The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 ApplicationLOS AIVUGOS RANCH PUD FILING 6I 10 APPLICATION TO MIEND PRELIMI I'IARY PIAN ," / JUNE 1999 RECEIVEBJUN 2 31999 APPLICATION TO AMEND PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR LOS AMIGOS RANCH PUD, FILINGS 6. 10. L History of Approved Preliminary Plan. A brief review of the history of the approved Preliminary Plan for Los Amigos Ranch PUD, Filings 6 - 10 (the "Approved Preliminary Plan"), will help to better understand the modifications requested by the within Application and the reasons therefor. In Novemb er,1997 ,the Applicant filed its application for Preliminary Plan approval for Los Amigos Ranch Filings 5A - 1 1 (the "Initial Preliminary Plan Application"). The Initial Preliminary Plan Application involved the same real estate which is the subject of the within Application. It requested approval for 174 single family lots. Of tho se 174lots, 164 were contained in Filings 6 - 10 and were proposed to receive wastewater treatment service through individual sewage disposal systems ("ISDS"), and 10, those contained in Filings 5,A. and 10, were proposed to receive centralized wastewater treatment service from the facilities of the Spring Valley Sanitation District. The Initial Preliminary Plan Application also requested approval for 4 rural residential lots, each greater than 35 acres, proposed for ISDS, and a "neighborhood commercial" tract of approximately 4.5 acres which would receive central sewer service from the Spring Valley Sanitation District. In its comments to the Initial Preliminary Plan Application, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment asserted that the existing Spring Valley Sanitation District wastewater treatment facility did not have sufficient permitted capacity to provide central sewer service to the 10 single family lots and neighborhood commercial tract which were proposed for such service. Based upon that comment, and the provisions of C.R.S. 30-28-136(1XgX2), Garfield County staff recommended denial of the Initial Preliminary Plan Application. In light of that recommendation, by letter dated January 21.,1998, the Applicant withdrew the Initial Preliminary Plan Application and submitted a new Application for Preliminary Plan for Los Amigos Ranch Filing 6 - 10 (the "Approved Preliminary Plan Application"). The Approved Preliminary Plan Application involved the same real estate which was the subject of the Initial Preliminary Plan Application and which is the subject of the within Application. The Approved Preliminary Plan Application requested the subdivision of 164 single family lots with an average size of 3.1 acres, which were proposed for ISDS. It also requested approval of the same 4 rural residential lots which were part of the Initial Preliminary Plan Application and which were again proposed for ISDS. The Approved Preliminary Plan Application did not request approval for any residential or cofilmercial property which would receive central sewer service, and instead identified those properties as "presently undevelopable." The Approved Preliminary Plan Application went through a lengthy series ofpublic hearings at which the most significant issue was the appropriateness of ISDS on the 164 single family lots. That public hearing process culminated in the Board's adoption of Resolution No. 98-30 which -l- / approved the application. However, Resolution No. 98-30 contained the following condition of approval: 12. As a result of the determination of this Board set forth in Findings paragraph 5 (see above), as a condition of approval the method of sewage disposal shall be a low pressure central sewage disposal system of a type similar to that proposed by the Garfield County engineer, with the cost of the central sewage line to be borne by the developer. The reason for the within Amended Preliminary Plan Application is to respond to the above quoted condition of approval in Resolution No. 98-30. il, Requested Amendments to the Approved Preliminary Plan. By the within Application the Applicant is requesting preliminary plan approval for 174 single family lots, 4 rural residential lots, and a "neighborhood commercial" tract of approximately 4.5 acres. As required by the provisions of Resolution No. 98-30, it is proposed that all of such properties, except for the 4 rural residential lots, be provided with central sewer collection facilities. The proposed modifications to the Approved Preliminary Plan are summarized in the following paragraphs. Except as expressly stated in the within Application, including the accompanying plan sheets and engineering drawings, all provisions of the Approved Preliminary Plan shall remain in effect. Because the Approved Preliminary Plan Application initially requested ISDS for all lots, there was no engineering detail for any central sewer collection system included. By the within Amended Application, the Applicant is requesting approval for the low pressure sewer collection system detailed in the engineering report dated June 22, 1999 attached hereto as Appendix A. The engineering information contained in Appendix A also verifies that the water system and drainage facilities are adequate to service the Amended Preliminary Plan. The requirement to install a central sewer collection system caused the Applicant to reexamine the lot layout of the Approved Preliminary Plan. As a result, the Applicant is requesting the following modifications to the Approved Preliminary Plan: 1. Filine No. 6. Two roadways within Filing No. 6 have been relocated to reduce the length of the central sewer collection line. This change resulted in some reconfiguration of approximately i0 lots within Filing No. 6 and in the conversion of one area of property identif,red on the Approved Preliminary Plan as "presently non-developable" into single family lots. Notwithstanding the lot reconfiguration noted above, there is no net change in the number of lots shown in Filing No. 6. A. B. -2- Filine No. 6A. The within Application requests approval for Filing 6A of Los Amigos Ranch P[ID. Filing 6,{ will consist of the approximately 4.5 acre commercial tract, one single family residential lot of approximately 4.4 acres and an open space tract. Approval for these parcels was requested in the Initial Preliminary Plan Application, but the parcels were identified as "presently non-developable" in the Approved Preliminary Plan Application because of the need to limit sewer service to only ISDS. Given the condition in Resolution No. 98-30 that all property within the Preliminary Plan be provided with a central sewer disposal system, there is no longer a reason to regard these parcels as "presently non-developable." Filing No. 7. No change. Filing No. 8. No change. Filing No. 9. The within Application requests Preliminary Plan approval for 60 lots within Filing No. 9 of Los Amigos Ranch PI-ID, which is a net increase of 9lots from the number shown in Filing No. 9 of the Approved Preliminary Plan. This increase of 9 lots is essentially a transfer of density from Filing No. 6 as requested in the Initial Preliminary Plan Application to Filing No. 9. This transfer of density is appropriate given that Filing No. 9 will now be served by central sewer and there is no longer a need to maximize lot sizes within Filing No. 9 to accommodate ISDS. This increase of 9 lots within Filing No. 9 results in a reduction in the average lot size within that Filing from approximately 3.25 acres per lot to approxim ately 2.8 acres per lot, and is entirely consistent with the approved PUD zoning for Los Amigos Ranch. FilingNo. 10. No change. III.Land Use Summary. The results ofthe requested amendments to the Approved Preliminary Plan as outlined above are summarized in the following land use table: 2. aJ. 4. 5. 6. -3- LAND USE TABLE Type of Use Number of Lots Total Acreage Average Per Lot Single Family t74 496.98 2.86 Rural Residential 4 223.56 55.89 Neighborhood Commercial 1 4.56 Open Space 936.47 Utility Tracts 2 5.77 Roads 44.33 TOTAL ACREAGE: 1,711.68 GROSS DENSITY: 9.6 Acres Per Lot As the foregoing land use table demonstrates, if approved, the within requested Amendment to Preliminary Plan for Los Amigos Ranch PIID Filing 6 - 10 will be entirely consistent with the approved zoning for the Los Amigos Ranch PUD. -4- APPE,NDIX A EIJG/,VEEES SURVEYORS (970) 94s-1004 FAX (970) 94s-5e48 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER "r 'l1B West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker, Owner's Representative Los Amigos Ranch Partnership 2929 County Road 1 14 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 RE:Application to Amend Preliminary Plan Submission Los Amiqos Ranch PUD - Filinqs 6 thru 10 Dear Greg: This letter is in support of an Application to Amend the Preliminary Plan submission for Filings 6 to 1O of Los Amigos Ranch PUD. Specifically, certain portions of Section 4:O0 Preliminary Plan of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations, as further outlined below, are addressed. This Amended Preliminary Plan will consist of 178 single-family homes and a neighborhood commercial parcel located immediately north and west of existing prior filings of Los Amigos Ranch PUD. lncluded will be four Rural Residential lots in excess of 35 acres located generally in the southwest part of the project. 4:80 DRAINAGE PLAN Attached hereto please find Los Amigos PUD Ranch Preliminary Plat Drainage Report. The methodology used is outlined in the attachment. The locations of drainage facilities are shown on the Drainage Master Plan Sheet LAD and the various roadway plan & profile sheets of the Preliminary Plan drawings. There are no existing water courses or lakes on this property. Tributary areas are localized in nature. Drainage Master Plan Sheet LAD shows the locations of minor on-site drainage basins denoted by Basin uXX". The locations of major drainage elements required to convey stormwater are denoted by a leader with the label "DE #XX". The Drainage Master Plan also shows information relating to the stormwater detention concept developed in conjunction with Wright Water Engineers' review of the approved Filings 6 thru 1O Preliminary Plat. The plan shows the locations of the four major discharge points for Los Amigos Ranch PUD denoted by "DP #X". Subareas indicated by heavy dashed lines are labeled "DPX.X" Cross-hatched areas within each drainage basin indicate the locations of proposed detention ponds. These ponds will attenuate the post-development flood peaks f or both the 2S-year and 1OO-year f loods to levels below those that would occur under June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 2 historic undeveloped conditions. An April 1998 report entitled "Los Amigos Ranch PUD Preliminary Plan, Filings 6 thru lO, Stormwater Detention Analysis" presented the lengthy hydrologic and detention routing calculations. Copies or this report are not included in this submission, but will be gladly furnished upon request. 4:9_1 WATER SUPPLY PLAN All of the lots proposed as part of this Amended Preliminary Plan submission will be serviced by the extension and improvements of the existing central water system. ln the case of the Rural Residential lots, alternative service with either individual wells or central water system extension is proposed. Extsrwa Wnren Svsrett The existing system consists of two drilled wells, identified as Well No. 5 and Well No. 6, a 320,000 gallon water tank, a control/chlorination building, numerous fire hydrants and a distribution system consisting of 1O",8" and 6" piping which serves allprevious filings within Los Amigos Ranch PUD. Two pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations divide the system into two pressure zones. The locations of the existing water system components are on the Preliminary Plan Master Water Plan Sheet LAU-2. Well No. 5 is a 5" steelcased well approximately 24Oteetdeep. The well has a static water level of 8O f eet and has been test pumped in the past to a total of 1 1O gpm with only a four foot draw down. Estimated potential well capacity is estimated in excess of 3OO gpm. Well No. 6 is a 1O" steel cased well with a total depth of approximately 260 feet. This well has been test pumped in the past at 4OO gpm. Current combined well yield of these two wells is approximately 51O gpm with a total potential yield in excess of 6OO gpm. The control/chlorination building contains the operating controls for the system. The required 30-minute chlorine contact time is provided by 460 feet of 24" water main within the system. The total volume contained within the piping is 1O,8OO gallons which provides more than 30 minutes of detention at the peak day pumping rate at build-out of the project of 251 gpm. The water system is classified as a public water supply by the Colorado Department of Health. Both the quality and bacteriological content of the water has consistently met all parameters of the State of Colorado Primary Drinking Water System. Warra Reauneueurs Table 1 enclosed herein indicates the current water requirements for Los Amigos Ranch PUD and the water requirements for Filings 6 to 10. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 3 The water system will provide both in-house domestic use and outside lawn irrigation uses. Average and peak day demands are calculated for both irrigation and non-irrigation seasons. As noted in Table 1, the water system has been sized to include the service of the Residential Rural lots, should they require service. Paoposeo Waren Svsrem Coupoueturs The proposed water system components to accommodate Filings 6-10 are shown on the Preliminary Plan Master Water Plan Sheet LAU-2. New 10", 8" and 6" transmission and distribution lines will be installed along with fire hydrants and 1 " or 1 Yz" water services for each lot. A new steel water tank will be required in the western portion of the project once development proceeds into Filing 9. The CYBERNET computer model was used to calculate pressures and determine required line sizes throughout the system. Fire flow demands, rather than peak hour demands, govern the design of the system. Lines were sized with the goal of providing a fire flow of at least 500 gpm at 20 psi. This was achieved in all areas. The fire hydrants were placed where they would benefit the most lots. The hydrant layout shown on LAU-2 has been done consistent with discussions with the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. Due to the large line sizes used, pressure diff erences that would occur under static conditions and peak daydemands are negligible. Assuming a mid-tank level, a maximum pressure of about 135 psi would be observed in the lowest portion of Filing 8. Some low pressure levels will occur on the lots in the northeast portion of the project in the vicinity of the water tank. The Water Master Plan Sheet LAU-2 indicates lots which fall above the elevation 7O9O/40 psi line. The significance is that, depending on where the actual homesite is situated, individual lot owners may wish to install a pump and pressure tank to obtain higher, in-house pressures. One and one-half inch diameter water services are also recommended for these lots to minimize the headloss that would occur from the water main to the house. The attached report entitled, "LosAmigos Ranch PUD Preliminary Plat, Filings 6-lO, Water System Calcutations" contains a computer model schematic and results of the fire flow analysis. Again, the maximum day pressures listed were virtually the same as the maximums observed under static conditions. Separate fire flow runs are provided for an analysis of the complete system with both tanks on line and "an east tank only" scenario which excludes Filing 9. The existing 32O,OOO gallon east tank was over-sized to accommodate potential f uture filings' Considering those areas east of Filing 9 (which has 6O lots) and the water demands referenced in Table 1, the minimum required tank volume can be calculated as follows: SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 4 EAST TANK Equalization 25o/o avetage total demandl 35,449 gallons Fire Flow 1 5002 gprn x 2 hours 180,00O gallons Emergency 1 average day (domestic)63,860 gallons Minimum required volume 279,309 gallons 1 2 Domestic and irrigation Auburn Ridge Apartments only; 500 gpm single family lots. Considering the incremental storage required to serve Filing 9 (60 lots), the minimum size of the western tank can be calculated as follows: WEST TANK Equalization 25o/o Average total demandl 9,71 2 gallons Fire Flow 5OO2gpmx2hours 60,0O0 gallons Emergency 1 average day (domestic)16,20O sallons Minimum required volume 85,91 2 gallons 1 2 Domestic and irrigation Single family lots Run.u Resoeunal Lors For purposes of sizing the central water system, service to the four (4) Rural Residential lots was assumed to be part of the water system. Because of the size of these lots and their location relative to the remainder of the project and the water system, this plan proposes as an alternative the ability to drill an individual well on each of these lots. With respect to the history of well development in this area, we have reviewed records available from the District Engineer's Office and have talked to local well drillers familiar with groundwater conditions. Wells have been variable with respect to well depth and well yield. Generally, the wells have been completed in bedrock formations or in the alluvial layers immediately above bedrock interfaces. Well yields are generally less than 1O gpm which would indicate intermediate storage between the well and the residence may be required depending upon total well yield. We anticipate the water would be classified as SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 5 "hard", but that all Colorado Primary Drinking Water Standards will be met. Depending on the degree of hardness, water softening may or may not be elected by the homeowner' With respect to fire protection for these lots, it is proposed to provide a 2OOO gallon cistern with draft pipe for use by firefighting apparatus. This cistern would be located near the residence and would be sited at the time that an architectural site plan is available for the residential building construction. 4..92 SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLAN Ensrtrua Satwranv DsPoset Fncnnrs Previously approved filings within the Los Amigos Ranch PUD are serviced by either individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) or a central wastewater treatment collection and treatment system operated by the Spring Valley Sanitation District (SVSD). Those portions of the PUD serviced by SVSD are properties which generally lie within the Spring Valley aquifer drainage and can be serviced by gravity collection sewerlines. The approximate boundaries of the spring Valley aquifer have been established during prior approvals. Cturnnt Wesrewaren Svsrem Central wastewater treatment and collection services are provided by the Spring Valley Sanitation District (svsD). The existing system consists of a gravity sewer collection system that serves both Los Amigos Ranch PUD and Colorado Mountain College (CMC), and an aerated lagoon wastewatertreatment facility utilizing exfiltration basins as a disposal method for effluent. Within the Los Amigos Ranch PUD, the central sewer system presently services Auburn Ridge Apartments and 49 single-family lots. Proposed Sewer Collection Facilities - Filinas 6 thru I O The wastewater collection system will be extended throughout Filings 6 thru 1O to provide collection of wastewaterto an additional 174 single-family lots. Because of the variations in the topography over the extent of the project, the vast majority of these lots will be serviced by a low pressure sewer collection system. This system varies significantly from the traditional gravity sewer collection system typically seen in municipal wastewater collection systems. As opposed to having large diameter sewer gravity pipes discharging to central lift stations, a low pressure sewer collection system utilizes pumping units on individual lots which feed a common small diameter pressure sewer force main. