Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application1 1 I reZr PrA Resource Management inc. 1 1 1 APPLICATION FOR 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION NUMBER TWO LOS AMIGOS RANCH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 February 17, 19$2 1 1 1111 .1 1 • 11. Resource Management inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subdivision Number Two Preliminary Plat Application LOS AMIGOS RANCH VOLUME ONE PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SUBDIVISION SUMMARY FORM 3 III. BASIC INFORMATION 4 IV. PHYSICAL INFORMATION A. GEOLOGY 9 B. SOILS 13 C. VEGETATION 14 D. WILDLIFE 14 V. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 16 VI. UTILITY PLAN A. WATER 19 B. SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL 22 C. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 23 MAPS M1 VICINITY MAP M2 PRELIMINARY PLAT M3 GEOLOGY M4 SOILS M5 SLOPE M6 VEGETATION 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 A . ' I Ek) Resource Management inc. irem•••••••• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOS AMIGOS RANCH SUBDIVISION NO. TWO I. INTRODUCTION This application requests approval of Subdivision Number Two Preliminary Plat of the Los Amigos Ranch, Planned Unit Development (PUD). Subdivision No. One con- sists of the 96 unit Auburn Ridge apartment complex on 14.63 acres across County Road 114 from Colorado Mountain College. Subdivision Number Two contains 201.6 acres and con- sists of 53 single-family lots. The design and layout of Subdivision Number Two is consistent with the PUD Master Plan which was approved by the Garfield County Commission- ers in Resolution No. 81-358 on Tuesday, December 1, 1981. Subdivision Number Two represents a resubdivision of the initial Subdivision Number Two, of which Final Plat, Filing One was recorded on March 3, 1980. Ir addition, this resub- division will render null and void the Subdivision Improvements Agreement which was recorded on March 5, 1980. Following approval of the preliminary plat, the final platting of Subdivision Two will take place in three sep- arate phases or filings as follows: Phase One Phase Two Phase Three 10 lots 25 lots 18 lots 53 lots The timing for application of phase one, final plat approv- al will occur shortly after preliminary plat approval. The timing of subsequent applications for phases two and three has not been established at this time. This application is in two separate bound reports and I a separate set of drawings. The first report contains the application, the preliminary plat maps and written mater- ial. The second report contains proposed Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Design. Requirements and Guide - II lines as required in the subdivision process. The separate set of drawings also includes the official plat and addi- tional supporting technical maps and drawings specified in IIthe Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. (il 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Resource Management inc. 1 1 1 1 Preparation of the Preliminary Plat Application was the responsibility of Resource Managment, Inc. Schmueser and Associates, Engineers and Lincoln-DeVore Engineers also participated in preparation of the application. II. SUBDIVISION SUMMARY FORM Garfield County Type of Subdivision: Request for Exemption Date 2/16/82 Preliminary Plan XX Final Plat Subdivision Name: Filing Los Amigos Ranch Location of Subdivision: TOWNSHIP 7 RANGE 88 SEC. 5 & E 1/2 6 Owner(s) NAME Thomas E. Neal & James A.R. Johnson ADDRESS c/o Los Amigos Ranch, Box 1506, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Subdivider(s) NAME Malcolm Wall ADDRESS Same as above . Designer NAME Resource Management , Inc . ADDRESS P.O. Box 11536 , Aspen , Co 81612 Number of Type of Subdivision Dwelling Units Area % of (Acres) Total Area (0 Single Family 53 Apartments ( ) Condominiums ( ) Mobile Home ( ) Commercial N.A. ( ) Industrial N.A. 161.1 79.9. Street 21.2 10.5 Walkways Dedicated School Sites Reserved School Sites Dedicated Park Sites Reserved Park Sites Private Open Areas 5.4 2.7 Easements 13.9 6.9 Other (specify) Total 201.6 100% Estimated Water Requirements 43,670 Gallons/day Proposed Water Source Wells (ground water) Estimated Sewage Disposal Requirement 10,500 Gallons/day Proposed Means of Sewage Disposal Septic tank/Spring Valley San. District ACTION: Planning Commission Recommendation Approval ( ) Disapproval ( ) Remarks Date , 19 . Board of County Commissioners Approval ( ) Disapproval ( ) Remarks Date , 19 3. 1 1 Resource Management inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III. BASIC INFORMATION (4.02.01; K.1-9) A. Subdivision Name: Los Amigos Ranch B. Owner: Thomas E. Neal James A.R. Johnson Address: c/o Los Amigos Ranch P.O. Box 1506 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (303) 945-9797 C. Organization preparing the preliminary plat: Resource Management, Inc. P.O. Box 11536 Aspen, CO 81612 (303)925-6615 D. Adjacent owners' names and address: 1. W.K.P., Inc., P.O. Box 1796, Aspen, Colorado 81612. 