The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03.0 Correspondence2014 BLAKE AVENUE 411 411 GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO B1601 June 5, 1979 TO ALL REVIEWING AGENCIES: PH❑NE 945-8212 Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Plat for the second filing of Los Amigos P.U.D. It includes Plase I and Phase II of the original plan. There are 66 single family lots. We would appreciate your comments on this proposal by Monday, July 9, 1979. If I can answer any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Ray Baldwin Planning Director RB/hr Enc. STATE OF COLORADO Richard D. Lamm, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Jack R. Grieb, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 (826-1192) 5 July 1979 ray Baldwin Planning Director Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 JUL 91979 GARpikLD L Dear Mr. Baldwin: I have reviewed the preliminary plan for the Los Amigos P. U. D. filing No. 2. Representatives of the Division of Wildlife have discussed the wildlife impacts of this development with Dr. Chatmas and his representatives and we have reached agreement on procedures to handle or minimize most of them. In reviewing the information before me at this time, I would like to see th-,e restrictions on dogs tightened up to include a require- ment that dogs not be allowed to run at large even on the owner's property in the lower density housing areas. Kenneling or leash restrictions would do a great deal to prevent the dog -deer conflicts that are so detrimental to deer when they are forced onto the critical winter range such as that contained in this development. Thank you for providing the opportunity to comment cn this project. Sincerely yours, . R. Adams, DWM P. C. Bcx W Basalt, Colorado 81621 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Harris Sherman, Executive Director • WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Vernon C. Williams, Chairman Thomas Farley, Vice Chairman • Sam Caudill, Secretary • Jean K. Tool, Member • Roger Clark, Member Jay K. Childress, Member • Dean Hull, Member • Dean Suttle, Member RICHARD D. LAMM Governor DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE Trs. Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street - Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 3 Administration (303) 839-3581 Ground Water (303) 839-3587 July 5, 1979 Mr. Ray Baldwin, Planning Director Garfield County 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Los Amigos P. U. D. Filing No. 2 Dear Mr. Baldwin: 919, uo. 1..Li, tfiL-R C.J. KUIPER State Engineer This is to acknowledge receipt of preliminary plan information con- cerning the above referenced subdivision. As requested, we have reviewed the water supply plan and it appears that an adequate supply is available from the Spring Valley alluvium. We do believe that additional information should be provided con- cerning the legal entity responsible for ownership, operation and maintenance of the water system. Without proper planning concerning this aspect of the water supply, future homeowners may not have adequate representation with regard to future water system costs. While we have no objection to the approval of the subdivision, we feel that additional information should be provided on the legal entity which will control the water system. H DS : mvf cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng. Land Use Comm. Very truly yours, it A Hal D. Simpson, Chief Water Management Branch For: Dr. Jeris A. Danielson Deputy State Engineer 411 GARFIELD COUNTY • PLANNING DEPARTMENT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 91601 2014 BLAKE AVENUE PH❑NE 945-8212 To: Planning Commission From: Planning Staff Date: July 5, 1979 Subject: Los Amigos Ranch, Filing No. 2 Since the meeting of June 11, the developer and the staff have met trying to resolve the problems which appeared at the last meeting. The following items have been addressed: 1. Roads: Leonard Bowlby and the staff have walked the proposed road alignments. It is our recommendation that all roads meet the County road width requirements and that Lane "B" West and Court "B" not exceed 10% in grade and that all other roads not exceed 8%. 2. Sewage Treatment: It is intended by the developer that all single family lots will be on septic systems. All other lots will be on the central sewage system. 