Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 ISDS Correspondence{} nc LOS AMIGOS RANCH DESIGN "'O a A. Purqoses The purpose of the Design standards is to establish advanced design practices which shall apply to the installation of onsite waste water treatment systems ("systems")' The purpose of the Management plan is to provide effective management and operation of the systems. The Management iri". pr*io"s'.a.t,rnolng mechanism for inspections and routine maintenance of the Systemr. 'it ,r!o provided mectrinisms to insure that necessary repair or repracement of the systems i. p"rrorm"d in a timety'manner. The Management pran is not intended to provide roi "orrirn ownership of the systems, nor to provide common funding for construction' repair or replacement of the Systems' B. Responsibitity For Desian Staodards And Manaoe'ment Plan TheDesignStandardsandu,ffi[Gn"responsibilityoftheLosAmigosRanch Homeowners Association, lnc. (the "Association"f. The Architectural Review committee of the Association will be responsible for insuring that systerii "onit*.tion conforms to the Design Standards' The Association shall retain . qr"titi"a ;peratoi to perform inspections and routine maintenance and to advise the Association wnen pu*ping, repair or replacement of a System is necessary' c' ffiro"iation sha[ adjust it's Architectural Review fees3li:T::^1y]:.flilii:.Tplementation of the Design standards in tre initial construaion or svsiemi. rn" Association will collect, as a yearly fee' sufficient funds to pay for the firr;;;ld rouiin; ;;intenance of systems and administration of the Management plan. The necessary pumping, *pri, or replacement oi the systems' as determined by the nssoclation in its sore air"rution in"it o" inl-ourii"tion and financiai responsibility of each individual homeowner' D. Desion Standards systems ,n"-n *ntorm to the following specifications wherever practically feasible' 1. Tanks - All septic tanks shall be sized for a minimum of four bedrooms' All tanks shall have effiuent filters at the ouflet and provide for dosing oi In" "urorption field. The top of tanks or risers shall be within 4 inches of-G-surface to allow pumping of all chambers' 2. Treatment - All systems shall utilize Trickling Filters to lower BOD, suspended solids and nitrate levels. 3. Fields - All absorption fields shall be sized for a minimum of three bedrooms' Trench segments with at least 6 feet of separation in"il be used *h;il;, practically feasible' A minimum of three similarty sized trencfr ,.grlnG should ue instattea witr aitemating values or a distribution box that allons isolation of each segment. Monitoring_;G;-.4* te insta'itea at the far end of each trench segment to allow inrp""fion of field conoltionl - ir " u"o must be used a single dosed zone is acceptable. lf mounding ir-[qri*o to estaurisn'i t*t "t 3yit u9 soil, a single Press!]P dosed zone is acceptable. lf a bed or mound is used, a minimum of two monitoring p-ipes shall be installed at the far end of the bed or mound' E..ffipectionsshallbeperformedb-i-annuallyfor-two.y9?rfoltowinginstallation.ofaSystem. Thereafter, routine inspections';;[b; p"rrormeo ainually. Additionaiinip6aiont shall be performed as deemed appropriate by the qualified operator' G. H. 't '. F.t ndividual Homeowners Responsibilities 1. Remit to the Association in a timely manner the yearly fee for inspection and routine maintenance' the pumping fee as required, "nO "ny'"nrtj"t iot enforcement actions taken by the Association' 2. provide access to the system for purposes of inspection, routine maintenance, pumping and any enforcement action by the Association' 3. Provide 11x17 as-built drawing of the system showing lot number, street address northerly direction, scale and the location of tne resiience, drivewiy' sewer pipe from the residence' tank' absorption fields and monitoring pipes' 4. lnitiatty install and subsequently Epair or replace defective Systems, as required by the Association' in accordance with the Design Standards and applicable Garfield County Health Codes' 5. Complete necessary repairs or replacement of defective sysGms, as determined by the Association in it,s sole discretion, within 30 days of written notice of'a defective condition or such longer time set forth in the notice. Associafion ResPo nsiD/ifies 1. Administer the implementation of the Design standards and operation of the Management Plan' 2.SetyearlyfeesanddeterminepumpingchargesinamannerthatadequatelyfundstheManagement Plan. 3. Retain the services of qualified personnel to perform inspections, routine maintenance' and advise the Association regarding necess"w prmpil',g and repairs or replacements of individual Systems' 4. Retain the services of a tank pumping comPany to perform necessary pumping' 5. Billindividualhomeoarners as needed and issue notices of defective condition as determined to be appropriate by the Association, in its sole discretion' 6. Retain records of all inspections, maintenance, pumping, repairs, replacement, and enforcement actions. Enforcement 1. The Association shall take the necessary aclion to .collect sums that are over due and unpaid' This may include the imposition of r"i"-"n"rg"s and/or interest overdue sums as determined to be apProPriate bY the Association' z. ln the event a homeovrrner fails to repair or replace a defective condition in the time set forth in the written notice, the Association srr;r have the authority to take any or all of the following actions until the defective condition is repaired or replaced' A. Fine the responsible homeowner a sum not to exceed $1000/day' B.Curtailwaterservicetotheresponsiblehomeownersresidencc. c. contract for the repair or replacement of the defective condition on behalf of the responsible homeovrrner, advance sums on behalf of the responsible homeowner at the rate of 14o/o, and impose an administration fee not to exceed $1000' 3. ln the event the Association fails to enforce these Design standa.rds and Management Plan' Garfield coung shall have fire rignt to take such actioriagainst the Association as it deems necessary. .'-rl Greg Boecker 2929 CountY Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 303-945-6399 n8 February 14, 1992 pursuant to your request, I am hereby documenting the retevant information I am aware of regarding Lot 1, Resubdivision of Los Amigos Ranch (hereinafter 'the property") r, 1. Servicing the property with sewer service will require expansion of the Spring Valley Sanitation District sewer facilities at a cost of approximately $22O,OOo.The tapisy$em development fee to be charged the pads will be approximately $SSOb + 1Oh per EQR or approximately $162,250 (29.5 EQR's x $5500 = $162,250). 2. Supplying water to the property will require expansion of the Red Canyon_ Water Compihi taiitities and insialtation of a 300,000 gallon water tank to meet ISO fire ftow requirehents of 2OOO to 2500 gpm tor apartments. This will cost the developer of the property between $163,000 ana $S+0,000 depending on Los Amigos Ranch's willingness to participate in up front costs. g. Down zoning the property could be opposed by Los Amigos Ranch and Auburn Ridge Apartments. Los Amigos Ranch definitely would oppose it, particularly if the previouily Oesignated building locations were to be changed. 4. lf the property is down zoned prior to October 31, 1998, Los Amigos Ranch will accelerate the outstancjing $1,000,000 Note to the Dowdys and their assignees, and demand full payment of the outstanding balance pursuant t! the terms of the note and the Dowdy/Los Amigos Ranch Contract to Exchange Real Estate dated October 18, 1988. (see Exhibit 'c" to said contract attached hereto). S. lf the property is down zoned prior to sewer expansion, there will be no EQRs available to service the property. Any attempt to put septic tanks on the property, which lies over the Spring Valley neservoii would be opposed by both Los Amigos Ranch and Colorado Mountain College. ln summary it appears the property cannot be down zoned until the outstanding $1,OOO,OO0 note ii paid in fuil, and even then there are attendant problems with sewer servics and Los Amigos Ranch PUD land usage, Construclion of multi-family housing on the property will require expansion of the existing water and sewer facilities. If you have.any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (303-945- 63es). Sincerely, ,':Jt-ti c,.f,i. AB.,A.,-\ Boecker ENGINEERS SURVEYORS (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 SCHITUESER GOBDON MEYER 118 West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 CENTRAL SEWER SYSTEM LARP FILINGS 6.10 oPtNroN oF cosr . CAPITAL COSTS A. LOT COSTS 1. 2. 3. 4. STEP Units STEG Units Tap Fees Service Lines (1 6O'ilot) 1 08 each @ 60 each @ 1 68 each @ 1 68 each @ Subtotal $6,000 $5,000 s7,000 $4,OOO 168 @ $6,500 168 @ $4,500 B. INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS 1. Mobilization 2, Service Taps 3. Service Lines (30'/lot) 4. Pressure Collection Lines 5. Gravity Collection Lines 6. Gravity Manholes/Cleanouts 7. Pressure Cleanouts 8. Air Release Vault 9. Connection to Existing System 1O. Odor Control ISDS - CAPITAL COSTS A. ISDS Systems 1. Standard systems 2. Nitrate reduction CENTRAL SEWER SYSTEM - MONTHLY COSTS $ 649,000 $ 300,000 $ 1 ,176,000$ 672,000 s2,796,000 $ 16,642llot $200,000200.oo $ 33,60025.00 $ 126,00030.00 $750,00035.00 s420,0002,500.oo $125,OOO 3,500.00 $ 1 75,000 4,OOO.OO S 36,000 5,000.00 $ 5,000 $ 20,000 Lump Sum 168 ea @ $ 5040 ea @ $ 25,000 LF @ S 12,OOO LF @ $ SOEa@$ 50Ea@$ 9Ea@$ 1Ea@$ Lump Sum Subtotal $ 1 ,890,600 2Oolo construction contingency, design, legal & const. services $378.O0O Subtotal $2,268,600 TOTAL $ 5,064,600 $30,146/lot TOTAL 1 . Central Treatment Plant 2. STEP/STEG Systems Operation and Maintenance 3. Mil Levy (taxesi ISDS . MONTHLY COSTS 1 . ISDS Operation and Maintenance Prepared by Dean W. Gordon, P.E. May 18, '1998 $ 1 ,092,000$ 756.000 $ 1,848,000 $ 1 1 ,OOo/lot $ 40.oos 13.OOs 15.OO $68.0O/month $ 18.OO/month 1502C19.OOC ilIIET.aEEil$TII:IIII.t!IIIrIE FIESc]UFICE ENGINEEFIING Los Amigos Ranch Partnership c/o Greg Boecker, Ranch Manager 2929 County Road 1 14 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Los Amigos Ranch ISDS lmpacts tNC February 28, 1998 Dear Greg: This letter summarizes an opinion of the potential impacts to the regional groundwater regime by ISDS systems proposed for Los Amigos Ranch Filings 6 - 1O. SUMMARY OF OPINTON It is the opinion of Resource Engineering, lnc. that the risk of groundwater contaminationl as a result of the proposed ISDS systems is remote. There is a probability that the nitrate level in the groundwater under and adjacent to Los Amigos Ranch will slightly increase as a result of the ISDS systems. However, unless existing nitrate levels are already approaching drinking water limits the probability of the incremental flow from Los Amigos Ranch increasing nitrate to a level of concern is slight. This opinion is been based on; 1) review of the proposed development including location and density of the development, 2l review of a Preliminarv Geotechnical Studv. Prooosed Residential Development. Los Amioos Ranch P.U.D.. Countv Road ll4. Garfield Countv. Cotorado, prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, lnc. and dated February 14, 1997, 3) review of Sorino Vallev Water Resources and Water Riahts, prepared by Wright Water Engineers, May 1 977 , 4l review of the Colorado Division of Water Resources water well data base, 5) verbal communication with Mr. Wayne Shelton and Mr. Bodie Collins, water well drillers both familiar with the area, 6) verbal consultation with Mr. Edward O. Church, PE of E.O. Church, lnc., Engineers and Geologists and 7) professional knowledge of the area. The opinion presented here is based on a limited amount of hydrogeologic information. Actual conditions may vary from conditions concluded herein. Specific determination of the hydrogeologic conditions is beyond the scope of this document and would require extensive and costly field investigations. lGroundwater contamination for purposes of this opinion is defined as an increase in the nitrate levelof the groundwater underlying Los Amigos Ranch and surrounding properties to a level above the drinking water standard of 10 mg/liter as established by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Consulting Engineens and Hydnologtsts 9OS Cotonacc Ave-'-.:e E Glenrarood Spnings, Co B160l I t37o)945-6777 | Fax [S7ol 94=-1137 Los Amigos Ranch Partnership c/o Greg Boecker, Ranch Manager Page 2 SITE DESCRIPTION February 28, 1998 Los Amigos Ranch is located approximately 5 miles south of Glenwood Springs as shown on Figure 1, Filings 6 -10 will consist of 164 single family lots on 503.575 acres (3.07 acres i lot) and 4 rural residential lots of 223.556 acres. lncluding open space and roads there is a total of 1,703.058 acres in the development. The density of the development is 1 unit per 10.1 acres. The proposed development is located on a rolling upland approximately 800 to 1,000 feet above the Roaring Fork River to the west. Spring Valley is located to the east of the development. Vegetation on the site is predominantly sage and pinyon-juniper with grass understory. GEOLOGIC SETTING The near surface formation at Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. is geologically recent basalt flows. Beneath the basalt lies the Maroon Sandstone formation or, near the south edge of the property the Eagle Valley Evaporite formation. A general geologic cross section shown in Figure 2. The Maroon Formation dips steeply away from the Roaring Fork River valley. To tlre east of the site lies Spring Valley formed of alluvial / lacustrine (lake) deposits overlying the Maroon Formation. The formations underlying the property are described in detail in the February 14, 1997 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, lnc. report. GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE Groundwater occurrence in the vicinity of Los Amigos Ranch is quite complex. The depth to groundwa'ter and the ability to develop groundwater varies dramatically over a short distance. Three distinct areas, each with differing groundwater conditions exist. These are 1)the upland area where the majority of the Los Amigos P.U.D. will be located, 2) Spring Valley and 3) the Roaring Fork Valley. Each of these areas is discussed below. Los Amigos Ranch Area The geologic settinE of Los Amigos Ranch and the area to the north is basalt flows over the easterly dipping Maroon formation. Numerous dry wells have been attempted to the north of Los Amigos Ranch ranging from 3OO to 800 feet deep. That is, no water table was encountered. These wells generally penetrate through the Basalt and into the Maroon Formation. Depth to groundwater in the Los Amigos Ranch development area may generalty range from 3OO feet to 600 feet or more as shown on Figure 2. These dry wells inclicate that the basalt and Maroon formations are fractured, allowing them to drain readilY. i:i:iFESOUFC= lal!l llrrt l. \l : .t E ! r rt I l '? Los Amigos Ranch Partnership c/o Greg Boecker, Ranch Manager Page 3 February 28, 1998 There is one reported well in the Los Amigos Ranch development area that encountered water. This well is reportedty 1OO feet deep, with a static water level of 60 feet and produced 4 gallons per minute. lt is our opinion that this well encountered a localized perched aquifer condition that exists because of relatively permeable basalt overlying a locatized area of less permeable Maroon Formation. Based on our knowtedge of the area we believe it unlikely that this well could sustain 4 gpm indefinitely. The present management of Los Amigos Ranch has no knowledge of this wells existence and it is not in use. Spring Valley Area Spring Valtey to the east of Los Amigos is relatively flat valley characterized by alluvial/lake deposits as much as 3OO feet thick or more. Presumably the valley is underlain by Maroon Formation dipping easterly. The Spring Valley area is recharged by runoff from the east. Several springs and Landis Creek on the east side of the valley feed the aquifer. There are no known sources feeding Spring Valley from the west. The static water level in Spring Valley ranges from 100 t feet in the south end of the valley to the ground surface in the north end of the valley. lnvestigators in the past (Wright Water Engineers) have opined that Spring Valley effectively fills and spills down Red Canyon Creek at the nofth end of the valley during runoff. Once runoff is over, and the level drains below the natural outlet into Red Canyon Creek, the valley is effectively kept ful! by the major recharge area to the east - northeast. High capacity welts have been constructed in the alluvium in the south end of Spring Valley. These include welts for Colorado Mountain College and Los Amigos Ranclr. These wells are generally between 200 and 3OO feet deep with static water level depths ranging from 76 feet to 200 feet. Further north in Spring Valley low capacity shallow wells have been constructed. Shallow wells in Spring Valley contrast with deep dry holes just west of Spring Valley. Figures 1 and 2 show the proximity of producing wells in Spring Valley and deep, drrT holes immediately to the west. From this we have concluded that the groundwater does not flow from the Los Amigos Ranch development area towards Spring Valley. The hydraulic gradient suggests that groundwater moves to the west from Spring Valley towards the Roaring Fork River. The gradient indicates that groundwater "leaks" from the edges and bottom of Spring Valley and into the adjacent and underlying basalt and Maroon formations. Roaring Fork River Valley Numerous wells have been constructed to support development in the vicinity of County Road 114 and highway 82. To the south of County Road 114 these wells ii!!!RESOUtrCErllaa laala i \l -, \! : i. '= \r j February 28, 1998 Los Amigos Ranch PartnershiP c/o Greg Boecker, Ranch Manager Page 4 generally penetrate alluvial / colluvial material and extend to the contact with the Eagle Valley Evaporite. There is a very thin saturated zone on top to the evaporite from which these wells produce. These *"rr" "pp"ar to be recharged from limited runoff from the Evaporite hillslopes to the ..J, C.iile Creek and irrigation return flows' lt is our opinion that there is limited, if any, hydraulic connection between these wells and the Los Amigos develoPment area' To the north of county Road 1 14 in the vicinity of the Highway 82 intersection there are three types of wells: 1) Roaring Fork River alluvial wells that are generally shallow and immediately adjacent to the river and draw water directly from the river' 2) wells in the Eagle Valley Evaporite r"ngiig-from to.o,.o.2O0 feet deep producing low quantities of pooiqu.6tv water uno'!j *"rr" inthe Maroon Formation adiacentto the Evaporite. Near the contact between the Evaporite and the Maroon it is possible to have one well in the Evaporate and ;;il.; weti in the Maroon only a few hundred feet apart. Generally the wells in the rrr"io"" yield slightly higher quantities of water primarily due to fractures in the tor,,.'"iion. Wur"' quttity in the Maroon is poor due to its proximitY to the EvaPorite' The water level in these Maroon and Evaporite wells is generally slightly above the river level (Figure 2) indicating there is some iecharge from ihe sources other than the river' It is likely that a significant amount of recharge can be attributed to the nearby Gtenwood Ditch anA irrigation to the south although there may be a component from Spring Valley and the Los Amigos Ranch development area' BASELINE WATER OUALITY A limited amount of water quality data from.wells was obtained to determine the baseline groundwater nitrate "on""r,ar"tions in the area' y"t:-t-lality data was obtained from the colorado Department of Health and Environment' water ouality Control Division (WOCD) tor tne wells serving the existing Los Amigos Ranch development and Colorado Mountain College' These wells are fairly close to each other near the south end of the spring vatrev. l-tiuta nitrate sample was obtained on March 3, lgg3 from the Collins Dri1ing -o. well (Permit #46017-F) located north of the intersection of county Road r r + 1no Hignway az. The spring Valley wells are indicative of the water quality above Uoi emigos Ranch and the Collins well is indicativeofthewaterqualitybelowtheLosAmigosRanch. The colorado Mountain college well reported nitrate concentrations ranging from o' 1 8 mg per liter to i.iZ ,g / litei. The nearby well serving Los Amigos Ranch reported nitrate concentrations ranging from o.o0 mg /liter to o'77 mg / liter' These levels are well below the drinking water standards of 1O mg / liter' :;ii:FESOUFCEItaaartlll- 'l - Los Amigos Ranch Partnership c/o Greg Boecker, Ranch Manager Page 5 February 28, 1998 The Collins Drilling Co. well was field tested using a Hach color disk nitrate test kit with a zero to 5O mg / liter range. A sample was obtained from a hose bib afer allowing the water to run for approximately 3O seconds. The test indicated that no nitrates were present. The Collins well is topographically the highest well in the vicinity of the intersection of County Road 1 14 with Hwy 82. lt is possible that groundwater from wells nearer the river would exhibit some nitrates as a result of local up gradient ISDS systems. LOS AMIGOS RANCH ISDS IMPACT It is the opinion of Resource Engineering, lnc. that ISDS systems in Los Amigos Ranch are not likely to cause groundwater contamination as previously defined. This opinion is based on the anticipated wastewater loading rates together with the geologic setting and groundwater conditions described above. ISDS Loading Rate To estimate the potential impact of the ISDS systems a mass balance calculation was conducted to determine the attenuation of nitrate in the groundwater. The analysis was conservatively done, including only the recharge from within the 1,700 acre footprint of the Los Amigos Ranch development area. Based on an ISDS loading rate of 3OO gallons per day per ISDS the average annual loading of 168 units in the 1700 acre development is 0.4 inches per year. This compares to an average annual precipitation rate of 17.7 inches per year in the Glenwood area. lf is assumed that 1.85 inches of annual precipitation is deep percolated2, having a nitrate level of 0.0 mg/liter and that is combined with 0.4 inches of ISDS effluent having a nitrate concentration of 40 mg / liter3 the resulting nitrate concentration entering the groundwater will be 7.1 mg / liter. This is less than the drinking water standards. This analysis does not include the additional attenuation that will occur as a result of recharge that takes place from off the Los Amigos Ranch property. We believe that a significant amount of recharge is occurring as groundwater leaks out of the Spring 2 17.7 inches annual precipitation less 14 inches assumed ET less 50% of the remaining 3.7 inches lost to surface runoff results in 1.85 inches of deep percolation. 3 From personal communication with Edward O. Church PE of E.O. Church, lnc., Consulting Engineers and Geologists, Denver Colorado. !::i:RESOUFCEtttlaItllta \:, N E: F r! : i.r l Los Amigos Ranch Partnership c/o Greg Boecker, Ranch Manager Page 6 February 28, 1998 Valley aquifer. This component of groundwater flow under the Los Amigos Ranch property is likely much greater than the precipitation recharge component. Assuming that 3O0 acre feet of water, having a nitrate concentration of 1 mg / liter teaks from the Spring Valley aquifer each year and flows under the Los Amigos Ranch property, the nitrate concentration estimated above woutd be further reduced to 4.1 mg / liter. Geologic Setting (Depth to Groundwaterl Groundwater in the Los Amigos Ranch development area ranges from a minimum of 1OO feet to as much as 800 feet based on well data. Typically groundwater depth appears to be more than 300 feet over most or all of the Los Amigos Ranch property. Because of this depth the effluent plumes from ISDS systems are expected to disperse and reach the groundwater in a fairly uniform pattern. lt is improbable that concentrated effluent will reach the groundwater that could result in a localized area of anomolously high nitrate levels. CONCLUSIONS The geology, layout of the proposed development and regional groundwater characteristics indicate that it is highly unlikely that the Los Amigos Ranch ISDS systems will contaminate the regional groundwater. The density of the development, approximately 10.1 acres per !SDS system, ensures that the groundwater loading from ISDS systems is low. The great depth to groundwater over the site ensures dispersion of the effluent plumes prior to intercepting the groundwater. Finally, recharge from Spring Valley aquifer to the east helps to reduce nitrate concentrations by adding mixing flows to the ISDS effluent. Sincerely: RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. /A n- /ohn M. Currier, PE Water Resources Engineer JMC/jmc File tit6tosamisos.wpd Attachments Mr. Dean Gordon, w/attachments Mr. Ed Church, w/attachments CC: i::::R=SOURCE!atrt Resource Engineerlng, lnc. : 909 Colorado Avenue GLEiIW9OD SPRINGSi COLORADo 816OOD SPRINGS; COLOMDO 8160I' (970) 945.6777 &{EET}lo. ' /o, CALCUUTED BY orre ?-?-?E CHECXED BY mou.fi an.t.-6;,r.6ffi\ cs orm To ods et\: !c(t rr+ !.t$2:sr=? t ; 6s /,ac )\ nta",. Qi>rtt*l DATE - t.3 a t t I l r a r a, a I a t..a a 7 a I ' '. a a r a Ir2!a!atat xrrtnov A3TVA CNlSdS T< C) l-tJ7ua<t Fa=A lJ-,| =E<: UJa>OlrJJO oz.trio L.JJ i:... =\j,(\ "(\Y..\ N trl u-l(9 l- I Z.o =O L.Ja tll tl Oi trE -/ OHa1 UJq trf,t!!!!I!!!!=alrta @o, O) =O E, iiF o \ \ \ e = H zoo 3 e.trlts =6ur ^ruts*UJ? O- l; IEAIU XUOI CNIU\!0U [,tAR, -i l' 98(IYED) l0:04 lVRICHT UATER CLN1I00D TEL:9709459210 ENGINEEFIING Mr. Michssl Erion, PE Wright Water Engineers PO Box 21 9 Glanwood Springs CO 81602 rNC March 11,1998 RE; Los Amigos RanCh PUD - countY staff Recommsndation #8 to Planning and Zoning Commission. Dear Michael: ln Our meeting this afternoon, and with the Concurr€nce of Mark BeAn, we egreed that it would be appropriate to modify the language in county staff racomm€ndation No' 8' The modified ianguage woutd relnov€ the requiremont for a monitoring plan if e new proposal (i.e. -enhanied' ISDS) is presented for implementation that is acceptable to foright Watar Engineers. The following language is Proposod (new language bolded): 8. That prior to the approval of the Board of county cornmissioners of tfie preliminary plan for- Los Amigos Filings 6-1O, the applicant shall develop a groundwater quality monitorin! plan and mitigation plan, or ln thc altcmativo' develop e tpur-pooposal trat elimlnataa the nced for a monitorlng and nrldgation plan\to be raviewed and foconlmanded for approval by the County's consulting :";i;L*-- cn7"€trl "r/ Coo/*t- ,/,t, y' /an^c ,; //Ou- lf you havo any qugstions pleasa call me. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. I .lJnn u. currier, PE Water Resources Engineer JMc4mc Frla 707'1.0 otozoarrarns'nl cc: Greg Boecker Larry Green, Esq. Consulsing Engineena and Hydnotogists €OBColonadoAvenuc I Glenrarood Spninge, CO El16C]l I (97O)945.672? I trax(97Q P.002 tlISIIIIEI II"l!l FIESc]UFICE WRIGHT WATER I EwetnEERS lNc 4._,|fi,l 1ffi . 04/A8/58 WED 14:40 FAX 1 970 945 5948 SCHMTTESER GORDON MEYER (e7o) 945.1004 FAx (e70) e4s-s948 ErrcrlrE!rs -- wdvcru'' -sGM - 8#fi-,tri,,, :: - @ooz 118 West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 MEMORANDUM vlA MAIL AND FAX:945-921O DATE: TO: April 8. 1998 Michael Erion Peggy Bailey Wdght Water Engineers David M. Kotz, , , 0n /FROM: RE:Los Amigoe Preliminary Plan, Filing 6 through 10, Dotention Analysis Follow-up on Tooics From Our APdl 7. 1998. Mestlng This memo responds to the partially unresolved items we discussed yesterdayl 1. SoUIce of Ralnfalt Data - The 1OO-year, 24-hour storm total was taken from @s for Determining peak Ftows in colorado". A copy of the cover sh€€t and Figure S-7 is attached. You can see that Figure S-7 is identical to that found in NOAA Atlas 2, Volume lll for May through October events, with the exception that the title of tho graph has been changed to "lsoptuvials of 1OO-Yr,, 24-Hr. Precipitation in Tenths of an lnch". As I stated yesterday, these charts are the only ones I have ever seen and utilized for hydrologic oalculetions for this aree. My speculation that the annual isopluvials includeJ the winter time snowfall events was further supponed by information I received from PaulCurrier and John Currier of Resource Engineering. They ran into this situation a few months ago and discussed the matter with Nolan Doesken, an Assistant State Ctimatotogist for the Depanment of Atmospheric Science at CSU. His phone number is 970-491-8545, The conclusions drawn from Resource's discussion with Nolan were that the annual maps did include snowfall events and that rhe May through October chans would be more applicable for rainfall events. I tried reaching Nolan this morning, but was unsuccessful, Nonetheless, I am confident that the rainfall charts used to analyze Los Amigos arc applicable for the SCS TR'55 Methodology' ',pro'cedures for Ditermining Peak Flows in Cotorado" incorporated TR-s5 and was intended as a supplement to the original TH-s5' 2. U3e of th€ CONIC Mcthod for Reservqlr Volumes - Yesterday I erred in stating that a aescfition of ttte method was contained in HEC-2. The description I was thinking of is contained in HEC-1. Pages 36 and 37 describe the procedure and are atta-cned, As stated yesterday, this method is supposed to yield a more accurate calculation of reservoir volumes than the average end area method' I I I 04^/08/gB WED 14:40 FAX 1 970 945 5948 SCHMTIESER GORDON MEYER April 8, 1998 Memo to Erion and Bailey Page 2 3, Conatrucjion of the Ponds - I agree that a detailed Grading Plan for each specif'rc detention pond location will have to be prepared in order to ensure that an adequate elevation versus storage relationship exists for the constructed pond. Yest€rday, I just wanted to emphasize that the elevation/storage relationship utilized in the calculations was practical for the sites being considered. I hope this memo adequately addreSses the items we discussed yesterday. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions or require funher information. DMK 1502C19/lec Afiachments cc: Greg Boecker, Los Amigos Ranch Pannership @ oor GORDON MEYEF.INC. 0_4/08/gg IYED 14:41 FAX 1 970 S45 5S48 SCH}TTIESER GORDON MEYER PROCEDURES FOR DETERT'IINING PEAI( FLOWS IN COLORADO @ oon 5cn/t l INCON.PORATES TECI{NICAL URIAN ITYDROLOGY A}ID SUPPLEMEMS BELEASE NO. 55 FOR SMALL T.IATER'SHEDS li l I $ t !I It t TtrishandbookisarevisionofahandbookbearingEhesame.cirledrEed January Lg77 - Il is inEended for use in deEerlqi"ios peak flows for Ehe design of conservaEion 'ueaEure6 and for eerimaEing effecEs of land uee changes and strucEural fiEesure. ii-*it rages of -<liecharge' tlore detailed procedures ere """ii.ir" in Soil coir.tu'rion Serviee Na;ionaI Engineering Ilandbook, seccion 4 - "Bydrology"- NEH-4 is reconnended for investigaEion of ltaEersheds greacer Utrao 25 equare oilee in size' T T I Soit ConservaEion Service S, GIade wilkes Erke C. King March 1980 T I 04/08/98 WED 14:41 FAX 1 970 945 5948 SCHMTIESER GORDON MEYER @ oos rT:6t; I EI iI lE t I I Il T "r)3,I , l- l\4 (l'-l t I I I -t i\ | .-': I L_:- :V',.n - W I .l >R?ht,'\ i Iri iI EE iI FI i!!i !! iEii a3 T, EIi -: Ei !:' li:at25 it.E!Ti -II ., )3 <r 4- = tTl BtL -l etEI E, CE -lE'(J ET o.L =[ I I I I I t + I I I I I I I I I I I ,--Z,t I I I 1 h-- I -F I I -. I I I I lro I 1-9t '=ir lIi:ri!, s6 t. t I I I ; I i1 .J-l I :$5 04108/98 IEL 14:42 FAX 1 970 945 5948 FRcnrr ilfC - i SCHMTIESER GORDON MEYER t'| t C i) @ ooo ,ti i\ol 3.6,5. Leve}-Pool Reeervolr RoutLng Level-poo1 reServoLr rourlxrg assuBe8 a level YEEeE surface behlnd rhe reservolr. Ir 1s used in conjuncrton wlth the puup optlon deacrlbad tn Secrl0u 3.E and urlth the dan-break calculatlon descrlbed ln sectlon 6' UsLng rhe prlnelple of conoervar,lon of Ea66' the change ln reeervolr atorSge, S' for a grvea ttue perlod, At, l,s equal Eo average lnfIoe. I'qlnuS AveESEe outflow, o' An lteratlve procedute ts uaed to detetmlne end+f?erlod stofage, S2-, and- oUtftow, 02. An tntsLel estiaate of the waEef Surface elevatlon at che ead of the :toE perlod Ls uade. 52 and 02 ate coapuced for thts elevation aad eubstLtuted Ln the followlng equatlon: ,-s-z-st-rrl11 *orlot. r... r... .. . (3.66)--At 2 2 where y te the contLaulty erEoE for rhe estloated qlevaclon. fhe eetlusted elevetlon Ia adJueted untLl Y ls slthln t t cfo (u3/eec) ' (1) Reeervolr StoraL-e. Data. A rcaervolr atorage volume veEBua eIevat1onreIatto@eve1-poo1reeervolrroutln8.Tte relatloaetrlp uay be apeclfted tn trp usys; l) dlrect J'nput of precomputed Storage verBus elevatlon data, ot 2) couputed froa eurfece aEeB verSua elevailon daca. ftre conlc nethod le ueed to c@Puce re8eEvolr volune froq surface ares verSue elevatlon data, tl8. 3,10. I1le volune 19 agguEed ro be Zero aE the loreet elevaClon given, even lf the eurface alea ls greater than zeto at that Polnt. Reservoir outflou aay be compured froa a deecrlptlon of the ou?Iet uorke (loy-level outlet and splllway). ftere aEe llro subroutlaes ln HEC-I uhtch Copuie outflow rarlng cuEVEEr the flrst ueee staple orlflce and welr flov equatlotrE wt1[le the second couputea outflos frou speclflc eaergy ot deel3n grephe lnd correcEe for callwaEer suboergence' (11) OrLflce and lfelr_Flel{. Tlrts optlon l,s often ueed ln ep111uayadequacy@Eafecy,aeeExanpIeProb1ena, Seecl.one 12.7 enl 12.t. FIow through a lov-Ievel ouElet ls couputed fron sz-st - AT uhere Q le lhe cmputed outflou, COQL f s croEo-Bectlonal area of condult, IISEL ls le the elevatloa eE ceEleE of low-Ievel Florr over th. .*!!!g2. ls couputed frou Q-coQL*SAREA r, {T* (wsEt-ELEvL)EXPL. . r .. (3'57) an orlflce coefflclenE, CAREA 1s the rhe wacer surface elevatlon' ELEIL ourlet, and EXPL 15 an exPouento 16 04/A8/Sg wED 14:42 FAX 1 970 945 5948 SCHMTIESER GORDON ilEYER Q . COQIJ r SPWID r (WSEL - qnEllEXE{ . . . . . . . r . . . . (3.68) wheEe Q Ie couputed outflow, C0QI| Le e ueLr coefflclenEr SPIIID ls the effecttve vtdth of splllsay, I{SEL La the uater eurface elevatlon, CBEL is tbe epillway cEe6E elevaEl.on, and EXPtf le an exponeEt. If prruptng or dan breskg.re noE belrU slnuletedr 8lr ouEfloy ratlng curee 1e couputed for 20 elevaclone shLch epaa thc rrote of elevatlone glven for ecorage data. St,oragea ere coaputed for thoee alevaELoas. ftre routLug ls theo aecoopllahed by the nodlfled PuIs Eethod ualag the dertved etorete-outflov relatlou. For level-pool reserrrolr routinS slth puaplug or dsn-break alaulatlon, outflous are conputed for the orlfLce and selr equatl.onc for each ElLe Lntetv8l. rvrr.t(rr+rror'itfr) x, rrl(fff -r) lrhra JY|l r rL--l!.aa lIt -l-t. ll . rtG.EalElr 3l r rfiiorflrlr t r -tEtl alii!. lEt-?ll 11155Agd llrtl i? . tltli at |rr..d Flat G' Flgure 3.10 Conlc Method for Resenroir Volunes I i 17 ttta,r" EITEIrII I.IIIIIIIITIIIIII FIESLf UFICE ENGINEEFIING tNc Mr. Michael Erion, PE Wright Water Engineers PO Box 219 Glenwood Springs CO 81602 RE: Los Amigos Ranch PUD lndividual Wastewater Treatment System lmpacts Dear Michael: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of April 7, 1 998 we have revised to nitrogen loading mass balance for Los Amigos Ranch PUD to use hydraulic loading rates consistent with 87CW155. The nitrogen mass balance calculations were included as Attachment A to our letter of April 6, 1998 addressed to you. The revised calculations are attached. Case No. 87CW155 is the Basalt Water Conservancy District sponsored plan for augmentation that provides the legal water supply for the Los Amigos PUD. The water demands decreed in ihat case are 8O gallons per capita per day with 3.5 persons per residence. The change in the hydraulic loading does not change the conclusion presented in our April 6 letter. lt continues to be the opinion of Resource Engineering, lnc. that there is no risk of groundwater contaminationl as a result of properly designed, installed and maintained individual sewage treatment systems in Los Amigos Ranch. The revised calculations indicate the groundwater nitrate level in the vicinity of County Road 1 14 and Hwy 82 may increase by a factor ranging trom O.22 mg/liter to O.74 mgfliter. This compares to our April 6 letter that calculated the range to be O. 1 6 mg/liter to 0.60 mg/liter. Using the revised numbers, the groundwater nitrate level in the County Road 114'Hwy 82 vicinity may range trom O.22 mg/liter to 4.28 mg/liter. These nitrate levels are much, much lower than federal and state drinking water standards. lf you have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. ./ .t//- 4- / ==/ - /ohn M. Currier, PE Water Resources Engineer JMC{mc File 707 -1.0 tt. 7o7\rcvir&ttechA.wpd attachment: revised Attachment A cc: Larry Green, Esq. Mr. Greg Boecker Mr. Dean Gordon April 8, 1998 rGroundwater contamination for purposes of this opinion is defined as an increase in the nitrate level of the groundwater underlying Los Amigos Ranch and sunounding properties to a level above the drinking water standard of 10 mg/liter as established by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Consulting Engrneens and HydnologlsEs 9OS Cotonado Avenue f Glenwood Spning=. CO A1 6C1 I e7A) 945-677; I Fax [37O] 9/15- 11=-: ATTACHMENT A DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN LOADING FROM ,I68 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 tndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 1. Total Nitrogen Loading to Drain Field . Total Nitrogen into septic tanks: 36 - 94 mg/litt . Total Nitrogen out of septic tanks: 26 - 76 mg/lit2 . Note: These concentrations are based on an hydraulic loading rate of 37.4 galtonldaylcapita and 2.5 persons per household3. Higher per capita water usage would result in lower total nitrogen concentration as the sources of nitrogen loading would remain fairly constant. 