exceed a total of seven (71 days unless prior written approval i obtained from the State Engineer. The water diverted during testing shall not be used for beneficial purposes. The we owner or his agent shall be responsible for obtaining permits and complying with all rules and regulations pertaining t the discharge of all fluids produced during testing. The halals) must be plugged within one (1) year after constructio unless a wall permit has been obtained from the Sate Engineer. A copy of this acknowledgement must accompany the drilling rig. Ati work must be in compliance with the Water We and Pump Installation Rules. Construction details, geologic Togs, and test data, in the form of well construction and te: reports (form GWS -311, must be submitted to this office within sixty (60) days of the completion of the work by th licensed contractor or authorized individual. In addition. the well owner should maintain records of any water qualit testing and submit this data to the Division upon plugging of the hole or our request. Please refer to the above file numb, and owner to identify the documents when submitted. Upon completion of plugging. abandonment reports (form GWS -E must be submitted affirming the dates the holes were plugged, the intervals and types of materials used, and by whop the holes were plugged. Acknowledgement of this monitoring and observation hole notice does not indicate that well permits can be approve, If you have any questions, contact this office. JTS:crc cc: Division 5 (with enclosure) Sincerely, iJLdy T. Sappington Water Resources Engineer 05-03-02 02:30PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES '93 14 :23 S-E.TON DRtLL1t6 C17. WATER WELLS 3038662223 303 92? 32301 ELevATOR r1OLE5 (When 914/477 U P.O. BOX 1U58 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 927-4182 6/1T/93 '-2i-EaFF DLIU Dgr Attn: Mr. FHd-- - Colorado Division of Water Resources 313 Sherman St. Room *818 Denver. co. 80203 RE: Monitoring/Observation Well Notification T-558 P.22/23 F-634 TO: 3838623:9-91 TE3f HOEs a.ntlemon, The following information is for Monitoring/Observation Well(s) and/or Ho1es Ire have been requested to drill. Client: Arthur Ackerman Landowners Robert Chimento Location: SE * SEC 6 TTS RS7W 6th PM Number: 1-3 Purpose: Quality and quantity Test for Domestic Usos Start drilling: Late June Hole Diameter: 6.5" Projected Depth(s): upto 500 Peet Aquifers: Tributary Comment: This information will be faxed to your office this date and the original will also be sent this date. Thank you. sincerely, Skip Ackerman (303) 963-0119 ' ACKERMAN HANDCRAFTED LOG HOMES, INC. car6nn:ae co"s; Coloradsion of 818 Centennial Bldg. 1313 Sherman St. Denver, Colorado 80203 Attn. Rich Bell Subject: Validation/Update of Well Permit ## 171680 Dear Rich, As I am crying to sell a tract of land near Carbondale, Colorado, It has come to my attention that it is possible that my well permit has not been updated since it's construction. I believe that I have taken all of the proper steps to have this done. If everything is in place, could you please make sure that everything is in order, and verify it for me. And if there is something I need to do, please let me know right away. I am enclosing copies of everything I have on this for you. Your attention to this would be greatly appreciated. 1994 clECEIRED JUN 2 )91 Best Regards, Skip Ackerman Member Canadian Log Builders Association M1m*pr Armed of f iroMnrQ i .1--- i•-••••l_a:•._ �+ a _►. 05-03-02 02:29PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 *R. -Re-4S Application must be complete where applicable. Type or print in BLACK INK. No overstrikes or erasures unless initialed. T-558 P.19/23 F-634 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES B18 Centennial 8)dg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (X ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER (X)APERMIT TOCONSTRUCT AWELL FOR: IA 1 A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP ASE NO /2/"( I REPLACEMENT FOR NOWATER COURT ( IOTHER ' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN RECEIVED IN29'93 WATER FIESOulia..$ ATE BMW 00141 (1) APPLICANT - mailing address NAME Arthur Ackerman III STREET P.O. Box 1162 CITY Carbondale, Co. 81623 (State) {Zito) TELEPHONE NO. 963-0119 (2) L_OCATION OF PE1OPOSfp WELL County ! Sp ti of the SE '.s, Section 6 Twp. 7 S Rng, 81 W 6 P.M. tN.SI 101A Garfield (3) WAlg R USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 1 5 Average annual amount of ground water 1 .5 to be appropriated lacre-feet):_ Number of acres so be irrigated: 1 Proposed total depth (feet): 1 60 Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Tributary Owner's well designation - GRQUND WAITR 7013i USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0) (X1¢ DOMESTIC (1) I ) INDUSTRIAL (5) ( ) LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (6) ( ) COMMERCIAL 14) ( ) MUNICIPAL (8) I ) OTHER 19) DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) Receipt No.35-63Y1 Basin Dist. 14) RILLR Name Street City Slglton Drilling Co. P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Sr 81 �21 (ZIP) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • This well ,shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. es„ 11 ..l 11 yvA SE /y SE/. 7 .gest COPY available APPLICATION APPROVED u r PERMIT NUMBER PATE ISSUED EXPIRATION. DATE (STATE ENGINEER) 05-03-02 02:29PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-558 P 20/23 F-634 (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on which the water will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. Use the CENTER SECTION (1 section. 640 acres) for the well location, +— -r—.+--f----+-+—+—+- 1 II 4- — -4- I *NORM+. { 1 MILE. 5260 FEET -"Pi ---"PI (6) THE WELL MUST BE LOCATED -BELOW by distances from section lines. „800_ ft from_SOu.tt1 sec. line (nortn or sauce') 430 ft from east . " sec. line )Basi or wast) LOT BLOCK FILING . SUBDIVISION (7) TRACTON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATEDOwner: A. Ackerman No. of acres _ 40 Will this be the only well on this tract? yes 1 + + + • + -1- -E.- 4 + + 1 1 1 11 The scale of the diagram is 2 Inches - 1 mile Each small square represents 40 acre.. (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 7 in from 0 ft to 44 ft 5_ in from 42 ft. to 105 ft Perforated casing 5 in from 105 ft to 160 ft in from ft to WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figares) An acre•foot cowers 1 acre 011111141 1 foot deep 1 cuo:c loot per second lets) . • . 440 gallons per minuu (qpm) A family of 5 will require apprexirn taly 1 ecrrtpoi o1 water per year. 1 acre-foot ... 43.560 cubic fret ... 325.900 gallons. 1.000 Qpm Oumpeq continuo4sly for one Clay produces 4.42 acre -teat. (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS givedistance and direction from old well and plans for plugging it: (10) LAND ON WHICH GBQUE{D WATER WDLL BE USED; Ownerls); Arthur Ackerman III Legal description: SEi SE} Section 6 T7S R8 7W 6th PM (11) GETAILEQ pEScR1QTjOM of the use of ground water: Household use and domestic walls must Indicate type of dispos system to 6e used.All domestic uses includingup to 3 dwellings, 1 acre irrigation non-commercial livestock, with state and county approved septic and leach field. No. of acres. 40 (12) OTHER WATER Meal used on this land, including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right Used for (purpose) Description of land on which used ' (13) THE APPLICANTIS) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE T THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. 1 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(S1 NJMTH StCTIUN LINE Z 7J J O i _ + ...- EAST EC i � III N ie 3 I _ -1- - -__ 1. -•r %st .• a 1- - n 1 c! IIrL l•tr•Y.A.J [ MAC (6) THE WELL MUST BE LOCATED -BELOW by distances from section lines. „800_ ft from_SOu.tt1 sec. line (nortn or sauce') 430 ft from east . " sec. line )Basi or wast) LOT BLOCK FILING . SUBDIVISION (7) TRACTON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATEDOwner: A. Ackerman No. of acres _ 40 Will this be the only well on this tract? yes 1 + + + • + -1- -E.- 4 + + 1 1 1 11 The scale of the diagram is 2 Inches - 1 mile Each small square represents 40 acre.. (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 7 in from 0 ft to 44 ft 5_ in from 42 ft. to 105 ft Perforated casing 5 in from 105 ft to 160 ft in from ft to WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figares) An acre•foot cowers 1 acre 011111141 1 foot deep 1 cuo:c loot per second lets) . • . 440 gallons per minuu (qpm) A family of 5 will require apprexirn taly 1 ecrrtpoi o1 water per year. 1 acre-foot ... 43.560 cubic fret ... 325.900 gallons. 1.000 Qpm Oumpeq continuo4sly for one Clay produces 4.42 acre -teat. (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS givedistance and direction from old well and plans for plugging it: (10) LAND ON WHICH GBQUE{D WATER WDLL BE USED; Ownerls); Arthur Ackerman III Legal description: SEi SE} Section 6 T7S R8 7W 6th PM (11) GETAILEQ pEScR1QTjOM of the use of ground water: Household use and domestic walls must Indicate type of dispos system to 6e used.All domestic uses includingup to 3 dwellings, 1 acre irrigation non-commercial livestock, with state and county approved septic and leach field. No. of acres. 40 (12) OTHER WATER Meal used on this land, including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right Used for (purpose) Description of land on which used ' (13) THE APPLICANTIS) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE T THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. 1 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(S1 IIForm No. GWS -25 1 APPLICANT 1 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 ARTHUR ACKERMAN III PO BOX 1162 CARBONDALE CO 81623 ( 303) 963-0119 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 171680 DIV. 5 CNTY. -23 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD.. Lot: Block: Filing: Subdiv: APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD -COUNTY SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 6 -Twp 7 S RANGE 87 W 6th P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION UNES 800 Ft. from South Section Line 430 Ft. from East Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDmONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material. injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 17. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 40 acres described as the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 6, Twp. 7 South, Rng. 87 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside three (3) single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one acre of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. • .-1"e" APPROVED JD2 �(,iQ State Engineer Receipt No. 0356349 DATE ISSUED AUG 0 9 1993 By EXPIRATION DATE AUG 0 9 19% III REPORT DATE 04/24/02 COLORADO WELL APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS PAGE 4 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES II RECEIPT APP DATE STAT DATE NP DATE WELL -X -REFER TRANS ACTIV STAT I 356349 06/29/93 / / 08/09/93 000000 CD RC CD NP CD DIV CO FILE NUMBER WD BAS MD NAME 5 23 171680 38 00 00 ACKERMAN ARTHUR III IIADDRESS ADDRESS2 CITY ST P 0 BOX 1162 CARBONDALE CO IZIP - EXT PHONE Q10 Q40 0160 SEC TWNSHP RANGE PM 81623 0000 ( 303)963-0119 SE SE 6 7 S 87 W S CASE NUM USES DRLR PUMP INST COORDINATESI LOT BLK FLG 8 L 1095 N/S 800 S E/W 430 E I SUBDIVISION REPT -- WELL -- COMP REPT -- PUMP -- COMP 07/13/93 DATE 06/24/93 / / DATE / / COMMENTS ENG USER I3 SF, 1 AC IRR, DOM ANIMALS, ONLY WELL ON 40 AC, DESC AS SE/4, SE/4 JD2 RAB NWC RECD NBU RECD SBU RECD BENEF USE AMENDED RECD -ABAND-- COMP 1 --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ACRE -FT TOP/PERF/BOT DEPTH YIELD LEVEL ELEV METER LOG ABAND REQD I105 160 160 15.00 95 EXPIRE DATE STATUTE ID ACRE IR QUAL AQUIFER (S) OWNER DESIGNEE II 08/09/95 (6023) 00000 (1) GW (2) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iForm No. GWS -7 ti 12/99 1 EXEMPT PERMIT INFORMATION SHEET STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 821 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 Fax (303) 866-3589 INFORMATION FOR WELL PERMITS APPROVED PURSUANT TO CRS 37-92-602 (HOUSEHOLD, DOMESTIC, LIVESTOCK AND EXEMPT COMMERCIAL USES) ▪ Carefully read the conditions of approval on your well permit. The conditions and the information on this ▪ information sheet must be complied with in order for the permit to remain valid. THE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE IS TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE ISSUED. The well must be constructed and 'evidence of it's construction must be received by this office in the form of a Well Construction and Test report from the well construction contractor confirming that the well was constructed prior to expiration of the well permit. The well permit number is located in the upper right hand corner of the permit, and the expiration date is located in the 'lower right hand comer. The expiration date of the permit may be extended one year at a time at the discretion of the State Engineer for good cause shown. If an extension of time is necessary to construct the well, a written request for the extension of time must be received by this office prior to the expiration date of the well 'permit. In the request, you must provide the well permit number, your name and mailing address and the reasons why the well has not been constructed and when it will be constructed. No fee is required for this type of permit extension. "'Water well construction and pump installation contractors are specifically licensed in Colorado to perform these specialized tasks. It is illegal for contractors who do not hold these licenses to construct wells and/or install pumping equipment in or on wells. The well must be constructed and the pump installed by contractors with current 'license(s) issued by the State of Colorado unless exempted as described on the reverse side. Please ask to see their license(s). Backhoe Operators and Licensed Plumbers may or may not hold the respective Well Construction and/or Pump Installation licenses. Please be aware of this when you contract to construct the well and install 1 pumping equipment. The well construction report including a test of the well yield must be submitted to the office of the State Engineer within sixty (60) days of completion of the work or within seven days after expiration of the permit, whichever is earlier. The pump installation report including a pumping system test must be submitted within 1 sixty (60) days of completion of the work. The contractor(s) must provide you with a copy of the work report(s) filed with the State Engineer. The Well Construction and Test Report, Form Number GWS -31 and the Pump Installation and Test Report, Form Number GWS -32 are available from the Division of Water Resources offices. Additional Iinformation regarding well construction, pump installation, required testing and well plugging and sealing regulations are found on the reverse side of this sheet. IYou have been provided with at least two copies of the well permit. Keep a copy for your records. There is also a copy for the pump installation contractor. Copies have been sent to the driller if you indicated a driller license number on the application, or two additional copies have been enclosed. You may make additional copies for the well construction contractor if you select one different from the one indicated in your application. IThe original permit is on file in the Denver office Records Section. Copies may be obtained for a fee of 50 cents per page. Statutes require that any change of mailing address or ownership be reported to the State Engineer. Form I number GWS -11 is used both by new owners to report ownership changes and current owners to report address changes. If you have questions, contact the Denver Office, or the Division Office in the area where your well is located. 1 DIVISION 1 800 8th Ave Rm 321 Greeley CO 80631 I(303) 352-8712 DIVISION 5 50633 US Hwy 6 & 24 IGlenwood Springs CO 81601 (970) 945-5665 1 DIVISION 2 310 E Abriendo Suite B Pueblo CO 81004 (719) 542-3368 DIVISION 6 625 So. Lincoln Ave. Steamboat Springs CO 80477 (970) 879-0272 DIVISION 3 422 4th St Alamosa CO 81101 (719) 589-6683 DIVISION 7 Suite 205 701 Camino Del Rio Durango CO 81302 (970) 247-1845 DIVISION 4 1540 E Niagara Montrose CO 81402 (970) 249-6622 DENVER OFFICE 1313 Sherman St Denver CO 80203 (303 866-3581 05-03-02 02:29PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-558 P.18/23 F-634 Form. No. GWS -25 • APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO ENVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Contemn's' Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Coloqido 80203 (303) eslg.1 ARTHUR ACKERMAN 111 P 0 BOX 1162 CARBONDALE CO 81623 ( 303)963-0119 1095 WEU- PERMIT NUMBER 171680 - DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD La: Block: Filing: SWAM APPROV D WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY 8E 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 6 Twp 7 S RANGE 87 W 6th P.M. DIsTANCj;s FROM SECTION ONES 800 Ft from South 430 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WEU- ISSUANCE E -ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES 140T CONFER A WATER RIGHT colminc [{s Of APP flOylf i, 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material Injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be In compliance with the Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 17. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3) (b)!7n (A) as the only wen on a tract of lend of 40 acres described as me SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 6, Twp. 7 South, Rng. 87 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside three (3) single family dwellings, the Irrigation of not more than one acre of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rata shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of me non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system In which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 fast from the location specified on this permit. C- t3 APPROVED JD2 po'.rai"t t+zo f ^aTc Iec1ICA—jiu.ri Q.Q-__i{ 2 410 cYa1DATJ tbI r1ATc ■lir A n that 05-03-02 UZ,ZaIM hKUM-UIVIJIUIV ut WAItK KtsuuK..tJ aua000ccca r. 1 I/ L J v• '' ' tI3iCLL Ptia1l1N-t. 1P* Mill til ttt. t 1'1kI' 4I'! 1- STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF TRE STATE ENGINEER FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIVED 1.' WELL PERMIT NUMBER wings" l b g 0 JUL 13'93 OWNERS NAME(5) Arthur ickernan Milling Address P . 0 . Soz 1162 City, St Zip Cc.D nriala, Co. 01623 3! '-3— 19 wA`M usl s ill 00031-61-03Phone WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED : SE 114 SE 1/4 Sec. 6 Twp. 7S . Range 8 7V DISTANCE FROM SEC. LINES : Ft From Sec Line. And Ft From Svc. Line. Or SUBDIVISION: LOT BLOCK FFUNG (UNf1) STREET ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION : .4• GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD : lir Rotary DATE COMPLETED 06/24/93 . TOTAL DEPTH 160 ft. COMPLETED DEPTH 160 ft. LAG 9. HOLE DIAM. (In) FROM (ft) TO (ft) 5. GEOLOGIC : Nob 7}p• a rwarie tom.. Cam rips aro warn Loam) 9.0 0.0 44 , 000-100 Volcanic Claus 6.5 44 _ 160 100-160 Volcalnic Clams )mks, Cindsrm 7. PLAIN CASING OD(in) Kind Wen Size From (1t) To (It) 7,0 Stge1 fl 4Q 0.0 34 5.5 PVC - 0.250 42 105 s PERF -MING ' Scr n 01$till..: 5.5 PVC 0.250 105 160 WATER LOCATED : 100-130 8. Filter Pack Malarial Size Interval 9. Packer Placement Depth 10. GROUTING RECORD: Phren ori REMARKS : memo Amami Dan*. _Iran. wept, 3 saes 6 gal/ 0-30 Doureld 1 D FEN 0 . ._ Rs; _.ul. ..r_s • -. 12. WELL TEST DATA : 1) Chock Bcst 11 Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental Form. TESTING METHOD : Static Levi : 95 It Date/Time Measured 06/24/93 Production Rale 15 glom Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 06/24/93 Test Length (hts) 2 Remarks : ass rued itio gPitirrunirriel, hin l indivnur to antrib iw.oi..na iit th is. Imo 10 nrkra row• Ptnue M w 6fictcn k4-4-10ZIMAS. nr riekriJ d trine gills ontl tlinin dil Y aria ulrs * .ay n tr* Nona ape and *proms m a noworr mmor.I CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Co. Phone: 303-927-4182 Lic.No. 1.095 Mailin• Address : PO Boz 1059 •_ t Co. ::. 62 Nano filo (Plass 1Ype or P'* Vague Shelton / Omer ........ - 1:7 t / / 1-.-r,/ r Orr D6/24/93 Ob -U3 -UL UL: WM r•KUM-UIVIJIUN Ur• nAItK KtJUUKL taR.k3•Re••� • Application must be complete where applicable. Type or print in BLACK INK. No overstrikes or erasures unless initialed. aUaOUOLLLO I.ia r•IcILQ 1 WO4 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (X ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER (I(► A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL. FOR: ( ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP RECENED X29,83 VUOIMMIIIM DOM WATER COURT CASE NO r?/ ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO.1OTHER ' G (1) APPLICANT • mailing address NAME Arthur Ackerman III STREET p•O. Box 1162 CITY Carbondale, Co. 81623 (same) TELEPHONE NO 963-0119 {ZIP) (2) LOCATION OF PrIOPOSFD WELL. County Garfield J 81 of the SE X, Section 6 Twp. 7 3. Rng. 87 W 6 P.M (14.51 IE_wr FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Receipt No 331-3,3 (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 15 Average annual amount of ground water 1 . 5 to be appropriated tacre•feet)• Number of acres to be irrigated: 1 Proposed total depth (feet) : 160 Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Tributary Owner's well designation ri m:alD WATER TO (E USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0) {(Z DOMESTIC (1) 1 ) INDUSTRIAL (51 ( 1 LIVESTOCK (2) t 1 IRRIGATION (61 ( ) COMMERCIAL 14) ( ) MUNICIPAL (8) I ) OTHER (91 DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) Basin Dist. t4) DRILLER Name Street city Shglton Drilling Co. P.O. Box 1059 ES a s 41S. , X 3(.816 21 (Z)pi CONQITIQNS Of APPPOY►AL • This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. y0A SEXY SE/7 C�et4r.lr. .gest Copy Available APPLICATION APPROVED PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED EXPIRATION DATE (STATE ENGINEER) 05-03- UZ,CaeM MKUM-UIVIJIUN Ur WAItK KtJUUKL JUJt1U0LLL7 1-7Uo r•GU/ LJ r-1.144 (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on which the water 'will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. Use the CENTER SECTION 11 section, 640 acres) for the well location. - -r —.± — -1— -- + — + - -b - -i- - -}- 1 14- 1 MILE. 5280 FEET -- -- —,- f + i NORTH SECTION LI E t - .1. I 1 1 t I _I + + SOUTH T✓:CTION LINE + - 4- 1 1 The scale of the diagram is 2 Inches - 1 mile Each small square represents 40 acre... *NORTH+. (6) THE WELL MUST BE LOCATEELUW by distances from section lines. 800_ 430 ft from ft from _50U.t11 . sec. line (norin or soutt7 east - ' sec. line 11411 or Weil) LOT_ BLOCK FILING . SUBDIVISION (7) TReCT ON WHICH WEU. WILL QE (..00ATEPOwner: A. Ackerman No. of acres 90 Will this be the only well on this tract? Yes T (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 7 in. from 0 f to 44 ft 5 in from 4 2 h. to 1 0 5 ft Perforates casing 5 in from 1 0 5 ft to 1 6 0 ft in from ft to WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figures) An acre.foot covers 1 acre of lend 1 foot deep 1 cubic foo, per second Icfs) . , . 440ga/tons par minute fgpm) A family of 5 will require approximately 1 acre -toot of water per *Mer - 1 acre-foot ... 43,560 cubic feet ... 325.900 gallons. 1,000 ppm Dumped continuously for one day produces 4,42 acre -feet - (9) FOR REP1.ACEMENT WELLSgivedistance end direction from old well and plans for plugging it; (10) LAND ON WHICH Qf O9ND WATER WILL BE USED; Owner(s): Arthur Ackerman III Legal description:. S S Section 6 T7S RB7W 6th PM Household use and domestic wolfs must Indicate type of dispose No. of acres' 40 (11) O TAILED D$CRIPTIOf4 of the use of ground water: system to be used. X11 domestic uses including up to 3 dwellings 1 acre irrigation non-commercial livestock, with state and county approved septic and leach field. (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this land, including wefts. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right Used for (purpose! Description of land on which used (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON 1S TRUE T9 THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATVRf OF APPL/CANT(SI Z Z I: I 1 + 1 — .-.— I1 1 1 { — m m 1.1 ow 1.. Iii i I - -1 I 1 - -~ --- -1- 1 1 . a r ^ *NORTH+. (6) THE WELL MUST BE LOCATEELUW by distances from section lines. 800_ 430 ft from ft from _50U.t11 . sec. line (norin or soutt7 east - ' sec. line 11411 or Weil) LOT_ BLOCK FILING . SUBDIVISION (7) TReCT ON WHICH WEU. WILL QE (..00ATEPOwner: A. Ackerman No. of acres 90 Will this be the only well on this tract? Yes T (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 7 in. from 0 f to 44 ft 5 in from 4 2 h. to 1 0 5 ft Perforates casing 5 in from 1 0 5 ft to 1 6 0 ft in from ft to WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figures) An acre.foot covers 1 acre of lend 1 foot deep 1 cubic foo, per second Icfs) . , . 440ga/tons par minute fgpm) A family of 5 will require approximately 1 acre -toot of water per *Mer - 1 acre-foot ... 43,560 cubic feet ... 325.900 gallons. 1,000 ppm Dumped continuously for one day produces 4,42 acre -feet - (9) FOR REP1.ACEMENT WELLSgivedistance end direction from old well and plans for plugging it; (10) LAND ON WHICH Qf O9ND WATER WILL BE USED; Owner(s): Arthur Ackerman III Legal description:. S S Section 6 T7S RB7W 6th PM Household use and domestic wolfs must Indicate type of dispose No. of acres' 40 (11) O TAILED D$CRIPTIOf4 of the use of ground water: system to be used. X11 domestic uses including up to 3 dwellings 1 acre irrigation non-commercial livestock, with state and county approved septic and leach field. (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this land, including wefts. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right Used for (purpose! Description of land on which used (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON 1S TRUE T9 THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATVRf OF APPL/CANT(SI 05 -03 -OZ UZ:30PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES JUJtl00444.1 I-0015 r.41/44 r-044 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3581 FAX (303) 866-3589 Mr. Wayne Shelton Shelton Drilling Company P. 0. Box 1059 Basalt, CO 81621 RE: Monitoring and Observation Hole(s) File No. MH- 20898 Owner: Robert Chimento STATE EN 3INEER Fa COPY June 21, 1993 Roy Romer Corer Ken Salazar Exec,rrlve Director Mal D. 5;mpson Sine Engineer Lie. No. 3�' i_D..�.... County 23 .,.-1. e ; Basin M.D. SE 1/4 Township 7S Section 6 Range 87W Dear Mr. Shelton: Thank you for your letter of June 17, 1993, notifying this office of your intent to construct the subject monitoring and observation hole(s). The construction of the hole(s) must be completed within three (3) months of the date of this acknowledgement. Testing and/or pumping shall not exceed a total of seven (7) days unless prior written approval is obtained from the State Engineer. The water diverted during tasting shall not be used for beneficial purposes. The wel' owner or his agent shall be responsible for obtaining permits and complying with all rules and regulations pertaining to the discharge of all fluids produced during testing. The holes) must be plugged within one (1) year after construction unless a well permit has been obtained from the State Engineer. A copy of this acknowledgement must accompany the drilling rig. All work must be in compliance with the Water Wel and Pump Installation Rules. Construction details, geologic logs, and test data, in the form of well construction and tes reports (form GWS -31), must be submitted to this office within sixty (60) days of the completion of the work by the licensed contractor or authorized individual. In addition, the well owner should maintain records of any water qualit' testing and submit this data to the Division upon plugging of the hole or our request. Please refer to the above file numbe and owner to identify the documents when submitted. Upon completion of plugging, abandonment reports !form GWS -9 must be submitted affirming the dates the holes were plugged, the intervals and types of materials used, and by whon the holes were plugged. Acknowledgement of this monitoring and observation hole notice does not indicate that well permits can be approved If you have any questions, contact this office. JTS:crc cc: Division 5 (with enclosure) Sincerely, \.%1. Or/5% dy T. Sappington Water Resources Engineer 05-03-02 02:30PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3UJeeec[cS I -sod r.ccica r-ooa JW 1? '93 14!20 SI-ELTON LR I L L I Fb CO. 303 92? 3381 TO: 383 866 3583 —T. WATER WELLS ELEVATOR NOLEES TEST HOLS P.O. SOX 1 D58 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 927-4182 6/17/93 DL D: Attn: Mr. Fred—hoot- Colorado Division of Water Resources 313 Sherman St. Room *818 Denver, co. 80203 RE: monitoring/Observation Well Notification a•nt 1 Asn , The following information is for Monitoring/0bsery;tion Well(s) and/or Holes w• have been requested to drill. Client; Arthur Ackerman Landowner: Robert Chimento Location: SE SEC 6 T7S R87W 6th PM Number: 1-3 Purpose: quality and Quantity Test for Domestic Uses Start drilling: Late June Hole Diemeter: 6.5" Projected Depth(s); upto S00 Peet Aquifers: Tributary Comment: This information will be faxed to your office this date and the original will also be sent this date. Thank you. Sincerely, 0.74-a Skip ki(ernnan (333) 963.0119 AC KERMAN HANDCRAFTED LOG HOMES, INC. Colorad- sion of 818 Centennial Bldg. 1313 Sherman St. Denver, Colorado 80203 Attn. Rich Bell Subject: Validation/Updace of Well Permit # 171680 Dear Rich, 1994 P. O. Box 1: Carbondale, CO Bit RECD JtI 2 Pat As I am trying to sell a tract of land near Carbondale, Colorado, It has come to my attention that it is possible that my well permit has not been updated since it's construction. I believe that I have taken all of the proper steps to have this done. If everything is in place, could you please make sure that everything is in order, and verify it for me. And if there is something I need to do, please let me know right away. 1 am enclosing copies of everything I have on this for you. Your attention to this would be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Skip Ackerman Member Canadian log Builders Association Aklm w katr of IlirAMnre Qe. i ilte_jen " .a a ►. REPORT DATE 04/24/02 COLORADO WELL APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS PAGE 7 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES RECEIPT APP DATE STAT DATE NP DATE WELL -X -REFER TRANS ACTIV STAT 306109 10/16/89 05/17/90 06/14/90 000000 CD WA CD NP CD AR DIV CO FILE NUMBER WD BAS MD NAME 5 23 157300 38 00 00 GRUMLEY LOVELL ADDRESS 0723 121 RD ZIP - EXT PHONE 81623 0000 ( ) ADDRESS2 CITY ST CARBONDALE CO 010 040 0160 SEC TWNSHP RANGE PM NE SW 5 7 S 87 W S CASE NUM USES DRLR PUMP INST COORDINATES LOT BLK FLG H L 1095 N/S 1700 S E/W 1600 W SUBDIVISION REPT -- WELL -- COMP REPT -- PUMP -- COMP 08/24/90 DATE 07/10/90 / / DATE / / COMMENTS ENG USER MAM NWC RECD NBU RECD SBU RECD BENEF USE AMENDED RECD -ABAND-- COMP --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE-- --DATE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ACRE -FT TOP/PERF/BOT DEPTH YIELD LEVEL ELEV METER LOG ABAND REQD 80 200 203 15.00 80 EXPIRE DATE STATUTE ID ACRE IR QUAL AQUIFER (S) OWNER DESIGNEE / / ( ) 00000 (1) GW (2) 'Form No. GWS -25 1 APPLICANT 1 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 ©JG 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 157300 DIV. 5 LOVELL GRUMLEY 0723 121 RD CARBONDALE, CO 81623 IPERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL 1 1 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BA% MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION COUNTY GARFIELD 1' NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 5 Twp 7 S , Range 87 W S P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1700 Ft. from South Section Line 1600 Ft. from West Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a residential site of 6 acres described as that portion of the Tots 9 and 10 of Sec. 5, Twp. 7 S., Rng. 87 W. of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, being more particularly 111 described on the attached exhibit A. 3) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside a single family dwelling and the watering of the users noncommercial domestic animals. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 4) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 277 ?77. a- /Z-90 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPROVED: MAM Receipt No, 0306109 44.146..., DATE ISSUED.)UN 1 4 1990 at/Z By JUN 14 1992 EXPIRATION DATE 0-1.14-1.14 UL:L(rM rKUM'UIVIJIUIV Ur WAICK KtJUUKLCJ ow000ccco 1—oao r • U9/ LJ r -ow Form Noa , OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS -25, , - COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 518 Cantennim Bldg.. 1313 Snerman SL. Denver. Colorado 88203 (303) 886.3s81 APPLICANT 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 1 573®® DN. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD LOVELL GRUMLEY 0723 121 RD CARBONDALE, CO 81623 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL APPROVED WELL LOCATION COUNTY GARFIELD NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 5 Twp 7 S , Range 87 W S P.M. pISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 1700 FL from South Section line 1600 Ft. from West Section Line ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92.602(3)0b)(10(A) as the only well on a residential site of 6 acres described as that • portion of the lots 9 and 10 of Sec. 5, Twp. 7 S., Rng. 87W. of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, being more particularly descnbed on the attached exhibit 'A'. 3) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside a single family dwelling and the watering of the users noncommercial domestic animals. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 4) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 5) • The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. jam. 277. 8- /2- ID 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 uo—ua—uc uc:clrM v1RJ•5•Rcy�76 • Application must :. 'u be complete where applicable. Type or print in BLACK INK. No overstrikes or erasures unless initialed. rmum-yirniuN ur MGR RCJVUM.Ca JUJGUULLLJ I-JJY f�� tt//��/ LJ f -YJ•/ COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 Gnr11 FOR: M350 Elillitaa (a+ PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ( X) A PERMIT TO uSE GROUND WATER ( x) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ( A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO ( )OTHER OCT 1 6 '89 WATER RESOURCES 8TATEENSPIEER ODLO. 10-16-89 10:40 A 032472 60.00 4WX00P P0011 TIL 60.00 WATER COURT CASE NO cHr n.nn CHEQUE 60.00 (1) APPLICANT - mailing address NAME Lovell and Nancy Grumley STREET 0723 121 Rd. CITY Carbondale, CO 81623 (S[ate) 303-945-5232 TELEPHONE NO (zip) (2) LOCATION QF PIIOPQ$€O County Garfield N N N.E. Y. of the S .W. Y., Section 5 Twp. 7 S Rng. 87 W I 6th P M iN.S1 le" (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 1S/gpm Average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated (acre-feet): 0.3 acre/feet Na Number of acres to be irrigated: 0 Proposed total depth (fees): 300 ' Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Tributary Owner's well designation N/A GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: `•( X) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY • no irrigation (0) ( ) DOMESTIC (1) ( ) INDUSTRIAL (5) ( ) LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (5) ( ) COMMERCIAL (4) ( 1 MUNICIPAL (8) ( ) OTHER (91 DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: 00 NOT 1eiii1TE INITHIS COLUMN CL -1. 