3. Lot Lay Out: It is our understanding that some but not all flag lots have been eliminated. Also, that only a portion of this preliminary plat will be platted as a final plat at any one time. We do not, at this point, have on file any map showing any of these revisions. Also, we have nothing other than a verbal commitment as to the compliance of the duplex lots within the P.U.D. nor number of units per multifamily lot. RB/hr June 29, 1979 • • SUNDESIGNS ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SOLAR CONSULTANTS Mr. Nicholas R. Massaro Superintendent Roaring Fork School District RE -1 P.O. Box 820 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 REF: LOS AMIGOS P.U.D. - PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE Dear Mr. Massaro, GAI?ri4Lll Li). i L"a1NiG13 This letter is a review of our discussions with the Roaring Fork School District Board of Education to date and a response to your letter to Mr. Ray Baldwin dated June 12, 1979. On April 10, 1979, Mike Dakan and I made our initial presentation to the Board. We discussed such items as: the overall Los Amigos P.U.D. and its phasing; the d.u. ration to school site acreage; the initial phase development; the availability of all utilities; the proposed site and its relationship to C.M.C. We returned two weeks later, on April 24, and made a more specific presentation. The site size was increased to 13 acres (up from 12 acres) to com- pensate for the 1 acre access link. A site plan sketch showing possible parking, school size and outdoor activity areas was hand- ed out to Board members and discussed. Two general areas of con- cern were then discussed. The first centered around site access. The proposed access is off CR 114 through a 100' wide x 460' corridor. The topography along the access corridor is such that a cut will be required. A road constructed to county standards would require an approxi- mate cut of 8770 C.Y. By no means insignificant, this cut can be seen in perspective when compared to the potential for earthwork on the school site of 43,000 C.Y. Another concern with access was visibility at the intersection. Proper contouring at the entry to the school will insure adequate vehicular visibility. This can be done because of the straight road to the east and the outswinging, long radius curve to the west. It was our feeling, at that meet- ing, that these concerns were addressed and somewhat resolved. The second area of concern expressed by the Board was that of water availability. There is adequate water supply for all of Los Amigos P.U.D. We indicated that water would be made available to the school. It was suggested that the District's Attorney and 1315 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 303/945-2201 LOS AMIGOS P.U.- PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE June 29, 1979 Page 2 • the Los Amigos P.U.D. attorney get together and work out details on water. Mr. Bill Jochems represents Los Amigos and is availa- ble to discuss this subject at your convenience. Water and sewer service for the school site have been integrated into an engineering studies for this project. Both are availa- ble at the school site boundaries at no cost to the School Dis- trict. However, with the formation of the Sanitary District and Water District, there will be tap fees and service charges to the School as set forth by these Districts. It is our understand- ing that the School District is excluded from ad valorum tax. Since the April meetings we have confirmed the existence of a well on the school site. The well and water supply line may be excluded from the final legal description of the school property but would be available for school use. In your letter of June 12, 1979, you expressed concern about site access and water, which I have addressed previously in this let- ter, and also indicated concern for the proposed commercial site adjacent to the school. It is not our intention that this area be "service" commercial; rather it would be used for special use to the P.U.D. development, C.M.C. and elementary schools which could not be zoned under any other classification (for example, Day Care). I hope this letter answers the questions and concerns raised in your June 12 letter. We are available, at your convenience, to discuss these matters further. Sincerely, S SIGNS A '.EC Richard L. Dart - Architect, AIA cc: Ray Baldwin ✓ RLD/cg RICHARD D. LAMM GOVERNOR D 4 irji COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY �`., 8 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES G4;��'` %b79; 