2. Nitrogen Reduction in Drain Fields o The soils in the Los Amigos P.U.D. are generally fine grained ctays and silts (CL and ML soils) overlying sandy silty gravels (GM-GP soils)a . A drain field in fine grained soils should remove TOYo of the total nitrogen load in the septic tank effluents. . For this analysis it is conservatively assumed that 50% of the total nitrogen load in the septic tank effluent will be removed in the drain field. lThomas Long, 1995, Methodoloov to Predict Nitrooen Loadinq from Conv. Graviw On-Site M/W Treatment Svstems, Pg. 281. 2lbid, pg. 281 3tbid, pg. 28t aHepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, lnc., February 14, 1997, Preliminarv Geotechnical Studv. Prooosed Residential Develooment. Los Amioos Ranch P.U.D.. Counw Road 114, Garfield Counw. Colorado. sThomas Long, 1995, Methodoloov to Predict Nitrooen Loadino from Conv. Graviw On-Site \AAl/ Treatment Svstems, Pg. 283. April 1,1998 -1- AttachmentA-Calculations Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 lndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 . Total Nitrogen Discharged beneath drain fields 1. Low / =r*j \z- - r /3r^3\ "; X {of" \ -- ---./r't /\ ./,'t 2. High (. 2,'/ )t ') fr3. Mean /1 r*"r = 3 ro3 t;fz Note: Remember these are based on an hydraulic loading rate of 37.4 gpcd. At higher hydraulic loading rates the concentrations would be lower. 3. Nitrate Loading to Groundwater by Mass Balance Approach The calculations will be done two ways: 4.' i' ' ' ' 1. 37.4 gpcd x 2'.67 persons per residenceo :, ^ - )' 2.'^-: IO0 gpcd X 2-67 persons per residence with a proportional 6The Thomas Long report used an EPA derived 2.5 persons per residence. The Eaole Area Communiw Plan, November, 1995, RNL Design, Clarion and Associates and John Humpheries Associates determined that there were 2.67 persons per residence in the Town of Eagle and surrounding planning area. This higher number is used here. April 1,1998 -2- AttachmentA-Calculations Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 lndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 o Precipitation lnfiltration Attenuation 1. Method 1. .-,. Average leach field loading over 1 ,7OO acre P.U.D. ). ,j =-"'.*ttf ro a /^;r )F3 rb)l F''t: 'vnif/.- "- )1t')(@2^'t) 2. Total nitrogen concentration after precipitation dilution assuming precipitation infiltration as outlined in Feb. 28, 1998 letter from Resource Engineering, lnc. to Greg Boecker. 1. Low end drain field effluent of 13 mg /lit. O.9? rvu - ,',,!Lt ' 54r*yo /.?f,. +o..t3!-7t; April 1, 1998 Attachment A - Calculations y','r ( -1. q oor/ enf')*y /3 r-*1 1 \ g"4 ) -: 2. + O, 1=2--l- ES /P Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 lndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 Method 2. 1. Average leach field loading over 1,70O acre P.U.D. /k /= 32f a 29 1a-l ,/ @orcrcs) 2.Total nitrogen strength in drain field effluent. 1. Low end of range ( 3f- ? 1P.J 'o'o' JPcJ =)- ? 10-) /-).d -1 f .)V=" ,*= \/.'-- ):- ) 9, 11 -1- r't 2. High end of range (/? ? ,\bT 3. Total nitrogen concentration after precipitation dilution assuming precipitation infiltration as outlined in Feb. 28, 1998 letter from Resource Engineering, lnc. to Greg Boecker. t'' /.9ftP, oI>(12r^t O.1b L tw lt^4LLv/ :..' ,/ -/2) la-,/'( z4p- )-'/ April 1. 1998 -4-Attachment A - Calculations 1. Low end drain field efflu^ent of 4.86 Tg/lt . (_, 8s, n Frlutf) I a! =:= \ .1 0 . ?{?fr"Y fft:\ z;r ) \- - L--) Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 tndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 t:'3 High end drain field effluent of .14.2 mgflit (,-eirnYry O.3'Jz i:.7 -(,3*L/e,"Y1-r;? ) 2. ) 0 { rr* r O. }F?9 r* - s-1/), : t - Groundwater Mixing Attenuation 1. Assume Spring Valley leakage contribution as outlined in Feb. 28,1998 letter from Resource Engineering, lnc. to Greg Boecker. LToo h.e /<<.R+j< e l*3 /gA\ ?. /- /^) / /. git* r c.L'?z)17 Yo.b'zlr,L {T) 2. Method 1. '.. :- 1 . Low end groundwater loading of b.'Az mg/lit. - ).)- 1- 9{rr.- + o. /j27 ,; .. , : :,1.i High end groundwater loading of 2.54 mgflit. ,C 2. 2:'?? /*? /) -+ ./t' ' ..1 4L/ ar- a =-J' t { d /7 fz- /2 rL" /'9{ 'i " April 1, 1998 ,/ o-( -5-Attachment A - Calculations Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 lndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 3. Method 2.l.cL (: 1. Low end groundwater loading of U.782 mgilit. /zt*\)/.r)r*.? t /.t o.( t'3ia l''a ,('# ) .- ( ?fin-' 2 +'fn 3 t Y.-.,,1' 2Z:3 ; 2.tZ t7 - /- gf tL * o'?t'543, * -4d'- ri-, ^aO. Z / r*+o ./ -t 2. (2 tz r-t- )(, o !'d \ _\\17 a'i3 High end groundwater loading of ?.28 mg/lit tr.i^,^' a.1^'' o {,,* + o. i4tltw Y 2'zryT I\ .L;t )^(L*r /)' 4. 2.tztL + /.?f t,- L o'?{LiZt'' -),'' Nitrogen loading to groundwater withotrt Los Amigos ISDS systems. This includes only leakage from Spring Valley and precipitation infiltration from lncrease in groundwater nitrogen loading as a result of Los Amigos ISDS. /- E z.llt<rt 2rHctE; April 1, 1998 b , S3i ry, , -./. 2t /^7i" l--7 4 nVffi-6-Attachment A - Calculations .(.;+ ?.1?tL L ./, / "- /? r,.-\ t. r te? / /- 9d t2a,,fi.o\'--b\-rt_- -L-+'T r',-K = O-[,r ?--/3{t"- 6. Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 Individual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 Nitrate Concentrations in public water system drinking supplies located in the vicinity of County Road 114 and Hwy 82. o Mid Valley Mart, lnc.1. Low: 1.50 mgflit2. High: 3.56 mgilit . Mountain Meadows1. Low: O.9O mg/tit2. High: 1.83 mg/tit . HLazyFMHP 1. Low: Not Detected2. High: 1.29 mg/tit o Sopris Restaurant 1. Low: 0.00 mg/lit . well permit #046017-F (Collins Drilling, Co. Not a public water system. Analysis with Hach color disk on March 3, 1998)1. Low: not detected o Average of 8 samples listed above: 1 .14 mg/lit lncreased nitrate concentrations in vicinity of County Road 114 and Hwy 82 as a result of Los Amigos ISDS assuming that presently 50% of the groundwater flow comes from the direction of Los Amigos and 50% comes from other sources. Determination of nitrate concentration in "other sources" (-- v .)L )\ I v-l \ -\ \) ^3{. t( (n) \ (. q, -J\- : \,t \ I r) nx\ a\ bt i,\- ,l r\ t* \n \ t-l 7. U)e {3157) r (t(x; -rv J # = l.14 r* 7 /,A.;, -rE. f L_9-,/_u".. _ @Z X-= .LA4 -JL,, lo.{1 ,*3 -'-/k - Calculations-7- -> Attachment A /-"(, n*tr April 1, 1998 I Determination or Nitrosen Loadins I from 168 lndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 I I . Determination of range of increased nitrate level resulting from Los I ^misos tsDS. l. 0l I 1. Low range (GW loading from Los Amigos = 9.89 mgflit) &. Sl \ l.2.tZtu.-/.8fi,*<o|s,,,a,a)(ry).(=./7tu?L3{,,*\t.llt4:1l-n'-'- I C?\Lz.tz?/:rr) r 4-7{'?9, :,?r; , .- -/-- I ttj(-q'(sr"rt) ";'zit" [;;rr^I l= Sl;'''t! I z. High Range (GW toading from l-os effi ,Z I ,2./z */-nr*ti'i;;Uurl n(Lt?+/-ay(jn;|' ,i **.*ou"l__.r,(2rqy')l I - .i?L l. g-E ' I - | : J-7zf ,"*{-]|',,,1,o,0'ri'l.rtr,z{#r I d l,-'2 | ' *. tChange in nitrate concentration as a result of Los AmiQos ISDS l=.u.-3'6t;'.^'vi, 'ru-t/,/ ffi =l@lt ,(a I .Lii12. High Range I _ J.30 tw/l l;t : J-7!,*7 n0'- /. /l f*/ytI- ,/;t ^ ,.ilf) ' ,),('oo 0'v l'F' , a a -8-April 1, 1998 Attachment A - Calculations Determination of Nitrogen Loading from 168 lndividual Sewage Treatment Systems, Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D., Filings 6 - 10 8. Conclusions o ISDS systems in Los Amigos P.U.D. may increase nitrate levels in groundwater in the vicinity of County Road 1 14 and Hwy 82 between 0.16 mg/tit and 0.60 mg/it. . Existing groundwater nitrate levels in the vicinity of County Road 1 14 and Hwy 82 range from 0.0 mg/lit to 3.56 mg/lit. These are welt below the drinking water standards established by the EPA and the State of Colorado. . Properly designed and maintained ISDS systems in Los Amigos P.U.D. will result in no drinkinq water contaminant concerns in the vicinity of Gounty Road 114 and Hwy 82 or elsewhere along the Roaring Fork River. 9. Recommendations . High quality ISDS systems shoutd be required. 1. Trench construction for leach fields is preferable over bed construction. 2. Septic tank effluent filters should be required. 3. Leach field dosing systems from septic tanks should be required (as opposed to continuous feed from septic tanks). . An ISDS management plan should implemented. 1. Operated under the authority of the homeowners association. 2. Annual inspections required. 3. lnspections made individuals trained in the operation of ISDS systems. April 1, 1998 -9- Attachment A - Calculations ii:iiFtEsc:uFtcEIIIII-----E N G IN E E FI IN G IN C Mr. Michael Erion, pE April 9, 1998 Wright Water Engineers PO Box 219 Glenwood Springs CO 81602 RE: Los Amigos Ranch PUD - Septic Tank Effluent Filters via fax Dear Michael: In response to your phone message of yesterday evening attached are catalog cut sheets of septic tank effluent filters. With respect to Los Amigos Ranch PUD we don't want to specify a specific manufacturer, but these will give you an indication of what effluent filters are and how they work. Effluent filters attach to the discharge piping from the septic tank. By filtering the septic tank effluent they ensure that solids of any appreciable size do not leave the septic tank. This in turn reduces the total nitrogen loading to the leach field by eliminating bio-solids loading and, thus, reduces the potential nitrogen loading to groundwater. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGTNEERING, INC. t( * o-(-- ,lnn ,. currier, PE Water Resources Engineer JMCImc File 7Q7'1.0 nr" 7o7\t,ambiotubc.wpd attachments cc: Mr. Greg Boecker Mr. Dean Gordon Larry Green, Esq. Consulting Engineens and Hydnologists SOS C3lonado Avenue I Glenrnrood Spnings, CO Al 601 I l97A) =4=-6777 ! Fax [F7O] 345-i137 Biotubeu Effluent Filter lnsert n-.-,G./fr,G The 0Sl Biotube@ Effluent Fiher lnsert dramatically improves the quality of efflu- ent discharged from a septic tank by preventing large solids from leaving the tank The fiher is easyto install and maintain. The Biotube lnsert fits into virtually any existing 4" dia. plastic oudettee. For tanks which have notyet had a tee installed, a full size 4" fil- te[ such as model FT044+36, is recommended. The fullsize ff0444-36 provides flow mod- ulation and overtwice tre fil- tering area of the Biotube lnserL A Simple Conceptfor Residential Applications Effluent from the relatively clear zone of tre septic tank, between tre scum and tre sludge layers, enters the Biotube Effl uent Filter thro ugh its veftical inlet Effiuentthen enters the annular space between tre housing and fie Biotubes, utilizing the Biotubes' entire screen sur- face for filtering. Particles largerthan l/8' are prevented from leaving the tank. 0nce it has been filtered firough the Biotubes, effluent flows out of the tankthrough fte outlettee. Feafirres and BenefrB o Allours easy retofitfor existing or newtanks that cannot accommodate a full size 4" filter. . lmproves effluent quality. Avera ge Total Suspended Solids (TSS) is less than 30 PPM, nearly 2-U2times lower than a non-screened system! . Superior pdemed design. Extends drainfi eld life. Reliable, conosion-proof construction. o Easy installation. lnstalls in minutes in new or existing tanks. Models for both sched.zl() and 3034 size pipe. . Simple, hassle-free maintenance. Cleaning is quick and easy wifi a water hose. Orcnco gem: lncorporated Stl AlRI,VAY AVENUE STTIHERUN, OBEGON 9,1799012 IE.M{ONE Fal l asg-aaas FACSIMIIE (51r I 15$2884 Rrvirion Ul46 @ lSE 0rcnco Sylore h CoEr.d bv US. Mcrhod ol tlrc Paam l{o:. 4tLIIEl cnd 549EEi .n_,c.ifr,G Specifications OroncoS1lr:temr' lncorporated SIl AIRI,VAY A1JBIUE S1'IHEf,UN, OREGON 917$9012 IB"EPHONE (51r1 459-1449 FACSIMII.E {51r} 1s$288{ 0sr Dimensions Model Frio4r 8-3 Frio4l8-4 Etendible PVG Handle PVC Cap* Pipe Sleeve (3034 only) Air Vents Cartridge Stem Sealing Flange 1r8" Mesh Bistrbe Cartidge Solid Base A Nominal Diameer 4"(fi8 3034) 4"(fits sched. Ol B CarridgeHetght__ !fC lnlet Heiqht D FherArea ft1 L3 Cusbm sbes available. Callfor assistance. FA--] 18' =l ?3 Biotube@ Eff luent Filter lnseft Enisting 4- Dia. PVC or ABS Tee with Pipe E<tension B -c IPVC cap slides into sched. tl{l size tee. PVC pipe sleeve slides into 3{Bd size tee. Rrvi:ion Uttl/!5 @ ISE Orrnco Syrrrrnr lnc CorrGd bv U.s. Mlrnod oi Us! Pstart No. +l3IEl and 5l[8ffi 4" Biotube' Effluent Filter ---,G.-,h,G The 0Sl Biotubeo Effiuent Filter d ramatica lly improves fie quality of effluent dis- charged from a septic tank by preventing large solids from leaving fte tank. The filter is easy to install and maintain. Hosing off the screen is nec- essary only as often as the tank needs pumping. A Simple Conceptfor Residential Applications Effluent from tre relatively clear zone of tre septic tank, between tre scum and tre sludge layers, enters the Biotu be Effluent Filter thro ug h its inlet holes. Effluentthen enters the annular space between the housing and tre Biotubes, utilizing the Biotubes' entire screen sur- face for fi ltering. Particles largerthan l/8' are detained in the annular space, where continued decomposition of organic material occurs. Once it has been filtered through the Biotubes, effluent fl ows throu gh the modulatin g orifices atthe outlet of the fil- ter. lf inflow becomes temporarily excessive, the fluid level in $e tankwill rise as the modu- lating orifices slowthe flow firough the tank, allowing maximum settling of solids. Featrres and Benefrb . lmproves effluent quality. Avera ge Total Suspended Solids (TSS) is less than 30 PPM, nearly 2-U2times lower than a non-screened system! . Superior patented design. Extends drainfi eld life. Reliable, corrosion-proof construction. o Easy installation. lnstalls in minutes in new or existing tanks. . Simple, hassle-free maintenance. Cleaning is necessary only as often as the tank needs pumping. . Allows for smaller diame- ter drainlield pipe. Lowers drainfield material c0sts. . ldeal for variable-grade sewers. Allows reduction of the transport line size and associated costs. . Available alarm. lndicates when mainte- nance is needed. o Custom sizes. Callfor availability. OrencoSyctems' lncorporated SIl AIRWAY AVENUE ST.rTHERUN, OBEGON s,1799012 IE.EHONE (51r1 +lg+lls FACSIMII,E (51r1 4192881 Rcvirion 8/tIUIE O ISE Orenco SystcBB ln( Covcrad bv U.S. Method ol Usc Patem t{os- 44xIEl sno 549635 1-, -.\.;fr,G Specifications OrencoSystems' lncorporated 814 AISMVAY AVENUE SL'THERUN. OBEGON 947$9012 IB..g}IONE (51r1 45S4449 FACSIMILE: (5111 4s$2881 0sr Biotube@ Eff luent Filter Bcvision 8/ltlr'lf @ 19{f Oranco S6anr lnc Covered by U.S- Mahod ol Us. Parem llos. l(IIqt and 5{96ni Extendible PVC Handle cap Air Vents Cartridge Stem Sealing Flange 18" Mesh Biotube Cartidge Solid Base 4' Solvent Weld PVC Tee {Specify pipe 0.0.} PVC Hosing [811 1/g' Diameter lnlet holes Dimensions Model Fr0444 36 ffofie28 A NominalDiameer B Vault Heigttt G lrvertHeigttt D lnvertb lnletHeigtrt l6'il- E lnletHole Height T 19' F HlerArea(ftJ $ 4.1 Cusbm sizes available. Callfor assistance. FA_-1 ai4' 36' tr38' T I D I I I E I Biotube@ Effluent Filter Sizing --.-, ^.-,fr,G Predicting necessaryfiher sizing and accu- rate cleaning frequencies is a difficult process due to many varying factors. 0Sl has developed fie following guidelines hased on experience and system.monitor- ing from a large percentage of over 40,000 screened gravity and pumping septic tank systems. ln fact, 0Sl isfie onlyfilter manu- facturer with sizing criteria based on years of actualfield use. While fiese guidelines may not be accurate for every system, they will be relevant in most situations. The following equation for residential strength wastewater systems was devel- oped based on fie following conditions: 1|A completely watertight septic tank is used. lf either infiltration or exfihration are present, there is no wayto accurately determine fitter sizing, and system opera- tion will be overloaded. 2)A septic tank capacity of at least 1000 gal- lons is used for a single family residence with 3 bedrooms or less, and 1500 gallon capacity for larger homes, up to flows of 600 gpd. 3lSystems handling flows largerthan a sin- gle family home have tank sizing of at least 2.2 times the average daily flow. 4l Residential strengfi wastewater, defi ned as primary sewage effluentfrom a septic tank which does not exceed tre following parameters: BOD = 300 mg/ TSS = 150 mg/l TKN = 150 mg/ Oil& Grease = 25 mgl Sizing Criteria: t) &=Q(0n,0)(MTBC) where: &= Filtersurface area required (ft') e = Fitter coerfi cient (#" ) &,0 = Average dailyflow in gallons (gpd) MTBC = Mean time between filter cleaning in years The filter coefficient, Q, is equal to 0.0044 when actual ortrue daily average flow rates are used for Gro . A value of 0.002 is applicable if 'Projected Daily Sewage FloW'is used. The'Projected Daily Sewage Flow" is defined as a peak flow ftat allows for a safety margin and is typi- cally much largerthan fie actualflow. All values are based on a filter surface area with approximately 30% or more open or TlovV'area. z)& = 0.0044 (&x) (MTBC) (for calculations based on 'actualflows") 3)A = 0.002 (&x) (MTBC) (for calculations based on'Projected Daily Sewage FloW'as defined above) OrcncoSystems' lncorporated 8I1 AI8lA/AY AVINUE SI'IHERUN, ()REGON 9,{799}12 IETPI{ONE (sarlasg<sg FACSTMI,E. (54r1 459288{ BIA.FT.FT.I REV. tJL O 3/lr$ PAGE I ol 3 Example: A single family home produces an actual flow of 225 gallons per day. lf a minimum 5 year cleaning frequency is desired, how much surface area is necessary? Which BiotubeTM Effluent Filter should be selected? Answer Since actualflows are used, equation #2 is valid. Therefore, As = 0.0044 (22S1 151 = 4.95 ft 2 Referring to the Biotube Effluent Filter Screen Area Chart below, tre model Ft0444-36 has a screen area of 5.3 ft 2 and is therefore selected. lf a kitchen garbage disposal is used, more frequentfilter maintenance may be required, due to the additionalsolids load- ing. Kitchen garbage disposals contribute an additonal 36% (approximaitely)to the level of solids loading. lncreasing the sizing coefficientto 0.0067 (based on actualflows) gives better approximations for sizing and cleaning frequencies when garbage dis- posals are used. Using a minimum 1500 gallon septic tank is also recommended for homes with garbage disposals. Sizing filters for systems largerthan single family dwellings is more complicated. Generally, in orderto maintain a minimum two yeartank pump out schedule, a septic tank size of 22 times the expected average dailyflow is necessary. For systems larger tran single family dwellings utilizing proper tankage and not exceeding residential stengfi wastewatef fitter sizing using tre given equations is valid. Systems having less ften 2.2 times fte expected daily flow in storage require more conservative filter sizing to prevent the need for frequent cleaning. Wastewater from restau rants, ind ustrial plants, and other higher waste strength sources need more detailed analysis of the wastewater characteristics for proper tank and filter sizing and configurations. Please call to discuss these applications. Much higher loading rates may be used for handling recirculating sand filter effluent, wetlands effluent, and other lower strength effluents. Please callto discuss these applications. Model Nomenclature FTOs Biotube@ Effluent Filter Screen Area Ghart Unit Screen Area * Series (ft,/lineal ft) Effective ScreenModel Area (ft,) Fr0400 ffo600 ffo800 1.77 ?tr 5.6 Ft1200 11.2 Fn500 18 al al ff0444-36 5.3 ff0654-36 10.6 ff085+36 '16.8 Ftl254-36 33.6 ff155+36 54 ff1572-54 81 ffr596-72 108 r Unit Screen Area (in ft 2 per lineal foot) multiplied byfre tube lengfi gives the effective screen area in ft 2. EOA.Fr. T.I REY. rJt. @ 9/&$ PAGE2 ol 3 Genera I ized App I i cati ons Ghart (residentiat waste strensth): Source Recommended Filters 2 or 3 bdrm single family homes 4 bdrm or larger homes 1000 gallons per day 2000 gallons per day 3000 gallons per day t$00 gallons per day 5000 gallons per day 10,000 gallons per day or more Use of multiple fihers or deeper versions of standard filters to achieve desired screen area is an option at any flow. Many situations require special designs; modifications of standard filter dimen- sions are accommodated easily. Fr0444-36 FT0444-36, ff0654-36, F10854-36 ff0854-36, ffI254-36 FTt254-36, Ft]554-36 FT1254-36, ffl554-36 ffl554-36 ffl554-36 multiple filters EtftfI-l REY. t.0, @ 9/rJ!5 PAGE 3 ol 3 SRO4O2 Slide Rail System *.-,G.-,frt € Orrncoffiu lncorpontedFor Effluent Filter Applications Liquid Level 1'DIA. PVC SLIDE RAIL r 3/r tNtEr Ho["Es .. OIA PVC SLIDETEE 1'DIA STOP COUPUNG (ACTS AS STOP FOR FILTEB} 4'DIA PVC (Eeld cut to length) PVC FI.ANGE (Bottto tank bottom or cast in comainer filled with concrete) 8II AIR\A/AY AVENUE SI'IHEf,UN, ORSGOTI |r,i179$t2 IIIETIONE l51t I 15!r{419 FACSTM[.t (51r I 15S2881 ED+r-SR-t REV. t, O 7/17/5 PAGE I BIOTUBE EFFLUENT FILTER SRO402 Slide Rail S stem For Effluent Filter Applications 1'DIA PVC AIR RELIEF 4'DIA. COUPLING 1'DIA PLUG rDlA PVC OUTtEr 4' DIA PVC SLIDE TEE f OIA PVC SLIDE RAIL r 3/r INLEI HoUS 1' OIA PVC SLIDE TEE f DIA COUPLING (ACTS AS STOP FOR FILTES} r53' PVC FI.ANGE (8oh to tank or cast in cortainet filled with concretel ^---,G.-,fr,G o;mcotfa lncorpcod 8I{ AISWAY AVTNUE SIJI}IERUIiI. OSEGON s,171lqlt2 IB.MONE l5{rltcr{.g fAcslMrtE l5{1115$2A1 EI}FT.SB2 REY. rroTnls PAGE t T I FIELO CUT TO TENGTH I I = _l_ ! ' Note: Slide rails used with 1f, diameter fitters require minimum 2l' diameter tank access opening. Front View Ssction A-A Top View SRO402 Slide Rail System '--..-iC.-,fr, € o;ru$mr IncorpqodFor Effluent Filter Applications I'DIA. PVC AIR RELIEF I 3/8'UFTING HOLES (2} 4'DIA. COUPLING 2'DIA. PVC OUTIET 4' DIA. PVC SLIOE TEE 4'DIA. PVC SLIDE RAIL BIOTU BE EFFLUENT FILTER 1 U8'INLET HO["ES 4'DIA. PVC SLIDE TEE 4'DIA. COUPUNG (ACTS AS STOP FOR FILTEF) PVC FLANGE (Bolt to tank bottom or cast in container filled witt concretel 8I1 AI8WAY AVENUE SI'IHEUN, ()REGOI{ 9179$r2 IA.EONI l51ll15g-s9 tAcslMrtE (sflt1$12881 EIDFT.SR*I REY. r! @ rn7,$ PAIiE T memo of: Date: Re: REI File No. f;$E$H RESOURCE Hf;fiSH ENGINEERTNG, tNc. Phons:(97O) 945-A777 Fax:(97O) 945-1137 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Dept. April9, 1998 Los Amigos Ranch PUD Filings 6-10 707-1.0 Michael Erion Michael asked that I transmit any correspondence to him regarding Los Amigos to you as well. Therefore attached please find: 1) Letter of April 8, 1998 to Michael Erion providing followup information Michael requested 2) Letter of April 9, 1998 to Michael Erion transmitting information on septic tank effluent filters. I believe you have all other written correspondence between Resource Engineering, lnc. and Wright Water Engineers related to this Los Amigos proceeding. eAmiiil-O CXLft,tlY From the desk of... John M. Currier, P.E. Water Resources Engineer Resource Engineering, lnc. W :iiiiFIESOUFICEtltl!I'IITENGINEERING INC R, -09' 9S(?Hlri'i5: l7 lIRIGHT I\IATER GLNIYO0D TO: FROM: DATE: RE: TEL:9709459210 MEDIORAI\DTIIVI Mark Bean, Garfield Corurty Planning Office ;*[1;,3i',Ti"n; Jif;,, ., @ Z* Los Amigos Preliminary Plan Review P,001 V/e are in receipt of additional drainage analysis aud ISDS analysis for the proposed [,os Amigos project. We reviewed the following documents. r [.os Amigos Rauch Preliminary Plan, Filings 6 through 10, Stormwater Dercntion 4114p!g, Aprit 1998, prepared by SGM. o Memorandnm to W\trrE dated April 8, l99t from Dave Kotz, P"E. with SGM- o Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. Individual Wastewater Treatment Systems Groundwater Impact dated Ap.il 6, 1998, p:epared by Resource Engineering. r Apnl 8, 1998 letter to WWE from Resource Eqgineering. o April 9, 1998 letter to WWE from Resource Engiueering- The following are our comments. Drainage Analysis In general, we found the updaed drainage analysis including deuiled calculations for detention pond sizing and operation to be acceptable for preliminary plan submittal- The applicant is proposing the use of four detention ponls located in thc upper reaches of the four sub-areas within the sirc. Volumes havE beca calculared for maintaining historic rufloff, under developed conditions, for storms up to and including rhe 100-year flood event. Calculations indicate that all posrdevelopment flows will be at or less rhan sxislfuig conditions. The detention ponds that were submitted were a geueric computer generated pond configuration developed to fit in all four basins. Alttrough the calculations indicate that tNs pond will work in each basin, the final plans shdl include a detailed grading plan with shge-storage volume reladonships developed based on the acnral topography. We reviewed this with Dave KoE with SGM and he is in agreemeat with our comrnent. d =a G, UI llJz (,z uJ G, UJF BFtg E, = APR. - O9' 9 8'(f HU ).1IT , I 7 lVR I GHT IIATER GLN1YOOD TEL:9709459210 MEMO TO: Mark Bean Aprit 9, 1998 Page 2 We believe rhe data submitted fulfills Condition No. 9 of the Planning Commission Recommendation. ISDS Impact Analysis The Resource Engineering report concludes that their analysis, together with the commitment to construct and maintain guality ISDS systcms with design standards and management plan, indicarcs that there will be no adverse impact to groundwater quality. Based on our review, we generatly concur with the Rcsource Engirrcering conclusions. Thc analysis includes a rumbcr of engineering assumptions and judgment. We reviewed the analysis making more consertative assumptions in all cases and found that ttre Resource Engineering analysis would result in a cumulative toal niirate concentration of less than 7 mgll. This is less rltan the Sare and EPA sandard of 10 mg/l- Given rhe applicabiliry of warer quatiry srandards and pollutants typically associated with septic ank/leachfield effluent, the primary pollutant of regulatory concern expected to be associated with sepric hnk/leachfield effluent is nitrarc. Nitrate is typically selecrcd as the limiting pollutant from the regulatory perspecdve for several reasoDs including: (1) pollutauts associared with septic tanlc/leactrfield contaminatioa are commonly known to be nitrarc and viral/bacterial conraminanrs; (2) nitrate is krown to be highly mobile in zubsurface environnents, while viral/bacterial contaminants are morc easily absorbcd onto soils; (3) thc regulatory limit for nitrate is low relative to tlpical nirate loadings in septic system effluent; and (a) ninate concentrations are guite low in undeveloped and uncontaminated stream sysEms. We believe this reccnt deailed annlysis fulfills the submittal requirements of BOCC Resolution No. 9G34, Paragraph 5. W.WE previously recommended a monitoring and mitigation plan in the absence of a deailed quantiarive analysis. With this additional analysis, tlre stringenr design sandards, aud the mairrterrance plur, we believe the applicant has developed an accephble alternative approach as outlined in Condition No. 8 of $e Planning Commission Recommendation. WWE will have additional deailed commeils on the desigl standards aud maintenance plau. PMB/MJE/dIf 92L-M7.W P, 002 Wright Water Engineers, lnc. BlSColoradoAve. P O. Box 219 Glenwood Sprjngs, Colorado 81602 (970) 945-7755 rEL 1970) 945-9210 FAX (303) 893 l608 DENVER DIRECI LINE April 13, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Regulatory Office & Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3303 RE: Los Amigos Preliminary Plan - ISDS Impact Dear Mark: This letter presents additional comments on the April 6, 1998 report by Resource Engineering regarding proposed ISDS systems for Los Amigos. Analvsis We believe the Resource report overstates the conclusion with assuming phrases such as "no risk," "low levels," "increase slightly," and "well below standards." There is an impact on the increase of nitrate levels and it could be between two and seven times the existing levels. However, the total cumulative, and diluted, concentration of constituents in the regional groundwater aquifer is estimated to be less than State and EPA drinking water standards. Design Standards and Management Plan We recommend the Design Standards and Management Plan presented in Attachment B of the Resource Engineering April 6, 1998 report be included in any approvals for this project. In addition, we recommend the Plan be modified to include the following: All ISDS systems shall be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and shall meet applicable County Regulations and the "state of the practice" at the time of construction. In addition, the design shall also include the following criteria [as given in the Plan and with WWE's recommendations below]. All tanks shall have properly sized effluent filters. The 213 time use, 1/3 rested bed concept is good and will increase the effectiveness of the system. However, we are concerned about proper operation and exactly how this will be implemented. This requires more detail on operation and, in our opinion, requires that the absorption field be oversized by tl3 to meet hydraulic loading requirements. DENVER {303) 480-l 700 DURANGO (970) 259 7411 BOULDER - i303) 473-9s00 /*,D Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office April 13, 1998 Page 2 Design criteria should include considerations for minimizing impacts and protecting groundwater for other constituents of concern. "Qualified personnel" to perform inspections should be defined in more detail. This person should have professional working knowledge of ISDS systems and be certified by the State for ISDS systems when such certification becomes available. A brief annual summary report of inspections, repairs, and replacement should be compiled and submitted to the County. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Very truly yours, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. MJE/d1f 92t-047.040 Michael J. Erion, Project Manager Apr-2L-9A OI :2IP Stella t Archu I eta 97cJ-945-77A5 P-05 GOULDS Model 3887 lnstallatiil, 0pntion and taintenancG lnstructions I ImFORTA}IT 1. lnspect unit for damage. 2. Electrical supply must be a separate branch circuit equip- ped with proper fuses or circuit breakers, wire size, etc., conform- ing to National Electrical Code plus local codes. Power supply voltage, phase and controls must match pump nameplate requirements. 3. Always disconnect electrical power supply when handling pump or switches. 4. Do not use pump in swimming pools or hazardous liquids. 5. Liquid temperature not to exceed't60"F. (71oC) 6. Do not remove ground prong or use extension cords. 7. Use basins as offered in Goutds Catalog. tr Rrmp & Piping 1. Thread discharge pipe into discharge connection. lf a check valve is used try to avoid installing it vertically. Position horizontally or at a 45o angle with valve pivot on top. This guards against solids lodging on valve preventing it from opening. Drill a %s" hole in dis- charge pipe 2" above pump discharge connection to prevent air locking the pump. A gate valve should be installed in the systern, after the check valve, to permit removal of pump or check valve for servicing. A union should be installed be tween check valve and pump. 2. Threephae pumps must be checked for proper rotation atter wiring is cornplete. Rotation must be counterdockwise look- ing into pump suction. Caullon: Do not attempt to feel for rolation with fingers. Rotat- ing impeller will cause severe injury. 3. Singl+phase pumps have built- in thermal overload protection with automatic reset. Thrae- phase units must be protected by a starter with proper overload protectioh. See Table. Itr Basin Basin should have a sturdy bot- tom to give legs of pump adequate support. Leg height elevates pump above bottom of basin to allow wastes to reach suction opening. When using basins without hubs, attach 4" cast iron inlet hub to drain line as required. ln case ol duplex basins, seal second hub if not used. E Bacin Gover Remove protective strip trom gas- ket and press onto recessed pbrtion of basin rim. With a pointed lool, threaded into flange provided with basin cover. I Hanual Operation This is accomplished by manualty switching power on or oif to the pump. On pumps equipped with a molded plug, insert into a suitable outlet controlled by a switch. Where a separate contfpller is used the"Hand-off-Auto"lswitch is turned to "Hand" operation. U Automatic Operation 1. Dlaphragm Control Switch. (ALS2-1), (ALS2.2) and (ALS2-a) A pressure activated switch provid- ing automatic operation with 6" ditferential in liquid level. Turns on when liquid is 10" above bottom of switch and turns oll al 4" above botlom of switch. Canllon: This controlswitch has a vent which must be left unob- structed and protected from moisture, dirt, or foreign material. Mount electrical cord so vent tube poants downward. t/t HP, Vz HP, 1'l5V or 230V, 1 @ pumps may be controlled directly by the switch. %-1 HP, 7'/z HP. 1 O units require a contaclor. 3 @ units require a starter. 