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 6 A number of low pressure collection system alternatives have been investigated by the Owner. The equipment and design methodology as employed e-one sewer systems of Niskayuna, New York, have been used as a reference specification for the system. Attached hereto is a preliminary design for the system directly trom e-one and dated May 10, 1 999. Sheet LAU-3 of the plans is a plan layout of the entire system. The force mains vary in size from 1 yr" to 4" . The system discharges to the existing gravity collection system of the SVSD. This system is consistent with the recommendations by the County Engineer on the previous submittal for Filings 6 thru 1O and upon which the condition of approval was written requiring a low pressure sewer collection system. lt is anticipated that this system will be owned and operated by either the Homeowners Association or SVSD from the point at which the connection is made to the gravity system of the SVSD. Sheet LAU-7 shows a typical pumping system that will be installed by each individual homeowner at the time individual residences are constructed. The homeowner will be required to construct a pumping System that is consistent with the design parameters for the e-one low pressure sewer system, sized in accordance with the wastewater collection requirements of each individual residence. Prooosed Wastewater Treatment Facilities - Sprinq Vallev Sanitation District Centraltreatment will continue to be provided by SVSD. The existing treatment facility is not sufficient in capacity to handle the treatment requirements of Filings 6 thru 10. SVSD is currently involved in the process of expanding the wastewater treatment facilities. An Amended Service Plan has been completed by the District and submitted to the County for review. That Amended Service Plan has been approved by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. lt will serve as a basis for expansion of wastewater treatment facilities, of which Los Amigos Ranch PUD is a portion. The next step in the evaluation process is the submission of a Site Application through Garfield County to the Colorado Department of Public & Environment (CDPHE). Currently, CDPHE is undertaking a 2OB Regional Water Ouality Management Plan for District 1 1, which encompasses the Roaring Fork River Drainage Basin. This plan has been completed in draft form and will be presented before the Water Ouality Control Commission in August, 1999, for final approval. SVSD is anticipating that, within a week after final approval of the 208 Regional Water Ouality Management Plan, the Site Application will be completed and submitted to Garfield County for consideration prior to review by the CDPHE. Completion of construction of wastewater treatment facility expansion will be dependent on the length of approvals by the various review agencies. The potential dates for completion range from the end of the construction season of year 2OOO to completion by mid-year 20O1 . SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC, June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 7 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (ISOS} Residential Lots With ISDS ISDS installations are being proposed for the four (4) Rural Residential lots shown on the Amended Preliminary Plat. Referencing the geotechnic report prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak included in this application, there have been nine percolation tests conducted throughout the filing. The percolation test results range from 1 1 minutes per inch to 40 minutes per inch. These percolation rates are indicative of subsurface conditions which are acceptable for ISDS to be constructed' The percolation tests were run at locations and in site soils conditions that are representative of the overall conditions throughout the project. Additionally, there are ten (1O) units within the existing Los Amigos Ranch PUD which have been installed and are using ISDS for sewage service. To the best of our knowledge, adequate percolation and subsurface conditions were found at all these sites for standard ISDS utilization. Environmental and Health lmpacts Analvsis Garfield County Sewage Disposal Regulations which, in turn, are based on the "Guidelines on tndividual Sewage Disposat Systems", Colorado Department of Health, set forth the conditions and regulations under which the County and the State of Colorado have determined are appropriate to the construction of ISDS. These regulations are very comprehensive with respect to site characteristics which determine the type and size of the system which can be constructed. Those regulations recognize the ability of a soil matrix to provide the necessary treatment to septic tank effluent such that, once the effluent passes through the soil matrix, the treated effluent does not pose a public health hazard or risk. The regulations further address the potential for cumulative impact of ISDS systems by specifying the minimum lot sizes that should be utilized for ISDS systems. ISDS technology recognizes that there are certain instances where there are inherent restraints to the use of ISDS's. These restraints include high groundwater table, underlying bedrock formations, inadequate percolation rate, horizontal separation from wells and water courses, and excessive percolation rate. Whenever any of these restraints exist, the regulations require that they be identified and that the system installed when restraints occur, be designed under the direction of a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado. A "standard" ISDS system, typically consists of a septic tank and leach field. ln order to use a standard ISDS, the underlying soil matrix should demonstrate percolation rates within acceptable defined limits and there should be identified no restraints to the installation of the system. As stated above, all systems currently installed within the Los Amigos Ranch PUD are standard systems, with acceptable percolation rates existing and no restraints to construction identified. Based upon data now available, it is anticipated that for the four Rural MUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 8 Residential lots, a standard system will be installed, ln each case, percolation tests and profile holes will be excavated at the location and depth of the proposed leach field at each individual building site in accordance with Garfield County regulations. The results of those tests will be analyzed and the system design based on percolation rate and size of residence. Attached to this letter report is a "Management Plan For lndividual Sewage Disposal Sysfems". As stated in the Plan, the purpose is to provide for the regular operation and maintenance of ISDS. This Plan has previously been incorporated into the covenants of Los Amigos Ranch PUD. The Plan will be included in the covenants adopted as part of the Preliminary Plan. Also attached to this letter report is a letter from Hepworth-Pawlak dated January 19, 1998, which further summarizes the field investigations performed on this site. As stated in the letter, Hepworth-Pawlak reiterates their conclusion from their original study which indicates that this site is suitable for individual septic systems while recognizing that mounding or other engineered systems may be required where a shallow bedrock restraint might be encountered' ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE Roadways within this project have been sized in accordance with current requirements of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Estimated service requirements are based on 10 vehicle trips per day (VPD) per individual lot. Typical road sections for the different roadway classifications are contained within the Preliminary Plan drawings. Roadway infrastructure as part of this filing will be as follows (next page): SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 9 The cul-de-sacs as shown will have an outside turning radius of 45 feet. All roadway grades are less than 8% and are detailed in the Preliminary Plan drawings. Please note that several of the roadways could be designed at a semi-primitive roadway classification. The Owner has indicated that the Rural Access classification will be used for all those roadways. Itrust that the above is adequate to support the Preliminary Plan Application for Filings 6-10 Los Amigos Ranch PUD. I will be available to provide further input and respond to any questions of any of the review agencies. I also plan to be in attendance at both the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and the Board of County Commissioners hearing to answer any additional questions. ,,,,,,i,,11s8,I,.9,t'S,,:ji:i :'i .i...II.liPSISiY.ii.:il ::lilt::i::::::iUPOlll:li:i::l:::::::: LOS AMIGOS DRIVE Sta 22+00 to Sta 143+15.38 150 1 500 l,linor CoI tector 2500 60 12 4 Sta 143+15.38 to END ?9 290 Seconda ry Aaaeqs 600 60 11 l+ WEST ROAD Sta 0+00 to Sta 23+08.25 26 260 S econda ry Access 600 60 11 4 Sta 23+08.25 to END 11 'l 10 RunaI Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD B 16 160 Seconda ry Access 600 60 11 4 ROAD C 12 120 RuraI Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD D 9 90 RuraI Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD E 11 110 RuraI Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD F 6 60 Rurat Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD G 5 50 RuraI Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD H 5 50 Rurat Access 200 50 11 ? ROAD I 1 10 RuraI Access 200 50 11 2 ROAD J 5 50 RuraI Access 200 50 11 2 GORDON MEYER,INC. June 22, 1 999 Mr. Greg Boecker Page 1 O Respectfully submitted, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. DWG:lec\1 5O2C 1 9.ppr Attachments SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. Dean W. LOS AMIGOS RANCH PUD WATER SYSTEM DEMANDS TABLE U'or =c m U'mu o A Existing Users Subdivision 1 Aoartments 48 units a 200 gpd = 29.5 EQRs = 7,970 ood 50,000 sf a 2.523 A-f/A = 6,300 gPd3 14,?70 sfi Subdivision 2, Fi Linss 1-5 69 sf units a 270 gpd = 18,630 gPd 204,000 sf a 2.523 A-l/A = 26,040 gfi 44,670 sfi SUBToTAL 26,600 sp4 32.340 cpd 58.910 qpd B Filings 6 thru 1O Sinste'fami Iy 178 sf units a 270 spd = /+8,060 sd 534,000 st d 2.523 A't/A = 67,184 sqd 115,241 sd Nei ghborhood Connrerc i a I 20 EoR A 270 spd = 54OO Spd4 10,000 sf A 2.523 A-f lA -- 12585 sPd 6558 spd TOTAL Averaqe Day = 80,060 spd = 56 ggtr = 100,782 gpd = 70 ggn 174,184 spd = 126 gpm Peak Day = 160,120 spd = 111 spn = 201,564 gpd = 140 sptn 348,368 gpd = 251 ggn o a)0oz =m m !D =f) 1 . 150-day application Period. 2. 3000 square feet per residential unit. 3. 50,000 sf total acreage. 4. 20 equivalent residential units. 5. 10,000 sf total acreage.1 5O2c 1 9.ppr\DWG\lec $EWEffi SYSTTHS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design AnalYsis For Los Amigos Ranch Colorado Prepared For: Schmueser Gordon MeYer 118 West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs CO Tel: 970 945-1004 Fax:970 94$5948 Prepared By: Bruce Richardson Mav 1 81601 Prepared By: Bruce Richardson PRELIMINARYPRESSURESEWER.PIPESZINGANDBRANCHANALYSIS Los Amigos Ranch Colorado May 10, 1999 Page I Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment one' Prepared By: Bruce Richardson PRELIMINARY PRESSI'RE SEWER. ACCUMULATED RETENTION TIME G{R) Los Amigos Ranch Colorado MaY lo' 1999 Average Daily Florv Average Fluid Changes per DaY Average Rdartiul Time (llr) Accunrulatxl Rdartion f ime (llr)Zqe Number Punps to Zane Accumulated Total ofCores this Zone Exi$ing Pipe Siiri:Gallons per 100 Lineal Fed Lorrylhof Zone Capacity ofZone This dshed was caiicuiatednilepilf 4rameers for: SDTIPVC , , -.----;;;T 11.29 2.13 I 1.43 1.00 2.00 6.00 4 2.00 18.84 658.00 123.98 9.30 12 2.00 IR R4 1,s52.00 292.43 4,200 14.36 t.67 2.00 12.07 335.00 !,fi LL 1,050 25.97 0.92 12.15 3.00 4.00 4.00 3 1.50 3,150 20.72 1.16 tt.22 5.00 9 2.00 807.00 I52.UO 40.90 1,390.00 56*, 45 5,600 9.85 2.44 10.07 5.00 6.00 16 3.00 13,650 19.91 t.2l 7.63 6.00 800 39 300 40.90 1,676.00 olJ).+z 8.11 2.00 18.84 521.00 98. l7 1,400 t4.26 l.CrU 7.00 8.00 4 1,503.88 19,950 13.27 l.8I 6.42 8.00 11.00 57 4.00 67.65 2,223.00 8.54t2.07 298,00 35.97 1,050 u.61, 9.00 10.00 11.00 7.74 3.10 7.72ll3.00 40.90 r,217.00 497.70 3,850 2,209.48 28,700 12.99 L85 4.61 53311.00 14.00 82 4.00 67.6s 484.00 58.42 1,050 3,150 17.97 1339 l.J4 12.00 13.00 J 1.50 t2.07 |,73 4.50 L7713.00 14.00 9 t0t 2.00 18.84 1,204.00 226.86 18.00 4.00 67.6s 2,769.00 1,873.26 52.38 35,350 18.87 t.27 1,050 20.04 1.20 5.25 15.00 16.00 J 1.50 t2.07 434,00 18.84 1.341.00 252.67 3,150 t2.47 1.93 4.05 16.00 17-00 17.00 18.00 9 2.t2 t2 2.00 IR R4 583.00 109.85 4,200 38.23 U.OJ 782.00 529.03 39,900 75.42 0.32 LN 1.50 18.00 20.00 20'00 tt4 4.00 o /.o)2.44 J 1.50 1) 01 459.00 55.40 1,050 18.95 I9.00 67.65 1,304.00 RR' 17 43,050 48.80 0.49 l.l8 20.00 22.00 123 4.00 1,050 31.86 0.75 018 1.44 21.00 22.00 3 1.50 12.07 273.00 )/.v 0.69 4.00 67.65 496.00 335.55 45,150 I J+. )t) 22.00 31.00 u.oo 24.45 0.98 0.98.,,,3.00 40.90 770.00 314.90 3&87 7300 24.00 1,050 27.02 0.89 483 25.00 26.00 1.50 t2.07 322.01) 1,328,00 250.22 3,1 50 12.59 1.91 5.94 26.00 27.00 9 18.84 1,465.00 276.04 6,300 22.82 n.6l 1.05 z.v 5 27.00 24.00 l8 J J.UU 1. l6 3.7r 1.50 12.07 422.00 50.94 1,05u 28.00 28.50 180. l3 3,150 t7.49 1.37 2.54 28.50 30.00 9 2.00 18 84 956.00 t2.07 471.00 s6.85 1,050 t8.47 I.30 2.47 29.00 30.00 J 1.50 t3s.66 4,900 36.12 47.35 0.66 051 t.l7 30.00 3ro0 31.00 t4 2.00 18.84 720.00 0.51 31.00 150 4.00 67.65 1,639.00 1,108.80 page I Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufacturedby Environment one LOS AMIGOS RANCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR INDIVTDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS A. Purpose The purpose of this Management Plan is to provide for regular operations and maintenance of the individual sewage disposal systems. The Management Plan provides a mechanism for regular pumping of septic tanks and for funding the cost thereof . This Management Plan is not intended to provide for common oWnership of sewage disposal facilities, nor to provide a mechanism for funding for, or the actual construction of, replacement of individual systems. B. Responsibility of Management Plan The Management Plan shall be the responsibility of the Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association. The Homeowners Association shall make arrangements with a septic tank pumping company for the pumping of septic tanks on a two-year, rotating basis. C. Funding The Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association will collect, as part of the Association dues, sufficient funds to pay for the bi-annual pumping of septic tanks. The amount of funds collected shall be adjusted as necessary to pay for the cost of the Management Pan. D. lndividual Homeowners Responsibilities 1 . Provide access to the septic tank for purposes of cleaning. 2. Pump septic tank more frequently, if required, based on actual use. 3. lnitially install, and subsequently replace, failed leach field systems as required, all in accordance with applicable Garfield county Health codes. 15O2isds.MP/dwg.lec SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. HrrwoRrH-Pert'lex GrorrcuxlclL, INC. January 19.1998 Greg Boecker 2929 County Road 114 Gienwood Springs, Colorado 81601 5010 Road 151 Glenuood 5prings, CO 81601 Fax 970 9t5-8{5{ Phone 970 9{5-7988 Job No. 196 617 Subject:Individual septic systems. Los Amigos Ranch p.u.D., counrl, Road l l4, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Boecker: As requested be Dean Gordon. we are providing clarification of our recommendations regarding individual septic systems for the proposed Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. We have received u .opy of the first 4 pages of preliminary plat review letter by Wright Water Engineers to Garfield County dated Januarv 9,1998. We performed a preliminary geotechnical study for the project under Job No. 196 6l 7, dated Februarv 14, 1997 . Individual Septic Systems: Percolation tests were conducted in January. 1997 to evaluate the feasibility of individual septic systems atthe site. The percolation rates varied from ll to 40 minutes per inch. The average of eleven percolation tests was about 24 minutes per inch. The tests were performed between 3 and 5Yz feet below the ground surface. All the tests were performed in the overburden soils above the basalt flow rock. Partial refusal to digging by the Case 780C rubber-tired backhoe was encountered shallou'er than 8 feet deep in l5 of 2l pits. The average refusal depth was 4'/z feet. Strether the refusal was on intact basalt flow or on basalt boulders within the overiying basalt colluvium soils could not be determined in the relativelv small backhoe pits. Based on our experience in the area and the site geologl,, we expect that the basalt flow is close to the refusal depths encountered in the pits. The development should be suitable for individual septic svstems. Mounding or other engineered systems may be required in shallow basalt rock areas. The system designs should be based on site specific soils information. Ifyou have an1' questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK G L. iNC. Daniel E. Hardin. DEH/ksm Schmueser Cordon Meyer - Attn: Dean Gordon LOS AMIGOS RAT,{CH PT]D PKELIMINARY PLAT, FILINGS 6.10 DRAII,{AGE REPORT FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION JUNE 1999 Prepared by: Schmueser Gordon MeYer, Inc. 118 West 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 970/945-1004 cover/1 5O2c19.wsc DRAINAGE NARR The Drain Subdivision is ratl^ hill, off-site wate slope of the land f with minor cross TR-55 ano to medium size be in this area of Col 55 analysis. The procec rainfall intensity c area in acres to ci based on land use County (Figure 1 group B. The run impervious and pr We The overal ,.gn, different ba for basins extend on 1" : 2OOO't calculate basin ar ln the casr used. Also, ditcl of the basins are The remai calculations perf information used DMK:lecVl 502c19.dr \RRATIVE 'ainage Plan for the Preliminary Plan, Filings 6-10 of Los Amigos Ranch rather simplistic. Due to the fact that the project is located near the ridge of a ater sheds were a small influence to the overall drainage of the project. The rd from south to north also allows the drainage to be carried by roadside ditches rss culverts at intersections and low points. and Rational Method are two means of determining peak flows within a small a basin. The Rational Method was chosen for this analysis due to the fact that, Colorado, it generally predicts higher flood peaks than those produced by a TR- procedure for using the Rational Method is one that utilizes a runoff coefficient, the rsity corresponding to the time of concentration of the basin, and the overall basin s to calculate the flood peak in cubic feet per second. The runoff coefficients are nd use, soil type and slope. The Soil Conservation Service Soil Study for Garfield ;ure 1) shows that soils found within these drainage basins are classified as soil he runoff coefficient for this project was calculated using a weighted formula for and pervious areas as shown: weighted c : [(0.95 * A,-r,_,o,.) + (0.26 * Ar"_,o,")l/A,o,", overall drainage plan is shown on Drawing LAD of the Preliminary Plan drawings. ent basins (Figure 2) were identified and used in hydrologic calculations. The areas rxtending outside the property area were determined by planimetering boundaries OOO' USGS quadrangle maps. A 1" : 500' scale AutoCADD map was used to asin areas within the property. le case of minor basins, areas under two acres, a minimum culvert size of 18" was r, ditch flows were found using a percentage of total basin flows since only parts 'rs are intercepted by roadside ditches. rmainder of this report consists of tables showing the results from hydrologic performed and drainage elements to be used. Followed by spreadsheet sed to calculate times of concentration for each basin. SCHMUESER GORDON MEY 95 s1W ) L<r , - u32! "7-< .?; aly'.. -Ett ' sil . i -Yi.->:.tl FIGURE 1 SOIL SURVEY MAP l So@rtFr CAITLE CREEK AUADRANCLE @LORADO-CARFIELD CO. 7.5 MINUTE SERTES (TOPOCRAPHTC) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ,07Ft .-.