Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01.0 Applications• • s • Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plat SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM SUBDIVISION NAME: % ef{rki I-''X<fes;'' OWNER: 7 /4-7,7 Y/4'?. ,/ / 4 TD ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR: ,I 7 <:(��.. LOCATION: Section / g 52 Township 7 S Range WATER SOURCE: 4.1.,/`�E. <� - c'" �/% �� r. ,. SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: /A) j C‘ A -'L ri ,. `j"" f5 t -%-, PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: EXISTING ZONING: EASEMENTS: Utility Ditch FL. I / AJ E: D U Yi)�{ "L- e . z,. c, f rte? y ;� /0O / -/n �= TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residential Single Famiy Duplex Multi -family Mobile Home (2) Commercial (3) Industrial (4) Public/Quasi-Public (5) Open Space/Common Area TOTAL: PARKING SPACES: Residential Commercial Industrial Number .174 Acres /i7z-3,77 Co - 9 Floor Area Acres O sq.ft. d _Q sq.ft. O 774 -0 ic /Zo.4-o 1 //20 BG Lincoln DeVore 1000 West Fillmore St. Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 (303) 632-3593 Home Office Mr. John fluebinger c/o Ron Liston Land Design Partnership Village Plaza; Suite 208 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 July 18, 1978 Re: GENERAL 6 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 6 SOILS WESTBANK SUBDIVISION, FILING #2 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Gentleman: Transmitted herewith is a report concerning the general and engineering geology and soils of a proposed subdivision located at westbank tiling #2 in Garfield County, Colorado. This report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of Colorado Senate Bill #35 (30.28.133 C.R.S. 1973 as amended) and the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN DeVO TES LABORATORY � 1-.1/,i Hi al T, Weaver Engineering Geologist J seph R. Infasc•-' li Professional Geologist State of Colorado MEW 6 RLB/kste LDTL Job No. GS•754 2700 Highway 50 West Pueblo, Colo 81003 (303) 546-1150 P.O. Box 1427 Glenwood Springs, Colo 81601 (303) 945-6020 Robert L. Bass Civil/Engineer Ravi -amid) 1W -1444b47.7 E. 109 Rosemont Plaza Montrose, Colo 81401 (303) 249-7838 P.O. Box 1882 P.O. Box 1643 Grand Junction, Colo 81501 Rock Springs, Wyo 82901 (303) 242-8968 (307) 382-2649 ALMUSE: 110 • The contents of this report are a general and engineering geology and subsurface soils investigation and founda- tion recommendations for the second filing of an existing subdivision. W'estbank Subdivision Filing #2 consists of two terrace levels of the Roaring Fork River located on the west side of the Cattle Creek Diapiric Anticline, about 3 miles south of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The majority of the site is underlain by vertically dipping beds of the Eagle Valley Evaporate and in the southwest corner of the site inter• tongues with the red beds of the Maroon Formatiogivhich has resulted in a large landslide which is now fairly stable. Terrace gravels deposited on the evaporite beds ware tilted by hydration and expansion of the gypsum and created a depression which received fine-grained sediments to a consid- erable thickness. The majority of the development will be on this alluvial, colluvial and eolian material. Site specific studies are recommended for any construction on or near unstable or potentially unstable slopes. Read cuts and fills should be terraced, revegetated or retained to prevent erosion. No unusual hazard exists from seismic activity, radiation, or flooding. Gravel deposits within the subdivision may be used for fill and base course material. Generally, the structures in this development may be supported by typical shallow foundation systems cousisting of continuous foundations beneath bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath columna and other points of concentrated load. Bearing capacities were observed to vary substantially across the site, and therefore it is felt that bearing capacities for each structure can best be determined by -1. -10 inspection of ttopsn foundation excavation. Bearing capacity ranges for various soil types encountered in this subdivision are provided in the body of this report. The bottoms of foundations should be placed a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade, for frost protection. The foundation systems should be well balanced and heavily reinforced. Contact stresses beneath foundations should be balanced to within + 300 psf. Steuwalls should be designed as gradebsams capable of spanning at least 12 feet. Mere walls will retain soil in excess of 4 feat in height, vertical reinforcing should be designed, using an equivalent fluid pressure of 40 pcf. Backfill should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum Proctor dry density. The ground surface should be graded so that surface runoff is carried quickly away from structures. More complete recommendations can be found in the body of this report. All recommendations are subject to licdta- tions set forth herein. -2 i INTRODUCTION Personnel of Lincoln-DeVore have completed an investigation of the proposed Westbank Subdivision, Filing 2, located approximately 5 miles south of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, and a abort distance west of State Highway 82 and the Roaring Fork River. This Itract may generally be described as part of the Southwest quarter Section 1, and part of the Southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 ' ;gest, 6th P.M. It is proposed to develop 32 single family residences, eight 4-plex units, and three multi -family units, on approximately 300 acres. The proposed development lies on north facing slopes of two older alluvial terraces of the Roaring Fork ' River. Elevations within the property range from about 5950 to 6400 feet Above mean sea level. Slopes range from about 3! on the lover terrace to ' abort 70'i on the slops between the upper and lower terrace. Vegetation is sparse, with sagebrush predominant over the majority of the site. Some conifers are present along the lower slopes of the upper terrace level. The remainder of the vegetation is composed of dryland bunch grasses and other low herbals. The site is moderately dissected by several small inter- ' mittent stream gullies. Some of these gullies have "nick points" or places of vertical displacement up to 12 feet in height, which is an indicated of headward erosion within the gully. In regard to runoff, the upper soils are fairly clayey, and very little infiltration takes place. Shestwash predomi- nates on the upper level, but as the runoff waters in the gullies reaches the ' lower terrace level, infiltration becomes great. This tends to drastically reduce runoff to a level far below that which would normally be expected. ir 411 411 Previous land use in the vicinity had been limited to agricultural until recently. Now, the majority of the lower terrace level has been changed to residential and recreational ' use with the development of Westbank Subdivision Piling 1. QBNERAL AND ENGINEERING 0EOI0OGT ' The majority of the site is under- lain by the Pennsylvanian Age Eagle Valley Evaporate (Pev) (See Plate 1), ' which, at the surface is composed of massive, coarse to fine-grained, white ' to gray gypsum beds and widely spaced separate beds of calcareous sandstone and dark fissile shale. In the subsurface near Cattle Creek, the evaporate ' is composed of gray to brown anhydrite interbedded with light-colored silt - stone and sandstone and a few dark shale beds, to a depth of 2,125 feet. ' Below this level halite (rocksalt) is the principal rock (Mallory -1971). No halite was noted at the surface anywhere in the site area. Since its deposition, the Eagle Valley Evaporite has been subjected to several types of deformation, including, load metamorphism, orogenic movement, growth of diapiric anticlines, and ' local contortion due to flowage and hydration of anhydrite. These processes, discussed below, account for its present appearance. Calcium sulfate beds at a depth of ' more than several hundred feet are present as anhydrite. Originally, the salt deposited was gypsum, but metamorphism by elimination of water was probably effected by burial of thesalts by a great thickness of upper Pablo - " zoic and Mesozoic rocks. Major uplifts and tectonic movement during the Laramide Orogeny (mountain building processes) probably had 111 ' onlyinciduatal�ffect on the siferoua strataalong with other rocks of syp the stratigraphic section. The Cattle Creek diapiric anticline ' a regional structural feature is defined by vertically dipping sandstones ' and gypsum strata located in the eastern part of the site and a gentle east dip on the east side of the Roaring Fork River. A diapir is a ' structural phenomenon in which the weight of overlying rocks causes an upward displacement of the softer more plastic rocks, such as salt, toward ' the surface, where confining pressures are much leas. The vertical dip ' of the units underlying the site is attributed to vertical movement of the diapir and high confining pressure (Mallory, 1966). Since the calcium sulfate salts at depth are in the form of anhydrite, but in outcrop the salt is gypsum, ' there is little doubt that the gypsum at the surface resulted from hydra- "' ydra-' tion of the anhydrite by meteoric (surface) waters. The typical contorted structure in gypsum outcrops is attributed to expansion and internal pres- sure due to hydration of anhydrite to gypsum and flowage towards the valley caused by the weight of overburden on the valley sides. The amount of ' expansion which accompanies hydration is not accurately known, but seems to range from 30 to 58 percent of the original rock. The pressure exerted has been estimated at 300 to 10,000 pounds per square inch (Brune 1965). A paradox exists within the Eagle Valley Evaporite because the bold masses of gypsum rise abruptly above the ' alluvial valley floor. Ordinarily a soft, easily weathered, friable, and ' soluble rock in a well watered environment would be concealed by slides and slumps, talus and colluvium, and good exposures would be rare. The fact of their present prominence, however, seems to demand that upwelling and Ilk111 expansion are s 1 proceeding at a rate equal to or locally exceeding solution and erosion. Another fact that supports the concept of salt tectonism is that old river terraces which would normally dip slightly toward the river valley, do in fact, dip away from the valley. Near the center of the site by a newly constructed water tank, the dip of the terrace layers into the hillside was measured at 150. The Eagle Valley Evaporite inter - tongues with the Maroon Formation throughout the area. The Maroon Formation (Ptm)is a thick sequence of reddish interbedded sandstones, siltatones and shales of Pennsylvanian and Permian ages. Only a small part of the sequence is exposed on the upper slopes of the ridge in the southwest corner of the site. This intercalated or intertonguing condition with more resistant competent rocks overlying softer incompetent layers results in a very unstable situation. A large landslide (Q1so) has occurred in this intercalated area as a result of this condition. This mass movement of unconsolidated materials probably occurred in post -glacial times, when the climate was much wetter. This unit now is fairly stable due to natural cementation in the soil, but natural or man-made changes which significatnly increase the subsurface moisture could cause renobiliaation of this material. If construction is to take place on or near this material, site specific studies are recommended. Another small landslide (Qlsa) is present along the southern portion of the site, where a slump has occurred in the Eagle Vc11ey Evaporate and colluvial material overlying it. A scarp is still present at the head of the slump and "pistol- butting" of trees on the slope indicate active movement of the aurficial soil. Accelerated creep is also present on the colluvial slopes (Qc) at the bans of Eagle Valley Evaporite .6- I5 outcrops, and both est be considered unstable slopes. Construction on or near either of theee units should be avoided, or proceed only with detailed engineering investigations prior to construction. A thick sequence of alluvial gravels and sands (Qt2) was deposited on the vertically dipping beds of the Eagle Valley Evaporite which was truncated by the Roaring Fork River. This terrace deposit is more than 100 feet thick at its outer exposure nearest the river, but thins quickly as it tapers into the hillside. This upper terrace also grades into the younger, lower terrace (Qtl) as one proceeds westward. These terrace materials were only encountered in the test borings on the three multi-family unit lots on the lower terrace level. No river gravels were encountered on the upper terrace level where the majority of development is to take place, because of a complex unit which has been mapped as Qass. :alluvial, colluvial and eolian sand, silt and clay (Qass) is a complex unit: which started its development at the time the Roaring Fork River began downcutting from the upper layers of the upper terrace (Qt2). ,'.t that time a debris fan developed on the terrace gravels at the mouth of the large gully immediately east of the site. A remnant of that debris fan now forms the ridge along the east edge of the upper terrace level. As water caused the Eagle Valley Evaporite layers to swell and expand, tilting the terrace into the hillside, a depression was formed between tha base of the slope and the up-tilting terrace and debris fan. This depression continued to receive fine-grained materials from alluvial or water action, colluvial or gravity action, and eolian or wind- blown sand, silty and clay, until headward erosion by gullying breached the depression and developed the drainage pattern existing today. This unit appears to be quite thick in places but pinches out toward the river. Teat Boring No. 1 penetrated 45 feet of silty clay without encountertng any terrace 1 . • gravels or bedrock. This material is low to moderately expansive and is ' susceptible to surface erosion and subsurface piping. Construction acti- vities should be planned and executed so that no areas are stripped or cut ' unnecessarily, and so that no area of exposed soil, either in place or man ' made, remains unprotected from erosion. Road cuts and fills should be terraced, revegetated, or retained in such a way that water may quickly drain from the slopes without eroding them. In the developed areas, attention should bo given to the drainage, so that storm waters may likewise be ' removed from the site rapidly without causing damage. t. nick point present in the main bully on the site with a vertical displacement of about 12 feet should be protected by rip-rap or similar means to prevent further headword migration. Whenever a structure is built adjacent to a steep slope, Steps should be taken to prevent erosion in the area of the foundations. The other significant geomorphic landforms present on this site are coaleasing debris fans 01uf). These fans are minor depositional features which do not pose a significant hazard from mudflows or flooding. As mentioned earlier in the report, runoff on the upper level is greater than infiltration, but as the gullies reach the lower terrace ' materials, infiltration is great and a well-defined drainage channel does not exist. Because of the mode of deposition on these fans, a loose soil structure can develop which may be prone to hydro-compaction and/or consoli• dation if over loaded. ' The floodplain of the Roaring Fork River is well confined by the first terrace level which is approximately 40 feet above the level of the river. It is felt that this 40 foot difference in elevation between the river and the first terrace should provide sufficient portectioa during periods of flooding. The possible effects of laming by debris down- stream during extreme floods, however, cannot be determined and might possibly -8- ' 7j 411 effect the site at sometime. The upper terrace level can be considered free of flood hazard due to its height above the river. A minor rockfall hazard may exist in the southwestern portion of the site. but the largest boulder noted on the surface was about 2 feet in diameter and it did not roach the proposed lots in this area. Slopes on the Cagle Valley earaporite and the terrace gravels immediately overlying the degle Valley :svaporite oust be considered unstable, and therefore, deep cuts, or filla which load the slope, should be avoided. Again, protection from erosion must be maintained. Rutainine structures, or esbions may be necessary to support the proposed access road if deeply weathered gypsiferious mudstone or other incompetent materials are encountered. The proposed .•estbank II Subdivision lies in an area of slight regional seismic activity where shocks may achieve a Modified Mercalli (or MSK) intensity of VII, or a Richter magnitude of 5.0. This is considered the threshold for significantly damaging quakes. The City of Glenwood Springs experienced a shock of TISK intensity V in 1889. In the year 1967, when research was Lone on the problem, some 20 shocks of [ichter Magnitude 2.0 to 4.0 were epicentered in the vicinity of Baxter Mountain (about 12 wiles north of t.Nstbank), and another such shock was epicentered at the Harvey Cep Reservoir (:bout 20 miles went of eastbank). This last shock was believed to have been artificially induced by the presence of the reservoir. Other tremors have been recorded in the ,Aspen vicinity. .;pile this part of Colorado is not in an area of serious earthquake danger, a certain risk does exist in the area which meat be taken into consideration in the design of structures, embankments and cuts. It should be emphasized that this risk is by no means limited to this site, but is regional in nature. 0). 7/;' There is no real to believe that any unusual deee of risk is associated with this particular site. It is recommended, though, that structures be designed to withstand low magnitude earth accelerations. No known radiation hazard exists on this site. Radioactive minerals in Western Colorado generally occur in the Chinle and Morrison Formations, neither of which are found on or near this site. The nearest known location of radioactive deposits are found north of Rifle. Ccicrado. approximately 35 miles northwest of Westbank. A significant mineral resource exists on the site in the sands end gravels of the terrace deposits (Qt). This material has been worked in the past, as is evidenced by small pits at the mouths of two gullies in the center of the site. Considerable material was removed. reworked and relocated in this area, and has been sapped in our report as man-made fill (Qf1). This fill material should be considered in a low density state and unacceptable for foundations or other construction without being removed and recomp acted. while there will be a heavy demand for aggregate in the Roaring Fork Valley through the remainder of this century, it is believed that withdrawal of this deposit will not significantly affect the regional aggregate supply. Furthermore, given the existing housing shortage in the Glenwood Springs area, it is believed that the value of Westbank 11 as a residential district far out weighs its potential value as an aggregate resource. Some of this sand and gravel may be useful as embankment and base course material within the development itself. It is the Laboratory's understanding the sewage disposal will be accomplished through a central system associated with the first filing at Westbank. water supply will also be provided by X10• 77 ' . • wells in the first filing. Tests should be performed on these wells, ' if they have not been already, to determine if the water supply is adequate for the proposed use and to assess its dependability. ' AORINGS, L/BQR=ttY TESTS # p,E; plaS s Ten test borings were drilled across ' the site, as shown on the attached Test Boring Location e1agran. These borings were placed in such a manner as to obtain a reasonably good profile ' of the subsurface soils. :►11 borings were drilled with a power -driven, con tinuous auger drill. t3.,amples were taken with the standard split•spoon sampler, and by bulk methods. TT.+o general soil profiles were ' encountered in the test borings. The first general soil profile, encountered in Borings 1 through 7. consisted of alluvial and colluvial sand, silt and clay. This material, described in a previous section of this report, has been mapped geologically as +bass. This deposit is characterized by its variability, but was encountered as silty and sandy clays in our test ' borings. Gravel and sand lenses were encountered throughout the soil pro., file, as well as generally scattered gravel sized particles. The second general soil profile, encountered in Borings 8 through 10, consisted of a river terrace deposit overlain by clay and silty clay materials. The terrace material, which was tdeposited by the action of the Roaring Fork River in the past, can be described as a silty sand matrix surrounding gravel, cobbles, and boulders. 'The deposit increases in dee,sity and particle size with depth; and refusal on tightly nested cobbles was encountered in Borings 3, 9, and 10, at the depths shown on the drilling logs. li layer of man-made fill approximately 3 feet in thickness was encountered in the vicinity of Test Boring No. 8. ' •11- �U� 1 • • The samples obtained during our field exploration program have been divided into four soil types. More precise engineering characteristics of these soil types are provided on the attached ' summary sheets. The following discussion will be general in nature. y � ' Soil Type No. 1 classified as a lean clay (CL) of fine grain size. This material is plastic, of low permeability, and of moderate to high density. In a relatively dry, dense condition, ' this material will have a tendency to expand upon the addition of moisture, with expansion pressures on the order of 700 psf being measured. This material has a tendency to consolidate under applied load. To minimize the effects of expansion or consolidation, we recommend careful balancing ' and reinforcing of the various foundation components. If foundations are ' placed in this material, they may be proportioned on the basis of a pre.. lininary bearing capacity of 4000 psf, with a minimum design pressure. of ' 700 psf being maintained at atl-times. It should be noted that this is a preliminary value which should be verified by inspection of the open founds- ' cion excavation. roil Type No. 1 contains sulfates in detrimental quantities. ' Soil Type No. 2 classified as a silty clay (::L/Ml.) of fine grain size. This material is slightly plastic, of low permeability, ani was encountered in a variable density condition. This soil will have very little tendency to expand upon the addition of ' moisture. It will. however have a tendency to consolidate upon loading, expecially where it exists in a low density state. For this reason the foundation systems placed in this material should be properly balanced and reinforced, and allowable bearing capacity values should not be exceeded. Soil Type No. 2 was found to have a maximum allowable bearing capacity ranging from 1000 to 3000 psf. The precise bearing value should be determined at 1 -12- the time of the open foundation excavation inspection. Soil Type No. 2 ' contains sulfates in detrimental quantities. Soil Type No. 3 classified as a lean ' clay (CL) with considerable sand sized material. Tis soil type is plastic, ' of low permeability and was encountered in a moderate to high density condi- tion. Soil 'type No. 3 will have a slight tendency to expand upon the addition ' of moisture, with swell pressures on the order of 350 psf being anticipated. IL will also have a slight tendency to consolidate under load. Due to the ' expansion and consolidation characteristics of this soil, balancing ' and reinforcing recommendations are considered important. Foundations placed in this material may be proportioned on the basis of a preliminary allowable ' bearing capacity of 4000 psf, with a minimum required dead load pressure ' of 350 psf. This value should be verified by inspection. Soil Type No. 3 contains sulfates in detrimental quantities. ' Soil Type No. 4 classified as a silty sand (SM) of coarse grain size. This soil type was noted to contain numerous ' cobble and gravel sized particles, as well as layers of fins silt'and clay ' sized material. Tis material was encountered in the lower portion of test borings G, 9, and 10. Ln general, this soil is nonplastic, of medium to ' high permeability, and of medium to high density. These granular materials will have virtually no tendency to expand upon the addition of moisture nor ' to long; term consolidation eider applied foundation stresses. ilewever. they ' do have a tendency to settle under the initial application of the foundation stresses. This settlement should be furily rapid in nature, and should be virtually complete by the end of construction. Judging from the initial density of the soil, L+4 would anticipate very little differential movement. This is particularly true if the allowable bearing values given in this report are not exceeded and if recommendations pertaining to reinforcing and ' `a 10 410balancing are followed. Soil Type No. 4 was found to have an allowable bearing capacity on the order of 4000 psf maximum, as an overall site average. These granular materials were found to be relatively free of pule fates. No free water was encountered in any of the test borings placed on this site. Free water is believed to be fairly deep in this area, and should not affect the proposed foundations. Certain areas of the subdivision, however, due to topography and soil conditions, may be susceptible to subsurface seepage. For this reason, subsurface peripheral drains ray bo necessary around soma of the structures. The necessary drainage measures nor each building lot can be established at the time of the open foundation excavation inspection. FOUNDATION RECO 'NO^TIONS: The Laboratory has not at this time seen a set of construction drawings for the proposed structures. It is our understanding, however, that the structures will be single and multiple family residential units of conventional design, and foundation loads will be light to moderate in magnitude. ny special loads or unusual design conditions should be reported to the Laboratory so that changes in recome mandation may be made if necessary. However, based on soil conditions and project characteristics previously outlined, the following recommendations are made. It is our recommendation that shallow foundation systems consisting of continuous foundations beneath bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath columns and other points of concentrated load be used to carry the weight of the proposed structures. The bearing capacity of the roils, as discussed in the previous section, were observed to range from 1000 to 4000 psf, depending upon soil type and location. Similarly, minimum design pressure values to counteract expansion were noted to range from 0 to 700 psf. Because of this variance in values, it is not possible to give precise bearing capacities for the site in general. Rather, it is suggested that bearing values for each individual site be established by inspection of the open foundation excavation. The bottoms of foundations should be placed. a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade, or as dictated by local building codes, for frost protection. Due to the consolidation and expansion potential of some of the soils encountered on the site, as well as the possibility of founding a single structure on two dissimilar materials, it must be recommended that the foundation systems be balanced to lower the possibility of differential movement. The structures should be balanced so that the total load on the soil is approximately the same throughout the entire structure. This can be accomplished by placing narrow footings beneath lightly loaded walls and wider footings beneath more heavily loaded walls. If the building is to be a single story structure with no basement, balancing should be accomplished using the deed load only. However, if the structure is to have a basement or to be multi-storied, balance should be accomplished using the dead load plus approximately one-half of the live load. Using c:hichever criteria is applicable, the building should be balanced so that the total load along all bearing; walls is within -! 300 psf at all points. Isolated interior column pads should be designed for unit loads of approxi.. mately 200 psf greater than the average selected for the exterior valls. In order to make the structure somewhat more rigid and to spread the loads more evenly around the building, it is recommended that all stem walls of the structure be designed as grade beaus capable of spanning at least 12 feet. Horizontal reinforcement should be -15- 1 placed continudialy around the structure with ngaps yr breaks in the reinforcing steel unless they are specially designed. Beams should be reinforced at both top and bottom, with the majority of the reinforcement being placed near the bottom. ;;here foundation walls will retain soil in. excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing should be designed, based on an equivalent fluid pressure of 40 pcf for the soil in the active state. Floor slabs may be placed directly on grade or over a compacted gravel blanket of 4 to 6 inches in thickness. If the gravel bed is chosen, it must be provided with a free drainage out• let to the surface and must not be allowed to act as a water trap beneath the floor slab. Floor slabs should be constructed so as to act independently of other structural portions of the building. Concrete slabs should be placed in sections no greater than 25 feet on a side. Jtep construction or contraction joints could be placed at these lines to facilitate even breakage. This will help reduce to a minimum any unsightly cracking which could be caused by differential movement. To aid in the rapidity of runoff and to make the structure somewhat more rigid, backfill around the structure and in utility trenches leading to the structure should be compacted to at least 907. of maximum Proctor ary density, :6TF -693. The native materials found on the situ may be used for this backfill provided material larger than v inches in diameter is first removed. Material should be placed in lifts not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness at a moisture content approximately equal to the Proctor optimum moisture content, plus or minus 21. Backfill should be compacted to the required density by mechanical means. '• should • ement No Nater flooding techniques of any type • oul used in th be s plat of fill on this site. The use oflribratory compaction equipment may facilitate the compaction of backfill where granular soil types are used. ' A sizeable area of man -wade fill exists ' in the vicinity of Test Boring No. 89 which is shown on Plate 1 as Qfl. Where buildings will rest in this material, the fill should be removed and ' replaced with suitable material compacted to at least 95'% of the maximum Proctor dry density, ASTM 0-698. Additionally, any fill, debris, organic ' topsoil, or otherwise unsuitable material encountered in areas of proposed ' construction should be removed and replaced with suitable fill compacted as specified above. tThe open foundation excavation should be inspected prior to the construction of forme or placement of concrete to ' establish the required design criteria and ensure that no debris, soft spots, ' or areas of unusually low density are located within the footing region. The ground surface around the structure ' should be graded so that surface runoff is carried quickly away from the building. Minimum gradient within 10 feet of the structure will depend upon surface landscaping. Bare or paved areas should maintain a minimum gradient ' of 17. within the 10 feet immediately adjacent the structure, while all land- scaped areas should maintain a minimum gradient of 5%. Roof drains must be ' carried across all backfilled regions and discharged well away from the structure. The fine grained soils encountered on the site were found to contain detrimental quantities of sulfates. Therefore, a Type II Modified Cement is recommended in all concrete which will be in contact with the soils. Under no circumstances should calcium chloride ever be added to a Type II Cement. ' -17- ii` • • It isd that believe all pertinent I - points concerning the subsurface soils on this site have been covered in this report. If soil types and conditions other than those outlined herein Iare noted during construction on the site, these should ba reported to the Laboratory so that changes in recommendations can be made, if these are I necessa arise necessary. If questions ns ris or further information is required, please II feel free to contact the Laboratory. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Li. Bass, N.W., and Northrop, S. A., 1963, Geology of Glenwood Springs ' Quadrangle and Vicinity, Northwestern Colorado: U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1142-J, 74 pp. ' 2. Mallory, W. W., 1966, Cattle Creek anticline, a Balt diapir near Glen- wood Springs, Colorado, in Geological Survey Research 1966: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 550-B, p. B12 -B15. ' 3. Mallory, W. W., 1971, The Eagle Valley Evaporite, Northwest Colorado - A Regional Synthesis: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1311-E, 37 pp. ' 4. Simon, R. B., 1972, Seismicity, in Geologic Atlas of the Rocky Mountain Region: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, ' pp. 48-51. 5. Brune, Gunnar, 1965, Anhydrite and Gypsum Problems in Engineering: Engineering Geology, V. 2, No. 1, p. 26-38. -19- 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SOILS DESCRIPTIONS: • ROCK DESCRIPTIONS' YMBOLS a NOTES: SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL USCS DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION .p•:p•po SEDIMENTARY ROCKS 7r/ -x.-/ Topsoil •o .;; CONGLOMERATE 9/12 Standard penetration drive Man-made Fill SANDSTONE Numbers indicate 9 blows to drive the spoon 12" into ground. 0 o.o:o. 0.00 00 GW Well graded Gravel --__ - SILTSTONE ST 2-1/2" Shelby thin wall sample o:o:ao 0000 °0°0°000 GP Poorly -graded Gravel ---_ =__= --- SHALE 0000 pl %o0 /00 0 ° GM Silty Gravel GC Clayey Gravel x x X x x x CLAYSTONE COAL Free Wo Natural Moisture Content Wx Weathered Materiol 1 t ♦ water Free water table SW Well graded Sand i i LIMESTONE 11 / r dry density SP Poorly -graded Sana / / DOLOMITE Yo Natural 1 / 1/ I 11 [11 SM SiltySand i MARLSTONE T.B.—Disturbed Bulk Sample 1 1 1 /// l//Tile ,��/� SC Clayey Sand ,�llll, GYPSUM ® Soil type related to samples 1in ML Low -plasticity Silt rt Other Sedimentary Rocks report /.`/1/1rtcNEo�t�+oct<� 15' Wx Top of formation CL Low -plasticity Clay ii n \\ / ;v— GRANITIC ROCKS Form. j +++ Organic DIORITIC ROCKS Test Boring Location f OL Low -plasticity + +++ Silt Clay I � and MH High plasticity Silt ,li :d• �); // GABBRO m Test Pit Location CH High -plasticity Clay RHYOLITE 1---/X----1 Seismic or Resistivity Station. f —7L— -T7- OH High- plasticity Organic Clay ' ' ANDESITE Lineation indicates approx. length orientation of spread (S= Seismic , R= Resistivity ) tU_�LL 11 .m' Pt Peat BASALT GW/GM Well -graded Gravel, Silty e°"D° 0.0�: .000Qo TUFF & ASH FLOWS Standard Penetration Drives are made by driving a standard 1.4" split spoon ° �° ° o 0 • o GW/GC Well -graded Gravel, Clayey G. o .:�a' •��'O' BRECCIA SiOther Volcanics sampler into the ground by dropping a laolb. weight 30". ASTM test des. D-1586. 00 0pc0o OO`"'I0 GP/GM PPoorly- graded Gravel, o Silty r-4^' 4 Other Igneous Rocks Samples may be bulk, standard split disturbed) 2-i/2" I. D. ,5 N1 METAMORPHIC ROCKS spoon (both or • 0 0° 3c GP/GC Poorly -graded Gravel, °° Clayey J11 --/, ;/', GNEISS thin wall ("undisturbed") Shelby tube samples. See log for type. 0 1° 0 GM/GC Silty Gravel, Clayey ���� SCHIST The boring logs show subsurface conditions at the dates and locutions shown ,and it is o GC/GM Clayey Gravel , Silty PHYLLITE not warranted that they are representative of subsurface conditions at other locations SW/SM Well - graded Sand, Silty V SLATE and times. :• '•:' SW/SC Well- graded Sand, Clayey .�j. ` METAQUARTZITE 000 I SP/SM Sand, �u, 0Poorly-graded 00 MARBLE Silty 000 SP/SC Poorly- graded Sand, Clayey 177 ;I/ i",', HORNFELS III 1 SM/SC Silty Sand, Clayey e 1 SERPENTINE Clayey Sand, SiltyL itSC/SM Other Metamorphic Rocks /CL/ML Silty Clay D LINCOLN TESTING COLORADO Colorado Springs, Pueblo, Glenwood Springs, Montrose, Gunnison, Grand Junction.— WYO.— Rock Springs EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS LABORATORY r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ti1 v:Hole No. T Elevation 15 2 • 3 Z 2 0 CL/AIL C4y. 25 30 /y/iz x••9.8 0 Iz 4.9.0 0 35 40 T /i/ 7J4 4¢ DRILLING LOGS • • 411. • Si/'i/ Ch% 4. So�1 Low S..//arias A//z F,*7.(0 0 0 0 CL � Liman C/ay. •/ SaPI 5,-oc../n, 51/9h71// /moo/S7 Same. 2 0 9//Z 7-71 r 34/is L6,/•/o. 0 15 3O//Z `"020 LINCOLN DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS -PUEBLO, COLORADO 30 35 40 J� • i t i Hole No Elevation CL 10 15 Z20 25 30 35 40 cLAYL s; Aix Cady, Trdu Ste./!ifcs 6. 7 / 4/iZ , 9.i O 3Z/i2 .wos9.8 0 DRILLING LOGS S 1 CL L can f""m LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS -PUEBLO, COLORADO li 9/ I I Too Tod E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 z0 15 W UJ 20 w 1 25 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 35 40 7 B DRILLING LOGS LINCOLN-DrVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS -PUEBLO, COLORADO CLV/V.Z Sii/y C/ay /1y/4,// /kk, Sandy, "� 5c �/TCiI.1 S,//®Ars — G L_ mar L./...,x,v �`.,, s®..d,,, 5II; rte/ a.. 5 u/�yedS, o r.5.‘,/,!..).-- ' _ .a., C /L Ag.//L .✓ =6.8 + 341,E = s o 0 ' S f f \1 I I 1 1 1Sd.,�y, I ti, I1 1 I 1 X L .l I 14 1 � O : 6 z 3 9 ® ¢O / 2 ,•3-‘ ® CAL mar► c%y, '!-y 5_ {�J✓ cY1 C,rS ...5-.../r...”4"1- S/ //y .xd, C's' -3 .e,• ,t/".•.do- 0,"5" r C�66/aS .4"...c.,..-5...,/ ,mss f� �o66/.S CL //yL S,/�y C/�yi .s/,y%/./>,, Tice G-��/ 5 �,,<.�/.s .5_,..„ s,i/y �, / ` Gi/'S� 5,-..,,,,r/ t 4-6.66.44. ,ver. 4ed Ca 664.3 I 1 �'d 1 o I' 1 f I DRILLING LOGS LINCOLN-DrVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS -PUEBLO, COLORADO TeL.t tick No. Top Elevation S.//y clay /ly 5..e rte, 5 —6 --"ave./ c44.6./es Ars fed C�66/e•S 10 — /0 fI t 1 DRILLING LOGS LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS -PUEBLO, COLORADO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Soil Sample___ • C. • SUMMARY SH; ET Location 2 Boring No. / Depth 25 Sample No Natural Water Content (w) Specifit-. Gravity (Gs) SIEVE ANALYSIS: Sieve 1'k, . 1 1/2" 1'_ 3/4" 1/2" 4_ 10___ 20 40 100 200 ^ 99. 4, 99. L 98.4 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS Grain size (mm) .OZ OCs 972 93. 7 85. 7 % alp . 7 /9.S Test No. D,..; r 0 7 /Z77B Ge6 In 'I::: )•nsity (To) pcf Plastic Limit P.L. /74% Liquid Limit L. L. 3 'S % r Icsticity Index P.I. /1. % Shrinkage Limit /2 °%o Now Index ;-inkage Ratio Vo; umetri c Change Lineal Shrinkage MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD Optimum Moisture Content Maximum Dry Density -rd California Bearing Rath. (a ) Swell- / Days Swell ogainst 72psf Wo gain. /f-3 % wo_ % pcf 0 2-9 BEARING: Housel Penetrometer (av) 4000 Unconfined Compression (qui Plate -Bearing• Inches Settlement Consolidation PERMEABILITY: uncle psf p;f psf psf K (at 20°C) Void Ratio Sulfates dooc�' ppm . SOIL ANALYSIS LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 1 1 1 1 Soil Sample Location Boring No. Sample No SUMMARY SHi ET Depth Natural Water Content (w)._(¢ 8.---% Specifit. Gravity (Gs)_ 1 1 1 1 1 . oos /7. 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 Test No. Dar,' Te - G5— 7S¢ 7/d/ 7e � EG Irl 'lc�. « n ity (Tc) pcf SIEVE ANALYSIS: Sieve No. P-;ssi ng 1 1/2" 1" 3/4„ 1/2" 4 10 20 40 100 200 99.9 99. 7 98.3 90•(0 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS - Grain size (mm) 78. 7 % oL 37.4 SOIL ANALYSIS Plastic Lirnit P.L. X7.9 o/0 Liquid Limit L. L. 23.9 0 ':.city Index P.I. C9.0 % Shrinkage Limit i-7.� % Flc'.v Index Shrinkage Ratio Volumetric Change % Lineal Shrinkage % MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD Optimum Moisture Content wo___._ o Maximum Dry Density -Td pcf California Bearing Ratio (a ) Swell- / J)a}s o.8 % Swell against X99 psf Wo gain. /78 % BEARING: Housel Penetrometer (av) ¢��� psf Unconfined Compression (qui _--psf Plate Bearing: psf Inches Settlement Consolidation % unde psf PERMEABILITY: K (at 20°C, Void Ratio_ Sulfafi s isoo` ppm. LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO • 1 SUMMARY SI -L ET Soil Sample CL 5a,z9/ Test No. GS- 754 Lccction____ 4. -/es cg,7h 11 : j 7/2/78 Boring No. _ _Depth /Q Sample No. 3 Te'+ GEG Natural Water Content (w) a• 7 °i° SpecifiL Gravity (Gs) In Hoc )rnsity (To) pcf SIEVE ANALYSIS: Sieve No. P. sing 1 1/2"_ 111 3/4" 1/2" 1/2" 4 10 20 /00 92.1, 6.. 82.7 7G. 6 40 100 200 9 8 6/. 5 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS - C -rain size (mm) 02 26s..S . oos i.5. Plastic Limit P.L, /G.7 % Liquid Limit L. L. eco.l, °i0 iii ."ticity Index P.I . 29 % Shrinkage Limit is.o % How Index Shrinkage Ratio 0/0 VQiulmetric Change 0/ Lineal Shrinkage 0/0 MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD Optimum Moisture Content wo__ °fo tvlaxi mum Dry Density -Td pcf California Bearing Ratio (a•) Swell- / Days /. % Swell against 3 '9 psf Wo gain_X6 9°0 BEARING: House!! Penetrometer (av) ••`000 psf Unconfined Compression (qu) psf Plate Bearing• psf Inches Settlement Consolidation °/0 unde psf PERMEABILITY: K (at 20°C) Void Ratio Sulfates 2000' ppm. SOIL ANALYSIS LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO ..........•••••••••11111•1•111••••••••••[.... Soil Sample A! Project 4/4,51'4a Sample Location 7-.5% FINER BY WEIGIrT 100 90 60 70 60 50 30 a 20 10 Test No. 65- 751 Date Test by GZ-76- ....•••••••=on•IWIIP.* GRAVEL Cour 1 Fine ND Co. 1 Fin 1 100 11/2 - '74 11 4.4.4 LT TO CLAY Nonplastic to Plastic • -1 1 -5.11 D ame er- (4 ) 410 20 440 #1a- #200 - Sieve No. Sample No. Specific Gravity Moisture Content Effective Size Cu Cc Fineness Modulus__ L.L.1' I /1,2 BEAP1NG o0 ptif GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 41WINK.V.IMEMPOROMIN•lial•IMAINIMM•or • 01 % Passing 1 1/2" 1" /00 3/ 4" 90.6 1/2" 879 3/8" 749.z 4 10 20 40 100 200 24.0 .0200 /49-0 3.8 AO./ 38. 4( .005. S all rates /000 PI= LINCOLN-DsVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO ?-7 1 • 4 1 1 August 30, 1979 1 Board of County Commissioners 1 Garfield County, Colorado P. 0. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 IIRe: Hillview P.U.D. Application Gentlemen: 1 I present herewith the materials in support of a P.U.D. applica- tion and preliminary plan for the Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4, II and request your consideration and ultimate approval of the P.U.D. On behalf of myself and the design team which has assisted in the II preparation of this information, I offer our full cooperation to you and the County staff in processing the application. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 1 Sincerely, 1 John Huebinger 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NK RANCH FILING NO. 4 1 • A .l" • . • .... • • . .. ' . , -THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES FORMAL APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLATTING OF 267 ACRES - III • 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I WESTBANK RANCH FILING NO. 4 1 APPLICATION 1 FOR SUBDIVISION PLATTING 1 1 I SEPTEMBER 4, 1979 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1 ICONSULTANTS: 1 Centennial Engineering, Inc. Land Design Partnership James M. Larson, Atty. I Ray D. Walker, P.E. Lincoln Devore Testing Laboratory David W. Hubly, Associate Professor 1 410 il • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1 Application for Subdivision Platting 1 IIFiling No. 4 Layout Map 2 Developer Intent 3 1 Architectural Control 4 1 Site Description 5 Legal Description 6 IIRegional Map 11 Legal Access 12 1 Political Jurisdiction 12 II Police and Fire Protection 12 Adjacent Land Ownership 12 IIMineral Rights 19 Water Rights 19 1 Existing Easements and Restrictions 29 1 Climate 30 History and Archaeology 32 IIWildlife 32 Utilities 35 1 Development Impact 47 I Development Phasing 49 Development Financing 50 IIImprovements Cost Estimate 51 Subdivision Summary 52 1 Drainage Report 53 II Soils & Geology Report 69 NM NM 1 N MN 111111 11111 NE N EN 11111 NM 1 MN 1 1 V NEI WESTBANK RANCH FILING NO. 4 (P.U.D.) 167 11.1111. . anlnuR =.. ., ..« •V•i• ••AM .13 fen • 10 41• a-r....a sora+I• MAO `•`i.• ow. o yR 1...y•..1, w• MAW I.aw �O II, 11•1•11 foW r, r r n •• Ira e•e .r.r«r �..•yl.r. .. :111"4.7= ...e.1741Z7Z7V4`p : w r•....•li.«i r R«a it s"Ir�. •� Win, N• r rry a.•.., «. «.•.1..•• wl.... LNG Y a•ra 4.4 IMY' OWv'Y' no WV 1, misir ist.S• 'r +••r .v.. 111. r• ow, w.••••r M. I. gTWilt as:• Tesr wr117.1.11r1. aw. _ w.. ▪ r r -. .14 111711..11 1 SW : ▪ arla,ie r zj'-Ar—• .•saa • 1 n .ice •..n••I MTV., ry ...M1 1.4.4.114 •y �vwt.r•• wo• �1...1 1• • M r . es wweralt 744.. ••�r` 1yr. • rpm.. rwow .4 �•y .. an. • Okay SEP 1.111.1 0111 P.S • 1� vaRr•Vc W. l... •« 4. 4 o «..•f .r •Y.L••4 Ir. r .11 Y ompool to. Pin 1•1411.11.1 Is .•Y •Iwr• • ... « .144 Sola. iYi s •• w i to Wks ofr`w 14 waVr W . IP r 1.1 a• .0.14 •••• •.. Y r *worm .14 i••Y Y•.•II 4 at1. M 4s •• mot. 414.0•11 towe .•. 4.41.r r r.•..ar .�.e r1rr�• low « r.lw•. 1 • • 1 DEVELOPER INTENT It is the intent of the developer to develop Westbank II as an overall residential community which can provide for both the residential and recreational needs of the II surrounding residents. Since the development abutts County Road 109, access to the site and its facilities II is insured. IIThe developer intends to develop all tracts. Developed I tracts will then be sold to builders IIWestbank Ranch consists of two distinct residential areas; a bottomland single family area, and an elevated bench- ' land single and multi -family area. These areas are II abutted by large open space acreages in a way that will assure continuity of the general character of existing IIWestbank Ranch developments. The compatibility among the different tracts within Westbank Ranch will enhance the theme Iof an overall community creating a pleasing environment in II which to live and play. IIThe goal of the developer is to coordinate the development of Westbank Ranch in an attractive and logical manner 1 which includes at least the following criteria: II 1. Minimizing the development impact upon Garfield County. 1 • III il2. Minimizing environmental impact due II to development. 3. Developing a pleasing architectural 1 character. 1 4. Providing a suitable environment where one can live and play in close proximity. 1 Certain concepts were accepted before the initial planning 1 phase began, as a means to guide the development in its 1 goals, to insure compatibility with the goals of Garfield County. 