0A6109 Receipt No.00 /a /D1 / (4) DRILLER Name Street City Shelton Drilling Co. 20474 State Hwy. 82, P.O. Box 1(JS-9 Basalt, CO 81621 Telephone No. 303-91112 (Suets) Lie. No (2,0 1095 Basin Dist. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • This well shall be used in such a way as to cause • no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. T APPLICATION APPROVED PERMIT NUMBER /57 DATE ISSUED EXPIRATION DATE (STATE ENGINEER) BY c— c�- n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 uu-ua-uc uc•.IrIYI rnym-VIYIJIun ur nnIGr ncavuhV.G4 '(6) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on (6) THE WELL•MUST RE LOCAtEP BELOW. • Use whicli►e CENT(1 section,640 acres) for the h the water SECTION indicated diagram l ocabelow. t on. \,.by distances from section lines. 1700 ft from South sec.:line 1 — — - _ _i_. _ + — _4_ _ -f _ — -I_ (north or south) I 1 1600 ft from west sec. line td-- 1 MILE, 6280 FEET ---f- (east o. wecq 1- + + ± + + + + LOT N/A BLOCK N/A FILING a N/A I 1 SUBDIVISION N/A -• — , NOpTH SECTION LINE + -1- RA I I , I I I ( � rn Q m 1 is I I Z I I f I (7) TCT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE I 1 LOCATED Owner: Lovell' & Nancy Grum +NORTH+ or "1--1- \.6 . 0 Will this be No. of acres yes Z I - try: only well on this tract? -- + -f " (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM 1 11 Plain Casing •-1-- -I— "` +' _ I 7 in. from 0 ft to '3 0 ft 1 1 5 4-12 in Pram 30 ft. to 250 ft• __.. _f. Perforated casing +' --"I'" 5OUTHSE�TION LINE 1 I 1 5 l/2 in.from 250 ft. to 300 ft + _1,. + + + + in from ft to .t 1 1 1 I (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELL.Sgivedistance and direction from old well and plans for plugging 4 ..t.. ___ +_±—+-4- — 4- --I- it: N/A • The scale of the diagram is 2 incli4s 1;•mil Each small square represents 40 acres. WATER EQUivALENTS TABLE (Ro.need Fioures) An acre-foot covers 1 acre of lata 1 toot clamp 1 cubic foot per second (cfs) ...449 gallons par minute lgprrd A family of 5 will require approximately 1 acre-foot of water per year. 1 acre-foot ... 43.560 cubic feet ... 325.900 gallons. 1.000 gpm pumped continuously for one may produces 4.42 acre-feet. (10) LANA ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: Owner(s)• Lovell & Nancy Grumley Legal description: See attached '- (11) Q. TAlI.ED DE$RIPTION of the use of ground water: Household use and domestic walls mist indicate lyo,Li of disposal_ system to be used. Household use only . ' County and State approved septic tank and leach field No. of acres* 6.0 (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this land. including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Description of land on which used Type or right Used for (purpose) N/A (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT'S) 1.1J YL YL •LII AI wJr. _::.» I nVAI 11 Y I J I V11 VI An f Ln RLJv✓n•.LJ THIS FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF THE WORK DESCRIBED HERE- ON. TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK. WELL OWNER _Bud & ADDRESS 0723 12'1 DATE COMPLETED COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street - Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT PERMIT NUMBER 15:7101) I-3-"736 Nancy Cr- trnieV NE `4 of the _ SE • 1• SIM._—.LEA % of Sec 5 Carhondalp} $1623 T. 7S R. 87W 6 WELL LOG 7/10 199_0_ HOLE DIAMETER From To Type and Color of Material Water Loc. 000 080 080 200 • Use - Clay Clay, Sands i IJ r • J /t••• /• • •-• 4 TOTAL DEPTH 203 additional pages necessary to complete log. 9 in from 0 to 30 ft, 6- 5 in. from 3Q to 200 ft in trom to ft DRILLING METHOD jrARptary CASING RECORD: Plain Casing Size _—_ & kind steel from nan to 030 Size & kind er from -023— to 2n1 Size & kind from Size & kind Size & kind Size Perforated Casing rivr. to from 1..8.11_ to 2QO from & kind from GROUTING RECORD Material _cement t 6g1 / sk Intervals 10/30 Placement Method to to Gravity GRAVEL PACK: Size Interval TEST DATA Date Tested Static Water Level Prior to Test 7/10 80 ,19 Type of Test Pump air compressor Length of Test 2 hauls Sustained Yield (Metered) 15 Final Pumping Water Level total 05-03-02 02:2TPM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT Pump Make Type Powered by HP Pump Serial No. Motor Serial No. Date I nstalleo Pump Intake Depth Remarks -WELL TEST DATA WITH PERMANENT PUMP Date Tested Static Water Level Prior to Test Length of Test . _ Hours Sustained yield (Metered) GPM Pumping Water Level Remarks 3038662223 T-558 P 03/23 F-634 TOTAL DEPTH Y r -� T CONE OF PEPRESSIOP CONTRACTORS STATEMENT The undersigned, being duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that he is the contractor of the well or pump installation described hereon; that he has read the statement made hereon; knows the content thereof, and that the sa ; ' rue of hi edge. Signature State of Colorado, County of � i_zre Subscribed.and sworn to before me this 12.. day of a zd ael My Commission expires: j40/r 12d. 19 9:3 Notary Public - /-1//1 License No. 16.73 -- SS o A ^mo 19 �(/O •+ n -"yam �`�� ' I FORM TO BE MADE OUT 1N QUADRUPLICATE; WHITE FORM must be an original copy on both- sides and-signea:%' WHITE AND GREEN eop,ee mutt be filed with the State Engineer. PINK COPY is for the Owner and YELLOW COPY is for the Driller. 05-03-02 02:28PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES a May 16, 1990 3038662223 T-558 P.08/23 F-634 CARL R. CARMICHAEL P.O. BOX 1367 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 303-963-9381 Office of the State Engineer Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street - Room 818 Denver, CO 80203 TO: Mel Melley or Whomever It May Concern RE: Grumley Well Permit Application RECEIPT NO.: 306109 RECEIVED MAY 1 7 1990 0MTFA 8✓`seuaca iia gMtgFin I am resubmitting the Grumley Well Application to your office for approval, along with the additional documentation requested, namely a copy of the Garfield County Commissioners Resolution approving the Grumley Subdivision Exemption, a copy of the Exemption Plat, and a letter from James R. Hall of your office agreeing to issue the permit. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Please contact me if you need further information. Car R. Carmichael, P.L.S. P.S. Please note the Plat contains a note restricting well use as James Hall requested. Enclosures 05-03-02 02:28PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038652223 T-558 P.12/23 F-634 ,._ ,. { V L1. -VL ( •19• Aril IN" 'J 14.7u REC. 0 411938 KILDRED ALSDORF, COUNTY CLERK GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO )ss County of Garfield eoox ?;y"; pic637 At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held at the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse in Glenwood Springs on Monday , the 16th day ofApril A. D . 1990, there were present: Marian I _ Smith _ _ ___ , Commissioner Chairman Arnold L. Mackley , Commissioner Elmer(8uckeld Arbanev , Commissioner Don peFor0 , County Attorney Mi l4recl l sd carf , Clerk to the Board Chuck beschtaftp , County Administrator when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, wit: MAY1 1 7 1990 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE GARFT Nat COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS FOR CHARLES AND VICKI GRUMLEY. WHEREAS, Charles and Vicki Grumley, have petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, for an exemption from the definition of the terms "subdivision" and "subdivided land" under C.R.S. 1973, 30-28-101 (10) (a) -(d), as amended, and the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado, adopted April 23, 1984, Section 8:00 through 8:60 and for the division of a 252 acre tract as described in Book 779, Page 676-678, as filed in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado into two tracts of approximately 6 acres and 246 acres, more or less, which proposed. divided tracts are more practically described as follows: TRACT A: See attached legal description for Lot 1 TRACT B: The tract of land remaining with Lot 1 removed from the attached legal marked Tract B (in the State of Colorado and the County of Garfield); and WHEREAS, the Petitioners have demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that the proposed division does not fall within the purposes of Part I, Article 28, Title 30, Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, as amended, for the reason that the division does not warrant further subdivision review; and WHEREAS, the Petitioners have demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, proof of a legal and adequate source of water on each of said RESOLUTION NO. 40-040 05-03-02 02:26PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 303e65ZZZ3 1-55e N.11/4 r -era BOOK 777 7 P►GE 638 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the division of the above described tracts "A" and "B" from the above described 252 acre tract is hereby exempted from such definitions and said tract may be divided into said tracts "A" and •'a" and may be conveyed in the form such tracts "A" and "8", all as is more fully described above; however, this exemption is granted on the condition and with the expressed understanding and agreement of the petitioner that no further exemption be allowed on said tracts "A" and "8" and that a copy of the instrument or instruments of conveyance when recorded shall be filed with this Resolution. Dated this 16th day of April —, A.D.1990 ATTEST: lerk of the Boar GA.RFIELD,COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD, COUIhiTY, COLORADO Chairman Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote.: ArripIrj 14 T 'pith Njarkley • Aye Aye Aye STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield ) I , County Clerk and ex - officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and tor the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 19 County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 05-03-02 0Z:28PM FROM—DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES ahldbbC4CS 04/13/90 10:33 SECRETARIAL SuC 303-963-2390 1-nb r.Ua/ r—bs4 RECEIVE MAY17, IWO CHAT I 'TAU -1194202 P. Pa 6Sg 777 r±sf 639 NOTES: 1. The basis of bearing for this survey is a bearing of N. 89°53'54" E. between the Southwest Corner of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, to the Southeast -Corner of said Section 5. 2. Engineered foundations and individual sewage disposal systems may be required. 3. This 6.00 + acre lot is being subdivided out of the Vicki Grumiey and Charles Grumlcy property as described in Book 749, Pages 676-678, as recorded in the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's Office_ 4. designates a rebar and cap set by L_S.. #24303 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LOT 1 A Tract of land situate in Section 5, being a part of Lots 9 and 10, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6th Principal meridian, County of Garfield, State f oColorado, said Tract being more particularly Commencing at a point from which the S.W. corner of Section 5, TC.Ynship 7 South, Range 87 west of the 6th Principal Meridian bears S. 38°17'04" W. 1,808.99 feet; Cattle Creek N. 89°44'49" E., along the Northcrly Southee of fi-inc Cattlef Lots Ranch.P.U.D., Filing One, also'bein4 9 and 10, 34.12 feet to a point on the Easterly Right of Way Line of County Road 121, being the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said line, 676.94 feet; thence N. 00°15'11" W. 420.00 feat' to a point on the Easterly thence S. 99°44'49"W. 619.43 right of way line of County load 121 (Coulter Creek Road); thence Southerly along the 1!astcrly right of way line Of: said road the following courses and distances= �loncJ the arc of a curve to the left, with a radius of 1,291.00 1. • 05-03-02 02:28PM FROM—DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 4M1515 -M4 V.IU/1.6 h-114.4 • • •-• • .•• .• ".• ":1•. •- . • • • : C. • • ,• ce.,•• .• • . : • • • . • .;... r. • • •:1:.." • • :,••;•.: •,'•:••: • ••••••%. • .• J ••.• • ::•••:.•..• • .17,••*, • • • ..." ; ' :401' ••• . • ,..`.;;•, • • •"4 ra.••::., • 'f:f • • ;1..6 • .. • . • :••:•• • : • . •. • . - .••••!:.4"..7"242 : . •-• :000K ?7? FI3E640 - • •••:- . • • • ,.. ; , ..'...: i. • . .`....L.•4;0"7a•I-Telt--‘, "'417-::..---4.-1?, cl"A'e'-.s. . —.-- ......:'::•••...7,. ..21..q.•,,2•-, . .:: . .0....•.:*;:z . '• -•t.:•.. . • :.....; -; • .:,11. :. • : ..'2 •.:r :. :• ::.t .• .•i..:.••.f: .: •.'.: ::.:•... :..',. ..":•..•'....f.;t1`.i-',;rI;Ncf-.'.i.::.-,_-:'.:••,.:•.. :-• .. : .-•:' .:.;• 4.-:.:. .- :: " .:. • .• ..-:!.?:.:.:."-...1.•*-.:.,:.,".....;-....:i.. : .. .. . i..1l.,.-- '-.. • .S-t,czI.:.::";•!:•'''...$...4•':1 • .1-J4:i-i•:. • •TPP;I:•O.i -i,CeeC.: • i1%•tt-:at•1i3l-9.• C2e4L'Oc OWTP•.S 2.i31W ,0l4,'.O:31. .,*i4,2.:;.r.).-.-s.4—."••.1..3:-`T•1C1U -T1-O3av-.r7O .o.1-IP 1,FLs. 1z.1Tnf1a4..:,•..•i044?•s:r1a.Z•71.9.d.:.-.,.tU::.: ' .M2i4•14"i4l1•i-Pie 3-. .'/i:4 1/. !i1 i. -". . 4$l 7 n‘czr- ii , • talitr• . o• n• .d. c. w..•‘--:i''.ves-'.41s''•4t•. •. :g" 09 ..'_ : .., hay232300o- t1.-. :.t -:..e ...,:-• .e.'...,, • • •• -• ).••• .•• Cr: • A.'" • 1 4• :v • • • • ' •••• • . • COOK,OY 41,1311119. OUT& CosOIADO. ••t • O5-U3••UZ UZ:Ztll'M fRUM-UIVISION Of WATER RE5OURGE5 1 Grafkale of Copy of Record 3Udtlbb4C46 i—bon r.I I r-044 . S 's y_- STATE OF COLORADO, County of Garfield 1, Mildred Ais�Crf; County ce tify'that the-fo�regoing.is s Red 11141198 Bk #777-1,P Clerk and Recorder in and for said County, in the State aforesaid, do hereby a full, true and correct COPY of 41637. as the same appears upon the records of my office. 2 .`-_ ° !' :. `_ • -n • �• � "1.f-- .MILDRED " .- /- • -,,f1:. Given under mry band and official seal, tbis 30th day of . .= i April ysl? oclockP-M. �� ,A.D.193Q, .� s -.\ i ALSDORF r COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER I- - 05-03-02 02:27PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES ROY ROMER Governor 303866Z223 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street -Room 818 Denver, Coloraat) 80203 (303) 866-3581 TO: LOVELL & NANCY GRUMLEY RECEIPT NO.: 306109 Your application for a permit to construct a well is being returned for the reasons listed below. The lcan proceedand/or furtheradditional the evaluationiof requested is required before we your application. All corrections you make to the application must be typed or printedin EALK INK. Plose initial a1►d date all c a • sada.•' •,s ak- to tae ap ication fm_ Return the original application form with all attached documentation to ******#******************************_***k*************************** this office. T-558 P.0T/23 F-634 JERIS A. DANIELSON State Engineer FROM: GLENN GRAHAM DATE: 20 OCTOBER 1989 We require information pertaining to the creation of the 6 acre parcel an which you have proposed the construction of a well. Please see the enclosed memorandum for a description of the kinds of information we require. Make sure to in'ti�l and ate correctiondf®r addittgn5 Yolake to the aDalicatiort forin. Feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or require additional information. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 05-03-02 .02:29PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES ROY ROMER 'Governor 3038662223 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street -Room 878 Denver. Colorado 80203 (309) 8681-3581 MEMORANDUM T-558 P.15/23 F-634 JERIS A. OANIELSON Stele Engineer TO: LOVELL & NANCY GRUMLEY FROM: GLENN GRAHAM RECEIPT NO.: 306109 DATE: 20 OCTOBER 1989 The subject application for a permit to construct a well is being returned for additional information concerning the parcel of land on which the proposed well would be located. In order to properly evaluate the application, -this office must have evidence indicating when the subdivision, or this particular parcel of land was created. Please provide one of the following: 1) If the subdivision or aarticuler parcel was in existence prior t June 1, 1972, please provide a copy of a deed, subdivision plat, or other document to verify that fact. Your county clerk and recorder's office should be able to help you create a chain of title for your parcel, leading to a title transfer that occurred before June 1, 1972. A copy of such a transfer would be the the evidence we require. 2) If the division of land which created your particular parcel occurred on or after June 1, 1972 and was exempted from the county subdivision regulations, please provide all of the following: a) A copy of the county commissioners resolution. --- b) A copy of a survey plat showing the original tract and all exempted tracts. c) A copy of any comment from the State Engineer's Office pertaining to the proposed water supply plan. d) Information concerning the existence of any wells and their uses on the original tract and the exempted tracts. e) Copies of the documents showing when the original tract was created (this is required only if the original tract was less than 35 acres in size, or if it was involved in a previous exemption. f) Copies of any other agreements concerning this tract that were executed with the county. 3) If the subdivision or particular parcel was created after June 1, 1972 by action other than a resolution of the county commissioners, please provide copies of documents to show how it was created. If other corrections or additional information is required for evaluation of the application, an additional memorandum may be enclosed. Please review the enclosures carefully before returning the application. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office. 05-03-02 0Z:Z9PM FROM -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES �u�eebz«� I—bbd V. lb/LO 1—b64 .EXNIBtT eEc-4J- 306/07 RECEIVED OCT 1 6 '89 WATEA RESOURCES STATE Et4NEER COLO. A Tract of land situate in Section 5, being a part of Lots 9 and 10, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the S.W. corner of Section 5, Township 7 South. Range 87 West of the 6th Principal Meridian bears S. 38°17'04- W. 1,808.99 feet; thence N. 89°44'49" E.. along the Northerly line of Cattle Creek Ranch P.U.D., Filing One, also being the Southerly line of Lots 9 and 10, 680.00 feet; thence N. 00°15'11" W. 420.00 feet; thence S. 89°44'49• W. 605.36 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of County Road 121 (Coulter Creek Road) thence Southerly along the Easterly right of way line of said road the following courses and distances: S. 00°00'08" E. 43.58 feet; S. 02°05'30• E. 158.36 feet and S. 19°46'40" W. 232.19 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 6.00 acres more or less, all in the County of Garfield. State of Colorado u4:corm riwim—vivwUN Ut WAItK KtJUUKLC3 ROY ROMER Governor 41.14[1004444 1—=1 r.14/44 t—b611 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES • . 1313 Sternan Street -Room 818 Denver. Colorado 80203 (303) 886-3581 January 11, 1990 Mr. Glenn Hartmann Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Grumley Exemption Sec. 5, T7S, R87W JERI S A. DANIELSON State Engineer Dear Mr. Hartmann: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to separate 6 acres from a 252 acre tract. The proposed 6 acres would be used as a residential tract and the applicant is seeking a well. We could make a household -use -only well available for the 6 -acre tract. Use of this well for lawn and garden would be prohibited. If these limitations are acceptable to the applicant, we can recommend approval. We ask for a plat note or covenant to reflect the limitation on the use of the well. We consider this to be a one-time exemption and thus would be opposed to any future separations of the 246 -acre tract of less than 35 acres. JRH/JCM/clf:74731 cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer Bruce DeBrine Sincerely, James R. Hall, P.E. Supervising Water Resources Engineer Attachment 7 Documentation for On-Site Wells Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO PAGE 24 Corm rvo. ?• •-- GWS -25 ?Chi �, ts��s�,n ON Denver,OA�dEaRoRESU .. 1'�1i..1 1• uu LIC APPLICANT DEC 262001 SNQWMASS LAND COMPANY C/O PATRICK, MILLER & KROPP PC 730 E DURANT, SUITE 200 ASPEN, CO 81811- (970) 920-1028 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shell be used in such a way es to cause no materiel injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to •another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a Civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors In accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuent to CRS 37-92.8402(3)(b)(1) for uses as described in CRS 37.92-602(1)(f). Use of this well is limited to monitoring water levels anchor water quality sampling. This well Is known as LAURENCE WELL 01. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cep or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked at WI times except during sampling or measuring. 6) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the wail owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 6) Upon conelusion of the monitoring program the well owner shalt plug this Weil in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be computed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 7) The owner shall mark the well In a conspicuous place with well permit number(s) and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall lake necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a licensed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Constrictton.Rules. If non-standard construction Is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted in accordance with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. S) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including lithologIc log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction, the report must include en as -built drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, ar.d a description of the grouting type end interval. 10) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit.. i;'z LL PERMIT NUMBER 38t9� DIV. 5 WO 38 DES. BASIN MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 1 Township 7 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM -SECTION UNES 2000 Ft. from South Section Line 450 Ft. from Est Section Line UTM COORDINATES Northing: Easting; _ • Alf . DATE ISSUED ! `� EXPIRATION DATE DFC 2 0 2 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 238003 Owner Name(s): Snowmasa Co. Old tie /, tot 2 Mailing Address: °lo Zancanella at Assoc. P.O. Box 1908 City, State, Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Films 4 : 970-945.5700 aprRovnLGwsrl•91-0� WELL LOCATTt7:�I A� NE 101 SE 1/4 Sea 1 Twp: 7 9 amp. 83 DISTANCES FROM SEC. w 1 n* anft. from Sec. line OR Northing 2371472 gam; 31 6 R from Sc.e. lice d LOT: BLOCK: FILM (UN/1): PAGE 20 TOR OTfits UM 014t.Y 31. VZ3I0N: 5TREPI ADD SS S AS LOCATION DRIIS.INCi is/IMOD Air Rotary C}RotnvD SLTRFACIz F�YAnON It. DEPTH COMPLETION: 320 DATE COMPLETED: 4/10/2002 TOTAL DEPTH. 320 GEOLOGIC I.Act TNT; of Mntarril Size Color And T 000-218 2111-250 230-320 Volcanic; 3. d ravela e Vali Et FRobt tlp 9.0 6.5 Farmnnon Inc 7. PLAIN CA51Na OI? t1R1 °411$:* F�►d ° t' Meal 0.240 -1 Mi 5.5 PV 40 230 5,5 PVC 0.250 2S0 320 0 To a4 44 320 . Y1 ? F, CASLN'G : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.230 230 280 Water Located: 230.290 Reattarics 8. Fills:Pack Material : 9ise : Interval ; 9. Packer Placement Tyra : Depth : 10. OROLr NCi AECOIM MiteMitarki Mroutst Com% DemntT ;rYaw vu Placement 563 f ga Isb 1040 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : EiTH 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Bax If Test grata Ts Subsnittad On Supplemental TE.TINC3 } MOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 225 Pumping Level : Total S. Dote/Time Measured 4/10/1002 Test Remarks : 13. foL� r- Gwp me , aawls aen.k.► ad Mn* l k w..t. t zAed d ,y w Mfio ro iL 41.1.41. ".." re +wdow is a.rr (L1�lee CM, i. MOM, a 6616 66611660.66COi TOR Shaiton riilig Corp. Thom : (970) 927 -4182 2 Miling Address P.O- Hon 1059 3salt, Co. 81621 Lic. No. 095 Date Dl;rta/Time Mound 4/10/2002 Amt. Used : 5 oz. Production Rate 8 Sinn rest Lath : 2 hours ?Tomei Title (Please Type cr Print) Siw"ure Wayne Shelton 1 President 4/17(2002 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO PAGE 07 TABLE 1 Pump Test Data Well ID: Laurence Ranch Well #1 - Lot 2 Job No.: 21839 Client: Snowmass Land Co. Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Top of Casing Q ■ 7 9Pm r a ft S.W,L. = 226,0 ft ft b■ Time/Date on: 4/16/02 10:30 AM Time/Date off: 4/17/02 5:30 PM Test Length: 31:00:00 total time TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement Drawdown (fast) Q (gpm) 7 t' (minutes) tir (feat) (inches) 4/16/02 10:30 AM 0 228 . 0 SWL 4/18102 6:00 PM 300 235 0 9.00 7 4/17/02 8:00 AM 1290 237 2 11.17 7 4/17/02 5:30 PM 1660 - 237 6 11.60 7 7/02 55:35 PM • r 1865 232 6 6.50 Stop Pumping 0 5 10 373 187 4/17/02 5:40 PM 1870 231 0 5.00 4/17/02 5:46 PM 1875 229 8 3,67 0 15 125 4/17/02 6:00 PM 1890 220 2 2.37 0 30 63 7/23!2002 anoeneila & Asaoctetes, Inc. Lot 2 Pump Test ftebetl 416-02 end 4-22-02.x15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 09/1012002 13:00 9709234023 Well ID: SNOWMASS LAND CO PAGE 08 TABLE 2 Pump Test Data Laurence Ranch Well #1 - Lot 2 Job No.: 21539 Client: Snowma a Land Co. Test By: Saa uelson Analysis By: I -CP M.P. = Top of Casing Q ■ 7 Siem rft S.W.L. = 228.2 ft b■ ft TimelDate on: 4/22102 9:40 AM Time/Date off: 4122/02 11:10 AM Test Length: 1:30:00 total time TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement _ Drawdown Meat) Q (spm) r (minutes) tit' (feat) (inches) 4/22/02 9:40 AM 0 228 2 WL 7 4/22/02 9:41 AM __ 1 228 0 2.00 7 4/22/02 9:42 AM 2 230 0 3.83 7 4/22/02 9:43 AM 3 230 6 4.33 7 4/22/02 9:44 AM 4 230 a 4.50 7 4/22/02 9:45 AM 5 231 0 4.83 7 4/22102 9:46 AM 6 231 4 9.17 7 4/22/02 9:48 AM 8 232 0 5.83 7 .4/22102 9:50 AM _ _ 10 232 7 8.42 7 4/22/02 9:52 AM 12 232 10 6.67 7 4/22/02 9:55 AM 16 233 5 7.25 7 4/22/02 10:00 AM 20 233 10 7.67 7 4/22/02 10:10 AM 30 234 8 8.50 7 4/22/02 10:20 AM 40 236 B 9.50 7 4/22/02 10:30 AM 50 238 1 9.92 7 4/22/02 10:40 AM — 60 236 B 10.33 7 4/22/02 11:10 AM 90 237 1 10.92 7 Stop Pumping 763/2002 Zenoenelle & Aeaooiates, Inc. Lot 2 Pump Teat ReDrill 4-16-02 end 4-22-02.xJe 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOkMASS LAND CO PAGE 09 G c r • ,.. 1 1 a- 1 1 1 1 r 1 11"488§ r r r ... (4) IOAG1 J3WM 4 4 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO PAGE 10 - - - 1 . _ 1 1 • : - - - t i i i 1 i • i • is i - E ? 1 - i • - i - i • • • •. - 1 •1 1 . . 1 7.-------.T. _ y_ - - - •- , • ' - ' ' ! 1 4 t i. 0 in 0 (IDA61'!W S WO.id leeA) UMopmeia 09/10/2902 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Monitoring & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR ORIGINAL. PHASE 11, V INORGANIC ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES [ ] or NO [ X1 THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS '^"",NSTRUC77ONS/DEFINITIONS ON BACK OF FORM**" PWSID #: NIA COUNTY: Garfie d DATE COLLECTED _ 4 r' 16 / SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Snovcas Land Co. SYSTEM ADDRESS: clo Zarcanefla & Assts., 1005 Cooper A_ve. City nwood Spr1nState O 818Z1p Street addraas/P,O. Box CONTACT PERSON: - Brad Pe k PHONE: c 970 ) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad P ek ___, TIME COLLECTED: 10:45 amlprrr WATER TYPE: [ X ] RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) or CHLORINATED [ J or OTHER TREATMENT [ PAGE 28 SOURCE(S): Laurence ' anch Well 1 LOCATION(S): - Address - 11 (SEE BACK OF FORM) DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [ ] NO [ X For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE # 6 C oS "tit CLIENT NAME or ID # �� �a� L"' so LABORATORY NAME C -A6 awa'tar Baa , LAB PHONE #111.0) S-10 •�.,�'S \ a , DATE ANALYZED °� - "14- .`°`-`" SAMPLE POINT(S): Well He =d DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 1 Irl / COMMENTS (mgiL) (mg/LI) mm.mrls RESULT MCI ANTIMONY 0.006 ARSENIC m, ao - 0.05 BARIUM 0 ...ma 2.0 BERYLLIUM 0.004 CADMIUM 0.005 CHROMIUM 133j,„, 0.1 n'�' O' t COPPER a , orrt 1.3` M•1..0o. $ EPA (mg/L1) METHOD LAB MDL _•, �i..d P • b }414.6 h•e CYANIDE 0.2 FLUORIDE +0_ 4.0 LEAD '— IS1aL. 0.015' MERCURY R DI— 0.002 NICKEL 0.1 SELENIUM 3)t- 0.05 SOLIUM 'r_,, .. SULFATE 1.0 500.0" THALLIUM _ 0.002 M too . 5 •t.41. t Masa? .. '7 0.00 .moi o .' L c> PO o.ecdC ,,7002— b cs 0•S %0 Lc.1 �i•33 0I, Z3 •02.• 4-}'7-1•01-• 01_ zs •6z - BDL = Indicates that the compound was anaiyzad for, but was below the Lab MOL. s NOT an MCL, "Action Level" NT * Not tested for Compound mg'L= Milligrams per Liter r*: NOT an MCL."Monitoring Requirement Only" MCL z Maximum Contaminant Level H = Holding time has been exceeded Lab MDL = Labor ory Method Detection Limit `._%}� 4 eviewed & Approvby\ Til Date Mail Results to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-CMDM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Monitoring & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATENTRITEle NITROGEN ANALYSES SAMPLER PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES (] or NO [ X ] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS *""' INSTRUCTIONS/DEFINITIONS ON BACK OF FORM"""' PWSID #J2JA COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED 4/ 15102 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME. SnQwmass Land SYSTEM ADDRESS: n analis Assts. 1 t)3 Cco r Av nu City lenwos� State CO 81 Z 1 Street address/P.D. Box p CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: ( 970 ) 945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 10:45 ern/in PAGE 29 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek WATER TYPE: ( X] RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) or CHLORINATED ( ) or OTHER TREATMENT [ J SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): - Address SAMPLE POINT(S): LaLrence Ranch Well #1 i CR 103 (SEE BACK OF FORM) DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES ( j NO (X 1 For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE # '"" 1_ CLIENT NAME or ID # LABORATORY NAME ArG , L -U-\ ®v ev-�es LAB PHONE # fR2o 1 1Z� • ' DATE {DECEIVED IN LABORATORY / t"l / 01-- DATE ANALYZED L ' 0 / 1 - COMMENTS (mg/L) (mg/1J) EPA (mg/LI) 2..A_RagaR RESULT MC1 METHOD LA NITRATEINITRITE-N k -0 ld 10.0 µ...1.1.3.::_2.. " `" et - NITRATE -N j •c) 5 10.0 c. -k ^- ° . 0 2 NITRITE -N ___.1_ 1.0 3<1.;:_•:.-_ ........L.., BDL te indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but wen below the Lab MDG. NT = Not Testes for compound. mg/L = Milligrams per Liter MCL It MaXimum Contaminant Level Lab MCL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H 2 Holding Time has been exceeded Reviewed & Approved MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of PLOW Health and Environment, WOCD-CMDM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CC 90246-1530 Date 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNONMASS LAND CO PAGE 30 Colorado Department PRNG FORM FORublic th and Environment - COR OS_,�, Y ANALYSES Section RSAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES (] or NO IX] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS *" 1NSTRUCTIONS/DEFINITIONS ON SACK OF FORM*" PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: _ Qarfiekl DATE COLLECTED 411Q/02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME:_ pwmaas Land Co. SYSTEM ADDRESS: c/a_Zarlganeile & Assts., 1005Cao r AvenueGlenwoo Cahill State 81 p Street address/PO Box PHONE:() 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY __fired Peok TIME COLLECTED:10:45 am/ prrt WATER TYPE: RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) [X] or CHLORINATE [ ] or OTHER TREATMENT ( ] SOURCES(S): LOCATION(S): -Address SAMPLE POINT(S): Laurence Ranch WeII #1 / Cid 103 _/ Well Head (SEE BACK OF FORM) CORROSIVITY SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory use Only Below This Late LABORATORY SAMPLE f# t. 3LWCB, —D t CLIENT NAME or ID# C+lfa.S.r, • LABORATORY NAME &G- L4fe,KN+bH` LAB PHONE # (M�' 9i Sick • O DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY k / Vt / 'L- DATE ANALYZED - —_ COMMENTS_ CONTACT PERSON; Brad it P ARAM ETR (rng/I) (mg11) EPA (mgll) RESULT MCL METHOD LAS MOL —• LANGLIER INDEX 4.�. �f 3a . 67� �t.w CALCIUM CARBONATE ST` NIA 5 ''1 'z3 $ Id , L DISSOLVED SOLIDS ___ N/A ] 9 . t t pH -I, ,'4r N/A M.3ao•_1 LP —.. 14.=z. • b 7.— TOTAL ALKALINITY VI N/A s Ht 2:32;915 2._ �•3a • Z.. TEMPERATURE NT = Not Tested for compound NIA = Not applicable mg/l, = Milligrams per liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H = Holding Time has been exceeded "* IF LANGLIER INDEX 18 A NEGATIVE NUMBER, WATER IS CORROSIVE. IF LANGLIER INDEX IS ZERO, WATER IS BALANCED. IF LANGLIER 1 'EX IS A POSITIVE NUMER, WATER 18 SCALE FORMING. Rev o d & Approved Title • Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. WQCD-DW-82, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80222-1530 09/10/200213:00 9769234023 5N0WMASS LAND CO r. • LA®OnATORY 8 RADIATION SERVICES US MAIL 100 LOWRY BOuL@VAAD rO SOX 1712 DENVER .'C etzufraus DGNVGR, CO DO217 WATER BACTERIOLOGY SAM IPt II RMATION: CONMtNNTY NON -COMMUNITY PFUVATE PW81D1 ! l l k RPUCUTiNEIAL ❑fIN6MB01141 RAw ::1 RfiPfiiATFOR THE MDf1TWOP Apu -Iff-two ^ C / qy�� Mi�1. coutm AWF� a' I n 2 r'I Dig or./5CHLORNE ADDRESe ORDERED RY: (SAMPt.G MAY NOT 8E TESTED F(OINFORMATION) Q� PHONE PLG STAMP LAS 10B cowry • 002932 APR1702 09:35 d B. ild 7) RATE Twekted A4„:45 Ir CDLLat8D AECENED ` ❑ fM - TEST orcepan op wet 0 OTHER ._ RESULTS: SEE ROME FOR TCAM.COUWORN d IREEENT MOST P!'C AZLE NQ COLIFORNY100ML • ❑ DENVER u DC1'� J' C ACT ANALYST •l 09/1012002 13:00 9709234023 SNOIMIASS LAND CO 1= No, OFFICE OF O DMS ON a WATER RESOURCES NGINEER 1 -GWS -25 COLORADO 9i 1a'13 Sherman 5t. Denver, Calorado 80203 (303) 866-35a1 Pp T R � WELL PERMIT NUMBER _---_ DIV. 5 WD 35 DES. BAS1N MO SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY % PATRICK MILLER & KROPF PC 730 E DURANT STE 200 ASPEN, CO 81611- (970) 920-1028 PERMIT TO. CONSTRUCT:A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF,APPRO](BLL,• rmit 1) This well assure these ca that way Injurry will ccur oto cause no da anoerial tnjury to existing her vested watery right or preclude another ownerf ar lights. The ieSuance Of this vested does not as PP water right from seeidng relief in a civil court action. 2-2, unless rove! compliance with the Water ll ction Rules 2 CCR of a variance 2) construction been grarr ted by then State Board of Examiners of Water oWell C nstructlon and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37.92-802(3)(b)(1) for uses as described in CRS 37-92-802(1)(f), Use of this wall is limited to monitoring water !ovals and/or water quality sampling. This well is known as LAURENCE WELL f$ 5. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open wet!. The wail must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measuring. 5) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request 8) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 18 of the Water Well Construction Rules. A Weil Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division cf Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 7) The owner snail mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s) and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shell take necessary means and precautions to preserve these merkinge. 8) This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a Ilcersed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. If non-standard construction Is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted In accordance with Rule.18 and approved prior to well construction. 9) A Weil Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), Including lithologic lag must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well, For non-standard construction, the report must include an as -built drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type aro intervai. 10) This wed shell be constructed not mare than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 11) Pursuant to Rule 6.2.3 of the Water Well Construction Rules, the well construction contractor shall submit the as -built well location on work reports required by Rule 17.3 within 60 days of completion of the well. The measured location must be accurate to 200 feet of the actual location. The location information must include either the 1/4, 1/4, Section, Township. Range, and distances from section lines, or a GPS location pursuant to the DIvision of Water Resources' guideiirses. 9V - PAGE 27 LIC APP VED W ELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 7 Township 7 S Range.87 W Sixth P.M, DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft, from Section Line Ft. from Section Line UTM,OORQiyATgs Northing: Easting: State Engineer - t No flA d92B "DATE ISSU D bEll T10N DATE APR 1 8 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO WELL coxsTRUcTYa���OF TEST ���l T STATE OF COLORS I)O, p 1, WELL PERMIT NUMBER 240236 Owner Is1=0(0: Snowmast Co. Mailing Address:' Zeno=llti & Assoc. P,O. Box 1908 City, Stam, Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Phone # : 970-945-3700 Zi 3, N8 1/4 DISTANCES FROM SBC. LINES R. from Sea line and 31:131211VISION: Fat 0TTxz U.',!1 ONLY A)6r1 $, "t 2'19 . 2PROvAL aY atv33141 PAGE 23 NE 1/4 Sec 7 Twp: 7 3 Rte: $7 W Sac, line OR Northing: 4370775 Ewing: 315459 BLOCK: MING (UM): t. from LOT: ADDRESS AT LOCATION DRILLINGNfBTHOD Air IZoRstY GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION !k DATE co L.. : 4/25/2002 TOTAL DEPTH 185 DPI COMPLETION: 185 BOLO LOG ��e ith 6. I40LE r SAZ 'C ?. tin) Tyne of Material (Size. Calor 1md Type) 49 6.5 000-081 Volcanic Cl }E1.155 hard Vo1cla 155-185 Red Cindant 7; 10144 CASING KIN FROM db 0 42 VIP ro et) 42 185 :NA r m To 7.0 5.5 Steel PVC u.'240 0.250 _l 35 42 1 b PERF, CASING 5.5 Screen S1ot Size pvc 0.250 155 180 Water Located: 155+ Reaxttia 8. Filter Pecs: Materiel, Size Interval 9. Packer Pltumment Type Depth : 14. C3ROL''TIIve RECORD AMP* Dainty Cc 't 5 skit d gol/ti: Plocema t 10-40 POtlKad 11. DISINFECTION : Type : EiII-1 ""17.. WELL TEST DATA () (heck Box If Test Data 1s Submittal On Supplement* TESTING 2y113113011) : Air Compressor Static Level : 131 tt. Putopir41 Level: Total t3. Tat RemQd&r DOWTilne Measured 41225/2002 DatsrTimi Measured 4/25/2002 13' vO. Mb+1ef aWY�0 Ww• ld hAMIM anM8.114.4 YMIA fW�'-MC1' 1 6W b drf CONTRACTOR : Skelton Carp. Mailing Adl lrerx : P.C. Box 1059 Easel; Co. 81621 Arm. Used : 2 oz. Production Rate 20 gam Test Lerch : 2 hours Name / Title (Flame Type or Print) Wayne Shelton r President Signature Phone : (970) 927-4182 Lic. No, 1095 Date 5/21/2002 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO PAGE 17 TABLE 8 Pump Test Data Well ID: Laurence Ranch - Well #5, Lot 20 Job No.: 21839 Client: Snowmsee Land Co. Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: RAZ M.P. = Top of Casing Q s 15 gpm ra ft S.W.L - 127.3 tt b= ft Time/Date on: 4/29/02 3:45 PM Tima&D8t8 of: 4/30102 4:40 PM Test Length: 24:55:00 total time 7/23/2002 Z9ncanella & Assoc Wes, Inc. Lot 20 Pump Tast 4.29-02.x1: W W.L. Measurement Drawdown (feet) SWL Q 1gpm1 15 t' (minutes) tit' TIME Time (minutes) (feet) 127 (inches) 4 4129102 3:45 PM 0 ---T-1/29/5317-48 PM 1 128 7 1.00 15 4/29/02 3:47 PM 2 130 9 3.42 5.00 7.17 15 15 15 4129/02 3:48 PM 4129102 3:49 PM 3 4 132 134 4 6 4/29/02 3:50 PM 5 6 136 139 141 2 4 0 8.83 15 11.00 13.87 15 - 4/29/02 3:51 PM 15 4/29/02 3:53 PM 8 4/2(4/02 3:55 PM 10 143 6 16.17 15 4/29/02 3:57 PM 12 143 8 18.33 15 4/29/02 4:00 PM 15 143 10 16.50 15 4/29/02 4:05 PM 20 144 0 18.87 15 4/29/02 4:16 PM 30 144 4 17.00 15 4/29/02 4:25 PM "---40 144 5 17.08 15 4/29/02 4:35 PM 50 144 6 ^ 17.17 15 15 4/29/02 4:45 PM 80 144 7 17.25 4/29/02 5:15 PM 90 144 10 17,50 15 4/30/0210:30 AM 1125 145 8 18.33 15 4/30/02 4:40 PM 1495 143 11 18.58 15 16 5 P 1 TjijujE,1Fi1[fI1stoPPum;9.Fi 1 b01 1420StopPumping47 748 549 350 251 351 PM1502138T 2 PM150313383 PM15041312 PM1505128 PM 1506 128 1005 4 3.83 1.00 4 6 4130/02 4:53 PM 1508 125 3 0.92 8 189 4/30/02'4;55 PM 1510 128 2 0.83 10 151 4/30102 4:57 PM 1512 128 1 0.75 12 128 4/30/02 5:00 PM 1515 128 0 0.87 15 101 4/30/02 5:05 PM 1520 128 0 0.87 20 78 _ 4/30/02 5:18 PM 1330 128 0 0.67 30 61 7/23/2002 Z9ncanella & Assoc Wes, Inc. Lot 20 Pump Tast 4.29-02.x1: 09/1012002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO d 4 t re S PAGE 18 t 1. 1 1 a (i)1eAa1 mem 1 1 1. 1 53 4 J 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOWMASS LAND CO PAGE 19 441.1.111111 mummir 0 C2 M Q N (IOA01 ope;g wo,,dwed) uMOpMJc Q 1 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 SNOINASS LAND CO Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Monitoring & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATE/N E as NITROGEN ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES [ 1 or NO ( j THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS mg' /NSTRUC7'1ONS/DEI Nl7YONS ON SACK OP FORM'' PWSID #: N/A _ COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED 4 /30 /02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME Lauren Ranch PAGE 32 SYSTEM ADDRESS: glgigecanalle & Assts. 1.15 Coor Ave Street aodress/P.O. Box CONTACT PERSON: Torn Zapcanelle. SAMPLE COLLECTED BY:Torn Len ar&Ia cI-1.... •rin City CO 81.01 State Zlp PHONE:97 945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 1:05 om WATER TYPE: [ x1 RAW (No chtorine or other treatment) or CHLORINATED [ j or OTHER TREATMENT [ SOURCE(S): t.oCAT1ON(S): - Address SAMPLE POINT(S): Laurence Rancn We(L#e 1 Lot 20, Laurence Ranch (SEE SACK OF FORM) DO SAMPLES NEED TO SE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [ 1 NO [ x ] For Laboratory Use Only Below This tine LABORATORY SAMPLE # Vt.5 — o t CLIENT NAME or ID # g c` -4 -"'Ccs LAB PHONE # fano) 91°1 - tad"O! 5- } LABORATORY NAME 4r C. DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 'y / i 1 co DATE ANALYZEDS 11 2. ! c Z.. COMMENTS (mg/L) (mg/L1) PARANjgtER RESULT MCI NI aRATEINITRITE-N 111....A.-4-- 1c.o NITRATE -N .1=2"1.— 10.0 NITRITE -N 1.0 EPA (mg/LI) METHOD LAB MDL ea4 c4,0..tk. /d\ ea 2- 0.0k BOL = indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDG. NT = Not Tested for Impound. mg/L = Milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H 7 Holding Time has been exceeded qC© 14\0,4\w: Tide Date Reviewed & Approve MAIL RESULTS TO; Colorado Deoartmantof Public Health and Er vironmefL WQCD-CMOM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive Sautn. Denver, GO 8024a-1530 3 (;;— ( 09/10/2002 13:00 9709234023 _ _ SNOWMASS LAND CO t QIQraoN yaaNa�.+.�.••• ••• - Compliance Monitoring & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR .: AL, PHASE 1L V INORGANa ANALYSES SAMPLER: ES[]PLEASE FILLOUT ONE UO� • FOR TO BE USED1VIOUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET TO FULFILL STATESAMPLING REQUIREMENTS YES [ ] or NO [ x THESE]E "" INSTRUCTIONS/DEFINITIONS ON BACK OF FORM`' COUNTY: _Garfield DATE COLLECTED 4 / 30 102 PAGE 33 PWSID #: N/A SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Laurens Ranch Well #2 SYSTEM ADDRESS: c o Zencanell = & Assts 1005 - - City State Zip Street address/F.O. 8TIM .0. Box PHONECCI.f=L: !_(970194 CTED: 5-67001;05pm CONTACT PERSON: T e SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Tom ZaaoaneIla WATER TYPE: [ x 1 RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) or CHLORINATED [ ] or OTHER TREATMENT [ SAMPLE POINT(S): - 1. • od S. in•s • 81601 SOURCE(S): Laurence Rano Well LOCATrON(S): - Address ce Rance r Well Head -I (SEE SACK OF FORM) NO [ x ] DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [ 1 For Laboratory Use Only aelcaw This Line�� CLIENT NAME or ID # i� o•+••yaw �c.. A P -s *Ne`' ..s,- -S LAS PHONE #mol S7 R ' c• -`17-4)05 °0b DATE ANALYZED ''° t•a •oc..- LABORATORY SAMPLE ft 1.- -441•4 S -0 k LABORATORY NAME Imo- k•-•°•••g'41"-c-%-dr--5 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY S. / t / o COMMENTS L PARAMETER RrrESI.)LT ANTIMONY $ 0.006 ARSENIC o . o,L.s 0.05 BARIUM .o t 2.0 'BERYLLIUM . 0.004 CADMIUM '45'0+.- 0.005 CHROMIUM= 0.1 COPPER o .000c. 1.3' CYANIDE ------------t .2 FLUORIDE 6 .3.-__ 4.0 4.015' MERCURY V 0.002 NICir. 0.1 SELENIUM G 8 . 1.^ 0.05 SODIUM -.:.1:1. SULFATE t ,.v 500.0" THALLIUM o , 0.002 (rngiU) EPA METHOD Jud Zvi �Ni 2 dy 1.011,•7 A. __ 4 (mg/LI) LAB M44 S .,b .Q1 S t -T , o -z... 5.,o •p7r s•,,z. c•\1.01... SOL : Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MCL._ NOT an MCL. "Action Level" NT = NotM Milligrams for perLiter -• =NOT an MCL,"Mor!tanng Requirement Only" MCL : Milligrams; Liter H Holding time has been exceeded MCL � Maximum Contaminant Level Lab MOL = Labor • tory Method Detection Limit Reviewed & Approv -• y Mail Reauits to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCO-CM0M-82, 4300 Cherry Creels Drive South. Denver, CO 80248-1530 09/13/2002 13:00 9709234023 4.. • USORATORv 8 RADIATION sERVIC!S 8109 LOGY' DOLLEVARD 'DENVER, OD 40230402a 9404IASS LAND CO US MAIL PO SOX 17129 DENVER, CO 10217 WATER BACTERIOLOGY SpMPI.� IxgpgpBATIGN: COMMUNITY Q NONCOMMUNITY RNATE ❑ ROUTiN6 Jig RAW El POWS FOP TM! MDNPI Of PWS ID �— .SPECIAL PURP08E 0 FiNL9HED OF STsT�+ cOl1NTY ' t F- •,.'.1.4axWaM�'N+ -`aM^'/aAMYt.. 0030410 MAY 01' 0212105 �DAATTE TIME BY -=+lIk=L00LLE0TED—i� 121 max receiveo 144 :I AM i 144w ^7o paLowne L NAM! accoeDs GRDkRED BY (SANW E MAY NOT 5E TESD 1F ALL NFORmAllON 1, 70'1 MORE) �L Iti""" NAME ThooFtat ils3aey� ,',€ L/ d'/ebo/ FiE STAMP LAB 1o/ 107t97) Rti3SULTS: 6EE REVD! PGA EX?I,AHATION TOTAL0OIJFOPM tildPRESENT ❑ ASSENT MOST PML! N0' AMriOGNL /8.. /ZIP TEST ORDERED U3'9TD BAOT. ❑ OTii A(6 1(.46ct- r Ire Cl DENVER 7 A 0 �r i► ANALtf iT jalCIFIDACT. Attachment 8 Augmentation Plan Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September2002 UG -15-2002 THU 04:03 PM PMK pc DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 5, COLORADO Garfield County Courthouse 109 8th Street, Suite 104 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970/945-5075 IN THE APPLICATION OF WATER RIGHTS FOR SLC-LAURENCE, LLC in Garfield County Attorneys: Scott C. Miller, #26181 Patrick, Miller & Kropf, P.C. 730 E. Durant, Suite 200 Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-1028 - Telephone 970/925-6847 - Facsimile miller@waterlaw.com • FAM NO. 9709256847 • COURT USE ONLY a Case Number: 02CW108 P, 02/15 AMENDED APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUNDRIGHTS AND APPROVAL OF PLAN 1F'ORNEW TER RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATERAUGMENTATION COMES NOW, the Applicant, SLC -Laurence, LLC, by and through its counsel, Patrick, Miller & Kropf, P.C., and respectfully requests the Court grant this amended application for underground water rights, new water rights and change of water rights and approve this amended application for plan for augmentation and, as grounds therefore, states: 1. Name, address and telephone number of Applicant: SLC -Laurence, LLC c/o Patrick, Miller & Kropf, P.C. 730 E. Durant St., Suite 200 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-1028 AUG -15-2002 THU 04:04 PM PMK pc FAK Na 9709255847 District Court, Water Division 5 Page 2 Case No. 02CW 10S Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation DIST CLAIM I T ON FOR CONDIT 1 N DERGROUND WAT R GHTS Laurence Ranch Well No. 1; Laurence Ranch Well No. 2; Laurence Ranch Well No. 3; Laurence Ranch Well No. 4; Laurence Ranch Well No. 5. Additional wells may be identified and added during the course of this proceeding, if needed, so long as the total annual diversions for all wells do not exceed the claimed amount below. 3. Legal Description of Well Field (all in Garfield County): The Laurence Ranch Well Nos. 1-5 will be located in a well field on athe s follows, anacre �showne ch graphproperty, ca 1y on the ch property boundaries are legally attached Exhibit "A": Lot 5 of Section 1, in Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6`r P.M., W t/2 SE 1/4 E W 1/4 and Lots 5, 7 and S of Secti•15t of the 6 P tMN hereinafterE tferred to1/4 NW ws l inSection 7,Township 7 South, Range 87Wt "Laurence Ranch Property"). 4. Source for all wells: Groundwater tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork River. 5. Amount claimed for each well: 0.40 c.f.s. (180 g.p.m.), conditional. The cumulative annual diversions from all wells will be 47.1 acre feet 6. Proposed uses for each well: Domestic, fire protection, irrigation, stockwatering. A. Date of Appropriation for each well: January 15, 2002 B. Date Water applied to Beneficial Use for each well: n/a C, How appropriation was initiated for each well: Formulation of intent on the apply water to beneficial use, field inspection, survey, test hole drilling program Laurence Ranch Property. 7. Legal description and acreage of land to be irrigated: 2. Narne of Well Structures: P. 03/15 WAS L C`8a M3Tleadingewmended Application for Wits Plan for Aug 7-31dl2.doc AUG -15-2002 THU 04:04 FM FMK ee FAX NO, 9709256847 P. 04/15 District Court, Water Division 7 Page 3 Case No. 02CW 108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of plan for Augmentation The Wells will provide lawn, garden and landscape irrigation for up to 11.93 acres (approximately 20;000 square feet per lot) contained within the Laurence Ranch Property described above„ 8. The Warne of the present owner of the land upf on ��� of nth�eol ntdeupon which located the is: Applicant; the names and address underground water will be used are: Applicant. SON/ELAS APPLICAJION FOR NEW, ADDITIONAL US'OR PREVIOUSLLIECUED SIGE AND SURFA '' HTS 9. Name of structures and water rights previously decreed: Laurence Pond No. 1; Laurence Pond No. 2; Laurence eP eed n Calc No. 95CW94, Water DiLaurence Pond No. 4; vision enceDot 5.' First Enlargement, all as 10. Legal Description of Points of Diversion (in Garfield County): A. Laurence Pond No. 1 Point of Diversion: The center of Laurence renc2050 feet Pond frNo. 1 is m east located at a point 1800 feet from the south section ane187 W est of the 6th P.M. section line of Section 6, Township B. Laurence Pond No. 2 Point of Diversion: The center of Laurence Pond No. 2 is located at a point 1200 feet from the 7 South, h section � Range1ne and 1750 feet from 87 West of the 6th P.M. east section fine of Section 6, p C. Laurence Pond No. 3 Point of Diversion: The center of I.aurence Pond No. 3 is located at a point 1800 feet from the south section line and 1600 feet from the west section line of Section 6, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6th P.M. D. Laurence Pond No, 4 Point of Diversion: The center of Laurence Pond No. 4 is located at a point 1150 feet from the south section line and 1450 feet from the west section line of Section 6, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6th P.M E. Laurence Ditch, First Enlargement Point of Diversion: The point of diversion is located on the West bank of Mesa Creek in the SE'/. NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 6 South, Range 88 West of the 6"' P.M., at a point whence the East quarter Corner of said Section 36 bears South 52 ° 30' East 438 feet. m lt, 11 Source of Water for Laurence Pond Nto•CoultcrThe C eelk ande from f� m Mesae water S � sand Weste run-t: ff and seepage waters tributary Coulter Creek via the Laurence Ditch, all tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork River. W:1S L C\88 M3\PkadinpU\mended Application for WRs Plan For Aug 7•3 1.02.doc AUG -15-2002 THU 04:05 PM PMK pc FM NO. 9709256847 P, 05/15 District Court, Water Division e Page 4 Case No. 02CW 108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation Source of Water for Laurence Ditch, First Enlargement: The source of the water is Mesa Creek, tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork River. 12. Amount claimed for Laurence Pond No. 1: 20 acre feet, conditional, with the right to fill and refill continuously year round in priority. Amount claimed for Laurence Pond No. 2: 20 acre feet, conditional, with the right to fill and refill continuously year round in priority. Amount claimed for Laurence Pond No. 3: 30 acre feet, conditional, with the right to fill and refill continuously year round in priority. Amount claimed for Laurence Pond No. 4: 30 acre feet, conditional, with the right to fall and refill continuously year round in priority. Amount claimed for Laurence Ditch, First Enlargement: 6.0 c.f.s., conditional, with the right to divert year round in priority. 13. New, Additional Use Claimed: Augmentation, indtoDiversions through store consumptive use credits associated with dry up of historically irrigated acreage. the Laurence Ditch into the Laurence Pond described inos. 1-4 dtheleases of such storae augmentation plan sat fotrth er will be made for augmentation purposes, , herein. 14. Total capacity of Reservoirs: amounts claimed above, all of which are active capacity. A. Date of Appropriation for Augmentation Use: January 15, 2002 B. Date Water applied to Beneficial Use for Augmentation Use: nia C. How appropriation was initiated for Augmentation Use: Formulation of intent to apply water to beneficial use, field inspection, devising d sing pan to utilize ponds and ditch structures for augmentation of development 15. The name of the present owner of the land upon which f the land upoints on diversions on are ter ated is: Applicant; names and addresses of the s owill be used is: Applicant. ce 16. Remarks: Water rights for the LaureinncCase No 95Cw9ond Nos. 1-4 4 Water Divd the ision No. Ditch, This Enlargement were previously decreed application does not seek a change to those water rights., rather, it simply seeks to add a new use for these structures for augmentation purposes. W:\S L C188 MS\Pltudint/Wreended Application for Wns Plan For Aug 7-3'+.-02.doe AUG -15-2002 THU 04:05 PM PMK pc FAX NO. 9709256847 District Court, Water Division Page 5 Case No. 02CW108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation THIRD CLAIla HANCE DF WATER RIGkS 17. Name of structures and water rights for which change sso ght: Cod Resdrvted,Re a vond oir; Consolidated Reservoir, Fust Enlargement; Enlargement; Ralston Reservoir No. 1; Ralston Reservoir No. 1, First Enlargement; Laurence Ditch 18. Information from original decrees: Structure Consolidated Reservoir Consolidated Reservoir, l" Enlargement Consolidated Reservoir, rd Enlargement Case Number; Court Decreed Amount (Amount Owned by Applicant) C.A. 2144; Garfield Adiifdication Date 595 AF, absolute (201/4 or 2/15/1921 County District Court 119 AF) C.A. 4613; Garfield 285.6 AF, absolute (20% County District Court or 57.12 AF) Ralston Reservoir No, 1, Priority l OAAA Ralston Reservoir No. 1,1' Enlargement Laurence Ditch C.A. 5884; Garfield 401 AF, absolute (20% or County District Court 80.2 AF) C.A. 2150; Garfield 34.3 AF, absolute (100%) County District Court C.A. 4033; Garfield 45.6 AF, absolute (100%) County District Court W-2743; Garfield 4.0 cfs, absolute (100%/x) County District Court - A. P. 06/15 Appropriation Date 9/8/1898 6/20/1958 9/1/1948 11/5/1971 1/1711921 10/24/1952 9/1/1948 9/1/1904 12/31/1975 9/1/1945 5/1/1973 Decreed points of diversion: 1. The southeast end of the dam of Consolidated Reservoir is located at a point from which the common quarter corners of Sections 19 and 20, Township 6 South, Range 87 West of the 6th P.M., bears North 50°90' East, a distance of 587.2 feet. 2. The Ralston Reservoir No. 1 is located at a point whence the North quarter corner of Section 31, Township 6 South, Range 87 West of the 6th P.M. bears South 28°05' West 6,605 feet and said reservoir is located in the W:\S L C\Bs M3'.Pleadings\.0.rnondcd Application for Wets Plan For Aug 7.3 02.doc AUG -15-2002 THU 04:06 PM PMK pc FAX NO, 9709256847 P. 07/15 District Court, Water Division o Page 6 Case No. 02CW108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 6 South, Range 87 West of the 6th P.M. 3. The point of diversion of Laurence Ditch is located on the West bank of Mesa Creek in the SE t/. NE '/. of Section 36, T. 65., R. 88W. of the 6th P.M. at a point whence the East Quarter Corner of said Section 36 bears S. 52° 30' E. B. Sources: 1. Consolidated Reservoir source of supply is from the West branch of Coulter Creek, tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to Roaring Fork River. 2. Ralston Reservoir No. 1 source of supply is from Roaring Fork River.the West branch of Coulter Creek, tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary 3. Laurence Ditch source of supply is from Mesa Creek, tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to Roaring Fork River. 19. Historic use: The Consolidated Reservoir, Ralston Reservoir No. 1 and Laurence Ditch rights have been used historically to irrigate approximately 281 acres of hay meadow on the 480 acre Laurence Ranch Property. Of this amount, approximately 31.15 acres will be permanently removed from historic irrigation by the creation of lots and the development of roads, infrastructure and homesites. 20, Proposed change: Applicant seeks to change a portion of each of the above-described water rights for use as augmentation of out -of -priority consumptive stream depletions associated with development of the Laurence Ranch Property described in the augmentation plan set forth herein. Applicant seeks to determine and confirm the consumptive use associated with the historic irrigation of 31.15 acres to be dried up and the use of the above-described water rights on such acreage. Applicant's engineer estimates the consumptive use credit available from the historic irrigation of the 31.15 acres is 1.77 acre-feet per acre. Such dry up will make available approximately 55.6 acre-feet of consumptive use credits. These consumptive use credits accrue approximately on the following monthly basis: 0.40 af in April; 10.65 af in May; 14.62 af in June; 13.23 af in July; 8.25 af in August; 7.09 af in September; and 1.36 af in October. To the extent additional dry -up acreage is identified under Applicant's development plans during the course of this proceeding, Applicant seeks to quantify and confirm the historic consumptive use associated with such additional acreage and utilize such credits for augmentation in the same manner described above. Applicant claims and reserves all right to, and has no intent to abandon such consumptive use credits resulting from the dry -up of historically irrigated land which are not presently dedicated to this plan for augmentation. W;LS L Cm, M3\121radings\Attendi d Application for Wrts Plan For Aug 7-31.02.doC HUG -1b -2U2 1HU U4W1 FM 1'[1K pc FAX NO. 9709256847 P, 08/15 District Court, Water Division Page 7 Case No. 02CW108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation FOURTH CLAIM A,PPT,ICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PIAN FOR AUCIEATS 21. Name of structures to be augmented: A. Laurence Ranch Well No. 1, as described in the First Claim above: B. Laurence Ranch Well No. 2, as described in the First Claim above; C. Laurence Ranch Well No. 3, as described in the First Claim above; D. Laurence Ranch Well No. 4, as described in the First Claim above; E. Laurence Ranch Well No. 5; as described in the First Claim above. 22. Description of water rights to be used for augmentation. A. Water rights for the Laurence Pond Nos. 1-4 and Laurence Ditch, First Enlargement, as described in the Second Claim above. B. Consumptive use credits associated with dry -up of lands historically irrigated under water rights for the Consolidate Reservoir, Ralston Reservoir No. 1 and Laurence Ditch, as described in the Third Claim above. 23. Statement of Plan for Augmentation: Applicant intends to develop 26 luxury home sites on the 480 acre Laurence Ranch Property, which is existing ranch land in the Cattle Creek drainage near the confluence with Coulter Creek. In addition to the 26 home sites, there will be an equestrian facility and up to ten (10) horses. The home sites will be developed primarily on the non- agricultural portions of the 480 acres and the ranching and farming operation will remain largely intact. All domestic and larvn/garden irrigation water will be supplied by diversions from the Wells described in the First Claim above, which will be connected to a central water supply system. All water rights applied for and involved herein are a part of an integrated water supply plan. All domestic in-house wastewater will be disposed of through individual septic tank and leach fields and is assumed to be 15% consumptive. The estimated year round water demand for the residential dwelling units and the lawn/garden irrigation, and the associated consumptive use is set forth in the Table attached as Exhibit °'B." The estimated in-house/building water demand has been WAS L C\83 M31Plcadings\Amcn3cd Application for Wrts Plan For Aus 1 1.02.do: AUG -15-2002 THU 04:07 PM PMK Pc FAX NO, 9709256847 P, 09/15 District Court, Water Division Page 8 Case No. 02CW108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation converted to Equivalent Residential Units (EQR's), where an EQR is dcfined as in - building demand for 3.5 persons using 100 gallons per person per day. Two EQRs are assumed for each residential/building unit, including any associated accessory dwelling unit. This results in 52 EQR's for the in-house water demand at full build out of the development. Actual details of the development may vary, so long as the total EQR water demand covered hereunder is not exceeded. In addition to the in-house uses there will be up to 11.93 acres of lawn, garden and landscape irrigation (approximately 20,000 square feet per lot). The water demand for irrigation is 2.19 acre feet per acre using the Blaney Criddle method. Consumptive use for this irrigation demand is 1.76 acre feet per acre. There will also be water use associated with an equestrian facility boarding up to 10 horses. It is assumed the water requirements for horses is 11 gallons per day per horse and that amount is 100% consumptive. There will be a daily water use in the barn facility of 100 gallons per day. the As set forth in the Table the diversion of 47.09 acre-feet of attached ,water per demand for The development will require t associated consumptive use is approximately 24.38 acre-feet of water per year. The Laurence Ranch Wells will operate under the conditional priorities described in the First Claim. Stream depletions identified hereunder will take into account delayed pumping effects to the surface stream system and the water requirements Table (Exhibit "B") may be adjusted to reflect this. During the irrigation season, when there is a valid call being administered that requires replacement of out of priority depletions caused by the pumping from described in the First Claim above, consumptive use credits associated with dry -up of land historically irrigated under the water rights, as described in the Third Clairn above, will be bypassed at the Laurence Ditch headgate and/or released from the Consolidated and/or Ralston Reservoirs in the monthly amounts depicted in Column 12 of the Table attached as Exhibit "B" for the months April through October. To the extent this dry -up credit is insufficient in any given month to replace all out of priority depletions, Applicant will supplement with augmentation water releases from the Laurence Ponds, as described in the Second Claim above. During the non -irrigation season, when there is a valid call being administered that requires replacement of out of priority depletions caused by the pumping from the Wells described in the First Claim above, augmentation water will be released from one or more of the four Laurence Ponds in the monthly amounts shown in Column 12 of the Table attached as Exhibit "B." The Laurence Pond Nos. 14 will be tilled in priority during the non -irrigation season and will store consumptive use credits from the dry -up acreage for later augmentation use, W:1$ L CIS& M31PtuadinoWnended Application for Wrts Plan For Aug 7.31.02,doc Huv-iS-�uu� ItIU u4 tJ VII 1-T1 pc f•M NU. 5 (UU2bU841 P, 10/15 District Court, Water Division , Page 9 Case No. 02C W LOS Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation WHEREFORE, the Applicant respectfully requests the Court award a decree: 1. Confirming and granting a decree for the underground water rights claimed in the First Claim above; 2. Confirming and granting a decree for the new, additional use of augmentation for the water rights and structures identified in the Second Claim above; 3. Confirming and granting a decree for the change of water rights identified in the Third Claim above; 4. Approving the plan for augmentation described herein; and, 5. Finding that the operation of this plan for augmentation will not cause injury to the appropriativc system or owners of vested or decreed conditional water rights. Respectfully submitted this 31" day of July 2002. PATRICK, MILLER. & KROPF, P.C. A Professional Corporation Name and Address of Applicant: SLC -Laurence, LLC P.O. Box 6119 0021 Burnt Mountain Circle Snowmass Village, CO 81615 B Scott C. Miller, No. 26181 730 E. Durant St., Suite 200 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-1028 millarrd2w c m ATTORNEYS FOR THE APPLICANT WINS 1C\SS M3WleadingiN.Arnended Application for Wru Plan For Aug ?-3142,dot; AUG -15-2002 THU 04:09 PM PMK pc FAX NO. 9709256847 District Court, Water Division Page 10 Case No. 02CW108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation This APPLICATION FOR UN RIGHT$. C ;.N OF WATER RIGHT AUGMENTATION w• -d to the Court throu ceder As required by those rules, the original signed copy of this AMENDED APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS, NEW WATER RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS AND APPROVAL Of PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION is on file with Patrick, Miller &Kropf P.C. D WATER RIGHTS,.VVATER ROVAL OF PL O lectro is ' in} .to ed ,. WAS L 0188 M31Pleadings\Amen Application for Wrs Plan For Aug 7-3 I.02.doc P. 11/15 Hai -lb -ewe IHU U4;uy rn VIII pc JUL-31-2002 ICED 01153 PM FMK pc h RX NU, y (UU2bb84 FAX NO. 9709256847 District Couit, Water Division 5 Page 11. Case No. 0211:W108 Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approvtl of Plan for Augmentation 'VERIFICATION P, 12/15 P. 12 STAT OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) C I, John Serpa, Director of Development for SLC -Laurence, LLC, a Delaware Limited have read the Liability Ccmpany, being first duly sworn upon t i oath, depose and say sane is atrt to the 'gest foregcing Amended Application, knows the contents thereof, ' that thea of my infornation, knowledge and belief. Jarpa, Director • ' vclopnmeft Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3Is y of July 2002 by Jonn Serpa. W itopss my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: • WAS , GNU ti3TIoadingeArnerscied Application for Wrr+ Pim For Aug 741412.116c AUG -15-2002 THU 04:10 PM PMK pc FAX NO. 9709256847 P. 13/15 District Court, Water Division . Page 12 Case No. 02CW10S Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights and Approval of Plan for Augmentation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 31st day of July 2002, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Amended Application for Underground Water Rights, New Water Rights, Change of Water Rights and Approval of Nan for Augmentation in the captioned case was served via JusticeLink on the following: Mary Mead Harrunond, Esq. Karl D. Ohlsen, Esq. Carlson, Hammond & Paddock, LLC 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 3900 Denver, CO 80203-4539 Lori J.M. Satterfield, Esq. Balcornb & Green, P.C. P.O. Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Scan T. McAllister, Esq. Assistant Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street, 5th, Floor Denver, CO 80203 W SS L C'\SS M:\Pterudin€s\Amended Application fot W'rta Plein For Aug 7.31-02F NAL,dor AUG -15-2002 THU 04:10 PM PMK ac FAX NO. 9709256847 P. 14/15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SNOWMASS LAND CO. - LAURENCE RANCH WATER REQUIREMENTS Consumptive Use (12) TOTAL to (D(D CO OCf) OO ch r- I"- V' (() N CO CO a) Q) (O IN N N N V' (h r M V' CO N N O CO O O V' to to N N O 0 0 CO (0, N (11) Livestock O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d N N- O (10) Crop Irrigation 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o (9) Lawn Irrigation 0 0 0 co CO COCCO CO O CO 0 O 000 OvO N-Lf)0O O O o 0 V' tf) to M N O O O O `- N (8) Commercial or Other 000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O (7) Domestic In-house O0 to O (OO M CI(0to COOO COO ( COO (0 CO N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 00 10 O fo Total Demand (6) TOTAL N co co CO to 0 00 ti CO 00 LO CO 000 1110 t` 0 V' (OO n A N V- (O OD 00 N to N '- 47.091 (5) Livestock 00)0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co O (4) Crop Irrigation O 0 p0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O (3) Lawn Irrigation 000v-�CMa)coc00 C7 0 0 0 tri (O (O cri (c) 0 0 0 26.476 (2) Equestrian barn O O CO O CO O O O O O CO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000 OD 0 0 (1) Domestic In-house co co (o C7 co (h M (o Li"). N CD N: CO f- (o O co „ O N Month W N L's al E v of D s in E E CI '= > ao o £.)o. > o ( t -5 0 o a) 'TOTALS —> �1BtT 15 Attachment 9 USDA -RCS Soils Designations and Tables Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 USDA -RCS Soils Designations Map Numerical Symbol Soil Map Unit 4 Acree Loam 6-12% 18 Cochetopa-Antrobus Association 12-25% 35 Empedrado Loam 6-12% 48 Fughes Stony Loam 3-12% 59 Lyers Loam 6-25% 87 Morval-Tridell Complex 12-50% 94 Showalter-Morval Complex 5-15% 95 Showalter-Morval Complex 15-25% 104 Torriorthents-Cambrothids-Rock Outcrop Complex 6-65% 106 Tridell-Brownsto Stony Sandy Loams 12-50% (extremely stony) Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 1 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 17 substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter and jMorvsoils. Included areas make up about 10 percent al of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 Iinches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used mainly for irrigated crops or as 4 `°'hayland. It also is used for pasture or homesite development. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly etterman needlegrass, Idaho fescue, western heatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon rviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are slender wheatgrass, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, elk sedge, and scattered Gambel oak. The average annual roduction of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds r acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain ig sagebrush, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, Kentucky uegrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. If the quality of range vegetation has seriously eteriorated, seeding is needed. The suitability of this nit for range seeding is good. This unit is well suited to irrigated crops. Corrugation gation is suited to this unit. If furrow or corrugation .gation systems are used, runs should be on the tour or across the slope. Because of the slow rmeability in the subsoil, the application of water iould be regulated so that water does not stand on the rface and damage the crops. The content of organic tier can be maintained by using all crop residue, ing under cover crops, and using a suitable tion. Crops respond to applications of nitrogen and osphorus fertilizer. If properly managed, the unit can uce 90 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A bed should be prepared on the contour or across slope where practical. Proper stocking rates, ure rotation, and restricted grazing during wet ods help to keep the pasture in good condition and tect the soil from erosion. Fertilizer is needed to re the optimum growth of grasses and legumes. If perly managed. the unit can produce 4 tons of ted grass hay per acre annually. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. main limitations are a high shrink -swell potential, strength, and the slow permeability. Structures, itary facilities, roads, and landscaping should be gned and planned to reflect these limitations. lation growth has resulted in increased ruction of homes in areas of this soil. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. ) 4—Acree loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 4 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 13 inches is clay. The next layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter and Morval soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used mainly for irrigated hay or pasture. It also is used as rangeland, for a limited number of irrigated crops, or for homesite development. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly Letterman needlegrass, Idaho fescue, western wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are slender wheatgrass, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, elk sedge, and scattered Gambel oak. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, Kentucky bluegrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. If the quality of range vegetation has seriously deteriorated, seeding is needed. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is good. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A seedbed should be prepared on the contour or across the slope where practical. All adapted pasture plants can be grown, but bunch -type species planted alone generally are not suitable because of the hazard of erosion. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Fertilizer is needed to ensure the optimum growth of grasses and legumes. If properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is suited to irrigated crops. It is limited 1 1 ,e 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mainly by the slope. Corrugation irrigation is suited to this unit. If furrow or corrugation irrigation systems are used, runs should be on the contour or across the slope. Because of the slow permeability in td eo that subsoit the application of water should be reg water does not stand on the surface and damage the crops. The content of organic matter can be maintained by using all crop residue, plowing under cover crops, and using a suitable rotation. Crps resondlfertilizer. If applications of nitrogen and phosphorus 80 bushels of properly managed, the unit can produce barley per acre annually. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are ehr�eabilit sStrll ucurest'san�ary w strength, and the slow p Y facilities, roads, and landscaping should be designed and planned to reflect these limitations. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes on this soil. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. 5—Acree loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, -11 drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slo yes. it formed in alluvium and residuum derived dom .antly from redbed sandstone and shale. ELeVation ion is 6,5" to 8,200 feet. The average annual p e ciis 16 to 8 inches, the average annual air tem • rature is 38 to 4' degrees F, and the average frost- ee period is 95 to 10 days. Typically, e surface layer is dark gra sh inches brownof the loam about 10 ' ches thick. The upper subsoil is clay to m. The lower 13 in es is clay. The next layer is clay , am about 7 inc ' s thick. The substratum to a dep of 60 inche . or more is clay loam. The soil is non=lcareous o a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below t'at de. h. Included in this unit ars s, all areas of Showalter and Morval soils. Also include. -re small areas of soils that are similar to the Acree• .abou ',tit are coarser 15 percent of the total red. included areas make acreage. Permeability is . ow in the Acr capacity is high he effective rooti inches or mors Runoff is rapid, and t erosion is •derate. This un is used mainly as rangeland. as wildli = habitat. Th- potential plant community on this unit . mainly Letterman needlegrass, Idaho fescue, western wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskat'•n serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site slender wheatgrass, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, elk sedge, ra Ian wee Th The m This The mai potential. This ma nonirrigated. d Gambel oak. The average annual production of vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the e condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrus leaf rabbitbrush, Kentucky bluegrass, and ann s increase in abundance. suitability of this unit for range seeding is f in limitation is the slope. nit is poorly suited to homesite develo• ent. limitations are the slope and the shri k -swell unit is in capability subclass VIe It is in the Mountain Loam ran • site. m, 1 to 12 percent slope This deep, is on fans and uplands. t formed in dominantly from calca ous redbed le. Elevation is 6,0'0 to 7,800 feet. 1 precipitation is 1 ' to 14 inches, the emperature is 4 to 46 degrees F, t -free period is :5 to 105 days. e layer is re dish brown loam he upper 3 inches of the subsoil lower 1 inches is sandy clay a dep of 60 inches or more 11 is oncalcareous to a depti s .etow that depth. all areas of Empedrado about 20 percent of the soil. Available water depth is 60 e hazard of water also is used are 6 --Rimy to well drained so alluvium derive sandstone and s The average annu average annual air and the average fro Typically, the sur about 8 inches thick. is fine sandy loam. Th loam. The substratum t is fine sandy loam. The of 11 inches and calcareo included in this unit are soils. Included areas mak total acreage. Permeability is moder water capacity is high inches or more. Runo water erosion is mo This unit is used potential plant co wheatgrass, Indi Douglas rabbit Prairie }unegr bluegrassI production acre. If th sagebrus annual The Loss the u T limi fe pr to in he Almy soil. Available he effe, tive rooting depth is 6 is mediu , and the hazard of rate. s rangeland • hayland. The munity is mainly •luebunch n ricegrass, bottle. ushsagebrush.squi it ush, and Wyoming s, needleandthread, a • Sandberg a • are included. The avera•a annual air-dry vegetation is about 50 pounds range condition deteriorates, y ing , Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgra- , and -eds increase in abundance. uitability of this unit for range seedi • is goo the surface layer severely reduces th ability it to produce plants suitable for grazing. is unit is well suited to hay and o a pasture. welif 1a has tions. Grasses and legumes g qu lizer is used. If properly managed, y peer unitcre c duce 5 tons of irrigated grass an This unit is well suited to homesite development. This map unit i Itis in capability heoting Loaml�rangeisa( and nonirrigated. 1 1 26 1 1 stonin: ildings and roads should be de ' = ed to offset the effectsinking and s The high content of rock fragments excavation difficult. This map unit is i - = •ability suit : Vle, nonirrigated. Ti - ochetopa soil is in the -I•ine Loam •e site, and the Antrobus soil is in the am range site. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18--Cochetopa-Antrobus association, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This map unit is on mountainsides and fans. Elevation is 8,500 to 10,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 20 inches, the average annual air temperature is 36 to 38 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 45 to 60 days. This unit is about 45 percent Cochetopa loam and 35 percent Antrobus very stony loam. The Cochetopa soil is in broad, slightly concave areas, and the Antrobus soil is on the steeper convex slopes. Included in this unit are small areas of Forsey and Jerry soils, included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Cochetopa soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to 20 percent. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 3 inches thick. The lower part is very dark grayish brown clay loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is loam.gravelly clay ches and is noncalcareous to a depth of 40 to 60 calcareous below that depth. Permeability is slow in the Cochetopa soil. Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Antrobus soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 15 to 25 percent. About 12 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with stones, and 25 percent is covered with cobbles. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is dark grayish brown very stony loam about 8 inches thick. The lower part is brown very stony loam about 5 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is extremely stony loam. The soil is calcareous throughout. Permeability is moderate in the Antrobus soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland or for homesite development. The potential plant community on the Cochetopa soil is mainly Thurber fescue, bearded wheatgrass, Columbia needlegrass, mountain brome, and Idaho Soil Survey fescue. Western wheatgrass, mountain snowberry, geranium, western yarrow, aspen also are included. The annual production of air- dry vegetation is about 2,800 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Kentucky bluegrass, geranium, Douglas rabbitbrush, and western yarrow increase in abundance. The potential plant community on the Antrobus soil is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, needlegrasses, antelope bitterbrush, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are Douglas rabbitbrush and mountain snowberry. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,200 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, needlegrasses, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The main limitations are the slope and the stones on the surface. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitations are a high shrink -swell potential and the stoniness. Buildings and roads should be designed to offset the effects of shrinking and swelling. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, nonirrigated. The Cochetopa soil is in the Subalpine Loam range site, and the Antrobus soil is in the Stony Loam range site. 9—Cochetopa-Antrobus association, 25 to per nt slopes. This map unit is on mountainsi• s. Elevateis 8,500 to 10,500 feet. The average :nnuai precipitateis 18 to 20 inches, the average : nnual air temperature 36 to 38 degrees F, and t average frost -free perio is 45 to 60 days. This unit is ab• t 45 percent Coc : opa loam and 40 percent Antrobus ve stony loa he Cochetopa soil is on slightly concave • - nches - nd the Antrobus soil is on the steeper convex s included in this unit ar = all areas of Forsey and Jerry soils. Included ar the total acreage. The Cochetop oil is deep an well drained. It formed in alluv' . m and colluvium de ed dominantly from basalt. ' ope is 25 to 40 percent. ypicafy, the upper pa •f the surface layer is dark grish brown loam as t 3 inches thick. The lower part i ery dark grayi brown clay loam about 11 inches thic The sub •11 is clay loam about 24 inches thick. The s •stratum to a depth of 60 inches is gravelly cia am. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 40 to 5 e up about 15 percent of 36 This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is w 1 sui -d to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes •row well r adequate fertilizer is used. If properly m. aged, the unt can produce 5 tons of irrigated gras ay per acre ann The pot western whe junegrass, mo rabbitbrush. Oth muttongrass, Lett snowberry, Utah se The average annual p about 1,500 pounds per deteriorates, mountain bluegrass, Douglas ra increase in abundan'e. This unit is well .cited to alfa a and small grain crops. It has few mitations. Main : ining crop residue on or near the rface helps to con •I runoff and soil blowing and Ips to maintain tilth an the content of organic ma r. If properly managed, the unit can produce 9bushels of barley per acre annually. This it is suited to homesite developm: nt. The main li+ ttations are the shrink -swell potentia . nd the mod ate permeability. The shrink -swell potent = I can be inimized by thoroughly prewetting foundatio arras. The moderate permeability can be overcom: by creasing the size of the absorption field. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigate and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 35—Empedrado loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep. well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is about 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam throughout. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well ally. tial plant community on thi nit is mainly tgrass, needleandthrea• , prairie tain big sagebrush and Douglas plants that ch - acterize this site are an needleass, common iceberry and antelope bitterbrush. du on of air-dry vegetation is re. If the range condition agebrush, Kentucky h, and annual weeds Soil Survey suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It is limited mainly by the slope in some areas. Limiting tillage during seedbed preparation and controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. All tillage should be on the contour or across the slope. If properly managed, the unit can produce 75 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry, Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the slope. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by prewetting foundation areas. The slope is a management concern if septic tank absorption fields are installed. Absorption lines should be installed on the contour. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 6--Empedrado loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes Thi deep, well drained soil is on fans and uplan.n is It for -d in alluvium and eolian material. Elev- 6,500 t• 9,000 feet. The average annual pre. 'Ration is 15 to 18 1 •rhes, the average annual air te• perature is 40 to 44 de. ees F, and the average fr- t -free period t: 75 to 95 days. Typically, the .urface layer is • •wn loam about 5 inches thick. The bsoil is cla oam about 35 inches thick. The substrata to a d- •th of 60 inches or more clay loam. The soil is • alcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareou • : ow that depth. Included t in this edr•ado sot •ll areas of soils ut are silt loam or that silty are similar to the • clay loam. o included are s II areas of soils that are simi - to the Empedrado sot • ut have a darker, thick: surface layer. Included area make up about 1! pe ent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Emperedo soil. -Gypsum Area, Colorado Ivied in this unit are small areas of sandstone ps. Included areas make up about 5 percent I acreage. eability is moderate in the Forsey soil. acity also is moderate. The effective inches or more. Runoff is mediu er erosion is moderate. used as rangeland or as ant community is mai ongrass, prairie ju Saskatoon se ize this sit snow egress, mounta ,rush. The avera tation is about 1.20 on deteriorates, cky bluegrass. :se in abund suitabilit anical tr s on t ss b aitable ooting and the life habitat. bluebunch grass. mountain iceberry. Other are Columbia rry, and antelope a+ ual production of air-dry pounds per acre. If the range tain big sagebrush, ss, and annual weeds a heatg ce. of this unit for .nge seeding is poor. tment is not pract al because of the surface and the slop. The slope limits vestock. The limited acce sibility results in rig of the less sloping areas. unit is poorly suited to homesite • -velopment. ain limitation is the slope. s map unit is in capability subclass VII igated. It is in the Stony Loam range site. Fughes stony loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes. deep, well drained soil is on foot slopes. It formed uvium and colluvium derived dominantly from alcareous shale. Elevation is 6,500 to 8,500 feet. average annual precipitation is 14 to 17 inches, the rage annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, the average frost -free period is 80 to 100 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown stony loam ut 6 inches thick. The next layer is brown clay loam ut 10 inches thick. The upper 8 inches of the subsoil ark reddish brown clay. The lower 26 inches is ish brown clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 es or more is clay loam. cluded in this unit are small areas of soils that are liar to the Fughes soil but have 5 to 20 percent bbles in the profile and soils that are similar to the hes soil but have mottles below a depth of 50 es. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the 1 acreage. Permeability is slow in the Fughes soil. Available ter capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 es or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of er erosion is moderate. This unit is used as hayland or rangeland. It can be d for irrigated crops if water is made available. It is I suited to hay and pasture. If the unit is used for 43 irrigated hay, the main limitation is the slope in some areas. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. If this unit is used for irrigated crops, the main limitations are the stoniness and the slope in some areas. If properly managed, the unit can produce 80 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly Idaho fescue, slender wheatgrass, and mountain big sagebrush. Other plants that characterize this site are big bluegrass, Saskatoon serviceberry, and mountain snowberry. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, Kentucky bluegrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this soil for range seeding is good. Brush management improves deteriorated areas of range that are producing more woody shrubs than were present in the potential plant community. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitation is the shrink -swell potential. The effects of shrinking and swelling can be reduced by maintaining a constant moisture content around the foundation. Backfilling excavations with material that has a low shrink -swell potential can also reduce the effects of shrinking and swelling. Septic tank absorption fields of conventional size do not function adequately because of the slow permeability. Other kinds of sewage disposal systems may be needed. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. 9--Goslin fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slo This 'eep, well drained soil is on toe slopes, fans, • d terrace It formed in colluvium and alluvium deri •d dominant from redbed sandstone and shale. evation is 6,200 to 00 feet. The average annual • ecipitation is 12 to 14 inc -s, the average annual ai emperature is 42 to 46 degr- -s F, and the averag= rost-free period is 85 to 105 days. Typically, the state.- layer is n ',dish brown fine sandy loam about 5 inc . s thi• . The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is fine dy loam. The soil is calcareous throughout. Included in this u ' are smal - reas of Almy soils and Gostin soils that e steeper slop=- than those on this Gostin soil. Al . included are small a as of soils that are similar • this Gostin soil but have a -tong surface layer. I uded areas make up about 15 p cent of the tota creage. ermeability is moderately rapid in this Gos soil. vailable water capacity is moderate. The effect! Soil Survey This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, rigated. It is in the Loamy Slopes range site. derived ,600 fe nches, th degrees F. days. Typically, dark grayish thick. The low nches thick. Th Hard, dolomitic I 34 inches. The d inches. The soil is Included in this Leavittville, Cushool, make up about 10 pe Permeability is mod Available water capacit depth is 20 to 40 inches. hazard of water erosion' This unit is used mai wildlife habitat. The potential plant elk sedge, big bluegr snowberry, and mo characterize this si wheatgrass, con serviceberry. Th vegetation is a condition dete bluegrass, el abundance The suit Mechan stony s Thi The rrawaddy very stony loam, 25 to 65 pe ent This moderately deep, well drained sol is on insides. It formed in colluvium and res uum ominantly from limestone. Elevatio is 8,200 to t. The average annual precipitatio is 16 to 20 average annual air temperatur- is 36 to 42 and the average frost -free pe od is 60 to 75 e upper part of the surf own very stony loam a part is very chann substratum is ver estone bedrock h to bedrock alcareous th it are smal and Ren ent of rate is y e layer is very out 5 inches r loam about 9 channery loam. s at a depth of about nges from 20 to 40 ughout. areas of Jerry, Forsey, ac soils. Included areas e total acreage. the Irrawaddy soil. w. The effective rooting unoff is medium, and the moderate. r grazing. It also is used as ommu ity on this unit is mainly ss, Gam 'el oak, mountain tain brom: Other plants that are Columb : needlegrass, slender on chokecherry, and Saskatoon average annual p •duction of air-dry ut 2,000 pounds pe acre. If the range orates, Gambel oak, K. ntucky sedge, and annual weed increase in ility of this unit for range see ng is poor. treatment is not practical becau e of the ace and the slope. unit is poorly suited to homesite level• •ment. ain limitations are the slope and the larg: stones. is map unit is in capability subclass Vile, n• irrigated. It is in the Brushy Loam range site. 59--lyers loam, 6 to 25 percent slopes. This moderately deep, well drained soil is on hills, ridges, and mountainsides. It formed in residuum and colluvium derived dominantly from calcareous shale. Elevation is 8,000 to 10,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 20 inches, the average annual air temperature is 37 to 39 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 50 to 70 days. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado about 3 inches thick. The next layer is clay about 9 inches thick. The substratum is clay about 25 inches thick over shale. The depth to calcareous shale ranges from 20 to 40 inches. The soil is calcareous throughout. included in this unit are small areas of Forsey, Cochetopa, Antrobus, Anvik, Skylick, and Sligting soils. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the lyers soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used as rangeland or as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community is mainly Thurber fescue, Idaho fescue, and needlegrasses. Other plants that characterize this site are slender wheatgrass, nodding brome, and silver sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 2,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, silver agebrush and Kentucky bluegrass increase in bundance. Range seeding may be needed if the range in poor condition. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and e slope in the steeper areas. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle. It is in the ubalpine Loam range site. p--Iyers loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes. This rately deep, well drained soil is on hills, rid • s, untainsides. It formed in residuum and c, luvium erived ominantly from calcareous shale. Ele :tion is ,000 to ',000 feet. The average annual pr ipitation 18 to 20 aches, the average annual air t perature 37 to 39 d rees F, and the average fr.. t -free period 50 to 70 day Typically, the rface layer is grayis •rown loam but 3 inches thic The next layer i clay about 9 +rhes thick. The su • tratum is clay : bout 25 inches k over shale. The •th to cal . reous shale ranges m 20 to 40 inches. Th soil is alcareous throughout. ncluded in this unit are .m- areas of Forsey, hetopa, Antrobus, Anvik .kylick, and Sligting soils. uded areas make up a 15 percent of the total gage. ;Permeability is slo n the lye soil. Available water ;permeability is low. Th- -ffeciive root depth is 20 to 40 es. Runoff is pid, and the hazd of water erosion vere on th - steeper slopes. his unit i • used as rangeland or as ildlife habitat. poten ' - I plant community is mainly urber fescue, o fe ue, and needlegrasses. Other p1. is that a • rize this site are slender wheatgras nodding and silver sagebrush. The average an al t Su site his Iall 00 14t to �5 rch Ioa de m Area, Colorado 61 er 4 inches is loam. The substratum to ches or more is loam. The soil is s to a depth of 19 inches. this unit are small areas of Tride . nd 'Is. Included areas make up ab• 15 otal acreage. moderate in the Marv- soil. Available is moderate. The : ective rooting more. Runoff i- medium, and the is modera gelan•. The potential plant a hread, western irie junegrass, and big t ' aracterize this site are d mou ain muhly. The ion of air- • vegetation is about e. If the range .•ndition grass and Kentuck •Iuegrass ance. oorly suited to homesite de lopment. itations are the shrink -swell pot +tial and 4° Jiffy al pinches Ater erosi ==is used as r s mainly nee muttongrass, :'Other plants t heatgrass ual prod ds per s, the abu p unit is in capability subclass Vle, d. It is in the Deep Loam range site. rval loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes. Thi drained soil is on alluvial fans. It forme • in erived dominantly from basalt. Elevati• is ,000 feet. The average annual precis ation is hes, the average annual air tem.-rature is ees F, and the average frost- ee period is ays. Ily, the ick. The e lower 4 i 160 inches o reous to a de ed in this unit ar r soils. Included a of the total acrea ,eability is moder sacity also is 60 inches or f water ero nit is use ityism ss, m sh, 0 ch urface layer is brown •am about 7 per 12 inches of e subsoil is clay ches is loam. e substratum to a. ore is loa• . The soil is of 19 ' ches. sm 1 areas of Tridell and s make up about 15 e in e Morval soil. Available oderate. The effective rooting ore. Runo is rapid, and the on is moderat= or severe. as rangeland. Th: potential plant ly needleandthread, estern ongrass, prairie junegr-.s, and big er plants that characterize is site are eatgrass and mountain muhly. The ual production of air-dry vegetatiis about nds per acre. If the range condition ates, cheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass in abundance. This • •oorly suited to ho The main limitatio • •e. This ma• s in cap. •' ' subclass Vile. ated. It is in the Deep Loam - • • : ite. velopment. 87—Morval-Tridell complex, 12 to 50 percent slopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans and mountainsides. Elevation is 6,800 to 8,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 95 days. This unit is about 55 percent Morval loam and 30 percent Tridell moderately stony loam. The Morval soil is in slightly concave areas, and the Tridell soil is in convex areas. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter very stony loam and small areas of Rock outcrop. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to 40 percent. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Tridell soil is deep and somewhat excessively drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to 50 percent. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is grayish brown stony sandy loam about 2 inches thick. The lower part is very cobbly fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the substratum is very cobbly fine sandy loam. The next 11 inches is cobbly sandy loam. Below this is 12 inches of very stony fine sandy loam. The lower part of the substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very stony loamy sand. Permeability is moderately rapid in the Tridell soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is high. This unit is used as rangeland or for firewood production. The potential plant community on the Morval soil is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Tridell soil is 62 mainly Utah juniper, pinyon pine, gaileta, biuebunch wheatgrass, and bottlebrush squirreltaii. The potential production of the native understory vegetation in normal years is about 400 pounds of air-dry vegetation per acre. Mechanical treatment is not practical on this unit because of the stony surface and the slope. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. The Tridelt soil is suited to limited production of firewood. The average annual production is 5 cords per acre. The average stocking rate is 150 trees per acre. Special care is needed to minimize erosion when the stands are thinned and when other forest management practices are applied. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are large stones and the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. The Morval soil is in the Deep Loam range site, and the Tridelt soil is in the Pinyon -Juniper woodland site. 8--Moyerson-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 60 per ent slopes. This map unit is on mountainside- and ridge Elevation is 7,500 to 8,500 feet. The aver ge annual •recipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual a temperature is 40 to 42 degrees F . nd the average fr• t -free period is 75 to 85 days. This unit about 60 percent Moyerson ilty clay loam and 25 p rcent shale Rock outcro- . The Moyerson soil is 'n the less steeply ski, ng areas, and the Rock outcrop in the steeper • •sitions on the landscape. Included in this uni -re sm• areas of soils that are similar to the Moyerson -oil • t have channery fragments covering 20 to '• percent of the surface. Included areas make up :• ,ut 15 percent of the total acreage. The Moyerson s. is shallo and well drained. It formed in alluviu • and colluviu •erived dominantly from shale and .andstone. About to 15 percent of the surface is cov red with channery fra meats. Typically, the surface =yer is grayish brown silt lay loam about 5 inches t ck. The upper 5 inches of th= substratum is silty clay oam. The lower part to a depth • 16 inches is clay. ale bedrock is at a depth of 10 to inches. P meability is slow in the Moyerson soil. ailable r capacity is very low. The effective rootin• .epth is 1'0 to 20 inches. Runoff is medium, and the haza of ater erosion is high. Soil Survey Rock outcrop is weathered to a depth of . to 1 inches i •laces. This uni used as rangeland or as wil• ' e habitat The potential • ant community is mainly - ah juniper, pinyon pine, Uta serviceberry, true mountainmahogan , ndian ricegra •, and western wheatgrass. The pote al produ on of the native understory vegetation in .rmyears is about 300 pounds of air-dry vegetatio •er acre. The slope limits acces •y estock. The limited accessibility results in ergrazi • of the Tess sloping areas. Suitable ma : gement pract es include proper range use, deferrr: grazing, and rot- 'on grazing. This unit is v ry poorly suited to ho -site developmen he main limitations are th depth to shale be. '.ck, the shrink -swell potential, a ry low loads porting capacity, the slow permeabili and slop is map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Pinyon -Juniper woodland sit 89—Mussel loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes. This we drained soil is on terraces and foot slopes. It form••d in alluvium. Elevation is 6,500 to 7,500 f avera• • annual precipitation is 13 to 14 inches, he averag • • nnual air temperature is 42 to 44 de ; roes F and the - erage frost -free period is 75 to 90 : ays. Typical] the surface layer is light gray I am about inches thick. The upper 34 inches of the bstratum i sandy clay to The lower part to a de• of 60 inc is gravelly sanclay loam. Included in thi unit are small area- of Yamo soils. Included areas m- e up about 10 p: cent of the total t. acreage. Permeability is m water capacity is high. inches or more. Runoff erosion is slight. This unit is used as ha development. If it is use limitation is low fertility if adequate fertilizer unit can produce 4 nnually erat Th a The suitabili of this unit for ran • seeding is goof The potentia slant community is mai ly western wheatgras , needleandthread, Nevada •luegrass, Sandber. •luegrass, and big sagebrush. The averag4 annual ,,roduction of air-dry vegetation is bout 800 poun • - per acre. Tr s unit is well suited to homesite develo • ment. is map unit is in capability subclass IVe, igate d nonirrigated. It is in the Rolling Loam range -ite. e in th e eff slo G us ons o Mussel soil. Availa tive rooting depth is , and the hazard of watt nd or for homesite as ayland, the main rass: and legumes grow w ed. If • operly managed, the f irrigatt grass hay per acr, ,tonines toper range axing. Aerial spr management. IThis unit is poorly suit he main limitation Dedrock. Th ap unit is in capability subclass V nirrigated. It is in the Rocky Loam range site. 94--Showalter-Morval complex, 5 to 15 percent lopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces, d valley sides. Elevation is 7,000 to 8,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the verage annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, nd the average frost -free period is 80 to 90 days. This unit is about 45 percent Showalter very stony oam and 35 percent Morval loam. The Showalter soil is n convex areas, and the Morval soil is in the more oncave areas. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Morval soil but have a thicker surface ayer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Morval soil but have 30 to 40 percent obbles in the substratum. Included areas make up Ica bout 20 percent of the total acreage. The Showalter soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. 'About 10 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with stones, 5 percent with cobbles, and 5 percent with gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown very stony loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the Isubsoil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches is very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is very cobbly clay loam. 'Permeability is slow in the Showalter soil. Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard I of water erosion is slight. The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Typically, the Usurface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 Iinches and calcareous below that depth. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting Idepth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used as hayland or rangeland, for crops, or for homesite development. It is moderately suited to I hay and crops. The main limitations are the surface stoniness. the slope, and the slow permeability. Soil Survey uitable management practices includ deferred grazing, and ro - •n g is suitable for • i sh mesite development. d the depth to e the slope 1 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. Limiting tillage for seedbed preparation and controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. If properly managed, the unit can produce 3 tons of irrigated grass hay or 60 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on the Showalter soil is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, prairie junegrass, Indian ricegrass, true mountainmahogany, antelope bitterbrush, Saskatoon serviceberry, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Morval soil is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. The main limitation for range seeding or mechanical treatment is the surface stoniness in areas of the Showalter soil, Range seeding generally is restricted to broadcasting because of this limitation. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the stones throughout the profile. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, irrigated and nonirrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loamy Slopes range site, and the Morval soil is in the Deep Loam range site. howalter-Morval complex, 15 to 25 perce slop. . This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terres, and va : sides (fig. 7). Elevation is 7,000 to 8, '0 feet. The . erage annual precipitation is 14 to 6 inches, the erage annual air temperature 42 to 44 degrees F, anthe average frost -free peri.. is 80 to 90 ays. This unit is abo 45 percent Showa er very stony oam and 35 percent orval loam. e Showalter soil is n convex areas, and th Morval .il is in the more oncave areas. Included in this unit are s • .II areas of soils that are milar to the Morval soil b h. e 30 to 50 percent obbles in the substratu . . Includ areas make up out 20 percent of t total acrea The Showalter sr is deep and we drained. It rmed in alluviu ► derived dominantly f 'm basalt. out 10 to 1 •ercent of the surface is c ered with ones, 5 p- ent with cobbles, and 5 perce with avel. T . catty, the surface layer is brown ve stony am a• •ut 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches o he Is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inch is cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 hes or more is very cobbly clay loam. was is 6 of v 1 allu surf upp incl- is lc inch P waft dept hazi TI hom TI is mi prair moui servi prodi acre. Tr main mutts aver 1,50C Th treatr Show props: grazir mana If tl limital slow! legurr Thi devek shrink profile nonirri range range 96— slope: terrace alluviu shale i 6,000 psum Area,. Colorado and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer miting tillage for seedbed preparation and weeds help to control runoff and erosio . If naged, the unit can produce 3 tons hay or 60 bushels of barley per : ore )ant community on the S •waiter soil wheatgrass, wester wheatgrass, Ian ricegrass, tru telope bitterb sh, Saskatoon ebrush. e average annual ation about 900 pounds per gra Hy. potential my bluebun e junegrass, In tainmahogany, berry, and big s on of air-dry veg •tential plant com eedleandthread, rass, prairie ju e annual pro ounds per main limi nt is t alter nity on the Morval soil is es rn wheatgrass, grass, . nd big sagebrush. The ction of ai dry vegetation is about re ion for range se= • ing or mechanical surface stoniness in . reas of the . Range seeding general is restricted to g because of this limitation. nit is poorly suited to homesite d- elopment. n limitations are the shrink -swell pottial and es throughout the profile. ;map unit is in capability subclass Vle, irr sated irrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loa range site, and the Marva) soil is in the Dee nge site. howalter-Morval complex, 15 to 25 percent . This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces, Iley sides (fig. 7). Elevation is 7,000 to 8,500 he average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 s, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 es F, and the average frost -free period is 80 to 90 his unit is about 45 percent Showalter very stony and 35 percent Morval loam. The Showalter sod is nvex areas, and the Morval soil is in the more cave areas. ncluded in this unit are small areas of soils that are ilar to the Morval soil but have 30 to 50 percent bies in the substratum. Included areas make up ut 20 percent of the total acreage. he Showalter soil is deep and well drained. It ed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. ut 10 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with 3„ nes, 5 percent with cobbles, and 5 percent with vel. Typically, the surface layer is brown very stony m about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the soil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches is ry cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 hes or more is very cobbly clay loam. 65 Permeability is slow in the Showalter soil. Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches and calcareous below that depth. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity alsois moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used as rangeland or hayland or for homesite development. The potential plant community on the Showalter soil is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass: prairie junegrass, Indian ricegrass, true mountainmahogany, antelope bitterbrush, Saskatoon serviceberry, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Morval soil is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. The main limitation for range seeding or mechanical treatment is the surface stoniness in areas of the Showalter soil. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. If this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main limitations are the surface stoniness, the slope. and the slow permeability in the Showalter soil. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. This unit is very poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope, the shrink -swell potential, and the stones throughout the profile. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, nonirrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loamy Slopes range site, and the Morval soil is in the Deep Loam range site. uthace cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 6 percen well drained soil is on u nd alluv slopes. This terraces. mountains alluvium derived dominant) shale intermixed w 6,000 to 7 s. It formed in redbed sandstone and I. Elevation is ation is psiferous m eet. The average annual pr m Area, Colorado hat characterize this site are prairie uttongrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, - d berry. The average annual produ• ion of tion is about 900 pounds per acr-. If the on deteriorates, mountain big s..:ebrush, itbrush, cheatgrass, and annu- weeds undance. agement improves deteriored areas of roducing more woody rubs than were tential plant commu ' y. in areas oved by prescribed burning or by ical methods, e hazard of erosion e is r r mech se. na soil is Rations are 'The effects of y maintaining a foundation. - at has a low effects of ed to pro e bedr al si rm a sed for - omesite development, he s •pe and the shrink -swell r: king and swelling can be nstant moisture content c 'lling excavations with hrink well potential can also rinking : rid swelling. The deep e essentia level building sites . Septic tank - •sorption fields of do not function as -quately because of ability. Other kinds of ewage disposal e needed. The effluent om septic tank elds can surface in downslo,'e areas and a health hazard. nelli soil is used for homesite de - lopment, itation is the slope. The slope is : Iso a nt concern if septic tank absorption ields are bsorption lines should be installed on he ccess roads should be designed to con of noff and help stabilize cut slopes. p unit is in capability subclass Vle, d. It is in the Clayey Foothills range site. orrlorthents-Camborthids-Rock outcrop 6 to 65 percent slopes. This map unit is on ty sloping to steep, mainly south -facing ides, hills, ridges, and foot slopes. It is on de slopes throughout the survey area, y where major drainageways cut deep it is about 45 percent Torriorthents, 20 amborthids, and 15 percent Rock outcrop. d in this unit are small areas of Monad, Iyers, Brownsto, Cushool, Dollard, Ansari, and Almy uded areas make up about 20 percent of the age. rriorthents are shallow or moderately deep ell drained. They formed in residuum and derived dominantly from sedimentary rock. is generally covered with stones. The er ranges from reddish brown to brown. The 71 soils range from fine sandy loam to clay loam and have a variable content of gravel, cobbles, and stones. The depth to shale or sandstone is 4 to 30 inches. Permeability is moderate in the Torriorthents. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 4 to 30 inches. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is severe. The Camborthids are shallow to deep and are well drained. They formed in residuum and colluvium derived dominantly from sandstone shale and basalt. Typically, these soils have a light colored surface layer and are clay loam or loam. They are generally free of stones throughout the profile, but scattered basalt stones, cobbles, and sandstone rock fragments are on the surface. The content of clay in the subsoil increases slightly with depth. Permeability is moderate in the Camborthids. Available water capacity is low or moderate. The effective rooting depth is 15 to 60 inches. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is severe. The Rock outcrop consists mainly of barren sandstone, shale, and basalt. This unit is used as wildlife habitat. The native vegetation is a rather sparse stand of grasses, (orbs. pinyon, and Utah juniper. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope, the depth to bedrock, and large stones. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. No range site is assigned. 05—Torriorthents-Rock outcrop complex, 45 95 p. cent slopes. This map unit is on steep or extrema steep, mainly south -facing mountain es, hills, an• dges. It occurs throughout the sur ey area, particularly ' ere major drainageways cu •eep canyons. This unit is ab• t 45 percent Torri' hents and 35 percent Rock outcr Included in this unit re sma areas of Monad, Iyers, Earsman, Brownsto, Cus •o and Almy soils. Included areas make up about 20 • ent of the total acreage. The Torriorthents are hallo or moderately deep and are well drained. ' ey form- • in residuum and colluvium derived d. inantly from ndstone, shale, and basalt. The rface is generally 'vered with stones. The s ace layer is reddish bro n. The soils range from amy to clayey and have a va 'able content of gravel obbles, and stones. Per ' -ability is moderate in the Torriorthent Avail. • le water capacity is low. The effective roo de. is 4 to 40 inches. Runoff is rapid, and the ha rd ater erosion is severe. 72 ock outcrop consists mainly of barr sandstone, - - le, and basalt. This unit is us=. -s wildlife ha •' The native vegetation is grasses, • = yon, and Utah juniper. This unit is poorly sui - • to esite development. The main limitatio : e the slope, •epth to bedrock, an. ge stones. This -p unit is in capability class VIII. No ra : - site is igned. 106—Tridell-Brownsto stony sandy foams, 12 to 50 percent slopes, extremely stony. This map unit is on terraces and mountainsides. Elevation is 6,400 to 7,700 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 105 days. This unit is about 45 percent Tridell soil and 35 percent Brownsto soil. About 5 to 10 percent of the surface is covered with stones. Included in this unit are small areas of Forelle and Evanston soils in the less sloping cleared areas. Also included are small areas of basalt Rock outcrop and soils that are similar to the Tridell soil but have less gravel and fewer stones. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Tridell soil is deep and somewhat excessively drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from sandstone and basalt. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is grayish brown stony sandy loam about 2 inches thick. The lower part is grayish brown very cobbly fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the substratum is very cobbly fine sandy loam. The next part is cobbly sandy loam about 11 inches thick. Below this is 12 inches of very stony fine sandy loam. The lower part of the substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very stony loamy sand. Hard basalt is commonly below a depth of about 60 inches. The soil is calcareous throughout. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Permeability is moderately rapid in the Tridell soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Brownsto soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from coarse textured, calcareous sandstone and basalt. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is light brownish gray stony sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The lower part is light brownish gray stony sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 19 inches of the substratum is very gravelly sandy loam. The next 12 inches is very gravelly loamy sand. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is gravelly Soil Survey sandy loam. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Permeability is moderate in the Brownsto soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used mainly for livestock grazing or wildlife habitat. It also is used for limited homesite development, for Christmas trees, or as a source of firewood and posts. The potential plant community on the Tridell soil is mainly pinyon pine and Utah juniper with an understory of bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, Wyoming big sagebrush, and muttongrass. Other plants that characterize this site are bottlebrush squirreltail, antelope bitterbrush, and true mountainmahogany. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is abot 300 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Brownsto soil mainly Wyoming big sagebrush, needleandthread, Indian ricegrass, western wheatgrass, and scattered pinyon pine and Utah juniper. Other plants that characterize this site are bottlebrush squirreltail, antelope bitterbrush, and true mountainmahogany. ThE average annual production of native understory vegetation is about 600 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. Mechanical treatment is not practical because of the very stony surface and the slope. Suitable management practices include proper grazing use and a planned grazing system. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. Selective thinnir of the pinyon and juniper stands improves the quality ( the understory for grazing and provides firewood, post and Christmas trees. The Tridell soil is suited to limited production of pinyon pine and Utah juniper. The average annual production is 5 cords per acre. The average stocking rate is 150 trees per acre. To ensure sustained yields and continued use, the kind of wood production shout( be considered before the stands are thinned or cleare Special care is needed to minimize erosion when the stands are thinned or cleared. Thinning the stands generally promotes the growth of understory grasses and young trees. Only the less sloping areas of this unit are suited tc homesite development. The main limitations are the slope and the stoniness. Erosion is a hazard in the steeper areas. Only the part of the site that is used fo construction should be disturbed. Topsoil can be stockpiled and used to reclaim areas disturbed during ypsum Area, Colorado ction, The gravel and cobbles in disturbed areas be removed if the site is landscaped, particularly used for lawns. Areas adjacent to hillsides are anally affected by runoff, which may be pealed by the movement of rock debris. on growth has resulted in increased ction of homes in areas of this unit. map unit is in capability subclass Vile, ated. The Trideii soil is in the Pinyon -Juniper nd site, and the Brownsto soil is in the Stony lis range site. Uracca, moist-Mergel complex, 1 to 6 percen extremely stony. This map unit is on alluvial hes, and valley side slopes. Elevation is 400 feet. The average annual precipita is es, the average annual air tempera re is es F, and the average frost -free eriod is ut 50 percent Uracca soil •nd 40 nt Mergel soi uded in this u t to the Uracca r surface layer a vents. Included are tal acreage. Uracca soil is deep Um derived dominant' morphic material. About ate is covered with boul Typically, the surfa loam about 3 inch bsoil is cobbiy sa cobbiy sandy cia inches or more content of coar dent, by volum subsoil. `ermeability • Linable wate "th is 60 i rd of w The Mer aI ou vered rca m are small areas nd Merge' soils d a lower con s make up o oils that are t have a nt of coarse bout 10 percent of nd -II drained. It formed in fro mixed igneous and to 15 percent of the s, stones, cobbles, and la er is brown cobbly thick. The upper 5 inches of y loam. he lower 7 inches is oam. The sbstratum to a depth s extremely co •ly loamy sand. e fragments rang from 35 to 85 , in a major part of t - surface layer moderately rapid in the racca soil. capacity is low. The effecti - rooting hes or more. Runoff is slow, - d the er erosion is slight. el soil is deep and well drained. It ormed in ash. About 3 to 30 percent of the s ace is ith boulders, stones, cobbles, and gra • I , the surface layer is grayish brown cobbi out 8 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of e atum is very cobbiy sandy loam. The lower pa to pth of 60 inches is extremely stony sandy loam. content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 80 cent, by volume. ermeability is moderate in the Merge' soil. Available ter capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 73 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water rasion is slight. This unit is used mainly for irrigated hay and pastur It =Iso is used for homesite development or rock qu. rying. If his unit is used for hay and pasture, the main limita on is the low available water capacity. Fre + ` ent irrigatin is needed. Applications of nitrogen an phosph, rus fertilizer improve the growth of for. .e plants. P per stocking rates, pasture rotatio : and restricted razing during wet periods help to, eep the pasture in . •od condition and protect the ,+ii from erosion. Irrig :tion water can be applied b : corrugation, sprinkler, andlooding methods. Pipe, di h lining, or drop structures`'n irrigation ditches facia ate irrigation and reduce the azard of ditch erosio ', If properly managed, the uni can produce 4 ton:. of irrigated grass hay per acre annu Ily. If this unit is use for homesite . -velopment, the main limitations are tle large sto s and boulders on and below the surfaced Populati• growth has resulted in increased constructiof ho es in areas of this unit. Preserving the existing • ant c?ver during construction helps to control erosion. he •ravel and cobbles in disturbed areas should be oved if the site is landscaped, particularly in eas used for lawns. The effluent from septic tank srption fields can surface in downslope areas and th crate a health hazard. If the density of housing is m erate'or high, community sewage systems are n eded to revent the contamination of wat supplies suiting from seepage from onsite sewage isposal syst-` s. Areas adjacent to hillsides are occasi nally affected • runoff, which may be accompanied bthe movement 0 rock debris. This map unit in capability subcl. ss Vls, irrigated and nonirrigated: It is in the Stony Loa'. range site. 108—Urac ' =, moist-Mergel complex, 6 to 12 percent slo• `s, extremely stony. This m. • unit is on alluvial fans .nd valley side slopes. Elevati., is 6,800 to 8,400 fe •t. The average annual precipitati:vn is 16 to 19 inches the average annual air temperatur:, is 40 to 43 degr- -s F, and the average frost -free perio', is 75 to 95 day This nit is about 50 percent Uracca soil and perce t Mergel soil. In uded in this unit are small areas of soils that . re sim ar to the Uracca and Mergel soils but have a er surface layer and a lower content of coarse gments. Included areas make up about 10 percent e total acreage. The Uracca soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from mixed igneous and hi fr 191 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (Some termsgthat "moderate," and Abfsenceeofare an entrydefined indicatesGlossary. theetsoiiml wastnas othrt ated. Theonsite fominethis ne information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does n investigation) Soil name and map symbol Shallow I excavations I Moderate: too clayey. Severe: slope. Moderate: too clayey. Moderate: too clayey, slope. Severe: slope. Slight Dwellings without basements Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Dwellings with basements Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Moderate: shrink -swell. Moderate: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Slight Small commercial buildings Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Local roads and streets Severe: low strength, shrink -swell. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: low strength, shrink -swell. Severe: low strength, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, large stones. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Lawns and landscaping Moderate: large stones. Severe: slope. Slight. Severe: slope, large stones. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: large stone slope. Severe: large stone slope. Severe: slope, thin layer 1 192 1 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Soil Survey As 1 Soil name and map symbol Shallow excavations Dwellings without basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Local roads and streets Lawns and landscaping 1*: Rock outcrop. I*. tencio 1zeltine 111*: : allings 11Yeljack 115*, 16*: Charcol 'Mord 7*: Cochetopa IlAntrobus Severe: cutbanks cave. 018*, 19*: Cochetopa Antrobus 1120 1 Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Coulterg '21 * : Curecanti 1 Fughes 1 Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: too clayey, slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: cutbanks cave. Moderate: too clayey, slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: large stones. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope, large stones. Slight Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope. Moderate: slope, large stones. Moderate: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Slight Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: low strength, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: low strength, shrink -swell. Severe: large stones. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Moderate: droughty. Moderate: slope, frost action, large stones. Moderate: small stones, droughty. Severe: shrink -swell, low strength. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Slight. Moderate: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Moderate: large stones, slope. 22* Cu Fu 23, Ct 25' C+ R 2( 194 Soil Survey Soil name and TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued 1 1 1 Shallow 1 Dwellings excavations 1 without 1 basements map symbol 1 1 Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Local roads and streets Lawns and landscaping 34 Empedrado 35 Empedrado 36 Empedrado 37 Etoe 38 Evanston 39, 90, 41 Evanston 42* Fluvaquents 43*: Forelle Brownsto 44*: Forelle Brownsto 95 Forsey 46, 47 Forsey 98 Fughes 99 Slight Moderate: slope. Goslin 50 Severe: slope. Goslin Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: cutbanks cave, wetness. Moderate: slope. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: slope. Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Moderate: large stones. Severe: slope. Moderate: too clayey. Slight Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness. Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Slight Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness. Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Slight Severe: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: frost action. Moderate: slope, frost action. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: wetness, flooding, frost action. Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: frost action, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell, low strength. Slight Moderate: large stones Moderate: large stones slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight. Severe: slope. Severe: wetness. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones, slope. Moderate: small stones, droughty, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones, slope. Moderate: large stones. Slight. Severe: slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 51 1 Soil name and map symbol Gothic 52, 53 ------------ Gothic 54 Grotte 55*: Gypsum land. Gypsiorthids 56 1 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Shallow 1 excavations 1 1 Moderate: too clayey. Ipson 57 Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Ipson 58 Irrawaddy Severe: depth to rock, slope. 59, 60, 61, 62---- Iyers 63, 64 Jerry 65*: 1 Moderate: slope. Jerry Millerlake 66*, 67*: Jerry Severe: slope. Dwellings without basements Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Millerlake 68 Moderate: too clayey. Slight Jodero Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Dwellings with basements Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: slope, shrink -swell. Moderate: shrink -swell. See footnote at end of table. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: depth to slope. small commercial buildings Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. rock, Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Local roads and streets Severe: low strength, shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope, frost action. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Slight --------- Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. 195 Lawns and landscaping Slight. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: low strength, slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, thin layer. Severe: low strength, shrink -swell. Moderate: large stones, slope. Moderate: shrink -swell, low strength. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight. Slight. Severe: Severe: low strength, slope. slope, shrink -swell. Severe: Severe: slope. slope. Moderate: frost action. Slight. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 196 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Soil Survey Soil name and map symbol Shallow excavations Dwellings without basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Local roads and streets Lawns and landscaping 69 Kilgore 1 ' 70 Kobar 71 Kobar 72 Kobar 73 Kobar 74 Leavittvi1le 75 Millerlake 76, 77 Mine 78 Miracle 79 Moen 80 Moen 81 Moen 82, 83 Monad 84 Morval II 85, 86 Morval 87*: Morval 1 Severe: cutbanks cave, wetness. Moderate: too clayey. Moderate: too clayey, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: too clayey, slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: flooding, wetness. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: shrink -swell. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell, depth to rock. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: 'shrink -swell. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: Moderate: flooding. I wetness, I flooding. Severe: 'Slight. shrink -swell, 1 low strength. 1 Severe: shrink -swell, low strength. Severe: shrink -swell, low strength, slope. Severe: shrink -swell, low strength. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: depth to rock, low strength. Moderate: depth to rock, low strength, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: low strength, frost action. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: small stones, thin layer. Moderate: small stones, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight. Severe: slope. 1Severe: I slope. 1 1 l• Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued 1 1 I Dwellings I without I basements (Severe: sllope Se. 1 slope. ope. Severe: Severe: 'Severe: shrink -swell, depth to rock,! shrink -swell, slope, I slope. slope. shrink -swell. I Soil name and I Shallow excavations map symbol 87*: Tridell 88*: Moyerson Rock outcrop. 89 Mussel 90 Mussel 91 Mussel 92 Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Redrob 93 Severe: depth to rock, slope. Rogert 94*: Showalter 1 1 1 1 1 Morval Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. 95*: Showalter Morval Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Severe: cutbanks cave, wetness. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. 96 Southace 97 Moderate: too clayey, large stones, slope. Moderate: slope. Southace 98, 99 Southace Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Moderate: large stones. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope, large stones. See footnote at end of table. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Severe: flooding, wetness. Moderate: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock,' slope. Moderate: ISevere: slope, I slope. large stones. I ISevere: 1 slope. ISevere: I slope. ISevere: I slope. IModerate: I large stones. ISevere: I slope. ISevere: 1 slope. 'Slight !Severe: I slope. ISevere: I slope. 1Severe: I flooding. ISevere: slope, depth to Moderate: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Moderate: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. I Local roads I and streets ISevere: I slope. !Severe: I low strength, I slope, I shrink -swell. IModerate: I frost action. (Moderate: I slope, 1 frost action. !Severe: I slope. !Moderate: I wetness, I flooding. I I ISevere: (Severe: I depth to rock,! small stones, rock.' slope. I slope. 197 Lawns and landscaping 'Severe: I slope. (Severe: I slope, I thin layer. 'Slight. !Moderate: I slope. ISevere: I slope. IModerate: 1 wetness. I I 'Moderate: ISevere: I slope, I large stones. I frost action, I I shrink -swell. I I I 'Moderate: IModerate: I low strength, I slope. I slope, I I frost action. I I !Severe: ISevere: I slope. I large stones I I slope. I I ISevere: ISevere: 1 slope. I slope. I I IModerate: ISevere: I large stones. I droughty. IModerate: I slope, I large stones. ISevere: 1 slope. ISevere: I droughty. ISevere: I droughty, I slope. 1 1198 1 e Soil name and map symbol Starlet' Starman I 101*: Tanna IPinelli ' 1 Tanna 1 Pinelli II 103*: Tanna 1 1 1 1 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Shallow excavations Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Pinelli Moderate: depth to rock, too clayey. Moderate: too clayey. Moderate: depth to rock, too clayey, slope. 104*: Torriorthents---- Camborthids Moderate: too clayey, slope. Rock outcrop. Severe: slope. 105*: Torriorthents---- 1 1 Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Severe: slope. Dwellings without basements Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: shrink -swell. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: shrink -swell. Moderate: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. See footnote at end of table. Dwellings with basements Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: shrink -swell. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Variable Moderate: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Small commercial buildings Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: shrink -swell. Moderate: shrink -swell. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: shrink -swell, slope. Severe: slope. Local roads and streets Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: shrink -swell, low strength. Moderate: shrink -swell, low strength. Severe: shrink -swell, low strength. Moderate: shrink -swell, low strength, slope. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Variable ------- Severe: shrink -swell, low strength, slope. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Soil Survey Lawns and landscaping Severe: small stones, depth to rock. Severe: small stones, depth to rock. Moderate: depth to rock. Slight. Moderate: slope, depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Variable. Severe: slope, depth to rock. Severe: slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado Soil name and map symbol 106*: Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel 108*: Uracca Mergel 109*, 110*: Uracca Mergel 111 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued 1 1 I Small 1 Dwellings I commercial I basements I withoutI buildings 1 I 1 I Severe: /Severe: Severe: slope. cutbanks cave, slope. slope. Shallow excavations I Dwellings with I basements (Severe: slope. Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones. Severe: large stones. Vandamore 112 Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones. Woodhall 113 Severe: large stones. Woos ley 119 Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones, slope. Yamo 115 Severe: large stones, slope. Yamo 116 Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Yamo Yel jack Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, large stones, slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight I Local roads I and streets )Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. 199 I Lawns and I landscaping 1Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, Large stones. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: large stones, droughty. Moderate: large stones, droughty. Severe: large stones, droughty. Moderate: large stones, droughty, slope. Severe: large stones, droughty, slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: low strength, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES (Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "good," and other terms. Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated. The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation) Soil name and map symbol 1 Acree 2 Acree 3 1 Septic tank 1 absorption 1 fields Acree 4 Acree 5 Acree 6 Almy Almy 6*, 9*: Ansel Anvik Sewage lagoon areas Trench 1 Area sanitary I sanitary landfill 1 landfill Daily cover for landfill Severe: percs slowly. 10*, 11*: Anvik Severe: percs slowly, slope. Severe: percs slowly. Skylick Sligting 12*: Arle Severe: percs slowly. Severe: percs slowly, slope. Moderate: percs slowly. Severe: slope. Severe: percs slowly, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: percs slowly, slope. Severe: percs slowly, slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope, large stones. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope, large stones. Severe: too clayey. Severe: slope, too clayey. Severe: too clayey. Severe: too clayey. Severe: slope, too clayey. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, too clayey, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope, large stones. Slight Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Poor: too clayey. Poor: too clayey, slope. Poor: too clayey. Poor: too clayey. Poor: too clayey, slope. Good. Poor: slope. Poor: slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: too clayey, large stones, slope. Poor: area reclaim, large stones, slope. 