2 Merorry Switchs Mercury switches are single float switches that as the liquid level rises or falls, the float changes angle until the mercury switch makes or breaks the circuit. Fit basin cover over discharge pipe. Power cords are seated wim-spitii rubber stopper. Rubber ring iiplace.i over discharge pipeind compressed between pipe anct cover by the llange (chamfered side down) to form a seal. Vent pipe is Furnta Overload. Sizc.Slrilr Slrc 00, !4BF32BCBi Lod.l No.HP vofir Harlart E x wso532a ws0534B 230 E39 K31 460 E28 K2l ws0732B wso7318 llr 2s0 E4t K32 460 E3l K23 wsl032a ws10348 I zfi E4?K3 460 E33 K24 ws1032BH WSIO34BH I 230 E5l K43 460 E41 K32 poke holes through gasket into tap ped holes. Do not damage threads. Route electrical cords through rba tialdrrbd.l A+.lrDa. Oltl.rGta HP Bngn ELcl?'lcdirhe ilr59 Co.rtgF wrdoar AL52-3 NO Yr5 Srng,,e or Th.oc Phrsa Errc L.adt ALS2.5 AL52{ Ye! r r5v si^9t. Phasa 23OV Singl. Phrs Ihr.. ftonEcd Bu9 ALSz-7 'lv5 Singla or fh..a Pha SaraLrdi AL52-9 t15V S.rlglaPhu Th,!Pqlo d Plug - ovaT - Apr-2L-98- OLz22P Stella Archuleta lrtrr-t 97cJ-945-7745 P-06 TECHNOLOGY lvsrnttanoN NsTHuCflaNs - page 2 Control switches with pipe clamps Figure 1 - Three Float lnstallation , i MANUAL TESTING fro simutate ahemator,; t opentionsquence).,i t oPerationsequence). /l t i'-- | For case ot insl;:,llat:g\ {tiL:r1 , ) l. Make sure allflut switches arc in off psition- SEE- .1 l FI6,UFIF I rnsitbn ol lao.lalarm llaat \ 1e\ oI \illll lY"-' lV lil HaUREt,positionottag/atarmttut. lrl I Il [-J lt n i,{ 2. Tumonpwetsoutca.Thecontrclpanelantol lll I JU ll * *r switchstroudbeonandbthHOAswitch*shwtd I i I I llx,/ *-t[ [ 3 ( vr be in automatic position. lll I I n It ] O:3. Tipcommonstopfl@ttoonpsitbn.SEEFl6uRE lillll- lA \ i g,LLtJsrRATtoNA. i i l I f,r,c*,. I H * i t l. whilecommonstopfletramainstippd,Wt@d I ll I I lh/'ro'Fa"l m I { s floattoonpxition. Atthispoint,onipumpaNonellllj_|!J lffi IS! pumpruntishtwittturnon. I ,l i I I ffi/ G. * L5. Retumteadfloattooff position.Rerum@mmon ,d rH/ j \ ifl i Is ":":,ffi:;1{;";l:;xi"*!tr,umpaupump{LE;l ll. " 519 , }#Y i i' ? L 6. Repeat"rrpr fuo. 3 and 4. The second pump utd {. i - pump run ndicator light will tum on. Repeat sevara! i $'#:; ;:#fLv;::';7y:::';^* For a tou'l Fisure 2- Four Ftoaunstattation A ,X ,. !:;:"rtr#,;::T#1,::,Hi!l*;yffi". For case of insallation and salery rrrlsons, w. n*ommoad npnual tcatlng ol llut switch opention prior to attachlng tloats to dl*hergoplp ln the pump chamber. aarm system will be operating.8. Both pumps, pump run lights, aN abrm system will remain running until alltlats ara retumad to olf position. The complete qptem will be oll at thb pint. Four float installatlon only thile altemate pump is running (ammon s:top and lead floats remain tipped), tip lagfloatto on psi(nn. Both pumps will now be opeating and will renain on. Now tip alann lloat to on position. Both pump aN alarm systems willbe operating. 10. Tip abrm flut to otf position. Atarm system witt sh& olf. ll.Both pumps will remain running until all remahing lloats are tipped to otf position. Complete system wiil be oft. ,ALTERNITE FIUR FLaAT ARRANGEMENT To indicate alarm condition before lag pump tum on, mount the alarm lloat between the tad and lag f,cE,fs- Float wiring remains the sme as shown on wiing dlagam. CLAIIP DETAIL (ScFgur.3) $ffVf', ;--tvA?el , --Fd l"t-fi.ye Flo5,tl,,En,lE,don slr/vn is lu z hfiTht6,wl afun sysottt-To insdtaba lcvC &m q/'Hrr, t"it'l9e tn ins,,l/,ldr,n q*oldr- lbr,E.tlpvt, h tp i,{/!,tat,on aDE,r''. @amcn .W ltof/l sttot/& bo ntolt:.dA uwd lewl, lollN by tp M ttr,l cE WtD (glyr.&tu bUtttiwl stip an fia st tc lbr a h4h u lw lewl sy&,ttt tourcntl i tg cor,o,gro? 40At NoTE: UN|T SHOULD BE PERIODICALLY TESTED ,,VSUFE P RO P EN OP ERATIO N. rlmnbtrc" OL:22P Stel la Archuleta PUMP UNIT NO.I 97CJ-945-7745 UMP EASIN P -07 DISCHARGE pIpIti ('f,') \ PIPE WITH .FEOAT SWITCHES TEE PUMP UNIT NO.2 MANHOLE CENTEREO ON PUMPS, INCLII-IE VILLACE G El.IERA L I I/ F,I? C)\/EI\4Ei'JT DIS'I'RICT NOTE: Pressure Itnesshall be stzed co provtdea minimum velocicy of 2feec. per secpnd. ,'.I\PIOVEO CY I I | ,.,,.t^,ct rxr,rr.r: cA R C E 5970 '*- G. pELL INDIVIDUAL PUMP I^ N ?N /IM. MANNi?--..-...-r IGID METAL PIPE/ITH FLOAT SWIICHES PUMP POWER N.U{-psRm OIS CHARGE EITH ER UMPS OFF 1r.,(9 E (J(r, UMP PUMP rN-DrvrDuAL PUMP---i; ; ;;;- - Is_TAI.lpN DETAIL l'' L I-,,---,1 , '. .-r-..,....,.- -----...-...., -J-_.. ATE VAIYE Apr- 2L -9A OL :23P Ste I I a' Archu -l eta 97cJ-945-7745 P-Oa I g#:';iflutf SPG}I gIBI{ERSIBLE CBII{DER POHP llilG]l ilEf,Dl qSFsru-Tjr3"'l.ilifliJffi ""'.B,HIHP H Y D Ro M A T I c'" s P G H atAor- 2I. l, -,i -94 01:2OP Stella Archuleta 970- 94s- 7745 P -02 Exy April 17, 1998 Re: Los Amigos Ranch Fiting Gl0 (LAR) Waste Treatment Options Facts: l) LAR is situated on soils ofpredominantly hard, higtrly fractured rock formations (basalt) and highly fractured sandstone (maroon). 2) LAR will have approximately 165 srngle family lots of 3.07 acreMot over an area of 503 acres. There will also be 4 rural lots of 223.5 acres (cumulative?). 3) Hepu'orth-Pawlak Geoteck Soil testing of 21 exploration pits spaced throughout the property resulted in the following: a) No holes were dug in exoess of l0 feet b.) 13 holes had refusal (hit rock or large boulder) at less than seven feet - of these, 8 had refusal at less than 5 feet. c.) Topsoil layers are tlpically 3 feet or less. 4) CTL Thompson identified 2 geologic faults and a slide area on the property. Others Opinions: a.) Lincoln Devorc 1982: "shallow beclrock is highly fractured and permeable, which will a.ffect the potential for individual se,otic systems and mav necessitate the use of a g entnal septic svstem.' b.) Hepworth Pawlak 1997: "Dense hard basalt is expected at relatively shallow depths 'and difficult excavation conditions should be expected". "...exploratory pits excavated in the general proposed development area consist of l-3 feet of topsoil overlying nil-7 feet of clay and silt". "...it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater rnay develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. fur urder drain system should be provided to protcct below grade constnrction...from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup". *Conventionel inliltretion septic dispolrel systems. topeer fe.asible for the development. Moundine or other ensineered systems may be required in shallow basalt rock arcss'. c.) Resource Engineering 1998: "...thgIe is no risk of grcundwater contamination as a rtsult of properb designed. installed ald meintained individual sewase treatment svstems in Los Amieos Ranch'. "The opinion presented here is based on available hydrogeologic information. ...Further investigation of the hydrogeologic conditions is beyond the scope of this document and in our opinion is not warranted for this investigation". "Individual Wasteweter System Criteria -l)Use of septic tark effiuent filters. 2) Use of leach field dosing systems. 3) funual individual wastewater system inspections..." d.) Mclaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.: "Documented cases of widespread ground-water contamination from septic systems have been in areas where lot sizes range from less ttran one quarter of an acre to three acres". "shallow ground-water flow above the Roaring Fork river valley is largely controlled by significant fracture permeability as opposed tt inter-granular permeability..."'Open voids and caverns can be seen in nrany outcrops..." "As a result, high-nitrate water Aom the septic leach fields may concentrate near the water Apr-2L-9A OI :2OP Ste-l -la. Archu-leta 970- 945- 77A5 table". "Use of individuel n nesidentitljevelopFrent is not recommended as proposed and should not be aoprcved by Gerfield Countv oflicials". e.) Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 1998: "There is an impact o levels and it could be between two to seven times the eristing levels. However, the total cumulative, and diluted concentration of constituents in the regional groundwater aquifer is estimated to be less than State and EPA ddnking water standards." "...we recomrnend the Plan be modified to include the following: 1) All ISDS systems shall be designed by a Colorado P.E. ...meet..."state-of-the-practice". 2) AII tanks shall have properly sized efllrent filters. 3) The 213 vsr,,l/3 rested bed concept is good...however, we are concern€d about proper implementation.. 4) Desrgr criteria should include consideration for minimizing impacts and protecting groundwater... 5) Qualified personnel to perforrr inspections should be defined in more detail 5) A brief annual summary report of inspections, repairg and replacement should be compiled and submitted to the couDty. County Engineer's Opinion: In rural areas with deep granular soil t1pes, individual nonevaporative septic systems are the most efficient form of waste treatment. The existing parameters in this situation are a non-rural environment (3acreVlot) with fiactured rock and sandstone structure, verylittle topsoil and adjacent to a flowing waterway. There is also an active waste treatment facility in close proximity to this location (although this plant would most likely need upgrading with any added flows). The percolation tests assurne general homogeneous soil tlpes and I don't feel that in areas of fractures and rock formations that these should be decisive in the decision making process. The 1995 Long Report (attached-Resoruce Engineering) states nitrogen removal is primarily accompiistred at the soil gravel interface. With minimum soil and areas of questionable gravel ttre existrng location would be rm,able to remove significant nitrogen natually. In the absence of "rDan-made" solutions, groundwater pollution is unavoidable if conventional individual septic systerns are used. There is existing technology which would ficilitate individual waste treatrnent: 1) mounding:. adds more topsoil to provide additional biological interactive surface area downside - need to bring in soil 2) evapotranspiration: gives each resident their own sewage lagoon downside - odor, r:nsightly, needs maintenance for biological processes 3) biological filters: remove nitrogen at the waste source dowrside - maintenarrce to assure proper biological processes, prevent clogging 4) larger tanks: hold efluent for longer detention times (optimum puri$ing efficiency is obtained after about 6 weeks). downside - room and depth for tank, excavation 5) Plug Flows: release efluent to leach field at preset periods to assure even distribution in soils. downside - control system to do this properly, maintenance P-03 Apr-2L-9A O1:21P Ste-l la Archu-leta 970-945-7745 The concept of additional nitrogen removing filters, yearly inspection and maintenance, site specific engineering, and annual reports and documents to the county places a considerable bnrden (each and every year) on both the horneowner and the coulty. In additioru each specific building site could feasibly have a completely different septic system of varying degrees of corDponents and technology - which could, at a later date, conforurd efforts to standardize environmental discharge s. Recommendation: Although it would be possible to have individual waste treaunent systems on each lot, this option "assumes" that the lot owner would be technically knowledgeable and skilled at maintaining the biological process of their system year round, year after year. It also assunrcs that a property owner would not mind living next to their neighbor's sewage lagoon or accept a large mourd of soil not native to the area Larger tanks would create larger despoiled unvegetated excavations. In addition, the county would be faced with 164 new yearly reports on each system's output, in addition to monitoring and certi$ing technicians capable of installing and repairing an unknown variety of systems. I would recommend installation of a low pressure sewer ejection system whereby each property owner would purcbase a septic purnping unit ($2,000-$4,000) which would hold and pump efluent up or down hill to a central flexible sewage line. This central sewage line (installed by the developer) is made of flexible low cost plasic beX and spigot piping or polryinyl continuous piping and would follow the grourd contour with a rninimum of excavation. As this system is pressurized, the oeed for Iift stations is eliminated and all residents would tie in to the existing gravity system or could empty at another system treatment facility. This system has successfully been used to assure pristine savfusnrnental compliance throughout the Lake Tahoe area- P -04 Garfield County Engineer BEATTIE & CHADWICK ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 7IO COOPER AVENUE, SUITE 2OO GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO Al60I STEVEN M. BEATTIE GLENN D. CHADWCK KAREN J. SLOAT April 27 , l-998 Mark BeanGarfield County Planning DepartmentGarfield county Courthouse 109 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs, CO 8l-601 Re: Los Amigos Ranch Filing 6-10 Dear Mark: On behalf of Colorado Mountain Co1tege, I would like to submit the attached letter as a written comment for the consideraLion of the County Commissioners in connection with the continuation Los Amigos Ranch hearing, which I understand is scheduled for 1:OO p.m. today, April 27,1998. CMC does not plan to offer any live testimony at the hearing. Please let me know if you have any questions. Yours very truly, Enclosures pc: Robert H. Spuhler Jerome F. Gamba Lawrence R. Green Lee LeavenworthKevin Patrick Sherry Caloia John M. Kaufman d?J TELEPHONE (970) 945-8659 FAX (970) 94s-8671 Chadwick STEVEN M. BEATTIE GLENN D. CHADWCK KAREN J. SLOAT BEATTIE & CHADWICK ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 71O COOPER AVENUE, SUITE 2OO GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO AI60I 8l_601- TE LEP H ON E (97O) 94546 59 FAX (970) 945-8671 April 27, 1998 Board of County Commissioners of Garfield CountyGarfield County Courthouse 109 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs, CO Re: l,os Amigos Ranch Filing 6-l,0 Honorable County Commissioners: As you know, this firm represents Col-orado Mountain CoIIege. CMC Vice President Robert H. Spuhler and I appeared at the AprilL3, 1998 County Commissioners' hearing regarding Los Amigos Ranch Filing 6-l-0. We expressed CMC's overall support of Los Amigos'application, but stated that the College is concerned that a Iarge number of individuat septic systems may negatively impactthe quality of the Spring VaIIey aquifer, which supplies domestic water to CMC, Los Amigos Ranch, and others. At the time of the April 13, l-998 hearing, w€ had just received the April l-0, L998 report by John Kaufman of Mclaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd., and had not had an opportunity to evaluateit. Since that time, w€ have had CMC's engineers Jerorne Gamba & Associates, fnc., review the Mclaughlin report. Mr. Gamba concludes that the Mclaughlin report is the more credible of the reports submitted to the County, and recommends in favor ofcentralized tertiary sewage treatment. See attached letter. In addition, we have read the report of Garfield County Engineer Robert B. Szrot dated April L7, l-998, which reviewed allof the prior reports and recommends central sewage treatment. Based on the foregoing, CMC respectfully opposes the approval of individual septic systems for Los Amigos RanchFilings 6-10. CMC believes it r^rould be feasible to provide central sewagetreatment for Los Amigos Ranch Filings 6-l-0 through the Spring Va11ey Sanitation District, as was contemplated in the District'soriginal Service P1an. Discussions are presently underway withthe Spring Valley Sanitation District, Los Amigos Ranch, Colorado Mountain College, Lake Springs Ranch, and regarding futuretertiary treatment of sewage from the Spring Valley area. t Board of County Comrnissioners of Garfield County April 27 , l-998 Page 2 CMC would note that several other developments are planned or likely to occur in Spring Valley. It is probable that some of these developers wilI seek ipproval for individual septic systems. The College is concerned that if the County approves iiaiviauat septic systems for Filings 6-10 of Los Amigos Ranch-, it will come under intense pressure to approve the same for other developments. A proliferatj-on of individual septic systems would increase the risk or extent of injury to the Spring Va]ley Aquifer. We understand that the County has recently committed to participate in the devetopment of a comprehensive Water Quality iuan.gemlnt plan to rninimiZe ammonia and nitrate contamination of the Roaring Fork. In light of this commitment, CMC believes that centralized tertiary treatment is the only reasonable and prudent alternative for this area of the County. In conclusion, cMc opposes the use of individual septic systems for Los Amigos Ranch Filings 6-10, but supports Los Amigos Ranch's overall- development plans. Respectfull-y submitted, 'C/r^ArrL---. Chadwicklenn D.ttorney for Colorado Mountain College pc: Robert H. Spuhler Jerome F. Gamba Lawrence R. Green Lee Leavenworth Kevin Patrick Sherry Caloia John M. Kaufman JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEEBS & LAND SURVEYORS 113 gTH STREET, SUITE 214 P0. Box 1458 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602.1458 PHONE: (970) 945-2550 FAX: (970) 945-1410 Mr. Bob Spuhler Colorado Mountain College P. O. Box 10001 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81 602 Re: Report by John M. l(aufman on Los Amigos Ranch Potential lmpacts on dated 1O April 1998 Dear Mr. Spuhler: 21 April 1998 Ground-Water I have reviewed the report LOS AMIGOS RANCH P.U.D. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON GROUND-WATER FLOW AND OUALITY DUE TO THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS FOR DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL pTepATEd by JOhN M. l(aufman, McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd. dated 10 April 1998. The author of this report does a highly credible job of describing the geologic/hydrologic feature in eastern Garfield County that we all know as the "Spring Valley Aquifer". This aquifer is an excellent water supply source for the Spring Valley Campus of Colorado Mountain College as well as a number of individual homes and land developments, including Los Amigos Ranch. lt is a natural treasure, that if protected, will continue to provide excellent quality water to the present and future residents of the Spring Valley area for ever. The effluent discharge from a large number of ISDS systems into this aquifer system has an extremely high potential for degrading the natural, very high water quality in the aquifer. While the degradation process would occur and intensify over time, as the ISDS systems were constructed and operated, the deleterious effect on the water quality would be irreversible. lf this aquifer system becomes polluted, the capitol and operating costs of treating the water to return it to drinking water quality will far exceed what the cost would have been for collecting and properly treating the sewage in the first place. Every effort should be made to convince the Garfield County Board of Commissioners that any waste water discharged to the aquifer, from this time forward, must first receive tertiary treatment so that the discharged effluent can virtually meet drinking water standards. tf ully, Jerome F. Gamba P.E. & L.S. 5933 il**( I LOS AMIGOS RANCH DESIGN STANDARDS AND MANAGEMENT PI.AN FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS A. Purooses The purpose of the Design Standards is to establish advanced design practices which shall apply to the installation of onsite waste water treatment systems ("Systems"). The purpose of the Management Plan is to provide effective management and operation of the Systems. The Management Plan provides a funding mechanism for inspections and routine maintenance of the Systems. lt also provided mechanisms to insure that necessary repair or replacement of the Systems is performed in a timely manner. The Management Plan is not intended to provide for common ownership of the Systems, nor to provide @mmon funding for construction, repair or replacement of the Systems. B. Responsibility For Design Standards And Manaoement Plan The Design Standards and Management Plan shall be the responsibility of the Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association, lnc. (the "Association"). The Architectural Review Committee of the Association will be responsible for insuring that System construction conforms to the Design Standards. The Association shall retain a qualified operator to perform inspections and routine maintenance and to advise the Association when pumping, repair or replacement of a System is necessary. C. Funding The Association shall adjust it's Architec{ural Review fees as necessary to pay for implementation of the Design Standards in the initial constuction of Systems. The Association will collect, as a yearly fee, sufficient funds to pay for the inspection and routine maintenance of Systems and administration of the Management Plan. The necessary pumping, repair or replacement of the Systems, as determined by the Association in its sole discretion shall be the obligation and financial responsibility of each individual homeowner. D. Desion Sfandards Systems shall conform to the following specifications wherever praclically feasible. 1. Tanks - All septic tanks shall be sized for a minimum of four bedrooms. All tanks shall have effluent fitters at the ouflet and provide for dosing of the absorption fietd. The top of tanks or risers shall be within 4 inches of the surface to allow pumping of all chambers. 2. Treatment - All Systems shall utilize Trickling Filters to lower BOD, suspended solids and nitrate levels. 3. Fields - All absorption fields shall be sized for a minimum of three bedrooms. Trench segments with at teast 6 feet of separation shall be used whenever practically feasible. A minimum of three similarty sized tencfr segments should be installed with altemating values or a distribution box that altovrrs isolation of each segment. Monitoring pipes shall be installed at the far end of each trench segment to allow inspection of field condition. lf a bed must be used a single dosed zone is acceptable. lf mounding is required to establish 4 feet of suitable soil, a single Pressure dosed zone is acceptable. lf a bedbr mound is used, a minimum of two monitoring pipes shall be installed at the far end of the bed or mound. E.. lnspections Routine inspections shall be performed bi-annualty for two years following installation of a System. Thereafter, routine inspecfions shall be performed annually. Additional inspections shall be performed as deemed appropriate by the qualified operator. -{40,"4*bztq'il) uv I ndividual Homeowners Responsibilities 1. Remit to the Association in a timely manner the yearly fee for inspection and routine maintenance, the pumping fee as required, and any charges for enforcement actions taken by the Association. 2. Provide access to the System for purposes of inspection, routine maintenance, pumping and any enforcement action by the Association. 3. Provide 11x17 as-built drawing of the System showing lot number, street address northerly direction, scale and the location of the residence, driveway, sewer pipe from the residence, tank, . absorption fields and monitoring pipes. 4. lnitialty install and subsequentty repair or replace defeciive Systems, as required by the Association, in accordance with the Design Standards and applicable Garfield County Health Codes. 5. Complete necessary repairs or replacement of defective Systems, as determined by the Association in it's sole discretion, within 30 days of written notice of a defective condition or such longer time set forth in the notice. As soci ati o n Re s po n si bi I itie s 1. Administer the implementation of the Design Standards and operation of the Management Plan. 2. Set yearty fees and determine pumping charges in a manner that adequately funds the Management Plan. , -/n.1/ 'o - it \ 3. Retain the services of qualified personnel to perfdrm inspections, rdritine maintenance, and advise the Association regarding necessary pumping and repairs or replacements of individual Systems. 4. Retain the services of a tank pumping company to perform necessary pumping. 5. Bill individual homeoarners as needed and issue notices of defective condition as determined to be appropriate by the Association, in its sole discretion. 6. Retain records of all inspections, maintenance, pumping, repairs, replacement, and enforcement actions. Enforcement 1. The Association shall take the necessary action to collect sums that are over due and unpaid. This may include the imposition of late charges ancUor interest overdue sums as determined to be appropriate by the Association. 2. ln the event a homeovvnerfails to repair or replace a defective condition in the time set forth in the written notice, the Association shall have the authority to take any or all of the following actions until the defeclive condition is repaired or replaced. A. Fine the responsible homeowner a sum not to exceed $1000/day. B. Curtailwater service to the responsible homeowners residence. C. Contract for the repair or replacement of the defestive condition on behalf of the responsible homeomrer, advan@ sums on behalf of the responsible homeowner at the rate of 14oh, and impose an administration fee not to exceed $1000. 3. ln the event the Association fails to enforce these Design Standards and Management Plan, Garfield County shall have the right to take such action against the Association as it deems necessary. I F. /zw-// 1:-4wrvs/*1v'7';; /r:ffi, ?*.<*e /letu/fu,*otu' Wry;; /26*'v"2 @ Wright Water Engineers, lnc. B lB Colorado Ave. P O. Box 219 Glenwood Sprjngs, Colorado B I 602 (97O) 945-7755 rEL 1970) 945-9210 FM (303) 893-r508 DENVER DIRECI LINE May 19, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Regulatory Office & Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3303 Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan - Additional Review of ISDS Issues Dear Mark: This letter presents additional review comments on information submitted after Aprll27 , t998 by the applicant and adjacent property owners regarding ISDS issues for the proposed Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan. The additional information includes: o Revised well location and data map for Attachment Aprrl 23, 1998 letter report which was missing (WWE's) copy of the report. A in of Resource Engineering's Wright Water Engineers' Report titled "Los Amigos Ranch PUD Filings 6 Through l0Individual Wastewater Treatment Systems Supplemental Documentation" dated May 13, 1998 prepared by Resource Engineering. Attachments include Design Standards and Management Plan for Individual sewage Treatment Systems and Orenco Systems manufacturer data on trickling filters for ISDS. May 13, 1998 letter to Sherry Caloia from Mclaughlin Water Engineers (MWE) regarding Los Amigos Ranch and Septic Effluent Studies in Summit County. May 13, 1998 letter to Sherry Caloia from MWE regarding well information discrepancies in ISDS analyses. Our review comments and in our April 13, 1998 and Aprrl27, 1998 letters remain BOULDER (303) 473'9s00 unchanged. Our comments on the above material is presented below. DENVER (303) 480-r 700 DURANGO 19701 259-7411 The systems shall conform to the adopted specifications in every case, notwherever practically feasible. However, this does not preclude morestringent standards if applicable or appropriate. JoHN A. THULSoN E-EilE6-ililEiuu, un. ScoTT BALcoMts LAWRENCE R..GREEN TtMorHY A. THUr-soN LoRr J. M. SATTERFTELD DrLa.NEY & ftAr,coMBr P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LA.w P. O. DRA\^/ER 79O 8 1 8 Cor,oRADo A1rErYrrE GT,TTNWOoD SPRINGS, CoI-oRADo 81 602 970.945.6546 970.945.8902 OF CouNSEL: RoBEFrr DELANEY KENNETH BALCoMB EDWARD B. oLszEwsKr DAvrD SANDoVAL OENDY M. HEISeL Teleohone: Faciimile: May 13, 1998 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mark Bean Garfield County Department of Building and Planning 109 8'h Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 . Re: Dear Mark: Application for Preliminary Plan Approval Los Amigos Ranch Planned Unit Development, Filing 6-10/County Commissioners hearing of May 19' 1998. Pursuant to the timeline established by the County Commissioner I have included herewith for review by the County Commissioners and County staff, five copies of the following entitled documents to be introduced by Los Amigos in support of their application at the County Commissioners hearing of May 19, 1998, to wit: I Correspondence ofMay 13, 1998 from John Currier, Resource Engineering, [nc. to Greg Boecker addressing the appropriateness of individual wastewater treatment system (ISDS) use within the Los Amigos Ranch PUD under the proposed land use plan. Proposed Management Plan governing the installation and maintenance of the above- described ISDS systems within the Los Amigos Ranch PUD. Said Management Plan will be incorporated within the Declaration of Protective Covenants pursuant to supplement declaration. Article titled the Orenco System Septic Tank Filter in Colorado by Roger J. Schaffer P.E. At the May 19, 1998 meeting, Ed Church of E.O. Church, [nc., will present testimony regarding the use of septic tank trickling filters, the installation of which Los Amigos will incorporate within their application. The article by Mr. Schaffer addresses the installation and operation of these systems generally and is submitted to the Commissioners and County staffas background information to Mr. Church's presentation. 2 J. DEr,alYEY & BAr,coMB, P.C. ATTORIYEYS AT IJAW By copy of this letter I have provided copies of the above-entitled documents to Sherry Caloia on this date. Very truly yours, TAT:kjk Enclosure DELANEY & BALCOMB, Wright Water Engineers, lnc. 8l B Colorado Ave. P.O. Box 219 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 (970)945-7755 IEL 19701 945-9210 FM {3031 893-r608 DENVER DTRECT UNE April 13, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Regulatory Office & Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3303 RE: Ios Amigos Preliminary Plan - ISDS Impact Dear Mark: This letter presents additional corlments on the April 6, 1998 report by Resource Engineering regarding proposed ISDS systems for Los Amigos. Analvsis We believe the Resource report overstates the conclusion with assuming phrases such as "no risk," "low levels," "increase slightly," and "well below standards." There is an impact on the increase of nitrate levels and it could be between two and seven times the existing levels. However, the total cumulative, and diluted, concentration of constituents in the regional groundwater aquifer is estimated to be less than State and EPA drinking water standards. Desigrr Standards and Management Plan We recommend the Design Standards and l,{anagement Plan presented in Attachment B of the Resource Engineering April 6, 1998 report be included in any approvals for this project. In addition, we recommend the Plan be modified to include the following: o All ISDS systems shall be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and shall meet applicable County' Regulations and the "state of the practice" at the time of construction. In addition. the design shall also include the following criteria [as given in the Plan and with WWE's recommendations below]. o All tanks shall have ptppgtly sized effluent filters. o The 2l3trl;i,re use, 1/3 rested bed concept is good and will increase the effectiveness of the system. However, we are concerned about proper operation and exactly how this will be implemented. This requires more detail on operation and, in our opinion, requires that the absorption field be oversized by 1/3 to meet hydraulic loading requirements. D5TJVER 1303) 48Gr 700 DURANCO (970) 259-741t BOULDER 13031 473-9500 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office April 13, 1998 Page 2 Design criteria should include considerations for minimizing impacts and protecting groundwater for other constituents of concern. "Qualified personnel" to perforrn inspections should be defined in more detail. This person should have professional rvorking knowledge of ISDS systems and be certified by the State for ISDS systems r, iren such certification becomes available. A brief annual surnmary report of inspections, repairs, and replacement should be compiled and submitted to the County. Please call if you have any questiors or ns:rC additional information. Very truly yours, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. MJE/dIf 92t-047.040 By: Apr-2\-9A O1:2oP Stella Archuleta ' 97cJ-945-7745 P -O2t.y April 17, 1998 Re: Los Amigos Ranch Filing GlO (LAR) Waste Treatment Options Facts: l) LAR is situated on soils of predominantly har4 highly fractured rock forrnations (basalt) and highly fractr:red sandstone (maroon). 2) LAR will have approxirnately 165 srngle family lots of 3.07 acres/lot ovcr an area of 503 acres. There will also be 4 rural lots of 223.5 acres (cumulative?). 3) Hepwonh-Pawlak Geoteck Soil testing of 2l exploration pits spaced throughout the prcoerty resulted in the following: a) No holes were dug in excess of l0 feet b.) 13 holes had refirsal (hit rock or large boulder) at less than seven feet - of these, 8 had refusal at less than 5 feet. c.) Topsoil layers are tpically 3 feet or less. 4) CTL Thompson identified 2 geologic faults and a slide area on the property. Others Opinions: a) Lincoln Devorc 1982: "shallow bedrock is highly fractured and permeable, which will affect the [rotential for individual seDtic svstems and mav nccmsitate the use of a central sePtic svstem.' b.) Hepworth Pawlak 1997: "Dense hard basalt is expected at relarively shallow dcpths and rlifFcult excavatbn conditions should bc expccted". "...exploratory pis excavated in the general proposed developrnent area consist of 1-3 feet of topsoil overlying nil-7 feet of clay and silt". "...it has been our experience in the area that local percbed groundwater rnay develop duing times of heavy precipitation or seasonal nuroff, An under drain system should be piovrdedto protect bclow grade constnrction...from wetting and hydrosatic. ,'* pressure buildup". shgllow basalt rock arees'. c.) Resource Engineering 1998: "...there is no risk of sroundwater contsmination as a result of properl.v desicned. installed and mrintained individusl sewase treatment systems in Los Amieos Ranch'. 'The opinion presented here is based on availiable hydrogeologic information. ...Further invesigation of the hydrogeologic conditions is beyond the scope of this document and in ou opinion is not warranted for this investigation". "Individual Westeweter System Criteria -l)Use of septic tank efluent fi.lters. 2) Use of leach field dosing systems. 3) Annual individual wastewatcr system inspections..." d.) Mclaughlin Wuer Engineers, Ltd.: 'Documented cascs of widespread ground-water contarnination from septic $ystems have been in areas where lot sizes ftmge from less than one quarter of an acre to ttrec acres". "Shallow ground-water flow above the Roaring Fork river valley is largely controlled by significant tacture permeability as opposed to inter-granular perrneability..." "tlpen voids and caverns can be scen in many outcrops..." "As a result, high-nitrate water from thc septic leach fields mav concentrate near the water for the development. Mounding or other ensineered systems may be rcquired in ' lo-- 2L -sa Stel la Archuleta 970-945-7745 P-03 table". "Use-of individuel rcsidential develoom.ent is not rccommended as proposed and should not be aooruved by Gerlield Countv oflicials". e.) Wright Water Engineers, Inc. 1998: "Therc is 8n imDact o levels and it could be between two to seven times the eristing levels. However, the total cumulative, and dilute4 concentration of constituents in the regional g'onndwatcr aquifer is cstimated to be less than State and EPA drinking water standards." "...r /e recornrrend the Plan be modified to include the following: 1) All ISDS systems shall be desigped by a Colorado P.E. ...meet..."state-of-the-practice".2) AII tanl6 shall have properly qi-.d efluent filters. 3) The 2/3 vx,,l/3 rested bed concept is good...however, we are concerned about prop€r implenrentation.. 4) Desrgrr criteria should include consideration for minimizing impacts and protecting groundwater... 