-lr - " (no a$ 692J n#,?2'-'t,'|ffi ,\\ I a\ Los Amigos PUD, Preliminary Plan filings 6-10 Job # '1502 Area DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS lmpervious Area (ft^2) Length (ft) Width (ft) Road Area (ft"2) Total lmpervious Area (Ac) Total Pervious Area (Ac)Basin # Lots I 30.21 2 10,000.00 720.00 13 9,360.00 0.46 29.75 2 15.98 4 20,000.00 1,750.00 15 26,250.00 1.10 14.88 3A 12.71 5 25,000.00 1,500.00 15 22,500.00 1.13 11.58 3B 33.31 14 70,000.00 3,450.00 16 55,200.00 2.95 30.3€ 4 1.84 1 5,000.00 1,000.00 13 13,000.00 0.48 1.36 192.00 16 3,072.00 5A 18.68 J 15,000.00 950.00 '15 14,250.00 0.69 17.99 5B 3.17 2 10,000.00 2,000.00 '13 26,000.00 0.87 2.3C 5C 62.27 11 55,000.00 1,850.00 13 24,050.00 2.31 59.96 1,360.00 16 21,760.00 b 130.30 13 65,000.00 406.00 13 5,278.00 2.80 127.5C 962.00 16 15,392.00 1,551.00 13 20,163.00 1,242.00 13 16,'146.00 7 3.85 0 0.00 1,006.00 16 16,096.00 0.39 3.46 o 26.91 4 20,000.00 1,551.00 13 20,163.00 1.21 25.7C 793.00 16 12,688.00 I 7.13 0 0.00 400.00 16 6,400.00 0.16 6.97 10 1 86.1 8 7 35,000.00 600.00 '16 9,600.00 1.36 184.82 1,141.00 13 14,833.00 11 14.45 J 15,000.00 1,141.00 13 14,833.00 0.71 '13.74 12 38.62 2 10,000.00 789.00 16 12,624.00 0.54 38.0[ 134 23.41 2 10,000.00 1,000.00 16 16,000.00 0.62 22.75 13B 10.19 1 5,000.00 819.00 16 13,104.00 0.43 9.76 14 400.96 a 35,000.00 s25.00 16 8,400.00 1.32 399.64 1,092.00 13 '14,196.00 15 64.53 11 55,000.00 1,092.00 '13 14,196.00 1.76 62.77 583.00 '13 7,579.00 2,309.00 16 36,944.00 164 27.66 6 30,000.00 1,750.00 '15 26,250.00 1.33 26.33 168 46.62 5 25,000.00 1,850.00 15 27,750.OO 1.25 45.37 17 24.47 8 40,000.00 1,134.00 13 14,742.00 2.?2 22.25 3,240.00 13 42,120.00 18 1.23 0 0.00 600.00 '15 9,000.00 0.22 1.01 19 20.20 4 20,000.00 1,000.00 15 '15,000.00 0.83 19.37 5A+58 21.85 5 25,000.00 40,250.00 1.50 20.35 5A+58+5C 84.12 16 80,000.00 64,300.00 3.31 80.81 2+3A+38 62.00 23 '1 15,000.00 103,950.00 5.03 56.97 1+6 160.51 15 75,000.00 66,339.00 3.24 157.2i 1 5+1 68 111 15 16 80,000.00 86,469.00 3.82 107.3: 10+1 1 200.63 10 50,000.00 39,266.00 2.05 '198.5€ DMK:dlc Page 1 los amigos #1502 Los Amigos PUD, Prelinimary Plan Filings 6-10 Job # 1502 25 - Yr Flood Peaks lmpervious Pervious Basin Tc Total 125 yr A Area Area Q25 Historic* -ASSUMES SAME BASIN DELINEATION AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION. (m acres) (acres Q25 (cfs) 1 21 2.50 30.2'l 0.46 29.75 19.29 18.54 2 20 2.42 '15.98 1.10 14.88 1 1.89 10.05 3A 20 2.42 12.71 1.1 '1 1.58 9.88 B.OC 3B 20 2.42 33.3'1 2.95 30.36 25.88 20.96 4 I 2.52 1.84 0.48 1.36 2.04 1.21 5A a)LJ 2.25 18.68 0.69 17.99 12.00 10.93 5B 20 2.42 J. t/0.87 2.30 3.45 .t oc 5C 25 2.16 62.27 2.31 59.96 38.41 34.97 o 31 1.88 130.30 2.84 127.50 67.32 63.69 7 26 2.12 3.85 0.39 3.46 2.69 2.12 o 22 2.34 26.91 1.21 25.70 18.33 16.37 o 19 2.47 I.t3 0.16 6.97 4.85 4.58 10 41 1.55 1 86.1 8 1.36 184.82 76.49 75.03 11 zo 2.08 14.45 0.71 13 74 8.83 7.81 12 28 2.00 38.62 0.54 38.08 20.83 20.08 13A 25 2.16 23.41 0.62 22.79 14.07 1 3.15 138 20 2.42 10.19 0.43 9.76 7.13 6.41 14 50 1.39 400.96 1.32 399.64 146.17 144.91 15 34 1.74 64.53 1.76 62.77 31.31 29.1 16A 25 2.14 27.66 1.33 26.33 17.35 '15.38 168 to 2.10 46.62 1.25 45.37 27.27 25.44 17 20 2.43 24.47 2.22 22.25 1 9.18 15.4e '18 10 3.26 1.23 0.22 1.01 1.54 1.04 '19 20 2.42 20.20 0.83 19.37 14.10 12.71 5A+5B 25 2.16 21.85 1.50 20.35 14.51 12.27 5A+5B+5C 30 1.92 84.12 3.31 80.81 46.38 4'1.99 2+34+38 26 2.08 62.00 5.03 56.97 40.75 33.53 1+6 31 '1.88 160.51 3.24 157.27 82.66 78.4e 1 5+1 6B 34 1.74 111.15 3.82 107.33 54.87 50.2t 10+1 1 41 '1.55 200.63 2.05 198.58 83.05 80.85 DMK.dlc Page 1 los amigos #1502.x|s Drainaoe Element Worksheet DRAINAGE ELEMENT 1 2 3 3A 4 5 5A 5B 6 7 I I 10 11 12 13A 138 14 15 16A 168 17 18 19 BASIN 1 2 2,3,38,4 3A 4 5A,5B,5C 5A 5B 1,6 7 I I '10,1 1 11 12 13A 138 14 1 5,1 68 16A 168 17 18 19 DESCRIPTION 24'CMP 24'CMP 36'CMP 18'CMP 18'CMP 36'CMP 18" CMP 24'CMP 48" CMP 18" CMP 30" cMP 1g'cMP 4E'CMP 24'CMP 30'cMP 24" CMP 24'CMP 54'CMP 42'CMP 24'CMP 30" cMP 30" cMP 18'CMP 24" CMP * All culverts were calculated using inlet contror with Hw/d < 1.S Pipe is assumed to be Helical com:gated Metal pipe, with metalend sections. Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545t 19Executed: 11:43:58 11-13-L996 LOSAIIfI.TCT SUMI{ARY SHEET FOR Tc or Tt COMPUTATIONS(Solved for Tine using TR-55 Methods) LOS AI.IIGOS Subarea descr. Tc or Tt lime (hrs) Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Basin Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 t0 11 L2 13 14 15 16 77 0.35 0.45 0.49 0.31 o.4L o.52 0.43 0.36 0.31 0.69 o.44 o .47 o.41 0.83 o.57 o .44 o .34 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N: L24O545119Executed: 1L:43:58 t L-13-1996 LOSA]IIl.TCT LOS AMIGOS TC COMPUTATTONS FOR: Basin J. SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment fDSurface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 . OO7 * (n*L) m_l._ 0.5 0.4 P2*S SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Paved Csf : 2O.32Bz T:L/(3600'tV) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, r = a/Pw Channel sIope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n Flow length, L (total < or = 3OO) ft 3OO.O 1 RANGE 0.1300 in L.300ft/ft o. r.330 hrs 0.26 2 Unpavedft 900.0ft/fE o. osso ft/s 3.7839 hrs A.O7 ditch ft L6.94ft o.472ft /ft o. o4so 0.0330 = O.26 : 0.07 Cross Sectional Flow Area, a sq.ft 8.00 2/3 L/2 L.49 * r :b g \,I =ft /s 5.808s n FIow length, L ft 541 T=L/ (3600*V) hrs o.O3 = 0.03 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::3::::::::::::::: TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.35 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:I240545119-xecuted: 1l-: 43 : 58 1t--13-199G LOSA],II1 . TCT LOS AMIGOS TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 2 SHEET FLOW (Applicab1e to Tc only) Segrment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Trrro-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8.007 * (n*L) m_l._ 0.5 0 .4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOt^i Segment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, LWatercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345. Paved Csf : 20.3292 T=L/(3500:tV) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment ID Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, | = a/Pw Channel slope, s l,{anning's roughness coeff ., n 2/3 L/2 L.49 :t ; :k g t7 - n FIow length, L T=L/(3600*v) 1 range 0. L300 in l-.300ft/ft o. r.330 hrs 0.26 2 Unpavedft 900.0fE/ft o. o44o ft/s 3.3844 hrs O.O7 ditch f t L6.94 ft o.472 ft/fE 0.0300 0.0330 ft/s 4.7 426 ft 2065 hrs O.1,2 FIow length, L (total < or = 3OO) ft 3OO.O Cross Sectional Flow Area, a sq.ft 8.00 = O.26 = 0.07 : 0.12 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.45 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43Ixecuted: 11:43:58 Tc SHEET FLOW (Applicab1e Segrment ID Surface description S/N:12405451191I-L3-L996 LOSAI,{rl".TCT LOS AMIGOS COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin to Tc only) Manning,s roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (total < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n*L) m_L- 1 range 0. L300ft 300.0in L.300fE/ft o. 0670 hrs 0.34 ftft /tt ft /s 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 hrs 0.00 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrnent IDSurface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, LWatercourse s1ope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf : Paved Csf = T=L/(3600:rv) 16. I345 20.3282 = 0.34 = 0.00 CHANNEL FLOW Segrment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, | = a/pwChannel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2L.49 * r :r g \,I : n FIow length, L T : L / (3600*V) sq. ftftftfL/ft ft/s ft hrs ditch 8.00 L6.94 4.472 0.0s40 0.0330 6.3629 3561 0.16 TOTAL = 0.15 0.49 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 'xecuted: 11:43:58 Avg.V --where: A:L/ S/N:124054511-9 l1-13-L996 LOSA]IIl.TCT LOS AMIGOS ft fE/fE ft/s TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BaSin SHEET FLOW (Applicable to fc only) Segmrent ID LSurface description rangeManning's roughness coeff., n O.I-3OOFlow length, L (total < or : 3OO) ft 3OO.OTwo-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in L.300Land slope, s ft/ft O.L170 0.8.007 * (n*L) m-hrs o.27 0. 5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONEENTRATED FLOW Segment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, L Watercourse s1ope, s 0.5 2 Unpaved 500.0 0.1000 5.LO22 hrs 0.03 csf * (s) Unpaved Csf = 16.L345Paved Csf = 20.3282 ( 3600'kV) = O.27 = 0.03 0.01 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, r : a/Pw Channel s1ope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2 1.49 * I :l g $= sq. ftftftfE/tt ditch 4.50 L2.7L 0.354 0.0387 0.0330 Flow length, L T : L / (3500*V) :::::::::::::::::::::::: fL/s ft hrs 4 .4458 L87 0.01- TOTAL TIME (hrs)0.31 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43cxecuted: 11:43 :58 S/N: r240545119 1t-13-1995 LOSAMI]" . TCT LOS A],IIGOS range 3oo) ftinft/fE hrs TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 5 SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segrnent ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-l:lr rainfaII, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8.007 * ( n:tl,) m_I_0.5 0.4 P2:tg SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s o.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf : Paved Csf : T = L / (3600*V) 16.1345 20.3282 2 Unpavedft 800.0 fE/ft o. o5oo ft/s 3 .6078 hrs 0.06 0.1300 300.0 1.300 0.1000 o.29 swale 8.00 L9.94 0.401 0.0870 0.0350 1500 0.06 : O.29 : 0.06 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radiust r: a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2L.49 * s :t g t, _ n Flow length, L T = L / (3600*V) sq. ftftftft/f t ft hrs fE/s 6.8301 TOTAL 0.06 Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: BASiN 6 SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segrnent ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Flow length, L (total < or : 300)Two-yr 24-}:r rainfall, P2 Land slope, s 0.8 .007 ,r (n*L) Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 "xecuted: 11:43:58 S,/N:124054511-9 1"1-13-1996 LOSAMTl . tCT LOS A],IIGOS range ftin ft/ft hrs ftfE/ft ft/s hrs sq. ftftftfE/ft fL/s ft hrs o.l-300 300.0 L.300 0.0800 0.32m- 0.5 0.4P2*S SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf : L6.1345Paved Csf = 20.3282 T=L/(3600,tV) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, T: a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * r :k s \,I = n Flow length, L T = L / (3500*V) 2 Unpaved 1700.0 0.0710 4 .2992 0.32 = 0.110.11 swale 12.00 24 .65 o .487 o.0750 0.0350 7.2529 2500 0. L0 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.10 I Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43-xecuted: 11:43:58 S/N: L24O545IL9 L1-13-L996 LOSAMIl.TCT LOS AMIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n FIow length, L (tota1 < or : 300) Two-yr 24-I:^r rainfall, P2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .007 * (n:rl,) m_l_- L range 0. L300ft 300.0in 1.300fl/ft 0.0500 hrs 0.38 ftfE/tt ft/s 2 Unpaved l-50.0 0.0670 4.L763 hrs 0.01 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse slope, s o.5 Avg.V = Csf * (s) where: Unpaved CsfPaved Csf T : L / (3600*v) 16. L345 20.3282 = 0.38 = 0.0L = 0.04 CHANNEL FLOW Segi"ment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, Pw Hydraulic radius, Y = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 1/2 l_.49 :h r * gv- n Flow length, L T=L/(3600*V) sq. ftftftft/f.t fE/s ft hrs ditch 4.50 L2.71 0.354 0.0123 0.0330 2.5064 350 0.04 ToTAL TIME (hrs) 0.43 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119-xecuted:11:43:58 fl-l3-1996 LOSAMI1.TCT LOS AI'{IGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 8 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-}:^r rainfa11, p2 Land slope, s 0.8.007 * (n*L) 0.5 0 .4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, LWatercourse s1ope, s 0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.L345Paved Csf = 20.3282 T = L / (3600*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segment fD Hydraulic radius, r = a/pwChannel s1ope, sManning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2l-.49 * r * g $: n Flow length, L T : L / (3600*V) L range 0.1300 in L.300ft/ft 0.1170 hrs O.27 2 Unpavedft 1000.0ft/ft 0.0500 fE/s 3.9521- hrs O.O7 swale ft 0.386ft /fE o. o57o 0.0350 ft/s 5.8448 ft 300 hrs 0.01 Flow length, L (total < or : 300) ft 3OO.O Cross Sectional FIow Area, a sq.ft G.OoWetted perimeter, Pw ft 15.53 = O.27 : 0.07 = 0.01- TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.36 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119 xecuted:11:43:58 1L-13-1995 LOSAMII.TCT LOS AI,IIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: BasiN SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segrment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Flow length, L (total < or : 300) Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 Land slope, s 0.8 .007 * (n*L) m-I_ 0. 5 0.4 P2*g SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s)where, H:#x.u ::f : 13..*22 T : L / (36OO,rV) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, a Wetted perimeter, Pw Hydraulic radiusr E = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2t.49 * s * g \,7 = _;______ Flow length, L T = L / (3500*V) 1 range 0. L300ft 300.0 in 1.300fl/fE o.l-o0o hrs O.29 ft 0.0 ft /fl 0. oo0o ft /s o. 0000 hrs o.00 = O.29 o. o0 sq. ftftftft/ft fE/s ft hrs swale 2.00 L.92 L.O42 0.0500 0.0350 9.78L9 600 0.02 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.02 0.3r Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N zLZ4O5451L9 , -xecuted: 11:43:58 .. tl-L3-1996 LOSAMIT.TCT LOS AI,IIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 10 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-br rainfall, p2 Land s1ope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n*L) m_J--0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)? F'Iow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf : l-6.1_345Paved Csf : 2O.3Zgz T:L/(3600*V) CHANNEL FLOT^] Segrment ID Hydraulic radius, t: a/Pw Channel slope, sManning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2 L.49 * ; :k gv- n FIow length, L T = L / (3600*V) t range 0. L300 in L.300fE/fE 0.0s30 hrs O.37 2 Unpavedft 2000.0ft /ft o. osoo fE/s 3.60.78 hrs O. L5 swale ft 0.685ft /fL 0. o4s0 o.0350 ft/s 7.oL94 ft 4200 hrs O.l7 Cross Sectionat Flow Area, a sq. f t l_4 . OOWetted perimeter, Pw ft 20.43 = 0.37 = 0.L5 = 0.17 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.69 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43-xecuted: 1l_:55: 18 S/N:12405451I9 11-13-1996 LOSAltr2.TCT SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment IDSurface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-}:rr rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n*L) m- 0.5 0.4 P2 Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin L1 range 3oo) ftinft/f E hrs FLOW 0.1300 300.0 1.300 0.0670 0.34 = 0.34 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED Segment ID Surface (paved orFIow length, LWatercourse slope, unpaved) ? S 0.5(s) Csf = L6.1345Csf : 20.3282 Area, a/Pw ,n 2 Unpaved ft 1500.0tt/tt o. o7s0 fE/s 4.4L86 hrs 0.10 Avg. V : where: T=L/ CHANNEL FLOW Csf * Unpaved Paved ( 3600*v) Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Wetted peri-meter, pw Hydraulic radius, y =Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff . 2/3 L/2 1.49 $: Flow m-il-L sq. ftftftft/fE ft hrs 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.00 ft/s 0.0000 0.10 0.00 n length, L / ( 36oo'tv) TIME (hrs) 0.44 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119-xecuted: L1:55:18 tt-I3-1996 LOSAMI2.TCT TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BASiN L2 SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segirnent ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfaIl, P2 Land slope, s 0.8 .007 * (n*L) m-l-- L range 0. L300 ft 300.0 in 1.300 ft/fE 0.0570 hrs 0.34 ftft/ft fE/s 2 Unpaved L450.0 0.0550 3.7839 hrs 0.1L 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s o.5 Avg.V = Csf * (s )where: Unpaved Csf : Paved Csf = T = L / (3500'hV) 15.1345 20.3282 = 0.34 0.11 CHANNEL FLOW Segirnent ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, r: a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 t/2 n FIow length, L T = L / (3600*V) sq. ftftft fE/fE swale 6.00 l-5.53 0.386 0.0700 0.0350 fE/s ft hrs 5 .97 42 500 o.02 TOTAL TIME (hrs) l-.49 * r * g 0.02 V_ Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N: L24O54511-9-xecuted: 1l:55:18 l-t-13-I995 LOSAMI2.TCT Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: BasiN ].3 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segrnent ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-}:r rainfall, P2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .007 * (n:rl.) 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5 Avg.V : Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf = l-5.1345Paved Csf = 20.3282 T:L/(3600*v) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment fD Cross Sectional Flow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, t: a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * r :k 5\/ :Y-n FIow m_I_ l- range 0.1300ft 300.0 in L.300fE/ft 0.0670 hrs 0.34 2 Unpaved ft L000.0fE/ft o.0600 ft/s 3.952t hrs 0.07 0.34 = 0.07 0.00 length, L L / ( 3600'r'V) sq. ftftftft/fE ft/s ft hrs 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.00 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.41 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119-xecuted: 1l-:55:L8 11-13-L995 LOSAMI2.TCT TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BAsiN ].4 SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segrment ID 1 Surface description rangeManning's roughness coeff., n 0.L300 Flow length, L (total < or = 300) ft 300.0 TVo-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in L.300 Land slope, s ft/fL 0.0500 0.8 .007 * (n*L) m-hrs 0.380.5 0.4 P2*S SHALLOT^I CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse sIope, s 0.5 Avg.V = Csf ,r (s )where' H:Y:x"" ::i = ,l'.',;tz T = L / (3600*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radiust t = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n . 2/3 1/2L.49 * r * g tt _fE/s ft hrs 5.3239 6600 0.34 n Flow length, L T = L / (3600'rV) 2 Unpaved ft 1350.0ft/ft o.0s2o fE/s 3.6792 hrs 0.10 = 0.38 = 0.l-0 = 0.34 sq. ftftft ft /fE swale 24.OO 33.09 o.725 0.0240 0.0350 :::::::::::::::::::::::: ToTAL TIME (hrs) Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:124O54s119-xecuted: ll :55 : 18 f 1-13-l-996 LOSAMI2. TCT TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BasiN 15 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 Land s1ope, s 0.8.007 * ( n:rl,) m-I_ 0.5 0.4 P2*g SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5 Avg.V : Csf * (s)where' HIY:x'u 3:l = :3 .\"tz T = L / (3600*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radiust t = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * s * g V_ Flow m_l._ L range 0.1300ft 300.0 in 1.300ft /fE o.0soo hrs 0.38 2 Unpavedft 2500.0 ft /ft 0.0680 fl/s 4 .2O7 4 hrs o.L7 : 0.38 = 0.L7 = 0.02 Iength, L L / ( 3600:kV) sq. ftftfttE/tL fl/s ft hrs SWALE 8.00 12.94 0.6r8 0.0400 0.0330 6.5520 500 0.02 (hrs) 0.57TOTAL Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119-xecuted: L1: 55 : 18 1L-l-3-1995 LOSAMI2 . TCT TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BasiN 16 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Hanning's roughness coeff., n Flow length, L (totaI < or = 300)Tvo-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 Land slope, s 0.8.007 * (n*L) m-J-- 1 range 0.1300 ft 300.0 in L.300 ft/fL 0.0670 hrs 0.34 ftft/ft fE/s 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 hrs 0.00 0.5 0.4 P2*5 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse s1ope, s o.