42 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING — 1313 SHERMAN STREET l% 60 DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303) 839-2611 / ,.iFR`:J JOHN W. ROLD Director Mr. Ray Baldwin Garfield County Planning Department Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Baldwin: June 27, 1979 RE: LOS AMIGOS PUD, FILING #2, GARFIELD COUNTY We have reviewed the above referenced application and find that the geologic conditions have been adequately described in a report prepared by Lincoln DeVore Laboratories. The Lincoln DeVore report notes that potentially unstable slopes are present locally in the area and recommends that set -back distances be estahlished. We recommend that set -back distances be determined and plotted on the final plat. Flash flooding possibly could affect parts of lots 53, 54, 55, 80, 81, and 82. We recommend that set -back distances from the drainage be determined and plotted on the final plat. On -lot sewage disposal has been proposed for a part of the subdivision. We recommend that the on -lot sewage disposal systems be designed by qualified personnel and that this requirement be noted on the final plat. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us. WRJ/vt cc: Land Use Commission Sincerely, Walter R. Jun-0._ Engineering Geologist GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST ... KEY TO THE FUTURE KKBNA Scsrrow Walker Incorporated Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors • 14 • r.� SCHOOL SITE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land situated in part of Government Lots Six and Eleven of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado. Said parcel lying northwesterly, in part, of the northwesterly right-of-way line for County Road Number 114 (College Road), said right-of-way line being 30.00 feet north- westerly of and parallel to the centerline of said county road as constructed and in place, easterly, in part, of the east- erly line of Los Amigo Ranch, Filing Number One, and westerly, in part, of the westerly line of a tract or parcel of land as described in Document Number 2.56352 (being Book 438 at page 540) as on file in the Garfield County Records (Note: Bear- ing of said westerly line has been rotated 00°12'12" right to match basis of bearings) said parcel being more particu- larly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Section 8 in said town- ship and range, a stone corner found in place and properly marked; thence N. 29°30'23" W. 1005.43 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Los Amigos Ranch, Filing Number One, a rebar and cap in place, said corner being also on said northwester- ly right-of-way line, the True Point of Beginning; thence, leaving said right-of-way line, N. 25°44'45" W. 539.32 feet along said easterly line to a rebar and cap in place; thence, leaving said easterly line, N. 25°44'45" W. 482.56 feet; thence N. 64°15'15" E. 1047.66 feet to a point on said wes- terly line; thence S. 00°00'12" W. 644.75 feet along said westerly line; thence, leaving said westerly line, S. 64°15' 15" W. 667.56 feet; thence S. 25°44'45" E. 447.39 feet to a point on said northwesterly right-of-way line; thence S. 67° 49'48" W. 100.20 feet along said northwesterly right-of-way line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel containing 13.12 acres, more or less. Bearings for this description were based on a bearing of S. 88°54'23" E. between the Northwest Corner of Section 5, Town- ship 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian and the North Quarter Corner of said Sedtion 5. KKBNA/SCARROW & WALKER, INC. 1001 Grand Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 June 28, 1979 2014 BLAKE AVENUE GARFIELD COUNTY • PLANNING DEPARTMENT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 June 5, 1979 TO ALL REVIEWING AGENCIES: PHONE 945-8212 JUN 2 7 .1979 U, i!i!'!¢- ER Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Plat for the second filing of Los Amigos P.U.D. It includes Plase I and Phase II of the original plan. There are 66 single family lots. We would appreciate your comments on this proposal by Monday, July 9, 1979. If I can answer any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Ray Baldwin Planning Director 7)/1 Tit/ BE LL /D' 4SemetT RB/ hr AL D/VG 5/20e ALL S-Tg73-' Enc. GL1�l,�.