5) Qrralified personnel to perfomr inspections should be defined in more detail 5) A b,rief annual summary report of inspections, repairs, and replacement should be compiled and submined to the counry. County Engineer's Opinion: In rural areas with deep granular soil types, individual nonevaporative septic systems are the most efficient form of wase treatnrcnt. The existing parameters in this situation are a non-rural eavironrnent (3acreMot) with fractured rock and sandstone structure, verylittle topsoiJ, and adjacent to a flowing wat€rway. There is also an active waste treatment faciliry in close proximity to this location (altbough this plant would nnst likely need upgrading with any added flows). The percolation tests assume general homogeneor.rs soil types and I don't feel that in areas of fracnres end rock formations that these should be decisive in the decision making process. The 1995 Long Report (attached-Resource Engineering) sates nitrogen removal is primarily accomplistred at the soil gravel interface. With minimum soil and arcas of questionable gravel tlre existrng location would be unable to rernove significant nirogen naturally. In the absence of 'han-made" solutions, groundwater pollution is unavoidable if conventional individual s€,ptic systerns are used. There is existing technology which would frcilitate individual waste treatment: l) mounding: adds more topsoil to provide additional biological interactive surface area downside - need to bring in soil 2) evapotranspiration: gives each resident their own sewage lagoon downside - odor, unsightty, needs rnaintenance for biological processes 3) biological filters: renrove nitrogen at the waste source downside - rnaintenarrce to assure proper biological processes, prevent clogging 4) laryer tanks: hold effluent for longer detention tirnes (optimum puri$ing efficiency is obtained after about 6 weeks). downside - room and depth for tank, excavation 5) Plug Flows: release efluent to leach field at preset periods to assure even distribution in soils. downside - control system 1s de rhis properly, maintenance Apr-ZL-98 O1:21P Stella Archuleta 97(J-945-77a5 P -O4 Ttre concept of additional nitrogen rernoving filters, yearty inspection and rnaintenance, site specific enginccring, aad annual reports and documents to the county places a considerable burden (each ard every year) on both the horneowner and the county. In additioru e^ch specific fuilding site could feasibly have a completely di:fferent septic system of varying degrees of cornponents and technology - which could, at a later date, confourd efforts to standardize environmental discharge s. Recommendation: Although it would be possible to have individrnl waste treatnrent systems on each lot, this option "assumes" that the lot owner would be technically knowledgeable and skilled at rnaintaining the biological process of their system year round, year a.fter year. It also assrunes that a propertv owuer would not mind living next to their neighbor's sewage lagoon or irccept a large rnound of soil not native to the area- Larger tanks would create larger despoiled wregetated excavations. In addition, the county would be frc€d with 164 new yearly reports on each system's output, in addition to monitoring aad certifying technicians capable of instaUing and repairing an unknown variety of systems. I would recornmend installation of a low pressue sewer ejection system whereby each property owner would prucbase a septic purnping unit ($2,000-$4,000) which would hold and pump efluent up or down hill to a central flexible sewage line. This central sewage line (insalled by the developer) is made of flexible low cost plastic bel and spigot prprng or pofwinyl continuous piping arlC would follow &e grourd contour with a minimum of excavation As this system is pressurized, the need for lift stations is eliminated and all residcnts would tie in to the existing gavity qystem or could empty at another system treatment frcility. This system has successfully been used to assure pristine environmental compliance throughout the Lake Tahoe area Garfield County Engineer Apr-2'L-98 O1:21P Stel la Archu'leta 970-945-77As P. 05 1..., GOULDS Model 3887 lnstallation, hntion dd tlaintsnanGe hrstructions I lmFOETA.rT 1. lnspect unit for damage. 2. Electrical supply must be a separate branch circuit equip- pect with proper fuses or circuit breakers, wire size, etc., conform- ing to National ElectricalCode plus local codes. Power supply voltage, phase and controls must match pump narneplate requirements. 3. Ahrays disconnect electrical power supply when handling pump or switches. 4. Do not use pump in swimming pools or hazardous liquids. 5. Liquid temperature not to exceed 160"F. (71oC) 6. Do not remove ground prong or use extension cords. 7. Use basins as otfered in Goulds Catalog. II Rrmp & Piping 1. Thread discharge pipe into discharge connection. lf a check valve is used try to avoid installing it vertically. Position horizontally or at a 45o angle with valve pivot on top. This guards against solids lodgrng on valve preventing it from opening. Drill a %s" hole in dis- charge pipe 2" above pump discharge connection to prevent air locking the pump. A gate valve should be installed in the systern, after the check valve, to permit removal of pump or check valve for servicing. A union should be installed be tween check valve and pump. 2. Thrcephoe pumps must be checked for proper rotation after wiring is complete. Rotation must be counterc,lockwise look- ing into pump suction. catrllon: Do not attempt to feea for rolation with fingers. Rotat- ing impeller will cause severe ,nlury. 3. Singl+phare pumps have built- in thermal overload protection with automatic reset. Thrse- phase units must be protected by a starter wilh proper overload protectioh. See Table. Itr Basin Basin should have a sturdy bot- tom to give legs of pump adequate support. Leg height elevates pump above bottom of basin to allow wastes to reach suction opening. When using basins without hubs, attach 4" cast iron inlet hub to drain line as requrred. ln case of duplex basins, seal second hub if not used. trt Basin Cover Remove protective strip from gas- ket and press onto recessed pbrtion of basin rim. With a pointed tool,poke holes_through gasket into taF ped holes. Oo not damage threads. Route electrical cords through threadect into ftange provided with Dasln cover. If Hanual Operation This is accomptished by manually switching power on or ofl to the ' pump. On pumps equipped with a molded plug, insert into a suitable outlet controlled by a switch. Where a separate cont{oller is used the"Hand-off-Auto'lswitch is turned to "Hand" operation. U Autornatic Operation 1; Dlaphragm Control Switctr. (ALS2-1), (ALS2-2) and (ALS2-4) A pressure activated switch provid- ing automatic operation with 6" differential in liquid level. Turns on when liquid is 'l0" above bottom of switch and turns oll al 4" above bottom of swrtch. Crillon: This control switch has a vent which must be left unob- structed and protected from moisture, dirt, or foreign material. Mount electrical cord so vent tube poants downward. 'h HP, Vz HP, 115V or 230V, 1 O pumps may be controlled d:rectly by the switch. %-1 HP, 11/z HP, 1 @ units require a contactor. 3 @ unrts require a slarter. 2 Merorry Swilchs Mercury switches are single float switches that as the liquid level rises or fails, the float changes angle until the mercury switch rnakes or breaks the circuit. Fit basin cover over discharge pipe. Power cords are s€ated witl.isfjtii rubber stopp€r. Rubber rrng isplaced over discharge pipe and compressed bctween pipe ancl cover by the llange (chamfered side down) to form a seal. Vent pipe is Funret Ovcrlordl Sircr Slerlr Slrc 00, 14BF32ACB1 fao.a{ I{o.HP Volt Xartarr E x wso5328 ws05348 230 839 K3.| d60 E20 K21 WSO732B wso7348 230 E4l K32 460 E31 KN wsrq328 WS1O34B I zfi E4?K3/t .160 833 K?4 ws 10328H wsl$4aH I zfi €5t x43 460 E4l K32 no.ltrlcfr Io(I A+.lr!a.Olttm ta.a HP nDel ELadcd Rrhc rlll9 CqrilF't,GT ALS2-3 NO tl-5 Srngre ot fhrcc Phraa Bara Lo.ra ALs2-5 I ^at*, ! ALs2-7 i Y6 r r5v si^gta Phag 230v Singtt F\e$;"- -lhnPha fhtl. Prcnec, Flug 8.li Latlr AL52.9 r15V SiaebPnE Tlnrhona- Ptug - (.ltaatt - Apr- 2L -98 OL :22P Ste I I a Archu'l eta 97cJ- 945 - 77A5 , 11 MANUAL TESTING rro simutate atternator,i \ operaaonsequence). $ t-r For case ol installation and salcty nrrls<tnr, wa nrcommoad npnual tartlng of lloet switch opeation prlorto attachlng llosts to dl*lnrgo pipo in th. pump chamber. c L Figure 1 - Three Float lnstallation Figure 2 - Four Float lnstallatlon Y- .- -''o tr tri iffV't' 1 ri 1. Make sure all flet *ritches are in ofl psitbn SEE : i I FIGURE l, psitbn of lag/atarm tlat.n i, i 2. Tum on pwer sourca. The contrcl panel antol + , .. switch sltoukl be on and both HOA switcha shotld 4 ( J" be in automatb psnion. 1 O*, 3. Tip common stap fl@t to on position. SEE FIIGURE- _ t 3, TUUSTRATION A. -< C ' 4. While common stop flet remains tippd, tip lerrd : : i float to on pcition. At this pint, one pump aN ona i J i pump run light will tum on.{ * k S. Retum lerrd ftoatto off position. Retum @mmon t IS, stop ltetto oft position. Activatad pump aN pump .: i - run indiator light willnow be otf. { I 6. Repeatsteps No. 3 and 4. The second pump ud ..d T pump run inditztor ltght willtum on. Repat sevea! i { ilmes to €l*cure altemation of pumps. For a foue { H float iostallatlon go to stcp 9. A ,H, Z. Tip the @mmon stop float, the led ftoat aN taglfr alarm flcrrto theon position. Both pumps, aN the r;;trifiCIA'IP OETAIL(SrFgvt s) FIo,,t il,.,tr,l},/tk,n gr/un E lt z hilh l.,l,cl abn .1,5,btn- To nsnll aWlfr&flt,syc0'/rr, ^rur:r nri,,E,a{[lfurq*of t, lkI,Ltlay, b1 t b ik/',trdpt &vt @rmon s@ nc{[ E ptfr b flro!ffiA unet lN, lollffi Dy 0t t.gt t ql o},, wrn (ry,r,tuu bdfitit l s'tp utc tD 9fip lv a l1&h q loy total syAfiL alarm syslam will be agerating.8. Both pumps, pump run lights, ard abrm system will rematn running until allflats ara retumd to otf position. The complae srrstem will be off atthis pint. Four float installatlon only thile altemate pump is running (ammon slop and lead fioats remain tippd), tip lag fbat to on psi(nn. Both pumps will now be operating and will renrrrin on. Now tip aldrrn lloat to on psition. Both pump aN alarm systems will be openting. 10. Tip abrm flut to otl position. Alarm system witt sh& ofl. ll.Both pumps will remain running until all remainhg lloats are tippd to off psition. Complate syaem will be off. ,ALTEBNaTE FouR FLzAT ARRANGEMENT To indicate alatm conditlon befora taE pump tum on, fiount tJe alaan lloai he*r. t;t tht tt-.-L and tag flcg,ts,- Float rurii:;; rimains !l,r' .lir,?, dF - ,rn on wiing dbgtam. gn ''t-ht.Il rlptnfurc'\ lwsrettaTpN tNsrRUCTtoNs - page 2 ( Control switches with pipe clamps taotuatILili *N ,oPa.qt ,IEEEAA caa(I{ st?,Pa-o4t P. o9 _- TECHNOLOGY INTAI j Ol:22P Ste] la Archu'l eta PUHP UNIT NO.I TEE PUMP UNIT NO.2 MANHOLE CENTERED ON PUMPS, lNcL lt{ G E I.IEPA L DISI'R ICT '*- G. pELL IN DIVIDUAL PUMP\Co,*. MANN--..-.-- -_ 970- 945 - 7745 UMP 8AS IN P -O7 DISCHARGE pIpIli. . tt") \. NOTE: Pressure IlnesshalL be slzed co provtdea minirnum velocicy of zfeec. per secpnd. - i ! / E VILLACE ll/Pl?Cti/Elr4El.JT IGID METAL PIPE/ITH FLOAT SWITCHES OIS CHASGE EITH ER OTH UMPS OFF STATION DETAIL i.riPl?VEO CY ATE VAIYE ..v--vunLrat x6rEF galul<S l rJ r JloJ.{uu:,7E6 PAGE ?/14 Strucbrrel Feahres Tbe ryiorral area eocoryassing the ls Aoigos RarcLpropeqy is o a sballoc/ srnEaual beachth^r lies beweea seveml foH+ Afts, ard uplifu. Tbe srucarnl bcocb has underg@s signific-rrt deforuati<r dgring te Neqgeoe (Mioc€Dc and Plioccnc paioas oftUe T€niary)- t uu$al strucuual ftdrrcs ofeis dc,foraafuu t'+ affect the mmence ad msv@€d of$ouud rrloer iechdc t. 2_' ,. 4. 5. 6. 7. Iinear and arc&uc syuclioai sage, roe with fr,rhed limbs; iEtrrlsive cao1,css b€s,cgo se&{t#-y ftuaticns; sctsoforthogmi fiuls; ciredar,dliPtical,rccErgular,aodiregularrydspedborrl{ikestnrctrratto4hsofirarying sireq a large, a$rt4e, haE gzboa rrhose flon was ocarpied by a lake rrr*il da2!s6d !y hornesre-rlers (ie; Spring Vaileyx valkyaicliues; and complaly trornE4 highly brokco aad brcociaed blocks of randonly qieaed bedrock (pteisoceae ail/or lale Tcrdary collapce debris). Ilese disinctive satrrrrat Gaurres arc perrrasive rpherever erqoritis rocks lic as or nearthe hod surEce- lt{any of tbe surtrral =gs, trorgbs, aad boc/s @iE local}y{erivcd sedimcus ercdd from adjaceor uplands. lv{aay of&ese sedimeas are ddomdbd less 5pthan frs uodcdyiog bcdrodr I}is defomaim is believ€dto be reoictcdto tbe Eagle VaIIEy Evaporite ad orcriyiug d€posirs. Bedrock dderfi2.' 6e Eagle VdleyEvapcitebasDo[be€naftsedbyeesalttecrmisoanddissohtricn- Crrcrphicaily,tbeseumrsral strucurrs have combined 1s 51's4s 3 lz"'dq-pe ftat has tbc cl-"sic cbractccisbs ofl<arsc topograph,-. Opeo voids and caveras caa be seeo inuary outcrops ofth p-gteVallqv E\aporile, aad sinlsdes, sooe qtdte IaEe, have deveJoped in b€drock for-ariec overliug the etaporitic rodss- aldemaryd€psiDsmaybeatrecedby&isuuu$al typeofdefornaio- Ririerterraces areupwarped away Acm modeo rivgr ch2nnels. I-a€g brca4 closcd orucarty doscd depressios aad srales (srbeideace troughs) have devdoped in mauy outc,ash terrac€s- Sir}loies arc hcally aUrndao in srficial dep6its- Drainage peems aDd 6e ext€st of mzrl of the basbfiUiog surfsial deeosits are influeaced by 6e sint&oles ard s$sideoce uu€hs, foidd rivcr rcrraccq ftilded ard grrltd b&odq aDd collapse d6ris- Tler€i@alareaispartofatargertopogaphicdepressimdecoincidesinpartwi&&eareaufierearaporitic rocks lieaoruear&egrundsrffrce. lbcdQrssinisbdievedtobealargecoll"F"ebbclrf,at65resrhed ftom dissofution and flmage of aaporitic rocks fr@ bqea& the area. Neogeae igneous rocks are wdl preserued wieia tte down{roppcd collapse block. Bo& &e tderal exm arvr ansrtr ofvertical collapse is de.6ned by Stl<Ag:al defOrnafim wilhin theNeog€ae igp€ors roc&s. The qmclinal segc, i6lsive c6nF.ts bauteea sedimetaryformatims, or6ogoDal frult ses, bowl-like strncnml trorghr areaEhafgrabea, vallery amiclioes, collapsc dcbrrs, and folded Pleistrce ornq,ash t€fiaccs ocsur wi&is thc collapse block- FFN-as-ro ro:zI l-l<(,rl:IrTLLAUGHLIN krAJ..ER ENGRS I D , 3A34EIOsl766 WrtcrtrLlc Enztir ff.rt) 6848 PAGE E/14 Neogoedeformaticuoftheryhalareainvolves(t)rgimtdoum*o+he<astiltiryofMiocencbasalrflows thd rmcoforoably orrerlie uoderdeiy we${ipplng sditrc@ry formadqrs and (2) a scrics of srbparallel beddingphne s"rE&atclsclyfollowtcbcddiugoftcmodcradyq/esr{ippirysedimemar1rbedsandoGet wertying Neogsae dePcb. The bcddiugalane frula arc dowrhroqrq ro rhe urcsq brn blocts of hsah betweea the furlts dipas mrch as 30 degrees eassand, qpcite thtftc undertying pre+aramib scairncarar-v formatios- This t1,pe of deforaatim can be ecglaincd by dissoluti@ of erraritic rocks ** rmdcrlic &e area on by floviagc oftre arapornes ouard te Roarhg Fork Vailcy. As rhe araporires were reoorrc4 rhe r€i6al areatilted eastc,ard Spslinal sags,tbebourHiternouatuoughsiDbedrodqfiehatfgpb€aofSpringValey, aodrhepreseoce of collapse debris all "a, be qlained by lclly irrtp'rsc srbsideace wi&in tbe r€ioqal collapsc bloclr Feaessshasrraltre5r:rrti.line<aadinrsives€'lirnsnr-ry@c6ztrcprobabtyaresrlofdiapiriso- Folded ounvash Erfirccs arc a Pro&lct o'f ci&er dissohrioa-indrce4 Iocalired srbsideace and/u diapiric proccsses. Ground-TVater FIow Conditions Agcacnalwaler-table oapof,&csauraedbasalnaerscripesequcoceia&evichitvofteLosAmigosRaDch Propctty was devcl@ ad is $fim h FigunE 1- Tbe na uas deveJoped &om static u,atcr{flel t'r€'srtErnelrB in existing wdh dgvarions ofperemitl strean reacbes in Spriag Vailerv, topogtaphi,c ruaps of the r€i@ai arca and 6c gcologlc ry Figure 1)- TLB u,elts nc€'t to con<uuct fig ynT, ale lig.d in Table l. PcdNo. {0806+ Itr06, 2fr7152 ?37151 IJ8OI-F t5t02+ l5r0&F ng 30831 t8l4:a 31599 ]6767 u58?-9J, 2E95$F i[rD Nro. I 3 5 6 7 t 9 IO 11 l4 t5 I5 B Table I Lorlc NEEVTTTS/RE8$, !.MNE29/T6See8flr NSf.Iu/D/T7S/BttlCr l.nrralc/D/T7s/Pttw Ntrt/SCr4T7S/&fg NUSilr7{/T7S/R I}W !{WS1V/zvT7S/"8tfl, Nw/s!r/4T7s/R8tsr NCTS{ry4lrrSlR Slv SE/SW!TTS/Rff3W NE/SqI2&T5S/X88\Y NEA{W{/T7S/Rt8g' sF/swzuT6s/Rt€w swarF.29lT6s/R&lw 59r5 6608 6596 6@ &4 6tr9 &4 *2, @7 698t) @52 6rm 6904 I u: JsJ{ula:J./EiEi PAGE 9/14 Thc uaccr+ablc rnap indicacs tbrc is a grur&raer*.6 b..'pth rbc rpland alea locaed betweea Splrrug Vallryaad&eRcrrrngFo*River. Iactrervordrfrela"dtobeeapiedbytbeLosAmigosRaachpropertv is a uard r&rge zone. Crrold water rrcves away from tre Eo|Ed in all diredirrs wi& a laural hydraulicgndiaeat &eV ranges from approcimarely 0.OI to 0.09 ftcUfcct Tlcmo6t,gEillcgradi.ms are locared m te wesq nor6, and eag sides oftbe mrn{ Tbe seepest gradicms acu o thcsog& si& ofrhe rnarnd coircidem wie qeeP grorad slopes- Th€ variable gradierns indicae uaasorissiviries of Ee basal frrmaioa rary dilEdiouafly anrl ap sUT rctr12tty coo5oiled- Peremiai'srr&ce flows in Spring Va[sy (i.e.; Spriog Creck) 8r'c rtraitraincd by grmd-uiaeylicchzfge irro &c Iaostrinc scdimccs frco &e aorteas and,-<r and fiom vres and sorhwes- A grornd.uzrer divide in Spring Vale,v ocans near the sorb€ast comer of,seqicu 32, T6S,R tsW- Nor& of&e divide grould crder flolsrcrthrrardintsvalkT'toSpringCredr Sqreoftedivi&grurldqiderfbcrtoqrardrbernrruicipal wdlfiddnearColonadoliloumaiuCollcgcandtoCaleCrc*. Thewllfisldisalsosuppliedb,ys$thca$Erty grouod-qaer tnovelocst toor &c upland area wberc&eproposed LosAmigos Ranch dendcpuem js to be Iocated. ROTEI\TTIAL IMPACTS ON GROTJI\D WATER Prcsemed in FiSurc 2 is frc Lc Amigos Ratrc.h Oevetopoeu P.U.D. ahog wrh rbe gpoeral c,aer€ble mzp sbwn iE FiSpre 1- The Ins Amigos Ranch devdopmea qvill chartge rbe lel ground-vater cooditioss. Thc rumicipalwellslooednearteco[egewiUbensedosrpptywaerotcdadopneml6lArrnesicprrrposes- r andscaPeirrigatioartivityando'citenscofiodividulDoretaporaivesepticryseoswiltinseasetelocal grormd vaer rccharge. As a rcflh, bvds will rise- Spriags Eay €E€rge in 6e orherrrise Aha"eral dniuages that flon' sorrtrestedythroryh th€ aeugoemet- The apex ofte grouod-varcr morod wtll-likely shift to tb uordeast in tte diruiou of greaeruansoaissivitbs- As fte nrnniiFal udls p"'nfr gr€fifr 4orms of glo@d wzler !o srpply frc d,Tnesti. 'prs of&e Ocrctoprneuf grcacr drawdcrum u tbe wdl fieid will ocerr the ilcreasEd &acdom at fu wcll fidd and nomcasrerty shifi of frc grmd-rraer mood will combinc to iuscase 6e or/erall cufrutioa of grurod-*rer flcrs, frorn I.os Aoigc RaEcL darelqmat ,rea5 5s m""icTul wdl fidd- The am@ of grumd-waer recharge fut wiil mrr tom seasod hAsqe irigarim wrlll be a frsctim of v€fiati@ t]?€sl irtq4cd aeas, and qa&rng prarrices. Tbe sceady-scae recbargc coribrnio fim th€ prctposed .r'+te Effit/aporeive scgic systeos wi[ bc approrioaely 30 acrafea peryear- This vohrme was coqru@de.s'mi'gauarrcmgedaitydo'nesticwasrestreamorf45 gailmspcrpcrsoo(BA 19EO),3.5 persos per siryle-finily resideuce as per te decreed -rrgnent-tiou fla for ' I &rrclopmcu, and I 6t upirs as pef te I"os Amigc Rach P.U-D. At each singl+Amily r€sidcacE this re&rge wiII occur oy€r a lrry small arca or alog a shon hrried Eerch &rcugh sballow Derral or imported $rfrce soils- Affer the cfluear passcs thr-rgh 6e sballow strr&ce soils' it wrll pcrcolare rapidly ido tbe imercmected fractrres and joims offre a a! wa I EA garg^ _ 6TG- 1U-JQ AA: <T, t.EU',I: TTLLAUGHLIN WATEH ENGRS I D, 3O348€tS766 PAGE IO./ 14 basalt 6rEatia- Movemeat throrgh ec basalt wiII bc n4*r as ccqared rvifr erm coarse alluvial scdims srch as gravel. Nitrat€conceaEdionsiEr€orrflorirstulanasqeirrigatiowillbeafimctioofvqearr:ot,"€s,irrig,ed arcas, @d irdividal ftnilizaim ad irigarioa pracices. Tbercarcaosrytictankdcsig,requireoeorsspecifcallye*ablisbcdtoedascchEhhels ofuitrogealaoral in dmccic ulssr8lrratgr. Designs &ar Provide ercellp.'t sou+rhr;a separaoon easrre Ioqrercoceffiations of, aiaogca associaed wift srryeodea scflids. Orgaldc airogso iE donesic wirstenzt€r readily uoacrgpa accoqpo<itlos to arurmia in segtic 'ts- According !o trc EPA (19s0), abfit 2 to t0 percec of ec 1gEI uiuogea &@ the houe uay be reoorrcd iu ttc scptic uak approsimarely 65 to 7s pesc€at of frc rotal uirogeoinsepticgrl"+tuereisiaeeanmoaia-aitrogcufrrm,i*fic.d.gasiguificarlardofdecompoaitim of orgauic tritroges- Nitrificado of srytic ta* efrucus ocarnr rEadily within ",,,.t filters. DuriBg rcad-v dl6e tilnoil1b covened tg1itrale. The total dtr€ea cooccotratim of 6e scptic'ra8k efHl,E r rill lftety aYerage * n, qil (EpA lgto). Becar,se of sballow soils ad the furdnuiic properties ofmc basafr furruio, oly ryligible aneouaiou of orgadc aod amuouia species ofriupgEn nay be pcsible. As the cfilcd from rhe indivieul septic leach 6elds flows through &ejoi"t" and fiacares oftbc basalt fmnratioo, ooly,";.;,,-r br€sal disfp€Gioa will ocqg. In<+-rl, florrs will r-Le ote ryFarauce ofnarrow charaels ofhigh-f,iuate gruod nater imer-filgcred wie laroril ch-*"cls of lopcrqitrae gro@d srder. As $at€d abornc, soac offre efircal from 6e proposed devdopmeat wiII flow bac& o tbe rnrniciC well Setd The presence of vdcauic-ash inte{beds aDd basa6 frarnres partiaily filled lvirh auremary.e.Itun€"rs ado6Erd6risurayinhr-birthcyertical disper:sicn oftbcefiuo- As a resrh, high-ilitrate crder fi6r tbc septic icach fidds Eray csr.qn:afe ucar the caEr tabla CONCLU$ONS AI{D RECOMMEI\{DA^TIONS Tbe prcposed derury and uumber of isdividual mneragoraive sqric systems d 6e Los Amigos RaEch ProP€4y arc high (164 cn 3.l-acre lcns) aad are uot fivorable to prevcgt grorrd-narer co@EioadoL lprnanyareasofthepropceddcr/doee@,srr&cesoilsarethfuqnooexistcul Only&acaz.cdaodjoitrd basalt is ePosed a tbe grmd g6ce- Snch condirims arc Dr ftvorable ro orrcrall s€tric sjx$em oPeration- Surecc soils are .nrle'i2;n by higLly peraeable basaft dryosits urhii provide lick, ifauy, diry6asioq ofthe sepac effueor Sepic e#lueu conceafizrioas ofnitrarc as uitrogctr are ogeoed to average about a5 mgA- l. ) 3. hrN-rs-JQ te:-e r N\Jrl :IlgLArJUnr-rAa wA-r.bx ENGRS Iltr3u3{El0s766 PAGE tt/t4 4- Tbeproposeduseofindivi&niEDs{iaporarivrsqticryweosarrbelosAmfos Ranchpropertywill signifir,rry increase the rritr=te conrgtar of the grorod'urarer nrpply. h locaEzcd areaE tbe uiEae c@c€Gdi@ as uitrogps of Sallorr g!ilnd vratrr My signific-ntly q1ced I0 mgA the primary dri*iryurarcr scadad- :: .-;' 5- Use ofindivied aocraporative scptic qmcus aa &c Irs Atrrigps Ranch resltarial dcrclopment is ' lotrccctrmesdcdasProPcedadsbouldncrbeapproraedbyCarfiddCogmvofficiaJs. CIOLOGIC TEGENDsjrru@NIr H $ff}qffi,(|},iflsr*ffitrd ffiS#tl*,*;El[f.m.,ln"* El [',][H,li]tr. n* E ml,xXif;t?#I,.F -*, ry ffiry'*It;H,fffi1,@ $il-frm#f"; 0lc d&blw(flC.qrl eld f r &oralr,l.lr,$r,l t:El uEft HLfl.yr0{ flFgtr5fii-l rrr*u il gc.r4d tkto@) AU'llA, q}slls @ffi:r f^;-l O{..t I Effi%tf}/ffi I(u r 000dII .ul{tlllH}l lux 0 s,ftloAr Dlhxl 15 &11t d*lr (hrltcomr x{ ht lrld &t&xx fl5-l r,*r 0r0""'r) Flr-l rnnnrry rryd. (tb.-.4 [-Flm-l rrm tsd{,ttn l(.r ,flr$, fE rlirff,iililffl,*,m,ruh) E r"/, lrrrr lredtr 06r. rs)oslq.) @ ffi.1?,fitr fu-do* ri.ilAa.tP&ffioE t#.Ti'-?k,,*,.r lrmrnr D{rolr m e###iTnxfu ffi*:1,1.T::**,(ltllrrllr 0UGII tlolnl') I rir I arr,r r*uur caofi[ctat raxoc) l-0-l r"tura dq]'l{ "Jri',"uolto 1o"r.*1 l-Oil on rm (rrn<. qr h.. pn,r*r #Htffi,S'.irl*f Hliluo mtAD crr6r: f-if-l rr- u*- :- [tcu OdEf, rnlc U,t tat,'rlff, u"9r,r*sr&rlotrr*+o.) **ji:lrff'; tClffiififfti.,.,o l-61 ql, grr*,rn herrqvxl l-Cill ot btfld. {eoa fi*rffi.) Aru{.|r ,lo (flruut 0{PmE @l *g C&b kr {rrr[0rt.i) h c A 0 II Ort. q .10 Vtll llunbpn ord-0t51 9o1.. Iob{e [hyolton (Ft) - Dhrcton otCrouodroltr ttor Inch - 2000 leot I L c L T 0 6 u 0 0 I T!o trl I lt) ,A )* OEOLOOIC MAF AND TYATE R TAEL E C.OI\ITOUR8 LO8 AMIqOg 8ANCH F.U,O.0 E I{iH[?tHN,'.!lI!tl'ffiIifi5.'& #fli ,lIxrJJO LS,rJ.o}tt0{ Olrf, il}i{ h}l ,\:1., I D, 3634969766 PAGE 13./ 14 : E 3o;'; l:,o l-q;7 ILed I -<F l( -:. lo:lcd =, l.t{&6 l-Y lYes li€esi t!- 4 a ===r;l <l-r :EO =<lo .:t mo ci o- o.2' dooo (,o az<q, as "6LF*zg8 <ut(trJ 83d; 2 III<Fsi ?ii: E,/ LI5s aJ- E "tto- '/ u*o' )/v., '/ ,/ A88 a;,ri,/-CLi / \ 'o- ---1. \ '$ --\. \ t-,\I.h /! TK- T (,-JE' 6FE-ru-se re:25 FNUM:MULAUGHLIN WATER ENGRS ID ' 36349OS266 PAGE t4/t4 LIST OF REEERENCES Fefier, c.w., I99d Aeplied Hvdroaeoro€v. prcnric+tlall , w. 4T2474,3d edftion Freeze, R A and Ch€rry, J. A, Grormdvrtr 1929, kEdice-Iia4 $4p_ HenL J. D.,1992"USGS Water- Snpply Papa ?254, pp. 35-36. Sawyer, C. N. aDd Mcca$y, P.L- L967, Chesrisw for Sasitarv -Euiaeers- McGraw-HG[ pp.4204ZL- Ilepworth-Pawlak Gmtechicat Inc-, 1997, 'kelinrinary Geotechicai SurOy, prcp*ed R€sideaial DE ^Cap,meut, Los Amigos Ra,ch p.U.D--, prcpsred for Grq Boccker. US EPA; 1980' Desieo ldaoual GSite Wastamrer Trearrrcar and Disposai Svsterps EpA 625i1€0-0I2, 39Ip. State tr #"er's Of6ce Well ad Decree Records KiIthaE, R NL andWidoaD4 B-L.,LggT,rceobgicMapoftreca6oDdaieauaoraosle, CrarfieldCcnruy, C-olorado-, Coloazdo Geolagical Survey Opea file R€port 97-3. Xi*nam' R M. et al., 1996, "C-reologic il{ap of 6e Carle Creek Aadranglq Craddd Corty, Colorado., C€forado H€ical S,ry.y Opea.File R€?ort 96-I- Kirl&am, R Nf- €t d- 1995, 'Geotrqgic Map of the Gleawood Spnngs quadraugle, Gar6eld Corory, Colorado-, Colorado Gologicai Suwey Opeo FiIe R€port 95-3, Ki*lao' R N{- et al, 1995, *Geologic }4ap 'dfu Shshone aEdrdngle, GarEeld Courry, Colorado., Colorado Creological Sr:rray Op€a Fii,e Reeort 95-4- Wrightu/atEr trngineer+ 1979, a-osAnrigos/CMc - Propced r and Treafneu Site-, Meooradm Rcpon to Joh llopkiEs. F. M- Fox & Assciars, 1974, Roarim Fork and Cr,/stal Vailess. A! Em/irodgregtal and Enr Surdv- Emiirqmemal Geolory No. S, Prqared for &e Colorado Geological Sqrvey, 30 p. The Orenco Systemso Septic Tank Tricking Filter in Colorado Roger J. Shafer, P.E.' Abstract In the past 20 years the onsite wastewater system. industry has seen the introduction of numerous innovative technologies to treat wastewater. Although generally very good.at organic removal and nitrification, thele innovative technologies generally do linle to remove nitrogen. In response to the need for nitrogen removar ,yr,.*, i", puir of ctlorado, several orenco Systemso Septic Tank Trickling Filter"s have been installed, and are currently being evaluated Introduction In a semi_arid state such as colorado, it can be argued that all water is sensitive to nitrogen contamination. However, in some parts of the ,tut., ii is a fact that some watersheds are not only' sensitive, but have been contaminated by excessive amounts of nitrogen as nitrate These areas include Indian Hills and cody Park in Jefferson county; Harris Park in Park countl" and Highland Lakes in Teller county. These are only a few of the areas where nitrate levels in groundwater have been measuredto be above a normal background level of less than 1 mg/l In some instances, nitrate levels have exceeded the drinking water limit of l0 mg/l. rendering the groundwater source non-potable. In addition to effecting groundr"!'ater supplies' surface waters such as reservoirs, can be affected by nitrogen Nitrogen. in addition to phosphorous- contributes to reservoir eutrophication, which degrades water qualitv In the mountainous areas of Colorado's Front Range, where ground'*'ater is often sensitive to nitrogen, three common factors often exist; l; densely populated watersheds' 3) fractured bedrock. and 3) low water quantities- One of the primary iort""t of nitrogen in these areas is from onsite wastewater Systems (OWS) Effluent'from ori,S will generalrv enter the cracks and fissures in the fractured bedrock with total nitrogen concentrations between 20 mg/l to 70 mg/l Depending on the performance of th-e dratn field- rutrogen mai' be in a combination of forms such as ammonia 61i[l or nitrate 6Nor) However, pnor_to entering the groundwater. nitrogen is generally conrerted to the nitrate rorm. rne newer ows with septic tanli effluent dosing systems, suitabre drain field frtter media, and a four-foot separation distance to the fractured bedrock, will reduce total nitrogen lereis in septic tank efiluent to around 30 mg/l before entering the bedrock. The older, nonconforming systems such as cesspools installed prior to the 1970's will generally have a negligible nitrogen reduction of septic tank effluent' once the ows efiluent enters the fractured bedrock, the effiuent can travel considerable distances without much reduction in nitrogen. with low quantities of groundwater in the fracnrred bedroch there is little dilution pJtential, and a little nitrate goes a long way. To compensate, increasing the required separaiion distance between drinking water wells and OWS in fractured bedrock has been r."or*"nded.lTo maintain increased separation distances' 200 feet for instance, larger lot sizes are required Therefore' there is a correlation befween ' Roger J. Strafer, P.E., Branch lvlanagcr, E. O. Church' lnc'; PresidcaL SCG ErUcrpnscs' Inc" Evergrceq Colorado ' Karl L. For( Julia H. Schotl andThomas l. fecfe. Ptr-D"'Mounrain Resi&nual Dcvelopmcnt Mimmum WeU hotecuve Drstanccs, wcll watcr euatiry," Journal of ErnT ronmcntal Hcalth. No'cmbcr/Dcccmber (1980)' ll0-133 I ' Page 2 Orenco SystcmsD S€puc Tank Trickling Filtcr rn Colorado mairtaining a 200-foot separarion distance and the lot sizes for a given area- Lot sizes are related to develophent densities, which also corresponds to the potential concentrations of nitrate entering the groundwater. Typically, a?-aqe minimum is needed for an area to maintain a 200- foot sJparation distance between wells and drain tields. Unfortunately, there iue numerous existing developed areas, and existing platted areas, with lot sizes less than 2 acres. The Fate of Nitrogen proteins and urea contribute over 97o/o of the 20 to 70 mg/l of the total nitrogen (TN) typically found in do*"stic *aste*'ater.2 'In the septic tank, with the absence of oxygen (Oz), microorganisms obtain ener-qv from fermentation and anaerobic oxidation of organic matter' During this fermentation and anaerobic oxidation process, the organic nitrogen is bio-chemically converted to ammonia 0\H.) in accordance with the following equation: Urea [CO[NHr)z] + HzO -+ 2N]14'+ CO:l With l0% to i00,6 of the TN-in wastewater stored in the sludge in the septic tank,4 the remaining nitrogen exits the septic tank in the form of NlLr. ln a well-aerated drain field. in the presence of O:, ammonia is converted to nitrate O{Ol) in accordance with the following equation. \-FLr- * lO: -+ NOl'* 2H- - H:O The more oxygen available. the more complete dosing, field resting, anci shallorv tield depths. all soil, increasing nitrifi cation. the conversion wiil be. Well drained soils, increase the orygen content of the receiving As the effluent continues to travel toward groundwater, denitrification can occur' Bacteria capable of denitrification are commonly found in ,nuny subsurface environments.' These bacteria reiuire anoxic (low oxygen) conditions to reduce NOl. However, denitrification requires nearly equal parts of organic .oiUon (C) and nitrate 6t iOr) as expressed in the following denitrification equation: 4NOr'+ 5CHzO + 4FI- + 2Nz ' 5COz +7HzO "[n lgoundwater settings, a lack of labile organic C is the most common limitation to a""ifin"",ion.,6 Hence, effluent can travel long distances with little or no conversion of nitrate. Typical denitrification processes in lvtunicipal iastewater treatment plants will add methanol as a source oforganic carbon. 2 GcorgeTchobanoglous, F. L. Burtoq and Mcrcalf urd Eddy, Inc. "Wastewater Enqinc€rins: -l-rqilmsnL usDosat' and Reuse.' (New York: Mcgnw-Hill Book Co., Inc.. l99l). ffi w,lh.rrn st"rry L. Schiff. ana lonn e, iu.rry, ;'Biog"o.hemical Evolution of Domestrc waste water tn vv-- t . Sgpt.icsystems: l. Concepiof frfoa"f," Gmund Water. November-December (199'1): 130-133. ' WiIhelE, Schitr, and Cherry, 130-133. t wilhelm, Schi.ff, and Cherry, 130-133. o wilhetm, Sctutr, andChcrry, 130-133. pcde 3 Orcnco Systems! Scptic Tank Trickling Filtcr in Colorado The Orenco Systemso Septic Tank Trickling Filter Ln an effort to maintain the quality of surface waters, several wastewater treatment processes have been developed to decrease the Biochemical Oxygen Demand prior to discharging to waterways With less oxygen demand, the dissolved oxygen levels of surface waters remain at healthy levels tbr stream life. These processes, which include extended aeration, trickling filters, batch reactors, rotating biological contactors, and sand filters, also convert NH4 to NOr, When improved treatment was needed for OWS, these treatment processes, particularly extended aeration and sand filters, were applied to small residential flows. However, little nitrogen reduction is obtained, and groundwater can still be adversely impacted by OWS. In 1993. Orenco Systemst [nc. in Sutherlin, Oregon, constructed a treatment system that combined rwo treatment system technologies (the septic tank and the trickling filte5) together in a scaled-down system that could reduce nitrog.n levels in residential wastewater.' In the Septic Tank Trickling Filter. septic tank eftluent is applied to rnckling filter media for nitrification. The nitritjed effluent returns to the anaerobic environment of the first compartment of the septic tanli tbr denitrification The organic carbon located in the sludge of the septic tank allows the denitrification process to occur. Nitrogen as nitrate is converted into a nitrogen gas, which is vented into the atmosphere already composed of more than 78o,'o nitrogen. In addition to nitrogen reduction, Biochemicai Oxygen Demand (BODs) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) are also reduced to below 20 mgr'l. Current testing is being pertbrmed to determine the system's potential for fecal coliform and phosphorous reductions.t The Coloredo Connection ln response to the pressures of development in fracrured bedrock areas of Jefferson and Clear Creek counties in Colorado, where lot sizes are often less than two acres, the need for OWS that provide denitrification became critical to protect groundwater sources. Under the design of E. O Church. Inc. and rhe installation supervision of SCG Enterprises, lnc the first Orenco Systemso Septic Tank Trickling Filter was installed in February 1997 for a single famiiy home in Clear Creek County As of today's date (April 1998) frfteen systems have been installed and ten placed into operation in Jefferson, Clear Creek, and Douglas counties. Each of the systems have been installed in areas where local lndividual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations are more stringent than the Stue ISDS guidelines. Usually as repairs, the systems are generally installed on small lots, in fractured bedrock, where wells may be at risk of contamination. System Performance Little funding has been obtained for ongoing monitoring of these systems. Due to sampling and lab fees, testing has been limited. Howe,rer, SCG Enterprises, fnc., the Orenco Systemso dealer ' H,arold L. Ball, P E.. Proceedines of thc Seventh Intcrnational Svmoosium on Individual and Small ConunuluN Scwaee Svstems. Dccember I l-13. 1994: Mtroeen Redtction in an Onsite Tnckline FilterAjonow Filtcr Svstcm A.SAE 1994.t George Heufelder and Susan Raslg A Comrrcndium of lnformation on Alternative Onsite Seotic Svstem Tcchnolow in Massachusctts @arnstable: Barnstable County Department of Health and Environmcnt, 1997) 36-37. Page 4 Orcnco Systcmso Scptic Tank Trickling Filt$ in Colorado for Colorado, has collected samples from the systems to verify performance. Also,. as conditions of the ISDS permit, the systims installed in Jefferson County have a quarterly sampling requirement and a discharge limit of 20-ml total nitrogen. The original system installed in Colorado in February 1997 has the most samples collected and tested with nearly one sample per month. For the last ten months of operation, the average total nitrogen (TN) concentration in this treatment rystem eftluent has averaged 8.1 mgll. The effIuent is thln discharge to a sand filter located in the fractured bedrock for further treatment and nitrogen reductiins. Although it is diflicult to obtain a direct correlation, nitrate levels in the well seruilg this site have decreaied since the septic tank trickling filter system was installed. The other systems installed in Colorado are continuing to be monitored. Primary concerns include high altitude and cold climate effects on the systems. Also, flow rates from the residences, tank sizes, and media types vary. To date, approximately 100 Orenco Systems@ Septic Tank Trickling Filters have been installed at various locations tkoughout the United States. Few sites have formal monitoring programs. However, the data avaiiable indicates a generally consistent total nitrogen reduction in residential \r'astewater on the order of 70o/o to 85o/o. Conclusions The adverse impacts on drinking u,ater systems, bv nitrogen from Onsite Wastewater Systems, has been well documented ouei the last 20 years Even sites with soils that have traditionally been considered suitable for r.r,astew'ater treatment mav have little capability to reduce nitrogen. .A watershed can be considered sensitive to nitrate contamination for any combination of the follorving reasons l ) soil rvith poor nitrogen removal capabiiities such as fractured bedrock or ioose allivial gravels. 