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf =Paved Csf = T=L/(3600*v) 15.1345 20.3282 = 0.34 = 0.00 0. L0 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, | = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2 L.49 * ; Jr g $= Flow I- Iength, L L / ( 3600*v) sq. ftftftfL/fE fl/s ft hrs ditch 8.00 16.94 o.472 0.0350 0.0330 5.L226 L797 0. L0 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.44 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N: t24O545119r' -xecuted: 11:55:18 l1-13-199G LOSAI"II2.TCT TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin L7 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Te only) Segrment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr'24-hr rainfalI, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .007 * (n*L) 0.5 0.4 P2*S SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segnent ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Plow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5 Avg.V= Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf : 1-6.L345 Paved Csf = 20.3282 A=L/(3600,tV) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID 1 range c. t-300 in L.300fE/ft o. r.330 hrs A.26 ft 0.0fE/fL 0.0000 fl/s 0.0000 hrs 0.00 ditch = 0.26 = 0.00 Cross Sectional Flow Area, a sq.ft 4.50Wetted perimeter, Pw ft L2.7LHydraulic radius, r = a/pw ft 0.354 Channel slope, s fE/fL O.O42OManning's roughness coeff., n O.O33O 2/3 t/2 L.49 Jr g :l g lt -ft /s 4.63L4 n Flow length, L ft L427 T=L/ (3600*V) hrs O.O9 = 0.09 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.34 LOS AI,IIGOS RAI,{CH PUI) PRELIMINARY PLAT, FILINGS 6-10 WATBR SYSTEM CALCULATIONS JUNE 1999 Prepared by: Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. 118 West 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 970/945-1004 cover/1 502c1 9.wsc Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Junction Report Node Elevation (ft) Demand (spm) P (psi) P Head (fi) HGL (Calc) (ft) Zone J-1 J-100 J-110 J-120 J-'t 30 J-1 40 J-'150 J-1 60 J-170 J-1 80 J-200 J-210 J-220 J-230 J-240 J-250 J-3oO J-320 J-330 J-340 J-350 J-360 J-370 J-380 J-390 J-400 J-410 J-420 J-430 J-440 J-450 J-460 J470 J-480 J-490 J-500 J-5'lO J-520 J-530 J-540 J-550 J-560 J-570 J-580 J-590 J-600 J-610 J-620 J-630 J-640 J-650 7,116.00 6,908.OO 6,929.OO 6,902.OO 6,892.OO 6,872.OO 6,864.00 6,810.00 6,805.00 6,740.OO 6,804.OO 6,736.OO 6,535.00 6,738.OO 6,586.OO 6,903.OO 6,902.OO 6,350.00 6,380.00 6,325.00 6,280.00 6,245.00 6,260.00 6,230.OO 6,225.00 7,176.00 7,175.00 7,O90.OO 7,O80.OO 7,O90.00 7,040.oo 7,040.00 6,940.OO 6,940.00 6,980.00 6,995.00 7,095.00 7,O73.OO 7,100.oo 6,905.OO 6,900.00 6,890.00 6,970.00 6,890.00 6,965.00 6,900.oo 6,975.OO 6,940.00 6,965.OO 7,010.00 7,O50.OO o.oo I e.zo I lo.oo l o.oo 29.16 6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20 0.00 6.20 6.20 0.00 6.20 6.20 o.oo o.oo 0.00 0.00 15.56 16.52 20.40 7.76 6.80 9.72 o.oo 4.88 2.92 4.88 4.88 4.88 8.76 13.60 9.72 6.80 3.88 16.52 11.68 5.84 2.92 3.88 '10.68 5.84 't3.60 6.80 15.56 5.84 11.68 4.88 11.68 16.52 27.76 117.53 108.54 120.16 51 .O5 59.67 63.24 86.63 88.60 116.69 89.16 118.60 108.7',! 117.74 140.27 119.80 120.24 98.40 175.78 109.13 128.58 143.72 137.24 150.23 152.39 2.14 2.50 39.20 43.53 39.20 60.86 60.54 't03.83 '103.90 86.59 80.09 36.83 46.37 34.70 119.O7 121.23 125.57 90.90 125.58 93.08 121.31 88.81 104.08 93.25 73.87 56.63 64.O7 271.25 250.49 277.31 't17.82 137.71 145.95 199.94 204.47 269.30 205.77 273.72 250.88 271.72 323.72 276.49 277.49 227.10 405_69 25't.85 296.74 331 .69 316.74 346.71 351.71 4.93 5.78 90.47 100.46 90.46 140.46 139.72 23€.62 23,9.79 199.83 184.83 85.00 107.O1 80.07 274.79 279.79 289.79 209,78 289.83 214.82 279.97 2o,4.97 240.21 215.20 170.47 130.68 7 1ao.o7 7,'t7g.25 7,179.49 7,',t79.31 7,009.82 7,009.71 7,009.95 7,009.94 7,OO9.47 7,0O9.30 7,OO9.77 7,@9.72 6,785.88 7,OO9.72 7,OO9.72 7,179.49 7,179.49 6,577.10 6,785.69 6,576.85 6,576.74 6,576.69 6,576.74 6,576.71 6,576.71 7,180.93 7,180.78 7lao.47 7,180.46 7,180.46 7,180.46 7,179.72 7,179.62 7,179.79 7,'t79.A3 7,179.83 7,180.00 7,180.0'l 7,180.07 7,179.79 7,179.79 7,179.79 7,179.78 7,179.83 7,179.82 7,179.97 7,'179.97 7,180.21 7,180.20 7,180.47 7,180.68 Zone-1 1 1 1 1 1 ,| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Title: LOS AMIGOS c:\winnt\profi les\dkotz\desktop\3la6-99.wcd 06/23199 11:33:19 AM @ Haestad Methods, lnc. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: DAVID M. KOTZ Cybemet v3.1 [071] Page 1 ol2 Node Elevation (fr) Demand (spm) P (psi) P Head (n) HGL (Calc) (ft) Zone J-660 J-670 7,'to5.oo 6,870.00 0.oo 0.00 32.87 134.36 75.86 310.09 7,180.86 7,180.09 I 1 'l-itl€: LOS AMIGOS c:\winnt\proliles\dkotz\deskto p\3|a6-99.wcd 06/23199 1 1:33:19 AM @ Haestad Methods, lnc. Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Junction Report SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 37 Brookside Road \ latorbury, CT 06708 USA Projoct Engineor: OAVID M. KOTZ Cybernet v3.1 [O711 (2O3) 7ss-1 666 Page 2 of 2 Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length (fi) D (in) Rough Minor Loss a (spm) Velocity (fl/s) HL (ft) Sf (fl/1 oooft) o/c Status P-1 P-2 P-3 P-140 P-150 P-160 P-170 P-180 P-190 P-200 P-220 P-230 P-240 P-250 P-260 P-270 P-310 P-310a P-320 P-32Oa P-360 P-370 P-380 P-410 P-420 P440 P-450 P-460 P-470 P-480 P-490 P-500 P-siO P-520 P-530 P-540 P-550 P-560 P-570 P-580 P-590 P-600 P610 P€20 P€30 P-640 P€5O P-660 P-670 P-700 P-710 P-720 604.OO 432.OO 1,552.OO 483.00 1,121 .@ 867.OO 749.OO 1,451 .OO 1,241 .OO 919.OO 1,145.OO 1,134.00 365.00 1,052.00 321 .OO 602.00 121.OO 121.00 't90.oo 190.OO 370.00 473.OO 1,?22.@ 433.OO 1,O21 .OO 380.00 826.OO 994.00 337.OO 1,216.00 935.OO 614.OO 6't8.OO s2.oo] 48s.oo I I 1 ,137.oo I 6s3.oo I 5't4.OO I 412.@l 6s5.oo I $2.ool 1,s26.oo I 662 00 I 1,687.00 I 842 oo I ,oo *l 2,361 .OO I soo.oo I 3,O75.OO I1,659.00I 441.0o I 7s4.oo I I I 6 8 I 8 b b 6 I 6 6 6 .8 6 6 6 b 6 6 24 8 6 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 "l6l el ,ol 'to I 101 al rl "l.l "l.l "l "l.l "lul 135.O 135.0 130.0 135.0 135 0 135.O 135.0 't35.O 135.O 135.0 135.0 135.O 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.O 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.O 13s.0 ] 't au.o I r.s.o I I135.o I 135.0 | r es.o I 't au.o I , au.o I ''.= o I 't au.o I 'tau ol , au.o I 135.O I ', au.o I ',au ol , au.o I 't au.o I ,au ol ',a, oI ,au.o I ''.u.0I 13s.0I 13s.0I 'l .50 1.50 0.00 10.50 1.50 1,50 1.50 1.50 1.50 10.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 o.75 0.75 o.75 o.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 , o.uo I I 1.50I , uol 1.so I ,.uo I ''.uo I 't.uo I 't.uo I,.*l't.-l ,.uo I , uol 't.uo I ''.uo I , uol ,.uo I ,.uo I 't uol ,o*l , aol 't.uo I 1.so I ',.*l , -ol ,.uo I ,.*l ,.uo l ',.u0 | -64.59 5.84 70.43 -97.96 97.96 -68.80 45.16 6.20 41.31 -76.76 -20.36 18.60 57.56 76.76 -6.20 6.20 O.24e-2 O.24e-2 O.2e-2 O.2e-2 0.36e-2 O.44e-2 41.65 2".r") 2".r") zu.z. I ,t.rol ,o.ool -a't"l -rr.o"l , a.ur l o.rrl-.*l ,aa.uu I 't na.rr l ,u.rol 'to"ol o.r.l o.r" I , ro.ar l s7.s7l 0...o I aa.ra l -r".o" I -nr.a" I g... I -sz.oa I -'t uu.oa l -a.nr l ,.ua l 3.881 -o.zrl 0.41 0.04 0.80 0.63 0.63 o.44 o.5'1 0.o7 o.47 o.49 o.23 o.21 0.65 0.49 0.07 0.07 O.27e-4 O.27e4 O.23e4 0.23e-4 0.26e-5 O.2ae4 o.47 0.49 o.49 o.87 0.38 o.23 0.04 0.31 o.19 o.06 o.06 1.O8 Io.7s l o.z7l o.on I I 0.o31 0.06l r.os I 0...1 o"'tl o.rrl o..l o.ru I oool o.rr l o nnl o.ou I o.or l o.oo I o.o.l o.07 0.49e-3 0.85 0.18 o.27 o.11 o.18 0.01 o.24 o.18 0.06 o.05 o.14 0.16 O.2e-2 0.39e-2 0.00 o.00 o.oo o.oo 0.oo o.oo o.24) Io.07 |o.19 t o rul Io.11 I o.o5l o.aee-31 o r't I o.o.l o.2ae-2]| o.2ae-21 oorl o.'tu I o.a, I o.aee-21 o.ase-31 0.15e-21 o.4s l o ral o.'' o I o arl o.rrl o ool o.ase-3 I o rrl o rnl o.o't I o.ase-31 o.15e-21 o.ase-3 | 0.11 O.11e-2 0.55 0.36 o.24 0.13 o.23 o.01 o.20 0.19 0.05 o.04 o.38 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 o.oo o.oo o.00 o.00 0.20 o.16 o.19 o.65 o.14 0.05 O.14e-2 o.09 o.04 o.ae-z] o.ae-zl o.7s l o.a, I 0.281 oorl o.ese-31 o.3oe-21 o 6el o.24l| o o"l o u"l o.rolo*l O.'tae-Zl o orl o.ur I o.2se-2]l o.2se-31 0.33e-21 o.o5e-s I I open I on"n I Open I op"n I oo"n I op"n I oo"n I Open I op"n I op"n I op"n I op"n I op"n I on"n I oRen I onen I onen I ooen Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open 'l-itle: LOS AMIGOS project Engineer: DAVID M. KOTZc:\winnt\profiles\dkoE\desktopBla6-99.wcd SCHMUESER GoRDoN MEYER cybernet v3.1 [071]06/23/99 1 1 :33:4O AM @ Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road Wbterbury, CT 0670g USA (203) 755-1666 page 1 of 2 Link Length (n) D (in) Rough Minor Loss o Gpm) Velocity (ff/s) HL (1r) sf (fl/1oooft) otc Status P-730 P-740 P-750 P-760 P-770 P-780 P-790 P-800 P-810 P-820 P-830 P-840 P-850 P-880 P-890 P-900 P-910 1,463.00 2,737.OO 1,093.OO 3,074.00 997.00 1,156.00 51 1.00 1,656.00 1,968.00 2,406.OO 617_OO 451.OO 1,161 .00 1.OO 1.00 1.OO 1.00 6 I 6 I 6 8 6 I 8 6 8 8 8 8 I 8 6 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.O 135.0 135.0 135.O 135.O 135.O 135.0 135.0 135.0 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.s0 1.50 "t .50 1.50 1.50 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.84 -20.74 6.80 41.14 5.84 -62.54 4.88 -79.10 €3.82 26.96 -107.30 -107.30 62.54 76.76 76.76 97.96 57.56 o.07 o.13 0.08 0.26 0.07 0.40 0.06 0.50 0.41 0.31 0.68 0.68 0.40 o.49 0.49 0.63 0.65 o.01 o.04 0.01 0.15 0.49e-2 0.12 O.2e-2 o.27 o.2'l o.21 0.18 o.14 o.12 o.00 0.00 o.00 0.49e-3 0.ol 0.ol 0.01 0.05 O.49e-2 0.10 O.38e-2 o.16 o.11 o.09 o.29 o.30 0.10 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.49 Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Title: LOS AMIGOS Project Engineer: DAVID M. KOTZ c:\winnt\proflles\dkotz\desktopBla6-99.wcd SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER Cybernet v3.1 [071] 06/23199 11:33:4OAM @HaestadMethods, lnc. 3TBrooksideRoad Waterbury,CT06708USA (2O3)755-1666 Page2ot2 Scenario: Base Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Repod Node Label Zone Needed Fire Flow (spm) Total Needed Flow (spm) Satis{ies Fire Flow Constraints Available Fire Flow (spm) Calculated Residual Pressure (psi) Calculated Minimum Zone Pressure (psi) Minimum Zone Junction I J-100 I .,-, ''o L.,ro l r-,.o | ,-'' oo L-''uo L-r"o l r-,ro L-''ro 1.,-roo I I J-210 I J-220 I I J-23o J-240 J-320 J-330 J-340 J-350 J-360 J-370 J-380 J-390 J-420 J-430 J-440 J-450 J-460 J-470 J-480 J-490 J-500 J-510 J-520 J-530 J-540 J-550 J-560 J-570 J-580 J-590 J-600 J-610 J-620 J-630 J-640 J-650 J-670 T-1 T-4 1 1 1 1 'l 1 ,| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,| 1 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.oo 500.00 500.00 500.o0 500.00 500.00 500.oo 500.00 500.oo 500.o0 500.o0 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.o0 500.oo 500.oo 500.oo 500.00 500.oo 500.oo 500.oo 5oo.oo 500.oo soo.oo ] I 50o.o0 i 500.00 I soo.oo I u* *l 500 00 I soo.oo I uoo *l 5oo.oo Iu*.*l soo ool 5oo.oo I soo oo I soo.oo I soo oo I soo.oo I soo.oo I u* *l soo.oo I soo.oo I 506.20 500.00 500.00 529.16 506.20 506.20 506.20 506.20 500.00 506.20 506.20 500.00 506.20 506.20 500.00 500.00l 51s.s6 | 516 s2l 520.40I 507.76l| 506.80I 50e 72 I 5o2.e2l so4 88 I uoo."" I so4.88l ao".r" I 513.60I 5os.72l 506.80I 503.88 | 516.s21 ur r.a" I 505.841 uorn l 503.881 u, o."" I uoa rol ur a.ao I u*.rol sr s.so I uou ,o I urr.*l uo, "" I u, ,."" I s16.s2l '**l true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true I 1,000.oo 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.oo 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,OOO.00 1,000.00 1,OOO.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 't,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 ] l,OOO.OO I1,000.00I r,ooo.oo I l,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I r,ooo.oo I 1,000.001 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I I,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OOl gez.ez I l,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1.ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I l,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I,''*"*l I 70.10 89.71 93.68 44.54 50.04 55.81 33.65 66.75 83.76 76.08 57.71 99.34 67.95 70.41 94.27 154.47 90.46 99.27 81 .g7 107.1g 8e.7e l I86.38 | 34.751 33.68 | zs.oe I 37.16 I so.34l 88.eo I s1 2sl 73.561 s5.30I 25.581 .noul 20.oo I rcz.441 8s.so I 107.ss l 27.o21 10s 2el 38.10I $22o1 38.00 |48.62 | 60.e31 ". o.l 4e831 ,,artl I 19.95 't 9.95 't9.95 19.95 19.95 't 9.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 't9.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.S5 19.95 't 9.95 1s.ss ] 1e.ss l I1e.ss I19.95 I 'tn nul 1e s5l 1es5l lsssl 1e.ss l 1e.ss l 1s.esl 1s.s5 | r s.ss I 1s.ssl 1e.ss l 1essl , n.nu I 1e esl 1s.ss l lessl 1e.esl 1e s5l 1e.ssl 1e.e5l ,n nul 1s ssl 1e.s5l IPRV-18o-Orjt I pnv-rso-or, I pnu-rro-or, lrRv-',ro-or, I I PRV-180-out IPRV-18O-Out lpn r-r.o-o* lpRv-reo-ou* I I PRV-180-out I PRV-18O-Out PRV-18O-OLII PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18o-Orrt PRV-18O-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-"t80-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-'l8O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-'l8O-Out lltle: LOS AMIGOS c:\win nt\proliles\dkotz\desktop\3la6-99.wcd 06/23199 1 1 :56:18 AM @ Haestad Methods, lnc. Project Enginoer: DAVTD M. KOTZ SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 37 Brooksido Road \Arlaterbury, CT 06708 USA (2O3) 755-1 666 Cybernet v3.1' [0711 Page 1 of2 I Scenario: EAST TANK ONLY (P850 CLOSED) Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Node Label Zone Needed Fire Flow (spm) Total Needed Flow (spm) Satisfes Flre Flow Constraints Available Fire Flow (spm) Calculated Residual Pressure (psi) Calculated Minimum Zone Pressure (psi) Minimum Zone Junction I J-1 lr-''* L-,,o L-'ro l r-,.0 I .,-',oo L-'to l r-,"o | .,-,zo I J-rao l r-r* lr-r,o I lr-22oJ-230 J-240 J-320 J-330 J-340 J-350 J-360 J-370 J-380 J-390 J-420 J-430 J-440 J-450 J-460 J-470 J-480 J-490 J-500 J-510 J-520 J-530 J-540 J-550 J-560 J-570 J-580 J-590 J600 J-610 J€2O J630 J€4O J-650 J-670 T-1 T-4 t; lr l1 l1 1 1 1 ,| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'l 1 500.oo 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.oo 500.00 500.oo 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.oo 500.oo 500.00 500.oo 500.00 ] uoo.oo I I5oo.oo I500.00I u* ool soo.oo I uoo*lu*.-l 5oo.oo I soo.oo I uoo.*l 5oo.oo I s*.*l u*.*ls*.*l u* *l u*.*l 5oo.ool soo ool u*.*l u*.*l u* *l s* *l uoo *l u*.*l u* *l u*.*l =* *l u* *l u*.*l '**l I s00.00 506.20 500.00 500.o0 529.16 506.20 506.20 506.20 506.20 soo.oo 506.20 506.20 500.oo 506.20 506.20 5oo.oo u*.*] uru u"l a',u.u, I uro.oo I uor.ra l u* rol son.rr l uor.n l uor."" I uoo."r l uoo "" I uoa.ru I u't a.ao I 50s.72]| u* "oluo...r I sr a.ur l u't't.ua l uou.ro I sor.n .l so..r" I u', o."" I u*.rol u't a.ao I uo" rol uru.uu I uou*l u't r.u" I uoo."" I s"..r I u't u.ur l '**l true true true true true true true true true true lrue true true true true true lrue true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true true I I 619.87 1,OOO.00 'l ,000.00 1,OO0.00 1,000.00 1,OO0.00 1,OOO.00 1,OOO.OO 1,000.00 'l ,000.oo 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.oo 1,000.oo ]'l ,000.00I r,ooo.oo I 1,000.001 1,000.00I 1,OOO.OO I 1.ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I 1,ooo.oo I r,*o.*l 826.6s 1 1,OOO.OO I 1,OOO.OO I 1,ooo.oo I aea 8o I l,o*.*l azs.sg I e5o.86l ,ra r', I 1,OOO.OO I r,ooo.oo I 1,OOO.OO I l,OOO.OO I*'*l 20.00 65.88 86.83 90.79 44.54 50.04 55.81 33.65 66.75 83.76 76.08 57.71 99.34 67.95 70.81 94.27 154.47 so.46 ]99.27 ) 81.s71 107.1s I 8s.7e l 86.381 ,r rrl ,r.uol 24.o41 aa.'t r l 47.45lI ro ""180.061 64141 4s.881 ,o orl .u."u I 20.00 I "o,, I 68.371 *-ral ,o *l 58.3s 1,o*l 37.50I ,o ool ,a.uo I ou.n, I s6.371 47.261 42.68 | 20.oo 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 19.95 't9.95 19_95 19.95 19.95 19.95 't 9.95 19.95 19.95 '19.95 19.95 1e.ss i 'tnnul l s.ss l 1s.ssl ', r.nu I 'tn n.l 1s.esl ''n nul 1s.ssl 1e.s5l lsesl 1e.ssl 1s.esl 't n."u I ,n nrl 1e.ssl''r.*l 'tn nul t e.ss l l s.ss l ',n nul 1s.e5lu*l 1e.ss l ,n nrl ,n nul ,n nul , n.nu I '*l I J-1 l r*u-r.o-or, IpRu-,ro-or, lpnu-,ro-ou, l r*u-rro-o* lpnv-,ro-o* lpRr-,ro-or, lpRv-',"o-or, I pRv-r.o-or, | "*t-r"o-or,lr*r-r"o-or, lpnu-rro-o* lt*r-rro-o* I pnr-,.o-or, lt*rr-rro-o* Itnv-',ro-o* lpnr-,*o* I IPRV-18Gout IPRV-180-Out lp*,r-',roo* I IPRV-18o-outPRV-l80-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out J-530 PRV-'l80-Orit PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18GOut PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-l80-Out PRV-18O-Out J-610 PRV-180-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out PRV-180-Out PRV-18O-Out J-610 ]-'itle: LOS AMIGOS project Engineer: DAVID M. KOTZc:\winnt\profiles\dkotz\desktopBla6-99.wcd scHMUEsER GoRDoN MEYER cybernet v3.1 [o71]06/23/99 12:15:49 PM @ Haestad Methods, lnc. 37 Brookside Road \,laterbury, CTO6TOB USA (203) 755-1666 page 1 of 2 I B(lI\ U)s\i I! t II F It Ihrr i*rr SIPI]IUI aretd) 'rul l^l9s 6661 i0 .zE .e\ te unf pa|!t 0up'66-9vtEldo11saglzlo)p\salIloJduNNI14\ .3 APPE,NDIX B Old Republic National Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Our Order No. GW231681 Schedule A Cust. Ref.: Property Address: 1. Effective Date: May 26, 1999 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: 'TBD'Commitment Proposed Insured: TBD 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: LOS AMIGOS RANCH PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 5- The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION Our Order No. GW23l68l IEGAt DESCBIPTI(lN THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO BE KNOWN AS FILINGS 6, 7, 8,9 AND IO LOS AMIGOS RANCH: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTIONS 3I, 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST, SECTIONS 5 AND 6, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST, SECTIONS 35 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST ALL OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT I8 OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE S 1 DEGREES 53'48' W 1239.92 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINES OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 18 AND 19 OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 46'13" W 404.81 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 399 AT PAGE 265 OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE S O DEGREES 01'13' E 820.48 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 399 AT PAGE 265; THENCE N 90 DEGREES 00'00' w 890.23 FEET; THENCE S 0 DEGREES 00'00' E 506.00 FEET; THENCE S 75 DEGREES 06's5' w 94.26 FEET; THENCE S 9 DEGREES 32'58. E222.22 FEET; THENCE S 47 DEGREES 32'07'W 282.42 FEET; THENCE S 52 DEGREES 30'32' W 203.24 FEET; THENCE S 52 DEGREES 30'32" W 206.00 FEET; THENCE N 51 DEGREES 01'17' W 294.42 FEET; THENCE 266.03 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 748.55 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20 DEGREES 2I' 46-, AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 31 DEGREES 47'14'W 264.63 FEET; THENCE S 21 DEGREES 36'21'W 29.67 FEET; THENCE 75.20 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.18 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 DEGREES 10'45" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 18 DEGREES 00'58" W 75.15 FEET; THENCE N 75 DEGREES34'24" W 60.00 FEET; THENCE 275.61FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 660.18 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 DEGREES 55'10" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 2 DEGREES 28'01" W 273.61FEET; THENCE S 9 DEGREES 29'34' E71.77 FEET; THENCE 93.II FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1216.02 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4 DEGREES 23'14", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 11 DEGREES 4l'll. E 93.09 FEET; THENCE 310.63 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4531.52 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 DEGREES 55'39" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 15 DEGREES 50'38" E 310.56 FEET; THENCE S 17 DEGREES 48'28" E 157.01 FEET; THENCE 143.59 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 514.80 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES 58' 51', AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 9 DEGREES 49'02' E 143.12 FEET; THENCE 75.