1 1 ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL Westbank Ranch will be a couuliunity where various archi- 1 tectural styles will come together. So that one designer's efforts are not devalued by unpredictable design of a 1 neighbor, the developer will establish an architectural II control committee to approve each project. Architectural control of the project shall remain the responsibility of IIthe developer until the general character of the development of any given parcel has been set. At such time, the responsi- 1 bility of continuity of architectural control will be per- tmanently vested in one or more Homeowners Associations. Those associations will be independently incorporated and IIgoverned by articles, by laws and covenants running with the land, all of which will be submitted at the time of final 1 platting of each tract. 1 • • 1 SITE DESCRIPTION IIWestbank Ranch is a 526 acre parcel of land located in Section 35 and Section 36, Township 6 South, Range 89 IIWest; and Section 1 and Section 2, Township 7 South, Range II 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. The site is bounded on the north by the Roaring IFork River; on the east by County Road 109; on the south by the south line of Government Lots 24, 21, 22, 16, 8 and II5; and on the west by the west line of Government Lots 22, I 18, 16, 8 and 5. Through the years the area has been pri- marily agricultural with occasional farmhouses scattered II along the bottomlands of the Roaring Fork River. Most land use changes in the area have taken place since 1972 at which IItime agricultural uses began to give way to low density 1 residential use. Topography at the site is that of three distinct configurations: A moderately sloping lowland flood II plain terrace primarily of very coarse gravel currently fully vegetated with domestic grasses; a steeply sloping erosion IIzone visible as the slough edge of a lateral terrace sparsely Ivegetated with evergreen species, sagebrush, and native grasses, and composed of well rounded very coarse to fine II gravel; and an upland benched area of sand and clay material to several feet depth, well vegetated with sagebrush and II native grasses. 1 1 1 . • 1 The proposed Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4 is adjacent to previous Filing No. 2 recorded at Plat Book 3, Page 85, and Filing No. 3 recorded at Plat Book 3, Page 122. This submittal consists of residential areas located in the most 1 southerly portion of the site. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 WESTBANK RANCH: 1 (QT7f#c)) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION PUBLIC OPEN SPACE A tract of land located in Section 1 and Section 2, Township 7 South, and Section 35, Township 6 South, all in Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the northwest corner of Section 1, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian bears N 200 00' 58" W 1523.284 feet, and being the southeast corner of Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 3, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; thence S 19° 41' 00" E 196.78 feet; thence S 34° 08' 00" E 283.00 feet; thence S 52° 22' 00" E 706.00 feet; thence S 32° 58' 00" E 582.00 feet; thence S 440 29' 00" E 406.00 feet to the east line of Lot 24; thence southerly along the east line of Lot 24 to the southeast corner of said Lot 24; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 24 to the southeast corner of Lot 25; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 25 to the northeast corner of Lot 21; thence southerly along the east line of Lot 21 to the southeast corner of said Lot 21; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 21 to the southeast corner of Lot 22; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 22 to the southwest corner of said Lot 22; thence northerly along the west line of Lot 22 to the southwest corner of Lot 18; thence northerly along the west line of Lot 18 to the southeast corner of Lot 16; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 16 to the southwest corner of said Lot 16; thence northerly along the west line of Lot 16 to the southeast corner of Lot 8; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 8 to the southwest corner of said Lot 8; thence northerly along the west line of Lot 8 to the south line of Lot 5; thence westerly along the south line of Lot 5 to the southwest corner of said Lot 5; thence northerly along the west line of Lot 5 to the north line of Section 2, Township 7 South Range 89 West; thence westerly along the north line of said Section 2 to the southwest corner of Lot 15, Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian; thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 15 to the southwest corner of Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 1, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; thence N 77° 39' 00" E 112.73 feet; thence N 63° 09' 52" E 159.87 feet; thence S 350 32' 48" E 210.99 feet; thence S 31° 43 thence S 69° 27 thence S 28° 57 thence N 86° 03 thence S 45° 23 thence S 05° 23 thence S 61° 18 thence S 28° 07 thence N 60° 30 thence S 37° 06 thence S 79° 17 ' 00" W ' 00" E ' 00" W ' 00" E ' 00" E ' 20" W 75.00 feet; 130.00 feet; 160.00 feet; 190.00 feet; 130.00 feet; 300.15 feet; ' 14" E 231.81 feet; ' 00" E 160.00 feet; ' 00" E 78.00 feet; ' 00" E 55.45 feet; ' 00" E 492.88 feet; thence N 26° 07' 29" E 82.61 feet to the Lot 1 of Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 2, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; southwest corner of _j thence alongthe southerlyboundaryline of said Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 2 the following courses: ' S 64° 37' 00" E 336.67 feet; thence S 69° 29' 00" E 390.82 feet; thence S 81° 03' 00" E 358.60 feet; thence N 89° 22' 00" E 342.78 feet; thence S 78° 00' 00" E 349.80 feet; thence N 87° 02' 00" E 374.60 feet to the southwest corner of ' Lot 1 of Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 3, County of Garfield, State of Colorado; thence along the southerly boundary line of said Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 3 the following courses: ' S 88° 23' 00" E 626.00 feet; thence S 76° 37' 00" E 39.95 feet; thence S 50° 31' 33" E 298.72 feet; ' thence N 61° 40' 41" E 339.92 feet; thence S 50° 00' 00" E 25.74 feet; thence 303.16 feet along the arc of a 329.13 foot radius curve ' to the left which arc subtends a chord bearing S 76° 23' 15" E 292.56 feet; thence 65.26 feet along the arc of a 45.00 foot radius curve to the right which subtends a chord bearing S 61° 13' 45" E 59.69 ' feet to the point of beginning; and containing 267.1 acres more or less; EXCEPT for Tract A, Tract B, and Tract C described as follows: TRACT A Beginning at a point whence the northeast corner of Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West Of the Sixth Principal Meridian bears N 390 12' 47" E 1628.29 feet; thence S 88° 23' 00" E 626.00 feet; thence S 76° 37' 00" E 39.95 feet; thence S 50° 31' 33" E 298.72 feet; thence N 61° 40' 41" E 339.92 feet; thence S 50° 00' 00" E 25.74 feet; thence 303.16 feet along a curve to the left having a radius of 329.13 feet and whose chord bears S 76° 23' 15" E 292.56 feet; thence 65.26 feet along a curve to the right having a radius of 45.00 feet and whose chord bears S 61° 13' 45" E 59.69 feet; thence S 19° 41' 00" E 196.78 feet; thence S 340 08' 00" E 100.14 feet; thence S 31° 47' 24" W 128.73 feet; thence 368.46 feet along a curve to the right having a radius of 330 feet and whose chord bears S 62° 59' 12" W 349.61 feet; thence N 85° 01' 14" W 312.83 feet; thence 137.71 feet along a curve to the left having a radius of 270 feet and whose chord bears S 80° 21' 38" W 136.24 feet; thence 227.50 feet along a curve to the right having a radius ' of 330 feet and whose chord bears S 85° 30' 03" W 222.99 feet; thence 192.81 feet along a durve to the left having a radius of 270 feet and whose chord bears S 84° 47' 31" W 188.77 feet; ' thence N 24° 40' 00" W 60.00 feet; thence S 84° 06' 55" W 433.63 feet; thence N 50° 12' 17" W 430.52 feet; ' thence N 90° 00' 00" W 110.00 feet; thence N 00° 00' 00" E 444.93 feet; thence S 78° 00' 00" E 82.52 feet; thence N 87° 02' 00" E 374.60 feet to the point of beginning; and containing 28.337 acres more or less, and TRACT B A tract of land lying on and 30 feet either side of a centerline described as follows: Beginning, at a point whence the northeast corner of Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian bears N 55° 45' 15" E 2693.66 feet; thence 246.834 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 300 feet and whose chord bears N 88° 51' 44" E 239.93 feet; thence 436.863 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 300 feet and whose chord bears S 67° 33' 58" E 184.30 feet; thence N 700 43 04" E 399.28 feet; thence 185.01 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 300 feet and whose chord bears N 46° 39' 53" E 182.09 feet to an end point; and containing 1.450 acres more or less; and TRACT C Beginning at a point whence the northeast corner of Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian bears N 550 45' 15" E 2693.66 feet; thence S 24° 42' 31" E 30.00 feet; thence S 03° 42' 35" E 233.96 feet; thence S 790 50' 45" E 136.13 feet; thence N 71° 44' 07" E 319.08 feet; thence S 32° 47' 58" E 160.61 feet; thence N 87° 58' 13" E 141.09 feet; thence N 00° 00' 00" E 120.00 feet; thence N 90° 00' 00" E 310.00 feet; thence S 24° 32' 41" E 329.80 feet; thence S 63° 14' 14" E 388.63 feet; thence N 11° 06' 34" W 280.25 feet; thence N 88° 07' 20" W 122.07 feet; thence N 00° 00' 00" E 100.00 feet; thence N 27° 00' 46" E 286.23 feet; thence S 77° 28' 16" E 479.42 feet; thence S 68° 41' 30" E 410.03 feet; thence S 28° 13' 27" E 355.24 feet; thence S 03° 01' 58" W 386.00 feet; 44° thence S thence N thence N thence N thence N thence N thence N thence 90° 75° 49° 81° 12' 27" W 304.88 feet; 00' 00" W 1201.00 feet; 46' 07" W 284.74 feet; 12' 25" W 356.64 feet; 11' 27" W 346.08 feet; 59° 06' 06" W 449.84 feet; 21° 42' 33" E 253.99 feet; 488.43 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 330 fet and whose chord bears N 22° 54' 05" E 445.11 feet; thence S 24° 42' 31" E 30.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 50.580 acres more or less; All in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado. IV wv!)U 5/4"./4/NUS 4 2 Ml 17'30" 0 70051 on4i 1 500 000 FEET R. 89 W. R. 88 W. NiNis 2���� I � n Y V L. f\ 1 LS. , f 11\44) 306 10741E - 3 ,/ Zz—v-X\-ttr('-' 32 7000 BM 5957 36 Y � � ave Yra Ix 959 600 0 11 6725 11 Nt J 11 61 fC 43' T 437 437 437( 27' 4369 LEGAL ACCESS The site abutts and has direct access to County Road 109 and Westbank Road platted in Filing No. 3. POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION Police Protection is provided by Garfield County Sheriff's Department. Fire protection is provided by Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District, and by Glenwood Springs Fire Protec- tion District. (See attached letters) POLITICAL JURISDICTION The entire Westbank Ranch is within the jurisdiction of Garfield County. No incorporated area exists within a 2.0 mile radius of the site. Forseeable incorporation into a municipality appears fairly remote. ADJACENT LAND OWNERSHIP The attached alphabetical list comprises the adjacent land ownerships. (Source: Names and addresses of adjacent landowners were researched by .and are from Land Design, Inc.) 12 • • :ENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 August 14,1979 Glenwood Springs Fire Protection District 806 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear Mr. Buzz Zancanella, Reference: Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4, a residential development. I am referring to you a sketch of a proposed development located in Section 1, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. I would appreciate your reviewing the enclosed sketch with emphasis on: availability of equipment to handle any forseeable emer- gency; district boundaries; and run time to the site. Please send me your comments for our subdivision application to Garfield County as soon as possible. Enclosures 13 Sincerely, 44.51/ Dale L Lauer P.E. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ..ENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 August 14, 1979 Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District 300 Meadowood Carbondale, Colorado 81601 Dear Mr. Robert A. Luttrell, Fire Chief I am referring to you a sketch of a proposed development located in Section 1, and Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. I would appreciate your reviewing the encl- osed sketch with emphasis on: availability of equipment to handle any forseeable emergency; district boundaries; and run time to the site. Please send me your comments for our subdivision application to Garfield County as soon as possible. Enclosures 14 Dale L. Lauer P.E. WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Carl E. & Lillian Baker 0074 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Roland & Jean M. Bame 3792 - 117 Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Lyle W. & Patsy J. Beattie P.O. Box 8 Glenwood Spgs, CO Lester F. & Wanda S. Bickel 0965 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Helen G. Bishop P.O. Box 1145 Carbondale, CO. Herman F. & Hilda W. Brueggeman 1123 Riverview Dr. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Alan J. & Cheri A. Cappo 0252 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. R obert F. & Joan L. Chaffin P.O. Box 698 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Steven E. & Rebecca A. Connolly 0041 Oak Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. George & Waudene Cowen 0644 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John R. & Elaine Crump 0368 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Joseph S. & Carol J. Dombrowski 3203-1/2 Cooper Ct. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Dennis W. & Terrie R. Drake 0377 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Cecil L. & Elizabeth B. Dunn 0836 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. 15 James M. & Ann B. Eddins P.O. Box 1483 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Dennis Edson P.O. Box 779 Carbondale, CO. Charles W. & Mary E. Ensor 0088 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Parvin & Timothy B. Erlandsen 0794 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Gerald W. Fairbanks Const. 0507 Westbsnk Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Hazel Finley 0028 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Howard V. & Susan E. Frisch 0896 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Robert N. & Judith A Fuller 0102 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Ronald J. & Mary L. Fuller P.O. Box 1102 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Delbert & Jean Garner P.O. Box 938 Basalt, CO. Jerry M. & Judith Gerbaz Box 1964 Aspen, CO. James T. & Roberta A. Gill 0345 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Norman L. & Nancy L. Gould 0066 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Terry O. & Stephanie Gunderson 10866 Berry Ave. Englewood, CO. WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Howard H. & Janice C. Hall 0283 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Gary L. & Linda J. Heisel P.O. Box 1324 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Elmer K. & Maxine Herklotz 51427 Hwy 6 & 24 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Stewart & Virginia Hineline 0122 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John C. Hochstedler P.O. Box 323 Basalt, CO. John Jr. & Delores Huebinger P.O. Box 987 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Ken F. & Tina L. Hush P.O. Box 1412 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Don Ice 1244 Road 106 Carbondale, CO. J & M Investments (no address) George E. Jaynes 775 - 36th St. Los Alamos, N.M. 87544 Allen G. & Valeria Johnson P.O. Box 417 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Richard D. & Anna L. Johnson 0224 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Duane L. 0049 Oak Glenwood & Elizabeth A. Keck Ln. Spgs, CO. Richard F. & Phyllis J. Kekar 12694 St. Hwy 82 Carbondale, CO. 16 LaDonna Knudson 2407 Isabel St. Sante Fe, N.M. 87501 Dale A. & Nancy Laramie 0029 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. F. Dean & Charlene E. Lillie 0570 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Richard L. & Shirlee Lindgren 1114 England St. Hunington Bch, CA. 89048 R. Parrish Lysbett (no address) Fred R. & Bette M. Martin 0279 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Thomas M. & Clydette Matheny 0086 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Kenneth L. & Eva Melby 0089 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Carl A. & Blanche Miller 1154 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Robert J. & Karen A. Miller 0352 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Donna M. Minard P.O. Box 398 Basalt, CO. James A. Penzotti & Kevin Fetch P.O. Box 232 Snowmass, CO. 81654 Wesley J. & Delores K. Pidcock 0607 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Lamar & Joan Podbevsek 1132 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. NES'I'BANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Ron F. & Bonnie A. Radtke 1034 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Mike H. & Bonnie J. Rich 928 Pitkin Ave. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John A. & Susan L. Reeves 0701 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John W. & Mary E. Reid Box 525 Glenwood Brook J. 51519 Hw Glenwood Spgs, CO. & Marilyn M. Robison 6 & 24 Apt. 16 Spgs, CO. Leonard J. & Barbara Rosner 0942 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Velma F. & Fred M. Rowland 572 Galena St. Aurora, CO. 81611 Walter J. & Afton L. Roy 2922 Glen Ave. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Fredrick W. & Kathryn L. Schall P.O. Box 1004 Carbondale, CO. Marshall L. & Sharon J. Box 847 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Edward J. Schwab 1032 Pitkin Ave. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Schield Donald S. & Marilyn M. Shipanik 0215 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Larry D. & Helen A. Shoup 1107 Willoch Dr. Racino, WI. 53406 Arthur Small 812 Grand Avenue Glenwood Spgs, CO. 17 Edward J. & Virginia M. Smith 0543 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Jack A. & Nina D. Sonnier Box 1991 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Donald Stanfield 0795 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Hall & Mary B. Stewart 0784 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Richard & Delores Stutsman Box 188 Aspen, CO. Gary A. Sutherland 809 Grand Avenue Glenwood Spgs, CO. Dale R. & Suzanne Titus Box 31 Glenwood Spgs, CO. M. J. & Betty J. Turnipseed P.O. Box 1089 Carbondale, CO. Joseph Vittum 0170 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. William R. & Linda B. Walden 158 N. Gypsum Creek Rd. Gypsum, CO. 81637 John A. & Letitia L. Wenisch P.O. Box 2913 Aspen, CO. Warren T. & Linda K. Wienke Box 340 El Jebel, CO. John Wix Box X Basalt, CO. Jean 0. Wood 821 Grand Avenue Glenwood Spgs, CO. • • WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Alfred W. & Cora J. Wright P.O. Box 1292 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Roger W. & Ardis J. Wulf 1329 Pitkin #8 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Clinton D. & M. Louise York Box 1513 Glenwood Spgs, CO. J. Robert Young 0110 Oak Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Emmett G. Jr. & Dixie J. Zerr 0676 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. • • MINERAL RIGHTS Commercial aggregates were encountered in the geological investigation of the site. Withdrawal of the aggregate deposit, when contrasted against Roaring Fork valley deposits, is believed to be of insigni- ficant impact. Demand for residential useage is expected to substantially exceed any foreseeable mineral useage. WATER RIGHTS ' Water for the proposed Filing No. 4 will be supplied by existing wells through expansion of distribution systems and addition of storage facilities. Water rights were pre- viously searched by James M. Larson, Attorney, and Ray D. Walker, P.E., and pertinent portions of both reports are included (see attached sheets). 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DEMAND: 1 1 RATE: (62720)(3.0)I6461272 = 0.29 CFS CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENT CRITERIA: 200 GPCD Water Use 98 Residences 3.2 Persons per Residence 3.0 Peak Factor for Pipe Sizing 3.0 Allowable Water Main Velocity (F/S) (200)(98)(3.2) = 62,720 GPD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PIPE SIZE: dpipe 1441 (112.) d pipe d�r 4.2" < 6" O.K. pipe 20 1 JAMES M. LARSON • ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 476 TELEPHONE GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 303 - 945-8659 August 30, 1978 1 1 Mr. Ron Liston Land Design Partnership ' Suite 208, Village Plaza Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 ' Dear Ron: Enclosed is a brief written summary of the water rights owned by Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. relative to both domestic 1 and irrigation adjudications. The deed by which Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. acquired title to the Westbank Ranch properties, conveyed "any and all ditch and water rights belonging to, used ' upon or in connection with said lands", and then went on to describe specifically the various priorities in the Robertson Ditch No. 47. It would appear that by the conveyance language, ' Westbank acquired all water and ditch rights and not only limiting the same to Robertson Ditch No. 47, although Westbank is unaware of any ownership in or claim to water or ditch rights ' other than Robertson Ditch No. 47. Yours truly, V/ CC 1 1 JML/ef Enc. cc: Mr. John Huebinger, Jr. 1 1 21 JAMES M. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 411 P.O. BOX 476 TELL/'HONE ' 7.^ GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 01601 ]O] - 9aSE 659 August 30, 1978 1 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Ron Liston of Land Design Partnership requests that I ' briefly outline the water rights appurtenant to the Westbank Ranch Subdivision in Garfield County, Colorado. ' I previously have furnished Mr. Liston with copies of pertinent documents evidencing the existance of such rights. I therefore will not duplicate my efforts with regard to such photocopy information. The domestic water rights are comprised of Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Well No. 1 (15 gpm), Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. ' Well No. 2 (15 gpm), and Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd., Well No. 3 (25 gpm absolute, 15 gpm conditional). All of said water rights have been adjudicated for domestic purposes and other purposes, ' and domestic use is the primary use to service the single family dwellings which have been constructed at Westbank Ranch Subdivision together with their appurtenant lawns and gardens. 1 The other domestic right is represented by Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Well No. 4. An Application for this water right ' will shortly be filed seeking an adjudication of 135 gpm for domestic, commercial and recreational purposes. My understanding is that all four wells are presently in use and are pumping at the adjudicated amounts. ' On October 27, 1975 the water referee for Water Division No. 5 entered his ruling with respect to the Robertson Ditch, ' out of which Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. has certain adjudicated rights, namely 10.0 cubic feet of water per second of time encompassing three different adjudications, an original and two ' enlargements. The ruling allowed Westbank to change the method of use of the water owned in the Robertson Ditch and to store the water, at necessary times, in five storage ponds and therefrom to use the water for recreational, piscatorial, and irrigation 1 purposes for the Westbank Ranch Golf Course. All construction encompassed by the requested change was completed and the system has been in full operation since August of 1972. The referee's 1 1 22 1 ' August g 30, 1978 Page 2' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ruling was made the judgment and decree of Court on April 26, 1976 JML/ef cc: Mr. John Huebinger, Jr. Yours very truly, 23 ' • • 1 1 1 1 1 WEST BANK RANCH 1 WATER RIGHTS Prepared by Ray D. Walker P.E. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 Name of Water Right Robertson Robertson Robertson West West West West Bank Bank Bank Bank Ditch* Ditch* Ditch* Westbank Ranch Water Rights Adj. Date Approp. Date Pri. Amt. Amt. CFS Owned 05/11/1889 02/11/1883 52 4.0 1.6 05/11/1889 04/01/1885 112 3.5 1.4 10/24/1952 04/02/1950 9.0 7.0 * W-2516 Change of Use Well No. 1 Well No. 2 Well No. 3 Well No. 4 12/31/1972 12/31/1972 12/31/1978 12/31/1978 25 12/31/1962 12/31/1962 04/11/1976 09/01/1977 10.0 Total Amt. W. - GPM Case 15 1064 15 1064 40 3691 135 3898 205 Total Domestic Water "The water system serving the existing Westbank development will be extended to serve the PUD housing. There will be no irrigation from the water system; all irrigation will be with ditch water from existing irrigation ditches and will be provided as required to individual homeowners. This is the same situation which exists in the present development. Average daily demand is estimated at 33,000 GPD for the PUD and 68,000 for all of Westbank. Peak day demand is estimated at three times the average day or 99,000 GPD and 204,000 GPD respectively; peak instantaneous demand is estimated at six times average day demand or 138GPM and 285 GPM respectively. Total well capacity in the four (4) existing wells is estimated at 150 GPM which is more than adequate to provide the peak day demand of 140 GPM (204,000 GPD). The PUD will constitute a separate pressure zone and will require its own storage facility. Water will be pumped to this zone from the existing pressure zone. Storage will be 85,000 gallons based on provided an average day demand plus 500 gallons fire storage per unit. Distribution lines will be minimum 6 -inch, designed to deliver 500 GPM to all fire hydrants at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi." * Quoted from the report by Dean W. Gordon P.E. 26 • Water For Irrigation Purposes The use of water for landscape irrigation is applied principally on grasses. The growing season for grasses is longer in duration than the frost -free periods of each year. The growing season for grasses will generally extend from the first of May through September and has been assumed to be an average of 163 days. The quantity of water required for irrigation to sustain grasses is equal to the seasonal evapo-transpiration rate less precipitation. Based on several studies conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture on blue grass at Fort Collins, Colorado, these grasses will evaporate approximately 26 to 30 inches per season. The average annual precipitation during the growing season is 6.0 inches, leaving a net irrigation requirement of 20 to 24 inches per year. The maximum areas which may be placed into landscape will equal the total platted areas for each area of development, less areas placed into paved streets, parking areas, walkways, driveways, building and open spaces. The potential irrigated acreages are as follows: 1. Existing Westbank Ranch -- 100 dwelling units Potential irrigated land -- 100.6 acres 2. Westbank Ranch P.U.D. (expansion area) -- 101 dwelling units and park Potentially irrigated land -- 34.6 acres 3. Westbank Golf Course Potentially irrigated land -- 40.0 acres Total 175.2 acres 27 •410 ' Analysis Total well capacity in the four (4) existing wells is ' decreed for 205 gallon per minute based on the actual yeilds of the individual wells. ' Total water available from the three (3) Robertson ditch rights equals ten (10) cubic feet of water per second of time. If the Robertson Ditch rights were utilized to their full potential during the 163 day growing season, ' 3,260 acre feet of water would be diverted. The 175.2 acres of potentially irrigated lands of the Westbank Ranch could require as little as 350.4 acre feet per ' year based on the Fort Collins studies. The ten (10) cubic feet of water is more than adequate for the 175.2 acres. Special Comments ' The earliest two Robertson water rights are senior enough to prevent being "called out" by downstream appropriators. The 1950 Robertson water right and the Westbank well rights are relatively junior rights but are protected from ' curtailment. This protection is partially provided by releases from Green Mountain Reservoir for irrigation and domestic use during the normal irrigation season ' (April 15 to October 15). Additional protection can be provided by long range contract through the Colorado River Water Conservation Disctrict with the Bureau of Reclamation ' for water stored in Reudi Reservoir. Respectfully�lsubmitted, Ray D. Walker P.E. 1 1 1 1 � 28 ' 110 • EXISTING EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS FILING NO. 4) ' Garfield County Road Book 305, Page 204 ' Mountain Bell Book 430, Pages 134, 135 Robertson Ditch No. 47 ' (Established 1883, Adjudicated 1889) Holy Cross Electric Association ' Book , Page Public Service Company Book 321, Page 502 Book 321, Page 237 ' (See Attached Copies) ' Rocky Mountain Gas Book 337, Page 255 ' Garfield County Road 109 Book 45 , Page 301 ' Book 45 , Page 303 1 1 �757 1 1 1 1 1 t#1037 1 1 1 1 1 1 • The Robertson and Teller Ditch Signed by: David C. Robertson George Teller • STATEMENT Dated January 2, 1884 Acknowledged by both clafiDantt on January 2, 1884 before J. C. Pease, County Clerk, Garfield County, Colorado. Claims right of way for ditch and 5,000 inches water from the Roaring Fork River through the ditch described as beginning at a. point of rocks about 1 mile above mouth of Cattle Creek on West bank of said river under which is head of ditch, thence northwesterly one mile, thence by the most practicable route for a ditch to the point or bluff about 112 mile above the mouth of Cattle Creek. Filed for record January 2, 1884 at 3:00 o'clock P. M., and recorded in Book 7 at Page 115 thereof. Chas. Bovard To Wm. 1Nurchy, Trustee The then Acting Sheriff of Garfield County, Colorado, Successor DEED OF TRUST Dated August 1, 1884 Acknowledged August 1, 18£4 before Wm. B. Root, County Clerk, Pitkin County, Colorcdc Consideration $200.00 Conveys the Bovard Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado described as situated on Roaring Fork River at the mouth of Cattle Creek batween the ranch of R. R. Teller and Charlie Chalmers and in possession of first party, containing about 160 acres. In trust to secure grantor's note of even date for the principal sun of $200.00 due in 90 days aftQr date, with interest at the rate of 2% per month. Filed for record August 7, 1884 at 6:00 o'clock P. M., and recorded in Book 4 at Page 226 thereof. John W. Hardwick SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED To Dated August 3, 1886 Acknowledged August 3, 1886 Colorado Midland Railway Company before F. C. Childs, County Judge, Garfield County, Colo. Consideration $275.00 Conveys: A 100 foot strip of land through the N-,11; ,.: 4 Sec. 1 and SdLMEt Sec. 2, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 6th. P. M., Garfield County, Colorado. Filed for record August 12, 1886 at 12:20 o'clock P. M., and recorded in Book 1 at Page 129 thereof. 2.9k 0:•.757 • 1 1 1 1 11.., 2931 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *.tv4►t,r .,i61Jeoi 1:Y.tU i. ., Loert..on Georze :'elle • P.:ted Janu_r:- 2, 1E84 ;,ekno 1cdicd by Lot'. clai-anti on Jan. 2, ,JL4 before J. C. se, County Clerk of r_'i. l ci County, Colorado. t;i�1.►:s ri :ht of way for ditch and 5000 in:hes of waer from the :.o..rin5 Pork river throe rh ditch de:icrited .s ; c •innii-- at oint of rocke ..bout one/ anile above t •ac -.oath of Cattle Crc ek on the ►kst b, nk of acid river, under which is head of .itch, thence :,orthwestcrly one vile, t .ince b,• thr' ort r r.:ctical route for a •ditch to the point or bluff about 1./2 wile above the outh of Cattle Creek. Fled for record Janu::ry 2, 1884 at 3:00 oUock T'.►:., :.nd recorded in book 7 ,t p.ge 115 thereof. Jno. Hardwick 3i2CIAL'a ''.;Y LEAD To Colorado .•.idlE;nv hallway Co., Dated t.0 -ust 3, 1EE6 Lcknowlec ;ed :.0 ;. 3, 1 C5 before F.. C. Childs, Co..nty Jud Vie, of Gdrficl.d County Colorado Consideration 275.00 Conve;; s: I 100 root strip tLrou h the Il„', t; of Section 1 and tLe :a►r;;.'.i o. ..kc. 2, +p. 7 R. C9 ;4. 6th P.M. Seco d party a;reel to provide paaage way for irri;-.: tint; Litch and ctc. rri1 t. for record i:uaust 12, lj.;86 Et 12:20 o'c1o6 '.t.., 8•16 r: cor reed in bok• 1 at .page 129 thereof. .. Jar. 7. ,., dwic ► 12437 a 1 1 1 1 _F_Cii.L .' :i�I;TY DELI) to Dated Lu -.1st 2, 1886 4, before Color;,uo. ;.. 1L:nu hallway Co., D. ::,; ;ruCcr, Justice of ^t ice Ccrfelc Count,:, Colo : o Consiccra_tion „500.00 Con�cys: .. 100 foot strir, of land t:.ro:�--h t1:e :::'i... , End t: c i�ii;,111,t4 of Zee. 2, T:. 7 S. h. 69• Z. 6th P..• , 3ccond rty r:c to put in culverts for rasa:.;e of ':r. ter for irri -ction ;Lir occs. {:lso c‘.11;;le guares. /ilea fir r€cora iu-ust 12 l ,E6 .t 12:20 o'cloc;. recorded in Look 1 at ; c 131 ti ercof. ., nd Ct►e11:r.an,;:idow of Chcs. Iceea3ed, in her .own right and a3-uardin of the est;..te of .lr:.cie i:. , i.herlie 1., and i'oL.i;;e Chelll;,an, .:inters, -nd only' heirs at law o: szid Chas. Ghelli,an, i.occased. To ::olor�.:lo :.idl,4nd ;cailway Co., DEED D::ted July 29, 'S86 Si ncd Lau:•t .2hc:11:,.an, CLel :r n Ci.srlic .i,:: 11..rin, Loui::c Che11..an, b. Laura CI►rllr.n their z.c)':ncbrluc -ed July 3C, 1656 Li. fore Thos. Leonard, Lc Co. n►.y Cler-k Win., corder o: r _ County, Color_:uo. ,Consider_t=on .375.00 Conveys: A 100 foot strip oI: 1..nc o bL: rou -h .,7:e !:_ End • ,!. 7 J. F, , of .,.1 C• 1 :.na the.�:,:;L:.:; :.' C.c. �:. 1 L. ... :,tatil i'.:•.: tcuf►d ;art: :.4',rt.es to l.�rovic j ac..c �e wily lo:. ::i.ter t.i:ro,:ch its ;ride for ir•ritin,; j L.rj ores ;.n:: c..ttic ri;.cd for record .,u :u.,t 12, 1;:'.'6 at 12 o'clock i .... , crd rc c.or;.ed ir, cook i c.L 2 : i j thereof._ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :.cr:ia A. irewett, (noo toniarr L. ::t,rdwick, w re of Li. jab .n Pr%,wettY To Colorado E.idlvnd hailr:ay 2 PELF) Dated l.0 llit 3, lr•66 :cd Donia L. rrewat, by.Donia ' . Pr'_t•:ett nee onic A. Hardwick, wife of Benj. Pr( wet Aug. 6, 13..6 bcfor e r'. (. Childs Garfield ':ounty, Cc lc Cunside:•i.tion 0.37.50 Conveys: h 100 foot strip of of . . p. 7 R. . Gth Filed for record . u •ust 12p 18S6 at 12:2L o' cloc}: .". ., ane:r orde•d in book 1 at j ase 13o thereof. Jno. ..., and :•:yrtie E. herd- gli t:iCh �a Doted 3, To :'.c::no..led -ed u-, 3, 1SC t efore F.C.Child3,County uude of l;:rfi etc County,Colo., by . oLn on .,u'. 4,...., ', efore 1.7,.:.a;;rucer Justice of i'cace,:,: r Heid County, Colo., by :yrtie ?:. E; rdwich Consider: tion ,1.00 Conveys: A 100 foot strap of 1,96 t' rough the of Ccc. 2, Tp. 7 C. h. C9 u. 6th P.L. riled for record ::u •ust 12, 186 at 12:20 recorded in book 1 at II;@ 137 L: eroof. Laurc Chell...an, ' idcw of Chcrlcs Ci:rll.::a n, deceased in her own rin ht and Gracie , Charlie A., and Louise Chell::.an, as ..linors r,nd only heirs c,t law of ,.3id aeuodent Ly L;,;ura LY+ell., an il.ei� Duredi:..n • fo Colorado , ic.lc:r.d ::r.il+:c.; Co., Color -do .iclanc iia l..y Co., n' clock ?'.. .1 • nd rEED Dz..ed :epte...Ler• o, 1886 signed: Laura ChellL;.an, 1r,cie .Che11.a .n,Chdrlieh.Ch_ 11..an, Louis: Elie ll.:an,;:anor3, by Laura CLell:..an uardi.n ..inor.., and so acf;n wle -ed ::ert. lJ,,l . before ..:o:••, J u:.ti ce of : s:.rficld Count:', Colorado, .:it -le by Chcv. .:. ar ro;. i';i] J. ! . Consider: tion .200.00 Conveys: i. 100 foot strip of ; an.: t: ro.: _;:. tine �.y ; c,r;c of Zed. 1 and ZLe d�,�;i; ;.; of ..cc. 2, Tp. : L9 ' ,h t t 7 -. � ut ••••r save i.; part of Laid subdivisions t,: rou -h ..;.iciis. id center line of aid h: 33c3 as last loc .fed ; ern - 'e. r tate : orti.Iacs%c rly line of above de. cribL d bind nLe. e a ':,ench seprates ti.e a -ric;•I;;u, fro;4 the j•czsture land : nd fro, •thence Dou thea sterly throt: ;Y: ti,e lo,,itr ..eua, ag ric'Ature land :-n:i now in outs and got toes il.ona said center line of ci:.:t,. nce of 735 _'e: ct or less to t i:e irri 'atio ditc:. .;}:ich Lo;ands the oat crop on the soutLer1y side in ; ,. rt or in whole and a strip cf land t:,rou h said ..esa aCriculture 1 nu now in cats a•.c j'otatocs and bounded in part by said, rc:nch :_rid s .id irri •;.Lion ditch 50 _'ec t in idth, t'Lc sa—e being next to, d j: cent and coati -ious to and i:ortLe • stcrly of t..o rlr;i,t o�b.a.i. r•e.. :ore i u. c .used or: Jul; .:9, 105 of tor3 by s,.id-.._;:tEe, t;•ie lineal c:istL.nce of sc id .0 foot strip . einr* ?35 feet ..ore or hes. l,lso herc•t••, ecnvcys -.? 1 :.....: •es to crops on any : nci all purtions of „r. nte: ; ri.,ti.t cf , ay- :n2er :.ny and ,.11 de,ds Jscleby t,i,e s .;..c i:. !eco :..cquiced. (co John W. and Myrtie E. Hardwick To Colorado Midland Railway Company gIT CLAIM DEED Dated August 3, 1886 Signed same, acknowledged by John W. Hardwick on August 3, 1886 before F. C. Childs, County Judge, Garfield County Colorado and by Myrtie E. Hardwick on August 4, - - - before D. N. Magruder, Justice of the Pcace, Garfield County Colorado. Consideration $1.00 Conveys: a 100 foot strip through NiNEk Section 2, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 6th. P. M., Garfield County, Colorado. Filed for record August 12, 1886 at 12:20 o'clock P. M., and recorded in Book 1 at Page 137 thereof. Laura Chellman, widow of Charles Chellman, deceased in her own right and Gracie E., Charlie A. & Louise, Chellman, as minors and on�rr heirs at law of Decedent by Laura Chellman, their Guradian SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED Dated Scptehr 6, 1886 Signed L_ ura Chellman, Gracie E. Chellman, Charlie A. Chellman, Louise Chellman, Minors by Icu_a Che1Ln^n, To Guardian of said minors and co acknowledged September 14, 1886 before Lyrxan B. Now, Justice of the Peace, Garfi_eL County, Colo r do. Witnesses: Charles W. Dar -cow J. N. Larson Consideration $200.00 Conveys: A 100 foot strip though r'EkSWk and S!N k Sec. 1, & SEkNEk Sec. 2, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., save that portion of said subdivisions through which said center line of railway passes as last located beginning near the northwesterly line of above dcrcri' land where a bench separates the agricultural from the pasture land, and from thence Southeasterly through the lower mesa, agricultural land and now in oato and potatoesa along said center line of railway as located a distance of 735 feet more or less to the irrigation ditch which bounds the oat crop on the southerly side in part or in chole and a strip of land through said mesa, agricultural land now in oats and potatotes and bounded in part by said bench and said irrigation ditch 50 feet in width, the same being next to, adjacent and contiguous to and northeasterly of the right of way heretofore purchased on July 29, 1886 of said Grantors by said Grantees, the lineal distance of said 50 foot strip being 735 feet more or less. Colorado Midland Railway Cornpnny continued • • 1 c#3085 continued 1 Also conveys hereby all damage to crops nn any and all portions of grantees right of way under any and all deeds whereby the same has been acquired. The grantors are described as follows: Laura Ghellt widow of Chas. Chellman, deceased, in her own rights and Gracie E., Charlie A., and Louise Chellman, minors and only heirs at law of said Chas. Chellman, deceased, by Laura Chellman, Guardian of the Estate of said Minor. Filed for record September 14, 1886 at 3:15 o'clock P. M., and recorded in Book 8 at Page 149 thereof. 1 1 I/9 1E801. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Laura Chellman, in her own behalf and as guardian of the estate and of Gracie E., Charles A. Chellman, Minors, who together with said husband of said Laura Chellman, who filed Declaratory Statement on the land hereinafter described. DEED Dated December .7,. 1887 Signed Laura Chellman, Gracia E. Chellman, Charles A. Chellman, minors by Laura Chellman, their guardian and so acknowledged December 7, To 1087 before C. W. Darrow, Notary Pu i.c , Garfield Count: Colorado. Consideration $435.00 Recites heirships of grantors of Charles L.Chellr.,an, deceased, who filed Declaratory Statement in his lifetime on cc;: twin lands: Recites publication of Notice for order of sale by wards of lands hereinafter described and entry of such order by Judge of District Court, Garfield County, Colorado on December 6, 1887 for sale of lands described therein including the interest of Louise Chellman and infant deceased, whose interestpaid Laura Chapman, as its Mother has succeeded undeir Sec.. 2288 Rev. Stat.. U.S. to grantee for $77.50 to each of sett Minors. Conveys a strip of land 100 feet wide, being 50 feet wide on each side of the centre line of the Railroad of second party, as now located extending through NE4S.J1/4, SI1NJ4 Sec. 1, SE1;NE4 Sec. 2 Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 6th. P.M., Garfield County, Colorado and also :a additional st4 of land for right of way 50 feet wide through a portion of said S,r'4NW1/4 Sec. 1 and SE:NE4 Sec. 2 of a lineal disian^.a of 700 feet being next to said 100 feet strip and lying on the southwesterly side thereof and extending from a line crrssing said center line of railroad at right Eng.es and passing through station or location stake of said Railway and also the perpetual use of a 28 foot strip of land in said hF•'Z Sec. 1 for 'waste or overflow water ditch as now dug, being a strip of land including said ditch and the land on which the excavated earth from said ditch now lies and extending from the Roaring Fork River to the above described 100 foot strip, the centre line of which ditch crosses said 100 foot strip at or near Ste. 3330 -/- 61 of saki r siluay being a distance of 575 feet more or less and eelttendng from said 100 foot strip Northwesterly to the W. line of said NE70;74 Sec. 1. Relea.'es second party from all damages arising from constructing its railway ever first partys lands and overflow of water from said waste water ditch. The Colorado Midland Railcay Company Filed for record December 7, 1387 at 4:00 o'clock P. M., and recorded in Book 1 at Page 285 thereof. 1 1 20 119500 1 1 1 1 • • Myrtle E. 'frdwick WARRANTY DEED • To John W. Hardwick Dated August 31, 1889 Acknowledged September 7, 1889 before C. W. Darrow, Notary Public, Garfield County, Colo. Consideration $1,500.00 Conveys: S' SE1 S= do 35, Tp. 6 and NINE! and SE1;NE 4 Sec. 2, and .hWkliWk Sec. 1, T. 7 S. R. 89 W , 6th. P. M., Garfield County, Colorado togeth* with al iwptn,vements situate thereon and all of first parties nterest in a d to the Robertson Irrigating Ditch and craters fly ing therein. Filed for ecord September 20, 1889 at 2:05 o'clock P. M., and recorded in :ook 19 at Page 482 thereof. 121 ROAD VIEi•?ER' S REPORT 1#10568 • View completed February 17, 1890. Filed in the office of the County Clerk on March 24, 1890. Presented to the Board of County Commissio: on April 29, 1890 and following action had: "Report adopted and roa, I as herein located, declared a County Road - H. W. Hallett, Chairman, Signed: C. W. Darrow, John W. Hardwick and Geo. Sievers, Viewers. Road begins at Rock Creek Bridge, thence Northwesterly substantially I along the so-called Gay Toll Road to ranch claimed by S. D. Gray, 1085.5 geet or thereabouts, thence across the. various ranches to the Roaring Fork River and across the same highway on opposite side. I Ind taken: S. D. Gray - 60 ft. through lots 4 & 14, Sec. 33, Tp. 7 S., R. 89W. 3 1/3 acres. I J. Kaiser.- 60 ft. through Lot 13, Sec. 28, and Lot 19, See. 29, Tp. 7S., R. 89W., 3 4/5 acres. C:Ias. Fravert - 60 ft. part of way and 30 feet rest of caay, through 1 Lots 8, 12 and 13, Sec. 29, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 3 2/3 acres. C. E. Denmark, 60 ft. part of way and 30 feet rest of way, through Lots 7 and 4, Sec. 29, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 2 9/10 acres; 1 Peter `;cEderick - 60 ft, thruugh Lots 14 and 15, Sec. 20, Tp. 7 ' S. R. 89W., 87/100 acres. Henry Sievers - 60 ft., through Lot 13, Sec. 20 and Lots 16, 9, 11, Iand 12Sec. 19, ' Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 5I acres; Geo, Sievers, - 60 ft. unsurveyed in Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 2 acres;' I Timm Sievers, - 60 £t. unsurveyed in Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 1 acre; Gov't. Land., - 60 ft. unsurveyed in Tp. 7 S. R. 89 W., 3 acres; Tim Sievers, - 60 ft., unsurveyed in Tp. 7 S., R. 891., 3 acres; 'Gov't. Land, - 60 ft., unsurveyed in Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 2 acres; Geo. Teller - 60 ft. through unsurveyed land in Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 1 7/8 acres; right of way paid for by the County; C. W. Darrow, 60 ft. through N4t,;114, SS14I:E1; and NI;NE4 Sec. 12, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 61 acres; Heirs of Chas. Chellman, 60 ft. through uusurveycd lend in Section 12, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 1/2 acre; Gov't. land, 60 ft. through unsurveyed land in Section 12, Tp.;7 S. R. 89 W., 1/2 acres; Heirs of Chas. Che1lman, 60 ft. through unsurveyed land in Section 12, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W., 12 acres; JN W. Hardwick, 60 t. through Lot 4 Sec. 1 Tp. sr._, R 89W., 1 2 acr ' Gov t. Land, 60 ft. thro`ujh S`oVeJV' Sec. 36,p. bS. , R. W. j4 acres. Pi ed for record July 7. 1890 at 11:10 A. M . Book 1 at Page 119 A ie 4U 5416 1 1 1 Is oc ei: a 231 Dcted rove er 20, 1902 y hcknct;le c' :•'ed :.cv. 20, .1902 . be fore ;',^. CLrdrell , County Clc: rk of Garfield Ccc,lty, Colorado C:.r.ciuer: tion �,1.00 -.Conveys: A strip of lt.nd 60 feet in i.ida30 feet on ec:ch side of the center line which becins �t a poi: -t in ,.arc center of the Co.nty F.oad to C&rbcn{tale as now corse ructed in Lot 13, Cec. 1, Tp. 7 3. P. 89 - . 6th F.11., whence .'. e ; of nt sof intersetion of center lines of eid County hoes Ln the ..c. n tr cI o�' Color::co ;.idland t a.ilro d bet.rs ::Doth .].�' 30' i.t ct 6(0 feet, ..hence r:orth 17°36+ rest lt,t; feet to a ,;.oint on tare lire tc� ;'c�et'_ or.s 1 and 2 in s.ia Tp., thence with ca,r,e course,120 feet to -�t t} nee ?;orthr50°21 .:rr.�t1C5C =eet to c -oLnt,• thence- :sort: x..171 c et tow Iioirtt on the line to Lots 2 a' ( 13 in .'ec . 35, 6 S. cy 6t.. ..:`.. ;arc :��id :. c•v€ decc:•itcd r: i~: t of wc..y . bein :�itu:.t ed in .nd tr; vers'-, ; !e::;i 1 2 crd 12, 2; Lot 13 in :cc. 1, ' p. 7 3. :.. E9 ::. , Lot 2, -Fee. c ?:• ; -. ..9 . 6th P).; ., cc•nLe..nir:rf 3.46 cr ef:, ..or or Filed for record L vc.:t1�r 20, 1902 ��t .:1C c' c? oc!. ..'.. , end rL corded in bock ' 5 ;. t :e 301 the: eot. . er .:creh ;y. H:.rch: ck 2UITCL!._ r ' :D 1.:; 27262 To DL!ed irove:.ber 2Cy 1�iv2 1902 � ,, •e inc o rci of Conty Co.n:.