�yS, /Po,444,DGUi¢ y Dec/l C/4Tel Po& 1.1Se if By 1.1 Th LiTiLs /22, Adia Roaring Fork School District RE -1 P.O. Box 820 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone (303) 945-6558 June 12, 1979 Mn. Ray 8a.2dw.in Gan4.iad County gemming Ditectat 2014 Geake Avenue Glenwood Sp/zings, Ca.eanado 81601 RE: Lo4 Amigos PUD Phase 1 and Phase 2 NICHOLAS R. MASSARO, Superintendent JUN 13 1979 yAl?FlrLj CO. titA. R Dean Ray: The Roaring Fonk Schoo.e Vi t,' ict 8aatd os Education discussed Los Amigos PUD at thedt negutat meeting an June 11, 1979. As you ate away.e, the 8aand has been .in contact with the devetopen'4 agent negand ing the pnapo4ed 4choo.2 site. There ane st tt sevenat questions that need to be ceea&ed with that site, te, namely water nights and access. Lt does not appear to the Board that the pro pas ed access £4 a sale one, and a 40 the d.i..sticLc.t would Like guarantees bnom the devetopen that water w.i e eventuatey be ptov.cded to the site with no monetary assessment made. The &cad also expn.essed conce.&n about the proposed comme&ciae site dinectey .to the south o5 the 4choaZ site. It was out undenstandJng on.iginatty that this wowed not be commenc.iat prapenty, and we have strong concerns about the proximity o6 a business di,str.i.ct to out schao.e6. We would appreciate you& passing these thoughts on to the Harming and Zoning Comm.i44.ion. NRM / h,e • GARFIELD COUNTY • PLANNING DEPARTMENT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 2014 BLAKE AVENUE MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission From: Planning Staff Date: June 11, 1979 Subject: Los Amigos Subdivision 2 Preliminary Plan Items of Concern PHONE 945-8212 1. Roads Only one road in the subdivision (Drive "A") is proposed to he dedicated to the County and meets County specifications. Many of the roadways have grades in excess of 8%. The County Road Supervisor has stated that he will not accept the street system as shown in the present Preliminary Plan. It is recommended that all internal roadways be to County specs. and that they be dedicated to the County. There is a possibility of at least 5 driveways or roads accessing onto County Road 114. The designer was encouraged to coordinate one entrance with C.M.C.'s plans. 2. Sewage Treatment There is only an interim sewage treatment proposal with C.M.C., no agreement. This interim proposal includes the 96 apartment units in Subdivision 1 and does not mention 311 units in Subdivision 2. Septic systems are proposed for a portion of the single family units. A general area is indicated, but how many and specifically which lots will not be served by central sewer is not explained. 3. Lot Lay Out There are 31 flag lots shown on this plan, some of them with contiqous corridors for access. The staff feels that in addition to this being a sloppy approach to subdivision design, it will burden some lot owners with excessive maintenance costs, cause problems with access for emergency services and create inefficient and confusing situations concerning the responsibility for access to these lots. Because there are no dimensions indicated, it is not certain whether these corridors even meet County requirements for a minimum 25 foot frontage on the access road. 4. School Dedication The subdivision regulations require un to 10% of valuation of the project be dedicated to the School District. The staff questions whether or not the 13 acre tract proposed for a school site is adequate to compensate the School District for the potential impact that this development will create. • • Los Amigos Subdivision 2 Preliminary Plan Items of Concern Page two 5. The number of units proposed for the multifamily lots is not indicated. There are 168 units on 25 lots occupying a total of 84 acres. The plat should show the number of units proposed for each lot. 6. The Los Amigos P.U.D. proposed three 3 -year phases for development. The total number of units for phase one was 214. The total actual units in Subdivision 1 and 2 is 407 or nearly twice the number indicated in the P.U.D. application. The duplex units proposed for Subdivision 2 includes 71 units, but the P.U.D. indicates a total of 62 units for the entire three phases. This is inconsistant with the P.U.D. as approved and should be modified or dealt with by amending the P.U.D. SA/hr • • Roaring Fork School District RE -1 P. O. Box 820 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone (303) 945-6558 July 11, 1979 Mr. Richard Dart 1315 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Dart: NICHOLAS R. MASSARO, Superintendent DWIGHT L. HELM, Assistant Superintendent • WALLACE