2) shallou' groundwater; 3) small lot sizes densely populated with O\l'S. andlor 4) lou-volume aquifers or low-flow streams. The Orenco Svstemsc Septic Tank Trickling Filter, in its present form or some variation. can prove to be a viable. long-lasting, low-maintenance, onsite wastewater treatment system for reducing nitrogen, organics. pathogens, and phosphorous. RuisedApril 18, 1gg8 P.O. Box 4178, (303) 670-?194 Evergrccn, Colorado 80437-4178 tax (.103) 674-0ttt3 ORENCO SYSTEMSO SPPITC TAI\IK TRICKLING FTLTER TOTAL NITROGEN (NOr + TI(N) SUIVIMARY St Germain Residence, Jefferson County Placcd into opcration in August 1997 TN (mdl) YR J F'M A M J J A S o N D AVG ,97 22'25' 9.1 '9E 2.3 20 4.9 Bock Residence, Clear Creek Counfy Placed into opcratron February 1997 TN (me/l) YR J F M A M J J A s o N D AVG '97 3g'47'JJ 8 6 6 t3 <l 8.1.gg l7 6 7.6 Nanniga Residence, Douglas County Placed into operation August 1997 TN (mdl) YR J F M A M J J A S o N D AVG '97 24'3 t2 '9E t6 l3 l6 Notc: ' *Start-up" rcsults not iucludcd in avcrage Wqstcrl)cttcr Product Distribution - Onsite Managenrcnt Sarvices - Orrsitc Syslcrrr Evaluations Bock Residence-Feb '97 - 3 People Clear Creek County Morello Residence- luly '97'3 People Jefferson Courtty Simpson Residence- July '97- 2 People Jefferson County Nanniga Residence- Aug'97- I Persott Douglas County St. Gernrain Residence- Aug '97- I Pcrsott Jefferson County Halliburton Residence - Oct '97 - 3 People Clear Creek County Spadafora Residence - Clear Creek Cotrrrty Sntith Residence - Douglas Coturty Anderson Residence - Clear Creek County SITE YR l6 2i Nteyers Residence - Jefferson Cotrnty Cox Residence - Jeffersott Cottnty Russell Residertce'- Clear Creek Corutty Kendall Residence - Borrlder Cotrtrty Pine Coffee Slrop-- Jeffersort Cottttty Prusse Residertce - Jcffcrsott Couttty tltoN'l'lr r.Y AvEIIACE Notes: ' "Start-r'p" rcsttlts not irrclrrdcd itr avclagcs t BOD, - lo nrpl and TSS ' 5 rrrg/l 'Only torlets cotttrected to systctrtt lrled,a Asserubly Partially Exposcd -Not lrrsrrlatccl untrl l.ttrtrirty lt)()B ' Hontc vacated in Novenrber Not ttsetl ilr avcragcs '97 SCG Enterprises, Inc. ORENCO SYSTEIIIS" SEP'I'IC 1'ANK'I'IIICKI,IN(; IItt,'I'}]II -'I'()1'AI. NI'I'IT0GEN (NOJ't ]'KN) SUNIIITARY rit 58r - 1-6- etr Io {{)20 HI ;;l -.)J J. 8 s- -*-- --41r- e.i I 3gr- o N D AVG 3 <l 8.1 <l 42 57- ,{:3 l2.o 1i,tt 9.1 bJ,., All s1'stcrrrs atc locatcd trt Colorado at elevatiorrs Lclrver:rr 7(l(,(l aud t)(XXl fect Nt,l rrsetl rr avdragcs 1 l'98 '97 '98 '97 '98 '97 '98 '97 :qt- '97 '98 9 '98 '98 '98 '98 iqg '9tt . c)g .c)g ;gr8 I -32 -1'- li I .ri l].0 Se cTankTrickli Filter Nifrogen Reduction The Biological Process ---, *G OturcoW lrrcorpaaecl firurry1y1l'*t E fiH.s..onEot{ c,fB.5lZ The 0Sl Segtic TankTrickJing Flter is an innova- tive, patented mefiod for reducing niuogen in septic tank effluern BOD and s$erwaste sfrengfi parameters are reduced as well. tt is a simple, inexpensive addition to new or existing vrrate rti g trt se ptic ta nks. A Unique New Method 0Sl has combined tnrc wellkno,vn technole gies+ickling fihers and septic tanksin a new way. Here's howitumrks: A small basin hous- ing tickling fitter media is installed on bp orto tre side of a segtic tank near fie inlet A pump located in a Biotrbeo Pump Vautt atthe oudet end of the ank pumps fihered effluemto a noz- de in the top of tre rickJing fiher basin. The nozie disuibutes effluent overtre surface of the media. The effiuemthen trickles down trrough and around 6e media and back into tre septic tank, where ittravels fie lengfi of the tank and backto fie pump, completing one cycle. Wastewater is circulated several6mes through tre rickling fiker media and septic tank before being discharged by a programmable timer controlled pump. Bectical Typ i cal Effi uent lmprovemem B0t)s TSS Tlt llofiEtScrcened ffiuelttrq t 16 xl a The pocess of remwing nirogen from septic tank e{fluent invotves corwerting nitrogen from a liquid b a gaseous fonn ln iB gaseous form, nitrogen is liberated harmlessty into fie atnos' phere which is already composed of more fian 78% nirogen. This corwersion involves ttam stage+ one aembic (witr orygen) and one anoxic (low orygenl. The aerobic process occurs in tre uickling fiherwhere nitrogen from tre septic unk-grimarity in ilre form of ammonia -is corwerEd to nirate. This first step is called niffication. Once dre nttrogen is in a nitrate form, it can be converted b niuogen gas by fie bacteria lMng in the anoxic conditjons of the septic tank This last step is called denffica- tion. The septic ank is an ideal environmentfor these denffing bacteria, and tre organic solids in tre tank provide tre nutrients needed b convertfie nitrate m nitrogen gas. Preteafrnent Unit Too! The Trickling Ftter also has applications as a prefeament unit for new onsite systems or renorating problem sand fihers, mounds, or drainfields. Typically, when waste sfenqfi reduction is tre primary obiective, tre Trickling Ftter b operated on only tte second compart- ment of fre septic tank or a separate pump tanlc See henreatmem Tricklin g Fher fiyer for more information- WihSegticTanlt Tririding HlEsIrBrL 15-a l0-z) 10-20 IBBO{E Farle{4.9 trasulE (5.u {g}28E1 Rrmps operaE on 110/ pm,er. (/)'b o\ o G (D 3e\- =r=N)(D. sI (D- f, C)oo- (Jit.r<P"o-r Q9 tocrciJ N(Oo- -Do)(rF o cr N)QZe s,f.) _tg <J10a t crr ^"o Lr=I _(D3 'coa i(ou -53c 3qo t6 !2orn<rn =I -(r-*3HtH* =EI-\==_+ -rS-fn{er_{= -lrE5 =rn =a -o\ rn€ I =trEEds=srar3-r=s5=onilcrE-g tL-: =rn =a qB qB SB ss i$ gB B* gS l= P* € * tB 3 (4 tq=S SSsbs I I I(\ =o\o (D >rr(,(D(a<(D(t I9c)\>o o f,oo E FilB 8n'e Sie PsIfrcE€ ^r-r.fr.,fr,ctr C') (^)oof,5 ci S. o"Q5.ql I Ia6c) o ro (D n*R r,ror LTFL,Z Tarctttxe FumSrsrrr ;TflII it.'".'" =c(!a I Ral. 0sl r'$n-r396 8 t7-ilAl7 I 0sl r:11!+1995 Gillilian Engr. r 995-l 997 Anchongc Tank r997 Jcnscn r 935- 1996 2!-0ct.96 r(v95-12/95 16-Mer-97 1/!7-1u97 Jcnscn ryg$ln, Cbico. CA t!Ir+l!n5 lttlllrgge Chico. CA r!r'!yLllt'!r5 rlIBr!l!lt Mal.osa rrsdrnca Malrosc 0fficc Anchorag!. A( 25O Chugrrl scnool Anchoragr. AK 200 aorGalis Scptic Tr Trietlc Fihcr Pcrformanca Locrtion Flow Occ- Tenk B:n mF Srrnplo 8005 TSli TXiln tltt3n N03n Ttl 00 pH TP Numbcr Sirr Tygr on:oll mc'l mryl mql mq/l ll5 2 lm S 2O.() L5 STrll 2l' tlittJf. 0gon-cillorm lf cub.tl rSzlmsc2J fi6t na gen& 2t' di.: 3F Accu-Ptc U'tfr tls2lmscz5 S.cond t.st p.nod: 2l'ditt t Accu'qtc CF'IXD 6!* ts* ntr n655rr0 1.7 2.. I ndrrmn ErA 6at Elt $r ST rll SI/FTF ci lzi 7, 66 5a l0 l(.ducmn $l t5!t 31L ST rJl 214 r0?.3 n.7 25.8 I I I (rducEon SStt ]3f i6Yr 369l t25 It u t, ,.5 11 1 56 5{ n 5.6 I 2 5E 0.t I Irduqmo SI rll *r.ducqn E2:t ST rll 125 ST rlt 219 GlA 90!g 86 3t 78* 6E O.E ?0 7l* 5t lr8 EIA 103.{ -'q 39r a 86t r25 a ,.5 7.50.E 7Er 6Eu5 3lr lms5d9 lorolo mtdit gltc.d in l.l.r 20! l5(I, 2c.cl 3tditt 3F 17co'celllozm (f cubcsl 250t 60(l rF s r30 a8 :30 zr 3.4 , :76t ll { lSUt 2c 5:O 5 ST rtl 32E 55 39 39 }oen-cctl lozm tf cub.st STEII ctl 18 2.3 r I l9 I :: -c t rrO*ton gS* 96f 957' ;3% I Acno Rusty Stevrr Rano Rusry Stevrr Rsno Rusty St.vcr Lr: Vtgrs rrsidrnct 102 sit I l nn dwanoa 12 nr. r Ism 2c :0r0 7: Stditt 21' 1pcn.cctlloam {Tcubcsl 3tdietJt 1pan.cclllo.m Ecubosl ST rll tr rlductoo 92:t 62* I ,.ducrn tZA tlf ST rfi t9 lrrdraim A* STrlt l! 6!' t rrdrcul ,6* Slrll 1A 235 ,, ,fi ll0 SI rfl i.?ducton ,94 62i 31 52 l5 :6 I 190 lr ?ll 16 13 75 ST rtl ltdi..r3f. frrrl. ST/RTFd| l9o 1A 3 I rrducoon 8lA 764 75:g ;8Y. SI otl lO2 21 592 2m zc-r, ZO20 5t 3tdict 3t 0poa.colllotm ltcubosl rzD zl.tl !t ll'dit.t t Accu-l.c CF- tA 2t€ 5t 97n su 37 d.z l.r l.r t 1 :rat 97i 52J 3, l.l ti0.55l il ,ar 0: 6.8ttt.Adlo.m lCdittSt Ogon ctUlotm (tcubtt'ltdotpl rll ll l5.l { dwrt*n 6 ilp.l.rdmin A.f 7r* !71 59* . HlTE fN wtt stil dmeCiry wita nning wu sOglod fit fntl fN eu t.l ng/L lt t fN r.duca 0 ol 6 guctnL r.$d.ncr 170 , llCl zto st ST rfi Da ,r 62 0.2 7r.2 s,ta I 5 En dwation t2 tm.Zl'ditt 8 Accu.gtc CF-l fr r33 !t{O tt tta Alr,tto.m zfdi..I3,. Ogtn'ctllotm lTcttbtt'l? deoel ora dunoon 6 fia.trdrb6 13*,.1 7t1t . IVofE I7v rrr soll dtogtbg rt.n rniag wtt qgod. fho frrtl fN r,,t t, lt t fN rtdnctbt d 0T gorcont 50% 52 ll r9% 53 r2 7!r 3:t 05 s6r mt i2a ?l 62 0: 112 Prfc I I I I a I 53 7l 7: n* Tank/Rccircul"ting Tti.kl" Fih". Pc.,ofi' SI tft Srgtic ont rllturnt qurlity brlar rcdvrrinl ricllr Olrr ui ST/RTF rft Srpdc unl rlltrrm qurlity wi6 uicklr llhrr uait h o0l'tin Upltow: Eflfu.rn qurliq folov;ing uicUhg liltrr rod upllow llhrr Confgrntbn: S-Srreh corprrtmrnr utt 2G-Two Go.t?a,tmatn tllU 2c.rl.l*ocomerrtnlmu*wltrrltlurm6ltrrEkltrbrlllrrbl*rrngtuluxlrtccrd.TYco.tpffh.m RR 8rcltrlrtioartlic- C'Gdtriruor,'tuE rlr-'m'folf tlnrhdrr't TP TricUr firr urr RE SrcircFrp l$.mbly. Fngruntltt grlr Bd. tocrlion flow Occ. Tank Rf,fff Srnplar 8005 TSS TIOIn llH3n tl03n TN 00 plt TP Spd ilutnb.t t!.---TE. on:g!mtdit nqrl mqrtt mg/l mCl mq/l mdl ndl rW'l Glecicrhccest I x.[tP.u'MT lSoo ST ri ftmtr SI/BII rtl UilrGi ST rll Lrolr SI/trIF rll Uflbi ST ofi ftrtlr SI/fiIF rlt ST rll form SI/8"IT rll UPfror ST rll fsoTo ST/RTF rll UPllow ST rll Iemh ST/IIF rll U9,lotx ST cll Form ST/RII rll U9f,ow ST rll Forn S[/RfFrfi UPllow ST rll fr:m STETF cll U9flow ST rtl Foem SIETF cll UP0il, lt5.l!r:t7 llllldsonnsidnco 17.6 lr.t 0.0 tl,z 6.0 l.r 17 205 1.3 l.l 5.1 Glecicr Prccast I Krbo.ll" Mr ls(D rSf.l|t3, l{ilvo.:,ontuidtnco ,t, scG tl' Colo,tdo radanca lgD Moherc County [ tuironr on. t.stroom 15tD zc 1.5 {.0In5? | taudto Conmrrcnl IMotrn CounrY I Aruon.l5O 2c r.2 r 1.2 L9 ,.9 6.9 l0.l L2 52 191t7 | 902 Sastmo 5.0 l.l r.6 rttdenct Mohavc CountY | tuuon.l5m 2c..1 rng, lsSfi Cnaouzt 1.2 {.0 5.2 9.0 rcardtnct Moheva CountY I Anron.t5fil 2c'cl 2.9 l0 15: 5.0 l.{ 10.{ 1.5 0.2 6.9 L{ 0.2 5.1 5.t 8.9 tt.g {.6 0.2 t.2 l$f, I zlsoctocta* rrsrdlncl Mohrvc CountY | tuttonr t5@ 2c'cl l5(l 2c'cl l5o) 2c'cl {UD 2c 2 l5d, 2c.., 150 Zc'rt 5.7 t.9rrm l52lt o.stfiS.nds r!3rd!ncl Mohavo CountY | tuiron.r0 t.0 0.5 1.0 tgln | 5685 G.r.tt. rctrdancr Mohavc CountY I Anronr tZ tZ5 5.8 5.t1997 | Jf,s,u]f,ryts rrtrd!nc! Mohtvc CountY I Aruont ST rll ftrtlr SI/RfF rfl 5'5 Ueltor Lg ST rlt Forn SI/RIFrll 3 Ugltor 10 ST rfl LrrJr S[/frIfrll ! tjglbr 0J 1.2 1.8 6.5 122 1.0 5.9r!}97 | Z$ nicct f,d Lgthrrrn Church iloiarc CountY I Ariront 0., 7.E lo.E 0.5 LZ {.2l:lt? lfll fiom Lant rr:idrocr Uohrvr CountY I Arudrt l5 !.r l6 1.5ttl, I wTwntn rtgdrncr Frfp 2 0: 1" IttcLNE VILLAGE GrrurnnL It'lpnovrvrNr Dtsrntcr INCLINI] V I LLAGE GENERAL I M PROV EMENT DISTII' ICT S PECIIICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE PUMP STATIONS GENERAL: Individual sewage pump stations shall not be uscd in the District unless, wherc thc property is too low to be scrved by gravity to an existing sewer line, the prope(y owner shall install an individual pump station as approved by the District' The owner may install the prcssure building sewer with his own contractor or employees' However' the District will approve materials and inspect and approve the construction' AII pump stations will discharge into a manhole unless otherwise specified by the District' Where individual sewage pump stations are authorized, they shall be designed, constructed' and maintained in conformance with these specifications. Plans for individual sewage pump stations shall be submitted to the Districi for approval at time of application for service if they ditfer from these specifications. District inspection of newly installed..pumping facilities shall be compieted in accordance with the procedures outlined in "IVGID requirements to construct water and sewer service lines'" The District may periodically inspect any individual sewage pump station to determine if it is being properly maintained. Where stations are not being mainta-ined in conformance with these specifrcations, service may be terminated. Resuription of service will not be allowed until all discrepancies are corrected and the work has been approved by the District. Any expense taused the District to discontinue and resume service shall be paid by the property owner at the time of reconnection. PUMPS: A minimum o[ two purnps (dual cornpressor pneumatic ejector shall bc approvcd by thc District pri6r to irrsrall:rtion) slrall bc providcd at cach intlividual scwagc Pulllp strtliorl (l007ostand['ry caltaciry;. whcrc purr.rps arc uscd, thcy shall bc eithergrindcr purnps or non-clog scwilqL: I)tttltps, cttgittccrcd to scrvc tlrc dwcllilrg and ovcrcoll)c thc llclrd prcssurc within tltc pt'cssurc cjcctor lilrc- L]TILITIES 'I .) 10 Sr,r,<r'lwall'r Rrr.rtl DEI'ARTr\4ENT . lrrr lirrc Vrll.rIr', Ncv.t<l.t tJ't'1 I i ' t7O)l1l\)l.)oi . t.AX (20?) llJ2-1,1(r() Puntps (con'l ) Pagt'2. Crintic-r Punrps shall be spccially dcsigncd for grinding and pumping raw scwagc. Punips sh:rll conforn] Lo the following requirements: The motor shall be 2HP mininlum' corrrrsirrrr rcsis(alrl stainless steel hardw are, I l/4" minimum discharge , stainless stcel cut(cr b:rr. slainlcss stcel wear platc with rnicrometer adjustment, s(ainlcss stecl motor shalt rurd au(onratic direction reversc with each operation cycle.. Dischargc piping within the station shall be 2 inches diameter (minimum). Non-Clog Sewage Pumps shall be subnrcrsible and especially designed ftrr pumping raw scwag.. Pu*p, discharge piping shall have the capability of passing a 2" solid. Thc motor speed shall not excecd 1750 RPM. The pump body water housing shall bc o[ cast irtn construction. Hardware shall be of non-corrosive materials-.The pump heatl shall bc as required for the particular installation and the pump shall be sized to provide a rninimum of 20 gpm outpu( at the design head. VALVES: Each pump shall be equipped with a check valve and an isolating gate valve' Valves and check shall be located outside the sewage pump station wet well. CONTROLS AND ALARM: Pumps shall be auromatically controlled by the level in the wet well. The stand by pump shall be controlled in such a manner that it will automatically take the place of the first pump in the event of failure. An alternator system shall be installed to balance wear on both pumps. A read high water level light shall be provided in a moisture-proof enclosure adjacent to the station in clear view of the residence served. This light shall be controlled by a separate level setting above the lead pump control range. Audible alarm shall be installed. wET WELLS and STORAGE CHAMBERS: A minimum of 300 gals. of storage per living unit shall be provided above the normal pump opcration levJs. Such storage shall be provided either in the wet well or in an adjacent structure with a drain back feature. Storage is provided primarilyto allow continued use <Juring brief outages. Wet wells and storage chambers shall be either concretc, cast iron, coal tar lined and coated steel, or fiberglass. A manhole opening shall be providcd into wet wells and storage chambers. The wet well shall be equipped with the required inlcts and outlets. I)agc 3 l)unrps (con't) PRESSURE LINES: Pressure tines shall be sized to provide a minimum velocity o[ 2 fcct pcr second. Buried prcssurc line piping shall bc SDR2l, Ring Tite pressure pipc. unlcss prcviously accepted in u,riting by IVGID, prcssuriz-cd pipc from individual sewcr punrp st;llions shall bc Ring-Tite Class 200 (SDR2l ) ol- engineered size acceptable to tlrc District and not less than 2 inches diameter. Soh,ent u,clcied joints orangles shall not bc uscd- Abovepiping nlust meet ASTM Standard D22,41. Discharge piping in and adjlccltt Lo pump station shall be SCH.80 PVC or galvaltized or equivalent, and shall bc acccssible at all times' I)rcssurized sewer pipe shall be hydrostatically tested and mcc't \\relcr pi1rc tcst specifications. Installation standard shall be manufacturer's spccilrc:rtitlns and shall meet al I IVGID installation requiremcnts. Property Line Sewer Clean Out ,' t Red Alarm Light lnterior Audible Alarm Access Ports Redwood Box 4 Gravity to Sewer Main Storage capacity Alarm float Lag pump on Lead pump on Pumps off Gate Valve s * t. Engineers, lnc. @ Wright Water B lB Colorado Ave. P.O. Box 219 Glenwood Springs, Colorado B I 602 (9701 945-7755 rEL 1970) 945-9210 FM (303) 893-1608 DENVER DTRECT L|NE Aprll27, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Regulatory Office & Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3303 RE: Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan - Review of Additional ISDS Analyses Dear Mark: On April 13, 1998, Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (WWE) submitted our recommendations to Garfield County regarding ISDS issues for the Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan. Since then, the County has received additional information from consultants for the adjacent property owners. This letter presents our review of the additional comments and analyses regarding the ISDS issues. In addition, as technical advisors to the Board, we have provided a summary of our opinions on this matter. New information reviewed since our April 13, 1998 letter includes: o Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. Potential Impacts on Groundwater Flow and Quality Due to use of Individual .septic Systems for Domestic Wastewater Treatment and Disposal, prepared by Mclaughlin Water Engineers, Inc., dated April 1998. o Testimony by John M. Kaufman, P.G., C.P.G., of Mclaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd., and John Currier, P.E., of Resource Engineering, Inc. at the April 13, 1998 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing. o Memorandum from Garfield County engineer Robert Szrot dated April 17, 1998. o Addendum to the above-referenced Mclaughlin Water Engineers report received via fax on April 24, 1998. r ktter from Gamba and Associates to Colorado Mountain College dated April 21, 1998 and received with cover letter from Beattie & Chadwick to the Board dated Aprrl27, 1998. o [.etter report from Resource Engineering to Greg Boecker dated April 23,1998. DENVER lr03) 480-l 700 DURANGO 19701 2:'9 14i )BOULDER' (3011 4 7-3-9500 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office April27, t998 Page 2 o [rtter from Bishop-Brogden Associates to Greg Boecker dated April 23, L998. o Irtter from Bruce Collins to Greg Boecker dated April 27, 1998. In addition, it is anticipated that further written comments will be provided by the applicant. However, we do not believe any of these rebuttal comments or additional analyses will change WWE's comments presented below. SUMMARY Based on review of analyses by Resource Engineering, Mclaughlin Water Engineers, Gamba & Associates, Bishop-Brogden Associates, and Bruce Collins, we offer the following comments. o Based on available data and current regulations, properly designed and installed ISDS systems (conventional, mounded, or other engineered system) appear feasible for the project. Impacts to groundwater quality will result from the use of ISDS systems and can be generally quantified in terms of change in the concentration of nitrate in the groundwater. Based on the engineering analyses by Resource Engineering and Mclaughlin Water Engineers, and other available data, we believe the cumulative concenlration of constituents in the local groundwater will be less than State and EPA drinking water standards. Recommendations on Design Standards and Management Plan in WWE's April 13, 1998 letter should be followed. In addition, we recommend that the applicant develop the detailed design criteria for each type of possible ISDS system to minimize water quality impacts. In further response to Commissioner Martin's question on "Engineering Technical Preference of ISDS vs. central Sewer," we believe that, from a water quality perspective, central sewer is preferable. This is primarily due to the state's ability to control and regulate a point source discharge to meet both existing and future standards. Site specific conditions which relate to technical feasibility and economics of connecting to the nearest central system must also be considered in evaluating the method of sewage disposal. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Apr1l27, 1998 Page 3 Please call Section 32-1-1006 of the Colorado Revised Statutes 1996 Cumulative Supplement states that proposed development within a sanitation district's boundary and within 400 feet of an existing central sewer main can be required to connect to the central system. It is our understanding that the proposed project is outside the current Spring Valley Sanitation District boundary, but within the district service area. We recommend that the applicant document, for the record, the technical feasibility and economic constraints to central sewer including the option presented by the County Engineer in his April 17, 7998 memorandum. This may be useful to the Board in their decision process. if you have any questions or need additional information. Very truly yours, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. MJE/dIf 92r-047.O40 Michael J. Erion, Water Resources t Water Engineers, tnc. 3l B Coiorado Ave. FO Box219 Glenwood Spnngs. Colorado B 1602 1970) 915- t-755 TEL 19701 915-9210 FAX 1303) B9l-t608 DENVER DIRECT LINE May 19, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Regulatory Office & Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3303 RE: Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan - Additional Review of ISDS Issues Dear Mark: This letter presents additional review comments on information submitted after April 27, t998 by the applicant and adjacent property owners regarding ISDS issues for the proposed Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan. The additional information includes: o Revised well location and data map for Attachment A of Resource Engineering's April 23, 1998 letter report which was missing in Wright Water Engineers' (WWE's) copy of the report. o Report titled "Los Amigos Ranch PUD Filings 6 Through l0Individual Wastewater Treatment Systems Supplemental Documentation" dated May 13, 1998 prepared by Resource Engineering. Attachments include Design Standards and Management Plan for Individual Sewage Treatment Systems and Orenco Systems manufacturer data on trickling filters for ISDS. o May 13, 1998 letter to Sherry Caloia from Mclaughlin Water Engineers (MWE) regarding Los Amigos Ranch and Septic Effluent Studies in Summit County. o May 13, 1998 letter to Sherry Caloia from MWE regarding well information discrepancies in ISDS analyses. Our review comments and opinions in our April 13, 1998 and April 27, 1998 letters remain unchanged. Our comments on the above material is presented below. DENVER (3031 480-i 700 DUMNGO (970) 259-7411 BOULDER - (103) 473-9500 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office May 19, 1998 Page 2 ANALYSIS/COMMENTS Based on review of the above information. we offer the following comments. We agree with MWE that the official State Engineer's Office well data should be used. However, we do not believe this would have a significant effect on the analyses. The Bill's Ranch development (Summit County) ISDS issues are not directly comparable to Los Amigos Ranch. The systems were improperly designed, sized, and constructed. With respect to the contents of the Design Standards and Management Plan prepared by the applicant, we offer the following comments. + We recommend that all ISDS systems be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and shall meet applicable County Regulations and the "state of the practice" at the time of construction. -> The 213 time'use, 1/3 rested bed concept is good and will increase the effectiveness of the system. However, we are concerned about operational responsibility (i.e., operation of valves, etc.). We recommend that more detail on operational procedures be included. In addition, we recommend that the absorption field be oversized by ll3 to meet hydraulic loading requirements. + "Qualified personnel" to perform inspections should be defined in more detail. This person should have professional working knowledge of ISDS systems and be certified by the State for ISDS systems when such certification becomes available. A brief annual summary report of inspections. repairs, and replacement should be compiled and submitted to the County. An opinion of system effectiveness should be submitted each year. The systems shall conform to the adopted specifications in every case, not wherever practically feasible. However, this does not preclude more stringent standards if applicable or appropriate. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office May 19, 1998 Page 3 Please call MJE/dIf 92r-047.040 With respect to the issue of ISDS vs. central sewer, we re-iterate our recommendation from our April 27, lggS letter that the applicant document for the record the technical and economic feasibility of a central sewer system including the option presented by the County Engineer in his April 17 , lggg memorandum. if you have any questions or need additional information. Very truly yours, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. Michael .8. T * .t Greg Boecker 2929 County Hoad 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 303-945-6399 February 14, 1992 Dear Keith: pursuant to your request, I am hereby documenting the relevant information I am aware of regarding Lot 1, Resubdivision of Los Amigos Ranch (hereinafter "the property") 1. Servicing tne property with sewer service will require expansion of the Spring Valley Sanitation District sewer facilities at a cost of approximately giZO,OOO.The tap/system development fee to be charged the pads will be approximately $sSOb r 1Ot" per EQR or approximately $162,250 (29.5 EQR's x $5500 = $162,250). 2. Supplying water to the property will require expansion of the Red Canyo_n_ Water Compihy taiitities and insiallation of a 300,000 gallon water tank to meet ISO fire flow requirehents of 20OO to 2500 gpm for apartments. This will cost the developer of the property between $163,000 and $340,000 depending on Los Amigos Ranch's willingness to participate in up front costs. 3. Down zoning the property could be opposed by Los Amigos Fianch and Auburn Flidge Apartments. Los Amigos Ranch definitely would oppose it, particularly if the previously designated building locations were to be changed. 4. lf the property is down zoned prior to October 31, 1998, Los Amigos Ranch will accelerate tire outstanding $1,000,000 Note to the Dowdys and their assignees, and demand full payment of the outstanding balance pursuant to the terms of the note and the Dowdy/Los Amigos Ranch Contract to Exchange Real Estate dated October 18, 1988. (See Exhibit 'C" to said contract attached hereto). S. lf the property is down zoned prior to sewer expansion, there will be no EQRs avaitable to service the property. Any attempt to put septic tanks on the property, which lies.over the Spring Valley Reservoii would be opposed by both Los Amigos Ranch and Colorado Mountain College. ,. t t- ln summary it appears the property cannot be down zoned until the outstanding $1,OOO,OO0 note is paid in full, and even then there are attendant problems with sewer servics and Los Amigos Flanch PUD land usage, Construction of multi-family housing on the property will require expansion of the existing water and sewer facilities. lf you have.any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (303-945- 63ee). Sincerely, A B.rAu,'\\ Boecker it 7,JLt. cre[,$. -FfAY:T3:5tEl lE = llJ tslt(Jlrl:I'IULAL,urrLlN wArEK ENGHs, : - -- II -- I Lr: J(,J.tErg:, aoo May 13, l99t Ms. Shcrry Caloia C:Ioia & HqpL P.C. 1204 Grad Ave,urc Gleorpood Slxings, Colorado Et6O1 RE: I.os AnigooRsodl P.U.D., Gulitdd Cormty' Colortdo- Septic Efllt€ot fn Sunmtt CoutY Facsimile (93t4*Y766 mwe@mwcwater.com ION/!!D C. ra.L^UqHLhi Ml'( ESEL HALTTDEBIgtSO\WUI^HN.XB|DAII,Nd,tILIOREN TEiNhTEP.XL{YONECH TDE lkLLlcxl-sgroN^Dlrad .cHL!\ GE!qAEUIREII, IIICI{AELE}"GICIR' ,crrN* r't. ?FtrUM XICTIAELBG^LIIA SCOTTS.I,E}TMAN !*lAN S. KOI.5T^D CDEAI DEROS&ER EDI^'r!.RD D. E\L\ lxlaaEo.rE\r'A,l-En OA\7E.F.8L^H^ RO0E8TI' Al(DEnSor.. IIA:\'D6EL LIE}<f D+I\rtrL l,L ftTRAl\lAlJ RONAll) D,LUCEIO AI4N V.rOH!'!5ON Dear Ms. Calcia: Scptic efflgcc has bcco sdied recemly by Messa William Isris of ft Uuiversiry dCotorado and 6e s\rmmit couEry water @ality cmiuce- ErIy wort has focuscd oa phosphonos couamiratim and ctemup by comrcrsion of iodivi&al scfb sl,stros to a 63I scvr€r sJlseo b 6e Sort Barton Gulcb afe,,'- He is now rroaertating a snrdy of aitrate comaminams usitrg Nl'isfiopc as a triDcr. IIe bas ebo publishd a book comniqg Eitrarc cogEmirultioo of sneens rotDd kb Ditlou due in Part to s9P(ic s}IteIns. According ro professor lJryis (personal co@unicatioo oo May 12, 1996), 6c follo*'iD8 eqirical equation was dcveloped fron nass.batare analyscs h $rrnmit Cory ttt cstiDlrc nitratc loditrg iB $rfaae $re@s fron indivifual scpth systeEs: Yn = {4'Yr-sms ufiere Yn is Bitrogco yidd in gras/pmo/ycar. and Yw is uracr yi.Id (ruDotr) iu um/ycar- Accordilg to Mr. 31fich Grco of Frisoo, &e IEI sadttion diltrict is also;.*t tb Bill's RaDc[ dcvelopmcm arca ft,om scpic E]ffi to fu ccmal ssuver systto. This wqt b ogohg- Mcl^aughtin Water Engineers, Ltd- 2,4120 Akottstseeo Denver, Colonado 8m11 GB) 458-5550 watElrrr txrh.r^r@Drrrtrurrn tJlt rt^ctDElr{^6f mE^7pN ]rrDrGfoioot $Oll'Dl^alr6t^'\Orl.@ocoirils- w^5tryATErcollrrFor\.Tran(lNt^NDrqJ9t tartoilclEN WAlIllADlxlt,\IDJ 'lcr^LrYlrYr^t'LE r^TItnD[t^'tDuTE'!7Ir3EC6Or.lCS - --r EI -- May 13, 1998 Ms- Shcrry Catoia Celoia & Houp,t, P-C. f2O4 Grmd Avanc Glcowood $Ebgs" CrlG& tI6Ol RE: Lc Amtros RD.L P.UJ), Cartleld CorntSr' Colmdo -W€Il hformrtba Empfoyed by Reouce Erybstag Im. Facsimile (38)48e9756 mwe@mwcwaEr.com ncFuIDc. la<trlJcro..o{ IIO M. EISEL}I IJOIDZ EIICTSONlrttrl!\M R.XEIr,DAL IALPH L IOIB' lEtrRE\lCt P. xE\rQxEAI^TDE Xd.ALt6r.IJN rOt{AL9r. Mct.AlJCtlUN 6ENI^ BJT,ELI.!G!{^EEtctct ,oHli 5d- E ^u!rrnclr^.E- r- C,^LUi:.Z s@,TTEIJHq,A!(Etl^li s xol.sr^f(;. DE^\J DETO6IEX EDW^.RD A 8.\T\ IRT IS E C}EA' I.ER DANIEF.EAXA rcGIRT',^NDTTSON ' I.E^N'Df,R L LT.\Jfi D^"\:IU- M.l'm^M^L^ BOI{ALD D. ULJ<StrOAt J\lv.rollNsos Dcar }ls- Celoia: Rcsoruce Enginccriag IDc. (R.ED rrmily provlled copi'cs of,wcll inforaatio ttc,'y used to deve}oP thir undcrsnuting of the grumd-uruer couditioos be'rea* thc Lc Asiep3 Rarh P.U.D. tlpm redariug this inforoaim. I discovered incmsisrcoccs x/ith 6cial recqds o 6le z tb $ac Engier's Office (SEO) in Dcavcr which carfd erylain qr ormul difEreaoe of imerprcation- Thc wclb in gcsion are Pcrmits No. ItE4O2, 1tt403,1t8404, 114980, aDd MH-17/17. Coocerning Fermhs No- ltE4O2, 1884{F3, md lEt}|O4, 6c SEO welt corylaim rcpqr (errnmcot A) were signod by Mr. Wayrc Shehon in Sepreobcr of 1995 Dd Do srab uracr krrcl reasursctts wcne rceortrd- The 'records' obreiul by REI (Aaachmcat B) in Rbrury of 1996 are uc sigrd. 6e rcporrcd satic rrraer levEb are'O ft.', aDd e t5rpc f@ is diftr,cd- Tb ofEciel urctl coqrlctim rGPqts iDdicatc ehwpllurastq$edfqmrohorstocrsuneyicldbyairliftiry. Suchcscingeut€pgssmcamourof gIoEDd urag wes €rcdrmcrrcd h fu borcholcs. Log, yield d/or mcrhod dprying may mnt for the rreporcA pro&cioa rrc d'O gm'. ftc rrpccd $aic qra lcvct iB Gd pcll $ggFss fu crdcr tabb b a thc grmd $rfe * .hd is probabty xf, corrccL CmrUg kmit No. lI49E0 a ** A), & otrcirl rrctl coryhkn Eport oDtaincd &o@ SEO ind;r'atc" 5. *EII dcprh b 4O0 &ct od 6B $ab urc hcl b 72 fta fr@ 6c 8ratDd srficc. Tbc IDG{I uras cqlcd rrl tcod on luly 7, l9l&l.. mc nparoa yfu{d is 3 tpu nstog e beila rd au air cmpr€sstr. Tbe iduoaioo obtaincrl by RE (Atacbca B) ind'c-.,cs ttc u,cll re &illcd to a dcprh o6lOO fta oo Scpmbcr 20. lgEZ wi6 yicld of O pm ad a s-ic w:rter l6rGI of O ftca 2,1X) elcott Streeg Denver, Colo,rado 8fizrr (303) 45&5550 .*{r.'.1Tf !..6rNtEA6 ttttvg t\t w^ttl rtcmt ^I.9 rtrourcE wAtE rEano{i ^rtr t!itrD6, tarn rr^cr Dr^rN^d trE^lEN t{r8E16t trr6x DiA^eGE ^'{' n'oo <oNnoL w^sTlti^TIlcotllcrpNTIr^Tt.DtaTA{DrtrrlutPlotfcTg{ w^rtll^slDrrlr^trr{ Jaat^uY}frDt^l,t-Et r^tlttt'E[t^llDuttuTlLlcr'llo'l's WATER ENGRS I D = 3O34ElOSl7EE WELL UUMPLETION AND TEST REPORT. STATE OF COL OFFICE OF STATE ENGINEER RECEIIO: w r0!Er FAUE A' 1O FOR OFFrcE USE ONLY 3t Hi+mH APPROI/ LlGl,YSSt€r€ WELL PERMTT NUMBER :r_88402 MailingAd&ess :G336 State Cty, 5L, Zp : Carbondale, Phone: (97O) 963-3879 Ranch ffiry 133 Co. 81623 LLLOCATIONASDRTLLED: NW 1t4 SE 1t4 Sec. 25 Tvrp. 65 Range g9t{ 'ANCEFROMSECTToNLTNES: 2OOO FtFrom South Sec"Line.And l_339 FtFrom East Sec.Line.Or : LOT : BLOCK : FTUNG(UNIQ : ADORESS ATWELL LOCAT]ON : GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIO$I DATECOMP|-ETED ; Ag/24/95 ft TOTALDEPTH TypeotlHerid (Sze, Color, rtdTwe) 000-120 Volcanics, Flows L20-300 WATER LOCATED :l/' *frfi:tc adlt'-/"4 &'*o' @ HoIe is to be abandoned by cli 8. FilE(Pa.r Materid; Sze : inanra : 9. hlerffi TyPe : Depth ; 11.: Type : IITH Artt Lb€d ; oz 12. ^V1lEl.L|Eg QATA ; [ ] Check Box lf Tes D& b SubmiEed On Sr.rpdcmcntsl Form. TESTING METHOD :Aif Conpressor Static Levd ; {t PumpingLevd :total ft. Remarts : Datc/Tme Mca.rred :O B / 2 4 / 95 Datey'Ttme Measured :Og / 24 / 9 5 ltEid!t!rBaEltitrlErrdbrtttrnaqrttrs(,r{!raryro!r!bE b6tf,(Ad:rroSdo.ifa-roaFIXOCiC,tlflrEf CD-E n atrd.t-tartrl.EE') CONTRACTOR: ShdtonDrfingCorp. MailingAddress : P.O. Box 1059 nasdt, Co. 81e1 PhonE (9701 W41A. Lic. No. 1095 Name / Tiile (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President ORIGINAL I D: 3O34E|OS|7tttj f,{rJE -/ 1o 123s COLORADO D]VISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 CentEnoial Bldg. 1310 Sheflnan St. Daver, C';olondo 8@O3 (3c(i) 8563581 APPUCANT rrl/ELLPERMtT MJMBER { 88402 DtV. 5 CNTY. T3 WD 38 DEIS. BASIN MD Lo,c Rlang; APPRO\ED WEII LOCAT]ON GARFIELD COUNTY NW 114 SE 114 Section ?s Twp 6 S BANGE 8s w 6th P-M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION UNES 2OOO Ft from Sor.rth Section Une 13@ FL from Eas Seaion Une KINDALL RANCH 6336 STATE FTWY 133 CARBONDALE CO 816* (3o3)s63s879 PERMTTTO COI.ISTRIJCT A WEI.I 1) ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMTT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT coNtxrloi.ls oF aPPFOVAL This welt shal be used in such a wey as to cause no maeriat iniury to existing water rights- The issuance of the permit does not assure the appftcant that no injury will occur ro anosrer vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested wder right from seeking relief in a cMl court actiorl The consfigaion of this well shall be in compliance with the Waer well consirtrction Rules 2 ccR 4v2-2, unless approval of a variarrce has been granted by trre State Board of Examiners of Water Wen Construction and Pump ln-stallation Contractors in accordance wift Rule 18. Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-6o2(3)(b)0(A) as the_only wetl on a Eac-t of land d 43-7a acres described as the NW 1l4ot the SE 1l4ot Sec.25,fG.'b'Soun, Rng. SgWesr of theotll P-M., Garfield County. More particularty described on the atached a<hibh'N. The use cf grannd wder from dlis well is limhed to fire protection, ordinary household BJrposes insicle up ro three (3) singte ririv chreltings, inigaion of not more than one acrla d larn and garden, and lhe warering of domestic inimari such as pouhrf and tt e=toct. This welt stral! be known as Kindall Hornestead #1. The macimurn pumping rate shallnot exceed 15 GPM. The retum flo\^, from the use of tha weU must be through an indMdual wa$e water disposal qastem of the non€\raporative rype where the water is raurned to the same sueam system in whic*r dre well is located' This well shatt be consrruded not more than 2OO feet from the location specified on this permiL 2) 3) 4) s) 6) n DATE ISSUED JUL I q ts95 A-tDr-,m &liIuro"DArEJUL t r1 1997 GWS-25 .2Qt FROM:MCLAUGHLIN WAIEI< ENtt<s J ATEI< EN'U!<5 I U: JgJAEUU 'EE wRJ.lRe'- 75 '": Application must be complete where applicable. TYPe or grint in BI-ACK lN K. No overstrikes -or etasures unless initialed. coLoRADO DlvtsloN cir weree REsouRcEs 8tB Centannial Hdg., 13f3 Shcrmur St., Dcnvcr, Colordo 80203' m4Ppu.11g11!J - mailing address NAME STREET OTY Disr. ,..E8*"=f7 ltnis wett strall be used in srch a way a-s to cause-no material iniurY to existing vtrater-rigrhts'-The :r:lrA. ^^r Nt6 iha annli..an?isr.ranc" of the iermit does not ilssure the applicant tt"t no iniury will occtr to another vestcd water agfrt ot piectirae another owner of a vested water righi frdn seeking relief in a civil court action' tzl {r.zgrlo*t y"!i U- anll waiJ 7/.1t--' ot-! el-s n 4 7 Aqr,rifer Sound water is to be obteincd from; Zaa '-c,*>t!/oNW -t:o')o"'"t'- PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED EXPIRATION DA ( ) INDUSTRlAL (5) ( ) IRRTGAT|ON (5) ( ) MUNICIPAL (8) ) OTHER (9) DETAIL TT€ USE ON BACK IN (11) (4} DRILLEB BY _5t.o. i *"".r -4o I tWAt--y o(ra" .1E %. Sectio. a K (3) W{IER USE AND WELL DATA (}4 Dot{Eq19.-(11 i urvesrocr tzt ) COMMEFCIAL (4) Proposed rneximum pumtrng rae (gpm)t5 Aveage annr,ral amouot of ground watr to Ue +profiated (acrefeet):- Number of sesto be irrigled: Propoeed total dePth (feed;).2.a' Orvncr'swell ( ) HOUSEIIOLD USE ONLY ' no irrigetion 10). . FOR OFFIC USE Or,tLYt DO NOT WRITE lN THIS COLUMN Receipt Basin "^arSlL5+.< I JI A PERMTT TO |JSE GROUND WATERifr r pennarT To coNsrRucr AwELL FoR: -t$ A PERMIT ro lNsrALL A PUMP PERMIT APP!|CATIoN. FORry! ( ( } REPI.ACEMENT FOR NO. ) OTHER WATER COUffi CASE NO. rercphone Nr.3-22:E-7* 3g l;1. *o.)235 @UNTY 23 38 W-,5 '{(-c iilfi]:Zi iTii:-!'.r 2+i-; ' MCLAUGHLIN WATEF( tsNU I I Ir I !<- r MrLE. s2E11 pEEr ----*l (5) THE LOCATION OF Tl{E PRO!,O9ED ,WELL arJdreareaon' Ue indicatcd on tJ're diagran bdow' . use dre. GENTER SECTION (1 sec'tion, 640 acred for dre wetl location. +-'+ -+'- +- +--+-- + - + - + I D:3Ur3qIJUIJ',/Eb LOT-BLOCK ft-from tr4tf scc.tine(c.tt of wcn) _FlLlNG r l'38'f,ffi lf^\? (7) rl +lI I + It ! t.T I I l- I I + Il:r-:-rr trl I,l SUBDIVISION I .I I I I I I ir IL--.!---il I II --+-I I I | *iznb| -l-rI )^td l.Jl -)--I I +- I I I+++II-+-+-+- -L- - -.1- - +-lr I I rlt+-f I I I " O,n. from ft. to-ft- 'LJ t r/ in.rrom.b_fi.oa2z) o. (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS sive disonce aElElrection frorn old u€ll and plar,s for plugging (10) Owner(s): Houschold usc ad dornestic wclls must indicate rype of ditPos'I h,.-7 l-"n +-+ I INORTH r,t' i t-+l* I +--i- I++ I .i- - -.r- the onty well on *is trrct? 4aa (8) PROPO-SED CASING PROGRAII4 Plain Casing t,om O rt. to ,3O tt *o^-2O tt- 1 oo a- The scale of the diagrarn is 2 inqhes = 'l mile Each small regresents 40 acres" WATER EOUIVALENTS TABLE (Rouod.d Fi'Jsr6) A^ as+foor co\.efs I 6cre ol lfnd 1 foo! deeO 1 cubic foot ,€r second (cfs) , , ,449 gsllorr3 rer minutB (gExn) A tamily of 5 will r@uire appcorimately 1 gcr+{oor ol w9131 P6 YGrr. 1 scrdoor , . .43,560 csbic fe3r . . - 325,9oO gslloa3- 1,O0O gpm gumpfd conrinuoudy for one 6-/ Foducs.4'42 aqe'futt- Le6al descriPtion: I t -{- I I casing LOCATED (11) QETAILED DESOBlEflCll{. of the use of-glound water: t used on-thir land. including wells' Give Regi and Warcr Coun Case Nunbers. Tyge or right Used for (PurPosc)Description of land on wfiich usccl 5lATCtSi THAT TTTE IruTORMATION SET FORTH HEBEON IS OF HIS KNOWLEDGE- gGNATURE Usr addhionat shectt of papcr it more spaoc ls rcquircd. uT WAf El( EF L'l<5 I ' r^rLr t ,-a rrafat ETf.,ntll allh ?rt+lr F lu:JUJaogga99 WE,LL UOMPLETION AND TEST REPORT BffiffoEUsEoi.lY 3LSTATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF STATE ENGINEER 0t rB's H"ffiffi APFRO'AL I GT,VS31.'I.{B WELL PERMT NUMBER :188403 OWNERS ].{AME (S):Kinda Ranch Hwy 133 co. 8L62s MaitingAddress :6336 State ciy, sr, zp : carbondale, Phone:. (97A) 953-3879 LOCATIONASORILLED: NE 114 SE 111 Sec. 25 Tu4r. 65 Range g9t{ FROM SECTION LINES : 16?5 Ft From South Sec. Una And L46 Ft From East Sec. Line. Or ' LOT : BLOCK : FILING (UN|T) : ADDRESS AT WELL LOCATION : DATECoMPLETED : Oe/2s/95 ft. TOTAL DEPTH TyF cf frA.rhl Fize, Colo., sd Ty?e) 000-160 olcanics, Flows L60-300 lJo st'/'; a/q-'hu'/ RETTARKS ' 4A @ Hole is to be aband.oned. by'clie t- Fi&rPed( Matedal: S?C : Intenral : 9. PaderPlacerrcrn Type : Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD: 11.: Type : HTH An'rt Used : oz. 12 lU:l-!-:lEiT DATA ; I Check Box lfTestData bsubaibed On Supflernental Form. TESTING METHoD :Aif Conpressor StdicLeryd: fi. Date/TimeMeanrred:OA/25/95 Produ<lionRate: O gpm_ Pumfinglevd :Tota1 fr DatdTimeMecured :08/25/95 TestLen$r : 2 hr3. Remarts : LladE-w!tr*rE*rtntwlEqlitEEl rditE'nttEborkroLor.(Arrtbr.(!"i2a4loa(lEO)Cilt.trrd.to,btrDrEtrqtllltrFlrrhh-qddagoarr, CONTRACTOR: Shelton Drtng Corp, Phone (97O't 92741&2 M&rgAddress : P.O. Box 1059 BGaI, Co. 81621 Uq No. 1095 Name lTtte (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President ORICINAL COMPLETEDDEPTH : .... ft- I D. 3O34ElO9768 rAUE -' <Q---T[ffi-6- GWS.25 16 . 22 FROM . MCLAUGHL I N ITATER ENGRs COLORADO DTVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Oenterrniol Bldg. 1313 Sh€,mEn SL, Dcnvq, Colorado 8@3 (sos) B6&ss61 1235 APPLICANT KINDAII RANCH 6336 STATE FTWY 133 oARBONDAI-E CO 8162& (303)s6s387s PERMIT TO @NSTRUCT A WELL WELL PEHilrr NUMBER t 884(13 DIV. 5 CNTY, B \Jl,D 38 DES. BASIN MD LoE Filing: APPROyED WELL LocAnoN GARFIELD COUNTY NE 'tl4 SE 114 Secrion 2s Twp 5 S RANGE 89 w 6th P'M' 16/5 Ft from Souh Sedion Une 146 Fr from East Section Line 1) ISSUANCE OF THIS PERi'tT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDMO}.IS OF APPROVAL This weil shall be used in sr:ch a way as to cause no mderial iniury to exisung wder rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicaru that no iniury will occur t6 ananer vested water right or preclude another owner of a v6ted water rigm from seeking relief in a civil court action. The construclion of rhis we[ shafi be in compliance with the Water well construciion Rules 2 CcR 4o2-l unless approval of a variance has been granted Oyine SEte Board of Examiners of water Well Construaion and Pump lnstatlalion Cornractors in accordance wilh Rule 18. Approved pursuant to CRS gz-y2-w2(g,)tU)00(A) as the only well qr a tract of land of 38.66 acaes described as the NE U4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 2s, Twp. 6 Siriilt: Rng. 89 WLst of tre &h P.M., @rfielcl County. More particularly ctescn'lrcct on the atached exhibh 'A'. The use of gror.rnd water from this well is limited to fire proteclion, ordinary household Purposes inside up.to three (3) s;ingle Amify dwellings, inigation of not more than one acre of lairm ana garOen, and the watering of domestic iri'imafs such as pouttry ana fivestock. This well shalt be known as Kindatl Homestead #Z The nra<imum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. The retum flow from the use of the well musi be tt[ough an indMdual waste waer disPosal system of the non-araporative type where the waer is renrmed to the sarne stream q/stem in which the well is locaed- This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet frorn the locdion specified on dris permit 2l 3) 4) s) 6) 4 DArE rssuED JUL I 4 tggs DPTRATToNDATEJUL I q $97 FROM.MCLAUGHLIN WATER ENU|<U ( } REPI,ACEMENT FOR NO. ( }OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO. I lJ: r5(r.raOgs a@EMAY-13-sle 16,22 wR.J'SRcv' 76 rl NAME STREET CXTY COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCf$ECEIVED Application must be comPlgte where ?plicable. Type or print in BI+CK INK- Noolersrrikes iIaastres unless initiated. tti-+PPUcerur - mailing addres PERMIT APPLJCATION FORM l.'z1 A PERMTTTO USE GROUNO WATEB &i a pERrrrrtT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL fOR: P( A PERMIT TO INSTA.LL A PUMP FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:OO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Receipt No- Basin 315 tt5 h, This well shall be used in E ch a way a.s to cause *'-*.ioiil iniurv to existing water.rights.-The iirii"i "tlrre ierinit does not asstrre the applicam it.i-no i"ir.v'wilt occur to anodter vested water riotn ot pr-ectude another owner of a vested water ffii;i froir u.ering relief in a civil court action'**,too{ii-/ Al F z otln"-SE-- z. Secdon ^J' Number of acresto be ffiated:r/j Propccd total <lePth tt"ott @ aL-l ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0)i.tll#:W;"t i iiHRiS"ri'6-'El i icor'auEidrar- tct ( ) MUNIcIPAL (8) *" {' ,t . 4ro, g ll{a c;*'o,/ 1ag, rl-r., -ubll /.J c, Q orfl DATE ISSUED ,.*'{: \)ost>+;c CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL *.e oLf u/,/ (ec- ta il; i{ A r"*. {, 5. ,ils.Rne. A? 1tZ. cldtie (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Propos€d maximum pumpirlg rate (grpm)t6 ( ) OTHER (9) DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) (4) DBILLER Nanre Srrcct Ti*;Bi::i iiiir?i i..:'.,,,i'r PERMTT NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE 8Y tn eguifer grognd warer is to be obained ,o?*3"i*, I 7k23 t ? Lic- No-/23's CNIINTY L 3 3_B Di3r. tzl )to be ipProPriated (acrefeet): I Lr: rtgJAEgs aEo V MCLAUGHLIN WATER tsNtjl<s (6} THE WELL MUST BE LOCATED BELOW 0 /6d,f rt.t?^ %scc.rine(oorflr or taruth) I Zl 6 --rt. rrom +q?f ,. sea tine(Grt ot wcn) {S}''THE LOCATTON OF THE PROPOSED WELLarctheir€Bon'-' ;hEE diagram below' . Ufe the. CENTER SECTION (1 section. 64O acrel for tre well location. LOT-BLOCK-FILING +- SUBDIVISION L!9AIE9 No. of acres fr" to- ft, 17t -i t I I +-+-+ t'I rrlfTT r- III+-+-+l,IJ- I lDlllg,HIlfitlo,i+ +-TA?ta.-12 . r1-*r + +tl ' ill r+- -{-- +Ir+++Itf-+--+ l mile -+'- +-+--+- -'l ++++ I r NORTH SECTION LINEt'[rl, ,,L- - -l Izr r f -T--trl il,r- i' "V ',.rft I ' ,Fl rilt'ttfl;t,t T--r- l-Tq1,,.3- I SOUTH SECTION LINE Iri++lrtl -f-+-+-+- Tlre *ale of the diagram is 2 inctres = 1 +- + ii+ I+-+ t r NORTHT l_ t- l-l - I *--+ I++ I +-+ the only well on thistaaJ* (8) PROPOSEp CA$NG qROGRAM Plain Casing )br/Zin.kom 0 *.to 70 *- .& .5n.to - ?916 9-42n. Perforated casing q f in.tcom 4 fr> rt.o 21 Q n. WATER EOUIVALENTS TABLE (ROUNdsd Fi9UTTS) A! acfoot covers t acre of laDd I foot de€o I q,rbic foot par saconC (efs) , . . ztlg g.llons ger minute (gprn) A family of 5 wi{l require opprrcximstely I ocrc.foor of walc( p€r Ye!r. 1 rraloot . - - 43,560 qrbic feet . . .325.9OO gollms- 'l.ooo gom psmpfd continuously for onr drY 9(oducta 4.42 aq}{ast. Legpl dercription: (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS sivedistance anO direeioo from old well and plans for plugging -of acres:38-[L Hourhold ura and donrestic weltr mu$ indic.E rype of 1**a 4O acres-Each srnall (10) Owner(s) (11) OETAILEq.DESCRIPTION of rh{8of eround water: 3YsEmrobcusad- 3 -a-n*L M u*d on rhis land, including wells. GiviRegistration and Water Coun Case Numbers- Used for (purpose)Description of land on which usdd (121 TyPe or rightt/r tlr rlI_T-T-T- rli t -+ I ! I I I I I t t_T t I ( RMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. U:c rddhionrl thcctr ol gacrrr lf morc spacq ir rrquirrd. WtrI I PERMITNUMBER:188404 MailngAddres :5336 State City, St, Zp : Carbondale, Phone: (97O) 953-3879 Ranch Hlry 1.33 Co. 81623 LOCATIONASDRIIItrD: SE 1t4 NE 114 Sec. 31 Tup. eS Range ggw 'ATICEFROMSEC]]ONUNES: 2355 FtFrom Norttr Sec.LiDe.Arrd S9I FtFrom East Sec-Line.Or : LOT : BLOCK : FIUNG (UNII) : ADDRESS AT WELL L@ATION ; DATE COMPLETED : 09 /08/95 ft. TOTAL DEPTH Type dl,laterid (SiD, Cobr, end Tlfe) ooo-L80 150-500 /,b rfifi azfir^&,4k - REMARKS: @ Hole is to be abandoned by clieu 8. Fb.PrcI M*erid: Size i lnbnrd : 9. Pd(erPlacirlcrn Type : Depth : 11.; Type : tIfH ArnL Used : oz. 12 !UE-L^L IEQT.QATA : [] Chack tsox lf Test Data Is Submired On SrpCenrentd Form. TESING METHOD :Aif Compressor Stdlc L6 d : fL Date/Time Measored :o9 /08/95 Produclirn Rate : O gpm- PumringLwd :Total ft. DateJTimeMeasured :O9/Ae/95 TesLengtt : 2 hrsi Remarls : COf{TRACTOR: Sheton Dfing Corp. MdngAddress : P.O. Box 1059 Basat, Co, E1621 (1$k)CRS, lh rdrg C Lt.i.il cilnrFt, hlr tElt oryG E Phonc (9701 52741C2 Lic. No, 1095 Name / Trde (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President gcr 3 ''StrEAir ;'!a{m'stt, .:,i;tca..) APPROVAL T Glrrrs3l{103 ORIGIN GHLIN WATER ENGRS I D: 3O3{luU9','E t: ypj-5,ft6v.76 Application must be comglete where aoolicable. TYPe or rint in BLACK tNK- No ovemrikes ileras,lte. unless initialed- @ilirsaddress l2l This well shall be used in- rych a uay 1l:. to cause ,J''tiii.iili iniury to existing water'rights' The issuance of tne permri doet not ass''rc the aPPlicant ffi*; itir"v'will occtrr to another vested water ;;ht';-, pt*ria" another ownl-gf a vestd water H'd; ;H-&lis idLr in a civil court action' k , *')" (3) ,4U, l' - No 2..rtJ Number of acres to be irrigmed: i Propoad toal dep6 tlr*tl' 6 trt Aquifer grotrnd rvoter i3 to be obtained from;640 ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation {O) ;- .. A^^rEa?r. Itl - ( ) INDUSIRIAL (5)l*l?l#H33,1'1, i rriircerioN(6)I iEb^riiliEi"i- i.) ( )MUNTcTPAL (8)rF:il,i i'i:H$:ifi tlli$ !+'f ii app r- I car r o nr xiffi dii -dt'trnrii'':; il OTHER (9I DETAIL THE US€ ON BACK IN (11) PERMIT NUMBER OATE ISSUED EXPIRATION DATE P Q'r ?d6tu COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES-.^ 818 Centenniel Bldg-, dii'"t*tt"t St.' Denvcr' Colorado-80ffi''' RECEIVED PERMIT APPLICATIoN FORM HAT l CSg i ;E I Ul+ 13 S=.*3F'ofl+o"\f=''-T roa: Q a bEnMlr ro TNSTALL A PUMP ( ) REPLACEMENTFOR NO. wATm cowr cAsE NO' Foa orrrcE usE oNLY: @ *,^n ? =/.) ''q tr ,L ot ttn-^AG-%, Section 3 | - i,* c ,F.;^*. gg H -6-?M ProposeO maximum pumprng 'stg (gPm) I q Averge annual atnount of ground water A; O.-.PProonated (acre-@tl:. ' ' Rece,pt*".3t5115D , 31a lr."s a.'.{t. t ,1.d )o'oJ Szc 7l^* '-'/ (4} DRILLER )42<,{3^x??*"97A-29i?Uc. No- BY -tQ ' S eouNTY .a3 5'L' 4.:r. X ,ri, NAME STREET Stret ciw C)TYI 1n {-r'z(zez) TELEP-HONE NO. Disc rFUE I D : 3E,3.luo:J7tsiEi rAUE ana z0 COLORADO DMSION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg- 1313 Shcnnrn St, Dcnvcr, Colorado 8o2G} (3O3) 86&3sE1 123s API'UCANT wErL PERMTT r.rtffBER ,l RR4O4 DIV. 5 CNTY. Z3 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD Ffiag: APPROVED WEI.I LOCATTON GARFIELD COUNTY SE 114 NE 114 Section 31 Twp 6 S RANGE 88 W 6th P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION UNES 2355 Ft from Norfi Section Line 591 FL trom East Seaion Line KINDATI RANCH 6336 STATE FIWY 133 CARBONDATE CO 816& (38)s633E79 PERMIT TO COI{STRI.,IGT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMTT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT coND,lnoNS OF AEPBOVAL 1) This we[ shall be used in such a way as to cause no rnatedal iniury to existing water rigms The issuance of the permil does not ;lssure the applicant tf,rt no iniury will occrrr to another vested water right or preclude another Owner Of a vesfed water right from seeking relief in a civil court action- 4 The constnraion of this well shall be in cornpliance wffi the Waer Well Construc{ion Rules 2 CCR g2-Z unless approval of a variance has been grranted by the State Board of Examiners of Warer Well Construaion and Pump lnsallation Corrractors in accordanoe with Rule 18' 3) Apprwed Fursuant to cRS 37-92SO2(3)(b)0lxA) as the onty welt on a tract 9f larld ot 39.2' acres described as- rhe sE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of sec. st, Twp. d Sb.,tn, Rng. E8 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield Counv. More paniculatly ctescribed on the anached ofiibit'A'. 4) The use of ground waer ftom this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household PurPoses inside uP to three (3) single fa*ify dweltingg inigation of not more than one acre of lar/n and garden, and the watering of domesic animatl suctr as poulqf and fvestock This well shall be knorn as Kindall Homestead #4- 5) The maximtrm pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The retum flow from the use of the well must be through an individual wase wder disposal system of the nona/aporative type where the water is retumed to the same stream system in wtricfi the wetl b located. n This well shall be consbucled nd more than 200 feet frorn the location specified on this oermit'@n,,-r, A,>f '- *f{n i DArE rssueo JUL 1 q t}95 3.r,^ ro* DArE JUL t { lggl Block:Sqbd,v: TJA(jts I5/ 269766 (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PHOP,O9ED ,W-EL.LarJ the area on *hich tfre water wilt be used must bqindicated on dre diagram below. Use the CENTER SECTION (1 sestion. 640 acres) for thewell location- (7) + I I I I-F l I ! I II _T I It I-+ -+ + I + + + I I --i-'- +- -+-- +- + I< r M'LE, rrgo *ta4l+++++ I; r NoRTI'l SECTION L[!E - t - lllbril-+- '1-- L; it4a;;i rr EgL- I _ i- t _Elilrll'l,lI SOUTH SECTION LINE ;tlrr+++llrtl -+-+-+--F-+ +- + I It+ I+-+ I r NORTHT ll. ! +--i- I Ir-lr Ij--+ I+ t I-+ The scale of rhe diagram is 2 inches = I mile Each small square represenu 40 acres. wATeR EO.UTVALENTS TABLE (Rorrrrded Figurcs) An acre-foot covers I acre of land 1 foor dc€o 1 clrbt€ tcot p.r racond (cfs) . . , .tag getlorr p€t minute (gpal A famity of 5 will requite aPptoti,nalelY 1 lcrG.foot of wet6 p€" y6ar- t acre.foor . - .43.5@ ssbic feet . . . 325,9@ galhr. l.OO gom osmPe6 coatinuo{5ly l9r one da/ prodrrccs 4.42 act+f.€t- Legel descriptioni (11) DETAILE? DESCRIPTION ot :tl.9u* of sround water: sy$cmtobeutd-? - _ ^ / -*- --?- n used on this land, incruding wells. Give Rfoistration and Water Coun Case Ntrnbers. Used for (gurpose)Description of land on whicfr uscd (121 TYPe or right.'1 t (6} THE WELL MUST BE LOCATED BELOW by distances from section lines- 2-158 ft. from Ncr*1, ssc. ttne- (nofin or rourn) ,r9 I ft. rrom E".afr sec- rine(crst o. w6t) LOT_BLOCK_FILING r_ SUEDIVISION thc only well on rhis uactT-z(49 (8) PROPOSEp CASIN9 PROGRAM Ptain Ccing .tcom--Q--A-o3-Q--tt in.tcocrt 20 rt.* 6-*o n casr-ng in- from - ft. to- ft- u?Z ia.tamlfD a.o-@-n. (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS eivedistence a;d direilfrom old well and plansforglugging it: i ,/4 Horahold urc md domcstic wells must irdicatc type of dLgosd ,G\ l-ocArED (13)THE APPLICANT(S) TRUE TO THE BEST STATE(S) THAT THE ]NFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. No- of otu"r"r, 3? bO ilGNATRE OF ER ENGRS ID:3O34ElCr97EEi COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Cenennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Colorado 8O2Gt rAUE /x-W-EAY=T3-98wRJ.i-?(e". 76 .-. Application must be complete where applicable- TYPe or print in BLACK !!.!! No overstrikes or erasures unless initialed. PERMIT APPLICATIOry F9RM il A PERMIT TO IJSE GROUNO WATER( } A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL FOB: ( )APERMITTO INSTALLAPUMP WATER COURT CASE NO. (1) APPLICANT - mailing address NAME Nil(t ffiarthrsrtle srneerBoX \OA 11 CITY TELEPHONE NO. ga3- +tbt (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL -,n* GfteF-tirn r*,r. (,,, ].. nnn. ?" flJ. -h-P.M(E.w) This well shall be used in gJch a way as to cause no materiat iniury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not as$Jre the applicant that no iniury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court-action. t^-^ .\FiRcvEO AS A REftTCEMENT OE WETIJ W.@ r!-,9 EOSTNG WELI MUST B€PLUGG:ED AI'ID ABANDONED ACCORDING TO THE R6[/ISED AN9 A}'ENDED RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR WAT=R WELLAi\{) PUi\T-O INSTALLATION COi.ITP;fiORS. THE ENCLOSED AFFiDAVIT MUST BE sutsMITTED WITHIN SXTY (60) DA'ts AFTER THE col'isTRucTtoN oE rHE NEVV WELI- N;RR^r!NG rHAII wzulnoJ-. 'aia-wAs PI-UGGED AtD ABANDoIED' to b€ approptiated (acr+feet): Number of acres to be irrigated: ftoposed total depth (feet);25o Aquifer ground water is to be obeined frcrn: Enno ono Gfaoo:L - . O,vner's well designation GRO.UND.WATER TO BE USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0)( ) TNDUSTRTAL (5) ( } IRRIGATION (6) ( ) MUNICIPAL (8) FL z.orthe hld.Y.,section AL ( N,SI (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA p16p9sed maximum pumptng rate (gpm) Average annuel amount of ground water t5 D(t DoMESTIC (1)( ) utvesrocK (2) ) COMMERCIAL (4) ) orHER (9) OETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) (4) PRILLER Name ttLutlv LU EE0;o 88a BE.ffi.ffi- (x) RqPllcEMENr FoR No. ,l tf lU o - : FOR OFFICE USE ONLY; DO NOT.WRITE lN TFIIS Receipt No. Basin ztotl Dist. r-5 APP L ICAT I O N APP RO.V-EB PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED l( ,w2 Telephone No,,.'". *". 8?{-'-38 COUNTY 23 -=MAF13-9El 16,24 FROM=MCLAUGHLIN WATER ENGRS I D ' 3O34E}697Ei6 FAGE 16/26 THIS. FORM.II IJST BE SUBMITTE D fiT}IIN 60 OAYS OF COMPLETION oF iHE woRK DEscRlBEo HERE' ON. TYPE OR PRINT IN BLAC( INK. ADDRESS DATE COMPLETED llt COLCRADO DIVISION OF WATER BESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street - Roofir 818 Denver. Colorado E0203 WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REFORT pERMrr Ntn BER ll.fl?Xo BECEIVED {o JUL 2 6 B8A S€E E sillTE " wELLowNER-lt'hit<t fYl8nrlJrs-rl 5F .%orthe-nl^/ o$t". 32 t/L p.u. .1992- HoLE DTAMETER -l in. from D to / --q ft. --i1-j6. from l2-\ ,o 4OA n. in. from to - ft- DRTLLING uanoo (*|rcl +Rat42Ll CASING RECORD: Plein Cering Size a & kind Stteu from O 16 55 ft. size-f &kind Pi*srrctuo^ 7G ,o lLo n. Size 5 & kind .?J-*,trqrom .7o ,o ^z.ao-fr Perforoted C;aing Size 7 & kind 3zr-:zt- rro* 55 to I 25- fT size 5" &kind ?t+=l'ctrom lLo 16 €co 1. Size-&kind from-to-ft GROUTING RECORD Cs nts tr 5'rntsl Material Intervals ptacement Method Gea piB - GRAVEL PACK: Size lnterval TEST DATA DateTested -il- -,$L Static Water Level Prior to Test v- 't"-Tt Type of Test PumP Lensth of rest .i-Jla u +--- Sustained Yield (Metered).7 G.7. n &'lo rt WELL LOG c t4 Lftvh borrr$zBS 1an6 2*Aoo Rto fi i,?ier ltoo Kto Rock Foraoto-rion TOTAL OEPTH Type and Color of Material Use additional Pagct 4oo / Final Pumping Watcr Lwel From To water Loc. cl9766 PAGE rc/:zci lp, ltltc Lvr'A.llts'lr \''l Illl t r1\'r va'LlJ ILLIL'lru ulsot:,t-tt I tvl .ffifohffi water wiii-Sffidiasram betow. I UvaisuncerTrom recdon line6. Use the CENTER sEcrloN (l section, 640 acres) for ttre well tocation' I 15 qo ft. from ErqItF^1, , seq rine r + - + - + - + - +- +- - + - + - +l + -Tno-iirti6i6- I I lfi oc rt. rromI I rMrLE,s,.oFEEr-j ll lffOO ft.from+.F#soc.line t++++++++ | Lor-BLocK-FtLlNG *- I I I suBorvrsroN I t I ' I ll eOeareo oryner:hri-KzWVrrrlrr(r:E+""1'"+ Er-+-T-+-* -r- -l *o.or.",* \Q---l*rthisbe;t =t ;^ i ; Iil il"."";TI -l r I r 16 . I I*TT E ; T[talpRoposEpcAstNG.pRoGRA!! ll ;l I I I lE llnaincasirB+1. Hi--T-l-*-j= + -l J in.r.o- o 1.16too r. I rl l_+- ) lr, t-i- I I_r-- I I II I I I I L]N I I t i I I tl-in.rrom-t.to-f. + - -{- - - -f - -Ll Perforatedcasing I I I f l 5-in-rrom '6ct rt'1o25o t' I r t + + + + + +l -ln.trom-ft.to-ft. ffTI r I I tltsrr.l--+ -+ -+-+-+ -+ -+- - +l ?il t The scale of tfie diagram is 2 inches = 1 mile I + Fl5oo Eactr stnatl squar-e represents 40 aoes. I 2oO ' fO ?AST. Fl\\ o\$ trJFtl tr)\\^CQrtt?rff (10) Owner{s) :No. of acres: Legal (1I) DETAILED DESCRIPTION of the use of ground water:Hoosehold use end domertic welh must indicate type of disposal synem to be u3ed- Hor:ss ontr I n (12) OTHER WATERIIGIIIS used on rhis tand, including wells. Give Registration and lrYater Court Case Numbers. Used for (purpose)Description of land on which used WATER EOUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figurec) An acrlfoot @vcc 1 acre of land 'l (oot dGeP I cubic loor per second (cfr) , , . 449 gatlons per minute (gpml a f8mity of 5 wilt require epprorimalelv I acre-lool ot water 9r+ ycer. I acr+foot .. . 43560 cubic feel . . . 325,9@ gotlon3. 1,00O ggm oumged continuously for one dey produccs 4.42 acr+fect- FOR R EP L AC EMENilTVE-L-LS sive distance and direction from old well and plans for plugging Type or right (I3} THE APPLICANT(S} TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. o.a L( STArE(S) THAi rHe INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON lS AtrLtcAA dtfriJ yGNATUFE or - ',-- :i!n\; . JJV\ (tflst !.trM rhi Usc additional sheets of papct if more space ir requircd' Llo .MCLAUGHLIN WATER ENGRS rD- 3634€,Osl766 I-A(;E 2t / 2a WATER Make Gor'rldsPurnp I ype 5ES0?&12 \ raer.e \ S.-s\\-- Powered by .Eleqtric HP -3/4 Pump Serial No. Motor Serial No- Ko 58005 L82 Date lnstalleo 5-&-8j - Pump lntake Depth 246' Remarks II'ELL TEST OATA wTH PERMANENT PUMP Date Tested Static Water Level Prior to Test Length of Test Sustained yield ( Metered) Pumping Water Level Hours Gprvt CONTRACTORS STATEMENT The undersigned, being duly pump installation descri thereof, and that the oath, deposes and says that he is the contractor of the well or t made hereon; knovrrs the content License N". ..1j96 State of Colorado, county or --E6rfig1d SS Subscribecl and sworn to betore rre tn,c 2gljlll"v of Februarr'r - , 19 --&' FORM rO a€ MAOE ouT lN oUAORUPLTCATE: $ltilTt, FORM rrrort br rr oriliorl oogv on bolrt 'i6 rn alrrd. t nttyE ANO CREEN copr. murr b. tir.d urh ih. S6t. En9i67. PINl< CeY ir lor ttr Owfrcr rod YELLOW CO'Y It lot dre Orllht. coNE OF D€PRESSION Remarks Mv Commissiontn,^. wffiLo- :25 FROM:MCLAUGHLIN S,ATER ENGRS I(EUrt v Lt, w EE0;,0 Paa ffi,ffi si#-',=,^ -..j 5r c;#:_;: I Ll: 3It3{uvr:J,,lfE Apptication must be comPlete where applicable. TYPe ordint in BLACK lNK No overstrikes or erasures unless initialed. COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 @ntennirl Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 PE RM rT APPLTCATION EO.RM. ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER } A PERM]T TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP ( ( FOR: ( (x) REPI-ACEMENT FOR NO. II ,I1'.6 ..( iorr-ren , r" WAIER COURT CASENO. . ( / ti---- ' SEj: g ; :l:i, .$liTl.: ,.: .j-i.- ",' ';s.,r:::. j:. l.l.:)1j? (1) APPLICAN.T - mailing address NAME t{ti\(z SarthtsrER srneer-Box lOa J1 CITY TELEPHONE NO. q23- +tLt (Z) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL _,",rGffEHitn S e z. of tne \1 ld %. Section 3 7- r*p. (o S-, **. 33- Jr), L t-,- (N.s)(E,W (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA ftoposed maximum gumping rate (gpm) Average annual amount of ground water [-5to be oppropriated (act*feet): Number of acres to be irrigated: Propored total dePth (feet):250 Aouifer grround water is - 5. o66i6gd from: 6qno Ono Gfaqotl O,vner's well designation GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY ' no irrigation {0) DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (1 1) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY; DO NOT-WRITE tN THIS Receipt No- Basin 7?ott r APPLICATION APPROVED Dist. l5 This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights- The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no iniury will ocanr to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water rigtrt froiir seeking relief in a civ-1|- co-urt action- App,,iCvEo ASA REilrmrrs*_Of ,,rrEltj t{o,.Z@ i'r;g D(ISTING WEIL t{USf BEPII.IGGED AND ABANDNED }.C'ORDING TO T}IE REVISED AT'ID A}'ENDED RULES AND REGUI-ATIONS FoR WATER r^rELL AN-r PUylP INSTALISTION COI.ITPACTORS. THE ENCIOSED AFFIDAVIT MUST BE SUtsfuTTTED WTTHIN SD{W (60} DAYS AFTER THE. coiisrRucTtoN oErHE NEVtf WEU-AFnRMING IHAIwuio. zazauwns nueGEn AIQ AEANDONED. i;(1 oouesrrc trt( I LIVESTOCK (2} ( } COMMERCIAL (4) ( } INDUSTRIAL (5) ( ) TRRTGATION (61 ( ) MUNICTPAL (8) ( ) orHER (9) (4) DRILLER *.-"SIL,Y.^DF \\ i n\ Co S,r"o Cf., rcrephone *. Q2z -SS3 Lic. No. S9y EXPIB.ITION DAfut t'-38 @UNTY x YJRJ-5;Rcv,76 LAUGHLIN S,ATER ENGRS w Oicated on the cliagram below' Use the CENTER SECT]ON (1 section, 640 acres) for tre well location. I D. 3Et3{ucr57bb rAgE 394 -o -+-+ I I++ I-+-+ I++ I+-+ I I++ I-+-+ I t++ I --+- - + -+-+-+--"L-+ l{- r M;LE, s28o FEET --}l+++++ t; r NORTH SECIION LINE -^L[,lrl+-r-I-r-+i i*l; l;9l ,lrlE Sltlll=El ,l,l==p--r--T-T-T?l,lrl -1,r,-rI souYl.t SECTION LINE III+++++rtl -+-+-+-+---F + + + I f + + + + NORT t I +- I t + I + I INoR r1 rl I+- I + If- I I-+-lx I I-T- i I-+- I I I I-+- I The scale of the diagram is 2 inches = 1 mile Each small square 4O acres. WATER eoulvALeNTS TAELE (Rounded Figures) An screfoot covers 1 acre of land I foor cteap t cubic foot per recond (cfs) . . . 449 9'gl10A3 9cr minulc (gpm) A famity of 5 will require approximately 1 scttstoor o, weter' 9cr v6ar. 1 acre.foot , . .43,550 cubic fes - . .32530o gallon!. 1,00O gom oumped continuosrlv for one dcy producEs 4.42 acr$feet. by dinances from section lines. 15oO rLtum F$lllDE*i-rcc.'rinc t I aocl n.from-I.LtEIE-rcc.Iinc(arsi-of w.st) LOT-BLOCK -FlLlNG * - SUBOIVISION (7) LOCATED Orner: rr,til<z Yl\afilA(fEE No- of acres \ O - Will this be the only well on tnic tractZ h9 S (8) PBOPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Cacing J ,n.rro-6 1e lO0 rt. in. from -ft- to-fl Perforated casing 5-- in. from loet tt. .o 45S t . in. from ft- to- ft' '''5oo' To no"f]n 2oo' To ?AJf Fril ors rDrll o\-n^Cemtlg; o (11) ryficm to be frl9. 9f ssres;'1o of rhe use of grou.nd water:Household usc and domertic wellr must indicate type of dispord I r4 (9) FOR REPLACEMEI\!T WELLS givedistance ana Olrection trom old well and ptans for glugging (ii) Offfgn Wafgn ntCXfS used on this land. inctuding wells. Give Registration and Water Coun Case Numbers- Used for (purpose)Description of land on which usedType or right (13)THE APPLICANT(S) TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. o.s Usc addirional 3hcctr of pepor if more sprcc ir rcquircd' use aootttonal thccts ot oaocr It dtore 30acc It rcQulteo' STETEISI THAT THE INFOBMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS 'aezLrcANT6t dMl,I ll/t description: S,cNArule Of- i: ', itA @ Fpoll .MCLAUGHLIN WATER ENGRS ID,3O34BO97EE P,Feur\vltuJLrir+ EBz/1998 I'AGE 23/26 . Cor.rrtesy of Shelton Drilling Corp. (s7o) 9274182 lnficrmation Conceming SubdMsion : PERMTT# NAME 114980 Manchester MH-1Tffi Hood 18frc.2 Kindall (1) 188404 Kindall (3) 188403 Kindall(2-A) B€cr&ErG$EF lgsg YIELD DEPTH STATIC LEGAL OESCRIMON. SE l.lt / Sec 32 T65 R89W ilE NE Sec 25 TES RE9W NW SE S€c 25 TOS REgw SE NE Sec 31 TGS R88W NE SE Sec 25 T65 RSsw 0400005000030000450008100 0.0 494 OATE '9t20t82 7ROr91 Et24t95 9/8A5 6t17txi Y- I 3-SlB 16.26 FROM.PAGE 22/26 AITACEMENTB WET-L RECORDS OBTAINED BY RESOURCE ENGII\IEERING INc. {UGHLIN TATER ENGRS ID:3o34E,Bsl7EE I-AUE Zq/ ZO sI TYELL CONSTRUCTION A-ND TEST REPORf irATE oF qoLoR PqLoFFtcE oF TI{E sf,ATE ENctN I UELL PEilT NTTBER 188402 lrsAqA6ess : re$eHury l33 I Cfry,SL Zp: CabnCaE Co. Bf6a3 IPhdE (gro) S€srrr) | OETANCES FROTI SEC. IJ},IES:2W tt fua Sodir Sea ttE. md 1399 fL fio sl,.Eot\fistotrl r uoT I STREET ADORESS AT VI/EI,j- LOCATION : APPROVA T! Gl,rsgr€liqtffi m Ed Se.eE ORBLOCK FruNGruMI) GROUND SIJRFACE EIEVATIOT{ OATECOMH-EIED trtt21tsr5 TOTALDEPTH 300 ft. DEpTHCOMpLETED fr. 5.GEOLOGIC LOG :| ..***,,TO(tODepfi I ryp.oruacral@ 9.0 0.0 30(f-IZg | \rbeafucs, FhEffil wrarca-rarnasr - - 6.5 s0 300 7- PIJIN OASIT.IG qr(n)KirE r,qTSl.E ffi(r)Io (E) o o 0 PERF. CASING: Screen SIOI SiEe: I,\ATER LOCATED : REIiARKS : Flobbtobeabndonedbydienu 8- F'iilerPack ftl#td: Sta: lntenal: 9. Pad(erPErnent TlPe : Depdr 10.GROUNT.IG RE@RD : lffi A,rE lr D!ilt,{fiEnd PtrcarrEfil 11. OlSlNFECTlOi.l: Type: HTH Amt Us€d: oiL 12. IVE-L TEST DATA : I I €hcck Box tf Test De b $kdted On Srmlenpntal Form TESflNG METHOD : AfCorrpcssor O gPfiI 2 lr?s. StfE Lad : . O C- ETrrp lleaoned : OSfZ4rgs nrnphgl,.evd : Total fL Ot/Iinplneasr.red : 08124/95 fLnraE : ftotlndim Rate Testlengrth: ,? fli-datmrEErdEr,rqlrrrad.cl!.trtail--- tirrtita g!-lt- -E.rrrraD-..-t n*E) CONTRACTOR : SHrr Ot0iltg Corp. fEra Arl{tEr - O Ct Ekw tn<o n:r ..Yt trAr{ .(r5xarg,t:5. [rc.trEIE Ptpne : (S/O) 9,741&. I ie Na '11106 (Pra.aF iartE/ Tib 1P1s6. Type a ftit) V\frpe Shelton / Presidert S;Sfiaure Dd' og'il1t$ UTEII CONSTRT'CTION AND TEST REPORT ;sirEoF coLoRADO, OFFTCE oF THE STATE ENGINEER I ilblng&fess Cty. St Z1p: Ptgte 63KL $relfny 133 CrlooCate, Co. 81@3 (s70) B3E7s USTANCES FRCIvI SEC. U[.IH* 1g/l5 A tun Sot lt Sea une. a*, 1.(6 fi. fiom Eas{ Sec- he- OR St EDMSIOI{: LoT BLocK FTUNG(1N;1) STREET ADDRESS AT IN,EII LOGATIOTTI : OATE COiTIP! ETED 08r25IlI5 TOTAL DEPIT 3m fL DEFTTH COMPLETEb ,t 'uiwr Fonransr Type : Depilr : Ntdirrtd: *=; lntenral: WATER ENGRS I D: 3O34BO37EE 5. GEOLOGIC LOG : WATER LOCATED : REMARIG : Hde b to be #rdoned by di=t- fTEsr DATA : I I ctEck Bq lrrest TESING METHOO : AirCqrPresor l.AGts 25/26 sl.ticLcld: O t, DaCTnri/Egrrcd h.rtffngt-evt{ : Totil tL Dcrfumi,te.s€d Renrfis: 6D5EE 6/25195 Ptodtrfirt R& : Testlsgh: 0 sP.lt 2 hrg f r-tsalIE-l @NTRACTOR : Shehon Dretg Corp- itrne i-r l& iPleas€ Type or Wayne Shdlton / President Sigltaure Ptnrc : (97O) gz711e. 18&rO3 -----EAY-13-ge 16, 2? FROM : lICLAUGHL I N STATER ENGRS I D: 3o3quulj7bb Gti 1. WELL CONSTRUCNOil AND TEST REPORT ;TATE OF COLOFIADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER I reII PERTIT NTflBER 188404 ffisFtcErrsFoEY A'PROA,AL'GYiB1SI€ q,rrNarqg: KrrGtEnch lffirg Addess : 6336 $at Hury 13(t C&y. SL @: Carto;ale, Co..81@ Prsre (970) B38rS 3.V}ELL LACATIOITI AS ORILLED SE 114 NE ON,SIAiICES FROITI S€C. UtErS: ru fr. fon ftrtr SE Eraad SI.EDIVTSIOD{: SIREETADDRESS AT\A,B,I TOCATION : 111 Sec. 31 TrYp. 5S RaEe Egtfl 591 ft. tom East S€c. [ne. OR fOT BLOO( FlLg.lc(UNrD I @NDSFEEEIEVATIOII- - ERILUilc irlETHoD AirRotary DATE@uptErED trgrosrgs ToTALDEPTH qxt fr. oEPmcoMPLErb fL 5. GEOLOGIC LOG :5,[e.ED|AL.(h]FRCrl (frt TO({l} DcA0r Iype of nttEol(Sizp. Cobr. adT)De)9.0 0.o 30 (Els)Vdcarica, Flqfs 65 30 soo lSqX,lrarmn'Fqfltdin TFUIT$NG @ (ir)ffit-l lrbusiac Fgtr(A) | ToG) o o 0 0 ETTErelscresr Slot Size : '/\ATER I.CCATED : REMARI(S : Ftole b ro be ffined W dbt ItrtderH: Size: lderual: Type : Derfi : XlBil Aln, lt O!nq,liln/rl PlacdrEr iffiTE TESNNG Selb Ler Prnrpittg Remrts .a l!-.ElI r^ E-tlarrta COO{TRAC Mrftia,Aa iMETFIOID: AtConprcssor d: O t Dilerl.rr: LcuC : Totd fL Ddfurt il-trg-aGr=r-trr--).Et aaii- Ir. bEl-5-a r- t rtm ITOR : SlcbrDr5tgCorP- aa s Sr.rsritEl On SLPpErEotal Fotrlt iJierrc.l : 09,O8r95 Irlcangat : G/8/95 P6auaionFH: 0 gP.n TeC Lergih :2 hrs- ' Ptrno : (971C) !fiI11gz I ic I{o @Prttl V\Iaytre Shelbn / Preserent I S*r*urc I ! @nlxn MYERS SIZING TABLES LAYOUT SKETCH FRICTION CHART FOP PVC Solct Min.trxrm Asin Oe@r e thet 2rl2 tl. ol BasrnMr in Ga[o.rs = puflp Capsoty ir GpM. SCHEDULE 40 ptpE (Ftow Coefticienr C-l50) K3108 1/88 RECOMMENDED BASIN DIAMETERS GPT 'I E'24'w 35-48" 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 125 150 175 200 225 GALLONgFOOT OF BASIN DEPTH 13.25 23.5 36.8 a3 %.2 GALLONS IN 2%' OF BASIN DEPTH 33.1 58.8 92.0 132_5 235.5 AII CHARTS INCLUOE- 1 CHECX VALV€, I GATE VALVE E 5 ELAOWS 7 7 t/ 7 Y 11h" v velcrry'nFr,Sec. x, - r.