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 209.07 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20 DEGREES 33'51', AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 8 DEGREES 27'19. W 74.64 FEET; THENCE S 86 DEGREES 53'07" W 197.30 FEET; THENCE S 62 DEGREES i8'30. W 471.73 FEET; THENCE N 70 DEGREES 27'09. W 601.07 FEET; THENCE S 65 DEGREES 34'38' w 174.11 FEET; THENCE S 64 DEGREES 06'04' W 285.93 FEET; THENCE S 86 DEGREES l8'00' W 238.66 FEET; THENCE S 0 DEGREES 3l'11' W 292.72 FEET; THENCE S 10 DEGREES 11'38' W 64.39 FEET; THENCE S 11 DEGREES 12'19" W 245.56 FEET; THENCE N 87 DEGREES 42'53'W 184.29 FEET; THENCE N 68 DEGREES 29'56" W 810.33 FEET; THENCE S 23 DEGREES 06'58" W 395.36 FEET; THENCE S 2 DEGREES 59'01" W 325.02 FEET; THENCE S 28 DEGREES 30'08. 8352.86 FEET; THENCE N 87 DEGREES 29'00" W 900.50 FEET; THENCE S 0 DEGREES 00'00' E 1240.48 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 114; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: 2OI,O2 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 445.0I FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 DEGREES 52'52" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 57 Our Order No. GW231681 tEGAt DESCBIPTI()N DEGREES 38'59" w 199.31 FEET; THENCE N 70 DEGREES 35'25" W 60.98 FEET; THENCE 334.21FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 376.30 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 DEGREES 53'12" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 83 DEGREES 57'59" W 323.33 FEET; THENCE S 58 DEGREES 3l'23" w 149.63 FEET; THENCE 306.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF T8I4.7I FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 DEGREES 39' 45" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 53 DEGREES 41'30' w 305.67 FEET; THENCE s 48 DEGREES 51'39' w 177 .60 FEET; THENCE 326.89 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 205.97 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 55' 55", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 85 DEGREES 40'24" W 293.64 FEET; THENCE N 40 DEGREES 12'26'W 790.78 FEET; THENCE N 39 DEGREES 40'44' w 1218.56 FEET; THENCE 328.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1265.07 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEGREES 5I' 43", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 47 DEGREES 06'35' w 327.23 FEET; THENCE N 0 DEGREES 00'00. E 2008.90 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE S 89 DEGREES IO'45- W 2646.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 52'30. w 553.90 FEET ALoNG SAID sourH LINE oF SAID SECTION 36 TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO 82; THENCE N 71 DEGREES 4O'OO- W 210.20 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4 OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE N O DEGREES 53'OO- E 4OI.I2 FEET TO THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 55'OO- W 936.02 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82; THENCE N 52 DEGREES 40'00' W 730.80 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE N 41 DEGREES 21'30" w 102.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT oF wAy LINE; THENCE N 52 DEGREES 40'00' W 275.33 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE N 4 DEGREES 34'OO" E 1608.11 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE N 88 DEGREES 15'14' W 2232.61FEET ALONG THE EAST - WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19 OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE N O DEGREES O8'OO" W 299.47 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 19; THENCE N 88 DEGREES O7'OO" W 264.12 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 19; THENCE N 6 DEGREES 06'46" 82593.28 FEET ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE S 86 DEGREES 19'00' 82448.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE S 86 DEGREES I9'OO, E 4897.20 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36; THENCE S 0 DEGREES 45'39 W 926.55 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 TO THE WEST I/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3l; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 33,12" F.3444.43 FEET ALONG THE EAST - WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 3I TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 3I; THENCE S 5 DEGREES 06'10'W 1305.89 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE DESCRIBED IN BOOK 613 AT PAGE 567 OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 43'23, 82769.40 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE DESCRIBED IN BOOK 613 AT PAGE 567 AND BOOK 614 AT PAGE 680; THENCE S 9 DEGREES S 03'54. W 1395.04 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE DESCRIBED IN BOOK 614 AT PAGE 680; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 43'26" E 1334.71FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A FENCE DESCRIBED IN BooK 614 AT PAGE 679; THENCE N 4 DEGREES z4'oz" 82t32.23 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE DESCRIBED IN BOOK 614 AT PAGE 679 AND BOOK 613 AT PAGE 569 AND BooK 613 AT PAGE 568; THENCE s 86 DEGREES l1'34" E 49.72 FEET ALONG THE soUTH LINE DESCRIBED IN BooK 613 AT PAGE 570; THENCE s 87 DEGREES t5'05' E 1379.32 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 7 AND LOT 18 OF SAID SECTION 33 FEET TO THE Our Order No. GW231681 LEGAT DESCRIPTION POINT OF BEGINNING. A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF LOS AMIGOS RANCH FILING NO. 5 WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE BEARS S 54 DEGREES 52'25" E 2460.04 FEET; THENCE S 36 DEGREES 34'44' W 300.19 FEET ALONG SAID BOUNDARY TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOS AMIGOS DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES:2t6.21FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 680.42 FEET A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEGREES 12'22", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 65 DEGREES 20'09' W 215.30 FEET; THENCE 493.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 429.60 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65 DEGREES 49' 54" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 4l DEGREES 31'23" w 466.89 FEET; THENCE N 8 DEGREES 36'26'w 186.44 FEET TO SAID BOUNDARY OF LOS AMIGOS RANCH FILING 5; THENCE S 80 DEGREES 48'37" E377.50 FEET ALONG SAID BOUNDARY; THENCE S 46 DEGREES 27'5.1. E 468.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE BEARS S 60 DEGREES 38'00' E 1067.14 FEET; THENCE S 32 DEGREES 07'00" W 1095.76 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOS AMIGOS DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: N 66 DEGREES 16'26" W II7.O3 FEET; THENCE 228,88 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.10 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 55'08" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 57 DEGREES 48'52" W 228.05 FEET; THENCE 92.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 12O.OO FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44 DEGREES 09' 39" AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 27 DEGREES 16'28" W 9O.22FEET; THENCE 128.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 477 .49 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES 21' 40-, AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 2 DEGREES 29'tl" E 127.63 FEET; THENCE 233.88 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 695.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 DEGREES 16' 52", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N O DEGREES 31'34' 8232.78 FEET; THENCE N 9 DEGREES 06's2' w 428.92 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT oF wAY LINE oN A couRSE BEARING N 73 DEGREES 35'42. E 45.58 FEET; THENCE s t5 DEGREES 30'40. E 389.18 FEET; THENCE N 72 DEGREES 4t'46'E 501.54 FEET; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 05'04' 8339.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT (Requirements) Our Order No. GW23l68l The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW231681 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. 8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 9, THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 10. WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. 11. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 1911, IN BOOK 71 AT PAGE 523, RECORDED JULY 3,1923IN BOOK I12 AT PAGE 568, RECORDED NOVEMBER 1I, 1916 IN BOOK 92 AT PAGE 297, RECORDED JANUARY 22,1936IN BOOK 172 AT PAGE 576 AND RECORDED JULY 8, 1927 IN BOOK 7I AT PAGE 632 12. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED AUGUST 04, 1920, IN BOOK 112 AT PAGE 352, RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1965 IN BOOK 370 AT PAGE 462, RECORDED JULY 24,1917 IN BOOK 92 AT PAGE 306, RECORDED JANUARY 9, L936IN BOOK 172 AT PAGE 57I AND RECORDED DECEMBER 9,1952IN BOOK 267 AT PAGE 129 ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions)Our Order No. GW23l68l The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 13. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1956, IN BOOK 291 AT PAGE 155 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1952IN BOOK 263 AT PAGE 169 14. 'EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1,1946 (60 STAT. 755), ALL URANIUM, THORIUM OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AT THE TIME TO ENTER UPON THE LAND AND PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE THE SAME.' AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 9,1952IN BOOK 267 AT PAGE I29. 15. 'EXCEPTING AND RESERVED, HOWEVER TO THE UNITED STATES ALL THE COAL AND OTHER MINERALS IN THE LANDS SO ENTERED AND PATENTED, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE THE SAME PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE ACT OF DECEMBER 29, 1916 (I9 STAT. 862)", AS RESERVED rN PATENT RECORDED JANUARY 9, t936IN BOOK 172 AT PAGE 571. 16. "EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES ALL THE OIL AND GAS IN THE LAND SO PATENTED, AND TO IT OR PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY IT, THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE SUCH DEPOSITS FROM THE SAME UPON COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE ACT OF JULY 17,1914 (38 STAT. 509)" AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1965IN BOOK 370 AT PAGE 462. 17. 'EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES ALL THE POTASSIUM AS TO THE LANDS IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST, AND TO IT OR PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY IT, THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SUCH DEPOSITS FROM THE SAME UPON COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE ACT OF JULY 17,I9I4 (38 STAT. 509)", AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1965 IN BOOK 370 AT PAGE 462. 18. 'EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES ALL THE SODIUM IN THE LAND SO PATENTED, AND TO IT OR PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY IT, THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SUCH DEPOSITS FROM THE SAME UPON COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE ACT OF JULY 17, l9l4 (38 STAT. 509), AS AMENDED BY THE ACT OF MARCH 4, ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW23l68l The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1933 (47 STAT. 1570). AS RESERVED rN PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1965 IN BOOK 370 AT PAGE 462. 19. 'EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1, t946 (60 STAT. 755), ALL URANIUM, THORIUM OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AT TIME TO ENTER UPON THE LAND AND PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE THE SAME". AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 18,1952IN BOOK 263 AT PAGE 169. 20. RESERVATION OF LIFE ESTATE OF GISELLA FIOU OF ONE-HALF OF ALL THE ROYALTY PAYMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE PRODUCTION OF MINERALS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1965 IN BOOK 370 AT PAGE 69. 21, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY IOO FEET IN WIDTH AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 13, 1959IN BOOK 3I9 AT PAGE 446. 22. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER IO,1967IN BOOK 388 AT PAGE 345. 23. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1969IN BOOK 401 AT PAGE 391. 24. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 79.15 RECORDED JULY IO, 1979IN BOOK 531 AT PAGE 250. 25. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SEWAGE TREATMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT . RECORDED JULY II, L979IN BOOK 53I AT PAGE 325. 26. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 26,I964IN BOOK 36I AT PAGE 476. ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW231681 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 27, RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS ACROSS EXISTING ROADWAY AND RIGHT TO USE OF DOMESTIC WATER SPRING AND OUTBUILDINGS AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 19,I97I IN BOOK 417 AT PAGE 600. 28. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT RECORDED JULY 30, 7979,IN BOOK 532 AT PAGE 189 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 05, 1980, IN BOOK 544 AT PAGE 769. 29. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 05, 1980, IN BOOK 544 AT PAGE 733 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 05, 1980, IN BOOK 544 AT PAGE 764 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1991, IN BOOK 799 AT PAGE 48 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1992IN BOOK 847 AT PAGE 190 AND AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST t2, t998IN BOOK 1083 AT PAGE229. 30. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF TRENCH, CONDUIT AND VAULT AGREEMENT RECORDED MARCH 16,1994IN BOOK 895 AT PAGE 697. 31. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO TO THOMAS E. NEAL IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 1, i988IN BOOK 743 AT PAGE 662. 32. CONDITIONS, STIPULATIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 5,1978 IN BOOK 510 AT PAGE 805. 33. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 12, 1995IN BOOK 940 AT PAGE 516. 34. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 83-274 RECORDED AUGUST 23, 1983IN BOOK 633 AT PAGE 851. 35. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CONSENT TO VACATE PLAT RECORDED JUNE 06, 1984 IN BOOK 65I AT PAGE 70. 36. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 IN BOOK 84I AT PAGE 512. ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW23 168 I The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 37, TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENTS RECORDED NOVEMBER 23,1992 IN BOOK 847 AT PAGE 804 AND RECORDED JUNE 26, 1997 IN BOOK 1023 AT PAGE 692 38. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 8, 1996 IN BOOK 963 AT PAGE 449. 39. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 96-34 RECORDED JUNE 18, 1996 IN BOOK 982 AT PAGE 103. 40. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED JULY 16, 1996 IN BOOK 985 AT PAGE 479. 41. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 26,1997,IN BOOK IO31 AT PAGE 452. 42. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 98.30 RECORDED M'AY 27, 1998 IN BOOK 1069 AT PAGE 613. 43. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER I, 1997 IN BOOK 1044 AT PAGE 466. 44. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. NOTE: UPON RECEIPT OF A SURVEY, MEETING THE ALTA MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR CONTENT AND ACCURACY, THE EXCEPTION SHOWN ABOVE WILL BE DELETED. PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADD ANY EXCEPTIONS IT DEEMS NECESSARY FOR MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SAID SURVEY. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Required by C.R.S. l0-ll-122 A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer's authorized agent. C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Effective September l, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at lease one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. APPE,NDIX C 06/2L/Sg 22:.O3 tle70 0{s 0760 .gr\!e ri19. TARTY CREEN r Fg! aL E oos [0s fiiloos MilcE 8820 Counry Boad lt4 0lensood Sprhge, C0 g160l Phone: (970) g4s6see IvnaZ1,,1999 B:Ad of Corrnfy Cnquniseionora of Garfield Cognty {o laf1tO Counry ptanning Oce"rrm*i Garfi eld County Corrrtborrss' 109 Eighth Street, Suilo 303 Gleawood Springs, CO g1d0l Dear Comniasioners: r ara urit''rg 3 !'tanaging Prrbcr of l{s.Anrigos Ruucir partrerehip, tho o\{Dsr of sll of &eland within thoLosAmigosiroiaFtn *u"nu-* pr'*i"*rtL*cdprpriminaryplau approvalfor Filings 6 - l0 of r os l,oig"t n^tl, piro. gy tliir r.n#; hercby authoriziog the eubminarofarequest 1o ar:natd the afor;aidPreiind;rypl;n. I ern firflh;authoriziag GtcgBoecker, projectManzga' to Eprqtsnt Los Amigoe n*"t, r.rL.".uia 1 "rr p*r.oongs ue6re tuZ-o.rt"ra countyCommissioners regardins the ,;auest d Amended pr.firrfi.ry if*. Ifyouncodadditioualinformatioa,plersofeelaeetocoutectldr.Boeckcrrat(g ?0)945-6399. Sincaely, LOS AI{IGOS RAIVCH PARTNER*SHIP ",,4,{ir#_Thomas E_ Nc I Re: APPENDIX I) PROPERTY O!\'NERS LOS AMIGOS RANCH PUD LOT 15 FILING 1 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOTS 5-7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 1O FILING 2 LOT II LOT I2 LOT 13 Robert and Marianne Iwamoto 0031 Los Amigos Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Kenneth and Deborah Robers P.O. Box 2466 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Louis and Suzanne Eller P.O. Box 137 New Castle, CO 81647 Paul and Carlota Klimas 1222 Roundhouse Lane Alexandria, VA22314 Thomas E. Neal 141 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1720 Chicago, IL 60604 James A.R. Johnson 420 46 Street NE, #406 Watertown, SD 57201-2638 Jerry and Sidney Hays 0302 Pinion Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Edmund Miller Box 461 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Mike and Kathy McCormack 0414 Pinion Drive Glenwood Springs, CO StOOt PaEick and Laurie Winters 2240 Rhoda Place Scotch Plains, NJ 07076 Doug Olsen P.O. Box 9103 Aspen, CO 81612 Jerry and Lynn Longbons 051 I Pinion Point Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 LOT 16 LOT 17 LOT 18 FILING 3 LOT 19 LOT 20 LOT 2I LOT 22 LOTSZ3 &24 LOT 25 FILING4 LOT 26 Philip M. Maass 11785 Nob Way Golden, CO 80403 Hayan Alzahid P.O. Box 738 Aspen, CO 81612 Stanley Posusta 1209 Mountain Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Nancy A. Coleman 153 Current Drive New Castle, CO 81647 Steve and Kathy Quint 0134 Cedar Cove Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Chuck and Carol McCurry 0206 Cedar Cove Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Kirk and Jean Huyser 0258 Cedar Cove Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Bill and Jane Ryan 8l I Bay Colony Drive, Apt. 801 Naples, FL 34108 Cris Aronson and Terry Ewbank 0271 Cedar Cove Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Donald and Linda Whilldin 0209 Cedar Cove Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Hermann Guenther c/o Armand Guenther 4707 South Urban Way Morrison, CO 80465 LOT 14 LOT 27 LOT 28 LOT 29 LOT 30 FILING 5 LOT 37 LOT 38 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 41 LOT 43 LOT 44 LOT 45 James Wentzel 1039 Park West Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Wes Graham and Virgrnia Traxler 5010 Woodland Avenue Des Moines, IA 50312 Dennis Brady P.O. Box 2516 Aspen, CO 81612 Patrick Martin 6457 S. Jackson Street Littleton, co 80121 R. Glyn Moulton P.O. Box 732 Edwards, CO 81632 Ken and Kathy Beckwith P.O. Box I166 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Donald and Lynne Collins P.O. Box 52 Salt Lake Ciry, UT 841l0 Robert G. Thompson P.O. Box 992 Frisco, CO 80443 Thomas and Jane Alby 362 Fruita Drive Pueblo West, CO 81007 Lawrence and Kathy Nunamaker 3757 Suney Hill Place Columbus, OH43220 Kenneth and Elizabeth Kulwiec 0325 Westbank Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Frederick Haltermann & Margaret Burke P.O. Box 2631 Vail, CO 81658 Clare A. Kubovchik 22305 Sycamore Drive Fairview, OH44126 LOT 49 LOT 50 LOT 51 LOT 52 LOT 53 LOT 57 LOT 59 LOTS 60 & 61 LOT 62 LOT 63 LOT 66 LOT 61 Frank and Lisa Traditi 485 Bexley Street Highlands