201 1 202 Soil Survey 1 TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued II I I I I Septic tank I Sewage lagoon Trench I Area I Daily cover Soilmname and I P areas sanitary I sanitary I for landfill absorption I map symbol I P I I fields I landfill I I landfill I I I I I I I I I 12*: 1 1 1 1 IISevere: Severe:IISevere: IPoor: IAnsari Severe:depth area I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I depth to rock, slope.to rock, largezeclaim, stones I slope. I slope. 1slope.I I slope. I I I I I I I I Rock outcrop. I I 1 I 1 I I I I 13*: I 1 11 Atencio ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: IPoor: II I poor filter. I seepage. I seepage, I too sandy. seepage. 1 seepage, I I I too sandy, 1 I 1 1 I small stones. 1 1 1 I Severe: ISevere: ISevere: IPoor: Azeltine ISevere: I I seepage. 1 seepage, I I poor filter. 1 seepage. I seepage, I too sandy, I too sandy. I I small stones. I II I 1 1 I 14*: I I I I Severe: Poor: Callings ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: I slope. I large stones, percs slowly, 1 slope. I slope, I P I slope. I slope. 1 1 large stones. 1 I 1 1 I j IPoor I Yel ack ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: Severe: : I slope. I slope. I percs slowly, 1 slope. 1 slope. i p I slope. 1 1 I I 15*, 16*: I ' Severe: ISevere: Poor: Charcol ISevere: ISevere: I I small stones, I slope. I seepage, I slope, I seepage, I slope. 1 large stones. 1 slope. 1 slope. 1 I II Severe: Severe: Poor: Mord ISevere: Severe:II I seepage, I too clayey, I percs slowly, I seepage, I slope, I slope. I slope. I too clayey.I slope. I hard to pack, small stones. II I I 1 I 1Cocheto a ISevere: ISevere: I Severe: I Moderate: Poor:, too clayey. I slope. 1 too clayey, I percs slowly. I slope• i y y' I I hard to pack, I I 1 I I IIismal l stones. Poor: nrobus Severe: Severe: Severe: Moderate: large stones. slope, large stones. slope. large stones. I large stones. 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I ik 18*, 19*: I I re: Poor:I Cochetopa ISevere: Severe:IISevere: 1 Severe: : eI too clayey, I percs slowly, I slope. I slope, I p I hard to pack, IIslope. I I too clayey. I I small stones. I I 1 1 e I 1 I I Severe: ISevere: ISevere: IPoor: Antrobus ISevere: I I slope, I slope. I large stones, II slope, I large, 1 slope. I large stones. I large stones. i large stones. i 1 1Severe: 'Poor: 20 ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. 1 slope. I Coulterg I I I I See footnote at end of table. 204 Soil Survey TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Soil name and map symbol Septic tank absorption fields Sewage lagoon areas Trench sanitary landfill Area 1 Daily cover sanitary 1 for landfill landfill 1 29*, 30*: Rock outcrop. 31 Dotsero 32 Dot sero 33*: Earsman Rock outcrop. 34 Empedrado Empedrado 36 Empedrado 37 Etoe 38 Evanston 39, 40, 41 Evanston 42* Fluvaquents 43*: Forelle Brownsto 44*: Forelle Brownsto Severe: slope. Slight Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: percs slowly. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness, poor filter. Moderate: peres slowly, slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, flooding. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, seepage, wetness. Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope, too sandy. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Slight Poor: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, seepage, wetness. Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Fair: small stones. Poor: area reclaim, small stones, slope. Fair: small stones. Fair: small stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Good. Poor: slope. Poor: seepage, too sandy, small stones. Fair: slope. Poor: small stones. Poor: slope. Poor: small stones, slope. 1 1 1 1 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado Soil name and map symbol 45 11 Forsey 46, 47 Forsey 1 4 48 Fughes 9 Goslin I50 � Goslin 1 1 51 TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Septic tank absorption fields Moderate: peres slowly, large stones. Gothic 52, 53 Severe: slope. Gothic 54 Severe: peres slowly. Grotte 55*: Gypsum land. Gypsiorthids 56 Slight Severe: slope. Severe: peres slowly. 51 Severe: peres slowly, slope. Ipson 58 Severe: peres slowly, slope. Irrawaddy 59, 60, 61, 62 Iyers 63, 64 Jerry Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: peres slowly, slope. Severe: slope. Sewage lagoon areas Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, peres slowly, slope. Severe: percs slowly, slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, slope. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Trench sanitary landfill Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: too clayey. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: too clayey. Severe: slope, too clayey. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Area sanitary landfill 205 Daily cover for landfill Slight----------- Poor: small stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope, too clayey. Severe: slope, too clayey. Slight Slight Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Poor: small stones, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Poor: too clayey. Fair: small stones. Poor: slope. Poor: too clayey, hard to pack. Poor: too clayey, hard to pack, slope. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: area reclaim, slope. Poor: small stones. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: area reclaim, small stones, slope. Poor: area reclaim, too clayey, hard to pack. Poor: too clayey, hard to pack, small stones. 1 seen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 80 Soil name and map symbol Moen 81 Moen 82, 83 Monad 84 Morval 85, 86 Morval 87*: Morval Tridell TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Septic tank absorption fields Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. 88*: Moyerson Severe: percs slowly, slope. Moderate: peres slowly. Rock outcrop. 89 Severe: slope. Mussel 90 Severe: slope. Severe: poor filter, slope. Mussel 91 Mussel 92- Severe: depth to rock, slope. Redrob 93 Moderate: peres slowly. Rogert 94*: Showalter Moderate: peres slowly, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: wetness, poor filter. Sewage lagoon areas Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: peres slowly. See footnote at end of table. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, flooding, wetness. Trench sanitary landfill Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: too clayey. Severe: seepage, depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight Area sanitary landfill Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, wetness, too sandy. Severe: depth to rock, seepage, slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight 207 Daily cover for landfill Poor: area reclaim. Poor: area reclaim, slope. Poor: slope. Fair: too clayey, small stones. Poor: slope. Poor: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, wetness. Severe: depth to rock, seepage, slope. Moderate: slope. Poor: slope. Poor: area reclaim, hard to pack, slope. Good. Fair: slope. Poor: slope. Poor: seepage, too sandy, small stones. poor: depth to rock, seepage, small stones. Poor: small stones. 1 1 208 1 1 Soil name and map symbol iii 94*: Morval 1 95*: Showalter Morval 1 96 Southace 1 97 Southace 98, 99 TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Septic tank absorption fields Moderate: peres slowly, slope. Southace I 100*: Starley 1 Severe: peres slowly, slope. Starman II 101*: Tanna 1 1 1 1 1 1 Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Moderate: slope, large stones. Pinelli 102*: Tanna Severe: slope. Pinelli 103*: Tanna Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, peres slowly. Severe: peres slowly. Severe: depth to rock, percs slowly. Severe: peres slowly. I Sewage lagoon I areas I I Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, peres slowly, slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock. Moderate: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Trench sanitary landfill Moderate: slope, too clayey. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Slight Area sanitary landfill Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock. Moderate: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock. Slight Slight Moderate: slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Daily cover for landfill Fair: too clayey, small stones, slope. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: small stones. Poor: small stones. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: depth to rock, small stones. Poor: depth to rock. Poor: depth to rock. Good. Poor: depth to rock. Fair: slope. Poor: depth to rock, slope. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado Soil name and map symbol TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Septic tank absorption fields 103*: Pinelli-------"ISevere: I peres slowly, --- I I slope. I I I ( (Poor: I ISevere: ISevere: 1 depth to rock, 104*: ISevere: depth to rock, I slope. small stones, 'Severe: depth to rock, I P Torriorthents------ I depth to rock, I I slope. slate. I slope. I slope. 1 I I � I ____(Variable--------- (Variable. I --(Variable----' I (Variable------' I Camborthids- "(Variable ---------I I I ISevere: rock, rock, rock, I slope. I I I I I I (Poor: ISevere: I I slope. slope. I I I (Poor: ISevere: I slope. I small stones, slope. I I I I (Poor: ISevere: 1 seepage, I seepage. 1 large stones. I (Slight----------- Poor: large stones. Sewage lagoon I areas ISevere: I slope. Trench sanitary landfill (Severe: I slope. Area I sanitary I landfill (Severe: I slope. Daily cover for landfill Poor: slope. Rock outcrop. 105*: Torriorthents---'""ISevere: I depth to I slope. 106*: Tridell------------ IS Brownsto ----------- IS 107*: Uracca------------- I Mengel ------------- Rock - "" Rock outcrop. ISevere: I depth to I slope. (Severe: I slope, I large stones. (ISevere: I slope. ISevere: I seepage, I large stones. ISevere: I large stones. ISevere: I seepage. I large stones. ISevere: I large stones. ISevere: I seepage, I slope, I large stones. ISevere: I slope, I large stones. evere: poor filter, slope. 108*: Uracca evere: slope. Severe: poor filter, large stones. ISevere: I large stones. ISevere: I poor filter, I large stones. ISevere: I depth to I slope. ISevere: I seepage, I slope, I large stones. ISevere: I seepage, I slope, I large stones. ISevere: I seepage. I large stones. ISevere: 1 large stones. Mengel ------------- ISevere: I large stones. 109*, 110*: ___-----ISevere: Uzacca--- I poor filter, I slope, I large stones. ISevere: Mezgel-------------I slope. tones I large s See footnote at end of table. • ISevere: I seepage, I slope, I large stones. ISevere: I slope, I large stones. ISevere: I seepage. I slope, I large stones. ISevere: I slope, I large stones. 209 Poor: depth to rock, small stones, slope. ISevere: I seepage. (Moderate: I slope. ISevere: I seepage, I slope. ISevere: I slope. Poor: seepage, large stones. Poor: large stones. Poor: seepage, large stones, slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application Attachment 10 Fire District Petition for inclusion September 2002 IN THE MATTER OF CARBONDALE & RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF GARFIELD PETITION FOR INCLUSION The undersigned, John Sarpa, representing SLC -Laurence, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Petitioners), hereby respectfully petition the Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District ("Fire District"), acting by and through its Board of Directors, for the inclusion of the lands, located in Garfield County as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") in the Fire District. The Petitioners represent to the Fire District that they are the owner of one hundred percent (100%) of the Property and that no other persons of entities own an interest therein. The Petitioners represent that the Property is part of a larger parcel, a portion of which, is currently located within the boundaries of the Fire District. The entire parcel, of which the Property is a part, is described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. That portion of the entire parcel that is currently within the Fire District is described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The Property, which is located outside the District boundaries and is the subject of this petition, is described in Exhibit "A." Figure 1, attached hereto, is a map showing the entire parcel, of which the Property is a part, as well as the District Boundaries that divide the parcel. The Petitioners represent that the Property is not currently within the boundaries of a special district, municipality, or county with the power or ability to provide fire protection. The Petitioners represent that the property is suited for and appropriate to receive the services of the Fire District. The Petitioners hereby request that the Property be included in the Fire District and that an Order be entered into the District Court in and for the County of Garfield, Sate of Colorado, including the Property in the Fire District, and that from and after the entry of such Order, the Property shall be liable for the full ad valorum mil levies from time to time levied by the Fire District and the full applicable specific ownership tax. The Property shall also be liable for its proportionate share of annual operation and maintenance charges and the cost of facilities and the taxes, rates, fees, tolls, charges, assessments certified and levied or assessed therefore. The Property shall also be subject to the Fire District's rules and regulations as validly promulgated and as amended from time to time. The Petitioners request that the Fire District publish notice of the filing of this Petition for Inclusion and the place, time and date of the public meeting of the Board of Directors of the Fire District at which the Petition shall be heard. Any interested persons shall appear at such time and place and show cause in writing why the Petition should not be granted. Accompanying this petition is a deposit for funds in the amount of $5,000.00 which shall be applied by the Board of Directors towards payment of all costs of the inclusion proceedings. Such costs shall include payment of attorney's fees, staff time, filing fees, publication costs, and recording costs incurred by the District. The Petitioners hereby represent and warrant to the 1 1 By: Snowmass Land ompany, LLC, a Delaware limit= • ompany 1 � By: 1 I Board of Directors that such additional monies as are required to pay all costs of the inclusion proceedings will be paid immediately upon demand by the Board of Directors. This Petition is signed and submitted by the Petitioners. day Respectfully submitted this of April, 2002. SLC -Laurence, LLC, a Delaware Limited liability company 1 1 1 n Sarpa, Dire of Development STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF GARFIELD The fore oftrument was acknowledged before me this /C/ d ...�—�t�& of April, 2002, by / g L Qf1 A-1op op - Witness my hand and official s al. My commission expires: 1 - ' 1 Exhibit A Legal Description of Portion of South Laurence Ranch Parcel located outside of Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District (the Property) LOT 5 OF SECTION 1, IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6'h P.M.; E1/2SW1/4 AND LOTS 6 AND 7 OF SECTION 6, IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6Th P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO Exhibit B Legal Description of South Laurence Ranch Parcel LOT 5 OF SECTION 1, IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.; W1/2SE1/4, E1/2SW1/4 AND LOTS 6, 7 AND 8 OF SECTION 6; N1/2NE1/4, SW1/4NE1/4 AND NE1/4NW1/4, ALL IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6111 P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO Exhibit C Legal Description of Portion of the South Laurence Ranch Parcel Located within the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District W1/2SE1/4, AND LOT 8 OF SECTION 6; N1/2NE1/4, SW1/4NE1/4 AND NE1/4NW1/4, ALL IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ranch at Coulter Creek Petition for inclusion 1 TG Malloy Consulting 181 Orchard Lane Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 1 AdIoi iflq 21 4 uvy 2 12 2189-314-00-009 11 ' 10 5 yid/J4 y •.. _ 16—M Fire District Boundary Fire District Boundaries LFire District Boundary interpolated from GIS map prepared by Garfield County GIS department. Boundary is approximate and for JII L Mutation purposes only. Figure l Attachment 11 Outline of Conservation Guidelines Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 DRAFT 3/17/02 LAURENCE RANCH CONSERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES BASED ON THE CONSERVATION PLAN DOG CONTROL • All dogs kenneled or controlled by invisible fence inside building envelop • All dogs leashed outside building envelop • Access to Fisher Creek prohibited during winter LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS • Require plants around residents to be native, or those that don't attract deer and elk, or bears. • Landscape plantings approved by wildlife biologist from approved list • Require plants that are not on approved list to be fenced SEASONAL TRAIL CLOSURES • During winter, close trails along southern boundary in Pinyon- Juniper stands and along eastern edge of property. • Access gate in Fisher Creek area closed in winter. HUNTING • Prohibit hunting or target practice on property SNOWMOBILES • All snowmobiles must be 4 -cycle engines • Prohibit access into Fisher Creek and BLM areas designated as critical deer and elk habitat • Prohibit snowmobiles along southern edge and eastern side of property • Allow snowmobiles in hay meadows AGRICULTURAL USE • Horse grazing and trails to be determined • Prevent cattle grazing CAT CONTROL • If a resident has a cat, cannot have a birdfeeder • Prohibit cats at Ranch Compound and Barn MOWING OF HAY FIELDS • Delay during nesting season SITE DESIGN • Excavation shall minimize the removal of native trees and shrubs • Protect habitat for Harrington Penstemon • Protect conservation values during construction through weed management, reseeding, erosion control, trash containment and dog control RANCH COMPOUND • Emphasize improving the area around the Ranch Compound for wildlife, especially birds, through a variety of enhancement projects. These projects would include ponds, native plantings, bird feeders, weed control, and fence removal. FENCING • Wire and Log Fencing must comply with CDOW specifications • Mesh wire fencing is prohibited throughout the property • Old ranch fencing not meeting CDOW specifications shall be removed • Fencing along the access and subdivision roads, and driveways is prohibited Prepared by Dawn Keating Attachment 12 Outline of Architectural Guidelines Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 Laurence Ranch Architectural Design Guidelines Draft 4/23/02 Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Purpose 2. Historical Background and Appropriate Models A. Vision for Development B. Examples 3. Construction Regulations A. Design Review Board Approvals B. Construction Site Requirements 4. Site Evaluation A. Building Siting/Envelopes B. Preservation of Existing Vegetation C. Grading and Drainage D. Site Utilities E. Parking, Service and Storage Areas F. Driveways 5. Landscaping A. Retaining Walls/Fences B. Lighting C. Vegetation D. Landscaping & Plantings E. Satellite Dish Approval 6. Architectural Guidelines A. Measuring Floor Area B. Building Form C. Building Mass and Scale D. Building Height E. Building Materials, Details and Colors F. Chimneys and Flues 7. Guidelines for Sustainable "Green" Architecture A. Energy Conservation Suggestions B. Building Orientation for Sun and Wind C. Building Insulation and Thermal Mass D. Roof and Wall Construction E. Windows F. Environmentally Sensitive Products G. Energy Savings Products H. Recycling Laurence Ranch Architectural Design Guidelines Draft 4/23/02 7. Guidelines for Sustainable "Green" Architecture A. Energy Conservation Suggestions - Laurence Ranch is located in a high - mountain, semi -arid area, at an elevation of approximately 7,000 feet. Temperatures are cold in the winter and cool during summer evenings. There is a high temperature variation between daytime and nighttime. Temperatures will range from the 40's F to 80's F in the summer and —10's F to 40's F in the winter. Heating is required a majority of the months during the year. Cooling needs can be met with appropriate design, thermal mass and natural ventilation. The following are the basic design assets and liabilities for this climate: 1. Temperature is a liability when it's too cold for comfort. Heat loss and air infiltration need to be controlled. 2. Sun is an asset when it's too cold for comfort. A high percentage of sunshine is available. Every opportunity should be used to collect and store the sun's energy for nighttime use. 3. Wind is a liability when it's too cold for comfort. It is important to buffer buildings from the wind, control wind with vegetation and site features, and limit air infiltration. 4. Day to night temperature swings are an asset. Storing heat from daytime gains for nighttime use is important. Thermal masses are required for storage. These same thermal masses can be used to store nighttime cold for cooling during the day in the summer time. B. Building Orientation for Sun and Wind - Based on the climatic consideration given above it is important to orient building for solar gain, while designing the overhangs for protection from potential summer overheating. It is also important that entries provide protection from the wind. Entry areas, such as double lock entries, act as buffers to limit air exchanges and drafts when exterior doors are opened. C. Building Insulation and Thermal Mass - It is important that buildings be well insulated to retain internal comfort. Code requirements are a minimum and additional insulation is recommended and cost effective. Thermal mass is critical to the thermal performance of a building. It is required to absorb the daytime solar gain and radiate the heat gain for nighttime warmth. Without adequate thermal mass the daytime solar gain will overheat the space. Also, the space will be colder in the evening, requiring more heat from the mechanical system. Thermal mass lessens the internal temperature swings; therefore, providing better human comfort. D. Roof and Wall Construction — Exterior wall and roof construction should be well insulated, preferably above code requirements, and provide a barrier for air infiltration. Exterior wall surfaces should be permeable to allow moisture in the wall to escape. Interior surfaces should be less permeable allowing interior moisture that enters the wall to escape through the exterior wall and not be driven back into the interior or to remain in the wall. E. Windows — Use the best quality window you can afford. Windows can be the largest source of heat loss. Therefore, windows with higher thermal insulting values are the best. Conductivity of the window frame is also an important factor. The best windows will have a rating with a low value. Do not use steel or aluminum widows without a thermal break built into the frame. Metal frames can create condensation on the interior under certain conditions. F. Environmentally Sensitive Products — Indoor air quality is important to human health. Products used for the construction and furnishing of a building should contain no or low VOC's. No CFC's should be used in the manufacturing of materials or operation of mechanical equipment. If possible, avoid the use of HCFC's that are being phased out. Formaldehydes should be avoided in products, in the product manufacturing process, and as a binder or adhesive. G. Energy Saving Products — Energy Star Rated appliances should be used to save energy. Toilets should be 1.6 -gallon low flush models. Low flow showerheads should be used. Compact fluorescent lighting should be used where possible for energy savings. H. Recycling — A construction waste management plan should be instigated during the construction of each building to recycle construction waste. Items to be considered for recycling should include: land clearing debris, clean dimensional wood, pallet wood, plywood, OSB, particleboard, concrete masonry units, cardboard, paper, metals, gypsum wallboard, paint, glass, plastics, carpet and pad, beverage containers, and batteries from construction tools. Attachment 13 Noxious Weed Control tetter Ranch at Coulter Creek September 2002 Subdivision Sketch Plan Application 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 04/17/2002 04:03 9709639793 ROARING FORK VEG MGT PAGE 01 ROARING FORK VEGETATION MGMT.CO, P.O.BOX 2525 BASALT,CO, 81621 970-963-9723 Colo. Dept. of Ag. Lic. #I0396 PROPOSAL FOR TREE & WEED5LRVICES JOE ENZER SNOWMASS LAND CO. 923-2880 FAX- 923-4305 APRIL 18,2002 NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN THE OLD LAWRENCE RANCH , GARFIELD COUNTY ,CO. MY COMPANY ENTENDS TO CONTROL THE PLANTS ON THE GARFIELD COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED LIST , DEPENDING ON THE SPECIES FOUND AND THE HABITAT IN WHICH THEY ARE FOUNDWILL DETERMINE THE CONTROL MEASURES THAT ARE IMPLEMENTED. ROARING FORK VEG. MGMT, WILL FOLLOW ALL LABEL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANY HERBICIDE THAT IS USED. THE TIMING OF THE APPUCATIONS AND THE DURATION WILL DEPEND ON THE WEATHER AND THE GROWTH STAGE OF THE TARGET PLANTS . SINCERELY, MATT JOHNS N .PRES Member of rhe Colorado Weed Management Association And the Colorado Association of Lawn Care Professionals Attachment 14 Site Plan and Road Design Drawing Set (See separate 24" by 36" drawing set) Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision Sketch Plan Application September 2002 P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Z4NC4NELL4 4110 4S5OC 4 TES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULT4114TS February 18, 2003 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: The Ranch at Coulter Creek Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax .RECEIVED FFR i O 2003 BUIQ NG GmFIE� COUNTY PLANNING In our January 24, 2003 letter report we indicated that the water analyses for the Lot #24 were still pending. Those lab results have now been received and are attached. The results show that, as with all parameters tested for this and the other two proposed water supply wells, all parameters that were tested were below the Maximum Contaminant Levels as established by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the EPA. The test for coliform bacteria indicated that the bacteria were absent from the sample. It appears from all of the water quality test results that water quality for the Lot #24 Well and the RCC Wells #5 and #7 is good. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. • / Bradley C. Pee , Geologist Attachments cc: Joe Enzer Yancy Nichol Z:\21000\21839 Snowmass Land Co\2003\Bean-Lot24WellWaterQual.doc 1 FE3 0 8 2003 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Compliance Montrg & Data Mngmnt Unit REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT YES [ ] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS **** PLEASE SEE INSTRUCTIONS AND EXAMPLES ON THE BACK OF THIS FORM **** PWSID #: COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 01 / 15 / 2003 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek SYSTEM ADDRESS: c/o Zancanella & Assts., 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: ( 970) 945 5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 1045 am/fir WATER TYPE: RAW INo chlorine or other treatment) [ ] or CHLORINATED [ 1 or OTHER TREATMENT [ 1 SOURCE(S): RCC Lot #24 Well LOCATION(S): - Address SAMPLE POINT(S): I County Road 115 ISLE KALA ut- FUHM1 Well Head For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE # A171/03-1 CLIENT NAME or ID# Evergreen Analytical, Inc. LABORATORY NAME Hazen Research, Inc. LAB PHONE # ( 303) 279 4501 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 01 / 16 / 2003 DATE ANALYZED See / Below / COMMENTS (pCi/I) (pCi/I) EPA (pCi/I) Date PARAMETER RESULT MCL METHOD Lab MDL Analyzed GROSS ALPHA 8.1 ± 3.5 SEE BELOW 900.0 1.9 01 / 27 / 2003 GROSS BETA 3.0 ± 2.6 50 900.0 2.2 01 / 27 / 2003 TOTAL SOLIDS (mg/L) 323 N/A 160.3 10 01 / 17 / 2003 RADIUM 226 RADIUM 228 URANIUM RADON 222 ADJUSTED ALPHA COMMENT: * * ** ** 15*** / / / / / / BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. NT = Not Tested for compound mg/L = Milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level " = MCL for Radium 226 and 228 COMBINED is 5 pCi/L **" = Gross Alpha minus Uranium equals Adjusted Alpha N/A = Not Applicable pCi/L = Picocuries per Liter Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit "" = MCL in the process of being set by EPA IF THE GROSS ALPHA EXCEEDS 10 pCi/I THE SAME OR EQUIVALENT SAMPLE MUST BE ANALYZED FOR RADIUM -226. IF THE RADIUM -226 EXCEEDS 3pCi, THE SAME OR AN EQUIVALENT SAMPLE MUST BE ANALYZED FOR RADIUM -228. IF THE GROSS ALPHA EXCEEDS 15pCi THE SAME OR ESU, ALENT,- AMPLE MUST ALSO BE ANALYZED FOR URANIUM. Robert Rostad Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by Laboratory Manager 02 / 07 / 2003 Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-CMDM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 Revised 03/01 - J:\WP\LABFORMS\RAD REPORT FORM.DOC Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking Water Section REPORTING FORM FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES • SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES ( ] or NO (XI THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS i PWSID #: /i //>L COUNTY: G-cz r r, e /d DATE COLLECTED: i/ / S/10 3 SYSTEM/ESTABUSHMENT NAME: fr, c/i a 614 -Pet' Cr e e k SYSTEM ADDRESS: % Z641 ca., e//a. 91/ s5 2C, /t fh CoYCity v Gle ii k,de d .;-75, tate: _C„___.Zp: r/6 e/ CONTACT PERSON: 3K /3eie-- PHONE: Th',' -945---3-70O SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: /3i--(‘‘, ,4ek TIME COLLECTED: /D. 15-i,4r WATER TYPE: RAW N.altering .roar t...are (HC) or CHLORINATED ( ) or OTHER TREATMENT [ I SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): - Address/Area ' SAMPLE POINT(S): 1i �C Lot#24 /oeil 1 ((Wit ty, / « //S /t'6,-1/ For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: aeMOVa-O« CLIENT NAME or ID#: LABORATORY NAME: S-Y\C .t-uSkYt0.l Lalonia.ithAts LAB PHONE #: 3"a81 -9 DATE/TIME RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: \ \ \ o 1ScC) DATE/TIME ANALYZED: COMMENTS: PARAMETER Coliform, Total /71 Reviewed & Approved by (#/100ml) (#/100m1) SM (#/10Omi) RESULT MCL METHOD LAB MDL 1 <1 9222 S /e4_1"b4 CG( / 'Z i I 65 Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Color.do Department o1 Pubic M..tth and Environment. WOOD-oWe2. 4300 Cherry Ct..k Or$v. South. D.nver. CO 90222-1530 Laboratory: Call driniicing water section of CDPHE immediately with any results other than <1 or absent. (303) 692-3547 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Nitrate/Nitrite as Nitrogen analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 1/15/03 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970)945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 10:45am WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): RCC Lot #24 Well County Road 115 Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 03-0283-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 1/16/03 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Lot 24 Well LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 1/16/03 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) NITRATE/NITRITE-N 0.44 10.0 300.0 0.076 NITRATE -N 0.44 10.0 300.0 0.056 NITRITE -N BDL 1.0 300.0 0.076 NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. ;J2L lcan 1Reviewed nd approved by Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Corrosivity analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970)945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 10:45am WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): RCC Lot #24 Well County Road 115 Well Head DATE COLLECTED: 1/15/03 DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 03-0283-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 1/16/03 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Lot 24 Well LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 1/16/03-1/28/03 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) LANGLIER INDEX +0.27 *** SM 2330B N/A CALCIUM CARBONATE 120 N/A 200.8 0.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS 331 N/A SM 2540C 10.0 pH 7.90 N/A 150.1 N/A TOTAL ALKALINITY 141 N/A SM 2320B 5.0 TEMPERATURE 20 °C N/A NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. N/A = Not applicable. *** = If Langelier Index is a negative number, water is corrosive. If Langelier Index is zero, water is balanced. If Langelier Index is a positive number, water is scale forming. CA —C -c-44‘,1 / CA L fQ F: c 3 Reviewed and approved by Title ate MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Original. Phase II, V Inorganic analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts, SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek WATER TYPE: RAW [X] SOURCE(S): RCC Lot 24 Well Glenwood Springs CITY PHONE: (970)945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 10:45am CHLORINATED [] LOCATION(S): County Road 115 DATE COLLECTED: 1/15/03 CO 81601 STATE ZIP OTHER TREATMENT [] SAMPLE POINT(S): Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 03-0283-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 1/16/03 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Lot 24 Well LAB PHONE: f303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 1/16/03-1/28/03 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) ANTIMONY BDL 0.006 200.8 0.002 ARSENIC 0.015 0.05 200.8 0.002 BARIUM 0.015 2.0 200.8 0.01 BERYLLIUM BDL 0.004 200.8 0.001 CADMIUM BDL 0.005 200.8 0.0005 CHROMIUM 0.0079 0.1 200.8 0.006 COPPER BDL 1.3* 200.8 0.01 CYANIDE BDL 0.2 SM4500-CN E 0.01 FLUORIDE BDL 4.0 SM4500-F C 0.4 LEAD BDL 0.015* 200.8 0.002 MERCURY BDL 0.002 245.1 0.0001 NICKEL BDL 0.1 200.8 0.01 SELENIUM 0.029 0.05 200.8 0.005 SODIUM 8.5 ** 200.8 0.16 SULFATE 120 500.0** 300.0 2.5 THALLIUM BDL 0.002 200.8 0.001 NT = Not Tested for compound mg/L = milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H = Holding Time has been exceeded BDL = Below Detection Limit * = Not an MCL, "Action Level" ** = Not an MCL, "Monitoring Requirement Only" % Eca \) Cc -11)/Q_ az( /0-1 Reviewed and approved by Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Z4NC4NELL4 /lNO 4550(1411E5, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULT4NT5 February 4, 2003 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: The Ranch at Coulter Creek Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax RECEIVED HI -3 OF). 2003 D&OUNTY BUILINGPLAN PLANNING This report presents the findings of the water supply investigations performed by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. for the proposed 480 acre Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision. Figure 1 shows the general location of the property and the approximate locations of the Lot #24 Well, RCC Well #5 and RCC Well #7. Information contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses for the 26 lots, the legal supply, well pump test reports, and water quality. Water Requirements Table 2, attached, is from an engineering report by Resource Engineering, Inc. dated October 18, 2002. It presents the diversions and consumptive use for the proposed 26 lot subdivision. The lots will be luxury homesites for homes up to 8500 square feet. Each homesite has been assigned two EQRs. The ranch house has been assigned one EQR, for a total of 53 EQRs. It is assumed that each EQR will represent 3.