M. PARKER, Assistant Superintendent, Business JUL 12 1979 GARrit-ZD CO, L.fj, 114n . °vtR On July 9, 1979, the Roaring Fork Board of Education discussed your letter of June 29, 1979. Concern was expressed by the Board of some items in your letter. The Board is stili troubled by the proposed access. They feel that an excessive cut would have to be made if the grade of the entrance is kept to a year -around safe ingress and egress. Also, the visual factor is limited. A much better access would be to the west of the proposed site. Another concern of the Board is arrangements for sewer and water to the site. It is rhe Board's opinion that this should be pro- vided to the property line at no cost to the district. They sug- gest that the Los Amigos attorney draw up a document spelling this out so that it can be referred to the school district's at- torney. If you have further questions, please feel free to con- tact me. Sincerely yours, h•las R. Massaro NRM:fjs cc: Ray Baldwin • • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER, COLORADO 80220 PHONE 320-8333 Frank Traylor, M.D., ecutive Director DATE: July 20, 1979 SUBJECT: NON -STATE ASSISTANCE REVIEW AND COMMENTS TO: Mr. Ray Baldwin Planning Director Garfield County Planning Department Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 PROJECT TITLE: Phase I and II, Los Amigos PUD STATE IDENTIFIER: NA COMMENTS: Air Pollution Control COMMENTS DUE: July 9, 1979 2 197, A subdivision development of this size (570 acres and 311 dwelling units) will have an impact on the air quality of the area. However, the Air Pollution Control Division has no regulatory authority over activities generating sources (generator of auto trips) of air pollution. This subdivision during the con- struction phase has the potential of generating substantial fugitive dust emis- sions from the following: 1) earth moving and grading activities; 2) movement of vehicles on unpaved roads; 3) wind erosion; and 4) tracking of material onto paved roadways and subsequent reentrainment. Normal control measures employed to control the level of emissions are respectively: 1) watering and limiting grading to sites ready for construction and subsequent re - vegetation; 2) paving of heavily trafficked roadways and watering or stabilization of lower volume roadways; 3) re -vegetation; and, 4) cleanup of trackout material. Following initial development major sources of emissions will be: 1) vehicle movement on unpaved roads; 2) dust reentrained from paved roads; 3) wind erosion from exposed areas; and 4) motor vehicle emission. Controls are as follows: 1) paving or other types of stabilization; 2) cleaning of major roadways, curbs and gutters; 3) re -vegetation of exposed areas. We would recommend that the control strategies listed be implemented. 1"ame, Title Micki Barnes, Program Administrator SOC -3, Jan 79 • July 12, 1979 SUNDESIGNS ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SOLAR COtdeSULTANTS Mr. Ray Baldwin Garfield County Planning Director 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 197, 614/0420 14-8 REF: LOS AMIGOS RANCH SUBDIVISION NO. 2 PROOF OF PUBLICATION FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Dear Ray, Enclosed is a copy of the Proof of Publication from the Glenwood Post, for the Notice of Public Hearing published on June 19, 1979. We would appreciate receiving copies of the Notice of Public Hearing materials that were submitted, so that our files will be complete. Sincerely, SUNDESIGNS ARCHITECTS .4‹ Dean K. Moffatt Enclosure DKM/cg 1315 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 303/945-2201 1111MUSICK, WILLIAMSON, SCHWART, LEAVENWORTH & COPE, P.C. 75 MANHATTAN DRIVE - SUITE 1 P.O. BOX 4579 BOULDER, COLORADO 80306 MEMORANDUM TO: Arthur A. Abplanalp, Garfield County Attorney DATE: September 21, 1979 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO. 81601 RE: POWER OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO REQUIRE INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL LANDS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT At the conclusion of the first public hearing for the proposed Spring Valley Sanitation District (SVSD) conducted September 17, 1979, the Commissioners and County Planner expressed a desire to seek the inclusion of adjacent developments within the proposed SVSD boundaries as a condition of approval of the SVSD Service Plan. At that time members of this firm expressed their reservations to you over