Ranch, CO 80126 Michael and Jane Vincent 4339 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Arur Cunningham and David Martin P.O. Box 90564 San Diego, CA 92169-2564 Jennifer and David Hussey 0485 Pinion Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 David Thiel 1607 Defiance Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 Charles and Karen Trom 1208 Norman Lane Deerfield, IL 60015 Spencer and Monique Vidal 300 B Vagneur Lane Basalt, co 81621 Steven and Sally Smith 9527 Good Lion Road Columbia, MD 2 1045-3948 Michael E. Feltrnan 22166 Lake Street Cassopolis, MI49301 Norman Steepe and Linda Jackson 0202 Dakota Meadows Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 Michele and Frank Hagemann 808 7n Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Gregory S. Boecker 2929 Cornty Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 LOT 46 LOS AMIGOS RANCH PUD List of Property Owners within 200 ft' 239501207001 Miernick, Ted 4902 - 154 RD Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601 239501207002 Hershorerq GarY 22634 Brooksdale St. Farmington, NM 48336 239501207003 Hughes, Diane 4906 - 154 RD Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601 239507207004 Vennes, Jo Anne PO Box 2130 Glenwood SPrings, CO 81602 218526400017 Brown, James and ShirleY PO Box 457 Glenwood SPrings, CO 81602 Colo Department Of HighwaY 202 Centenial Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601 Burea of Land Management 50629HighwaY 6&24 Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601 Gibsoru William and Pamela PO Box 376 Basalt, CO 81621 Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association 2929 CoantY Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Rader, HaYden P.O. Box 366 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 RE-l School District P.O. Box 820 Glenwood SPrings, CO 8f 602 239501100142 Moscon, Peter and Katheryn PO Box 73 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239501100023 Langston, Leonard and Mindy 323 Park Ave #I-1 Basalt, CO 81621 239501100024 Slattery, William and Judith sr34 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239501100132 Luu, Chi Hoa and Hongtial 64l6Hvty 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239501100133 Vaningeq John and Larsoq Patricia 6400 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239501100026 Piccione, David and Claudia 6342Hwy 82 Glenwood springs, CO 81601 239501100027 Smith, Scott and Liesa 6296Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-9357 239501200028 Mcdowell, Willaim 6000 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239501200039 White, George and Linda 4812 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239501207005 Iron Mountain Condo fusn. Suite C-Id Village Plaza Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218536300004 Kirham, Analee 4602 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218536300005 Dover, Robert and Kreske, Meredith 4606 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Denver and Rio Grande Railroad 555 lTth St. #2400 Denver, CO 80202 218535400012 Rose, James PO Box 432 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218535200004 L & Y Jammaron Family LLP 4915 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218535300019 Jammaron, Joe and Geraldine PO Box 1631 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239501400138 Gould Construction 6874Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 23950t400139 Valley Investment Proprerties Partnership 201 N. Mill sr. #102 Aspeq CO 81611 239507400140 Colorado West Regional Mental Health Center PO Box 40 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239501100008 Fuller, Mary and Ronald PO Box 789 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239307201012 239307201013 Van Rand Park Assn PO Box 248 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239307201003 No Name Properties 1328 Grand Ave Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239307z}loot Blue Water Enterprises LLC POBox2299 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 218536300006 Dover, Joseph 4606 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 218536300007 Smittu Charles and Barbara 1949 Wallenberg Dr Ft. Collins, CO 80526 218536300008 Glmer, Kathleen 4696 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218536300009 Ryman, Richard and Cynthia 4728 - 154 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218536300010 Crull, Dennis and Penny PO Box 1084 Blue Springs, MO 64013 218536300002 Hauskins, William and Christine 1020 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2 I 8536300003 Golden BuffEntelPrises PO Box 2104 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 n%47100002 Garfield County 109 Sth #300 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239307201001 Blue Water Enterprises PO Box 2299 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602-2299 239306300001 Gould, Mark 6874IIwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239306300006 Royal Mini Storage PO Box 2526 Glenwood Springs, CA 81602-2526 239306300003 Gary Jochum and Rick Broadhurst 594 County Road 110 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239306300004 Dodson Partnership 1254 - 127 RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239306301007 Reynolds, William & Sheperd, Joan 4875 Pearl East Circle # 300 Boulder, CO 80301 239306301008 Dodson, Stanley PO Box 248 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 239306301005 Alpine Investments PO Box P FT. Collins, CO 80522 239307201004 Perau, Ronald 133 Marand RD Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2t852530095 Mulcahy, Bety 1000 Chestnut St Apt l2-A San Francisco, CA 2185253001 1 1 2t8525300112 Galliccio, Vincent and Hayes, Gayle PO Box 8065 Aspen, CO 81621 2t852520300r Village Associates, LLC The Parkway Building 1900 Shawnee Mission Parkway Suite 140 Mission Woods, KS 66205 2t8525100105 Boyle, Robert and Lerma, Emma June 153 Orchard Ln Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-5525 218730400098 218729300097 218732200096 Bryan, Samuel and Beverly PO Box 327 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 218525t00104 Welleq Mark 732 Bennett Ave Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218732200094 Odom, Curtis %, Reed, Anita Y+,Manchester,T.Va PO Box 6573 Snowmass Village, CO 81615 218733400106 Berkley Family Partnership 3961-l14Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 239304200034 Colorado Mountain College PO Box 1001 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 LOS AMIGOS RAI,{CH PUD PRELIMINARY PLAT, FILINGS 6.10 DRAINAGE REPORT FOR PKELIMINARY PLAN SABMISSION JUNE 1999 Prepared by: Schmueser Gordon MeYer, Inc. 118 West 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood SPrings CO 81601 970/94s-1004 cover/1 502c19.wsc DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The Drainage Plan for the Preliminary Subdivision is rather simplistic. Due to the fact hill, off-site water sheds were a small influencr slope of the land from south to north also allows with minor cross culverts at intersections and L TR-55 and Rational Method are two me to medium size basin. The Rational Method was in this area of Colorado, it generally predicts higl 55 analysis. The procedure for using the Rational Metl rainfall intensity corresponding to the time of co area in acres to calculate the flood peak in cubic based on land use, soil type and slope. The Soil County (Figure 1) shows that soils found withi group B. The runoff coefficient for this project impervious and pervious areas as shown: Weighted C = [(0.95 * A,-o"_,o,") The overall drainage plan is shown on Dr Many different basins (Figure 2) were identified i for basins extending outside the property area r on 1" : 2000' USGS quadrangle maps. A 1' calculate basin areas within the property. ln the case of minor basins, areas under used. Also, ditch flows were found using a pe of the basins are intercepted by roadside ditchr The remainder of this report consists o calculations perf ormed and drainage elemen information used to calculate times of concentr DMK:lec\1502c19.drn rinary Plan, Filings 6-10 of Los Amigos Ranch fact that the proiect is located near the ridge of a uence to the overall drainage of the project. The llows the drainage to be carried by roadside ditches and low points. o means of determining peak flows within a small I was chosen for this analysis due to the fact that, s higher flood peaks than those produced by a TR- Method is one that utilizes a runoff coefficient, the rf concentration of the basin, and the overall basin ;ubic feet per second. The runoff coefficients are Soil Conservation Service Soil Study for Garfield nithin these drainage basins are classified as soil rject was calculated using a weighted formula for -ior") * (0.26 * Ar.*,o,")J/Aro,", rn Drawing LAD of the Preliminary Plan drawings. iied and used in hydrologic calculations. The areas rea were determined by planimetering boundaries A 1" : 500' scale AutoCADD map was used to er two acres, a minimum culvert size of 18" was percentage of total basin flows since only parts :hes. ; of tables showing the results from hydrologic ents to be used. Followed by spreadsheet ntration for each basin. GORDON MEYER, INC.SCHMUESER \5 a\\ SOIL SURVEY MAP FIGURE 1 4 . 3.32 .!; I CA]TLE CREEK EUADRANCLE @LORADO-GARFIELD @. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOCRAPHIC) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEI CEOLOCICAL SURVEY : r0{ r 500 ooo Ftfi o a [q ".* -'r r' u , 4 t-\-- il-= \ .^'& \\/,fi- 'l (- a (\ Los Amigos PUD, Preliminary Plan filings 6-10 Job # 1502 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Area lmpervious Area (ft^2) Length (ft) Width (ft) (ft"2) Area (Ac) Area (Ac) Total Total Road Area lmpervious Pervious Basin # Lots 1 30.21 2 10,000.00 720.00 13 9,360.00 0.46 29.71 2 15.98 4 20,000.00 1,750.00 15 26,250.00 1.10 14.8€ JA 12.71 q 25,000.00 1,500.00 15 22,500.00 1.13 11.5€ 3B 33.31 14 70,000.00 3,450.00 16 55,200.00 2.95 30.3€ 4 1.84 1 5,000.00 '1,000.00 13 13,000.00 0.48 1.3€ 192.00 '16 3,072.OO 5A 18.68 15.000.00 950.00 15 14,250.00 0.69 17.99 5B 3.17 2 10,000.00 2,000.00 13 26,000.00 0.87 z.Jt_) 5C 62.27 11 55,000.00 1,850.00 13 24,050.00 2.31 59.96 1,360.00 16 21,760.00 o 130.30 13 65,000.00 406.00 13 5,278.00 2.80 127.5C 962.00 16 15,392.00 1.551.00 13 20,163.00 1,242.00 13 16,146.00 7 3.85 U 0.00 1,006.00 16 16,096.00 0.39 3.4€ o 26.91 4 20,000.00 1,551.00 13 20,163.00 1.21 25.7C 793.00 16 12,688.00 I 7.13 0 0.00 400.00 16 6,400.00 0.16 6.97 10 1 86.1 8 7 35,000.00 600.00 't6 9,600.00 1.36 184.82 1,141.O4 '13 14,833.00 11 14.45 15,000.00 1 ,1 41 .00 13 14,833.00 o.71 13.74 12 38.62 2 10,000.00 789.00 16 12,624.00 0.54 38.08 134 23.41 2 10,000.00 1,000.00 16 16,000.00 0.62 22.79 138 10.19 1 5,000.00 819.00 16 13,104.00 0.43 9.76 14 400.96 7 35,000.00 525.00 to 8,400.00 1.32 399.64 1.092.0C 13 14,196.00 15 64.53 11 55,000.00 't,092.00 13 14,196.00 1.76 62.7i 583.00 13 7,579.00 2,309"00 16 36,944.00 16A 27.66 b 30,000.00 1,750.00 15 26,250.00 1.33 26.3i 168 46.62 5 25,000.00 1,850.00 '15 27,750.0C 1.25 45.31 17 24.47 6 40,000.00 1,134.00 13 14,742.OO 2.22 22.21 3,240.00 13 42,120.00 '18 1.23 0 0.00 600.00 15 9,000.00 0.22 1.01 19 20.20 4 20,000.00 1,000.00 '15 15,000.00 0.83 19.37 5A+58 21.85 q 25,000.00 40,250.00 1.50 20.35 5A+58+5C 84.12 16 80,000.00 64,300.00 3.31 80.81 2+3A+38 62.00 23 1 15,000.00 103,950.00 5.03 56.97 1+6 160.51 15 75,000.00 66,339.00 3.24 157.27 1 5+1 68 1 1 1.15 16 80,000.00 86,469.00 3.82 107.33 10+11 200.63 10 50,000.00 39,266.00 2.O5 '198.5€ DMK:dlc Page 1 los amigos #1502 Los Amigos PUD, Prelinimary Plan Filings 6-10 Job # '1502 25 - Yr Flood Peaks !mpervious Pervious Basin Tc Total 125 yr A Area Area Q25 Historic* cfs -ASSUMES SAME BASIN DELINEATION AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION min) (in/hr)acres) (acres) (cfs) Q25 1 21 2.36 30.21 0.46 29.75 19.29 18.54 2 20 2.42 15.98 1.10 14.88 1 1.89 10.05 3A 20 2.42 12.71 1.13 1 1.58 9.BB 8.0c 3B 20 2.42 33.31 2.95 30.36 25.88 20.9€ 4 o 2.52 1.84 0.48 1.36 2.04 1.21 5A a.)ZO 2.25 18.68 0.69 17.99 12.00 10.93 5B 20 2.42 3.17 0.87 2.30 3.45 1.9E 5C 25 2.16 62.27 2.31 59.96 38.41 34.97 6 31 1.88 130.30 2.80 127.50 67.32 63.68 7 26 2.12 3.8s 0.39 346 2.69 2.12 o 22 2.34 26.91 1.21 25.70 18.33 '16.37 9 19 2.47 7.13 0.15 6.97 4.85 4.5€ 10 41 1.55 186.'1 8 1.36 184.82 76.49 75.0: 11 26 2.08 14.45 0.71 13.74 8.83 7.81 12 28 2.00 38.62 0.54 38.08 20.83 20 08 13A 25 2.16 23.41 0.62 22.79 14.07 13.15 138 20 2.42 10.19 0.43 9.76 7.13 6.41 14 50 1.39 400.96 1.32 399.64 146.17 144.91 15 34 1.74 64.53 1.76 62.77 31.31 29.19 164 25 2.14 27.66 1.33 26.33 17.35 15.39 168 26 2.10 46.62 1.25 45.37 27.27 25.45 17 20 2.43 24.47 2.22 22.25 19.18 15.4e '18 10 3.26 1.23 0.22 1.01 1.54 1.04 19 20 2.42 20.20 0.83 19.37 14.10 12.71 5A+58 25 2.16 21.85 1.50 20.35 14.51 12.27 5A+58+5C 30 1.92 84.12 3.31 80.81 46.38 41.99 2+3A+38 ZO 2.08 62.00 5.03 56.97 40.75 33.53 1+6 31 1.88 160.51 3.24 157.27 82.66 78.4e 1 5+1 68 34 1.74 111.15 3.82 107.33 54.87 50.2e 10+11 41 1.55 200.63 2.05 198.58 83.05 80.85 DMK:dlc Page 1 los amigos #1502.xls Drainaoe Element Worksheet DRAINAGE ELEMENT 1 2 3 3A 4 5 5A 5B 6 7 8I 10 11 12 13A 138 14 15 16A 168 17 18 19 BASIN 1 2 2,3,38,4 3A 4 5A,58,5C 5A 5B 1,6 7 8 9 10,1 1 11 12 13A 138 14 15,168 16A 168 17 18 19 DESCRIPTION 24" CMP 24'CMP 36'CMP 18'CMP 18'CMP 36'CMP 18" CMP 24'CMP 48" CMP 18" CMP 30'CMP 18'CMP 48'CMP 24" CMP 30" cMP 24. CMP 24'CMP 54'CMP 42'CMP 24" CMP 30" CMP 30'CMP 18" CMP 24" CMP 'All culverts were calculated using inlet control with Hw/d < 1.5 Pipe is assumed to be Helical com.rgated Metal pipe, with metal end sections. Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 Executed: 11 : 43 : 58 S/N: 1-240s451191L-13-1996 LOSAMIl.TCT SUMMARY SHEET FOR(Solved for Time Tc oT Tt COMPUTATIONS using TR-55 Methods) LOS AMIGCIS Subarea descr.Tc or Tt Basin L Basin 2 Basin 3 Basin 4 Basin 5 Basin 6 Basin 7 Basin 8 Basin 9 Basin 10 Basin Ll- Basin L2Basin 13 Basin 14 Basin t5 Basin 15 Basin L7 Tc Tc Tc Tc ha Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tc Tirne ( hrs ) 0.35 0.45 0.49 0.31 0.41_ o.52 0.43 0.36 0.31 0.59 o .44 o .47 o.4t- 0.83 o.57 o.44 o .34 Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 Executed: L1:43:58 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, r Channel slope, s Manning's roughness 2/3 1.49 rr ; * $= n FIow length, L T = L / (3600*V) S/N: r24054511911-I3-1996 LOSA},TII.TCT LOS A},IIGOS Segrment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (total < or = 300)Two-yr 24-}:rr rainfaIl, P2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .007 * (n*L) m-I- 1 RANGE 0.1300 ft 300.0 in 1.300ft/fE o. r.330 hrs 0.26 ft fE/ft fL/s 2 Unpaved 900.0 0.0550 3.7839 lhrs o.07 0.5 0.4 P2*g SHALLOI^I CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf : Paved Csf = T : L / (35OO,IV) 16.1345 20.3282 = O.26 : 0.07 Area, = a/Pw coeff. L/2 S sq. ft ftftfE/ft ditch 8.00 16.94 o .472 o. o450 0.0330,n fE/s ft hrs 5.8085 541 0.03 (hrs) 0.03 0.35 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:124054511_9-xecuted: 11:43:58 1l--13-199G LOSAMII_.TCT LOS A},IIGOS TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n two-yr 24-t:,,r rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8.007 * ( n:tl,) fi_L- L range 0. r300ft 300.0in L.300 fE/fl o. r.330 hrs o.26 2 Unpavedft 900.0 fE/f t o. o44o fL/s 3.3844 hrs o.07 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5 = 0.26 0.07 = 0.12 Avg.V = $rhere: T:L/ Csf * (s) Unpaved Csf = 1"6.L345 Paved Csf = 20.3282 ( 360O*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segiment ID Cross Sectional FIow Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, r Channel slope, s Flanning's roughness 2/3 l-;49 :k ; * \r7 = n Flow length, L T = L / (3600'rV) Area, a = a/Pw coeff., n r/2 S sq. ftftftft,/fE ditch 8.00 16.94 o.472 0.0300 0.0330 fl/s ft hrs 4 .7 426 2065 o.12 (hrs) 0.4s Tc COMPUTATIoNS FoR: Basin SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43Ixecuted: 11:43:58 0.5 P2*g S/N: L24O545119 l-l-13-1996 LOSAI{I1. TCT LOS AMIGOS Segrment ID Surface description Manning,s roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfal1, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8.007 * (n:rl,) m_J_- 1 range 0. L300ft 300.0in 1.300ft/ft 0.0670 hrs 0.34 ftft/tt ft/s 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 hrs 0 .00 0.4 = 0.34 = 0.00 = 0. l-5 SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = l-6.1_345paved Csf : 2O.3ZBT T : L / (3600,kv) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, at^Ietted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, E = a/pwChannel slope, s Manning,s roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2 L.49 * g :b g \r7 = n Flow length, L T = L / (3600*V) sq. ftftftft./ft ft/s ft hrs ditch 8.00 t6.94 o.472 0.0540 0.0330 6.3629 3561 0.15 TOTAL TrME (hrs) 0.49 2 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119-xecuted: 11:43:58 11-13-1996 LOSAMIl. TCT LOS AI'{IGOS TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BA6iN SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface .description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 Land slope, s 0.8 .007 * (n*L) m-I_ 0.5 0.4 P2*g SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrnent ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5 Avg.V : Csf * (s)where' H:3:x'u 3:f = :l'.*tz a:L/(3600rkv) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, a Wetted perimeter, Pw Hydraulic radiusr E = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * r * g n Flow length, L T = L / (3600:kV) t- range 0.l-300 ft 300.0 in l-.300 fL/ft 0. r-r.70 hrs o.27 2 Unpaved ft s00.0 ft/ft 0.1000 fE/s 5.Lo22 hrs 0.03 = O.27 = 0.03 sq. ftftftfE/ft ditch 4.50 L2.7L 0.354 0.0387 0.0330 fE/s ft hrs 4.4458 ].87 0 .01_ TOTAL = 0.0I 0.31 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43axecuted: 1L:43 :58 S/N:124054511911-l-3-1996 LOSAr{I1.TCT LOS AMIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * ( n*L) m- 1 range 0.1300ft 300.0in l-.300ft/fE o. r_000 hrs O.29 ftft/fE ft/s 2 Unpaved 800.0 0.0500 3.5078 hrs 0.06 0.5 0 .4 P2:hg SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s o-5Avg.V=.Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf : Paved Csf = T=L/(3600'rV) 15.1345 20.3282 o.29 : 0.06 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, aWetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radiust y = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * r * g FIow length, L T = L / (3600*V) sq. ftftftfE/tt ft/s ft hrs swale 8.00 ]-9.94 o.401 0.0870 0.0350 6.8301_ 1500 0.06 TOTAL 0.06 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:12405451I9 "xecuted: 11:43:58 L1-13-1996 LOSAI,IIt.TCT LOS AMIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 6 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n*L) m- 0.5 0.4 P2*S SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V : Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf = LO.l_345Paved Csf = 20.3292 A = L / (3500,tV) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment ID Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radiusr t = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 t/2 L.49 :b p * g \rr = n FIow length, L T : L / (3600'rV) 1 range 0.l_300 in 1.300ft/tE 0.0800 hrs O.32 2 Unpavedft L700.0ft /tE o. 07r-o ft /s 4.2992 hrs 0.11 swale ft 24.65ft 0.487 fE/fE o. 0760 0.0350 ft/s 7.2629 ft 2500 hrs 0.10 Flow length, L (total < or = 300) ft 3OO.O = O.32 = 0.11 Cross Sectional FIow Area, a sq. f t l-2 . OO = 0.10 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.52 TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 7 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segrment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 Land slope, s 0.8 .007 * (n:rL) Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43-xecuted: 11: 43 :58 S/N: 1240s451191L-l3-1996 LOSAMIl.TCT LOS AI'{IGOS range ftinft/fE hrs ft ft/f.t fE/s hrs sq. ftftft fE/tE fL/s ft hrs 0.1300 300.0 L.300 0.0500 0.38m_l_- 0.5 0.4 P2*g SHAI,LOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse s1ope, s 0.5 Avg.V : Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf : l-5.1345Paved Csf : 20.3282 T=L/(3600*v) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, a Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, r : a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2L.49 ,. r * 5,v- 2 Unpaved 150.0 0.0670 4.L763 = 0.38 = 0.0L : 0.04 Flow length, L T : L / (3600*v) 0.0L ditch 4.50 L2.7L 0.354 0. ot-23 0.0330 2.5064 350 0. 