�i3- :'d T. rF: ' or, Tet r : u' lic of s ioncrs Ger: _ r??• �'n• r,tt•, Cri,�: co ,.:firer. t _ _n .1 .00 Cunvt. A strip of 1Lnd 60 feat ,ride; 10 cit nr r .c. side of cont,:r line ce,'ibcd .:s ..o11o::s: Dei:irinr 12eir.t on the line to Lot;(2; .'7c:.13, 3 .c.35, 1 • . ;) .. ' ' ,:. , whence the t.._ "cater of is Lou 13, t;�.; rs 'Porth t,0 feet,' s.}-e:nee Forth 69°55'. .:est 12.0 e(° �e .. to a r Dirt, Lh�•rcc �::7t t}t 7t; : ;: . c?•�t 1174 feet to a , o.,nt; tLcnce :ort . k•i° 0' c:c.:�t 316 fent to a : o nt on the, line to :icts 15 P.nc 29 in said :cc. 35; c is ri •Lt o : .. c�- : itu:.tc in erns tr..':r� i s. i4ct:; 13, 1 c,nd 15 in said :'cc. 35,{ d Township 3.c1 acres ,..ore or less. mor record i:c?. t.er2.' , 1902 Lt 2:25 :,_corded in tool: tis c -.t ;.a•:c 303 t::,.rcof ' . To DLted : r r:�.r 17, 1902 ed : r b. 1'', 1902 1:cfore The ;Alio Truss« oof '.;ar- ;ia�ert iic�:c en, i:ot: ry Public • field County, Colorado. of der:'field Cont',uColo_ ' �r.uo Consider; tl on ,20b0.00 Conveys: Tie sane proi•erty�• as l:.st described beim Docjr25415. in trust to secure ;.7Lntor o 1cte b ar.� n^ even c?• to herewith for the aCr;re -r r sura of 2000.00, ; e• -: i 1c to t he o rdF r of DF. r. h r:. Hardwick, three, fot:r,• five tr.d rix vers cftcr c, *.e, with interest at 6h per :.nnuta, :: y,,t.iF, :r.• ual.ly. Filed for record Fct•ru&:r:• 17, 1902 t t 5:20 o'cloc'r F..•:., end recorded in book 41 t r:. -e 581 thereof. Georce A. Ha:•dr;ick iT CL: 'I':: _�r: D 1 1 1 1 1 To ' The Bo,.r•ci of C.ur.t Coca .is- .sioners 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '88 ^85216 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 �a,ab, 1 1 1 1 1 Ed O'Neil To The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield' County, Colorado. • SUIT CLAIM DEED, Dated September 19, 1923 Acknowledged November 13, 19 before Walter J. Frost, Clerk end Recorder of Garfield County, Coloredo. Consideration $1.00 Conveys all that strip of land 60 feet in width, being 30 feet 6n each side of the center line thereof for County Reed purposes, said center -line being the center of the grade or road bed of the old Colordo Midland Railroad es the sc'ne was constructed through, over and upon the lands of said O'Neil, in Sections 35 e.nd 36 Tp. 6 S., R. 89 W., and Secs. 1 end 12, Tp. 7 S/, R. 89 W., end being between the Scuth and East line of the Rigney ranch and the North line of the old George Teller Place, now uJned by the Gentry Estate, together with that part of Lots 12 and 16 in Sec. 12, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 W. ,contained within 30 feet on each side of a center line be3inn{.nt on the center line.of the present old Coloredo r'idland railroad grarde, or road led, at a point 759 feet from the line beteeen the O'Neil and Teller places, measured northerly along the center line of cai.d rAilropd grade and running thence southwesterly to a paint in the present county road 30 ffeet north of the north line of the Teller -+lace, and 901 feet west of the center of scid railrond �;rac?e measured along the dividing line between the ;eller and O'N�il plac...s • Filed for. record Decerbdr 4, 192.3 at 3:50 o' clock P. M., J.ncl recorded in Book 133 Ft Page 178 thereof. es. N. King, F •lic Trustee of Gar cld County, Colorado Charles W Taylor Conveys Part containing 11 .a Lot 4 West of the all in Tp. 6 S.,. R. Part of Lots 13 containing 18 acres. containing 134 ncree County, Colorado. Lds. 28 and 29 7 S. , R. 89 W., COT water rights owne land. Recites th, PUBLIC TRUSTEE'S CERTIFICATE OF PW CJASE Dated Janncry 28, 1924 Consideration $9863.74 o Lots 11 and 6, east of the County Road in Sec. 35, es,. Lot 3 n Sec. 36 containing 7 acres; part of oaring 'ork River in Sec. 36, containing 5 acres, 89 V., 6th. P. M., Garfield County, Colorado. and 24 east of the County Road in Sec. 1, 10,11,12,17,16,22 .end 23 in Sec. 1, in Tp. 7 S., R. 39 W., 6th. P. N., Gar f it ld al Sec. ; Lots 4,7,8,9,12 and 16 in Sec. 12, Tp.r_ taining =6 acres. To6ethc_with all ditch njid Ly E. A. 0 Ieil and used in connection with said t by authority o trust deed dated Aug. 3, 1920 made executed aid delivered by E. . O'Neil, ad recorded in Book 1C9 at Page 506 given to secure to G. Pe Hell the payment of the sun of $9000.00 and on demand for sale in\writing, the Pdiic Trustee did on January 28 1924, expose to publicesale the above described property, an at caid sale Charles W. Taylor bid the stun of (9863.74 for said pre ise s, which being the highest end best bid the same was stuck off to in and he to pt deed for said premises en Oct. 29, 192 cer cd. ncc's sooner ri ed for record January 28, 1924 at 3:50 P. M., Book 107 Page 57. 1 1106 )cv166027 To J. V. Rose 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 • The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, state of C;,lcrsdi, and their successors in office. . �1J I T CLAIM DEED Dated September 15, 1948 Anknewlcdged September 15, 1^48 before Dorothy M. Cowles, Notary Ptah1. i.c , GarfielD County Colorado, Con.�idc?:ati.cn $1.00 CcL rcys: . strip :+f :and Cf) feet in width sirs'^ted In Sections 1 and 12, Tp. 7 S., R. 89 1; . , 5t! F. M., Gari.e1.0 C' t-ity, Colorado and being 33 feet on ei5`:er side of the following . de-crid line: EeL;ynninb �.e a point .':1:c-ico the ccr;�er o` :P;.0 Sr I hears N. 21°21' W. 1350.7 feet, thence S. 21°11' Ec.st 4;'9.l rc.,t; thence S. 46°55' Est 186.44 feet; tbence S. 54°34' E. 586.3 feet_; thence S. 3400'• East 662.6 feet; thence S. 38°8' E. 179.2 feet; thence S. 49'17' E. 446.8 feet; thence S. 31°25' East 160.2 feet:; *,hence S. 12°531 L. 424.6 feet; thence S. 8°16' E. 653.9 47eet: s.rd thence S. 10°41 E. 1735. fret to the South line of Lot 7, in s: -i:1 Sec. 12. Filed for record September 22, 1948 at 3:40 o'cloc!; P. M., qnd recorded in Book 238 at rage 539 therr!of. . l07 The roard of Co�nLy Commissioners • of Garfield Co.,laty, Colorado, by • • 66028Wm. R. fits, CheiruaL ,• duly appointed as ,i Commissioner and auti►oril:ed to• wake this ccnveyemee 1 1 1 1 1 1 J. V. aose • U 1'I CLLIli DLL") D..ted . _.c i.�.�::. c.�-15 , 1948 Ac•k; lo rd•.t. d sept_' ri ber 15, I Lei. -c C1. ;'c S. 1;eci), ., 1;Dtia.)- Funic, C�.r f '-1C Cu�_.':�•, a:lorcdo .,c.nslea. ..L,r. 1-.30 Cor:vcys i:ntc !Air. said pc: of t:lio .•c,'.rn0 1-cr rot -, :-t•nrncy in CC•r''t:� n, Inst in joint trriancyt1'.0 ,''U;..•`c,.(". ..(- . r ,.. ..r,� t ,signs and the lic:i::s Gr.d ase.!4;ns c'F £itch r" ` • h• following described ,p,..nparty, to -=.fit: .'1 .y7• . Y o' land 5 0 5c' in r., { (d'_r ' ti l e .' ( f (i 1,‘ T« L 1' - r-. d 16, Sec. 12, Tp. 7S. , r.. `:9 U., r-th. F. M., r.nr! 37 either ^Salt' o^ the i o11;;t'inz d.(_ :cr •-1-c �.:-_li'::; � '' r''�� r• '? hence the r�TiT ro ncr' of sed S(', 77, 1:snrr. N. 5C -;°t7' :'. !'"..9 .' ':; :nd thcnct: ". /;9°5:.1' t1. 815 r:et: to fc Ut.ct '.ir.e -,f s, t. c', L -,t '.'. Also, a strip of land 100 fret in t::i.drh, 17:-•.:n 'tfc.c abandoned Culo:'edo Yialand nai1w ny r;.ght of way, ni_tunted $n C:.•7_.:ions 1 and 12, Tp. 7 S., 7, 89 r, . , 6th. P. M., described as beginning at a point Thence t?e 1'.'1 e:, ;ter of said Section 1 hears N. 2.3.°21.' '. 1350.7 feet; .^nd nr_nr'e ;'o•.rt!e..,.y along the -t` Indonr.d r^,.oma -fir, r'Lh" c'' - .;C{.n: :'hence t'ic IN corner of sa i:1 S gin. 12, bears t,. 55°47' T•'. !!5•)`►,9 feet. Filed fur -e-,rd Septe:rbe:- 22, 1948 et 3:40 o' c 1o.,'c P. M. , and recorded in Book 238 at Page 540 tiwreof. 1 1 1 1 1 Ernes*.. rtr-r(:r C.r: .1t?r r ,t 5 t . Cf : . _'i ..::0• doss h,.r,. .• , v a.., k,;rt .r,t t • A1\ %ATCPAL GAS COMPANY, INC.; [)efVer, , Culurado, Grantee, its sut , ssor 5 ,r r ` sun: of l�ULLAPS ($ :t " r ,ind o h r t considera- tions, acre •�� f it . r 5,.) 'eet in tions, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, right of k ar s width, ,to lay, maintain, operate, repair, alter , inspe, r ; pr''ti'(t , rc•'' .F =,r)d roplact: pipe lines, valves, valve boxes, and other gas distributior and related taritrtits over, through, ' under and across the following' described land and pr* -miser situated in tt:e County of .._�— ,rtrfteld . State of Colorado towit: Those certain tracts of land more fully described ir. '•.:.at cer nir. t',0nri dated ATr 1 111 .' i1 11 e ro:; Aurora •. i _� .• - :;.(i•-:)ic.:er r'cordnd in �.00.c ^./%J., o !• ,.,• !. * rte , 014.. Y unt. :t0 ,7.0�. f asement s desribedrlandeof said and premisesasoshown ondaeplat or aplof saidd tobetd right way throughacross the above. :T .deac pmap of linerecorded in the office; of''the County Clerk and Recorder. TOHAVE.AND TO HOLD the same unto the said Rocky 'Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc. its suc- , cessors and assigns, so long as such facilities or any of them above referred to are owned, jope ated or maintained, with the right of ingress and egress to and from said right of way to t mainitain, operate,; repair, alt,er,- inspect, protect, remove, and replace the same. :;The Grantor(s� shall have the use of premises except for any use which conflicts with the purposes for which this right of way and easement is granted. The Grantee hereby agrees to pay for damages to crops ot fences resulting from the laying, erecting,' maintaining,' operating, or removing of said pipe lines and related facilities: said damages, if not mutually agreed upon shall be ascertained by three disinterested persons, one thereof td be appointed by the Grantor(s), one by the Grantee, and the third by the two so ap- ointed and t h award of any two Such persons shall be final and conclusive. Lit ten• uca,.. ,..R <;.*.• +«. ' .. • :,.., .�.:.. ,. ,The Grantor{s shall not build or construct nor permit to be built or constructed any build- '� inp, or,other;improvement over or across said right of way. This easement and right of way '• shall be±,a covenant' running with the• land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the, heirs, successors' and assigns of the Grantor and the successors and assigns of the Grantee ,The.terma and provisions herein contained constitute the agreement or eetweer twhehe thr- ties,andshall supercede all previous communications, representations, r verbal o.r written, between::the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. •r 19 51 dayof . 'Septeiber. ',a., •1• � rad of said Grantoc(s) this � 7tn. 1 N6�S'tlle • a County of. ^,'rr:r i"LCf rtegoing instrument was a6know1odge,t hefort t> t.. '`, 3 .. . • / 4. the THIS DisTRumENT. made chi, i /it dory of ,' ' ' a • .,,,t t., , in y. AI Of rJur ta,111 one thousand nine hundred and /Cif 77 .4t , 72,Zeiv..>) (/1 A fZ,1 "; •.• •_.' t L '..t r-7_, , , 4, /Wore icy" X • ‘,... ',ere,' Ave/. „t• .....,,,„/ 'He rr •-‘ A: , 7 A ,,,' , :, „. . ' .. • .. the_ __, County of COMPANY • of the first part. and PUBLIC SERVICE Mf)i,' ('i thriP.A1)0. a corp.'," I' I .t. .1 .1 ' .. l' l.'• i ,n 1 ,-..i0,11..,„: ' under and by virtue of the lawi of the State of Colorado pl.ty of the ..f.t.,:id 1 Rrt wrrNmETH, That the lief parties ,of the !mart pit" f.“ 4:0 ir ,•,,. 4, 1, I) .111inf (.4Atfrc''0 (2-- .11-f.,(1: —444. -'-"c? //'-‘-''..""4...1.4-0". '''' - `• " ''' i ,, to the said part les of the firm part in hand paid by the iNrtui party of the }4(• ond pait thi ..,•, eipt .41 tio ...or 16 t.1.1f.bV • confessed and acknowleddred, nett granted, barimined, sold arid conveyed arid by thetti• pre,. nts do grant. bargain, sell, convey an confirm WAD the said party of the second part. Its suei egS0t4 WO it:•signs forever. an ..4 easement for the constructIonreconstruction, operation and maintenance of roisitwtors tot the tz,Inmiillo..,,n ,,f electricity. together with the necessary poles, towers, crosearms. cables, wires. guys. supporta*, and other fitiir,s .., . and devices, used or useful in the operation of electric transmission lines through, on fit'el '1Y1,! Eir, 1..444 MP foll..A. ... , ing described hods, to -wit: Lot # L, ... , 14, 15 t all, in Section 1, Township 7 S uth, Range P..9e"\ , rliest, 6tit14ineipal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorndo. M --ore -. ticul,irly 'N. described as follows: A right of way 100 feet wide, 50 feet on each side of a ce.:iter 1:13 Vine begirtninz at a point on the West boundery line and 13 feet northerly from the to Weet Quarter Corner (Brills Cap) of said Section 1; thence S. 77° •--.1 F. 700 teet :no.'" . or Less to the. Oounty road. r•-', Also ower and across Lot.e # 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of' Section 2, Township 7 South,' 'binge 89 West,* 6th Principal Meridian, County of .:Iarfit ld, State of Colorado. More particularly described Ite follows: .Aright of way' 100 f'eet wide, 50 feet on each si.eisof a oenterAl.ne.belginning at s. point on the eftet line and 13 feet northerly frosttholiast gtiarter Minter (Belts. Cap) of Bald Section 2, thence N. 77° c,51 W. .3900 1feeti4ree;;:or /elle ' t0; itlitifilllt,"boundary line of said Lot # 8.,..of Section " - Ale* a tract oU/and,'situate in Lot # 5 of Section 2. Township 7 3 ge 89 rtce a to e 1aotitherly along said Westline of lot # 5 r„, d _, v ,„..[ ','. .-,',-.`411'....4...-.;.,X.1.•• ' ; : \ ,,, 1..'4,`•' '1 i'TI:174.-,Vv.'' 0tr.,,..:;!-:,-,,-,,.,..,,,. , r -..f•:,;:7.-'.-,'-'''',,',,. , i .. . ,.,. . .. i . . , . . -,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,!:.›..L,• -y-7, ,,r,';',Tif.';:5'.7!„):0",Itic,„ , ,,,„, ,,,, ''`' ,. , •,.. .n i 1 144,44,, • 4..-n *.t • .v • tedthe. granin easetot thahall:e:17n'7°:`5t7ua„,,n,,:r!tue:dee'bilatuithn:acgde:st:ierilienitignhellenttvrittota7":4are:serecthin.det ' Mine. • ...... . _ ,,A.M.,,NN„..„„) „,1A,..0..„, •. • /J1O,1,419t:Ce , • . . . , • ,, 'BTAT1OF COLORADO, ' .•,:." ' ., - . eI —CO 44 t,.' ' , co' , ;..i.e.te://r1.1 ' . The toregotng instrument was scimowledged before me this 9111 day of. by ..... -Ft.d,1tte,!tC:----e7..•ivi -.4,.4r-s itivo .070iii3 , L L.c. yr, s ... .0' ' ' . • ' ' ' -- - ... Witness my hand and official seal My coinmisaion expires e....‘C_-t ".., '1 -I, ) A 4 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f hr Unci. i �t na t� oi+tq �y�rt o t}� pn �al��yp s4i m # m4r � hon nei ont�hd n can iderdrt,• 41n dA� �`��TtG CWQ�" sk t�� ..-.42,24.03.1m,..��'�n bond P°'9",'.§,'the ntc' z the re,p ,.h r 16y{� 6 ap;� +a (cy� 5 �euh gra r} �tuYggins o J cctr�t M unto"Yht Mou'rtern.S�a�a S u 4 t� �t e�C C K I ceiPionq ofi etegtabh Aa; n Cotood�q �otacif.0 "541: 9 ' 4th S�reev enver, Co!oeodo, 50202, T414 ae, r c, a ,o � a � Mnx,,e � a•or,e x •do �q ns� a. tl°yh9 o� Woy �a�ameno• d o time. gfror • to tonwt+Ut P,�`gt��•a rMpnlp r�l3i ;} c11ld ti�-Blot! 1, V,C it tri[r+•nuntcgtloll Ond.OP4 , f•ocilstie. aiom Pile Po PrTe 6,� • sped tantcA ;ieo� rc iLrre'7ipgp nvcr Unrde�roM}#iltk�ai" } t{;e • fi 11e;w1n dextrib��l lon� which Grofiegt aw "': 1 1 1 1 • 0 'MAT CLIMATE II The development is located approximately six miles south of Glenwood Springs in the Roaring Fork River Valley. The IIsite is located in a semi -arid climate at an elevation of II approximately 6300 feet. Climate data for this area of the Roaring Fork Valley is not officially recorded. Data used II in this report has been screened and adapted from relevant available information. 1 I The area receives an average of 17 inches of precipitation annually and 65 inches of snowfall annually. Winds are II generally from the Southwest with modifying up -valley day- time flow and down valley nighttime flow. Average wind IIspeed is approximately 8 mph Wind speed can be predicted to reach a maximum of approximately 75 mph on an average of Ionce every 50 years. Temperatures generally fluctuate 30 II to 40 degrees daily throughout the year with January aver- aging 18 degrees F, and July averaging approximately 70 IIdegrees F. Recorded highs and lows for Glenwood Springs are II102 degrees F (1954) and -26 degrees F (1963). II Particulate measurement ranges from 20 to 30 micrograms per cubic meter annual mean concentration and is considered to IIbe at natural levels. Colorado's standard is 45 micrograms II per cubic meter. 1 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 TOTAL PRECIPATION ( IN INCHES) n: a a 1 0 GLENWOOD SPRINGS WEATHER STATION - (1978) AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION 31 90° a4 0° TEMPERATURE W 0 a cc W > a (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT ) JAN FEB. MAR. APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. i -1 1 \ 81 r 1 ---TCMP'EIIATU11C 7 .i' � i \\ i"PREGIK TION 4 b 31 90° a4 0° TEMPERATURE W 0 a cc W > a (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT ) 1 • • 1 HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY The State Historical Society's file does not list any known National Historic Register Site on or adjacent to the property. There is no evidence of any historical or archaeological structure on the site at this time. (See attached letter.) 1 WILDLIFE 1 There are no endangered species located on or immediately adjacent to the property. A letter requesting additional information and management planning assistance was forwarded to the Division of Wildlife on August 15, 1979 (see attached sheet). Comprehensive planning measures are anticipated so that existing wildlife will continue to thrive on site and add to the beauty of the community. Additional wildlife information will be detailed at the time of final platting. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 32 1 :;ENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 August 14, 1979 Historical Society of Colorado 1330 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Ms. Betty LeFree, Reference: Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4, a residential development. I am referring to you a sketch of a proposed development in Section 1, and Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West, of the Sixth Principal Meridian. I would appreciate your reviewing the enclosed sketch to determine if any known or documented historical site, structure, or unusual geological, archeological, or other site exists within the boundaries of, or immediately adjacent to the property. Please send me your comments for our subdivision application to Garfield County as soon as possible. Enclosures 33 Sincerely, Dale L. Lauer P.E. Centennial Engineering, Inc. 502 Main Carbondale, Colorado 81623 COIORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY Date August 17. 1979 Date Received August 17. 1979 The Colorado Heritage Center 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203 This is to acknowledge receipt of Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4 search request. This office conducted a search of the Colorado Archaeological Site Inventory and the Colorado Inventory of Historic Sites, as well as nominations pending or on the National Register for the following area/s: T7S-R89W-Sec. 1 & 2. The result of this file search is checked below. (x) There are no known (x) Archaeological and/or t() Historical/Architectural resources in the impact area of the proposed undertaking. *( ) Information regarding resources known at the present time is attached. These resources have not been evaluated for inclusion in the National Register. They must be considered Eligible until a formal determination has been completed. `( ) Information regarding cultural resources pending nomination to or on the National Register of Historic Places in the proposed project area is attached. Our files are incomplete in this area as the vast majority of Colorado has not been inventoried. There is always the possibility that Cultural Resources exist within the proposed impact area that have not been identified. Therefore, the federal agency is required to conduct a professional survey to Identify any Eligible Cultural Resources in the proposed project area. We anticipate consultation with this office regarding the Effect of the proposed project on any Eligible resource in accordance with the Advisory Council Procedures for the Preservation and Protection of Historic and Cultural Resources (36 CFR 800). Please provide this office with the results of the survey for our review of professional adequacy and compliance. Arthur C. Townsend Bruce E. Rippeteau State Historic Preservation Officer State Archaeologist *Information regarding significant archaeological resources is excluded from the Freedom of Information Act, Therefore, legal locations of these resources must not be included for public distribution. II t.;ENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 1 • . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 August 15, 1979 DIVISION of WILDLIFE 6060 BROADWAY DENVER, COLORADO 80216 Dear Mr. Mel DePra: Reference: Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4, a residential development. I am referring to you a sketch of a proposed development in Section 1, and Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West, of the Sixth Principal Meridian. I would appreciate your (or the Garfield County DOW officer for that area) reviewing the enclosed sketch for any known, documented, or evidence of any, endangered species on the site or within close proximity to the site. Also, I would appreciate a call for a time that can be set up to work out man- agement practices for the existing wildlife. Thank you for your" time and help. Enclosures 34 Sincerely Dale L. Lauer 1 • • 1 UTILITIES Water for the proposed Filing No. 4 will be supplied by existing wells #1, #2, #3, & #4. The existing 8" water ' system will be expanded through Filing No. 4. Two additional ' 60,000 gallon storage reservoirs and one additional pump station will be constructed in the expanded system. Added pump station capacity will be approximately 90 gpm at 317 feet total head. ' Wastewater for Filing No. 4 will be collected by an 8" gravity flow central sewer system and conveyed to a proposed aerated lagoon complex located on a low terrace near the northerly property boundary. The proposed wastewater processing facility ' site application is currently recommended for approval by the Colorado District Health Department engineer and is undergoing ' processing for approval A copy of the site application docu- ment is included in the appendix of this application. iNatural Gas is currently available in adjacent filings and adjacent to County Road 109. ' Electricity is available to the site from both Public Service Company and Holy Cross Electric. Telephone facilities are available in adjacent filings. A ' main trunk line from Carbondale to Aspen traverses Road 109 adjacent to the easterly boundary of the tract. 1 35 • • 1 CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 1 1 WASTEWATER QUANTITIES CRITERIA: 100 GPCD Wastewater 98 Residences 3.2 Persons per Residence 4.0 Peak factor for pipe sizing ' 2.5 F/S Minimum Allowable Velocity 1 QUANTITY: 1 (100)(98)(3.2) = 31,360 GPD 1 RATE: 1 (31,360)(4.0)(6461272) 0.19 CFS 1 PIPE SIZE: 1 4 (1 �) dpipe /—::;:71 d.. (4,1-) o.19) C12.) pipe --, 2 s 1 d .3.8" <. 8" O.K. pipe 1 1 36 111 • • F/GE 94,3 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE Anthony Robbins, M.D., M.P.A. Executive Director September 7, 1979 Westbank Development Co, Inc.- John Huebinger Jr. 0235 Oak Lane Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Site Application No. 3296 for 85,000 gpd lagoon golf course irrigation - Garfield County Gentlemen We are pleased to inform you that the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission approved your application at its meeting held on September 4, 1979 . The following conditions are applicable: This site approval will expire on September 4, 1980 If the construction of the project has not commenced by that date, you must reapply for a new site approval. This approval does not relieve the owner from compliance with all county regulations prior to construction nor from responsibility for proper engineering, construction, and operation of the facility. Very truly yours, Roger H. Smades, P.E., Chief Field Services Section Water Quality Control Division HS:dec CC` Centennial Fnjnparinr5 inc. District Engineer • • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER, COLORADO 80220 PHONE 320- 8333 May 7, 1979 Centennial Engineering, Inc. Centennial Plaza Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Attn: Carl A. Miller, P.E. Re: Site Applications for a Waste Water Treatment Facility for Weatbank Subdivision, Garfield County Dear Mr. Miller: Enclosed is a copy of a site application form and the instruction sheet for a Waste Water Treatment Facility at Weatbank Subdivision. You should also address how the proposed waste water treatment facility will coordinate with the 303 plan (Roaring Fork River Basin Study), the 208 plan and the Carbondale and Glenwood Springs' 201 plans. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 245-2400. Very truly yours, FOR DIRECTOR WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION Leff Richard H. Bowman, P.E. District Engineer RHB / j rs cc: District Engineer Denver Office Garfield County Health Dept. Enclosures 37 1 �o • r 1 CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 July 26, 1979 Mr. Richard H. Bowman, P.E. District Engineer Colorado Department of Health 125 N. 8th Street Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 ' Reference: Site application for a wastewater treatment facility for Westbank Development, Garfield County. ' Dear Dick: Enclosed is a site application; one and ten mile radius maps; ' transcript of pertinent information regarding the treatment facil- ity site topographic map; for Westbank Development Wastewater Tre- tment Facility. If any other information or data is required, please advise me as soon as possible. ' Very truly yours CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING,INC. Carl A. Miller, P.E. Manager 1 1 38 1 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Divisl • 1121U East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 ' APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPD CAPACITY APPLICANT: h/e,s thckrtk. Veve/optrrcri t C c /rtc.t - doh -117 gueb n,”1 c%. ADDRESS: 0235- Oak L t €, G'/eni/ao d c45prlrt_st.; ea SAWQ! PHONE: 50-1,6-:.‘677. Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: eCIt eeving, Cezzferr,T/a/-Plaz4-j Crrhoneia.le., Co. &IC 23 PHONE: ?63-/75 3 A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1. Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage treatment plant on this particular site. This should include, but is not necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development of the site location and service area. 2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed: GPD: 6'6' OOO (gal/day) Type Saks/age- Lagoon. PE design 850 �oersans Present PE capaci ty ("000, 000 6ct,, to be served .SOp Domestic: /00 Industrial:. 0 3. Location of facility: Attach a map (a) 10 -mile (b) 5 -mile (c) 1 -mile of the area which includes the following: radius: all sewage treatment plants and lift stations. radius: domestic water supply intakes. radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent will be discharged: Subsurface disposal: Evaporation: A/p ii re// f /7'0(26 R/4/et (Watercourse) Land: •;aCoy/rse r yaG/O I. Other: State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s): %' —/ 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? 44 6. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? Present zoning of site area? 4 eice/itur Zoning within a 1 -mile radius of Site? F�e�r en/ra /— yriced/rure: -/)id .L.SZ' ' At Con �l/rcaclfi/oit Coisf/t7X17 .CS 9rawe// 4uart7/i /%x/7,4( fr iKfi� czna.( cert dale .ba/c,<1,7/ani are %coifed ctcrass /fie evc - 1 - WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) 39 1 ?. What is the distancelewnstream from the discharge toile nearest domestic water supply intake? rr'/y ZfrSA.5 — 7J'J2 c I' Qgi/4 / 4f 4( (name and address of supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of d1version --1/72/,— e//z/v, Z7,z�� //?IQrr Oil Co- —Bif/F7Ihn (name and address of user) g tz ✓ort d 42r rzy s C�/'t'a ala 8. Who has the respons i bi 1 1 ty for operating the faci 1 i ty? j,,'e6.z4,0 ank .L7eye/7prrte, CO /41C. G' e/T e rl. PA- r �'1 'e t^ ejo Pae b / riq e e 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility wi11 be constructed? We s L ,b art ,tea fz Ch # ( Z 2 cz , Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the proposed facility. 10. Estimated project cost: /5 y PO O Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the faci 1 i ty? 1t/e's1,6(r/1l ./(r „r" *`/ 11. Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. et1Gf/m534pr, a5 �dttiLasrc k5 zc, ?/elz A/a a cad 4Svr' //7 s3, ('QJ a ri (Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? If so, what precautions are being taken? /1/.? (See er, c /Q.7 c c( Con e¢ere Has the flood plain been designated by,the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources? )1/6%5 If so, what is that designation? /ea /cap ,cl06tL /"lv.in 13. Please include all additional factors that'mlght help the Water Quality Control Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval. c5*(.7-C enc/0 ed franscrtp�` WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 - 40 B. Information regarding 141/ stations: /VI I op v S 11 she/ O !? S 1. The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following additional load: Population Equivalent Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served: 2. Is,the site located in a 100 year flood plain? If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. ' 3• Where will the overflow be discharged? 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: II5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the facility to % of hydraulic and ? of organic capacity. C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by I a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: IIPlease address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans including the 201, 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or II questions, please call 388-6111, Extension 378. Recommend Recommend No Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative 1 1 1 1 7/ M Date: District Engineer Action: Recommend Approval: II Date: WQ-3(rev. 1/78-140) ^/e/ /7 1)'/ica��e Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside municipal boundary owithi,n 3 miles, and Sew1 tri Boat'. �. Cdi�r(ty Cp��rni � Err triTR0p M N)AL NAM 2014 Blak Arena Pk (303) 945-725! !!��a�l Health fl r i ty Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 ityfCounty Planning Authority ,,5:1 erf e a s ex C Agency nment State Geologist ,v.c/< .�1-5✓;5"Lc.p�»eTtir igy7atLt e of Applicant Recommend Disapproval: Signature 3 41 • • APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL WESTBANK DEVELOPMENT -- JOHN HUEBINGER, OWNER A (1) The proposed location of the sewage lagoon and facilities is on a bench at an elevation of + twenty five feet below the golf course and residence area and + fifteen feet above the 100 year flood plain of the Roaring Fork River. The location of the sewage facility is ideal in that it allows a gravity flow sewer system with no lift station requirements. It will not be visible to any of the resi- dences of the Westbank Development. There is a possibility the effluent from the polishing pond (No. 3) will be utilized in the golf course irrigation sprinkler system during the summer months. Treated effluent will be discharged into the Roaring Fork River in the winter months. There is no development at present on the bench area being proposed and no development is anticipated. The area to be serviced is all single and multi -family residences which are, or will be, located to the south on an elevated mesa. The existing covenants do not allow any commercial or industrial development. A. (2) Size and type of treatment proposed. The three oxidation ponds proposed will have a total capacity of 1,300,000 gallons. The esti- mated design capacity is based on the following calculations: 250 Residences at 3.4 persons/residence . 850 persons 850 persons X 100 gdc = 85,000 gallons 85,000 gpd X 15 days retention = 1,275,000 gallons 1,275,000 gallons + 7.48 gal/cf = 170,455 cf The estimated area for the ,three ponds is + two acres. A. (3) Maps. (a) 10 mi. radius map - Sewage. Treatment Facilities 1. El Roca Trailer Park (sub surface) 2. Van Rand Industrial Park (U.P.S.) 3. River Bend 4. West Glenwood Springs 5. Sunlight View 6. Oak Meadows 7. Sunlight Ski Area 8. Rocky Mountain School 9. Colorado Community College 10. Rock Gardens Trailer Park (No Name) 11. Town of Carbondale 12. City of Glenwood Springs 42 • • -2- APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL: WESTBANK DEVELOPMENT (b) 5 mi. radius - There are no domestic water supply intakes from the Roaring Form River or other waterways within a five mile radius. (c) 1 mi. radius - Habitable buildings, location of potable wells and approximate indication of topography are shown on the 1 mile radius map. 43 • • CO r? e 0 CL r . /14 P — & , \ , i i r+.1 80 0 o II • Sto er Per /4J e zwis- :'v-. -\,____.,.$41 i -..\,,, _"; tilWamot..iiimexcwillick. vimpac �-fir'"• -'- ��jc7- -3s.6 7 5 C., _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a 20' F /0 fl'/Z/- .88W, . 1 lie /- %•• 4 n I II im2 31t`%'/e I^_\\uho I .4 :kms—...." --\11-7.-11 .-'- ,1 _ih%•"'i.4. I ' „' I yN �,��J b N t, , I ,/�0 I'.,92 y1 .1* oe; I i e1 01� I t• \ ,. 11 \� :, /( 11 , , t 0,: I � R 1 I ' q o c` 1ionalnp i d , 1. 1 t 1•', Ill, G Lake 1 i1.--. 771;,i1 �j I M 1 * I - O r r .y7f M;n• ... . -• 9011,'+• 1. .e ,f,....5 . ., 1 ., '.. 32 .184..: V` )6 �izzir \r4C\ Pe? 10' G IY'c'GLC fl1pl t R.87W. N.(p� I Y Til�O 0 re [ wood Springs Hatchery '5 .T1• II 1 iod Springs I-Sv% t 16 \ 70 I / 71,77,7 1 r� 1, %-iLCi// //CS TO EAGLE Allen 7i 641 t0 f ,,� I t 5hos`• (" .`` • }91 1 T.'-,2-- ______,_ :;':', t ,lSidinpl 4e f 27 / t 3i 1 Q' 69 I( �b � ', ' Gobbler' �'r t` Knob - ` ',- Knob 605432 ,. J +:l e602 IJ 6,0 t � c 4,' .6 • : 71 - - I b /, \ 7y ` w Vurlhu vsl 0 • x Q FI RST1 j 7-:?:1"4- ‘_ unk \,,_ t STAN DA RC or T h,•rt ,.T 1 U '1, U � � e s ,•�\0 I c, a i 4R � 7 6 l3uu(Jrr, , '`t , � �-2;..:-.4.-' �•r. L_ CGi rizily e v,�-T Tunk l. \-`� ,,=;,,,;. I r 6. V4'r bio I ,..f,7::•-;"---'-,-)1". 11{Tunk1 --• 1. IIS \ • 94 •I / .....,#.,.-_,,,...-.J fi�, .,,�I ♦ ..e l 6 j '•I 1°C 11 l�� '�' /7 11 b l 9 I/ to 4(.59.' I1 I— , MTN / 01 /AR COOkO ♦t ,1 y, _ 7'.i GRAND MfSA1 /i,l J ''.11 ppp v..is I' 17 1 Q,. -- _-I 1l leII • i�lf .iJ \ I I 11 Y• _ 14 I it if/"O'�7 (I% ,. •O '-�, 1a \`r / 11 le / l7 to )\ I� CottonwoodPns `\I_ \ I 1f� / // -__ a I o/7Airrs 1'- I / I I el- b:/ —7t -+ i v— -r + • 11 +. t7.c.,,,-...,-- L. / Q�-',282.-Y ' 11• (( 11 i) l.`r/r Hrs1 20 I/9i ll .I!' •pC l`� 1` r l I 19 �I )i 1 • 7.t G / /Buck -- G+ ,11-1.• 1Po1111:Q c. 1 .1•-' f ]911/ y CC n I 1e ��•��` The Eagles Ne eo,J 11114..121r' I,r 1' - 1Ii+-H .V It r \\ vel 4 vh . �vsZ1 I Lr Ctlrc�ilt 29 11�11j{ GI•Awood A,rpo - / C,l l {II • 11 1 1 �u• •• til 1 0 a M -r- rl' 26 IJ ''- I— II + -� •-- — II I I I- // (o' 4 ]! •) 11 iI�}• V "� �. to c.- \ Cern- �v'•T owe �1/11-/gt r1-/� 11 1�• 6 QQ l 4 9 I • 17 a y_ --) 1 010 _+ Ql �`▪ I Y 7:01 to71 K iggin 1Sdny1 Rei HIII I' ,CJ —yl 23 19 1 1 01 211, .I is s. 27 • --;tes — —_ Sun/;gh�}-- f' s� �_--. /�M e x I _ )-�•_� l4 I• ]sem\ j .i I . ,, : I ` 11 ' SUNl7G/•11 Kt 4944 I / /J I ' 4 .1"7- . 1 ,,,- - i 1 „,---0 i 'i I I 7? / I• C , 1 + ...4.::_..7_,_+J 4 Se( , fl,\•\ ' I' ! 10It • T ■ Vii.. ---4+ aI Coat, te'.',• le 14 ll t a C3 ,J'P I �, x el 4v 99 I t. I -11/412 s2eN GJ� O� i b..Ae.;l - tt ..- `,) . spri�og� s. (17' 1 • 72 71 30 14 -77 • • 4\\ C WC 79 y--. 61,/ ♦9. r' VJ .2. — -- to^d.^g . --e Srr, r -I t a -- d `�. 5 J\o l r P i, - 4 17 7 I Vey , 0" ' //y I )L 'i . , le; r Iv II Is J♦°/ •s. 1 I r -/ V ill I , JJ / �..I- -t_)J- ♦r-( 1 C)e� II( I+ 1 x'4 I „ \`i .4 .1. I. o .l rit•-j---.",-14-.--6-: r HOIQe[gl -- J _jtAree l :/ l 1 .. -f- II ,... 1 91 p la --710 31 .90 24 footb.dg; 1 7i'unr Qe 1 \' l:. • 4 ,- -•j -f " —\ r _ I -"a' -�_I I • '�' ,(.,,- i 4 se' 93 'AV* k(. Ih„Tpron Cr 1& , 11 1 Ci4 • ) lI ® I I . w 1.... 6IRIaBeI 4)/ , 1 1454_A I ; i y�e..4'4ik' c,• -k,/ ' 1 I G7. ag ^o SOPR I S d •W▪ C Catherine± '6 Mulford ---a- LAVER /4•V Cnrb-rsii l 11e. +6?Mr• •E / , ; \ I fit ti + 6 xJ 6 Hur,s'c wy 1 J\\\ 4444 -.� 11 I I -fir -.4 15J t 1I 213•;:4.A4. • I �'. I.••u•i.! .� ,I�r•1 7'4"46„,s /4,7,6", -1 _ F n '' I r7/u/u .0 34 ` 1e I Sr6Juhn G.n r /u j 2. l� l'144 UIv.KLE C'„ 1--- t ero-•PG 1 �' I 9. •7 76 e 1 71''' 28 Ho Vuit S rine 2I Res 26 Yr? 155 110/ 1K I WC c,,tl\t -l' i. Spr/n. Pu Reservoir I1 776•! 40 , to • +la Jebel + — Al OPR/S 4O • TREE VR SERV 6 aiding) \ 1• f„ Rod° 0 7o e, 21 / 117 li • I4 11 k,9, I r� if 29 4 760 Lakel • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 13. ti 4 '16 ;e a5 • 1 �76 107°30' R.90W. 10 1 )V Gn�� �`h. i 17_ I 06' S I psJ\f 11 U! tIo----1�I1\—ct ��' — \ •e1i ` U tI20I I - \ viae -1)< \ J •19 I17l 1 1 ] i'° IR _§% W is I • I I it 26 --7••• Sttiltn King V. II, 1 20' r )0 ' I��4' ' ]s 1 ` ]7 • � I II ' ' ,E 1,� C =J.-4- �t \ — -� — _-._ New Caetiet*4.,1111 77I 1 p„ 5 r Conyon Cra.1 1 t Sr600l Chacra 1S,d,n°I Pr 3". Q /5 y.��f R Mountaier9\\ 1 lL� I. N. f� a� — Rid -1 — -;▪ r, 10 1, ' I 1 02 8' 7 e i / '"9 M 10 oi% I .- • I // el Horse:1> x (1 Mountain_ ate, •4 // P 4 r' 8269 is 15 1•CA.. [ I X11 e�\ rter 1 _- x`06 P�Rr7 11 Vii' a // ,ham — - .- i J) 6• \ �=� °. • CP,e4// I. -I ••'y ,, �\ O I 2) 111 ]]a J�I II_re-11 -�I`asM-"- 9. III. II k )I 26 -� 1 70 11� fI 0 \ 32 \ *63 Glenwood' Swing 'fish Hotchry • 34 35 ni CI !a 4k- i. 1 at 29 0I�� 28O- — I 1\ 11 1 - a tt,DA 35 I °h 1 1 I - S, 1) 4' L • it p' ,t s i Pa r / •\fit 1 1 2 11 / \\. frs j \ 6 \ ; 1017 ., Center ,ulch 11 - ``� 1 I ' — • • 11 ' 6 1 Glenwood Springs 17 ti 0 12 10MS76i) V I n South 13 GM��e rayon I - o�( a 177 b � I �ei 34 7. i _ Iii-��-�. • `1 34 I \ ���p �' �t r�il 70 II 70 0 1 /.'//�t111 G1rlCooud Ar r ,.,,All .e I -°- — — ' h , . }, i0,' 17 61'3 V \� 20 \ • 71 IJ •s 31. • 6_ j901 f \ . UMncletn Bob Q� IuGo' Gas n 06 \ I1oo n 0 ms3 I _ Trail a aasaaaz3- 11'w� .� Ir 11 Horse ark. ]5 j0 \ j777y 7] r. 60' + 2 I Hughes \ Re.servor{ 19 2fahla 1 9 II 1_ Little Baldy•', 30 / Mtn9• 'I 1 fit•-� 76 IF 1• J 1! 1'31, 74 Sunlight Peak 0603 1/4 r• 6 1 \-iC Stock �CwTond Mine 1- Radio ]0 •J 1 21 .`\l '�Aiwoo 1t11 .o1 `° 7! 370 � )i • i ]9 6-§ ,. • I 1. .. 1 - j •,)• i -z3.,---... 76 CL -7 ^j � ' - 1T ,7 "� is 1,\.tc7R1 J2 a '" '.''Bald Mtn ' G IM I'. 0, SUNLIGH KI .0(1 0011.}. ..�1- --� -- . ' 1'))3�J--O\tt (`., \\`1.I 4 t... • ICO'', I I• 1 ,t' L/1 -/ FJ •. II 'I I 1r — --- —+; /ir�+ 92 f,1\‘‘ / 22 • Gos i PrP,.\\ Cr]]'y 0 ‘l;'io1 n � 011 orvloc„flagpole I -r1 t Inwnr 1� n1,ha�\ - • I n I I ItirOn n r�1 3/ ti ' Go 1 6 • Gas G0, I I fi��s� Ro j9 �. idd l '1 \ I 1017 ® l's•c1 ' 209 I • ^�6 } \\ � I-1 ��,. 1� � I I �w1�IE �s \ I to , •`11 1, q kUf e f9� ; Io I I, c. %r '� ' `� ^dote ' 16 .GARFIELD_ • `I I` MI T ( `• � I1. .:,D'l •� �, . Y 1,,,rSO.�.n.o 1MIOOLI ' X276' .e• o — IA t7 C !‘..• .' I . 19 �. . I v� \ yy, tl' r r li--' � tT-'+ � 16�� 1s \ C°:1 ', 1! 1 Id6 MESA 9O \ PITKIM.. CO I f ��'• I w, I! i. 'x , Sen A Q �x -c] ova ]. (} 1 \ _. / Ir �C 1 • ILy ( 21 •• sPn„B,, Oa 19 1i 70 -v. 21.-- 1 !! I' 73 11'1, I �1' 19 , I' L 0911 n.. I ?I - I t 2 Cf 0, 4,01 1. 3 10.4 34 NZ rho n; IS It 5_Q wJ • 1 1 1 �;Q34OQ : • 105 • r; 1 1 t••.(,: ri 1 ef' 4 • +•. ' Cable Television service for the area is not planned at this time. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT IMPACT OF UTILITIES: Since water and sanitation services will be provided by existing and planned central systems on site, no measurable impact is ex- pected from either. Other services or utilities such as electri- city, natural gas, and telephone are available. Their continued long term availability may depend upon the availability of adequate energy supplies and the policies of the supplier. IMPACT ON POLICE PROTECTION: Responsibility for police protection resides with the Garfield County Sheriff's Department and is expected to remain there unless perhaps the Westbank area were incorporated. Since project development will be relatively slow, the project as it progresses is expected to have only a nominal impact on the Sheriff's Department. Total impact for the completed project is estimated at one additional response each week. ' 47 • • IMPACT OF FIRE PROTECTION: ' Westbank Ranch is located in both the Glenwood Springs Fire Protection District and the ' Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. Run time for either District is estimated at ' to minutes Both Districts have equipment ' capable of handling foreseeable emergencies. (See attached letter). IMPACT OF CIRCULATION SYSTEM: ' Streets will be designed based on standards by Garfield County. Maximum grades will be 8 per cent, and minimum grades 0.5 per cent, with a tright-of-way of 60 feet. All streets will be surfaced with an asphaltic material. 1 ' Street names are as follows: o Garrison Road 1 o Tower Road o Cimarron Road 1 CLIMATE IMPACT: The proposed development will not significantly ' modify air quality or temperature for the region, nor will the climate itself have an adverse impact ' on the proposed development. Local humidity may 1 1 48 1 • 1 be very slightly increased during dry summer months due to local irrigation of lawn and park areas. However, this increase is expected to be locally beneficial if measureable. 1 1 1 DEVELOPMENT PHASING Since all proposed units will be residential, the developer intends to begin development immediately in that area adja- cent to existing Filing No. 2 and Filing No. 3 in 1980. Development of the upland terrace is anticipated to occur P P p 1 as a second and possible third phase during 1981 and 1982. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49 il III 110 1 1 ilMEMORANDUM RE: OWNERSHIP AND FUNDING OF DEVELOPMENT COSTS 1 WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1 LIMITED is the record owner of 1 the property known as "Westbank Ranch." WESTBANK U DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. will be the general managing partner. 1 The shareholders of WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1 LIMITED will 1 supply the financing necessary for the development of II Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4. Sincerely, 1 II John Huebinger President IIWESTBANK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. 1 1 1 1 I50 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ • EXHIBIT "A" SUBDIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHICH THE SUBDIVIDERS ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE IN THE WESTBANK RANCH FILING NO. 4 ARE AS FOLLOWS: ITEM APPROX. QUANTITY 1. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Clearing & Grubbing 11.0 Tree Removal 2.0 Excavate, Spread & Compact 72,000.0 Rock Excavation 1,000.0 Prepare Subbase 11,150.0 8" Base Course 11,150.0 1" Chip & Seal Pavement 11,150.0 20' Bin Retaining Wall 190.0 16' Bin Retaining Wall 50.0 14.7' Bin Retaining Wall 180.0 4' Bin Retaining Wall 100.0 2. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 36" CMP 24" CMP 24" CMP Elbow 18" CMP 18" CMP Elbow 12" Riprap 3. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 8" ACP Water Main 6" ACP Water Main Fire Hydrant Assembly 2" Blow Off Assembly 8" Gate Valve & Box 8" Fitting 6" Gate Valve & Box 3/4" 0 Service Lines 8" Connect to Existing ACP Pump Station 90 gpm @ 317' Head) 60,000 Gal. Water Storage Tank (Elev. 5910) 60,000 Gal. Water Storage Tank (Elev. 6390) Pressure Test 4. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 8" PVC Sewer Main 4" Sewer Service Lines 4' Manhole (Under 15' Deep) 4' Manhole (15' & Over) 4' Drop Manhole 44.0 194.0 4.0 448.0 6.0 30.0 4,990.0 3,240.0 11.0 1.0 8.0 17.0 2.0 79.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 11,470.0 79.0 32.0 15.0 3.0 5. WASTEWATER PROCESSING FACILITY UNIT Acre $ Ea. C.Y. C.Y. S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. Ea. L.F. Ea. S.Y. L.F. L.F. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Lump Sum Lump Sum Lump Sum Ea. L.F. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. UNIT RATE 250.00 200.00 2.00 10.00 0.70 3.00 2.00 480.00 340.00 280.00 26.00 45.00 32.00 350.00 26.00 300.00 15.00 10.00 7.00 1,000.00 400.00 600.00 120.00 450.00 140.00 500.00 6,000.00 14,000.00 18,000.00 1,000.00 9.00 150.00 900.00 1,200.00 1,500.00 1.0 Lump Sum 60,000.00 STREET IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TOTAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM TOTAL WASTEWATER PROCESSING FACILITY 51 PROJECT TOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY GRAND TOTAL TOTAL COST $ 2,750.00 400.00 144,000.00 10,000.00 7,805.00 33,450.00 22,300.00 91,200.00 17,000.00 50,400.00 2,600.00 1,980.00 6,208.00 1,400.00 11,648.00 1,800.00 450.00 49,900.00 22,680.00 11,000.00 400.00 4,800.00 2,040.00 900.00 11,060.00 1,500.00 6,000.00 14,000.00 18,000.00 2,000.00 103,230.00 11,850.00 28,800.00 18,000.00 4,500.00 60,000.00 $381,905.00 23,486.00 144,280.00 166,380.00 60,000.00 $776,051.00 77,605.00 $853,656.00 G. • SUBDIVISION GARFIELD County Date A gust 24, 1979 Subdivision Name: WFSTRANK RANCH_ FTI TNG NO_ 4 SUMMARY F0410 Type of Subdivision Request for Exemption Preliminary Plan Final Plat Filing Location of Subdivision TOWNSHIP 6S;7S Owner(s) NAME ADDRESS Subdivider(s) NAME ADDRESS Designer NAME ADDRESS Type of Subdivision xxx RANGE RqW SEC. 35,36; 1, 2 Westbank Ranch No. 1 LTD 235 Oak 1 ane, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Westbank Development Company Inc. 235 Oak Lane. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Centennial Engineering Inc. _502 Main Street, Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Number of Arca % of Dwelling Units (Acres) Total Area (xx) Single Family ( ) Apartments ( ) Condominiums ( ) Mobile Home ( ) Commercial ( ) Industrial 98 N.A. N.A. Street Walkways Dedicated School Sites Reserved School Sites Dedicated Park Sites Reserved Park Sites Private Open Areas Easements Other (specify) Greenbelt Piihlir open 'pace Total 44.05 16.49 13,53 5.07 3.40 1.27 0.17 0.06 16.80 6.29 2.11 10.79 187.07 70.03 267.13 100.00 Estimated Water Requirements 62,700 Proposed Water Source (4) Existing Wells Gallons/day. Estimated Sewage Disposal Requirement 56,500 Gallons/day. Proposed Means of Sewage Disposal Central wastewater facility ACTION: Planning Commission Recommendation Approval Remarks Date Disapproval ( ) , 19 Board of County Commissioners Approval ( ) Disapproval ( ) Remarks Date , 19 52 • 1 • e 1 1 1 1 1 WESTBANK RANCH FILING #4 1 DRAINAGE REPORT 1 1 1 1 1 1 JULY 1979 1 PREPARED 1 FOR 1 WESTBANK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INCORPORATED 1 1 1 53 JOB NO. 9036 ' JULY,1979 WESTBANK RANCH FILING #4 DRAINAGE REPORT I. SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF REPORT: ' THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS TO DETERMINE INE THE DRAINAGE ' REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF WESTBANK RANCH FILING NO. 4. THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE BASED ON ' COMPUTATIONS FOR PEAK RUNOFF FOR A 2 -YEAR AND 50 -YEAR ' FREQUENCY STORM. COMPUTATIONS IN THIS STUDY ARE PREPARED GENERALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRITERIA BY GARFIELD COUNTY ' AND THE URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL BY DRCOG. II. SITE DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN SECTION 1, AND SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST, OF THE ' SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF ' COLORADO. TOPOGRAPHY AT THE SITE IS THAT OF THREE DISTINCT GEOLOGICAL CONFIGURATIONS: A MODERATELY SLOPING LOWLAND FLOOD PLAIN PRIMARILY OF VERY COARSE GRAVEL CURRENTLY FULLY VEGETATED WITH DOMESTIC GRASSES; A STEEPLY SLOPING EROSION ZONE VISIBLE AS THE SLOUGH EDGE OF A LATERAL MORAINE ' SPARSELY VEGETATED WITH EVERGREEN SPECIES, SAGEBRUSH, AND NATIVE GRASSES, AND COMPOSED OF WELL ROUNDED VERY COARSE TO ' FINE GRAVEL; AND AN UPLAND BENCHED AREA OF SLIGHTLY GRADED SAND TO SEVERAL FEET DEPTH, WELL VEGETATED WITH SAGEBRUSH AND NATIVE GRASSES. SEVERAL INTERMITTENT DRAINAGEWAYS ARE 1 54 ' VISIBLE IN THE STEEP EROSION ZONE AS SHARPLY "V" SHAPED VALLEYS EXTENDING INTO THE UPLAND BENCH. ALL STREAMS ARE INTERMITTENT, AND NORMALLY FLOW ONLY DURING SPRING SNOW MELT OR DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY PRECIPITATION. TOTAL ' ONSITE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 98.0 ACRES. CONTRIBUTING OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 62.2 ACRES. A TOTAL ' ELEVATION DIFFERENCE ACROSS THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY ' 358 FEET. A MORE DEFINITIVE MAP IS PRESENTED IN FIGURE #1. III. GENERAL: DESIGN OF THE SURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM WAS BASED ON THE RATIONAL METHOD OUTLINED IN THE URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL BY ' DRCOG. AN ONSITE INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTY WAS MADE TO ' DETERMINE THE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS. THE 2 -YEAR AND 50 -YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITIES WERE USED FOR THIS STUDY WITH CALCULATIONS BASED ON DRCOG CHARTS WHERE CHART RANGES PERMITTED. CONCENTRATION TIMES AND INTENSITIES WERE CALCULATED FOR BASINS EXCEEDING THE ' RANGE OF THE CHARTS. IV. DESIGN CONDITIONS: THE FOLLOWING DESIGN CONDITIONS WERE MAINTAINED IN THIS STUDY: a. RAINFALL INTENSITY 2 -year 1 -hour 1 0 in/hr 50 -year 1 -hour 2 45 in/hr b. Infiltration Vegetated area 0 95 in/hr Paved area 0 10 in/hr ' 55 ii III IIM lic. Frequency factor(Cf) Up to 20 Years 1.00 II50 Years 1.20 V. EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE FACILITIES: ' AT PRESENT THE RUNOFF FOR THE UPLAND BENCHED AREA GENERALLY SHEET FLOWS FROM OFFSITE SLOPES ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, ' ACROSS THE BENCHED AREA, BECOMING CONCENTRATED INTO STEEP "V" SHAPED DRAINAGEWAYS WHICH THEN TRAVERSE THE STEEP MORAINE ' EDGE AND OUTFALL ONTO THE LOWLAND FLOOD PLAIN AREA, THENCE ' SHEETFLOW ACROSS THE LOWLAND AREA OFFSITE, AND ARE PARTIALLY CONCENTRATED INTO VERY MODERATE SWALES. AFTER DEVELOPMENT, DRAINAGE WILL BE GENERALLY INTERCEPTED BY THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND CARRIED ALONG UPPER ROADSIDE tDITCH CHANNELS TO PROMINENT DRAINAGEWAYS, THEN CONVEYED ' BENEATH THE ROADWAY BY DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, WITH DETENTION PONDING PROVIDED UPSTREAM AT ROADSIDE FOR FLOOD CONTROL. STEEP AREAS WILL REMAIN UNALTERED EXCEPT FOR ACCESS ROAD GRADING. ACCESS ROAD CUT AND FILL AREAS WILL BE REVEGETATED. VI. CONCLUSION: ALL RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE HANDLED IN ' ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN. SURFACE FLOWS ' ARE CHANNELIZED ALONG UPPER ROADSIDE DITCH CHANNELS TO MIN- IMIZE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS. THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS WILL BE 1 SET HIGH ENOUGH WITH RESPECT TO THE DRAINAGEWAYS SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO THREAT OF INNUNDATION FROM A 50 YEAR STORM. t 1 56 • • VICINITY MAP SCALE -I"= 2000' FIGURE #1 CENTEIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48T NUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 JOB NO. 9e).?h CLIENT W6S j/,� Z644 -}T //tic, DATE • PAGE / OF /1 JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE )4/6-s r17.4.,/K /<4/1../ C- /4/ "47Z_ //t_/ .✓� . 7---/6- SUBJECT .r/C' //JA 'Gr S7 C/ 'V BY .QG L CK' D BY C.4 L C L_,/G_!J T/ o /✓S ,C7c= s/�.✓ -57-"C)/2///S ` y,e, /) p/E'C a 2)',.4, -C</6 -CZ, C_�x/,v7 y „M.4i-1.46 C/`/T /A. /e.4 77 J4 C_ ,r,e/I,/t„/LA C. 9 ��� d.� /C !.0 iv 6047,' /4416D C a = a. /s „41)//2,47.,-• //v J „ ..t/.�-4(i,✓/,,,/2) ,E' G~ 7 Q,/-' 6/V 772 /413'/- 7 ,) /,.J 44c • - rr Cf - 6/2_0;aGt'E-r✓cAy `i4e2 /. 2 G0 e Sb 7/ 1. WA/476. aS / TG O/a4 /..4,4"E ( ce` T.c"Lo/<% .¢T" ,0,e-4/0 44de ,es',4SrnJ 1, .9,✓v /LJC,t/,y' ,421 7— ee..•4i To 77444 7 a, , 7-7 ry W,1!/c',/ /)JS 4I ? 6-,q 4, G, C .) . Tom?L = /60, Z C= o./s .L = 43ocn/ S = /2.32 ,QC�c�rs' ,QcS .4cc4==$ cz=o./S Cc:Az/ -71= a. 7w V = lq.S FIs o. 3 c, /'d//�,C �� = /. , 3 /N///AZ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CENTE/IAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48T ENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE OF // JOB NO. 90. =eco CLIENT h/.,f,sf�t�/✓/.: /,j(". DATE JOB TITLE/ SUB-TITLE �Sj l;��/� ,e,QA}G///4./`i /ddb. 4- S UBJ E CT _SUBJECT AnC-L)/A),4e . -z z) / BY L CK' D BY 2. /7 7g 4)z = (o, ' /)(/ a)(3',)(/G O. = /2. / CFS (a, /J( Z)( /1 )(/O, z) = : 4/ , 14 „ 2 . ,4 = o. 36 ,4c,' ,-S C/-= a 9S' Cc.= c2 / 674 / .4ce S C2= /S- 7 7',c7 , = /297 ,' ,e6s _ / S = / 7 C = d, /S Z�c _ ie/.d _Lz. = o,7/ /, 90 cp` - (o, 4(4p, �/) (// /. sa �Sv _ (0, /E2xi z) (/, 90) (/4 :?-7)= 9 / ,4L L of ,1�,4s /A) "3" /o- S 9, /9i //, /5.4Y L) ,442 ,4i .= 2.34 ,4c46 -Y 1E4:4.774 rev ,44 q 4z. = 49 95 c,C V c'z - o . is - T 7 = S3.3/ ,keccs ,G= 290 c-_,/ S = 2 S o./s = /zz,41/"./ = a c4c.) = O. GO/,t)/We = /. 49 /•"//.e GQZ = (o, 2 ok/, vo) (o, o) (.6 3 /) — 6.4 a c,�S CS?sa.= (9, Zo) (/ z ( /•`'�-CiSs',si) _ /9, 06C/cS' CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 4B ENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 . PAGE 3 OF // JOB NO. 9.036 CLIENT WEST,G3.4'n. ,- '✓i-0O3°,W/1/7"Ca, /nh'. DATE JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE ��-�� %E! ie4,,/G / /G/Z-/ /4/ No. 4 - SUBJECT 4. BY .OGL. CK'D BY o� '' AZ eS C'o.v?72 / ae./77 JJ Z 4 $4 JS 7 4/8, .a,4 -v .o A.e6,9 ,4 = /, 22 /1e61*/ ,4L sr. 92- AcAce C' 4S- /4= -- s/4= s3, kit A60.44 = 2 Z oc m S /S % c = c:3 6Z -z_ = (0.)11.oc)V.c,7.49(SS. 14) Q[so ((7.r) 0)( v.n)( sI 145 = 14,0 is1/41 -14 = o. 4-o .�: Z = o . 49 i,✓/412 .s.� = I%//.t/k. 13."16 CFS '. Ate(. ©BP1/4Slr.1 "S al -u coN-rK.ie(.1-n,JG B/1K) 461, PAvE;D AREA. 4,‘ = c).32___ACQE-S Cc=o.9S •) Jr CC,= . . I�, Vs4E.-i).- .b MGA i\ -i. _ 9. -3 I XceES Cz.z-- D. I s s= /9% Zec = a,41- /1/%/.J ,osS V= 15-.4 F� tiZ = o, C" I-.))�R Z.3S 1►J�11fC. (Sk-L._ (n, g l0.00)Co,9SX�.G3� = 1,6c CFS I CENTEalIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. • 17105 WEST 48T ENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 PAGE ¢ OF /1 JOB NO. 9D.� CLIENT k�b" 72.?4rJ%e ��f�z"E.�(J/4/L ,,,t.i Co, /,c,/C• DATE -2_..7- 79 IJOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE WWF--,STj, ,1,1X- fi,/l/C',.4.,% /C/G//✓ " 4J ' SUBJECT ,,,./2/41/A )46rze 2y BY ,QGL CK'D BY 1 /47LL Oy .6-5,4s//l) ' , '. /-5.2e-v • .1 C '4 4 = o, 4s /c,cEs C, = o, 9s- 1 &67, 72z3 �i /'�4 ,QL ` 4,41 ,4�2‘--S Ca. = a, / s _ . o. 2 2 1 7r1c. ,44z 4,146-s L=. 4'' ' S = :2_ z Z c= a, /sill Za.= z/ /1,12,1-V - a..3 2. y= /9,a/7S. 1 ...c.' -z,= /. 9 3 /u/46e _L5 = 4, 73 /iv/%‘✓.1 Z 6?Z ._ (o. z z)(/. 00)0 93) (44-92) = 2.09 cLs 1 �s�= (D,22)(/.z4))(L,7.j(4,9z) 6'. /4 S G-... 06';4/ s, ti) '7". r.4✓. d �4.E-'Eft ,6 = ©, 4.8 c, = o. � �Cc= Gb/� ,4,r. ,4z = 42.a4 � i� s C'z = o. /s I 4 = 42. 9z 4c„eE s L = /Goo' .S = /S % =.-o, /S' c...-=-• //i✓!/A.I. =0.40 Y= /3. q ----C... z = c=1, / /,v////4/2 1 - SSo= /• - /41 CpZ 44.,4 6/>(42.9z) = 4,/9 C,S (©. /(/. zo)(/ s4 -)(42.9z. = /Z. 6 9 G,CS CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48T11, NUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE S OF // JOB NO. L� 0 6 CLIENT ,04.3Tv6Q„l/C'' /4-9/),,t77". ("<:•:). DATE 7-2 3-191 JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE YV6 j �e4A.IK /4-)ReA.,G,L/ �Lj�,/1 A.16< SUBJECT , JA 4"E Srur>Y BY ! GC, CKD BY cJ , ,44—c_. o 4 Z//eti /4:4 ✓. z: 4e!4 /1i = Ov' = .=19.2'% Qc-•�cCS d, Cc.=o, 3/ = 3, /'J ,�c,et S Cz 7q L 4 = .3. 91- QceeS Z. 3`% C= ©./S Zt.= 3 - Alm) "J/44e. ,c. so = _3, 42 /A.1 /.41.e G?z = (e,,3/)( OD) (/. 4/.3. 14) _ /. % 2- CGS cs?. a = � 2, 3/) (/. z)(3,96)(3 524).= S./o C,�S 42.4s/A.) "9'. Ai2= 1/&7Z ,4d-paa Q z = 2s7SZ. ,4-e4C-S -7-0,7-4 L 4 = 2 G. o ,4c.,eES .L = '700' 4S= 4-4 4Z 4S'o c',= o.is Cc= 40./6 c:./S ihc = 3 ? Ai/n) 77. ,430 V= Z. c.P, 9 A - S. =3�/ (v, /L,)(/. x)(4'/ij2 G. c) = &./6 c.�S (a,/6)(AZ o)0,6/)(2G, o) = /8. vz Gies CENTElkIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48T ENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE <q OF // JOB NO . 90 3 6 CLIENT / S7y,4A,, LkIf <Pe J AJ7 r , DATE - z., 3- j JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE `/I S7-,[4'// ,P,QA/Ce4/ /(41, •� SUBJECT ./)4?Q/A), 4 £74/e1.>' BY ,431 4 CK' D BY /4", ,6,4 s /4.) Ce7,v7,L: /77,1J ,Ce41/43,,J i/ �/yEv ,47,e&.4 -4/ = 1. 40 Y&4- 464 47. = 7. G / �Qc.e4S 02 -- o,/s Cc = o. 2 q _77__ , = 9 o / Ac,e�S S= //% C..:. o./s— �l = .030 V = /3,7/S = cam. 9 4 /A✓//R = 2.33 /�///,e Z. ArC(©, 2'7)(/# 00) (o, ¢�(9, o/) Z. 2.9 e,Ls ICS;) 57) = (oz7)(/. z4)(2 -33)(4? -4 = G• 90 CLS //. /0,9 ✓.J �,e�-4 ,Q, = o. G / o. 9s" ,4.-,4 Az = 4. o / ,Qc .'6-S C2 = v',/ S- 7 ' C_. 4 _ .'.4)Z ,e,e& s �= /!v'7o C.= d,240 t . = 2 7 /Y7//t) 'N= 3a '/ �� , $ Fs .�:.Z = /.6a /A)/N2 --i,. sA 3,3-) /u/y4. QZ = (0.2.6)(4-40)( /.4e)(4,6z.) . 2.4)2 CdcS �sa= (0,2.4.)(20)(3.37)(4.4.2) 4. )C. C.4 G 3 0.26 CENTEIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 19 ENUE WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO 80033 JOB NO . 9t7 3 CLIENT `/C/e S T,l�,4N,' ZLrr..,6e()XWG67t17- CO, /DATE JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE / ST,C:4,j/ / ,44...r''/ /474/Air /(%Q, !SUBJECT ,Q,f.4/,�,41C S77�•t9 y BY ,OGL CKD BY • PAGE 7 OF // em- .e/C,4 1)/5C//,4'.el 1 W,4/o G c �i T� /J/ ?,�Ji,J.4 E ��,c r t �1 - �.E,4 rnJ.4l 4)/4//C/ ,'-S z ' 5.'r� «' / 4 tel, B, a ). ,4l /6c2, Z ,4te,ez-s C . o, /5- L - 4 ov 1 S.. /Z,3Z t� = Z. 2. 4 / /f/.1J -, z = � 67.3 /.>J///.R. 3, 4. 4, = (a /.$)(i z eX/ c).�) '/60, 2, = 2 B.4sinJ X13 /f9Lu S G�o,+J �,c3c �Ti.✓� .�.4sr•✓S 9 /d //, A- s3, 3/ A/CteG-S C = o. /S L .::/9' S z,s-90 Z` - = /Z Z /1!/,t% �-c� f/sa = / 49 ,,l/A4 �G L raiz= As --)6/ 2_c) 3/) _ /S/. 30 CAS G , ,9= �•9Z .4cos-s CL= 4od s'= z4•*io = 4,73/Ai/,1/4 Q,14.57) .sk,c 2o,(4 23,,(4'. 9 z) = Q. /9 c,es ,1t-4 - o,/Zif ,A) "_7 /41 42,9 C= ®,iS G=/60z, //‘., .�sY�� .�c�.✓s n = /. S4 /.J/X/.c .WSJ _ (en,/s-XA o)e. s -4-k4" 4 zJ = S_ /�90 /iqe)c-/S' CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48*ENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE 8 OF // JOB NO. 96 6. CLIENT 1/\/_5 ,Z V Lc?/ t/l7 Cn A.) C . DATE 7 z 4 - 7? JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE k/E.sT'i.-,,.an/A: ,C,,i.c./C,'/ ,l—iG/�� �/�- q -- SUBJECT STu" Y BY CK' D BY M /aGC/_S Ga,,,/7/434 77,/4- .4-4S�iJ // ,9 = � o / ,�t c.�� S C = a, / S Z. = 900' S Z`c.. _ 6 $ /4v,v s�s� _ x.33 /,J///•e. C;i7s6—' (o, /s)(/, Lo,(z, 33)( 9. D /J .= 3, 7,,g G.�S 52D YE4�/ r ,Cis/% (/GGL, .,/c/G A771/4- //,e4.., (4,72 ti/l ZD 40 bO /vo / 4-c=. /80 220 C,‘,/ -7: G7,/S C-.0 _ e, . a/ C4 _ /. 2Ca 4 = /lmd, ,4G>6W.5 /x0 /¢v =20 4.83 3,20 2 .a2- / , -/, 7/ /. 3S /8 /.4:23 CC -L. A' (/. 20,(x:/�c. �N = 28. X36 �. Qa 4ccu,yucA rivE = 2 6, 836(.<i)(7.1.14) Qb = (O. 2 /)(/• 2 0)(,-c'_) (/G D, z) Qt. = 40.37 mac: Qo,4cc.cdAle/ LAr-/v = 40,37( )(r .) J L (28, s3)(/zoc) = /6/.5'3 (2-S. 2.34 zo)(2400) =22/,460 (26. 63C2 )(2.46 )(3Goc) = 255, 37/ (ZS, 836)(2,0 ) S c) 279, 5-9 (2 °, 6'36 )(/• 7 /)(Goon) 2 95, BS7 (2.43, g343S o4ap = '3Z7, oeno 7_8,53' //8 O�fO "0 .367, 4,66 (2.5 .;c0 /•o3 C/32oo� 392 °S4- i LL�Y�LOi"� 0 (4a. 37)(4.8.3)2�� = 2 33, 981- (4a,32) (3.20)060).= 3/0, 04/ (40.37 )(2.46)(3600) = 35'7, Si 7 (40.37x?,°Z)0500) = 39/,427 (40.37 )(/ 7/ )(GS.5) = 4/4, /SIG (40,3?(L3s ?4 = 457 794 cC40.37 1,16 /0,903 = S/4447.f A d, s.? 1.03 32.5 = S¢ g70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CEN'T'ENNIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. �J 11405 WEST 48T NUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE OF // JOB NO. 'O 36. CLIENT W6'$ -276;4h/& Z'Z%4-ZO/a��it%7~ CQ. /Ai DATE %-z4 - 7? JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE l�1/E s 7-Z #4,tiX , "atv / /C'e,J ( ,S/o. 4 - SUBJECT - SUBJECT 2)/2 4,J,44j 6 s7 --e../ 4)/ BY ,DG C.. CK'D BY /AJ .QE C1,) G/ /.Q E. /Y%6rv7 .S ,4/2E OE�e / U�.a �.•eo/yJ e-t/AJCIe ,E'tC.cJ e4.6s 4 S S',4,16w/,/ 7-7,/ 4s/A) 2) /S' 4 S eQ ?'o y& .4 /Z .S// s7-o/e/C-.4 L ,e-/1) 47— 4 84 /f.) Co/VG67're4T7o# 77/4496 Dim 220/ti/el. v) 0 0 Vat PCR FI. -04.i S1-0R\CA, l.. Ft -or&) _ s4g,8')0 Fri P= ISC, GIC Ca.FT Poo ► oust- Ft -v W RA`r QP i tzzo = B97-cS4 +(2 zoXi.e) 29.1 cfS 1 , 1 Izo I Geo ioo 24c 2$o o CENTEIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48TH NUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE / OF // JOB NO. 6, CLIENT Vi -c T 4eL,4/i47 J7 Ce) //1JC, DATE JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE / C= 5.; 7-64 ,1JJ /e4, J c -b/ /-/c). 4e_ SUBJECT ,D/2,4434G,'E , 7--/a y BY ,De- CK'D BY 7-4-79 i Pc�.✓..D/,LJI £E cp e../ /A2 T /7= /s-, F'/6 ( 3v�X3cxD h /.2 X'/Z = 8/000 So X /oo X 2. (:) X '/ = S 9oa Z/ac X /D.ox '/2 = /2. Soo 2 S y/ 00 K S- d X //2 = 6 L $'o 4 X /oo X /o. o k //a = 20 oocc So x /sox / oc7 Bo X /oo X 4. ox % a oC�c� /6 4 vsrc, CU,. FT. L L o W /4 /3 L: i7/ 5 C//.4. ' c''E Q,o= 29.7 2f S QN,4 _ zo)(/03)(//,20) = 2, d8 CLS CR4/6' = (o. /S)(/ z (/, 03) ( /. 7/) C�Hc = `©./s) xz_ (/. o?, (/ 69) -- C.). 3 / 1{ ,444-ot...),1 cqP -6:)A44-821/6,- XC.. CPW-1 o t<4I Ce = 2 9, 7 -2,08 - c",32 - D..3/ qa co w,t C C.e cc_ Z . 99 c/4.5 c'LS CENTEIAL ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48TH NUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • PAGE // OF // JOB NO . 9Q CLIENT W6: Tp..,,�I.�l,�.' ,d, '�--/f 6 7/-wp-/% -Ccs. DATE JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE 7- /2'- 75' !r/L 7--.6:4,16‹ /K t/C2, '- SUBJECT Q, ,4 /,VM BY .OG (,_, CK' D BY .P.G EAS)k) !Jam SN vwrJ NGS 'T1>E -r-c> P Arilp APPR,oX1MA.-rC- ©t= c_4\ V. E. SPE. cT1 OC) O %<, CIKCLE_S 1�EP� ���E �1 be..'T07-I00 Lii✓v1/6L ,o6Z, ,Q/So. z A. A. CS C= /s" /4S, 2 /7e -,,e6 G= /4/26.---->4 /2'c2 Ac/e& /60, t. Cc = 26, .0 S 3, 94 42 `q2. /1. 9-7 4 i2' So 06(:). 2 ,4c . c4z / cFs d� n, = 4/. 6 cc.: 2 9 7c,S cFS 11 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OVERLAND TRAVEL DISTANCE, IN FEET • 60 5 40 0 • • U • :..,,_ IF RN Jr r Affir : . . ,z, $ ,, #, I - e Airrid,\: '0 I ' iv r rry Ari: 1 A Or .--- ...". , 4Dirv',-,-° 793 _,,, .,/ Fierio 4601.,..., p.44 . . _.._:_ ..„•••01 ,_......w;lai. 1 24 0.93 1i 0.95 IN MINUTES OVERLAND TIME MINUTES ti RELATION OF OVERLAND TIME OF TRAVEL TO • OVERLAND TRAVEL DISTANCE, AVERAGE OVERLAND SLOPE, AND COEFFICIENT C. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c es 'o z w I— z z II 10 ITITTTTTT1TITITTT TiTI7TITTITI7II:I.TIUU 50 60 70 80 90 DURATION (M n.) 100 YEAR 50 YEAR 25 YEAR 10 YEAR 5 YEAR 2 YEAR 140 n■.n...u■■■■n.■■■■■.■■.■■■.■■■■■■■..■■.■.....a.■■u■■■■.■■.■.■■..■.■.■.■■ ■..�N��.....■....■../t■....■■■.■.....■.■t.■.....N.■..�������������./■fit../�� _____, .. . __ _ - _ r I —_ __ .._. __4.1 _:_._ _ T n CZE _^. 50 60 70 80 90 DURATION (M n.) 100 YEAR 50 YEAR 25 YEAR 10 YEAR 5 YEAR 2 YEAR 140 • 1 • WESTBANK P.U.D. REVEGETATION PLAN In a mountain development such as Westbank Ranch P.U.D., a successful revegetation plan will be one that imitates the • existing landscape elements. Revegetation potential will be quite good over most of the disturbed areas due to the north- ern exposures of the slopes. Through the use of native mat- erials, a greater degree of revegetation success will result, both aesthetically and environmentally. Aside from the obvious visual benefits, vegetated slopes represent stablized slopes • and provide an almost immediate vegetative cover to aid in erosion control. Special efforts will be taken to minimize the visual and environmental problems created by the construction of the ac- cess road which will serve Westbank Ranch P.U.D. During the • actual construction of the road, temporary measures will be taken to control erosion that results from the disturbed slopes. Disturbed areas will be revegetated in an effort to reduce the visual impact and increase the soil stability. The principal areas of concern in this revegetation plan • are minimizing erosion, stabilizing slopes to prevent slumping and maintaining the aesthetic quality of the existing landscape. It is the purpose of this plan to use the existing vegetation conditions and then suggest mitigating measures to be integrated into the development process to minimize the visual and envir- onmental impact of construction. Special attention is given • to methods that will control erosion on exposed slopes and decrease runoff from the site. FINISH GRADING • Prior to revegetation planting or topsoil placement, all cut or fill slopes will be contoured to approximate and blend with existing adjacent terrain. Various slope molding techni- ques will be used to enhance the aesthetic quality of the dis- turbed slope, while maximizing the revegetation potential. All cut and fill slopes will be rounded at the head, with fill slopes • also being rounded at the toe to blend with the existing terrain. Additionally, where soils and steepness of slope permit, terraces will be constructed to aid the growth of new transplants on the slope. All topsoil, including existing vegetation, from excava- tion areas will be stockpiled with adequate precaution taken for erosion control. The incorporation of plant material into the topsoil will aid in erosion control and once the topsoil is respread, perhaps, the plant material will renew its growth. All available topsoil will be respread on disturbed areas to insure seed germination and serve as a mulch layer. Where soil texture is desirable for plant growth as determined by the Land- scape Architect, topsoil may not be respread if supplies are limited. Mulch and fertilizer will be applied to the subsoil layer to increase its revegetation potential. • • SEEDBED PREPARATION Seedbed preparation involves several growth promoting factors which are necessary to establish an effective grass stand. Cut slopes of exposed subsoil should be scarified to break up the • earth's surface. Additionally, the subsoil will be conditioned with mulch and fertilizer to improve the revegetation potential. By conditioning the subsoil with mulch, the water retention capacities of the soil will be increased. The addition of fer- tilizer will augment the fertility of the exposed subsoil. • SEEDING TECHNIQUES Several approaches to seeding are available. However, it is recommended for the proposed site that the most feasible approach to achieve successful revegetation would be a combin- • ation of hydroseeding and drilling. Drilling will be used on slopes of 3:1 or less with the remaining area to be hydroseeded. Hydroseeding will be done in two operations. The seed will be applied in a water and light mulch slurry after which mulch will be applied to cover the seed. This two step approach eliminates • the disadvantage that hydroseeding has traditionally had in non -irrigated sites. In this method, the seed is covered instead of suspended in the mulch. Drying does not tend to lift the seed away from the soil. The seed mixture specified below will be applied at a rate • of 30 lbs. per acre to all areas of disturbance. Unless other- wise approved, planting of the approved seed mixture will occur in late fall, preferrably just prior to snowfall. Seed Variety Lbs/Acre • Fairway Crested Wheatgrass 6.0 Intermediate Wheatgrass 6.0 Kentucky Bluegrass 3.0 Meadow Brome 6.0 Pubescent Wheatgrass 6.0 Timothy 3.0 • • • • 30 lbs/acre SEEDLING TRANSPLANTS To assure diversity and microclimate for seed establishment and assure survival, it is recommended that container grown seed- lings (young plants which are grown from seed) be planted on all disturbed slopes in addition to planting. The initial size of the plant will do more to create a microclimate and increase soil stability due to its developed root system than the same material planted as a seed. Seedling transplants provide a more success- ful way of introducing native vegetation into the landscape than from seeds. In addition, seedlings have been selected due to their superior survival capabilities in native planting situ- • 411 • ations as well as their cost efficiency which allows for more extensive plantings. The seedling mixture will vary with respect to existing materials found on the site. Seedling transplants will com- • plement the sagebrush, shrub landscape found on the bench, while Rocky Mountain Juniper and Pinyon Pine will dominate the planting in the drainage gulches. Seedlings should be planted in early spring or late fall, along with, but preferably prior to seeding operations. It is • recommended that 1,000 seedlings per acre be planted in des- ignated areas. • • • AFTER SEEDLING TRANSPLANTS The following plant materials will be used in varying quan- tities based on the existing materials found on the site. Rocky Mt. Juniper (Juniperus scopulorum) Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus) Silver Sage (Artemisia cana) • MULCHING Mulching will aid the revegetation process by modifying soil temperature and conserving, moisture. On slopes less than 2:1, hay or common straw will be applied at a rate of 12 tons • per acre. Mulch will be crimped into the surface of the soil with a disc or protected against wind displacement by Terra Tack II, a commercial tackifier. On slopes greater than 2:1 or in excess of 50', hydromulching will be used at a rate of 1500 lbs. per acre. On areas susceptible to excessive water erosion, such as natural drainage onto exposed slopes, jute mesh erosion blan- ket will be used. • • FERTILIZER Fertilizer will be used to supplement the inherent nutrient level of the topsoil. The amount and type of mixture needed will be determined by a future soils test of the on-site topsoil. As a general reference, a 20-10-10 ratio fertilizer will be applied at the rate of 200 lbs. per acre following the germination of the seed. BAS►G CoNSTKucTtoH • 5 {ore Vou. ril crcai.s. rrbrG ra4u.koi�lo4x Cvr��iuxafivt • P s Y id rcv 4\6 fK ibcs ca °�e file-61r 5Wre. F�OttNblNCa • • Y6416ore, a Cat, and �► 'SS cX 4 a mart. 11 6.01 a.hd va1l.t,9 _ c�xJ�9►�xa�-►an • Fick chat increasc, r d at►aye r.k 1ieki 61.0ra vAtgtAticepra • 'tElztzPGNGi • 410 410 ESTIMATED COST IN 1979 DOLLARS • • SEEDING Alternative I: Hydro -seeding Alternative II: Drill seeding MULCHING Alternative I: Hydro -mulching Alternative II: Straw Mulch with Terra Tack II $ 350/A 250/A 575/A 685/A SEEDLING TRANSPLANTS 1000/A @ $1.50 1,500/A • FERTILIZER 50/A • • • • • • • P.O. ^n 13.1 fiC21 67G2222 Ccio.G,�:)2 PRELIMINARY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION: WESTBANK RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FILING NO. 4 A parcel of land situated in Lots 14,15,24 and 25 of Section 1, and Lots 10, 11,12,13,14,15,18,19,20,21 and 22 of Section 2, all in Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, lying Westerly of County Road No. 109, Southerly of Westband Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 2 and No. 3 as filed in the Garfield County, Colorado records, Northerly of a Mesa Ridge, and Easterly of the North-South Centerline of said Section 2. April 13, 1981 Job No. 1080610 126 35 0 1 -o rIN O -33 v wEsr dq,vk 35- 35- ,7R E.1101 iN4izy- / F/L/4/6 N. 4 26 26 25 35 36 36 �WESTBANK GOLF COURSE T.6 S. 36 —2 of \R 2 12 VICINITY MAP ■ 15000 10000 5000 0 5000 10000 15000 SCALE IN FEET N 12 March 10, 1981 County Commissioners P.O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Gentlemen, • As President of the Westbank Homeowners Association, the Board has directed me to make a request of the Garfield County Commissioners. Before giving final approval for Westbank filing no. 4 and Don Ice's Development, the Westbank Homeowners Association Board would ask that you give further consideration to the Hardwick Bridge, the approaches to the bridge, and the access to Highway 82 as it relates to the Hardwick Bridge. Our concern regards the volume of traffic the bridge will have to handle ultimately, as well as the antiquated condition of the bridge and the possible safety hazard the condition of the bridge poses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, _J / Steve Connolly y' President of the Westbank Homeowners Association CENTENNI T ENGINEERING, INC. Mailing Address: rawer 1307, Arvada, Colo. 80001 Office Location: 15000 W. 64th Ave., Arvada, Colo. 80001 JOB NO. 903 CLIENT ,U e4/ea el 1/.f/27%.,� / 7 JOB TITLE/SUB—TITLE ` SUBJECTIDC�c� • PAGE / OF 2 / 8(Fir7-34/U r/L//' / i /}//'✓.lG DATE CK'D BY #7,/ V �! / t —nl a 'LC = g .I =)l J�9_ /16J J Z.� X - 1 f S go=7 /o0 .�6Z 'o oo/ £ ' o / 86 •D 9 6� `Y66-0= 0008Z ` 2 ‘.ox o=b -5.' _% 0 fr •6 0Of -EQ=J/rYr-6 09 xo p - off _4 re4/ • :,,avay • • (,(7.A/C,t 74- 411/4 2 4 = 2z 9 7e - i� o , / r 4/ 374-,,� 13 %, v =3. l �G O r 3.0 x . c olii� - J` . L•:: 570 5 - 1. Ol U = 3. 0 a 9.X60 ic= 1.9 -t- 2.7 = 7. i Z"- ¢ 7 �' .-�.ta� • �s c ,i 741-4 /C = 2. 9 - - . /9, 3Z& 5n.71,.. 000 fj ' %OW'P d,vP� 58,900.= /. 2/. ¢ .S Ite . 9 . I 0.3 0.25 I.3.5 -4-c 59% 0-g O OS 27, 10 7(. I00% 0.33 Q= 22. B X i.7 /X ' 33 x/.25 aria,_ 11.2 Cies 0. 8% --,> 36 ' i_ 11) Ma= 3.3 % /4 #3 = z , f ',/f/c;F .Qa1v /& d 'f0! /- 300, /= 39,�r) = /30, 00 = 2.9,77/n /7/7p Z= ' f' - 2% =/3#-).2 .n �G=2.91-i.3=4.2mir1 1--,376,./i9e4es/hocir v r' 0 -- 21 %o i 98 79 2.5O c. /00 = 2- S A ricx 0.13 A/ 2C 09 0.3 cAir /00 = 2.z O. 2f o. ¢3 v.- 7 . C q./.217--1 F' e ,4/tt/fifli = ./. or �7 ,� 0k'Si,' f* ; �...� / 4-=2.0 1_,(1 o'tJ' : L = 35O, /-/ .7: 32; s = 9/) or p/7 t 7107 5 n?/ r� . G p' -t, ; ,Q % = 0.9 05e- 2-0 2,0X 7-2D% a. 3 Z3% 09 (O°o .S�sx 0,14x/ 2S- 6 2 •t,e-x,91 9, Boo 71 /, 000 /pe 2, ¢DO 20� 20 = 0 itG 023 02/ C'=0- t z 0 ` /5 top,'€(/_/ 4c .rrt /a-r'zc *Az � N 0 i .* oho �Vs yv I I 1i It, • • o �' 7 0� ..: L = 620, ry= // y � s'/9 a v = 2.0 400 3 � C7Z 0x60 = 3. Eel 9. / t 3 3 = /2.i 19-7 A Z- T . 0 a/t.lAt.7 it/C 0°0 val, ¢, 200 (-c.�lXi✓ /o, 780 28/990 virthl 0.67 533 Pro 0 O. 3 O-67 /i% o . 9 . /0 �•o r00% G = 9. 37 C97 f C9� a• . , 0.37 4o•p...a.3 �G•o /3Z a.ac S770 0.26 /00 0 el, 0.3/ Q- o, x 1.0 n o . 3/ X / 2,r 7/ 3 //:7,c, G� 2.s a 300 �.9, )'j= s7 rxtafbt. ..rte 2.7 i� 41C%kt ( U 7 - 7. 3 7lie. 1. o5' two 2 ex P7 ) 1 :5 •603 y (17 /70 4r /�/nf A.1/G p,?z /3io 38 X71 73o too 233151-7:0) V=2•e 0.9 0.12 0-3 o Z,6 G=036 r 7. 3 x ‘5.-65-4 0.3e X/. 2 cforco~ /i• ‘ ,57 07; --->.- / 6 '; 6= ¢. of 'au _ �O ' 0 i7 I/ � o . Ha -e- 22,000 7 fr /1`, Obi ¢, 200 0-7€1' LOT /7 l3 f0 2 Sx(o Z` io f- c8 • /0 =7.3t 576=/2•?�C • *3g , _ /Zoji 9 7-28Z y = 2.0 2. 17 ¢OS f- 2.87= �. frnrl -. . 7. 30-..• p. 38 57 3 0. 22 37 6 0.30 137 & ./3 /2 ?,4C.. nn C = O. 3r L/r• /2.9 x ¢.8 x 0 3S-xi.2S_=27./ 9PC 000 ..200C /. 67 co / 27./ 2 /3'r . /0/Z %MA9,-te. , / 7 f- 50 �.?� l " •^.�aXi • 2.0 457-oc) CA /or 7f- (79- x'87/ c. Ze: te to _ - 012 2.2x. cad 3.5 = e 4u709 • f t 4/lf = /2.97fC 10-C -t-3.?t5 6 /2if t1 /7 o �1r L =600,;`_ X26, �� -2// 11 =z 2 6 3C9 o 3/ 3.9 9z P )57° MoD% C. 3.97C . • a i2 9 /9 0 -5:9 6i 68 7tc /c0 7 0 oa0 00 9, 800 /3/ foo 6.3 0 .3 0.35 35 p. 3/ o �l o. 28 007 = 0.3.5-- a 35 E ,Q=66.7 n 3.5 x D 33)(/ 2 _ f9, 2 Ot /o0 e‘?-(91-4! +i lotto f X - . rr e u 0/91 99.2 4 • o 21,6' v? fd ( 4 ?-4 3 o (0 S. s N(t) O o2 0. 07 0. 2/ 0.03 G=0.33 ••.7ze/y-7z z, �-- 7- 5-4c. f 2 V _ if 3• S >c . CcaG'"' 4471/4 = 0. 9 6-4-,.4 -(26 r 2, coo i t// x 3, oov) = z9 000 o�i�.✓ _ „ cep X /¢ = 2/, 000 /. G- 0.9 7/ .oS3 27 /7 -SC, /00% C-0• 3 / 6% y=3.3 . tc = _ 33X� ( 0 G8.7 - - 0,6/ 2 S 0.02 2. 0 0.02 22 el 0.20 /7 S 0. /S //3 . Sztc . X00/ - 0-33 O¢3 O.ff 0- Y3 0. 35' 0.20 a 0/ 0 0/ o.07 0.0 S ,-0/c=0.3t = e ,e/fik 124474,1) = .2a,0 7` /. ? = 2/.0 _ .= 3•/7 x0 -.3f x3./7x/2S =/52.9 6 49 "%; `t /k/ / aa', /523 • • ,f7 Ate, ,x,i44 • • 37o, # ; s= /7 8X) �vNc,c, . — 700 1) 141 = 8o ' s = /i . = 56' S= /Z.9 C z x co 1.6X 6o 51i x 6o keri'-'',--t!",xt, ‘-ef/5- = 75 t /2.5 oC‹-4/ v=20 V ' /. 6 ,.¢ 3 . / f 7 3 '' 2 / _ , Stn / /2 - 20. 0r77/ 7 • • et? �ver7 6' _ //3.S t' /3.6 /27/0 C O'Gt.' i� ` =(0.00o,' S ` ¢ ofd - 3 3> le-c-c$T-4 Go /y 3-3x0 3,03 tG = 2/. 0 r- 3.0 = z¢ o 1_ 2.91 • C = S a 3aoo s /sap , -Gv //3 s - - - • 0342 3 • 0 33 /, /So x m _ /6,.00 4--r .47 /27./ G= 0.31 3_OG t?Yeo 39 /c7t, =0•Bi'c. e.g. 0.9 60 . o s' f2 0.3 90 0.28 /3.(, /o64 c_o33 •12_ /27./0 x 2 x o.3f x /.25-= = /58 • 8 c . /°f/th6L e /2 iv s/" ke- �..J2d'/ $ki/'7y? X gL9f 2/6// -?/' /. v 4 ' oGt Myer To< (i---74-. x7-00 -to q. /Y too ) e-Letii 1/C---7/-).--- 7LAe- • • Lei /4', Q` 27 9 2, 2o�i Lor = 99 eA => 12 # r.t1 2X0'1-1'17 -rfifr -1;1, .7/J 4t7- 3/ fX co st,t Ai 2(4 30Ptco La/, /¢, /3, Q = /C3 eIz > .r6V/4o7oe- D'-ft. 2 a 3 ", z' °TS /2 , //) ''y'/.C�,c, it • • 6,17p-<,?_. I' 9 0,Paifriar Z = ere, 11/ = ;3t, ?"? -7= 2. 2.6x6o - CI 3 Q= s 8 x 5--./ x O 3 x (5),, cx::: 2cit (.25 c /00 fre 0 At, - (< 14,-27f= 2 3 -e. Ad Z Coo: 71/ 3?B)/ = 6 6 = 3 600 / CO) � 2�x6v///sir C 3-/ 7`' // / = !4.2 yr in = O.3 07.3 x 3.8Sx 0.3 xt2Sqc foIod = 39.¢CFS f 2 7 00 7 oer O%ll = 2 2 x 5 = 2'S CENTENNIA ENGINEERING, INC. Mailing Address:W. Drawer l i07, Arvada, Colo. 80001 Office Location: 15000 W. 64th Ave., Arvada, Colo. 80001 JOB NO. CLIENT JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE SUBJECT 0 PAGE ,/(O OF DATE ( , 7t/p/ 7C2iS BY CK'D BY T ( s) 64 �r = I�7 x aq- co/a = 3a1o413yc1cA- _a�ce-� re J6'fr 4/ 9reij ,fr q,4,4 ore a • 2 .94 '-e 7 97 � � 2 2.5' O/e/fh ire o We a/ = �. 94, /4-c, x ¢ o%r�r = 7.38 0, cre - 0,I 0, I JOB NO . 8o4) CENTENNI. ENGINEERING, Inc. 11405 WEST 48TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 80033 CLIENT l` Al JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE • PAGE /7 OF DATE ks/ /o f SUBJECT . ."L` rk-cA-10A UGI Vec BY QUI-4[Dv. 6Cp` , 5-14•1.) /00.1N /5ik 3 3o44„‘1) 0118 012$ O 15 0149 012. 0 i 4-o 0,50 01) D 010 01410 0159 0,81 D13(o b,s5 bC7D 019) 0t4?„ O,t4,5 O,8Z /, Ic 0147 01?3 Ir? -9 =N,.aeV•8--Uv�o�o... 64,r- 1Z4 -it D,89 /, 04 - /,DS 1118 /138 /122 1138 /,S-13 /i4.3 1,59 / 1g8 11 (03 117 7 2 1 o b /, B .Z 1197 21 z8 E}AIFJ /00.10 /5MMtJ 3uN.11.1 /{ 644t �41 o, LZ. 6b D 149 03 ais5B 1123 o,( 114 (Ob. /►b3 D,Ba 0,38 041 014$ 0,s¢ 0 431 4t cD /Z' a4 --4t 0,09 D,DE 0112 0,O' ()III 0,07 011' 0,0i 0,0 0119 0 1 JOB NO. CENTENNIA ENGINEERING, INC. Mailing Address: rawer 1107, Arvada, Colo. 80001 Office Location: 15 1 W. Goth Ave., Arvada, Colo. 80001 CLIENT JOB TITLE/SUB-TITLE w e.5 a, v. SUBJECT Z. ►lZ� " S f �u.r&* on-�i eInc BY • PAGE OF DATE CK'D BY Talcc r �' row. e urvc5 (OI3/19. e_a_krtotALle.leoforao WoAA A-c,c4s 2� P rcpars� 0 3-2 then computed by velocity. WATERCOURSE SLOP! IN PERCENT SO 30 20 10 S 3 2 .s .1 .2 dividing .3 .5 the ..,,� . .y -,�,,ctsdr total 1 overland 2 flow 3 length by the 5 10 average 20 .2 .3 .5 1 2 3 VELOCITY IN FEET PEA SECOND 5 10 Figure 3-1.- Aberage velocities for estimating travel time for overland flow. 20 50 30 20 10 5 3 2 2 .5 Storm sewer or road gutter flow Travel time through the storm sewer or road gutter system to the main open channel is the sum of travel times in each individual component of the system between the uppermost inlet and the outlet. In most cases average velocities can be used without a significant loss of accuracy. During major storm events, the sewer system may be fully taxed and ad- ditional overland flow may occur, generally at a significantly lower velocity than the flow in the storm sewers. By using average conduit sizes and an average slope (excluding any vertical drops in the system), the average velocity can be estimated using Manningls formula. Since the hydraulic radius of a pipe flowing half full is the same as when flowing full, the respective velocities are equal. Travel time may .L� t 4 AIMMI aVAlWAI. idil,A.,,,F _____ : I ,..,7 � tt_ - - J �e' , - -4$ _ - .' . . I a •,:-. _-� J W i_____. a - (f Q yy`/ i_--.-,-1.4 r _ , ,� , • } ir . 11 .2 .3 .5 1 2 3 VELOCITY IN FEET PEA SECOND 5 10 Figure 3-1.- Aberage velocities for estimating travel time for overland flow. 20 50 30 20 10 5 3 2 2 .5 Storm sewer or road gutter flow Travel time through the storm sewer or road gutter system to the main open channel is the sum of travel times in each individual component of the system between the uppermost inlet and the outlet. In most cases average velocities can be used without a significant loss of accuracy. During major storm events, the sewer system may be fully taxed and ad- ditional overland flow may occur, generally at a significantly lower velocity than the flow in the storm sewers. By using average conduit sizes and an average slope (excluding any vertical drops in the system), the average velocity can be estimated using Manningls formula. Since the hydraulic radius of a pipe flowing half full is the same as when flowing full, the respective velocities are equal. Travel time may .L� t rge— i .1 .09 .08 .07 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .009 .008 .007 .006 .005 004 .003 mamajimrswariwinfirayarrarr IMIv_7,:_aiIII/I//awI' M MINEW LI/ /MAIN 8" Diam. 12 15 1 24 12' 17' MINIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIMOMIwwrr--w�i�arr:w.!IIIMrIMn>•—ter —������I ���� MIIMriii��W�r�i I�Mrlr�l r ,�jW a'M WMNiiiiiININVAINIIIIIIIA —IM-----IIII/I///////MIW—/—I "'si#—I/—IIIIMMOii Ith M1 ."AI. ," hilIAIWAIA 001 Ai I/ I VA ri IF f , A M I I/ 77 1000 2000 5000 10,000 20,000 .002 41 1.0 Slope—in Feet per Foot 08 .07 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .009 .008 .007 .006 .005 004 .003 .002 .001 2 0 3.0 4 0 5. 6. 8. 10. 20 30 40 50 60 Discha 80 10 rge—i Fig. 21.. Energy Head Loss Based on Manning's Formula Pipe Flowing Full n = .024 200 300 n Cubic Feet per Sec 500 and MAIM' i_IMIL'iiIilh///V -M 8" Diam.'� AFAININIAIMAIMAI / AWN 10 12 15 18 24 •i * I V&J' 9 10' 12' 17' si r�,�s�w�c►t'i'�w�rr�w iii iiiiiiiii%� ---/I'A�-A Wif //////// M— A El aITAWa -- 1 INN/ WA 7 FIIl III I VA V 717111*711 1000 2000 5000 10,000 20,000 1.0 2.0 3.0 4 0 5. 6. 8..10. 20 30 40 50 60 80 Discha Fig. 22. Energy Head Loss Based on Manning's Formula n=.027 Pipe Flowing Full 100 200 300 n Cubic Feet per Se 34 500 and 180 166 156 - 144 - 132 - 120 ,g - 108 - 96 •4-- v A 10,000 8,000 LOSS COEFFICIENT K6 FOR VARIOUS ENTRANCE TYPES 6,000 5,000 4,000HW ENTRANCE p SCALE I TYPE COEFFICIENT (1) 2,000 (2) (3) 1,000 600 Headwall, sq..dget or End Section conforming to fill dope Mitered to conform to dope Protecting Irom4111 0.5 0.7 0.9 To use scale (2) or (3) protect horizontally to scale (1), then - 200 CD., Ouch*, ch*, et na - 400 n)au,at.d. O_ t v • 'S 0 0 N 0 54 0 - 42 EE 36 0 - 33 30 27 24 300 200 - 100 - 80 - 60 - 50 - 40 - 30 54MPLE EXAMPLE Dia m. (D) - 48 In. - 44 0-70 cfs - 20 Scale 11W-17" ST HW (1) 1.0 4.0(1. - 10 12) 1.0 4.0 6 13) 1,1 4.4 21 18 15 12 (1) -6. (2) (3) - 3. iT'6 1.0 -1.0 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE CULVERTS WITH INLET CONTROL Fig, 15. inlet Control Nomograph for corrugated steel pipe culverts. •• 6 U rn 0 O 2000 _1000 800 -600 - 500 - 400 -300 -200 100 - 80 MW 1 M SUOM5s0EO OUTLET CULVER- T FL0WIMO FULL MW. M4 5.-1.11. re, ppm crown net su.me1.14, oemdul. MW by method. deee,IE.d In the deel.n premien -72 -66 -60 -64 d 48 c -42 - 60 c - 50 - 40 `m E .15cls0 - 20 -10 -6 -6 5 4 -3 Head IHI In Feet -36 -33 -30 -21 -16 15 I2 Dlam.- 24 In. 0-25 cls L- 250 H. L' -250x0.44-110 H. Ke -0.25 Find H - 6.0 H. a- 2 Pig. 16. Outlet Control Nomograph merged outlet and flowing full. -2 -3 - 4 -5 -6 -10 20 HEAD FOR STANDARD CORRUGATED S STEEL PIPE CULVERTS FLOWING FULL—OUTLET CONTROL n=0.024 for corrugated steel pipe culverts with sub - '`'LENGTH ADJUSTMENT FOR IMPROVED HYDRAULICS Pipe Diameter in Inches Roughness Factor nr for Helical Corr. * Length Adjustment Factor \fl / 2 12 24 36 48 .011 .016 .019 .020 .21 .44 .61 .70 •Other values of roughness, n, are applicable to paved pipe, lined pipe and pipe with 3 x 1 In. corrugations. See page 31. To use the above chart for these types of pipe and pipe -arches, use "adjusted length factors" computed per the equation. page 29. 5062 113 Road WRJ-4-Rev. 76 C '.ORADO DIVISION OF WATER RES(' -'4CES 1 ' 818 -•niaI Bldg., 131E Sherman St., Denver, Coli_ 11 80203 c` PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ��* ```V Application must '1'�� be complete where (x ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER C/ CFp Q applicable. Type or (x ) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL �t' v c0'�RG print in BLACK FOR: (x ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP v `, hPSER RENG,ttEER INK. No overstrikes mac; �. SAOt"coLp. or erasures unless ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO 0 initialed. ( ) OTHER � WATER COURT CASE NO (1) APPLICANT - mailing address NAME Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. c/o James arson orney at Law STREET P• 0. Box 4/6 CITY Glenwood Springs, CC (State TELEPHONE NO. 303-945-865 81601 (1(p) (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL County Garfield SE ''/ of the SW 1/4 Section 35 Twp. 6 S Rng 89 IN,Si W 6th E,WI (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 200 Average ann to be appro Number of ual amount of ground watr ariated (acre-feet): P.M. r 300 acres to be irrigated: Proposed to Aquifer gro sands a non e tal depth (feet): 100 and water is to be obtained nd gravels from: Owner's well designation Westbank Ranch-No.1 well GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: • )NOUS X) DOME 1 LIVES X) COMM EHOLD USE ONLY - no irr STIC (1) TOCK (2) ERCIAL (4) gation (0) ( ) INDUST ( ) IRRIGA ( ) MUNICI 1 OTHER (9) DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (1 1) , Ltd. E7o . 4 RIAL (5) TION (6) PAL (8) (4) DRILLER - Name Mountain Drilling Co. Street City Carbondale, CO. (,tate) 81623 Telephone No 945-5148 Lic. No 697 (lip) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Receipt No :/ S `—" // Basin Dist. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested vtia,er right or preclude another owner of a vested waster right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 1) A DECREE FOR THIS APPROPRIATION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 5, STATE OF COLORADO'_ PRIQZ TO THE USE OF THIS WELL. 2) IF AQUIFER TESTS ARE CONDUCTKI) ON TK S TEST DATA AND RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTER TO T' DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES. 3) THE PUMPING RATE OF THIS WELL 'SHALL • BE LIMITE TO 200 GALLONS PER MINUTE OR THE.ACTUAL YIELD OF THE AQUIFER, WHICHEVER IS TES. Ali AQUIFER TEST OF SUFFIC TENT TFNGTH, AT LEAST 48 HOURS; SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITH THE PERMANENT PUMP EQUIPMENT INSTALLED. TEST DATA AND RE SULTS SHAL -BE-SUBMITTED-TO-TIE DIVISION OF WATER RE SOUR :ES, 4) TOTALIZING FLOW METER MUST RE fl' STATJFD 0:1 THE WELL DISCHARGE WHEN THE WATER IS PUT TO ' RT'NEF IC IAL USE. DIVERSION RECORDS SHALL "RT, SUB- MITTED, UPON REQUEST, TO THE DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES . ,, APPLICATION APPROVED —PERMIT NUMBER 2� 0(�..10 - DATE ISSUED DEC 13 1977 EXPIRATION DATE DEC 131978 • • 11Yle (STATE NGL? ER) BY I.D. COUNTY .23 ( tank and leac rily domestic, d, including wells. Gi (purpose) 1, 2 and 3 THE INFORMAT • (5)l -HE LOCATION OF THE PI which the water will be used musl . Use -the CENTER SECTION (1 sec OSED WELL and the arca on indicated on the diagram below. ion, 640 acres) for the well location. + - -{- - -1- — -f– - 4 — -i_- -- --}- -- _4_ 1 I4 1 MILE, 5 FEET 1 -I- 4- 4- + + h --1 NORTH -SEC ON LINE 1 — T — 1 — 1 -�-- — i rI 231 I x M CV I I SOUTH SEION LINE D m () 1 0 z r— Z rn 4 4: 4: — + — } — - — — -+- — -+- — The scale of the diagra is 2 inches = 1 mile Each small square rresents 40 acres. WATER EOUIV LENTS TABLE 1 An acre-foot covers 1 acre of land 1 oot deep 1 cubic foot per second (cfs) ... 4 gallons per minu A family of 5 will require approxi ely 1 acre-foot o 1 acre-foot ... 43,560 cubic feet 325,900 gallons. 1,000 gpm pumped continuously for one day produce (6) THELL MUST BE L('1:ATED BELOW by distances from section lines: 1237 Ill ft. from South sec. line (north or south) East 2961 ft. from sec line (east or west) LOT N/A BLOCK N/A FILING u N/A SUBDIVISION N/A— — — (7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED Owner Applicant No. of acres 45 (greenbelt) Wil; this be the only well on this tract? No Rounded F igures) e (gpm) water per year. 4.42 acre-feet. (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing _10 __in. from 0 ft to 70 ft in from ft to ft -r(.r.a, r- 3eff casing --- 10in. from 70 ft to 100 ft (9) infrom ft to ft. FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS give distance and direction from old well and plans for plugging it: N /A (10)' LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: OwnerR9: Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. No. of acres: 550 acres Legal description: See Exhibit B attached (11) DETAILED DESCRIPTION ;of the use of ground water: Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of disposal sysvmsposaotesystem: individual septi for all beneficial purposes, prima homesites. (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this earn Type or right Used for Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Wells No. Robertson Ditch (see annexed Exhibit (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT D) TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. h field/dry well. Water will be used including servicing up to 200 ve Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Drisrription of land on which used (see annexed Exhibits A, C & E) ION SET FORTH HEREON WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1, LTD'. By.---Westbank Development Co., Inc. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(S) By: esi IS I�+ IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. STATE OF COLORADO Application IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1 ' LTD. IN THE ROARING FORK RIVER IN GARFIETT) COUNTY No. W-2516 5 1 L. L) Div it iot: ; „ . •- r6-• t, ' ? '•_ire ET4?s r OF RULING OF REFEREE The above entitled application was filed on December 17, 1974, and was referred to the undersigned as Water Referee for Water Divi- sion No. 5, State of Colorado, by the Water Judge of said Court on the 3rd day of Janu y, 1975, and again, after stipulation, on August 7, 1975, in cordance with Article 92 of Chapter 37, Colorado Revised Statutes 19 , known as The Water Rights Detenuination and Administration Act o 1969. And the undersigned Referee having made such investigations as are necessary to de cation and statenen advised with respec ermine whether or not the statements in the appli- of opposition are true and having become fully to the subject matter of the application and state- ment of opposition does hereby make the following determination and ruling as the Refer 1. The stat 2. The name 3. The nam No. 1, Ltd.; c/o Mi Springs, Colorado. 4. The sou 5. The hea. Westerly bank of t Corner of Section 2,788.14 feet. 6. The Rob vious Civil Action snCond of February 11, 1883; second of time by 1885; Priority No by virtue of Secon The applica in Priorities No. seven -ninths inter by this appli.catio e in this matter, to -wit: ments in the application are true. of the structure is Robertson Ditch. of the claimant and address is Westbank Ranch cer, Larson and I-Iartert; P.O. Box 850; Glenwood e of the water is the Roaring Fork River. ate of the Robertson Ditch is located on the Roaring Fork River at a point whence the S8uthcast , T. 7S. , R. 89W. of the 6th P.M. bears N. 27 56' W. ani rtson Ditch has been awarded the following in pre- Pri.ority No. 52 for 4.0 cuhic feet of ,rater Per 7i71:1— o: o - i_-ia 1 re1r.t .. -, b .c _ t Priority No. 112 for 3.5 cubic feet of water per virtue of First Enlargement relating back to April 1, 595 for 9.0 cubic feet of water per second of time 1 Enlargement relating back to April 2, 1950. .t is the o,..Tner of and undivided two-fifths interest 52 and No. 112; and is the owner of an undivided est in Priority No. 595. The total amount affected is 10.0 cubic feet of water per second of time. 7. On December 17, 1974, the applicant filed, in Water Court for Water Division No. 5, an application for change in water right in which it is requested that the applicant be permitted to change the method of use of the water owned by him in the Robertson Ditch, so that the applicant may divert, at times, all of the water from the main irrigation ditch to five storage ponds. At other times the ap- plicant will leave the water in the ditch for purposes of irrigation as has been done in the past. The water in the ponds is used for recreational, piscatorial and irrigation purposes for a golf course. Applicant will not enlarge the historic consumptive use of the water, nor will the change result in any diminution of return flow to the stream. No other appropriations will be damaged by the change. All construction encompassed by the requested change has been completed, and the system has been in full operation since August of 1972. Applicant intends no change in time, place, or type of use, nor in the means or point of diversion of the water owned by applicant. Rather, applicant seeks a change from immediate, direct application of the adjudicated, absolute water rights, to storage and subsequent application of the water. 8. On February 27, 1975, the Ranch at Roaring Fork Home- owners Association, Inc., filed a statement of opposition, and the Water Referee re-referred the application to the Water Judge for Water Division No. 5. 9. On August 7, 1975, the applicant and the objectors filed the following stipulation: A. Objector hereby withdraws its Statement of Opposition filed herein, on the condition that any decree entered in this matter per- mitting a change of water rights from direct application to storage and subsequent application, in the manner requested in the Application herein, contain the provisions set forth in this Stipulation. B. Applicant hereby agrees and covenants that the storage and subsequent application of water decreed to the Robertson Ditch, in the manner requested in the Application herein, shall be so limited as to result in no enlargement of historic consumptive use of the water rights for which the change is sought, as to result in no change in the time, place or type of use thereof historically made, and as to result in no diminution or other change in historic return flow patterns from the use of such water rights to the detriment of Objector. C. Applicant hereby agrees and covenants that in order to protect the interests of Objector it is necessary that the Division Engineer and his subordinate water officials administer the storage and subsequent application of water decreed to the Robertson Ditch in such a way as to enforce the provisions of this Stipulation as incor- porated into any decree entered herein. Applicant further agrees and covenants that in order to protect the interests of Objector it is necessary that, in the event that Objector believes that the requirements of any decree entered herein are not being fully satisfied, Objector may petition either the Division Engineer or the T.