2. Lyons, Harold R. & Marianne E., 4206 100 road, Carbondale, Colorado 81623. 3. Herring, Albert T. & Marie A., 0596 County Road 113, Carbondale, Colorado 81623. 4. Becker, Charles J., 0670 266 Road, Rifle, Colorado 81650. 5. Hall, Jack L. & Naomi E., Box 606, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. 6. Reynolds, William & Renwen, Inc., Box 1666, Boulder, Colorado 80302. 7. Dodson, Stanley L., Box 248, 0033 Marand Road, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. 8. Mobile Assoc., Box X, Basalt, Colorado 81621. 9. Scott lard Ltd., Suite 103 First National Bank Building, Pueblo, Colorado 81003. 10. Dunkel, Lenore E., 2203 Bennett Avenue, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. 11. Scottland Ltd., Suite 103 First National Bank Building, Pueblo, Colorado 81003. 12. Hue Mart Corporation, 6822 Highway 82, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. 13. Fuller, Mary Lynn & John Jr., 0575 West Bank Road, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, 81601. 14. Rogers, Diane. Marie, 1836 E. 8th Avenue, Mesa, Arizona 85201. 15(a). Slaterley, William R. & Judith J., Rt. 1 Box 139, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. 1 I 1:7; 19 zi Resource Management inc. 15(b). Sorenson, Gordon C. & Margaret J., Box 786, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601. 15(c). Boyles, Jake 0. & Evelyn F., 6296 Highway 82, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 51601. 15(d). Coryell, patrick B., 6931 State Highway 82, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 51601. 16. Crull, Dennis R. & Penny K., Box 610, Glenwood Springs Colorado 81601. 17. Ryman, Richard W., 4728 154 Road, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, 81601. 18. Witte, Eddie C.J. & Leola M., 4698 County Road 154, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 19. Smith, Charles C. & Barbara A., 5633 W. County. Road #52E, Bellvue, Colorado 80512. 20. Hughes, David J. & Norma R., 2558 Highway Springs, Colorado 81601. 21. Kirkham, Analee, 4602 County Road 154, Colorado 81601. 22. Kirkham, Analee, 4602 County Road 154, Colorado 81601. 23. Rose, James L, Box 566, Glenwood Springs, 81601. 24. Jammaron, Leo, 4915 Highway Colo9rado 81601. 25. Jackson, Carter T. & Louise Springs, Colorado 81601. 26. Ould, A.W., c/o George William Ould, N. 1929 Barker Road, Greenacres, Washington 99016. 27. Ould, A.W., c/o George William Ould, N. 1929 Barker Road, Greenacres, Washington 99016. 28. Land changing hands. 29. Kindall, Harmon H. 30. Kindall, Harmon H. 31. Kindall, Harmon H. 32. Miller, Moffatt, Van Pelt, Main, Bier. 33. Ould, William George, North 1929 Barker Road, Greenacres, Washington 99016. 34. Foster Petroleum, Box 729, Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003. 35. Foster Petroleum, Box 729, Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003. 36. Foster Petroleum, Box 729, Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003. 37. Colorado Mountain College. 38. BLM. 39. BLM. 82, Glenwood Glenwood Glenwood Springs, Springs, Colorado 82, Glenwood Springs, Van K., Box 1137, Glenwood 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Resource Management inc. E. Uses, Acreages: Single-family 161.1 acres Streets & Roads 21.2 acres Utility Easements 13.9 acres Recreation/ Greenbelt/ Open Space 79.9% of total area. 10.5% of total area. 6.9% of total area. 5.4 acres 2.7% of total area. F. Terms of public use dedications: Streets in Los Amigos Ranch Subdivision Number Two will be publi�� dedicated roads. There are no public dedication sites in Subdivision Number Two. G. Terms of Proposed Covenants - Los Amigos Ranch will be gov- erned by Declarations of Protective Covenants, and physical development will be regulated by the Los Amigos Ranch Design Requirements and Guidelines of which draft copies are included in this application. H. Zoning Compliance - as per Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. Zoning District Map and Area and Bulk Requirements ZONE DISTRICT MAP SUBDIVISION #2 1. Permitted/Additional Uses: Regulated by Building Single -Family Dwellings Permits Accessory Uses -- Churches, community Services, Nursery, School Site, Home Occupation as Conditional. 2. Minimum Lot Area: 65,000 Sq.Ft.(1.5 acres) Maximum Lot Coverage: 10% (6500 Sq.Ft.) Setbacks --to be specified at time of final plat by designating building envelopes. Height --30 feet. Smallest Lot in Subd. 65,000 Sq.Ft.