04 (hrs ) 0.43,IOTAL Quick TR-S5 Ver.5.43 SrzN:t-240545LL9-xecuted: L1:43:58 L1-13-1996 LOSAMIl.TCT LOS AMIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Seg:nent ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (totaI < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-hr rainfalI, p2 Land s1ope, s 0.8 .OO7 * ( n*L) m_ 0.5 0.4P2*S SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)? Flow length, L Watercourse s1ope, s 0.5Avg.V= Csf* (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Paved Csf = 2o.32gz T : L / (3500*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, a!{etted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, y: a/pw Channel sIope, s Manni-ng's roughness coeff ., n 2/3 t/2 ),.49 * r :k g $: n Flow length, L l=L/(3600*V) 1 range 0. 1300ft 300.0in L.300 ft /tL 0. r_170 hrs 0.27 2 Unpavedft 1000.0tt /fl 0.0600 fl/s 3.9521 hrs 0.07 : 0.27 = 0.07 = 0.01 sq. ftftfttt/fE fE/s ft hrs swale 6.00 15.53 0.386 0.0670 0.0350 5.8448 300 0.01 TIME (hrs) 0.36 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545r19 xecuted: lI:43:58 11-L3-1996 LOSAMfI.TCT LOS AMIGOS Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 9 SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only) Segrment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * ( n*L) I-0.5 0 .4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avgt.V: Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf = 15.L345Paved Csf = 20.3292 T=L/(3600*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Wetted perimeter, Pw Hydraulic radius, r = a/Pw Channel slope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2L.49 * r * g $: n FIow length, L T--L/(3600?rrv) Flow length, L (tota1 < or = 300) ft 300.0 L range 0. L300 in 1".300 ft/fE o. r.o0o hrs O.29 ft 0.0fE/fL o. o00o fE/s 0.0000 hrs 0.00 swale ft 1.92 f t L.o42fE/ft o. o5oo 0.03s0 fE/s 9.78L9 ft 600 hrs 0.02 = 0.29 = 0.00 Cross Sectional FIow Area, a sq.ft 2.00 = 0.02 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.3r Quick TR-55 ver.5.43 S/N: L24O545119 , -xecuted: 1I:43:58 1L-13-199G LOSAI,{Il.TCT,.. LOS AMIGOS TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: BASiN 10 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-}:^r rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n:rl,) m_ 0 .5 0.4 P2*g SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse s1ope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s) where: Unpaved Csf = 16.L345Paved Csf : 20.3292 T = L / (3600:rV) CHANNEL FLOW Segiment ID n FIow length, L T = L / (3600*V) t range 0.1300 in L.300fl/fE 0. os3o hrs O.37 2 Unpavedft 2000.0fE/fE 0.0s00 ft/s 3.5078 hrs 0. L5 swale ft 0.685fE/ft o. 0450 0.0350 fE/s 7.oL94 ft 4200 hrs O.77 = 0.37 = 0.15 Cross Sectional Flow Area, a sq.ft 14.00Wetted perimeter, pw ft 20.43Hydraulic radius, t: a/Pw Channel sIope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * s * g V- = O.L7 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.69 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N: I24A545II9-xecuted: 11:55:18 f1-13-l_996 LOSAI,IIZ.TCT Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: SHEET FLOW (appfi""ble to Tc only) Basin L1 l_Seqrment IDSurface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-}:,r rainfal}, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n:tl,) m_ 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOT^] Seg:ment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)?FIow length, L!{atercourse slope, s 0.5 0. L300 300.0 1.300 0.0670 0.34 = 0.34 Avg. V : where: T=L/ CHANNEL FLOW csf * (s) Unpaved CsfPaved Csf ( 3600:tV) range 3oo ) frinfE/ft sq. ftftftft /tt fL/s ft hrs hrs 2 Unpavedft 1600.0 fL/fE o. o7so fE/s 4.4L86 hrs 0. l0 L6.1345 20.3282 Segment ID Cross Sectional Plow Wetted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, r : Channel sIope, s Manning's roughness 2/3 1.49 $: FIow T=L n length, L / ( 3500:iV) Area, a : a/Pw coeff., n L/2 0.00 0.00 0 .000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0 .00 = 0.10 0.00 (hrs) 0.44TOTAL Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N: L240545119-xecuted: 11:55:18 1L-L3-L996 LOSAMI2.TCT Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 72 SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segrment fD Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (total < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-hr rainfa1l, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * (n*L) m_L- l_ range 0.1300ft 300.0in L.300ft/ft 0.0570 hrs 0.340.5 0.4 P2:tg SHALLO!{ CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? FIow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V: Csf * (s) where: Unpaved CsfPaved Csf T=L/(3600,tV) ftft/ft ft/s 2 Unpaved L450.0 0.0550 3.7439 : 0.34 = 0.L1 0.02 15.1345 20.3282 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional Ftow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radi.us, t: a/pw Channel slope, sManning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 t/2L.49 * r * s t, _ n FIow length, L T:L/(3600,hV) fr F.ITS hrs sq. ftftftfE/ft 0.11 swale 5.00 15.53 0.385 0.0700 0.0350 ft/s 5 .97 42 500 o.02 TOTAL TIME (hrs) o.47 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43-xecuted: 11 : 55: 18 S/N:1240545119 11-13-1996 LOSAMI2.TCT Tc SHEET FLOW (Applicable Segnnent ID Surface description COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin 13 to Tc only) Manning's roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (total < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-}:^r rainfall, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .OO7 * ( n*L) m- L range 0. L300ft 300.0in 1.300ft/ft 0.0670 hrs 0.340.5 0 .4 P2:hg SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, LWatercourse sIope, s 0.5Avg.V : CSf * (S) where: Unpaved Csf :paved Csf : T = L / (3600*V) ftfE/ft fE/s 2 Unpaved L000.0 0. o600 3.952l. = 0.34 = O.O7 = 0.00 15.1345 20.3282 hrs 0. 07 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, F = a/pwChannel slope, s Manning,s roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2 L.49 * 1. Jr gv- n FIow length, L T:L/(3500i.v) sq. ftftftft/tt ft/s ft hrs 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 o.0000 0 0.00 TOTAL TIME (hrs)0.41 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/N:1240545119-xecuted: 11:55:18 1L-I3-1996 LOSAMI2.TC? Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin L4 SHEET FLow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Two-yr 24-hr rainfaII, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8.007 * (n*L) m- 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345paved Csf = 20.3292 a = L / (3500*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional FIow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, t = a/pw Channel s1ope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n - 2/3 L/2 L.49 * 3. * g $: n Flow ldngth, L I : L / (3600*V) L range 0.1300ft 300.0in 1.300fE/ft o. o5oo hrs 0.38 2 Unpavedft 1350.0fL/tE 0.0520 fE/s 3.6792 hrs 0 .1-0 = 0.38 = 0.L0 = 0.34 sq. ftftftfE/ft fE/s ft hrs swale 24.OO 33.09 o.725 0.0240 0.0350 5.3239 6600 0.34 ToTAL TIME (hrs) 0.83 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43 S/NzL24O545It9-xecuted: 1l-:55:18 11-13-L996 LOSAMI2.TCT Tc COMPUTATIONS FoR: Basin ]-5 SHEET FLOW (App1icable to Tc only)Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 :r (n*L) m_ 0.5 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segrment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)?FIow length, L Watercourse slope, s 0.5Avg.V : Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Paved Csf = 2O.3Zg2 T : L / (3600:kv) n Flow length, L T:L/(3500'bV) l_ range 0.1300Flow length, L (total < or : 3OO) ft 3OO.OTwo-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 in l_.300 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID SWALECross Sectional Flow Area, a sq.ft g.OO Wetted perirneter, pw ft t2.94Hydraulic radiust t: a/pwChannel sIope, s Manning's roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/21.49 * r * g !: ft /fE 0.0s00 hrs 0.38 2 Unpavedft 2500.0ft/ft 0.0680 fE/s 4 .2o7 4 hrs O.L7 ft 0.518fE/tE 0. o4oo 0.0330 fE/s 5. s520 ft 500 hrs 0.02 = 0.38 = O.L7 = 0.02 TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.57 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43-xecuted: 1l-:55:18 S/N:1240s4s119 LL-l3-1996 LOSA],II2.TCT Tc SHEET FLOW (Applicab1e Seqrment ID Surface description COMPUTATIONS FOR: Basin to Tc only) L5 Manning's roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (total < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 Land slope, s 0.8 .OO7 * ( n*L) m_l-- 0.5 0 .4 P2:tg SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment IDSurface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, L Watercourse sIope, s o.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where' H:g:I"u 3:f = il..*tz T=L/(3600*V) CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, y: a/pwChannel s1ope, s Manningrs roughness coeff., n 2/3 L/2 L.49 /r I /r g, $= n Flow length, L I : L / (3600*V) ::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 range 0.1300ft 300.0in L.300ft/fE 0.0670 hrs 0.34 ft 0.0fl/fL o. o0oo fE/s 0.0000 hrs 0.00 = 0.34 = 0.00 = 0.L0 sq. ftftftfE/fL fL/s ft hrs ditch 8.00 ]-6.94 o .472 0.0350 0.0330 5.t226 t797 0.10 TOTAL TIME (hrs)o .44 Quick TR-55 Ver.5.43-xecuted: L1:55: LB S/N: L24os4stt91l-L3-L996 LOSAIII2.TCT Tc SHEE? FLOW (Applicabte Segrment ID m- 0.5 COMPUTATIONS to Tc only) FOR: Basin L7 1 range 0.1300300) ft 300.0in l-.300ft/ft 0.l_330 hrs o .26 ft 0.0ft /fE 0.0000 ft/s 0.0000 hrs o.00 Surface description Manni-ng,s roughness coeff ., nFIow length, L (tota1 < or =Two-yr 24-hr rainfaIl, p2 Land sIope, s 0.8 .OO7 * ( n*L) 0.4P2*s SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, LWatercourse s1ope, s o.5Avg.Y= Csf * (S)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345paved Csf = 20.3292 T=L/(3600:rv) CHANNEL FLOW Segrment fD Cross Sectional Flow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw Hydraulic radius, F = a/pwChannel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n L.49 * ,'/'* ='/'$= n FIow length, L T = L / (3600,kv) sq. ftftfttt/tL ft/s ft hrs ditch 4.50 L2.7L o.354 0.0420 o. o330 4 .63L4 1427 0.09 o.26 0. oo 0.09 SEI4fEfr SYSTTHS E nvironment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Los Amigos Ranch Colorado Prepared For: Schmueser Gordon Meyer 1.18 West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: 970 94$1004 Fax:970 945-5948 Prepared By: Bruce Richardson Mav 10. 1999 Prepared By: Bruce Richardson PRELIMINARY PRESSURE SEWER - PIPE SZING AND BRANCH ANALYSIS Los Amigos Ranch Colorado May 10, 1999 Zone Number Punps to Z.src Number ofCores n7,me ;J Cora inl Zone I Gal/Day per Core ;l Flow I per cord ;;;t_9il;;:9;;l Velocitv h GPS), I *rt;l uain rhis Zcmt Frirtion [,oss this Zone Accumulated Fridion Loss Max lvtain Elevation Total [namic Head (ft) io This spreac l.oo l---tm 3.00 I lshea was c--eool 6.001 4.001 =-%. t2l 3l :liamaers for 3s0.001 3s0.00 I 3s0.o0l ': SDR2I Tr--ooT 11001 11.00 | PVC----tl 4l 2l 25rI 3.891 1041 6s8.007 1,552.00 I- xsool --1i41- 2.631 2.151 10.15 - 4030 --7.n '-- r?2lllTrrnronf 0.00 t22.tl l1l.96 7,025.00 7.025.00 0.00 I I1.96 96.36 7.010.00 r.010.00 0.00 96.36 89.16 7,010.00 ;.940.00 70.00 159. l6 4.00 5.00 6 9 350.00 I1.00 J 33.00 2.00 2.92 UU /.UU L)+ 5.00 6.00 7 16 350.00 11.00 4 44.00 3.00 1.79 1.390.00 0.40 5.55 76.70 7,010.00 ;.935.00 75.00 151.70 6.00 8.00 ll 39 350.00 11.00 6 66.00 3.00 2.69 t,676.00 0.85 t4.17 71.16 6.950.00 i,950.00 0.00 71.16 7.00 8.00 4 4 350.00 11.00 3 33.00 2.00 2.92 521.00 1.54 8.04 65.03 6,955.00 ;.950.00 5.00 70.03 8.00 l 1.00 L4 57 350.00 I1.00 7 77.00 4.00 1.90 2.223.00 0.33 7.35 56.99 6,933.00 i.860.00 73.00 129.99 9.00 10.00 3 3 350.00 11.00 2 22.00 1.50 3.04 298.00 2.r5 6.41 60.91 6,980.00 t,950.00 30.00 90.91 10.00 l1.00 8 ll 350.00 r 1.00 4 44.00 3.00 1.79 1,217.00 0.40 4.86 54.49 6,980.00 i.900.00 80.00 134.19 r 1.00 14.00 l1 82 350.00 11.00 8 88.00 4.00 2.r7 3-266.00 0.42 13.83 49.64 6.933.00 .855.00 78.00 127.64 12.00 13.00 3 J 350.00 I1.00 2 22.00 l 50 3.04 484.00 2.r5 10.41 64.80 6.970.00 1,950.00 20.00 84.80 13.00 14.00 6 9 350.00 11.00 3 33.00 2.00 2.92 1.204.00 1.54 18.58 54.39 6,955.00 ;.925.00 30.00 8,1 39 14.00 18.00 10 101 350.00 11.00 8 88.00 4.00 2.t7 2,769.00 0.42 tL.72 35.81 6.933.00 ;,875.00 58.00 93.81 15.00 16.00 3 )350.00 11.00 )22.00 1.50 3.04 434.00 2.15 9.34 69.44 6,990.00 ;.975.00 15.00 84 4.1 16.00 17.00 6 9 350.00 1 1.00 J 33.00 2.00 ,o,1,341.00 1.54 20.69 60.10 6.975.00 ;,955.00 20.00 80.10 17.00 18.00 3 t2 350.00 11.00 4 44.00 2.00 3.89 583.00 2.63 15.33 39.41 6,933.00 1.880.00 53.00 92.41 18.00 20.00 I 114 350.00 11.00 9 99.00 4.00 2.44 782.00 0.53 4.t2 24.09 6,933.00 t,875.00 58.00 82.09 19.00 20.00 3 J 350.00 11.00 2 22.00 1.50 3.04 459.00 2.15 9.88 29.84 6,933.00 1.890.00 43.00 72.81 20.00 22.00 6 t23 350.00 11.00 9 99.00 4.00 2.44 1,304.00 0.53 6.87 19.97 6.933.00 ;,890.00 43.00 62.97 21.00 22.00 3 3 350.00 11.00 J 22.00 1.50 3.04 273.00 2.15 5.87 18.98 6,933.00 ;.910.00 23.00 41.98 22.00 31.00 3 t29 350.00 11.00 9 99.00 4.00 2.44 496.00 0.53 2.61 13. l0 6,933.00 t,925.00 8.00 21.10 24.00 24.00 4 22 350.00 11.00 5 55.00 3.00 2.24 770.00 0.60 4.64 4.64 7,063.00 /.045.00 18.00 22.64 25.00 26.00 3 J 350.00 11.00 2 22.00 1.50 3.04 322.00 2.r5 6.93 70.57 7,100.00 /,085.00 15.00 85.57 26.O0 27.00 6 9 350.00 11.00 3 33.00 2.00 70)1.328.00 1.54 20.49 63.65 7,100.00 /.080.00 20.00 83.65 27.00 24.00 9 18 3s0.00 I 1.00 4 44.00 2.00 3.89 1,465.00 2.63 38.51 43.16 7.100.00 7.08s.00 15.00 58.16 28.00 28.50 J J 350.00 11.00 2 22.00 1.50 3.04 422.00 2.15 9.08 s3.25 7.035.00 7,025.00 10.00 63.2s 28.50 30.00 6 9 350.00 1.00 J 33.00 2.00 ,o,9s6.00 t.54 14.7s 44.17 7,015.00 /.000.00 15.00 59.17 29.00 30.00 3 J 350.00 11.00 2 22.00 1.50 3.04 471.00 2.15 10.13 39.55 6.995.00 ;,975.00 20,00 s9.55 30.00 3l.00 )t4 350.00 11.00 4 44.00 2.00 3.89 720.00 2.63 18.93 29.42 6,980.00 i.980.00 0.00 29.42 3I.00 31.00 7 150 350.00 I 1.00 l0 110.00 4.00 2.71 1,639.00 0.64 10.49 10.49 o,l:l.oo l6,eoo.oo 3 3.00 43.49 page I Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity q,?e grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment one' ano,-*, I raaor (tu10ofl{ Minimunr Punp Elevation Static IIead lFa{\ Eriaim lnqs slorlalims wse based on a nside rougf 33.00 r.075.00 4 1..VU 8 44.00 2.00 J 22.40 1.50 12.45 Prepared By: Bruce fuchardson PRELIMINARY PRESSURE SEWER - ACCUMLILATED RETENTION TIME (HR) Los Amigos Ranch Colorado May 10, 1999 7rne Number Punps to Zane Accumulated Total ofCores this Zone Exiging Pipe Sirc Gallons per 100 Lineal Fed' l-,anflh of Zae Capacity ofZone A.verage Daily Flow Average Fluid Changes per DaY Average Rdettior Time(Hr) Accumulaled Rdertitm'I'ime (IIr) 2.13 11.43 1.00 2.00 4 2.00 18.84 658.00 t23 9U I,4UU ll 2.00 6.00 t2 2.00 18.84 1,552.00 292.43 4,200 t4.36 t.67 9.30 3.00 4.00 3 1,50 t2.07 335.00 40.44 1,050 25.97 0.92 12.15 4.00 5.00 9 2.00 18.84 807.00 152.06 3,150 20.72 l. 16 lt.22 5.00 6.00 l6 3.00 40.90 1,390.00 568.4s 5,600 9.85 2.44 10.07 6.00 8.00 39 3.00 40.90 1.676.00 685.42 13,650 t9.91 t.2l 7.63 7.00 8.00 4 2.00 18.84 521,00 98. l7 1,400 14.26 1.68 8.11 8.00 1.00 57 4.00 67.6s 2,223.00 1,503.88 19,950 13.27 L81 6.42 9.00 10.00 3 1.50 12.07 298.00 35.97 1,050 29.19 0.82 8.54 10.00 1.00 ll 3.00 40.90 r,217.00 497.70 3,850 7.74 3. l0 7.72 1.00 4.00 82 4.00 67.65 3.266.00 2,209.48 28,700 12.99 1.85 4.61 2.00 3.00 3 1.50 t2.07 484.00 s8.42 1,050 17.97 1.34 5.83 3.00 4.00 9 2.00 18.84 1,204.00 226.86 3,150 13.89 1.73 4.50 4.00 800 l0l 4.00 67.65 2.769.00 1,873.26 35,350 18.87 1.27 2.77 5.00 6.00 J 1.50 t2.07 434.00 52.38 1,050 20.04 t.20 5.25 6.00 7.00 9 2.00 18.84 1,341.00 2s2.67 3,150 t2.47 1.93 4.05 7.00 8.00 t2 2.00 18.84 583.00 109.85 4,200 38.23 0.63 2.12 8.00 20.00 114 4.00 67.65 782.00 s29.03 39,900 7s.42 0.32 1.50 9.00 20.00 J 1.50 12.07 459.00 55.40 1,050 18.95 1.27 2.44 0.00 22.00 r23 4.00 67.65 1,304.00 882.t7 43,050 48.80 0.49 1.18 21.00 22.O0 3 1.50 12!7 273.00 32.95 1,050 31.86 0.7s 1.44 22.00 1.00 129 4.00 67.65 496.00 335.55 45,150 t34.56 0.18 0.69 24.00 24.00 11 3.00 40.90 770.00 314.90 7,700 24.45 0.98 0.98 25.00 26.00 J l.s0 t2.07 322.00 38.87 1,050 27.02 0.89 4.83 26.00 27.00 9 2.00 18.84 1,328.00 250.22 3,150 12.s9 l.9l 3.94 27.00 24.00 18 2.00 18.84 1,465.00 276.04 6,300 22.82 L05 2.03 28.00 28.50 3 1.50 t2.07 422.00 50.94 1,050 20.61 1.16 3.71 28.50 30.00 9 2.00 18.84 956.00 180.13 3,150 17.49 1.37 2.51 29.00 30.00 3 1.50 t2.07 471.00 56.85 1,0s0 18.47 1.30 2.47 30.00 31.00 l4 2.00 18.84 720.00 135.66 4,900 36.12 0.66 t.l7 31.00 31.00 150 4.00 67.65 1,639.00 1,108.80 52,500 47.35 0.51 0.51 Page I Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment one LOS AMIGOS BANCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR INDIVTDUAL SEWAGE DTSPOSAL SYSTEMS Purpose The purpose of this Management Plan is to provide for regular operations and maintenance of the individual sewage disposal systems. The Management Plan provides a mechanism for regular pumping of septic tanks and for funding the cost thereof . This Management Plan is not intended to provide for common ownership of sewage disposal facilities, nor to provide a mechanism for funding for, or the actual construction of, replacement of individual systems. Responsibility of Management Plan The Management Plan shall be the responsibility of the Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association. The Homeowners Association shall make arrangements with a septic tank pumping company for the pumping of septic tanks on a two-year, rotating basis. Funding The Los Amigos Ranch Homeowners Association will collect, as part of the Association dues, sufficient funds to pay for the bi-annual pumping of septic tanks. The amount of funds collected shall be adjusted as necessary to pay for the cost of the Management Pan. lndividual Homeowners Responsibilities 1 . Provide access to the septic tank for purposes of cleaning. 2. Pump septic tank more frequently, if required, based on actual use. 3. lnitially install, and subsequently replace, failed leach field systems as required, all in accordance with applicable Garfield County Health Codes. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. 'l 502lsds. MP/dwg.loc 5010 Road 15{ Clen*ood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 9{5-8{i{ Phone 970 9.15-7988 Greg Boecker 2929 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Job No. 196 617 Subject:Individual Septic Systems. Los Amigos Ranch p.u.D., countv Road I14, Garfi eld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Boecker: As requested be Dean Gordon, we are providing clarification of our recommendations regarding individual septic systems for the proposed Los Amigos Ranch P.U.D. We have received a cop1, of the first 4 pages of preliminary plat review letter by Wright Water Engineers to Garfield County dated Januarv 9, 1998. We performed a preliminary geotechnical study for the project under Job No. 196 617. dated February 14,1997. Individual Septic Systems: Percolation tests were conducted in January. 