•'ater Judge of eater Division No. 5 for legal or equitable relief, as permitted by law. D. The rights and obligations described herein shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective successors and assgns. The Referee does therefore th, t the above entitled ap- plication should be granted and. that the change in method of use of the applicant's Robertson Ditch water as described in paragraph 7 above should be allowed; subject, however to the terms and conditions as set forth in the stipulation in paragraph 9 above. It is accordingly ORDH ED that this ruling shall be filed with 110 410 the \later Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing, subject to Judicial review pursuant to Section 37-92-304 C.R.S. 1973. It is further ORDERED that a copy of this ruling shall be filed with the appropriate Division Engineer and the State Engineer. Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, this 47 .6 day of CC 2-/P BY THE REFEREE: ?eater?/e' eree Water Division No. 5 State of Colorado No protest was filed in this matter, and accordingly the fore- going ruling is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgment and Decree of this court; provided however, that the approval of this change of water right shall be subject to reconsideration by the Water Judge on the question of injury to the vested rights of others during any hearing commencing in the two calendar years succeeding the year in which this decision is rendered. .7 prot `.'tet :'pis i ;if'.?. j,, 17-'q The foregoing ruling 'r and approved, and is ma -'r f!':9 Judgment and Decree of this court. Pated: Nater Judge Dated /.!.i ; / = C ,/ i. '� r Water Judge r quadruplicate • 1 WATER FORM B IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 5 STATE OF COLORADO :ase No. W- 3(�� IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1, LTD. IN GARFIELD COUNTY. 1.1eJ I -� APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHT (Underground or well) 1. Name of applicant: Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Address of applicant: P. 0. Box 987 Glenwood Springs, CO. Zip 81601 Telephone number of applicant: 945-6619 171 2. Name or number of well, if any: Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Well No. 3 3. Legal description of location of well: Said well is located in the SW GS E4, Section 35, T. 6 S., R. 89 W. of the 6th P.M. at distances of 1017 feet more or less, from the South section line and 1326 feet, more or less, from the East section line of said Section 35. Amended 4/8/72 • 1 4. This well is located in the watershed of the Roaring Fork GROUICUMIK River. 5. Depth of well: ninety two feet 6. A. Date of initiation of the appropriation: April 11, 1976 B. Date water first applied to beneficial use: December 1. 1976 C. How appropriation was initiated: drilling of well 7. Amount of water claimed in gallons per minute of time.: A. Portion absolute: 25 gpm B. Portion conditional: 15 gpm S. Use or proposed use of water: domestic and commercial 9. Number of well as registered in State Engineer's Office or, if a new well, attach copy of the permit or order of denial: Permit No. 021324-F (copy of permit attached) 10. In case of an irrigation priority, the number of acres being irrigated: 0 ; the number of acres historically irrigated: 0 ; and the number of acres proposed to be irrigated 0 11. Remarks: by the decree sought. Signat e of applicant or attorney for applicant Reg. No. 2603 719 Grand Avenue #5 P. 0. Box 476 Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 (303) 945-8659 Name, address and telephone number of attorney for applicant STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD John Huebinger, Jr. ss. being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that (s)he has read the foregoing application, knows the contents thereof, and that the same are true, and that he is President of Westbank Development Co., Incorporated, herein. general managing partner of Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd., Applicant /7_ =!_., X1 (j Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20th day of January , 19 78 Notary Public I -3- WRJ-5-7b Application must be complete where applicable. Type or print in BLACK INK. Nu overstrikes Ia erasures a iles% initialrtl. COLSADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOUIS 300 Columbine Bldg., 1845 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (x )A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER (X) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL FOR: () A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP (x) REPLACEMENT EOR NO 146787 {No, GW12344) ( ) OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO W _1064__(S�e_Exhibit A, RUINED Ai O Ir'76 WARM @ESGI1RCEi STATE UriGtAME txTlSl- attached) (1) APPLICANT - mailing address NAME W stbkN anRanch n _ 1 _ Ltd_ c/o Mincer, Larson and Hartert STREET P. O_Box 850 CITY Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (state) TELEPHONE NO. 303-9145-5448 (hip) (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL County Garfield SW ;5 of the SE Y.,, Section 35 Twp. 6 S Rng. 89 W_ 6th P.M. IN.SI LW, (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 100 Average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated (acre-feet): 150 Number of acres to he irrigated: None Proposed total depth (feet): 100 (estimate) Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Sands and gravels Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Owner's well designation _ WelL_No. 3 GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY ntl Inlul;uuln (0) (X) DOMESTIC (1) ( ) INDUSTRIAL (5) LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (G) 1 x 1 COMME RCI/\L (•1) ( ) MUNICIPAL (131 I ) OTHLR (9) DETAII TI IL OSI ON RACK IN (11) 1011 01 LICE USE ONLY: 00 NOF WRITE IN TIIIS COI UMN (4) DRILLER Collins Drilling Co. ;rrcet Box 375 Carbondale CO Hall (Ihttlll• N„ 963-2812 11, Ni 81623 6311 Receipt No 767&31 Basin Dist. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the hermit does not assure the applicuant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 1) A DECREE FOR THIS APPROPRIATION MUST BE OBTAIN ED FROM THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIV— ISION NO, 5, STA'L'E OF COLORADO, PRIOR 7,"' THE USE OF THIS WELL. 2) IF AQUIFER TESTS ARE CONDUCTED ON THIS WELL, TEST DATA AND RESULTS SHALL BE SUBI'IITTED TO THE DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES. 3) THE PUMPING RATE OF THIS WELL SHALL BE LIMITED TO 100 GALLONS PER MINUTE OR THE ACTUAL YIELD OF THE AQUIFER, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AN AQUIFER TEST OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH, AT LEAST 48 HOURS, SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITH THE PERMANENT PUMP EQUIPMENT IN— STALLED. TEST DATA AND RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITT TO TND DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES. 4) TOTALIZING FLOW METER MUST BE INSTALLED ON T WELL DISCHARGE WHEN THE WATER IS PUT TO BENEFICIA USE. DIVERSION RECORDS SHALL BE SUBMITTED, UPON REQUEST, TO THE. DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES.,j)J APPLICATION APPROVED I't NIJNIBLIt 021324 r F DATE ISSUED AUG 05 1976 AUG 05.1977_._ I X.I'IRAIIUN DA IL ltY I11 .�Cl��dr ('. l A i t J(;I Ili) E 1 .1 1 1 11 I. 1 .—. - - --- -- . - ----- -- •t5) fN__E_ LOCATION OF THE PR' ')SED __WELL___and ii,,,nr:a (,r, •wluc.h :',n. Water will he n;erl rnu.l 1.rted on the diar1r•ui• below ▪ Ilse the CI NII II :it CI ION (1 t.eUn r•,r•�',, tet.) Int the well lot ,,lirill NOR1 H r -1- A -r -I` w 2 J 2 0 1- w ) I I 1 MILL, 5780 FELT -i I T 6 S R89 W of 6th P.M. NORTH SECTION LINE — —1— — — X I � I 1 I l SOUTH SECTION LINE —I- I • 3N11 NO1103S 1SV3 E- • The scale of the diagram is 2 inches = 1 mile Each small square reptesents 40 acres. •-1 4- 4. (6) T I IE 1' ' L MUST BE LOCATED BELOW by rlr , •lI 11;) •.r•r:ln,n lute.. 1017 11 Iran, South .e, Inn• (.,••,n1 ,,, . nal,) 1 326 It form East rr 0%.1•.1-,W1•,t) l -o1 N/A -._lit oCK N/A _FILING t N/A SIJI3DIVISION N/A sec. 1 n u, ' (7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED Owner: Applicant No. of acres Will (est.) greenbelt W ;I this he Yes the only well on this tract? (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 8 in. from in from Perforated casing 8 in. from in, from 0 ftto lQ ft ft to ft 70 ft to 100 tt ft to ft WATER EOUIVALFNTS TABLE (Rounded Figures) An acre-foot covers 1 acre of land 1 foot deep 1 cubic foot per second Ids) ... 449 gallons per. minute (gpm) A family of 5 will•require approximately 1 acre•foot of water per year. 1 acre-foot ... 43,560 cubic feet ... 325,900 gallons. 1,000 gpm pumped continuously for one day produces 4.42 acre-feet (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS givedistance and direction from old well and plans for plugging it 2000 feet Northeast of Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Well No. 2 le.stima.tel— (10) LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: Owner(s): WPStbank_Ranrh Nn. 1,_Ltcl_anrf s.uccessnrs Legal description: _SPe_Fvhtblt-8-, .attached No. of acres: 55f1 ar .e (11) DETAILED DESCRIPTION of the use of ground water: disposal system to be used. Household use and domestic•wells must indicate type of Disposal system: individual septic tank - leach field. Water will replace water from WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1, LTD., WELL NO. 2, which will be plugged and abandoned, and water will be used for all beneficial purposes including servicing up to 200 homesites allowed for the capped ...44111421.14-11- (12) .4TVT4T (12) Oft1ER WATER RIGHTS used an this land, including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right Used for (purpose) Description 01 kind on which used Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Well No. 1 (:ee Exhibit C, attached) Robertson Ditch (see,Exhibit D, attached) (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1, LTD. By: Westbank Development C,- . , Inc. , a Colorado corporation SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT(SI By: Use additional sheets of paper if more space is rerluue(1 President 444,, .44444.44*44.44 4.44,4444,4444, F .I'I E. D I:;.l:-.:! r.. Ir.( . �L,1 1; . . ;..1. c•, 1 E (31. i 1 "i i ._ 12 ! !- .Y,. ,1ri,•! 1•... .. I)! •.';!.:ull S IN Tiir; 7;:;ii2lCr. COURT IN ANi) 102 ,I A Er; DIV1S7ON NO. 5 STATi•; OF COLORADO �{ U:_:71 1. f?Ir !. • 1064 Westbr,ir. Ranch•No. 1, Ltd:, ' f Well No. 2 IN Hi; MATl^r.R OF THE ) • APPLICATION FOR ) . WATa RIGHTS OF Westbank ) Ranch Na.1 l.tci .a Colol-ado ) RULING OF TIE R EK7, Limited Partnership, ) • IN T irE Colorado -RIVER OI ITS TRIIIIUT/. IFS ) ) . .RIBUTARY INVOLVED: ) • Roaring Fork River ) IN Garfield COUNTY ) And the Referee having made the investigations required • by Article 21 of Chapter 148, C.:.S. 1963, as amended does hereby nae the following ruling, to wit: Absolute DZ:,R Z ?OR UNDER GROUND WATZR RIGHTS This application was referred to the Water Referee of Water Division No. 5 on the 12th day of Tu 1 v , 1977 • Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. P. 0: Box 987 Glenwood Springs, •Colorado 81601 1. Name of Applicant Address 2. The name of the structure' io Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd., Well No. 2 3. Tho Legal description of tho structure is Said well is located in Lot •• No.. 15, Westbank Raney Planned Development Subdivision, Filing No. 1, accord- . • ing to the plat thereof filed as Document No.248729 of the records inthe office of the Garfield County, Colorado Clerk and Recorder, at a point whence the• Southeast •. Corner of Section 35, Township 6 S., R. 89 West of the Sixth P.M..bears S.81015'39' . E. 3298.51 feet, in Garfield County, Colorado . 4. The depth of -the well is 90 feet; static water level 40' feet, • 5. leo date of initiation of appropriation is • 6. The amount of water claimed is 15 g 1962. .• 7. The use of the water is ordinary household purposes,watering of domest animals and livestock,irrigation home gardens and lawns and other.beneficial 8. The State Engineer's number is • . • • Purposes. Permit No._ 46787 (No. GW12344) . /,Ch/ y 9. The Priority ylate is ✓ 3/J /�GY .{vim 10. The date of the application was • June 29,1972. It is the ruling of the Referee that the statements in the ,application are true and that the above described water right is approved and. jranted the indicated priority; subject, however, to all earlier priority rights of others. It is accordingly ordered that this ruling shell becowe effective upon filing with the Water Clerk, subject to Judicial review (AG provided by law. Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado this 0— day of October •197 2 '^ -'•t' ^t vn••; f i l r!r) ‘1) 't.�: � i;•_, � %r i. r';.►•. .:rt: r„tl••(.. •.,; :;rrr) 1': m 'rir• tho J.. of this Water Divin :.on. No. State of Colorado 5 !Exhibit A to Permit Application Form WARRANTY RANTY Dl ED BY AND II}'!.''►•TEEN THE TRUSTIES Or WFLA'I'ON COLT E,a1 ILLINOIS EDUCATION. C i'ORATIO , AND D • l`'I:ST 1 SA N :TJ CH N0 . 1, Lr.['1D . , 71 ...Xi ? D P A T:T EflSHIP 1 ots 11. ancl. 2J 1n .: t.. C ion 1 1'oo31s!lip 7 South, Ranr�c 89 ;:c.`.: t, 6th P. 1i., part of YrJLs 5, 13, 15 ;inti -21- in said ,Section 1, lying South and West o1 ,fo110':ins described line: Leginning at a point on the 1:orth line of s aicl 1./..)t 5 1thence the .:or the eSt corner of said Section 1 Dear: So1 ..n 8CP337 Lest 93.83 :i'ce,,, South 22°03' South 16°31' South 11 South 19°1 i 1' DATED and .' 1' thence :.hence thence a.ca- thence thence thence thence thence a.a_ Lots 1,2,3,4,5,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,19 and 23; all to Section 2, Township 7 Sour:: Range 89 West., 6th P.M. South 52°22' .SouthJ- i 5J South 4-4°29' East East East u� East East East East East 60.4 feet, 126.7 feet, 542.7 feet, j. ;Let, 233.0 feet, 706.0 feet, 582.6 406.0 feet to thc Eat line of said Lot 21-. That part, of Lot 3 of Section 36 and that part of Lots 11 and 26 of Section 35, 01 in To\Tnship 6 South, -Range 89 est, 6th P.L;. lying So: tti,:esterly of the following • described line: :Beginning at a point on the South line of said LOt 3 whence the Southwest corner ' of said Section 36 bears South Co°33' ITcs-t 93.88 feet, thence 1�:orth 22°03' West 312.7 fee:., -` thence North 46°471 I1est 5 feet, - t' 42°041 East 160.0 feet to the center of the Roaring; Pork River, ;,Hence North n 1 2 0, - thence North 51048' West 121:.1 feet a1on the center o1 the Roaring Fork :River., - thence North 450572 West 239.8 feet -along the center o2 the Roaring Fork River, thence North 62-°33 ;Test 507.8 feet along the centc of the Roaring Fork River, - thence North 84°52' West 169.6 feet along the center of the Roaringi'or� '- :River = r to the Westline of said lA t !O. Lots 12,13,11 ,15 and 27 in Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 I'Test, 6th p.u., and that part of Lots 7,8 Gnd 28 in Section 35, lying South of the Roaring Fora: - River. h? so, lots n nibered 8,18,21, and 22, all in Section 2, Township 7 South, Ranse _89 1 of the 6th P.M., containing 87.17 acres,r; bre or less.. EXCEPT that gook 305 at portion thereof conveyed. by instrument reconc'ed Lovc-ccr. 5, 1957 in page 201:. .And EXCEPT the following described parcels . PARCEL I. 1 A parcel of land situated in Lots 14, 15 and 17, Section 35, Township No. 6 South, Rang..! No. 89 West of thc 6th Principal '.ei idian, Garfield Co :I t'J Colorado, : nor e fully .described as follows: Beginning at a point \•;hence the Southeast Corner of said Section 35 bears S 84°27'41" E 3340.49 feet; thence N 22°09'56" !'1 274.34 feet; thence N 82°55'00" E 240.00 :feet; thence S 20°35'40" E 185.00 feet; thence S 69°24'20" W 82.00 feet; thence along thc Arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 328.4.4 feet a distance of 148.83 feet to the poi.nt of beginning, containing 1.159 acres, norc or less. PARCEL ft 2 A parcel of land situated in Lots 7 and 14, Section -35, Township No. 6 South, Range No. 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the Southeast Corner of said Section 35 bears S 80°10'58" E 2972.104 feet; thence N 07°13'48" W 251.73 feet; thence N 71°15'00" }i 142.00 feet; thcncc S 28°5$'00" I; 233.00 feet' thence along the Arc of a curve to tho right having a radius of 930.00 feet distance of 135.89 feet; thcncc S 69°24'20" W 98.27 feet - to the point of beginning, containing 1.041 acres ncrc; or lens. !Exhibit [3 to Permit Application Fort • • it4GI... .. . . • • :1:4: IN THE DI:;TitICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 5 'STATE OF COLORADO CASl P10. 41_ 1064 Westban}:cii,ro.vVr, Well No. 1 IN T}IE roVITER OF TIIE ) • APPLICATION FOR ) ' 4Ti;i2 RICH S O Westbank Ranch No. 1,IIrd. ,ti Cololc,do' ) Limits Partners >.p, I;; THE Colorado ) RIVER OR ITS TRI13UTARIr'S ) ) TRIBUTARY INVOLVED: Roaring ) • Fork River ) IN G ARFI E LD COUNTY ) RULING OF THE REFEREE E ABSOLUTE DFREE FOR UND R GROUND 'TATER RIGHTS And the Referee having made the investigations required by Article 21 of Chapter 148, C.R.S. 1963, as amended does hereby make the following ruling, to wit: This application was referred to the Water Referee of Water Division No. 5 on the 12th day of July , 1972 . 1. Name of Applicant Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Address P. 0. Box 987 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 2. The name of the structure is Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd., Well No. 1 3. The Legal description of tho structure is Said well is located in Lot No, 14,Westbank Ranch Planned Development Subdivision, Filing No. 1,accord- ing to the plat thereof filed as Document No.248729 of the records inthe office ofCCthe Garfield County, Co. Clerk and Recorder,at a point whence the Southeast S°T/8eio'f0Sq' .tion8 �:To. nshipi6 S., R. 89 W., of the sixth P.M. bears Garfield County, Colorado. 4. The depth of• the well is 90 feet, static water level 40 feet. • • • 5. The date of initiation of appropriation is 6. The amount of water claimed is 15 g .p.m. 1962 7. The use of the water is ordinary household purposes ,watering of domesti animals and livestock,irrigation home gardens and lawns and other beneficial 8. The State Engineer's number is purposes. Permit No. 46799 (No. GW 12345) . 9. The Priority date is l)C� , %/74 r 'i, / /62, ,T 0. The date of the application was June 29, 1972. It is the ruling of the Referee that the statements in the .application are true and. that the above described water right is approved and 1;1 -anted the indicated priority; r>ubject, however, to all earlier priority rights of others. It is accordingly ordered that this ruling shall become effective upon filing with the Water Clerk, subject to Judicial review as provided by law. /2/I Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado this /7 — day of October , 1972 4. • ri n filet) in thin I. -.•,, r,il l•,r. i • r.n,lf.'Ir-•r:1 .1 rl!,ri in ri`••rIt! tho I 1)u4t, • •) of this curt. : 11 J 1 J 11 11 a - o t.)Z m-1 n afl NKZ � coo LA c _, o , c 7,_,r 1; .c -I Iva! ' 31 .ii i. L • • c the land design partnership October 30, 1980 Mr. Ray Baldwin County Planner 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood. Springs, CO 81601 RE: Westbank Planned Unit Development Extension Dear Ray: I submit this letter as a representative of John Huebinger and his Westbank Ranch P.U.D. project. The project is rapidly approaching the December 12, 1980 deadline for the final plat on the first phase of the P.U.D. Mr. Huebinger has pursued the project actively and, in fact, has engineers presently on the site completing surveying requirements as necessary for the final plat application. In consideration, though, of the approaching winter and dif- ficulties in regard to the past and present economic climate for land development, I am requesting on Mr. Huebinger's be- half that the County grant a twelve month extension to the P.U.D. final plat submittal deadline. The consideration of this matter by you and the Board of County+Qommissioners at your earliest convenience would be appreciated. If you have any questions or desire any additional informa- tion, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, Ronald B. ton RBL/lp cc: John Huebinger Suite 208 Village Plaza Glenwood Springs Colorado 81601 945-2246 `lc NOv 319B0 h1 R.'n• . s • • WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Carl E. & Lillian Baker 0074 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Roland & Jean M. Barre 3792 - 117 Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Lyle W. & Patsy J. Beattie P.O. Box 8 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Lester F. & Wanda S. Bickel 0965 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Helen G. Bishop P.O. Box 1145 Carbondale, CO. Herman F. & Hilda W. Brueggeman 1123 Riverview Dr. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Alan J. & Cheri A. Cappo 0252 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. R obert F. & Joan L. Chaffin P.O. Box 698 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Steven E. & Rebecca A. Connolly 0041 Oak Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. George & Waudene Cowen 0644 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John R. & Elaine Crump 0368 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Joseph S. & Carol J. Dombrowski 3203-1/2 Cooper Ct. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Dennis W. & Terrie R. Drake 0377 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Cecil L. & Elizabeth B. Dunn 0836 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. James M. & Ann B. Eddins P.O. Box 1483 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Dennis Edson P.O. Box 779 Carbondale, CO. Charles W. & Mary E. Ensor 0088 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Parvin & Timothy B. Erlandsen 0794 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Gerald W. Fairbanks Const. 0507 Westbsnk Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Hazel Finley 0028 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Howard V. & Susan E. Frisch 0896 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Robert N. & Judith A. Fuller 0102 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Ronald J. & Mary L. Fuller P.O. Box 1102 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Delbert & Jean P.O. Box 938 Basalt, CO. Garner Jerry M. & Judith Gerbaz Box 1964 Aspen, CO. James T. & Roberta A. Gill 0345 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Noiman L. & Nancy L. Gould 0066 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Terry 0. & Stephanie Gunderson 10866 Berry Ave. Englewood, CO. WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Howard H. & Janice C. Hall 0283 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Gary L. & Linda J. Heisel P.O. Box 1324 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Elmer K. & Maxine Herklotz 51427 Hwy 6 & 24 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Stewart & Virginia Hineline 0122 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John C. Hochstedler P.O. Box 323 Basalt, CO. John Jr. P.O. Box Glenwood Ken F. & P.O. Box Glenwood & Delores Huebinger 987 Spgs, CO. Tina L. Hush 1412 Spgs, CO. Don Ice 1244 Road 106 Carbondale, CO. J & M Investments (no address) George E. Jaynes 775 - 36th St. Los Alamos, N.M. 87544 Allen G. & Valeria Johnson P.O. Box 417 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Richard D. & Anna L. Johnson 0224 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Duane L. 0049 Oak Glenwood & Elizabeth A. Keck Ln. Spgs, CO. Richard F. & Phyllis J. Kekar 12694 St. Hwy 82 Carbondale, CO. LaDonna Knudson 2407 Isabel St. Sante Fe, N.M. 87501 Dale A. & Nancy Laramie 0029 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. F. Dean & Charlene 0570 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. E. Lillie Richard L. & Shirlee Lindgren 1114 England St. Hunington Bch, CA. 89048 R. Parrish Lysbett (no address) Fred R. & Bette M. Martin 0279 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Thomas M. & Clydette Matheny 0086 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Kenneth L. & Eva Melby 0089 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Carl A. & Blanche Miller 1154 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Robert J. & Karen A. Miller 0352 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Donna M. Minard P.O. Box 398 Basalt, CO. James A. Penzotti & Kevin Fetch P.O. Box 232 Snowmass, CO. 81654 Wesley J. & Delores K. Pidcock 0607 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Lamar & Joan Podbevsek 1132 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Ron F. & Bonnie A. Radtke 1034 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Mike H. & Bonnie J. Rich 928 Pitkin Ave. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John A. & Susan L. Reeves 0701 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. John W. & Mary E. Reid Box 525 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Brook J. & Marilyn M. Robison 51519 Hwy 6 & 24 Apt. 16 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Leonard J. & Barbara Rosner 0942 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Velma F. & Fred M. Rowland 572 Galena St. Aurora, CO. 81611 Walter J. & Afton L. Roy 2922 Glen Ave. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Fredrick W. & Kathryn L. Schall P.O. Box 1004 Carbondale, CO. Marshall L. & Sharon J. Schield Box 847 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Edward J. Schwab 1032 Pitkin Ave. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Donald S. & Marilyn M. Shipanik 0215 Meadow Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Larry D. & Helen A. Shoup 1107 Willoch Dr. Racino, WI. 53406 Arthur Small 812 Grand Avenue Glenwood Spgs, CO. Edward J. & Virginia M. Smith 0543 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Jack A. & Nina D. Sonnier Box 1991 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Donald Stanfield 0795 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Hall & Mary B. Stewart 0784 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Richard & Delores Stutsman Box 188 Aspen, CO. Gary A. Sutherland 809 Grand Avenue Glenwood Spgs, CO. Dale R. & Suzanne Titus Box 31 Glenwood Spgs, CO. M. J. & Betty J. Turnipseed P.O. Box 1089 Carbondale, CO. Joseph Vittum 01701 Fairway Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. William R. & Linda B. Walden 158 N. Gypsum Creek Rd. Gypsum, CO. 81637 John A. & Letitia L. Wenisch P.O. Box 2913 Aspen, CO. Warren T. & Linda K. Wienke Box 340 El Jebel, CO. John Wix Box X Basalt, CO. Jean 0. Wood 821 Grand Avenue Glenwood Spgs, CO. • • WESTBANK - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Alfred W. & Cora J. Wright P.O. Box 1292 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Roger W. & Ardis J. Wulf 1329 Pitkin t8 Glenwood Spgs, CO. Clinton D. & M. Louise York Box 1513 Glenwood Spgs, CO. J. Robert Young 0110 Oak Ln. Glenwood Spgs, CO. Emmett G. Jr. & Dixie J. Zerr 0676 Westbank Rd. Glenwood Spgs, CO. TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY THE UNDERSIGNED PETITIONERS, ALL OF WHOM ARE RESIDENTS AND/OR PROPERTY OWNERS IN WESTBANK FILINGS 1, 2 and 3 HEREBY REQUEST THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NOT TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY SEWERAGE SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN THE PRESENT WESTBANK SUB- DIVISION TO SERVE HILLVUE ACRES AND WESTBANK FILING NO. 4. DATE FILING LOT NAME ADDRESS / « n , c / / �-.7—" G"iG''t/� V /-22 / / 'L .a./ / V �� to" 4 ///7 // r- ,e_.- Tti i 29 6 ' i 7---) / ,,,„‘" AIPP //.-5-0-., 'c . Al 4.d.A.% I r .I t I. L ". ..1A ,i o/7' 3 q3.1 II M I 111 El EWA IIIIIIL�� ' �� , �?111111EMEMEMN v 0 V }1A' k -A. • C1 ---1.- 77,,,,,;„:„,,,,, • xi c�,� . , t, 7GLc �cc'e-re / Oz= Ca --2- � i47.20 & I0 / /7 ` ,!- 1111-4-1÷%..--.- ' oz., • Lu. io-l '2/' i s 7- 7 r 16 L! 2 iii/, /rlsL ?"0--&-":-c---/- 2,- 3 .3 , . %a 1- 1..„4-,a- a 3 ,y4 72'>.-4-4- o' • 'cc s ,t ` G rim gip.. -- 6 3 C ? `%e z.) WI* , Md 3 r? /J-' L» Iv 1 zk _ . /7C „..,. .. �i _ ., 1t;/ -- tac �� �� y ;�. .c • r ��s s, `7' l : --�`I/ Jam. > 1;� i _d_ t� --a, 7/ 3 ‘,.,),„4-,,,, �E_ , TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY THE UNDERSIGNED PETITIONERS, ALL OF WHOM ARE RESIDENTS AND/OR PROPERTY OWNERS IN WESTBANK FILINGS 1, 2 and 3 HEREBY REQUEST THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NOT TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY SEWERAGE SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN THE PRESENT WESTBANK SUB- DIVISION TO SERVE HILLVUE ACRES AND WESTBANK FILING NO. 4. DA TE FILING i LOT NAME ADD' \ ,141 a , . ,iik, k ti• , ' 4' 14.1 LLAV 9 ',.-A, , 0 inr.1011 ' ' / 61 ir LO - AL_ t - fe /c_ . :,' .2., S IST .1 . 0 W1 ' A my , O t _::, irrAir 0 ' 29 & IS;Iiii.V4 CA) , _ .0 , 1,.1.../-.. Art—. A ./..,'. d 1 ID )1; gia 2./ 06) oirp IPAPPIANI,. - ` PAWITP #-47,Argi 0,-, , , tioti ' dri., ,. '° ze MEM t arait. y ._.... 0.., i / 7e .1 - g P-0 / AlliffillrffliW Afr‘midwc...."' /ir 6)27 1 2di/ i Pew / II 'ALILL (...-aft- .5- 4 -ALA AmoLoli.A0 ' 41*. /2) ‘,4 -.(' -a' 4 v-- / 6 Al f/ -4 9 i /d /0; A Ow: :2- .war al ,1T.'4' . . .._ 6_ 4mieTfti AtkuloW e967.3?._ f4lga,,,A0 0 011111 & !‘ \ i. -..a p-172;71cf \ g LIM 7D-.) 7 /0. (0-.9 1 , 11111 11111 Ellir ' ) 4 p1 ' _ At , 0,/„2 ‘)&k e i W 0-4.11..tAL O c,</ t,tgAlkaAtk 61_&64 o n 5- W , .... -.ank....0 W.A." -.A TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY THE UNDERSIGNED PETITIONERS, ALL OF WHOM ARE RESIDENTS AND/OR PROPERTY OWNERS IN WESTBANK FILINGS 1, 2 and 3 HEREBY REQUEST THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NOT TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY SEWERAGE SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN THE PRESENT WESTBANK SUB- DIVISION TO SERVE HILLVUE ACRES AND WESTBANK FILING NO. 4. DATE FILING LOT NAME ADDRESS O47 3 . , , /(.,. 7 ,. Tr? , 1 . 3 1/1 0)o ,i 3 3 O / / '%1,0,,,,,7,),L -21._e_ it,_4y i r -z- 3 \ )1\ _ d ©z \AS)._Ca)\6,A.,k_ '' <' 2 �f CIA -z4_ L i) .LY/79 �jj `% .'"r- ( C di L _ G SL% 27/7,,,C y F g,4c,,-;,,,,,,,,./Z----- 0 6 < _./c2/1._4.` /»-1 �% -,/ X11 6.1_ei ,,��,e to f 1 .', A/ --7r 3 ,F 4ez, ` � 11=,I.. 7 (1 3 1.t,fi r+'r ril N V Au i r(ezi oioa Ja,LAA�ax NCO d. %At. c am . it -d -q9 a .124<_} a5 u_Lh, (j. &L4'# / 5: 1 /9 a Allr' f f fr- s"-79 ) ) q i1d-w h�t_ c -,-,et- 0 i 0 6) 0-1...� / 1 ,ft , •-k/P 'r7 0,99 . .A2,27 -4 -ea. 0 D $9 9 � ��lAOcie, 11WP--::-.2/ � e. /' • • \ OMENS • • • ale • ' . �11. lies-- I T4Rpg SMR' :s" - 363 Y4Ra 405 • '4e A c CLUBHOUSE B : SWIMMING POOL C = TENNIS COURTS X. A. t.Fl • • WESTBANK RANCH SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 4 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE COVENANTS Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd., a Colorado limited partnership, by and through its duly authorized general partner, Westbank Development Co., Incorporated, a Colorado corporation, or its designated general partner, as the fee owner of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, desiring to insure the development and continuity of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, as a residential subdivision for itself, its successors, legal representatives, assigns and grantees, hereby declares to and for the benefit of all persons who may hereafter purchase and from time to time own lots in Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, that said ownership and holding of said lots shall be sub- ject to the following protective covenants and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to be appurtenant to and run with the land and inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the owners of said lots, their heirs, successors, and assigns. ARTICLE I Purpose of Covenants 1. It is the intention of the fee owner of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, expressed by the execution of this instrument, that the lands within Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, be developed and maintained as a highly desirable rural residential area. It is the purpose of these covenants that the present natural beauty, natural growth, and native setting and surrounding of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, always be protected insofar as is possible in connection with the uses and structures permitted by this instrument. ARTICLE II fDlefinitions 1. Westbank Ranch Subdivision. Whenever the terms "Westbank Ranch Subdivision", "Westbank Ranch", or "Westbank" are used in these covenants, they shall mean all the lands included in Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, and as described on the plat filed for record with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. 2. Residence. The term "Residence" as used herein shall be construed and held to include single family dwellings -and any dwelling place containing more than one family unit. 3. Residential Purpose. The term"Residential Purpose" as used herein shall be construed and held to include the use of a residence as a home and principal dwelling place by the owner thereof. 4. Family. The term "Family" or "Family Unit" shall mean a household composed of man and wife, and children, and/or other relatives having natural or moral duties to core for one another. • • Page Two Proposed Protective Covenants - Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing No.4 ARTICLE III Membership in Westbank Ranch Homeowners Association 1. All persons or associations (other than the Westbank Ranch Homeowners' Association) who own or acquire the title in fee to any of the land in Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, or other lands owned by the Declarant adjacent to said subdivision which may be subsequently subdivided by the Declarant and included by it in the Westbank Ranch Homeowners' Association (other than lands dedicated to public use) by whatever means acquired, shall automatically become members of the Westbank Ranch Homeowners Association, to be created as a non=profit Colorado corporation in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation of said Westbank Ranch Homeowners' Association, its successors and assigns, to be filed with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Once the Articles of Incorporation of said Westbank Ranch Homeowners' Association are filed as referred to above, subsequent fee owners of property within the Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, shall become members of said association in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation as presently in effect and as the same may be duly amended from time to time and also re- corded in the records of Garfield County, Cblorado. ARTICLE IV Architectural Control Committee 1. The Architectural Control Committee shall consist of Mr. John Huebinger and Mrs. Dolores Huebinger, or three or more members appointed by them, which members shall be owners of lots in Westbank Ranch Subdivision. Said Architectural Control Committee shall have and exercise all of the powers, duties and responsibilities set out in this instrument. 2. Approval by Architectural Control Committee. Before anyone shall commence the construction, remodeling, addition to, or alteration of any building, swimming pool, wall, fence, coping, or other structure whatsoever, on any lot, there shall be submitted to the declarant for transmittal to the architectural Control Committee, two complete sets of the plans and specifications for said work and no such structure or im- provement of any kind shall be erected, altered, placed or maintained upon any lot unless and until the final plans, elevations and specifica- tions therefore have received such written approval as herein provided. Such plans shall include plot plans showing the location on the lot or property of the wall, fence, coping, or other such structure proposed to be constructed, placed, altered, or maintained, and elevation of same, together with the proposed color schemes for roofs, and exteriors thereof, indicating materials for same. The committee shall have the right to refuse to approve any such plans or specifications, which are not suitable or desirable in its opinion, for aesthetic or other reasons, and in so passing upon such plans and specifications, it shall have the right to take into consideration the suitability of the proposed building, structure or other imporvement and of the materials of which it is to be built, to the site upon which it is proposed to erect the same, the harmony thereof with the surroundings and the effect of the building or other structure as planned, on the outlook from the adjacent or neighboring property. • • Page Three Proposed Protective Covenants-Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing No.4. 3. Method of Approval. The Architectural Control Committee shall approve or disapprove in writing, said plans and specifications within thirty days from the receipt thereof. One set of said plans and specifications with the approval or disapproval shall be retained by the committee. In the event no action is taken to approve or disapprove such plans and specifications within said thirty day period, the pro- vision requiring approval of said plans and specifications shajl be deemed to have been waived. 4. Architectural Control Committee Not Liable. The Architectural Control Committee shall not be responsible to any person or entity in any manner whatsoever for any defect in any plans or specifications sub- mitted nor as revised by said committee, or for any work done pursuant to the requested changes of said plans and specifications. ARTICLE V General Restrictions on Use 1. Zoning Regulations. No lands within Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, shall ever be occupied or used by or for any structure or purpose or in any manner which is contrary to the applicable zoning reg- ulations of Garfield County, Colorado. 2. Mining, Drilling or Quarrying. No mining, drilling, quarrying, tunneling or excavating for any substance within the earth, including oil, gas, minerals, gravel, sand, rock and earth shall be permitted within the limits of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, except as necessary for declarant and/or developer to extract gravels and soils necessary for the construction of improvements to and within Filing 4. 3. Business, Commercial or Trade Uses. No lands within Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, shall ever be occupied or used for any commercial, business or trade purpose and nothing shall be done on any of said lands which is a nuisance or might become a nuisance to the owner or owners of said lands, excepting use of a portion of the lands for sale of lots by the Declarant shall be permitted. 4. Animals and Agriculture. Residents may keep dogs, cats or other animals which are bona fide household pets on lands within West - bank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, so long as such pets'are not kept for commercial purposes and do not make objectional noises or otherwise constitute a nuisance or inconvenience to any of the residents of West - bank Ranch. No cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, poultry or other livestock shall be kept or maintained on any lot. No lands shall be used for agricultural purposes except for normal residential gardening of flowers, fruits and vegetables. 5. Signs. No advertising or signs of any character shall be erected, placed, permitted or maintained on any log or structure within Westbank Ranch other than one "For Sale" or one "For Rent" sign approved by the Architectural Control Committee and a name plate and street number of the occupant. • • Page Four Proposed Protective Covenants-Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing No. 4. 6. Resubdivision. No lot described in the plat of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, shall ever be resubdivided into smaller lots or tracts, nor conveyed or encumbered in any less than the full original dimensions as shown on said recorded plat except lots allowing more than one dwelling may be resubdivided in such a manner as to have seperate encumberances on each dwelling with remaining portion of lots to be common area for dwellings within said lots. 7. Combining Lots. If two or more contiguous residential lots are owned by the same owner, they may be combined into one lot by means of a written document executed and acknowledged by the owner thereof, approved by the Architectural Control Committee, and recorded in the real property records of Garfield County, Colorado. 8. Service Yards and Trash. Each residence must maintain an enclosed service yard of sufficient size to conceal garbage cans, clothes lines, wood piles and storage piles from lots,: roads and all common areas within or adjacent to Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4. No above ground oil, gas or water tanks shall be permitted on any lot. 9. Underground Utility Lines. All utility pipes and lines within the limits of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, must be buried under- ground and may not be carried on overhead poles nor above the surface of the ground. All such services must be buried underground from the point where said utilities take off from transformers and terminal points supplied by the developer. 10. Construction of Dwelling House. All construction and altera- tion work shall be prosecuted diligently and each building, structure or improvement which is commenced on any residential lot shall be completed within twelve months from the commencement of construction. No persons may live in or use as a dwelling place a partially constructed building. In the event of a breach of this covenant, the Declarant and/or Westbank Ranch Homeowners' Association shall have the right to complete construc- tion of any incompleted building, structure and improvement under the provisions of Article VII, paragraph 2 hereof. 11. Temporary Structures. No temporary house, trailer, tent, garage or outbuilding shall be place or erected upon any part of any lot in Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing 4, provided, however, that during the actual construction of any improvement on any lot, necessary temporary buildings for the storage of materials may be erected and maintained by the person doing the construction. 12. Towers and Antennas.No towers or radio and television antennas shall be erected or permitted to remain on any residential lot within Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4, except that normal radio and television antennas attached to a dwelling house may project up to six feet above the highest point of the roof of the structure. Page Five Proposed Protective Covenants-Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing No.4. • • 13. Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting and light standards on residential lots shall be approved by the Architectural Control Committee for harmonious development and the prevention of lighting nuisance to other residents of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4. 14. Garbage Disposal and Sanitary Systems. Each dwelling house containing a kitchen in Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing 4, shall be equipped with a garbage grinder or garbage disposal unit of a type approved by the Architectural Control Committee. No sewage disposal system or sanitary system shall be constructed or used on any lot unless fully.;approved as to design, capacity, location and construction by all proper public health agencies of the State of Colorado and the County of Garfield, and also by the Architectural Control Committee. The minimum sanitation facility must include primary and secondary treatment with ultimate subsurface disposal. 15. Set Back Restrictions. Every building, structure or other improvement, other than fences, terraces and steps, shall be set back at least 50 feet from the street lot line, 25 feet from the side lot lines and 30 feet from the rear lot line, as the same are shown on the recorded plat of Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4. Placement of any and all structures on lots within Westbank Ranch Subdivision, filing 4, must be approved by the Architectural Control Committee prior to the commencement of construction. 16. Walls and Fences. Walls, fences and coping shall be limited to six feet in height measured from the adjoining ground surface inside the wall or fence; Boundary planting along any lot lines, except trees with single trunks,hall not be permitted to grow higher than eight feet. No chain link fences shall ever be permitted in Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4,unless written approval is given by Declarant and/or Architec- tural Control Committee and then said fencing shall be limited to tennis courts, common R.V. storage yards and other facilities in common. 17. Cleanliness and Unsightly Growth. Each lot shall at all times be kept in a clean, sightly and wholesome condition. No trash, litter, junk, boxes, containers, bottles, cans, implements, machinery, lumber, or other building materials shall be permitted to remain exposed on any lot so as to be visable to any neighboring lot, road, or the Westbank Ranch Golf Course, except as is necessary during the period of contruction. Each lot shall at all times be kept clear of weeds and other unsightly growth, and any and all landscaping that becomes objectionable or inter- feres with the operation of the golf course, on demand by the declarant, shall be forthwith removed by the property owner. 18. Golf Course. The Westbank Ranch Golf Course, when constructed, shall abut some of the property within Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4. Easements to permit the doing „of every act necessary and proper to the playing of golf on the golf course adjacent to any of the lots which may be subject to these restrictions are hereby granted and established. These acts shall include, but not be limited to, the recovery of golf balls over and upon such lots, the noise level created by the playing of the game of golf, together with all the other usual and common activity associated with the game of golf and with the normal and usual activities associated with the operation of a golf or country club. • • Page Six Proposed Protective Covenants-Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing No.4. ARTICLE VI Easements Reserved 1. Easements and rights of way in perpetuity are hereby resefved for the erection, construction, maintenance and operation of wires, cables, pipe, irrigation ditches (in addition to any irrigation ditches which now exist in place), conduits and apparatus for the transmission of electrical current, telephone, television and radio lines and for the furnishing of water, gas and sewer in the str-et or for the furnishing of other utility purposes together with the right of entry for the purpose of installing, maintaining and improving said utilities along, across, upon and through a strip of land eight feet in width along the rear and side lot lines of all lots in Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4 ARTICLE VII Enforcement 1. Judicial Relief. Any violation of the provisions, Conditions or restrictions contained herein shall warrant the declarant or any othee lot owner to apply to any court of law or equity having jurisdiction thereof for an injunction or proper relief in order to enforce same in court, and, in its discretion, may award the plaintiff his court costs and reasonable attorneys fees. No delay on the part of the declarant or any other person in the exercising of any right, power, or remedy contained herein shall be construed as a waiver thereof or an acquiescence therein. Various rights and remedies of all persons hereunder shall be cumulative and the declarant or any other property owner may use any or all of said rights without in any way affecting the ability of the declarant or any other property owner to use or rely upon or enforce any other right. 