(1.5 acres) Regulated by Building Permits To be specified on final plat Regulated by Building Permits 6 1 lg Resource Management inc. Maximum Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 (for structure) to 1.0 (lot size) Regulated by Building Permits I. Amount of non-residential floor space --none. J. Number of non -single family residential. off-street parking spaces --none. 7 11)7A �II Resource Management inc. IV. PHYSICAL INFORMATION (4.02.03) A. Geology --Prepared by Lincoln DeVore as follows. B. Soils --Prepared by Lincoln DeVore as follows. C. Vegetation --Prepared by Resource Management and based on information from the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as follows. D. Wildlife --Prepared by Resource Management and based on information from the Colorado Division of Wildlife as follows. 8 <;t ,.:.'...._,..,.. Styr" F�C•+ Lincoln DeVore 1000 West Fillmore St. Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 (303) 632-3593 Home Office Los Amigos Ranch P.O. Box 1506 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 ATTN: Malcom Wall February 5, 1982 Re: File No. GS -740 Preliminary Geologic Hazards Investigation for Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Wall: Personnel of Lincoln-DeVore completed a preliminary geologic hazard site inspection on the above referenced property on September 5, 1978, in order to identify and define geologic and soils constraints which may effect the development. A set of three maps were prepared in connection with this report. The set of three maps were based on a regional study done by Lincoln-DeVore for Garfield County in 1975 under the provisions of Colorado House Bill 1041. The House Bill 1041 mapping was amended and added to, to prepare the set of maps for this site, but the set of three maps which accompany this study must still be considered as preliminary in nature. The three maps are: Plate I - Preliminary Geologic Map; Plate II - Preliminary Soils Hazards Zone Map and; Plate III - Preliminary Slope Hazard, Floodway and Stability Map. The scope of this present work consisted of 1) the tracing of the Preliminary Geologic Map to a new topographic base map, and 2) the re -issuance of the original letter (dated September 14, 1978) describing the geology and hazards of the site. No addi- tional site reconnaissance was conducted. Geologically the site could be described as an upland mesa, formed by basalt flows (Tb) (see Plate I) which were extruded during the down cutting of the Roaring Fork Valley. These flows covered the.Maroon Formation (PPm) (see Plate I), a thick sequence of red interbedded sandstones, siltstones, and shales which can be seen outcropping along the southwestern edge of the site. The basalt flows also partially covered the Eagle Valley Evaporite (Pev) in the southern portion of the site. The Eagle Valley Evaporite locally consists of white to grey gypsum with widely spaced fine grained sandstones and dark grey shales. Colorado 9 Pueblo, Colorado Grand Junction, Colorado Glenwood Springs, Colorado Evanston, Wyoming Los Amigos Ranch February 5, '1982 Page -2- The following discussion of the engineering considerations of these three formations is general in nature. The Eagle Valley Evaporite (Pev) has undergone several types of deformation which has resulted in a typical chaotic internal structure. The contortion and deformation of the incompetent materials of this formation dictates that wherever it is exposed it must be considered as potentially unstable. Other hazards associated with this formation include potential solution, hydro - compaction and the presence of corrosive minerals. The Maroon Formation (PPm) is highly fractured and, therefore, easily eroded which provides an excellent source of material for rockfall and debris flows when exposed on steep slopes. These hazards are only present along the steep valley sides on the west and southwest boundary of the site. Soils derived from the Maroon formation may be susceptible to potential subsidence and hydrocompaction. The basalt flows (Tb), which underlie the majority of the site, are dark grey, highly fractured, vesicular basalts attaining several hunderd feet in thickness. The major hazard associated with the basalt is rockfall which is present on the steeper slo- pes below the cliff -like palisades along the Roaring Fork Valley in the west and southwest edges of the site,.and along the outcrops near the eastern boundary. Another large rockfall area is present in the south central portion of the site just north of the Colorado Mountain College access road. Another slope stability problem in the presence of a moderate sized landslide (Qls) was noted at the base of the palisade bet- ween the two major drainage gullies just north of where they intersect. This slide appears fairly old and moderately stable but, without specific analysis, should be considered potentially unstable. The palisades which occur throughout the proposed development area should be considered as potentially unstable and a minimum set- back from the edges for buildings should be established prior to construction. The basalt bedrock appears to outcrop or be present at a shallow depth throughout the majority of the site and wherever it is encountered close to the surface will affect both construction and excavation and may require blasting for removal. The shallow bedrock is highly fractured and permeable, which will affect the potential for individual septic systems and may necessitate the use of a central septic system. 