*oEilffir,-affir Mrn GPM & Vekccrty per piFc Srze LOS AMIGOS RANCH DESIGN STANDARDS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS A. Purposes The purpose of the Design Standards is to establish advanced design practices which shall apply to the installation of onsite waste water treatment systems ("systems"). The purpose of the Management Plan is to provide effeclive management and operation of theSystems. The Management Plan provides a funding mechanism for inspections and routine maintenance of the Systems. lt also provided mechanisms to insure that necessary repair or replacement of the Systems is performed in a timely manner. The Management Plan is not intended to provide for common ownership of the Systems, nor to provide common funding for construction, repair or replacement of the Systems. B. ResponsibiliV For Desion Standads And Manaoement plan The Design Standards and Management Plan shatt be the responsibility of the Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association, lnc. (the "Association"). The Architectural Review Committee of the Association will be responsible for insuring that System cpnstruction conforms to the Design Standards. The Association shall retain a qualified operator to perform inspections and routine maintenance and to advise the Association when pumping, repair or replacement of a System is necessary. C. Funding The Association shall adjust it's Architectural Review fees as necessary to pay for implementation of the Design Standards in the initial construction of Systems. The Association will collect, as a yearly fee, sufficient funds to pay for the inspeciion and routine maintenance of Systems and administration of the Management Plan. The necessary pumping, repair or replacement of the Systems, as determined by the Association in its sole discretion shall be the obligation and financial responsibility of each individual homeowner. D. Desron Sfandards Systems shall conform to the following specifications wherever practically feasible. 1. Tanks - All septic tanks shall be sized for a minimum of four bedrooms. All tanks shall have effluent filters at the ouUet and provide for dosing of the absorption field. The top of tanks or risers shall be within 4 inches of the surface to allow pumping of all chambers. 2. Treatment - All Systems shall utilize Trickling Filters to lower BOD, suspended solids and nitrate levels. 3. Fields - All absorption fields shall be sized for a minimum of three bedrooms. Trench segments with at least 6 feet of separation shall be used whenever practically feasible. A minimum of three similarty sized hencfr segments should be installed with altemating values or a distribution box that allows isolation of each segment. Monitoring pipes shall be installed at the far end of each trench segment to allow inspection of field condition. lf a bed must be used a single dosed zone is acceptable. lf mounding is required to establish 4 feet of suitable soil, a single pressure dosed zone is acceptable. lf a bed or mound is used, a minimum of two monitoring pipes shall be installed at the far end of the bed or mound. E.. lnspections Routine inspections shall be performed bi-annually for two years following installation of a System. Thereafter, routine inspections shall be performed annually. Additional inspections shall be performed as deemed appropriate by the qualified operator. F ' lndividual Homeowners Responsibitities 1. Remit to the Association in a timely manner the yearly fee for G. the pumping fee as required, and any charges for enforcement action 2. Provide access to the System for purposes of inspection, routine mai enforcement action by the Association. 3. Provide 11x17 as-built drawing of the System showing lot num direction, scale and the location of the residence, driveway, sewer absorption fields and monitoring pipes. 4. 5. lnitially install and subsequenty repair or replace defective Systems, as in accordance with the Design Standards and applicable Garfield Complete necessary repairs or replacement of defective Systems, as de in it's sole discretion, within 30 days of written notice of a defective set forth in the notice. Associ ati o n Re s po n si bi I ities 1. Administer the implementation of the Design Standards and 2. Set yearty fees and determine pumping charges in a manner that Plan. 3. Retain the services of qualified personnel to perform inspections, the Association regarding necessary pumping and repairs or repl C c-vn FtalJ ) F R r"ett &.dp. Retain the services of a tank pumping company to perform neces Billindividualhomeowners as needed and issue notices of defective appropriate by the Association, in its sole discretion. 6. Retain records of all inspections, maintenance, pumping, repairs, actions. 0 Enforcement 1. The Association shall take the necessary aclion to collect sums that may include the imposition of late charges and/or interest overdue appropriate by the Association. 2. ln the event a homeowner fails to repair or replace a defective written notice, the Association shall have the authority to take any until the defective condition is repaired or replaced. Fine the responsible homeowner a sum not to exceed $1 Curtailwater service to the responsible homeowners Contract for the repair or replacement of the responsible homeorner, advance sums on behalf of the rate of 14o/o, and impose an administration fee not to ln the event the Garfield County necessary. Association fails to enforce these Design 4. 5. H. A. B. c. 3. shall have the right to take such action against Association as it deems and routine maintenance, taken by the Association. , pumping and any ', street address northerly from the residence, tank, by the Association, Health Codes. by the Association or such longer time of the Management Plan. funds the Management maintenance, and advise of individual Systems. pumping. as determined to be t, and enforcement over due and unpaid. This sums as determined to be in the time set forth in the all of the following actions condition on behalf of the homeowner at the $1000. and Management Plan, BEATTIE & CHADWICK ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELORS AT LAW 7IO COOPER AVENUE' SUITE 2OO GLENWOOD SPRING5, CO AI60l STEVEN M. BEATNE GLENN D. CHAOWICK TELEPHONE pm) 945{1659 FAXpm)gs-8671 KAREN J. SLOAT April 27, L998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department Garfield CountY Courthouse LO9 Eighth Street Glenwood SPrings, CO Re: Los Amigos Dear Mark: Enclosures pc: Robert H. SPuhIer Jerome F. Gamba Lawrence R. Green Lee Leavenworth Kevin Patrick SherrY Caloia John M. Kaufman 81601- Ranch Filing 6-l-0 on beha}f of Colorad'o Mountain College, I would. Iike to submit the attached letter as a written comment for the consideration of the County Commissioners in connection with the continuation f,o- a.igos nairch hearing, which I understand is scheduled for i:oo plrn. today, p1pri;--)t,. l-998. cMC does not plan to offer any live tLstimony at the hearing' Please let me know if you have any questions' Yours very tru1Y, Gttiirre.LD ixX,tnITY Chadwick APR 2 :,? 1998 BEATTIE & CHADWICK ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 7IO COOPER AVENUE' SUITE 2OO GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO AI60I 81 601- TELEPHONE pm) o1s.w9 FAX (970) g5-8671STEVEN M, BEATNE CLENN O.CHADWCK KABEN J, SLOAT April 27, 1998 Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County Garfj-eld CountY Courthouse l-09 Eighth Street Glenwood SPrings, Co Re: tos Amigos Ranch Filing 6-10 Honorable CountY Commissioners: As you know, this firm represents colorado Mountain college' cMC vice president Robert i.-siunrer and r appeared at the Aprir 13, 1998 County Cornmission"t="hearing regardlng los-Amigos Ranch Fi1ing 6-l-0. We expressed CMC's or"rill iupport of Los Amigos' "ppii""tion, but stitea that the College is concerned that a large numtrer of individual septic systems may negatively impact the quality of the Spring v;li;y-.qi,it"t, which iupplies domestic watei to crtc, Los Amigos Ranch, and others' At the time of the April 13, L998 hearing, w€ had just - - . received the April 10 , Lgga report by -John Xarliman of Mclaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd., and had not nla an opportunity to evaluate it,. since that time, wQ have had cMC's engineers Jerome Gamba & Associates, i;;.,-i".ri", the Mclaughrin report. Mr. Gamba concludes that the Mclaugniin ."poit is the more credible of the ;;;;;a; submitted to the County, and recommends in favor of centralized tertiary sewage trEatment. See attached letter' In addition, we have Engineer Robert B- Szrot of the prior rePorts and Based on the foregoing, approval of individual sePtic Filings 6-L0. read the rePort of Garfield CountY d;i;e aprir iz, 19e8, which reviewed arr recommends central sewage treatment' CMC resPectfullY oPPoses the r systems for Los Arnigos Ranch CMC believes it would be feasible to provide central sewage treatment for Los Amigos nanch Filings 6-1-0 through the spring - VaIIey sanitation Ois€rict, as was contemplated-in the District's origi-nal S".rri""- plin. Discussions are plesently underway with the spring valley sanitation-pistrict, lls amigo! Ranch, colorado Mountain coll;;;; Lii" springs Ranch, and regarding future tertiary treatient of sewage from the Spring Valley area' Board of county commissioners of Garfield county April 27, L998 Page 2 CMCwouldnotethatseveralotherdevelopmen!:areplannedor like1y to """"t-i" -Sprinq-Viif"V. ^ It is piobable that some of these developers wiII sLek -ippto.r.i -t"5 individuat septic =Vii"*=. Tha aofi"g" is conlLrned that if the County approves individual septic systems ior fif ings 5-l-O of Los Amigos ,Ranch-' it will come irnaer intense-fr"==rrr? !? approve the same for other developments. A proliferation-ot indiviitual septic systems would increase tne risk- or extent of injury to the spring valley Aguifer. We understand that the County has recently committed to participate in the development of a comprehensl-ve water Quality Management plan-[" *i"imiiE ammonia and nitrate contamination of ttre Roaring Fork. In light of this commitment, cMC-believes that centralized tertiary treatment is the only reasonable and prudent ilternative for thii area of the County' In conclusion, cMc opposes the use of individual septic systems for Los Anigos nanln Filings 6-l-0, but supports Los aiigo= Ranch's overall development plans' RespectfullY submitted, lenn D. ttorneY College MChadwick for Colorado Mountain pc: Robert H. SPuhler Jerome F. Gamba Lawrence R. Green Lee Leavenworth Kevin Patrick SherrY Caloia John M. Kaufman JEHOME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 113 gTH STREET, SUITE 214 PO. BOX 1458 GLENWOODSPRINGS,COLORADO 81602.1458 PHONE: (970) 945-2550 FAX: (970) 945-1410 Mr. Bob Spuhler Colorado Mountain College P. O. Box 1OOO1 Glenwood SPrings, Colorado 81602 Re: Report by John M. dated 1O APril 1998 Dear Mr. SPuhler: I have reviewed the rePort 21 April 1998 Kaufman on Los Amigos Ranch Potential lmpacts on Ground-Water prepared by John lvl. l(.drfrna", rucLaugtllin water Engineers, Ltd. dated 1o April 1998. The author of this report does a highly credible job of describing the geologic/hydrologic feature in eastern Garfield County ihat *e all know as the "spring Valley Aquifer". This aquifer is an excellent water supply source for the Spring Valley Campus of Colorado Mountain College as well as a number of individual homes and land developments' including Los Amigos Ranch. lt is a natural treasure, that if protected, will continue to provide Lxcellent duality water to the present and future residents of the Spring Valley area for ever. The effluent discharge from a large number of lsDS systems into this aquifer system has an extremely high potential for degrading the natural, very high water quality in the aquifer' While the degrad"iion proa"st *orld occur and intensify over time, as the ISDS systems were constructed and operated, the deleterious effect on the water quality would be irreversible. lf this aquiier system becomes polluted, the capitol and operating costs of treating the water to return it to drinking *ai"t quality will far exceed what the cost would have been for collecting and properly treating the sewage in the first place' Every effort should be made to convince the Garfield County Board of Commissioners that any waste water discharged to the aquifer, from this time forward, must first receive tertiary treatment so thai the discharged effluent can virtually meet drinking water standards. rtfully,2Jerome F. Gamba P.E. & L.S. 5933 .!, Requiremenrs for Consrruction of utitities within [ncline village Contenrs: I. The IVGID plan Check and Inspecrion process U. General Specificarions III. Building Sener Specificarions ry. Warer Service Line Specificarions V. Communal Utilit-v System Specificarions W. Joinr Trenchiag Specificarions Wt Compound Iltcter Specificarions WIL FIre System Specificatious Df. IVGID Regulatious for lrrigation Systems Appendix Inspecrion Requests Ersr z 1 5 7 9 l0 t0 t0 l0 u ntr: 9/1196cEr-t. tvGID Requiremenrs ro construct water and Sewer Sen.rce Lines I. L Before subminrng pians ro IVGID: A. Obtarn TX.P.q. sump, if aopricabie. B. Obtain Firc deparrmen! stamD, r,irvays required. If a fire s]-stem is requircci vou mu$ have documenrauon on size ano trre s1'stem piaa samped b;r rhe Fire Depanmenl Plan Subminai Requuemenrs: A. IVGID appiicadon rbr service mrsr be filed- iu Provide or\Tter narne and phone number. b' Provide agent name and phone number (if appiying for someone eise). If agenr isappiying on behaif of owner. iegal docum.nrauon or o*"n.r's ocsienation orasent isrequtreo. c' Provide conE:lcrcr name c.1ci ohone numirr alci fue svstem conuacror name :ld ohone number. if appiicable. d Prcvide excavadon conuzlcror name and phone number. e- All conuactot: are rcquired to register with IVGID for each properq'rhey are associared with pnorro rhe sarr of each projecr B. Thc applicant mu$ submir three complete ses of consmrcrion drawines. One ser of con$rucuon drawrngs wril be reurned by the Disrrcr- c- As a minirnum. rhe sire pian shail include rhe follo*ing informarion: L Water servicc iine shorvrng connecrion ro IVGID warer main. IVGID shail derermise sizc and locauon requred.b. Locarron or rt'arcr meter. wGID shail dererrarne sire and locauon requueci.c. Size :.oci wpc or rvarcr service line anci buriciing selver.d- Buiiding sewer showrng ciean-our locauons aao iocauon oiconnecllon ro Dismct sewer rine- Type and locauon of pressure rcducins value Firc service iine. if appropnate. showing connec:ion to tvclD rvarermain. Size and r.vpe or firc service line and loCauon and, t1'pe of backr'low Drevemlon cievice.All rrarcr and sewer intenor connecdons and use ooints Cross-connection conroi (All warer uses *rrhin rhe junsdicrion oiiVGID are subjecr to backt-lorv proreclron riom cross-conneclions per ivGID orcjinance 4. An:cie lj.) Locauon anci access of baciovater vaive if requrred,- 3. MID Approval and Renrn of Stamoed plans A. Allow ar least 48 hours for TVGID to compiere r.he pian check. aad at times longer. dcpenciing upon cucumsances rhar prcvaii wrth tb,e proper-v. B. Alt prciiminarv ttes caicuiared &om rhe Ptaa Check must be paid priorto IVGID approvai stsEp- These r-ees arc subject to change shouid preiiru::rar.v fies nor rnarch finaiconsuuction- Final fee dercrmmarion shail be baseci ou as-buiit insuilations at t-tnal inspecdon. lncltr Villrgc Gcrrrf lnrprwtrrran Ois;rricr Utilticr lnrprm r TOfl t33-l t09 ) f. g- tL i. ?Gr.glarr6 IVGID Requiremeots to Construct water and sewer service Lines C' If a water or:!wer np is reouired the excavauon contntcior is requireci to aopil' rbr a uopermit wrth IVGID uuiiries nvo rveeks pnor ro e.xcavadon. ir is rhe conu:rctor s responsibiliqv to scheduie his rvork wrrh IVGID for coordinauon at leasr one r'eek pnor rothe sun of work. -1. Consrruction phase A. Tap reques! procedure: a- Tap mnsr be paid for anci invoice number rssued. b. Iap requesr to be tjlled, our by e.xcava[or. c- Excavator mnsr schedure. and be prcsent for, usA line rocarion. d' Excavator must cail Utilities Pipeiine. 832- l2l l. .18 hours prior to rip reoue$ darc. rocontirm ap dare and time- Excavaror musr be presenl ar rime of tap. e' Excavator must cail Urilities Office. 832-1209. ro scheciuie inspecrion. -18 hor.rs pnor roup and sening ot service iines and meter. L water and sewer taos made to Disu:ct mains are requreci to conform to comrnunal sysrem sandaros which require an ''A" licensed conu:lctor to insall an;r prping rhar shall be accepted as Disrnct propert.v. B' All locarion requesrs must be cailed through u.sA. l-g00-2:7-2600. All persons requesung line locariors must field *..t *ith IVGID personnel or no line iocation will begrven. 5. Preliminary lnspections A' A warcr mercr musr be irsulled prior to a prcliminar,v rvarcr irupecrion requesr. one week noticc for merer insailarion and iubscquent irspecdon is required. B' All otherrequiremens must be compieted prior to prciimirury irupecrion requeslMinimum 48 hou nouce rs requred for ail inspe.rionr. C' '{ maD of as-built utrlities must be completed pnor ro preiiminar.v inspecrions of warer urd sewer iines (or pnor to r-rnai inspecuon tbr remodels). The rbllowing is required: a-. provide sirc plan. b' Properqv lines abuning fVclD-owned properr.v require lot line survey. A copy of the suryey shail be given ro IVGID. c' Accurate rianguiated measuremens to all sewer clean outs. \\'ater boxes and vaives. a Washoe Counry Buiidin_s permit on-sire. D' All re-inspections are subjecr to a re-inspecrion fee in 3sssyr{:nce rvirh the UpC. E AU fue systetEi are requircd, to have fvGID approved bacidlow prcvenrion (cail for deails) wirich must be rested prior ro finai inspecuon. E' All boiler s:/stems are required to have IVGID approved bacicflow prcvenrion (cail for daails) which must be resed. prior to finai inspecrion. 6. Finai Inspeoion A- At requcst for final inspecrion all boxes are required to be in piace aad visible ro thcinspecor. Fire s1'stems are reouired ro be in piace and approved. All fixnrres to be set. Inclirc Villq: Gcrrrl lmpmrcnrrrr OirricrUtiliic. lrupc.ro.r ( 702) tJ2-l :09 R .9/ar96l IVGID Requiremess ro consrnrct warer and sewer seryice Lines fuiy server pump sutions tested anci approved. .{ll backrlorv prevenuon devrces resteri anriapproved- All backrr.'aGr v3jv65 properiy placed and aoproved- Compiiance rvith ailIVGID buriding resuuemenrs anci ordina*es. All frnai rees arc due arthis time. Washoe Connr.v Buiiding permrt on-site. B' tvGID reserves the r.ight to impiemenr a resricled cenifrcare of occupancy thror.gh washoe corurr.v or ret'oke inspecrion oiany nailre due ro rmpropneries. IL Generalsneeificarions These requlrEmenB are appiicabie '*rrhin rhe jurisdiction of rhe inciine Village CeneralImprovement Disnct (The Disnct) for tre uuitding of seu,er and r*arcr sewice lines tom rhepropenv or eascment line to the house or building and within existing right-of-.*av (ROm. Sewice lines on privarc proPettv shall be consmrcted and mainrained b:r rhe properr.v onner inaccordance wirh these requircments. Codsr: Buiiding S':wc! and *ater service iines shail be consrnrcreci in accordance with rhe i:resredition or: Uniform Ptumbing Cgdc as prepared, by the Internarionai Associarion of Plumbing and Mechanrcal ofiiciais. except for parricular requirements in excess ofrhe Codes. as sared hercrn. aud Shoqd Specifications for hrblic works Consmrcdon sponsored, aad disribured by Washoe C.onnt.v, et aL Annlieanons: fui appiication rbr uulitv sewice connection must be r'iled rvith the Disarct and all c-onneoion fees pard betbrc the Distncirvill irspecr ser?rce lines or insrall warcr merers. TheWashoe Counw Buiiding Depanment requires ividence ::rat the Disrrict has examined the plansprior to burlding permir issuance. Watcr aud server raps require schcduling ar least seven (7) days inadvancc. Line locauons m,st be condrmeci prior to any excavarions Flr! Marshal Rcview: The Disrict does not review a projecr to derermiae rhe need for rire 1p!4tt iines. Tle appiicant :s a"qvised, to conac! rhe Nonh i.-ake r.rhoe r-irc prrrccuon Disucr NLTFPD) at 831{351 to detcrurine the avaiiabiiiry of adcquarc :'irc protcction and the porenual need oia rire spnr*ler system. .\ sprir*Ier ryrt.r. if rcquued- wril regurre a sepantre servrce line tapped to tie Disnc6 warcr Eaio- The poable warcr sewice line cannot be used for tre sewice. The NLTF?D wril make avaiiable rheir iFir" Pr.r.nrion Bureau stardard operation Proceciure'' upon requcsr Ther rbrmai revierv of the pians wiil occu beforc rhe Disrrcr revierv. Insnecrion: No backfilling shail be pertbrmed until the Disnct has irspected. tested and aoproved the insullation for coverins. The Dismct shail be notified at least tbrtv+ight (48) hours pnor roinspeoion' All tesrng shait be perrbrmeci in rhe presence of an aurhorized represenauve of theDisuicr Rcinsneerion: If not rcad:/ for scheduied inspection piease cail 832-1209 for cancellation. A feewill be charged in accordance with ue [-IPC lor re irspecrion if rhe sire is not ready for irspecrion, or if the inrdai inspection fails- UtllitY conncetionr: All watcr senrice aad building sewer connecdoru shall comply with one of thc foilowrng condidons, whichever is appiicable: Slnole Frnilv Rcrid.n..' wherc a singte family rcsidcnce is constucte d on a singte parcel. direct comecuon to the public waEr and sewei s-vsrcrn shall be made. Shouid tl-: parcei not torder upon. tnclin Vi lh4: ljcurl lmprovcron OisrcrUdltic. lrupccnor r 701) t32-l 209 Rllr.gnn6 * IVGID Requirements to Constmct water and Sewer Service Lines the easement or dedicareo right-or'-way containrng the pubiic utiiiries. rr is rhe propem.o$nefsresponsibiliry to ob ^in the nicessan' i"r..."o anc[/or consrrucr marn enensions as determined robe necessa{v by the Disricr. n.i*-o'ursem.nr :br maln exrensions is provided shouid aciditionaiconnecdons be made to rhe e-rtendea ma'r wirhin a ren !.ear penod in accordance with the sundard : .{ development wirh more than one ::::::'*:iiding *,i,io**onlIlo*Trership shail be served bv communai \\arcr and se! !'iu' Ler.rrrs. ra!o, or*Trersfup shail be served bv communai \\arcr and se*,er :*tS ,3t o:"'-oPmenl shail be metercd near the point rvherc the service iine crosses thcrvherc the service iine crosses the t1; ;il. f ;i' x,'.;: il:Iilo,oresewes tha riohr rn H-,^-ffi ffi'"t*t:?f::.j"::::_TFn.;;;;;;#;#H::1?1ffi ."tr;:lf ::;::?:::1itfl ";."::,"ffffi Lofthg owner(s) of the.FAn-n, aa-.^r ^- --^til:n;:ilHs)orthedp.,!,';;;;Jr;h:X;,ffi Iffi [l.-l.,:i:1il'"hil''-:i:1T,',,:*[urd grounds. Iil. Materials: Acceprable pipe materiai, T..T, iron soil pipe. poiwinyl chloride pipe sDR 35. orasbestos cement sewer prpl chss z+oo, a]l of w-hich shall conrorm ro rhe specificauons set fonh inthe uniform Ph:'bing boa.. ioln" ti"il u. or rhe sarne marerial as the pipe using internal rubberor plastic gaskes' or:rn exteEull rubber slceve using stainless steel bands. all as manufacnrred ffiYff use with parricular tvd;f;i;.- Solvenr-werd joinrs and ABS pipe shau nor be whcre different pipe mareriais are joinred rhe joinr shail be made by rhe nse of an approvedmechanical coupiing specifically ,n-rti..*.d for use with thc differenr pipes to be joined- Thcsecouplings shall be similar *d .q;l;Eauider couplings *a ,ut be approved by the Districr Asbestos cement t*t-liP" and./or poilarinyi chloride pipe shall not be used wherc rhe cover is lessthan thirry-six inches t3i") o, g*ir" J* eighry-six -.h., (E6"). ca$ 'on soii pipe may be ,sedwhen eighteen inches ( l8') of-cov., is rv.i.ule- For shallower deprhs. concrcre encasemenr orother speciai means approved by rhe Distncr mr:sr be r:seo to pmrec! rhe pipe. F;tt* of four rnch asbestos cement pipe between coupiings shall nor exceed six feeq six inches size: Building sewer shall be a minimum diamerer of four rnches for srneie famiiv residences.Buiiding seweE tbr apanmens, motels. and commerciai estabrishrnents Jir"tt u. sizea in accordance11 ft-" *quiremenrs of the unifon piu*t i,rg code and shajr be tbr.r inches minimum size- Thcsr?e se'urcr rcquired for serving morc rhan one parcel or unit shail be six inches minimum and publicutilir.v easemen* shail be p.r-ia.a rr rlquired by the Disrrcr Sanaradon: Il1 accordance with |'fsvarla Adrrinisuarive code oIAq 445. buiiding selvers shall beplaced a minimum of l2'0 in.t.t-u.iJrrrg urrtisnr'led warcr line shelf and wirh a minimun of35'0 inchcs of horizontal separauon oo- ro,., iine when in rhe sane rench. *Il!gP: The grade of horizontai drainage piping shail be no tess rhaa onenr:aner inch per:::-ar t-t's per Section 407, uniform ptrrwr[1ing code. The pipe shail be laid at a tnre andrrtrrtoll! grade' Therc shail be no change in grade or aiignment of rhe pipe which is unnccessar.v toa pFoper installuion'-dt:IT "pp-ti.a by tbe Disrricr changes in direcrion of flow shail be inaccordance with secuon 405, uniHrm Plumbing code- All work shall be done in a workmznlike Rn gtU$ 5 Inclir- Villeg: Ccrrclrl tnrprcverrlm OisolcrUtiliri-r tnsPeo.r (702) E32-1209 IVGID Requiremeurs to consrnrct water aud sewer sen'ice Liues manner and shail sa,sn'rhe requ*errenrs of a qualin' insailauon. Tesdng: Insallation musl Pass $1g 5t:n6i3;ci four porurci per square inch (* psi) for rirteen (15)mmurc prcssue tesl. Conractor is rcsponsible to submir As-Buiir piurs to fvGID upon compietion of rvork. The Conuactor shail provide ail labor. toois. and equipmenr necessar]. to perrbrm the required ress.Any tauiry equipment shail be rcpiaced berbrc -, i.ri is accegred. The Contracror shail suppiy a presnrre gage rhar can be read in incrcmens or between one and fivepsi, in accordance with the Uniform etnnoing Code tUpC). Bcddine Matcrial rscd forthe pipe zone shall be a Class A bacMill as srared in Secrion 200,Aggrcgate' ofthe Standard Specifi.rdsns for Public Works Consrucrion for Wastroe Cognr.v, 1992. EackfiIl: All backfill shail meer the requirements of Class E backfill as srareci in Sccuon 200,Aggregarc- of&e Standard Specificauons t-6r Public works Constnrcrion rbr s/aslroe Count.v, 1992.with no rock larger than I inches. [f nauve marenal does nor meer rhe requrremenm backfill mceung the requiremenrs siraii be tmporreci. iae beoding shall be a mrsrmurs oeDr,n or slx rnchesbelow rhe pipe- Betbrc testine, Ihe server prpe shail be beodcdthree;;;;;;ri. rr", to dre rcpof the pipe with simiiar matenal. The bonom wrdth of mncL measured ar rhe rop or rhe pipe. shallnot excced thl width allowed forvarious srengrhs of pipe ar may be specified, eliervhere inrhcse fcchnicai Specifications or an recomme:rded b;r rtre pipe manufacrurer and must meer ANSIStandards- Aftcrresdng aad inspection the mnch rir"it be bacldilled with bedding matcriai aadhrd.tanPed to a depth tweive inches above rhe top of rhe pipe prior ro back fiIti"i rhe rcsr of rhetreuch. 9can outs: A clcan out shall be provided by rhe propcrty owner where rhe building sewer crDsses the propery or easemenr line aai rvithia three feet tj) oirsiae of rhe foundation- All cleau outrcquiremesE shait be in accordance with Secriors 406 aad I107, Uniform plurnbing Code. AII clcan ous shail be tnsalled ar intervals nor to exceed eighr.v feer (80'), or a change of direcuon offorty-five (45) degrees or morcr or au aggregare rhcreoi au cleaa ours shail be iru ro grada plugged- and have a concttte box rvith *irrt lid marked server. Ptugs shall be rwo piece e.rpansiontypc sim:iar to ETCO. T'cone stoDper or equivalenr Properw otor.rs shail be responsrble ror kceprng cleaa out box rom berng Urrnoi or damaged- Rrckweter valves: Instailauon of baclcwacr or check valves on lots with fixilres lower than the nc|c up$ream manirole. as morc specifrcaily explaineri in rhe Uniform Plumoing Code. shail beeaforced Erildi[gSewer Constnrcdon: wherc building sewcr mainline connecrions have not be provided by the Distnct to the properry for eascment line and/or rhe propenies werc nor i(sessed for rhc buildin-c sewcr insallation, the properlv owner shail e"sume the cost of providing rhe requiredright-of-wav. The owner shall be responsible for s[Finurg the necessar.v washoe Counr.v sreet curpcrmta aud also coordinauou wirh other uulitv agencies foi teir utiliry iocations. The propenyosner rcquening the tap wiil be responsible for cuting pavement a1d lxssyadng rhe mnch to PrcPer deph and grade. The Disrict rviil tap rhe maln. Owner is responsible foi layrng building sswer with aii requircd appunenances. Coanection to the existing sewer rnain sball be thmugb the ue of an approved double srrap saddlefc trausirc, plastic' .*t iroru or cotrcrEle rnains. For vimous clay mai+ a sectioa m,st bi rcmovedand aurye iasatled wrth Cauider coupiers. The pipe grade must 6e wo perEeil (2%) 0/a' pqfot) or grcarr- Ditching o! lrgaehing rilrsr meer osHA surrdards. lnclb Villqa rlcrl lnrooncnun Oilrn tUrirFi-. lrup.-no r 7021 t32-1 209 R.?.9/aJ96 6 IVGID Requiremenrs to coustnrct water and sewer service Lines where the properq' is too low to be served by -eravrw to an e.xisring se\l'er line. rhe propem.ownershail insrall an individuai pump surion as approveci by the Disrncr. ihe owner may rnsall thepEssure buriding saver rv'irh his own contractor or empioyees. Hor*'e'er, rhe Disrrcr rvril approve TtTnlit and inspect and approve the consrrucil. .iil ;Gp ,o,ions ,*ril discharqe rnro amanhoie rrnig5s orher*rse splcified by rhe Disurcr- unless prcviorsly acceptedin wriring bv ivGID, prcssurized pipe rom individrul sewerpumps,dons shall be Ringfite Class 200 ir.ng-..r.ci size accepable ro the Disrncr and nor less rhan2" diameter' Solvent *elded joins or anges shall nor ue r:seo- Above piping musr meer AsrMStandad DZ24l. Pressurized sewer oipe shail be hydrosaticaily tesreci and meer \rarer pipe rest specificarrorslrstatlation standard shail be by ;;;n*rs specificarions and shall meer all IVGID irsrallationrequirements conact rvGID for conformance standards and specificarion for indivich,et sewer pump surions. IV. Materials: warcr senrice lines shall be r.vpe K copper nrbing or ducrrle imn pipe. all of which shallconform to the Uniform Ptumbing Code and appiicable auffia srandards. polyerh;rlene tpE)rylrbuvl !PB),or type L or M coiper pipe shail nor be permined- pvc c-9oo is aitorvable forseryiccs 4-inch and larger ptovidcd no'giued joinr are ,sed- If copper is nsed, service lines rwoinches in dianeter andimailer shall biiype K copper conforming ro AsrM B-gg. A one-inc5service shail be suitable for 32 9Pm: I7r-inch senrice suirhle for 70 gpm: and 2-inch service Jltable. for 140 gprn- c,stomeiservice valve boxes must be c?rrisr.v G-5 or equivalent concrErebox wrth steei lid marked waEr- Line sizes arc to be cornnrensurate *ith heaith standards to en:rure $at not stagnail }v'ucr rviil accumuiate. only siiver rype solder rviil be ailowed. AII soldercd orbrazed joins must be in accordance *itl uPc insrallation srandards for copper plumbing. soldcrspools shall be available for inspecdon. All service line fiF,ngs strall be flared mechanicai 191tplssion$?e or soldercd with non-ieari wc "ppr1-".Gider. FROM MAIN LBIE ToMETEL ONLY FI-ARED oR T'TECTIANICAL JOTNTS wrLL BE .{rLowED. Curir Stons: Curb stops- for copper service lines shall have AW.WA thrcad iniets and comorcssionconnection ourles' aad shail be Ford bail vaive or oriseal 2 or equivaienr curb srops shail beirtalled to the front and rear of meter seners. rvith a-o appropriate valve key and capped enclosure;we$c pons shall not be ailowed. rr - - r----- Installation: where new connectiors are made to an rvGrD w?ter main. the prope,T.v ownerrequesting the ap w'iit be responsible for obnrning wasiroe counry r:se permis and for cuaingPavement and excavating the.trench to proper deprh and grade. The Districr rvill tap rhe main up to Y:Tht" Larger taps. 1rc the responsibilir.v of the proper.v owner:. wGID wrll provrdetnstnrctions on the specifics or location and merhods-forthe'rap. pmpcrtv owner is to iay rhe pipeto the properry line' install c,rb stop up*.ri J,h. ;;;b; set the mercr yoke, boxles), layservice line on privarc Propeqv and install curb stop one to three feet d,ownstream of the mercr boxwith appropriarc valve te;, atra.upp"J*.rosurc. For existing serviccs, the Districr rvril set themglg3wirhin one week, of crstomer reque$ if owner has obtained buiiding permit, paid fees, andisstailed thc proper curb stop *tt ".."r-*ries. The District r*iil inspect aad approve thecon$rucrion beforc bacrdi[ing. Alr trenching musr meet osEA sr^,rdards. Warr must be requesred seven days in advance with fees paid- ln^clir: Vilhgc Gcranr lmorw=nrenr Dinrrcruutli.r InrurrDG I 702) t32-l:09 Rlg,.glllt6 7 IVGID Requiremeur to Coustnrct Water and Sewer Senrce Lines BcddinE \larcriai useri for rhe prpe zone shall be a Class .{ backfill as snreci in Secrron 100. Aggregare. of the Standard Specriicauons for Pubiic Works Consrnrcrron ror Wasnoe Counry, 1992. The bonom of rench shail be levei anri smoodr- aad excavared as needed to mamarn a mrnimum of 6-inches of bedding belorv the gracie req.uired by rhe undersrcie or rhe prpe barrcr. Backfill: All backfill shall meer the reouiremenrs of Class E backfill as stared in Secrion 200. Aggregate. of the Stanclari Specrr'icaions ror Public Works Consrucdon for Washoe Counry. 1992, with no rock larger than 3 inches. If ruuve marcriai does not mee! rhe requiremens. backfill meeting the rcquircmens shail be imponed. Afrer resdng and inspecrion. rhe rench sirail be bacicfilled with bedding material and hand rampeci to a dcprh of nveive inches above the top of the pipe prior to backfilling the rest of the rench. Minimum ailow'able cover for \\ater service iines is thirry-six inches (36"). Scnaration: [n accordance with NAC .145. warcr lines shall be placed ar a minimum deoth of 36 inches aad ou an unciisnrbed sheif. Scwer lines shail be ar least l2 incnes bciow rhe saner iine. Therc shall be a minimum of 36 inches separanion berween warcr aad sewer lines. MgSff: Upon payment bv the owner. meres are irmrshed and insralleci b1'rhe Disu:cr- \Vherc approved meler boxes anri voke nave been provrciecl propert.v owneni may hoox uo ro the meler sener pnor to rhc Disucrs senng rhe merer. Temnorarv Meter Sets: A temporary meter may be set for no longer than one six-month period- Meter settcr:: Mctcr setres are required and. for l-inch through Z-inch services. sirail be V-70 Senes Copperseaer as manufactured by Ford Metcr Box Conrpanlr, lac- or Mueller Company model H-14054. Mcter senes shall be all copper or btonze, minimun height of l8 inches. and equipped with a serrice stop with padlock wings. Meter ho.es: Meter boxes for l-inch sen ices shall have mercr boxes similar or equal to N-I6 a.ud include coves with merer rcader lids. Cover shall be markcd "Watcr.'' Meter boxes rbr I %-inch aad 2-inch senices shall have mercr boxes si'niiar or equivaienr to Chd$y Concge Products model 8-36. ard shall inciude coveni wirh mercr readcr iids Cover shail be marked "'W'8tcr.'' Mcter boxes mu:rt be irsuiled pnor ro requesring a Elercr. Meter insailarions shall be marie a! Lhe prooerry iine. Tenninp Saddler ard S.rvi...lrmrt' Tapprng saridles rbr servrces shail be oucuie ron wrth wo gaivanized stcei suaps. Saddles sirall be suruble rbr 250 psi scwice. Senrice clamps for 2-inch and smaller serwice connestions shall be maileable iron. tapped for iron pipe. with double stnrps to suir pipe ouside diameter. and shail be simiiar or equal to Rockn'ell 313 Double Strap. The ourles or ail service saddles rbr 2-inch asd smailer shail requrrc corporadon stops of the sasre size as the netv sewice line. Insulatinp Rushinsc. Counlinss or Dleleetrie Unions: .{pproved insuiating br.rshings, couoiings or dielectng rrnisl5 shail be provided by rhe propctr-v owner at the connecdon to the meler, excePt wherc the District's and owneis sewice line are both copper pipe. Crthodic Protection: Installation of cartrodic prorecrion is rcquired for ail warcr serwices. .