2. Declarant's Right to Remey Violations. If the Owner of any lot in Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing 4 shall default in the per= formance of any covenant or condition hereof or shall violate any of the covenants or rules herein contained, the declarant or the Westbank Ranch Homeowners' Association may, after 30 days notice to said owner, or without notice, if in the opinion of the declarant or association an emergency exists, perform such covenant or condition or remedy such violation for the account and at the expense of the said owner. If the declarant or association shall incur any expense, including reasonable attorneys fees in instituting, prosecuting (including an action against an owner for default or violation), or defending any action or proceeding instituted by reason of any defult or violation, said expenses shall be included and added to any judgement made or given to the declarant or party prosecuting same. ARTICLE VIII General Provisions 1. Covenants to Run. All the restrictions and covenants contained herein shall constitute covenants running with the land as to all of the Page Seven • • Proposed Protective Covenants-Westbank Ranch Subdivision, Filing No.4 lands within Westbank Ranch Subdivision. It shall continue to be binding upon the owners of said lands in all persons claiming by, through, or under said owners for a period of Twenty-one years from the date this document is filed for record with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, and shall thereafter automatically be extended for a further period of ten years; provided, however, that the owners of seventy-five percent of the lots in Westbank Ranch Subdivision may release all of the lots hereby restricted from any one or all of these restrictions by executing and acknowledging an appropriate instrument in writing for said purpose and filing same for record with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, in the manner then required for the recording of land instruments. 2. Benefit of All. The provisions contained herein are for the benefit of and shall be binding upon the declarant, its purchasers, and subsequent owners of each of said lots. Each purchaser of lots included within this declaration, by acceptance of a deed to same, shall be subject to each and all of the restrictions, conditions, covenants and agreements contained herein and to the jurisdiction, right and power of the declarant. And by such acceptance, shall for himself, his heirs, personal representatives, such acceptance, shall for himself, his heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, covenant and agree and consent to and with the grantees and subsequent owners of each of said lots, to keep, observe, comply with and perform said restrictions, covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein. 3. Variances. The declarant hereby reserves the right to grant a reasonable variance or adjustment of these conditions and restrictions in order to overcome practical difficulties and prevent unnecessary hardships arising by reason of the application of the restrictions contained herein. Such variances or adjustments shall be granted only in case the granting thereof shall not be materially detrimental or injurious to other property or improvements of the neighborhood and shall not defeat the general intent and purpose of these restrictions. 4. Severability In the event any one or more of the provisions, conditions, restrictions, or covenants contained herein shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be null and void, all remaining restrictions and covenants herein set forth shall remain in full force and effect. Executed this da., of 19 WESTBINNK RANCH NO 1, LTD, by its General Partner, Westbank Development Co., Incorporated or its designated general partner • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH NOUS 1979 fl j G pM LD CO. PtAVIER 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 320-8333 Frank Traylor, M.D., Executive Director DATE: November 2, 1979 SUBJECT: NON -STATE ASSISTANCE REVIEW AND COMMENTS TO: Mr. Ray Baldwin Planning Director Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 PROJECT TITLE: STATE IDENTIFIER: COMMENTS: Westbank Ranch, Filing No. 4 NA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL COMMENTS DUE: October 21, 1979 The development's impact upon local air quality has not been addressed ade- quately. Air quality considerations that should be addressed include the following: 1. What is the existing ambient air quality in the area? 2. What are the expected levels of emissions and the proposed control measures of the following construction/grading activities: a. earth moving and grading activities b. movement of vehicles on unpaved roads c. emissions from vehicle exhaust d. wind erosion of stripped areas e. tracking of dirt onto unpaved roadways and subsequent reentrainment 3. What are the expected levels of emissions and the proposed control measures of the following ongoing activities? a. emissions from movement of vehicles on unpaved roads b. dust reentrainment by auto traffic on paved roads c. wind erosion from exposed areas d. fireplace emissions e, motor vehicle emissions (continued on next page) SOC -3, Jan 79 Name, Title Micki Barnes, Program Administrator Air Pollution Contro'omments - Page 2 November 2, 1979 4. What is the projected maximum impact of this development on the ambient air quality levels --on-site and off-site? 5. Total area of the project is greater than 25 acres. Therefore, prior to construction, an emissions permit must be obtained from the Air Quality Control Commission. CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC. CENTENNIAL PLAZA, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623, (303) 963-1753 October 22, 1979 Mr. Ray Baldwin Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: Westbank Ranch Filing #4 Dear Ray: In response to Mr. Hyne's letter dated, October 10, 1979 (Colorado Geological Survey), we are submitting Plate 1 with the test boring locations for his information. When Lincoln-DeVore did the testing in 1978 the area was set up as Filing #2. After the design was started in 1979 the Filing Number was changed to Number 4. It is the same area. Please accept our apology in not changing the Filing Number from 2 to 4 on Lincoln- DeVore's report. Sincerely, Centennial Engineering Inc. C.A. Mill P.E. enclosure; CAM/jaf STATE OF COLORADO Richard D. Lamm, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • • DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Jack R. Grieb, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 (825-1192) Mr. Ray Baldwin, Planning Director Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glennwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Baldwin: OCT 18 1979 GARFILLD Lo. October 16, 1979 District Wildlife Manager Larry Green has reviewed Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4 with Mr. Dale Lauer, and I quote or paraphrase Larry's findings from an October 12, 1979 letter to me as follows: "I have no objections to the configuration of lots in Tract "A" (fartherest (sic) north grouping). It is currently located adjacent to other developed Westbank filings". Tracts "B" and "C" lie on a bench above Tract "A" and are valuable as deer winter range. This bench winters between 500 and 1000 deer, many of which moved into the currently developed Westbank Subdivision last winter to destroy shrubs and trees. With new filings to occur higher on the mountainside, more damage can be expected, with resulting loss of such native species as sagebrush. Larry Green said further, " I discussed the location of the greenbelt areas with Dale Lauer. The greenbelt between lots 33 and 34 is located at the head of a small drainage lined with Pinon-juniper cover and is probably the best location it can occupy to allow some deer movement into this gulch. However, I feel the greenbelt located between lots 30 and 31 should be located either where lots 27 or 28 are now located. This would allow for easier passage by a deer into the second and longer drainage traversing this subdivision. Dale Lauer advised me that he didn't think that would be any problem. Apparently its a problem since it doesn't appear to have been changed. Even if the greenbelt was only fifty to seventy-five feet wide it would give a deer a less obstructed passageway into the draw". Thank you for allowing us to comment on this subdivision filing. Larry Green's explanations seem clear to me; nevertheless, if a question should occur to you, please contact him directly. Sincerely, Bert Baker Wildlife Program Specialist cc: Larry Green, Bill Clark DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Harris Sherman, Executive Director • WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Michael Higbee, Chairman Wilbur Redden, Vice Chairman • Sam Caudill, Secretary • Jean K. Tool, Member • Vernon C. Williams, Member James Smith, Member • Donald Fernandez, Member • Richard Divelbiss, Member RICHARD D. LAMM GOVERNOR **AidgE,4102 GAI COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ocr21197.9 v. 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING — 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303) 839-2611 October 10, 1979 Mr. Ray Baldwin Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Baldwin: RE: WESTBANK RANCH FILING NO. 4 JOHN W. ROLD Director We are unable to evaluate the materials submitted concerning the Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4 because they are incomplete. The report on "General & Engineering Geology and Soils..." by Lincoln-DeVore appears to be well done and sufficient but it is identified as Westbank Subdivision, Filing No. 2. A map referred to as Plate 1 and a Test Boring Location Diagram are mentioned as being "attached." They were not included with the materials sent to us for review. It is very important that all pertinent maps and illustrations accompanying these reports be included for our review as they are usually a salient, if not absolutely necessary portion of the report. Please forward the above attachments and resolve the nomenclature difficulty if you can. If not, would you please request that Lincoln-DeVore or Centennial Engineering do so? Thank you for your cooperation in this regard. I will attempt to respond on this matter before your deadline if I receive the requested materials in time. JLH/gp cc: Land Use Commission Yours very truly, ef,% "y L. Hynes Engineering Geologist GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE RICHARD D. LAMM Governor • ocI 1979 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street - Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Administration (303) 839-3581 Ground Water (303) 839-3587 October 3, 1979 Mr. Ray Baldwin, Director Garfield County Planning Dept. 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Westbank Ranch, Filing 4 and Hillview PUD Dear Mr. Baldwin: W. R. SMITH ting, State Engineer We have reviewed the preliminary plan material submitted for the fourth filing of Westbank Ranch and the additional material submitted for the Hillview PUD. Six adjudicated wells are to be used for the water supply with combined appropriations of 260 gpm or 373,300 gallons per day. This is approximately three times the amount of water estimated to be necessary for the existing Westbank development and the proposed Westbank and Hillview developments. We feel that these wells represent a dependable water supply based upon their locations and we recommend approval of Westbank Ranch, Filing 4 and Hillview PUD. Very truly yours, JAD/GDV:mvf cc: Lee Enewolcl, Div. Eng. Ralph Stallman Land Use Comm. Jeris A. Danielson uty State Engineer Mount Iris Soil Conservation District P.0. BOX 1302 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 October 3, 1979 Mr. Ray Baldwin Planning Director 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear Ray: ocr 4441/4 The Mount Sopris Soil Conservation District has reviewed the West Bank Filing No. 4 Subdivision plan. The plan states that water from the Robertson Ditch will be used for irrigation in the subdivision. We feel an irritation water plan should be developed before construction begins. This will insure each lot owner of their water. There is no plan to revegetate disturbed areas. Steep slopes should be terraced and revegetated. Slopes should not exceed 2:1, and 3:1 are better for revegetation. Because of the variations in the soil characteristics, we recommend an on-site investigation be done before construction. This should be done by a qualified soils engineer. Sincerely, Richard Cerise Secretary RC/te CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT • • Roaring Fork School District RE -1 P.O. Box 820 Glenwood Springs , Colorado 81601 Telephone (303) 945-6558 September 26, 1979 MA.. Ray Bacdwin, Vi. ecton Gan6.beld County Planning Department 2014 Stafne Avenue Glenwood Sp44c:ngs, Co.eonado 81601 RE: Westbarth Ranch Fits Lg #4 Dean Mn. Ba2dw-i.n: NICHOLAS R. MASSARO, Superintendent DWIGHT L. HELM, Assistant Superintendent WALLACE M. PARKER, Assistant Superintendent, Business The Board o6 Education o.6 Rosining Fotk Schaal D.catt ct RE -1 cs recommending the da. ta& value donation o6 one ache o6 land bon. each ,6ibty homes.c tea and the dottan value o6 said donation to be deposited with the Gaqleld County Comm.i.rsionerb to be used by the school di.rtn,%ct bon the pwtchabe o6 1u -tune schooe sites. Ninety-eight sites wowed nepnesent the doeean value ob 1.96 aches. The Board at40 requests that deveeoperr be noti6ied that extension oS bus senv-.ce into the subdivision is not planned due to .the £ncneasing costa of such service. Sincerely yours, Ni hoLaa R. Mariano l.� ✓�G2.Zz1 L.P. ZANCANELLA, Chief VIC ROSA, Asst.Chief • • MARTIN ZEMLOCK, Captain JACK MITCHELL, Secy. Treas. MIKE FATTOR, Lieut. Glenwood Springs Fire Department Member of Colorado State Firemen's Association Box 2043 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Oct. 5, 1979 Garfield County Planning Dept. 2014 Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs Colo. Dear Sir: Reference: Westbank filling 4 OCT 5 1979 I beleive by information given to me by the Tax offices of Garfield county that this fillling 4 all falls under the Carbondale Fire protection district. 1. Still show much concern over the wells of westbank ranch being able to produce enough water to protect this complex and if the added load would prove more problem for fire protection water supply for existing homes aliready built at westbank. Added tanks would prove nothing if water is not available to store in them. 2. Height of upper lots would suffer low fire fighting water pressure with tank location. as shown on the map. 3. Show concern of road grade as far as winter travel for equipment access. L.P. Zancanella Fire Chief ROBERT DELANEY KENNETH BALCOMB JOHN A.THULSON EDWARD MULHALL, JR. ROBERT C. CUTTER SCOTT M. BALCOMB DAVID R. STURGES LAWRENCE R. GREEN • �r DELANEY & BALCOMB ATTORNEYS AT LAW DRAWER 790 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 September 25, 1979 Mr. Ray Baldwin Planning Director Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Ray: SEP 26 1979 818 COLORADO AVENUE 945-6546 TELEPHONE 945-2371 AREA CODE 303 RE: Westbank Ranch, Filing No. 4 I have received the information on Westbank Ranch, Filing No. 4 which you sent me. My comments are intended to run solely for the benefit of the Basalt Water Conservancy District with relation to the legal water supply of the proposed development. There is some doubt that the development is situate within the boundaries of the Basalt Water Conservancy District. As a result, my comments are advisory only (which they would be in any case). From a review of the material you sent me it is not an assured result that the residents of the proposed development would have a legal water supply in all years. Drought times might result in the domestic water supply due to relatively junior alluvial wells being called out of priority. I recommend that your department address this topic. I would be happy to supplement this discussion if requested. Very truly yours, DELANEY & BALCOMB By SB:sjg cc: James Larson, Esq. Floyd Crawford Scott Balcomb i i PLANNING COMMISSI O N Regular Members December 5, 1979 Members Present County Officials Present Carter Jackson Ray Baldwin, Planning Director Kelley Meyer Hope Roberts, Recording Secretary Barbara Lorah Laverne Starbuck John Tripp Arnold Mackley, Chairman The meeting was called to order at 7:39 p.m. by Chairman Arnold Mackley. Carter Jackson made a motion to approve the amended minutes of the November 12, 1979 meeting. Kelley Meyer seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA: Westbank Ranch Filing No. 4 Preliminary Plat Public Hearing continued Arnold Mackley explained this was a proposal for 101 units located adjacent to Westbank Ranch between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale. Ray Baldwin said there was still question on revegetation, cut and fill, roads and drainage. Ron Liston said their plan for revegetation consists of 3 elements which were seeding of the grounds, mulching and the use of seedlings. All of the disturbed area will be treated with this. Carl Miller stated they would still have the same size culverts and there would be 3 draws which the water would flow down. The water will he collected in a detention area and then drained. There was no way to get around large fill areas. The road winds and they still have to cross the gulches. There will be 300-400 feet of retention wall but they are still flexible on design. The face of the hill has been cut vertically and they would now like to taper it back. Ron Liston said they will now be putting in an 80,000 gallon storage tank which would give the development 50-60 pounds of pressure at all times if the tank was kept full. John Tripp asked if there was adequate space to build a house underneath the power lines. Ron Liston said it niiaht be one of the least desirable lots, hut there would be space and a 100' set back. Also, the 3 lots by the old quarry will be reshaped to accomodate building sites. There will also be guard rails on the roads. Al Wright said there was a lack of knowledge of where the drainage water will go once it meets Westbank, liked the revised drainage report, and stated (1) December 5, 1979 • • if the velocity of the water is moving fast enough all of the driveways from the upper part of the project will have to have two 48" culverts, the steepness of the slopes is dangerous. He also asked if the County would assume the responsi- bility of the access road, all disturbed areas need to be revegetated immediately and the construction is going to block up the drainage systems, the slopes were too steep for children to walk, and dangerous with vehicles. The majority of the people at Westbank are opposed to the access and bridge, and the sewage treatment is still an issue, and there is no need for this development. Ron Liston said that the culverts for the driveways would be provided by the developer and under a common driveway for 2 lots. Ray Baldwin said he would like to see a detailed construction plan at final plat. Also, the sewer plant is not necessarily part of the metro district. The metro district will have to be resubmitted to the Commissioners. The service plan does not include sewer. Barbara Lorah was appointed a voting member of the Board. Carter Jackson made a motion to recommend approval to the County Commissioners of Westbank, Filing 4 with the following, conditions: more detailed drainage information be given at final plat, a package sewer treatment plant be built by the developer and operated by the metro district, and to remind the Commissioners of their concerns about inadequacies of the bridge and the access of Highway 82. John Tripp seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. SECOND ITEM ON THE AGENDA: Snowmass Coal Company, Special Use Permit and Text Change Amendment Arnold Mackley explained this was a special use permit and text amendment for a coal loading facility on Diamond S Ranch 2 miles northwest of Carbondale. Ray Baldwin made the following statement: In regards to the Snowmass Coal application, I have the following comments: I am an adjacent property owner. Because of this, I do not feel I can be impartial in my recommendations. Therefore, in fairness to Snowmass Coal Company, I will not participate in any of the decision making process as Planning Director, but reserve the riaht to comment as a taxpayer and adjacent property owner in Garfield County. Tom Beocher from Western Associated Coal said they had met with the cattlemen to discuss a small portion of their property regarding access. They did not discuss the question of what additional things they would do outside that area as far as protection of cattle. When the time came that there was additional traffic, they would decide. They didn't know if there would be a problem, and it would be ridiculous to make substantial permanent facilities (2) November 12, 1979 acceptable to the homeowners association, and to further express concern to the County of the bridge and feel that the developers should share in the cost of improving it. Kelley Meyer seconded the motion. BOARD VOTE: For: John Tripp, Dale Albertson, Kelley Meyer, carter Jackson Opposed: Arnold Mackley SECOND ITEM ON THE AGENDA: Westbank Ranch, Filing No. 4, Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Chairman Mackley explained this was a proposed development of 101 units located adjacent to Westbank Ranch between Glenwood Springs and Carhondale. Ray Baldwin further explained it was located on the southwest side of the existing Westbank development, with single family small lots that are up to 4 units per lot, with the same water and sewage as Hillview. Ron Liston said the roads would he cut and fill and his primary concern was the first section of open space site. He showed maps of the cross section, and said some of the lower lots would be hack filled. There would be revegeta- tion with native grasses and plants. There would be re-establishing of what is there, terracing and retreatment of the slope. The longest fill slope would he 60-70 feet. He showed where the power lines would no across the lots and stated there would be a right-of-way pedestrian easement down to the park. The total lenath of road to where it flattens out is 1/2 mile with 8% grade. The road is a little over 1 mile, and there will be a retaining wall. Jeannette Wright, resident of Westbank, stated she felt something was wrong with their water situation now as the water pressure drops down to almost nothing on weekends. Ron Liston said there would be an additional storage tank of 120,000 gallons of water making 240,000 gallons total storage. Al Wright said he was concerned about the drainage; particularly, no provisions were made for homes constructed in the upper portion. He felt the developers were playing with numbers. Carl Miller said that an engineer had designed the drainage system and it met County specifications. Ron Liston said there would be a culvert under the road on a gulch and above that there would be an overflow culvert so there would be some retention over the road. It would act as a safety valve. Ray Baldwin read letters frm the reviewing agencies, and suggested more information be obtained regarding drainage and revegetation. -3- November 12, 1979 • Carter Jackson made a motion to continue the public hearing and ask the developers for more information on capacity of flood structures and road design, the revegetation plan, and water storage with pressure at the highest lots. Dale Albertson seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous. THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA: Horizon's West Subdivision Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Arnold Mackley explained this was a proposal for 55 sinale family lots on 280 acres located approximately 1 mile east of Rifle. Harry Coombs stated he had wastewater rights, was concerned about a pipeline going through the area, and stated they have a deed to the reservoir. He would like some guarantee they can keep the water. Dotti Pretti stated they had no intention of over riding their water in any way. Ken Latham asked how the water from the ditch would be measured for the homeowners. Gary Dean advised that their lawyer was working on that and it would be ready at the final plat. He also stated there was no way A° measure the water after it left the headaate. Dale Alberton suggested possibly the water could be measured by a weir and the Water Commission could deside. Gary Dean said that if the homeowners association handles the water, they could decide. Ken Latham said he had no objection to the subdivision as long as he is guaranteed of getting the water that is ajudicated to him. Gary Dean said they would set up a meeting with everyone before the final plat. Ray Baldwin read letters from the reviewing agencies. Kelley Meyer made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat to the Board of County Commissioners with the following conditions: 1. The ditch water situation be worked out with Mr. Latham and Mr. Coombs and that the location of the Coombs reservior be determined and no lot will be a part of that reservoir. 2. A 30,000 gallon water tank be installed. 3. A 2.0 acre site in the northeast corner of Lot 6, Block E be designated for future installation of water storage facilities. 4. An easement be dedicated to Public Service for installation of a gas regulator station site in the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block B. 5. A 60' easement for road -4- • FCCp-ivfig-cR". do A S DNIE I T1VAIU For office use only APPLICATION AND DATA FORM TO LEASE WATER FROM WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT A. APPLICANT Name IimXiv)&x Kenneth Ba Address p• - •• Glenwood Telephone Number 303 945 -6546 Authorized Agent or Representative 0 S t• Ken Balcomb B. WATER RIGHT OWNED BY Wel APPLICANT I� Name of Right Type of Structure or R ght Locaton �test fhwt4of ofe Po Dthvers So>°tzeast 3-n The B w fll in the No f C. Township 6 S the South % cor Sou J1 plots 1481 feet from the Water Court Case No. Well Permit No. INTENDED USE OF LEASED WATER Location of Area of UseThe Ovens property located in Descr pt on of Use N/A 1 i • . •o -fie 2055• eet. The KB well East Sectaon from theedl SouthSection 66 tline. water Water w i purposes to serve the Number of Dwell Total Acreage stem Proposed Potable Water Sy Proposed Waste -Vater Treatment System tan an each field systems. Pro acted Monthly Volume of Leased Water Needed n Gallons: A r. May 35,849 Jan.19, 554Feb.18Aure•2S0 5t.�at.22 81 June42, 367Ju1y g j I 2 p 29 Nov. >75 4Dea. 9,554 Annual Total Gallons 319,382 Acre Feet 0.90 Maximum Instantaneous Demand 15gpm 0 will be used on the Coke tion e a.ove escri e use or ven u avis e sec cornmer ion ng Un is 4 lots (12 EQR's) 8 cia tan•ar• septic D. OTHER REMARKS DATE • • Contract 1 ,5D O -b A,13 Map ID 1 Date Activated WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Water Allotment Contract Name of Applicant: 7c)-//1/1 /71!ct/li, c` /fid 1e/H /114Z? Quantity of water in acre feet Applicant, hereby applies to the West Divide Water Conservancy District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of C.R.S. 1973, 37-45-101, et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the "District") for an allotment contract to beneficially and perpetually use water or water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution of this application, and subsequent delivery and use of water, Applicant hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions: 1. Water Rights: Applicant shall own water rights at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to divert water, which will be supplemented by water leaned herein. If Applicant intends to divert through a well, it must be understood by Applicant that no right to divert exists until a valid well permit is obtained from the State Engineer. 2. Quantity: Water applied for by the Applicant in the amount set forth above shall be diverted at Applicant's point of diversion from the District's direct flow water rights, and when water is unavailable for diversion pursuant to administration by the Colorado State Engineer during periods when said direct flow water right is not in priority, the District shall release for the use of Applicant up to said quantity in acre-feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by the District. It is understood that any quantity allotted from direct flow, storage or otherwise, to the Applicant by the District will be limited by the priority of the District's decrees and by the physical and legal availability of water from District's sources. Any quantity allotted will only be provided so long as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the terms and conditions of this contract. The District and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, and the ability of the District to allot direct flow rights to the Applicant may be dependent on the consent of the Colorado River Water Conservation District. If at any time the Applicant determines it requires less water than the amount herein provided, it may so notify the District in writing, and the amount of water allotted under this contract shall be reduced permanently in accordance with ouch: notice, Rates shall be adjusted accordingly in following water years only. 3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial Use: Any and all water allotted Applicant by the District shall be used for the following beneficial use or uses: Municipal, domestic and related uses, or irrigation and commercial (except to the extent that Ruedi water may not be available for irrigation and commercial as those terms are defined on page 5 of Contract No. 2-07-70-W0547 between the United States and the West Divide Water Conservancy District). Applicant's beneficial use of any and all water allotted shall be within or•through facilities or upon land owned, leased, operated, pr under Applicant's control. 4. Decrees and Delivery: Exchange releases made by the District out of storage from Ruedi Reservoir, or other works or facilities of the District, or from other sources available to the District, shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facilities or at the decreed point of -1- • • diversion for said other sources, and release or delivery of water at such outlets or points shall constitute performance of the District's total obligation. Delivery of water by the District from Ruedi Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contract with the United Staten Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities available to District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby expressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end of each water year (December 31), shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water. Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right, and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado State Engineer to estimate any conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate point, and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case. The District, or anyone using the District's decrees, may call on any additional sources of supply that may be available at an alternate point of diversion, (though not at the original point of diversion) only as against water rights which are junior to the date of application for the alternate point of diversion. • 5. Alternate Point of Diversion and Plan of Augmentation: Decrees for alternate pointe of diversion of the District's water rights or storage water may be required in order for Applicant to use the water service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining such decree is the exclusive responsibility of Applicant. The district reserves the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judicial approval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to serve Applicant's facilities or lands. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the procedures and legal and engineering costs necessary for any changes in water rights contemplated herein and further agrees to indemnify the District from any costs or losses related thereto. Applicant is solely responsible for providing works and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver them to Applicant's intended beneficial use. Irrespective of the amount of water actually transferred to the Applicant's point of diversion, the Applicant shall make annual payments to the District based upon the amount of water allotted under this agreement. In the event the Applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion and to develop an augmentation plan and institute legal proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted to Applicant hereunder, the Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates its own augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to pay any amount under paragraph 18 below. In any event, the District shall have the right to approve or disapprove the Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the water court in the adjudication thereof. 6. Annual Payment: Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District at a per acre-foot rate. The initial annual payment shall be made, in full, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment -2- Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District at a per acre-foot rate. The initial annual the date payment shall of notice be made, d ,the in full, within thirty (30) day after Applicant that the initial payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of ahe water delivery year to which the initial payment shall ap nnd tfhdeveror each hich is applicable to that year. Annual payments thereafter shall be due and payable by the Applicant on or before each January 1. If an annual payment is not made by the ecduto ate, written notice thereof will be sent by Applicant at such address as may be designated by the Applicant in writing. (If no address has been so designated in writing, then said notice shall heart not to o waters years addrehall srequire s set rpaymentrth efor Water usesefor any year. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to re entire water prevent the District from adjusting the annual rate in its sole discretion for future years only. If payment is not made within ten (10) days atter the date of said written notice, Applicant shall at District's sole option have no further right, title or interebe t under this contract without further notice and delivery maycurtailed; and the allotment of water, as herein made, may be transferred, d, leaDirsed, crofotherwise he etrisposed of at the discretion of the 7. Securit : As security to the District,the e foregoing covenant of annual payments in advance of delivery, will be fully met by annual budget and appropriation of funds from such sources of revenues as may beol ha lyia available to the Applicant. As additional security person, Applicant will hold harmless the District othe governmental corporation, quasi -governmental entity,e entity, for discontinuance in service herein due to the contemplated ed fonthea Applicant to maintain the payments current basis. Applicant agrees to defray any out-of-pocket expenses -incurred by the District in connection tlwith them the toallotmentsof wawater er rights hereunder, including, water regal and adjudication necessary to allow fApplicant's tuse nof such rights and adjudication allotted water rights. B. Asti nment: This agreement shall inure to the except h no asssi,gnmentsuccessors shallrbeassigns permitt dthe inparties eventhereto, the cept that be used waternwhich allotted be subdivided or ortoo otherwise for heldthe orbenefit owned in land separate ownership interests by two (2) or more users of the water right allotted hereunder. In no event shall the owner of a of the Applicant's property to be portion, but less than all, rights hereunder. Any served under this contract, have anyrights as the assignment of the Applicant's rights usuch ;req creyzract shall be subject to, and must comply with, District may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of cones and tract rights and the assumption erein shallact preventgsuccessorsations by atoianportion successora. Nothing property from applying to the District for of Applicant's individual and separate allotment contracts. 9. Other, Rules' Applicant shall be boundhe rthe rules provisions of t e Water onservancy. Act of Colorado/ by all rules and regulation the d Board supplementsotheretothe ands by and all amendments thereof applicable law. 10. o•era •1 eraanonHan ntannnce A enance a greement' Applicantwth the shall enter into an pons the Board of DDistrict under irectors of the tDistrict, if and erms and iwhen, the Board of said District -3- • • determines in its sole discretion that such an agreement is required. Said agreement may contain, but shall not be limited to, provisions for additional annual monetary ldconsideration additional extension of District delivery services aadministration, operation, and maintenance costs; or for other costa to the District which may arise through services made available to the Applicant. 11. Chance of Use: or disapprovetanyserves the proposed change exclusive in right to review, reapprove use of the water allotted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotted hereunder without the prior written approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this contract. 12. Use and Place of Us?: Applicant agrees to use the water in the manner and on the property described in the documents submitted to the District at the time this agreement is executed (said documents are incorporated herein by this reference thereto), or in any operation and maintenance agreement provided by Applicant. Any use other than as set forth thereon or any lease or permitted sale paragraph water above,water shall rights deemed herein, to beother than as amaterial breach of this agreement. 13. Titles It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall be interpreted to give the Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest in or to any water or water rights referred to herein. 14. Conservation: Applicant shall use commonly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water right conservations adopted dhereafter agrees ythe tDistrict o be bound for use any District owned oc controlled water or water rights. 15. Restrictions: Applicant shall restrict uses as follows (unleee specific waivers are appended to this agreement). Violation of these restriotlone shell be doomed to be a material breach of this agreement. Use Annual Maximum Divorsion Household Domestic (includes lawn) Livestock (cattle) Irrigation 1/3 acre foot 1 - 3 acre feet 1 acre foot/100 head 2 - 3 acro feet/acre 16. Well Permits If Applicant intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit before District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder. 17. Representations: By executing this agreement, Applicant agrees that he is not relying on any legal or engineering advice that he may believe he has received from the District. Applicant further acknowledges that he has obtained all necessary legal and engineering advice from bis own sources other than the District. Applicant further acknowledges that the District makes no guarantees, warranties, oc assurances whatsoever about the quantity or quality of water available pursuant to this agreement. Should the District be unable to provide the water contracted for herein, no damages agains Uistri t normay Applicant obtaia refassessed be refund from theDiatrictt the 18. Costs of Water Court Pilings Should the District, in its own discretion, choose to include Applicant's contract herein in a water court filing for alternate point of diversion or plan of augmentation, then Applicant hereby agrees to pay to the District, when assessed, an additional fee representing the District's. actual and reasonable costs and Lees for Applicant's share of the proceeding. -4- FROM RUSSELL GEORGE FAX NO 303 637 0328 APR -26-1993 16 26 FROSTUUER R. GEORGE P.C. TO • APR 26.1993 06:16 PM P 1 113378328 P.02 19. biadin9 Agre. This Agreement shall tot be cosplete nor binding upon the b tint uni.is attatRsd hereto is the forty *otitis.' *Application for Putc2►asae of Waters from the Nest Divide hater C,n$sgYancy District' fully vompLeted b Applicant and approved by the aistriat'a engineer. Said ettsahsemte shall by tris reference thereto be inoOrporatld into the Woo of this &eraatsent. 20. Rar 1 is IT Is THR SOLI' ResPO fIhILITY 01 TUN APPLICANT TO 08TAIN A—VALID NULL. MUT OR OTJAR WATER RIOS? IX ORM TO DIM' .SAUa. ssCLUDima Teat taTga =CM= Q W THIS CONTRACT. IT IN Td8 CONT/NUIINO AG?Y OF TOM APPLICANT TO MAIM= TNA VALIDITY OP ' IUr watt EMIT 0a NAM MST INCLUDING PILING PCA mama OP 'WORM man WELL COstPLIDTlON MOWS, PILING WATER S .; SINUFICIAL i/ICTAL USAOOIN OR MAN BAST WVIZ L =BOOT ING TSS MASTS. WATER TO BTATS or cotom o ) ) lis. COUNTY OF CARPISLD ) By APPLICANT AI:Wangs Ohs for tg instrument was aakn vled ed be Axe,ms Op this day od _. r 1nal. by �. �d11 /10440. Witness ay hand end ollLoisl seal. X78 0018% lin •Isteas (O SPR)N08.00 B1801 _ A . ; .. Maj 3,19 "ry n • ORDER After a hearing by the sosrd of Directors of the West Divide Nater ConsesvafCy DiattICt on the above application, it if hereby oMDISSO that said application ba 'ranted and this vuntriot shall be and is scoeptsd by the pi NUST DICIER WATI'R CoRstsvAUCT DISTRICT a r' SSTs Sy Vresi•e This contract inolude■ and is subjoct to the tettms.aaa conditiolso vt Lb. f.iiewise iaoum•ota which must ason.pany this contractf I. Rap showing location of point of diversion (taw map Pcovidad) t 2 Ap piissatioa and Data Irons fully completed and signed 1. other -s- TfITCI 0 m STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3581 FAX (303) 866-3589 August 3, 1993 S. AUG 0 5 1993. GARFIELD COUNTY Mr. Dave Michaelson Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Westbank Ranch Filing #4 PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plan Section 35, T6S and Section 2, T7S, R89W, 6th P.M. Water Division 5, Water District 38 Dear Mr. Michaelson: oy Romer Governor Ken Salazar Executive Director "'kr-11M D. Simpson State Engineer Thank you for the referral concerning the amendment to the Westbank Ranch Filing #4. The project is located approximately five miles south of Glenwood Springs along Highway 82. The change includes downsizing the project from 98 dwelling units to 67 dwelling units. In addition, instead of expanding the existing water supply, the modified plan anticipates a separate water distribution system from eight proposed wells. Out -of -priority depletions are proposed to be augmented with releases from Ruedi Reservoir. All lots will have non -evaporative septic systems. We can recommend approval for the preliminary plan only. Prior to approving a final plan for this project, the following issues must be addressed: • A court approved water supply plan must be decreed. The applicant has filed a plan for augmentation, Case 93CW104, which has not been adjudicated, yet. If the applicant wishes to be covered under the West Divide Water Conservancy District substitute water supply plan while proceeding with the Court process, the applicant must conform with the parameters of the District's plan. • The Protective Covenants should include specific language concerning the management and responsibility of the eight wells in the central water supply system; the amount of irrigated acreage each lot may have; the amount of livestock allowed per lot; and that all lots must use a non -evaporative septic system. All these conditions will be stipulated in the final decree. Because the augmentation plan is still pending, additional conditions may be imposed when the plan is decreed. Our April 13, 1993 letter to the County for the modification to Westbank Ranch Filing #4 was in response to a change from a multi -family to single family concept. The proposed water supply was from four decreed wells. Our April letter does not apply to this submittal. Should you have further questions or comments regarding our concerns for the water supply for this project, please contact me at the above address. Mr. Dave Michaelson August 3, 1993 Sincerely, • • dy T/Sappington ater esources Engineer cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer Joe Bergquist, Water Commissioner Page 2 1 STATE OF COLORADO • Roy Romer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Perry D. Olson, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 July 27, 1993 Garfield County Planning 109 8th St., Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Dave: t s Ii r'._,��7y REFER TO AIG 0 3 1993 LIAR 'FEL COUNTy OF14) For Wildlife— For People I refer you to our 4/1/93 letter to you regarding wildlife impacts to mule deer and elk by the proposed Westbank Ranch Filing #4 Resubdivision. We stand by our recommendations in that letter regarding ways to minimize those impacts In addition to those recommendations, we recommend the following: 1. If dogs are allowed, restrict to 1 dog/home. All kennels be constructed before C.O. is issued. Based upon our experience, electric fencing does not always work; a physical kennel is preferred. 2. Any rail fencing be 48", 3 -rail or less with at least 18" between 2 of the rails. The following issues did not appear to be addressed in the last submission: 1. Density was reduced; however building envelopes were not designated. We would recommend these be placed in the nearest 1/3 of each lot closest to roadways and set back from any hillside. If possible clump homesites. 2 All utilities be buried. 3. No horse/livestock grazing. If allowed, homeowner fence haystacks with 8' fencing to prevent damage to haystacks which is an attractant to big game. 4. Maintain native vegetation outside building envelope. 