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day. Ten livestock units, each consuming 11 gpd, and an equestrian barn, using 100 gpd, have been included in the water requirements table. The water use calculation presumes that water will be diverted to irrigate up to 10,000 square feet of lawn or other equivalent outside uses at each residence. The lawn irrigation and other domestic uses are to be supplied by a community water system serving all 26 lots. Legal Supply Table 2 shows the Ranch at Coulter Creek is expected to divert an average 34.754 AF annually, and consumptively use 14.254 AF. The peak water demand month of June would require a continuous average diversion of 39.3 gpm to serve all twenty six lots. Case No. 02CW108 has been filed in District 5 Water Court as an augmentation plan for the new development. The Water Court case allows for diversions of up to 180 gpm from each of 5 wells to be located in a well field on the property. The three wells identified above are within the described well field. Because the new filing would be a junior water right and subject to calls, out -of -priority stream depletions are to be augmented by dry -up credits under the Ranch water rights, by releases from Laurence Ponds 1 — 4 and from Consolidated Reservoir. Physical Supply The Ranch at Coulter Creek Subdivision will be served by a community water system as defined by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. A minimum of three wells are to be used to supply the system. Three wells were constructed by Shelton Drilling Corporation during the last quarter of 2002. They are the Lot #24 Well and RCC Wells #5 and #7. Copies of the well construction reports are attached. We have also attached graphical representations of the construction details in Figures 24D, 5D and 7D, respectively. The table below lists the permit numbers and approximate locations of the three wells. The wells were drilled as monitoring wells. Well ID Permit # Completed Dist. From Sec. Line Dist. From Sec. Line Section Lot #24 Well 240236 4/25/02 75 FNL 1040 FEL 7 RCC Well #5 243865 10/23/02 150 FNL 1870 FEL 7 RCC Well #7 243861 10/29/02 765 FSL 1835 FEL th 6 All wells are located within Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6 P. M. Coples of the monitoring well permits are attached. Fee well permit applications will be filed when the augmentation plan, 02CW108, has been approved by Water Court. Pump tests were performed on all three wells by Samuelson Pump Company. The results of the tests are summarized in the table below: Well ID Dates Tested Rate (gpm) Test Length (hrs) Well Depth (ft) Static Level (ft) Available Drawdown (ft) Maximum Drawdown (ft) Recovery Length (min) Lot #24 10/15/02 — 25 25.5 185 131.8 53.2 37.42 59 Well 10/16/02 RCC 11/19/02 — 40 19.75 370 163.3 206.7 8.94 135 Well #5 11/20/02 RCC 11/14/02 — 40 24.75 420 116.2 303.8 4.73 60 Well #7 11/15/02 Data collected during the pump tests of the Lot 24 Well, RCC Well #5 and RCC Well #7 have been tabulated in attached Tables 24T, 5T and 7T, respectively. Graphical representations of the water level curves are provided in Figures 24W, 5W and 7W, respectively. Wells RCC #5 and RCC #7 were pumped continuously at 40 gallons per minute (gpm) for the length of the test. The Lot #24 Well test was begun at 30 gpm, but was reduced to 25 gpm when it appeared that the well would probably not be able to sustain the higher rate for the entire 24 hour test. The water level in each well appeared to have stabilized by the end of the tests. At no point in any of the tests did the water level in the wells approach their individual pump intakes. Recovery data following each test are listed along with the pumping data in Tables 24T, 5T and 7T. Recovery graphs, showing recovery as residual drawdown, are presented in Figures 24R, 5R and 7R. All three wells appeared to recover normally. The test results indicate that all three wells can be pumped for extended periods at their 2 respective test rates of 25, 40 and 40 gpm. These rates, when added together, yield a total flow rate of 105 gpm, which is well above the peak month's continuous average diversion of 39.3 gpm. From the pump test data it can be concluded that, with sufficient storage, the 3 wells should be able to provide adequate water for the proposed development. We believe that it is important to the long term reliability of the wells to continue the historic irrigation practice of importing large quantities of water into the geologic basin above the wells. Water is currently diverted from Mesa Creek through the Consolidated Reservoir and the Eta Ditch to the property. Water Quality Water samples were collected during the pump tests and sent to Evergreen Analytical, Inc. for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for Inorganic Chemicals (IOCs), Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), Synthetic Organic Chemicals (SOCs), nitrates/nitrites, radiological properties (gross alpha and beta), coliform bacteria and corrosivity. Results received to date, on Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) forms, are attached. Results received to date show that all potential contaminants for which tests were run were below the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) as established by the CDPHE. Samples collected for coliform bacteria analyses from RCC Wells #5 and #7 indicated that coliform bacteria were absent. Copies of the bacteria results are attached. When SOC and VOC samples for the Lot #24 Well were sent to the lab, the well at that time was referred to as the Bobcat Well Lot 20. Since then the lot configuration has changed and the lots have been renumbered. The Bobcat Well Lot 20 and the Lot #24 Well are the same well. Results of the analyses for IOCs, radiological, bacteriological and corrosivity for the Lot #24 Well are still pending, but will be forwarded to your office as soon as they are received from the lab. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. r c. l.,..(ytA, `-QL( Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Bradley C. Pik, Geologist Attachments cc: Joe Enzer Yancy Nichol Z:\21000\21839 Snowmass Land Co\Bean-WaterSupplyReptl.doc 3 R88W R87W 1 0 i00 Scale in Feet PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' DATE: JAN. 23, 2003 SHEET: 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: BCP CHKD BY: BCP APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: Walls—GPS.dwg SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/AYES, /NC. ENC/NEER/NC CONSULTANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1906 - 1000 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81302 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. 1 PROJECT: 21839 U z W 0 (/) W z Ngo moo w 00 0 w 0 Q IX m g� Q (1) 0 z Consumptive Use I (12) TOTAL 0.276 0.250 0.276 0.347 2.397 3.105 2.907 1.921 1.678 0.550 0.268 0.276 14.254 (11) Livestock 0.010 0.009 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 .- O (10) Crop Irrigation 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 O O 0 (9) Lawn Irrigation 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.079 2.121 2.838 2.631 1.645 1.410 0.274 0.000 0.000 co O 0 0 (8) Commercial or Other 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 co 0 O (7) Domestic In-house 0.265 0.239 0.265 0.256 0.265 0.256 0.265 0.265 0.256 0.265 0.256 0.265 CO - C) 1 Total Demand I (6) TOTAL 1.784 1.612 1.784 1.826 4.435 5.274 5.073 3.840 3.490 2.126 1.727 1.784 34.754 (5) Livestock 0.010 0.009 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0) 0 (4) Crop Irrigation 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 (3) Lawn Irrigation 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.099 2.651 3.547 3.289 2.056 1.763 0.342 0.000 0.000 13.747 (2) Equestrian barn 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0 0 0 (1) Domestic In-house 1.764 1,594 1.764 1.708 1.764 1.708 1.764 1.764 1.708 1.764 1.708 1.764 20.776 `TOTALS --> Month January February March April May June July August September October November December 0) 0 N O U) U) 0 U) CO N 0 0 0 ,r O r U R1 0 v U C 2) U W 0 v) 0 c E JC CO OR U U (0 0 as — C p) ). W 0 . c co 0 o. E O C F) O O th 8§ 0 Lot #24 Well GROUND LEVEL 0 20- �� j `y :4 -01 ---CEMENT 10'-40' .r 0' TO 42' 9' HOLE DIAMETER -1' TO Volcanic Clay 40- 60- 80- _ -+ _ 42' 0.240 WALL 7' PLAIN STEEL CSG 35' TO 155' 0.250 WALL 5,5' PVC CSG 100- __ 42' TO 185' Hard Volcanics 120- 140- 6.5' HOLE DIAMETER + STATIC WATER LEVEL 131.8' ON OCTOBER 15, 2002 160- 155' TO 180° 0.250 WALL ,a.. Red Cinders PVC PERF CSG 180- 185 - TOTAL DEPTH 185' LOT #24 WELL WELL DETAIL SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY AT COULTER CREEK FIGURE NO. 24D E NOT TO SCALE ATE:RANCH JANUARY 17, 2003 T EE1 OF 1 , ZANCANELLA ANJI ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS POST C'R% BOX 1900 - 1006 COOPER AVENUE GLENN= SNOWS, COLORADO 61602 (970) 945-5700 DRAW BY: BCP CNKD BY: BCP APPD BY: TAZ PLAN NO. Lot 24 Y1WIDstdl.dwg PROJECT: 21839 Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:15 AM Wayne Shelton 970-927-3801 p.01 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 240236 2. Owner Narne(s): Snowmass Land Co. Mailing Address: % Zancanella & Assoc. P.O. Box 1908 City, State, Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Phone # : 970-945-5700 WELT. j OCATIONN AS D TL -D NE 1/4 DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES ft. from Sec. line and 11. from SUBDIVISION: LOT: STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DATE COMPLETED: 4125/2002 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Lof #2 * } /) APPROVAL # GWS3 1-91-03 NE 1/4 Sec: 7 Twp: 7 S Range: 87 W Sec. line OR Northing: 4370775 Easting: 315459 BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary TOTAL DEPTH: 185 DEPTH COMPLETION: 185 5. GEOLOGIC LOG Depth TyEe of Material (Size, Color, and Type) 000-081 Volcanic Clay 081-155 Hard Volcanics 155-185 Red Cinders 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) 9.0 6.5 FROM (11) TO (ft) 0 42 7. PLAIN CASINO OD (in) Kind Wall Size 42 185 7.0 5.5 Steel 0.240 tom ft) To (R) -1 42 PVC 0.250 35 155 PERF. CASING : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 155 180 Water Located: 155+ Remarks : 8. Filter Pack Material : Size . Interval : 9. Packer Placement TYPe Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount beasity Interval Placement Cement 5 sks 6 gal/sk 10-40 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 2 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 131 ft. Date/Time Measured 4/25/2002 Production Rate 20 gpm Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 4/25/2002 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 13. 1 have regi the augments trade herein and k,'vw th corms scih.o ,, and that they) ata true to m(Pu Ply knowledge. mos t to Section 24.4-14 ( l3Xa) CRS, the malting of falsefalsetantalum'sa CO TRkACCTOR rent tY elton�) g Corp t �Phone : (970) 927-4182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 81621 Lic. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Signature Wayne Shelton / President Date 5/21/2002 Well ID: TABLE 24T Pump Test Data Ranch at Coulter Creek - Lot #24 Well Job No.: 21839 Client: Snowmass Land Co. Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Top of Casing Q = 25 gpm r= ft S.W.L. = 131.8 ft b= ft Time/Date on: 10/15/02 1:05 PM Time/Date off: 10/16/02 2:30 PM Test Length: 25:25:00 total time TIME Time W.L. Measurement Drawdown (feet) Q (gpm) t' (minutes) t/t' (minutes) (feet) (inches) 10/15/02 1:05 PM 0 131 10 SWL 30 10/15/02 1:06 PM 1 145 11 14.08 30 10/15/02 1:07 PM 2 155 0 23.17 30 10/15/02 1:08 PM 3 156 3 24.42 30 10/15/02 1:09 PM 4 158 6 26.67 30 10/15/02 1:10 PM 5 160 10 29.00 30 10/15/02 1:11 PM 6 162 0 30.17 30 10/15/02 1:13 PM 8 163 5 31.58 30 10/15/02 1:15 PM 10 164 2 32.33 30 10/15/02 1:17 PM 12 164 9 32.92 30 10/15/02 1:20 PM 15 165 5 33.58 30 10/15/02 1:25 PM 20 166 2 34.33 30 10/15/02 1:35 PM 30 167 6 35.67 30 10/15/02 1:45 PM 40 169 3 37.42 30 10/15/02 1:55 PM 50 166 8 34.83 30 10/15/02 2:05 PM 60 167 5 35.58 30 10/15/02 2:35 PM 90 170 0 38.17 25 10/15/02 3:05 PM 120 155 2 23.33 25 10/15/02 4:05 PM 180 155 4 23.50 25 10/15/02 5:05 PM 240 155 6 23.67 25 10/15/02 10:35 PM 570 155 11 24.08 25 10/16/02 6:05 AM 1020 156 0 24.17 25 10/16/02 2:30 PM 1525 155 0 23.17 25 10/16/02 2:31 PM 1526 148 6 16.67 Stopped Pumping 10/16/02 2:32 PM 1527 137 4 5.50 0 2 764 10/16/02 2:33 PM 1528 135 7 3.75 0 3 509 10/16/02 2:34 PM 1529 133 5 1.58 0 4 382 10/16/02 2:35 PM 1530 133 1 1.25 0 5 306 10/16/02 2:37 PM 1532 133 0 1.17 0 7 219 10/16/02 2:39 PM 1534 133 0 1.17 0 9 170 10/16/02 2:41 PM 1536 132 11 1.08 0 11 140 10/16/02 2:44 PM 1539 132 9 0.92 0 14 110 10/16/02 2:49 PM 1544 132 9 0.92 0 19 81 10/16/02 2:59 PM 1554 132 7 0.75 0 29 54 10/16/02 3:09 PM 1564 132 7 0.75 0 39 40 10/16/02 3:19 PM 1574 132 6 0.67 0 49 32 10/16/02 3:29 PM 1584 132 5 0.58 0 59 27 1/22/2003 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Lot24PumpTest 10-15-02.xls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (NI — o P ® • O P � O C R J ® Y C in t �o▪ U a� 'u.In, 3 e- 014 0 �(> 0 CM to. C o Q. 0 E n. T 0 0 0 0 0 0 c�! O a0 0 (}i) IGA01'a;eM 0 N 0 0 c0 0 00 Static Water Level = 131.8 ft --190 min. to end of test Q=25 /1-11-111--11—M-11 I 1 1 I 1 I 0 to 90 min. Q -77017--1..)m 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 c�! O a0 0 (}i) IGA01'a;eM 0 N 0 0 c0 0 00 0 0 0 Figure 24R Recovery Following 25 Hour Pumping Test - 10/15/02 to 10/16/02 Ranch at Coulter Creek - Lot #24 Well Recovery as Residual Drawdown 10 100 t/t' 1,000 10,000 100, 0 N- Ganef 0 3i;e;S woid 0 N wed) umopMeJO 0 0 M "i' Lot24PumpTest 10-15-02.xis Zancaneila & A Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Phase I, II, and V Organic analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 10/16/02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek (Laurence Ranch) c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Bob Bailey PHONE: (970)945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Bob Bailey TIME COLLECTED: 1:45pm WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): Bobcat Well Lot 20 Lot 20, Ranch at Coulter Creek Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] If yes, record information for second source or second PWSID #: SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-6521-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 10/17/02 COMMENTS: _ PAGE 1 CLIENT NAME OR ID #: Ranch at Coulter Creek Well#cLawrence Ranch) LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 10/21/02-10/30/02 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-6521-01 PWSID #: N/A ALL RESULTS SHOULD BE REPORTED IN µg/1 UNREGULATED VOC's (TRIHALOMETHANES): These THM results do NOT count as the regulated THM results for systems serving greater than 10,000 population. CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (14/1) BLANK RESULT (41) Chloroform 67-66-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chlorodibromomethane 124-48-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromoform 75-25-2 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/1) MCL (41) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (4/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 BDL 7 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 71-55-6 BDL 200 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 79-00-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 BDL 70 524.2 0.5 BDL Benzene 71-43-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 BDL 70 524.2 0.5 BDL Dichloromethane 75-09-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 BDL 700 524.2 0.5 BDL Monochlorobenzene 108-90-7 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL o -Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 BDL 600 524.2 0.5 BDL Para -Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 BDL 75 524.2 0.5 BDL Styrene 100-42-5 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Toluene 108-88-3 BDL 1,000 524.2 0.5 BDL Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 BDL 2 524.2 0.5 BDL Xylenes (total) 1330-20-7 BDL 10,000 524.2 0.5 BDL REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) MCL (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) Dioxin 1746-01-6 NT 0.00003 - - NT 2,4-D 94-75-7 BDL 70 515.1 0.43 BDL 2,4,5 -TP 93-72-1 BDL 50 515.1 0.24 BDL Alachlor 15972-60-8 BDL 2 507 0.5 BDL Atrazine 1912-24-9 BDL 3 507 0.5 BDL Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 BDL 0.2 525.2 0.2 BDL Carbofuran 1563-66-2 BDL 40 531.1 1.5 BDL Chlordane 57-74-9 BDL 2 508 0.5 BDL Dalapon 75-99-0 BDL 200 515.1 0.18 BDL Dibromochloropropane 96-12-8 BDL 0.2 504.1 0.05 BDL Dinoseb 85-85-7 BDL 7 515.1 0.37 BDL Diquat 85-00-7 BDL 20 549.1 0.44 BDL PAGE 2 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-6521-01 PWSID #: N/A REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's (CONT.) CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/1) MCL (41) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (4/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 103-23-1 BDL 400 525.2 0.5 BDL Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 - BDL 6 525.2 0.5 BDL Endothall 145-73-3 BDL 100 548.1 10 BDL Endrin 72-20-8 BDL 2 508 0.5 BDL Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 BDL 0.05 504.1 0.05 BDL Glyphosphate 1071-53-6 NT 700 -- BDL NT Heptachlor 76-44-8 BDL 0.4 508 0.2 BDL Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 BDL 0.2 508 0.2 BDL Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 BDL 1 508 0.5 BDL Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 BDL 50 508 0.5 BDL Lindane 58-89-9 BDL 0.2 508 0.2 BDL Methoxychlor 72-43-5 BDL 40 508 0.5 BDL Oxamyl 23135-22-0 BDL 200 531.1 2 BDL Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 BDL 1 515.1 0.28 BDL Picloram 1918-02-1 BDL 500 515.1 0.21 BDL Polychlorinated biphenyls 1336-36-3 BDL 0.5 508 0.05 BDL Simazine 122-34-9 BDL 4 507 0.5 BDL Toxaphene 8001-35-2 BDL 3 508 0.5 BDL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (14/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (4/1) BLANK RESULT (141) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran (Unk) BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldicarb 116-06-3 BDL 531.1 1 BDL Aldicarb sulfone 1646-87-4 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldicarb sulfoxide 1646-87-3 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldrin 309-00-2 BDL 508 0.5 BDL Butachlor 23814-66-9 BDL 507 0.5 BDL Carbaryl 63-25-2 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Dicamba 1989-00-9 BDL 515.1 0.24 BDL Dieldrin 60-57-1 BDL 508 0.5 BDL Methomyl 16752-77-5 BDL 531.1 0.5 BDL Metolachlor 51218-45-2 BDL 507 0.5 BDL Metribuzin 21087-64-9 BDL 507 0.5 BDL Propachlor 1918-16-7 BDL 507 0.5 BDL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg11) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (Iig/I) 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL l,l-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL PAGE 3 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-6521-01 PWSID #: N/A UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's (CONT.) CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (4/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/1) BLANK RESULT (.tg/I) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropene 542-75-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 2,2-Dichloropropane 590-20-7 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromobenzene 108-86-11 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromomethane 74-96-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chloroethane 75-00-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chloromethane 74-87-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Dibromomethane 74-95-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Fluorotrichloromethane 75-69-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Hexachlorobutadiene 87-66-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Isopropylbenzene 98-82-2 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL m -Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Naphthalene 91-20-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL o-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL p-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL p-Isopropyltoluene 25155-15-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Codes used: NT = Not tested for compound. B = The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. µg/1= Micrograms per liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the LAB MDL. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. Reviewed and approved by Fide Dat MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 PAGE 4 Hrti—Gb-000C I t(U 111;10 till rl in p c Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT rHli NU, d (UJGJ004 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORAD1313 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 I8o (303) 866-3581 - 1 SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY % PATRICK MILLER & KROPF PC 730 E DURANT STE 200 ASPEN, CO 81611- (970) 920-1028 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDJTIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shallsu ba used in nt thah a t no injuryay as to cause no will occur to another vested watery right or precfud i another ownrial injury to existing water rights. T'ne issuance nf erhis of a permit vested does not assure me app water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. h the Water ll 2) of The varriiancethas been gran of this il ntedall be in compliance by the State Board ofltExamierrs of WaateroWeiill Construction and Pction Rules 2 CCR ump Installation approval02-2, unless of a Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. Use of this wall is limited to 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 37-92-602(1)(f)• monitoring water levels and/or water quality sampling. This well is known as LAURENCE WELL # 5. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measuring. 5) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 6) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Weil Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. appropriate, The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s) and name ct aquifer as appro p and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a licensed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. If non-standard construction is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted In accordance with Rule 18 and approved pnor to well construction. 9) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including lithologic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For nonestandard construction, the report must include an as -built drawing showing details such as depth. casing, perforated zones, and a descnption of the grouting type and interval. 10) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this pernet. 11) Pursuant to Rule 6.2.3 of the Water Well Construction Rules, the well construction contractor shall submit the as -built well location on work reports required by Rule 17.3 within 60 days of completion of the well. The measured location must be accurate to 200 feet of the actual Vocation. The location information must Include either the 1/4, 1/4, SectionldTonenship, Range, and distances from section lines, or a GPS location pursuant to the Division of Water Resources g s. WS/;>— r uc LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER - 240236_ - DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 NE 1)4 Section Township 7 S Range 87 W Sixth P_M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft. from Ft. from UTM COORDINATES Northing: Section Line Section Line Easting: APPROVED JSG State Engineer t,r<eceiot No. 04884928 Z DATE ISSUED APRIT2002 EXPIRATION DATE RCC Well #5 GROUND LEVEL 0 `1v`�"� *`CEMENT 10'-40' Clays, Volcanics 50- ;'---------_ 0' T ❑ 40' 9' HOLE DIAMETER -1' TO 40' 0.240 WALL 7' PLAIN STEEL CSG 20' TO 180' 0.250 Volcanics 100- 150- WALL 5.5' PVC CSG STATIC WATER LEVEL 163.3' ,� ❑N NOVEMBER 19, 2002 200- 40' TO 370' 6,5" HOLE DIAMETER 250- ---- 180' TO 360' --� 0.250 WALL PVC PERF CSG Lakebed Sediments 300- 350- — 370 - TOTAL DEPTH 370' RCC WELL #5 WELL DETAIL SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY RANCH AT COULTER CREEK FIGURE 5D SCALE: NOT TO SCALE DATE: JANUARY 13, 2003 SHEET 1 (W 1 / ZA/l/CANELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1906 - 1005 COOPER A'.6)& CLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700 DRAWN BY: BCPBCP CHKD BY: APPD BY: TAZ PLAN NO. RCC 5 WdID9t0R.dwg PROJECT: 21839 Jan 10 03 02:32p Wayne Shelton 970-927-3801 P.2 ORIGINA WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER FOR OFFICE USE ONLY I- WELL PERMIT NUMBER 243865 2 Owner Name(s): Snowmass Land Co. Mailing Address: % Zancanella & Assoc. P.O. Box 1908 City, State, Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Phone # : 970-945-5700 i C C Of LI- # 5 APPROVAL # GWS31-91-03 WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec: 7 Twp: 7 S Range: 87 W 3' NW DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES ft. from Sec. line and ft. from Sec. line OR Northing: 4370766 Fasting: 315203 SUBDIVISION: LOT: BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 10/23/2002 TOTAL DEPTH: 370 DEPTH COMPLETION: 370 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) FROM (R) TO (It) Depth Type of Material (Size, Color, and Type) 9.0 0 40 000-068 Clays, Volcanics 6.5 40 370 068-365 Volcanics 365-370 Lakebed Sediments 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind Walt Size From (ft) To (ft) 7.0 Steel 0.240 -1 40 5.5 PVC 0.250 20 180 PERF. CASING : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 180 360 Water Located: Remarks : 180 - 360 8. Filter Pack Material : Size : interval : 9. Packer Placement Type : Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD Materia{ Amount Density' Interval Placement Cement 5 sks 6 gal/sk 10-40 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 5 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box if Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 163 ft. Date/Time Measured 10/23/2002 Production Rate 20+ gpm Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 10/23/2002 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 13. 1 have read the_statements made huein and Icnow Ute contents thereof, and dial they are truc 10 my knowled�z. (Pursuant to Section 244-1-1 (13Xa) CRS, the making of false statements conslrtutes pepury in the second degree std is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.) CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Corp. phone : (970) 927-4182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, . 81621 Lie. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Signat Date Wayne Shelton / President 46.- I 1/10/2002 ORIGINA TABLE 5T Pump Test Data Well ID: Ranch at Coulter Creek - RCC Well #5 Job No.: 21839 Client: Snowmass Land Co. Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Top of Casing Q = 40 gpm r = ft S.W.L. = 163.3 ft b = ft Time/Date on: 11/19/02 12:00 PM Time/Date off: 11/20/02 7:45 AM Test Length: 19:45:00 total time TIME Time W.L. Measurement Drawdown (feet) SWL Q (gpm) 30 t' (minutes) t/t' (minutes) 0 (feet) 163 (inches) 3 11/19/02 12:00 PM 11/19/02 12:01 PM 1 166 10.5 3.63 30 11/19/02 12:03 PM 3 166 9 3.50 30 11/19/02 12:04 PM 4 166 10.25 3.60 30 11/19/02 12:05 PM 5 166 9 3.50 30 11/19/02 12:06 PM 6 166 7.75 3.40 30 11/19/02 12:08 PM 8 166 6.75 3.31 30 11/19/02 12:10 PM 10 167 0.75 3.81 30 11/19/02 12:12 PM 12 167 1.75 3.90 30 11/19/02 12:15 PM 15 167 3.5 4.04 30 11/19/02 12:20 PM 20 167 4 4.08 30 11/19/02 12:30 PM 30 167 4.75 4.15 30 11/19/02 12:40 PM 40 167 5.75 4.23 30 11/19/02 12:50 PM 50 167 8.75 4.48 30 11/19/02 1:00 PM 60 167 9.5 4.54 30 11/19/02 1:30 PM 90 168 3.75 5.06 30 11/19/02 2:00 PM 120 168 7.75 5.40 30 11/19/02 2:40 PM 160 168 7.75 5.40 40 11/19/02 2:42 PM 162 169 11 6.67 40 11/19/02 2:43 PM 163 170 1.5 6.88 40 11/19/02 2:44 PM 164 170 2.25 6.94 40 11/19/02 2:45 PM 165 170 2.5 6.96 40 11/19/02 2:46 PM 166 170 3.25 7.02 40 11/19/02 2:48 PM 168 170 4.25 7.10 40 11/19/02 2:50 PM 170 170 2.75 6.98 40 11/19/02 2:52 PM 172 170 4 7.08 40 11/19/02 2:55 PM 175 170 5 7.17 40 11/19/02 3:00 PM 180 170 6 7.25 40 11/19/02 3:10 PM 190 170 6.5 7.29 40 11/19/02 3:20 PM 200 170 8 7.42 40 11/19/02 3:30 PM 210 170 9 7.50 40 11/19/02 3:40 PM 220 170 9 7.50 40 11/19/02 5:10 PM 310 171 4.5 8.13 40 11/19/02 5:45 PM 345 171 5.5 8.21 40 11/19/02 9:45 PM 585 171 11.5 8.71 40 11/20/02 7:10 AM 1150 172 2.25 8.94 40 11/20/02 7:40 AM 1180 172 2.25 8.94 40 11/20/02 7:40 AM 1180 171 10.75 8.65 Stopped Pumping 11/20/02 7:41 AM 1181 167 3 4.00 0 1 1181 11/20/02 7:42 AM 1182 166 11.5 3.71 0 2 591 11/20/02 7:43 AM 1183 166 9.5 3.54 0 3 394 11/20/02 7:44 AM 1184 166 8.5 3.46 0 4 296 11/20/02 7:45 AM 1185 166 6.75 3.31 0 5 237 11/20/02 7:46 AM 1186 166 5.75 3.23 0 6 198 11/20/02 7:48 AM 1188 166 5 3.17 0 8 149 11/20/02 7:50 AM 1190 166 3.75 3.06 0 10 119 11/20/02 7:55 AM 1195 166 1 2.83 0 15 80 11/20/02 8:01 AM 1201 165 10.75 2.65 0 21 57 11/20/02 8:10 AM 1210 165 7.5 2.38 0 30 40 11/20/02 8:30 AM 1230 165 2.25 1.94 0 50 25 11/20/02 8:40 AM 1240 165 0 1.75 0 60 21 11/20/02 9:10 AM 1270 164 7.75 1.40 0 90 14 11/20/02 9:55 AM 1315 164 4 1.08 0 135 10 1/22/2003 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. RCC We115 Pump Test.xls O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r E 0 O N �t CO0 CO o O O O O O O O O O O O O N et CO CO 0 N Net CO CO 0 N ef' (O N N N N N co M M M (i) lanai Je;eM RCC We115 Pump Test.xls Zancanella & As JStatic rater Level = 163.3 ft 1240 min. to end of test Q = 40 0 to 240 min. Q = 30 gpm 1 1 IPump Set at 363 ft. Total Depth = 370 ft. O N �t CO0 CO o O O O O O O O O O O O O N et CO CO 0 N Net CO CO 0 N ef' (O N N N N N co M M M (i) lanai Je;eM RCC We115 Pump Test.xls Zancanella & As 0 0 0 • r(lanai Figure 5R Recovery Following 20 Hour Pumping Test - 11/19/02 to 11/20/02 Ranch at Coulter Creek - RCC Well #5 Recovery as Residual Drawdown 10 100 t/t' 1,000 10,000 100, 0 o (lanai N Due}S woJJ coy) loaf) uMopMeia ..,1- RCC We115 Pump Test.xls Zancanella & Associ Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking Water Section REPORTING FORM FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES SAMPLER. PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES ❑ or NO ® THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek DATE COLLECTED: 11/20/02 SYSTEM ADDRESS: c/o Zancanella & Associates, Inc. 1005 Cooper AveCity: Glenwood Spgs State' Co Zip: 81601 CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: 970-945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 11:30 AM WATER TYPE: RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) bQ Or CHLORINATED [ ] or OTHER TREATMENT [ ] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): - Address/Area SAMPLE POINT(S): RCC Well #5 1 County Road 115 I Well Head For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: ©2- "7z4 5---Q/A-1 CLIENT NAME or ID#- Ec)e- A'ta- ['a .(4 LABORATORY NAME: Aaa-vw /a6dv�' iLAB PHONE #' e3i,:3-5Z3 3 DATE/TIME RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: i1/2410 2- `f: oo�Porn DATE/TIME ANALYZED: /1/Zi /b2 OCOp m COMMENTS: (#/100m1) (#1100m1) SM (# 1100mI) PARAMETER RESULT MCL METHOD LAB MDL i Coliform, Total CI < 1 9222B Ri;Giewed & Approved by // / zi1/ bZ Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Departrnent of Public Health and Environment. WQCO-DW-B2. 4300 Cherry Crook Drive South. Denver, CO 80222-1530 Laboratory: Call drinking water section of CDPHE immediately with any results other than < 1 or absent. (303) 692-3547 DEC 10 2002 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Compliance Montrg & Data Mngmnt Unit REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT YES [ ] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS **** PLEASE SEE INSTRUCTIONS AND EXAMPLES ON THE BACK OF THIS FORM **** PWSID #: COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11 / 20 / 2002 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek SYSTEM ADDRESS: c/o Zancanella & Assts., 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: ( 970) 945 5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 1130 am/pm WATER TYPE: RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) [X] or CHLORINATED [ 1 or OTHER TREATMENT [ ] SOURCE(S): RCC Well #5 LOCATION(S): - Address SAMPLE POINT(S): I County Road 115 I Well Head (StE BACK OF CUHM) For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE # K302/02-1 CLIENT NAME or ID# Evergreen Analytical, Inc. LABORATORY NAME Hazen Research, Inc. LAB PHONE # ( 303) 279 4501 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 11 / 22 / 2002 DATE ANALYZED See / Below / COMMENTS (pCi/I) (pCi/1) EPA (pCi/I) Date PARAMETER RESULT MCL METHOD Lab MDL Analyzed GROSS ALPHA 2.2 ± 2.0 SEE BELOW 900.0 1 .3 12 / 05 / 2002 GROSS BETA 9.2 ± 3.0 50 900.0 2.3 12 / 05 / 2002 TOTAL SOLIDS (mg/L) 373 N/A 160.3 10 11 / 25 / 2002 RADIUM 226 RADIUM 228 URANIUM RADON 222 ADJUSTED ALPHA COMMENT: 15*** / / / / / / / / BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. NT = Not Tested for compound mg/L = Milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level " = MCL for Radium 226 and 228 COMBINED is 5 pCi/L • "" = Gross Alpha minus Uranium equals Adjusted Alpha N/A = Not Applicable pCi/L = Picocuries per Liter Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit "" = MCL in the process of being set by EPA IF THE GROSS ALPHA EXCEEDS 10 pCi/I THE SAME OR EQUIVALENT SAMPLE MUST BE ANALYZED FOR RADIUM -226. IF THE RADIUM -226 EXCEEDS 3p i, THE SAME OR AN EQUIVALENT SAMPLE MUST BE ANALYZED FOR RADIUM -228. IF THE GROSS ALPHA EXCEEDS 15pCi THE SAME 0 ej !VALE A PLE MUST ALSO BE ANALYZED FOR URANIUM. Robert Rostad Laboratory Resu is Reviewed & Approved by Laboratory Manager 12 / 09 / 2002 Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-CMDM-82, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 Revised 03/01 - J:\WP\LABFORMS\RAD REPORT FORM.DOC Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Nitrate/Nitrite as Nitrogen analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11/20/02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970)945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 11:30am WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): RCC Well #5 County Road 115 Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7285-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/21/02 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Well #5 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/21/02 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) NITRATE/NITRITE-N 0.13 10.0 300.0 0.076 NITRATE -N 0.13 10.0 300.0 0.056 NITRITE -N BDL 1.0 300.0 0.076 NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. Reviewed and approved Title ate/ MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Corrosivity analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOS][TE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfiled SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave, STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek WATER TYPE: RAW [X] SOURCE(S): RCC Well #5 Glenwood Springs CITY PHONE: (970)945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 11:30am CHLORINATED [] LOCATION(S): County Road 115 DATE COLLECTED: 11/20/02 CO 81601 STATE ZIP OTHER TREATMENT [] SAMPLE POINT(S): Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7285-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/20/02 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Well #5 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/21/02-12/03/02 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) LANGLIER INDEX +0.47 *** SM 2330B N/A CALCIUM CARBONATE 67 N/A 200.8 0.