the ability to require such as a condition of approval of the SVSD Service Plan and of the general ability to contractually bind a yet -to -be -created special district to include additional lands subsequent to district formation. This Memorandum will briefly discuss the legal issues presented by all parties in an attempt to grant the Commissioners a fuller understanding of their role in the district formation process under C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-201, et secl. DISCUSSION As set forth by previous Memorandum, dated August 20, 1979, the Petitioners of the SVSD have filed the required number of copies of the Service Plan with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, together with the maximum permissible processing fee of $200. C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-204. Pursuant to statute, the Board of County Commissioners set a date (September 17, 1979) for a public hearing on the Service Plan. C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-208(1). The County Commissioners at such a hearing are required to hear evidence in support of the Service Plan and entertain questions and input from interested parties, designed to assist them in their required determinations of fact under C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-205. • 1 Memorandum September 21, 1979 Page 2 The criteria for approval, disapproval, or conditional approval by the County Commissioners is set forth at C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-205(1), to -wit: (a) There is insufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be serviced by the proposed 'district; or (b) The existing service in the area to be served by the proposed district is adequate for present and projected needs; or (c) Adequate service is, or will be, available to the area through municipal annex- ation by other existing municipal or quasi -municipal corporations within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis; or (d) The proposed special district is incapable of providing economical and sufficient service to the area within its proposed bound- aries; or (e) The area to be included in the proposed district does not have, or will not have, the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis; or (f) The facility and service standards of the proposed district are incompatible with the facility and service standards of adjacent municipalities and special districts. A deficiency in any one of the above -stated criteria will permit the Board of County Commissioners to either disapprove or conditionally approve the SVSD Service Plan. It is our opinion from a review of the aforementioned statutory criteria that the Board of County Commissioners, under C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-201, et seq., are without jurisdiction and power to disapprove or conditionally approve the SVSD Service Plan upon a requirement for the inclusion of additional lands within the proposed district's boundaries when such is not necessary to effectuate a positive finding under the statutory service plan criteria. Moreover, it is our considered opinion that no agreement or condition of approval designed to bind the Board of Directors of the proposed SVSD to negotiate the inclusion of additional lands within district boundaries would be binding and enforceable upon formation of the SVSD. The reason for our conclusion in this matter is the generally accepted principles that the promoters of an entity created by law cannot bind such to a course of conduct or vote determination prior to its formation. • • Memorandum September 21, 1979 Page 3 CONCLUSION The Board of County Commissioners are without power and jurisdiction to disapprove or conditionally approve the SVSD Service Plan on criteria other than those set forth in C.R.S. 1973, 32-1-205(a). The criteria for Service Plan review set forth in the Special District Control Act do not encompass a requirement to include additional lands within the proposed district's boundaries when full compliance with the aforementioned criteria exists after the conclusion of the review by the relevant Board of County Commissioners. Moreover, the petitioners of the proposed Spring Valley Sanitation District have incurred considerable delay and expense as a result of endeavors by their legal, engineering, and financial consultants to provide for the inclusion of the proposed Lake Springs development within the boundaries of the proposed