5. Winter kill animals and their disposal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Larry Green/Kevin Wright Division of Wildlife Managers DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL °SOURCES, Kenneth Salazar, Executive Director WILDLIFE COkbiliSl 1pN, William R. Hegberg, Member • Eldon W. Cooper, Member • Felix Chavez, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member Louis F. Swift, Secretary • George VanDenBerg, Chairman • Arnold Salazar, Member • Thomas M. Eve, Vice Chairman S i ATE -OF COLORADO Roy flamer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Perry D. Olson, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 50633 Highway 6 Glenwood Springs, April 1, 1993 Dave Michaelson Regulatory Offices and Personnel 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Westbank Ranch Filing #4 Resubdivision CO 81 6 01 REFER TO: Dear Dave: On March 26, 1993, district wildlife manager Kevin Wright and I visited Westbank Ranch Filing #4 to review the site for wildlife values. We observed about twenty live deer browsing, three carcasses of deer lost during this winter, heavy utilization of sagebrush and rabbitbrush plants by big game, heavy use of trails into and out of the area and concentrations of pellet groups along ridge tops. Division of Wildlife mapping places Westbank Ranch Filing 04 in elk winter range and in critical deer_ habitat (meaning that loss of this critical winter_ range would adversely affect deer). Development of Westbank Ranch Filing #4 will stress big game populations because of increased domestic dogs running at large, loss of native vegetation, increased erosion, increased vehicular traffic, increased human/wildlife interaction and increased obstacles to negotiate such as fencing. We would like to recommend the following methods of minimizing impacts to current wildlife occupants: 1. Reduce the density of 98 single family homesites by the use of fourplex lots, duplex lots, clumping homesites, and/or eliminating some lots or combining lots into larger lots. 2. Require underground utilities to protect raptores (birds of prey) from electrocution. (A pair of golden eagles nest very close to this development.) 3. Require fencing restrictions. No wire fences. Wood and wood rail fences a maximum height of 48 inches with a maximum of three rails (allows for fawns to pass between rails) except for solid privacy fences which should be a minimum of 72 inches. 4. No dogs allowed. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet J. Barry, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, George VanDenBerg, Chairman • Robert L. Freidenberger, Vice Chairman • William R. Hegberg, Secretary Eldon W. Cooper, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member • Dennis Luttrell, Member • Gene B. Peterson, Member • Larry M. Wright, Member • page 2 Westbank Ranch Filing #4 (continued) April 1, 1993 5. No livestock allowed on any lot. (Livestock, especially horses on small dryland lots denude native vegetation, increase erosion and increase wildlife damage to neighboring property owners from wildlifes attraction to hay fed to livestock.) 6. Restrict building of any structure to the third of each lot nearest the roadway. (This would help reduce loss of native vegetation.) 7. Require the developer to include the following information to buyers of each lot: A. These homesites are located in critical deer and elk winter range. Taller browse plants such as sagebrush, oakbrush, mountain mahogany, serviceberry and bitterbrush usually protrude through the winter snows and are important to the survival of big game. Homeowners are encouraged to maintain native vegetation. B. Deer and elk can damage or destroy ornamental plantings. For suggestions to prevent wildlife damage and types of ornamentals less susceptible to damage, contact the Colorado Division of Wildlife. C. Death is natures way of keeping wildlife in balance with the amount of remaining habitat. Wildlife mortality rates are increased by human and pet interaction with wildlife. DEER AND ELK WILL, DIE ON YOUR PROPERTY. It is the landowners responsibility to dispose of the carcass. Burial on your own property or disposal at a landfill Is acceptable. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We are available to discuss any of these issues presented above. You can contract myself or Kevin Wright at 945-7228. Sincerely, Larry L. Green District Wildlife Manager • STATE of COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Division of Minerals and Geology Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Rm. 715 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-2611 FAX (303) 866-2461 July 21, 1993 Mr. Dave Michaelson Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 44 0 'JUL 261993 09, Wt '"./oy Romer ,.1(3 4Fist"' i 6_L.1 couNryGovernor Ken Salazar Executive Director Michael B. Long Division Director Vicki Cowart State Geologist and Director Re: Westbank Ranch PUD Filing No. 4, Preliminary Plan Dear Mr. Michaelson: GA -94-0001 At your request and in accordance with S.B. 35 (1972), we have reviewed the materials submitted for and made a field inspection on July 13, 1993, of the site of the proposed residential subdivision referenced above. The following comments summarize our findings. (1) Generally, the assessment of potential geology -related problems in this subdivision presented in the analysis by CTL Thompson is thorough and adequate. Although there are some parts of the project area that have moderate to severe geologic hazards, these will be adequately avoided of the subdivision is developed as shown on the proposed plat. The lot sites are sufficiently large that a safe building site can be selected on each one although such "safe build" areas on some of the lots are relatively small, especially on lots 1 and 2 and lots 35 to 43, inclusive. (2) We strongly concur with the recommendation by CTL Thompson that each lot and building site be investigated by a qualified engineering geologist and/or soils and foundation engineer who should collaborate with the architect for proposed structure(s). Careful siting of structures, proper control of drainage, and properly designed building foundations (including their concrete specifications) will be critical to minimizing construction and maintenance problems for future homeowners in the area. (3) It is likely that maintenence costs for roads and other infrastructure in the subdivision will apt to be higher than that typical of subdivisions in more gently sloping and less hazardous terrain. The County should evaluate these costs for any facilities • 1 Mr. Dave Michaelson July 21, 1993 Page 2 that may be dedicated to it for maintenance, e.g. roads. (4) The feasibility of use of individual sewage -disposal systems on lots of this size, in terrain which is relatively steep in many places, and where bedrock is at or near the surface is highly questionable. The admission in the submitted documentation (p. 2,3) that a "replacement" leach field site should be planned for on each lot is an indication that the proponent is considering the possibility that individual septic systems will eventually fail. It is our opinion that the subdivision should be placed on a central sewer system served by its own sewage- treatment plant. Eventually, when it is economically feasible to join a larger sewer district (possibly the proposed Aspen Glen facility), this subdivision should do so. Minimizing duplicity of sewage -treatment facilities is a policy of the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division. In summary, this project is feasible, but only with careful planning down to the siting of homes on lots. Some of the project area that must be used for locations of roads, utility corridors, and other infrastructure is geologically hazardous and will necessitate higher than ordinary maintenance and repair costs. The sizes of lots and geologic conditions make the feasibility of use of individual sewage -treatment systems questionable. Sincerely, mes M. Soule ngineering Geologist • II! TAKE United States Department of the Interior A� BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Glenwood Springs Resource Area 50629 Highway 6 and 24 P.O. Box 1009 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 July 30, 1993 Mr. Dave Michaelson Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street - Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear Mr. Michaelson: MN ■ IN REPLY REFER TO:• ' 1785g 566 S 0 Jfi/ 44. We recently received two public notices regarding the PUD Preliminary Plan and a PUD zone district amendment for the resubdivision of Westbank Ranch Filing 14. After staff review we have no additional consents regarding either the zone district amendment or the preliminary plan. Please reference my letter of April 2, 1993 related to this subdivision for our comments and recommendations regarding this proposal. A copy of this letter is enclosed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jim Byers in this office at 945-2341. Sincerely, W4-4-eb g7Aci4-e, Michael S. Mottice Area Manager Enclosure i STATE OF COLORADO • ,y p 2 1993 IR TO Roy Romer, Governor ti'`; APR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 'k DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 50633 Highway 6 C�,�f if� �`1� Perry D. Olson, Director Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 6060 Broadway April COU1, 1993 Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 Dave Michaelson Regulatory Offices and Personnel 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Westbank Ranch Filing #4 Resubdivision Dear Dave: For Wildlife - For People On March 26, 1993, district wildlife manager Kevin Wright and I visited Westbank Ranch Filing #4 to review the site for wildlife values. We observed about twenty live deer browsing, three carcasses of deer lost during this winter, heavy utilization of sagebrush and rabbitbrush plants by big game, heavy use of trails into and out of the area and concentrations of pellet groups along ridge tops. Division of Wildlife mapping places Westbank Ranch Filing #4 in elk winter range and in critical deer habitat (meaning that loss of this critical winter range would adversely affect deer). - Development of Westbank Ranch Filing #4 will stress big game populations because of increased domestic dogs running at large, loss of native vegetation, increased erosion, increased vehicular traffic, increased human/wildlife interaction and increased obstacles to negotiate such as fencing. We would like to recommend the following methods of minimizing impacts to current wildlife occupants: 1. Reduce the density of 98 single family homesites by the use of fourplex lots, duplex lots, clumping homesites, and/or eliminating some lots or combining lots into larger lots. 2. Require underground utilities to protect raptores (birds of prey) from electrocution. (A pair of golden eagles nest very close to this development.) 3. Require fencing restrictions. No wire fences. Wood and wood rail fences a maximum height of 48 inches with a maximum of three rails (allows for fawns to pass between rails) except for solid privacy fences which should be a minimum of 72 inches. 4. No dogs allowed. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Kenneth Salazar, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, William R. Hegberg, Member • Eldon W. Cooper, Member • Felix Chavez, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member Louis F. Swift, Secretary • George VanDenBerg, Chairman • Arnold Salazar, Member • Thomas M. Eve, Vice Chairman • • page 2 Westbank Ranch Failing #4 (continued) April 1, 1993 5. No livestock allowed on any lot. (Livestock, especially horses on small dryland lots denude native vegetation, increase erosion and increase wildlife damage to neighboring property owners from wildlifes attraction to hay fed to livestock.) 6. Restrict building of any structure to the third of each lot nearest the roadway. (This would help reduce loss of native vegetation.) 7. Require the developer to include the following information to buyers of each lot: A. These homesites are located in critical deer and elk winter range. Taller browse plants such as sagebrush, oakbrush, mountain mahogany, serviceberry and bitterbrush usually protrude through the winter snows and are important to the survival of big game. Homeowners are encouraged to maintain native vegetation. B. Deer and elk can damage or destroy ornamental plantings. For suggestions to prevent wildlife damage and types of ornamentals less susceptible to damage, contact the Colorado Division of Wildlife. C. Death is natures way of keeping wildlife in balance with the amount of remaining habitat. Wildlife mortality rates are increased by human and pet interaction with wildlife. DEER AND ELK WILL DIE ON YOUR PROPERTY. It is the landowners responsibility to dispose of the carcass. Burial on your own property or disposal at a landfill is acceptable. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We are available to discuss any of these issues presented above. You can contact myself or Kevin Wright at 945-7228. Sincerely, JL�4..-f2-e, Larry L. Green District Wildlife Manager • • TAKE PRIDE IN', United States Department of the Interior Ani BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Glenwood Springs Resource Area 50629 Highway 6 and 24 P.O. Box 1009 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 April 2, 1993 Mr. Dave Michaelson Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street - Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear Mr. Michaelson: MO t a 1 aa� 1 _�g I (7-880)'1 APR 051993 4) ARFJ LL COUNTY ■ In response to the request for comments regarding the proposed Westbank Ranch P.U.D.-Filing #4 Subdivision, I offer the following statements for your scheduled April 5, 1993, Planning Commission hearing. Proposed lot 91 is the only parcel adjacentto public land. 1. The landowners should be aware of the location of property boundaries to ensure no encroachment occurs on public land. Should fence construction be considered along the BLM boundary, the fence standards should allow for easy passage by big game, i.e. less than 42" in height with a 10" kick space between the top 2 wires. 2. The parcel of BLM administered land adjacent to lot 91 has been designated as a disposal tract in the BLM's Resource Management Plan. Current or future owners of this lot 91 should not expect the BLM tract to remain in federal ownership. 3. Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company is proposing to construct a pipeline near or within the 100 foot Public Service Company utility easement depicted on the sketch plan. Any utilities proposed for the subdivision that cross public land would have to obtain a right-of-way from this office. 4. The adjacent public land is not allotted for livestock grazing. 5. Adjacent public land is open to hunting. The proponent should be aware that such recreation uses are allowed on BLM-administered land. 6. After review of our mineral survey notes, there are no federal minerals located within the subject private lands. 7. Development of this nature, especially at the density proposed, would likely render the critical winter mule deer habitat (which is in relatively poor condition) unsuitable for deer use. The development could increase deer use on adjoining public and private lands particularly during the winter months. • • Garfield Planning - Page 2 8. The soils within the proposed subdivision are poorly suited for housing development due to shallow depth to bedrock, steep slopes, and very high hazard of water erosion. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jim Byers in this office at 945-2341. Sincerely, Au)(Mylt- GA h ,b - Michael S. Mottice Area Manager • 661§ Oa/gr./Au/ .A,Itoi.ie act., July 7, 1993 Tom Zancanella JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 113 9th Street, Suite 214 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602-1458 RE: Westbank Development Co. Filing IV Dear Tom: Please be advised that on or about April 28, 1993 an Augmentation Plan was filed for Westbank Ranch Filing IV and an Amended Application for Approval for Augmentation was subsequently filed on May 7, 1993. The amended Application was advertised by the resume procedure. The advertising period for that Plan has passed and as of this date no opposition has been entered in the case. Amendment of that application may be considered. however, it is anticipated that Westbank Ranch No. 1 Ltd. will achieve a final order of the Court approving said Application for Approval of Augmentation. Further. an application for exchange contract was made to the West Divide Water Conservancy District on or about May 14, 1993. On or about May 20, 1993, West Divide approved and issued Westbank Development Company's exchange contract. The West Divide contract is for 40 acre feet. an adequate amount of water to proceed under the currently proposed plan. Kindest regards, 7 Billie G. Burchf/eld BGB/bay CC: John Huebinger File Cron 2800 ✓yea ,/tvenue, fat& 107 64 do 0, &kwwood 4bel4 061 81601 Jur A/rletio cfc, S i ma/ eenter 9e /zone. • (84946-8818 (610,V 946-d'967" OMan President (303) 076-2021 Kelly Corey 4745 C. R. 315 Silt, Colorado.61652 Vice -President Joe Mautz, Jr. 6107 Highway 133 Carbondale, Colo. 81623 Ser-retary/Kater Manager Russell George, Attorney Stuver 6 George P.C. Post Office Box 907 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Treasurer LaVerne Sterbuck 1859 C. R. 344 Silt, Colorado 81652 • • West Divide Water Conservancy District POST OFFICE 130X 1478 RIFLE, COLORADO 81050.1478 June 10, 1993 John Huebin dr, Jr., President Westbank Dielopment Co. Inc. 0235 Oak ane Glenwoo Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Huebinger: Enclosed is your approved contract No. 930428WBR. Copies of your contract have been or are being submitted following entities: The State Division of Water Resources Division No. 5 Water Resources The Colorado River Water Conservation District The Garfield County Department of Planning Division No. 45 Water Resources West Divide's Attorney and Engineer Sincerely yours, Janet Maddock, secretary to Russell George, secretary/water manager Uoard of Dirwton Holly Couey 4745 C.. R. .315 Silt, Colorado 81652. Joe tMutz, Jr. 6107 highway 133 Carbondale, Colo. 81623 Gregory Durrett 926 Blake Avenue Glenwood Spgs., Co 8160) LaVerno Startxuk 1059 C. R. 344 Silt, Colorado 81652 Carl H. I3e.rnklau 7800 C. R. 309 Rifle, Colorado 01650 to the cc The State Division of Water Resources w/contract Division No. 5 Water Resources w/contract The Colorado River Water Conservation District w/contract /The Garfield County Department of Planning w/contract Division No. 45 Water Resources Ed Currier, Engineer w/contract Russell George, Attorney w/contract Billie G. Burchfield, Esq. w/contract • • cam= = raruaz Sf C L 2 ` > (k) D MAP Y.D. MT4ECR„ O i 3 DATE ACPIVMIID 5 For office U 3 only APPLICATION AND DATA FORM TO LEASE WATER FROM WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT A. APPLICANT Westbank Ranch No. 1 Ltd. Name Address 02 Telephone Number Authorized Agent 2800 Midland Avenue, • .. Glenw ... S ri •I 303 /945- - 6190 or Representative Glenwood Springs, CQ 81601 Billie G. Burchfield B. WATER RIGHT OWNED BY APPLICANT Name of Right Westbank Ranch Filing IV Wells 1-8 Type of Structure or Right Wells Location of Point of Diversion See Attached rylya /Ip//iLfrr 76N foR 40/ 4 149 /() IA /77 E./7/72977 Water Court Case No. 93 CW 104 Well Permit No. To be applied for C. INTENDED USE OF LEASED WATER esti Location of Area of Use c and irrigation of 5.74 acres located in T6 S,R 89W,6th PM, Section 35 find T 7.s _R 89 6th PM, Section2 Desc�on of Use Domestic irrigation, inci.ental s orage and fire protection Number of Dwelling Units 100 Total Acreage 5.74 Proposed Potable Water System lJFz k_)/LL ALL 'LJL T/a2LS • Proposed Waste -Water Treatment System septics Projected Monthly Volume of Leased Water Needed in Gaa Jan .6/7} 000 Feb. 5�/oOo Mar .PZ Doo Apr 410,DGQ May/,665, 00O June, jaztz(X7 July � R6V Doo Aug .1 i/17,0aSept .4,z ct •, 04,20 Nov.6[b,00' Dec. 6/9:600 Annual Total Gallons /2, 90/, 000 Acre Feet, `r r? Maximum Instantaneous Demand 112.5 gpm i1 I D. OTHER REMARKS ./477/?e /Ii ,4 if7i iD/v FU' AW -2 !i 1/2 L. F-4� A,a r_ .n .n/7 -7,;z 77 n� DATE SIGNKIIJRE OFA Na. QR '111"0410 AT VE • • Contract 1 q-304- (- (.9.i R - Map ID 1 Date Act vate 5 - dQ -ct WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Water Allotment Contract Name of Applicant: Westbank Ranch No. 1 Ltd.. Quantity of water in acre feet 40 Applicant, hereby applies to the West Divide water Conservancy District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of C.R.S. 1973, 37-45-101, et seq.f (hereinafter referred to as the "District") for an allotment contract to beneficially and perpetually use water or water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution of this application, and subsequent delivery and use of water, Applicant hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions: 1. Water Rights: Applicant shall own water rights at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to divert water, which will be supplemented by water leased herein. If Applicant intends to divert through a well, it must be understood by Applicant that no right to divert exists until a valid well permit is obtained from the State Engineer. 2. Quantity: Water applied for by the Applicant in the amount set forth above shall be diverted at Applicant's point of diversion from the District's direct flow water rights, and when water is unavailable for diversion pursuant to administration by the Colorado State Engineer during periods when said direct flow water right is not in priority, the District shall release for the use of Applicant up to said quantity in acre-feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by the District. It is understood that any quantity allotted from direct flow, storage or otherwise, to the Applicant by the District will be limited by the priority of the District's decrees and by the physical and legal availability of water from District's sources. Any quantity allotted will only be provided so long as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the terms and conditions of this contract. The District and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, and the ability of the District to allot direct flow rights to the Applicant may be dependent on the consent of the Colorado River Water Conservation District. If at any time the Applicant determines it requires leas water than the amount herein provided, it may so notify the District in writing, and the amount of water allotted under this contract shall be reduced permanently in accordance with such notice. Rates shall be adjusted accordingly in following water years only. 3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial Use: Any and all water allotted Applicant by the District shall be used for the following beneficial use or uses: Municipal, domestic and related uses, or irrigation and commercial (except to the extent that Ruedi water may not be available for irrigation and commercial as those terms are defined on page 5 of Contract No. 2-07-70-W0547 between the United States and the West Divide Water Conservancy District). Applicant's beneficial use of any and all water allotted shall be within or'through facilities or upon land owned, leased, operated,. Qr under Applicant's control. 4. Decrees and Delivery: Exchange releases made by the District out of storage from Ruedi Reservoir, or other works or facilities of the District, or from other sources available to the District, shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facilities or at the decreed point of -1- • • diversion for said other sources, and release or delivery of water at such outlets or points shall constitute performance of the District's total obligation. Delivery of water by the District from Ruedi Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities available to District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby expressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end of each water year (December 31), shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water. Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right, and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado State Engineer to estimate any conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate point, and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case. The District, or anyone using the District's decrees, may call on any additional sources of supply that may be available at an alternate point of diversion, (though not at the original point of diversion) only as against water rights which are junior to the date of application for the alternate point of diversion. 5. Alternate Point of Diversion and Plan of Augmentation: Decrees for alternate points of diversion of the District's water rights or storage water may be required in order for Applicant to use the water service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining such decree is the exclusive responsibility of Applicant. The district reserves the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judicial approval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to serve Applicant's facilities or lands. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the procedures and legal and engineering costs necessary for any changes in water rights contemplated herein and further agrees to indemnify the District from any costs or losses related thereto. Applicant is solely responsible for providing works and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver them to Applicant's intended beneficial use. Irrespective of the amount of water actually transferred to the Applicant's point of diversion, the Applicant shall make annual payments to the District based upon the amount of water allotted under this agreement. In the event the Applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion and to develop an augmentation plan and institute legal proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted to Applicant hereunder, the Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates its own augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to pay any amount under paragraph 18 below. In any event, the District shall have the right to approve or disapprove the Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the water court in the adjudication thereof. 6. Annual Payment: Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District at a per acre-foot rate. The initial annual payment shall be made, in full, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment -2- Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the District at a per acre-foot rate, The initial annual payment shall be made, in full, within thirty (30) days alter the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of and twater e pridelivery year to which the initial payment shall applyear is applicable to that year. Annual payments for oneach orbeyear thereafter shall be due and payable by the App each January 1. If an annual payment is not made e by the cdutoate, written notice thereof will be sent by Applicant at such address as may be designated by the Applicant in writing. (If no address has been so designated in writing, then said notice shall be sent to Applicant's address set forth herein. Water use for any part of a water year shall require payment for the entire water year. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to prevent the District from adjusting the annual rate in its sole discretion for future years only. If payment is not made within ten (10) days after the date of said written notice, Applicant shall at District's sole option have no further right, title or interest be inmediatr hiy is contract without further notice and deliverymay curtailed; and the allotment of water, as herein made, may be transferred, leased,seoo o rotherwise disposed of at the discretion of the Board of Directors 7, Security: As security to the District, the foregoing covenant of annual payments in advance of water delivery, will be fully met by annual budget and appropriation of funds from such sources of revenues as may be legally available to the Applicant. As additional security to the District, the Applicant will hold harmless the District and any person, corporation, quasi -governmental entity, or other governmental entity, for discontinuance in8ervice herein ue to the fai l r ed e fon he e Applicant to maintain the payments current basis. Applicant agrees to defray any ,out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the District in connection with thed the otallotmentsof water er rights hereunder, including, water reiburem legal and engineering costs Incurred in connection with any rights and adjudication necessary to allow Applicant's use of such allotted water rights. 8. Assi nments This agreement shall inure to the benefit of the e rs, successors or assigns of the parties hereto, except that no assignment shall be permitted in the event the water right allotted hereunder is to be used for the benefit of land which will be subdivided or otherwise held or owned in separate ownership interests by two (2) or more users of the water right allotted hereunder. In no event shall the owner of a portion, but less than all, of the Applicant's property to be served under this contract, have any rights hereunder. Any assignment of the Applicant's rights under this cont ectst shall tbe subject to, and must comply with, such req uireDistrict may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of contract rights and the assumption of contract obligations by assignees and successors. Nothing herein shall prevent successors theDtotaipcortion of Applicant's property from applying individual and separate allotment contracts. 9. Other: Rules: Applicant shall be bound by the provisions of EiFtrater conservancy, Act of Colorado! by the ruall les and regulations of the Board of Directors of the eaDis r ct; and ll amendments thereof and supe applicable law. 10. Operation and Maintenance Agreements Applicant shall enter into an 'Operation and Maintenance Agreement* with the District under terms and conditions determined by the Board of Directors of the District, if and when, the Board of said District -3- • determines in its sole discretion that such an agreement is required. Said agreement may contain, but shall not be limited to, provisions for additional annual monetary consideration for extension of District delivery services and for additional administration, operation, and maintenance costsi or for other costa to the District which may arise through services made available to the Applicant. 11. Chance of Use: The District reserve the a lu ive right to review, reapprove or disapprove any proposed use of the water allotted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotteprior Districtdshall bed without bet' aematerialwritten bre ch ofapproval thisco tract. 12. Use and Place of Use: Applicant agrees to use the water in the manner and on the property described in the documents submitted to the District at the time this agreementisrexecuted ed (said documents are incorporated herein by this thereto), or in any operation and maintenance agreement provided by Applicant. Any use other than as set forth thereon or any lease or sale of the water or water rights herein, other than as permitted in paragraph 8 above, shall be deemed to be a material breach of this agreement. 13. Title: It is understood and deed that nothing ng herein shall be interpreted to give the Applicant anlegal fee title interest in or to any water or water rights referred to herein. 14. Conservation: Applicant shall use commonly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water aand water rights herein,' and hereby agreestDistrict to be and use oy conservation plan adopted hereafter by the District owned or controlled water or water rights. 15.Restrictionsr Applicant shall restrict uses as follows (unless spec r c wa vers are appended to this agreement). Violation of these restrictions shall be deemed to be a material broach od.rhla agrosmanth Use Annual Maximum Diversion 1/3 acre foot 1 - 3 acre feet 1 acre foot/100 head 2 - 3 acro feet/acre Household Domestic (includes lawn) Livestock (cattle) Irrigation 16. Well Permit: If Applicant intends to• divert through a well,—then Applicant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's' valid well permit before District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder. 17. 1.5_11_211....-,—.°r10: tatBy executing this agreement, Applicant agrees that he not relying on any legal or engineering advice that he may believe he has received from the District. Applicant further acknowledges that he has obtained all necessary e Dist and engiplicantadvice therfrom acknowledgessources that other the than the District. APP District makes no guarantees, warranties,. or assurances whatsoever about the quantity or quality of water available pursuant to this agreement. Should the District be unable to provide the'water contracted for A e licant obtain a may from thed District. against the District, nor mayy PP 18. Costs of Water Court pci1 n. Appouldnths ies str herein in a water court filing District, n itown disc a •n, c oo a for alternate point of diversion h or plan of augmentation, then Applicant hereby agrees to pay to the District, when assessed, an additional fee representing the District's actual and reasonable coats and fees for Applicant's share of the proceeding. -4- • 1 19. Binding Agreement: This Agreement shall not be complete nor binding upon the District unless attached hereto is the form entitled "Application for Purchase of Waters from the West Divide Water Conservancy District" fully completed by Applicant and approved by the District's engineer. Said attachments shall by this reference thereto be incorporated into the terms of this agreement. 20. Warning: IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN A VALID WELL PERMIT OR OTHER WATER RIGHT IN ORDER TO DIVERT WATER, INCLUDING THE WATER ACQUIRED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. IT IS THE CONTINUING DUTY OF THE APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THE VALIDITY OF THE WELL PERMIT OR WATER RIGHT INCLUDING FILING FOR EXTENSIONS OF PERMITS, FILING WELL COMPLETION REPORTS, FILING STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIAL USE, OR OTHERWISE LAWFULLY APPLYING THE WATER TO BENEFICIAL USE ON A REGULAR BASIS WITHOUT WASTE. WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1, Ltd. (APPC: WESTBANK DEVELOPMENT CO. { INC. A Colorado Limited Partnership l \, Gene71n ging .Ptnez DY John NTeA is � Jr.,( A Prr�si nt es.tr ank UeyeIopment Co . , Inc. 0235 Oak Lane Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me_on his S— day of Ct',�bQ.h.L-- , 19 , by 'J. hn Nuebi jf �', Jr'. • Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: auc tc6t )1) 1'93 -t4.- Notary public ORDER After a hearing by the Board of Directors of the West Divide Water Conservancy District on the above application, it is hereby ORDERED that said application be granted and this contract shall be and is accepted by the District. J A TEST: f .f ecretary WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT By Pres dent `7 Date This contract includes and is subject to the terms.and conditions of the following documents which must accompany this contract: 1. Map showing location of point of diversion (use map provided:) 2. Application and Data Form fully completed and signed 3. Other -5- 1 POTENTIAL WELL LOCATIo►J AREA R88W T7S DISTRICT COURT,•TER DIVISION 5, COLORADO CABS NO, 93CW104 ====a -=====mama:==== C(�U�J AMENDED APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL FOR AUGMENTATION ==== = = = ======== a a a== as CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF: WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1 LTD., A Colorado limited partnership. ===== a s as a= a= a a a a a==== n=== a a= a=== a=========================a======= 1. The name of the applicant is Westbank Ranch No. 1 Ltd., a Colorado limited partnership, whose address is 0235 Oak Lane, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601, telephone (303) 945-6190. Attorney for applicant is Billie G. Burchfield, 2800 Midland Avenue, Suite 107 B/C, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601, (303) 945-8818. PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION 2. (a) West Bank Ranch Filing IV Well Nos. 1 through 8. Each of the wells will be located in any one or more of the following 1/4 1/4 sections: (T 6 S, R 89 W, 6th PM, Section 35/- SE1/4 SE1/4; SW1/4 SE1/4; SE1/4 SW1/4; and SW1/4 SW1/4. T 7 S, R 89 W, 6th PM, Section 1 - SW1/4 NW1/4; NW1/4 T 7 S, R 89 W, 6th PM, Section 2 - NE1/4 NE1/4; NW1/4 NE1/4; SW1/4 NE1/4; SE1/4 NE1/4; NE1/4 SE1/4; NW1/4 SE1/4; NE1/4 NW1/4; SE1/4 NW1/4. Note all 3 sections described are irregular sections. Before utilizing wells, applicant will apply for proper well permits and state engineer's office shall evaluate pursuant to C.R.S. 30-90-137 (1) and (2). SW1/4. (b) The Applicant will divert up to a total of 0.25 cfs (112.5/gpm) from any one or more, or a combination of, the above described wells. The use of said 0.25 cfs will be for domestic, irrigation, to include incidental storage and fire protection. (c) Westbank Ranch P.U.D. Filing IV, will consist of 100 single family units with an average of 2,500 square feet of home lawns and gardens each. Applicant's engineer has determined that each dwelling will use 400 gpd for domestic purposes and the consumptive use will be 50% due to soil conditions and the proximity of th•.U.D. to the Roaring Fo. River. The engineer has also determined that the consumptive use of the irrigated areas will be 2.34 AF/A. However, again due to the soil conditions and the proximity of the P.U.D. to the Roaring Fork River together with an expected application rate of 4.0 AF/A, a consumptive use of 3.0 AF/A will be augmented. Therefore, the total annual consumptive use for domestic purposes is calculated to be 22.40 AF/yr and the total annual consumptive use for irrigation (5.74 acres) purposes is 17.22 AF/yr. Said total annual 39.62 AF will be made available from the augmentation source. 3. Source of augmentation is Ruedi Reservoir whose source is the Fryingpan River and its tributaries. Ruedi Reservoir is an on Channel Reservoir located in the NW1/4 NE1/4 of Sec. 18, T. 8 S, R 84 W, of the 6th P.M. Ruedi Reservoir was originally decreed for 140,697.3 acre feet in Civil Action No. 4613, Garfield County District Court on June. 20, 1958, with an appropriation date of July 29, 1957, for hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, municipal, domestic, industrial, piscatorial, and stock watering uses. Subsequently, in Case No. W-789-76, Water Division No. 5,the amount of water decreed to Ruedi Reservoir was reduced from 140,697.3 acre feet to 101,369 acre feet. Applicant has or soon will have a water allotment contract with Ruedi Reservoir for 40 AF for domestic, irrigation, incidental storage and fire protection purposes. The Applicant herein requests approval for the plan above described in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above for augmentation. RESPECTFULLY submitted this 7TH day of May, 1993. Billie G. Burchfiel•,#1.3 Attorney for Appli•'.nt 2800 Midland Ave., Suite 107 B/C Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (303) 945-2361 • • STATE OF COLORADO SS COUNTY OF GARFIELD I, John Huebinger Jr., state under oath that I have read this application and verify its content. WESTBANK RANCH NO. 1, LTD A Colorado Limited Partnership By: WESTBANK DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. General Managing Partner ^ ,--, -1.-- - - - ---- . - - ' ,...- -,.' •"" : ". N - . ••••• ; /- ''' TT E S 7-: N.• / -', .. ... Aar "I d , .. P: ',,,,.,_•—•Dblores J f uebinger, Secr :;•, a.ry Westbank Development Co., rnc. q. . !,- Jo'n Huebinger, Jr., Yre ident stbank Development Co., Inc. C:\WP51\Westb3.app "Firr.M1rArarigiTTITI:177717r77,17 .1"..7`':','"'77.17".. 7"177.7727.T.r"L',* WATER RES. TEL :303-866-3589 Hug 03i3 10:16 PJ0.002 P.01 • STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1 31 3 Sherman Street, ROom 1318 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 8b6-35131 FAX (303) 866.3589 FAX COVER SHEET PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: TO: OFFICE: FROM: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: DATE: Rny 'Omer Governor Ken Salazar Exectakc Director til D Simpson Stale Engineer IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES AS INDICATED OR QUALITY IS UNACCEPTABLE, PLEASE CALL US BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Telephone: (303) 866-3581 Fax Number: (303) 866-3589 MESSAGE:moi ( fl_� /3"2-01;41 PJB WATER RES. TEL:303-866-3589 Aug 03 93 1U:17 No.002 P.02 • • STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1311 Sherman Street, Rimm 818 Denver, CMIQIa& 8t)203 Phrme (303) 1366-35b1 FAX (303) 866-3S11') August 3, 1993 Mr. Dave Michaelson Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Westbank Ranch Filing #4 PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plan Section 35, T6S and Section 2, T7S, R89W, 6th P.M. Water Division 5, Water District 38 Dear Mr. Michaelson: * j Roy ROM!, iiuvcrnor Kin Salazar E.,eccitivc D( erlc r sial 1). Simpson State I riginccr Thank you for the referral concerning the amendment to the Westbank Ranch Piling #4. The project is located approximately five miles south of Glenwood Springs along Highway 82, The change includes downsizing the project from 98 dwelling units to 67 dwelling units. In addition, instead of expanding the existing water supply, the modified plan anticipates a separate water distribution system from eight proposed wells. Out -of -priority depletions are proposed to be augmented with releases from Ruedi Reservoir. All lots will have non -evaporative septic systems. We can recommend approval for the preliminary plan only. Prior to approving a final plan for this project, the following issues must be addressed: • A court approved water supply plan must be decreed. The applicant has filed a plan for augmentation, Case 93CW104, which has not been adjudicated, yet. If the applicant wishes to be covered under the West Divide Water Conservancy District substitute water supply plan while proceeding with the Court process, the applicant must conform with the parameters of the District's plan. • The Protective Covenants should include specific language concerning the management and responsibility of the eight wells in the central water supply system; the amount of in-igated acreage each lot may have; the amount of livestock allowed per lot; and that all lots must use a non -evaporative septic system. All these conditions will be stipulated in the final decree. Because the augmentation plan is still pending, additional conditions may be imposed when the plan is decreed. Our April 13, 1993 letter to the County for the modification to Westbank Ranch Filing #4 was in response to a change from a multi -family to single family concept. The proposed water supply was from four decreed wells, Our April letter does not apply to this submittal. Should you have further questions or conunents regarding our concerns for the water supply for this project, please contact me at the above address. WATER REB . Mr. Dave Michaelson August 3, 1993 Sincerely, TEL:303-866-3589 Rug 03 93 10:1T No.002 P.03 dy TJ Sappington ater csources Engineer • • cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer Joe Bergquist, Water Commissioner Page 2 00/09/J::, 16:2 U e ioU r Yu k`teli'..L.z.. i Ll-., • Ralph T. and Marguerite T. Tones 6202 Maiden Lane, L'et't.es,:ia, 1,d 20817 Augti t 6, 1993 Jerome Gamba Assoc., Inc. P.O.Box 1458 Glenwood Springs, CO 87.602 Dear Firs: As owners of the property located. at 0479 Westbanr Rid., LoJ. °, W'e•sttank Ranch, riling No.2) we are wr:t;.ng to express our strr:ns -,;,7)itiern to ,_ x nk -4n,!:4..# [ LTL's application to allow a. ^tlu zone ui l,r 1.Lt 4-mendlnent subdivision of Westbank Ranch ryili.rig 44. Thin application is unacceptable for the following reauons 1t was our very clear understanding that. the area .lire,:tly to tht:r of our property w1 not to be deve]nprd. Development should not be permitted, not just to preserve a commitment, hest to pre,,eve ever diminishing wildlt e habitat. south. -- The petitioner has requested l'*.r:,ti.ssion to install septic, tanks in the the area proposed for de=velopment, Given the obvious rra.-.n=:J,, patterns, this proposal directly threatens the health of nose rP:1ldin6 on OUT property, but all of those ]oe.atcd near to us on th,c :south side r.`. We':thank Rd, This, aspect alone *should be auffici n.t: to deny a.rprc,:.. -- Disruption of the drainage pa`;trn.. in lots 62 & f3 directly to the south of ovr property would pose a serious threat to the stability of our house, which hae already required more than ,£30,000 worth of r, tahili2atio.I: wgrk Disruption of the uwitable olope behind our property, combi.n.eei with removal of the natural vegetation would. inevitably further undermine the foundations of the house on cur property, and threaten thn'=e of ci.x neighbors. w- ogib of the area proposed t;,,- dr_vclupnlent on steep sloping, unstable woi1 which is 'unsu.tab)e for. construction. Euilding therc would endanger adjacent properties located. below whkh are constructed nn prerfe t1y suitable Bites. To Bum. up, as property owners in the area d,irectl y affected by this application for development we urge in this .trongest: term:- the: this application he dented. ��6 73u MfA- /1-% z free,z7 lete 6(..-eof40" / If (y.,e&t. o&tiZe "t-ei *(frCe. /ea.eta- of 7,6 -ea )20-1-%-4( „�,' - Gia ,v frt, vvt, �'.O s 2e-10e4t-- f -t;4014 i7e-re-r-vC_Zeof max. �c � m4-erec. e40 i4e*, Ate itae -06( 4a, xce; 1-74c492.f.t._ Ste 3 • - a -u -70 "Zece 7.Cce 7.Cce Gt'trc4-P•o lt/K.4,e-C,ArM .etsZ%�c-CL-, /"'4--d`of C4AtAferr, /&e 4f,per-04-7 /Gei-r.tze,r,e.ote, 6°Stt- 40`e -f -t /vw /Acce;r40-7:te Zitt frr, At -fee • At- f-er"te /, r'// GfAh4,- • &OM. / ,y�/G �. i0e7ev`' 40cGrtiuv �u06e-alc A-e-r`t-e 1" `� , s%/6. „7/ '7/5-- .277r 00,--0* J:i lb: 2.J ga'iiv tt°iG Jerome GFamba Assoc., Inc. N.O.l;ox l.4`S8 Glenwood Springs, CO 69.602 Dear Sirs: L;.. ! L.'--.--- • Ralph T. orad Marguerite T. Tones e202 Maiden Lazne, Let•h' ii, N}.d 20817 A.ugu•at ra, 1993 As owners of the property located at 0470 Westbank R;a Ranch, Filing No.) we anL... writing to express our ti rr� 'i 1 ,itian to ._ 11 11D zone i.�'.r i4;.1. a,mend.mc?nt _�1E�,tba.rak.-c�an,.ra 1f ;C LTD's application to allow e. T'.�.