10 Amigos Ranch February 5, 1982 Page -3- Surficial deposits mapped as colluvium (Qc) have potential hazards which are dependent on the formations from which they are derived and their modes of deposition. Colluvium, derived from the Maroon formation, is mainly gravity transported and will be susceptible to potential subsidence due to hydrocompaction only, whereas colluvium derived from the Eagle Valley Evaporite will be susceptible to solution, hydrocompaction and the presence of corrosive minerals. Alluvial deposits mapped as terraces (Qt1_2) consist mainly of well rounded sands and gravels and have no inherent hazards except where they overlie incompetent members of the Eagle Valley Evaporite, which could cause them to be potentially unstable. Sands and gravels also make up the deposit which surrounds the Roaring Fork River labeled (QAL). The alluvial deposit mapped as (QAL) in the eastern part of the site, however, consists mainly of sand, silt and clay deposited by stream action. Expansive clays and/or consolidating silts may be encountered in this eastern alluvial area. Another geologic feature mapped as an alluvial fan (Qf) was noted just south of the site but will not affect the proposed developement. Two major gullies and several minor ones were inspected to deter- mine their potential for flooding and debris flows. The evidence indicates that significant stream flow in most of the gullies will exist only during and after torrential rains. The upper part of the drainage basins are fairly flat, cultivated, and cross the highly fractured and permeable basalt flows which tends to reduce runoff to a level far below that which would normally be expected; however, the potential for flooding within the gullies does exist and has been mapped as floodways (fw) (see Plate III). The lower part of the drainages become fairly steep and contain considerable quantities of debris. Close inspection of these gullies revealed no recent debris flow activity, and actually very little potential for debris flows. In all the areas of the proposed development which are located on the uplands, the flood hazard to those areas is almost nonexistent. There is a potential for hazards to exist for any roads and dams placed in the area of the gullies; these must be designed for the relevant peak flows and channel configurations. Site specific studies are recommended in areas of proposed construction which contain geologic hazards, at which time speci- fic mitigation procedures can be outlined. The following legend summarizes the geologic units included on the Preliminary Geologic map. 11 Amigos Ranch February 5, 1982 Page -4- Qal Qc ALLUVIUM (Quaternary) Stream deposited material. Sand and gravel along Roaring Fork River; sand, silt, and clay in eastern portion of site. COLLUVIUM (Quaternary) Gravity transported hillside deposits, including coalescing debris fans. (Qf) Qls LANDSLIDE (Quaternary) Qt1, 2 Tb PPm TERRACE GRAVELS (Quaternary, subscripts indicate relative age, 1 is younger) Old stream deposits lying above present day water levels. BASALT FLOWS (Tertiary) Dark grey, olivine basalt, hard, vesicular, columnar jointing in places, commonly fractured, weathered surfaces, brownish. MAROON FORMATION (Permian - Pennsylvanian) Reddish, arkosic sandstone with siltstone, claystone, and some conglomerate and limestone, current depositional structures common. Pev EAGLE VALLEY EVAPORITE (Pennsylvanian) Gypsum and dark grey shale, and mixtures of silt and salt; chaotic internal structure, yellowish -grey weathered surfaces, susceptibleto erosion and solution. This description of the geologic characteristics of the site is still applicable. If there are any questions please contact Lincoln-DeVore at any time. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LAB., INC. By: Joh' W. im elrei 4, Prof-ssional Geolog.it 4, By: Michael T. Weaver Professoinal Geologist JWH/ llm 12 1 r 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 5: Lincoln DeVore 1000 Wes! FilImorn St Colorado Sarongs, Colorado 80907 (3031632-3593 Home Ottrce Summary of Preliminary Percolation Tests Completed by Lincoln-DeVore on May 27, 1.979 Rate Test Number Minutes Per. Inch Notes 1 75 Stiff Clay 2 10 Basalt at 9 feet 3 45 Basalt at 7 feet 4 40 Silty Clay 5 15 Clayey Sand Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. By: �.