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS 380 N/A SM 2540C 10.0 pH 8.35 N/A 150.1 N/A TOTAL ALKALINITY 145 N/A SM 2320B 5.0 TEMPERATURE 20 °C N/A NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. N/A = Not applicable. * ** = If Langelier Index is a negative number, water is corrosive. If Langelier Index is zero, water is balanced. If Langelier Index is a positive number, water is scale forming. P A TC—cccot C reEgo � 11 ti >_ Reviewed and approved by Title to MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Original, Phase II, V Inorganic analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Spring STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970195-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 11:30am WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [X] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): RCC Well #5 County Road 115 DATE COLLECTED: 11/20/02 CO 81601 STATE ZIP OTHER TREATMENT [] SAMPLE POINT(S): Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7285-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/21/02 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Well #5 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/21/02-12/02/02 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) ANTIMONY BDL 0.006 200.8 0.002 ARSENIC BDL 0.05 200.8 0.002 BARIUM 0.032 2.0 200.8 0.01 BERYLLIUM BDL 0.004 200.8 0.001 CADMIUM BDL 0.005 200.8 0.0005 CHROMIUM 0.0072 0.1 200.8 0.006 COPPER BDL 1.3* 200.8 0.01 CYANIDE 0.011 0.2 SM4500-CN E 0.01 FLUORIDE BDL 4.0 SM4500-F C 0.4 LEAD BDL 0.015* 200.8 0.002 MERCURY BDL 0.002 245.1 0.0001 NICKEL BDL 0.1 200.8 0.01 SELENIUM 0.013 0.05 200.8 0.005 SODIUM 25 ** 200.8 0.16 SULFATE 140 500.0** 300.0 0.5 THALLIUM BDL 0.002 200.8 0.001 NT = Not Tested for compound mg/L = milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H = Holding Time has been exceeded BDL = Below Detection Limit * = Not an MCL, "Action Level" ** = Not an MCL, "Monitoring Requirement Only" Reviewed and approved by Title ate MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Phase I. II, and V Organic analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11/20/02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek WATER TYPE: RAW [X] SOURCE(S): RCC Well #5 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 CITY STATE ZIP PHONE: (970)945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 11: 3 Oam CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): County Road 115 Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] If yes, record information for second source or second PWSID #: SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7285-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/21/02 CLIENT NAME OR ID #: RCC Well #5 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/22/02-12/12/02 COMMENTS: Dalapon showed a 41.5% recovery on the LCS: Pentachorophenol showed a 16.6% recovery on the LCS. Dalapon also showed a low recovery on the closing CCV. Neither ana yte was detected in the sample. PAGE 1 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-7285-01 PWSID #: N/A ALL RESULTS SHOULD BE REPORTED IN µg/1 UNREGULATED VOC's (TRIHALOMETHANES): These THM results do NOT count as the regulated THM results for systems serving greater than 10,000 population. CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (µg/I) Chloroform 67-66-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chlorodibromomethane 124-48-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromoform 75-25-2 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/l) MCL (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (4/1) BLANK RESULT (4/1) 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 BDL 7 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 71-55-6 BDL 200 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 79-00-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 BDL 70 524.2 0.5 BDL Benzene 71-43-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 BDL 70 524.2 0.5 BDL Dichloromethane 75-09-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 BDL 700 524.2 0.5 BDL Monochlorobenzene 108-90-7 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL o -Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 BDL 600 524.2 0.5 BDL Para -Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 BDL 75 524.2 0.5 BDL Styrene 100-42-5 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Toluene 108-88-3 BDL 1,000 524.2 0.5 BDL Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 BDL 2 524.2 0.5 BDL Xylenes (total) 1330-20-7 BDL 10,000 524.2 0.5 BDL REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (.tg/I) MCL (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (p.g/I) BLANK RESULT (µg/I) Dioxin 1746-01-6 NT 0.00003 - - NT 2,4-D 94-75-7 BDL 70 515.1 0.43 BDL 2,4,5 -TP 93-72-1 BDL 50 515.1 0.24 BDL Alachlor 15972-60-8 BDL 2 507 0.36 BDL Atrazine 1912-24-9 BDL 3 507 0.34 BDL Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 BDL 0.2 525.2 0.2 BDL Carbofuran 1563-66-2 BDL 40 531.1 1.5 BDL Chlordane 57-74-9 BDL 2 508 0.5 BDL Dalapon 75-99-0 BDL 200 515.1 0.18 BDL Dibromochloropropane 96-12-8 BDL 0.2 504.1 0.05 BDL Dinoseb 85-85-7 BDL 7 515.1 0.37 BDL Diquat 85-00-7 BDL 20 549.1 0.44 BDL PAGE 2 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-7285-01 PWSID #: N/A REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's (CONT.) CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/1) MCL (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (lag/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/I) Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 103-23-1 BDL 400 525.2 0.5 BDL Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 BDL 6 525.2 0.5 BDL Endothall 145-73-3 BDL 100 548.1 10 BDL Endrin 72-20-8 BDL 2 508 0.5 BDL Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 BDL 0.05 504.1 0.05 BDL Glyphosphate 1071-53-6 NT 700 -- BDL NT Heptachlor 76-44-8 BDL 0.4 508 0.2 BDL Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 BDL 0.2 508 0.2 BDL Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 BDL 1 508 0.5 BDL Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 BDL 50 508 0.5 BDL Lindane 58-89-9 BDL 0.2 508 0."? BDL Methoxychlor 72-43-5 BDL 40 508 0.5 BDL Oxamyl 23135-22-0 BDL 200 531.1 2 BDL Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 BDL 1 515.1 0.28 BDL Picloram 1918-02-1 BDL 500 515.1 0.21 BDL Polychlorinated biphenyls 1336-36-3 BDL 0.5 508 0.05 BDL Simazine 122-34-9 BDL 4 507 0.35 BDL Toxaphene 8001-35-2 BDL 3 508 0.5 BDL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (pg/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran (Unk) BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldicarb 116-06-3 BDL 531.1 1 BDL Aldicarb sulfone 1646-87-4 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldicarb sulfoxide 1646-87-3 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldrin 309-00-2 BDL 508 0.5 BDL Butachlor 23814-66-9 BDL 507 0.53 BDL Carbaryl 63-25-2 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Dicamba 1989-00-9 BDL 515.1 0.24 BDL Dieldrin 60-57-1 BDL 508 0.5 BDL Methomyl 16752-77-5 BDL 531.1 0.5 BDL Metolachlor 51218-45-2 BDL 507 0.38 BDL Metribuzin 21087-64-9 BDL 507 0.38 BDL Propachlor 1918-16-7 BDL 507 1.1 BDL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/I) 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1.1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1.2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL PAGE 3 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-7285-01 PWSID #: N/A UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's (CONT.) CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (1.1g/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropene 542-75-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 2,2-Dichloropropane 590-20-7 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromobenzene 108-86-11 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromomethane 74-96-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chloroethane 75-00-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chloromethane 74-87-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Dibromomethane 74-95-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Fluorotrichloromethane 75-69-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Hexachlorobutadiene 87-66-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Isopropylbenzene 98-82-2 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL m -Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Naphthalene 91-20-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL o-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL p-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL p-Isopropyltoluene 25155-15-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Codes used: NT = Not tested for compound. B = The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. µg/I = Micrograms per liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the LAB MDL. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. Reviewed and approved by 7v I cA I h r cr:7•3 rZ ( /04 - Title [Fate MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 PAGE 4 Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE .STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 243865 DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD Lot: Block: Filing: Subdiv: RANCH AT COULTER CREEK SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY P0BOX 6119 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615- (970) 923-2880 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 37-92-602(1)(f). Use of this well is limited to monitoring water levels and/or water quality sampling. This well is known as the RCC Well No. 5. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measuring. 5) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 6) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s) and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8) This well must be constructed by or under the supervision of a licensed we!! driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. If non-standard construction is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted in accordance with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. 9) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including lithologic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction, the report must include an as -built drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and interval. 10) Pursuant to Rule 6.2.3 of the Water Well Construction Rules, the well construction contractor shall submit the as -built well location on work reports required by Rule 17.3 within 60 days of completion of the well. The measured location must be accurate to 200 feet of the actual location. The location information must include either the 1/4, 1/4, Section, Township, Range, and distances from section lines, or a GPS location pursuant to the Division of Water Resources' guidelines. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2391-064-00-144 - NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R111514 (totaling 268.14 acres) APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 7 Township 7 S Range 87 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft. from Section Line Ft. from Section Line UTM COORDINATES Northing: Easting: APPROVED DMW F'r?➢ ,_" Receipt No. 9501278E State Engineer DATE ISSUED SEP 2 5 262 By EXPIRATION DATE.'` ` 6.• RCC Well #7 GROUND LEVEL 0 :�j�4.. A4 CEMENT 10'-40' Cobbles, 50- 0' TO 139' Volcanics, Cinders 9' HOLE DIAMETER -1' TO 139' 0.240 WALL 100- 7' PLAIN STEEL CSG STATIC WATER LEVEL 116.2' NOVEMBER 14, 2002 130' TO 180' 0.250 WALL 150- 5,5' PVC CSG 200- 139' TO 420' 6,5' HOLE DIAMETER TO 410' 250-180' Votcanics = 0,250 WALL PVC PERF CSG 300- =_ 350- E Lakebed 400- -_ Sediments? TOTAL DEPTH 420' RCC WELL #7 WELL DETAIL /\<\ SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY RANCH AT COULTER CREEK FR:URE No. 7D SCALE NOT TO SC B�ARY 13, 2003 SHEET OF 1 7 ZANCA/1ELLA AND ASSUCMTESSLL" INC. ENGZNttRZM tLWSlt iAiVTS DRAWN BY: BCP CHKO BY: BCP APPD Br: TAZ PUN No. RCC 7 NWRatatdwq O Po OD eMOM, COLORADO MOOR (970) ANNUS700 QCT: 21839 Jan 10 03 02:32p Wayne Shelton 970-927-3801 p. 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1- WELL PERMIT NUMBER 243866 r? C C <= 2 Owner Name(s): Snowmass Land Co. Mailing Address: % Zancanella & Assoc. P.O. Box 1908 City, State, Zip : Glenwood Springs, Co. 81602 Phone # : 970-945-5700 APPROVAL # GWS3I-91-03 WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED Sec: 6 Twp: 7 S Range: 87 W ' NW 1/4 SE 1/4 DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES ft. from Sec. line and ft. from Sec. line OR Northing: 4371049 Easting: 315213 SUBDIVISION: LOT: BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 10/29/2002 TOTAL DEPTH: 420 DEPTH COMPLETION: 420 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) FROM (ft) TO (ft) Depth Type of Material (Size, Color, and Type) 9.0 0 139 000-120 Cobbles, Volcanics Cinders 6.5 139 423 120-415 Volcanic Flows 415-420 Lakebed Sediments 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind Wall Six From (ft) To (ft) 7.0 Steel 0.240 -1 139 5.5 PVC 0.250 130 180 PERF. CASING : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 180 410 Water Located: 180 + Remarks : 8. Filter Pack Material : Size : Interval : 9. Packer Placement Type : Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount Density Interval Placement Cement 5 sks 6 gal/sk 10-40 poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 5 oz. 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 115 ft. Date/Time Measured 10/29/2002 Production Rate 30+ gpm Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 10/29/2002 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 1 have read due statements made herein and know dm contents thereof, and that they am true o my knowledge. (Pursuant to Section 24-4-1-4 (13)(a) CRS. the making of false statements 13 • oonstitntcs ptajuty m the second d ce and is puntsl a,Ie as a dans 1 misdemeanor.) Phone : (970) 927-4182 CONTRACTOR : S ielton Drilling Corp. Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 1621 Lic. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President Signature J 1 - --------4.Date 11/10/2002 ORIGNAL TABLE 7T Pump Test Data Well ID: Ranch at Coulter Creek - RCC Well #7 Job No.: 21839 Client: Snowmass Land Co. Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Top of Casing Q = 40 gpm r= ft S.W.L. = 116.2 ft b= ft Time/Date on: 11/14/02 11:30 AM Time/Date off: 11/15/02 12:14 PM Test Length: 24:44:00 total time TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement Drawdown (feet) Q (gpm) t' (minutes) t/t' (feet) (inches) 11/14/02 11:30 AM 0 116 2 SWL 40 11/14/02 11:31 AM 1 119 7 3.42 40 11/14/02 11:32 AM 2 119 8.5 3.54 40 11/14/02 11:33 AM 3 119 9.5 3.63 40 11/14/02 11:34 AM 4 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 11:35 AM 5 119 8 3.50 40 11/14/02 11:36 AM 6 119 7.5 3.46 40 11/14/02 11:38 AM 8 119 8.75 3.56 40 11/14/02 11:41 AM 11 119 8.5 3.54 40 11/14/02 11:45 AM 15 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 11:50 AM 20 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 12:00 PM 30 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 12:20 PM 50 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 12:30 PM 60 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 1:00 PM 90 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 1:30 PM 120 119 9 3.58 40 11/14/02 2:30 PM 180 119 9.5 3.63 40 11/14/02 3:30 PM 240 119 9.25 3.60 40 11/14/02 4:30 PM 300 120 4.25 4.19 40 11/14/02 8:52 PM 562 120 6 4.33 40 11/15/02 7:05 AM 1175 120 9 4.58 40 11/15/02 12:15 PM 1485 120 10.75 4.73 40 11/15/02 12:16 PM 1486 116 11 0.75 Stopped Pumping 1 1486 11/15/02 12:17 PM 1487 116 10.25 0.69 0 2 744 11/15/02 12:18 PM 1488 116 10.75 0.73 0 3 496 11/15/02 12:19 PM 1489 116 11.5 0.79 0 4 372 11/15/02 12:20 PM 1490 117 0.5 0.88 0 5 298 11/15/02 12:23 PM 1493 117 0 0.83 0 8 187 11/15/02 12:25 PM 1495 117 0 0.83 0 10 150 11/15/02 12:27 PM 1497 117 0 0.83 0 12 125 11/15/02 12:30 PM 1500 116 11.75 0.81 0 15 100 11/15/02 12:35 PM 1505 116 11.5 0.79 0 20 75 11/15/02 12:45 PM 1515 116 11.25 0.77 0 30 51 11/15/02 12:55 PM 1525 116 11.25 0.77 0 40 38 11/15/02 1:05 PM 1535 116 11.25 0.77 0 50 31 11/15/02 1:15 PM 1545 116 11 0.75 0 60 26 1/22/2003 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. RCC We117 Pump Test.xls 0 O 0 0 o O 0 0 0 P 0 O 0 E CD E H 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O N '- (0 co O N (0 03 O N et (0 00 0 N d (0 0 0 N N N N N N CO CO CO CO CO () 19A0'1 ie eM RCC We117 Pump T Zancanella & Associates, 8 N JStatic Water Level = 116.2 ft 1 iLrrL r 77 7 it Is r 6 1 C Q = 40 gpm throughout test. C k P r r P Pump Set at 403 ft. Total Depth = 420 ft. 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O N '- (0 co O N (0 03 O N et (0 00 0 N d (0 0 0 N N N N N N CO CO CO CO CO () 19A0'1 ie eM RCC We117 Pump T Zancanella & Associates, 8 N o l 0 0 J V Bi N E 2 L LL 20 ii+ fy LL G 0 v % 30 - L 0 40 RCC We117 Pump Test.xls Zancanella & Asso S N industrial LABORATORIES Industrial Laboratories is your Independent, third party analytical testing laboratory To: Evergreen Analytical 4036 Youngfield Wheat Ridge CO 80033-3862 Attn: Carl Smits R CC 1)e/I# 7' E\ O iV 2 1 2002 EV1601 Date Received: 11/15/2002 Date Reported: 11/19/2002 PO Number: 001 116 Note: Sample test procedures conform to EPA 40CFR136 requirements. Test Analysis Lab No. Sample Description Method Result Units MDL Date/Bv 021115009-01A 02-7141-01N 11/14/02 Total Coliforms MF SM 9222 B < 1 CFU/100mL 11/18/2( TV MDL = Method Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the Method Detection Limit Mike Gross, Laboratory Director Page: 1 of 1 1450 East 62nd Avenue • Denver, Colorado 90216 • (303) 287-9691 • (303) 287-0964 Fax • www.industriallabs.net Receipt of analysis services acknowledges the terms and conditions on ,ne reverse side and acknowledges that they are part of this order. This report is not to be reproduced in whole or in part for advertising purposes without obtaining prior written authorization. DEC 0 4 2002 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Compliance Montrg & Data Mngmnt Unit REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT YES [ ] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS * * * * PLEASE SEE INSTRUCTIONS AND EXAMPLES ON THE BACK OF THIS FORM * * * * PWSID #: COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11 / 14 / 2002 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek SYSTEM ADDRESS: c/o Zancanella & Assts., 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO BoxCITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: ( 970) 945 5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 1445 am/pm WATER TYPE: RAW (No chlorine or other treatment) [X] or CHLORINATED [ ] or OTHER TREATMENT [ ] SOURCE(S): RCC Well #7 LOCATION(S): - Address SAMPLE POINT(S): County Road 115 I Well Head (Stt eAUK OF FUHM) For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE # K206/02-1 CLIENT NAME or ID# Evergreen Analytical, Inc. LABORATORY NAME Hazen Research, Inc. LAB PHONE # ( 303) 279 4501 DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY 11 / 15 / 2002 DATE ANALYZED See / Below / COMMENTS (pCi/I) (pCi/I) EPA (pCi/I) Date PARAMETER RESULT MCL METHOD Lab MDL Analyzed GROSS ALPHA 2.2 ± 2.1 SEE BELOW 900.0 1.5 11 / 22 / 2002 GROSS BETA 4.9 ± 2.8 50 900.0 2.4 11 / 22 / 2002 TOTAL SOLIDS (mg/L) 331 N/A 160.3 10 11 / 19 / 2002 RADIUM 226 RADIUM 228 URANIUM RADON 222 ** ** ADJUSTED ALPHA 15*** COMMENT: BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. NT = Not Tested for compound mg/L = Milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level " = MCL for Radium 226 and 228 COMBINED is 5 pCi/L """ = Gross Alpha minus Uranium equals Adjusted Alpha N/A = Not Applicable pCi/L = Picocuries per Liter Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit " = MCL in the process of being set by EPA IF THE GROSS ALPHA EXCEEDS 10 pCi/I THE SAME OR EQUIVALENT SAMPLE MUST BE ANALYZED FOR RADIUM -226. IF THE RADIUM -226 EXCEEDS 3pCi, THE SAME OR AN EQUIVALENT SAMPLE MUST BE ANALYZED FOR RADIUM -228. IF THE GROSS ALPHA EXCEEDS 15pCi THE SAME OR n %IVALEr • M• u T ALSO BE ANALYZED FOR URANIUM. w Robert Rostad Laboratory Results Reviewed & Approved by Laboratory Manager 12 / 03 / 2002 Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-CMDM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 Revised 03/01 - J:\WP\LABFORMS\RAD REPORT FORM.DOC Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Nitrate/Nitrite as Nitrogen analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11/14/02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Copper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 2:45pm WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): RCC Well #7 County Road 155 Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7141-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/15/02 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Well #7 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/15/02 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) NITRATE/NITRITE-N 5.60 10.0 300.0 0.076 NITRATE -N 5.60 10.0 300.0 0.056 NITRITE -N BDL 1.0 300.0 0.076 NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. lwvy. i ecCry(. .b /i/Q 7 d' Oz_ Reviewed and approved by Title Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Corrosivity analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek WATER TYPE: RAW [X] SOURCE(S): RCC Well #7 Glenwood Springs CITY PHONE: (970)945-5700 TIME COLLECTED: 2:45pm CHLORINATED [] LOCATION(S): County Road 115 DATE COLLECTED: 11/14/02 CO 81601 STATE ZIP OTHER TREATMENT [] SAMPLE POINT(S): Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7141-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/15/02 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Well #7 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/15/02-11/21/02 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) LANGLIER INDEX +.28 * * * SM 2330B N/A CALCIUM CARBONATE 140 N/A 200.8 0.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS 330 N/A SM 2540C 10.0 pH 7.62 N/A 150.1 N/A TOTAL ALKALINITY 236 N/A SM 2320B 5.0 TEMPERATURE 20 °C N/A NT = Not Tested for compound. mg/L = milligrams per Liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. H = Holding Time has been exceeded. BDL = Below Detection Limit. N/A = Not applicable. *** = If Langelier Index is a negative number, water is corrosive. If Langelier Index is zero, water is balanced. If Langelier Index is a positive number, water is scale forming. Reviewed and approved by /mac-ioir\j 1 CA L arD Title �2/ ' �vf Q2-- Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Original. Phase II. V Inorganic analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970)945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 2:4542m WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): RCC Well #7 County Road 115 DATE COLLECTED: 11/14/02 CO 81601 STATE ZIP OTHER TREATMENT [] SAMPLE POINT(S): Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7141-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/15/02 COMMENTS: CLIENT NAME OR ID#: RCC Well #7 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/15/02-11/22/02 PARAMETER RESULT (mg/L) MCL (mg/L) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (mg/L) ANTIMONY BDL 0.006 200.8 0.002 ARSENIC 0.0022 0.05 200.8 0.002 BARIUM 0.16 2.0 200.8 0.01 BERYLLIUM BDL 0.004 200.8 0.001 CADMIUM BDL 0.005 200.8 0.0005 CHROMIUM BDL 0.1 200.8 0.006 COPPER BDL 1.3* 200.8 0.0005 CYANIDE BDL 0.2 SM4500-CN E 0.01 FLUORIDE 0.43 4.0 SM4500-F C 0.4 LEAD BDL 0.015* 200.8 0.0004 MERCURY BDL 0.002 245.1 0.0001 NICKEL BDL 0.1 200.8 0.01 SELENIUM BDL 0.05 200.8 0.005 SODIUM 12 ** 200.8 0.16 SULFATE 20.1 500.0** 300.0 0.5 THALLIUM BDL 0.002 200.8 0.001 NT = Not Tested for compound mg/L = milligrams per Liter MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit H = Holding Time has been exceeded BDL = Below Detection Limit * = Not an MCL, "Action Level" ** = Not an MCL, "Monitoring Requirement Only" Reviewed and a roved b E -C -41N f C 11, 1/Q (Tat"- `/L/010Z PP y Title ate MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — Drinking Water Section Reporting form for Phase L II, and V Organic analyses Sampler: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM — FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT OR COMPOSITE SET YES [] or NO [X] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWSID #: N/A COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11/14/02 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Ranch at Coulter Creek c/o Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM/ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 STREET ADDRESS/PO BOX CITY STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970)945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Brad Peek TIME COLLECTED: 2:45pm WATER TYPE: RAW [X] CHLORINATED [] OTHER TREATMENT [] SOURCE(S): RCC Well #7 LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): County Road 115 Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [] OR NO [X] If yes, record information for second source or second PWSID #: SOURCE(S): LOCATION(S): SAMPLE POINT(S): For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 02-7141-01 LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/15/02 CLIENT NAME OR ID #: RCC Well #7 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/21/02-12/12/02 COMMENTS: Dalapon showed a 41.5% recovery on the LCS: Pentachorophenol showed a 16.6% recovery on the LCS. Dalapon also showed a low recovery on the closing CCV. Neither analyte was detected in the sample. PAGE 1 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-7141-01 PWSID #: N/A ALL RESULTS SHOULD BE REPORTED IN .tg/1 UNREGULATED VOC's (TRIHALOMETHANES): These THM results do NOT count as the regulated THM results for systems serving greater than 10,000 population. CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (ng/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (ng/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) Chloroform 67-66-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chlorodibromomethane 124-48-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromoform 75-25-2 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) MCL (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (11g/1) 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 BDL 7 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 71-55-6 BDL 200 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 79-00-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 BDL 70 524.2 0.5 BDL Benzene 71-43-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2 BDL 70 524.2 0.5 BDL Dichloromethane 75-09-2 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 BDL 700 524.2 0.5 BDL Monochlorobenzene 108-90-7 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL o -Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 BDL 600 524.2 0.5 BDL Para -Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 BDL 75 524.2 0.5 BDL Styrene 100-42-5 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Toluene 108-88-3 1.1 1,000 524.2 0.5 BDL Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 BDL 100 524.2 0.5 BDL Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 BDL 5 524.2 0.5 BDL Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 BDL 2 524.2 0.5 BDL Xylenes (total) 1330-20-7 BDL 10,000 524.2 0.5 BDL REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) MCL (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (pg/1) BLANK RESULT (µg/I) Dioxin 1746-01-6 NT 0.00003 - - NT 2,4-D 94-75-7 BDL 70 515.1 0.43 BDL 2,4,5 -TP 93-72-1 BDL 50 515.1 0.24 BDL Alachlor 15972-60-8 BDL 2 507 0.36 BDL Atrazine 1912-24-9 BDL 3 507 0.34 BDL Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 BDL 0.2 525.2 0.2 BDL Carbofuran 1563-66-2 BDL 40 531.1 1.5 BDL Chlordane 57-74-9 BDL 2 508 0.5 BDL Dalapon 75-99-0 BDL 200 515.1 0.18 BDL Dibromochloropropane 96-12-8 BDL 0.2 504.1 0.05 BDL Dinoseb 85-85-7 BDL 7 515.1 0.37 BDL Diquat 85-00-7 BDL 20 549.1 0.44 BDL PAGE 2 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-7141-01 PWSID #: N/A REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's (CONT.) CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) MCL (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/1) BLANK RESULT (.tg/I) Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 103-23-1 BDL 400 525.2 0.5 BDL Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 BDL 6 525.2 0.5 BDL Endothall 145-73-3 BDL 100 548.1 10 BDL Endrin 72-20-8 BDL 2 508 0.5 BDL Ethylene dibromide 106-93-4 BDL 0.05 504.1 0.05 BDL Glyphosphate 1071-53-6 NT 700 -- BDL NT - Heptachlor 76-44-8 BDL 0.4 508 0.2 BDL Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 BDL 0.2 508 0.2 BDL - Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 BDL 1 508 0.5 BDL Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 BDL 50 508 0.5 BDL Lindane 58-89-9 BDL 0.2 508 O.? BDL Methoxychlor 72-43-5 BDL 40 508 0.5 BDL Oxamyl 23135-22-0 BDL 200 531.1 2 BDL Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 BDL 1 515.1 0.28 BDL Picloram 1918-02-1 BDL 500 515.1 0.21 BDL Polychlorinated biphenyls 1336-36-3 BDL 0.5 508 0.05 BDL Simazine 122-34-9 BDL 4 507 0.35 BDL Toxaphene 8001-35-2 BDL 3 508 0.5 BDL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-SOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (1L0) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran (Unk) BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldicarb 116-06-3 BDL 531.1 1 BDL Aldicarb sulfone 1646-87-4 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldicarb sulfoxide 1646-87-3 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Aldrin 309-00-2 BDL 508 0.5 BDL Butachlor 23814-66-9 BDL 507 0.53 BDL Carbaryl 63-25-2 BDL 531.1 2 BDL Dicamba 1989-00-9 BDL 515.1 0.24 BDL Dieldrin 60-57-1 BDL 508 0.5 BDL Methomyl 16752-77-5 BDL 531.1 0.5 BDL Metolachlor 51218-45-2 BDL 507 0.38 BDL Metribuzin 21087-64-9 BDL 507 0.38 BDL Propachlor 1918-16-7 BDL 507 1.1 BDL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/I) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (µg/I) 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL PAGE 3 LABORATORY NUMBER: 02-7141-01 PWSID #: N/A UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-VOC's (CONT.) CONTAMINANT CAS # RESULT (µg/1) EPA METHOD LAB MDL (µg/I) BLANK RESULT (µg/1) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3-Dichloropropene 542-75-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL - 2,2-Dichloropropane 590-20-7 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromobenzene 108-86-11 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Bromomethane 74-96-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chloroethane 75-00-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Chloromethane 74-87-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Dibromomethane 74-95-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Fluorotrichloromethane 75-69-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Hexachlorobutadiene 87-66-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Isopropylbenzene 98-82-2 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL m -Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Naphthalene 91-20-3 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL o-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL p-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL p-Isopropyltoluene 25155-15-1 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 BDL 524.2 0.5 BDL Codes used: NT = Not tested for compound. B = The analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. p.g/1 = Micrograms per liter. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was below the LAB MDL. LAB MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. 7rc-64A cA L N r of ec 7c(e Reviewed and approved by Title ate MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, WQCD-DW-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO, 80222-1530 PAGE 4 Form No. GWS -25 APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE TATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 243861 DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD Lot: Block: Filing: Subdiv: RANCH AT COULTER CREEK SNOWMASS LAND COMPANY P0BOX 6119 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615- (970) 923-2880 PERMIT TO CONSTRICT A ,WELL Northing: Easting: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(I) for uses as described in CRS 37-92-602(1)(f). Use of this well is limited to monitoring water levels andior water quality sampling. This well is known as the RCC Well No. 1. 4) This well must be equipped with a locking cap or seal to prevent well contamination or possible hazards as an open well. The well must be kept capped and locked at all times except during sampling or measuring. 5) Records of water level measurements and water quality analyses shall be maintained by the well owner and submitted to the Division of Water Resources upon request. 6) Upon conclusion of the monitoring program the well owner shall plug this well in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. A Well Abandonment Report must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources within 60 days of plugging. 7) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s) and name of aquifer as appropriate, and shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 8' This well must bP rnnstn,irteri by nr under the supervision of a licensed well driller or other authorized individual according to the Water Well Construction Rules. If non-standard construction is anticipated, a variance request must be submitted in accordance with Rule 18 and approved prior to well construction. 9) A Well Construction and Test Report (Form GWS -31), including lithologic log must be submitted by the individual authorized to construct the well. For non-standard construction, the report must include an as -built drawing showing details such as depth, casing, perforated zones, and a description of the grouting type and interval. 10) Pursuant to Rule 6.2.3 of the Water Well Construction Rules, the well construction contractor shall submit the as -built well location on work reports required by Rule 17.3 within 60 days of completion of the well. The measured location must be accurate to 200 feet of the actual location. The location information must include either the 1/4, 1/4, Section, Township, Range, and distances from section lines, or a GPS location pursuant to the Division of Water Resources' guidelines. APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 6 Township 7 S Range 87 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft. from Section Line Ft. from Section Line UTM COORDINATES NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2391-064-00-144 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R111514 (totaling 268.14 acres) o • APPROVED DMW • 1 StSte+Engineer no Receipt No. 9501278A DATE ISSUEItr 4 By EXPIRATION DATE