� fdr the resubdivision of Westbank Ranch T,A.ing d4. Thin ,application is unacceptable for the following rc�i ons It our very clear understanding that the area iireotly to th,, south, of our property wa1 itot to be deve oprd. Development shn„ld not ;:'e permitted, not ;u' t. to pr,:rserve a commitment, but to preser7e river" diminishing wtld.i.te habitat. -- The petitioner has requested permission to install septic tanker in the the :area proposed for development. Given. tb' obvious ",rn ge pattern-., this proposal directly threatens the health of those rc':;4di.rx un our property, but all of those located. i,e;]r to us on. the nowt!. stie r,f We',tbank Rd. This aspect alone tshouir_i. be suffici,?wits to deny abprr•:ra:. -- Disruption of tl,e drainage patt�rn5 in lots 62 & 63 directly to the south of n.ir property would pose a sserious threat to the stability of our house, which. has already required more than. '•10,000 worth of -,tabili2:s.tion work. Disruption of the unstable clape behind our property, combined with removal of the natural vegetation would. inevitably further undermine the foundations of. the house nn c'ur property, and threa.te!1 thoTe of '.:r^ neighbors. -- Tot Oh of to area proposed for d.r_vcliJpniznt i s on steep loping, unstable wail which is unsuitable for construction. Building th,,rr would endanger adjacent properties located. below which are constructed nn perfectly suitable sites, To sum up, as property owners in the area d.i.rectiy affected by this application for development we urge is tl:,i.s eArongest term:-, the% this application be denir+d, /uerlte T. Sones • • August 14, 1993 Mr. John Huebinger 0235 Oak Lane Glenwood Springs, Co. 81611 As concerned homeowners of Westbank Filings 1, 2 & 3, we the undersigned respectfully request that since Westbank Filing 4 will automatically become a member of our Association, that we be assured in writing that the Covenants and Building Restrictions for Filing 4 shall be in accordance with Filings 1, 2 & 3. Since our By-laws state Filing 4 would be allowed to join our Association, and since Filings 1, 2 & 3 all abide by the same covenants, we feel that Filing 4 should conform to our covenants also. In Tight of any future concerns of their's will affect Filings 1, 2 & 3 as well. If you do not plan on imposing these covenants, we would request that your future subdivision be named something other than Westbank, Filing 4, and create a separate entity subdivision since they will be using PUD Regulations instead of our Regulations. • Property Owner • Address Lot & Filing ozr3 z(7_3 z(L7c,L,,i ,t),7 dJe3 ,-0A+., 020 y /tO n3 n /r%q Jja D(7 3/) ,!./ atif-LA e a Ro-Lt X -AL / 43, `��.c--a/(--< o (/39 csOP - 3 3 O37c 7 7 lert CIO( c) L of 23 - 3 2 -3 g( -/ /WI 1 3 5�,(3 �,1 L 0! 70 �wUu of , Jai, h, ter,//.(9//9ktr,407��� • Property Owner Address • CZ % ZiA15Z6P-it /C-! .12 0D gq tAA2,0 • (2z,t, &fr.' Lot & Filing 2 / / D GS-\ b G .IL-ps DZ% 11/VA" e 0'?? C'4)Y w Ay pn e d v a'7 fa Q, 4e2 -7`-e-- /1i ' /4..10,"1---'0&4S (11.9i*A-LP) 1./V G/SC c ,42cZ 27,a? 61tern' ) 5 C 2 7) ti. -w' :2 w • tItY 3 0C9/ ko.4.141f„,/ 00 VI ArvP frb Property Owner Address Lot & Filing • County Commissioners, Garfield County Courthouse, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Gentlemen: August 1993 Re: PUD Zone District Amendment for Resubdivision of Westbank Ranch Filing 4 ,o' As homeowners in Westbank Ranch Filings 1, 2 and 3 we request that the PUD Zone District Amendment for Westbank Ranch Filing 4 be either amended or denied. Please consider the following points. for denial. SEPTIC TANKS The proposed amendment to Westbank Ranch Filing 4 to allow Independent Septic Systems causes great concern. Because of the instability of the soil, and unstable slopes this opens up myriad problems with drainage and runoff.. The record of septic tank malfunction caused by tanks shifting can be traced, and this threat of contamination warrants further investigation. DRAINAGE While this PUD has many merits, we wish to concentrate on those lots 52 through 63 located on the lower bench. The impact on already unstable slopes and increased surface area from streets, culverts etc. greatly increases the flash flood threat. The density and location of homesites in this area of Filing 4 threatens to interfere with the natural catchment area in that flash flood plain. The offer to include a "catchment pond', at the base of the proposed road does not provide a solution for all those established homes who depend on that area for protection from flash flood. Historical flows have produced runoff of up to 6 inches through established properties, down to the Robinson Ditch. Flooding from this runoff in 1985 caused both water and structural damage to many homes in Filings 1 and 2. POSSIBLE ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS 1. Eliminate the Old Native Lane cul de sac, and combine the Tots to provide an acceptable building envelope in the one-third of the lot closest to the developed road (Heubinger Drive). 2. Replat lots 60 and 61 to be accessible off Heubinger Drive. 3. Dedicate lots 62 and 63 to open space to preserve the flood plain and catchment area. 4. As the jurisdiction of the City of Glenwood Springs sewer system extends only as far as the southerly boundary lines of Filings 1, 2 and 3 - then the developer should • • be required to comply with the original approval for a central sewage disposal system. If these acceptable solutions can not be met under the proposed PUD, then as homeowners who would be adversely impacted by development of those Tots in the lower bench of Westbank Ranch Filing 4, we must request that the County Commissioners consider our request for denial of this PUD based on Garfield County code 4.12.03 Sec 2. Property Owner • lit ce_ • Address 7zc3-4/e,W ///).4,4,I i/e Lot & Filing 0)-03 tAJDs r RAD) P, () &5' taJfa /q/ 4- L/( <?439 44 031? 7 Mfea drr& L� E) 31_� is1 0/7/ �� 0 5"'2-�,:, P,k D35z i4)edLL e //Ai r,;' OHO JaviAirel a. 3 3 —3 solid �� y Property Owner Address 0,2 K26-11 51)99 wo44iL2-L j U C) e �✓h,�u say'-0��.1 �" ` Lot & Filing 6 ff� 3 / G O `? / ►XPi, c r,. -r , , �-ii _3 .6.) 3 q rOP-ALA/vr\ CSL ) ylze 3--L,) -- - -- 0 Z Z `f T $ 44'1 lk Q () 002 e CO,9 ratiala5 Lade, Q a,t vliut u Ati t) a Q. e e „?. 7A/ -h• qd,e-. Vo / a-(riv4y L» 2 6o3y o3'L LL G i) �d _ pt.0 life/d k/% (l'? 3 0 S 2 2— 24v f e/ir/q.<3 o 0011 `��.. u •2 Property Owner Address ,/d-a9.rY • °I'7> Th r<n O��o/ tic4.k Lot & Filing Property Owner Address Ge -Z, &7C)/ /61 -S71/5"( nO\ 1)C)1A1A* 7 '63 Ld Lot & Filing / '7o ,!4;7 / 7 - 2_ , 05 a-3 1,c2e4. /7 - 2_ s--ex_/d. / - 6 ( L 0 ght 3 -W/&I2 C-ut 4"o•tL UR :N. MMM 12 MZ est tORiE0�� 31�+ MILOREO 011.$11001t, COUNT, CUR* OE R 1�iG'!7, AGREEMENT, OPTtON TO PURCHASE REAL ESTATE ANfl RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL ani 825tiefiln This agreement entered into this JP day of March, 1992, and between Westbank Ranch No. 1, Lt. , a Limited Partnership hetein after called "Westhank" and Joe Zanin, herein after called "Zanin", it is herein agreed by the pettiest 1. The Nutlet' acknowledge that Westbank has contemporaneously with the execution of this agreement borrowed the sum of $95,000.00 from Zanin which sum is payable by a Promissory Not and secured by a Deed of Trust on property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 2. As part of the consideration for said loan, Westbank does hereby grant to Zanin an option to purchase the property described in Exhibit A for the sum of $600,000.00 at anytime from the date of execution of this agreement through March 9, 1994, with the $95,000.00 due on the Promissory Note and any accrued interest being the down payment and the balance of the purchase price in the form of a Promissory Note secured by a first Deed of Trust payable with no interest for the first year and 10% per anrum thereafter payable in annual installments on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th anniversary of the closing. The entire principal and accrued interest if not sooner paid shall be due and payable on the 5th anniversary of the closing. Zanin shall exercise the option to purchase the property by giving Westbank written notice of his exercise of the option. Title to the property shall be transferred free and clear of all encumbrances except those accepted by Zanin and be by general warranty deed except the water rights shall be by quit claim deed. Closing shall be held within 30 days of the notice of exercise of the option and shall be subject to Zanin approving the title insurance commitment that Westbank shall provide to Zanin at least 10 days prior to closing. Westbank will pay for the title insurance and taxes shall be prorated at closing. 3. If during the time of Zanin's option to purchase Westbank receives an offer acceptable to it to purchase the entire property described on Exhibit A then Westbank shall give Zanin written notice of said offer and he shall then have the right to purchase said property on the same price, terms and conditions of said offer during the 30 days after receipt of said notice. If Zanin does not agree to purchase said property during said 30 day period then Westbank shall be free to sell the property to the original offerer free from any claim by Zanin including his option to purchase described herein which shall terminate subject to paying off the Deed of Trust on the property due to Zanin. If the sale to the offerer does not close then Zanin's option to purchase the right of first refusal shall still be in effect as described herein. 1 BM 825 MOM 4. If Eanin purcha ap' *aid pr,ipert.y pursuant to this agreement from Nestbank then Nestbank agrees that it will subordinate its first Deed of Trust to a construction loan in the aunt of the construction drawn at are ithrough daonproperty the normal construction draw through the lender or other escrow agent. S. If 7,anin purchases raid property pursuant to this agreement Westbank shall grant to Zanin by Quit Claim Deed all water rights then owned by Westbank and all eater agreements that have been negotiated by Westbank with the Westbank Rr.nch Romeowners 1lasociation for the joint une of the existing domestic water system in place for the Westbank Ranch Subdivision. 6. If Eanin purchases said property pursuant to this agreement from Westbank the geed of Trust given to Westbank shall provide that Zanin may receive a partial release from the Deed of Trust tor each lot of the existing subdivision upon payment of the sum of $10,000.00 for each lot or dwelling unit on multi unit lots, whichever is greater, in principal due on said Deed of Trust. If the existing subdivision is vacated then the partial release price shall be $10,000.00 per acre and be in a general square shape and shall provide access and utility easements for the remaining acreage as determined by Westbank. 7. This Right of First Refusal is personal to Zanin and shall not be transferred or assigned without Westbank's written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In witness whereof the parties have executed this agreement on the date first above written. STATE OF COLORADO } ss. COUNTY OF 77 -TX } Westbank Ranch No. 1, Ltd. Byk .ldhn Huebinger, Jr.,re dent /of Westbank Developm nt o., `-Inc., General Partner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /1-& day of March, 1992, by Joe Zanin and John Huebinger, Jr., President of Westbank Development Co., Inc. Witness my hand and official seal. ' ,`,,,.N�y'u My commission expires:.St 077/1/3 Q.... ,1 10 Notary Pub 1 1 i xiitt4TT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land situated in Lot 15 of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 Meat of the Sixth Principal Metidian, Lots 11,14,15,24 and 25 of Section 1, and Lot! 1 R,n,9,9,1, 12 13,14,15.14,18,19,20,21 and 22 of Section 2, Township 7 South,' � 8 W Range 89 Nest of the Sixth Principal Meridian, all in Garfield County, Colorado, lying Southerly of Westbank Ranch Planrcd Development Subdivision Filing No. 1 c and Westbank Ranch Subdivision Filing No. 2 and No. 3, as amended, all as filed in the Garfield County, Colorado records, and Westerly of a line in said Sectiond1 partly described by Book 416 of Page 336 as filed in the Garfield Ccunty, records, said parcel of land is more fully described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Lot 5 in said Section 2, whence the Northwest Corner of said Section 2 bears: 8.09'44'39"W. 602.75 feet; thence N.01°57'00"E. 61.45 feet along the Westerly boundary line of Lot 15 In said Section 35 to the Southwest Corner of said Westbank Ranch Filing No. 1; thence, along the Southerly boundary lines of said Westbank Ranch Filings No. 1, No. and No. 3, 8.77'39'00"E. 112.73 feet; thence 8.63'05'52"E. 159.87 feet; thence S.35'32'48"E. 210.99 feet; thence 'S.31'43'00"W. 75.00 feet; henc'03'00"E. ence S.69'27'00"E. 130.00 feet; thence S.28'57 00 W. 160.00 feet; 190.00 feet; thence S.45'23'00"E. 130.00 feet; thence S.05'23'20"W. 300.15 feet; thence 5.61'18'14"E. 231.81 feet; e thenceG'S.28'07'OE. "E.45 fe160.00hfeet; thence OO"E. x'92.8. 78.0feet; feet; N.26c07,29"E. 82.61.feet;•thence 5.64°37'00"F. 5.79';7'00"E. 492.88 feet; thence 336.67 feet; thence 5.69'29'00"E. 390.82 feet; thence 5.81'03'00"E•. 358.60 feet; thence 8.89'22'00"E. 342.78 feet; thenc 0O'00"C. (49.80 feet; thence 8.87'02'00"E. 374.60 feet; thence 8.61'c0'41"L. 5.76'37'00"E. 39.95 feet; thence S.50'31 33„ E. 298.72 feet; 339.92 feet, thence 5.50'00'00"E. 25.74 feet; thence 303.16 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 329.13 feet, the chord of which 6 oath: S.i'6, having 292.56 radius ofe45.001ifeet, theence 2chordtoflwhichhe arc bears:ofS.61'13e'45"E. to the feet t, g whence the 59.69 feet to a point on the said described line in said Section 1, Northwest Corner of said Section 1 bears: 8.20'00'40"W. 1523.72 feet; thence, leaving said Westbank Ranch filings, along the said described line, S.19'41'00"E. 196.35 feet; thence S.34'08'C0"E. 283.00 feet; thence S.52'22'00"E. 706.00 feet; thence 5.32'58'00"E. 582.60 feet; thence 5.44'29'00"E. 549.27 feet (record 406.0), more or less to a point on the East line of Lot 24 in said Section 1; thence, leaving the said described line, 5.01'18'00"E. 252thence feet, more re"or less, to the South. 1st Corner of Lot 24 in said Section 1; thence 1965.07 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 25 in said Section 1; S.00'48'12"E. 843.20 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Section 2; thenceiienee 8.89'21'20"W. 2606.34 feet to the South Quarter Corner of said Section 2; 8.01'04'18"W. 2139.78 feet to the Southeast Corner of Lot 16 in said Section 2; (whence the Center of said Section 2 bears: N.01'04'18"W. 465.01 feet); thence 5.89'57'32'8. 745.65 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 16 in said Section 2; thence N.00'0,'3'.E. 468.68 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 16 in said Section 2; thence N.89'45'00"U. 606.04 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 8 of W. feet o in siinSsaidoSectionh2; thlencce•05.89'147'29"W.00722.54tfeetetoothewCornerwest Southwest 8Corner ion 8 e. t Curof ncr o[Lot5 i ot 5 in saidn5cctionc2,ctl�c lOOINT'OF,BEGINNINCG feet Co chc Nor[,wes twig 825 Pict 964 April 1, 1990 a.� 1 t:'\ pMM /arYMM WA* Ik 11IM!t WWII Pi 11.11 PI A r1rMt1 Mi11 r'Rt nal it ANA w Intern, t t14Ai t I.trti M, r1N ver 1 ! IMI s i r1MK ■IIRIQMI V IV I11l1rt/rerM that Mt en Ot P* MOM IMO M ceusuttre Went WPM DEED OF MIST (Due on Trylnde► - Strait MIS L��1f rI) Of TRl'S1 is mate rhl _ do .A March /2111__ . w 9Z , I+et«eem _-- Westbank Ranch No. r _a Align -y- 1p"AfNY°rl' i tc. b�3�o k tiner�Glem100t� Springer oaMsse edllrevr n _- _... _ _ and the Puhly ltostee .0 the Cowry to *hien the property trier parap•epti II is situated 1 trustee t, tea the benefit of (I eaten whose address is Wiif tott t, A MIA,M 40160004 CM?,CJI/1 Bfl V 1 !% MetEN►S Joe 2anin 308 McSkimming Pond, Amnon, Cblorado 81611 Ilnmwtet aria+ 1 ender crwe..ent and agree as hollows I Prowls in 1nett Borrower in .,nsidereti n M Ale mdeluedness herein milted ami the nnrst hereat created. hereby prams and 4rrliscys M Trustee tnO(ru1irt h p.rwet of salt, the 'Whining peso rifled pn.fwns hK akd In the . C o arty of Garfield wd Mete of Colored' See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. Together with the following water rights See Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. *$,ch has the add" rW Vacant ._+and_._.. Glenwood Sarins_,____.__ .r„ %well Colorado 8.1601 tP1ofxry Addtrrisl. together with Al its apftrulcnance..Pioprroy1. Note. (hher ()Nutation. Secured Thtr feel of trust is given to secure to Lender: A the refwynlenI 01 the indebtedness evidenced M Romwer's note (Nowt dated pumKrpal.am.W Ninety Five Thousand 00/100 u S IkWlat, *oh interest on the unpaid principal balance Intro March m 92 until paid. Y rhe not of _.._10..._.____.,.._. percent per annum, with principal and interest payablel 308 McSkimming Road, Aspen, Colorado 81611 1u such other pl:a-e as the 1 ender may designate, in One interest only r rnenlid Nine Thos nd Five Hundred and 00/100 March, 1993 ? 00.00 1 dux .n rise t 1 Dollars (CrS S t__..------_ _ _.. - ------------_. dry oWeark Mt•a.atti'w. •N► • .u.ch payments to continue until the entre indebtedness evidenced by sad N.ite 1, lulls paid, however. if not via iner Lucid the entire principal an1.unt outstanding and accrued interest thenen, shall be the and payable tat _- rC4 _1._ . _____ _. , IV 94 . ,19 92 wive I I it and Borrower is to pay to 1.enlcr a law (tarp, ru L-A -dodo. -_. ,sal un. Nutrient not recenrd by the Lender within NSA __ _ dans atter (pyrene is due. and Borrower ha, the 1 1 hi hr prepay the principal amount outstanding under said Note. mwhole oxinpart anamtiny withonpenalty waft . Interest on the entire indebtedness shall increase to 15% per annum from the date of default. 14 the payment du all ,ether sum, with unere tlereom at •._ 'r pet annum, oh,hursed M Letdrr m accordance with this burl of Into to protect the security rd this Deed of Trust: and (' the ecrtr.m.ane of the cr,%rnants and agreements of Bummer herein contained. r Title tiorrower covenants that &.rr.wer owns and has the right Io grant and convey the Pn.prrty, and wamints title to the sane. subject to general real estate taxes ha the current year. taxmen's of record or in exnstet e. and tern rded declarations. restrxtirms, reservations and covenants it any. as o1 this date and except an easement hereby reserved by BOrtGrer as reasonably needed for the existing water tank and distribution lines in place fox the. Potable Mimetic Water System serving the Westlhank Ranh Subdivision Filing No.'s 1, 2 and 3 together with access thereto and the right to operate, maintain,' replace and repair said system. a Payment o1 ?littoral and Interest Borrower %hull pmmlaly pn when clue the principal 01 and interest on the indebtedness tiented hy the Note, and tare, hatter as omitted in the Norte and ,hall pertorm alI.0 Borrower', other covenants contained in the Note. S ApplHalirm of Payments Nil payments received hs 1 sender uncle' the terms hero'( shall he applied M Lender fiat in payment of • amounts doe twtsuant tit pwagraph 2 11•.scrss Fundi, Irl. Taxes and Insuranel, then to ainamts dishUrsed hy Lender pursuant tt1 paragraph 11 tProtection sal lenders Security l• and the balance in accordance with the temp and conditions of the Note. \n'Itl"11 V! x.111, 1r11t'•1 Ihrt Ib ea G.,d P d �, imp r ri ru`n1 • 111010,.2l1M _ 491 enrf 25 P*RCA ,4 Irina Charats. 1 tern Plornorr/ that' 01 .4 I t, abhpailati% under Ans poor ibted in and aro .4PW, pro, 'WTI, PlOrrVIWCI NS All Ides As.4•1,111,1“n.4 4whoar% hors and impositions attributableto Iliefiropent o htrh nun have as »priority river ltieut of 1 oto sa.i sy,m4,1 pe mental* annual rent.. if AM it, the MINIM'? i ft, eilart4t0) T it now ',am& 1 a lave arki !mortar% e )01, if �. hr aid in such manna h% notrovier manta pionient Rot"' s 44,e ender. !hall • I se. h.4.1igation by defend enforcement ot such (*ligaion 1, when itnt, airrytts t., the paw.• rrvil riestott at ton roar . lionoort -hall ma ha region d mat c rimmed% othetssive requfred thiteed presenting, shish 0pe, at,' to turvent the •••nfoi, emern of 1hr ofatatton w torreinstr al the Pattern, of any fool thereof, rally !I wpm {lam avvr mat ota att sot.. ,4100.sit,tritktiTetli‘. 444 .,thes pit't mrni. As i,,klerest re, die ono to the rettdn al the m which such proetritngs Art filed Noreen Insitomer Plormor! shall keep the onntswemeni. rtla existing or hereanet elected IN, the Pivotally insured against los. M. fire or Itatards 'minded v. Om the term -extended ..-'wit • In an amount at lert equal hi the levier to (11 the fnsurahle value of the Priverty or t 2 t an amount saint ion to pay the Sfun, %esnrd by this Deed of trust as well as an prim encumbrances on the Mildly. The mwrance tune! fen tiling the intfirantt- shall he qualified 10 write Prittiero: Insurance in rtaittailit and shall he chosen hy All ot the finalising shill he kriirAn -I'topert y 'isogon ( Porrtweer oirnect fit I /Inlel'. right to mutt the shown c wryer fin reanmahle cause k II nentrimse policies and 'Immo& thereof shall tratinle a Atsfulard mortgage shore in toot 01 4 emiet end shall ;manic that On mannan e Aoki than notify I ender at least *1(11(1)days ,) twine cant Oman termination or any material charier 01 r,fretaar lanimut rola iris shall he finnechect to 4 end. r itt hefore clean'. I emir shell haw thneht to NMI the talkies atal renewals thefra In the event in lins. Roentgen skill give prompt nonce to the insurance carnet and I ender 4ender nay: make moot of knit if not 11 Insurance rttocee.ts shall te applied to Irstorallf41 fr4V11 Monett, damaged, provided ow,' restoration Of Rile* Ilk made promptly in Homiseet rionornis alit frond* and tr.: 'e snits al this Ileed ot Irmo is not thereby impaired If *inn resmratton or repair n lot economically fetrihte ot it the secittny i4 the Peed .4 Trust 'souk! he Unpaired. the insuram:e linnets*, shall he applied to the sums Witted hy this !Wed ot Inist tth the CU.VA,if any. paid to Borrower. If the PrIlleft Is ahandimed b% Borrower, or it 1411M/Wer fails to reamed to 1 owlet %. ithin iI days from the date nonce is giver in rdame with poniard* In IN(iis:et It I ender to RtieTTNiet that the insurance tanner ...freest° Slettle a dam tot insulin) e herrents. I ender ts authorired to collect and apply the insurance rinceeds. at lender's option. either to terdortromi Rpell in the !Invertsot to the sums secured h this tared of Trust An% such aortic:anon al proceeds to principal Shall not extend In 1111%(1.41HIC he due date of the installments re fet red to in paragraphs 4 t Payment of Phillip/II Arid Interest) and wroy% bunds for taws and Insurancei in change the anunint of such installments. • • Nora ithstanding N1011111 herein Ill the lawman. II mulct paragraph 0) 1 At velerition. Ii.otlotiire Other Remedies) the Property is secnined hy 1 modelall tight Ink and interest 04 PI.WtOWCI in ant to any insurance policies and in and to the proceeds theater resulting from darned. to the Property prim itt dw sale or acquisition shall pass to I engin to the extent of the sums secured hy this laced of Trust immediately main to such sale or as quottion • the ughn ttorrower maw hereory,k,i (Alin (ego.,ittinsurance carriers. insurance policies and insurance doceeds are • %rthrect to the rights oa any Nikki (4 a poor deed it toot with respect to said insurame earriers, policies and pniceeds It Preget-Yam-in and Maintenance tit open Borrowet shall keep the Ptoperty in good repair and shall 1101 commit wade Of perrnii. 11/114111111011 tt ivertoration I the Ptopeny and shall comply: with the pros mons of any lease if this Deed of Trust is on a leasehold Binned -I shall jet -torn a't ot Illoriowers ohltgations under Any declarations. covenants, by-laws, rules. or other documents p(wniing thc use. ownership or 1/,'I•rtancy of the Pollen) • Pritteciton of 4 ender' Seeuritt. Except when lititrOWCI has exercised Borrower's rights ander paragraph ft shove, if the Bornnwi fails to pertorm the covenants and wren -tents contained in this Deed of 'Dust. or if a default occurs in a prior lien. itt if any action in proceedtrig is Which marettally affects I enilcr's interest in the Property. then I ender. at I .endet 's option. with 1101111 it Bomweer et required by law. may make such appearance, disburse such sono and take such action 11. 15 necessary to poled lender's interest. including. hut no", litnned to. disbursement of re.vainAble altittney's fees and entry upon the Proy to make repairs. Borrower !tetchy assigns to Lender au. right Borrows), mat have by reason of any prior encumittance on the Pmperly or by lior or otherwise to core any default unskt said newt encumbrance Any amounts dishonest h% 1 ender pUrstiatit to this paragraph tt. with interest thereon, shall become additional inclehtedness of Kornet *secured in this Deed ot rust. Such amounts shall he payable upon nonce Insm Lender to Boomer requesting payment thereof, and 1 filet may bring wit tits Alec:tall% amounts so dishursed plus interest specified in paragraph 244 (Note'. Other (Mtligistioir.s Secured). Nothing cimtained in this paragraph t shall requite Lender to Wilt any expense or take any action hereunder. to Inspection Lender may make in cause to be mink reasnnahk entries upon and inspection of the Pmperty, provided thd Lender shall give Borrower notice poor to any sus h inspection specify:nit reasonable cause therefor related to Lender's interest ia the Property 11 t'inxtemnation The proceeds of Any award or claini tor damages. direct ot consequential, in connection with any con- demtuitton ot 'Oct taking of the PropettN, ot part thereof. or lot conveyance in lieu of condemnation, arc hereby assigned and shall be paid to I .ender as hewn remitted Ilimewt. 311 of the rights of Borrower and Lender hereunder with respect to such proceeds are subject to the rights ol in% holder of a prior deed of trust In the event ot a ental taking id (ht, Property. the proceed, shall he applied it the sums secured hy this laced of Trust. with the CICCIAl. any. nerd to Borrower. In the event ol a partial taking of the Property. the proceeds remaining after taking out any part of the award due an. prior hen holder tnet award) shall be divided between Lender and Borrowerin the same ratio as the amount of the sums secured by this Deed ,4 Trust intmediatel% prior to the date of taking hears to flornmer's equity in the Property immediately Kix to the date of taking Borrowers equity in the thriveny means the fair market Y'allit ol the Property less the amount of sums secured by both this Deed of 1 rust and all prior liens (except taxes) that are to receive any: of the award, all at the value imntediately prior to the date of taking. 44 thc Pmpeny is abandoned by Borrower, or if. after notice by Lender to Bommer that the condemnor offers to make an award or settle a claim for dam:sees Borrower fails to respond it lender within 30 days after the dale such notice is given. Lender is authorized to Ilel I and apply the proceeds. at Lender's option. either to M4,43601'1 or repair of the Property Otto the sums waned by this Deed of it 1st Ans stun appl teat tint 01 pnweerl, to principal 4iall ma extend or postpone the due date of the installments referral to in paragraphs 4 IPay mem of Principal and Interest) and 21 tEscntss• hinds for Tates and Insurance] nor change the amount of such installments. 12 Histmwer Not Released Extension of the tint(' for payment or modification of amortization of the sums secured by this Deed of Trust granted hs lender to any successor in interest of Bomeiver shall not operate to release. in any manner, the liability of the original Borrower. ran Borrower's successors in interest, (tum the onginal terms of this Deed of Trust. Lender shall not be required to commence proceeding% against such successor or refuse to extend time !Or pin ment in otherwise modify amortization of the sums secured by this Deed of Trust by lemon of An% demand made by the original Borrower nor Bomnver's successors in interest. 13 htthearance by Lender Not a Waiver. Any forbearatio by Lender in exercising any nab* or remedy hereunder. or otherwise afforded, b% shall not he a saner o preclude the exercise 0 any such right Of remedy. 14 Remedies. Conn ative Each remedy provided in the Mote and this Deed 44 Trust is distinct from and cumulative to all atter rights or remedies under the Note and this Deed of Trust or afforded by law in eqUi y. and may be exercised cemcurfently, independently '01 successively,. 15. Successors and Assigns Bound. Joint and Several Liability (aptions The covenants mut agreements herein contained shall Nnd. and the rights hereunder shall inure to, the respective successor, and assigns of I .smder and Borrower, subject to the pnwisions of paragraph 24 iTransler ii1 the Property Assumption) All covenants and agreements ot Borrower shall he joint and several. The captions and headings of the paragraphs in this Iked of Trust are for convenience 11111) and are not to be used to inlet Art or define the provisions hereof. 16. Notice. Except for any notice required by ISW in he given in another manner. tar any nonce to Bornaiver provided for in this . • Deed of Trust thall be in writing and shall he given arid he effective upon ( I delivery to Borrower or i2) mailing such notice by first-class U 5 mail. atklressed to Borrower at Borrowers address stated herein or at such other address as licirmwer may designate by notice to Lender as minuted herein. and (hi any notice to Lender shall he in tt•Iting anti shall he given and he effective upon II ) delivery to Lender or 12 ) mailing such notice by ttrst-sla.1 S mad. to Lender', address stated herein or to such other address as Lender May designad by *Mice to Born twer as provided herein Any nohre pr.n ided fin in this Deed of Trust shall be deemed to haw been given to Borrower Or I.Z.1.4:1CT when given in any manner designated herein. 1/ (overning l.aw. Scverahility The Nole and this Deed tit Trust shall he governed hy the law: of (.44orado. In the event that any pnwision or clause of this I)eed of Trust or the Note conflicts with the law. such conflict shall not affect other provisions of this Deed of Trust or the Nole which can be given effect without the conflicting pnivision, and to this end Ilk. provisions (It the Deed of -trust and Note are declared to be severable. • ..r r. �rorap ry Aaar h+l Ij IR. Ac•cekratam. pntetkestue. (Hirt Remdies. od acer Borrower provided in rl tit Tort a urn env of the � riot Ike the opt* &otowers Itreath of any mwenant rK agreement Property, tunleas Ronower has men. teed Rormwer's rights timer pparagrep h h',Myst.). o I ender „gates. all rel the sums seemed by thilt heed ti That shall tme ,aW h due and pevahlc t AccekratkmI lb esero oe )firs option. 1 ender mey invoke the powered sale and ally ether remedies permitted by law 1.emfer shall he crottle) to c•rlleat all teeamable trots and espenaes f conal in mowing Ihte remedies provided in this Dred ol )heat. itKhoding. hitt no longed tot, n•aamahle a1Io0w 's fees If 1 ender invokes the rower 01 sale. 1 ender shall give written moist to Inisaes of such electron Thence shalt give %nth malice In Bremner ol Borrower's nits is is prosxfr•et by law iltster shall ret .mi a copy of such mince as required by law trustee shall (Overlie( the time and p)a c of the sale n1 the Pnaprnv fist mot less than ken weeks in a Iirwapafw•t of general cin lams in each r mint % in which the pn1rrrty i% situated. and shall mail cores t4 web notice of sok ..o Homower ant alet pends a% pre tt led to Ira. AHct the 'spat d such time Naivety he required by law. root• without demand on Borrower shall sell the Property at pnhlic ma lion to the highest bidder for cash at the time amt piece (what mss he r of the Pic+(oe' rt y a any pat tlwns, i ns permitted M. least in . me or more pan el as Trnatee may • think hest and it atwh order n bunter ma drternim I endo to l end em's designee may purehow the Property at any ale It ahrll not be obligators upon 1 le purchmer at any such sale to ser 40 the apslieatnm of the purchase money trtntee that aryl. the rnw•eed%.4 the safe m the hollow ing order: (al to all nommable costs and rxpxnses of the sale, inelodine. but not limited to. reaavnahle Trustee's and strumaes s kgs and costs of title evkkm e. (hi 10 alt aims secured by this !teed of frust. and lc 1 the auras. 4 any. to the person or mums legally entitle.) thereto lu Ltov owrr's Right no Cure Default. Whenesen fiteclromre is commenced ht mmpaynsent o4 any sums due hereunder. the owners of the Preteens or parties liable her'e'on shall he entitled to cunt said defaults by promp ell delinquent mins trot and interest ravmrms doe as of the date of cure, costa, expenses late charges, attorno's fees and ahct kgs all in the manner provided lay dew lipon such payment, this, Deed of Bust end the obligations acetify() hereby shelf remain in full time ansl el4est as though no Acceleration had occurred, 11m) the hteckoute pnweedmgs shalt ler discontinued. 241 Aaaignme 4 of Renta. Aliponmmenl of Receiver: Lendet in pra+w.ai. .%AMIu111 uyereur herby assigns to end^t the rent* f the Pnmetty. however. Iltmnwer shall. pr/1 In AamnktdeIR ( Borrower Reclosure; Other Remedies, to ahankrnment 14 the Properly. have the right to collect and retain %itch rents as they become due and payahk t ender m the e holler of the Trustee's ecttthcate of purchase shall he entitled to a receiver fir the Property eller Acceleration under paragraph la iAccelerahim. fxtecloosul ()tier Remedies). and shall also he w entitled during the time coveted hy forecl0sure • rnwrcfing. and the pend id redemption. if are and .hall be entitled thereto ass matter o4 right without regard to the solvency Of • insolvency of Honwser .t of the then .wens o4 the Pniperty. and wthut regard to the value thereof Such receiver may he appnIMed by any Court of competent jurisdiction upon ex parse application and wnhent notice mote! trine hereby expressly waived. t!pon .Acceleration under paragraph IR 1 Aceeletalllm. Fen kome. (Other Remedies) of abandonment of the Property. Lender. in - persm. he agent or ho pudwtally appointed receiver. shall he emitted to %mer upon (s,4 a p eecssiom of and manage the Property and t0 collect the rents t4 th Pogo % including those past due All rents collected by I e1111e1 or the receiver shall he applied, first. to payment a the costa rel preservation and management of the property. second. to Payment• due upon pot liens. and then to the sums secured by ' this Deed o4 Trust Lender and the receiver %hall he liable M account oils ton those rents actually received • 21 Release 1 from moment of all sums secured by this heed sat Tt ust . 1 enact she{I cause Trustee to release this fMd or truer and quill produce bt Tnistee the Note Borrower shall ray all coos o4 recordation and •h:dl pay the %fatubts 1 rusiee'e tees. If Lerner shall ret pnducc the Nae as atoicsatd. then L ender. upon notice in accordance with paragraph Ib (Notice) froth Bloomer to (..ender, %Lail obtain. at 1 ender 's expense. and hie any lost instnnnent Meat requited hs trustee o1 pay the coot thereof wettest the relax Of this feed M Trust 22 Waiver of Exemptions. Borrower hereto waives all right ill hmlcsread and an other exernptiom in the Pmperty under stale or *dere( law presently existing or hereafter enacted scow Funds kw Taxes and Insurance i his paragraph 23 is rot applwahle if Funds as defined below are being paid pu to a Pnnr , . Suhlect to ap4licahle la*. Bietxwver shall pay to Lenler.om each day installments of principal and ' st are payrhk unlet the Ni tit the Note is paid in full. a sum therein iefenrd to as "funds) equal to __—_.-___ ofthe }earls taxes and assessments " may attain priority over this heed of trust. plus _._..___ of yearly premium mstallnents f0t Property Insurance. a . asonahl' estimated initially and from time to time by _ on the basis of assessments and hills and reaumahle estimates thereof, takenaccount am excess hinds not used ors ges. Tlic petncipal of Ow Funds ds shall he held in a se - act, ant by the lender in . of the benefit of the Borrower and deposited in an institution the deposits .11. acounts of which are insure c anted h a - a of state agency. Lender shall apply the Funds to pay said taxes. assessment% and insurance premiums lender may rot so holding and applying the Funds. analyzing said account or verity mg and compiling said assessments and hilts Lender s. 11 he d to pay Boxnwver any interest of earnings On the Fonda, Lender shall gree to Flom.. ver a uthtm charge. an annu tinting of (444 hinds 'ng credits and debits to the Funds and the purpose for which each debit lu• the Funds was made i s are fledged a. additional sec • the sums secured by this Deed of Trost. 11 this amount of tun Funds held by L shall not be sufficent to pay taxes. assessments . surance premiums as they fall dt.ea Borrower shall pay to Lender any r necessary to make up the deb( tency within 30days from the o ice is given in accordance with paragraph Ih (Notice cider 1 • Borrower requesting pay mem Ihereo4 Upon pay men of all sums secured by this Deed of Trust. 1 ender shall simultaneously refund to Boomwe nds held by Lender It u aragraph IR 1 Acceleration: Foeclosure.Other Remedies nh Property is sold or the Property is otherwise 'iced by I, ndcr shall apply. no later than immediately prior to the sale of to Property or its acquisition by Lender. whichever occurs 24: 1ranster of the Property: Assumption The Mika ing events shall he rete ted to herein as a "Transfer": (it a transfer or conveyance of title to an portion thereof legal tit equitable) °, do. ProTern too any lea t therms( or interest )herein). (ii) the execution of a contract of agreement creating a right to title lot :my portion thereof kgaj or equitable) in the Property tax any tart thereof or interest therein) ( Ili tor an agreement granting a possessor)right in the Property lir as portion thereof I. in excess if torn (3) years. I iv) a sak or transfer of. or the execution of a contrast or agreementreaciing.. a right leo acquire of receive. more than fifty percent 1509E) of the controlling interest or mere than lifts percent (Net I of the beneficial interest in the: Borrower. tvl the reorganization. liquidation or dissolution of the Hommel Not to le included as a.1ranskr art (i 1 the creation of a lien or encumbrance suh ordinate to this heed of Trust. l ii l the creation of a purchase money security- interest for household ld appliances. tut iii) a transfer by devise, descent or hy operation of the law upon the death ed a tom tenant At tun election ti Lender. in the event of each and every lranskr: mal Alt sums secured by this Deed of Trust shall become immediately due and payable (Acceleration). (b) It a Transo'r occurs and should Lenkr not exercise Lender's opium pursuant Porins paragraph 24 to Accelerate. Transferee shall he deemed to have assumes: all of the obligations of Borrower under this Decd of trust including all sums secured hereby whether or not Me instrument evidencing such conveyance. contract of grant c- Pressly so pmwides This covenant shall run with the Property and remain in full force and effect until said sums are paid in full The I .ender may withut voice to the Bornwyer deal with Transferee in the same manner as with the Borrower with reference to said sums including the pay mem or credit for Transferee of undisbursed reserve Funds on payment in full rel said sums. w 'Mout in any way altering or dies harging the Borrower's liability hereunder for the obligations hereby lc 1 Should Lender not elect to accelerate upon the A e unence of such transfer then. subject to t hi abtwe. the mere tact of r lapse d secured. i time of the acceptance o4 payment subsequent to any 01 such events. whether of nor Lender haul actual of constructive noticed such t' Transfer. shall not he deemed a wailer of Lender's right to make such election not shall Lender he estoppel therefrom by virtue thereof. '! The issuance on behalf od the lender of a routine statement show ing the status of the loan. whether or ret lender had actual or colsrn:tise uat,ce a such transfer, shall not he a watser o1 estoppel of lander', said right. 2S H.rn•wer's Copy. Borrower acknowledges receipt dt a copy if the Note and this Deed of frust s Ata 825 net8lt II� I . Continued on reverse side. No DEED OF TRUST PROM TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE FOR THE USE OF STATE OF COLORADO. County of 1- 1 hereby c nh that this ievromem rm. (.k -d for record mnor office et ochc► M _ 19 and is duty recorded in hoot _ Pthge Rim No Rearms Mo. By M .m Fee, S arrvfes/ 7 o : 1L/. /—itg&C) 4,30 E. srj -i�hv fT 41S1E-idi (poo, 6/b'/ ....,.WO RAMS*. CO s pi, f if G.+3 3 y 3 e . w ' 4 3 Y r• iY s z �� f r it A 1 A 7 2 V .4 0 n 'au►u.vw►wrtxts,Itt.welM' a w 7 1v►►tii4let 1v1L 16w A ;t VimOi1diMt �1 MI ))4 McItt kV till feta► Fl)OITRrT A LEGAL OF. CI71P lON �rn,w M2R p o969 April 1, 1990 A pntect of land situated in Lot 15 of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range b9 West of the Sixth Principal tlrtidian, Lots 13,14,15,2. and 25 of Section 1, and Lots 5.8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,13,19,20,21 and 22 of Section 2, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, all in Garfield County, Colorado, lying Southerly of Wcstbank Ranch Planned Development Subdivision Filing No. 1 and Wcstbank Ranch Subdivision Fi1ina No. 2 and No. 3, as amended, all as filed in the Carficld County, Colorado records, and Westerly of a line in said Section 1 partly described by Rook 416 of Page 336 as filed in the Carficld County, Colorado records, said parcel of land is more fully described as follows; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Lot 5 in said Section 2, whence the Northwest Corner of said Section 2 bears: N.89'44'39"W. 672.75 feet; thence N.01°57'00"E. 81.45 feet along the 'lesterly boundary line of Lot 15 in said Section 35 to the Southwest Corner of said Wcstbank Ranch Filing No. 1; thence, along the Southerly boundary lines of said Wes•bank Ranch rilings No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, N.77'39'00"E. 112.73 feet; thence N.G3'09".2"C. 159.87 feet; thence S.35'32'48"E. 210.99 feet; thence S.31'43'00"W. 75.00 feet; thence S.69'27'00"E. 130.00 feet; thence 5.28.57'00"W. 160.00 feet; thence N.86'03'00"E. 190.00 feet; thence 5.45'23'00"E. 130.00 lett; thence S.05'23'20"W. 300.15 feet; thence 5.61'18'14"E. 231.81 feet; thence 5.28'07'00"E. 160.00 feet; thence N.60'30'00"E. 78.00 feet; thence 5.37'06'00"E. 55.45 feet; thence 5.79'17'00"E. 492.88 feet; thence ft:26°07'29"E: 82.61.feet;.thence 5.64°37'00"E. 336.67 feet; thence 5.69'29'00"E. 390.82 feet; thence 5.81'03'00"E. 358.60 feet; thence N.89'22'00"C. 342.78 feet; thence 5.78'00'00"E. 349.80 feet; thence N.87'02'00"E. 374.60 feet; thence 5.88'23'00"E. 626.00 feet; thence S.7G'37'00"E. 39.95 feet; thence S.50'31'33"E. 298.72 feet; thence N.61'40'61"E. 319.92 feet; thence S.50'00'00"E. 25.74 feet; thence 303.16 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having radius of 329.13 feet, the chord of which bears: 5.76'23'15"E. 292.56 feet; thence 65.26 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 45.00 feet, the chord of which bears: S.61'13'45"E 59.69 feet to a point on the said described line in said Section 1, whence the Northwest Corner of said Section 1 bears: N.20'00'40"W. 1523.72 feet; thence, leaving said Wcstbank Ranch filings, along the said described line, S.19'41'00"E. 196.35 feet; thcncc 5.34'08'00"E. 233.00 fcct; thence 5.52'22'00"E. 706.00 (cct; thcncc 3.)2'58'00"E. 582.60 feet; thence 5.44'29'00"E. 549.27 feet (record 406.0), more or less to a point on the East line of Lot 24 in said Section 1; thence, leaving the said described line, 5.01'18'00"E. 252.92 feet, more or less, to the Southeast Corner of Lot 24 in said Section 1; thence 5.89'37:46"W. 1965.07 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 25 in said Section 1; thence 5.00'48'12"C. 843.20 fee': to the Southeast Corner of said Section 2; thence N.S9'21'20"W. 2606.36 Leet to the South Quarter Corner of said Section 2; thence N.01'0''18"14. 2139.78 feet to the Southeast Corner of Lot 16 in said Section 2; (whence the Center of said Scct.cn 2 bears: N.01'04'18"W. 465.01 feet); thcncc 5.&9'57'32"W. 745.65 feet to th.. Southwest Corner of Lot 16 in said Section 2; thcncc N.00'03'32"E. 468.68 fcct to the Northwest Corner of Lot 16 in said Section 2; thence N.89'45'00"14. 606.04 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 8 it said Section 2; thcncc N.00'02'31"W. 858.00 feet to the Northwest Corner of 1.ot 8 in said Section 2; thcncc S.89'41'29"W. 722.54 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 5 in said Section 2; thence N.00°43'57"E. 797.26 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 5 in said Section 2, the POINT OF BEGINNING, 1 SXR/BIT • t. 825 • pot $70 • Together with but without warranties of any kind all t water rights, ditch, ditch rights and easements associated therewith that are owned by Borrower after Borrower has eeteted,; into an agreement with the Westbank Ranch Homeowners AssoClatIon( to trAnsfer certain water rights for use in the Westbank Rapch • Subdivision Pilings No.'s 1, 2 and 3 and the joint use of the existing domestic water system in place for the Westbank Rauch,. Subdivision. MOUNT SOPRIS SO CONSERVATION DISTRICT P.O. BOX 1302 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 AUGUST 9,1993 Mark Bean, Planner Garfield Cty. Planning Department 109 8th St. Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Dear Sir, yY r. rtH 4 'r 4.0t £ P. At the regular monthly meeting of the Mount Sopris Soil Conservation District, the Board reviewed the application and plan for the Westbank Ranch filing #4 Subdivision and have the following comments and concerns about the project. Some of the lots are very steep and various uses such as sewage disposal and roads will be severely impaired by the steep terrain and may cause enviornmental damage to neighbouring lots. Adequate space should be left between building sites to insure that damage does not move on to other lots. Any cuts for roads or construction should be revegetated to prevent erosion. Weed free seed and mulch should be used for any reseeding of the area. Monitoring of all seedings should be done to see if the grass is establishing or if weeds are becoming a problem. Reseeding or weed control practices should be implemented if a problem is noticed. The board is always concerned about animal control in areas where there is the potential for conflict between wildlife or domestic livestock and dogs from the subdivision. Dogs running in packs of two or more can maim or kill domestic livestock and wildlife. The District recommends animal control regulations be adopted in the covenance for the subdivision and that they be inforced. Storm water drainage has the potential to cause erosion and flooding on low areas of this development. Engineering recommendations for control of drainage should be closely followed by the builder and/or homeowner. All culverts and floodways should be installed to handle flow requirements and prevent soil erosion. They felt that any disturbance of soil could adversely affect other landowners, and great care should be taken to mitigate as many of the problems as possible which arise when building on an alluvial fan deposit area. IltThe District feeZ'� that erosion of soil from ind during the construction phase of the project may cause air pollution and dust problems for neighbors. A source of dust that may be a problem is from road traffic. The District would like to see wind erosion and dust control practices installed to prevent these problems. The District feels that dust should be controlled during the construction phases of this project. The main concerns continues to be control of erosion, and any disturbed areas should be revegetated and monitored for growth to prevent erosion. Sincerely, Dee Blue, President Mount Sopris Soil Conservation District