�! / _ ( /1, ,,,�. Michael T. Weaver/ Professional .Geologist MTW/kmp 210(1 1.41101way 5:) West PufitIO. Coll) 8;00:i (303) 546.1 150 • P t� f.k„ t4?7 Giunwuu'i Sit+niys. Gcdo 81601 (303) 945-6020 13 109 (-Iry ,hunt Plaza Monlru ;t,, Colo 81401 (303) 249-7838 PO fox 188,2 Grand Junction, Colo 81501 (303) 242 8068 r P O. t3ox 1643 Hock Springs. Wyo 82901 (307) 382-2649 Resource Management inc. C. VEGETATION: The Los Amigos Ranch property con- tains agriculturally related plant materials and native vegetation consisting of pinion/juniper, sage and meadow grasses. Over half of the Los Amigos land is pinion/juniper. To avoid exposing development to public views by locating in open meadows, most of the single-family units are lo- cated within the pinion/juniper zone. Losses of the pinion/juniper cover are kept to a minimum by limiting building areas to 3000 square feet and aligning roads to as near natural grade as poss- ible. In addition, utilities are intended to be underground and located in common easements aligned next to roads. Areas of existing native vegetation, includ- ing pinion/ juniper, sage and meadow grass, if outside a building site and regardless of owner- ship, are protected against removal or impacts such as would be caused by the keeping of horses - see Draft Master Declaration of Protective Covenants - SectionXIII. D. WILDLIFE: Wildlife conditions on the Los Amigos Ranch Property, particularly the area incorporated in Subdivison Number Two, were investigated by Mr. Rick Adams of the Colorado Division of Wildlife. His site investigation took place during the first week of February 1982, and the pertinent points of his conclusions on wildlife conditions and impacts from development follow. Current ac- curate mapping of wildlife characteristics is not available, and since the HB 1041 wildlife maps are out of date, maps have not been included in this application. 1. An estimated 300 mule deer winter in and around the Los Amigos Ranch property. Twenty- one deer were actually seen on the site inspection. 2. Sage Grouse likely winter in the areas where sagebrush is prevalent, although, they are not as numerous as in the past. 14 1 Resource Management inc. 1 1 3 The area is not known to host any endangered species. 4. Recommendations to accompany development approval. a. Discourage construction of fences. If fences are built, maintain a maximum height of 42 inches, and the top of the fence should be wood (or other material that would not harm wildlife jumping over fences) . b. Discourage the use of non -indigenous land- scaping plants. Wildlife often seek out these plants for food and eventually de- stroy the plants. Purchasers of property in Los Amigos should be advised of this liability to non -indigenous plants. c. Establish strict and enforceable measures to control the dangers to wildlife from dogs. Dogs should not be allowed to roam free and should be. under their owners' control at all times when outside. d. Discourage livestock (horses, cattle, goats, domestic fowl). The vegetation available to wildlife will diminish con- siderably if livestock are allowed in the development. These points are addressed in the Declaration of Protective Covenants. IYAAI 1 Resource Management inc. V. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (4.02.04) The Grading and Drainage Plan which follows was pre- pared by Schmueser and Associates. 16 GRADING AND DRAINAGE REPORT PRELIMINARY PLAN - SUBDIVISION 2 � M. G0R9 LOS AMIGOS RANCH Prepared by: Dean W. GorP �. SCHMUESER & AS OC,I,ATE ON, a N z� J F ��, yw Date: February 10, 1982 The purpose of this report is to discuss the preliminary grading and drainage concepts as shown on the drawings included with this application and in compliance with Section 4.02.04 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: a.) There will be no overlot grading on any of the lots or open space. The only grading that will occur will be as required for road construction and will be contained wholly within the road right-of-way. Road cuts and typical sections are shown on the road plan and profile sheets. b.) With the large lots and rural nature of the entire Subdivision, all lots have been able to be designed with at least a portion of their boundary that abuts the roadway with cuts or fills of less than three feet. That is, the vertical alignment of the road has been kept very close to the original ground contours. There are basically no lots that will require large cuts or fills at driveway access points or drawings with excessive grades. c.) All street profiles are shown on the road plan and profile drawings. d.) The pertinent information relating to drainage is presented in tabular form on the Drainage Plan. Runoff from precipita- tion is to be conveyed by road ditches and natural drainage channels. All major drainage channels will remain in their natural states except for roadway crossings. All culverts are sized to pass the 10 -year storm event. The 10 -year and 100 -year peak discharge were calculated at each roadway crossing using the Soil