{ 5- pound "high potcntial" magnesium anode packaged in chemical backfill wrth l0 feet of #l2lead wirc sh-ll be used- The asodc shall be buried at a rdaiuum depth of 48 inches. A b'ronze or btzss clamp shell !g used to attach thc lead wire ro the meter yoke. The atode mut be a minimr:n of 35 inctres from the metcr yokc, sewicc line or warer maiu- If a locating rvirc is instatled on the \larsr scrrrice linc, cathodic protectron shall be in$alled 3 rninimrrrn of once cvery 500 feet and at each iuetsection ia thrt lias. tnc{irr Vi llrlr GcrEtt lnrororcnrnr Dirncr, Utilbhr inrp-nrqr 1 7Ol) t32-l 209 R.v'-91u96t t IVGID Requirements to consrnrct water and sewer service Lines ffi;.]l.i]::licelocatIons.propem'oltTlersarerequiredtorurnishindit'idrraI I:::'':#;j[ij,:'x''j?i:1]:,;i::iffiT'[X,l]'.11;'.";:;jjff :riT:t:;";lqsr Lne no[se.TcsfinE: The conracror shall provide ail labor. roors. and eouipment necessary to pertbrm rherequired rcsts- tuiv taulqv .quii-.nirrr"il u.,.pr"..;;;#;1r test is accepred.After the meter is sel the lrater will be urned on and rhe iine tested for leakage and properuuailation' The service tine sirJl i. ..pir.a ar dris ,i,n. *a Jt uiriut. teats siratt be repa*ed.once approved' the \'€'ter sen'ice line mav be backfillea- wL-, lines shall u. ,.uJy ro, resting andvaive ke:r provided ror.,ot ,io;: ffi;;;ting for irupecrion. conractor is responsibte ro submir As-Buiit prans ro rvGID upon comprerion of work. v. The design and consrrucrion or communai uulir.v sr.stems rbr condomrniums and multipierestdenuai buridinss shail be t ".;;;;;e ',,.rh the Desrgn and consu,cnon standards. rhestandard Specifica-uons anci Denris of the Disarc!. ano compiy *nrh ail District ordinances. *iiillr?Htit;T"Hl to compiv wirh cenain ponions ofthe District's Generai Requiremens for l' Ttne (3) complete ses of plans and.specificaulns, prop_erly certified by a a regisreredprofessional tngTtt* ,irriiti rJmined ,o ,t oi#.i Fagineer for fraai revierv for thcurility rystcrn- . iraa:, po;";;;;. plrs after being chccked are rcquired to be rc-drawnorrechecked- rhe eppiicant ri,uit p"y the additionuiior, of checking based upon the acualexpcnse of therechecking services. Thrce t:l ,.rr oiisubminals will be requircd forcorrecdons aad add'itio*l p.",,t"il be due r "a"-". of the pran checks and/onechecks.one sumped ser or piaas *iii urr.rroed by the Distncrz' The District shail inspect the consrucdon of the warcr aad sewer faciiities ro endeavor todetermrne rvherher tl" *ott ir;;g done rn suustanuJ accordance wirh rhe approvedplans and soecifrcauont' '+ir.*, iorry<i-shr (.t8) hous nouce shail be given ro *re Distnctpnor to consEuctron of the warcr aad sewer facriities. 'IrvsLs r,'ur oe grven 3' The Disrict shall be norified forry'eight (a8) ho.rs in advance of any utilitv sy$em rers orinspections' TLe Disnc, th"Ii;Le rhe owner s50 for aay failed re$ or rnspecnon whichrenlits in an addirional visit U.u "Eir,.,.r empio;ree.4' Ifthe work does not meet Dismct standards ar any rime d,ring consrrucdon as determinedbv the Disrr" r:-T:.'- ";;;;;;;;'*;;.H ;ff., wiu be notified and instru*ed tocorrcct such deticiencles. At the compietion or-,._o]:*"tion, rhe properv own€.r shafl prepare Record Drawings byrwising rhe approved' consmrction pirJr-io rerrect clranges made dudng consrucrion.ucluding distance to samury uurtaing;ewer from downsream rnanhore and roca'ons ofvalves' meErs' ciean ouE. eievauon o-imanhole inverts and rims aad clean ou*. e!c. Aclcarrcprociucible set of the n."orJo."rLgs shall be submined to the Disrict withappropriate cemfr carion by a r.s*i*llrofessionai engineer. Thc Disrrct may termiaate water and./or sewer servrce if owner faiis to meet the Districtcoosmrcuon sandards. or provide.._A.O Recorri Drawrngs. 5. R.t gllfri I fffil;lffi;ffiDis.cr IVGID Requirements to Constmct Water and Sewer Servrce Lines W. ,Ioint Trenchinp Snecificanons Joint trenching of utiliry service lines is allowed: however. jr.nsciictionai sundarcis must be mer wrthin rhe public right-of-way and Disrnct easemenrs. The \\.arer service shall be insaileci a minirnum of one foot above and three r'eet honzonally away ilom rhe buiiding sewer on r.ndisrurbed soii. Water mains consrrucred within rhe public ngbt-oiwav and Distnct easemenE shall be insuiled nveive inches (12") mrnimum above the server main and a minimum of ten r'eet honzonully away from the sewer where possrbie. Joint trenching is not ailoweri rvith the Distnct matn systems. No other urilities shall be insailed rrnthin utree :'eer honzonallv oithe Disrnct main lines and/or within one foot from service buiiding sewers. VII. Comoound !\leter Snecifiearions Meten *ree inches and larger must be insailed per curenr Disncr requlremens. Please conucl Utilities department ar 832- 1209 for more inrbrmadon. WII. Fire Svstem Soeeificarions The North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection Disrnct wiil derermine rhe size of connecuon required for f,trc seruice and adequacy of s;rstem for tire protection. Firc service taDs will be made using the same nurterials and methods as stated hercin tbr service Eps. Backflow prevendon devices will be required to isolate the firc protecdon system from rhe Dissrct rxater suppiy. If the customer desires to have a combination tap serving both the fre systcm and the domesdc sysrcr& the service line fr,om the main to the fire senrice tee musr be sized to properiy t'low both the fire flow and domesric flow, as approved by tlc Disrrict. All fire sprinkler s-vstems must be separared &om rhe Disurct \Ercn system with an approved backflow prevendon device. Systems wirh giycot. asti-freeze- or other chemical additive mrst be separaed with a reduced pressure device. I{ersey FRP U, Febco Model 825Y or 825YD, or Wans Senes 909. Sonnkie-r systems wrthout giycoi. anti-&eeze. or chemrcal acididves musr be seoarated from the Disncr waer system with a double check vaive assembly, Hersey FDC, Febco Modei 805 Senes. Watts 709 Senes or eqttel. Backflow devices must be installed under the residence in frost free. accessible area- with pmvisions tbr valve drainage and marntenance. IK IVGID Regulations for lrriqarion Svstems All irrigatiorvsprinkler svstems must have backllow protecrion in accordance *'ith the UPC. Stop and waste vaives ate not allowed, positive cirain on-ofrs are required- lnigatiorusprinkler systenui not tied to rhe domesdc rvarcr iine require a separarc meter to be applied for atthe wGID Utilities otAce. An inspection of cormecrioru to the domestic warer line is rcquired, please cail the Utilities office ar 832-1203 to schedule an appoinunenr On-sire inspection prior to irutallation is suggested to assure compiiance with Utility rcguiations. lnelim Villegc Gerurl lmprovcnrcm Disrict Utiliricr lrupctaor ( 702) t32-l :,09 Rd.g/t/!Xi to IVGID Requiremen* to Constnrct warer and Sewer sen ice Lines .{ppendi.r Insnecrion Reouests Inspecrion requess may be marie by phone or rn person. ^ ffitill,H,insPecrions shall be penbrmed to veni'rhe rbllor.rrng as appticabte. including l. Warer and server iine insuilarions resred and approved. Z. Tap of main line l. Mcter ser +. Customer semice valve irsrailation 5' Backflow device insralladon lfor im sysrens. boiler sy$ems. or an:/ de'ice orinsrailarion rcquiring cross{onnecdon conuor) teneci and approved6- Back-warcr valves installed anci approved 7. Server pumD sr-dons tesrcd and aoproved t. Fre66gn6 dedicared 9. As-built drawingls) verificauon I 0. pressure regularorls) insailed B' Frnal Inspeaiors shall be performcd follorving satisfacrory cornplerion of all appiicableinspecdons as descnbed d A;;;r.. Additionally: All prcliminarl, rnspecrioru must be complete. All sewer anci rvater boxes must be insalled and visible rbr inspecrion ar rhis ume. All fr-mues musr be ser A fnai {lxn:rc uut cotull rviil be cione anci anv aciditionar fees ciue ro charees iom:nidar oia's cnecKeo snari be "ra.- - qgg..rerrdrr -s=r Lrutr ro cn c' comrnrrnai systen:s have gdd'itional requiremenc. conracr lvcID for specriicauons. ::ff.:iff"tl any questions to A-m Johnson. utiliries Inspecrion. 832- 1209. Thanx 1.ou for your Rr.9/ar96 lt lffiIffiffioii,Er l. Tap Request procedure (mav oe requireo :br: incresse tn meler slze- =e!es anci bor.urcis o:rceis connecting Io oua uuiities. imgatron meters. ijre svsrerns. or server raos. :br examoie) Meter or server fees must be paid onor to issuance of rao pe::nit- work order issuance. r,nd rvorKscheduling- Iaos must be sei:eduied one "veek in advanci. R.cscheduiing or raps rs aiso subjecr toone week's nouce. Excavaror mrrst scheciuie and be present rbr usA line locarion. (g00) J27-2600 Excavator mnst finisir compiering rhe up permit and bring rhe up permiy'request :brm inro TVGIDUtilities'office to set the rap schidule. tn.tua.license "id phon. numbers on rhe rorm. Excavator mtrst call 832- 1209 to scheriule an inspecrion at leasr rwo working cia:rs pnor rocompiedon or: tre up, setting of service lines and meEr. aad laying of sewer iines-on thc second working day pnor to the scheciuied rap, rhis aoooinrment musr be conr'irmed. We encourase the excavator to do this by cailing 832- 1209. However. if we do nor hear. rve srll makethe cail to coniirm- [f r,rc are unableto confirm rhe ap schedule ar leasr one dalr pnor ro rhe ap, itmay be canceilcd to coruietve the time of onr crcw members. Excavaror mst be presenr at ?he time of the rap. Forwarcraps uP to 2-, the owner is responsibie for: alt pipe. fittings, mercr1.okes. boxes. and excavadon. wGID unil: suppiy the upping saddle and corporarroncocic. perrorm ure up, urdsupply a mercr. For wars3 taps larger d:an :-. 'Jre crooerr.v owner is responsible rbr iive rapping to the mauu rmlessot:yt" approveci by IVGID. This'rap ihail conrbrm ro TVGID sanoar&'aud specriicauons tbrpublic and privatc commusal wartr *d r.*., instailations. fVGID supplies only rhe mercr. for +" sev/er raPs. rhe owner is responsrble rbr all pipe. fiaings, ard ex&ation. rVGID wril suppiythc tapping saddle and pertbrm rhe up. All other sewer work shall conform rc the sundards and specificarions for public and privarc communal watcr urd selver installation and is the responsitttity ofrhe propett). owner. The excavator shall hold a Nevada Class A liccnse. l- 3. .t. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I t. t.lti=ra^g MID euick Llst :.., It rs your rcsponsrbrlrty us owncr or ugtinl t() scc tllat the pcrson instulting wntcr irnd sewcr tincs obtrinr thcittformution on your starnped .ppro".,l ser ol'plonr ro aol.tpr.,i his job ro lvGlD speeiflcations. WARNING! Failure to read. adhere to and properly disrributc marerialattschcd ro your plans may corryou time and moncy, Preparc for inspectioll.j rrrursl,the following check list. t. l. b. c. d. e. f. Rcrd tV0lD supplicd informrtion ,.,-.. . . ,, Sce if up permit lr required Ptt'test wrter rnd sewcr to assure it wilr pasr when Inrpector arriver Rcqucst inspections at lcasr 4g hours prior to when you wsnt themPipc depth 36'minimum prpe zone) -.L :. ? Contct brckfill (surd, cindcn) 1,. Brckflll below pipe 6,I. Btckfill above pipe 12.j. Trcnch fill 3/4 minus nuive Correct septration of warer tnd sewer (warer 12" min. above and 3'miriimum to the sidc of scwcrI -utll k. Compaction: pipe zone - gSVo, mid zone . gOVe ,lop zone 95%, all other off pEvement snd out ofright of way in eascmenr g5%l. Sumpcd plurs u sitc tD. Building permlt rt site . 'rL Corect boxe: . Chriny O:i or equlvelent (warcr, rowcr; ",, '. o. No lcaks . wrtcr or tcwerp. Utility lines rr.built parcel, or sitc plan dnwing complcteq. brckwsrcr vrlvc . inrullstion approvedr. brck flow prevenrion dcvicc . (estcd and approved .. ,.t- mcter .I t' bclon grudc o PtOpcr sizc ":-":' ' : ,: t Type K copper only..- 4''.C.SOO propcr.,- " t"':? o Fire syslem (comct bockflow prevenrion;o -Flue or pac joinr fitringsr Rlscr pipcr 4' or lrrgcr J I ! ' r Conucr IVGID for soldcr fltrlng useo Curb Srop. Mucllerori.serl tt or cquivalcnt. no wastc/drain pon on stop valvcs 2. Finel tnsneerion l. All preliminrry inspectlonr complete.b. Wrtcr rnd rcwcr boxet viribtc ler to gndcc, Flnuret sctd. Approvcd plrnr on siree.' Building permir on sircf Rcmodcls: as.builr drawinls completc8. No cncroEchmcnt of cascmcns. contact IVGID tnspecror ar 832- l 209 tbr funher informarion. -.. . foundrtiory'propcrty line 45t .. 100 frr. No glucd fitringsr Cbnect fall . t/r'to the foot.' Scwcr pump stsuon tcst prior to finrl inspccrion o ' SDR.2I 2'lgwcr cjecror pump linco Duplex pump 3ystcm with rlrrm rnd red light.' lntcmrl clean.out capr Etco T.cone or equivalcnt. Not screw typc qurhlrt!.0<rc uawS tThil list is intendcd to assist you in preparing for lnspcctions. Do not rely rolely on rhis llsr to guidc yourconstruction. lvGlD ordingnce und UPC requirements musr rlways bc followcrl in their futt aeuil. Wright Water Engineers, tnc. B lB Colorado Ave. P O. Box 219 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Bl602 19701 945-7755 TEL 19701 945-9210 FAX (303) 893- r 608 DENVER D|RECT- L|NE April 27, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Office Regulatory Office & Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3303 RE: Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan - Review of Additional ISDS Analyses Dear Mark: On April 13, 1998, Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (WWE) submitted our recommendations to Garfield County regarding ISDS issues for the Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan. Since then, the County has received additional information from consultants for the adjacent property owners. This letter presents our review of the additional comments and analyses regarding the ISDS issues. In addition, as technical advisors to the Board, we have provided a summary of our opinions on this matter. New information reviewed since our April 13, 1998 letter includes: r Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. Potential Impacts on Groundwater Flow and Quality Due to use of Individual Septic Systems for Domestic Wastewater Treatment and Disposal, prepared by Mclaughlin water Engineers, Inc., dated April 1998. o Testimony by John M. Kaufman, P.G., c.P.G., of Mclaughlin water Engineers, Ltd., and John Currier, P.E., of Resource Engineering, Inc. at the April 13, 1998 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing. e Memorandum from Garfield County engineer Robert Szrot dated April 17, 1998. o Addendum to the above-referenced Mclaughlin Water Engineers report received via fax on April 24, 1998. o lrtter from Gamba and Associates to Colorado Mountain College dated April 21, 1998 and received with cover letter from Beattie & Chadwick to the Board dated April 27, 1998. o Irtter report from Resource Engineering to Greg Boecker dated April 23, 1998. DENVER {303) 480-t 700 DURANC() 1970) 259 741t BOULDER - i303) 47-3-9500 Mark Bean Garfield County planning Office April 27, l99B Page 2 Irtter from Bishop-Brogden Associates to Greg Boecker dated April 23, lggg. Irtter from Bruce coilins to Greg Boecker dared Aprir 27,199g. In addition, it is anticipated that further written comments will be provided by the applicant.However, we do not believe any of these rebuttal comments or additional analyses will changeWWE's comments presented below. SUMMARY Based on review of analyses by Resource Engineering, Mclaughlin water Engineers, Gamba& Associates, Bishop-Brogden Associates, and Bruce Collins, we offer the following comments. o Based on available data and current regulations, properly designed and installedISDS systems (conventional, mounded, or other engin..r.o syste"m; appear feasiblefor the project. o Impacts to groundwater quality will result from the use of ISDS systems and can begenerally quantified in terms of change in the concentration of nitrate in thegroundwater. Based on the engineering analyses by Resource Engineering andMclaughlin Water Engineers, and other available data, we believe the cumulativeconcentration of constituents in the local groundwater will be less than State andEPA drinking water standards. o Recommendations,on DgsUn Standards and Management plan in WWE,s April 13,1998 letter should be followed. In addition, we recorlmend that the aiplicanidevelop the detailed design criteria for each type of possible ISD5 sysrem tominimize water quality impacts. o In further response to Commissioner Martin's question on "Engineering TechnicalPreference of ISDS vs. central Sewer," we believe that, frJm a water qualityperspective, central sewer is preferable. This is primarily due to the state,s uUlityto control and regulate a point source discharge to meet both existing and futur;standards. Site specific conditions which relate io technical feasibility and economicsof connecting to the nearest central system must also be considered in evaluating themethod of sewage disposal. Mark Bean Garfield County planning Office Aprrl27, 1998 Page 3 o Section 32-1-1006 of the Colorado Revised Statutes 1996 Cumulative Supplementstates that proposed development within a sanitation district's boundary and within400 feet o-f an existing central sewer main can be required to connect to the centralsystem' It is our understanding that the proposed project is outside the currentSpring valley Sanitation Districiboundary, but within the district service area. Werecommend that the applicant document, for the record, the technical feasibility andeconomic constraints to central sewer including the option presented by the CountyEngineer in his April 17 , lggS memorandum. This may bi useful ro the Board intheir decision process. Please call if you have any questions or need additionar information. Very truly yours, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. MJE/dIf 921-047.040 Michael J. Erion, By' (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 E/VG,,VEEFS.- suRvEYoRs--Sr.*M-- iCIMUESEF : GOFDON MEYER 118 West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, C0 81601 LARP FILINGS 6.10 OPINION OF COST CENTRAL SEWER SYSTEM . CAPITAL COSTS A. LOT COSTS1. STEP Units2. STEG Units3. Tap Fees4. Service Lines (160'/lot) B. INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS'1. Mobilization Lump Sum2. Service Taps 16g ea @ $ 2OO.OO3. Service Lines (30'/tot) 5O4O ea @ $ 2S.OO4. Pressure Collection Lines 2S,OOO LF @ S 3O.OO5. Gravity Coilection Lines 12,OOO LF @ S 3S.OO6. Gravity Manholes/Cleanouts S0 Ea @ $ 2,SOO.OO7. Pressure Cleanouts S0 Ea @ $ 3,SOO.OO8. Air Release Vault 9 Ea @ $ 4,OOO.OO9. Connection to Existing System t ea @ $ 5,OOO.OO10. Odor Control Lump Sum TOTAL ISDS . CAPITAL COSTS A. ISDS Systems 1 . Standard systems 169 @ 56,5002. Nitrate reduction 168 @ $4,SOO TOTAL CENTRAL SEWER SYSTEM - MONTHLY COSTS 1 . Central Treatment plant 2. STEP/STEG Systems Operation and Maintenance3. Mil Levy (taxes) ISDS - MONTHLY COSTS 1. ISDS Operation and Maintenance Prepared by Dean W. Gordon, P.E. May 18, 1998 108 each @ $6,000 60 each @ $S,OOO 168 each @ $2,000 168 each @ $+,OOO Subtotal $ 649,000$ 300,000 s 1 ,1 76,000$ 672.000 s2,7g6,OOO $ 1 6,642llot $200,000 $ 33,600 s 1 26,000 $750,000 $420,000 $ 125,000 s 1 75,000 $ 36,000$ 5,000 $ 20,ooo Subtotal $ 1 ,890,600 2o7o construction contingency, design, legal & const. services $37B.oooSubtotal $2,268,600 $ 5,064,600 $30,146ilot $ 1 ,O92,000$ 756.000 $ 1,848.000 $ 1 1 ,000/lot $ 40.oo $ 13.00 $ 15.00 $68.OO/month $ 1 8.OO/month 1502C19.OOC Johns-Manville Utri Ring-llte PVC Pressure Rated Pipe per ASTM D2241 r , Ring-Tite PVC Pressure Pipe Description Pipe conforms to ASTM D2241 lor Standard Dimension Ratios: 125 psi pipe-SDR 32.5; 160 psi pipe-SDR 26:2OO psi prpe-SDR 21. Extruded from clean, virgin, approved class 12454-A PVC resin compound contorming to ASTM Specification D1784. Rubber rings contorm to ASTM Dl869 and F477. Applications Rural water, agricuitural and turf irrigation pipelnes. The pressure rating of the prpe-125 psi, 160 psi, or 200 psi-indicates the maximum allowable sustained pressure with a long-term 2 to 1 safety factor. Meets Accepted Standards J-M Ring-Tite PVC prpes are tested to levels as shown in ASTM D2241. Designed lor lnstalled-Cost Savings Save in handling costs. Most sizes can be handled manually, so there is no need for costly installation equipment. Use the backhoe for excavating and backlilling only. Dig more trench, lay pipe faster, save more in costs per foot installed. Save in excavating and backfilling. No need to make the trench large enough to work in. Joints can be made "on-top." The trench width can be limited to the pipe diameter plus four-inch minrmum space on each side of the pipe. This means less earth to be excavated, backfilled and tamped, and savings in time and equipment costs. Save on fittings and thrust blocks. J-M Ring-Tite PVC pipe can be curved as shown in the iable to eliminate many corners that would requrre elbows and bends. The costs of these items and labor are saved. Min. Radii ol Curvature Size (in)Radius (feet) 1Vz 2 ZVz 3 4 6I 10 12 38 50 63 75 100 150 200 250 300 \ Test ASTM D2241 125 psi '160 psi 200 Psi Long Term Pressure Tesl 1000 hours 260 340 420 Quick Term Burst Test 630s00400 Acetone lmmersion Test A measure ol proper fluxing and precise temperature control 20 min. 20 min. 20 min. Flattening Test Tests extrusion quality and ductility under slow loadinq conditions. 607" in 60% in 60"/o in 2-5 min. 2-5 min. 2'5 min. , Make Tight Joints in Seconds That's all there is to tt, a stmpte procedure that makes tight joints in seconds. No waiting for solvent cement to dry. No field- mixing or application of cement, or adjusting set-up times due to weather conditions. Joint is ready right away for full pressure. And each joint is an expansion joint. No need to "snake" the pipe. The Ring-Tite ioint saves time and money. Clean Bell and End. Be sure no dirt can lodge between the ring and the bell or pipe end. Set Ring in Groove...with painted edge lacing toward end of bell. Lubricate Pipe End...with a light film of lubricant. Push End ln...so that reference mark on spigot end is flush with end of bell. q-' Cut, Bevel, and Tap Ouickly Cut with saw, as shown, or other approved PVC cutting tool. Bevel ends with trand beveling tool, as ;hov" Pilot tool. Mark rut ends as L:11;,r,,,6, ,.irother end olr 'ze pipe to locate the f €r€r._ ,c9 mark accurately. , T^. . - , ,yand ' .,rli .. i :.1 .: ,l' 5g tapping tool SUlt6ui€ lor P v - pipe only. a. Duplex Grinder Pumps INSTALLATION AND SERVICI NG INSTRUCTIONS DUPLEX GRINDER PUMP PACKAGED SYSTEM FOR I NDOOR INSTALLATION MODEL: 812-3036D (30" dia. x 36" DeeP Basin) cu' ,r" , o'"i:o/ r"lonn P 4r4,PL-ut B a-UL-' 13800A793 SECTION PAGE - ti,*Fl PACKAGE System is completely packed and shippedin cardboard carton. Carton is marked with Myers model number and factory engineering number. All parts needed are packagLO insiO6the basin for shipping. The pumps and electrical control box are shipped separately. These instructions are only for installing basin and mounting pumps in basin. Sde separate pump and electrical control boxinstructions included with these items. PACKAGE INCLUDES l.Heavy fiberglass basin with steel sump cover and two removable cast iron pump covers with flanges. Sump cover has 3,, NPT vent flange. 2."O" ring seal inlet flange for 41/2,, O.D.plastic pipe. 3.Two -11/2" galvanized support pipes andconduit for motor cords. 4 ]wo - |Va" galvanized discharge pipes. Each pipe in two sections with thread on one end only. 5. Two -11/a" slip couplings to connect discharge pipes. 6. Four- FLCW levelcontrol switches. 7. Two - CV-1 25 angle check valves. 3. Basin is now ready to set in ground. pour ( cement around basin and up to basin flange to make a neat job and to anchor basin in the ground. See Figure 2. PREPARING PUMP FOR MOUNTING IN BASIN 1. Screw one-half of 11/a" galvanized discharge pipe into each pump. Use pipe dope or teflon tape on threads. 2. Pull the two motor cords up through 11/2,, galvanized support pipe and screw into each pump. Be sure pipe coupling is on pipe. 3.Connect other half of 'lTq" discharge pipe with 1t/q" slip coupling. Tighten tight, so pressure will not cause coupling to slip. 4. Place pump cover over pipes and tighten flange to hold in place at height shown on Figure 3. ( c0R0s T0 coilTRoL 80X MYERS CV.1251%" ANGIE CHECX VATVE SEPARAIE LIFT-OFF PUiIP COVER CAST IROI{ 1Vr" DISCIUiRGE PIPE 1h,, SUPPORT PIPE AIIO COIIOUIT FOR ilOTOR COROE L/G.20 GPt!{c:9 PUtl!- 3,' VETIT PIPE I N STALLATION I NSTRUCTION S Figure 1 shows section of basin with a call out of parts. Figure2showsatypical installation including discharge piping. 1. Remove pump cover from basin and take out all parts. DO NOT REMOVE STEEL BAS]N COVER. 2. Use template furnished with inlet flange and cut hole in ba.in and drill for mounting bolts. Mount inlet flange at height required, but not lower than shown on Figure 3. LEVEL COIITBOL IIFNIG EYE 8Aslil C0VE8 STEET IIII.ET FTAi{GE FoR 4'A" 0.0. PLASTIC PIPE 30" r 30" FIsERGLASS SUMP EASII{ Duplex system with WG 20 grinder pumps 30,, x 36" fiberglass basan FIG. 1 MEMORANDUM Mark Bean, darfield County Planning Office (APR I * I?9S TO: FROM: DATE: RE: oz Ui(E lrJul =oz IJJ tr UIF =F o E = Wright Water Engineers, Inc. - r / / rl ,4 ' P.eEy M. Bairey and MichaerrriorrflUb4ffi.4?rt April 9, 1998 I Los Amigos Preliminary Plan Review We are in receipt of additional drainage analysis and ISDS analysis for the proposed Los Amigos project. We reviewed the following documents. o Los Amigos Ranch Preliminary Plan, Filings 6 through 10, Stormwater Detention Analysis, April 1998, prepared by SGM. o Memorandum to WWE dated April 8, 1998 from Dave Kotz, P.E. with SGM. r Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. Individual Wastewater Treatment Systems Groundwater Impact dated April 6, 1998, prepared by Resource Engineering. o April 8, 1998 letter to WWE from Resource Engineering. o April 9, 1998 letter to WWE from Resource Engineering. The following are our comments. Drainage Analysis In general, we found the updated drainage analysis including detailed calculations for detention pord riring and operation to be acceptable for preliminary plan submittal. The applicant is proposing the use of four detention ponds located in the upper reaches of the four sub-areas *itt i1the site. Volumes have been calculated for maintaining historic runoff, under developed conditions, for storms up to and including the 100-year flood event. Calculations indicate that all post-development flows will be at or less than existing conditions. The detention ponds that were submitted were a generic computer generated pond configuration developed to fit in all four basins. Although the calculations indicate that this pond will work in each basin, the final plans shall include a detailed grading plan with stage-storage volume relationships developed based on the actual topography. We reviewed this with Dave Kotz with SGM and he is in agreement with our comment. MEMO TO: Mark Bean April 9, 1998 Page 2 We believe the data Recommendation. fulfills Condition No. 9 of the Planning Commission ISDS Impact Analysis The Resource Engineering report concludes that their analysis, together with the commitment to construct and maintain quality ISDS systems with design standards and management plan, indicates that there will be no adverse impact to groundwater quality. Based on our review, we generally concur with the Resource Engineering conclusions. The analysis includes a number of engineering assumptions and judgment. We reviewed the analysis making more conservative assumptions in all cases and found that the Resource Engineering analysis would result in a cumulative total nitrate concentration of less than 7 mgA. This is less than the State and EPA standard of 10 mgll. Given the applicability of water quality standards and pollutants typically associated with septic tank/leachfield effluent, the primary pollutant of regulatory concern expected to be associated with septic tank/leachfield effluent is nitrate. Nitrate is typically selected as the limiting pollutant from the regulatory perspective for several reasons including: (1) pollutants associated with septic tank/leachfield contamination are commonly known to be nitrate and viral/bacterial contaminants; (2) nitrate is known to be highly mobile in subsurface environments, while viral/bacterial contaminants are more easily absorbed onto soils; (3) the regulatory limit for nitrate is low relative to typical nitrate loadings in septic system effluent; and (4) nitrate concentrations are quite low in undeveloped and uncontaminated stream systems. We believe this recent detailed analysis fulfills the submittal requirements of BOCC Resolution No. 96-34, Paragraph 5. WWE previously recommended a monitoring and mitigation plan in the absence of a detailed quantitative analysis. With this additicnal anilysis, the stringent design standards, and the maintenance plan, we believe the applicant has developed an acceptable alternative approach as outlined in Condition No. 8 of the Planning Commission Recommendation. WWE will have additional detailed comments on the design standards and maintenance plan. PMB/MJE/dIf 92t-047.040 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 DATE: TO: FROM: RE: ENGINEERS SURVEYORS SG,M SCHMUESEB : GORDON MEYEB MEMORANDUM fiAfr#*ts $}.8{ i Y VIA MAIL AND FAX:945-921O April 8, 1998 Michael Erion Peggy Bailey Wright Water Engineers David M. Kotz, ,.r. 0n( Los Amigos Preliminary Plan, Filing 6 through 1o, Detention Analysis Follow-up on Tooics From Our April 7. 1998. Meetinq This memo responds to the partially unresolved items we discussed yesterday: 1 . Source of Rainfall Data - The 1OO-year, Z4-hour storm total was taken from Figure S-7 in "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado". A copy ofthe cover sheet and Figure S-7 is attached. You can see that Figure S-7 is identical to that found in NOAA Atlas 2, Volume lll for May through October events, with the exception that the title of the graph has been changed to"lsopluvials of 1OO-Yr., 24-Hr. Precipitation in Tenths of an lnch". As lstated yesterday, these charts are the only ones I have ever seen and utilized for hydrologic calculations for this area. My speculation that the annual isopluvials included the winter time snowfall events was f urther supported by information I received from Paul Currier and John Currier of Resource Engineering. They raninto this situation a few months ago and discussed the matter with Nolan Doesken, an Assistant State Climatologist for the Department of Atmospheric Science at CSU. His phone number is 970-491-8545. The conclusions drawn from Resource's discussion with Nolan were that the annual maps did include snowfall events and that the May through October charts would be more applicable for rainfall events. I tried reaching Nolan this morning, but wasunsuccessful. Nonetheless, I am confident that the rainfall charts used toanalyze Los Amigos are applicable f or the scs rR-bs Methodology."Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado " incorporated TR-bS and was intended as a supplement to the original TR-SS. 2. Use of the CONIC Method for Reservoir Volumes - Yesterday I erred in stating that a description of the method was contained in HEC-2. The description I wasthinking of is contained in HEC-1. Pages 36 and 37 describe the procedure and are attached. As stated yesterday, this method is supposed to yield a more accurate calculation of reservoir volumes than the average end area method. ,^ttni' '',118 West 6th. Suite 200 Glenwbod Springs, CO 81601 ,\-a: April 8, 1998 Memo to Erion and Bailey Page 2 Construction of the Ponds - I agree that a detailed Grading plan for eachspecific detention pond location will have to be prepared in order to ensure thatan adequate elevation versus storage relationship exists for the constructedpond. Yesterday, I just wanted to emphasize that the elevationistorage relationship utilized in the calculations was practical for the sites being considered. I hope this memo adequately addresses the items we discussed yesterday. please do nothesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions or require further information. DMK 15O2C19/lec Attachments cc: Greg Boecker, Los Amigos Ranch partnership scHMUEsER GoRDoN ME'ER. rNc. l 5ch,/i, PROCEDURES EOR DETERI"TINING PEAK FLOWS IN COLORADO INCORPORATES AND SUPPLE}MNTS TECHNICAL RELEASE NO. 55 URSAN HYDROLOGY FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS I T I ilIJ Itris handbook is a revision of a handbook bearing Ehe same uirle dared : January 1977. IE is inEended for use in deEermining peak flows for Ehe I design of conservaEion measures and for esE,imaEing effecEs of land uset changes and sErucEural reasures on peak raEes of discharge. t{ore deEailed j procedures are available in Soil ConservaEion Service National Engineering I llandbook, SecEion 4 - "Hydrology". IIIEH-4 is recommended for invesEigation I of waEersheds greaEer Ehan 25 square miles in size. i T il t I t I I ::':,:::";;ti::"" service Erke C. KingI I l'larch I 9 80 5. r::l E!:=t 5a 5i3 rE iit :i iif Ei Jxi dE iIi iE.tz 5 !all id:zE t=czt aa l --.1I I _=-3rn Gl o rl,Et"€ =-GlEIOL oC], -T l, = rLl =t d .a F rtaq,E: I EI EIoElr3EtE 8-r rl I+ .-tr-( I I't -3 r_t-_- I I I I r = llI , a lt _.: (," t\ I I_1 I I -l'-.1,'r 'l -:--lL-----L-=.\- | -o-. i? ; ),)' .tJiji, - t--t I I I I-' I.- |--l-l .', l: l -T,r( $Q | -)lvlrt I ]=l- l , I I I _ + 1q__= FRc f ,\ r f!rA i\,t _ noi ';ii-J , ,'ll'v' 3.5.5 Level-Pool Reservolr Routlng Level-poo1 reservolr routlng assumes a 1evel water surface behlnd thereservoir. It l-s used ln conjunctlon wlth the punp optlon described ln Sectlon 3.8 and wlth the dam-break calculatlon descrlbed ln Sectlon 6. Uslng the prlnclple of conservatlon of rDass, the change ln reservolr storage, S,for a glven t,lne perlod, At, J.s equal to average lnflow, I, mlnus average outflow, 0. tr:tt-rrlrz-or1oz ...... ... (3.65)At 2 2 An lt,erative procedure 1s used to det,ermine end-of-period storage, 52, andoutflow, 02. An lnltlal estlmate of the water surface elevatlon at [he endof the tlDe Perlod is made. 52 and 02 are conputed for thls elevatlon and substltuted 1n the followlng equatlon: y-52-Sl Ar (rl ) sp1llway adequacy Sectlons 12.7 and Flow through where Q ts the computed outflow, COQL 1s an orlfLce croaa-sectlonal area of condult, WSEL 1s the waterls the elevatlon at center of 1ow-1evel outlet., and Flow over the splllway 1s computed from L *Ir Or *Oo f-:oo..22 Oriflce and Welr F1ow. Ihls optlon is often used in lnvestlgatlons of dan safety, see E:<anple problens, L2.8. a 1ow-leve1 out.let 1s computed from Q - coQL * 6AREA r, \E* (wsEt _ ELrvt;EXrl (3.65) shere Y ls the contlnulty error for the estluated elevatlon. Ttre estlnated elevatl.on 1s adJueted untll Y ls wlthln * 1 cf s (ro3/sec). (1) Regervolr Storage Data. A reservolr storage volume versug elevatlon relatlonshtp 1s requlred for 1evel-pool reservoir routlng. Ttlerelatlonshlp may be speclfled 1n two ways: 1) dlrect lnput of precomputed storage versus elevatlon data, or 2) computed from surface area verguselevatlon data. The conlc method 1s used to coupute reservolr voluue froo eurface area versus elevatlon data, FlB. 3.10. The volume ls aseumed to bezero at the lowest elevatlon gl.ven, even lf the surface area ls greater thanzero at that poLnt. Reeervolr outflow may be computed from a deserlptlon of t.he outlet workg(low-leve1 outlet and splllway). There are trdo subroutlnes ln HEC-1 which coDPute outflow ratlr€ curves. The flrst uses slnple orlflce and welr flow eguatlons wh1le the second computes outflow from speclfLc energy or destgn graphs and correcEs for tallwater submergence. coefflclenE, CAREA is the surface elevatlon, ELEVL EXPL ls an exponent. 36 Q = coQI{ * spwrD * (wsEL - cREL)ExHf . . . . . . . . o . . . . . (3.6g) where Q ls conputed outflow, coQW is a welr coefflclent, spl{rD ie theeffectlve wtdth of splllway, WSEL 1s the water surface elevatlon, CREL ie thesptllway crest elevatlon, and EXPTI tB an exponent. If punping or dan breaks are not belng sl.uulated, an outfloy ratlngcurue 1s computed for 20 elevations whl.ch span the raage of elevatlone givenfor storage data. Storages are coaputed for thoee elevatl.one. The routlngls then accompllshed by the nodlfled Puls nethod uslng the derlvedstorage-outflow relatlon. For level-pooI reeervolr routlng wlth puuplng or dam-break slnulatlon, outflows are couputed for the orlflce and welr equatlons for each tlne lnterval. avr.'lter+e.+@) xr.r/(/e-l-r) !ttara AY|i r p16 5tai )a rG l -a tr AI . artcca ]ra cl lca Ir El t .bEll6 ol b. lr t r rflcal airtoica ( E2- El) Ltil Er.. llia A2raia llT r Lldrr ol trui{l.d Ft ol a.. Flgure 3.10 Conic Method for Reservolr Volumes ,\/\t-^-\ 37 tta,r"