district. It is the viewpoint of the petitioners of the proposed district that to require further extensive negotiations and engineering and bonding analyses required for the inclusion of additional lands within the proposed district would be to impose an undue hardship, particularly when the opportunity for inclusion was previously presented and declined. Finally, and most important, is the contractual requirement for the formation of the SVSD by January 3, 1980, as set forth in Paragraph 6 of the Sewage Treatment Services Agreement, between Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. and Colorado Mountain Junior College District, attached as Appendix A to the SVSD Service Plan. If, for any reason, the SVSD is not formed by January 3, 1980, the formation of a sewer district to serve the Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Colorado Mountain College, and other development in Spring Valley will be precluded. The inclusion of the Lake Springs development will require the preparation of a new Service Plan and new hearings; essentially, it will require the entire process to be reinstituted. It will be impossible to complete the formation of the SVSD prior to the aforementioned deadline if inclusion of additional lands is now required by the Commissioners. We would reiterate the only reason for the non-inclusion of the Lake Springs development within the boundaries of the proposed SVSD is due to the choice of the developers of Lake Springs. Furthermore, we are informed that Lake Springs' development plans are not sufficiently defined to permit the preparation of a revised SWSD Service Plan. r i • Memorandum September 21, 1979 Page 4 Therefore, for all the reasons stated, the Petitioners believe the best alternative is for the Commissioners to approve the SVSD Service Plan to permit Los Amigos Ranch and CMC to form the proposed district and allow Lake Springs to annex into the District after formation. • TELEPHONE 303-945-8571 WILLIAM D. JOCIIEMS ATTORNEY AT LAW 811 BLAKE AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 September 19, 1979 Mr, Nicholas R, Massaro Superintendant - Roaring Fork School District RE -1 1405 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: Los Amigos School Site Dear Mre Massaro: POST OFFICE BOX 195 Once again, the Subdividers of the Los Amigos Planned Unit Development tender an agreement to RE -1 for consideration. This time the Subdivider proposes to make the cash payment to the school district in lieu of the school site. I have not specified the amount of the cash payment, but what is intended is the usual formula of the market value of one acre for every 50 dwelling units. This is clearly legal, contemplated by both the statute and the County Ordinance and is in fact employed often by the school district. In addition, because the Subdividers genuinely desire a school on the subject property, this agreement provides for the school district to have an option to purchase the property from the Subdi- vider for the same price as the cash payment. If the school district did purchase the property, then the properties use would be limited as provided in the agreement for the purpose of building a school or schools and maintaining them, This solution would seem to satisfy everyone's objectives, The Subdivider would thus be assured that the school district would not take the property unless it really intended to build a school and the school district would have protection against inflation by being able to acquire the site at today's market value no matter when the school district elected to buy the property,_ At the Board Meeting on September 10, I sensed that the board would favorably consider such a proposal (although I understand they were not bound to do so) and that I was to work with the school district's attorney in the preparation of such an agreement. However, when I talked with Claire Green it was apparently not her understanding that she was to work with me towards this end, Accordingly, I have Mr, Nicholas R. Massaro September 19, 1979 Page two just mailed this to you directly without sending any copies to her or without consulting with her regarding the preparation thereof. Ver William D Jochems WDJ/bw cc: Mr. Robert Chatmas Sun Designs di ider intends hat said nro e F) (1.) >, >, Y 4 0) a a) >, 0) .o c0 0) OA a) O sac C C Y o Y Vn O pwV 0) LS .u) � dc. c.'CS > G V O V dCG OYO c C y snV 4] O'Ov)O . Is. O C ! 