Conservation Service Manual "Peak Flows in Colorado", which includes Technical Release No. 55, "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds", dated March, 1980. Peak flows of the developed property will remain nearly identical to the undeveloped condition SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 17 because of the low density of development, large amount of undisturbed open space and the use of natural drainage channels. e.) Consistant with the P.U.D. approval, improvements to County Road 114 or a contribution of $32,700 in lieu of those im- provements is to be made during construction of Filing 3, Subdivision 2. Those improvements are subject to approval of the Road Supervisor and will be designed and deliniated prior to the actual construction of improvements. SA SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Resource Management inc. VI. UTILITY PLAN (4.02.06) The Utility Plan and report which follows was prepared by Schmueser and Associates. UTILITY REPORT PRELIMINARY PLAN - SUBDIVISION 2 LOS AMIGOS RANCH Prepared by: Dean W. Gordon, P. SCHMUESER & ASSOCIAIV Date: February 10, 1982 •• N-q3ti,/� �� tN. �l C ��J} The purpose of this report is to discuss the preliminary utility system concepts as depicited on the utility drawings included with this appli- cation and in compliance with Section 4.02.06 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. A. Water Supply The water system will be a phased extension of the existing system which serves the apartment units. The system consists of the following: - Well No. 5 and Well No. 6, both drilled deep wells. - Treatment building consisting of chlorination equipment, pressure tanks, and electrical controls. - Distribution system as shown on the plans. The system will be expanded in phases to serve the three filings of Subdivision 2 as follows: - Filing 1: The existing system is designed to serve 96 apartment units. Only 48 units are now built leaving an available system capacity equivalent to the 48 unbuilt units. Essentially the water system will be expanded by extension of the distribution network to serve Lots 1-10, Filing 1. The 10 lots are equal to about 20 apartment units, hence the system will have sufficient capacity to serve these lots. - Filing 2: The high pressure zone will be created as a result of this filing. To expand the system, in addition to the water network being extended, the water storage tank and two (2) pressure regulating stations must be constructed, modifications to the treatment facility will be required (removal of the pressure tanks and changing of the electrical controls) and Well No. 5 will be abandoned. These changes will put the entire system on a gravity pressure system with two pressure zones. st SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 20 - Filing 3: The distribution system will be extended to serve Lots 1-10 and Lots 11-18. In addition, a cistern will be installed to provide a source of water for fire protection for Lots 14-18. The design parameters for the water system at the various phases are as follows: Average day Peak day Peak hour Demand Demand Demand Storage Existing 36,330 gpd 76 gpm 150 gpm N/A Filing 1 26,560 gpd 55 gpm 110 qpm N/A Filing 2 55,000 gpd 115 gpm N/A 235,000 gal. Filing 3 80,000 gpd 166 gpm N/A 260,000 gal. The above table is based on a domestic demand of 100 gpc/d and an irrigation demand of 2.5 Af/A over 160 days. Because of the close proximity of Lots 17-20, Filing 2 to the water storage tank, the water pressure will not be adequate. These units will require an in-house booster pump to provide additional pressure. The pressure at the fire hydrants serving these lots will be less than 20 psi residual. The usual requirement for 20 psi residual at a hydrant has a two -fold basis, first to prevent negative pressures in the system during pumping and second, to provide adequate water supply to the hydrant during pumping. Both of these requirements will be met in this case because the hydrant is located very near the tank on the 10" main. For fire flows up to 750 gpm, there will be positive pressure in the system and adequate delivery of water to the fire pumping equipment. All of the lots, from Lots 13-18, Filing 3, to the west, will be on a rural water distribution system. The 3" line will be adequate for domestic and lawn irrigation use. Cisterns will be provided at strategic locations and connected to the system to provide a source of water for fire protection. These cisterns will be 10,000 gallons in size and will be installed in such a way so as to be filled automatically. 