1997 to evaluate the feasibility of individual septic systems at the site. The percolarion rates varied from I I to 40 minutes per inch. The average of eleven percolation tests was about 24 minutes per inch. The tests were performed between 3 and 5t/z feet below the ground surface. All the tests were performed in the overburden soils above the basalt flow rock. Partial refusal to digging by the Case 780C rubber-tired backhoe was encountered shallou,erthan 8 feet deep in l5 of 2l pits. The average refusal depth was 4t/z feet. Whether the refusal was on intact basalt flow or on basalt boulders within the overlying basalt colluvium soils could not be determined in the relatively small backhoe pits. Based on our experience in the area and the site geologr,. we expect that the basalt flow is close to the refusal depths encountered in the pits. HePwonrH-P.c,h'Lex G rorrcHxt c.t L, I NC. January 19.1998 The development should be suitable for individual septic svstems. engineered systems may be required in shailow basalt rock areas. based on site specific soils information. Ifyou have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Mounding or other The system designs should be Schmueser Gordon Meyer - Ann: Dean Gordon i Daniel E. Hardin. P.E. PI"JBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that the Los Amigos Ranch Partnership has applied to the County Planning Commission, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to grant approval of an amendment to the Los Amigos Ranch P[ID, Filing 6-10 Preliminary Plan, in connection with the following described property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to wit: Legal Description: See Attached Said amended preliminary plan would allow the petitioner to subdivide 496.98 acres into 174 single family lots with central sewer for all but four (4) estate lots. All persons affected by the proposed Preliminary Plan Amendment are invited to appear and state their views, protests or support. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, as the Board of County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of af[ected property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for Preliminary Plan Amendment. This Preliminary Plan Amendment application may be reviewed at the office of the Planning Department located at Garfield County Courthouse, 109 Sth Street, Suite 303, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. That public hearing on the application for the above Preliminary Plan Amendment has been set for the 1lth day of August,1999, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at the Garfield County Courthouse, Suite 301, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. Planning Department Garfield County Our Order No. GW23 t6gl TEGAI DESCBIPTIt)N THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO BE KNOWN AS FILINGS 6, 7,8, 9 AND IO LOS AMIGOS RANCH: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTIONS 31, 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 88WEST, SECTIONS 5 AND 6, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST, SECTIONS 35 AND 36,TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST ALL OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING MOREPARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 18 OF SAID SECTION 33;THENCE S I DEGREES 53'48" W 1239.g2 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINES OF GOVERNMENTLOTS 18 AND 19 OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 46,13" W 404.81 FEETALONG THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 399 AT PAGE 265 OFTHE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER oF GARFIELD COUNTY, CoLoRADo; THENCE S ODEGREES 01'13' E 820.48 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRA,CT OF LANDDESCRIBED IN BooK 399 AT PAGE 265; THENCE N 90 DEGREES 00,00" w 890.23 FEET;THENCE S 0 DEGREES 00,00" E 506.00 FEET; THENCE S 75 DEGREES 06,5s" w 94.26FEET; THENCE S 9 DEGREES 32,58" E222.ZZFEET; THENCE S 47 DEGREES 32,07, w282.42 FEET; THENCE S 52 DEGREES 30,32, W 203.Z4FEET; THENCE S 52 DEGREES30'32" w 206.00 FEET; THENCE N 5i DEGREES 0r'17" w 2g4.42FEET; THENCE 266.03FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 748.55 FEET, ACENTRAL ANGLE OF 20 DEGREES 2T' 46", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 31DEGREES 47,14" w 264.63 FEET; THENCE S 21 DEGREES 36,21 " w 29.67 FEET; THENCE75'20 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.18FEET' A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 DEGREES IO'45", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 18DEGREES 00's8" w 75.15 FEET; THENCE N 75 DEGREES34,24" V/ 60.00 FEET; THENCE275.61FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 660.18FEET' A CENTRAL ANGLE oF 23 DEGREES 55'r0" AND suirrNotttc A cHoRD BEARING s 2DEGREES 28'01, w 2j3.61FEET; THENCE S 9 DEGREE S 29,34" E 71.77 FEET; THENCE93.II FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1216.02FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4 DEGREES 23'14", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 11DEGREES 4I'11" E 93.09 FEET; THENCE 310.63 rirr EiONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TOTHE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4531.52 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 DEGREES 55'39"AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 15 DEGREES 50'38" E 310.56 FEET; THENCE S 17DEGREES 48'28" E 157.01 FEET; THENCE t43.59 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TOTHE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5i4.80 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES 58'51"' AND SUBTENDING A cHoRD BEARING s 9 DEGREES 49,02, E 143.12 FEET; THENCE75.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 209.07FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20 DEGREES 33'51', AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING S 8DEGREES 27'19" w 74'64 FEET; THENCE s 86 DEGREES 53'07" w 197.30 FEET; THENCES 62 DEGREES 18,30, W 47r.73 FEET; THENCE N 70 DEGREES 27,09, W 601.07 FEET;THENCE S 65 DEGREES 34'38" W rj4.1t FEET; THENCE S 64 DEGREES 06,04, W 285.93FEET; THENCE s 86 DEGREES 18'00'w 238.66 FEET; THENCE s o DEGREES 3r,il, w292.'tZ FEET; THENCE S l0 DEGREES I1,38, W 64.39 FEET; THENCE S il DEGREES12'19" w 245'56 FEET; THENCE N 87 DEGREES 42'53" w nq.zgFEET; THENCE N 68DEGREES 29's6" w 810.33 FEET; THENCE s 23 DEGREES 06,58, w 395.36 FEET;THENCE s 2 DEGREES 59'0i " w 325.02 FEET; THENCE s 28 DEGREES 30,08" E 3sz.s6FEET; THENCE N 87 DEGREES 29'00" w 900.50 FEET; THENCE S 0 DEGREES 00,00, E1240 '48 FEET To THE NORTH RrGHT oF wAy LINE oF couNTy ROAD No. l 14; THENCEALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES:201.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 445.0IFEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 DEGREES 52,52", AND SLiBTENDING A CHoRD BEARING N 57 Our Order No. GW23l6gt TEGAL DESCRIPTI(]N DEGREES 38,59, w 199.31 FEET; THENCE N 70 DEGREES 35,25" w 60.98 FEET; THENCE334.21FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE I-ETT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 376.30FEET, A CENTRAL AN0LE oF 50 DEGREES 53'12', AND sdgrExotNc A cHoRD BEARTNG s 83DEGREES 57'59" w 323.33 FEET; THENCE s 58 DEGREES 31,23" w 149.63 FEET;THENCE 306'04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF1814.71FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 DEGREES 39, 45".AND SUBTENDING A CHORDBEARING s 53 DEGREES 4r'30" w 305.67 FEET; THENCE s 48 DEGREES 5 r,39" w r71 .60FEET; THENCE 326.89 FEET ALONG THE ARC oF A CURVE To THE RIGHT, HAVING ARADIUS OF 205.97 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 55'55", AND SUBTENDING ACHORD BEARING N 85 DEGREES 40,24" w 2g3.64 FEET; THENCE N 40 DEGREES 12,26" W790.78 FEET; THENCE N 39 DEGREES 40,44" W 1218.56 FEET; THEN C8328.15 FEETALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1265.07 FEET, ACENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 DEGREES 51' 43", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 47DEGREES 06'35" w 327 .23 FEET; THENCE N 0 DEGREES 00,00" E 2008.90 FEET ALONGTHE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36;THENCE S 89 DEGREES 10'45' W 2646.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION36; THENCE N 89 DEGREES s2'30" w 553.90 FEET ALoNG sAID sourH LINE oF sAIDSECTION 36 TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO 82;THENCE N 71 DEGREES 4O'OO' W 2IO.2O FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4 OF SAIDSECTION 36; THENCE N O DEGREES 53'OO'E 40I.12 FEET TO THE NORTH EAST CORNEROF SAID LOT 4; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 55'OO' W 936.02 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINEOF SAID LOT 4 TO THE NORTH zuGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82;THENCE N 52 DEGREES 40'00' w 730.80 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT oF wAy LINE; THENCEN 4l DEGREES 21'30' w 102.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT oF wAy LINE; THENCE N 52DEGREES 40'00" w 275.33 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAy LINE; THENCE N 4 DEGREES34'OO" E 1608.I1 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 TO THE EAST I/4CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE N 88 DEGREES 15,14, w 2232.6IFEET ALoNG THEEAST - WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19 OFSAID SECTIoN 35; THENCE N 0 DEGREES 08'00, w 2gg.47 FEET ALoNG THE EAST LrNEOF SAID LOT 19; THENCE N 88 DEGREES O7'OO' W 264.12 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINEoF SAID Lor 19 To THE NoRTHwEsr coRNER oF SAID Lor 19; THENCE N 6 DEGREES06'46" E2593.28 FEET ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TOTHE NORTH l/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE S 86 DEGREES 19,00" 82448.60FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAIDSECTION 36; THENCE S 86 DEGREES I9'OO' E 4897.20 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OFSAID SECTION 36 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36; THENCE S 0 DEGREES45'39 W 926.55 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 TO THE WEST 1/4coRNER oF SAID SECTIoN 3r; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 33'rz" E3444.43FEET ALONG THEEAST. WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 3I TO THE EAST I/4 CORNER OF SECTION 31;THENCE S 5 DEGREES 06'IO' W 1305.89 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE DESCRIBED IN BOOK613 AT PAGE 567 OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY,COLORADO; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 43.23" E2769.40 FEET ALoNG SAID FENCE DESCRIBEDIN BooK 613 AT PAGE 567 AND BooK 614 AT PAGE 680; THENCE s 9 DEGREE5 s 03,54,w 1395'04 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE DESCRTBED IN BOOK 614 AT PAGE 680; THENCE S 89DEGREES 43'26" E 1334j1FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A FENCEDESCRIBED IN BOOK 614 AT PAGE 679; THENCE N 4 DEGREES 24,02" EZt3z.23 FEETALONG SAID FENCE DESCRIBED IN BOOK 614 AT PAGE 679 AND BOOK 613 AT PAGE 569 ANDBooK 613 AT PAGE 568; THENCE s 86 DEGREES u,34" E 49.izFEET ALoNG THE sourHLINE DESCRIBED IN BOOK 613 AT PAGE 570; THENCE S 87 DEGREES 15,05, E t37g.3ZFEEr ALoNG THE NoRTH LINE oF Lor t aNr; ioils oi roto sECTroN 33 FEET ro rHE Our Order No. GW23 l6g t TEGAL DESCRIPTION POINT OF BEGINNING. A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THESIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING IVIORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF LOS AMIGOS RANCH FILING NO. 5 WHENCETHE NORTHEAST coRNER oF SECTION 8 oF SAID rowGrup AND RANGE BEARS s 54 DEGREES5?'25" E 2460.04 FEET; THENCE s 36 DEGREES 34,44, w 300.19 FEET ALONG sArDBOUNDARY TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOS AMIGOS DRIVE; THENCE ALONC SAIDRIGHT oF wAY LINE THE FoLLowlNG COURSES:216.21FEET ALoNG THE ARC oF A CURVETO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 680.42 FEET A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I8 DEGREES12'22", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 65 DEGREES 20'09" W 215.30 FEET;THENCE 493,60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF429.60 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65 DEGREES 49' 54" AND SUBTENDING A CHORDBEARING N 41 DEGREES 31,23" w 466.89 FEET; THENCE N 8 DEGREES 36,26" w 186.44FEET TO SAID BOUNDARY OF LOS AMIGOS RANCH FILING 5; THENCE S 80 DEGREES 48,37,,E 377 .50 FEET ALONG SAID BOUNDARY; THENCE S 46 DEGRE ES 27,s], E 468.05 FEET TOTHE POINT OF BEGINNING. A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THESIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8 OF SAID TOWNSHIPAND RANGE BEARS s 60 DEGREES 38'00" E 1067.14 FEET; iueNcr s 32 DEGREES 07,00"w 1095'76 FEET To rHE NoRTH RrcHT oF wAy LINE oF Los AMIGoS DRIVE; THENCEALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: N 66 DEGREES 16'26^ W117.03 FEET; THENCE 228.88 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVINGA RADIUS OF 775.10 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 55'08", AND SUBTENDING ACHORD BEARING N 57 DEGREES 48'52" W 228.05 FEET; THENCE 92.49 FEET AL9NG THEARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 12O.OO FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLEOF 44 DEGREES 09' 39', AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N 27 DEGREES 16,28'W90.22 FEET; THENCE 128.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVINGA RADIUS AF 477.49 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES 2I' 40",AND SUBTENDINGA CHORD BEARING N 2 DEGREES 29'tt" E 127.63 FEET; rl[NCe Z:r..BSFEET ALONG THEARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OT O9S.OO FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF19 DEGREES 16'52", AND SUBTENDING A CHORD BEARING N O DEGREES 31'34" 8232.78FEET; THENCE N 9 DEGREES 06,52, w 4Z8.I2FEET; THENCE LEAVTNG SArD RIGHT OFwAY LINE oN A couRSE BEARING N 73 DEGREES 35'42" E 45.58 FEET; THENCE s 15DEGREES 30'40" E 389.18 FEET; THENCE N 72 DEGREES 4r ,46" 850r.54 FEET;THENCE N 89 DEGREES 05'04' E33g,22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO J (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 ENG'TVEEES:S,-t'M- rdnMUESEh- - GORDON MEYER 118 West 6th. Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 July 1, 1999 Mr. Bob Szrot, P.E Garfield County Engineer 109 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs CO 81601 RE: Los Amigos Ranch PUD Amended Preliminarv Plat - Filinqs 6-10 Dear Bob: On Wednesday, June 23, 1999, an Amended Preliminary Plat for Filings 6 thru 1O of Los Amigos Ranch PUD was submitted through Mark's office. I wanted to alert you to the fact there will be referral coming your way in the near future and make sure you understood what this amended submission consisted of from an engineering perspective. As I recall, your first day on the job (or close to it) was to sit in on a meeting on the prior submission and, therefore, I assume some historic information would be in order. There were two major engineering issues on the prior submission. Those involved final agreement on a Drainage Plan and the type of wastewater collection and treatment that was to be provided. From an engineering standpoint, this submission is essentially the same submission as the prior one. While the number of lots have changed slightly, the infrastructure layout is exactly the same except for two of the side roads which shifted horizontal slightly but remain essentially the same roadways. I can point those exact changes out to you if you so desire. With respect to drainage, this letter transmits a report titled "SfORMWATER DETENTION ANALYSIS" completed in Aprilof 1998. This report was developed in response to comments from Wright Water Engineers on the previous Preliminary Plat submittal for Filings 6-1O of the Los Amigos Ranch PUD. This report has been previously been transmitted to the County and has been discussed in detail with Wright Water Engineers. Tlre drainage facilities being proposed for Los Amigos Ranch PUD are identical to those agreed upon as a result of the review process for the prior submission. With respect to the wastewater collection and treatment systems, this proposal is consistent with your recommendations from the prior submission. A low pressure, small diameter collection system is being proposed and treatment will be provided by the Spring Valley Sanitation District. The design of a collection system for this size of project is very complex. What I have given you is a design which I have been working on over the last several months with a manufacturer and supplier of equipment for such a system. This is not intended to be a construction level document but, rather, a Preliminary Plat document which will allow us to identify any additional work that needs to be done in order to get this system to operate efficiently and properly. I would ask for input directly from you on that. RECEIVET] JUL 2 rugg July 1, 1999 Mr. Bob Szrot, P.E. Page 2 I would offer to meet with you at your convenience to go over the submission materials.What I would like to try to prevent is the last-minute memo from the planning Departmentwith comments and conditions which I would then end up responding to in front of thePlanning and Zoning Commission directly. From my standpoint, this submission is in realitya response to conditions from the prior submission so the review on your part should begreatly simplified. Since I believe we have responded to all the conditions of the prior approval, the remaining issues should be small in number. Respectfully submitted, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. DWG:lec/1502c19 Enclosure cc: Mark Bean, Planning Director, w/o encl. Dave Kotz, SGM SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. AMENDED PRELIMINARYPLAN - FILINGS 6.10 Los Amigos Raffich P.U ; .mo r-,. LOS AMIGOS RAATCH (-OI'ER SHEET PRELITTIN,4RY PL.A,V - BOLNDARY PLAN PRELI.IIINAR I' PL.4N . INDE.Y ST{EET PRELIIIINARY PLA,Y. LOT PL.4,V,9 R O,4 D III A S TER I,\' DE.\' LOS A,I{I(K)S DRTIE: ROADI.1 ROAD H ROAD Bt.t Ro.4D l RO.lD C RO.-1D D ROAD E RO.ID F ROAD G fi'ESr RO.4D T''PIC,1 L R O.4 D S ECTIONS .I 1.4 S TER DRA INA GE PLAN FIG T IR E I - GEOLOGTC CONDTTIONS MAP ,WSC. MASTER WTLITY PLAN II',ATER MASTER PLAN I{ASTER SEWER PLAN L'NLITI' DE7'4TLS LIATER STORAGETAM< E,\7ST|NG WELL DETAILS r,?rc-4L LOT PLAN PLII4PTNG .'Y.|TEM PARTAryRSHIP PRELI.I{1.\',4R!-' . IPL..l,\', ) .t-8 RO..tD.t - L.4 t t-,. RANCH MANAGER: GREG BOECKER I ?-t1 t6 t,e t 8.1 to-:l L.1: DRAINAGE GEOL(X;''. (I1LmES- L.4D L.IG PREPAREO BY: L,+L'I LATT2 L.1U-l L.1LI4 L,4LTs LAIT6 L..1[t7 I 18 W. 6th St., Suite 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8160I(e70) e45-too4 ,__-_ E^lctNtERS:s,,- \-Ir rlvt-SCHMUESER -:----GORDON MFYFR _2rulECI_OIQWEER: DEAN W. GORDON, P.E. 14507 REEENEDJUN 2 31999 T1! F PH:AI' DlE E1@ ! */RW r6m crr' @ .\ffi#d,&' )t6@WNt* TI-,-*ffiq4etffi-. -- ;:. <ir -* .,1: t@ p fl' -:D{ @t- t@ q'6.0 {l8 "r ,+_ .,,|@ @ .,< E-,.9 {r r, sf: ..4 I f Lta".\ + .ffi&ffi-*,p@P r I..q-trtuiq ! i:1ff# o a,{' *@t6@c'v'o@w ig'.'i",R?#* - ",-. O.fj* s. .B dtl TJ @14 qnl d t : ^4.4t r4n d,!n< ,tf, ]e,i !.i"-"i; ji'J .:l .,d d d fr . *!a :' t2 d *'fr 6 %6 4 a-.-i i.JJ t-'-J-c';-" ",'^ h 4 F k'e' r( < s 'aca,@@.atd't -6hw :4t'* ffi a ttu l- :T-_- i _=--- i i.i _-_ l--i- - ---L a-:__r= - --- - i_.' f-:-;- ffi ".fl; '-y.5- '.:#;: --';.|;= .: {t':- 'I'= !ffiffi fffi-,i7g='lw,--',ff,18-ft I I,rji # ;::1:=#-'1 2:--: " -- ':i:.-'- ;r.:.:li: efl5aN I DttF lP .+,_,+ l rl [' ",, | ,, l' '.:r I t..-;,--; s(//.t/1..'f,.98p CORDO,T',|/EI'.IR /.1'/: //8 t 6lh Streel. S'u.l" ZOO Clpnuood Sonnos. Colorado 8/60/ 79761 oa.|l7p2i /FA)') .?,/.t Sgia .4spcn. (olorado l/97O) 32, 6727 f,o.f /i//co.f fir'ffcil P. A.D. \/ ntt!u^)::\ F\c.,\y'-f,?.. -5n \Ir rrvl -- I \odor,0l:C2 !lrl2 lr'1.!2:4 raO Jun ll lr l0 19 1199 'd lnc PldLe trur if,rtrdls re'tl I 'li tI eor- \: +\ (.^ Nt\ \ \ '\> eo --.l*_ I I I I It-t?i" )t :I !\ ,!e \ Oo lr It (4s.:i Ii Att \ \G a. i-' I '-(l 'i t\i -i-!.\,: tt$t $- so N stls $ $N:3 $ ! OR R $r$t N *itis N"Ss N\ si I I lq!l !tIt tL---'------1 I \ StQ s N Sta \\\.t C\. N \ \ S i', ,/ !4 -,", N\ I.r li TN-:--l\-\t Q\*riil, ao ii s a *rl I el Ert i,$ a-NDl.: 6',.9. $r t^ N hr Plii ItSi*-i e\ lfrlr! oo I ,000r,01'102 i502-14 'Hll i,q .ro n,n l'l i oCCr\01!02\1502 l.\jrila rrg ieo rrn I ll lr 12 rllg :r;x Inc ,Plrcc iot,r :nrtrdls q.'.rl I ...,1-"' \-'-.1Y2\ )",rE,fi,.' \ -k- !tLotR1' ) L0r rli t{:t il t! tl rilr I illrllrtitt tlrt irfi r ilr l!{}thttlt I i[Jul lrrflli !S$r S $ils E $NT$ $ Q dI N ii$$ N $$$,N \ s \ Sq \ \tisq \\ N N \ \ N fl I I I ! tI I ! IJ A . -1i I I BS R $ I n *bi N\s SN RN\N Ns Ql5'r$ 9, 1 : $"EN b\ ri! -\r \ LOr 20 -.,/ / _- t^ ,t )t t, I \ ", ,/ ;\ \:\- i --.'---...-- \ J,)' - .--: ,/>__ i. 1 I I .: I r)rll)r.0!502\1502.1{' HIb tq ied )u,r r-1 li ll r)6 I'r99 16N lna Pldce tOU' Inrtrdls n?f$l t 000rr01502\150! l.'ixl/ l,q rrd n/n tl lJ 18 )1 l'l+l llil I^c rpltc' Your iilri rrl: rrrpl I 'rj00r UI502't5r,J :t r,HrB lrq reU !n ?l lJ lg J0 I lI lX :, L lPl rLr /o!r l',rt rrls rrP.'l