0ww iO O OO a)L.y r. w U l vc a 'tap)$ ast-:Eya�.Eh 45 p +� E a) Y 0 O p a:cn Y 'p V O C V> U O O 1 G3 to 'C p Y .b 0-2 iC S -Or Y .0 p V c0 L. p= .b vvi .. w V p p ■ to Cb . ' L'.552Y CO ° as '›' Z d 0. y' 0A O E L3,2 ro o v) E v v l p >, y O o w c U b c0 a)$ odc0p.. �Oa" ;."IS a) .-. .p U T3 V 'CS c0 'O w V .Q Y 0. c0 ".y .i;•", c0 CL -8 4 a 3 y o Ne ® O b E •c. O V 3 ai $: ssCI) c 0 >1 "CJ O eo y cu to .t.4:74. p 0 R Y�U� . a)> 0,0 y O c> C..) 6.4...a C c, a) 0 ,:e, > O co O y a ..+ C w +•..beRf p �pyb5 : /8 72 co 11 V O '� .., .�..• ,,-,a) =cu a) > n 3 3 p v ■ v) a) o O•p E o ,_ Y 1. c0 C'-' a)E as > n o 0 3 i.3 a c0 bC• E p 0) .0 aa)) � � � 3 -O ccs E" " ;_,0 .ca oCO1 v 0) 3'° i . rd 'n a) a o rVn yw cA v>) C , E IV OO le O+�'OCVz y0pM0A.mEa3a) . c,?, , 0 ,., ,.... s.., 0) C.) 0)(2) 4.) ii. V Y l 4. as 44 pa, c -0, w0 Y 1...,o E o >, Qsw.3 )a) .c4 az 7, al p O a) pO6p3 • a�'iNa>i CO O ms •Igl U 5 O +� x c0 O en y y C 00 �Vp8.004)�� v� � o> a Loll CDa0 0 a) v -0 asw I 0 p as p cu > ytw`" a) E U o R __ w rn w C O c. p c0 1.1 t a .5 > C w a) c0 w p a) w' s. G7 � o b Y � `E O ,C p Y O O moo. 0 Ev aai� wo �ai) p� 00) s: v ° c� c. o o y y 0 b U p.E p cc"0'v) c0 w v :-. w Y p Q) w w w y Y o v o 00 ° a3i0= ;� .s"'., 00 M ) C G " Y o 'C v mE •a. ,, O0 '18 .ro .. `s `" i n, c. a) a) 3 b wc. :›% 1., aRQ m w i cn 6 >' c ..0 'Cs a) t CD W c0 0 "5 O Y a y -0 p O 1-. c. o 0. p •.E 0, ,,- ^ a) f3 p, cn aa) 0 i z C ca w. 0. G c,0 _s:E� p»�Vapi.E0). > O 3, .p •� E '007 .*y V .0 5 c0 C _ , , .. to - y • au°) > 0) *El a`'i� av>i a>) 0E" U p uv) - w Uy'L7.. ,.= G. • 0 0 , v p >, tn•o >' >,m oyes &.-S pPc/ s: E O '= O3y0-. 0.Y coO3• .o Rp 0 0 w ' O0 OE -a O bD R 0. .0 0 " O p L 0b��=.p. > VY"cp UrG p U Y a) 0 . d m ❑ h >,n u)ad o o el °' 0) Eco. HE'43s.ctvc>- i so p c. p V w c0 Ti, c. v Y Y c0 0 ..., c0 v Q. Roaring Fork School District RE -1 P. O. Box 820 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone (303) 945-6558 September. 26, 1979 Gan6ie.ed County Comnli,daionets Gan6ieed County Count Hou4e G.eenwood Sp'L cnga , Co.eon.ado 81601 den. Comm,i.aaioneta : NICHOLAS R. MASSARO, Superintendent DWIGHT L. HELM, Assistant Superintendent WALLACE M. PARKER, Assistant Superintendent, Business 7 1979 • I, rivefe At the neguean meeting the Rocvct.ng Faith Schoo.e Viat&ict Board ob Education, heed September. 24, 1979, ,the Baand met again with nepneaentatLvea oi6 the Loa A Lgoa development project -to conai.den .theic tatea-t pnopoaed agreement. Arlen di.4cusa.ion, the 6ottowLng motion waa made and unani.moua.ey approved: Motion by Mn. Thueaon - 1 move .that the Schoo.e Board aah .the Board o6 County Comm,i,azioneru to Aequeat Land 1Aom Loa Arn.go4 -Ln the amount hen.etobone nequea-ted, thin -teen acnes, and ,they zone .the Land .in Ouch manner and 6a2h..on a3 they deem Aequi ed by taw. Seconded by Mn. Hoiden. !/ole: Aye - DA. Vewett, M. Haden, M44. Magg.ione, Mn,a . Schmid and Mn. Thueaon. The Board vLewa the pnopet lcj deset ibed .in attachment Exhibit "A" as a deai ib.ee po.ten-tLa.e achoo.e site needed .in the butun.e. S-Lncene(„ /[.A)ey /y1Oona, i/\ /1 •yl /+ r�� / Nicho.eaa R. Mcuaan.o ht Fnctoaune cc: Ray Ba.edw.in, County Hanna JOHN D. MUSICK, JR. STEPHEN T. WILLIAMSON ALAN E. SCHWARTZ LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH JOSEPH A. COPE SUE ELLEN HARRISON WILLIAM T. SMITH, JR. KEVIN L. PATRICK JAMES S. LOCHHEAD • MUSICK, WILLIAMSON, SCHWAR LEAVENWORTH & COPE, Y.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 75 MANHATTAN DRIVE — SUITE 1 P.O. BOX 4579 BOULDER, COLORADO 80306 TELEPHONE (303) 499-3990 (COLO) 1-800 332-2140 September 21, 1979 Glenwood Springs Arthur A. A. Abplanalp, Esq. Garfield County Attorney P. 0. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 SEP 2 1979 L_ ❑IYiU ILLI) Li GLENWOOD SPRINGS OFFICE 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO. 81601 TELEPHONE (303) 945-2261 (COLO) 1-800 332-6955 Re: Proposed Spring Valley Sanitation District Dear Art: Enclosed for your review is a Memorandum addressing some of the issues and concerns the Commissioners and Ray Baldwin raised at the September 17, 1979, public hearing. Please feel free to call Lee Leavenworth or me prior to the October 1, 1979 public hearing if you would care to discuss these matters further. Very truly yours, MUSICK, WILLIAMSON, SCHWARTZ, LEAVENWORTH & COPE P.C. 1 By KLP:jaw Enc. cc: Robert W. Chatmas (w/enc.) Dean K. Moffatt (w/enc.) William L. Lorah (w/enc.) Thomas Bishop, Esq. (w/enc.) t, -Ry Baldwin (w/enc.) Kevin L. Patrick