1.) Source a., b., and c.) Water rights ownership is addressed in a letter dated February 2, 1982, from Nelson, Hoskin, Groves & Prinster, attorneys for the applicant. The letter and the attachments indicate that there are sufficient legal, decreed water rights available for this development. SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 21 d.) Well No. 6 has been test pumped in excess of 300 gpm and Well No. 5 has been test pumped in excess of 100 gpm and provide adequate yield for all filings of Subdivision 2. The water source will be constructed by the developer. The physical operation of the system is described above. e.) The water sources have been in use for three (3) years, servicing the existing apartment units. The water has met all testing requirements of the State Health Department for both chemical and bacteriological parameters. 2.) Ownership The water system will be owned and operated by the developer. The developer will construct and finance all capital improve- ments. 3.) The existing system is described above. 4.) No -individual water systems are planned; all units will be connected to the central water system. 5.) The water supply has been decreed by the Water Court, evidence of which is contained in the before mentioned legal opinion. B. Sanitatary Sewage Disposal 1.) Central Sanitary Sewage Facilities. Those lots which will be serviced by the Spring Valley Sanitation District are as follows: Filing 1: Lots 1-5 Filing 2: Lots 1-25 Filing 3: None The collection system is shown on the utility drawings. The entire system will be gravity with the exception of the service to Lots 2 and 3, Filing 2. Portions of the possible building sites on these lots are located some 15' below road surface. Because of the rock conditions on deep cuts, it will be nec- essary for these units to have small lift pumps in the dwelling units to lift wastewater into the gravity system. The design criteria for single family units, as per the Spring Valley Sanitation District Service Plan, is 350 gpd/unit. Total design flow is therefore 10,500 gpd. Those lots which are to SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 22 be served by the District are within the boundaries of the Sanitation District. a.) Treatment will be provided by the Spring Valley Sanita- tion District. Adequate capacity exists at the existing facilities. A letter from the Sanitation District is attached. b.) Upon completion, the wastewater collection system will be deeded to the Spring Valley Sanitation District. The developer will be responsible for the cost of the design and construction of all utilities. c.) The collection system to serve Subdivision 2 will be an extension of the existing collection system of the Spring Valley Sanitation District. All lines in the system are 8" diameter and have been sized to accomodate the built out density proposed for the District, including this submittal. 2.) Industrial Sewage Disposal System. Those lots which will be served by individual sewage disposal systems are as follows: Filing 1: Lots 6-10 Filing 2: None Filing 3: Lots 1-18 The investigative reports done by Lincoln Devore indicate that while the lots in this subdivision most likely have favor- able conditions for standard septic tank/ieachfield systems, logicalized geologic conditions may require engineered systems. At the time a specific building site and disposal area can be located on the ground, percolation and site condition infor- mation will be gathered in accordance with State and Garfield County code requirements, and the final design of the individual systems will be made. C. Underground Utilities. Utilities will consist of telephone and electric service and possibly gas service. Standard front, side and rear lot easements are to be reserved for utility placement. It is anticipated that the utilities would be placed in the road right-of-way adjacent to the lots and the utility companies will confirm this through review agency comments. Underground utilities have not been shown on the drawings. The°developer will make a decision at the start of construction of each Filing as to the economic viability of qas service. As such, no decision on qas service to specific areas of the development has been made at this time. SA SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 23 1 1 i February 9, 1982 1: It it Mr. Malcolm Wall Los Amigos Ranch Partnership P.O. Box 1506 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 RE: Subdivision 2 Los Amigos Ranch 1 1 1! SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES 201 CENTENNIAL STREET SUITE 306 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (303) 945-5468 Dear Malcolm: The Spring Valley Sanitation District presently has sufficient capacity at the existing aerated lagoon treatment facilities to service the 30 single family lots in Subdivision 2. This is based on the present hydraulic loading on the facility and the District's prior commitment to service the existing CMC physical plant. Sincerely, SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES, INC. ZR` Dean . Gordon, Distri t Engineer Spring Valley Sanitation District DWG/1n Project # B1559A 24